alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Adam Corti, Respondent, v. A To Z Equipment Corporation, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff at a job site when the planks of a scaffold on which he was working gave way and fell down by reason of the alleged defective condition of the scaffold, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 11, 1964 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Defendant was the alleged supplier of the scaffold. There is no evidence in the record to show that any of the specific-defects which are claimed to have caused the planks to give way and fall down, existed at the time the scaffold was allegedly delivered by defendant to the job site. Without such evidence, defendant may not be held liable to the plaintiff on the theory of negligence *(Rosebrock*v. *General Elec. Co.,*236 N. Y. 227). Since such evidence may be available to plaintiff, a new trial is granted. The only evidence submitted by plaintiff was as to general defects; and such evidence was struck out. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### 436.602-5 Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

The HCA may include either or both procedures in FAR 36.602-5 in the procedures for evaluation boards.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 64 

Expressing the sense of Congress that all trade agreements the United States 

enters into, should provide reasonable access and collaboration of each 

nation involved in such an agreement, for the purpose of search and 

recovery activities relating to members of the United States Armed 

Forces still missing and unaccounted for from prior wars or military 

conflicts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, and Mr. 

MEUSER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that all trade agreements 

the United States enters into, should provide reasonable 

access and collaboration of each nation involved in such 

an agreement, for the purpose of search and recovery 

activities relating to members of the United States 

Armed Forces still missing and unaccounted for from 

prior wars or military conflicts. 

Whereas the Department of Defense Prisoners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) Accounting Agency must currently approach MIA recovery operations on a country by 

country basis via diplomatic, civil, and military negotiations; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HCON 64 IH 

Whereas countries utilizing mutually beneficial trade agreements with the United States should provide a transparent and efficient process to aid in the recovery of 

United States POW/MIA personnel; 

Whereas the Department of Defense lists 1,578 United 

States citizens who served during the Vietnam War and 

are still missing and unaccounted for in Vietnam, Laos, 

and Cambodia despite ongoing investigation and recovery 

efforts; 

Whereas some 72,500 United States personnel remain unaccounted for throughout Europe, China, and Japan after 

sacrificing their lives during World War II; and 

Whereas nearly 7,800 members of the United States Armed 

Forces are still missing and unaccounted for on the Korean Peninsula after bravely serving during the Korean 

War: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that all trade 

3 agreements the United States enters into, should provide 

4 reasonable access and collaboration of each nation involved 

5 in such an agreement, for the purpose of search, investiga6 tion, and recovery activities relating to United States per7 sonnel missing and unaccounted for from prior wars or 

8 military conflicts. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

                  - Name:
                  - **Jennifer Coffey**
                  - E-mail Address:
                  - jennifer.coffey@ed.gov
                  - Mailing Address:
                  - U.S. Department of Education, OSERSOffice of Special Education Programs550 12th St., SW, PCP-5161Washington, DC 20202
                  - Telephone:
                  - 202-245-6673

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
42.1305 Contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.242-14, Suspension of Work, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction or architect-engineer contract is contemplated.
( b ) ( 1 ) The contracting officer may, when contracting by negotiation, insert the clause at 52.242-15, Stop-Work Order, in solicitations and contracts for supplies, services, or research and development.
( 2 ) If a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its *Alternate I.*
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.242-17, Government Delay of Work, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price contract is contemplated for supplies other than commercial or modified-commercial products. The clause use is optional when a fixed-price contract is contemplated for services, or for supplies that are commercial or modified-commercial products.
[48 FR 42159, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 2270, Jan. 15, 1985; 50 FR 25680, June 20, 1985. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 48241, 48249, Sept. 18, 1995; 72 FR 27385, May 15, 2007; 86 FR 61030, Nov. 4, 2021]
#### Samuel Z. Karp, Inc. v S. E. & K. Corp. (And Another Action.)

Motion for resettlement granted and the order of this court entered on January 11, 1979 [67 AD2d 635] is resettled to add the following to the decretal paragraph thereof: "Appellant shall recover the sum of $4,750 deposited by Harvey L. Strelzin, defendant and interpleading plaintiff, on November 12, 1975, with the Clerk of the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, and the clerk of said court is directed to release and pay said sum to appellant.” Resettled order signed and filed. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Certron
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marshall I. Kass, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                            /s/ Marshall I. Kass
                                            --------------------
                                            Name :   Marshall I. Kass
                                            Title:   Chairman of the Board
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                            Date :   May 26, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company, and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       11
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 115 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 115

   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture 
        relating to ``Importation of Fresh Beef From Paraguay''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 20, 2024

Mr. Jackson of Texas (for himself, Ms. Caraveo, Mr. Lucas, Mr. LaMalfa, 
Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Bost, Mr. Feenstra, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, 
 Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Finstad, Mr. Rose, Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer, Mr. 
Nehls, Mrs. Bice, Mr. Norman, Mr. Babin, Mr. Lawler, Mr. Flood, and Mr. 
 Pfluger) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                    to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture 
        relating to ``Importation of Fresh Beef From Paraguay''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture relating to 
``Importation of Fresh Beef From Paraguay'' (88 Fed. Reg. 77883), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
From: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Tom Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven 

Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Laney, Michael N." <mnl@rti.org>, Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Beth Wittig/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Wendy 

Blake/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/14/2012 11:02 AM

Subject: EO 12866 review - NESHAP Portland Cement Interagency Review response

Hello CortneyPlease find attached revisions to subject package. Sending you the redline version so you can track your 

comments. Note we have added additional discussion on 1) soliciting comments on SS work practices 

(page 91), and 2) oxygen correction factors for raw material dryers (page 119).

(See attached file: EO12866_NESHAP FOR Portland Cement S 2060 AQ93 06112012_version 

_w_OMB_comments_MASTER Jun 14 2012 1100 am.docx)

Sharon V. Nizich

Minerals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS - US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541-2825
There are two application processes for this program -- one for eligibility and one for grant funding.

## Application for Eligibility

You must be designated an eligible institution before applying for funding under this program.  The **latest application to request designation as an eligible institution and to request a waiver of the non-federal cost share requirement**is available.  Please note the closing date(s) and refer to the Federal Register Notice.
Information for Grant FundingTimeline
**Current competitions:**FY 2024 ANNH, Part A 
Assisted Listing Numbers:  84.031N (Alaska Native) and 84.031W (Native Hawaiian)
Application Available:  February 27, 2024
Application Deadline:  April 29, 2024
Federal Register Notices- Part  A  (84.031N:  Alaska Native and 84.031W:  Native Hawaiian)   FY 2024 Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards  dated  February 27, 2024 |  PDF 
Current Application- Part A:  84.031N and 84.031W:    PDF  (870K)
Tips and Assistance
FY 2024 Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Program, Part A Competition Pre-Application Technical Assistance Webinar 

Date:  March 21, 2024Time:  3 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time)
**Log-in Via Computer:**
Click here to join the meeting Meeting ID: 231 195 477 490 Passcode: 9DgjwW Download Teams | Join on the web**Or call in (audio only):**Phone #: +1 202-991-0393   United States, Washington DC Phone Conference ID: 680 439 465#  
 Application Contacts
Robyn Wood, (202) 987-1577U.S. Department of EducationOPE, Higher Education ProgramsAlaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Program400 Maryland Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20202Fax:  (202) 205-0063

 Top

Institutional Service Home | Discretionary Grant Applications
  Last Modified: 03/13/2024
#### 42.709-7 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 52.242-3, Penalties for Unallowable Costs, in all solicitations and contracts over $800,000 except fixed-price contracts without cost incentives or any firm-fixed-price contract for the purchase of commercial products or commercial services. Generally, covered contracts are those which contain one of the clauses at 52.216-7, 52.216-16, or 52.216-17, or a similar clause from an executive agency's supplement to the FAR.

[60 FR 42659, Aug. 16, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 76358, Dec. 20, 2004; 71 FR 57368, Sept. 28, 2006; 72 FR 27385, May 15, 2007; 75 FR 53134, Aug. 30, 2010; 80 FR 38298, July 2, 2015; 85 FR 62489, Oct. 2, 2020. Redesignated at 86 FR 44255, Aug. 11, 2021; 86 FR 61030, Nov. 4, 2021]
Exhibit
      18.3





February
      7, 2007





Board
      of
      Directors


Ameren
      Energy Generating Company


One
      Ameren Plaza


1901
      Chouteau Avenue


St.
      Louis, MO 63103








Dear
      Directors:





We
      are
      providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to Ameren Energy
      Generating Company’s (Company) Form 10-Q/A filing pursuant to Item 601 of
      Regulation S-K for the period ended September 30, 2005.





We
      have
      been provided a copy of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended,
      for the period ended September 30, 2005. The Company elected to change its
      method of accounting for emission allowances from the inventory model to the
      intangible asset model effective July 1, 2005. This change had no effect on
      the
      consolidated statements of income and cash flows, and resulted in an immaterial
      reclassification to the consolidated balance sheet. Because this change in
      accounting did not materially affect the consolidated financial statements,
      the
      change is not specifically disclosed in the financial statement footnotes
      included in the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005. It should
      be
      understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over
      another for emission allowances has not been addressed in any authoritative
      accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied
      on
      management’s determination that this change in accounting principle is
      preferable. Based on our understanding of management’s reasons and justification
      for this change in accounting principle, and our discussions with management
      as
      to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to
      the
      change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company’s
      circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity
      with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, *Accounting
      Changes* .








Very
      truly yours,











/s/Pricewaterhouse
      Coopers LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP
|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended      September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |   |   |                            |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
| Date:        October 27, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ JOEL      P. MOSKOWITZ |
|                                    |   |   |                            | Joel      P. Moskowitz |
|                                    |   |   |                            | Chief      Executive Officer |

----
#### DODDATO et al. v. GATTI-McQUADE CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 12, 1906.)

Sale—Effect of Statement on Billhead.

The statement on the billhead of one making a sale that all claims must be made within 10 days after receipt of goods is not binding on the purchaser.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

Action by Nicholas Doddato and another against the Gatti-McQuade Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

■ Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and GIEGERICH and GREEN-BAUM, JJ.

Peck & McCann, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

It affirmatively appears on the record that defendant’s counsel believed the witness Gill to be the person who weighed the paper at the Whippany Mills, and that, when he discovered his mistake, he asked for an adjournment, to enable him to produce the weigher. The adjournment was granted at first on terms by the trial court, but, as appears from the record, after argument and an examination of the papers, the court dismissed defendant’s counterclaim, and gave judgment for the plaintiff, because of a statement on plaintiff’s billheads that “all claims must be made within ten days after receipt of goods.” These facts seem to indicate that the trial court, while favoring an adjournment, gave judgment in plaintiff’s favor upon an erroneous conception of the binding effect of the printed statement upon the defendants that rendered the-question of adjournment immaterial, and which does not seem to have been taken into consideration in the final disposition of the case.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs and disbursements to appellant to abide the event. '
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             227
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,171
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,493
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,456
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,485
<LOANS>                                         17,140
<ALLOWANCE>                                        163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,214
<DEPOSITS>                                      15,729
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                587
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  25,214
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    302
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   75
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    27
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   404
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 217
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              187
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     13
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          13
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        12
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.67
<LOANS-NON>                                         38
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   139
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  163
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               163
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>