alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                       1,460,689
<SECURITIES>                                   278,563
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,086,893
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,349,525)
<INVENTORY>                                 29,890,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            75,562,704
<PP&E>                                      14,868,199
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,128,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             247,474,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      130,317,595
<BONDS>                                     50,156,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,474,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               247,474,375
<SALES>                                     79,600,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            79,600,935
<CGS>                                       62,039,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,220,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,603,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,286,710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,286,710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,286,710)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                7,069,413
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        

</TABLE>
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

**Who May Apply: (specifically)** The Special Olympics organization may apply. 

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Jagged
Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 30, 2011, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 29, 2012

|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Albert Narvades    
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

**Form 10-KSB/A
            [X]     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

                                                      **For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003**

            [   ]    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

                                                     For the transition period from ____________ to ____________ 
Commission File Number: 0-14793 TEKNOWLEDGE CORPORATION 
*(Name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)*

**Delaware                                                                                                       94-2760916****
#### 52.247-57 Transportation Transit Privilege Credits.

As prescribed in 47.305-13(b)(4), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when supplies are of such a nature, or when it is the custom of the trade, that offerors may have potential transit credits available and the Government may reduce transportation costs through the use of transit credits:

# Transportation Transit Privilege Credits (APR 1984)

(a) If the offeror has established with regulated common carriers transit privileges that can be applied to the supplies when shipped from the original source, the offeror is invited to propose to use these credits for shipping the supplies to the designated Government destinations. The offeror will ship these supplies under commercial bills of lading, paying all remaining transportation charges connected with the shipment, subject to reimbursement by the Government in an amount equal to the remaining charges but not exceeding the amount quoted by the offeror.

(b) After loading on the carrier's equipment and acceptance by the carrier, these shipments under paid commercial bills of lading will move for the account of and at the risk of the Government (unless, pursuant to the Changes clause, the office administering the contract directs use of Government bills of lading).

(c) The amount quoted below by the offeror represents the transportation costs in cents per 100 pounds (freight rate) for full carload/truckload shipments of the supplies from offeror's original source, via offeror's transit plant or point, to the Government destination(s) including the carrier's transit privilege charge, less the applicable transit credit (i.e., the amount (rate) initially paid to the carrier for shipment from original source to offeror's transit plant or point).

(d) The rate per CWT quoted will be used by the Government to evaluate the offered f.o.b. origin price unless a lower rate is applicable on the date of bid opening (or closing date specified for receipt of offers). To have the offer evaluated on this basis, the offeror must insert below the remaining transportation charges that the offeror agrees to pay, including any transit charges, subject to reimbursement by the Government, as explained in this clause, to destinations listed in the Schedule as follows:

RATE PER CWT IN CENTS

TO DESTINATION

(End of clause)
423.405 Procedures. ( a ) The threshold of purchase for EPA designated items is $10,000 per year at the USDA departmental, not individual agency, level. Therefore, the APP requirements above, including the 100% purchase requirement, apply at the individual agency and staff office level.
( b ) Contracting officers should refer to EPA's list of designated products and products identified as recycled content when purchasing supplies or services. Information on EPA designated products is available at: *www.epa.gov/cpg/products.htm .*
( c ) All agencies and USDA Contracting Officers must take necessary actions to carry out the provisions of the USDA APP policy described in this subpart.
Discretionary Grants
#### 570.113 Disclosure of mistakes after award.

If a mistake in a lessor's offer is discovered after award, the contracting officer should process it substantially in accordance with FAR 14.407-4 and GSAM 514.407-4.

[76 FR 30850, May 27, 2011]
#### 49.602-2 Inventory forms.

Standard Form (SF) 1428, Inventory Disposal Schedule, and SF 1429, Inventory Disposal Schedule—Continuation Sheet, shall be used to support settlement proposals submitted on the forms specified in 49.602-1(b) and (d).

[69 FR 17748, Apr. 5, 2004]
#### 52.204-17 Ownership or Control of Offeror.

As prescribed in 4.1804(b), use the following provision:

# Ownership or Control of Offeror (AUG 2020)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this provision—

*Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code* means—

(1) An identifier assigned to entities located in the United States or its outlying areas by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch to identify a commercial or government entity by unique location; or

(2) An identifier assigned by a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or by the NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) to entities located outside the United States and its outlying areas that the DLA Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch records and maintains in the CAGE master file. This type of code is known as a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) code.

*Highest-level owner* means the entity that owns or controls an immediate owner of the offeror, or that owns or controls one or more entities that control an immediate owner of the offeror. No entity owns or exercises control of the highest level owner.

*Immediate owner* means an entity, other than the offeror, that has direct control of the offeror. Indicators of control include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: Ownership or interlocking management, identity of interests among family members, shared facilities and equipment, and the common use of employees.

(b) The Offeror represents that it [_] has or [_] does not have an immediate owner. If the Offeror has more than one immediate owner (such as a joint venture), then the Offeror shall respond to paragraph (c) and if applicable, paragraph (d) of this provision for each participant in the joint venture.

(c) If the Offeror indicates “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, enter the following information:

Immediate owner CAGE code:

Immediate owner legal name:

(*Do not use a “doing business as” name*)

Is the immediate owner owned or controlled by another entity?: [_] Yes or [_] No.

