alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AIDAK 

% 

EAGL E E N T E R p R I S E 5 , uct 

ADAtC TELEPHONE UTILITY 

ADAK CABLEVISION 

WIND r CITy BROADBAND 

WINDY CITY CELLULAR 

^^cf^^o^^ - X^^o-^^'^<^ 

March 22, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary -

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Adak, Alaska, 

Docket DOT-OST-2000-8556 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines (or "Alaska") to continue to 

provide essential air service to the community of Adak, Alaska. 

Alaska's jet service is critically important to the economic well being of our community: (add here 

specifics regarding your view of the comparison of the two carrier bids). 

The 737-400 combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to 

continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet carrier simply 

cannot provide. Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with Required Navigation Performance 

Technology, which enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus 

reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach 

the community. Moreover, Alaska's service provides Adak passengers with the benefit of expedited and 

seamless on-line connections to most major cities in the "lower 48," via the airline's Anchorage hub. All 
of these jet service capabilities are critical to the success of the Adak community in maintaining and 

growing our economy. 

Alaska Airlines has a long history of air service throughout the state of Alaska and to the Adak 

community. We respectfully urge the Department to select Alaska Airlines to continue to provide 

essential air service to the Adak community. 

Sincerely, 

//"'^ Larry Mayes 

President/CEO 

cc: Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Parnell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Leo von Scheben, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 

The Honorable Don Young, U.S. Congressman 

The Honorable Lisa Murkowski, U.S. Senator 

The Honorable Mark Begich, U.S. Senator
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21020 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RUMALDO SOLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CR-272-14

-------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rumaldo Solis, federal prisoner #66932-079, appeals the denial of his F ED . R. C RIM . P. 12(b)(2) motion. He has also moved this court to dismiss his appeal without prejudice. Solis challenges the indictment on the bases that it failed to cite the statutes under which he was indicted, it omitted the time parameters during which the conspiracy was alleged to have occurred, and it did not explicitly state the amount of drugsNo. 01-21020 -2- with which he was charged. Jurisdiction did not lie in the district court under Rule 12(b)(2), however, because none of these allegations amounts to a claim that the indictment failed to charge an offense. Therefore, he was required to raise these alleged defects pretrial. See F ED . R. C RIM . P. 12(b)(2); United
States v. Freeman , 619 F.2d 1112, 1118 (5th Cir. 1980) (contention that the indictment lacked the specificity required by the Sixth Amendment was waived by failure to object before trial). Solis's motion to dismiss the indictment was thus unauthorized and without a jurisdictional basis. See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994) (noting that district court should have dismissed unauthorized postconviction motion for lack of jurisdiction). This appeal is without arguable merit and therefore dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1016

ROY L. EVANS,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(98-291-BLA)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy L. Evans, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Jennifer U.

Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1998). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See

Evans v. Director, OWCP, No. 98-291-BLA (BRB Nov. 5, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Program Authority

20 U.S.C. 1461 and 1481 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (**IDEA**). 

----

Applicable Regulations

      - The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. 
      - The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485.
      - The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474.
      - The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 304.

The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants except federally recognized Indian tribes. The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only.

----

EDGAR

Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR); 34 CFR 304
EXHIBIT 31.5 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ellen M. Cotter, certify that: 

|  | 1) |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Reading International, Inc.; and |
|--|----|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

﻿

|  | 2) |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

﻿

﻿

﻿

/s/ Ellen M. Cotter                              

Ellen M. Cotter

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) 

June 24, 2020

----
#### 52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms.

As prescribed in FAR 53.111, insert the following clause:

# Computer Generated Forms (JAN 1991)

(a) Any data required to be submitted on a Standard or Optional Form prescribed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) may be submitted on a computer generated version of the form, *provided* there is no change to the name, content, or sequence of the data elements on the form, and *provided* the form carries the Standard or Optional Form number and edition date.

(b) Unless prohibited by agency regulations, any data required to be submitted on an agency unique form prescribed by an agency supplement to the FAR may be submitted on a computer generated version of the form provided there is no change to the name, content, or sequence of the data elements on the form and provided the form carries the agency form number and edition date.

(c) If the Contractor submits a computer generated version of a form that is different than the required form, then the rights and obligations of the parties will be determined based on the content of the required form.

(End of clause)

[55 FR 52800, Dec. 21, 1990]
Exhibit 21.01
 NewBridge Bancorp
 Schedule of Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationNewBridge Bank (1)
    
    North CarolinaPeoples Finance Company of Lexington, Inc.(2)
    
    North CarolinaLSB Properties, Inc.(2)
    
    North CarolinaHenry Properties, LLC (3)
    
    North CarolinaPrince George Court Holdings, Inc.(3)
    
    South CarolinaFNB Financial Services Capital Trust I (4)
    
    Delaware
 
 (1)
    
    All banking offices in NC and VA do business under the name NewBridge
Bank.(2)
    
    Wholly owned subsidiary of NewBridge Bank.(3)
    
    Wholly owned subsidiary of LSB Properties, Inc..(4)
    
    In 2005, FNB formed a wholly owned Delaware statutory trust. All of the
common securities of the trust were owned by FNB, and were acquired by the Company upon the Merger. 97
#### 552.211-74 [Reserved]
#### Hugh McINTOSH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William WOODWARD and M. Hogan, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 74-3973.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 9, 1975.

Marc A. Rosenberg, Garden City, N.Y., for petitioner-appellant.

J. Robert Cooper, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for respondents-appellees.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges.

*96PER CURIAM:

McIntosh is incarcerated in the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary and on July 26, 1974 was notified that he would be paroled with the release date fixed for August 29, 1974. Presumably on the strong protests of the Joint Task Force on Organized Crime for the Eastern District of New York, the Board of Parole on August 23, 1974 informed McIntosh that a reconsideration would be held by the en banc Board. His counsel was permitted to make an oral statement to the en banc Board, but was then required to leave without participating further. Shortly afterward, the Board announced, with brief statement of its reasons, that McIntosh would not be paroled. McIntosh claims denial of due process procedural rights in the rescinding of the earlier order.

Sexton v. Wise, 5 Cir., 1974, 494 F.2d 1176 directly controls this case. McIntosh argues that the somewhat later Supreme Court opinion in Wolff v. McDonnell, 1974, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935, requires us to overrule *Sexton.*We disagree, and hold ourselves bound by the panel decision in *Sexton.*
      *1*

Affirmed.

. Upon oral argument, McIntosh’s counsel renewed application for bail pending appellate disposition of the case. In light of our action, the motion is denied.
50.205-4 Authorization of awards made presuming SAFETY Act designation or certification after contract award. ( a ) When necessary to award a contract prior to DHS issuing SAFETY Act protections, contracting officers may award contracts presuming that DHS will issue a SAFETY Act designation/certification to the contractor after contract award only if— ( 1 ) The criteria of 50.205-3(a) are met;
( 2 ) The chief of the contracting office (or other official designated in agency procedures) approves the action; and
( 3 ) The contracting officer advises DHS of the timelines for potential award and consults DHS as to when DHS could reasonably complete evaluations of offerors' applications for SAFETY Act designations or certifications.
( b ) Contracting officers shall not authorize offers presuming that SAFETY Act certification will be obtained (as opposed to a SAFETY Act designation), unless a block certification applies to the class of technology to be acquired under the solicitation.
[72 FR 63030, Nov. 7, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 2738, Jan. 15, 2009]
Exhibit 10.11.1

        AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JULY 19, 1994
         BETWEEN NAZARETH NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. AND REID L. HEEREN


     Reference is made to a Severance Agreement dated as of July 19, 1994 by and
between Nazareth  National Bank and Trust Co. and Reid L. Heeren (the "Severance
Agreement").  Section 1 of the Severance  Agreement  provides that the Severance
Agreement  will continue  until the earliest of certain dates set forth therein,
and clause (e) of Section 1 states as follows:

     "(e) three years from the date hereof."

     Clause (e) of Section 1 of the  Severance  Agreement  is hereby  amended to
read in full as follows:

     "(e) December 31, 2000."

     In all other respects the Severance  Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect. The parties intend to be legally bound hereby.


                                        NAZARETH NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO.

         (Corporate Seal)
                                        BY:       /s/ S. Eric Beattie
                                        ATTEST:   /s/ Judith S. Files

Witness:


/s/ Judith S. Files                     /s/ Reid L. Heeren              (Seal)
                                        REID L. HEEREN
#### 452.236-80 Firms Ineligible for Award—Construction.

As prescribed in 436.670, insert the following clause:

# Firms Ineligible for Award—Construction (NOV 1996)

The firm(s) and its subsidiaries or affiliates signatory to this contract shall be ineligible for award of any construction contract resulting from the design work performed under this contract.

(End of clause)
**Exhibit 31.3**
**Certifications**
I, Stephen M. Weinberg, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of 3333 Holding Corporation;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 10, 2003   /s/ STEPHEN M. WEINBERGStephen M. Weinberg  Chief Executive Officer
#### 425.1001 Waiver of right to examination of records.

The SPE shall make the determination under FAR 25.1001(a)(2)(iii).

[70 FR 48, Jan. 3, 2005]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Data Snapshot: Youth Victims of Suicide and Homicide      

# Resource: Data Snapshot: Youth Victims of Suicide and Homicide

This data snapshot (PDF, 1 page) details the characteristics and trends of youth victims of suicide and homicide in 2020. While the number of youth suicide victims changed little from 2019 to 2020, the number of youth homicide victims increased 47 percent.**Learn more** (PDF, 1 page).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                             20,906
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   20,906
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     20,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              19,500
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           52,336
<OTHER-SE>                                        (50,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       20,906
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   45,000
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   20,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    20,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       20,906
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .004



</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) Heritage Month Fun Facts      

# Resource: American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) Heritage Month Fun Facts

This webpage contains a fact sheet (PDF, 1 page) and a corresponding teaching guide (PDF, 2 pages) about American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) Heritage Month. Educators can use the materials to teach students about the observance and share statistics on demographic characteristics such as average age, educational attainment, population size, and largest Tribal groupings to date. The teaching guide provides discussion prompts and activity ideas. **Learn more.**