alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4.102 Contractor's signature. ( a ) *Individuals.* A contract with an individual shall be signed by that individual. A contract with an individual doing business as a firm shall be signed by that individual, and the signature shall be followed by the individual's typed, stamped, or printed name and the words “, an individual doing business as ______________________” [*insert name of firm*].
( b ) *Partnerships.* A contract with a partnership shall be signed in the partnership name. Before signing for the Government, the contracting officer shall obtain a list of all partners and ensure that the individual(s) signing for the partnership have authority to bind the partnership.
( c ) *Corporations.* A contract with a corporation shall be signed in the corporate name, followed by the word “by” and the signature and title of the person authorized to sign. The contracting officer shall ensure that the person signing for the corporation has authority to bind the corporation.
( d ) *Joint venturers.* A contract with joint venturers may involve any combination of individuals, partnerships, or corporations. The contract shall be signed by each participant in the joint venture in the manner prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section for each type of participant. When a corporation is participating, the contracting officer shall verify that the corporation is authorized to participate in the joint venture.
( e ) *Agents.* When an agent is to sign the contract, other than as stated in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, the agent's authorization to bind the principal must be established by evidence satisfactory to the contracting officer.
[48 FR 42113, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 235, Jan. 2, 1997; 84 FR 19840, May 6, 2019]
#### In the Matter of Eugene Jacobson, Respondent, v. Trim-Slide, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants for a stay, pending determination of their motion, returnable May 31, 1962, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth E. Edge, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth E. Edge    
|Kenneth E. Edge        
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 15, 2006         



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32(a)





PHARMOS CORPORATION


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the annual report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, ROBERT F. JOHNSTON, Executive Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: February 17, 2012





By: /s/ Robert F. Johnston











In connection with the annual report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, S. COLIN NEILL, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: February 17, 2012





By: /s/ S. Colin Neill








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by Pharmos Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mildred Varady, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jerome Varady, Deceased, Respondent, v Pelham Bay General Hospital et al., Appellants.

In a medical malpractice action, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 6, 1978, which granted plaintiff’s motion to serve an amended complaint and bill of particulars. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances of this case, and in the absence of prejudice to defendants, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion. Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Martuscello and Mangano, JJ., concur.
# C_2019063EN.01000301.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 February 2019

(2019/C 63/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1260 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4612 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87938 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4813 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1340 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 134,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,709 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 318,21 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3307 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7407 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,9322 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5836 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4959 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8370 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6432 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5293 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 269,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9011 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6236 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4080 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 924,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5997 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,036 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,0816 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,210 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1852 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7650 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,3610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1260

JPY

Japanese yen

124,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4612

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87938

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4813

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1340

ISK

Iceland króna

134,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,709

HUF

Hungarian forint

318,21

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3307

RON

Romanian leu

4,7407

TRY

Turkish lira

5,9322

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5836

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4959

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8370

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6432

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5293

KRW

South Korean won

1 269,32

ZAR

South African rand

15,9011

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6236

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4080

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 924,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5997

PHP

Philippine peso

59,036

RUB

Russian rouble

75,0816

THB

Thai baht

35,210

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1852

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7650

INR

Indian rupee

80,3610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
1

From: Coomes, Brandon [mailto:Brandon.Coomes@centuryaluminum.com] Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 3:47 PM To: Hakos, Matthew Cc: Green, David A.; Putney, David; Coomes, Jamie; 'Courtney, Scott'; Owens, Matt; Wiggins, Rick Subject: RE: Bag Leak Detection System Request Matt, Please see the completed table below. Please let us know if you have any more questions. 

Facility Name Sub-Category 

Paste Plant Anode Bake Furnace 

# of Paste 

Plant # of Stacks 

# of Stacks 

with existing 

BLDS 

# of Furnaces # of Stacks 

Alumax - Mt. Holly 

CWPB1 Yes (1) 1 1 Yes (1) 1 

Century Aluminum - Sebree 

CWPB1 Yes (1) 1 0 Yes (1) 3 

Century Aluminum of WV 

CWPB2 Yes (1) 1 0 Yes (1) 28 

Century Aluminum of KY** 

CWPB3 Yes (1) 2 1 Yes (1) 1 

*Mt. Holly’s Bake Furnace Scrubber has a common stack, but a BLD unit is installed in the outlet of each of the 8 scrubber com

 **Century Aluminum of KY (Hawesville, KY Plant): 

 Potlines 1-4 do not have BLD because it is a wet scrubber system.  Potline 5 has 6 baghouse modules each with BLD and 1 common exhaust stack with a particulate counter .  Carbon Bake scrubber has 4 baghouse modules each with BLD and 1 common stack with a particulate counter. 

