alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

Antitrust Division

CHRISTINE A. VARNEY

Assistant Attorney General

Main Justice Building

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

(202) 514·24011 (202) 616-2645 (Fax)

E-mail: antitrust@usdoj.gov

Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/atr

May 8, 2009

Eric J. Fygi

Acting General Counsel

Department ofEnergy

Washington, DC 20585

Dear Acting General Counsel Fygi:

I am responding to your March 30, 2009 letter seeking the views ofthe Attorney General

about the potential impact on competition of proposed amended energy conservation standards

for commercial packaged boilers and certain commercial packaged air-conditions and heat

pumps. Your request was submitted pursuant to Section 325(0)(2)(B)(i)(V) ofthe Energy Policy

and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.c. § 6295(0)(2)(B)(i)(V), which requires the Attorney

General to make a determination ofthe impact of any lessening of competition that is likely to

result from the imposition ofproposed energy conservation standards. The Attorney General's

responsibility for responding to requests from other departments about the effect of a program on

competition has been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division in 28

C.F.R. § OAO(g).

In conducting its analysis, the Antitrust Division examines whether a proposed standard

may lessen competition, for example, by substantially limiting consumer choice leaving

consumers with fewer competitive alternatives, placing certain manufacturers ofa product at an

unjustified competitive disadvantage compared to other manufacturers; or by inducing avoidable

inefficiencies in production or distribution of particular products.

We have reviewed the proposed standards and the supplementary information submitted

to the Attorney General, and attended the April 7, 2009 public hearing on the proposed standards.

EERE-2008-BT-STD-0013 COMMENT 15
Eric J. Fygi

May 8, 2009

Page 2

We have concluded that the proposed standards are not likely to have an adverse effect on

competition. In reaching this conclusion, we note the absence of any competitive concerns raised

by industry participants at the hearing. Indeed, the efficiency levels in the proposed standards are

based on a consensus recommendation submitted by efficiency advocacy groups and the trade

association for manufacturers of commercial packaged boilers. Based on these facts, we believe

the new standard would not likely reduce competition.

EERE-2008-BT-STD-0013 COMMENT 15
339.205 Section 508 accessibility standards for contracts. ( a ) Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794(d)), as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Section 508), specifies the applicable accessibility standards for all new solicitations and new or existing contracts or orders, regardless of EIT dollar amount.
( b ) The requiring activity shall consult with the OPDIV or STAFFDIV Section 508 Official or designee, as necessary, to determine the applicability of Section 508, identify applicable Section 508 accessibility standards, and resolve any related issues before forwarding a request to the contracting or procurement office for the acquisition of EIT supplies and services—including Web site content and communications material for which the contractor must meet EIT accessibility standards.
( c ) Based on those discussions, the requiring activity shall provide a statement in the AP (or other acquisition request document) for Section 508 applicability. See 307.105. If Section 508 applies to an acquisition, include the provision at 352.239-73, Electronic and Information Technology and Accessibility Notice, language in a separate, clearly designated, section of the statement of work or performance work statement, along with any additional information applicable to the acquisition's Section 508 accessibility standards (e.g., the list of applicable accessibility standards of the Access Board EIT Accessibility Standards (36 CFR part 1194)). If an AP does not address Section 508 applicability and it appears an acquisition involves Section 508, or if the discussion of Section 508 applicability to the acquisition is inadequate or incomplete, the contracting officer shall request the requiring activity modify the AP accordingly.
( d ) Items provided incidental to contract administration are not subject to this section.
( e ) The OPDIV Section 508 Official or designee may, at his or her discretion, require review and approval of solicitations and contracts for EIT supplies and services.
Honorable Susan M. Collins
  United States Senate
  Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Collins:

Thank you for your letter relating to the problems of diploma mills and the fraudulent credentials that they issue. I share your concern that these operations threaten to devalue the legitimate education credentials of millions of Americans.

While I appreciate the value that could be realized from the creation of a definitive list of diploma mills, developing such a list poses potential difficulties for the Department of Education. As you know, the Department of Education has no oversight or regulatory authority over institutions that do not participate in the programs included in the Higher Education Act. Thus, we have no independent authority or ability to determine if such a school is a diploma mill. That decision is best made by appropriate regulators in the State in which the school is located.

I, nevertheless, recognize that this problem is serious and requires careful consideration by the Department as to whether a federal response is appropriate. I understand that a number of states, including Oregon, North Dakota, Illinois, and New Jersey, have enacted laws that seek to restrict the operation of diploma mills and the use of fraudulent credentials. I have asked Assistant Secretary Sally L. Stroup, who heads the Office of Postsecondary Education, to convene a meeting of officials from these states, representatives of your office and of the Office of Personnel Management to discuss whether a federal response is appropriate and to help Federal personnel managers identify fraudulent educational credentials.

