alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020210EN.01002601.xml

| 24.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/26

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

23 June 2020

(2020/C 210/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1318 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4537 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90630 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5175 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0705 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 156,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7345 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,612 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 350,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4371 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8438 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,7622 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6272 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5269 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7716 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7391 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5743 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 366,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,4719 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9944 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5770 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 026,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8390 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,685 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,7474 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,995 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,9006 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,2497 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,4380 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1318

JPY

Japanese yen

121,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4537

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90630

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5175

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0705

ISK

Iceland króna

156,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7345

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,612

HUF

Hungarian forint

350,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4371

RON

Romanian leu

4,8438

TRY

Turkish lira

7,7622

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6272

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5269

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7716

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7391

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5743

KRW

South Korean won

1 366,51

ZAR

South African rand

19,4719

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9944

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5770

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 026,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8390

PHP

Philippine peso

56,685

RUB

Russian rouble

77,7474

THB

Thai baht

34,995

BRL

Brazilian real

5,9006

MXN

Mexican peso

25,2497

INR

Indian rupee

85,4380

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2017218EN.01002401.xml

| 7.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/24

---

Corrigendum to the information about the session of the European Economic and Social Committee that adopted the documents published in the
  Official Journal C 209 of 30 June 2017

Official Journal C 209 of 30 June 2017

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 209 of 30 June 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 209 of 30 June 2017

(2017/C 218/14)

On the first page of the cover, under the heading ‘I Resolutions, recommendations and opinions’:

I Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

for:

for:

‘523th EESC plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2017’,

read:

read:

‘524th EESC plenary session of 29 and 30 March 2017’.

On the first page of the cover, under the heading ‘III Preparatory acts’:

III Preparatory acts

for:

for:

‘523th EESC plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2017’,

read:

read:

‘524th EESC plenary session of 29 and 30 March 2017’.

On page 1:

for:

for:

‘523TH EESC PLENARY SESSION OF 22 AND 23 FEBRUARY 2017’,

read:

read:

‘524TH EESC PLENARY SESSION OF 29 AND 30 MARCH 2017’.

On page 15:

for:

for:

‘523TH EESC PLENARY SESSION OF 22 AND 23 FEBRUARY 2017’,

read:

read:

‘524TH EESC PLENARY SESSION OF 29 AND 30 MARCH 2017’.

---
# C_2019271EN.01006701.xml

| 13.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/67

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 August 2019

(2019/C 271/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1194 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4633 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92615 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7315 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0876 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0003 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,831 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3275 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7250 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,2161 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6589 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4807 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7825 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7352 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5520 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 364,55 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2164 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9014 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3908 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 951,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7022 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,424 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,4092 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,506 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4660 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,9971 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,7460 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1194

JPY

Japanese yen

117,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4633

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92615

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7315

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0876

ISK

Iceland króna

137,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0003

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,831

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3275

RON

Romanian leu

4,7250

TRY

Turkish lira

6,2161

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6589

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4807

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7825

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7352

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5520

KRW

South Korean won

1 364,55

ZAR

South African rand

17,2164

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9014

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3908

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 951,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7022

PHP

Philippine peso

58,424

RUB

Russian rouble

73,4092

THB

Thai baht

34,506

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4660

MXN

Mexican peso

21,9971

INR

Indian rupee

79,7460

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 4.2203 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-27, Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application, in all solicitations and contracts, unless an exception is granted in accordance with OMB Memorandum M-23-13.
#### 3452.247-70 Foreign travel.

As prescribed in 3447.701, insert the following clause in all solicitations and resultant cost-reimbursement contracts:

# Foreign Travel (MAR 2011)

Foreign travel shall not be undertaken without the prior written approval of the contracting officer. As used in this clause, *foreign travel* means travel outside the Continental United States, as defined in the Federal Travel Regulation. Travel to non-foreign areas (including the States of Alaska and Hawaii, the Commonwealths of Puerto Rico, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands and the territories and possessions of the United States) is considered “foreign travel” for the purposes of this clause.

(End of clause)
36.204 Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects. Advance notices and solicitations shall state the magnitude of the requirement in terms of physical characteristics and estimated price range. In no event shall the statement of magnitude disclose the Government's estimate. Therefore, the estimated price should be described in terms of one of the following price ranges: ( a ) Less than $25,000.
( b ) Between $25,000 and $100,000.
( c ) Between $100,000 and $250,000.
( d ) Between $250,000 and $500,000.
( e ) Between $500,000 and $1,000,000.
( f ) Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.
( g ) Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000.
( h ) More than $10,000,000.
#### 428.101-1 Policy on use.

The Senior Procurement Executive may authorize class waivers of the requirement to obtain bid guarantees.
#### 422.1308 Complaint procedures.

The contracting officer shall forward complaints received about the administration of the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act directly to the Department of Labor as prescribed in FAR 22.1308.
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 111 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to 

‘‘Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Furnaces’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2024 

Mrs. FISCHBACH (for herself, Mr. FALLON, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. 

ELLZEY, Mr. SELF, Mr. POSEY, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. OGLES, Ms. 

STEFANIK, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, Mr. CLYDE, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, 

Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. ROSENDALE, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 

KUSTOFF, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Mr. ROUZER, Ms. HAGEMAN, Mr. WEBER

of Texas, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mr. VAN DREW, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. 

NEWHOUSE, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. BOST, Mr. ROSE, Mr. PALMER, Mr. 

STAUBER, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. 

FINSTAD, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. ESTES, and Ms. BOEBERT) 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to ‘‘Energy Conservation Program: Energy 

Conservation Standards for Consumer Furnaces’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Energy relating to ‘‘Energy Conservation 

5 Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 111 IH 

1 Furnaces’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 87502), and such rule shall have 

2 no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
First Amendment to Supplemental Terms and Conditions Letter



 Exhibit 10.68 
 

 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS LETTER 
 This First Amendment to
Supplemental Terms and Conditions Letter is entered into as of October 16, 2009, by and between Looksmart, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”) and City National Bank, a national banking association
(“CNB”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. Borrower and CNB are parties to that certain Supplemental Terms and Conditions Letter dated as of August 14, 2009, (the Supplemental Terms and Conditions Letter, as herein amended, hereinafter the
“Agreement”). 
 B. Borrower and CNB desire to supplement and amend the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.

 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 

  

	2.	Amendments. The Agreement is amended as follows: 

  

	 	2.1	Section 1.1 is amended in its entirety to provide as follows: 

  

	 	“1.1	Copies of weekly account statements as of each Friday, from all brokerage firms and financial institutions in which Borrower maintains accounts containing its Liquid
Assets, certified by Looksmart to be in compliance with the terms of Section 3.2 of this Agreement and delivered no later than the following Tuesday.” 

  

	 	2.2	Sections 3.1 and 3.2 are amended in their entirety to provide as follows: 

  


	 	“3.1	Tangible Net Worth of not less than $22,000,000.00 as of September 30, 2009 and at all times thereafter; 

  

	 	3.2	Liquid Assets of not less than $22,000,000.00 as of September 30, 2009 and at all times thereafter;” 

 3. Existing Agreement. Except as expressly amended herein, the Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and in all other respects is
affirmed. 
  

 1 








 4. Conditions Precedent. This Amendment shall become effective upon the fulfillment of all of the
following conditions to CNB’s satisfaction: 
  

	 	4.1	CNB shall have received this Amendment duly executed by Borrower; and 

  

	 	4.2	CNB shall have received an Amendment Fee of $1,500.00. 

 5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and all such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. 
 6. Governing Law. This Amendment and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by the laws
of the State of California. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first
above written. 
 “Borrower” 
 Looksmart, Ltd., a 
 Delaware corporation 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Edward F. West

		 	Edward F. West, President/CEO
	By:	 	 /s/ S. C. Markowski

		 	Stephen C. Markowski, CFO

 “CNB” 
 City National Bank, a national 
 banking association 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Sanford Topham

		 	Sanford Topham, Vice President

  

 2
Exhibit 32.1



Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Joel P. Moskowitz, Chief Executive Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: July 29, 2005



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    JOEL P.
MOSKOWITZ                 
|Joel P. Moskowitz Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<SUBSIDIARY>
<NUMBER> 004
<NAME>  PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                1,302,479
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                 20,185
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     103,574
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                     2,354
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                              33,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,462,146
<COMMON>                                                   157,230
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                  180,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                        142,107
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                             479,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                  5,287
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                       402,582
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                           3,740
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   40,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                               55,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                             476,200
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                            1,462,146
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                  343,277
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                        12,282
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 288,121
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 300,403
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                     42,874
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                             382
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                              43,256
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    20,039
<NET-INCOME>                                                23,217
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    106
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                               23,111
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    18,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                   14,022
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                      54,104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.00
        



</TABLE>
#### (A) Castle Inn Restaurant, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Stassa Prevelegianos et al., Appellants. (B) Harry Gutman, Individually and Doing Business as Target Super Service Co., Respondent, v. John Fero, Individually and/or Doing Business as Superior Distributors, Appellant.

[In each action] Motion by appellant for a stay, pending appeal, denied. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 220 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection relating to ‘‘Debt Collection Practices (Regulation F); Deceptive and Unfair Collection of Medical Debt’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2024 

Mr. PALMER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 

to ‘‘Debt Collection Practices (Regulation F); Deceptive 

and Unfair Collection of Medical Debt’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ‘‘Debt 

5 Collection Practices (Regulation F); Deceptive and Unfair 

6 Collection of Medical Debt’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 80715; pubVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:32 Nov 13, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ220.IH HJ220

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 220 IH 

1 lished October 4, 2024), and such rule shall have no force 

2 or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MICHELE F. O'BRYAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 12 C 5305

)

POSTRACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., )

DONALD HEIDRICH, MARK AUBRY, )

WILLIAM WASHBURN and STEVEN )

GONZALO, )

)

Defendants. )

______________________________________ )

)

POSTRACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., )

)

Counter-Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHELE F. O'BRYAN and DOUGLAS )

SPITZ, )

)

 Counter and )

Third-Party Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

PosTrack Technologies, Inc. ("PosTrack"), one of the defendants in this action brought by

Michele O'Bryan ("O'Bryan"), has coupled its Second Amended Answer to O'Bryan's Complaint

with counterclaims against O'Bryan and Douglas Spitz ("Spitz," who is not otherwise a party to

this litigation). Spitz has responded with a self-prepared Answer that does not deal in specific

terms with PosTrack's allegations. Instead he flatly "den[ies] all allegations (General Denial)

inclusive of jurisdiction." What he does state in detail is a total absence of contacts on his part

Case: 1:12-cv-05305 Document #: 50 Filed: 01/08/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:299
with Illinois, except for "traveling twice to the PosTrack office in Illinois as an employee." 

This Court will treat Spitz' filing as a motion for his dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(b)(2). PosTrack is ordered to file a submission on or before January 17, 2013 that supports

haling Virginia resident Spitz into this jurisdiction to address its claims against him. If it does

not do so in timely fashion, Spitz will be dismissed as a third-party defendant, but if it does

provide a response this Court will determine what further proceedings are appropriate as to Spitz.

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: January 8, 2013

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-05305 Document #: 50 Filed: 01/08/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:300
#### 3452.242-71 Notice to the Government of delays.

As prescribed in 3442.7002, insert the following clause in all solicitations and contracts other than purchase orders:

# Notice to the Government of Delays (MAR 2011)

The contractor shall notify the contracting officer of any actual or potential situation, including but not limited to labor disputes, that delays or threatens to delay the timely performance of work under this contract. The contractor shall immediately give written notice thereof, including all relevant information.

(End of clause)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Curran, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, imposed July 17, 1978. Sentence affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
#### Western Foundation Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Five Boro Construction Corp. et al., Defendants. Five Boro Construction Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. City of New York, Third-Party Defendant. Five Boro Construction Corp., Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Defendants. City of New York, Appellant, v. Continental Casualty Company et al., Respondents. City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. J. Rich Steers, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Order entered on December 17, 1959, granting the motion of plaintiff-respondent and the defendants-respondents for summary judgment, pursuant to rules 113 and 114 of -the Rules of Civil Practice, dismissing the first and third counterclaims contained in the answer, and severing the action, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.