April 17, 2015

Exemption No. 11379 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 0059

Mr. Matthew J. Clark Counsel for Vine Rangers, Inc. McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP 1676 International Drive, Penthouse McLean, VA 22102

Dear Mr. Clark:

This letter is to inform you that we have gran ted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you th e conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 13, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Vine Rangers, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The exemption would allow the petitioner to opera te an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct precision agriculture, surveys, imaging, and inspections.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a 3D R obotics RTF X8 and the 3D Robotics Aero-M.2

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates . In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, a nd limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the S ecretary of Transportation has de termined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, th e FAA finds that the re quested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is
not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial da ta collection. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all materi al respects to those pr esented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption N o. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab, Inc. ( see Docket No.

FAA

− 2014

− 0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifica tions described by the petition er and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of signi ficantly greater proporti ons, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gi ves the FAA good cause to find th at the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for re questing an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously re quested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 also apply to the situ ation you present; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a gr ant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S. C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Vine Rangers, Inc. is granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a )(1), 91.409(a)(1) an d (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Vine Rangers, Inc. is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions an d limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of ex emption are limited to the 3D Robotics RTF

X8 and the 3D Robotics Aero-M when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restricti on. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PI C and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; electronic messaging or texting is not perm itted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must en sure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepa ncy exists between the conditions and limitations in this exemption and the pro cedures outlined in the operating documents,4

the conditions and limitations herein ta ke precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the pr ocedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revi se its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and pr esent updated and revised documents to the Administrator or any la w enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present updated and revise d documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

− 80) may be contacted if questi ons arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that aff ect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e .g. replacement of a flight cr itical component, must undergo a functional test flight prio r to conducting further opera tions under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at least 500 feet from other people. The functi onal test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. Th e pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e .g. inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manu facturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exempti on must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC mu st hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pi lot certificate. The PIC must also hold a

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Colombia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PI C is rated on his or her pilot certificate.5

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to ope rate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a ma nner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distan ces from persons, vessels, vehi cles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (training, proficiency, and e xperience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted dur ing dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and expe rience-building flights, al l persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonpartic ipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparti cipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditi ons (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rule s (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical mile s of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facil ity Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the ai rport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a pre-determined location within the pr ivate or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the even t of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a f light unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the intended operation and to operate after that fo r at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Author ization (COA). All operations shall be conducted in accorda nce with an ATO-issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct operations that cannot be conducted unde r the terms of the attached COA.6

22. All aircraft operated in accord ance with this exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N

− Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure th e safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These

documents must be made available to th e Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give wa y to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently pr otect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or struct ures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or es sential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over priv ate or controlled-access property with permission from the property owner/cont roller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Sa fety Board (NTSB) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.7

If this exemption permits operations for th e purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM)

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction ove r the area of proposed filming. The 3-day notification may be waived w ith the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person res ponsible for the on-s cene operation of the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N

− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PI Cs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtain ed permission from property owners

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made av ailable to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holde r or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, includi ng maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which film ing will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer th an 500 feet from pa rticipating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with al l applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight St andards ServiceAlbany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse McLean, VA 22102
Tel: 703.336.8800 mckennalong.com Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

MARK E. MCKINNON

703.336.8708 EMAIL ADDRESS mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

January 13, 2014

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition of Vine Rangers, Inc. for an Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of the

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

To Whom it May Concern:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ("Reform Act") and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Vine Rangers hereby applies for an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") identified below, to allow comm ercial agricultural operations of small unmanned aerial vehicles ( i.e., "small unmanned aircraft" or "UAS").

This petition for exemption is made based on information outlined in this Petition for Exemption, as well as the accompanying Vine Rangers' UAS Ope rations Manual (hereinafter "Vine Rangers' Ops Manual") and 3D Robotics RTF X8 UAS Manuals (collectively referred to as "Manufacturer's Manuals"). Vine Rangers submits these supporting materials as confidential documents pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b), as the materials contain confidential commercial and/or proprietary information that Vine Rangers has not and will not share with others. Additionally, these documents contain operating conditions and procedures that are not generally available to the pub lic and are protected from release under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq. , and any other requirements established by the FAA pursuant to Section 333

of the Reform Act.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 2

For your convenience, this Petition is organized as follows:

I

. Description of Petitioner

II. Description of Proposed Operations

III. Relevant Statutory Authority

IV. Vine Rangers' Proposed UAS Operations Meet the Requirements of Section 333 of

the Reform Act

A. Approval is Warranted Based on the UAS's Size, Weight, Speed, and Operational Capability

B. Approval is Warranted Based on the Operational Restrictions Set Forth in the Ops Manual

V. Regulations From Which Exemption is Requested

A. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H

– Airworthiness Certificates and 14 C.F.R. § 91.203

B. 14 C.F.R. Part 27 Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category

Rotorcraft

C. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness

D. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft and 14 C.F.R. § 91.203(a ) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration

E. 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a): Aircraft Marking and Identification Requirements

F. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action

G. 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a): Flight Instruct ion

H. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes

I. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings

J. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR

Conditions

K. 14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2); 91.417(a) and (b): Maintenance Inspections

L. 14 C.F.R. Part 61, 14 C.F.R. § 61.3, 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations

VI. Drug and Alcohol Program

VII. Public Interest

VIII. Privacy

IX. Federal Register Summary

X. ConclusionU.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 3

I. D ESCRIP TION OF P ETITIONER

Based in the wine country of Santa Ynez Valley, California, and founded by David Baeza, Vine Rangers seeks to leverage the latest UAS technologies and analytics infrastructure to help improve the quality, consistency and yield of specia lty crops, particularly, wine grapes. Building upon its already existing relationships and contacts with the University of California, Santa Barbara ("UCSB"), Vine Rangers intends to work in conjunction with UCSB's Smart Farm Initiative program to analyze and process the precision agriculture data that it collects.

The farmer's ability to gather and process information on the health of their crops is critical to ensuring the crop's uniform quality and yield. This is particularly true for winemakers as vines take years to mature, and wine grapes are only harvested once per year. Thus, there is only one chance to get it right. Vine Rangers' UASs will empower the farmer to make informed proactive, rather than reactive, decisions. This proactive decis ion making allows today's farmers and growers to deploy their limited resources in a more efficient, effective, and environmentally

sustainable manner.

Vine Rangers' UASs will be equipped with state

- of

- the

- art equipment capable of capturing near

- infra red and thermal images in the vineyard. This data allows farmers to identify patches of disease

- ridden vines and assists with water, irrigation, soil, pesticide and fertilization management. The ability to pinpoint and precision spray pesticides, rather than spray the entire vineyard, reduces the risk of human exposure to pesticide. This also helps mitigate the negative

side

- effects on the local ecology from pesticides which, for example, impact the h oney b ee, commonly referred to as Colony Collapse Diso rder.

Vine Rangers is dedicated to providing technologically driven and innovative solutions to getting farmers and growers the information they need to make informed decisions that will allow them to produce better crops in a more sustainable and env ironmentally conscious manner. To that end, Vine Rangers seeks an exemption to use UASs for the commercial purpose of performing precision agricultural, surveys, imaging and inspections.

The contact information for Petitioner is as follows:

David B aeza
, CEO Vine Rangers, Inc. 2120 High Meadow Road Solvang, CA 93463

805

- 686

- 4858

Email: baeza.david@gmail.com or davi d.baeza@vinerangers.com mailto:baeza.david@gmail.comU.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 4

II. D ESCRIPTION OF P ROPOSED O PERATION

Vine Rangers intends to use small UASs weighing less than 55 pounds for the purpose of conducting aerial surveys a nd inspections of wine vineyards and other specialty crops. All UAS operations will occur under tightly controlled conditions on privately owned vineyards and farms

at the owner ' s request and consent. These vineyards and farms are generally located in ru ral valleys away from people, crowds, and buildings. The proposed UAS operations will be conducted in accordance with the conditions and limitations of this Petition for Exemption and Vine Rangers' Ops Manual. Among other things, Vine Rangers' proposed U AS operations will be limited to daytime VFR conditions in uncontrolled airspace , and will occur at altitudes at or

below 400 feet AGL and at least 5 miles away from any airport.

Traditionally, imaging technology from the agricultural survey and in spection industry has had to rely on the use of full

- scale rotorcraft or fixed

- wing aircraft. These aerial surveys and inspections have afforded farmers and growers with the critical information like imaging that they need to maximize crop yield, in a con servative and sustainable manner. However

, conventional operations using rotorcraft and fixed

- wing aircraft in low level operations present risks associated with vehicles weighing thousands of pounds and carrying large amounts of fuel. It is important t o note that the use of small UAS will not only provide information in a more cost efficient, sustainable, and ultimately, much safer manner, but the quality of the information will be far superior. For example, the use of small UASs can provide improved r esolution and flexibility in imaging as low

- flying UASs can collect sub

- millimeter resolution crop images that support analysis that is not possible with satellite or aircraft images. In the vineyard context, small UASs will be capable of capturing canopy images from both above the rows, and also at the canopy level

— something that is impossible to do using conventional aircraft.

III. R ELEVANT S TATUTORY A UTHORITY

This Petition for Exemption is submitted pursuant to Section 333(a) through (c) of the

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ("Reform Act"). Congress has directed the FAA "to safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system." Pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act, the FAA Administrat or is to permit unmanned aircraft systems to operate in the National Air Space ("NAS") where it is safe to do so based on the following considerations:

● The UAS's size, weight, speed and operational capability;

● Operation of the UAS in close proximity to ai rports and populated areas; andU.S. Department of Transportation

Ja nuary 13, 2014 Page 5

● Operation of the UAS within the visual line of sight of the operator.

Additionally, the FAA Administrator has general authority to grant exemptions from the agency's safety regulations and minimum standards when the Adminis trator decides a requested exemption is in the public interest. See 49 U.S.C. § 106(f) (defining the authority of the Administrator); 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f) (permitting exemptions from §§ 44701(a), (b) and §§ 44702

– 44716, et seq. ). A party requesting an exemption must explain the reasons why the exemption: (1) would benefit the public as a whole, and (2) would not adversely affect safety (or how it would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rules). See 14 C.F.R. § 11.81 (petitions for exemption).

IV. V INE R ANGERS ' P ROPOSED UAS O PERATIONS M EET THE R EQUIREMENTS OF

_ S ECTION 333 OF THE R EFORM A CT

The small UAS operations proposed by Vine Rangers in this Petition for Exemption qualify for expedited approval pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act as each of the statutory criteria

and relevant factors are satisfied.

A. Approval is Warranted Based on the UAS's Size, Weight, Speed, and Operational Capability

Vine Rangers will only employ small UASs that meet the following characterist ics to perform the operations described in this Petition for Exemption:

● The unmanned aircraft ("UA") will weigh less than 20 pounds, including all equipment and payloads;

● The UA will not be flown at a speed in excess of 25 knots;

● The UA will not be flow n at an altitude that exceeds 400 feet AGL;

● All flights will be flown in such a way that they can be safely terminated with a reserve battery power of 20% of the battery's maximum charge;

● Altitude information will be generated by equipment onboard the UA as specified using GPS triangulation, digitally encoded barometric altimeter, radio altimeter, or any combination thereof. This information will be transmitted to the pilot via telemetric data

feed.

● The UAS will have system redundancies and ind ependent functionality to ensure the overall safety and predictability of the system. If connection to the remote control orU.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 6

ground control station is lost, failsafe systems will permit the UAS to return to a predetermined location and safely land without injury or damage.

● The radio frequencies used for operations and control of the UAS will comply with the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

B. Approval is Warranted Based on the Oper ational Restrictions Set Forth in the Ops Manual

The Vine Rangers' Ops Manual and the Manufacturer's Manual 1 for the selected UAS will contain all the procedures and limitations necessary to safely and successfully perform the operations specified in thi s Petition for Exemption. To assist the FAA in making a safety assessment of Vine Rangers' proposed operations, below is a summary of operational limitations and conditions that will ensure an equivalent or higher level of safety to operations conducted

u nder current regulatory guidelines:

1. The UAS weighs less than 20 pounds, fully loaded.

2. Minimum crew for each operation will consist of a pilot, who will be Pilot

- in Command ("PIC") of the UAS, and one or more Visual Observers ("Observer") as

necessary t o safely conduct the mission.

3. The UAS shall be operated within Visual Line of Sight ("VLOS") of the PIC and Observer at all times. The PIC must use human vision unaided by any device

other than corrective lenses.

4. The Observer designated for any oper ation will be in constant voice contact with

the PIC.

5. The additional requirements identified in the exemption grant shall be added to the Vine Rangers' Ops Manual. The Ops Manual will be maintained and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations in the granted exemptions and the Vine Rangers' Ops Manual, the conditions and limitations in the granted exemptions shall take

1 The term "Manufacturer's Manual" includes all relevant manufacturer publications, inclu ding, but not limited to: operations and flight manuals, user guides, component maintenance manuals, pilot training manuals, service information letters and, safety/service bulletins.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 7

precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, Vine Rangers' must foll ow the

procedures outlined in their Ops Manual.

6. Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be limited to the amount of time the UAS can be flown and still maintain a reserve battery power

of no less than 20%.

7. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL and will never enter navigable controlled airspace without prior written authorization and approval from the FAA.

8. Flights will be operated at a lateral distance of at least 500 feet from any nonparticipating persons, u nless that person is in a position where he or she is shielded from the UAS and any possible debris resulting from UAS failure. Flight will be terminated if a nonparticipating person within 500 feet of the UAS leaves a shielded position. At no time will the UAS be conducted so close to persons or objects to present an undue hazard to the PIC or Observer, per § 91.119(a).

9. Flights will be limited to a speed of 25 knots.

10. Prior to each flight the PIC shall inspect the UAS to confirm that it is in a

conditi on safe for flight. The PIC shall not operate the UAS if the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station ("GCS") shall be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alternations must be properly documented in the

UAS records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight character istics ( e.g ., replacement of a flight critical component) must undergo a functional test flight in accordance with Vine Rangers' Ops Manual. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the UAS aircraft records of the flight. The requirements and procedures for a functional test flight and UAS record entry shall be included in the Vine Rangers' Ops Manual.

12. The UAS will be operated and maintained according to the Manufacturer's Manuals and any required manufacturer Safety/Service B ulletins.

13. Prior to the operation, there will be a Mission Plan setting forth the operational limitations and conditions for the mission, as well as key personnel contact information and a description of any potential hazards on or in the vicinity of the

s urvey site.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 8

14. Vine Rangers will obtain an Air Traffic Organization ("ATO") issued Certificate

of Waiver or Authorization, otherwise known as a COA, prior to conducting any operations under this grant of exemption. This COA will require Vine Rangers to

requ est a Notice to Airman ("NOTAM") with an appropriate ATC facility between 48 and 72 hours before the flight.

15. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fir e or other appropriate governmental agencies.

16. Vine Rangers will coordinate its operations with the Van Nuys Flight Standards District Office ("FSDO"), or other appropriate local FSDO. This requirement may be waived or modified by agreement with the applic able FSDO.

17. If the UAS loses communication with the pilot, it will have the capability to

return to a pre

- determined location within the operational area and land safely.

18. Contingency plans will be in place to safely terminate flight if there is a loss of

communication between the PIC and the Observer.

19. The UAS will have the capability to safely abort flight in the case of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. PICs and Observers will have at least a current Class III Medical Certificate.

21. Operations shall oc cur during daytime VFR Meteorological Conditions; flights under special visual flight rules ("SVFR") shall not be conducted.

22. The UA shall remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations and activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.).

23. UAS Operations under Instrument Flight Rules, at night, or beyond VLOS are prohibited.

V. R EGULATIONS F ROM W HICH E XEMPTION I S R EQUESTED

The Federal Avi ation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority, by its terms, includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is definedU.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 9

under § 40101 of the Act, including UASs, from its safety regulations and minimum stand ards when the Administrator decides a requested exemption is in the public interest. 2

Vine Rangers seeks an exemption from several interrelated provisions of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations ("14 C.F.R") Parts 21, 45, 61 and 91 for purposes of conducting the requested operations using a UAS. Listed below are: 1) the specific sections of 14 C.F.R for which exemption is sought, and 2) the operating procedures and safeguards that Petitioner has established which will ensure a level of safety bett er than or equal to the rules from which exemption is sought. 3

A. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H

– Airworthiness Certificates and 14 C.F.R. § 91.203(a)(1)

The FAA has stated that no exemption is needed from this section if a finding is made

under the Reform Act that the UAS selected provides an equivalent level of safety when compared to aircraft normally used for the same application. These criteria are met, and therefore no exemption is needed. See Grant of Exemption to Astraeus Aerial, Docket No. FAA

2014

- 0352 at 13

- 14, 22. If, however, the FAA determines that there are some characteristics of the chosen UAS that fail to meet the requirements of the Reform Act, an exemption is requested.

Equivalent Level of Safety

The UASs that Vine Rangers will use are safe when taking into account their size, weight, speed, and operational capability. As set forth in the description of proposed operations in Section II, the UAS weighs less than 55 pounds and will be flown at less than 50 knots and complet ely outside controlled airspace. Additionally, the UASs carry neither pilots nor passengers, carry no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operate exclusively within the parameters stated in the Ops Manual.

Operations conducted under th is exemption will be closely controlled and monitored by the operator and will be conducted in compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide security for the area of operation. Vine Rangers will also provide the FAA with advance

2 See 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f) (authorizing the grant of exemptions from r equirements of regulations prescribed pursuant to Sections 44701(a) and (b) and Sections 44702

- 44716).

3 See 14 C.F.R § 11.81(e), which requires a petition for exemption to include:

The reasons why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety , or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek exemption.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 10

notice of a ll operations via NOTAMs and coordination with the local FSDO, as necessary. In all cases, the UAS operated under the proposed conditions will be at least as safe as, or safer than

, conventional rotorcraft operating with an airworthiness certificate.

Fu rther, the UAS does not need a means to communicate with other aircraft or ATC, because those capabilities will be possessed by the PIC and Observer, who are not onboard the

UAS. See Grant of Exemption, Docket FAA

- 2014

- 0352 at 13. In addition, no sense

- a nd

- avoid technology is necessary for the UAS because it will be operated at all times in VFR conditions and within VLOS of the PIC and Operator. See id.

B. 14 C.F.R. Part 27 Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category

Rotorcraft

Title 14 C.F.R. Par t 27 sets forth the procedural requirements for airworthiness certification of normal category rotorcraft. To the extent that Vine Rangers' small UASs would otherwise require certification under Part 27, Petitioner seeks an exemption from Part 27's

airwor thiness standards for the same reasons identified in the request for exemption from 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, supra

.

C. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness

Inasmuch as there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the UAS, Vine R angers seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a), which requires that a civil aircraft be in airworthy condition to be operated. The FAA has stated that no exemption is required for 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a) to the extent that the requirements of Part 21 are waived or found inapplicable. See Grant of Exemption to Astraeus Aerial, Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352 at 13

- 14, 22. Accordingly, Petitioner requests that the requirements for § 91.7(a) be treated in accordance with Section V(A), supra.

D. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b )(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft and 14 C.F.R. § 91.203(a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration

Title 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2) and § 91.203(a) and (b) require the operator to carry

airworthiness document s and other aircraft manuals onboard the aircraft. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2):

(b) No person may operate a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft

–

... (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is required by § 21.5 of this chapter, unless th ere is available in the aircraft a current approved AirplaneU.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 11

or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof.

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 91.203(a) and (b):

(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no pers on may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following:

(1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate...

(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued

under § 91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to

passengers or crew.

Given the small size and configuration of the UAS, it would be impossible to keep

airworthiness documents and ot her aircraft manuals on board the UAS because there is simply no room and the UAS has no cabin or cockpit.

Equivalent Level of Safety

In an FAA Office of Chief Counsel's Opinion dated August 8, 2014, and prepared by Dean E. Griffith, Attorney, AGC

- 220, i t was acknowledged that the intent of 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b) and 91.203(a) and (b) is met if the pilot of the unmanned aircraft has access to the UAS flight manual, registration certificate, and other required documents from the ground control station

from whic h he or she is operating the aircraft. 4 As this FAA Office of Chief Counsel Opinion clarifies, the intent of the rule is to ensure the pilot has access to these key documents during flight. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety will be achieved by ens uring that the pilot has access to the documents at the ground control station from which he or she is piloting the UAS.

E. 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a): Aircraft Marking and Identification Requirements

Vine Rangers seeks an ex emption from the aircraft marking and identification requirements contained in 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a).

4 Memorandum from Mark Bury, FAA Assistant Chief Counsel for International Law, Legislation and Regulation, to John Duncan, FA A Flight Standards Service (Aug. 8, 2014); see also Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352 at 16

- 18.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 201 4 Page 12

● 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(c), Civil Aircraft Flight Manual, Marking and Placard requirements, provides that:

No person may operate a U.S.

- reg istered civil aircraft unless that aircraft is identified in accordance with Part 45 of this chapter.

● 14 C.F.R. § 45.23(b), Markings of the Aircraft, states:

When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on l imited, restricted or light

- sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor mo re than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light

- sport, "experimental," or "provisional," as applicable.

● 14 C.F.R. § 45.27(a), Rotorcraft, states:

Each operator of a rotorcraft must display on that rotorcraft horizontally on

both surfaces o f the cabin, fuselage, boom, or tail the marks required by § 45.23.

In a previous Grant of Exemption, the FAA determined that exemption from these requirements was warranted provided that the aircraft "have identification (N

- Number) markings

in accordance with 14 C.F.R Part 45, Subpart C if the markings are as large as practicable."

FAA Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352.

Equivalent Level of Safety

All UA flown by Vine Rangers will bear N

- number markings that are as large as practicable in accordance with 14 C.F .R. Part 45, Subpart C. 5

5 See, e.g., FAA Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352, at 14.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 13

F. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action

Vine Rangers seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.103, which requires a PIC to become familiar with specific information before each flight, including information contained in

the FAA

- a pproved Flight Manual on board the aircraft. While the PIC will be familiar with all information necessary to safely conduct the flight, an exemption is requested to the extent that an

FAA

- approved Flight Manual is required.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be provided by following the Vine Rangers' Ops Manual and the Manufacturer's Manuals. The PIC will perform a series of checklists designed to identify any defects or inoperable components in accordance with the Vine Rangers ' Ops Manual, including checklists covering Pre

- Flight, Launch, Landing, and Post

- Flight procedures. The PIC will also be required to review weather, flight requirements, battery charge, landing and takeoff distance, UA performance data, and contingency l anding areas

— before initiation of flight. Vine Rangers' Ops Manual and the Manufacturer's Manual (and any other relevant manufacturer publications) will be kept at the GCS and will be accessible to the PIC at all times while operating the UAS.

G. 14 C.F.R . § 91.109(a): Flight Instruction

Vine Rangers seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a), which provides in pertinent part that "[n]o person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless t hat aircraft has fully functioning dual controls." UASs and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design, do not have functional dual controls. Instead, flight control is accomplished through the use of a device that communicates with the aircraft via

radi o communications. Accordingly, an exemption will be required for the flight instruction requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a).

Equivalent Level of Safety

Given the size and speed of the UAS that Vine Rangers intends to use, an equivalent

level of safe t raining can still be performed without dual controls because no pilot or passengers are aboard the UAS, and as required by the Vine Rangers' Ops Manual, all persons will be a safe distance away in the event that the UAS experiences any difficulties during flight instruction. Moreover, as required by the Vine Rangers' Ops Manual, all flight training will be conducted in controlled and sterile environment. As a whole, the safety procedures provided for in Vine Rangers' Ops Manual ensure that the proposed UA S operations provide an equivalent or higher level of safety than that provided by the flight instruction regulations.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 14

H. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes

Vine Rangers requests an exemption from the minimum safe altitude requirements of 1 4 C.F.R. § 91.119. Section 91.119 prescribes the minimum safe altitudes under which aircraft may not operate, including 500 feet above the surface and away from any person, vessel, vehicle, or

structure in non

- congested areas. See 14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c). Section 91.119(d) allows for a helicopter to operate at less than those minimum altitudes when it can be operated "without hazard to persons or property on the surface," provided that "each person operating the helicopter complies with any routes or altit udes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA."

An exemption is required because in order to perform the intended agricultural aerial surveys and inspections, the UAS will need to be operated lower than 400 feet AGL. Further,

due to the nature o f the proposed operations, the PIC and Observer(s) may at times be less than 500 feet away from the UAS.

Equivalent Level of Safety

Compared to flight operations with rotorcraft weighing far more than the maximum weights proposed herein, and given the la ck of flammable fuel with the UASs, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those that presently exist with conventional aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, and speed of the UASs, as well the controlled and sterile location where the operations will occur. In order to avoid any risk to manned aircraft, flight operations will be restricted to 400 feet AGL or below. As set forth in the Ops Manual, the UASs will be operated in a restricted area , and all flights will be operated at a lateral distance of at least 500 feet from any nonparticipating persons, unless that person is in a position where he or she is shielded from the UAS and any possible debris resulting from UAS failure. As required b y the Ops Manual, flights will be terminated if a nonparticipating person within 500 feet of the UAS leaves a shielded position. Further, UAS operations will occur at least 500 feet away from vehicles or structures unless the property

owner/controller has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and, operations near the PIC or Observer will not present an undue hazard per § 91.119(a). As a whole, these requirements ensure a level of safet y better than or equal to the rules from which exemption is sought.

I. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings

Vine Rangers seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.121, which requires a person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude or flight level by reference to an altimeter that is set to the elevation of the departure airport or barometric pressure. An exemption is required to the extent that the UASs do not have a barometric altimeter, but rather a GPS altitude read

out.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 15

Equivalent Lev el of Safety

The FAA has stated that an equivalent level of safety to the requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.121 can be achieved in circumstances where: (1) the UASs will be operated at 400 feet AGL or below, (2) within VLOS, (3) where GPS based altitude info rmation is relayed in real time to the operator at a ground

- based on

- screen display and, (4) where prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is established for the PIC to confirm accuracy of the onboard GPS. See Grant of Exemption to Astraeus Aerial, Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352 at 21.

The UASs that Vine Rangers uses for performing the proposed UAS operations will meet all these operational characteristics. Moreover, as required by Vine Rangers' Ops Manual, the PIC will be required to calibrat e the aircraft's GPS compass prior to each flight operation. Like the Grant of Exemption to Astraeus Aerial, the UASs Vine Rangers intends to use, and the safety mitigation procedures contained in the Ops Manual, both ensure that an equivalent level of sa fety will be achieved, and a grant of exemption to the requirements of § 191.121 is therefore appropriate.

J. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR

Conditions

Vine Rangers requests an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a)'s fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. Section 91.151 states:

(a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended lan ding and, assuming normal cruising speed

–

(1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or

(2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.

Here, the technological limitations on UAS battery power means that no meaningful fligh t operations can be conducted while still maintaining a 30

- minute battery reserve. An exemption from the fuel requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a) is therefore required.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 16

Equivalent Level of Safety

The FAA has stated that an equivalent level of safety ca n be achieved by requiring that each UAS operation be completed within 30 minutes flight time or with 20% battery power remaining, whichever occurs first. See Grant of Exemption to Clayco, Inc., Docket No. FAA

2014

- 0507 at 15. Vine Rangers' Ops Manual co nforms to this limitation, and therefore provides an equivalent level of safety.

The UASs that Vine Rangers will use under this grant of exemption will include low battery warning system. The amount of battery reserve power remaining will be transmitte d to the PIC via telemetric data feed, which downlinks from the UAS to a ground

- based

- on

- screen display. As required by Vine Rangers' Ops Manual, the PIC will promptly fly the UAS back to the home launch location or pre

- determined abort location where the UAS may safely land, while still maintaining a minimum of 20% reserve battery power. Vine Rangers submits that the procedures requiring flights to be safely terminated once the batteries fall below 20% capacity, combined with the requirement that flights only be conducted within a secure, isolated area, using a UAS weighting less than 20 pounds, and within VLOS of the PIC and Observer(s), ensure that the proposed operation will provide an equivalent or higher level of safety to that provided by the regula tions from which exemption is sought.

K. 14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2); 91.417(a) and (b): Maintenance Inspections

Vine Rangers seeks an exemption from the maintenance inspection requirements contained in 14 C.F.R. § 9 1.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) and (b). These regulations specify maintenance and inspection standards in reference to 14 C.F.R. Part 43. See,

e.g., 14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a) (stating that each owner or operator of an aircraft "[s]hall have the aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections ...have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter"). An exemption from these regulations is needed because Part 43 and these sections only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, which the UAS to be operated under this grant of exemption will not

have.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance and inspections will be pe rformed in accordance with the Manufacturer's Manuals and any required manufacturer Safety or Service Bulletins. Further, as required by Vine Rangers' Ops Manual, the PIC will conduct a pre

- flight inspection of the UAS and all associated equipment to acco unt for all discrepancies and/or inoperable components. Maintenance will be performed and verified to address any conditions potentially affecting safe operation of the UAS and no flights will occur unless, and until all flight critical components of the UAS have been found to be airworthy andU.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 17

in a condition safe for operation. A functional test flight will be conducted following the replacement of any flight

- critical components. As required by Vine Rangers' Ops Manual, the

PIC who conducts the functional test flight will make an entry in the UAS aircraft records of the flight.

Vine Rangers' Ops Manual also includes requirements to follow the manufacturer’s UAS aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirement s for the following applicable components: powertrain system (powerplant), propellers, avionics and control surfaces (including ailerons/elevons), structures & airframe, camera system, electrical systems (including batteries), GCS, hazard accessories, and spare parts. Further, Vine Rangers' Ops Manual also includes procedures to document and maintain a record of the UAS maintenance, preventative maintenance, alterations, status of replacement /overhaul component parts, and the total time in service of the UASs used under this grant of exemption. As a whole, the maintenance and inspection procedures required in Vine Rangers' Ops Manual ensure that an equivalent or higher level of safety will be achieved.

L. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges a nd Limitations

Vine rangers seeks exemption from 14 CFR § 61.113 , which restricts private pilot certificate holders from flying aircraft for compensation or hire, and would also require a second class medical certificate. The purpose of Part 61 is to e nsure that the skill and competency of any PIC matches the airspace in which the PIC will be operating, as well as requiring certifications if the private pilot is carrying passengers or cargo for hire. In this case, while the UASs will be operated as par t of a commercial operation, it carries neither passengers nor cargo. In the Grant of Exemption in FAA Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352, the FAA determined that the unique characteristics of UAS operation outside of controlled airspace did not warrant the

additio n cost and restrictions attendant with requiring a the PIC to have a commercial pilot

certificate and class II medical certificate.

The restrictions Vine Rangers has placed on its UAS operations meet or exceed the restrictions similarly imposed on Astra eus Aerial in FAA Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352. Vine Rangers will operate away from persons and property not involved in the operation, and flights will be conducted using VLOS at 400' AGL or below. A NOTAM will be issued between 48

and 72 hours before the f light is to occur, and the flight will be coordinated with the applicable

FSDO.

Equivalent Level of Safety

In addition to these flight restrictions, Vine Rangers will further ensure safe operation by requiring that any PIC be thoroughly versed not only in airspace and communication issues pertaining to all aircraft operators but also in the unique aspects of UAS flight. As set forth in the Operations Manual, Pilots will have experience not only in UAS operations generally butU.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 18

have logged flight ti me in the specific make and model used for the operations before they are permitted to participate in commercial flights on behalf of Vine Rangers . Petitioner believes that this system will provide a higher level of competency and proficiency for its pilo ts.

VI. D RUG AND A LCOHOL P ROGRAM

Vine Rangers will have policies in place to ensure that no person may participate in UAS flight operations if they are under the influence of alcohol or any drug.

VII. P UBLIC I NTEREST

The public interest will be served by granting Vine Rangers' Petition for Exemption. Congress has established a national policy that favors early integration of UAS into the NAS in controlled, safe working environments such as those proposed in this Petition. Granting this

Petition for E xemption helps fulfill Congress' goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the

Reform Act

— the FAA Administrator's assessment of whether certain UAS may operate safely in the NAS before completion of the statutorily required rulemaking.

The proposed UAS operations in this Petition for Exemption significantly improve safety and reduce risk by alleviating the public's exposure to danger and emissions associated with traditional agricultural aerial survey and inspection methods, namely, full size fixed

- w ing aircraft and rotorcraft. The UASs Petitioner intends to use are battery powered and create no emissions. Moreover, in the unlikely event that one of Petitioner's UASs crash, there is no fuel to ignite and explode. Any accident involving Petitioner's lightweight UASs will present significantly less danger to the pilot and other individuals on the ground than one involving a full size helicopter.

Moreover, the agricultural modeling and imaging resulting from Vine Rangers' UASs will provide farmers and growers with the information they need to produce more from their land while also conserving valuable resources like water and energy. The ability to pinpoint and precision spray pesticides reduce s human exposure to pesticides and also mitigates negat ive side

effects on the ecology of the farm/vineyard associated with overuse of pesticides. The public as a whole will benefit from an agricultural industry that can harness the power of new technologies to produce better crops in a cost

- effective, sustai nable and environmentally conscious manner.

VIII. P RIVACY

All Vine Ranger UAS operations will be conducted in accordance with applicable federal, state, or local laws regarding privacy. Vine Rangers will not conduct flight operations over property tha t it does not own or control without the prior consent and knowledge of the

property owner.U.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 19

IX. F EDERAL R EGISTER S UMMARY

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the

F EDERAL R EGISTER , should it be determine d that publication is needed:

Petitioner seeks an exemption from the following rules in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations:

Part 21, Subpart H; Part 27; 45.23(b); 45.27(a); 61.113; 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.9(c); 91.103; 91.109(a); 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203 (a) & (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(1) & (2); 91.417 (a) & (b).

The exemption will enhance safety by reducing risk to the general public and property owners from the substantial hazards associated with performing equiv alent agricultural aerial surveys and inspections with conventional fixed

- wing aircraft, rotorcraft, or other methods.

X. C ONCLUSION

Vine Rangers' Petition for Exemption satisfies the criteria articulated in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012 including weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas, operation within VLOS and national security. The proposed UAS operations will benefit the public as a whole by improving safety and reducing risk by alleviating human

expos ure to danger. The public also benefits from improving the quality, environmental friendliness, and cost

- effectiveness of comparable agricultural surveys and inspections completed with conventional flight operations. In consideration of the foregoing, th is Petition for Exemption provides the FAA with more than adequate justification for granting the requested exemptions allowing Vine Rangers to perform precision agricultural surveys and inspections using small UAS.

We thank you for your prompt conside ration of our requested exemptions. Should you have any questions, or if you need any additional information to support the requested exemptions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Matthew J. Clark

Matthew J. Clark

Lisa M. Ellman

Mark E. McKinnon Counsel for Vine RangersU.S. Department of Transportation

January 13, 2014 Page 20

(The following attached items contain proprietary and commercial information exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U .S.C. § 522 et seq. , and should be held in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b)).

Attachment A : Vine Rangers' UAS Operations Manual

DC 51195545.1