alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020380EN.01000501.xml

| 11.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2020/C 380/05)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Portugal

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Portugal

Subject of commemoration: 730th anniversary of the University of Coimbra

Description of the design: The design depicts the tower of University of Coimbra and a visual composition of triangles representing the roofs of the university of Coimbra, the highest is of the Joanina Library within the lettering ‘UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA 730 ANOS PORTUGAL 2020’ (English – UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA 730 YEARS PORTUGAL 2020).

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 360 000

Date of issue: November 2020

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Mouldtec, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04249

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Pagter & Partners International B.V., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, September 18, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall:Status hearing held on

9/18/2014, Motion to compel [117] is denied. The Court enters the PROPOSED

REVISED AGREED SCHEDULE FOR REMAINING EVENTS UNDER THE LOCAL

PATENT RULES: Re−opening of Fact Discovery August 7, 2014.Discovery re Opinions

of Counsel August 14, 2014 (35 days before close of factdiscovery period before

9/18/2014): Close of Fact Discovery After Claim Construction Ruling September 18,

2014(42 days after Court enters cc ruling from 8/7/2014); Status Hearing September 22,

2014 (9:00 a.m.); Identity of Experts with Burden of Proof September 25, 2014 (7 days

after close of factdiscovery from 9/18/2014); Expert Reports of Parties with Burden of

Proof October 9, 2014 (21 days after close of fact discovery from 9/18/14); Identity of

Rebuttal Experts October 16, 2014 (7 days after initial expertreports from 10/9/2014);

Rebuttal Expert Reports November 13, 2014 (35 days after initial expert reports from

10/9/2014); Completion of Expert Witness Depositions/Expert Discovery December 18,

2014 (35 days after exchange ofexpert rebuttal reports from 11/13/2014); Dispositive

Motions Filed January 15, 2015 (28 days after close of expert discovery from

12/18/2014); Responses to Dispositive Motions February 12, 2015 (28 days after

dispositive motions are filed from 1/15/2015); Replies in Support of Dispositive Motions

February 26, 2015 (14 days after responses to dispositive motions from2/12/2015). Status

hearing is stricken for 9/22/2014. Advised in open court notice(tsa, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04249 Document #: 121 Filed: 09/18/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1151
No. 89-1488.

#### Joshua Basin Partnership et al. *v.*United States Department of the Interior.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
232.470 Advance payment pool. ( a ) An advance payment pool agreement— ( 1 ) Is a means of financing the performance of more than one contract held by a single contractor;
( 2 ) Is especially convenient for the financing of cost-type contracts with nonprofit educational or research institutions for experimental or research and development work when several contracts require financing by advance payments. When appropriate, pooled advance payments may also be used to finance other types of contracts held by a single contractor; and
( 3 ) May be established— ( i ) Without regard to the number of appropriations involved;
( ii ) To finance contracts for one or more department(s) or contracting activity(ies); or
( iii ) In addition to any other advance payment pool agreement at a single contractor location when it is more convenient or otherwise preferable to have more than one agreement.
#### 30.202-1 General requirements.

See 48 CFR 9903.202-1.

[61 FR 18917, Apr. 29, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 40237, July 25, 1997; 85 FR 67614, Oct. 23, 2020]
# C_2017357EN.01000101.xml

| 23.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 357/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 347, 16.10.2017

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 338, 9.10.2017

OJ C 330, 2.10.2017

OJ C 318, 25.9.2017

OJ C 309, 18.9.2017

OJ C 300, 11.9.2017

OJ C 293, 4.9.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27403]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8952]

Notice of Meeting of Advisory Committee on International Law

    A meeting of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on 
International Law will take place on Monday, December 15, from 10:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the George Washington University Law School, 
Michael K. Young Faculty Conference Center, 716 20th Street NW., 5th 
Floor, Washington, DC. Acting Legal Adviser Mary McLeod will chair the 
meeting, which will be open to the public up to the capacity of the 
conference room. The meeting will include discussions on a variety of 
international law topics.
    Members of the public who wish to attend should contact the Office 
of the Legal Adviser by December 11 at lermanjb@state.gov or 202-776-
8442 and provide their name, professional affiliation, address, and 
phone number. A valid photo ID is required for admission to the 
meeting. Attendees who require reasonable accommodation should make 
their requests by December 8. Late requests will be considered but 
might not be possible to accommodate.

    Dated: November 12, 2014.
Jonas Lerman,
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Executive Director, 
Advisory Committee on International Law, United States Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2014-27403 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Key Staff

Matthew Robinson and Mark BladelE-mail: seminarsabroad@ed.gov

## Mailing Address

U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Postsecondary Education International and Foreign Language EducationFulbright-Hays Seminars Abroad Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Washington, DC 20202Main Telephone: (202) 453-6950Fax: (202) 453-5780

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 32.800 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for the assignment of claims under the Assignment of Claims Act of 1940, as amended, (31 U.S.C. 3727, 41 U.S.C. 6305) (hereafter referred to as *the Act*).

[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 2665, Jan. 17, 1986; 79 FR 24212, Apr. 29, 2014]
# C_2021072EN.01000101.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2021/C 72/01)

Last publication

OJ C 62, 22.2.2021

Past publications

OJ C 53, 15.2.2021

OJ C 44, 8.2.2021

OJ C 35, 1.2.2021

OJ C 28, 25.1.2021

OJ C 19, 18.1.2021

OJ C 9, 11.1.2021

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AIJSJTIN.TIIXAS 78711

August 22, 1975 The Honorable Tim Curry Criminal District Attorney Tarrant County Courthouse Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Opinion No. H- 672 Re: Whether juvenile probation officers are covered by theCounty Civil Service Act. Dear Mr. Curry:

You have requested our opinion concerning whether juvenile probation officers are “employees” within the operation ofthe County Civil Service Act, article 2372h-6, V. T.C.S.

InAttorney General Opinion H-619 (1975) we found that adult probation officers were not subject tothe County Civil Service Act, since we believed the control exercised by district judges over adult probation was inconsistent with the authority ofthe Civil Service Commission concerning employees subject to the Act. We believe the rationale ofH-619 is applicable toyour question and that thejuvenile probation officers ofTarrant County are not subject to the County Civil Service Act.

Article 5139, V. T. C.S., provides that the district judges and county judge shall constitute the Juvenile Board of counties having apopulation of 100, 000 or over. Since article 5142c-2 requires the chief juvenile probation officer tobe appointed by the Board, and assistants tobe appointed subject to the Board’s approval, inour view the various judges exercise adegree of control over juvenile probation officers which would be inconsistent with the powers ofa County Civil Service Commission. See Attorney General Opinion H-619. - SUMMARY Juvenile probation officers of Tarrant County are not subject to the County Civil Service Act. /3Cery truly yours:

Attorney General ofTexas

p. 2928The Honorable Tim Curry - Page 2 (H-672)

Opinion Committee jad:

p. 2929
(October 21, 1963)

#### In the Matter of Robert G. Anderson, Appellant, v. Ann C. Jeandheur, Respondent.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 20, 1963 on consent. Motion granted; appeal dismissed, without costs; no appeal lies from an order made on consent. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

d0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

136962(47)

JOHN H. RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136962 COA: 281591 Wayne CC: 07-703148-NM TODD R. PERKINS, Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s January 15, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.

K ELLY 

### , C.J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.
EXHIBIT 12.4

                                WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
                             RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,1999
                                  (Thousands Except Ratio)
                                        (Unaudited)



     Operating Income                                  $60,698

     Adjustments:
        Income taxes                                    23,715
        Provision for deferred income taxes             (2,701)
        Deferred investment tax credits                 (1,297)
        Other income and deductions                        589
        Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
             used during construction                    1,226
                                                    -----------

               Earnings                                $82,230
                                                    ===========


     Fixed Charges:
        Interest on long-term debt                     $20,352
        Interest on short-term debt and other            5,023
                                                    -----------

               Fixed Charges                           $25,375
                                                    ===========


     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                3.24
                                                    ===========
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              SEP-2-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1996
<CASH>                                         171,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,163,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (57,912)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,694,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,150,490
<PP&E>                                      12,260,118
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,532,459)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,736,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,140,068
<BONDS>                                      7,365,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,319
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,863,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,736,700
<SALES>                                     23,195,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,195,052
<CGS>                                       15,721,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,958,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (68,323)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             696,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                608,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (848,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,456,078
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 2, 2015

jam 

# Order

Clerk November 2, 2015

1 52207

KAMI PLASTER

,

Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v SC: 1 52207

C O A: 327389

ROBERT EUGENE PLASTER

,

Defendant

- Appell ant

.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, defendant

- appellant having failed to pay the

partial filing fee as required by the order of September 28, 2015 , the Clerk of the Court is

hereby directed to close this file.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-10335

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARL DAVID CROWELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:00-CR-42-1

--------------------

October 25, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carl David Crowell appeals his sentence following his guilty

plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute more

than 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Crowell contends that the district

court clearly erred in sentencing him based on the Presentence

Report’s (PSR) “actual” d-methamphetamine calculation. He argues

that, because he was unable to find an independent chemist with

the ability to test for drug purity, he could not rebut the PSR’s
No. 01-10335 

-2-

drug purity findings and was therefore denied due process. 

Crowell further asserts that the district court erred in

admitting a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) lab report

because 1) the report constituted unreliable hearsay evidence and

2) the admission of the report violated Crowell’s right of

confrontation/cross examination.

We have reviewed the record and briefs submitted by the

parties and hold that the district court did not clearly err in

admitting the DEA lab report and in basing Crowell’s sentence on

the PSR’s “actual” d-methamphetamine calculation. See United

States v. Alford, 142 F.3d 825, 831 (5th Cir. 1998); United

States v. Davis, 76 F.3d 82, 84 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v.

Vital, 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). 

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32**
**OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, being the duly elected and appointed chief executive officer andchief financial officer of MPSI Systems Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), subject in all respects to the principle of “materiality” that isinherent in financial reporting under generally accepted accounting principles,and subject further to knowledge actually in their possession at the date ofthis Certificate, hereby certify that:
     1. the Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB as amended for the yearended December 31, 2003, complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     2. the financial statements, including notes thereto and supplementalinformation contained in various parts of such periodic report, fairly present,in all material respects when considered in the context of the financialstatements taken as a whole, the financial condition, results of operations andchanges in cash flow of the Company for the indicated periods;
     Executedthis 10th day of June, 2004.                         /s/   Bryan D. Gross   Bryan D. Gross, Chief Executive Officer                       /s/  James C. Auten   James C. Auten, Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the periods covered in the Report. By:
    /s/ Roger H. BallouRoger H. BallouPresident and Chief Executive Officer Dated: November 8, 2004 By:
    /s/ Jay G. StuartJay G. StuartExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer Dated: November 8, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.