alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.a
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Roger H. Ballou, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CDI Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2004      By:  /s/Roger H. Ballou  Roger H. Ballou   President and Chief Executive Officer
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT FEB RUARY 23, 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 12787 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 05 -007 70 -C V -T W T -1 M I C H A E L B E RN A R D W R I G H T , P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s C H A I R M A N M I L T O N E . N I X , J R ., G e o r g iaS ta te B o a r d o f

P ar d o n s a n d P a r o le s , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( F e b r u ar y 23, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , A N D E R S O N an d B IR C H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: I n thi s c a s e , the di s tr i c tc ourtdi s m i s s e d the pl a i nt i f f’ s c om pl a i ntunde r282

U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 A f

o rf a ilu r e to s ta te ac la im f

o rr e lie f u n d e r4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 . P l a i nt i f f i s aG e or gi apr i s on i nm a t e . H i s c om pl a i ntc onc e rns hi s e l i gi bi l i ty f or p a r o le a n d th e B o a r d ’s r e f u s a l to r e le a s e h im o n p a r o le . H e s e e k s $ 6 5 0 ,0 0 0 in co m p en sat o ry an d p u n i t i v e d am ag es. In i t s di sposi t i ve order of M ay5, 20 05 , re cord vo l . 1 att ab 3, the di stri ct c ourta na l y z e d the pl a i nt i f f’ s c l a i m a nd f

ound i tm e r i t l e s s a s am a tt e rof l a w . T he pl a i nt i f f now appe a l s , c ha l l e ngi ng the c ourt ’ s de c i s i on. W e f i nd no e rr ori n the c o u rt’s a n a ly s is o f

h is c la im o rin its ap p lic a tio n o f th e la w th e r e to . AF F I RME D.
## Program Authority

20 U.S.C. 1411(c), 1416(i), and 1418(c) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

----

## Applicable Regulations

      -  The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
      - The Education Department debarment and suspension regulations in 2 CFR part 3485. 
      - The regulations in 34 CFR part 300.702.
      - The notice of final priorities for this program as published in the *Federal Register*.
#### 3001.704 Content.

The following format shall be used for all determinations and findings (D&Fs), unless otherwise specified in the FAR or the HSAR. The contracting officer is responsible for preparing D&Fs, and requirements and technical personnel are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the supporting factual information, which shall be furnished to the contracting officer.

Insert specific information indicated in brackets.

## Determination and Findings

Under [*insert citation for appropriate statutory and/or regulatory basis for D&F*], the Department of Homeland Security, [*insert contracting activity*], is granted authority to [*insert nature and/or description of the action being approved*].

## Findings

[*Findings that detail the particular circumstances, facts, or reasoning essential to support the determination.*]

## Determination

[*A determination, based on the findings, that the proposed action is justified under the applicable statute or regulation.*] [*Expiration date of the D&F, if required.*]

[*Signature of authorized official*]

Name and Title

[month, day, and year]

Date
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Shakim Allah, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 5, 1978, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented before the Grand Jury was not legally sufficient to establish the crimes charged. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied and indictment reinstated. The evidence before the Grand Jury was sufficient to sustain the indictment (see *People v Wright,*68 AD2d 930). Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION INCLUDED IN
THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      279,409
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,537
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          40,957
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         9,541
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 331,444
<COMMON>                                        11,045
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       97,380
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              6,983
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 115,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,186
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           110,650
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              23,713
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                75,487
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                       0
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  331,444
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       62,917
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,062
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      49,479
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      49,479
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         13,438
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  13,438
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,622
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,754
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        123
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    6,631
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,650
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           (140)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer of YDI Wireless, Inc.,
certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of YDI Wireless, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: March 31, 2005                        /s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                            ------------------------
                                            Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                            Chief Executive Officer
#### BYRNES v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Negligence—Sufficiency of Evidence.

Mere proof of defendant’s negligence, without any evidence showing freedom from contributory negligence, will not sustain a recovery.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District.

Action by William L. Byrnes against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J„ and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.

Cornelius J. Early, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff’s driver, in of a two-horse truck, was crossing Lexington avenue from the east to the west at 128th street, when a collision occurred between the car and the truck or the horses attached thereto, and this action is to recover damages *194therefor. The truck was in charge of the plaintiff’s driver, who was the only person on the truck at the time. Several witnesses were produced on the part of the plaintiff, who saw the occurrence, but the driver was not sworn, and the only excuse given was that he had been subpoenaed and had failed to appear, and the plaintiff proceeded to trial without his testimony. Although it may be said that from the testimony of plaintiff’s witnesses the court might be justified in finding that the defendant was guilty of negligence, there is no evidence in the case whatever to show whether or not the driver took any precautions to avoid the accident, or was free from contributory negligence himself. This requires a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
#### Daniel Orlikowski, Appellant, v. Alfred Strash, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed, with $25 costs and disbursements and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The issue presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff as a result of his employment as a factory worker in the City of Buffalo meets the jurisdictional requirement of subdivision 2 of section 21-a of the Buffalo City Court Act which extends the territorial jurisdiction of the City Court to actions in which one of the parties, although not a resident of the City of Buffalo, has “ an office for the regular transaction of business within the City of Buffalo ”, In affirming the City Court order setting aside the service of summons on the ground that the plaintiff had no office in the City of Buffalo within the meaning of the quoted section, Special Term gave a restricted interpretation to the word “ office ” which excluded persons employed in a place not generally recognized as an *“*office ”. The test of jurisdiction should not be so narrowly construed. If a person has full-time employment within the City of Buffalo, as does the plaintiff, he meets the requirements of the Act whether that employment is physically carried on in the office portion of the building or in the factory area. An *“*office ” is a room or any other part of a building in which a person carries on his usual occupation regardless of the type of service rendered. It is his presence in the regular course of his employment within the City of Buffalo which the City Court Act intends and not the nature of his work. The place where the plaintiff spends his working hours is the City of Buffalo and it is this fact which meets the jurisdictional precepts of the act. One may carry on a business even though he be not the proprietor or an executive and to limit the word “ office ” as was done here is unreasonable *(Lewis*v. *Davis,*8 Daly 185; also, see *Coward*v. *Moore,*3 Misc 2d 666; *Brassack*v. *Interborough R. T. Co.,*66 Misc. 190-191; *Bote*v. *City Bank Farmers Trust Co.,*61 N. Y. S. 2d 280). (Appeal from order of Eric Special Term affirming the order of the City Court of Buffalo, entered May 10, 1961, vacating the service of summons.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Annual Performance Report

Grantees under this program are required to submit an annual performance report (APR) through the International Resource Information System (IRIS). The Department provides grantees with the required password and other information needed to access the IRIS system. IRIS also includes a publicly accessible searchable database of abstracts of projects funded under OPE's international education programs.

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
49.303-4 Adjustment of indirect costs. ( a ) If the contract contains the clause at 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment, and it appears that adjustment of indirect costs will unduly delay final settlement, the TCO, after obtaining information from the appropriate audit agency, may agree with the contractor to— ( 1 ) Negotiate the amount of indirect costs for the contract period for which final indirect cost rates have not been negotiated, or to use billing rates as final rates for this period if the billing rates appear reasonable; or
( 2 ) Reserve any indirect cost adjustment in the final settlement agreement, pending establishment of negotiated rates under subpart 42.7.
( b ) When an amount of indirect cost is negotiated under subparagraph (a)(1) above, the contractor shall eliminate the indirect cost and the related direct costs on which it was based from the total pool and base used to compute indirect costs for other contracts performed during the applicable accounting period.
[48 FR 42447, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated at 61 FR 39221, July 26, 1996]
436.205 Statutory cost limitations. ( a ) When it appears that funds available for a project may be insufficient for all the desired features of construction, the contracting officer may provide in the solicitation for a base bid item covering the work generally as specified and for one or more additive or deductive bid items which progressively add or omit specified features of the work in a stated order of priority. In this case, the contracting officer shall insert the provision at 452.236-70, Additive or Deductive Items, in solicitations for construction.
( b ) In the alternative to the process in paragraph (a) of this section, the contracting officer may use the policies and procedures found in FAR 17.2.
#### 33.209 Suspected fraudulent claims.

If the contractor is unable to support any part of the claim and there is evidence that the inability is attributable to misrepresentation of fact or to fraud on the part of the contractor, the contracting officer shall refer the matter to the agency official responsible for investigating fraud.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended; Title IV, Part A, Subpart 2, Chapter 1, Sec. 402D; 20 U.S.C. 1070a-14     MS Word  (217K) |  PDF  (188K)
                - Legislation for SSS Grant Aid    MS Word  (22K)

## Regulations

                -  Official Final Regulations Amending TRIO Regulations, as published in the  Federal Register  on October 26, 2010. These final regulations amend the TRIO Training Program regulations. [   HTML ]
                - Title 34 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 642
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations  in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

TRIO Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov