alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>0000018734
<NAME>  CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>	                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>					6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>				DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>					JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>					PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>			3,246,175
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>			   42,765
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>				  201,913
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>		 	   26,985
<OTHER-ASSETS>					1,275,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>					4,792,839
<COMMON>					  168,888
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>			  405,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>				  756,465
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>			1,330,353
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>				        0
<PREFERRED>					    5,967
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>				1,254,554
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>				  253,779
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>			  350,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>				0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>				0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>				0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>				0
<LEASES-CURRENT>					0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>		 	1,598,186
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>			4,792,839
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>			  754,239
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>				   42,441
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>			  577,431
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>		  	  619,872
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>				  134,367
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>				    2,362
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>			  136,729
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>			   61,037
<NET-INCOME>					   75,692
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>			      121
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>		 	   75,571
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>			   78,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>			   37,354
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>				  184,887
<EPS-BASIC>					     0.00<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>	 			   	     0.00<F1>
<FN>
<F1> ALL COMMON STOCK OWNED BY PARENT COMPANY; NO EPS REQUIRED
</FN>


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This  certification  is  intended  to  accompany  the Annual  Report of
Commerce  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-K for the  period  ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the  "Report"),  and is given solely for the purpose of  satisfying
the  requirements of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned,  in my capacity as set forth
below, hereby certifies that:

1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Vernon W. Hill                           Date: March 28, 2003
------------------------                     ------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
AMCORE FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
EXHIBIT 11
STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS 


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        For the Years Ended, 
(in 000's)                                            1995      1994      1993
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>       <C>      <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
 EARNINGS 
  Income applicable to common stock                  $18,271   $21,801  $21,440
 SHARES
  Weighted average number of common shares            14,083    14,023   13,972

  Dilutive effect of outstanding options (as  
  determined by application of the treasury   
  stock method)                                          224       196      153
                                                     -------   -------  -------
  Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted      14,307    14,219   14,125
                                                     =======   =======  =======

 PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE*                         $ 1.277   $ 1.533  $ 1.518
                                                     =======   =======  =======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
 EARNINGS 
  Income applicable to common stock                  $18,271   $21,801  $21,440

SHARES
 Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted       
  per primary computation above                       14,307    14,219   14,125

 Additional dilutive effect of outstanding options    
  (as determined by application of the treasury     
  stock method)                                           --        --       62
                                                     -------   -------  -------
 
 Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted       14,307    14,219   14,187
                                                     =======   =======  =======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE*                    $ 1.277    $ 1.533 $ 1.511
                                                     =======   =======  =======

</TABLE>

*  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item
   601(b)(11) although not required footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB Opinion
   No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
#### 2452.216-73 Performance evaluation plan.

As prescribed in 2416.406(e)(3), insert the following clause in all award fee contracts:

# Performance Evaluation Plan (AUG 1987)

(a) The Government shall unilaterally establish a Performance Evaluation Plan that will provide the basis for the determination of the amount of award fee awarded under the contract. The Plan shall set forth evaluation criteria and percentage of award fee available for (1) technical functions, including schedule requirements if appropriate, (2) management functions; and, (3) cost functions. The Government shall furnish a copy of the Plan to the Contractor (*insert number*) days before the start of the first evaluation period.

(b) The Government may unilaterally change the award fee plan prior to the beginning of subsequent evaluation periods. The Contracting Officer will provide such changes in writing to the Contractor prior to the beginning of the applicable evaluation period.

(End of clause)

[53 FR 46538, Nov. 17, 1988, as amended at 64 FR 46098, Aug. 23, 1999; 71 FR 2438, Jan. 13, 2006]
501.105-2 Arrangement of regulations. ( a ) The GSAR numbers and captions policies and procedures to correspond to how they appear in the FAR, e.g., 1.104 in the FAR is 501.104 in the GSAR.
( b ) GSAR rules not implementing the FAR have numbers beginning with 70, e.g., part 570, subsection 515.209-70.
( c ) The GSAR may have gaps in its numbering scheme because a FAR rule may not require GSAR implementation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                        33
<INVENTORY>                                      8,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,344
<PP&E>                                          28,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,732
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,944
<SALES>                                         13,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,636
<CGS>                                           10,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (74)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       449
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

[NARA-2021-017]


National Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee 
(NISPPAC) Meeting

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), National Archives 
and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing an upcoming meeting of the National 
Industrial Security Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC).

DATES: The meeting will be on April 14, 2021, from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 
p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: The April 14, 2021, meeting will be a virtual meeting. See 
supplementary procedures below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Harris Pag[aacute]n, ISOO 
Program Analyst, by telephone at 202.357.5351, or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afe1e6fcffffeeecefc1ceddce81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88c6c1dbd8d8c9cbc8e6e9fae9a6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and 
implementing regulations at 41 CFR 101-6. The Committee will discuss 
National Industrial Security Program policy matters.
    Procedures: You must register in advance through the Event Services 
link https://ems8.intellor.com?do=register&t=1&p=836856 if you wish to 
attend. NISPPAC members, ISOO employees, and speakers should send an 
email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dc92958f8c8c9d9f9cb2bdaebdf2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8f6f1ebe8e8f9fbf8d6d9cad996dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a> for the appropriate registration information 
instead of registering with the above link. Contact us via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aae4e3f9fafaebe9eac4cbd8cb84cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fc1c6dcdfdfcecccfe1eefdeea1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a> with any questions.

Brian P. McLaughlin,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-03002 Filed 2-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

# Panel Review by Applicant

## California

Bottom of Form

# _1479584968.unknown
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications**I, Timothy R. Eller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Centex Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] andinternal control over financial reporting [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)] for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: July 31, 2007/s/ TIMOTHY R. ELLER
#### 401.104 Applicability.

The FAR and AGAR apply to all USDA acquisitions of supplies and services (including construction) which obligate appropriated funds, unless otherwise specified in this chapter or excepted by law.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.6

CENTEX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 3333 Holding Corporation and
Subsidiary and Centex Development Company, L.P. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-Q
for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd D. Newman, Chief
Financial Officer of 3333 Development Corporation, the general partner of
Centex Development Company, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Centex
Development Company, L.P. and Subsidiaries.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ TODD D. NEWMAN     
| |                        
| | Todd D. Newman         
| | Chief Financial Officer
|
| | Date: November 10, 2003
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for ArkansasReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for ArkansasReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for ArkansasReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479577932.unknown

# _1479577933.unknown

# _1479577931.unknown
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sophie Jagodzinski, Respondent, v. George Crean Provision Co. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Aulisi, J.

The employer and its insurance carrier appeal from an award for reduced earnings, the sole issue being as to rate. *836The compensation claim was not controverted and carrier paid awards in full for claimant’s disability up to September 13, 1961. The controversy involved on this appeal concerns the amount of the award for the partial disability continuing after September 13, 1961. The Referee inserted in his original decision a 25% disability;. but crossed that figure out, substituting the flat award of $12 per week. In affirming, the board stated: *“*considering the nature of the injuries and claimant’s physical impairment, the reduced earnings rate of $12 subsequent to September 13, 1961, reasonably represents claimant’s earning capacity.” Since claimant’s average weekly wage before the accident was $27, the $12 award indicates a partial disability of 66%% computed according to the formula set forth in subdivision 5 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The evidence most favorable to claimant was of a 30% disability. Relying on *Matter of Blum*v. *Jo-Mar Sportswear Co.*(19 A D 2d 440), claimant urges that the board’s determination here must be sustained. In *Blum*as appears from the record on appeal, there was medical evidence of “ considerable ” disability and some indication, indeed, of total disability, which warranted the board’s disregarding the 25% set by the Referee; while here the record demonstrates not only the 30% disability which has been alluded to, but repeated references to “mild" or “very mild” partial disability. Although a minimum of a $20 rate is set, in no event shall compensation when combined with earning capacity exceed the amount of wages being received at the time of injury. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 6, par. [b].) Thus, in *Matter of Maliszewski*v. *New York Tel. Co.*(8 A D 2d 676) we reversed because the then minimum when combined with the earning capacity exceeded the preaccident wage rate. Decision reversed, with costs to appellants against .the Workmen’s Compensation Board, and matter remitted for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Hamm, ,JJ., concur.
# C_2018032EN.01000101.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 032/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 22, 22.1.2018

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 13, 15.1.2018

OJ C 5, 8.1.2018

OJ C 437, 18.12.2017

OJ C 424, 11.12.2017

OJ C 412, 4.12.2017

OJ C 402, 27.11.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 3001.303 Publication and codification.

(a) The HSAR is issued as chapter 30 of Title 48 of the CFR.

(1) The FAR numbering illustrations at (FAR) 48 CFR 1.105-2 apply to the HSAR.

(2) Coverage within HSAR 48 CFR chapter 30 is identified by the prefix “30” followed by the complete FAR cite which may extend downward to the subparagraph level (e.g., (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.101).

(3) Coverage in HSAR chapter 30 that supplements the FAR will use part, subpart, section, and subsection numbers ending in “70” through “89”. A series of numbers beginning with “70” is used for provisions and clauses (e.g., (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.301-70).

(4) Coverage in HSAR 48 CFR chapter 30, other than that identified with a “70” or higher number, which implements the FAR uses the identical number sequence and caption of the FAR segment being implemented which may extend downward to the subparagraph level. Subparagraph numbers/letters may not be shown as sequential, but may be shown by the specific paragraph/subparagraph implemented from the FAR (e.g., (HSAR) 48 CFR 3003.301 contains subparagraphs (a) and (b) because only these subparagraphs, correlating to FAR, are being supplemented by (HSAR) 48 CFR chapter 30).

(5) *Component-unique guidance.* Supplementary material for which there is no counterpart in the FAR or HSAR shall be identified using chapter, part, subpart, section, or subsection numbers of “90” and up (e.g., the U.S. Coast Guard's acronym is “USCG”; an USCG-unique clause pertaining to “Inspection and/or Acceptance” would be designated “USCG 3052.246-90”).

(6) References and citations. Cross references to the FAR in the HSAR will be cited by “FAR” followed by the FAR numbered cite, and cross reference to the HSAM in the HSAR will be cited by “HSAM” followed by the HSAM numbered cite.

(7) Department/agency and Component supplements must parallel the FAR and HSAR numbering, except department/agency supplemental numbering uses subsection numbering of 90 and up, instead of 70 and up.

| FAR | Is implemented as | Is supplemented as |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 19 | 3019 | 3019.70 |
| 19.5 | 3019.5 | 3019.570 |
| 19.501 | 3019.501 | 3019.501-70 |
| 19.501-1 | 3019.501-1 | 3019.501-170 |

Table 1-1—HSAR Numbering

[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 48800, Aug. 22, 2006; 77 FR 50632, Aug. 22, 2012]