 Paste Plant Pitch Fume Scrubber – Has no BLD 
2

Brandon Coomes Environmental Engineer, Sebree9404 State Route 2096 Robards, KY 42452 270.521.7454 (Century Aluminum Sebree, LLC) 270.860.0057 (Mobile) brandon.coomes@centuryaluminum.comFrom: Hakos, Matthew [mailto:mhakos@rti.org] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:58 AM To: Coomes, Brandon; Coomes, Jamie Cc: Green, David A.; Putney, David Subject: Bag Leak Detection System Request Importance: HighJamie and Brandon, I am working with EPA regarding the bag leak detection system requirements for Primary Aluminum. Specifically, we are seeking regarding the number of stacks associated with paste plants and anode bake furnaces. Could you please provide the number of splant and anode bake furnace and indicate whether or not BLDS is (or is not) already installed. Please use the table below. 

Facility Name Sub-Category 

Paste Plant Anode Bake Furnace 

# of Paste 

Plant # of Stacks 

# of Stacks 

with existing 

BLDS 

# of Furnaces # of Stacks 

Alumax - Mt. Holly 

CWPB1 Yes (1) Yes (1)

Century Aluminum - Sebree 

CWPB1 Yes (1) Yes (1)

Century Aluminum of WV 

CWPB2 Yes (1) Yes (1)

Century Aluminum of KY 

CWPB3 Yes (1) Yes (1)
3

Thank you in advance for your assistance, Matt Hakos RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (919) 541-6608 (919) 541-7155 (fax)
August 16, 1971 

Honorable Ted Butler 

Criminal District Attorney 

Bexar County Courthouse 

San Antonio, Texas 78204 

Dear Mr. Butler: 

Opinion No. M-936 

Re: Authority of the Commissioners 

Court of Bexar County to make 

payments to the Industrial Development Commission of Metropolitan Bexar County. 

You have requested our opinion on whether the Commissioners Court 

of Bexar County may make a grant to the Industrial Development Commission 

of Metropolitan Bexar County, a non-profit corporation, for the purpose of 

promoting industrial development in Bexar County. 

The Commissioners Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and has 

only such powers as are conferred upon it by the statutes and Constitution of 

this State, whether by express terms or by necessary implication. Section 

18, Article V, Constitution of Texas; Article 2351, Vernon’s Civil Statutes; 

Bland v. Orr, 90 Tex. 492, 39 S. W. 558 (1897); Mills v. Lampasas County, 

90 Tex. 603, 40 S. W. 403 (1897); Anderson v. Wood, 137 Tex. 201, 152 S. W. 2d 

1084 (1941); Canales v. Laughlin, 147 Tex. 169, 214 S. W. 2d 451 (1948); Starr 

County v. Guerra, 297 S. W. 2d 379 (Tex. Civ. App. 1956); Van Rosenberg v. 

Lovett, 173 S. W. 508 (Tex. Civ. App. 1915, error ref. ); Attorney General 

Opinion No. C-350 (1964. ) 

Section 1 of Article 2352d, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, applicable to Bexar 

County, authorized the Commissioners Court to expend money for the purpose 

of advertising and promoting the growth and development of the county. However, before such expenditure may be made it must first be approved by a 

majority vote of the qualifying taxpaying voters of the county voting at an election 

called for such purpose. Attorney General Opinions R-2136 (1950). V-1238 

(1951) and C-39 (1963. ) It was held in these opinions that in the absence of 

such election, expenditures of county funds for purposes similar to those stated 

in your request may not be made. 

-4563- 
Honorable Ted Butler, page 2 (M-936) 

You state in your request that no election pursuant to the provisions 

of Article 2352d, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, has been held in Bexar County, 

and we know of no other provision in the statutes of this State authorizing 

such expenditure. We are therefore in agreement with you that the Commissioners Court of Bexar County is not authorized to expend moneys for 

the purpose outlined in your request. 

SUMMARY 

Since no election has been held in Bexar County 

pursuant to the provisions of Article 2352d. Vernon’s Civil 

Statutes, the Commissioners Court is not authorized to expend money for the purpose of making a grant to a non-profit 

corporation to promote industrial development in Bexar 

county. 

y General of Texas 

Prepared by John Reeves 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman 

Robert Lemens 

Gordon Cass 

Melvin Corley 

Lewis A. Jones 

MEADE F. GRIFFIN 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRED WALKER 

Executive Assistant 

NOLA WHITE 

First Assistant 

‘4564-
#### 27.204-2 Use of patented technology under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).

Article 31 of Annex 1C, Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, to GATT (Uruguay Round) addresses situations where the law of a member country allows for use of a patent without authorization, including use by the Government. Article 20.40 of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement preserves parties' rights under Article 31.

[72 FR 63049, Nov. 7, 2007, as amended at 87 FR 73893, Dec. 1, 2022]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7261

FREDDY LUDWIG WAMBACH, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:09-cv-00425-CMH-IDD) 

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and 

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Freddy Ludwig Wambach, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Freddy Ludwig Wambach seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We 

have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wambach 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
H. Con. Res. 93 Agreed to March 6, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the two Houses of Congress assemble in the Hall of 

the House of Representatives on Thursday, March 7, 2024, at 9 

p.m., for the purpose of receiving such communication as the President of the United States shall be pleased to make to them. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
\ )

( \ \ .I ' I

SECTION 1 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
TYPE OF KILN: Iron Ore Pellitizing NOMINAL BURNERRATING: -J ··400MM Bu_t/hr

...·- FUEL OPTIONS: Pulverized coal Pulverized coke Natural gas DESIGN PULVERIZED FUEL INPUT: 7tons/hour DESIGN CONVEYING AIR FLOW: 14,000 acfm CONVEYING AIR TEMPERAUTURE: 170°F PRESSURE LOSS ON P.F. AT DESIGN: 14 inches w.c. P.F. GRIND DEFINATION: 80% 200mesh DESIGN NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION: 7,250 scfm NATURAL GAS LHV: 920 Btu/scf PRESSURE LOSS ON GAS AT DESIGN: 20 psig DESIGN IGNITION AIR CONSUMPTION: 1,385 scfm PRESSURE LOSS OF IGNITION AIR 5psig AT DESIGN #2 DESIGN COOLING AIRFLOW {GAS FIRING): 2,500 scfm PRESSURE LOSS OF COOLING AIR AT DESIGN: 0.5 inches w.c. ELECTRICS: Line: 460/3/60 Control: 120/l/60 ELEVATION: Sealevel LOCATION: Indoors INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: NotApplicable C620 Page 4
#### 3001.601 General.

DHS Delegation Number 0200.1, Delegation to the Directorate of Management, delegates authority from the Secretary to the Under Secretary of Management to manage the acquisition function. DHS Delegation 0700, Delegation to the Chief Procurement Officer for Acquisition and Financial Assistance Management, delegates this authority from the Under Secretary of Management to the Chief Procurement Officer.
3403.905 Procedures for investigating complaints. ( c ) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the agency head's designee for purposes of FAR 3.905.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6451

LARRY DARNELL HILL, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIEUTENANT EUGENE SINGLETON; LYNWOOD CARLTON, Nurse; JAMES 

KELLER, Officer; JAWANDA BURCHETT, Officer; DEXTER KORNEGAY, 

Counselor; JAMES PYATT, Officer; UNKNOWN SEGREGATION REVIEW 

OFFICIAL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03166-BO)

Submitted: March 16, 2022 Decided: April 4, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Darnell Hill, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-6451 Doc: 22 Filed: 04/04/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Darnell Hill, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to exhaust available administrative 

remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s order. Hill v. Singleton, No. 5:17-ct-03166-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 

27, 2020). We deny Hill’s motion for appointment of counsel and deny as moot his

renewed motion for bail or release pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 20-6451 Doc: 22 Filed: 04/04/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### 3033.102-90 Protests on classified solicitations (OSA).

To ensure that classified information is protected and appropriate security measures are coordinated as required, protests involving classified solicitations issued by the Office of Selective Acquisitions (OSA) shall be submitted directly to the contracting officer for further transmission to the GAO, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or for internal resolution in the case of agency protests. Specific instructions will be provided in Section L of the solicitation.
# C_2019313EN.01000201.xml

| 17.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 September 2019

(2019/C 313/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1031 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4670 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88510 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6703 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0932 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9043 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,882 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 331,92 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3241 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7348 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3041 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6054 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4619 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6266 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7324 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5158 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 306,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1498 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7957 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3945 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 487,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6088 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,692 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,6403 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,672 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5138 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4298 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,9825 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1031

JPY

Japanese yen

118,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4670

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88510

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6703

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0932

ISK

Iceland króna

136,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9043

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,882

HUF

Hungarian forint

331,92

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3241

RON

Romanian leu

4,7348

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3041

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6054

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4619

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6266

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7324

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5158

KRW

South Korean won

1 306,13

ZAR

South African rand

16,1498

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7957

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3945

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 487,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6088

PHP

Philippine peso

57,692

RUB

Russian rouble

70,6403

THB

Thai baht

33,672

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5138

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4298

INR

Indian rupee

78,9825

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---