alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 2, 2021)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 7789-7791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02251]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 20 / Tuesday, February 2, 2021 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 7789]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2021-03 of January 14, 
                2021

                
Presidential Determination on the Pursuant to 
                Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense 
                Authorization Act for FY 2012

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary 
                of the Treasury[, and] the Secretary of Energy

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, after 
                carefully considering the reports submitted to the 
                Congress by the Energy Information Administration 
                including the report submitted in October 2020, and 
                other relevant factors, including global economic 
                conditions, increased oil production by certain 
                countries, the level of spare capacity, and the 
                availability of strategic reserves, I determine, 
                pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the 
                National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
                2012, Public Law 112-81, and consistent with prior 
                determinations, that there is a sufficient supply of 
                petroleum and petroleum products from countries other 
                than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the 
                volume of petroleum and petroleum products purchased 
                from Iran by or through foreign financial institutions.

                I will continue to monitor this situation closely.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 14, 2021

Billing code 4710-10-P


[[Page 7790]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD02FE21.000


[[Page 7791]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD02FE21.001


[FR Doc. 2021-02251
2-1-21; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-C
#### 3416.402 Application of predetermined, formula-type incentives.
3403.104-7 Violations or possible violations. ( d ) ( 2 ) ( ii ) ( B ) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 3.104-7(d)(2)(ii)(B).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 418 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 418

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2018 as ``National 
                        Rosie the Riveter Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2018

   Mr. Casey (for himself, Mrs. Capito, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Coons, Mr. 
Isakson, and Mr. Manchin) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2018 as ``National 
                        Rosie the Riveter Day''.

Whereas National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise 
        awareness of the 16,000,000 women who worked during World War II;
Whereas the people of the United States have chosen to honor women workers who 
        contributed from the home front during World War II;
Whereas those women left their homes to work or volunteer full-time in 
        factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, banks, and other 
        institutions in support of the Armed Forces overseas;
Whereas those women worked with the United Service Organizations and the 
        American Red Cross, drove trucks, riveted airplane parts, collected 
        critical materials, rolled bandages, and served on rationing boards;
Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the history and 
        legacy of working women, including volunteer women, during World War II 
        to promote cooperation and fellowship among those women and their 
        descendants;
Whereas those women and their descendants wish to further the advancement of 
        patriotic ideas, excellence in the workplace, and loyalty to the United 
        States; and
Whereas March 21, 2018, during Women's History Month, is an appropriate day to 
        designate as ``National Rosie the Riveter Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of March 21, 2018 as 
        ``National Rosie the Riveter Day''; and
            (2) acknowledges the important role played by women during 
        World War II.
                                 <all>
```
**First in the World (FITW) Program**

**Directory of FY 2015 Validation and Development Grantees Listed by State**

## FITW Validation Grants

**FITW Development Grants**

[10/8/2015]
EXHIBIT 21     



                         LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



     The Partnership is a partner of Sherry Lane Associates, a general
partnership which holds title to the Sherry Lane Place Office Building in
Dallas, Texas.  The Partnership is a partner of Copley Place Associates, a
limited partnership which holds title to Copley Place in Boston,
Massachusetts.  The developer of the property is a partner in the joint
venture.  The developer of the property is a partner in the joint venture. 
The Partnership is a 20% shareholder in Carlyle Managers, Inc. and 20%
shareholder in Carlyle Investors, Inc.  Reference is made to the Notes for
a description of the terms of such joint venture partnerships.  The
Partnership's interest in the joint ventures and the results of its
operations are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Partnership filed with this annual report.
#### Security Options Corp. v. Richard Shelton.

Motion to vacate the dismissal (22 A D 2d 855) denied, without costs. The affidavits submitted by the appellant, including the affidavit previously submitted in opposition to the motion to dismiss the appeal, fail to present a satisfactory factual showing of a reasonable excuse for the delay in perfecting this appeal taken in September, 1962. Furthermore, the plaintiff appellant has failed to make a prima facie showing of merit. (See *Tonkonogy*v. *Jaffin,*21 A D 2d 264.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Staley, JJ.
#### William Berger, Respondent, v. 2026 Pacific Street, Inc., Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay, pending appeal, granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the June Term, beginning May 21, 1962; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before May 14, 1962. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### Ann Sabathie, as Administratrix of the Estate of George Alexander, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Ralph Russo et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff Mary Alexander and for personal injury and the death of the intestate of the plaintiff Sabathie, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 10, 1964, after a jury trial, in favor of the three defendants, upon the dismissal of the complaint against them, without prejudice, at the close of plaintiffs’ case. Judgment, insofar as it is in favor of the defendants G. G. Cab Corp. and James Perpignano, affirmed, without costs; judgment, insofar as it is in favor of the defendant Ralph Russo, reversed on the law; the action is severed as to said defendant; and a new trial is granted as between him and the plaintiffs, with costs to abide the event. No questions of fact have been considered. In our opinion, the evidence: (a) that the motor truck which was being driven by defendant Russo was to the left of and not as far forward as the taxicab -that was being driven by defendant Perpignano, as both vehicles were proceeding westerly in the same direction into an intersection; (b) that Russo put the truck into the process of making a right turn in order to go north on the *912intersecting avenue; and (e) that the truck then struck the rear part of the left-hand side of the taxicab, constituted as matter of law a prime facie showing of negligence on Russo’s part. We do not regard the exclusion of the minutes of the hearing before the Motor Vehicle Bureau as reversible error. If such minutes contained admissions against interest by the drivers of the two vehicles, they would have been admissible in evidence *(Reed*v. *McCord,*160 N. Y. 330, 341). However, they were not offered in evidence as admissions; they were offered under the statute (CPLR 4517) as the testimony *of*a witness given at a prior trial, which would be admissible under certain circumstances only. Further, no proper foundation as to the authenticity and accuracy of the minutes was established; the minutes were not marked for identification and were not presented to this court. Hence, this court cannot determine whether in fact the minutes contained any admissions against interest or whether they were material to the issues. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Conklin, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated May 9, 1963, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered April 24, 1956 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of- sodomy in the first degree and sentencing him to serve a term of 7% to 15 years. Order •affirmed. Such affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the prosecution of another *coram nobis*proceeding either: (a) upon proof by the affidavit of *829Martha Duff, the attorney who represented defendant at the time he pleaded guilty, or by the affidavits of other persons having knowledge, that he (the defendant) was induced to plead guilty by reason of a promise by the District Attorney that he would be sentenced to serve a term of one to two years; or (b) upon proof by defendant’s own affidavit showing that, after the date of the entry of the order hereon, he made a bona fide request of Miss Duff and of the other persons with knowledge (naming or identifying them) for affidavits with respect to the said promise by the District Attorney, and that all of them ignored his request or refused to furnish any affidavit either affirming or denying such promise. Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Ughetta, Acting P. J., and Hill, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to remit the proceeding to the County Court, Westchester County, for a hearing, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, the present record sufficiently raises an issue of fact which should be resolved by a hearing at which all the available witnesses will testify and will be subject to cross-examination (cf. *People*v. *Vellucci,*13 IT Y 2d 665). Defendant alleged that he had been induced to plead guilty by a promise that a light sentence would be imposed. When sentence of a. substantial term was imposed, defendant’s former attorney, Martha Duff, immediately moved to set it aside as unduly severe. The Assistant District Attorney in his affidavit states that such former attorney declined to give him an affidavit that she (the attorney) knew of no promise or stipulation as to sentence. We think these elements distinguish this case from *People*v. *Scott*(10 N Y 2d 380) and require that a hearing be held now, without compelling the defendant to submit further preliminary proof as a eondtion precedent to a hearing *(People*v. *Picciotti,*4 N Y 2d 340, 344; *People*v. *Lain,*309 N. Y. 291, 293; *People*v. *Richetti,*302 N. Y. 290, 296). It should also be noted that in his brief the defendant now alleges that he did endeavor to communicate with his former attorney but that she ignored his letters. In a *coram nobis*proceeding, one who is incarcerated and who presents an issue of fact should not be required in advance to marshall and to submit *all*his proof by way of corroborative evidence in order to be entitled to a hearing; it is sufficient if he presents a prima facie ease.
# C_2019366EN.01006001.xml

| 30.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/60

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 October 2019

(2019/C 366/12)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1095 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4706 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86328 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7923 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1041 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2748 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,543 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 328,78 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2693 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7559 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3596 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6186 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4486 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6994 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7481 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5121 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 295,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2241 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8392 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4568 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 590,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6410 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,623 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,9154 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,524 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4300 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,1812 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,6150 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1095

JPY

Japanese yen

120,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4706

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86328

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7923

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1041

ISK

Iceland króna

138,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2748

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,543

HUF

Hungarian forint

328,78

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2693

RON

Romanian leu

4,7559

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3596

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6186

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4486

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6994

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7481

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5121

KRW

South Korean won

1 295,86

ZAR

South African rand

16,2241

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8392

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4568

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 590,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6410

PHP

Philippine peso

56,623

RUB

Russian rouble

70,9154

THB

Thai baht

33,524

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4300

MXN

Mexican peso

21,1812

INR

Indian rupee

78,6150

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

AMCORE Financial, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statement (Nos. 333-10446, 333-775261, and 333-118911) on Form S-8 of AMCORE Financial, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of AMCORE Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc.Our report on the consolidated financial statements of AMCORE Financial, Inc. refers to the adoption effective January 1, 2006 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois

March 15, 2007
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 16

- 4145

_____________

FREDERICK M. WEINBERG; JANICE T. NINI,

Appellants

v.

SCOTT E. KAPLAN, LLC

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(District Court No.: 3

- 16

- cv

- 04913 )

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It has come to the Clerk’s attention that the caption was incorrect on the Court’s

Opinion and Judgment entered August 21, 2017, and did not include the second

Appel lant Janice T. Nini

. It is noted that the opinion addressed the claims on behalf of

both husband and wife. Accordingly, I t is hereby O R D E R E D that the caption on the

opinion filed on August 21, 2017 is amended as follows:

FREDERICK M. WEINBERG; JANICE T. NINI,

Appellants

v.

SCOTT E. KAPLAN, LLC

In addition , an A mended Judgment and Amended Mandate will be issued.For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: September 14, 2017

CJG/cc: Peter A. Ouda, Esq.

William G. Wright, Esq.
#### Beatrix M. Petschauer v. Freidrich Petschauer.

Motion to dismiss appeal and vacate stay granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before May 1, 1962, with notice of argument for the June 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
# C_2017169EN.01000101.xml

| 30.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8346 — Macquarie/USSL/OSW assets of UK GIB)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 169/01)

On 22 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8346. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8346. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 124 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller 

of the Currency relating to ‘‘Principles for Climate-Related Financial 

Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2024 

Mr. DONALDS (for himself, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. PERRY, Mr. OGLES, Mr. WEBER

of Texas, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. MEUSER, and Mr. HUIZENGA) submitted the 

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating 

to ‘‘Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Of4 fice of the Comptroller of the Currency relating to ‘‘Prin5 ciples for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for 

6 Large Financial Institutions’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 74183; pubVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:33 Apr 05, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ124.IH HJ124

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 124 IH 

1 lished October 30, 2023), and such rule shall have no force 

2 or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          25,036
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,258
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,208
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    292,542
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         292,542
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           292,542
<LOANS>                                        502,262
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 851,674
<DEPOSITS>                                     595,905
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,910
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,983
<LONG-TERM>                                    161,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,876
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 851,674
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 41,306
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,120
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   574
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                57,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,518
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,887
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           30,113
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,464
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 575
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,584
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,050
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.89
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,430
<LOANS-PAST>                                       441
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,270
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,258
<RECOVERIES>                                       478
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,954
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,954
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**FY 2019 SAFRA SLATE - NCC AWARDS**