alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20838 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILSON GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-102-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Wilson Garcia appeals his sentence from his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute heroin, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 841(1)(B)(i). Garcia argues that he is entitled to a two-level adjustment in his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. Although Garcia was only a mule, his role was integral to the entire scheme and was more than peripheral. See United States v. Edwards , 65 F.3d 430, 434 (5th Cir. 1995)(a defendant whose participation is limited to delivering drugs mayNo. 97-20838 -2- not necessarily, despite his more limited role in the conspiracy, be eligible for a reduction of his offense level under § 3B1.2); United States v. Tremelling , 43 F.3d 148, 153 (5th Cir. 1995). Further, Garcia has not carried his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to a role reduction. See United States v. Zuniga , 18 F.3d 1254, 1261 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in finding that Garcia was not entitled to a two-level adjustment as a minor participant. See United States v. Flucas , 99 F.3d 177, 178 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 1097 (1997); Zuniga , 18 F.3d at 1261.
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
AMCORE FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 11
STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        FOR THE YEARS ENDED,
(in 000's)                                                       1996            1995           1994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>            <C>             <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
  EARNINGS
    Income applicable to common stock                           $26,383         $18,271         $21,801

  SHARES
    Weighted average number of common shares                     14,214          14,083          14,023

    Dilutive effect of outstanding options (as
     determined by application of the treasury
     stock method)                                                  214             224             196
                                                                -------         -------         -------
    Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted               14,428          14,307          14,219
                                                                =======         =======         =======

  PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE*                                   $ 1.829         $ 1.277         $ 1.533
                                                                =======         =======         =======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
  EARNINGS
    Income applicable to common stock                           $26,383         $18,271         $21,801

  SHARES
    Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted
     per primary computation above                               14,428          14,307          14,219

    Additional dilutive effect of outstanding options
     (as determined by application of the treasury
     stock method)                                                  182              --              --
                                                                -------         -------         -------
    Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted               14,610          14,307          14,219
                                                                =======         =======         =======
  FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE*                             $ 1.806         $ 1.277         $ 1.533
                                                                =======         =======         =======
</TABLE>

*   This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
    601(b)(11) although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB
    Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
# C_2018373EN.01000101.xml

| 15.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 373/01)

Last publication

OJ C 364, 8.10.2018

Past publications

OJ C 352, 1.10.2018

OJ C 341, 24.9.2018

OJ C 328, 17.9.2018

OJ C 319, 10.9.2018

OJ C 311, 3.9.2018

OJ C 301, 27.8.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### Alfred T. Baxter, Respondent, *v.*Franklin Bell, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

(Argued June 25, 1883;

decided October 2, 1883.)

*Samuel Hand*for appellant.

*Frederic A. Ward*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
SCHEDULE L

Case: 1:12-cv-02473 Document #: 221-12 Filed: 12/16/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4227
SCHEDULE L 

DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO SEC’S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION 

Defendants object that the SEC’s instructions do not sufficiently apprise the jury of 

the relevant securities laws. 

Case: 1:12-cv-02473 Document #: 221-12 Filed: 12/16/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4228
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,456

EX PARTE RODERICK DASHAD NEWTON

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE

NO. W99-36618-I(B)IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT 2

DALLAS COUNTY

Per Curiam. 

O P I N I O N

This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the

provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071. Applicant was convicted of

capital murder in February 2000. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant

to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set

punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant’s conviction and sentence on direct

appeal. Newton v. State, No. AP-73,778 (Tex. Crim. App. June 12, 2002) (not designated

for publication). 
Newton - 2

Applicant presents two allegations in his application in which he challenges the

validity of his conviction and resulting sentence. In his second allegation, applicant claims

that the State withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83

(1963). The State conceded that material exculpatory evidence was withheld from applicant.

The habeas court adopted the State’s unopposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and

recommended that this Court grant relief.

This Court has reviewed the record with respect to applicant’s allegation that the State

withheld exculpatory evidence. Based on the habeas court’s findings and conclusions and

our own review, we hold that the record supports the habeas court’s findings. Therefore,

relief is granted. 

We vacate applicant’s conviction and sentence and remand the case to the trial court

for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Delivered: November 17, 2010

Do Not Publish
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 39 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating to ‘‘Procedures Covering Suspension of 

Liquidation, Duties and Estimated Duties in Accord 

With Presidential Proclamation 10414’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 
2 

•HJ 39 EH 

1 Department of Commerce relating to ‘‘Procedures Cov2 ering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated 

3 Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414’’ 

4 (87 Fed. Reg. 56868), and such rule shall have no force 

5 or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 39 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department 

10414’’. Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated of Commerce relating to ‘‘Procedures Covering
Protecting StudentsSex Discrimination

**Case Resolutions Regarding Sex Discrimination**    Below  are some OCR case  resolutions that  address Title IX civil  rights concerns. This is a partial, illustrative list of case resolutions.  Case resolutions appearing  here do not reflect their importance relative to other case resolutions that do  not appear here. To  see additional resolutions, click “More” below.

 

----

- Tamalpais Union High School District  (CA) (09-18-1466)
Read        the Resolution Letter 
PDF
Read        the Resolution Agreement 
PDF

- Salt Lake Community College (UT) (08-22-2021)
Read        the Resolution Letter 
PDF
Read        the Resolution Agreement 
PDF

- San Juan Bautista School of Medicine (PR) 02-18-2181 & 02-19-2044)
Read        the Resolution Letter 
PDF
Read        the Resolution Agreement 
PDF

- Chino Valley Unified (CA) (09-18-1346)
Read        the Resolution Letter 
PDF
Read  the Resolution Agreement 
PDF

- Connecticut       Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC), Glastonbury Board of Education,       et al. (CT) (01-19-4025, 01-19-1252, et al.)
Read        the CIAC Notice of Referral 
PDF
Read        the Glastonbury Notice of Referral 
PDF
Read        the Revised Letter of Impending Enforcement Action 
PDF

- Chicago       Public Schools District #299 (IL) (05-15-1178 and 05-17-1062) 
Read        the 
Press Release
Read        the Letter of Findings 
PDF
Read        the Resolution Agreement 
PDF

- More Case Resolutions

To access resolution documents created on or after October 1, 2013 click 	**here**or enter criteria in the search box below:           Keyword(s):   Last Modified: 08/29/2022
#### GINN et al., Respondents, v. NICOLETTE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Lowen E. Ginn and Charles A. Murphy against Sylvester Nicolette and Frederick Narrow.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6770

TONY WAYNE COVEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department

of Corrections; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-806-R)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Wayne Covey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Wayne Covey seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Covey’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Covey v. Angelone,

No. CA-97-806-R (W.D. Va. Apr 27, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000714560
<NAME> US AIRWAYS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,211
<SECURITIES>                                       868
<RECEIVABLES>                                      616<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,130
<PP&E>                                           5,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,616<F3>
<BONDS>                                          2,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,574
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,031
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    169
<INCOME-TAX>                                        68
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
<F2>EPS calculations are not relevant because US Airways, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc.
<F3>This amount was restated to conform with current classifications.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 24 (Monday, February 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02626]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 15

[ET Docket No. 20-36; FCC 20-156; FRS 17432]


Unlicensed White Space Device Operations in the Television Bands; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (Commission) is 
correcting a final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on 
January 12, 2021. In this document, the Commission revised its rules to 
expand the ability of unlicensed white space devices to deliver 
wireless broadband services in rural areas and to facilitate the 
development of new and innovative narrowband Internet of Things (IoT) 
devices. This correction clarifies an amendatory instruction.

DATES: Effective February 11, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hugh Van Tuyl, Office of Engineering 
and Technology, 202-418-7506, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#357d40525d1b63545b61404c59755356561b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="327a47555a1c64535c66474b5e725451511c555d44">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This correction clarifies that the 
Commission's modifications to Sec.  15.712(h)(1) were to the 
introductory text of (h)(1) and not (h)(1) as a whole.

Correction

    In FR Doc. 20-26706, appearing on page 2278 in the Federal Register 
on January 12, 2021, the following correction is made:


Sec.  15.712   [Corrected]

0
1. On page 2293, in the second column, instruction number 6 amending 
Sec.  15.712 is corrected to read as follows:
0
6. Amend Sec.  15.712 by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text and paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) and 
(b)(3)(ii) and (iii);
0
b. Adding paragraph (b)(3)(iv);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(ii);
0
d. Adding paragraph (c)(2)(iii); and
0
e. Revising paragraphs (d), (f), and (g); (h)(1) introductory text, and 
(i)(1).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

    Dated: January 27, 2021.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02626 Filed 2-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2017009EN.01000601.xml

| 12.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/6

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2017/C 9/05)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| | EUIPO/AD/01/17 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 6)
  and |
| --- | --- |

EUIPO/AD/01/17 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 6)

and

| | EUIPO/AST/02/17 — ASSISTANTS (AST 3) |
| --- | --- |

EUIPO/AST/02/17 — ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 9 A of 12 January 2017.

Official Journal of the European Union

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Crime, violence, and the crisisin Guatemala : a case study in the erosion of the state**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146:C 86/2
Item Number:0307-A-31 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000689631
 
January 10, 2020
#### 2509.405 Effect of listing.
1 

### Arling, Jeremy

From: Donaldson, David Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:19 AM To: Jones, Danielle Cc: Schillo, Bruce; Arling, Jeremy; Hall-Jordan, Luke; Landolfi, Robert Subject: TSD for the Proposed Revisions to the National Recy cling and Emission Reduction Program Attachments: 608_TSD_08 26 2015_to OMB.docx



### Danielle,
The technical support document for the Proposed Rev isions to the National Recycling and Emission Reduc tion Program is attached.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

David 343-9086
Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

# Panel Review by Applicant

## Texas

Bottom of Form

# _1479587367.unknown
# C_2020214EN.01000701.xml

| 29.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 June 2020

(2020/C 214/07)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1213 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4523 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90575 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4773 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0631 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 155,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,8850 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,808 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 355,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4684 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8426 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,6865 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6313 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5318 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6904 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7428 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5608 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 346,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,3799 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9298 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5575 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 944,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8115 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,053 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,8800 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,674 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0595 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,5836 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,8215 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1213

JPY

Japanese yen

119,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4523

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90575

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4773

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0631

ISK

Iceland króna

155,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,8850

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,808

HUF

Hungarian forint

355,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4684

RON

Romanian leu

4,8426

TRY

Turkish lira

7,6865

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6313

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5318

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6904

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7428

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5608

KRW

South Korean won

1 346,19

ZAR

South African rand

19,3799

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9298

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5575

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 944,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8115

PHP

Philippine peso

56,053

RUB

Russian rouble

77,8800

THB

Thai baht

34,674

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0595

MXN

Mexican peso

25,5836

INR

Indian rupee

84,8215

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Chart 16530HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       16530          Edition:       7          Edition Date:       May 2010          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/24/2010     LNM -       7/13/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
#### DESMOND, Respondent, v. NEW YORK & Q. ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action .by Anna Desmond, as administratrix, etc., of Frederick Peplo, deceased, against the New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.