alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>



<CAPTION>
1997 Financial Data Schedule (Q3 Restated)
<S>                            <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS-Restated     9-MOS-Restated
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-28-1997        SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                         32,523             43,654
<SECURITIES>                   43,960             41,060
<RECEIVABLES>                  53,704             58,936
<ALLOWANCES>                   961                937
<INVENTORY>                    56,617             50,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               155,698            167,924
<PP&E>                         163,604            171,315
<DEPRECIATION>                 89,987             92,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 273,150            290,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          53,897             63,320
<BONDS>                        0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0                  0
<PREFERRED>                    0                  0
<COMMON>                       252                253
<OTHER-SE>                     214,383            223,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   273,150            290,719
<SALES>                        117,277            183,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               117,277            183,205
<CGS>                          58,637             91,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  58,637             91,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               15,733             24,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>               19                 19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             215                323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                20,456             32,676
<INCOME-TAX>                   6,137              9,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            14,319             22,873
<DISCONTINUED>                 0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0                  0
<CHANGES>                      0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                   14,319             22,873
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  0.40               0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0.38               0.60


</TABLE>
Letter Agreement dated October 29, 2009



 Exhibit 10.4 
 October 29, 2009 
 Manitex LiftKing, ULC 
 7135 Islington Avenue 
 Woodbridge, Ontario L4L1V9
Canada 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  

	1.	As used in this letter, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below: 

 “American Note” shall mean the Master Revolving Note in the current principal amount of $5,500,000 dated July 9, 2009, from
the Borrower as maker to the Bank as payee, as amended from time to time. 
 “Bank” shall mean Comerica Bank, a Texas
banking association. 
 “Borrower” shall mean Manitex LiftKing, ULC, an Alberta corporation. 
 “Borrowing Base” shall mean, as of any date, the “Advance Formula”, as such term is defined in the Advance Formula
Agreement dated as of January     , 2009, between the Borrower and the Bank, as amended from time to time on such date. 
 “Canadian Dollar Equivalent Amount” shall mean (a) with respect to any amount outstanding under the Canadian Note, such amount, and (b) with respect to any amount outstanding under the
American Note, the Canadian Dollar Exchange Amount. 
 “Canadian Dollar Exchange Amount” shall mean, as of any date,
with respect to any advance under the American Note, the amount of Canadian Dollars which is equivalent to the then outstanding principal amount of such advance at the most favorable spot exchange rate determined by the Bank to be available to it
for the sale of U.S. Dollars for Canadian Dollars at the relevant time. 
 “Canadian Dollars” or “CDN $”
shall mean lawful currency of Canada. 
 “Canadian Note” shall mean the Master Revolving Note in the current principal
amount of CDN $5,500,000 dated December 29, 2006, from the Borrower as maker to the Bank as payee, as amended from time to time. 
 “Indebtedness” shall mean, as of any date, the outstanding principal balance of the Notes on such date. 







 “Maximum Loan Amount” shall mean CDN $5,500,000. 
 “Notes” shall mean the American Note and the Canadian Note. 
 “U.S. Dollars” or “U.S. $” shall mean lawful money of the United States of America. 
  

	2.	The Borrower and the Bank acknowledge and agree that the American Note is intended to offer the Borrower the opportunity to borrow in U.S. Dollars, but only in an
amount such that the Canadian Dollar Equivalent Amount of the sum of all advances outstanding under the Notes shall not exceed the lesser of the Borrowing Base and the Maximum Loan Amount. 

  

	3.	If at any time and for any reason the Canadian Dollar Equivalent Amount of all advances outstanding under the Notes shall exceed the lesser of the Maximum Loan Amount
and the Borrowing Base, the Borrower shall immediately repay an amount of the Indebtedness equal to such excess. 

  

	4.	Any breach of this letter agreement by the Borrower will be an Event of Default under the Notes. 

 If this letter clearly sets forth our understanding regarding these matters, please sign where indicated below and return to me. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,

	
	COMERICA BANK
	
	 James Q. Goudie



 Acknowledged and agreed to 
 as of the date set forth above: 
  

	
	MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC
	
	 By: David H. Gransee

	
	 Its: VP & CFO
(December 9, 1963)

#### Joseph Di Censo, Respondent, v. Rose Gordon, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, entered March 7, 1963. The appeal was erroneously taken to this court. The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department is presently vested with the jurisdiction of such appeals from the County Court, Westchester County. The motion and the appeal are therefore transferred to said Appellate Term of the Supreme Court (see N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d; order No. 47 of this court, dated July 12, 1962). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
# C_2018187EN.01000201.xml

| 1.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 May 2018

(2018/C 187/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1699 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4436 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87680 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2683 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1526 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5375 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,797 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 318,89 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3058 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6508 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,2628 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5414 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5038 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1818 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6681 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5656 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 261,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,7031 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4951 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3870 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 269,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6562 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,507 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,5759 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,472 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3626 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2461 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,8020 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1699

JPY

Japanese yen

127,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4436

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87680

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2683

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1526

ISK

Iceland króna

122,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5375

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,797

HUF

Hungarian forint

318,89

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3058

RON

Romanian leu

4,6508

TRY

Turkish lira

5,2628

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5414

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5038

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1818

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6681

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5656

KRW

South Korean won

1 261,25

ZAR

South African rand

14,7031

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4951

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3870

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 269,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6562

PHP

Philippine peso

61,507

RUB

Russian rouble

72,5759

THB

Thai baht

37,472

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3626

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2461

INR

Indian rupee

78,8020

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
*Wegener      Corporation and Subsidiary*

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer **

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | **•** |  | fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-------------|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **•** |   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                    Robert A. Placek |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| **Name:**                               | **Robert                    A. Placek** |
| **Title:**                              | **Chairman of the Board, President and ****Chief Executive Office (Principal ****Executive Officer)** |
| **Date:**                               | **November                    26, 2008** |

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

REGINA FAZIO
, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL FAZIO
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 272

[ January 6, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Laura M. Watson , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE13

- 001559(42)

.

Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Hollywood , for appellant.

Rocco G. Marucci, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

C ONFESSION OF E RROR

P ER C URIAM

.

Upon consideration of the record and the appellee’s soundly based confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s motion to vacate the fourth amended qualified dom estic

relations order . We remand this matter to the trial co urt for further proceedings to determine whether the mediated settlement agreement entered into by the parties is ambiguous, and, if so, to conduct an evidentiary hearing as to the proper interpretation of that agreement and to enter an appropriate qualifi ed domestic relations order that comports

with its terms. Teague v. Teague , 122 So. 2d 3d 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Reversed and Remanded

.

L EVINE
, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SJGS BART analysis - responses to questions from EPA Region 6
	Norem, Nancy 
	to:
	Joe Kordzi
	10/08/2010 11:24 AM
	Cc:
	"Gannon, Maureen", "McGuffey, Mack", "Fischer, Diane M.", "Lucas, Kyle J."
	Show Details



History:	This message has been replied to and forwarded.




Joe,
 
Enclosed are two documents [Resp SO3 Q from EPA of 100929.pdf, Resp EPA Q 9-29 Diff Est.pdf] responding to questions you sent PNM regarding 
the SJGS BART analysis.  Specifically, one of the documents addresses the 
items that were not included in the original BART estimate.  The second 
document responds to questions concerning SO3 emissions.
 
Nancy Norem
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 214 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 214

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Migratory Bird Hunting; Final 2024-25 
          Frameworks for Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2024

Mr. Palmer submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Migratory Bird Hunting; Final 2024-25 
          Frameworks for Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating 
to ``Migratory Bird Hunting; Final 2024-25 Frameworks for Migratory 
Bird Hunting Regulations'' (89 Fed. Reg. 68500; published August 26, 
2024), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### Claudia Walker v. Milton U. Sheldon et al.

Motion by defendant Milton U. Sheldon for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendant’s motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law?” Settle order on notice. Motion by defendants Samuel F. Chemoble, Edith Chernoble, Comet Press Books Corp. and Comet Press, Inc., for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted to the extent of certifying the following question: “Was the order of this Court, entered November 25, 1960, insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to strike from the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial the allegations relating to punitive damages, properly made as a matter of law? ” Settle order on notice. Concur—• Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Eager, JJ.
#### Carnegie Hall Corporation v. Pola Schreiber et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
Exhibit 23Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsFarmers
Capital Bank Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement Numbers 333-63037 and 333-116801 on Forms S-8 of Farmers Capital
Bank Corporation of our reports dated March 10, 2006 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation, and managements assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Crowe Chizek and
Company LLC

Crowe Chizek and Company
LLCLouisville, KentuckyMarch 10, 2006
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10K) of Hanover Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February 1, 2000 included in
the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Hanover Bancorp, Inc.
        We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-78538) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-73472, 33-73470
and 33-73796) of Hanover Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February 1, 2000 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Hanover Bancorp, Inc.
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.


                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 17, 2000


                                         63
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MICHAEL E. KOSSNAR,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2022-2077

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 20-5025, Judge Joseph L. Toth.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter 

Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant. 

 IGOR HELMAN, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, 

DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by 

BRIAN M. BOYNTON, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY, LOREN MISHA 

PREHEIM; EVAN SCOTT GRANT, Y. KEN LEE, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 

Case: 22-2077 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 02/13/2024
 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 13, 2024

Date

Case: 22-2077 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 02/13/2024
EXHIBIT 11   STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Cith National Bancshares Corporation

Computation of Earnings Per Common Share on a
Primary & Fully Diluted Basis

In thousands, except per share data

                                                               December 31,

                                                             1995           1994

Net Income
Net Income applicable to primary
   common shares .................................       $    802       $  1,724

Interest expense on convertible
    subordinated debentures, net of ..............             13             13
    income tax

Net income applicable to fully
    diluted common shares ........................            815          1,737

Number of average shares
Primary ..........................................        111,141        111,141

Fully diluted:
    Average common shares
      outstanding ................................        111,141        111,141
    Average convertible
      subordinated ...............................         13,850         13,850
    debentures converted to
      common shares ..............................        124,991        124,991


Net income per share

Primary ..........................................       $   7.23       $  15.51
Fully diluted ....................................           6.52          13.90
# CA2019147EN.01000201.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 147/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 147/2

---

Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Publication of two vacancies for the function of Member of the Board and Director of Resolution Planning and Decisions (COM/2019/20035)

(

  Official Journal of the European Union C 115 A of 27 March 2019

  )

(2019/C 147 A/02)

On page 10, ‘Closing date’:

for:

‘The deadline for applications is 29 April 2019. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time’,

read:

read

‘The deadline for applications is 17 May 2019. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time’.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  (1)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: July 25, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ JERROLD J. PELLIZZON

Jerrold J. PellizzonChief Financial Officer
#### 311.7201 Funding and sponsorship.

Funding a conference through a HHS contract does not automatically imply HHS sponsorship, unless the conference is funded entirely by the agency. Also, HHS staff attendance or participation at a conference does not imply HHS conference sponsorship. Accordingly, for non-conference contracts funded entirely by HHS prior to a contractor claiming HHS sponsorship, the contractor must provide the contracting officer a written request for permission to designate HHS the conference sponsor. The OPDIV or STAFFDIV (operating division or staff division) head, or designee, shall approve such requests. The determination on what constitutes a “conference contract” or a “non-conference contract” shall be made by the contracting officer.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL  OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cybrdi Inc. (“We") for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xue Bu, the principal financial officer
of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of us




Date: August
      13, 2009
              
              /s/
      Xu
      BuName:  Xue Bu, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Wyndham International, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and
accompanies this annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Wyndham International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Elizabeth Schroeder, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 15, 2005.



/s/    Elizabeth SchroederName:

Elizabeth Schroeder




Subscribed and sworn to before
me

this 15th day of March 2005.



|                   |  |              
|------------------ |  | -------------
|                  
|/s/    Vita Branch
|Name:              |  | Vita Branch  
|Title:             |  | Notary Public



My commission expires: 12-6-08



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by
the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.