alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sherman G. Taylor and Helen Taylor, Appellants, v. T. C. Fredrich, Assignee of Charles H. Albers, Receiver of Brookfield State Bank, and Thomas J. O’Brien, Appellees.

Gen. No. 41,313.

opinion filed January 22, 1941.

Wellman *325& Wellman, for appellants; Walter C. Wellman, of counsel; Harry A. Biossat, for appellee T. C. Fredrich.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Hebel.

“Not to be published in full.”
**Who May Apply:** (by category) Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs)

**Who May Apply:** (specifically) Academic departments and programs of IHEs that provide courses of study leading to a graduate degree may apply. Nondegree granting institutions may submit joint proposals with degree-granting IHEs.   **Students are NOT eligible to apply for this grant.**

Student Service Home

|Last Modified: 03/11/2011
|-------------------------
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner—Appellee, v. Bryan Luther THOMAS, Respondent—Appellant.

No. 07-6271.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2007.

Decided: Nov. 6, 2007.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Diana Pereira, Research and Writing Specialist, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, David Huband, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bryan Luther Thomas appeals the district court’s order of civil commitment under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2000). He contends the evidence was insufficient to support the district court’s conclusion that if released, he would pose a substantial risk of bodily injury or serious damage to the property of others. In light of the evidence presented to the district court, we conclude its finding of substantial risk is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Thomas,*No. 5:06-hc-02152-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
----

----

| CLECO      CORPORATION |  EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|------------------------|-------------------------|

|   Cleco      Corporation                |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO                    |
| 18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      |
| AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       |
| SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |

| (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Date:  May      6, 2008                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Michael      H. Madison                           |
| Michael      H. MadisonPresident      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 60 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 60

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   require the United States and the States to jointly ensure a high-
       quality education to all persons within the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2023

  Mr. DeSaulnier submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   require the United States and the States to jointly ensure a high-
       quality education to all persons within the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The United States, the States, Indian Tribes, and 
territories shall jointly ensure a high-quality education to all 
persons within the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### 52.222-2 Payment for Overtime Premiums.

As prescribed in 22.103-5(b), insert the following clause:

# Payment for Overtime Premiums (JUL 1990)

(a) The use of overtime is authorized under this contract if the overtime premium cost does not exceed *
___ or the overtime premium is paid for work—

(1) Necessary to cope with emergencies such as those resulting from accidents, natural disasters, breakdowns of production equipment, or occasional production bottlenecks of a sporadic nature;

(2) By indirect-labor employees such as those performing duties in connection with administration, protection, transportation, maintenance, standby plant protection, operation of utilities, or accounting;

(3) To perform tests, industrial processes, laboratory procedures, loading or unloading of transportation conveyances, and operations in flight or afloat that are continuous in nature and cannot reasonably be interrupted or completed otherwise; or

(4) That will result in lower overall costs to the Government.

(b) Any request for estimated overtime premiums that exceeds the amount specified above shall include all estimated overtime for contract completion and shall—

(1) Identify the work unit; e.g., department or section in which the requested overtime will be used, together with present workload, staffing, and other data of the affected unit sufficient to permit the Contracting Officer to evaluate the necessity for the overtime;

(2) Demonstrate the effect that denial of the request will have on the contract delivery or performance schedule;

(3) Identify the extent to which approval of overtime would affect the performance or payments in connection with other Government contracts, together with identification of each affected contract; and

(4) Provide reasons why the required work cannot be performed by using multishift operations or by employing additional personnel.

*Insert either “zero” or the dollar amount agreed to during negotiations.

(End of clause)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 25532, June 21, 1990; 55 FR 38518, Sept. 18, 1990]
#### 42.301 General.

When a contract is assigned for administration under Subpart 42.2, the contract administration office (CAO) shall perform contract administration functions in accordance with 48 CFR Chapter I, the contract terms, and, unless otherwise agreed to in an interagency agreement (see 42.002), the applicable regulations of the servicing agency.

[63 FR 9063, Feb. 23, 1998]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                                CLECO CORPORATION
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     AND EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                          AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                   FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          (In thousands,
                                                          except ratios)
                                                          --------------
<S>                                                       <C>           
Earnings                                                  $       55,346
Income taxes                                                      27,656
                                                          --------------

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes   $       83,002
                                                          --------------

Fixed charges:
Interest, long-term debt                                  $       23,275
Interest, other (including interest on short-term debt)            3,583
Amortization of debt expense, premium, net                         1,216
Portion of rentals representative of an interest factor              430
                                                          --------------

Total fixed charges                                       $       28,504
                                                          --------------

Earnings from continuing operations before
income taxes and fixed charges                            $      111,506
                                                          ==============
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                 3.91x
                                                          ==============
Fixed charges from above                                  $       28,504
Preferred stock dividends*                                         2,809
                                                          --------------

Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends         $       31,313
                                                          ==============

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends                                          2.68x
                                                          ==============
</TABLE>


*  Preferred stock dividends multiplied by the ratio of pretax
   income to net income.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 102 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 102

Providing for congressional disapproval of the issuance of a license to 
    export with respect to the proposed export of defense articles, 
  including technical data, and defense services to the Government of 
                                Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2023

 Ms. Omar (for herself, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Bush, Mrs. Ramirez, and Ms. Lee 
 of Pennsylvania) submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the issuance of a license to 
    export with respect to the proposed export of defense articles, 
  including technical data, and defense services to the Government of 
                                Israel.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a license 
to export with respect to the following proposed export to the 
Government of Israel is hereby prohibited:
            (1) The transfer to Israel of the following defense 
        articles, including technical data and defense services, 
        described in the certification Transmittal No. DDTC 23-023, 
        sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
        chairmen of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 
        and the Committee of Foreign Affairs of the House of 
        Representatives pursuant to subsection (c) of section 36 of the 
        Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776) on October 31, 2023: 
        defense articles, including technical data, and defense 
        services to support procurement, inspection, assembly, testing, 
        and shipment of Spice Family Gliding Bomb Assemblies for end-
        use by the Ministry of Defense for Israel.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31-2



Certification

I, Kenneth M. Jasinski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Energy East Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  November 4, 2004 | /s/Kenneth M. Jasinski       Kenneth M. Jasinski
       Executive Vice President
         and Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### 52.208-1-52.208-3 [Reserved]
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
US Airways Group, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration 
statement nos. 2-98828, 33-26762, 33-39896, 33-44835, 33-60618,  
33-60620 and 333-62029 on Form S-8 and the registration statement 
nos. 33-41821 and 33-50231 on Form S-3 of US Airways Group, Inc. 
of our report dated February 24, 1999, relating to the 
consolidated balance sheets of US Airways Group, Inc. and 
subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, 
and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash 
flows, and changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) for each of 
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1998 which 
appear in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of the 
Company and US Airways, Inc.


                                                       KPMG LLP


Washington, D.C.
March 19, 1999
#### 401.105-2 Arrangement of regulations.

AGAR coverage parallels the FAR in format, arrangement, and numbering system. However, subdivisions below the section and subsection levels may not always correlate directly to FAR designated paragraphs and subparagraphs.
______________ THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PR ECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Timothy Dion Rogers, Respondent,

v.

State of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2011-182846

ON WRI T OF CERTIORARI

Appeal From Dorchester County

Diane Schafer Goodstein , Post-Conviction Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2013-MO-026 Submitted September 16, 2013 – Filed September 25, 2013

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka and Senior Assistant Attorney General W illiam Edgar Salter, III, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Diana L. Holt, of Columbia, for Respondent.PER CURIAM: We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the grant of Respondent's applica tion for post-conviction relief (PCR). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEAT TY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ.,

concur.
#### 411.600 Scope of subpart.

The Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS) excludes USDA activities (see 15 CFR 700.18(b)). USDA Contracting Officers are not authorized to place rated orders under DPAS.
hltk_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1

 

 


	 
	1

	


	 



 

 


	 
	2

	


	 



 

 


	 
	3

	


	 



 

 


	 
	4

	


	 



 

 


	 
	5

	


	 



 

 

 

 


	
6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated statement of income and condensed consolidated balance
sheet and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     56,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,734
<PP&E>                                         418,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                 247,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,146
<BONDS>                                         64,246
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,537
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,859
<SALES>                                        369,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               369,217
<CGS>                                          266,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  266,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,714
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,418
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,418
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92


</TABLE>
515.204 Contract format. ( a ) The uniform contract format is not required for leases of real property (See GSAM 570.116).
( b ) The Senior Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of granting exemptions to the use of the Uniform Contract Format (see FAR 15.204(e)).
[81 FR 36425, June 6, 2016]
#### 52.210-1 Market Research.

As prescribed in 10.003, insert the following clause:

# Market Research (NOV 2021)

(a) *Definition.* As used in this clause—

*Commercial product, commercial service,* and *nondevelopmental item* have the meaning contained in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 2.101.

(b) Before awarding subcontracts for other than commercial acquisitions, where the subcontracts are over the simplified acquisition threshold, as defined in FAR 2.101 on the date of subcontract award, the Contractor shall conduct market research to—

(1) Determine if commercial products, commercial services, or, to the extent commercial products suitable to meet the agency's needs are not available, nondevelopmental items are available that—

(i) Meet the agency's requirements;

(ii) Could be modified to meet the agency's requirements; or

(iii) Could meet the agency's requirements if those requirements were modified to a reasonable extent; and

(2) Determine the extent to which commercial products, commercial services, or nondevelopmental items could be incorporated at the component level.

(End of clause)

[76 FR 14565, Mar. 16, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 27092, May 6, 2020; 86 FR 61032, Nov. 4, 2021]
332.501-2 Unusual progress payments. ( a ) ( 3 ) The HCA (non-delegable) shall approve unusual progress payments.