alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 30 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising 

Shareholder Rights’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2023 

Mr. BARR (for himself, Mr. NEWHOUSE, Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. 

STEIL, Mr. POSEY, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. 

HILL, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mr. MEUSER, Mrs. RODGERS of 

Washington, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. ROSE, Mr. WENSTRUP, Ms. FOXX, 

Mr. LATURNER, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. ROY, 

Mr. EMMER, Mr. OGLES, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. OWENS, 

Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. CRAWFORD, 

Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. STEWART, Mr. WILLIAMS of 

Texas, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. GUEST, Mr. GOODEN of 

Texas, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. NUNN of Iowa, Mrs. 

HOUCHIN, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. NORMAN, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. FLOOD, Mrs. 

CAMMACK, Mr. PERRY, Mr. MANN, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. 

BURCHETT, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. LAWLER, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. EZELL, Mr. BALDERSON, 

Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. KUSTOFF, Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. MOORE

of Utah, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. JOHNSON of 

South Dakota, Ms. STEFANIK, and Mr. PALMER) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 30 IH 

the Department of Labor relating to ‘‘Prudence and 

Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising 

Shareholder Rights’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘Prudence and Loyalty in 

5 Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder 

6 Rights’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 73822 (December 1, 2022)), and 

7 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for New MexicoReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for New MexicoReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for New MexicoReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479580005.unknown

# _1479580006.unknown

# _1479580004.unknown
MICHAEL DENNARD 

GOODSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0347

Opinion filed February 6, 2015.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Michael Dennard Goodson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the 

merits.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Development Grants

## Technical Review Form for New HampshireReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to High-Quality Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Development Grants

## Technical Review Form for New HampshireReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to High-Quality Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Development Grants

## Technical Review Form for New HampshireReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to High-Quality Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479579818.unknown

# _1479579819.unknown

# _1479579817.unknown
39.203 Applicability. ( a ) *General.* Unless an exception at 39.204 or an exemption at 39.205 applies, acquisitions for ICT supplies and services shall meet the applicable ICT accessibility standards at 36 CFR 1194.1.
( b ) *Indefinite-quantity contracts.* Confirmation of an exception or a determination of an exemption is not required prior to award of an indefinite-quantity contract, except for requirements that are to be satisfied by initial award. The contract must identify which supplies and services the contractor indicates as compliant and show where full details of compliance can be found (*e.g.,* vendor's or other exact website location).
( c ) *Task order or delivery order.* At the time of issuance of a task order or delivery order under an indefinite-quantity contract, the requiring and ordering activities shall ensure compliance with the ICT accessibility standards and document an exception or exemption if applicable. Any task order or delivery order, or portion thereof, issued for a noncompliant ICT item shall be supported by the appropriate exception or exemption documented by the requiring activity.
( d ) *Commercial products and commercial services.* When acquiring commercial products and commercial services, an agency must comply with those ICT accessibility standards that can be met with supplies or services that are available in the commercial marketplace and that best address the agency's needs, but see 39.205(a)(3).
( e ) *Legacy ICT.* Any component or portion of existing ICT (*i.e.,* ICT that was procured, maintained, or used on or before January 18, 2018) is not required to comply with the current ICT accessibility standards if it— ( 1 ) Complies with an earlier standard issued pursuant to section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d), which is set forth in Appendix D to 36 CFR 1194.1); and
( 2 ) Has not been altered (*i.e.,* a change that affects interoperability, the user interface, or access to information or data) after January 18, 2018.
( f ) *Alterations of legacy ICT.* When altering any component or portion of existing ICT, after January 18, 2018, the component or portion must be modified to conform to the current ICT accessibility standards in 36 CFR 1194.1.
[86 FR 44232, Aug. 11, 2021, as amended at 86 FR 61030, Nov. 4, 2021]
4.1602 Identifying the PIID and supplementary PIID. ( a ) *Identifying the PIID in solicitation and contract award documentation (including forms and electronic generated formats).* Agencies shall include all PIIDs for all related procurement actions as identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section. ( 1 ) *Solicitation.* Identify the PIID for all solicitations. For amendments to solicitations, identify a supplementary PIID, in conjunction with the PIID for the solicitation.
( 2 ) *Contracts and purchase orders.* Identify the PIID for contracts and purchase orders.
( 3 ) *Delivery and task orders.* For delivery and task orders placed by an agency under a contract (*e.g.,* indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts, multi-agency contracts (MAC), Governmentwide acquisition contracts (GWACs), or Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) contracts), identify the PIID for the delivery and task order and the PIID for the contract.
( 4 ) *Blanket purchase agreements and basic ordering agreements.* Identify the PIID for blanket purchase agreements issued in accordance with 13.303, and for basic agreements and basic ordering agreements issued in accordance with subpart 16.7. For blanket purchase agreements issued in accordance with subpart 8.4 under a MAS contract, identify the PIID for the blanket purchase agreement and the PIID for the MAS contract. ( i ) *Orders.* For orders against basic ordering agreements or blanket purchase agreements issued in accordance with 13.303, identify the PIID for the order and the PIID for the blanket purchase agreement or basic ordering agreement.
( ii ) *Orders under subpart 8.4.* For orders against a blanket purchase agreement established under a MAS contract, identify the PIID for the order, the PIID for the blanket purchase agreement, and the PIID for the MAS contract.
( 5 ) *Modifications.* For modifications to actions described in paragraphs (a)(2) through (4) of this section, and in accordance with agency procedures, identify a supplementary PIID for the modification in conjunction with the PIID for the contract, order, or agreement being modified.
( b ) *Placement of the PIID on forms.* When the form (including electronic generated format) does not provide spaces or fields for the PIID or supplementary PIID required in paragraph (a) of this section, identify the PIID in accordance with agency procedures.
( c ) *Additional agency specific identification information.* If agency procedures require additional identification information in solicitations, contracts, or other related procurement instruments for administrative purposes, separate and clearly identify the additional information from the PIID.
[76 FR 39235, July 5, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 61745, Oct. 14, 2014; 79 FR 61741, Oct. 14, 2014]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Opportunity for Involvement: Participants Needed for National Survey on Supports Families Received During the Transition Years      

# Opportunity for Involvement: Participants Needed for National Survey on Supports Families Received During the Transition Years

This survey, developed by Pathways RTC and the Family-Run Executive Director Leadership Association, will document the kinds of support provided to family members and young adults with behavioral health challenges during the transition years (16–25). Family members and other allies who provide/provided support to young people and young adults who receive/received support are invited to complete the confidential survey. **Learn more.**
**Who May Apply: (by category)** Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs)

**Who May Apply: (specifically)**

- An  Alaska Native-serving institution  may receive a grant under section 317 of the Higher Education Act (HEA) if, at the time of application, it has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 20 percent Alaska Native students.
- A  Native Hawaiian-serving institution  may receive a grant authorized under section 317 of the HEA if, at the time of application, it has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 10 percent Native Hawaiian students. 

NOTE:  Applicants must first apply for and receive designation as an eligible institution.  Refer to the Tips and Assistance section on the Eligibility page to find more information, the latest webinar schedule, and/or presentations regarding eligibility.

**Services provided by the program:**

The programs assist eligible institutions of higher education to become self-sufficient by providing funds to improve and strengthen their academic quality, and institutional, management, and fiscal stability.

**List of Eligible Institutions for Title III and Title V Programs**

Institutional Service Home
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 27 (Thursday, February 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02822]



[[Page 9051]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-60-2020]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 90--Syracuse, New York, Authorization of 
Limited Production Activity, PPC Broadband, Inc. (Fiber Optic Cables); 
Dewitt, New York

    On October 8, 2020, PPC Broadband, Inc., (PPC Broadband) submitted 
a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within FTZ 90, in Dewitt, New York.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (85 FR 65790-65791, October 16, 2020). 
On February 5, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that further review of part of the proposed activity is 
warranted. The FTZ Board authorized the production activity described 
in the notification on a limited basis, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.14, and further subject to 
restrictions requiring that foreign-status tight buffered fiber be 
admitted to the zone in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41) and 
that aramid yarn, swellcoat blockers or equivalent be admitted to the 
zone in domestic/duty paid status (19 CFR 146.43).

    Dated: February 5, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02822 Filed 2-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### MASOR v. JACOBUS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Appeal—Order—ITotice—SuppicrsNCY.

A sufficient notice of appeal from an order was not rendered ineffectual because it contained a notice that appellant, intended to bring up for review another order piade in the action.

2. Orders—Appealable.

An order of the Special Term of the' City Court denying a motion by appellant to compel respondent to accept service of a notice of appeal is appealable under Code Civ. Proc. § 3189, allowing appeals from interlocutory judgments and orders at Special Term of the City Court.

Appeal from City Court'of New York, Special Term.

Action by Barnet Masor against William Jacobus and another. From an order denying a motion to compel plaintiff to accept service of a notice of appeal, defendant Jacobus appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Mitchell R. Erlanger, for appellant.

Henry Kuntz, for respondent.

FREEDMAN, P. J.

It is unnecessary to recite the history of this case leading up to the order from which the defendant Jacobus appealed. The only question for this court to determine upon, this appeal is whether or not the plaintiff’s attorney was justified in returning the notice of appeal served by the defendant Jacobus herein. *271If so, the order appealed from denying defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff’s attorney to accept such service was correct.

The order appealed from was entered on April 9, 1903, and the notice of appeal contained all the recitals necessary to effectuate an appeal from such order. It also contained a notice to the effect that the appellant intended to bring up for review an order made herein on March 30, 1903. This notice of appeal was returned by plaintiff’s attorney upon the sole ground that it contained such notice. Whether or not the insertion of such notice was sufficient to enable the court to review upon appeal the order therein mentioned need not be considered now. Its insertion did not render the notice of appeal void, nor ineffectual to bring up for consideration and decision the order of April 9, 1903. The question as to whether or not that order is an appealable one can best be determined when the appeal from that order is heard. The order from which this appeal is taken is clearly an appealable one under section 3189 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the plaintiff’s ground for refusing to accept service of a notice of appeal therefrom was untenable, and the order denying defendant’s motion to compel him to accept service was error.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and motion granted. All concur.
# C_2020393EN.01000301.xml

| 18.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 393/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 393/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2020/C 393/03)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Lithuania

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Lithuania

Subject of commemoration: UNESCO Cultural Heritage - Kryžių Kalnas (the Hill of Crosses)

Description of the design: The design depicts the Hill of Crosses: fragments of wooden and forged crosses, symbolising Lithuanian cross-crafting and folk culture. Cross-crafting and cross-symbolism in Lithuania are included in the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. The inscriptions featured are: Lithuania’s name ‘LIETUVA’, the year of issue ‘2020’ on the top, ‘KRYŽIŲ KALNAS’ (the Hill of Crosses) and the mark of the Lithuanian Mint at the bottom. The design is realised by Rytas Jonas Belevičius.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 500 000

Date of issue: Fourth quarter of 2020

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---