10334 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 32 / Friday, February 19, 2021 / Notices 

The ICTAP Training Survey will not 

collect any personal identifiable 

information (PII) from respondents 

(emergency communications 

stakeholders) of the survey. In collecting 

feedback regarding the ITSL, COML, 

and COMT courses, the survey will 

collect what state the respondent lives, 

where they took the course, did the 

course provide the information needed, 

should the course curriculum be 

updated, and any comments to improve 

the course material. The survey will 

encompass 10 questions regarding the 

former student’s experience, anything 

that they liked, disliked, or something 

new that they would like to see 

incorporated into the refreshed class. It 

is estimated that it will take each 

participant 10 minutes to complete the 

training survey. For 300 respondents 

annually, the burden is 50 hours. To 

estimate the cost of this collection, CISA 

uses the mean hourly wage of ‘‘All 

Occupations’’ of $25.72. CISA then 

applies a load factor of 1.4597 to this 

average wage to obtain a fully loaded 

average hourly wage of $37.54. The total 

respondent cost burden for this 

collection is $1,877 (50 hours × $37.54). 

This is a NEW collection of 

information. 

The Office of Management and Budget 

is particularly interested in comments 

which: 

1. Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

4. Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

Analysis 

Agency: Cybersecurity and 

Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), 

Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS). 

Title of Collection: Interoperable 

Communications and Technical 

Assistance Program (ICTAP) Training 

Survey. 

OMB Control Number: 1670–NEW. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Affected Public: State, Local, Tribal, 

and Territorial Governments. 

Number of Annualized Respondents: 

300. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 10 

Minutes. 

Total Annualized Burden Hours: 50 

hours. 

Total Annualized Respondent 

Opportunity Cost: $1,877.16. 

Total Annualized Respondent Out-ofPocket: $0. 

Total Annualized Government Cost: 

$4,082.67. 

Samuel Vazquez, 

Acting Chief Information Officer, Department 

of Homeland Security, Cybersecurity and 

Infrastructure Security Agency. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03404 Filed 2–18–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P 

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND 

WATER COMMISSION, UNITED 

STATES AND MEXICO 

Notice of Availability of an Amended 

Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) 

and Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI) for Aquatic Habitat 

Restoration in the Rio Grande 

Canalization Project 

AGENCY: United States Section, 

International Boundary and Water 

Commission, United States and Mexico 

(USIBWC).ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 

1969, the Council on Environmental 

Quality Final Regulations, and USIBWC 

Operational Procedures for 

Implementing Section 102 of NEPA, 

published in the Federal Register 

September 2, 1981, the USIBWC hereby 

gives notice that the amended Draft 

Environmental Assessment (EA) and 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI) for Aquatic Habitat Restoration 

in the Rio Grande Canalization Project 

is available. The EA seeks to identify, 

develop, and design aquatic projects to 

implement aquatic habitat, wetland, and 

riparian habitat restoration for the Rio 

Grande Canalization Project (RGCP). An 

Environmental Impact Statement will 

not be prepared unless additional 

information which may affect this 

decision is brought to our attention 

within 30 days from the date of this 

Notice. 

DATES: Public Comments: USIBWC will 

consider substantive comments from the 

public and stakeholders for 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. 

Please note all written and email 

comments received during the comment 

period will become part of the public 

record, including any personal 

information you may provide. Before 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. All submissions from 

organizations or businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, will be 

made available for public disclosure in 

their entirety. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent 

to: Elizabeth Verdecchia, Natural 

Resources Specialist, USIBWC, 4191 N 

Mesa; El Paso, Texas 79902. Telephone: 

(915) 832–4701, Fax: (915) 493–2428, 

email: Elizabeth.Verdecchia@ibwc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Verdecchia, Natural Resources 

Specialist, Telephone: (915) 832–4701, 

email: Elizabeth.Verdecchia@ibwc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 4, 

2009, the USIBWC issued a Record of 

Decision (ROD) on the long-term 

management of the RGCP in southern 

New Mexico and western Texas. The 

ROD committed the USIBWC to the 

restoration of aquatic and riparian 

habitat at up to 30 sites over 10 years 

(through 2019). In May 2019, the 

USIBWC prepared a Draft EA to analyze 

the potential impact of seven action 

alternatives and a No Action Alternative 

to implement aquatic habitat within the 

RGCP, and the USIBWC extended the 

comment period (Federal Register July 

22, 2019). After public input and 

subsequent development of preliminary 

designs, USIBWC re-evaluated 

alternative sites for aquatic habitat and 

assessed the feasibility of three 

additional sites, two of which were 

added to the EA. The USIBWC has 

prepared an Amended Draft EA, which 

evaluates potential impacts of ten 

alternatives, including the No Action 

Alternative and the following sites: Yeso 

Arroyo, Angostura Arroyo, Broad 

Canyon Arroyo, Selden Point Bar, Las 

Cruces Effluent, Mesilla Valley Bosque 

State Park, Downstream of Courchesne 

Bridge, Trujillo Restoration Site, and 

Montoya Intercepting Drain. 

Restoration actions could include 

invasive vegetation removal, native 

vegetation planting, overbank lowering, 

bank cuts, natural levee breaches, 

secondary channels, bank 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 32 / Friday, February 19, 2021 / Notices 10335 

destabilization, channel widening, 

arroyo mouth management, construction 

of inset floodplains, construction of 

wetland depressions, and use of 

supplemental water for on-site 

irrigation. 

Based on a review of the facts and 

analyses contained in the Amended 

Draft EA, the USIBWC has selected five 

projects as the Preferred Alternatives: 

Alternative D—Broad Canyon Arroyo, 

Alternative F—Las Cruces Effluent, 

Alternative G—Mesilla Valley Bosque 

State Park (MVBSP), Alternative H— 

Downstream of Courchesne Bridge, and 

Alternative J—Trujillo Arroyo. 

Alternatives Las Cruces Effluent and 

Downstream of Courchesne Bridge 

would require engineering designs prior 

to construction, while Alternatives 

Broad Canyon Arroyo and Trujillo 

Restoration Site, which are smaller and 

less complicated projects, could be 

constructed from conceptual designs. 

Downstream of Courchesne Bridge 

would be implemented as part of 

compensatory mitigation for future 

levee improvement projects. All 

alternatives would require appropriate 

permits from the United States Army 

Corps of Engineers for dredge and fill of 

Waters of the United States, per the 

Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401. 

Potential impacts on natural, cultural, 

and other resources were evaluated in 

the Draft EA. The USIBWC has prepared 

a FONSI for the Preferred Alternatives, 

based on a review of the facts and 

analyses contained in the amended 

Draft EA. 

Availability: The electronic version of 

the amended Draft EA is available at the 

USIBWC web page: https://

www.ibwc.gov/EMD/EIS_EA_Public_

Comment.html. 

Dated: February 10, 2021. 

Jennifer Pen ̃ a, 

Chief Legal Counsel, International Boundary 

and Water Commission, United States 

Section. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03303 Filed 2–18–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7010–01–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1217] 

Enforcement Proceeding; Certain 

Blowers and Components Thereof; 

Notice of Institution of Formal 

Enforcement Proceeding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has instituted a formal 

enforcement proceeding relating to the 

Consent Order issued on November 12, 

2020, in the above-referenced 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted the original 

investigation on September 8, 2020, 

based on a complaint filed by Regal 

Beloit America, Inc (‘‘Regal’’) of Beloit, 

Wisconsin. 85 FR 55491–92 (Sep. 8, 

2020). The complaint alleged violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain blowers and components thereof 

by reason of infringement of one or 

more of claims 1, 2, 7–10, and 15 of U.S. 

Patent No. 8,079,834 (‘‘the ’834 patent’’). 

Id. at 55492. The Commission’s notice 

of investigation named as respondents 

East West Manufacturing, LLC of 

Atlanta, Georgia, and East West 

Industries of Binh Duong, Vietnam 

(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). Id. at 

55492. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) did not 

participate as a party in the original 

investigation. Id. 

On October 14, 2020, Respondents 

filed a motion to terminate the 

investigation with respect to themselves 

based upon a consent order stipulation. 

The motion included a consent order 

stipulation and a proposed consent 

order. 

On October 22, 2020, the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued 

an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting 

the motion and terminating the 

investigation with respect to 

Respondents based on the entry of a 

consent order. Order No. 6 at 3 (Oct. 22, 

2020). Thereafter, the Commission 

determined not to review the ID and 

issued a Consent Order. 85 FR 73511 

(Nov. 18, 2020). Respondents were 

therefore terminated from the original 

investigation and the investigation was 

terminated in its entirety. Id. 

On January 15, 2021, Regal filed a 

complaint requesting that the 

Commission institute a formal 

enforcement proceeding under 

Commission Rule 210.75 to investigate 

the alleged violation of the Consent 

Order by Respondents. 

Having examined the enforcement 

complaint and the supporting 

documents, the Commission has 

determined to institute a formal 

enforcement proceeding, pursuant to 19 

CFR 210.75(a), to determine whether a 

violation of the Consent Order, issued 

on November 12, 2020, in the original 

investigation has occurred and to 

determine what, if any, enforcement 

measures are appropriate. The named 

respondents are East West 

Manufacturing, LLC of Atlanta, Georgia, 

and East West Industries of Binh Duong, 

Vietnam. OUII is also named as a party. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on February 

16, 2021. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

p10. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 16, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03409 Filed 2–18–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Milad I. Shaker, M.D.; Decision and 

Order 

On October 5, 2020, the Assistant 

Administrator, Diversion Control 

Division, Drug Enforcement 

Administration (hereinafter, 

Government), signed an Order to Show 

Cause (hereinafter, OSC) addressed to 

Milad I. Shaker, M.D. (hereinafter, 

Registrant). OSC, at 1. The OSC 

proposed the revocation of Registrant’s 

Certificate of Registration No. 

FS1471818. Id. It alleged that Registrant 

is without ‘‘authority to handle 

controlled substances in the State of 

Pennsylvania, the state in which 

[Registrant is] registered with DEA.’’ 

OSC, at 2 (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3)). 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES