alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for TexasReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for TexasReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for TexasReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479584157.unknown

# _1479584158.unknown

# _1479584156.unknown
HTTP://WWW.ETHANOLRFA.ORG/IND

USTRY/STATISTICS/

2008 WORLD FUEL ETHANOL 

PRODUCTION

Country Millions of 

Gallons 

USA 9000.0

Brazil 6472.2

European Union 733.6

China 501.9

Canada 237.7

Other 128.4

Thailand 89.8

Colombia 79.29

India 66.0

Australia 26.4

Total 17,335.2

Source: RFA, F.O. Licht 2008 Estimates
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**Who May Apply:** Under section 777(a)(3) of the HEA, an “eligible entity” is anIHE; a nonprofit organization; or a partnership of two or more IHEs ororganizations, with demonstrated expertise in:
                - Supporting students with disabilities in postsecondary education;      Technical knowledge necessary for the dissemination of information inaccessible formats;     Working with diverse types of institutions of higher education, includingcommunity colleges; and     
- The subjects necessary to support students across the broad spectrum ofdisabilities.
Institutional Services
   Printable view  Last Modified: 09/23/2021
How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity

 

*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
- vote.gov
42.002 Interagency agreements. ( a ) Agencies shall avoid duplicate audits, reviews, inspections, and examinations of contractors or subcontractors, by more than one agency, through the use of interagency agreements.
( b ) Subject to the fiscal regulations of the agencies and applicable interagency agreements, the requesting agency shall reimburse the servicing agency for rendered services in accordance with the Economy Act (31 U.S.C. 1535).
( c ) When an interagency agreement is established, the agencies are encouraged to consider establishing procedures for the resolution of issues that may arise under the agreement.
[63 FR 9062, Feb. 23, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 36014, June 6, 2000]
1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3838

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Edward Walter Kelley, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 5, 2007 Filed: January 11, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Edward Walter Kelley pleaded guilty to an indictment charging that he knowingly conspired with se veral named individuals to knowingly manufacture 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Kelley appeals his 120-month prison senten ce, arguing that the district court 1 clearly erred by attributing 50 grams of methamphetamine to him based on drugs seized from his co-conspirators. We disagree. By pleading guilty without reservation, Kelley admitted the facts alleged in the indictment. See United States v. White , 408 F.3d-2- 399, 402 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 674 (2005). Further, the uncontested factual allegations in the presentence re port indicate that near ly all of the drugs attributed to Kelley were seized from oneof the named co-conspirators who was manufacturing methamphetamine with Ke lley during that period, and who told officers the seized precursor drug was to be used to manufacture methamphetamine. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) & comment. (n.2) (in jointly undertaken criminal activity, offense level is based on defe ndant’s conduct and others’ reasonably foreseeable conduct in furtherance of crim inal activity defendant agreed to jointly undertake). Thus, we conclude the districtcourt did not clearly err in holding Kelley responsible for 50 grams of methamphetamine, see United States v. Zimmer , 299 F.3d 710, 720-21 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), wh ich quantity subjected him to the 120-month statutory minimum, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) (10-year minimum for 50 grams or more of methamphetamine).
Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
31.205-25 Manufacturing and production engineering costs. ( a ) The costs of manufacturing and production engineering effort as described in (1) through (4) below are all allowable: ( 1 ) Developing and deploying new or improved materials, systems, processes, methods, equipment, tools and techniques that are or are expected to be used in producing products or services;
( 2 ) Developing and deploying pilot production lines;
( 3 ) Improving current production functions, such as plant layout, production scheduling and control, methods and job analysis, equipment capabilities and capacities, inspection techniques, and tooling analysis (including tooling design and application improvements); and
( 4 ) Material and manufacturing producibility analysis for production suitability and to optimize manufacturing processes, methods, and techniques.
( b ) This cost principle does not cover: ( 1 ) Basic and applied research effort (as defined in 31.205-18(a)) related to new technology, materials, systems, processes, methods, equipment, tools and techniques. Such technical effort is governed by 31.205-18, Independent research and development costs and bid and proposal costs; and
( 2 ) Development effort for manufacturing or production materials, systems, processes, methods, equipment, tools and techniques that are intended for sale is also governed by 31.205-18.
( c ) Where manufacturing or production development costs are capitalized or required to be capitalized under the contractor's capitalization policies, allowable cost will be determined in accordance with the requirements of 31.205-11, Depreciation.
#### Jack Little, Appellant, v. Nobilous Little, Respondent.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JAECKLE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 1, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Fred Jaeckle.

No opinion. Judgment of conviction and order affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2016

No. 04-16-00123-CV

Roberto Carlos MENDIVES, Sr.,

Appellant

v.

Angela Rose MENDIVES,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI00877

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On March 24, 2016, we ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court by April 

4, 2016, that (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the 

reporter’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. Appellant 

filed written proof on April 8, 2016, and the reporter’s record has been filed. Our March 24, 

2016 order is satisfied. 

