alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.1 - Restated Certificate of Incorporation

EXHIBIT 3.1

                   CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
              RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                     BURR-BROWN CORPORATION


       The   undersigned,  being  the  Chairman  and   Secretary,
respectively, of Burr-Brown Corporation, a corporation  organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, does hereby
certify that:

      1.    The first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the Restated
Certificate  of Incorporation of this corporation is  amended  to
read in its entirety as follows:

           `FOURTH:  The Corporation shall be authorized to issue
     two   classes   of   shares  of  stock  to  be   designated,
     respectively,  "Preferred Stock" and  "Common  Stock."   The
     total  number  of  shares which the Corporation  shall  have
     authority  to  issue is Eighty-Two Million (82,000,000)  and
     the  aggregate par value of all shares of stock that are  to
     have  a  par  value shall be Eight Hundred  Twenty  Thousand
     Dollars ($820,000).  The total number of shares of Preferred
     Stock shall be Two Million (2,000,000) and the par value  of
     each  share  of  such class shall be One Cent  ($.01).   The
     total  number  of  shares of Common Stock  shall  be  Eighty
     Million (80,000,000) and the par value of each share of such
     class shall be One Cent ($.01)."


     2.   Said Amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law, by approval of the Board of Directors of the corporation and
by  the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of
the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

      IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, Burr-Brown Corporation has caused this
Certificate  of  Amendment  to be  signed  by  its  Chairman  and
attested by its Secretary this 15th day of May, 1996.


                              BURR-BROWN CORPORATION

                              By:       THOMAS R. BROWN, JR.
                                   Thomas R. Brown, Jr.

Attest:
JILL H. RICE
Jill H. Rice, Secretary
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

At the end of the project period, grantees must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c).

FIPSE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6207
BOBBY RAY ROBERTS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-00813-7) Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 16, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Ray Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bobby Ray Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Roberts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 47-2 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1389
Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 47-2 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1390
February 11, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID J. POWERS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00732-CV V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, STEPHANIE A. BREWSTER, JOYCE 

A. GREEN, MICHAEL A. MCNAIR AND CHAD WALL, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on May 21, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, David J. Powers.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
303.101-3 Agency regulations. ( a ) ( 3 ) The HHS Standards of Conduct are prescribed in 45 CFR part 73.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

I, David R. Brown, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this AmendmentNo. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of National Mercantile Bancorp;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.  The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | January 10, 2007        |   | /s/  DAVID R. BROWN |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | David R. Brown          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000762129
<NAME> CILCORP INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      867,680
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    179,232
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         187,733
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        41,984
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,276,629
<COMMON>                                       192,567
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            164,589
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 357,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,000
<PREFERRED>                                     44,120
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           298,567
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              45,207
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  37,900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,827
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   468
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 469,384
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,276,629
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      934,831
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            14,956
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     864,279
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     879,235
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         55,596
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 745
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  54,851
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        22,780
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,071
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,396
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   29,675
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        25,112
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       17,237
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          59,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.17
        

</TABLE>
exv10w3









Exhibit 10.3




DESCRIPTION OF FISCAL 2010 BONUS ARRANGEMENT WITH KIMBERLY TILL




On November 2, 2009, the Compensation Committee and Independent Directors approved performance
metrics for fiscal year 2010 applicable to the $600,000 target incentive bonus to which Kimberly
Till, President and Chief Executive Officer, is contractually entitled if the metrics are achieved.
64% of Ms. Till’s bonus will be based upon achievement of operating income, measured and payable
as provided in the Company’s Corporate Bonus Plan. The remainder of her bonus will be paid upon
achievement of three management objectives, with the degree of achievement to be determined by the
Compensation Committee in its discretion. Each management objective, if fully achieved, would
result in a payout of 12% of Ms. Till’s target bonus. The management objectives relate to strengthening client relationships and sales, bringing new products to market, and building a strong management team.
DART is an easy green way to get to SMU and avoid all the gas prices, traffic and congestion in the area.  DART day passes are just $5.00 and a trip-planning tool is available on their website (www.dart.org) to help you plan your trip to Mockingbird Station. 

Once at Mockingbird Station use the free SMU Express Shuttle 768 http://www.dart.org/riding/mustangexpress.asp picks up from the bus loading area there, every 15 minutes and drops off on the north end of Bishop Blvd at SMU or on Binkley Ave, just a few yards away from many popular SMU destinations.  All of the SMU Express 768 stops are referenced as small red bus icons on the attached campus map. 

The 743 Museum Shuttle http://www.dart.org/rideralerts/fullra.asp?id=1731   is another option if plans include a visit to the Meadows Museum or Bush Presidential Center locations. The shuttle runs every 20 minutes when the museums are open and stops are conveniently located near the buildings. 

Bus Route 521 is a great way to get to campus from City Place areas or Uptown

•Two buses on route until 9am daily. After 9am one bus runs every hour on the 45 minute of the hour.  

•On Saturday there is only southbound service route to City Place. 

•Visit 521 Information Page for maps and details. http://www.dart.org/schedules/busschedules.asp?quicksched=521%20

DART Biketrans commuting combines the cost-effectiveness of public transit with the health benefits of cycling. It is an earth-friendly alternative to commuting in a single-occupancy vehicle. http://www.dart.org/riding//bike.asp
42.709-3 Responsibilities. ( a ) The cognizant contracting officer is responsible for— ( 1 ) Determining whether the penalties in 42.709-2(a) should be assessed;
( 2 ) Determining whether such penalties should be waived pursuant to 42.709-6; and
( 3 ) Referring the matter to the appropriate criminal investigative organization for review and for appropriate coordination of remedies, if there is evidence that the contractor knowingly submitted unallowable costs.
( b ) The contract auditor, in the review and/or the determination of final indirect cost proposals for contracts subject to this section, is responsible for— ( 1 ) Recommending to the contracting officer which costs may be unallowable and subject to the penalties in 42.709-2(a);
( 2 ) Providing rationale and supporting documentation for any recommendation; and
( 3 ) Referring the matter to the appropriate criminal investigative organization for review and for appropriate coordination of remedies, if there is evidence that the contractor knowingly submitted unallowable costs.
[60 FR 42658, Aug. 16, 1995. Redesignated and amended at 86 FR 44255, Aug. 11, 2021]
Exhibit
      32.7








SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF


ILLINOIS
      POWER COMPANY


(required
      by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002)








In
      connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
      30, 2007 of Illinois Power Company (the “Registrant”) as filed by the
      Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Form 10-Q"), each undersigned officer of the Registrant does hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.










Date:  August 9,
      2007










/s/
      Scott A.
      Cisel


Scott
      A.
      Cisel


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)











/s/
      Warner L.
      Baxter


Warner
      L.
      Baxter


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
3012.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the acquisition of commercial items. ( f ) Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. Insert (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.212-70, Contract Terms and Conditions Applicable to DHS Acquisition of Commercial Items, in any solicitation or contract for commercial items when any of the provisions or clauses listed therein applies and where incorporation by reference of each selected provision or clause is, to the maximum extent practicable, consistent with customary commercial practice. If necessary, tailor this clause.
Docket No. FAA-2015-7527 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-094-AD
# C_2020049EN.01001001.xml

| 13.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 February 2020

(2020/C 49/09)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0914 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4718 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84058 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4965 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0645 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0445 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,878 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 339,49 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2554 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7663 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5923 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6175 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4468 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4788 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6832 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5122 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 288,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1266 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6073 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4575 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 912,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5140 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,189 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,7530 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,948 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,7286 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3274 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,8345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0914

JPY

Japanese yen

120,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4718

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84058

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4965

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0645

ISK

Iceland króna

137,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0445

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,878

HUF

Hungarian forint

339,49

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2554

RON

Romanian leu

4,7663

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5923

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6175

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4468

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4788

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6832

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5122

KRW

South Korean won

1 288,00

ZAR

South African rand

16,1266

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6073

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4575

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 912,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5140

PHP

Philippine peso

55,189

RUB

Russian rouble

68,7530

THB

Thai baht

33,948

BRL

Brazilian real

4,7286

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3274

INR

Indian rupee

77,8345

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.1


                              COMMUNITY BANKS, INC.
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                            (Chief Executive Officer)

In connection with the Annual Report of Community Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Eddie  L.
Dunklebarger,  Chief Executive Officer,  Chairman, and President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

The foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C.  ss.
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community  Banks,  Inc.,  and will be retained by  Community  Banks,
Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/  Eddie L. Dunklebarger
------------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and President
March 9, 2005
32.304-6 Other collateral security. The following are examples of other forms of security that, although seldom invoked under guaranteed loans, may be required when considered necessary for protection of the Government interest: ( a ) Mortgages on fixed assets.
( b ) Liens against inventories.
( c ) Endorsements.
( d ) Guarantees.
( e ) Subordinations or standbys of other indebtedness.
#### 4.2300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018 (title II of Pub. L. 115-390) and the Federal Acquisition Security Council (FASC) regulation at 41 CFR part 201-1. The authority provided in this subpart expires on December 31, 2033 (see 41 U.S.C. 1328).