8762 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices 

1On January 8, 2020, Commerce determined that 

Wor-Biz Industrial Product Co., Ltd. (Anhui) is the 

successor-in-interest to Wor-Biz Trading Co., Ltd. 

(Anhui) and is therefore entitled to that company’s 

cash deposit rate with respect to entries of subject 

merchandise. See Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings from 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review, 85 FR 881 (January 

8, 2020). 

LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT

ASSISTANCE—Continued 

[1/15/2021 through 1/26/2021] 

Firm name Firm address 

Date accepted 

for 

investigation 

Product(s) 

Liberty Industries Investments, LLC d/b/a 

Liberty Trailers.

130 East Cemetery Road, Fillmore, IN 

46128.

1/26/2021 The firm manufactures utility trailers and 

flatbed trailers. 

Any party having a substantial 

interest in these proceedings may 

request a public hearing on the matter. 

A written request for a hearing must be 

submitted to the Trade Adjustment 

Assistance Division, Room 71030, 

Economic Development Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten 

(10) calendar days following publication 

of this notice. These petitions are 

received pursuant to section 251 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Please follow the requirements set 

forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 

315.9 for procedures to request a public 

hearing. The Catalog of Federal 

Domestic Assistance official number 

and title for the program under which 

these petitions are submitted is 11.313, 

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. 

Bryan Borlik, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2021–02654 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–06–2021] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 240—Martinsburg, 

West Virginia; Application for 

Reorganization Under Alternative Site 

Framework 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by 

the West Virginia Economic 

Development Authority, grantee of FTZ 

240, requesting authority to reorganize 

the zone under the alternative site 

framework (ASF) adopted by the FTZ 

Board (15 CFR Sec. 400.2(c)). The ASF 

is an option for grantees for the 

establishment or reorganization of zones 

and can permit significantly greater 

flexibility in the designation of new 

subzones or ‘‘usage-driven’’ FTZ sites 

for operators/users located within a 

grantee’s ‘‘service area’’ in the context of 

the FTZ Board’s standard 2,000-acre 

activation limit for a zone. The 

application was submitted pursuant to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the 

regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 

400). It was formally docketed on 

February 4, 2021. 

FTZ 240 was approved by the FTZ 

Board on February 7, 2000 (Board Order 

1071, 65 FR 8119, February 17, 2000). 

The current zone includes the following 

site: Site 1 (317 acres)—Eastern West 

Virginia Regional Airport complex, 170 

Aviation Way, Martinsburg. 

The grantee’s proposed service area 

under the ASF would be Berkley, 

Hampshire, Hardy, Jefferson and 

Morgan Counties, West Virginia, as 

described in the application. If 

approved, the grantee would be able to 

serve sites throughout the service area 

based on companies’ needs for FTZ 

designation. The application indicates 

that the proposed service area is within 

and adjacent to the Front Royal, Virginia 

Customs and Border Protection port of 

entry. 

The applicant is requesting authority 

to reorganize its existing zone to include 

the existing site as a ‘‘magnet’’ site. The 

ASF allows for the possible exemption 

of one magnet site from the ‘‘sunset’’ 

time limits that generally apply to sites 

under the ASF, and the applicant 

proposes that Site 1 be so exempted. No 

subzones/usage-driven sites are being 

requested at this time. 

In accordance with the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, Christopher Kemp of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

evaluate and analyze the facts and 

information presented in the application 

and case record and to report findings 

and recommendations to the FTZ Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive 

Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The 

closing period for their receipt is April 

12, 2021. Rebuttal comments in 

response to material submitted during 

the foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period to 

April 26, 2021. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ 

Board’s website, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. For further 

information, contact Christopher Kemp 

at Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov. 

Dated: February 4, 2021. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–02640 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–062] 

Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Wor-Biz 

Industrial Product Co., Ltd. (Anhui) 

(Wor-Biz) 1 has made sales of cast iron 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices 8763 

2See Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 2018–2019, 85 FR 37832 

(June 24, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and the 

accompanying preliminary decision memorandum. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum: Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings from the 

People’s Republic of China; 2018–2019,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, the 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings 

from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated December 18, 2020. 

6See Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings from the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order, 83 FR 44570 (August 31, 2018) (the 

Order). 

7See Longkou Haimeng Mach. Co. v. United 

States, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 1357–60 (CIT 2008) 

(affirming Commerce’s determination to assign a 

4.22 percent dumping margin to the separate rate 

respondents in a segment where the three 

mandatory respondents received dumping margins 

of 4.22 percent, 0.03 percent, and zero percent, 

respectively); see also Certain Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 74 FR 36656, 36660 (July 24, 2009). 

soil pipe fittings (soil pipe fittings) from 

the People’s Republic of China (China) 

at prices below normal value during the 

period of review (POR) February 20, 

2018, through July 31, 2019. We also 

determine that Qinshui Shunsida 

Casting Co., Ltd. (Shunshida) is not 

eligible for a separate rate and is, 

therefore, part of the China-wide entity. 

DATES: Applicable February 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samantha Kinney, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

202–482–2285. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of the administrative review on 

June 24, 2020.2 For the events that 

occurred since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.3 Commerce 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all 

deadlines in administrative reviews by 

60 days.4 On December 18, 2020, 

Commerce extended the deadline for the 

final results of this review.5 The revised 

deadline for the final results of this 

review is now June 21, 2021. 

Scope of the Order 6

The product covered by the Order is 

soil pipe fittings from China. A full 

description of the scope of the order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of these issues is 

in the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and electronic version of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Changes From the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, Commerce made no 

revisions to the calculations of the rates 

assigned to Wor-Biz and the nonexamined separate rate respondents. 

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that Dalian Lino F.T.Z. Co., 

Ltd., Dalian Metal I/E Co., Ltd., Dinggin 

Hardware (Dalian) Co., Ltd., and 

Shijiazhuang Asia Casting Co., Ltd., 

which were not selected for individual 

review, demonstrated their eligibility for 

separate rates, and we continue to do so 

in these final results. 

Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate 

Respondents 

The statute and our regulations do not 

address the establishment of a rate to be 

assigned to respondents not selected for 

individual examination when we limit 

our examination of companies subject to 

the administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act. 

Generally, we look to section 735(c)(5) 

of the Act, which provides instructions 

for calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for respondents not 

individually examined in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ Accordingly, 

Commerce’s usual practice in 

determining the rate for separate rate 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination, has been to average the 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the selected companies, excluding rates 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available.7 However, 

when the weighted-average dumping 

margins established for all individually 

investigated respondents are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on adverse 

facts available (AFA), section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act permits 

Commerce to ‘‘use any reasonable 

method to establish the estimated allothers rate for exporters and producers 

not individually investigated, including 

averaging the estimated weighted 

average dumping margins determined 

for the exporters and producers 

individually investigated.’’ 

For the final results of this review, 

Wor-Biz is the only individually 

examined respondent that received a 

weighted-average dumping margin that 

is neither de minimis nor based entirely 

on AFA. Therefore, we have assigned 

Wor-Biz’s margin to all eligible nonselected separate rate respondents. 

The China-Wide Entity 

Commerce considers all companies 

for which a review was requested and 

which did not demonstrate separate rate 

eligibility to be part of the China-wide 

entity. For the final results of this 

administrative review, we consider six 

companies to be part of the China-wide 

entity: Golden Orange International 

Ltd., Hebei Metals & Engineering 

Products Trading Co., Ltd., Qinshui 

Shunshida Casting Co., Ltd., Richang 

Qiaoshan Trade Co., Ltd., Shanxi 

Zhongrui Tianyue Trading Co., Ltd., and 

Yangcheng Country Huawant Universal. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

For the companies subject to this 

administrative review, including the 

companies that established their 

eligibility for a separate rate, Commerce 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period February 20, 2018, through July 

31, 2019: 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Wor-Biz Industrial Product Co., Ltd. 

(Anhui) ................................................ 18.16 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review Receiving a Separate Rate: 

Dalian Lino F.T.Z. Co., Ltd ................ 18.16 

Dalian Metal I/E Co., Ltd .................... 18.16 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
8764 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices 

8See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

1See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order: 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India, 69 FR 

77995 (December 29, 2004) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 85 

FR 61928 (October 1, 2020). 

3See Sun’s Letter, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 

from the Republic of India: Notice of Intent to 

Participate In 3rd Sunset Review of Countervailing 

Duty Order,’’ dated October 9, 2020. 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Dinggin Hardware (Dalian) Co., Ltd ... 18.16 

Shijiazhuang Asia Casting Co., Ltd ... 18.16 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce will disclose to 

the parties in a proceeding the 

calculations performed in connection 

with a final results of review within five 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of final results in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). However, here, Commerce 

made no adjustments to the margin 

calculation methodology used in the 

Preliminary Results, therefore there are 

no calculations to disclose for the final 

results. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

administrative review. Consistent with 

its recent notice,8 Commerce intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For entries that were not reported in 

the U.S. sales database submitted by 

Wor-Biz during this review, and for the 

companies that did not qualify for a 

separate rate in this review, Commerce 

will instruct CBP to liquidate such 

entries at the China-wide rate (i.e., 

360.30 percent). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by 

sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

companies listed above which have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that for the China-wide entity; and 

(4) for all non-Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 29, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Whether to Average Surrogate 

Values for Financial Ratios 

5. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–02597 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–839] 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From 

India: Final Results of the Expedited 

Third Five-Year Sunset Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) 

from India would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable February 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 29, 2004, Commerce 

published its CVD order on CVP 23 from 

India in the Federal Register.1 On 

October 1, 2020, Commerce published 

the notice of initiation of the third 

sunset review of the Order, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).2 Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

from Sun Chemical Corporation 

(domestic interested party or Sun), 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Sun claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic 

producer of CVP 23 in the United States. 

Commerce received a substantive 

response from the domestic interested 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES