alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 614 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 100 

[Report No. 118–727] 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange 

Commission relating to ‘‘Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2023 

Mr. GARBARINO (for himself, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. NUNN of Iowa, and Mr. 

BARR) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

NOVEMBER 1, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Mr. GREEN of Tennessee, Mr. LAWLER, and Mr. 

FITZGERALD

NOVEMBER 1, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to 

‘‘Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, 

and Incident Disclosure’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 100 RH 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Se4 curities and Exchange Commission relating to ‘‘Cyberse5 curity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Inci6 dent Disclosure’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 51896 (August 4, 2023)), 

7 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 614 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 100 

[Report No. 118–727] 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapsure’’. ment, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclo- mission relating to ‘‘Cybersecurity Risk Manage- submitted by the Securities and Exchange Com- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

NOVEMBER 1, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### 36.514 Availability and use of utility services.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-14, Availability and Use of Utility Services, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated, the contract is to be performed on Government sites, and the contracting officer decides (a) that the existing utility system(s) is adequate for the needs of both the Government and the contractor, and (b) furnishing it is in the Government's interest. When this clause is used, the contracting officer shall list the available utilities in the contract.
332.703-1 General. ( b ) The following requirements govern all solicitations and contracts using incremental funding, as appropriate: ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall consider the estimated total cost of the contract, including all planned increments of performance when determining the requirements that must be met before contract execution (e.g., Justification and Approvals, clearances, and approvals).
( 2 ) The solicitation and resultant contract shall include a statement of work or performance work statement that describes the total project, covers all proposed increments of performance, and contains a schedule of planned increments of performance. No funding increment may exceed 1 year, and the services rendered during each increment of performance must provide a specific material benefit that can stand alone if the remaining effort is not funded. The resultant contract shall also include the corresponding amount of funds planned for obligation for each increment of performance.
( 3 ) The contracting officer shall request that offerors respond to the solicitation with technical and cost proposals for the entire project, and shall require distinct technical and cost break-outs of the planned increments of performance.
( 4 ) Proposals shall be evaluated and any discussions and negotiations shall be conducted based upon the total project, including all planned increments of performance.
#### 32.301 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Borrower* means a contractor, subcontractor (at any tier), or other supplier who receives a guaranteed loan.

*Federal Reserve Board* means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

*Guaranteed loan* or *V loan* means a loan, revolving credit fund, or other financial arrangement made pursuant to Regulation V of the Federal Reserve Board, under which the guaranteeing agency is obligated, on demand of the lender, to purchase a stated percentage of the loan and to share any losses in the amount of the guaranteed percentage.

*Guaranteeing agency* means any agency that the President has authorized to guarantee loans, through Federal Reserve Banks, for expediting national defense production.

[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2132, Jan. 10, 2001]
# Predominantly Black Institutions (PBI) Program - Competitive Grants 

# FY 2013 Awards
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 217 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 217

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services relating to ``Medicare Program; FY 2025 Hospice Wage 
  Index and Payment Rate Update, Hospice Conditions of Participation 
     Updates, and Hospice Quality Reporting Program Requirements''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2024

Mr. Palmer submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services relating to ``Medicare Program; FY 2025 Hospice Wage 
  Index and Payment Rate Update, Hospice Conditions of Participation 
     Updates, and Hospice Quality Reporting Program Requirements''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating 
to ``Medicare Program; FY 2025 Hospice Wage Index and Payment Rate 
Update, Hospice Conditions of Participation Updates, and Hospice 
Quality Reporting Program Requirements'' (89 Fed. Reg. 64202 (August 6, 
2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

To Be Announced

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
# C_2017143EN.01000102.xml

| 6.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8376 — BMW/Daimler/Ford/Porsche/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 143/02)

On 27 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8376. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8376. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8217-8219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02359]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Docket No. DHS-2021-0006]

Determination of a National Emergency Requiring Actions To 
Protect the Safety of Americans Using and Employed by the 
Transportation System

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In consultation with public health officials and consistent 
with the January 21, 2021 Executive Order on Promoting COVID-19 Safety 
in Domestic and International Travel and the January 29, 2021 Order by 
the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announcing a 
requirement for persons to wear masks while on conveyances and at 
transportation hubs, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security on 
January 27, 2021, issued a Declaration of a National Emergency 
Requiring Actions to Protect the Safety of Americans Using and Employed 
by the Transportation System (``declaration''). The declaration finds 
that a national emergency exists and directs the Transportation 
Security Administration to take certain actions to promote safety in 
and to secure the transportation system and to mitigate the spread of 
COVID-19 through the transportation system. The text of the declaration 
is set out below.

Christina E. McDonald,
Federal Register Liaison, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
BILLING CODE 9110-9M-P

[[Page 8218]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04FE21.000

[[Page 8219]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04FE21.001

[FR Doc. 2021-02359 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9M-C
```
Exhibit 10.2c
  [Full Name]:
 [amount]
 
    
    Your award (the Award) consists of shares of Restricted
Stock, par value $.25 per share, of Centex Corporation (the
Company). It is being made under the Centex Corporation
2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan).
    
    The restrictions in the Plan and this Award terminate on
August 1, 2011, unless they end at an earlier time as
described in the Plan or this Award. The date that the
restrictions terminate is called the Lapse Date. The
 shares of Restricted Stock will be freely transferable on
the day after the Lapse Date. You will forfeit your shares
if, before the Lapse Date, (i) you cease to be a director
for any reason or (ii) you engage in, or have an interest
(as stockholder, director, officer, employee, agent,
partner or otherwise) in, any entity that engages in any
business activity in the United States that the Company or
any of its Affiliates is engaged at any time from the date
of this Award to the date you cease to be a director. The
restriction in clause (ii) of this paragraph does not apply
if you own 1% or less of any class of equity securities of
a publicly traded entity, or if your participation or
interest in a business activity results in annual revenues
to you or that entity of $500,000 or less.
    
    The restrictions in the Plan and this Award terminate
immediately (i) upon your Retirement (as defined below),
(ii) if there is a Change in Control of the Company, or
(iii) if you die or incur a Disability. Retirement means
your Retirement (as defined in the Plan) (A) at the end of
your current term as director if you cannot stand for
re-election because you have reached the age of 70, or (B)
from the Board with the consent of a majority of the other
directors. Whether you have suffered a Disability will be
determined by the Committee. In the event of your death,
your shares will be transferred pursuant to your will or
the laws of descent and distribution and the recipients
will have all rights to the shares of Restricted Stock.
    
    This Award is subject to the Plan, and the Plan will
govern if there is any inconsistency between the Plan and
this Award. If you need a copy of the Plan, the Law
Department can provide one. The provisions of the Plan are
also provisions of this Award, and all terms, provisions
and, except as otherwise defined in this Award, the
definitions set forth in the Plan are incorporated in this
Award and made a part of this Award for all purposes.
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Award will
have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.
    
    This Award has been signed by the Company and delivered to
you, and (when you sign below) has been accepted by you
effective as of August 1, 2008.
 ACCEPTED BY GRANTEE
    
    CENTEX CORPORATION[Full Name]
    
    /s/ Timothy R. Eller

Timothy R. EllerChairman & Chief Executive Officer
#### 308.803 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.208-70, Printing and Duplication, in all solicitations, contracts, and orders over the simplified acquisition threshold, unless printing or increased duplication is authorized by statute.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 86 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas a carbon tax is a Federal tax on carbon released 

from fossil fuels; 

Whereas a carbon tax will increase energy prices, including 

the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home 

heating oil; 
2 

•HCON 86 EH 

Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers 

will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and electricity; 

Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elderly, and those on fixed incomes; 

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses 

moving overseas; 

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth; 

Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a 

carbon tax; 

Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administration, the share of energy consumption during 2023 in the 

United States that was derived from fossil fuels was approximately 80 percent; 

Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good 

manufactured in the United States; 

Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens 

on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic regions and would further restrict the global competitiveness of the United States; 

Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy 

exploration and development and has increased production of domestic energy resources on private and Stateowned land which has created significant job growth and 

private capital investment; 

Whereas the energy policy of the United States should encourage continued private sector innovation and development and not increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers; 
3 

•HCON 86 EH 

Whereas the production of American energy resources increases the ability of the United States to maintain a 

competitive advantage in today’s global economy; 

Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competitiveness and would encourage development abroad in 

countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; 

and 

Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on progrowth solutions that encourage increased development of 

domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon 

3 tax would be detrimental to American families and busi4 nesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 86 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

would be detrimental to the United States economy. 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Section 102(b)(6) of the Fulbright-Hays Act    Word (88K)  |  PDF (87K) ;  and  22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6)

## Regulations

                -  34 CFR 664
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) Parts 75, 77, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1566
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of Tri-M Electrical Contractors, Incorporated, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ADAMS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED; UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenwood. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-799-9-8) Submitted: October 10, 2001 Decided: October 22, 2001 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.William M. Koontz, Steven L. Smith, SMITH & COLLINS, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Daniel J. Weber, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Tri-M Electrical Contractors, Incorporated (“Tri-M”) appeals a district court order granting partial summary judgment to Adams Construction Company Incorporated and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company dismissing Tri-M’s claim under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a et seq. (West 1986 & Supp. 2001), and dismissingthe remaining claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s oral findings and find no error. SeeUnited States f/u/b Interstate Mechanical Construction v. International Fidelity Ins. Co. , 200 F.3d 456 (6th Cir. 2000); United States f/u/b Noland Co. v. Andrews , 406 F.2d 790 (4th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States f/u/b v. Adams Constr. Co. , No. CA-99-799-9-8 (D.S.C. filed Mar. 26, 2001; entered Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED