```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10177 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10177

   To prohibit the award of Federal grants to applicants submitting 
  duplicative or fraudulent applications, to require the Director of 
      Office of Management and Budget to establish a tracking and 
  deconfliction system for Federal grant applications, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2024

  Mrs. Bice (for herself, Mr. Moore of Utah, and Mr. Bean of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the award of Federal grants to applicants submitting 
  duplicative or fraudulent applications, to require the Director of 
      Office of Management and Budget to establish a tracking and 
  deconfliction system for Federal grant applications, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Decreasing Overlapping Grants 
Efficiently Act'' or the ``DOGE Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AWARD OF FEDERAL GRANTS TO APPLICANTS SUBMITTING 
              DUPLICATIVE OR FRAUDULENT APPLICATIONS.

    (a) No Award on Basis of Duplicative Application.--
            (1) Prohibition.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as provided for under 
                subparagraph (B), the head of an executive agency may 
                not award a grant to an applicant determined by the 
                head of the agency or the Inspector General of the 
                agency to have received another grant from the head of 
                another executive agency for the same or identical 
                purpose.
                    (B) Exception.--The prohibition under subparagraph 
                (A) related to the award of grants for the same or 
                identical purposes shall not apply to an applicant that 
                is an institution of higher education.
            (2) Determination.--In the case that the head of an 
        executive agency or the Inspector General of the agency 
        determines that an applicant for a grant has submitted an 
        application for another grant from another executive agency for 
        the same or identical purpose, the heads of such agencies shall 
        jointly determine which agency is the appropriate agency to 
        award the grant, if such grant is to be awarded to such 
        applicant.
    (b) No Award on Basis of Fraudulent Application.--The head of an 
executive agency may not award a grant to an applicant determined by 
the head of the agency or the Inspector General of the agency to have 
submitted a fraudulent application for such grant.

SEC. 3. TRACKING AND DECONFLICTION SYSTEM FOR FEDERAL GRANT 
              APPLICATIONS.

    (a) Establishment.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget shall make available to the heads of executive agencies, 
including the Inspectors General of such agencies, an electronic system 
through which the head of an executive agency may determine before 
awarding a grant, or through which an Inspector General of an executive 
agency may determine in conducting an audit or investigation, whether 
any applicant for such grant has received, or submitted an application 
to the head of another executive agency for, another grant for the same 
or identical purpose.
    (b) Contents of System.--The system shall contain at a minimum, the 
name of the awardee, the principal investigator, the award period, 
agency point of contact, and an abstract.
    (c) Essentially Equivalent Work.--The Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget shall establish an electronic system which 
contains information for all federal research awards through which the 
head of an executive agency may determine before awarding a grant, or 
through which an Inspector General of an executive agency may determine 
in conducting an audit or investigation, whether any applicant for such 
award has received, or submitted an application to the head of another 
executive agency for, another award for essentially equivalent work.

SEC. 4. REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF LEVERAGING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO 
              IDENTIFY DUPLICATIVE FEDERAL GRANT APPLICATIONS.

    The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in 
consultation with the Secretary of Energy, the Director of the National 
Science Foundation, and the Director of the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, shall submit to the appropriate Congressional 
committees a report on the feasibility of leveraging artificial 
intelligence to rapidly identify, with respect to an application for a 
grant submitted to the head of an executive agency--
            (1) whether an applicant for such grant has received, or 
        submitted an application to the head of another executive 
        agency for, another grant for the same or identical purpose; 
        and
            (2) waste, fraud, and abuse.

SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Applicable time period.--The term ``applicable time 
        period'' means--
                    (A) with respect to a covered application for a 
                grant awarded after the date on which system is 
                established under section 2(a), during the period--
                            (i) beginning on the date on which such 
                        application is submitted; and
                            (ii) ending on the date on which amounts 
                        under the grant are no longer being expended; 
                        and
                    (B) with respect to a covered application for a 
                grant awarded before the date on which the system is 
                established under section 2(a), during the period--
                            (i) beginning on that date; and
                            (ii) ending on the date on which amounts 
                        under the grant are no longer being expended.
            (2) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
        ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
                    (A) the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 
                and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of 
                Representatives; and
                    (B) the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                Governmental Affairs and the Committee on 
                Appropriations of the Senate.
            (3) Covered application.--The term ``covered application'' 
        means an application for a grant submitted to the head of an 
        executive agency--
                    (A) after the date on which the system is 
                established under section 2(a); and
                    (B) before that date, if amounts under the grant 
                are still being expended on such date.
            (4) Executive agency.--The term ``executive agency'' means 
        an agency in the executive branch of the Federal Government.
            (5) Institution of higher education.--The term 
        ``institution of higher education'' has the meaning given such 
        term in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
        U.S.C.1002).
                                 <all>
```