alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW
|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

**Program Office:**Office of Special Education Programs

**CFDA Number:** 84.380

**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants

----

This program is intended to provide opportunities for individuals with intellectual disabilities to engage in sports training and competitive activities, leading to improvements in the quality of life.

----

Types of projects are: 
                  -  activities to promote the expansion of Special Olympics, including activities to increase the participation of individuals with intellectual disabilities and  
                  -  the design and implementation of Special Olympics education programs, including character education and volunteer programs that support the purposes of the *Special Olympics Sport and Empowerment Act* of 2004, which can be integrated into classroom instruction and are consistent with academic content standards.  

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Mission |  |
|  |
|  | Priorities |  |
|  |
|  | Welcome to ED.gov |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### 32.1109 EFT information submitted by offerors.

If offerors are required to submit EFT information prior to award, the successful offeror is not responsible for resubmitting this information after award of the contract except to make changes, or to place the information on invoices if required by agency procedures. Therefore, contracting officers shall forward EFT information provided by the successful offeror to the appropriate office.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 12

- 00388

- CR

HAROLD WILLIAM KISEL OFF , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 37105CR

ORDER

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, family

violence. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.02(a), (b)(1) (West 2011 ). However, he is not
incarcerated at the present time be cause he was placed on community supervision for
five years. Appellant’s brief in this appeal was originally due on February 22, 2013.
Counsel for appellant has requested and received four previous extensions and has now

filed a fifth motion for extensio n of time to file his brief, requesting another 30 dayKiseloff v. Sta te Page 2

extension. The Rules of A ppellate Procedure anticipate the ability to prepare a brief
within 30 days of the date the record is filed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a).
Accordingly, appellant’s motion for ex tension of time to file his brief is denied.
Appellant’s brief is now past due. We order appellant to file a brief within 14
days from the date of this order. If appellant’s brief is not timely filed, this proceeding
will be abated to the trial court p ursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b).

PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed August 8 , 2013 Do not publish
Exhibit
      31.19





RULE
      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION


OF
      PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING COMPANY


(required
      by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I,
      R.
      Alan Kelley, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September
      30,
      2005 of Ameren Energy Generating Company; and





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date:
      February 12, 2007






/s/
      R.
      Alan
      Kelley


R.
      Alan
      Kelley


President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Key Staff

**Division Director:**Vicki Robinson, Ed.D., 202-453-7907

**Mailing Address:**

U.S. Department of Education, OPEHigher Education Programs, Institutional ServiceMaster's Degree Programs at Predominantly Black Institutions400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Mail Stop: LBJ-HEP-2C206Washington, DC 20202

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Eric Jiminez, Appellant, v. Siegfried Egenhauser, Doing Business as Essee Furniture Co., Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which disallowed the claim upon finding that the injury sustained by claimant, during a tussle with another, *“*did not arise out of the course [sic] of employment.” The board found upon substantial evidence that animosity had existed for some time between claimant, aged 19, employed as a general helper in a furniture and linoleum store, and one Rucker, a linoleum layer found by the board to have been a “ free lance ” workman and not a coemployee, and that they had engaged in a fist fight and in frequent arguments in the past; that an argument arose between them over claimant’s lending to a business neighbor a ladder which claimant had borrowed from another neighbor; and that after angry words and epithets claimant ran to the back of the store to a bayonet (which claimant said he had sharpened and had hidden there sometime before), Rucker running after him with a linoleum knife in his hand, and that in the ensuing *“*tussle ” claimant was injured when cut on the hand by the bayonet, the testimony being that they struggled over the bayonet after Rucker had dropped his knife to the floor. Concededly, the bitter animosity found had existed for many months *721and originated, in part at least, over disputes concerning the work and in some part, as claimant testified, from a “ personal dispute ” and from Rucker’s comments upon claimant’s *“ own*personal life The employer said that claimant *“*hated Rucker ” and had threatened to “ get ” him. Although at least a minor dispute arose between claimant and the employer when the latter chided claimant for lending the ladder, the words exchanged between claimant and Rucker were as to Rucker’s tools; Rucker and the employer testifying that Rucker accused claimant of lending Rucker’s tools just as he had loaned the ladder, and claimant stating, in context not entirely clear, that Rucker had accused him of "taking his tools from time to time”. Upon this record, we may not disturb the factual determination of causation and the particular finding that while the animosity may have originated in the work relationship, the latter injury did not arise out of the employment. Thus, the original causation and the provocations of many months before may be “ deemed to have curdled into private animosity and vengeance having no work-connection, although no independent ground for private animosity * * * intervened and nothing * * * happened but the passage of time.” (1 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 11.13 ; *Matter of Adelstein*v. *Bellride Transp. Corp.,*15 A D 2d 690, motion for leave to appeal denied 11 N Y 2d 643; *Matter of Schneck*v. *Piel’s*Brewery, 11 A D 2d 826; *Matter of Zimmerman*v. *Comet Container Corp.,*4 A D 2d 724.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Javier GONZALEZ-NOGUEZ, also known as Daniel Morales-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50516

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western *442District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Angelina Lugo, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appeilant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Javier Gonzalez-Noguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Michael Heitler and Henry Kimel, plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 30,893.

Prosecution for keeping gaming house. Judgment of conviction. Error to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon, Emanuel Eller, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the Match term, 1926.

Reversed.

Opinion filed October 5, 1926.

Benjamin E. Cohen, for plaintiffs in error; H. J. Rosenberg, of counsel.

Robert E. Crowe, State’s Attorney, Edward E. Wilson and Clarence E. Nelson, Assistant State’s Attorneys, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
239.7402 Policy. ( a ) *Acquisition.* DoD policy is to acquire telecommunications services from common and noncommon telecommunications carriers— ( 1 ) On a competitive basis, except when acquisition using other than full and open competition is justified;
( 2 ) Recognizing the regulations, practices, and decisions of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and other governmental regulatory bodies on rates, cost principles, and accounting practices; and
( 3 ) Making provision in telecommunications services contracts for adoption of— ( i ) FCC approved practices; or
( ii ) The generally accepted practices of the industry on those issues concerning common carrier services where— ( A ) The governmental regulatory body has not expressed itself;
( B ) The governmental regulatory body has declined jurisdiction; or
( C ) There is no governmental regulatory body to decide.
( b ) *Security.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall ensure, in accordance with agency procedures, that purchase requests identify— ( i ) The nature and extent of information requiring security during telecommunications;
( ii ) The requirement for the contractor to secure telecommunications systems;
( iii ) The telecommunications security equipment, devices, techniques, or services with which the contractor's telecommunications security equipment, devices, techniques, or services must be interoperable; and
( iv ) The approved telecommunications security equipment, devices, techniques, or services, such as found in the National Security Agency's Information Systems Security Products and Services Catalogue.
( 2 ) Contractors and subcontractors shall provide all telecommunications security techniques or services required for performance of Government contracts.
( 3 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this section, contractors and subcontractors shall normally provide all required property, to include telecommunications security equipment or related devices, in accordance with FAR 45.102. In some cases, such as for communications security (COMSEC) equipment designated as controlled cryptographic item (CCI), contractors or subcontractors must also meet ownership eligibility conditions.
( 4 ) The head of the agency may authorize provision of the necessary property as Government-furnished property or acquisition as contractor-acquired property, as long as conditions of FAR 45.102(b) are met.
( c ) *Foreign carriers.* For information on contracting with foreign carriers, see PGI 239.7402(c).
[56 FR 36429, July 31, 1991, as amended at 56 FR 67220, Dec. 30, 1991; 62 FR 1060, Jan. 8, 1997; 71 FR 39011, July 11, 2006; 74 FR 37647, July 29, 2009]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Philip Charvat

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05746

Honorable Andrea R. Wood

Travel Services, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, October 28, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Status hearing held;

continued to 12/18/2014 at 9:00 a.m. At the next status hearing, the parties shall be

prepared to report the anticipated timing for Plaintiff's class certification motion and

prospects for settlement. Mailed notice (ac, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 226 Filed: 10/28/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3855
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Jerrold J. Pellizzon, Chief Financial Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: October 24, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ JERROLD J. PELLIZZON
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Jerrold J. Pellizzon   
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020130EN.01000201.xml

| 21.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 April 2020

(2020/C 130/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0860 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4584 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87343 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8623 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0518 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 156,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,2698 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,328 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 354,57 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5272 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8377 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,5220 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7085 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5325 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4168 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7962 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5455 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 323,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,3486 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6819 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5503 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 871,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7507 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,126 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 80,9728 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,284 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,7463 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 26,1086 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,1435 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0860

JPY

Japanese yen

117,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4584

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87343

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8623

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0518

ISK

Iceland króna

156,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,2698

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,328

HUF

Hungarian forint

354,57

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5272

RON

Romanian leu

4,8377

TRY

Turkish lira

7,5220

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7085

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5325

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4168

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7962

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5455

KRW

South Korean won

1 323,52

ZAR

South African rand

20,3486

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6819

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5503

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 871,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7507

PHP

Philippine peso

55,126

RUB

Russian rouble

80,9728

THB

Thai baht

35,284

BRL

Brazilian real

5,7463

MXN

Mexican peso

26,1086

INR

Indian rupee

83,1435

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Lease, dated July 10, 2009



 Exhibit 10.2 
  

																													
	ESS LICENCE AGREEMENT	 		 		 	Agreement Date:	  	10 July 2009 (Revised)
		 		 		  	
	  
 1  
  
	 	Owner	 		 	  
 2  
  
	 	Licensee Address (Registered
Office)
		 	ESS Farnborough Offices LLP	 		 		 	Company Name:	  	FACES DIVISION OF MONOTYPE IMAGING LTD
		 			 	 
		 	Ferneberga House	 		 		 	Reg No:	  	2663485
		 	  
 Alexandra
Road
  
 Farnborough
	 		 		 	 Address:
  
	  	 Reg office: Unit 2 Perrywood Business Park, Salfords, Surrey RH1 5DZ

 Business Address: 349 Yorktown Road, Camberley, Surrey
  

		 			 	 
		 	Hampshire	 		 		 	Contact:	  	Melanie Richardson
		 			 	 
		 	GU14 6DQ	 		 		 	Telephone:	  	01276 38888
		 		  		  		  		  		 		 		 		  		  		 		 		  		 	
	  
 3  
  
	 	Building	 		 		 	Registered Charity (please tick)	 	Yes  	 	 	  	No  	 	x  
		 				
		 	Farnborough, Ferneberga House	 		 		 	Registration Number	 	  

		 			
		 	Ferneberga House	 		 		 	
		 	  
 Farnborough GU14 6DQ Tel: 01252 210555
	 		 	  
 4  
  
	 	Licensee - Invoicing Address (if
different from above)
		 		 		 	Company Name	  	As above
	  
 5  
  
	 	The Premises	 		 		 	Address:	  	 
		 	 Suite 2.3
  
 FACES Own furniture
	 		 		 		  	 Unit 2 Perrywood Business Park, Salfords, Surrey RH1 5DZ
  

		 	 	 		 		 	Telephone;	  	01737 765959	 	 	  	 	 	 
		 		  		  		  		  		 		 		 		  		  		 		 		  		 	
	  
 7  
  
	 	Service Retainer	  	£1000.00	 		 		 	
		 	Licence Fee:	  	£1500.00	 		 	  
 6  
  
	 	Additional Provisions
		 	VAT:	  	 	  	 	  	£225.00	 		 	 	 	  
 Agreed special rate of Phone and IT line to be
 provided at a monthly
cost of £50 per month for both. Numbers to be confirmed. Dilapidations figure to be based on 4 workstation costings as they have their own furniture. Reduced deposit applied as unable to use escrow account.

		 	  
 The Licence Fee & VAT are per calendar month
  
	 		 	 	 
		 		  		  		  		  		 		 	 	 
	  
 8  
  
	 	Commencement Date	  	1 September 2009	 		 	 	 
		 		  		  		  		  		 		 	 	 
	  
 9  
  
	 	Termination Date: 31 August 2010	 		 	 	 
		 	Such date after the expiry of an initial period of months from the commencement date.	  	12   months  	 		 	 	 
		 	  
 (see clause 2 of terms and conditions overleaf)
  
	 		 	 	 
		 		  		  		  		  		 		 		 		  		  		 		 		  		 	
	  
 10  
  
	 	For and on behalf of the Owner	 		 	  
 11  
  
	 	For and on behalf of the
Licensee
		 	Name:	  	Dawn Steel	 		 		 	Name:	  	Timothy Frazer
		 	Title:	  	Business Centre Manager	 		 		 	Title:	  	Director
		 	Signature:	  	/s/ Dawn Steel	 		 		 	Signature:	  	/s/ Timothy Frazer
		 		  		  		  		  		 		 		 		  		  		 		 		  		 	
	  
 12  
  
	 	  
 This agreement is made between the Owner and the Licensee specified above and the licensee confirms he has read and understood the Terms and Conditions overleaf and will be bound by them. The Owner agrees to
provide the services and facilities as detailed over.
  

		 	 
	 	 	  
 New
  
	  	 x
  
	  	 Exp
  
	  	 	 	 Ren
  
	 	 	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 

 ESS Farnborough Offices LLP, Ferneberga House, Alexandra Road, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6DQ

 Telephone: 01252 210555
#### 405.403 Requests from Members of Congress.

The head of the contracting activity (HCA) is the agency head designee pursuant to FAR 5.403.

[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996, as amended at 70 FR 45, Jan. 3, 2005]