alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 52.247-63 Preference for U.S.-Flag Air Carriers.

As prescribed in 47.405, insert the following clause:

# Preference for U.S.-Flag Air Carriers (JUN 2003)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*International air transportation* means transportation by air between a place in the United States and a place outside the United States or between two places both of which are outside the United States.

*United States* means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.

*U.S.-flag air carrier* means an air carrier holding a certificate under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 411.

(b) Section 5 of the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974 (49 U.S.C. 40118) (Fly America Act) requires that all Federal agencies and Government contractors and subcontractors use U.S.-flag air carriers for U.S. Government-financed international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property, to the extent that service by those carriers is available. It requires the Comptroller General of the United States, in the absence of satisfactory proof of the necessity for foreign-flag air transportation, to disallow expenditures from funds, appropriated or otherwise established for the account of the United States, for international air transportation secured aboard a foreign-flag air carrier if a U.S.-flag air carrier is available to provide such services.

(c) If available, the Contractor, in performing work under this contract, shall use U.S.-flag carriers for international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property.

(d) In the event that the Contractor selects a carrier other than a U.S.-flag air carrier for international air transportation, the Contractor shall include a statement on vouchers involving such transportation essentially as follows:

# Statement of Unavailability of U.S.-Flag Air Carriers

International air transportation of persons (and their personal effects) or property by U.S.-flag air carrier was not available or it was necessary to use foreign-flag air carrier service for the following reasons (see section 47.403 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation): [*State reasons*]:

### (End of statement)

(e) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (e), in each subcontract or purchase under this contract that may involve international air transportation.

(End of clause)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 27468, July 20, 1988; 62 FR 240, Jan. 2, 1997; 68 FR 28088, May 22, 2003]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Communityeligibility provision evaluation**
 
Summary | Entire Report | Volume II | Addendum
 
SuDoc Number:A 98.2:C 73/3
Item Number:0074-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000935272
 
September 25, 2018
# C_2021082EN.01000601.xml

| 11.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 March 2021

(2021/C 82/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1892 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4366 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85655 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1305 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1069 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 152,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0813 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,226 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 367,48 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5752 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8865 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,0269 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5430 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5041 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2307 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6590 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6019 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 357,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,1740 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7433 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5865 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 130,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9072 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,780 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,9744 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,592 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,8807 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,2221 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,8100 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1892

JPY

Japanese yen

129,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4366

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85655

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1305

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1069

ISK

Iceland króna

152,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0813

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,226

HUF

Hungarian forint

367,48

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5752

RON

Romanian leu

4,8865

TRY

Turkish lira

9,0269

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5430

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5041

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2307

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6590

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6019

KRW

South Korean won

1 357,05

ZAR

South African rand

18,1740

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7433

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5865

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 130,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9072

PHP

Philippine peso

57,780

RUB

Russian rouble

87,9744

THB

Thai baht

36,592

BRL

Brazilian real

6,8807

MXN

Mexican peso

25,2221

INR

Indian rupee

86,8100

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### GREENFIELD v. DOEPFNER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 2, 1906.)

Negligence—Contributory Negligence—Question fob Juey.

Though a hall and stairway were insufficiently lighted, one using the stairway was not, as a matter of law, negligent in merely steadying herself against the bannister, without actually grasping it.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Action by Frederika Greenfield against Otto Doepfner. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and GlFGERICH and GREFNBAUM, JJ.

Arthur S. Cosby, for appellant.

Philip I. Schick, for respondent.

SCOTT, P. J.

The evidence that the hall and stairways were insufficiently lighted, and that this was the immediate cause of the accident, is quite satisfactory. We may not say as matter of law that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence because she only steadied herself against the bannister, without actually grasping it (Brown v. Wittner, 43 App. Div. 135, 59 N. Y. Supp. 385), nor should we, in my opinion, so find as matter of fact, in face of the opposite view taken by the trial justice. The damages were very moderate.

I favor affirmance, with costs. All concur.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-11-0489

SAT Date: 7/19/2011

Print Date: 11/10/2011

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 1 PMN

2 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ; Hyd Pdt slow

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

IRR-E,S,MM

SENS-S,L

UNCERT MUTA

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-11-0489

FATE: Estimations for low weight hydrolysis product 

log Kow = 2.90 (E)

log Koc = 4.56 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.58 (E)

log Fish BAF = 0.77 (E)

PMN Substance: with MP < 25 C (E)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
S = Reacts

Hydrolysis Half-life = min-hr

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90-99 via sorption 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of the low molecular weight fraction 

is poor all routes, based on physical/chemical properties. There are concerns 

for irritation to the eye, skin, and mucous membranes, and for dermal and respiratory 

sensitization, based on There also is uncertain concern for mutagenicity, based on 

 Test Data: Submitted with the PMN:

Negative in the Salmonella assay with and without activation;

Rat acute (15D) oral (gavage) LD50 > 2000 mg/kg;

Rat acute (15D) dermal LD50 > 2000 mg/kg;

Moderate eye irritant in rabbits; effects cleared within 7 days;

]Moderate skin irritant in rabbits; 

Dermal sensiotizer in female guinea pigs; 26D study, intradermal induction followed by topical 

challenge

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Typ

e

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic 

value

*

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage 

Sludge

3-h EC50 _

Sewage _ Chronic _

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
Sludge Value

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = polymer-nonionic ; pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness 

<150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonionic

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
#### 552.238-100 Transshipments.

As prescribed in 538.273(d)(24), insert the following clause:

# Transshipments (MAY 2019)

(a) The Contractor shall complete two (2) DD Forms 1387, Military Shipment Labels and, if applicable, four copies of DD Form 1387-2, Special Handling/Data Certification—used when shipping chemicals, dangerous cargo, etc.

(1) Two copies of the DD Form 1387 will be attached to each shipping container delivered to the port Transportation Officer for subsequent transshipment by the Government as otherwise provided for under the terms of this contract.

(2) These forms will be attached to one end and one side, not on the top or bottom, of the container.

(3) The Contractor will complete the bottom line of these forms, which pertains to the number of pieces, weight and cube of each piece, using U.S. weight and cubic measures. Weights will be rounded off to the nearest pound. (One kg = 2.2 U.S. pounds; one cubic meter = 35.3156 cubic feet.)

(b) In addition, if the cargo consists of chemicals, or is dangerous, one copy of the DD Form 1387-2 will be attached to the container, and three copies will be furnished to the Transportation Officer with the Bill of Lading.

(c) Dangerous cargo will not be intermingled with non-dangerous cargo in the same container.

(d) Copies of the above forms and preparation instructions will be obtained from the ordering activity issuing the Delivery Order. Reproduced copies of the forms are acceptable.

(e) Failure to include DD Form 1387, and DD Form 1387-2, if applicable, on each shipping container will result in rejection of shipment by the port Transportation Officer.

(End of clause)

[84 FR 17046, Apr. 23, 2019]
#### 504.1301 Policy.

Contracting officers must follow the procedures contained in CIO P2181.1—GSA HSPD-12 Personal Identity Verification and Credentialing Handbook, which may be obtained from the CIO Office of Enterprise Solutions, to ensure compliance with Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12) “Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors,” Office of Management and Budget Memorandum M-05-24, and Department of Commerce FIPS PUB 201.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                               FRONTIER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                           COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                          -----------------------------------------
                                              1996           1995           1994

<S>                                       <C>            <C>            <C>        
Net Income                                $14,616,844    $12,614,926    $10,360,273
                                          =========================================

Computation of average shares
outstanding:

              Shares outstanding at
              beginning of year             6,322,255      4,196,435      3,799,477

              Additional shares deemed
              outstanding because of
              stock dividends                 443,628        441,495        820,595

              Shares issued pursuant
              to stock splits                              2,100,650      2,093,986

              Shares issued during
              the year times average
              time outstanding during
              the year                         33,642          9,987          7,637
                                          -----------------------------------------

Average Shares Outstanding                  6,799,525      6,748,567      6,721,695
                                          =========================================

Primary Earnings Per Share                $      2.15    $      1.87    $      1.54
                                          =========================================
</TABLE>



The effect of stock options outstanding has a dilutive effect of less than 3% of
total outstanding shares, and is therefore not shown.





                                      -25-
#### 52.217-1 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony Eppolito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for the period indicated.  Dated: March 31, 2011  /s/ G. Anthony EppolitoG. Anthony EppolitoVice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Chicago Railway Equipment Company, appellee, v. James Wilson, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,986.

Forcible detainer. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Howard Hayes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1926.

Reversed and remanded.

Barnes, J., dissents.

Opinion filed October 5, 1926.

William E. Rodriguez, for appellant; John M. Humphrey and Hamlin K. Buchman, of counsel.

Musgrave, Oppenheim, Price & McKeever, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 416.603-4 Contract clauses.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.216-75, Letter Contract, in a definitive contract superseding a letter contract.
#### 52.250-2 SAFETY Act Coverage Not Applicable.

As prescribed in 50.206(a), insert the following provision:

# Safety Act Coverage Not Applicable (FEB 2009)

The Government has determined that for purposes of this solicitation the product(s) or service(s) being acquired by this action are neither presumptively nor actually entitled to a pre-determination that the products or services are qualified anti-terrorism technologies as that term is defined by the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act), 6 U.S.C. 441-444. This determination does not prevent sellers of technologies from applying for SAFETY Act protections in other contexts. Proposals in which either acceptance or pricing is made contingent upon SAFETY Act designation as a qualified anti-terrorism technology or SAFETY Act certification as an approved product for homeland security of the proposed product or service will not be considered for award. See Federal Acquisition Regulation subpart 50.2.

(End of provision)

[72 FR 63037, Nov. 7, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 2738, Jan. 15, 2009]
isco-ex102_184.htm



Exhibit 10.2

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO STANDARD MULTI-TENANT 

OFFICE LEASE – GROSS

This Fourth Amendment to Standard Multi-Tenant Office Lease - Gross (“4th  Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 1st day of March, 2017 by and between S Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Lessor”) and International Stem Cell Corporation, a California corporation (“Lessee”), with reference to the following facts:

A.Parties have entered into that certain Standard Multi-Tenant Office Lease – Gross, dated for reference purposes only February 19, 2011 (“Original Lease”).

 

B.Parties have executed the 1st Amendment to the Original Lease (“1st Amendment”), effective July 1st, 2011. 

 

C.Parties have executed the 2nd Amendment to the Original Lease (“2nd Amendment”), effective July 1st, 2013.

 

D.Parties have executed the 3rd Amendment to the Original Lease (‘3rd Amendment”), effective February 29, 2016.

 

E.Lessor and Lessee desire to amend the Original Lease as more particularly set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Effective Date. This 4th Amendment to Original Lease shall be effective as of March 1, 2017 (“Effective Date”). 





	
 
	
2.
	
Term: The Term of the Original Lease is hereby extended by three (3) years, and will expire on February 29, 2020, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms of the Original Lease.





	
 
	
3.
	
Base Rent. The Base Rent during the period of March 1, 2017 and February 29, 2020, inclusive, shall increase by 3% each year.





				
	
Current Base Rent
	
3/1/2017 to 2/28/2018
	
3/1/2018 to 2/28/2019
	
3/1/2019 to 2/29/2020

	
$12,557.76
	
$12,934.49
	
$13,322.52
	
$13,722.20






 


	
 
	
4.
	
Except as expressly set forth herein, the Original Lease, as amended, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect, and Lessee and Lessor shall be subject to all the terms and conditions thereof.





	
 
	
5.
	
Board of Director’s Approval. The terms of this 4th Amendment to the Original Lease were presented to ISCO’s Board of Directors on Friday, February 10, 2017. ISCO BOD and Management (ISCO CEO) discussed the terms of the Amendment and agreed that the terms are competitive in relation to market rates and are therefore in the best interest of the Company. The terms of this Amendment were approved by the independent ISCO Board of Directors, with two interested Directors abstaining. 




 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.

 


	
International Stem Cell Corporation
	
 
	
S Real Estate Holdings

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
"LESSEE"
	
 
	
"LESSOR"

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
/s/ Mahnaz Ebrahimi
	
 
	
/s/ Russell Kern

	
Signature
	
 
	
Signature

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Mahnaz Ebrahimi
	
 
	
Russell Kern

	
Name
	
 
	
Name

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
CFO
	
 
	
Manager

	
Title
	
 
	
Title

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
February 22, 2017
	
 
	
February 22, 2017

	
Date
	
 
	
Date
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Global
Wataire, Inc. for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2006, I, Sydney A. Harland,
Chief Executive Officer of Global Wataire, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending August
31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ending August 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Wataire,
Inc.

Dated: December 14, 2006.

                                   /s/ Sydney A. Harland
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of
                                   Global Wataire, Inc.
#### FICCARO, Respondent v. NEW YORK & Q. ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Annie Ficcaro against the New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Company.

No opinion. Jfidgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### 52.215-9 Changes or Additions to Make-or-Buy Program.

As prescribed in 15.408(a), insert the following clause:

# Changes or Additions to Make-or-Buy Program (OCT 1997)

(a) The Contractor shall perform in accordance with the make-or-buy program incorporated in this contract. If the Contractor proposes to change the program, the Contractor shall, reasonably in advance of the proposed change, (1) notify the Contracting Officer in writing, and (2) submit justification in sufficient detail to permit evaluation. Changes in the place of performance of any “make” items in the program are subject to this requirement.

(b) For items deferred at the time of negotiation of this contract for later addition to the program, the Contractor shall, at the earliest possible time—

(1) Notify the Contracting Officer of each proposed addition; and

(2) Provide justification in sufficient detail to permit evaluation.

(c) Modification of the make-or-buy program to incorporate proposed changes or additions shall be effective upon the Contractor's receipt of the Contracting Officer's written approval.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (OCT 2010). As prescribed in 15.408(a)(1) add the following paragraph (d) to the basic clause:

(d) If the Contractor desires to reverse the categorization of “make” or “buy” for any item or items designated in the contract as subject to this paragraph, it shall—

(1) Support its proposal with certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 when required by FAR 15.403, and data other than certified cost or pricing data, to permit evaluation; and

(2) After approval is granted, promptly negotiate with the Contracting Officer an equitable reduction in the contract price in accordance with paragraph (k) of the Incentive Price Revision—Firm Target clause or paragraph (m) of the Incentive Price Revision—Successive Targets clause of this contract.

*Alternate II* (OCT 2010). As prescribed in 15.408(a)(2), add the following paragraph (d) to the basic clause:

(d) If the Contractor desires to reverse the categorization of “make” or “buy” for any item or items designated in the contract as subject to this paragraph, it shall—

(1) Support its proposal with certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, when required by FAR 15.403, and data other than certified cost or pricing data, to permit evaluation; and

(1) Support its proposal with cost or pricing data to permit evaluation; and

(2) After approval is granted, promptly negotiate with the Contracting Officer an equitable reduction in the contract's total estimated cost and fee in accordance with paragraph (e) of the Incentive Fee clause of this contract.

[62 FR 51261, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 53150, Aug. 30, 2010]