alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019239EN.01000201.xml

| 16.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 July 2019

(2019/C 239/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1269 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4669 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89873 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5563 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1071 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6223 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,569 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 325,66 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2622 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7333 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,4258 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6023 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4684 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8201 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6751 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5283 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 329,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,6215 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7484 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3935 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 712,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6299 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,506 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,5998 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,816 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2100 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3466 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,2205 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1269

JPY

Japanese yen

121,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4669

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89873

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5563

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1071

ISK

Iceland króna

141,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6223

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,569

HUF

Hungarian forint

325,66

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2622

RON

Romanian leu

4,7333

TRY

Turkish lira

6,4258

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6023

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4684

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8201

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6751

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5283

KRW

South Korean won

1 329,00

ZAR

South African rand

15,6215

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7484

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3935

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 712,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6299

PHP

Philippine peso

57,506

RUB

Russian rouble

70,5998

THB

Thai baht

34,816

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2100

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3466

INR

Indian rupee

77,2205

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

+

BULLETIN 1015 PLATE 15

==

EXPLANATION

lashed wher¢

Hansen bed

Outcrop of other lignite beds,

“15%. dashed where inferred

Clinker. Dotted line shows
inferred contact with lignite
—30—
eesti lines showing thickness

Harmon lignite bed in feet

Pe)

Points where Harmon lignite bed
was measured. Numbers refer
to graphic section in pl.17.

‘ R

Abandoned lignite mine

TRUE NORTH

‘AGH

3468
x

U.S.C. and G.S. bench mark,
with elevation above sea level

STRIPPABLE LIGNITE (HARMON BED)

Overburden less than 60 feet thick

Ws

Overburden 60 to 90 feet thick

Overburden 90 to 120 feet thick

HARMON LIGNITE NOT CONSIDERED STRIPPABLE

Lignite too thin or isolated

Overburden more than 120 feet thick

SS 4
QV

SSy77~7

EMSs

RSS

ASSSOY 114

Fall
I

Lignite inferred to be weathered or partly weathered.
Short-dashed line shows inferred contact with
unweathered lignite

A

__ from General Land Office plats , r , ance aie. cmncwncc Saag pped by
wm nease R.C. Kepferle, 1952; modified in part
after C. J, Hares, 1928, pl. 14

MAP OF NORTHERN AND NORTH-CENTRAL PARTS OF BOWMAN STRIPPABLE DEPOSIT IN THE HARMON LIGNITE BED,
SLOPE COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA

0 2 Miles
L n n | i J
#### 252.225-7008 Restriction on Acquisition of Specialty Metals.

As prescribed in 225.7003-5(a)(1), use the following clause:

# Restriction on Acquisition of Specialty Metals (MAR 2013)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Alloy* means a metal consisting of a mixture of a basic metallic element and one or more metallic, or non-metallic, alloying elements.

(i) For alloys named by a single metallic element (*e.g.,* titanium alloy), it means that the alloy contains 50 percent or more of the named metal (by mass).

(ii) If two metals are specified in the name (*e.g.,* nickel-iron alloy), those metals are the two predominant elements in the alloy, and together they constitute 50 percent or more of the alloy (by mass).

*Produce* means—

(i) Atomization;

(ii) Sputtering; or

(iii) Final consolidation of non-melt derived metal powders.

*Specialty metal* means—

(i) Steel—

(A) With a maximum alloy content exceeding one or more of the following limits: Manganese, 1.65 percent; silicon, 0.60 percent; or copper, 0.60 percent; or

(B) Containing more than 0.25 percent of any of the following elements: Aluminum, chromium, cobalt, molybdenum, nickel, niobium (columbium), titanium, tungsten, or vanadium;

(ii) Metal alloys consisting of—

(A) Nickel or iron-nickel alloys that contain a total of alloying metals other than nickel and iron in excess of 10 percent; or

(B) Cobalt alloys that contain a total of alloying metals other than cobalt and iron in excess of 10 percent;

(iii) Titanium and titanium alloys; or

(iv) Zirconium and zirconium alloys.

*Steel* means an iron alloy that includes between .02 and 2 percent carbon and may include other elements.

(b) Any specialty metal delivered under this contract shall be melted or produced in the United States or its outlying areas.

(End of clause)

[74 FR 37639, July 29, 2009, as amended at 78 FR 18879, Mar. 28, 2013]
#### 47.403 Guidelines for implementation of the Fly America Act.

This section 47.403 is based on the Guidelines for Implementation of the Fly America Act (case number B-138942), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States on March 31, 1981.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Families and Caregivers as Partners in School Emergency Management      

# Resource: Families and Caregivers as Partners in School Emergency Management

This fact sheet (PDF, 6 pages) provides strategies that K-12 school district administrators, teachers, and staff can use to help form partnerships and communicate with families and guardians and include them in efforts to develop, enhance, and maintain high-quality school emergency operation plans (EOPs). **Learn more**(PDF, 6 pages).
#### John Feathers et al., Appellants, v. Elizabeth McLucas et al., Defendants, and Darby Corporation, Respondent.

Motion, insofar as it seeks permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals and a stay of all proceedings to enforce the order appealed from pending determination of such *973appeal, granted, without costs, and in all other respects denied. All findings of fact made by the court below have been affirmed, except the following finding, which has been reversed: “ Here there is no evidence whatsoever of the minimal contact with the State.” The following additional facts have been found: Defendant-respondent Darby Corporation had knowledge that the instant tank was constructed for its ultimate consignee, defendant B. Brooke Matlaek, Inc., a Pennsylvania domiciliary, and was intended for use in interstate commerce; the defendant-respondent could be expected reasonably to foresee that its acts, if wrongful, might well have potential consequences in adjoining New York. The following question shall be certified to the Court of Appeals: “Was the Appellate Division correct in reversing, on the law and the facts, the order granting defendant-respondent's motion to set aside the service of the summons and complaint and to dismiss the causes of action alleged in the complaint, and denying such motion1?” Settle order on notice. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ROBERTO LAURENCE-LOPEZ, 

AKA Eber Barrosa-Alero, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72072 

Agency No. A200-150-579 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2020**

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Roberto Laurence-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro 

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for 

deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72072 

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

the agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th 

Cir. 2014). We dismiss in part and grant in part, and we remand.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Laurence-Lopez’s contentions that the IJ 

failed to conduct a full and fair hearing and that the IJ abused his discretion in 

denying Laurence-Lopez’s motion for a continuance because Laurence-Lopez

failed to raise these issues before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 

677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to 

the agency).

We do not consider the materials Laurence-Lopez references in his opening 

brief and in his letter to the court received on February 7, 2020 that are not part of 

the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963-64 (9th Cir. 1996) 

(en banc).

In denying Laurence-Lopez’s deferral of removal under CAT claim, it is 

unclear from the record whether the agency’s analysis of the risk of future torture

and state action considered that one of the individuals that committed the past 

torture Laurence-Lopez experienced was a police officer. See Madrigal v. Holder, 

716 F.3d 499, 509 (9th Cir. 2013) (remanding for agency to consider all evidence 
3 18-72072 

in assessing likelihood of torture); Cole v. Holder, 659 F.3d 762, 772 (9th Cir. 

2011) (“[W]here potentially dispositive testimony and documentary evidence is 

submitted, the BIA must give reasoned consideration to that evidence.”). Thus, we 

grant the petition for review and remand Laurence-Lopez’s CAT claim to the 

agency for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. 

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam). 

The government must bear the costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; GRANTED in part; 

REMANDED.
# Table 1_Enrollment

# Table 2_Persistence

# Table 3_Completion
#### 326.605 Contract Requirements.
Process Flow - Storage and Distribution
#### 252.219-7000 Advancing Small Business Growth.

As prescribed in 219.309(1), use the following provision:

# Advancing Small Business Growth (JUN 2023)

(a) This provision implements 10 U.S.C. 4959.

(b) The Offeror acknowledges by submission of its offer that by acceptance of the contract resulting from this solicitation, the Offeror may exceed the applicable small business size standard of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code assigned to the contract and would no longer qualify as a small business concern for that NAICS code. Small business size standards matched to industry NAICS codes are published by the Small Business Administration and are available at 13 CFR 121.201 and *https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards.* The Offeror is therefore encouraged to develop the capabilities and characteristics typically desired in contractors that are competitive as other-than-small contractors in this industry.

(c) For procurement technical assistance, the Offeror may contact the nearest APEX Accelerator. APEX Accelerator locations are available at *https://www.apexaccelerators.us.*

(End of provision)

[80 FR 30116, May 26, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 65563, Sept. 23, 2016; 87 FR 76997, Dec. 16, 2022; 88 FR 37799, June 9, 2023]
#### 434.005 General requirements.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: 2022 School Pulse Panel      

# Resource: 2022 School Pulse Panel

This survey found that 70 percent of public schools reported that the number of students who have sought mental health services increased since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey also revealed data on the ability of schools to effectively provide mental health services to students in need as well as the implementation of social and emotional health programs. This most recent release highlights findings related to absenteeism and student behavior.**Learn more.**
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Eduardo CORONADO-OLEA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50750

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eduardo Coronado-Olea raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
401.370 Exclusions. Subject to the policies of FAR subpart 1.3, certain USDA acquisition policies and procedures may be excluded from the AGAR under appropriately justified circumstances, such as: ( a ) Subject matter which is effective for a period less than 12 months.
( b ) Subject matter which is instituted on an experimental basis for a reasonable period.
( c ) Acquisition procedures instituted on an interim basis to comply with the requirements of statute, regulation, Executive Order, OMB Circular, or OFPP Policy Letter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 25, 2021.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta*                     (Kathryn Haney, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Jeremy Francis Gilpin, South Lake Tahoe, California, and Jeffrey Alan Smith, Atlanta, Georgia;*                     as a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of Community Bankshares, Inc., LaGrange, Georgia and its subsidiaries, Community Bank and Trust—West Georgia, also of LaGrange, Georgia, and Community Bank and Trust—Alabama, Union Springs, Alabama.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 5, 2021.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-02765 Filed 2-9-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2019431EN.01001101.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 December 2019

(2019/C 431/10)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1097 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4720 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85133 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4340 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0883 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9463 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,445 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 330,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2593 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7705 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5774 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6088 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4579 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6511 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6811 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5036 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 286,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7936 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7764 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4390 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 510,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5942 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,284 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,9657 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,496 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5175 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0259 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,0035 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1097

JPY

Japanese yen

121,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4720

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85133

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4340

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0883

ISK

Iceland króna

136,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9463

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,445

HUF

Hungarian forint

330,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2593

RON

Romanian leu

4,7705

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5774

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6088

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4579

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6511

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6811

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5036

KRW

South Korean won

1 286,58

ZAR

South African rand

15,7936

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7764

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4390

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 510,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5942

PHP

Philippine peso

56,284

RUB

Russian rouble

68,9657

THB

Thai baht

33,496

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5175

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0259

INR

Indian rupee

79,0035

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---