alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020325EN.01001001.xml

| 2.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/10

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 October 2020

Euro exchange rates (2)

1 October 2020

(2020/C 325/09)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1752 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4421 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90723 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4853 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0787 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 162,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,9073 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,918 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,89 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4935 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8740 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,0606 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6319 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5616 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1082 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7667 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6004 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 365,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,5373 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9805 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5630 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 423,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8788 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,931 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,6050 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,101 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,5821 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,6764 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,8275 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1752

JPY

Japanese yen

123,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4421

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90723

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4853

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0787

ISK

Iceland króna

162,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,9073

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,918

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,89

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4935

RON

Romanian leu

4,8740

TRY

Turkish lira

9,0606

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6319

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5616

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1082

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7667

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6004

KRW

South Korean won

1 365,03

ZAR

South African rand

19,5373

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9805

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5630

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 423,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8788

PHP

Philippine peso

56,931

RUB

Russian rouble

90,6050

THB

Thai baht

37,101

BRL

Brazilian real

6,5821

MXN

Mexican peso

25,6764

INR

Indian rupee

85,8275

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Ilija Krimer, Deceased. Maria Bricker et al., Appellants; William D. Krimer, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to probate the last will and testament of the decedent, the parties appeal as follows from a decree and order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, rendered July 20, 1960 upon the oral decision of the court after a jury trial on framed issues: (1) The objeetant, the decedent’s widow (an incompetent), by her special guardian, appeals: (a) from so much of the decree, entered on a directed verdict, as admitted the will to probate and as fixed said special guardian’s fee at $4,500; and (b) from the order, which denied the motion of the objeetant, Maria Bricker, decedent’s daughter, to set aside the directed verdict and for a new trial. (2) The objeetant Maria Bricker appeals: (a) from so much of said decree as admitted the will to probate, and (b) from said order. Decree, insofar as appealed from, and order, affirmed, with one bill of costs to the proponent William D. Krimer and one bill of costs to the special guardian for the objeetant widow, payable out of the estate. Ho opinion. Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., concurs in the affirmance of the decree insofar as it relates to the special guardian’s fee, but otherwise dissents from the affirmance of the decree and order; and votes to reverse the decree insofar as it admits the will to probate, to reverse the order denying the motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: The will admitted to probate was executed about 10 months before decedent died. When he died, at the age of about 83, he was then suffering from cerebral arteriosclerosis, brain cancer, blindness in his left eye and glaucoma in his right eye. He could not read or write English. The three attesting witnesses were all witnesses interested in having the will admitted to probate. The will was drawn by the son’s attorneys; the son was the intermediary between the testator and the attorneys; and it was the son who brought the testator to the attorneys’ office on the day of the execution of the will. Under the plan of this will, 90% of an estate totaling over $500,000 was given to the son and only 10% to the daughter, whereas under the plan of a prior will, drawn in 1953 by the testator’s attorneys, 60% was given to the son and 40% to the daughter. In my opinion, these circumstances are sufficient to require the objections to the will to be submitted to a jury for determination.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Communications and Outreach Home |
|                                            |

                - **2023-2024 Application** [**PDF**, 396K]

#### 2024 Non-Public School Assessment Information

                - High Performing  [**PDF**, 377K]
                - Achievement Gap Closing [**PDF**, 314K]
                - Number of Nominations per CSSO, DoDEA, BIE and CAPE
                - 2024 Timeline and Process for Non-Public Schools

### 2023-2024 National Blue Ribbon Schools Program Timeline and Process:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Scott A. Montgomery, certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of NationalMercantile Bancorp;

 

2. Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the smallbusiness issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.  Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | January 10, 2007        |   | /s/ Scott  A. Montgomery |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Scott A. Montgomery     |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          12,985
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             434
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     87,539
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          87,539
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            87,539
<LOANS>                                        204,985
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,381
<DEPOSITS>                                     272,841
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,016
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,931
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,160
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 320,381
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,489
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,807
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    83
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,379
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,529
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,198
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,181
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      712
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 137
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,903
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,425
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,425
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.40
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,448
<LOANS-PAST>                                       462
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,069
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      744
<RECOVERIES>                                       243
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,280
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,492
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            788
        

</TABLE>
# FY 2021 HSI STEM
(February 15, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Buie, Appellant.

— Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on January 24, 1977, withdrawn. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Silverman, Fein, Markewich and Sandler, JJ.
#### PROBST v. LEGGETT et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Dismissal—Costs—Taxation.

Under Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902. p. 1561, c. 580) § 248, providing that judgment that the action he dismissed, with costs, without prejudice to a new action, shall be rendered, where plaintiff voluntarily discontinues the action before it is finally submitted on discontinuance before final judgment jthe justice must render judgment of dismissal, with costs, leaving the question of taxation and review to be determined pursuant to sections 341, 342 (page 1589).

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District.

Action by Samuel Probst against Francis H. Leggett and others. From a judgment for defendants without costs, they appeal. Modified.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Edward S. Hosmer, for appellants.

Steuer, Hoffman & Wahle, for respondent.

MacLEAN, J.

After the trial had been begun, and a witness sworn u.nd examined, the plaintiff applied to discontinue the action, to which the defendants objected unless judgment of discontinuance were awarded them, with costs; but the judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants without costs. By section 248 of the Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, p. 1561, c. 580) it is provided that “judgment that the action be dismissed with costs without prejudice to a new action, shall be rendered where the plaintiff voluntarily discontinues the action before it is finally submitted.” It was obligatory upon the trial justice to render judgment accordingly, and leave the question of taxation and review to be determined pursuant to the provisions of sections 341 and 342 of the same act (page 1589). See A. Blum, Jr., Sons v. O’Connor (decided at present term) 84 N. Y. Supp. 207. The judgment must be modified, therefore, by the addition of costs.

Judgment appealed from modified by the addition of costs, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to the appellants. All concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOFFICES
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Home |
|                                                   |

**Program Office:  Elementary and Secondary Education/**Office of Academic Improvement

**CFDA Number:** 84.362A**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants**Also Known As:** Native Hawaiian Education Program, Education for Native Hawaiians

The purpose of this program is to develop innovative education programs to assist Native Hawaiians and to supplement and expand programs and authorities in the area of education.

Authorized activities include, among others: early education and care programs; family-based education centers; beginning reading and literacy programs; activities to address the needs of gifted and talented Native Hawaiian students; special education programs; professional development for educators;and activities to enable Native Hawaiian students to enter and complete postsecondary education programs.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | State Resources Directory |  |
|  |
|  | NCLB Desktop Reference |  |
|  |
|  | ED Job Openings |  |
|  |
|  | Teacher and Principal Resources |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000715366
<NAME> KEYSTONE HERITAGE GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          22,832
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             181
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     62,596
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          91,652
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            92,081
<LOANS>                                        422,534
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 616,307
<DEPOSITS>                                     526,833
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,478
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,319
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,438
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,358
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 616,307
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 36,725
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,940
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   309
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                44,974
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,490
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,494
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,480
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  79
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,599
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,599
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,720
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                        973
<LOANS-PAST>                                       624
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,025
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      895
<RECOVERIES>                                       606
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,736
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,736
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,790


</TABLE>
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-24-00181-CV 

 

CATHY DIANE SCHNIEDERJAN, APPELLANT 

V. 

LARRY RAY SCHNIEDERJAN, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 69th District Court 

Dallam County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 12,123, Honorable Kimberly Allen, Presiding 

August 19, 2024 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Cathy Diane Schniederjan, appeals from the trial court’s judgment. Now 

pending before this Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion seeking voluntary dismissal 

of the appeal. The Court finds that the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party 

from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court 

has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the 

motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning the payment of costs, 
2

costs will be taxed against Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for 

rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam
#### Marshall M. Yetter et al., Respondents, v. Dorothy Olsen, Appellant.

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: In the proper exercise of discretion, the motion should have been granted. (Appeal from part of an order of Monroe Special Term denying defendant’s motion for change of venue.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veeehio, JJ.
# C_2017077EN.01000101.xml

| 11.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8386 — Advent/Bain Capital/Concardis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 77/01)

On 7 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8386. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8386. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---