alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Organizations

- Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institution Educators (AHSIE)
- American Association of Hispanics in Higher Education (AAHHE)
- Excelencia in Education
- Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU)

## Related Web Sites

- White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans***New***
Perkins  Collaborative Resource Network (PCRN)

**Other Federal HSI Funding Sources:**
- National Endowment for the Humanities
- Faculty Research: Programs  for HBCUs, HSIs and TCCUs

**Other Office of Postsecondary Education Funding Sources:**
- International and Foreign Language EducationInstitutional ServiceStudent ServiceOther Resources- Other Applicant and Grantee Resources
- DHSI Resources

Institutional Service Home
  Last Modified: 05/05/2023
#### 416.470 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 452.216-71, Base Fee and Award Fee Proposal, in solicitations which contemplate the award of a cost-plus-award-fee contract.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER TO HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK 

TO PREPARE, CERTIFY, AND FILE

SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK’S RECORD 

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.S., a Child

Appellate case number: 01-15-00451-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-02671J

Our complete review of the above-referenced appeal requires a supplemental clerk’s 

record including the following documents: 

All temporary orders signed by the trial court

between May 12, 2014, and May 12, 2015.

This supplemental clerk’s record is due to be filed in the First Court of Appeals no later 

than September 11, 2015.

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Jane Bland, acting individually

Date: August 25, 2015
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 21--SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     Terre Haute First National Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant. It is an national banking association. It is an Indiana
corporation. The bank conducts its business under the name of Terre Haute First
National Bank.

     First State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. It is a
state corporation in Indiana. The bank conducts its business under the name of
First State Bank.

     First Citizens State Bank of Newport is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant. It is a state corporation in Indiana. The bank conducts its
business under the name of First Citizens State Bank.

     First Farmers State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant.
It is a state corporation in Indiana. The bank conducts its business under the
name of First Farmers State Bank.

     First Ridge Farm State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant. It is a state corporation in Illinois. The bank conducts its
business under the name of First Ridge Farm State Bank.

     First Parke State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. It
is a state corporation in Indiana. The bank conducts its business under the
name of First Parke State Bank.

     First National Bank of Marshall is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant. It is a national banking association. It is an Illinois
corporation. The bank conducts its business under the name of First National
Bank.

     First Crawford State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant.
It is a state corporation in Illinois. The bank conducts its business under the
name of First Crawford State Bank.




                                       5
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY2023

Number of new awards: 7 Average award: $1,131,428.57Total new awards funded: $7,920,000

## FY2022

Number of new awards: 3Average award: $1,370,077Total new awards funded: $2,740,154

## FY 2021

Number of new awards: 5Average award:	$1,053,827Total new awards funded: $5,269,134

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                             253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       14
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   285
<PP&E>                                          11,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (90)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              619
<BONDS>                                          1,642
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,771
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,418
<SALES>                                             53
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    53
<CGS>                                               18
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (432)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.012)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                          600000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5656000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    342000
<INVENTORY>                                    6698000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              13345000
<PP&E>                                        20689000
<DEPRECIATION>                                15954000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18123000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         12853000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        366000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3205000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18123000
<SALES>                                        6066000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6066000
<CGS>                                          5148000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5148000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                347000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              175000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 396000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             392000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 261000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    653000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 24**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,**that each of the undersigned directors and officers of AMCORE Financial, Inc., a Nevada corporation, which is about to file an annual report for the year ended December 31,2005, pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., 20549 hereby constitutes and appoints KENNETH E. EDGE and DONALD H. WILSON, and each of them, histrue and lawful attorney-in-fact and agents with power of substitution and resubstitution, from them and in their name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Company’s Form 10-K and other documents in connection therewith withthe Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto the attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as they might or could do in person, thereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,**know that the undersigned as a director or officer has hereuntoset their hand as of this          day of                     , 2006.
|                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATIONS
        Exhibit 32.2
        I, Christopher M. Capone, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|                                                                                                                                                                                                      

|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CH Energy Group, Inc. and Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (the Companies) for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.                                                                                                                                                                

|                       
|-----------------------
|Date:  November 2, 2007
|                       

| | /s/ Christopher M. Capone                                  
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                            
| | Christopher M. Capone                                      
| | Executive Vice President and 
      Chief Financial Officer
| | of CH Energy Group, Inc.                                   
| |                                                            
| |                                                            
| | /s/ Christopher M. Capone                                  
| |                                                            
| | Christopher M. Capone                                      
| | Executive Vice President and 
      Chief Financial Officer
| | of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation               

|77
|--
NO. 07-03-0263-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 22, 2003

______________________________

HERBERT FEIST, APPELLANT

V.

DIRECTORS OF THE TEXAS DEPT. OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, AND THE FIFTH

CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 90,388-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Herbert Feist, appellant, an inmate proceeding pro se, appeals the trial court’s order

dismissing his case for failure to comply with Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and

Remedies Code. We dismiss the appeal.
2

The trial court clerk’s record was filed with this court on August 15, 2003; by letter

dated August 18, this court’s clerk gave notice to appellant of the filing of the trial court

clerk’s record. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. Proc. 38.6(a), appellant’s brief was due

September 15, 2003. By letter dated September 29, 2003, we notified appellant that the

due date for the brief had passed, that the brief had not been filed and no motion for

extension of time to file had been received by the court. Citing Tex. R. App. Proc. 38.8,

the letter also notified appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal unless a

response reasonably explaining his failure to file a brief, together with a showing that the

appellee has not been significantly injured by the failure, was submitted by October 13,

2003. 

Both this court’s August 18 and September 29 letters have been returned to the

court, with the notation “Refused.” By telephone conference with the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice facility in which appellant is confined, this court’s clerk has confirmed

that appellant twice refused to accept delivery of either letter. We find that this court’s

notice to appellant in our August 18 and September 29 letters was effective even though

refused. See Barnes v. Frost Nat’l Bank, 840 S.W. 2d 747 (Tex.App.–San Antonio 1992,

no writ). Appellant has not filed a response to the court’s September 29 letter, nor has he

since submitted a brief or a motion for extension of time. 

Accordingly, having given all parties more than the required ten days’ notice, we

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. Proc. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

James T. Campbell
3

 Justice
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141928 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141928 

 COA: 299176 

Jackson CC: 10-005218-FH 

CAMILLE TRUMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
1UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6382

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL RALPH SAQUELLA, a/k/a Michael Paloma, a/k/a Michael 

Blake,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:07-cr-00305-LMB-1; 1:11-cv-01258-LMB)

Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew McGavock Robinson, ROBINSON & BRANDT, PSC, Covington, 

Kentucky; Jennifer T. Stanton, J.T. STANTON, PC, Norfolk, 

Virginia, for Appellant. Charles Connolly, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Patrick Friel Stokes, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ralph Saquella seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Saquella has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Gregory Leon YOUNG, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Loretta K. KELLY, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 07-7122.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2007.

Decided: Nov. 14, 2007.

Gregory Leon Young, Appellant Pro Se. Denise Colette Anderson, Office of the At*291torney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Leon Young seeks to appeal the disti'ict court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Young has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 210 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

persons who are not citizens, nationals, or lawful permanent residents 

of the United States from voting in elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024 

Mr. PFLUGER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit persons who are not citizens, nationals, 

or lawful permanent residents of the United States from 

voting in elections. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 210 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. A person who is not a person lawfully 

5 accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the 

6 United States, a person owing permanent allegiance to the 

7 United States, or a citizen of the United States may not 

8 vote in any election for Federal, State, Tribal, or local of9 fice, including offices in the District of Columbia or in any 

10 of the territories or possessions of the United States. 

11 ‘‘SEC. 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce 

12 this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS