# C_2017157EN.01001101.xml

| 19.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/11

---

Call for Expressions of Interest for the members of the Scientific Committee of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)

Ref.: CEI-SCIE-2017

(2017/C 157/09)

With this call the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) is opening 11 positions in its Scientific Committee. The term of office of the new members will start on 4 June 2018 and end on 3 June 2023. FRA is the European Union’s specialised expert body tasked with providing the EU institutions and the EU Member States (when acting within the scope of EU law) with evidence based advice in the area of fundamental rights.

While being part of the overall EU administration, the Agency is an entirely independent institution located in Vienna. Its current Scientific Committee is an esteemed group of internationally renowned human rights experts. Its members, most of them university professors, come from different disciplines and have held high level positions, including being the Vice-President of the European Court for Human Rights, Chairpersons of National Human Rights Institutions, UN Special Rapporteurs, Members of international monitoring Committees and the like. The Scientific Committee is a hub of outstanding human rights experts that oversees the work of the EU’s human rights institution.

The position of a member of the FRA Scientific Committee is highly prestigious but nevertheless requires full commitment and a considerable investment of time. The Scientific Committee is mandated to guarantee the scientific quality of FRA’s work across the full spectrum of fundamental rights. The members meet at least four times a year at the venue of FRA in Vienna.

1.   THE AGENCY

THE AGENCY

The FRA is an advisory body of the European Union based in Vienna, Austria (1).

1

The objective of the FRA shall be to provide the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and authorities of the Community and its Member States when implementing European Union law with assistance and expertise relating to fundamental rights in order to support them when they take measures or formulate courses of action within their respective spheres of competence to fully respect fundamental rights (2).

2

The Agency focuses on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU and its 28 Member States. Candidate countries and countries which have concluded a stabilisation and association agreement with the EU can be invited to participate (3).

3

The FRA comprises the following bodies:

| | Management Board |
| --- | --- |

Management Board

| | Executive Board |
| --- | --- |

Executive Board

| | Scientific Committee |
| --- | --- |

Scientific Committee

| | Director |
| --- | --- |

Director

2.   THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE

THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE

This call for expressions of interest invites experts, possessing the necessary experience in one or more scientific disciplines in the field of fundamental rights, to express their interest in becoming members of the Scientific Committee of the Agency.

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 1 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 of 15 February 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Regulation’) establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Agency’), the Management Board of the Agency shall appoint a Scientific Committee which shall be comprised of eleven independent persons, highly qualified in the field of fundamental rights.

Role of the Scientific Committee:

Role of the Scientific Committee:

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 5 of the Regulation, the aforementioned Scientific Committee shall be the guarantor of the scientific quality of the Agency’s work.

For that purpose, the Director of the Agency shall involve the Scientific Committee in the preparation of documents drawn up in the context of the tasks the Agency is according to Article 4, paragraph 1(a-f) and (h) of the Regulation entrusted with, namely:

| — | the collection, recording and dissemination of relevant, objective, reliable and comparable information and data on fundamental rights, including results from research and monitoring communicated to the Agency by EU Member States, Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, research centres, national bodies, non-governmental organisations, third countries and international organisations including the competent bodies of the Council of Europe, |
| --- | --- |

—

the collection, recording and dissemination of relevant, objective, reliable and comparable information and data on fundamental rights, including results from research and monitoring communicated to the Agency by EU Member States, Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, research centres, national bodies, non-governmental organisations, third countries and international organisations including the competent bodies of the Council of Europe,

| — | the development of methods and standards to improve the comparability, objectivity and reliability of data on fundamental rights at a European level, in cooperation with the European Commission and the EU Member States, |
| --- | --- |

—

the development of methods and standards to improve the comparability, objectivity and reliability of data on fundamental rights at a European level, in cooperation with the European Commission and the EU Member States,

| — | the carrying out of scientific research and surveys, preparatory studies and feasibility studies on issues related to fundamental rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

the carrying out of scientific research and surveys, preparatory studies and feasibility studies on issues related to fundamental rights,

| — | the formulation and publication of opinions on specific thematic topics related to fundamental rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

the formulation and publication of opinions on specific thematic topics related to fundamental rights,

| — | the publication of an annual report on fundamental rights issues covered by the areas of the Agency’s activity, also highlighting examples of good practice, |
| --- | --- |

—

the publication of an annual report on fundamental rights issues covered by the areas of the Agency’s activity, also highlighting examples of good practice,

| — | the publication of thematic reports based on the Agency’s own analysis, research and surveys, |
| --- | --- |

—

the publication of thematic reports based on the Agency’s own analysis, research and surveys,

| — | the development of a communication strategy and the promotion of dialogue with civil society, in order to raise public awareness of fundamental rights and actively disseminate information about the Agency’s work. |
| --- | --- |

—

the development of a communication strategy and the promotion of dialogue with civil society, in order to raise public awareness of fundamental rights and actively disseminate information about the Agency’s work.

The Scientific Committee also expresses an opinion on the Agency’s Annual Work Programme.

The functioning of the Scientific Committee:

The functioning of the Scientific Committee:

Different from the Management Board, the Scientific Committee is an advisory body that is not involved in the administration and the steering of the Agency. At the same time the Committee is a working body that is involved in the research processes of the Agency. This implies that the members are expected to be fully committed to make a substantial contribution in terms of time and workload to the Agency’s work; with their input being in the form of reasoned arguments concerning the quality of the Agency’s work, which may necessitate detailed written contributions. According to the current working methods, the individual members of the Committee supervise one or more specific research projects as ‘rapporteurs’ from the very inception of the project idea to the publication of the final results. However, decisions concerning the ‘scientific quality of the Agency’s work’ are taken in a collective manner by the Scientific Committee’s members. The Committee is headed by its Chairperson that is elected by the Committee for a term of office of 1 year (4). The Chair is assisted by a contact-point within the Director’s office of the FRA.

4

Composition of the Scientific Committee:

Composition of the Scientific Committee:

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 1 of the Regulation, the Scientific Committee shall be composed of eleven independent persons, highly qualified in the field of fundamental rights. The Management Board shall appoint the members following a transparent call for applications and selection procedure after having consulted the competent committee of the European Parliament (5).

5

The Management Board of the Agency shall ensure even geographical representation in the membership of the Scientific Committee it shall appoint. Furthermore, the Management Board aims to achieve a balanced participation between women and men in the Scientific Committee. It will also pay due attention to the scientific disciplines and specialisations with the aim of covering the different areas as defined by the Agency’s Multiannual Framework.

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 1 of the Regulation, the members of the Agency’s Management Board are precluded from being members of the Scientific Committee.

The members of the Scientific Committee shall be experts in one or more of the disciplines related to or relevant for human rights, inter alia:

| — | social sciences; including candidates with expertise in the fields of research methodologies and cross-national, comparative research, |
| --- | --- |

—

social sciences; including candidates with expertise in the fields of research methodologies and cross-national, comparative research,

| — | law, including comparative constitutional law, EU law and international law, |
| --- | --- |

—

law, including comparative constitutional law, EU law and international law,

| — | political sciences, |
| --- | --- |

—

political sciences,

| — | statistics. |
| --- | --- |

—

statistics.

Term of Office:

Term of Office:

The term of office of the members of the Scientific Committee shall be 5 years. It shall not be renewed. The members of the Scientific Committee shall be independent and they have to comply with the rules of confidentiality.

They may be replaced only at their own request, or in the event of their being permanently prevented from fulfilling their duties. However, where a member no longer meets the criteria of independence, he or she shall forthwith inform the European Commission and the Director of the Agency. Alternatively the Management Board may declare, on a proposal of one third of its members or of the European Commission, a lack of independence and revoke the person concerned. The Management Board shall appoint a new member for the remaining term of office in accordance with the procedure for ordinary members. Where the remaining term of office is less than 2 years, the mandate of the new member may be extended for a full term of 5 years. The list of members of the Scientific Committee shall be made public and shall be updated by the Agency on its website.

Meetings of the Scientific Committee:

Meetings of the Scientific Committee:

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 6 of the Regulation, the Scientific Committee shall meet four times a year in plenary session. The venue of the meetings is the seat of the Agency (Vienna), unless an exception is made. The members are expected to participate in these meetings and to make a substantial contribution in terms of time and workload, including the review of and comments on material submitted to them — which should preferably be in written form and substantiated.

Members of the Scientific Committee shall be entitled to indemnities related to their participation in the activities of the Scientific Committee (6).

6

3.   QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE REQUIRED, CRITERIA OF ASSESSMENT

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE REQUIRED, CRITERIA OF ASSESSMENT

A.   Eligibility criteria

Eligibility criteria

Applicants for membership of the Scientific Committee must fulfil the following four criteria:

| — | having a postgraduate or comparable university degree in a relevant scientific area, |
| --- | --- |

—

having a postgraduate or comparable university degree in a relevant scientific area,

| — | having 7 years of proven professional experience dealing with fundamental rights in the context of disciplines such as the social sciences, political sciences, law and/or statistics — after obtaining the above mentioned degree, |
| --- | --- |

—

having 7 years of proven professional experience dealing with fundamental rights in the context of disciplines such as the social sciences, political sciences, law and/or statistics — after obtaining the above mentioned degree,

| — | nationality of one of the EU Member States or of a state that participates in the work of the FRA as an observer in accordance with Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

nationality of one of the EU Member States or of a state that participates in the work of the FRA as an observer in accordance with Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights,

| — | thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the EU and a satisfactory knowledge of another language of the EU (7). |
| --- | --- |

—

thorough knowledge of one of the official languages of the EU and a satisfactory knowledge of another language of the EU (7).

7

B.   Selection criteria

Selection criteria

ESSENTIAL:

The five essential requirements for the selection of the members of the Scientific Committee are:

five essential requirements

—   
  Scientific excellence
  : scientific excellence strictly related to the fields of the mandate of the Agency, demonstrated by publications in relevant fields or other indicators of relevant professional experience engaging such disciplines as law, social sciences, political sciences, statistics, geography, economics, anthropology or journalism.

Scientific excellence

—   
  Cross-national, comparative experience
  : extensive experience of having worked and/or conducted research in more than one country in fields closely related to the work of the Agency.

Cross-national, comparative experience

—   
  In-depth insight concerning fundamental/human rights in practice
  : extensive experience with respect to legal, social sciences, policy and/or practical implementation of fundamental/human rights in practice — such as experience of fieldwork and data analysis, giving technical advice, legal judgments, or having worked for an international governmental or non-governmental organisation.

In-depth insight concerning fundamental/human rights in practice

—   
  Delivery of opinions and/or recommendations
  : Experience in drafting opinions, or recommendations at national or international level related to the fields of interest of the Agency.

Delivery of opinions and/or recommendations

—   
  Excellent Scientific English
  : an excellent knowledge of written and spoken English. In the Scientific Committee, English (8) is the language used in oral as well as in written communication.

Excellent Scientific English

8

ADVANTAGEOUS:

The following four criteria will be considered as added advantages:

advantages

| — | holding or having held a permanent professorship or other research driven positions in an academic institution, |
| --- | --- |

—

holding or having held a permanent professorship or other research driven positions in an academic institution,

| — | a doctoral degree, |
| --- | --- |

—

a doctoral degree,

| — | professional experience in a multidisciplinary environment, preferably in an international context, |
| --- | --- |

—

professional experience in a multidisciplinary environment, preferably in an international context,

| — | experience in disseminating research findings to multiple audiences in an innovative and efficient manner. |
| --- | --- |

—

experience in disseminating research findings to multiple audiences in an innovative and efficient manner.

In particular the compliance with the above mentioned essential requirements will be assessed according to the following scale of merit points, facts and evidence:

1.   Scientific excellence (0-30 points)

Scientific excellence (0-30 points)

| — | relevant scientific publications — minimum of 10 high quality publications, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant scientific publications — minimum of 10 high quality publications,

| — | relevant expert opinions, recommendations or conclusions delivered to public authorities, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant expert opinions, recommendations or conclusions delivered to public authorities,

| — | relevant research projects in different EU Member States, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant research projects in different EU Member States,

| — | relevant teaching in different EU Member States and experience in chairing at international conferences, in participating in international working groups and in multidisciplinary projects. |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant teaching in different EU Member States and experience in chairing at international conferences, in participating in international working groups and in multidisciplinary projects.

2.   Cross-national, comparative experience (0-15 points)

Cross-national, comparative experience (0-15 points)

| — | relevant experience of fieldwork, including, e.g. multinational surveys, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant experience of fieldwork, including, e.g. multinational surveys,

| — | relevant experience in giving policy and legal advice in an international or transnational context, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant experience in giving policy and legal advice in an international or transnational context,

| — | relevant experience in comparison of political systems and comparative constitutional law (EU). |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant experience in comparison of political systems and comparative constitutional law (EU).

3.   In-depth insight concerning fundamental/human rights in practice and policy (0-15 points)

In-depth insight concerning fundamental/human rights in practice and policy (0-15 points)

| — | relevant experience in public administration or policy, including holding or having held leading positions, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant experience in public administration or policy, including holding or having held leading positions,

| — | relevant experience in the Judiciary, including holding or having held leading positions, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant experience in the Judiciary, including holding or having held leading positions,

| — | relevant experience in Non-Governmental Organizations, including holding or having held leading positions, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant experience in Non-Governmental Organizations, including holding or having held leading positions,

| — | relevant experience in National Human Rights Institutions or other human rights bodies at national level, including holding or having held leading positions, |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant experience in National Human Rights Institutions or other human rights bodies at national level, including holding or having held leading positions,

| — | relevant fundamental rights experience at international level, including holding or having held leading positions. |
| --- | --- |

—

relevant fundamental rights experience at international level, including holding or having held leading positions.

4.   Delivery of opinions and/or recommendations/conclusions (0-15 points)

Delivery of opinions and/or recommendations/conclusions (0-15 points)

| — | extensive experience in translating scientific research into relevant recommendations for practice, |
| --- | --- |

—

extensive experience in translating scientific research into relevant recommendations for practice,

| — | extensive experience in providing concise and policy relevant expert-opinions to public administrations and NGOs, |
| --- | --- |

—

extensive experience in providing concise and policy relevant expert-opinions to public administrations and NGOs,

| — | extensive experience as a scientific editor, |
| --- | --- |

—

extensive experience as a scientific editor,

| — | experience in communicating fundamental rights to a broader public. |
| --- | --- |

—

experience in communicating fundamental rights to a broader public.

5.   Excellent Scientific English (0-10 points)

Excellent Scientific English (0-10 points)

| — | excellent scientific written English, |
| --- | --- |

—

excellent scientific written English,

| — | extensive experience in scientific writing and editing in English. |
| --- | --- |

—

extensive experience in scientific writing and editing in English.

The criteria indicated as advantageous will be scored 0-5 points in total.

The criteria indicated as advantageous will be scored 0-5 points in total

The need to ensure a fair geographical and gender balance shall also be taken into account in the selection phase.

4.   SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS

SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS

Candidates are requested to submit their application electronically through the Agency’s website: http://fra.europa.eu/en/about-fra/recruitment/vacancies

Only online applications will be accepted. An application will be deemed admissible only if it includes:

Only

| — | a letter of interest (maximum one page), |
| --- | --- |

—

a letter of interest (maximum one page),

letter of interest

| — | a registration form provided on the Agency’s website in the page related to this Call for Expressions of Interest, |
| --- | --- |

—

a registration form provided on the Agency’s website in the page related to this Call for Expressions of Interest,

a registration form

| — | a list of scientific publications in books and peer-reviewed journals, including the abstracts of the five most relevant articles (three of these abstracts should be in English). Further supporting documents may be requested at a later stage of the selection. |
| --- | --- |

—

a list of scientific publications in books and peer-reviewed journals, including the abstracts of the five most relevant articles (three of these abstracts should be in English). Further supporting documents may be requested at a later stage of the selection.

list of scientific publications

the abstracts of the five most relevant articles (three of these abstracts should be in English)

Clarifications on the call and the applications procedure can be requested at the following address:

selection-scientific-committee@fra.europa.eu

5.   SELECTION PROCEDURE, APPOINTMENT AND TERM

SELECTION PROCEDURE, APPOINTMENT AND TERM

Pre-selection:

Pre-selection:

The Director of the Agency shall prepare and organise the work for the pre-selection of the members of the Scientific Committee. He or she shall chair a pre-selection panel, composed of the Heads of Department of the Agency and a person appointed for the purpose by the Council of Europe. Two members of the FRA Management Board may attend the pre-selection panel as observers.

The pre-selection panel shall verify the eligibility of the candidates, in accordance with the eligibility requirements. Failure to comply with one of these requirements will result in the exclusion of the concerned candidate from the next steps of the selection process.

The pre-selection panel shall then assess each eligible candidate according to the requirements for selection. It will draw up an ‘Individual Assessment Form’ for each candidate which will include a short comment, highlighting the specific values/shortcomings of the candidate concerned.

The Director shall present the results of the pre-selection process to the FRA Executive Board, including information on the candidates deemed ineligible.

Selection:

Selection:

The Executive Board shall assess all the candidates on the basis of the established selection requirements.

In this assessment the Executive Board shall take into account:

| — | the work of the pre-selection panel, |
| --- | --- |

—

the work of the pre-selection panel,

| — | the need that the areas of expertise of the members of the Scientific Committee shall cover the most relevant fields of FRA’s work, |
| --- | --- |

—

the need that the areas of expertise of the members of the Scientific Committee shall cover the most relevant fields of FRA’s work,

| — | the need to ensure even geographical and gender balance. |
| --- | --- |

—

the need to ensure even geographical and gender balance.

The Executive Board shall submit to the Management Board a list of most eligible candidates. This list should include more than 11 and fewer than 22 names. This list will also include merit points and a conclusion concerning the suitability as a member of the Scientific Committee for each candidate.

The Chair of the Executive Board shall present the results of the selection process to the Management Board, including a record of the candidates not included in the lists mentioned above as well as on candidates deemed ineligible.

The Agency’s operational services shall provide technical and logistical support for the selection process.

Appointment:

Appointment:

On the basis of the list submitted by the Executive Board, the Agency’s Management Board shall appoint the members of the Scientific Committee, after having consulted the competent committee of the European Parliament. The candidates not appointed shall be put on a reserve list.

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 2 of the Regulation, members will be appointed for a 5-year term, which shall not be renewable.

The reserve list shall be valid for the duration of the term of the appointed Scientific Committee. In case of a vacancy, the Management Board shall appoint a new member from the reserve list. The filling in of a vacancy shall be for the rest of the duration of the term of the Scientific Committee. However, in accordance with Article 14, paragraph 1 of the Regulation, the Management Board shall follow a process of appointment identical to the one followed for the appointment of the original member including consultation of the LIBE-Committee of the European Parliament. Potential candidates should be aware that as a consequence of the public procedure of the LIBE Committee sessions the LIBE-Committee may make their names of the candidates and their CVs public. Potential candidates have a right to object to the publication of their data by sending an email to selection-scientific-committee@fra.europa.eu

6.   DECLARATION OF COMMITMENT, INTEREST AND CONFIDENTIALITY

DECLARATION OF COMMITMENT, INTEREST AND CONFIDENTIALITY

The members of the Scientific Committee are appointed on a personal basis. Members shall undertake to act independently of any external influence. For this reason they will be requested to make a declaration of commitment and a declaration of interest (9).

9

A declaration of confidentiality will be requested as well in order to comply with the rules of confidentiality when dealing with information specifically identified by the Agency as ‘restricted or confidential’ (10).

10

7.   EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES

EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES

The FRA urges anyone meeting the eligibility criteria and interested in becoming a member of the FRA Scientific Committee to apply.

The FRA is an equal opportunities institution and ensures that its selection procedures do not discriminate on the basis of gender, colour, racial, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation, or any other status.

FRA is committed to achieving gender balance and therefore female candidates are particularly encouraged to apply.

8.   PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA

PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA

Please note that FRA will not return applications to candidates. The personal information FRA requests from candidates will be processed in line with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (11). This applies in particular to the confidentiality and security of such data.

11

Personal data shall be processed solely for the purpose of the selection procedure. Should the candidate have any query concerning the processing of his/her personal data, he/she shall address them to the following address:

selection-scientific-committee@fra.europa.eu

Candidates have also the right to have recourse at any time to the European Data protection Supervisor http://www.edps.europa.eu

9.   DEADLINE

DEADLINE

The closing date for submission of applications is 7 July 2017 at 13:00 (Local time, GMT +1).

7 July 2017

13:00

Please note that due to the large number of applications we receive, the system may face problems in processing such amounts of data when reaching the deadline for submission of applications. We therefore advise to apply well ahead of the deadline.

Please note that due to the large number of applications we receive, the system may face problems in processing such amounts of data when reaching the deadline for submission of applications. We therefore advise to apply well ahead of the deadline.

---

(1)  Its founding regulation adopted by the Council of the European Union was published in OJ L 53, 22.2.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 of 15 February 2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

2

(3)  See Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 168/2007.

3

(4)  Article 19 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

4

(5)  The Committee for Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (‘LIBE Committee’).

5

(6)  Article 24 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; experts invited to attend meetings.

6

(7)  Note: the working language for all meetings and deliverables — for both the FRA and members of the Scientific Committee — is English. The FRA translates only the final versions of its deliverables into other EU languages, therefore, candidates are expected to have a very high standard of English — listening, reading and writing — as translation and interpretation are not possible with respect to the work of the Committee.

7

(8)  Article 4(2) of the Agency’s rules of procedure.

8

(9)  Article 27(2) of Rules of Procedure.

9

(10)  Article 26(2) of Rules of Procedure.

10

(11)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

11

---