alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 33 (Monday, February 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 10581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, February 25, 2021 following the conclusion of 
the repayment hearing.

PLACE: Virtual meeting. Note: Because of the covid-19 pandemic, we will 
conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the 
meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual 
meeting, go to the commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Draft Advisory Opinion 2021-02: Full Employment Now-Political Action 
Committee (FEC-PAC)
Draft Advisory Opinion 2021-03: National Republican Senatorial 
Committee (NRSC) and National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC)
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Dr. Raul Ruiz for Congress 
(A19-03)
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer. 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-03694 Filed 2-18-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10276 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10276

 To direct the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to 
clarify ATF Form 4473 relating to crimes expunged and rights restored, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2024

   Mr. Higgins of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to 
clarify ATF Form 4473 relating to crimes expunged and rights restored, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Second Amendment Rights Restoration 
and Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF ATF FORM 4473 QUESTION ABOUT PRIOR CONVICTIONS 
              WHEN EXCEPTIONS APPLY.

    Within 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives 
shall issue a rule providing for Question 21.d., and the Notices, 
Instructions, and Definitions relating to that question, on ATF Form 
4473 to be revised to more clearly inform a reader of the form of--
            (1) the existence of the exceptions for the receipt of a 
        pardon, the expungement or set aside of a conviction, and the 
        restoration of rights; and
            (2) the correct information to provide in answering that 
        question when any of those exceptions apply.

SEC. 3. REVIEW OF CHARGES OF FALSE REPRESENTATION IN ANSWERING PRIOR 
              CONVICTION QUESTION ON ATF FORM 4473.

