alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. J. Res. 26 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-three 

Joint Resolution 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Revised 

Criminal Code Act of 2022. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves of the action of the District of Columbia Council 

described as follows: The Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (D.C. 

Act 24–789), enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia 

on January 17, 2023, and transmitted to Congress pursuant to 

section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act on 

January 27, 2023. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### 47.304 Determination of delivery terms.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Home |
|                                                   |

A State may transfer up to 50 percent of the non-administrative funds allotted to it to carry out State-level activities under certain provisions identified in the statute.

An LEA (except an LEA identified for improvement under 1116(c)  or subject to corrective action under section 1116(c)(9)) may transfer up to 50 percent of the funds allocated to it *by formula*under certain provisions identified in the statute.

An LEA identified for improvement under section 1116(c) may transfer not more than 30 percent of the funds allocated to it by formula under the provisions identified in the statute to its allocation for school improvement under section 1003 or to any other allocation listed in the statute if the transferred funds are used only for LEA improvement activities consistent with section 1116(c).  The LEA may not transfer funds allocated under Part A of Title I to any other program.

An LEA identified for corrective action is prohibited from transferring funds under the transferability authority.

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable viewShare this page |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
514.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award. Delegation of authority by head of the agency. Under FAR 14.407-3(e), contracting directors (see 502.101) are authorized, without power of redelegation, to make: ( a ) The determinations regarding corrections and withdrawals under FAR 14.407-3(a), (b), and (c); and
( b ) The corollary determinations not to permit withdrawal or correction under FAR 14.407-3(d).
[74 FR 47740, Sept. 17, 2009]
# C_2019072EN.01000101.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 72/01)

Last publication

OJ C 65, 18.2.2019

Past publications

OJ C 54, 11.2.2019

OJ C 44, 4.2.2019

OJ C 35, 28.1.2019

OJ C 25, 21.1.2019

OJ C 16, 14.1.2019

OJ C 4, 7.1.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PEACE CORPS


Information Collection Request Submission for OMB Review; 
Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Peace Corps.

ACTION: Notice; reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Peace Corps published a document in the Federal Register 
of December 7, 2020, concerning request for comments on an information 
collection request submission for OMB Review. The purpose of this 
notice is to reopen the document comment period.

DATES: The comment period for the notice published December 7, 2020, at 
85 FR 78885, is reopened. Submit comments on or before March 18, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Address written comments and recommendations for the 
proposed information collection to Virginia Burke, FOIA/Privacy Act 
Officer, by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b5b484d596b5b4e4a484e4844595b58054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a1a090c182a1a0f0b090f0905181a19440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>. Email comments must be made 
in text and not in attachments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virginia Burke, 202-692-1887.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2020-26863, published at 85 FR 
78885 on December 7, 2020, the notice gave a 30-day comment period that 
closed on January 6, 2021, but the comment period should have been 60 
days. The Peace Corps is reopening the comment period to provide an 
additional 30 days of comments.

    This notice is issued in Washington, DC, on February 10, 2021.
Virginia Burke,
FOIA/Privacy Act Officer, Management.
[FR Doc. 2021-03071 Filed 2-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6051-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2021030EN.01000301.xml

| 27.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 January 2021

(2021/C 30/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2143 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4390 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88698 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0715 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0789 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 157,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3873 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,080 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 358,61 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5465 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8748 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,9269 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5709 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5444 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4132 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6793 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6099 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 339,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,4065 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8537 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5630 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 126,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9161 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,379 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 91,2538 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,405 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,5816 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,3386 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,5555 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2143

JPY

Japanese yen

125,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4390

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88698

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0715

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0789

ISK

Iceland króna

157,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3873

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,080

HUF

Hungarian forint

358,61

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5465

RON

Romanian leu

4,8748

TRY

Turkish lira

8,9269

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5709

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5444

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4132

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6793

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6099

KRW

South Korean won

1 339,51

ZAR

South African rand

18,4065

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8537

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5630

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 126,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9161

PHP

Philippine peso

58,379

RUB

Russian rouble

91,2538

THB

Thai baht

36,405

BRL

Brazilian real

6,5816

MXN

Mexican peso

24,3386

INR

Indian rupee

88,5555

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Supporting Families with Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders      

# Resource: Supporting Families with Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

This webpage provides information about mental health and substance use disorders affecting parents and youth as well as assessment tools and treatment programs.  
                  -  Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders 
                  -  Working with families: Mental health 
                  -  Working with families: Substance use 

**Learn more.**
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

ARTURO GONZALEZ,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-12-00311-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120C07213)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

order suppressing the breath test. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and 

remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J. (Not Participating)
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF
                     SERIES F CONVERTIBLE PREFERREDSTOCK OF
                                  EQUITEX, INC.


     EQUITEX, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue if
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "GCL"), originally
incorporated by the Certificate of Incorporation dated January 19, 1983, and as
amended from time to time, does hereby certify that pursuant to Section 141(f)
of the GCL, the Board of Directors of the Corporation, adopted a resolution
pursuant to the authority of the Board as required by Section 151 of the GCL,
setting forth a proposed amendment to the Certificate of Designation of Series F
Preferred Stock of said corporation filed on July 14, 2000, and declared the
amendment to be advisable. The proposed amendment is as follows:

     1. Paragraph 1 of said Certificate of Designation shall be amended so that,
as amended, said Paragraph 1 shall be and read as follows:

     2. DESIGNATION AND AMOUNT. The distinctive designation of this series,
which consists of FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY THOUSAND (460,000) shares of Preferred
Stock, shall be Series F Convertible Preferred Stock (the "SERIES F PREFERRED
STOCK") and the stated value shall be EIGHT DOLLARS ($8.00) per share (the
"STATED VALUE"). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate
to be signed by Henry Fong, its authorized officer, this 25th day of August,
2000.

                                         EQUITEX, INC
                                         By:/s/ Henry Fong
                                            --------------------------------
                                         Henry Fong
#### CROWELL, Respondent, v. ORANGE COUNTY TRACTION CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by John. F. Crowell against the Orange County Traction Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-1995
<CASH>                                         1098699
<SECURITIES>                                   8445450
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9624533   
<PP&E>                                         2038041
<DEPRECIATION>                                  614119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11675070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           976046
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        376688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    10269535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11675070
<SALES>                                         597760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1354754
<CGS>                                           243586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   971884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 904930
<INCOME-TAX>                                    333412
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             571518
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    571518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 515 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 124 

[Report No. 118–617] 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller 

of the Currency relating to ‘‘Principles for Climate-Related Financial 

Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2024 

Mr. DONALDS (for himself, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. PERRY, Mr. OGLES, Mr. WEBER

of Texas, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. MEUSER, and Mr. HUIZENGA) submitted the 

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

JULY 30, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Mr. STEIL, Mrs. HOUCHIN, Mr. HILL, and Mr. BARR

JULY 30, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating 

to ‘‘Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 124 RH 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Of4 fice of the Comptroller of the Currency relating to ‘‘Prin5 ciples for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for 

6 Large Financial Institutions’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 74183; pub7 lished October 30, 2023), and such rule shall have no force 

8 or effect. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 515 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 124 

[Report No. 118–617] 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapnancial Institutions’’. lated Financial Risk Management for Large Fi- Currency relating to ‘‘Principles for Climate-Re- submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

JULY 30, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### R. Gillies, Appellee, v. E. B. Marshall, Appellant. Brady’s Stamp Shop, Inc., Appellant.

Gen. Nos. 41,317, 41,334.

opinion filed February 17, 1941.

Seymour S. Cunningham, for appellants; Randolph Bohrer, for appellee; Milton J. Fink, of counsel.

Opinion by

Justice Matchett.

“Hot to be published in full.”
# C_2018255EN.01000801.xml

| 20.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 July 2018

(2018/C 255/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1588 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4537 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89298 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3565 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1622 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 124,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5763 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,920 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 325,77 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3280 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6575 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,5957 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5804 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5351 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0963 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7229 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5909 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 320,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,6003 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8553 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3938 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 773,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7231 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,180 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,5585 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,797 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4874 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1067 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,0155 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1588

JPY

Japanese yen

130,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4537

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89298

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3565

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1622

ISK

Iceland króna

124,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5763

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,920

HUF

Hungarian forint

325,77

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3280

RON

Romanian leu

4,6575

TRY

Turkish lira

5,5957

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5804

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5351

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0963

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7229

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5909

KRW

South Korean won

1 320,68

ZAR

South African rand

15,6003

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8553

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3938

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 773,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7231

PHP

Philippine peso

62,180

RUB

Russian rouble

73,5585

THB

Thai baht

38,797

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4874

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1067

INR

Indian rupee

80,0155

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Johnson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 23, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of assault in the second degree, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Judgment reversed on the law and new trial granted. The findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict are affirmed. In our opinion, it was substantial, prejudicial error for the trial court to charge) on the issue of self-defense, that defendant had a duty to retreat “ to the wall ”, if possible, before defending himself. The rule imposing that duty of retreat applies to homicide cases, but not to assault cases *(People*v. *Lopez,*238 App. Div. 619; *People*v. *Katz,*263 App. Div. 883; *People*v. *Martens,*272 App. Div. 1022). The absence of an exception to the erroneous portion of the charge does not preclude us from reversing and granting a new trial in the interests of justice (Code Grim. Pro., § 527). On this record, we believe such relief is justified, not only because of the substantial issue with respect to self-defense, but also because of the several inflammatory and prejudicial remarks made by the prosecutor during summation. Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Beldóck, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum: On July 21, 1962, defendant shot one Patterson in the head with a rifle bullet, as the result of which Patterson died. At the end of the People’s ease, the trial court dismissed a count of manslaughter in the first degree. Defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree. In my opinion, the alleged error in the charge as to self-defense is entirely immaterial ; that portion of the charge was inapplicable to the facts of this ease. There is no testimony that Patterson ever aimed or shot at the defendant; the only testimony is that Patterson shot at one named Weaver. Under such circumstances, defendant could not have been defending himself against Patterson. However, even if there were error in the charge, no exception thereto was taken. In the absence of such exception, the interests of justice do not require reversal where, as here, the proof of defendant’s guilt is overwhelming. The interests of justice operated sufficiently in defendant’s favor when the manslaughter count was dismissed, and, in my opinion erroneously dismissed.