alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6566

GEORGE MAJOR DAVIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-02-242-2)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 6, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Major Davis, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Major Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2020075EN.01000201.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

6 March 2020

(2020/C 75/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1336 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4697 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87165 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6145 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0589 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 143,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4983 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,458 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 335,48 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3042 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8110 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,9209 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7103 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5213 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8089 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7858 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5630 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 351,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,8514 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8511 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5035 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 558,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7294 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,542 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,5058 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,640 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,2748 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9958 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,5860 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1336

JPY

Japanese yen

119,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4697

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87165

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6145

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0589

ISK

Iceland króna

143,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4983

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,458

HUF

Hungarian forint

335,48

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3042

RON

Romanian leu

4,8110

TRY

Turkish lira

6,9209

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7103

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5213

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8089

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7858

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5630

KRW

South Korean won

1 351,63

ZAR

South African rand

17,8514

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8511

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5035

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 558,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7294

PHP

Philippine peso

57,542

RUB

Russian rouble

77,5058

THB

Thai baht

35,640

BRL

Brazilian real

5,2748

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9958

INR

Indian rupee

83,5860

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
401.402 Policy. Requests for authority to deviate from the provisions of the FAR or the AGAR shall be submitted in writing as far in advance as the exigencies of the situation will permit. Each request for deviation shall contain the following: ( a ) A statement of the deviation desired, including identification of the specific paragraph number(s) of the FAR and AGAR;
( b ) The reason why the deviation is considered necessary or would be in the best interest of the Government;
( c ) If applicable, the name of the contractor and identification of the contract affected;
( d ) A statement as to whether the deviation has been requested previously and, if so, circumstances of the previous request;
( e ) A description of the intended effect of the deviation;
( f ) A statement of the period of time for which the deviation is needed; and
( g ) Any pertinent background information which will contribute to a full understanding of the desired deviation.
EXHIBIT 99 (i)8


                                                                    June 1, 2000


For Release:   Immediately

   CENTRAL HUDSON'S SHARE OF NINE MILE UNIT 2 PLANT TO BE INCLUDED IN AUCTION

       Central  Hudson Gas & Electric  Corporation's  9 percent  interest in the
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 nuclear plant will be included  within the auction of the
facility  announced today.  Central Hudson joined New York State Electric & Gas,
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation,  and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation in
announcing the auction of their respective  shares of the plant.  Niagara Mohawk
also announced  that it will auction the Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Plant,  which it
owns exclusively.

       The  decision to auction the plants is  consistent  with a New York State
Public Service  Commission order urging the owners to determine the market value
of the facilities through an open, competitive process. Bids are scheduled to be
due  within  the next two  moths.  The  closing  of any sale will be  subject to
regulatory approval.

       Nine Mile Point 2, a  1,148-megawatt  boiling-water  reactor,  is jointly
owned by Central  Hudson (9 percent),  NYSEG (18  percent),  Niagara  Mohawk (41
percent),  RG&E (14 percent) and the Long Island Power  Authority  (18 percent).
Niagara  Mohawk  operates  both  plants.  LIPA is not  currently  including  its
ownership interest in Nine Mile Point Unit 2 in the auction sale.

       In June 1999,  Niagara  Mohawk and NYSEG  announced that they had reached
agreement to sell their  interests  in units 1 and 2 to AmerGen  Energy Co. That
agreement was mutually terminated by the three parties.

       The selling owners have retained J.P.  Morgan and Navigant  Consulting to
manage the auction process. For further  information,  contact either Roger Wood
at  J.P.  Morgan  (212-  648-3530)  or  Lisa  Quilici  at  Navigant   Consulting
(781-564-9744).

                                     # # #
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-10446, 333-775261, 333-118911 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of AMCORE Financial, Inc. and the effectiveness of AMCORE Financial, Inc.’s internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 

March 14, 2008
#### 339.101 Policy

In addition to the regulatory guidance in Federal Acquisition Regulation part 39, contracting officers shall collaborate with the requiring activity to ensure information technology (IT) acquisitions for supplies, services, and systems meet the requirements established by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Exhibit 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Home Director, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, DARYL STEMM, the Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: June 6, 2007

/s/ Daryl Stemm
------------------------------
Daryl Stemm,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#  Preschool Development Grants

# FY2014 Final Results

**Preschool Development Grants--Development Grants**

**Preschool Development Grants--Expansion Grants**

*Note: Applications are ranked in order of their average raw score and are presented in two separate slates for Absolute Priority Two and Absolute Priority Three.*

**Absolute Priority Two (RTT-ELC States)**

**Absolute Priority Three (Non RTT-ELC States)**

* States recommended for funding. 

� Absolute Priority 2: Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge States. To meet this priority, an applicant must have received an award under a Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge competition.

� Absolute Priority 3: Non-Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge States with More Robust State Preschool Programs. To meet this priority, the applicant must not have received an award under a Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge competition and serve 10 percent or more of four-year-old children in a State Preschool Program.

1

3
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT




     This amendment to License and Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) between Henry Schein,
Inc. (“HSI”) and Biolase Technology, Inc (“Biolase”) is entered into as of September 10, 2009 (the
“Amendment”).



     WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Agreement dated August 8, 2006, as subsequently amended
(the “Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to make certain amendments to the Agreement; and



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions contained herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree that the following amendments, modifications or other changes are made to the
Agreement:




	 	1.	 	In Section 4.2 of the Agreement the phrase “(i) such warranties shall
not be for a term of longer than **** from **** ” shall be amended and restated as
follows “(i) such warranties shall be for a term of **** from **** ;
provided however, such warranties **** from **** .”
	 
	 	2.	 	The parties hereby agree that to the extent there is any inconsistency
in any terms or conditions set forth in the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms
and conditions of this Amendment shall control. Additionally, the parties hereby
agree that all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect, except as modified by this Amendment. Capitalized terms used
herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.





[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]






 




			
	****	 	Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked with four asterisks, has
been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




 









 










     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	HENRY SCHEIN, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Brian S. Watson
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Brian S. Watson 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President, Strategic and Business Planning 	 
	 
	 	BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ David M. Mulder
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	David M. Mulder 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 





 




			
	****	 	Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked with four asterisks, has
been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2020163EN.01000201.xml

| 12.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 May 2020

(2020/C 163/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0824 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4595 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87875 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5998 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0519 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 158,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,0460 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,600 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 349,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5591 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8303 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,6596 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6709 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5136 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3893 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7808 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5335 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 325,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,9600 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6783 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5650 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 202,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6911 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,527 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 79,6981 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,837 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2691 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,9201 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,0960 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0824

JPY

Japanese yen

116,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4595

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87875

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5998

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0519

ISK

Iceland króna

158,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,0460

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,600

HUF

Hungarian forint

349,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5591

RON

Romanian leu

4,8303

TRY

Turkish lira

7,6596

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6709

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5136

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3893

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7808

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5335

KRW

South Korean won

1 325,57

ZAR

South African rand

19,9600

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6783

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5650

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 202,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6911

PHP

Philippine peso

54,527

RUB

Russian rouble

79,6981

THB

Thai baht

34,837

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2691

MXN

Mexican peso

25,9201

INR

Indian rupee

82,0960

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 2815.404-2 Data to support proposal analysis.

All requests for field pricing support shall be made by the contracting officer directly to the cognizant audit agency. In accordance with Attorney General Order 1931-94, a copy of the request for such services shall be sent to the OIG at the time it is mailed to the cognizant audit agency. A copy of each report received shall also be sent to the OIG. Requests for other audit assistance may be made to the Assistant Inspector General for Audits.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>                                                           EXHIBIT 12
CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
<CAPTION>                                   1998          Year Ended December 31,            
                                      3 Mos   6 Mos    12 Mos   1997    1996     1995    1994
                                      Ended   Ended    Ended  
                                      June 30 June 30  June 30 
<S>                                   <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>     <C>        <C>
   Earnings:                                                                     
A. Net Income                     $10,041  $29,208  $ 52,347  $ 55,086  $ 56,082 $ 52,722   $ 50,929
B.  Federal Income Tax              5,215   15,773    24,357    26,237    31,068   28,687     26,806
C.  Earnings before Income Taxes   15,256   44,981    76,704    81,323    87,150   81,409     77,735
D.  Total Fixed Charges <FN1>       6,989   13,737    27,368    27,148    27,231   30,433     32,679
E.  Total Earnings                $22,245  $58,718  $104,072  $108,471  $114,381 $111,842   $110,414
     Preferred Dividend Requirements:
F.  Allowance for Preferred Stock
     Dividends Under IRC Sec 247  $   807  $ 1,614  $  3,230   $  3,230 $  3,230 $  4,903   $  5,127
G.  Less Allowable Dividend Deduction  32       64       127        127      127      528        528
H.  Net Subject to Gross-up           775    1,550     3,103      3,103    3,103    4,375      4,599
I.  Ratio of Earnings before Income
     Taxes to Net Income (C/A)      1.519    1.540     1.465      1.476    1.554    1.544      1.526
J.  Pref. Dividend (Pre-tax) (HxI)  1,177    2,387     4,546      4,580    4,822    6,755      7,018
K.  Plus Allowable Dividend Deduction  32       64       127        127      127      528        528
L.  Preferred Dividend Factor       1,209    2,451     4,673      4,707    4,949    7,283      7,546
M.  Fixed Charges (D)               6,989   13,737    27,368     27,148   27,231   30,433     32,679
N.  Total Fixed Charges
     and Preferred Dividends      $ 8,198  $16,188  $ 32,041   $ 31,855 $ 32,180 $ 37,716   $ 40,225
O.  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
     Charges (E/D)                   3.18     4.27      3.80       4.00     4.20     3.68       3.38
P.  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
     and Preferred Dividends (E/N)   2.71     3.63      3.25       3.41     3.55     2.97       2.74
    <FN1> Includes a portion of rent expense deemed to be representive of the interest factor.
</TABLE>
</PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11197 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BRENSON STOVALL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-175-1 No. 4:99-M-157-ALL

-------------------- August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Brenson Stovall appeals the district court's denial of his
pro se Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial. The district court denied the motion because Stovall had failed to demonstrate the existence of newly discovered evidence meriting a new trial. Stovall does not argue on appeal that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion for new trial, and he has therefore abandoned the only issue properly before this court on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.No. 00-11197 -2- 1993). Stovall instead argues for the first time on appeal that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Inasmuch as this claim was not raised in the district court, this court will not consider it. See United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). In light of the abandonment of the only issue that could be raised on appeal, this appeal is frivolous; it is therefore DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

                - IRS FY 2023-2025 Program Administration Manual: MS Word (1M)
                - International Resource Information System (IRIS) -- a performance reporting system and searchable database for 14 international education programs 
                - Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
                - International and Foreign Language Education Resources Open Educational Resources (OER) Commons Group
                - OPE - Other Applicant and Grantee Resources

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 2828.307 Insurance under cost-reimbursements contracts.