alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

FAA - 2011 - 1453 

### Docket Number

2009 - SW -46 -AD 

### Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained

in the Supplemental AD Docket Agusta Alert B ollettino Tecnico (ABT) No. 109S - 5, dated July 26, 2006; ABT No. 109EP - 70, dated July 27, 2006; ABT No. 109K - 47, dated July 27, 2006; ABT No. 109 - 122, dated July 27, 2006; and ABT No. 119 - 15, dated July 27, 2006.



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
204.7304 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( a ) Use the provision at 252.204-7008, Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls, in all solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, except for solicitations solely for the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items.
( b ) Use the clause at 252.204-7009, Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Third-Party Contractor Reported Cyber Incident Information, in all solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for services that include support for the Government's activities related to safeguarding covered defense information and cyber incident reporting.
( c ) Use the clause at 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, in all solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, except for solicitations and contracts solely for the acquisition of COTS items.
( d ) Use the provision at 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements, in all solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, except for solicitations solely for the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items.
( e ) Use the clause at 252.204-7020, NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements, in all solicitations and contracts, task orders, or delivery orders, including those using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, except for those that are solely for the acquisition of COTS items.
[80 FR 51743, Aug. 26, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 56929, Sept. 21, 2015; 81 FR 72999, Oct. 21, 2016; 82 FR 61480, Dec. 28, 2017; 85 FR 61519, Sept. 29, 2020; 88 FR 6581, Jan. 31, 2023]
#### 246.710-70 Warranty attachments.

Follow the procedures at PGI 246.710-70 regarding warranty attachments.

[81 FR 17043, Mar. 25, 2016]
SERVED MARCH 1,2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - CD^pjf,|P[\jJ QF 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ^''^'K'^PHR^ATiON 

WASHINGTON, DC 'V !':^''"nFi-R'-\T!QNS 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2010-0980 

NOTICE QF HEARING DATES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and 

considered on May 24,2011, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court, Room 7006, Casey U.S. 

Courthouse, 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston, Texas 77002. Hearings will commence at 

9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse 

on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s) ^ Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service . 

SO ORDERED. 

Lichard C. GoodwiT 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

' Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available 

for viewing at http://www. regulations, gov. 

^ The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as 

well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc400/civil_penalty/; see 

also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gOv/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Titlel4/14tab_02.tpl. In 

addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions 

are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database). For additional 

information, see the Web site. 

1 
V&imtl Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, A 

Wilbur Wright BuildingThomas Newton Boiling, Respondent'sfli 

Mai»ging Attomey, Regulatory Affeirsi 

ContJneatal Airlines, Inc.,/?e*ponrfew/ ! 

1600 Smith Street, 15* Floor HQSLG I ^ 

Houi^cm, TX 77002 

TEL: 713-324-5131 I- f« 

FAX- 713-324-5160 i J 

1 f»Tt 

Tim Pii£^ Complainant's Counsel 

Aitomey^ Office of Regional Counsel, 

Soutiiwest Region 

Fe<J|(3»l,^yiation Administration | ^.^^-^^-^ 

2604 IMfcawham Blvd. ;. ^ ^ 

Ft. Wdtth,TX 76193-0007 ^ ^ -^ 

TEL 817-222-5099 . -^ 

FAX 817-222-5945/5092 '-' 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

U.S. DqKirtment of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. I >! 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room £1 

WasUaogton, D.C. 20590 ; 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202- 366-21^ 

L ^ Assistant 202-366-5121 '• 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

w-"".|^: 5^' 

u •-'.'•d 

v.-

'?•' 

1 _ 

' Sen*^||iiasbyU.S,Mail. R)rserviceip| 

Avia^iyininistration, 600' 

DC 20391, Attention: Hearing Dodtet 

*
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# \2tff) ll-E-170 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:10 AM

Sheet 210 of 264P. 2

EMSI G Vf'iZ'V9 i«:w »

From : Date : Contact : Company : 

### Fax=518828002 6 rtBt»»<»iu*«* « raa M r « v Ju l 2 3 '9 8 11=3 6 P . 0 2



### A 9 4 5 2

Contac tRepor t Melani e Proctor

, Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) Jul y 20,199 8 Mr . Timoth

y Haskins , Directo r o f

Regulator

y A£fa i Emsi g Manufacturin

g Corporatio

n Telephon e Number : (518 ) 828-730 1 Fa x Number : (518 ) 828-002 6
Contac tSummary : Mr . Haskin s wa s concerne

d abou tth e placemen

to f Emsig' s processe s i n th e EPA' s plasti c composite s maximu m achievabl e contro

l technology database . Base d o n Mr . Haskin s request , Ms . Proctor senthi m a cop y ofth e EPA' s plasti c composite s proces s descriptions . Afte r reviewin g an

d discussin g th

e plasti c composite s proces s description s wit h Ms . Proctor , Mr . Haskin s determine d tha tEmsig' s sheetcastin g proces s wa s bes tgroupe d with centrifuga l castin g operations , ro

d castin g wa s bes tgroupe d wit h polyme r casting , an

d thei r moldin g operatio n wa

s bes tgroupe

d wit h compressio n molding . Mr . Haskins explained tha

tthei r averag

e weighte d hazardou

s ai r pollutant(HAP ) conten t o f thei r nea tresi n used fo r sheetcastin g i s 36. 4 pereen t(includin g an

y HAP adde

d t o th e nea

t resin) . Accordin g t o Mr

. Haskins , Emsi g use d SSS tons ofresi n fo r shee tcasting , 68 0 ton s o f resi n for ro d casting , an

d 14 5 ton s o f resin fo r moldin g i n 1997 .
INFORMATION , I S ACCURATEEMSI G P. 3 Fax:518828002 5 Ju l 2 5 *y8 11:5 b KU 1


### 518/828-730 1 EMSIG MANUFACTURIN G CORP . Secon d Street Extensio n Hudson , Ne

w Yor k 12534 Fa x 518/828-^i W

FA X MESSAC

E SHEE T

TO : FROM: 

# /VsAci<*<£-
*** flm*xj(U^#i
NO . O F SHEET S (inc. thi s page ) 

# A.

COMMENTS :



### I F YO U DI D NO

T RECEIV

E AL L PAGES , PLEAS

E NOTIF Y U S A T ONCE .



# 2 ~
- Current Low-Income Levels  
Prior-Year Low-Income Levels
    
A Profile of the Federal TRIO Programs and Child Care Access Means Parents in School Program:  2008 MS Word (446K) | PDF (267K)
  
Program Profiles and Reports
-  o	Fast Facts Report for the Educational Opportunity Centers Programs: 2018-19A Report on the Educational Opportunity Centers Program: 2007-08, With Select Comparative Data, 2002-07  MS Word (495K) | PDF (727K)
An Interim Report on the Educational Opportunity Centers Program: 2002-03 and 2003-04, With Select Data From 2000-02  MS Word (1.62MB) | PDF (726K)
A Profile of EOC: 1999-00 PDF (266K)
A Profile of EOC: 1998-99 PDF (408K)
Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) Applicant and Grantee Resources

TRIO Home
  Last Modified: 06/09/2022
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

t0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148606

COUNTY OF BAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 148606

COA: 307447 

Bay CC: 09-003940-CL

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30935

consolidated with

No. 01-31405

TERRY ZAFFUTO; SUSAN ZAFFUTO,

Plaintiffs - Appellees-Cross-Appellants

versus

CITY OF HAMMOND; ET AL, 

 

 Defendants

CITY OF HAMMOND,

Defendants - Appellants-Cross-Appellees;

KENNY CORKERN,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

 November 18, 2002

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Because the underlying opinion, Zaffuto v. City of Hammond, 308

F.3d 485 (5th Cir. 2002), reverses in part and remands for a new

trial, the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to plaintiffs

is VACATED. On remand, the district court shall, at the appropriate

time, re-determine whether and to what extent the plaintiffs are

entitled to attorney’s fees.
In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
# C_2017039EN.01000202.xml

| 7.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8338 — Apax Partners/Unilabs)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 39/04)

On 25 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8338. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8338. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 317.105 Policy.
#### 3052.219-71 DHS mentor-protégé program.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3019.708-70(a), insert the following clause:

# DHS Mentor-Protégé Program (JUN 2006)

(a) Large businesses are encouraged to participate in the DHS Mentor-Protégé program for the purpose of providing developmental assistance to eligible small business protégé entities to enhance their capabilities and increase their participation in DHS contracts.

(b) The program consists of:

(1) Mentor firms, which are large prime contractors capable of providing developmental assistance;

(2) Protégé firms, which are small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, HUBZone small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, and women-owned small business concerns; and

(3) Mentor-Protégé agreements, approved by the DHS OSDBU.

(c) Mentor participation in the program means providing business developmental assistance to aid Protégés in developing the requisite expertise to effectively compete for and successfully perform DHS contracts and subcontracts.

(d) Large business prime contractors serving as mentors in the DHS Mentor-Protégé program are eligible for a post-award incentive for subcontracting plan credit. The mentor may receive credit for costs it incurs to provide assistance to a protégé firm. The mentor may use this additional credit towards attaining its subcontracting plan participation goal under the same or another DHS contract. The amount of credit given to a mentor firm for these protégé developmental assistance costs shall be calculated on a dollar for dollar basis and reported in the Summary Subcontract Report via the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) at *http://www.esrs.gov.* For example, a mentor/large business prime contractor would report a $10,000 subcontract to the protégé/small business subcontractor and $5,000 of developmental assistance to the protégé/small business subcontractor as $15,000. The Mentor and Protégé will submit a signed joint statement agreeing on the dollar value of the developmental assistance and the Summary Subcontract Report.

(e) Contractors interested in participating in the program are encouraged to contact the DHS OSDBU for more information.

(End of clause)

[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 25775, May 2, 2006;
86 FR 17317, Apr. 2, 2021]
Exhibit
32.1








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF


AMEREN
CORPORATION


(required
by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)








In
connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2008 of Ameren Corporation (the “Registrant”) as filed by the Registrant
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q”), each undersigned officer of the Registrant does hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.










Date:  May 8,
2008










/s/ Gary L.
Rainwater


Gary L.
Rainwater


Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)











/s/ Warner L.
Baxter


Warner L.
Baxter


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 192 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration entitled ‘‘Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; 

Automatic Emergency Braking Systems for Light Vehicles’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2024 

Mr. PALMER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration entitled ‘‘Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Automatic Emergency Braking Systems for Light Vehicles’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Na4 tional Highway Traffic Safety Administration entitled 

5 ‘‘Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Automatic 

6 Emergency Braking Systems for Light Vehicles’’ (89 Fed. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 192 IH 

1 Reg. 39686; published May 9, 2024), and such rule shall 

2 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERRENCE J. PECK,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Commissioner

Social Security Administration,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-17777

D.C. No. 3:04-cv-02283-FJM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 12, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: HUG, RYMER and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

FILED

MAY 14 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 We are concerned about the appellant’s briefing in this case. The first 1

version of the opening brief that was filed was fatally deficient, as were the next

two. The hard copy of the fourth was the brief filed in a separate case which failed

to track this case at all. Filing non-compliant briefs is unacceptable. Counsel are

admonished to review the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and to adhere

scrupulously to their requirements.

Terrence J. Peck appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for

attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C.

§ 2412(d)(1)(A). We affirm. 1

The district court’s decision was not based on an erroneous conclusion of

law, or without rational basis in the record, as Peck maintains. The fact that Peck

prevailed raises no presumption that the government’s position was not

substantially justified. Kali v. Bowen, 854 F.2d 329, 334 (9th Cir. 1988). Rather,

for reasons the district court explained, the ALJ’s rejection of Dr. Soscia’s opinion

and discounting of Peck’s subjective complaints, and the government’s defense of

the ALJ’s decision, were based in the record even though this court ultimately

disagreed with the ALJ’s assessment. See Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 569

(1988). The cases upon which Peck relies are distinguishable in that the ALJ here

did not fail to do anything that he was supposed to do. Cf. Shafer v. Astrue, 518

F.3d 1067, 1072 (9th Cir. 2008); Gutierrez v. Barnhart, 274 F.3d 1255, 1257 (9th

Cir. 2001). The district court did not err in determining that the government’s
position was substantially justified. Accordingly, it did not abuse its discretion in

denying Peck’s motion for attorney’s fees.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29797]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Institute of Museum and Library Services

Sunshine Act Meeting of the National Museum and Library Services 
Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Museum and Library Services Board, which advises 
the Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services in 
awarding national awards and medals, will meet by teleconference on 
February 23, 2015, to review nominations for the 2015 National Medal 
for Museum and Library Service.

DATE AND TIME: Monday, February 23, 2015, at 1 p.m. EST.

PLACE: The meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the 
Institute of Museum and Library Services. 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor, 
Washington, DC, 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676.

STATUS: Closed. The meeting will be closed pursuant to subsections 
(c)(4) and (c)(9) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code 
because the Board will consider information that may disclose: Trade 
secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person 
and privileged or confidential; and information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Maas, Program Specialist, 
Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4798.

    Signed: December 16, 2014.
Andrew Christopher,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-29797 Filed 12-17-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2009