Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-53 

ACTIONS COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

The Merced River Plan/DEIS would address many management concerns or considerations in the same way, 

regardless of the alternative selected. This section groups these common actions to avoid redundancy under 

each alternative. These actions do not constitute an independent alternative, but rather, are an integral part 

of Alternatives 2-6. These common actions are the heart of the Merced River Plan: they address how river 

values would be protected, regardless of how the visitor experience might vary across Alternatives 2-6 and 

how related services and facilities might vary. 

In addition to the actions listed in this section, each alternative would incorporate the boundaries, 

classifications, and Section 7 determination process outlined in Chapters 3 and 4. The mitigation measures 

described in Table 2-2 and the Mitigation Measures described in Appendix C would also be common to 

Alternatives 2-6. 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

The protection and enhancement of river values that would be common to Alternatives 2-6 is described in 

greater detail in Chapter 5, “River Values and Their Management.” That chapter (1) states the management 

standards for each value, (2) analyzes the current condition of each value and the management concerns or 

considerations related to achieving and maintaining the management standards, and (3) identifies the 

actions that would be required to protect and enhance each value. The actions to protect and enhance the 

river’s geologic, hydrologic, and biological values are described in detail in the Ecological Restoration Plan 

included in Appendix E. 

Many of the actions included in the Ecological Restoration Plan would protect or enhance multiple river 

values; for example, removal of road shoulder parking would improve natural water flows into meadows 

and discourage informal foot trails through meadows, protecting and/or enhancing hydrologic, biological, 

cultural, and scenic values. 

Table 8-8 and the maps that follow highlight major actions for protecting and enhancing river values that are 

common to all the action alternatives. 

TABLE 8-8: SUMMARY OF MAJOR ACTIONS FOR PROTECTING AND ENHANCING RIVER VALUES—COMMON TO 

ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Ecological Restoration Actions (Free Flow, Water Quality, Geologic/Hydrologic, and Biological Values) 

Corridorwide 

Ecological 

Restoration Acreage 164 acres total (refer to Appendix E for specific locations) 

Riprap to be 

Removed 5,700 linear feet (refer to Appendix E for specific locations) 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Free Flow / 

Geologic/Hydrologic 

Values 

 Place large wood into river banks and river channel and construct log jams between Clark’s and 

Sentinel bridges to enhance riparian habitat and channel complexity. 

 Remove riverbank riprap. 

 Remove the Happy Isles bridge footings and outdated infrastructure at the Pohono gauging 

station. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-54 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-8: SUMMARY OF MAJOR ACTIONS FOR PROTECTING AND ENHANCING RIVER VALUES—COMMON TO 

ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Ecological Restoration Actions (Free Flow, Water Quality, Geologic/Hydrologic, and Biological Values) 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley (continued) 

Riparian Buffer / 

Floodplain 

 At a minimum, remove existing campsites from within 100 feet of the bed and banks of the river. 

 Establish a riparian buffer to prohibit any new development within 150 feet of the bed and banks 

of the river 

 Move Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area parking north at least 150 feet away from the river. 

 Implement a 50-foot riparian setback from Indian Creek. 

 Direct river access to resilient sandy beaches and sandbars; fence off sensitive riparian areas 

and restore native riparian vegetation. 

Meadow 

Restoration 

 Remove abandoned infrastructure, including tiles, pipes, and abandoned roads, and ecologically 

restore sites. 

 Improve meadow hydrology by removing artificial fill, filling ditches, constructing culverts, and 

removing remnants of abandoned underground utilities to enhance water flows into meadows 

(actions in particular meadows would sometimes vary among alternatives). 

 Remove 6 miles of informal trails to reduce meadow fragmentation; restore disturbed areas to 

natural conditions; eliminate some roadside parking and fence some areas to reduce the 

potential for informal trailing through sensitive meadow habitat. 

 Eliminate some roadside parking and fence some areas to reduce the potential for informal 

trailing through sensitive meadow habitat. 

 Improve the condition of plant communities at specific locations in Yosemite Valley (67 potential 

acres targeted) by restoring the mosaic of meadow, riparian deciduous, black oak, and open 

mixed conifer forest vegetation. Management actions could include revegetation, prescribed fire, 

mechanical removal of conifers, and infrastructure redesign. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

Riparian Buffer / 

Floodplain 

 Ecologically restore Greenemeyer sand pit. 

 Enhance valley oaks in Old El Portal by creating an oak recruitment area of at least 1 acre in the 

vicinity of the current bulk fuel storage area. 

Segment 7: Wawona 

Riparian Buffer / 

Floodplain 

 Ecologically restore portions of the Wawona campground. Relocate or remove all campsites 

currently within 100 feet of the bed and banks of the river. 

Scenic Values 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Iconic Scenic Views 

 Reduce visual intrusions as part of the ecological restoration program. 

 Ensure that new development is protective of scenic values. 

 Implement management treatments, including removal of vegetation, to protect views from 47 

vista points within the river corridor. 

Cultural Values 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Ethnographic and 

Archeological 

Resources 

 Remove informal trails, non-essential roads, and infrastructure that impacts archeological sites. 

 Delineate bike paths, roads, bridle paths, parking, staging, and trails away from sensitive cultural 

and ethnographic resource areas. 

 Remove graffiti, and install fencing around rock art and other sensitive features to discourage 

inappropriate visitor use 

 Develop site management plans for archeological sites with complex uses and impacts such as 

Yosemite Village. 

Recreational Values 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

River-related 

Recreation 

 Improve circulation and access while reducing crowding at key attraction sites 

 Manage boating to improve dispersed recreation along the river in Yosemite Valley. 
Housekeeping Camp Footbridge Stoneman

Bridge

Northside Drive

Curry 

Village

Lower Pines

Campground

North Pines

Campground

Upper Pines

Campground

Clark'sBridge

Tenaya

Bridge

River Corr di or Boundary

Boys

Town

Southside Drive

The Ahwahnee Backpackers

Campground

Stoneman

Bridge

Merced River

Royal Arches

Meadow

Ahwahnee

Meadow

Stoneman

Meadow

Happy Isles

Bridge

Huff

House

Concessioner

Stables

Curry Village Orchard

Parking Area

Wilderness

Parking

YOSEMITE WILDERNESS

Tennis Court

Former Upper and Lower

River Campground Area

0 0.25 Miles

1

2

3

4

5

6

ACTIONS COMMON TO ALLCURRY VILLAGE AND CAMPGROUNDS

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: CURRY VILLAGE AND CAMPGROUNDS1. The Ahwahnee Meadow Restoration: Restore 5.7 acres by removing conifers to reconnect isolated meadow portions to improve  hydrologic connectivity. Remove tennis courts from black oak woodland and ecologically restore area.  Scenic Views: Selectively thin trees that encroach on views toward Yosemite Falls and maintain views from inside the  historic building. Lodging: Retain the existing 123 units. Parking: Redesign existing parking lot; providing for proper drainage. Construct new 50-space parking lot east of the  area. Follow Ahwahnee Historic Structure Report and cultural landscape report recommendations for parking area  configuration and gatehouse restoration. Services and Facilities: Retain bar and food service, dining room, gift shop, and sweet shop. Remove pool.2. Stoneman Meadow and River Reach Between Bridges Meadow Ecological Restoration: Use restoration fencing to protect the meadow’s north end. Remove encroaching  conifers and invasive plants. Interpretation of River Processes: Create an interpretive nature walk through Lower Rivers area that emphasizes  river-related natural processes and stewardship.  Large Wood Management: Leave large wood in river that does not compromise visitor safety or infrastructure.  Incorporate large wood into riverbanks to provide structure for highly eroded riverbanks. Hydrologic Processes: Place eight naturally-looking constructed log jams to address river widening in the channel  between Clark’s and Sentinel Bridges. Restore riverbank erosion through brushlayering and revegetation. Riparian Restoration: Ecologically restore 20 acres of the former Lower Pines Campground, which was closed after the  1997 flood.3. Curry Village  Curry Village Residential Area: Remove temporary housing at Huff House and Boys Town. Replace with new housing  units at Huff House to accommodate 164 employee beds.  Services and Facilities: Retain Curry grocery store, pizza deck and bar, pavilion and cafeteria, Happy Isles Nature Center,  and Curry Village swimming pool. Remove the Happy Isles snack stand, bike and raft stand, and Curry Village ice rink.  Eliminate commercial horseback day rides at Concessioner Stables in Yosemite Valley. Wilderness Parking Area: Formalize parking using best management practices to protect water quality. Remediate soils  in the area, which was once a landfill site for Curry Village. 4. North Pines and Backpackers Campgrounds Backpackers Campground Western Expansion: Construct 16 new camping sites west of Backpackers Campground. Royal Arches Meadow Restoration: Remove conifers, decompact soils, and revegetate area with native species. Remove  infrastructure, such as tiles, pipes, and abandoned road.  River Access: Direct visitors at Lower and North Pines campgrounds to four resilient sandy beaches through signage  and maps.5. Clark’s Bridge Area  Clark’s Bridge: Place large wood to lessen scouring from the bridge, along with a constructed log jam. Upper Pines RV Dump Station: Relocate RV dump station and utilities away from the river to mitigate potential threat to  water quality. Riverbank Restoration: Direct visitors to resilient river access point. Stabilize eroded riverbanks.6. Happy Isles Area Happy Isles Wayfinding: Improve wayfinding from the shuttle stop to Happy Isles and the Mist Trail. Happy Isles Road Bridge: Place large wood to lessen scouring from the bridge along with brush layering and a  constructed log jam. Remove former footbridge abutments. Pack Stock Trail: Remove 3,800 feet of pack stock trail near the riverbank. Remove asphalt and decompact hardened  surfaces. Re-vegetate with native plants.Cultural Resource Protection Delineate trails; remove informal trails; and remove graffiti to protect culturally sensitive resources. Also, direct visitor  use for additional protection.

COMMON TO ALL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
River Corridor Boundary

Merced River

Nor ht s di e Dr vi e

Ahwahnee Road

Southside Drive

Yosemite Creek

Bridge Cook's Meadow

Ahwahnee

Meadow

Valley Visitor

Center Lost 

Arrow

Concessioner

Garage

Concessioner

General

Office

Residence 1

Indian Creek

Northside Drive

Sent ni el Dr vi e

Government 

Utility

Building

Concessioner

Maintenance

and Warehouse

Building

Church Bowl

Picnic Area

Sentinel Bridge

Housekeeping

Bridge

Superintendent's

Bridge

Housekeeping Camp

Yosemite Village Day-Use 

Village Store

Parking Area

Complex

0 0.25 Miles

ACTIONS COMMON TO ALLYOSEMITE VILLAGE AND HOUSEKEEPING CAMP

1

2

3 4 5

Yosemite Village

6

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: YOSEMITE VILLAGE AND HOUSEKEEPING CAMP1. Superintendent’s Bridge Area Cook’s Meadow South Boardwalk: Selectively thin conifers encroaching on open vistas across the meadows and  views of Yosemite Falls, Sentinel Rock, North Dome, and Glacier Point.  Superintendent’s Bridge Free-Flowing Condition: Install constructed log jams on the Merced River, and utilize  bioengineered stabilization on rip-rap to improve hydrologic function. Superintendent’s Bridge Scenic Views: Thin conifers to maintain views of Sentinel Rock and North Dome. Hutchings View: Selectively thin conifers to maintain distant views of Half Dome, Yosemite Falls, Sentinel Rock,  North Dome, Glacier Point, Royal Arches, and Washington Column. 2. Sentinel Bridge Area Free-Flowing Condition: Place large wood to lessen scouring from the bridge. Place a constructed log jam to  increase channel complexity.  Scenic Views: Selectively thin encroaching conifers and burn undergrowth to open distant views of Half Dome.  Informal Shoulder Parking: Remove roadside parking along Sentinel Drive that encroaches on sensitive habitat.  Ecologically restore area to natural conditions.3. West Yosemite Village Informal Shoulder Parking: Remove roadside parking along Cook's Meadow. Restore meadow conditions. Roadbed Restoration near Cook’s Meadow: Remove fill of former roadbed north of Northside Drive between the  Rangers’ Club and the three-way stop. Re-vegetate with native meadow species.4. East Yosemite Village Village Visitor Contact Center: Re-purpose the Village Sport Shop for public use with pathways leading from the  Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area to the building. Remove the Arts and Activities Center (aka Bank  Building).  Yosemite Village Services and Facilities: Retain Village Store and Grill. Re-purpose the Village Sport (Mountain)  Shop as a visitor contact center. Concessioner General Office: Remove building from river corridor. Re-locate essential concessioner functions  to the Concessioner Warehouse and Mainenance Building. Concessioner Garage Relocation: Remove Concessioner Garage building, and re-locate the function to the  Government Utility Building area, outside the river corridor. Re-develop garage footprint as visitor parking.  Expand visitor vehicle services in El Portal and Wawona service stations.  Indian Creek Area: Create a setback for Indian Creek by pulling parking and residential yard use back 50 feet  from the creek. Fence area and restore native riparian vegetation.5. Ahwahnee Meadow Area Valley Meadow Ditch Restoration: Fill 2,155 feet of human-constructed ditches in Valley. Ahwahnee Meadow Scenic Views: Selectively thin encroaching conifers from oak woodland and meadow to  maintain distant view of Yosemite Falls, North Dome, Royal Arches, Half Dome, Glacier Point, and Castle Cliffs.6. Housekeeping Camp Area Ecological Restoration and River Access: Restore riverbank by brush-layering, decompacting soils, and planting  riparian species. Direct visitors to two resilient beach locations at the western edge of camp. Fence off current  eastern river access point on a steep eroded bank.  Scenic Views: Selectively thin conifers to maintain views of Glacier Point and Yosemite Falls. Revetment Removal: Remove 3,400 feet of revetment built into the riverbank that impacts hydrologic flow.  Re-vegetate with riparian species. Replace an additional 2,300 feet of revetment with bioengineered riverbank  stabilization. Cultural Resource Protection Remove informal trails that contribute to archeological site disturbance. Develop historic structure report and  address recommendations for treatment to bring LeConte Memorial Lodge, which is an National Historic  Landmark, to “good condition.

COMMON TO ALL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Merced R vi er

oS u

ht side

Drive

Camp 4 

Campground

Yosemite

Lodge

Norths di e Dr vi e

Yosemite Creek

Bridge

Yosemite

Lodge Annex

Highland

Court

Sentinel Meadow

Leidig Meadow

0 500 Feet

ACTIONS COMMON TO ALLYOSEMITE LODGE AND CAMP 4

1

2

3

4

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: YOSEMITE LODGE AND CAMP 41. Yosemite Lodge Annex Leidig Meadow Bike Path: Replace a section of paved trail within the bed and banks of the river with an elevated  boardwalk. Yosemite Lodge Beach Access: Direct river access to the Swinging Bridge sandbar and fence sensitive riparian  area. Former Yosemite Lodge Cabin Area Restoration: Restore 4.5 acres on western portion of Yosemite Lodge  complex at site of lodging units removed after the 1997 flood. Remove fill, decompact soils, and plant native  riparian species. 2. Camp 4 Area Parking: Construct a 41-space parking lot for the Camp 4 Campground.  Camp 4 Campground: Retain 35 campsites. Expand Camp 4 eastward with 35 additional walk-in sites. Camp 4 Shuttle Stop: Construct a formal shuttle stop near Camp 4.3. Yosemite Lodge Area Yosemite Lodge Portico Scenic Views: Selectively thin conifers to maintain views of Sentinel Rock and Yosemite  Falls. Yosemite Lodge Concessioner Housing: Remove old and temporary housing at Highland Court and at the  Thousands Cabins.4. Sentinel Meadow Meadow Boardwalk: Add a 150-foot section of boardwalk to the west of the existing boardwalk to accommodate visitor use and reduce meadow trampling. Meadow Scenic Views: Selectively thin conifers to maintain view of Half Dome, Yosemite Falls, Sentinel Rock,  North Dome, Royal Arches, Cathedral Rocks, and Washington Column for boardwalk visitors .Cultural Resource Protection Divert visitor use away from large bedrock mortar next to trail. 

COMMON TO ALL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
El Capitan

Meadow

Sentinel

Beach

El Capitan 

Bridge

Cathedral

Beach

Swinging

Bridge

Camp 4 Campground

Souths di e Dr vi e North side Drive Merced River

Leidig 

Meadow

Slaughterhouse

Meadow

Cathedral Rocks

Sentinel

Rock

Lower Brother

Split Pinnacle

0 0.25 Miles

ACTIONS COMMON TO ALLWEST YOSEMITE VALLEY

1

2

3

4

YOSEMITE WILDERNESS

Ea g l e Cre ek

WEST YOSEMITE VALLEY1. El Capitan and West Valley Meadows Plant Community Changes: Improve condition of plant communities at specific locations in Yosemite Valley (67  potential acres targeted) by restoring the mosaic of meadow, riparian deciduous vegetation, black oak, and  open mixed conifer forest. Management actions could include re-vegetation, prescribed fire, mechanical  removal of conifers, and infrastructure re-design.  El Capitan Meadow Restoration: Re-route climber use trails on north side of road from meadow habitat to an  appropriate upland route (a few meters to the east). Remove informal trails through meadow and oak  woodland. Protect re-vegetated areas with fencing or other natural barriers and sign the area to reduce  trampling of sensitive meadow vegetation. As opportunities arise through maintenance or restoration projects,  improve hydrologic flow and meadow connectivity by extending the permeable road base across the entire  segment of Northside Drive through El Capitan Meadow and add additional box culverts with bottom  elevations equal to the meadow-surface elevation. Remove conifer saplings encroaching on meadow habitat. El Capitan Bridge River Access: Re-direct visitors accessing the Merced River near El Capitan Bridge from  sensitive riverbanks to resilient sandbar points. Fence and re-vegetate the eroded area. El Capitan Shuttle Stop: Construct a formal shuttle bus stop in a location appropriate for the design for the  restoration of the meadow and formalized river access. Upstream of El Capitan Moraine: Localized ecological restoration would enhance channel complexity in the  river reach upstream of the El Capitan moraine to the Sentinel picnic area. Restoration would include willow  planting, brush layering, uninhibited accumulation, and strategic placement of large wood.2. Devil’s Elbow and Cathedral Beach Devil’s Elbow Restoration: Relocate parking from Devil's Elbow to the east of current parking lot. Delineate a trail  for river access to the large sandbar to the east. Remove the informal trail. Restore meadow conditions. Cathedral Beach Picnic Area River Access: Designate a formal river access point, and direct use to more resilient  areas. Remove infrastructure in the 10-year floodplain. Restore area by fencing sensitive areas, decompacting  soils and planting native vegetation. Selectively thin conifers to maintain views of El Capitan3. Eagle Creek Area Eagle Creek Meadow Restoration: Remove Eagle Creek/Rocky Point sewage plant abandoned infrastructure to  restore 3.5 acres of meadow habitat. Remove berm and parking lot abutting the creek, add culverts to allow  dispersed water delivery, and re-vegetate with native plants. 4. Sentinel Beach and Swinging Bridge Area Sentinel Beach Picnic Area: Redesign the picnic area in its current location to better accommodate visitor-use  levels at this picnic area. Formalize parking. Designate formal river access point. Re-establish riparian vegetation. Fence off sensitive areas, and re-direct use to more resilient areas. Selectively thin deciduous trees  to open distant views upriver. Leidig Meadow Restoration: Remove informal trails that incise and fragment meadow. Restore native meadow  vegetation.  Swinging Bridge Ecological Restoration: Install protective fencing along denuded area. Re-vegetate with native  plants. Connect new fencing to bridge to direct river access to a large sandbar downstream. Place a constructed  log jam and large wood to lessen scouring from the bridge to improve hydrologic processes.  Swinging Bridge Picnic Area: Delineate picnic area by fencing and re-vegetate the river terrace 50 feet from the  river. Use fences to re-direct visitor use across the bridge to river access to the Swinging Bridge sandbar.  Remove revetment. Rebuild riverbank through bioengineering techniques. Re-establish riparian vegetation.Cultural Resource Protection Rehabilitate informal trails that impact archeological sites. Prohibit climbing on rock art boulders. Divert visitor  use away from prehistoric rock art shelter. Increase interpretation and education effort about cultural resources  for climbers and other visitors.

COMMON TO ALL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Merced R vi er

Merced Lake

Ranger Station

Merced

Lake

Merced Lake

High Sierra Camp

Merced Lake

Backpackers

Camping Area

Merced Lake

East Meadow

0 0.2 Miles ACTIONS COMMON TO ALL

MERCED LAKE HIGH SIERRA CAMP

1

River Corridor Boundary

Yosemite

Wilderness

2

Old El Portal

Abbieville

Trailer

Village

Rancheria

Flat

NPS Warehouse &AdministrativeComplex

Fo rest a Road

SIERRA NATIONAL FOREST

STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST

National Park Boundary

à Greenemeyer Sand Pit

H i ghway 14 0

Hwy. 140 Bridge

0 0.4 Miles

ACTIONS COMMON TO ALLEL PORTAL

1¬«

2¬«

 ̄

R vi er Corr di or Boundary

Merced River 3¬«

4¬«

5¬«

MERCED LAKE HIGH SIERRA CAMP1. Merced Lake Shore Meadow Restoration: Ecologically restore the meadow adjacent to the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp. Remove informal trails, decompact soils, fill ruts with native soils, and re-vegetate  denuded areas.2. Special-Status Plants Restoration: Re-route trails out of wetlands to avoid special-status plant habitat. 

EL PORTAL1. NPS Administrative Complex Parking: Formalize and pave dirt parking area located across Foresta Road from NPS Warehouse building, using best management practices, within existing footprint. Remove  informal roadside parking, between Foresta Road and the Merced River, and ecologically restore the area.2. Rancheria Flat Employee Housing: Construct infill housing units to replace removed temporary housing in Yosemite Valley (the number of infill units varies across the alternatives).3. Greenemeyer Sand Pit Restoration: Ecologically restore the former mine operation area to natural conditions. Remove nonnative fill material and re-contour.4. Abbieville and Trailer Village Restoration: Remove asphalt and imported fill. Re-contour and plant native riparian species and oaks within 150 feet of the river. 5. Old El Portal Employee Housing: Construct infill-housing units, for 12 beds, in Old El Portal to replace Yosemite Valley temporary housing.  Valley Oaks Restoration: Protect valley oaks in El Portal through best management practices related to invasive species removal, overwatering, tree pruning, and prohibiting grading 

 and parking in the drip line of valley oaks.  Fuel Storage Facility in the Floodplain: Remove bulk fuel storage facility, all associated development, and non-native fill from the floodplain. Decompact soils, and plant appropriate  native plant species, including valley oak. Relocate the fuel storage area outside the Merced River corridor or find an alternate source for emergency fuel supplies.Cultural Resource Protection Address abandoned infrastructure, and remove informal trails, and non-essential roads to protect archeological resources. The plan to address abandoned infrastructure will be  developed in consultation with traditionally associated American Indian tribes and groups. Any solution developed will include a recommended approach for deterring visitor use.

COMMON TO ALL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
River Corridor Boundary

Wawona Maintenance

Area

Wawona Hotel

Wawona Golf

Course

Wawona Store Picnic Area

South Fork Picnic Area

Wawona

Campground

Bi

Cr

g

ee k

South For k Merced River

Wawona

Stables

0 0.1 0.2 Miles ACTIONS COMMON TO ALL

WAWONA

1

2

3

4

WAWONA1. Wawona Campground and South Fork Picnic Area Wawona Campground Septic System: Remove septic system, and connect to the sewer system. Build a lift  station above the campground to connect to the existing water treatment plant. South Fork Picnic Area: Delineate picnic area. Add formal river access and path to the South Fork Merced River  that encourages visitors to walk in resilient areas.2. Wawona Store Area Picnic Area and River Access: Add picnic benches. Place fencing to direct visitors to three hardened river access  points. Add a path to river that encourages visitors to walk in resilient areas. Parking: Retain day-use parking. Formalize eight tour bus parking spaces at Wawona Store. Remove roadside  parking between store and Chilnualna Falls Road. Shuttle Stop: Retain all shuttles. Re-design bus stop for both tour buses and shuttles to accommodate existing  visitor-use levels. Public Restroom: Replace existing public restroom facilities with larger restrooms to accommodate existing  visitor-use levels. Wawona Recreational Vehicle Dump Station: Relocate the RV dump station to the Wawona Campground, away  from the river. Design and construct the RV dump station on a new sewer line near the campground entrance, at  least 150 feet away from the ordinary high-water mark.3. Wawona Hotel Area Lodging: Retain the existing 104 lodging units at the Wawona Hotel. Services/Facilities: Retain hotel restaurant and swimming pool. 4. Wawona Maintenance Area  Operations: Construct a building and grounds facility, a combined structural and wildland fire station, and a  roads facility. Rehabilitate CCC structures for potential re-use. Ecological Restoration: Remove staged materials, abandoned utilities, vehicles, and parking lot within 150 feet  of the river. Restore native ecosystem. Cultural Resource Protection Relocate two stock use campground sites from sensitive resource area. Remove informal trails. Remove shoulder  and off-road parking from sensitive resource area. Follow the Wawona Hotel Historic Structures Report to bring  contributing elements to “good” condition.

COMMON TO ALL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-67 

Free-flowing Condition 

Management considerations associated with this river value include the riverbank riprap, infrastructure within 

the bed and banks of the river, and bridges. These considerations would be addressed under all the action 

alternatives by removing riprap (although the amount of riprap removed would vary by alternative) and by 

removing abandoned infrastructure from the river channel. Once these structures were removed, the natural 

topography would be restored and the sites would be revegetated with native riparian vegetation. The 

alternatives would vary differ primarily in whether any of the historic bridges would also be removed from the 

bed and banks of the river to improve free flow. To prevent future impacts, the NPS would require all projects 

involving construction within the bed or banks of the river to undergo a Section 7 analysis as described in 

Chapter 4. 

The actions common to Alternatives 2-6 are listed below, by segment. 

All Segments 

 Develop a set of best management practices for revetment construction and repair throughout the 

river corridor. Practices would include use of vertical retaining walls where possible to limit 

impacts on the river channel. 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

 Remove riprap from a minimum of 5,700 linear feet of river bank to restore natural river processes. 

Replace riprap with native riparian vegetation, and revegetate the river banks with riparian species 

(3,400 linear feet). Use bioengineering techniques where riverbank stabilization is necessary for 

infrastructure protection (2,300 linear feet). 

 Remove remnants of former sewer treatment facilities, sewer and water lines, and man-holes. 

 Remove the abutments and infrastructure associated with the former Happy Isles footbridge; 

remove the river gauge base. 

 Move the gauging station north of the river outside of the bed and banks of the river. 

 Place large wood to lessen the scouring from the bridge abutments on all remaining bridges. Use 

brush layering and place constructed log jams. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

 Remove abandoned infrastructure and imported fill at the Cascades Picnic Area, Abbieville, and 

Trailer Village. 

 Ecologically restore to natural conditions at Greenemeyer Sandpit by removing fill material and recontouring while maintaining river and utility access. 

 Develop standards for revetment construction and repair throughout the river corridor. Vertical 

walls should be used wherever possible. Provide Caltrans with recommendations when 

repair/replacement is necessary. 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

A water conservation plan is in effect at Wawona to help ensure that water withdrawals remain within levels 

determined by a minimum flow analysis to be protective of the river’s free flowing condition and water 
ALTERNATIVES

8-68 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

quality (see Chapter 5). Additionally the following actions would be taken under Alternatives 2-6 to protect 

the river’s free-flowing condition. 

 Retain the current water collection and distribution system at the Wawona Impoundment. 

 Remove abandoned infrastructure from the South Fork side channel. 

Water Quality 

Management considerations pertaining to water quality include the impacts of surface water runoff from 

parking lots; potential hazards related to dump stations, septic tanks, and leach fields; and accelerated 

erosion and potential sediment loading in the Merced River. These considerations would be addressed 

under all the action alternatives by relocating facilities away from the river. (Actions to address accelerated 

riverbank erosion and potential sediment loading are addressed under “Geologic/Hydrologic Values,” 

below.)The common actions that would be taken under Alternatives 2-6 are listed below, by segment. 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

 Relocate the Upper Pines Dump Station away from the river to a site between Curry Village and the 

entrance to the Pines Campgrounds. 

 Move the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area (Camp 6 portion) away from the river and 

implement best management practices to mitigate stormwater runoff (see Appendix C: Mitigation 

Measures). 

Segment 4: El Portal 

 Pave the parking area at the NPS Maintenance and Administrative Complex using best 

management practices (see Appendix C, Mitigation Measures) to formalize employee parking 

within the existing footprint. Remove the informal parking sites between Foresta Road and the 

river and restore the site to natural conditions. 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

 Retain the current water collection and distribution system. 

 Remove the current septic system for the Wawona campground. Develop a wastewater collection 

system and a pump station above the campground to connect the facility to the existing wastewater 

treatment plant. 

 Relocate the Wawona RV dump site away from the river. Design and construct the RV dump 

station on a new sewer line near the campground entrance, at least 150 feet away from the ordinary 

high water mark. 

 Delineate the boundaries of the two formal picnic areas in Wawona. Add formal river access points 

and paths to river that encourages visitors to walk in the resilient areas. Harden the three steep river 

access points at the Wawona Store Picnic Area using rockwork or staircase construction to prevent 

riverbank erosion. If needed, place fencing to direct visitors to these hardened access points. 

Geologic/Hydrologic Values 

The fundamental alluvial processes in Yosemite Valley are affected by accelerated riverbank erosion in 

localized areas, lack of natural levels of large wood in the river system, altered surface and groundwater flow 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-69 

patterns, and alterations to the distribution and extent of connected floodplain. Management 

considerations and concerns about riverbank stability and channel widening (see Chapter 5) would be 

addressed under all the action alternatives by enhancing channel complexity and mitigating the scouring 

that has been encouraged by riverbank instability. Effort would be focused on Segment 2 through Yosemite 

Valley. (Restoration of riparian habitat addressed further under “Biological Values,” below.) 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

 Incorporate large wood into riverbanks to enhance habitat quality and provide structure for eroded 

riverbanks. Place large wood in river to enhance channel complexity and mitigate scouring from 

bridges. Construct eight log jams in the river channel between Clark’s Bridge and Sentinel Bridge to 

address river widening and low channel complexity. Design log jams to look natural, retaining root 

wads and avoiding straight-cut edges. (This work is described in detail in Chapter 5 and in the 

Ecological Restoration Plan in Appendix E.) 

 Remove the berm and parking lot abutting Eagle Creek to improve drainage and reduce 

channelization; add culverts to allow more dispersed water delivery to the Eagle Creek Meadow; 

revegetate with native upland species. 

 Plant willows, install brush layering, and allow uninhibited accumulation and strategic placement of 

large wood to enhance channel complexity in localized areas of the river reach upstream of the 

El Capitan moraine to the Sentinel picnic area. 

Biological Values 

As described in detail in Chapter 5, management concerns include meadow fragmentation in several 

Yosemite Valley meadows localized impacts on riparian habitat along the river. These concerns would be 

addressed under Alternatives 2-6 through an extensive ecological restoration program that is described in 

detail in Chapter 5 and in the Ecological Restoration Plan in Appendix E. Alternatives 2-6 would differ 

primarily in the width of a riparian buffer along the river (and consequently in the amount of existing 

development that would be removed from the riparian zone) and in the extent of meadow restoration (and 

consequently in the amount of existing development that would be removed from meadows). The major 

common actions are summarized below, by segment: 

All Segments 

 Establish a 150-foot riparian buffer for all segments of the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Prohibit 

new development within this buffer, which would extend 150 feet beyond the ordinary high-water 

mark on both sides of the river. 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

Meadow Habitat 

 Remove informal trails that incise meadow habitat, trails in wet and/or sensitive vegetation, and 

trails that fragment meadow habitat, including trails in the Triple Peak Fork meadow, wetlands near 

Echo Valley and Merced Lake shore, mineral springs between Merced Lake and Washburn Lake, 

and other areas as necessary. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-70 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Riparian Habitat 

 At a minimum, remove existing campsites from within 100 feet of the bed and banks of the river. 

(Some alternatives would remove additional development for a wider riparian buffer; see Chapter 5 

for a detailed discussion of riparian buffers). This would require the removal of some campsites 

from the Backpackers Camp, North Pines Campground, and Lower Pine Campground (including 

removal of the loop between sites 60-62 that is within the bed and banks of the river); a portion of 

the Yosemite Village day parking; and many of the lodging units at Housekeeping Camp. (The 

alternatives would differ in the possible replacement of these facilities.) 

 Establish a 50-foot buffer for Indian Creek. At 

Ahwahnee Row and Tecoya Dorms, relocate parking 

and reduce residential yards so that they are outside 

the 50-foot buffer; restore native riparian vegetation 

and protect with restoration fencing. 

 Redirect visitor use to more stable and resilient river 

access points, such as sandbars, and designate formal 

river access sites. Use fencing and signing to protect 

sensitive areas and restore native riparian vegetation. 

Locations would include Upper Pines Campground, 

Upper and Lower River Campgrounds, and 

Housekeeping Camp (refer to Appendix E for 

additional site-specific details). 

 Pave and formalize five roadside pull-outs for river access Between Pohono Bridge and the 

intersection of the Big Oak Flat Road. Install curbing along pull-outs and along El Portal Road to 

prevent further encroachment towards the river and associated resource damage. Completely 

remove one pull-out that is not protective of resources. In the areas that require ecological 

restoration following parking and river access formalization, decompact soil and revegetate with 

riparian species, including willow. Install drainage improvements and head walls at 11 locations. 

 Use brush layering techniques to repair localized riverbank erosion, and revegetate areas with 

appropriate native plants. Protect revegetated areas with closure signs, fencing, and/or natural 

barriers, such as rocks and logs. Riverbanks that would be addressed include those adjacent to 

Backpackers Camp and the Lower Pines and North Pines Campgrounds; Housekeeping Camp; the 

Yosemite Lodge beach access; the Swinging Bridge, Sentinel Beach, and Cathedral Beach picnic 

areas Devil’s Elbow; the riverside areas between Pohono Bridge and the El Portal Road/Big Oak 

Flat Road intersection; and along the Valley Loop Trail. (See Appendix E for a detailed description 

of these ecological restoration actions.) 

 In accordance with NPS policy, continue management toward removal of nonnative species, and 

re-introduction of extirpated or declining species as priorities and opportunities are developed. 

Prioritize studies of the Western pond turtle and foothill yellow-legged frog. 

Meadow Habitat 

Ecological restoration of meadows in Yosemite Valley would involve the following general kinds of 

management activities: 

 Remove abandoned infrastructure (including tiles, pipes, and abandoned roads) from meadow, 

riparian, and floodplain habitat. Decompact soils, remove fill, and revegetate with riparian species. 

Areas that would be addressed include the former Eagle Creek/Rocky Point Sewage Plant site, 

Royal Arches Meadow, Cook’s Meadow, western (closed) portion of former Lower Pines 

Campground, and the former lodge cabin/volunteer center at Yosemite Lodge. 

Conceptual site drawings for river 

access improvements along El Portal 

Road have been completed to allow 

the analysis of impacts of this 

potential project. See “Conceptual 

Site Drawings” at the end of the 

“Common to Alternatives 2-6” 

discussion for site details and design 

drawings. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-71 

 Improve meadow hydrology by removing artificial fill, filling ditches, and constructing culverts to 

enhance water flows into meadows (actions in particular meadows would sometimes vary among 

alternatives). 

 Remove 6 miles of informal trails in Yosemite Valley meadows; restore natural conditions by 

decompacting soils, filling ruts with native soils, and revegetating denuded vegetation with 

appropriate native plants. Define and delineate formal trails in meadows with signs, fencing, and/or 

other natural barriers such as rocks and logs 

 Eliminate some roadside parking and fence some areas to reduce the potential for informal trailing 

through sensitive meadow habitat. 

 Improve the condition of plant communities at specific locations in Yosemite Valley (67 potential 

acres targeted) by restoring the mosaic of meadow, riparian deciduous, black oak, and open mixed 

conifer forest vegetation. Management actions could include revegetation, prescribed fire, 

mechanical removal of conifers, and infrastructure redesign. 

Specific meadows in Yosemite Valley would receive the following protective management under 

Alternatives 2-6 (additional actions might be taken to further enhance these meadows under some 

alternatives): 

 Bridalveil Meadow: Address stream headcutting by inserting live willow cuttings into the 

disturbed riverbank and adjacent meadow; reestablish the riparian shrub layer in the meadow to 

enhance meadow habitat. 

 El Capitan Meadow: Remove all informal trails; restore areas disturbed by foot traffic and other 

areas of bare, compacted soils to natural conditions. Reroute climber use trails on the north side of 

the road away from the El Capitan meadow habitat to an appropriate upland route (a few meters to 

the east). As opportunities arise through maintenance or restoration projects, improve hydrologic 

flow and meadow connectivity by extending the permeable road base across the entire segment of 

Northside Drive through El Capitan Meadow and add additional box culverts with bottom 

elevations equal to the meadow surface elevation. Remove conifer saplings encroaching on 

meadow habitat. 

 Eagle Creek Meadow: Remove abandoned infrastructure from the vicinity of Eagle Creek; restore 

the meadow to natural conditions. 

 Leidig Meadow: Replace a section of paved trail with an elevated boardwalk. 

 Cooks Meadow: Remove roadside parking along Cook’s Meadow at Sentinel Drive and Northside 

Drive; remove informal trails in Cook's Meadow; ecologically restore meadow to natural 

conditions. Address use patterns to protect meadow habitat and black oak woodland (this action 

would additionally enhance the cultural value of the black oak woodland). 

 Ahwahnee Meadow: Remove abandoned irrigation lines and fill, fill in ditches, and re-vegetate 

with native meadow vegetation. Remove the abandoned tennis courts from the black oak 

woodland. Reconnect currently disjunct portions of Ahwahnee Meadow by removing conifers 

(about 5.7 acres of meadow restoration). Remove the abandoned tennis courts from the black oak 

woodland. 

 Stoneman Meadow: Redesign the Orchard Parking Lot and apply engineering solutions to 

promote water flow from the cliff walls to Stoneman Meadow. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

100-Year Floodplain 

 Ecologically restore the Greenemeyer sand pit. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-72 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

 Restore the rare floodplain community of valley oaks in Old El Portal through implementation of 

best management practices. Create a valley oak recruitment area of 2.5 acre in Old El Portal in the 

vicinity of the current Odger’s bulk fuel storage area, including the adjacent parking lots. 

Decompact soils, plant appropriate native understory plant species, and treat invasive plants. 

Prohibit new building construction within the oak recruitment area. 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

Riparian Habitat 

 Relocate or remove all campsites at the Wawona campground currently within 100 feet of the bed 

and banks of the river; ecologically restore native riparian habitat. 

Cultural Values 

Cultural values are associated with traditionally used plant populations, archeological sites throughout the 

corridor, and historic resources in Yosemite Valley and at Wawona. Management concerns include the 

sustainability of traditionally used plant populations, notably black oak in Yosemite Valley. Management 

considerations include impacts to archeological sites caused by visitor use, and the condition of certain 

historic buildings and structures that are currently only in fair condition. These concerns and 

considerations would be addressed similarly under Alternatives 2-6, with little difference among the 

alternatives. The major common actions are summarized below, by segment: 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Traditionally Used Plant Populations 

Natural conditions for traditionally used plant populations would be restored in selected locations: 

 Implement specific actions in the ecological restoration plan and the invasive plant management 

program aimed at addressing impacts to traditionally used plant populations. 

 Introduce new black oak seedlings into stands stressed by past human activities. 

 Implement more general actions to restore ecological conditions to meadow and riparian areas. 

Archeological Sites 

Many of the actions common to Alternatives 2-6 related primarily to visitor use and ecological restoration 

would also be protective of archeological sites. In addition, all the action alternatives would include ongoing 

inventory, documentation and monitoring, increased interpretation and outreach to help visitors 

understand the importance of protecting sensitive resources, and the development of archeological site 

management plans for areas with complex uses and impacts. The common actions are listed below. 

 Protect archeological sites by managing visitor use and development: 

- Manage visitor use levels; design and locate facilities to direct use and avoid sensitive 

cultural and ethnographic resource areas. 

- Remove informal trails; use natural features to conceal and divert foot traffic around sites. 

- Protect rock art by removing graffiti and installing fencing to discourage inappropriate 

visitor use. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-73 

 Mitigate the potential effects of ecological restoration activities on archeological sites by using 

noninvasive techniques wherever possible. 

 Remove climbing hardware from sensitive cultural features. 

 Develop site management plans for archeological sites in areas with complex uses and impacts, 

such as Yosemite Village. The purpose of the plans would be to avoid resource loss through park 

actions such as development, repair, and maintenance of facilities and underground utilities. 

Historic Structures 

Historic structures that have fallen into fair or poor condition would be managed to return them to good 

condition through the following actions: 

 Implement the recommendations from the Ahwahnee Historic Structures Report (1997) and the 

Ahwahnee Cultural Landscape Report (2010) when redesigning the Ahwahnee parking lot to bring 

the Ahwahnee stone gate house and the Ahwahnee parking lot to “good” condition. 

 Develop a historic structures report for the LeConte Memorial Lodge National Historic Landmark 

to determine the rehabilitation needed to bring the building to “good” condition. 

 Rehabilitate the Superintendent’s House (Residence 1) per the Secretary of the Interior's Standards 

for the Treatment of Historic Properties (NPS 1995) and the Historic Structure Report (Lingo 

2012) to bring the building to “good” condition. This rehabilitation of the building would occur 

under all action alternatives, regardless of whether the building was relocated. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

Archeological Sites 

In recognition of the high cultural significance of sites CA-MRP-0181/H, CA-MRP-0250/H and CA-MRP0251/H for traditionally associated American Indians, these sites would be protected from any further 

development. In addition, the following management action would occur: 

 Prepare a plan of action for addressing the abandoned infrastructure on site CA-MRP-0181/H in 

consultation with traditionally associated American Indian tribes and groups. Any solution(s) 

developed would include a recommended approach for deterring visitor use within the site. 

Segment 5: South Fork above Wawona 

Archeological Sites 

The rock rings in this segment would be protected as follows: 

 Complete documentation of rock ring features 

 Remove informal trails and charcoal rings 

 Inform Wilderness visitors about the importance of protecting archeological resources, and restrict 

Wilderness camping in the area of the site. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-74 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

Archeological Sites 

Impacts to the Wawona Archeological District associated with park operations, visitor use, and natural 

forces would be minimized by the following management actions: 

 Increase monitoring frequency for affected sites; increase management protection designed to 

counteract or minimize impacts, crafted to individual site specifications. At the districtwide level, 

amend the district’s National Register of Historic Places nomination to reflect district changes and 

impacts. 

 Remove seven campsites from the Wawona Campground in culturally sensitive areas. 

 Remove shoulder and off-road parking at the Wawona Hotel to protect cultural resources. 

Historic Structures 

 Follow the recommendations from the Wawona Hotel Historic Structures Report (2012) to return 

the contributing elements at Clark Cottage to good condition. 

 Follow the recommendations from the Wawona Hotel Historic Structures Report (2012) to return 

the contributing elements at the Main Hotel, Manager's Cottage, and Annex Building to good 

condition. 

Scenic Values 

As described in detail in Chapter 5, visitor and administrative facilities intrude into the outstandingly 

remarkable natural scenery at several locations within the river corridor. Notable visual intrusions are 

caused by the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp (Segment 1) and by certain roads, traffic, and structures in 

Yosemite Valley (Segment 2). Natural scenery in Yosemite Valley is also diminished by unnatural conditions 

along river banks and in meadows, where eroded or compacted soils and denuded or trampled vegetation 

detracts from views. In other locations vegetation is intruding into views from scenic vista points 

traditionally enjoyed by park visitors, or into direct and foreground views of the river, often with peaks and 

walls rising in the background. 

These considerations would be addressed under all the action alternatives by ecologically restoring natural 

conditions to riparian and meadow habitat, ensuring that future development is protective of scenic values, 

and managing vegetation at important vista points to protect viewing opportunities. The alternatives would 

differ primarily in the amount of existing development that would be removed to protect scenic values. The 

actions common to Alternatives 2-6 are listed below, by segment. 

Wild Segments 1 and 5: Wilderness above Nevada Fall and South Fork Merced River 

Above Wawona 

Visual intrusions in these wild segments would be reduced or avoided through the following actions: 

 Conduct a Visual Resource Management (VRM) contrast analysis (described in Chapter 5) to 

ensure that future development would not exceed a contrast rating of 4. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-75 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Reduce visual intrusions by removing unnecessary facilities from the river corridor (see the Analysis of 

Public-Use Facilities and Services, below, for the list of facilities that would be removed under all the action 

alternatives). 

Improve natural scenery as part of the ecological restoration program: 

 Ecologically restore eroded river banks, informal trails, and riparian vegetation that affect direct 

and foreground views of the river, river-dependent resources, and the peaks and walls rising above 

the river. 

 Avoid future visual intrusions into the riparian zone by requiring a 150-foot setback from the 

ordinary high-water mark for any new development. 

 Eliminate visual intrusions from meadows associated with informal trails. 

Protect air quality by continuing to cooperate with regional authorities to reduce airborne contaminants 

caused by combustion, including carbon dioxide emissions, smoke caused by fire, and particulate matter 

generated by construction. 

Ensure that new development or redevelopment in Yosemite Valley is protective of scenic values: 

 Follow the guidance provided in “A Sense of Place: Design Guidelines for Yosemite Valley” in the 

location and design of new facilities. These design guidelines are intended to promote harmony 

between the built and natural environments. 

 Conduct a Visual Resource Management (VRM) contrast analysis (described in Chapter 5) to 

ensure that future development would not exceed a contrast rating of 13 for West Yosemite Valley 

or a contrast rating of 22 for East Yosemite Valley. 

 Selectively thin conifers and other trees and shrubs that encroach on selected scenic vista points 

(47 vista points, 14 of which have prominent views of the river in the foreground and 33 of which 

occur within the broader river corridor). See Appendix H, Scenic Vista Actions in the Merced River 

Corridor, for details regarding scenic vista actions. 

Segment 3: Merced Gorge 

Ensure that new development or redevelopment is protective of scenic values: 

 Conduct a Visual Resource Management (VRM) contrast analysis (described in Chapter 5) to 

ensure that future development would not exceed a contrast rating of 13. 

Recreational Values 

As described in Chapter 5, management considerations for the recreational value in the wild segment above 

Nevada Fall are high levels of use and crowding at designated camping areas and high encounter rates along 

the trail between Little Yosemite Valley and Merced Lake. 

In Yosemite Valley, the NPS determined there is a management concern on the recreational value resulting 

from a substantial shortage of parking available during the summer season (see Chapter 5 for more 

information). In addition, there are management considerations regarding the supply of Wilderness 

parking, insufficient parking at The Ahwahnee, crowding and congestion at popular attraction sites, and 

resource impacts resulting from boating activity. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-76 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

Alternatives 2-6 provide options to reduce, repurpose, or remove the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp to 

address impacts on wilderness experience at that location. Alternatives 2-6 also propose reductions in the 

Wilderness zone capacities to address crowding and encounter rates on trails (see User Capacities, Land 

Use, and Facilities Management – Visitor Overnight Capacity – Segment 1, below, for more on zone 

capacities.) 

In addition, the following actions would be common to Alternatives 2-6: 

Recreation Activity Participation 

 Provide opportunities for hiking, backpacking, and stock-use. 

 Allow private boating on the stretch of river above Nevada Fall. 

Recreational Setting Attributes 

 Enhance wilderness quality by providing education on “Leave-No-Trace” and minimum impact 

practices, maintainging regulations on food storage, area closers, resource monitoring, and regular 

ranger patrols and trail maintenance. Actions to protect natural and cultural ORVs would also 

benefit the recreational values by providing high quality settings for visitors to enjoy. 

Recreational Experience Quality 

 Provide opportunities for solitude in designated Wilderness by managing overnight capacity 

through the Wilderness trailhead quota and permit system, maintaining group size limits, 

monitoring resources to study the effects of visitor use, and implementing area closures where 

necessary to protect river values. 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Alternatives 2-6 consider a variety of management responses to address the management considerations 

identified in Chapter 5. Primary among these is the user capacity management program, which is used to 

drive decisions that result in common actions specifically addressing user capacity. (These are presented 

below under the heading “User Capacity, Land Use, and Facilities Management.”) User capacity, as it relates 

to specific locations and uses, is also addressed in detail and under each individual alternative. 

Many general actions regarding the recreational setting, recreational activities, and quality of the 

recreational experience in Yosemite Valley would be common to Alternatives 2-6, and these are 

summarized below: 

Recreational Activity Participation 

A range of high-quality, resource-based recreational and interpretive opportunities would be sustained by 

 continuing use of the camping and lodging reservation systems 

 improving facilities such as restrooms and trails 

 improving infrastructure to promote access for people with disabilities 

 monitoring and studying the effects of visitor use 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-77 

Boating would be managed to prevent resource impacts by 

 designating put-in and take-out locations 

 conducting periodic checks of vessels for aquatic invasive species; and maintaining the prohibition 

on motorized boats 

Swimming would be allowed on all segments of the river, except where disallowed in the Superintendent’s 

Compendium. 

Recreational Setting Attributes 

Monitoring of the visitor densities and parking occupancies would ensure use does not exceed acceptable 

levels for key attraction sites and parking areas that provide for recreational access to the river. Actions to 

protect natural and cultural ORVs would also benefit the recreational values providing high quality settings 

for visitors to enjoy. 

Recreational Experience Quality 

Under Alternatives 2-6, monitoring of the visitor densities and parking occupancies (see Chapter 5) would 

ensure use did not exceed acceptable levels for key attraction sites and parking areas that provide for 

recreational access to the river. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Visitor Activities and Services 

The overall diversity of activities that currently exists within the river corridor would generally be retained 

under Alternatives 2-6. 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

The primary river-related activities would remain hiking and overnight backpacking. The following 

management actions would be common to Alternatives 2-6: 

Use would be managed in accordance with the findings of the “Determination of Extent Necessary” 

(Appendix L). Following is a summary of the management that would be common to all the action alternatives: 

 Disallow camping or travel by commercial groups more than 1⁄4 mile from a maintained trail or 

public access road. 

 Limit all commercial stock trips to a 1:1.5 person-to-stock ratio. Accordingly, for every multiple of 

3 persons (including employees), only two pack animals would be allowed in addition to three 

riding stock. 

 Apply additional seasonal and weekend restrictions in the Mount Lyell, Merced Lake, and Little 

Yosemite Valley zones as specified in Appendix L. 

 Private boating would be allowed using dispersed, undesignated put-ins and take-outs. Generally, 

this kind of use would consist of short floats using pack raft or other craft that can easily be carried 

into this remote area. (The alternatives would vary in whether or not use levels would be 

restricted.) 
ALTERNATIVES

8-78 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

The primary river-related activities would remain swimming, floating and water play, fishing, hiking, biking, 

climbing, camping, creative pursuits (such as writing, painting, photography), and educational and 

interpretive pursuits (such as attending ranger-led walks and programs). All the action alternatives would 

include the following actions to protect and enhance river-related recreation and reduce congestion at 

attraction sites: 

 Allow private boating (commercial boating would be allowed only under Alternatives 4 and 6). 

Expected water craft would include rafts, kayaks, paddle boards, inner tubes, and inflatable 

mattresses. The locations where boating would be allowed would also vary among the alternatives. 

 Create an interpretive nature walk through the Lower River area that emphasizes river-related 

natural processes, the park’s ecological restoration work, and what visitors can do to protect the 

river. 

 Improve opportunities for picnicking at the Cathedral, Sentinel, and Swimming Bridge picnic areas. 

 Discontinue stock day rides provided by the concessioner. 

 Improve the sense of arrival for park visitors as they are guided toward the primary Yosemite 

Village day-use parking area. 

 Reduce congestion at Bridalveil Fall by redesigning trails, boardwalks, and the viewing platform at 

the base of the fall; improve accessibility; provide restrooms. 

Alternatives 2-6 would eliminate services and facilities that were not determined necessary for public use. 

All existing and potential facilities were analyzed against two criteria: Is the facility needed for public use or 

resource protection, and if the facility is necessary, is it feasible to relocate it outside the river corridor? The 

results of this analysis, conducted for both visitor use and administrative facilities across all segments of the 

river corridor, is presented in tables located near the end of each alternative description. Results that were 

common across Alternatives 2-6 are presented in Table 8-11 at the end of this Actions Common to 

Alternatives 2-6 section. The following is a summary of the findings of that analysis related to visitor 

facilities in Segment 2: 

 Visitor facilities that would be removed under all alternatives: 

- The Ahwahnee swimming pool and tennis court 

- Yosemite Village concessioner general offices, garage, and the art activity center/bank 

building (relocated outside the river corridor) 

- Yosemite Lodge swimming pool, snack stand, bike stand, and post office 

- Happy Isles snack stand 

- Curry village ice rink, bike stand, raft stand, and stock day rides 

 Visitor facilities that would be reduced or converted to another use: 

- Yosemite Village sports shop (converted to noncommercial visitor use) 

- Yosemite Lodge nature shop (converted to noncommercial visitor use) 

- Lower Pines and North Pines Campgrounds (reduced) 

- Housekeeping Camp Lodging Units (reduced) 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-79 

Segment 3: Merced Gorge 

Alternatives 2-6 would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use as exist today. The primary activity in 

this segment would remain scenic driving along Highway 140, with some picnicking, swimming, and fishing 

in summer, when the river is low and the air and water temperatures are warm, and rock-climbing during 

the spring and fall seasons, when the rock is dry and temperatures are cool. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

Most recreational activities that currently take place in this segment are swimming, fishing, and boating by 

community residents, while the vast majority of park visitors pass through enroute to Yosemite Valley and 

other park destinations. However, additional use by visitors who might not continue into the park would be 

expected in this segment in the future. This use would be supported under Alternatives 2-6 by constructing 

an additional public restroom to accommodate visitors recreating in the El Portal segment. 

Segment 5: South Fork Merced above Wawona 

Recreational activities in this segment would remain limited to occasional overnight backpacking, day 

hiking, and stock-assisted pack trips. The finding of the Determination of Extent Necessary (Appendix L) 

for commercial use in wilderness would be implemented across the action alternatives. 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

The current range of visitor recreation activities would remain at Wawona. River-related activities would 

include swimming, fishing, boating, picnicking, camping, and education and interpretation at the History 

Museum. The Wawona impoundment would remain closed to visitor use due to water quality and safety 

concerns. Therefore, the summary of user capacity provided below pertains only to Segment 7, where the 

following actions would be common to Alternatives 2-6: 

 Replace the existing public restroom facilities next to the Wawona Store with larger restrooms to 

accommodate visitor use levels. 

 Increase the number of picnic tables to accommodate more picnicking near the Wawona Store. 

 Redesign Wawona Store bus stop (for both tour buses and shuttles) with seating and sun cover to 

accommodate the current volume and types of use. 

 Provide access to the Wawona Swinging Bridge on the south side of the river on public land, 

delineating a trail and formal access that includes restrooms, waste disposal, and parking. 

Segment 8: South Fork Merced below Wawona 

Most use along this segment would remain swimming or hiking by day visitors. The NPS would continue to 

allow kayakers attempting the Class 5 multi-day adventure down the South Fork through the Sierra 

National Forest to put in below the Wawona Campground. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

Overnight capacity would be managed through ongoing permit and reservation systems. The Wilderness 

permit system would manage use in the backcountry, while the reservation systems would manage 

frontcountry camping and lodging accommodations. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-80 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

Backpack camping would continue at undesignated sites dispersed throughout the wilderness. (The 

alternatives would vary in whether or not facilities would be provided to support backpack camping.) 

The zone capacities for Merced Lake, Washburn Lake, Mount Lyell and Clark Range zones would remain 

the same across Alternatives 2-6 (Table 8-9). 

TABLE 8-9: WILDERNESS ZONE CAPACITIES SEGMENT 1 

Wilderness Zones Common to All 

Zonewide Capacity 

Common to All Zone Capacity 

Specific to the River Corridor 

Merced Lake Zone 50 50

Washburn Lake Zone 150 100

Mount Lyell Zone 50 10

Clark Range Zone 50 10

* Note: Little Yosemite Valley (LYV): The number of people in the LYV zone differs by alternative 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Camping 

New walk-in campgrounds would be provided under Alternatives 2-6 west of the Backpackers Camp (16 

sites) and east of Camp 4 (35 sites). These sites would partially offset the number of sites that would be 

removed under each alternative to restore ecological conditions (the number of which would differ among 

the alternatives). Common to Alternatives 2-6, two campsites would be removed from the Upper Pines 

Campground to protect cultural resources, and at the Lower Pines Campground, the loop road between 

sites 60 and 62 would be removed from the bed and banks of the river. The total amount of camping at all 

campgrounds would differ among the alternatives. 

Lodging 

Lodging at the Ahwahnee and the Wawona Hotel would remain at current levels under all the alternatives 

(123 units at the Ahwahnee and 104 units at the Wawona Hotel). Lodging at other locations would differ 

among the alternatives. 

Segment 3: Merced Gorge 

No overnight accommodations would exist in this segment under any alternative. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

No overnight visitor accommodations would exist in this segment under any alternative. Private overnight 

lodging located adjacent to the river and bounded by this segment would not be affected by any alternative 

as this lodging facility is on private land and is not regulated by the NPS. 

Segment 5: South Fork Merced above Wawona 

Very little overnight use would occur in this segment. The wilderness zone capacities would remain the 

same across Alternatives 2-6 (Table 8-10). 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-81 

TABLE 8-10: WILDERNESS ZONE CAPACITIES-SEGMENT 5 

Wilderness Zones Zone Capacity Zone Capacity in River Corridor 

South Fork Zone 150 15 

Johnson Creek Zone 50 5 

Chilnualna Creek Zone 100 0 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

The overnight capacity of the Wawona Hotel would remain the same at 104 rooms accommodating a 

maximum of 247 people per night. The capacity of the Wawona Campground would vary by alternative. 

Segment 8: South Form Merced below Wawona 

No overnight use would occur in this segment. 

Visitor Day Use Capacity 

The following paragraphs discuss the management of visitor day use and user capacity, which were 

introduced in Chapter 5 (as part of the discussion of management standards for river values) and Chapter 6 

(as part of the discussion of visitor use and user capacity). As noted in Chapter 6, the maximum number of 

day use visitors at one time in the river corridor would vary among the alternatives. However, the method 

for calculating the maximum number of day use visitors at one time would be the same under all the 

alternatives and is summarized below. 

In Segment 2 (Yosemite Valley) and Segment 7 (Wawona), visitor day use capacities would be determined 

through a combination of day-use parking spaces for visitors arriving in private vehicles, and by the capacity 

of regional transit and commercial tour buses. In Segment 3 (Merced Gorge) and Segment 4 (El Portal), 

visitor day use capacities would be determined through the number of day-use parking spaces for visitors 

arriving by private vehicles. In Segments 2, 3, 4, and 7, visitor day use capacities also include people in 

vehicles circulating on park roads. In-park shuttles would facilitate visitor circulation within the Merced 

River corridor, but would not affect the number of people who could be in the corridor, or a specific 

segment of the corridor, at one time. 

The only access to wild segments of the river corridor (Segments 1, 5, and 8) is via hiking trails, and the 

trailheads that provide access to these segments would remain located in Yosemite Valley (Segment 2) or 

Wawona (Segment 7). 

A summary of user capacities by alternative is provided in the overview section of the alternatives 

descriptions in this chapter. The actions related to visitor day use capacity that would be common to 

Alternatives 2-6 are described below, by segment. 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

The only access to this wild segment is via hiking trails, and the trailheads that provide access to this 

segment would remain located in Yosemite Valley (Segment 2). Transportation options for accessing the 

trailheads are included in the discussion of day use capacity for Yosemite Valley, below. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-82 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

The day use capacity of Segment 2 would differ under the alternatives, depending on the amount of 

available day parking, but also some differences in regional transit service. Action related to visitor day-use 

parking under Alternatives 2-6 would include: 

 Retain a total 15 day parking spaces for commercial tour buses near Yosemite Lodge, 

accommodating up to 720 people at one time in Yosemite Valley. 

 Remediate the soils at the Wilderness parking lot, which was once a landfill for Curry Village and 

formalize parking with 190 spaces. 

 Remove roadside parking from areas where parking does resource damage or is in conflict with 

ORVs. Specifically this includes 40 spaces along Cook’s Meadow, 58 spaces along Sentinel Drive, 

12 spaces along Village Drive, 20 spaces near Northside drive and the Curry 4-way, and 14 spaces 

between Big Oak Flat Road/El Portal Road intersection and El Portal Bridge. 

 Redesign and formalize the existing parking lot at The Ahwahnee, providing for proper drainage. 

Construct an additional 50 parking space lot to the east of the existing parking lot. The parking lot 

at The Ahwahnee would be designed to accommodate the 50 spaces lost after a rock fall in 2009. 

Under Alternatives 2-6, an East Yosemite Valley day-use parking permit system could be instituted 

whenever conditions reached the point where day use demand frequently exceeded available day parking 

for a particular alternative. Because day parking would be reduced under Alternatives 2-4, a day-use 

reservation system would need to be implemented immediately under these alternatives. Under Alternative 

5 or 6, an East Yosemite Valley day-use parking permit system would be implemented whenever visitation 

to the East Yosemite Valley exceeded the parking availability and caused formal traffic diversions to be 

instituted at the El Capitan Crossover for 14 or more days during the summer season for two consecutive 

years (see Chapter 6). If implemented, the day-use parking permit system would require follow-on planning 

and environmental compliance, taking into account all of the following factors: 

 Seasonality – The permit system would be instituted during the peak use summer season and 

during daylight hours only. 

 Allocation – The system would ensure fair and equitable allocation of permits to all visitors on a 

mixed first-come, first-served and advanced reservation basis. 

 Distribution – Permits would be available by multiple means including internet, telephone and inperson. 

 Permit Compliance – Permits might be checked at either park entrance stations and/or on-site at 

day-use parking areas in the Valley. 

 Costs and Fees – The permit system would need to address the costs of administration and 

whether fees would be required. 

 Thru Traffic and other Considerations – The permit system would need to take into account the 

various types of day users to Yosemite Valley including administrative traffic, pass-thru travelers, 

special events and groups, etc. Similarly, development of the permit system would also need to 

account for the economic impacts (both positive and negative) to gateway communities. 

Public transit options common to Alternatives 2-6 include: 

 New public transit service between Fresno and Yosemite Valley would be established across the 

alternatives. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-83 

 Under Alternatives 2-6, the concession operated in-park shuttle services in Yosemite Valley and 

from Wawona to Yosemite Valley would remain. Additionally, a formal shuttle bus stop at El 

Capitan Meadow would be constructed in all alternatives and access to meadows would be 

formalized to address informal trail impacts. 

Segment 3: Merced Gorge 

The day-use parking capacity in this alternative would continue to total 180 spaces at various roadside pullout locations. This parking capacity would be consistent across Alternatives 2-6 and would accommodate 

up to 869 people at one time. No visitors would be delivered to this segment via public transit. This river 

segment is considered a “pass through” segment and therefore it would not contain any stops for passengers 

to enter or depart from transit services traveling through this corridor under Alternatives 2-6. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

The visitor day-use parking capacity in El Portal would vary among the alternatives. However, because most 

visitors parking in the day parking spaces at El Portal would be expected to take shuttles into the park, 

under alternatives that increase visitor day-use parking in El Portal (Alternatives 4, 5, and 6), those visitors 

are counted as part of the day use calculations for Yosemite Valley and not for El Portal. 

Segment 5: South Fork Merced above Wawona 

The only access to this wild segment is via hiking trails, and the trailheads that provide access to this 

segment would remain located in Wawona (Segment 7). Transportation options for accessing the trailheads 

are included in the discussion of day use capacity for Wawona, below. 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

The day parking capacity would remain 290 spaces across all actions alternatives, accommodating up to 911 

people at one time. Roadside parking between the store and Chilnualna Falls Road would be removed 

across all action alternatives. Tour bus parking spaces would continue to be provided for eight buses 

accommodating up to 384 people at one time. The number of people arriving via regional transit would vary 

by alternative (from a low of 26 to a maximum of 311 people at one time). 

Segment 8: South Fork Merced below Wawona 

The only access to this wild segment is via hiking trails, and the trailheads that provide access to this 

segment would remain located in Wawona (Segment 7). Transportation options for accessing the trailheads 

are included in the discussion of day use capacity for Wawona, below. 

Administrative Activities 

Administrative functions and facilities would generally be retained in their current locations under 

Alternatives 2-6, with some changes in housing capacity and office space allocations. All such activity would 

remain within the overall management and oversight of the NPS. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-84 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

Administrative uses in this segment would consist primarily of ranger patrols and backcountry utility work. 

These activities are seasonal in nature and minimal in comparison to visitor use and would not affect the 

overall user capacity. 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Administrative uses would remain prevalent in this segment. No changes in NPS administrative facilities 

would be proposed under any alternative. The following changes in concessioner administrative facilities 

would be included in Alternatives 2-6. 

 Remove the Concessioner Garage from the 100-year 

floodplain and relocate the NPS garage function to the 

historic Government Utility Building in the NPS Government 

Utility Area, which is outside the river corridor. Repair and 

towing services for the public that previously operated from 

the garage would be available in El Portal. 

 Remove the Concessioner General Office Building and 

relocate the function to the Concessioner Warehouse 

Building (which would be expanded in Alternative 6). 

 Visitor-use management program would ensure access for 

traditionally associated American Indians for participation in 

annually scheduled traditional and cultural events. 

Segment 3: Merced Gorge 

Only administrative use associated with the Arch Rock Entrance Station occurs in this segment. The 

associated residential use is described below. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

Administrative uses would remain prevalent in this segment under Alternatives 2-6. This would include all 

administrative uses associated with the NPS Maintenance Facility. Existing uses would remain in their 

existing locations with the following exception: 

 Remove the Odger’s Bulk Petroleum Storage from its current location to facilitate valley oak habitat 

restoration; relocate this facility outside the river corridor. 

 In consultation with traditionally associated American Indian tribes and groups, determine the best 

method for removing the aboveground abandoned infrastructure associated with CA-MRP-0181.

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

The NPS maintenance and administrative building complex within Segment 7 would be redesigned and 

improved under all the action alternatives, as follows: 

 Construct a 4,500 square foot building and grounds maintenance facility, a 6,800 square foot 

combined structural and wildland fire station, and a 4,000 square foot roads maintenance facility to 

provide facilities to optimize operational efficiency. 

 Rehabilitate the existing California Conservation Corp structures for potential reuse. 

Conceptual site drawings have 

been completed for the 

relocation of the garage and the 

Concessioner General Office 

Building, to allow the analysis of 

impacts of these potential 

projects. See “Conceptual Site 

Drawings” at the end of the 

Actions Common to 

Alternatives 2-6 discussion for 

site details and design 

drawings. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-85 

 Remove staged materials, abandoned utilities, vehicles, and parking lot from the riparian buffer at 

the Wawona Maintenance Yard and restore native ecosystem. Provide a 150-foot wide restoration 

buffer. 

Coordination with Traditionally Associated American Indian Tribes and Groups 

The National Park Service would coordinate with traditionally associated American Indian tribes and 

groups to protect ethnographic resources: 

 Implement best management practices to ensure continued coordination between traditionally 

associated American Indian tribes, groups, and traditional practitioners (through the Park 

American Indian Liaison) with law enforcement, fire management, interpretation, invasive species 

management, ecological restoration, and facilities management programs; include operational 

guidelines for material staging areas, parking, etc., to protect ethnographic resources. 

 Assure access for traditionally associated American Indians for participation in annually scheduled 

traditional cultural events. In addition, assure tribal access for the personal conduct of traditional 

cultural practices through the Yosemite tribal fee waiver pass program. 

Employee Housing and Employee Parking 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

The Merced Lake Ranger station and the Little Yosemite Valley trail crew and ranger camp would remain as 

temporary housing for employees working in this area. Rangers are stationed in this segment for 4-8 days at 

a time and these seasonal camps would continue to be used under all alternatives. There would be no 

permanent housing in this segment under any alternative.

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

The existing employee housing for 164 NPS required occupants would be retained under Alternatives 2-6. 

Under Alternatives 2-6 the temporary concessioner employee housing would be removed; the total housing 

provided for concessioner employees would differ among the alternatives, based on the visitor experience 

to be provided and the commercial services needed to support that experience. Under Alternatives 2-6, the 

following temporary concessioner employee housing would be removed: 

 Curry Village: Remove temporary housing at Boys Town and Huff House housing. 

 Yosemite Village: Remove Lost Arrow temporary housing 

 Ahwahnee Hotel: Remove Ahwahnee tents 

 Yosemite Lodge: Remove Thousand Cabins and Highland Court. 

Under all alternatives, parking for administrative functions would be provided within the land assignments 

for these uses (adjacent to administrative buildings), where it would not compete with visitor parking spaces 

or conflict with visitor circulation patterns. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-86 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 3: Merced Gorge 

The residential unit at the Arch Rock would continue to house up to 9 NPS employees under Alternatives 2-6. 

Minimal designated parking would continue to be available for exclusive employee and administrative use 

in this area and would not compete with visitor parking and access. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

Additional employee housing would be developed in El Portal for concessioner employees under 

Alternatives 2-6. The amount and type of housing (high density vs. single-family homes) would differ among 

the alternatives. The following actions would be common to all the alternatives: 

 Add infill units (duplexes) to the El Portal Village Center to accommodate up to 12 employees. 

 Remove or relocate 36 existing private residences in the Abbieville/Trailer Village area to 

accommodate restoration and housing actions. The former footprints that are within the 150-foot 

riparian buffer would be ecologically restored. All new housing re-development would be outside 

the 100-year floodplain. Other redevelopment would be outside of the 150-foot riparian buffer. 

Segment 5: Wilderness above Wawona 

No employee housing would be provided in this segment. 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment 

The existing NPS and concessioner employee housing in the Wawona community and elsewhere outside 

the river corridor would be retained. 

Segment 8: South Fork below Wawona 

No employee housing would be provided in this segment. 

Analysis of Facilities and Services 

Table 8-11 presents the park’s assessment of the particular facilities and services that would be needed to 

support public use and/or to protect river resources based on the types, levels, and locations of use 

proposed across all the action alternatives. As an example, wayfinding to the Yosemite Village area from the 

primary parking area would be improved by removing and relocating both the Concession General Office 

building and the Yosemite Village Garage (shuttle and fleet maintenance facility) to a location outside the 

river corridor in Yosemite Valley. Additionally, an overall reduction in commercial services would occur 

across all alternatives, with services such as bike rentals, the Curry Village ice rink, and commercial 

horseback day rides eliminated. Additionally, existing development within 100 feet of the river are removed 

such as campsites in North Pines, Lower Pines, and Backpacker’s Campgrounds as well as units within the 

ordinary high water mark at Housekeeping Camp. Finally, all temporary employee housing at Curry Village 

and the Yosemite Lodge would be removed. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-87 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds 

Curry Pavilion and Food Service Retained 

Yes: This food service facility is necessary to support day visitors and those overnight visitors who are staying at lodging facilities without kitchenettes. 

No. Food services are components of the overnight guest accommodations at this location. They are required to be located very near the overnight sleeping units. 

Curry Village Grocery Store Retained 

Yes: This grocery provides visitors (as well as park residents) a limited 

range of merchandise including packaged and fresh groceries, sundries, and outdoor products that are frequently needed by campers and hikers, and day and overnight visitors. 

No. Groceries are a component of overnight accommodations and need to be provided proximate to sleeping units 

Curry Village Pizza Deck & Bar Retained 

Yes: Food services are necessary to support day visitors and those overnight visitors who are staying in lodging facilities without kitchenettes. The Curry Village Pizza Deck and Bar serve casual dining lunch and dinner to lodging guests and many other visitors to Yosemite 

Valley. 

No. Food services are components of the overnight guest accommodations at this location. They are required to be located very near the overnight sleeping units. 

Curry Village Ice Rink Service eliminated / facility removed No: The ice rink at Curry Village, which has offered seasonal commercial ice skate rental and recreation in an outdoor setting within a closed loop ice creation facility, is not a vital visitor experience. N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

Commercial Horseback Day 

Rides in Yosemite Valley Service eliminated 

No: To date, the stable operations in Yosemite Valley provides seasonal commercial guided equestrian services for recreational use. This facility 

and service also supports the High Sierra Camp operations. 

N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

Curry Village Bike Rental Service eliminated / facility removed No: The bike rental operation at Curry Village is not a vital visitor service. N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

The Ahwahnee Rooms and 

Cottages Retained 

Yes: This National Historic Landmark is a significant contributing element of the Valley Historic ORV that cannot feasibly be relocated outside the corridor. Its retention in the river corridor is integral to protecting the historic ORV in this segment. 

No. The Ahwahnee hotel is a National Historic Landmark within a historic district. It is not feasible to consider moving the hotel structure or the cottages in their entirety. 

The Ahwahnee Bar & Food 

Service Retained Yes: This food service facility is necessary to support day visitors and those overnight visitors who are staying in the hotel. 

No. Food services are a key component of the hotel. The existing bar, dining room and kitchen are located within the interior of the main hotel building and are not feasible to remove or relocate 

The Ahwahnee Dining Room Retained Yes: This food service facility is necessary to support day visitors and those overnight visitors who are staying in the hotel. 

No. Food services are a key component of the hotel. The existing bar, dining room and kitchen are located within the interior of the main hotel building and are not feasible to remove or relocate. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-88 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds (cont.) 

The Ahwahnee Gift Shop Retained 

Yes: Located within the interior of the NHL, the gift shop offers a variety of gifts and souvenirs, consistent with the gift shop mission statement and the visitor experience goals of this alternative. 

No. The Ahwahnee hotel gift shop is located within the interior of the hotel. It is not practical to consider moving it to an alternative location. 

The Ahwahnee Sweet Shop Retained 

Yes: Located within the interior of the NHL, the gift shop offers a variety of gifts and souvenirs, consistent with the gift shop mission statement and the visitor experience goals of this alternative. 

No. The Ahwahnee hotel Sweet Shop retail service is located within the interior of the hotel. It is not practical to consider moving it to an alternative location. 

 The Ahwahnee Swimming Pool Removed 

No: The hotel swimming pool is not integral to the Historic ORV or to the integrity of the hotel’s National Historic Landmark Status. (Please confirm) 

No. The Ahwahnee hotel swimming pool is a feature of the hotel. 

The Ahwahnee Tennis Court Removed No: These are currently obsolete and have not been maintained since 2005. N/A: This facility will be removed 

The Ahwahnee Parking Lot Retained Yes: This parking lot is immediately outside the Ahwahnee hotel and is utilized by hotel guests. 

No. This parking lot serves hotel guests. It would not be feasible to remove the parking lot near the hotel to an alternative outside the river corridor. 

Boys Town Employee Housing 

Area 

Re-located (to Huff 

House area) 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance ORVs. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Huff House Employee Housing 

Area 

Re-developed (with 

high-density 

housing) 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who 

provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance ORVs. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Ahwahnee Employee Dormitory Retained 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Curry Village Employee 

Residence Area 

Retained and 

reduced. Targeted 

removal of buildings 

in rock-fall zone will 

take place prior to 

MRP 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance ORVs. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-89 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds (cont.) 

Happy Isles Nature Center Retained 

Yes: Serves as the primary interpretation & education center for visitors to east Yosemite Valley and the John Muir / Mist Trail. This facility is used by Nature Bridge as a winter classroom. Classroom activities revolve around the river water quality. 

Yes. The services provided from this facility could be provided from an alternative outside of the river corridor if a suitable alternative location is identified. However, the river resource is currently an important component of activities taking place at this location. 

Happy Isles Snack Stand Removed 

No: This facility, a mobile food service cart that provides limited food and beverages to visitors hiking the Vernal-Nevada Fall corridor, is not a vital visitor service. 

No. There are not suitable locations for this service to be relocated to because the purpose is proximity to the Mist Trail, one of these most popular day hikes in Yosemite Valley and numerous visitors are underprepared in terms of hydration. 

Le Conte Memorial Lodge Retained 

Yes: This National Historic Landmark building is used by the Sierra Club 

for visitor interpretive and education programs. It is a significant contributing element of the Valley Historic ORV that cannot feasibly be relocated outside the corridor. Its retention in its historic location is integral to protecting the historic ORV in this segment. 

No: The Le Conte Memorial Lodge is a National Historic Landmark that would not be feasible to relocate outside the river corridor. The services offered at this location could be relocated should an alternative site be identified. 

Happy Isles Loop Road Retained 

Yes: This road is consistent with a recreational classification and is needed to support public use of the river corridor. It is a component of the primary transportation & circulation road system that connects all major visitor service nodes. The bridge is also use by NPS for law enforcement and fire protection. 

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway from its present location 

Clark's Bridge Retained 

Yes: This vehicle/pedestrian/ bicycle bridge is consistent with a recreational classification and is needed to support public use of the river corridor. It allows for safe crossing of the Merced River and access to campgrounds and other points of interest in the east end of Yosemite Valley. Pedestrian and bicycle bridges protect riparian habitat from destruction caused by random crossings throughout the river corridor. The bridge is also use by NPS for law enforcement and fire protection. 

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location given the circulation system for Yosemite Valley. 

Happy Isles Road Bridge Retained 

Yes: This vehicle/pedestrian/ bicycle bridge is consistent with a recreational classification and is needed to support public use of the river 

corridor. It allows for safe crossing of the Merced River and access to the John Muir Trailhead and the Mist Trail, and is part of the Yosemite Valley Loop Trail. The bridge supports the east Yosemite Valley shuttle bus route to Happy Isles and Mirror Lake and used by NPS for law enforcement and fire protection. 

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location 

West of Backpackers 

Campground (New) New Construction 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight accommodations that 

allow visitors to have a direct outdoor experience. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-90 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Yosemite Village and Housekeeping Camp 

Housekeeping Camp Bridge Retained 

Yes: Vehicle/pedestrian/ bicycle bridges are needed to support public use of the river corridor. They allow safe crossing of the Merced River and access to campgrounds and other points of interest in the east end of Yosemite Valley. Pedestrian and bicycle bridges also protect riparian habitat from destruction caused by random crossings throughout the river corridor. 

No. This bridge could not be relocated outside the river corridor as it is a bridge across the Merced River. The bridge could be removed and foot traffic redirected to Stoneman and/or Sentinel bridges. 

Concessioner General Office 

Facility Removed 

and Service Relocated to 

Concessioner 

Maintenance and 

Warehouse Building, 

which is outside the 

river corridor 

Yes: It is essential that most of the administrative, managerial and 

logistical support functions located in this facility remain centrally located in Yosemite Valley. As such there are adequate facilities outside of the river corridor that could, with interior modification, absorb these functions. 

Yes. The services currently being performed in this facility could be relocated to alternate locations outside the river corridor. 

Concessioner Garage 

Facility Removed 

and Service Relocated to 

Government Utility 

Building, which is 

outside the river 

corridor 

Yes: The concession operated garage is a critical component of the park 

operation. Services offered at the garage include: public automotive repairs; maintenance of park shuttle fleet(s); maintenance of the concession fleet; sales of automotive accessories (including snow chains); and dispatching of tow trucks. The park shuttle fleets are dispatched from a central office located at the garage. 

Yes. It could be feasible to relocate some of the services provided at the existing garage to locations outside the river corridor, including shuttle fleet maintenance, public automotive repairs and concessioner fleet maintenance. Relocation of shuttle maintenance and public automotive repairs would be contingent upon identifying a suitable location outside the river corridor, but near primary visitor services to meet the operational needs of the shuttle service as well as visitors who may be without transportation while their vehicles are being repaired. 

Concessioner Fire Station Retained Yes: Fire support services and apparatus are essential to provide for public health and safety and resource protection. 

No. The concessioner fire station could not be relocated to an alternative location as its proximity to visitor services is inherent in its current siting. 

Village Store Retained 

Yes: This grocery and retail facility is needed to support day use visitors, 

park residents and overnight visitors. It offers a limited range of merchandise including packaged and fresh groceries, sundries, and outdoor products frequently needed by campers and hikers. 

No. The services offered at the Village Store could be not relocated outside the river corridor if a suitable location 

Village Grill Retained 

Yes: This food service facility is necessary to support day visitors and those overnight visitors who are staying at lodging facilities without kitchenettes. The Village Grill serves a menu that is quickly prepared and modestly priced, and is convenient for visitors to Yosemite Village. 

Yes. The services offered at the Village Grill could be relocated outside the river corridor if a suitable alternative location in Yosemite Village is identified. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-91 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Yosemite Village and Housekeeping Camp (cont.) 

Village Sports Shop 

Service eliminated 

and facility repurposed 

No: This service is a retail outlet that includes sales of recreational equipment, outdoor clothing, books and maps that pertain to park resources and activities, is not a vital visitor service. 

N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

Village Store Parking Lot Expanded 

Yes: A visitor parking area in this location is vital because it is proximate 

to the main visitor services core in Yosemite Valley, including major destinations like the Yosemite Valley Visitor Center, Wilderness Center, 

the Museum, Ansel Adams Gallery, and Degnan’s Deli. 

No. Parking facilities must be proximate to the Yosemite Village area. 

Art Activity Center / 

Bank Building Removed 

No: This building, originally constructed to house the former branch 

office of the Wells Fargo Bank, now serves three purposes: (1) Yosemite 

Conservancy Art Activity Center, a visitor education opportunity, (2) cash 

operations for the primary concessioner, and (3) site of the Valley First Credit Union automated teller machine that serves local resident banking needs as well as dispensing cash to visitors who use debit and credit cards. 

N/A: This facility will be removed and the services will be co-located within existing buildings. 

Yosemite Valley Chapel Retained 

Yes: This is a historic structure that has been used as a place of nondenominational worship, and life events such as memorial services and 

wedding ceremonies in Yosemite Valley for many decades. 

No. The Yosemite Valley Chapel is a historic structure located in its original site. 

Relocation would diminish its historic integrity to the degree that it would no longer meet the criteria for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. 

Sentinel Crossover Retained 

Yes: This road is consistent with a recreational classification and is 

needed to support public use of the river corridor. It is a component of the primary transportation & circulation road system that connects all major visitor service nodes. 

No. This roadway segment services as a vital linkage between Northside and Southside Drives. Sentinel Bridge was constructed in 1990 to align with this roadway segment. 

Segment 2: Yosemite Lodge and Camp 4 Area 

Camp 4 Campground Retained 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight accommodations that allow visitors to have a direct outdoor experience. 

No. Camp 4 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and must remain in its current location to maintain its historic integrity. 

Yosemite Lodge Swimming Pool 

and Snack Stand Removed 

No: The Yosemite Lodge pool has been operated as a public pool, open to Lodge guests as well as other patrons, including park employees and their dependents. The snack stand serves a very limited menu of quick serve refreshments. The pool and snack stand are not considered a vital visitor or community service. 

No. These facilities are for Lodge guests and it would not be practical to relocate outside the river corridor. 

Yosemite Lodge Nature Shop 

Service eliminated 

and facility repurposed as noncommercial use No: This facility is a retail outlet that offers visitors a selection of nature themed gifts and souvenirs. It is not essential to support public use of the river corridor. No. The building currently housing the Nature Shop is part of the Yosemite Lodge food service structure and would be infeasible to relocate. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-92 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Yosemite Lodge and Camp 4 Area (cont.) 

Yosemite Lodge 

Housekeeping/Maintenance 

Relocated within the 

Lodge Complex 

Yes: The Yosemite Lodge housekeeping and maintenance facility serves as the property-specific worksite from which visitor services, including daily room cleaning and maintenance operations for the entire complex, include food service and multi-purpose spaces (such as the Garden Terrace and the Cliff Room) are based. All lodging properties require some "back of the house" location for storage and staging. 

Yes. The existing housekeeping and maintenance facilities could be relocated to an alternative location within the Yosemite Lodge complex 

Yosemite Lodge Food Court Retained 

Yes: Food services are necessary to support day visitors and those overnight visitors who are staying in lodging facilities without kitchenettes. The Yosemite Lodge Food Court is a high volume guest service available to Yosemite Lodge patrons, as well as day visitors and 

overnight users. 

No. The building currently housing the Food Court is part of the Yosemite Lodge food service structure and would be infeasible to relocate. 

 Yosemite Lodge Post Office Removed 

No: This post office has operated as a satellite of the main Yosemite Post Office. (Note: prior to the 1997 flood, this post office served the employees who resided near Yosemite Lodge. Much of that housing has been removed from the area). This facility is no longer necessary. 

No. This post office is no longer needed to serve visitors or employees in this area. 

Yosemite Lodge Bike Stand Service eliminated / facility removed No: To date, the bike rental operation at the Yosemite Lodge offers seasonal commercial bicycle and accessibility device rental for unguided visitor recreation. This service is not a vital visitor service. N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

NPS Volunteer Office 

Facility removed and 

service relocated 

outside the river 

corridor 

Yes: Worksite assigned to NPS staff who manage the NPS volunteer program who play a vital role in various resource protection projects annually. 

Yes. The administrative program managed from this facility y could be relocated to a site outside the river corridor. 

Swinging Bridge Retained 

Yes: This pedestrian foot bridge is consistent with a recreational classification and is needed to support public use of the river corridor. It allows for safe crossing of the Merced River and access to points of interest in Yosemite Valley. Pedestrian bridges protect riparian habitat from destruction caused by random crossings throughout the river corridor. 

No. Swinging Bridge is part of the Valley pedestrian/bicycle corridor that provides access to important visitor destinations. 

Superintendent's Footbridge Retained 

Yes: This pedestrian foot bridge is consistent with a recreational 

classification and is needed to support public use of the river corridor. It allows for safe crossing of the Merced River access to points of interest in Yosemite Valley. Pedestrian bridges protect riparian habitat from 

destruction caused by random crossings throughout the river corridor. 

No. Under the current pedestrian and bicycle circulation system in Yosemite Valley, this bridge connects two segments of the bicycle path and provides a pedestrian link between Northside Drive and the chapel area. 

Yosemite Lodge Parking Area 

(New) New construction 

Yes: Will serve as a visitor parking and queuing area during times of peak visitation to assist with reducing vehicle congestion on roadways. The parking area replaces approximately 35 roadside parking spaces 

adjacent to Cook’s Meadow. It also is the primary tour bus parking for 

Yosemite Valley. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (i.e., proximity to Yosemite Falls trailhead, Wahoga, Camp 4 and the Yosemite Lodge) could accommodate this parking area.
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-93 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Yosemite Lodge and Camp 4 Area (cont.) 

East of Camp 4 Campground 

(New) New construction 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds provide overnight accommodations that allow visitors to have a direct outdoor experience. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (i.e., proximity to Camp 4 and the Yosemite Lodge) could accommodate this campground.

Segment 2: West Yosemite Valley 

El Capitan Cross-over Retained 

Yes: This road is consistent with a recreational classification and is 

needed to support public use of the river corridor. It is a component of the primary transportation & circulation road system that provides a vital west Valley river crossing. 

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location 

El Capitan Cross-over Bridge Retained 

Yes: This vehicle/pedestrian/ bicycle bridge is consistent with a recreational classification and is needed to support public use of the river corridor. It provides a vital west Valley river crossing. The bridge supports the west Yosemite Valley shuttle bus route to El Capitan 

Meadow and used by NPS for law enforcement and fire protection. 

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location 

Pohono Bridge Retained 

Yes: This vehicle/pedestrian/ bicycle bridge is consistent with a recreational classification and is needed to support public use of the river corridor. It allows for safe crossing of the Merced River and access to the John Muir Trailhead and the Mist Trail, and is part of the Yosemite Valley Loop Trail. The bridge supports the east Yosemite Valley shuttle bus route to Happy Isles and Mirror Lake and used by NPS for law enforcement and fire protection. 

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location 

Segment 2: Utilities Across All of Segment 2 

 Utility Infrastructure Retained 

Yes: Consistent with a recreational classification. Water, wastewater, electrical and telecommunication systems provide necessary infrastructure to protect water quality, park resources, and human health & safety. 

No. Utility systems serving facilities that will remain within the river corridor could not be relocated. If facilities within the river corridor are relocated, their utility system components could be removed. 

Segment 3: The Gorge 

Arch Rock Entrance Station 

Kiosk Retained 

Yes: This facility serves as one of the five entry points to Yosemite National Park. It is necessary to have Park staff working at this facility to 

collect entrance fees and provide visitors with information. 

No. The entrance station facility must be located along the El Portal Road in an area with sufficient sight distance for motorists traveling to and from Yosemite Valley to make safe stops to transact fee payments with park staff. 

Arch Rock Housing (2 duplexes) Retained 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs. 

Yes. These workforce housing units could be relocated if satisfactory substitute housing is made available. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-94 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 3: The Gorge (cont.) 

Arch Rock VUA Office Retained Yes: This administrative space provides vital safe operational space for employees who work at the Arch Rock Entrance Station. No. This administrative space must be collocated with the entrance station.

Utility Infrastructure Retained 

Yes: Consistent with a scenic classification. Water, wastewater, electrical and telecommunication systems provide necessary infrastructure to protect water quality, park resources, and human health & safety. 

No. Utility systems serving facilities that will remain within the river corridor could not be relocated. If facilities within the river corridor are relocated, their utility system components could be removed.

Segment 4: El Portal 

El Portal Administrative Complex Retained 

Yes: This facility houses wastewater treatment processing, large vehicle maintenance and fleet storage, shops for all maintenance operations; a central distribution point for supply, commissary, and warehouse operations, the park's emergency communications center and fire cache operation; and training, office, and critical administrative operations space for park operations. This facility is essential to support public use of the river corridor, public health and safety, and resource protection. 

No. This facility houses key operational functions that could not be relocated unless a suitable alternative site is identified. 

Rancheria Employee Housing 

Area (Existing) Retained 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs, and to accommodate employees who provide resource protection services consistent with the mission of the National Park Service and current agency management policies. 

No. This workforce housing could not be relocated unless a suitable alternative site is identified. 

Old El Portal Employee Housing 

Area (Existing) Retained 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs, and to accommodate employees who provide resource protection services consistent with the mission of the National Park Service and current agency management policies. 

No. This workforce housing could not be relocated unless a suitable alternative site is identified. 

Old El Portal Employee Housing 

Area (New) Constructed 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs, and to accommodate employees who provide resource protection services consistent with the mission of the National Park Service and current agency management policies.

No. In-fill employee housing should occur within existing employee housing areas

El Portal Market and Gas Station 

Complex Retained Yes: Due to the concentration and number of employees living in El Portal, this is considered a vital community service. 

No. These two concession operated services must be located along State Route 140. The service station requires considerable underground fuel distribution equipment that would be infeasible to relocate. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-95 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 4: El Portal (cont.) 

Murchison House Retained 

Yes: This structure has been closed for many years pending an extensive renovation. However, it was most recently used as a park office facility. 

No. This is a significant historic structure in El Portal and would lose its historic integrity if removed from this location.

El Portal Post Office Retained Yes: Due to the concentration and number of employees living in El Portal, this is considered a vital community service. 

No: No suitable lands in size or proximity exist outside the river corridor. This service is a functional requirement for the number of employees living in this location. 

El Portal Elementary School / 

High School Retained Yes: Due to the concentration and number of employees living in El Portal, this is considered a vital community service. 

No: No suitable lands in size or proximity exist outside the river corridor. This service is a functional requirement for the number of employees living in this location. 

NPS Offices in Old El Portal Retained 

Yes: This facility provides vital administrative space for park operations which support public use and resource protection efforts in the river corridor.

No: No suitable lands exist outside the river corridor, however, co-locating within the NPS maintenance complex would be desirable. 

NatureBridge Office / Employee 

Housing Building Retained 

Yes: NatureBridge hosts multi-day environmental education programs in 

Yosemite for school children. This facility provides necessary employee housing and administrative space for this park partner organization. 

No: This facility houses key operational functions, and workforce housing that could not be relocated unless a suitable alternative site is identified. 

Carroll Clark Community Hall Retained Yes: Due to the concentration and number of employees living in El Portal, this is considered a vital community service. 

No: No suitable lands in size or proximity exist outside the river corridor. This service is a functional requirement for the number of employees living in this location. 

Mariposa County Pool at 

Rancheria Flat Retained Yes: Due to the concentration and number of employees living in El Portal, this is considered a vital community service. 

No: No suitable lands in size or proximity exist outside the river corridor. This service is a functional requirement for the number of employees living in this location. 

 El Portal Fire Station Retained Yes: Fire support services and apparatus are essential to provide for public health and safety and resource protection. 

No: No suitable lands in size or proximity exist outside the river corridor. This service is a functional requirement for the number of employees living in this location. 

Motor Inn Cabins Retained 

Yes: Employees provide visitor services that are consistent with the 

types and amounts of use that are protective of ORV. These employees must live proximate to their work site. 

No. This facility houses key operational functions that could not be relocated unless a suitable alternative site is identified. 

AT&T Building Retained 

Yes: Serves as central distribution point for telecommunications network in El Portal. This telecommunication facility is necessary to support NPS’s management and administration of the river corridor. This facility is also required for the transmission of microwave signals. 

No: Due to transmission and receiving requirements of the system. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-96 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 4: El Portal (cont.) 

Odger’s Fuel Storage Facility Removed 

Yes: Provides bulk fuel storage vital to park operations serving utility infrastructure, back-up generators and heating / cooling systems for numerous visitor services.

Yes: Either a suitable location within park lands will be identified or a determination will be made that the service can be obtained outside the park. 

Old Wastewater Treatment Plant Removed 

No: This facility has been obsolete for decades. A plan of action to remove abandoned infrastructure will be developed with American Indian groups. 

No. A plan of action to address the abandoned infrastructure will develop in consultation with American Indian groups. 

Utility Infrastructure Retained 

Yes: Consistent with a recreational classification. Water, wastewater, electrical and telecommunication systems provide necessary infrastructure to protect water quality, park resources, and human health & safety. 

No. Utility systems serving facilities that will remain within the river corridor could not be relocated. If facilities within the river corridor are relocated, their utility system components could be removed. 

Segment 5 (Wild), Segments 6 & 7 (Recreational), Segment 8 (Wild) 

Wawona Hotel Lodging Units Retained 

Yes: This National Historic Landmark is a significant contributing 

element of the Wawona Historic ORV that cannot feasibly be relocated outside the corridor. Its retention in the river corridor is integral to protecting the historic ORV in this segment. 

No. The Wawona Hotel and its surrounding buildings, lawn, swimming tank, golf course are listed on the National Register of Historic Place. Their locations are integral to their historic significance that would be diminished by any relocation outside the river corridor. 

Wawona Hotel Restaurant Retained 

Yes: The restaurant is located inside the Wawona Hotel which is a National Historic Landmark. Food services are a necessary to support 

hotel guests. The nearest food services outside Wawona are located in Yosemite Valley, Fishcamp and Oakhurst. 

No. The Wawona Hotel and its surrounding buildings, lawn, swimming tank, golf course are listed on the National Register of Historic Place. Their locations are integral to their historic significance that would be diminished by any relocation outside the river corridor. 

Hill Studio Interpretation and 

Retail Retained 

Yes: The Hill Studio is a National Historic Landmark. It cannot feasibly 

be moved outside the river corridor and its retention in the river corridor is integral to protecting the historic ORV in this segment. It functions as a 

visitor contact station and sales outlet for the Yosemite Conservancy. 

No. Hill Studio is listed on the National 

Register of Historic Place. Its location is integral to their historic significance that would be diminished by any relocation outside the river corridor. 

Wawona Hotel Swimming Pool Retained 

Yes: The Wawona Hotel pool is open to hotel guests during peak 

periods only when weather conditions are favorable and reduces the number of people swimming in the river. 

No. The Wawona Hotel and its surrounding buildings, lawn, swimming tank, golf course are listed on the National Register of Historic Place. Their locations are integral to their historic significance that would be diminished by any relocation outside the river corridor 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-97 

TABLE 8-11. NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES – COMMON TO ALTERNATIVES 2-6 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 5 (Wild), Segments 6 & 7 (Recreational), Segment 8 (Wild) (cont.) 

Wawona Maintenance Yard 

Complex 

Retained and redeveloped 

Yes: This facility provides large vehicle and fleet storage, indoor, outdoor and shop spaces for necessary maintenance operations; fire, law 

enforcement, entrance station, campground reservation, and the wilderness operation administrative office space. The facility houses critically important park operation functions the absence of which would undermine NPS’s ability to support public use of the river corridor, public health and safety, and resource protection. 

No. This facility houses key operational functions that could not be relocated unless a suitable alternative site is identified.

Wawona Wastewater Treatment 

Plant Retained 

Yes: This facility provides wastewater treatment processing and water 

distribution monitoring. This facility is critically needed to support public 

use of the river corridor, public health and safety, and resource protection (by preventing discharge of untreated water into the Merced River). 

No. This facility houses key operational functions that could not be relocated unless a suitable alternative site is identified.

Wawona Gas Station Retained 

Yes: Serves visitors and local residents. Provides vehicle fuel, limited 

automotive services such as tire repair, and snow chain sales/installation. The concessioner currently operates a tow truck from this site. This garage provides necessary support services to park employees and private citizens who own property within the river corridor in Wawona. 

Yes. This facility could be relocated if a suitable alternative site is identified.

 Wawona Store Retained 

Yes: This store is needed to support visitors, park employees, and private in-holders. It offers a limited range of merchandise including packaged and fresh groceries, sundries, and outdoor products frequently needed by campers, hikers and residents. 

Yes. This facility could be relocated if a suitable alternative site is identified. 

Pioneer History Center (Wawona) Retained 

Yes: This facility contains interpretive displays, historic structures and equipment used in NPS’s living history programs. This facility interprets the history of the Wawona area for park visitors and thus supports public understanding of the history and resources in this portion of the river corridor. 

No. This facility houses key operational functions that could not be relocated unless a suitable alternative site is identified.

Wawona Store Parking Lot Retained Yes: This is a parking facility immediately outside the Wawona Store Yes. This facility could be relocated if a suitable alternative site is identified.

Utility Infrastructure Retained 

Yes: Water, wastewater, electrical and telecommunication systems provide necessary infrastructure to protect water quality, park resources, and human health & safety. 

No. Utility systems serving facilities that will remain within the river corridor could not be relocated. If facilities within the river corridor are relocated, their utility system components could be removed. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-98 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Conceptual Site Drawings 

Parking along El Portal Road from the Big Oak Flat Road to Pohono Bridge 

The 0.6 mile road segment of El Portal Road from the intersection of the Big Oak Flat Road to Pohono 

Bridge currently contains a number of non-delineated, dirt roadside pullouts. Five of the larger pullouts are 

located on the south side of the road immediately adjacent to the Merced River, while one is located on the 

north side of the road just west of the intersection with Northside Drive and Southside Drive. The use of 

these dirt pullouts and associated informal trails on the south side of the road is causing erosion and 

vegetation trampling of the riverbank in some locations. Common to all of the action alternatives, four of 

the pullouts on the south side of the road would be paved and formalized to provide parking for a limited 

number of vehicles. These pull-outs would be curbed to prevent further encroachment towards the river 

and would accommodate up to 20 total vehicles with the remaining roadside and riverbank soils would 

decompacted and restored to natural conditions. The largest pullout, located just east of the Big Oak Flat 

Road/El Portal Road intersection, would be removed and restored to natural conditions to avoid impacts to 

sensitive resources and to address safety concerns. The existing paved pullout on the north side of the road 

just west of the intersection with Northside/Southside Drive would also be formalized to accommodate 

6 vehicles for a total parking capacity of 26 vehicles along this section of road. Curbing would be installed 

along the remaining south side road shoulder to prevent vehicles from creating additional informal pullouts, 

causing further resource damage. Of the 13 existing drainage culverts along this segment of the road, two 

would be removed and the remainder either retained or reconstructed in a manner that is consistent with 

their historic character and function. 

NPS Government Utility Area

The NPS Government Utility Area, located just north of Yosemite Village, is the primary location for 

Yosemite Valley utilities, park operations and maintenance. It consists of a large operations building and 

smaller outbuildings, maintenance yard, administrative fueling station, NPS stables, law enforcement and 

search and rescue headquarters. Eleven of the buildings and sheds are contributing elements to the 

Yosemite Valley Historic District. In order to improve circulation at the complex and to provide parking 

spaces for larger vehicles, six of the non-historic outbuildings would be removed or relocated as NPS 

operations are further consolidated within existing facilities in El Portal and structures are removed from 

the rock fall hazard zone. However, Law Enforcement operations and Valley Utilities would remain in their 

existing locations within the Government Utility Area. The current function of the Concessioner Garage, 

which is located in the 100-year floodplain, would be relocated to the historic Government Utility Building 

within the complex. Services would consist of light maintenance and repair for shuttle busses, tour buses, 

and concessioner vehicles. A new roads and trails maintenance building would be built which would house 

essential winter park operations equipment such as snow removal and sand spreading vehicles and 

equipment. The new building would include four (4) vehicle bays with support functions. All anticipated 

development activities and improvements would occur within the existing disturbed 4.75 acre site. Repair 

and towing services for the public that previously operated from the Concessioner Garage would be 

available in El Portal. 
Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-99 

Concessioner General Office 

The existing 18,000 square foot Concessioner General Office building located in Yosemite Village, just 

south of the Village Store parking lot would be removed under all alternatives to allow redesign and 

expansion of visitor parking, improved traffic and pedestrian circulation and resource restoration. The park 

has developed two alternatives that would allow the concessioner to redevelop existing facilities, but would 

establish a limit of approximately 14,000 square feet of replacement facilities. This would reduce office 

space, and therefore housing needs for approximately 15 concession employees in the valley. 

Alternatives 2-5 

The office space would be replaced by reconfiguring the interior of the existing Concessioner Maintenance 

and Warehouse building located east of the NPS Government Utility Area. The existing structure would be 

updated to include office space on a mezzanine floor. In addition to this, nearby existing concessioner 

employee housing would be converted to office use. The residential needs of employees displaced from 

housing facilities would be accommodated in other buildings in Yosemite Valley. 

Additional parking spaces for vehicles associated with the existing and relocated maintenance and 

warehousing operations, administrative vehicles and private vehicles used by employees would be expanded 

near the facility to accommodate the increased occupancy of the remodeled worksite. Specific locations 

being considered for parking include formalizing approximately 17 spaces along Village Drive, 6 to the 

northeast of the warehouse building, approximately 16 along Boulder Lane, approximately 15 spaces along 

the north side of Tenaya Way and an additional 15 spaces north of the existing auditorium. Development of 

parking spaces behind the auditorium would require the removal of one existing employee residence. 

Alternative 6 

In Alternative 6, the office space would be replaced by reconfiguring the interior of the existing 

Concessioner Maintenance and Warehouse building located east of the NPS Government Utility Area. A 

4,000 square foot addition to this building would also be constructed. The expansion of the building would 

require the elimination of 10 to 12 parking spaces that would be replaced nearby along Village Drive. 

Additional parking spaces for vehicles associated with the existing and relocated maintenance and 

warehousing operations, administrative vehicles and private vehicles used by employees would be expanded 

near the facility to accommodate the increased occupancy of the remodeled worksite. Specific locations 

being considered for parking include formalizing approximately 17 spaces along Village Drive, 6 spaces to 

the northeast of the warehouse building, approximately 16 spaces along Boulder Lane, approximately 

15 spaces along the north side of Tenaya Way and an additional 15 spaces north of the existing auditorium. 

Development of parking spaces behind the auditorium would require the removal of one existing employee 

residence. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-100 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

This page intentionally left blank 

 
*These drawings are provided to demonstrate where facilities would be removed, relocated, or constructed according to actions more fully described by project alternatives. The drawings 

 do not represent a final proposal. More detailed design and construction documents would be developed consistent with the general concepts presented here.

Relocate sh

Maintain N

Construct a 

Provide cov

Relocate o

Rehabilitat

Retain histo

Construct a 

Retain sear

Retain con

Retain NPS 

Maintain o

Delineate fl

Delineate s

Provide add

Outdoor st

Maintain u

Reconstruc

Construct a 

Warehouse

Alternative

Construct a 

Warehouse 

12

3

45

6

7

8

9

12

10

11

13

17

14

16

15

5

5

10

123456789

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

18

19

19
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-103 

ALTERNATIVE 2: SELF-RELIANT VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND 

EXTENSIVE FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION 

Overview 

The guiding principles of Alternative 2 would include maximizing the restoration of the 100-year floodplain 

by removing infrastructure not essential to resource-related recreation, and creating a more self-reliant 

visitor experience, where fewer commercial services would be available. Visitor-use levels would be 

managed to allow for visitor experiences free of crowding or congestion. 

Management actions in Alternative 2 would: 

 Restore 347 acres of meadow and riparian habitat. 

 Slightly reduce the available campsites in all river segments (-8%) and in Yosemite Valley (-3%). 

 Significantly reduce the available lodging in all river segments (-43%) and in Yosemite 

Valley (-46%). 

 Reduce day-use parking spaces in Yosemite Valley (-23%). 

 Reduce commercial services. 

 Make significant changes to traffic-circulation patterns in Yosemite Valley to accommodate 

ecological restoration goals and reduce traffic congestion. 

 Accommodate approximately 13,900 visitors per day in East Yosemite Valley. 

 Continue to manage overnight use through wilderness permit system and a reservation system for 

lodging and camping. 

 Manage day-use capacity for East Yosemite Valley through parking permit system required during 

peak summer season. 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

Alternative 2 would protect and enhance river values through major ecological restoration to enhance the 

connectivity of the river to its floodplain. It would prioritize enhancement of ecological river values, 

including large portions of the 100-year floodplain, dynamic areas of the 10-year floodplain in East 

Yosemite Valley, and corridorwide riparian and meadow habitat, over the retention of existing 

infrastructure and circulation patterns. In addition to actions common to the other action alternatives, it 

would ecologically restore the areas currently occupied by the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp, campsites 

and lodging units in Yosemite Valley, the Wawona Golf Course, and the Concessioner Stables, and it would 

create a large valley oak habitat protection area. The free-flowing condition of the river would be enhanced 

by removing three bridges within the bed and banks of the river that constrict flow during high-water 

events. Hydrologic connectivity of meadows to the riparian floodplain would be enhanced through the 

removal of certain road segments that bisect meadows. 

Cultural and scenic values would be protected and enhanced as described under “Actions Common to 

Alternatives 2-6” (beginning on page 8-53). Recreational values would be protected and enhanced through 

the removal of the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp, and by improving visitor circulation and reducing 

crowding in Yosemite Valley. Table 8-12 provides a summary of the actions that would occur under 

Alternative 2 to protect and enhance river values. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-104 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-12: ADDITIONAL ACTIONS TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE RIVER VALUES, ALTERNATIVE 2 

Ecological Restoration Actions (Free Flow, Water Quality, Geologic/Hydrologic, and Biological Values) 

Corridorwide 

Ecological 

Restoration Acreage 164 acres (common to all) plus an additional 183 acres (refer to Appendix E for specific locations) 

Riprap to be Removed 5,700 linear feet (common to all) plus an additional 964 feet (refer to Appendix E for specific locations) 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

Riparian Buffer / 

Floodplain  Ecologically restore the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp. 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Free Flow / 

Geologic/Hydrologic 

Values 

 Remove Ahwahnee, Sugar Pine, and Stoneman Bridges to enhance the free-flowing condition of 

the river. 

Riparian Buffer / 

Floodplain 

 Ecologically restore 35.6 acres of floodplain at former Upper and Lower River Campgrounds. 

 Move Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area parking north outside the 10-year floodplain. 

 Ecologically restore 25 acres of 100-year floodplain at the North Pines Campground, 

Backpackers Campground, Yellow Pine Administrative Campground, and portions of Lower 

Pines campground. 

 Ecologically restore large areas of Yosemite Lodge and Housekeeping Camp, 

 Ecologically restore Concessioner Stables, Ahwahnee Row, and Tecoya housing area. 

Meadow Restoration 

 Remove 900 feet of Northside Drive through Ahwahnee Meadow to enhance connectivity of the 

meadow and floodplain. 

 Remove 1,335 feet of Southside Drive through Stoneman Meadow to enhance connectivity of the 

meadow and floodplain. 

Segment 7 : Wawona 

Meadow Restoration  Ecologically restore the 42-acre Wawona Golf Course to meadow habitat. 

Recreational Values 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall

Wilderness 

Recreation 

 Enhance wilderness character by removing the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp and converting 

this area to designated Wilderness. 

 Reduce zone capacities and convert overnight use to dispersed camping 

User Capacity, Land Use, and Facilities Management 

Alternative 2 would focus on providing a more self-reliant visitor experience, with a marked reduction in 

commercial services and facilities. As a result of this focus on self-reliance, as well as the goal of extensive 

floodplain restoration, the overall visitor use levels would be lower than current use levels to allow for 

increased resource restoration and for reduced crowding and congestion in the most popular areas of the 

river corridor. Table 8-13 provides a summary of user capacities by use type and location. 

TABLE 8-13: USER CAPACITIES BY USE TYPE AND LOCATION- ALTERNATIVE 2 

User Capacities by Use Type and Location Alt 1 (No Action) Alt 2 

Unit Type Units People Units People 

Wilderness Above Nevada Fall 

Visitor Overnight Use Zone Capacities & Beds 380 380 195 195 

Visitor Day Use Day Hikers 350 350 350 350 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 15 15 5 5 

Administrative Day Use People on Day Patrols 5 5 5 5 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-105 

TABLE 8-13: USER CAPACITIES BY USE TYPE AND LOCATION- ALTERNATIVE 2 

User Capacities by Use Type and Location Alt 1 (No Action) Alt 2 

Unit Type Units People Units People 

Yosemite Valley 

Visitor Overnight Use Rooms & Sites 1,500 6,564 1,006 4,758 

Visitor Day Use Parking Spaces & Buses 8,272 - 6,819 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 1,315 1,315 658 658 

Administrative Day Use Parking Spaces 166 332 166 332 

Merced Gorge 

Visitor Overnight Use Rooms & Sites - - - - 

Visitor Day Use Parking Spaces 180 869 180 869 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 9 9 9 9 

Administrative Day Use Parking Spaces 2 4 2 4 

El Portal 

Visitor Overnight Use Rooms & Campsites - - - - 

Visitor Day Use Parking Spaces 214 740 214 740 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 192 192 618 618 

Administrative Day Use Parking Spaces 610 1,220 610 1,220 

South Fork Above Wawona 

Visitor Overnight Use Zone Capacities 20 20 20 20 

Visitor Day Use Day Hikers 6 6 6 6 

Employee Housing Beds - - - - 

Administrative Day Use Day Patrols 1 1 1 1 

Wawona 

Visitor Overnight Use Rooms & Sites 203 865 171 673 

Visitor Day Use Parking Spaces & Buses - 1,295 - 1,321 

Employee Housing Beds 121 121 121 121 

Administrative Day Use Parking Spaces 30 60 30 60 

South Fork Below Wawona 

Visitor Overnight Use Zone Capacities 3 3 3 3 

Visitor Day Use Day Hikers 3 3 3 3 

Employee Housing Employee Beds - - - - 

Administrative Day Use Day Patrols 1 1 1 1 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

Camping 

The campsite inventory in the Merced Wild and Scenic River corridor, including Yosemite Valley, would be 

reduced by approximately 8% as a result of natural and cultural resource protection measures. All campsites 

within the 100-year floodplain would be removed. Campsite losses would be offset by the addition of new 

walk-in camping at a redeveloped Yosemite Lodge, east of Camp 4 Campground, and west of Backpackers 

Campground. Under Alternative 2, the total number of campsites in Yosemite Valley would be 450 sites, and 

the total number of campsites available in the corridor would be 521 sites. Table 8-14 provides a summary of 

the proposed changes to camping and the reasons for those proposed changes. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-106 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-14: CAMPING FACILITIES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Existing Locations Alt 1 

(No Action) Alt 2 Details 

Backpackers 25 sites 0 sites 25 walk-in sites removed from the 100-year floodplain, some of 

which will be relocated west of Backpackers 

Camp 4 35 sites 35 sites No change to this National Historic Register Site 

Lower Pines 76 sites 44 sites 32 sites removed from the 100-year floodplain 

North Pines 86 sites 0 sites 86 sites removed from the100-year floodplain 

Upper Pines 240 sites 216 sites 22 sites removed from the 100-year floodplain and 2 sites for 

cultural resource concerns 

Yellow Pine Administrative 4 sites 0 sites 4 group administrative sites removed from the 100-year floodplain 

Wawona Campground 99 sites 67 sites 32 sites removed from the 100-year floodplain or in culturally 

sensitive areas 

Total Existing Locations 565 sites 362 sites 

New Locations Alt 1 

(No Action) Alt 2 Details 

West of Backpackers 0 sites 16 sites 16 walk-in sites relocated from Backpackers Camp to less 

sensitive area outside 100-year floodplain 

East of Camp 4 0 sites 35 sites 35 walk-in sites constructed in area east of Camp 4 

Yosemite Lodge walk-in 0 sites 104 sites 100 walk-in sites and 4 group sites constructed 

Abbieville / Trailer Court 0 sites 4 sites 4 group administrative sites constructed in El Portal to replace 

Yellow Pine administrative sites 

Total New Camping 0 sites 159 sites 

Total Camping in 

Corridor 565 sites 521 sites 

Lodging 

In-park lodging availability would be reduced by approximately 43% as compared to existing conditions. 

Management actions related to lodging would focus on removing lodging from the 100-year floodplain at 

Yosemite Lodge and Housekeeping Camp, and in Wilderness. New hard-sided lodging would be constructed 

in Curry Village to offset the loss of year-round accommodations at Yosemite Lodge. As a result of these 

actions, the in-corridor lodging inventory would be reduced from 1,160 units to 660 units. Table 8-15 provides 

a summary of the proposed changes to lodging and the reasons for those proposed changes. 

TABLE 8-15: LODGING FACILITIES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Wilderness Alt 1 

(No Action) Alt 2 Details 

Merced Lake High Sierra 

Camp (MLHSC) 

60 beds 

(22 units) 0 beds Remove all infrastructure and expand dispersed 

camping into re-purposed MLHSC area 

Yosemite Valley Alt 1 Alt 2 Details 

Ahwahnee Hotel 123 rooms 123 rooms No change at this National Historic Landmark 

Housekeeping Camp 266 tent cabins 0 tent cabins Remove all units from 100-year floodplain 

Curry Village 400 units 

433 units 

(290 tents and 

143 hard-sided 

units) 

 Retain 290 tents 

 Retain 47 hard-sided cabin-with-bath units 

 Retain 18 units at Stoneman House 

 Construct 78 hard-sided units in Boys Town 

Yosemite Lodge 245 rooms 0 rooms Remove entire lodging complex, including those 

units in the 100-year floodplain 

Wawona Alt 1 Alt 2 Details 

Wawona Hotel 104 rooms 104 rooms No change at this National Historic Landmark 

Total Lodging in Corridor 1,160 units 660 units 

* El Portal: Private accommodations exist but are not on NPS land; therefore, they are not listed here 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-107 

Visitor Day Use Capacity and Access Improvements 

Day-use parking capacity in Yosemite Valley would be reduced by 23% compared to current levels. Day-use 

capacity would be actively managed and potentially restricted during peak use season (May through 

September). A day use permit system would be implemented in this alternative for East Yosemite Valley 

during the peak summer season. Table 8-16 provides a summary of the total number of day-use parking 

spaces for each segment of the corridor where parking occurs. 

TABLE 8-16: NUMBER OF DAY-USE PARKING SPACES BY SEGMENT, ALTERNATIVE 2 

Location Alt 1 (No Action) Alt 2 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 2,337 spaces 1,800 spaces 

Segment 3: The Gorge 180 spaces 180 spaces 

Segment 4: El Portal 214 spaces 214 spaces 

Segment 7: Wawona 290 spaces 290 spaces 

Total Parking 3,021 spaces 2,484 spaces

The most significant changes to parking and traffic circulation would take place in the vicinity of the 

Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area and Yosemite Lodge. Day-use visitors would park at a redesigned 

parking area at Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area, with a total of 550 parking spaces. At Yosemite 

Lodge, proposed changes include a new day-use parking area north of the core visitor service area, and 

additional overnight parking west of Yosemite Lodge to serve new camping areas. Total parking for East 

Yosemite Valley (including day, overnight, and administrative uses) would be approximately 4,000 spaces. 

Transit services would remain unchanged on the Highway 140, Highway 120 West and Highway 120 East 

corridors; one round-trip run per day would be added to the Highway 41 corridor. All within-park shuttle 

services would remain the same, and the East Valley shuttle would decrease shuttle intervals to 5 minutes. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-108 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

This page intentionally left blank 

 
Housekeeping Camp Footbridge

Northside Drive

Curry 

Village

Lower Pines

Campground

North Pines

Campground

Upper Pines

Campground

Clark'sBridge

Tenaya

Bridge

River Corr di or Boundary

Boys

Town

Sout

The Ahwahnee

hside Drive

Backpackers

Campground

Happy Isles Bridge

Merced River

Royal Arches

Meadow

Ahwahnee

Meadow

Stoneman

Meadow

Concessioner

Stables

Tennis Court

Former Upper and Lower

River Campground Area

Ahwahnee

Parking

Wilderness

Parking

Curry Village

Parking

0 0.25 Miles

1

2

3

4

5

6

ALTERNATIVE 2CURRY VILLAGE AND CAMPGROUNDS

Huff

House

Tenaya Creek

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: CURRY VILLAGE AND CAMPGROUNDS1. Former Upper and Lower River Campground Area • Ecological Restoration: Restore 35.6 acres of floodplain habitat within the 10-year floodplain. Restore natural  floodplain topography by removing remaining asphalt and re-establishing seasonal channels, and revegetate  with native plants. Remove Lower River amphitheater. Temporarily fence restoration areas to allow for recovery.2. River Reach between Bridges • Ahwahnee and Sugar Pine Bridges: Remove the Ahwahnee and Sugar Pine Bridges (and associated berm) to  enhance the free-flowing condition of the river. Restore area to natural conditions. Re-route the multiple-use  trail north of the river.  • Stoneman Bridge: Remove Stoneman Bridge to enhance free-flowing condition of the river. Restore area to  natural conditions. Reconfigure part of Southside Drive as a two-way road, remove the road segment through  Stoneman Meadow, and redesign intersection at Sentinel and Southside Drive.3. Curry Village Area  • Ecological Restoration: Remove Southside Drive through Stoneman Meadow to enhance the hydrologic  connectivity of the meadow. Re-align road through the Boys Town area to facilitate restoration of Stoneman  meadow. Extend meadow boardwalk (up to 275 feet) to Curry Village. • Lodging: Total would be 433 guest units, including: 290 tents in Curry Village retained; 78 hard-sided units  constructed in Boys Town; 18 units at Stoneman House retained; and 47 cabin-with-bath units in Curry Village  retained.  • Curry Orchard Parking Area: Re-design the Curry Orchard parking area to formalize 420 parking  spaces. Re-design will incorporate best management practices to increase hydrologic flows into Stoneman  Meadow and protect water quality. Remove apple trees to mitigate human-bear interactions, and plant native  vegetation.4. North Pines Campground Area • North Pines Campground: Remove all 86 campsites in the 100-year floodplain and restore to native  floodplain/riparian habitat. • Backpackers Campground: Remove all 25 walk-in sites in the campground, of which 21 are within the 100-year  floodplain. Partially replace with a new campground with 16 walk-in sites west of Backpackers Campground. • Concessioner Stables: Ecologically restore the stables area, located within the 100-year floodplain. Remove  associated housing (25 beds).5. Lower Pines Campground Area • Campground Sites: Retain 44 campsites and remove 32 campsites within the 100-year floodplain.6. Upper Pines Campground Area • Campground Sites: Retain 216 campsites. Remove 22 sites to restore the 100-year floodplain and an additional  two sites to protect cultural resources.

ALTERNATIVE 2: SELF-RELIANT VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
River Corridor Boundary

Merced River

Nor ht s di e Dr vi e

Ahwahnee Road

Southside Drive

Yosemite Creek

Bridge Cook's Meadow

Ahwahnee

Meadow

Lost Arrow

Church Bowl

Picnic Area

Sentinel Bridge

Housekeeping

Bridge

Superintendent's

Bridge

Housekeeping Camp

Yosemite Village Day-Use 

Parking Area

Village Store Complex

0 0.25 Miles

ALTERNATIVE 2YOSEMITE VILLAGE AND HOUSEKEEPING CAMP

2

3

4

5

6

Yosemite Village

7

Government 

Utility Building

1

Sent ni el Drive

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: YOSEMITE VILLAGE AND HOUSEKEEPING CAMP1. Lost Arrow: Remove temporary employee housing. Re-establish an administrative parking lot to accommodate 50  spaces.2. Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area: Move the parking area day-use parking northward outside of the dynamic  10-year floodplain. Formalize the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area using best management practices to  protect water quality to accommodate 550 parking places. 3. Floodplain and Riparian Ecological restoration at Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area: Remove fill material and  restore meadow and floodplain habitat within the dynamic 10-year floodplain.4. Pedestrian/Vehicle Conflicts: Re-route Northside Drive to the south of the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area.  Consolidate parking to the north of the road and provide walkways leading to Yosemite Village separating vehicle  and pedestrian traffic and eliminating conflicts and associated traffic congestion. Re-designed traffic circulation  patterns would not require roundabouts or pedestrian road crossings.5. Indian Creek Restoration: Remove housing and development in the 100-year floodplain between Village Store and  Ahwahnee Meadow. Recontour topography, restore stream hydrology, decompact soils, and plant native meadow  vegetation.6. Ahwahnee Meadow Restoration: Remove 900 feet of road through Ahwahnee Meadow and relocate the bike path  to the south, restoring hydrologic connectivity between the meadow and river. Re-route the formal foot trail in  Ahwahnee Meadow so it does not pass through wetlands. Restore meadow topography and native vegetation in  original trail corridor.7. Housekeeping Camp Lodging: Restore the 100-year floodplain to natural conditions. Remove all 266 lodging units  and amenities including shower houses, laundry, office, and grocery store. Convert area to day-use river access  point and picnic area. Retain one restroom for day users. Restore 16.8 acres of floodplain and riparian ecosystem.

ALTERNATIVE 2: SELF-RELIANT VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
oS u

ht s

di e

Drive

Camp 4 

Campground

Yosemite

Lodge

Sentinel Meadow

Merced River

Leidig Meadow

Cook's

Meadow

Nor

ht s di e

Dr vi e

Yosemite Lodge

Parking Area

Residence 1

0 500 Feet

ALTERNATIVE 2YOSEMITE LODGE AND CAMP 4

1

3

2

4

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: YOSEMITE LODGE AND CAMP 41. West of Yosemite Lodge  • Parking: Construct 150 new parking spaces southwest of Yosemite Lodge. This includes 15 spaces for tour  bus parking. Parking re-development will incorporate best management practices to protect water quality.2. Yosemite Lodge Area • Yosemite Lodge Re-development: Remove the 245 existing lodging units at Yosemite Lodge. Re-purpose the  area for day-use parking, a day lodge, food service, and camping and restore major portion of the 100-year  floodplain. • Ecological restoration: Restore riparian and floodplain ecosystem at the site of the former Yosemite Lodge units  and cabins (those that were damaged by the 1997 flood and subsequently removed). Delineate one service road  to the well house and parking. Remove non-native fill, decompact soils and plant riparian plant species (10.9  acres). • Camping: Construct 100 new walk-in campsites and four group sites in former Yosemite Lodge site.  • Day-Use Parking: Add 250 day-use parking spaces in the Yosemite Lodge area. Parking re-development will  incorporate best management practices to protect water quality. • Services and Facilities: Convert to day-use and retain core visitor services. Retain the food court. Re-purpose the  Mountain Room dining service and bar areas as a day lodge. Re-purpose the convenience shop and nature shop.  Remove the NPS Volunteer Office, post office, swimming pool, bike rentals, and snack stand. • Concessioner Housing: Remove housing at Highland Court and at the Thousands Cabins (as listed under actions  common to all alternatives). No new housing would be constructed in its place.3. Yosemite Falls Intersection • Traffic Congestion: Move the pedestrian crossing between Yosemite Lodge and Yosemite Falls to an on-grade  (street level) pedestrian crossing west of the intersection of Northside Drive and Yosemite Lodge Drive to  alleviate traffic congestion created by pedestrian/vehicle conflicts.4. Residence 1 • Residence 1: Relocate this historic structure, also known as the Superintendent's House, to the NPS housing area  and rehabilitate the building per the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and  the Historic Structures Report. Ecologically restore associated informal trails in Cook's Meadow and address continuing use patterns to enhance black oak woodland and meadow habitat. 

ALTERNATIVE 2: SELF-RELIANT VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
El Capitan

Meadow

Sentinel

Beach

El Capitan 

Bridge

Cathedral

Beach

Swinging

Bridge

Camp 4 Campground

Southside Dr vi e

Northsi d

e

Dr vi e

Merce

d River

Leidig 

Meadow

Slaughterhouse

Meadow

Sentinel

Rock

Lower Brother

Split Pinnacle

Cathedral Rocks

0 0.25 Miles

ALTERNATIVE 2WEST YOSEMITE VALLEY

1

2 3

River C

orridor Boundary

Old El Portal

Abbieville Trailer

Village

Rancheria

Flat

NPS Warehouse &AdministrativeComplex

F orest a

Road

SIERRA NATIONAL FOREST

STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST

National Park Boundary

Greenemeyer

Sand Pit

H ig

hway 14 0

Hwy. 140 

Bridge

0 0.4 Miles

ALTERNATIVE 2EL PORTAL

1

2

R vi

er Corr di or B

o

u

n

d

ary

M

erced

River

3

WEST YOSEMITE VALLEY1. El Capitan Meadow Area  • El Capitan Meadow Ecological Restoration: Remove all informal trails and areas of bare compacted soils and restore to native plant communities.  Disperse and reduce roadside parking along the meadow through alternative pavement striping (approximately 30 spaces removed); retain  some roadside parking for SAR and other administrative traffic. Use restoration fencing and signing where necessary to further protect the  meadow from trampling. No boardwalks are constructed in Alternative 2.2. Valley Loop Trail  • Trail Re-Route: Re-route trail through Slaughterhouse Meadow out of wetland habitat to an upland area. Move a 780-foot section of the trail  through Bridalveil Meadow to the base of the Southside Drive road shoulder.3. Yellow Pine Campground • Ecological Restoration: Remove administrative camping at Yellow Pine and restore the 100-year floodplain to natural conditions. Relocate 

EL PORTAL1. Rancheria Flat • Employee Housing: To replace temporary housing units to be removed Yosemite Valley, construct nine new units, away from sens

 administrative camping to Abbieville and the Trailer Village area in El Portal.

itive resources. 

2. Abbieville and Trailer Village • Abbieville and Trailer Village Housing: Remove or relocate 36 existing private residences in Abbieville and Trailer Village. This area would become  both concessioner housing and administrative camping. To facilitate removal of temporary employee housing in Yosemite Valley, develop  high-density housing units here for 405 employees. • Administrative Camping: Develop an administrative campsite at the Abbieville/Trailer Village area (camping relocated from Yellow Pine administrative site in Yosemite Valley).3. El Portal Village Center • Valley Oak Restoration: Restore the rare floodplain community of valley oaks in Old El Portal through implementation of best management 

 practices. Create a valley oak recruitment area of 2.25 acre in Old El Portal in the vicinity of the current Odger’s bulk fuel storage area, including  the adjacent parking lots. Decompact soils, plant appropriate native understory plant species, and treat invasive plants. Prohibit new building  construction within the oak recruitment area. • Odger’s Fuel Storage Facility: Remove bulk fuel storage facility, all associated development, and non-native fill from the floodplain. Decompact  soils, and plant appropriate native plant species, including valley oak. Relocate the fuel storage area outside the Merced River corridor or find an  alternate source for emergency fuel supplies.

ALTERNATIVE 2: SELF-RELIANT VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Merced R vi er

Merced Lake

Ranger Station

Merced

Lake

Merced Lake

High Sierra Camp

Merced Lake

Backpackers

Camping Area

Merced Lake

East Meadow

0 0.2 Miles ALTERNATIVE 2

MERCED LAKE HIGH SIERRA CAMP

1

2

River Corridor Boundary 3

River Corridor Boundary Wawona Maintenance

Area

Wawona Hotel

Wawona Golf

Course

Wawona

Campground

Wawona

Stables

South Fork Picnic Area

Wawona Store Picnic Area

0 0.1 0.2 Miles

ALTERNATIVE 2WAWONA

1

2

3

MERCED LAKE HIGH SIERRA CAMP1. Merced Lake Backpackers Camping Area: Discontinue designated camping in this area but allow dispersed camping here and in the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp. Remove  waste-water system and flush toilets. 2. Merced Lake High Sierra Camp: Close and remove this lodging facility. Expand dispersed camping at the Merced Lake Backpackers Camping Area into the High Sierra Camp  footprint. Remove all permanent infrastructure, including the buildings, water and septic system. Ecologically restore the area and convert the area to designated Wilderness. 3. Merced Lake East Meadow: Remove the meadow from grazing permanently. Require all administrative pack stock passing through the Merced Lake area to carry pellet feed.OTHER SEGMENT 1 CAMPING AREAS • Little Yosemite Valley: Discontinue designated camping in this area, but allow dispersed camping. Remove all infrastructure associated with the designated camping area. • Moraine Dome: Discontinue designated camping in this area, but allow dispersed camping.WAWONA1. Wawona Campground: Retain 64 campsites and one group site. Remove 32 sites that are located within the 100-year floodplain or culturally sensitive areas.2. Wawona Meadow Restoration: Remove nine-hole golf course and restore to meadow conditions. Retain spray field associated with waste water treatment facility.3. Wawona Stables: Eliminate stable operation and commercial day rides. Relocate two stock-use campground sites from a sensitive resource area to the existing stables area. 

ALTERNATIVE 2: SELF-RELIANT VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-119 

Detailed Description of Alternative 2 by Segment 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall (Wild Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

In addition to the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (beginning on page 8-53), Alternative 2 would 

include the following action to protect and enhance river values: 

Biological Values 

 Prohibit administrative pack stock grazing at Merced Lake East Meadow. Require administrative 

stock to pack in pellet feed. 

Recreational Values 

 Wilderness character would be enhanced through the removal of the Merced Lake High Sierra 

Camp and converting this area to designated Wilderness. 

 Reduce visitor use (thus crowding) at Little Yosemite Valley and Merced Lake by converting all 

designated camping areas to dispersed camping. With the conversion to dispersed camping visitors 

would have the opportunity to camp out of sight and sound from other campers. Additionally, 

trailhead quotas would be reduced for trailheads that lead to Little Yosemite Valley. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 2 would significantly reduce the amount of infrastructure and the amount of use in Segment 1 to 

promote dispersed camping and increase opportunities for solitude. In addition to the “Actions Common to 

Alternatives 2-6” (beginning on page 8-77), Alternative 2 would include the following actions to manage user 

capacity, land use, and facilities: 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Overnight use in this segment would consist of visitors staying overnight dispersed throughout the 

Wilderness. 

Private boating would be allowed in this segment under this alternative. Generally, this kind of use would 

consist of short floats using pack raft or other craft that can easily be carried into this remote area. Put-ins 

and take-outs would be allowed in dispersed areas. The level of use would be unrestricted as use levels for 

this activity would be expected to remain low due to the remote nature of this segment.

No overnight commercial groups would be allowed in Wilderness zones in Segment 1. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

Overnight capacities would be reduced through the trailhead quota system, as shown in Table 8-17, and 

services would be managed as follows: 

 Remove the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp. 

 Transition the designated backpackers camping areas Merced Lake, Little Yosemite Valley, and 

Moraine Dome to dispersed camping zones; remove infrastructure. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-120 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-17: WILDERNESS ZONE CAPACITIES – ALTERNATIVE 2 

Wilderness Zones Alt 2 Zonewide Capacity Alt 2 Zone Capacity 

Specific to the River Corridor 

Little Yosemite Valley Zone 25 people (-125 people*) 25 people (-125 people*) 

Merced Lake Zone 50 50

Washburn Lake Zone 150 100

Mount Lyell Zone 50 10

Clark Range Zone 50 10

Visitor Day Use Capacity 

Day use access to this segment is addressed under “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6,” beginning on 

page 8-53.

Administrative Activities 

 Reduce administrative activities as a result of the reduced zone capacities, removal of designated 

camping area, and removal of infrastructure. Backcountry utilities would no longer be needed in 

this segment following the removal of infrastructure at Little Yosemite Valley and Merced Lake 

High Sierra Camp. 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley (Recreational and Scenic Segments) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

In addition to the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (beginning on page 8-53), Alternative 2 would 

include the following actions to protect and enhance river values: 

Free Flow 

 Remove Stoneman Bridge and restore the river banks to natural conditions. 

 Remove Sugar Pine and Ahwahnee Bridges and associated berm/elevated trail connecting them; 

restore riverbanks to natural conditions; reroute multiuse trail north along the river. 

Water Quality 

 Remove the Curry Village stable and the pack trail from the stable to Happy Isles; restore to natural 

conditions. 

Biological Values 

Alternative 2 would restore major portions of the floodplain: 

 Remove all existing campsites and infrastructure within the 100-year floodplain and restore natural 

floodplain and riparian habitat (25 acres). 

- Backpackers Camp: Remove all 25 sites, 21 of which are in the 100-year floodplain (and 

within 150 feet of the ordinary high-water mark). (Replace 16 sites to the west of the 

current campground.) 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-121 

- North Pines Campground: Remove all 86 campsites and restore the 100-year floodplain 

to natural conditions. 

- Lower Pines Campground: Remove 32 campsites from the 100-year floodplain; restore 

the floodplain to natural conditions. 

- Upper Pines Campground: Remove 22 campsites from the 100-year floodplain; restore 

the floodplain to natural conditions. (Remove an additional 2 sites to protect cultural 

resources; retain 216 sites.) 

 Former Lower and Upper River Campgrounds: Remove all abandoned facilities, including the 

Lower River amphitheater structure, and restore 35.6 acres of natural floodplain topography and 

riparian/ wetland habitat within the 10-year floodplain; temporarily fence restoration areas to allow 

for recovery. 

 Yosemite Lodge: Remove most buildings at Yosemite Lodge, including the four that are within the 

100-year floodplain; restore the 100-year floodplain to natural conditions. 

 Former Pine and Oak Units: Restore 10.9 acres of riparian ecosystem at the site of the former 

Yosemite Lodge units and cabins (those that were removed after the 1997 flood) and wellness 

center while maintaining access to the well house. 

 Ahwahnee Row and Tecoya Dorms: Remove concessioner housing and development between 

the Village Store and Ahwahnee Meadow; recontour topography (using 1919 maps as a guide), 

decompact soils, and plant native meadow vegetation. Restore stream hydrologic function. 

 Yosemite Village: Move the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area northward, out of the 10-year 

floodplain of the Merced River and outside of a designated 50-foot setback from Indian Creek; 

remove fill material and restore the floodplain to natural conditions. 

 Housekeeping Camp: Remove all 266 lodging units and associated facilities at Housekeeping 

Camp (restrooms, shower houses, laundry, grocery store, and office), out of the 100-year 

floodplain; restore the floodplain to natural conditions by decompacting soils and planting riparian 

species. Direct visitor use and river access to the two resilient beach locations on the western edge 

of Housekeeping Camp and across the footbridge; fence off the current eastern river access point 

located on a steep eroded bank, and actively restore the riverbank with brush layering. 

Alternative 2 would enhance meadow connectivity by removing segments of roads and trails that currently 

bisect meadows, interrupting sheetflow and causing habitat fragmentation. 

 Bridalveil Meadow: Reroute the 780-foot segment of the Valley Loop Trail that currently crosses 

Bridalveil Meadow closer to the base of the fill slope of the Valley Loop Road. 

 Slaughterhouse Meadow: Reroute the portion of the Valley Loop Trail to an upland area out of 

wetlands at Slaughterhouse Meadow. 

 El Capital Meadow: Disperse and reduce roadside parking along El Capitan Meadow 

(approximately 30 spaces removed) to reduce the amount of social trailing into the meadow. Fence 

if necessary to further protect the meadow from trampling. 

 Ahwahnee Meadow: Remove 900 feet of Northside Drive and relocate the bike path to the south, 

restoring Ahwahnee e Meadow and riparian floodplain connectivity; restore meadow contours and 

native vegetation. Reroute trails through Ahwahnee Meadow so they do not pass through wetlands, 

consolidating use with the Housekeeping footbridge trail where possible; remove associated fill and 

restore trails within wetlands. 

 Stoneman Meadow: Remove the segment of Southside Drive that bisects Stoneman Meadow 

(1,335 feet); realign Southside Drive through Boys Town. Extend the boardwalk through wet areas 

to Curry Village (up to 275’). 
ALTERNATIVES

8-122 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Scenic Values 

 Eliminate visual intrusion of Southside Drive through Stoneman Meadow 

 Eliminate visual intrusion of Northside Drive through Ahwahnee Meadow. 

Cultural Values 

 Remove four structures from the collective sites representing the prominent historic patterns of 

development in Yosemite Valley: Sugar Pine Bridge, Ahwahnee Bridge, Stoneman Bridge, and 

Residence 1 (Superintendent’s House). 

 Relocate Residence 1 to the NPS housing area and at a minimum stabilize the building per the 

Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (NPS 1995). 

Recreational Values 

 Restrict boating to 25 people per day using private vessels only and to specific stretches of river in 

Yosemite Valley. This reduction in boats would enhances dispersed recreation along the river 

corridor. 

 Reduce available day-use parking and implement an East Yosemite Valley day-use parking permit 

system to reduce crowding at key attraction sites, along roadways, and in parking lots and other 

facilities). 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Alternative 2 would protect river-related recreational ORVs through infrastructure improvements where 

necessary, while reducing recreational activities that are not related to recreational ORVs. It would include 

the following changes to visitor activities and services in addition to those common to Alternatives 2-6 (see 

page 8-77): 

 Allow only private boating in this river segment. Private boats would be limited to the section of 

river between the Pines campgrounds and Sentinel Beach. Put-ins and take-outs would be limited 

to designated locations within the Pines campgrounds and day-use public sites. This use would be 

monitored by a river patrol and would be limited to 25 permits per day. 

 Remove Housekeeping Camp shower houses, restrooms, laundry, and grocery store. (Retain at 

least one restroom when reconfiguring the area for day use.) 

 Remove the Concessioner Stable and restore the area to natural conditions. 

 Remove Curry Village raft rental. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity: Camping 

Camping would be reduced slightly to 450 sites accommodating 2,916 people per night. Many campsites 

removed from sensitive riparian areas would be replaced by a new 100-site campground in the area 

currently occupied by Yosemite Lodge. The following actions would occur at specific locations: 

 Backpackers Camp: Remove all 25 sites, 21 of which are in the 100-year floodplain. Construct 16 

new walk-in campsites west of Backpackers Camp. 

 North Pines Campground: Remove all 86 campsites; restore the floodplain to natural conditions. 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-123 

 Upper Pines Campground: Retain 216 campsites. Remove 22 campsites from the 100-year 

floodplain; restore natural floodplain conditions. 

 Lower Pines Campground: Retain 44 campsites. Remove 32 sites that are within the 100-year 

floodplain. 

 Camp 4: Retain 35 walk-in campsites and 35 parking spaces. Construct 35 additional campsites east 

of Camp 4; establish a new parking area (41 spaces) for the Camp 4 campground expansion in the 

disturbed footprint of the former service station near Camp 4. 

 New Construction: Construct a new campground with 100 walk-in campsites and 4 group sites in 

the area formerly occupied by Yosemite Lodge. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity: Lodging 

Under Alternative 2 lodging would be significantly reduced to 

facilitate ecological restoration, day use, and camping. Lodging 

would total 556 units accommodating 1,842 people per night. 

Common to Alternatives 2-6, The Ahwahnee would continue 

to provide 123 lodging rooms. The following additional 

lodging would be retained, removed, or constructed under 

Alternative 2: 

 Curry Village: Retain 355 lodging units: 290 tents, 18 

units at Stoneman House, and 47 hard-sided cabins with bath. Remove all existing cabins and 

associated structures at Boys Town. Construct 78 new lodging units suitable for year-round 

accommodations at Boys Town (25 duplex buildings and seven 4-plex buildings, all with private 

baths); construct a new guest check-in building and pedestrian pathway; provide 78 new parking 

spaces along the existing roadway. Provide 420 designated overnight parking spaces at Curry 

Orchard. 

 Housekeeping Camp: Remove all 266 lodging units and associated facilities from the 100-year 

floodplain. (Convert the site to a day use river access point and picnic area, retaining one restroom 

for day use.) 

 Yosemite Lodge: Remove all 245 lodging units; retain the core portion of the lodge containing the 

cafeteria. (Convert area for visitor day use and camping). 

Visitor Day-use Parking Capacity and Transit 

Alternative 2 would significantly reduce the maximum daily visitation to Yosemite Valley. The day parking, 

regional transit, and tour bus capacities would accommodate up to 6,819 day users at one time in segment 2: 

 Reduce available day-use parking spaces (- 537 spaces) for a total of 1,800 parking spaces 

accommodating a maximum of 4,698 people at one time. 

 Accommodate an estimated 1,160 people at one time in circulation on Valley roads. 

 Accommodate a maximum of 241 people at one time arriving to the Valley on regional transit. 

 Retain tour bus parking at 15 spaces accommodating up to 720 people at one time. 

Visitor circulation would be improved to reduce traffic congestion and to provide a better arrival 

experience for visitors. Major actions would include the following: 

Conceptual site drawings for lodging 

improvements at Boys Town under 

Alternative 2 have been completed to 

allow the analysis of impacts of this 

potential project. See “Conceptual Site 

Drawings” at the end of the Alternative 

2 discussion for site details and design 

drawings. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-124 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

 Redesign day parking at Yosemite Village to provide 

550 designated spaces. 

 Construct a new parking lot and a comfort station, 

providing 150 parking spaces for day visitors and 

15 spaces for tour buses, west of Yosemite Lodge. 

 Redesign the intersection at Sentinel Bridge, and 

switch Southside Drive to a two-way road. 

Due to the reductions day use parking supply in this 

alternative, as compared to current peak demand, an East 

Yosemite Valley day-use parking permit system would be instituted. 

Regional transit service would be reconfigured to expand the number of routes, but to reduce runs on some 

routes, consistent with anticipated demand, as shown in Table 8-18. Shuttle service would also be improved 

as shown in the table.

TABLE 8-18: TRANSIT OPTIONS- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Regional Transit Options 

HWY 140 

Merced/Mariposa to Yosemite 

Valley 

8 runs per day (4 from Merced; 4 from Mariposa) 

(year round) 

HWY 41 

Fresno/Oakhurst to Yosemite 

Valley 

1 run per day 

HWY 120 West 

Groveland/Sonora to Yosemite 

Valley 

1 weekday run- Sonora to Valley 

2 weekend runs- Groveland to Valley 

(summer only) 

HWY 120 East 

Inyo/Mono County (Mammoth 

Lakes) to Yosemite Valley 

1 run per day 

(summer only) 

Yosemite Valley Shuttle Options 

East Yosemite Valley 5 minute peak interval between buses 

Year round except Visitor Center direct 

Visitor Center Express 

Yosemite Valley Day-use 

Parking Area to Visitor Center 

15 min. interval between buses 

(summer only) 

El Capitan Crossover 30 min. interval between buses 

(summer only) 

West Yosemite Valley No service 

Administrative Activities 

Administrative activities would be reduced commensurate with the reduction in services: 

 Remove the Yosemite Lodge maintenance and housekeeping facilities. 

Conceptual site drawings for the 

Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area 

and the new parking lot west of Yosemite 

Lodge under alternative 2 have been 

completed to allow the analysis of 

impacts of these potential projects. See 

“Conceptual Site Drawings” at the end of 

the Alternative 2 discussion for site 

details and design drawings. 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-125 

Employee Housing and Employee Parking 

Concessioner employee housing would be reduced commensurate with the reduction in services. 

Compared to existing conditions, 657 fewer concessioner employees would be housed in Yosemite Valley. 

The remaining housing for 494 concessioner employees would be provided as follows: 

 Provide housing for 387employees at Curry Village. 

- Retain permanent housing in the Curry Village residential area (223 employees) 

- Remove housing at Curry Village stable (49 employees) 

- Construct 16 buildings housing 164 employees. 

 Provide housing for 65 employees at Yosemite Village: 

- Retain permanent housing at Indian Creek, Lost Arrow Dorm, and Upper Tecoya 

Management Housing (64 employees) 

- Remove Ahwahnee Row, Y Apartments, garage housing, and Hospital Row (43 employees) 

- Remove Tecoya Dorms (232 employees) 

 Remove administrative campsites at Yellow Pine Administrative Campground (4 group sites for up 

to 120 people); relocate administrative camping to Abbieville and Trailer Court. 

An additional 426 concessioner employees working in Yosemite Valley would be housed in El Portal. 

Segment 3: Merced Gorge (Scenic Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

All actions to protect and enhance river values in Segment 3 for Alternative 2 are included in the “Actions 

Common to Alternatives 2-6” (page 8-53). 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

This alternative would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today. The majority of actions 

for Alternative 2 in Segment 3 are discussed in the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (page 8-77). 

Alternative actions that are not included in the Actions Common section are listed below. 

In addition to the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (beginning on page 8-77), Alternative 2 would 

include the following actions to manage user capacity, land use, and facilities: 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Only private boats would be allowed in this segment in Alternative 2. It is expected that kayaks would be the 

craft used in this segment. Boaters would be allowed on the river below Pohono Bridge (in Segment 2) 

through El Portal (Segment 4). Boaters would be allowed to put in and take out at any of the roadside pull 

outs. This use would be managed by a permit system and restricted to 5 boats per day. 

Transit Options 

Public transit options along this segment would be expanded as described in the Valley segment (see 

Segment 2 - Transit Options above). 
ALTERNATIVES

8-126 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 4: El Portal (Scenic Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

All actions to protect and enhance river values in Segment 4 under Alternative 2 are addressed in “Actions 

Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-53). 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 2 would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today. User capacity in this 

segment for this alternative is mostly affected by the increase in employee housing in El Portal. While all 

new units would be built outside of the 100-year floodplain, they would fall within the river corridor. This 

increase in capacity in El Portal is a function of the decrease in employee housing capacity in Yosemite 

Valley (Segment 2). 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Most visitor activities and services in Segment 4 are considered in “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” 

(page 8-77). Additional actions are listed below: 

 Allow only private boats in Segment 4. Expected use would be mostly rafts and kayaks. Boaters 

would be permitted below Yosemite View Lodge to beyond the Foresta Bridge (at which point 

boaters would exit the park). Boaters would be able to use put-ins and take-outs below the hotel, at 

the store/gas station and the Red Bud launch site. This use would be regulated through a permitting 

system that allows for 5 boats per day. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

No visitor overnight accommodations on NPS lands are proposed in this alternative. 

Visitor Day-use Parking Capacity 

Day-use and parking capacities would remain the same as current conditions, at a total of 214 spaces 

accommodating up to 740 people at one time. 

Administrative Activities 

All administrative activities in Segment 4 are considered in “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 

8-83). 

Employee Housing Capacity 

In Alternative 2, high density employee housing would be added to the Abbieville and Trailer Village site 

(405 beds) and infill units at El Portal Village Center (12 beds) and Rancheria Flat (9 beds). All new units 

would be outside of the 100-year flood plain. These units would be added to accommodate for the housing 

removed from Yosemite Valley (Segment 2) and would include the 426 concessioner employee beds 

relocated to El Portal from the Valley. 

Administrative use at the Yellow Pine Administrative Campground site would be moved to Abbieville and 

Trailer Court. 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-127 

Employee and Administrative Capacity 

Most employee and administrative parking actions are discussed in “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” 

(page 8-83). Additionally, 9 spaces would be added with the Rancheria housing expansion, 12 spaces would 

be added with the El Portal housing expansion and 405 spaces would be added for residents of the new 

Abbieville site. 

Transit Options 

Regional transit options would maintain existing service along the Highway 140 corridor. 

Segment 5: South Fork Merced River above Wawona (Wild Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

There are no actions in Alternative 2 that are specific to this segment. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 2 would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today in Segment 5. The majority 

of actions for Alternative 2 in Segment 5 are discussed in the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” 

(beginning on page 8-77). Alternative actions that are not included in the Actions Common section are listed 

below. 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Private boating would be allowed in this segment. Generally, use in this segment would consist of short 

floats using pack raft or other craft that can easily be carried into this remote area. Use levels would be 

unrestricted as little use is expected in this area due to its remote location. 

Transit Options 

Specific transportation options for reaching the trailheads that provide access to Segment 5 are listed below 

under Segment 7. 

Segments 6/7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment (Recreational Segments) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

In addition to the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-53), protection and enhancement of 

cultural values and water quality would be accomplished through the actions described below. 

Cultural Resources/Water Quality 

 Stock Campground: Relocate stock campground (2 sites) from a culturally sensitive area to the 

Wawona Stables area. 

 Wawona Campground: Remove 32 sites that are either within the 100-year floodplain or in 

culturally sensitive areas. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-128 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 2 would provide for reduced kinds and amounts of use in this segment compared to those that 

exist today. These reductions would be made to accommodate high levels of ecological restoration activity. 

The majority of actions for Alternative 2 in Segment 7 are discussed in the “Actions Common to 

Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-77). Alternative actions that are not included in the Actions Common section 

are listed below. 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Most visitor activities and services in Segment 7 are considered in “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” 

(see page 8-77). Additional actions are listed below: 

 Boating: Only private boating would be allowed. Expected use would be mostly kayaks and other 

small whitewater boats. Boaters would be permitted below Swinging Bridge to beyond the park 

boundary, with the exception of the Wawona impoundment. Boaters would be able to use put-ins 

and take-outs at Swinging Bridge, the store area, South Fork Picnic Area and below the 

campground. This use would be regulated through river patrol and monitoring as the use level is 

expected to be low, and therefore would not be limited. 

 Golfing: In this alternative the Wawona golf course and shop would be removed to accommodate 

ecological restoration, though the spray field would remain. 

 Tennis: The Wawona Hotel Tennis Court would also be removed under this alterative. 

 Wawona Commercial Stables: Stables and day rides would be eliminated under Alternative 2. The 

Wawona stock use campground (2 sites) would be relocated to this area. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

The total overnight capacity for Segment 7 would be 171 units accommodating 426 people. 

The Wawona Campground would reduce campsites to 65 sites (414 people). This includes a group camping 

site (to accommodate up to 30 persons). The two campsites at the Wawona stock camp would be relocated 

to the Wawona stables (accommodating 6 people per night each). 

Visitor Day Use Capacity 

Total visitor day use capacity for this area would be increased from 1,295 to 1,321 people at one time. This 

increase is due to new regional transit options that contribute up to 26 visitors at one time to this segment. 

Transit Options 

Regional transportation options between Wawona and Yosemite Valley and Wawona and Mariposa Grove 

would continue existing service. One run between Fresno and Yosemite Valley along Highway 41 would be 

added. 

Segment 8: South Fork Merced River below Wawona (Wild Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

There are no actions in Alternative 2 that are specific to this segment. 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-129 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 2 would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today in Segment 8 and 

significant changes are not proposed. The majority of actions for Alternative 2 in Segment 8 are discussed in 

the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-77). Alternative actions that are not included in the 

Actions Common section are listed below. 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Private boating would be allowed in this segment. Generally, use in this segment would consist of short 

floats using pack raft or other craft that can easily be carried into this remote area. Permits would not be 

required as the expected use level is very low. 

Transit Options 

Transit services for access to this segment are described above under Segment 7. 

Analysis of Facilities and Services 

Table 8-19 presents the park’s assessment of the particular facilities and services that would be needed to 

support public use and/or to protect river resources based on the types, levels, and locations of use 

proposed for Alternative 2. As an example, the goals of this alternative include a more self-reliant visitor 

experiences and extensive floodplain restoration. This alternative prescribes major restoration within the 

100-year floodplain and the lowest visitor use levels of all of the alternatives, therefore making it possible to 

by remove North Pines Campground and Housekeeping Camp, and shift the Yosemite Village Day-use 

Parking Area north out of the 100-year floodplain. In addition, the Yosemite Lodge overnight 

accommodations would be replaced with a campground and the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp would be 

eliminated. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-130 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-19: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 1: Wild 

Merced Lake High Sierra Camp Closed and removed 

No: Removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals because, under this alternative, use levels are substantially lower; therefore, the level of overnight accommodations and camping is substantially lower, and this facility can be removed. The number of camp beds allowed under this alternative are needed to support public use in a manner that is consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance river values. 

No: The High Sierra Camp is outside designated Wilderness; however it is surrounded by designated wilderness. Designated wilderness precludes the construction of new facilities such as this. Alternatives in Chapter 8 consider various means of addressing impacts to ORVs. 

Merced Lake Backpackers 

Camping Area 

Converted to 

dispersed camping 

No: Removal of this designated camping is consistent with landuse restoration goals because, under this alternative, use levels are substantially lower; therefore, the level of overnight accommodations and camping is substantially lower, and this facility can be removed. 

N/A: This facility will be eliminated.

Little Yosemite Valley Camping 

Area 

Converted to 

dispersed camping 

No: Removal of this designated camping is consistent with landuse restoration goals because, under this alternative, use levels are substantially lower; therefore, the level of overnight accommodations and camping is substantially lower, and this facility can be removed. 

N/A: This facility will be eliminated.

Moraine Dome Camping Area Converted to dispersed camping 

No: Removal of this designated camping is consistent with landuse restoration goals because, under this alternative, use levels are substantially lower; therefore, the level of overnight accommodations and camping is substantially lower, and this facility can be removed. 

N/A: This facility will be eliminated.

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds 

Upper Pines Campground Reduced 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 

Lower Pines Campground Reduced 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 

North Pines Campground Removed 

No: Removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals because, under this alternative, use levels are substantially lower; therefore, the level of overnight accommodations and camping is substantially lower, and this facility can be removed. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-131 

TABLE 8-19:

NECESSITY OF 

MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds (cont.) 

Backpackers Campground Removed (partially re-located) 

No: Removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals because, under this alternative, use levels are substantially lower; therefore, the level of overnight accommodations and camping is substantially lower, and this facility can be removed.

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 

Valley Campground Reservation 

Center 

Relocated (due to 

Southside Drive rerouting) 

Yes: The Valley Campground Reservation Center is an essential 

National Park Service point-of-contact for campers, and those who seek campsites, in Yosemite Valley. The Campground Reservation Center staff sells campsite reservations for all campsites in the park available for reservations. The Reservation Center is operated on a year-round basis. 

Yes. The Campground Reservation could be moved from its existing location. However, it is important to the successful delivery of services provided from the reservation center that any alternative location is near the Valley campgrounds. 

Housekeeping Camp Lodging Units Removed 

No: Under this alternative the level of visitor accommodations is reduced and therefore elimination of these rustic overnight guest accommodations are not needed to support public use in a manner that is consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance ORVs 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size to accommodate this lodging facility (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the overnight experience )are available for development in Yosemite Valley 

Housekeeping Camp Laundry Removed No: The public laundromat at Housekeeping Camp is not needed with the elimination of the Housekeeping Camp. 

No. This service is provided for 

Housekeeping Camp guests and is directly linked to the camp; relocating the service and providing a general laundry facility for park visitors is not necessary. 

Housekeeping Camp Shower 

Houses and Restrooms 

Retained 1 

restroom. Removed 

shower houses, 

laundry, and 

grocery. 

Yes: Public restrooms are needed in many areas throughout the river corridor to comply with public health regulations and meet the basic personal needs of visitors and employees. The public showers at Housekeeping Camp are provided for guest use as well as other patrons, including campers and hikers. 

No. The Housekeeping Camp restrooms and shower houses are components of the overnight guest accommodations at this location. They are required to be located within or very near the overnight sleeping units. 

Housekeeping Camp Grocery Removed 

No: This need for the grocery store is tied to the level of lodging units at Housekeeping Camp. With a reduction of lodging, the grocery store is not needed. 

Yes. The merchandise offered at this location is offered elsewhere in Yosemite Valley. 

Curry Village Lodging and Shower 

Houses Expanded 

Yes: Curry Village offers rustic and economy overnight guest 

accommodations consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs. This facility is needed to support public use by visitors who do not camp. 

No. This lodging facility is part of a National Register Historic District. It is not feasible to relocate the complex, including shower and toilet facilities needed by guests in without-bath accommodations, to locations outside the river corridor. 

Curry Village Overnight Parking Reduced Yes: Parking at Curry Village is needed to support the day and overnight visitors who use Curry Village. No. Parking areas of in these locations are needed to support overnight guests at this location. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-132 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-19: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds (cont.) 

Curry Orchard Parking Area Re-developed Yes: Parking at Curry Village Orchard is needed to support day and overnight visitors who use Curry Village. No. Parking areas of in these locations are needed to support overnight guests at this location. 

Curry Village Raft Rental Removed No: This is not a vital visitor service under this alternative. 

No. By its very nature, the raft rental facility should be located within the river corridor. 

in Yosemite Valley Removed and ecologically restored No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with the land use restoration goals and is not needed to support the High Sierra Camp operations. N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

Concessioner Stables Employee 

Housing Area 

Removed and 

restored ecologically 

No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with the land use restoration goals and is not needed to support employee housing needs due to a reduced level of visitor services.

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Northside Drive (Stoneman Bridge 

to Camp 6) 

 Roadway section 

removed 

No: Under this alternative this segment of Northside Drive through 

Ahwahnee Meadow is removed and therefore this bridge is not needed to support public use of the river corridor. Pedestrian, bicycle, NPS law enforcement and fire protection traffic would access the east Yosemite Valley by way of Southside Drive, which would be converted to two-way traffic. This change in traffic circulation for Yosemite Valley would be feasible due to substantial reduction in visitor use levels. 

N/A This section of roadway is removed and traffic is re-routed to Yosemite Valley destinations using nearby roadway sections. 

Southside Drive (through Stoneman 

Meadow) 

Roadway section 

removed 

No: Under this alternative this segment of Southside Drive through 

Stoneman Meadow is and traffic is routed through Curry Village giving pedestrians, bicycles, NPS law enforcement and fire 

protection access the east Yosemite Valley. This change in traffic circulation for Yosemite Valley would be feasible due to substantial reduction in visitor use levels. 

N/A This section of roadway is removed and traffic is re-routed to Yosemite Valley destinations using nearby roadway sections. 

Sugar Pine Bridge Removed 

No. Under this alternative this pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency vehicle bridge is not needed to support public use of the river 

corridor. Pedestrian, bicycle, NPS law enforcement and fire protection traffic would be re-routed north of river so that visitors can access points of interest in Yosemite Valley. Removal of this bridge will restore free-flowing conditions and riparian habitat.

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location given the circulation system for Yosemite Valley. 

Ahwahnee Bridge Removed 

No. Under this alternative this pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency vehicle bridge is not needed to support public use of the river corridor. Pedestrian, bicycle, NPS law enforcement and fire protection traffic would be re-routed north of river so that visitors can access points of interest in Yosemite Valley. Removal of this bridge will restore free-flowing conditions and riparian habitat.

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location given the circulation system for Yosemite Valley. 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-133 

TABLE 8-19:

NECESSITY OF 

MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds (cont.) 

Stoneman Bridge Removed 

No. Under this alternative this pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency 

vehicle bridge is not needed to support public use of the river 

corridor. Pedestrian, bicycle, NPS law enforcement and fire protection traffic would be re-routed north of river so that visitors 

can access points of interest in Yosemite Valley. Removal of this bridge will restore free-flowing conditions and riparian habitat.

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location given the circulation system for Yosemite Valley. 

Segment 2: Yosemite Village and Housekeeping Camp 

Ahwahnee Row Employee Housing Removed 

No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with land use restoration goals and these housing facilities are not needed given the substantial reduction of commercial services 

and lodging. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

 Lower Tecoya Employee Housing 

Area Removed 

No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals and these housing facilities are not needed given the substantial reduction of commercial services and lodging. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Lost Arrow Employee Housing Area 

Removed and redeveloped (as 

administrative 

parking) 

No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals and these housing facilities are not needed given the substantial reduction of commercial services and lodging. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Re-route Northside Drive south of 

Yosemite Village Day-use Parking 

Area and outside of the 10-year 

floodplain 

Rerouted roadway 

Yes: This roadway serves as the exit road for all Yosemite Valley traffic. The congestion created in this vicinity is a result of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts that would be completely mitigated if no pedestrians were required to cross the road from the parking lot to access numerous visitor services including the primary visitor center, museum, and the Valley shuttle. 

No. While some changes to the exact location of the road system could be feasibly rerouted for approximately 1⁄4 mile, it could not be removed in its entirety unless a suitable replacement that would accommodate high volume visitor traffic in Yosemite Valley is identified. 

Yosemite Village Day-use Parking 

Area 

Re-developed and 

expanded 

Yes: This facility will serve as the primary day-use parking lot for Yosemite Valley because it is proximate to numerous visitor services including the primary visitor center, museum, and the Valley shuttle. A day-use visitor parking area of this size is needed 

to support the level of public use that has been found to protect and enhance river values. 

No. While some changes to the exact location of the parking lot and road system leading to the parking lot could be feasibly relocated, the parking lot could not be removed in its entirety unless a suitable replacement that would accommodate high volume visitor parking in Yosemite Valley is identified. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-134 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-19: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Yosemite Village and Housekeeping Camp (cont.) Residence 1 (Superintendent’s House) Relocated 

Yes. This historic structure is a component of the Historic Resources ORV and would be rehabilitated and used to support the visitor experience. 

Yes. Under this alternative, the facility would no longer be a component of the Historic Resources ORV and could be relocated outside the river corridor to the lower NPS housing area.

Segment 2: Yosemite Lodge and Camp 4 Area 

Yosemite Lodge Overnight Units Removed No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration and visitor-service goals. 

No. While some buildings within the Yosemite Lodge complex could be relocated to sites further north of the Merced River, however, it is not feasible to consider a wholesale relocation of the complex to an alternative location. 

Yosemite Lodge Overnight Parking Re-purposed as a day-lodge area 

Yes: Parking is needed to support day visitors to the Yosemite 

Lodge. Parking is also needed for park partner organizations and NPS staff who use the Lodge’s meeting and interpretive spaces (i.e., the Cliff Room, Gardner Terrace, and the outdoor amphitheater). 

No. As long as visitor services are provided at Yosemite Lodge, it will be necessary to provide parking near the Lodge complex. 

Yosemite Lodge Garden Terrace 

and Cliff Room 

Re-purposed for 

NPS use to provide 

visitor services 

No: Under this alternative repurposing this facility space for daylodge area services would likely still be used for interpretive programs and for training courses, meetings, and special events. These facilities are vital to National Park Service and park partner operations. 

No. The Garden Terrace and Cliff Rooms are within the existing buildings at the Yosemite Lodge complex. The activities taking place at these locations could be considered for relocation to alternative facilities; however, it is not feasible to consider removing the buildings in their entirety. 

Yosemite Lodge Gift and Grocery 

Re-purposed for 

NPS use to provide 

visitor services 

No: Under this alternative this space would be repurposed for 

NPS visitor related services and would likely require a consolidation of this type of merchandise (packaged and fresh groceries, sundries, and outdoor products) frequently needed by campers and hikers into the portion of the facility that would have commercial services. 

No. The building currently housing the Yosemite Lodge Gift and Grocery Store is part of the Yosemite Lodge food service and retail structure and would be infeasible to relocate. However, the merchandise offered for sale from this facility could be relocated to other retail outlets in Yosemite Valley if sites outside the river corridor are identified. 

Yosemite Lodge Mountain Room 

Bar & Food Service 

Re-purposed for 

NPS use to provide 

visitor services 

No: Under this alternative this space would be repurposed for 

NPS visitor related services and food service would be provided in the portion of the facility that would have commercial services. 

No. The building currently housing the Mountain Room Bar is part of the Yosemite Lodge food service structure and would be infeasible to relocate. 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-135 

TABLE 8-19:

NECESSITY OF 

MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Yosemite Lodge and Camp 4 Area (cont.) 

Yosemite Lodge Mountain Room 

Restaurant 

Re-purposed as a 

day-lodge area 

Yes: Food services are necessary to support day-lodge visitors and those staying nearby in the expanded campground. 

No. The building currently housing the Mountain Room restaurant is part of the Yosemite Lodge food service structure and would be infeasible to relocate. However, the merchandise offered for sale from this facility could be relocated to other retail outlets in Yosemite Valley if sites outside the river corridor are identified. 

Yosemite Lodge Highland Court 

Employee Housing (Existing) Removed 

No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals and these housing facilities are not needed given the substantial reduction of commercial services and lodging. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Yosemite Lodge Employee Housing 

(Thousands Cabins) (Existing) Removed 

No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals, and these housing facilities are not needed given the substantial reduction of commercial services and lodging. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

West of Lodge Campground (New) Constructed Yes: Campgrounds provide overnight accommodations that allow visitors to have a direct outdoor experience. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location adjacent to the Camp 4 Campground (which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley.

Yosemite Lodge Parking Area 

(New) Constructed 

Yes: This facility will serve as a critical day-use parking lot for Yosemite Valley because substantial numbers of roadside parking spaces adjacent to meadows will be removed in the vicinity of the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area. This new parking area will serve as trailhead parking for the upper and lower Yosemite Falls trail, and overflow evening parking for Camp 4 Campground. 

It will also be used for the Wahhoga Cultural Center. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location proximate to upper and lower Yosemite Falls trailhead, Wahhoga, Camp 4 and the Yosemite Lodge could accommodate this parking area.

Segment 2: West Yosemite Valley 

Yellow Pine Administrative Removed 

No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals, and these administrative facilities are not needed given the substantial reduction of visitor use. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location could accommodate this campground. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-136 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-19: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 2 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 4: El Portal 

Rancheria Employee Housing Area 

(New) Constructed 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs, and to accommodate employees who provide resource protection services consistent with the mission of the National Park Service and current agency management policies.

No. In-fill employee housing should occur within existing employee housing areas

Abbieville / Trailer Village Employee 

Housing (New) Constructed Yes: Housing facilities to accommodate a portion of the workforce necessary to provide visitor services. 

No. There are no other suitable locations proximate with direct access to Highway 140 before entering Yosemite National Park boundary. 

Abbieville / Trailer Village 

Administrative Group Campground 

(New) 

Constructed Yes: Campgrounds provide overnight accommodations that allow visitors to have a direct outdoor experience 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in El Portal.

Segment 5 (Wild), Segments 6 & 7 (Recreational), Segment 8 (Wild) 

Wawona Campground Reduced 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience. 

No. This campground could not be relocated as no suitable alternative site exists in the Wawona proper adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience. 

Wawona Hotel Tennis Court Removed 

No: Opportunities for this type of visitor recreation is not considered a vital visitor service given the land use and visitor experience goals under this alternative. 

N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

Wawona Hotel Golf Course & Shop Removed 

No: Opportunities for this type of visitor recreation is not considered a vital visitor service given the land use and visitor experience goals under this alternative. 

N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

Wawona Stables Retained 

Yes: The Wawona Stables would be utilized as operational space to serve administrative backcountry operations. This facility is 

necessary to support horseback riding, which is a type of use that has been found to be consistent with the protection and enhancement of river values. 

No. The stable operates from a historic structure that could not be feasibly relocated. 

Wawona Commercial Horseback 

Day Rides Eliminated 

No: Opportunities for this type of visitor recreation is not considered a vital visitor service given the land use and visitor experience goals under this alternative. 

N/A: This service will be eliminated. 
Alternative 2: Self-Reliant Visitor Experiences and Extensive Floodplain Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-137 

Conceptual Site Drawings 

Boys Town 

In Alternative 2, all of these structures would be removed and replaced with 78 new lodging units suitable 

for year-round accommodation. This would consist of 25 duplex buildings and seven 4-plex buildings, all 

with private baths, and a new guest check-in building. A new 2,840-foot long pedestrian pathway and 

78 new parking spaces would also be constructed along the existing roadway. The Curry Orchard Day-use 

Parking Area would be formalized using best management practices to have a total of 420 parking spaces. 

New ground disturbance within the existing 8.4 acre footprint would include approximately 33,000 square 

feet for new buildings, 56,800 square feet of utility service trenching, 14,200 square feet for pedestrian 

pathways, and 23,400 square feet of new parking for a total of 2.9 acres. Construction staging would cover 

approximately 1.4 acres and would likely take place within the existing Orchard Parking Area. 

Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area 

In Alternative 2, the existing 6-acre Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area and all associated roadway 

improvements would be moved outside of the 10-year floodplain of the river to facilitate riparian 

restoration goals and to prevent further resource damage. Restoration actions would remove non-native fill 

material, re-contour the topography, and plant native vegetation. The redesigned parking area would be 

formalized to provide a total of 550 parking spaces. Northside drive would be realigned to the south edge of 

the parking area where it would connect with Sentinel Drive and continue west to Yosemite Falls and park 

exits. Consolidating the parking to the north of Northside Drive, with new and improved walkways to 

Yosemite Village, would eliminate vehicle and pedestrian conflicts. A new bus passenger unloading area 

would be established east of the Village market and five new spaces provided for bus parking. The 

Concessioner General Office, Concessioner Garage, Arts and Activities Center (former bank building) 

would be removed, while the Village Sport Shop would be repurposed as a visitor contact station. 

The area of disturbance for improvements at Camp 6 in Alternative 2 would cover approximately 22 acres 

and include 14 acres of clearing and grubbing, 1.2 acres for existing building removal, 1,000 square feet for 

the new restroom, 5.4 acres of pavement removal, 1.7 acres of new roadway, 2.4 acres for new parking, 

14,900 square feet of utility service trenching, and 38,000 square feet for new pedestrian pathways. 

Construction staging would cover an area of approximately 2 acres. 

Yosemite Lodge Parking Area 

In Alternative 2, the area west of Yosemite Lodge, currently used as parking for tour buses, transit buses and 

for overnight guests would be re-developed to provide 150 day-use parking spaces, parking for 15 buses, and a 

new 3,000 square foot comfort station. The area east of this parking lot and immediately west of the main lodge 

building and courtyard would be repurposed to a walk-in campground. The existing wellness center, linen 

storage and laundry buildings would be removed. Ground disturbance within a 11.9 acre footprint west of the 

Lodge would include 9 acres of clearing and grubbing, 55,850 square feet of existing building and pavement 

removal, 8,300 square feet of utility service trenching, 2.9 acres for parking, and 2,500 square feet for 

pedestrian pathways. Construction staging for the redesigned parking area and the campground would take 

place over a 2 acre area within the existing footprint. Existing vegetation would be retained to separate and 

screen parking bays while bioswales would serve to filter and treat storm water run-off. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-138 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Yosemite Lodge Housing 

In Alternative 2, the temporary modular housing at Highland Court and the Thousand Cabins would be 

removed. All lodging, parking and guest facilities associated with the Yosemite Lodge complex would also 

be removed and the site converted to a campground and day-use area within the existing developed 

footprint. 

 
*These drawings are provided to demonstrate where facilities would be removed, relocated, or constructed according to actions more fully described by project alternatives. The drawings 

 do not represent a final proposal. More detailed design and construction documents would be developed consistent with the general concepts presented here.

Huff House Employee Housing

Replace temporary housing with permanent facilities,

164 beds and 164 parking spaces

Boys Town Guest Lodging

Replace tent cabins 78 permanent guest cabins

and 78 parking spaces

Construct 4 two-story buildings for 32 occupants, 8 occupants per building.

Construct 11 two-story buildings for 132 occupants, 12 occupants per building.

Provide common recreational area, approximately 3,600 square feet.

Build plaza areas and walkways with site furnishings, accent paving, and 

enhanced landscaping.

Construct a shuttle bus stop.

Remove ice rink and bicycle rentals. Construct an employee parking facility with 

164 spaces.

Retain historic residence for housing purposes.

Construct 25 duplex buildings replicating historic cabins, or 50 u

Construct 7 four-plex buildings, or 28 units subtotal.

Relocate the Campground Reservation Center. Provide 8 parking 

Construct a roadway to connect Curry Village and East Valley Ca

parking spaces.

Improve parking area with 420 spaces and landscape buffers wi

will treat storm water run-off.

Curry Orchard Parking Area

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

10

11

12

14

8

9

2

1

3

4

5 6 7

11

12

13

9

8

15

16
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
*These drawings are provided to demonstrate where facilities would be removed, relocated, or constructed according to actions more fully described by project alternatives. 

 The drawings do not represent a final proposal. More detailed design and construction documents would be developed consistent with the general concepts presented here.

8

9

9

2

2

1

3

3

3

4

5

5

6

7
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
*These drawings are provided to demonstrate where facilities would be removed, relocated, or constructed according to actions more fully described by project alternatives. 

The drawings do not represent a final proposal. More detailed design and construction documents would be developed consistent with the general concepts presented here.

Construct 250 day-use parking spaces. Remove all 

existing lodging units. Locate new parking within 

disturbed area. Maintain existing vegetation as 

buffers to separate and screen parking bays, provide 

pedestrian pathways and bioswales that will retain 

storm water run-off.

Construct shuttle stop with shelter.

Retain core visitor service buildings and courtyard. 

Limit visitor services to food service, interpretive 

displays and restroom facilities.

Modify food service delivery area.

Move pedestrian crossing to Yosemite Falls west of the 

existing intersection.

Create 104 walk-in campsites. Provide 100 standard 

campsites and 4 group walk-in sites. Occupancy 

is limited to 6 campers per site. Standard walk-in 

campsite is 3,850 square feet (70-foot diameter), 

including 1,200 square feet of clearance with a 15-

foot perimeter buffer. Of the 104 sites, 4 are group 

walk-in sites.

Retain 35 existing walk-in cam

Construct 35 additional walk-

parking facility.

Construct a total of 191 parki

Camp 4 and 150 spaces for th

Maintain existing vegetation a

and screen parking bays, prov

and bioswales that will retain 

Construct a shuttle bus stop a
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-145 

ALTERNATIVE 3: DISPERSED VISITOR EXPERIENCE AND EXTENSIVE 

RIVERBANK RESTORATION 

Overview 

The guiding principles of Alternative 3 would include restoration of large portions of the floodplain and the 

riparian area within 150 feet of the river. This alternative would accommodate much lower maximum visitor 

use levels than today, and offer fewer commercial services and facilities. Visitor use levels would be 

managed to allow for dispersed visitor experiences free of crowding or congestion. 

Management actions in Alternative 3 would: 

 Restore 302 acres of meadow and riparian habitat. 

 Slightly reduce the campsite inventory in all river segments (-3%) and slightly increase campsite 

inventory in Yosemite Valley (+2%). 

 Significantly reduce the lodging inventory in all river segments (-38%) and in Yosemite Valley (-40%). 

 Reduce day-use parking for Yosemite Valley (-32%). 

 Reduce commercial services. 

 Make significant changes to the traffic circulation pattern in Yosemite Valley to accommodate 

ecological restoration goals and reduce traffic congestion. 

 Accommodate approximately 13,200 visitors per day in East Yosemite Valley. 

 Continue to manage overnight use through wilderness quotas, reservation systems for lodging and 

camping. 

 Manage day-use capacity for East Yosemite Valley through permits and a reservation system 

required during peak summer season. 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

Alternative 3 would protect and enhance river values through extensive ecological restoration that would 

include some portions of the 100-year floodplain and riparian and meadow habitat corridorwide. Similar to 

Alternatives 2 and 4, it would prioritize enhancement of ecological river values over the retention of existing 

circulation patterns and infrastructure. Ecological restoration actions would target priority meadow and 

riparian habitat for enhancement, including the area currently occupied by the Wawona Golf Course and 

the dynamic 10-year floodplain area formerly occupied by the Upper and Lower River Campgrounds. The 

free-flowing condition of the river would be enhanced by removing three bridges within the bed and banks 

that constrict flow during high-water events. Hydrologic connectivity of meadows to the riparian floodplain 

would be enhanced through the removal of certain road segments that bisect meadows. 

Cultural and scenic values would be protected and enhanced as described under “Actions Common to 

Alternatives 2-6” (beginning on page 8-53). Recreational values would additionally be protected and 

enhanced under Alternative 3 by reducing facilities and crowding in the wilderness above Nevada Fall, and 

by improving access to key attraction sites and managing boating to improve dispersed recreation along the 

river in Yosemite Valley. Table 8-20 provides a summary of the proposed ecological restoration actions and 

the reasons for those proposed actions. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-146 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-20: ADDITIONAL ACTIONS TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE RIVER VALUES, ALTERNATIVE 3 

Ecological Restoration Actions (Free Flow, Water Quality, Geologic/Hydrologic, and Biological Values) 

Corridorwide 

Ecological 

Restoration Acreage 164 acres (common to all) plus an additional 138 acres (refer to Appendix E for specific locations)

Riprap to be 

Removed 

5,700 linear feet (common to all) plus an additional 435 feet (refer to Appendix E for specific 

locations)

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall 

 Remove Merced Lake High Sierra Camp and restore natural floodplain conditions.

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 

Free Flow / 

Geologic/Hydrologi

c Values 

 Remove Ahwahnee, Sugar Pine, and Stoneman bridges to enhance the free-flowing condition of 

the river. 

Riparian Buffer / 

Floodplain

 Ecologically restore 36.5 acres of habitat in former Upper and Lower River campgrounds. 

 Move Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area north outside the 10-year floodplain. 

 Ecologically restore riparian habitat within 150 feet of the river at Backpackers Camp and 

portions of North Pines, Lower Pines, and Wawona Campgrounds. 

 Remove all of Housekeeping Camp and portions of Yosemite Lodge from the 100-year floodplain 

and restore natural floodplain conditions. 

Meadow 

Restoration

 Remove 900 feet of Northside Drive through Ahwahnee Meadow to enhance connectivity of the 

meadow and floodplain 

 Remove 1,335 feet of Southside Drive through Stoneman Meadow to enhance connectivity of the 

meadow and floodplain 

Segment 7 : Wawona 

Meadow 

Restoration  Ecologically restore 42-acre Wawona Golf Course to meadow habitat 

Recreational Values 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall

Wilderness 

Recreation 

 Covert Merced Lake High Sierra Camp to temporary stock camp with reduced overnight capacity 

and convert area to designated Wilderness. 

 Reduce zone capacities and convert overnight use to dispersed camping. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 3 would focus on providing a dispersed visitor experience, with marked reduction in 

commercial services and facilities. The overall visitor use levels would be lower than current levels to allow 

for increased resource restoration and reduced crowding and congestion in the most popular areas of the river 

corridor. Table 8-21 provides a summary of user capacities by use type and location. 

TABLE 8-21: USER CAPACITIES BY USE TYPE AND LOCATION- ALTERNATIVE 3 

User Capacities by Use Type and Location Alt 1 (No Action) Alt 3 

Unit Type Units People Units People 

Wilderness Above Nevada Fall 

Visitor Overnight Use Zone Capacities & Beds 380 380 260 260 

Visitor Day Use Day Hikers 350 350 350 350 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 15 15 10 10 

Administrative Day Use Day Patrols 5 5 5 5 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-147 

TABLE 8-21: USER CAPACITIES BY USE TYPE AND LOCATION- ALTERNATIVE 3 

User Capacities by Use Type and Location Alt 1 (No Action) Alt 3 

Unit Type Units People Units People 

Yosemite Valley 

Visitor Overnight Use Rooms & Campsites 1,500 6,564 1,098 5,027 

Visitor Day Use Parking Spaces & Buses - 8,272 - 6,289 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 1,315 1,315 1,086 1,086 

Administrative Day Use Parking Spaces 166 332 166 332 

Merced Gorge 

Visitor Overnight Use Rooms & Campsites - - - - 

Visitor Day Use Parking Spaces 180 869 180 869 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 9 9 9 9 

Administrative Day Use Parking Spaces 2 4 2 4 

El Portal 

Visitor Overnight Use Rooms & Campsites - - - - 

Visitor Day Use Parking Spaces 214 740 214 740 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 192 192 223 223 

Administrative Day Use Parking Spaces 610 1,220 610 1,220 

South Fork Above Wawona 

Visitor Overnight Use Permits 20 20 20 20 

Visitor Day Use Day Hikers 6 6 6 6 

Employee Housing Employee Beds - - - - 

Administrative Day Use Day Patrols 1 1 1 1 

Wawona 

Visitor Overnight Use Rooms & Campsites 203 865 176 703 

Visitor Day Use Parking Spaces & Buses - 1,295 - 1,321 

Employee Housing Employee Beds 121 121 121 121 

Administrative Day Use Parking Spaces 30 60 30 60 

South Fork Below Wawona 

Visitor Overnight Use Permits 3 3 3 3 

Visitor Day Use Day Hikers 3 3 3 3 

Employee Housing Employee Beds - - - - 

Administrative Day Use Day Patrols 1 1 1 1 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

Camping 

The campsite inventory in the Merced Wild and Scenic River corridor, including Yosemite Valley, would be 

reduced by approximately 3% as a result of natural and cultural resource protection actions. All campsites 

within the 150 feet of the river would be removed. Campsite losses would be offset with the addition of new 

camping adjacent to Upper Pines Campground and east of Camp 4, as well as new sites west of Backpackers 

Camp and west of Yosemite Lodge. Under Alternative 3, the total number of campsites in Yosemite Valley 

would increase to 477, and the total number of campsites available in the corridor would be 549. Table 8-22 

provides a summary of the proposed changes to camping and the reasons for those proposed changes. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-148 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-22: CAMPING FACILITIES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Existing Locations Alt 1 

(No Action) Alt 3 Details 

Backpackers 25 sites 0 sites 25 walk-in sites removed, of which 21 are within 150 feet of the 

river; 16 of these sites would be relocated west of Backpackers

Camp 4 35 sites 35 sites No change to this National Historic Register Site 

Lower Pines 76 sites 61 sites 15 sites within 150 feet of the river removed 

North Pines 86 sites 52 sites 34 sites within 150 feet of the river removed 

Upper Pines 240 sites 238 sites 2 sites removed for cultural resource concerns 

Yellow Pine Administrative 4 sites 4 sites No changes to these group administrative sites 

Wawona Campground 99 sites 72 sites 27 sites within 150 feet of the river or in culturally sensitive areas 

removed

Total Existing Locations 565 sites 462 sites

New Locations Alt 1 Alt 3 Details

West of Backpackers 0 sites 16 sites 16 walk-in sites relocated from Backpackers Camp to less 

sensitive area outside 100-year floodplain 

East of Camp 4 0 sites 35 sites 35 walk-in sites constructed in area east of Camp 4 

Upper Pines 0 sites 36 sites 36-site RV loop constructed 

Total New Camping 0 sites 87 sites

Total Camping in Corridor 565 sites 549 sites

Lodging 

In-park lodging availability would be reduced by approximately 37% as compared to Alternative 1. 

Management actions related to lodging would focus on removing lodging units from the 100-year 

floodplain at Yosemite Lodge and Housekeeping Camp, and in Wilderness. All permanent infrastructure at 

the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp would be removed. A temporary pack camp with a maximum capacity 

of 15 people would be sanctioned at the location of the former High Sierra Camp, accommodating limited 

overnight lodging in this location while still allowing the area to be converted to designated Wilderness. No 

new hard-sided lodging would be constructed in Alternative 3 in any part of the river corridor. As a result of 

these actions, the in-park lodging inventory would be reduced from 1,160 units to 725 units. Table 8-23 

provides a summary of the proposed changes to lodging and the reasons for those proposed changes. 

 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-149 

TABLE 8-23: LODGING FACILITIES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Wilderness Alt 1 

(No Action) Alt 3 Details 

Merced Lake High Sierra 

Camp 

22 units 

(60 beds) 

0 units 

(15 people) 

All permanent infrastructure removed. Wilderness lodging 

facility converted to 15-person temporary pack camp. 

Yosemite Valley Alt 1 Alt 3 Details 

Ahwahnee Hotel 123 rooms 123 rooms No change at this National Historic Landmark 

Housekeeping Camp 266 tent cabins 0 tent cabins Remove all 266 units from 100-year floodplain 

Curry Village 400 units 

355 units 

(290 tents and 

65 hard-sided 

units) 

 Retain 290 tents 

 Retain 18 units at Stoneman House 

 Retain 47 cabin-with-bath units 

 At Boys Town, Southside Drive is re-routed and the area 

restored. 

Yosemite Lodge 245 rooms 143 rooms Remove 102 rooms (four buildings) from 100-year floodplain 

Wawona Alt 1 Alt 3 Details 

Wawona Hotel 104 rooms 104 rooms No change at this National Historic Landmark 

Total Lodging in Corridor 1,160 units 725 units

* El Portal: Private accommodations exist but are not on NPS land; therefore, they are not listed here. 

Visitor Day Use Capacity and Access Improvements 

Day-use parking capacity in Yosemite Valley would be reduced by 32% compared to current levels. For day 

use, restrictions would be set due to proposed reductions in day-use parking in Yosemite Valley. Day-use 

capacity would be actively managed and potentially restricted during peak use season (May through 

September). A day use permit system would be implemented in this alternative during the peak summer season. 

Table 8-24 provides a summary of the total number of parking spaces for each relevant segment of the 

corridor. 

TABLE 8-24: NUMBER OF DAY-USE PARKING SPACES IN SEGMENTS – ALTERNATIVE 3 

Location Alt 1 (No Action) Alt 3 

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley 2,337 spaces 1,597spaces 

Segment 3: The Gorge 180 spaces 180 spaces 

Segment 4: El Portal 214 spaces 214 spaces 

Segment 7: Wawona 290 spaces 290 spaces 

Total Day-use Parking 3,021 spaces 2,281 spaces 

The most significant changes to parking and circulation would take place in the vicinity of Yosemite Village 

Day-use Parking Area and Yosemite Lodge. Day use visitors would park at a redesigned parking area at 

Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area, with a total of 550 parking spaces, and additional day-use parking is 

added to the west of Yosemite Lodge. Total parking for East Yosemite Valley (including day, overnight and 

administrative uses) would be approximately 4,300 spaces. 

Transit services would remain unchanged on the Highway 140, and Highway 120 East corridors; service 

would be reduced to one round-trip per day on the Highway 120 West corridor, and one round-trip run per 

day would be added to the Highway 41 corridor. All within-park shuttle services would remain the same, 

and the East Valley shuttle would decrease shuttle intervals to 5 minutes. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-150 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

This page intentionally left blank 
Housekeeping Camp Footbridge

Northside Drive

Curry 

Village

Lower Pines

Campground

North Pines

Campground

Upper Pines

Campground

Clark'sBridge

Tenaya

Bridge

River Corr di or Boundary

Boys

Town

Southside Drive

The Ahwahnee Backpackers

Campground

Happy Isles Bridge

Merced River

Royal Arches

Meadow

Ahwahnee

Meadow

Stoneman

Meadow

Huff

House

Concessioner

Stables

Tennis Court

Former Upper and Lower

River Campground Area

Ahwahnee

Parking

Wilderness

Parking

Curry Village

Parking

0 0.25 Miles

1

2

3

4

5

6

ALTERNATIVE 3CURRY VILLAGE AND CAMPGROUNDS

Tenaya Creek

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: CURRY VILLAGE AND CAMPGROUNDS1. Former Upper and Lower River Campground Area • Ecological Restoration: Restore 35.6 acres of floodplain habitat within the 10-year floodplain. Restore natural  floodplain topography by removing remaining asphalt and re-establishing seasonal channels, and revegetate  with native plants. Remove Lower River amphitheater. Temporarily fence restoration areas to allow for recovery.2. River Reach between Bridges • Ahwahnee and Sugar Pine Bridges: Remove the Ahwahnee and Sugar Pine bridges, and associated berm to  enhance the free-flowing condition of the river. Restore area to natural conditions. Re-route the multiple-use  trail north of the river.  • Stoneman Bridge: Remove Stoneman Bridge to enhance free-flowing conditions of the river. Restore area to  natural conditions. Reconfigure Southside Drive as a two-way road, remove the road segment through  Stoneman Meadow, and re-design the intersection at Sentinel and Southside Drive.3. Curry Village Area  • Ecological Restoration: Remove Southside Drive through Stoneman Meadow to enhance the hydrologic  connectivity of the meadow. Re-align road through the Boys Town area instead of the meadow, and restore  remaining area to natural conditions. Extend meadow boardwalk (up to 275 feet) to Curry Village. • Curry Orchard Parking Area: Provide 300 parking spaces. Ecologically restore part of the existing  parking area to accommodate Stoneman Meadow restoration. Re-design parking area using best management  practices to increase drainage to Stoneman Meadow and protect water quality. Remove apple trees to mitigate  human-bear interactions and plant native vegetation. • Lodging: Total would be 355 guest units, including: 290 tents in Curry Village retained; 18 units at Stoneman  House retained; and 47 cabin-with-bath units in Curry Village retained. At Boys Town, Southside Drive would be  re-routed to facilitate the restoration of Stoneman Meadow and the remaining area at Boys Town ecologically  restored. 4. North Pines Campground Area • Ecological Restoration at Campgrounds: Remove campsites within 150 feet of the river at North Pines, Backpackers, and Lower Pines campgrounds. Restore to 12 acres of riparian habitat. Designate a formal river  access point at North Pines campground. • North Pines Campground: Retain 52 campsites. Remove 34 sites that are within 150 feet of river. • Backpackers Campground: Remove all 25 walk-in sites in the campground, of which 21 are within the 150-foot  riparian buffer. Partially replace sites removed with a new campground with 16 walk-in sites west of Backpackers  Campground.  • Concessioner Stables in Yosemite Valley: Reduce the footprint of the stables to provide staging for temporary  pack camp operation at Merced Lake High Sierra Camp and overflow parking for campgrounds. Retain associated housing (25 beds). 5. Lower Pines Campground Area • Campground Sites: Retain 61 campsites and remove 15 sites from within 150 feet of river. 6. Upper Pines Campground Area • Campground Sites: Retain 238 campsites. Remove two sites for sensitive resource concerns. • New RV Loop: Construct a new campground loop with 36 RV sites.

ALTERNATIVE 3: DISPERSED VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE RIVERBANK RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
River Corridor Boundary

Merced River

Nor ht s di e Dr vi e

Ahwahnee Road

Southside Drive

Yosemite Creek

Bridge Cook's Meadow

Ahwahnee

Meadow

Lost Arrow

Sent ni el Dr vi e

Church Bowl

Picnic Area

Sentinel Bridge

Housekeeping

Bridge

Superintendent's

Bridge

Housekeeping Camp

Yosemite Village Day-Use 

Parking Area

Village Store Complex

0 0.25 Miles

ALTERNATIVE 3YOSEMITE VILLAGE AND HOUSEKEEPING CAMP

2

3

4

5

6

Yosemite Village

7

Government 

Utility Building

1

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: YOSEMITE VILLAGE AND HOUSEKEEPING CAMP1. Lost Arrow: Remove temporary employee housing. Re-establish an administrative parking lot to accommodate 50  spaces.2. Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area: Move the parking area outside of the dynamic 10-year floodplain. Formalize this parking area to using best management practices to accommodate 550 parking places and protect  water quality. 3. Ecological Restoration at Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area: Remove nonnative fill material and restore  meadow and floodplain habitat within the dynamic 10-year floodplain.4. Pedestrian/Vehicle Conflicts: Re-route Northside Drive to the south of the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area.  Consolidate parking to the north of the road and provide walkways leading to Yosemite Village separating vehicle  and pedestrian traffic and eliminating conflicts. This re-designed traffic circulation patterns would not require  roundabouts or a pedestrian undercrossing.5. Concessioner Employee Housing: Create a 50-foot setback from Indian Creek. Ecologically restore the riparian  habitat and protect using restoration fencing. Retain Ahwahnee Row and Tecoya employee housing.6. Ahwahnee Meadow Restoration: Remove 900 feet of road through Ahwahnee Meadow and relocate the bike path  to the south, restoring hydrologic connectivity between the meadow and river. Re-route the formal foot trail in  Ahwahnee Meadow so it does not pass through wetlands. Restore meadow topography and native vegetation in  original trail corridor.7. Housekeeping Camp Lodging: Remove all lodging units and amenities including shower houses, laundry, office,  and grocery store. Convert Housekeeping Camp to a day-use river access point and picnic area. Retain one  restroom for day users. Restore 16.8 acres of floodplain and riparian ecosystem.

ALTERNATIVE 3: DISPERSED VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE RIVERBANK RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
oS u

ht s di e

Dr vi e

Camp 4 

Campground

Yosemite

Lodge

Sentinel Meadow

Merced River Nor ht s di e

Dr vi e

Yosemite Lodge

Parking Area

Residence 1

0 500 Feet

ALTERNATIVE 3YOSEMITE LODGE AND CAMP 4

1

2

3

Cook's 

Meadow

Leidig Meadow

4

EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: YOSEMITE LODGE AND CAMP 41. West of Yosemite Lodge • Parking: Construct additional 150 day-use parking spaces southwest of Yosemite Lodge. This includes 15 spaces  for tour bus parking. Parking redevelopment will incorporate best management practices to protect water  quality.2. Yosemite Lodge Area • Ecological restoration: Remove four Yosemite Lodge lodging buildings (in addition to other structures listed in  actions common to all alternatives) from the 100-year floodplain and restore to natural conditions (3.3 acres).  Also, restore riparian and floodplain ecosystem at the site of the former Yosemite Lodge units and cabins (those  that were damaged by the 1997 flood and subsequently removed). Delineate one service road to the well house  and parking. Remove non-native fill, decompact soils and plant riparian plant species (10.9 acres). • Lodging: Retain 143 units at Yosemite Lodge with associated parking. • Services and Facilities: Retain the Yosemite Lodge Food Court and Mountain Room Dining Room and Bar.  Remove the post office, swimming pool, bike rentals, snack stand, and NPS Volunteer Office. Relocate the concessioner housekeeping and maintenance buildings.  • Tour buses: Remove temporary housing complex at Highland Court and establish a tour bus drop-off area with  three bus loading spaces.  • Concessioner Housing: Construct two new concessioner housing areas for 104 employees and construct 78  employee parking spaces. (Common to all alternatives is to remove housing at Highland Court and at the  Thousands Cabins.)3. Yosemite Falls Intersection • Traffic Congestion: Move the pedestrian crossing between Yosemite Lodge and Yosemite Falls to an on-grade  (street level) pedestrian crossing west of the intersection of Northside Drive and Yosemite Lodge Drive to help  alleviate pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and associated traffic congestion.4. Residence 1 • Residence 1: Relocate this historic structure, also called the Superintendent's House, to the NPS housing area  and rehabilitate the building per the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and  the Historic Structures Report. Ecologically restore associated informal trails in Cook's Meadow and address continuing use patterns to enhance black oak woodland and meadow habitat. 

ALTERNATIVE 3: DISPERSED VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE RIVERBANK RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
El Capitan

Meadow

Sentinel

Beach

El Capitan 

Bridge

Cathedral

Beach

Swinging

Bridge

Camp 4 Campground

Southside Dr vi e Northsi de Dr vi e Merced River

Leidig 

Meadow

Slaughterhouse

Meadow

Sentinel

Rock

Lower Brother

Split Pinnacle

Cathedral Rocks

0 0.25 Miles

ALTERNATIVE 3WEST YOSEMITE VALLEY

1

2 3

River Corridor Boundary

Old El Portal

Abbieville Trailer

Village

Rancheria

Flat

NPS Warehouse &AdministrativeComplex

F

orest a Road

SIERRA NATIONAL FOREST

STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST

National Park Boundary

Greenemeyer

Sand Pit

H ig hway 14 0

Hwy. 140 

Bridge

0 0.4 Miles

ALTERNATIVE 3EL PORTAL

1

2

R ve i r Corr di or Boundary

Merced River

3

WEST YOSEMITE VALLEY1. El Capitan Meadow Area  • El Capitan Meadow Ecological Restoration: Remove all informal trails from the meadow that incise, promote habitat fragmentation, or are located  in sensitive and frequently inundated areas, and restore to natural conditions. Use restoration fencing and signing to designate appropriate  meadow access points. No boardwalks are constructed in this alternative.2. Valley Loop Trail  • Trail Re-Route: Reroute trail through Slaughterhouse Meadow out of wetland habitat to an upland area. Move a 780-foot section of the trail  through Bridalveil Meadow to the base of the Valley Loop Road shoulder. 3. Yellow Pine Campground • Administrative-Use Campground: Retain Yellow Pine Campground’s four group sites (serving up to 120 people) for administrative use.

EL PORTAL1. Rancheria Flat • Employee Housing: To replace temporary housing units that will be removed from Yosemite Valley, construct one dormitory for 12 employees  plus units for seven additional employees, for a total of 19 employee beds, away from sensitive resources. 2. Abbieville and Trailer Village Area • Abbieville and Trailer Village Housing: Remove or relocate 36 existing private residences. Continue to provide for housing land use for 40  employees and volunteers at this location. As homes within the 150-foot riparian buffer become vacant, ecologically restore these areas. 3. El Portal Village Center • Valley Oak Restoration: Restore the rare floodplain community of valley oaks in Old El Portal through implementation of best management  practices. Create a valley oak recruitment area of 2.25 acre in Old El Portal in the vicinity of the current Odger’s bulk fuel storage area, including  the adjacent parking lots. Decompact soils, plant appropriate native understory plant species, and treat invasive plants. Prohibit new building  construction within the oak recruitment area. • Odger’s Fuel Storage Facility: Remove bulk fuel storage facility, all associated development, and non-native fill from the floodplain. Decompact  soils, and plant appropriate native plant species, including valley oak. Relocate the fuel storage area outside the Merced River corridor or find an  alternate source for emergency fuel supplies.

ALTERNATIVE 3: DISPERSED VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE RIVERBANK RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Merced R vi er

Merced Lake

Ranger Station

Merced

Lake Merced Lake High Sierra Camp

Merced Lake

Backpackers

Camping Area

Merced Lake

East Meadow

0 0.2 Miles ALTERNATIVE 3

MERCED LAKE HIGH SIERRA CAMP

1

2

River Corridor Boundary 3

MERCED LAKE HIGH SIERRA CAMP1. Merced Lake Backpackers Camping Area: Discontinue designated camping in this camping area but allow dispersed camping in the area of the former Merced Lake Backpackers  Camping Area and the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp. Remove waste water system. Replace flush toilets with composting toilets. 2. Merced Lake High Sierra Camp: Convert Merced Lake High Sierra Camp to a temporary pack camp with a maximum group size of 15 people. Remove permanent infrastructure,  including buildings, water system and septic system. Ecologically restore the area and convert area to designated Wilderness.3. Merced Lake East Meadow: Develop preliminary grazing capacities for the meadow. When the meadow recovers, allow administrative grazing at established capacities. Monitor  annually for five years, adapting use levels as needed to protect meadow.OTHER SEGMENT 1 CAMPING AREAS • Little Yosemite Valley: Discontinue designated camping but allow dispersed camping in this area. Remove all infrastructure, except for the composting toilets. • Moraine Dome: Discontinue designated camping but allow dispersed camping in this area.WAWONA1. Wawona Campground: Retain 64 campsites and one group site. Remove 32 sites that are located within the 100-year floodplain or culturally sensitive areas.2. Wawona Meadow Restoration: Remove golf course and restore to meadow conditions. Retain spray field associated with waste water treatment facility.3. Wawona Stables: Eliminate stable operation and commercial day rides. Relocate two stock-use campground sites from a sensitive resource area to the existing stables area.

ALTERNATIVE 3: DISPERSED VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE RIVERBANK RESTORATION
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-161 

Detailed Description of Alternative 3 by Segment 

Segment 1: Wilderness above Nevada Fall (Wild Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

In addition to the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (beginning on page 8-53), Alternative 3 would 

include the following action to protect and enhance river values: 

Biological Values 

 Establish preliminary grazing capacities for Merced Lake East Meadow; monitor, and adapted as 

necessary. 

Recreational Values 

Enhance Wilderness character by replacing the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp with a temporary stock 

camp and converting this area to designated Wilderness. 

 Reduce crowding by converting all designated camping areas to dispersed camping. 

 Reduce trailhead quotas for trailheads that lead to Little Yosemite Valley. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 3 would reduce the amount of infrastructure in the river corridor in Segment 1, reduce the 

capacity of the Little Yosemite Valley Wilderness zone, re-purpose the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp as a 

temporary outfitter camp, and maintain the existing Wilderness zone quotas for all other zones in the river 

corridor. In addition to the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (page 8-77), Alternative 3 would include 

the following actions to manage user capacity, land use, and facilities: 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Primary activities in Segment 1 would continue to include hiking and overnight backpacking. Backpackers 

would continue to have the choice of staying overnight at designated camping areas or dispersing 

throughout the Wilderness. 

Private boating would be allowed in Segment 1 under Alternative 3. Generally, this kind of use would 

consist of short floats using pack raft or other craft that can easily be carried into this remote area. Put-ins 

and take-outs would be dispersed and the use level would be unrestricted due to the expected low use levels 

associated with this remote area of the river. 

One overnight commercial group would be allowed per wilderness zone in Segment 1. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

The Wilderness trailhead quota system would be maintained, with the changes proposed in Table 8-25. 

Services would be managed as follows under Alternative 3: 

 Convert the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp to a temporary pack camp with a maximum of 15 

people allowed; remove permanent infrastructure, including the water treatment system, and 

convert area to designated Wilderness. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-162 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

 Convert the Merced Lake backpackers camping area to dispersed camping; replace the flush toilet 

with a composting toilet. 

 Convert the Little Yosemite Valley designated backpacker camping area to dispersed camping; 

retain the composting toilet. Reduce the capacity of the Little Yosemite Valley Wilderness zone. 

 Eliminate the designated backpacker camping area at Moraine Dome. 

TABLE 8-25: WILDERNESS ZONE CAPACITIES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Wilderness Zones Alt 3 Zonewide Capacity Alt 3 Zone Capacity 

Specific to the River Corridor 

Little Yosemite Valley Zone 75 people (-75 people*) 75 people (-75 people*) 

Merced Lake Zone 50 50 

Washburn Lake Zone 150 100 

Mount Lyell Zone 50 10 

Clark Range Zone 50 10 

* Number of people reduced from Alternative 1 (No Action) to Alternative 3 

Visitor Day Use Capacity 

Day use access to this segment is addressed under the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6.” 

Administrative Activities 

 Continue current administrative activities, which consist primarily of regular ranger patrols and 

backcountry utility work as well as occasional trail/restoration crews. These activities are seasonal 

and minimal in comparison to visitor use and would not affect overall user capacity.

Segment 2: Yosemite Valley (Recreational & Scenic Segments) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

In addition to the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (beginning on page 8-53), Alternative 3 would 

include the following action to protect and enhance river values: 

Free Flow 

 Remove Stoneman Bridge and restore the riverbanks to natural conditions. 

 Remove Sugar Pine and Ahwahnee Bridges and associated berm/ elevated trail connecting them; 

restore banks to natural conditions; re-route multi-use trail north along the river. 

Biological Values 

Alternative 3 would remove all campsites within 150 feet of the high-water mark: 

 Remove all existing campsites and infrastructure within 150 feet of the ordinary high-water mark 

and restore natural floodplain and riparian habitat (12 acres). 

- Backpackers Camp: Remove all 25 sites, 21 of which are in the 100-year floodplain (and 

within 150 feet of the ordinary high-water mark). (Replace 16 sites to the west of the 

current campground.) 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-163 

- North Pines Campground: Remove 34 sites from within 150 feet of the ordinary highwater mark; restore native riparian vegetation. 

- Lower Pines Campground: Remove 15 sites from within 150 feet of the ordinary highwater mark); restore native riparian vegetation. 

- Upper Pines Campground: Retain 238 campsites, 22 of which are in the 100-year 

floodplain. 

 Former Lower and Upper River Campgrounds: Remove all abandoned facilities, including the 

Lower River amphitheater structure, and restore 35.6 acres of natural floodplain topography and 

riparian/wetland habitat within the 10-year floodplain; temporarily fence restoration areas to allow 

for recovery. 

 Yosemite Lodge: Remove four buildings at Yosemite Lodge containing 102 lodging units that are 

currently within the 100-year floodplain; restore the floodplain to natural conditions. 

 Former Pine and Oak Units: Restore 10.9 acres of riparian ecosystem at the site of the former 

Yosemite Lodge units and cabins (those that were removed after the 1997 flood) and wellness 

center while maintaining access to the well house. 

 Yosemite Village: Move the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area northward, out of the 10-year 

floodplain of the Merced River and outside a designated 50-foot setback from Indian Creek; 

remove fill material and restore the floodplain to natural conditions. 

 Housekeeping Camp: Remove all 266 lodging units and associated facilities at Housekeeping 

Camp (restrooms, shower houses, laundry, grocery store, and office), out of the 100-year 

floodplain; convert area to a day-use access point. Direct visitor use and river access to the two 

resilient beach locations on the western edge of Housekeeping Camp and across the footbridge. 

Fence off the current eastern river access point located on a steep eroded bank, and actively restore 

the riverbank with brush layering. Where infrastructure is removed, decompact soils and plant 

riparian species. 

Alternative 3 would enhance meadow connectivity by removing segments of roads and trails that currently 

bisect meadows, interrupting sheetflow and causing habitat fragmentation. 

 Bridalveil Meadow: Reroute the 780-foot segment of the Valley Loop Trail that currently crosses 

Bridalveil Meadow closer to the base of the fill slope of the Valley Loop Road. 

 Slaughterhouse Meadow: Reroute the portion of the Valley Loop Trail to an upland area out of 

wetlands at Slaughterhouse Meadow. 

 El Capitan Meadow: Fence the northern perimeter of meadow to protect the restoration area, and 

designate appropriate access points using boardwalks and viewing platforms. 

 Ahwahnee Meadow: Remove 900 feet of Northside Drive from Ahwahnee Meadow; relocate the 

bike path to the south, restoring the meadow and riparian floodplain connectivity; restore meadow 

contours and native vegetation. Reroute trails through Ahwahnee Meadow so they do not pass 

through wetlands, consolidating use with the Housekeeping footbridge trail where possible; 

remove associated fill and restore trails within wetlands. 

 Stoneman Meadow: Remove the segment of Southside Drive that bisects Stoneman Meadow 

(1,335 feet); realign Southside Drive through Boys Town. Extend the boardwalk through wet areas 

to Curry Village (up to 275 feet). 

Scenic Values 

 Eliminate visual intrusion of Southside Drive through Stoneman Meadow 

 Eliminate visual intrusion of Northside Drive through Ahwahnee Meadow. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-164 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Cultural Values 

 Remove four structures from the collective sites representing the prominent historic patterns of 

development in Yosemite Valley: Sugar Pine Bridge, Ahwahnee Bridge, Stoneman Bridge, and 

Residence 1 (Superintendent’s House). 

 Relocate Residence 1 to the NPS housing area and at a minimum stabilize the building per the 

Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (NPS 1995). 

Recreational Values 

 Restrict boating to 50 people per day using private vessels only and restrict use to specific stretches 

of river in Yosemite Valley. This reduction in boats would enhance dispersed recreation along the 

river corridor. 

 Reduce the available day-use parking and implement at a East Yosemite Valley Day-use Parking 

Permit system in East Yosemite Valley to reduce crowding at key attraction sites, along roadways, 

and in parking lots and other facilities. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Alternative 3 would protect river-related recreational ORVs through infrastructure improvements where 

necessary, while reducing recreational activities that are not related to recreational ORVs. It would include 

the following changes to visitor activities and services in addition to those common to Alternatives 2-6 (see 

page 8-77): 

 Allow only private boating in this river segment. Private boats would be limited to the section of 

river between the Housekeeping Camp and Cathedral Beach. Put-ins and take-outs would be 

limited to designated locations within Housekeeping Camp, Sentinel Beach, and Cathedral Beach. 

This use would be monitored by a river patrol ranger and would be limited to 50 trips per day. 

 Remove Housekeeping Camp shower houses, restrooms, laundry, and grocery store. (Retain at 

least one restroom when reconfiguring the area for day use.) 

 Continue to provide staging at the Concessioner Stable for temporary pack camp operation at 

Merced Lake High Sierra Camp; reduce the stable size and provide overflow parking for 

campgrounds; retain kennel service. 

 Remove Curry Village raft rental. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity: Camping 

Camping would be slightly increased under Alternative 3 to 477 sites accommodating 2,958 people per night: 

 Backpackers Camp: Remove all 25 sites, 21 of which are in the100-year floodplain. Construct 16 

new walk-in campsites west of Backpackers Camp. 

 North Pines Campground: Retain 52 campsites. Remove 34 sites from within 150 feet of the 

ordinary high-water mark; restore native riparian communities. 

 Upper Pines Campground: Retain 238 campsites. Construct a new recreational vehicle 

campground loop with 36 RV sites. 

 Lower Pines Campground: Retain 61 campsites. Remove 15 sites from within 150 feet of the 

ordinary high-water mark. 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-165 

 Camp 4: Retain 35 walk-in campsites and 35 parking spaces. Construct 35 additional campsites east 

of Camp 4; establish a new parking area (41 spaces) for the Camp 4 campground expansion in the 

disturbed footprint of the former service station near Camp 4. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity: Lodging 

Lodging would be significantly reduced to facilitate ecological restoration, day use, and camping. Lodging 

would total 621 units accommodating 2,069 people per night. Common to Alternatives 2-6, The Ahwahnee 

would continue to provide 123 lodging rooms. The following additional lodging would be retained, 

removed, or constructed under Alternative 3: 

 Curry Village: Retain 355 lodging units at Curry Village: 

290 tents, 18 units at Stoneman House, 47 hard-sided 

cabins with bath. Remove all existing cabins and associated 

structures at Boys Town. Provide 300 designated overnight 

parking spaces at Curry Orchard; restore ecological 

conditions to part of the existing parking area, removing 

50 spaces, to improve natural surface flows to Stoneman 

Meadow. 

 Housekeeping Camp: Remove all 266 lodging units and 

associated facilities from the 100-year floodplain. Convert 

area to a day use river access point and picnic area. Retain 

one restroom for day use. 

 Yosemite Lodge: Retain 143 units lodging units; remove 4 buildings (containing 102 lodging units) 

from the 100-year floodplain. 

Visitor Day-use Parking Capacity and Transit 

Alternative 3 would significantly reduce the maximum daily visitation to Yosemite Valley. The day parking, 

regional transit, and tour bus capacities would accommodate up to 6,289 day users at one time in Segment 2: 

 Reduce available day-use parking spaces (- 740 spaces) for a total of 1,597 parking spaces 

accommodating a maximum of 4,168 people at one time. 

 Accommodate an estimated 1,160 people at one time in circulation on Valley roads. 

 Accommodate a maximum of 241 people at one time arriving to the Valley on regional transit. 

 Retain tour bus parking at 15 spaces accommodating up to 720 people at one time. 

Visitor circulation would be improved to reduce traffic congestion 

and to provide a better arrival experience for visitors. Major actions 

would include the following: 

 Redesign day parking at Yosemite Village to provide 550 

designated spaces. 

 Construct a parking lot with 150 designated day parking 

spaces and a new 3,000 square foot comfort station west of 

Yosemite Lodge; provide 15 bus loading/unloading spaces. 

 Redesign the intersection at Sentinel Bridge; switch 

Southside Drive to a two-way road. 

Conceptual site drawings road and 

parking improvements at Boys 

Town under Alternative 3 have 

been completed to allow the 

analysis of impacts of this potential 

project. See “Conceptual Site 

Drawings” at the end of the 

Alternative 3 discussion for site 

details and design drawings.

Conceptual site drawings for the 

Yosemite Village Day-use Parking 

Area and the new parking lot west 

of Yosemite Lodge under 

Alternative 3 have been completed 

to allow the analysis of impacts of 

these potential projects. See 

“Conceptual Site Drawings” at the 

end of the Alternative 3 discussion 

for site details and design drawings. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-166 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Due to the reductions day use parking supply in this alternative, as compared to current peak demand, an 

East Yosemite Valley Day Use Parking Permit System would be instituted. 

Regional transit service would be reconfigured to expand the number of routes, but to reduce runs on some 

routes, consistent with anticipated demand, as follows: 

 Highway 140 (Merced to Yosemite Valley): Maintain service at 8 runs per day. 

 Highway 41 between Fresno and Yosemite Valley: Implement new public transit service at 1 

run/day. 

 Highway 120 West (Groveland to Yosemite Valley: Reduce service to 1 run per day (summer only). 

 Highway 120 East (Mammoth Lakes to Yosemite Valley): Maintain service at 1 run per day 

(summer only) 

Under all the action alternatives, including Alternative 3, shuttle bus service would be improved by 

increasing the frequency of the year-round East Yosemite Valley service to 5 minute intervals during peak 

use. The Visitor Center Express service (summer only) would continue to run at 15 minute intervals. The El 

Capitan Crossover service (summer only) would continue to run at 30-minute intervals. 

TABLE 8-26: TRANSIT OPTIONS- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Regional Transit Options 

HWY 140 

Merced/Mariposa to Yosemite 

Valley 

8 runs per day (4 from Merced; 4 from Mariposa) 

 (year round) 

HWY 41 

Fresno/Oakhurst to Yosemite 

Valley 

1 run per day 

HWY 120 West 

Groveland/Sonora to Yosemite 

Valley 

1 weekday run- Sonora to Valley 

2 weekend runs- Groveland to Valley 

(summer only) 

HWY 120 East 

Inyo/Mono County (Mammoth 

Lakes) to Yosemite Valley 

1 run per day 

(summer only) 

Yosemite Valley Shuttle Options 

East Yosemite Valley 5 minute peak interval between buses 

Year round except Visitor Center direct 

Visitor Center Express 

Yosemite Valley Day-use 

Parking Area to Visitor Center 

15 min. interval between buses 

(summer only) 

El Capitan Crossover 30 min. interval between buses 

(summer only) 

West Yosemite Valley No service 

Administrative Activities 

Administrative activities would be relocated further from the river: 

 Relocate the Yosemite Lodge housekeeping and maintenance facilities to a location behind the 

Yosemite Lodge cafeteria. 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-167 

Employee Housing and Employee Parking 

Concessioner employee housing would be reduced. Compared to existing conditions, 229 fewer 

concessioner employees would be housed in Yosemite Valley. The remaining housing for 922 concessioner 

employees would be provided as follows: 

 Provide housing for 436 employees at Curry Village. 

- Retain permanent housing in the Curry Village residential area (223 employees) 

- Retain housing at Curry Village stable (49 beds). 

- Construct 16 buildings housing 164 employees. 

 Provide housing for 340 employees at Yosemite Village: 

- Retain permanent housing at Indian Creek, Lost Arrow, and Upper Tecoya (65 employees) 

- Retain Ahwahnee Row, Y Apartments, garage housing, and Hospital Row (43 employees) 

- Retain Tecoya Dorms (232 employees) 

 Provide housing for 104 employees at Yosemite Lodge: 

- Construct new housing for 104 employees at Yosemite Lodge (two structures with 26 

double-occupancy units each) 

Four group administrative campsites (up to 120 people) would be retained at the Yellow Pine 

Administrative Campground. 

Segment 3: Merced Gorge (Scenic Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

Actions to protect and enhance River Values in Segment 3 are all detailed in the section titled, “Actions 

Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-53). 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

This alternative would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today. The majority of actions 

for Alternative 3 in Segment 3 are discussed in the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-77). 

Alternative actions that are not included in the Actions Common section are listed below. 

Visitor Activities & Services 

Only private boats would be allowed in this segment for this alternative. Boaters would be allowed on the 

river below Pohono Bridge and run the river into El Portal (Segment 4). Boaters would be allowed to put in 

and take out at any of the roadside pull-outs. This use would be managed by a permit system and restricted 

to 5 boats per day. 

Transit Options 

Public transit options along this segment would be expanded as described in Segment 2, above. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-168 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Segment 4: El Portal (Scenic Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

All actions to protect and enhance river values in Segment 4 for Alternative 3 are addressed in “Actions 

Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-53). 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 3 would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today. User capacity in 

Segment 4 for Alternative 3 is mostly affected by the increase in employee housing in El Portal. While all 

new units would be built outside of the 100-year floodplain, they would fall within the river corridor 

boundary. 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Most visitor activities and services in Segment 4 are considered in “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” 

(see page 8-77). Additional actions are listed below: 

 Boating: Private boats would be allowed in Segment 4. Expected use would be mostly rafts and 

kayaks. Boaters would be permitted below Yosemite View Lodge to beyond the Foresta Bridge (at 

which point boaters would exit the segment.) Boaters would be able to use put-ins and take outs 

below the hotel, at the store/gas station and the Red Bud launch site. This use would be regulated 

through a permitting system that allows for up to 5 boats per day. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

No NPS overnight accommodations for the public are proposed in Segment 4 under any alternative. An 

expansive lodging complex is located on private land near the park boundary, but these lodging units are 

not under NPS jurisdiction. 

Visitor Day Use Capacity 

Day-use parking capacities would not change for Segment 4 in Alternative 3 (214 spaces). 

Administrative Activities 

All administrative activities in Segment 4 are considered in “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see 

page 8-53). 

Employee Housing Capacity 

In Alternative 3, high density employee housing would be added to the El Portal Village Center (12 beds) 

and Rancheria Flat (19 beds). All new units would be outside of the 100-year floodplain. These units would 

be added to accommodate for the units removed from Segment 2. 

Employee and Administrative Parking Capacity 

Most employee and administrative parking actions are discussed in “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” 

(see page 8-53). This additional housing would also include 27 employee overnight parking spots that would 

be established as a result of the additional housing units El Portal Village Center and Rancheria Flat. 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-169 

Transit Options 

Regional transit options would maintain existing service along the Highway 140 corridor. For a complete 

summary of transit activity that passes through this segment, see the Segment 2 summary above.

Segment 5: South Fork Merced River Above Wawona (Wild Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

There are no actions in Alternative 3 that are specific to this segment. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 3 would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today in Segment 5. The majority 

of actions for Alternative 3 in Segment 5 are discussed in the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see 

page 8-77). Alternative actions that are not included in the Actions Common section are listed below. 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Private boating would be allowed in this segment. Generally, use in this segment would consist of short 

floats using pack raft or other craft that can easily be carried into this remote area. Use levels would be 

unrestricted given the expected low use due to the remote nature of the river segment. 

Transit Options 

Specific transportation options for reaching Segment 5 trailheads are listed below under Segment 7. 

Segments 6 and 7: Wawona and Wawona Impoundment (Recreational Segments) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

In addition to the actions detailed in the section titled “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-

53), protection and enhancement of cultural values and water quality would be accomplished through the 

actions described below. 

Cultural Values/Water Quality 

 Wawona stock campground: Relocate stock campground (2 sites) from culturally sensitive area to 

the Wawona Stables area. 

 Wawona Campground: Retains 69 sites. Remove 27 sites that are either within the 100-year 

floodplain or in culturally sensitive areas. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 3 would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today. Notable changes to these 

segments in Alternative 3 would be the removal of the Wawona Golf Course and changes to the capacity of 

the Wawona Campground. The majority of actions for Alternative 2 in Segment 7 are discussed in the 

“Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-77). Alternative actions that are not included in the 

Actions Common section are listed below. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-170 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

Visitor Activities and Services 

 Allow only private boats in Segment 7. Expected use would be mostly kayaks and other small 

whitewater boats. Boaters would be permitted below Swinging Bridge to beyond the park line, with 

the exception of the Wawona Impoundment. Boaters would be able to use put-ins and take outs at 

Swinging Bridge, the store area, South Fork Picnic Area and below the campground. This use would 

be regulated through river patrol and monitoring as the use level is expected to be low, and 

therefore would not be limited. 

 Remove the Wawona Golf Course and ecologically restore area while retaining as a spray field for 

reclaimed water. Repurpose the Golf Shop for another use. 

 Remove the Wawona Hotel Tennis Court. 

 Eliminate commercial day rides originating from the Wawona stables. Remove the stables and 

repurpose area as a stock use campground. 

Visitor Overnight Capacity 

The Wawona Campground would be reduced from 97 to 70 sites (444 people), including a group camping 

site (to accommodate up to 30 persons). The two campsites at the Wawona stock camp would be relocated 

to the Wawona stables and would accommodate 6 people per night each (12 people per night total). Total 

overnight capacity for the Wawona Campground would be 456 people.

Total overnight capacity for Segment 7 would be 176 lodging units and campsites that accommodate 703 

people. 

Visitor Day Use Capacity 

Total visitor day use capacity for this area would be increased from 1,295 to 1,321 people at one time. This 

increase is due to new regional transit options that contribute up to 26 visitors at one time to this segment. 

Transit Options 

In-park shuttle options between Wawona and Yosemite Valley and Wawona and Mariposa Grove would 

continue. New regional transit options would be provided along the Highway 41 corridor with one run 

between Fresno and Yosemite Valley daily. Alternative 3 would have a maximum capacity of 26 visitors at 

one time arriving via regional transit. 

Segment 8: South Fork Merced River Below Wawona (Wild Segment) 

Actions to Protect and Enhance River Values 

There are no actions in Alternative 3 that are specific to this segment. 

User Capacity, Land Use and Facilities Management 

Alternative 3 would provide for similar kinds and amounts of use that exist today in Segment 8 and 

significant changes are not proposed. The majority of actions for Alternative 3 in Segment 8 are discussed in 

the “Actions Common to Alternatives 2-6” (see page 8-77). Alternative actions that are not included in the 

Actions Common section are listed below. 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-171 

Visitor Activities and Services 

Private boating would be allowed in this segment. Generally, use in this segment would consist of short 

floats using pack raft or other craft that can easily be carried into this remote area. Permits would not be 

required as the expected use level is very low. 

Transit Options 

Transit services for access to this segment are described above under Segment 7 (see above). 

Analysis of Facilities and Services 

Table 8-27 presents the park’s assessment of the particular facilities and services that would be needed to 

support public use and/or to protect river resources based on the types, levels, and locations of use 

proposed for Alternative 3. As an example, the goals of this alternative include a more dispersed visitor 

experiences and extensive riverbank Restoration. This alternative would direct comprehensive restoration 

within 150 feet of the Merced River and prescribe visitor use levels lower than current levels, therefore 

making it possible to convert the Housekeeping Camp to a day-use area and the Merced Lake High Sierra 

Camp a temporary pack stock camp. Camping and lodging would be less than today, only more dispersed 

because Yosemite Lodge would remain, as would most of the campgrounds. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-172 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-27: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 1: Wild 

Merced Lake High Sierra 

Camp 

Re-purposed as 

temporary pack camp 

Yes: This facility offers rustic accommodations to visitors traveling independently or as a part of the organized High Sierra Loop Trip offered by the concessioner in cooperation with the NPS. The number of camp beds allowed under this alternative are needed to support public use in a manner that is consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance river values. 

No: The High Sierra Camp is outside designated Wilderness; however it is surrounded by designated wilderness. Designated wilderness precludes the construction of new facilities such as this. Alternatives in Chapter 8 consider various means of addressing impacts to ORVs. 

Merced Lake Backpackers 

Camping Area 

Converted to dispersed 

camping 

No: Consistent with the land use restoration and visitor experience goals of this alternative, this designated camping is no longer needed. 

No: A designated campground reduces resource impacts from dispersed camping. Alternatives in Chapter 8 consider various mitigations for the existing campground. 

Little Yosemite Valley 

Camping Area 

Converted to dispersed 

camping 

No: Consistent with the land use restoration and visitor experience goals of this alternative, this designated camping is no longer needed. 

No: A designated campground reduces resource impacts from dispersed camping. Alternatives in Chapter 8 consider various mitigations for the existing campground. 

Moraine Dome Camping Area Converted to dispersed camping 

No: Consistent with the land use restoration and visitor experience goals of this alternative, this designated camping is no longer needed. 

No: A designated campground reduces resource impacts from dispersed camping. Alternatives in 

Chapter 8 consider various mitigations for the 

existing campground. 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds 

Upper Pines Campground Reduced 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 

Lower Pines Campground Reduced 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in 

this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 

North Pines Campground Reduced 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 

Backpackers Campground Removed (partially re- located) 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience. In addition, this campground is critical for backpackers who need to start or end their wilderness trip in Yosemite Valley. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley. 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-173 

TABLE 8-27: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds (cont.) 

Valley Campground 

Reservation Center 

Re-located (due to 

Southside Drive rerouting) 

Yes: The Valley Campground Reservation Center is an essential National Park Service point-of-contact for campers, and those who seek campsites, in Yosemite Valley. The Campground Reservation Center staff sells campsite reservations for all campsites in the park available for reservations. The Reservation Center is operated on a yearround basis. 

Yes. The Campground Reservation could be moved from its existing location. However, it is important to the successful delivery of services provided from the reservation center that any alternative location be near the Valley campgrounds. 

Housekeeping Camp Lodging 

Units 

Removed (re-purposed 

as day-use river 

access area) 

No: Under this alternative, the level of visitor accommodations is reduced and, therefore, consistent with the land-use restoration goals.

No. While some buildings within the Housekeeping Camp complex could be relocated to sites further from the Merced River, it is not feasible to consider a wholesale relocation of the lodging units. 

Housekeeping Camp Shower 

Houses and Restrooms 

Retained 1 restroom. 

Removed shower 

houses, laundry, and 

grocery. 

Yes: Public restrooms are needed in many areas throughout the river corridor to comply with public health regulations and meet the basic personal needs of visitors and employees. The public showers at Housekeeping Camp are provided for guest use as well as other patrons, including campers and hikers. 

No. The Housekeeping Camp restrooms and shower houses are components of the overnight guest accommodations at this location. They are required to be located within or very near the overnight sleeping units.

Housekeeping Camp Laundry Removed No: The public laundromat at Housekeeping Camp is not needed with the elimination of the Housekeeping Camp. 

No. This service is provided for Housekeeping 

Camp guests and is directly linked to the camp; relocating the service and providing a general laundry facility for park visitors is not necessary. 

Housekeeping Camp Grocery Removed 

No: This need for the grocery store is tied to the level of lodging units at Housekeeping Camp. With a reduction of lodging, the grocery store is not needed. 

Yes. The merchandise offered at this location is offered elsewhere in Yosemite Valley. 

Curry Village Lodging and 

Shower Houses Reduced 

Yes: Curry Village offers rustic and economy overnight guest accommodations consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs. This facility is needed to support public use by visitors who do not camp. 

No. This lodging facility is part of a National Register 

Historic District. It is not feasible to relocate the complex, including shower and toilet facilities needed by guests in without-bath accommodations, to locations outside the river corridor. 

Curry Village Overnight 

Parking Retained Yes: Parking at Curry Village is needed to support the day and overnight visitors who use Curry Village. No. Parking areas of in these locations are needed to support overnight guests at this location. 

Curry Orchard Parking Area Re-developed Yes: Parking at Curry Village Orchard is needed to support day and overnight visitors who use Curry Village. No. Parking areas of in these locations are needed to support overnight guests at this location. 

 Curry Village Raft Rental Service eliminated / facility removed No: This is not a vital visitor service under this alternative. N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

 Concessioner Stables in 

Yosemite Valley 

Reduced (as staging 

area for MLHSC pack 

stock) 

Yes: The stable operation at in Yosemite Valley supports the High Sierra Camp operations. The location of the stables is within reach of each of the High Sierra camps by one day’s ride, and trailering stock from El Portal or Wawona would be a substantial operational burden due to time and distance required to reach trailheads. 

No. There are no other suitable locations for a stable operation, neither in proximity to other visitor services nor proximity to the Valley trail system used to access the Merced Lake High Sierra Camp. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-174 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-27: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds (cont.) 

Concessioner Stables 

Employee Housing Area Retained 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate a employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance ORVs.

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Northside Drive (Stoneman 

Bridge to Yosemite Village 

Day-use Parking Area) 

 Roadway section 

removed 

No: Under this alternative this segment of Northside Drive 

through Ahwahnee Meadow is removed and therefore this bridge is not needed to support public use of the river corridor. Pedestrian, bicycle, NPS law enforcement and fire protection traffic would access the east Yosemite Valley by way of Southside Drive, which would be converted to twoway traffic. This change in traffic circulation for Yosemite Valley would be feasible due to substantial reduction in visitor use levels. 

N/A This section of roadway is removed and traffic is re-routed to Yosemite Valley destinations using nearby roadway sections. 

Southside Drive (through 

Stoneman Meadow) 

Roadway section 

removed 

No: Under this alternative this segment of Southside Drive through Stoneman Meadow is and traffic is routed through Curry Village giving pedestrians, bicycles, NPS law enforcement and fire protection access the east Yosemite Valley. This change in traffic circulation for Yosemite Valley would be feasible due to substantial reduction in visitor use 

levels. 

N/A This section of roadway is removed and traffic is re-routed to Yosemite Valley destinations using nearby roadway sections. 

Sugar Pine Bridge Removed 

No. Under this alternative this pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency vehicle bridge is not needed to support public use of the river corridor. Pedestrian, bicycle, NPS law enforcement and fire protection traffic would be re-routed north of river so that visitors can access points of interest in Yosemite Valley. Removal of this bridge will restore freeflowing conditions and riparian habitat.

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location given the circulation system for Yosemite Valley. 

 Ahwahnee Bridge Removed 

No. Under this alternative this pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency vehicle bridge is not needed to support public use of the river corridor. Pedestrian, bicycle, NPS law enforcement and fire protection traffic would be re-routed north of river so that visitors can access points of interest in Yosemite Valley. Removal of this bridge will restore freeflowing conditions and riparian habitat.

No. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location given the circulation system for Yosemite Valley. 

Stoneman Bridge Removed 

No. Under this alternative the segment of Northside Drive through Ahwahnee Meadow is removed and therefore this bridge is not needed to support public use of the river corridor. Pedestrian, bicycle, NPS law enforcement and fire protection traffic would access the east Yosemite Valley by way of Southside Drive, which would be converted to twoNo. It is not feasible to relocate the existing roadway and bridges from their present location given the circulation system for Yosemite Valley. 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-175 

TABLE 8-27: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Curry Village and Campgrounds (cont.) 

way traffic. Park visitors would be able to access points of interest in Yosemite Valley via Clark’s and Happy Isles Bridges. Removal of this bridge will restore free-flowing conditions and riparian habitat.

Upper Pines RV Loop and 

Walk-in Campground (New) Constructed 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location (adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience) could accommodate this campground in Yosemite Valley.

Segment 2: Yosemite Village and Housekeeping Camp 

Ahwahnee Row Employee 

Housing Retained 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate a 

employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance river values. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Lower Tecoya Employee 

Housing Area Retained 

Yes: Housing facilities to accommodate a portion of the workforce necessary to provide visitor services consistent with the land use restoration and visitor experience goals of this alternative. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Lost Arrow Employee Housing 

Area 

Removed and redeveloped (as 

administrative parking) 

No: Under this alternative removal of this facility is consistent with land-use restoration goals and these housing facilities are not needed given the substantial reduction of commercial services and lodging. 

No. There are no other suitable locations to move employee housing to in Yosemite Valley both in terms of size of these facilities and the need for them to be proximate to guest services to accommodate shift work schedules. 

Re-route Northside Drive 

south of Yosemite Village Dayuse Parking Area and outside 

of the 10-year floodplain 

Re-routed roadway 

Yes: This roadway serves as the exit road for all Yosemite Valley traffic. The congestion created in this vicinity is a result of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts that would be completely mitigated if no pedestrians were required to cross the road from the parking lot to access numerous visitor services including the primary visitor center, museum, and the Valley shuttle. 

No. While some changes to the exact location of the road system could be feasibly rerouted for approximately 1⁄4 mile, it could not be removed in its entirety unless a suitable replacement that would accommodate high volume visitor traffic in Yosemite Valley is identified.

Yosemite Village Day-use 

Parking Area 

Re-developed and 

expanded 

Yes: This facility will serve as the primary day-use parking lot for Yosemite Valley because it is proximate to numerous visitor services including the primary visitor center, museum, and the Valley shuttle. A day-use visitor parking area of this size is needed to support the level of public use that has been found to protect and enhance river values. 

No. While some changes to the exact location of the parking lot and road system leading to the parking lot could be feasibly relocated, the parking lot could not be removed in its entirety unless a suitable replacement that would accommodate high volume visitor parking in Yosemite Valley is identified. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-176 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-27: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Yosemite Village and Housekeeping Camp (cont.) 

Residence 1 (Superintendent’s 

House) Relocated 

Yes. This historic structure is a component of the Historic Resources ORV and would be rehabilitated and used to support the visitor experience. 

Yes. Under this alternative, the facility would no longer be a component of the Historic Resources ORV and could be relocated outside the river corridor to the lower NPS housing area.

Segment 2: Yosemite Lodge and Camp 4 Area 

Yosemite Lodge Overnight 

Units Reduced 

Yes: Yosemite Lodge offers mid-scale and economy overnight guest accommodations for visitors who do not or 

are unable to camp. The number of units allowed under this alternative are needed to support public use in a manner that is consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance ORVs.

No. While some buildings within the Yosemite Lodge complex could be relocated to sites further north of the Merced River, however, it is not feasible to consider a wholesale relocation of the complex to an alternative location.

Yosemite Lodge Overnight 

Parking Retained 

Yes: Parking is needed to support visitors who stay at 

Yosemite Lodge. Parking is also needed for park partner organizations and NPS staff who use the Lodge’s meeting and interpretive spaces (i.e., the Cliff Room, Gardner Terrace, and the outdoor amphitheater). 

No. As long as visitor services are provided at Yosemite Lodge, it will be necessary to provide parking near the Lodge complex. 

Yosemite Lodge Garden 

Terrace and Cliff Room Retained 

Yes: These areas are used for interpretive programs and for training courses, meetings, and special events. These facilities are vital to National Park Service and park partner operations. 

No. The Garden Terrace and Cliff Rooms are within the existing buildings at the Yosemite Lodge complex. The activities taking place at these locations could be considered for relocation to alternative facilities, however, it is not feasible to consider removing the buildings in their entirety. 

Yosemite Lodge Gift and 

Grocery (Convenience Shop) Reduced 

Yes: The facility provides visitors a limited range of merchandise including packaged and fresh groceries, sundries, and outdoor products frequently needed by campers and hikers. 

No. The building currently housing the Yosemite Lodge Gift and Grocery Store is part of the Yosemite Lodge food service and retail structure and would be infeasible to relocate. However, the merchandise offered for sale from this facility could be relocated to other retail outlets in Yosemite Valley if sites outside the river corridor are identified. 

Yosemite Lodge Mountain Room Bar & Food Service Retained 

Yes: Food services are necessary to support day visitors 

and those overnight visitors who are staying in lodging units without kitchenettes. 

No. The building currently housing the Mountain Room Bar is part of the Yosemite Lodge food service structure and would be infeasible to relocate. 

Yosemite Lodge Mountain 

Room Restaurant Retained 

Yes: Food services are necessary to support day visitors 

and those overnight visitors who are staying in lodging units without kitchenettes. 

No. The building currently housing the Mountain Room restaurant is part of the Yosemite Lodge food service structure and would be infeasible to relocate. However, the merchandise offered for sale from this facility could be relocated to other retail outlets in Yosemite Valley if sites outside the river corridor are identified. 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-177 

TABLE 8-27: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 2: Yosemite Lodge and Camp 4 Area (cont.) 

Yosemite Lodge Highland 

Court Employee Housing 

(Existing and New) 

Replaced with 

permanent housing 

proximate to current 

location 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to house employees who provide visitor services at the Yosemite Lodge complex that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance ORVs. Employee housing proximate to work site are vital given the demand for shift-workers and to reduce inter-Valley commuting.

No. The employees who are accommodated at this facility work at the Yosemite Lodge and need to be collocated for operational efficiencies.

Yosemite Lodge Employee 

Housing (Thousands Cabins) 

(Existing) 

Removed and 

relocated (incorporated 

into permanent 

housing above) 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to house employees who provide visitor services at the Yosemite Lodge complex that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to protect and enhance ORVs. Employee housing proximate to work site are vital given the demand for shift-workers and to reduce inter-Valley commuting.

No. The employees who are accommodated at this facility work at the Yosemite Lodge and need to be collocated for operational efficiencies.

Yosemite Lodge Day-use 

Parking Area (New) Constructed 

Yes: This facility will serve as a critical day-use parking lot for Yosemite Valley because substantial numbers of roadside parking spaces adjacent to meadows will be removed in the vicinity of the Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area. This new parking area will serve as trailhead parking for the upper and lower Yosemite Falls trail, and overflow evening parking for Camp 4 Campground. It will also be used for the Wahhoga Cultural Center. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location proximate to upper and lower Yosemite Falls trailhead, Wahhoga, Camp 4 and the Yosemite Lodge could accommodate this parking area.

Segment 2: West Yosemite Valley 

Yellow Pine Administrative Retained 

Yes: This administrative camping area is used by volunteers and researchers whose work is critical to meeting our NPS mission. 

No. No alternative areas of sufficient size or location could accommodate this campground. 

Segment 4: El Portal 

Rancheria Employee Housing 

Area (New) Constructed 

Yes: This housing facility is necessary to accommodate employees who provide visitor services that are consistent with the types and amounts of visitor use that have been found to be protect and enhance ORVs, and to accommodate employees who provide resource protection services consistent with the mission of the National Park Service and current agency management policies.

No. In-fill employee housing should occur within existing employee housing areas

El Portal Remote Parking at 

Abbieville / Trailer Village 

(New) 

Constructed 

Yes: This parking area will provide a vital queuing and staging area during peak use periods when congestion in the East Yosemite Valley reaches conditions whereby the National park Service would not permit more vehicles to add to the crowding. Day-use visitors would be provided shuttle service to Yosemite Valley from this location. 

No. There are no other suitable locations proximate with direct access to Highway 140 before entering Yosemite National Park boundary. 
ALTERNATIVES

8-178 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

TABLE 8-27: NECESSITY OF MAJOR PUBLIC-USE FACILITIES AND SERVICES- ALTERNATIVE 3 

Site Planning Area Action Justification: Is the Facility Needed for Public Use or Resource Protection? Feasibility: If facility or services is necessary, is it feasible to relocate outside of the river corridor? 

Segment 5 (Wild), Segments 6 & 7 (Recreational), Segment 8 (Wild) 

Wawona Campground Reduced 

Yes: Camping is a component of the recreational ORV in 

this segment. Campgrounds are necessary to provide overnight opportunities that connect visitors with a direct outdoor experience. 

No. This campground could not be relocated as no suitable alternative site exists in the Wawona proper adjacent to the river, which is an integral part of the camping experience. 

Wawona Hotel Tennis Court Removed 

No: Opportunities for this type of visitor recreation is not 

considered a vital visitor service given the land use and visitor experience goals under this alternative. 

N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

Wawona Hotel Golf Course & 

Shop Removed 

No: Opportunities for this type of visitor recreation is not 

considered a vital visitor service given the land use and 

visitor experience goals under this alternative. 

N/A: This service will be eliminated. 

Wawona Stables Retained 

Yes: The need for the Wawona Stables infrastructure is driven, in part, by commercial day rides, which are eliminated. 

No. The stable operates from a historic structure that could not be feasibly relocated. 

Wawona Commercial 

Horseback Day Rides Service eliminated 

No: Opportunities for this type of visitor recreation is not considered a vital visitor service given the land use and 

visitor experience goals under this alternative. 

N/A: This service will be eliminated. 
Alternative 3: Dispersed Visitor Experience And Extensive Riverbank Restoration 

Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 8-179 

Conceptual Site Drawings 

Boys Town 

In Alternative 3, Southside Drive would be re-routed around Stoneman Meadow, all of the Boys Town 

cabins and facilities removed, and the area restored to natural conditions. The Curry Orchard Day-use 

Parking Area would be partially restored to facilitate Stoneman Meadow restoration while retaining 

approximately 300 parking spaces. 

Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area 

In Alternative 3, the existing 6-acre Yosemite Village Day-use Parking Area and all associated roadway 

improvements would be moved outside of the 10-year floodplain of the river to facilitate riparian 

restoration goals and to prevent further resource damage. Restoration actions would remove non-native fill 

material, re-contour the topography, and plant native vegetation. The redesigned parking area would be 

formalized to provide a total of 550 parking spaces. Northside Drive would be realigned to the south edge of 

the parking area where it would connect with Sentinel Drive and continue west to Yosemite Falls and park 

exits. Consolidating the parking to the north of Northside Drive, with new and improved walkways to 

Yosemite Village, would eliminate vehicle and pedestrian conflicts. A new bus passenger unloading area 

would be established east of the Village market and five new spaces provided for bus parking. The 

Concessioner General Office, Concessioner Garage, Arts and Activities Center (former bank building) 

would be removed, while the Village Sport Shop would be repurposed as a visitor contact station. 

The area of disturbance for improvements at Camp 6 in Alternative 2 would cover approximately 22 acres 

and include 14 acres of clearing and grubbing, 1.2 acres for existing building removal, 1,000 square feet for 

the new restroom, 5.4 acres of pavement removal, 1.7 acres of new roadway, 2.4 acres for new parking, 

14,900 square feet of utility service trenching, and 38,000 square feet for new pedestrian pathways. 

Construction staging would cover an area of approximately 2 acres. 

Yosemite Lodge Parking Area 

In Alternative 3, the area west of Yosemite Lodge, currently used as parking for tour buses, transit buses and 

for overnight guests, would be re-developed to provide 150 day-use parking spaces, parking for 15 buses, a 

new 3,000 square foot comfort station and a re-located shuttle stop. The existing tour bus drop off area 

would be relocated to the Highland Court area. The wellness center, linen storage and laundry buildings 

would be removed. Ground disturbance within a 11.2 acre footprint west of the Lodge would include 8.6 

acres of clearing and grubbing, 55,850 square feet of existing building and pavement removal, 3,000 square 

feet for the new comfort station and shuttle stop, 13,300 square feet of utility service trenching, 2.5 acres for 

parking, and 2,500 square feet for pedestrian pathways. Construction staging would take place over a 2 acre 

area within the existing footprint. Existing vegetation would be retained to separate and screen parking bays 

while bioswales would serve to filter and treat storm water run-off. 

Yosemite Lodge Housing 

In Alternative 3, the temporary modular housing at Highland Court, and the Thousand Cabins would be 

removed and replaced with two new buildings to house 104 concessioner employees. In addition, a new 

parking area would provide 78 employee parking spaces, parking for 3 shuttle buses, and 53 day-use parking 
ALTERNATIVES

8-180 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 

spaces for the public. Ground disturbance for the two housing sites would cover a total of 7.4 acres and 

would include 45,500 square feet of preparation for the new buildings, 5,500 square feet of utility service 

trenching, and 1.8 acres for parking. 

 
*These drawings are provided to demonstrate where facilities would be removed, relocated, or constructed according to actions more fully described by project alternatives. The drawings 

 do not represent a final proposal. More detailed design and construction documents would be developed consistent with the general concepts presented here.

Huff House Employee Housing

Replace temporary housing with permanent facilities, 

164 beds and 164 parking spaces

Construct 4 two-story buildings for 32 occupants, 8 occupants per building.

Construct 11 two-story buildings for 132 occupants, 12 occupants per building.

Provide common recreational area, approximately 3,600 square feet.

Build plaza areas and walkways with site furnishings, accent paving, and 

enhanced landscaping.

Construct a shuttle bus stop.

Remove ice rink and bicycle rentals. Construct an employee parking facility with 

164 spaces.

Retain historic residence for housing purposes.

Improve parking area with 300 spaces and landscape buffers w

will treat storm water run-off. Provide pedestrian walkways.

Remove Stoneman Road and adjacent recreation trail. Extend b

terminus (at Stoneman Road) to Curry Village Pavilion area, imp

invasive species, promote weed control and plant native species

Curry Orchard Parking Area

Stoneman Meadow Restoration

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2 1

3

4

5

6

7

10

12

8

9

13

14

15
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
*These drawings are provided to demonstrate where facilities would be removed, relocated, or constructed according to actions more fully described by project alternatives. 

 The drawings do not represent a final proposal. More detailed design and construction documents would be developed consistent with the general concepts presented here.

8

9

9

2

2

1

3

3

3

4

5

5

6

7
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
NORTH

* These drawings are provided to demonstrate where facilities would be removed, relocated, or constructed according to actions more fully described by project alternatives. 

 The drawings do not represent a final proposal. More detailed design and construction documents would be developed consistent with the general concepts presented here.

 Alternative 3

 Conceptual Site Drawing for

 Yosemite Lodge and Camp 4

Yosemite National Park

United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service

Move pedestrian crossing to Yosemite Falls west of the existing intersection.Maintain parking for overnight guests.Enhance pedestrian circulation system.Construct tour bus loading and unloading area, with shelter.

Construct employee housing in 2 two-story buildings with 52 occupants per building and 39 employee parking spaces per building.Relocate linen storage and laundry buildings to an 

loading and unloading area.vegetation and hydrological processes.

Construct 150 day-use parking spaces at Yosemite Lodge Day-use Parking Area. Maintain existing vegetation as buffers to separate and screen parking bays, provide pedestrian pathways and bioswales that will retain storm water run-off.Construct 15 tour bus parking spaces.Construct a shuttle bus stop with shelter and comfort station.Construct 41 additional parking spaces at Camp 4.

Retain 35 existing walk-in campsites at Camp 4. Construct 35 additional walk-in sites opposite existing parking facility. Occupancy is limited to 6 campers per site. Standard walk-in campsite is 3,850 square feet (70-foot diameter), including 1,200 square feet of clearance with a 15-foot perimeter buffer.Protect and enhance a 150-foot riparian buffer.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK