alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021183EN.01000201.xml

| 11.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 May 2021

(2021/C 183/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2169 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86195 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1235 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0939 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0008 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,591 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 357,26 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5631 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9248 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,0495 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5433 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4743 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4504 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6673 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6110 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 353,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0843 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8045 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5415 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 189,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9984 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,247 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,0154 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,809 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3848 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,2464 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,2585 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2169

JPY

Japanese yen

132,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86195

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1235

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0939

ISK

Iceland króna

150,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0008

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,591

HUF

Hungarian forint

357,26

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5631

RON

Romanian leu

4,9248

TRY

Turkish lira

10,0495

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5433

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4743

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4504

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6673

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6110

KRW

South Korean won

1 353,14

ZAR

South African rand

17,0843

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8045

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5415

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 189,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9984

PHP

Philippine peso

58,247

RUB

Russian rouble

90,0154

THB

Thai baht

37,809

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3848

MXN

Mexican peso

24,2464

INR

Indian rupee

89,2585

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
41.402 Rate changes and regulatory intervention. ( a ) When a change is proposed to rates or terms and conditions of service to the Government, the agency shall promptly determine whether the proposed change is reasonable, justified, and not discriminatory.
( b ) If a change is proposed to rates or terms and conditions of service that may be of interest to other Federal agencies, and intervention before a regulatory body is considered justified, the matter shall be referred to GSA. The agency may request from GSA a delegation of authority for the agency to intervene on behalf of the consumer interests of the Federal executive agencies (see 41.301).
( c ) Pursuant to 52.241-7, Change in Rates or Terms and Conditions of Service for Regulated Services, if a regulatory body approves a rate change, any rate change shall be made a part of the contract by unilateral contract modification or otherwise documented in accordance with agency procedures. The approved applicable rate shall be effective on the date determined by the regulatory body and resulting rates and charges shall be paid promptly to avoid late payment provisions. Copies of the modification containing the approved rate change shall be sent to the agency's paying office or office responsible for verifying billed amounts (see 41.401).
( d ) If the utility supplier is not regulated and the rates, terms, and conditions of service are subject to negotiation pursuant to the clause at 52.241-8, Change in Rates or Terms and Conditions of Service for Unregulated Services, any rate change shall be made a part of the contract by contract modification, with copies sent to the agency's paying office or office responsible for verifying billed amounts.
#### 352.226-6 Indian Economic Enterprise Subcontracting Limitations

As prescribed in HHSAR 326.604-2(e)(3), the Contracting Officer shall insert the following clause:

# Indian Economic Enterprise Subcontracting Limitations

(a) Definitions as used in this clause.

(1) *Indian Economic Enterprise* means any business activity owned by one or more Indians or Indian Tribes that is established for the purpose of profit provided that: The combined Indian or Indian Tribe ownership must constitute not less than 51 percent of the enterprise; the Indians or Indian Tribes must, together, receive at least a majority of the earnings from the contract; and the management and daily business operations of an enterprise must be controlled by one or more individuals who are Indians. To ensure actual control over the enterprise, the individuals must possess requisite management or technical capabilities directly related to the primary industry in which the enterprise conducts business. The enterprise must meet these requirements throughout the following time periods:

(i) At the time an offer is made in response to a written solicitation;

(ii) At the time of the contract award; and

(iii) During the full term of the contract.

(2) *Subcontract* means any contract, as defined in FAR subpart 2.1, entered into by a subcontractor to furnish supplies or services for performance of the prime contractor or subcontractor. It includes, but is not limited to, purchase orders, and changes and modifications to purchase orders.

(3) *Subcontractor* means any supplier, distributor, vendor, or firm that furnishes supplies or services to or for a prime contractor or another subcontractor.

(b) Required Percentages of work by the concern. The contractor must comply with FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting clause in allocating what percentage of work to subcontract. The contractor shall not subcontract work exceeding the subcontract limitations in FAR 52.219-14 to a concern other than a responsible Indian Economic Enterprise.

(c) Any work that an IEE subcontractor does not perform with its own employee shall be considered subcontracted work for the purpose of calculating percentages of subcontract work in accordance with FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting.

(d) Cooperation. The contractor must:

(1) Carry out the requirements of this clause to the fullest extent; and

(2) Cooperate in any study or survey that the CO, Indian Health Service or its agents may conduct to verify the contractor's compliance with this clause.

(e) Incorporation in Subcontracts. The contractor must incorporate the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (e), in all subcontracts for general services, A&E services and construction awarded under this contract.

(End of clause)

[87 FR 2077, Jan. 13, 2022]
#### 452.247-70 Delivery Location.

As prescribed in 447.302, insert a clause substantially as follows:

# Delivery Location (FEB 1988)

Shipment of deliverable items, other than reports, shall be to: ______.*

(End of clause)

- *Contracting Officer shall insert appropriate identifying data.*
#### 52.227-8 [Reserved]
#### Anna M. Foster, appellee, v. Yellow Cab Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,666.

Action for negligent injury to automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. James J. O’Toole, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed July 13, 1926.

Blake & Levinson, for appellant; Harris J. Blake, Jr., and James R. Hanrahan, of counsel.

No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 4.202 Agency distribution requirements.

Agencies shall limit additional distribution requirements to the minimum necessary for proper performance of essential functions. When contracts are assigned for administration to a contract administration office located in an agency different from that of the contracting office (see part 42), the two agencies shall agree on any necessary distribution in addition to that prescribed in 4.201.

