alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CENTEX CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Timothy R. Eller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ TIMOTHY R. ELLERTimothy R. EllerChief Executive OfficerDate: August 5, 2004
# C_2019206EN.01000101.xml

| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 206/01)

Last publication

OJ C 187, 3.6.2019

Past publications

OJ C 182, 27.5.2019

OJ C 172, 20.5.2019

OJ C 164, 13.5.2019

OJ C 155, 6.5.2019

OJ C 148, 29.4.2019

OJ C 139, 15.4.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 183 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 183

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the Department of Energy relating to 
   ``Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for 
                          Circulator Pumps''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2024

Mr. Palmer submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the Department of Energy relating to 
   ``Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for 
                          Circulator Pumps''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
final rule submitted by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable 
Energy of the Department of Energy relating to ``Energy Conservation 
Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Circulator Pumps'' (89 Fed. 
Reg. 44464 (May 20, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT31.1****Certifications**I, Timothy R. Eller, certify that:1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Centex Corporation;2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] andinternal control over financial reporting [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)] for the registrant and have:(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)     Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:August 2, 2006/s/ TIMOTHY R. ELLER
Exhibit 10.40



October 20, 2004



Mr. Jerrold A. Glass

9491 Harrowhill Lane

Burke, VA 22015



Dear Jerry:



As you know, US
Airways, Inc. (the Company) is in the process of implementing its Transformation Plan, which will enable it to compete effectively against the competition, including the increasing number of Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs). A major
portion of the Transformation Plan involves reductions in the Companys employee costs, which means changes in the compensation benefits of all employees, including officers. Specifically, pursuant to the management cost reductions announced on
October 4, 2004:



| | 1. |  | effective October 11, 2004, your salary will be reduced by 10%;
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | effective October 11, 2004, the amount contributed to your retirement plan will be reduced by 25%;
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. |  | effective January 1, 2005, the current system for sick and vacation days will be replaced by a Paid Time Off (PTO) system, under which you will be entitled to twenty-five (25) PTO
days and eight (8) holidays;
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. |  | under the new PTO system, the eight holidays will be New Years Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and two floating holidays; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. |  | Section 6 of the Agreement will be applied according to your salary of record prior to reduction.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By your signature below, you agree that (a) the changes identified in items 1-5 above will not, either separately or in the
aggregate, constitute Good Reason, as that term is defined in the Severance Agreement entered into as of April 8, 2002 between you and the Company, and as subsequently amended as of March 31, 2003 (the Agreement); (b) the
changes identified in items 1-5 do not constitute a breach of the Agreement; and (c) as of the date of this letter, Good Reason does not presently exist with respect to you due to the changes identified in items 1-4 above.



---

Mr. Jerrold A. Glass

Page 2

October 20, 2004



This letter will be deemed to constitute a written amendment to your Agreement.



Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing and dating this letter in the spaces provided below and
returning it to me.



Sincerely,Elizabeth K. Lanier




|                           
|---------------------------
|AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED THIS
|DATE OF OCTOBER, 2004      
|                           
|                           
|Jerrold A. Glass
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

Grant funds, awarded under the **IDEA**, are appropriated by Congress and are intended to support early intervention and special education services for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities and their families. 

The IDEA Part B formula grant programs (Sections **611** and **619**) assist states in providing a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment for children with disabilities ages 3 through 21. 

The IDEA **Part C grant program** supports early intervention services for infants and toddlers birth through age two and their families.

Information on these grant programs may be accessed through the following link.
                  - www2.ed.gov/fund/data/award/idea/

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 227.7008 Settlement of indemnified claims.

Settlement of claims involving payment for past infringement shall not be made without the consent of, and equitable contribution by, each indemnifying contractor involved, unless such settlement is determined to be in the best interests of the Government and is coordinated with the Department of Justice with a view to preserving any rights of the Government against the contractors involved. If consent of and equitable contribution by the contractors are obtained, the settlement need not be coordinated with the Department of Justice.
EXHIBIT 18.4

LETTER RE:  CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE



Southwestern  Electric  Power Company  (SWEPCO)
Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended March 31, 1999


Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the  requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a  registrant's  independent  accountants  whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

As stated in Note 1 to the  financial  statements  of this Form 10-Q,  effective
January 1, 1999, SWEPCO incorporated the five-year average market related method
(the "Market  Method") in its calculation of pension costs.  Prior to January 1,
1999,  SWEPCO  utilized the market value of the pension assets at September 30th
in its  calculation of pension  costs.  The change was made to minimize the plan
asset  market  value  volatility  effect on  SWEPCO's  recorded  pension  costs.
Adopting  the  Market  Method did not have a  material  effect on first  quarter
results of  operations  or  financial  position.  The  cumulative  effect of the
accounting change to the Market Method was not material to first quarter results
of operations or financial position.

A complete  coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the  preferability  of  accounting   principles  among  acceptable   alternative
principles  has not been  established  by the  accounting  profession.  Thus, we
cannot  make an  objective  determination  of whether  the change in  accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors,  including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective  basis,  and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion  that  SWEPCO's  change in method of  accounting  is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which based upon the reasons stated
for the  change  and our  discussions  with  you is also  preferable  under  the
circumstances  in this  particular  case. In arriving at this  opinion,  we have
relied on the business  judgement and business  planning of your management.  We
have not audited the  application  of the change to the financial  statements of
any period subsequent to December 31, 1998. Further, we have not examined and do
not express any opinion with respect to your financial  statements for the three
months ended March 31, 1999.


Very Truly Yours

Arthur Andersen LLP
#### 311.7102 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.211-1, Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities, in solicitations, contracts, and orders requiring the contractor to conduct events in accordance with 311.7100(b).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.31

                                  BIOGEN, INC.
                  VOLUNTARY EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN

                                SECOND AMENDMENT


         The Biogen, Inc. Voluntary Executive Supplemental Savings Plan, as
heretofore amended, is hereby further amended effective as of January 1, 1998,
as follows:

         1. Section 4.1(a) is amended by deleting the number "25%" and by
         inserting in its place the number "50%".

         2. Section 5.1(c) is amended by (a) deleting the words "mutual fund"
         and "mutual funds" in each place they occur and substituting in their
         place the words "investment fund" and "investment funds" respectively,
         and (b) deleting the parenthetical phrase at the end of the first
         paragraph thereby allowing participants to chose the Biogen stock fund
         as an investment option.


                                           BIOGEN, INC.

Date: March 11, 1998                       By:______________________________
                                              Frank A. Burke, Jr.
                                              Vice President - Human Resources
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 138

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services relating to ``Clarifying the Eligibility of Deferred 
   Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Recipients and Certain Other 
 Noncitizens for a Qualified Health Plan through an Exchange, Advance 
  Payments of the Premium Tax Credit, Cost-Sharing Reductions, and a 
                        Basic Health Program''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2024

 Mr. Pfluger (for himself, Mrs. Fischbach, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Ellzey, 
 Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Ogles, and Mr. Balderson) submitted the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services relating to ``Clarifying the Eligibility of Deferred 
   Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Recipients and Certain Other 
 Noncitizens for a Qualified Health Plan through an Exchange, Advance 
  Payments of the Premium Tax Credit, Cost-Sharing Reductions, and a 
                        Basic Health Program''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating 
to ``Clarifying the Eligibility of Deferred Action for Childhood 
Arrivals (DACA) Recipients and Certain Other Noncitizens for a 
Qualified Health Plan through an Exchange, Advance Payments of the 
Premium Tax Credit, Cost-Sharing Reductions, and a Basic Health 
Program'' (89 Fed. Reg. 39392 (May 8, 2024)), and such rule shall have 
no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Moffett B. Roller

mroller@rollerbauer.com

Law Offices

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Washington Dulles International Airport

45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200

Dulles, VA 20166

Phone: 202-331-3300 • Fax: 202-331-3322

Lee A. Bauer

lbauer@rollerbauer.com

October 3, 2014

Mr. Robert Finamore

Foreign Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Polling Report: Application of Jetstar Japan Co., Ltd. for Exemption and Statement of

Authorization; Docket DOT-OST-2014-0176

Dear Mr. Finamore:

In confirmation of our initial email notification of October 2, 2014, we have polled the

U.S. carriers on the Service List that was attached to the Application of Jetstar Japan Co., Ltd. for

Exemption and Statement of Authorization. None of the U.S. carriers on the Service List has any

objection to DOT approval of the Amended Application, and we therefore respectfully request

the Department to expedite approval of the Application.

The Application seeks the authority necessary for Jetstar Japan to codeshare with

American Airlines by displaying the AA* code on flights operated by Jetstar Japan. The inital

codesharing will be on ten city-pairs within Japan,but the Application seeks as broad an

authorization as possible under the U.S.-Japan bilateral.

American Airlines' current codesharing arrangement with Japan Airlines to the Japanese

points in question is ending in the next few weeks, and Jetstar Japan requests expedited approval

of it Application so that Jetstar Japan and American Airlines can implement the new codesharing

arrangement with a minimum of disruption and inconvenience to passengers.

We are serving copies of this letter by email on all parties that were served with the

original Application.

Respectfully submitted,

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Attorneys for Jetstar Japan Co., Ltd.

By: ___________________________

Moffett B. Roller

cc: Service List
Opinion issued January 4, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00950-CV

———————————

IN RE JORDAN ADAMS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a motion to dismiss this original proceeding as moot.

1 We 

grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Landau and Rivas-Molloy.

1 The underlying case is Tierra Collette v. Donoven Wingard, David Svoboda, 

Jessie Walker, and Jordan Adams, cause number 2022-08784, pending in the 

270th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Dedra Davis

presiding.
#### 208.7403 Acquisition procedures.

Follow the procedures at PGI 208.7403 when acquiring commercial software and commercial software services.

[71 FR 39005, July 11, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 6581, Jan. 31, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                             154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      348
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                        571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1133
<PP&E>                                            3893
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              594
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1095
<OTHER-SE>                                       (6637)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1547
<SALES>                                           2579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2579
<CGS>                                             2347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2568)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2568)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2568)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)
        

</TABLE>