alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 3052.209-72 Organizational conflict of interest.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.507-1, insert the following clause:

# Organizational Conflict of Interest (JUN 2006)

(a) Determination. The Government has determined that this effort may result in an actual or potential conflict of interest, or may provide one or more offerors with the potential to attain an unfair competitive advantage. The nature of the conflict of interest and the limitation on future contracting ___[”contracting officer shall insert description here”].___

(b) If any such conflict of interest is found to exist, the Contracting Officer may (1) disqualify the offeror, or (2) determine that it is otherwise in the best interest of the United States to contract with the offeror and include the appropriate provisions to avoid, neutralize, mitigate, or waive such conflict in the contract awarded. After discussion with the offeror, the Contracting Officer may determine that the actual conflict cannot be avoided, neutralized, mitigated or otherwise resolved to the satisfaction of the Government, and the offeror may be found ineligible for award.

(c) Disclosure: The offeror hereby represents, to the best of its knowledge that:

_(1) It is not aware of any facts which create any actual or potential organizational conflicts of interest relating to the award of this contract, or

_(2) It has included information in its proposal, providing all current information bearing on the existence of any actual or potential organizational conflicts of interest, and has included a mitigation plan in accordance with paragraph (d) of this clause.

(d) Mitigation. If an offeror with a potential or actual conflict of interest or unfair competitive advantage believes the conflict can be avoided, neutralized, or mitigated, the offeror shall submit a mitigation plan to the Government for review. Award of a contract where an actual or potential conflict of interest exists shall not occur before Government approval of the mitigation plan. If a mitigation plan is approved, the restrictions of this clause do not apply to the extent defined in the mitigation plan.

(e) Other Relevant Information: In addition to the mitigation plan, the Contracting Officer may require further relevant information from the offeror. The Contracting Officer will use all information submitted by the offeror, and any other relevant information known to DHS, to determine whether an award to the offeror may take place, and whether the mitigation plan adequately neutralizes or mitigates the conflict.

(f) Corporation Change. The successful offeror shall inform the Contracting Officer within thirty (30) calendar days of the effective date of any corporate mergers, acquisitions, and/or divestures that may affect this clause.

(g) Flow-down. The contractor shall insert the substance of this clause in each first tier subcontract that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold.

(End of clause)

[71 FR 25774, May 2, 2006, as amended at 86 FR 17317, Apr. 2, 2021]
#### Nelson Briant, Respondent, *v.*Charles J. Holbrook, Appellant.

(Argued June 19, 1883;

decided June 26, 1883.)

*P. C. Williams*for motion.

*F. N. Fitch*opposed.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
1

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Administrative Index for

NPRM action EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0213

Revision to the Hawaii Implementation Plan, 

Minor New Source Review Program

Docket Index 

Category/ Item Number

I. SIP Submittal Documents

 SIP Submittal Cover Letter, from HDOH, dated December 14, 2011 I-A

 SIP Revision Description, from HDOH, December, 2011 I-B

 Rules Submitted for SIP Revision, Adopted November 14, 2003 I-C

II. Federal Register Notices

 48 FR 37402, August 18, 1983 II-A

III. Other Relevant Documents

 Technical Support Document (TSD) for Hawaii Minor NSR Rule III-A

 Rules Being Removed from the Hawaii SIP III-B

 Letter from HDOH to EPA Region 9 dated March 13, 2012, Re: Adequacy 

of Minor Source Review

III-C

 Letter from HDOH to EPA Region 9, dated March 13, 2012, Re: Public 

Noticing and Permit Modification Procedures

III-D

 HI SIP Revision Cited in TSD III-E

Notes:

1. All documents, unless otherwise noted, are available on internet at Regulations.gov under Docket 

# EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0213.

2. Copies of the listed documents are located at EPA Region 9 offices.

3. HDOH’s current SIP can be downloaded from: 

http://yosemite.epa.gov/R9/r9sips.nsf/Agency?readform&count=500&state=Hawaii&cat=Hawai

i+DOH-Agency-Wide+Provisions

4. HDOH’s current and proposed regulations can be downloaded from: 

http://gen.doh.hawaii.gov/sites/har/admrules/default.aspx
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

 

I,            Marvin F. Romanow, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nexen Inc.,            a Canadian Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.            Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,            that:

 
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the                        quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and                        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully                        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                        Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in                        all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                        the Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| Date: May 1, 2008 |   |   | /s/ Marvin F. Romanow                                                    |
|-------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   |   | Marvin F. Romanow

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A            signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to            Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the Securities and            Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Donald J. DOCKERY, Appellant, v. Timothy P. BURNS; Scott C. Sladek; John J. Jedlicka; William H. Ouren; Omaha Public Defender’s Office, Appellees.

No. 07-1228.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 23, 2007.

Filed: Nov. 7, 2007.

Donald J. Dockery, Omaha, NE, pro se.

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Donald Dockery appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, *see Moore v. Sims,*200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam), we conclude that dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraslca.
432.003 Simplified acquisition procedures financing. ( a ) The chief of the contracting office may approve contract financing on a contract to be entered under the simplified acquisition procedures. Class approvals may not be made.
( b ) The signed approval must contain the supporting rationale for the action and an estimate of the cost and/or risk to the government.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 5D 2 2

- 2566 LT Case No. 2019

- 304931

- CFDB

_____________________________

J ASON H ERNANDEZ ,
Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

. Leah R. Case, Judge

.

A ndrea Flynn Mogensen, of Law Office of Andrea Flynn Mogensen, PA , Sarasota, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

October 10, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

W ALLIS , J AY , and E ISNAUG L E , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
## ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT

Recipients of multi-year discretionary awards are required to submit an Annual Performance Report (APR) annually; the collection number is OMB 1840-0766. The annual report provides data on the status of the funded project that corresponds to the scope and objectives established in the approved application and any approved amendments. Under EDGAR §75.118, the report must provide the most current performance and financial information (including cost-share data, if applicable). ED program staff will analyze each report to ensure that the grantee has made substantial progress toward reaching the objectives included in the grantee’s approved application.

Annual Performance Reports are typically due 90 days after the performance period ends; however, grantees will be notified by their ED program officer if the submission deadline changes.

**Note:** If you are a project director and have responsibility for completing the annual report for your institution, please be sure you are designated on the official grant award notification and your e-mail and telephone number are listed correctly in the G5 database.

## FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT

All recipients, in accordance with EDGAR §75.590, are required to submit a final performance report. ED Program Staff will review the final performance report and determine whether the grantee achieved the scope and objectives of the grant. The program staff will also determine if all applicable administrative actions and financial obligations have been completed by grantee.

Final Performance Reports are typically due 90 days after the performance period ends (September 30th); however, grantees will be notified by their ED program officer if the submission deadline changes.

Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 06/02/2011
|-------------------------
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 352 

Designating the week of December 3 through December 9, 2017, as ‘‘National 

Nurse-Managed Health Clinic Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of December 3 through December 9, 

2017, as ‘‘National Nurse-Managed Health Clinic Week’’. 

Whereas nurse-managed health clinics are nonprofit, community-based health care sites that offer primary care and 

wellness services based on the nursing model; 

Whereas the nursing model emphasizes the protection, promotion, and optimization of health, the prevention of illness, the alleviation of suffering, and the diagnosis and 

treatment of illness; 

Whereas an advanced practice nurse leads each nurse-managed health clinic, and an interdisciplinary team of highly 

qualified health care professionals staffs each nurse-managed health clinic; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 352 ATS 

Whereas nurse-managed health clinics offer a broad scope of 

services, including treatment for acute and chronic illnesses, routine physical exams, immunizations for adults 

and children, disease screenings, health education, prenatal care, dental care, and drug and alcohol treatment; 

Whereas, as of September 2017, approximately 500 nursemanaged health clinics provided care across the United 

States and recorded more than 2,500,000 patient encounters annually; 

Whereas nurse-managed health clinics strengthen the health 

care safety net by expanding access to primary care and 

chronic disease management services for vulnerable and 

medically underserved populations in diverse rural, 

urban, and suburban communities; 

Whereas research has shown that nurse-managed health clinics experience high patient retention and patient satisfaction rates, and nurse-managed health clinic patients, 

compared to patients of other similar safety net providers, experience higher rates of generic medication fills 

and lower hospitalization rates; 

Whereas the 2013 Health Affairs article ‘‘Nurse-Managed 

Health Centers and Patient-Homes Could Mitigate Expected Primary Care Physician Shortage’’ highlights the 

ability of nurse-managed health clinics to bring high 

quality care to individuals who may not otherwise receive 

needed services; and 

Whereas nurse-managed health clinics offering both primary 

care and wellness services provide quality care in a costeffective manner: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 352 ATS 

1 (1) designates the week of December 3 through 

2 December 9, 2017, as ‘‘National Nurse-Managed 

3 Health Clinic Week’’; 

4 (2) supports the ideals and goals of National 

5 Nurse-Managed Health Clinic Week; and 

6 (3) encourages the expansion of nurse-managed 

7 health clinics so that nurse-managed health clinics 

8 may continue to serve as health care workforce de9 velopment sites for the next generation of primary 

10 care providers. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certifications**
I, Leldon E. Echols, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Centex Corporation;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 10, 2003   /s/ LELDON E. ECHOLSLeldon E. Echols  Chief Financial Officer
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

**Who May Apply: (specifically)** An application for designation as a state licensing agency may only be submitted by the state vocational rehabilitation (VR) agency providing VR services to the blind under an approved state plan for VR services under 34 CFR 361.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### W. C. Handley, appellant, v. Herman C. Peters and Anna E. Peters, appellees.

Gen. No. 30,573.

Action upon promissory note. Judgment for defendants. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John F. Haas, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed with findings of fact and judgment here.

Opinion filed May 25, 1926.

Huttall & Chism, for appellant.

Helmer, Moulton, Whitman *&*Holton, for appellees; Arthur E. Boroughf, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
Order entered December 10 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01514
- CV
IN RE LAKEITH AMIR
- SHARIF, Relator Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 09
- 13818
- E 

### O RDER Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. In view of the volume of motions filed by relator, the number of judges who have presided over the case and the recent assignment of this case to respondent , the Court request s that real parties in interest Quik Trip Corporation and Chester Cadieux III file a response to the petition, including any necessary supplemental record, addressing : 1) the actions the trial court has taken to ascertain which motions filed by relator, if any, require a ruling and 2) the actions the trial court has taken, if any, to dispose of any motio ns that relator has properly set for hearing or other appropriate disposition

. Real parties in interest shall file their response s on or before December 29 , 2014.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
#### 3452.228-70 Required insurance.

As prescribed in 3428.311-2, insert the following clause in all solicitations and resultant cost-reimbursement contracts:

# Required Insurance (MAR 2011)

(a) The contractor shall procure and maintain such insurance as required by law or regulation, including but not limited to the requirements of FAR subpart 28.3. Prior written approval of the contracting officer shall be required with respect to any insurance policy, the premiums for which the contractor proposes to treat as a direct cost under this contract, and with respect to any proposed qualified program of self-insurance. The terms of any other insurance policy shall be submitted to the contracting officer for approval upon request.

(b) Unless otherwise authorized in writing by the contracting officer, the contractor shall not procure or maintain for its own protection any insurance covering loss or destruction of, or damage to, Government property.

(End of clause)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Opportunity: Validate LGBTQ+ Supportive Practices      

# Opportunity: Validate LGBTQ+ Supportive Practices

The Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE) is seeking school-based health center (SBHC) providers to help validate a checklist of LGBTQ+ supportive practices. This work is part of an HHS-funded study on enhancing services and supports for LGBTQ+ high school students who access SBHCs. **Learn more.**
# C_2020036EN.01000101.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2020/C 36/01)

Last publication

OJ C 27, 27.1.2020

Past publications

OJ C 19, 20.1.2020

OJ C 10, 13.1.2020

OJ C 432, 23.12.2019

OJ C 423, 16.12.2019

OJ C 413, 9.12.2019

OJ C 406, 2.12.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---