alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019189EN.01004301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/43 |

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2019/C 189/11)

![Image 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2019.189.01.0043.01.ENG.xhtml.C_2019189EN.01004302.tif.jpg)

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Greece

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019189EN.01004301-E0001). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019189EN.01004301-E0002), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country
: Greece

Subject of commemoration
: Centenary of the birth of Manolis Andronicos

Description of the design
: Manolis Andronicos (1919-1992) was one of Greece’s greatest archaeologists. His discovery of the royal tombs at Vergina in 1977 brought to light exquisite finds that attest to the splendour of ancient Macedonian civilisation.

The design features a portrait of Manolis Andronicos. Inscribed along the inner edge at left is the name ‘MANOLIS ANDRONICOS 1919-1992’, along with the minting year and a palmette (mintmark of the Greek Mint); inscribed along the inner edge at right is the wording ‘HELLENIC REPUBLIC’. Also visible at the right is the monogram of the artist (George Stamatopoulos).

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
:

750 000

Date of issue
: June 2019

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019189EN.01004301-E0001)  See [OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2001_373_R_TOC) for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019189EN.01004301-E0002)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation ([OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2009_009_R_TOC)).

---
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before GASTON , HOUTZ , and STARITA Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Cortlyn D

. HARRIS Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E

- 3 ), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202000102

Decided: 26 August 2020
Appeal from the United State s Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:

Chad Temple
Sentence adjudged 27 February 2020 by a genera l court

- martial convened at Naval Base San Diego , C alifornia , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : confinement for 120 day s and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Captain Daniel J. McCoy, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.United States v. Harri s , No. 202000102 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted with out assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866 (2018)

. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk o f Court
#### Gregory T. Van Meter, administrator of the estate of Henry C. Eckart, deceased, appellee, v. B. J. Bonk et al., appellants.

Gen No. 30,449.

Bill for accounting and an injunction. Decree for complainant. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar Hebei, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

O’Donnell & O’Donnell, for appellants.

Hoag & Ullmann, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 3001.403 Individual deviations.

Unless precluded by law, executive order, or other regulation, the HCA is authorized to approve individual deviation (except with respect to (FAR) 48 CFR 30.201-3, 30.201-4; the requirements of the Cost Accounting Standards board rules and regulations at 48 CFR chapter 99 (FAR appendix); and part 50). Submit requests per (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.7000, including complete documentation of the justification for the deviations (*See* HSAM 3001.403).

[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 48801, Aug. 22, 2006; 77 FR 50632, Aug. 22, 2012]
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02993

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# C_2017312EN.01000301.xml

| 20.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 312/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : France

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 25th anniversary of the pink ribbon, symbol of the fight against breast cancer

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : Since the 1990s, the fight against breast cancer has been a major cause around the world. On the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the pink ribbon, iconic symbol of this fight, Monnaie de Paris has decided to support this cause. For nearly 15 years, a pink ribbon prize has been presented every year to support research efforts and innovation.

Description of the design

The design represents a woman’s bust symbolically protected by a hand and the ribbon. It is surrounded, at the right side, by the inscription ‘25e ANNIVERSAIRE DU RUBAN ROSE’ (25th anniversary of the pink ribbon). The right side also features the years ‘1992 – 2017’, the indication of the issuing country ‘RF’ and the mintmarks.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 10 million coins

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  :

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
#### G. Patrick Du Pell et al., Respondents, v. State Liquor Authority et al., Appellants.

*Per Curiam.*

Decision of this court dated December 17, *9901964 (22 A D 2d 982) amended, and as amended to be as follows: Order appealed from, which denied vacatur of the stay contained in the order to show cause signed November 24, 1964, modified by vacating the stay insofar as it ordered that defendant, State Liquor Authority, is hereby stayed “ from accepting or processing applications for new licenses to sell liquor at retail for consumption off the premises”, and insofar as it may be interpreted to restrain the processing of applications for locations within 1,500 feet of an existing location, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Poorten, Divita and Peperone, Respondents, v. Joan M. Polland, an Infant, Appellant.

Motionto strike appendix to appellant’s brief denied, without costs. Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party and proceeding dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Section 475 of the Judiciary Law provides “From the commencement of an action * the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon *his client’s*cause of action”. (Emphasis supplied.) Even though it was determined that the infant had approved the selection of an attorney by her father who did not have her legal custody (cf. CPLR 1201), nevertheless those services were effectively disapproved before the eommencemeni of any action on her behalf. Thus when the respondents commenced an action on behalf of the infant on November 9, 1963 they were not her attorneys and *976no lien came into being. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term fixing and determining the lien of petitioners as attorneys.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.
#### 326.602-1 Scope of part.

