alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### United Fig and Date Company, appellee, v. Wakefield Peanut Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,579.

Action for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles E. McKinley, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 25, 1926.

Weil, Ward & Adams, for appellant.

Newman, Poppenhusen, Stern *&*Johnston, for appellee; Henry J. Brandt, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 98 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.98

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor 
 Relations Board relating to ``Standard for Determining Joint Employer 
                                Status''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to 
``Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status'' (88 Fed. Reg. 73946 
(October 27, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Lawrence Segrete, Doing Business as Astor Display Co., Appellant, v Maurice Zimmerman et al., Respondents.

— In an action to recover the balance due on a contract or, in the alternative, to recover for the reasonable value of work, labor, services and materials, plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 26, 1978, which, *inter alia,*granted the branches of defendants’ motion which sought (1) summary judgment and (2) leave to serve an amended answer, including a second counterclaim. Order and judgment modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor a provision denying the branch of defendants’ motion which sought leave to amend their answer and (2) deleting the sixth decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor a provision that the cause of action of the defendants against the plaintiff, denominated *1000as a first counterclaim, be severed and that this action continue as to such counterclaim. As so modified, order and judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendants retained plaintiff to provide labor and material for certain improvements on their home in Nassau County. The work was performed by plaintiff, although he was not licensed to conduct a home improvement business in Nassau County during the relevant period (see Local Laws, 1970, No. 6 of the County of Nassau). While the work progressed, defendants paid $12,000 on account, an amount which, they contend, was the total amount owed. Plaintiff alleges, however, that defendants agreed to pay him a total of $29,856.21. In this action he seeks to recover $17,856.21 allegedly due under the contract, or, alternatively, the same amount under a theory of *quantum meruit.*Special Term granted the branch of defendants’ motion which sought summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff, since he was not licensed to perform home improvement work in Nassau County, could recover in neither contract nor *quantum meruit.*The court also granted defendants leave to amend their answer to allege an additional counterclaim seeking recovery of the $12,000 which they had paid. Special Term properly dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for he may not recover in either contract or *quantum meruit*(see *Richards Conditioning Corp. v Oleet,*21 NY2d 895; *BufFoleno v Denning,*82 Mise 2d 472; contra *Lindner Appraisal Corp. v Frewil Corp.,*72 Mise 2d 1041). Special Term erred, however, in granting defendants leave to amend their answer. Since defendants have had the benefit of plaintiff’s work, they are not entitled to recover payments which they have already made. The parties, in these circumstances, should be left as they are (see *Johnston v Dahlgren,*166 NY 354; *Host v Gauntlett,*73 Mise 2d 96). Rabin, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### KEOUGH, Appellant, v. PURCELL, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

September 26, 1906.)

Action by James Keough against Kate Purcell.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### 3004.470-1 Scope.

This section implements DHS policies for assuring adequate security of unclassified facilities, information resources, and controlled unclassified information (CUI) during the acquisition lifecycle.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carl F. Fahrenkrug, Chief Executive Officer of Microwave Filter Company,
Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
    September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
    78m or 78o(d); and

(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Dated: December 17, 2004                        /s/ Carl F. Fahrenkrug
                                                Carl F. Fahrenkrug
                                                Chief Executive Officer

<page>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard L. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Microwave Filter Company, Inc.
(the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
    September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
    78m or 78o(d); and

(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Dated: December 17, 2004                        /s/ Richard L. Jones
                                                Richard L. Jones
                                                Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017327EN.01000901.xml

| 29.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/9

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 327/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national side features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Finland

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The Finnish nature

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The inner part of the coin has a design forming a cartographic likeness of the moon seen from Harmaja, Finland. On the top of the moon there is a crow sitting on a branch. The year of issuance ‘2017’ is placed at the center bottom. At the center left is the indication of the issuing country ‘FI’. The mint mark is placed center right.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : October 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
<PAGE> 73


                                                                EXHIBIT 12.2

                PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA (CONSOLIDATED)
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
                            (Thousands Except Ratio)
                                   (Unaudited)


Operating Income                                                     $99,671

Adjustments:
  Income taxes                                                        34,209
  Provision for deferred income taxes                                  3,123
  Deferred investment tax credits                                     (2,784)
  Other income and deductions                                            138
  Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
    used during construction                                           2,222
                                                                   ---------

       Earnings                                                     $136,579
                                                                   =========

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                                         $30,676
  Amortization of debt issuance cost                                   1,749
  Other interest                                                       4,186
                                                                   ---------

       Fixed Charges                                                 $36,611
                                                                   =========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                      3.73
                                                                   =========
----

| CLECO POWER LLC   | EXHIBIT32(b) |
|-----------------------------|--------------|

| Cleco Power LLC                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO                     |
| 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,                       |
| AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO                        |
| SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cleco PowerLLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Michael H. Madison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, KathleenF. Nolen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                     |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

| /s/  Michael H. Madison                             |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael H.  Madison    Chief Executive Officer |

 

| /s/  Kathleen F. Nolen                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Kathleen F.  Nolen    Senior Vice President and     Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |   March 12, 2010 |   |   /s/ Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.          |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                  |   | Lloyd C. Hillard, Jr.                     |   |
|   |                  |   | President and CEO                         |   |
|   |                  |   |                                      |   |
|   |                  |   |                                      |   |
|   |                  |   |                                      |   |
| Date:  |   March 12, 2010 |   |   /s/ Doug Carpenter            |   |
|   |                  |   | C. Douglas Carpenter                      |   |
|   |                  |   | Senior Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |   |

----
About FOIA | About the Privacy Act | FOIA Library**Making a Request** | FAQs | Contacts | Links

## Making a Request

### Do you want to request information about the U.S. Department of Education?

This is a request that should be made under FOIA. You may be able to access the information you need on the Internet without making a FOIA request. Before making a FOIA request, you should browse our FOIA Library and search the ED.gov website.

- FOIA request and appeal instructions

### Do you want to request information about yourself?

This is a request that should be made under the Privacy Act. Privacy Act requests can be made only by U.S. citizens or aliens lawfully admitted for permanent U.S. residence who are seeking information about themselves in a system of records maintained under their names or other personal identifiers.

- Privacy Act request instructions

### Which Act should I use?

The access provisions of the FOIA and the Privacy Act overlap in part. The two laws have different procedures and different exemptions. As a result, sometimes information exempt under one law will be releasable under the other.

In order to take maximum advantage of the laws, individuals seeking information should ordinarily cite both laws. Requests by an individual for information that does not relate solely to him or herself should be made only under the FOIA. 

ED will automatically handle requests from individuals in a way that will maximize the amount of information that is releasable. However, a requester should still make a request in a manner that is most advantageous and that fully protects all available legal rights. A requester who has any doubts about which law to use should always cite both the FOIA and the Privacy Act when seeking documents.

**Learn about FOIA Fee Regulations**
#### 419.201 General policy.

It is the policy of USDA to provide maximum practicable contracting and subcontracting opportunities to small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), HUBZone small business, women-owned business (WOB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), and service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) concerns.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Elementary and Secondary Education Act Provisions Prohibiting Aiding and Abetting of Sexual Misconduct in Schools      

# Resource: Elementary and Secondary Education Act Provisions Prohibiting Aiding and Abetting of Sexual Misconduct in Schools

This fact sheet (PDF, 4 pages) accompanies the corresponding report (PDF, 106 pages) and “Lessons from the Field” webinar. The fact sheet outlines state laws, policies, and employment provisions prohibiting aiding and abetting of sexual misconduct in schools. **Learn more** (PDF, 4 pages).
##### 



Exhibit 31.4

3333 HOLDING CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 3333 Holding Corporation and
Subsidiary and Centex Development Company, L.P. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-Q
for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd D. Newman, Chief
Financial Officer of 3333 Holding Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 3333
Holding Corporation and Subsidiary.

/s/ TODD D. NEWMANTodd D. NewmanChief Financial OfficerDate: February 9, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Dr. G. Neil Garrett DDS, PC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05638

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Top Medical Products, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, August 13, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Gary Feinerman: Plaintiff having filed a notice

of voluntary dismissal [16], the status hearing scheduled for 9/6/2012 [14] is stricken. All

pending motions [4] are denied as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice by judge's

staff. (srb,)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05638 Document #: 17 Filed: 08/13/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:72
# Predominantly Black Institutions (PBI) Program

# Formula Grants

## FY 2020 Non Competing Continuation Awards
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




Time Warner Cable Inc.

Description of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors




     In addition to the Non-Employee Director compensation described in the section titled
“Director Compensation” in the Company’s Proxy Statement dated April 20, 2009, on July 30, 2009,
the Company’s Board of Directors approved, commencing in 2009, an additional annual cash retainer
of $20,000 for the Lead Director, $10,000 for the Chair of the Finance Committee and $5,000 for
each member of the Finance Committee, prorated and retroactive to their dates of service.
Exhibit 32.1

This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companies (as defined below) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Reports), I, Michael G. Morris, the chief executive officer of

American Electric Power Company, Inc.AEP Generating Company AEP Texas Central CompanyAEP Texas North Company Appalachian Power CompanyColumbus Southern Power CompanyIndiana Michigan Power Company Kentucky Power CompanyOhio Power Company Public Service Company of OklahomaSouthwestern Electric Power Company

(the Companies), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.

/s/ Michael G. Morris

---

Michael G. Morris November 5, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.