alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020281EN.01000101.xml

| 26.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 August 2020

(2020/C 281/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1814 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89945 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3525 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0752 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 163,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5688 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,121 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 353,46 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3919 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8403 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,7352 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6472 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5597 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1563 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8082 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6170 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 402,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,8084 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1671 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5290 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 301,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9247 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,357 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 88,3600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,185 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,5860 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,8774 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,7165 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1814

JPY

Japanese yen

125,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89945

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3525

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0752

ISK

Iceland króna

163,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5688

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,121

HUF

Hungarian forint

353,46

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3919

RON

Romanian leu

4,8403

TRY

Turkish lira

8,7352

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6472

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5597

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1563

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8082

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6170

KRW

South Korean won

1 402,12

ZAR

South African rand

19,8084

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1671

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5290

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 301,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9247

PHP

Philippine peso

57,357

RUB

Russian rouble

88,3600

THB

Thai baht

37,185

BRL

Brazilian real

6,5860

MXN

Mexican peso

25,8774

INR

Indian rupee

87,7165

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### Santina Tripi, Appellant, v. Elaine Stillwell, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The nonsuit was granted after defendant had rested without offering any evidence. The plaintiff was “entitled to the benefit of every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn” from the evidence submitted by her *(Sagorsky*v. *Maly on,*307 N. Y. 584, 586; *Michaels*v. *Gannett Go.,*10 A D 2d 417). Applying this principle the plaintiff established a prima facie ease which required submission to the jury. Furthermore, plaintiff’s motion to reopen and present additional proof, made as it was immediately after her counsel had informed the court that he rested and before any offer of proof by defendant, should have been granted. There was no showing of any prejudice to defendant and, therefore, the denial of this motion was an improvident exercise of the court’s discretion. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term dismissing the complaint on the merits in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from order denying motion to reopen ease, etc., and for a new trial.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2879-012]

On January 25, 2021, the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (Vermont DEC) notified the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) that Green Mountain Power Corporation submitted an application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification to Vermont DEC on January 22, 2021, in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6, we hereby notify the Vermont DEC of the following:

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     January 22, 2021.                

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:*                     One year.                

*Date Waiver Occurs for Failure to Act:*                     January 22, 2022.                

If Vermont DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request by the above waiver date, then the agency's certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: January 26, 2021.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-02061 Filed 1-29-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
  (1)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: July 25, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ JOEL P. MOSKOWITZ

Joel P. MoskowitzChief Executive Officer
First Department,

July, 1964

(July 2, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Bertram A. Powers, as President of New York Typographical Union No. 6, Respondent, v. W. J. Poch, as Treasurer of the Publishers Association of New York City, Appellant.

Order and judgment entered March 19, 1964 granting petitioner’s petition and staying arbitration between the parties, and denying respondent’s cross petition to compel arbitration, unanimously reversed on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs to respondent-appellant. The petition of petitioner-respondent is denied and the cross petition of respondent-appellant is granted, with $10 costs. Respondent, an unincorporated association, acts as agent for its newspaper members in the negotiation and administration of collective bargaining agreements with the union, representing employees of the member newspapers. Petitioner is the bargaining representative of the employees working in the composing rooms of the newspapers. Petitioner and respondent entered into a collective bargaining agrément which provided for wages and terms and conditions of employment, including a program for training teletypesetter operators in the composing rooms. On July 29, 1963, the composing room foreman of the *New York Times,*a signatory to the agreement, -by written notice ordered petitioner’s shop steward “to supply three qualified teletypesetter operators irrespective of priority.” The steward refused to comply with the order and respondent filed a grievance pursuant to the grievance procedure set forth in the contract. On December 20, 1963 after negotiations under the grievance procedure broke down, respondent informed petitioner that respondent would seek arbitration. On January 3, 1964, petitioner wrote the American Arbitration Association and informed them that they would not arbitrate since “ there is no arbitrable controversy between the parties.” The contract involved herein contained a broad arbitration clause which mandates that any controversy arising thereunder be arbitrated. The dispute here pertains to a matter covered by the contract and an .arbitrable controversy does exist between the parties *(Matter of Potoker [Brooklyn Eagle],*286 App. Div. 733, affd. 2 N Y 2d 553). Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.
#### 32.801 Definitions.

*Designated agency,* as used in this subpart, means any department or agency of the executive branch of the United States Government (see 32.803(d)).

*No-setoff commitment,* as used in this subpart, means a contractual undertaking that, to the extent permitted by the Act, payments by the designated agency to the assignee under an assignment of claims will not be reduced to liquidate the indebtedness of the contractor to the Government.

[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 49730, Sept. 26, 1995; 66 FR 2132, Jan. 10, 2001]
#### Bernard J. Brown and Maurice Alschuler, copartners, trading as Brown & Alschuler, appellees, v. Jacob Handelsman, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,537.

Action to recover compensation for legal services. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George B. Holmes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 23, 1926.

Pennish & Rashbaum, for appellant.

Brown & Alschuler, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert R. Steinhauer, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated February 11, 1963, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of that court, rendered May 29, 1946 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of robbery in the third degree and sentencing him as a second felony offender to serve a term of 10 to 20 years. Order affirmed. Defendant’s application is based upon the fact that on his preliminary arraignment in the District Court of Nassau County he was not advised of his right to counsel and that counsel was not assigned until sometime after he was arraigned in the County Court, following his indictment by the Grand Jury. Arraigned on that indictment in the County Court, the court directed the entry of a plea of not guilty for defendant and subsequently *838assigned counsel to him. Under the circumstances -presented, any defects in the proceedings at the preliminary hearing in the District Court were immaterial; such defects did not affect the validity of the indictment found thereafter and the proceedings following the indictment (cf. *People ex rel. Hirsehberg*V. *Glose,*11? Y 2d 258; *People*v. *Wolochen,*15 A D 2d 538). Defendant’s rights were not violated merely because, upon his arraignment on the indictment, a plea of not guilty was then entered without the benefit of counsel *(People*v. *Combs,*19 A D 2d 639). Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur,
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 527
LT Case No. 2021

- 30846

- FMCI

_____________________________

T HOMAS Y. K ANI

,

Appellant,

v.

R AYAUNA F EASTER

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

. Stasia Warren , Judge

.

Christopher V. Butler , of Butler Legal, P.A.

, Sanford , for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

October 6, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.

Thomas Y. Kani appeals the trial court’s final judgment of paternity rendered after trial. He raises two grounds for reversal.
Kani asserts that under Perlow v. Ber g

- Perlow , 875 So. 2d 383 (Fla.

2004 ), a nd its progeny, the trial court erred in adopting, verbatim, Appellee’s proposed final judgment. The record, however, reflects that the final judgment entered by the trial court included its own changes, additions, and deletions to Appellee’s proposed final2 judgment and was entered some ten days after Kan i had received the proposed judgment and thus had the ability to notify the trial court of any objections. Accordingly, we affirm on this issue. 1

On Kani’s remaining ground for relief, we affirm on the authority of Hester v. Hester , 705 So. 2d 721, 72 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (“In the absence of a record of the final hearing on November 20, 1996, there is no basis to reverse the appealed judgment on evidentiary grounds. The child support guidelines worksheet attached to the judgment has sufficient informa tion to allow review of the guidelines calculation, and we find no error.”).

A FFIRMED

.

L AMBERT

, H ARRIS

, and P RATT

, JJ., concur

.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________

1 Kani had also submitted to the trial court his own proposed final judgment for consideration.
#### Rosa L. Dillard, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 9, 1978, denying plaintiff’s motion pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law to amend notice of claim and complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to grant the motion to amend, without costs or disbursements. The plaintiif contends that while walking on Lenox Avenue at 135th Street in Manhattan, she was struck by a sign which fell from a nearby premises. A timely notice of claim was filed stating that the object that fell came from 505 Lenox Avenue. Within three months thereafter, a hearing was conducted by the office of the Comptroller of the City of New York, at which it was made clear that the plaintiff was walking on 135th Street. 505 Lenox Avenue does not front on 135th Street, but 503 Lenox Avenue does. The plaintiff therefore argues that the defendant was in possession of information with respect to the correct location if not the correct address. Some three months later, the Borough Superintendent of Manhattan for the Department of Buildings forwarded to the Comptroller a report that the premises at 505 Lenox Avenue had been inspected, and there was no evidence of anything falling, nor were there any pending violations in the records of the Department of Buildings. Some 16 months *879after the accident, plaintiff sought to amend her notice of claim to specify that it was 503 Lenox Avenue and not 505 Lenox Avenue. The motion was denied on the ground that it was "not sufficiently shown that the error and passage of time have not worked to the defendant’s prejudice.” We deem the address, in the context of this situation, an immaterial variation, and it has not been shown that the failure to be exact has prejudiced the city. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Sandler, Lane and Silverman, JJ.
# C_2020450EN.01000901.xml

| 28.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 450/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 450/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

23 December 2020

(2020/C 450/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2166 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4380 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90700 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1213 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0837 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 155,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,6238 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,372 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 362,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5025 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8710 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,2946 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6118 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5671 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4321 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7208 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6235 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 347,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7895 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9549 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5440 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 351,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9437 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,453 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 91,6360 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,772 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2867 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,4449 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,7945 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2166

JPY

Japanese yen

125,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4380

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90700

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1213

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0837

ISK

Iceland króna

155,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,6238

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,372

HUF

Hungarian forint

362,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5025

RON

Romanian leu

4,8710

TRY

Turkish lira

9,2946

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6118

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5671

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4321

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7208

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6235

KRW

South Korean won

1 347,45

ZAR

South African rand

17,7895

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9549

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5440

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 351,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9437

PHP

Philippine peso

58,453

RUB

Russian rouble

91,6360

THB

Thai baht

36,772

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2867

MXN

Mexican peso

24,4449

INR

Indian rupee

89,7945

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit
      31.16








RULE
      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION


OF
      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF AMEREN CORPORATION


(required
      by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I,
      Warner
      L. Baxter, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September
      30,
      2005 of Ameren Corporation; and





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report.










Date:
      February 12, 2007









/s/
      Warner L.
      Baxter


Warner
      L.
      Baxter


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q -
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                       126
<INVENTORY>                                      8,281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,393
<PP&E>                                          24,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,159
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,425
<SALES>                                          6,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,621
<CGS>                                            5,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    293
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019106EN.01001101.xml

| 20.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 March 2019

(2019/C 106/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1358 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4624 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85548 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4485 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1353 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 132,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,604 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,22 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2879 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7585 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,2191 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5986 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5060 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9161 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6535 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5342 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 283,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,3726 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6237 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4168 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 099,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6232 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,029 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,1062 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,982 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2878 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5793 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,3510 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1358

JPY

Japanese yen

126,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4624

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85548

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4485

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1353

ISK

Iceland króna

132,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,604

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,22

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2879

RON

Romanian leu

4,7585

TRY

Turkish lira

6,2191

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5986

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5060

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9161

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6535

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5342

KRW

South Korean won

1 283,15

ZAR

South African rand

16,3726

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6237

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4168

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 099,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6232

PHP

Philippine peso

60,029

RUB

Russian rouble

73,1062

THB

Thai baht

35,982

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2878

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5793

INR

Indian rupee

78,3510

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135432 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135432 COA: 272941 Emmet CC: 05-002530 DENNIS JOHN BEER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

0211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 19, 2008

Clerk