Except as provided in HHSAR 326.602-2, this subpart applies to all acquisitions above the micro-purchase threshold, including simplified acquisitions, made by IHS, and any HHS operating divisions or agency outside of IHS conducting acquisitions on behalf of IHS.
Williams. Renee (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Leslie Myrbeck [Leslie.Myrbeck@capeair.com] 

Wednesday, August 25,20105:02 PM 

Undisclosed recipients 

Subject: DOT-OST-2003-14822 letter of support for Cape Air - Lebanon, NH 

Please find below a letter of support regarding Cape Air. This is in reference to the current 

RFP issued by the Department of Transportation. 

Thank you very much. 

Sincerely, 

Leslie Myrbeck 

Cape Air 

-----Original Message-----

From: Leslie King Witt [mailto:kingwitt@cape.com] 

Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:10 AM 

To: Ed Larocque 

Subject: 

To whom it may concern: 

I am writing to express my deep appreciation for the wonderful service that Cape Air has 

provided to my family and friends through the past year. 

As an international family with homes in Moscow, Russia and the Northeast Kingdom of Vermont, 

with college-aged kids spread across the globe, Cape Air's superlative service between Boston 

Logan Airport, White Plains, New York and West Lebanon, New Hampshire, is the critical 

linchpin that holds our whole transportation system together. 

Cape Air never, ever lets us down. They always deliver service with a smile, giving above and 

beyond what would be called for in every situation. They spoil me for other airlines because, 

with Cape Air, I always know my family will get home on time and be treated with care and 

kindness. In particular, the West Lebanon, New Hampshire ground staff, with Ed LaRocque at 

the helm, always gets us to where we need to go, while treating us like treasured friends. 

I cannot recommend highly enough the service of Cape Air out of West Lebanon, New Hampshire. 

Cape Air's staff are professionals who always come through with the best, most reliable 

service possible, in every situation. 

Thank you, 

Leslie Witt 

Peacham, Vermont 

kingwitt@cape.com 

Vermont House 802-592-3130 

US Cell 508-566-3576 

Skype kingwittleslie 

Facebook Leslie Klein Witt 

1
314.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award. ( e ) The HCA has the authority to make determinations under paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of FAR 14.407-3.
3025.7002-2 Exceptions. Acquisitions in the following categories are not subject to the restrictions in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-1: ( a ) Acquisitions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.
( b ) Acquisition of items not directly related to national security interests of the United States.
( c ) Acquisitions of any of the items otherwise covered by (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-1, if the Chief Procurement Officer determines that the item grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States cannot be acquired as and when needed in a satisfactory quality and sufficient quantity at United States market prices. When this exception is used— ( 1 ) Only the DHS Chief Procurement Officer is authorized to make the domestic nonavailability determination.
( 2 ) The DHS Component, not later than 7 days after the award of the contract, must post a notification that the exception has been applied on the Government-wide point of entry, which may be combined with any synopsis of award.
( 3 ) The supporting documentation for the CPO determination prepared by the DHS Component(s) shall include— ( i ) An analysis of alternatives that would not require a domestic nonavailability determination; and
( ii ) A written justification by the requiring activity, with specificity, why such alternatives are unacceptable.
( d ) Acquisitions of items listed in FAR 48 CFR 25.104.
( e ) Emergency acquisitions by activities located outside the United States.
( f ) Acquisitions by vessels in foreign waters.
( g ) Acquisitions of incidental amounts of cotton, other natural fibers, wool or other item covered by (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-1(a)-(b) incorporated in an end product, for which the estimated value of the item so covered is not more than 10 percent of the total price of the end product.
( h ) Acquisitions of items otherwise covered by (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-1(a) and (b) for which restricting a procurement of the items to those that have been grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States would be inconsistent with United States obligations under international agreements. Acquisitions of products that are eligible products per (FAR) 48 CFR subpart 25.4 are not covered by these restrictions; see (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7003-2 for specific application of trade agreements.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00030- CV

Jasm ine Charm aine Herndon, Ap pellant

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 201 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 08- 0062 68, H ONO RAB LE SCO TT H . JENK INS, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After ap p el l ant filed her notice of appea l, the cler k’s rec ord was filed in this Court on J anuar

y 7, 2011, and the repor

ter’s rec ord was filed on Fe bruar y 10, 2011. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed and was g rante d two motions for ext ension of time to file the brief, but
on April 4, 2011, the trial court signe d an order allowing counsel to withdraw from the case . After appellant failed to respond to our notices rela ted to the cause , we abate d the appea l, asking the trial court to hold a hear ing to deter mine whether appellant still wished to pursue the appea l, whether she was indige nt, and whether new appellate counsel should be appointed. See Tex. R. App. P
. 38.8(a) (2); In re T.V. , 8 S.W .3d 448, 449-50 (Te x . App.—Waco 1999, order) (holding that to adequa

tely protec t indige nt pare nt’s rig hts in termination case , court should abate appea l to allow trial court to hold hear ing to deter mine issues raised in Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)) ; see also Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(b)( 3).The court has provided a supplemental cler k’s rec ord containing an order signe d afte r the reque sted hear ing. The court deter mined that appellant had abandone d her appea l and found that it wa s not ne cessa

ry to a ppoint new appe llate counse l and that appe llant had not br oug ht f orth any evidenc e to prove she wa s indige nt. The trial cour t rec ommended that the a ppeal be dismiss ed. Appellant has not filed any kind of response to the supplemental cler k’s rec ord or to
a n y o f o u r n o ti c e s , d a

ti n g b a c k to Ju ly 2 0 1 1
. We th e r e f o r e d is mi s s th e a

p p e a l f o r w a n t o f p r o s e c u ti o n . See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Henson a nd Goodwin Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Mar ch 13, 2012

2
# Title III Part B, Historically Black Colleges and Universities Program

# FY 2016 Non-Competing Continuation Awards

[9/14/2016]
# C_2018037EN.01002701.xml

| 1.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/27

---

Call for proposals

EIBI’s 2018 Social Innovation Tournament

(2018/C 37/08)

EIB Institute organises its seventh Social Innovation Tournament.

The SIT promotes innovative ideas and rewards opportunities that create societal impact, covering projects in a wide range of fields — from education, healthcare and job creation, to new technologies, new systems and new processes. All projects compete for two prizes in a General Category, and projects addressing this year’s topic of sustainable development (with special emphasis on circular economy) will also compete for two prizes in the Special Category. Winning projects in both categories are awarded a 1st and 2nd prize of EUR 50 000 and EUR 20 000 respectively.

Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/EibInstitute

For further information on this tournament and how to submit an innovative proposal, go to:

http://institute.eib.org/programmes/social/social-innovation-tournament/

---
#### 3028.311-1 Contract clause.

Insert a clause substantially similar to (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.228-70, “Insurance,” in all solicitations and contracts that contain the clause at (FAR) 48 CFR 52.228-7, unless waived by an official one level above the contracting officer.
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 169 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 

Plants; Endangered Species Status With Critical Habitat for Guadalupe 

Fatmucket, Texas Fatmucket, Guadalupe Orb, Texas Pimpleback, 

Balcones Spike, and False Spike, and Threatened Species Status With 

Section 4(d) Rule and Critical Habitat for Texas Fawnsfoot’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. ROY, and Mr. PFLUGER) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to 

‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status With Critical Habitat for Guadalupe Fatmucket, Texas Fatmucket, Guadalupe Orb, 

Texas Pimpleback, Balcones Spike, and False Spike, and 

Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule and 

Critical Habitat for Texas Fawnsfoot’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 169 IH 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

2 United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘En3 dangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endan4 gered Species Status With Critical Habitat for Guadalupe 

5 Fatmucket, Texas Fatmucket, Guadalupe Orb, Texas 

6 Pimpleback, Balcones Spike, and False Spike, and Threat7 ened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule and Critical 

8 Habitat for Texas Fawnsfoot’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 48034; pub9 lished June 4, 2024), and such rule shall have no force 

10 or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2017388EN.01000601.xml

| 17.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 388/06)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Austria

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 100 years of the Austrian Republic

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design depicts the statue of Pallas Athena in front of the Greek-style building of the Austrian Parliament in Vienna. The goddess of wisdom serves as a symbol of the Austrian parliamentarism and stands for knowledge, reason and strategic talent. At the left side is the year ‘2018’ and underneath the text ‘100 JAHRE’ (100 YEARS). The text ‘REPUBLIK ÖSTERREICH’ (AUSTRIAN REPUBLIC) is inscribed at the bottom right in semi-circle.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : December 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---