I appreciate your interest in this issue and pledge the full cooperation of the Department of Education in seeking a resolution.

Sincerely,

/s/

Rod Paige

|Last Modified: 10/22/2003
|-------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 2, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                         1018000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5368000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (361000)
<INVENTORY>                                    8923000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15745000
<PP&E>                                        21102000
<DEPRECIATION>                                16883000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                19978000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         14122000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        366000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (598000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  19978000
<SALES>                                        7454000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7454000
<CGS>                                          5992000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6691000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                137000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                361000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              151000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 626000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     24000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             602000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    602000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Equitex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Henry Fong, President,
Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



                                       /s/ Henry Fong
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Henry Fong
                                       President, Treasurer and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       April 15, 2005


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO EQUITEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EQUITEX, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 24 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council 

in approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress disapproves of the action of the District 

4 of Columbia Council described as follows: The 
2 

•HJ 24 EH 

1 Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022 

2 (D.C. Act 24–640), enacted by the Council of the District 

3 of Columbia on November 21, 2022, and transmitted to 

4 Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of the District of 

5 Columbia Home Rule Act on January 10, 2023. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 9, 

2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 24 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia 

Rights Amendment Act of 2022. Council in approving the Local Resident Voting
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 463 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 463

 Authorizing a Senator to bring a young son or daughter of the Senator 
               onto the floor of the Senate during votes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 12, 2018

 Mr. Durbin (for Ms. Duckworth (for herself and Mr. Durbin)) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 
                           and Administration

                             April 18, 2018

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing a Senator to bring a young son or daughter of the Senator 
               onto the floor of the Senate during votes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR SENATORS TO BRING YOUNG CHILDREN ONTO THE 
              FLOOR OF THE SENATE.

    Notwithstanding rule XXIII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, a 
Senator who has a son or daughter (as defined in section 101 of the 
Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2611)) under 1 year of 
age may bring the son or daughter onto the floor of the Senate during 
votes.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,780
<SECURITIES>                                   864,434
<RECEIVABLES>                                  781,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                   190,200
<INVENTORY>                                    168,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               786,034
<PP&E>                                         170,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,733,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          801,824
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    195,172
<COMMON>                                           971
<OTHER-SE>                                     735,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,733,793
<SALES>                                        654,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               654,962
<CGS>                                          427,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,190,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               797,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,545,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,545,476
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,545,476
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.28)


</TABLE>
# C_2017098EN.01000102.xml

| 29.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8342 — Mitsubishi Chemical Group/PTT Public Company Group/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 98/02)

On 23 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8342. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8342. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### (A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Talmadge Gordon Henderson, Appellant. (B) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Richard Gray, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

[In each action] Time to perfect appeals extended 90 days.
3025.7001 Definitions. As used in this subpart— ( a ) “Commercial,” as applied to an item described in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-1, means an item of supply, whether an end product or component, that meets the definition of “commercial item” set forth in (FAR) 48 CFR 2.101.
( b ) “Component” means any item supplied to the Government as part of an end product or of another component.
( c ) “End product” means supplies delivered under a line item of a contract.
( d ) “Non-commercial,” as applied to an item described in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-1, means an item of supply, whether an end product or component, that does not meet the definition of “commercial item” set forth in (FAR) 48 CFR 2.101.
( e ) “Item directly related to national security interests” means an item intended for use in a Department of Homeland Security action protecting the nation from internal or external threats, including protecting the nation's borders, transportation system, maritime domain or critical infrastructure, as determined by the contracting officer.
EXHIBIT 32.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Roger H. Ballou                                 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Roger H. Ballou                                     
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|Dated: May 7, 2007 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|                   |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark A. Kerschner                               
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Mark A. Kerschner                                   
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Dated: May 7, 2007 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will
be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of eClickMD, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neil Burley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the
18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (SS) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/ NEIL BURLEY
-----------------------------

Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000714560
<NAME> US AIRWAYS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             720
<SECURITIES>                                       721
<RECEIVABLES>                                      607<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,760
<PP&E>                                           5,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,975<F3>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,379<F3>
<BONDS>                                          1,970
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         721<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,975<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,469
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    745
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                445
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
<F2>EPS calculations are not relevant because US Airways, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc.
<F3>This amount was restated to conform with current classifications.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>