alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016437EN.01000101.xml

| 25.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 November 2016

(2016/C 437/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0548 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4373 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7658 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0727 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0858 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,034 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,46 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4239 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5100 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,6136 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4274 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4232 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1819 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5096 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5107 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 246,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0085 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2988 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5303 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 292,54 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7043 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,723 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,0798 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,635 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5909 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8850 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,5245 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0548

JPY

Japanese yen

119,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4373

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84800

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7658

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0727

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0858

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,034

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,46

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4239

RON

Romanian leu

4,5100

TRY

Turkish lira

3,6136

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4274

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4232

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1819

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5096

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5107

KRW

South Korean won

1 246,47

ZAR

South African rand

15,0085

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2988

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5303

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 292,54

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7043

PHP

Philippine peso

52,723

RUB

Russian rouble

68,0798

THB

Thai baht

37,635

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5909

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8850

INR

Indian rupee

72,5245

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2020116EN.01000501.xml

| 8.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 April 2020

(2020/C 116/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0885 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4675 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88093 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8788 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0582 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 155,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,0945 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,215 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 357,62 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5356 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8315 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,3562 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7578 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5259 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4381 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8160 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5501 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 319,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,9838 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6802 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 562,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7268 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,915 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,5675 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,665 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,6678 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 26,4166 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,2520 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0885

JPY

Japanese yen

118,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4675

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88093

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8788

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0582

ISK

Iceland króna

155,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,0945

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,215

HUF

Hungarian forint

357,62

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5356

RON

Romanian leu

4,8315

TRY

Turkish lira

7,3562

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7578

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5259

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4381

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8160

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5501

KRW

South Korean won

1 319,39

ZAR

South African rand

19,9838

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6802

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 562,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7268

PHP

Philippine peso

54,915

RUB

Russian rouble

82,5675

THB

Thai baht

35,665

BRL

Brazilian real

5,6678

MXN

Mexican peso

26,4166

INR

Indian rupee

82,2520

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
36.213-4 Notice of award. When a notice of award is issued, it shall be done in writing or electronically, shall contain information required by 14.408, and shall— ( a ) Identify the invitation for bids;
( b ) Identify the contractor's bid;
( c ) State the award price;
( d ) Advise the contractor that any required payment and performance bonds must be promptly executed and returned to the contracting officer;
( e ) Specify the date of commencement of work, or advise that a notice to proceed will be issued.
[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34739, July 3, 1995; 60 FR 42657, Aug. 16, 1995. Redesignated at 62 FR 272, Jan. 2, 1997]
# C_2016454EN.01000203.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/2

---

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 193 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court

(2016/C 454/04)

At its General Meeting on 27 September 2016, the Court designated the First Chamber as the Chamber that is, in accordance with Article 11(2) of the Rules of Procedure, responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 193 of those Rules, for the period from 7 October 2016 to 6 October 2017.

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Review Process

Institutions designated as HBGIs must submit an application.  Funds are allocated based on a statutory formula.  HBGIs that are eligible for grants are specified in the program's authorizing statute.

For any questions, please contact the program office.

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Mission |  |
|  |
|  | Priorities |  |
|  |
|  | Welcome to ED.gov |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
339.203 Applicability. ( a ) Electronic and information technology (EIT) supplies and services must comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (the Act) of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, and the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) Electronic and Information Accessibility Standards (36 CFR part 1194). Requiring activities must consult with their Section 508 Official or designee to determine if the contractor should be responsible for compliance with EIT accessibility standards which apply to Web site content and communications material. ( 1 ) When conducting a procurement and employing the best value continuum, the solicitation shall include a separate technical evaluation factor developed by the contracting officer, requiring activity, and the Operating Division (OPDIV) Section 508 Official or designee.
( 2 ) At a minimum, solicitations for supplies and services shall require the submission of a Section 508 Product Assessment Template (See *http://www.hhs.gov/web/508* for the template). Solicitations for services shall include any other pertinent information that the contracting officer deems necessary to evaluate the offeror's ability to meet the applicable Section 508 accessibility standards.
( 3 ) The HHS Operating Division or Staff Division (OPDIV or STAFFDIV) Section 508 Official or designee is responsible for providing technical assistance in development of Section 508 evaluation factors.
( 4 ) Before conducting negotiations or making an award, the contracting officer shall provide a summary of the Source Selection Evaluation Team's (SSET) assessment of offeror responses to the solicitation's Section 508 evaluation factor. This summary shall be submitted for review by the Section 508 Official or designee. The Section 508 Official or designee shall indicate approval or disapproval of the SSET assessment. The contracting officer shall coordinate the resolution of any issues raised by the Section 508 Official or designee with the chair of the SSET or requiring activity representative, as appropriate. The acquisition process shall not proceed until the Section 508 Official or designee approves the SSET assessment. The contracting officer shall include the assessment in the official contract file. See 339.204-1 regarding processing exception determination requests.
( b ) When acquiring commercial items, if no commercially available supplies or services meet all of the applicable Section 508 accessibility standards, OPDIVs or STAFFDIVs shall, under the direction and approval of the Section 508 Official or designee, acquire the supplies and services that best meet the applicable Section 508 accessibility standards. Process exception determinations for EIT supplies and services not meeting applicable Section 508 accessibility standards in accordance with 339.204-1.
#### 370.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart applies to all research activities conducted under contracts involving human subjects. See 45 CFR 46.102(d) and (f).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 38

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relating to parental rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2023

    Mrs. Lesko (for herself, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Banks, Mrs. Miller of 
    Illinois, Mr. Steube, Mr. Posey, and Mr. Lamborn) submitted the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relating to parental rights.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, 
education, and care of their children is a fundamental right.
    ``Section 2. The parental right to direct education includes the 
right to choose, as an alternative to public education, private, 
religious, or home schools, and the right to make reasonable choices 
within public schools for one's child.
    ``Section 3. Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe 
these rights without demonstrating that its governmental interest as 
applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.
    ``Section 4. The parental rights guaranteed by this article shall 
not be denied or abridged on account of disability.''.
                                 <all>
```
Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Development Grants

## Technical Review Form for MissouriReviewer 1

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to High-Quality Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Development Grants

## Technical Review Form for MissouriReviewer 2

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to High-Quality Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

Top of Form

Top of Form

# Preschool Development Grants

## Development Grants

## Technical Review Form for MissouriReviewer 3

### A. Executive Summary

### B. Commitment to High-Quality Preschool Programs

### C. Ensuring Quality in Preschool Programs

### D. Expanding High-Quality Preschool Programs in Each High-Need Community

### E. Collaborating with Each Subgrantee and Ensuring Strong Partnerships

### F. Alignment within a Birth Through Third Grade Continuum

### G. Budget and Sustainability

### Competitive Preference Priorities

### Absolute Priority

### Grand Total

# _1479579434.unknown

# _1479579435.unknown

# _1479579433.unknown
#### Anne R. Satin, Respondent, v Sheldon B. Satin, Defendant, and Joan Satin et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 11, 1978 on reargument, which denied the cross motion to dismiss the sixth and seventh causes of action of the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action, reversed to the extent appealed from, to dismiss said sixth and seventh causes of action, on the law, without costs. The plaintiff alleges that she was prevailed upon to reduce a provision for support in a separation agreement and that the modification agreement was entered into on the basis of false and fraudulent representations made by the defendant former husband. The sixth and seventh causes of action allege conspiracy among the husband, his then second wife, and his corporation. There is no tort of civil conspiracy in and of itself. There must first be pleaded specific wrongful acts which might constitute an independent tort. *858
      *(Miller v Spitzer,*224 App Div 39, 41.) Here, the only such wrongful action is pleaded against the husband alone in the fourth and fifth causes. In any event, it is doubtful that there could here be a conspiracy between this individual and his own corporation. *(Bereswill v Yablon,*6 NY2d 301, 305.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00661-CR

Austin Ray Carpenter, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY 

NO. B-16-0348-SB, HONORABLE MARTIN (BROCK) JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due December 15, 2017. After 

multiple extensions and appointed counsel’s failure to file a brief, this Court abated the appeal 

for a hearing pursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Following the 

hearing, the trial court appointed new appellate counsel. On new counsel’s motion, the time for 

filing appellant’s brief was extended to September 14, 2018. In granting the extension, this 

Court advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted. Appellant’s counsel has now 

filed a second motion for extension (the eighth overall) requesting that the Court extend the time 

for filing appellant’s brief. We grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file 

a brief no later than November 16, 2018. No further extension of time will be granted and 

failure to comply with this order will result in the referral of this case to the trial court for a 

hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
2

It is ordered on October 17, 2018.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Do Not Publish
Specifications & Equipment Airframe Diameter

800mm

Main Blade Length

190mm

Main Rotor Diameter

416mm

Height

430mm

Flying Weight(without battery)

Approx. 2700g

APS-M Multicopter Control Unit Input Voltage

DC4.5V~8.4V

Operating Current Consumption

<250mA@ 4.8V

Operating Frequency

400Hz

Operating Temperature

-20° ~ 65°C(-4° ~ 149 °F)

Hovering Precision (Depending on Sate

Horizontal ±1m(3.28ft)

Vertical ±1m(3.28ft)

Highest Flight Speed

Horizontal 15m/sec

Vertical 6m/sec

Maximum Altitude Restriction

700m(2297ft) above the takeoff point

Maximum Angular Speed

Aileron/Elevator 115° /sec, Rudder 145° /sec

Maximum Tilting Angle

30 degrees

Supports External Peripherals

G2 / G3 Gimbal、OSD+FPV Video Transmitt

Supports Multicopter Configurations

4 rotors +, 4 rotors X, 6 rotors +, 6 rotors X

8 rotors +, 8 rotors X.
Dimension

49x34.3x20mm

PCU Power Control Unit Input Voltage

13.2V~25.2V

(4S~6S Li-Po)

Operating Frequency

500KHz

Dimension

62x35x26mm

Motor ESC Input Voltage

13.2V~25.2V

(4S~6S Li-Po)

Max Continuous Current

40A

Dimension

74.2x27x12.7mm

BL4213 Motor 370KV(RPM/V) Input Voltage

DC 22.2V

Max Continuous Current

25A

Max Continuous Power

550W

Stator Arms

12

Magnet Poles

14

Dimension / Weight

Φ4xΦ52x33mm / 185g
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      December 9, 2008 | /S/ ALAN      ROSSKAMM               |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                         | Alan      Rosskamm                   |
|                         | Chairman      of the Board           |
|                         | Interim      Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |                                 |
| Dated:      December 9, 2008 | /S/ ERIC M.      SPECTER             |
|                         | Eric      M. Specter                 |
|                         | Executive      Vice President        |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer         |

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-1179

___________

Patricia Louise Hyde, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Appeal from the

v. * United States Tax Court.

*

Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: June 28, 2012

Filed: July 2, 2012

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Louise Hyde appeals the tax court’s decision upholding the

1

Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination thatshe was liable for an income

tax deficiency and additions for tax year 2006, assessing her liabilities, and imposing

a 26 U.S.C. § 6673 penalty for asserting frivolous and groundless arguments. She

also appeals the tax court’s denial of her motion, under Tax Court Rule 162, to vacate

its decision.

The Honorable David Laro, United States Tax Court Judge.

1
After careful review, we agree with the tax court’s decision upholding Hyde’s

2006 liabilities. See Campbell v. Comm’r, 164 F.3d 1140, 1142 (8th Cir. 1999) (tax

court’s findings of fact are reviewed for clear error, and its legal conclusions are

reviewed de novo). We also find no abuse of discretion in the tax court’s imposition

of the section 6673 penalty, see May v. Comm’r, 752 F.2d 1301, 1304-05 (8th Cir.

1985) (standard of review), or in the tax court’s denial of her Rule 162 motion. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-15T16:41:07-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
227.7107-1 Architectural designs and data clauses for architect-engineer or construction contracts. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection and in 227.7107-2, use the clause at 252.227-7022, Government Rights (Unlimited), in solicitations and contracts for architect-engineer services and for construction involving architect-engineer services.
( b ) When the purpose of a contract for architect-engineer services, or for construction involving architect-engineer services, is to obtain a unique architectural design of a building, a monument, or construction of similar nature, which for artistic, aesthetic or other special reasons the Government does not want duplicated, the Government may acquire exclusive control of the data pertaining to the design by including the clause at 252.227-7023, Drawings and Other Data to Become Property of Government, in solicitations and contracts.
( c ) The Government shall obtain unlimited rights in shop drawings for construction. In solicitations and contracts calling for delivery of shop drawings, include the clause at 252.227-7033, Rights in Shop Drawings.