alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12559

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

RICHARD HARRIS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES COTTE, 

JOHN DOE, 

GILBERT NOE, 

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

USCA11 Case: 23-12559 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-12559

D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cv-00646-SPC-NPM

____________________

Before BRANCH,GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Richard Harris appeals from a magistrate judge’s July 25, 2023 

order denying his motions for appointment of counsel. However, 

we lack jurisdiction to directly review magistrate judge orders, as 

an appeal from such an order must be taken to the district court 

before the appellant files his notice of appeal. See United States 

v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009). Furthermore, the 

district court’s August 15, 2023 order refusing to vacate the July 25 

magistrate judge order does not cure the premature notice of appeal because the August 15 order was entered after Harris’s August 

2 notice of appeal. See Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 

F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998). 

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for 

rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other 

requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules. 

USCA11 Case: 23-12559 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 2 of 2
BULLETIN 1016 PLATE 21

R13 E R.14E,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Ania
E

EXPLANATION

Ooo
© OKMULGEE

) 5
‘Shaft mine entry

Pel

Qal

‘Alluvium
Sand, silt, and clay in flood plains

OUGC

2
Slope mine entry

Drift mine entry

QUATERNARY

Qt

Terrace deposits
‘Sand, silt, and clay above flood plains

2
Quarry

ORS

(605
100000

Calvin sandstone

(===

PENNSYLVANIAN

‘Senora formation

Sandstone, shale, coal, and a few beds of limestone.

Fins pape eee pel alpen El ers a
ignate shale. Symbols Psla-Ps7 are’ thove used in

tr

desig
tgraphic diagram: tope of ean marked
sratigraphte diagram: tope of eandstone beds

Area from which coal
has been stripped
———
oe aee
ee

or of coaly zone
Dashed where approzimately located,
dotted where concealed

Upper contact of sandstone beds are dashed, os are
al other contacts where appresinately fasted

Dashed where approximately located; v, 1
Wise vs Gotown tiie weriat ohare toe

Fe
z

SSS 2
Anticline

Showing azial plone; dashed where 0
rat tls es hereon gard whore

ee

_ Syncing :

Sr ied ited her concealed queried where mK
2

Strike and dip of beds s

‘Shown only where measuremente indicate bede depart
Srom gentle westward dip ail

RIZE )
: at

Junction x
\

Qal A
1 ets

-
sb MORRIS
COAL BED

Pela

Qt

30

HENRYETT/
COAL BED,

Pela

31

Pel

11 _

|) Qal

Qal

ed

Base compiled from aerial photographs
‘and township plats

ty

Ss
“=

HENRYETTACS
COAL BED

m7

18

WILDCAT

[ala]

Sy

2

aa

fa}
poooooG)
Ir

Qal

Bpe
i ‘
28 ox » 26 25,
ay Ff ca oN,
Qt
2

\
\HOFFMA;
oy ae a)

29

Pel
31

OKMULGEE CO

ro

Qal |
Geology by R. J. Dunham and
J.V.A. Trumbull, 1951

GEOLOGIC MAP AND CROSS SECTIONS OF THE HENRYETTA MINING DISTRICT, OKRMULGEE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

1
t

Scale 1:48,000
2 Miles

Lo

9!

TRUE NORTH
MAGN
ETIC NORTE
#### 570.105-1 Contracting by negotiation.

Contracting by negotiation is appropriate for acquiring space in a building through a lease contract. The contracting officer will usually need to conduct discussions with offerors about their proposals and consider factors other than price in making the award.

[76 FR 30849, May 27, 2011]
#### 247.372 DD Form 1654, Evaluation of Transportation Cost Factors.

Contracting personnel may use the DD Form 1654 to furnish information to the transportation office for development of cost factors for use by the contracting officer in the evaluation of f.o.b. origin offers.

[56 FR 36466, July 31, 1991. Redesignated at 75 FR 51418, Aug. 20, 2010]
#### 52.246-1 Contractor Inspection Requirements.

As prescribed in 46.301, insert the following clause:

# Contractor Inspection Requirements (APR 1984)

The Contractor is responsible for performing or having performed all inspections and tests necessary to substantiate that the supplies or services furnished under this contract conform to contract requirements, including any applicable technical requirements for specified manufacturers' parts. This clause takes precedence over any Government inspection and testing required in the contract's specifications, except for specialized inspections or tests specified to be performed solely by the Government.

(End of clause)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34762, July 3, 1995]
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Nava Industries, Doing Business as Riteway Trunk &amp; Auto, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Richard Runge, Doing Business as Runge Design, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Certilman, Balin, Adler &amp; Hyman, LLP (Anthony W. Cummings of counsel), for appellant.Meyers Saxon &amp; Cole, Esqs. (Richard H. Byrnes of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Robert E. Pipia, J.), dated September 12, 2018. The order denied defendant's motion to, among other things, open his default in appearing on an adjourned court date.</p><p>ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.</p><p>In this breach of contract action, defendant failed to appear on an adjourned court date. The District Court marked the case file "liability for plaintiff" and, in effect, scheduled an inquest on damages (<i>see</i> Uniform Rules for Dist Cts [22 NYCRR] ยง 212.14 [b] [1]). Defendant appeals from an order of the District Court dated September 12, 2018 denying his motion to, among other things, open his default.</p><p>The appeal must be dismissed, as the right of direct appeal from the order terminated with the entry of a judgment in December 2018 after the inquest (<i>see Matter of Aho</i>, 39 NY2d 241 [1976]).</p><p>Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.</p><p>ADAMS, P.J., TOLBERT and GARGUILO, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: January 30, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
# C_2018370EN.01000301.xml

| 12.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 October 2018

(2018/C 370/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1575 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4603 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87490 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4120 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1430 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 134,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5063 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,848 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,97 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3167 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6673 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,9401 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6314 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5102 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0723 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7852 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5969 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 320,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8958 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9982 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4170 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 634,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8140 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,540 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,9207 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,914 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3270 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1014 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,7615 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1575

JPY

Japanese yen

130,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4603

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87490

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4120

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1430

ISK

Iceland króna

134,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5063

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,848

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,97

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3167

RON

Romanian leu

4,6673

TRY

Turkish lira

6,9401

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6314

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5102

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0723

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7852

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5969

KRW

South Korean won

1 320,70

ZAR

South African rand

16,8958

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9982

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4170

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 634,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8140

PHP

Philippine peso

62,540

RUB

Russian rouble

76,9207

THB

Thai baht

37,914

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3270

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1014

INR

Indian rupee

85,7615

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1123

In re: STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:03-cv-00299-NCT)

Submitted: May 30, 2008 Decided: July 23, 2008

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus

seeking an order compelling the chief judge of the United States

District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina to act on

his objections to the magistrate judge’s October 31, 2007, order

rejecting post-judgment motions in Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) proceeding. We conclude that Williams is not entitled to

mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has

a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a

drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary

circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,

402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

The record reveals that the chief judge is not assigned

to Williams’ case and that the assigned judge has already ruled on

Williams’ objections to the magistrate judge’s October 31, 2007,

order. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Williams’

motions for expansion of the record and for a permanent stay of

execution of his state court sentences and to expedite

consideration of the motion for stay are denied. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
- 3 -

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Mjalli Haddad

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02472

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

Peter Masheimer, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, April 17, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Pursuant to Joint Agreed

Stipulation to Dismiss [47], this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear

his, her or its own costs and attorneys' fees. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
#### 52.237-5 Payment by Contractor to Government.

As prescribed in 37.304(b), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements whenever the contractor is to receive title to dismantled or demolished property and a net amount of compensation is due to the Government, except if the contracting officer determines that it would be advantageous to the Government for the contractor to pay in increments and the Government to transfer title to the contractor for increments of property only upon receipt of those payments:

# Payment by Contractor to Government (APR 1984)

(a) The Contractor shall receive title to all property to be dismantled, demolished, or removed under this contract and not specifically designated in the Schedule as being retained by the Government. The title shall vest in the Contractor immediately upon the Government's issuing the notice of award, or if a performance bond is to be furnished, upon the Government's issuing a notice to proceed with the work. The Government shall not be responsible for the condition of, or any loss or damage to, the property.

(b) The Contractor shall promptly remove from the site all property acquired by the Contractor. The Government shall not permit storage of property on the site beyond the completion date. If the Contractor does not wish to remove from the site any of the property acquired, the Contracting Officer may, upon written request, grant the Contractor permission to leave the property on the premises. As a condition of the granting of the permission, the Contractor agrees to waive any right, title, claim, or interest in and to the property.

