alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0772 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2007 - SW - 053 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### 51.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for the use of Government supply sources (see 51.102(c)) by contractors. In this subpart, the terms *contractors* and *contracts* include *subcontractors* and *subcontracts.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,516
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              17
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,180
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     26,487
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          40,293
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            40,535
<LOANS>                                        137,512
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,910
<DEPOSITS>                                     189,007
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,191
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,400
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 220,910
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,330
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,953
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   184
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,467
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,785
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,785
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,682
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  65
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,895
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,045
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.97
<LOANS-NON>                                        113
<LOANS-PAST>                                       259
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    649
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,707
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      123
<RECOVERIES>                                        39
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,803
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

=
s| §
Locs. 310a and 3250 Sec. 36, T.5N.,R.89W. 2| Sle
Secs. 26 and 34 Sec, 12,” T.4N.,R.89 W. €) €] 3
TSN.,R.89W, Ft =| els
Ft Ft in Cal ©
JEFFWAY GULCH °
Locs, 3870, 387, ond 4030 hole 3I00
TSN.,R.SOW.
o Ft i
in
Ni rou
s ccs. 275a and 390.
hole 387b “Sec, TSN. ROW,
Sec.13, TSN.,ROOW. 100-4
ft
0 Ft in
“Top of
hole 2750
200 ~
Top of hole 387a .
© BERRY GULCH °
Locs, 312a, 312 b, and 313a Ww
300-f 3 Secs.'21, 28,and 29
3 19 candb TSN,R.8SW.
2 i a
3 Il cand Ft in &
Top of °° ©
aye 300 hole 312b 70 =
‘Total depth hole 387b- H =
1p (zm
400 :
: a, 6 5 =
3—Scandb
500.
a
$
500-4 8
: ° a
a) 3
o7 maz 3 3candb 200 8
b fo g 2
TS Top of hole ° 3
oO 81/2 oO 4 Be G =
‘O— 9. zone =
soo}
©
700—-+ Total depth no)
|__ 2c mdb 600-4 pa ~
v | 0 condb °
: 2 = ha >
=y | 6 candb i
7o0-f (includes 8in bone Totol depth hole 2780 ‘zone °
6 o
10 ¢ and b 400 g _
=
So
700-4. oe
Total depth oF
hole 387a )
se
fag
—— 9005 a
800~
900-4
Top of hole a
3124 1000 Top of hole
50
900
Top of hole 4030 [a=] cand
1 8
~
BN Top of hole
3 8 3130 4
_ 1100
i &
2 8 o
? u oO
woof =
04
i) we
o 4
ou Rice mine bed
1200- ut
S
$s
3
o
9 9b 300-7; =
2 Oc 8
o—2 — — 200 _ 8
5 0 3
=
&
Ss
gun mine bed
77
1300

CHART SHOWING CORRELATION OF COAL GROUPS IN THE MESAVERDE GROUP AND KEY BEDS IN THE MESAVERDE
GROUP AND UPPER PART OF THE MANCOS SHALE IN PARTS OF ROUTT AND MOFFAT COUNTIES, COLORADO

OUNSTAN GULCH

HAYDEN GULCH

BULLETIN 1027 PLATE 21

EXPLANATION

Alluvium

Conglomerate

aes

Coal
c, indicates layers of coal too thin
to show by symbol

Bone
b, indicates layers of bone toothin
to show by symbol

Sandy shale
le
(coaera

Sandstone

Limy shale

Limestone
Vv Vv
Mi

v
yy yYyiy

Burned rock

Concealed

Correlationline
Dashed where probable,
queried where interred

Vertical scale
in feet

ro

100

+ 200

300

345016 O - 55 ( In pocket )
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LAWSON, Appellant, v. LAWSON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of William M. Lawson, against Lena L. Lawson.

No opinion. Motion granted, and order modified. Settle order on notice.
Order filed, February 03, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01086-CR

____________

DERRICK BROOKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1326207

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 30, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On January 06, 2014, Tammy Adams filed a motion for extension 

of time to file the record which was granted until January 29, 2014. The court has 

not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been 

filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.
We order Tammy Adams, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
# C_2017023EN.01000301.xml

| 24.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 23/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Slovakia

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 550th anniversary of the University Istropolitana

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows the figure of a teacher and two students positioned before the facade of the building of the former Universitas Istropolitana in Bratislava. In the upper left of the design is a medallion of King Matthias Corvinus, the founder of the university. Above the medallion is the inscription ‘1467’, the year in which the university was opened. The country of issuance ‘SLOVENSKO’ appears at the base of the inner circle, above the year of issuance ‘2017’. Along the left edge of the inner circle is the inscription ‘UNIVERZITA’, and along the right edge ‘ISTROPOLITANA’. In the lower left of the design is the mint mark of the Kremnica Mint (Mincovňa Kremnica), consisting of the initials ‘MK’ placed between two dies. Below the mint mark are the stylised letters ‘MP’, the initials of the designer, Mária Poldaufová.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : January 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
| 1.   | The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              | /s/ Denis A. Krusos       |   |
|-------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|              | Denis A. Krusos           |
|              | Chairman of the Board and |
| February 14, 2011 | Chief Executive Officer   |
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 101

To require executive agencies to reinstate telework policies that were 
         in place on December 31, 2019, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require executive agencies to reinstate telework policies that were 
         in place on December 31, 2019, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Return to Work Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATE PRIOR REMOTE WORK POLICIES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the head of each executive agency shall 
reinstate the telework policies in use by such executive agency on 
December 31, 2019.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Beginning on the date on which the head 
of an executive agency reinstates the telework policies in use by such 
executive agency on December 31, 2019, the reinstated telework policy 
of such executive agency shall apply in place of any telework provision 
of a teleworking, collective bargaining, or other employment agreement 
of such executive agency to the extent that such telework provision 
conflicts with, or applies a different telework policy than, the 
reinstated telework policy of such executive agency.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Executive agency.--The term ``executive agency'' has 
        the meaning given such term in section 105 of title 5, United 
        States Code.
            (2) Reinstated telework policy.--The term ``reinstated 
        telework policy'' means the telework policies in use by an 
        executive agency on December 31, 2019.
            (3) Telework.--The term ``telework'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 6501 of title 5, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Racial Equity Reflection Videos      

# Resource: Racial Equity Reflection Videos

These videos encourage child welfare teams to reflect on the connections between racial equity and child welfare practice, engage in discussions, and use Center resources to take action. Each video is paired with a related discussion guide. **Learn more.**
316.505 Ordering. ( b ) ( 8 ) The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Competition Advocate is the task-order and delivery-order ombudsman for the department. Ombudsmen for each of the HHS contracting activities shall be designated in writing by the head of the contracting activity. See part 306.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Probation Reform: A Toolkit for State Advisory Groups (SAGs)      

# Resource: Probation Reform: A Toolkit for State Advisory Groups (SAGs)

This toolkit (PDF, 26 pages) aims to help State Advisory Groups (SAGs) better understand the benefits of diversion programs as alternatives to probation for system-involved youth. It includes recommendations for implementing probation reform and offers examples of SAGs engaging in diversion strategies. **Learn more.**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(C)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 26, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7814

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEITH E. BRYANT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR95-202-CCB, CA-01-1161-CCB)

Submitted: April 30, 2003 Decided: May 19, 2003

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith E. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying his motion

for a new trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a motion under § 2255 unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not

issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent

“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude Bryant has not made the requisite showing. See

Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003).

Accordingly, we deny Bryant’s motion for appointment of counsel and

an investigator, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED