alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3003.204 Treatment of violations. ( a ) The HCA is the official designated to make the determination under (FAR) 48 CFR 3.204(a) whether a gratuities violation has occurred. If the HCA has been personally and substantially involved in the specific procurement, the advice of legal counsel should be sought to determine whether the CPO should designate an alternate decision maker.
( b ) The HCA shall ensure that the hearing procedures required by (FAR) 48 CFR 3.204(b) are afforded to the contractor. Legal counsel shall be consulted regarding the appropriateness of the hearing procedures that are established.
( c ) If the HCA determines that the alleged gratuities violation occurred the HCA shall consult with legal counsel regarding appropriate action and notify the Office of Inspector General.
[77 FR 50633, Aug. 22, 2012]
2401.302 Limitations. ( c ) *Exclusions.* Certain HUD policies and procedures which come within the scope of this chapter are not included in the HUDAR. Not included is a policy or procedure of an internal nature or which is expected to be effective for a period of less than six months.
hctmle.htm


    EXHIBIT 10.2

     

    TRADEMARK LICENSE EXTENSION
AGREEMENT

    (HALLMARK
CHANNEL)

    


    


    This Extension Agreement dated as of
August 15, 2009 is by and between Hallmark Licensing, Inc. (“Hallmark
Licensing”) and Crown Media United States, LLC (“Crown US”).

    


    WHEREAS, Crown US and Hallmark
Licensing have previously entered into that certain

    Amended
and Restated Trademark License Agreement between the parties dated as of March
27, 2001 as extended on November 30, 2002, as of August 28, 2003, as of August
1, 2004, as of August 1, 2005, as of April 10, 2006, as of August 1, 2007, and
as of August 1, 2008 (the “License Agreement”); and

    


    WHEREAS, the parties desire to further
extend the term of the License Agreement;

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, Crown US and Hallmark
Licensing hereby agree as follows:

    


    The term of the License Agreement shall
be extended for an additional period terminating on September 1, 2010, subject
to any earlier termination pursuant to the terms of the License
Agreement.

    


    All other terms and conditions of the
License Agreement will remain unchanged and in full force and
effect.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have executed this Extension Agreement as of the date set forth
above.

    


    


    HALLMARK                                LICENSING,
INC.

    


    


    By: /s/ Deanne
Stedem

    


    Title:/s/ Vice
President

    


    


    CROWN
MEDIA UNITED STATES, LLC

    


    By:/s/ Charlie
Stanford

    


    Title:/s/ Vice
President
ABSTRACT

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Preschool Development Grant Proposal

This Grant represents a unique opportunity for Puerto Rico to strengthen its preschool services and develop 

a high quality continuum of services. Puerto Rico’s Department of Education (PRDE) is the Grant’s Lead 

Agency. The Departments of Family, Health and the State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education 

and Care (SAC) are the Grant’s strategic collaborators. 

A significant outcome of the Program will be the establishment of formal and comprehensive agreements 

between Head Start Programs and Puerto Rico’s Department of Education (PRDE) for the joint provision 

of voluntary preschool services in Puerto Rico’s public schools. Through the Preschool Development Grant 

award PRDE along with its Advisory Board will select sub grantees to provide high quality preschool 

services in high need geographical clusters. Another significant outcome of the Program will be to 

strengthening and expansion of the Quality Rating and Improvement System (PASITOS) and the Statewide 

Longitudinal Data System. 

In Puerto Rico, forty-five percent (45%) of the population lives below the poverty level and twenty-five 

percent (25%) live in Extreme Poverty. By comparison, the proportions of people living in Poverty and 

Extreme Poverty in the US were fifteen (15%) and six point six (6.6%) percent respectively. Puerto Rico’s 

poverty rates are significantly higher than the rates of US states with the highest levels of poverty. 

In order to select high need clusters for Program implementation, a Composite Community Needs Index 

was created to help determine (1) whether there were communities with both high levels of socioeconomic 

deprivation and low levels of service; and, (2) whether any geographical concentrations of the two risk 

indices can be identified. The concentration of geographically contiguous High-Need counties, as per the 

second criterion, would potentially enable implementation via a regional service delivery model, which 

simultaneously allows maximizing investment by ensuring returns to scale in the use of resources and 

enables depth in the delivery of high quality services to otherwise underserved communities.

Puerto Rico’s Preschool Development Grant Program establishes an ambitious yet achievable plan to serve 

two thousand (2,000) children at the end of the fourth grant year through High Quality Preschool Programs. 

A total of 192 existing preschool slots will be improved to meet High Quality service standards and 1,808 

new slots will be created for children under the 200% level of poverty.
Title III of *ESEA* requires states to establish an accountability system under which districts are responsible for moving EL students toward English language proficiency.  When first enacted in 2001, it gave states until the 2002–03 school year to establish standards and assessments related to English language proficiency, referred to here as ELP standards and assessments. In 2005, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) extended this deadline to spring 2006.  

Title III also requires states to establish three Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) related to these ELP standards and assessments and the academic achievement assessments required under Title I. These AMAOs, which apply only to districts rather than individual schools, address the following criteria:
#### 2901.105-3 Copies.

Copies of the DOLAR published in the Federal Register or the CFR may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Requests should reference the DOLAR as chapter 29 of title 48. The DOLAR is also available electronically at the Government Printing Office web page, *https://www.ecfr.gov/.* The CFR is printed in paperback edition with updates as needed.
#### Donna Nardella, Appellant, v Zachary Emanuel Gerut, Respondent.

[834 NYS2d 104]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson S. Roman, J.), entered October 24, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted defendant’s posttrial motion for a new trial on damages for future pain and suffering unless plaintiff stipulated to reduce the jury award on that element from $200,000 to $20,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The result of plaintiff’s nasal reconstructive surgery was cosmetically not to her satisfaction. The court found no medical support for future pain or difficulty in breathing. Reduction of damages for future pain and suffering was thus warranted because the amount awarded by the jury deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501 [c]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.
Attachment IX

Public Participation
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District 

APRIL 22, 2014  THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).  1. Case No.  SD32641   Re: STATE OF MISSOURI,   Plaintiff-Respondent,   vs.   PATRICK BRIGGS HAUBBERT,   Defendant-Appellant.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT,that each of the undersigned
directors and officers of AMCORE Financial, Inc., a Nevada corporation, which is about to file an annual report for the year ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 on Form 10-K with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., 20549 hereby constitutes and appoints WILLIAM R. MCMANAMAN and JUDITH CARRÉ SUTFIN, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agents with power of substitution and
resubstitution, from them and in their name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys Form 10-K and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto the
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they might or could do in
person, thereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,know that the undersigned as a director or officer has hereunto set their hand as of this 22ndday of March, 2010.



|                            |  |  |  |                                |  | 
|--------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/    Paula A.
Bauer       |  |  |  | /s/    Paul Donovan            |  | 
|Paula A. Bauer              |  |  |  | Paul Donovan                   |  | 
|                            |  |  | 
|/s/    John W.
Gleeson      |  |  |  | /s/    John A. Halbrook        |  | 
|John W. Gleeson             |  |  |  | John A. Halbrook               |  | 
|                            |  |  | 
|/s/    Frederick D.
Hay     |  |  |  | /s/    Teresa Iglesias-Solomon |  | 
|Frederick D. Hay            |  |  |  | Teresa Iglesias-Solomon        |  | 
|                            |  |  | 
|/s/    William R.
McManaman |  |  |  | /s/    Steven S. Rogers        |  | 
|William R. McManaman        |  |  |  | Steven S. Rogers               |  | 
|                            |  |  | 
|/s/    Jack D.
Ward         |  |  |  |                                |  | 
|Jack D. Ward                |  |  |  |                                |  |
239.7301 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Covered item of supply* means an item of information technology that is purchased for inclusion in a covered system, and the loss of integrity of which could result in a supply chain risk for a covered system (see 10 U.S.C. 3252).
*Covered system* means a national security system, as that term is defined at 44 U.S.C. 3552(b) (see 10 U.S.C. 3252). It is any information system, including any telecommunications system, used or operated by an agency or by a contractor of an agency, or other organization on behalf of an agency— ( 1 ) The function, operation, or use of which— ( i ) Involves intelligence activities;
( ii ) Involves cryptologic activities related to national security;
( iii ) Involves command and control of military forces;
( iv ) Involves equipment that is an integral part of a weapon or weapons system; or
( v ) Is critical to the direct fulfillment of military or intelligence missions but this does not include a system that is to be used for routine administrative and business applications, including payroll, finance, logistics, and personnel management applications; or
( 2 ) Is protected at all times by procedures established for information that have been specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order or an Act of Congress to be kept classified in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.
*Information technology* (see 40 U.S.C 11101(6)) means, in lieu of the definition at FAR 2.1, any equipment, or interconnected system(s) or subsystem(s) of equipment, that is used in the automatic acquisition, storage, analysis, evaluation, manipulation, management, movement, control, display, switching, interchange, transmission, or reception of data or information by the agency. ( 1 ) For purposes of this definition, equipment is used by an agency if the equipment is used by the agency directly or is used by a contractor under a contract with the agency that requires— ( i ) Its use; or
( ii ) To a significant extent, its use in the performance of a service or the furnishing of a product.
( 2 ) The term “information technology” includes computers, ancillary equipment (including imaging peripherals, input, output, and storage devices necessary for security and surveillance), peripheral equipment designed to be controlled by the central processing unit of a computer, software, firmware and similar procedures, services (including support services), and related resources.
( 3 ) The term “information technology” does not include any equipment acquired by a contractor incidental to a contract.
*Supply chain risk* means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or operation of such system (see 10 U.S.C. 3252).
[78 FR 69271, Nov. 18, 2013. Redesignated and amended at 80 FR 67251, Oct. 30, 2015; 83 FR 15995, Apr. 13, 2018; 84 FR 4369, Feb. 15, 2019; 87 FR 76995, Dec. 16, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     $928,644
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    $43,732
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        $128,702
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      $150,305
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      $0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $1,251,383
<COMMON>                                       $87,775
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     $263,127
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           $129,739
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                $480,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          $35,000
<PREFERRED>                                    $21,030
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          $361,244
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   $1,544
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                $351,924
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               $1,251,383
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     $143,882
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           $10,839
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $109,040
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $119,879
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        $24,003
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              $1,791
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 $25,794
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        $6,627
<NET-INCOME>                                   $19,167
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       $807
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  $18,360
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        $9,161
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           $0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         $36,062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       $0
        

