alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the Chesapeake Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended October 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chesapeake Corporation.  
/s/ Andrew J. Kohut 
Date:  April 10, 2006
Andrew J. Kohut 
President & Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)           
/s/ Joel K. Mostrom 
Date:  April 10, 2006
Joel K. Mostrom 
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)                
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Chesapeake Corporation and will be retained by Chesapeake Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     ******
<Page>


                                                      Exhibit 99.01

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citicorp (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Victor J. Menezes, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Todd S.
Thomson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


/s/ Victor J. Menezes
---------------------------
Victor J. Menezes
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002

/s/ Todd S. Thomson
---------------------------
Todd S. Thomson
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### People of the State of Illinois ex rel. John Rusch, Appellee, v. Alious Johnson et al., Appellants.

Gen. No. 41,118.

opinion filed January 20, 1941;

rehearing denied February 5, 1941.

Myer H. Gladstone, for certain appellant; Elliodor M. Libonati, for certain other appellants; Abraham Miller, of counsel; Thomas J. Courtney, State's Attorney,’for appellee; John F. Cashen, Jr., of counsel.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice O'Connor.

“Hot to be published in full.”
SEC Connect





 






Exhibit 10.1



 


AMENDMENT
NO. 2


TO
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


 


This
Amendment No. 2 to Convertible Promissory Note (the
“Amendment”) is
entered into as of May 10, 2017 by and between ImageWare Systems,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Charles Crocker,
or his registered assigns (“Holder”). Unless otherwise
specified herein, all capitalized terms set forth in this Amendment
shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Note.


 



RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, On March 9, 2016, the Company
issued to Holder a Convertible Promissory Note (the
“Note”) in the
principal amount of $0.5 million. . The Note was amended pursuant
to Amendment No. 1 to Convertible Promissory Note, dated January
23, 2017 (“Amendment No.
1”), (together, the “Note Amendments”);
and


 


WHEREAS, Holder and the Company now
desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date, as defined in
the Note


 



AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the undersigned parties agree as
follows:


 


1.           The
Maturity Date, as such term is defined in the Note, as amended,
shall be December 31, 2018.


 


2.           The
provisions of the Note, as amended in this Amendment, shall remain
in full force and effect in accordance with their terms and are
hereby ratified and confirmed. In the event of any conflict between
the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and
conditions set forth in the Note and the Note Amendments, the terms
and conditions set forth herein shall control. This Amendment shall
be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard
to the conflict of laws provisions thereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has caused this Amendment to be duly executed by its
officers, thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above
written.


 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	


THE COMPANY:


	
 

	

   


	
 

	


ImageWare Systems, INC.,


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	

By:

	
/s/ Wayne
Wetherell



	
 

	

Name:

	

Wayne
Wetherell





	
 

	

Title:

	

CFO





	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	


HOLDER:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	

By:

	
/s/ Charles
Crocker



	
 

	

Name:

	

Charles
Crocker
#### Manuel ZAMBRANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 74-3042

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 4, 1975.

James H. Randals, Staff Counsel for Inmates, TDC, Huntsville, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.

John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., Andrew W. Carruthers, Merrill Finnell, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appel-lee.

Before COLEMAN, AINSWORTH and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, represented by court-appointed counsel, was convicted by a jury of rape and sentenced to fifty years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed in Zambrano v. State, 478 S.W.2d 500 (Tex.Cr.App., 1972).

In his habeas petition appellant raised grounds for relief which had been presented on direct appeal. He contended that after a jury had been impanelled to try him and two co-defendants, one of the co-defendants, Castillo, entered a plea of guilty in the jury’s presence. Appellant moved for a mistrial, which was denied. Castillo moved for a severance, which was denied. The appellant objected to any further proceedings on the guilty plea conducted in the jury’s presence. The objection was overruled. Appellant contends that Castillo’s guilty plea so prejudiced the jury against him as to deprive him of a fair trial.

The District Court denied the petition, finding that although the trial court erred in denying the mistrial, the evidence against appellant was so strong that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

In Loftis v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1971, 450 F.2d 599, this Court held that error in allowing a co-defendant to plead guilty in the jury’s presence is harmless if the evidence leaves no room for any reasonable doubt as to guilt. See, also, Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969); Stubbs v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1972, 468 F.2d 248.

In the present case, a reading of the trial transcript reveals such overwhelming evidence of guilt as to leave no room for reasonable doubt. As the District Court found, the victims were subjected to an ordeal of several hours by the defendants; identification was positive; the victims also identified the automobile; the defendants offered no defense.

The denial of habeas relief is

Affirmed.
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1




November 4, 2009




Mr. John G. Duffy

c/o KBW, Inc.

787 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10019




Dear John:




     Reference is hereby made to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between KBW,
Inc. and you, dated as December 31, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”). This letter confirms the
agreement between KBW, Inc. and you to amend the Employment Agreement to extend the Employment
Period (as defined in the Employment Agreement) to January 31, 2010, and, subject to your execution
of this letter below, hereby so amends the Employment Agreement.



     Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof.



Very truly yours,




KBW, INC.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Mitchell Kleinman
 	 	 
	 	Name:  	Mitchell Kleinman 	 	 
	 	Title:  	General Counsel 	 	 
	 



Acknowledged & agreed:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ John G. Duffy
 	 	Date:  November 4, 2009 
	JOHN G. DUFFY
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Productive Partnerships with Youth and Families: Commitment to Lived Expertise      

# Resource: Productive Partnerships with Youth and Families: Commitment to Lived Expertise

This video explores how child welfare professionals and agencies can increase commitment to true partnership with people with lived expertise. It shares that simple presence is step one and should initiate the next steps of training, support, and development of a supportive environment. The video helps agencies grow their capacity to authentically partner with young people and families, share success stories, engage in problem solving and action planning, and establish fair compensation.  

An accompanying discussion guide is provided. **Learn more.**
#### 608.7001 Definitions.

*Official vehicle* means a U.S. Government-owned or leased motor vehicle that is fueled by petroleum or electric batteries, has a minimum of four wheels, and is designed primarily for use on highways, such as sedans, station wagons, buses, carryalls, and trucks.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 33 (Monday, February 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10590-10591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03438]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; CURE Research Consortium 
Review.
    Date: March 17-18, 2021.

[[Page 10591]]

    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ann A. Jerkins, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7119, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-2242, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6ccc3d4cdcfc8d5c7e6c8cfc2c2cd88c8cfce88c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff959a8d9496918c9ebf91969b9b94d1919697d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 16, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-03438 Filed 2-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 100
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2023

 Received; read twice and placed on the calendar, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
                                 802(f)

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, 
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to ``Factoring Criteria for 
             Firearms with Attached `Stabilizing Braces'''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and 
Explosives relating to ``Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached 
`Stabilizing Braces''' (ATF final rule 2021R-08F), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Kevin F. McCumber,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 100

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, 
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to ``Factoring Criteria for 
             Firearms with Attached `Stabilizing Braces'''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 13, 2023

 Received; read twice and placed on the calendar, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
                                 802(f)
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 538

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 538 appear at 69 FR 28065, May 18, 2004.

#### 538.7200 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Order-level materials* means supplies and/or services acquired in direct support of an individual task or delivery order placed against an authorized (see GSAR 538.7201(b) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contract or FSS Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA)), when the supplies and/or services are not known at the time of Schedule contract or FSS BPA award. The prices of order-level materials are not established in the FSS contract or FSS BPA. However, order-level materials are purchased under the authority of the FSS program, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 152(3), and are not open market items, which are discussed in FAR 8.402(f).
#### 603.906 Remedies.

The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 3.906.
#### Frances W. Hadersbeck, Appellant, v William D. Hadersbeck, Respondent.

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered June 6,1978 in Albany County, which directed plaintiff to enter and serve a previously granted judgment of divorce upon the defendant. The plaintiff contends that there has been a denial of her right to due process because the court did not give her adequate notice of a fact-finding hearing. The plaintiff has not raised any question as to the propriety of the procedure involved herein. The record establishes that as to the factual issue which the court undertook to determine, and in its decision regarding the defendant’s compliance with a stipulation, there was inadequate notice. The plaintiff has not shown that she is in any way directly aggrieved by the order which requires her to enter and serve the judgment of divorce and also directs the defendant to deliver a deed and a specific sum of money. However, the failure of adequate notice requires that the order be modified so as to not prejudice the plaintiff in any other respect or future proceedings. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding a further decretal paragraph: "Ordered, that as to any matters other than the delivery of the deed and sum of money specified in this order, this order is without prejudice to any right of the plaintiff to seek enforcement of any and all separation agreements and/or stipulations between the parties in regard to said divorce”, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Frank Briganti. (B) The People of the State of New York v. Alexander Keitt.

[In each action] Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
#### 602.101-70 DOSAR definitions.

For the purposes of the DOSAR, unless otherwise indicated, the following terms have the meanings set forth in this subpart.

*Chief of Mission* means the principal officer in charge of a diplomatic mission of the United States or of a United States office abroad which is designated by the Secretary of State as diplomatic in nature, including any individual assigned under section 502(c) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-465) to be temporarily in charge of such a mission or office.

*Consolidated Receiving Point* or *CRP* ; means the contractor under contract to a Despatch Agency to receive and prepare items for shipment to a post. The CRP receives, records, consolidates, and packs items for shipment overseas under the direction of the Despatch Agency.

*Department* or *DOS* means the Department of State, including all of its activities wherever located.

*Despatch Agency* means the office responsible for the transportation of supplies between the U.S. and posts within its specific geographic area as assigned by the Office of Logistics Operations. There are six Despatch Agencies, one each in Iselin, New Jersey; Baltimore, Maryland; Miami, Florida; Seattle, Washington; Brownsville, Texas; and the European Logistical Support Office in Antwerp, Belgium.

*Government* means the Government of the United States of America unless specifically stated otherwise.

*Major system* has the same definition as described in FAR 2.101; however, the Department of State's dollar threshold as defined in paragraph (2) is $30 million. The Under Secretary for Management is the head of the agency for the purposes of paragraph (3).

*Overseas post* means a “post” located outside the United States of America.

*Post* means a diplomatic or consular mission of the United States of America, administered or managed by the DOS.

[53 FR 26163, July 11, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 66753, Dec. 28, 1994; 60 FR 39662, Aug. 3, 1995; 64 FR 43620, Aug. 11, 1999; 69 FR 19330, Apr. 13, 2004; 72 FR 45695, Aug. 15, 2007]
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-20521 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE BENITO ALVAREZ, also known as Benito Alvarez, also known as Benito Iraheta-Alvarez, also known as Benito Iraheta Alvarez, Defendant-Appellant Cons. w/ No. 12-40819 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. BENITO IRAHETA-ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-398-1 USDC No. 1:12-CR-289-1 U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk Case: 12-20521 Document: 00512277995 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013No. 12-20521 c/w No. 12-40819 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Benito IrahetaAlvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in a ccordance with Anders v. C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Iraheta-Alvarez has fil ed a response. We h ave r eviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the r ecord reflected therein, as well

as Iraheta-Alvarez’s r esponse. We concur with c o unsel’s assessment th a t the appeals present n o nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Acco rdingly,

c o u nsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused fro m further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R

. 42.2.

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. 2 Case: 12-20521 Document: 00512277995 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013