alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 452.211-70 Brand Name or Equal.

As prescribed in 411.171, insert the following provision:

# Brand Name or Equal (NOV 1996)

(As used in this provision, the term “brand name” includes identification of products by make and model.)

(a) If items called for by this solicitation have been identified by a “brand name or equal” description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Offers of “equal” products (including products of the brand name manufacturer other than the one described by brand name) will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the offer (see clause 452.211-71) and are determined by the Contracting Officer to meet fully the salient characteristics requirements listed in the solicitation.

(b) Unless the offeror clearly indicates in its offer that it is offering an “equal” product, the offeror shall be considered as offering the brand name product(s) referenced in the solicitation.

(c)(1) If the offeror proposes to furnish an “equal” product or products, the brand name(s), if any, and any other required information about the product(s) to be furnished shall be inserted in the space provided in the solicitation. The evaluation of offers and the determination as to the equality of the product(s) offered shall be the responsibility of the Government and will be based on information furnished by the offeror or identified in its offer as well as other information reasonably available to the contracting activity. Caution to offerors: The contracting activity is not responsible for locating or securing any information which is not identified in the offer and is not reasonably available to the contracting activity. Accordingly, to assure that sufficient information is available, the offeror must furnish as a part of its offer all descriptive material (such as cuts, illustrations, drawings, or other information) necessary for the contracting activity to (i) determine whether the product offered meets the salient characteristics requirement of the solicitation, and (ii) establish exactly what the offeror proposes to furnish and what the Government would be binding itself to purchase by making an award. The information furnished may include specific reference to information previously furnished or to information otherwise available to the contracting activity.

(2) If an offeror proposes to modify a product so as to make it conform to the requirements of the solicitation, the offer shall include (i) a clear description of such proposed modifications and (ii) clearly marked descriptive material to show the proposed modifications.

(End of provision)

[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996. Redesignated at 63 FR 26996, May 15, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 50, Jan. 3, 2005]
45.602-2 Reutilization priorities. Plant clearance officers shall initiate reutilization actions for all property not meeting the abandonment or destruction criteria of 45.603(b). Authorized methods, listed in descending order from highest to lowest priority, are— ( a ) Reuse within the owning agency;
( b ) Transfer of educationally useful equipment to schools and nonprofit organizations (see Executive Order 12999, Educational Technology: Ensuring Opportunity For All Children In The Next Century, April 17, 1996, and 15 U.S.C. 3710(i));
( c ) Report to GSA for reuse within the Federal Government or donation as surplus property;
( d ) Dispose of the following property in accordance with agency procedures without reporting to GSA: ( 1 ) Property determined appropriate for abandonment or destruction (see Federal Management Regulation (FMR) 102-36.305, 41 CFR 102-36.305).
( 2 ) Property furnished to nonappropriated fund activities (see FMR 102-36.165, 41 CFR 102-36.165).
( 3 ) Foreign excess personal property (see FMR 102-36.380, 41 CFR 102-36.380).
( 4 ) Scrap, except aircraft in scrap condition.
( 5 ) Perishables, defined for the purposes of this section as any personal property subject to spoilage or decay.
( 6 ) Trading stamps and bonus goods.
( 7 ) Hazardous waste or toxic and hazardous materials.
( 8 ) Controlled substances.
( 9 ) Property dangerous to public health and safety.
( 10 ) Classified items or property determined to be sensitive for reasons of national security; and
( e ) Dispose of nuclear materials (see 45.603-3(b)(5)) in accordance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, applicable state licenses, applicable Federal regulations, and agency regulations.
[77 FR 12943, Mar. 2, 2012]
# C_2020053EN.01000501.xml

| 17.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2020/C 53/05)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Italy

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Italy

Subject of commemoration: 150th anniversary of the birth of Maria Montessori

Description of the design: A portrait of Maria Montessori in a geometric composition with some of didactic elements drawn from her educational system. In the right field, ‘RI’, acronym of the Italian Republic; on the left, ‘R’ ,identifying the Mint of Rome; on the right, ‘LDS’, initials of the designer Luciana De Simoni; at the top and bottom, the dates ‘1870’ e ‘2020’, the year of birth of the Italian pedagogue and that of coin’s issue, respectively; around the portrait, the inscription ‘MARIA MONTESSORI’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 3 000 000

Date of issue: June 2020

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Te xas

April 13, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00123

- CV

Roberto Carlos MENDIVES , Sr.

,

Appellant

v.

Angela Rose MENDIVES

, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI00877 Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On March 24, 2016, we ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court by April
4, 2016, that (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. Appellant filed written proof on April 8, 2016, and the reporter’s record has be en filed. Our March 24,

2016 order is satisfied.

Appellant’s brief is due on May 9, 2016. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sa id
court on this 13th day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Stratigraphicnomenclature of the Newark Supergroup of eastern North America**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1572
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000962455
 
August 27, 2018
Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                         Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800  Houston, TX  77002-5218              Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2000 for Dyco Oil and Gas Program
1983-2 Limited Partnership.



                                    //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                                    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.






Houston, Texas
January 31, 2001
#### 2813.401 General.

DOJ contracting activities are authorized to use the fast payment procedures prescribed in FAR subpart 13.4 solely for utility service payments.
#### 37.600 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for acquiring services using performance-based acquisition methods.
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 614 Filed: 01/17/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:22935
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 614 Filed: 01/17/18 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:22936
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 614 Filed: 01/17/18 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:22937
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 614 Filed: 01/17/18 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:22938
v-05746 Document #: 614 Filed: 01/17/18 Page 5 of 5 Pag
#### 50.100 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Approving authority* means an agency official or contract adjustment board authorized to approve actions under Pub. L. 85-804 and E.O. 10789.

*Secretarial level* means a level at or above the level of a deputy assistant agency head, or a contract adjustment board.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
               UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A-1 of Cybrdi Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xue Bu, the
principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/Xue Bu
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Name: Xue Bu, Principal Financial Officer
                                      Date: December 18, 2006
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                               | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Vocational and Adult Education Home |
|                                               |

**Program Office:**Adult Education and Literacy

**CFDA Number:** 84.002**Program Type:** Formula Grants

This program provides grants to states to fund localprograms of adult education and literacy services,including workplace literacy services; family literacyservices; English literacy programs and integratedEnglish literacy-civics education programs.Participation in these programs is limited to adultsand out-of-school youths age 16 and older who are notenrolled or required to be enrolled in secondary schoolunder state law.

NACTEP grantees use funds for expenses associated with developing rigorous academic and technical standards, especially in preparation for high-skill, high-wage, or in--demand occupations in established or emerging professions; providing professional development to improve the quality of career and technical education teachers, principals, administrators, and counselors; and providing stipends, tuition, books, fees, childcare, counseling, job placement, transportation, supplies, specialized tools and uniforms that are necessary for students to fully and effectively participate in CTE programs.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
3.104-6 Ethics advisory opinions regarding prohibitions on a former official's acceptance of compensation from a contractor. ( a ) An official or former official of a Federal agency who does not know whether he or she is or would be precluded by 41 U.S.C. 2104 (see 3.104-3(d)) from accepting compensation from a particular contractor may request advice from the appropriate agency ethics official before accepting such compensation.
( b ) The request for an advisory opinion must be in writing, include all relevant information reasonably available to the official or former official, and be dated and signed. The request must include information about the— ( 1 ) Procurement(s), or decision(s) on matters under 3.104-3(d)(1)(iii), involving the particular contractor, in which the individual was or is involved, including contract or solicitation numbers, dates of solicitation or award, a description of the supplies or services procured or to be procured, and contract amount;
( 2 ) Individual's participation in the procurement or decision, including the dates or time periods of that participation, and the nature of the individual's duties, responsibilities, or actions; and
( 3 ) Contractor, including a description of the products or services produced by the division or affiliate of the contractor from whom the individual proposes to accept compensation.
( c ) Within 30 days after receipt of a request containing complete information, or as soon thereafter as practicable, the agency ethics official should issue an opinion on whether the proposed conduct would violate 41 U.S.C. 2104.
( d ) ( 1 ) If complete information is not included in the request, the agency ethics official may ask the requester to provide more information or request information from other persons, including the source selection authority, the contracting officer, or the requester's immediate supervisor.
( 2 ) In issuing an opinion, the agency ethics official may rely upon the accuracy of information furnished by the requester or other agency sources, unless he or she has reason to believe that the information is fraudulent, misleading, or otherwise incorrect.
( 3 ) If the requester is advised in a written opinion by the agency ethics official that the requester may accept compensation from a particular contractor, and accepts such compensation in good faith reliance on that advisory opinion, then neither the requester nor the contractor will be found to have knowingly violated 41 U.S.C. 2104. If the requester or the contractor has actual knowledge or reason to believe that the opinion is based upon fraudulent, misleading, or otherwise incorrect information, their reliance upon the opinion will not be deemed to be in good faith.
[67 FR 13059, Mar. 20, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 24196, Apr. 29, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 17

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
   approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2023

 Mr. Comer (for himself, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Grothman, 
Ms. Mace, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Pfluger, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Fallon, 
 Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Norman, Mr. LaTurner, and Mr. Sessions) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
   approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-
640), enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia on October 18, 
2022, and transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of the 
District of Columbia Home Rule Act on January 10, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Experiences of LGBTQ People in Four-Year Colleges and Graduate Programs      

# Report: Experiences of LGBTQ People in Four-Year Colleges and Graduate Programs

This study (PDF, 65 pages) provides new information about the experiences of LGBTQ people who have attended four-year college or graduate school using data collected from the nationally representative Access to Higher Education Survey. Information about campus climate, experiences of belonging, discrimination, violence, mental health, educational aspirations, and sources of financial support were explored for LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ people ages 18 to 40. **Learn more.**
#### In the Matter of John L. Cutelli, Petitioner, v Donald Dilworth, as Commissioner of Police of the County of Suffolk, Respondent.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated April 19, 1978 and made after a hearing, which found petitioner guilty of departmental charges and fined him a total of 30 vacation days. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings, and the punishment imposed is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). There was no impropriety in the fact that the Deputy Police Commissioner acted as the hearing officer. Although the Deputy Commissioner oversees the division within the police department which is responsible for disciplinary proceedings, it was not shown that he had any personal involvement with the investigation and preliminary proceedings relating to the charges in the instant case (see *Matter of Aiello v Tempera,*65 AD2d 791; *Matter of Gladstone v Kelley,*52 AD2d 583, mot for lv to app den 39 NY2d 709). We have considered the petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Mangano, JJ., concur.
2915.604 Agency points of contact. ( a ) The Director of Strategy and Administration (S&A) within the OSPE will be the point of contact for receipt of unsolicited proposals. This responsibility may be delegated by the Director of S&A. Only the cognizant contracting officer has the authority to bind the Government by accepting an unsolicited proposal.
( b ) The OSPE Director of Strategy and Administration is responsible for handling unsolicited proposals to ensure that unsolicited proposals are controlled, evaluated, safeguarded, and disposed of in accordance with FAR subpart 15.6.
( c ) The OSPE Director of Strategy and Administration may not consider an unsolicited proposal if the proposal resembles an upcoming solicitation or a procurement identified in the current annual acquisition plan.