alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 52.216-12 Cost-Sharing Contract—No Fee.

As prescribed in 16.307(f), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a cost-sharing contract is contemplated. This clause may be modified by substituting *$10,000* in lieu of *$100,000* as the maximum reserve in paragraph (b) if the contract is with a nonprofit organization.

# Cost-Sharing Contract—No Fee (APR 1984)

(a) The Government shall not pay to the Contractor a fee for performing this contract.

(b) After paying 80 percent of the Government's share of the total estimated cost of performance shown in the Schedule, the Contracting Officer may withhold further payment of allowable cost until a reserve is set aside in an amount that the Contracting Officer considers necessary to protect the Government's interest. This reserve shall not exceed one percent of the Government's share of the total estimated cost shown in the Schedule or $100,000, whichever is less.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (APR 1984). In a contract for research and development with an educational institution, for which the contracting officer has determined that withholding of a portion of allowable cost is not required, delete paragraph (b) of the basic clause.

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 72 FR 27389, May 15, 2007]
#### 423.601 Requirements.

The HCA shall establish a system of instructions to identify the installation/facility radiation protection officer.
3403.301 General. ( b ) Any Departmental personnel who have evidence of a suspected antitrust violation in an acquisition must— ( 1 ) Report that evidence through the HCA to the Office of the General Counsel for referral to the Attorney General; and
( 2 ) Provide a copy of that evidence to the SPE.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 121 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 121

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Credit Card Penalty Fees (Regulation 
                                 Z)''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2024

Mr. Ogles submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Credit Card Penalty Fees (Regulation 
                                 Z)''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Credit Card Penalty Fees (Regulation Z)'' (89 Fed. Reg. 19128; 
published March 15, 2024), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Coopers  Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.     639 Loyola Avenue telephone (504) 529-2700

         a professional services firm Suite 1800        facsmile  (504) 529-1439
& Lybrand                             New Orleans, LA   70113



August 12, 1997

Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.   20549

         Re:   Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. Registrations
               On Form S-8 (Nos. 2-79671, 33-10169, 33-38362 and 33-44663)
               and Form S-3 (Nos. 33-24895, 33-62950 and 333-02895)

We are aware that our report dated July 25, 1997 on our review of the interim
financial information of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. as of
June 30, 1997 and for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1997
and 1996 included in this Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference in the above
mentioned registration statements. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities
Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of the registration
statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11
of that Act.



Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.




Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., a registered limited liability partnership, is member
of Coopers & Lybrand international.
Skip Links

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

## SYE Tool Program

| SYE Tool Program Files
The following are presented as downloadable WinZip files:masye_files.zip (13.5 Megabytes) archydro.zip (2.22 Gigabytes) 

The archydro.zip is a very large file. If you need this file on a DVD, please contact the Massachusetts Water Science Center.

Return to main page. | Posted June 2010
**For additional information contact:**Director          Massachusetts Water Science Center          U.S. Geological Survey          10 Bearfoot Road, Northborough, MA 01532          (508)490-5000http://ma.water.usgs.gov

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
RegulatoryEvaluationDocketNo.FAA-,;JfB</DirectorateIdentifier:.AD;'/£715-v£-,;?;-4;:;Addtheworkhours,partscost,m1dnumberofU.S.registeredproductstothetablebelow.Whenyouarefinished,clickonthe"UpdateFields"buttontoautomaticallyfillinthetotals.Action(e.g.,Inspection,replacement)Donotincludeonconditioncostshere1andfrrstrepetitive(IAction(e.g.,Inspection,replacement).UpdatefieldsIt(e.g.,:,engine,P<rrtsco,taccess,'2S[70.UO:;U.Oi•I)U.ouI'U.OC•I·•r:"''I·Iu""I,"·'''I'"'..I,"'''(Laborco't(includeaccess,(@$85/hour)testing,:)dclose-'·,·,:·7TotalCo'"(labor+pam)IsuocI.I...'I',_.,,I'...,I•.',,.,'....'....I·....I,...·I•.,,.:.'I•u.s.Registered4sineforU.S.fleet:Partsco,tforU.S.FleetIs"·',,,I.,,,''''5I•.Uc•::0.00In.ll·I'D.>'UI',,.·.'I:.;••,,I",·,Number$680**'~** ()_()i; Special considerations

for Economic Analysis

(Use

this field

to explain anything

in the **Estima~ed**

Costs

table that

was assumed

or might

not

be obvious.

This field

can also

be used

to explain warranty

costs): Executive

Order

12866: Could

the

AD

be considered

a "significant

regulatory action"?.

YES'

D **NOll<~** *Explanation: DOT Regulatory

Policies

and Procedures: Is the

AD significant?

**~**

YES'

D N00 *Explanation: Regulatory

Flexibility

Act: Will

the

AD have

a significant

economic

impact

on

a substantial

number

of small entities?

Explain

for either

a Yes

or No answer

.•

YESD

**NOll<~** Explanation: Intrastate

Aviation

in Alaska: This

AD could

affect intrastate

aviation

in Alaska.

Is

it appropriate

to include

specific requirements

for aircraft operated

in Alaska

where aviation

might

be the only mode

of transportation?

- YES'

D NO

0 *Explanation:

8
# C_2018248EN.01000201.xml

| 16.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 July 2018

(2018/C 248/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1643 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4555 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88488 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3760 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1704 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 125,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,924 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3210 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6578 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,6467 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5764 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5358 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1387 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7280 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5919 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 319,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5187 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8012 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3963 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 787,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7106 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,291 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,4844 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,841 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5373 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1768 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,7320 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1643

JPY

Japanese yen

131,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4555

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88488

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3760

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1704

ISK

Iceland króna

125,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,924

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3210

RON

Romanian leu

4,6578

TRY

Turkish lira

5,6467

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5764

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5358

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1387

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7280

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5919

KRW

South Korean won

1 319,70

ZAR

South African rand

15,5187

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8012

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3963

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 787,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7106

PHP

Philippine peso

62,291

RUB

Russian rouble

72,4844

THB

Thai baht

38,841

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5373

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1768

INR

Indian rupee

79,7320

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
exv10w11






Exhibit 10.11




CA, Inc.

Summary of Compensation of Interim Executive Chairman



On September 3, 2009, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of
CA, Inc. (the “Company”), approved the following compensation for William E. McCracken for his
service as Interim Executive Chairman, in lieu of his compensation as a non-employee director and
non-executive Chairman of the Board:





	 	1.	 	A cash salary of $1,000,000, to be paid on an annualized basis concurrently with the
Company’s normal payroll cycle during his tenure as Interim Executive Chairman up until
his termination from the role as Interim Executive Chairman, at which time the Company
will pay Mr. McCracken the unpaid portion of his cash salary in a lump sum payment to be
paid on the earlier of his termination from the role as Interim Executive Chairman or
March 15, 2010;
	 
	 	2.	 	A grant of options to purchase 72,323 shares of common stock of the Company at an
exercise price of $20.87 per share, the fair market value of a share of common stock of
the Company as of September 3, 2009 (the “Grant Date”). The options were fully vested
upon grant and will become exercisable twenty percent (20%) on each anniversary of the
Grant Date and have a term of six (6) years; and
	 
	 	3.	 	A grant of 23,957 restricted stock units, which shall vest twenty percent (20%) each
year on the anniversary of the Grant Date, provided, however, that vested portion of the
Restricted Stock Unit will not be paid or delivered until one (1) year after the
Restricted Stock Unit Award is 100% vested (i.e., six (6) years from the Grant Date).
#### Nat Tepper, Plaintiff, v Samuel Tannenbaum et al., Defendants.

Motion for leave to reargue or to appeal is denied, without costs. Since the order sought to be appealed directed a new trial, an appeal to the Court of Appeals may only be taken as of right by stipulating for judgment absolute (CPLR 5601, subd [c]; *New York Cent & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co. v State of New York,*166 NY 286; *United Nat. Bank v Ettinger,*60 AD2d 670; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5602.09, pp 56-72). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Markewich, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Bullying Prevention Strategies and Resources for K-12 Schools      

# Resource: Bullying Prevention Strategies and Resources for K-12 Schools

This resource (PDF, 3 pages) defines bullying and offers bullying prevention strategies that school leaders, teachers, and staff can implement to help identify, address, and prevent bullying in schools. Additional resources are provided. **Learn more** (PDF, 3 pages).
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

A:
Is Hansen bed

“ Zz
wr:

Ne
a eee

Ve 7h
NIL
Tp all

iL

Base from General Land Office plats

MAP OF SOUTHERN AND SOUTH-CENTRAL PARTS OF BOWMAN STRIPPABLE DEPOSIT IN THE HARMON LIGNITE BED,

SLOPE AND BOWMAN COUNTIES, NORTH DAKOTA

bo

2 Miles

BULLETIN 1015 PLATE 16

EXPLANATION

Outcrop of Harmon lignite bed,
dashed where inferred
Hansen bed

Outcrop of other lignite beds,
dashed where inferred

Clinker. Dotted line shows
inferred contact with lignite
—————

ich lines showing thickness
of Harmon lignite bed in feet

oo

Points where Harmon lignite bed
was measured. Numbers refer
to graphic section in pl.18

R
Abandoned lignite mine

3033
x

U.S. C. and G.S. bench mark,
with elevation above sea level

STRIPPABLE LIGNITE (HARMON BED)

Overburden less than 60 feet thick

Overburden 60 to 90 feet thick

Overburden 90 to 120 feet thick

HARMON LIGNITE NOT CONSIDERED STRIPPABLE

Overburden more than 120 feet thick

Lignite inferred to be weathered or partly weathered,
Short-dashed line shows inferred contact with
unweathered lignite

Lignite mined out

INTERIOR~GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. WASHINGTON, D.C.
M R-6438

SASS
SSSS
VV’:

Geology mapped by W. C. Culbertson and
R.C. Kepferle, 1952; modified in part
after C. J. Hares, 1928,pl. 14
Martha Guadalajara, 

Individually and as 

representative of the Estate of 

a

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 15, 2013

No. 04-13-00525-CV

PAM TRANSPORT INC., Victor Soza, Pam Cartage Carriers, LLC f/k/a Pam Dedicated 

Services, Inc., Pam Transportation Services, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Martha GUADALAJARA, Individually and as representative of the Estate of Roberto 

Guadalajara-Garza and as next friend of Roberto Ivan Guadalajara, Edgardo Guadalajara Isual 

Guadalajara, Kimberly Guadalajara, et al,

Appellees

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-06-25301-MCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants seek to appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion to compel 

arbitration. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. 51.016 (West Supp. 2012) (providing that in 

a matter subject to the Federal Arbitration Act, a person may take an appeal from an 

interlocutory order under the same circumstances that an appeal from a federal court’s order 

would be permitted). On August 6, 2013, appellants filed a motion to stay all trial court 

proceedings, including discovery and motion practice, until this appeal is resolved. On August 

13, 2013, appellees filed a response to appellants’ motion to stay all trial court proceedings. This 

response also contains a request that this appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

While an appeal from an interlocutory order is pending, the trial court retains jurisdiction 

over the case and, unless prohibited by statute, may make further orders. TEX. R. APP. P. 29.5. If 

permitted by law, the trial court may even proceed with a trial on the merits. Id. However, the 

trial court must not make an order that interferes with or impairs the jurisdiction of the appellate 

court, or the effectiveness of any relief sought or that may be granted on appeal. Id.

In their notice of appeal, appellants claim they are entitled to an appeal of the trial court’s 

interlocutory order based on section 51.016 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. This 

statute, however, does not expressly require a stay of the trial court proceedings during the 
pendency of an appeal from an interlocutory order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.

51.016. Moreover, nothing indicates the appellants asked the trial court to stay its proceedings 

before asking this court to stay the trial court’s proceedings. See id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 29.2 

(providing that the trial court may permit an order granting interlocutory relief to be superseded 

and, if the trial court refuses, the appellate court may review the decision for an abuse of 

discretion).

Appellants’ motion to stay all trial court proceedings is therefore DENIED. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ request to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is 

CARRIED WITH THIS APPEAL. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of August, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2019364EN.01000301.xml

| 29.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 October 2019

(2019/C 364/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1087 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4707 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86328 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7503 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1047 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2105 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,480 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 328,16 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2715 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7559 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3479 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6245 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4487 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6923 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7482 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5104 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 297,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1202 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8366 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4543 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 536,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6410 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,731 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,5328 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,488 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4158 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,1244 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,4355 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1087

JPY

Japanese yen

120,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4707

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86328

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7503

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1047

ISK

Iceland króna

138,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2105

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,480

HUF

Hungarian forint

328,16

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2715

RON

Romanian leu

4,7559

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3479

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6245

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4487

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6923

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7482

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5104

KRW

South Korean won

1 297,10

ZAR

South African rand

16,1202

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8366

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4543

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 536,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6410

PHP

Philippine peso

56,731

RUB

Russian rouble

70,5328

THB

Thai baht

33,488

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4158

MXN

Mexican peso

21,1244

INR

Indian rupee

78,4355

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amendment No.
1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report of Regis Corporation (the Registrant) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paul D.
Finkelstein, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  October 29, 2010  /s/ PAUL D. FINKELSTEINPaul D. Finkelstein,Chairman of the
  Board of Directors,President and
  Chief Executive Officer