[48 FR 42113, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 84 FR 19840, May 6, 2019]
#### 48.104 Sharing arrangements.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 49 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  Union Calendar No. 73
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 49

                          [Report No. 118-96]

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
    Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2023

Mr. Stauber (for himself, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. 
 Flood, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. Perry, Mr. Smith of 
 Missouri, and Mrs. Boebert) submitted the following joint resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

                              June 5, 2023

      Additional sponsors: Mr. Zinke, Mr. Fulcher, and Ms. Hageman

                              June 5, 2023

  Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the 
 Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to 
                               be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
    Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating 
to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species 
Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat'' (87 Fed. Reg. 73488; published 
November 30, 2022), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                                  Union Calendar No. 73

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 49

                          [Report No. 118-96]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
    Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 5, 2023

   Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
                    Union and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 223 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 223

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
 Protection Agency relating to ``Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum 
   and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, 
                  Including Netting and Exemptions''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2024

   Mr. Grothman submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
 Protection Agency relating to ``Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum 
   and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, 
                  Including Netting and Exemptions''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: 
Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and 
Exemptions'' (89 Fed. Reg. 91094 (November 18, 2024)), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
(March 8, 1979)

#### Ella M. Thrower et al., Respondents, v John J. Smith et al., Respondents, and Isadore Perez, Appellant.

Motion by the estate of Max Berens to amend the remittitur by adding a provision stating that questions of fact have not been considered or that the questions of fact have been considered and this court would not grant a new trial or hearing upon such questions of fact. Motion granted to the extent that the decision and order both dated July 3, 1978 [62 AD2d 907] are amended by adding, following the decretal paragraph, the following: "Questions of fact were not considered.” Titone, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
# C_2018233EN.01000401.xml

| 4.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 July 2018

(2018/C 233/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1665 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4506 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88350 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3123 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1573 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 124,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4655 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,073 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 327,35 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3915 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6615 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,4444 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5761 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5344 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1506 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7281 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5921 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 298,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9718 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7481 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3845 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 766,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7208 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,249 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,6468 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,681 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5429 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9451 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,9310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1665

JPY

Japanese yen

129,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4506

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88350

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3123

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1573

ISK

Iceland króna

124,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4655

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,073

HUF

Hungarian forint

327,35

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3915

RON

Romanian leu

4,6615

TRY

Turkish lira

5,4444

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5761

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5344

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1506

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7281

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5921

KRW

South Korean won

1 298,07

ZAR

South African rand

15,9718

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7481

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3845

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 766,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7208

PHP

Philippine peso

62,249

RUB

Russian rouble

73,6468

THB

Thai baht

38,681

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5429

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9451

INR

Indian rupee

79,9310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 70 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 70

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 
                               25, 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2023

Mr. Gosar submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 
                               25, 2011.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, pursuant to section 202 
of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national 
emergency declared by the finding of the President on February 25, 
2011, in Executive Order 13566 is hereby terminated.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.4


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                             UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY
                         (required by Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection  with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended June
30, 2004 of Union Electric  Company (the "Company") as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the "Form  10-Q"),  I, Warner L.
Baxter, chief financial officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Form 10-Q fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 9, 2004



                                         /s/ Warner L. Baxter
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Warner L. Baxter
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2018451EN.01000301.xml

| 14.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

13 December 2018

(2018/C 451/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1371 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4647 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89848 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3020 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1287 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7388 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,829 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,14 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2925 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6515 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,0968 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5729 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5193 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8803 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6564 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5587 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 278,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1227 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8246 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3935 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 496,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7531 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,888 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,4593 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,195 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4083 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9031 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,4280 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1371

JPY

Japanese yen

129,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4647

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89848

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3020

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1287

ISK

Iceland króna

140,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7388

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,829

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,14

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2925

RON

Romanian leu

4,6515

TRY

Turkish lira

6,0968

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5729

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5193

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8803

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6564

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5587

KRW

South Korean won

1 278,56

ZAR

South African rand

16,1227

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8246

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3935

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 496,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7531

PHP

Philippine peso

59,888

RUB

Russian rouble

75,4593

THB

Thai baht

37,195

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4083

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9031

INR

Indian rupee

81,4280

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
H. J. Res. 30 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-three 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ‘‘Prudence 

and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights’’. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 73822 (December 1, 2022)), 

and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Orlo F. Fairfield, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court of Saratoga County denying without a hearing his motion for a writ of error *coram nobis*vacating and setting aside a judgment convicting him on his plea of guilty of the crime of carnal abuse of a child in violation of section 483-a of the Penal Law. The claims advanced in appellant’s affidavit are: (1) that he was unlawfully arrested because the arresting officers had no warrant; (2) that there was an unreasonable delay in his arraignment before the Magistrate; *(3)*that the evidence before the Grand Jury was insufficient to warrant his indictment; (4) that he was not arrested until seven months after the father of the child had reported to the State Police the commission of the acts upon which the subsequent indictment was based and (5) that he possesses evidence which would impugn the infant’s credibility. None of the foregoing allegations is sufficient to invoke the writ applied for. *(People*v. *Sullivan,*3 N Y 2d 196; *People*v. *Wurzler,*278 App. Div. 608.) Other eonelusory statements imputing unfaithfulness to appellant’s assigned counsel and unfairness to the sentencing court are wholly without factual support in the record. It is apparent that defendant’s rights were carefully safeguarded in every stage of the proceedings. *(People*v. *Neeley,*4 A D 2d 1019.) Order unanimously *993affirmed, without, costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.