alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Slip Op. 99 - 124 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, JUDGE

RUBBERFLEX SDN. BHD. AND RUBFIL SDN. BHD., Plaintiffs,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Court No. 97-12-02180

JUDGMENT ORDER Upon consideration of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd. v. United States, Slip Op. 99-68 (July 23, 1999) , October 22, 1999 (“Remand Results”), and all other papers filed herein, and no parties having filed comments regarding the Remand Results, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained in all respects; and it is further ORDERED that, all other issues having been decided in this case, judgment is entered in accordance with the Court’s opinion in Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd. v. United States , No. 97-12- 02180, Slip Op. 99-68 (CIT July 23, 1999).______________________ Richard W. Goldberg JUDGE Dated: November 24, 1999

New York, New York.
#### 52.232-17 Interest.

As prescribed in 32.611(a) and (b), insert the following clause:

# Interest (MAY 2014)

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this contract under a Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data clause or a Cost Accounting Standards clause, all amounts that become payable by the Contractor to the Government under this contract shall bear simple interest from the date due until paid unless paid within 30 days of becoming due. The interest rate shall be the interest rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury as provided in 41 U.S.C. 7109, which is applicable to the period in which the amount becomes due, as provided in paragraph (e) of this clause, and then at the rate applicable for each six-month period as fixed by the Secretary until the amount is paid.

(b) The Government may issue a demand for payment to the Contractor upon finding a debt is due under the contract.

(c) *Final Decisions.* The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

(1) The Contracting Officer and the Contractor are unable to reach agreement on the existence or amount of a debt in a timely manner;

(2) The Contractor fails to liquidate a debt previously demanded by the Contracting Officer within the timeline specified in the demand for payment unless the amounts were not repaid because the Contractor has requested an installment payment agreement; or

(3) The Contractor requests a deferment of collection on a debt previously demanded by the Contracting Officer (see 32.607-2).

(d) If a demand for payment was previously issued for the debt, the demand for payment included in the final decision shall identify the same due date as the original demand for payment.

(e) Amounts shall be due at the earliest of the following dates:

(1) The date fixed under this contract.

(2) The date of the first written demand for payment, including any demand for payment resulting from a default termination.

(f) The interest charge shall be computed for the actual number of calendar days involved beginning on the due date and ending on—

(1) The date on which the designated office receives payment from the Contractor;

(2) The date of issuance of a Government check to the Contractor from which an amount otherwise payable has been withheld as a credit against the contract debt; or

(3) The date on which an amount withheld and applied to the contract debt would otherwise have become payable to the Contractor.

(g) The interest charge made under this clause may be reduced under the procedures prescribed in 32.608-2 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation in effect on the date of this contract.

(End of clause)

[73 FR 54006, Sept. 17, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 53152, Aug. 30, 2010; 79 FR 24223, Apr. 29, 2014]
49.402-4 Procedure in lieu of termination for default. The following courses of action, among others, are available to the contracting officer in lieu of termination for default when in the Government's interest: ( a ) Permit the contractor, the surety, or the guarantor, to continue performance of the contract under a revised delivery schedule.
( b ) Permit the contractor to continue performance of the contract by means of a subcontract or other business arrangement with an acceptable third party, provided the rights of the Government are adequately preserved.
( c ) If the requirement for the supplies and services in the contract no longer exists, and the contractor is not liable to the Government for damages as provided in 49.402-7, execute a no-cost termination settlement agreement using the formats in 49.603-6 and 49.603-7 as a guide.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135432 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135432 

 COA: 272941 

Emmet CC: 05-002530 

DENNIS JOHN BEER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 19, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 42 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 42

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
 approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act 
                                of 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2023

 Mr. Clyde (for himself, Mrs. Luna, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. 
  Carter of Georgia, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Issa, Mr. 
Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Grothman, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Hern, Mr. Webster 
 of Florida, Mr. Yakym, Mr. Stauber, Mr. LaTurner, Mr. D'Esposito, Mr. 
  Comer, and Mrs. Boebert) submitted the following joint resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
 approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act 
                                of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 
(D.C. Act 24-781), enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia 
on January 19, 2023, and transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 
602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act on January 26, 
2023.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Central
Maine Power Company's Consolidated Statement of Earnings, Consolidated Balance
Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,061,852
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                       74,366
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           261,259
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         611,137
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,008,614
<COMMON>                                         162,214
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        276,892
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               78,991
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   518,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             65,571
<PREFERRED>                                       53,528
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             551,698
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                     0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                              0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                     25,200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          7,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                       35,852
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   2,177
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   749,491
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  2,008,614
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        268,367
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               9,554
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       233,200
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       242,754
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           27,513
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   618
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    28,131
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,104
<NET-INCOME>                                      16,027
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        2,208
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     13,819
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           7,305
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          7,446
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            58,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .43
        


</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Reentry Matters: Voices of Experience      

# Resource: Reentry Matters: Voices of Experience

This video shares firsthand accounts of why reentry matters from individuals living and working in Second Chance Act grantee communities.**Learn more.**
# C_2019264EN.01000101.xml

| 6.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 August 2019

(2019/C 264/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1182 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4658 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91880 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7603 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0893 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9720 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,776 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 326,99 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3142 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7325 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,1990 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6520 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4775 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7638 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7138 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5453 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 359,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6794 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8705 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3805 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 006,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6724 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,191 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,6588 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,435 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3805 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8221 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,1529 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1182

JPY

Japanese yen

118,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4658

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91880

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7603

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0893

ISK

Iceland króna

136,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9720

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,776

HUF

Hungarian forint

326,99

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3142

RON

Romanian leu

4,7325

TRY

Turkish lira

6,1990

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6520

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4775

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7638

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7138

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5453

KRW

South Korean won

1 359,84

ZAR

South African rand

16,6794

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8705

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3805

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 006,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6724

PHP

Philippine peso

58,191

RUB

Russian rouble

72,6588

THB

Thai baht

34,435

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3805

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8221

INR

Indian rupee

79,1529

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
EXHIBIT 12.1

                 CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (CONSOLIDATED)
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                   FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
                            (Thousands Except Ratio)
                                   (Unaudited)


     Operating Income                               $287,355

     Adjustments
        Income taxes                                  83,549
        Provision for deferred income taxes           13,476
        Deferred investment tax credits               (5,207)
        Other income and deductions                    7,712
        Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
             used during construction                  5,233
                                                    ---------

               Earnings                             $392,118
                                                    =========


     Fixed Charges:
        Interest on long-term debt                   $88,644
        Interest on short-term debt and other         20,007
        Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities   12,000
                                                    ---------

               Fixed Charges                        $120,651
                                                    =========


     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges               3.25
                                                    =========



                                       74
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianL. Knepp, Vice President of Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Brian L. Knepp                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian L. Knepp  Principle Accounting Officer |
|                                         |
| March 8, 2005                           |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2015-09245]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Part 412

Office of the Secretary

45 CFR Part 170

[CMS-1632-P]
RIN-0938-AS41

Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems 
for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective 
Payment System Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2016 Rates; Revisions of 
Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers, Including 
Changes Related to the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2015-09245 beginning on page 24324 in the 
issue of Thursday, April 30, 2015 make the following correction(s):
     On page 24324, in the second column, in the DATES section, 
``June 29, 2015'' should read ``June 16, 2015''.

[FR Doc. C1-2015-09245 Filed 5-4-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
4.705-3 Acquisition and supply records. ( a ) Store requisitions for materials, supplies, equipment, and services: Retain 2 years.
( b ) Work orders for maintenance and other services: Retain 4 years.
( c ) Equipment records, consisting of equipment usage and status reports and equipment repair orders: Retain 4 years.
( d ) Expendable property records, reflecting accountability for the receipt and use of material in the performance of a contract: Retain 4 years.
( e ) Receiving and inspection report records, consisting of reports reflecting receipt and inspection of supplies, equipment, and materials: Retain 4 years.
( f ) Purchase order files for supplies, equipment, material, or services used in the performance of a contract; supporting documentation and backup files including, but not limited to, invoices, and memoranda; e.g., memoranda of negotiations showing the principal elements of subcontract price negotiations (see 52.244-2): Retain 4 years.
( g ) Production records of quality control, reliability, and inspection: Retain 4 years.
( h ) Property records (see FAR 45.101 and 52.245-1): Retain 4 years.
[48 FR 42113, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 34060, June 22, 1998;75 FR 38679, July 2, 2010]
NO. 07-07 -002 5-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B APR IL 15 , 200 8

_________

_________

_________

___ DO NN YKEV IN D AVIS , Appel lan t

v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 10 8 DIS T RI CT COU RT OF P OT T ERCOU NT Y; TH NO. 53, 837 -E; HON. ABE LOP EZ, PRESI DING

_________

_________

_________

____ Memorandum Opinion After Ab ateme nt

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Per our former opi nio n, we remanded t hisca use to the tri al cour t w it h di re cti ons that itco nv ene a hear ing upon the mot ion for n ew tr ial fil ed by

Donny Kev in Da v is
. At that ti me, the t ri al cour

t w as to deter mine w hether Dav is re cei v ed ine ffect iv e ass is tanc e of coun sel beca use h is trial atto rney did n o tr e qu e s t or objectto the omission of an acco mp lice w it ness i nst ru cti on. After conc lud ing thattr ial co uns e l’s “ omis si on di d notco nst it ute2

def icient pe rforma nce” an d ap pellan t “was no t prejud iced by the om ission,” the trial court deni ed th e moti on. Fi ndi ng no e rror i n tha t dec is ion , we aff ir m the final j udg ment. As su m in g a r

g u e n dothatthe failu re to re q uestan a cc ompli ce w it ness i nst ru cti on cons ti tutesdefecti v e per formance, se e Henso n v. State , 9 1 5 S
. W
. 2 d 1 8 6 , 1 9 7 (T e x. App .–Corp us Christi 1996 , no pe t.)( s o ho l ding), the evidence unrelat ed to the acco mp lice’s t e s t i mo n y

s u ffi c e d t o c o n n e cta p p e l l a n tt o t h e c r i me c h a rg e d
. S o t o o d id it , b y i t s e l f, provide suf

f icient ba sis upon w hich a jury could rationa lly conclud e , b e yo n d reaso nab le doubt, thatappel lan t c ommitt ed the burg lar y . Indeed, w e concl uded asmuch in our pr ior opi nio n, see Dav

is v. Sta te, No. 07- 07- 0025- CR , 200 8 Tex . Ap p. L EX IS 5 3 ( T e x. App.– Amar il lo Janua ry

4, 2008, no pet . h. ), as di d the tr ial co urt i n i ts findi ng s o f factand conc l u s i o n s o f l a w . G i v e n t h i s , we n o w h o l d t h a tt h e re wa s n o ta re a s o n a b l e p robabi li ty that th e o u tc o m e woul d hav e di ffered had the o mis si on notoc cur re d; c onseq uentl y , t he tr ial co urt di d noter r in deny ing a ne w tr ial
. S e e He n s on v. State , 9 15 S. W .2d a t 197 (h old ing thati f the re i s a r e asona ble pos si bil ity thata rati onal j ur

y woul d c onv ict t he defendant w it hout the a cc ompli ce w it ness tes ti mony , t hen t ri al couns el’ s o mis si on i s n ot re v ersi ble er ro r) ; acc or

d C unni nghamv. Sta te , N o. 06-05 -0 215- CR , 2006 T ex . App. L E X IS 820 6 at *6 (Te x . App .–T exarkana, Sep tem ber 19, 200 6, pe t. ref ’d) (concludin g similarly ). By thi s o pin ion , we hav e resol v ed al l is sues pend in g i n t hisappeal and aff ir m the jud g ment of the tr ial co urt.
Br ian Qui nn Chief Justice Do not p ubl is h.