Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER0S22033      

# PPRER0S22033

                  - Citation: Philliber, A. (2021). The IN·clued program: A randomized control trial of an effective sex education program for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning youths. Journal of Adolescent Health, 69 (4), 636–643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.04.002
                  - Program Name: IN·clued
                  - Change the name of program in Details from “INCLUDED” to IN·clued

IN-clued: Inclusive Healthcare — Youth and Providers Empowered

High
This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that would suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the program

### Program Information

### Evaluation Setting

### Study Sample

### Research Design

1401

2

12 months after baseline and the end of the program. The program is a one-time workshop.

### Study Findings

INCLUDED was evaluated using a randomized controlled trial design involving LGBTQ youth recruited through 16 Planned Parenthood affiliates in these states: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin. Groups of participants were randomly assigned to either a treatment group that received a one-time, three-hour workshop or a control group that participated in an activity on a topic unrelated to sexual health or accessing sexual health care. Surveys were administered immediately before the program and 12 months after the end of the program, or nine months after the conclusion of an opt-in, 12-week supplemental text message service. The study found that 12 months after the workshop, youth participating in INCLUDED were significantly less likely to report having had vaginal sex without using a condom in the past three months (effect size: -0.20). The study also found that, 12 months after study enrollment, youth participating in the treatment group reported having significantly less vaginal sex without using a condom in the past three months (effect size: -0.15). The study found that 12 months after study enrollment, there were no statistically significant program impacts on the following outcomes: lifetime vaginal sex, lifetime pregnancies, lifetime frequency of pregnancy, having vaginal sex in the past three months, having vaginal sex without the use of birth control in the past three months, frequency of vaginal sex without the use of birth control in the

NA = Not available. This means the authors did not report the information in the manuscripts associated with the studies we reviewed.

a This information was not available whenever authors did not report information for the treatment and comparison groups separately on outcome means, standard deviations, and/or sample sizes.

b Authors reported that the program effect (impact) estimate is statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test.

c For some outcomes, having less of that outcome is favorable. In those cases, an effect with a negative sign is favorable to the treatment group (that is, the treatment group had a more favorable outcome than the comparison group, on average).

d An effect meets the review standards for credible evidence whenever it is statistically significant with a p-value of less than 0.05 based on a two-tailed test, includes the appropriate adjustment for clustering (if applicable), and it is not based on an endogenous subgroup.