alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           What Have You Done for Me Lately? How the Affordable Care Act Improves Expectant and Parenting Youth’s Access to Health Care      

# What Have You Done for Me Lately? How the Affordable Care Act Improves Expectant and Parenting Youth’s Access to Health Care

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Adolescent Health (OAH), and Healthy Teen Network

This webinar describes what Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions are pertinent to expectant and parenting youth and their children, as well as what health care resources and services are available for this population. The webinar audio (MP3 file) and transcript (PDF, 43 pages) are also available.

Federal programs

Health care

Pregnant and parenting youth

Service providers

Webinar

http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/snippets/508%20documents/paf_aca_webinar_slides.pdf
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 98

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
 Relations Board relating to ``Standard for Determining Joint Employer 
                               Status''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2023

Mr. James (for himself, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. Banks, 
 Mr. Bean of Florida, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Cole, Mr. Comer, Mr. 
Crawford, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Gooden 
of Texas, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mrs. Hinson, Mrs. 
  Houchin, Mr. LaTurner, Ms. Letlow, Mrs. McClain, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. 
  Mooney, Mr. Pence, Mr. Rose, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mrs. Steel, Mr. 
 Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Walberg, Ms. Stefanik, and Mr. Valadao) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
 Relations Board relating to ``Standard for Determining Joint Employer 
                               Status''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to 
``Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status'' (88 Fed. Reg. 73946 
(October 27, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
### Docket No: F AA-201 0-0683 Directorate ID: l 0-NE-25 

### Disposition Comments
Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3075EN-E 

### Next Step: DFRAN DSNPRM D These comments are in response to an SNPRM

[gJ 

### No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received- 

## If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### l-Ias the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previouslypublished NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focalpoint for guidance. 

### Latc:--t Rc\ i.:-:i('l1. Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9. 

### ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

### Ch ...**w:-~ ~.•r,c.**  

## If

other, explain: Commenter(s): 

### Click her..: 1,1 cnkr t..:·..t. What change to the AD action is requested? Ui..:k here 1\.1**~111-..:r 1~.'\l.**  Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? 

### C!i..:h. here !<..1 cnt;.:r te.'\t. Do we agree? Yc:-> \: ... 1 If 

### YES, we agree because**ln~ert ju~ti**  li..:ati ...)n Make the following changes to the AD: l.i"'!**~11:\ ..:km:;~..·:..:.**  h1 

### th..: .\D If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with 

### !n'i ...'rt t..:xt because ln..;..:rt ju.**..;riti..:~lj·,•n** We disagree with**11~>-.?rt** k'\t because ln-:cn .iu--ti 

### t:..:.:tidn Make the following changes to the AD: 1. 

### i '-l**~m:.** 

### ..:kmo;c-: l\' 

### tb._·. \D



### ISSUE 2: Select one of thefollowing: (**·!~'** ·,, ': \**·;~~..·.** 

## If

other, explain: 

### CL: .. 1>2!\.: !·.' ._'i:· .::· i
.**.:·~J.**
What change to the AD action is requested?', 

### i:**~** 

### ·,**l~·.:;·.:·** :- Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 1. Do we**agree?";·.-~** '. 

### Page 1 of3

### If 

### YES, we agree because I· ..**,·..::·t.i•.:,~l!"i:.~~=··** :1 

### Make the following changes to the AD: l.i.'t ,!!l"..**-:hcl;)~<..':O.[<J[IJ.,;** .\)) 

### If 

### PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with**lt~<rlt..:>.t** 

### because**Ll-:.::;._k~rific,!li.** 

### ·n We disagree with**In.~~·r;** t..::'\1 

### because Jn...,..:n 

## .i u:-.ti**fi..:~tt~.,:J** 

### Make the fo1lowing changes to the AD: l.i:;t**~1~1:,** 

### ..:lun;;;..:..; ll' 

### th .... • .\D If NO, 

### we don't agree because ln..:...:rt**''~tr r~:ti.'IUL'** 


### For additional issues,**double~click** 

### here



### Page 2 of3

### Signature Section Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3075EN-E

# ~t~ ASE Printed Name: Christopher McGuire 

### Date**~** 

## r::r r 

### c, /' ( /[ ( "B,-ra:-n,-c 7 h-;M-:;a,-n""'a"'"ge:-r---------- 

### Date



### Page 3 of3
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-13303, No. 33-71706, No. 33-54961, No. 33-56685, No.
33-56677, No. 33-32699, 33-56683, 33-62057 and No. 33-64073), and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 33-65402, No. 33-69926, No. 33-
56681, No. 33-53833 and No. 33-62059) of Sterling Software, Inc., and in the
related Prospectuses of our report dated November 20, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sterling Software, Inc.
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
1996.




                                         Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas
November 20, 1996
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #9 LTD. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean P. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ SEAN P. MCGRATH                            |
| Sean P. McGrath                                |
| Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |
| September 11, 2015                             |
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TURBO RESTAURANTS, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

REID’S REFRIGERATION INC. d/b/a 

REID’S A/C & HEAT,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00071-CV

Appeal from the

281st Judicial District Court

of Harris County, Texas

(TC# 2020-55564)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause to the trial 

court for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s opinion. We further order that 

Appellant recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This 

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jerry Kieliszak, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chyron Corporation (the "registrant") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "report");



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: August 7, 2003







|/s/ Jerry Kieliszak      
|-------------------------
|Jerry Kieliszak          
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer
#### 619.402-70 DOS designee.

Where the FAR requires action by a Small Business Administration procurement center representative, but one has not been assigned to the DOS contracting activity, the OSDBU Operations Director shall perform the action so required.

[53 FR 26170, July 11, 1988, as amended at 80 FR 6920, Feb. 9, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10054 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10054

   To amend title 13, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Commerce to conduct a mid-decade census of population for the Northern 
Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 25, 2024

 Mr. Sablan (for himself and Mrs. Radewagen) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 13, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Commerce to conduct a mid-decade census of population for the Northern 
Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Insular Area Mid-decade Census 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CENSUS FOR THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, GUAM, AMERICAN SAMOA, 
              AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by adding after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g) The Secretary shall, in 2035 and every 10 years thereafter, 
take a mid-decade census of population as of the first day of April of 
the applicable year for each of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, 
American Samoa, and the United States Virgin Islands.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### 452.237-71 Pre-Bid/Pre-Proposal Conference.

As prescribed in 437.110(b), insert a provision substantially as follows:

# Pre-Bid/Pre-Proposal Conference (FEB 1988)

(a) The Government is planning a pre-bid/pre-proposal conference, during which potential offerors may obtain a better understanding of the work required.

(b) Offerors are encouraged to submit all questions in writing at least five (5) days prior to the conference. Questions will be considered at any time prior to or during the conference; however, offerors will be asked to confirm verbal questions in writing. Subsequent to the conference, an amendment to the solicitation containing an abstract of the questions and answers, and a list of attendees, will be disseminated.

(c) In order to facilitate conference preparations, it is requested that the person named on the Standard Form 33 of this solicitation be contacted and advised of the number of persons who will attend.

(d) The Government assumes no responsibility for any expense incurred by an offeror prior to contract award.

(e) Offerors are cautioned that, notwithstanding any remarks or clarifications given at the conference, all terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless they are changed by amendment to the solicitation. If the answers to conference questions, or any solicitation amendment, create ambiguities, it is the responsibility of the offeror to seek clarification prior to submitting an offer.

(f) The conference will be held:

Date:

Time:

Location:

(End of clause)
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 25, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

President (Principal Executive Officer)
570.203-4 Negotiation, evaluation, and award. ( a ) If the contracting officer needs to conduct negotiations, use the procedures in 570.307.
( b ) Evaluate offers in accordance with the solicitation. Evaluate prices and document the lease file to demonstrate whether the proposed contract prices are fair and reasonable. See 570.110.
( c ) If the total price, including options, exceeds the amount established by FAR 15.403-4, consider whether the contracting officer needs cost and pricing data to determine that the price is fair and reasonable. In most cases, the exceptions at FAR 15.403-1 will apply.
( d ) Regardless of the process used, the contracting officer must determine whether the price is fair and reasonable.
( e ) If the total contract value of the lease, including options, will exceed the amount established by FAR 19.702(a), the proposed awardee must provide an acceptable small business subcontracting plan. This requirement does not apply if the proposed awardee is a small business concern.
( f ) Make award to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government considering price and other factors included in the solicitation.
[76 FR 30850, May 27, 2011]
#### 52.225-15-52.225-16 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Ralph K. Arpaio and Gregory J. Wilkin, Respondents. The People of the State of *929New York, Appellant, v Ralph K. Arpaio and Dennis P. Morrissey, Respondents.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated September 13, 1978, which granted the defendants’ motion to suppress certain statements. Order affirmed. In November, 1977, Sullivan’s Bar in Pine Bush was burglarized, and approximately $270 was stolen. Police Investigator Solomon interviewed a bar employee who stated that defendants Morrissey and Arpaio were present in the bar at closing time on the night prior to the night on which the burglary took place. Another police investigator named Pasquale learned from a confidential informant that Morrissey and Arpaio were responsible for the burglary and that $240 had been stolen. The informant stated that Morrissey had admitted to him his role in the burglary. The tip was conveyed to Solomon, and Morrissey was arrested without a warrant. Morrissey admitted that he and Arpaio had committed the Sullivan’s Bar burglary. Arpaio, who was subsequently arrested, confessed to the Sullivan’s Bar burglary. He stated further that he and defendant Wilkins were responsible for the robbery of a "7-11” store earlier that year. Wilkins also made a statement to the police at the time of his arrest. In our opinion, Morrissey was arrested without probable cause. No evidence was offered which would indicate that the confidential informant, who did not appear before the Trial Judge, was reliable (see *Aguilar v Texas,*378 US 108). Certainly, the information obtained by Investigator Solomon was insufficient to "permit the suspicions engendered by the informant’s report to ripen into a judgment that a crime” had probably been committed *(Spinelli v United States,*393 US 410, 418; cf. *People*v *Alaimo,*34 NY2d 187; *People v Hitt,*61 AD2d 857). The statements were properly suppressed as fruits of the tainted arrest (see *Brown v Illinois,*422 US 590). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Mangano, JJ., concur.