alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
31.205-37 Royalties and other costs for use of patents. ( a ) Royalties on a patent or amortization of the cost of purchasing a patent or patent rights necessary for the proper performance of the contract and applicable to contract products or processes are allowable unless— ( 1 ) The Government has a license or the right to a free use of the patent;
( 2 ) The patent has been adjudicated to be invalid, or has been administratively determined to be invalid;
( 3 ) The patent is considered to be unenforceable; or
( 4 ) The patent is expired.
( b ) Care should be exercised in determining reasonableness when the royalties may have been arrived at as a result of less-than-arm's-length bargaining; e.g., royalties— ( 1 ) Paid to persons, including corporations, affiliated with the contractor;
( 2 ) Paid to unaffiliated parties, including corporations, under an agreement entered into in contemplation that a Government contract would be awarded; or
( 3 ) Paid under an agreement entered into after the contract award.
( c ) In any case involving a patent formerly owned by the contractor, the royalty amount allowed should not exceed the cost which would have been allowed had the contractor retained title.
( d ) See 31.109 regarding advance agreements.
#### Harry A. Sultz, Appellant, v. Buffalo Eye Bank and Research Society, Inc. et al., Respondents.

Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to comply with CPLR 5530 granted unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before October 20, 1964. Motion to dismiss for failure to comply with CPLR 5513 denied in accordance with order to be entered herein.
## FY 2023

Projects funded:  PDF (806K)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00264

- CV

In re Darin J. Bassett and Kim A. Bassett

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay are denied.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a), id. R. 52.10

.

_______________________ ___________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: April 26, 2019
# Attachment A
#### The First National Bank of Ithaca *v.*Joseph McGraw, Respondent; Ezra Cornell, Appellant.

(Argued October 16, 1883 ;

decided October 26, 1883.)

*660
      *L. E. Warren*for appellant.

*S. D. Halliday*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion. All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

For press releases on this and other IFLE programs, go to the IFLE Press Releases page.

## FY 2023

                - List of Grantees and Abstracts:   MS Word  (1MB) 
                - Google Map of FY 2023 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2022

                - List of Grantees and Abstracts:   PDF  (580K)
                - Google Map of FY 2022 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2021

                - List of Grantees and Abstracts:   PDF  (654K)

## FY 2020

                - List of Grantees and Abstracts:   PDF  (685K)

## FY 2019

                - List of Grantees and Funding Amounts:   PDF  (141K)

## FY 2018

                - List of Grantees and Funding Amounts:   PDF  (126K)

## FY 2017

List of grantees by  world area and project abstracts for Short- and Long-Term Group Projects Abroad
                - Google  Map of IFLE FY 2017 Grantees

## FY 2016
List of grantees by world area and project abstracts for Short- and Long-Term Group Projects Abroad
-   MS Word  (540K)
- Google Map of IFLE FY 2016 Grantees
FY 2015
List of grantees by world area and project abstracts for Short-Term Group Projects Abroad
-   MS Word  (994K)
- Google Map of IFLE FY 2015 Grantees
FY 2014
List of grantees by world area and project abstracts for Short-Term Group Projects Abroad
-   MS Word  (973K)

IFLE Home
   Printable view  Last Modified: 11/15/2023How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity

 
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
- vote.gov
PR AWARD # INSTITUTION NAME STATE TYPE AWARD

P031N220001 University of Alaska Bristol Bay Campus AK 4-Year Public $824,990

P031W220004 Hawaii Pacific University HI 4-Year Private $722,060

P031W220006

University of Hawaii at Manoa (Cooperative Arrangement 

Development Grant with UH Maui) HI 4-Year Public $735,682

Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Program

FY 2022 Part A (84.031N and 84.031W)

 New Awards
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of eClickMD, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marion Robert Rice, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to the 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (SS) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/ MARION ROBERT RICE
-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2002
About FOIA | About the Privacy Act | **FOIA Reading Rooms**Making a Request | FAQs | Contacts | Links



### FOIA e-Reading Room

### Federal Student Aid  (FSA) 
  Frequently Requested Information

#### Grant Applications

The grant applications posted in the E-FOIA Reading Room are provided as a courtesy.  Because the documents have been produced by entities outside of the U.S. Department of Education who are not subject to the Department's standards for the accessibility of documents posted on the Internet, this material may not be accessible to individuals with disabilities.

In addition, the process of redaction and image scanning may further hamper the accessibility of these documents.

If you need assistance with these documents, please contact the FOIA Service Center by email at EDFOIAManager@ed.gov or call 202-401-8365.

- Cohort Default Rates Search and Download Page
- Closed Schools Search Page
- Program Reviews for Career Education Corporation's Collins College and Pennsylvania Culinary Institute

Collins College download filesPDF (7.89 MB)
Collins College 2 download filesPDF (6.51 MB)
Gibbs College download filesPDF (7.52 MB)
Gibbs College 2 download filesPDF (6.99 MB)
Pennsylvania Institute of Culinary Arts download filesPDF (3.44 MB)
Pennsylvania Institute of Culinary Arts 2 download filesPDF (6.51 MB)
- Collins College download filesPDF (7.89 MB)
- Collins College 2 download filesPDF (6.51 MB)
- Gibbs College download filesPDF (7.52 MB)
- Gibbs College 2 download filesPDF (6.99 MB)
- Pennsylvania Institute of Culinary Arts download filesPDF (3.44 MB)
- Pennsylvania Institute of Culinary Arts 2 download filesPDF (6.51 MB)
- Title IV Student Loan Management/Servicing Contracts

ED-FSA-D-0012 Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. download filesPDF (364K)
ED-FSA-D-0013 Nelnet, Servicing, LLC download filesPDF (392K)
ED-FSA-D-0014 Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency download filesPDF (356K)
ED-FSA-D-0015 SLM Corporation download filesPDF (288K)
- ED-FSA-D-0012 Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. download filesPDF (364K)
- ED-FSA-D-0013 Nelnet, Servicing, LLC download filesPDF (392K)
- ED-FSA-D-0014 Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency download filesPDF (356K)
- ED-FSA-D-0015 SLM Corporation download filesPDF (288K)

If you would like further information on FSA programs, click on this link.

|Last Modified: 06/26/2009
|-------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Marvin F.  Romanow,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period
     ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
     the date hereof (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
     Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 21, 2009

/s/ Marvin F. Romanow
---------------------------
Marvin F. Romanow
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOFFICES
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**Program Office:**Institutional Service

**CFDA Number:** 84.407B**Program Type:** Cooperative Agreement

## Program Description

The coordinating center is established through a cooperative agreement between the Department and institutions of higher education that offer inclusive comprehensive transition and postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities, including institutions participating in grants authorized under the Transition Programs for Students with Disabilities into Higher Education (TPSID).  The coordinating center will build a valid and reliable knowledge base around program components often linked to postsecondary outcomes including, but not limited to:  curricular and instructional interventions; academic advising structures; student assessment and credentialing processes; social and residential opportunities; and work and career development strategies.

## Types of Activities

The Coordinating Center will provide:
                - recommendations related to the development of standards for such programs;
                - technical assistance for such programs; and
                - evaluations for such programs.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Higher Education Policy |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### 2832.006-1 General.

The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 32.006-1.
3009.470-2 Policy. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, 10 U.S.C. 983 prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from providing funds by contract or grant to an institution of higher education if the Secretary of Defense determines that the institution has a policy or practice that prohibits or in effect prevents— ( 1 ) The Secretary of a military department from maintaining, establishing, or operating a unit of the Senior Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) at that institution;
( 2 ) A student at that institution from enrolling in a unit of the Senior ROTC at another institution of higher education;
( 3 ) The Secretary of a military department or the Secretary of Homeland Security from gaining entry to campuses, or access to students on campuses, for purposes of military recruiting; or
( 4 ) Military recruiters from accessing certain information pertaining to students enrolled at that institution.
( b ) The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this subsection does not apply to an institution of higher education if the Secretary of Defense determines that— ( 1 ) The institution (and each subelement of that institution) has ceased the policy or practice described in paragraph (a) of this subsection; or
( 2 ) The institution involved has a long-standing policy of pacifism based on historical religious affiliation.
#### 252.204-7004 Antiterrorism Awareness Training for Contractors.

As prescribed in 204.7203, use the following clause:

# Antiterrorism Awareness Training for Contractors (JAN 2023)

(a) *Definition.* As used in this clause—

*Military installation* means a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, or other activity under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of a military department or, in the case of an activity in a foreign country, under the operational control of the Secretary of a military department or the Secretary of Defense (see 10 U.S.C. 2801(c)(4)).

(b) *Training.* Contractor personnel who require routine physical access to a Federally-controlled facility or military installation shall complete Level I antiterrorism awareness training within 30 days of requiring access and annually thereafter. In accordance with Department of Defense Instruction O-2000.16 Volume 1, DoD Antiterrorism (AT) Program Implementation: DoD AT Standards, Level I antiterrorism awareness training shall be completed—

(1) Through a DoD-sponsored and certified computer or web-based distance learning instruction for Level I antiterrorism awareness; or

(2) Under the instruction of a Level I antiterrorism awareness instructor.

(c) *Additional information.* Information and guidance pertaining to DoD antiterrorism awareness training is available at *https://jko.jten.mil/* or as otherwise identified in the performance work statement.

(d) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (d), in subcontracts, including subcontracts for commercial products and commercial services, when subcontractor performance requires routine physical access to a Federally-controlled facility or military installation.

(End of clause)

[84 FR 4364, Feb. 15, 2019, as amended at 88 FR 6589, Jan. 31, 2023]
#### 3424.701 Authority.

This subpart implements the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA or the Act), 20 U.S.C. 1232g. Additional FERPA-implementing regulations are found at 34 CFR part 99.
# C_2020053EN.01000401.xml

| 17.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2020/C 53/04)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Lithuania

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Lithuania

Subject of commemoration: Aukštaitija (from the series Lithuanian Etnographic Regions)

Description of the design: The design features a coat of arms with an armour-clad knight holding a sword in his right hand. The coat of arms is held by two angels, simbolically exalting and protecting Aukštaitija – one of the most important regions of Lithuania and the cradle of its statehood.

Below is a Latin inscription PATRIAM TUAM MUNDUM EXISTIMA (CONSIDER YOUR HOMELAND TO BE THE WHOLE WORLD).

The design is surrounded by inscriptions: ‘LIETUVA’ (the name of the issuing country), ‘AUKŠTAITIJA’, the year of issuance ‘2020’ and the mintmark of the Lithuanian Mint.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 500 000

Date of issue: Third quarter of 2020

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, pp. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Walter Blythe, Respondent, v. Mead C. Cochran et al., Respondents, and American Casualty Company, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Appellant’s policy of workmen’s compensation insurance covered employer’s operations in Pennsylvania. The Workmen’s Compensation Board has found that the intention of both the insurer and the employer was that the policy should cover operations in New York and its decision reformed the policy accordingly. Upon a proper record such reformation of the policy lies within the board’s power. *(Boyal Ind. Co.*v. *Seller,*256 N. Y. 322; *Neath*v. *State of New York,*278 App. Div. 8.) The record shows that the employer applied for coverage through a licensed agent in Pennsylvania authorized to bind the appellant carrier and told her that the work was to be performed in New York. This was referred by the agent to appellant’s office in Pittsburgh and after this reference the agent told the employer he was covered in New York. This embraces an aspect of the proof most favorable to the decision appealed from and within the fact-finding power of the board. In these circumstances a mutual mistake would have existed which would warrant reformation. Although the board placed heavy reliance on its conclusion that the carrier was estopped from asserting noncoverage in New York because an audit would have disclosed only a New York operation and it made no such audit, the decision is sufficiently broad in scope to rest upon mutual mistake, i.e., the finding is that the work “was done solely in New York ” and “ The employer requested * * * compensation insurance to cover * * * such work.” The decision upon this and other findings was that “ the policy of insurance ” is “ reformed to cover the business operations in New York.” We do not agree with the other basis of the decision that a mere failure to audit works an estoppel to deny what an audit, if made, would have shown. This concept does violence to the usual conditions underlying the rule of estoppel. But the finding of mutual mistake sufficiently sustains the decision. Decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board against appellant carrier. Bergan, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### In Re: Shannon SABB, Petitioner.

No. 07-6707.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 24, 2007.

Decided: Nov. 6, 2007.

Shannon Sabb, Petitioner Pro se.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shannon Sabb petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the magistrate judge has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the magistrate judge to act. Our review of the district court docket report reveals that the magistrate judge has issued a report and recommendation and that the district court has adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed Sabb’s § 2254 petition. Accordingly, because Sabb has obtained the relief he sought, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *268the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*