alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 52.204-12 Unique Entity Identifier Maintenance.

As prescribed in 4.607(c), insert the following clause:

# Unique Entity Identifier Maintenance (OCT 2016)

(a) *Definition. Unique entity identifier,* as used in this clause, means a number or other identifier used to identify a specific commercial, nonprofit, or Government entity. See *www.sam.gov* for the designated entity for establishing unique entity identifiers.

(b) The Contractor shall ensure that the unique entity identifier is maintained with the entity designated at the System for Award Management (SAM) for establishment of the unique entity identifier throughout the life of the contract. The Contractor shall communicate any change to the unique entity identifier to the Contracting Officer within 30 days after the change, so an appropriate modification can be issued to update the data on the contract. A change in the unique entity identifier does not necessarily require a novation be accomplished.

### (End of clause)

[81 FR 67739, Sept. 30, 2016]
# C_2021088EN.01000101.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 88/01)

Last publication

OJ C 79, 8.3.2021

Past publications

OJ C 72, 1.3.2021

OJ C 62, 22.2.2021

OJ C 53, 15.2.2021

OJ C 44, 8.2.2021

OJ C 35, 1.2.2021

OJ C 28, 25.1.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit
      32











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Champion Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
      Marshall T. Reynolds, Todd R. Fry and Toney K. Adkins, Chief Executive Officer,
      Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively,
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





|· | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|· | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







By:  /s/Marshall
      T. Reynolds


Marshall
      T. Reynolds


Chief
      Executive Officer








By:  /s/
      Todd R. Fry


Todd
      R.
      Fry


Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








By:  /s/
      Toney K. Adkins


Toney
      K.
      Adkins


President
      and Chief Operating Officer





Date:
      March 8, 2006
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary School Districts, 2021      

# Report: Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary School Districts, 2021

This report (PDF, 29 pages) includes data tables on public elementary and secondary education revenues and expenditures at the local education agency (LEA) or school district level for fiscal year 2021. Tables include finance data on these topics: 
                  -  Current expenditure totals and current expenditure per pupil amounts by state as well as for the 100 largest LEAs  
                  -  Federal, state, and local revenues for the 100 largest LEAs  
                  -  Median revenues per pupil and median current expenditures per pupil by geographic region and locale  
                  -  Current expenditure totals and current expenditure per pupil amounts by activity (e.g., instruction, support services) and specific expenditure (e.g., salaries and wages, employee benefits), by state and for the two largest LEAs in each state  
                  -  Federal revenues received by LEAs, by program and state  
                  -  Local revenues by source, by state  
                  -  Capital outlay expenditures by state  

**Learn more.**
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Permanency Planning with Youth      

# Resource: Permanency Planning with Youth

This webpage shares resources to help child welfare professionals as they permanency plan with youth. The webpage provides links to resources on culturally responsive practices, identity development, and youth engagement.**Learn more.**
#### 3052.216-74 Settlement of letter contract.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3016.603-4, insert a clause substantially the same as the following:

# Settlement of Letter Contract (DEC 2003)

(a) This contract constitutes the definitive contract contemplated by letter contract ___ (*insert number*) issued on ___ (*insert effective date*). It supersedes the letter contract and its modification numbered ___ (*insert number(s)*). To the extent there are inconsistencies between the definitive contract and the letter contract, the former governs.

(b) The cost(s) and fee(s), or price(s), established in this definitive contract represents full and complete settlement of letter contract ___ (*insert number*) and modification numbered ___ (*insert number(s)*). Payment of the fee agreed upon or profit withheld pending definitization of the letter contract, may start immediately at the rate and times stated within this contract.

(End of clause)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0417. GOSPEL TABERNACLE DELIVERANCE CENTER, INC. et al.

v. DAVIS O’LEARY VI, LTD.

Plaintiff Davis O’Leary VI, Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against GospelTabernacle

Deliverance Center, Inc. (“Gospel Tabernacle”), Wiley Jackson, Jr. and Rodney

Jackson (collectively, “Defendants”),

1 alleging claims against Gospel Tabernacle for

negligence, indemnification and contribution, recklessness, gross negligence, punitive

damages, and expenses of litigation, and alleging that “the corporate veil of Gospel

Tabernacle is pierced so as to render [Wiley Jackson, Jr. and Rodney Jackson] liable

for Plaintiff’s claims alleged against Gospel Tabernacle.” Defendants all moved for

summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment to Defendants as to

Plaintiff’s indemnification claim; it denied summary judgment to Defendants on the

negligence and contribution claims.

2

In Case No. A17A0416, Plaintiff appealed the

grant of summary judgment to Defendants as to the indemnification claims. In the

instant case, Defendants cross-appealed the denial of summary judgment as to the

remaining claims against them.

1

Jackson Construction, Inc. was named as a defendant in the suit but was

dismissed.

2 Wiley Jackson, Jr. and Rodney Jackson contend in this appeal that they are

entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff’s veil-piercing claim, arguing that they are

not personally liable for the claims against Gospel Tabernacle. The trial court’s order

contains no ruling on this issue, but Jackson and Jackson contend that the trial court

erred in failing to grant their motion. However, this issue is moot.

May 16, 2017
Plaintiff withdrew its appeal in Case No. A17A0416, and moves this Court to

dismiss the cross-appeal in the instant case.

Although under OCGA § 5-6-48(e), a cross-appeal may survive the

dismissal of the main appeal, this is true only where the cross-appeal can

stand on its own merit. . . . When an appeal from the denial of a summary

judgment motion is filed as a cross-appeal, appellate jurisdiction over the

cross-appeal necessarily arises from the court’s jurisdiction over the main

appeal from the directly appealable order, and thus the cross-appeal must

derive its life from the main appeal.

Serco Co. v. Choice Bumper, 199 Ga. App. 846 (406 SE2d 276) (1991) (citations and

punctuation omitted).

Since Defendants filed no application under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) for

interlocutory review of the denial of their summary judgment motion, and the main

appeal has been withdrawn, this Court has no jurisdiction over the cross-appeal. See

id. Thus, the cross-appeal in A17A0417 is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/16/2017
# C_2020040EN.01000101.xml

| 6.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 February 2020

(2020/C 40/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1023 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4728 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84444 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5450 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0717 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1173 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,055 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 335,76 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2491 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7734 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5975 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6299 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4644 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5572 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7006 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5202 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 302,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2246 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6858 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4568 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 036,47 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5382 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,961 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,0320 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,133 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,6614 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4923 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,4330 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1023

JPY

Japanese yen

120,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4728

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84444

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5450

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0717

ISK

Iceland króna

138,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1173

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,055

HUF

Hungarian forint

335,76

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2491

RON

Romanian leu

4,7734

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5975

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6299

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4644

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5572

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7006

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5202

KRW

South Korean won

1 302,97

ZAR

South African rand

16,2246

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6858

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4568

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 036,47

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5382

PHP

Philippine peso

55,961

RUB

Russian rouble

69,0320

THB

Thai baht

34,133

BRL

Brazilian real

4,6614

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4923

INR

Indian rupee

78,4330

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
37.601 General. ( a ) Solicitations may use either a performance work statement or a statement of objectives (see 37.602).
( b ) Performance-based contracts for services shall include— ( 1 ) A performance work statement (PWS);
( 2 ) Measurable performance standards (*i.e.*, in terms of quality, timeliness, quantity, etc.) and the method of assessing contractor performance against performance standards; and
( 3 ) Performance incentives where appropriate. When used, the performance incentives shall correspond to the performance standards set forth in the contract (see 16.402-2).
[71 FR 218, Jan. 3, 2006, as amended at 86 FR 61030, Nov. 4, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5 
<CIK> 0000016104 
<NAME> CAGLE'S, INC. 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997 
<CASH>                                             306 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    22786 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       571 
<INVENTORY>                                      30219 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 54197 
<PP&E>                                           98620 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   39197 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  136589 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            27168 
<BONDS>                                          44071 
<COMMON>                                          5006 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                                       60344
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    136589
 
<SALES>                                          86767 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 86767 
<CGS>                                            81645 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    86122 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2201) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 977 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1869 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       699 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1170 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      1170 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23 
         

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 00-50089

Summary Calendar

_____________________

IRA L. FRANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of

Justice; JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General,

United States of America,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-99-CV-132-FB)

_________________________________________________________________

September 12, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ira L. Frank, an INS employee, appeals the summary judgment

granted the Government in his action brought pursuant to the

Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(2). We conclude, based on our de

novo review of the record, that the district court did not err in

granting summary judgment. See FED. R. CIV. P. 56.

As the result of an INS investigation, discussed infra, Frank
2

was, inter alia, relocated. His administrative appeal is pending.

The merits of the proceedings are not at issue here. Instead, the

action at hand involves the Privacy Act. 

The Government asserted in the district court, as well as on

appeal, that Frank improperly named Attorney General Reno as a

defendant, premised on the Privacy Act’s not giving federal courts

jurisdiction over individuals. Because the Government is correct,

and because Frank has agreed with the Government, we need not

address claims against the Attorney General. See Petrus v. Bowen,

833 F.2d 581, 582 (5th Cir. 1987).

Frank contends that: the Government failed to obtain

information directly from him to the greatest extent practicable

because the investigator interviewed others before interviewing

him; and OPM regulations required his being contacted first in the

investigation. We agree with other courts that have addressed this

issue that an investigator need not in all circumstances obtain

information first from the subject of an investigation. See, e.g.,

Darst v. Social Sec. Admin., 172 F.3d 1065, 1068 (8th Cir. 1999).

Here, the investigation concerned allegations of misconduct

involving sexually suggestive and inappropriate comments to

subordinates by Frank. The nature and the circumstances of the

alleged misconduct made it impracticable to interview Frank first;

and the Government's investigatory methods in this case did not

violate his rights under the Privacy Act. See Hudson v. Reno, 130
3

F.3d 1193, 1204-05 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822

(1998); Brune v. Internal Revenue Service, 861 F.2d 1284, 1287-88

(D.C. Cir. 1988).

AFFIRMED
----

 

**EXHIBIT 32(b)**

** **

Cleco Power LLC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ClecoPower LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David M. Eppler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

/s/David M.Eppler                               David M. EpplerPresident and ChiefExecutive Officer

----

**EXHIBIT 32(b)**

** **

Cleco Power LLC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ClecoPower LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Dilek Samil, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

/s/DilekSamil                               Dilek SamilChief Financial Officerand Senior Vice President of Finance

----