alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




October 30, 2009




Mr. Peter Pfeiffer

AptarGroup, Inc.

475 West Terra Cotta Avenue, Suite E

Crystal Lake, Illinois 60014




	 	 	 
	Subject:

	 	Employment Agreement between AptarGroup, Inc., and Eric Ruskoski
	 

	 	entered into on December 1, 2003, and amended and restated on July 18, 2008






Dear Peter,



In accordance with paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement mentioned above, this is to provide you
with written notice at least 30 days before the December 1 automatic extension date of my decision
to terminate the automatic extension of the Agreement.




Sincerely,




/s/
Eric Ruskoski          




Eric Ruskoski
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

711.3 

KA 06-02577 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ERIC HARRIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 3.) 

 

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

BARRY L. PORSCH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WATERLOO, FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of

the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of

the Seneca County Court (Dennis F. Bender, J.), entered July 31, 2006. 

The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate a judgment of

conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same memorandum as in People v Harris ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d

___ [June 12, 2015]).

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Certron
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended July 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the report), I,
Marshall I. Kass, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial officers of the
company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
company.

| |  |                      |  |   |  |                                                | 
| |  | -------------------- |  | - |  | ---------------------------------------------- | 
| |  | /s/ Marshall I. Kass
| |  | Name                 |  | : |  | Marshall I. Kass                              
| |  | Title                |  | : |  | Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | Date                 |  | : |  | September 10, 2003                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Key Staff

                - Sharon Easterling , Director of TRIO Upward Bound/EOC Programs, 202-453-7425
                - Dana Foreman , Ed.D, Program Lead, 202-987-0437
                - Program Specialists
                - Student Service Organizational Directory

## Mailing Address

OPE_TRIO@ed.gov
TRIO Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 3011.204-70 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.211-70, Index for Specifications, when an index or table of contents may be furnished with the specification.
# C_2018351EN.01000401.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 September 2018

(2018/C 351/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1576 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4564 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88730 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3090 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1316 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 128,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4665 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,731 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,37 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2774 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6638 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,9650 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6048 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5064 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0579 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7505 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5839 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 285,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4447 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9662 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4346 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 249,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7890 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,648 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,1422 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,448 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,6535 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7800 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9160 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1576

JPY

Japanese yen

131,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4564

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88730

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3090

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1316

ISK

Iceland króna

128,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4665

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,731

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,37

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2774

RON

Romanian leu

4,6638

TRY

Turkish lira

6,9650

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6048

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5064

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0579

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7505

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5839

KRW

South Korean won

1 285,75

ZAR

South African rand

16,4447

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9662

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4346

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 249,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7890

PHP

Philippine peso

62,648

RUB

Russian rouble

76,1422

THB

Thai baht

37,448

BRL

Brazilian real

4,6535

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7800

INR

Indian rupee

83,9160

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 36.600 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures applicable to the acquisition of architect-engineer services, including orders for architect-engineer services under multi-agency contracts (see 16.505(a)(9)).

[70 FR 11739, Mar. 9, 2005, as amended at 77 FR 194, Jan. 3, 2012]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Determining Youth and Young Adult Eligibility for Services: Grantee Tools and Processes      

# Resource: Determining Youth and Young Adult Eligibility for Services: Grantee Tools and Processes

This brief (PDF, 14 pages) describes the tools and processes that Youth At-Risk of Homelessness phase 2 (YARH-2) grantees implemented to identify and screen youth and young adults who might be eligible to participate in their comprehensive service models. The brief is created for individuals designing and implementing programs to serve youth and young adults in similar circumstances, including service providers, program administrators, program evaluators, and funders. **Learn more.**
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51339

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HUGO NOEL ROSALES, also known as Hugo Lopez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-1165-ALL

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hugo Noel Rosales

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 2, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51339

2

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certifications**I, Timothy R. Eller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Centex Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] andinternal control over financial reporting [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)] for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: August 2, 2005  /s/ TIMOTHY R. ELLER
32.802 Conditions. Under the Assignment of Claims Act, a contractor may assign moneys due or to become due under a contract if all the following conditions are met: ( a ) The contract specifies payments aggregating $1,000 or more.
( b ) The assignment is made to a bank, trust company, or other financing institution, including any Federal lending agency.
( c ) The contract does not prohibit the assignment.
( d ) Unless otherwise expressly permitted in the contract, the assignment— ( 1 ) Covers all unpaid amounts payable under the contract;
( 2 ) Is made only to one party, except that any assignment may be made to one party as agent or trustee for two or more parties participating in the financing of the contract; and
( 3 ) Is not subject to further assignment.
( e ) The assignee sends a written notice of assignment together with a true copy of the assignment instrument to the— ( 1 ) Contracting officer or the agency head;
( 2 ) Surety on any bond applicable to the contract; and
( 3 ) Disbursing officer designated in the contract to make payment.
#### Peter Schmidt *vs.*Eugene McCarthy.

May 16, 1890.

Several unimportant assignments of error disposed of.

Plaintiff built an addition to a house of defendant’s daughter-in-law, Mrs. Timothy McCarthy, on her land, and brought this action in the district court for Stearns county, to recover $450, the value of his labor and material, on the ground that the contract therefor was made by defendant, by Mrs. Timothy McCarthy as his agent. The latter having testified that defendant agreed with her that he would have the addition built, and that he told her to go and see plaintiff and have the work done, and that she was to repay him when she was able, was asked the following questions by defendant, each of which was excluded, the defendant excepting: “Were you to give Mr. McCarthy your note or anything for this money?” “You had some money that was due Mr. McCarthy. Didn’t the defendant direct you to keep the money and pay it to Mr. Schmidt ?” Plaintiff had a verdict for the full amount claimed, and the defendant appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

*Taylor, Calhoun & Rhodes,*for appellant.

*Hubert Hansen,*for respondent.

Gilfillan, C. J.

There is no merit in either assignment of error. Even had defendant been technically entitled, as a part of his cross-examination of the witness Mrs. McCarthy, to ask the questions which the court below excluded, it is apparent that he could not have been prejudiced by their exclusion. They were so manifestly immaterial that no conceivable answers that the witness might have made could in any way have affected the result.

Order affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

s0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138024 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138024 

 COA: 288275 

Tuscola CC: 05-009504-FH; 

05-009505-FH; 05-009506-FH 

DONALD DALE LOKKEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2019247EN.01002701.xml

| 23.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/27

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 July 2019

(2019/C 247/07)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1215 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4660 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89968 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5440 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1007 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,534 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2480 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7225 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3722 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5912 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4665 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7585 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6543 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5260 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 320,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5802 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7168 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3875 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 639,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6127 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,321 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,6525 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,593 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1983 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3416 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,3085 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1215

JPY

Japanese yen

121,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4660

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89968

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5440

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1007

ISK

Iceland króna

139,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,534

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2480

RON

Romanian leu

4,7225

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3722

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5912

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4665

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7585

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6543

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5260

KRW

South Korean won

1 320,34

ZAR

South African rand

15,5802

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7168

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3875

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 639,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6127

PHP

Philippine peso

57,321

RUB

Russian rouble

70,6525

THB

Thai baht

34,593

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1983

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3416

INR

Indian rupee

77,3085

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 99 (1)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Canada Southern Petroleum
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Randy Denecky , Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




                                              By /s/ Randy Denecky
                                              ____________________________
                                              Randy Denecky
                                              President, Treasurer and Chief
                                              Financial and Accounting Officer
5.201 General. ( a ) As required by the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(e)) and 41 U.S.C. 1708, agencies must make notices of proposed contract actions available as specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) For acquisitions of supplies and services, other than those covered by the exceptions in 5.202 and the special situations in 5.205, the contracting officer must transmit a notice to the GPE, for each proposed— ( i ) Contract action meeting the threshold in 5.101(a)(1);
( ii ) Modification to an existing contract for additional supplies or services that meets the threshold in 5.101(a)(1); or
( iii ) Contract action in any amount when advantageous to the Government.
( 2 ) When transmitting notices using electronic commerce, contracting officers must ensure the notice is forwarded to the GPE.
( c ) The primary purposes of the notice are to improve small business access to acquisition information and enhance competition by identifying contracting and subcontracting opportunities.
( d ) The GPE may be accessed via the Internet at *https://www.sam.gov*.
[66 FR 27410, May 16, 2001, as amended at 68 FR 56678, Oct. 1, 2003; 72 FR 63076, Nov. 7, 2007; 79 FR 24197, Apr. 29, 2014; 83 FR 42572, Aug. 22, 2018; 86 FR 71324, Dec. 15, 2021]