alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

AMCORE Financial, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement(No. 33-10446) on Form S-8 of AMCORE Financial, Inc. of our reports dated March 2, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of AMCORE Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 10, 2005
-  Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Advisory Board  **Members**    - Dr.  Lezli Baskerville, President & CEO      National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education      Term expires upon tenure of position of President of the National Association  for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education
  - Dr.  David Hall, President      University of the Virgin Islands      Appointed 4/20/2022      Term expires 9/30/2024      Representative of a public HBCU
  - Mr.  Lodriguez Murray, Senior Vice President for Public Policy and Government Affairs      United Negro College Fund       Appointed 11/27/2017       Term expires upon tenure of position of Dr. Michael Lomax as President of the  United Negro College Fund
  - Dr.  David Sheppard, Chief Legal Officer & Chief of Staff      Thurgood Marshall College Fund      Appointed 3/7/2019      Term expires upon tenure of position of Harry L. Williams as President  of the Thurgood Marshall College Fund
  - Colonel Alexander Conyers (Retired), President   South Carolina State University  Appointed 4/20/2022  Term expires 9/30/2024  Representative of a public HBCU
  - Dr. C. Reynold Verret, President  Xavier University of Louisiana  Appointed 4/20/2022  Term expires 9/30/2024  Representative of a private HBCU
  - Dr. Dwight J. Fennell, Sr., President  Texas College  Appointed 4/20/2022  Term expires 9/30/2024  Representative of a private HBCU
  - Dr. Quinton T. Ross, Jr., President  Alabama State University  Appointed 4/20/2022  Term expires 9/30/2024  Representative of a public HBCU
  - Dr. Valerie Montgomery Rice, President & CEO  Morehouse School of Medicine  Appointed 4/20/2022  Term expires 9/30/2024  Representative of a private HBCU
  - Dr. Dietra Trent, Executive Director  White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities  Term expires upon tenure of position Executive Director of the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities  Institutional Service Home           Last Modified: 09/20/2023
**Exhibit 32.5**
**Certifications**
I, Stephen M. Weinberg, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Centex Development Company,L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: February 9, 2004   /s/ STEPHEN M. WEINBERGStephen M. Weinberg  Chief Executive Officer of 3333 Development Corporation,General Partner of Centex Development Company, L.P.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 14, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21

- 1197 Lower Tribunal No. F16

- 567B

________________



### Osmany Haro , Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, William Altfield , Judge. Osmany Haro, in proper person

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General , for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ , C.J., and HENDON, and BOKOR , JJ. FERNANDEZ, C. J

. Osmany Haro appeals the trial court order denying his motion for post

conviction relief base d on ineffective assistance of counsel. Haro claims that2 his lawyer was ineffective by failing to obtain jail credit for 113 days that Haro spent in custody in Colorado fighting extradition to Florida. The trial court denied the motion finding that Flori da Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 requires that motions for jail credit be filed within one year from the time that the judgment and sentence became final. According to the trial court, Haro pleaded guilty and was sentenced on May 3, 2018, and he filed his motion for post

- conviction relief on December 9, 2019,
In Gisi v. State , 135 So. 3d 493, 495 (Fla. 2 d DCA 2014), our sister court concluded that “[a] lthough the court commentary to rule 3.801 states that ‘ [a]ll jail credit issues must be handled pursuant to this rule, ’ the rule does not apply to claims of jail credit for the time a defendant was incarcerated outside the state while awaiting sentencing. ” This is because the rule refers to Florida Statute Section 921.161 (2012), and the Florida Supreme Court held that jail credit awarded pursuant to the statute applies only to Florida county jail time. See Kronz v. State , 462 So. 2d 450 , 451 (Fla. 1985) (“[W] e conclude that section 921.161(1) requires the trial judge to give credit only for time served in Florida county jails pending disposition of criminal charges. ”)3 Because the motion for post

- conviction relief was timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Cr iminal Procedure 3.850, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2021- FY 2025

Projected five-year funding: $471,500,000Projected annual funding: $94,300,000Total number of awards:100Average annual award: $943,000

## FY 2016- FY2020

Total five-year funding: $456,488,131Average annual funding: $91,297,626Total number of awards:91Average annual award: $1,003,271,618

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### Ann K. Gallagher, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edith A. Gallagher, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

In a wrongful death action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 12, 1962, which on reargument granted plaintiff’s motion to open her default in failing to serve a complaint within the time prescribed (Civ. Prac. Act, § 257) and extended her time to serve the complaint. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. This action was commenced by the service of a summons on November 1, 1958. The defendant on November 6, 1958 entered a general appearance and demanded a copy of the complaint. In April, 1961, almost two and one-half years after service of the summons, plaintiff’s attorney served a complaint upon defendant which was promptly returned by defendant as untimely. Thereafter, plaintiff moved to open the default and for an enlargement of time within which to serve the complaint. The explanation of plaintiff’s counsel for the delay was that, subsequent to receipt of the notice of appearance, the file of the case became lodged behind the file drawer and was not discovered until said drawer was being completely changed for a replacement drawer. In our opinion, such explanation is insufficient to excuse the unreasonable delay in serving the complaint, and there was no basis for the exercise of discretion to grant the motion to open plaintiff’s default *(Nocella*v. *City of New York,*18 A D 2d 1015). The excuse that the file was misplaced inadvertently is rejected as inadequate (cf. *Cronin*v. *City of New York,*18 A D 2d 995; *Burke*v. *City of New York,*18 A D 2d 898). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
41.601 Utility services forms. ( a ) If acquiring utility services under other than an areawide contract, a purchase order, or an interagency agreement, the Standard Form (SF) 33, Solicitation, Offer and Award; SF 26, Award/Contract; or SF 1447, Solicitation/Contract, shall be used.
( b ) The contracting officer shall incorporate the applicable rate schedule in each contract, purchase order or modification.
#### In the Matter of Raymond E. Diana, Petitioner, v State Tax Commission, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Tax Commission which denied petitioner’s application for redetermination of a deficiency or for refund of unincorporated business tax under article 23 of the Tax Law for the years 1968, 1969 and 1970. The petitioner served as a consultant, representative and negotiator in the field of labor relations between labor organizations of public employees and their governmental employers during the years 1968, 1969 and 1970. His services included research, preparation of briefs, statements and news releases and testimony as an expert witness in court and in labor mediation, arbitration and fact-finding proceedings. He contends that his work constituted a profession and he is, therefore, not subject to the unincorporated business tax under subdivision (c) of section *961703 of the Tax Law. The Tax Commission found that petitioner, while acting as a labor consultant, was an advocate for the causes of his principles and not an impartial mediator or arbitrator; that he was unlicensed; that his skills and knowledge of labor relations were gained from his prior occupation as Deputy Commissioner of Labor for New York City from 1957 to 1965; and that he has lectured on labor relations in public service in colleges and helped to evolve the present New York City Labor Relations System. The commission concluded that claimant’s activities, while requiring special knowledge and experience, dealt primarily with the conduct of business itself on behalf of his principals rather than the application of a separately developed art or science and did not constitute the practice of a profession. The burden of proof in establishing an exemption from taxes imposed on unincorporated businesses is upon the taxpayer (see Tax Law, § 689, subd [e]). The judicial function of review is limited. If there are any facts or reasonable inferences from the facts to sustain it, the court must confirm the Tax Commission’s determination. A determination will not be disturbed by the court unless shown to be erroneous, arbitrary or capricious *(Matter of Liberman v Gallman,*41 NY2d 774). In *People ex rel. Tower v State Tax Comm.*(282 NY 407) the Court of Appeals set down the test as to what constitutes a profession within the meaning of the unincorporated business tax statute. The principles laid down there require that the services rendered entail knowledge of an advanced type in a given field of science or learning gained by a prolonged course of specialized instruction or study. To be considered, as well, is whether even in the instance of an acknowledged professional his activities constitute the practice of a profession or are purely a commercial or business enterprise. In conformity with these tests we conclude that the commission’s findings are rational and cannot be disturbed. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
# C_2016386EN.01000801.xml

| 20.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 October 2016

(2016/C 386/06)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0979 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4409 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89338 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6980 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0854 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9585 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,08 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3180 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5020 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3724 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4298 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4361 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5175 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5232 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5228 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 233,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2650 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3963 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 267,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5971 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,692 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,6223 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,317 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5063 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4850 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,1890 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0979

JPY

Japanese yen

113,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4409

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89338

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6980

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0854

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9585

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,08

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3180

RON

Romanian leu

4,5020

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3724

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4298

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4361

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5175

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5232

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5228

KRW

South Korean won

1 233,88

ZAR

South African rand

15,2650

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3963

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 267,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5971

PHP

Philippine peso

52,692

RUB

Russian rouble

68,6223

THB

Thai baht

38,317

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5063

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4850

INR

Indian rupee

73,1890

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
32.1009 Title. ( a ) Since the clause at 52.232-32, Performance-Based Payments, gives the Government title to the property described in paragraph (f) of the clause, the contracting officer shall ensure that the Government title is not compromised by other encumbrances. Ordinarily, the contracting officer, in the absence of reason to believe otherwise, may rely upon the contractor's certification contained in the payment request.
( b ) If the contracting officer becomes aware of any arrangement or condition that would impair the Government's title to the property affected by the Performance-Based Payments clause, the contracting officer shall require additional protective provisions.
( c ) The existence of any such encumbrance is a violation of the contractor's obligations under the contract, and the contracting officer may, if necessary, suspend or reduce payments under the terms of the Performance-Based Payments clause covering failure to comply with a material requirement of the contract. In addition, if the contractor fails to disclose an existing encumbrance in the certification, the contracting officer should consult with legal counsel concerning possible violation of 31 U.S.C. 3729, the False Claims Act.
[64 FR 10540, Mar. 4, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 73222, Dec. 26, 2007]
#### 252.227-7029 [Reserved]
#### 414.201-6 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision 452.214-70, Award by Lot, when multiple items are segregated into clearly identifiable lots and the contracting officer wants to reserve the right to award by item within a lot, if award in that manner would be advantageous to the Government.
Exhibit 31.2

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Patrick L. Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of YDI
Wireless, Inc., certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of YDI Wireless, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: February 20, 2004                    /s/ Patrick L. Milton
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                       Patrick L. Milton
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer