alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017404EN.01000201.xml

| 29.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 404/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 404/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 November 2017

(2017/C 404/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1888 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89538 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9060 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1680 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7450 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,463 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,99 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2069 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6413 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6684 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5619 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5208 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2745 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7157 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5983 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 284,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,3342 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8431 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5435 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 053,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8786 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,813 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,2929 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,719 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8287 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,0370 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,5795 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1888

JPY

Japanese yen

132,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89538

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9060

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1680

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7450

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,463

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,99

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2069

RON

Romanian leu

4,6413

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6684

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5619

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5208

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2745

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7157

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5983

KRW

South Korean won

1 284,43

ZAR

South African rand

16,3342

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8431

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5435

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 053,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8786

PHP

Philippine peso

59,813

RUB

Russian rouble

69,2929

THB

Thai baht

38,719

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8287

MXN

Mexican peso

22,0370

INR

Indian rupee

76,5795

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
124 STAT. 1352 PUBLIC LAW 111–196—JULY 2, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5569: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

June 23, considered and passed House. 

June 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–196 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until September 30, 2010 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insurance Program Extension Act of 2010’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM. 

(a) PROGRAM EXTENSION.—Section 1319 of the National Flood 

Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 

‘‘September 30, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2010’’. 

(b) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) 

is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘September 30, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2010’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘$20,775,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$20,725,000,000’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsections 

(a) and (b) shall be considered to have taken effect on May 31, 

2010. 

SEC. 3. BUDGET COMPLIANCE. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 

to the vote on passage. 

Approved July 2, 2010. 

42 USC 4016 

note. 

National Flood 

Insurance 

Program 

Extension Act of 

2010. 

42 USC 4001 

note. 

July 2, 2010 

[H.R. 5569] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
# C_2018338EN.01000901.xml

| 21.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 September 2018

(2018/C 338/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1769 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88590 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3350 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1312 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 129,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,560 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,75 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2925 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6545 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,4320 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6158 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5174 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2313 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7643 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6064 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 316,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0297 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0559 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4265 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 471,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8694 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,436 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 78,0670 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,055 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,8390 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,0233 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,7510 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1769

JPY

Japanese yen

131,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88590

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3350

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1312

ISK

Iceland króna

129,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,560

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,75

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2925

RON

Romanian leu

4,6545

TRY

Turkish lira

7,4320

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6158

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5174

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2313

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7643

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6064

KRW

South Korean won

1 316,62

ZAR

South African rand

17,0297

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0559

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4265

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 471,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8694

PHP

Philippine peso

63,436

RUB

Russian rouble

78,0670

THB

Thai baht

38,055

BRL

Brazilian real

4,8390

MXN

Mexican peso

22,0233

INR

Indian rupee

84,7510

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2018311EN.01000101.xml

| 3.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 311/01)

Last publication

OJ C 301, 27.8.2018

Past publications

OJ C 294, 20.8.2018

OJ C 285, 13.8.2018

OJ C 276, 6.8.2018

OJ C 268, 30.7.2018

OJ C 259, 23.7.2018

OJ C 249, 16.7.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 12, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00876

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF R.D.,

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Te xas

Trial Court No. 2013

- JUV

- 01230

The Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief is GRANTED. The appellee’s

brief is due on June 2, 2014.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

FLAVA WORKS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOES 1-26, FF MAGNAT LIMITED, et al.,

Defendant.

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 12-cv-5844

Judge Robert W. Gettlemen

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS OBJECTOR’S COUNSEL

NOW COMES Mark Wallin, attorney for OBJECTOR COMCAST CABLE 

COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, and moves this Honorable Court for leave to withdraw as attorney 

for the Objector in the above captioned matter.

WHEREFORE, Mark Wallin requests this Honorable Court grant leave to withdraw as 

attorney for Objector.

Dated: October 1, 2013. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Mark W. Wallin

Paul F. Stack

Mark W. Wallin

STACK & O’CONNOR CHARTERED

140 South Dearborn Street 

Suite 411

Chicago, IL 60603

Tel: (312) 782-0690

Fax: (312) 782-0936

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 100 Filed: 10/01/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2349
# FY23
#### BAYCHAR, INC. and Baychar Holdings LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SALOMON NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2008-1052.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 18, 2008.

