alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

                         CHATTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         ------------------------------

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
              -----------------------------------------------------
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                   FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                          FEBRUARY 28,
                                                   --------------------------
                                                      2002            2001
                                                   ----------      ----------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>
NET INCOME (LOSS):
   Income before extraordinary gain and change
      in accounting principle ................     $    2,372      $      586
   Extraordinary gain ........................             --           7,559
   Change in accounting principle ............         (8,877)             --
                                                   ----------      ----------
      Net income (loss) ......................     $   (6,505)     $    8,145
                                                   ==========      ==========

NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES:
   Weighted average outstanding ..............          8,964           8,867
   Issued upon assumed exercise of outstanding
      stock options ..........................            322              22
   Effect of issuance of restricted common
      shares .................................             32              --
                                                   ----------      ----------
   Weighted average and potential dilutive
      outstanding ............................          9,318           8,889
                                                   ==========      ==========

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
      Basic:
         Income before extraordinary gain and
            change in accounting principle ...     $      .26      $      .07
         Extraordinary gain ..................             --             .85
         Change in accounting principle ......           (.99)             --
                                                   ----------      ----------
            Total basic ......................     $     (.73)     $      .92
                                                   ==========      ==========
      Diluted:
         Income before extraordinary gain and
            change in accounting principle ...     $      .25      $      .07
         Extraordinary gain ..................             --             .85
         Change in accounting principle ......           (.95)             --
                                                   ----------      ----------
            Total diluted ....................     $     (.70)     $      .92
                                                   ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00171

- CV

P. Palivela Raju M.D.

v. Dianne Jackson

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court of Matagorda County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 14

- E

- 0190

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . The Court
orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this deci sion certified below for observance. April 30, 2015
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. James Fallon and Joseph Horen, plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 7,612.

Conviction for violation of Prohibition Act. Error to the County Court of Lake county; the Hon. Perry L. Persons, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1926.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 3, 1926.

Rehearing denied July 5, 1926.

E. V. Orvis, for plaintiffs in error.

Ashbel V. Smith, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; Sidney H. Block and Albert L. Hall, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41464 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE GABRIEL ORTIZ RAMIREZ, also known as Francisco Capdsan, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-291-1

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINGBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Gabriel Ortiz Ramirez pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him for being an alien found unlawfully in the United States following deportation. Ramirez has appealed his sentence. Ramirez's sentence was enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) because he was convicted for an aggravated felony prior to his deportation. Ramirez contends that the prior felony conviction was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Ramirez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but heNo. 00-41464 -2- seeks to preserve the issue for further review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). AFFIRMED.
Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

# Panel Review by Applicant

## Delaware

Bottom of Form

# _1479585161.unknown
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

AF Holdings, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03516

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Comcast Cable Communications, LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, June 14, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Gary Feinerman:Status hearing held. Plaintiff's

motion for order to show cause why Comcast Cable Services should not be found in

contempt of court for failure to comply with subpoena duces tecum [1] is denied as moot

in light of the filing of the amended motion [8]. For the reasons stated in open court,

Plaintiff's amended motion for order to show cause why Comcast Cable Services should

not be in contempt of court for failure to comply with subpoenas duces tecum [8] is

denied. The four subpoenas are quashed. Civil case closed.Mailed notice.(jlj)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-03516 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:184
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHANNON M. STONE,

Appellant,

v.

MARTIN S. STONE,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2700

[May 3, 2018]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Fabienne B. Fahnestock, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 04-024292 (35) (91).

Thomas W. Walters of Thomas W. Walters, P.A., Boca Raton, for 

appellant.

Lisa K. Bennett of Fischler & Friedman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Nora B. Prunk, appellant, v. George W. Prunk, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,575.

Bill for separate maintenance. Decree for complainant, who appeals from amount of award. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bureau county; the Hon. Joe A. Davis, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1925.

Beversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed August 26, 1926.

J. L. Spaulding, for appellant.

Cairo A. Trimble and Perry D. Trimble, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

OSEP Grant Award Letters and Funding Tables

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
Exhibit 23


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

















We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers 333-63037, 333-116801, 333-157143, 333-157144 and 333-162411 on Forms S-8 and S-3 of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation of our report dated March 12, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.








Crowe Horwath Signature





Crowe Horwath LLP


Louisville, Kentucky


March 12, 2010











108
| **E-mail  Address**     | PreschoolDevelopmentGrants@ed.gov                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Mailing Address**     | Preschool Development Grants           Office of Early Learning (OEL)           US. Department of Education           400 Maryland Ave, SW., Rm. 3E336, LBJ Building           Washington DC 20202-6200 |
| **Telephone**           | (202) 453-6700                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| **Toll-Free Telephone** | (800) 872-5327 or (800) USA-LEARN                                                                                                                                                                       |
EXHIBIT 10.4   Schedule of Named Executive Officers Compensation
  Name and Principal Position
    
    2008 Bonus Award
    
    
    2009 Base SalaryDonald E. Smith
    
    $
    160,000
    
    
    $
    602,775President and Chairman of the
Corporation; Chairman of First
Financial Bank, NANorman L. Lowery
    
    $
    150,000
    
    
    $
    485,509Vice Chairman, CEO and Vice
President of the Corporation;
President and CEO of First
Financial Bank, NAMichael A. Carty
    
    $
    20,000
    
    
    $
    194,327CFO, Secretary and Treasurer of the
Corporation; Senior Vice President
and CFO of First Financial Bank, NARichard O. White
    
    $
    12,000
    
    
    $
    163,000Senior Vice President of First
Financial Bank, NAThomas S. Clary
    
    $
    15,000
    
    
    $
    161,976Senior Vice President and CCO of
First Financial Bank, NA
# C_2020177EN.01000201.xml

| 27.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 May 2020

(2020/C 177/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0975 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4558 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88878 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5563 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0600 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 154,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,8943 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,073 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 349,60 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4506 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8440 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,4014 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6539 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5184 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5078 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7717 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5560 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 352,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,0650 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8269 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5840 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 193,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7889 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,358 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,7494 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,988 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,9114 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,3102 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,9270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0975

JPY

Japanese yen

117,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4558

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88878

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5563

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0600

ISK

Iceland króna

154,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,8943

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,073

HUF

Hungarian forint

349,60

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4506

RON

Romanian leu

4,8440

TRY

Turkish lira

7,4014

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6539

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5184

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5078

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7717

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5560

KRW

South Korean won

1 352,23

ZAR

South African rand

19,0650

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8269

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5840

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 193,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7889

PHP

Philippine peso

55,358

RUB

Russian rouble

77,7494

THB

Thai baht

34,988

BRL

Brazilian real

5,9114

MXN

Mexican peso

24,3102

INR

Indian rupee

82,9270

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John F. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Hytek Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hytek Microsystems, Inc.



By: /s/ John F. ColeName:

John F. ColeTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 30, 2004




I, Philip S. Bushnell, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Hytek Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hytek Microsystems, Inc.



By: /s/ Philip S. BushnellName:

Philip S. BushnellTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryDate:

March 30, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Robert A. Berman, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

 
- The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Robert A. Berman 

 

 

Robert A. Berman

 

 

Chairman of the Board and

January 16, 2014

 

Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York v. David Cook.

Motion is granted. Defendant appeals pursuant to section 813-e of the Code of Criminal Procedure from a judgment of conviction upon plea of guilty after the denial of a motion to suppress alleged illegally seized evidence. Section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires, where the defendant is convicted of a crime, that the stenographer, upon notice by the Clerk that an appeal has been taken, file in the office of the Clerk two copies or transcript of the stenographic minutes of *“*the entire proceedings of the trial ”. The section further provides that upon the order of the Trial Judge or upon the order of any appellate court or Judge, the Clerk without charge shall furnish one of said transcripts to the defendant or his counsel. When read together with section 813-e, section 456, reasonably construed, compels the Clerk and the stenographer to cause the minutes of the hearing on the motion to suppress to be transcribed and filed. The Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, is directed to furnish one of said transcripts without charge to the counsel for defendant. Concur-— Breitel, J. P., Yalente, MeNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:53
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:54
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:55
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:56
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:57
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:58
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:59
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:60
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:61
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:62
exv10w8wi









EXHIBIT
10.8(i)




DESCRIPTION OF 2009 SALARIES FOR

THE 2008 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS




(Updated and restated as of October 19, 2009)



Annualized salary rates at October 19, 2009 for the actively employed executive officers of the
Corporation who are named in the executive compensation disclosures of the Corporation’s 2009 proxy
statement in relation to fiscal year 2008 (“2008 Named Executive Officers”) are:




	 	    	 	 	 
	D. Bryan Jordan
	 	$	800,000	 
	Thomas D. Adams, Jr.
	 	$	350,000	 
	Charles G. Burkett
	 	$	728,000	 
	Frank J. Gusmus, Jr.
	 	$	600,000	 
	Charles T. Tuggle, Jr.
	 	$	475,000	 






In addition, the annualized salary rate for William C. (B.J.) Losch III, our principal financial
officer since January 5, 2009, is $400,000.




Salary rates continue in effect until they are changed. This exhibit restates, in one document,
information which previously was disclosed in multiple documents. The rates noted above have not
changed since they were previously disclosed by the Corporation.




On October 19, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in Mr. Burkett’s annualized
salary rate to $739,700, effective the first pay period in January 2010. Mr. Burkett receives an
auto allowance in 2009 which will be cancelled in 2010. The salary increase is 80% of the cancelled
allowance. The other named executives received no auto allowance in 2009 and will receive no salary
increase related to any cancellation of such an allowance.
#### Sistrunk *v.*Love *et al.*

January 16, 1913.

From Fulton superior court. Motion to dismiss.

*J. E. SistrunJc,*for plaintiff. *J. F. GoligMly,*for defendants.

Fish, C. J.

The only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of the motion for new trial. It appears from the record that the merits of the motion for new trial were not considered by the trial judge, but that the motion, at the instance of the respondents thereto, was dismissed upon the ground that no brief of the evidence had been tendered or filed at the time of the hearing, of the motion. The recital in the bill of exceptions that the motion for a new trial was overruled must yield to the record, which affirmatively shows that no such judgment .was rendered. *Southern Railway Co.*v. *Flemister,*120 *Ga.*524 (48 S. E. 160), and cases cited; *Georgia etc. R. Co.*v. *Pritchard,*123 *Ga.*320 (51 S. E. 424); *Evans*v. *Mayor etc. of Forsyth,*126 *Ga.*589 (55 S. E. 490); *James*v. *Cooledge,*129 *Ga.*860 (60 S. E. 182).

As no ruling made or judgment rendered by the trial court is brought under review by the writ of error, the motion made by defendants to dismiss the same must be sustained.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*