alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 45.604-2 Use of GSA sponsored sales centers.

Agencies may use sales center services. Use of such centers for sale of surplus property is authorized when in the best interest of the Government, consistent with contract terms and conditions.

[77 FR 12944, Mar. 2, 2012]
Exhibit 10(iii)31

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                    CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION
                             SAVINGS INCENTIVE PLAN

      WHEREAS, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the "Sponsor") adopted
the Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation Savings Incentive Plan (the
"Plan"), most recently restated effective January 1, 2004; and

      WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Sponsor amends the Plan as follows:

      1. Effective for each payroll period beginning on or after February 15,
2004, Section 6.6 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing subsection (c)
thereof with the following paragraphs:

      (c)   Griffith Employees. The amount of any such Regular Matching
            Contribution made to Griffith Employees shall be equal to 100% of
            the Tax-Deferred Contributions made for the Contribution Period on
            behalf of such Eligible Employee up to, but not exceeding, the
            "match level". For purposes of this paragraph, the "match level"
            means 4% of the Eligible Employee's Compensation for the
            Contribution Period, excluding any Compensation earned by the
            Eligible Employee during the Contribution Period, but prior to the
            date on which he first became an Eligible Employee.

      (d)   SCASCO Employees. The amount of any such Regular Matching
            Contribution made to SCASCO Employees shall be equal to 50% of the
            Tax-Deferred Contributions made for the Contribution Period on
            behalf of such Eligible Employee up to, but not exceeding, the
            "match level". For purposes of this paragraph, the "match level"
            means 8% of the Eligible Employee's Compensation for the
            Contribution Period, excluding any Compensation earned by the
            Eligible Employee during the Contribution Period, but prior to the
            date on which he first became an Eligible Employee.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has executed this instrument this 6th day
of February, 2004.

                                        CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC
                                        CORPORATION


                                        By: /s/_________________________
                                        Name:  Paul J. Ganci
                                        Title: Chairman of the Board
3030.201-5 Waiver. ( a ) The CPO is authorized to waive the applicability of the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) under (FAR) 48 CFR 30.201-5(b). This authority may not be redelegated.
( c ) Waiver requests must conform to (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.70.
[71 FR 25771, May 2, 2006]
#### 300 Broadway Realty Corporation, Respondent, v. Lester Kommit, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Special Term in Albany County denying separate motions to dismiss the amended complaint for legal insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4; CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 7) and to strike two paragraphs thereof as irrelevant, redundant and tending to prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 103; CPLR 3024, subd. [b].) The complaint alleges that defendant while an officer and director of plaintiff corporation fraudulently and in breach of his fiduciary duties “permitted and caused” it to enter into a contract with North American Contracting Co., Inc., for the construction of a hotel on premises which it owned in the City of Albany. A copy of the written contract is annexed to and made a part of the pleading. On its face it appears *837not to have been executed by plaintiff and thus refutes the charge of wrongdoing by defendant which is sought to be redressed. The well-settled rule that a written agreement annexed to and made a part of a complaint must prevail over its pleaded version where there is a variance *(Dorn*v. *Dorn,*282 App. Div. 597) applies with equal force to a writing where, as here, its wrongfully induced execution is the gravamen of the pleading. In its present posture the amended complaint fails to state a cause of action. This result renders academic the appeal from the second decretal paragraph of Special Term’s order. Otherwise, affirmance would be indicated. Order denying the motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action reversed, on the law and the facts, and motion granted with leave to plaintiff to replead within 20 days, if so advised; with $10 costs. Appeal from so much of the order as denied the motion to strike paragraphs numbered Twenty-first and Twenty-second of the amended complaint dismissed as moot. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
#### 4.2003 Notification.

When a contractor provides notification pursuant to 52.204-23, follow agency procedures.
e 

USDeparimeffl 

otTronsponaTton 

PMtaralAt/iation 

Administration 

•;"PARTMENT OF 

^^NSPORWION ^ 

./..El OPERATIONS 

;[ J^N28 P 3;U8 800 independence Ave,. S W. 

Washington, D.C. 2059i 

JAN 2 6 2011 

Mr. Michael E. Walker 

Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. 

P.O. Box 488 

Denver, NC 28037 

Dear Mr. Walker: 

We have received your December 8,2010, correspondence withdrawing your 

November 8,2010, petition onbehalf of Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. for an exemption from 

§ 121.1109 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 

We have closed docket No. FAA-2010^1133 and no further action will be taken on your 

petition. 

Sincerely, 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

30 3Dtfd 9Ni>iyw3"iny J O BOIJJ O SZ.0Si9S20S 9E:9 I TI02/83/T0
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 1, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and Servicing Operations (“CONFERS”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ClearSpace SA, Lausanne, SWITZERLAND; COMSPOC Corporation, Exton, PA; Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL; L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Melbourne, FL; Motiv Space Systems, Pasadena, CA; and Zero-G Horizons Technologies, LLC, Daytona Beach, FL have been added as parties to this venture.                

Effective Space, London, UNITED KINGDOM has withdrawn as a party to this venture.

                    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research                           ( print page 9373)                        project remains open, and CONFERS intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.                

                    On September 10, 2018, CONFERS filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 19, 2018 (83 FR 53106).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 18, 2020. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 30, 2020 (85 FR 76603).                

Suzanne Morris

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2021-02940 Filed 2-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# C_2021066EN.01004901.xml

| 26.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/49

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 February 2021

(2021/C 66/13)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2225 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,73 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4363 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86408 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0668 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1076 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 153,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,2275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,110 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 360,18 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5122 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8748 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,8344 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5317 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5257 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4793 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6409 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6120 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 359,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,1101 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8898 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5895 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 352,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9383 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,492 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,3519 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,858 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,6663 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,3424 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,7940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2225

JPY

Japanese yen

129,73

DKK

Danish krone

7,4363

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86408

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0668

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1076

ISK

Iceland króna

153,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,2275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,110

HUF

Hungarian forint

360,18

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5122

RON

Romanian leu

4,8748

TRY

Turkish lira

8,8344

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5317

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5257

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4793

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6409

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6120

KRW

South Korean won

1 359,14

ZAR

South African rand

18,1101

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8898

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5895

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 352,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9383

PHP

Philippine peso

59,492

RUB

Russian rouble

90,3519

THB

Thai baht

36,858

BRL

Brazilian real

6,6663

MXN

Mexican peso

25,3424

INR

Indian rupee

88,7940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# CA2018179EN.01000101.xml

| 25.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 179/1

---

Corrigendum to Recruitment notice PE/197/S

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 144 A of 25 April 2018
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 144 A of 25 April 2018

(2018/C 179 A/01)

On page 1:

On page 1:

for:

for:

‘The European Parliament has decided to organise a selection procedure based on qualifications and tests for the purpose of establishing a reserve list to fill eleven posts of:’,

read:

read:

‘The European Parliament has decided to organise a selection procedure on the basis of qualifications and tests for the purpose of establishing a list of suitable candidates to fill posts of:’.

On page 2, in Section A.1, ‘Introduction’, first paragraph:

On page 2, in Section A.1, ‘Introduction’, first paragraph:

for:

for:

‘The European Parliament has decided to open the procedure for filling eleven temporary Close Protection Officer posts (AST 3) in the Directorate-General for Security and Safety, Directorate for Proximity and Assistance, Security and Safety.’,

read:

read:

‘The European Parliament has decided to open the procedure for filling temporary Close Protection Officer posts (AST 3) in the Directorate-General for Security and Safety, Directorate for Proximity and Assistance, Security and Safety.’

---
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–556 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE 

HOUSE AMENDMENT TO THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE BILL (H.R. 

4213) TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO EXTEND 

CERTAIN EXPIRING PROVISIONS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JULY 22, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1550] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1550, by a vote of 7 to 3, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 

amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to 

H.R. 4213, the Unemployment Compensation Extension Act of 

2010. The resolution makes in order a motion offered by the chair 

of the Committee on Ways and Means that the House concur in the 

Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 4213. The resolution provides one hour of debate on 

the motion equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the motion 

except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Finally, the resolution provides that the Senate amendment shall be considered as 

read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the motion (except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI) the 

Committee is not aware of any points of order against the motion. 

The waiver of all points of order against the motion is prophylactic. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with HEARINGS

2 

Rules Committee record vote No. 470 

Date: July 22, 2010. 

Measure: Senate amendment to House amendment to Senate 

amendment to H.R. 4213. 

Motion by: Mr. Diaz-Balart, L. 

Summary of motion: To make in order and provide appropriate 

waivers for a substitute amendment by Rep. Heller (#1), which 

would extend unemployment insurance, COBRA, and the current 

poverty guidelines until the end of September and is paid for with 

unused funds from the stimulus bill. 

Results: Defeated 3–7. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings—Nay; Matsui— 

Nay; Cardoza—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; Pingree—Nay; Diaz-Balart— 

Yea; Sessions—Yea; Foxx—Yea; Slaughter—Nay. 

Rules Committee record vote No. 471 

Date: July 22, 2010. 

Measure: Senate amendment to House amendment to Senate 

amendment to H.R. 4213. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 7–3. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Hastings—Yea; Matsui—Yea; 

Cardoza—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; Pingree—Yea; Diaz-Balart— Nay; Sessions—Nay; Foxx—Nay; Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with HEARINGS
#### August J. C. EGLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ann E. Schraedel EGLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 82-3037.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 17, 1982.

Flaxman & Flaxman, Charles Flaxman, Coral Gables, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Abrams & Abrams, Edward C. Vining, Jr., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEE, GARZA and TATE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal of a civil action was taken from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone, a court that ceased to exist as of April 1, 1982, pursuant to an international agreement between the Republic of Panama and the United States. See Panama Canal Treaty, done September 7, 1977, *reprinted in*16 Int’l. Leg.Mat. 1022 (1977), art. XI. On March 31, 1982, in an unpublished opinion filed in the last hour of the Canal Zone District Court’s existence, a divided panel of this court, without the benefit of oral argument, affirmed the district court’s judgment. 673 F.2d 1326. The appellant, Mrs. Egle, has now filed a timely petition for rehearing, which is before us for consideration.

If we have jurisdiction to do so, we should consider the matters raised by the motion. However, in light of the Panama Canal Treaty and the abolition of the United States District Court in the former Canal Zone, we are in doubt whether this court retains jurisdiction to consider the appeal further. We are also uncertain as to how, if this court is without jurisdiction, this case should be disposed. Must the case be dismissed, or is there provision for transfer of such a pending case to the Panamanian court of proper jurisdiction?

In hope of receiving guidance, we request the litigants to submit supplemental briefs on these issues. Furthermore, we request the Legal Adviser of the United States Department of State to inform the court, by letter or *amicas curiae*brief, of the executive branch’s opinion on these issues.

The clerk of court is instructed to contact the litigants and the Legal Adviser in regard to the establishment of a supplemental briefing schedule.
Moffett B. Roller

mroller@rollerbauer.com Law Offices



## R OLLER 

## & B

AUER, PLLC Washington Dulles International Airport 45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200 Dulles, VA 20166 Phone: 202-331-3300 • Fax: 202-331-3322 Lee A. Bauer lbauer@rollerbauer.com October 3, 2014 Mr. Robert Finamore Foreign Carrier Licensing Division Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Polling Report: Application of Jetstar Japan Co., Ltd. for Exemption and Statement of

Authorization; Docket DOT-OST-2014-0176 Dear Mr. Finamore: In confirmation of our initial email notification of October 2, 2014, we have polled the U.S. carriers on the Service List that was attached to the Application of Jetstar Japan Co., Ltd. for Exemption and Statement of Authorization. None of the U.S. carriers on the Service List has any objection to DOT approval of the Amended Application, and we therefore respectfully request the Department to expedite approval of the Application. The Application seeks the authority necessary for Jetstar Japan to codeshare with American Airlines by displaying the AA* code on flights operated by Jetstar Japan. The inital codesharing will be on ten city-pairs within Japan,but the Application seeks as broad an authorization as possible under the U.S.-Japan bilateral. American Airlines' current codesharing arrangement with Japan Airlines to the Japanese points in question is ending in the next few weeks, and Jetstar Japan requests expedited approval of it Application so that Jetstar Japan and American Airlines can implement the new codesharing arrangement with a minimum of disruption and inconvenience to passengers. We are serving copies of this letter by email on all parties that were served with the original Application. Respectfully submitted, ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC Attorneys for Jetstar Japan Co., Ltd.

By: ___________________________ Moffett B. Roller

cc: Service List
#### Harold Robinson, Respondent-Appellant, v Helen J. Bartron, as Steuben County Treasurer and Administratrix of the Estate of Robert K. Perry, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Judgment as modified by order of July 6, 1976 unanimously affirmed, without costs. (Appeal from judgment of Steuben Supreme Court — negligence.) Present — Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
#### 233.102 General.

If the Government exercises the authority provided in 239.7305(d) to limit disclosure of information, no action undertaken by the Government under such authority shall be subject to review in a bid protest before the GAOor in any Federal court (see subpart 239.73).

[78 FR 69271, Nov. 18, 2013, as amended at 87 FR 15811, Mar. 18, 2022]
401.371 AGAR Advisories. The SPE may issue AGAR Advisories, consistent with the policies of the FAR and the AGAR, for the following purposes: ( a ) To communicate Department-wide policy and/or procedural guidance to contracting activities;
( b ) To delegate to procurement officials authority to make determinations or to take action to implement the policies of the FAR or the AGAR; and,
( c ) To establish internal policy and procedures on an interim basis, prior to incorporation in the AGAR or in a Departmental Directive.
( d ) AGAR Advisories are only available in electronic format on the USDA Procurement Web site at *http://www.usda.gov/procurement/ .*
[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996, as amended at 70 FR 44, Jan. 3, 2005]
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

                           Certification of CEO and CFO

**                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**                              As Adopted Pursuant to**

**                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Real Estate Associates Limited VI (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), JohnMcGrath, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
#### 3417.501 General.

No other Federal department or agency may purchase property or services under contracts established or administered by FSA unless the purchase is approved by SPE for the requesting Federal department or agency.
405.502 Authority. ( a ) The authority vested in the agency head to authorize publication of paid advertisements in newspapers (44 U.S.C. 3702) is delegated, with power of redelegation, to HCA's. HCA redelegation of this authority shall be in writing.
( b ) Policies and procedures regarding prior authorization required for media other than newspapers are contained in USDA Departmental Regulations 1400 series.