alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stanley Wieczorek, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on tlic law and facts and in the interests of justice atnl a new trial granted. Memorandum: The judgment of conviction depends in large part upon certain articles of personal property received in evidence, some of which were obtained from the defendant’s home prior to arrest and some of which were taken from the defendant’s wife’s car after the arrest, all without a search warrant. It is claimed by the People that these exhibits were seized as incidents to a lawful arrest without a warrant of arrest. The record does not support this claim. Just when the defendant was arrested is uncertain, but it is definite that at least one of these articles was seized before the arrest and that the arrest was made as the result of the search and not prior thereto. This was a violation of defendant’s constitutional rights *(People*v. *Moore,*11 N Y 2d 271). As to the articles taken from defendant’s wife’s car, it is clear that they were seen by the officers during the unlawful search of defendant’s home. Later, when the officers received knowledge that they may have been connected with one of the crimes charged, they were taken from the car. None of these articles was properly admitted in evidence *(People*v. *Rodriguez,*11 N Y 2d 279). The elements of the crime of burglary, particularly the element of intent, were not well defined in the court’s charge *(People*v. *Katz,*290 N. Y. 361); and in relation to the People’s claim of larceny the court, in effect, charged that if it was found that either the defendant-appellant or the codefendant entered the premises in question the jury would have to find the defendant guilty of larceny, leaving only the degree of larceny in doubt. There were other errors. Because of the effect of the sum total of all of this, the judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted in the interests of justice. It may be that the defendant will be advised to attack the search and seizure on preliminary proceedings under the newly enacted sections 813-e, 813-d, 813-e of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court convicting defendant of burglary, third degree, grand larceny, second degree and petit larceny.) Present•—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman and Henry, JJ.
570.402-1 General. ( a ) If a succeeding lease for the continued occupancy of space in a building does not exceed the simplified lease acquisition threshold, the contracting officer may use the simplified procedures in 570.2. Explain the absence of competition in the contract file.
( b ) If a succeeding lease will exceed the simplified lease acquisition threshold, the contracting officer may enter into the lease under either of the following conditions: ( 1 ) The contracting officer does not identify any potential acceptable locations.
( 2 ) The contracting officer identifies potential acceptable locations, but a cost-benefit analysis indicates that award to an offeror other than the present lessor will result in substantial relocation costs or duplication of costs to the Government, and the Government cannot expect to recover such costs through competition.
[76 FR 30852, May 27, 2011]
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed July 7, 2016.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-00021-CV

JEREMIAH O'KEEFFE, Appellant

V.

NORTHSTAR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-02734-2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Stoddart, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Stoddart

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated May 3, 2016, we notified 

appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file his brief and an 

extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an 

extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the 

Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (1), 42.3(b) (c).

160021F.P05

/Craig Stoddart/

CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JEREMIAH O'KEEFFE, Appellant

No. 05-16-00021-CV V.

NORTHSTAR PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 7, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-02734-2015.

Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. 

Justices Myers and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee NORTHSTAR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT recover its 

costs of this appeal from appellant JEREMIAH O'KEEFFE.

Judgment entered this 7th day of July, 2016.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  January 22, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

President (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                      |  |                             |  |                             
|------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                    |  | Jurisdiction ofOrganization |  | Percent of CommonStock Owned
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Bank, N.A.                     |  | United States               |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Investment Group, N.A.         |  | United States               |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Consumer Finance Company, Inc. |  | Nevada                      |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Capital Trust I                |  | Delaware                    |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|ARP Holdings, LLC                     |  | Delaware                    |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AFI Nevada, Inc.                      |  | Nevada                      |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|Property Exchange Company             |  | Illinois                    |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Investment Services, Inc.      |  | Illinois                    |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Real Properties, LLC           |  | Delaware                    |  | 100%
Withlacoochee River (Group 4) - Verified ListHydrologic Unit: WithlacoocheeOGC CaseNumber Planning Unit WBID Water SegmentWaterbodyTypeWaterbodyClass11998 303(d)Parameters ofConcernParametersAssessed Usingthe ImpairedWaters Rule(IWR)ConcentrationsCausingImpairment2Priority for TMDLDevelopment3Projected Year ForTMDLDevelopment3CommentPP=Planning Period VP=Verified Period4(# Exceedances/# Samples)06-0338LakePanasoffkee1351BLAKEPANASOFFKEELAKE 3FDissolvedOxygen < 5.0 mg/LMedium 2011PP = 21 / 123; VP = 42 / 180 Verified impaired.Nutrients were identified as a causative pollutant basedon chlorophyll data/nutrient impairment verification. Colimited by nitrogen and phosphorus.06-0339LakePanasoffkee1351BLAKEPANASOFFKEELAKE 3FNutrients (TSIand Historic TSI)TN = 1.20 mg/LTP= 0.052 mg/LMedium 2011PP = Potentially impaired; VP = Verified impaired 1TSI mean exceeded the threshold of 40 in 2001. TSImean was >40 (45.9) and color <40 (32.6). 1 TSImean exceeded the threshold of 60 in 2003 [62-303.352(1)]. TSI mean was >60 (60.3) and color >40(111) in 2003 [62-303.352(2)]. The historic TSI value(of 43.2 for the years 1989-1993) was exceeded bymore than 10 units in 2002 (57.1) and 2003 (60.3). Colimited by nitrogen and phosphorus based on a medianTN/TP ratio of 29.3.06-0340UpperWithlacoochee1467MUD LAKELAKE 3F Nutrients (TSI)TN = 1.54 mg/LTP = 0.10 mg/LMedium 2011PP = Potentially impaired; VP = Verified impaired. 1TSI mean of 65.4 exceeded the threshold of 60 in2002. 39 TN values, median 1.53 mg/l, 60 TP values,median 0.074 mg/l. 20 BOD values, median 1.55 mg/l.Co-limited by nitrogen and phosphorus based on amedian TN/TP ratio of 23.67.1Florida's waterbody classifications are defined as:1- Potable water supplies,2- Shellfish propagation or harvesting,3F- Recreation, propagation, and maintenance of a healthy, well-balancedpopulation of fish and wildlifein fresh water,3M- Recreation, propagation, and maintenance of a healthy, well-balanced population of fish and wildlife in marine water,4- Agricultural water supplies, 5 - Navigation, utility, and industrial use.2The nutrient concentrations represent the 75th percentiles of data from the Verified Period. The target nutrient concentration used in the subsequent TMDL will be determined during the TMDL process.3Priorities and schedule for TMDL development are only provided for waters in Category 5. Priorities set under the EPA Consent Decree were retained. Medium priority is used for newly listed waters identified under the IWR.4Planning Period (PP) - 1/1/1993 to 12/31/2002; Verified Period (VP) - 1/1/1998 to 6/30/2005.The Group 4 Withlacoochee River Basin's Verified List is based on IWR Run 22.February 15, 20061 of 1 Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Colorectal Cancer Screening Saves Lives

Know Before You Go

Screening for colorectal cancer is recommended for men and women 

beginning at age 50. 

National guidelines for colorectal cancer screening include several 

screening test options. 

Recommended screening tests are: 

l Colonoscopy (once every 10 years)

l High-Sensitivity Fecal Occult Blood Test, also known as a Stool Test 

(once a year) 

l Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (every 5 years) 

The benefits and risks of these screening methods vary. Discuss with your 

doctor which test is best for you. And check with your insurance provider 

to find out which tests are covered by your insurance plan, and how much 

you will have to pay. 

Getting screened could save your life!

Questions to Ask Your Doctor 

Do I need to get a screening test for colorectal cancer? 

l What screening test(s) do you recommend for me? 

l How do I prepare? Do I need to change my diet or my usual 

medication schedule? 
l What’s involved in the test? Will it be uncomfortable or painful? 

Is there any risk involved? When and from whom will I get results?

l If you’re having a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy you will want to know: 

Who will do the exam? Will I need someone with me? 

If you’re at increased risk: Some people are at increased risk because 

they have inflammatory bowel disease, a personal or family history of 

colorectal polyps or colorectal cancer, or genetic syndromes like familial 

adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal 

cancer (also known as Lynch syndrome). These people may need to start 

screening earlier than age 50. If you believe you are at increased risk, 

ask your doctor if you should begin screening earlier than age 50.

If you’re having symptoms: Tell your doctor if you have any of 

these symptoms: 

l Blood in or on your stool (bowel movement).

l Stomach pain, aches, or cramps that do not go away

l Losing weight and you don’t know why.

These symptoms may be caused by something other than cancer, 

but the only way to know what is causing them is to speak with your 

doctor about them. 

For more information, please call 1-800-CDC-INFO 

(1-800-232-4636) or visit www.cdc.gov/screenforlife

CDC Publication #21-1029 • August 2009
(February 8, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Kirkland, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on May 26, 1977, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Although afforded an ample opportunity to *855file a supplemental brief, appellant has failed to do so. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Evans, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10128 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10128

To authorize grants to be made on an equitable basis to highest courts 
    to assess and improve the handling of foster care and adoption 
                  proceedings, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2024

Mr. Sablan (for himself and Mr. Moylan) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize grants to be made on an equitable basis to highest courts 
    to assess and improve the handling of foster care and adoption 
                  proceedings, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Court Improvement Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF COURT IMPROVEMENT GRANTS TO HIGHEST 
              COURTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 438(c) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 629h(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Certain jurisdictions.--
                    ``(A) In general.--From the amounts reserved under 
                section 436(b)(2) for a fiscal year, the Secretary 
                shall, before applying paragraph (1) of this 
                subsection, allocate the dollar amount set forth in 
                paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection for a grant to the 
                highest court of each State that applies therefor and 
                does not operate a program under part E.
                    ``(B) Use of funds.--A highest court to which a 
                grant is made under this paragraph shall use the grant, 
                consistent with subsection (a), to assess and make 
                improvements to court processes and proceedings 
                relating to child safety, permanency, and well-being.
                    ``(C) State defined.--In subparagraph (A), the term 
                `State' means Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern 
                Mariana Islands.
                    ``(D) Authority to request expenditure 
                information.--On request of the Secretary, an entity to 
                which a grant is made under this paragraph shall 
                provide the Secretary with such information about the 
                expenditure of the grant as the Secretary may 
                request.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 438(c)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
629h(c)(2)) is amended by striking ``(1)(A) and (3)'' and inserting 
``(1)(A), (3), and (4)(A)''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000020469
<NAME> UNITED MAGAZINE COMPANY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-05-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                       4,500,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               52,000,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,000,000
<INVENTORY>                                 21,800,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            76,300,000
<PP&E>                                      15,800,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,900,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             200,500,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      204,000,000
<BONDS>                                     62,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   117,700,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (192,900,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               200,500,000
<SALES>                                     65,400,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,400,000
<CGS>                                       14,900,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,700,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,300,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,100,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,200,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,200,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,200,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.96)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             332
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (71)
<INVENTORY>                                        179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,631
<PP&E>                                          16,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,559
<BONDS>                                          2,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           253
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,967
<SALES>                                          5,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,057
<CGS>                                            4,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    234
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                113
<DISCONTINUED>                                      24
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       137
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
#### 436.670 Firms ineligible for award—construction.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.236-80, Firms Ineligible For Award—Construction, in the contract for architect-engineering services except as provided in FAR 36.209 and AGAR 436.209.