alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017065EN.01000101.xml

| 1.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8318 — Samsung Electronics/Harman International Industries)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 65/01)

On 23 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8318. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8318. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2020244EN.01000101.xml

| 24.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

23 July 2020

(2020/C 244/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1569 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4429 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91195 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2640 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0731 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 157,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,6073 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,342 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 347,31 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4141 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8355 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,9229 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6246 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5486 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9676 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7384 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6033 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 389,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,2203 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1057 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5215 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 948,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9267 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,202 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,5723 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,685 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,9524 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,9685 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,5770 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1569

JPY

Japanese yen

123,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4429

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91195

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2640

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0731

ISK

Iceland króna

157,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,6073

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,342

HUF

Hungarian forint

347,31

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4141

RON

Romanian leu

4,8355

TRY

Turkish lira

7,9229

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6246

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5486

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9676

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7384

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6033

KRW

South Korean won

1 389,31

ZAR

South African rand

19,2203

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1057

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5215

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 948,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9267

PHP

Philippine peso

57,202

RUB

Russian rouble

82,5723

THB

Thai baht

36,685

BRL

Brazilian real

5,9524

MXN

Mexican peso

25,9685

INR

Indian rupee

86,5770

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
----

----

| CLECO POWER LLC |  EXHIBIT 32.4 |
|-----------------|--------------------|

|   Cleco Power LLC                   |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     |
| 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                       |
| AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                        |
| SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |

| (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                               |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date:  August 5, 2009          |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Darren J. Olagues                        |
| Darren J. OlaguesSenior Vice President & CFO   |

----

----
#### INGRAM v. MURTHA et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1906.)

Action by Harry Ingram against Thomas F. Murtha and others.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs. Order filed.
EXHIBIT 12.1

                 CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (CONSOLIDATED)
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,1999
                            (Thousands Except Ratio)
                                   (Unaudited)


     Operating Income                               $284,789

     Adjustments:
        Income taxes                                 144,084
        Provision for deferred income taxes          (27,886)
        Deferred investment tax credits               (3,858)
        Other income and deductions                     (783)
        Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
             used during construction                  3,108
                                                    ---------

               Earnings                             $399,454
                                                    =========


     Fixed Charges:
        Interest on long-term debt                  $ 90,662
        Interest on short-term debt and other         15,746
        Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities   12,000
                                                    ---------

               Fixed Charges                        $118,408
                                                    =========


     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges               3.37
                                                    =========
47.303-10 F.o.b. inland carrier, point of exportation. ( a ) *Explanation of delivery term. F.o.b. inland carrier, point of exportation* means free of expense to the Government, on board the conveyance of the inland carrier, delivered to the specified point of exportation.
( b ) *Contractor responsibilities.* The contractor shall— ( 1 ) ( i ) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or
( ii ) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance with carrier requirements to protect the goods and to ensure assessment of the lowest applicable transportation charge;
( 2 ) Prepare and distribute commercial bills of lading;
( 3 ) ( i ) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition in or on the conveyance of the carrier on the date or within the period specified; and
( ii ) Pay and bear all applicable charges, including transportation costs, to the point of delivery specified in the contract;
( 4 ) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery of the shipment to the point of delivery specified in the contract; and
( 5 ) At the Government's request and expense, assist in obtaining the documents required for ( i ) exportation or
( ii ) importation at destination.
( c ) *Contract clause.* The contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the clause at 52.247-38, F.o.b. Inland Carrier, Point of Exportation, when the delivery term is f.o.b. inland carrier, point of exportation.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6776

FRED FREEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; COMMISSIONER OZMINT; DOCTOR OLIVENCIA; WARDEN TAYLOR; NURSE HARRISON; NURSE FLANNERY; WARDEN BAZZLE; MUHAAWHA; GONSLA MOORE, Classification Case worker of medical; ATTORNEY GENERAL MCMASTER; DOCTOR ALLEWINE; DOCTOR ALEWINE; DOCTOR BROWN; JANET PHILLIPS; DOCTOR PAUL, Defendants - Appellees, and PAUL ENLOE, Doctor, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:06-cv-1171-DCN) Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 17, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Fred Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Fred Freeman appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Freeman v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr. , No. 0:06-cv-1171-DCN (D.S.C. filed Apr. 27, 2007 & entered Apr. 30, 2007). We deny Freeman’s motions for appointment of counsel, production of documents, and to modify pleadings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Denis A. Krusos, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1.   The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended October 31,
     2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                       /s/ Denis A. Krusos
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Denis A. Krusos
                                                       Chairman of the Board and
January 16, 2007                                       Chief Executive Officer
47.404 Air freight forwarders. ( a ) Agencies may use air freight forwarders that are engaged in international air transportation (49 U.S.C. 1301(24)(c)) for U.S. Government-financed movements of property. The rule on disallowance of expenditures in 47.403-3(a) applies also to the air carriers used by these international air freight forwarders.
( b ) Agency personnel shall inform international air freight forwarders that to facilitate prompt payments of their bills, they shall submit with their bills ( 1 ) a copy of the airway bill or manifest showing the air carriers used and
( 2 ) justification for the use of foreign-flag air carriers similar to the one shown in the clause at 52.247-63, Preference for U.S.-Flag Air Carriers.
[48 FR 42424, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 237, Jan. 2, 1997]
#### In the Matter of Morris Berzon, an Attorney.

Application by an attorney from the State of Massachusetts for admission to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in this State, granted. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2023

                - Project Abstracts for new awards (FY 2023 Competition):     PDF  (119K)

## FY 2022

                - Project Abstract(s):   Allan Hancock College -  PDF (119K)  Atlanta Technical College -  HTML (7K) 

## FY 2021

                - Project Abstract(s):     PDF  (71K)

FIPSE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 3422.1002 Statutory and Executive order requirements.
exhibit10-168.htm






  



  







CONFIDENTIAL  
Exhibit 10.168




*** Confidential Portion has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment by the Company to, and the material has been separately filed with, the SEC. Each omitted Confidential Portion is marked by three Asterisks.





EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE FULL-TIME-TRANSPONDER CAPACITY AGREEMENT (PRE-LAUNCH)









This Eighth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) (the “Eighth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 8th day of June, 2009 by and between INTELSAT CORPORATION, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(“Intelsat”), and GCI COMMUNICATION CORP., an Alaskan corporation (“Customer”).





RECITALS





WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) dated as of March 31, 2006, as amended (collectively, the “Agreement”) between Intelsat and Customer, Intelsat is providing Customer with *** (***) 36 *** transponders and *** (***)
*** transponders on Galaxy 18, and *** (***) *** transponders on Horizons 1;





WHEREAS, Customer and Intelsat wish to amend the terms of the Agreement to exercise Customer’s option for the *** Transponder, as defined in the Agreement;





AGREEMENT





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:






	
1.  
	
Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.









	
2.  
	
*** Transponder.  Intelsat agrees to provide to Customer and Customer agrees to accept from Intelsat *** (***) *** Transponder (the “*** Transponder”) meeting the performance specifications set forth in Appendix B attached hereto.









	
3.  
	
Capacity Term.  The Capacity Term for the *** Transponder Capacity shall commence on *** and continue until 23:59 Greenwich Mean Time on ***.









	
4.  
	
Monthly Fee.  The Monthly Fee for the *** Transponder Capacity shall be US$***,*** per month.









	
5.  
	
Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the amendment remain in full force and effect.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed and delivered this Seventh Amendment as of the day and year above written.









INTELSAT CORPORATION                                                                                                                         
  GCI COMMUNICATION CORP.










	  	  	  	  	  
	
/s/ Patricia Casey
	  	  	
/s/ Jimmy R. Sipes
	  
	
Name: Patricia Casey
	  	  	
Name: Jimmy R. Sipes
	  
	
Title: Senior VP and Deputy General Counsel
	  	  	
Title: VP Network Services & Chief Engineer
#### 514.407 Mistakes in bids.
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 88 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education 

relating to ‘‘Improving Income Driven Repayment for the William D. 

Ford Federal Direct Loan Program and the Federal Family Education 

Loan (FFEL) Program’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 

Mrs. MCCLAIN (for herself, Ms. FOXX, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. 

SESSIONS, Mr. MILLS, Mr. EZELL, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. BOST, Mr. 

LANGWORTHY, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Mr. 

CRENSHAW, Mr. BEAN of Florida, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. BANKS, 

Mr. BURGESS, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mrs. HINSON, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. SMUCKER, Mr. SELF, Ms. 

VAN DUYNE, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. SANTOS, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. 

WESTERMAN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. OWENS, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. 

MCCORMICK, and Mr. WITTMAN) submitted the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Education relating to ‘‘Improving Income Driven Repayment for the William D. Ford Federal 

Direct Loan Program and the Federal Family Education 

Loan (FFEL) Program’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 88 IH 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Education relating to ‘‘Improving Income 

5 Driven Repayment for the William D. Ford Federal Direct 

6 Loan Program and the Federal Family Education Loan 

7 (FFEL) Program’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 43820 (July 10, 2023)), 

8 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
(September 17, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York Respondent, v. Roy M. Darling, Appellant.

Motion for permission to proceed as a poor person denied on the ground no appeal lies from a decision. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
411.404 Contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.211-74, Period of Performance, when it is necessary to specify a period of performance, beginning on the date of award, date of receipt of notice of award, or a specified date.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.211-75, Effective Period of the Contract, when it is necessary to specify the effective period of the contract.
[63 FR 26995, May 15, 1998]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7300

TIMOTHY BOYD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:12-cv-00462-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: December 20, 2013

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Boyd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### 32.1006 [Reserved]