alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
#### 3.806 Processing suspected violations.

The contracting officer shall report suspected violations of the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 1352 in accordance with agency procedures.

[72 FR 46330, Aug. 17, 2007]
42.1701 Procedures. ( a ) Negotiation of forward pricing rate agreements (FPRA's) may be requested by the contracting officer or the contractor or initiated by the administrative contracting officer (ACO). In determining whether or not to establish such an agreement, the ACO should consider whether the benefits to be derived from the agreement are commensurate with the effort of establishing and monitoring it. Normally, FPRA's should be negotiated only with contractors having a significant volume of Government contract proposals. The cognizant contract administration agency shall determine whether an FPRA will be established.
( b ) The ACO shall obtain the contractor's forward pricing rate proposal and require that it include cost or pricing data that are accurate, complete, and current as of the date of submission (but see 15.407-3(c)). The ACO shall invite the cognizant contract auditor and contracting offices having a significant interest to participate in developing a Government objective and in the negotiations. Upon completing negotiations, the ACO shall prepare a price negotiation memorandum (PNM) (see 15.406-3) and forward copies of the PNM and FPRA to the cognizant auditor and to all contracting offices that are known to be affected by the FPRA.
( c ) The FPRA shall provide specific terms and conditions covering expiration, application, and data requirements for systematic monitoring to ensure the validity of the rates. The agreement shall provide for cancellation at the option of either party and shall require the contractor to submit to the ACO and to the cognizant contract auditor any significant change in cost or pricing data used to support the FPRA.
( d ) When an FPRA is invalid, the contractor should submit and negotiate a new proposal to reflect the changed conditions. If an FPRA has not been established or has been invalidated, the ACO will issue a forward pricing rate recommendation (FPRR) to buying activities with documentation to assist negotiators. In the absence of an FPRA or FPRR, the ACO shall include support for rates utilized.
( e ) The ACO may negotiate continuous updates to the FPRA. The FPRA will provide specific terms and conditions covering notification, application, and data requirements for systematic monitoring to ensure the validity of the rates.
[62 FR 51258, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 53149, Aug. 30, 2010]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION 

October 30, 2016

Denise Juneau

Montana Office of Public Instruction

P.O. Box 202501

Helena, MT 59620-2501 

Dear Denise Juneau: 

On May 16-18, 2016, a team from the U.S. Department of Education (ED) (the Department) conducted 

an onsite monitoring of the Montana Office of Public Instruction’s (OPI) implementation of its approved 

Preschool Development Grant (PDG). This monitoring aims to continue the collaborative relationship 

that began at the grant award and development of the scope of work. It provides the Department with a 

deeper understanding of each State’s overall performance; the successes, challenges, and strategies for 

the implementation of its plans for its PDG Development grant; and the fiscal management of the grant 

funds. It also helps us tailor technical assistance to each State’s specific needs.

The site visit included presentations and discussions related to all projects in the approved scope of 

work, including grants management, high-quality preschool programs, early learning standards, 

comprehensive services, workforce development, and sustainability. During the visit, ED project 

officers visited the Montana Office of Public Instruction and several Preschool classrooms located in 

three high-need communities: Rocky Mountain Development Center Head Start, Great Falls School 

District and Blackfeet Early Childhood Center. 

Enclosed is a summary report based upon this review. The report includes highlights of Montana’s 

implementation of PDG and a snapshot of Montana’s progress under each PDG key area. This report 

will be posted on the PDG website. The report includes “next steps” to ensure that Montana implements 

PDG consistent with its approved application, scope of work, and timelines identified in its project 

plans.

We want to thank you and your staff for your cooperation and hospitality during the site visit, and for 

your efforts in providing high quality preschool opportunities through the Preschool Development 

Grant. As we have discussed and as detailed further in this report, Montana is receiving a corrective 

action report as a result of the visit. As such, a written response to the corrective action is expected by 

November 30, 2016. We hope you will continue to communicate any needs or concerns to your ED 

project officer(s). 
Page 2

54076.1

We look forward to continuing our work with you and supporting Montana’s technical assistance needs 

to ensure successful implementation of PDG. Thank you for your commitment to Montana’s youngest 

children.

