alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between J. F. Braun & Sons, Inc., Respondent, and Ruben Melo, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 1, 1977, granting petitioner’s motion to confirm two arbitration awards and denying appellant’s cross motion to vacate the awards is unanimously dismissed, without costs. J. F. Braun & Sons, Inc., agreed to purchase quantities of Brazil nuts from appellant Ruben Melo pursuant to two contracts purportedly executed on behalf of appellant by the B. Sessler Co., Inc. The contracts contained provisions for arbitration in accordance with the rules of the Association of Food Distributors. When the nuts were not delivered, petitioner demanded arbitration. Arbitration awards were made in favor of petitioner and upon motion were confirmed by the judgment herein appealed. A later motion by appellant "to renew and reargue” the cross motion to vacate the arbitration awards was partially granted in Special Term, the court saying: "Motion is granted to the extent that further proceedings upon the arbitration award are stayed pending a hearing to determine whether or not the agent Sessler exceeded his authority in executing the arbitration agreement in the name of the individual, and whether, if he did, his acts were ratified by the individual. That some information, necessary to the resolution of this question, was withheld by petitioner is shown by the moving affidavit. These issues are referred to Trial Term, Part II, for assignment to hear and report. Pending receipt of the report, final determination is held in abeyance.” It now appears that although the hearings were begun they have not been completed because of the unavailability of a necessary witness; thus, final determination is still pending. This court cannot review the order disposing of appellant’s motion to "renew and reargue” because no appeal was taken from it. In the absence of such a separate appeal that order is not reviewable upon this appeal since that order did not make "substantially the same determination” as was made in the judgment entered November 1, 1977. (See CPLR 5517, subd [a], par 1; subd [b].) We refer to the subsequent order only as it bears on the continued viability of the appeal from the judgment. Since all proceedings to enforce the arbitration award have been stayed pending a hearing on the obvious factual issues concerning Sessler’s authority, the judgment now being appealed is dormant and will not revive until a new order is entered after the hearing but only if that order rejects appellant’s factual assertions and adheres to the original confirmation of the awards. When an order is entered after the hearing a new appeal will be available to any party aggrieved thereby. A disposition by this court on the merits at this juncture would be premature and advisory. Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Sandler and Lupiano, JJ.
#### 423.402 [Reserved]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Brightly-Colored Fentanyl Used to Target Young Americans      

# Brightly-Colored Fentanyl Used to Target Young Americans

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) recently alerted the public to an alarming trend of colorful fentanyl across the country. This “rainbow fentanyl” is a new method used by drug cartels to sell fentanyl made to look like candy to children and young people. The brightly colored drug is being sold in pill, powder, and block form resembling sidewalk chalk. The DEA has deemed the phenomenon a deliberate effort by drug traffickers to drive addiction amongst kids and young adults. **Learn more.**
#### 3015.204-3 Contract clauses.

The contracting officer shall insert clause (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.215-70, Key Personnel or Facilities, in solicitations and contracts when the selection for award is substantially based on the offeror's possession of special capabilities regarding personnel or facilities.
----

----

EXHIBIT 99(d)

        Items incorporated by  reference from the Registrants' Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the  year ended December 31, 2002: "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial  Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies - Cleco  Power."

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

*Cleco Power*
          Generally, Cleco Power is affected more by the decisions of the LPSC than by market conditions.  The LPSC has authority over several critical areas of Cleco Power.  The most important are listed below.
-  

The LPSC determines the ability of Cleco Power to recover prudent costs incurred in developing long-lived assets.  If the LPSC were to rule that the cost of current or future long-lived assets was imprudent and not recoverable, Cleco Power could be required to write down the imprudent cost and incur a corresponding impairment loss.  At December 31, 2002, the carrying value of Cleco Power's long-lived assets was $1.0 billion.  Currently, Cleco Power has concluded that none of its long-lived assets are impaired.-  

The LPSC determines the ability of Cleco Power to recover regulatory assets that are recorded according to SFAS No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation."  Cleco Power has concluded it is probable that regulatory assets can be recovered from ratepayers in future rates.  At December 31, 2002, Cleco Power has $91.2 million in regulatory assets, net of regulatory liabilities.  Actions by the LPSC could limit the recovery of these regulatory assets, causing Cleco Power to record a loss on some or all of the regulatory assets.  For additional information on the LPSC and regulatory assets, see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2 - "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Regulation."-  

The LPSC determines the amount and type of fuel and purchased power costs that Cleco Power can charge customers through the fuel adjustment clause.  Changes in the determination of allowable costs already incurred by Cleco Power could cause material changes in fuel revenue.  For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, Cleco Power reported fuel revenue of $262.7 million, $304.3 million, and $296.8 million, respectively.  For additional information on the LPSC and the fuel adjustment clause, see "- Financial Condition - Retail Rates of Cleco Power" and "- Results of Operations - General Factors Affecting Cleco Power - Fuel and power purchased are primarily affected by the following factors."-  

Cleco Power has recorded a liability of $3.3 million for estimated customer credits it expects to refund to its retail ratepayers pursuant to a settlement agreement with the LPSC limiting Cleco Power's return on equity.  The LPSC has the right to audit the filing under the settlement and has done so in the past.  If the LPSC's findings concerning estimated customer refunds are different from those expected, Cleco Power could be required to adjust the liability.  For additional information on estimated customer credits, see "- Financial Condition - Retail Rates of Cleco Power."**33**
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the
Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William R. McManaman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                            |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                           
|/s/ William R. McManaman                                   
|William R. McManaman Chief Executive Officer March 16, 2009

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board ofDirectors 

AMCORE Financial, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-10446, 333-75261, and 333-118911) on Form S-8 of AMCORE Financial, Inc. of our reports dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of AMCORE Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois 

March 10, 2006
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Amend Section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					 and 	Eighty-Eighth Congress, 1963-1965. 						*Amend Section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Eighty-Eighth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 11499, June 11, 1964*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										June 11, 1964,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/374,			accessed on September 9, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### 52.204-27 Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application.

As prescribed in 4.2203, insert the following clause:

# Prohibition on a Bytedance Covered Application (JUN 2023)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Covered application* means the social networking service TikTok or any successor application or service developed or provided by ByteDance Limited or an entity owned by ByteDance Limited.

*Information technology,* as defined in 40 U.S.C. 11101(6)—

(1) Means any equipment or interconnected system or subsystem of equipment, used in the automatic acquisition, storage, analysis, evaluation, manipulation, management, movement, control, display, switching, interchange, transmission, or reception of data or information by the executive agency, if the equipment is used by the executive agency directly or is used by a contractor under a contract with the executive agency that requires the use—

(i) Of that equipment; or

(ii) Of that equipment to a significant extent in the performance of a service or the furnishing of a product;

(2) Includes computers, ancillary equipment (including imaging peripherals, input, output, and storage devices necessary for security and surveillance), peripheral equipment designed to be controlled by the central processing unit of a computer, software, firmware and similar procedures, services (including support services), and related resources; but

(3) Does not include any equipment acquired by a Federal contractor incidental to a Federal contract.

(b) *Prohibition.* Section 102 of Division R of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (Pub. L. 117-328), the No TikTok on Government Devices Act, and its implementing guidance under Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-23-13, dated February 27, 2023, “No TikTok on Government Devices” Implementation Guidance, collectively prohibit the presence or use of a covered application on executive agency information technology, including certain equipment used by Federal contractors. The Contractor is prohibited from having or using a covered application on any information technology owned or managed by the Government, or on any information technology used or provided by the Contractor under this contract, including equipment provided by the Contractor's employees; however, this prohibition does not apply if the Contracting Officer provides written notification to the Contractor that an exception has been granted in accordance with OMB Memorandum M-23-13.

(c) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts, including subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services.

(End of clause)

[88 FR 36434, June 2, 2023]
#### 352.270-1--352.270-3 [Reserved]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Educator Diversity Matters: Strategies for Charter Leaders to Recruit, Hire, and Sustain Teachers of Color      

# Resource: Educator Diversity Matters: Strategies for Charter Leaders to Recruit, Hire, and Sustain Teachers of Color

This report (PDF, 24 pages) is designed to support charter school leaders’ efforts to achieve educational equity by focusing on one key strategy — building a pipeline of teachers of color through effective recruiting, hiring, and sustaining strategies. **Learn more.**
# C_2020136EN.01000201.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/2

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2020/C 136/02)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Latvia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Latvia

Subject of commemoration: Latgalian ceramics

Description of the design: The coin is dedicated to the Latgalian pottery. The traditional pottery established itself for substantial periods of time in two districts, Latgale and Kurzeme, ut only in Latgale it has survived throughout the times and passed over to the next generations. The Latgalian pottery is included also in the Latvian Culture Canon.

The design depicts a characteristic piece of Latgalian ceramics – clay candelabrum. It bears an inscription ‘LATGALES KERAMIKA’ (Latgalian ceramics), the country name ‘LATVIJA’ as well as the year of issuance ‘2020’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 312 000

Date of issue: Second quarter of 2020

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, pp. 52).

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- KHS Corporation Under Contract No. SPE4A6-15-D-5845 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No
. 62032

Mr. William Schwemlein

Vice-President Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

Ch~efTrial Attorney Edward R. Murray, Esq. Ashley M. Kelly, Esq
.

Trial Attorneys DLA Aviation Richmond, VA OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL

ON THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The government moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, saying that in this appeal from a supposed termination ofthe contract for default there has been no termination. For us to havejurisdiction there has to be a claim; in an appeal from a contract termination, the claim (which in a termination case is the claim ofthe government) is the termination itself. 

### See Malone v. United States, 849 F.2d 1441 , 1443 (Fed. Cir. 1988). Appellant requests that we delay the hearing ofthe appeal 

### until the government determines whether to terminate the contract (app. Aug. 16, 2019 , filing at 3)
. We take that as a concession that the above-captioned contract has 

### not been terminated and accordingly grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Dated: November 20, 2019

(Signatures continued) Adm1mstranve Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

### I concur

# AnRICHARf)SHACKLEFORD AdminisYrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

0 

### Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62032, Appeal ofKHS Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals