[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 31 (Thursday, February 18, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10022-10025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03034]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2019-0573, FRL-10018-79-Region 10]


Air Plan Approval; Washington; Infrastructure Requirements for 
the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide and 2015 Ozone Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Whenever the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgates 
a new or revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), the 
Clean Air Act requires each state to make a State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) submission to establish that its SIP provides for the 
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the revised NAAQS. This 
type of SIP submission is commonly referred to as an infrastructure SIP 
submission. The EPA is approving the State of Washington's September 
30, 2019 and April 3, 2020, SIP submissions as meeting specific 
infrastructure requirements for the 2010 sulfur dioxide and 2015 ozone 
NAAQS.

DATES: This final rule is effective March 22, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2019-0573. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or 
other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. 
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on 
the internet and is publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly 
available docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability 
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth 
Avenue--Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-0256, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1b9a4bfa5ffbbb4b7b791b4a1b0ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8d0cdd6cc96d2dddedef8ddc8d996dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 10023]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.

I. Background Information

    On May 26, 2020, the EPA proposed to approve Washington's September 
30, 2019 and April 3, 2020, SIP submissions as meeting certain 
infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2010 
sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) and 2015 ozone NAAQS (85 FR 31421). The 
initial public comment period for this proposed action ended on June 
25, 2020. Due to an administrative error, the EPA omitted the technical 
support document (TSD) relevant to the proposed action from the docket 
during the initial comment period, open from May 26, 2020 to June 25, 
2020. The EPA corrected the administrative error and on September 3, 
2020, we provided an additional 30 days for public comment on the 
proposed action (85 FR 54960). The public comment period ended on 
October 5, 2020. The EPA received adverse comments on the proposal.

II. Response to Comments

    The EPA received two adverse comments during the initial comment 
period related to our administrative docket error that left out the TSD 
relevant to the proposed action. The EPA addressed these comments by 
including the TSD document in the docket and providing an additional 
30-day comment period. The EPA received one additional comment, 
unrelated to our administrative docket error, during the initial 
comment period. We have summarized and responded to the adverse comment 
below. The full text of the submitted comment may be found in the 
docket for this action.

Comment--Adequate Resources

    Summary--An anonymous commenter stated that, in its proposed 
approval of CAA section 110(a)(2)(E), the EPA failed to evaluate 
adequate funding and resources necessary to carry out the functions 
delegated to the state and required by the state to carry out the 
functions of the SIP. The commenter asserted that the EPA must audit 
Washington's finances and accounting to make an affirmative 
determination as to whether the state has the necessary funding and 
resources. The anonymous commenter also stated that the EPA should 
affirmatively determine whether Washington actually has the necessary 
personnel to carry out and operate programs required under the SIP in 
light of recent COVID-19 concerns.
    Response--CAA section 110(a)(2)(E)(i) requires each state to 
provide necessary assurances that the state will have adequate 
personnel, funding, and authority under state law necessary to carry 
out the SIP during the five years following the SIP submission.\1\ CAA 
section 110 does not mandate a specific methodology for the EPA to 
evaluate the adequacy of resources to implement the SIP. See 76 FR 
42549 (July 19, 2011), at 42554. The EPA disagrees with the commenter's 
assertion that an audit of the state's finances and accounting 
practices is required in order to satisfy the requirements of 
110(a)(2)(E)(i). The EPA's role in evaluating a SIP submission is to 
assure that the air agency's SIP contains the necessary structural 
requirements in order to meet the requirements of a new or revised 
NAAQS. The EPA's role in approving an infrastructure SIP submission is 
to determine whether the submission addresses the necessary 
requirements of the Act, not to evaluate the way in which a SIP is 
being implemented. See Montana Envtl. Info. Ctr. v. Thomas, 902 F.3d 
971, 978 (9th Cir. 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA guidance identifies a five-year period following the SIP 
submission as the relevant timeframe for this evaluation. See 
Stephen D. Page, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and 
Standards. ``Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and 
110(a)(2).'' Memorandum to EPA Air Division Directors, Regions 1 
through 10, September 13, 2013, at page 40 (2013 guidance).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In our proposed action, we identified Revised Code of Washington 
(RCW) 70.94 \2\ as providing the Washington Department of Ecology 
(Ecology) Director authority to hire personnel to carry out duties of 
the department, in coordination with local clean air agencies and the 
Energy Facilities Site Evaluation Council (funded and authorized 
separately under RCW 80.50). According to the Washington Department of 
Ecology Budget and Program Overview 2019-2021, Ecology has an operating 
budget of $43.7 million to perform its air program functions ($10.1 
million from federal funds, with the remainder from state funds and 
other permit and fee programs). Specifically, Washington receives CAA 
sections 103 and 105 grant funds from the EPA and provides state 
matching funds necessary to carry out SIP requirements. As part of our 
September 3, 2020 reopening of the public comment period, we 
supplemented the docket with the general CAA section 105 program grant 
supporting materials for informational purposes, including our most 
recent review of performance metrics under the grant at the time.\3\ 
The EPA expects that the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacts on state 
revenues and could theoretically impact a state's ability to adequately 
implement its SIP. However, the impacts of the pandemic on Washington's 
personnel and resources available to satisfy the requirements of CAA 
section 110(a)(2)(E) in the future is speculative at best. Based on 
assurances in the state's submission and the analysis conducted as part 
of the EPA's grant programs, we have a reasonable basis to conclude 
that Washington has satisfied the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(E).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Recently re-codified to RCW 70A.15, with no substantive 
changes to the statute.
    \3\ The EPA subsequently updated our review of performance 
metrics under the CAA section 105 grant program for Federal Fiscal 
Year 2020, which is included in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA finds that Washington has provided the necessary assurances 
of adequate sources of personnel, funding, and authority under state 
law to implement its SIP for purposes of the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> and 
2015 ozone NAAQS, consistent with the EPA's 2013 guidance. Therefore, 
it is appropriate to finalize the proposed finding that Washington's 
SIP satisfies the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(E).

