9294 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 28 / Friday, February 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE ARKANSAS SIP—Continued 

State citation Title/subject 

State 

approval/ 

submittal date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE ARKANSAS SIP 

Control measures Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State 

submittal/ 

effective date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Infrastructure for the 2015 

O3 NAAQS.

Statewide .......................... 9/27/2019 2/12/2021, [Insert Federal 

Register citation].

Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), 

(D)(i) (portion pertaining to PSD), 

(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) 

and (M). 

[FR Doc. 2021–02760 Filed 2–11–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2019–0700; FRL–10018– 

39–Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; VOC 

RACT Requirements for Lithographic 

Printing Facilities 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the Wisconsin Department 

of Natural Resources (WDNR or 

Wisconsin) on December 13, 2019. 

Wisconsin requests that EPA approve 

rules related to control of volatile 

organic compound (VOC) emissions 

from offset lithographic printing 

operations into Wisconsin’s SIP. These 

revisions include amendments to the 

Wisconsin Administrative Code (WAC), 

Chapter NR 422. These revisions are 

approvable because they are consistent 

with the latest Control Techniques 

Guideline (CTG) for Offset Lithographic 

Printing and Letterpress Printing, 

published by EPA in 2006, and such 

revisions clarify and streamline the VOC 

reasonably available control technology 

(RACT) requirements for lithographic 

printing facilities located in nine 

counties in Wisconsin (Kenosha, 

Kewaunee, Manitowoc, Milwaukee, 

Ozaukee, Racine, Sheboygan, 

Washington, and Waukesha). EPA 

proposed to approve this action on 

September 25, 2020 and received no 

comments. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

March 15, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2019–0700. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov website. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either through 

www.regulations.gov or at the 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays and 

facility closures due to COVID–19. We 

recommend that you telephone 

Kathleen Mullen, Environmental 

Engineer, at (312) 353–3490, before 

visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kathleen Mullen, Environmental 

Engineer, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 353–3490, 

Mullen.Kathleen@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

I. Background Information 

On September 25, 2020, EPA 

proposed to approve revisions to 

Wisconsin’s VOC RACT rules for 

lithographic printing facilities contained 

in the Wisconsin Administrative Code 

Chapter NR 422, Sections NR 422.02, 

422.142, and 422.143 (85 FR 60413). An 

explanation of the Clean Air Act 

requirements, a detailed analysis of the 

revisions, and EPA’s reasons for 

proposing approval were provided in 

the notice of proposed rulemaking and 

will not be restated here. The public 

comment period for this proposed rule 

ended on October 26, 2020. EPA 

received no comments on the proposal. 

II. Final Action 

EPA is approving revisions to the 

Wisconsin SIP rules relating to the 

control of VOC emissions from offset 

lithographic printing operations (WI 

Admin Code NR 422.02, 422.142, 

422.143) submitted on December 13, 

2019. These rules are approvable 

because they are consistent with the 

latest CTG for Offset Lithographic 

Printing and Letterpress Printing issued 

by EPA in 2006, clarify the existing state 

VOC RACT requirements for 

lithographic printing operations located 

in nine counties in Wisconsin, and 

streamline the implementation of these 

state rules. 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 28 / Friday, February 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 9295 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation 

by reference of the Wisconsin 

Regulations described in the 

amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 

below. EPA has made, and will continue 

to make, these documents generally 

available through www.regulations.gov, 

and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 

this preamble for more information). 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Clean Air Act and 

applicable Federal regulations. 42 

U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, 

in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this 

action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 

FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 

action because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866; 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by April 13, 2021. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: February 3, 2021. 

Cheryl Newton, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.2570 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(141) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2570 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(141) On December 13, 2019, the 

Wisconsin Department of Natural 

Resources submitted a State 

Implementation Plan revision request 

regarding the state’s volatile organic 

compound (VOC) reasonably available 

control technology (RACT) rules for 

offset lithographic printing operations. 

These revisions include amendments to 

Wisconsin Administrative Code Chapter 

NR 422 that are consistent with the 

latest CTG issued by EPA in 2006 and 

clarify and streamline the VOC RACT 

requirements for lithographic printing 

facilities located in nine counties in 

Wisconsin (Kenosha, Kewaunee, 

Manitowoc, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, 

Racine, Sheboygan, Washington, and 

Waukesha). 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

Wisconsin Administrative Code NR 

422.02 ‘‘Definitions.’’, NR 422.142 

‘‘Lithographic Printing—Part 1.’’, and 

NR 422.143 ‘‘Lithographic Printing— 

Part 2.’’, as published in the Wisconsin 

Administrative Register June 2019, No. 

762, effective July 1, 2019. 

(ii) [Reserved] 

[FR Doc. 2021–02745 Filed 2–11–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 54 

[WC Dkt. No. 17–310; DA 20–1420; FRS 

17373] 

Promoting Telehealth in Rural America 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule and order; 

notification of operational date. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission