### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 

### and , HgP, and Hg+2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

130 Santee Cooper-CrossUnit #3Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in Question 16 (page 17) of the questionnaireEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 130 Santee Cooper-Cross Unit #3

1 6/17/2010 9:30AM 6/17/2010 2 6/17/2010 1:05 PM 6/17/2010 3 6/17/2010 4:25 PM 6/17/2010 Test End Date Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) 12:35PM 3.18E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 316 BDL 4:10 PM 3.34E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 316 BDL 7:30 PM 3.46E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 316 BDL Formaldehyde Emission Test Results Test End TimeTest Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 [<14.4] 3.85E-06 2.76E-03 4266.45 5680.75 [<15.9] 4.05E-06 2.90E-03 4269.53 5681.25 [<16.4] 4.17E-06 3.00E-03 4260.63 5687.01 Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure 14.8 14.48 4.91 1304817 130 444.54 bitum inous lb/hour 15 14.37 4.91 1324333 129.9 444.58 bitum inous lb/hour 15 14.37 4.85 1321233 130 445.03 bitum inous lb/hour Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow

Rate (dscfm)Measurement

Method boiler efficiency

calculation Fuel Input = Kpph boiler efficiency

calculation Fuel Input = Kpph boiler efficiency

calculation Fuel Input = Kpph Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 130 Santee Cooper-Cross Unit #3

1 6/17/2010 10:00AM 2 6/17/2010 1:25PM 3 6/17/2010 4:00PM Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

6/17/2010 12:00PM 6.5 Dry 6/17/2010 3:25PM 7.6 Dry 6/17/2010 6:00PM 10.1 Dry Test End Date Test End Time Methane Emission Test ResultsTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu

U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL 3.45E-03 U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL 4.04E-03 U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL 5.34E-03 Methane Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2

5.65 4266.45 5680.75 14.8 14.48 4.91 1304817 6.61 4269.53 5681.25 15 14.37 4.91 1324333 8.75 4260.63 5687.01 15 14.37 4.85 1321233 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method
130 444.54 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel input=Kpph 129.9 444.58 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel input=Kpph 130 445.03 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel input=Kpph Other Supporting Information Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 130 Santee Cooper-Cross Unit #3

1 6/18/2010 9:45 AM 2 6/18/2010 12:30 PM 3 6/18/2010 2:57 PM Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Measured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

6/18/2010 11:45 AM 0.294 Dry 6/18/2010 2:30 PM 0.287 Dry 6/18/2010 4:57 PM 0.283 Dry

Test End Time Test End Date Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 2.32E-07 4261.95 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 2.32E-07 4283.01 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 2.23E-07 4271.97 Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate

5679.74 15.2 14.46 4.93 1334850 129.9 444.46 5694.21 15.1 14.36 4.95 1344500 129.1 445.59 5702.08 14.9 14.38 4.91 1342567 130 446.21 Flue Gas Temperature (F) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr)QA /QC Documentation

Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng)
bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel input=Kpph 73876 85 0.9 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel input=Kpph 73536 85 0.2 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel input=Kpph 73895 86 0.7 Fuel #1 Other Supporting InformationTotal

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng) Sample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%)
85.9 20 65.9 0.22546 0.618291493 1.058823529 85.2 20 65.2 0.23133 0.6920849 0.235294118 86.7 20 66.7 0.233713 0.709417106 0.813953488 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≤20% of field recovery test Trap #1Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike
0.292291316 73112 66 0.3 66.3 0 66.3 0.281848442 73132 66 1.1 67.1 0 67.1 0.285392768 70203 65 0 65 0 65 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of SectionSample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm)
0.224066 0.672560493 0.454545455 0.29589496 0.229729 0.672560493 1.666666667 0.292083281 0.232055 0.672560493 0 0.280106009 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤20% of field recovery test Trap #2Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec R (%) by Run Ravg(%) Limit

0.003604 0.612671 0.003604 95.9 0.010235 1.783285 0.010235 88.2 0.005287 0.934884 -0.00529 106.2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≥ 10 % RD mass

for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or
≤20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

96.76666667 Paired Trap Agreement (RD)EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

130 Santee Cooper-Cross Unit #3

1 6/17/2010 9:30AM 6/17/2010 2 6/17/2010 1:05 PM 6/17/2010 3 6/17/2010 4:25 PM 6/17/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
12:35PM 1.42E-02 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 4:10 PM 7.92E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod 7:30 PM 7.92E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26A-Mod Test End Time Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<57.7] 1.50E-05 4266.45 5680.75 15.6 14.48 BDL [<37.7] 9.58E-06 4269.53 5681.25 12.8 14.37 BDL [<37.4] 9.54E-06 4260.63 5687.01 15.3 14.37 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method 4.91 1294800 127.3 469.17 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation 4.91 1355717 127.9 469.02 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation 4.85 1312350 127.9 470.10 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%)Fuel Input = Kpph

Fuel Input = Kpph Fuel Input = Kpph Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 130 Santee Cooper-Cross Unit #3

1 6/18/2010 8:20AM 2 6/18/2010 12:45 PM 3 6/18/2010 5:05PM Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeTotal Dissolved Solids (mg solids/liter) Total Suspended Solids (mg solids/liter)
6/18/2010 12:25PM 14600 213000 6/18/2010 4:50PM 11300 240000 6/18/2010 9:10PM 28600 7440

Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL)
Standard Methods of the Examination of W ater and W astewater Method 2540B ADL Standard Methods of the Examination of W ater and W astewater Method 2540B ADL Standard Methods of the Examination of W ater and W astewater Method 2540B ADL Constisuent Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments Fuel Input Rate

4261.95 5679.74 1334850 129.9 444.46 4283.01 5694.21 1344500 129.1 445.59 4271.97 5702.08 1342567 130 446.21 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method
bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel Input = Kpph bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel Input = Kpph bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel Input = Kpph Other Supporting Information Fuel #1