alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas D. O'Malley, Chief Executive Officer of The Premcor Refining Group
Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
do hereby certify as follows with respect to the Company:

     1. The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification on this 25th day
of July, 2003.

                                                    By: /s/ Thomas D. O'Malley
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Premcor Refining Group Inc. and will be retained by The Premcor
Refining Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Joseph L. VAN PATTEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Randall WRIGHT, Shawano County Sheriff, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-1276.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

June 16, 2008.

Linda T. Coberly, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Christopher Wren, Office of the Attorney General Wisconsin Department of Justice, Madison, WI, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge, TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge, ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This case has been the subject of two reported opinions from our court. *See Van Patten v. Deppisch,*434 F.3d 1038 (7th Cir.2006), and *Van Patten v. Endicott,*489 F.3d 827 (7th Cir.2007). Its history will not be repeated here.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court determined that *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), not *United States v. Cronic,*466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984), is the correct authority for reviewing Joseph Van Patten’s claim that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel during the proceedings against him in the Circuit Court for Shawano County, Wisconsin. *See Wright v. Van Patten,*- U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 743, 169 L.Ed.2d 583 (2008) (per curiam). As we made clear in our first opinion, and reiterate here, Van Patten’s claim cannot succeed under *Strickland.*

Accordingly, we direct the district court to vacate its order (entered earlier at our direction) granting Mr. Van Patten’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court should *608then enter an order dismissing Mr. Van Patten’s petition.

SO ORDERED.

COFFEY, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

This case has been the subject of two reported opinions from our Court. *See, Van Patten v. Endicott,*489 F.3d 827 (7th Cir.2007), *rev’d, Wright v. Van Patten,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 743, 169 L.Ed.2d 583 (2008); *Van Patten v. Deppisch,*434 F.3d 1038 (7th Cir.2006). A complete history will not be repeated here.

Earlier this year, in *Wright v. Van Patten,*- U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 743, 169 L.Ed.2d 583 (2008), the Supreme court determined that the correct authority for reviewing Van Patten’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right, *vis-a-vis,*the use of a telephone in accepting his guilty plea during the proceedings in the Circuit Court for Shawano County, is *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), Wisconsin. *See, Wright v. Van Patten,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 743, 169 L.Ed.2d 583 (2008) (per curiam). Further, the Court held that the state court proceeding did not result in a decision that was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal Law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, 28 U.S.C., § 2254(d)(1).

The Supreme Court also reversed our judgment in *Van Patten v. Endicott,*489 F.3d 827 (7th Cir.2007), *rev’d, Wright v. Van Patten,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 743, 169 L.Ed.2d 583 (2008) and remanded the case to this court to comply with the Court’s order.
Bedrock geologic map of the Port Wing, Solon Springs, and parts of the 

Duluth and Sandstone 30• X so• quadrangles, Wisconsin and Minnesota 

By Suzanne W. Nicholson, William F. Cannon, Laurel G. Woodruff, and Connie L. Dicken 

Scientific Investigations Map 2869 

2006 

U.S. Department of the Interior 

U.S. Geological Survey 0 Printed on recycled paper 

z 

c:;· 

:::r 

0 

(ij" 

0 

::I 

Q) 

::I 

0.. 

0 

r-+ 

:::r 

CD 

Cil 

I 

to 

CD 

0.. 

0 

0 

;;<:" 

co 

CD 

0 

0 

co 

c:;· 

3 

Q) 

:::' 

IJ 

0 

:::+ 

:2:: 

::;· 

~ 

(/.) 

0 

0 

::I 

(/.) 

"C 

...., 

::;· 

co 

~(/) 

0 

==- s 

~:::r 

Q) 

::I 

0.. 

(/.) 

Q) 

::I 

0.. 

~ 0 

::I 

CD 

.J:l 

c:: 

Q) 

0.. 

...., 

Q) 

::I ' 

co co' 

~(/)
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 223 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural 

Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting 

and Exemptions’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2024 

Mr. GROTHMAN submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Waste 

Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including 

Netting and Exemptions’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Waste Emis5 sions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: 

6 Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 223 IH 

1 and Exemptions’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 91094 (November 18, 

2 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER0S22020      

# PPRER0S22020

Magura, S., Kang, S. Y.,  Shapiro, J. L. (1994). Outcomes of intensive AIDS education for male adolescent drug users in jail. Journal of Adolescent Health, 15(6), 457-463.

N/ADid not meet the review's screening criteria
#### 606.302-7 Public interest.

The authority to approve the determination prescribed in FAR 6.302-7(c) is reserved to the Secretary of State.
Third District.

#### James White, defendant in error, v. Roland R. Stafford and Edward C. Broehl, plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 7,911.

Action to recover commission for sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the Circuit Court of Logan county; the Hon. Frank Lindley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1926.

Rehearing denied June 22, 1926.

Alonzo Hoff and Harold F. Trapp, for plaintiffs in error.

Murphy *&>*Wright, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
Industrial sites controlled by others

Use of the formulated substance (trade products) in leather tanneries
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Balanced and Restorative Justice for Juveniles: A Framework for Juvenile Justice in the 21st Century      

# Balanced and Restorative Justice for Juveniles: A Framework for Juvenile Justice in the 21st Century

This document makes the case for a new mission for juvenile justice known as the "Balanced Approach," and advocates consideration of a new philosophical framework, "Restorative Justice," to guide broader policy development and reform in juvenile justice.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/framwork.pdf
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Good Behavior Game      

# Resource: Good Behavior Game

This report (PDF, 21 pages) summarizes the available evidence on the effects of Good Behavior Game on student and teacher outcomes. The Good Behavior Game is a classroom management strategy that aims to improve social skills, minimize disruptive behaviors, and create a positive learning environment. **Learn more.**
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10986 Summary Calendar

HARUN NASSOR TALIB, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; THE STATE OF TEXAS; JANICE WARDER, Judge of the 291st Judicial District, Defendants-Appellees.

------------------------------------- HARUN NASSOR TALIB, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-419-T

- - - - - - - - - - May 20, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *No. 96-10986 - 2 - Harun Nassor Talib, #689194, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his mixed civil rights/habeas corpus action.

Talib argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to dismiss from his habeas corpus petition his unexhausted claim of an unconstitutional search and seizure. Talib also argues the merits of his habeas corpus claim that his offense was misclassified as a second degree felony. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and conclude that the district court abused its discretion in implicitly denying Talib leave to dismiss from his habeas corpus petition his unexhausted claim of an unconstitutional search and seizure. See Hernandez v. Garrison , 916 F.2d 291, 293 (5th Cir. 1990); Rose v. Lundy , 455 U.S. 509, 520 (1982). The portion of the district court’s judgment denying Talib’s civil rights claims for damages as barred by Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994) is AFFIRMED. The portion of the judgment denying Talib’s motion to dismiss from his habeas petition his unexhausted claim is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court for the dismissal of Talib’s unexhausted habeas claim and for consideration of any remaining habeas claims. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1024 PLATE 14

+ INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY, 5 MILES

suNKHousE \ + +

1

82007
‘So

BUNKHOUSE

+ +

OFFICE

jessie

‘Scheelite ore
2. Sparsely distributed scheelite

JURASSIC OR CRETACEOUS

+ WATER TANK

——
Dashed where approximately located
Fault
Dashed where inferred
a
Strike and dip of schistosity

Be
Shaft

S4(—46)
—
Bureau of Mines diamond:<ril hole
Showing number, inclination, and direction

PRESS

Opencut

willy,
Dum

‘TRUE NORTH

SECTION THROUGH EAST RAISE (1942)

Geology end topography
‘and Clyde Wahrhaftg, 1942

by FM. Byers, J.

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE LINDEBORG SHEAR ZONE, RIVERSIDE MINE, HYDER DISTRICT, ALASKA

ne) = da

n L
‘Contour interval 50 feet
Datum approximate mean sea level

388407 © - 56 (In pocket }
Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT TO THE

PREMCOR PENSION RESTORATION PLAN



WHEREAS,
Premcor Inc. (Company) previously established the Premcor Pension Restoration Plan (Plan); and



WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section 7G therein; and



WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide for full vesting for certain employees terminated during
reductions in force, office and facility closings and job-function relocations;



NOW, THEREFORE, Section 4A is amended by adding the following to the end thereof:



In addition, the Restoration Account of a Participant whose employment with the Employer is involuntarily terminated:



| |  | between March 15, 2002 and March 31, 2003 as part of the cost-reduction initiated reduction in force at the general offices of the Employer or the shutdown of the Hartford facility
of the Employer;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | between October 1, 2002 and March 31, 2003 as part of the cost-reduction initiated reduction in force at the Port Arthur and Lima refinery facilities;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | during 2003 due to the relocation of such Participants Legal or Wholesale job function from the general offices of the Employer to Greenwich, Connecticut;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | during April 2003 due to a reduction in force at the Lima refinery facility; or
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | between June 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004 due to the closure of the St. Louis, Missouri general offices of the Employer,
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



shall be 100% vested and non-forfeitable upon such termination of
employment.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused
this amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer this 8th day of August, 2003.



PREMCOR INC.By:

/s/    James R. VossJames R. Voss, Senior
Vice-President
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 Certification
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)
 
 I,
        Beaufort J.B. Clarke, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ICON Capital
        Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Annual
        Report of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K/A
        for
        the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report") certify, pursuant to
        Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.  The
        Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m); and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Partnership.
 
 
 *Dated:*  *January
        17, 2007*
 
 */s/
        Beaufort J.B. Clarke*
 Beaufort
        J.B. Clarke
 Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
 ICON
        Capital Corp.
 General
        Partner of ICON Income Eight B L.P.
#### Erena Morisi et al., Respondents, v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant.

In an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation by the plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by her when struck by a “hit-and-run” motorist, and by the plaintiff husband for loss of services and. medical expenses, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 1963, which denied its motion, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the husband’s cause of action (the second cause of action) on the ground that he lacked the legal capacity to sue. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements and with leave to defendant to serve its answer within 20 days after entry of the order hereon. It appears evident from the intendment of the statute (Insurance Law, art. 17-A) that its purpose was to provide compensation through the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) to the extent that claims would be recognized and the claimants compensated as if the owner or driver of the vehicle causing the injury were insured (Cf. *Garcia*v. *Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Corp.,*18 A D 2d 62; *McCarthy*v. *Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Corp.,*16 A D 2d 35). In our opinion, there -is nothing contained in the statute which limits the maintenance of a cause of action against the MVAIC solely to the person who has received the “bodily injury” or to his legal representative, so as to exclude from its coverage a derivative cause of action for loss of services and medical expenses on behalf of a husband whose wife has been injured. The term “personal injury” as it is used in the statute (see Insurance Law, § 618) includes a cause of action for loss of services and medical expenses (General Construction Law, § 37-a; of. *Psota*v. *Long Is. Pi. It. Co.,*246 N. Y. 388; *Constantimides v. MaovhattoMi Tr. Co.,*264 App. Div. 147). It is “well settled that an injury, to a person within the meaning of the law does not necessarily involve the element of personal contact with the person complaining of the -injury” *(Riddle*v. *Macfadden,*201 N. Y. 215, 218). It is our opinion, therefore, that one having a derivative cause of action is a “ qualified person ” within the meaning of the statute (Insurance Law, art. 17-A). Beldock, P. J., Klein-feld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.