(d) If the Offeror indicates “yes” in paragraph (c) of this provision, indicating that the immediate owner is owned or controlled by another entity, then enter the following information:

Highest-level owner CAGE code:

Highest-level owner legal name:

(Do not use a “doing business as” name)

(End of provision)

[79 FR 31192, May 30, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 45867, July 14, 2016; 85 FR 40064, July 2, 2020]
# C_2018211EN.01000101.xml

| 18.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 211/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 200, 11.6.2018

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 190, 4.6.2018

OJ C 182, 28.5.2018

OJ C 166, 14.5.2018

OJ C 161, 7.5.2018

OJ C 152, 30.4.2018

OJ C 142, 23.4.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Jagged
Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 30, 2011, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 29, 2012

|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Paul Demirdjian    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Share with Youth: Helping Teens Find Their Right Job      

# Share with Youth: Helping Teens Find Their Right Job

This website provides career, training, and job search information to job seekers, including various career options and steps to take to obtain a job. The “Students and Career Advisors” section can help students discover their passions, research occupations that might be a good fit, and plan and execute a job search. **Learn more.**
THIRD AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE BENEFITS AGREEMENT

 

	THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE BENEFITS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of April 22, 2003, between **CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION**, a Virginia corporation (the "Company"), and **THOMAS H. JOHNSON** (the "Executive").

	**WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive entered into an Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement dated as of July 17, 1997; which Agreement was amended by a First Amendment to Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement on September 13, 1999, and by a Second Amendment to Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement on August 28, 2001; and

	**WHEREAS**, the Board of Directors and the Executive Compensation Committee ("Committee") of the Board of Directors desire to further amend the Agreement.

	**NOW, THEREFORE**, the Agreement is hereby amended in the following respects:

Section 4(a) of the Agreement is amended to replace the first sentence thereof with the following:			

	(a)	Pay the Executive as compensation for his services hereunder a cash amount on an annual base salary of not less than six hundred forty-two thousand, nine hundred dollars ($642,900) (which base salary shall be reviewed on an annual basis for possible increase in light of business conditions, competitive considerations, increases given to other employees of the Company and the Executive's performance, provided that such salary shall not be reduced below the salary in effect immediately prior to such review).

Except as provided above, the terms of the Agreement, dated July 17, 1997, and the terms of the First Amendment to Employment Severance Benefits Agreement, dated September 19, 1999, and the Second Amendment to Employment Severance Benefits Agreement, dated August 28, 2001, shall remain in effect.

	**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has cause this Second Amendment to Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement to be duly executed on its behalf and the Executive has duly executed this Second Amendment to Employment and Severance Benefits Agreement, all as of the date first written above.

EXECUTIVE						CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION

/s/ Thomas H. Johnson		/s/ Richard G. Tilghman	
Thomas H. Johnson	Richard G. Tilghman

	Director

	/s/ J.P. Causey Jr.		
	J.P. Causey Jr.

	Executive Vice President, Secretary &

	General Counsel
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER004678      

# PPRER004678

Weed, S. E., Birch, P. J., Ericksen, I. H.,  Olsen, J. A. (2011). Testing a predictive model of youth sexual intercourse initiation. Unpublished manuscript.

ModerateQuasi-experimental study that met all criteria for a moderate rating; findings show a positive, statistically significant impact for at least one behavioral outcome

### Program Information

### Evaluation Setting

### Study Sample

### Research Design

### Study Findings
#### CONROY v. ACKEN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 29, 1905.)

Action by Bridget Conroy, as administratrix, etc., of Michael Conroy, deceased, against Samuel I. Acken and others.

No opinion. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the question in whose service the-respondent’s engineer was engaged at the time of the accident should have been submitted on the proof to the jury.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50021 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN PAUL RODRIGUEZ, also known as Juan Pablo

- Rodriguez, also known as Juan Pablo Rodriguez, also known as John Paul Rodriguez, also known as John P. Rodriguez, also known as Juan P. Rodriguez, also known as Juan Rodriguez, also known as Juan Rodriguez

- Pablo , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:14

- CR

- 632

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Following a bench trial, Juan Paul Rodriguez was convicted of having been unlawfully present in the United States after removal, and he was
sentenced to 46 months of imprisonment . On appeal, Rodriguez, who was arrested following an immigration inspection stop, claims that the evidence

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 29, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50021 Document: 00513815702 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/29/2016No. 16

- 50021

2 obtained by B order Patrol agents

— including his verbal statements, his fingerprints, and his A

- file

— should have been suppressed as fruits of an illegal seizure. Accordingly , he contends that the district court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress. As Rodri guez concedes, even assuming that the immigration stop was illegal, his argument that the district court should have suppressed his identity evidence is foreclosed. See United States v. Hernandez

- Mandujano , 721 F.3d 345, 348, 351 (5th Cir. 2013) ; United S tates v. Roque

- Villanueva , 175 F.3d 345, 346 (5th Cir. 1999). Rodriguez asks this court to adopt precedent that recognizes the suppression of an alien’s identity evidence when it is discovered after an illegal detention. However, we may not overrule a prior decision of another panel in the absence of an intervening contrary or superseding decision by this court sitting en banc or by the Supreme Court. United States v. Traxler , 764 F.3d 486, 489 (5th Cir. 2014). AFFIRMED. Case: 16-50021 Document: 00513815702 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/29/2016