alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
49.206-1 Submission of settlement proposals. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of the termination clause, the contractor should promptly submit to the TCO a settlement proposal for the amount claimed because of the termination. The final settlement proposal must be submitted within one year from the effective date of the termination, unless the period is extended by the TCO. Termination charges under a single prime contract involving two or more divisions or units of the prime contractor may be consolidated and included in a single settlement proposal.
( b ) The settlement proposal must cover all cost elements including settlements with subcontractors and any proposed profit. With the consent of the TCO, proposals may be filed in successive steps covering separate portions of the contractor's costs. Such interim proposals shall include all costs of a particular type, except as the TCO may authorize otherwise.
( c ) Settlement proposals must be on the forms prescribed in 49.602 unless the forms are inadequate for a particular contract. Settlement proposals must be in reasonable detail supported by adequate accounting data. Actual, standard (appropriately adjusted), or average costs may be used in preparing settlement proposals if they are determined under generally recognized accounting principles consistently followed by the contractor. When actual, standard, or average costs are not reasonably available, estimated costs may be used if the method of arriving at the estimates is approved by the TCO. Contractors shall not be required to maintain unduly elaborate cost accounting systems merely because their contracts may subsequently be terminated.
( d ) The contractor may use the Settlement Proposal (Short Form), SF 1438 (see 49.602-1(d) and 53.249), when the total proposal is less than $10,000, unless otherwise instructed by the TCO. Settlement proposals that would normally be included in a single settlement proposal; e.g., those based on a series of separate orders for the same item under one contract, should be consolidated whenever possible and not divided to bring them below $10,000.
( e ) The Schedule of Accounting Information, SF 1439, must be submitted for each termination under a contract for which a settlement proposal is submitted, except when the Standard Form 1438 is used. Although several interim proposals may be submitted, SF 1439 need be submitted only once unless, subsequent to filing the original form, major changes occur in the information submitted.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II

In the Matter of the No. 53890

- 3

- II Personal Restraint of
JAMES H. ROWE, II,

Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

M AXA , C. J.

– James Rowe II seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from the 2018
revocation of his community custody by the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board and the Board’s setting of new minimum terms of confinement. The Board had charged Rowe with three

violations of the conditions of hi s community custody: (1) viewing pornographic material, (2)
failing to successfully participate in sex offender treatment by accessing social media sites, and
(3) failing to successfully complete sex offender treatment by being terminated from treatment on
February 8, 2018. 1 Rowe pleaded guilty to the violations, and the Board revoked his community
custody. The Board later set his new minimum term at 24 months and, in 2019, extended his
minimum term by 18 months.
Rowe now argues that the Board erred in revoking his community custody because the
following community custody condition is unconstitutionally vague:
(17) The defendant shall not use or possess any pornographic material as defined by the sexual deviancy treatment provider and the [community corrections officer].
Pet., Ex. 3 at 2.

1 The Board had charged Rowe with a fourth violation, but dismissed it for lack of probable cause. Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two
April 7, 2020No. 53890

- 3

- II

2

Regarding the Board’s revocation of Rowe’s community custody, we review the Board ’s

decision for an abuse of discretion. In re Pers. Restraint of Dyer , 175 Wn.2d 186, 196, 283 P.3d
1103 (2012). Given that Rowe, who was represented by counsel, pleaded guilty to the three
violations, including those not related to pornography, he fails to show that the Board abused its
discretion in revoking his community custody.
Regarding the argument that condition 17 is unconstitutionally vague under State v. Bahl , 164 Wn.2d 739, 758, 193 P.3d 678 (2008), the State concedes that Rowe is correct and that
condition 17 should be modified to make it constitutionally acceptable. We grant Rowe’s petition and remand to the trial court to modify community custody
condition 17. We deny the remainder of his petition. We deny Rowe’s request for appointment

of counsel.
A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,

it is so ordered.

MAXA, C.J. We concur:

SUTTON, J.

GLASGOW, J.
## Stove Proficiency and Particulate Emission Rates

prepared by:

James E. Houck a nd Jeremy Clark

OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.

13327 NE Airport Way

Portland, OR 97230

November 11, 2009

### Summary

As per §60.535(7) Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; New Residential

Wood Heaters (Federal Register v. 53, n. 38, February, 26,1988), acc redited laboratories, “Agree

to participate annually in a proficiency tes ting program conducted by the Administrator.”

Between 1993 and 2000 a single stove model was used for this proficiency testing program. The

results were obtained from EPA for results submitted by eight laboratories during that time

period. The variation in resu lts is shown in Figure 1.051015202530354045505560012345678

Emission Rate (g/h)BurnRate(Kg/h)5H5Gadjustedto5HMethod7.5g/hNSPSStd.3.60g/hModelCert.ValueFigure1:5HParticulateEmissionRatesasComparedtoU.S.EPACertifiedValue.U.S.EPANSPSProficiencyTestingProgram40CFR§60.534,datashowtestingbyeightlaboratorieswithasinglenon‐certifiedstovemodel(1993‐2000)followingNSPSmethods28and5Gor5H.(DatacourtesyofU.S.EPA)1Table 2

Particulate Emission Rates, Proficiency Data, Single Stove Model (1993

‐ 2000)

Method n Mean Median Range Standard Deviation

5H 24 4.64 3.44 0.82

– 13.02 3.65

5G adjusted 78 9.86 8.20 2.20

– 54.14 7.11

5H + 5G adj 102 8.63 7.24 0.82

– 54.14 6.82

NSPS Standard

= 7.5 g/h

Model Certification Value

= 3.60 g/h

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard J. Paige, Appellant.

— Judgment insofar as it imposes sentence unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to reduce the sentence to time served, and otherwise judgment affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Jefferson County Court — assault, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
# C_2019016EN.01000101.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 16/01)

Last publication

OJ C 4, 7.1.2019

Past publications

OJ C 455, 17.12.2018

OJ C 445, 10.12.2018

OJ C 436, 3.12.2018

OJ C 427, 26.11.2018

OJ C 408, 12.11.2018

OJ C 399, 5.11.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
            GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES 
            Computation of Pro Forma Earnings per Common Share 
   
                   (In thousands, except per share data) 
                                (Unaudited)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Year Ended
                                                                              December 31,
                                                                          --------------------
<S>                                                                       <C>        <C>
                                                                            1996       1995
                                                                          ---------  ---------

Net Income                                                                $  46,965  $  28,894
                                                                          ---------  ---------
                                                                          ---------  ---------
Average shares issued and outstanding (after giving effect to the
  Recapitalization)                                                          65,403     65,403

Exercise of certain stock options with the Offering                           3,949      3,949

Incremental shares applicable to stock options outstanding after the
  exercise of certain stock options with the Offering                         4,624      4,624

Shares issued pursuant to the Offering                                        4,559      4,559
                                                                          ---------  ---------

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding             78,535     78,535
                                                                          ---------  ---------
                                                                          ---------  ---------

Net income per common and common equivalent share                         $    0.60  $    0.37
                                                                          ---------  ---------
                                                                          ---------  ---------
</TABLE>

Note: Shares and stock options issued prior to October 16, 1996, date of the
      Offering (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements) are 
      treated as outstanding for all reported periods.
36.513 Accident prevention. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-13, Accident Prevention, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. If the contract will involve work of a long duration or hazardous nature, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its *Alternate I.*
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause or the clause with its *Alternate I* in solicitations and contracts when a contract for services to be performed at Government facilities (see FAR part 37) is contemplated, and technical representatives advise that special precautions are appropriate.
( c ) The contracting officer should inform the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or other cognizant Federal, State, or local officials, of instances where the contractor has been notified to take immediate action to correct serious or imminent dangers.
[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 56 FR 55375, Oct. 25, 1991; 60 FR 34759, July 3, 1995]
Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Development Grants

# Panel Review by Applicant

## Alabama

Bottom of Form

# _1479584730.unknown
#### 422.302 Liquidated damages and overtime pay.

Heads of contracting activities (HCA's) are authorized to review determinations of liquidated damages due under section 104(c) of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, and to take remedial action, if appropriate, in accordance with FAR 22.302(c). Contractors or subcontractors may request review of administrative determinations of liquidated damages by written notice to the contracting officer. The contracting officer shall promptly forward appeals of liquidated damages determinations to the HCA.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

New Dear Project Director Letter - ED HHS Collaboration in Support of Disconnected Youth - March 16, 2023

New The FY 2023 Child Care Access Means Parents in School Program Notice Inviting Applications has been published in the Federal Register.
The 2021-22 Annual Performance Report (APR) for the Child Care Access Means Parents in School (CCAMPIS) Program has been made available to Project Directors. The deadline for the APR is March 3, 2023. 

