alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Communications and Outreach Home |
|                                            |

Detailed information for Program guidelines, criteria and digital downloads information is available at https://www2.ed.gov/programs/presedaward/faq.html.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 252.237-7025 Preaward Transparency Requirements for Firms Offering to Support Department of Defense Audits—Representation and Disclosure.

As prescribed in 237.270(e)(3), use the following provision:

# Preaward Transparency Requirements For Firms Offering To Support Department of Defense Audits—Representation and Disclosure (OCT 2022)

(a) *Representation.* The Offeror represents that within the 3-year period preceding this offer, the Offeror and/or any of its principals or employees have [ ] have not [ ] been the subject of disciplinary proceedings before an entity with the authority to enforce compliance with rules or laws applying to audit services or audit remediation services offered by the Offeror, that—

(1) Are not yet fully adjudicated or settled; or

(2) Were fully adjudicated or settled against the Offeror and/or its principals or employees.

(b) *Disclosure.* If the Offeror checked “have” in the representation in paragraph (a) of this provision, the Offeror shall, at a minimum, disclose for each such proceeding—

(1) The entity hearing the case;

(2) The case or file number; and

(3) The allegation or conduct at issue and, if fully adjudicated or settled, a brief description of the outcome.

(c) *Treatment of the statements.* The Government will safeguard and treat as confidential all statements provided pursuant to this provision where the statement has been marked “confidential” or “proprietary” by the Offeror. Statements so marked will not be released by the Government to the public pursuant to a request under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, without prior notification to the Offeror and opportunity for the Offeror to claim an exemption from release. The Government will treat any statement provided pursuant to this provision as confidential to the extent required by any other applicable law.

(End of provision)

[87 FR 65501, Oct. 28, 2022]
#### 452.211-72 Statement of Work/Specifications.

As prescribed in 411.171, insert the following clause:

# Statement of Work/Specifications (FEB 1988)

The Contractor shall furnish the necessary personnel, material, equipment, services and facilities (except as otherwise specified), to perform the Statement of Work/Specifications referenced in Section J.

(End of clause)

[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996. Redesignated at 63 FR 26996, May 15, 1998.]
# C_2021201EN.01000901.xml

| 28.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 May 2021

(2021/C 201/08)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2198 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4363 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86068 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1298 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0967 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 146,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1953 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,439 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 348,54 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4837 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9161 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,2986 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5753 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4746 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4680 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6720 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6146 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 362,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7647 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7808 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5170 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 449,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0500 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,575 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 89,5360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,180 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4683 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,2556 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,5630 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2198

JPY

Japanese yen

133,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4363

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86068

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1298

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0967

ISK

Iceland króna

146,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1953

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,439

HUF

Hungarian forint

348,54

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4837

RON

Romanian leu

4,9161

TRY

Turkish lira

10,2986

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5753

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4746

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4680

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6720

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6146

KRW

South Korean won

1 362,64

ZAR

South African rand

16,7647

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7808

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5170

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 449,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0500

PHP

Philippine peso

58,575

RUB

Russian rouble

89,5360

THB

Thai baht

38,180

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4683

MXN

Mexican peso

24,2556

INR

Indian rupee

88,5630

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 404.7001 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 452.204-70, Inquiries, in all solicitations.
#### 45.604-1 Sales procedures.

Surplus personal property that has completed screening in accordance with 45.602-3(a) shall be sold in accordance with the policy for the sale of surplus personal property contained in the Federal Management Regulation, at part 102-38 (41 CFR part 102-38). Agencies may specify implementing procedures.

[77 FR 12943, Mar. 2, 2012]
#### 252.247-7004--252.247-7006 [Reserved]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A1 71 5 . W I LLI E CLARENCE MAYS v . THE STATE.

In Oct o b er 20 1 5

, W i l l i e M ay s pl ed g u il t y t o t heft b y t a k i n g

. L a t er, in

Decem b er 20 1 6

, May s fi l ed a “ M o t i o n to Set As i d e V o i d J u d g m en t ” ch al l en g i n g t h e

warran t affi d av i t t h at l ed t o h i s arres t . Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t io n

, an d M ay s

fi led th i s d i rect ap p eal . W e, h owev er, l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n

.

As t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ex p la i n e d

, a p o st -co nv i ct i o n m o t i o n to vacat e an

al l eg ed l y v o i d co n v i ct i o n i s no t an ap p ro p ri at e rem ed y i n a cri m in al cas e. See Ro b er t s

v. S t a t e

, 2 8 6 Ga. 5 32

, 5 3 2 (6 9 0 SE2 d 1 5 0 ) (2 0 1 0 ); Ha r per v. St a t e

, 2 8 6 Ga. 21 6

, 2 1 8

(1 ) (6 8 6 SE2 d 7 86 ) (2 0 0 9 ). 1 An y ap p eal fro m an o rd er d en y in g o r di s m i s s i n g s u ch a

m o ti o n m u s t b e d i s m i s sed

. See Ro b er t s

, 2 8 6 Ga. at 5 3 2 ; Ha r

p er

, 2 8 6 Ga. at 2 1 8 (2 ).

1 Th e Co u rt h as al s o ex p l ai n ed t h at a cri m i n al d efen d an t s eek in g to ch al l en g e

a co n v i ct i o n aft er i t h as b een affi rm ed o n d i rect ap p eal m ay “ fi l e an ex t r a o r d i n ary

m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al

, O CGA § 5 -5 -4 1

, a m o t i o n i n arres t o f j u d gm en t

, OCGA § 1 7 -9

- 6 1

, o r a p et i t i o n fo r h ab eas co rp u s , OCGA § 9 -1 4 -4 0.” Ha r p er , 2 86 Ga. at 2 1 7 (1 ). June 07, 2018Becau s e M ay s ’ s m o t i o n t o s et as i d e i s n o t a v al i d rem ed y

, t hi s ap peal fro m t h e

t ri al co u rt ’ s d en ial o f t hat m o t i o n i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 06/07/2018
Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

# Panel Review by Applicant

## Illinois

Bottom of Form

# _1479585363.unknown
42.502 Selecting contracts for postaward orientation. When deciding whether postaward orientation is necessary and, if so, what form it shall take, the contracting officer shall consider, as a minimum, the— ( a ) Nature and extent of the preaward survey and any other prior discussions with the contractor;
( b ) Type, value, and complexity of the contract;
( c ) Complexity and acquisition history of the product or service;
( d ) Requirements for spare parts and related equipment;
( e ) Urgency of the delivery schedule and relationship of the product or service to critical programs;
( f ) Length of the planned production cycle;
( g ) Extent of subcontracting;
( h ) Contractor's performance history and experience with the product or service;
( i ) Contractor's status, if any, as a small business, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, or service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern;
( j ) Contractor's performance history with small, small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business subcontracting programs;
( k ) Safety precautions required for hazardous materials or operations; and
( l ) Complex financing arrangements, such as progress payments, advance payments, or guaranteed loans.
[48 FR 42370, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 48264, Sept. 18, 1995; 70 FR 14955, Mar. 23, 2005]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Children In Disasters Emergency Kit Checklists      

# Resource: Children In Disasters Emergency Kit Checklists

These checklists are designed to help families with children prepare for an emergency. Parents and other caregivers can learn which items to consider including in an emergency kit and how to turn this task into a fun game for the family. Checklists are available for families with children or pets and for families with children with special healthcare needs. **Learn more.**
Meeting Notes

Date: 2/24/2014

Time: 4:00pm

Attendees:



### EPA Headwaters

Barnes Johnson Bill Gehrmann

Betsy Smidinger Hewitt Strange

Charlotte Mooney Ken Kastner

Rich Kinch

Richard Huggins Jr.

A copy of the sign

‐ in sheet is attached.

Meeting Dialogue:

Barnes Johnson started the meeting off noting that the comment period for the CCR rulemaking is

closed.

The main points from Headwaters were:

 Thanking EPA for the work on the CCR Methodology and Application documents which were

recently released. They did, however, express concern that various parties may see the

conservative process used by EPA in the screening analysis as a “requirement”. In particular,

Headwaters mentioned the range of pH values incorporated in the LEAF test results and

provided a 2013 article by David Kosson titled “pH

‐ dependent leaching of constituents of

potential concern from concrete materials containing coal combustion fly ash (attached).

 Recommending that EPA define what is and is not large scale fill. In basic terms, they divided

the universe into 3 areas

– pits and quarries; land contouring; and structures. They are not

significantly involved in pits and quarries; recognized EPA has identified some damage cases, so

that area may be disposal. They expressed that the status of land contouring largely depended

on whether it was an engineered use. Their view is that structural fill associated with

engineered uses for building sites, road base and embankments, levees and dams (excluding

those associated with CCR impoundments), any other project meeting engineered

specifications, and any project below 10,000 cubic yards is not large scale disposal. As for what

constitutes a structural fill having appropriate engineering, Headwaters suggested the soon to

be released ASTM 2277 standard could be adopted, and they provided a draft copy (attached).

 Indicating that they would be sending EPA a letter detailing the position they articulated at the

meeting.

