alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.Computation
 of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
EXHIBIT 12 (i)  2008

2007

Year Ended December 31,3 Months
 Ended
 Sep 30

9 Months
 Ended
 Sep 30

12 Months
 Ended
 Sep 30

3 Months
 Ended
 Sep 30

9 Months
 Ended
 Sep 30

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003Earnings: ($000)A.

Net income from
 Continuing Operations

$
2,885

$
23,856

$
35,276

$
4,329

$
31,216

$
42,636

$
43,084

$
44,291

$
42,423

$
43,985B.

Preferred Stock
 Dividends


242


727


970


242


727


970


970


970


970


1,387C.

Federal and State
 Income Tax


1,193


14,102


19,859


1,885


16,141


21,898


23,769


25,819


31,256


30,435Less
Income from
 Equity Investments


123


459


639


171


1,715


1,895


1,810


1,456


922


865Plus
Cash Distribution
 from Equity Investments


913


2,294


2,978


922


2,743


3,427


1,005


1,833


1,776


1,249D.

Earnings before
 Income Taxes and Equity Inv.

$
5,110

$
40,520

$
58,444

$
7,207

$
49,112

$
67,036

$
67,018

$
71,457

$
75,503

$
76,191E.

Fixed ChargesInterest on
 Mortgage Bonds





























570Interest on
 Other-Long-Term Debt


4,926


15,064


20,114


4,616


13,603


18,653


16,425


13,826


11,488


10,699Other Interest


1,413


3,826


4,903


1,323


3,302


4,379


3,622


2,577


5,517


9,828Interest Portion
 of Rents(1)


327


979


1,366


297


891


1,278


1,112


1,077


1,192


1,040Amortization of
 Premium & Expense on Debt


244


732


975


236


720


963


991


1,043


1,066


1,159Preferred Stock
 Dividends Requirements of Central Hudson


375


1,136


1,486


363


1,066


1,423


1,409


1,458


1,594


2,243Total Fixed Charges

$
7,285

$
21,737

$
28,844

$
6,835

$
19,582

$
26,696

$
23,559

$
19,981

$
20,857

$
25,539Less
Preferred Stock
 Dividends Requirements of Central Hudson


375


1,136


1,486


363


1,066


1,423


1,409


1,458


1,594


2,243F.

Total Earnings

$
12,020

$
61,121

$
85,802

$
13,679

$
67,628

$
92,309

$
89,168

$
89,980

$
94,766

$
99,487Preferred
 Dividend Requirements:G.

Allowance for
 Preferred Stock Dividends Under IRC Sec. 247

$
242

$
727

$
970

$
242

$
727

$
970

$
970

$
970

$
970

$
1,387H.

Less Allowable
 Dividend Deduction


(32
)

(96
)

(127
)

(32
)

(96
)

(127
)

(127
)

(127
)

(127
)

(127
)I.

Net Subject to
 Gross-Up


210


631


843


210


631


843


843


843


843


1,260J.

Ratio of Earnings
 before Income Taxes and Equity Inv. To Net Income (D/(A+B))


1.634


1.648


1.612


1.577


1.537


1.537


1.521


1.579


1.740


1.679K.

Preferred
 Dividend (Pre-tax) (I x J)


343


1,040


1,359


331


970


1,296


1,282


1,331


1,467


2,116L.

Plus Allowable
 Dividend Deduction


32


96


127


32


96


127


127


127


127


127M.

Preferred Dividend
 Factor


375


1,136


1,486


363


1,066


1,423


1,409


1,458


1,594


2,243N.

Ratio of Earnings
 to Fixed Charges (F/E)


1.6


2.8


3.0


2.0


3.5


3.5


3.8


4.5


4.5


3.9  (1)
The percentage of rent
 included in the fixed charges calculation is a reasonable approximation of
 the interest factor. - 96 -
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 13 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 13

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   relating to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate 
  contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections and to 
        enact public financing systems for political campaigns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

 Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mr. Phillips, Mr. McGovern, and Ms. Jayapal) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   relating to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate 
  contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections and to 
        enact public financing systems for political campaigns.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Congress and the States may regulate and impose 
reasonable viewpoint-neutral limitations on the raising and spending of 
money by candidates and others to influence elections.
    ``Section 2. Congress and the States may regulate and enact systems 
of public campaign financing, including those designed to restrict the 
influence of private wealth by offsetting the raising and spending of 
money by candidates and others to influence elections with increased 
public funding.
    ``Section 3. Congress and the States shall have power to implement 
and enforce this article by appropriate legislation, and may 
distinguish between natural persons and corporations or other 
artificial entities created by law, including by prohibiting such 
entities from spending money to influence elections.
    ``Section 4. Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant 
Congress or the States the power to abridge the freedom of the 
press.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert O., Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed October 26, 1977, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender. Sentences affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
# C_2021117EN.01000401.xml

| 6.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1 April 2021

(2021/C 117/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1746 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4379 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85195 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2753 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1099 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 148,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0408 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,085 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 361,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6089 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9088 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,5903 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5500 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4787 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1346 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6806 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5801 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 328,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2074 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7195 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5705 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 068,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8693 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,076 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 89,5944 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,730 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,6149 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,8792 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,2275 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1746

JPY

Japanese yen

130,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4379

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85195

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2753

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1099

ISK

Iceland króna

148,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0408

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,085

HUF

Hungarian forint

361,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6089

RON

Romanian leu

4,9088

TRY

Turkish lira

9,5903

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5500

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4787

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1346

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6806

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5801

KRW

South Korean won

1 328,36

ZAR

South African rand

17,2074

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7195

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5705

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 068,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8693

PHP

Philippine peso

57,076

RUB

Russian rouble

89,5944

THB

Thai baht

36,730

BRL

Brazilian real

6,6149

MXN

Mexican peso

23,8792

INR

Indian rupee

86,2275

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 406.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

The Senior Procurement Executive is authorized to make determinations pursuant to FAR 6.202(a) and sign the determination and findings required by FAR 6.202(b).
# C_2017143EN.01000201.xml

| 6.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8134 — Siemens/Gamesa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 143/03)

On 13 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8134. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8134. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Chattem,
Inc.'s unaudited financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                     15,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,815
<PP&E>                                          27,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,009
<BONDS>                                        139,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,104
<OTHER-SE>                                         116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,372
<SALES>                                        106,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,033
<CGS>                                           29,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,370)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
NO. 07-11-0132-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL D 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2011 

______________________________ 

JESUS CAVAZOS, APPELLANT 

V. 

PAY AND SAVE, INC. D/B/A LOWE'S MARKETPLACE, APPELLEE 

_________________________________ 

FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; 

NO. 2010-550,659; HONORABLE WILLIAM C. SOWDER, JUDGE PRESIDING 

_______________________________ 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

DISSENTING OPINION 

I respectfully dissent. While I do agree that the partial reporter's record obligates 

us to presume that the record supports the trial court's judgment, Richards v. Schion, 

969 S.W.2d 131, 133 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, no pet.) (holding that "[w]hen 

an appellant appeals with a partial reporter's record but does not provide the list of 

points as required by rule 34.6(c)(1), it creates the presumption that the omitted portions 

support the trial court's findings"), I would not interpret the Texas Supreme Court's 

decision in Haygood v. De Escabedo, No. 09-0377, 2011 Tex. LEXIS 514 (Tex. July 1, 
 2

2011), as obligating us to presume that a plaintiff must first prove to a jury the amount of 

medical or health care expenses actually paid or incurred in order to arrive at a verdict. 

Under the facts of this case, we must conclude that the trial court, after applying § 

41.015 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code,1

 found that the evidence supported a 

recovery of damages totaling $3,647.75. In a comparative negligence case, because a 

court is required to reduce the amount of recoverable damages by a percentage equal 

to the claimant's percentage of responsibility, and because the jury found Cavazos to be 

49% responsible for his own damages, the trial court should have entered a judgment 

awarding Cavazos damages of $1,860.35. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 33.012 

(West 2008). Furthermore, a recalculation of damages requires that the trial court 

recalculate prejudgment interest. 

Conclusion 

 Accordingly, I would reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for 

further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

 Patrick A. Pirtle 

 Justice 

 

1

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 41.015 (West 2008). The Final Judgment entered in this case 

specifically recites that the trial court applied § 41.015.
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of International Lease Finance Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual    report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this annual report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual    report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that    has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially    affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial    reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal controls over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: March 9, 2007 /s/  Steven    F. Udvar-Hazy    Steven F. Udvar-Hazy*Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer*
#### 409.406 Debarment.
Exhibit
32.5








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CILCORP
INC.


(required
by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)








In
connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2008 of CILCORP Inc. (the “Registrant”) as filed by the Registrant with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), each
undersigned officer of the Registrant does hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.










Date:  August 8,
2008










/s/ Gary L.
Rainwater


Gary L.
Rainwater


Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)











/s/ Warner L.
Baxter


Warner L.
Baxter


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           April is National Minority Health Month      

# April is National Minority Health Month

April is National Minority Health Month, and this webpage explains the month’s goal of reducing health disparities among racial and ethnic minorities. This year’s theme, Give Your Community a Boost!, focuses on the continued importance of COVID-19 vaccination, COVID-19 boosters, and sharing credible information as important tools to end the COVID-19 pandemic that has disproportionately affected communities of color. **Learn more.**
32.006-5 Reporting. ( a ) In accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4506(h), the head of an agency, other than the Department of Defense, shall prepare a report for each fiscal year in which a recommendation has been received pursuant to 32.006-4(a). Reports within the Department of Defense shall be prepared in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3806(h).
( b ) In accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4506(h) and 10 U.S.C. 3806(h), each report shall contain— ( 1 ) Each recommendation made by the remedy coordination official;
( 2 ) The actions taken on the recommendation(s), with reasons for such actions; and
( 3 ) An assessment of the effects of each action on the Government.
[60 FR 49729, Sept. 26, 1995, as amended at 79 FR 24211, Apr. 29, 2014; 87 FR 73899, Dec. 1, 2022]
#### 49.001 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Other work* means any current or scheduled work of the contractor, whether Government or commercial, other than work related to the terminated contract.

*Plant clearance period,* as used in this subpart, means the period beginning on the effective date of contract completion or termination and ending 90 days (or such longer period as may be agreed to) after receipt by the contracting officer of acceptable inventory schedules for each property classification. The final phase of the plant clearance period means that period after receipt of acceptable inventory schedules.

*Settlement agreement* means a written agreement in the form of a contract modification settling all or a severable portion of a settlement proposal.

*Settlement proposal* means a proposal for effecting settlement of a contract terminated in whole or in part, submitted by a contractor or subcontractor in the form, and supported by the data, required by this part. A settlement proposal is included within the generic meaning of the word *claim* under false claims acts (see 18 U.S.C. 287 and 31 U.S.C. 3729).

*Unsettled contract change* means any contract change or contract term for which a definitive modification is required but has not been executed.

[48 FR 42443, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 2666, Jan. 17, 1986; 66 FR 2134, Jan. 10, 2001; 67 FR 43514, June 27, 2002; 69 FR 17748, Apr. 5, 2004]