alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GRANTEE ABSTRACT 

Massachusetts
 

Overview 

In the first year of the grant, we will enroll 

750 eligible four-year old children across the 

districts through a local investment of 

$14,225,000 in Preschool Expansion grant 

funds. Over the four years of this grant 

award, we will serve a total of 3,000 

additional children (750 each year) living in 

families below 200% of the Federal Poverty 

Level (FPL). 

While all Early Learning Providers (ELPs) 

serving these children will meet the 12 

required HQPP standards, this funding will 

also significantly advance preschool quality 

and early education/public preschool 

partnerships within each of the five HN 

communities. It will enable the 

Commonwealth to better meet the needs of 

each community’s vulnerable families through 

improved outreach, access and coordination of 

comprehensive services, assuring that young 

children's development is supported and 

advanced in their home environments, as well 

as in their preschool settings. 

Project Objectives and Activities 

•	 Expand Development of MixedService Partnerships in the 5 High 

Need Communities. 

•	 Expansion of Preschool Access. 

Lead Agency 

Massachusetts Department of Early 

Education and Care 

Year 1 Federal Award Amount 

$15,000,000 

Plan Period 

January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2018 

Preschool Development Grants will support
 

states to build, develop, and expand voluntary,
 

high-quality preschool programs for children from
 

low- and moderate-income families.
 

There are two types of grants.
 

Development Grants: For states that 

currently serve less than 10 percent of fouryear-olds and have not received a Race to 

the Top – Early Learning Challenge (RTTELC) grant 

Expansion Grants: For states that currently 

serve 10 percent or more of four-year-olds or 

have received a Race to the Top – Early 

Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) grant 

•	 Support of Strong Family Engagement 

in Each LEA. 

•	 Delivery of Comprehensive Services. 

•	 Program Quality and Child Outcome 

Improvement. 

•	 Workforce Development. 

•	 Responsibly manage the 

implementation of this $15M process 

through improved Data Development 

and Use. 

This abstract was submitted as part of Massachusetts’ Preschool Development Grant Application. 

1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

EXPANSION GRANTEE: MASSACHUSETTS 

As the Commonwealth continues to move to 

performance-based contracting, we will expand 

our use of evidence-based practice (EBP) 

while fostering innovation at the community 

level, and we will develop and share 

knowledge through continued formative 

assessment, as well as benchmarking 

outcomes through indicators such as 

attendance, preschool suspensions, school 

readiness, third grade reading proficiency, and 

family engagement. 

Boston Lowell 

Holyoke Springfield 

Lawrence 

High Need Communities to be served 

under Massachusetts’ Plan 

This abstract was submitted as part of Massachusetts’ Preschool Development Grant Application. 2
# C_2017334EN.01000201.xml

| 6.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/2

---

Call for proposals under the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 5437
   (1)
  amending Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921
   (2)
  )

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 5437

1

amending Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921

2

)

(2017/C 334/02)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, is hereby launching a call for proposals in order to award grants in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector (General envelope).

This call for proposals addresses the priority Single European Sky — SESAR, with an indicative budget of EUR 290 million.

Single European Sky — SESAR

The deadline for the submission of proposals is 15 March 2018.

The complete texts of the calls for proposals are available on:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-transport/apply-funding/2017-cef-transport-calls-proposals

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 5437 final of 3 August 2017 amending Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 establishing a Multi-Annual Work Programme 2014-2020 for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020.

1

(2)  Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 final of 26 March 2014 establishing a Multi-Annual Work Programme 2014 for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020.

2

---
First Amendment to Savings and Investment Plan


 Exhibit 10.8a 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 OF 
 FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SAVINGS
AND INVESTMENT PLAN 
 WHEREAS, FMC
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the FMC Technologies, Inc. Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, since its spin-off from FMC Corporation, the Company has allowed participants in the Plan to continue to hold or sell balances in the FMC Corporation Stock Fund in the participants’
discretion, but has prohibited new investments in the FMC Corporation Stock Fund; 
 WHEREAS, the Company now deems
necessary and desirable to amend the Plan to eliminate the FMC Corporation Stock Fund from the investment options offered under the Plan; and 
 NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority reserved to the Company by Section 10.3 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of July 1, 2003, as follows: 
 Section 10.3.3. Investment of Accounts is here by amended by adding the following to the end thereof: 
 “Effective July 1, 2003 the FMC Stock Fund will be eliminated as an Investment Fund in the Plan. The Company will direct the
Trustee to sell any balances remaining in the FMC Corporation Stock Fund on June 30, 2003 and reinvest the proceeds from such sale into another Investment Fund under the Plan to be designated by the Company at the time. It is currently
anticipated that any remaining balances in the FMC Corporation Stock Fund will be transferred to the Fidelity Retirement Government Money Market Portfolio.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer has executed the foregoing amendment on behalf of the Company, this
13th day of August 2002. 
  

			
	FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ William H. Schumann
		 	Senior Vice President and
		 	Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Clifford Dunning, Appellant, v. Charles L. Patterson et al., Constituting the New York City Transit Authority, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, brought by petitioner, an employee of the New York City Transit Authority, who had been dismissed by the Authority after a hearing upon charges and whose punishment had been reduced by this court of February 26, 1962 to six months’ suspension *{Matter of Running*v. *Patterson,*15 A D 2d 818), to compel the Authority to pay him back salary from January 6, 1960 (the date of his dismissal) until March 22, 1962 (the date of his reinstatement pursuant to our order), less the salary for the six months’ suspension ordered by this court, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 20, 1962, which denied his petition. Order affirmed, without costs *{Matter of Mitthauer*v. *Patterson,*13 A D 2d 696). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### Peter R. Sturner et al., Appellants, v. Louis Cook et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from order of Brie Special Term granting the defendant the right to make a transcript of the stenographic record of defendant’s statement given to an agent of an attorney for the plaintiffs.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### 33.001 General.

There are other Federal court-related protest authorities and dispute-appeal authorities that are not covered by this part of the FAR, e.g., 28 U.S.C. 1491 for Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction. Contracting officers should contact their designated legal advisor for additional information whenever they become aware of any litigation related to their contracts.

[77 FR 56743, Sept. 13, 2012]
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANEX-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SecureCARE
Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the SEC (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company


Name:   /s/ NEIL BURLEY
        -------------------------------------
        Neil Burley
Title:  Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Date:   August 15, 2005

                                        22
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 04, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 04, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0221. RODRIGO VARELA v. SELENE FINANCE LP. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15A10559
#### In the Matter of David A. Pravda (Admitted as David Alan Pravda), an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

May 24, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Oscar J. Cohen*of counsel *(Nicholas C. Cooper,*attorney), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Divi*157sion, Second Department, on March 16, 1966. Upon the completion of a hearing on charges of professional misconduct before a Referee, respondent was found to have unnecessarily delayed the prosecution of a divorce action in which he had been retained, to have procrastinated in pursuing a negligence action, and in misleading his client as to the status of the case, and to have failed to file a retainer and closing statement in the same negligence action.

Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committtee for the First Judicial Department, moves to confirm the Referee’s report, and for an order censuring respondent. Although respondent failed to answer the petition, he did testify before the Referee that he had returned the fee in the divorce action and settled a malpractice suit that the client had instituted against him for his delay in prosecuting the matter, that the negligence action had been settled and his client had received his share of the settlement, and that the failure to file the retainer and closing statement was strictly an oversight.

The Referee found no evidence of venality and noted that respondent had been candid and fully co-operative in his testimony, and appeared when required. However, since respondent has been previously admonished on March 3, 1971, for neglecting a case and misleading the client as to the status of the case, petitioner’s motion should be granted.

Accordingly, the report of the Referee should be confirmed and respondent should be censured for his misconduct.

Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Markewich, Lupiano and Silver-man, JJ., concur.

Respondent censured.
124 STAT. 1274 PUBLIC LAW 111–189—JUNE 9, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4628 (S. 3013): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Mar. 15, 16, considered and passed House. 

May 25, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–189 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 216 Westwood 

Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER R. HRBEK POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. 

Hrbek Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building’’. 

Approved June 9, 2010. 

June 9, 2010 

[H.R. 4628] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
#### 335.072 Key personnel.

If the contracting officer determines that the personnel to be assigned to perform effort on an R&D contract are critical to the success of the R&D effort, or were a critical factor in the award of the contract, then the contracting officer should consider using the key personnel clause at 352.237-75, Key Personnel.
#### 18.101 General.

The FAR includes many acquisition flexibilities that are available to the contracting officer when certain conditions are met. These acquisition flexibilities do not require an emergency declaration or designation of contingency operation.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1970

FASIL TAKLETSADIK,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A97-203-892)

Submitted: April 25, 2007 Decided: May 9, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason A. Dzubow, MENSAH, BUTLER & DZUBOW, PLLC, Washington, D.C.,

for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,

Michelle Gorden Latour, Assistant Director, Jessica E. Sherman,

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

We lack jurisdiction over any challenge to the Board’s order

denying the motion to reopen, because Takletsadik failed to file a

timely petition for review from that order. See Stone v. INS, 514

U.S. 386, 405 (1995) (holding filing of reconsideration motion does

not toll time period for filing petition for review).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Fasil Takletsadik, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying a motion to reconsider its prior order

denying his motion to reopen proceedings. We have reviewed the

record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse

its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir.

2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board.* See In re Takletsadik, No. A97-203-

892 (B.I.A. Aug. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### In re NIAGARA, L. & O. POWER CO. Appeal of PREISCH et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 7, 1906.)

Appeal from Special Term, Niagara County.

Application of the Niagara, Lockport & -Ontario Power Company to acquire the lands of Dennis L. Preisch and others by condemnation. From an order permitting plaintiff to immediately enter upon the lands-described in the petition, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

*859Argued before McLENNAN, P. J., and SPRING, WILLIAMS, NASH, and KRUSE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements on opinion of SPRING, J., in Matter of Flarlce (decision in which is handed down herewith) 97 N. Y. Supp. 853.
#### 252.217-7003 Changes.

As prescribed in 217.7104(a), use the following clause:

# Changes (DEC 1991)

(a) The Contracting Officer may, at any time and without notice to the sureties, by written change order, make changes within the general scope of any job order issued under the Master Agreement in—

(1) Drawings, designs, plans, and specifications;

(2) Work itemized;

(3) Place of performance of the work;

(4) Time of commencement or completion of the work; and

(5) Any other requirement of the job order.

(b) If a change causes an increase or decrease in the cost of, or time required for, performance of the job order, whether or not changed by the order, the Contracting Officer shall make an equitable adjustment in the price or date of completion, or both, and shall modify the job order in writing.

(1) Within ten days after the Contractor receives notification of the change, the Contractor shall submit to the Contracting Officer a request for price adjustment, together with a written estimate of the increased cost.

(2) The Contracting Officer may grant an extension of this period if the Contractor requests it within the ten day period.

(3) If the circumstances justify it, the Contracting Officer may accept and grant a request for equitable adjustment at any later time prior to final payment under the job order, except that the Contractor may not receive profit on a payment under a late request.

(c) If the Contractor includes in its claim the cost of property made obsolete or excess as a result of a change, the Contracting Officer shall have the right to prescribe the manner of disposition of that property.

(d) Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute within the meaning of the Disputes clause.

(e) Nothing in this clause shall excuse the Contractor from proceeding with the job order as changed.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 49849, Aug. 16, 2010]
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION
 OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
 AMEREN
CORPORATION
 (required
by Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)
 
 
 In
connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2005 of Ameren Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Warner L.
Baxter, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
May 10, 2005
 ****By:
    /s/ Warner L.
  BaxterWarner
      L. BaxterExecutive Vice President
      andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
  Officer)
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Home |
|                                                   |

SEAs in any State, including the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each of the outlying areas.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov