alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE 84.326C

Absolute Priority: 

Organization: 

Project Title: 

Start Date: 

End Date: 

Project Director: 

Full Name: 

Address Line 1: 

Address Line 2: 

City: 

State: 

Zip Code: 

Telephone: 

Email: 

Average Time on

Project, Year 1 (%)*: 

*Example: enter .2532 for 25.32%.

Additional Key Personnel (not including project director/s listed above): 

Full Name / Degree Program 

Position / Average 

Time on Project, 

Year 1 (%)* 

*Example: enter .2532 for 25.32%.

Email 
 

 

2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE: 84.326C PAGE 2 

Briefly describe the purpose and expected outcomes. (100 words or fewer) 

Briefly describe how the project will be designed, managed, and evaluated to 

address the identified outcomes. (100 words or fewer) 
Disability (or disabilities) focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

 

 

 

2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE: 84.326C PAGE 3 

Autism 

Deaf-blindness 

Deafness 

Developmental delay (DD) 

Emotional disturbance (ED) 

Hearing impairment 

Intellectual disability 

Multiple disabilities 

Orthopedic impairment 

Other health impairment 

Specific learning disability 

Speech or language impairment 

Traumatic brain injury 

Visual impairment 

Age group(s) of students with disabilities focused on by the project 

(check all that apply): 

Birth to 3 

Preschool 

Elementary School 

Middle School 

High School 

Postsecondary 

Target content area(s) focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

Assessment 

Behavior 

Early Childhood 

Inclusive Practices 

Instructional Strategies 

Literacy 

STEM 

MTSS 

Data Collection, Analysis and Use (373) 

ELs with Disabilities 

Accessible Educational Materials 

Technology Research and Development 

Assistive and Instructional Technology 

Transition Services 

Dropout Prevention 

Family Engagement 

Related Services 

Dispute Resolution 

Geography focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

Urban Suburban Rural
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Jurisdiction of     Percent of Common
Name of Subsidiary                                   Organization        Stock Owned
------------------                                   ---------------     ---------------
<S>                                                  <C>                 <C>
AMCORE Bank, N.A.                                    United States       100%

AMCORE Investment Group, N.A.                        United States       100%

AMCORE Consumer Finance Company, Inc.                Nevada              100%

AMCORE Investment Banking, Inc.                      Illinois            100%

AMCORE Financial Life Insurance Company              Arizona             100%

AMCORE Capital Trust I                               Delaware            100%

Central States Title Company, Inc.                   Illinois            100%

ARP Holdings, LLC                                    Delaware            100%

AMCORE Mortgage, Inc.                                Nevada              100%

AFI Nevada, Inc.                                     Nevada              100%

AIG Liquidating Corp.                                Illinois            100%

AMCORE Investment Services, Inc.                     Illinois            100%

Investors Management Group, Ltd. - Rockford          Illinois            100%

Investors Management Group, Ltd. - Des Moines        Iowa                100%

AMCORE Capital Value, Inc.                           Iowa                100%

AMCORE Real Properties, LLC                          Delaware            100%
</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Factors Associated with Bullying Victimization and Bullying Perpetration in Children and Adolescents With ADHD: 2016 to 2017 National Survey of Children’s Health      

# Resource: Factors Associated with Bullying Victimization and Bullying Perpetration in Children and Adolescents With ADHD: 2016 to 2017 National Survey of Children’s Health

This study examined bullying involvement among children with ADHD. Findings reveal that children with ADHD frequently were bullying victims and sometimes bullying perpetrators. Factors related to family financial strain, developmental disabilities, emotional regulation, peer relationships, and school functioning may help to identify risk for bullying and opportunities for anti-bullying interventions. **Learn more.**
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


November 13, 1998



Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

         Re:    Cleco Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 2-79671,
                33-10169, 33-38362 and 33-44663) and Form S-3 (Nos. 33-24895,
                33-62950 and 333-02895)

We are aware that our report dated October 26, 1998 on our review of the interim
financial information of Cleco Corporation as of September 30, 1998 and for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 included in
this Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference in the above mentioned registration
statements. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this
report should not be considered a part of the registration statements prepared
or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
# C_2017411EN.01000201.xml

| 2.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 411/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 411/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 December 2017

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 December 2017

(2017/C 411/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1885 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4420 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9487 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1691 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8753 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,524 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2129 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6305 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6718 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5693 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5301 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2853 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7349 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6014 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 287,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2907 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8551 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5553 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 082,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8620 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,873 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,6973 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,781 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8824 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1942 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,6550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1885

JPY

Japanese yen

133,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4420

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88115

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9487

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1691

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8753

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,524

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2129

RON

Romanian leu

4,6305

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6718

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5693

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5301

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2853

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7349

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6014

KRW

South Korean won

1 287,47

ZAR

South African rand

16,2907

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8551

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5553

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 082,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8620

PHP

Philippine peso

59,873

RUB

Russian rouble

69,6973

THB

Thai baht

38,781

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8824

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1942

INR

Indian rupee

76,6550

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
Executive Orde r 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: V^^Y^ O ? ^ ^Cu^^fA^i ^ k ^ 1^ pig^/ Qiiy H 

^ ^ "y^ti^ 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s)-. \ f^ ^ 

1. E.O. 12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of EO. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory AtTairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

Y The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

^W" ^ 

Signature 

Name 

Titlc/OfTicc^ r 

Date
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7245

CALVIN GEORGIA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PENINSULA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; DOCTOR KLUG; WICOMICO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; ROBIN ROBERTS; WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees, and GEORGIA TINGLE; DOCTOR SHARMA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA98-33-S) Submitted: November 30, 1998 Decided: December 21, 1998Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Calvin Georgia, Appellant Pro Se. John Russell Penhallegon, Gary Elliott Dumer, Jr., CORNBLATT, BENNETT, PENHALLEGON & ROBERSON,P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; David Randolph Thompson, COWDREY, THOMPSON & KARSTEN, P.A., Easton, Maryland; Kevin Bock Karpinski, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Calvin Georgia appeals the district court's order denying his motion for default judgment/summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Georgia’s motion for default judgment against Appellee Klug based on Klug’s failure to timely answer Georgia’s complaint. We also conclude the court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees because there was no genuine issue of material fact and the Defendants-Appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Georgia v. Peninsula Reg’l Med. Ctr. , No. CA-98-33-S (D. Md. July 29, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2750

2750

2650

2600

2600

2750

2700

2700

2650

2750

2650

2650

2700

11 RD

10

RD

H RD

12 RD

K K RD

15 RD

C RD

G RD

16

RD

F RD

J J RD

D RD

E RD

13 RD

11 RD

10

RD

H RD

12 RD

K K RD

15 RD

C RD

G RD

16

RD

F RD

J J RD

D RD

E RD

13 RD

Crooked Creek

760

100°

44

E

N

74

41

41

38

39

3

49

25'

37°

3

46

30'

41

740

41

3

1

41

37°

75

41

000m

77

41

41

69 72

41

37°

47

50

73

43

000 70

N

3

41

27'

48

22'

41

22'

45

3 3 000

30'

3

3 3

FEET

41

3

41

68

22'

40

27'

41

41

49

78

580

69 72

46

30"

38

000m 3

41

3

41

30' 3

44

41

41

41

41

30"

41

39

76

41

77

30"

25'

74

30"

41

41

70 37°

100°

48

51

30"

45

FEET

50

3

51

3

47

3

40

25'

30' 3

43

41

FEET 3 3

000

41

41

42

41

000m

68 75

76

100°

73

3

78000m

E

1 620 000

FEET

25'

27'30"

27'30" 100°22'30"

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

MEADE NW, KS

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

MEADE NW QUADRANGLE

KANSAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14S

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads........National Transportation Dataset, 2006

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Kansas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 52 ́

16 MILS

6° 23 ́

113 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14S

LG

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Plains NE

Plains

Meade NW Meade NE

Missler

Montezuma

SE

Meade

Copeland

SE Montezuma

KANSAS
# C_2021136EN.01000501.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 April 2021

(2021/C 136/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1986 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4368 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86793 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1055 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1011 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 151,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0180 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,927 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 361,10 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5509 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9263 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,6692 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5459 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4986 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3152 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6725 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5980 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0967 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8157 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5668 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 420,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9466 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,001 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,8921 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,420 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,7400 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,8806 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,2355 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1986

JPY

Japanese yen

130,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4368

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86793

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1055

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1011

ISK

Iceland króna

151,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0180

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,927

HUF

Hungarian forint

361,10

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5509

RON

Romanian leu

4,9263

TRY

Turkish lira

9,6692

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5459

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4986

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3152

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6725

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5980

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,70

ZAR

South African rand

17,0967

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8157

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5668

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 420,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9466

PHP

Philippine peso

58,001

RUB

Russian rouble

90,8921

THB

Thai baht

37,420

BRL

Brazilian real

6,7400

MXN

Mexican peso

23,8806

INR

Indian rupee

89,2355

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

CENTEX CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Laurence E. Hirsch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ LAURENCE E. HIRSCHLaurence E. HirschChief Executive OfficerDate: February 9, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00606-CR

Bobby S. ARCE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR11784

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 23, 2019

DISMISSED 

Bobby S. Arce pled nolo contendere to a felony offense pursuant to a plea agreement. As 

part of his plea-bargain, Arce signed a separate “Waiver of Appeal.” The trial court imposed 

sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO 

right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Arce timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s 

record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) 

certification, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a 
04-19-00606-CR

- 2 -

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” 

Id.

This court gave Arce notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial 

court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within 

thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2003, order) (en banc), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 

2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Arce’s appointed appellate counsel filed a 

written response, stating he has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After 

reviewing the record and counsel’s response, we agree that Arce does not have a right to appeal. 

See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should 

review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore 

dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### 42.403 Evaluation of contract administration offices.

Onsite inspections or evaluations of the performance of the assigned functions of a contract administration office shall be accomplished only by or under the direction of the agency of which that office is a part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     $930,513
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    $31,980
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        $115,403
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      $170,074
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      $0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $1,247,970
<COMMON>                                       $87,775
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     $284,465
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           $120,820
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                $480,698
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          $35,000
<PREFERRED>                                    $21,030
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          $362,651
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   $1,501
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                $347,090
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               $1,247,970
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     $393,987
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           $25,462
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $309,971
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $335,433
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        $58,554
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              $6,441
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 $64,995
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       $19,679
<NET-INCOME>                                   $45,316
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     $2,422
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  $42,894
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       $27,895
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           $0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         $95,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       $0
        

</TABLE>