alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 52.247-38 F.o.b. Inland Carrier, Point of Exportation.

As prescribed in 47.303-10(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when the delivery term is f.o.b. inland carrier, point of exportation:

# F.o.b. Inland Carrier, Point of Exportation (FEB 2006)

(a) The term *f.o.b. inland carrier, point of exportation,* as used in this clause, means free of expense to the Government, on board the conveyance of the inland carrier, delivered to the specified point of exportation.

(b) The Contractor shall—

(1)(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance with carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable transportation charge;

(2) Prepare and distribute commercial bills of lading or other transportation receipt;

(3)(i) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition in or on the conveyance of the carrier on the date or within the period specified; and

(ii) Pay and bear all applicable charges, including transportation costs, to the point of delivery specified in the contract;

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the shipment to the point of delivery in the contract; and

(5) At the Government's request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for (i) exportation or (ii) importation at destination.

(End of clause)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 71 FR 207, Jan. 3, 2006]
#### 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options.

As prescribed in 17.208(c), insert a provision substantially the same as the following:

# Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(End of provision)

[53 FR 17860, May 18, 1988, as amended at 55 FR 25532, June 21, 1990; 69 FR 59704, Oct. 5, 2004]
#### Elinda ORTEGA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-10848

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 5, 2008.

Dorsett Carter Bennett, Bennett Law Office, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ann Cruce Roberts, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Elinda Ortega seeks disability benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denied her application. Both the Appeals Council and the district court affirmed.

An individual is disabled under the Social Security Act if his “physical or mental impairments” preclude him from “en-gag[ing] in any ... kind of substantial gainful work which exists in the national economy.” 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2)(A). The ALJ found that Ortega was not disabled because she could perform various light-work jobs that existed in significant numbers in the national economy. While the opinion of Ortega’s treating physician arguably supported her claim, the ALJ concluded that substantial evidence showed that Ortega was not disabled. Ortega contends that the ALJ erred because substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s ruling, and the ALJ improperly considered the testimony of the vocational expert.

“This Court limits its review of a denial of disability insurance benefits to two issues: (1) whether the [ALJ] applied the proper legal standards, and (2) whether the [ALJ’s] decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.” *Anthony v. Sullivan,*954 F.2d 289, 292 (5th Cir.1992). After a careful review of the record, we find that the ALJ applied the proper legal standards, and substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s ruling. Therefore, we AFFIRM.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
----

| 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the “Companies”) for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Steven V. Lant                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Steven V. Lant                                    |
|   | Chairman of the Board, President and              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer of CH Energy Group, Inc.  |
|   |                                              |
|   |                                              |
|   |                                              |
|   | /s/ Steven V. Lant                                |
|   | Steven V. Lant                                    |
|   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation  |

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Pyrite deposits at HorseshoeBay, Latouche Island, Alaska**
 
Report | Plates: 01
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1024-E
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000965249
 
October 22, 2018
#### 3001.103 Authority.

The HSAR is issued by DHS's Chief Procurement Officer, who is the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), see 41 U.S.C. 1702 and DHS Delegation Number 0702, under authority of 5 U.S.C. 301-302, the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, Pub. L. No. 93-400, 88 Stat. 796 (1974), including sections 22 and 25, 41 U.S.C. 1707, 1302 and 1303, and (FAR) 48 CFR part 1, subpart 1.3.

[77 FR 50632, Aug. 22, 2012]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: The Mentoring Toolkit 2.0: Resources for Developing Programs for Incarcerated Youth      

# Resource: The Mentoring Toolkit 2.0: Resources for Developing Programs for Incarcerated Youth

This toolkit, developed by the National Technical Assistance Center for the Education of Neglected or Delinquent Children and Youth, provides information, program descriptions, and links to important resources that can assist juvenile correctional facilities and other organizations with designing effective mentoring programs for neglected and delinquent youth, particularly those who are incarcerated. **Learn more.**
# C_2018300EN.01000401.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

24 August 2018

(2018/C 300/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1588 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90200 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5843 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1398 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 125,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6938 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,744 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,30 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2788 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6393 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,0204 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5868 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5143 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0965 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7384 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5863 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 292,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,5129 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9326 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4385 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 950,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7500 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,882 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 78,2390 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,887 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,7375 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,9191 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,0115 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1588

JPY

Japanese yen

128,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90200

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5843

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1398

ISK

Iceland króna

125,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6938

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,744

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,30

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2788

RON

Romanian leu

4,6393

TRY

Turkish lira

7,0204

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5868

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5143

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0965

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7384

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5863

KRW

South Korean won

1 292,41

ZAR

South African rand

16,5129

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9326

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4385

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 950,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7500

PHP

Philippine peso

61,882

RUB

Russian rouble

78,2390

THB

Thai baht

37,887

BRL

Brazilian real

4,7375

MXN

Mexican peso

21,9191

INR

Indian rupee

81,0115

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2359

BERNARD OBI EFFIOM,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, 

Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant 

Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, 

Christina Bechak Parascandola, Office of Immigration Litigation, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Obi Effiom, a native and citizen of Cameroon, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

(“Board”) order denying his motion to reopen his case sua 

sponte. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011). We lack jurisdiction 

to review the Board’s refusal to exercise its sua sponte 

authority to reopen and therefore dismiss the petition for 

review. See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400–01 (4th Cir.

2009).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
#### 432.703 Contract funding requirements.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6594** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. CRAIG A. MURPHY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis trict of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:96

- cr - 00066

- REP

- 17 )

Submitted : August 29, 2011 Decided: September 13, 2011

Before MOTZ and DAVIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un publ ished per curiam opinion
. Craig A. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. David Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Craig A. Murphy appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion s to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006) and pursuant to the All Writs Act . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated b y the district
court. United States v. Murphy , No. 3:96

- cr - 00066

- REP

- 17 (E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2011)
. We have rev iewed Murphy’s challenge to his sentence under the All Writs Act and conclude that this extraordinary remedy is not available in this instance. S ee United States v. Carlisle , 517 U.S. 416, 429 (1996) ; United
States v. Torres , 282 F.3d 1241, 1245 (10th Cir. 2002)
. Accordingly, the distr ict court properly denied Murphy’s motion for that relief . Finally, w e dispense with oral argument because the fa cts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Guide for Drafting or Revising Tribal Juvenile Delinquency and Status Offense Laws      

# Resource: Guide for Drafting or Revising Tribal Juvenile Delinquency and Status Offense Laws

This guide (PDF, 636 pages) assists Tribal governments with creating, re-evaluating, and strengthening their juvenile codes. This resource was written and updated with the belief that Tribal governments are increasingly reassuming responsibility for their youth and are determined to ensure Native youth benefit from responsible guidance. It was developed to provide a starting point for Tribal governments to reference when drafting or revising statutory language pertaining to juvenile offenses. **Learn more.**
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 20, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 20, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0203. THE CITY OF SAVANNAH v. MARGARET BRANTLEY et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: STCV1601885
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,545
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               6,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    15,706
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         17,198
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           17,135
<LOANS>                                        126,836
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,356
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,550
<DEPOSITS>                                     162,635
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,628
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,171
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 179,550
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                10,472
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               321
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               12,793
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4,953
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          7,840
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (17)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,291
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2,291
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.66
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,596
<LOANS-PAST>                                   157
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,576
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,311
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  173
<RECOVERIES>                                   98
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,356
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,356
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        961



</TABLE>
47.505 Construction contracts. ( a ) Except as stated in paragraph (b) below, construction contractors, including subcontractors and suppliers, engaged in overseas work shall comply with the policies and regulations in this subpart.
( b ) These requirements shall not apply to military assistance, foreign aid, or similar projects under the auspices of the U.S. Government when the recipient nation furnishes, or pays for, at least 50 percent of the transportation, in which event foreign-flag vessels may be used for a portion not to exceed 50 percent of the gross tonnage for the project.