alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Coffee Exchange, Inc. (the "Registrant")
on Form  10-KSB  for the  year  ending  September  30,  2008 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Carl
Olivieri,  Principal  Financial Officer of the Registrant,  certity to the of my
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Registrant.

Date: January 7, 2009


By: /s/ Carl Olivieri
---------------------
Carl Olivieri
Principal Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           CDC Data on Rates of Autism Spectrum Disorder      

# CDC Data on Rates of Autism Spectrum Disorder

This report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that 1 in 88 children in the United States has been identified as having an autism spectrum disorder and more children are being diagnosed by age 3. 

http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2012/p0329_autism_disorder.html
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Voices for Hope, Young Adult Parenting      

# Voices for Hope, Young Adult Parenting

Research and Training Center on Pathways to Positive Futures (RTC 4 Pathways)

This webpage provides advice and resources for pregnant and parenting youth who have a mental health condition.

Behavioral health (mental health and substance abuse)

Parenting supports

Pregnant and parenting youth

Youth

Webpage

http://www.voices4hope.net/parenting.html
#### In the Matter of George Hom, Appellant, v Jane Zullo, Respondent.

[775 NYS2d 886]

a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), dated May 20, 2003, which denied his petition, inter alia, for a change of custody of the parties’ daughter.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s petition for a change of custody since he did not make an evidentiary showing which would warrant a change of custody *(see generally Matter of Coutsoukis v Samora,*265 AD2d 482 [1999]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITA BRISBON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 72 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2017, the Motion for Appointment of Counsel 

is DENIED.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

2
GREEAR BRANCH

| Sebastian(?) coal bed

1
NORTH OF MIZE

E

ta, BARKER
Reg BRANCH
Ease _of Morse |

83°2230" 83°2000" 83°17'30" 83°15'00"
37°5230" 37°52" 30"
u
ee
3.
37°50'00" 37°80'00"
Gy
37°47°30" 37°47'30"
S
1 9 2Mies 7,
37°45'00" 37°45'00"
83°22'30" 83°20'00" 83°17 20°\ 83°15'00"

INDEX MAP OF CANNEL CITY QUADRANGLE
SHOWING LOCATION OF SECTIONS

5
STACY FORK

4
WALTERS FORK

J

HEAD OF STONE
COAL FORK

6
LOWER PART OF
STONE COAL FORK

Kendrick shale
of Jillson

limestone of White

Sess 0a bed

BULLETIN 1020 PLATE 2

8
HEAD OF STATE
ROAD FORK

Flint clay bed

Car

f SPE City coal bed |

LOCATIONS OF SECTIONS
1. Section along rural road at head of branch of Grassy Creek
4 mile north of Mize post office
2. Section along U. S. Highway 460 on Greear Branch

3. Composite section of exposures in stream cuts and prospects along
Barker Branch

4. Section of exposures 3s mile up Walters Fork

5. Section along rural road on north side of ridge between Stacy and
‘Stone Coal Forks

6. Section along State Highway 191 on lower part of Stone Coal Fork

7. Section along State Highway 191 at the head of Stone Coal Fork

B. Section along State Highway 134 at the head of State Road Fork

EXPLANATION

Coal

Cannel coal

Cannel shale

Black shale

Calcareous shale

Marine fossils

L_]

Concealed

SECTIONS AND CORRELATIONS OF THE BREATHITT FORMATION IN THE CANNEL CITY QUADRANGLE,
MORGAN, WOLFE, AND MAGOFFIN COUNTIES, KENTUCKY

308202 © - 55 - No. 1 (In pocket )
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Public and Indian Housing      

# Public and Indian Housing

The role of the Office of Public and Indian Housing is to ensure safe, decent, and affordable housing; create opportunities for residents' self-sufficiency and economic independence; and assure fiscal integrity by all program participants.

http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/program_offices/public_indian_housing
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maria Barbera, Appellant.

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 3, 1976, affirmed. No opinion. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Mangano, JJ., concur.
637.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.237-70, Compensatory Time Off, in personal services contracts awarded in support of International Narcotics Control programs overseas, if the contracting officer determines its use appropriate.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 652.237-72, Observance of Legal Holidays and Administrative Leave, in all solicitations and contracts where contractor personnel will be working on-site in any Department of State facility. Overseas contracting activities may add local holidays to the list included in paragraph (a) of the clause.
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 652.237-73, Statement of Qualifications for Preference as a U.S. Person, in all overseas local guard solicitations.
[59 FR 66766, Dec. 28, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 43629, Aug. 11, 1999; 69 FR 19337, Apr. 13, 2004; 76 FR 20250, Apr. 12, 2011]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Karl M. Kotasek, Appellant, v. John M. Perhach, as Sheriff of the County of Broome, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. It seems to be agreed that the sole question presented is whether or not a County Court may, in its appellate capacity, remand a prisoner to a Special Sessions Court for resentencing after setting aside an illegal sentence. In 1953 section 764-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure was enacted by the Legislature to provide that a Court of Special Sessions may correct an illegal sentence at any time and may continue for such purpose. The petitioner does not deny that the County Court had the power to vacate the illegal sentence and does not allege that the County Court did not impose a lawful sentence, but rather, rests on the assumption that “ the second sentence imposed by the special sessions court, under which your petitioner is now being detained, is void for want of jurisdiction of the matter by the sentencing court.” This contention must fail since the Court of Special Sessions has continuing jurisdiction and therefore, the petitioner has no basis for claiming that the second sentence is illegal in a habeas corpus proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
570.402-5 Potential acceptable locations. If the contracting officer identifies potential acceptable locations through the advertisement or market survey, conduct a cost-benefit analysis following the procedures in 570.402-6. Based on the results of the cost-benefit analysis, take appropriate action as follows: ( a ) If the cost-benefit analysis indicates that the Government will recover relocation costs and duplication of costs through competition, develop an SFO and negotiate with all interested parties following 570.3.
( b ) If the cost-benefit analysis indicates that the Government cannot expect to recover relocation costs and duplication of costs through competition, prepare a justification for approval in accordance with FAR 6.3 and 506.3. Explain both: ( 1 ) How the contracting officer performed the cost-benefit analysis.
( 2 ) That the cost-benefit analysis indicates that award to any other offeror will likely result in substantial costs to the Government that the Government cannot expect to recover through competition.
[64 FR 37265, July 9, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 30852, May 27, 2011]
#### Clara Sheldon, Respondent, v Robert Sheldon, Appellant.

Order and judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered December 7, 1977, which, *inter alia,*denied defendant’s motion to disaffirm the report of the Special Referee and granted plaintiffs cross motion to confirm the report, and which modified the judgment of divorce by awarding to plaintiff the reduced sum of $90 weekly support, and awarded counsel fees of $1,500, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of granting in part defendant’s motion to disaffirm the report of the Special Referee by directing that alimony be provided in the sum of $100 per week for the *854plaintiff, effective as of the date of the order to be entered hereon, and by deleting from the judgment of divorce the provision that defendant maintain the former marital apartment for plaintiff; the award of counsel fees in the sum of $1,500 shall include the services rendered on this appeal, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and disbursements. The' parties were divorced in February, 1973, defendant being directed to pay $150 per week as alimony and support for the parties’ two infant children, both 18 years of age. Plaintiff was also awarded sole possession of the marital apartment, title to which was in the defendant, rent-free, until such time as she may remarry. After these two children reached their majority, defendant moved for a reduction in support and for possession of the apartment on the ground of substantial change in circumstances. Plaintiff cross-moved for an increase in support. Absent unusual circumstances (not here present), there is no obligation to support a child after he attains his majority. Further, it appears that plaintiff is gainfully employed and her ability to be self-supporting is relevant in determining the amount of support the defendant is to provide. Plaintiff, *the only one*now required to be supported, does not have an unfettered right to, and has not demonstrated a need for, the four-bedroom former marital apartment. Defendant, the sole owner, has sold the property. However, defendant is required to provide an adequate amount for r.ental and other support consonant with the parties’ income, plaintiff’s needs and the previous standard of living (see *Kover v Kover,*29 NY2d 408, 415-416; *Morgan v Morgan,*52 AD2d 804; *Dubno v Dubno,*51 AD2d 693; *Weltz v Weltz,*35 AD2d 208). After study of the record, it is concluded that a fair balance of the equities requires that the defendant pay to plaintiff the sum of $100 per week as and for her support and that the provisions for maintenance of the marital apartment be vacated. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is modified to the extent that prospectively the sum of $100 per week alimony be awarded to plaintiff, effective as of the date of the order to be entered hereon. Concur—Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Lane, Lupiano and Silverman, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Childhood Trauma and Its Effect on Healthy Development      