(c) The Contractor shall perform the work called for under this contract and within __ days of receipt of notice of award, unless otherwise provided in the Schedule and before proceeding with the work, shall pay ____ [*fill in amount*]. Checks shall be made payable to the office designated in the contract and shall be forwarded to the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)
#### 52.236-20 [Reserved]
#### (A) Charles G. Bartholomew, Respondent, v. Burton Sacks et al., Appellants. (B) Nicholas E. Colella, Doing Business as Colella Auto Sales, Respondent, v. John J. Sak, Appellant. (C) Harold Crowell et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Appellant. (D) Orrin Grant, an Infant, Appellant, v. Helen L. Davies, Respondent. Richard Grant, Appellant, v. Helen L. Davies, Respondent. (E) Franklin E. Hill, Appellant, v. Carley Styers, Respondent. (F) Neely McDonald, Appellant, v. Annabelle Mitchell, Respondent. (G) Merton Melvin, Appellant, v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., Respondent. (H) In the Matter of Francis J. O’Connor, Petitioner, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent. (I) Harry S. Rohloff et al., Respondents, v. Stanley Lombardo et al., Appellants. (J) The People of the State of New York v. Mary E. Ashley. (K) The People of the State of New York v. Lynn Carter, Also Known as Janie Dickson. (L) The People of the State of New York v. Isaac Harris. (M) The People of the State of New York v. David Cyril Read. (N) The People of the State of New York v. Gerald J. Wagner. (O) The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Frank H. Webster, Respondent.

[In each action] Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
#### 52.247-58 Loading, Blocking, and Bracing of Freight Car Shipments.

As prescribed in 47.305-15(a)(2), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when supplies may be shipped in carload lots by rail:

# Loading, Blocking, and Bracing of Freight Car Shipments (APR 1984)

(a) Upon receipt of shipping instructions, as provided in this contract, the supplies to be included in any carload shipment by rail shall be loaded, blocked, and braced by the Contractor in accordance with the standards published by the Association of American Railroads and effective at the time of shipment.

(b) Shipments, for which the Association of American Railroads has published no such standards, shall be loaded, blocked, and braced in accordance with standards established by the shipper as evidenced by written acceptance of an authorized representative of the carrier.

(c) The Contractor shall be liable for payment of any damage to any supplies caused by the failure to load, block, and brace in accordance with acceptable standards set forth herein.

(d) A copy of the appropriate pamphlet of the Association of American Railroads may be obtained from that Association.

(End of clause)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Jaya Raman, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop S107-8, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone (770) 488-6511,                         *JRaman@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2021-03236 Filed 2-17-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

# Panel Review by Applicant

## Massachusetts

Bottom of Form

# _1479585580.unknown
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 522 

Designating the week of September 23 through September 29, 2018 as 

‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2018 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of September 23 through September 

29, 2018 as ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

Whereas the last Sunday in September— 

(1) is designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s Day’’ 

under section 111 of title 36, United States Code; and 

(2) was first designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s 

Day’’ under the Joint Resolution entitled ‘‘Joint Resolution designating the last Sunday in September as ‘Gold 

Star Mother’s Day’, and for other purposes’’, approved 

June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895); 

Whereas there is no date dedicated to families affected by the 

loss of a loved one who died in service to the United 

States; 

Whereas a gold star symbolizes a family member who died in 

the line of duty while serving in the Armed Forces; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 522 IS 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces, 

through their service, bear the burden of protecting the 

freedom of the people of the United States; 

Whereas the selfless example of the service of the members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces, as well as the sacrifices made by the families of those individuals, inspires 

all individuals in the United States to sacrifice and work 

diligently for the good of United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

of the Armed Forces and the families of veterans of the 

Armed Forces should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of September 23 

3 through September 29, 2018, as ‘‘Gold Star Fami4 lies Remembrance Week’’; 

5 (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made 

6 by the families of members of the Armed Forces who 

7 have made the ultimate sacrifice in order to defend 

8 freedom and protect the United States and by the 

9 families of veterans of the Armed Forces; and 

10 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

11 to observe Gold Star Families Remembrance Week 

12 by— 

13 (A) performing acts of service and good 

14 will in their communities; and 

15 (B) celebrating families in which loved 

16 ones have made the ultimate sacrifice so that 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 522 IS 

1 others could continue to enjoy life, liberty, and 

2 the pursuit of happiness. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
37.113-1 Waiver of cost allowability limitations. ( a ) The head of the agency may waive the 31.205-6(g)(6) cost allowability limitations on severance payments to foreign nationals for contracts that— ( 1 ) Provide significant support services for ( i ) members of the armed forces stationed or deployed outside the United States, or
( ii ) employees of an executive agency posted outside the United States; and
( 2 ) Will be performed in whole or in part outside the United States.
( b ) Waivers can be granted only before contract award.
( c ) Waivers cannot be granted for— ( 1 ) Military banking contracts, which are covered by 10 U.S.C. 3744(d); or
( 2 ) Severance payments made by a contractor to a foreign national employed by the contractor under a DOD service contract in the Republic of the Philippines, if the discontinuation of the foreign national is the result of the termination of basing rights of the United States military in the Republic of the Philippines (section 1351(b) of Public Law 102-484, 10 U.S.C. 1592, note).
[60 FR 42661, Aug. 16, 1995, as amended at 68 FR 43867, July 24, 2003; 87 FR 73900, Dec. 1, 2022]