alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NO. 30001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent-Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. RICKY MOORE, Petitioner-Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CR. NO. 08-1-1252)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Nakayama, J., for the court ) 1 

## Petitioner-Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari filed on September 21, 2010, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 29, 2010.
FOR THE COURT: /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Associate Justice Jeffrey A. Hawk of Hawk Sing Ignacio & Watersfor petitioner-defendantappellant on the application

C o n s i d e r e d b y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , A c o b a , a n d D u f f y , J J . , a n d 1 C i r c u i t J u d g e P o l l a c k , a s s i g n e d b y r e a s o n o f v a c a n c y . 

## Electronically Filed Supreme Court 30001 29-OCT-2010 10:35 AM
409.503 Waiver. ( a ) The HCA, on a non-delegable basis, is authorized to waive any general rule or procedure in FAR 9.5 when in the Government's interest.
( b ) Each request for waiver shall include: ( 1 ) The general rule or procedure proposed to be waived;
( 2 ) An analysis of the potential conflict, including the benefits and detriments to the Government and prospective contractors;
( 3 ) A discussion of why the conflict cannot be avoided, neutralized, or mitigated; and
( 4 ) Advice of counsel obtained under FAR 9.504(b).
# C_2018177EN.01000201.xml

| 24.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 May 2018

(2018/C 177/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1708 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4495 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87953 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2906 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1598 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5063 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,813 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 319,53 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3088 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6294 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,7086 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5544 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5109 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1904 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6977 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5754 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 266,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8062 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4797 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3913 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 642,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6627 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,432 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,2643 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,641 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3040 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,3550 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,1055 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1708

JPY

Japanese yen

128,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4495

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87953

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2906

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1598

ISK

Iceland króna

123,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5063

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,813

HUF

Hungarian forint

319,53

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3088

RON

Romanian leu

4,6294

TRY

Turkish lira

5,7086

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5544

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5109

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1904

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6977

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5754

KRW

South Korean won

1 266,75

ZAR

South African rand

14,8062

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4797

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3913

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 642,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6627

PHP

Philippine peso

61,432

RUB

Russian rouble

72,2643

THB

Thai baht

37,641

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3040

MXN

Mexican peso

23,3550

INR

Indian rupee

80,1055

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
(November 24, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Cuty and Marie Rockefeller, Appellants.

Application for the appointment of a Special District Attorney to act during the disqualification of the District Attorney in the prosecution of this appeal granted; and Sidney II. Kitay, Esq., Canton, New York, appointed for that purpose. (County Law, § 701.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, J J.,. concur.
Narrative Form of Series E Stock Certificate [FACE OF CERTIFICATE]

                         Incorporated Under The Laws of
                                     Nevada

                              BIOMUNE SYSTEMS, INC.
Number _____                                                 _________ Shares

          Series E 8% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Preferred Stock

                        SEE RESTRICTIVE LEGEND ON REVERSE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT  _____________  is the  recordholder of  ___________________
shares of Series E 8% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Preferred Stock, $0.0001
par value per share, of Biomune Systems, Inc., transferable only on the Books of
the Corporation by the holder hereof in person, or by duly authorized  attorney,
on the surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF  the duly  authorized  officers  of this  Corporation  have
hereunto subscribed their names and caused the Seal to be hereto affixed at Salt
Lake City, Utah this ___ day of ______________, ____ A.D.


------------------------------             -----------------------------------
                   , Secretary                                  , President


                         Shares $0.0001 EachREVERSE SIDE OF CERTIFICATE:

   For value received,  ______ hereby sell, assign and transfer  unto___________
 ______________ shares of the Capital Stock represented by the within
Certificate,  and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint  ________________
to transfer  the said Stock on the books of the within  named  Corporation  with
full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated:  _______________________, ____

In presence of
  -------------------------------            -------------------------------


NOTICE: THE SIGNATURES ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAMES AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.

THE SECURITIES  REPRESENTED BY THIS  CERTIFICATE  HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES
LAWS, AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR OTHERWISE  DISPOSED OF UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN
REGISTERED  UNDER  THAT  ACT AND ANY  APPLICABLE  STATE  SECURITIES  LAWS OR THE
CORPORATION  RECEIVES AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO IT THAT AN EXEMPTION
FROM REGISTRATION IS AVAILABLE.  THE SHARES MAY NOT BE OFFERED FOR SALE, SOLD OR
OTHERWISE  TRANSFERRED  EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE  REGISTRATION  STATEMENT
UNDER THE ACT OR PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM  REGISTRATION  UNDER THE ACT, THE
AVAILABILITY OF WHICH IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY. A
FULL STATEMENT OF THE VOTING  POWERS,  DESIGNATIONS,  PREFERENCES,  LIMITATIONS,
RESTRICTIONS  AND  RELATIVE  RIGHTS  GRANTED TO OR IMPOSED  UPON THE  RESPECTIVE
CLASSES  AND  FOR  SERIES  OF  SHARES  OF  STOCK  OF  THE  CORPORATION  AND  THE
QUALIFICATIONS,  LIMITATIONS AND  RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH RIGHTS MAY BE OBTAINED BY
ANY SHAREHOLDER  UPON REQUEST AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION AND THE
CORPORATION  WILL  FURNISH  SUCH  SHAREHOLDER,  WITHOUT  CHARGE,  A COPY OF SUCH
STATEMENT.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CENTEX CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy R. Eller, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ TIMOTHY R. ELLERTimothy R. EllerChief Executive OfficerDate: February 2, 2005
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 128 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, 

and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: 

Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. MANN, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. 

ROY, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. GOODEN of Texas, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 

MOOLENAAR, Ms. BOEBERT, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. OGLES, Mr. ISSA, Mr. 

ARMSTRONG, Mr. HUDSON, and Mr. WEBER of Texas) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing 

Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Standards of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 128 IH 

1 Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified 

2 Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: 

3 Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review’’ (89 Fed. 

4 Reg. 16820 (March 8, 2024)), and such rule shall have 

5 no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: F AA- 2012 - 1072 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM141AD

601R - 32 - 109 --- 5/29/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Thomas Lammerts, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 7,611.

Prosecution for violation of Prohibition Act. Judgment of conviction. Error to the County Court of Warren county; the Hon. Clinton M. Huey, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1926.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed September 15, 1926

Charles E. Lauder and Frederick H. Lauder, for plaintiff in error.

Henry D. Lewis, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth E. Edge, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth E. Edge    
|Kenneth E. Edge        
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 14, 2005         



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.11


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                        OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                         CENTRAL ILLINOIS LIGHT COMPANY
                         (required by Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection  with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended June
30, 2004 of Central  Illinois  Light  Company (the  "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Gary
L. Rainwater,  chief executive officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Form 10-Q fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 9, 2004



                                          /s/ Gary L. Rainwater
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Gary L. Rainwater
                                          Chairman, President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
From: Carlson, Sara <Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com>

Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:12 PM

To: Fortin, Kelly

Cc: Land, Eva; Grygar, Bill; Maness, Katie; Rahul Pendse (rpendse@trinityconsultants.com) Subject: Third Party Engine BACT Clarification

- Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
Attachments: Anadarko Petroleum Corpoation

- Third Party BACT Clarification.pdf

Good morning. Attached is the letter clarifying third party engine BACT for the BlackHawk, BlackHornet

a nd Bob Douglas air permit applications. A paper copy of the letter will be sent to the EPA Region 4 office address today. Please acknowledge you have received this email and if you have any questions please feel free to

contact me. Thanks,
Sara Carlson

Ana darko Petroleum Corporation Sr HSE Representative, Gulf of Mexico Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com

832

- 636

- 1273 (office)

832

- 506

- 0888 (cell)

Click here for Anadarko’s Electronic Mail Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 12.3

               SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (CONSOLIDATED)
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
                            (Thousands Except Ratio)
                                   (Unaudited)


Operating Income                                                    $143,437

Adjustments:
  Income taxes                                                        47,507
  Provision for deferred income taxes                                 (4,978)
  Deferred investment tax credits                                     (4,662)
  Other income and deductions                                          3,824
  Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
    used during construction                                           2,641
  Interest portion of financing leases                                   709

        Earnings                                                    $188,478
                                                                   =========

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                                         $39,237
  Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities                          8,515
  Interest on short-term debt and other                                6,342
  Interest portion of financing leases                                   709
                                                                   ---------

        Fixed Charges                                                $54,803
                                                                   =========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                      3.44
                                                                   =========
----

----

| CLECO CORPORATION | EXHIBIT 32.1 |
|-------------------|--------------|

|   Cleco Corporation                 |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     |
| 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                       |
| AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                        |
| SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |

| (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date:  May 4, 2011             |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Michael H. Madison                       |
| Michael H. MadisonPresident and Chief Executive Officer |

----

----
U .S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE May 13, 2015

Washington, DC 20590

Regarding : Amendment to Alaska Aerial Services’ Exemption No. 12668 in Regulatory Docket FAA

- 201 5

-

1202 to include additional aircraft as follows

.

Dear Sir or Mada m

,

Alaska Aerial Services was issued a Section 333 exemption for operation in the national airspace. Alaska

Aerial Services hereby requests an amendment to that exemption to allow additional Un manned

Aircraft Systems (UAS) with no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and

s afety that were the basis for the FAA granting the original exemption. All requested aircraft below have

been previously approved for use under Sec tion 333 exemptions.

Alaska Aerial Services wishes to operate the following additional UAS:

Aircraft Previously Approved

Under Exemption

3DR Solo 11309A

3DR Iris+ 11309A

DJI Phantom 2 11309A

DJI Phantom 3 11309A

DJI Inspire 11172A

Skywalker X8 11172A

ZETA Science FX

- 79 11492A

As this is an amendment to existing exemptions requesting only the addition of other types of

UAS, Alaska Aerial Services respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to

be published in the Fe deral Register for the requested amendment.

3875 Geist Road, Suite E #210

Fairbanks, AK 99709

Sincerely,

Carl France

Chief Pilot

Carl@AlaskaAerialServices.com
#### 219.301-3 Rerepresentation by a contractor that represented itself as other than a small business concern.

Follow the procedures at PGI 204.606(4)(vii) for reporting modifications for rerepresentation actions.

[76 FR 76320, Dec. 7, 2011]
36.101 Applicability. ( a ) Construction and architect-engineer contracts are subject to the requirements in other parts of this regulation, which shall be followed when applicable.
( b ) When a requirement in this part is inconsistent with a requirement in another part of this regulation, this part 36 shall take precedence if the acquisition of construction or architect-engineer services is involved.
( c ) A contract for both construction and supplies or services shall include ( 1 ) clauses applicable to the predominant part of the work (see subpart 22.4), or
( 2 ) if the contract is divided into parts, the clauses applicable to each portion.
[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 57 FR 55471, Nov. 25, 1992; 58 FR 12140, Mar. 2, 1993]
Exhibit 23.1

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 on Form S-3 (No. 333-193869), Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-206782) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-202473) of ITUS Corporation (the “Company”) of our report dated December 7, 2016 relating to our audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2016 and 2015, and for each of the years then ended, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2016.

Our report dated December 7, 2016, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has limited working capital and limited revenue-generating operations and a history of net losses and net operating cash flow deficits. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. 

HASKELL & WHITE LLP

Irvine, California

December 7, 2016
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Defendant(s).

Case No.

Judge 

$0(1'('JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s) 

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ 

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

 does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s) 

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: 

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge  presidinJ, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

decided by Judge on a motion

Date: Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

 , Deputy Clerk 

Yasko,

Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.

12-cv-02658

John J. Tharp Jr.

✔

8/20/14

Alberta Rone

Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff Laura Yasko, o/b/o Alan Yasko, M.D. and

against defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company in the amount of $1,000,000

as well as costs which includes prejudgment interest from July 15, 2011.

✔ John J. Tharp Jr.

EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv-02658 Document #: 57 Filed: 08/20/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1653
#### 44.400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the policies limiting the contract clauses a contractor may be required to apply to any subcontractors that are furnishing commercial products, including commercial components, or commercial services in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 3307.

[76 FR 14565, Mar. 16, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 24213, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 61030, Nov. 4, 2021]