alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2 limits for sulfur dioxide.

EFED Response: EFED recognizes that the Fruit Doctor is only registered in CA, and that CA

has strict air release limits. This neither precludes or exempts EFED from assessing ecological risks under this application.

Reason 3: Most facilities using sulfur dioxide use wet sc rubbing method of removing sulfur dioxid, not direct venting (see August 7, 2013).

EFED Response: In the FOCUS meeting, the registrant was unable to prove that all sources contained scrubbing and complete removal of emissions. Since not all the labels re quire scrubbing and the use of venting to remove sulfur dioxide exists , EFED has assumed that emissions do occur in some, albeit few, facilities. For example, the label 67799

- 3 states that “end fumigation prior to the end of 30 minutes, or sooner, by vent ing or scrubbing the fumigated air from the enclosed area”,

Reason 4: Nearly all sulfur dioxide use is directed into temperature controlled , well

- sealed units. Indeed, many facilities obtain certification that demonstrates their units are “leak proof”.

EFED Response: While many facilities obtain certification to demonstrate they are “leak proof”, in the absence of proof that all facilities are well sealed and where the gas would not be released to at the end of fumigation, EFED assumes that there are facilities that are not well sealed. EFED assumes the potential for risk for all facilities that are not well

- sealed.

Reason 5: The RED required that the concentration of sulfur dioxide released not exceed 30

ppm.

EFED Response: EFED calculated exposure based on application rates specified on the labels

and release scenarios for this application.

Reason 6: There have been no reported incidents associated with the use of sulfur dioxide (see page 18 of Problem Formulation).

EFED Response: Lac k of previously reported incidents does not necessarily indicate that incidents have not occurred, nor that incidents are not possible.

Snowden Comment 2: Snowden does not believe that the mechan ical and passive aeration scenarios using information from Methyl Bromide accurately reflect the use of Sulfur Dioxide particularly given the different use patterns of most Methyl Bromide applications and those for

Sulfur Dioxide.

EFED Response: In consultation with HED, EFED assumes that releases of fumigants f rom fumigation chambers would be the same across all fumigants. Therefore, our basis of modeling calculations from the HED methyl bromide assessment would apply to sulfur dioxide.
#### WEIS v. ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 2, 1906.)

Carriers—Connecting Carriers—Special Contracts.

The mere statement of the clerk of a railroad company receiving goods to the effect that they would be sent to the place of destination is no evidence of a special contract to transport the goods beyond the company’s own lines.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 9, Cent. Dig. Carriers, § 781.] Giegerich, J., dissenting.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Israel Weis against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before. SCOTT, P. J., and GIEGERICH and GREEN-BAUM, JJ.

Leon Dashew, for appellant.

Roberts Walker,-for respondent.

SCOTT, P. J.

There was not the slightest evidence of a through contract. The mere statement of the clerk who received them, to the *994effect that they would be sent to New York, is no evidence of a special contract.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

GREENBAUM, J., concurs.

GIEGERICH, J.

(dissenting). On the respondent’s .own theory of the law, the judgment should be reversed. The witness Zimlinslcy testified that the agent who received the goods said to the plaintiff that they would be sent to New York. This afforded evidence of a special contract on the defendant’s part to transport the goods beyond its own lines and to the place of destination.

The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0472; Dir ID 2011-NM-005-AD
#### Agnes T. Howe, defendant in error, v. Harriet M. Miller, administratrix of the estate of Minnie May Roy, deceased, plaintiff in error.

Gen No. 29,951.

Action upon claim against estate of decedent. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

Robert P. Burkhalter, for plaintiff in error.

Clyde C. Fisher, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
FY 2011 GRANTEES

TITLE III PART A STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM

PR NUMBER GRANTEE STATE FY 2011 AWARD

1 P031A110193 Central Alabama Community College AL $ 400,000

2 P031A110203 Pima County Community College AZ $ 399,226

3 P031A110200 South Mountain Community College AZ $ 397,577

4 P031A110194 Mesa Community College AZ $ 400,000

5 P031A110197 Lassen Community College CA $ 400,000

6 P031A110212 Lewis and Clarke Community College IL $ 399,232

7 P031A110176 Ivy Tech Community College IN $ 399,848

8 P031A110204 Union College KY $ 399,818

9 P031A110186 Our Lady of the Lake College LA $ 396,029

10 P031A110208 Becker College MA $ 399,496

11 P031A110175 Community College of Baltimore County MD $ 386,708

12 P031A110180 Kennebec Valley Community College ME $ 322,812

13 P031A110202 Grand Rapids Community College MI $ 398,968

14 P031A110198 Three Rivers Community College MO $ 399,700

15 P031A110189 Rowan-Cabarrus Community College NC $ 399,950

16 P031A110199 Western Piedmont Community College NC $ 349,010

17 P031A110207 Bismarck State College ND $ 399,131

18 P031A110179 Daemen College NY $ 399,534

19 P031A110211 Jefferson Community College NY $ 398,000

20 P031A110209 Jamestown Community College NY $ 399,734

21 P031A110217 Northeastern State University OK $ 383,321

22 P031A110187 Oklahoma State University OK $ 399,969

23 P031A110174 Southern Nazarene University OK $ 399,970

24 P031A110196 Northwestern Oklahoma State University OK $ 300,162

25 P031A110178 Immaculata University PA $ 399,833

26 P031A110206 Cedar Crest College PA $ 400,000

27 P031A110184 Pennsylvania Highlands Community College PA $ 379,952

28 P031A110213 Piedmont Technical College SC $ 399,686

29 P031A110185 Cleveland State Community College TN $ 400,000

30 P031A110205 Clark College WA $ 371,687

31 P031A110192 Bellingham Technical College WA $ 160,368

32 P031A110191 Chippewa Valley Technical College WI $ 397,003

33 P031A110214 Western Technical College WI $ 396,199

34 P031A110177 West Virginia Northern Community College WV $ 332,158

Total $ 12,965,081

[as of 10/13/2011]
May 29, 2015 Kevin Schlemmer Chief, EssentialAir Service 

### &DomesticAnalysis Division UnitedStatesDepartment ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 

### Re: Petition ofMason City, IAfor a Waiver from the 10-Enplanement Status DocketDOT-OST-2001-10684
Dear

### Mr. Schlemmer:**:~** .! •

On behalf of the Mason City Airport Commission, City of Mason City, Iowa, I am submitting this petition for a waiver exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41731(a)(1)(B)in terminating our EAS eligibility based upon the 10 passenger per day statute. This request is based upon airport enplanement history and the fact that Great Lakes Airlines suspended all air service on February 1, 2014. Great Lakes entered our market in 2012 and during that time ridership declined drastically due to reliability issues, numerous cancellations as well as the pilot shortage that hit the airline industry in 2013. I have attached a history of enplanement/deplanements which demonstrates our airport1s to far exceed the 10-enplanement rule in prior years of commercial service atour Air.Choice One commenced service at Mason City on November 17, 2014 and from the beginning the community and the entire North Iowa Region has supported the new carrier. The airport's enplanement/deplanement numbers have doubled and in some cases tripledfrom theprevious carrier. Quality Air Service is essential to our region and the rural communities within it. Our region can retain and expand existing entities as well as improve our abilityto attract future economic development in the area. We appreciate the opportunity to receive a waiver exemption based upon our history and the special circumstances that negatively impacted our airport in 2013 and 2014.

Tom L. Hovland Chair, Mason CityAirport Commission
#### 622.604 Exemptions
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>     0000018886
<NAME>     Century Laboratories Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                       2,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   100,000
<OTHER-SE>                              (7,537,715)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,395
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           197,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            10,002
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (187,402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (187,402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)



</TABLE>
H. R. 10065 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 802 North 

Tancahua Street in Corpus Christi, Texas, as the ‘‘Captain Robert E. ‘Bob’ 

Batterson Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN ROBERT E. ‘‘BOB’’ BATTERSON POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 802 North Tancahua Street in Corpus Christi, 

Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain Robert 

E. ‘Bob’ Batterson Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Captain Robert E. ‘Bob’ Batterson Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Lina Becker, Deceased. Irving F. Schroeder, as Executor of Lina Becker, Deceased, Appellant; Emery Schroeder et al., Respondents.

Decree and order unanimously reversed on the law and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court of Erie County for further proceedings in accordance with the Memorandum, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: There is no evidence on the issue of undue influence sufficient to present a question of fact for the jury. The proponent’s motion for a directed verdict on this issue should have been granted. *(Matter of Walther*6 N Y 2d 49.) The will should be admitted to probate. (Appeal by petitioner, Irving F. Schroeder, from a decree of Erie Surrogate’s Court denying probate of the last will and testament of Lina Becker, deceased; also appeal from an order of Erie Trial Term denying petitioner’s motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial.) Present — Wilil-ams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.
Amended Schedule 2.1 of Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust Agt



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Schedule 2.1 to the 
 Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust Agreement 
 Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements Subject to Trust 
 (1) Sunoco, Inc. Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”); 
 (2) Sunoco, Inc. Deferred Compensation
Plan; 
 (3) Sunoco, Inc. Pension Restoration Plan; 
 (4) Sunoco, Inc. Savings Restoration Plan. 
 (5) Sunoco, Inc. Special Executive Severance Plan;

 (6) The funding of the Sunoco, Inc. Special Employee Severance Plan necessary to provide benefits in accordance with the terms of such
Plan to only those employees then in grades 11 through 13. 
 (7) The entire funding for all the Indemnification Agreements with the
executives set forth below shall be Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) in the aggregate: 
  

			
	 (a)   Michael J. Colavita
	  	(n)   Joel H. Maness 2
	 (b)   Terence P. Delaney 9
	  	(o)   Michael J. McGoldrick
	 (c)   Michael H. R. Dingus 1
	  	(p)   Christopher J. Minnich
	 (d)   John G. Drosdick 3
	  	(q)   Ann C. Mulé
	 (e)   Lynn L. Elsenhans
	  	(r)    Paul A. Mulholland 6
	 (f)     Bruce G. Fischer
	  	(s)   Rolf D. Naku 7
	 (g)   Peter J. Gvazdauskas
	  	(t)    Marie A. Natoli
	 (h)   Michael J. Hennigan 8
	  	(u)   Robert W. Owens
	 (i)     Thomas W. Hofmann 5
	  	(v)   Bruce D. Rubin
	 (j)    Vincent J. Kelley
	  	(w)   Thomas J. Scargle
	 (k)   Joseph P. Krott
	  	(x)   Michael J. Thomson
	 (l)    Michael S. Kuritzkes
	  	(y)   Charles K. Valutas 4
	 (m)  Brian P. MacDonald
	  	(z)   Dennis Zeleny

 NOTES: 

	 	1.	Mr. Dingus retired as a Senior Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective June 1, 2008. 


	 	2.	Mr. Maness stepped down as an Executive Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective July 9, 2007. He continued on a part-time basis as Strategic Advisor on refining and
supply issues reporting directly to the Company’s President, until his retirement from the Company, effective January 1, 2008. 


	 	3.	Mr. Drosdick retired as Chief Executive Officer and President of Sunoco, Inc., effective August 8, 2008. 


	 	4.	Mr. Valutas retired as a Senior Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective September 1, 2008. 


	 	5.	Mr. Hofmann retired as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective December 1, 2008. 


	 	6.	Mr. Mulholland retired as Treasurer of Sunoco, Inc., effective December 1, 2008. 


	 	7.	Mr. Naku retired as a Senior Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective December 1, 2008. 


	 	8.	Mr. Hennigan stepped down as a Senior Vice President of Sunoco, Inc., effective May 15, 2009, at which time he accepted an executive officer position with a Sunoco,
Inc. subsidiary. 


	 	9.	Mr. Delaney ceased being Interim Chief Financial Officer of Sunoco, Inc., effective August 31, 2009.
#### 406.302 Circumstances permitting other than full and open competition.
Exhibit 10.2


 





 


May 8, 2017







Chris Koverman


San Jose, CA







Dear Chris,







Chris, you are a valued member of the Support.com (the “Company”) team.  This is all the more true as we face important transitions at our company. Consequently, we at the Company want to recognize and reward the continued support and additional contributions that will be asked of you during this period of change, and thank you in advance for helping make this a smooth and successful transition.







This letter confirms that you are eligible to earn a one-time, lump sum bonus in the amount of $50,000.00 (fifty thousand dollars) (the “Bonus”), less applicable withholdings.  You will earn the Bonus if you continue to perform your duties in a fully satisfactory manner (as determined by the Company in its good faith discretion) through October 31, 2017, and you remain an employee of the Company (or another entity elected by the Company) in good standing through that date.  If earned, the Bonus will be paid to you on the first regularly scheduled pay date following October 31, 2017 (the “Payment Date”).







You will not earn the Bonus (or any prorated portion of the Bonus) if your employment is terminated by the Company prior to the Payment Date for “Cause” (as defined below), or if you resign from your employment with the Company (or another entity elected by the Company) for any reason prior to the Payment Date.  If you are terminated by the Company without Cause prior to the Payment Date, you will receive the Bonus, less applicable withholdings.







“Cause” means a termination of your employment for any of the following reasons: (i) theft, dishonesty, misconduct, or falsification of any employment or Company records; (ii) improper disclosure of the Company’s confidential or proprietary information; (iii) any action by you that has a material detrimental effect on the Company’s reputation or business; (iv) your failure or inability to perform any assigned duties after written notice from the Company of, and a reasonable opportunity to cure, such failure or inability; (v) your conviction (including any plea of guilty or no contest) for any criminal act that impairs your ability to perform your duties for the Company; (vi) a material breach of any agreement between you and the Company; or (vii) your material violation of any Company policy.







The Bonus offer contained in this letter cannot be revoked or modified except with your prior written consent.







Again, thank you for the outstanding work you do and your continued engagement and support during this important time.


 


Sincerely,







Rick Bloom


Interim President and Chief Executive Officer


Support.com, Inc.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER016021      

# PPRER016021

Advanced Empirical Solutions. Impact of a Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program in Los Angeles County School Districts, Evaluation of Will Power/Won't Power in Los Angeles County, 2015.

LowRandom assignment study that received a low rating because it had high attrition and did not establish baseline equivalence for the final analysis sample
#### John N. Armstrong et al. v. John C. Doyle et al.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted on condition that appellants Milton Berman and Larry Silberberg file a notice of argument for the June 1962 Term of this court on or before May 10, 1962. The appeal taken by appellants Sydelle Glass and Sophie Cruso is severed unless they serve and file their appellants’ points on or before May 10, 1962. Respondents’ points are to be served and filed on or before May 25, 1962. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results
of operations of the Company for the period indicated.
  /s/ William J. CardenWilliam J. CardenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
## Key Staff

**GPA Short-Term  Projects and Advanced Overseas Intensive Language Training Projects**

Cory Neal, Program Officer  E-mail: GPA@ed.gov

## Mailing Address

U.S. Department of  Education, OPE  International and Foreign Language Education  Fulbright-Hays Group Projects Abroad Program  400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.  Washington, DC 20202  Main Telephone: (202) 704-3437Fax: (202) 453-5780

IFLE Home
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Sextortion: Protecting Youth Through the School Emergency Operations Plan      

# Resource: Sextortion: Protecting Youth Through the School Emergency Operations Plan

This fact sheet (PDF, 6 pages) describes sextortion and its impacts on students. The infographic outlines how schools can protect youth from sextortion through the creation and modification of a Sextortion Annex in the school emergency operations plan (EOP). **Learn more**(PDF, 6 pages).