alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer



I, Jerrold J. Pellizzon, Chief Financial Officer of Ceradyne, Inc.
(the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 9, 2005



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|/s/    JERROLD J.
PELLIZZON                 
|Jerrold J. Pellizzon Chief Financial Officer
#### Drury L. Schoonheim, Respondent, v. Lambertus R. P. Schoonheim, Appellant.

In an action .by a wife for a judicial separation, the husband appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 3, 1964, wMch granted the wife’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fees; and (2) from an order of said court, dated Ptibruary 21, 1964, which denied his motion to resettle *the*order of January 3, 1964 *so*as to recite the record on a prior separation action between the parties. Orders reversed, without costs; motion for resettlement granted; and motion for alimony and counsel fee denied. It was error to deny resettlement, since the record referred to was submittted to the court by the husband in opposing the wife’s motion. Before a wife may be granted alimony and counsel fees *pendente lite*there must be (a) proof that the wife is unable to support herself from her own funds while the action is pending; and (b) proof of *the*husband’s ability to pay the alimony requested *(Haas*v. *Haas,*271 App. Div. 107; Grossman, Domestic Relations, p. 626). The moving papers must also show some reasonable probability of success *(Barber*v. *Barber,*11 A D 2d 561; *Seltzer*v. *813
      *Seltzer,*16 A D 2d 836, mot. for réarg. den. 16 A D 2d 984). In our opinion, the record before us satisfies none of these requirements. Plaintiff has no children and she nowhere alleges that she is either without funds or unable to find employment. Plaintiff does not deny defendant’s allegation that, when she left him, she took $60,000 worth of jewels and furs. In a separation action which was resolved adversely to plaintiff only a few months before she brought the action now before ns, the court found that the defendant became financially embarrassed in attempting to maintain plaintiff in the manner she thought appropriate; and the court further found that plaintiff was then a “ confused person ”; and that she *“*refused to face the changing financial situation.” These findings augur ill for plaintiff’s success in the present action (see *Deisler*v. *Deisler,*65 App. Div. 208). Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Raibin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Logan Plateau: a youngphysiographic region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee**
 
Report | Plates: 010203040506
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1620
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000963637
 
October 5, 2018
CORALS, BRYOZOAN, AND BRACHIOPODS (ORTHACEA), BIGHORN AND
RED RIVER FORMATIONS
#### 53.210-53.211 [Reserved]
# C_2021210EN.01000701.xml

| 3.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 June 2021

(2021/C 210/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2186 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86125 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0898 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0982 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1393 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,465 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 346,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4653 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9208 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,4641 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5756 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4705 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4555 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6843 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6129 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 356,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7269 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7812 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5043 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 391,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0267 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,312 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 89,5138 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,959 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2891 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,3207 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,0830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2186

JPY

Japanese yen

133,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86125

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0898

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0982

ISK

Iceland króna

146,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1393

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,465

HUF

Hungarian forint

346,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4653

RON

Romanian leu

4,9208

TRY

Turkish lira

10,4641

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5756

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4705

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4555

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6843

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6129

KRW

South Korean won

1 356,11

ZAR

South African rand

16,7269

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7812

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5043

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 391,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0267

PHP

Philippine peso

58,312

RUB

Russian rouble

89,5138

THB

Thai baht

37,959

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2891

MXN

Mexican peso

24,3207

INR

Indian rupee

89,0830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Quepasa





Exhibit 10.1

Summary of Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement by and between BRC Group, LLC and

Quepasa Corporation, dated as of September 22, 2009

On the 22nd day of September 2009, following mediation held on the same date in the case then pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entitled BRC Group, LLC (“BRC”) v. Quepasa Corporation (the “Company”) (Case No. CV 09-1506) (the “Action”), the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement (the “Agreement”) with BRC outlining the terms pursuant to which the parties agreed to settle the Action, to wit: (a) the Company agrees to reduce the outstanding indebtedness of BRC to the Company from $350,000 to $250,000, which indebtedness shall be evidenced by a Promissory Note (the “Note”) in such amount, dated September 22, 2009, executed by BRC in favor of the Company, with a repayment term of eighteen (18) months.  Interest shall accrue on the Note commencing on February 1, 2011 at the rate of four percent (4%) per annum (provided that if any note due to a BRC insider shall bear interest at a higher rate, such higher rate shall also apply to the Note), and BRC shall commence making monthly payments on June 1, 2011.  The Note shall be secured by the issuance of a warrant by BRC in favor of the Company which shall permit the Company to receive up to a thirty percent (30%) membership interest in BRC should BRC default under any of the terms of the Note.  Should BRC default under any term of the Note, and not cure such default within the thirty (30) day period immediately following the date of the default (the “Cure Period”), the Company may exercise such portion of the warrant and purchase such units of membership interest in BRC which would be equivalent in value to the unpaid amount due to the Company.  The Company shall not be required to issue a notice of default to BRC.  BRC shall then have ninety (90) days from the last day of the Cure Period to repurchase any membership interest in BRC acquired by the Company for consideration payable to the Company equal to the amount of principal and interest due under the Note to the date of repurchase; (b) any and all agreements entered into by and between the Company and BRC prior to September 22, 2009 shall be terminated; (c) BRC and the Company shall execute Mutual General Releases as of September 22, 2009 of all matters in the Action including waivers of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code; and (d) the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall be more fully described in a Settlement Agreement, Note and Warrant and Release of Claims to be signed by BRC and the Company.  In the event that no such Settlement Agreement, Note or Warrant is signed by the parties, the Agreement shall serve as a valid and enforceable contract.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; RFA DK20-024: NIDDK Catalyst Award (DP-1).                    

*Date:*                         May 18, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Najma Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7349, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8894,                         *begumn@niddk.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 8, 2021.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-02842 Filed 2-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2018271EN.01000101.xml

| 2.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 August 2018

Euro exchange rates (2)

1 August 2018

(2018/C 271/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1696 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4514 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89040 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2995 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1589 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5380 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,590 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 321,36 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2720 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6240 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,7654 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5767 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5231 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1807 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7187 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5922 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 307,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5145 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9519 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4020 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 889,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7556 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,940 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,4672 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,725 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4028 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8040 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,9705 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1696

JPY

Japanese yen

130,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4514

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89040

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2995

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1589

ISK

Iceland króna

123,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5380

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,590

HUF

Hungarian forint

321,36

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2720

RON

Romanian leu

4,6240

TRY

Turkish lira

5,7654

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5767

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5231

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1807

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7187

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5922

KRW

South Korean won

1 307,40

ZAR

South African rand

15,5145

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9519

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4020

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 889,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7556

PHP

Philippine peso

61,940

RUB

Russian rouble

73,4672

THB

Thai baht

38,725

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4028

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8040

INR

Indian rupee

79,9705

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
447.305-10 Packing, marking, and consignment instructions. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 452.247-71, Marking Deliverables, in solicitations and contracts if special marking on deliverables (other than reports) are required.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.247-72, Packing for Domestic Shipment, in contracts when item(s) will be delivered for immediate use to a destination in the continental United States; when the material specification or purchase description does not provide preservation, packaging, packing, and/or marking requirements; and/or when the requiring activity has not cited a specific specification for packaging.
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.247-73, Packing for Overseas Shipment, in contracts when item(s) will be delivered to an overseas destination for immediate use, the material specification does not specify packing levels, and the required activity has not specified such requirements.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; corrections.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Election Assistance Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         regarding the scheduled Accessibility Survey and Lessons Learned Roundtable Discussion. The Notice appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 2, 2021 in FR Doc. 2021-02197, on page 7863 in the second column. The                         **DATES**                         section should be corrected to read:                    

# DATES:

Wednesday, February 17, 2021, 11:30 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Eastern.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-9285, Email:                         *kmuthig@eac.gov.*

Amanda Joiner,

Associate Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-02891 Filed 2-9-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6188** 

FRANK M. NEFF , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 03487

- RDB )

Submitted : April 25, 2013 Decided: April 30, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Frank M. Neff , Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Frank M. Neff seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S. C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies thi s standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Neff has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the a ppeal. We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal c ontentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
# C_2019139EN.01000101.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 139/01)

Last publication

OJ C 131, 8.4.2019

Past publications

OJ C 122, 1.4.2019

OJ C 112, 25.3.2019

OJ C 103, 18.3.2019

OJ C 93, 11.3.2019

OJ C 82, 4.3.2019

OJ C 72, 25.2.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 10577 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Bradley C. Stark,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:08

- CR

- 258

- 1

Before **Jones, Barksdale,** and **Stewart,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * A jury convicted Bradley C. Star k on seven counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and one count of securities fraud, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 77 q (a) and 77x. The district court sentenced him to, inter alia ,

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 9, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-10577 Document: 00515667149 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2020No. 20

- 10577

2 276

- months’ imprisonment : concurrent 240

- month terms on the wire

- fraud
counts ; a consecutive 36

- month term on the securities

- fraud count. Proceeding pro se , Stark, federal prisoner # 69122

- 053, challenges the denial of his motion for : a sentence reduction ; or compassionate release. Regarding a sentence redu c tion, he claims: Amendment 792 to the Sentencing Guidelines amended, inter alia , the “sophisticated means” enhancement under Guideline § 2B1.1 . As for compassionate release, he maintains: he is vulnerable to the COVID

- 19 virus due to his obesity, hyper lipidemia, and family history of heart disease, high blood pressure, and stroke. Each claim fail s
. For the sentence

- reduction claim, a court , under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), may reduce a n imposed term of imprisonment based on a Guideline Amendment ’s lowerin g a Guideline sentencing range
. Stark acknowledges Amendment 792 was not listed in Guideline § 1B1.10(d) and , therefore , does not apply retroactively to his Guidelines sentencing range
. Concerning the compassionate

- release claim , the denial of a prisoner’s motion for such release is reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Rivas , No. 20

- 10360, 2020 WL 6437288, at * 2 (5th Cir. 2 Nov. 2020)

. D efendant’s term of imprisonment may be reduced by a court if, inter alia , “extra ordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction ”. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) (i)

. The district court conclud ed there were no such reasons for Stark’s sentence reduction because : his medical conditions did not present a unique circumstance ; and he was not a t a heightened risk of exposure to the virus. There was no abuse of discretion

. **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-10577 Document: 00515667149 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/09/2020
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CRAVEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Samuel Craven.

No opinion. Motion granted.