Sincerely,

/s/

Libby Doggett

Deputy Assistant Secretary 

Office of Early Learning

Office of Elementary and Secondary Education

U.S. Department of Education

Enclosure
# C_2018097EN.01000801.xml

| 15.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/8 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------ |

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2018/C 97/04)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| | ADMINISTRATORS IN THE FIELD OF PUBLIC HEALTH (AD 6):
EPSO/AD/340/18 — Health and food safety — audit, inspection and evaluation EPSO/AD/341/18 — Food safety — policy and legislation | | EPSO/AD/340/18 — Health and food safety — audit, inspection and evaluation | | EPSO/AD/341/18 — Food safety — policy and legislation |
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| | EPSO/AD/340/18 — Health and food safety — audit, inspection and evaluation | | | | |
| | EPSO/AD/341/18 — Food safety — policy and legislation | | | | |

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal of the European Union C 97 A of 15 March 2018.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
Abstract

Responding to the Postsecondary Student Success Program Absolute Priority 1, 

California State University, Fullerton (CSUF) aims to develop, implement, and test the 

feasibility of the program, Fullerton RISES: Re-imagining Success for Every Student, that 

demonstrates a rationale utilizing evidence-based strategies that prior research suggest is likely to 

improve student retention and degree completion outcomes, especially for underserved students. 

It also responds to the Competitive Preference Priority to improve student outcomes for 

underserved students by using data to continually assess and improve the effectiveness of funded 

activities and sustain a data-driven continuous improvement process at the institution after the 

grant period. Fullerton RISES’ interventions target students who are on academic notice (AcaN, 

GPA lower than 2.0) and academically at-risk (AR, GPA between 2.0 and 2.5), which will 

contribute to closing equity gaps due to the disproportionate number of first-generation, 

underrepresented minority (URM) college students on academic notice or at risk. Project 

Activities include (1) Proactive and relational 1:1 advising to co-create a success plan with 

SMART goals, (2) RISES Academy that provides supplemental holistic academic and nonacademic support and skills-building, (3) Incentives addressing barriers, including priority 

registration and extended time to improve grades before disqualification, and (4) Advising 

training and professional development. The intended outcomes include (1) improving retention 

and graduation rates and (2) narrowing URM and the first-generation retention and graduation 

equity gap. Performance will be measured by the number and percentage of AcaN/AR students 

served by the grant, changes in academic self-efficacy and sense of belonging, course success 

(GPA, credits accumulated), retention, graduation rates, and other quantitative and qualitative 

data.
247.206 Preparation of solicitations and contracts. Consistent with FAR 15.304 and 215.304, consider using the following as evaluation factors or subfactors: ( 1 ) Record of claims involving loss or damage; and
( 2 ) Commitment of transportation assets to readiness support (*e.g.,* Civil Reserve Air Fleet and Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement).
[75 FR 51417, Aug. 20, 2010]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  The national parks, index

2009-2011,2012-2016

 
SuDocs: I 29.103:���������
�Item Number:0648-G(online)
CGP system Number:000716823
# C_2020377EN.01001201.xml

| 9.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/12

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2020/C 377/09)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Slovakia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Slovakia

Subject of commemoration: 20th anniversary of Slovakia’s accession to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

Description of the design: The upper right half of the national side design depicts a representation of the concept of digital humanism: printed circuits in the shape of a human brain, in the centre of which is a circle representing a microprocessor. The Slovak coat of arms is placed next to the lower right edge. Inscribed inside a square outline that partly overlaps the main image are the words ‘20. VÝROČIE’ and ‘VSTUP SR DO OECD’ (the 20th anniversary of Slovakia’s accession to the OECD). Below the square is the name of the issuing country ‘SLOVENSKO’ and the year of issuance ‘2020’, one above the other. Between the square and the left edge of the design is the mint mark of the Kremnica Mint (Mincovňa Kremnica), consisting of the letters ‘MK’ placed between two dies. Below the mint mark are the stylised letters ‘PV’ referring to the designer Peter Valach.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 1 000 000

Date of issue: November 2020

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
---

Exhibit 12(b)

CLECO POWER
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(UNAUDITED)

|                                                        | For the
three
months
ended | For the
twelve
months
ended
|------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ---------------------------
|                                                        | March 31, 2002            
|                                                        | (Thousands, except ratios)
|                                                        |                            |                            
|Earnings from continuing operations                     | $  14,097                  | $   64,411                 
|Income taxes                                            | 7,925                      | 34,765                     
|                                                        |                            |                            
|Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | $  22,022                  | $   99,176                 
|                                                        | ======                     | =======                    
|Fixed charges:                                          |                            |                            
|Interest, long-term debt                                | $    5,980                 | $   23,586                 
|Interest, other (including interest on short-term debt) | 554                        | 2,763                      
|Amortization of debt expense, premium, net              | 206                        | 860                        
|Portion of rentals representative of an interest factor | 154                        | 518                        
|                                                        |                            |                            
|Total fixed charges                                     | $    6,894                 | $   27,727                 
|                                                        | ======                     | =======                    
|                                                        |                            |                            
|Earnings from continuing operations before              |                            |                            
|income taxes and fixed charges                          | $  28,916                  | $ 126,903                  
|                                                        | ======                     | =======                    
|                                                        |                            |                            
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      | 4.19 x                     | 4.58 x                     
|                                                        | ======                     | =======                    
|                                                        |                            |                            

51

---
#### Nassau-Suffolk Pet Supply, Inc., Respondent, v. Ernest Ashdown, Doing Business as Hempstead Agency, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages arising from the defendant insurance agent’s alleged failure to renew certain fire insurance policies covering plaintiff’s premises upon which a fire occurred after expiration of the policies, the defendant, by permission of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, appeals from an order of that court, made March 23, 1964, which affirmed a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, entered October 15, 1963, after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. Order of the Appellate Term reversed on the law and on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to defendant to abide the event. In our opinion, defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence should have been granted and a new trial ordered. It is the duty of the trial court to maintain a *“*‘ reasonable consistency between the weight of evidence and the verdict reached’” *(Cook*v. *Lewis,*285 App. Div. 1201, 1202; *Mann*v. *Hunt,*283 App. Div. 140, 142). Where the trial court is of the opinion, as it was here, that in weighing the evidence the jury has not appraised correctly its relative persuasiveness and probative force, the court is empowered to set aside the jury’s verdict and to order a new trial *892
      *(Blum*v. *Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.,*292 N. Y. 241, 245). In view of the proof in this record, we think that power should have been exercised. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
# C_2020271EN.01000101.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2020/C 271/01)

Last publication

OJ C 262, 10.8.2020

Past publications

OJ C 255, 3.8.2020

OJ C 247, 27.7.2020

OJ C 240, 20.7.2020

OJ C 230, 13.7.2020

OJ C 222, 6.7.2020

OJ C 215, 29.6.2020

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


With respect to the Quarterly Report of Central Natural Resources,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
L. Noah, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Ssection 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

Dated:   August 14, 2003


/s/ Leonard L. Noah
___________________
Leonard L. Noah
Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------------ Application of : : BALTIA AIR LINES, INC. (BALTIA) : : DOCKET DOT-OST-2007-0007 Extend Certificate of Public Convenience : and Necessity : : Section 41102 Certificate Authority : : : (New York-St. Petersburg) :

------------------------------------------------------------------

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED UNDER §302.12

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: Igor Dmitrowsky President & CEO BALTIA AIR LINES, INC. 63-25 Saunders Street, Suite 7I Rego Park, New York 11374 Steffanie J. Lewis General Counsel Baltia Air Lines, Inc. THE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW FIRM, PC 1915 Eye Street, NW, Suite 500 Telephone: 202 296 1111 Facsimile: 202 296 1175 Email: slewis@iblf.com

March 14, 2011DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------- Application of : : BALTIA AIR LINES, INC. (BALTIA) : : DOCKET DOT-OST-2007-0007 Extend Certificate of Public Convenience : and Necessity : : Section 41102 Certificate Authority :
: (New York-St. Petersburg) :

-------------------------------------------

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED UNDER §302.12 Pursuant to 14 CFR 302.12 Baltia Air Lines, Inc. (“Baltia”) requests that the information identified on the attached Index and which is sealed in the attached envelope be withheld from public disclosure. This Rule adopts the following standards of disclosure found in the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. §552). Information may be withheld from disclosure if it is (1) commercial or financial, (2) obtained from a person outside the government, and (3) privileged or confidential. The information Baltia has redacted and seeks to withhold: 1. Baltia’s account number and bar codes of such numbers listed on attached bank letter of March 10, 2011. The account number is financial and commercial, is not obtained from the government and is confidential as to the bank and the Company. Baltia respectfully requests that the confidential account numbers remain so and this motion be granted. ___/s/________________ Steffanie J. Lewis General Counsel Baltia Air Lines, Inc.Table of Documents from which Information has been Redacted

DOC # DOCUMENT PAGES 11 HSBC Letter by V. P. And Branch Manager dated March 10, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Service by email has been made this date to the following.
jeffrey.manley@united.com; carl.nelson@aa.com; howard_kass@usairways.com; rbkeiner@crowell.com; nssparks@fedex.com; recohn@hhlaw.com; prrizzi@hhlaw.com; msinick@ssd.com; hkamen@coair.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; dvaughan@kelleydrye.com; rpommer@atlasair.com; ben.graves@evergreenaviation.com; daniel.commins@evergreenaviation.com; sametta.c.barnett@delta.com; scott.mcclain@delta.com; Mark.treadaway@mwaa.com; donald.fields@mwaa.com; sbrocchi@panynj.gov; john.krepp@faa.gov

__________/S/__________________________ Steffanie J. Lewis March 14, 2011