alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit23**

 

**Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-64316, 333-83723, 333-59667 and333-33095) or our report dated March 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of National Mercantile Bancorp and subsidiaries includedin the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 
|                    | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    |                      |
| Los Angeles, California |                      |
| March 28, 2005          |                      |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE: 

2 p.m., Thursday, February 18, 2021.

# PLACE: 

Via Conference Call.

# STATUS: 

Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Regular Board of Directors meeting.

The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2) and (4) permit closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:

## Executive Session

### Agenda

I. Call to Order

II. Executive Session: Report from CEO

III. Executive Session: Report of CFO

IV. Executive Session: NeighborWorks Compass Update

V. Action Item Approval of Minutes

VI. Action Item Recognition of Service for Deputy Secretary Brian Montgomery

VII. Action Item FY2021 All-Sources Budget

VIII. Discussion item Capital Corporations

IX. Management Program Background and Updates

X. Adjournment

*Portions Open to the Public:*                     Everything except the Executive Session.                

*Portions Closed to the Public:*                     Executive Session.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Lakeyia Thompson, Special Assistant, (202) 524-9940;                         *Lthompson@nw.org.*

Lakeyia Thompson,

Special Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2021-03158 Filed 2-11-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
#### Robert PEACE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-6977-pr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2007.

*134Robert J. Boyle, Law Office of Robert J. Boyle, New York, NY, for Appellant.

Rua M. Kelly, Assistant United States Attorney, (Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney, Kenneth Allen Polite, Jr., Jonathan S. Kolodner, Assistant United States Attorneys), United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Hon. ROBERT D. SACK and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner-appellant Robert Peace seeks review of an order of the District Court denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues on appeal.

On appeal of a denial of a § 2255 motion, “we review a district court’s conclusions of law *de novo*but will accept its factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous.” *Sapia v. United States,*433 F.3d 212, 216 (2d Cir.2005). The Supreme Court’s two-pronged test in *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), provides that in order to prove a Sixth Amendment violation for ineffective assistance of counsel, petitioner must show both (i) “that counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness ... under prevailing professional norms,” *id.*at 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052; and (ii) “that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense,” *id.*at 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052. *Aparicio v. Artuz,*269 F.3d 78, 95 (2d Cir.2001) (applying the same test to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal).

Petitioner-appellant argues that his Sixth Amendment right was violated when his counsel, on direct appeal, failed to challenge his sentence based on *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We note that, at the time of his direct appeal, petitioner’s *Apprendi*argument was foreclosed by our decision in *United States v. Luciano,*311 F.3d 146, 151 (2d Cir.2002) (concluding that where “the defendant’s sentence is within the otherwise applicable maximum, no violation of *Apprendi*has occurred”). It was more than two years after appellate counsel filed the direct appeal that our court decided *United States v. Gonzalez,*420 F.3d 111, 115-16 (2d Cir.2005) (holding that drug quantity is an element of an offense for the purposes of determining a mandatory minimum and, accordingly, must be found by a jury). We have repeatedly held, when assessing the “objective standard of reasonableness” component of *Strickland,*that counsel is “not required to ‘forecast changes or advances in the law.’ ” *Sellan v. Kuhlman,*261 F.3d 303, 315 (2d Cir.2001) (quoting *Jameson v. Coughlin,*22 F.3d 427, 429 (2d Cir.1994)); *see also Mayo v. Henderson,*13 F.3d 528, 533 (2d Cir.1994). Therefore, we cannot say that appellate counsel’s failure to raise an *Apprendi*challenge was objectively unreasonable.

The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
#### 6.201 Policy.

Acquisitions made under this subpart require use of the competitive procedures prescribed in 6.102.

[64 FR 51831, Sept. 24, 1999]
#### 725.703 Source and Nationality requirements—Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 752.225-70, Source and Nationality Requirements in all USAID program-funded solicitations and contracts for goods or services, unless source and nationality requirements do not apply as set forth at 22 CFR 228.02.
#### 609.402 Policy.

The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee to be the debarring official and the suspending official.

[80 FR 6919, Feb. 9, 2015]
#### David H. Hall, Respondent, v Jeffrey A. Colle, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) David H. Hall, Respondent, v Jeffrey A. Colle, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

[776 NYS2d 906]

In two related actions to recover damages for breach of a promissory note, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), entered August 26, 2003, which denied his motion to dismiss Action No. 2 as time-barred, and granted the plaintiffs cross motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b for an extension of time to serve the summons in Action No. 1.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss Action No. 2, and substituting therefor a provision granting the motion, and dismissing Action No. 2; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Upon consideration of the relevant factors, the Supreme Court properly concluded that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the plaintiff an extension of time to effect service in Action No. 1 *(see*CPLR 306-b; *Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer,*97 NY2d 95 [2001]). However, since it is undisputed that Action No. 2 was commenced after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss that action as time-barred *(see Hafkin v North Shore Univ. Hosp.,*279 AD2d 86, 88 [2000], *affd sub nom. Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, supra).*Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Five Things About Substance Use Intervention      

# Resource: Five Things About Substance Use Intervention

This fact sheet (PDF, 2 pages) offers five statements on promising principles and practices of substance use disorder treatment and interventions. The statements are based on practices rated by CrimeSolutions.**Learn more.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's March 31, 1999 consolidated financial statements and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,130
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,948
<INVENTORY>                                     19,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,158
<PP&E>                                          25,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           321
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,645
<SALES>                                         14,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,998
<CGS>                                            8,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,676)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (826)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,850)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,850)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
  =======================================================================
  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
  company's  financial  statements  as of  and for the nine months  ended
  December 31, 1995 and is qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to
  such financial statements.
  =======================================================================

</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1995

<CASH>                         $   796,570
<SECURITIES>                   $         0
<RECEIVABLES>                  $35,705,671
<ALLOWANCES>                   $   706,165
<INVENTORY>                    $         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               $         0
<PP&E>                         $   658,342
<DEPRECIATION>                 $   425,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 $36,217,119

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          $         0
<BONDS>                        $         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          $         0
<PREFERRED>                    $         0
<COMMON>                       $20,623,866

<OTHER-SE>                     $   196,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   $36,217,119

<SALES>                        $   986,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               $   986,743
<CGS>                          $         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  $         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               $   138,524
<LOSS-PROVISION>               $    22,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             $   237,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                $   587,838
<INCOME-TAX>                   $         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            $         0
<DISCONTINUED>                 $         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                $         0
<CHANGES>                      $         0
<NET-INCOME>                   $   587,838

<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.08


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2

Michael Kingman Low 

Manager/Trustee - Small World Traders, LLC. 

 

 

September 2, 2014 

  

  

Steele Resources, Inc. 

2705 Garnet Ave Suite 2a 

San Diego, CA 92109 

  

To the Board of Directors of Steele Resources Corp. 

  

Re: Revolving Credit Note dated 4.8.2013 

  

“Small World Traders Secured Note:  On April 8, 2013, the Company issued a revolving line of credit for $200,000 with Small World Traders Secured Note with an interest rate of 8%. This note is secured by the following assets of the Company and a UCC1 was filed for all the Intellectual Property, Current or Previously Filed, Trademarks, Formulations, Research and Development Equipment, Manufacturing Equipment, Office Equipment, and all interests in Shooting Star Mining Company LLC.  The note is due December 31, 2013.  Small World Traders paid $200,327 of expenses on behalf of the Company.  On January 1, 2014 the Note was extended to April 15, 2014 subject to additional consideration.”   

  

These dates have passed and we have not received payment.  In lieu of all of the above, please remit this amount plus interest as agreed to immediately.  Consider this as a formal demand for immediate payment as a consequence of an Event of Default. 

  

  

Sincerely, 

  

  

Michael K. Low, Mgr.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Social-Emotional Learning and Mental Health Toolkit: Support for Systems and Programs      

# Resource: Social-Emotional Learning and Mental Health Toolkit: Support for Systems and Programs

This toolkit supports out-of-school time (OST) and school-age child care system leaders, technical assistance associates, and program providers. The toolkit provides resources for system and program leaders on these topics: 
                  -  Trauma  
                  -  Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) and Mental Health Support  
                  -  Family Engagement Strategies  

This toolkit can be used as a supplement for OST programming and curricula or as a standalone resource to clarify your SEL and mental health learning practices and supports. **Learn more.**
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 79

 Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on May 11, 
                                 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2023

  Mr. Gaetz (for himself and Mr. Gosar) submitted the following joint 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on May 11, 
                                 2004.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That pursuant to section 202 
of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national 
emergency declared by the finding of the President on May 11, 2004, in 
Executive Order 13338, is hereby terminated.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 2, 2009
7.106 Additional requirements for major systems. ( a ) In planning for the solicitation of a major system (see part 34) development contract, planners shall consider requiring offerors to include, in their offers, proposals to incorporate in the design of a major system— ( 1 ) Items which are currently available within the supply system of the agency responsible for the major system, available elsewhere in the national supply system, or commercially available from more than one source; and
( 2 ) Items which the Government will be able to acquire competitively in the future if they are likely to be needed in substantial quantities during the system's service life.
( b ) In planning for the solicitation of a major system (see part 34) production contract, planners shall consider requiring offerors to include, in their offers, proposals identifying opportunities to assure that the Government will be able to obtain, on a competitive basis, items acquired in connection with the system that are likely to be acquired in substantial quantities during the service life of the system. Proposals submitted in response to such requirements may include the following: ( 1 ) Proposals to provide the Government the right to use technical data to be provided under the contract for competitive future acquisitions, together with the cost to the Government, if any, of acquiring such technical data and the right to use such data.
( 2 ) Proposals for the qualification or development of multiple sources of supply for competitive future acquisitions.
( c ) In determining whether to apply paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, planners shall consider the purposes for which the system is being acquired and the technology necessary to meet the system's required capabilities. If such proposals are required, the contracting officer shall consider them in evaluating competing offers. In noncompetitive awards, the factors in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, may be considered by the contracting officer as objectives in negotiating the contract.
[50 FR 27561, July 3, 1985 and 51 FR 27116, July 29, 1986; 84 FR 19843, May 6, 2019]
#### Lottie Knowles, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,618.

Action for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. L. P. Harriss, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

Francis X. Busch, Corporation Counsel, and John J. Kelly, City Attorney, for appellant; Earl B. Dickerson, Assistant City Attorney, and Daniel V. Gallery, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.

Edwin H. Arnold and Charles H. Mitchell, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.