alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of National Mercantile Bancorp(the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, David R. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)  The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                        | /s/  DAVID R.  BROWN |   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                        | David R. Brown            |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer   |
|                        |
|                        |
| Date:  March  29, 2004 |

 

1

----
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for TennesseeReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for TennesseeReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for TennesseeReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479582078.unknown

# _1479582079.unknown

# _1479582077.unknown
#### In the Matter of New York State Electric *&*Gas Corporation, Appellant, v. Edward Ance et al., Defendants, and Rocco Mancini, Respondent.

Motion by appellant for a stay, pending appeal, granted. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Homer Hooper, Jr., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for a hearing in accordance with the Memorandum. Memorandum: On September 16,1963, Honorable Henry P. Smith III, Niagara County Judge, signed an order, which has never been vacated, granting defendant a hearing upon his application for a writ of error *coram nobis.*A hearing was held on October 1,1963 and decision reserved. No decision was rendered before January. 1, 1964 when Judge Smith was succeeded by Honorable John Hogan who on March 24, 1964 dismissed the writ upon the ground that defendant could not resort to *coram nobis*to review matters which occurred before finding of the indictment. Section 21 of the Judiciary Law prohibits a County Judge from deciding a question which was argued orally in the court when he was not present and sitting thereon as a Judge. In these circumstances the matter should be *1007remitted for a hearing. We in no way pass upon the merits of the application. (Appeal from order of Niagara County Court, denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment for assault, second degree, rendered February 21, 1956.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Yecehio, JJ.
# ATTACH A 2022 vm

# Slate

FY 2022 MSEIP SLATE (Funding down the slate & Make whole)	Page &P of &N

# Attachment A send vm2 (2)

# Attachment A work vm2

# Attachment A work vm

# slate cal (2)

# Attachment A

# slate cal

# ATTACH A 2022

# ATTACH B 2022

# SLATE DOC
#### Salvatore Graziano, Appellant, v. Hires Turner Glass Company, Respondent.

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: This record presented a factual issue to be passed upon by a jury. All concur, except Henry, J., who dissents and votes to affirm. (Appeal from a judgment of Monroe Trial Term dismissing the complaint on the merits in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.19


Dr. Ralph W.F. Hardy
330 The Parkway
Ithaca, NY  14850

Dear Dr. Hardy:

By this letter agreement, BioTechnica would like to amend your Consulting 
Agreement dated January 8, 1996, as follows:

2.  Term; Payment Upon Termination

(a)  The term of this Agreement shall commence on January 1, 1997, and shall 
terminate on the earlier of the death of the Consultant or on December 31, 
1997 (the "Expiration Date").

If the provisions of this letter are in accordance with your understanding, 
please sign and return one of the enclosed copies.

Very truly yours,



/s/ Bruno Carette
President and Chief Operating Officer

Acknowledged and Agreed by:

/s/ Ralph W.F. Hardy                      Dec. 4, 1996
Ralph W.F. Hardy                          Date
### RECEIVED OPPI CBIC p.1 CBIC Control Number 

### 363081
December 18, 2014 Sanitized Copy 

### 201 1 i DEC 19 PM 12: 32

Federal Express: Document Control Office — Room 6428 (Phone 202-564-8930) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. EPA Confidential Business Information Center (CBIC) 1201 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Proposed Significant New Use Rule Certain Nonylphenols and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates 79 FR 50186 (Oct. 1, 2014) Docket #EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0490

] is providing comments to the proposed Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) for 15 certain nonylphenol (NP) and nonylphenol ethoxylate (NPE) substances.

Very Truly Yours,
#### 3437.102 Policy.

If a service contract requires one or more end items of supply, FAR subpart 37.1 and this subpart apply only to the required services.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6888

WESLEY THOMAS GALLOP, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Lawrence Richard Leonard, Magistrate Judge. (2:16-cv-00596-MSD-LRL)

Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 21, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wesley Thomas Gallop, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wesley Thomas Gallop, Jr., seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying 

his motion for appointment of counsel and the magistrate judge’s report recommending 

that Gallop’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition be denied. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order denying Gallop’s motion for 

appointment of counsel and the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation are neither 

final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny 

Gallop’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2018004EN.01000601.xml

| 6.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 January 2018

(2018/C 4/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2045 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4459 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88883 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8318 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1757 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7418 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,594 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,77 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1554 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6351 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5127 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5361 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5068 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4188 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6837 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5993 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 281,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8886 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8151 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4350 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 164,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8180 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,065 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,7724 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,773 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9057 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,3267 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,3290 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2045

JPY

Japanese yen

136,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4459

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88883

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8318

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1757

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7418

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,594

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,77

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1554

RON

Romanian leu

4,6351

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5127

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5361

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5068

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4188

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6837

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5993

KRW

South Korean won

1 281,20

ZAR

South African rand

14,8886

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8151

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4350

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 164,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8180

PHP

Philippine peso

60,065

RUB

Russian rouble

68,7724

THB

Thai baht

38,773

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9057

MXN

Mexican peso

23,3267

INR

Indian rupee

76,3290

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### DEEGAN, Appellant, v. SYRACUSE LIGHTING CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department,

Janu*1132ary 10, 1906.)

Action by Julia A. Deegan against the Syracuse Lighting' Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with •costs.

HISCOOK, J.,

not sitting.
32.611 Contract clause. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232—17, Interest, in solicitations and contracts unless it is contemplated that the contract will be in one or more of the following categories: ( 1 ) Contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.
( 2 ) Contracts with Government agencies.
( 3 ) Contracts with a State or local government or instrumentality.
( 4 ) Contracts with a foreign government or instrumentality.
( 5 ) Contracts without any provision for profit or fee with a nonprofit organization.
( 6 ) Contracts described in Subpart 5.5, Paid Advertisements.
( 7 ) Any other exceptions authorized under agency procedures.
( b ) The contracting officer may insert the FAR clause at 52.232-17, Interest, in solicitations and contracts when it is contemplated that the contract will be in any of the categories specified in 32.611(a).
The RISE Award is a national honor given each year to classified school employees 

who are doing extraordinary and inspirational things in their schools and 

communities to promote quality education, foster safe and positive learning 

environments, and ensure student success.

The Recognizing Achievement in Classified School Employees Act - Public Law 116-

13 – which was passed by Congress in 2019. The act was passed with 

overwhelming bipartisan support in the House of Representatives and Senate and 

creates the first national U.S. Department of Education award of its kind and 

directs the U.S. Secretary of Education to establish a national award program,

Recognizing Inspiring Schools Award (RISE) – to honor exemplary classified school 

employees – (please reference definition in legislation) for their outstanding 

contributions to quality education in the United States and serve as our unsung 

heroes. 

To educate the public on the important, and often invisible, educational 

support rendered by some of the hardest-working people in our schools –

they serve in the capacity of the glue to the school. In short, to remind the 

school community that it takes a village to ensure student success.

The award recognize excellence exhibited by full- or part-time classified school 

employees who provide exemplary service to students in pre-kindergarten 

through high school. 

Each year the U.S. Department of Education solicit for all U.S. states to submit 

their top two exemplary classified employee nomination (s) for the opportunity to 

be selected and recognized as the national honoree by the Secretary of 

Education. 

(1) Classified school employees provide valuable service in the 

 United States.

(2) Classified school employees provide essential services, such as 

transportation, facilities.

 maintenance and operations, food service, safety, and health care. 
(3) Classified school employees play a vital role in providing for the 

welfare and safety of students. 

(4) Classified school employees strive for excellence in all areas of service 

to the education community. 

(5) Exemplary classified school employees should be recognized for their 

outstanding contributions to quality education in the United States.

In continuation, nationally, the RISE award collaborates with states to nominate 

some incredible unsung heroes who serve as the glue to our U.S. schools. 

The department has created a State Implementation toolkit designed to support 

all states interested. The State Implementation toolkit not only provides 

information and step by step guidelines on nominating deserving employees but 

helps to promote Recognizing Inspiring Schools Employee (RISE) Award, a

program that recognizes and honors classified employees across the nation.

Help spread the word. Share this information about Recognizing Inspiring Schools 

Award (RISE) with your state school districts so deserving classified employees are 

nominated for this award. If you have any questions, please reach out to Frances 

W. Hopkins, RISE Award Director at RISE@ed.gov.
# C_2017169EN.01000901.xml

| 30.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 May 2017

(2017/C 169/10)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1196 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4415 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87190 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7275 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0888 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4018 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,434 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,40 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1830 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5568 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9963 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5038 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5077 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7249 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5856 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5479 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4108 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6782 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4240 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 891,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7790 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,729 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,7967 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,122 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6609 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6839 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,2175 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1196

JPY

Japanese yen

124,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4415

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87190

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7275

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0888

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4018

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,434

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,40

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1830

RON

Romanian leu

4,5568

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9963

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5038

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5077

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7249

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5856

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5479

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,82

ZAR

South African rand

14,4108

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6782

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4240

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 891,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7790

PHP

Philippine peso

55,729

RUB

Russian rouble

63,7967

THB

Thai baht

38,122

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6609

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6839

INR

Indian rupee

72,2175

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 3001.301-72 HSAC or HSAR Notice numbering.

HSACs and HSAR Notices will be numbered consecutively on a fiscal year basis beginning with number “01” prefixed by the last two digits of the fiscal year (e.g., HSAR Notices 03-01 and 03-02 indicate the first two HSAR Notices issued in fiscal year 2003).
324.103 Procedures for the Privacy Act. ( a ) The contracting officer shall review all acquisition request documentation to determine whether the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) are applicable. The Privacy Act requirements apply when a contract or order requires the contractor to design, develop, or operate any Privacy Act system of records on individuals to accomplish an agency function. When applicable, the contracting officer shall include the two Privacy Act clauses required by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 24.104 in the solicitation and contract or order. In addition, the contracting officer shall include the two FAR Privacy Act clauses, and other pertinent information specified in this subpart, in any modification which results in the Privacy Act requirements becoming applicable to a contract or order.
( b ) The contracting officer shall ensure that the statement of work or performance work statement (SOW or PWS) specifies the system(s) of records or proposed system(s) of records to which the Privacy Act and the implementing regulations are applicable or may be applicable. The contracting officer shall send the contractor a copy of 45 CFR part 5b, which includes the rules of conduct and other Privacy Act requirements.
( c ) The contracting officer shall ensure that the contract SOW or PWS specifies for both the Privacy Act and the Federal Records Act the disposition to be made of the system(s) of records upon completion of contract performance. The contract SOW or PWS may require the contractor to destroy the records, remove personal identifiers, or turn the records over to the contracting officer. If there is a legitimate need for a contractor to keep copies of the records after completion of a contract, the contractor must take measures, as approved by the contracting officer, to keep the records confidential and protect the individuals' privacy.
( d ) For any acquisition subject to Privacy Act requirements, the requiring activity prior to award shall prepare and have published in the Federal Register a “system notice,” describing the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) intent to establish a new system of records on individuals, to make modifications to an existing system, or to disclose information in regard to an existing system. The requiring activity shall attach a copy of the system notice to the acquisition plan or other acquisition request documentation. If a system notice is not attached, the contracting officer shall inquire about its status and shall obtain a copy from the requiring activity for inclusion in the contract file. If a notice for the system of records has not been published in the Federal Register, the contracting officer may proceed with the acquisition but shall not award the contract until the system notice is published and the contracting officer verifies its publication.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

135070 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver & (8) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 135070 AGC: 2205/07 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion fo r appointment of co unsel is DENIED.

l1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2023

                - List of Grantees and Project Abstracts:    MS Word  (361K) 
                - Google Map of FY 2023 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2022

                - Google Map of FY 2022 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2021

                - List of Grantees and Project Abstracts:    PDF   (258K)   FY 2020                    - List       of Grantees and Project Abstracts:    PDF  (539K)  FY 2019  No new awards were made in FY 2019.  FY 2018  No new awards were made in FY 2018.  FY 2017  Grantees and abstracts:                    - Project Descriptions    MS Word  (33K) |  PDF  (80K)
                  - Google Map of IFLE FY 2017 Grantees  FY 2011- 2016  No new awards were made in FY 2011 through 2016.      IFLE Home             Printable view  Last Modified: 11/15/2023           How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity

 
  *Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
- vote.gov