alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 74


                                                                EXHIBIT 12.3

                       SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
                            (Thousands Except Ratio)
                                   (Unaudited)


Operating Income                                                    $136,144

Adjustments:
  Income taxes                                                        38,327
  Provision for deferred income taxes                                  4,910
  Deferred investment tax credits                                     (4,696)
  Other income and deductions                                           (304)
  Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
    used during construction                                           1,789
  Interest portion of financing leases                                 1,317
                                                                   ---------

        Earnings                                                    $177,487
                                                                   =========
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                                         $42,891
  Amortization of debt issuance cost                                   3,501
  Other interest                                                       4,912
  Interest portion of financing leases                                 1,317
                                                                   ---------

        Fixed Charges                                                $52,621
                                                                   =========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                      3.37
                                                                   =========
Exhibit 10.7



FIRST AMENDMENT TO

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



FIRST
AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT,dated as of August 12, 2005, between Chesapeake Corporation, a Virginia corporation (the Company), and Candace C. Formacek (the Executive).



WHEREAS,the Company and the Executive entered into an Executive
Employment Agreement (the Agreement) dated January 3, 2005; and



WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the Company and the Executive; and



WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement;



NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended in the following respects:



Section 1 (b) is amended to read as follows:



(b) The period described in paragraph (a) shall be extended for an
additional twelve months unless the Company, before each November 1 of any year, provides written notice to the Executive that the period will not be extended. The preceding sentence shall first be effective to extend the period described in
paragraph (a) until December 31, 2007, unless written notice to the contrary is provided to the Executive by the Company before November 1, 2005.



Except as provided above, the terms of the Agreement, dated January 3, 2005, shall remain in effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to
Executive Employment Agreement to be duly executed on its behalf and the Executive has duly executed this First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, all as of the date first above written.



|                        |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|EXECUTIVE               |  | CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION                               
|                        | 
|/s/ Candace C. Formacek |  | /s/ J.P. Causey Jr.                                  
|Candace C. Formacek     |  | J.P. Causey Jr.                                      
|                        |  | Executive Vice President, Secretary & General
Counsel
# C_2020418EN.01000701.xml

| 3.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/7

---

Public holidays in 2021: EEA/EFTA States and EEA institutions

(2020/C 418/07)

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway | EFTA Surveillance Authority | EFTA Court |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Friday 1 January | X | X | X | X | X |
| Monday 4 January | | | | X | |
| Tuesday 5 January | | | | X | |
| Wednesday 6 January | | X | | X | |
| Thursday 7 January | | | | X | |
| Friday 8 January | | | | X | |
| Tuesday 2 February | | X | | | |
| Monday 15 February | | | | | X |
| Tuesday 16 February | | X | | | |
| Friday 19 March | | X | | | |
| Thursday 1 April | X | | X | X | X |
| Friday 2 April | X | X | X | X | X |
| Monday 5 April | X | X | X | X | X |
| Thursday 22 April | X | | | | |
| Thursday 13 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| Friday 14 May | | | | X | X |
| Monday 17 May | | | X | | |
| Monday 24 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| Thursday 3 June | | X | | | |
| Monday 17 June | X | | | | |
| Wednesday 23 June | | | | | X |
| Monday 2 August | X | | | | |
| Monday 30 August | | | | | X |
| Wednesday 8 September | | X | | | |
| Monday 1 November | | X | | X | X |
| Tuesday 2 November | | | | | X |
| Wednesday 8 December | | X | | | |
| Friday 24 December | X | X | | X | X |
| Monday 27 December | | | | X | X |
| Tuesday 28 December | | | | X | X |
| Wednesday 29 December | | | | X | X |
| Thursday 30 December | | | | X | X |
| Friday 31 December | X | X | | X | X |
| **Public holidays falling on Saturdays and Sundays are not listed. |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

EFTA Surveillance Authority

EFTA Court

Friday 1 January

X

X

X

X

X

Monday 4 January

X

Tuesday 5 January

X

Wednesday 6 January

X

X

Thursday 7 January

X

Friday 8 January

X

Tuesday 2 February

X

Monday 15 February

X

Tuesday 16 February

X

Friday 19 March

X

Thursday 1 April

X

X

X

X

Friday 2 April

X

X

X

X

X

Monday 5 April

X

X

X

X

X

Thursday 22 April

X

Thursday 13 May

X

X

X

X

X

Friday 14 May

X

X

Monday 17 May

X

Monday 24 May

X

X

X

X

X

Thursday 3 June

X

Monday 17 June

X

Wednesday 23 June

X

Monday 2 August

X

Monday 30 August

X

Wednesday 8 September

X

Monday 1 November

X

X

X

Tuesday 2 November

X

Wednesday 8 December

X

Friday 24 December

X

X

X

X

Monday 27 December

X

X

Tuesday 28 December

X

X

Wednesday 29 December

X

X

Thursday 30 December

X

X

Friday 31 December

X

X

X

X

**Public holidays falling on Saturdays and Sundays are not listed.

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated January 22, 1997, included in this Form 10-K, into CopyTele,
Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8, as amended, (File
No. 33-49402), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-72716),
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-62381) and Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-16933).




                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
New York, New York
January 28, 1997
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7814
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEITH E. BRYANT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR95-202-CCB, CA-01-1161-CCB) Submitted: April 30, 2003 Decided: May 19, 2003 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith E. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Keith Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying his motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a motion under § 2255 unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Bryant has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny Bryant’s motion for appointment of counsel and an investigator, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Reunification      

# Resource: Reunification

This podcast episode focuses on the current reality of reunification across the public child welfare system. The episode features a conversation among child welfare professionals, members of the American Bar Association (ABA) Center on Children and the Law, the Children’s Bureau, and a foster care alumnus. Discussion topics include the following:  
                  -  What the data indicate regarding reunifying families involved in the child welfare system  
                  -  What the Federal government and national partners are doing to increase reunification  
                  -  Racial inequities, specifically for teen boys of color, within reunification efforts  
                  -  How local agencies, caseworkers, and communities can shift their mindsets and actions to ensure reunification is treated as the primary goal when children are removed from their families  

**Learn more.**
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 28 (Friday, February 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9335-9336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02888]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9055-3]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed February 1, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through February 8, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210017, Final, FEMA, CT, ADOPTION--Resilient Bridgeport, 
Review Period Ends: 03/15/2021, Contact: Eric Kuns 202-805-9089.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has adopted the 
Connecticut Department of Housing Final EIS No. 20190215, filed 08/29/
2019 with EPA. FEMA was not a cooperating agency on this project. 
Therefore, republication of the document is necessary under Section 
1506.3(b)(1) of the CEQ regulations.

EIS No. 20210018, Final, BLM, CA, Crimson Solar Project Final 
Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Land Use Amendment to the 
California Desert Conservation Area Plan, Review Period Ends: 03/15/
2021, Contact: Miriam Liberatore 951-697-5200.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20200223, Draft, NRC, NM, Disposal of Mine Waste at the United 
Nuclear Corporation Mill Site in McKinley County, New Mexico, Comment 
Period Ends: 05/27/2021, Contact: Ashley Waldron 301-415-7317. Revision 
to FR Notice Published 12/23/2020; Extending the Comment Period from 
02/26/2021 to 05/27/2021.
EIS No. 20200239, Draft, MARAD, USCG, TX, Texas Gulflink Deepwater Port 
License Application, Comment Period Ends: 01/22/2021, Contact: Brad 
McKitrick 202-372-1443. Revision to FR Notice Published 11/27/2020; 
Correcting the Comment Period Due Date from 01/11/2021 to 01/22/2021; 
and Correcting the Lead Agency to include MARAD.
EIS No. 20200263, Draft, DOE, ID, Draft Versatile Test Reactor 
Environment

[[Page 9336]]

Impact Statement, Comment Period Ends: 03/02/2021, Contact: James 
Lovejoy 208-526-6805. Revision to FR Notice Published 12/31/2020; 
Extending the Comment Period from 02/16/2021 to 03/02/2021.

    Dated: February 8, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-02888 Filed 2-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### 52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations.

As prescribed in 9.108-5(b), insert the following clause:

# Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations (NOV 2015)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Inverted domestic corporation* means a foreign incorporated entity that meets the definition of an inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c).

*Subsidiary* means an entity in which more than 50 percent of the entity is owned—

(1) Directly by a parent corporation; or

(2) Through another subsidiary of a parent corporation.

(b) If the contractor reorganizes as an inverted domestic corporation or becomes a subsidiary of an inverted domestic corporation at any time during the period of performance of this contract, the Government may be prohibited from paying for Contractor activities performed after the date when it becomes an inverted domestic corporation or subsidiary. The Government may seek any available remedies in the event the Contractor fails to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract as a result of Government action under this clause.

(c) Exceptions to this prohibition are located at 9.108-2.

(d) In the event the Contractor becomes either an inverted domestic corporation, or a subsidiary of an inverted domestic corporation during contract performance, the Contractor shall give written notice to the Contracting Officer within five business days from the date of the inversion event.

(End of clause)

[76 FR 31414, May 31, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 27548, May 10, 2012; 79 FR 74557, Dec. 15, 2014; 80 FR 38307, July 2, 2015]
#### 49.604 Release of excess funds under terminated contracts.

The following format shall be used to recommend the release of excess funds under terminated contracts, except if the contracting office retains responsibility for settlement of the termination:

FROM: Termination Contracting Officer ______ [address]

TO: Contracting office ________ [address]

SUBJ: Terminated Contract No. ____ with ____ [Contractor]

Refs:

(a) [*Cite termination notice and effective date.*]

(b) [*Cite prior letters releasing excess funds, if any.*]

1. Referenced termination notice, ______ [*insert* “completely” *or* “partially”] terminated contract ______.

2. Based on the best information available, it is estimated that the gross settlement cost will be $____________. The amount available for release as excess to the contract is $____________. Any payments previously made to the Contractor for terminated items have been considered in arriving at the above amounts.

[*If prior letters recommending release of excess funds are cited, use the following as paragraph 2:*

“The estimated settlement costs previously reported by reference (b) in the amount of $____________ are revised. On the best evidence now available, it is estimated that the settlement costs will be $____________. The additional amount available for release is $____________”.]

3. The related appropriations and amounts involved are:

| Appropriations | Allocated Amounts | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | |
| | | |

*Copies to:*

Paying Office

Accounting and Finance Office

Other
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

December 07, 2015

Hon. Laura Hinojosa

District Clerk

100 N Closner - 1st Floor

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00283-CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR-712-08-C

Style: MARK ANTHONY MONCADA ESTRADA v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

The judgment of the trial court was AFFIRMED by this Court on the 23rd day of April, 

2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Tex R. App. P. 51.2(a)(1) provides that the clerk of the trial court shall send an 

acknowledgment to the clerk of the appellate court of the receipt of the mandate. Please review 

the requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 51.2(b) regarding the issuance of a capias in cases in which 

the trial court’s judgment is affirmed and the defendant is not in custody.

Please sign the attached acknowledgment of receipt of the mandate and submit through 

the TAMES Records Submission Portal (RSP) as soon as possible.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Michael W. Morris (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Ricardo P. Rodriguez (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Mark Anthony Moncada Estrada

I hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate in cause no. 13-13-00283-CR this 

________ day of _________________, 2015.

District/County Clerk, 

By :____________________________
BEFORE THE 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Mike Borsetti et al., 

Third-party Complainant 

Docket DOT -OST -2014-0166 

v. 

British Airways Plc 

MOTION OF BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

Richard Mendles 

General Counsel, Americas 

James B. Blaney 

Senior Counsel, Americas 

British Airways Plc 

2 Park Avenue, Suite 1100 

New York, NY 10016 

richard.mendles@ba.com 

jim. blaney@ba.com 

October 6, 2014 

Don H. Hainbach 

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC 

1200 New Hampshire Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Phone:202-776-3970 

dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 
BEFORE THE 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Mike Borsetti et al., 

Third-party Complainant 

Docket DOT -OST -2014-0166 

v. 

British Airways Plc 

MOTION OF BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to § 302.405, the British Airways answer to the complaint filed in this docket is 

due fifteen days following the date the complaint was filed. British Airways respectfully 

requests an extension of that deadline until October 21, 2014. 

The requested extension is required to enable British Airways to fully investigate the 

factual circumstances applicable to the allegations made in the complaint and to enable British 

Airways to coordinate its response with counsel and staff in the United States and the United 

Kingdom. Because the initial transportation involved in the complaint was booked on and 

ticketed by American Airlines, it also is necessary to coordinate with American Airlines 

personnel. Finally, personal issues required undersigned counsel to be out of the office for 

several days following service of the complaint. 

British Airways requested Mr. Borsetti to provide his consent to this request for an 

extension but he has not yet responded. 
ACCORDINGLY, British Airways submits that it has demonstrated good cause for grant 

of the requested extension of the deadline for submitting its answer to the complaint until 

October 21, 2014. 

5esp~ submitted, 

I 

( 

Don H. Hainbach 

Counsel for British Airways Pic 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 61

h day of October, 2014, a copy of the foregoing Motion of 

British Airways Plc was served via electronic mail on the parties named below: 

Mike Borsetti 

Blane Workie 

mike@borsetti.com 

blane. workieui)dot. gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ESTATE OF MICHAEL KIEFNER

PETITION OF: HOPE KIEFNER AND 

DIANA WIBLE

:

:

:

:

:

No. 491 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### 52.244-5 Competition in Subcontracting.

As prescribed in 44.204(c), insert the following clause:

# Competition in Subcontracting (AUG 2024)

(a) The Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.

(b) If the Contractor is an approved mentor under the DoD Mentor-Protégé Program (10 U.S.C. 4902), the Contractor may award subcontracts under this contract on a noncompetitive basis to its protégés.

(End of clause)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34762, July 3, 1995; 61 FR 2638, Jan. 26, 1996; 61 FR 67420, Dec. 20, 1996; 63 FR 34062, June 22, 1998; 89 FR 61339, July 30, 2024]