8764 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices 

8See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

1See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order: 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India, 69 FR 

77995 (December 29, 2004) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 85 

FR 61928 (October 1, 2020). 

3See Sun’s Letter, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 

from the Republic of India: Notice of Intent to 

Participate In 3rd Sunset Review of Countervailing 

Duty Order,’’ dated October 9, 2020. 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Dinggin Hardware (Dalian) Co., Ltd ... 18.16 

Shijiazhuang Asia Casting Co., Ltd ... 18.16 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce will disclose to 

the parties in a proceeding the 

calculations performed in connection 

with a final results of review within five 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of final results in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). However, here, Commerce 

made no adjustments to the margin 

calculation methodology used in the 

Preliminary Results, therefore there are 

no calculations to disclose for the final 

results. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

administrative review. Consistent with 

its recent notice,8 Commerce intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For entries that were not reported in 

the U.S. sales database submitted by 

Wor-Biz during this review, and for the 

companies that did not qualify for a 

separate rate in this review, Commerce 

will instruct CBP to liquidate such 

entries at the China-wide rate (i.e., 

360.30 percent). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by 

sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

companies listed above which have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that for the China-wide entity; and 

(4) for all non-Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 29, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Whether to Average Surrogate 

Values for Financial Ratios 

5. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–02597 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–839] 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From 

India: Final Results of the Expedited 

Third Five-Year Sunset Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) 

from India would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable February 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 29, 2004, Commerce 

published its CVD order on CVP 23 from 

India in the Federal Register.1 On 

October 1, 2020, Commerce published 

the notice of initiation of the third 

sunset review of the Order, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).2 Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

from Sun Chemical Corporation 

(domestic interested party or Sun), 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Sun claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic 

producer of CVP 23 in the United States. 

Commerce received a substantive 

response from the domestic interested 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices 8765 

4See Sun’s Letter, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 

from the Republic of India: Petitioner’s Substantive 

Response,’’ dated October 30, 2020. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on October 1, 2020,’’ dated November 20, 

2020. 

6The bracketed section of the product 

description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business 

proprietary information; the brackets are simply 

part of the chemical nomenclature. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited Third Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

1See Certain Steel Grating from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 75 

FR 43144 (July 23, 2010) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 85 

FR 61928 (October 1, 2020). 

party 4 within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We 

received no substantive response from 

any other domestic or respondent 

interested parties in this proceeding, nor 

was a hearing requested. 

On November 20, 2020, Commerce 

notified the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (ITC) that it did not receive 

an adequate substantive response from 

respondent interested parties.5 As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of this Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

scope of the Order is CVP 23 identified 

as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical 

Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the 

chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3′,2′- 

m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro5,15-diethy-5,15-dihydro-, and 

molecular formula of C34H22Cl2N4O2.6

The subject merchandise includes the 

crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry 

powder, paste, wet cake) and finished 

pigment in the form of presscake and 

dry color. Pigment dispersions in any 

form (e.g., pigments dispersed in 

oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) 

are not included within the scope of the 

order. 

The merchandise subject to this Order 

is classifiable under subheading 

3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise covered by the scope of the 

Order is dispositive. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via the Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 

and electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the CVD order on CVP–23 

from India would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the 

following rates: 

Manufacturers/producers/ 

exporters 

Net 

countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(ad valorem) 

(percent) 

Alpanil Industries Ltd ....................... 14.93 

Pidilite Industries Ltd ....................... 15.24 

AMI Pigments Pvt. Ltd .................... 33.61 

All Others ........................................ 18.66 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing the 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218. 

Dated: January 29, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. History of the Order 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–02598 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–948] 

Steel Grating From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

Expedited Second Five-Year Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this second 

sunset review, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

(CVD) order on steel grating from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of countervailable 

subsidies at the levels indicated in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Applicable February 9, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 23, 2010, Commerce 

published its CVD order on steel grating 

from China in the Federal Register.1 On 

October 1, 2020, Commerce published 

the notice of initiation of the second 

sunset review of the Order, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).2 Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

from Nucor Grating; IKG USA, LLC; 

Ohio Gratings, Inc.; Interstate Gratings, 

LLC; and Lichtgitter USA Inc. 

(collectively, the Metal Grating 

Coalition), within the deadline specified 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES