alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 28 (Friday, February 12, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 9261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02911]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Parts 217, 225, 238, and 252

RIN 7100-AF95


Amendments to Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements 
for Large Bank Holding Companies, Intermediate Holding Companies and 
Savings and Loan Holding Companies

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board).

ACTION: Technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in amendatory instruction 2 
affecting Part 217 of the Board's Regulation Q published in the Federal 
Register on February 3, 2021.

DATES: Effective April 5, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Asad Kudiya, Senior Counsel, (202) 
475-6358 or Jonah Kind, Counsel, (202) 452-2045. You may also contact 
any of the named individuals in the final rule document 86 FR 7927 
(February 3, 2021).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In final rule FR Doc. 2021-02182, published on February 3, 2021, on 
page 7938, in the third column, make the following corrections to 
instruction 2, amending Sec.  217.11:


Sec.  217.11  [Corrected]

0
1. In instruction 2.b., the text ``Revising the paragraph (c) subject 
heading and paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii), (c)(1)(iii) introductory 
text, and (c)(1)(iv) introductory text, (c)(1)(v) introductory text, 
and (c)(vi) introductory text; and'' is corrected to read ``Revising 
the paragraph (c) heading and paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii), 
(c)(1)(iii) introductory text, (c)(1)(iv) introductory text, (c)(1)(v) 
introductory text, and (c)(1)(vi); and''
0
2. In instruction 2.c., the text ``Correctly designating the second 
occurrence of paragraph (c)(1)(v) as paragraph (c)(1)(vii); and'' is 
corrected to read ``Correctly designating the second occurrence of 
paragraph (c)(1)(v) as paragraph (c)(1)(vii) and revising it; and''
0
3. In instruction 2.d., the text ``Revising paragraph (c)(2).'' is 
corrected to read ``Revising paragraph (c)(2) heading, (c)(2)(i) and 
(c)(2)(ii) introductory text''.

Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-02911 Filed 2-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements—Secondary Site of the Work.

As prescribed in 22.407(h), insert the following provision:

# Construction Wage Rate Requirements—Secondary Site of the Work (MAY 2014)

(a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Construction Wage Rate Requirements, of this solicitation.

(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.

(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.

(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.

(End of provision)

[70 FR 33667, June 8, 2005, as amended at 79 FR 24217, Apr. 29, 2014]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6272
RONALD L. WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-1439-2-22AJ) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. South Carolina , No. CA-95-1439-2-22AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: 2022 National Mathematics and Reading Report Cards at Grades 4 and 8      

# Resource: 2022 National Mathematics and Reading Report Cards at Grades 4 and 8

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) released National Assessment of Educational Progress, also known as The Nation’s Report Card, which is the largest nationally representative and continuing assessment of what students in public and private schools in the United States know and can do in various subjects. The data reveal that mathematics and reading scores of fourth and eighth graders declined in 51 participating states and jurisdictions during the pandemic. **Learn more.**
# CI2020070EN.01000201.xml

| 4.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 70/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 70/2

---

Corrigendum to Recruitment notice PE/235/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Communication – Directorate for Resources

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 65 A of 28 February 2020
  )

(2020/C 70 I/02)

| 1. | On the cover page, second title: |
| --- | --- |

1.

for:

‘Recruitment notice PE/235/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Communication – Directorate for Resources’,

read:

‘Recruitment notice PE/234/S – Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union – Directorate for Democracy Support’.

| 2. | On page 7, title: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 7, title:

for:

‘RECRUITMENT NOTICE PE/235/S

Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14)

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR COMMUNICATION – DIRECTORATE FOR RESOURCES’,

read:

‘RECRUITMENT NOTICE PE/234/S

Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14)

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION – DIRECTORATE FOR DEMOCRACY SUPPORT’.

---
#### 52.203-6 Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government.

As prescribed in 3.503-2, insert the following clause:

# Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (JUN 2020)

(a) Except as provided in (b) below, the Contractor shall not enter into any agreement with an actual or prospective subcontractor, nor otherwise act in any manner, which has or may have the effect of restricting sales by such subcontractors directly to the Government of any item or process (including computer software) made or furnished by the subcontractor under this contract or under any follow-on production contract.

(b) The prohibition in (a) above does not preclude the Contractor from asserting rights that are otherwise authorized by law or regulation.

(c) The Contractor agrees to incorporate the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts under this contract which exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, as defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation 2.101 on the date of subcontract award.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (NOV 2021). As prescribed in 3.503-2, substitute the following paragraph in place of paragraph (b) of the basic clause:

(b) The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this clause does not preclude the Contractor from asserting rights that are otherwise authorized by law or regulation. For acquisitions of commercial products or commercial services, the prohibition in paragraph (a) applies only to the extent that any agreement restricting sales by subcontractors results in the Federal Government being treated differently from any other prospective purchaser for the sale of the commercial product(s) and commercial service(s).

[50 FR 35479, Aug. 30, 1985, as amended at 60 FR 34761, July 3, 1995; 60 FR 48251, Sept. 18, 1995; 61 FR 39198, July 26, 1996; 71 FR 57369, Sept. 28, 2006; 85 FR 27091, May 6, 2020; 86 FR 61031, Nov. 4, 2021]
#### 52.242-17 Government Delay of Work.

As prescribed in 42.1305(c), insert the following clause:

# Government Delay of Work (APR 1984)

(a) If the performance of all or any part of the work of this contract is delayed or interrupted (1) by an act of the Contracting Officer in the administration of this contract that is not expressly or impliedly authorized by this contract, or (2) by a failure of the Contracting Officer to act within the time specified in this contract, or within a reasonable time if not specified, an adjustment (excluding profit) shall be made for any increase in the cost of performance of this contract caused by the delay or interruption and the contract shall be modified in writing accordingly. Adjustment shall also be made in the delivery or performance dates and any other contractual term or condition affected by the delay or interruption. However, no adjustment shall be made under this clause for any delay or interruption to the extent that performance would have been delayed or interrupted by any other cause, including the fault or negligence of the Contractor, or for which an adjustment is provided or excluded under any other term or condition of this contract.

(b) A claim under this clause shall not be allowed (1) for any costs incurred more than 20 days before the Contractor shall have notified the Contracting Officer in writing of the act or failure to act involved, and (2) unless the claim, in an amount stated, is asserted in writing as soon as practicable after the termination of the delay or interruption, but not later than the day of final payment under the contract.

(End of clause)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 48251, 48256, Sept. 18, 1995; 72 FR 27389, May 15, 2007; 86 FR 61037, Nov. 4, 2021]
COURT OF APPEALS

Thirteenth District

Corpus Christi – Edinburg, Texas

Below is the JUDGMENT in the numbered cause set out herein to be Filed and 

Entered in the Minutes of the Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District of Texas, at Corpus 

Christi – Edinburg, as of the 26th day of September, 2013. If this Judgment does not 

conform to the opinion handed down by the Court in this cause, any party may file a 

Motion for Correction of Judgment with the Clerk of this Court.

CAUSE NO. 13-13-00255-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 2011-DCL-2579)

CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

FRANCISCO SALINAS AND 

GREGORIA SALINAS, 

INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES 

OF THE ESTATE OF LUPITA 

ESTELLA SALINAS (DECEDENT), Appellees. 

On appeal to this Court from Cameron County, Texas.

 

JUDGMENT

On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, from an order

signed April 23, 2013. Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam.

THIS CAUSE was submitted, to the Court on September 26, 2013, on the clerk’s 

record, briefs and the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The Court, having 

examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the motion 

should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED.

Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellants, CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS. It 

is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.



DORIAN E. RAMIREZ, CLERK
Dear Educators:

The White House Commission on the National Moment of Remembrance            was established by Congress to put the "memorial" back in            Memorial Day. Unfortunately, too many Americans have lost sight of the            meaning of the holiday. In fact, the idea of the Moment was born in            1996 when children touring our Nation's capital were asked what Memorial            Day means and responded, "That's the day the pools open."

As a member of the Commission, I am writing to ask for your support            to reclaim this noble holiday for its intended purpose of honoring those            who died in service to our great country. On Memorial Day, May 27, a            National Moment of Remembrance will be observed by Americans            everywhere at 3:00 p.m. local time. The theme is "One Nation, One            Moment." We need your help to gain the broadest possible awareness            and participation among young people.

Please let teachers and students know about the opportunity to participate            in a new American tradition simply by pausing wherever they may be at            3:00 p.m. for one minute to reflect on our fallen heroes. They can encourage            their families and friends to join them. The activities they are enjoying            on the holiday reflect the freedoms guaranteed by the sacrifices of            the men and women who gave their lives. If they are driving at 3:00            p.m., they can simply turn on their vehicle's headlights.

For schools that are still in session after the holiday, teachers can            ask students to recount how they observed the Moment. This may            be appropriate to integrate into end-of-year classes and activities.

A variety of tools, including the Remembrance poster, are available            to download at the official website, www.remember.gov.            Click the "Download Media" menu on the left side of the main            page, and the poster is at the top of the page under Artwork - it's            the third file, National Moment of Remembrance Poster Art. You and your            students are encouraged to download and distribute the items as needed.

I hope that all educators and students will join with the President            and me in encouraging all Americans to honor the men and women who died            in service to our Nation and left us a legacy of service, a heritage            of sacrifice, and the gift of freedom. Let us never forget.

Thank you for your support and participation.

Sincerely,

/s/

Rod Paige

|Last Modified: 09/15/2004
|-------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6512
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRED JACOBS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-91-57-BO, CA-96-28-7-BO) Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his motion brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We affirm. Appellant pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine inviolation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994). He now claims that the prosecutor entered false evidence regarding previous crimes, resulting in his being improperly sentenced as a career offender under United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual , § 4B1.1 (1992). Notwithstanding the possibility that Appellant has waived his rightto attack his sentence, we find that his claim is meritless. According to the information contained in Appellant's pre-sentence report, Appellant was over the age of eighteen when he committed the instant drug offense and he had two prior offenses fitting thecategories prescribed by § 4B1.1 as defined by § 4B1.2. Accordingly, we find that he was properly sentenced as a career offender and that the prosecution presented no false evidence of his prior offenses. We therefore affirm the district court's dismissal of his motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

                              COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                            (Chief Executive Officer)

In connection with the Annual Report of Community Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Eddie  L.
Dunklebarger,  Chief Executive Officer,  Chairman, and President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community  Banks,  Inc.,  and will be retained by  Community  Banks,
Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/  Eddie L. Dunklebarger
------------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and President
March 12, 2004
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for OhioReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for OhioReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for OhioReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479580281.unknown

# _1479580282.unknown

# _1479580280.unknown
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew Walker, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Preston Smith, Appellant.

Motions by two eodefendants, *pro se:*(a) to have this court hold in abeyance their pending appeals from judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 20, 1964 after a joint jury trial, convicting each of them of rape in the first degree and other crimes, and imposing sentence; and (h) to remit the action to the trial court for a separate trial *de novo*upon the issue of the voluntariness of defendants’ confessions. These motions are made necessary because of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States *(Jackson*v. *Denno,*378 U. S. 368). It appears that the issue as to the voluntariness of defendants’ confessions Was raised at the trial and submitted to the jury. Accordingly, the motions are granted and the action is remitted to the Criminal Term, County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. A separate trial should be accorded promptly to the defendants upon the issue of the voluntariness of their confessions. Such trial should be held *de novo*before the court alone, without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the Justice presiding shall render promptly his decision setting forth specifically his findings upon the issue. The decision should be based exclusively on the evidence adduced upon such trial. The trial should also he conducted in accordance with such further or different procedures and requirements as may be prescribed by the Court of Appeals of this' State in any decision rendered by it prior to the trial court’s decision upon the issue of voluntariness. Within 20 days after the trial court’s decision upon the issue of voluntariness, *928a supplemental record, consisting of the typewritten or printed transcript of the stenographic minutes of the separate trial and of the count’s decision and findings, should be filed and served by the District Attorney. Within 30 days *thereafter,*each defendant shall serve and file his typewritten *or*printed brief or supplemental brief; and within 20 days thereafter the District Attorney shall serve and file his brief or supplemental brief. [If defendants’ brief or supplemental brief be typewritten, six copies are required to be filed and one copy served.] The appeals are directed to be placed on the calendar for the April Term, commencing March 29, 1965. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.