*999John W. Kepler, III, Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, LC, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Cathy J. Futrowsky and Daniel T. Simpson, Jr.

Donald A. Degnan, Holland & Hart LLP, of Boulder, Colorado, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was James E. Hartley, of Denver, Colorado.

Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In this infringement action, the district court entered a judgment of non-liability, holding, inter alia, that liability for patent infringement was precluded on the ground of implied license / patent exhaustion.

Defendant-appellee Salomon North America, Inc. (“Salomon”) argues that the judgment of non-liability should be affirmed on the ground of implied license. The implied license holding was set forth in the Nov. 6, 2006, Order Affirming the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge. Although parts of the Nov. 6, 2006, *judgment*were vacated, the *decision*upon which that judgment rested was not vacated. Counsel for plaintiffs-appellants Baychar, Inc. and Baychar Holdings, LLC, (“Baychar”) conceded in oral argument that the Nov. 6, 2006, decision was incorporated into the final amended judgment of Sept. 10, 2007, and acknowledged that the final judgment “rests both on Judge Horn-by’s decision and on the [Nov. 6, 2006] decision.” Oral Arg. at 7:30-7:43. On appeal, counsel raised no objection to the merits of the district court’s finding of implied license. Any objection to this decision was therefore waived. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment of non-liability is affirmed. We need not reach the other grounds asserted for affirmance of the judgment of non-liability.

The district court also held that claim 8 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,048,810 (“the '810 patent”) was invalid, and entered a judgment of invalidity on Salomon’s counterclaim. Counsel for Salomon advised us that we need not reach the issue of invalidity here, and agreed that the judgment of invalidity here could appropriately be vacated. *See*Oral Arg. at 13:51-14:12 (“[I]f this court affirms the Salomon decision ... [on implied license or other grounds], Salomon would agree to have the collateral estoppel decision on invalidity by anticipation vacated... .”). The issue of invalidity of claim 8 of the '810 patent is before this court in a companion case, *Baychar v. Burton Corp.,*No.2008-1053 (Fed. Cir. filed Oct. 1, 2007), and will be resolved in that case. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s judgment of invalidity here.

*AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART.*

COSTS

No costs.
EXHIBIT 10.4   Schedule of Named Executive Officers Compensation
  Name and Principal Position
    
    2011 Base SalaryDonald E. Smith
    
    $
    709,931President and Chairman of the Corporation; Chairman of
First Financial Bank, NANorman L. Lowery
    
    $
    585,826Vice Chairman, CEO and Vice President of the Corporation;
President and CEO of First Financial Bank, NAThomas S. Clary
    
    $
    182,206Senior Vice President and CCO of First Financial Bank, NANorman D. Lowery
    
    $
    180,400Vice President and COO of First Financial Bank, NARodger A. McHargue
    
    $
    179,812CFO of the Corporation; Vice President and CFO of First
Financial Bank, NARichard O. White
    
    $
    170,831Senior Vice President of First Financial Bank, NA
**Exhibit23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (FormS-8 Nos. 333-64316, 333-83723, 333-59667 and 333-33095) of our report datedMarch 31, 2006 except for Notes 1, 2, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 17 as to whichthe date is September 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of National Mercantile Bancorp and subsidiaries included in theAnnual Report (Form 10-KSB/A) for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|  | /s/ Moss Adams LLP |   |
|--|--------------------|--------|

LosAngeles, CaliforniaSeptember 28, 2006

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 23, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00507

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.R.S., A CHILD,

From the 216th Judicial District Court

, Gillespie County, Texa s

Trial Court No. 13540 Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court signed an order terminating appellant’s parental rights on July 17, 2020. Because “termination of the parent

- child relationship [was] at issue” in this case, this appeal is governed by the rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(a); see also T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 109.002(a

- 1). In an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days after the judgment is signed, and that deadline is not extended by the filing of a motion for new trial. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b); In re G. S. , No. 04

- 17

- 00237

- CV, 2017 WL 2457052, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio June 7, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). As a result, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by August 6, 2020, and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due by August 21, 2020. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1, 26.3; In re G.S. , 2017 WL 2457052, at *1.

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on October 14, 2020. “[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke t he appellate court’s jurisdiction.” See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, we ORDER appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed f or lack of jurisdiction by December 3, 2020

. See id . If appellant fails to respond to this order by the date ordered, this appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. All other appellate deadlines are suspended until furth er order of this court.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN W ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of November, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### Robert W. COPPLE; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. ASTRELLA & RICE, PC; et al., Defendants—Appellees. Joseph Wood, Appellant, v. Astrella & Rice, P.C.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

Nos. 06-16635, 06-16762.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2008.

Filed June 2, 2008.

*676Joseph Wood, Esq., Lindley and Wood, San Francisco, CA, for Appellant.

Ethan P. Schulman, Esq., Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: HUG, KLEINFELD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Robert Copple appeals the dismissal of his action with prejudice for failure to state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Joseph Wood appeals the district court’s imposition of Rule 11 sanctions against him. We affirm both rulings.

Copple had standing to bring his claim. *See Schmier v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,*279 F.3d 817, 820-21 (9th Cir.2002). Dismissal was appropriate, however, because Copple’s claim is barred by the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine. *See Dist. Of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 482, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); *Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 415-16, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923). *See also Kougasian v. TMSL, Inc.,*359 F.3d 1136, 1139-41 (9th Cir.2004). Copple’s conspiracy allegations necessarily challenged the state trial court’s determination of state law regarding attorneys fees. The district court properly dismissed Copple’s remaining claims because no due process or other constitutional violation are sufficiently pleaded.

The district court’s dismissal without leave to amend was also proper. Copple could provide no evidence that the judge and defendants had a secret meeting where the judge agreed to sign the proposed order, only that the defendants circulated a proposed order that the judge signed. Attorneys ordinarily and properly serve and submit proposed forms of orders both under California court rules and in federal court, *see*Cal. R. Ct. 3.1113(n); Cal. R. Ct. 3.1312, for judges’ consideration, approval, alteration, or rejection. Therefore, amendment would have been futile, and Copple’s claim should have been dismissed with prejudice.

It was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to impose Rule 11 sanctions on Wood. Wood did not conduct a pre-filing investigation and filed the complaint without any evidence of a violation of law for which the district court could grant relief. *See, e.g., Holgate v. Baldwin,*425 F.3d 671, 675-77 (9th Cir.2005); *W. Coast Theater Corp. v. City of Portland,*897 F.2d 1519, 1527 (9th Cir.1990).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL



## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_

C ASE N O . 6D23

- 1636

L OWER T RIBUNAL N O . 2018

- CA

- 011382

- O

_

S ILVIO B ARBOSA

,

Appellant,

V

.

W AL

- M ART S TORES E AST , LP, d/b/a Store 859,

Appellee.

_

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Kevin B. Weiss, Judge.

May 7, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Agustin R. Benitez, of Benitez Law Group, P.L., Orlando, for Appellant.

Trina S. Hearn and Andrew S. Bolin, of Bolin Law Group, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Case: 1:12-cv-01660 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-01660 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-01660 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-01660 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-01660 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Communications and Outreach Home |
|                                            |

# Carlene Pacheco 2023 RISE Honoree

Paraprofessional, Title VI Liaison, and Family Service SpecialistChurchill County High  School, Fallon, Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo

## 2023 RISE Finalists

### Veronica Gonzalez

Multilingual Family LiaisonMount Vernon, Washington

### Beverly Payne

SecretaryCrestline, Ohio

### Kevan Sprague

Head CustodianWest Jordan, Utah

**2022/2023 RISE Award Nominees**

**Blog Post and Video announcement from Secretary Cardona**

## Previous Years' Honorees

### 2022 Award

                - 2022  Video  announcement from Secretary Cardona.
                - 2022 RISE Honoree:  Keeley Anderson, Paraprofessional at Newcastle Middle School in Newcastle, Wyoming.

### 2021 Award

                - 2021  Blog Post and Video  announcement from Secretary Cardona.
                - 2021  RISE Honoree: Melito Ramirez, Intervention Specialist, Walla Walla High School, Walla Walla, Washington

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for OregonReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for OregonReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Expansion Grants

## Technical Review Form for OregonReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to State Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479580379.unknown

# _1479580380.unknown

# _1479580378.unknown