28550 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

reasonable further progress, or any other 

applicable requirement of the Act. 

As described in section III above, EPA 

believes that the proposed revisions to 

Wisconsin’s SIP meet Federal 

requirements and will not interfere with 

attainment or reasonable further 

progress. Sources exempt from 

obtaining a construction permit will 

continue to be subject to all applicable 

requirements and compliance 

demonstration methods per Wisconsin’s 

air pollution regulations. Sources that 

receive a permit exemption will still be 

required to undergo a control 

technology review during operation 

permit initial issuance, renewal, or 

revision as appropriate. All sources will 

be required to conduct monitoring and 

maintain records sufficient to 

demonstrate compliance with 

Wisconsin’s regulatory requirements. 

Additionally, any source required to 

submit an air emission inventory report 

of annual actual emissions above 

thresholds in NR 438, will still be 

required to submit this report. 

Furthermore, since an exemption from 

the requirement to obtain a construction 

permit does not exempt the facility from 

meeting the air quality standards and 

increments, all exempt sources will be 

included in any analysis of increment 

consumption at nearby facilities as 

required in NR 406.07. 

V. What action is EPA taking on this 

submittal? 

EPA is proposing to approve revisions 

to Wisconsin rules NR 406 and 410, 

submitted by the State on April 23, 

2008. The SIP revisions submitted, 

described in section II, above, are 

consistent with Federal regulations 

governing state permitting programs. 

See section III, above. EPA is also 

soliciting comment on this proposed 

approval. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Act, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Act. Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Act; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: April 25, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11476 Filed 5–14–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0021;EPA–R05– 

OAR–2013–0022; FRL–9812–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; 

Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana, 

1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan 

and 1997 Annual Fine Particulate 

Matter Maintenance Plan Revisions to 

Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions 

Budgets 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

Indiana’s request to revise the Lake and 

Porter State Implementation Plans (SIPs) 

for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, and 

the 1997 annual fine particulate matter 

(PM2.5) standard to replace the 

previously approved motor vehicle 

emissions budgets (budgets) with 

budgets developed using EPA’s Motor 

Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) 

2010a emissions model. The Indiana 

Department of Environmental 

Management (IDEM) submitted these 

requests to EPA with submittal letters 

dated February 1, 2013. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 14, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2013–0021 for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone maintenance plan revision or 

EPA–RO5–OAR–2013–0022 for the 1997 

annual PM2.5 maintenance plan 

revision, by one of the following 

methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules 28551 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anthony Maietta, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)353–8777, 

maietta.anthony@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because EPA 

views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

relevant public comments received will 

be addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the Rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: April 30, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11454 Filed 5–14–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0968 FRL–9812–1] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; 

Canton-Massillon 1997 8-Hour Ozone 

Maintenance Plan Revision to 

Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions 

Budgets 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

the request by Ohio to revise the 

Canton-Massillon, Ohio, 1997 8-hour 

ozone maintenance air quality State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) under the 

Clean Air Act to replace the previously 

approved motor vehicle emissions 

budgets with budgets developed using 

EPA’s Motor Vehicle Emissions 

Simulator (MOVES) emissions model. 

Ohio submitted the SIP revision request 

to EPA on November 26, 2012. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 14, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2012–0968, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anthony Maietta, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8777, 

maietta.anthony@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the state’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because EPA 

views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the Rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: April 30, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11448 Filed 5–14–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services 

42 CFR Part 447 

[CMS–2367–P] 

RIN 0938–AR31 

Medicaid Program; State 

Disproportionate Share Hospital 

Allotment Reductions 

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & 

Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The statute, as amended by 

the Affordable Care Act, requires 

aggregate reductions to state Medicaid 

Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) 

allotments annually from fiscal year 

(FY) 2014 through FY 2020. This 

proposed rule delineates a methodology 

to implement the annual reductions for 

FY 2014 and FY 2015. The rule also 

proposes to add additional DSH 

reporting requirements for use in 

implementing the DSH health reform 

methodology. 

DATES: To be assured consideration, 

comments must be received at one of 

the addresses provided below, no later 

than 5 p.m. on July 12, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer 

to file code CMS–2367–P. Because of 

staff and resource limitations, we cannot 

accept comments by facsimile (FAX) 

transmission. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS