alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44022

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

BRAD LEE WACASTER ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 794

Filed: November 29, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. Robert C. Naftz , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and suspended unified sentence of sixteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of six years, for aggravated assault, affirmed

.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appella te Public Defender; Reed P. Andersen , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello , Deputy Attorne y General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________
PER CURIAM Pursuant to a binding I.C.R. 11 plea agreement, Brad Lee Wacaster pled guilty to aggravated assault . I.C. § § 18

- 901(b) and 18

- 905(a)

. In exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge was dismissed. According to the plea agreement, the district court would grant probation. However, the district court was left with the discretion as to the length of the sentence and length of probati on. The district court sentenced Wacaster to a unified term of sixteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of six years

. T he district court suspended the sentence and placed Wacaster on probation for fifteen years

. Wacaster appeals

.2

On a ppeal, Wacaster argues that the length of his probation is excessive

. The State, however, asserts that Wacaster’s appeal is barred by the doctrine of invited error. Assuming without deciding that Wacaster’s appeal is not barred, we address the merits. S entencing is a

matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 11 4, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App. 1984); State

v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length
of a sentence, we consider t he defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Wacaster’s judgm ent of conviction and sentence are affirmed

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 3031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1047]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Release of Airport Property: Tampa International Airport, Tampa, 
FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and Request for Public Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain 
airport properties, approximately 3.407 acres, at the Tampa 
International Airport, Tampa, FL from the conditions, reservations, and 
restrictions as contained in federal grant assurances. The release of 
property will allow the Hillsborough County Aviation Authority to 
dispose of the property for other than aeronautical purposes. The 
property is located southwest corner airport property, adjacent to 
Highway 60. The parcel is currently designated as non-aeronautical use. 
The property will be released of its federal obligations to grant a 
perpetual utlility easement to the Tampa Electric Company (TECO) for 
relocation of transmission lines serving the Skyway Substation located 
off airport. The fair market value of the parcel has been determined by 
appraisal to be $695,000.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Tampa International Airport and 
the FAA Airports District Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments are due on or before February 21, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at the Tampa 
International Airport, and the FAA Airports District Office, 5950 
Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written 
comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered or mailed to: 
Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, 
5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

Bart Vernace,
Acting Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-1047 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016104
<NAME> CAGLE'S, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                             212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20465
<ALLOWANCES>                                       446
<INVENTORY>                                      38383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 65792
<PP&E>                                           95286
<DEPRECIATION>                                   34024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  145262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29843
<BONDS>                                          58196
<COMMON>                                          5006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       44516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    145262
<SALES>                                         175835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                175835
<CGS>                                           171926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   180499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3597)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2480
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1348)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2199)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.439)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.439)
        

</TABLE>
2408.404 Pricing. ( d ) Supplies offered on the schedule are listed at fixed prices. Services offered on the schedule are priced either at hourly rates, or at fixed price for performance of a specific task (*e.g.,* installation, maintenance, and repair). GSA has determined the prices of supplies and fixed-price services, and rates for services offered at hourly rates, to be fair and reasonable for the purpose of establishing the schedule contract. GSA's determination does not relieve the ordering activity Contracting Officer from the responsibility of making a determination of fair and reasonable pricing for individual orders, BPAs, and orders under BPAs. Contracting Officers shall follow the general principles and techniques outlined in FAR Section 15.404-1, Proposal Analysis Techniques, to ensure that the final agreed-to price is fair and reasonable, keeping in mind that the complexity and circumstances of each acquisition should determine the level of detail of the analysis required.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

Note: The Randolph Sheppard program has no specific appropriations line item in the federal budget.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 253.208-2 DD Form 448-2, Acceptance of MIPR.

Follow the procedures at PGI 253.208-2 for use of DD Form 448-2.

[71 FR 39005, July 11, 2006]
EXHIBIT 32.1 **Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer**I, Joel P. Moskowitz certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that: (1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: April 25, 2008 By:  /s/ JOEL P. MOSKOWITZ    **Joel P. Moskowitz**    **Chief Executive Officer**
PUBLIC LAW 111–182—JUNE 9, 2010 124 STAT. 1267 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4017: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 155 (2009): Dec. 8, 10, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 156 (2010): May 25, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–182 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 43 Maple 

Avenue in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ANN MARIE BLUTE POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 43 Maple Avenue in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post 

Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Ann Marie Blute Post Office’’. 

Approved June 9, 2010. 

June 9, 2010 

[H.R. 4017] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

The Department reports annually on performance measures and indicators for this program in the Justification for Appropriations submitted to Congress as part of the President's Budget Request for the U.S. Department of Education.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
37.106 Funding and term of service contracts. ( a ) When contracts for services are funded by annual appropriations, the term of contracts so funded shall not extend beyond the end of the fiscal year of the appropriation except when authorized by law (see paragraph (b) of this section for certain service contracts, 32.703-2 for contracts conditioned upon availability of funds, and 32.703-3 for contracts crossing fiscal years).
( b ) The head of an executive agency, except NASA, may enter into a contract, exercise an option, or place an order under a contract for severable services for a period that begins in one fiscal year and ends in the next fiscal year if the period of the contract awarded, option exercised, or order placed does not exceed one year (10 U.S.C. 3133 and 41 U.S.C. 3902). Funds made available for a fiscal year may be obligated for the total amount of an action entered into under this authority.
( c ) Agencies with statutory multiyear authority shall consider the use of this authority to encourage and promote economical business operations when acquiring services.
[60 FR 37778, July 21, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 44815, Aug. 22, 1997; 63 FR 58601, Oct. 30, 1998; 79 FR 24212, Apr. 29, 2014; 87 FR 73900, Dec. 1, 2022]
#### 3404.470-1 Contract clause.

The contracting officer must include the clause at 3452.204-71 (Contractor security vetting requirements) in solicitations and contracts when it is anticipated that contractor employees will have access to proprietary or sensitive Department information including *Controlled Unclassified Information* as defined in 32 CFR 2002.4(h), Department Information Technology (IT) systems, contractor systems operated with Department data or interfacing with Department systems, Department facilities/space, and/or perform duties in a school or in a location where children are present.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6432

JIMMY FAIRCLOTH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEAN WALKER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-480-5-BR)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Faircloth, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant

Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

 To the extent Faircloth seeks to raise issues not properly

presented to the district court, we find they are waived. See Muth

v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding claims

raised for first time on appeal will not be considered absent

exceptional circumstances).

2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Faircloth, a North Carolina prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation

of a magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken to this court from the

final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention

complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude Faircloth has not made the

requisite showing.* See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 123

S. Ct. 1029, 1039-40 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[111th Congress Public Law 173]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 122 STAT. 1215]]

Public Law 111-173
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To clarify the health care provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
      that constitutes minimum essential coverage. <<NOTE: May 27, 
                         2010 -  [H.R. 5014]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDED BY THE SECRETARY 
                              OF VETERANS AFFAIRS THAT CONSTITUTES 
                              MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.

    (a) In General.--Clause (v) of section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 1501(b) of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, <<NOTE: Ante, p. 248.>> is 
amended to read as follows:
                          ``(v) a health care program under chapter 17 
                      or 18 of title 38, United States Code, as 
                      determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 
                      in coordination with the Secretary of Health and 
                      Human Services and the Secretary,''.

    (b) Effective Date.--The <<NOTE: 26 USC 5000A note.>> amendment made 
by subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in section 1501(b) of 
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Approved May 27, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5014 (S. 3162):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            May 12, considered and passed House.
            May 18, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2023

No awards.

## FY 2022

Appropriation: $1,264,988New Fellowships: 21Average Fellowship Award: $60,238

## FY 2011 - 2016

No awards.

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov