alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Honorable Jean Rodgers

County Attorney Hardeman County Quanah, Texas
Dear Sir: OpinionNumber O-2555 Re: Can a school district lawfully issue bonds to repair the present school building and to takeup and discharge thewarrants outstanding thatwere given in payment of the supplies and equipment as set forth, all of which vouchers are now past due?
We are in receipt of your opinion request of recent date, and quote fromyour letter as follows:

"I have been asked by the County Superintendent of Hardeman County to submit to you the following, reference to issuance of bonds by the King Common Consolidated School District. "Beginning in the school year of 1931-32 this school districthad,an unpaid account for equipment in the sum of $105.00. "During the schoolyear of 1933-34 the districthad an unpaid account for school equipment of $1586.00.
"For the schoolyear of 1934-35 therewere unpaid accounts for school equiprhent and supplies such as paint, lumberlandthe like in the sum of $1017.00.
"For the schoolyear of 1935-36 therewas an unpaid balance for seats, typewriters,radiators in the sum of $1234.22.
"The school iear of 1937-38 therewas an unpaid balance of 69.45which was for lumber and other like supplies. In the same year of 19X8-39 therewas an unpaid balance of $8.20.
"As each of these accountswere created theHonorable gean Rodgers, page 2

school districtwould issue to the party or the corporationa school voucher payable out bf l3aecurrent funds for the year inwhich theywere issued. There are not sufficient taxes paid to take up the vouchers as they mature and there are not sufficientdelinquent taxes unpaid to take up the vouchers for the respectiveyears for which theywere issued.
"The school districtneeds to do some repairs on the,schoolbuilding and would like to pay all of the back debts out of a bond issue,~~.Please

adviseme the following:
"Can a school district lawfully issue bonds to repair the present school building and to takeup and discharge thewarrants outstanding thatwere given in payment of the supplies and equipment as stated above, all of ,whichvouchers are now past due, some of them as you will notice are past due for a good many years?"
It is the opinion of this department that a school districtmay lawfully issuebonds to repair the present school building under the authority of Article 2784 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, which provides, in part, that silch bondsmay be issued "for the purchase, construction,reuair or equipment of public free school buildingswithin the limits of such district, and the purchase of the necessary sites therefor." However, this departmenthas held in Opinion Number 0-846, a copy of which is enclosed, that bonds cannot be issued by a school district for the purpose of paying past due obligations.

Trusting that this answersyour question,we are
Yours very truly
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

BY Claud 0. Boothman

Assistant COB:s APPROVED Aug.9, 1940 Grover SellersFirst Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: Opinion Committeeby BWB, Chairman
Exhibit 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Miguel C. Soto , Chief Financial Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
          ended June 30, 2004 ("Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

     2.   All of the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
          of operations of the company.



Date: August 13, 2004                       /x/ Miguel C Soto
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                Miguel C. Soto
                                                Chief Financial Officer
39.102 Management of risk. ( a ) Prior to entering into a contract for information technology, an agency should analyze risks, benefits, and costs. (See part 7 for additional information regarding requirements definition.) Reasonable risk taking is appropriate as long as risks are controlled and mitigated. Contracting and program office officials are jointly responsible for assessing, monitoring and controlling risk when selecting projects for investment and during program implementation.
( b ) Types of risk may include schedule risk, risk of technical obsolescence, cost risk, risk implicit in a particular contract type, technical feasibility, dependencies between a new project and other projects or systems, the number of simultaneous high risk projects to be monitored, funding availability, and program management risk.
( c ) Appropriate techniques should be applied to manage and mitigate risk during the acquisition of information technology. Techniques include, but are not limited to: prudent project management; use of modular contracting; thorough acquisition planning tied to budget planning by the program, finance and contracting offices; continuous collection and evaluation of risk-based assessment data; prototyping prior to implementation; post implementation reviews to determine actual project cost, benefits and returns; and focusing on risks and returns using quantifiable measures.
|                                                                        |  |             
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |  | Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) by National Mercantile Bancorp (Registrant), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 12, 2007

/s/ C. G.
Kum

C. G. Kum

President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Romolo
Santarosa

Romolo Santarosa

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017213EN.01000101.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 213/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 202, 26.6.2017.

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.

OJ C 178, 6.6.2017.

OJ C 168, 29.5.2017.

OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.

OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,844
<INVENTORY>                                      1,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,847
<PP&E>                                       1,921,094
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,036,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,085,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          301,537
<BONDS>                                        164,320
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,968
<OTHER-SE>                                     230,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,085,047
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,652
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,923
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 201 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 201

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Registry of Nonbank Covered Persons 
             Subject to Certain Agency and Court Orders''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 30, 2024

Mr. Ogles submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Registry of Nonbank Covered Persons 
             Subject to Certain Agency and Court Orders''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Registry of Nonbank Covered Persons Subject to Certain Agency and 
Court Orders'' (89 Fed. Reg. 56028; published July 8, 2024) and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
32.302 Authority. Congress has authorized Federal Reserve Banks to act, on behalf of guaranteeing agencies, as fiscal agents of the United States in the making of loan guarantees for defense production (Section 301, Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2091)). By Executive Order 10480, August 14, 1953 (3 CFR 1949-53), as amended, the President has designated the following agencies as guaranteeing agencies: ( a ) Department of Defense.
( b ) Department of Energy.
( c ) Department of Commerce.
( d ) Department of the Interior.
( e ) Department of Agriculture.
( f ) General Services Administration.
( g ) National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**Who May Apply: (by category)**:  Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs)

Institutional Service Home

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
49.401 General. ( a ) Termination for default is generally the exercise of the Government's contractual right to completely or partially terminate a contract because of the contractor's actual or anticipated failure to perform its contractual obligations.
( b ) If the contractor can establish, or it is otherwise determined that the contractor was not in default or that the failure to perform is excusable; i.e., arose out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor, the default clauses prescribed in 49.503 and located at 52.249 provide that a termination for default will be considered to have been a termination for the convenience of the Government, and the rights and obligations of the parties governed accordingly.
( c ) The Government may, in appropriate cases, exercise termination or cancellation rights in addition to those in the contract clauses (see for example, paragraph (h) of the Default clause at 52.249-8).
( d ) For default terminations of orders under Federal Supply Schedule contracts, see subpart 8.4.
( e ) Notwithstanding the provisions of this 49.401, the contracting officer may, with the written consent of the contractor, reinstate the terminated contract by amending the notice of termination, after a written determination is made that the supplies or services are still required and reinstatement is advantageous to the Government.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Peace Corps

# AGENCY:

Peace Corps.

# ACTION:

Notice; reopening of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Peace Corps published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 8, 2020, concerning request for comments on an information collection request submission for OMB Review. The purpose of this notice is to reopen the document comment period.                    

# DATES:

The comment period for the notice published December 8, 2020, at 85 FR 79046, is reopened. Submit comments on or before March 19, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Address written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection to Virginia Burke, FOIA/Privacy Act Officer, by email at                         *pcfr@peacecorps.gov.*                         Email comments must be made in text and not in attachments.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Virginia Burke, 202-692-1887.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In FR Doc. 2020-26879, published at 85 FR 79046 on December 8, 2020, the notice gave a 30-day comment period that closed on January 7, 2021, but the comment period should have been 60 days. The Peace Corps is reopening the comment period to provide an additional 30 days of comments.

This notice is issued in Washington, DC, on February 10, 2021.

Virginia Burke,

FOIA/Privacy Act Officer, Management.

[FR Doc. 2021-03074 Filed 2-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6051-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PEACE CORPS


Information Collection Request Submission for OMB Review; 
Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Peace Corps.

ACTION: Notice; reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Peace Corps published a document in the Federal Register 
of December 7, 2020, concerning request for comments on an information 
collection request submission for OMB Review. The purpose of this 
notice is to reopen the document comment period.

DATES: The comment period for the notice published December 7, 2020, at 
85 FR 78886, is reopened. Submit comments on or before March 19, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Address written comments and recommendations for the 
proposed information collection to Virginia Burke, FOIA/Privacy Act 
Officer, by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e2e3d382c1e2e3b3f3d3b3d312c2e2d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1363707561536376727076707c6163603d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>. Email comments must be made 
in text and not in attachments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virginia Burke, 202-692-1887.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2020-26808, published at 85 FR 
78886 on December 7, 2020, the notice gave a 30-day comment period that 
closed on January 6, 2021, but the comment period should have been 60 
days. The Peace Corps is reopening the comment period to provide an 
additional 30 days of comments.

    This notice is issued in Washington, DC, on February 9, 2021.
Virginia Burke,
FOIA/Privacy Act Officer, Management.
[FR Doc. 2021-03079 Filed 2-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6051-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
32.804 Extent of assignee's protection. ( a ) No payments made by the Government to the assignee under any contract assigned in accordance with the Act may be recovered on account of any liability of the contractor to the Government. This immunity of the assignee is effective whether the contractor's liability arises from or independently of the assigned contract.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) below, the inclusion of a no-setoff commitment in an assigned contract entitles the assignee to receive contract payments free of reduction or setoff for— ( 1 ) Any liability of the contractor to the Government arising independently of the contract; and
( 2 ) Any of the following liabilities of the contractor to the Government arising from the assigned contract: ( i ) Renegotiation under any statute or contract clause.
( ii ) Fines.
( iii ) Penalties, exclusive of amounts that may be collected or witheld from the contractor under, or for failure to comply with, the terms of the contract.
( iv ) Taxes or social security contributions.
( v ) Withholding or nonwithholding of taxes or social security contributions.
( c ) In some circumstances, a setoff may be appropriate even though the assigned contract includes a no-setoff commitment, e.g.— ( 1 ) When the assignee has neither made a loan under the assignment nor made a commitment to do so; or
( 2 ) To the extent that the amount due on the contract exceeds the amount of any loans made or expected to be made under a firm commitment for financing.