alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 11378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 11, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 
317-3087.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 
2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Fred Smith. For more information please contact Fred Smith at 
1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at 
the website: http://www.improveirs.org.

    Dated: February 18, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-03733 Filed 2-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10244 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10244

  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
  improve outreach and education on employee ownership, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2024

Ms. Velazquez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
  improve outreach and education on employee ownership, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving SBA Engagement on Employee 
Ownership Act''.

SEC. 2. COOPERATIVE WORKING GROUP PARTICIPATION.

    Section 7(a)(35) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(35)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Working groups and other engagements.--The 
                Administrator (or a designee thereof) shall attend any 
                working groups, meetings, fora, and any other 
                engagements on cooperatives or employee ownership of 
                business concerns that are hosted by any other Federal 
                agency or office--
                            ``(i) to which the Administrator (or 
                        designee thereof) is invited; or
                            ``(ii) with which the Administrator (or a 
                        designee thereof) has had a previous engagement 
                        or relationship.''.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT COMPANY PROGRAM 
              OUTREACH.

    Section 862(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115-232; 15 U.S.C. 648 note) is 
amended by inserting ``, and to the investors and limited partners of 
such companies,'' before ``to increase''.

SEC. 4. OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall carry 
out the requirements of section 862(e) of the John S. McCain National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115-232; 15 
U.S.C. 648 note) through the Small Business Employee Ownership and 
Cooperatives Promotion Program of the Administration.
                                 <all>
```
SCWC-13-0005192

Kirk M. Lankford

petitioner pro se Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0005192

24-AUG-2015

11:09 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

CORINNE GRACE LANKFORD,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

KIRK MATTHEW LANKFORD,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0005192 ; FC-D NO. 08-1-2336)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Kirk Matthew Lankford’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on July 10, 2015, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, August 24, 2015.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002










Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:






The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as applicable, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













Dated:
August 10, 2012

/s/ Michael Wellesley-WesleyMichael Wellesley-WesleyPresident andPrincipal Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Mid-Island Hospital, Respondent, v. George K. Wyman, as Commissioner of Social Welfare of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.

Motion [No. 2119] by George K. Wyman, Commissioner of Social Welfare of the State of New York, to stay enforcement of judgment (or order), pending his appeal therefrom, or in the alternative, to enlarge his time to comply with the directions contained therein, granted to the extent of enlarging his time; the time of said Commissioner to comply with the directions is enlarged until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. In all other respects, the motion is denied on the ground that the determination is not appealable as of right (see decision herewith on Motion No. 2119-A). Cross motion [No. 2119-A] by petitioner to dismiss the appeal taken by George K. Wyman, Commissioner of Social Welfare of the State of New York, granted; appeal dismissed, without costs. In our opinion the determination here sought to be reviewed is not the judgment contemplated by statute (CPLR 411, 7806), but an order from which an appeal does not lie as of right (CPLR 5701, subd. [b]). Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit        13(a)(i)**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350 **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                           |                                  |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                           |
|                                  |                                      |                             |
| Date: October                13, 2005 | By:                                  | /s/ M.                Glen Kertz |
|                                       |                                                |
|                                       | M.                  Glen KertzActing President |

----
# C_2020211EN.01001201.xml

| 25.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/12

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2020/C 211/10)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AST-SC/10/20 – SECRETARIES (SC 1/SC 2)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 211 A of 25 June 2020.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice:11364]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Soutine/de Kooning: Conversations in Paint” at The Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Matthew R. Lussenhop,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-03638 Filed 2-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Amare Zeleke HABTEMARIAM, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-1926.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 14, 2008.

Decided: June 17, 2008.

Oti W. Nwosu, The Law Office of Oti W. Nwosu, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, William C. Minick, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Amare Zeleke Habtemariam, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review.

We review the Board’s decision to deny a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. *INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007). A motion for reconsideration asserts that the Board made an error in its earlier decision, *Turri v. INS,*997 F.2d 1306, 1311 n. 4 (10th Cir.1993), and requires the movant to specify the *error of*fact or law in the prior Board decision. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (2007); Matter *of Cerna,*20 I. & N. Dec. 399, 402 (B.I.A.1991) (noting that a motion to reconsider questions a decision for alleged errors in appraising the facts and the law). The burden is on the movant to establish that reconsideration is warranted. *INS v. Abudu,*485 U.S. 94, 110-11, 108 S.Ct. 904, 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988). “To be "within a mile of being granted, a motion for reconsideration has to give the tribunal to which it is addressed a reason for *217changing its mind.” *Ahmed v. Ashcroft,*388 F.3d 247, 249 (7th Cir.2004). Motions that simply repeat contentions that have already been rejected are insufficient to convince the Board to reconsider a previous decision. *Id.*

We find the Board did not abuse its discretion. Habtemariam’s motion to reconsider merely repeated his claims that he was entitled to have his removal proceedings reopened because he had entered into a good faith marriage to a United States citizen and because of changed conditions in Ethiopia. He also failed to address the immigration judge’s adverse credibility finding, which the Board had found was not clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, we deny Habtemariam’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1009 PLATE 9

Not mapped

EXPLANATION
Fault, showing relative movement,
dashed where approximately located

v

‘Not mapped

Reverse fault, dashed where
approximately located; U, upthrown plate

—2
Strike and dip of fracture,
dashed where approximately located

2 aos

has no genetic significance

point of observation. ‘The
fact that no displac

Strike of vertical fracture,
dashed where approximately located

Extended into wall beyond

Or
Survey station

60 Feet

Geology by A. F. Trites, Jr. and R. T. Chew 3d
“August-September 1952

MAP SHOWING FRACTURES AND "FAULTS, HAPPY JACK MINE,
SAN JUAN COUNTY, UTAH sears 0-55 (tn pots No 2

Surveyed by A. F. Trites, Jr. and B. L. Renzetti
# C_2020148EN.01000201.xml

| 5.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 May 2020

Euro exchange rates (2)

4 May 2020

(2020/C 148/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0942 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4622 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87898 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8113 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0548 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 159,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,3280 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,119 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 353,27 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5668 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8368 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,6932 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7022 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5390 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4838 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8083 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5495 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 340,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,3924 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7275 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5820 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 522,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7226 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,379 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,3404 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,397 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0781 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 26,8862 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,7870 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0942

JPY

Japanese yen

116,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4622

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87898

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8113

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0548

ISK

Iceland króna

159,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,3280

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,119

HUF

Hungarian forint

353,27

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5668

RON

Romanian leu

4,8368

TRY

Turkish lira

7,6932

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7022

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5390

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4838

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8083

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5495

KRW

South Korean won

1 340,00

ZAR

South African rand

20,3924

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7275

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5820

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 522,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7226

PHP

Philippine peso

55,379

RUB

Russian rouble

82,3404

THB

Thai baht

35,397

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0781

MXN

Mexican peso

26,8862

INR

Indian rupee

82,7870

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 

**- 2359** 

BERNARD OBI EFFIOM

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition d ismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director,
Christina Bechak Parascandola , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., f or Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Bernard Obi Effiom, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“Board”) order denying his motion to reopen hi s case sua

sponte. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011). We lack j urisdiction

to review the Board’ s refusal to exercise its sua sponte

authority to reopen and therefore dismiss the petition for

review. See Mosere v. Mukasey , 552 F.3d 397, 400

– 01 (4th Cir.

20 09).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BULLETIN 1024 PLATE 12

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

EXPLANATION
on 500-FOOT LEVEL
Contact, showing dip
Dashed where approximately located
oo
Faull, showing dip
Dashed where approximately located

Graywacke an

Vertical fault
Deshed where approximately located

CLAIM MAP

Dota from original claim map furnished
by RADCO, Inc. ond potent survey
plots 1952

{Claim tocotions approximate only)

400 Q 1700 Feet

—_— Fault zone, showing dip

tee

Strike and dip of beds a:
90 /
ae /
Strike of vertical beds / /

EXPLANATION
>
Portal of ait

75) if
‘Strike and dip of cleavage pen fe

Disseminated ore
Density of stippling indicates relative grade a!
Strike and dip of joints

400-FOOT LEVEL,

20

anit
‘Strike of vertical joints

Portal of adit
Foot of raise
500-FOOT LEVEL.

CSCC

Inclined workings
Cheerans point down

Bulkhead

S sole
S :

wet
S (iss
iy - ‘Workings projected to plane of section
Ry
470 FEET
‘ge 400-FOOT LEVEL

Altitude of portal (aneroid)
‘Datum is mean sea level

No, 202

‘Number assigned to mine workings,
‘data from original manne map

DN 505 XGW 560

[Numbers assigned to mine
working of this report

‘400-FOOT LEVEL,

500-FOOT LEVEL

”,

7

400-FOOT LeveL

ly

NMR

CS

x

400-FOOT LEVEL

470,
FEET’

Zz

400-FOOT LEVEL fi / /
/ /

400-FOOT LEVEL

120 Feet

QRY »,
202 a
i
a mi —_ — oe —— — — ~~ = L _ a
GEOLOGIC MAPS AND SECTIONS OF THE 400- AND 500-FOOT LEVELS, DUCHESS CLAIM, HORSESHOE BAY, LATOUCHE ISLAND, ALASKA

40 o

== 374649 © - 56 (In pocket)