alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019131EN.01000301.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/3

---

Taking of the oath by a new Member of the Court

(2019/C 131/03)

Following his appointment as Judge at the Court of Justice for the period from 12 March 2019 to 6 October 2024 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 6 March 2019 (1), Mr Kumin took the oath before the Court of Justice on 20 March 2019.

---

(1)  OJ L 70, 12.3.2019, p. 32.

---
# C_2019210EN.01001201.xml

| 21.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 June 2019

(2019/C 210/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1307 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,71 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4661 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6348 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1142 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6678 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,619 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,58 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2556 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7262 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5291 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6323 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4886 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8379 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7158 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5336 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 312,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1309 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7502 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4035 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 036,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6901 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,159 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,4393 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,978 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3407 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3960 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,5065 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1307

JPY

Japanese yen

121,71

DKK

Danish krone

7,4661

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89155

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6348

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1142

ISK

Iceland króna

141,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6678

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,619

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,58

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2556

RON

Romanian leu

4,7262

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5291

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6323

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4886

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8379

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7158

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5336

KRW

South Korean won

1 312,25

ZAR

South African rand

16,1309

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7502

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4035

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 036,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6901

PHP

Philippine peso

58,159

RUB

Russian rouble

71,4393

THB

Thai baht

34,978

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3407

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3960

INR

Indian rupee

78,5065

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### In the Matter of County of Broome, Respondent, v Robert M. Eronimous et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered March 28, 1978 in Broome County, which denied a motion to dismiss petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, as being untimely. On August 10, 1977 the City of Binghamton’s Board of Assessment and Review denied petitioner’s request for tax exemption for its Veteran’s Memorial Arena. Thereafter, on August 23, 1977, the instant proceeding was initiated and made returnable on September 13, 1977 to review the assessment. The assessment roll, however, was not completed and filed until September 1, 1977. Prior to the return day the matter was ordered placed on the Pretrial Calendar. On November 21, 1977 appellants moved to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that there was a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Petitioner cross-moved to dismiss appellants’ motion. Special Term denied appellants’ motion and granted petitioner’s cross motion. This appeal ensued. A proceeding to review an assessment of real property shall be commenced within 30 days after the final completion and filing of the *989assessment roll containing such assessment (Real Property Tax Law, § 702, subd 2). Based on this statute appellants maintain that the proceeding was commenced prematurely and thus jurisdictionally defective requiring dismissal of the petition. We disagree. While there appears to be some authority supportive of this contention *(Matter of City of New York v Christensen,*30 AD2d 700, aifd 24 NY2d 1002), we are of the view that the better and more salutary rule is articulated in *Reifke v State of New York*(31 AD2d 67, 68, aifd 26 NY2d 859). The court therein was concerned with subdivision 15 of section 30 of the Highway Law which required, at that time, that certain claims be filed within six months after a specific event. It was the opinion of that court that the word "within” fixed the limit beyond which action could not be taken, but did not fix the first point of time at which action had to be taken *(Reifke v State of New York, supra,*pp 69, 70). In other words, a time period was fixed precluding filing of a claim after a certain date but not prohibiting the filing prior to a specific date. Adopting the reasoning expressed in *Reifke,*we are of the opinion that the petitioner’s commencement of the instant proceeding a short time prior to the completion and filing of the assessment roll did not render the proceeding jurisdictionally defective. Furthermore, it is significant to us that no prejudice resulted to appellants due to the commencement of this proceeding some nine days prior to the completion and filing of the assessment rolls. The order, therefore, should be affirmed. In view of this determination, it is unnecessary to consider the remaining issue raised by petitioner. Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.b
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jay G. Stuart, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CDI Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 5, 2004       By: /s/ Jay G. Stuart       Jay G. Stuart   Executive Vice President and Chief
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice:11350]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Projects: Gabrielle L'Hirondelle Hill” at the Museum of Modern Art's Sue and Edgar Wachenheim III Gallery, in New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/                              ( print page 8676)                            PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Matthew R. Lussenhop,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-02470 Filed 2-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**Exhibit 32.2****CENTEX CORPORATION****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Catherine R. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ CATHERINE R. SMITH    Catherine R. Smith    Chief Financial Officer         Date: February 1, 2007
#### The People *of*the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Ludwig, Also Known as Harry Lewis Ludwig, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 1, 1964, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered November 20, 1936 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and imposing sentence; and (2) from an order of said court, made April 8, 1964 upon reargument, which adhered to the original decision. Appeal from order of April 1, 1964 dismissed. That order was superseded by the later order of April 8, 1964, granting reargument. Order of April 8, 1964 affirmed *(People*v. *Bratcher,*16 A D 2d 942). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 37.604 Quality assurance surveillance plans.

Requirements for quality assurance and quality assurance surveillance plans are in Subpart 46.4. The Government may either prepare the quality assurance surveillance plan or require the offerors to submit a proposed quality assurance surveillance plan for the Government's consideration in development of the Government's plan.
#### W. C. Burwell, appellee, v. C. Ascher, trading as Ascher’s Motor Exchange, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,937.

Action for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the City Court of Chicago Heights; the Hon. Lee W. Carrier, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1926.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed October 5, 1926.

Meier & Poorman, for appellant.

Abbott, Hood & Smith, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                             |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                             | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of English Language Acquisition Home |
|                                             |

**Who May Apply** (by category): Institutions of higher education (IHEs) or public or private entities.

**Who May Apply**(specifically): Institutions of higher education (IHEs) or public or private entities with relevant experience and capacity, in consortia with State educational agencies (SEAs) or local educational agencies (LEAs). 

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
Exhibit 10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 
 CAPITOL ACQUISITION CORP. 
 October 28, 2009

 Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. 
 520 Madison Avenue 
 9th Floor 
 New York, NY 10022 
 Dear Sirs: 
 Reference is made to that certain Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”), dated November 8, 2007, between Capitol Acquisition Corp. (“Company”) and
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the underwriters, including Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”), in the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”) and the letter agreement
(the “Letter Agreement”) entered into between the Company and Ladenburg on June 10, 2009. Capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Underwriting Agreement.

 The Company and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (“Two Harbors”) have entered into a business combination transaction
(the “Transaction”). In connection with the Transaction, Ladenburg (acting for itself and not on behalf of the other Underwriters) hereby agrees to waive the Deferred Discount it is entitled to pursuant to Sections 2(c) and (dd) of
the Underwriting Agreement, and in lieu thereof, receive a fee equal to $1,500,000 payable upon the consummation of the Transaction. 
 Additionally, if, following the consummation of the Transaction, the Company or Two Harbors, considers one or more transactions to raise debt or equity (other than exercise of the Company’s existing outstanding warrants, as amended in
connection with consummation of the Transaction), Two Harbors agrees to cause Ladenburg to be offered a role as lead or co-manager (the choice of such role to be within Two Harbor’s sole discretion) in connection with the first two such
transactions occurring within one year after consummation of the Transaction; with the reasonable economics associated with such role to be negotiated by the parties at the time of engagement. 
 This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements among the parties with respect to its subject matter, including the Underwriting Agreement
and the Letter Agreement. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,
  
 CAPITOL ACQUISITION CORP.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Jeff Stolt
		 	 Name: Jeff Stolt
 Title: Vice President and Treasurer



  

			
	 Accepted and Agreed:
  
 TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Jeff Stolt
		 	 Name: Jeff Stolt
 Title:
  Chief Financial Officer

	
	LADENBURG THALMANN & CO. INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Steve Kaplan
		 	 Name: Steve Kaplan
 Title:
  Managing Director
3430.201-5 Waiver. ( a ) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the head of the agency for the purposes of FAR 30.201-5(a) and (b).
');
	document.write('

**Program Office:**
 Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs

**CFDA:** 84.383A

**Program Type:** Formula grant

The Homeless Education Disaster Assistance program is a new, one-year program under which the U.S. Department of Education (ED) provides financial assistance to local educational agencies (LEAs) whose enrollment of homeless students has increased as a result of a natural disaster  that occurred in calendar year 2008 (2008).  The program supports activities that address the educational and related needs of homeless students consistent with the requirements of section 723(d) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (McKinney-Vento Act).
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, Title VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Secs 701-705
                - 20 U.S.C. 1134-1134d

## Regulations

                - Title 34, Part 650.
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75 (except as provided in 34 CFR 650.3(b)), 77, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98 and 99

Student Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov