alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2300 N S TREET , N W

S UITE 700

W ASHINGTON , D C 20037

T E L 202.783.4141

F A X 202.783.5851

WWW

. WBKLAW

. COM
November 29, 2013

MEMORANDUM

To: DOE Ex Parte Communications ( expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov )

From: Scott Blake Harris

Re: Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products and Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Proposed Determination of Computer Servers as a Covered Consumer Product, EERE -2013- BT

- DET -0034

Pursuant to the guidance issued by the Office of General Counsel in its Notice of Guidance on Ex Parte Communications, 74 F.R. 197, this memorandum summarizes a November 22, 2013 meeting between Cisco Systems, Inc. ( “ Cisco ”) and Department staff regarding the abovereferenced Proposed Determination. The meeting participants were Daniel Cohen, Assistant General Counsel; John Cymbalsky and Jeremy Dommu of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; Jen nifer Sanford, Senior Manager, International Trade and Energy Policy, Cisco; and Scott Blake Harris , Managing Partner of Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP, counsel to Cisco.

Consistent with Cisco ’ s comments filed in th is proceeding, Cisco argued that the proposed definition of “ server ” is too broad and, as such, covers products tha t are not of the same “type” in any meaningful way. Cisco also explained that network- based and data center “servers” are not consumer products or part of a class of products that can be considered consumer products, and thus the proposed determination is legally i mpermissible. Moreover, Cisco argued that the Department’s conclusion that servers meet the energy usage threshold for the proposed determination is arbitrary and does not meet statutory requirements.

Cisco suggested that regardless of whether the Department agrees with these arguments on the merits, it should recognize that they are substantial and could be accepted by a court. Cisco argued that i t would be a waste of DOE and private sector resources to spend two years on the substantive rule making process , only to learn upon appeal that servers cannot be regulated. Thus, if the Department seeks to move forward in regulating server energy efficiency, it should ensure that any determination it issues constitutes final agency action that can be tested in court before the rulemaking process commences

.

Cisco appreciate s the opportunity to meet with the Department and is available to provide further information upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                 <F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-22-1997<F1>
<CASH>                                          25,773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  703,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                    58,410
<INVENTORY>                                    518,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,159,057
<PP&E>                                       1,650,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 628,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,542,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          656,373
<BONDS>                                        936,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       320,525
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,542,043
<SALES>                                        964,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               964,992
<CGS>                                          813,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  813,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,043
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,043
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S FISCAL YEAR ENDS ON THE SATURDAY CLOSEST TO DECEMBER 31. 
FISCAL YEAR 1997 CONSISTS OF 52 WEEKS AND ENDS ON JANUARY 3, 1998.  ALL 
QUARTERS IN 1997 HAVE 12 WEEKS, EXCEPT THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1997 WHICH HAS
16 WEEKS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
47.207-11 Volume movements within the contiguous United States. ( a ) For purposes of contract administration, a volume movement is— ( 1 ) In DoD, the aggregate of freight shipments amounting to or exceeding 25 carloads, 25 truckloads, or 500,000 pounds, to move during the contract period from one origin point for delivery to one destination point or area; and
( 2 ) In civilian agencies, 50 short tons (100,000 pounds) in the aggregate to move during the contract period from one origin point for delivery to one destination point or area.
( b ) Transportation personnel assigned to or supporting the CAO, or appropriate agency personnel, shall report planned and actual volume movements in accordance with agency regulations. DoD activities report to the Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC) under DoD 4500.9-R, Defense Transportation Regulation. Civilian agencies report to the local office of GSA's Office of Transportation (see *www.gsa.gov/transportation* (click on Transportation Management Zone Offices in left-hand column, then click on Transportation Management Zones under Contacts on right-hand column).
[71 FR 205, Jan. 3, 2006]
# C_2021218EN.01000301.xml

| 8.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 June 2021

(2021/C 218/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2162 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85825 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0552 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0934 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0483 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,400 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 345,91 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4662 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9234 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,4902 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5678 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4681 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4355 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6832 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6093 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 351,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,3923 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7795 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5005 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 325,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0205 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,930 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 88,6023 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,933 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1389 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,0450 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,5305 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2162

JPY

Japanese yen

132,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85825

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0552

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0934

ISK

Iceland króna

146,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0483

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,400

HUF

Hungarian forint

345,91

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4662

RON

Romanian leu

4,9234

TRY

Turkish lira

10,4902

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5678

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4681

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4355

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6832

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6093

KRW

South Korean won

1 351,23

ZAR

South African rand

16,3923

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7795

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5005

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 325,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0205

PHP

Philippine peso

57,930

RUB

Russian rouble

88,6023

THB

Thai baht

37,933

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1389

MXN

Mexican peso

24,0450

INR

Indian rupee

88,5305

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Spencer Thomas, Also Known as Spencer Singleton, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on March 1, 1977, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur— Lupiano, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Fein and Markewich, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THOMAS PATHAMMAVONG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2505

[November 7, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-4984 CF10A.

Thomas Pathammavong, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1.

 
     **5. **This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemedan original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the day and year writtenabove.         **CYPRESS BIOSCIENCE, INC.**   **EMPLOYEE**           By: /s/ Sabrina Martucci Johnson   /s/ Jay D. Kranzler             Sabrina Martucci Johnson   JAY D. KRANZLER, M.D., Ph.D.  Its: Executive Vice President,Chief Operating Officerand Chief Financial Officer      
2.
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 55 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2023 

Mr. YAKYM submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 55 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall 

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three4 fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall 

5 provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts 

6 by a rollcall vote. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The limit on the debt of the United 

8 States held by the public shall not be increased, unless 

9 three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall pro10 vide by law for such an increase by a rollcall vote. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President 

12 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the 

13 United States Government for that fiscal year in which 

14 total outlays do not exceed total receipts. 

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become 

16 law unless approved by a majority of the whole number 

17 of each House by a rollcall vote. 

18 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions 

19 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

20 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be 

21 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is 

22 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and 

23 serious military threat to national security and is so de24 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the 

25 whole number of each House, which becomes law. Any 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HJ 55 IH 

1 such waiver must identify and be limited to the specific 

2 excess or increase for that fiscal year made necessary by 

3 the identified military conflict. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple5 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely 

6 on estimates of outlays and receipts. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 7. Total receipts shall include all receipts 

8 of the United States Government except those derived 

9 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of 

10 the United States Government except for those for repay11 ment of debt principal. 

12 ‘‘SECTION 8. This article shall take effect beginning 

13 with the fifth fiscal year beginning after its ratification.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### 352.233-71 Litigation and Claims.

As prescribed in HHSAR 333.215-70(b), the Contracting Officer shall insert the following clause:

# Litigation and Claims (DEC 2015)

(a) The Contractor shall provide written notification immediately to the Contracting Officer of any action, including any proceeding before an administrative agency, filed against the Contractor arising out of the performance of this contract, including, but not limited to the performance of any subcontract hereunder; and any claim against the Contractor the cost and expense of which is allowable under the clause entitled “Allowable Cost and Payment.”

(b) Except as otherwise directed by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall furnish immediately to the Contracting Officer copies of all pertinent documents received by the Contractor with respect to such action or claim. To the extent not in conflict with any applicable policy of insurance, the Contractor may, with the Contracting Officer's approval, settle any such action or claim. If required by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall effect an assignment and subrogation in favor of the Government of all the Contractor's rights and claims (except those against the Government) arising out of any such action or claim against the Contractor; and authorize representatives of the Government to settle or defend any such action or claim and to represent the Contractor in, or to take charge of, any action.

(c) If the Government undertakes a settlement or defense of an action or claim, the Contractor shall furnish all reasonable assistance in effecting a settlement or asserting a defense. Where an action against the Contractor is not covered by a policy of insurance, the Contractor shall, with the approval of the Contracting Officer, proceed with the defense of the action in good faith. The Government shall not be liable for the expense of defending any action or for any costs resulting from the loss thereof to the extent that the Contractor would have been compensated by insurance which was required by other terms or conditions of this contract, by law or regulation, or by written direction of the Contracting Officer, but which the Contractor failed to secure through its own fault or negligence. In any event, unless otherwise expressly provided in this contract, the Government shall not reimburse or indemnify the Contractor for any liability loss, cost, or expense, which the Contractor may incur or be subject to by reason of any loss, injury or damage, to the person or to real or personal property of any third parties as may accrue during, or arise from, the performance of this contract.

(End of clause)
#### 503.104 Procurement integrity.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Change and Implementation in Practice: Teaming Worksheets      

# Resource: Change and Implementation in Practice: Teaming Worksheets

This webpage contains a set of fillable worksheets to bring together teams’ varied expertise, skills, and perspectives to guide child welfare change and implementation activities. Child welfare teams should complete the worksheets to: 
                  -  Review team membership and discuss representation on their change and implementation team  
                  -  Consider engagement of individuals who have direct experience with the issue being addressed or the services that will be delivered  
                  -  Discuss how the team operates and how it supports inclusive and equitable teaming practices  
                  -  Identify next steps to strengthen a diverse and inclusive team  

**Learn more.**
Docket No: F AA-201 0-0683 

Directorate ID: l 0-NE-25 

Disposition Comments 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3075EN-E 

Next Step: DFRAN DSNPRM 

D These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

[gJ No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received- If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

No l-Ias the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? 

If yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the 

previously published NP RM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point 

for guidance. Latc:--t Rc\ i.:-:i('l1. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: Ch ... w:-~ ~.•r,c. 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): Click her..: 1,1 cnkr t..:·..t. 

What change to the AD action is requested? Ui..:k here 1\.1 ~111-..:r 1~.'\l. 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? C!i..:h. here !<..1 cnt;.:r te.'\t. 

Do we agree? Yc:-> \: ... 1 

If YES, we agree because ln~ert ju~ti li..:ati ... )n Make the following changes to the AD: l.i"'! ~11:\ 

..:km:;~..·:..:. h1 th..: .\D 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with !n'i .. .'rt t..:xt because ln..;..:rt ju . ..;riti..:~lj·,•n We disagree with 

11~>-.?rt k'\t because ln-:cn .iu--ti t:..:.:tidn Make the following changes to the AD: 1. i '-l ~m:. 

..:kmo;c-: l\' tb._·. \D 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: ( ·!~' ·,, ': \ ·;~~..·. 

If other, explain: CL: .. 1>2!\.: !·.' ._'i:· .::· i . .:·~J. 

What change to the AD action is requested?', i: ~ ·, l~·.:;·.:· :-

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 1. 

Do we agree?";·.-~ '. 

Page 1 of3 
If YES, we agree because I· .. ,·..::·t.i•.:,~l!"i:.~~=·· :1 Make the following changes to the AD: l.i.'t ,!!l".. 

-:hcl;)~<..':O.[<J[IJ.,; .\)) 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with lt~<rlt..:>.t because Ll-:.::;._k~rific,!li. ·n We disagree with 

In.~~·r; t..::'\1 because Jn...,..:n .i u:-.ti fi..:~tt~.,:J Make the fo1lowing changes to the AD: l.i:;t ~1~1:, 

..:lun;;;..:..; ll' th .... • .\D 

If NO, we don't agree because ln..:...:rt ''~tr r~:ti.'IUL' 

For additional issues, double~click here 

Page 2 of3 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3075EN-E 

ASE ~t~ Printed Name: Christopher McGuire Date 

~ 

r::r r 

c, /' ( /[ ( "B,-ra:-n,-c7h-;M-:;a,-n""'a"'"ge:-r---------- Date 

Page 3 of3
<PAGE>

                           Verizon Washington, DC Inc.


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Six Months Ended
(Dollars in Thousands)                                                              June 30, 2002
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                             <C>
Income before provision for income taxes and extraordinary item                          $ 48,865
Equity in income from affiliate                                                              (113)
Dividends received from equity affiliate                                                        3
Interest expense                                                                            6,885
Portion of rent expense representing interest                                               4,856
Amortization of capitalized interest                                                          646
                                                                                ---------------------

Earnings, as adjusted                                                                    $ 61,142
                                                                                =====================

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                                                          $ 6,885
Portion of rent expense representing interest                                               4,856
Capitalized interest                                                                          610
                                                                                ---------------------

Fixed Charges                                                                            $ 12,351
                                                                                =====================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                                           4.95
                                                                                =====================
</TABLE>