alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.42**

 

CGS Real Estate Company,Inc.

 

 

February 25, 2003

 

 

American Spectrum Realty,Inc.

7700 Irvine Center Drive

Irvine, CA  92618

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We hereby agree toguarantee the payment to you by CGS Real Estate Company, Inc. (“CGS”) of its$270,375 obligation to you, pursuant to your letter agreement of this date withCGS, in the event CGS fails to pay to you any amount due thereunder.

 

As security for ourcontingent guarantee obligation, we hereby assign to you our right to receive$270,375 of principal payments on the notes payable to us and our affiliates byreason of the settlement of the Teachout litigation, plus all interest payableon such principal amount of notes.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

 
| */s/  William J. Carden* |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| William J. Carden        |

 

 
| */s/John  N. Galardi* |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
| John N. Galardi       |

 

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Reserve Act Amendment

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency. Subcommittee No. 2					 and 	Eighty-Sixth Congress, 1959-1961. 						*Federal Reserve Act Amendment : Hearing Before Subcommittee No. 2 of the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Eighty-Sixth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 12346, May 31, 1960*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										May 31, 1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/371,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Amendment No. 1 to
                   Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of
                           First Colonial Group, Inc.


     RESOLVED,  that the Directors of the Corporation have determined that it is
in  the  best  interest  of  the  Corporation  and  its  shareholders  that  the
Non-Employee  Director  Stock  Option Plan (the  "Director  Plan") be amended by
deleting  the second  sentence of Section 3 and  inserting  in lieu  thereof the
following (the "Amendment"):

     "Each  person who (a) is not a director  of the  Company or any  subsidiary
     corporation as of May 1, 1994, and (b) is not an employee of the Company or
     any subsidiary corporation and who on or after May 1, 1994 is first elected
     or  appointed as a director of the Company or any  subsidiary  corporation,
     shall,  as of the date of such election or  appointment,  automatically  be
     granted an option to purchase  1,000 shares of the  Company's  Common Stock
     (such figure to be subject to adjustment  for the same events  described in
     Section 2 hereof); provided, however, that any non-employee director who is
     first  appointed  as a  director  after  May 1,  1994 and prior to the 1995
     Annual  Meeting of  Shareholders  shall  receive  such  automatic  grant of
     options on the date of the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders."

     RESOLVED,  that the  Amendment is adopted and approved and the President of
the  Corporation  is  authorized  and  directed to submit the  Amendment  to the
shareholders for their approval at the 1995 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;  and
further

     RESOLVED,  that the  appropriate  officers  of the  Corporation  are hereby
authorized and directed to take all such actions and to execute and file,  under
the corporate seal of the Corporation,  all such  certificates,  instruments and
documents as they may deem  necessary or  appropriate  to carry out the purposes
and intent of each of the foregoing resolutions.
# C_2020030EN.01000801.xml

| 29.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 January 2020

(2020/C 30/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1005 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4728 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84603 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5993 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0703 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0758 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,221 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 337,18 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2731 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7784 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5475 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6290 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4516 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5578 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6844 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4949 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 297,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1249 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6338 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4410 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 008,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4972 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,878 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,9032 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,945 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,6196 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7316 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,4545 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1005

JPY

Japanese yen

120,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4728

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84603

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5993

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0703

ISK

Iceland króna

137,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0758

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,221

HUF

Hungarian forint

337,18

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2731

RON

Romanian leu

4,7784

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5475

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6290

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4516

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5578

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6844

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4949

KRW

South Korean won

1 297,20

ZAR

South African rand

16,1249

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6338

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4410

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 008,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4972

PHP

Philippine peso

55,878

RUB

Russian rouble

68,9032

THB

Thai baht

33,945

BRL

Brazilian real

4,6196

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7316

INR

Indian rupee

78,4545

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### Hilltop Village Cooperative No. 4, Inc., Appellant, v. Sidney Kessler et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Kessler-Wohl Associates, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. H & M Concrete Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Motion by appellant for reargument denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 352.211-3 Paperwork Reduction Act.

As prescribed in HHSAR 311.7301, the Contracting Officer shall insert the following clause:

# Paperwork Reduction Act (DEC 2015)

(a) This contract involves a requirement to collect or record information calling either for answers to identical questions from 10 or more persons other than Federal employees, or information from Federal employees which is outside the scope of their employment, for use by the Federal government or disclosure to third parties; therefore, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*) shall apply to this contract. No plan, questionnaire, interview guide or other similar device for collecting information (whether repetitive or single time) may be used without the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) first providing clearance. Contractors and the Contracting Officer's Representative shall be guided by the provisions of 5 CFR part 1320, Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public, and seek the advice of the HHS operating division or Office of the Secretary Reports Clearance Officer to determine the procedures for acquiring OMB clearance.

(b) The Contractor shall not expend any funds or begin any data collection until the Contracting Officer provides the Contractor with written notification authorizing the expenditure of funds and the collection of data. The Contractor shall allow at least 120 days for OMB clearance. The Contracting Officer will consider excessive delays caused by the Government which arise out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor in accordance with the Excusable Delays or Default clause of this contract.

(End of clause)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Executive Office of the President.

# ACTION:

Notice.

