6868 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 14 / Monday, January 25, 2021 / Notices 

9See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 884 (Jan.15, 

2021). 

Company 

Net subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S ..................................................................................................................................... 1.18 

Guner Eksport ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1.18 

Guven Celik Born San. Ve Tic. Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 1.18 

Guven Steel Pipe ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1.18 

Kalibre Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret AS ...................................................................................................................................................... 1.18 

MTS Lojistik ve Tasimacilik Hizmetleri TIC A.S. Istanbul ................................................................................................................... 1.18 

Net Boru Sanayi ve Dis Ticaret Koll. Sti ............................................................................................................................................. 1.18 

Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi AS .............................................................................................................................................................. 1.18 

Perfektup Ambalaj San. ve Tic. A.S .................................................................................................................................................... 1.18 

Schenker Arkas Nakliyat ve Ticaret A.S ............................................................................................................................................. 1.18 

Umran Celik Born Sanayii A.S ............................................................................................................................................................ 1.18 

Umran Steel Pipe Inc .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1.18 

Vespro Muhendislik Mimarlik Danismanlik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS ....................................................................................................... 1.18 

Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S., Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S., and Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

(Yucel Companies) ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1.18 

* (de minimis) 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results of review within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Consistent with its recent notice,9

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) no earlier than 35 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review in the Federal 

Register. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

Because we have calculated a de 

minimis countervailable subsidy rate for 

the Borusan Companies, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to countervailing 

duties in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212. We will instruct CBP to 

liquidate shipments of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by the remaining above listed 

companies, entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse for consumption from 

January 1, 2018 through December 31, 

2018, at the ad valorem rates listed 

above for each respective company. 

Cash Deposit Instructions 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we intend to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties, in the 

amounts shown above, with the 

exception of the Borusan Companies, on 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. Because the countervailable 

subsidy rate for the Borusan Companies 

is de minimis, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits at a rate of 

zero for the Borusan Companies for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

that are entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of the final 

results of this administrative review. For 

all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct 

CBP to continue to collect cash deposits 

of estimated countervailing duties at the 

most-recent company specific or allothers rate applicable to the company, 

as appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to APO of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 15, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Period of Review 

V. Non-Shipment Claims 

VI. Non-Selected Rate 

VII. Subsidies Valuation Information 

VIII. Analysis of Programs 

IX. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether to Include Purchases 

of All Series Grades of Hot-Rolled Steel 

(HRS) in the HRS Benchmark to Measure 

the Adequacy of Remuneration for HRS 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Istikbal’s Export Credit Bank of 

Turkey (Eximbank) Loan in the Benefit 

Analysis for Short Term Pre-Shipment 

Rediscount Program 

X. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01497 Filed 1–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–870] 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

From the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that certain oil country tubular goods 

(OCTG) from the Republic of Korea 

(Korea) are being sold in the United 

States at prices below normal value. The 

period of review (POR) is September 1, 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 14 / Monday, January 25, 2021 / Notices 6869 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

61011 (November 12, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘2018–2019 Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: 

Respondent Selection,’’ dated December 23, 2019. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated April 24, 2020 

(First Tolling Memorandum). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea, 2018– 

2019: Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated June 30, 2020 (First Extension of 

Preliminary Review Results Memorandum). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020 

(Second Tolling Memorandum). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea, 2018– 

2019: Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated November 25, 2020 (Second 

Extension of Preliminary Review Results 

Memorandum). 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results in the 2018–2019 

Administrative Review of Oil Country Tubular 

Goods from the Republic of Korea’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

8See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic 

of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691 (September 10, 

2014) (Order). 

9For a complete discussion, see Memorandum, 

‘‘2018–2019 Administrative Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: 

Decisions on Particular Market Situation 

Allegations,’’ dated concurrently with this Federal 

Register Notice (PMS Memorandum). 

10See PMS Memorandum. 

11For more information regarding the calculation 

of this margin, see Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary 

Results of the 2018–2019 Administrative Review of 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the 

Republic of Korea; Calculation of the Margin for 

Non-Examined Companies,’’ dated concurrently 

with this memorandum. 

2018 through August 31, 2019. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable January 25, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Davina Friedmann, Mark Flessner, or 

Frank Schmitt, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0698, 

(202) 482–6312, or (202) 482–4880, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

These preliminary results are made in 

accordance with section 733(b) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of this administrative review 

on November 12, 2019.1 Commerce 

selected Hyundai Steel Company 

(Hyundai Steel) and SeAH Steel 

Corporation (SeAH) as the two 

mandatory respondents in this review.2

On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all 

deadlines in administrative reviews by 

50 days.3 On June 30, 2020, Commerce 

extended the deadline of the 

preliminary results of review by 100 

days, until October 29, 2020, in 

accordance with 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act.4 On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled 

all deadlines in administrative reviews 

by an additional 60 days,5 thereby 

extending the deadline for these 

preliminary results until December 28, 

2020. On November 25, 2020, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, Commerce extended the 

preliminary results of review by an 

additional 18 days, until January 15, 

2021.6

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 

dated concurrently with these 

preliminary results and hereby adopted 

by this notice.7 A list of topics included 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed and the electronic versions 

of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order 8 is 

OCTG from Korea. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(2) of the Act. 

Commerce has calculated export prices 

in accordance with section 772(a) of the 

Act. Constructed export prices have 

been calculated in accordance with 

section 772(b) of the Act. Normal value 

(NV) is calculated in accordance with 

section 773 of the Act. Commerce 

preliminarily finds that a cost-based 

particular market situation (PMS) 

existed in Korea during the POR 

concerning the cost of hot-rolled coil 

(HRC) as a component of the cost of 

production for the OCTG that Hyundai 

Steel and SeAH produced.9 We 

quantified the impact of the particular 

market situation on the material cost of 

HRC, and derived a corresponding 

adjustment factor that, when applied to 

the cost of HRC, accounts for the 

distortions induced by the observed 

particular market situation.10 For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Rates for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the rate to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weighted 

average of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

In this review, we have preliminarily 

calculated weighted-average dumping 

margins for SeAH that is not zero, de 

minimis, or determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. Accordingly, 

Commerce preliminarily has assigned to 

the companies not individually 

examined (see Appendix II for a full list 

of these companies) a margin of 1.07 

percent, which is the weighted average 

dumping margin of SeAH for these 

preliminary results of review.11

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that, for the period September 1, 2018 

through August 31, 2019, the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist: 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
6870 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 14 / Monday, January 25, 2021 / Notices 

12See Appendix II. 

13See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

14See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements); see also Temporary Rule Modifying 

AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 

85 FR 17006 (March 26, 2020); and Temporary Rule 

Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to 

COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

16See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 

17See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 

18See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

19See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

20See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

21See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

22See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

23See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony With Final Determination, 81 FR 59603 

(August 30, 2016). 

Exporter/producer 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. 0.00 

SeAH Steel Corporation ............. 1.07 

Non-examined companies 12 ...... 1.07 

Disclosure, Public Comment, and 

Opportunity To Request a Hearing 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

of review to interested parties within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c), interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, the content of 

which is limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed no later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.13 Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.14

Parties who submit case briefs or 

rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.15 Case and 

rebuttal briefs should be filed using 

ACCESS 16 and must be served on 

interested parties.17 Executive 

summaries should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS. An electronically filed request 

must be received successfully in its 

entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days of the date of publication 

of this notice.18 Requests should 

contain: (1) The party’s name, address 

and telephone number; (2) the number 

of participants; and (3) a list of issues 

parties intend to discuss. Issues raised 

in the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing 

is made, Commerce intends to hold the 

hearing at a time and date to be 

determined.19 Parties should confirm 

the date, time, and location of the 

hearing two days before the scheduled 

date. 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised in any case or rebuttal 

briefs, no later than 120 days after the 

date of publication of this notice, unless 

extended.20

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of this 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For any individually examined 

respondent whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in 

the final results of this review, if the 

respondent reported reliable entered 

values, we will calculate importerspecific ad valorem assessment rates for 

the merchandise based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales made to each 

importer and the total entered value of 

those same sales, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has 

not reported reliable entered values, we 

will calculate a per-unit assessment rate 

for each importer by dividing the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

examined sales made to that importer by 

the total sales quantity associated with 

those transactions. Where an importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of review, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If 

a respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis 

in the final results of review, we will 

instruct CBP not to assess duties on any 

of its entries in accordance with the 

Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., 

‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin 

of dumping for the exporter is 

determined to be zero or de minimis, no 

antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 21

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Hyundai 

Steel or SeAH for which the producer 

did not know its merchandise was 

destined for the United States, or for any 

respondent for which we have a final 

determination of no shipments, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.22

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of this administrative review for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication, as provided by section 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 

rate for the companies listed in the final 

results of review will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which they were reviewed; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the producer is, then 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 5.24 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.23 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 14 / Monday, January 25, 2021 / Notices 6871 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

61011 (November 12, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 

2POSCO reported that the company formerly 

known as Daewoo International Corporation (DWI) 

and POSCO Daewoo (PDW) now does business as 

PIC. See POSCO/PDW’s Letter, ‘‘Cold-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Republic of Korea; 2018– 

2019: POSCO’s Respondent Selection Comments,’’ 

dated December 11, 2019, at 2–3. In its 

questionnaire response, POSCO subsequently 

reported that PDW became PIC on March 18, 2019. 

See POSCO Section A Initial Questionnaire 

Response, dated February 18, 2020 at 1 and A–1. 

Based on our analysis in the instant review, we are 

preliminarily collapsing POSCO and PIC, which we 

find to be the successor-in-interest to PDW. See 

Memorandum, ‘‘Third Administrative Review of 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic 

of Korea: POSCO and POSCO International 

Corporation Affiliation and Collapsing 

Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with these 

preliminary results. Accordingly, hereafter we refer 

to the collapsed entity as ‘‘POSCO/PIC.’’ 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘2018–2019 Administrative 

Review of Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 

Republic of Korea: Respondent Selection,’’ dated 

January 15, 2020. 

4The petitioners are ArcelorMittal USA LLC, AK 

Steel Corporation, Nucor Corporation, Steel 

Dynamics, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation 

(collectively, the petitioners). 

5See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Cold-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from the Republic of Korea: Petitioners’ 

Partial Withdrawal of Request for Review,’’ dated 

February 5, 2020. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 20, 2020. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

The preliminary results of this 

administrative review are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: January 15, 2021. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 

V. Affiliation 

VI. Discussion of Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies Not Individually 

Examined 

1. AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. 

2. Blue Sea Precision Tube Co., Ltd. 

3. Bo Myung Metal Co., Ltd. 

4. BUMA CE Co., Ltd. 

5. Busung Steel Co., Ltd. 

6. Chang Won Bending Co., Ltd. 

7. Daeho P&C Co., Ltd. 

8. Daou Precision Ind. Co. 

9. Dongyang Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. 

10. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 

11. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

12. EEW Korea Co., Ltd. 

13. Global Solutions Co., Ltd. 

14. Hansol Metal Co., Ltd. 

15. HiSteel Co., Ltd. 

16. HPP Co., Ltd. 

17. Husteel Co., Ltd. 

18. Hyundai Group 

19. Hyundai Corporation 

20. Hyundai HYSCO 

21. Hyundai RB Co., Ltd. 

22. Hyundai Steel Company 

23. ILJIN Steel Corporation 

24. Keonwoo Metals Co., Ltd. 

25. K Steel Corporation 

26. KF UBIS Co., Ltd. 

27. Korea Steel Co., Ltd. 

28. Kukje Steel Co., Ltd. 

29. KPF Co., Ltd. 

30. Kumkang Kind Co., Ltd. 

31. Kumsoo Connecting Co., Ltd. 

32. Master Steel Corporation 

33. MCK Co., Ltd. 

34. MS Pipe Co., Ltd. 

35. Msteel Co., Ltd. 

36. Nexen Corporation 

37. NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. 

38. Pneumatic Plus Korea Co., Ltd. 

39. POSCO International Corporation 

40. PSG Co., Ltd. 

41. Pusan Fitting Corporation 

42. SeAH FS Co., Ltd. 

43. SeAH Steel Corporation 

44. Sejong Ind. Co., Ltd. 

45. Seokyoung Steel & Technology Co., Ltd. 

46. SIC Tube Co., Ltd. 

47. ST Tubular Inc. 

48. Sungkwang Bend Co., Ltd. 

49. TGS Pipe Co., Ltd. 

50. TJ Glovsteel Co., Ltd. 

51. TSP Corporation 

52. Union Pipe MFG Co., Ltd. 

53. WSG Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2021–01498 Filed 1–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–881] 

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) 

and POSCO/POSCO International 

Corporation (PIC), the two companies 

selected for individual examination, did 

not sell certain cold-rolled steel flat 

products (cold-rolled steel) from the 

Republic of Korea (Korea) in the United 

States at prices below normal value 

during the period of review (POR) 

September 1, 2018 through August 31, 

2019. Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable January 25, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney, George McMahon, or 

Marc Castillo, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475, 

(202) 482–1167, or (202) 482–5019, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

These preliminary results are made in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

On November 12, 2019, based on timely 

requests for review, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on cold-rolled 

steel from Korea for 38 companies.1

Commerce selected Hyundai and 

POSCO/POSCO International 

Corporation (hereafter, POSCO/PIC) 2 as 

the two mandatory respondents in this 

review.3 On February 5, 2020, the 

petitioners 4 withdrew their request for 

review of all companies except for 

Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd., Dongbu 

Steel Co., Ltd., Hyundai, POSCO, PDW, 

and PIC.5

On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled 

all deadlines in administrative reviews 

by 50 days.6 On July 20, 2020, 

Commerce extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results by 100 days, in 

accordance with 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act.7 On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled 

all deadlines in administrative reviews 

by an additional 60 days.8 On December 

3, 2020, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, Commerce 

extended the preliminary results of 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES