alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

     NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

     Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 provides that in case any part
of a registration statement, when such part became effective, contained an
untrue statement of a material fact, or omitted to state a material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration
statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person
knew of such untruth or omission) may sue, among others, an accountant who has
with his consent been named as having certified any part of the registration
statement, or as having prepared any report which is used in connection with the
registration statement.

     On June 6, 2002, we dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen") as
its independent auditors. For more information, please see our Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated June 6, 2002. Both the engagement partner and the manager for
our audit are no longer with Arthur Andersen. As a result, we have been unable
to obtain Arthur Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference of
Arthur Andersen's audit report with respect to our financial statements as of
and for the years ended October 31, 2001 and October 31, 2000 into our
previously filed registration statements File Nos. 33-49402, 33-72716, 33-62381,
333-16933, 333-53416, 333-69650 and 333-99717. Such audit report is included in
this Form 10-K.

     Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act of 1933
permits us to file this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the
above listed registration statements, without a written consent from Arthur
Andersen. However, as a result, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability
under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a
material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen
or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly,
you would be unable to assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section
11(a) of the Securities Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,261
<INVENTORY>                                        868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,903
<PP&E>                                       1,859,115
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,002,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,041,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          280,434
<BONDS>                                        164,311
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,968
<OTHER-SE>                                     218,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,041,223
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               494,739
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                106,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,528
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             62,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,550
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Guide To Black Hole Safety      

# Resource: Guide To Black Hole Safety

This webpage contains animated video clips and a safety brochure about black holes. Resources explain what black holes are and where to find them. **Learn more.**
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-25,632-03

EX PARTE TRACY BRIAN BROWN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 580614-C IN THE 339TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY and SLAUGHTER, JJ., dissented.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to thirty-five

years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Brown v. State, No. 01-

92-00973-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1 ] 1993, pet. ref’d). Applicant filed this application for a writ st

of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends, among other things, that his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to

determine the objective of his defense were violated by counsel’s concession of guilt during closing

arguments. Applicant also contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he (1) failed to present

the former or live testimony of a key defense witness; and (2) conceded his guilt during closing
2

arguments. Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant’s constitutional rights

were violated and that trial counsel was ineffective.

Relief is granted. The judgment in cause number 580614 in the 339th District Court of

Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County

to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the TexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: June 15, 2022

Do not publish
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DONALD CHASE

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 15

- 3237

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Ma rion County

, Hale R. Stancil , Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney Gener al, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.

We remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener's error in Count II of the written

sentence to reflect the impos ition of a twenty

- five

- year minimum mandatory sentence

co nsistent with the court's oral pronouncement. We otherwise affirm.

REVERSED in part ; AFFIRMED in part ; and REMANDED

.2

COHEN, C.J.

, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
45.102 Policy. ( a ) Contractors are ordinarily required to furnish all property necessary to perform Government contracts.
( b ) Contracting officers shall provide property to contractors only when it is clearly demonstrated— ( 1 ) To be in the Government's best interest;
( 2 ) That the overall benefit to the acquisition significantly outweighs the increased cost of administration, including ultimate property disposal;
( 3 ) That providing the property does not substantially increase the Government's assumption of risk; and
( 4 ) That Government requirements cannot otherwise be met.
( c ) The contractor's inability or unwillingness to supply its own resources is not sufficient reason for the furnishing or acquisition of property.
( d ) *Exception.* Property provided under contracts for repair, maintenance, overhaul, or modification is not subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( e ) Government property, other than foundations and similar improvements necessary for installing special tooling, special test equipment, or equipment, shall not be installed or constructed on contractor-owned real property in such fashion as to become nonseverable, unless the head of the contracting activity determines that such installation or construction is necessary and in the Government's interest.
[72 FR 27385, May 15, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 38680, July 2, 2010; 77 FR 12942, Mar. 2, 2012]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|May 14, 2007
#### 52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference.

As prescribed in 52.107(a), insert the following provision:

# Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

[*Insert one or more Internet addresses*]

(End of provision)

[62 FR 64928, Dec. 9, 1997]
# C_2019406EN.01000601.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/6 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court (2019/C 406/09) Following her appointment as Judge at the General Court for the period from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2022 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 1 February 2019, ( 1 ) Ms Stancu took the oath before the Court of Justice on 26 September 2019. Following his appointment as Judge at the General Court for the period from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2025 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 1 February 2019, 1 Mr Truchot took the oath before the Court of Justice on 26 September 2019. Following her appointment as Judge at the General Court for the period from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2022 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 6 March 2019, ( 2 ) Ms Pynnä took the oath before the Court of Justice on 26 September 2019. Following their appointment as Judges at the General Court for the period from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2025 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 29 May 2019, Mr Laitenberger, Mr Martín y Pérez de Nanclares, Mr Norkus, Ms Perišin, Mr Sampol Pucurull, Ms Škvařilová-Pelzl and Ms Steinfatt took the oath before the Court of Justice on 26 September 2019. Following his appointment as Judge at the General Court for the period from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2022 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 29 May 2019, ( 3 )Mr Nõmm took the oath before the Court of Justice on 26 September 2019. Following their appointment as Judges at the General Court for the period from 1 September 2019 to 31 August 2025 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 10 July 2019, ( 4 ) Mr Mastroianni and Ms Porchia took the oath before the Court of Justice on 26 September 2019. Following his appointment as Judge at the General Court for the period from 6 September 2019 to 31 August 2022 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 4 September 2019, ( 5 ) Mr Hesse took the oath before the Court of Justice on 26 September 2019. ( 1 )  OJ L 32, 4.2.2019, p. 5. ( 2 )  OJ L 69, 11.3.2019, p. 51. ( 3 )  OJ L 146, 5.6.2019, p. 104. ( 4 )  OJ L 189, 15.7.2019, p. 69. ( 5 )  OJ L 230, 6.9.2019, p. 2.

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 31 (Thursday, February 18, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 10116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4512-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]


Virginia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4512-DR), dated April 2, 2020, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on January 20, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Janice P. 
Barlow, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of MaryAnn Tierney as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Robert J. Fenton,
Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Administrator, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-03315 Filed 2-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60649

Summary Calendar

__________________

BERTA JULIETA GUZMAN-BARRIOS; CARLOS

HUMBERTO CATALAN-GUSMAN; CELIA FERNANDA 

CATALAN-GUSMAN; EDGAR ROLANDO CATALAN-BARRIOS,

 Petitioners,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

A72 409 075

A29 415 720

A29 415 721

A29 415 722

- - - - - - - - - -

July 1, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Berta Julieta Guzman-Barrios (Berta) and her children,

Carlos Humberto Catalan-Gusman, Celia Fernanda Catalan-Gusman,

and Edgar Rolando Catalan-Barrios, petition for review of the
No. 95-60649

-2-

Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) order denying the petitions

for asylum and suspension of deportation. 

In challenging the asylum ruling, the petitioners argue that

the BIA ignored the enormous amount of circumstantial evidence

and improperly focused on certain facts in the record. They

contend that the past activities of Berta's husband, brother,

sister, and deceased brother-in-law have been imputed on Berta by

the Guatemalan government and that if she and her children return

to Guatemala, they will be subjected to further persecution. The

evidence of record does not compel a contrary conclusion than

that reached by the BIA, and there is substantial evidence to

support the BIA's findings. See Ozdemir v. INS, 46 F.3d 6, 7-8

(5th Cir. 1994). 

In challenging the BIA's ruling on Berta's application for

suspension of deportation, Berta argues that the BIA erred in

viewing her two absences from the United States as constituting

meaningful interruption of her continuous physical presence in

this country. There is substantial evidence to support the BIA's

finding. Cf. Rodriguez-Gutierrez v. INS, 59 F.3d 504, 507 (5th

Cir. 1995). Because the issue was neither raised by petitioners

in the administrative proceedings nor addressed by the BIA in its

ruling, we do not consider the petitioners' arguments concerning

the applicability of the ABC Settlement Agreement pursuant to

American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh, 760 F. Supp. 796 (N.D.
No. 95-60649

-3-

Cal. 1991). See Miranda-Lores v. INS, 17 F.3d 84, 85 (5th Cir.

1994).

The petition for review is DENIED.
# C_2017327EN.01000801.xml

| 29.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 September 2017

(2017/C 327/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1778 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4402 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87635 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5800 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1460 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3575 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,041 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3122 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6003 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1994 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5054 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4684 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1977 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6363 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6010 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 350,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9189 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8436 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4975 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 892,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9839 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,998 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,3855 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,327 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7484 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3956 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,1150 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1778

JPY

Japanese yen

132,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4402

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87635

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5800

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1460

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3575

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,041

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3122

RON

Romanian leu

4,6003

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1994

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5054

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4684

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1977

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6363

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6010

KRW

South Korean won

1 350,15

ZAR

South African rand

15,9189

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8436

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4975

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 892,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9839

PHP

Philippine peso

59,998

RUB

Russian rouble

68,3855

THB

Thai baht

39,327

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7484

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3956

INR

Indian rupee

77,1150

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program**

- Title V, Part A of the Higher Education Act, as amended ( 20 U.S.C. 1101-1101d; 1103-1103g ) 

## Regulations

- 34 CFR Part 606
- The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99 apply to both programs.

Institutional Service Home