alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 48 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 48

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights 
                        of natural persons only.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2023

  Ms. Jayapal (for herself, Mr. Keating, Ms. Sanchez, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
Tonko, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Beyer, and Ms. Williams of Georgia) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights 
                        of natural persons only.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The rights and privileges protected by the 
Constitution of the United States are the rights and privileges of 
natural persons only. An artificial entity, such as a corporation, 
limited liability company, or other for profit entity, established by 
the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign State shall 
have no rights under the Constitution and are subject to regulation by 
the People, through Federal, State, or local law. The privileges of an 
artificial entity shall be determined by the People, through Federal, 
State, or local law, and shall not be construed to be inherent or 
inalienable.
    ``Section 2. Federal, State, and local government shall regulate, 
limit, or prohibit contributions and expenditures, including a 
candidate's own contributions and expenditures, to ensure that all 
citizens, regardless of their economic status, have access to the 
political process, and that no person gains, as a result of that 
person's money, substantially more access or ability to influence in 
any way the election of any candidate for public office or any ballot 
measure. Federal, State, and local governments shall require that any 
permissible contributions and expenditures be publicly disclosed. The 
judiciary shall not construe the spending of money to influence 
elections to be speech under the First Amendment.
    ``Section 3. This amendment shall not be construed to abridge the 
privilege secured by the Constitution of the United States of the 
freedom of the press.''.
                                 <all>
```
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2012

- 1202 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2012

- NE

- 38

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

co st

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### BR700 disk life

reduction n

replacemnt 20 .0 $1,700.0

0 $ 

### 0 $1,700.00 

### 2 55 $433,500.00



### reduction of disk

life estimated cost

disk cost is

$205,000 with a

life reduction from

15k or more down

t o 14K

is a 6.6% loss $ 0.00 $13,500 $13,500.00 

### 2 55 $3,442,500.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $3,876,000



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Ana lysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### ASE Estimate

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “signi ficant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xp lain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
#### 49.108-1 Subcontractor's rights.

A subcontractor has no contractual rights against the Government upon the termination of a prime contract. A subcontractor may have rights against the prime contractor or intermediate subcontractor with whom it has contracted. Upon termination of a prime contract, the prime contractor and each subcontractor are responsible for the prompt settlement of the settlement proposals of their immediate subcontractors.
REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF:

Planning, Programs, and

Project Management

Environmental Planning

and Compliance Branch

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

P. O. BOX 60267

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70160-0267

JUN 04 2009

NOTICE OF AVAILABlLITY

A final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Mississippi River - Gulf Outlet

(MRGO) - Lake Borgne Wetland Creation and Shoreline Protection, Louisiana, project prepared

by the US Anny Corps ofEngineers, New Orleans District available for review. There are no

substantive changes between the draft and final EIS. The Selected Plan would construct

shoreline protection features along the Lake Borgne shoreline and restore and nourish wetlands

in the MRGO and Lake Borgne estuarine complex. The Selected Plan, with a total estimated

cost of $62,400,000, would initially create, nourish, and protect a total of 3,867 acres of

wetlands.

A copy oftile final EIS is available upon request. Please contact Dr. William P. Klein Ir.;

US Anny Corps of Engineers; Planning, Programs, and Project Management Division;

Environmental Planning and Compliance Branch; CEMVN-PM-RS; P.O. Box 60267; New

Orleans, Louisiana 70160-0267. Dr. Klein may also be contacted at (504) 862-2540, bye-mail to

mrgobkstab@usace.army.mil, or by fax to (504) 862-2088.

Richard

tl4~ E. Boe

Acting Chief, Environmental Planning

and Compliance Branch
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

Jesse Hartle400 Maryland Avenue, SWPCP, Room 5044Washington, DC 20202Phone: 202-245-6415FAX: 202-245-7591Email: jesse.hartle@ed.gov

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 309.406-3 Procedures.

Refer all matters appropriate for consideration by an agency Suspension and Debarment Official as soon as practicable to the appropriate Suspension and Debarment Official identified in 309.403. Any person may refer a matter to the Suspension and Debarment Official.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11357]

      ( print page 9568)    
In consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I hereby revoke the designation of Ansarallah, and its aliases, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant to Section 219 (a)(6)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(6)(A)).

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1189.

Dated: February 11, 2021.

Anthony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-03191 Filed 2-12-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### 31.601 Purpose.

This subpart provides the principles for determining allowable cost of contracts and subcontracts with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Leroy Durham.

Motion for a change of venue denied. See decision in *People*v. *Trudeau,*motion for change of venue denied (16 A D 2d 887).
#### Gladys S. Klein et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent. Charles Klein et al., *570Respondents-Appellants, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

*569(Claim No. 37550.)

*570(Claim No. 37551.)

Appeals by the State and cross appeals by claimants from judgments of the Court of Claims which awarded damages for the appropriation, for highway purposes, of lands on both sides of Route 9, which bisects the parcel owned by claimants Klein and Soper and extends along the easterly line of the contiguous parcel owned by claimants Klein and Klein. One appropriated parcel is approximately 20 feet wide and about 1,576 feet long and the other is approximately 30, feet wide and about 1,240 feet long. There were various small structures as well as wire fencing and large trees upon the property appropriated. There was taken, in addition, a permanent easement for protecting sight distances, applicable to a parcel of 3,165 square feet. Treating the appropriations as an entirety, the Court of Claims found the direct and consequential damage to be $8,500, and awarded $7,300 thereof for the Klein and Soper taking and $1,200 for the Klein and Klein taking. A major element of the damage to this rural residential property with its modest improvements was the effect of the appropriation upon the water supply delivered through a pipe running under the highway from a spring easterly of the highway to the house and outbuildings westerly thereof. Upon this appeal, the parties agree that the trial court erred in holding, first, that the appropriation did not affect claimants’ right to maintain the pipeline under the highway and, second, that in order to extinguish such right the State would have to make a specific appropriation thereof; and the parties agree, further, that the water supply (as well as a water easement in the case of the Klein-Klein parcel) was cut off by the State’s taking, which was of the fee, unlike the taking in *Town of Amherst*v. *Tide Water Oil Sales Corp.*(241 App. Div. 912), upon which the trial court mistakenly relied. (See Highway Law, § 52.) Claimants contend that they should have an additional award for the damage attributable to the loss of their water supply, but the State asserts that the award was excessive for the direct and consequential damage for which it was intended as compensation and was ample to include additional and adequate damage for loss of the water supply. The award would have to be found excessive for the items of damage comprehended by the trial court’s decision, which gave no effect to the loss of water supply; but we find it inadequate compensation for the damages actually pi-oven, when those arising from severance of the water-supply are included, as they must be. Award for claim No. 37550 increased to $8,600 and interest and that for claim No. 37551 to $1,450 and interest, and judgments modified accordingly and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to claimants-appellants. Settle order. Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 186 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 186

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Trade 
            Commission entitled ``Non-Compete Clause Rule''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2024

Mr. Palmer submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Trade 
            Commission entitled ``Non-Compete Clause Rule''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Trade Commission entitled ``Non-Compete 
Clause Rule'' (89 Fed. Reg. 38342; published May 7, 2024), and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019089EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/12 |

---

Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

(2019/C 89/06)

I.   Name of the EGTC, address and contact point

Official name: Eurodistrict PAMINA (PAMINA Eurodistrict)

Registered office:

2, Rue du Général Mittelhauser, 67630 Lauterbourg, France

Contact: Patrice Harster, Director-General for Services

Email: patrice.harster@bas-rhin.fr

Grouping website: www.eurometropolis.eu

II.   New members

Official name: Communauté de Communes du Pays rhénan (Community of Municipalities of the Pays rhénans)

Address:

32, Rue du Général de Gaulle, 67410 Drusenheim

Website: www.cc-paysrhenan.fr

Country: France

Official name: Communauté de Communes du Pays de Wissembourg (Community of Municipalities of Wissembourg)

Address:

4, Quai du 24 Novembre — BP 80023, 67161 Wissembourg Cedex

Website: www.cc-pays-wissembourg.fr

Country: France

