alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018459EN.01000501.xml

| 20.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 December 2018

(2018/C 459/07)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1405 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4676 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90318 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3393 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1328 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9375 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,765 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,90 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2833 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,0860 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5879 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5332 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9241 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6630 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5623 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 284,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2602 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8683 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4190 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 471,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7661 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,535 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,0444 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,311 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4515 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,8738 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,1160 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1405

JPY

Japanese yen

128,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4676

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90318

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3393

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1328

ISK

Iceland króna

138,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9375

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,765

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,90

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2833

RON

Romanian leu

4,6655

TRY

Turkish lira

6,0860

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5879

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5332

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9241

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6630

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5623

KRW

South Korean won

1 284,20

ZAR

South African rand

16,2602

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8683

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4190

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 471,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7661

PHP

Philippine peso

60,535

RUB

Russian rouble

77,0444

THB

Thai baht

37,311

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4515

MXN

Mexican peso

22,8738

INR

Indian rupee

80,1160

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2019103EN.01000402.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/4

---

Assignment of the Vice-President and the Presidents of Chambers of five Judges to Chambers of three Judges

(2019/C 103/04)

At its general meeting of 26 February 2019, the Court decided, in addition, to assign the Vice-President and the Presidents of Chambers of five Judges to Chambers of three Judges for all cases in which they perform the duties of Judge Rapporteur and which are allocated by the Court to such a chamber.

By application of Article 11(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court therefore decides to assign Ms Silva de Lapuerta and Mr Bonichot to the Sixth Chamber, Mr Arabadjiev to the Seventh Chamber, Ms Prechal to the Eighth Chamber, Mr Vilaras to the Ninth Chamber and Mr Regan to the Tenth Chamber, for the period from 26 February 2019 to 6 October 2021.

---
# C_2020298EN.01000201.xml

| 8.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 September 2020

(2020/C 298/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1824 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4411 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89835 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3690 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0809 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 164,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,5453 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,468 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,92 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4504 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8555 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,8168 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6232 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5484 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1641 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7642 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6160 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 405,09 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,7654 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0789 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5360 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 490,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9158 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,547 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 89,8231 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,092 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2664 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,5127 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 86,8485 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1824

JPY

Japanese yen

125,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4411

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89835

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3690

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0809

ISK

Iceland króna

164,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,5453

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,468

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,92

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4504

RON

Romanian leu

4,8555

TRY

Turkish lira

8,8168

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6232

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5484

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1641

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7642

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6160

KRW

South Korean won

1 405,09

ZAR

South African rand

19,7654

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0789

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5360

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 490,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9158

PHP

Philippine peso

57,547

RUB

Russian rouble

89,8231

THB

Thai baht

37,092

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2664

MXN

Mexican peso

25,5127

INR

Indian rupee

86,8485

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony Eric Isaac, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of The BOC Group plc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: December 10, 2003

                                                      /s/ Anthony Eric Isaac
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                          Anthony Eric Isaac
                                                           Chief Executive
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Alfred E. Dies, Relator, v. Thomas H. Ramsden, as Warden of Nassau County Jail, Respondent.

Motion by relator to dispense with printing on appeal from a *decision*of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus. Motion denied, with leave to renew upon the District Attorney’s entry of an order upon the decision and service of a copy of such order upon the defendant; and after the relator shall have filed and served a timely notice of appeal from said order. No appeal lies from a decision. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
# C_2020399EN.01000202.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/2

---

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (urgent preliminary ruling procedure)

(2020/C 399/03)

At its General Meeting on 29 September 2020, the Court designated the First and the Fifth Chambers as the Chambers that are, in accordance with Article 11(2) of the Rules of Procedure, responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of those Rules, for the period from 7 October 2020 to 6 October 2021.

---
3.904-2 Procedures for investigating complaints. ( a ) Investigation of complaints will be in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4712(b).
( b ) Upon completion of the investigation, the head of the agency shall ensure that the report of findings has been provided by the Inspector General to the head of the agency and to— ( 1 ) The complainant and any person acting on the complainant's behalf; and
( 2 ) The contractor and/or subcontractor alleged to have committed the violation.
( c ) The complainant, contractor, and/or subcontractor shall be afforded the opportunity to submit a written response to the report of findings to the head of the agency and the Office of Inspector General in a time and manner that permits the agency head to take action not later than 30 days after receiving the report, as required by 3.905-1(a).
[88 FR 69521, Oct. 5, 2023]
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 30873

PAM MILETELLO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. R M R MECHANICAL, INCORPORATED; SANDRA BELLGARD MILETELLO,

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:16

- CV

- 1623

Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * “This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). “ Federal appellate courts have jurisdiction over appeals only from (1) a final decision under 28 U.S.C. § 1291; (2) a decision that is deemed final due to jurisprudential exception or that has been properly certified as final pursuant

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precede nt except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 7, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-30873 Document: 00514589974 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2018No. 17

- 30873

2 to F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 54( b); and (3) interlocutory orders that fall into specific classes, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), or that have been properly certified for appeal by
the distr ict court, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).” Askanase v. Livingwell
, Inc. , 981 F.2d 807, 809

– 10 (5th Cir. 1993). The App ellant, Pam Miletello, purports to invoke this court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, which grants the federal courts of appeals jurisdiction

over “all final decisions of the district courts of the United States.” A final decision requires the district court to either dispose of all parties and all claims or otherwise expressly permit an appeal under Rule 54(b)

. Charles v. Atkins , 826 F.3d 841, 842 (5th Cir. 2016). In her complaint, Pam Miletello named three defenda nts: RMR Mechanical, Inc., Sandra B. Miletello , and T he Succession of Gerald Miletello. The district court dismissed Pam’s claims against The Succession of Gerald
Miletello and Sandra B. Miletello. However, Pam’s claims against RMR remain, and the district court has not expressly permitted appeal under Rule 54(b). Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction

. The appeal is DIS MISSED. Case: 17-30873 Document: 00514589974 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/07/2018
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of V.G.R., a Child

No. 06-20-00060-CV

Appeal from the 330th District Court of 

Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. DF-16-

14180). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss 

and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs incurred by reason of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 14, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 47 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal 

the sixteenth article of amendment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Mr. DAVIDSON (for himself, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, and Mr. PERRY) submitted the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to repeal the sixteenth article of amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), 

4 SECTION 1. That the following article is proposed as 

5 an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, 

6 which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part 

7 of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of 

8 three-fourths of the several States within seven years after 

9 the date of its submission for ratification: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 47 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Effective 2 years after the ratification of this article 

3 of amendment, the sixteenth article of amendment to the 

4 Constitution of the United States is repealed, and the 

5 Congress shall have no power to lay and collect taxes on 

6 incomes, from whatever source derived, except in time of 

7 war declared by the Congress.’’. 

8 SEC. 2. Not later than 180 days after the ratification 

9 of the article of amendment in section 1, the Secretary 

10 of the Treasury shall submit a report to Congress con11 taining recommendations for any legislation that may be 

12 necessary to implement such article. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
129 STAT. 550 PUBLIC LAW 114–64—OCT. 7, 2015 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 261: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–248 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015): 

May 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 24, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–64 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 200 NW 4th Street in Oklahoma 

City, Oklahoma, as the William J. Holloway, Jr. United States Courthouse. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. WILLIAM J. HOLLOWAY, JR. UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse located at 

200 NW 4th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘William J. Holloway, Jr. United States 

Courthouse’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

to be a reference to the ‘‘William J. Holloway, Jr. United States 

Courthouse’’. 

Approved October 7, 2015. 

Oct. 7, 2015 

[S. 261] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLAWLAW
FORM APPROVED OMB No . 2120 - 0042 U NITED S T ATES OF AM E RICA DE PARTMEN T OF T RANSPORTA TI O N FEDERAL AV IATION ADMIN I STRATION-M I KE MONRONEY AERONAUT I CAL CENTER AIRCRAFT REGISTRAT I ON APPLICATION CERT: I SSUE DATE U NI TED STATES N REGISTRATION NUMBER FOR FAA USE ONLY TYPE OF R EG I STRA TI O N (Check O ne box) D 1. I ndividual D 2. Part ne rs hip**~Corporati on**  D 4. Co-Owner D 5. Government D 8. Non - Citizen Corpora t io n D 9. Non -C i tizen Corpo ra ti on Co-Owner NAM E OR APPLICANT (Person(s) shown on evidence of ownersh ip. Ifi ndividua l,g ive last name ,f irst name, and middle initial.) 417 D('o nQ._ 1? M A,9:t: n_9 LLc 1'**re~~** "' 1 w**~I'** ,c. l'Y\_ L -:) PRt :p f\IZ..S -tl)'0 l 'D**~** YH .. 1 --s-' "";:"E LEPHONE N U MB E R:(l{ /7 )3 00 Ll?St.f ADDR E SS (Permanen t mail in g add ress f or first appl i ca nt on list) (If P. O. Box is used. physical address must also be shown.) Numb er and street: ::Jl Jd**w~+** 6-<d.cio'Y\**~og,J** Rural Route: P.O. Bo x: CITY STATE Z IP COD E**Oz~Rk** IV\ 0 l-:,5?':;.1

D CHECK HERE IF YOU ARE ONLY REPORTING A CHANGE OF ADDRESS ATTENTION! Read the following statement before signing this application. This portion MUST be completed . A false or dishonest answer to any question in t his application may be grounds for pu n ishm ent by fin e and/or imp ri sonment (U .S. Code. T itle 18, Sec. 10 01).CERTIFICATION 1 /WE CERTI FY: \1) That the above a irc raft is owned by the u nd ers i gned applicant, who is a citizen (inc l uding corporations) OJ.- of the U nit ed States.

_ (For voting trust, give n a me of trust ee : ), or· C H ECK ON E AS APPROP R IATE: a.0 A resident alien, wi th alien registra t io n ( Form 1-151 or Fo rm 1- 551) No. b.0 A non-ci ti zen co rporation organ i zed and do i ng business u nd e r t he laws of (state) and said aircraft is b ased and primar ily used in the United S ta tes . Records or flight hours are available for inspect i on at (2) That the a ircraft is no t registered under the l aws of any for eign country; and (3) That lega l evidence of ownership is attached or has been fil ed with the F ederal Aviation Administ r ati on. NOTE: If executed for co-ownership a ll app l ican ts must sign. Use re verse side if necessary. TYPE OR PRINT NAME BELOW SIGNATURE SIGNA TU RE TITLE DATE (/)f- .

- (/)":£ I=>z >-::;

- u. zoz- SIGNA TU RE TITLE DATE ,_o o**a:~UJ** <(<(Z 0..0(!) I::iC/5 SIGNA TU RE TITLE DATE oo.. w**~~CD** NOTE Pending receipt of the Certi f icate of Ai r craft Re gis t ration, the air cr aft m ay be ope r ated for a period not in excess of 90 days. during w hi ch ti me t he PI NK copy of th is a pp lica ti on m us t be carr ie d in the ai rcraft . AC F orm 8050-1 (5/ 1 2) (NS N 005 2-0 0-6 28-9007 )
# C_2017200EN.01000201.xml

| 23.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8494 — Ardian France/Lasalle Investment Management/Europa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 200/03)

On 9 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8494. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8494. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### Sigbert J. Levi, trading as Rolled Steel Products Company, and Alvin L. Bear, trading as Bear Steel & Wire Company, plaintiffs in error, v. Charles E. Coles, trading as Charles E. Coles & Company, defendant in error.

Gen. No. 30,388.

Action for purchase price of goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant upon claim of set-off. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

Rehearing denied June 29, 1926.

Greatman *&*Markus, for Alvin L. Bear, plaintiff in error.

Haffenberg, Kopald & Burns, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00374-CR

Michael Duane Barnett

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1342419D)

November 20, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
# FY 2016 Grantees
#### 415.606 Agency procedures.

HCAs are responsible for establishing the procedures for control of unsolicited proposals required by FAR 15.606(a) and for identifying the contact points as required by FAR 15.606(b).