III. Final Action

    The EPA is approving Washington's September 30, 2019 and April 3, 
2020, infrastructure SIP submissions as meeting specific infrastructure 
requirements of the CAA. We find that the Washington SIP meets the 
following CAA section 110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the 2010 
SO<INF>2</INF> and 2015 ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C) (except for those 
provisions covered by the PSD FIP), (D)(i)(II) (except for those 
provisions covered by the PSD and regional haze FIPs), (D)(ii) (except 
for those provisions covered by the PSD FIP), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J) 
(except for those provisions covered by the PSD FIP), (K), (L), and 
(M).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:

[[Page 10024]]

    <bullet> Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
    <bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    <bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    <bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    <bullet> Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    <bullet> Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
    <bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
    <bullet> Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
    <bullet> Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000). Washington's SIP is approved to apply on non-trust land within 
the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known 
as the 1873 Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement 
Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided state and 
local agencies in Washington authority over activities on non-trust 
lands within the 1873 Survey Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA 
provided a consultation opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a letter 
dated July 15, 2019.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 19, 2021. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 9, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart WW--Washington

0
2. In Sec.  52.2470, Table 2 in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an 
entry for ``110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements--Sulfur Dioxide 
Standards and 2015 Ozone Standards'' immediately below the entry 
``Interstate Transport for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS'' to read as follows:


Sec.  52.2470  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                                Table 2--Attainment, Maintenance, and Other Plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Applicable          State
      Name of SIP provision            geographic or      submittal     EPA approval date       Explanations
                                    nonattainment area       date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                110(a)(2) Infrastructure and Interstate Transport
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
110(a)(2) Infrastructure           Statewide...........  9/30/19 and  2/18/2021, [Insert    This action
 Requirements--Sulfur Dioxide                                4/03/20   Federal Register      addresses the
 Standards and 2015 Ozone                                              citation].            following CAA
 Standards.                                                                                  section 110(a)(2)
                                                                                             elements: (A), (B),
                                                                                             (C), (D)(i)(II),
                                                                                             (D)(ii), (E), (F),
                                                                                             (G), (H), (J), (K),
                                                                                             (L), and (M).
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 10025]]

[FR Doc. 2021-03034 Filed 2-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>