Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 28379 

shield, in accordance with Part 1 of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker 

Service Bulletin SBF28–28–053, Revision 1, 

dated September 20, 2010. 

(h) If during the general visual inspection 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD, it is 

found that a by-pass wire is not installed, 

before the next flight: Install the by-pass wire 

between the housing of the in-tank FQI cable 

plug and the cable shield, in accordance with 

Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Fokker Service Bulletin SBF28–28–053, 

Revision 1, dated September 20, 2010. 

Maintenance Program Revision To Add Fuel 

Airworthiness Limitation for Model F.28 

Airplanes Serial Numbers 11003 Through 

11041 and 11991 Through 11994 

(i) For airplanes having serial numbers 

11003 through 11041 inclusive and 11991 

through 11994 inclusive: Concurrently with 

paragraph (g) of this AD, revise the airplane 

maintenance program by incorporating 

CDCCL–1 specified in paragraph 1.L.(1)(c) of 

Fokker Service Bulletin SBF28–28–053 

Revision 1, dated September 20, 2010. 

Maintenance Program Revision To Add Fuel 

Airworthiness Limitation for Model F.28 

Airplanes Serial Numbers 11042 Through 

11241 

(j) For airplanes having serial numbers 

11042 through 11241 inclusive: Within 3 

months after the effective date of this AD, 

revise the airplane maintenance program by 

incorporating CDCCL–2 specified in 

paragraph 1.L.(1)(c) of Fokker Service 

Bulletin SBF28–28–053, Revision 1, dated 

September 20, 2010. 

No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or 

CDCCLs 

(k) After accomplishing the revisions 

required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD, 

no alternative actions (e.g., inspection, 

interval) and/or CDCCLs may be used unless 

the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are 

approved as an AMOC in accordance with 

the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of 

this AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: 

Although European Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive 

2010–0217, dated October 21, 2010, specifies 

both revising the maintenance program to 

include airworthiness limitations, and doing 

certain repetitive actions (e.g., inspections) 

and/or maintaining CDCCLs, this AD only 

requires the revision. Requiring a revision of 

the maintenance program, rather than 

requiring individual repetitive actions and/or 

maintaining CDCCLs, requires operators to 

record AD compliance only at the time the 

revision is made. Repetitive actions and/or 

maintaining CDCCLs specified in the 

airworthiness limitations must be complied 

with in accordance with 14 CFR 91.403(c). 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(l) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Tom Rodriguez, Program Manager, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 

3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 

227–1149. Information may be e-mailed to: 

9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

Related Information 

(m) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2010–0217, dated October 21, 2010; 

and Fokker Service Bulletin SBF28–28–053, 

Revision 1, dated September 20, 2010; for 

related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 6, 

2011. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–12016 Filed 5–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0376; Airspace 

Docket No. 10–AEA–11] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Amendment and 

Establishment of Air Traffic Service 

Routes; Northeast United States 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

amend five Air Traffic Service (ATS) 

routes and establish four new ATS 

routes. The existing routes that would 

be amended are Q–42, J–60, V–16, V– 

229 and V–449. The proposed new 

routes are Q–62, Q–406, Q–448 and Q– 

480. The FAA is proposing this action 

to increase National Airspace System 

(NAS) efficiency, enhance safety and 

reduce delays within the New York 

Metropolitan area airspace. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 1, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone: 

(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2011–0376 and 

Airspace Docket No. 10–AEA–11 at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace, Regulations and ATC 

Procedures Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2011–0376 and Airspace Docket No. 10– 

AEA–11) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management Facility (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2011–0376 and 

Airspace Docket No.10–AEA–11.’’ The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified comment closing 

date will be considered before taking 

action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
28380 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

public docket both before and after the 

comment closing date. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http:// 

www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/ 

air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. An informal docket 

may also be examined during normal 

business hours at the office of the 

Eastern Service Center, Operations 

Support Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 210, 1701 

Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

Background 

The New York/New Jersey/ 

Philadelphia Metropolitan Area is 

served by four major airports: Newark 

Liberty International, John F. Kennedy 

International, La Guardia, and 

Philadelphia International, as well as 

numerous smaller airports generating 

significant air traffic operations. The 

close proximity of the airports, 

combined with high air traffic volume 

and a complex airspace structure, 

contribute to less efficient system 

operations and air traffic delays that can 

affect airports across the United States. 

The FAA has been working on various 

initiatives to increase the efficiency and 

reliability of the airspace structure in 

order to maintain safety, respond to 

increasing aviation operations and 

mitigate mounting air traffic delays. Key 

elements of these efforts include 

improving user access to the NAS, 

expediting arrivals and departures, and 

providing more flexible routing options. 

Other benefits include reduced ATC 

system complexity, balanced air traffic 

controller workload, reduced voice 

communications requirements and 

reduced aircraft fuel consumption. This 

notice proposes a number of ATS route 

changes to help address the above 

issues. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 to amend jet route J– 

60, area navigation (RNAV) route Q–42, 

and VOR Federal airways V–16, V–229 

and V–449. In addition, the FAA is 

proposing to establish four new RNAV 

routes designated as Q–62, Q–406, 

Q–448 and Q–480. 

The proposed changes would 

facilitate the rerouting of westbound air 

traffic departing the New York 

metropolitan area and would also better 

sequence this departing traffic with en 

route overflight traffic. The current 

traffic flows would be split with new 

routes and navigation fixes added to 

reduce delays within the New York 

terminal airspace. The proposed new 

and revised ATS routes would mostly 

be used for departures but are also 

designed to more efficiently 

accommodate aircraft landing within 

the Potomac Terminal Radar Approach 

Control (TRACON) airspace. Potomac 

TRACON airspace includes, but is not 

limited to, Washington Dulles 

International Airport, Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport, 

Baltimore/Washington International 

Thurgood Marshall Airport, and their 

satellite airports. The proposed route 

changes would also help segregate the 

Potomac TRACON arrivals from the 

high altitude routes extending from the 

Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center 

(ARTCC) and New York ARTCC areas of 

responsibility. 

This action proposes to modify the 

following existing routes: J–60, Q–42, 

V–16, V–229 and V–449. J–60 would be 

realigned at a point northwest of the 

East Texas, PA, VHF Omnidirectional 

Range/Distance Measuring Equipment 

(VOR/DME), by inserting a dogleg to the 

north of course, then bypassing the East 

Texas VOR/DME, and extending 

through a new westgate departure fix, 

NEWEL, to be added in the vicinity of 

the ELIOT fix. J–60 would then resume 

course to the Sparta, NJ, VORTAC. This 

realignment would help reduce 

congestion and converging en route 

aircraft flows and mitigate a choke point 

over the existing ELIOT departure fix. 

RNAV route Q–42 would be amended 

by deleting the current segments 

between the BRNAN, PA, waypoint 

(WP) and ELIOT, PA, WP and replacing 

them with segments extending from 

BRNAN WP to new WPs HOTEE, PA; 

BTRIX, PA; SPOTZ, PA, and 

terminating at a new waypoint ZIMMZ, 

NJ. This change would also help reduce 

converging flows and reduce 

congestion. 

VOR Federal airways V–16 and V–229 

would be amended by inserting a dogleg 

north of their present courses by 

following the Kennedy VOR/DME 052° 

(magnetic) radial northeast of Kennedy 

VOR/DME. V–16 would then turn east 

bound, bypassing the Deer Park VOR/ 

DME, then proceeding to the Calverton 

VOR/DME and resuming its current 

course. V–229 would also be modified 

along the Kennedy VOR/DME 052° 

radial, then turning eastbound to reintercept its current course toward the 

Bridgeport, CT, VOR/DME. The V–16 

and V–229 changes are intended to free 

up airspace to accommodate a climb 

corridor for John F. Kennedy 

International Airport departures. 

V–449 currently extends between the 

Lake Henry, PA, VORTAC and the 

Albany, NY, VORTAC. This route 

would be lengthened westward by 

adding a new segment that extends 

between the Selinsgrove, PA, VORTAC 

and the Lake Henry VORTAC via the 

Milton, PA, VORTAC. This change 

would facilitate routing for arrivals into 

La Guardia Airport. 

Four new RNAV routes are being 

proposed and would be designated as 

Q–62, Q–406, Q–448 and Q–480. Q–62 

would enhance westward flows, reduce 

congestion and provide flexibility for 

aircraft entering the Cleveland ARTCC 

area and routings toward Chicago. 

Q–406, Q–448 and Q–480, along with 

the amended Q–42, would reduce 

current converging en route flows that 

result from dependency on groundbased navigation aids. The new Q-route 

segments would permit some alignment 

with the, to be established, New York 

departure fixes NEWEL, CANDR and 

ZIMMZ. These new fixes would be used 

for departures from the New York 

metropolitan area airports to transition 

and merge aircraft from the terminal 

structure into the high altitude en route 

structure and vice versa. In addition, the 

new routes would relieve congestion by 

providing alternate routings for aircraft 

landing at airports outside the New 

York Metropolitan area. 

For the full descriptions of these 

proposed route changes, see The 

Proposed Amendment section, below. 

Radials in the VOR Federal airway 

descriptions below are stated in True 

degrees, except for the proposed 

amended airway segments, which 

include both True and Magnetic values. 

In a final rule, only True degrees would 

be stated. 

Jet routes are published in paragraph 

2004, high altitude RNAV routes are 

published in paragraph 2006, and VOR 

Federal airways are published in 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 28381 

paragraph 6010, respectively, of FAA 

Order 7400.9U dated August 18, 2010, 

and effective September 15, 2010, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The jet routes, high altitude RNAV 

routes and VOR Federal airways listed 

in this document would be 

subsequently published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

Department of Transportation (DOT) 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this proposed rule, 

when promulgated, will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it modifies the route structure as 

required to preserve the safe and 

efficient flow of air traffic in the 

northeast United States. 

Environmental Review 

This proposed action qualifies for a 

categorical exclusion in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures, Paragraph 311a. This 

airspace action is not expected to cause 

any potentially significant 

environmental impacts, and no 

extraordinary circumstances exist that 

warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9U, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, Dated August 18, 2010 and 

effective September 15, 2010, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 2004 Jet Routes. 

* * * * * 

J–60 [Amended] 

From Los Angeles, CA; via Paradise, CA; 

Hector, CA; Boulder City, NV; Bryce Canyon, 

UT; Hanksville, UT; Red Table, CO; Mile 

High, CO; Hayes Center, NE; Lincoln, NE; 

Iowa City, IA; Joliet, IL; Goshen, IN; DRYER, 

OH; Philipsburg, PA; INT Philipsburg 100° 

(110° M) and Ravine, PA 071° (082° M) 

radials; INT Sparta, NJ, 253° (264° M) and 

Broadway, NJ, 295° (306° M) radials; to 

Sparta, NJ. 

* * * * * 

Paragraph 2006 United States Area 

Navigation Routes. 

* * * * * 

Q42 Kirksville, MO (IRK) to ZIMMZ, NJ [Amended] 

Kirksville, MO (IRK) VORTAC (Lat. 40°08′06′′ N., long. 92°35′30′′ W.) 

STRUK, IL WP (Lat. 40°14′04′′ N., long. 90°18′22′′ W.) 

Danville, IL (DNV) VORTAC (Lat. 40°17′38′′ N., long. 87°33′26′′ W.) 

Muncie, IN (MIE) VOR/DME (Lat. 40°14′14′′ N., long. 85°23′39′′ W.) 

HIDON, OH WP (Lat. 40°10′00′′ N., long. 81°37′27′′ W.) 

BUBAA, OH WP (Lat. 40°10′27′′ N., long. 80°58′17′′ W.) 

PSYKO, PA WP (Lat. 40°08′37′′ N., long. 79°09′13′′ W.) 

BRNAN, PA WP (Lat. 40°08′07′′ N., long. 77°50′07′′ W.) 

HOTEE, PA WP (Lat. 40°20′36′′ N., long. 76°29′37′′ W.) 

BTRIX, PA WP (Lat. 40°36′06′′ N., long. 75°49′11′′ W.) 

SPOTZ, PA WP (Lat. 40°45′55′′ N., long. 75°22′59′′ W.) 

ZIMMZ, NJ WP (Lat. 40°48′11′′ N., long. 75°07′25′′ W.) 

*******

Q62 NOLNN, OH to SARAA, PA [New] 

NOLNN, OH WP (Lat. 41°14′04′′ N., long. 84°38′12′′ W.) 

WEEVR, OH WP (Lat. 41°13′21′′ N., long. 84°13′04′′ W.) 

PSKUR, OH WP (Lat. 41°09′16′′ N., long. 82°42′57′′ W.) 

FAALS, OH WP (Lat. 41°02′51′′ N., long. 80°52′40′′ W.) 

ALEEE, OH WP (Lat. 41°00′28′′ N., long. 80°31′54′′ W.) 

QUARM, PA WP (Lat. 40°49′45′′ N., long. 79°04′39′′ W.) 

BURNI, PA FIX (Lat. 40°39′25′′ N., long. 77°48′14′′ W.) 

MCMAN, PA FIX (Lat. 40°38′16′′ N., long. 77°34′14′′ W.) 

VALLO, PA FIX (Lat. 40°37′37′′ N., long. 77°26′18′′ W.) 

Ravine, PA (RAV) VORTAC (Lat. 40°33′12′′ N., long. 76°35′58′′ W.) 

SUZIE, PA FIX (Lat. 40°27′12′′ N., long. 75°58′22′′ W.) 

SARAA, PA FIX (Lat. 40°26′22′′ N., long. 75°53′16′′ W.) 

Q406 Broadway, NJ (BWZ) to Barnes, MA (BAF) [New] 

Broadway, NJ (BWZ) VOR/DME (Lat. 40°47′54′′ N., long. 74°49′19′′ W.) 

JEETR, NY WP (Lat. 41°08′30′′ N., long. 74°05′46′′ W.) 

BASYE, NY FIX (Lat. 41°20′37′′ N., long. 73°47′55′′ W.) 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
28382 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

TRIBS, CT WP (Lat. 41°39′29′′ N., long. 73°19′03′′ W.) 

BIGGO, CT FIX. (Lat. 41°57′21′′ N., long. 73°04′05′′ W.) 

Barnes, MA (BAF) VORTAC (Lat. 42°09′43′′ N., long. 72°42′58′′ W.) 

Q448 Pottstown, PA (PTW) to Barnes, MA (BAF) [New] 

Pottstown, PA (PTW) VORTAC (Lat. 40°13′20′′ N., long. 75°33′37′′ W.) 

LANNA, NJ FIX (Lat. 40°33′35′′ N., long. 75°01′40′′ W.) 

JEETR, NY WP (Lat. 41°08′30′′ N., long. 74°05′46′′ W.) 

BASYE, NY FIX (Lat. 41°20′37′′ N., long. 73°47′55′′ W.) 

TRIBS, CT WP (Lat. 41°39′29′′ N., long. 73°19′03′′ W.) 

BIGGO, CT FIX. (Lat. 41°57′21′′ N., long. 73°04′05′′ W.) 

Barnes, MA (BAF) VORTAC (Lat. 42°09′43′′ N., long. 72°42′58′′ W.) 

Q480 ZANDR, OH to Kennebunk, ME (ENE) [New] 

ZANDR, OH FIX (Lat. 40°00′19′′ N., long. 81°31′58′′ W.) 

Bellaire, OH (AIR) VOR/DME (Lat. 40°01′01′′ N., long. 80°49′02′′ W.) 

LEJOY, PA FIX (Lat. 40°00′12′′ N., long. 79°24′54′′ W.) 

VINSE, PA FIX (Lat. 39°58′16′′ N., long. 77°57′21′′ W.) 

BEETS, PA WP (Lat. 39°57′20′′ N., long. 77°26′59′′ W.) 

HOTEE, PA WP (Lat. 40°20′36′′ N., long. 76°29′37′′ W.) 

BTRIX, PA WP (Lat. 40°36′06′′ N., long. 75°49′11′′ W.) 

SPOTZ, PA WP (Lat. 40°45′55′′ N., long. 75°22′59′′ W.) 

CANDR, NJ WP (Lat. 40°58′02′′ N., long. 74°57′30′′ W.) 

JEFFF, NJ WP (Lat. 41°14′46′′ N., long. 74°27′43′′ W.) 

Kingston, NY (IGN) VOR/DME (Lat. 41°39′56′′ N., long. 73°49′20′′ W.) 

LESWL, CT WP (Lat. 41°53′31′′ N., long. 73°19′20′′ W.) 

Barnes, MA (BAF) VORTAC (Lat. 42°09′43′′ N., long. 72°42′58′′ W.) 

Kennebunk, ME (ENE) VORTAC (Lat. 43°25′32′′ N., long. 70°36′49′′ W.) 

*******

Paragraph 6010 VOR Federal Airways. 

V–16 [Amended] 

From Los Angeles, CA; Paradise, CA; Palm 

Springs, CA; Blythe, CA; Buckeye, AZ; 

Phoenix, AZ; INT Phoenix 155° and 

Stanfield, AZ, 105° radials; Tucson, AZ; 

Cochise, AZ; Columbus, NM; El Paso, TX; 

Salt Flat, TX; Wink, TX; INT Wink 066° and 

Big Spring, TX, 260° radials; Big Spring; 

Abilene, TX; Bowie, TX; Bonham, TX; Paris, 

TX; Texarkana, AR; Pine Bluff, AR; Marvell, 

AR; Holly Springs, MS; Jacks Creek, TN; 

Shelbyville, TN; Hinch Mountain, TN; 

Volunteer, TN; Holston Mountain, TN; 

Pulaski, VA; Roanoke, VA; Lynchburg, VA; 

Flat Rock, VA; Richmond, VA; INT 

Richmond 039° and Patuxent, MD, 228° 

radials; Patuxent; Smyrna, DE; Cedar Lake, 

NJ; Coyle, NJ; INT Coyle 036° and Kennedy, 

NY, 209° radials; Kennedy; INT Kennedy 

040° (052° M) and Calverton, NY, 261° 

(274°M) radials; Calverton; Norwich, CT; 

Boston, MA. The airspace within Mexico and 

the airspace below 2,000 feet MSL outside 

the United States is excluded. The airspace 

within Restricted Areas R–5002A, R–5002C, 

and R–5002D is excluded during their times 

of use. The airspace within Restricted Areas 

R–4005 and R–4006 is excluded. 

V–229 [Amended] 

From Patuxent, MD; INT Patuxent 036° and 

Atlantic City, NJ, 236° radials; Atlantic City; 

INT Atlantic City 055° and Colts Neck, NJ, 

181° radials; INT Colts Neck 181° and 

Kennedy, NY, 209° radials; Kennedy; INT 

Kennedy 040° (052° M) and Calverton, NY, 

261° (274° M) radials; INT Calverton 261° 

(274°) and Kennedy 053° (065° M) radials; 

INT Kennedy 053° and Bridgeport, CT, 200° 

radials; Bridgeport; Hartford, CT; INT 

Hartford 040° and Gardner, MA, 195° radials; 

Gardner; Keene, NH; INT Keene 336° and 

Burlington, VT, 160° radials; to Burlington. 

The airspace within R–5002B is excluded 

during times of use. The airspace below 

2,000 feet MSL outside the United States is 

excluded. 

V–449 [Amended] 

From Selinsgrove, PA; Milton, PA; INT 

Milton 064° (073° M) and Williamsport, PA 

109° (118° M) radials; Lake Henry, PA; 

DeLancey, NY; Albany, NY. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 10, 

2011. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations & ATC 

Procedures Group. 

[FR Doc. 2011–12002 Filed 5–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0184; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–ANM–4] 

Proposed Establishment of Class E 

Airspace; Nephi, UT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish Class E airspace at Nephi 

Municipal Airport, Nephi, UT. 

Controlled airspace is necessary to 

accommodate aircraft using a new Area 

Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning 

System (GPS) standard instrument 

approach procedures at Nephi 

Municipal Airport, Nephi, UT. The FAA 

is proposing this action to enhance the 

safety and management of aircraft 

operations at the airport. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 1, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 

366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2011–0184; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–ANM–4, at the beginning 

of your comments. You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; 

telephone (425) 203–4537. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS