alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019241EN.01000301.xml

| 17.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 July 2019

(2019/C 241/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1223 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4678 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90260 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5405 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1075 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5933 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,575 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 325,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2555 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7316 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,4002 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5955 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4643 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7736 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6693 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5234 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 322,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5709 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7187 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3905 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 644,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6069 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,114 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,3975 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,662 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2210 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3118 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,0870 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1223

JPY

Japanese yen

121,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4678

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90260

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5405

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1075

ISK

Iceland króna

141,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5933

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,575

HUF

Hungarian forint

325,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2555

RON

Romanian leu

4,7316

TRY

Turkish lira

6,4002

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5955

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4643

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7736

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6693

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5234

KRW

South Korean won

1 322,95

ZAR

South African rand

15,5709

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7187

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3905

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 644,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6069

PHP

Philippine peso

57,114

RUB

Russian rouble

70,3975

THB

Thai baht

34,662

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2210

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3118

INR

Indian rupee

77,0870

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 452.211-71 Equal Products Offered.

As prescribed in 411.171, insert the following or substantially the same clause in solicitations seeking offers on a “brand name or equal” basis to allow offerors the opportunity to clearly identify the “equal” item being offered, and to illustrate how that item meets the salient characteristics requirements of the Government.

# Equal Products Offered (NOV 1996)

(a) Offerors proposing to furnish an “equal” product, in accordance with the “Brand Name or Equal” provision of this solicitation, shall provide the following information for each offered “equal” product:

Contract Line Item Number (if any):

Brand Name or Equal Product identified by the Government in this solicitation:

Offered Product Name:

Catalog Description or part number:

Manufacturer's Name:

Manufacturer's Address:

(b) Offerors are responsible for submitting all additional information on the above product necessary for the Contracting Officer to determine whether the product offered meets the “brand name or equal” product's salient characteristics listed in the solicitation.

(End of clause)

[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996. Redesignated at 63 FR 26996, May 15, 1998.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6594

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CRAIG A. MURPHY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:96-cr-00066-REP-17)

Submitted: August 29, 2011 Decided: September 13, 2011

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig A. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. David Novak, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Craig A. Murphy appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motions to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c) (2006) and pursuant to the All Writs Act. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Murphy, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-17 (E.D. 

Va. Apr. 7, 2011). We have reviewed Murphy’s challenge to his 

sentence under the All Writs Act and conclude that this 

extraordinary remedy is not available in this instance. See

United States v. Carlisle, 517 U.S. 416, 429 (1996); United 

States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 1245 (10th Cir. 2002). 

Accordingly, the district court properly denied Murphy’s motion 

for that relief. Finally, we dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Second Department

(July 8, 1963)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John T. Fryson, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing on appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 20, 1962 denying his motion to obtain certain court records relating to his conviction. Motion denied; the order is not appealable (Code Grim. Pro., § 517). Pglietta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
# C_2020077EN.01000101.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2020/C 77/01)

Last publication

OJ C 68, 2.3.2020

Past publications

OJ C 61, 24.2.2020

OJ C 54, 17.2.2020

OJ C 45, 10.2.2020

OJ C 36, 3.2.2020

OJ C 27, 27.1.2020

OJ C 19, 20.1.2020

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### United States Plywood Corporation, Plaintiff, v. American Revolving Door Co., Inc., Respondent, and Nadel Baxendale, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order entered on January 18,1962 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
29.202 General exemptions. No Federal manufacturers' or special-fuels excise taxes are imposed in many contracting situations as, for example, when the supplies are for any of the following: ( a ) The exclusive use of any State or political subdivision, including the District of Columbia (26 U.S.C. 4041 and 4221).
( b ) Shipment for export to a foreign country or an outlying area of the United States. Shipment must occur within 6 months of the time title passes to the Government. When the exemption is claimed, the words “for export” must appear on the contract or purchase document, and the contracting officer must furnish the seller proof of export (*see* 26 CFR 48.4221-3).
( c ) Further manufacture, or resale for further manufacture (this exemption does not include tires and inner tubes) (26 CFR 48.4221-2).
( d ) Use as fuel supplies, ships or sea stores, or legitimate equipment on vessels of war, including ( 1 ) aircraft owned by the United States and constituting a part of the armed forces and
( 2 ) guided missiles and pilotless aircraft owned or chartered by the United States. When this exemption is to be claimed, the purchase should be made on a tax-exclusive basis. The contracting officer shall furnish the seller an exemption certificate for Supplies for Vessels of War (an example is given in 26 CFR 48.4221-4(d)(2); the IRS will accept one certificate covering all orders under a single contract for a specified period of up to 12 calendar quarters) (26 U.S.C. 4041 and 4221).
( e ) A nonprofit educational organization (26 U.S.C. 4041 and 4221).
( f ) Emergency vehicles (26 U.S.C. 4053 and 4064(b)(1)(c)).
[48 FR 42293, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 662, Jan. 11, 1988; 68 FR 28083, May 22, 2003]
# C_2018069EN.01002201.xml

| 23.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/22

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 February 2018

(2018/C 69/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2276 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4462 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88343 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9963 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1508 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6893 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,316 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,69 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1819 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6555 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6648 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5699 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5589 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6059 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6761 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6232 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,3835 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8085 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4445 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 831,62 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8112 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,911 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,6731 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,761 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0149 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0731 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,8895 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2276

JPY

Japanese yen

131,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4462

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88343

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9963

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1508

ISK

Iceland króna

123,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6893

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,316

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,69

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1819

RON

Romanian leu

4,6555

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6648

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5699

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5589

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6059

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6761

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6232

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,26

ZAR

South African rand

14,3835

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8085

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4445

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 831,62

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8112

PHP

Philippine peso

63,911

RUB

Russian rouble

69,6731

THB

Thai baht

38,761

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0149

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0731

INR

Indian rupee

79,8895

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50228 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RUBEN TINAJERO-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1870

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ruben TinajeroRivera raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Predominantly Black Institutions (PBI) Program Formula Grants

FY 2021 New Awards

State Institution FY 2021

Award Amount

AL Faulkner University $250,000

AL University of West Alabama $250,000

AL Wallace State Community College $250,000

AR Southeast Arkansas College $250,000

CA Los Angeles Southwest Community College $352,289

DC Trinity Washington University $250,000

GA Albany Technical College $320,371

GA Atlanta Technical College $375,087

GA Augusta Technical College $324,464

GA Central Georgia Technical College $489,611

GA Clayton State University $445,198

GA East Georgia State College $250,000

GA Georgia State University Perimeter College $1,099,268

GA Oconee Fall Line Technical College $250,000

GA Savannah Technical College $377,092

GA Southern Crescent Technical College $250,000

GA South Georgia Technical College $250,000

IL Chicago State University $250,000

IL Lincoln University $250,000

IL City Colleges of Chicago Kennedy King College $263,561

IL Olive-Harvey College $266,786

LA Baton Rouge Community College $537,625

MA Roxbury Community College $250,000

MD Prince Georges Community College $748,336

MD University of Baltimore $250,000

MI Wayne Community College $640,133

MS Belhaven University $250,000

MS Hinds Community College $833,178

MS Holmes Community College $552,577

NC Edgecombe Community College $250,000

NJ Bloomfield College $250,000

NY Medgar Evers College $487,619

NY Metropolitan College of New York $255,675

PA Peirce College $250,000

RI Johnson and Wales University $250,000

SC Central Carolina Technical College $349,130

SC Florence Darlington Technical College $250,000

SC Limestone University $250,000

SC Orangeburg-Calhoun College $250,000

TN Baptist Health Sciences University $250,000

TOTAL $14,218,000
#### 32.204 Procedures for contracting officer-specified commercial contract financing.

The financing terms shall be included in the solicitation. Contract financing shall not be a factor in the evaluation of resulting proposals, and proposals of alternative financing terms shall not be accepted (but see 14.208 and 15.206 concerning amendments of solicitations). However, an offer stating that the contracting officer-specified contract financing terms will not be used by the offeror does not alter the evaluation of the offer, nor does it render the offer nonresponsive or otherwise unacceptable. In the event of award to an offeror who declined the proposed contract financing, the contract financing provisions shall not be included in the resulting contract. Contract financing shall not be a basis for adjusting offerors' proposed prices, because the effect of contract financing is reflected in each offeror's proposed prices.

[60 FR 49711, Sept. 26, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 51271, Sept. 30, 1997]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fuquion Hilliard, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 461]—

Cardona, PJ.

*1022Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered January 9, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree. He was sentenced to two years in prison, followed by two years of postrelease supervision.

Initially, defendant’s assertion that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered is unpreserved for our review in light of his failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v Vanguilder,*32 AD3d 1110 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 904 [2006]). In any event, were we to consider this contention, we would find that County Court fully advised defendant of the rights he was relinquishing by pleading guilty and it discussed the terms of the plea agreement, which included no sentencing commitment by the court other than that the sentence imposed would not exceed two years in prison. Defendant acknowledged that he understood these rights as well as the consequences of pleading guilty. Defendant then confirmed that he was entering the plea freely and admitted to having committed the crime. Under these circumstances, the record establishes that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea and received the benefit of the plea bargain *(see People v Decker,*32 AD3d 1079, 1080 [2006]; *People v Schwing,*13 AD3d 725 [2004]).

With regard to defendant’s challenge to the validity of his verbal appeal waiver, we agree that the waiver was insufficient inasmuch as it failed to comply with the requirements set forth in *People v Lopez*(6 NY3d 248 [2006]). Given this conclusion, we have considered defendant’s contention that his sentence was harsh and excessive and find it to be unpersuasive. There is no indication in the record that County Court abused its discretion in imposing sentence, nor are there any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the' interest of justice *(see People v Smith,*32 AD3d 1082, 1082 [2006]).

Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
#### 4.2004 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.204-23, Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab Covered Entities, in all solicitations and contracts.

[83 FR 28143, June 15, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 69510, Oct. 5, 2023]
#### 2822.1310 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 22.1310(a)(1)(ii) and (a)(2).
332.706-2 Provision and clauses for limitation of cost or funds. ( b ) In addition to the clause at FAR 52.232-22, Limitation of Funds, the contracting officer shall insert the provision at 352.232-70, Incremental Funding, in all solicitations when a cost-reimbursement contract for severable services using incremental funding is contemplated. The provision requires the contracting officer to insert a specific increment of performance that the initial funding is expected to cover.
3025.7002-1 Restrictions. The following restrictions implement section 604 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and they apply to all types of actions, orders, exercising of an option and contracts. Except as provided in subsection (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-2, do not acquire, either as end products or components, any item listed in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section, if the item is directly related to the national security interests of the United States and the item has not been grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States: ( a ) Commercial or non-commercial items— ( 1 ) Clothing and the materials and components thereof, other than sensors, electronics, or other items added to, and not normally associated with, clothing (and the materials and components thereof); or
( 2 ) Tents, tarpaulins, covers, textile belts, bags, protective equipment (such as body armor), sleep systems (sleeping bags), load carrying equipment (such as fieldpacks), textile marine equipment, parachutes or bandages.
( b ) Non-commercial items— ( 1 ) Cotton and other natural fiber products.
( 2 ) Woven silk or woven silk blends.
( 3 ) Spun silk yarn for cartridge cloth.
( 4 ) Synthetic fabric or coated synthetic fabric (including all textile fibers and yarns that are for use in such fabrics).
( 5 ) Canvas products.
( 6 ) Wool (whether in the form of fiber or yarn or contained in fabrics, materials, or manufactured articles).
( 7 ) Any item of individual equipment manufactured from or containing any of the fibers, yarns, fabrics, or materials listed in this paragraph (b).
# C_2017050EN.01000101.xml

| 17.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 February 2017

(2017/C 50/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0652 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4341 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85110 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4748 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0647 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,24 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3176 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5223 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9036 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3808 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3865 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2675 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4745 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5104 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 213,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,7837 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3028 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4495 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 188,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7439 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,176 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 60,9025 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,282 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2402 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5975 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,3650 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0652

JPY

Japanese yen

120,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4341

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85110

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4748

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0647

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,24

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3176

RON

Romanian leu

4,5223

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9036

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3808

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3865

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2675

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4745

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5104

KRW

South Korean won

1 213,74

ZAR

South African rand

13,7837

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3028

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4495

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 188,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7439

PHP

Philippine peso

53,176

RUB

Russian rouble

60,9025

THB

Thai baht

37,282

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2402

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5975

INR

Indian rupee

71,3650

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 2825.202 Exceptions.

The authority to make the determinations prescribed in FAR 25.202(a)(1) is delegated to the HCA, or designee.