**Program Office:**Student Service

**CFDA Number:** 84.335**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants
Program Description
This program supports the participation of low-income parents in postsecondary education throughthe provision of campus-based child care services.
Types of Projects
Funds are used to support or establish campus-based child care programs primarily serving the needs of low-income students enrolled in IHEs. Grants may be used for before- and after-school services. In addition, grants may be used to serve the child care needs of the community served by the institution.
   Printable view  Last Modified: 06/14/2023How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity

 
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
- vote.gov
Exhibit 10.03





Exhibit 10.03




Summary of Directors’ Compensation




Under Singapore law, the Company may only provide cash compensation to its non-employee directors
for services rendered in their capacity as directors with the prior approval from its shareholders
at a general meeting. At the 2009 Annual General Meeting, the Company’s shareholders approved the
following cash compensation arrangements for the non-employee directors of the Company: (i) annual
cash compensation of $75,000, payable quarterly in arrears, for services rendered as a director;
(ii) additional annual cash compensation of $50,000, payable quarterly in arrears to the Chairman
of the Audit Committee (if appointed) of the Board of Directors for services rendered as Chairman
of the Audit Committee and for his or her participation on the Audit Committee; (iii) additional
annual cash compensation of $15,000, payable quarterly in arrears to each other non-employee
director who serves on the Audit Committee for his or her participation on the Audit Committee;
(iv) additional annual cash compensation of $25,000, payable quarterly in arrears to the Chairman
of the Compensation Committee (if appointed) of the Board of Directors for services rendered as
Chairman of the Compensation Committee and for his or her participation on the Compensation
Committee; (v) additional annual cash compensation of $10,000, payable quarterly in arrears to
each other non-employee director who serves on the Compensation Committee for his or her
participation on the Compensation Committee; (vi) additional annual cash compensation of $10,000,
payable quarterly in arrears to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
(if appointed) of the Board of Directors for services rendered as Chairman of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee and for his or her participation on the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee; and (vii) additional annual cash compensation of $5,000, payable quarterly in
arrears for participation on any standing committee (other than the Audit and Compensation
Committees) of the Board of Directors.



The Company’s shareholders also approved additional annual cash compensation for the non-executive
Chairman of $100,000, payable quarterly in arrears, for services rendered as the non-executive
Chairman. The non-executive Chairman also receives all other compensation payable to our
non-employee directors, other than cash compensation payable for service on any Board committees.



The non-employee directors, including the non-executive Chairman, also receive equity compensation
as described in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2009 Annual General Meeting.



The standing committees of the Board of Directors of the Company are currently the Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>   0000105860
<NAME>  WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
<SUBSIDIARY>
<NUMBER> 006
<NAME>  WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       681,701
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         945
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           71,361
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         11,334
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   59,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  824,674
<COMMON>                                        137,214
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                         2,236
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             114,772
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  254,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                       2,482
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            263,603
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                9,109
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                             0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                        0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    40,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                             0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                           0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  255,258
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   824,674
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       188,834
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              5,012
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      159,952
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      164,964
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          23,870
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  172
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   24,042
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         12,407
<NET-INCOME>                                     11,635
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          52
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    11,583
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         14,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        10,176
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           43,642
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>
# C_2020434EN.01000401.xml

| 15.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 434/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 434/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

14 December 2020

(2020/C 434/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2162 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4421 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90700 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1930 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0776 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 155,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5833 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,317 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 353,63 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4373 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8707 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,5728 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6064 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5476 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4274 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7101 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6202 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 327,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,2339 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9588 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5290 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 216,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9299 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,417 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 88,7888 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,583 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1237 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,3753 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,4505 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2162

JPY

Japanese yen

126,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4421

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90700

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1930

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0776

ISK

Iceland króna

155,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5833

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,317

HUF

Hungarian forint

353,63

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4373

RON

Romanian leu

4,8707

TRY

Turkish lira

9,5728

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6064

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5476

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4274

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7101

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6202

KRW

South Korean won

1 327,50

ZAR

South African rand

18,2339

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9588

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5290

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 216,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9299

PHP

Philippine peso

58,417

RUB

Russian rouble

88,7888

THB

Thai baht

36,583

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1237

MXN

Mexican peso

24,3753

INR

Indian rupee

89,4505

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---