alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018400EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/13 |

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 400/07)

![Image](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2018.400.01.0013.01.ENG.xhtml.C_2018400EN.01001302.tif.jpg)

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Vatican City State

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018400EN.01001301-E0001). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018400EN.01001301-E0002), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country
: The Vatican City State

Subject of commemoration
: 50th Anniversary of the death of Padre Pio

Description of the design
: The design features the right profile of a portrait of Padre Pio. At the top, from left to right, in semi-circle is the inscription of the issuing country ‘CITTÀ DEL VATICANO’. At the bottom is the inscription ‘Padre Pio’ and at its right the mint mark ‘R’. At the left hand of the design is the year ‘1968’ and at the right is the year of issuance ‘2018’. At the bottom left is the name of the artist ‘P.DANIELE’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
:

101 000

Date of issue
:

4 October 2018

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018400EN.01001301-E0001)  See [OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2001_373_R_TOC) for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018400EN.01001301-E0002)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation ([OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2009_009_R_TOC)).

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cybrdi Inc. (“We") for the
period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yanbiao Bai, the chief executive
officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of us.





Date:  August
16, 2010





/s/ Yanbiao BaiYanbiao
      Bai, CEO and President
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                             |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                             | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of English Language Acquisition Home |
|                                             |

**2023**

**2023 NAM Grantees** PDF (65 KB)

**2023 NAM Grantees Abstracts** PDF (81 KB)

**2021**

**2021 NAM Grantees** PDF (123 KB)

**2021 NAM Grantees Abstracts** PDF (162 KB)

**2018**

**2018 NAM Grantees** PDF (16 KB)

**2018 NAM Grantees Abstracts** PDF (20 KB)

**2016**

**2016 NAM Grantees** PDF (42 KB)

**2016 NAM Grantees Abstracts** PDF (236 KB)

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
The Department has developed the following Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)

performance measures for evaluating the overall effectiveness of the 2021 NPD program: 

Measure 1: The percentage of project-specific annual goals the program met.

Measure 2: The number of pre-service program participants enrolled annually.

Measure 3: The unduplicated number of in-service program participants served annually. 

Measure 4: Under measures 2 and 3, the number of participants who are making progress toward 

becoming State certified, licensed, or endorsed in EL instruction and the number of participants who 

have become State certified, licensed, or endorsed by the end of the five-year project period.
**Strengthening Historically Black Graduate Institutions (HBGI) Program**

**FY 2020 Grantees and Awards**
2017 Annual Performance Report

*We have posted the 2017 Annual Performance Reports (APRs).*

- State Individual Preschool Development Grants Annual Performance  Reports for 2017
Alabama
[PDF, 1.5M]
Arkansas
[PDF, 1.5M]
Arizona
[PDF, 1.5M]
Connecticut
[PDF, 1.5M]
Hawaii
[PDF, 1.5M]
Illinois
[PDF, 1.5M]
Louisiana
[PDF, 1.5M]
Massachusetts
[PDF, 1.5M]
Maryland
[PDF, 1.5M]
Maine
[PDF, 1.5M]
Montana
[PDF, 1.5M]
New Jersey
[PDF, 1.5M]
Nevada
[PDF, 1.5M]
New York
[PDF, 1.5M]
Rhode Island
[PDF, 1.5M]
Tennessee
[PDF, 1.5M]
Virginia
[PDF, 1.5M]
Vermont
[PDF, 1.5M]
2016 Annual Performance Report
*We have posted the 2016 Annual Performance Reports (APRs).*
- State Individual Preschool Development Grants Annual Performance  Reports for 2016
Alabama
[PDF, 1.5M]
Arkansas
[PDF, 1.5M]
Arizona
[PDF, 1.5M]
Connecticut
[PDF, 1.5M]
Hawaii
[PDF, 1.5M]
Illinois
[PDF, 1.5M]
Louisiana
[PDF, 1.5M]
Massachusetts
[PDF, 1.5M]
Maryland
[PDF, 1.5M]
Maine
[PDF, 1.5M]
Montana
[PDF, 1.5M]
New Jersey
[PDF, 1.5M]
Nevada
[PDF, 1.5M]
New York
[PDF, 1.5M]
Rhode Island
[PDF, 1.5M]
Tennessee
[PDF, 1.5M]
Virginia
[PDF, 1.5M]
Vermont
[PDF, 1.5M]
2015 Annual Performance Report
*The U.S. Departments of Education and Health and Human Services have released a report, “At a Glance: Preschool Development Grants Program Year 2015 Progress Update,” that highlights some of the work undertaken by the eighteen States during 2015.*
- Preschool Development Grants Year 2015 Progress Update   [PDF, 1.7M]
- State Individual Preschool Development Grants Annual Performance  Reports for 2015
Alabama
[PDF, 1.5M]
Arkansas
[PDF, 1.5M]
Arizona
[PDF, 1.5M]
Connecticut
[PDF, 1.5M]
Hawaii
[PDF, 1.5M]
Illinois
[PDF, 1.5M]
Louisiana
[PDF, 1.5M]
Massachusetts
[PDF, 1.5M]
Maryland
[PDF, 1.5M]
Maine
[PDF, 1.5M]
Montana
[PDF, 1.5M]
New Jersey
[PDF, 1.5M]
Nevada
[PDF, 1.5M]
New York
[PDF, 1.5M]
Rhode Island
[PDF, 1.5M]
Tennessee
[PDF, 1.5M]
Virginia
[PDF, 1.5M]
Vermont
[PDF, 1.5M]
 Monitoring Reports: **State****Monitoring Reports**Alabama
Monitoring Reports1/13/2017
Arizona
Monitoring Reports11/28/2016
Arkansas
Monitoring Reports11/4/2016
Connecticut
Monitoring Reports11/30/2016
Hawaii
Monitoring Reports11/14/2016
Illinois
Monitoring Reports11/29/2016
Louisiana
Monitoring Reports11/2/2016
Maine
Monitoring Reports1/9/2017
Massachusetts
Monitoring Reports10/25/16
Maryland
Monitoring Reports1/4/2017
Montana
Monitoring Reports10/30/2016
Nevada
Monitoring Reports8/10/2016
New Jersey
Monitoring Reports11/30/2016
New York
Monitoring Reports9/14/2016
Rhode Island   
Monitoring Reports10/27/2016
Tennessee
Monitoring Reports1/13/2017
Vermont
Monitoring Reports1/10/2017
Virginia
Monitoring Reports1/4/2017
  Last Modified: 09/27/2018
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-41029

Summary Calendar

Larry Fisher,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

J.B. Smith; Judy Taylor;

East Texas Medical Center ;

Louis Roach,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:94-CV-463)

July 19, 1996

Before WISDOM, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The plaintiff-appellant, Larry Fisher, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action. Fisher’s

suit contends that the defendants-appellees violated his constitutional rights by denying him adequate

medical care while he was a pretrial detainee in Smith County, Texas. The magistrate judge assigned

to this case found that Fisher received adequate medical care, and that his complaint was frivolous

because: 1) the defendant East Texas Medical Center is not a person for purposes of 28 U.S.C.1 Thomkins v. Belt, 828 F.2d 298, 304 (5th Cir. 1987) (a supervisor can be held liable

under § 1983 only if he or she was personally involved in the constitutional violation or if their is a

causal connection between the supervisor’s conduct and the violation).

2 Hare v. City of Corinth, MS, 74 F.3d 633, 645 (5th Cir. 1996) ( en banc ).

3 We review the §1915(d) dismissal of a civil rights suit only for abuse of discretion.

Boyd v. Biggers, 31 F.3d 279, 282 (5th Cir. 1994).

4 Robertson v. Plano City of Tex., 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1955).

2 §1983; 2) defendants Smith and Taylor were sued only in their capacities as supervisors, and cannot

be held liable on a theory of r espondeat superior ; 1 and 3) defendant Dr. Roach was sued only for

alleged negligence, which cannot provide the basis for a civil rights lawsuit. 2 Accordingly, the district

court dismissed Fisher’s suit as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). We have reviewed the

briefs and the record and find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s findings. 3 In his

ap peal Fisher also raises two new issues not presented to the lower court. Fisher argues that

defendant-appellee, Sheriff J.B. Smith, failed to properly segregate Fisher from convicted prisoners,

and also did not allow Fisher sufficient access to a law library during his detention. We decline to

review these new issues because they involve unresolved issues of fact. 4

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the dismissal of Fisher’s complaint.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,634
<SECURITIES>                                     1,795
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,885
<INVENTORY>                                     93,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,172
<PP&E>                                         114,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 308,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,697
<BONDS>                                         68,348
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,630
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   308,968
<SALES>                                        313,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               313,638
<CGS>                                          267,830
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (16,388)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### 42.705-5 Nonprofit organizations other than educational and state and local governments.

See the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and appendix IV; but see appendix VIII for nonprofit organizations exempt from subpart E).

[48 FR 42370, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 45854, July 14, 2016]
');
	document.write('

May 13, 2010

Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Honorable Harry Reid
Majority Leader
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Madam Speaker and Mr. Leader:

We are gravely concerned that ongoing state and local budget  challenges are threatening hundreds of thousands of teacher jobs for the  upcoming school year, with estimates ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 education  jobs at risk.  Without swift action, millions of children will experience  these budget cuts in one way or another through reductions in class time; cuts  to early childhood programs, extracurricular activities, and summer  school; and reduced course offerings as teachers are laid off.  These  budget cuts would also undermine the groundbreaking reform efforts underway in  states and districts all across the country.

At  the very same time as schools face these challenges, budget cuts to police and  fire departments threaten to undermine public safety and the emergency  readiness of first-responders.  All  of these budget cuts threaten to cause damage that ripples through the economy  as a whole.  The layoffs create a new drag on the economy when – despite  the recent encouraging jobs report – we still have a long way to go.  
  We applaud Chairmen Harkin, Miller and Obey for crafting legislation in  direct response to these challenges.  S.  3206, the Keep Our Educators Working Act, H.R. 2847, the Jobs for Main Street  Act,  and H.R. 4812, the Local Jobs for  America Act, each call for $23 billion in emergency support to  preserve education jobs modeled after the State Fiscal Stabilization  Fund (SFSF) established in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act  (ARRA).  This funding would keep teachers in the classroom while helping  to sustain meaningful and necessary reforms in public education across the  country.

We urge Congress to include this funding in the supplemental  appropriations bills soon to be considered.  We also urge Congress to  include $2 billion in support to localities for police and firefighters to  ensure that our communities remain safe, as well as $1 billion in funds for the  Child Care and Development Block Grant to preserve early childhood education jobs  and ensure that our youngest children do not lose the supports and services critical  to their learning and overall well-being.

Thank you for your consideration of these  views.  The Obama Administration looks  forward to working with Congress to refine this legislation as it moves through  the legislative process.



| | Sincerely, 
| | -----------
| | /s/        
| | Arne Duncan

|cc: | Honorable Daniel K. Inouye
|--- | --------------------------
|    | Honorable Tom Harkin      
|    | Honorable  David Obey     
|    | Honorable  George Miller
# C_2019096EN.01003301.xml

| 13.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/33

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 March 2019

(2019/C 96/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1275 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4602 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86145 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5715 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1369 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 135,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7365 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,667 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,35 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2994 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7593 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,1536 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5926 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5111 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8508 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6436 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5292 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 273,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1186 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5643 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4155 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 084,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6047 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,633 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,1045 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,697 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3045 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7677 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,5175 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1275

JPY

Japanese yen

125,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4602

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86145

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5715

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1369

ISK

Iceland króna

135,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7365

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,667

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,35

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2994

RON

Romanian leu

4,7593

TRY

Turkish lira

6,1536

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5926

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5111

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8508

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6436

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5292

KRW

South Korean won

1 273,88

ZAR

South African rand

16,1186

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5643

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4155

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 084,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6047

PHP

Philippine peso

59,633

RUB

Russian rouble

74,1045

THB

Thai baht

35,697

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3045

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7677

INR

Indian rupee

78,5175

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# Title III, Part A, American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Program

# FY 2014 Discretionary Noncompeting Continuation Grantees

[11/18/2014]
# C_2021099EN.01000801.xml

| 23.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 March 2021

(2021/C 99/07)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1926 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86233 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1580 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1023 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 151,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1393 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,075 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 366,90 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6017 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8862 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,4097 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5400 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4903 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2614 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6617 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5992 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 344,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5657 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7582 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 176,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9064 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,843 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 88,9011 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,816 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,5917 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,6337 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,2895 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1926

JPY

Japanese yen

129,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86233

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1580

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1023

ISK

Iceland króna

151,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1393

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,075

HUF

Hungarian forint

366,90

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6017

RON

Romanian leu

4,8862

TRY

Turkish lira

9,4097

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5400

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4903

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2614

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6617

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5992

KRW

South Korean won

1 344,78

ZAR

South African rand

17,5657

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7582

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 176,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9064

PHP

Philippine peso

57,843

RUB

Russian rouble

88,9011

THB

Thai baht

36,816

BRL

Brazilian real

6,5917

MXN

Mexican peso

24,6337

INR

Indian rupee

86,2895

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rocco Carrabis, Also Known as Rocky, Appellant.

— Judgment of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered June 23, 1978, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ. concur.
3404.804-5 Procedures for closing out contract files. ( a ) ( 16 ) The contractor has provided written affirmation that the contractor has transferred all Federal records that the contractor created, received, or maintained in performance of the contract to the Federal Government, and the contractor has not retained a copy of any Federal record that contains information covered by 32 CFR part 2002 or that is generally protected from public disclosure by an exemption under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) with the exception, for the purposes of FOIA, of information that exclusively implicates the exemption 4 interests of the contractor.
#### 34.005-6 Full production.

Contracts for full production of successfully tested major systems selected from the full-scale development phase may be awarded if the agency head (a) reaffirms the mission need and program objectives and (b) grants approval to proceed with production.
#### 2952.242-70 Access to Contractor Business Systems.

As prescribed in 2942.101, insert the following clause:

# Access to Contractor Business Systems (APR 2019)

The contractor shall, upon request, provide to the Government, access to covered contractor systems associated with the execution and performance of this requirement to meet audits, reviews, security requirements, and Office of Inspector General requests.

(End of Clause)