</TABLE>
#### 432.703-3 Contracts crossing fiscal years.

Funds appropriated to USDA may be used for one-year contracts which are to be performed in two fiscal years so long as the total amount for such contracts is obligated in the year for which the funds are appropriated (7 U.S.C. 2209c).
#### 34.001 Definition.

*Effective competition,* as used in this part, is a market condition that exists when two or more contractors, acting independently, actively contend for the Government's business in a manner that ensures that the Government will be offered the lowest cost or price alternative or best technical design meeting its minimum needs.

[50 FR 27562, July 3, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 52434, Dec. 23, 1985; 51 FR 27116, July 29, 1986; 61 FR 41470, Aug. 8, 1996; 66 FR 2132, Jan. 10, 2001]
# C_2019117EN.01000201.xml

| 29.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 March 2019

(2019/C 117/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1218 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4657 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85555 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4760 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1185 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7380 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,786 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 319,86 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2950 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7591 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3408 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5850 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5066 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8061 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6509 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5227 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 277,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4942 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5595 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4300 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 005,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5797 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,303 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,1411 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,752 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4592 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7835 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,7765 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1218

JPY

Japanese yen

124,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4657

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85555

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4760

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1185

ISK

Iceland króna

137,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7380

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,786

HUF

Hungarian forint

319,86

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2950

RON

Romanian leu

4,7591

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3408

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5850

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5066

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8061

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6509

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5227

KRW

South Korean won

1 277,91

ZAR

South African rand

16,4942

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5595

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4300

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 005,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5797

PHP

Philippine peso

59,303

RUB

Russian rouble

73,1411

THB

Thai baht

35,752

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4592

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7835

INR

Indian rupee

77,7765

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           December Is National Impaired Driving Prevention Month      

# December Is National Impaired Driving Prevention Month

National Impaired Driving Prevention Month is a time to spread awareness of the risks, and strengthening efforts to prevent drugged driving. This blog post highlights the potential fatal outcomes of drugged driving and highlights the efforts of individuals, communities, and states to work toward improving safety. Learn more.
Exhibit 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                               AMEREN CORPORATION
                         (required by Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection  with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended June
30, 2004 of Ameren  Corporation (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"),  I, Warner L. Baxter,
chief financial officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Form 10-Q fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 9, 2004



                                          /s/ Warner L. Baxter
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Warner L. Baxter
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131449 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131449 COA: 269270 Roscommon CC: 05-005058-FH; 05-005059-FH DONALD RAY SWANIGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY
, JJ., would remand this case to the trial court for a hearing.

p1122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2006

Clerk
#### 47.204 Single-movement contracts.

Single-movement contracts may be awarded for unique transportation services that are not otherwise available under carrier tariffs or covered by DOD or GSA contracts; e.g., special requirements at origin and/or destination.