alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Bryan D. Gross, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB as amended of MPSISystems Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared; b) intentionally left blank; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function)
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 10, 2004                   /s/ Bryan D. Gross   Bryan D. Gross   Chief Executive Officer
');
	document.write('

**Program Office:** Institutional  Service

**CFDA Number:** 84.937**Program Type:** Noncompetitive grant**Also Known As:** Olympic Scholarships Program

This program provides financial assistance to athletes who are training at the U.S. Olympic Education Center or one of the U.S. Olympic training centers and who are pursuing a postsecondary education at institutions of higher education (IHEs).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 94 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.94
                                         Agreed to March 8, 2024        

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 4366, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following correction:
     Amend the title so as to read: ``Making consolidated 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for 
other purposes.''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
# C_2019362EN.01000201.xml

| 28.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 October 2019

(2019/C 362/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1107 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4704 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86598 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7445 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1019 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1865 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,568 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 328,87 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2777 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7553 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,4012 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6270 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4511 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7048 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7456 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5140 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 304,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2387 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8524 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4530 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 588,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6494 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,951 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,8240 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,504 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4732 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2020 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,7515 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1107

JPY

Japanese yen

120,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4704

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86598

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7445

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1019

ISK

Iceland króna

138,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1865

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,568

HUF

Hungarian forint

328,87

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2777

RON

Romanian leu

4,7553

TRY

Turkish lira

6,4012

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6270

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4511

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7048

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7456

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5140

KRW

South Korean won

1 304,87

ZAR

South African rand

16,2387

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8524

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4530

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 588,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6494

PHP

Philippine peso

56,951

RUB

Russian rouble

70,8240

THB

Thai baht

33,504

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4732

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2020

INR

Indian rupee

78,7515

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 215.407 Special cost or pricing areas.
**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer **

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | **•** |   | fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **•** |   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |  /s/                Robert A. Placek |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   | **Name:** | **Robert                A. Placek** |   |
|   |   |   |   | **Title:** | **Chairman                of the Board, President and Chief Executive Office (Principal Executive                Officer)** |   |
|   |   |   |   | **Date:** | **January                10, 2006** |   |

----
#### BLOOMGARDEN, Appellant, v. HOFFMAN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appel lant Division, Second Department.

March 2 1906.)

Action by Henry Bloomgarden againsi Ernst Hoffman and Alma Hoffman.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, witl costs.

MILLER, J.,

dissents.
# C_2020001EN.01000201.xml

| 3.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

31 December 2019

(2020/C 1/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1234 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4715 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85080 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4468 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0854 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 135,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8638 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,408 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 330,53 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2568 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7830 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,6843 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5995 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4598 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7473 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6653 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5111 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 296,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7773 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8205 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4395 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 595,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5953 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,900 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,9563 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,415 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5157 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2202 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,1870 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1234

JPY

Japanese yen

121,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4715

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85080

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4468

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0854

ISK

Iceland króna

135,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8638

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,408

HUF

Hungarian forint

330,53

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2568

RON

Romanian leu

4,7830

TRY

Turkish lira

6,6843

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5995

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4598

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7473

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6653

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5111

KRW

South Korean won

1 296,28

ZAR

South African rand

15,7773

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8205

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4395

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 595,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5953

PHP

Philippine peso

56,900

RUB

Russian rouble

69,9563

THB

Thai baht

33,415

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5157

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2202

INR

Indian rupee

80,1870

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### Bohdan SENYSZYN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, Respondent.

No. 2007-3297.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 9, 2007.

Bohdan Senyszyn, pro se.

*17Before NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Department of the Treasury moves the court to summarily affirm the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in *Senyszyn v. Department of Treasury,*PH-0752-05-0403-C-2, 106 M.S.P.R. 249 (June 7, 2007). Senyszyn opposes and moves to “reopen” a previous petition for review. The Department replies.

The Department indefinitely suspended Senyszyn after he was arrested and charged with defrauding the United States in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7214(a)(5). The Department informed Senyszyn that he was suspended until the “completion of investigation or resolution of the criminal charges” against him. Senyszyn appealed his suspension to the Board and eventually to this court. We affirmed the Board’s decision, upholding the Department’s imposition of an indefinite suspension. *Senyszyn v. Department of Treasury,*200 Fed.Appx. 990 (Fed.Cir.2006).

Subsequently, a federal grand jury indicted Senyszyn on seven counts, including four counts of “False Returns By An IRS Agent,” in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7214(a)(7). Senyszyn filed a petition for enforcement with the Board, arguing that the Department improperly failed to terminate his suspension when he was not indicted for violating 26 U.S.C. § 7214(a)(5). The Board disagreed, finding that although Senyszyn was not indicted under § 7214(a)(5), the investigation or resolution of the criminal charges against Senyszyn related to his alleged fraud were ongoing and the suspension remained in effect. We affirmed. *Senyszyn v. Department of Treasury,*244 Fed.Appx. 347, 348 (Fed.Cir.2007).

Senyszyn filed another petition for enforcement with the Board. The Board denied this petition as before, finding that the criminal case against Senyszyn was still ongoing. Senyszyn now petitions this court for review of that disposition.

Summary affirmance of a case is appropriate “when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists”. *Joshua v. United States,*17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed.Cir. 1994). As discussed above, Senyszyn has already sought review of a Board decision rejecting his argument that his indefinite suspension should be terminated because he was not indicted under 26 U.S.C. § 7214(a)(5). We conclude that no substantial question exists regarding the outcome of this petition for review and that summary affirmance is appropriate.

Senyszyn also moves to reopen his petition for review decided by this court in 2006. The mandate issued long ago in that case and Senyszyn’s motion is denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Department’s motion is granted and the Board’s decision is summarily affirmed.

(2) Senyszyn’s motion is denied.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: July 18, 2007



By

/S/    Fumihiko IkeName:

Fumihiko IkeTitle:

Chief Operating Officer for Business Management Operations Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6532

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. AKIN SEAN EL PRECISE BEY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. ( 5:15

- cr - 00166

- BR

- 1 ; 5:19

- cv - 00209

- BR )

Submitted : July 29, 2021 Decided: August 12, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN , Circuit Judge , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Akin Sean El Precise Bey , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ak in Sean El Precise Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certif icate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that th e dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independentl y reviewed the record and conclude that Bey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we grant his motion s to file supplemental briefs, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* We decline to address Bey’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Pornomo v. United States , 814 F.3d 681, 686 (4th Cir. 2016).
422.1403 Waivers. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary for Administration is authorized to make the waiver determinations under FAR 22.1403(a) and (b) with the concurrence of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Department of Labor.
( b ) The contracting officer shall submit requests for waivers through the HCA to the SPE for determination by the Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996, as amended at 70 FR 46, Jan. 3, 2005]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY,
the CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, and ALAN
H. LUND, the VICE CHAIRMAN-FINANCE, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND
CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE
CORPORATION (the Company), pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, hereby certifies that to the
best of their knowledge:



| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i)  | the Companys Annual Report on
    Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.                                                              

Dated: February 2, 2004

| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/ STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY
| |                         
| | Steven F. Udvar-Hazy    

Dated: February 2, 2004

| |                 
| | ----------------
| | /s/ ALAN H. LUND
| |                 
| | Alan H. Lund
# C_2020273EN.01000301.xml

| 18.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

17 August 2020

(2020/C 273/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1853 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4470 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90625 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3108 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0765 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 161,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5120 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,140 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 348,53 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3966 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8343 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,7656 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6485 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5684 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1864 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8179 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6237 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 405,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 20,6764 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2262 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5300 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 638,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9688 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,693 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 87,1500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,993 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4166 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 26,0924 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,6895 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1853

JPY

Japanese yen

125,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4470

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90625

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3108

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0765

ISK

Iceland króna

161,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5120

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,140

HUF

Hungarian forint

348,53

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3966

RON

Romanian leu

4,8343

TRY

Turkish lira

8,7656

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6485

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5684

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1864

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8179

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6237

KRW

South Korean won

1 405,87

ZAR

South African rand

20,6764

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2262

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5300

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 638,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9688

PHP

Philippine peso

57,693

RUB

Russian rouble

87,1500

THB

Thai baht

36,993

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4166

MXN

Mexican peso

26,0924

INR

Indian rupee

88,6895

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
- Budget for the U.S. Department of Education- President's Education budget request
- Budget tables
- Budget news
- ED budget process and calendar

      - Congressional Budget Justifications
      - Program Inventory
      - Strategic Plan
      - FY 2024 Lapse Plan Department of Education [**PDF,** 314KB]
      - Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan
      - High Priority Performance Goals
      - Annual Performance Plans and Reports
      - Inspector General Audits and Investigative Reports and How to Report Waste, Fraud, or Abuse to the Inspector General
      - GAO High-Risk Improvement Plans with status of implementation
409.407-3 Procedures. ( a ) *Investigation and referral.* When a contracting officer becomes aware of possible irregularities or any information which may be sufficient cause for suspension, the case shall be immediately referred through the HCA to the debarring official. The case must be accompanied by a complete statement of the facts along with a recommendation for action. Where the statement of facts indicates the irregularities to be possible criminal offenses, or for any other reason further investigation is considered necessary, the matter shall be referred to the HCA who should consult with the Office of Inspector General to determine if further investigation is required prior to referring it to the debarring official.
( b ) *Decision-making process.* If, after reviewing the recommendations and consulting with the Office of Inspector General and Office of the General Counsel, as appropriate, the debarring official determines suspension is justified, the debarring official shall initiate the proposed suspension in accordance with FAR 9.407-3(c) and notify the HCA of the action taken.
( c ) *Fact-finding proceedings.* For actions listed under FAR 9.407-3(b)(2), the contractor shall be given the opportunity to appear at an informal hearing, similar in nature to the hearing for debarments as discussed in 409.406-3(c).