Appellant’s brief is due on May 9, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### 3027.304-1 General.

Interim and final invention reports and notification of all subcontracts for experimental, developmental, or research work (FAR) 48 CFR 27.304-1(e)(2)(ii) may be submitted on DD Form 882, Report of Inventions and Subcontracts.
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

I, Christopher M. Capone, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central
      Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the "Companies") for the period ended
      March 31, 2006 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Companies.

Date: May 10, 2006


                                       /s/ Christopher M. Capone
                              --------------------------------------------------
                                         Christopher M. Capone
                                 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                        of CH Energy Group, Inc.


                                       /s/ Christopher M. Capone
                              --------------------------------------------------
                                         Christopher M. Capone
                                 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                              of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation


                                       62
#### George M. Williamson, Respondent, v. Daniel T. Smith et al., Individually and Constituting the Board of Education of Consolidated Union Free School District Number 5, Town of Southold, Appellants, et al., Defendant.

On the court’s own motion, its decision of July 8, 1963 *{ante,*p. 755), is amended to read as follows: In an action to recover damages, in which the amended complaint alleges for a third cause of action that all the defendants conspired to deprive plaintiff of the benefits of his employment contract with the Board of Education of Consolidated Union Free School District No. 5, Town of Southold, and caused its premature termination, the defendants Daniel T. Smith et al., individually and as members of the said Board *835of Education appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 18, 1963, which denied their motion to dismiss for patent insufficiency the said third cause of action (Rules Civ. Frac., rule 106, subd. 4). Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion granted and third cause of action dismissed as against all the moving defendants (appellants) individually and as members of said Board of Education. In our opinion, the third cause of action, which is pleaded against the moving defendants and the defendant Allardt, Jr. (an architect), fails to set forth a cause of action for prima facie tort, intentional falsehood or conspiracy to induce a breach of the contract between the plaintiff and the board. Nor, in our opinion, does this cause of action allege facts sufficient to constitute a justiciable claim of any kind against the moving defendants. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., concurs in the result; Hill, J., not voting.
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 159 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 

Plants; Regulations Pertaining to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. NEWHOUSE (for himself, Ms. BOEBERT, Mr. ZINKE, and Ms. HAGEMAN) 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to 

‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations Pertaining to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘En5 dangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 159 IH 

1 Pertaining to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 

2 Plants’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 23919; published April 5, 2024), 

3 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2021120EN.01000101.xml

| 8.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 April 2021

(2021/C 120/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1884 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86065 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2360 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1044 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0535 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,919 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,68 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5756 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9185 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,7227 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5581 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4982 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2527 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6907 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5917 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 328,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2803 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7761 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5763 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 304,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9099 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,965 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 92,3359 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,286 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,6440 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,0091 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,3675 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1884

JPY

Japanese yen

130,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86065

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2360

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1044

ISK

Iceland króna

150,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0535

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,919

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,68

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5756

RON

Romanian leu

4,9185

TRY

Turkish lira

9,7227

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5581

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4982

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2527

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6907

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5917

KRW

South Korean won

1 328,05

ZAR

South African rand

17,2803

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7761

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5763

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 304,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9099

PHP

Philippine peso

57,965

RUB

Russian rouble

92,3359

THB

Thai baht

37,286

BRL

Brazilian real

6,6440

MXN

Mexican peso

24,0091

INR

Indian rupee

88,3675

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 3009.171-9 Clause.

Insert the clause (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.209-76, Prohibition on Federal Protective Service guard services contracts with business concerns owned, controlled, or operated by an individual convicted of a felony, in all solicitations and contracts for FPS guard services.

[74 FR 58856, Nov. 16, 2009]
#### 2928.106-6 Furnishing information.

The HCA or designee performs the functions outlined in FAR 28.106-6(c).
CERTIFICATIONS Exhibit 32.2 I, Christopher
M. Capone, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
The
 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson
 Gas & Electric Corporation (the Companies) for the period ended
 September 30, 2008 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the
 requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
The
 information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Companies. Date: November
4, 2008 /s/ Christopher M. CaponeChristopher M. CaponeExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officerof CH Energy Group, Inc./s/ Christopher M. CaponeChristopher M. CaponeExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officerof Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation - 103 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,225,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,000
<INVENTORY>                                    951,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,612,069
<PP&E>                                         141,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,808,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,596,593
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,471
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,836,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,808,304
<SALES>                                      2,960,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,815,330
<CGS>                                        2,090,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,746,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (13,708)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             386,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,303,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,307,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,307,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
#### 2401.000 Scope of part.

This part describes the method by which the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) implements, supplements and deviates from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) through the establishment of the HUD Acquisition Regulation (HUDAR), which prescribes the Department's procurement policies and procedures under the FAR System.
#### 3004.804-5 Procedures for closing out contract files.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
AMCORE Financial, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-10446) on Form S-8 of AMCORE Financial, Inc. of our report dated January 22,
2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of AMCORE Financial, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the
December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 18, 2002