alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| CLECO POWER      LLC  |  EXHIBIT  32.3 |
|----------------------------|---------------------|

| Cleco      Power LLC                              |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO                    |
| 18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      |
| AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       |
| SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |

| (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Date:  November      5, 2008    |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Michael      H. Madison                   |
| Michael      H. MadisonChief      Executive Officer      |

----

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIRO E. MELENDEZ-IRAHETA, AKA 

Jairo Melendez, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-72557 

Agency No. A044-471-286 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Jairo E. Melendez-Iraheta, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro 

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for 

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-72557 

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s

factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). 

We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of deferral of removal 

under CAT because Melendez-Iraheta failed to show it is more likely than not he

will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if 

returned to El Salvador. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009);

see also Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1068 (9th Cir. 2009) (finding no 

likelihood of torture). We reject as unsupported by the record Melendez-Iraheta’s 

contentions that the agency ignored evidence or otherwise erred in its analysis of 

his claim.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Melendez-Iraheta’s contentions regarding 

his removability because he did not raise them to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 

358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not 

presented to the agency); Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 931 (9th Cir. 2004) 

(concluding the exhaustion requirement applies to “streamlined” decisions in 

which the BIA affirms the IJ’s decision without opinion).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
4.1402 Procedures. ( a ) Agencies shall ensure that contractors comply with the reporting requirements of 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards. Agencies shall review contractor reports on a quarterly basis to ensure the information is consistent with contract information. The agency is not required to address data for which the agency would not normally have supporting information, such as the compensation information required of contractors and first-tier subcontractors. However, the agency shall inform the contractor of any inconsistencies with the contract information and require that the contractor correct the report, or provide a reasonable explanation as to why it believes the information is correct. Agencies may review the reports at *http://www.fsrs.gov .*
( b ) When contracting officers report the contract action to the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) in accordance with FAR subpart 4.6, certain data will then pre-populate from FPDS, to assist contractors in completing and submitting their reports. If data originating from FPDS is found by the contractor to be in error when the contractor completes the subcontract report, the contractor should notify the Government contracting officer, who is responsible for correcting the data in FPDS. Contracts reported using the generic entity identifier allowed at FAR 4.605(c)(2) will interfere with the contractor's ability to comply with this reporting requirement, because the data will not pre-populate from FPDS.
( c ) If the contractor fails to comply with the reporting requirements, the contracting officer shall exercise appropriate contractual remedies. In addition, the contracting officer shall make the contractor's failure to comply with the reporting requirements a part of the contractor's performance information under Subpart 42.15.
( d ) There is a reporting exception in 52.204-10(g) for contractors and subcontractors who had gross income in the previous tax year under $300,000.
[75 FR 39419, July 8, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 44058, July 26, 2012; 77 FR 69718, Nov. 20, 2012; 81 FR 67738, Sept. 30, 2016]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Deaf 101      

# Resource: Deaf 101

This module provides participants with resources to increase their awareness of the ethnic and cultural diversity within the deaf community. This module examines identity and intersectionality among deaf people from lived experiences of deaf people. This module provides tools for students, instructors of deaf students, professionals with deaf coworkers, managers of deaf employees, and anyone who wants to engage with deaf people. **Learn more.**
# CA2020110EN.01000101.xml

| 2.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 110/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 110/1

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions — EPSO/AD/375/20 – Danish-language (DA) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/376/20 – Greek-language (EL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/377/20 – French-language (FR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/378/20 – Croatian-language (HR) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — EPSO/AD/379/20 – Polish-language (PL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 72 A of 5 March 2020
  )

(2020/C 110 A/01)

On page 8:

for:

‘EPSO/AD/377/20 — FRENCH-LANGUAGE (FR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

1.   Qualifications

You must have a level of education corresponding to completed university studies attested by one of the following qualifications in French, Belgian or Luxembourgish law and in the French language:

Avoir suivi une formation juridique complète, principalement dans un établissement d’enseignement supérieur belge, français ou luxembourgeois où les enseignements sont dispensés en langue française. Par formation juridique complète, il convient d’entendre une formation juridique de cinq années/300 crédits ECTS [European Credit Transfer System], pour les formations achevées depuis l’entrée en vigueur de la réforme de 2004 harmonisant les diplômes d’enseignement supérieur en Europe, ou de quatre ou cinq années pour les formations achevées antérieurement. Cette formation doit, en outre, avoir été sanctionnée par un diplôme correspondant au moins au master 2 (cinq années d’études), pour les diplômes obtenus après l’entrée en vigueur de ladite réforme de 2004, ou à la maîtrise en droit française (quatre années d’études), ou à la licence en droit belge (cinq années d’études), pour les diplômes obtenus après l’entrée en vigueur de cette même réforme.’,

read:

read:

‘EPSO/AD/377/20 — FRENCH-LANGUAGE (FR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

1.   Qualifications

You must have a level of education corresponding to completed university studies attested by one of the following qualifications in French, Belgian or Luxembourgish law and in the French language:

Avoir suivi une formation juridique complète, principalement dans un établissement d’enseignement supérieur belge, français ou luxembourgeois où les enseignements sont dispensés en langue française. Par formation juridique complète, il convient d’entendre une formation juridique de cinq années/300 crédits ECTS [European Credit Transfer System], pour les formations achevées depuis l’entrée en vigueur de la réforme de 2004 harmonisant les diplômes d’enseignement supérieur en Europe, ou de quatre ou cinq années pour les formations achevées antérieurement. Cette formation doit, en outre, avoir été sanctionnée par un diplôme correspondant au moins au master 2 (cinq années d’études), pour les diplômes obtenus après l’entrée en vigueur de ladite réforme de 2004, ou à la maîtrise en droit française (quatre années d’études), ou à la licence en droit belge (cinq années d’études), pour les diplômes obtenus avant l’entrée en vigueur de cette même réforme.’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1693442
<SECURITIES>                                      7443100
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9184862
<PP&E>                                            1971201
<DEPRECIATION>                                     819783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11379770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              236052
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           376688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       10672219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11379770
<SALES>                                            394915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   778079
<CGS>                                              156834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      646337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    434410
<INCOME-TAX>                                       145672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                288738
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       288738
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.81
        

</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 80 

Recognizing that Federal law does not prohibit elementary school or secondary 

school students from discussing or sharing information about non-dairy 

milk alternatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2023 

Ms. BROWNLEY (for herself, Mr. CARTER of Louisiana, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) 

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing that Federal law does not prohibit elementary 

school or secondary school students from discussing or 

sharing information about non-dairy milk alternatives. 

Whereas all children deserve healthy, nutritious meals; 

Whereas school meals play an essential role in meeting the 

nutritional needs of children; 

Whereas some families choose plant-based milk to meet the 

nutritional needs of children with milk allergies; 

Whereas cow’s milk allergy is one of the most common food 

allergies reported in infants and young children; 

Whereas plant-based milks are popular for health, ethical, 

and environmental reasons, and some individuals prefer 

the taste of plant-based milk over cow’s milk; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HCON 80 IH 

Whereas some nutritional aspects of many plant-based milks 

are similar to cow’s milk, such as sodium and potassium 

content; 

Whereas the American Society of Nutrition has found that 

most plant-based milks are a healthier choice when it 

comes to fat and calories as compared to whole-fat cow’s 

milk; 

Whereas the First Amendment protects the rights of individuals to discuss food and beverage preferences and nutritional information with their peers, teachers, and school 

officials; and 

Whereas current Department of Agriculture guidelines suggest that cow’s milk is the best for all students, but this 

is clearly not the case for many children: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That— 

3 (1) it is the sense of Congress that nothing in 

4 the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 1750 et seq.) prohibits elementary school 

6 or secondary school students from discussing or 

7 sharing information about non-dairy milk alter8 natives with their classmates on the campus of such 

9 school; 

10 (2) parents and students should be provided 

11 with as much information as possible about school 

12 meal nutrition; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HCON 80 IH 

1 (3) parents and students, in consultation with 

2 their physicians, should be able to have as much 

3 choice as possible in the school lunch program, so 

4 that the individual dietary needs of children can be 

5 better achieved. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### 45.401 Title to Government-furnished property.

The Government retains title to all Government-furnished property until properly disposed of, as authorized by law or regulation. Property that is leased by the Government and subsequently furnished to the contractor for use shall be considered Government-furnished property under the clause 52.245-1, Government Property.
# C_2019370EN.01002901.xml

| 31.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/29

---

Call for proposals for support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy (CAP) for 2020

(2019/C 370/09)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals for information measures relating to the CAP for the 2020 financial year.

Proposals are invited for the following call: IMCAP — Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy (CAP) for 2020

This call for proposals, including deadlines and budgets for the different activities, is available on the Funding & Tenders portal (https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/home), along with information on the related activities and instructions for applicants on how to submit proposals. All this information will be updated as necessary on the same portal.

Funding & Tenders

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willis S., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed May 25, 1978, which revoked a previously imposed sentence of probation and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment. Amended sentence reversed, on the law, and case remitted to the County Court for resentencing (see CPL 380.50; *People v Schiavone,*42 AD2d 738). O’Connor, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.63



 Exhibit 10.63 
 THE USE OF THE FOLLOWING NOTATION IN THIS EXHIBIT INDICATES THAT A CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION: [****]. 
 December 15, 2008 
 VIA ELECTRONIC DELIVERY 
 Mr. Jim Tait 
 Vice President 
 AOL, LLC 
 22000 AOL Way 
 Dulles, Virginia 20036 
  

	Re:	Amended and Restated Agreement for Delivery of Service between Level 3 Communications, LLC (“Level 3”) and America Online, Inc.
(“Customer”) effective as of April 18, 2000, (the “Managed Modem Agreement”) 

 Dear
Mr. Tait: 
 This letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) memorializes our agreement concerning Customer’s desire
to exceed the number of Fixed Ports purchased by Customer pursuant to certain commitments under the Managed Modem Agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Managed Modem Agreement. Specifically
this Agreement modifies that certain Letter Agreement by and between Level 3 and Customer, dated March 7, 2008 (the “March 7 Letter Agreement”). 
  

	1.	Pricing and Billing (Fixed Port With Bursting): Section 6 Pricing of the March 7 Letter Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following Section 6 Pricing and Billing: 

 (a) “Pricing: [****] 
 Burst Charge: [****] 
 For Clarification purposes only, the Burst Charges relative to Level I and Level II markets is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment I. 
 (b) Billing (Fixed Port With Bursting): Effective January 1, 2009, Customer will be billed on a Fixed Port with Bursting on a per port basis. Charges for this Service consists of both
(i) the minimum monthly Port Charge identified above and (ii) a Burst Charge. The Burst Charge shall be billed in arrears and may be identified as a monthly usage charge (MUC) that is attributable to Customer’s Bursting. [****]

  

 1 








 [****] 
  

	2.	Other existing terms and conditions: All other terms and conditions in the Managed Modem Agreement, as amended, not specifically addressed herein will remain in
effect. In the event of any conflicts between the terms of the Managed Modem Agreement and this Letter Agreement, the terms of this Letter Agreement shall govern. 

 If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please execute one copy of this letter and return it to the undersigned at your earliest convenience. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC

	
	/s/ Samantha T. Leapley
	Samantha T. Leapley
	Vice President, Legal

 Accepted and agreed: 
  

	
	 AOL LLC

	
	James W. Tait

  

 2 








 Attachment I 
 [****] 
  

 3 








 [****] 
  

 4 








 [****] 
  

 5
SOLOMON L. MILLS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1266

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed October 20, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Wakulla County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

. Clyde M. Taylor, Jr.

, St. Augustine, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flan agan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed

pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850

. The appellant alleged four

grounds for re lief. We affirm the denial of grounds two through four. However,

we reverse and remand the denial of ground one for the trial court to attach2 portions of the record conclusively refuting the allegation that counsel failed to

inform him of a plea offer, o r to hold an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Michael Brennan.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.