alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
36.213-2 Presolicitation notices. ( a ) Unless the requirement is waived by the head of the contracting activity or a designee, the contracting officer shall issue presolicitation notices on any construction requirement when the proposed contract is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Presolicitation notices may also be used when the proposed contract is not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. These notices shall be issued sufficiently in advance of the invitation for bids to stimulate the interest of the greatest number of prospective bidders.
( b ) Presolicitation notices must— ( 1 ) Describe the proposed work in sufficient detail to disclose the nature and volume of work (in terms of physical characteristics and estimated price range)(see 36.204);
( 2 ) State the location of the work;
( 3 ) Include tentative dates for issuing invitations, opening bids, and completing contract performance;
( 4 ) State where plans will be available for inspection without charge;
( 5 ) Specify a date by which requests for the invitation for bids should be submitted;
( 6 ) State whether award is restricted to small businesses; and
( 7 ) Specify any amount to be charged for solicitation documents.
( 8 ) Be publicized through the Governmentwide point of entry in accordance with 5.204.
[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1744, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985; 51 FR 19716, May 30, 1986. Redesignated at 62 FR 272, Jan. 2, 1997, as amended at 66 FR 27414, May 16, 2001; 69 FR 59699, Oct. 5, 2004; 71 FR 57368, Sept. 28, 2006]
# C_2019177EN.01000101.xml

| 23.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 May 2019

(2019/C 177/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1171 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4680 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7600 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1252 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7598 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,793 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 326,54 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3038 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7625 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,8110 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6221 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4952 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7692 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7173 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5399 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 329,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0504 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7108 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4260 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 225,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6756 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,610 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,7625 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,686 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5163 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2345 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,8600 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1171

JPY

Japanese yen

123,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4680

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88280

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7600

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1252

ISK

Iceland króna

138,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7598

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,793

HUF

Hungarian forint

326,54

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3038

RON

Romanian leu

4,7625

TRY

Turkish lira

6,8110

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6221

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4952

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7692

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7173

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5399

KRW

South Korean won

1 329,30

ZAR

South African rand

16,0504

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7108

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4260

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 225,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6756

PHP

Philippine peso

58,610

RUB

Russian rouble

71,7625

THB

Thai baht

35,686

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5163

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2345

INR

Indian rupee

77,8600

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  (1)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: October 28, 2008
    By:
    /s/ JERROLD J. PELLIZZONJerrold J. PellizzonChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23**
**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors**
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8, No. 333-58599) pertaining to theBurr-Brown Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive Plan and 1998Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement(Form S-8, No. 33-12185) pertaining to the Burr-BrownCorporation Future Investment Trust of our report datedJanuary 17, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.
     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule ofBurr-Brown Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This scheduleis the responsibility of the Company’s management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. Inour opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,when considered in relation to the basic financial statementstaken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects theinformation set forth therein.
Tucson, ArizonaFebruary 4, 2000
#### William Webber, Jr., an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem Marcelina Webber, et al., Respondents, v. Joseph P. Denning, Appellant.

In a negligence action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 4, 1963, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, under all the circumstances presented by this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether or not the defendant acted with reasonable care. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
403.405 Misrepresentations or violations of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees. ( a ) A suspected misrepresentation or violation of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees shall be documented in writing by the contracting officer and reported immediately to the chief of the contracting office. The chief of the contracting office shall determine if a violation has occurred and report any violation to the Office of Inspector General. The chief of the contracting office shall take action in accordance with FAR 3.405(b).
( b ) If the chief of the contracting office decides to refer the case to the Department of Justice, it should be referred through the Office of Inspector General with a copy of the report and referral submitted through the HCA to the Senior Procurement Executive.
[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 70 FR 44, Jan. 3, 2005]
Promoting Postbaccalaureate Opportunities for Hispanic Americans Program 

FY 2009 New Awards 

Institution Name State FY 2009 

Award 

P031M090020 New Mexico Institute of Mining and 

Technology 

NM $573,697 

P031M090027 Sul Ross State University TX $574,898 

P031M090011 Heritage University WA $463,225 

P031M090012 University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras 

Campus 

PR $569,026 

P031M090004 Woodbury University CA $574,773 

P031M090052 Carlos Albizu University-San Juan Campus PR $572,481 

P031M090024 Mount St. Mary’s College CA $562,000 

P031M090054 Florida International University FL $531,711 

P031M090043 University of St. Thomas TX $574,559 

P031M090028 Carlos Albizu University-Miami Campus FL $575,000 

P031M090022 Universidad Metropolitana PR $564,747 

P031M090023 University of LaVerne CA $575,000 

P031M090005 California State University, Bakersfield CA $574,997 

P031M090051 Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi TX $569,808 

P031M090019 Mercy College NY $527,333 

P031M090007 Northeastern Illinois University IL $334,956 

P031M090038 Texas A&M University-Kingsville TX $572,582 

P031M090041 Cal State L.A. University Auxiliary 

Services, Inc. 

CA $549,481 

P031M090045 University of Texas at Brownsville and 

Texas Southmost College 

TX $480,820 

P031M090050 University of Texas-Pan American TX $333,740 

P031M090018 Inter American University of Puerto Rico 

Barranquitas Campus 

PR $201,111 

P031M090049 Nova Southeastern University FL $541,362 

 Total Individual Funding $11,397,307 

03/22/2010
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Rand Construction Company, Inc., Appellant, and County of Rockland, Respondent.

In a special proceeding to confirm an arbitrators’ award pursuant to statute (CPLR 7510), the petitioner (a general contractor) appeals from so much of the final order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, made March 19, 1964, and thereafter entered in Rockland County, confirming the award and directing entry in Rockland County of judgment in petitioner’s favor, as directed that “the payment of said judgment and execution * * * thereon be stayed until the submission to the County Treasurer ” of Rockland County of “ proof of payment of all liens and monies, if any, now due and outstanding [to subcontractors and materialmen] together with an affidavit sworn to by a proper official [of petitioner] showing that all liens and monies, if any, now outstanding have been paid and discharged ”. Order modified as follows: (1) by striking out its second decretal paragraph requiring the petitioner to submit to the County Treasurer proof of the payment of all moneys due and the discharge of all liens outstanding; (2) by striking out from the third decretal paragraph the provision staying the payment of the judgment and execution thereon until such proof shall have been submittéd; and (3) by substituting therefor a decretal paragraph that the payment of the judgment and execution thereon shall be stayed until petitioner shall have complied with the conditions for payment specified in the contract between the parties, made December 22, 1958. As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Under *827the contract between the parties the county is not required to pay the award or the judgment thereon, no more than it is required to pay any sums due under the contract, until petitioner shall have complied with the conditions precedent to payment, as prescribed by the contract itself. This modification is therefore necessary in order to avoid any doubt or dispute as to whether the conditions stated in the order appealed from are the same or more burdensome than or in excess of the contractual conditions. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
# C_2021104EN.01000301.xml

| 26.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 March 2021

(2021/C 104/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1802 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86068 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1935 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1045 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 149,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1653 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,233 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 364,78 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6399 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8865 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,4313 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5548 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4849 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1700 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6948 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5899 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 340,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6852 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7220 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5748 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 024,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8937 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,335 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,0115 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,746 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,6960 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,6616 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,7605 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1802

JPY

Japanese yen

128,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86068

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1935

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1045

ISK

Iceland króna

149,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1653

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,233

HUF

Hungarian forint

364,78

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6399

RON

Romanian leu

4,8865

TRY

Turkish lira

9,4313

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5548

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4849

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1700

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6948

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5899

KRW

South Korean won

1 340,88

ZAR

South African rand

17,6852

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7220

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5748

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 024,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8937

PHP

Philippine peso

57,335

RUB

Russian rouble

90,0115

THB

Thai baht

36,746

BRL

Brazilian real

6,6960

MXN

Mexican peso

24,6616

INR

Indian rupee

85,7605

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2021278EN.01000101.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 278/01)

Last publication

OJ C 263, 5.7.2021

Past publications

OJ C 252, 28.6.2021

OJ C 242, 21.6.2021

OJ C 228, 14.6.2021

OJ C 217, 7.6.2021

OJ C 206, 31.5.2021

OJ C 189, 17.5.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
***Please  note:  these presentations provide general information and do not  represent a complete recitation of the applicable law and OCR policy in these  areas. They do not address specific issues of compliance because determinations  of compliance depend on specific facts on a case-by-case basis. The language  used in these slides is approved for the purposes of these presentations only  and should not be used for other purposes.***
#### New York Consolidated Freightways Corp., Respondent, v. Long Fuels, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 1.) New York Consolidated Freightways Corp., Respondent, v. Nicholas Mariani, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Nicholas Mariani, Appellant, v. Long Fuels, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 3.)

Appeal by appellant Long Fuels, Inc., in Action No. 1 dismissed as not timely taken, without costs, and without prejudice to an application, pursuant to CPLR 1402, to be substituted as respondent in Action No. 2. Appeal by appellant Nicholas Mariani in Action No. 2 dismissed, without costs, unless appellant shall, on or before September 30, 1964, file and serve record, brief and notice of argument for the term *972commencing November 9, 1964, in which event motion denied. Cross appeal by respondent-appellant Long Fuels, Inc., in Action No. 3 dismissed, without costs, on the ground cross appellant is not a party aggrieved. Cross motion to dismiss appeals by appellant Nicholas Mariani denied, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

# Panel Review by Applicant

## Kentucky

Bottom of Form

# _1479585419.unknown
#### 2932.408 Application for advance payments.

After consulting with the SPE, the HCA may authorize advance payments without interest pursuant to FAR 32.408.
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02353]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 
Act (``CAA'')

    On January 29, 2021, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed 
consent decree with the United States District Court for the District 
of Utah in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Stericycle, Inc., 
Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00012-JNP.
    The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air Act 
alleging violations of NOx emission limits at Stericycle, Inc.'s 
medical waste incinerator in North Salt Lake, Utah (an ozone 
nonattainment area) and other related violations. The proposed consent 
decree will require Stericycle to pay a $600,000 civil penalty and 
conduct a supplemental environmental project to replace 15-20 pre-2006 
diesel school buses with low emitting models at an estimated cost of 
$2,000,000.
    The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on 
the proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
and should refer to United States v. Stericycle, Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 
90-5-2-1-12057. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty 
(30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be 
submitted either by email or by mail:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         To submit comments:                     Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................  [email protected].
By mail.............................  Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
                                       DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
                                       Washington, D.C. 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the public comment period, the proposed consent decree may 
be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of 
the proposed consent decree upon written request and payment of 
reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent 
Decree Library, U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-
7611.
    Please enclose a check or money order for $8.50 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.

Jeffrey Sands,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-02353 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
```
Jaguar Cars Limited EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT No. J08146D0A Causal part name: SENDER MODULE Causal part number: XR852864

Issued: 19 May 2010 Page 1 of 2 Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40. Part 85. Subpart T. §85.1903 - Emissions Defect Information Report

(c)(1) The manufacturers corporate name. Jaguar Cars Limited.

(c)(2) A description of the defect. Drivers of Jaguar S-type vehicles experience poor or no-start, rough & uneven running and M.I.L. illumination. Dealer technicians identify a defective fuel pump as the root cause of the problem.
(c)(3) A description of each class or category of vehicles potentially affected by the defect including make, model, model year, and such other information as may be required to identify these vehicles. See table in section (c)(4)(i) below. (c)(4) For each class or category of vehicle or engine desc ribed in response to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the following shall also be provided: (c)(4)(i) The number of vehicles or engines known or estimated to have the defectand an explanation of the means by which this number was determined.

MODEL YEAR TEST GROUP MODEL SALES DEFECTS 2007 7JCXV04.2DSK S-TYPE R 173 1 2007 7JCXV04.2DNK S-TYPE 4.2 446 1 2007 7JCXV03.0DNK S-TYPE 3.0 1962 2 2006 6JCXV04.2DSK S-TYPE R 402 8 2006 6JCXV04.2DNK S-TYPE 4.2 1321 23 2006 6JCXV03.0DNK S-TYPE 3.0 5125 91 2005 5JCXV03.0DNE S-TYPE 3.0 8881 1 The above data was taken from Jaguar's warranty tracking report dated 2009 Q4.

(c)(4)(ii) The address of the plant at which the potentially defective vehicles or engines were produced. Jaguar Castle Bromwich Plant, Birmingham, England. 

### EPA 4033 Rec. 5/19/2010Jaguar Cars Limited EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT No. J08146D0A Causal part name: SENDER MODULE Causal part number: XR852864

Issued: 19 May 2010 Page 2 of 2 (c)(5) An evaluation of the emissions impact of the defect and a description of any driveability problems which a defective vehicle might exhibit. There is no adverse impact on emis sions associated with this issue. Driveability is adversely affected by poor or no-start, rough & uneven running. This defect illuminates the M.I.L.

(c)(6) Available emissions data which relate to the defect. There is no impact on emission s associated with this defect.

(c)(7) An indication of any an ticipated manufacturer follow-up. This issue is regarded as self campaigning, MIL illumination plus uneven engine running will prompt drivers to return the vehicle to a Jaguar dealer for rectification. 

### EPA 4033 Rec 5/19/2010
# C_2019216EN.01000301.xml

| 27.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 June 2019

(2019/C 216/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1362 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4651 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89603 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5435 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1113 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6733 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,486 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2627 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7220 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5500 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6277 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4947 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8724 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7004 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5387 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 312,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2802 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8139 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3956 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 097,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7124 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,456 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,6399 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,955 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3624 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7972 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,5705 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1362

JPY

Japanese yen

122,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4651

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89603

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5435

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1113

ISK

Iceland króna

141,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6733

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,486

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2627

RON

Romanian leu

4,7220

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5500

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6277

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4947

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8724

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7004

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5387

KRW

South Korean won

1 312,86

ZAR

South African rand

16,2802

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8139

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3956

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 097,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7124

PHP

Philippine peso

58,456

RUB

Russian rouble

71,6399

THB

Thai baht

34,955

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3624

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7972

INR

Indian rupee

78,5705

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### HORENBURGER et al., Appellants, v. ROTH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

Action by Herman Horenburger and others against Isaac . Roth. Judgment for defendant dnd plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

A. J. Westermayr, for appellants. Hoffman & Wahle, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

There was nothing but a question of fact to be submitted to the jury in this case. This was done by the trial judge in a charge to which no exception was taken. We see no reason for disturbing the verdict of the jury. Judgment affirmed, with costs.