    Within 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General, the Attorney General, and the Director of the 
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives shall jointly--
            (1) conduct a review of all cases in which an individual 
        has been unjustly charged with making a false representation in 
        answering Question 21.d. on ATF Form 4473 since the date of the 
        enactment of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act; and
            (2) determine whether--
                    (A) any such charge was brought; and
                    (B) any funds made available under such Act were 
                used in bringing any such charge.
                                 <all>
```
570.404 Superseding leases. ( a ) Consider executing a superseding lease to replace an existing lease when the Government need numerous or detailed modifications to the space that would cause complications or substantially change the present lease or when market conditions warrant renegotiation of an existing lease.
( b ) If the value of the superseding lease exceeds the simplified lease acquisition threshold, the justification and approval requirements in FAR 6.3 and 506.3 apply. If the cost does not exceed the simplified lease acquisition threshold, the contracting officer may use the simplified procedures in 570.2 and explain the absence of competition in the file.
[64 FR 37265, July 9, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 30852, May 27, 2011]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****EjournalUSA. Economicperspectives**
 
2004:Sep
2005:Feb | Aug | Oct
2006:Jan | Jul
2007:Jan
 
SuDoc Number:S 20.16:
Item Number:0900-E-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000963949
 
September 27, 2018
#### Louis H. Maxfield and another *vs.*Michael Schwartz and another.

April 30, 1890.

(Agreement to Pay Another’s Debts — Action by Creditor. — Where the purchaser of a stock of goods of a partnership agreed, as a part of the consideration therefor, to assume and pay the existing firm debts of the vendors, the creditors of the firm may enforce the contract thus made for their benefit by action against such purchaser, though they were not specifically named or designated in the contract of sale.

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Sco'tt county, *Edson,*J., presiding, overruling their demurrer to the complaint. The action was brought to recover $287.81, on the agreement of defendants stated in the opinion.

*Macdonald & McLaughlin,*for appellants.

*Southworth & Coller,*for respondents.

Vanderburgh, J.1

The complaint shows that on the 19th day of July, 1889, and for a long time prior thereto, the firm of Berens & Nachtsheim were engaged in business as general merchants in the city of Shakopee, and owned a stock of goods and merchandise, book-accounts, claims, and demands, and at that date entered into an agreement in writing with the defendants in this action, whereby they agreed to sell and deliver to the defendants all the property of every kind then belonging to them, and the defendants agreed, as consideration for such purchase, to pay the sum of $5,071, and did also undertake and agree to and with Berens & Nachtsheim to pay all the debts and liabilities of the last-named firm as the same should become due and payable. Berens & Nachtsheim thereupon delivered over to the defendants the firm property so agreed to be sold, and the latter paid the sum of $5,071 agreed on, and assumed the debts and liabilities above mentioned. Among these debts and liabilities was a debt due and owing plaintiffs for goods and merchandise pre*222viously purchased of them by Berens & Naehtsheim, and for the recovery of a balance due thereon this action is brought.

By their agreement with their vendors the defendants made the outstanding debts of the firm a liability of their own. *Sullivan*v. *Murphy,*23 Minn. 6. The promise or agreement of the defendants in this case is, in legal effect, to pay to the creditors of Berens '& Naehtsheim, who were such at the time the promise was made, the debts due them from the vendors of the defendants, from whom the consideration moved. *Barlow*v. *Myers,*64 N. Y. 41. The plaintiffs are shown to belong to this class of creditors, and are therefore among those intended to be benefited, and are (entitled to enforce the contract directly for their own benefit, and to maintain this action for the amount due them. *Bassett*v. *Hughes,*43 Wis. 319; *Snell*v. *Ives,*85 Ill. 279.

Order affirmed.

1

 Mitchell, J., did not sit in this case.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Pregnancy Assistance Fund (PAF) Resource and Training Center      

# Pregnancy Assistance Fund (PAF) Resource and Training Center

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Adolescent Health

This webpage provides training and technical assistance resources for Pregnancy Assistance Fund (PAF) grantees and professionals working with pregnant and parenting teens. It includes information about PAF grants which help pregnant and parenting teens and their families gain access to health care, child care, housing, and other supports.

Behavioral health (mental health and substance abuse)

Federal programs

Health care

Pregnant and parenting youth

Policy makers

Service providers

Webpage

http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/oah-initiatives/paf_program/about.html
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DONNA McCUE-EMERY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3666

)

DAVID THOMAS EMERY, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 27, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Lauralee G. Westine, Judge.

Allison M. Perry of Florida Appeals, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellant. 

David L. Hurvitz of Law Office of David 

Hurvitz PA, Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
#### 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee.

As prescribed in 28.101-2, insert a provision or clause substantially as follows:

# Bid Guarantee (SEP 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States. The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be ____ percent of the bid price or $____, whichever is less.

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

(End of provision)

[61 FR 39213, July 26, 1996]
JOHN BEL EDWARDS 

GOVERNOR 

16 JUL 19 AH 4: 22 

AIR PERMITS SECTitfWucK CARR BRoWN, PH.D. 

6PD-R SECRETARY 

~tate of JLouisiana 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 

July 14, 2016 

1 eff Robin son 

Chief, Air Permits Section (6MM) 

Environinental Protection Agency, Region 6 

1445 Ross A venue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

Re: Louisiana's State Implementation Plan 

Dear Mr. Robinson: 

In years past, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted the following 

provisions to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for incorporation into Louisiana's State 

Implementation Plan (SIP): 

• LAC 33:Ill.525.A.2 

• LAC 33:Il1.525.B.2.c, B.3, B.4, B.5, B.6, B.7, and B.8 

• LAC 33:111.527.B.5 

• LAC 33:III.529.B 

Because the aforementioned provisions apply only to Part 70 sources and have already been 

approved by EPA as part of Louisiana's Operating Permits program, 

1 LDEQ hereby withdraws 

such provisions from EPA's review and requests that EPA take no further action to include such 

provisions in the state's SIP. 

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Bryan D. Johnston of the 

Air Permits Division at (225) 219-3450. 

EBV:BDJ 

1 59 FR43797 (August25, 1994); 60 FR 17750 (April?, 1995); 60 FR47296 (September 12, 1995) 

Post Office Box 4313 • Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-4313 • Phone 225-219-3181 • Fax 225-219-3309 

www.deq.louisiana.gov
A HYBRID TREATMENT PROCESS FOR HIGH TDS OIL-FIELD P RODUCED WATER

Ashok Kumar Ghosh Fred Yarger* Van Romero Michael Hensley Robert Bowman Michael Pulin Clint Richardson Hilda Asemsro Gideon Sarpong Harry Morgan New Mexico Tech 801 Leroy Place 118 WEIR Hall Socorro, NM 87801 Voice: 575-835-5505 Fax: 575-835-5209 ashok@nmt.edu

South Eastern New Mexico (SENM) produces in the ran ge of 400 million barrels of produced water per year, with total dissolve solids (TDS) in the range of ~ 200,000 ppm. Most often, disposal is done b y transporting the water long distance to disposal-po nds, costing around ~$1.2 billion /year using an estimated 0.3 million barrels of transportation fue l. The objective of this current project is to desi gn, develop and demonstrate the best possible technolog y economically achievable to desalinate produced water and make the same suitable for a number of ap plications.

Reverse Osmosis (RO) is quite effective for desalin ation of water with TDS < 30,000 ppm (i.e. sea wate r). As the amount of TDS increases, there is a dispropo rtionate increase in the requirement of pressure fo r the RO process, making the process very expensive. In this context a hybrid process based on forward osmosis (FO) is under development using draw soluti ons that can induce high osmotic pressure at no applied external pressure. Current presentation com piles issues and opportunities associated with this hybrid technique. A number of pretreatments, includ ing ones suggested by Late Prof. Robert Bowman, were investigated to reduce fouling and scaling pot ential of the membranes. Feasibility of using this hybrid process to economically treat produced water will be analyzed and discussed.

###
570.106-1 Synopsis of lease awards. ( a ) Except for lease actions described in paragraph (b) of this subsection, contracting officers must synopsize in the GPE awards exceeding $25,000 total contract value that are likely to result in the award of any subcontracts. However, the dollar threshold is not a prohibition against publicizing an award of a smaller amount when publicizing would be advantageous to industry or to the Government.
( b ) A notice is not required if— ( 1 ) The notice would disclose the occupant agency's needs and the disclosure of such needs would compromise the national security; or
( 2 ) The lease— ( i ) Is for an amount not greater than the simplified lease acquisition threshold;
( ii ) Was made through a means where access to the notice of proposed lease action was provided through the GPE; and
( iii ) Permitted the public to respond to the solicitation electronically.
( c ) Justifications for other than full and open competition must be posted in the GPE Information exempt from public disclosure must be redacted.
[76 FR 30849, May 27, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 38337, June 26, 2020]
----

----

|   | 1.   The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.   The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: July      11,      2008                                                                                                    |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                             |   |   |
| /s/      Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                      |   |   |
| Michael      A. Reisner                                                                                                          |   |   |
| Co-Chief      Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
Exhibit 32(i)




CLARCOR
Inc.


Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002




We
hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report of CLARCOR Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 29, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR
Inc.





June
      18, 2010
                      
                      
                      By
                      /s/
      Norman E. Johnson(Date)
                      
                      
                      Norman
      E. Johnson
                        Chairman
      of the Board, President and Chief
                        Executive
      OfficerJune
      18, 2010
                      
                      
                      By
                      /s/
      David J. Fallon(Date)
                      
                      
                      David
      J. Fallon
                        Chief
      Financial Officer and
                        Chief
      Accounting
Officer
```

[114th Congress Public Law 63]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 549]]

Public Law 114-63
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To permanently allow an exclusion under the Supplemental Security Income 
     program and the Medicaid program for compensation provided to 
  individuals who participate in clinical trials for rare diseases or 
             conditions. <<NOTE: Oct. 7, 2015 -  [S. 139]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Ensuring Access 
to Clinical Trials Act of 2015. 42 USC 1305 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Access to Clinical Trials 
Act of 2015''.
SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 42 USC 1382a note.>>  ELIMINATION OF SUNSET 
                    PROVISION.

    Effective as if included in the enactment of the Improving Access to 
Clinical Trials Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-255, 124 Stat. 2640), 
section 3 of that Act is amended by striking subsection (e).

    Approved October 7, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 139:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            July 16, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 15-A



[Letterhead of Deloitte & Touche LLP]

 Deloitte &
 Touche LLP
____________                      _________________________________________
                                  Suite 900        Telephone (313) 396-3000
                                  600 Renaissance Center
                                  Detroit, Michigan  48243-1704




Chrysler Financial Corporation
27777 Franklin Road
Southfield, Michigan




We have made a review,in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
financial information of Chrysler Financial Corporation (a subsidiary of
Chrysler Corporation) and consolidated subsidiaries for the periods ended
March 31, 1998 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated April 8, 1998;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your 
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998,
is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-55789,
33-64179, 333-31093 and 333-49647 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


April 9, 1998

_______________
Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
International  
_______________

<PAGE>







                      This page intentionally left blank.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Geologic and airborneradioactivity studies in the Rock Corral area, San Bernardino County,California**
 
Report | Plates: 1516
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1021-C
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000963588
 
October 5, 2018