alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| CLECO POWER | EXHIBIT 12(b) |
|-------------|---------------|

|                                                                      |   | FOR THE THREEMONTHS ENDED |   |    | FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|---------|----------------------------------|--------|
| (THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)                                                |   | MARCH 31, 2010            |   |
| Earnings from continuing operations                                       |   | $                         | 32,160 |    |                             | $      | 128,307 |   |
| Income taxes                                                              |   |                      | 12,495 |    |                             |   | 23,992 |   |
| Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes                   |   | $                         | 44,655 |    |                             | $      | 152,299 |   |
| Fixed charges:                                                            |   |                      |   |    |                             |   |   |   |
| Interest, long-term debt                                                  |   | $                         | 18,198 |    |                             | $      | 67,797 |   |
| Interest, other (including interest on short-term debt)                   |   |                      | 3,550  |    |                             |   | 16,111 |   |
| Amortization of debt expense, premium, net                                |   |                      | 568    |    |                             |   | 1,792 |   |
| Portion of rentals representative of an interest factor                   |   |                      | 112    |    |                             |   | 510 |   |
| Interest of capitalized lease                                             |   |                      | 498    |    |                             |   | 2,042 |   |
| Total fixed charges                                                       |   | $                         | 22,926 |    |                             | $      | 88,252 |   |
| Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes                   |   | $                         | 44,655 |    |                             | $      | 152,299 |   |
| Plus:  total fixed charges from above                           |   |                      | 22,926 |    |                             |   | 88,252 |   |
| Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and fixed charges |   | $                         | 67,581 |    |                             | $      | 240,551 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                        |   |                      | 2.95   |  X |                             |   | 2.73 |  X |

----

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**711.3 KA 06-02577**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ERIC HARRIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BARRY L. PORSCH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WATERLOO, FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Seneca County Court (Dennis F. Bender, J.), entered July 31, 2006. The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate a judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in People v Harris ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [June 12, 2015]).

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Options That May Help Survivors of Sexual Violence Continue Their Education and Manage Federal Student Loans      

# Resource: Options That May Help Survivors of Sexual Violence Continue Their Education and Manage Federal Student Loans

This report (PDF, 26 pages) describes policies and practices that selected colleges have implemented to help survivors continue their education. The report also explores repayment options that can help eligible survivors manage their federal student loans. **Learn more** (PDF, 26 pages).
1

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

No. 122,452

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

JEANINE JEFFERSON,

Appellant,

v.

RICKEY L. HOY,

Appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; SEAN M.A. HATFIELD, judge. Opinion filed February 26,

2021. Affirmed.

Jeanine Jefferson, appellant pro se. 

No appearance by appellee.

Before HILL, P.J., GARDNER, J., and BURGESS, S.J.

PER CURIAM: Jeanine Jefferson filed a small claims petition against Rickey Hoy 

claiming $3,000 for repayment of a loan and for not painting her car. Her claim was 

denied for failure of proof. She appealed to the district court. The district court held a 

bench trial de novo, considered the evidence and testimony presented, and determined 

Jefferson presented insufficient evidence to prove her claim. Jefferson appealed to this 

court. We affirm.
2

In this appeal, Jefferson contends that she provided sufficient documentation 

showing Hoy did not complete the paint job on her vehicle as he was hired to do. She 

does not cite to the record on appeal anywhere in her brief. Hoy did not file a response.

When a district court finds that a party did not meet its burden of proof, as here, it 

is a negative factual finding. In reviewing a negative factual finding, the appellate court 

must determine whether the party challenging the finding can prove the district court 

arbitrarily disregarded undisputed evidence or relied upon some extrinsic consideration 

such as bias, passion, or prejudice to reach its decision. Cresto v. Cresto, 302 Kan. 820, 

845, 358 P.3d 831 (2015); Birdsong v. Koch, No. 110,685, 2014 WL 2747734, at *2

(Kan. App. 2014) (unpublished opinion) (applying negative finding standard to small 

claims case). The burden is on the party making a claim to designate a record sufficient to 

present its points to the appellate court and to establish its claims. Friedman v. Kansas 

State Bd. of Healing Arts, 296 Kan. 636, 644, 294 P.3d 287 (2013). This court may 

presume that a factual statement made without reference to a volume and page number of 

the record has no support in the record on appeal. Supreme Court Rule 6.02(a)(4) (2020 

Kan. S. Ct. R. 34). 

Jefferson's factual statements are made without reference to the record on appeal. 

We therefore presume they have no support in the record and affirm the district court. 

Affirmed.
#### 422.406.8 Investigations.

Reports of violations shall be forwarded to the HCA, who shall process such reports in accordance with FAR 22.406-8(d).
52.228-11 Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets. As prescribed in 28.203-4(b), insert the following clause: Individual Surety—Pledge of Assets (FEB 2021) (a) The Contractor shall obtain from each person acting as an individual surety on a performance bond or a payment bond— (1) A pledge of assets that meets the eligibility, valuation, and security requirements described in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 28.203-1; and (2) Standard Form 28, Affidavit of Individual Surety. (b) The Contracting Officer may release a portion of the security interest on the individual surety's assets based upon substantial performance of the Contractor's obligations under its performance bond. The security interest in support of a performance bond shall be maintained— (1) *Contracts for the construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public work of the Federal Government exceeding $150,000 ( 40 U.S.C. 3131 ).* Until completion of any warranty period, or for 1 year following final payment, whichever is later. (2) *Contracts subject to alternative payment protection (see FAR 28.102-1(b)(1)).* For the full contract performance period plus 1 year. (3) *Other contracts not subject to the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this clause.* Until completion of any warranty period, or for 90 days following final payment, whichever is later. (c) A surety's assets pledged in support of a payment bond may be released to a subcontractor or supplier upon Government receipt of a Federal district court judgment, or a sworn statement by the subcontractor or supplier that the claim is correct along with a notarized authorization of the release by the surety stating that it approves of such release. The security interest on the individual surety's assets in support of a payment bond shall be maintained— (1) *Contracts for the construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public work of the Federal Government exceeding $150,000 which require performance and payment bonds ( 40 U.S.C. 3131 ).* For 1 year following final payment, or until resolution of all pending claims filed against the payment bond during the 1-year period following final payment, whichever is later. (2) *Contracts subject to alternative payment protection (see FAR 28.102-1(b)(1)).* For the full contract performance period plus 1 year. (3) *Other contracts not subject to the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this clause.* For 90 days following final payment. (d) The Contracting Officer may allow the Contractor to substitute an individual surety, for a performance or payment bond, after contract award. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this clause within the timeframe established by the Contracting Officer.
(End of clause) [86 FR 3686, Jan. 14, 2021]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6532

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AKIN SEAN EL PRECISE BEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:15-cr-00166-BR-1; 5:19-cv-00209-BR)

Submitted: July 29, 2021 Decided: August 12, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Akin Sean El Precise Bey, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Akin Sean El Precise Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bey has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we grant his motions to file supplemental briefs, deny 

a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal.*

 We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

* We decline to address Bey’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal. 

See Pornomo v. United States, 814 F.3d 681, 686 (4th Cir. 2016).
#### 52.215-19 Notification of Ownership Changes.

As prescribed in 15.408(k), insert the following clause:

# Notification of Ownership Changes (OCT 1997)

(a) The Contractor shall make the following notifications in writing:

(1) When the Contractor becomes aware that a change in its ownership has occurred, or is certain to occur, that could result in changes in the valuation of its capitalized assets in the accounting records, the Contractor shall notify the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) within 30 days.

(2) The Contractor shall also notify the ACO within 30 days whenever changes to asset valuations or any other cost changes have occurred or are certain to occur as a result of a change in ownership.

(b) The Contractor shall—

(1) Maintain current, accurate, and complete inventory records of assets and their costs;

(2) Provide the ACO or designated representative ready access to the records upon request;

(3) Ensure that all individual and grouped assets, their capitalized values, accumulated depreciation or amortization, and remaining useful lives are identified accurately before and after each of the Contractor's ownership changes; and

(4) Retain and continue to maintain depreciation and amortization schedules based on the asset records maintained before each Contractor ownership change.

(c) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause in all subcontracts under this contract that meet the applicability requirement of FAR 15.408(k).

(End of clause)

[62 FR 51264, Sept. 30, 1997]
#### 414.404-1 Cancellation of invitations after opening.

An acquisition official at a level above the contracting officer is authorized to make the determinations under FAR 14.404-1(c) and (e)(1).
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Reaching Youth At Risk for Substance Use and Misuse: Strategies for Early Intervention      

# Resource: Reaching Youth At Risk for Substance Use and Misuse: Strategies for Early Intervention

This resource guide (PDF, 128 pages) was compiled to address the need for comprehensive, evidence-based information to help states implement new early intervention programs or expand and improve existing ones. The document provides a set of principles of effective early intervention services; in-depth case studies of five different innovative state programs; a state-by-state description of early intervention services; and examples of programs and tools. **Learn more and download the guide (PDF, 128 pages).**
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Matthew Harris, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Woodrina Israel, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Tenant appeals from a final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jack Stoller, J.), entered on or about July 11, 2018, after a nonjury trial, awarding possession to landlord in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Final judgment (Jack Stoller, J.), entered on or about July 11, 2018, reversed, with $30 costs, and matter remanded to Civil Court for further proceedings in accordance with this decision.</p><p>Upon the July 2018 trial of this owner use holdover proceeding, Civil Court awarded possession to landlord, concluding that landlord demonstrated a "good faith intent" to occupy two reconfigured and combined brownstone buildings, one of which included the subject rent stabilized apartment, as a primary residence for his personal use. During the pendency of tenant's appeal from the judgment, New York State enacted the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (L 2019, ch 36) (HSTPA), which broadly changed the rent laws to increase tenant protections. Of relevance to this appeal, the HSTPA limited an owner's ability to recapture a rent stabilized apartment for owner occupancy (HSTPA Part I), by, inter alia, limiting an owner to the recovery of only "one dwelling unit" in a building, requiring a showing of "immediate and compelling necessity" for use by the owner as a primary residence, and further requiring an owner to offer to provide an equivalent housing accommodation to a tenant lawfully occupying the premises for "fifteen years or more" (HSTPA Part I, ยง 1). </p><p>THE HSTPA provides that these particular amendments were to "take effect immediately" and were expressly made applicable to "any tenant in possession at or after the time it takes effect" (HSTPA Part I ยง 5). "The inference to be drawn [from this language] is that if at any stage of the appeal process a tenant is lawfully in possession, he is entitled to the beneficial aspects of the statute" (<i>Matter of McMurray v New York State Div. of Hous. &amp; Community Renewal</i>, 135 AD2d 235, 239 [1988]<i>, affd</i> 72 NY2d 1022 [1988]). "[B]ecause the legislature has made changes to the law that directly impact this case, and has made those changes applicable to this pending litigation, a remand is appropriate" (<i>Dugan v London Terrace Gardens, L.P.</i>, 177 AD3d 1, 10 [2019]). Accordingly, we remand the matter to Civil Court for such further proceedings as may be necessary to determine landlord's claim in accordance with the HSTPA. <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>If that is an undesirable result, the problem is one to be addressed by the legislature.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: December 04, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
# FY 2015 MSEIP NCC

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
#### 49.602-5 Settlement agreement.

Standard Form 30 (SF 30), Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, shall be used to execute a settlement agreement (see 49.109-1).
H. J. Res. 63 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-three 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the appointment of Antoinette Bush as a citizen regent of the Board 

of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States 

(20 U.S.C. 43) the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, 

occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Steve Case 

of Virginia on April 25, 2023, is filled by the appointment of 

Antoinette Bush of the District of Columbia. The appointment is 

for a term of six years, beginning on the later of April 25, 2023, 

or the date of enactment of this joint resolution. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                         OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         (required by Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection  with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended June
30, 2003 of Central  Illinois  Public Service  Company (the  "Company") as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the "Form
10-Q"), I, Warner L. Baxter,  chief financial  officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Form 10-Q fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2003



                                        /s/ Warner L. Baxter
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Warner L. Baxter
                                        Senior Vice President, Finance
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)




A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in the  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Central Illinois Public
Service Company and will be retained by Central  Illinois Public Service Company
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.