alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                       4,473 <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               66,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 2,401
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                     187,698
<DEPRECIATION>                                               6,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             258,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                    157,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                        80
<OTHER-SE>                                                  77,746
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               258,412
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            24,645
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             5,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           8,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              5,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 5,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.65
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES $886 OF RESTRICTED CASH.
</FN>



</TABLE>
# C_2019103EN.01000101.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 103/01)

Last publication

OJ C 93, 11.3.2019

Past publications

OJ C 82, 4.3.2019

OJ C 72, 25.2.2019

OJ C 65, 18.2.2019

OJ C 54, 11.2.2019

OJ C 44, 4.2.2019

OJ C 35, 28.1.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 401 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 401

Designating May 5, 2018 as the ``National Day of Awareness for Missing 
                 and Murdered Native Women and Girls''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2018

    Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Udall, Mr. 
    Gardner, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Crapo, and Mr. Rounds) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating May 5, 2018 as the ``National Day of Awareness for Missing 
                 and Murdered Native Women and Girls''.

Whereas, according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some 
        tribal communities, American Indian women face murder rates that are 
        more than 10 times the national average murder rate;
Whereas, according to the most recently available data from the Centers for 
        Disease Control and Prevention, in 2015, homicide--

    (1) ranged from the second to seventh leading cause of death for 
American Indian and Alaska Native females between 1 and 39 years of age; 
and

    (2) remained a leading cause of death for most American Indian and 
Alaska Native females between 40 and 64 years of age;

Whereas little data exist on the number of missing American Indian and Alaska 
        Native women and girls in the United States;
Whereas, on July 5, 2013, Hanna Harris, a member of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe, 
        was reported missing by her family in Lame Deer, Montana;
Whereas the body of Hanna Harris was found 5 days after she went missing;
Whereas Hanna Harris was determined to have been raped and murdered, and the 
        individuals accused of committing those crimes were convicted;
Whereas the case of Hanna Harris is an example of many similar cases; and
Whereas Hanna Harris was born on May 5, 1992: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 5, 2018, as the ``National Day of 
        Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native Women and Girls''; 
        and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups--
                    (A) to commemorate the lives of missing and 
                murdered American Indian and Alaska Native women and 
                girls whose cases are documented and undocumented in 
                public records and the media; and
                    (B) to demonstrate solidarity with the families of 
                the victims in light of those tragedies.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50640 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Ignacio Trevizo**

**- Cortez,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 517

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Higginson,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Ignacio Trevizo

- Cortez appeals his conviction and sentence for reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Trevizo

- Cortez argues that treating a prior conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b)(2) as a sentencing factor, rather than as

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 11, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce C lerk Case: 21-50640 Document: 00516199796 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/11/2022No. 21

- 50640

2 an element of the offense, violates the Constitution and rendered his guilty plea unknowing and involuntary. He correctly concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he wishes to preserve it for further review. The Government has moved without opposition for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file its brief.
As the Government asserts and as Trevizo

- Cortez concedes, the sole issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553

- 54 (5th Cir. 2019) ; United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014). Because the Government’s position “is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), summary affirmance is proper. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , and the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time is **DENIED**

. Case: 21-50640 Document: 00516199796 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/11/2022
## Legislation

- Title III, Part F, Section 371 of the Higher Education Act, as amended ( 20 U.S.C. 1067q (b) (2) (B) )

## Regulations

*Applicable  Regulations:* (a) The  Education Department General Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and  Budget (OMB) Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension  (Non procurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as  regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative  Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as  regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) Supplemental Priorities.”

Institutional Service Home
#### Ruby Freeman, Respondent, v. New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Order entered on June 22, 1961 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. No opinion. [30 Misc 2d 918.] Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
29.402-3 Tax on certain foreign procurements. ( a ) Insert the provision at 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and Representation, in solicitations, including solicitations using part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, unless one of the following exceptions applies: ( 1 ) Acquisitions using simplified acquisition procedures that do not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (as defined in 2.101).
( 2 ) Emergency acquisitions using the emergency acquisition flexibilities defined in part 18.
( 3 ) Acquisitions using the unusual and compelling urgency authority per 6.302-2.
( 4 ) Contracts with a single individual for personal services that will not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold on an annual calendar year basis for all years of the contract.
( 5 ) Acquisitions if the requiring activity identifies that the requirement is for certain foreign humanitarian assistance contracts which are payments made by the U.S. Government agencies pursuant to a contract with a foreign contracting party to obtain goods or services described in or authorized under 7 U.S.C. 1691, *et seq.,* 22 U.S.C. 2151, *et seq.,* 22 U.S.C 2601 *et seq.,* 22 U.S.C. 5801 *et seq.,* 22 U.S.C. 5401 *et seq.,* 10 U.S.C. 402, 10 U.S.C. 404, 10 U.S.C. 407, 10 U.S.C. 2557, and 10 U.S.C. 2561.
( b ) Insert the clause at 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, in— ( 1 ) Solicitations that contain the provision at 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and Representation; and
( 2 ) Resultant contracts in which the contractor has indicated that it was a foreign person in solicitation provision 52.229-11, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements—Notice and Representation.
[85 FR 27100, May 6, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 61029, Nov. 4, 2021]
#### 32.1102 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Electron Funds Transfer information (EFT)* means information necessary for making a payment by EFT through specified EFT mechanisms.

*Governmentwide commercial purchase card* means a card that is similar in nature to a commercial credit card that is used to make financing and delivery payments for supplies and services. The purchase card is an EFT method and it may be used as a means to meet the requirement to pay by EFT, to the extent that purchase card limits do not preclude such payments.

*Payment information* means the payment advice provided by the Government to the contractor that identifies what the payment is for, any computations or adjustments made by the Government, and any information required by the Prompt Payment Act.

[64 FR 10540, Mar. 4, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 2132, Jan. 10, 2001]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                  
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

November 14, 2006

.
# C_2017284EN.01000401.xml

| 29.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 August 2017

(2017/C 284/06)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1925 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,34 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92328 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5155 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1389 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2620 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,102 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,01 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 0,0000 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5977 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1063 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5008 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4866 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3292 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6458 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6156 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5562 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8979 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4145 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 903,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0889 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,841 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,6590 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,591 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7568 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0584 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,2065 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1925

JPY

Japanese yen

130,34

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92328

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5155

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1389

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2620

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,102

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,01

PLN

Polish zloty

0,0000

RON

Romanian leu

4,5977

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1063

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5008

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4866

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3292

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6458

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6156

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,56

ZAR

South African rand

15,5562

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8979

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4145

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 903,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0889

PHP

Philippine peso

60,841

RUB

Russian rouble

69,6590

THB

Thai baht

39,591

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7568

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0584

INR

Indian rupee

76,2065

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MELINDA CHARLES, 1 Petitioner Below, Appellant,

v. BRIAN CHARLES, Respondent Below, Appellee. § § § No. 318, 2019 § § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware § § File No. CK11-02876 § Petition Nos. 19-18751 and § 19-18972 § Submitted: August 1, 2019 Decided: August 8, 2019

Before VAUGHN , SEITZ , and TRAYNOR , Justices. ORDER After consideration of the response to the notice to show cause, it appears to

the Court that: (1) On July 23, 2019, the appellant, Meli nda Charles (“the Mother”) filed a notice of appeal from two Family Court orders, dated July 22, 2019, denying her motions for emergency ex parte orders in her petitions fo r visitation and custody. The Family Court referred the Mother’s allegations to the Division of Family Services for investigation. The petitions for visitation and cu stody remain pending in the Family Court.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Suprem e Court Rule 7(d).2 (2) The Senior Court Clerk issued a no tice directing the Mother to show cause why this appeal should not be dism issed for her failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 in taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. In her response to the notice to show cause, the Mo ther argues the merits of her appeal, but

does not address the interlocutor y nature of the appeal. (3) An order constitutes a final judgment when it leaves nothing for future

determination or consideration. 2 The Family Court orders denying the Mother’s motions for emergency ex parte orders are interlocutory because the Family Court did not finally resolve the merits of the Mo ther’s petitions for visitation and custody. Absent compliance with Rule 42, the appella te jurisdiction of this Court is limited

to review of final trial court orders. 3 The Mother’s non-compliance with Rule 42 leaves this Court without jurisdiction to h ear her interlocutory appeal. The Mother may appeal once the Family Court issues final orders in the custody and visitation proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

2 Werb v. D'Alessandro , 606 A.2d 117, 119 (Del. 1992). 3 Julian v. State , 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982).
311.7202 Contract clause. To ensure that a contractor: ( a ) Properly requests approval to designate HHS the conference sponsor, where HHS is not the sole provider of conference funding; and
( b ) Includes an appropriate Federal funding disclosure and content disclaimer statement for conference materials, the contracting officer shall include the clause at 352.211-2, Conference Sponsorship Request and Conference Materials Disclaimer, in solicitations, contracts, and orders providing funding which partially or fully supports a conference.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

The following Web sites contain information that may be useful for individuals interested in the GEAR UP program. These sites contain information about GEAR UP grantees, programs upon which the GEAR UP program was modeled, and strategies for encouraging high-risk middle- and high-school students to prepare for college.  Disclaimer
                - The College Board
                - National Council for Community and  Education Partnerships
                - Project Grad
                - The I Have a Dream Foundation
                - National Mentoring Partnership
                - America's Promise: The Alliance for  Youth
                - AVID: Proving Achievement.  Lifelong Advantage
                - Archived GEAR UP Resources

Student Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### 352.211-2 Conference Sponsorship Requests and Conference Materials Disclaimer.

As prescribed in HHSAR 311.7202, the Contracting Officer shall insert the following clause:

# Conference Sponsorship Request and Conference Materials Disclaimer (DEC 2015)

(a) If HHS is not the sole provider of funding under this contract, then, prior to the Contractor claiming HHS conference sponsorship, the Contractor shall submit a written request (including rationale) to the Contracting Officer for permission to claim such HHS sponsorship.

(b) Whether or not HHS is the conference sponsor, the Contractor shall include the following statement on conference materials, including promotional materials, agendas, and Web sites:

“This conference was funded, in whole or in part, through a contract (insert contract number) with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (insert name of OPDIV or STAFFDIV). The views expressed in written conference materials and by speakers and moderators at this conference, do not necessarily reflect the official policies of HHS, nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.”

(c) Unless authorized in writing by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall not display the HHS logo on any conference materials.

(End of clause)