alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OZOLOUTIONS, INC

                              MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

Dear Mrs. Harland:

The  following consulting Agreement between Ozolutions, Inc. (The Company or OI)
and Harland McCall Inc. or HMI outlines the terms under which Betty Harland will
perform  the  consulting  services  for  the  company.

1.   Service:

     Chairman  &  CEO

     Betty Harland will perform consulting services as directed by the board of
     directors as defined here and in section five below.

2.   Term:

     The contract shall be for a term of sixty months (five years) commencing on
     the 1st day of October 2004.

3.   Compensation:

     a)   Fee of $US 220,000 annually, to be invoiced to the Company at the rate
          of $ 18,333.33 monthly. The Board of Directors will review this fee
          from time to time.

     b)   HMI and or Betty Harland will be granted $50,000 signing bonus.

     c)   Entitlement to a bonus of up to 50% of annual fee if and when granted
          by the Board of Directors subject to the achievement of annual
          performance criteria as approved by the Board.

     d)   HMI will invoice the company monthly for Mrs. Harland's out of pocket
          expenses such as travel, meals and entertainment and other such
          expenses related to the execution of his duties, including $1,000 per
          month as an automobile allowance.


<PAGE>
4.   Non competition:

     The Contract will contain the usual provision prohibiting you from
     competing with the company for a period of two (2) years from the expiry or
     termination of your services.

5.   Duties:

     Your duties shall include:

     -    Execute the company business plan and implement controls and
          procedures to insure structured company growth.
     -    Identify and perform due diligence of potential merger and
          acquisitions targets for Board of Directors review. Execute approved
          transactions as directed and integrate the new businesses into the
          company business plan
     -    Develop customer relations and awareness of the OI
     -    Develop and Maintain government public relations
     -    Any other duties as determined by the Board of Directors

6.   Termination for any reason:

     The Company shall have the right to terminate your contract at any time
     with a payment of twice the outstanding fee remaining on the term of the
     contract at the time of termination, plus a cash settlement of $1,000,000.
     The fee payments will be in the form of cash.

7.   Termination by consultant:

     The consultant shall provide a minimum of two (2) months notice prior to
     termination of the contract.

Please sign this letter below to indicate your agreement with the above terms.

Yours truly,



Max Weissengruber
President
Ozolutions Inc.

Agreed this 1st day of October 2004.


_____________________________
Harland McCall Inc.


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50827

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENT NIGEL WEST,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

(EP-95-CR-140)

______________________________________________

June 27, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kent Nigel West appeals his conviction and sentence for aiding

and abetting a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

cocaine. West challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of guilt.

Because a jury could rationally have found beyond a reasonable
2

doubt that West had associated with and participated in the

criminal enterprise, participated in the venture, and had sought by

his actions to make the venture succeed, we hold that the evidence

of guilt was sufficient to sustain the conviction. See United

States v. Martinez, 555 F.2d 1269, 1271 (5th Cir. 1977). 

West also challenges the district court's calculation of his

sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that the

district court did not err in refusing to award a downward

adjustment for acceptance of responsibility and did not commit

clear error in refusing to hold that West had a minimal role in the

criminal venture. See U.S.S.G. §§ 3B1.2, comment. (n.1), and

3E1.1, comment. (n.2); see also United States v. Zuniga, 18 F.3d

1254, 1260-61 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 214 (1994). 

AFFIRMED.
#### 742.1501 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT AND CFO (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)I, Robert Fowler, Senior Vice-President and CFO of Church Loans & Investments Trust certify that:1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Church Loans & Investments Trust;2.Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Trust Managers:(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.Dated: February 14, 2007/s/ Robert E. FowlerRobert E. Fowler, Senior Vice President and CFO
#### 450.201 Delegation of authority.

The Assistant Secretary for Administration is authorized to approve all actions under FAR part 50 except indemnification actions listed in FAR 50.201(d) which must be approved by the Secretary, without power of delegation.
----

----

| CLECO              CORPORATION |  EXHIBIT                32.1 |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------|

|   Cleco                  Corporation                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION                  PURSUANT TO                                      |
| 18                  U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                        |
| AS                  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                         |
| SECTION                  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                  2002 |

| (1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

| Date:  August                  1, 2007                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Michael                  H. Madison                                        |
| Michael                  H. MadisonPresident                  and Chief Executive Officer |

----

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BENEDICT MOHIT, Individually, and )

As Trustee for Gita Nagassar Mohit )

Family Trust, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4387

)

CITY OF HAINES CITY, a Political )

Subdivision of the State of Florida, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 24, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Steven L. Selph, Judge.

Benedict Mohit, pro se.

Fred Reilly, City Attorney for the City of 

Haines City, Florida, Haines City, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

December 8, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00016-CV

WENDY VAZQUEZ-BUEZO, Appellant

V.

RUSSELL GAMMEL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-13748

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 18, 2019. On November 

12, 2020, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise and Hassan.
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 135 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Improving Protections for Workers in Temporary Agricultural Employment in the United States’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida (for himself, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. 

GIMENEZ, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. CLINE, Mr. BEAN of Florida, Mr. 

DUNN of Florida, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. AUSTIN

SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. CARL, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, 

and Mr. MEUSER) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Labor relating to ‘‘Improving Protections for Workers in Temporary Agricultural Employment in the United States’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘Improving Protections for 

5 Workers in Temporary Agricultural Employment in the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 135 IH 

1 United States’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 33898 (April 29, 2024)), 

2 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
cosm_ex103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3

  

 

 

 


	 
	1

	


	 



 

 


	 
	2

	


	 



 

 


	 
	3

	


	 



 

 


	 
	4

	


	 



 

 


	 
	5
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Children's Health Insurance Program      

# Children's Health Insurance Program

The Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provides free or low-cost health coverage for more than 7 million children up to age 19. CHIP covers U.S. citizens and eligible immigrants.

https://www.insurekidsnow.gov
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Years: 2011 to 2011

Series ID

Qtr1

2011

Qtr2

2011

Qtr3

2011

Qtr4

2011

Annual

2011

LNS10000000Q 238852

LNU00000000Q 238852

LNS12500000Q 112597

LNU02500000Q 110763

LNS12600000Q 26955

LNU02600000Q 27454

LNS13000000Q 13693

LNU03000000Q 14513

LNS15000000Q 85572

LNU05000000Q 86121

LNU02500086Q 100

LNU02600086Q 1085

LNS13000086Q 538

LNU03000086Q 452

LNS10000012Q 16845

LNU00000012Q 16845

LNS12500012Q 1056

LNU02500012Q 817

LNS12600012Q 3216

LNU02600012Q 3179

LNS13000012Q 1418

LNU03000012Q 1309

LNS15000012Q 11100

LNU05000012Q 11541

LNU00024887Q 38195

LNS13024887Q 3740

LNU03024887Q 3689

LNU05024887Q 17823

LNU02500088Q 717

LNU02600088Q 2094

LNS13000088Q 883

LNU03000088Q 857

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (11:46:47 AM)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

LNU02500024Q 109946

LNU02600024Q 24276

LNS13000024Q 12275

LNU03000024Q 13204

LNU02500036Q 7773

LNU02600036Q 4914

LNS13000036Q 2321

LNU03000036Q 2380

LNU00000048Q 200657

LNU02500048Q 102174

LNU02600048Q 19361

LNS13000048Q 9966

LNU03000048Q 10824

LNU00024932Q 21083

LNU03024932Q 1837

LNU05024932Q 4008

LNS13000089Q 3109

LNU03000089Q 3350

LNU00000060Q 124640

LNU02500060Q 80394

LNU02600060Q 12753

LNS13000060Q 8006

LNU03000060Q 8702

LNU05000060Q 22791

LNU00024933Q 20038

LNU03024933Q 1513

LNU05024933Q 3603

LNU00024934Q 19142

LNU03024934Q 1292

LNU05024934Q 3339

LNS13000091Q 2404

LNU03000091Q 2604

LNU00024935Q 20445

LNU03024935Q 1312

LNU05024935Q 3405

LNU00024936Q 21946

LNU03024936Q 1461

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (11:46:47 AM)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

LNU05024936Q 3852

LNS13000093Q 2493

LNU03000093Q 2749

LNU00024937Q 21986

LNU03024937Q 1288

LNU05024937Q 4583

LNU00024230Q 76017

LNU02524230Q 21780

LNU02624230Q 6608

LNS13024230Q 1984

LNU03024230Q 2122

LNU05024230Q 45507

LNU03000095Q 1669

LNU03000097Q 453

LNU00024938Q 12322

LNU03024938Q 271

LNU05024938Q 8287

LNU00024941Q 9234

LNU03024941Q 102

LNU05024941Q 7568

LNU00024942Q 17855

LNU03024942Q 79

LNU05024942Q 16592

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (11:46:47 AM)
Exhibit 10.8


 


 






     

     


    

 


 



    	 	2	 



     


    

 









    	 	3	 



     


    

 


 


 






    	 	4	 



     


    

 


 


5
(January 13, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Benjamin Brown, Defendant.

Motion by defendant to dispense with printing on appeal from an order denying his motion for a transcript of the trial minutes relating to his judgment of conviction. Motion denied; no appeal lies from such an order (see *People*v. *Popolo,*12 A D 2d 949). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Robert Tiger et al., Respondents, v. Robert E. Herman, as State Rent Administrator, Appellant, and Jack Eisenstein, Intervenor-Respondent.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review and annul a determination of the State Rent Administrator, dated May 25,1960, which denied petitioners’ (landlords’) protest and affirmed the Local Rent Administrator’s order denying their application for decontrol of a housing accommodation on the ground of owner-occupancy under subdivision 11 of section 9 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, the State Rent Administrator appeals from three separate orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, as follows: (1) an order, dated January 3, 1961, which annulled the State Rent Administrator’s determination and directed a certificate of decontrol to issue (28 Mise 2d 1008); (2) an order, dated February 7, 1961, which granted the tenant-intervenor’s motion for reargument, but adhered to the original decision; and (3) an order, dated March 17, 1961, which granted the State Rent Administrator’s subsequent motion to resettle the said order of February 7, 1961 so as to correct its recitals. Order dated March 17, 1961 affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeals from orders dated January 3, 1961 and February 7, 1961, dismissed, without costs. Such orders were superseded by the subsequent order of March 17,1961 *(Sugarman*v. *Froom,*8 A D 2d 857; *Matter of Lee,*6 A D 2d 897; cf. *Manfra*v. *City of New York,*6 A D 2d 817). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
(October 30, 1964)

#### In the Matter of James T. Stevens, Petitioner, v. Charles Marks, as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss petition granted and proceeding unanimously dismissed, without costs. When petitioner, a lieutenant in the Police Department of the City of New York, first -appeared before the Grand Jury of New York County—which was investigating allegations of bribery and corruption in the Police Department— he signed a limited waiver of immunity. When recalled before that Grand Jury on July. 22, 1964, petitioner refused to answer any questions claiming his privilege against self incrimination. Petitioner was then brought before a Justice of the Supreme Court who directed petitioner to answer. When petitioner persisted in his refusal to answer, he was held in criminal contempt and sentenced accordingly. Petitioner attacks the validity of the waiver of immunity he signed, and contends that in the absence of a valid waiver he was within his constitutional rights in refusing to answer before the Grand Jury. The adjudication for contempt must be sustained, however, irrespective of any substance to petitioner’s argument as to the continued effectiveness of the waiver of immunity. In *Regan*v. *New York*(349 U. S. 58) it was clearly held that one circumstanced as petitioner herein was required to *684testify before the Grand Jury. If the waiver were invalid, petitioner would have received immunity from prosecution under sections 381 and 2447 of the Penal .Law. On the other hand, if the waiver of immunity is still valid, petitioner no ¡longer has any privilege to refuse to testify. Hence, the claimed invalidity ¡of the waiver would be a defense in any subsequent prosecution but not a sufficient excuse to refuse to testify. In view of our conclusion that *Regan*v. *New York*is controlling here, we do not reach the question as to the effect of *Malloy*v. *Hogan*(378 U. S. 1) and *Escobedo*v. *Illinois*(378 U. S. 478) on the constitutionality of section 6 of article I of the New York State Constitution and section 1123 of the New York City Charter, which require a public servant to testify in any investigation involving hig official acts or to forfeit his position. That problem may become pertinent] if and -when petitioner has testified,_\| and it must be determined whether he hás"a'ecordingly received immunity ór has effectively waived immunity. Concur — Breitel, J. P. Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
725.704 Geographic Code waivers. ( a ) Authority to approve waivers of source, nationality, and transportation services requirements, pursuant to 22 CFR part 228, subpart D, is set forth in ADS Chapters 103 and 310.
( b ) If a Geographic Code other than Code 937 is authorized by a waiver, the contracting officer must insert the authorized geographic code approved in the waiver, in the Schedule of the contract as required in 725.702. In addition, the contracting officer must place a copy of the approved geographic code waiver in the official contract file.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00152

- CV

IN RE CHARLIE DOESCH ER, PAT DOESCHER, APACHE IRO N
METAL & AUTO SALVAGE , INC.,
APACHE IRON METAL & AUTO SALVAGE, INC. D/B/A APACHE TRUCK & VAN PARTS, G ERALD
COYEL AKA " JERRY CO YEL "
D/B/A APACHE TRUCK & VAN PARTS, JAMES COYEL D/B/A
APACHE TRUCK & VAN P ARTS,
AND SHANNON COYEL RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered r elators’ petition for writ of mandamu s and

motion for emergency stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.

Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency

stay are denied.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GARDNER and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: Ap ril 17, 2012
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 4, 2009