alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 52.227-9 Refund of Royalties.

As prescribed in 27.202-5(c), insert the following clause:

# Refund of Royalties (APR 1984)

(a) The contract price includes certain amounts for royalties payable by the Contractor or subcontractors or both, which amounts have been reported to the Contracting Officer.

(b) The term *royalties* as used in this clause refers to any costs or charges in the nature of royalties, license fees, patent or license amortization costs, or the like, for the use of or for rights in patents and patent applications in connection with performing this contract or any subcontract hereunder.

(c) The Contractor shall furnish to the Contracting Officer, before final payment under this contract, a statement of royalties paid or required to be paid in connection with performing this contract and subcontracts hereunder together with the reasons.

(d) The Contractor will be compensated for royalties reported under paragraph (c) above, only to the extent that such royalties were included in the contract price and are determined by the Contracting Officer to be properly chargeable to the Government and allocable to the contract. To the extent that any royalties that are included in the contract price are not in fact paid by the Contractor or are determined by the Contracting Officer not to be properly chargeable to the Government and allocable to the contract, the contract price shall be reduced. Repayment or credit to the Government shall be made as the Contracting Officer directs.

(e) If, at any time within 3 years after final payment under this contract, the Contractor for any reason is relieved in whole or in part from the payment of the royalties included in the final contract price as adjusted pursuant to paragraph (d) above, the Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer of that fact and shall reimburse the Government in a corresponding amount.

(f) The substance of this clause, including this paragraph (f), shall be included in any subcontract in which the amount of royalties reported during negotiation of the subcontract exceeds $250.

(End of clause)

[49 FR 12988, Mar. 30, 1984, as amended at 72 FR 63066, Nov. 7, 2007]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joey Levi JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-4883.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 3, 2008.

Decided: June 13, 2008.

James B. Loggins, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Green-ville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joey Levi Johnson appeals from his conviction and fifteen-month sentence after pleading guilty to one count of felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). Johnson’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but questioning whether the district court erred in sentencing Johnson. Johnson was given an opportunity to file a supplemental pro se brief, but has not done so. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Appellate courts review sentences imposed by district courts for reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard. *Gall v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); *United States v. Pauley,*511 F.3d 468, 473-74 (4th Cir.2007) (discussing procedure district courts must follow in sentencing defendant). “A sentence within the proper Sentencing Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable.” *United States v. Allen,*491 F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir.2007); *see Rita v. United States,*— U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462-69, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) (upholding presumption of reasonableness for within-guidelines sentence).

Here, the district court properly calculated the guideline range, appropriately treated the guidelines as advisory, and considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.CA. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). Johnson’s fifteen month sentence is the bottom of the guideline range and is below the statutory maximum sentence of ten years’ imprisonment. *See*18 U.S.C. § 924(a) (2000). Neither Johnson nor the record suggests any information so com*202pelling as to rebut the presumption that a sentence within the properly calculated guideline range is reasonable. We therefore conclude that the sentence is reasonable.

As required by *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### 52.216-28 Multiple Awards for Advisory and Assistance Services.

As prescribed in 16.506(g), insert the following provision:

# Multiple Awards for Advisory and Assistance Services (OCT 1995)

The Government intends to award multiple contracts for the same or similar advisory and assistance services to two or more sources under this solicitation unless the Government determines, after evaluation of offers, that only one offeror is capable of providing the services at the level of quality required.

(End of provision)

[60 FR 49728, Sept. 26, 1995]
First Department,

October, 1964 *

(October 15, 1964)

#### Security Options Corp. v. Richard Shelton.

*

 Not published with other decisions of October, 1964, 22 A D 2d 641.—[Rep.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, without prejudice to an application to vacate the dismissal and upon further condition that the appeal is perfected for the January 1965 Term. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Staley, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                CERTIFICATION

I,  Lawrence  Nash,  Chief  Executive Officer of Vista Continental Corporation,
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of Vista Continental
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain  any untrue statement of
a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state a material fact necessary  to  make  the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included  in  this  report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed  under  our  supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating to the registrant, including  its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end  of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's  internal  control
over financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report)  that has materially affected, or is reasonably  likely  to  materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  of the registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the  design or
operation  of  internal  control  over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,  that  involves  management  or  other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



                           Signed:  /s/ Lawrence Nash
                                  ------------------------------
                                   Name:    Lawrence Nash
                                   Title:   Chief Executive Officer

August 2, 2005
#### 52.241-13 Capital Credits.

As prescribed in 41.501(d)(7), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:

# Capital Credits (FEB 1995)

(a) The Government is a member of the ____ [*insert cooperative name*], and as any other member, is entitled to capital credits consistent with the bylaws of the cooperative, which states the obligation of the Contractor to pay capital credits and which specifies the method and time of payment.

(b) The Contractor shall furnish to the Contracting Officer, or the designated representative of the Contracting Officer, in writing, on an ____ basis [*insert period of time*] a list of accrued credits by contract number, year, and delivery point.

(c) Payment of capital credits will be made by check, payable to the ____ [*insert agency name*], and forwarded to the Contracting Officer at ____ [*insert agency address*], unless otherwise directed in writing by the Contracting Officer. Checks shall cite the current or last contract number and indicate whether the check is partial or final payment for all capital credits accrued.

(End of clause)

[59 FR 67025, Dec. 28, 1994]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10152 

To allow the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to enter into agreements with private and commercial entities 

and State governments to provide certain supplies, support, and services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2024 

Mr. EZELL (for himself and Mr. KELLY of Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 

Technology 

A BILL 

To allow the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration to enter into agreements with private and commercial entities and State governments to 

provide certain supplies, support, and services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Contracts and Obliga5 tions Modernization for Efficient Terms of Service Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘COMETS Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10152 IH

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRA2 TION AGREEMENTS WITH PRIVATE AND COM3 MERCIAL ENTITIES AND STATE GOVERN4 MENTS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN SUPPLIES, SUP5 PORT, AND SERVICES. 

6 Section 20113 of title 51, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(o) AGREEMENTS WITH COMMERCIAL ENTITIES

9 AND STATE GOVERNMENTS.—The Administration— 

10 ‘‘(1) may enter into an agreement with a pri11 vate or commercial entity or a State government to 

12 provide the entity or State government with supplies, 

13 support, and services related to private, commercial, 

14 or State government space activities carried on at a 

15 property owned or operated by the Administration; 

16 and 

17 ‘‘(2) on request by such an entity or State gov18 ernment, may include such supplies, support, and 

19 services in the requirements of the Administration 

20 if— 

21 ‘‘(A) the Administrator determines that 

22 the inclusion of such supplies, support, or serv23 ices in such requirements— 

24 ‘‘(i) is in the best interest of the Fed25 eral Government; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 10152 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) does not interfere with the re2 quirements of the Administration; and 

3 ‘‘(iii) does not compete with the com4 mercial space activities of other such enti5 ties or State governments; and 

6 ‘‘(B) the Administration has full reimburs7 able funding from the entity or State govern8 ment that requested such supplies, support, and 

9 services before making any obligation for the 

10 delivery of the supplies, support, or services 

11 under an Administration procurement contract 

12 or any other agreement.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Recurrence of Maltreatment      

# Resource: Recurrence of Maltreatment

This factsheet (PDF, 2 pages) helps child welfare leaders, managers, data and continuous quality improvement (CQI) staff, and others understand and explain the Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) statewide data indicator recurrence of maltreatment. This indicator measures whether children who were subject of a substantiated or indicated report of abuse or neglect experience subsequent maltreatment. **Learn more.**
Second District.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Elmer Mizer et al., plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 7,538.

Conviction of violation of Prohibition Act. Error of the County Court of Rock Island county; the Hon. George D. Long, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1925.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 29, 1926.

Kenworthy, Dietz, Shallberg, Harper & Sinnett, for plaintiffs in error.

Oscar Carlstrom, Attorney General, and Benjamin S. Bell, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; Edward L. Eagle, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Partlow

delivered the opinion of the court.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15

                          AMENDMENT TO CEO AGREEMENT



     This Amendment to CEO Agreement is entered into by and between Sterling
Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Sterling L.
Williams, an individual ("Williams"), as of this 31st day of May, 1998.

     WHEREAS, the Company and Williams are parties to that certain CEO Agreement
(the "CEO Agreement"), dated as of February 12, 1996.

     WHEREAS, Section 7 of the CEO Agreement provides for an offer by the
Company to Williams of increased compensation for full employment by the Company
in the event Williams' employment at Sterling Commerce is terminated;

     WHEREAS, Williams' employment at Sterling Commerce has been terminated on
the date hereof, and Williams has agreed with Sterling Commerce to enter into a
consulting arrangement with Sterling Commerce on the date hereof; and

     WHEREAS, Williams and the Company agree that Williams' acceptance of the
consulting arrangement with Sterling Commerce will be in lieu of Williams
accepting the offer referred to under Section 7 of the CEO Agreement and that
the CEO Agreement should be amended in recognition of the foregoing to eliminate
Section 7 of the CEO Agreement and to eliminate the second sentence of Section 4
of the CEO Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and
valuable consideration, the Company and Williams hereby agree that the CEO
Agreement is amended on the date hereof by striking out Section 7 thereof in its
entirety and by striking out the second sentence of Section 4 thereof in its
entirety.

                                    STERLING SOFTWARE, INC.



                                    By:  /s/ Don J.McDermett, Jr.
                                         -----------------------------
                                         Don J. McDermett, Jr.
                                         Senior Vice President and
                                           General Counsel

                                         /s/ Sterling L. Williams
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    Sterling L. Williams
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           St. Patrick’s Day Drunk Driving Prevention Campaign      

# St. Patrick’s Day Drunk Driving Prevention Campaign

This webpage provides a collection of resources and facts about drunk driving prevention during this year’s St. Patrick’s Day celebrations. The page contains graphics, videos, fact sheets, social media messaging, and more. **Learn more.**
#### 552.237-71 Qualifications of Employees.

As prescribed in 537.110(a), insert the following clause:

# Qualifications of Employees (MAY 1989)

(a) The contracting officer or a designated representative may require the Contractor to remove any employee(s) from GSA controlled buildings or other real property should it be determined that the individual(s) is either unsuitable for security reasons or otherwise unfit to work on GSA controlled property.

(b) The Contractor shall fill out and cause all of its employees performing work on the contract work to fill out, for submission to the Government, such forms as may be necessary for security or other reasons. Upon request of the Contracting Officer, the Contractor and its employees shall be fingerprinted.

(c) Each employee of the Contractor shall be a citizen of the United States of America, or an alien who has been lawfully admitted for permanent residence as evidenced by Alien Registration Receipt Card Form I-151, or, who presents other evidence from the Immigration and Naturalization Service that employment will not affect his immigration status.

(End of clause)

[64 FR 37229, July 9, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 20606, May 5, 2009]
#### 552.270-9 Inspection—Right of Entry.

As prescribed in 570.703, insert the following clause:

# Inspection—Right of Entry (SEP 1999)

(a) At any time and from time to time after receipt of an offer (until the same has been duly withdrawn or rejected), after acceptance thereof and during the term, the agents, employees and contractors of the Government may, upon reasonable prior notice to Offeror or Lessor, enter upon the offered premises or the premises, and all other areas of the building access to which is necessary to accomplish the purposes of entry, to determine the potential or actual compliance by the Offeror or Lessor with the requirements of the solicitation or this lease, which purposes shall include, but not be limited to:

(1) Inspecting, sampling and analyzing suspected asbestos-containing materials and air monitoring for asbestos fibers;

(2) Inspecting the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system, maintenance records, and mechanical rooms for the offered premises or the premises;

(3) Inspecting for any leaks, spills, or other potentially hazardous conditions which may involve tenant exposure to hazardous or toxic substances; and

(4) Inspecting for any current or past hazardous waste operations, to ensure that appropriate mitigative actions were taken to alleviate any environmentally unsound activities in accordance with Federal, State and local law.

(b) Nothing in this clause shall be construed to create a Government duty to inspect for toxic materials or to impose a higher standard of care on the Government than on other lessees. The purpose of this clause is to promote the ease with which the Government may inspect the building. Nothing in this clause shall act to relieve the Lessor of any duty to inspect or liability which might arise as a result of Lessor's failure to inspect for or correct a hazardous condition.

(End of clause)

[64 FR 37229, July 9, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 30846, May 27, 2011]
228.106-7 Withholding contract payments. ( a ) Withholding may be appropriate in other than construction contracts (see FAR 32.112-1(b)).
[57 FR 42707, Sept. 16, 1992, as amended at 70 FR 8538, Feb. 22, 2005]