alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
36.602-4 Selection authority. ( a ) The final selection decision shall be made by the agency head or a designated selection authority.
( b ) The selection authority shall review the recommendations of the evaluation board and shall, with the advice of appropriate technical and staff representatives, make the final selection. This final selection shall be a listing, in order of preference, of the firms considered most highly qualified to perform the work. If the firm listed as the most preferred is not the firm recommended as the most highly qualified by the evaluation board, the selection authority shall provide for the contract file a written explanation of the reason for the preference. All firms on the final selection list are considered *selected firms* with which the contracting officer may negotiate in accordance with 36.606.
( c ) The selection authority shall not add firms to the selection report. If the firms recommended in the report are not deemed to be qualified or the report is considered inadequate for any reason, the selection authority shall record the reasons and return the report through channels to the evaluation board for appropriate revision.
( d ) The board shall be promptly informed of the final selection.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

AMCORE Financial, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 33-10446) on FormS-8 of AMCORE Financial, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of AMCORE Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. Our report refers to a change inmethod of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2002 and a change in method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities in 2001.
Exhibit 99.2

                                   CERTIFICATE
                                 furnished under
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Warner L. Baxter,  chief  financial  officer of Central  Illinois Public
Service  Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  the
accompanying  Report of Central Illinois Public Service Company on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information
contained  in  such  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of Central Illinois Public Service
Company.




                                        /s/ Warner L. Baxter
                                        --------------------------------------
                                                   Warner L. Baxter
                                           Senior Vice President, Finance
                                               (Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  May 14, 2003

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Central Illinois Public Service Company and will be retained by
Central  Illinois  Public  Service  Company and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Violet Blake et al., Respondents, v Wyckoff Heights Hospital et al., Appellants.

In a medical malpractice action, defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 28, 1977, as denied that branch of defendant Wyckoff Heights Hospital’s motion (which was joined in by the other defendants) which sought to compel plaintiffs to serve authorizations to allow defendants to obtain (1) a copy of the record of the physical examination conducted of plaintiff Violet Blake by her employer in or about July, 1975, and (2) plaintiff Violet Blake’s employment records for the year 1975. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and said branch of the motion is granted. Plaintiffs’ time to furnish the authorizations is extended until 20 days after service of a copy of the order to be made hereon together with notice of entry thereof. Since plaintiff Violet Blake has put in controversy her physical condition and loss of earnings, the inspection of the items sought by defendants should have been permitted pursuant to the liberal interpretation of CPLR article 31 (see *Koump v Smith,*25 NY2d 287; *Greuling v Breakey,*56 AD2d 540; *Myers v Schneider,*59 AD2d 736). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Mangano, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 143 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 143

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
 relating to ``Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-
                     4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2024

  Mr. Allen (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. 
    Norman, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Hern, Mrs. Miller of West 
   Virginia, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Smucker, Mr. Williams of Texas, Mr. 
 Rutherford, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Banks, Ms. Letlow, Mr. Hill, Mr. Mann, 
  Mrs. Bice, Mr. Nunn of Iowa, Mr. Finstad, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Joyce of 
   Pennsylvania, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Kustoff, and Mr. Meuser) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
 relating to ``Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-
                     4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Amendment to 
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128'' 
(89 Fed. Reg. 32346 (April 25, 2024)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.2








SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION


AMEREN
      ENERGY GENERATING COMPANY


(required
      by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002)








In
      connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
      30, 2006 of Ameren Energy Generating Company (the “Registrant”) as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
      10-Q"), each undersigned officer of the Registrant does hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.








Dated:
      November 9, 2006














/s/
      R.
      Alan
      Kelley


R.
      Alan
      Kelley


President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)














/s/
      Warner L.
      Baxter


Warner
      L.
      Baxter


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
# C_2020254EN.01000301.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

31 July 2020

(2020/C 254/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1848 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4442 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90053 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2835 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0769 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 160,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7323 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,175 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 344,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4034 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8315 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,2595 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6488 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5898 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1825 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7771 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6245 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 409,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,0960 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2637 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4815 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 364,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0230 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,124 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,6900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,948 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,1219 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 26,2780 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,6355 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1848

JPY

Japanese yen

124,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4442

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90053

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2835

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0769

ISK

Iceland króna

160,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7323

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,175

HUF

Hungarian forint

344,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4034

RON

Romanian leu

4,8315

TRY

Turkish lira

8,2595

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6488

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5898

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1825

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7771

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6245

KRW

South Korean won

1 409,56

ZAR

South African rand

20,0960

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2637

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4815

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 364,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0230

PHP

Philippine peso

58,124

RUB

Russian rouble

87,6900

THB

Thai baht

36,948

BRL

Brazilian real

6,1219

MXN

Mexican peso

26,2780

INR

Indian rupee

88,6355

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2018218EN.01000501.xml

| 22.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 June 2018

(2018/C 218/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1538 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4520 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87370 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3248 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1496 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 126,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4253 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,863 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 326,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3256 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6723 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,4754 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5664 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5381 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0528 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6846 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5714 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 280,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7580 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4977 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3790 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 261,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6331 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,637 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,5577 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,995 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3567 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5286 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,4145 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1538

JPY

Japanese yen

127,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4520

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87370

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3248

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1496

ISK

Iceland króna

126,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4253

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,863

HUF

Hungarian forint

326,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3256

RON

Romanian leu

4,6723

TRY

Turkish lira

5,4754

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5664

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5381

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0528

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6846

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5714

KRW

South Korean won

1 280,79

ZAR

South African rand

15,7580

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4977

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3790

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 261,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6331

PHP

Philippine peso

61,637

RUB

Russian rouble

73,5577

THB

Thai baht

37,995

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3567

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5286

INR

Indian rupee

78,4145

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certifications**
I, Leldon E. Echols, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Centex Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: February 9, 2004   /s/ LELDON E. ECHOLSLeldon E. Echols  Chief Financial Officer
#### Brown *vs.*Wylie & Company.

Where, on a money rule against the sheriff for the distribution of funds in his hands amongst executions against a defendant *infi. fa.,*the court orders payment to some to the exclusion of others, the sheriff is a necessary party defendant to a bill of exceptions filed to such judgment. *Bird, admix, vs. Ea/rris, ex'r,*63 *Qa.,*433.

Parties. Practice in the Supreme Court. September Term, 1879.

Kennedy, sheriff of Bartow county, under order, brought into court $140.18, the proceeds of property of Daniels, de*436fendant *vnfi.fa.,*for distribution. Brown and Wylie & Co. claimed the fund, the former under a mortgage *fi.fa.,*and the latter under justice court executions, The court gave precedence to the latter, and Brown excepted. The bill of exceptions was, served only on Wylie & Co. When the case was called in this court, a motion'was made to dismiss the writ of error because the sheriff, Kennedy, was a necessary party and had not been served. The motion was sustained, as indicated in the head-note.

G. H. Bates; Julius L. Brown, for plaintiff in error.

Akin’& Akin, for defendants.
326.602-2 Restrictions on the use of the Buy Indian Act. ( a ) IHS may not use the authority of the Buy Indian Act and the procedures contained in this subpart to award intergovernmental contracts to Tribal organizations to plan, operate, or administer authorized IHS programs (or parts thereof) that are within the scope and intent of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) (Pub. L. 93-638). IHS must use the Buy Indian Act solely to award procurement contracts to IEEs. Contracts subject to ISDEAA are not covered under the FAR and are codified separately under 25 CFR part 900 and 42 CFR part 137.
( b ) Contract health services (referred to administratively as Purchased/Referred Care services) are defined at 25 U.S.C. 1603 as excluding services provided by Buy Indian Act contractors. Accordingly, the Buy Indian Act may not be used to obtain services through the Purchased/Referred Care program (previously Contract Health Services). Purchase orders for care authorized pursuant to 42 CFR part 136 subpart C may be issued without regard to the provisions of this Part.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 26

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
            approving the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

  Mr. Clyde (for himself, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Wilson of South 
Carolina, Mr. Mike Garcia of California, Mr. Pfluger, Mr. Allen, Mr. C. 
Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. Babin, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Self, 
     Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Cline, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Johnson of 
   Louisiana, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Green of 
  Tennessee, Mr. Biggs, and Mr. Comer) submitted the following joint 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
            approving the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-789), enacted by the 
Council of the District of Columbia on January 17, 2023, and 
transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of the District 
of Columbia Home Rule Act on January 27, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020279EN.01000101.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2020/C 279/01)

Last publication

OJ C 271, 17.8.2020

Past publications

OJ C 262, 10.8.2020

OJ C 255, 3.8.2020

OJ C 247, 27.7.2020

OJ C 240, 20.7.2020

OJ C 230, 13.7.2020

OJ C 222, 6.7.2020

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 424.203 Policy.

USDA regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act are found in 7 CFR, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart A. Contracting officers shall follow these regulations when responding to requests for information.

[70 FR 48, Jan. 3, 2005]
Exhibit
      32.4








SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF


AMEREN
      ENERGY GENERATING COMPANY


(required
      by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002)








In
      connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
      31, 2007 of Ameren Energy Generating Company (the “Registrant”) as
      filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), each undersigned officer of the Registrant does
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.










Date:
      May
      10, 2007










/s/
      R.
      Alan
      Kelley


R.
      Alan
      Kelley


President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)











/s/
      Warner L.
      Baxter


Warner
      L.
      Baxter


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
# C_2017329EN.01001201.xml

| 30.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/12

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 329/09)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Lithuania

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Vilnius

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows a fragment of the Vilnius city panorama. At the left side is the inscription ‘VILNIUS’ and the mark of the designer. At the top right is the name of the issuing country ‘LIETUVA’ and the year of issuance ‘2017’. At the centre is the mintmark.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : Third quarter of 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---