alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         9,540
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               8,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    14,545
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         17,960
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           17,731
<LOANS>                                        118,325
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,874
<DEPOSITS>                                     155,781
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,543
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,167
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 171,874
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5,203
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,068
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               184
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,455
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,557
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,898
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,243
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,243
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.89
<LOANS-NON>                                    647
<LOANS-PAST>                                   14
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                441
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,311
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  20
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,351
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,351
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        819



</TABLE>
# C_2019038EN.01000301.xml

| 31.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

30 January 2019

(2019/C 38/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1429 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4648 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87341 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3843 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1403 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6938 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,802 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 316,53 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2905 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7551 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,0288 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5885 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5111 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9662 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6723 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5441 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 277,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5484 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6767 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4235 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 149,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6925 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,774 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,3615 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,864 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2392 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8249 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,3510 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1429

JPY

Japanese yen

125,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4648

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87341

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3843

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1403

ISK

Iceland króna

137,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6938

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,802

HUF

Hungarian forint

316,53

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2905

RON

Romanian leu

4,7551

TRY

Turkish lira

6,0288

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5885

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5111

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9662

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6723

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5441

KRW

South Korean won

1 277,98

ZAR

South African rand

15,5484

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6767

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4235

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 149,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6925

PHP

Philippine peso

59,774

RUB

Russian rouble

75,3615

THB

Thai baht

35,864

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2392

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8249

INR

Indian rupee

81,3510

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 131 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model 

Years 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2024 

Mr. CLYDE (for himself, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. HUNT, Mr. OGLES, Mr. JACKSON

of Texas, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. DONALDS, 

Ms. TENNEY, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. GUEST, Mr. 

MANN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. OBERNOLTE, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. 

GROTHMAN, Mr. GOODEN of Texas, Ms. BOEBERT, Mr. BURLISON, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Mr. ESTES, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. MORAN, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. MCCORMICK, Mr. ROY, Mr. CRANE, and Mr. LOUDERMILK) 

submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘MultiPollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 

and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Multi-PollutVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:21 Apr 26, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ131.IH HJ131

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 131 IH 

1 ant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later 

2 Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 

3 27842 (April 18, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force 

4 or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Gee, Appellant, v. Transit Authority et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Hamm, J.

Appeal by the appellant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board disallowing a claim for disability benefits and disallowing a claim for compensation death benefits. As to the disability claim the Referee found causal relationship but disallowed the claim as not filed within the statutory period. The board reversed the Referee’s findings and disallowed the claim stating that “ the record presents no probative evidence that the *944decedent did, in fact, sustain an umbilical hernia ”. On March 28, 1946, the decedent while employed as a motorman by the New York City Transit Authority jumped or fell from a train to the track and felt a stitch in his lower abdomen. He lost no time from work and on April 25, 1946, he was seen by a doctor who reported that his examination disclosed no evidence of injury or hernia. The decedent did not file any claim for compensation and no claim was filed until after his death on March 10, 1959. On January 29, 1947, he was again seen in a periodic examination by the employer’s physician who found that there was no hernia and that the decedent was physically fit to work. More than two years after the incident and on June 26, 1948, a physician whom the decedent consulted for a general examination found an umbilical hernia. He testified that the incident of March 28, 1946, which the decedent described, was a competent producing cause of the umbilical hernia which he found. On the other hand a physician called by the Special Fund testified that, in the light of the history of no hernia being found on physical examination in 1946 and again in 1947, the accident was not responsible for the hernia. As the board’s determination of absence of causal relationship was supported by substantial evidence it was not required to accept the theory advanced by the appellant’s medical witness *(Matter of Teamer*v. *American Radiator & Std. Sanitary Co.,*20 A D 2d 739; *Matter of Roettinger*v. *Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.,*17 A D 2d 76, affd. 13 N Y 2d 1102). As to the death claim the board reversed the Referee’s decision on this and on another ground which does not require discussion. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
Order entered April 8, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01101-CR

No. 05-19-01102-CR

No. 05-20-00256-CR

No. 05-20-00260-CR

GARY WAYNE BARNES SR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F81-01105-J, F81-01027-J,

F81-02518-J & F80-16530-J

ORDER

In light of the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY all outstanding

motions in these appeals as moot.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2 CENTEX CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Catherine R. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ CATHERINE R. SMITHCatherine R. SmithChief Financial Officer
Date: August 5, 2008
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagle’s, Inc. for the period ended June 28,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Form 10-Q”), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagle’s,Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

1. The Form 10-Q fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934, and 

 

2. The information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 12, 2008

 

By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle 

J. Douglas Cagle 

Chief Executive Officer 

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagle’s, Inc. for the period ended June 28,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Form 10-Q”), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagle’s, Inc.,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

1. The Form 10-Q fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934, and 

 

2. The information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 12, 2008

 

By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV 

Mark M. Ham IV 

Chief Financial Officer
36.202 Specifications. ( a ) Construction specifications shall conform to the requirements in part 11 of this regulation.
( b ) Whenever possible, contracting officers shall ensure that references in specifications are to widely recognized standards or specifications promulgated by governments, industries, or technical societies.
( c ) When *brand name or equal* descriptions are necessary, specifications must clearly identify and describe the particular physical, functional, or other characteristics of the brand-name items which are considered essential to satisfying the requirement.
[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 48249, Sept. 18, 1995; 66 FR 27415, May 16, 2001; 74 FR 34207, July 14, 2009]
Fourth Department

(May 16, 1963)

#### In the Matter of the Intermediate Accounting of James W. Bassette, as Administrator of the Estate of Leslie A. Cronk, Deceased.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed. Memorandum: On January 10, 1963 we made an order dismissing this appeal unless records and appellant’s briefs were filed and served on or before March 15, 1963. Subsequently we granted appellant’s application to present the appeal upon one typewritten copy of the record. The papers before us show that appellant and his counsel have made no real effort to comply with our order of last January. While the appeal was taken in August, 1962 it was not until shortly before March 15, 1963 —■ a few days before the deadline for filing record and briefs — that appellant first took steps in Surrogate’s Court to settle the record. We recognize that there may have been difficulties in completing such record but appellant and his attorney have failed to show any sustained effort to comply with the prior order of this court. To the contrary they have shown an almost insolent disregard thereof.
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 50276 DATE 9/19/2012

CASE

TITLE

Frederick Lee Walker (B-34246) vs. Salvador Godinez

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff Frederick Lee Walker’s second motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis [9] is denied and the instant action is hereby ordered dismissed. Civil case terminated. 

O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Frederick Lee Walker’s (Walker) second motion for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis. On July 31, 2012, the court denied Walker’s first motion for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis because Walker had failed to provide the court with a certified copy of his prison trust

account statement, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The court gave Walker until September 7, 2012 to

either pay the filing fee or file an accurately and properly completed in forma pauperis application form with

the required certified copy of his prison trust account statement. The court also warned Walker that if he

failed to pay the filing fee or to file an accurately and properly completed in forma pauperis application form

with the required certified copy of his prison trust account statement by September 7, 2012, the instant action

would be dismissed. 

On August 31, 2012, Walker submitted the instant motion. However, in his complaint, Walker failed

to disclose at least one prior lawsuit that he brought in the Northern District of Illinois, case number 08 C

3466. The form Walker used to draft his complaint specifically warned Walker that failure to accurately

complete the section relating to litigation history could result in dismissal of the action. In addition, case

number 08 C 3466 resulted in a “strike” against Walker for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Based on

12C50276 Frederick Lee Walker (B-34246) vs. Salvador Godinez Page 1 of 2
STATEMENT

such facts, the court finds that Walker committed fraud by failing to disclose case number 08 C 3466 in his

complaint, which was a material and false omission, and it 12 C 50276warrants immediate dismissal of the

instant action. See Hoskins v. Dart, 633 F.3d 541, 543 (7th Cir. 2011)(indicating that dismissal with

prejudice is an appropriate sanction where a plaintiff is warned that failure to provide an accurate litigation

history may result in dismissal and where the district court finds that a plaintiff committed fraud by making a

material and false omission). Therefore, the instant action is dismissed and the instant motion is denied as

moot. 

12C50276 Frederick Lee Walker (B-34246) vs. Salvador Godinez Page 2 of 2
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 147 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration relating to ‘‘Worker Walkaround Representative 

Designation Process’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2024 

Mrs. MILLER of Illinois (for herself, Ms. FOXX, Mr. CLYDE, Mr. SMITH of 

Nebraska, Mr. OGLES, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. 

MOOLENAAR, Mr. MANN, Mr. BEAN of Florida, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. 

ALLEN, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. DUARTE, Ms. LETLOW, Mr. 

WALBERG, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. BURLISON, Mr. SMUCKER, 

Mr. BABIN, Mrs. HOUCHIN, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Ms. BOEBERT, 

and Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Occupational Safety and Health Administration relating to ‘‘Worker Walkaround Representative Designation 

Process’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Oc4 cupational Safety and Health Administration relating to 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 147 IH 

1 ‘‘Worker Walkaround Representative Designation Proc2 ess’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 22558 (April 1, 2024)), and such rule 

3 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
An Official Web Site of the United States Government



## 1:250,000-scale Hydrologic Units of the United States DATASET SUMMARY Source: U.S. Geological Survey Category: Inland Water Resources Date Released: 1994 Date Updated: 1994 (Here you put information defining how the time period of content information, on the DOC file, was determined) Time Period: (Here you pick one of the following entries that describes how often changes or additions are made to the data set. Pick one, and delete the rest) Continually Daily Weekly Monthly Annually Unknown As Needed Irregular None planned Frequency: 1994 (Here you put information defining how the time period of content information, on the DOC file, was determined) Description: Abstract: The Geographic Information Retrieval and Analysis System (GIRAS) was developed in the mid 70s to put into digital form a number of data layers which were of interest to the USGS. One of these data layers was the Hydrologic Units. The map is based on the Hydrologic Unit Maps published by the U.S. Geological Survey Office of Water Data Coordination, together with the list descriptions and name of region, subregion, accounting units, and cataloging unit. The hydrologic units are encoded with an eight- digit number that indicates the hydrologic region (first two di (more)

DATASET RATINGS

Current Your Rating [?] Overall (0 votes) Data Utility (0 votes) Usefulness (0 votes) Ease of Access (0 votes) Comment (optional) HOME DATA TOOLS COMMUNITY METRICS OPEN DATA SITES GALLERY WHAT'S NEW 

### Page 1 of 3 1:250,000

-scale Hydrologic Units of the United States

3/7/2011 http://www.data.gov/geodata/g601874DATASET METRICS

Number of Downloads: 242

DATASET INFORMATION Data.gov Data Category Type Geospatial Catalog Specialized Data Category Designation Geospatial Keywords None, hydrologic unit, watersheds, inlandWaters, None, Conterminous United States, None, None, None, None Unique ID E7DC265F-D5AF-C09F-4E68-A96A5458EE80

CONTRIBUTING AGENCY INFORMATION Citation Title: 1:250,000-scale Hydrologic Units of the United States Originator: Steeves, Peter and Douglas Nebert Date/Time: 1994 (more)

DATASET COVERAGE Geographic Coverage Bounding Coordinates: -127.90613546, -65.32190735, 48.28250713, 22.8757219

DATASET DESCRIPTION Data Dictionary/Variable List Description: Type Label: HUC250.NAR Definition: Description: Type Label: HUC250.AAT Definition: Description: Type Label: HUC250.LEFTRIGHT Definition: Overview: For definition of drainage basins, there are two principal tabular data elements of interest. The first, "HUC", stand (more) (Privacy Policy) 

### Page 2 of 3 1:250,000

-scale Hydrologic Units of the United States

3/7/2011 http://www.data.gov/geodata/g601874ADDITIONAL DATASET DOCUMENTATION

Additional Metadata XML format (click here) HTML format (click here) FGDC Compliance (Geospatial Only) Y

About | FAQ | Contact Info | Data Policy | Accessibility | Privacy Policy 

### Page 3 of 3 1:250,000

-scale Hydrologic Units of the United States

3/7/2011 http://www.data.gov/geodata/g601874
Exhibit 32.2

                              COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                            (Chief Financial Officer)

In connection with the Annual Report of Community Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Donald F. Holt,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community  Banks,  Inc.,  and will be retained by  Community  Banks,
Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/  Donald F. Holt
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2004
#### LENNAN, Respondent, v. HAMBURG AMERICAN S. S. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Action by Mary W. Len-nan, as executrix, etc., against the Hamburg American Steamship Company.

No opinion. Motion granted.