REPL Yt o TSAI AANSWE R

Apri l 29 , 201 0 Offic e o fth e Chie fCounse l Attention : FA

APart 1 6 Airpor t Proceeding s Docket , AGC-61 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , SW . Washington , DC 2059 1 Docke t No . 16-09-1 4 

# C E 1 ¥ MAK AIRPORT/ENVIRONMENTA L LAW , AGC-60 Q REPL Yt o ANSWE R T O ''AMENDMENT " RDM , LL C V . Te d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t 

## REPL Y RDM , LL C (RDM) , hereb yReplie s t o th e Answe rfile d b yTe d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t(TSAIA ) i n regar d t o RDM' s Amendmen t date d Apri l 14 , 2010 . I n doin g so , RD M wil l referenc e th e pag e an d line s fro m th e TSAI AAnswe rtha ti s i n question . 

### Pag e 3 , Lin e 4- 8 TSAI Adi d no t trea t AGLA D (an d henc e RDM ) fairly . TSAI Aha d vastl ydifferin g polic y wit h regard s t o it s tenants . Thes e difference s ar e concisel ydetaile d i n bot h th e origina l RD M Complain t an d th e correspondin g filings . 

### Pag e 3 , Lin e 9-1 7 Thi s paragrap h clearl yillustrate s TSAIA' s inabilit yt o neithe rgras p th e natur e no rth e gravit yo fthei rpolic yfailures . TSAI Acommitte d polic yfailure s befor e AGLA D eve n signe d thei rlease , durin g th e signin g o fAGLAD' s lease , durin g AGLAD' s tenancy , an d finall ywhe n TSAI Atoo k AGLAD' s leas e back . Example s o fthes e policyfailure s occurrin g a t ver ydifferin g tim e period s i s clearl yillustrate d i n previou s filings . TSAIA' s continue d referenc e tha tAGLA D onl yallege s polic yfailur e a t th e en d o fthei r leas e i s bot h wron g an d confusing . 

### Pag e 3 , Lin e 18-2 6 & Pag e 4 , Lin e 1- 3 TSAI Aagai n make s th e feebl e argumen t tha tAGLAD' s developmen twa s to o ambitiou s an d tha t th e projec t faile d becaus e "it s economic s prove d t o b e unsoun d an d it s develope rincapabl e o fsustainin g it. " Thi s i s simpl yno ttrue . TSAI A continue s t o ignor e thei rfaile d policy . Specifically , ha d TSAI Ano t violate d Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assuranc e by : 1 . Insertin g a "financial " obligatio n int o AGLAD' s leas e whic h ha d no t bee n include d i n othe rTSAI Atenan t leases . 2 . No t ignorin g o rsubstantiall yextendin g AGLA D leas e obligation s t o th e degre e tha t CargoPort receive d extensions .

RD M V . TSAI A- Pag e 1 o f4REPL Yt o TSAI AANSWE R

3 . Failin g t o significantl yexten d AGLAD' s leas e i n ligh t o fth e terribl e world/nationa l recession . CargoPortreceive d thi s concessio n i n 199 8 fo r lik e cause . 4 . Failin g t o gran t a longe rinitia l ter m i n whic h t o complet e Phas e I improvements . CargoPort receive d thi s concession . 5 . Failin g t o allo wAGLA D t o defaul t o n onl yon e o fit s parcel s instea d o fal l th e parcel s whe n AGLA D wa s foun d i n defaul tfo rno tprovidin g proo fo f financin g fo rPhas e I . CargoPort' s an d FedEx' s parcel s wer e treate d individuall yno tcollectively . 6 . No t givin g AGLA D ren t deferra l unti l improvement s wer e substantiall y complete . CargoPort an d FedE xreceive d thi s concession . 7 . No t grantin g AGLA D th e abilit yt o pa ybaci cdeferre d ren tove rtw o years . FedE xreceive d thi s concession . 8 . Failin g t o provid e AGLA D wit h fre e "fill " materia l fo rit s sit e development . FedE xan d UPS receive d thi s concession . 9 . Failin g t o provid e AGLA D th e abilit yt o sel l it s improvement s t o TSAI A an d leas e bac k

th e improvement s as a mechanis m t o receiv e favorabl e financing . CargoPort receive d thi s concession . 10 . Denyin g AGLA D th e abilit yt o us e Firs t Rigli to fRefusal s fo rthei r development . UPS an d FedE xreceive d thi s concession . 11 . Denyin g AGLA D "Preferentia l Use " o fhardstand s P-1 , P-2 , an d P-3 . UP S receive d thi s concession . 12 . No t givin g AGLA D th e righ tt o ren t th e P-1 , P-2 , an d P-3 hardstand s a ta lo w rate . FedE xreceive d thi s concession . 13 . Makin g AGLA D pa yfo rtaxiwa yconstruction , maintenance , an d operation . CargoPort , UPS , an d FedE xreceive d thi s concession . 14 . Makin g AGLA D pa yfo rsit e civi l wor k fo rthei rdevelopment . FedE x receive d thi s concession . 15 . Makin g AGLA D pa yfo rhanga rconstruction . FedE xreceive d thi s concession . 16 . Economicall yundercuttin g AGLAD' s developmen tb ydecreasin g TSAIA' s fe e fo rparkin g carrier s a tthei rhardstand s fro m $17 9 pe rfou rhou rsto p t o $88.52 , a 51 % decrease . 17.Transferrin g AGLAD' s wetland s permi tt o TSAI Awithou tcompensation . AGLAD' s projec t woul d hav e easil ymove d forwar d an d bee n successful . 

### Pag e 4 , Lin e 4-1 8 TSAI Amake s th e statemen t tha t th e questio n a t han d "i s no twhethe rANC' s leasin g policywa s ultimatel yperfect , no rwhethe rdifferen t decisions , i n hindsight , migh t hav e bette rpromote d aviatio n i n Alaska.... " Thi s i s false . RDM^ s complain tha s everythin g t o d o wit h ANC' s leasin g policy . Thi s i s becaus e o fth e following : Revie wo fMajo rPoints : 1 . Th e plannin g an d developmen t o fTe d Steven s Anchorag e Internationa l Airpor t ha s bee n financed , i n part , wit h fund s provide d b yth e FA Aunde rth e

RD M V . TSAI A- Pag e 2 o f4REPL Yt o TSAIAANSWE R Airpor tImprovemen t Progra m (AIP) , authorize d b yth e Airpor tan d Airwa y Improvemen tAc t o f1982 , a s amended , 4 9 U.S.C . §47101 , etsec7 . 2 . As such , TSAI Amus tcompl ywit h Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assurances . 3 . AGLA D Postmark , LL C (AGLAD ) signe d a leas e wit h TSAI Ao n Novembe r18 , 2005 . 4 . RDM , LL

C i s a membe ro fAGLA D Postmark , LLC . (Se e Exhibi t ARD M Complain t Date d Octobe r27 , 2009. ) 5 . TSAI Aviolate d Titl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assuranc e by : Se e 1 7 violation s mentione d above . 6 . TSAIA' s violation s o fTitl e 4 9 Unite d State s Cod e §4710 7 (a ) Genera l Writte n Assuranc e "directl yan d substantiall yaffected " th e AGLA D development . I n fact , i t lea d directl yt o th e failur e o fth e development . 7 . RD M ( a membe ro fAGLA D Postmark , LLC ) los tapproximatel y$1.3 M becaus e o fTSAIA' s violations , an d henc e ha s bee n "directl yan d substantiall y affected" . As evidence d above , i t wa s faile d TSAI Aleasin g policie s tha t directl ylea d t o th e failur e o fAGLAD' s development . 

### Pag e 4 , Lin e 19-2 5 & Pag e 5 Lin e 2-1 2 Contraryt o TSAIA' s assertion s foun d i n thes e paragraphs , RD M ha s consistentl y aske d th e FA

At o judg e it s complain t base d upo n TSAIA' s faile d leasin g policyas applie d t o AGLA D an d exhaustivel yexplaine d i n RDM' s filings . RD M feel s tha t it s right s wer e violate d an d i ti s precisel yfo rthi s reaso n tha t Part1 6 i s mad e availabl e b yth e FAA . 

### Conclusio n Again , becaus e o fth e seriousnes s an d magnitud e o fth e TSAI Apolic yfailures , RD M urge s th e Directo rt o fin d TSAI Ai n "non-compliance " an d furthermor e tha tth e FA A den ycontinue d FAA/Publi cfundin g t o TSAI Aunti l prope ran d appropriat e correctiv e action s ar e rendered . RDM' s pligh t reveal s no t onl ywrong s administere d t o AGLA D b yTSAI Abu ti tals o reveal s a muc h greate rTSAI Asystemati cpubli cpolic yfailur e tha t need s t o b e addresse d an d fixed . Sincerely , Shau n Debenha m Member , Debenha m Properties , LL C Managin g Membe ro fRDM , LL C 296 0 C Street , Suit e 20 2 Anchorage , A K9950 3 RD M V . TSAIA-Pag e 3 o

f4REPL Yt o TSAI AANSWE R

W : (907 ) 562-933 0 F : (907 ) 562-933 1 E : shaundebenham@alaska.ne t

RD M V . TSAIA-Pag e 4 o f4