                    By virtue of the authority vested in the President by 42 U.S.C. 2652, the rates referenced below are hereby established. These rates are for use in connection with the recovery from tortiously liable third persons for the outpatient medical, dental and cosmetic surgery services furnished by military treatment facilities through the Department of Defense. They are the same rates as the outpatient third party reimbursement rates that were set on July 1, 2020 for billing medical insurers, but require a different approval authority for the purpose of billing for tort liability. The rates were established in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-25, requiring reimbursement of the full cost of all services provided. The Calendar Year 2020 outpatient medical, dental and cosmetic surgery services referenced are effective for billing tort liability upon publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     and will remain in effect until further notice. Previously published inpatient rates remain in effect until further notice. Pharmacy rates are updated periodically. A full disclosure of the rates is posted at                     *Health.mil*                     website in the Defense Health Agency Uniform Business Office section (                    *http://health.mil/​Military-Health-Topics/​Business-Support/​Uniform-Business-Office/​Billing/​Medical-Affirmative-Claims*).                

Robert S. Fairweather,

Deputy Associate Director, International Affairs Division, Acting Director.

[FR Doc. 2021-03634 Filed 2-22-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10194 

To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from finalizing, 

implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing’’, which was published on February 9, 2023. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. 

GROTHMAN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BABIN, and Mr. CLINE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing’’, which was published on February 9, 2023. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flexibility in Housing 

5 Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10194 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RULES BY THE SEC2 RETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOP3 MENT. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary of Housing and 

5 Urban Development may not finalize, implement, or en6 force the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Affirmatively Furthering 

7 Fair Housing’’, which was published on February 9, 2023, 

8 nor may such rule be reissued in substantially the same 

9 form, and a new rule that is substantially the same as 

10 such a rule may not be issued, unless the reissued or new 

11 rule is specifically authorized by a law enacted thereafter. 

12 (b) REINSTATEMENT.—The final rule of the Depart13 ment of Housing and Urban Development entitled, ‘‘Pre14 serving Community and Neighborhood Choice’’ (85 Fed 

15 Reg 47899, August 7, 2020) shall have the full force and 

16 effect of law. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### In the Matter of the Rockland County Chapter, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., et al., Appellants, v County of Rockland, Respondent.

— In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, in which respondent cross-applied to vacate the award, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated April 11, 1978, which vacated the award on the ground that the arbitrators had exceeded their power. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The grievance board acknowledged that it had no authority to deal with the reclassification of positions, inasmuch as the scope of arbitration was expressly limited in that regard by the contract (see *Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn.,*41 NY2d 578, 582). By its award, however, the board effectively reclassified the grievants; that is, the board determined that the grievants ought to be paid at a higher rate for their duties. *685Whatever "special circumstances” the board felt existed because the grievants’ positions had been newly established, they did not permit the board, under the guise of fashioning a remedy for an "inequitable situation”, to reclassify the positions. Mollen, P.J., O’Connor, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Spirit leveling in SouthCarolina, 1896-1938. Part 1, Northern South Carolina**
 
Report | Plate: 02
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:890-A
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000965677
 
October 30, 2018
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Family and Community Engagement Resources by State      

# Family and Community Engagement Resources by State

ED has created an interactive map of family and community engagement resources offered by state education agencies. Users can click on a state to view and access a list of resources and more information. 

http://www.ed.gov/family-and-community-engagement?utm_source=Find%20Youth%20Info&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
NO. 07-03-0320-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	NOVEMBER 24, 2003

	______________________________

	JOHN FOLMER,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 106TH DISTRICT COURT OF LYNN COUNTY;

	NO. 02-2605; HON. CARTER T. SCHILDKNECHT, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

			Order of Dismissal

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Pending before the court is the appeal of John Folmer (appellant).  We abated the matter to the trial court on September 19, 2003, because the court reporter represented that appellant had failed to pay, or make arrangements to pay for, the record.  At the hearing convened by the trial court per our directive, appellant informed it that he no longer cared to prosecute his appeal.  This representation then was memorialized by the trial court in findings of fact and conclusions of law filed with us on November 24, 2003. 

	Although we have no formal motion to dismiss before us as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), Rule 2 of the same rules permits us to suspend the operation of an existing rule.  Tex. R. App. P. 2; see Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref'd).  Therefore, pursuant to Rule 2, and because appellant has clearly revealed his desire to forego appeal, we suspend Rule 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal based upon appellant's representation to the trial court.

	Having so dismissed the appeal, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							Brian Quinn 

                     	           	             	   Justice

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,237
<PP&E>                                          12,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,804
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,538
<SALES>                                         18,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           10,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,594)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (498)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### 52.228-2 Additional Bond Security.

As prescribed in 28.106-4(a), insert the following clause:

# Additional Bond Security (OCT 1997)

The Contractor shall promptly furnish additional security required to protect the Government and persons supplying labor or materials under this contract if—

(a) Any surety upon any bond, or issuing financial institution for other security, furnished with this contract becomes unacceptable to the Government;

(b) Any surety fails to furnish reports on its financial condition as required by the Government;

(c) The contract price is increased so that the penal sum of any bond becomes inadequate in the opinion of the Contracting Officer; or

(d) An irrevocable letter of credit (ILC) used as security will expire before the end of the period of required security. If the Contractor does not furnish an acceptable extension or replacement ILC, or other acceptable substitute, at least 30 days before an ILC's scheduled expiration, the Contracting officer has the right to immediately draw on the ILC.

(End of clause)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 31653, June 20, 1996; 62 FR 44807, Aug. 22, 1997]
#### People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Patrick D. Fahey, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 9,605.

*439opinion filed February 7, 1941.

William C. Mooney, Thomas D. Nash and Michael J. Ahern, for plaintiff in error; Daniel J. Lamont and John J. Kennelly, of counsel; James E. Burke, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Wolfe.

“Not to be published in full.”