EPA did not request Headwaters send in any additional information, and reflecting EPA’s opening

remarks that the comment period is closed, EPA was clear that our commitment to addressing their

position is appropriately limited to the comments they provided when the comment period was open.
## Pitot Tube Calibration Data Sheet 

# ,
Calibration Date: Reference Pitot Tube: Calibrated Pitot Tube: Probe Description: A-side Calibration December 12, 2009 Performed by : Daniel Sloat Pbar(inHg) = 28.17 Standard ID No.: STD-2 5/16 in. O.D. rCp(Sld) =.0.99 S-Type Probe/Pitot ID No.: 

# 42 Configuration: Permanent MILLENIUM - Heated Effective Length: 

### 12' Condition: Good

~PSld(in. H2O)

~Ps (in. H2O)

Cp(S) a Deviationb



## - --- ---- Run 1 0.91 1.25 0.8447 0.0066 Run 2 0.91 1.28 0.847 0.0033 Run 3 0.91 1.28 0.8347 0.0033 Avg. (A) 

### 0.8381 0.0044

B-side Calibration ~P sid(in. H2O) ~Ps (in. H2O)

Cp(S) a Deviationb .- 

## -~--- Run 1 0.88 1.27 0.8241 0.0080 Run 2 0.89 1.26 0.8320 0.0000 Run 3 0.90 1.25 0.400 0.0080 Avg. (B) 

### 0.8321 0.0053 aCp(S) = (Cp(Std))("(~Psid1 ~P S)) bDeviation = Cp(S) - Cp(s)avg (must be :5 0.01) PASS Avg Cp(s)(A) - Avg Cp(s)(B) = 0.0060 (must be :5 0.01) PASS

Signed:

# ~··6~

- Date: 

# '2-jr2-lZ-=..cl I t

# , Pitot Tube Calibration Data Sheet Calibration Date: December 12, 2009 Performed by : Daniel Sloat Pbar (inHg) = 28.17 Reference Pitot Tube: Standard ID No.: STD-2 5/16 in. O.D.

. ,Cp(Sld)·:::"O.99 Calibrated Pitot Tube: S-Type Probe/Pitot ID No.: 

## 46 Configuration: Permanent Probe Description: MILLENIUM - Heated Effective Length: 

### 12' Condition: Good A-side Calibration t.PsId (in. H2O) t.Ps(in. H2O)

Cp(S) a Deviationb Run 1 0.90 1.25 0.8400 0.0006 Run 2 0.90 1.24 0.8434 0.0040 Run 3 0.91 1.28 0.8347 0.0047 Avg. (A) 

### 0.8394 0.0031

B-side Calibration t.PsId (in. H2O) t.Ps(in. H2O)

Cp(S) a Deviationb 

### ----._-- ---- Run 1 0.91 1.22 0.8550 0.0073 Run 2 0.90 1.24 0.8434 0.0043 Run 3 0.91 1.25 0.8447 0.0030 Avg. (B) 

### 0.8477 0.0049

aCp(S) = (Cp(Sld))(.y(t.P sId

/t.Ps)) bDeviation = Cp(S) - Cp(s)avg Avg Cp(s)(A) - Avg Cp(s)(B) = (must be :5 0.01) (must be :5 0.01) PASS PASS

Date: { "2.-1 

### ("2--/

# ~4
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

**Who May Apply: (specifically)** State agencies identified as the lead agency for this program may apply.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 32.610 Compromising debts.

For debts under $100,000, excluding interest, the designated agency official may compromise the debt pursuant to the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR part 902) and agency regulations. Unless specifically authorized by agency procedures, contracting officers cannot compromise debts.
Case 1:01-cv-01537-PLF Document 128 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:01-cv-01537-PLF Document 128 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 2 of 2
# C_2019409EN.01005401.xml

| 5.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/54

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2019/C 409/07)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Estonia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Estonia

Subject of commemoration: The centenary of the University of Tartu

Description of the design: The coin will mark the centenary of the University of Tartu as being established as the first Estonian language university. It was founded in 1632 by Swedish King Gustav II Adolf and is one of the oldest universities in northern and eastern Europe. In 1919 it became the first Estonian language university.

The design depicts a motif of the main building of the university. It also bears the inscriptions ‘RAHVUSÜLIKOOL 100’(National University 100) and ‘UNIVERSITAS TARTUENSIS’, the year ‘1632’, the issuing country ‘EESTI’ and the year of issuance ‘2019’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 1 000 000

Date of issue: November 2019

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
#### In the Matter of Charles J. Piluso (Admitted as Charles Joseph Piluso), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

July 2, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Edward H. Albert*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Segal & Hundley (Marvin B. Segal*and *Albert J. Ahern*of counsel), for respondent.

*557OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on June 17, 1959 under the name of Charles Joseph Piluso.

On April 26, 1974 respondent was convicted, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, of violating sections 2, 371 and 1952 of title 18 of the United States Code. He was sentenced to a period of two years’ imprisonment on each of the three counts, said sentences to run concurrently. The respondent had conspired with another to travel from Virginia to New York to pay $175,000 in bribes to a bank official to obtain loans for various Virginia real estate construction projects.

Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in this State upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted and the respondent’s motion is denied. The clerk of this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.