alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 465 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 465

 Electing Michael C. Stenger as Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the 
                                Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2018

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Electing Michael C. Stenger as Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the 
                                Senate.

    Resolved, That Michael C. Stenger of Virginia be, and he is hereby, 
elected Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021103EN.01000301.xml

| 25.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

24 March 2021

(2021/C 103/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1825 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86250 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1635 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1068 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1563 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,206 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 364,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6280 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8880 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,4009 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5532 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4884 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1863 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6963 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5917 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 338,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5248 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7133 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5730 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 082,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8843 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,468 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,2013 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,658 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,5258 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,5236 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,8585 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1825

JPY

Japanese yen

128,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86250

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1635

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1068

ISK

Iceland króna

150,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1563

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,206

HUF

Hungarian forint

364,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6280

RON

Romanian leu

4,8880

TRY

Turkish lira

9,4009

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5532

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4884

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1863

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6963

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5917

KRW

South Korean won

1 338,12

ZAR

South African rand

17,5248

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7133

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5730

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 082,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8843

PHP

Philippine peso

57,468

RUB

Russian rouble

90,2013

THB

Thai baht

36,658

BRL

Brazilian real

6,5258

MXN

Mexican peso

24,5236

INR

Indian rupee

85,8585

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
315.605 Content of unsolicited proposals. ( d ) *Warranty by offeror.* To ensure against contacts between HHS personnel and prospective offerors that would exceed the limits of advance guidance set forth in FAR 15.604 and potentially result in an unfair advantage to an offeror, the prospective offeror of an unsolicited proposal must include the following warranty in any unsolicited proposal. Contracting officers receiving an unsolicited proposal without this warranty shall not process the proposal until the offeror is notified of the missing language and given an opportunity to submit a proper warranty. If no warranty is provided in a reasonable time, the contracting officer shall reject the unsolicited proposal, notify the offeror of the rejection, and document the actions in the file. UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL WARRANTY BY OFFEROR This is to warrant that— ( a ) This proposal has not been prepared under Government supervision; ( b ) The methods and approaches stated in the proposal were developed by this offeror; ( c ) Any contact with HHS personnel has been within the limits of appropriate advance guidance set forth in FAR 15.604; and, ( d ) No prior commitments were received from HHS personnel regarding acceptance of this proposal. Date: Organization: Name: Title:
(This warranty shall be signed by a responsible management official of the proposing organization who is a person authorized to contractually obligate the organization.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2063

VAUGHN V. BRYANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORDSTROM, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1316-A) Submitted: January 25, 2000 Decided: February 4, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vaughn V. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen William Robinson, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Vaughan Bryant appeals the district court’s order enforcing a settlement agreement with Nordstrom, Inc. Bryant alleges that he never agreed to the settlement, and the actions of his counsel werenot binding on him. We review the district court’s order of enforcement for abuse of discretion. Young v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. , 103 F.3d 1180, 1194 (4th Cir. 1997). Having reviewed the record and materials submitted to this court, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in ruling that theparties had reached a settlement agreement and in ordering enforcement of that agreement. We deny Nordstrom, Inc.’s motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certifications**I, Timothy R. Eller, certify that:1.      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Centex Corporation;2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] andinternal control over financial reporting [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)] for the registrant and have:(a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)      Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: January 31, 2006/s/ TIMOTHY R. ELLER
42.1501 General. ( a ) Past performance information (including the ratings and supporting narratives) is relevant information, for future source selection purposes, regarding a contractor's actions under previously awarded contracts or orders. It includes, for example, the contractor's record of— ( 1 ) Conforming to requirements and to standards of good workmanship;
( 2 ) Forecasting and controlling costs;
( 3 ) Adherence to schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance;
( 4 ) Reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction;
( 5 ) Complying with the requirements of the small business subcontracting plan (see 19.705-7(b));
( 6 ) Reporting into databases (see subpart 4.14, and reporting requirements in the solicitation provisions and clauses referenced in 9.104-7);
( 7 ) Integrity and business ethics; and
( 8 ) Business-like concern for the interest of the customer.
( b ) Agencies shall monitor their compliance with the past performance evaluation requirements (see 42.1502), and use the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) metric tools to measure the quality and timely reporting of past performance information. CPARS is the official source for past performance information.
[78 FR 46788, Aug. 1, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 31194, May 30, 2014; 84 FR 47866, Sept. 10, 2019; 86 FR 44254, Aug. 11, 2021]
Exhibit 4 
Charles T. Wehland/JonesDay

Extension 312 269 4388

(54388)

11/17/2009 11:33 AM

To smith.suzanne@epa.gov

cc

bcc

Subject Fw: OG&E BART Presentation

Suzanne,

Thanks for meeting with OG&E earlier this month. The message that I sent to Joe with a copy of the 

presentation is attached. 

We asked Joe for a reference to the FLM study that he mentioned during the meeting, but we have not 

had a response. It would be useful to have the information because OG&E is meeting with the FLM on 

Dec. 7.

Thank you in advance for any help you can provide with this.

* * * Chuck Wehland - 312 269 4388 * * *

----- Forwarded by Charles T. Wehland/JonesDay on 11/17/2009 10:30 AM -----

Charles T. Wehland/JonesDay

Extension 312 269 4388

(54388)

11/03/2009 04:12 PM

To kordzi.joe@epa.gov

cc shoopkl@oge.com, "David Branecky" 

<branecda@oge.com>, brockmcd@oge.com, 

paul.r.predick@sargentlundy.com

Subject OG&E BART Presentation

Joe,

An electronic copy of the presentation made at the meeting today on the OG&E regional haze proposal 

and BART determination is attached. We appreciated the open exchange of information at the meeting.

During the meeting, you mentioned a FLM study that indicated an average SO2 cost effectiveness of 

$2,600 per ton. Can you give me a reference to where we can find that study?

We will be in touch as we work through the process of gathering additional information for DEQ. Please 

do not hesitate to let any of us know if there is information that EPA believes would be helpful.

Thank you.

* * * Chuck Wehland - 312 269 4388 * * *

==========

This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected 

by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system 

without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.
==========

==========

This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected 

by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system 

without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.

==========
# C_2020300EN.01000101.xml

| 10.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

9 September 2020

(2020/C 300/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1773 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4403 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91213 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3620 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0806 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 165,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7150 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,519 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 357,70 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4498 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8588 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,8240 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6264 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5563 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1246 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7714 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6118 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 397,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,7044 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0584 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5370 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 406,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9111 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,276 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 89,3613 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,928 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2785 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,5626 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,6065 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1773

JPY

Japanese yen

125,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4403

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91213

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3620

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0806

ISK

Iceland króna

165,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7150

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,519

HUF

Hungarian forint

357,70

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4498

RON

Romanian leu

4,8588

TRY

Turkish lira

8,8240

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6264

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5563

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1246

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7714

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6118

KRW

South Korean won

1 397,84

ZAR

South African rand

19,7044

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0584

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5370

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 406,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9111

PHP

Philippine peso

57,276

RUB

Russian rouble

89,3613

THB

Thai baht

36,928

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2785

MXN

Mexican peso

25,5626

INR

Indian rupee

86,6065

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
## Annual Performance Report

Grantees are required to submit three types of performance reports:

- Interim Performance Report  (Due after the first six months of the grant)
- Annual Performance Report  (APR) 
- Endowment Fund Report  (Only applies to grantees with an endowment activity)

Reports are completed electronically through the HEPIS reporting portal, https://hepis.ed.gov/. The system can be accessed annually during the open reporting period (opening varies for each type of report). The site also contains recorded technical assistance webinars as well as reporting instructions/users manuals.

To gain access to the APR project directors need the institution's Unit ID, PR Award ID, and a unique password provided by the Institutional Service. Passwords are e-mailed to the grantee project director designated on the grant award notification document 30 days before the collection period begins. Project directors of Title III and Title V grants are responsible for completing and managing the content of their respective annual report.

Note: If you are a project director and have responsibility for completing the annual report for your institution, please be sure you are designated on the official grant award notification and your e-mail and telephone number are listed correctly in the G5 database.  Contact your program officer if you have questions.

## FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT

The online system will generate a final report from grantees' individual annual reports for each grant ending September 30 of the collection period. The online system generates the final performance so that reported data is consistent throughout the life cycle of grants and eliminates each grantee's burden of having to compile a final report.

Institutional Service Home
(August 26, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Levi Monroe, Petitioner, v. Ross E. Herold, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Application, pursuant to CPLR 7002 (subd. [b], par. 2), for a writ of habeas corpus denied for failure of compliance with CPLR (art. 70) and more particularly for petitioner’s failure to verify the petition or to annex to the petition a copy of the mandate by virtue of which he is detained, as required by CPLR, 7002 (subd. [e]), and as otherwise insufficient on its face. Judgment signed and entered. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
# C_2020399EN.01000301.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/3

---

Assignment of Judges to Chambers

(2020/C 399/06)

At its General Meeting on 6 October 2020, the Court decided to assign Ms Ziemele to the Second and the Seventh Chambers and Mr Passer to the Third and the Eighth Chambers.

---
# C_2020255EN.01000101.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2020/C 255/01)

Last publication

OJ C 247, 27.7.2020

Past publications

OJ C 240, 20.7.2020

OJ C 230, 13.7.2020

OJ C 222, 6.7.2020

OJ C 215, 29.6.2020

OJ C 209, 22.6.2020

OJ C 201, 15.6.2020

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Takeo Fukui, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Honda Motor Co., Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

 

5. Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 9, 2004
#### Walter Sussman, Appellant-Respondent, v. Sophie Chylinski, Respondent-Appellant.

In an equity action: (a) to set aside a deed to certain real property on the ground that it was fraudulently procured; and (b) to recover the proceeds of a $5,000 mortgage loan obtained by defendant after the conveyance, the parties cross-appeal as follows from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 6, 1963 upon the oral decision of a Special Referee after a nonjury trial before him: (1) The plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment as failed to award to him the sum of $5,000; and (2) defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the judgment as directed her to reconvey the property, to surrender possession of the property to the plaintiff, and to account to the plaintiff for the rents and profits of the property. Judgment modified on the law and the facts: (1) by striking out its seventh decretal paragraph, awarding $192.75 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff; and (2) by substituting therefor a paragraph directing that plaintiff recover from the defendant $5,000, with interest thereon from December 21, 1961, together with $192.75 costs and disbursements. As so modified, judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. Findings of fact contained in the Special Referee’s decision which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. The learned Referee found that the elderly plaintiff, in conveying his property to defendant, was “grossly defrauded” and that defendant’s testimony was “valueless”. We agree with these conclusions, which are amply supported by the record, but we find that defendant’s testimony to the effect that she lent approximately $5,000 to the plaintiff from an “ accumulation ” of cash in a drawer is likewise incredible, more especially since defendant appears to admit that she perjured herself as to the source of these funds. Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the defendant for the $5,000 which she received by mortgaging the premises, the deed to which she had obtained by fraud. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.