ANP requirement Citation within 40 CFR 58 Notes [Checked by SMAQMD for 2013 Plan]

1 Submit plan by July 1st 58.10 (a)(1)

2 Statement of purpose for each monitor 58.10 (a)(1) Appendix B

3 30-day public comment / inspection period 58.10 (a)(1), 58.10 (a)(2) Completed, no comments received

4 Modifications to SLAMS network – case when we are not 

approving actual system modifications (i.e., we will do it 

outside the ANP process )

58.10 (a)(2), 58.10(e), Not requesting approval thru this network 

plan; however, possible modification are 

discussed in Section 4

5 Modifications to SLAMS network – case when we are 

approving actual system modifications per 58.14(c)

58.10 (a)(2), 58.10 (b)(5), 

58.10(e), 58.14 (c)

Not requesting approval thru this network 

plan

6 Does plan include documentation (e.g., attached approval 

letter) for system modifications that have been approved since 

last ANP approval?

See Appendix D for El Camino Watt 

modification

7 NCore site operational (by 1/1/2011) 58.10 (a)(3) Already in operation, purpose listed in Table 

2-1

8 Pb site for 0.5-1.0 tpy sources operational (by 12/27/2011) 58.10 (a)(4) No Pb site 0.5-1.0 needed; noted in Table 3-

2

9 NO2 plan for area-wide and RA40 sites submitted by 7/1/2012 58.10 (a)(5) No RA40 sites needed, NO2 area-wide site 

noted in Table 3-2

10 NO2 area-wide and RA40 sites operational by 1/1/2013 58.10 (a)(5) Yes, by 2014, noted in Section 4

11 NO2 plan for near-road sites submitted by 7/1/2013 58.10 (a)(5) Appendix C

12 SO2 sites operational (by 1/1/2013) 58.10 (a)(6) and 58.13(d) SO2 monitor at DPM serves both SO2 

monitoring and NCore requirement, noted in 

table 3-2

13 AQS site identification number for each site 58.10 (b)(1) Appendix B

14 Location of each site: street address and geographic 

coordinates

58.10 (b)(2) Appendix B

15 Sampling and analysis method(s) for each measured 

parameter

58.10 (b)(3) Appendix B

16 Any proposals to remove or move a monitoring station within a 

period of 18 months following plan submittal

58.10 (b)(5) Section 4

17 Scale of representativeness for each monitor as defined in 

Appendix D

58.10(b)(6); App D Table 2-3

18 Identification of sites suitable and sites not suitable for 

comparison to the annual PM2.5 NAAQS as described in Part 

58.30

58.10 (b)(7) Listed individually in Appendix B
ANP requirement Citation within 40 CFR 58 Notes [Checked by SMAQMD for 2013 Plan]

19 MSA, CBSA, CSA or other area represented by the monitor 58.10 (b)(8) Section 3, paragraph 2; and also individually 

by site in Appendix B

20 Designation of any Pb monitors as either source-oriented or 

non-source-oriented

58.10 (b)(9) Table 3-2

21 Any source-oriented Pb site for which a waiver has been 

granted by EPA RA

58.10 (b)(10) N/A

22 Any Pb monitor for which a waiver has been requested or 

granted by EPA RA for us of Pb-PM10 in lieu of Pb-TSP

58.10 (b)(11) Wavier not required for Pb-PM10 monitor 

because it is located at NCore site per 

Appendix D to 40 CFR 58

23 Identification of required NO2 monitors as either near-road or 

area-wide

58.10 (b)(12) Identified in Table 3-2

24 Identification of any PM2.5 FEMs and/or ARMs not eligible to 

be compared to the NAAQS (Note 1: must include required 

data assessment.) (Note 2: Required SLAMS must monitor 

PM2.5 with NAAQS-comparable monitor at the required 

sample frequency.)

58.10 (b)(13), 58.11 (e) Section 4 identifies Folsom-Natoma 

BAM1020 FEM as not eligible for comparison 

to NAAQS; it is a SPM and non-regulatory 

monitor type is requested

25 For SPMs listed as non-regulatory, note the start Date of 

FRM/FEM/ARM at SPM. If > 24 months, and monitor is 

eligible for comparison to the NAAQS per 58.11 (e) and 58.30, 

the agency must supply information that App A, C or E 

requirements were not met.

58.20(c) Noted for all SPM monitors in Appendix B

26 Document how states and local agencies provide for the 

review of changes to a PM2.5 monitoring network that impact 

the location of a violating PM2.5 monitor.

58.10 (c) Section 6

27 Does the plan include a request for approval for and alternative 

to appendix A requirements for SPMs operating a 

FRM/FEM/ARM which also meets appendix E?

58.11 (a) (2) N/A

28 Precision/Accuracy reports submitted to AQS 58.16(a); App A, 1.3 and 

5.1.1

Section 7

29 Annual data certification submitted 58.15, App. A 1.3 Section 7

30 Frequency of flow rate verification for manual PM samplers 

audit

App A 3.3.2 Appendix B

31 Frequency of flow rate verification for automated PM analyzers 

audit

App A 3.2.3 Appendix B
ANP requirement Citation within 40 CFR 58 Notes [Checked by SMAQMD for 2013 Plan]

32 Frequency of one-point flow rate verification for Pb samplers 

audit

App A 3.3.4.1 Appendix B

33 Frequency of one-point QC check (gaseous) App. A 3.2.1 Appendix B

34 Date of last Annual Performance Evaluation (gaseous) App. A 3.2.2 Appendix B

35 Dates of last two semi-annual flow rate audits for PM monitors App A, 3.2.4 and 3.3.3 Appendix B

36 Dates of last two semi-annual flow rate audits for Pb monitors App A 3.3.4.1 Appendix B

37 PM2.5 co-location App A 3.2.5 Section 5

38 Designation of a primary monitor if there is more than one 

monitor for a pollutant at a site.

Need to determine 

collocation

Appendix B, where there is collocation

39 Distance between co-located monitors (Note: waiver request or 

the date of previous waiver approval must be included if the 

distance deviates from requirement.) 

App. A 3.2.5.6 and 3.2.6.3 Appendix B, where there is collocation; no 

waiver requested

40 Manual PM10 method co-location met? (note: continuous 

PM10 does not have this requirement)

App A 3.3.1 Section 5

41 Pb co-location App A 3.3.4.3 Section 5

42 PM10-2.5 co-location (note: only applies to Fresno and 

Phoenix NCore sites)

App A 3.3.6 Section 5

43 Instrument/monitoring method code for each monitor: is it 

reported properly? Is it reported correctly (i.e., appropriate 

method code for regulatory monitors)?

App C 2.4.1.2 Appendix B

44 For agencies that share monitoring responsibilities in an 

MSA/CSA: does each affected State or local agency meet full 

monitoring requirements or is an agreement between the 

affected agencies and the EPA Regional Administrator in 

place?

App D 2(e) Enough monitors to meet full requirement

45 Start date for each monitor Required to determine if 

other req. (e.g., min # and 

co-lo) are met

Appendix B

46 Instrument monitor type for each monitor Required to determine if 

other req. (e.g., min # and 

co-lo) are met

Simplified verion in table 2-1, detailed version 

in Appendix B

47 Monitoring objective for each instrument App D 1.1, 58.10 (b)(6) Table 2-2, and in Appendix B
ANP requirement Citation within 40 CFR 58 Notes [Checked by SMAQMD for 2013 Plan]

48 Site type for each instrument App D 1.1.1 Table 2-3

49 Instrument parameter code for each instrument Required to determine if 

other req. (e.g., min # and 

co-lo) are met

Appendix B

50 Instrument parameter occurrence code for each instrument Required to determine if 

other req. (e.g., min # and 

co-lo) are met

Appendix B

51 Sampling season for ozone (note: date of waiver approval 

must be included if the sampling season deviates from 

requirement)

58.10 (b)(4), App D, 4.1(i) Year-round sampling season, noted in 

Section 3

52 Sampling schedule for PM2.5 - applies to year-round and 

seasonal sampling schedules (note: date of waiver approval 

must be included if the sampling season deviates from 

requirement) 

58.10 (b)(4), 58.12(d), App 

D 4.7, EPA flowchart

53 Sampling schedule for PM10 58.10 (b)(4), 58.12(e), App 

D 4.6

54 Sampling schedule for Pb 58.10 (b)(4), 58.12(b), App 

D 4.5

55 Sampling schedule for PM10-2.5 58.10 (b)(4), 58.12(f), App 

D 4.8

56 Minimum # of monitors for O3[Note: should be supported by 

MSA ID, MSA population, DV, # monitors, and # required 

monitors] (see footnote) 

App D, 4.1(a) and Table D2Table 3-1

57 Identification of max. conc. O3 monitor(s) App D 4.1 (b) Table 3-1

58 Minimum monitoring requirements met for near-road NO2 

(2014 start date)

App D 4.3.2 Section 4, under Sacramento-Bercut Dr.

59 Minimum monitoring requirements met for area-wide NO2 App D 4.3.3 Table 3-2

60 Minimum monitoring requirements met for RA-40 NO2 App D 4.3.4 N/A

61 Minimum monitoring requirements met for SO2 [Note: Only 

monitors considered to be required SLAMs are eligible to be 

counted towards meeting minimum monitoring requirements.]

App D 4.4 Table 3-2

Sampling schedule note in Table 3-4, 

sampling season is year round, as noted in 

Section 3
ANP requirement Citation within 40 CFR 58 Notes [Checked by SMAQMD for 2013 Plan]

62 Minimum monitoring requirements met for Pb [Note: Only 

monitors considered to be required SLAMs are eligible to be 

counted towards meeting minimum monitoring requirements.]

App D 4.5 58.13(a) Table 3-2

63 Minimum # of monitors for PM2.5 [Note 1: should be supported 

by MSA ID, MSA population, DV, # monitors, and # required 

monitors] [Note 2: Only monitors considered to be required 

SLAMs are eligible to be counted towards meeting minimum 

monitoring requirements.]

App D, 4.7.1(a) and Table 

D-5

Table 3-1

64 Optional PM2.5 Network Clarifications: Provide a list of 

required sites if it does not include all SLAMS. [Note: default 

will assume all SLAMS are considered required sites.]

Need to assess several 

requirements

N/A

65 Required PM2.5 sites represent area-wide air quality App D 4.7.1(b) Yes, as denoted by the spatial scale in Table 

2-3

66 For PM2.5, is at least one site at neighborhood or larger scale 

in an area of expected maximum concentration

App D 4.7.1(b)(1) Yes, see Table 2-3

67 If additional SLAMS PM2.5 required, is there a site in an area 

of poor air quality

App D 4.7.1(b)(2) No additional PM2.5 sites are required

68 Minimum monitoring requirements for continuous PM2.5 App D 4.7.2 Table 3-1

69 Requirements for PM2.5 background and transport sites App D 4.7.3 Yes (Bruceville)

70 Are PM2.5 Chemical Speciation requirements met for official 

STN sites?

App D 4.7.4 Yes, by the speciation sampler at 

Sacramento-Del Paso Manor, see Table 2-1

71 Minimum # of monitors for PM10 App D, 4.6 (a) and Table D4 Table 3-1

72 Minimum monitoring requirements met for PM10-2.5 mass App D 4.8 Yes, see Table 3-1

73 Distance of site from nearest road App E 6 Appendix B

74 Traffic count of nearest road App E Appendix B

75 Groundcover App E 3(a) Appendix B

76 Probe height App E 2 Appendix B

77 Distance from supporting structure App E 2 Appendix B

78 Distance from obstructions on roof App E 4(b) Appendix B
ANP requirement Citation within 40 CFR 58 Notes [Checked by SMAQMD for 2013 Plan]

79 Distance from obstructions not on roof App E 4(a) Appendix B

80 Distance from trees App E 5 Appendix B

81 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue App E 3(b) Appendix B

82 Unrestricted airflow App E, 4(a) and 4(b) Appendix B

83 Probe material (if applicable) App E 9 Appendix B

84 Residence time (if applicable) App E 9 Appendix B