alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018376EN.01001101.xml

| 18.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 October 2018

(2018/C 376/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1530 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4604 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87945 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3148 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1453 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4293 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,843 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,55 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2940 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6658 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5818 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6190 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4957 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0373 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7563 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5867 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 299,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4471 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9887 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4165 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 489,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7881 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,181 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,6506 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,542 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3090 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7267 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,8915 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1530

JPY

Japanese yen

129,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4604

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87945

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3148

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1453

ISK

Iceland króna

137,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4293

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,843

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,55

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2940

RON

Romanian leu

4,6658

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5818

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6190

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4957

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0373

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7563

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5867

KRW

South Korean won

1 299,48

ZAR

South African rand

16,4471

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9887

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4165

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 489,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7881

PHP

Philippine peso

62,181

RUB

Russian rouble

75,6506

THB

Thai baht

37,542

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3090

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7267

INR

Indian rupee

84,8915

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2017296EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 September 2017

(2017/C 296/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1931 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91428 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5010 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1399 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2765 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,112 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,17 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2415 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5986 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1045 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4961 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4787 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3362 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6528 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6133 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 353,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,3965 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7850 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4277 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 902,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0570 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,908 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,4889 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,563 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7145 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2936 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,4925 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1931

JPY

Japanese yen

129,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91428

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5010

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1399

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2765

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,112

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,17

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2415

RON

Romanian leu

4,5986

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1045

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4961

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4787

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3362

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6528

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6133

KRW

South Korean won

1 353,94

ZAR

South African rand

15,3965

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7850

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4277

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 902,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0570

PHP

Philippine peso

60,908

RUB

Russian rouble

68,4889

THB

Thai baht

39,563

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7145

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2936

INR

Indian rupee

76,4925

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for CaliforniaReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for CaliforniaReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for CaliforniaReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479578137.unknown

# _1479578138.unknown

# _1479578136.unknown
Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of eClickMD, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neil Burley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the
18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (SS) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

              (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 except as noted in item 3
          below; and

              (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

              (3)  Due to the Company filing a voluntary petition for
          reorganization on May 13, 2003, the Company was delayed in completing
          its audit for Year-End 2002. The Company's subsequent interim
          financial information, for the three-month period ended March 31,
          2003, was also delayed. The information is presently being delivered
          to its independent auditor to perform the required review of these
          interim financial statements in accordance with professional standards
          as required by Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X. In addition, the
          Company's limited staff was required to prepare documentation related
          to the reorganization which further delayed the preparation of the
          Company's interim financial statements and has also had the result of
          delaying the independent auditor's review thereof. Accordingly, the
          accompanying un-audited consolidated financial statements and notes
          thereto were not subject to such independent auditor review
          procedures. The Company will issue an amended Form 10-QSB for the
          three-month period ended March 31, 2003, once the required review
          procedures have been completed.




/s/ Neil Burley
-----------------------

Chief Financial Officer
June 23, 2003

                                       22
Exhibit 23.1






            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements and
related Prospectuses (Forms S-3 No. 333-87512,  No. 333-73421, No. 33-40465, No.
333-36704,  No.  333-107780,  No.  333-105861  and  Form S-4 No.  333-10771)  of
Commerce  Bancorp,  Inc.  and in the  Registration  Statements  (Forms  S-8  No.
33-82742,  No. 33-82740,  No.  333-26965,  No.  333-57497,  No.  333-37764,  No.
333-40386,  No.  333-120715 and No.  333-106941)  pertaining to the Stock Option
Plans and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Commerce Bancorp,  Inc. of our reports
dated March 15, 2005 with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements of
Commerce Bancorp,  Inc., Commerce Bancorp, Inc.  management's  assessment of the
effectiveness   of  internal   control  over   financial   reporting,   and  the
effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting of Commerce Bancorp,
Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2004.


                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 16, 2005
#### SKINNER, Respondent, v. FIELD, et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 17, 1903.)

Action by Henry J. Skinner against Edgar K. Field and another.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY SECTION
906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John J. Dolan, President and Chief Executive Officer of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (First Commonwealth), certify that the Annual Report of First Commonwealth on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.



|                     |  |                                       |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|DATED: March 3, 2011 |  | /s/ John J. Dolan                     |  | 
|                     |  | John J. Dolan                         |  | 
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2019378EN.01000301.xml

| 7.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 378/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 378/3

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2019/C 378/03)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AST-SC/09/19 — CONFERENCE OPERATORS (SC 2)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal of the European Union C 378 A of 7 November 2019.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
#### In the Matter of Arnold Goldstein, Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.

Order entered on August 19,1964 and judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed on the law, with $50 costs, to appellant, the determination of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator annulled and the matter remanded .to the Administrator for reconsideration. The Administrator’s rejection of the purchase price of the second sale as a valuation basis, for the sole reason that it represented a quick turnover, was an arbitrary one *(Matter of Maflo Holding Corp.*v. *Gabel,*22 A D 2d 198). Furthermore, the second sale having been found by the State Rent Administrator to have been both bona fide and normally financed, the City Rent Administrator was bound to accept it as a valuation basis in this proceeding *(Matter of Ess Pee Bee Realty Corp.*v. *Gabel,*22 A D 2d 207). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted for reconsideration by the Administrator. Upon such remand the Administrator must give effect to the income and expenses as of August 27, 1962—-including the then current taxes — the date on which the application was deemed to have been filed. The petitioner, having been granted — in a prior proceeding — an additional 3% rent increase effective September 29, 1962, is entitled thereto until such time as any increase which may be granted herein shall become effective. At such time the petitioner will be entitled to receive either the increase provided for by the State Rent Administrator’s order of September 29, 1961 or by the order to be entered herein, whichever is greater. Obviously, he may not be entitled to both. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<SUBSIDIARY>
<NUMBER> 009
<NAME>  WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                                PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                    674,292
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                      917
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        73,341
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                      16,045
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                                40,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               805,418
<COMMON>                                                     137,214
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                      2,236
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                          123,738
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                               263,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                    2,483
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                         280,426
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                             1,690
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                          0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                     0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                      0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                          0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                        0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                   0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                               257,631
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                                805,418
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                    188,301
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                           5,081
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                   160,683
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                   165,764
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                       22,537
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                             1,750
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                                24,287
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      11,976
<NET-INCOME>                                                  12,311
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                       52
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                                 12,259
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                       8,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                     10,176
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                        15,747
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.00
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017204EN.01000601.xml

| 28.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/6

---

Information to be provided pursuant to Article 5(2)

Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

(Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19) and Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006)

(Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19) and Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006)

(2017/C 204/06)

I.1.   Name and address of the EGTC

Name and address of the EGTC

Registered name: Aquitaine/Euskadi/Navarre Euroregion

Registered name

Registered office:

Registered office

I.2.   Duration of the addition

Duration of the addition

Duration of the grouping: undefined

Duration of the grouping

I.3.   First publication in the OJEU:6.12.2012 — OJ/S S234

First publication in the OJEU:

I.4.   Name and contact details of the new member

Name and contact details of the new member

Navarre

Mikel Irujo: mirujoam@navarra.es

---
# C_2019085EN.01000101.xml

| 7.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

6 March 2019

(2019/C 85/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1305 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4609 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85970 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5375 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1360 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8040 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,592 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,51 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2996 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7463 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,1247 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6072 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5128 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8743 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6679 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5349 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 275,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0583 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5857 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4210 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 999,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6289 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,083 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,4208 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,012 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2682 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7999 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,4320 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1305

JPY

Japanese yen

126,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4609

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85970

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5375

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1360

ISK

Iceland króna

136,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8040

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,592

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,51

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2996

RON

Romanian leu

4,7463

TRY

Turkish lira

6,1247

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6072

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5128

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8743

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6679

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5349

KRW

South Korean won

1 275,05

ZAR

South African rand

16,0583

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5857

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4210

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 999,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6289

PHP

Philippine peso

59,083

RUB

Russian rouble

74,4208

THB

Thai baht

36,012

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2682

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7999

INR

Indian rupee

79,4320

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# Predominantly Black Institutions (PBI) Program

# Competitive Grants 

## FY 2018 Non-Competing Continuation (NCC) Awards
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy Armstrong, Respondent, v. B. Webster Blakey et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Decedent, who was employed as a chauffeur, had for some years been suffering from diabetes and hypertension, conditions known to the employers. He died from a heart attack after helping to push a stalled automobile. Accidental causation is not disputed by the carrier; the appeal is based on a refusal of the Workmen’s Compensation Board to charge the award to the Special Funds Conservation Committee under subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The board ruled that the statutory condition that *“ ‘*death would not have occurred except for such pre-existing permanent physical impairment ’ ” had not been shown in the record. The board’s memorandum states: “ there is insufficient medical evidence that death would not have occurred except for the diabetes condition.” The insufficiency in evidence, as we read the record, is the other way. One physician testified unequivocally to the contribution of the diabetes to the death from the heart attack. Another physician was equivocal; agreed the diseases were associated; negatived diabetes as a *“*cause ” of coronary sclerosis; but added that *“*I think one can certainly say that had this man not been a diabetic he would not have had coronary arteriosclerosis of a fatal degree.” On the record thus presently developed, there seems no substantial evidence to sustain the board’s decision. It may well be the fact that the diabetes played no essential part in the death; but this record as presently developed does not establish it. Decision reversed and claim remitted to the board for such further proceedings as it may be advised, with costs to appellant against Special Funds Conservation Committee. Bergan,,P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor. JJ., concur.