alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
249.501-70 Special termination costs. ( a ) The clause at 252.249-7000, Special Termination Costs, may be used in an incrementally funded contract when its use is approved by the agency head.
( b ) The clause is authorized when— ( 1 ) The contract term is 2 years or more;
( 2 ) The contract is estimated to require— ( i ) Total RDT&E financing in excess of $25 million; or
( ii ) Total production investment in excess of $100 million; and
( 3 ) Adequate funds are available to cover the contingent reserve liability for special termination costs.
( c ) The contractor and the contracting officer must agree upon an amount that represents their best estimate of the total special termination costs to which the contractor would be entitled in the event of termination of the contract. Insert this amount in paragraph (c) of the clause.
( d ) ( 1 ) Consider substituting an alternate paragraph (c) for paragraph (c) of the basic clause when— ( i ) The contract covers an unusually long performance period; or
( ii ) The contractor's cost risk associated with contingent special termination costs is expected to fluctuate extensively over the period of the contract.
( 2 ) The alternate paragraph (c) should provide for periodic negotiation and adjustment of the amount reserved for special termination costs. Occasions for periodic adjustment may include— ( i ) The Government's incremental assignment of funds to the contract;
( ii ) The time when certain performance milestones are accomplished by the contractor; or
( iii ) Other specific time periods agreed upon by the contracting officer and the contractor.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Scott A. Montgomery, certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of National Mercantile Bancorp;

 

2. Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the smallbusiness issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.  Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | September 28, 2006      |   | /s/ Scott  A. Montgomery |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Scott A. Montgomery     |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>














































<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRST
QUARTER REPORT ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,765
<SECURITIES>                                       150
<RECEIVABLES>                                      335
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                      1,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,270
<PP&E>                                             863
<DEPRECIATION>                                     671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,128
<OTHER-SE>                                         281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,969
<SALES>                                            951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   935
<CGS>                                              669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (   32)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (   33)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (   33)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (   33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (  .01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018016EN.01000301.xml

| 18.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 16/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Latvia

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania will jointly issue a commemorative euro coin with a common design in 2018, celebrating the establishment of the States of Estonia and Latvia and the re-establishment of the State of Lithuania

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The three baltic States are symbolically represented as a braid. They are united by their history: a common past, present and future. A stylized numeral representing the 100th anniversary, and the heraldic signs of all three States, are featured as well. At the left side is the name of the issuing country ‘LATVIJA’ and at the right side is the year of issuance ‘2018’. The design was selected by public voting in all three Baltic countries.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
  :

Estimated number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : First quarter of 2018

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 45 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Education relating to ‘‘Waivers and 

Modifications of Federal Student Loans’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 
2 

•HJ 45 EH 

1 Department of Education relating to ‘‘Waivers and Modi2 fications of Federal Student Loans’’ (including the website 

3 announcement entitled ‘‘One-Time Federal Student Loan 

4 Debt Relief’’ and the Federal Register document entitled 

5 ‘‘Federal Student Aid Programs (Federal Perkins Loan 

6 Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, and 

7 William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program)’’ 87 Fed. 

8 Reg. 61512 (Oct. 12, 2022)), and printed in the Congres9 sional Record on March 22, 2023, on pages S903–S906, 

10 along with a letter of opinion from the Government Ac11 countability Office dated March 17, 2023, that the Waiv12 ers and Modifications are a rule under the Congressional 

13 Review Act, and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 45 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapStudent Loans’’. ing to ‘‘Waivers and Modifications of Federal submitted by the Department of Education relat- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-74095) of International Lease Finance Corporation and in the
related Prospectus of our report dated February 19, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 1996 and the related schedule of International Lease
Finance Corporation and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Century City,
Los Angeles, California
March 17, 1999
# C_2019001EN.01000301.xml

| 3.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 December 2018

(2019/C 1/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1454 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4673 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90273 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2773 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1227 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 133,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9738 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,778 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 321,61 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3028 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6630 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,0400 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6215 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5602 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9716 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7060 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5642 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 279,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4506 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8778 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4095 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 639,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7556 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,282 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 79,5445 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,317 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4427 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,5554 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,2255 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1454

JPY

Japanese yen

126,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4673

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90273

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2773

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1227

ISK

Iceland króna

133,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9738

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,778

HUF

Hungarian forint

321,61

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3028

RON

Romanian leu

4,6630

TRY

Turkish lira

6,0400

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6215

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5602

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9716

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7060

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5642

KRW

South Korean won

1 279,35

ZAR

South African rand

16,4506

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8778

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4095

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 639,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7556

PHP

Philippine peso

60,282

RUB

Russian rouble

79,5445

THB

Thai baht

37,317

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4427

MXN

Mexican peso

22,5554

INR

Indian rupee

80,2255

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 10(a)


 


[Sutherland
Asbill and Brennan LLP Letterhead]


 


STEPHEN E. ROTH


DIRECT LINE: 202.383.0158


Internet:
steve.roth@sutherland.com


 


October 28, 2009


 


Board of Directors


Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company


2801 Highway 201 South


Birmingham, Alabama 35223


 


Directors:


 


We hereby consent to the reference to our
name under the caption “Legal Matters” in the statement of additional
information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 4 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-146508) filed by Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company
and Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.  In giving this
consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent
is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Stephen E. Roth

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Stephen E. Roth
Exhibit 32.2

I, Christopher M. Capone, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central
      Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the "Companies") for the period ending
      June 30, 2004 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Companies.

Date: August 6, 2004


                                              /s/ Christopher M. Capone
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                                Christopher M. Capone
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                              of CH Energy Group, Inc.


                                              /s/ Christopher M. Capone
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                                Christopher M. Capone
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                    of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CH Energy Group, Inc. and to Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation and will be retained by CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson Gas
& Electric Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]


                                       55
87 So.2d 608

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lucius FORSYTH.

No. 42706.

March 26, 1956.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1956.

Chandler C. Luzenberg, Jr., Girard J. Fernandez, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

*1089Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon D. Hubert, Jr., Dist. Atty., Adrian G. Duplantier, First Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for appellee.

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

This is a companion case to State v. Forsyth, 229 La. 690, 86 So.2d 536; State v. Reinhardt, 229 La. 673, 86 So.2d 530; State v. Mills, 229 La. 758, 86 So.2d 895; State v. Callia, 229 La. 796, 86 So.2d 909; and State v. Crovetto, 229 La. 793, 86 So.2d 907 —all lottery cases. In the instant proceedings, Lucius Forsyth has submitted to this court without oral argument his appeal from a conviction of gambling in contravention of Article 90 of the Louisiana Criminal Code, R.S. 14:90, relying on six bills of exception in his effort to get a new trial. These bills present for our review nothing which we have not already passed on in the cases already handed down.

Bill No. 1 was reserved to the introduction in evidence during Forsyth’s trial of lottery paraphernalia seized by police officers when they arrested a man named Roland Boudreaux, and also of a payroll tax deduction memorandum for Boudreaux which was made out about two and a half months before the latter was arrested. The argument made here is that at the time the lottery paraphernalia were introduced there was no proof before the court that Boudreaux was Forsyth’s agent. Moreover, in objecting to the payroll tax deduction memorandum appellant contends that this document was too remote in time from the date of the crime charged to be admissible. For an answer to these objections see State v. Forsyth, supra, and State v. Mills, supra.

Bills Nos. 2, 3, and 4 were reserved when the trial judge permitted the State to file in evidence photostatic copies of Forsyth’s federal wagering tax returns, and also his quarterly reports made to the Louisiana Department of Labor, Division of Employment Security. During the trial defense counsel objected to the introduction of the wagering tax returns on the ground that they were only photostatic copies and therefore not the best evidence. It was also argued that the federal and state reports were not identified by their respective custodians, and that the reports that had been filed during 1953 were too remote in time from the date of the crime to be admissible. These objections were answered by us in State v. Forsyth, supra, and in State v. Mills, supra. In brief in this court counsel for appellant for the first time argue that these state and federal documents are privileged and confidential, and that their admission in evidence violates Forsyth’s constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. For a rebuttal of these contentions see our opinion in State v. Mills, supra.

Bills Nos. 5 and 6 in this case are conceded in brief by counsel for Forsyth to contain no legal points not covered by Bills *1091Nos. 1-4 above, and for this reason deserve no further comment on our part.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
**CYoshitomi - Department of Education Regulatory Negotiations**

**Conference Agenda**

**Topic 2:   DOE Regulatory Negotiations: Accreditation - Separate and Independent Part B**

Similarly, the Department seeks recommendations on how to prevent costly and unnecessary credential inflation, which is sometimes driven by accreditors in partnership with affiliated credentialing organizations.

FacilitatePro Conference Report
You are here: EPA Home Technology Transfer Network Models & Tools Economic Analysis

Models/Tools Elasticity Databank

Elasticity Databank

In the absence of an encyclopedic ‘Book of Elasticities’ the

Elasticity Databank serves as a searchable database of elasticity

parameters across a variety of types (i.e., demand and supply

elasticities, substitution elasticities, income elasticities, and trade

elasticities) and economic sectors/product markets. A submittal

form allows you to provide elasticity estimates for consideration as

part of this databank

For details on TTNWeb's file type icons, standard file formats,

and how to use them, see the TTNWeb File Types page.

File Description File

Date

File

Types

Elasticity Databank 9-03

Elasticity Databank User Manual 9-03

Elasticity Submittal Form 7-05

Technology Transfer Network

Economics & Cost Analysis Support

http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/Elasticity.htm

Last updated on Friday, June 22, 2007

3/15/2011 EPA - TTN - ECAS - Air Compliance Ad...

www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/Elasticity.htm 1/1
#### 42.1301 General.

Situations may occur during contract performance that cause the Government to order a suspension of work, or a work stoppage. This subpart provides clauses to meet these situations and a clause for settling contractor claims for unordered Government caused delays that are not otherwise covered in the contract.
324.7001 Policy on Compliance with HIPAA business associate contract requirements. ( a ) HHS is a HIPAA “covered entity” that is a “hybrid entity” as these terms are defined at sections 160.103 and 164.103 respectively. As such, only the portions of HHS that the Secretary has designated as “health care components” (HCC) as defined at section 164.103, are subject to HIPAA. HHS' HCCs may utilize persons or entities known as “business associates,” as defined at section 160.103. Generally, “business associate” means a “person” as defined by section 160.103 (including contractors, and third-party vendors, etc.) if or when the person or entity: ( 1 ) Creates, receives, maintains, or transmits “protected health information”, as the term is defined at section 160.103, on behalf of an HHS HCC to carry out HHS HIPAA “covered functions” as that term is defined at 164.103; or
( 2 ) Provides certain services to an HHS HCC that involve PHI.
( b ) Where the Department as a covered entity is required by 45 CFR 164.502(e)(1) and 164.504(e) and, if applicable, sections 164.308(b)(3) and 164.314(a), to enter into a HIPAA business associate contract, the relevant HCC contracting officer, acting on behalf of the Department, shall ensure that such contract meets the requirements at section 164.504(e)(2) and, if applicable, section 164.314(a)(2).