# Childhood Trauma and Its Effect on Healthy Development

This article from the National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention discusses the prevalence of trauma and its effect on children and teens, with the goal of providing schools, parents, and caregivers with the tools to identify young people who may have been affected by trauma in order to help them develop the skills they need to succeed.

http://justice.aksummit.com/PDF/081712_childhood_trauma.pdf
#### In the Matter of William Maidman, Appellant, v. Central Foundry Company, Respondent.

Order entered March 24, 1967, denying petition reversed on the law and the facts and as a matter of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant, and petition granted to the extent of allowing petitioner to obtain print-outs and daily transfer lists from the respondent’s transfer agent on his paying for the same. Petitioner is a director and stockholder of defendant corporation. As such he has an absolute right to inspect *924any book or record of the corporation *(Matter of Cohen*v. *Cocoline Prods.,*309 N. Y. 119). He has already received a list of stockholders. However, the stock of the company is actively traded in and the list changes daily. The company receives the results of this trading from its transfer agent by "way of what are called “print-outs” and daily transfer sheets. The transfer agent is equipped to supply additional copies of these reports, but defendant has directed it not to supply plaintiff. In his official capacity plaintiff would be entitled to examine these papers as soon as received by the corporation. As long as the facilities for supplying him directly exist, and as he is willing to pay for them, there is no valid reason why he should not receive them direijtly. Concur—Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer, Capozzoli and MeGivern, JJ.
#### HOLMES, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. H. R. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, ¡pellate Division, Fourth Department.

March , 1906.)

Action by Mary L. Holmes, as, etc., ainst the New York Central & Hudson River lilroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment aimed, with costs.
#### 652.242-70 Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).

As prescribed in 642.272(a), insert a clause substantially the same as follows:

# Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) (AUG 1999)

(a) The Contracting Officer may designate in writing one or more Government employees, by name and position title, to take action for the Contracting Officer under this contract. Each designee shall be identified as a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR). Such designation(s) shall specify the scope and limitations of the authority so delegated; provided, that the designee shall not change the terms or conditions of the contract, unless the COR is a warranted Contracting Officer and this authority is delegated in the designation.

(b) The COR is [insert job title of COR].

(End of clause)

[53 FR 26177, July 11, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 66772, Dec. 28, 1994; 64 FR 43634, Aug. 11, 1999; 69 FR 19345, Apr. 13, 2004]
Order filed August 20, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00269-CV

____________

SONYA CHANDLER-ANDERSON, Appellant

V.

CHERYRL BEAUSOLEIL AND SUPERIOR GERIATRIC SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-16868

ORDER

This court issued its opinion and judgment in this case on July 18, 2013. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 49.1 provides for the filing of a motion for 

rehearing within fifteen days after a court of appeals’ judgment or order is 

rendered. Tex. R. App. Proc. 49.1. Appellant filed a motion for rehearing on 

August 15, 2013, more than 15 days after this court’s judgment was rendered. 

“A court of appeals may extend the time for filing a motion for rehearing or 

en banc reconsideration if a party files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) no 
later than 15 days after the last date for filing the motion.” Tex. R. App. P. 49.8. A 

party seeking an extension of time in the court of appeals is required to file a 

motion specifically stating the facts that reasonably explain the need for an 

extension. Rios v. Calhoon, 889 S.W.2d 257, 259 (Tex. 1994); see also Tex. R.

App. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C) (requiring motion to extend time to include facts relied on to 

reasonably explain the need for an extension). No motion for extension of time was 

filed in this case, however. 

Accordingly, unless appellant files with the clerk of this court a motion that 

complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b)(1) and provides a 

reasonable explanation for the late filing of the party’s motion for rehearing within 

10 days of the date of this order, the court will deny the motion for rehearing as 

untimely.

PER CURIAM