Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2013 / Proposed Rules 37997 

availability of this financing, the extent 

to which manufactured housing 

currently is incentivized, and the 

availability of energy efficiency 

incentive programs available to 

manufactured home purchasers. DOE 

also is interested in information on the 

existence of financing structures offered 

by utilities, manufacturers, lenders, and 

federal, state, and local governments, 

and the estimated payback associated 

with each method of financing. 

(3) Model systems of enforcement. 

DOE received comments in response to 

the ANOPR that included urging DOE to 

rely on HUD’s existing enforcement 

system rather than develop a separate 

DOE system of enforcement, 

encouraging DOE develop a separate 

compliance certification system that 

would be independent of the existing 

HUD certification system, and 

recommending that DOE rely on the 

EPA ENERGY STAR verification and 

labeling program to ensure compliance 

with the DOE energy efficiency 

standards. DOE is interested in 

receiving additional information that 

commenters believe would be useful to 

DOE regarding suggested characteristics 

in developing a model system of 

enforcement for DOE’s energy efficiency 

standards. 

(4) Suggested sources, studies, and 

research results of other information 

considered relevant to DOE’s effort to 

establish energy standards for 

manufactured housing. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 18, 

2013. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2013–15055 Filed 6–24–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0611; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–AWP–11] 

Proposed Amendment of Class D 

Airspace; Santa Monica, CA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking (SNPRM). 

SUMMARY: This SNPRM would further 

modify the Class D airspace area at 

Santa Monica Municipal Airport, Santa 

Monica, CA. In a NPRM published in 

the Federal Register of October, 27, 

2011, the FAA proposed to create 

additional Class D airspace at Santa 

Monica Municipal Airport. The FAA 

has reassessed the proposal and finds 

that further enlargement of the airspace 

area is necessary for the safety and 

management of Instrument Flight Rules 

(IFR) operations in the Santa Monica, 

CA, area. The geographic coordinates of 

the airport also would be adjusted. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before August 9, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 

366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2011–0611; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–AWP–11, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard Roberts, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; 

telephone (425) 203–4517. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On October 27, 2011, the FAA 

published a NPRM to modify Class D 

airspace, at Santa Monica Municipal 

Airport, Santa Monica, CA (76 FR 

66662). The comment period closed 

December 12, 2011. No comments were 

received. Subsequent to publication, the 

Los Angeles Visual Flight Rules (VFR) 

Airspace Task Force identified airspace 

in the areas adjacent to Los Angeles 

International Airport as highly 

congested with participating and nonparticipating VFR aircraft. This action 

would increase the level of safety for 

aircraft in the Santa Monica, CA, 

airspace area. The FAA seeks comments 

on this SNPRM. 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA 

2011–0611 and Airspace Docket No. 11– 

AWP–11) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management System (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2011–0611 and 

Airspace Docket No. 11–AWP–11’’. The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified closing date for 

comments will be considered before 

taking action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

closing date for comments. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRM’s 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http:// 

www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/ 

air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for the address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the Northwest 

Mountain Regional Office of the Federal 

Aviation Administration, Air Traffic 

Organization, Western Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRM’s should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37998 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

The Supplemental Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) Part 71 by further modifying 

the size of the Class D airspace area at 

Santa Monica Municipal Airport, Santa 

Monica, CA, to accommodate IFR 

aircraft departing and arriving at the 

airport. The airspace would be 

increased from a 2.7-mile radius to a 4- 

mile radius of the airport, leaving the 

extension to the northeast the same as 

the NPRM. The geographic coordinates 

of the airport would also be updated to 

coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical 

database. Expanding the current Santa 

Monica Municipal Airport Class D 

airspace would reduce those areas that 

pose a high collision risk to low level 

commercial, general aviation, military 

and helicopter operations. 

Class D airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 5000, of FAA 

Order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, 

and effective September 15, 2012, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class D airspace designation 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in this Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) 

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this proposed rule, 

when promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

Section 106, describes the authority for 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of the airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it would 

modify controlled airspace at Santa 

Monica Municipal Airport, Santa 

Monica, CA. 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9W, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 8, 2012, and 

effective September 15, 2012 is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 5000 Class D airspace. 

* * * * * 

AWP CA D Santa Monica, CA [Modified] 

Santa Monica Municipal Airport, CA 

(Lat. 34°00′57′′ N., long. 118°27′05′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface to and including 2,700 feet MSL 

within a 4-mile radius of the Santa Monica 

Municipal Airport and within 1.5 miles each 

side of the 047° bearing of the Santa Monica 

Airport extending from the 4-mile radius to 

4.6 miles northeast of the airport, excluding 

that airspace within the Los Angeles, CA, 

Class D airspace area. This Class D airspace 

area is effective during the specific dates and 

times established in advance by a Notice to 

Airmen. The effective date and time will 

thereafter be continuously published in the 

Airport/Facility Directory. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 17, 

2013. 

Clark Desing, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Western 

Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2013–15133 Filed 6–24–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Indian Gaming Commission 

25 CFR Part 502 

Electronic One Touch Bingo System 

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming 

Commission. 

ACTION: Request for Public Comment. 

SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming 

Commission (NIGC) is seeking comment 

on a proposed reinterpretation of an 

agency decision regarding the 

classification of server based electronic 

bingo system games that can be played 

utilizing only one touch of a button 

(‘‘one touch bingo’’). The proposed 

reinterpretation is in response to 

questions the NIGC received from the 

regulated community and the public 

about whether one touch bingo is a 

Class II or Class III game. 

DATES: The agency must receive 

comments on or before August 26, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

to the Commission by any one of the 

following methods, but please note that 

comments sent by electronic mail are 

strongly encouraged. 

D Email comments to: 

reg.review@nigc.gov. 

D Mail comments to: National Indian 

Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street 

NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 

20005. 

D Hand deliver comments to: 1441 L 

Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 

20005. 

D Fax comments to: National Indian 

Gaming Commission at 202–632–0045. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Hoenig, National Indian 

Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street 

NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 

20005. Telephone: 202–632–7009; 

email: reg.review@nigc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information 

This notice is directed to the public 

in general and may be of interest to a 

wide range of parties, including, but not 

limited to, tribal gaming operations, 

tribal gaming regulators, and tribal, 

state, and local governments. The NIGC 

is inviting interested parties to 

participate in this proposed 

reinterpretation by submitting such 

written data, views, or arguments as 

they may desire. Comments that provide 

the factual basis supporting the views 

and suggestions presented are 

particularly helpful in developing 

reasoned decisions on the proposal. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS