alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
32.406 Letters of credit. ( a ) The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) prescribes regulations and instructions covering the use of letters of credit for advance payments under contracts. See Treasury Department Circular 1075 (31 CFR part 205), and the implementing instructions in the Treasury Financial Manual, available in offices providing financial advice and assistance.
( b ) If agencies provide advance payments to contractors, use of the following methods is required unless the agency has obtained a waiver from the Treasury Department: ( 1 ) By letter of credit if the contracting agency expects to have a continuing relationship with the contractor for a year or more, with advances totaling at least $120,000 a year.
( 2 ) By direct Treasury check if the circumstances do not meet the criteria in subparagraph (1) above.
( c ) If the agency has entered into multiple contracts (or a combination of contract(s) and assistance agreement(s)) involving eligibility of a contractor for more than one letter of credit, the agency shall follow arrangements made under Treasury procedures for ( 1 ) consolidating funding to the same contractor under one letter of credit or
( 2 ) replacing multiple letters of credit with a single letter of credit.
( d ) The letter of credit enables the contractor to withdraw Government funds in amounts needed to cover its own disbursements of cash for contract performance. Whenever feasible, the agency shall, under the direction and approval of the Department of the Treasury, use a letter of credit method that requires the contractor not to withdraw the Government funds until the contractor's checks have been ( 1 ) forwarded to the payees (delay of drawdown technique), or
( 2 ) presented to the contractor's bank for payment (checks paid technique) (see 31 CFR 205.3 and 205.4(d)).
( e ) The Treasury regulations provide for terminating the advance financing arrangement if the contractor is unwilling or unable to minimize the elapsed time between receipt of the advance and disbursement of the funds. In such cases, if reversion to normal payment methods is not feasible, the Treasury regulation provides for use of a working capital method of advance; i.e., for limiting advances to ( 1 ) only the estimated disbursements for a given initial period and
( 2 ) subsequently, for only actual cash disbursements (31 CFR 205.3(k) and 205.7).
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 19805, May 27, 1987]
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.7(ii) 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment
Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into by and among Clearwater Paper Corporation and Gordon L. Jones, effective as of September 22, 2009. 
 RECITALS 
 A. Clearwater Paper Corporation, as successor in interest, and Mr. Jones
entered into the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective as of July 28, 2008. 
 B. The parties now wish to enter into
this Amendment to modify the Agreement to conform the definition of change-of-control to that contained in the company’s compensation and benefit plans. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 
 1.
“30%” shall be substituted for “20%” where it appears in Section (9)(j)(i)(B) and Section (9)(j)(iii). 
 2. All other provisions of the Agreement will be unaffected by this Amendment and shall remain in full force and effect. 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is executed effective as of date set forth above. 
  

			
	CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Boh A. Dickey
		 	Boh A. Dickey
		 	Chair of the Board
	
	Gordon L. Jones
	
	/s/ Gordon L. Jones
	Gordon L. Jones
#### In the Matter of Frank Chevrolet Corp., Appellant, v. Sam Meyers, as President of Local 259, United Automobile Workers, AFL-CIO, et al., Respondents.

Motion by petitioner-appellant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from an order of this court entered May 7, 1962, and for a stay, denied. Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 14, 1961 (inadvertently referred to in the moving papers as an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, rendered February 24, 1961), denied on condition that the appeal be perfected and argued or submitted at the September Term, commencing September 10, 1962; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Cross motion by appellant to dispense with printing of two appeals, to wit: (1) its appeal from the said order and judgment of February 14, 1961; and (2) its appeal, transferred to this court by the *839Appellate Division, First Department, on May 4, 1962, from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 19, 1961; and to have both appeals heard together on the original papers at the September Term of this court. Motion granted. Both appeals will be heard together on the original papers, but on printed briefs, which should contain a copy of the opinions, if any, rendered by the courts below. The appeals are ordered on the calendar for the September Term, commencing September 10, 1962; appellant’s briefs are directed to be served and filed on or before July 23, 1962. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2022

Number of new awards: 5Total new awards funded: $4,697,989.00

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2023

Projects funded for 2023-24:  MS Excel  (36K)

## FY 2022

Projects funded for 2022-23:  MS Excel  (35K) 

## FY 2021

Projects funded for 2021-22:  MS Excel (12K)

## FY 2020

Projects funded for 2020-21:  MS Excel (35K)

## FY 2019

Projects funded for 2019-20:  MS Excel (33K)

## FY 2018

Projects funded for 2018-19:  MS Excel (35K)

## FY 2017

Projects funded for 2017-18:  MS Excel (34K)

## FY 2016

Projects funded for 2016-17:  MS Excel (87K)

## FY 2015

Projects funded for 2015-16:  MS Excel (87K) | PDF (430K)

## FY 2014

Projects funded for 2014-15:  MS Excel (90K) | PDF (426K)

## FY 2013

Projects funded for 2013-14:  MS Excel (87K)

## FY 2012

Projects funded for 2012-13:  MS Excel (88K) | PDF (428K)

TRIO Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 95-5923

WADDELL EUGENE CALDWELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem.

N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-95-157)

Submitted: August 27, 1996

Decided: November 13, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON,

Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

William E. Martin, Federal Public Defender, Gregory Davis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, John W. Stone, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Waddell Eugene Caldwell appeals from the sentence imposed by

the district court after pleading guilty to attempted armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) (West Supp. 1996). We

affirm.

Caldwell argues that the district court erred in not applying United

States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual , § 2X1.1(b)(1)

(Nov. 1995), which provides for a three level decrease "unless the

defendant completed all the acts the defendant believed necessary for

successful completion of the substantive offense or the circumstances

demonstrate that the defendant was about to complete all such acts

but for apprehension or interruption by some similar event beyond the

defendant's control." At Caldwell's sentencing hearing the district

court refused to apply U.S.S.G. § 2X1.1(b)(1) because it determined

that Caldwell had completed all the acts he believed necessary to

complete the bank robbery and most likely left the bank before completing the robbery because of apprehension of being detected and/or

arrested. Where the district court's decision to make or not make an

adjustment is primarily a factual determination this Court applies the

clearly erroneous standard of review. United States v. Daughtrey, 874

F.2d 213, 217 (4th Cir. 1989). Upon reviewing the record, we find

that the district court's determination was not clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, we affirm.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 92 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Food and Nutrition Service 

relating to ‘‘Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint Processing-Policy Update’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 

Mr. C. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida (for himself, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. 

OGLES, Mr. MANN, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. LAMBORN, Ms. MACE, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. BOST, 

Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, Mr. BANKS, Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. 

POSEY, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. GUEST, and Mrs. 

BOEBERT) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Agriculture 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Food and Nutrition Service relating to ‘‘Application 

of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination 

Complaint Processing-Policy Update’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Food 

4 and Nutrition Service relating to ‘‘Application of Bostock 

5 v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaint 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 92 IH 

1 Processing—Policy Update’’ (issued May 5, 2022, as a 

2 memorandum, and a letter of opinion from the Govern3 ment Accountability Office dated June 5, 2023, printed 

4 in the Congressional record on June 7, 2023, on pages 

5 S1998–S2000, concluding that such memorandum is a 

6 rule under the Congressional Review Act), and such rule 

7 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### 370.404 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.270-5b, Care of Live Vertebrate Animals, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that involve live vertebrate animals.
# C_2020247EN.01000101.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2020/C 247/01)

Last publication

OJ C 240, 20.7.2020

Past publications

OJ C 230, 13.7.2020

OJ C 222, 6.7.2020

OJ C 215, 29.6.2020

OJ C 209, 22.6.2020

OJ C 201, 15.6.2020

OJ C 191, 8.6.2020

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
## FY 2021- FY 2025

Projected five-year funding: $471,500,000Projected annual funding: $94,300,000Total number of awards:100Average annual award: $943,000

## FY 2016- FY2020

Total five-year funding: $456,488,131Average annual funding: $91,297,626Total number of awards:91Average annual award: $1,003,271,618

Institutional Service Home
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 190 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection relating to ‘‘Truth in Lending (Regulation Z); Use of Digital 

User Accounts to Access Buy Now, Pay Later Loans’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2024 

Mr. PALMER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 

to ‘‘Truth in Lending (Regulation Z); Use of Digital 

User Accounts to Access Buy Now, Pay Later Loans’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ‘‘Truth 

5 in Lending (Regulation Z); Use of Digital User Accounts 

6 to Access Buy Now, Pay Later Loans’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 190 IH 

1 47068; published May 31, 2024), and such rule shall have 

2 no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 147 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 147

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Occupational Safety 
       and Health Administration relating to ``Worker Walkaround 
                 Representative Designation Process''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2024

Mrs. Miller of Illinois (for herself, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Smith of 
  Nebraska, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. 
 Moolenaar, Mr. Mann, Mr. Bean of Florida, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Allen, Mr. 
Grothman, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Duarte, Ms. Letlow, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Sessions, 
  Mr. Biggs, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Smucker, Mr. Babin, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. 
  Webster of Florida, Ms. Boebert, and Mr. Bishop of North Carolina) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Occupational Safety 
       and Health Administration relating to ``Worker Walkaround 
                 Representative Designation Process''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration 
relating to ``Worker Walkaround Representative Designation Process'' 
(89 Fed. Reg. 22558 (April 1, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force 
or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Business and Operations Advisory Committee (9556) (Virtual).                

*Date and Time:*                     March 10, 2021; 11:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. (EST).                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (Virtual attendance only). To attend the virtual meeting, please send your request for the meeting link to the following email address:                     *asohail@nsf.gov.*

*Type of Meeting:*                     OPEN.                

*Contact Person:*                     Anna Sohail, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-8200.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice concerning issues related to the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF's business operations.                

## Agenda

    - Welcome/Introductions
    - BFA, OIRM, Budget Updates
    - Award Performance Reporting Compliance Challenges
    - Approval of Subcommittee for Information Technology Related to Renewing NSF
    - Remote Workforce in the New Normal
    - NSF Strategic Plan Feedback
    - Meeting with Dr. Panchanathan and Dr. Crim

Dated: February 11, 2021.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-03119 Filed 2-16-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit 23.2**

----

**CONSENT  OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-99899 on Form S-8 of Deb  Shops, Inc., of our report dated March 8, 2004 (except for note B, as to which  the date is April 15, 2005), with respect to the consolidated financial statements  of Deb Shops, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended January 31,  2004, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended January  31, 2006.

|   | ERNST      & YOUNG LLP |
|--------|----------------------------|

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  April 10, 2006 

----
Exhibit 23 (a)



              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


Interface Systems, Inc.
5855 Interface Drive
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the previously filed Registration Statement (Form S-
8) of our reports dated November 14, 1996 relating to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of Interface Systems, Inc. and
subsidiaries appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 1996.


/S/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP             

Troy, Michigan
December 24, 1996