18442 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

national security. Disclosure of the 

accounting would also permit the individual 

who is the subject of a record to impede the 

investigation, to tamper with witnesses or 

evidence, and to avoid detection or 

apprehension, which would undermine the 

entire investigative process. 

(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) 

because access to the records contained in 

this system of records could inform the 

subject of an investigation of an actual or 

potential criminal, civil, or regulatory 

violation to the existence of that investigation 

and reveal investigative interest on the part 

of DHS or another agency. Access to the 

records could permit the individual who is 

the subject of a record to impede the 

investigation, to tamper with witnesses or 

evidence, and to avoid detection or 

apprehension. Amendment of the records 

could interfere with ongoing investigations 

and law enforcement activities and would 

impose an unreasonable administrative 

burden by requiring investigations to be 

continually reinvestigated. In addition, 

permitting access and amendment to such 

information could disclose security-sensitive 

information that could be detrimental to 

homeland security. 

(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and 

Necessity of Information) because in the 

course of investigations into potential 

violations of federal law, the accuracy of 

information obtained or introduced 

occasionally may be unclear, or the 

information may not be strictly relevant or 

necessary to a specific investigation. In the 

interests of effective law enforcement, it is 

appropriate to retain all information that may 

aid in establishing patterns of unlawful 

activity. 

(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of 

Information from Individuals) because 

requiring that information be collected from 

the subject of an investigation would alert the 

subject to the nature or existence of the 

investigation, thereby interfering with that 

investigation and related law enforcement 

activities. 

(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to 

Subjects) because providing such detailed 

information could impede law enforcement 

by compromising the existence of a 

confidential investigation or reveal the 

identity of witnesses or confidential 

informants. 

(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), 

and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f) 

(Agency Rules), because portions of this 

system are exempt from the individual access 

provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons 

noted above, and therefore DHS is not 

required to establish requirements, rules, or 

procedures with respect to such access. 

Providing notice to individuals with respect 

to existence of records pertaining to them in 

the system of records or otherwise setting up 

procedures pursuant to which individuals 

may access and view records pertaining to 

themselves in the system would undermine 

investigative efforts and reveal the identities 

of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and 

confidential informants. 

(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of 

Information) because with the collection of 

information for law enforcement purposes, it 

is impossible to determine in advance what 

information is accurate, relevant, timely, and 

complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5) 

would preclude DHS agents from using their 

investigative training and exercise of good 

judgment to both conduct and report on 

investigations. 

(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on 

Individuals) because compliance would 

interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve, 

and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law 

enforcement mechanisms that may be filed 

under seal and could result in disclosure of 

investigative techniques, procedures, and 

evidence. 

(i) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies) 

to the extent that the system is exempt from 

other specific subsections of the Privacy Act. 

Dated: March 6, 2014. 

Karen L. Neuman, 

Chief Privacy Officer, Department of 

Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 2014–07386 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–28–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0731; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–ASO–18] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace; 

Blairsville, GA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class 

E Airspace at Blairsville, GA, to 

accommodate a new Area Navigation 

(RNAV) Global Positioning System 

(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedure (SIAP) serving Blairsville 

Airport. This action enhances the safety 

and management of Instrument Flight 

Rules (IFR) operations at the airport. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, May 27, 

2014. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On February 12, 2014, the FAA 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of proposed rulemaking to 

establish Class E airspace at Blairsville, 

GA (79 FR 8365) Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0731. Interested parties were 

invited to participate in this rulemaking 

effort by submitting written comments 

on the proposal to the FAA. No 

comments were received. Class E 

airspace designations are published in 

paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9X 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The Rule 

This amendment to Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 

establishes Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

within a 16-mile radius of Blairsville 

Airport, Blairsville, GA, providing the 

controlled airspace required to 

accommodate the new RNAV (GPS) 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures developed for the airport. 

This action provides for the safety and 

management of IFR operations at the 

airport. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 18443 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it establishes 

controlled airspace at Blairsville 

Airport, Blairsville, GA. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ 

paragraph 311a. This airspace action is 

not expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 7, 2013, effective 

September 15, 2013, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth 

* * * * * 

ASO GA E5 Blairsville, GA [New] 

Blairsville Airport, GA 

(Lat. 34°51′16′′ N., long. 83°59′50′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 16-mile radius 

of Blairsville Airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on March 

25, 2014. 

Eric Fox, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2014–07292 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

14 CFR Part 1201 

[Document No.: NASA–2014–0004] 

RIN 2700–AD88 

Statement of Organization and General 

Information 

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: This direct final rule makes 

nonsubstantive changes by removing 

language related to general information 

on NASA’s organizations because the 

most current information is maintained 

in other regulations and on NASA’s 

Organization Structure Web site. 

Therefore, this regulation will be 

streamlined to make reference to those 

locations to ensure that the public is 

provided with the most current 

information accessible on NASA. The 

revisions to this rule is part of NASA’s 

retrospective plan under EO 13563 

completed in August 2011. NASA’s full 

plan can be accessed on the Agency’s 

open government Web site at http://

www.nasa.gov/open/. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

on June 2, 2014. Comments due on or 

before May 2, 2014. If adverse 

comments are received, NASA will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the rule 

in the Federal Register. 

ADDRESSES: Comments must be 

identified with RINs 2700–AD88 and 

may be sent to NASA via the Federal ERulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Please note that NASA will post all 

comments on the Internet with changes, 

including any personal information 

provided. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dorothy Frederick, 202–358–1188. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Direct Final Rule and Significant 

Adverse Comments 

NASA has determined this 

rulemaking meets the criteria for a 

direct final rule because it involves 

clarifications, updating, and 

nonsubstantive changes to existing 

regulations. NASA does not anticipate 

this direct final rule will result in major 

changes to its organizational structure. 

However, if NASA receives significant 

adverse comments, NASA will 

withdraw this final rule by publishing a 

note in the Federal Register in order to 

revisit the commented-on language. In 

determining whether a comment 

necessitates withdrawal of this final 

rule, NASA will consider whether it 

warrants a substantive response in a 

notice and comment process. 

Background 

NASA will update appropriate 

sections of this rule in order to provide 

information that is as current as possible 

and to provide Internet addresses that 

will provide the public with current, 

relevant data at any given time. These 

changes will ensure that NASA is in 

compliance with 5 U.S.C. 552 (a)(1) (A), 

Public information, agency rules, 

opinions, orders, records, and 

proceedings, as follows: 

(a) Each agency shall make available 

to the public information as follows: 

(1) Each agency shall separately state 

and currently publish in the Federal 

Register for the guidance of the public— 

(A) descriptions of its central and 

field organization and the established 

places at which, the employees (and in 

the case of a uniformed service, the 

members) from whom, and the methods 

whereby, the public may obtain 

information, make submittals or 

requests, or obtain decisions. 

Statutory Authority 

5 U.S.C. 552 (a)(1) (A). 

Regulatory Analysis 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 

Regulation Review 

Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, of 

reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, 

and of promoting flexibility. This rule 

has been designated as ‘‘not significant’’ 

under section 3(f) of Executive Order 

12866. 

Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to 

prepare an initial regulatory flexibility 

analysis to be published at the time the 

proposed rule is published. This 

requirement does not apply if the 

agency ‘‘certifies that the rule will not, 

if promulgated, have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES