alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021012EN.01000301.xml

| 12.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/3

---

Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

(2021/C 12/03)

I.   Name of the EGTC, address and contact point (as it is currently in the EGTC register)

Official name: European Urban Knowledge Network European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation Limited

Registered office: PO Box 90750, 2509 LT The Hague, The Netherlands

Person responsible (Director): Mart Grisel

Email address: info@eukn.org

Internet address of the Grouping: www.eukn.eu

II.   Changes concerning the name, director, registered office, internet address of the EGTC

Modification of the registered office’s address: Fluwelen Burgwal 58, 2511 CJ The Hague, The Netherlands

Email address: secretariat@eukn.eu

III.   New members

Official name: Kingdom of Spain, Relevant public authority responsible for urban policy: Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda

Registered office: Paseo de la Castellana 67, 28071 Madrid, Spain

Website: www.mitma.es

Type of member: Member State

Country: ES

Official name: Republic of Poland, Relevant public authority responsible for urban policy: Ministry of Development Funds and Regional Policy

Registered office: Wspólna 2/4, 00-926 Warsaw, Poland

Website: www.mfipr.gov.pl

Type of member: Member State

Country: PL

Official name: Republic of Slovenia, Relevant public authority responsible for urban policy: Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning

Registered office: Dunajska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Website: www.gov.si

Type of member: Member State

Country: SI

---
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 16 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States extending 

the right to vote to citizens sixteen years of age or older. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2023 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. BOWMAN, Mr. 

CASTEN, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. MOULTON, Ms. 

PRESSLEY, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. TLAIB, Mrs. TRAHAN, and Ms. 

OCASIO-CORTEZ) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States extending the right to vote to citizens sixteen 

years of age or older. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 16 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The twenty-sixth article of amendment 

5 to the Constitution of the United States is hereby re6 pealed. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The right of citizens of the United 

8 States, who are sixteen years of age or older, to vote shall 

9 not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any 

10 State on account of age. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress shall have power to en12 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2021054EN.01000301.xml

| 16.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 February 2021

(2021/C 54/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2129 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4366 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87225 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0435 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0802 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 155,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1963 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,682 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 358,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4864 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8753 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,4418 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5602 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5346 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4033 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6785 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6046 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5006 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8332 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5720 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 857,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8934 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,136 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 88,9548 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,254 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,5134 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,1825 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,0680 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2129

JPY

Japanese yen

127,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4366

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87225

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0435

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0802

ISK

Iceland króna

155,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1963

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,682

HUF

Hungarian forint

358,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4864

RON

Romanian leu

4,8753

TRY

Turkish lira

8,4418

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5602

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5346

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4033

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6785

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6046

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,12

ZAR

South African rand

17,5006

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8332

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5720

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 857,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8934

PHP

Philippine peso

58,136

RUB

Russian rouble

88,9548

THB

Thai baht

36,254

BRL

Brazilian real

6,5134

MXN

Mexican peso

24,1825

INR

Indian rupee

88,0680

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

WESTERN DIVISION

LAVERTIS STEWART (A-15380) , ) 

 )

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 12 C 50273

 )

v. )

 ) Judge Philip G. Reinhard

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY as )

Special Representative for the Estate of )

ANTREAS MESROBIAN; JILL WAHL; )

IMHOTEP CARTER; WEXFORD HEALTH )

SOURCES, INC.; ARTHUR FUNK; JOHN )

DOE TWO; JOHN DOE THREE; JOHN DOE )

FOUR; JOHN DOE FIVE; JOHN DOE SIX; )

JOHN DOE SEVEN; JOHN DOE EIGHT; )

JOHN DOE NINE; JOHN DOE TEN; JOHN )

DOE ELEVEN; JOHN DOE TWELVE; JOHN )

DOE THIRTEEN; JOHN DOE FOURTEEN; )

and JOHN DOE FIFTEEN, )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

On June 10, 2015, Magistrate Judge Johnston entered a report and recommendation [163]

recommending that the motion to vacate the April 17, 2015 order appointing Evanston Insurance

Companyas special representative and enter a new order reappointingEvanston Insurance Company

as special representative to allow Evanston Insurance Company to appeal under 28 USC 1292(a)(1)

[160] be denied. No objection has been filed. The court has reviewed the records and accepts the

report and recommendation. Evanston Insurance Company’s motion [160] is hereby denied.

Date: 7/01/2015 ENTER:

 

 United States District Court Judge

 Electronic Notices. (LC)

1
32.706-2 Clauses for limitation of cost or funds. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-20, Limitation of Cost, in solicitations and contracts if a fully funded cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated, whether or not the contract provides for payment of a fee.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-22, Limitation of Funds, in solicitations and contracts if an incrementally funded cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated.
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 72 FR 27385, May 15, 2007. Redesignated at 78 FR 37688, June 21, 2013]
Additional	Information:

Section	333	Exemption	Application	for	Commercial	Operations	of	Unmanned	Aircraft	

Filed	by	Eide	Communications,	Inc.	using	DJI	PHANTOM	2,	

DJI	INSPIRE	1,	DJI	S800,	Align	690L,	DJI	F550,	DJI	F450,	DJI	S900,	DJI	S1000

Charles	Eide
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #16858 and #16859; Florida Disaster Number FL-00164]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Florida dated 01/28/2021. *Incident:*
                         Tropical Storm Eta. *Incident Period:*
                         11/09/2020 through 11/12/2020.
 DATES: Issued on 01/28/2021. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/29/2021. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/28/2021.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Pinellas. *Contiguous Counties:* Florida: Hillsborough, Pasco.
                    ( print page 8079) The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.250Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.125Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 16858 8 and for economic injury is 16859 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Tami Perriello, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-02215 Filed 2-2-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
-82 -80 -78 -76

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
#### 442.1502 Policy.

The Contractor Performance System (CPS), developed by the National Institutes of Health, is designated as the single USDA-wide system for maintaining contractor performance/evaluation information. Use of the CPS is mandatory. As a minimum, the CPS shall be accessed for contractor past performance information as part of proposal evaluation in accordance with FAR subpart 15.3, and information resulting from the evaluation of contractor performance in accordance with FAR subpart 42.15 shall be entered into and maintained in this system. The CPS is a part of the USDA Acquisition Toolkit which can be accessed from the USDA Procurement Homepage at *http://www.usda.gov/procurement/.*

[66 FR 49867, Oct. 1, 2001]
#### 3003.101-3 Agency regulations.

The United States Office of Government Ethics has promulgated regulations applicable to the entire Executive Branch that address the conduct matters referenced in (FAR) 48 CFR 3.101-3. See 5 CFR vol. 3, ch. XVI, subch. B. The Department of Homeland Security has also issued a supplemental ethics regulation at 5 CFR part 4601 and Management Directive 0480.1, Ethics/Standards of Conduct.

[77 FR 50633, Aug. 22, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 17314, Apr. 2, 2021]
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

I, Steven V. Lant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central
      Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the "Companies") for the period ended
      September 30, 2005 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Companies.

Date: November 3, 2005

                                             /s/ Steven V. Lant
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                               Steven V. Lant
                                      Chairman of the Board, President and
                                Chief Executive Officer of CH Energy Group, Inc.

                                             /s/ Steven V. Lant
                               -------------------------------------------------
                                               Steven V. Lant
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
                                  of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CH Energy Group, Inc. and to Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation and will be retained by CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson Gas
& Electric Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,746
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               3,150
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    12,924
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         17,666
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           17,496
<LOANS>                                        125,222
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,370
<DEPOSITS>                                     154,507
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,982
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,169
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 171,370
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7,836
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,557
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               227
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               9,620
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,727
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5,893
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (5)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,751
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,751
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 8.07
<LOANS-NON>                                    631
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,217
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                380
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,311
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  170
<RECOVERIES>                                   11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,242
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,242
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        817



</TABLE>
# Title III, Part F, American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Program

# FY 2014 Discretionary Noncompeting Continuation Grantees

[11/18/2014]
3405.202 Exceptions. ( a ) ( 15 ) FSA—Issuance of a synopsis is not required when the firm to be solicited has previously provided a module for the system under a contract that contained cost, schedule, and performance goals and the contractor met those goals.
## Key Staff

**Shedita Alston-Senior Program OfficerU.S. Department of Education, OPENational Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Washington, DC 20202Telephone:  (202) 453-7090
Institutional Services
  Last Modified: 09/23/2021**
#### Lloyd Peterson, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 61813.)

— Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims, entered June 6, 1978, which granted a motion to dismiss the claim. The Superintendent of Banks took possession of the Municipal Credit Union of New York City under the provisions of section 606 of the Banking Law on November 2, 1977, finding one or more of the grounds specified in the statute present. The Superintendent in the exercise of the discretion vested in her pursuant to section 10, subdivision 3 of section 12 and section 606 of the Banking Law terminated the employment of claimant as general manager of the bank. Claimant filed a claim against the State for wrongful breach of contract of employment and demanded $335,000 in damages. The Court of Claims granted respondent’s motion to dismiss. The order should be affirmed. There is no dispute that the Superintendent was acting lawfully in taking possession of the credit union, a banking organization (Banking Law, § 2, subd 11). The issue raised is whether in doing so she may terminate the employment contract in question. Actions under section 606 clearly fall within the discretionary power of the Superintendent. In taking possession of a banking organization she acquired the powers of a statutory receiver *(Leal v Westchester Trust Co.,*279 NY 25; *Lafayette trust Co. v Beggs,*213 NY 280). Thus, the Superintendent had the power to reject the obligation created under the employment contract (49 NY Jur, Receivers, § 60). By virtue of section 606 of the Banking Law, the Superintendent has the duty *1055of instant decision and quick action to protect the moneys of the depositors *(Lunghino v Rand,*247 App Div 481, mot for lv to app den 272 NY 675). We, therefore, find that the Superintendent did not abuse the discretion vested in her by the banking laws in terminating the employment and salary of claimant (Banking Law, §§ 10, 12, subd 3; § 606). Section 41 of the Banking Law was properly ruled inapplicable by the Court of Claims since the Superintendent had taken possession of the organization pursuant to section 606 of the Banking Law. Moreover, the Superintendent here was exercising her statutory discretion in performance of a governmental function. Thus, the State is immune from liability for her action *(Weiss v Fote,*7 NY2d 579; *Burgundy Basin Inn v State of New York,*47 AD2d 692, mot for lv to app den 37 NY2d 706; *Gross v State of New York,*33 AD2d 868). Order afiirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Mikoll, J., not taking part.
#### 47.401 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Air freight forwarder* means an indirect air carrier that is responsible for the transportation of property from the point of receipt to the point of destination, and utilizes for the whole or any part of such transportation the services of a direct air carrier or its agent, or of another air freight forwarder.

*Gateway airport abroad* means the airport from which the traveler last embarks en route to the United States or at which the traveler first debarks incident to travel from the United States.

*Gateway airport in the United States* means the last U.S. airport from which the traveler's flight departs or the first U.S. airport at which the traveler's flight arrives.

*International air transportation* means transportation by air between a place in the United States and a place outside the United States or between two places both of which are outside the United States.

*United States* means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas of the United States.

*U.S.-flag air carrier* means an air carrier holding a certificate under section 401 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 41102).

[48 FR 42424, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2134, Jan. 10, 2001; 68 FR 28084, May 22, 2003]
246.406 Foreign governments. ( 1 ) *Quality assurance among North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries.* ( i ) NATO Standardization Agreement (STANAG) 4107, Mutual Acceptance of Government Quality Assurance and Usage of the Allied Quality Assurance Publications— ( A ) Contains the processes, procedures, terms, and conditions under which one NATO member nation will perform quality assurance for another NATO member nation or NATO organization;
( B ) Standardizes the development, updating, and application of the Allied Quality Assurance Publications; and
( C ) Has been ratified by the United States and other nations in NATO with certain reservations identified in STANAG 4107.
( ii ) Departments and agencies shall follow STANAG 4107 when— ( A ) Asking a NATO member nation to perform quality assurance; or
( B ) Performing quality assurance when requested by a NATO member nation or NATO organization.
( 2 ) *International military sales (non-NATO).* Departments and agencies shall— ( i ) Perform quality assurance services on international military sales contracts or in accordance with existing agreements;
( ii ) Inform host or U.S. Government personnel and contractors on the use of quality assurance publications; and
( iii ) Delegate quality assurance to the host government when satisfactory services are available.
( 3 ) *Reciprocal quality assurance agreements.* A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with a foreign country may contain an annex that provides for the reciprocal performance of quality assurance services. MOUs should be checked to determine whether such an annex exists for the country where a defense contract will be performed. (See subpart 225.8 for more information about MOUs.)
[56 FR 36460, July 31, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 43890, Aug. 17, 1998; 63 FR 47439, Sept. 8, 1998; 71 FR 27647, May 12, 2006]