alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Robert A. Berman, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of ITUS Corporation, hereby certifies that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |                                                  
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 29, 2015 | /s/ Robert A. Berman                             
|                       | Robert A. Berman                                 
|                       | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
On August 31, 2011, OCR reached agreement with the  George Washington University regarding the University’s handling of allegations  and reports of sexual assault and harassment on campus. The University agreed  to revise its policies, procedures and investigative practices to provide a  grievance procedure that ensures prompt and equitable resolution of sexual  harassment and sexual assault allegations; develop on-going training programs  for employees and students regarding Title IX, the University’s obligations  under Title IX, the University’s procedures for addressing sexual violence,  resources available to students who believe they have been sexually assaulted,  and information about OCR and its authority to enforce Title IX; establish a  diverse student committee to identify and recommend strategies to assist  students to understand their rights under Title IX, how to report a Title IX  violation, and the University’s obligations under Title IX; and conduct annual  climate checks with University students to assess the effectiveness of the  University’s actions to fulfill its obligations under Title IX. The agreement  also provided individual relief to the student who filed the complaint.
#### Philip Adams et al., Respondents, v National Car Rental Systems, Inc., et al., Appellants.

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See *Finn v Crystal Beach Tr. Co.,*55 AD2d 1001; *Barner v Shook,*51 AD2d 855.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — amended complaint.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Doerr, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: National Guidelines for Child and Youth Behavioral Health Crisis Care      

# Resource: National Guidelines for Child and Youth Behavioral Health Crisis Care

This report offers best practices, implementation strategies, and practical guidance for the design and development of services that meet the needs of American children and their families experiencing a behavioral health crisis.**Learn more.**
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION No s . 04 - 13 - 00222 - CR , 04 - 13 - 000223 - CR, 04 - 13 - 000224 - CR & 04 - 13 - 000225 - CR Francisco R. HERNANDEZ , Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No s . 2010CR0819 , 2011CR2469, 2012CR2586 & 2012CR3718A Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 22, 2013 DISMISSED The trial court’s certification in each of these appeals s tates that “this criminal case is a plea - bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record filed in each of these appeals contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by t he prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certifications accurately reflect that the underlying cases are plea - bargain cases. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 25.2(a)(2).04 - 13 - 00222 - CR, 04 - 13 - 00223 - CR, 04 - 13 - 00224 - CR & 04 - 13 - 00225 - CR

- 2 - Appellant’s counsel has filed written notice with this court that counsel has reviewed the record in each of these appeals and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication that appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that he has the righ t of appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the records presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Research on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)      

# Research on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

**Grants.gov Deadline:** February 12, 2024, 11:59 pm ET **JustGrants Deadline:** February 26, 2024, 8:59 pm ET

With this solicitation (PDF, 33 pages), NIJ seeks proposals from accredited research universities to study law enforcement’s responses to opioid overdoses. Proposed studies should consider law enforcement’s responses with linked community agencies and include specific practices utilized to ensure the well-being, assessment, and protection of children in these situations. **Learn more and apply.**
#### 425.105 Determining reasonableness of cost.

The SPE may make the determination prescribed in FAR 25.105(a). Requests for a determination by the SPE shall be submitted by the HCA, in writing, and shall provide a detailed justification supporting why evaluation factors higher than those listed in FAR 25.102(b)(1) and (2) should be applied to determine whether the offered price of a domestic end product is unreasonable.
Exhibit 32.1

I, Steven V. Lant, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the "Companies"), do hereby
certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companies for the period ending
      March 31, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Companies.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CH Energy Group, Inc. and to Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation and will be retained by CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson Gas
& Electric Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

                                    CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.
                                        (Registrant)

                   By:                /s/ Steven V. Lant
                      --------------------------------------------------
                                       Steven V. Lant
                            Chairman of the Board, President and
                                   Chief Executive Officer


                          CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION
                                       (Co-Registrant)

                   By:                /s/ Steven V. Lant
                      --------------------------------------------------
                                       Steven V. Lant
                      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 7, 2004


                                       45
6104.401 Scope [Rule 401]. ( a ) *Authority.* These procedures govern the Board's resolution of claims by Federal civilian employees for certain travel or relocation expenses. 31 U.S.C. 3702 vests the authority to settle these claims in the Administrator of General Services, who has redelegated that function to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. The requirements contained in 31 U.S.C. 3702, including limitations on the time within which claims may be filed, apply to the Board's review of these claims.
( b ) *Types of claims.* These procedures are applicable to the review of two types of claims made against the United States by federal civilian employees: ( 1 ) Claims for reimbursement of expenses incurred while on official temporary duty travel; and
( 2 ) Claims for reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with relocation to a new duty station.
( c ) *Review of claims.* Any claim for entitlement to travel or relocation expenses must first be filed with the claimant's own department or agency (the agency). The agency shall initially adjudicate the claim. A claimant disagreeing with the agency's determination may request review of the claim by the Board. The burden is on the claimant to establish the timeliness of the claim, the liability of the agency, and the claimant's right to payment. The Board will issue the final decision on a claim based on the information submitted by the claimant and the agency.
AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL 

RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 

Rule 1011. Responsive Pleading or Motion in 

Involuntary and Ancillary Cases 

(a) WHO MAY CONTEST PETITION. The debtor named 

in an involuntary petition or a party in interest to a 

petition commencing a case ancillary to a foreign 

proceeding may contest the petition. In the case of a 

petition against a partnership under Rule 1004, a 

nonpetitioning general partner, or a person who is alleged 

to be a general partner but denies the allegation, may 

contest the petition. 

* * * * * 

Rule 2002. Notices to Creditors, Equity Security 

Holders, United States, and United States Trustee 

* * * * * 

(j) NOTICES TO THE UNITED STATES. Copies of 

notices required to be mailed to all creditors under this 
2 FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 

rule shall be mailed (1) in a chapter 11 reorganization 

case, to the Securities and Exchange Commission at any 

place the Commission designates, if the Commission has 

filed either a notice of appearance in the case or a written 

request to receive notices; (2) in a commodity broker case, 

to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission at 

Washington, D.C.; (3) in a chapter 11 case, to the Internal 

Revenue Service at its address set out in the register 

maintained under Rule 5003(e) for the district in which 

the case is pending; (4) if the papers in the case disclose a 

debt to the United States other than for taxes, to the 

United States attorney for the district in which the case is 

pending and to the department, agency, or 

instrumentality of the United States through which the 

debtor became indebted; or (5) if the filed papers disclose 
FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 3 

a stock interest of the United States, to the Secretary of 

the Treasury at Washington, D.C. 

* * * * * 

Rule 9014. Contested Matters 

* * * * * 

(c) APPLICATION OF PART VII RULES. Except as 

otherwise provided in this rule, and unless the court 

directs otherwise, the following rules shall apply: 7009, 

7017, 7021, 7025, 7026, 7028-7037, 7041, 7042, 7052, 

7054-7056, 7064, 7069, and 7071. The following 

subdivisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, as incorporated by Rule 

7026, shall not apply in a contested matter unless the 

court directs otherwise: 26(a)(1) (mandatory disclosure), 

26(a)(2) (disclosures regarding expert testimony) and 

26(a)(3) (additional pre-trial disclosure), and 26(f) 

(mandatory meeting before scheduling 
4 FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 

conference/discovery plan). An entity that desires to 

perpetuate testimony may proceed in the same manner as 

provided in Rule 7027 for the taking of a deposition before 

an adversary proceeding. The court may at any stage in a 

particular matter direct that one or more of the other 

rules in Part VII shall apply. The court shall give the 

parties notice of any order issued under this paragraph to 

afford them a reasonable opportunity to comply with the 

procedures prescribed by the order. 

* * * * *
Friday, 09 September 2011 

Dear Distribution Transformers Stakeholders, 

Mr. Wes Patterson of ABB recently expressed some confusion about DOE’s terminology for various levels of 

efficiency that it uses to set standards. My sense is that his confusion may be shared by some others in the 

negotiating committee, and I wanted to take a moment to clarify the matter. 

In a typical rulemaking, DOE issues two sets of results before the final rule. The first is called the preliminary 

analysis and has multiple efficiency points selected for each design line. These are called “Candidate Standard 

Levels,” or “CSLs.”

The second set of results comes with the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, or NOPR. For the NOPR, DOE updates its 

analysis and relabels the CSLs to be “Efficiency Levels,” or “ELs.” Some of the ELs may move relative to their 

corresponding CSLs based on updates to the analysis, while others may not. But their function is identical and the 

difference is largely one of terminology. 

DOE also does something else in the NOPR. It packages together different groups of ELs for each design line into 

what it calls “Trial Standard Levels,” or “TSLs.” The TSLs usually have some kind of economic or technical 

significance. For example, one TSL could be formed from choosing the EL in every design line that produced the 

maximum life-cycle cost savings. It is possible that a particular EL in a particular equipment class could be packaged 

into more than one TSL. When DOE choose between different standard levels, it is choosing amongst its TSLs. That 

is the normal course of action. 

The current negotiations are taking place at an interesting time, as far as terminology is concerned. DOE has 

already issued its preliminary analysis, but has not yet issued a NOPR. It is misleading (as Wes Patterson pointed 

out) to continue saying “CSL” when DOE has already published CSLs different from the current ones. At the same 

time, calling the current levels “ELs” would raise the same question when the NOPR eventually arrives. A similar 

argument applies with TSLs. 

To eliminate the ambiguity, the current analysis will use the word “draft” before the usual NOPR terms to indicate 

that these may be different from what is eventually published in the NOPR. ELs and TSLs will instead be dELs and 

dTSLs. The analysis has been updated and reposted on the Rulemaking Website1

. We thank Wes for raising the 

issue, and hope that this removes the ambiguity. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Coffey 

On behalf of the Department of Energy 

 

1

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/distribution_transformers.html
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARRICK W. BAILEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 198 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Webinar Recording: Public Health and STEM with the CDC      

# Webinar Recording: Public Health and STEM with the CDC

In this webinar recording, CDC staff discuss STEM-related resources for students, teachers, and early career professionals. CDC’s goal is to help educators bring public health to the classroom to foster educational excellence and inspire the next generation of STEM learners to pursue public health careers. **Learn more.**
1

Werner, Christopher

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:40 PM

To: Werner, Christopher; Lorang, Phil

Subject: Summary of Additional Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM 

-- Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-

AS55)

Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866_13563_RHR NPRM_03242016.docx

Categories: Regional Haze

Attached please find the summary of additional interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the draft 

proposed rule entitled, Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55). The 

summary of interagency comments are based on the most recent version submitted by EPA for interagency review

Aaron L. Szabo 

Policy Analyst 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

Office of Management and Budget 

202-395-3621 

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov