alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
34.005-2 Mission-oriented solicitation. ( a ) Before issuing the solicitation, whenever practicable and consistent with agency procedures, the contracting officer should take the actions outlined in subparagraphs (1) and (2): ( 1 ) Advance notification of the acquisition should be given the widest practicable dissemination, including publicizing through the Governmentwide point of entry (see subpart 5.2) and should be sent to as wide a selection of potential sources as practicable, including smaller and newer firms, Government laboratories, federally funded research and development centers, educational institutions and other not-for-profit organizations, and, if it would be beneficial and is not prohibited, foreign sources.
( 2 ) If appropriate, hold a presolicitation conference (see 15.201) and/or send copies of the proposed solicitation to all prospective offerors for their comments. After evaluation of these comments, the solicitation should be revised, if appropriate.
( b ) The contracting officer shall send the final solicitation to all prospective offerors. It shall— ( 1 ) Describe the nature of the need in terms of mission capabilities required, without reference to any specific systems to satisfy the need;
( 2 ) Indicate, and explain when appropriate, the schedule, capability, and cost objectives and any known constraints in the acquisition;
( 3 ) Provide, or indicate how access can be obtained to, all Government data related to the acquisition;
( 4 ) Include selection requirements consistent with the acquisition strategy; and
( 5 ) Clearly state that each offeror is free to propose its own technical approach, main design features, subsystems, and alternatives to schedule, cost, and capability goals.
( 6 ) Require the use of an Earned Value Management System that complies with the guidelines of Electronic Industries Alliance Standard 748 (EIA-748) (current version at time of solicitation). See 34.201 for earned value management systems and reporting requirements.
( c ) To the extent practicable, the solicitation shall not reference or mandate Government specifications or standards, unless the agency is mandating a subsystem or other component as approved under agency procedure.
[48 FR 42351, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1744, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985; 62 FR 51271, Sept. 30, 1997; 66 FR 27414, May 16, 2001; 71 FR 38245, July 5, 2006; 81 FR 83103, Nov. 18, 2016]
#### 339.204 Exceptions.
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 25 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2023 

Ms. PRESSLEY (for herself, Ms. SPANBERGER, Ms. BUSH, Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania, Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. 

BONAMICI, Mr. KEATING, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. JACOBS, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. 

SABLAN, Mr. THANEDAR, Mr. PETERS, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. NADLER, 

Mr. TORRES of New York, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. GREEN of 

Texas, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. BERA, Mr. CARSON, Mr. 

KIM of New Jersey, Ms. CRAIG, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. BALINT, Mr. 

PASCRELL, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. 

PETTERSEN, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. DELUZIO, Mr. PAPPAS, Ms. HOULAHAN, 

Mr. ALLRED, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. SOTO, Mr. TRONE, 

Mr. PHILLIPS, Mrs. DINGELL, Ms. ROSS, Mr. KILMER, Ms. TITUS, Mr. 

PAYNE, Mr. BEYER, Mr. EVANS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. NORTON, Ms. 

SLOTKIN, Mr. SWALWELL, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Ms. MENG, Mr. STANTON, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. 

STEVENS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. CUELLAR, Ms. OMAR, Mrs. 

HAYES, Mr. AUCHINCLOSS, Mr. BOWMAN, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. RASKIN, 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GOLDEN of Maine, Mr. CROW, Ms. WEXTON, Mr. 

GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. TOKUDA, Mr. COSTA, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. PANETTA, 

Mr. NEGUSE, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. MORELLE, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. CHU, 

Ms. BROWNLEY, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. MANNING, Ms. PORTER, 

Mr. MULLIN, Ms. SCHRIER, Mr. MFUME, Ms. UNDERWOOD, Ms. 

SA ́NCHEZ, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. DOGGETT, Ms. 

LOIS FRANKEL of Florida, Mrs. TRAHAN, Mr. VEASEY, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Mr. POCAN, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. 

BARRAGA ́N, Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia, Mrs. TORRES of California, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. AGUILAR, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. 

TLAIB, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. 

ROBERT GARCIA of California, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. 

GALLEGO, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. CASTEN, Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, 

Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. BROWN, Ms. WILD, Mrs. LEE of Nevada, Ms. 

DELBENE, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. CARTER of Louisiana, Ms. HOYLE of Oregon, and Ms. CLARKE of New York) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 25 IH 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 

amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding any time limit contained in House 

4 Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed to in the 

5 Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment pro6 posed to the States in that joint resolution is valid to all 

7 intents and purposes as part of the United States Con8 stitution having been ratified by the legislatures of three9 fourths of the several States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.10


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                 OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CILCORP INC.
                         (required by Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection  with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended June
30,  2004 of CILCORP  Inc.  (the  "Company")  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"),  I, Warner L. Baxter,
chief financial officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Form 10-Q fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 9, 2004



                                        /s/ Warner L. Baxter
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Warner L. Baxter
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2019406EN.01000201.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/2

---

Appointment of the First Advocate General

(2019/C 406/02)

At its General Meeting on 24 September 2019, the Court of Justice appointed, in accordance with Article 14(1) of the Rules of Procedure, Mr Szpunar as First Advocate General for the period from 7 October 2019 to 6 October 2020.

---
2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE 84.326R

Absolute Priority: 

Organization: 

Project Title: 

Start Date: 

End Date: 

Project Director: 

Full Name: 

Address Line 1: 

Address Line 2: 

City: 

State: 

Zip Code: 

Telephone: 

Email: 

Average Time on

Project, Year 1 (%)*: 

*Example: enter .2532 for 25.32%.

Additional Key Personnel (not including project director/s listed above): 

Full Name / Degree Program 

Position / Average 

Time on Project, 

Year 1 (%)* 

*Example: enter .2532 for 25.32%.

Email 
 

 

2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE: 84.326R PAGE 2 

Briefly describe the purpose and expected outcomes. (100 words or fewer) 

Briefly describe how the project will be designed, managed, and evaluated to 

address the identified outcomes. (100 words or fewer) 
Disability (or disabilities) focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

 

 

 

2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE: 84.326R PAGE 3 

Autism 

Deaf-blindness 

Deafness 

Developmental delay (DD) 

Emotional disturbance (ED) 

Hearing impairment 

Intellectual disability 

Multiple disabilities 

Orthopedic impairment 

Other health impairment 

Specific learning disability 

Speech or language impairment 

Traumatic brain injury 

Visual impairment 

Age group(s) of students with disabilities focused on by the project 

(check all that apply): 

Birth to 3 

Preschool 

Elementary School 

Middle School 

High School 

Postsecondary 

Target content area(s) focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

Assessment 

Behavior 

Early Childhood 

Inclusive Practices 

Instructional Strategies 

Literacy 

STEM 

MTSS 

Data Collection, Analysis and Use (373) 

ELs with Disabilities 

Accessible Educational Materials 

Technology Research and Development 

Assistive and Instructional Technology 

Transition Services 

Dropout Prevention 

Family Engagement 

Related Services 

Dispute Resolution 

Geography focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

Urban Suburban Rural
4.900 Scope of subpart. This subpart provides policies and procedures for obtaining— ( a ) Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) information that may be used for debt collection purposes; and
( b ) Contract information and payment information for submittal to the payment office for Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reporting purposes.
#### 415.305 Proposal evaluation.

HCAs are responsible for establishing procedures regarding the release of cost information to the members of the technical evaluation team.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains Summary Financial Information extracted from the
Quarterly Report for the three months ended March 31, 1998 of Carrols
Corporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statement.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                   $   2,189,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  496,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,055,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,843,000
<PP&E>                                     143,643,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              70,569,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             213,847,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,504,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,750,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               213,847,000
<SALES>                                     87,451,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            87,451,000
<CGS>                                       25,391,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               74,443,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,334,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                722,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   327,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            395,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   395,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### 327.303 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.227-11, Patent Rights—Exceptional Circumstances and any appropriate alternates in lieu of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.227-11 whenever a Determination of Exceptional Circumstances (DEC) involving the provision of materials that has been executed in accordance with Agency policy and procedures calls for its use and the clause at 352.227-11, Patent Rights—Exceptional Circumstances, appropriately covers the circumstances. The contracting officer should reference the DEC in the solicitation and shall attach a copy of the executed DEC to the contract.
Exhibit
32.1








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF


AMEREN
CORPORATION


(required
by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)








In
connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2008 of Ameren Corporation (the “Registrant”) as filed by the
Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Form 10-Q”), each undersigned officer of the Registrant does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








Date:  November
10, 2008








/s/ Gary L.
Rainwater


Gary L.
Rainwater


Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)











/s/ Warner L.
Baxter


Warner L.
Baxter


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Centex
Corporation's December 31, 1996, Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000018532
<NAME> CENTEX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          73,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  957,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,063,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         391,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                 188,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,600,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        224,504
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,196
<OTHER-SE>                                     795,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,600,521
<SALES>                                      2,833,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,833,121
<CGS>                                        2,648,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,648,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,642
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,522
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
43.104 Notification of contract changes. ( a ) When a contractor considers that the Government has effected or may effect a change in the contract that has not been identified as such in writing and signed by the contracting officer, it is necessary that the contractor notify the Government in writing as soon as possible. This will permit the Government to evaluate the alleged change and ( 1 ) confirm that it is a change, direct the mode of further performance, and plan for its funding;
( 2 ) countermand the alleged change; or
( 3 ) notify the contractor that no change is considered to have occurred.
( b ) The clause at 52.243-7, Notification of Changes, which is prescribed in 43.107, ( 1 ) incorporates the policy expressed in paragraph (a) above;
( 2 ) requires the contractor to notify the Government promptly of any Government conduct that the contractor considers a change to the contract, and
( 3 ) specifies the responsibilities of the contractor and the Government with respect to such notifications.
[48 FR 42386, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 56 FR 41744, Aug. 22, 1991]
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 157 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries 

Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 

Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical 

Habitat’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Ms. HAGEMAN (for herself, Mr. NEWHOUSE, Ms. MALOY, Ms. BOEBERT, and 

Mr. ZINKE) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the National Marine Fisheries Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing 

Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating 

Critical Habitat’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Na4 tional Marine Fisheries Service relating to ‘‘Endangered 

5 and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Endangered 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 157 IH 

1 and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habi2 tat’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 24300 (April 5, 2024)), and such rule 

3 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

I, Christopher M. Capone, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central
      Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the "Companies") for the period ended
      June 30, 2005 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Companies.

Date: August 5, 2005

                                              /s/ Christopher M. Capone
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                                  Christopher M. Capone
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                              of CH Energy Group, Inc.


                                              /s/ Christopher M. Capone
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                                  Christopher M. Capone
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                    of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CH Energy Group, Inc. and to Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation and will be retained by CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson Gas
& Electric Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]


                                       58
#### In the Matter of Allen Shapiro, Appellant, v Edward Hammock, as Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Board of Parole, dated October 26, 1977, which denied petitioner his release on parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 9, 1978, which denied the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The seriousness of the offenses in this case, where the petitioner is serving concurrent sentences on convictions of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, burglary in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, constitutes a sufficient and meaningful reason for the board’s action in denying parole (see *Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole,*57 AD2d 955; see, also, *Matter of Hintze v New York State Bd. of Parole,*66 AD2d 848, especially the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice Suozzi, p 849). In seeking to distinguish *Consilvio*on its facts petitioner is asking that we review the board’s discretion. This we may not do (see Correction Law, former § 212, subd [10]; Executive Law, § 259-i, subd 5; *Matter of Briguglio v New York State Bd. of Parole,*24 NY2d 21, 29; cf. *Solari v Vincent,*46 AD2d 453, revd on the ground of mootness 38 NY2d 835). On this record, there was no denial of due process. The case on which petitioner relies *(Addonizio v United States,*573 F2d 147) is inapposite. Release is not a reward for good conduct and must not be incompatible with the welfare of society (Correction Law, former § 213). It must "not so deprecate the seriousness of [the] crime as to undermine respect for law” (Executive Law, § 259-i, subd 2, par [c]). Damiani, J. P., Titone, O’Connor and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Fourth Department,

September, 1964

(September 17, 1964)

#### Helen Goff, Appellant, v. Dairymen’s League Coop. Assn., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Appeal dismissed unless records and appellant’s briefs are filed and served on or before October 30, 1964. Cross motion of appellants to appeal as a poor person denied, without prejudice to the right of appellant to move for such relief before the trial court. (See *Jenks*v. *Murphy,*21 A D 2d 346.)