alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020204EN.01001101.xml

| 18.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 June 2020

(2020/C 204/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1232 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4560 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89448 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5123 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0669 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 152,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7050 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,561 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 344,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4467 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8355 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,7012 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6292 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5204 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7049 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7395 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5650 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 362,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,2289 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9602 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5460 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 948,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8095 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,273 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 78,1853 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,055 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,8521 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,9416 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,5505 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1232

JPY

Japanese yen

120,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4560

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89448

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5123

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0669

ISK

Iceland króna

152,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7050

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,561

HUF

Hungarian forint

344,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4467

RON

Romanian leu

4,8355

TRY

Turkish lira

7,7012

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6292

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5204

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7049

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7395

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5650

KRW

South Korean won

1 362,21

ZAR

South African rand

19,2289

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9602

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5460

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 948,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8095

PHP

Philippine peso

56,273

RUB

Russian rouble

78,1853

THB

Thai baht

35,055

BRL

Brazilian real

5,8521

MXN

Mexican peso

24,9416

INR

Indian rupee

85,5505

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 46.306 Time-and-material and labor-hour contracts.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.246-6, Inspection—Time-and-Material and Labor-Hour, in solicitations and contracts when a time-and-material contract or a labor-hour contract is contemplated. If Government inspection and acceptance are to be performed at the contractor's plant, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its *Alternate I.*

[48 FR 42415, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 2666, Jan. 17, 1986]
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Randy Dale Barnett, Appellant

No. 06-15-00020-CV v.

Jerry Coyle, Appellee

Appeal from the 62nd District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 84100). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Randy Dale Barnett, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 14, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           25th National Conference on Mental Health Services Research (MHSR): Transforming Challenges into New Opportunities      

# 25th National Conference on Mental Health Services Research (MHSR): Transforming Challenges into New Opportunities

**Date:** August 2-3, 2022, 11:00 am – 6:00 pm ET 

The 2022 Mental Health Services Research Conference (MHSR) will take place virtually on August 2 and 3, 2022. The MHSR conference brings together leading mental health services researchers, clinicians, mental health advocates, and federal and non-federal partners to highlight scientific opportunities for the next generation of high-impact research to improve mental health care. The MHSR 2022 will feature keynote and plenary speakers and significant scientific advances presented as part of symposia, discussion groups, and posters. **Learn more and register.**
**Exhibit 21**

| SUBSIDIARIES OF ITUS CORPORATION              |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| Name of Company and Name Doing Business       |   | Jurisdiction of Organization |
| Anixa Diagnostics Corporation                 |   | Sate of Delaware |
| CopyTele International Ltd.                   |   | British Virgin Islands |
| CopyTele Marketing Inc.                       |   | British Virgin Islands |
| ITUS Patent Acquisition Corporation           |   | State of Delaware |
| J-Channel Industries Corporation              |   | State of Delaware |
| Loyalty Conversion Systems Corporation        |   | State of Delaware |
| Secure Web Conference Corporation             |   | State of Delaware |
| Encrypted Cellular Communications Corporation |  | State of Delaware |
| Auction Acceleration Corp.                    |  | State of Delaware |
| Cyber Instruments Technologies Corporation.   |  | State of Delaware |
| Meetrix IP, LLC                               |  | State of Texas |
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Focused Deterrence of High-Risk Individuals: Response Guide No. 13      

# Resource: Focused Deterrence of High-Risk Individuals: Response Guide No. 13

This guide, developed by the Center for Problem-Oriented Policing, describes the concept of focused deterrence initiatives (FDI), administering and leading an FDI, and applying focused deterrence to specific crime problems. Police and police departments can use this guide to design and implement local FDIs. **Learn more.**
# C_2020223EN.01001701.xml

| 7.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

6 July 2020

(2020/C 223/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1325 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4516 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90505 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4848 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0642 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 157,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,6218 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,705 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 352,83 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4689 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8375 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,7743 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6230 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5333 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7769 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7293 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5753 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 350,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,2761 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9498 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5610 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 328,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8441 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,871 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 81,3769 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,158 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,9745 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,1207 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,4535 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1325

JPY

Japanese yen

121,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4516

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90505

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4848

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0642

ISK

Iceland króna

157,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,6218

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,705

HUF

Hungarian forint

352,83

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4689

RON

Romanian leu

4,8375

TRY

Turkish lira

7,7743

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6230

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5333

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7769

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7293

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5753

KRW

South Korean won

1 350,51

ZAR

South African rand

19,2761

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9498

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5610

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 328,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8441

PHP

Philippine peso

55,871

RUB

Russian rouble

81,3769

THB

Thai baht

35,158

BRL

Brazilian real

5,9745

MXN

Mexican peso

25,1207

INR

Indian rupee

84,4535

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Brandon DEVERELL, Appellant.

No. 08-1164.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2008.

Filed: June 16, 2008.

*634Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After revoking Brandon Deverell’s supervised release, the district court1 sentenced him to 12 months in prison and 18 months of supervised release. Deverell appeals, arguing that the additional supervised-release term renders his sentence unreasonable because the prison term was adequate punishment for the violations, and the record failed to indicate the additional supervised release would accomplish anything.

We conclude that the district court’s addition of an 18-month term of supervised release to Deverell’s 12-month prison term did not render his revocation sentence unreasonable. The court, upon revoking Deverell’s supervised release, had the authority to sentence him to a term of imprisonment followed by a term of supervised release. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), (h). Although the court noted Deverell’s previous failures while on supervision, the court properly considered all applicable factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in deciding what revocation sentence to ultimately impose. *See United States v. Nelson,*453 F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir.2006) (appellate court reviews revocation sentence to determine whether it is unreasonable in relation to, inter alia, § 3553(a) factors and advisory Guidelines range). Finally, both the prison term and the supervised-release term are within the applicable statutory máximums. *See 18*U.S.C. §§ 3559(a)(3) (felony is Class C if maximum prison term is less than 25 years but 10 or more years), 3583(b)(2) (for Class C felony, maximum supervised release term is 3 years), 3583(e)(3) (for Class C felony, maximum prison term upon revocation of supervised release is 2 years), 3583(h) (supervised release component of revocation sentence “shall not exceed the term of supervised release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in the original term of supervised release, less any term of imprisonment that was imposed upon revocation of supervised release”).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2023

Projects funded for 2023-24:  MS Excel (54K)

## FY 2022

MS Excel

## FY 2021

Projects funded for 2021-22:  MS Excel (53K)

## FY 2020

Projects funded for 2020-21:  MS Excel (53K)

## FY 2019

Projects funded for 2019-20: MS Excel (60K)

## FY 2018

Projects funded for 2018-19: MS Excel (58K)

## FY 2017

Projects funded for 2017-18: MS Excel (58K)

## FY 2016

Projects funded for 2016-17: MS Excel (141K)

## FY 2015

Projects funded for 2015-16: MS Excel (146K) | PDF (640K)

## FY 2014

Projects funded for 2014-15: MS Excel (135K) | PDF (623K)

## FY 2013

Projects funded for 2013-14: MS Excel (136K)

## FY 2012

Projects funded for 2012-13: MS Excel (131K) | PDF (605K)

## FY 2011

Projects funded for 2011-12: MS Excel (171K) | PDF (349K)

TRIO Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### Carl Bildner, Respondent, v Willard Malkan et al., Defendants. Barbara Malkan, Appellant.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 7, 1978, which, *inter alia,*denied defendant Barbara Malkan’s motion to enjoin restraint on her property, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Insofar as the appeal seeks review of denial of vacatur of the restraining notice, it is unanimously dismissed as moot. Carl Bildner is the judgment creditor of Willard Malkan. Barbara Malkan, the wife of Willard, is not a judgment debtor of Bildner. During the course of supplementary proceedings, Bildner issued a restraining notice upon Barbara’s counsel, a third party, in possession of property belonging to Barbara Malkan. Barbara’s motion to vacate the restraint was denied at Special Term. During the pendency of this appeal, the plaintiff’s attorney stipulated to vacate the restraining notice issued, and therefore the appeal from that portion of the order of Special Term has been rendered moot. Parenthetically, we note that had the issue not been mooted, we would have reversed that portion of the order of Special Term and vacated the restraining notice. Plaintiff had not shown that Barbara’s counsel held property in which the judgment debtor had an interest. We agree with Special Term, however, that an injunction prohibiting future restraints should not issue, *842since no illegal action has been taken or is threatened. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Lane, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
Native American-Serving Nontribal Institutions Program FY 2022 New Awards
- Office of Postsecondary Education - Applicant and Grantee Resources

FIPSE Home
#### Samuel Goldberg, Respondent, v. Lee W. Rivers, Jr., as Administrator of the Estate of Vivian K. Rivers, Deceased, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for injury to person and property, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 26, 1963 after trial upon a jury’s verdict, as awarded $12,500 to plaintiff for the personal injury. Defendant’s only contention is that such award is excessive. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the facts; cause of action for personal injury severed; and a new trial granted as to such cause of action, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce to $8,500 the amount of the verdict in his favor upon said cause of action for personal injury, and to modify the judgment accordingly. If such stipulation be served and filed, the judgment, as thus reduced and modified, and insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the evidence shows that, as a result of this accident, plaintiff suffered an aggravation of a long pre-existing back condition and that this condition was not a new injury. In view of this fact and in view of the paucity of special damages and the absence of any medical treatments since plaintiff’s discharge by his doctor eight months after the accident, the jury’s assessment of the damages was excessive at least to the extent indicated. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
exhibit10-165.htm






  



  







CONFIDENTIAL  
Exhibit 10.165




*** Confidential Portion has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment by the Company to, and the material has been separately filed with, the SEC. Each omitted Confidential Portion is marked by three Asterisks.





FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE FULL-TIME-TRANSPONDER CAPACITY AGREEMENT (PRE-LAUNCH)









This Fifth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) (the “Fifth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 30th day of September, 2008 by and between INTELSAT
CORPORATION, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Intelsat”), and GCI COMMUNICATION CORP., an Alaskan corporation (“Customer”).





RECITALS





WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) dated as of March 31, 2006, as amended on February 15, 2008, April 9, 2008, and June 4, 2008, (collectively, the “Agreement”) between Intelsat and Customer, Intelsat is providing
Customer with *** (***) *** transponders and *** (***) *** transponders on Galaxy 18, and *** (***) *** transponder, *** (***) *** transponder on Horizons 1, and an additional *** (***) *** Transponder Segment on Horizons 1;





WHEREAS, Customer and Intelsat wish to amend the terms of the Agreement to extend the Capacity Term for the Additional *** Capacity;





AGREEMENT





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:






	
1.  
	
Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.









	
2.  
	
Capacity Term.  The Capacity Term for the Additional *** Capacity shall continue until 23:59 Greenwich Mean Time on ***.









	
3.  
	
Monthly Fee.  The Monthly Fee for the *** of Additional *** Capacity shall be US$***,*** per month.









	
4.  
	
Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the amendment remain in full force and effect.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed and delivered this Third Amendment as of the day and year above written.









INTELSAT CORPORATION                                                                                                                          
 GCI COMMUNICATION CORP.







	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Patricia Casey
	 	 	
/s/ Jimmy R. Sipes
	 
	
Name: Patricia Casey
	 	 	
Name: Jimmy R. Sipes
	 
	
Title: Senior VP and Deputy General Counsel
	 	 	
Title: VP Network Services & Chief Engineer