alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32(iv)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Penns WoodsBancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,2004 Amendment No. 2 to as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian L. Knepp, Vice President of Finance,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Brian L. Knepp                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian L. Knepp  Principal Accounting Officer |
|                                         |
| August 25, 2005                              |

 

----
514.203-1 Transmittal to prospective bidders. Prospective bidders, as used in FAR 14.203-1, include both the following: ( a ) The incumbent contractor, except when its written response to the notice of contract action under FAR subpart 5.2 states a negative interest.
( b ) Bidders that responded to recent solicitations for the same or similar items.
# C_2021236EN.01000301.xml

| 18.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 June 2021

(2021/C 236/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1937 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85525 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1905 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0925 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1973 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,510 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 354,30 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5375 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9243 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,3103 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5763 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4718 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2694 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7025 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6000 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 354,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8057 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6877 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4950 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 266,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9419 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,842 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,4188 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,482 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0286 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,4406 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,4810 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1937

JPY

Japanese yen

132,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85525

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1905

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0925

ISK

Iceland króna

146,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1973

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,510

HUF

Hungarian forint

354,30

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5375

RON

Romanian leu

4,9243

TRY

Turkish lira

10,3103

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5763

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4718

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2694

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7025

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6000

KRW

South Korean won

1 354,06

ZAR

South African rand

16,8057

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6877

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4950

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 266,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9419

PHP

Philippine peso

57,842

RUB

Russian rouble

86,4188

THB

Thai baht

37,482

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0286

MXN

Mexican peso

24,4406

INR

Indian rupee

88,4810

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Effectiveness of Mental Health Literacy Programs in Primary and Secondary Schools      

# Resource: Effectiveness of Mental Health Literacy Programs in Primary and Secondary Schools

This resource provides a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of mental health literacy interventions in schools, from 2013 to the present, on mental health knowledge, stigma, and help-seeking. Researchers found that these programs increase knowledge but did not see a difference in reducing stigma. **Learn more.**
#### 49.305 Adjustment of fee.
2415.305 Proposal evaluation. ( a ) After receipt of proposals, the Contracting Officer will forward copies of the technical portion of each proposal to the TEP Chairperson or his or her designee. The cost/price portion of each proposal shall be retained by the Contracting Officer pending initial technical evaluation by the TEP. ( 3 ) *Technical evaluation when tradeoffs are performed.* The TEP shall rate each proposal based on the evaluation factors specified in the solicitation. The TEP shall identify each proposal as being acceptable, unacceptable but capable of being made acceptable, or unacceptable. A proposal shall be considered unacceptable if it is so clearly deficient that it cannot be corrected through written or oral discussions. Under the tradeoff process, predetermined threshold levels of technical acceptability for proposals shall not be employed. A technical evaluation report, which complies with FAR 15.305(a)(3), shall be prepared and signed by the technical evaluators, furnished to the Contracting Officer, and maintained as a permanent record in the official procurement file.
[50 FR 46577, Nov. 8, 1985, as amended at 57 FR 59789, Dec. 15, 1992; 60 FR 46156, Sept. 5, 1995; 61 FR 19471, May 1, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 46096, Aug. 23, 1999; 77 FR 73527, Dec. 10, 2012; 81 FR 13751, Mar. 15, 2016]
NO. 62845 and 62845A

HAVEN CHAPEL UNITED § IN THE DISTRICT COURT METHODIST CHURCH § § VS. § OF BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS § WILLIAM MICHAEL LEEBRON II § E.J. KING AND BRAZORIA § COUNTY COMMISSIONER’S COURT § 149th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE OF APPEAL
COMES NOW, HAVEN CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH and files this Notice of Appeal in the above entitled and numbered cause. Appellant appeals the 149 th Judicial District Court of, Brazoria County, Texas. 1. The cause appealed from Haven Chapel United Methodist Church vs. William Michael Leebron II, E.J.King, County Judge and Brazoria County Commissioner’s Court; Cause No. 62845 and 62845Ain the 149 th Judicial Court of Brazoria County, Texas. 2. The date of the judgment appealed from: March 30, 2015 and June 17, 2015. 3. Plaintiff desires to appeal. 4. The appeal was previously docketed in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas as Cause No. 14-15-00397-CV. Said appeal was dismissed because same was interlocutory or that the filing fee had not been paid. A Motion to Reinstate has been filed in said cause. 5. The name of the party filing the notice are Haven Chapel United Methodist Church. 6. The appeal is not an accelerated appeal. 7. The appeal is not a restricted appeal.

Respectfully submitted, ACCEPTED 14-15-00629-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/26/2015 5:55:59 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK/ s / V e ronic aL . D a v is
V e ronic a L . D a v is S .B .T. # 05557300 226 N . M a tts on W e s t Columbia , Te xa s 77486 (979) 345- 2953 v ld57a ta l@ ya h o o.c om

CERTI F I CA TE O FS ERV I C E
Ihe re by c e rtify tha t a true a nd c orre c t c o py of the abov e a nd fore g oingha s be en s e nt to B ra z oriaCounty

D is tric t Attorne y ’ s O ffic e a t 111 E. L oc us t, 4 th F loor, A ng le otn, Te xa s 77515 on this the 17 th da y

of J ulyl, 2015 v ia e filinga nd Rus s B rig g s a t 1150 B is s onne tt H ous to, Te xa s 77005 by e filing

. / s / V e ronic aL . D a v is

_________________________________ V e ronic a L . D a v is
# C_2021189EN.01000101.xml

| 17.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 189/01)

Last publication

OJ C 182, 10.5.2021

OJ C 180, 10.5.2021

Past publications

OJ C 163, 3.5.2021

OJ C 148, 26.4.2021

OJ C 138, 19.4.2021

OJ C 128, 12.4.2021

OJ C 110, 29.3.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### WHITSON, Appellant, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Fannie Whitson, as administratrix, against the mayor, etc., of New York.

H. W. Unger, for appellant.

C. Mellen, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JACOB ALLEN YOCKEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 171 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
35.001 Definitions. *Applied research* means the effort that ( a ) normally follows basic research, but may not be severable from the related basic research;
( b ) attempts to determine and exploit the potential of scientific discoveries or improvements in technology, materials, processes, methods, devices, or techniques; and
( c ) attempts to advance the state of the art. When being used by contractors in cost principle applications, this term does not include efforts whose principal aim is the design, development, or testing of specific items or services to be considered for sale; these efforts are within the definition of *development,* given below.
*Development,* as used in this part, means the systematic use of scientific and technical knowledge in the design, development, testing, or evaluation of a potential new product or service (or of an improvement in an existing product or service) to meet specific performance requirements or objectives. It includes the functions of design engineering, prototyping, and engineering testing; it excludes subcontracted technical effort that is for the sole purpose of developing an additional source for an existing product.
*Recoupment,* as used in this part, means the recovery by the Government of Government-funded nonrecurring costs from contractors that sell, lease, or license the resulting products or technology to buyers other than the Federal Government.
[48 FR 42352, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 27467, July 20, 1988; 55 FR 3884, Feb. 5, 1990; 66 FR 2132, Jan. 10, 2001]
#### 39.202 Definition.

*Undue burden,* as used in this subpart, means a significant difficulty or expense.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edward C. LEGGETT, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-6317.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 15, 2007.

Decided: Nov. 7, 2007.

Edward C. Leggett, Appellant pro se. Lisa Rae McKeel, Office of The United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*273PER CURIAM:

Edward C. Leggett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Leggett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02965]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Permanent Closure

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration received written notice 
from the Alaska Department of Transportation (AKDOT) advising that 
infrastructure associated with Klawock, Alaska Seaplane Base (AQC) is 
permanently closed.

DATES: The permanent closure of the seaplane base is retroactively 
effective.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Molly Fierro, Compliance Manager, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Alaskan Region Airports District 
Office, 222 W 7th Avenue, Anchorage, AK 99513. Telephone Number: (907) 
271-5439/FAX Number: (907) 271-2851.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Ownership of infrastructure associated with 
AQC was transferred to the City of Klawock in 2003. Subsequent to the 
ownership transfer, the seaplane dock became unfeasible to utilize and 
was removed. The FAA hereby retroactively publishes the AKDOTs and City 
of Klawock's notice of permanent closure of the Klawock Seaplane Base 
(AQC) in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 46319(b).

    Issued in Anchorage, Alaska, on February 9, 2021.
Kristi A. Warden,
Director, Airports Division, FAA, Alaskan Region.
[FR Doc. 2021-02965 Filed 2-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,763,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,498,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,576,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,672,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,473,902
<PP&E>                                      47,480,758
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,604,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,780,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,154,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,713,913
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,612,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,780,446
<SALES>                                     31,632,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,632,526
<CGS>                                       22,999,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,999,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,829,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               228,562
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             235,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                420,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                   168,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            251,952
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   251,952
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 212 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement 

Network relating to ‘‘Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Residential 

Real Estate Transfers’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 18, 2024 

Mr. PALMER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network relating to 

‘‘Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Residential 

Real Estate Transfers’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fi4 nancial Crimes Enforcement Network relating to ‘‘Anti5 Money Laundering Regulations for Residential Real EsVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:38 Oct 19, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ212.IH HJ212

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 212 IH 

1 tate Transfers’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 70258 (August 29, 2024)), 

2 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 62 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 62

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43) the vacancy

              

 on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class 
other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration 
of the term of Michael Govan of California on May 6, 2023, is filled by 
the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 
six years, beginning on the later of May 6, 2023, or the date of 
enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 62

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
| 1.   | The      Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended October 31,      2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     | /s/ Denis A. Krusos       |   |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                                     | Denis A. Krusos           |   |
|                                     | Chairman of the Board and |   |
| January 29, 2010     | Chief Executive Officer   |   |
#### Valda W. King, Respondent, v. Frank S. King, Appellant.

In an action by a wife for a judicial separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 15, 1964, which: (1) awarded to the wife $35 a week as alimony *pendente Ute*and a counsel fee of $350; and (2) referred the matter of an additional counsel fee to the trial court for determination. Order affirmed, without costs (see *Goldberg*v. *Goldberg,*4 A D 2d 884). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.