alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.4**
**Certifications**
I, Todd D. Newman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of 3333 Holding Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: February 9, 2004   /s/ TODD D. NEWMANTodd D. Newman  Chief Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: School-Level Practices to Increase Availability of Fruits, Vegetables, and Whole Grains, and Reduce Sodium in School Meals — United States, 2000, 2006, and 2014      

# Report: School-Level Practices to Increase Availability of Fruits, Vegetables, and Whole Grains, and Reduce Sodium in School Meals — United States, 2000, 2006, and 2014

CDC researchers analyzed school-level implementation of the Department of Agriculture’s school nutrition standards, specifically on practices related to fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and sodium. Results show almost all schools offer whole grain foods, vegetables, and fruits during the school day, and the percentage of schools making efforts to increase the availability of these foods and decrease sodium increased from 2000 to 2014. **Learn more.**
32.409-2 Recommendation for disapproval. If recommending disapproval, the contracting officer shall, under agency procedures, transmit— ( a ) The items prescribed in 32.409-1(a), (b), and (c); and
( b ) The recommendation for disapproval and the reasons.
July 3, 2014

Mr. Ray Heyde

Vice President, General Manager

US Aviation Group LLC, dba US Aviation Academy

4850 Spartan Drive

Denton, TX 76207

Dear: Mr. Heyde

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it.

We Have the Petition

We have received your May 21, 2014 petition on behalf of US Aviation Group LLC, dba U.S.

Aviation Academy, for an exemption from § 61.35(a)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). The exemption, if granted, would allow Chinese national citizens 

enrolled in U.S. Aviation Academy’s part 141 program to apply for the FAA written 

knowledge test for the Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) part 121, after completing both the 

approved ATP and CRM/Turbine Transition course without meeting the flight simulation 

training device (FSTD), requirements of §§ 61.35(a)(2) and 61.156(b).

We have added your petition to the public docket No. FAA-2014-0387 and we are processing 

it. We will contact you if we need additional information.

How We Will Process the Petition

A petition for an exemption, according to § 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 

§ 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it.
2

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-4713.

Sincerely,

/s/

Alphonso W. Pendergrass II

Transportation Industry Analyst

Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
#### Stephano COLOSI, Jr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 07-6281.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2007.

Decided: Nov. 6, 2007.

*272David Bernard Hargett, Hargett & Watson, PLC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellant. Alice T. Armstrong, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephano Colosi, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Colosi has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### The People of the State of New York v. Joseph Scarola.

Order of this court entered on October 5, 1961, assigning Bernard Newman, Esq., as counsel for the defendant-appellant, is vacated, and Frederick H. Block, Esq., of 50 Broad Street, New York, N. Y., is assigned as counsel for defendant-appellant in the place and stead of Bernard Newman, Esq. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Andrew J. Fromkin, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Clinical Data, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructionscontained in SEC Release 34-47986]  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: June 28, 2006 /s/ Andrew J. Fromkin       Andrew J. Fromkin President and Chief Executive Officer
4.1803 Verifying CAGE codes prior to award. ( a ) Contracting officers shall verify the offeror's CAGE code by reviewing the entity's registration in the System for Award Management (SAM). Active registrations in SAM have had the associated CAGE codes verified.
( b ) For entities not required to be registered in SAM, the contracting officer shall validate the CAGE code using the CAGE code search feature at *https://cage.dla.mil .*
[79 FR 31190, May 30, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 45867, July 14, 2016]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Data Set      

# Resource: 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Data Set

The 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data set is now publicly available. The BRFSS survey collected information on health risk behaviors, clinical preventive health practices, and health care access (primarily related to chronic disease and injury) of young adults and adults across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. It is the largest ongoing telephone-based health surveillance system in the world. **Learn more.**
2434.003 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Senior Procurement Executive is responsible for establishing written procedures for implementation of A-109. Such procedures have been set out in internal Departmental directives.
[53 FR 46537, Nov. 17, 1988]
# C_2018132EN.01000501.xml

| 13.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 April 2018

(2018/C 132/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2323 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4451 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86745 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3723 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1876 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5973 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,316 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,40 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1844 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6615 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,0473 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5893 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5517 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6734 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6700 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6155 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 319,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,7838 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7452 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4213 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 968,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7770 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,102 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,8954 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,448 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1482 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,3815 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,4170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2323

JPY

Japanese yen

132,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4451

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86745

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3723

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1876

ISK

Iceland króna

122,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5973

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,316

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,40

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1844

RON

Romanian leu

4,6615

TRY

Turkish lira

5,0473

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5893

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5517

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6734

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6700

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6155

KRW

South Korean won

1 319,86

ZAR

South African rand

14,7838

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7452

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4213

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 968,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7770

PHP

Philippine peso

64,102

RUB

Russian rouble

75,8954

THB

Thai baht

38,448

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1482

MXN

Mexican peso

22,3815

INR

Indian rupee

80,4170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 252.243-7001 Pricing of contract modifications.

As prescribed in 243.205-70, use the following clause:

# Pricing of Contract Modifications (DEC 1991)

When costs are a factor in any price adjustment under this contract, the contract cost principles and procedures in FAR part 31 and DFARS part 231, in effect on the date of this contract, apply.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 66 FR 49865, Oct. 1, 2001]
----

 

Cleco Power LLC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ClecoPower LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, David M. Eppler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

/s/David M.Eppler                               

David M. Eppler

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

 

----

 

**EXHIBIT 32(b)**

** **

Cleco Power LLC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ClecoPower LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Dilek Samil, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

/s/DilekSamil                               

Dilek SamilChief Financial Officerand Senior Vice President of Finance

 

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This  certification  is  intended  to  accompany  the Annual  Report of
Commerce  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-K for the  period  ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the  "Report"),  and is given solely for the purpose of  satisfying
the  requirements of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned,  in my capacity as set forth
below, hereby certifies that:

1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

       /s/ Douglas J. Pauls                  Date:  March 28, 2003
       -----------------------               ---------------------
       Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ollie M. Williams, Respondent, v 21st Century Restaurant Company et al., Appellants, and Servair, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 29, 1976. It is undisputed that the claimant sustained compensable injuries to her head and face on June 13, 1974; to her head, neck and back on September 20, 1974, and to her head and shoulders on October 23, 1974. Further, it is undisputed that the claimant is totally disabled as the result of at least two of these accidental happenings. The sole issue upon this appeal is whether or not the record contains substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that the claimant is disabled as the result of *all*these accidents. In particular, since appellant is only aggrieved by the finding of causal connection with the accident of June 13, 1974, the question here is whether or not there is any substantial evidence supporting a contrary causal connection as to the June 13 accident. On July 29, 1974, the claimant’s attending physician reported that she was suffering a postconcussion syndrome as the result of her June accident. On July 11, 1975, a Dr. Blackwell reported that claimant was still suffering from a postcerebral concussion syndrome but, curiously, reasoned that it did not contribute to her total disability. Finally, a board physician, Dr. Harrow, testified on September 4, 1975 that the injuries were "one superimposed upon the other”, and there was "a cumulative end result in a condition that had very little time to even heal”. The foregoing review of the evidence in this case demonstrates that this appeal has no merit and that there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the finding of a common causal connection to the claimant’s disability. Decision affirmed, with costs to each of the respondents filing briefs against the appellants. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.