alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Richard A. Smith



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard A. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Wyndham International, Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K/A of Wyndham International, Inc.;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Richard A. Smith
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Name: Richard A. Smith Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,585,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,500
<INVENTORY>                                    342,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,597,123
<PP&E>                                         165,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,732,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,388,513
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,478,421
<COMMON>                                         3,239
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,732,498
<SALES>                                        199,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,051
<CGS>                                          165,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,638,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,348,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,348,281)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (719,652)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (4,040,517)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,108,450)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### 352.237-72 Crime Control Act—Requirement for Background Checks.

As prescribed in HHSAR 337.103(d)(3), the Contracting Officer shall insert the following clause:

# Crime Control Act of 1990—Requirement for Background Checks (DEC 2015)

(a) Public Law 101-647, also known as the Crime Control Act of 1990 (Act), requires that all individuals involved with the provision of child care services to children under the age of 18 undergo a criminal background check. “Child care services” include, but are not limited to, social services, health and mental health care, child (day) care, education (whether or not directly involved in teaching), and rehabilitative programs. Any conviction for a sex crime, an offense involving a child victim, or a drug felony, may be grounds for denying employment or for dismissal of an employee providing any of the services listed above.

(b) The Contracting Officer will provide the necessary information to the Contractor regarding the process for obtaining the background check. The Contractor may hire a staff person provisionally prior to the completion of a background check, if at all times prior to the receipt of the background check during which children are in the care of the newly-hired person, the person is within the sight and under the supervision of a previously investigated staff person.

(c) By acceptance of this contract or order, the Contractor agrees to comply with the requirements of the Act. The Act also applies to all applicable subcontracts awarded under this contract. Accordingly, the Contractor shall ensure that each of its employees, and any subcontractor staff, is made aware of, understands, and complies with the provisions of the Act.

(End of clause)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<SUBSIDIARY>
<NUMBER> 004
<NAME>  PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                1,302,389
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                 12,785
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      97,844
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                     4,871
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                              47,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,465,191
<COMMON>                                                   157,230
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                  180,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                        155,335
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                             492,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                 77,812
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                       381,062
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   40,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                    0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                             473,752
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                            1,465,191
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                  321,857
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                         9,668
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 273,900
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 283,568
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                     38,289
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                             867
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                              39,156
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    17,951
<NET-INCOME>                                                21,205
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    257
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                               25,392
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    16,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                   14,022
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                      49,581
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.00
        





</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. MARCUS ANTHONY GAGOT, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 248 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. MARCUS ANTHONY GAGOT, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 249 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 26th day of August, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.
# C_2017054EN.01000102.xml

| 21.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8347 — EQT Fund Management/Getec Energie Holding/Getec Target Companies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 54/02)

On 10 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8347. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8347. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Augustus F. Hawkins Centers of Excellence Program Grants

FY 2023 New Awards
# C_2019125EN.01000201.xml

| 4.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

3 April 2019

(2019/C 125/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1243 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4643 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85390 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4300 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1206 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 134,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6218 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,724 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 320,05 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2930 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7555 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3014 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5794 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4964 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8246 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6551 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5209 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 275,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9120 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5423 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4290 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 939,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5900 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,608 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,3600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,697 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3130 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5195 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,9305 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1243

JPY

Japanese yen

125,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4643

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85390

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4300

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1206

ISK

Iceland króna

134,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6218

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,724

HUF

Hungarian forint

320,05

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2930

RON

Romanian leu

4,7555

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3014

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5794

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4964

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8246

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6551

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5209

KRW

South Korean won

1 275,35

ZAR

South African rand

15,9120

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5423

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4290

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 939,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5900

PHP

Philippine peso

58,608

RUB

Russian rouble

73,3600

THB

Thai baht

35,697

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3130

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5195

INR

Indian rupee

76,9305

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Flow International
Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K/A for the year ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen D. Reichenbach, Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ STEPHEN D. REICHENBACH 
|Stephen D. Reichenbach     
|Principal Financial Officer
|December 17, 2004
#### LEE TWEEDY & CO. v. SCHILLER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Lee Tweedy & Co. against Eugene B. Schiller. From an order of the City Court, both parties appeal. Defendant’s appeal dismissed. Reversed on plaintiff’s appeal.

L. J. D’Auby, for plaintiff.

A. A. Joseph, for defendant.

BLANCHARD,

J. The appeal of the defendant should be dismissed, but without costs, and the order, so far as appealed from by the plaintiff, should be reversed, and plaintiff allowed to amend his complaint, upon payment of $10 costs. All concur.
# C_2019351EN.01001301.xml

| 17.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/13

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2019/C 351/10)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Lithuania

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Lithuania

Subject of commemoration: Samogitia (Lithuanian Etnographic Regions)

Description of the design: The design features a bear standing on its hind legs, with a chain collar on the neck. It has been depicted on the coat of arms of Samogitia since the 16th century. The bear is situated against a shield topped with a crown, which is held by an armoured soldier (a symbol of courage, sacrifice and patriotism) and a goddess with an anchor (a symbol of hope). Below is a Latin inscription ‘PATRIA UNA’ (one fatherland). The design is surrounded by the inscriptions ‘LIETUVA’ (Lithuania) and ‘ŽEMAITIJA’ (Samogitia), the year of issuance ‘2019’ and the mintmark of the Lithuanian Mint.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 500 000

Date of issue: Third quarter of 2019

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
January 16, 1975.

M. P. No. 74-327.

#### Dawn Fanning *v.*Joseph Fanning *et ux.*

*Adler, Pollock & Sheehan Incorporated, Peter Lawson Kennedy,*for petitioner. *Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor,*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

Paolino, J. not participating.
31.205-15 Fines, penalties, and mischarging costs. ( a ) Costs of fines and penalties resulting from violations of, or failure of the contractor to comply with, Federal, State, local, or foreign laws and regulations, are unallowable except when incurred as a result of compliance with specific terms and conditions of the contract or written instructions from the contracting officer.
( b ) Costs incurred in connection with, or related to, the mischarging of costs on Government contracts are unallowable when the costs are caused by, or result from, alteration or destruction of records, or other false or improper charging or recording of costs. Such costs include those incurred to measure or otherwise determine the magnitude of the improper charging, and costs incurred to remedy or correct the mischarging, such as costs to rescreen and reconstruct records.
[51 FR 12301, Apr. 9, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 13024, Mar. 29, 1989; 55 FR 52793, Dec. 21, 1990]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 89 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 89

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2024

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance 
                      of victims of the Holocaust.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR A CEREMONY AS PART OF THE 
              COMMEMORATION OF THE DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF VICTIMS OF 
              THE HOLOCAUST.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on May 

              

 7, 2024, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of 
remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the ceremony described 
in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such 
conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Albert H. Kenyon and another *vs.*William H. Semon, impleaded, etc.

April 24, 1890.

Complaint — Designation of Parties by Initials. — rThe fact that the parties to an action are designated- by the initials of their Christian names is no ground for the dismissal of the complaint, or reversal of the judgment. The proper remedy is by motion to require the complaint to be corrected or amended.

“A. H. Kenyon and A. T. Morse, partners as Kenyon & Morse,” brought this action in the municipal court of Minneapolis against “J¿ S. Semon and W. H. Semon,” and had judgment by default, on October 28, 1889, for $175.18. Oh October 26th, William H. Semon, one of the defendants, appearing specially for the purpose of the motion only, served notice of a motion, to be made November 5th, to dismiss and strike out the complaint because it does not specify the Christian names of any of the parties except by the initial letters thereof. The motion was made on his own affidavit specifying the full Christian name of each of the parties. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion.

*N. H. Miner,*for appellant.

*C. E. Conant,*for respondents.

Mitchell, J.

The practice of designating the parties, either plaintiff or defendant, by the initials of their Christian names, is irregular, and has been more than once disapproved by this court; but it is no ground for the dismissal of the complaint or for a reversal of the judgment. The proper remedy, in such a case, is by motion to require the complaint to be amended or corrected in that respect. The other question sought to be raised is not involved in this appeal, at least on the present record.

Order and judgment affirmed.