Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [C-533-839]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the “Final Results of Review” section of this notice.
 DATES: Applicable February 9, 2021.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3148.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 29, 2004, Commerce published its CVD order on CVP 23 from India in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    .[1]
                    
                     On October 1, 2020, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the third sunset review of the 
                    *Order,*
                     pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).[2]
                    
                     Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from Sun Chemical Corporation (domestic interested party or Sun), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).[3]
                    
                     Sun claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic producer of CVP 23 in the United States. Commerce received a substantive response from the domestic interested 
                    ( print page 8765)
                    party [4]
                    
                     within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no substantive response from any other domestic or respondent interested parties in this proceeding, nor was a hearing requested. On November 20, 2020, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.[5]
                    
                     As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this 
                    *Order.* Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the scope of the 
                    *Order*
                     is CVP 23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-30-1, with the chemical name of 
                    *diindolo [3,2-b:3′,2′-m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5,15-diethy-5,15-dihydro-,*
                     and molecular formula of C34H22Cl2N4O2.[6]
                    
                     The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form (
                    *e.g.,*
                     dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the form of presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (
                    *e.g.,*
                     pigments dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included within the scope of the order. The merchandise subject to this 
                    *Order*
                     is classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise covered by the scope of the 
                    *Order*
                     is dispositive. For a complete description of the scope of the 
                    *Order, see*
                     the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.[7] Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via the Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *http://access.trade.gov.*
                     In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at 
                    *http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​.*
                     The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the CVD order on CVP-23 from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following rates: Manufacturers/producers/
                             exporters
Net
                             countervailable 
                             subsidy rate 
                             
                                (
                                *ad valorem*)
                             
                             (percent)Alpanil Industries Ltd
14.93Pidilite Industries Ltd
15.24AMI Pigments Pvt. Ltd
33.61All Others
18.66
 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: January 29, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. History of the Order IV. Scope of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India,*69 FR 77995 (December 29, 2004) (
                        *Order*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review,*85 FR 61928 (October 1, 2020). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Sun's Letter, “Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the Republic of India: Notice of Intent to Participate In 3rd Sunset Review of Countervailing Duty Order,” dated October 9, 2020. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Sun's Letter, “Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the Republic of India: Petitioner's Substantive Response,” dated October 30, 2020. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Commerce's Letter, “Sunset Reviews Initiated on October 1, 2020,” dated November 20, 2020. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         The bracketed section of the product description, 
                        *[3,2-b:3′,2′-m],*
                         is not business proprietary information; the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2021-02598 Filed 2-8-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P