alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
49.303-5 Final settlement. ( a ) The TCO shall proceed with the settlement and execution of a settlement agreement upon receipt of the audit report, if applicable, and the contract audit closing statement covering vouchered costs.
( b ) The TCO shall adjust the fee as provided in 49.305.
( c ) The final settlement agreement may include all demands of the Government and proposals of the contractor under the terminated contract. However, no amount shall be allowed for any item of cost disallowed by the Government, nor for any other item of cost of the same nature.
( d ) If an overall settlement of costs is agreed upon, agreement on each element of cost is not necessary. If appropriate, differences may be compromised and doubtful questions settled by agreement. An overall settlement shall not include costs that are clearly not allowable under the terms of the contract.
[48 FR 42447, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated at 61 FR 39221, July 26, 1996]
4.1301 Policy. ( a ) Agencies must follow FIPS PUB Number 201 and the associated OMB implementation guidance for personal identity verification for all affected contractor and subcontractor personnel when contract performance requires contractors to have routine physical access to a Federally-controlled facility and/or routine access to a Federally-controlled information system.
( b ) Agencies must include their implementation of FIPS PUB 201 and OMB Guidance M-05-24 in solicitations and contracts that require the contractor to have routine physical access to a Federally-controlled facility and/or routine access to a Federally-controlled information system.
( c ) Agencies must designate an official responsible for verifying contractor employee personal identity.
( d ) ( 1 ) Agency procedures for the return of Personal Identity Verification (PIV) products shall ensure that Government contractors account for all forms of Government-provided identification issued to Government contractor employees under a contract, *i.e.,* the PIV cards or other similar badges, and shall ensure that contractors return such identification to the issuing agency as soon as any of the following occurs, unless otherwise determined by the agency: ( i ) When no longer needed for contract performance.
( ii ) Upon completion of a contractor employee's employment.
( iii ) Upon contract completion or termination.
( 2 ) The contracting officer may delay final payment under a contract if the contractor fails to comply with these requirements.
[72 FR 46335, Aug. 17, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 82576, Dec. 30, 2010]
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-065-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
- ir86-3322-scan1
- ir86-3322-scan2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T09:57:31-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 41146 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

J. NICANOR HERNANDEZ

- GUTIERREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18

- CR

- 219

- 1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent J. Nicanor Hernandez

- Gutierrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez

- Gutierrez h as filed a response wherein he
seeks new counsel . We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Hernandez

- Gutierrez ’ s response . We

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 3, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-41146 Document: 00515021329 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2019No. 18

- 41146

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Hernandez

- Gutierrez’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED, c ounsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DIS MISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-41146 Document: 00515021329 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2019
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: A First Look: Students’ Access to Educational Opportunities in the Nation’s Public Schools      

# Report: A First Look: Students’ Access to Educational Opportunities in the Nation’s Public Schools

This report (PDF, 29 pages) provides an overview of data from the 2020–21 Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) on these topics: 
                  -  Student enrollment in dual enrollment or dual credit programs  
                  -  Access to preschool programs  
                  -  Access to mathematics, science, and computer science courses and other programs  
                  -  Access to internet and devices  
                  -  Teachers and school support staff  
                  -  School climate and safety  

**Learn more** (PDF, 29 pages).
<PAGE>
                           FORM 10-Q/A

                         AMENDMENT NO. 1

                          UNITED STATES

                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549

                    _________________________

(Mark One)

[X]    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
         SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period
ended.............................................March 31, 1998

                                OR

[ ]    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
       SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from.............to....................
Commission file number.....................................1-3268

            CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION        
    (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEW YORK                              14-0555980      
(State or other jurisdiction of            (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)              Identification No.)

284 SOUTH AVENUE, POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK         12601-4879    
(Address of principal executive offices)         (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including 
area code (914) 452-2000

    Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes   X    No       

    Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of
the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable
date.  Common stock, par value $5.00 per share; 16,911,387 shares
outstanding as of September 30, 1998.

    Registrant, in response to the Commission's letter of
comments, dated November 23, 1998, hereby amends Exhibit 12 to
correct certain minor errors.  Amended Exhibit 12 is attached
hereto.

                            SIGNATURES

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned hereunder duly authorized.

              CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION
                   (Registrant)



              By:    (SGD.) DONNA S.DOYLE                
                   Donna S. Doyle
                   Controller Authorized Officer and  
                      Chief Accounting Officer


Dated:   December 8, 1998
<PAGE>
                        INDEX TO EXHIBITS




Exhibit Number
(Registration S-K
     Item 601
Designation)                           Exhibit


  (12)                   Statement Showing Computation of the
                         Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
                         the Ratio of Earnings to Combined fixed
                         Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends

  (27)                   Financial Data Schedule, pursuant to
                         Item 601(c) of Regulation S-K.     

</PAGE>
#### William R. Ginsberg, Appellant, v. William Roberts et al., Defendants, and Abraham Adelman, Respondent.

In a mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff mortgagee appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 17, 1963, as granted the defendant Adelman’s motion, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out as sham paragraph Fifteenth of the complaint alleging that: “Ho other action has been commenced for the recovery of the indebtedness secured by the said mortgage.” The order granted leave to .plaintiff to serve an amended complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff’s time to serve the amended complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Prior to institution of this foreclosure action, the plaintiff mortgagee, as coplaintiff with the mortgagor, commenced an action against an insurance company to recover for a fire loss. The insurance policy, issued to the mortgagor, contained the usual mortgagee clause requiring payment of the policy proceeds to the mortgagee to the extent of his interest. Any payment received by the mortgagee from the insurance company would reduce the mortgage debt *pro tanto,*or, if large enough, would discharge it completely. Rule 255 of the Rules of Civil Practice provides that a foreclosure complaint “must state whether any other action has been 'brought to recover any part of the mortgage debt, and if so, whether any part thereof has been collected.” In our opinion, the prior action on the fire insurance policy is such “other action” within the ambit of rule 255. Hence, the allegation in the complaint to the effect that no other action has been commenced for the recovery of the indebtedness secured by the mortgage is sham and Special Term’s order striking it out (with leave to replead) was proper. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 436.203 Government estimate of construction costs.

For acquisitions using sealed bid procedures, the contracting officer may disclose the overall amount of the Government's estimate of construction costs following identification of the responsive bid most advantageous to the Government; verification of that bid's price reasonableness; and verification of the bidder's responsibility. For acquisitions using other than sealed bid procedures (e.g., negotiation), the contracting officer may disclose the overall amount of the estimate after contract award.
# C_2020327EN.01000501.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 October 2020

(2020/C 327/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1730 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4414 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90673 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4250 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0790 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 162,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,9040 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,020 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 358,88 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4944 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8715 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,0787 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6372 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5603 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0910 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7674 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5988 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 364,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,4002 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9656 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5620 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 445,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8850 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,864 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 92,0825 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,991 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,6039 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,6582 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,0375 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1730

JPY

Japanese yen

123,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4414

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90673

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4250

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0790

ISK

Iceland króna

162,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,9040

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,020

HUF

Hungarian forint

358,88

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4944

RON

Romanian leu

4,8715

TRY

Turkish lira

9,0787

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6372

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5603

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0910

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7674

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5988

KRW

South Korean won

1 364,68

ZAR

South African rand

19,4002

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9656

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5620

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 445,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8850

PHP

Philippine peso

56,864

RUB

Russian rouble

92,0825

THB

Thai baht

36,991

BRL

Brazilian real

6,6039

MXN

Mexican peso

25,6582

INR

Indian rupee

86,0375

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2018255EN.01001501.xml

| 20.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/15

---

Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

EGTC Helicas

(2018/C 255/05)

I.   Name of the EGTC, address and contact point

Name of the EGTC, address and contact point

Registered name: There is no change

Registered name

Registered office: There is no change

Registered office

Contact point: There is no change

Contact point

Email: helicas.egtc@gmail.com

Email

Internet address of the grouping: Under construction

Internet address of the grouping

II.   Changes concerning the contact point, director, registered office, internet address of the EGTC

Changes concerning the contact point, director, registered office, internet address of the EGTC

New contact point: There is no change

New contact point

New responsible (Director): Yiannis Anastasiadis

New responsible (Director)

New registered office: There is no change

New registered office

New internet address: Under construction

New internet address

III.   New members (1)

New members

1

There are not new members

Official name:

Official name

Postal address:

Postal address

Internet address:

Internet address

Type of member:

Type of member

State:

State

---

(1)  Please add as many as new members are.

1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 15, 2023. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 15, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24A0508. WILLIAM FRANKLIN MORTON, JR. v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
46.703 Criteria for use of warranties. The use of warranties is not mandatory. In determining whether a warranty is appropriate for a specific acquisition, the contracting officer shall consider the following factors: ( a ) *Nature and use of the supplies or services.* This includes such factors as— ( 1 ) Complexity and function;
( 2 ) Degree of development;
( 3 ) State of the art;
( 4 ) End use;
( 5 ) Difficulty in detecting defects before acceptance; and
( 6 ) Potential harm to the Government if the item is defective.
( b ) *Cost.* Warranty costs arise from— ( 1 ) The contractor's charge for accepting the deferred liability created by the warranty; and
( 2 ) Government administration and enforcement of the warranty (see paragraph (c) below).
( c ) *Administration and enforcement.* The Government's ability to enforce the warranty is essential to the effectiveness of any warranty. There must be some assurance that an adequate administrative system for reporting defects exists or can be established. The adequacy of a reporting system may depend upon such factors as the— ( 1 ) Nature and complexity of the item;
( 2 ) Location and proposed use of the item;
( 3 ) Storage time for the item;
( 4 ) Distance of the using activity from the source of the item;
( 5 ) Difficulty in establishing existence of defects; and
( 6 ) Difficulty in tracing responsibility for defects.
( d ) *Trade practice.* In many instances an item is customarily warranted in the trade, and, as a result of that practice, the cost of an item to the Government will be the same whether or not a warranty is included. In those instances, it would be in the Government's interest to include such a warranty.
( e ) *Reduced requirements.* The contractor's charge for assumption of added liability may be partially or completely offset by reducing the Government's contract quality assurance requirements where the warranty provides adequate assurance of a satisfactory product.
4.1001 Policy. In order to improve the accuracy, traceability, and usability of procurement data, procurement instruments shall identify the supplies or services to be acquired as separately identified line items and, as needed, subline items. ( a ) Line items are established to define deliverables or organize information about deliverables. Each line item describes characteristics for the item purchased, *e.g.,* pricing, delivery, and funding information.
( b ) Each line item may be subdivided into separate unique subsets (called subline items) to ease administration. If a line item has deliverable subline items, the line item is informational. Subline items differentiate between or among certain characteristics of the line item, such as colors or sizes, dates of delivery, destinations, or places of performance. Subline items are established to define deliverables or organize information about deliverables.
# C_2021128EN.01000101.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 128/01)

Last publication

OJ C 110, 29.3.2021

Past publications

OJ C 98, 22.3.2021

OJ C 88, 15.3.2021

OJ C 79, 8.3.2021

OJ C 72, 1.3.2021

OJ C 62, 22.2.2021

OJ C 53, 15.2.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John F. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Hytek Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Hytek Microsystems, Inc.


                                      By: /s/ John F. Cole
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Name: John F. Cole
                                      Title: President & Chief Executive Officer

I, Sally B. Chapman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Hytek Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Hytek Microsystems, Inc.


                                      By: /s/ Sally B. Chapman
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Name: Sally B. Chapman
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer & Secretary