alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1256

BENITO SANCHEZ-GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: October 8, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arturo H. Hernandez, Sterling, Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart 

F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Nancy Friedman, Senior 

Litigation Counsel, Margaret A. O’Donnell, Office of Immigration 

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Benito Sanchez-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration 

judge’s denial of his requests for cancellation of removal and 

voluntary departure. We have reviewed the administrative record 

and the Board’s order and find no error in the Board’s 

conclusion that Sanchez-Garcia is statutorily ineligible for 

both forms of relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(c) (2012) (providing 

that an alien shall not be permitted to “depart voluntarily 

. . . if the alien was previously permitted to so depart after 

having been found inadmissible under [8 U.S.C. §] 1182(a)(6)(A) 

[2012]); Garcia v. Holder, 732 F.3d 308 (4th Cir. 2013) (holding 

that Board’s ruling that alien’s continuous physical presence 

terminated when he voluntarily departed country was a reasonable 

interpretation of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b (2012)).

We therefore deny the petition for review for the 

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Sanchez-Garcia (B.I.A. 

Feb. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 10.13
[CopyTele Logo]
                                January 11, 2002



Futaba Corporation
629 Oshiba, Mobara-shi
Chiba-ken
297-8588, Japan

Attention:  Mr. Hiroaki Kawasaki

Dear Mr. Kawasaki:

                  CopyTele, Inc. and Futaba Corporation are parties to a Joint
Cooperation Agreement for Field Emission Displays, dated as of June 13, 2001
(the "Agreement"), for the development and commercialization of Field Emission
Display modules.

                  This is to confirm that Futaba will pay to CopyTele, within
ten days of the date of this letter agreement, the sum of $3 million as part of
the compensation payable by Futaba pursuant to Section 6.2 of the Agreement.

                  Pursuant to Section 1.8 of the Agreement, Futaba hereby adds
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Center of Advanced Field Emission as
its Associate under the Agreement.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   COPYTELE, INC.



                                    By:    /s/ Denis A. Krusos
                                         -------------------------------------
                                               Denis A. Krusos

                                    Title:  Chairman and C.E.O.
                                            ----------------------------------

Accepted and Agreed to:
FUTABA CORPORATION


By:    /s/ Hiroaki Kawasaki
     ---------------------------------------
           Hiroaki Kawasaki

Title:  Managing Director
        ------------------------------------

                              [CopyTele Letterhead]
# C_2017226EN.01000401.xml

| 14.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 July 2017

(2017/C 226/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1417 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4367 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88215 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5430 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1011 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4518 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,120 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,27 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2332 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5635 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0763 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4770 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4564 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9167 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5578 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5722 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 298,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0961 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7443 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4050 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 238,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9093 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,720 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,4750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,761 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6733 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3212 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,5825 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1417

JPY

Japanese yen

129,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4367

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88215

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5430

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1011

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4518

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,120

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,27

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2332

RON

Romanian leu

4,5635

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0763

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4770

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4564

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9167

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5578

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5722

KRW

South Korean won

1 298,70

ZAR

South African rand

15,0961

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7443

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4050

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 238,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9093

PHP

Philippine peso

57,720

RUB

Russian rouble

68,4750

THB

Thai baht

38,761

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6733

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3212

INR

Indian rupee

73,5825

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2018240EN.01000101.xml

| 9.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 240/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 231, 2.7.2018

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 221, 25.6.2018

OJ C 211, 18.6.2018

OJ C 200, 11.6.2018

OJ C 190, 4.6.2018

OJ C 182, 28.5.2018

OJ C 166, 14.5.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### Julius Blumenthal and Max Zimmerman, copartners, trading as Blumenthal & Company, appellees, v. Louis A. Grodsky, trading as Louis Style Shop, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,983.

Action for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Daniel P. Trude, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1926.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed October 5, 1926.

Rehearing denied October 18, 1926.

Morris K. Levinson, for appellant.

Golden & Kagan, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
# C_2021263EN.01000101.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 263/01)

Last publication

OJ C 252, 28.6.2021

Past publications

OJ C 242, 21.6.2021

OJ C 228, 14.6.2021

OJ C 217, 7.6.2021

OJ C 206, 31.5.2021

OJ C 189, 17.5.2021

OJ C 182, 10.5.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
236.609-70 Additional provision. Use the provision at 252.236-7011, Overseas Architect-Engineer Services—Restriction to United States Firms, in solicitations for architect-engineer contracts that are— ( 1 ) Funded with military construction appropriations;
( 2 ) Estimated to exceed $500,000; and
( 3 ) To be performed in Japan, in any North Atlantic Treaty Organization member country, or in countries bordering the Arabian Gulf.
[56 FR 36421, July 31, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 2858, Jan. 17, 1997; 63 FR 11539, Mar. 9, 1998; 76 FR 58156, Sept. 20, 2011; 79 FR 44316, July 31, 2014; 80 FR 15911, Mar. 26, 2015; 83 FR 54681, Oct. 31, 2018]
EXHIBIT 23.1

       Consent of Beard Miller Company LLP, Independent Registered Public
                                Accounting Firm




Regarding:

Registration  Statements,  File No. 33-15150, No. 333-55610,  No. 333-57121, No.
333-37232, No. 333-37236, and No. 333-106701.


     We  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  above  listed
Registration  Statements of our report dated March 7, 2005,  with respect to the
consolidated financial statements,  management's  assessment of internal control
over  financial  reporting,  and the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over
financial  reporting for Community  Banks,  Inc.  included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.



                                                  /s/ BEARD MILLER COMPANY LLP



Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 7, 2005
#### 436.575 Maximum workweek-construction schedule.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.236-75, Maximum Workweek-Construction Schedule, if the clause at FAR 52.236-15 is used and the contractor's work schedule is restricted by access to the facility or must be coordinated with the schedule of contract administration personnel.

[63 FR 26996, May 15, 1998]
#### 27.401 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Data* means recorded information, regardless of form or the media on which it may be recorded. The term includes technical data and computer software. The term does not include information incidental to contract administration, such as financial, administrative, cost or pricing, or management information.

*Form, fit, and function data* means data relating to items, components, or processes that are sufficient to enable physical and functional interchangeability, and data identifying source, size, configuration, mating and attachment characteristics, functional characteristics, and performance requirements. For computer software it means data identifying source, functional characteristics, and performance requirements, but specifically excludes the source code, algorithms, processes, formulas, and flow charts of the software.

*Limited rights* means the rights of the Government in limited rights data as set forth in a Limited Rights Notice.

*Limited rights data* means data, other than computer software, that embody trade secrets or are commercial or financial and confidential or privileged, to the extent that such data pertain to items, components, or processes developed at private expense, including minor modifications. (Agencies may, however, adopt the following alternate definition: Limited rights data means data (other than computer software) developed at private expense that embody trade secrets or are commercial or financial and confidential or privileged (see 27.404-2(b)).

*Restricted computer software* means computer software developed at private expense and that is a trade secret, is commercial or financial and confidential or privileged, or is copyrighted computer software, including minor modifications of the computer software.

*Restricted rights* means the rights of the Government in restricted computer software as set forth in a Restricted Rights Notice.

*Unlimited rights* means the rights of the Government to use, disclose, reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, in any manner and for any purpose, and to have or permit others to do so.
#### In the Matter of Burton Horowitz, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

May 28, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr.,*for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on December 21, 1960 under the name of Burton R. Horowitz.

On August 11, 1978 the respondent was convicted, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, upon a verdict, of violating sections 1622 and 2 of title *5718 of the United States Code, in that he, with others, unlawfully, willfully and knowingly procured a witness to commit perjury while testifying under oath at a hearing before the National Labor Relations Board. The respondent was sentenced to imprisonment on August 11, 1978 for a period of one year, sentence to commence on September 6, 1978.

Subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law provides that "[a]ny person being an attorney and counselor-at-law, who shall be convicted of a felony, shall, upon such conviction, cease to be an attorney and counselor-at-law, or to be competent to practice law as such.” In New York "felony” is defined as "an offense for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year may be imposed” (Penal Law, § 10.00, subd 5). Subdivision (1) of section 1 of title 18 of the United States Code provides: "Any offense punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year is a felony.” Section 1622 of title 18 authorizes imprisonment for a term of not more than five years and/or a fine of up to $2,000.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The clerk of this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith by reason of said conviction (see *Matter of Chu,*42 NY2d 490; *Matter of Thies,*45 NY2d 865).

Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
**Predominantly Black Institutions (PBI) Program Formula Grants**

**FY 2023 New Awards**
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

                  - NAME:
                  - **Tina Diamond**
                  - MAIL:
                  - U.S. Department of Education, OSERS400 Maryland Ave., SW, 5th Floor, PCPWashington, DC 20202-2600
                  - EMAIL:
                  - Christina.Diamond@ed.gov
                  - PHONE: 
                  - 202-245-6723
                  - TDD:
                  - If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
4.1704 Contracting officer responsibilities. ( a ) For other than indefinite-delivery contracts, the contracting officer shall ensure that 52.204-14, Service Reporting Requirement, is included in solicitations, contracts, and orders as prescribed at 4.1705. For indefinite-delivery contracts, the contracting officer who awarded the contract shall ensure that 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts, is included in solicitations and contracts as prescribed at 4.1705. The contracting officer at the order level shall verify the clause's inclusion in the contract.
( b ) If the contractor fails to submit a report in a timely manner, the contracting officer shall exercise appropriate contractual remedies. In addition, the contracting officer shall make the contractor's failure to comply with the reporting requirements a part of the contractor's performance information under subpart 42.15.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00219-CV

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga 

Operations, LLC, and Audi of America, LLC, Appellants

v.

State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Appellees

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-16-000370, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

The parties have filed a joint status update and motion to continue abatement of 

appeal pending documentation of a settlement-in-principle. We grant the motion and continue 

the abatement of the appeal. The parties are ordered to file either a motion to dismiss or another

status update no later than December 29, 2023. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of 

the appeal.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Abated

Filed: October 6, 2023
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           National Youth Justice Awareness Month, 2015      

# National Youth Justice Awareness Month, 2015

**Dates:** October 1-31, 2015National Youth Justice Month, 2015 is an opportunity to reinvigorate efforts to prevent youth from entering the juvenile justice system and promote diverse opportunities for young people to lead productive and successful lives. In this press release announcing the observance, President Barack Obama describes the racial disparities among detained and incarcerated youth and the negative impact that involvement in the juvenile justice system can have on young people. The President also lists federal initiatives and programs that aim to address opportunity gaps, reduce recidivism, and improve youth outcomes. **Learn more.**
47.202 Presolicitation planning. Contracting officers shall inform activities that plan to acquire transportation or transportation-related services of the applicable lead-time requirements, that is— ( a ) The Service Contract Labor Standards statute requirement to obtain a wage determination by accessing the Wage Determinations at *SAM.gov* website (*https://www.sam.gov*) using the Wage Determinations at *SAM.gov* process or by submitting a request directly to the Department of Labor on this website using the e98 process before the issuance of an invitation for bid, request for proposal, or commencement of negotiations for any contract exceeding $2,500 that may be subject to the Service Contract Labor Standards statute (see subpart 22.10);
( b ) The possible requirement to provide, during the solicitation period, time for prospective offerors or contractors to inspect origin and destination locations; or
( c ) The possible requirement for inspection by agency personnel of prospective contractor facilities and equipment.
[48 FR 42424, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 71 FR 36935, June 28, 2006; 79 FR 24214, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 71325, Dec. 15, 2021]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Wilkes, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, at an appointed Additional Term, rendered February 6, 1961 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to serve a term of 15- to 20 years. Judgment affirmed. The evidence warranted the implicit finding of the jury that the employee, who was in charge of the establishment where the crimes were perpetrated, was in the ladies’ room thereof when the money was taken from the cash register and a closet, but that at the point of a gun the defendant had ordered her to go into such room. Therefore she and the defendant were not in the view of each other at the time the money was taken. This fact, however, does not mean that the money was not taken, as set forth in section 2120 of the Penal Law, “in the presence of” such employee (see 77 C. J. S., Robbery, § 9, p. 455, and eases there cited). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0130 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. STEPHEN DEAN PRUITT ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Nove mber 2 0 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 17 2022

10/17/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0130
#### 416.203-4 Contract clauses.

An economic price adjustment clause based on cost indexes of labor or material may be used under the conditions listed in FAR 16.203-4(d) after approval by the HCA and consultation with the Office of the General Counsel.