alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carin Blankoff, Respondent, v Randy J. Vitucci et al., Defendants, and Travelers Insurance Company, Appellant.

Appeal by Travelers Insurance Company, a workers’ compensation carrier, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 15, 1978, as granted the plaintiffs motion to vacate its lien on the settlement proceeds of the action between plaintiff and defendants. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion is denied. Special Term held that a workers’ compensation carrier, which has made payments for compensation and medical expenses to a claimant injured during the course of his employment, may not assert a lien pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 29 of the Workers’ Compensation Law against the proceeds of a judgment on settlement obtained by the claimant against the third-party tort-feasor pursuant to article 18 of the Insurance Law (no-fault). While this holding was in accord with appellate case law, as it then existed (see *Matter of Granger v Urda,*54 AD2d 377; cf. *Grello v Daszykowski,*58 AD2d 412), the Court of Appeals, in *Matter of Granger v Urda*(44 NY2d 91), subsequently held that the workers’ compensation carrier could assert its lien under the circumstances described. Accordingly, the order of Special Term must be reversed insofar as appealed from and plaintiff’s motion to vacate the carrier’s lien must be denied. Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Rabin and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
334.201 Policy. The Department of Health and Human Services applies the earned value management system requirement as follows: ( a ) For cost or incentive contracts and subcontracts valued at $20 million or more, the contractor's earned value management system shall comply with the guidelines in the American National Standards Institute/Electronic Industries Alliance Standard 748, Earned Value Management Systems (ANSI/EIA-748).
( b ) For cost or incentive contracts and subcontracts valued at $50 million or more, the contractor shall have an earned value management system that has been determined by the cognizant Federal agency to be in compliance with the guidelines in ANSI/EIA-748.
( c ) For cost or incentive contracts and subcontracts valued at less than $20 million— ( 1 ) The application of earned value management is optional at the discretion of the program/project manager and is a risk-based decision that must be supported by a cost/benefit analysis; and
( 2 ) A decision to apply earned value management shall be documented in the contract file.
( d ) For firm-fixed-price contracts and subcontracts of any dollar value the application of earned value management is discouraged.
#### 317.107 Options.

When included as part of a multi-year contract, use of options shall not extend the performance of the original requirement beyond 5 years. Options may serve as a means to acquire related services (severable or non-severable) and, upon their exercise, shall receive funding from the then-current fiscal year's appropriation.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.1.1

Eastern Division

Jose Lopez

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05751

Honorable John Robert Blakey

City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, February 24, 2017:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Settlement conference

held on 2/24/2017. Parties have reached a binding agreement on the record. Case

dismissed without prejudice. Dismissal will convert to a dismissal with prejudice upon

notice that the parties have executed final settlement documents and funding. Civil case

terminated. Mailed notice(gel, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05751 Document #: 197 Filed: 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3901
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 149 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 149

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
  Plants; Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of 
   Grizzly Bear in the North Cascades Ecosystem, Washington State''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2024

   Mr. Newhouse submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
  Plants; Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of 
   Grizzly Bear in the North Cascades Ecosystem, Washington State''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating 
to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of a 
Nonessential Experimental Population of Grizzly Bear in the North 
Cascades Ecosystem, Washington State'' (89 Fed. Reg. 36982; published 
May 3, 2024), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019344EN.01000201.xml

| 11.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 October 2019

(2019/C 344/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1030 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4684 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8415 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0948 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0535 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,893 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 333,51 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3183 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7523 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,4936 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6307 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4678 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6522 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7422 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5187 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 315,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6898 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8567 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4280 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 609,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6205 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,970 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,2901 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,537 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5186 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5223 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,3555 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1030

JPY

Japanese yen

118,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4684

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90155

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8415

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0948

ISK

Iceland króna

138,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0535

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,893

HUF

Hungarian forint

333,51

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3183

RON

Romanian leu

4,7523

TRY

Turkish lira

6,4936

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6307

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4678

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6522

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7422

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5187

KRW

South Korean won

1 315,87

ZAR

South African rand

16,6898

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8567

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4280

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 609,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6205

PHP

Philippine peso

56,970

RUB

Russian rouble

71,2901

THB

Thai baht

33,537

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5186

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5223

INR

Indian rupee

78,3555

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Home |
|                                                   |

**Program Office:**Office of School Support and Technology Programs

The Local Flexibility Demonstration Program (Local-Flex) is a flexibility program that authorizes the Secretary to enter into local flexibility demonstration agreements with a total of up to 80 local educational agencies (LEAs) in States that do not have State-Flex authority. Consistent with the purposes of the program, Local-Flex LEAs may consolidate and use certain Federal funds for any educational purpose authorized under the ESEA. Unlike the LEA performance agreements under State-Flex (which are between SEAs and LEAs), the flexibility agreements under Local-Flex are directly between the Secretary and LEAs.

Local-Flex is not a funding program. Rather, it is a program that allows LEAs to consolidate certain local-level Federal funds they already receive.

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable viewShare this page |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
### NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00 474

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

HERMAN ROSALES JR.

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 24 th District Court

of DeWitt County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes

Appellant, Herman Rosales Jr. , by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

withdraw his appeal without prejudice on the basis he prematurely filed his notice of

appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). Appellant requests that this court allow him to

withdraw his appeal until the trial court has had a chance to make its ruling and findings.

Without p assing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to withdraw the appeal2

and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal without

prejudice . Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing

will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

GREGORY T. PERKES

Justice

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

24th day of October, 2019.
Exhibit 10.3





Exhibit 10.3




SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

(CEO)




This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement is executed as of the 1st day of October, 2009,
by and between TomoTherapy Incorporated, a Wisconsin corporation (the “Company”), and
Frederick A. Robertson, M.D., an individual (“Employee”), and amends that certain
Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) between the Employee and Company entered
into effective November 5, 2008 and amended as of July 1, 2009.



RECITALS





The Company and the Employee wish to revise Section 1.1 of the Employment Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements and covenants
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged by the Company and Employee,




IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:



1. Article 1.1 of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
following:



Article 1.1 Term of Employment. The Company employs Employee, and Employee accepts
employment by the Company, for the period commencing on November 5, 2008 and ending on March 31,
2010, subject to earlier termination as hereinafter set forth in Article III (the “Employment
Term”). This Agreement shall be automatically extended for successive additional one-year
periods beginning on March 31, 2010 and each subsequent anniversary thereof (each such extension on
a subsequent anniversary of March 31, 2010 an “Extension Period”) unless, at least 60 days
prior to any then current Extension Period, either party provides the other with a written notice
of intention not to renew, in which case Employee’s employment with the Company, and the Company’s
obligations hereunder shall terminate as of the end of said Extension Period, except to the extent
specifically provided herein. The terms of this Agreement during any Extension Period shall be the
same as the terms in effect immediately prior to such extension, subject to any such changes or
modifications as mutually may be agreed between the parties as evidenced in a written instrument
signed by both the Company and Employee.



2. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement, as amended, are not altered by this
Second Amendment and remain in full force and effect.


 


 









 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	EMPLOYEE:

	 	 	 	COMPANY:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Frederick A. Robertson, M.D.

	 	 	 	TomoTherapy Incorporated
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Frederick A. Robertson, M.D.

	 	 	 	/s/ Thomas E. Powell
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Thomas E. Powell
	 

	 	 	 	Chief Financial Officer






 


2
Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Development Grants

# Panel Review by Applicant

## Puerto Rico

Bottom of Form

# _1479587147.unknown
#### 425.102 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

          - 12 CFR Parts 217, 225, 238, and 252
          - RIN 7100-AF95

# AGENCY:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board).

# ACTION:

Technical correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects an error in amendatory instruction 2 affecting Part 217 of the Board's Regulation Q published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 3, 2021.                    

# DATES:

Effective April 5, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Asad Kudiya, Senior Counsel, (202) 475-6358 or Jonah Kind, Counsel, (202) 452-2045. You may also contact any of the named individuals in the final rule document 86 FR 7927 (February 3, 2021).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

### Correction

In final rule FR Doc. 2021-02182, published on February 3, 2021, on page 7938, in the third column, make the following corrections to instruction 2, amending § 217.11:

§ 217.11 

1. In instruction 2.b., the text “Revising the paragraph (c) subject heading and paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii), (c)(1)(iii) introductory text, and (c)(1)(iv) introductory text, (c)(1)(v) introductory text, and (c)(vi) introductory text; and” is corrected to read “Revising the paragraph (c) heading and paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii), (c)(1)(iii) introductory text, (c)(1)(iv) introductory text, (c)(1)(v) introductory text, and (c)(1)(vi); and” 

2. In instruction 2.c., the text “Correctly designating the second occurrence of paragraph (c)(1)(v) as paragraph (c)(1)(vii); and” is corrected to read “Correctly designating the second occurrence of paragraph (c)(1)(v) as paragraph (c)(1)(vii) and revising it; and” 

3. In instruction 2.d., the text “Revising paragraph (c)(2).” is corrected to read “Revising paragraph (c)(2) heading, (c)(2)(i) and (c)(2)(ii) introductory text”. 

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2021-02911 Filed 2-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2020

                - Project Abstracts:     MS Word  (113K)

## FY 2019

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2018

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2017

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2016

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2015

                - Project Abstracts:     PDF  (411K)

## FY 2014

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2013

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2012

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2011

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2010

                - Project Abstracts:     MS Word  (164K)  

FY 2010 was the first year of funding for this program.

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### Joseph G. Johns, administrator of the estate of Grace Martha Johns, appellee, v. The Peoples Gas Light & Coke Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,981.

Action for wrongful death. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph B. David, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1926.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed October 5, 1926.

Rehearing denied October 18, 1926.

Cooke, Sullivan & Ricks, for appellant; Oliver R. Barrett, of counsel.

Jacobson, Merrick & Latter, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.