alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1199

MATTHEW A. BARRETO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. AFFLUENCE EDU; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 02845

- JKB )

Submitted : April 26, 2021 Decided: May 18, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.

Matthew A. Barreto , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Matthew A. Barreto seeks to appeal the district cou rt ’ s order dismissing his civil complaint and the district court’s subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration and motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal or to reopen the appeal period

. We previously remanded to the district c ourt with instructions for the district court to
determine whether Barreto can satisfy the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The
district court found , without affording the parties an opportunity to submit pleadings or evidence, that Barreto failed to demonstrate that he did not receive notice of the court’s order and that Defendants would suffer prejudice if the court reopened the appeal period. Accordingly, the district court denied the motion to reopen the appeal period.
Because Barreto’s filing s suggest that he did not receive notice of the district court’s
dismissal order within at least the first month after it was entered on the district court’s docket, we again remand for a determination as to whether Barreto is entitled to a reopening
of th e appeal period. On remand, the district court shall afford the parties an opportunity to submit additional information to assist it in determining whether Barreto is entitled to a reopening of the appeal period . The record, as supplemented, will be returned to this court
for further consideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
dec isional process.
REMANDED
#### 27.203 Security requirements for patent applications containing classified subject matter.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Experimentalengineering-geologic and environmental-geologic maps of the conterminous UnitedStates**
 
Report | Plates: 0102030405
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1610
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000963534
 
October 4, 2018
43.102 Policy. ( a ) Only contracting officers acting within the scope of their authority are empowered to execute contract modifications on behalf of the Government. Other Government personnel shall not— ( 1 ) Execute contract modifications;
( 2 ) Act in such a manner as to cause the contractor to believe that they have authority to bind the Government; or
( 3 ) Direct or encourage the contractor to perform work that should be the subject of a contract modification.
( b ) Contract modifications, including changes that could be issued unilaterally, shall be priced before their execution if this can be done without adversely affecting the interest of the Government. If a significant cost increase could result from a contract modification and time does not permit negotiation of a price, at least a ceiling price shall be negotiated unless impractical.
[48 FR 42386, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 18915, Apr. 29, 1996; 61 FR 69298, Dec. 31, 1996; 74 FR 28431, June 15, 2009; 79 FR 24213, Apr. 29, 2014]
|   | 1. | The Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          |   |                         |   |
|---------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|          |   | /s/ Henry P. Herms           |   |
|          |   | Henry P. Herms               |   |
|          |   | Vice President - Finance and |   |
| June 29, 2010 |   | Chief Financial Officer      |   |
AP P E N DIX H : CAC B O UNDARI E SC l ean A i r C o rr i d o r E nd o rsed b y t h e WR A P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Able Home Health, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04089

Honorable John W. Darrah

Access Intelligence, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, July 17, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable John W. Darrah: The Court's 7/17/12 order is

amended to reflect that this case is dismissed without prejudice as to the class claims and

with prejudice as to the individual claims. Mailed notice(maf)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04089 Document #: 20 Filed: 07/17/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:71
Editorial Note on Subpart 408.7 of Part 408
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 408.7 of part 408 appear at 70 FR 45, Jan. 3, 2005.

408.705 Procedures. ( a ) The organization head shall appoint one person as Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (JWOD) Liaison to represent the organization and to coordinate the organization's actions with the Committee Member.
( b ) JWOD advocates may represent more than one organization. Liaisons need not be acquisition officials.
( c ) The organization head shall issue and maintain a performance plan to promote and enhance the organization's acquisitions from JWOD participating nonprofit agencies.
( d ) The performance plan shall: ( 1 ) Announce the organization's support for the JWOD Act;
( 2 ) Establish a promotion program for the products and services provided by the JWOD participating nonprofit agencies;
( 3 ) Provide for the JWOD Liaison's role in acquisition planning;
( 4 ) Establish measurable program goals for growth or other accomplishment in the organization's JWOD program actions; and
( 5 ) Establish an awards program for successful participation in the JWOD program.
[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996, as amended at 70 FR 45, Jan. 3, 2005]
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN:_ SE01295A08

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
<PAGE>                                              Exhibit 10.16





                                 February 6, 1996





Mr. Lawrence M. Nagin
3508 Reservoir Road, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20007

Dear Larry:

     This letter confirms that in connection with the Employment
Agreement dated as of February 6, 1996 between USAir, Inc. (the
"Company") and you, the Company has agreed to provide you with
the additional benefits described herein.

     The Company will provide you with relocation assistance in
the form of (1) payment of the remaining obligations under your
lease in Chicago, (2) reimbursement for reasonable living
expenses for living accommodations near the Company's
headquarters, and (3) reimbursement for moving household goods
and reasonable storage.  You will also receive other relocation
assistance in accordance with the Company's Executive Relocation
and Housing Assistance Guidelines. Payments for such relocation
assistance will be "grossed up" for all applicable tax liability. 
Any such "gross up" payments will be made as soon as practicable,
but not later than September 30, 1996.

     While employed by the Company, you will be reimbursed for
reasonable expenses incurred for tax return preparation up to an
annual maximum of $10,000.

     Reimbursement will be made as expenses are incurred upon
your submission of appropriate documentation.

     In the event USAir Group, Inc. ("Group") for any reason is
unable to award you the stock options described in our February
5, 1996 letter agreement, Group and/or the Company will award you
a substitute award, reasonably acceptable to you, with value and
terms substantially identical to the value and terms such options
would have had.




                               1

<PAGE>
Mr. Lawrence M. Nagin
February 6, 1996




     Please indicate with your signature below if the foregoing
accurately sets forth our agreement on the subject matter hereof.


                              Sincerely yours,

                              /s/Michelle V. Bryan

                              Michelle V. Bryan
                              Vice President, Deputy             
                               General Counsel and               
                                 Secretary



Agreed:


/s/Lawrence M. Nagin
________________________
   Lawrence M. Nagin
























                               2
#### Antonio GRAHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Timothy HATCH, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-2246.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 17, 2008.

Antonio Graham, Santa Rosa, NM, pro se.

Patricia A. Gandert, Santa Fe, NM, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before O’BRIEN, McKAY, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER*

MONROE G. McKAY, Circuit Judge.

Pro se Petitioner Antonio Graham, a New Mexico State inmate, seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Petitioner was convicted on multiple drug-related charges and was sentenced to just under forty years’ imprisonment. After pursuing the state appeals process, Petitioner filed the instant petition in federal court asserting multiple claims, all of which the district court denied on the merits based on the magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations.

*851Petitioner must obtain a certificate of appealability to challenge the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. *See Montez v. McKinna,*208 F.3d 862, 867 (10th Cir.2000). To obtain a certificate of appealability, Petitioner must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). To meet this burden, Petitioner must demonstrate “that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted).

In his brief to this court, Petitioner does not make a substantial showing that he was denied his constitutional rights. He merely reiterates the arguments he made in the state courts and at the federal district court level, which were correctly rejected for the reasons stated by those courts.

We conclude the district court correctly denied Petitioner’s habeas petition. Nothing in Petitioner’s arguments convinces us he has met our standard for issuing a certificate of appealability. For substantially the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s report and adopted by the district court, we DENY Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability and DISMISS the appeal.

*

 This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2017      

# Report: America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2017

This report, which marks the 20th release of this flagship publication, provides the most recent statistics on children and families in the U.S. across 41 key indicators covering a range of domains, including family and social environment, economic circumstances, health care, physical environment and safety, behavior, education, and health. **Learn more.**
# C_2019349EN.01000401.xml

| 15.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

14 October 2019

(2019/C 349/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1031 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4689 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87983 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8523 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0983 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0463 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,823 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 331,44 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2931 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7546 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5424 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6325 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4576 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6529 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7529 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5103 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 307,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,3283 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7988 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4315 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 586,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6198 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,899 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,8543 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,529 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5395 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2983 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,5245 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1031

JPY

Japanese yen

119,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4689

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87983

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8523

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0983

ISK

Iceland króna

138,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0463

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,823

HUF

Hungarian forint

331,44

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2931

RON

Romanian leu

4,7546

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5424

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6325

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4576

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6529

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7529

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5103

KRW

South Korean won

1 307,06

ZAR

South African rand

16,3283

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7988

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4315

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 586,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6198

PHP

Philippine peso

56,899

RUB

Russian rouble

70,8543

THB

Thai baht

33,529

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5395

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2983

INR

Indian rupee

78,5245

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

Montana Office of Public InstructionP.O. Box 202501Helena, MT 59620-2501Phone: (406) 444-3680Website: http://www.opi.mt.gov/

### State Higher Education Agency

Montana University SystemOffice of the Commissioner of Higher Education560 N. Park AveP.O. Box 203201Helena, MT 59620-3201Phone: (406) 449-9124Website: http://www.mus.edu/

### Special Education Agency

Division of Special EducationMontana State Office of Public InstructionP.O. Box 202501Helena, MT 59620Phone: (406) 444-0037Website: http://opi.mt.gov/Leadership/Assessment-Accountability/Special-Education

### State Adult Education Agency

Division of Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Office of Public Instruction P.O. Box 202501 1227 11th Avenue Helena, MT 59620-2501 Phone: (406) 594-3750Website: http://opi.mt.gov/Families-Students/Student-Resources/Veterans-Adult-Education

Back to state map
Exhibit 10.15


                  Compensation for Research and Development and

                      Technology for Field Emission Display
                      -------------------------------------

This Agreement is between CopyTele, Inc. ("CopyTele") located at 900 Walt
Whitman Road, Melville, New York 11747, and Volga Svet Ltd. ("Volga Svet")
located at 101 Prospekt 50 let Oktyabrya, Saratov, 410052, Russia.

The amount of compensation by CopyTele to Volga in accordance with Sections 5.2
and 9 of the Agreement dated 10 May, 2001 between CopyTele and Volga Svet (the
"10 May Agreement") is set forth in Attachment 1. The funds to be received by
Volga will be used mainly for research and development, purchasing of facilities
and production areas for Field Emission Display technology for additional work
to be performed by Volga during Phase I of the 10 May Agreement. The
compensation includes payments for license rights under Russia Patent No.
2152662.

It is agreed that the first paragraph of Section 9 of the 10 May Agreement be
modified to read as follows:

Volga shall grant to CopyTele a non-exclusive, irrevocable and worldwide license
of its background Patents and Background Technology with the right to CopyTele
to sublicense Futaba, its Affiliates and Associates upon payment by Futaba to
CopyTele and CopyTele to Volga of the amounts referenced in Paragraph 5.2.



Volga Svet Ltd.                                    CopyTele, Inc.
By: /s/ Boris I. Gorfinkel                         By:/s/ Denis A. Krusos
    ----------------------                            -------------------
     Boris I. Gorfinkel                                 Denis A. Krusos
     Director                                           Chairman of the Board

Date: February 1, 2002                             Date: February 1, 2002

Agreed with:
N.D. Zhukov, Director,
R&D Institute, Volga

/s/ N.D. Zhukov


<PAGE>

                                  Attachment 1
                                  ------------

                                  Compensation
                                  ------------

The payment of $US 750,000.00 will be transferred by CopyTele to the account of
Volga Svet according to the following schedule:

               February 4, 2002                   $US 200,000.00

               March 4, 2002                      $US 100,000.00

               April 4, 2002                      $US 150,000.00

               May 4, 2002                        $US 150,000.00

               June 4, 2002                       $US 150,000.00

               Total                              $US 750,000.00

Payments are effected without submission of invoices from Volga Svet
Bank references Volga Svet Ltd.:
Israel Discount Bank of New York,
New York, USA






                                       2
CBI Designation related to Three Documents, January 14, 2011 Document 

Request 

JILL.A.LlSKA to: Gail Fallon 02/08/2011 03:55 PM 

Cc: Denise Kennedy 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Gail, 

Pursuant to the conversation with you and Denise just now, and the EPA's 

January 24th letters notifying us of a disclosure of CBI to EPA's 

contractor, it is my understanding that the EPA has requested that S&L 

(with Basin's concurrence) dedesignate three documents that we had 

designated as CBI in our January 14, 2011 Document Request Response. 

Those three documents are: low-high dust scr-leland old2- Sens2-cat 

life_052009.xls; low-high dust scr-leland old2- Sens2-cat life 052109.xls; 

and low-high dust scr-leland old2- Sens2-cat life.xls . 

Please accept this email as notification that Sargent & Lundy, with Basin 

Electric's concurrence, agrees that the above three files are no longer 

claimed to be CBI by S&L. 

Jill A. Liska 

Senior Associate Counsel 

Tel: 312 . 269.2578 

Fax: 312 . 269.9731 

Email: jill. a.liska@sargentlundy.com 

THIS MESSAGE AND ANY FILES ATTACHED TO IT ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY CONTAIN 

INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE 

LAW. THEY ARE INTENDED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO 

WHOM THEY ARE ADDRESSED . If you are not the intended recipient of this 

message or the person responsible for delivering this message to the 

intended recipient, you have received this message in error. Under those 

circumstances, any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of 

this message or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited.