alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 10

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF

AIR, WASTE AND TOXICS

SEP 08 2014

The Honorable Bill Sterud

Chainnan, Tribal Council

Puyallup Tribe of Indians

3009 East Portland Avenue

Tacoma, Washington 98404

RE: Offer for Consultation and Coordination on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Action to

Redesignate the Tacoma-Pierce County PM2.5 Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Review of

and Action on the Department of Ecology's Tacoma-Pierce County PM 2.5 Maintenance Plan.

Dear Chairman Sterud:

In December 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated the Tacoma-Pierce

County area, including portions of the Puyallup Reservation, as nonattainment for violating the fine

particulate matter (PM2.s) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In recent years pollution

levels in the area have declined and the Tacoma area is now attaining the PM2.s NAAQS. The EPA is

planning to propose to formally redesignate the Tacoma-Pierce County area from nonattainment to

attainment status. If the EPA were to redesignate the Tacoma-Pierce County area to attainment it would

include all tribal land in the area. Additionally, the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology), in

coordination with the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, intends to submit a plan demonstrating how the

area will continue to meet the PM 2.5 standard over the next ten years and a request to the EPA to

formally redesignate the area. At this time Ecology is conducting the state public comment process and

intends to submit the maintenance plan and redesignation request to the EPA by December 2014.

The EPA is offering consultation and coordination in accordance with the EPA Policy on Consultation

and Coordination with Indian Tribes (www.e>lov/tribal/consultation /consult-policy.htm). Please

have your staff notify Jeff Hunt, at 206-553-0256, by October 20, 2014 if you are interested in

scheduling a consultation meeting or would like further information about the redesignation process. In

addition to tribal consultation, we will coordinate with the Puyallup Tribe's air quality staff and there

QPrinted on Recycled Paper
will be opportunities for public involvement through the EPA's public comment process. A public

comment period will be open for at least 30 days following the EPA's proposed action. Feel free to call

me at 206-553-1271 if you have any questions.

K. e Kelly, Dir-' Y.r

Office of Air, . ste, and Toxics

cc: Bill Sullivan, Puyallup Tribe

Natural Resources Director (via e-mail)

Mary Basballe, Puyallup Tribe

Air Quality Staff (via e-mail)

.3r

:rg

PrffledonRecy edPaper
#### 432.207 Administration and payment of commercial financing payments.

The responsibility for receiving, reviewing, and approval of contract financing requests may not be transferred from the contracting officer.
# C_2020208EN.01000101.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 June 2020

(2020/C 208/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1210 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4554 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90505 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5670 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0656 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 154,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7135 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,683 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 345,44 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4516 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8428 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,6887 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6261 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5209 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6889 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7403 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5623 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 353,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,4440 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9332 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5665 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 927,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7854 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,133 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,6565 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,765 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,0029 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,3126 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,3520 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1210

JPY

Japanese yen

119,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4554

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90505

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5670

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0656

ISK

Iceland króna

154,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7135

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,683

HUF

Hungarian forint

345,44

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4516

RON

Romanian leu

4,8428

TRY

Turkish lira

7,6887

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6261

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5209

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6889

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7403

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5623

KRW

South Korean won

1 353,53

ZAR

South African rand

19,4440

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9332

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5665

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 927,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7854

PHP

Philippine peso

56,133

RUB

Russian rouble

77,6565

THB

Thai baht

34,765

BRL

Brazilian real

6,0029

MXN

Mexican peso

25,3126

INR

Indian rupee

85,3520

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
32.107 Need for contract financing not a deterrent. ( a ) If the contractor or offeror meets the standards prescribed for responsible prospective contractors at 9.104, the contracting officer shall not treat the contractor's need for contract financing as a handicap for a contract award; e.g., as a responsibility factor or evaluation criterion.
( b ) The contractor should not be disqualified from contract financing solely because the contractor failed to indicate a need for contract financing before the contract was awarded.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FHP [electronic resource]: themagazine of force health protection.**
 
Volume One: 01 | 02
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.95/5:
Item Number:0307-A-16 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000712883
 
January 15, 2020
# C_2018455EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 455/01)

Last publication

OJ C 445, 10.12.2018

Past publications

OJ C 436, 3.12.2018

OJ C 427, 26.11.2018

OJ C 408, 12.11.2018

OJ C 399, 5.11.2018

OJ C 392, 29.10.2018

OJ C 381, 22.10.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32.0

# Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cal-Maine
Foods Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended February 26, 2005
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|/s/ Fred R. Adams, Jr.                            | 
|------------------------------------------------- | 
|Fred R. Adams, Jr.                                | 
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 

|/s/  Bobby J. Raines                                             | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Bobby J. Raines                                                  | 
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | 

Date:  May 16, 2005
of the main office of the Bank for a period of ten years, coinciding with the number of years thatthe Director shall receive such compensation.9. Assignment of Rights. None of the rights to compensation under this Agreement are assignableby the Director or any beneficiary or designee of the Director and any attempt to anticipate, sell,transfer, assign, pledge, encumber or change Director’s right to receive compensation, shall bevoid.10. Status of Director’s Rights. The rights granted to the Director or any designee orbeneficiary under this Agreement shall be solely those of an unsecured creditor of the Bank.11. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by a written Agreement signed by the parties.12. If the Bank shall acquire an insurance policy or any other asset in connection with theliabilities assumed by it hereunder, it is expressly understood and agreed that neither Directornor any beneficiary of Director shall have any right with respect to, or claim against, suchpolicy or other asset except as expressly provided by the terms of such policy or in the title tosuch other asset. Such policy or asset shall not be deemed to be held under any trust for thebenefit of Director or his beneficiaries or to be held in any way as collateral security for thefulfilling of the obligations of the Bank under this Agreement except as may be expressly providedby the terms of such policy or other asset. It shall be, and remain, a general, unpledged,unrestricted asset of the Bank.13. This agreement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State ofPennsylvania.14. Interpretation. Wherever appropriate in this Agreement, words used in the singular shallinclude the plural and the masculine shall include the feminine gender.
#### 452.228-71 Insurance Coverage.

As prescribed in 428.310, insert the following clause:

# Insurance Coverage (NOV 1996)

Pursuant to FAR clause 52.228-5, Insurance-Work on a Government Installation, the Contractor will be required to present evidence to show, as a minimum, the amounts of insurance coverage indicated below:

(a) Workers Compensation and Employer's Liability. The Contractor is required to comply with applicable Federal and State workers' compensation and occupational disease statutes. If occupational diseases are not compensable under those statutes, they shall be covered under the employer's liability section of the insurance policy, except when contract operations are so commingled with a Contractor's commercial operations that it would not be practical to require this coverage. Employer's liability coverage of at least $100,000 shall be required, except in States with exclusive or monopolistic funds that do not permit worker's compensation to be written by private carriers.

(b) General Liability. The Contractor shall have bodily injury liability insurance coverage written on a comprehensive form of policy of at least $500,000 per occurrence.

(c) Automobile Liability. The Contractor shall have automobile liability insurance written on a comprehensive form of policy. The policy shall provide for bodily injury and property damage liability covering the operation of all automobiles used in connection with performing the contract. Policies covering automobiles operated in the United States shall provide coverage of at least $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage or loss.

(d) Aircraft Public and Passenger Liability. When aircraft are used in connection with performing the contract, the Contractor shall have aircraft public and passenger liability insurance. Coverage shall be at least $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, other than passenger injury. Coverage for passenger injury shall be at least $200,000 multiplied by the number of seats or passengers, whichever is greater.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (NOV 1996). As prescribed in 428.310, substitute the following paragraph (b), when additionally the contractor must have property damage liability coverage:

(b) General Liability. (1) The Contractor shall have bodily injury liability coverage written on a comprehensive form of policy of at least $500,000 per occurrence.

(2) The Contractor shall have property damage liability insurance shall be required in the amount of ______* per occurrence.

- *Contracting Officer shall insert amount required.*
# C_2019432EN.01000101.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 432/01)

Last publication

OJ C 423, 16.12.2019

Past publications

OJ C 413, 9.12.2019

OJ C 406, 2.12.2019

OJ C 399, 25.11.2019

OJ C 383, 11.11.2019

OJ C 372, 4.11.2019

OJ C 363, 28.10.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Herbert O’Shay CUNNINGHAM, also known as Swerve, Appellant.

No. 07-2594.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 5, 2008.

Filed: June 12, 2008.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Herbert Cunningham appeals the 188-month prison sentence the district court1
      *627imposed following his guilty plea to distributing cocaine base after having been convicted of one or more felony drug offenses, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 851. Cunningham stipulated in his plea agreement that he was subject to sentencing as a career offender. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. He now argues that the sentence is unreasonable because it rests on an overstated criminal history and improper consideration of juvenile offenses; and is unconstitutional because the district court afforded the Guidelines a presumption of reasonableness.

On appeal, Cunningham’s sentence at the bottom of the advisory Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable. *See United States v. Lincoln,*413 F.3d 716, 717-18 (8th Cir.2005); *see also Rita v. United States,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) (approving appellate presumption of reasonableness). We conclude that the record does not support Cunningham’s arguments. Rather, the record demonstrates that the district court properly considered all applicable statutory sentencing factors, including Cunningham’s extensive criminal history — which the court found was not overstated — and his high risk for recidivism; and that it did not afford the Guidelines provisions a presumption of reasonableness, but treated them as only one factor. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); *United States v. Wadena,*470 F.3d 735, 737 (8th Cir.2006) (appellate court reviews sentence for reasonableness, which requires reviewing court to ask whether district court abused its discretion); *United States v. Swehla,*442 F.3d 1143, 1146 (8th Cir.2006) (district court did not err in basing sentence on career-offender stipulation and overall criminal record, including crimes committed when defendant was juvenile); *United States v. Haack,*403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir.2005) (stating ways in which abuse of discretion may occur).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we deny Cunningham’s motions for appointment of new counsel.

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 47

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               repeal the sixteenth article of amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2023

  Mr. Davidson (for himself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
    Jackson of Texas, and Mr. Perry) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               repeal the sixteenth article of amendment.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein),
    Section 1. That the following article is proposed as an amendment 
to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 
intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Effective 2 years after the ratification of this article of 
amendment, the sixteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of 
the United States is repealed, and the Congress shall have no power to 
lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, except 
in time of war declared by the Congress.''.
    Sec. 2. Not later than 180 days after the ratification of the 
article of amendment in section 1, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
submit a report to Congress containing recommendations for any 
legislation that may be necessary to implement such article.
                                 <all>
```
#### NORTON, Respondent, v. HARTER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 24, 1903.)

Action by George W. Norton against Frederick J. Harter

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to change the place of trial granted, with $10 costs to abide event. Held, that under the circumstances of this case the place where the cause of action arose should control as to the place of trial.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 13

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of The BOC Group plc (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 6, 2004                       /s/ Anthony Eric Isaac
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Anthony Eric Isaac
                                             Title: Chief Executive


Date: December 6, 2004                       /s/ Rene Medori
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Rene Medori
                                             Title: Group Finance Director
# Instructions

# Table A

# Table B

# Competitive Priority 1 Table

# Table (D)(4)

# Budget Table

# Example-Expansion

# Example-Development
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7598
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PATRICK DENNIS TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CR-03-68-SGW; CA-05-244-SGW) Submitted: March 22, 2006 Decided: April 14, 2006 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick Dennis Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Patrick Dennis Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3333 HOLDING
CORPORATION'S JUNE 30, 1999, FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000818762
<NAME> 3333 HOLDING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       19
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             191
<DEPRECIATION>                                      61
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,406)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,610
<SALES>                                            150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   150
<CGS>                                              723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (573)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>