alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Re: Propiconazole; Immunotox and and acute and subchronic neurotoxicity data requirements Thurston Morton to: Andrew Ertman 05/17/2012 02:22 PM Cc: Barbara Madden, Elissa Reaves, Abdallah Khasawinah, Susan Hummel Andy, At the moment the subchronic neurotoxicity and immunotoxicity are datagaps. However, we are planning on taking propiconazole to the Hazard and Science Policy Council (HASPOC) in June for the sugarcane petition. The HASPOC will make a formal determination of the need for these outstanding toxicity studies. Thanks Thurston Andrew Ertman 05/17/2012 09:08:47 AM Thurston, Could you provide some clarification a...
From: Andrew Ertman/DC/USEPA/US To: Thurston Morton/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Barbara Madden/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/17/2012 09:08 AM Subject: Propiconazole; Immunotox and and acute and subchronic neurotoxicity data requirements Thurston, Could you provide some clarification as to whether the immunotoxicity and acute and subchronic neurotoxicity requirements are data gaps for propiconazole? Thanks, Andy

Andrew Ertman Minor Use Team Risk Integration, Minor Use, and Emergency Response Branch Registration Division Office of Pesticide Programs U.S. EPA (703)308-9367
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

October 4, 2012

No. 11-2605

MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED,

 Appellant

v.

CHERYL SCHWARZWAELDER

(W.D. Pa. Nos. 2-11-cv-00107 and No. 2-11-cv-00162)

Present: SLOVITER and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

1. Appellee’s Petition for Reconstitution of Panel or, Alternatively, for Rehearing

by the Panel.

2. Appellant’s Answer to the Petition for Rehearing

Respectfully,

Clerk

_________________________________ORDER_______________________________

The foregoing petition for panel rehearing and reconstitution of the panel is granted. Oral 

argument will be scheduled at the convenience of the panel.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas I. Vanaskie

Circuit Judge

Dated: October 16, 2012

Tnh/cc: Joseph H. Chivers, III, Esq.

Patricia A. Tsipras, Esq.

Lauren D. Rushak, Esq.

Michael J. Fortunato, Esq.
# C_2021244EN.01002101.xml

| 22.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/21

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 June 2021

(2021/C 244/10)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1891 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4364 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2163 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0954 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 147,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2673 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,569 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 354,11 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5329 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9237 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,4483 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5821 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4758 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2326 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7057 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5989 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 349,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9453 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6916 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4995 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 175,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9318 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,973 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,1265 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,593 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0192 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,4932 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,1860 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1891

JPY

Japanese yen

130,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4364

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85670

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2163

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0954

ISK

Iceland króna

147,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2673

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,569

HUF

Hungarian forint

354,11

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5329

RON

Romanian leu

4,9237

TRY

Turkish lira

10,4483

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5821

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4758

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2326

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7057

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5989

KRW

South Korean won

1 349,19

ZAR

South African rand

16,9453

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6916

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4995

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 175,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9318

PHP

Philippine peso

57,973

RUB

Russian rouble

87,1265

THB

Thai baht

37,593

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0192

MXN

Mexican peso

24,4932

INR

Indian rupee

88,1860

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL F. STANKUS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-723

April 3, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas W. Krug, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Jeri Delgado, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### MEYEROWITZ v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Street Railroads—Passengers—Injuries—Negligence—Sufficiency.

Evidence that while plaintiff was attempting to board a street car, which had stopped in response to his signal, the car started, and plaintiff fell on the street, without showing in what manner the car started, and without showing that plaintiff’s fall was caused by the starting of the car, was insufficient to show negligence on the part of defendant.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Action by Abraham Meyerowitz against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J„ and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Morris Cukor, for respondent.

Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.

FREEDMAN, P. J.

This is one of the ordinary actions for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The only evidence given by the plaintiff, who was the only witness sworn in his behalf, as to the occurrence, was that one of the defendant’s cars stopped in response to his signal, and that plaintiff “stepped with the right foot on the car, and then I was holding. .1 wanted to get on, and the car started, and I fell off;1 and the car went right along, and I fell on the street.” This is no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant. The mere starting of a car is not negligence. How or in what manner the car in this case was started does not appear, nor was it shown that the plaintiff’s fall was caused by such starting of the car.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Title III, Part A, Section 318 of the HEA, as amended  

## Regulations

                - Currently, there are no program-specific regulations.
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98 and 99.

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           2023/2024 Prevention Resource Guide      

# 2023/2024 Prevention Resource Guide

This guide (PDF, 85 pages) highlights the innovative ways that communities around the country are doing purposeful prevention work to help children and families thrive. This guide highlights the theme, "Doing Things Differently: Moving from the Challenge to the Change.” The guide also contains Protective Factors Conversation Guides to help service providers engage caregivers in personalized conversations about the protective factors.**Learn more**(PDF, 85 pages).
**Exhibit 10.c.**

 

Summary of Key Terms of 2005 Executive Cash Bonus Program

 

On February 15, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of theCompensation Committee, approved the Company’s 2005 cash bonus program covering the Company’s senior management team, including the following executive officers of CDI Corp.: Roger Ballou (President and CEO), Jay Stuart (Executive VicePresident and CFO), Joseph Seiders (Senior Vice President and General Counsel), and Cecilia Venglarik (Senior Vice President, Human Resources). 

 

The 2005 target bonuses established for those executive officers are $416,250 for Roger Ballou, $155,000 for Jay Stuart, $85,200 for Joseph Seiders and $99,000 forCecilia Venglarik. Under the severance agreement signed by the Company and Jay Stuart, who is scheduled to leave CDI in May 2005, Mr. Stuart would receive a pro rata portion of any 2005 bonus earned. 

 

Under the 2005 cash bonus program, a bonus pool will be created for the Company’s seniormanagement team based on CDI’s achievement of certain levels of return on invested capital during 2005. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to increase the amount of the bonus pool by up to 20% to reflect key accomplishments thatpositively affect long-term shareholder value. 

 

Payouts to the executiveofficers from any amounts in the bonus pool will be based on the Company’s achievement of certain established financial goals in 2005. The financial goals relate to three measures: direct margin dollars, net income and return on assets. Thethree goals are given the following weights: the direct margin dollars goal represents 25% of the total bonus opportunity, the net income goal represents 45%, and the return on assets goal represents 30%. The maximum payout related to the net incomeand return on assets goals is 200% of the target level. The payout related to the direct margin goal is capped at 150% of the target.
30.601 Responsibility. ( a ) The CFAO shall perform CAS administration for all contracts and subcontracts in a business unit, even when the contracting officer retains other administration functions. The CFAO shall make all CAS-related required determinations and findings (*see* Subpart 1.7) for all CAS-covered contracts and subcontracts, including— ( 1 ) Whether a change in cost accounting practice or noncompliance has occurred; and
( 2 ) If a change in cost accounting practice or noncompliance has occurred, how any resulting cost impacts are resolved.
( b ) Within 30 days after the award of any new contract subject to CAS, the contracting officer making the award shall request the CFAO to perform administration for CAS matters (see Subpart 42.2). For subcontract awards, the contractor awarding the subcontract must follow the procedures at 52.230-6(l), (m), and (n).
( c ) In performing CAS administration, the CFAO shall request and consider the advice of the auditor as appropriate (see 1.602-2).
[70 FR 11753, Mar. 9, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 10967, Feb. 28, 2008]
----

----

| CLECO      CORPORATION |  EXHIBIT 32.2 |
|------------------------|--------------------|

|   Cleco      Corporation                |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO                    |
| 18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      |
| AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       |
| SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |

| (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Date:  May      6, 2009                                         |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  R.      Russell Davis                                                     |
| R.      Russell DavisVice      President, Chief Accounting Officer&      Interim CFO |

----

----
Exhibit 10(y)
Executive officer compensation arrangements
On February 21, 2005 the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors ofCompass Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) approvedcompensation arrangements of the Company’schief executive officer and certain other executive officers expected to be named in theCompany’s proxy statement for its 2006 annual meeting of shareholders as its four highest paidexecutive officers: D. PaulJones, Jr., $975,000; Garrett R. Hegel, $450,000; James D. Barri, $410,000;Clayton D. Pledger, $345,000; G. Ray Stone, $345,000. The changes to base salaries were consistentwith the description of how base salaries are set in the Committee’s report in the Company’s 2005Proxy Statement dated March 18, 2005.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02321]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 22 / Thursday, February 4, 2021 / 
Notices

[[Page 8160]]



AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION


Public Quarterly Meeting of the Board of Directors

AGENCY: United States African Development Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The US African Development Foundation (USADF) will hold its 
quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors to discuss the agency's 
programs and administration. This meeting will occur at the USADF 
office.

DATES: The meeting date is Tuesday, February 9, 2021, 10 a.m. to 11:30 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held by teleconference. Please contact 
the Agency Contact listed below for conference details.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nina-Belle Mbayu, (202) 233-8808, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cea0aca3acafb7bb8ebbbdafaaa8e0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4dad6d9d6d5cdc1f4c1c7d5d0d29ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: Public Law 96-533 (22 U.S.C. 290h))

    Dated: February 1, 2021.
Nina-Belle Mbayu,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2021-02321 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6117-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-88,720-01 & WR-88,720-02

EX PARTE JASON EARL WHITE, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W10077-1 & W8888-1 IN THE 335 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM HOOD COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code ofCriminalProcedure, the clerk of

the trialcourt transmitted to thisCourt these applicationsforwrits ofhabeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418

S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). In Cause No. CR10077, Applicant was convicted of three

counts of aggravated sexual assault, one count of indecency with a child by contact, and three counts of

indecency with a child by exposure and sentenced to sixty-five years’ imprisonment, twenty years’

imprisonment, and eight years’ imprisonment, respectively. InCause No. 8888, Applicant was convicted

ofaggravated sexualassault ofa child and sentenced to fortyyears’imprisonment. Applicant’sconvictions
2

were affirmed bythe Second Court ofAppeals. White v. State, Nos. 02-07-00089-CR& 02-07-00090-

CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 29, 2008) (not designated for publication). 

The Court remanded these writ applications for responses and findings addressing one of

Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims and for a finding concerning the status of a pending

motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. After the habeas court signed findings of fact on remand, this Court

denied and dismissed with a written order on January 30, 2019. We now withdraw our order ofJanuary

30, 2019, and reconsider the case on our own motion. TEX. R. APP. P. 79.2(d). 

After an independent review of the entire record and the trial court’s findings, we find that

Applicant's claims challenging the validity of his convictions and sentences are without merit. Therefore,

we deny relief.

Applicant’s claim for pre-sentence jail time credit is dismissed. Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d

695 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). 

Filed: July 3, 2019

Do not publish
# C_2020264EN.01000201.xml

| 12.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 August 2020

(2020/C 264/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1783 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4469 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89843 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2835 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0743 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 161,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5658 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,155 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 345,03 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4018 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8355 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,5410 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6406 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5656 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1320 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7833 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6154 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 393,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,6263 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1857 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4795 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 348,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9400 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,615 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,6858 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,598 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4068 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 26,3028 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,8620 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1783

JPY

Japanese yen

124,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4469

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89843

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2835

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0743

ISK

Iceland króna

161,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5658

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,155

HUF

Hungarian forint

345,03

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4018

RON

Romanian leu

4,8355

TRY

Turkish lira

8,5410

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6406

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5656

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1320

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7833

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6154

KRW

South Korean won

1 393,79

ZAR

South African rand

20,6263

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1857

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4795

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 348,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9400

PHP

Philippine peso

57,615

RUB

Russian rouble

85,6858

THB

Thai baht

36,598

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4068

MXN

Mexican peso

26,3028

INR

Indian rupee

87,8620

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 2852.200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart sets forth the text of all DOJ provisions and clauses. It also cross-references to the location in the JAR that prescribes the use of each provision and clause.