9420 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 28 / Friday, February 12, 2021 / Notices 

1ECRT states that IHB currently operates over the 

Line pursuant to a private side track agreement 

dated July 1, 1985, between IHB and a Chrome 

predecessor, Standard Forgings Company. 

02/04/2021, Private Non-Profit 

organizations that provide essential 

services of a governmental nature may 

file disaster loan applications at the 

address listed above or other locally 

announced locations. 

The following areas have been 

determined to be adversely affected by 

the disaster: 

Primary Counties/Areas: Douglas, 

Franklin, Kittitas, Lincoln, 

Okanogan, Pend Oreille, Skamania, 

Whitman, Yakima and the 

Confederated Tribes of the Colville 

Reservation and the Confederated 

Tribes and Bands of the Yakama 

Nation. 

The Interest Rates are: 

For Physical Damage: 

Non-Profit Organizations with 

Credit Available Elsewhere ... 2.750 

Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ..................................... 2.750 

For Economic Injury: 

Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ..................................... 2.750 

The number assigned to this disaster 

for physical damage is 16864 5 and for 

economic injury is 16865 0. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Number 59008) 

Cynthia Pitts, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2021–02880 Filed 2–11–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8026–03–P 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD 

[Docket No. FD 36482] 

East Chicago Rail Terminal, LLC— 

Acquisition and Operation 

Exemption—Rail Line of Chrome, LLC 

at East Chicago, Ind. 

East Chicago Rail Terminal, LLC 

(ECRT), a noncarrier, has filed a verified 

notice of exemption under 49 CFR 

1150.31 to acquire from Chrome, LLC 

(Chrome), and operate approximately 

467 feet of track between the connection 

to Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad 

Company (IHB) at a point 363 feet north 

of the center line of Michigan Avenue 

at East Chicago, Ind., and the end of 

track on private property of Chrome at 

East Chicago, Ind. (the Line). According 

to the verified notice, the Line is not 

identified by mileposts. 

ECRT states that an agreement has 

been reached under which Chrome will 

convey the Line to ECRT. ECRT further 

states that, after consummation, it will 

provide common carrier rail service to 

Tri-Star DEF LLC, and also will hold 

itself out to provide common carrier rail 

service over the Line.1

ECRT certifies that the proposed 

acquisition and operation of the Line 

does not involve a provision or 

agreement that may limit future 

interchange with a third-party 

connecting carrier. ECRT further 

certifies that its projected annual 

revenues as a result of this transaction 

will not exceed the maximum revenue 

of a Class III rail carrier and will not 

exceed $5 million. 

The transaction may be consummated 

on or after February 26, 2021, the 

effective date of the exemption (30 days 

after the verified notice was filed). 

If the verified notice contains false or 

misleading information, the exemption 

is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the 

exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) 

may be filed at any time. The filing of 

a petition to revoke will not 

automatically stay the effectiveness of 

the exemption. Petitions for stay must 

be filed no later than February 19, 2021 

(at least seven days before the 

exemption becomes effective). 

All pleadings, referring to Docket No. 

FD 36482, should be filed with the 

Surface Transportation Board via efiling on the Board’s website. In 

addition, a copy of each pleading must 

be served on ECRT’s representative, 

Thomas F. McFarland, Thomas F. 

McFarland, P.C., 2230 Marston Lane, 

Flossmoor, IL 60422–1336. 

According to ECRT, this action is 

categorically excluded from 

environmental review under 49 CFR 

1105.6 and from historic reporting 

requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8. 

Board decisions and notices are 

available at www.stb.gov. 

Decided: February 8, 2021. 

By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Director, 

Office of Proceedings. 

Eden Besera, 

Clearance Clerk. 

[FR Doc. 2021–02846 Filed 2–11–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915–01–P 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

Notice Regarding Periodic Revision of 

Section 301 Action: Enforcement of 

U.S. WTO Rights in Large Civil Aircraft 

Dispute 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative (USTR). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Trade 

Representative together with the 

affected United States industry have 

agreed that it is unnecessary at this time 

to revise the action in the Section 301 

investigation involving the enforcement 

of U.S. rights in the World Trade 

Organization (WTO) dispute involving 

Large Civil Aircraft subsidies provided 

by certain current or former member 

States of the European Union. The U.S. 

Trade Representative will continue to 

consider the action taken in the 

investigation. 

DATES: This exception to periodic 

revisions is applicable as of February 8, 

2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions about the investigation or this 

notice, contact Associate General 

Counsel Megan Grimball, at (202) 395– 

5725, or Director for Europe Michael 

Rogers, at (202) 395–3320. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Proceedings in the Investigation 

For background on the proceedings in 

this investigation, please see the prior 

notices issued in the investigation, 

including: Notice of initiation (84 FR 

15028 (April 12, 2019)); notice of 

determination and action (84 FR 54245 

(October 9, 2019)); and notices of 

revision of action (85 FR 10204 

(February 21, 2020), 85 FR 50866 

(August 18, 2020), and 86 FR 674 

(January 6, 2021)). 

B. Periodic Revisions and Exceptions 

Thereto 

Section 306(b)(2)(B)–(F) of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, provides for 

periodic revisions of the list of goods 

subject to additional duties imposed in 

response to the failure of a U.S. trading 

partner to implement a WTO Dispute 

Settlement Body (DSB) 

recommendation. The statute includes 

exceptions to the periodic revisions. As 

relevant here, section 306(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II) 

provides that no revision is required if 

the U.S. Trade Representative and the 

U.S. industry affected by the noncompliance with the DSB 

recommendation agree that a revision of 

the list is unnecessary.