alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 105 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 2, 2024 

Ms. OMAR submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of a license to export with respect to 

4 the following proposed export to the United Arab Emir5 ates is hereby prohibited: 

6 (1) The sale of the following defense articles 

7 and services, described in Transmittal No. 23–52, 

8 submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) 

9 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

10 2776(b)(1)): eighteen (18) AN/TPQ–50 Radar SysVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:22 Jan 02, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ105.IH HJ105
2 

•HJ 105 IH 

1 tems—man-portable version. Also included are 

2 107mm High Explosive (HE) rockets (for CONUS 

3 testing only); Computer Digital Military Laptop 

4 Radar Control Display units; 5kW Advanced Me5 dium Mobile Power Source (AMMPS) Trailer6 Mounted, Diesel Engine Driven Power Unit PU– 

7 2001; spares; mission equipment; communication 

8 and navigation equipment; support equipment; re9 pair parts; special tools and test equipment; tech10 nical data and publications; site survey; United 

11 States Government and contractor technical and lo12 gistics personnel services; and other related elements 

13 of logistics and program support. 

Æ
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

                  - Name
                  - **Julia Martin Eile**
                  - Address
                  -  U.S. Department of Education, OSERS400 Maryland Ave., SW,  PCP 5146Washington, DC 20202  
                  - Email
                  - Julia.Martin.Eile@ed.gov
                  - Telephone
                  - 202-245-7431
                  - TDD
                  - If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339. 

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 2813.307 Forms.

Bureaus may use order forms other than the Standard Forms (SF) and Optional Forms (OF) identified in FAR 13.307. They may also include on those forms clauses suitable for the specific purchase, including tailored clauses, provided that proper procedures and all relevant limitations, documentation instructions, and required maintenance are followed.
#### 405.303 Announcement of contract awards.

Contracting officers shall make information available on any contract award with an estimated total value over $1 million (including options) to their agency congressional liaison office in sufficient time for the agency to announce it by 5:00 p.m. Washington, DC time on the day of award. The agency congressional liaison office shall, concurrent with the public announcement, provide the award announcement information to the USDA Congressional Relations Office.
EXHIBIT 10.67



 Exhibit 10.67 
 September 29, 2009 
 Mr. Jim Tait 
 SVP AOL Technologies 
 AOL, LLC 
 22000 AOL Way 
 Dulles, Virginia 20166 

 

	Re:	Amended and Restated Agreement for Delivery of Service between Level 3 Communications, LLC (“Level 3”) and AOL LLC (f/k/a/ America Online, Inc.)
(“Customer”) effective as of April 18, 2000, as amended (the “Managed Modem Agreement”). 

 Dear Mr. Tait: 
 This letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) is intended to supplement that certain letter
agreement by and between Level 3 and Customer dated September 1, 2009 by inserting one provision inadvertently omitted from the letter agreement, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	[****]:    Effective September 1, 2009, Customer and Level 3 agree that [****]. 

  

	 	2.	Other existing terms and conditions:    All other terms and conditions in the Managed Modem Agreement not specifically addressed herein will
remain in effect. In the event of any conflicts between the terms of the Managed Modem Agreement and this Letter Agreement, the terms of this Letter Agreement shall govern. 

 If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please execute one copy of this letter and return it to the undersigned at your earliest convenience. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
	
	  

	
	Accepted and agreed:
	
	AOL LLC
	
	  


  

 1
# C_2019284EN.01000201.xml

| 22.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 August 2019

(2019/C 284/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1104 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4564 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91545 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6983 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0875 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9263 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,794 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 327,31 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3529 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7280 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3462 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6337 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4761 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7072 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7308 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5354 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8573 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8438 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3830 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 808,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6387 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,941 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,1897 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,173 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4621 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8446 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,4655 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1104

JPY

Japanese yen

118,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4564

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91545

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6983

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0875

ISK

Iceland króna

138,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9263

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,794

HUF

Hungarian forint

327,31

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3529

RON

Romanian leu

4,7280

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3462

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6337

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4761

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7072

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7308

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5354

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,79

ZAR

South African rand

16,8573

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8438

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3830

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 808,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6387

PHP

Philippine peso

57,941

RUB

Russian rouble

73,1897

THB

Thai baht

34,173

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4621

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8446

INR

Indian rupee

79,4655

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTWAN WHITE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 472 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of April, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Bruce Leibensperger, :

Appellant :

: No. 87 C.D. 2015

v. :

:

Carpenter Technologies, Inc. :

t/a Carpenter Technology Corp. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7

th day of December, 2016, it is ORDERED that the 

above-captioned opinion filed September 22, 2016, shall be designated OPINION 

rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

________________________________

PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge
309.405 Effect of listing (compelling reason determinations). ( a ) The head of the contracting activity (HCA) (non-delegable) may, with the written concurrence of the Suspension and Debarment Official, make the determinations referenced in FAR 9.405(a) regarding contracts. ( 1 ) If a contracting officer considers it necessary to award a contract, or consent to a subcontract with a debarred or suspended contractor, the contracting officer shall prepare a determination, including all pertinent documentation, and submit it through appropriate acquisition channels to the HCA. The documentation shall include the date by which approval is required and a compelling reason for the proposed action. Compelling reasons for award of a contract or consent to a subcontract with a debarred or suspended contractor include the following: ( i ) Only the cited contractor can provide the property or services, and
( ii ) The urgency of the requirement dictates that HHS conduct business with the cited contractor.
( 2 ) If the HCA decides to approve the requested action, the HCA shall request the concurrence of the Suspension and Debarment Official and, if given, shall inform the contracting officer in writing of the determination within the required time period.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12



               AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL PAPER PLACEMENT AGREEMENT
                         BETWEEN AMCORE FINANCIAL, INC.
                          AND M&I MARSHALL ILSLEY BANK
                                OCTOBER 28, 1998




Section 2.     Aggregate Limits of Issuer's Commercial Paper.  Issuer covenants
               and agrees that the outstanding principal amount owing under
               Issuer's Commercial Paper placed by agent with Purchasers 
               pursuant to this Agreement, when added to the amounts drawn and 
               outstanding under Bank-Up Lines of Credit, shall not at any time
               exceed $50,000,000.




All other sections of the Commercial Paper Placement Agreement shall remain in
effect.


                                        DATE:         11/2/98
                                             -----------------------------
                                        ISSUER:  Amcore Financial, Inc.
                                               ---------------------------
                                        BY: /s/ John R. Hecht
                                           -------------------------------
                                        ITS: EVP & CFO 
                                            ------------------------------
                                            (Title)



                                        AGENT:  M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank
                                              ----------------------------
                                        BY: 
                                           -------------------------------
                                        ITS:
                                            ------------------------------
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 179 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury 

relating to ‘‘Clean Vehicle Credits Under Sections 25E and 30D; Transfer of Credits; Critical Minerals and Battery Components; Foreign Entities of Concern’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 2, 2024 

Mr. PALMER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of the Treasury relating to ‘‘Clean Vehicle Credits Under Sections 25E and 30D; Transfer of 

Credits; Critical Minerals and Battery Components; Foreign Entities of Concern’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of the Treasury relating to ‘‘Clean Vehicle Cred5 its Under Sections 25E and 30D; Transfer of Credits; 

6 Critical Minerals and Battery Components; Foreign EntiVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:40 Jul 02, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ179.IH HJ179

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 179 IH 

1 ties of Concern’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 37706 (May 6, 2024)), 

2 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3361MN

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Roger G. Leffler, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: May 14, 1998

Filed: May 21, 1998

_____________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Roger G. Leffler appeals his mail fraud and counterfeit securities convictions and

the guidelines sentence imposed by the district court. We affirm.

Leffler raises three contentions related to his convictions. We reject these

contentions. First, the record contains abundant evidence on which the jury reasonably

could have found Leffler guilty of all charges. Second, the district court did not abuse

its discretion in denying Leffler's motion for severance. Third, although we agree with

Leffler that the prosecutor's disparaging comments in rebuttal argument were excessive

and unnecessary, they were abbreviated, isolated, and nonrecurring, and when viewed
-2-

in the framework of a six-day trial that produced substantial evidence of Leffler's guilt,

the jury could not reasonably have been affected by the challenged comments.

Leffler also challenges the district court's sentencing enhancement for obstruction

of justice. We reject this challenge as well. Because the district court's factual findings

on obstruction of justice were not clearly erroneous and the district court did not

misapply the guidelines, we must affirm the enhancement.

After careful review, we conclude the district court correctly resolved each of

Leffler's contentions, and we are satisfied that no error of law appears. We thus affirm

Leffler's convictions and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
3049.9001 Policy (USCG). ( a ) *Applicability.* This section implements 14 U.S.C. 1155 and provides the policy for the USCG to use for contract terminations. This contract termination policy applies to USCG contract terminations, including contracts for commercial items, with a total value of more than $1,000,000.
( b ) *Notification.* Before terminating a contract with a total value of more than $1,000,000, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall notify the contractor and the contractor shall be required to maintain all work product related to the contract until the earlier of— ( 1 ) not less than 1 year after the date of the notification; or
( 2 ) the date the Commandant notifies the vendor that maintenance of such work product is no longer required.
( c ) *Work Product Defined.* The term “work product”— ( 1 ) Means tangible and intangible items and information produced or possessed as a result of a contract referred to in subsection (b); and
( 2 ) Includes— ( i ) Any completed end items;
( ii ) Any uncompleted end items; and
( iii ) Any property in the Contractor's possession in which the United States Government has an interest.
( d ) *Penalty.* A Contractor that fails to maintain work product as required under subsection (b) is liable to the United States for a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 for each day on which such work product is unavailable.
( e ) *Requirement.* The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause in contracts and subcontracts, including contracts and for commercial items, with a total value of more than $1,000,000.
#### 23.002 Policy.

In accordance with section 208(a) of Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, agencies shall reduce emissions, including greenhouse gas emissions; promote environmental stewardship; support resilient supply chains; drive innovation; and incentivize markets for sustainable products and services.

[89 FR 30238, Apr. 22, 2024]
# C_2017101EN.01000301.xml

| 31.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8398 — OTPP/OGF Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 101/05)

On 21 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8398. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8398. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
You may be wondering why you need to know about diploma mills and accreditation - simply put, not every institution is what it appears to be.  In order for you to become a smart consumer, you'll need to have a basic understanding of accreditation in the United States and how it works, the difference between accredited or unaccredited institutions, and the pitfalls of enrolling in a "diploma mill."  Today there are tools available to consumers in order to help combat the problem of diploma mills and provide more information for parents and students when selecting postsecondary institutions.

The U.S. Department of Education has published the "positive list" of schools that are accredited by accrediting agencies recognized by the Secretary of Education.  The list can be found at http://ope.ed.gov/accreditation.  This is a list of postsecondary institutions and programs that have chosen to be accredited by accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education.  One of the reasons that institutions seek accreditation is so that their students are eligible to receive federal student aid or other federal benefits.  The database does not include postsecondary educational institutions and programs that elect not to seek accreditation but nevertheless may provide a quality postsecondary education.  The positive list is simply one source of information; you may need to consult other sources if an institution does not appear on the positive list.

To find out more about diploma mills, accreditation and accrediting agencies, click on the links below:

**Diploma Mills**

- Defining Diploma Mills
- Fake Accrediting Agencies
- Foreign Institutions and Diploma Mills
- Foreign Credential Evaluation
- College Credit for Life Experience
- .edu Internet Address
- Scholarship Scams

**Accreditation**

- Recognized Accrediting Agencies
- Unrecognized Accrediting Agencies
- Accredited Institutions
- Unaccredited Institutions

**Resources and Publications**

|Last Modified: 01/21/2009
|-------------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09706]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Sunshine Act Notice; Correction

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) published 
a document in the Federal Register on April 2, 2015, (80 FR 17735), 
concerning notice of a public meeting and hearing on April 29, 2015, 
regarding the underground recovery of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 
and safe resumption of waste operations. That notice stated that the 
Board would be setting aside time for three public comment periods: (1) 
At the conclusion of Sessions II; (2) at the conclusion of Session III; 
and (3) just prior to the Board beginning deliberations in Session IV. 
The Board wishes to correct that statement to indicate that opportunity 
for public comment is limited to just two comment periods: (1) At the 
conclusion of Session II; and (2) just prior to the Board's 
deliberations in Session IV.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Welch, General Manager, Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, 
Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 2, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-07648, on 
page 17736, under the ``Supplementary Information'' caption, first 
column, lines 62--68, correct the statement to read:

    The Board is setting aside time at the end of Session II for 
presentations and comments from the public. The public will be given 
one final opportunity for comment before the Board begins 
deliberations in Session IV.

    Dated: April 21, 2015.
Jessie H. Roberson,
Vice-Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2015-09706 Filed 4-22-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
```