Before The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Public Hearings on EPA's Proposed 

Clean Power Plan 

August 1, 2014 

William S. Moorhead Federal Building 

Pittsburgh PA 

Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013 0602 

Comments of Ed Good, Legislative Director 

Utility Workers Union of America AFL-CIO 

56080 Matts Lane 

Shadyside, OH 43947 

740 312-8411 cell 

egood(&,uwua.net 

www.UWUA.net 
Comments of Ed Good, Legislative Director UWUA AFL-CIO 

Good morning, I want to thank you for this opportunity to provide thoughts 

and comments on the EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan. 

My name is Ed Good. I am the Legislative Director for the Utility Workers 

Union of America AFL-CIO. The UWUA represents 50,000 employees in the 

electric generation, distribution and other utility industries. The UWUA 

strongly supports an all of the above energy strategy as opposed to an all but 

one of the above policy. 

My comments today are not limited to my role as a UWUA member, but also 

as an elected local government official and consumer. 

First and foremost, I am a proud member of the UWUA for over 35 years. 

The majority of those years I primarily worked in a coal fired power plant. 

My first 30 plus years was spent at the FirstEnergy R.E. Burger Plant in 

Mead Township, Belmont County Ohio. On February 23, 1995 100 persons 

lost their jobs when Units 1 and 2 were deactivated due to compliance issues 

with the Clean Air Act and Amendments. On November 17, 2010 some 15 

years later it was announced Units 3, 4 and 5 would be shut down...again due 

to the cost of environmental compliance. 

Due to today's hearing schedule and format there simply is not enough time to 

properly convey the impact these and other unit closures has on employees, 

the community and local services. 

Having taken office in 1996, I am currently a Township Trustee in Mead 

Township, where the Burger Plant is located. The negative impact that takes 

place when a plant closes is devastating. Local government along with other 

services such as libraries, schools, health, park and fire districts suffer or in 

some cases are simply eliminated. I have attached a report detailing the loss of 

over 1.68 million dollars to the Shadyside Local School District and over a 

$146,000 loss to Mead Township as a result of the Burger plant closure. 

Understanding the need to address global climate change, it is just that... a 

global challenge. The absence of border adjustments on goods produced in 

high carbon low control countries should not and cannot be ignored. Regions, 

like here in Appalachia cannot be expected to bear the costs of solutions to 

this global challenge alone. 
Shakeb Afsah, an economist who runs an energy consulting firm recently 

stated: "Energy exports bit by bit are chipping away at gains we are making 

on carbon dioxide domestically." 

Another issue that cannot be ignored is the problem of methane emissions 

from natural gas distribution pipelines. Last month, U.S. EPA Office of 

Inspector General issued a report detailing the improvements needed in the 

EPA's efforts to address those emissions. 

The EPA Inspector General noted the following on page one of that report: 

" Methane is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG). It has a global warming 

potential of 25 times that of carbon dioxide. In addition to contributing 

to global climate change, methane emissions also worsen ground level 

ozone problems and can kill trees and other vegetation. Emissions from 

leaks in natural gas distribution pipelines are comprised almost entirely 

of methane." 

The U.S. EPA, other regulators and federal agencies need to address this 

complex issue with a coordinated approach. Working with DOE to advance 

Carbon Capture Sequestration, DOL needs to address the displaced worker 

issue and FERC concerning electric power reliability and security are just a 

few examples of the coordination that will be necessary to effectively deal with 

the problem of greenhouse gas emissions in the power industry. Stakeholders, 

especially those expected to be impacted the most, must have a seat at the 

table in this process. 

In closing, the UWUA would also like to urge the EPA to extend the comment 

period by at least 60 additional days in order to allow all interested parties to 

file comments concerning EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan. 

Thank you for your time and attention. 

Ed Good 

56080 Matts Lane 

Shadyside, OH 43947 
740 312-8411 cell 

egood@uwua.net 
NJ 

0 

1-` 6..) 

IN) 

CD 

,-` N....) 

IN...) 

0 

1-, 

IN-) 

0 

c:::) 

IN..) 

0 

0 ‘,0 

IN.) 

CC 

0 

00 

NJ 

0 

0 .....„1 

IN.) 

0 

CC ct.. 

NJ 

0 

0 

(ANJ 

0 

0 

C.) 

0 

0 L,..) 

IV 

0 

0 t._) 

k..) 

0 

0 .-L 

IN...) 

0 

0 c) 

1--, 

\C) 

`O 

,,c) 

■

\C) 

-■ 

`O 00 

\rD 

-.-■ 

`O ...„1 

■--. 

\C) 

\ 0 

c:s. 

1---, 

\C) 

\ 0 LA 

■---, 

\C) 

\ 0 

.p 

1--, 

\C) 

,C) (..4.) 

,-, 

\C 

`O 

INJ 

■

\C) rQ 

1--` 

--, 

\C ■.rQ 

C> 

■

\C) 

-■ 

00 

\ C 

.-.

\C

■ 

, 00 

00 

1--, 

\C 

00 --..,1 

\C) 

00 

cs• 

o• M 

::: 

►1 

ft 

Z 

o 

..., 

ft 

a 

o 

....„ 

ft 

2: 

o 

...., 

ft 

a 

o 

...... 

ft 

a 

o 

H. 

ft 

a 

o 

M 

a 

 o 

..... 

MeadTownship 

M 

a 

o 

..... 

M 

Z 

 o 

..., 

M 

Z 

 o 

....„ 

MeadTownship MeadTownship MeadTownship Mead Township 

[MeadTownship 

M 

Z 

o 

.... il... 

MeadTownship 

IMeadTownship 

MeadTownship 

M 

Z 

o 

-., 

.,.z). • 

T

MeadTownsh p i

M 

o 

.., 

rt) 

 t 

z,, 

ZQZZZ 

M 

 o 

....., 

M 

 o 

....., 

M 

 o 

..... 

M 

 o 

..... 

Taxi

ng District 

69 

N 

V.> 

-CD 

CT 

0 

.0 W 

CD 

0) 

0 

69 

T.) 

VD 

0 

CD 

C> 

''.0 L..) 

CD 

0 

CD 

$26,710,20

0.00 

69 

T.) 

CT 

0 

\ 0 CA 

-P 

N 

0 

0) 

0 

69 

T..) 

CT 

0 

N...) 0 

CT 

c.r) 

0 

0 

0 

$25,396,10

0.00 

69 

N 

to 

CD 

CT 01 

1../) 

0 

0 

0) 

0 

$2

4,691,600.00 

69 

,-, 

■C) 

"----.1 

---.1 

,--

00 

■ 

.- 

CD 

0 

0 

$ 19,245,840.00 

$1

8,887,490.00 

69 

.-• 

.----1 

'CT 

I \ ..) ∎-∎ 

0 

4 

CD 

0 

0 

$1

7,489,180.00 

69 

,...., 

----I 

1...) 

Z) 0 

CT (../) 

0 

0 

0 

$1

3,672,490.00 

69 

- 

La 

'IP 

01 0 

0 

T...) 

0 

0) 

CD 

69 

.., 

(4.) 

-CD 

t \-) CT 

CT 

0 

0 

0 

0 

$12,34

7,160.00 

$12,204,780.00 

69 

-• 

N 

0 

CT vi 

■.0 (../1 

0 

:2) 

C> 

69 

.--, 

-N 

01 

.--, 

-,--• L..) 

CD) 

0 

0 

69 

'bc u) 

0 

'-.c: •-....1 

0 

CD 

$9,589,620.00 

0 

69 

"0 

oo 

`O 

VI 

0 

0 

CD 

69 

IP 

0 

Ch 

1J-1 

CT 

0 

CO 

69 

"N 

4 

VC, 

0 

0 

0 

CO 

$9,642,370.00 $9,513,780.00 

Agricultural& 

Resi

dentialReal 

Estate 

69 

-1=• 

00 

VI 

C> 

CD 

69 

ST 

.-' 

-I=. 

C1 

C> 

0 

69 

CA 

"---...1 

CC 

LA 

00 

C> 

0 

$12,02

0,850.00 

69 

.--., 

NJ 

0 

0 

'-.U.) 

t_fl 

C> 

C> 

$1

2,99

6,100.00 

69 

(..,) 

■- 

'CD 

•0 

'.0 

IN..) 

C> 

CD 

69 

.--.., 

U.) 

"CD 

01 

'01 

W 

C> 

0 

$12,744,21

0.00 

$12,743,890.00 $12,68

8,050.00 

$12,61

8,840.00 

69 

,--. 

IN.) 

CT 

---1 

\C) 

00 

C> 

C> 

$12,600,770.00 

69 

6.) 

•-••■ 

"--...) 

0 

1-, 

00 

C> 

0 

$13,552,460.00 

69 

6.) 

•-■ 

1.11 

--...) 

'CC 

-...1 

C> 

CD 

69 1.--, 

U..) 

I_A 

U.) 

"C71 

VD 

C> 

0 

$13,515,91

0.00 

$13,472,770.00 $12,353,790.00 $12,288,840.00 $12,330,860.00 $ 12,270,250.00 $12,337,200.00 $1

2,295,950.00 

69 

IN.) 

■- 

U.) 

0 

-P 

'N..) 

00 

C> 

0 

69 

■--. 

NJ 

‹) 

k.) 

'01 

-..1 

C> 

0 

AllOth

er Real 

Estate 

69 

c./.1 

0 

CT 

'CT 

CT• 

0 

0 

0 

69 

(J) 

oc) 

‹.") 

Do 

oo 

0 

0 

CO 

$

6,313,410.00 

69 

■-• 

VD 

-.---.1 (.../1 

.- 

.. 

00 

■-• 

0 

0 

0 

69 

NJ 

N 

"

-• 

O

t.4..) 

■ 

. 

---..1 

---.1 

0 

0) 

0 

69 

NJ 

0 

0 

,-- 

_p. 

.. 

00 

CT 

0 

0) 

0 

■

r,a 

■

-• 

.C) 

•...0 

NJ 

cp. 

.. 

(J) 

■-• 

CD 

0. 

0 

$19,264,450.00 $1

7,657,580.00 

$16,997,290.00 $ 17,550,170.00 $16,588,42

0.00 

- 

CT 

0 

-• 

----1 

'L.) 

-• 

CD 

0 

0 

69 

u.) 

,.....1 

,--.• 

-.I 

0 

I.)) 

c4.) 

0 

C> 

0 

69 

(...) 

VD 

0 

LA 

IV 

"<;) 

p 

0 

0) 

0 

$38,608,24

0.00 

$39,724,420.00 $39,768,760.00 $48,086,520.00 $49,885,410.00 $4

7,487,400.00 

$44,499,970.00 $39,364,290.00 

69 

t.4.) 

--I 

1../1 

0 

CT 

IP 

u.) 

C) 

.0 

CD 

$34,524,100.00 $33,59

0,520.00 

69 L,„) 

-P 

"D ......3 

■.Cj 

l■-) 

(../1 

C) 

.0 

CD 

69 

L..) 

..--.1 

'CT 

,,T..) 

■-• 

0 

0 

.0 

CD 

Public Utility 

Personal 

69 

0 

0 

0 

69 

CD 

0 

0, 

69 

CO 

0 

0 

69 

CD 

0 

0) 

69 

CD 

0) 

CD 00.0$ 

69 

CD 

CD 

CD 

69 

C). 

0 

0 

69 

CD 

. 

CD 

CD 

69 

NJ 

,--` 

CT 

-1=. 

. 

C) 

VD 

0 

0 

0 

be 

N 

0 

- 

■.C) 

. 

0 

0 

0 

0 

CD 

69 

N 

--` 

.-• 

0o 

., 

CT 

00 

0) 

0) 

0 

$2,343,580.00 

69 

N 

CD 

CT 

-1=. 

4.) 

NJ 

0 

CC) 

0 

$2,54

3,420.00 

69 

N 

'IN.) 

VD (J) 

00 

T...) 

0 

0) 

0 

$2,682,44

0.00 

., 

69 

N 

0 

O

VD 

■ 

.- 

vl 

CD

• CD 

CD 

'9S 

,,c) 

coo 

-,...,1

.._.1 

c) 

• CD 

p 

$472,395.00 $34

6,474.00 _

$392,330.00 

69 

0 

4=, 

(J) 

1= 

0 

C> 

69 

,C) 

Z) 

■-• 

1= 

0 

0 

be 

\C) 

00 

CT 

CT 

0 

0 

6/9 

C) 

00 vi 

- 

'-- 

'-- 

Z:) 0 

643 

..p 

,-` 

CT 

V.") 

I= 

CT 

0 

bS 

co 

NJ 

CT 

NJ 

0 

--.1 

0 

GeneralPersonal 

$3

9,453,34

0.00 

$4

0,43 7,770.00 

$38,729,19

0.00 I 

$5

7,868,080.00 

$6

0,634,770.00 

69 

00 

0 

........1 

CD 

CT 

0 

0 

0 

$58,002,030.00 

be 

CT 

,..,0 

\C) 

IN, 

01 

00 

CD 

0 

0 

69 

C) 

,-. 

----I 6..) 

C1 

C) 

0 

0 

CD 

$51,151,110.00 $51,144,710.00 

69 

00 

\O 

-P 

CT 

‘..fD 

00 

CC 

0 

CC 

$4

8,488,050.00 

$6

9,22

6,270.00 

$68,96

8,990.00 

$67,916,54

0.00 

$68,970,530.00 

69 

........1 

--..1 

00 

--.1 

CT 

0 

0 CD 

$74,4

0

5,980.00 

$75,896,525.00 $70,448,794.00 $67,031,810.00 ■ $61,689,31

0.00 

$59,2

65,320.00 

69 

01 

01 

CT 

CT 

Vi 

N 

CC 

0 

0 

$56,22

0,580.00 

$57,34

2,84

6.00 

$60,244,757.00 

Total 

-$984,430.00 

69 

1 

0 

00 

Ot: 

0 O o 

-$19,138,890.00 I 

69 

IN) 

‘...,4 

CT 

cr 

:> c) 

,:=, •

o 

69 

I \ ..) 

NJ 

" ----) '' 

'-' C> • o c) 

69 

c) 

f)) 

- O 0L..) 

0 

o • 

c, 

69 

._, 

0 

© \ 0 

,, 

(), 

0 • o o 

I $6,81

9,080.00 I 

-$977,51

0.00 

$

6,400.00 

69 

I \ _) 

\C) 

----..) 

"-......1 

(....) 

0 O o 

I $458,930.00 I I -$20,738,22

0.00 

I $257,280.00 I $1,052,450.00 

"C) 

VI 

6,) 

"\C) 

.CD 

0 O o 0 

- 

$1,251,770.00 

69 

CT 

"CT 

00 

•---1 

IN...) 

IV 

0 

o o 

69 

"-I=, 

0 

'LA 

-1=, Li, O o 

$

5,44

7,731.00 

$3,416,984.00 

.69 

-, N 

"0-1 

0 

0 O o 

$2,423,990.00 

'W 

$2,598,800.00 

tii 

'VC 

0 O o 

I 

69 ■-, 

t.,.) 

" 

(> c", O o 

-$2,901,911.00 

Difference from 

Previous Year 
Mead Township 

The State of Ohio (Senate Bill 3) deregulated public utilities on power generating plants resulting 

in a reduction of taxable value on power generating plants. This resulted in a loss of revenue for 

Mead Township. 

1. General Fund: $8,509.01 

2. Road & Bridge Fund: $53,181.33 

Total: $61,690.34 

The State of Ohio phased out general personal property tax. 

This effected all types of machinery, equipment and inventory. 

This resulted in a loss of revenue for Mead Township. 

1. General Fund: 

2. Road & Bridge Fund: 

Total: 

$856.64 

$7,574.32 

$8,430.96 

First Energy shut down their Burger plant in Dilles Bottom (Mead Township). 

This resulted in a loss of revenue from Public Utility Personal Property taxes for Mead 

Township. 

Andrew L. Sutak 

Auditor 

Secretary of Budget Commission 

Secretary of Board of Revision 

BELMONT COUNTY 

Auditor's Office 

101 West Main Street, St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950 

www.belmontcountyohio.org/auditor.htm 

Auditor & Fiscal (740) 699-2130 

Real Estate & Appraisal (740) 699-2132 

Deed Transfer (740) 699-2136 

Manufactured Homes (740) 699-2131 

Dog/Kennel License (740) 699-2131 

Vendor License (740) 699-2131 

Weights & Measures (740) 699-2132 

Fax (740) 699-2165 

• 2001 

• 2005 

• 2011 

1. General Fund: $5,375.36 

2. Road & Bridge Fund: $47,034.40 

Total: $52.409.76 

Also, on the real estate side the Burger plant had to be reduced because of 

non-operations as a public utility. This resulted in a loss of revenue from Real Estate taxes for 

Mead Township. 

3. General Fund: $5,375.36 

4. Road & Bridge Fund: $47,034.40 

Total: $52.409.76 

Total Revenue Reduction from all Real Estate, General Personal, Deregulation on 

Public Utility, and finally Public Utility Value loss from plant shut down equals: 

$146 339.63 

*NOTE: NO OTHER TYPE OF REVENUE REPLACED THESE LOSSES. 
00'000'000'5LS 

00'000'000'017$ 00'000'000'5ES 

00'000'000'SSS 00'000'000'08$ 00'000'000'0LS 00'000'000'59$ 00'000,000'09$ 00'000'000'517$ 00'000'000'05$ 

ETOZ ZTOZ -HOZ OTOZ 600Z 8002 LOOK 900Z SOOZ 1700Z £00Z ZOOZ TOOZ 000Z 666T 866T L661 966T S66T 17661 £661 Z661 T66T 066T 686T 886T L861 986T 

ciNsumoi peaty 
N 

CD 

•--, 

LA) 

N.) 

CD 

r.) 

f......) 

CD 

■-• 

,-- 

kJ 

0 

,-, © 

NJ 

0 

0 "C 

NJ 

0 

0 

00 

INJ 

0 

0 

---.1 

kJ 

CD 

CD 

c:31 

NJ 

CD 

CD 

(A 

kJ 

CD 

CD 

-P 

k.) 

CD 

0 

t••■•) 

t.J 

0 

0 

k.) 

I‘J 

0 

CD 

■--' 

N-..) 

0 

CD 

0 

,--- 

z) 

,S::) 

,-, 

‹D 

‹;) 

00 

■-•- .-• 

----.1 

■-• 

\ID 

.1:D 

CT 

■-• 

∎O 

"C 

(11 

1-• 

v:) 

-1=, 

■-• 

‹;) 

r;:) 

LO 

•--, 

‹D 

■O 

t•-.) 

,--, 

‹:, 

1.--' 

,--, 

.C) 

0 

,---• 

00 

,..0 

■-• 

.rD 

(Do 

00 

∎-• 

00 

----.1 

■-• 

.C) 

oo 

C1 

o< ft 

A:. 

.n 

Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD 

Shadyside LSD 

Shadyside LSD 

Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD 

Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD 

Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD 

Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD Shadyside LSD 

Taxi

ng District 

$6

2,778,750.00 

$62,736,240.00 

00.08C S66`LS$ 

$57,366,31

0.00 

$57,273,660.00 $56,713,430.00 $56,411,410.00 $56,040,670.00 

69 

-F, 

, CT 

oo ,-,., ) 

.--` 

, 

CT 

---.1 

© 

0 

0 

$46,30

0,450.00 

69 

-1=, 

ON 

, 

0 

oo 

00 

N 

CD 

CD 

0 

CD 

$42,863,21

0.00 

69 4 N.) 

. 

---.1 

CD 

— 

CT 

■0 

00 

0 

0 

CD 

69 

-I=. k..) 

. 

CT (...J 

---) 

----3 (A 

0 

OD 

CD 

$35,218,880.00 

°WO

O

L' I I 6`17 £$ 

69 l.,,) 

-4=, 

IP 

0 

'--.) 

ON 

•.--, 

0 

CD 

0 

69 

(..■,) 

••--., 

. 

■-• 

CT 

0 

00 

-4. 

CD 

0 

CD 

69 Lo 

0 

,. Oo 

0 

CT 

'...0 

0 

CD 

CD 

$30,558,02

0.00 

$26,704,280.00 $2

6,31

0,420.00 

$25,946,310.00 $25,403,440.00 

$25,6

93,130.00 

$25,512,680.00 $25,813,560.00 

69 

1•,-) (..A 

ON 

----1 

0 

ON 

0 

0 

OD 

CD 

Agricultural& 

Resi

dential Real 

Estate 

$10,528,450.00 

69 

,-, 

,N..) 

,--, 

0 1■.) 

"---1 

CD 

■- 

0 

0 

$11,488,330.00 $1

7,824,030.00 

$18,02

6,44

0.00 

$1

9,370,4

9

0.00 

$19,376,270.00 $19,391,790.00 

-EA 

-- 

oo 

(..A 

00 

4=, 

----.1 

Ltt 

CD 

0 

0 

$18,582,300.00 

EA — 

oo 

■-• 

L..-) 

'J..) 

LA 

VA 

CD 

0 

0 

69 

,-- 

----1 

oo 

L.J 

LA 

" (.11 

(J) 

CD 

0 

CD 

69 

-- 

-----J 

, 

oo 

R.) 

(...A 

' ki 

SD 

CD 

0 

CD 

$17,814,39

0.00 

$1

7,785,26

0.00 

$17,466,320.00 

EA 

,-, 

----1 

k) 

(J) 

ca) 

C 1-, 

CD 

0 

CD 

$17,221,350.00 

69 ■-• 

,..---1 

■-• 

‹) c.,) 

00 

---.1 

0 

0 

CD 

69 

,-- 

---1 

'NJ 

C; \ 

00 ■- 

CT 

CD 

*CD 

0 

$15,640,830.00 

69 

,-- 

LA 

'Oo 

N.) 

..... 

0 

CT 

0 

OD 

CD 

$15,70

7,30

0.00 

69 

. 

c..A 

ON ON 

•-- 

--A 

CD 

0 

CD 

\ C $15,449,960.00 

$15,337,650.00 

EA 

....., 

v) 

L.-) 

ON 

00 

'00 

LA 

0 

0 

0 

$15,228,390.00 

All Other Real 

Estate 

$6,886,680.00 

$6,449,110.00 

69 

--I 

c.,J 

vD 

\.0 

ON ---) 

0 

0 

0 

...s 

0 "._ , 

N - 

c.A 

'b.\ 

ON 

0 

b 

0 

$23,370,51

0.00 

$20,59

7,600.00 

$20,488,790.00 

69 

.CO 

".C) t.) 

00 

00 

CD 

0 

0 

0 

$18,320,870.00 

69 

--...I 

"ON C 

00 

■-• 

-P 

0 

0 

0 

69 

oo 

'NJ 

0 \,.0 

---I 

(..,.) 

0 

0 

0 

EA 

.--,A 

'N...) 

0 

0o 

' O 

C) 

0 

0 

0 

$16,599,110.00 $3

7,871,640.00 

$39,91

0,470.00 

$39,598,230.00 $4

0,708,960.00 

69 

4 CD 

"---) — 

Li) 

. 

,-.- 

00 

0 

0 

0 

69 

-1=, 

\.0 

CD (..A 

---.1 

.. 

--I 

I \ ..) 

0 

0 

0 

69 

LA 

0 

"v::) 

0 L..) 

. 

<11 

0 

0 

0 

0 

$4

8,785,570.00 

69 

.1=, (_A 

"•••-1 

ON 

'NJ 

4=. 

0 

0 

0 

$40,672,680.00 

EA c.,,.) 

oo 

ON 

CD L.-) 

'C 

— 

0 

0 

0 

69 (....) 

LA 

CD kJ 

- 

u--) 

--. 

0 

0 

0 

69 (...) 

4 

, 

CD (...,) 

-.....1 

, 

1L, 

,..0 

0 

0 

0 

$35,423,29

0.00 

$38,020,570.00 

Public Utility 

Personal 

EA 

0 

0 

CD 

69 

CD 

0 

0 

EA 

0 

0 

CD 

EA 

CD 

0 

0 

EA 

CD 

0 

0 

69 

CD 

0 

0 

69 

CD 

0 

0 

69 

CD 

0 

CD 

69 

CD 

CD 

CD 

69 

.4=, 

ON 

0 

-1=, 

,-• 

NJ 0 

0 0 

$4,913,750.00 

69 LA 

--..1 N..) 

■

-F• 

C 

-F. 0 

0 0 

$5,399,610.00 

Ef3 

(.../) 

-1=, 

LA 

NJ 

00 

k..) 0 

0 0 

69 

CA 

N.J 

0 L..) 

\..O N...) 0 

0 0 

69 

..1,.. 

L.) 

--I z) 

P 

LA 0 

0 0 

$4,472,250.00 

69 (.,..) 

ON 

-.-.1 

0 

-A W 0 

0 0 

$2,023,090.00 

69 

,-- 

. 

ON 

ON 

■.0 

"0 cT 

w 

0 0 

69 

,-- 

. 

∎-• 

-1=• 

-I=• 

A 0 0 

0 0 

$1,715,740.00 $1,900,78

7.00 

EA — 

. 

,..0 

-•...1 

•C 

0 

‹:, ----.1 

0 0 

$2,153,170.00 $3,668,560.00 

69 

kJ 

, 

-, 

CD 

LA 

‹D 0 

0 0 

$3,332,233.00 

General Personal 

$80,193,88

0.00 

C

-69

o 

lN..) 0.0 

00 

"CD 

ON 

0 

CD 

0 

$76,883,780.00 

69 .0, c..)) 

■.0 — 

ON 

0 

CD 

0 

CD 

$98,670,610.00 

EA <::) cT 

-CT 00 

∎-• 

. ul 

NJ 

CD 

0 

CD 

69 'C cT 

-NJ ----) ON 

_p 

---I 

CD 

0 

CD 

$95,361,26

0.00 

$83,73

7,290.00 

69 0,0 ,---.1 

—, (A (..A 

CD 

0 

0 

0 

$8

7,345,230.00 

$83,632,300.00 $82,530,990.00 

-6.9 

,—, 

0 

w 

---.1 

-....1 

'ON 

0 

CD 

0 

$98,118,530.00 $96,355,70

0.00 

$96,844,430.00 

$92,768,100.00 

ON 

$99,081,670.00 

$100,412,243.00 

$92,275,180.00 

69 00 <:) 

-cT .4=. (..,-) 

'IP CT 

CD 

OD 

0 

$84,22

7,077.00 

$81,648,117.00 

69 ---.1 

oc 

w 

NJ 

CD 

c.A 

--A 

0 

CD c) 

$78,556,880.00 $78,707,2

9

0.00 

$82,251,793.00 

Total 

$1,094,180.00 

$

4,404,280.00 

6a 

,--+ 

:0 

L..) 

'N.,) 

NJ 

CD 

0 

CD 

$2,754,610.00 

69 

,--. 

00 

,SD 

•--, 

‘C © 

,...„ 

.--' 0 

69 

© 

(.11 

' . CD (../) 

0 

• 0 

CD 

69 

— 

t_li 

, NJ 

-• 

0 

• 

CD 

0 

69

-" 

t‘,..) 

u-) 

',,c) 

-..„1 

C) 

c) 

0 

$3,41

7,72

0.00 

4

■

os 

C) 

0 

1‘.) 

N.) 

p 

0 

CD 

$3,71

2,930.00 

69 

,--, 

0 1-

.,) 

■ 

, 

0 

C) 

CD 

-$21,245,610.00 

$5,658,070.00 

69 

.-■ 

CT 

k.) 

00 (....) 

CD 

0 

CD 

$488,730.00 

Cr, 

I $

4,076,330.00 

fos ..,.) 

.--+ 

(..,.) 

"LA 

---.1 

0 

CD 

r -$1,330,573.00 $8,137,063.00 

$2,631,72

0.00 

$5,416,383.00 

69 

----.1 

00 

‘.0 

ON 

0 

OD 

CD 

$3,32

7,54

7.00 

$236,31

0.00 

(..A 

0 

1=• 

.- 

p 

aD 

CD 

$3,544,503.00 

Difference from 

P

r

evi

ous Year 

UQ 

O 

;•3 z 

O 

Fr 

z 
Andrew L. Sutak 

Auditor 

Secretary of Budget Commission 

Secretary of Board of Revision 

BELMONT COUNTY 

Auditor's Office 

101 West Main Street, St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950 

www.belmontcountyohio.org/auditor.htm 

Auditor & Fiscal (740) 699-2130 

Real Estate & Appraisal (740) 699-2132 

Deed Transfer (740) 699-2136 

Manufactured Homes (740) 699-2131 

Dog/Kennel License (740) 699-2131 

Vendor License (740) 699-2131 

Weights & Measures (740) 699-2132 

Fax (740) 699-2165 

• 2001 

• 2005 

• 2011 

Shadyside Local School District 

The State of Ohio (Senate Bill 3) deregulated public utilities on power generating plants resulting 

in a reduction of taxable value on power generating plants. This resulted in a loss of revenue for 

Mead Township. 

1. General Fund: $677,530.08 

2. Permanent Improvement Fund: $95,726.39 

Total: $773,256.47 

The State of Ohio phased out general personal property tax. 

This effected all types of machinery, equipment and inventory. 

This resulted in a loss of revenue for Mead Township. 

1. General Fund: $146,641.22 

2. Permanent Improvement Fund: $20,718.54 

Total: $167,359.76 

First Energy shut down their Burger plant in Dilles Bottom (Mead Township). 

This resulted in a loss of revenue from Public Utility Personal Property taxes for Mead 

Township. 

1. General Fund: $454,708.12 

2. Permanent Improvement Fund: $64,244.48 

Total: $518,952.60 

Also, on the real estate side the Burger plant had to be reduced because of 

non-operations as a public utility. This resulted in a loss of revenue from Real Estate taxes for 

Mead Township. 

3. General Fund: $201,792.05 

4. Permanent Improvement Fund: $28,510.65 

Total: $230,302.70 

Total Revenue Reduction from all Real Estate, General Personal, Deregulation on 

Public Utility, and finally Public Utility Value loss from plant shut down equals: 

$1,689,871.53 

*NOTE: NO OTHER TYPE OF REVENUE REPLACED THESE LOSSES. 
) 

- 

00'000'000'501S 

00'000'000'00-E S 

00'000'000'56$ 

00'000'000'06$ 

00'000'000'68$ 

00'000'000'08$ 

00'000'000'SLS 

ETOZ ZTOZ TTOZ OTOZ 600Z 8002 LON 9002 SOH VOOZ £00Z ZOOZ ION 000Z 666T 866T L66I 966T S66T V661 £661 Z661 T661 066T 686T 886T L861 986T 

13!J1s!CIloopslepoi apsApeqs