Official name: Communauté de communes de l’Outre Forêt (Community of Municipalities of the Outre Forêt)

Address:

4, Rue de l’Ecole, 67250 Hohwiller

Website: www.cc-outreforet.fr

Country: France

Official name: Communauté de Communes Sauer-Pechelbronn (Community of Municipalities of Sauer-Pechelbronn)

Address:

1, Rue Obermatt, 67360 Durrenbach

Website: www.sauer-pechelbronn.fr

Country: France

---
EXHIBIT 32



          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), Dorrit J. Bern, Chairman of
the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer and Eric M. Specter, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Charming Shoppes, Inc. (the
"Company"), each certifies with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 (the "Report") that, to the
best of her/his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   December 4, 2003

                                           /S/ Dorrit J. Bern
                                           ------------------
                                           Dorrit J. Bern
                                           Chairman of the Board
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   December 4, 2003

                                           /S/ Eric M. Specter
                                           -------------------
                                           Eric M. Specter
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Charming Shoppes, Inc. and will be retained by Charming Shoppes,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
4.1004 Establishing subline items. Subline items may be used to facilitate tracking of performance, deliverables, payment, and contract funds accounting or for other management purposes. Subline items may be either deliverable or informational. The list of characteristics at 4.1003 applies to deliverable subline items, but it is not applicable to informational subline items. A line item with subline items shall contain only that information that is common to all subline items thereunder. All subline items under one line item shall be the same contract type as the line item. ( a ) *Deliverable subline items.* Deliverable subline items may be used for several related items that require separate identification. For example, instead of establishing multiple separate line items, subline items may be established for— ( 1 ) Items that are basically the same, except for minor variations such as— ( i ) Size or color;
( ii ) Accounting classification, but see also 4.1005-1(a)(4); or
( iii ) Date of delivery, destination, or period or place of performance;
( 2 ) Separately priced collateral functions that relate to the primary product, such as packaging and handling, or transportation; or
( 3 ) Items to be separately identified at the time of shipment or performance.
( b ) *Informational subline items.* ( 1 ) Informational subline items may be used by agencies for administrative purposes. This type of subline item identifies information that relates directly to the line item and is an integral part of it (*e.g.,* parts of an assembly or parts of a kit).
( 2 ) Position informational subline items within the line item description, not in the quantity or price fields.
EXHIBIT 12

AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY 
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to
Fixed Charges (in thousands except ratio data)

|                                            | Year Ended December 31, | Twelve
Months
Ended
|------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | -------------------
|
|Earnings:                                   |                         |                    
|Net Income Before Extraordinary Item and    |                        
|Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change      |                         | $161,511           
|Plus Federal Income Taxes                   |                         | 126,738            
|Plus State Income Taxes                     |                         | --                 
|Plus Provision for Deferred Income Taxes    |                         | (8,328             
|Plus Deferred Investment Tax Credits        |                         | (3,858             
|Plus Fixed Charges                          |                         | 124,807            
|                                            |                         |                    
|Total Earnings                              |                         | $400,870           
|                                            |                         |                    
|Fixed Charges:                              |                        
|Interest on Long-term Debt                  |                         | $93,301            
|Interest on Short-term Debt                 |                         | 19,506             
|Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities |                         | 12,000             
|Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals |                         | --                 
|                                            |                         |                    
|Fixed Charges                               |                         | $124,807           
|                                            |                         |                    
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          |                         | 3.21               
|                                            |                         |                    

* Certain amounts have been
reclassified between interest on short-term and long-term debt compared to periods prior
to January 1, 2002. This reclassification had no affect on the ratio.