alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Pamela J. Keefe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Pamela J. Keefe     
Pamela J. Keefe
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation ("CVPS") and will be retained by CVPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Children's Bureau      

# Children's Bureau

The Children's Bureau (CB) is one of two bureaus within the Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Administration for Children and Families, of the Department of Health and Human Services. The Children's Bureau seeks to improve the safety, permanency and well-being of children through leadership, support for necessary services, and productive partnerships with states, tribes, and communities. It has the primary responsibility for administering federal programs that support state child welfare services.

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/index.htm
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice      

# Resource: Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice

This toolkit describes the types of bullying, estimates of affected youth, and possible consequences. It also provides tailored information for youth, parents, teachers, school administrators, community-based leaders, health care providers, and policymakers on what strategies work, what strategies have been shown not to be effective, and where to find additional resources. **Learn more.**
H. Con. Res. 84 Agreed to March 14, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO 

PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO ‘‘GHOST 

ARMY’’. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor 

Center is authorized to be used on March 21, 2024, for a ceremony 

to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively to the 23d 

Headquarters Special Troops and the 3133d Signal Services Company, known collectively as the ‘‘Ghost Army’’, in recognition of 

unique and highly distinguished service during World War II. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the conduct of 

the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in 

accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol 

may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10181 

To exclude the imposition of duties and import quotas from the authorities 

provided to the President under the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2024 

Ms. DELBENE (for herself, Mr. BEYER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. LARSON of 

Connecticut, Ms. SEWELL, Ms. CHU, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. 

KILDEE, and Mr. HORSFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To exclude the imposition of duties and import quotas from 

the authorities provided to the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Tariff Abuse 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10181 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPOSITION OF IMPORT DU2 TIES AND QUOTAS FROM PRESIDENTIAL AU3 THORITIES UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL 

4 EMERGENCY ECONOMIC POWERS ACT. 

5 Section 203 of the International Emergency Eco6 nomic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub8 section (d); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(c) The authority granted to the President by this 

12 section does not include the authority to impose duties, 

13 tariff-rate quotas, or other quotas on articles entering the 

14 United States.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francisco Padin, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction for manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law, § 1050) after trial unanimously affirmed. The only serious question in the ease, and it is troublesome indeed, is the nexus of proof that the wood alcohol sold by defendant through two intermediate sales was the cause of death of the victims. Considering only the evidence competent against the appealing defendant, it is concluded that there was sufficient to entitle a jury to so conclude. Defendant admitted the sale to Rodriquez. The witness Vega testified that he overheard Rodriquez arrange for the sale and delivery to Diaz. There was no other proof of delivery under the sale. The victims died of wood alcohol sold to them in mixed beverages by Diaz. Wood alcohol was found in Diaz’ premises together with other quantities of grain alcohol. In the absence of proof or circumstance that Diaz purchased wood alcohol from sources other than Rodriquez, although obviously he purchased the grain alcohol from other sources, the jury was entitled to infer that it was defendant’s wood alcohol, passed through Rodriquez, which Diaz sold to the victims. In dealing with a fungible good like wood alcohol, the problem of specific tracing is virtually impossible if the containers have been changed in the process, which was the case here. What is left as a basis for inference are the probabilities of uninterrupted transmission through intermediate handlers. The probabilities to be assessed were for the triers of the facts, once it became evident that at least a threshold probability of uninterrupted transmission was present. There was no evidence of a competing source. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Babin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### 552.238-97 Parts and Service.

As prescribed in 538.273(d)(21), insert the following clause:

# Parts and Service (MAY 2019)

(a) For equipment under items listed in the schedule of items or services on which offers are submitted, the Contractor represents by submission of this offer that parts and services (including the performing of warranty or guarantee service) are now available from dealers or distributors serving the areas of ultimate overseas destination or that such facilities will be established and will be maintained throughout the contract period. If a new servicing facility is to be established, the facility shall be established no later than the beginning of the contract period.

(b) Each Contractor shall be fully responsible for the services to be performed by the named servicing facilities, or by such facilities to be established, and fully guarantees performance of such services if the original service proves unsatisfactory.

(c) Contractors are requested to provide the Ordering Activity, the names and addresses of all supply and service points maintained in the geographic area in which the Contractor will perform. Please indicate opposite each point whether or not a complete stock of repair parts for items offered is carried at that point, and whether or not mechanical service is available.

(End of clause)

[84 FR 17046, Apr. 23, 2019]
#### Eloise Baker, Petitioner, v State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents.

— The determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated May 18, 1978, and the order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 6, 1975, are both unanimously annulled, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the matter remanded to the Division for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. In its order, dated February 6, 1975, the State Division of Human Rights (Division) found that there was no probable cause to believe that the respondent had engaged in any unlawful discriminatory practice. That order followed an investigation and conference. However, the written report summarizing the investigation was only written after the Division had made its finding of no probable cause. Hence, that written report was not considered by the Division nor was it made part of the instant record. Thus, it is unclear, from this record, to what extent the Division relied upon the evidence compiled during the investigation and whether that investigative report supported its finding. The Division should have waited for and considered the investigative report in order to make an informed determination based upon all the relevant evidence available. (Cf. *Papeskov v State Div. of Human Rights,*60 AD2d 545.) The State Human Rights Appeal Board (Appeal Board) should have reversed the Division’s order and remanded the proceeding to the Division for a consideration of the investigative report. Since we cannot intelligently review this record without the incorporation therein of the investigative report *(Matter of Collins v Behan,*285 NY 187), we annul the determination of the Appeal Board, dated May 18, 1978, and the order of the Division, dated February 6, 1975, and remand this matter to the Division for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.
CONSENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of Registrant for the period ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, certify that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.


/s/ Willard G. McAndrew, III
Name: Willard G. McAndrew, III
Title:    CEO and President


/s/ Roger N. Wurtele
Name: Roger N. Wurtele
Title: Chief Financial Officer
As of April 15, 2003



































                                  93
#### UNITED PRESS et al. v. A. S. ABELL CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Attachment—Joint Contract—Liability—Motion to Vacate.

In an action on a joint contract seeking to hold all the contracting parties liable upon their 'joint obligation, the question of whether or not a cause of action against all the defendants was merged in a judgment recovered in another action upon the same contract against one of defendants individually should not be determined on a motion to vacate an attachment.

*427Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action by the United Press and others against the A. S. Abell Company and others. From an order vacating an attachment, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and HATCH, PATTERSON, O’BRIEN, and LAUGHLIN, JJ.

William C. Davis, for appellants.

Henry T. Fay, for respondents.

PATTERSON, J.

The order vacating the attachment issued in this action should be reversed. That order was granted upon the same grounds which induced the court to vacate an attachment in another action between this plaintiff and some of the defendants herein, and which order we have affirmed. However, a very different question arises in this action from that which controlled the decision in the other cause. 84 N. Y. Supp. 425. There, upon a joint contract, the plaintiff elected to enter a judgment against an individual defendant, and we held that the cause of action was merged in the judgment, and that that judgment was a bar to a recovery against the other defendants. But here the action is constituted in an entirely different way, and all the members of an unincorporated association are sought to be held liable upon their joint obligation. It is true that it is upon the same contract, but the questions of law that may arise in the action should not be absolutely determined until after answers are interposed and issues are properly framed, so that the whole scope of the controversy may be before the- court. If the judgment taken in the first action is to be regarded as a bár, it must be set up as a plea in bar. If it is to be regarded as an estoppel in this particular suit, that question will properly arise when that judgment is offered in evidence on the trial. We do not feel called upon to decide it until it properly arises.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the attachment denied, with $10 costs. All concur.
731.205-70 Overseas recruitment incentive. Note:
The term *employee* as used in this section means an employee who is a U.S. citizen or a U.S. resident alien.)
( a ) If a contractor employee serving overseas under a contract does not qualify for the exemption for overseas income provided under section 911 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 911), such employee is eligible to receive an overseas recruitment incentive (ORI), to the extent the ORI: Is authorized by the contractor's normal policy and practice; is deemed necessary by the contractor to recruit and retain qualified employees for overseas services; and does not exceed 10% of the base salary of the employee from date of arrival at overseas post to begin assignment to date of departure from post at the end of assignment. ORI is to be paid as a single payment at the end of the employee tour of duty overseas. The contractor shall take all reasonable and prudent steps to ensure that ORI is not paid to any employee who has received the IRS section 911 exemption.
( b ) In the event that an employee subsequently receives a section 911 exclusion for any part of the base salary upon which this supplement has been paid, such supplement or appropriate portion thereof shall be reimbursed by the contractor to USAID with interest. The interest shall be calculated at the average U.S. Treasury rate in effect for the period that the contractor or his employee had the funds. Neither the contractor's nor the subcontractor's inability to collect refunds from eligible employees shall be used as a basis to excuse subsequent refunds by the contractor to USAID.
[57 FR 5236, Feb. 13, 1992]
the Bank for reasons of professional advancement, education, health or government service, orduring military leave for any period if the Director is elected to serve on the board followingsuch interruption.9. Forfeiture of Compensation by Competition. The Director agrees that all rights tocompensation following age 65 shall be forfeited by him if he engages in competition with the Bank,without the prior written consent of the Bank, within a radius of 50 miles of the main office ofthe Bank for a period of ten years, coinciding with the number of years that the Director shallreceive such compensation.10. Assignment of Rights. None of the rights to compensation under this Agreement are assignableby the director or any beneficiary or designee of the Director and any attempt to anticipate, sell,transfer, assign, pledge, encumber or change Director’s right to receive compensation, shall bevoid.11. Status of Director’s Rights. The rights granted to the Director or any designee orbeneficiary under this Agreement shall be solely those of an unsecured creditor of the Bank.12. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by a written Agreement signed by the parties.13. If the Bank shall acquire an insurance policy or any other asset in connection with theliabilities assumed by it hereunder, it is expressly understood and agreed that neither Directornor any beneficiary of Director shall have any right with respect to, or claim against, such policyor in the title to such other asset. Such policy or asset shall not be deemed to be held under anytrust for the benefit of Director or his beneficiaries or to be held in any way as collateralsecurity for the fulfilling of the obligations of the Bank under this Agreement except as may beexpressly provided by the terms of such policy or other asset. It shall be, and remain, a general,unpledged, restricted asset of the Bank.14. This agreement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State ofPennsylvania.15. Interpretation. Wherever appropriate in this Agreement, words used in the singular shallinclude the plural and the masculine shall include the feminine gender.16. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successor of the Bankand any such successor shall be deemed substituted for the Bank under the terms of this Agreement.As used herein, the term “successor” shall include any person, corporation or other business entitywhich at any time, whether by merger, purchase or otherwise, acquires all or substantially all ofthe stock, assets or business of the Bank.17. If the Bank’s marginal income tax bracket is different from 34% at the time deferred incomepayments are made under this Agreement to the Director or his beneficiary (ies), the payments maybe adjusted by the Board of Directors to reflect that change. The following formula could be usedto calculate the change in benefits: Monthly Income (As Shown) X .66 divided by 1 — Tax Bracket.18. All compensation provided by this Agreement is in addition to that which is provided underthe Director’s Compensation Agreements dated January 1, 1982 and January 1, 1986.