alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(October 22, 1963)

#### Cyd Woolf, as Executrix of Stanley Woolf, Deceased, Respondent, v. R. T. Reed, as President of American Express Company, et al., Appellants.

Order, entered on December 4, 1962, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to dismiss the first, second and fourth causes of action granted, with $10 costs, with leave to replead. The complaint is based on injuries sustained aboard a ship owned by defendant Holland-America Line, while the plaintiff’s testator was on a cruise and also for malpractice on the part of the doctor-member of the crew. There is nothing in the complaint to state where the accident occurred. It could have occurred on the high seas or in foreign territorial waters. If it occurred on the high seas, or in foreign territorial waters the Maritime Law must apply. (See *Biley*v. *Agwilines, Inc.,*296 N. Y. 402; *Merrkoeather*v. *Boland & Cornelius,*6 N Y 2d 417; *Sonriesen*v. *Panama Transp. Go.,*298 N. Y. 262; Restatement, Conflict of Law, §§ 404, 406.) Under Maritime Law the place of a tort is of importance in determining the law applicable to it, and the complaint should therefore allege where the accident occurred. If this is unknown to plaintiff, an examination of defendants should be requested. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN B. TURNER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

DUSTIN TIERNEY, in his Individual 

Capacity as Correctional Officer of the 

California Department of Correction and 

Rehabilitation,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-15390

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-06231-MMC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017**

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Stephen B. Turner appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 

motion to modify a settlement agreement and request to vacate the order 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 27 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-15390 

dismissing his underlying 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in light of that settlement 

agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse 

of discretion a denial of motion for relief from a final judgment or order. Casey v. 

Albertson’s Inc., 362 F.3d 1254, 1257 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Turner’s motion to 

modify the settlement agreement and vacate the order of dismissal because Turner 

failed to file these motion within 180 days, as required by the order of dismissal. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1) (motions to vacate an order under Rule 60(b) must be 

brought “within a reasonable time”); see also Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 

624 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 2010) (describing district court’s wide discretion in 

case management and obligation “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive 

determination of every action” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); 

Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc., 452 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir. 2006)

(attorney mistakes are more appropriately addressed through malpractice claims,

not Rule 60(b)(1) motions).

We do not consider allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See 

Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
#### Frank P. Carlson, Inc., v. William L. Carlson et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10(v)

SEALRIGHT CO., INC.
9201 Packaging Drive
DeSoto, Kansas 66018



Mark Dowey

Dear Mark:

          The Board of Directors of Sealright has approved
supplementary benefits for key executives.  The Benefits include
a Retention Payment and Severance Enhancements, but do not
otherwise modify your existing agreements or benefits.

Retention Payment

          If you remain in the continuous employment of Sealright
and perform your present duties through May 29, 1998, you will
receive a one time payment of $60,000.  However, if you are asked
to leave before this date without cause, you will receive this
payment.

Severance Enhancements

          If your employment with Sealright or its successor is
terminated without cause you will receive the benefits under the
Severance Pay Plan or your individual agreement plus the
following:

          1.   Payment of COBRA costs for as long as you desire 
               such insurance coverage up to 12 months.
          2.   Payment for outplacement services for as long as
               the services are needed up to 12 months.
          3.   Payment of your base salary for 12 months
               following the effective date of the termination in
               place of your existing arrangement.

In the event no transaction involving Sealright has been
consummated by December 31, 1998, the Board will review the
Severance Enhancements as well as all other benefits in the
normal course.

          If you have any questions about the foregoing, please
contact Carl Walker or me.


                                   Sincerely,


                                   /s/ Charles F. Marcy
Exhibit 10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 
 Resolutions of the Compensation Committee of Danaher Corporation 
 Re: Philip W. Knisely Stock Options 
 WHEREAS, the following options to purchase shares of
Danaher common stock have previously been granted to Philip W. Knisely under Danaher’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”): 150,000 stock options with a grant date of March 4, 2003; 150,000 stock options with a grant date of
June 27, 2003; 150,000 stock options with a grant date of September 26, 2003; and 78,580 stock options with a grant date of February 23, 2006 (collectively, the “Options”); and 
 WHEREAS, the 1998 Stock Option Plan provides that upon termination of employment (for any reason other than death, Disability,
Retirement or Gross Misconduct (each as defined in the Plan)) any options that are exercisable as of the termination date remain exercisable until the earlier of the 90th day after termination or the expiration of the option term, and the Compensation Committee of Danaher’s Board of
Directors desires to amend the terms of the Options to replace the 90-day post-termination exercise period referred to above with a post-termination exercise period of 180 days. 
 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the terms of the Options are hereby amended to provide that upon Mr. Knisely’s termination of employment (for any reason other than death, Disability,
Retirement or Gross Misconduct (each as defined in the Plan)), with respect to any Options that are exercisable as of such termination date, such Options shall remain exercisable until the earlier of 180 days after termination of employment or the
expiration of the applicable Option term (subject to the Plan provisions relating to compliance with post-employment covenants).
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019130EN.01001601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/16 |

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2019/C 130/06)

![Image 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2019.130.01.0016.01.ENG.xhtml.C_2019130EN.01001602.tif.jpg)

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Andorra

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019130EN.01001601-E0001). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019130EN.01001601-E0002), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country
: Andorra

Subject of commemoration
: Ski World Cup Finals 2019

Description of the design
: The 2019 Ski World Cup Finals will be held in the Principality of Andorra from 11 to 17 March 2019. With this event, the Principality of Andorra will host one of the most important alpine skiing competition in the world.

For the Principality of Andorra, it will be the most prestigious winter sport event that has ever been held in the country, and will be a turning point in the country’s trajectory as a sport destination.

The design of the coin shows in the foreground a skier sliding down a slope. In the background, four curved lines, from the official logo of these Ski World Cup Finals, represent the slopes where the competition will take place. Some snowflakes complete the design together with the inscription ‘FINALS DE LA COPA DEL MÓN D’ESQUÍ ANDORRA 2019’ (Andorra 2019 Ski World Cup Finals).

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
:

60 000

Date of issue
: March 2019

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019130EN.01001601-E0001)  See [OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2001_373_R_TOC) for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019130EN.01001601-E0002)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation ([OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2009_009_R_TOC)).

---
#### Edward R. Nordmark, Respondent, v. James A. Clark, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, defendant Clark appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 21, 1958, which denied his motion for leave to renew and reargue his prior motion to vacate a default judgment of foreclosure and the Referee’s deed thereunder, on the ground that he was never served with process. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion remitted to the Special Term for the purpose of holding a hearing on the question of service of process upon said defendant Clark, and for the purpose of making a determination on the basis of the whole record, including particularly the evidence adduced at such hearing *(Dege*v. *Mascot Realty Corp.,*243 App. Div. 546). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
```

[House Report 111-516]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     111-516

======================================================================

 
   WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
                     RULES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

   June 29, 2010.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1487]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1487, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The resolution applies the 
waiver to any resolution reported from the Rules Committee 
through the legislative day of July 3, 2010, providing for 
consideration or disposition of any of the following: (1) A 
conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4173) to provide 
for financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers and 
investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance 
issues, to regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, 
and for other purposes. (2) A measure that includes a subject 
matter addressed by H.R. 4213 or any amendment pertaining 
thereto.
    The resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions 
that the House suspend the rules at any time through the 
legislative day of July 3, 2010. The Speaker or her designee 
shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the 
designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
resolution. Finally, the resolution provides that it shall be 
in order without intervention of any point of order to consider 
concurrent resolutions providing for adjournment during the 
month of July.

                                  

```
# C_2017386EN.01000901.xml

| 16.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/9

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2017/C 386/07)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

| | EPSO/AD/339/17 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 7) in the following fields:







  1. | FINANCIAL ECONOMICS |
| --- | --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/339/17 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 7) in the following fields:

EPSO/AD/339/17 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 7) in the following fields:

1.

FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

| 2. | MACROECONOMICS |
| --- | --- |

2.

MACROECONOMICS

MACROECONOMICS

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union
  C 386 A of 16 November 2017
  .

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386 A of 16 November 2017

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8034-8035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1014 and 1016 (Third Review)]


Polyvinyl Alcohol From China and Japan; Cancellation of Hearing 
for Third Full Five-Year Reviews

AGENCY:  United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 8035]]


DATES:  January 27, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Alejandro Orozco (202-205-3177), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective September 17, 2020, the Commission 
established a schedule for the conduct of the subject full five-year 
reviews (85 FR 59545, September 22, 2020). Counsel for domestic 
producers filed its request to appear at the hearing on January 26, 
2021. No other party filled a timely request to appear at the hearing. 
On January 27, 2021, counsel for the domestic producers filed a request 
that the Commission cancel the hearing. Counsel indicated a willingness 
to respond to any Commission questions in lieu of an actual hearing 
and, in the alternative, domestic producers would appear at the hearing 
if held. Consequently, the public hearing in connection with these 
reviews, scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. on February 2, 2021, via 
videoconference, is cancelled. The Commission determined that no 
earlier announcement of this cancellation was possible. Parties to 
these reviews should respond to any written questions posed by the 
Commission in their posthearing briefs, which are due to be filed on 
February 10, 2021.
    For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and 
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), 
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 19, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-02221 Filed 2-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# C_2017182EN.01000301.xml

| 9.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 June 2017

(2017/C 182/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1229 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4383 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86755 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7885 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0856 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5233 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,268 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,01 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2065 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5665 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9865 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4894 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5175 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7551 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5575 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5525 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 261,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4476 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6332 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4228 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 932,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7931 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,624 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,0135 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,220 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6852 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4700 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,1365 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1229

JPY

Japanese yen

123,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4383

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86755

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7885

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0856

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5233

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,268

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,01

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2065

RON

Romanian leu

4,5665

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9865

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4894

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5175

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7551

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5575

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5525

KRW

South Korean won

1 261,42

ZAR

South African rand

14,4476

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6332

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4228

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 932,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7931

PHP

Philippine peso

55,624

RUB

Russian rouble

64,0135

THB

Thai baht

38,220

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6852

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4700

INR

Indian rupee

72,1365

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. DANIEL JEREMIAH JAMES , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 21

- 03 31 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2010

- 005976

- 001 The Honorable Randall H. Warner , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Amanda M. Parker Counsel for Respondent
Daniel Jeremiah James , San Luis Petitioner FILED 1-13-2022STATE v. JAMES Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge D. Steven Williams, Judge David B. Gass , and Judge James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court

.

PER CURIUM : ¶1 Petitioner Daniel Jeremiah James seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s latest successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief , a nd the petition for review. The petitioner has failed to show an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, this court grants review but denies relief.
#### 3431.101 Objectives.

The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 31.101.