### 70807 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 15, 2011 / Notices

District of Alabama; Case No. 09– 00186–001–WS; March 1953.

(29) George Frank Myles Jr. (aka George Miles); November 10, 2008; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case No. 07–20930–CR– UNGARO; September 1948.

(30) Emenike Charles Nwankwoala; January 6, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Maryland; Case No. PJM–8– 10–CR–00179–001; October 1960.

(31) Andrew V. O’Donnell; August 1, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10–CR– 491–CAP; July 1997.

(32) Joseph O’Toole; December 14, 2010; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case No. 0:10CR60177–COHN–1; May 1931.

(33) Sergio Perez-Contreras; August 2, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:09CR00339–001; March 1938

(34) Julio Cesar Ramirez; June 30, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00288–001; July 1989.

(35) Julio Salazar-Galan; October 22, 2010; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00400–001; July 1990.

(36) Juan Sauceda-Rangel; May 23, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01794–001; May 1981.

(37) Christian Sepulveda-Ortiz; December 17, 2010; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR–10– 02111–001–TUC–CKJ(DTF); June 1983.

(38) Parthasarathy Sudarshan; June 17, 2008; U.S. District Court, District of the District of Columbia; Case No. CR 08–0037; June 1960.

(39) Paul Taylor; March 18, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Delaware; Case No. 09CR121–LPS; August 1966.

(40) Alain Teran; January 13, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00699–001; June

1986.

(41) Eduardo Torres; November 4, 2010; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00330–001; August 1980.

(42) Andrei Antonio Torres-Vasquez; November 15, 2010; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01111–001; December 1985.

(43) Stephanie Monique Townsend; August 24, 2010; U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; Case No. 09CR4271–MMA; January 1989.

(44) Rolando Trevino; June 10, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01793–001; August 1987.

(45) Universal Industries Limited, Inc.; August 22, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case
No. 9:11–80058–CR–MARRA–2. (46) Yufeng Wei (aka Annie Wei); February 4, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts; Case No. 1:08–CR–10386–002–PBS; April 1964.

(47) Zhen Zhou Wu (aka Alex Wu); January 27, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts; Case No. 1:08–CR–10386–001–PBS; March 1964.

As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the date of this notice, the above named persons/ entities remain debarred unless export privileges are reinstated.

Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the ITAR, any person who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate, directly or indirectly, in any export in which such ineligible person may benefit there from or have a direct or indirect interest therein.

Further, Federal Register document 93–26888, published at 58 FR 58586, Tuesday, November 2, 1993, is corrected on page 58586, line 50 through line 57 to read as follows:

1. Tsutomu Iida, 333 8th Maloka-Cho Totsuka-Ku, Kokohama, Japan, 18 U.S.C. 371 (conspiracy to violate 22 U.S.C. 2778), December 17, 1992, United States v. Japan Aviation Electronics Industry, Ltd., et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia,
Criminal Docket No. 91–516–10.

That notice of statutory debarment incorrectly identified the debarred party as ‘‘Tsotomu Ida.’’

This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number where provided.

Dated: November 8, 2011. Andrew J. Shapiro,Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011–29470 Filed 11–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–25–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Monthly notice of PFC approvals and disapprovals. In October 2011, there were six applications approved. This notice also includes information on one application, approved in September 2011, inadvertently left off the September 2011 notice. Additionally, 14 approved amendments to previously approved applications are listed.

**SUMMARY :**  The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158). This notice is published pursuant to paragraph d of § 158.29.
PFC Applications Approved

Public Agency: City of Orlando, Florida.

Application Number: 11–14–C–00– MCO.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.

PFC Level: $3.00. Total PFC Revenue Approved In This
Decision: $26,952,400.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: February 1, 2026.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: June 1, 2026.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC’s: None.

Brief Description of Projects Approved For Collection and Use:

Emergency electrical system improvements: Landside phase 2 and airside terminal 4 phase 1 (design and construction).

Enplane road structural improvements (design and construction).

Landside signage improvements (design and construction).

Taxiway B–2 extension and taxiway B–1 rehabilitation (design and construction).

Elevator and escalator safety code compliance improvements (design and construction).

Runway 18U36R structural joint rehabilitation.

Closed circuit television improvements (design and construction).

Brief Description of Projects Partially Approved For Collection and Use:


### 70808 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 15, 2011 / Notices

Emergency radio dispatch system upgrade.

Determination: The emergency radio dispatch system is used for both eligible (aircraft rescue and firefighting and aviation security) and ineligible (normal law enforcement activities and medical emergencies) purposes. The PFC approval was limited to the cost associated with the eligible activities.

Airside 4 hub mechanical system improvements (design and construction).

Determination: That portion of the mechanical systems serving concessions and other non-public areas of the terminal was found to be ineligible.

Decision Date: September 28, 2011. For Further Information Contact: Susan Moore, Orlando Airports District Office, (407) 812–6331.

Public Agency: City of Augusta, Georgia.

Application Number: 11–03–C–00– AGS.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in This
Decision: $2,091,034.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: September 1, 2026.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: November 1, 2027.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s: Air taxi operators filing
FAA Form 1800–31.

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that the approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at Augusta Regional Airport.

Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:

Runway 17/35 rehabilitation. General aviation terminal parking lot.

Decision Date: October 6, 2011. For Further Information Contact: Anna Guss, Atlanta Airports district Office, (404) 305–7146.

Public Agency: County of Broome, Johnson City, New York.

Application Number: 11–15–C–00– BGM.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this
Decision: $298,884.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: December 1, 2015.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: September 1, 2016.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s: Nonscheduled/ondemand air carriers filing FAA Form

1800–31. Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that the approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at Greater Binghamton Airport.

Brief Description of Projects Approved For Collection and Use:

Replacement of aircraft rescue and firefighting gear.

Snow removal equipment purchase. PFC administrative costs (2012–2016). Airport master plan phase III. West apron rehabilitation design. West apron rehabilitation
construction. Purchase of portable Americans with

Disabilities Act compliant passenger boarding ramp.
Decision Date: October 17, 2011. For Further Information Contact: Andrew Brooks, New York Airports District Office, (516) 227–3816.

Public Agency: City of Atlanta, Georgia.

Application Number: 11–13–C–00–
ATL.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this
Decision: $171,840,875.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: March
1, 2023.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: April 1, 2024.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s: Air taxi/commercial operators when enplaning revenue passengers in limited, irregular, special service air taxi/commercial operations such as air ambulance services, student instruction, and non-stop sight seeing flights, that begin and end at the airport and are concluded within a 25-mile radius of the airport.

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that the approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of thetotal annual enplanements at HartsfieldJackson Atlanta International Airport.

Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a $4.50 PFC Level:

Supplemental windcones relocation and directional signage.

Common use baggage handling system.

T-north optimization and expansion— phases I and II.

Deicing system upgrades. Airfield pavement replacement 2011–

2016.

Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a $3.00 PFC Level: A380 airfield modifications. A380 terminal modifications. Land acquisition for airport expansion

east.

Airfield lighting vaults emissions reduction modifications.

Airport sustainability plan. Terminal upgrades—concourse D. Airport master plan update.

Decision Date: October 19, 2011. For Further Information Contact: Anna Guss, Atlanta Airports District Office, (404) 305–7146.

Public Agency: City of Billings,
Montana.

Application Number: 12–07–C–00–
BIL.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.

PFC Level: $3.00. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this
Decision: $2,020,000.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: December 1, 2011.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: October 1, 2013.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s: None.

Brief Description of Projects Approved For Collection and Use: Snow removal equipment replacement. Terminal security lobby expansion.

Update airport storm water system plan. Airfield storm water detention

improvements.

Decision Date: October 20, 2011. For Further Information Contact: Dave Stelling, Helena Airports District Office, (406) 449–5257.

Public Agency: Port of Seattle, Seattle, Washington.

Application Number: 11–07–C–00– SEA.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this
Decision: $155,720,118.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: January 1, 2027.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: November 1, 2028.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s: None.

Brief Description of Project Approved For Collection and Use at a $4.50 PFC Level: In-line baggage system.

Decision Date: October 21, 2011. For Further Information Contact: Trang Tran, Seattle Airports District Office, (425) 227–1662.

Public Agency: County of Oneida and City of Rhinelander, Rhinelander,
Wisconsin.

Application Number: 12–12–C–00–
RHI.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.


### 70809 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 15, 2011 / Notices

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this
Decision: $35,135.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: December 1, 2011.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: June 1, 2012.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’s: Nonscheduled/ondemand air carriers filing FAA Form

1800–31. Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that the approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport.

Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use: Update master plan. Electrical vault remodel. Design taxiway A, Al, A3, B and D
reconstruction. Airfield pavement plus incursion

markings. Wind cone lighting upgrade. Rehabilitate taxiways. PFC administration.

Decision Date: October 24, 2011. For Further Information Contact: Daniel Millenacker, Minneapolis Airports District Office, (612) 713–4359.



### AMENDMENTS TO 

### PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No., city, state Amended approved date Original approved net PFC revenue Amended approved net PFC revenue Original estimated charge

exp. date Amended estimated charge

exp. date

05–10–C–09–MCO, Orlando, FL ..................... 09/27/11 $745,803,511 $749,303,511 12/01/19 12/01/19 06–06–C–02–GRK, Killeen, TX ....................... 09/28/11 2,780,476 2,494,772 01/01/10 01/01/10 09–13–C–01–MCO, Orlando, FL ..................... 09/29/11 227,788,000 227,788,000 02/01/26 02/01/26 09–01–C–01–CHS, Charleston, SC ................ 09/29/11 7,933,920 14,833,920 12/01/11 06/01/13 07–02–C–01–NYL, Yuma, AZ ......................... 09/30/11 1,155,674 1,455,674 01/01/13 01/01/14 01–03–C–01–LWS, Lewiston, ID ..................... 10/05/11 1,171,746 1,300,088 07/01/16 02/01/12 08–04–C–01–RST, Rochester, MN ................. 10/07/11 1,555,114 1,319,101 01/01/11 07/01/10 08–14–C–02–MKE, Milwaukee, WI ................. 10/07/11 16,860,334 19,730,334 08/01/20 11/01/20 11–07–C–01–PUW, Pullman, WA ................... 10/11/11 101,950 210,700 03/01/12 11/01/12 00–03–C–03–CSG, Columbus, GA ................. 10/12/11 864,065 876,138 11/01/06 11/01/06 05–02–C–02–ANC, Anchorage, AK ................ 10/14/11 25,000,000 85,000,000 07/01/15 12/01/26 11–07–C–01–LFT, Lafayette, LA ..................... 10/21/11 1,000,000 1,965,000 05/01/14 05/01/15 94–01–C–06–1SP, Ronkonkoma, NY ............. 10/26/11 21,865,831 22,382,626 07/01/04 07/01/04 96–02–C–02–ISP, Ronkonkoma, NY .............. 10/26/11 4,059,528 4,497,958 03/01/05 03/01/05

Issued in Washington, DC on November 3,

2011. Joe Hebert, Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch.

[FR Doc. 2011–29275 Filed 11–14–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–M**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In September 2011, there were four applications approved. This notice also includes information on three applications, approved in August 2011, inadvertently left off the August 2011 notice. Additionally, 11 approved amendments to previously approved applications are listed.

**SUMMARY :**  The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158). This notice is published pursuant to paragraph d of § 158.29.
PFC Applications Approved

Public Agency: Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority, Nashville,
Tennessee.

Application Number: 11–17–C–00–
BNA.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.

PFC Level: $3.00. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this
Decision: $2,500,000.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: January 1, 2017.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: March 1, 2017.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC’s:

Air taxi operators that have less than one percent of passenger boardings, enplane less than 25,000 passengers per year, and/or provide unscheduled service at Nashville International Airport (BNA).

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that the approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at BNA.

Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use: Reconstruct taxiway Kilo. Light emitting diode taxiway lighting

upgrade 2L. Pavement condition index airfield inspection. Brief Description of Withdrawn Projects:

Safety management study. Date of withdrawal: May 20, 2011. Disparity study. Date of withdrawal: August 23, 2011. Decision Date: August 24, 2011. For Further Information Contact: Cynthia Wills, Memphis Airports District Office, (901) 322–8190.

Public Agency: Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority, Reno, Nevada.

Application Number: 11–11–C–00– RNO.

Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this
Decision: $25,491,376.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: October 1, 2013.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: April 1, 2017.

Classes of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC’s:

(1) Nonscheduled/on demand air carriers filing FAA Form 1800–31; (2) commuter or small certificated air carriers filing Department of Transportation (DOT) Form T–100; and (3) foreign air carriers filing DOT Form T–100(f).

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public