### 18502 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices

TABLE 

### 3—B US 

### E FFICIENCY 

### E NHANCEMENTS 

### R ESEARCH AND 

### D EMONSTRATIONS 

### P ROJECT 

### S ELECTIONS

### —Continued

Project ID State Project

sponsor Transit agency partner Project description Amount

D2015–BERD–004 ....... GA .. Center forTransportation and

the Environment (CTE). Metropolitan AtlantaRapid Transit Authority (MARTA), Atlanta,
GA. Center for Transportation and the Environment (CTE), in partnership with the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA), will receive funding to develop and demonstrate a BAE Systems prototype Reduced Engine Idle Load System. This first-of-its-kind effort will bring a multimode, electric accessory ‘power plant’ to market. $976,030

D2015–BERD–005 ....... MD Maryland

Transit Administration (MTA), MD. Maryland Transit Administration (MTA), Baltimore, MD. The Maryland Transit Administration will receive funding to develop and demonstrate a retrofitof 35 hybrid buses with a hybrid beltless alternator and support equipment to monitor fuel savings and impact on house batteries. $495,621

D2015–BERD–001 ....... MI ... American Seating. The Rapid, Grand Rapids, MI. American Seating, in partnership with The Rapid in Grand Rapids, Michigan, will receive funding to develop and demonstrate a heated and cooled seat, which is intended to reducefuel consumption of public transportation vehicles. $298,906

D2015–BERD–003 ....... UT .. Center forTransportation and

the Environment (CTE). Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Salt Lake City, UT. Center for Transportation and the Environment (CTE), in partnership with the Utah TransitAuthority (UTA), will receive funding to develop and demonstrate a system that will eliminate or reduce idling during paratransitpassenger loading operations, lowering operating costs, reducing energy usage, and improving air quality. $697,185

Total ...................... ........ ....................... ...................................... ............................................................................. $3,000,000

[FR Doc. 2015–07825 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–57–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Surface Transportation Board**

**[Docket No. AB 290 (Sub-No. 365X)]**

**Norfolk Southern Railway Company—**
**Discontinuance of Service Exemption—in Chicago, Cook County,** 

**Ill.**

On March 17, 2015, Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) filed with the Surface Transportation Board (Board) a petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for exemption from the provisions of 49
U.S.C. 10903 to discontinue rail service over approximately 1.5 miles of rail line between milepost KN 4.0 and milepost KN 5.5, located on NSR’s LeMoyne Industrial Track in Chicago, Cook County, Ill. The line includes no
stations and traverses U.S. Postal Service Zip Code 60632.

NSR states that the line does notcontain any federally granted rights-ofway. Any documentation in NSR’s possession will be made available promptly to those requesting it.

The interest of railroad employees will be protected by the conditions set
forth in Oregon Short Line Railroad—
Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch Between Firth & Ammon, in Bingham & Bonneville Counties, Idaho , 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979).

By issuance of this notice, the Board is instituting an exemption proceeding pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502(b). A final decision will be issued by July 2, 2015.

Because this is a discontinuance proceeding and not an abandonment proceeding, trail use/rail banking and public use conditions are not appropriate.

Any offer of financial assistance (OFA) under 49 CFR 1152.27(b)(2) to
subsidize continued rail service will be due no later than July 15, 2015, or 10 days after service of a decision granting the petition for exemption, whichever
occurs sooner. Each offer must be accompanied by a $1,600 filing fee. See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).

All filings in response to this noticemust refer to Docket No. AB 290 (SubNo. 365X) and must be sent to: (1) Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20423– 0001; and (2) William A. Mullins, Baker & Miller PLLC, 2401 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20037. Replies to the petition are due on or before April 27, 2015.

Persons seeking further information concerning discontinuance procedures may contact the Board’s Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245–0238 or refer
to the full abandonment and discontinuance regulations at 49 CFR 1152. Questions concerning environmental issues may be directed to
the Board’s Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA) at (202) 245–0305. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 800–877–8339.]

Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at

‘‘ WWW.STB.DOT.GOV .’’

Decided: March 30, 2015. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.
Brendetta S. Jones,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2015–07785 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4915–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Docket No. DOT–OST–2015–0061]**

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Renewed Approval of** 
**Information Collection**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Secretary (OST),

DOT.


### 18503 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for

comments.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Transportation (DOT) invites public comments on our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval to reinstate a previously approved Information Collection Request (OMB Control Number 2105–0563) in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,

44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ).

The previous approval granted the Department of Transportation authority to collect information involving
National Infrastructure Investments or ‘‘TIGER’’ Discretionary Grants pursuant to Title I of the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for 2010 (the ‘‘FY 2010 Appropriations Act’’). The Office of the Secretary of Transportation (‘‘OST’’) is referring to these grants as ‘‘TIGER Discretionary Grants.’’ The original collection of information was necessary in order to receive applications for grant funds pursuant to the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2010 (‘‘FY 2010 Appropriations Act’’), Title I—Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, National Infrastructure Investments, Public Law 111–117, 123 Stat. 3034. The purpose of the TIGER Discretionary Grants program is to advance projects that will have a significant impact on the Nation, Metropolitan area or a region.

This request for reinstatement advances the previously approved request of an information collection.
The information to be collected will be used to, receive applications for grant funds, to evaluate the effectiveness of projects that have been awarded grant funds and to monitor project financial conditions and project progress in support of the National Infrastructure Investments, referred to by the Department as ‘‘Grants for Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery’’, or ‘‘TIGER’’ Discretionary Grants program authorized and implemented pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the ‘‘Recovery Act’’) (OMB Control Number: 2105–0563) and the grants for National
Infrastructure Investments under the FY 2010 Appropriations Act or TIGER Discretionary Grant programs include promoting economic recovery and supporting projects that have a significant impact on the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region. **DATES :**  Written comments should be submitted by June 5, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments [identified by Docket No. DOT–OST– 2015–0061] through one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.

• Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12– 140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Robert Mariner, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, at

202–366–8914 or Robert.Mariner@ dot.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  OMB
Control Number: 2105–0563.

Title: National Infrastructure Investments Grant Program or ‘‘TIGER Discretionary Grants’’ and Supplemental Discretionary Grants for Capital Investments in Surface Transportation Infrastructure.

Form Numbers: None. Type of Review: Reinstatement with change of a previously approved
information collection.

Background: The Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery or ‘‘TIGER Discretionary Grants’’ program was created as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Through the Recovery Act and six appropriations acts, Congress provided DOT with funding for seven rounds of competitive grants totaling more than $4.6 billion for capital and planning investments in surface transportation infrastructure. Funding for 72 projects totaling more than $584 million under the TIGER program was announced on September 12, 2014. Projects were selected based on their alignment with the selection criteria specified in the Federal Register notice for the TIGER Discretionary Grant program. As announced in the Federal Register notices for each of the TIGER Discretionary Grant programs, grantees are expected to provide information to
the Government so that the Government may monitor the financial conditions and progress of projects, as well as the effectiveness of projects using performance measurement metrics negotiated between the grantees and the

Government.

This request reinstates the existing PRA clearance to cover the requests for information from grantees that is necessary to receive grant applications, negotiate the grant agreements, and cover the reporting requirements agreed to by recipients of TIGER Discretionary

Grants.

The reporting requirements for the program are as follows:

Grantees will submit reports on the financial condition of the project and the project’s progress. Grantees will submit progress reports and the Federal Financial Report (SF–425) to the Government on a quarterly basis, beginning on the 20th of the first month of the calendar-year quarter following the execution of a grant agreement, and
on the 20th of the first month of each calendar-year quarter thereafter until completion of the project. The initial report will include a detailed description, and, where appropriate, drawings, of the items funded.

Grantees will also submit an Annual Budget Review and Program Plan to the Government via email 60 days prior to the end of each Agreement year that they are receiving grant funds. The Annual Budget Review and Program Plan will provide a detailed schedule of activities, estimate of specific performance objectives, include forecasted expenditures, and schedule of milestones for the upcoming year. If there is an actual or projected project cost increase, the Annual Budget Review will include a written plan for providing additional sources of funding to cover the project budget shortfall or supporting documentation of committed
funds to cover the cost increase.

This information will be used to monitor grantees’ use of Federal funds, ensuring accountability and financial transparency in the TIGER programs.

Grantees will also submit reports on the performance (or projected performance) of the project on performance measures that the grantee and the Government select through negotiations. The Grantees will submit a Pre-project Report that will consist of
current baseline data for each of the performance measures specified in the
Performance Measurement Table in the grant agreement negotiated between thegrantee and the Government. The Preproject Report will include a detailed description of data sources, assumptions, variability, and the estimated level of precision for each
measure. The Grantees will submit interim Project Performance Measurement Reports to the Government for each of the performance measures specified in the Performance Measurement Table in the grant agreement negotiated between the grantee and the Government. Grantees will submit reports at each of the
intervals identified for the duration of


### 18504 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices

the time period specified in the
Performance Measurement Table in the grant agreement negotiated between the grantee and the Government. The Grantees will submit a Project Outcomes Report after the project is completed
that will consist of a narrative discussion detailing project successes
and/or the influence of external factors on project expectations.

This information collected will be used to evaluate and compare projects and the monitor results that grant funds achieve, ensuring that grant funds achieved the outcomes targeted by the TIGER Discretionary Grant program.

The Department’s estimated burden
for this information collection is the following:

Estimated Number of Responses:

5,570.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

500.

Estimated Costs : $4,259,310. Target Audience: Eligible Applicants’’ for TIGER Discretionary Grants are State, local, and tribal governments, including U.S. territories, transit agencies, port authorities, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), other political subdivisions of State or localgovernments, and multi-State or multijurisdictional groups applying through asingle lead applicant (for multijurisdictional groups, each member of the group, including the lead applicant, must be an otherwise eligible applicant as described in this paragraph).

Frequency: Quarterly, and Yearly. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 8 hours for each request for Quarterly Progress and Monitoring Report; 8 hours for each Annual Budget Review; 8 hours for each Quarterly Performance Measurement Report.

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 144,070 hours.

The following is detailed information and instructions regarding the specific reporting requirements for each report
identified above:

TIGER Discretionary Grant program grantees will submit a Project Progress and Monitoring Report and the Federal Financial Report (SF–425) to the Government on a quarterly basis. Grantees should use the following structure when preparing the quarterly Project Progress and Monitoring Report.

• Project Progress and Monitoring Report

Æ Frequency: Quarterly (on the 20th
of the first month of the calendar quarter).

Æ Report covers: Previous quarter, along with a two-quarter forecast.

Æ Start: Upon award of grant.

Æ End: Once construction is complete. Æ Format/Fields and accompanying instructions (beyond project ID information):

1. Executive Summary.—A clear and concise summary of the current status of the project, including identification of any major issues that have an impact on the project’s scope, budget, schedule, quality, or safety, including:

• Current total project cost (forecast) vs. latest budget vs. baseline budget. Include an explanation of the reasons for any deviations from the approved budget.

• Current overall project completion percentage vs. latest plan percentage.

• Any delays or exposures to milestone and final completion dates. Include an explanation of the reasons for the delays and exposures.

• A summary of the projected and actual dates for notices to proceed for significant contracts, start of construction, start of expenditure of TIGER Discretionary Grant funds, and project completion date. Include an explanation of the reasons for any discrepancies from the corresponding project milestone dates included in the Agreement.

• Any Federal obligations and/or TIFIA disbursements occurring during the month versus planned obligations or
disbursements.

• Any significant contracts advertised, awarded, or completed.

• Any significant scope of work changes.

• Any significant items identified as having deficient quality.

• Any significant safety issues.

• Any significant Federal issues such as environmental compliance, Buy America/Buy American (whichever is applicable to this Project), Davis Bacon Act Prevailing Wage requirements, etc.

2. Project Activities and
Deliverables.—Highlighting the project activities and deliverables occurring during the previous quarter (reporting period), and (2) define the activities and deliverables planned for the next two reporting periods. Activities and deliverables to be reported on should include meetings, audits and other reviews, design packages submitted, advertisements, awards, construction submittals, construction completion milestones, submittals related to Recovery Act requirements, media or Congressional inquiries, value engineering/constructability reviews, and other items of significance. The two reporting period ‘‘look ahead schedule’’
will enable the Government to accommodate any activities requiring input or assistance.

3. Action Items/Outstanding Issues.

— Drawing attention to, and tracking the progress of, highly significant or sensitive issues requiring action and direction in order to resolve. In general, issues and administrative requirements that could have a significant or adverse impact to the project’s scope, budget, schedule, quality, safety, and/or compliance with Federal requirements should be included. Status, responsible person(s), and due dates should be
included for each action item/ outstanding issue. Action items requiring action or direction should be included in the quarterly status meeting agenda. The action items/outstanding issues may be dropped from this section upon full implementation of the remedial action, and upon no further monitoring anticipated.

4. Project Schedule.—An updated master program schedule reflecting the current status of the program activities
should be included in this section. A Gantt (bar) type chart is probably the most appropriate for quarterly reporting purposes, with the ultimate format to be agreed upon between the grantee and the Government. It is imperative that the master program schedule be integrated, i.e., the individual contract milestones tied to each other, such that any delays occurring in one activity will be reflected throughout the entire program schedule, with a realistic completion date being reported. Narratives, tables, and/or graphs should accompany the updated master program schedule, basically detailing the current schedule status, delays and potential exposures, and recovery efforts. The following
information should also be included:

• Current overall project completion percentage vs. latest plan percentage.

• Completion percentages vs. latest plan percentages for major activities such as right-of-way, major or critical design contracts, major or critical construction contracts, and significant
force accounts or task orders. A schedule status description should also be included for each of these major or
critical elements.

• Any delays or potential exposures to milestone and final completion dates. The delays and exposures should be quantified and overall schedule impacts assessed. The reasons for the delays and exposures should be explained, and initiatives being analyzed or implemented in order to recover the
schedule should be detailed.

5. Project Cost.—An updated cost spreadsheet reflecting the current forecasted cost vs. the latest approved budget vs. the baseline budget should be included in this section. One way to track project cost is to show: (1) Baseline Budget, (2) Latest Approved Budget, (3) Current Forecasted Cost


### 18505 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices

Estimate, (4) Expenditures or Commitments to Date, and (5) Variance
between Current Forecasted Cost and Latest Approved Budget. Line items should include all significant costcenters, such as prior costs, right-ofway, preliminary engineering, environmental mitigation, general engineering consultant, section design contracts, construction administration, utilities, construction packages; force accounts/task orders, wrap-up insurance, construction contingencies, management contingencies, and other contingencies. The line items can be broken-up in enough detail such that specific areas of cost change can be sufficiently tracked and future improvements made to the overall cost estimating methodology. A Program
Total line should be included at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Narratives, tables, and/or graphs should accompany the updated cost spreadsheet, basically detailing the current cost status, reasons for cost deviations, impacts of cost overruns, and efforts to mitigate cost overruns. The following information should be provided:

• Reasons for each line item deviation from the approved budget, impacts resulting from the deviations, and initiatives being analyzed or implemented in order to recover any

cost overruns.

• Transfer of costs to and from contingency line items, and reasons supporting the transfers.

• Speculative cost changes that potentially may develop in the future, a quantified dollar range for each potential cost change, and the current status of the speculative change. Also, a comparison analysis to the available contingency amounts should be included, showing that reasonable and sufficient amounts of contingency remain to keep the project within the latest approved budget.

• Detailed cost breakdown of the general engineering consultant (GEC) services (if applicable), including such line items as contract amounts, task orders issued (amounts), balance remaining for tasks, and accrued (billable) costs.

• Federal obligations and/or TIFIA disbursements for the project, compared to planned obligations and
disbursements.

6. Project Funding Status.—The purpose of this section is to provide a status report on the non-TIGER Discretionary Grant funds necessary to complete the project. This report section should include a status update of any legislative approvals or other actions necessary to provide the non-TIGER Discretionary Grant funds to the project. Such approvals might include legislative authority to charge user fees or set toll rates, or the commitment of local funding revenues to the project. In the event that there is an anticipated or actual project cost increase, the project funding status section should include a report on the anticipated or actual
source of funds to cover the cost increase and any significant issues identified with obtaining additional funding.

7. Project Quality.—The purpose of this section is to: (1) Summarize the Quality Assurance/Quality Control activities during the previous month (reporting period), and (2) highlight any significant items identified as being deficient in quality. Deficient items noted should be accompanied by reasons and specifics concerning the deficiencies, and corrective actions taken or planned. In addition, the agency or firm responsible for the
corrective action should be
documented. Planned corrective actions
should then be included as Action Items/Outstanding Issues.

8. Federal Financial Report (SF– 425).—The Federal Financial Report (SF–425) is a financial reporting form used throughout the Federal Government Grant system. Grantees should complete this form and attach it to each quarterly Project Progress and Monitoring Report.

TIGER Discretionary Grant program grantees will submit an Annual Budget Review and Program Plan to the Government 60 days prior to the end of each Agreement year that they are receiving grant funds. Grantees should use the following structure when preparing the Annual Budget Review Report.

• Annual Budget Review Report

Æ Frequency: Yearly (60 days before the end of the Agreement year).

Æ Report covers: Upcoming Agreement year.

Æ Start: 60 days before first anniversary of grant award.

Æ End: Once construction is complete.

Æ Format/Fields and accompanying instructions (beyond project ID information):

1. Detailed Schedule of Activities.

— An updated master program schedule reflecting the current status of the program activities should be included in this section. A Gantt (bar) type chart is probably the most appropriate for annual reporting purposes.

2. Estimate of Specific Performance Objectives.—This section will discuss, what, if any performance objectives of the project will be achieved over the course of the upcoming Agreement Year and note any differences from the original project plan.

3. Forecasted Expenditures.—This section will discuss financial outlays that will occur in support of the project over the course of the upcoming Agreement Year and note any differences from the original project plan.

4. Schedule of Milestones for the Upcoming Agreement Year.—This section will discuss, what, if any project
milestones will be achieved over the course of the upcoming Agreement Year and the obligations associated with each milestone, noting any differences from the original project plan.

If there are no proposed deviations from the Approved Detailed Project Budget, the Annual Budget Review shall contain a statement stating such. The grantee will meet with the Government to discuss the Annual Budget Review and Program Plan. If there is an actual or projected project cost increase, the
annual submittal should include a written plan for providing additional sources of funding to cover the project budget shortfall or supporting
documentation of committed funds to
cover the cost increase. To the extent the annual budget update deviates from the approved project budget by more than 10 percent, then work proposed under the Annual Budget Review and Program Plan shall not commence until written approval from the Government
is received.

TIGER Discretionary Grant program grantees will submit Performance Measure Reports on the performance (or projected performance) of the project using the performance measures that the grantee and the Government selected through negotiations.

• Performance Measurement Reports

Æ Frequency: Quarterly (on the 20th
of the first month of the calendar quarter).

Æ Report covers: Previous quarter.

Æ Start: Once, upon award of grant; Quarterly, once construction complete.

Æ End: At the end of agreed upon performance measurement period.

Æ Format/Fields and accompanying instructions (beyond project ID information):

1. Performance Measures Narrative.

— Including a detailed description of data sources, assumptions, variability, and the estimated level of precision for each

measure.

2. Performance Measures Spreadsheet.—Government and grantee will agree on the format of the spreadsheet for each individual project. Measures (to be negotiated between grantees and the Government, individually) may include, but are not


### 18506 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices

limited to: Average tons handled/day; average daily gross ton-miles (GTM); average container lifts per day (TEUs); containers transported on lines (TEUs); transit passenger miles and hours oftravel; transit passenger & nonpassenger counts; transit rider characteristics; average bike and or pedestrian users at key locations; average daily traffic (ADT) and average daily truck traffic (ADTT); average daily total train delay (minutes); average daily total (all vehicles) vehicle delay at crossings; transit service level; facility service level; average hourly (or peak & off-peak) vehicle travel time; average hourly (or peak & off-peak) buffer index; annual crash rates by type/severity; average slow order miles and average daily delay minutes due to slow orders; bridge condition (Sufficiency Rating);road closure/lost capacity time (lanehours).

3. [For final Report] Project

Outcomes.—Detailing Project successes
and/or the influence of external factors on Project expectations. Including an ex post examination of project
effectiveness in relation to the Preproject Report baselines.

Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for OST’s performance; (b) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for OST to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB’s
clearance of this information collection.

Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1:48.

Issued in Washington, DC on March 25,

2015.
Patricia Lawton, DOT Paperwork Reduction Act Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015–07856 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS**
**AFFAIRS**

**Funding Availability Under Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program** 

**AGENCY :**  Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Fund Availability (NOFA); correction.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice corrects a provision requiring grantees to have spent a certain amount of their previous grant award by a certain date, as stated in the Department of Veterans Affairs’ February 3, 2015 NOFA, as amended on March 17, 2015,

Announcement Type: Amendment. Funding Opportunity Number: VA–

SSVF–021015.

Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 64.033, VA Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program. **DATES :**  Applications made in response to this amendment are due April 10,

2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. John Kuhn, Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program Office,
National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans, 4100 Chester Avenue, Suite 201, Philadelphia, PA 19104; (877) 737–0111 (this is a toll-free number); SSVF@va.gov

.

For a Copy of the Application Package: Copies of the application can be downloaded directly from the SSVF Program Web site at: www.va.gov/ homeless/ssvf.asp . Questions should be referred to the SSVF Program Office via phone at (877) 737–0111 (toll-free number) or via email at SSVF@va.gov

. For detailed SSVF Program information and requirements, see part 62 of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations (38 CFR part 62).

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  In the Federal Register of March 17, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015–05941, on page 13958, in the third column, under ‘‘II. Allocation of Funds’’ correct paragraph (2) to read: ‘‘(2) Applicants must have spent no less than 46 percent of their total direct service portion of their 3-year grant award (this includes direct service staff and funds allocated for temporary financial assistance) no later than August 30, 2015.’’

Dated: April 2, 2015. Jeffrey M. Martin, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2015–07903 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8320–01–P**