alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 200 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Health and Human 

Services relating to ‘‘Control of Communicable Diseases; Foreign Quarantine: Importation of Dogs and Cats’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 6, 2024 

Mr. GOLDEN of Maine (for himself and Ms. TENNEY) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of 

Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘Control of Communicable Diseases; Foreign Quarantine: Importation of 

Dogs and Cats’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘Con5 trol of Communicable Diseases; Foreign Quarantine: Im6 portation of Dogs and Cats’’ published in the Federal RegVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:22 Aug 06, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ200.IH HJ200

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 200 IH 

1 ister on May 13, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 41726 et seq.), and 

2 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### 36.523 Site visit.

The contracting officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at 52.236-27, Site Visit (Construction), in solicitations which include the clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work. *Alternate I* may be used when an organized site visit will be conducted.

[59 FR 67050, Dec. 28, 1994]
Registrant's Specimen Certificate for Ordinary Shares



 Exhibit 4.2 
  

							
	Name of Company:	  		 	7 DAYS GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED
	7 DAYS GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED	 		  	
		  	Number	 		  	Shares
	Number:	  		 		  	- [no. of shares] -
		  	Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands
		
	Shares:	  	 Share capital is US$24,441,673.375 divided into
 195,533,387 Shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.125 each comprising:

	- [no. of shares] -	  	(i) 150,000,000 Ordinary Shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.125 each
		  	(ii) 16,000,000 redeemable and convertible Series A Shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.125 each
		  	(iii) 8,000,000 redeemable and convertible Series B Shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.125 each and
		  	(iv) 21,533,387 redeemable and convertible Series C Shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.125 each
	Issued to:	  	
	[name of shareholder]	  	
		  	THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [name of shareholder] is the registered holder of [no. of shares] Shares in the above-named
		  	Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof.
	Dated	  	
		  	EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the
day            of             2009 by:
		
	Transferred from:	  	
				
		  	DIRECTOR
#### 37.111 Extension of services.

Award of contracts for recurring and continuing service requirements are often delayed due to circumstances beyond the control of contracting offices. Examples of circumstances causing such delays are bid protests and alleged mistakes in bid. In order to avoid negotiation of short extensions to existing contracts, the contracting officer may include an option clause (see 17.208(f)) in solicitations and contracts which will enable the Government to require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. However, these rates may be adjusted only as a result of revisions to prevailing labor rates provided by the Secretary of Labor. The option provision may be exercised more than once, but the total extension of performance thereunder shall not exceed 6 months.

[54 FR 29282, July 11, 1989]
#### In the Matter of William P. Stewart, an Attorney, Respondent. Bar Association of Erie County, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

March 29, 1965.

*572
      *John B. Walsh*for petitioner.

*William P. Stewart,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

On March 5, 1964 there was filed in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York a five-count indictment against respondent William P. Stewart, an attorney. The first four counts alleged that respondent had received a gross income of $11,769.12 in 1957; $18,926.54 in 1958; $12,362.50 in 1959 and $12,900 in 1960 and that he willfully and knowingly failed to file a Federal income tax return for each year respectively in violation of section 7203 of title 26 of the United States Code (Internal Revenue Code). The fifth count alleged violation of subdivision (1) of section 7206 of the Revenue Code.

On December 21, 1964 after a five-day trial before a jury he was found guilty as charged in the first four counts and not guilty of the fifth count. On January 15, 1965 respondent was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,000 on each count, but payment was remitted on counts 2, 3 and 4. The fine was paid.

These facts constitute a violation of canon 29 and canon 32 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, making respondent guilty of professional misconduct. *(Matter of Edelbaum,*10 A D 2d 64.) Respondent’s willful failure to file a tax return in each of four successive years demonstrates an attitude wholly inconsistent with the recognition of proper professional standards, warranting disciplinary action. (Cf. *Matter of Mahon,*15 A D 2d 232; *Matter of Costello,*21 A D 2d 364.)

Respondent should be punished by suspension from the practice of law for a period of six months and thereafter until further order of the court.

Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ., concur.

Respondent is suspended from practice of law for a period of six months and thereafter until further order of the court.
42.402 Visits to contractors' facilities. ( a ) Government personnel planning to visit a contractor's facility in connection with one or more Government contracts shall provide prior notification to the cognizant CAO, with the following information, sufficiently in advance to permit the CAO to make necessary arrangements. Such notification is for the purpose of eliminating duplicative reviews, requests, investigations, and audits relating to the contract administration functions in subpart 42.3 delegated to CAO's and shall, as a minimum, include the following (see also paragraph (b) of this section): ( 1 ) Visitors' names, official positions, and security clearances.
( 2 ) Date and duration of visit.
( 3 ) Name and address of contractor and personnel to be contacted.
( 4 ) Contract number, program involved, and purpose of visit.
( 5 ) If desired, visitors to a contractor's plant may request that a representative of the CAO accompany them. In any event, the CAO has final authority to decide whether a representative shall accompany a visitor.
( b ) If the visit will result in reviewing, auditing, or obtaining any information from the contractor relating to contract administration functions, the prospective visitor shall identify the information in sufficient detail so as to permit the CAO, after consultation with the contractor and the cognizant audit office, to determine whether such information, adequate to fulfill the requirement, has recently been reviewed by or is available within the Government. If so, the CAO will discourage the visit and refer the prospective visitor to the Government office where such information is located. Where the office is the CAO, such information will be immediately forwarded or otherwise made available to the requestor.
( c ) Visitors shall fully inform the CAO of any agreements reached with the contractor or other results of the visit that may affect the CAO.
[48 FR 42370, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 662, Jan. 11, 1988; 53 FR 17859, May 18, 1988]
425.103 Exceptions. ( a ) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) shall make the determination prescribed in FAR 25.103(a).
( b ) Copies of determinations of nonavailability in accordance with FAR 25.103(b)(2) or 25.202(a)(2), for articles, material or supplies not listed in FAR 25.104, may be submitted to the SPE for submission to the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC).
F-1

APPENDIX F

WinHaze Images (Baseline, 2018 and Natural Conditions)
F-2

Caney Creek, AR

2000-04 Baseline

145.1 Mm-1

2018 Projected

94.8 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

32.2 Mm-1
F-3

Cohutta, GA

2000-04 Baseline

216.0 Mm-1

2018 Projected

110.1 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

33.5 Mm-1
F-4

Dolly Sods Wilderness, WV

2000-04 Baseline

194.6 Mm-1

2018 Projected

92.0 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

28.5 Mm-1
F-5

Great Smokey Mountains NP, TN

2000-04 Baseline

216.3 Mm-1

2018 Projected

113.6 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

31.3 Mm-1
F-6

Hercules-Glades, MO

2000-04 Baseline

151.2 Mm-1

2018 Projected

102.5 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

32.1 Mm-1
F-7

James River Face Wilderness, VA

2000-04 Baseline

189.5 Mm-1

2018 Projected

98.2 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

30.9 Mm-1
F-8

Linville Gorge, NC

2000-04 Baseline

183.6 Mm-1

2018 Projected

92.5 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

31.0 Mm-1
F-9

Shenandoah NP, VA

2000-04 Baseline

196.5 Mm-1

2018 Projected

93.3 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

32.2 Mm-1
F-10

Shining Rock Wilderness, NC

2000-04 Baseline

182.2 Mm-1

2018 Projected

97.2 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

34.9 Mm-1
F-11

Sipsey Wilderness, NC

2000-04 Baseline

187.3 Mm-1

2018 Projected

110.5 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

30.3 Mm-1
F-12

Upper Buffalo Wilderness, AR

2000-04 Baseline

142.9 Mm-1

2018 Projected

91.2 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

32.5 Mm-1
F-13

Cape Romain NWR, SC

2000-04 Baseline

147.3 Mm-1

2018 Projected

100.4 Mm-1

2064 Natural Conditions

34.3 Mm-1
## Drone Pacific Contact **Information Update**

Please note our contact phone number has changed. The new contact phone number is: **(702) 902 8255** Mailing Address: **Drone Pacific, LLC 5490 Fawn Chase Way**  **Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 -**  **4006 USA** 
Pl ease update your records accordingly.
4.705-1 Financial and cost accounting records. ( a ) Accounts receivable invoices, adjustments to the accounts, invoice registers, carrier freight bills, shipping orders, and other documents which detail the material or services billed on the related invoices: Retain 4 years.
( b ) Material, work order, or service order files, consisting of purchase requisitions or purchase orders for material or services, or orders for transfer of material or supplies: Retain 4 years.
( c ) Cash advance recapitulations, prepared as posting entries to accounts receivable ledgers for amounts of expense vouchers prepared for employees' travel and related expenses: Retain 4 years.
( d ) Paid, canceled, and voided checks, other than those issued for the payment of salary and wages: Retain 4 years.
( e ) Accounts payable records to support disbursements of funds for materials, equipment, supplies, and services, containing originals or copies of the following and related documents: remittance advices and statements, vendors' invoices, invoice audits and distribution slips, receiving and inspection reports or comparable certifications of receipt and inspection of material or services, and debit and credit memoranda: Retain 4 years.
( f ) Labor cost distribution cards or equivalent documents: Retain 2 years.
( g ) Petty cash records showing description of expenditures, to whom paid, name of person authorizing payment, and date, including copies of vouchers and other supporting documents: Retain 2 years.
32.304-8 Other borrowing. ( a ) Because of the limitations under guaranteed loans, some contractors seek to supplement the loan by other borrowing (outside the guarantee) from the financing institution or other sources. It has been recognized in practice that, while prohibition of borrowings outside the guaranteed loan is preferable when practicable in a given V-loan case, such other borrowings should be permitted when necessary.
( b ) If the agency consents to the contractor obtaining other borrowing during the guaranteed loan period, the agency shall apply the following restrictions: ( 1 ) A reasonable limit on the amount of other borrowing.
( 2 ) If guaranteed and unguaranteed loans are made by the same financing institution, a requirement that any collateral security requested by the institution under the unguaranteed loan is also to be secondary collateral for the guaranteed loan.
( 3 ) A requirement that the contractor provide appropriate documentation to the guaranteeing agency, at intervals not longer than 30 days, to disclose outstanding unguaranteed borrowings.
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 237, Jan. 2, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 57 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2023

      Received; and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the State of Israel.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the State of Israel is not a racist or apartheid state;
            (2) Congress rejects all forms of antisemitism and 
        xenophobia; and
            (3) the United States will always be a staunch partner and 
        supporter of Israel.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 18, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of Norman L. Hess, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

— Respondent was admitted to the Bar by the Fourth Department in November, 1951. He concedes that on July 27, 1978 he was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, upon his plea of guilty, of the misdemeanor of willfully failing to file an income tax return for the calendar year 1974 in violation of section 7203 of the Internal Revenue Code (US Code, tit 26, § 7203). Respondent was sentenced on July 27, 1978 to a prison term of 30 days and fined $10,000. Execution of the sentence and payment of the fine was stayed until August 31, 1978 with respondent to thereafter stand committed until the total fine was paid. A conviction for failure to file an income tax return constitutes professional misconduct *(Matter of Grey,*64 AD2d 997; *Matter of Steidle,*30 AD2d 79). Moreover, respondent’s present misconduct is exacerbated by the fact that he was previously suspended by this court for three months in 1973 following his conviction in Federal court for failure to file an income tax return for the year 1965 *(Matter of Hess,*41 AD2d 1015). Under the circumstances, we conclude that respondent should be suspended for a period of two years. Respondent suspended for a period of two years, the date of the suspension to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
#### Margaret P. McLaughlin, appellee, v. Kate Hahn et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 30,429.

Partition. Decree finding and taxing costs for complainant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo M. Friend, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 25, 1926.

David Ryan Twomey and Reeve & Heywood, for appellants; Harold L. Reeve, of counsel.

Dawson & Dawson, for appellee; George E. Dawson, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 519 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 519

  To authorize testimony and representation in Colorado v. Willenberg.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2018

  Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize testimony and representation in Colorado v. Willenberg.

Whereas, in the case of Colorado v. Willenberg, Case No. 17M1242, pending in 
        Municipal Court in Colorado Springs, Colorado, the defendant has 
        requested the production of testimony from Andrew Merritt, an employee 
        in the office of Senator Cory Gardner;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current or former Members, officers, and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for testimony relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Andrew Merritt, an employee in the Office of Senator 
Cory Gardner, is authorized to testify in the case of Colorado v. 
Willenberg, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 
asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
current and former Members, officers, and employees of the Senate in 
connection with the production of evidence authorized in section one of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Roger H. BallouRoger H. Ballou President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 8, 2009



By:

/s/ Mark A. KerschnerMark A. Kerschner Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: May 8, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Simon Ellguth, appellee, v. John Osinski and Franciszka Osinski, appellants.

Gen. No. 30,468.

Action for rent. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George A. Curran, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 25, 1926.

Harry C. Leemon, for appellants.

William T. Dickerman, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Merchants Bank & Trust Company, Respondent, v Brickote, Inc., et al., Appellants.

— In an action on promissory notes, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 21, 1978, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The affidavit in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment raises a triable issue of fact and it was therefore improper to grant the motion. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

Jason Cottrell, Ph.D.U.S. Department of Education400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5C122Washington, DC 20202Telephone: (202) 453-7530Email: Jason.Cottrell@ED.gov

FIPSE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov