alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016409EN.01000102.xml

| 5.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8208 — CPPIB/Glencore/Glencore Agri)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 409/02)

On 28 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8208. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8208. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### Robert Leonard Peterson, appellee, v. Carl Johnson and Olga Johnson, appellants.

Gen. No. 30,656.

Forcible detainer. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George A. Curran, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 13, 1926.

Litsinger, Healy & Reid, for appellants.

Elmer J. Sehnackenberg, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### CLARK, Respondent, v. LYNCH et al., Apellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, ourth Department.

March 28, 1906.)

Action *y*Frederick J. Clark against Michael Lynch nd another.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, ith costs.
# C_2017232EN.01000801.xml

| 18.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 July 2017

(2017/C 232/10)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1462 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87755 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5400 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1012 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3558 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,090 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,05 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2080 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5598 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0511 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4637 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4502 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9460 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5624 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5672 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 292,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8359 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7591 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4111 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 259,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9143 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,087 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,9260 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,581 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6437 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1200 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,7525 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1462

JPY

Japanese yen

128,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87755

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5400

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1012

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3558

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,090

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,05

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2080

RON

Romanian leu

4,5598

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0511

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4637

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4502

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9460

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5624

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5672

KRW

South Korean won

1 292,35

ZAR

South African rand

14,8359

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7591

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4111

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 259,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9143

PHP

Philippine peso

58,087

RUB

Russian rouble

67,9260

THB

Thai baht

38,581

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6437

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1200

INR

Indian rupee

73,7525

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 36.206 Liquidated damages.

The contracting officer must evaluate the need for liquidated damages in a construction contract in accordance with 11.502 and agency regulations.

[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 48249, Sept. 18, 1995; 65 FR 46066, July 26, 2000]
#### Deborah R. Braun, Respondent, v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Appellant.

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 17, 1977, which granted plaintiffs motion for discovery of an accident report and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated November 10, 1977, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated June 17, 1977 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated November 10, 1977 reversed insofar as appealed from, and, upon reargument, motion for discovery of the accident report denied. Defendant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. On the present record it appears that the accident report sought was prepared by defendant’s employee solely in preparation for litigation. The report form was drafted by the attorneys representing *899defendant exclusively on accident cases and related occurrences, and the completed report form was immediately forwarded to them. Moreover, these reports were never used to improve efficiency or for any other business purpose, according to the affidavit of defendant’s region comptroller. Accordingly, unlike the document sought in *Green v Carey Transp.*(38 AD2d 711), which apparently was prepared for the benefit of the employer in his business, this accident report is exempt from disclosure under CPLR 3101 (subd [d], par 2) (see *Reese v Long Is. R. R. Co.,*24 AD2d 581; *Kandel v Tocher,*22 AD2d 513). Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Shapiro, J.,

concurs as to the dismissal of the appeal from the order dated June 17, 1977, but otherwise dissents and votes to affirm the order dated November 10, 1977 insofar as it has been appealed from, with the following memorandum: The use of the form in question was clearly an artifice designed by counsel for the purpose of precluding injured plaintiffs from receiving the benefits of disclosure by the illusory contention that the reports were nondiscoverable material prepared for the purpose of litigation (CPLR 3101, subd [d], par 2). The pretrial testimony of defendant’s employee, that it was the practice when an accident occurred to have a report completed and "sent in to the main office”, warranted Special Term’s holding that the report was not prepared exclusively for purposes of litigation. The form, which was prepared by counsel and states on its face that an employee "when preparing [the] report [should] make two additional copies and give to your supervisor”, also bears that out (see, also, *Green v Carey Transp.,*38 AD2d 711).
EXHIBIT 32.1


                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Denis A.  Krusos,  the  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer  of
CopyTele, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1.       The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended October
         31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                        /s/ Denis A. Krusos
                                       ------------------------------
                                            Denis A. Krusos
                                            Chairman of the Board and
January 18, 2005                            Chief Executive Officer
# C_2019156EN.01000601.xml

| 7.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/6

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2019/C 156/07)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

| | EPSO/AD/372/19 — ADMINISTRATORS IN THE FIELD OF AUDIT (AD 5/AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/372/19 — ADMINISTRATORS IN THE FIELD OF AUDIT (AD 5/AD 7)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 156 A of 7 May 2019.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

R.Q. WARD, J. R. MCFARLANE, G.G. GERDING

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

EVAN W. STEELE

CORPORAL (E

- 4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400029

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

**Sentence Adjudged:** 30 September 2013.

**Military Judge:** Col Michael Richardson, USMC.

**Convening Authority:** Commanding Officer, Headquarters and

Support Battalion, School of Infantry (WEST), Camp

Pendleton, CA

. **Staff Judge Advocat e's Recommendation:**  LtCol M.E. Sayegh,

USMC

. **For Appellant:** CDR Suzanne Lachelier, JAGC, USN.

**For Appellee:** Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

**2 9**  **May 2014**

**---------------------------------------------------**

**OPINION OF THE COURT**

**-------------------------------- -------------------** 

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
239.7410 Cancellation and termination. ( a ) ( 1 ) Cancellation is stopping a requirement after placing of an order but before service starts.
( 2 ) Termination is stopping a requirement after placing an order and after service starts.
( b ) Determine cancellation or termination charges under the provisions of the applicable tariff or agreement/contract.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 85 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively 

to the women in the United States who joined the workforce during 

World War II, providing the aircraft, vehicles, weaponry, ammunition, 

and other material to win the war and who were referred to as ‘‘Rosie 

the Riveter’’, in recognition of their contributions to the United States 

and the inspiration they have provided to ensuing generations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Mr. FITZPATRICK submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively to the women in the United 

States who joined the workforce during World War II, 

providing the aircraft, vehicles, weaponry, ammunition, 

and other material to win the war and who were referred 

to as ‘‘Rosie the Riveter’’, in recognition of their contributions to the United States and the inspiration they 

have provided to ensuing generations. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 85 IH 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY 

2 TO PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL 

3 TO ‘‘ROSIE THE RIVETER’’. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

5 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on April 

6 10, 2024, for a ceremony to present the Congressional 

7 Gold Medal collectively to the women in the United States 

8 who joined the workforce during World War II, providing 

9 the aircraft, vehicles, weaponry, ammunition, and other 

10 material to win the war and who were referred to as 

11 ‘‘Rosie the Riveter’’, in recognition of their contributions 

12 to the United States and the inspiration they have pro13 vided to ensuing generations. 

14 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

15 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

16 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 

17 Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JIMMY L. LINDSEY,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR 

COLUMBIA COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 177 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2019, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief, to 

the extent it seeks a writ of mandamus prompting action by the Court of Common Pleas 

of Columbia County, are GRANTED. 

The Court of Common Pleas of Columbia County is DIRECTED to adjudicate 

Petitioner’s pending filing within 90 days. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this 

order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Columbia County.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714909
<NAME> 82I.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          94,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,079
<PP&E>                                      10,327,153
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,001,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,526,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,749
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,510,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,526,765
<SALES>                                        710,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               759,244
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  446,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                312,582
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            312,582
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   312,582
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    44.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 27 (Thursday, February 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Cancer Institute, including consideration of personnel qualifications 
and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Cancer Institute.
    Date: March 9, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:40 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Brian E. Wojcik, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, 
Institute Review Office, Office of the Director, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 
Room 3W414, Rockville, MD 20850, 240-276-5660,<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#74031b1e171d1f163419151d185a1a1d1c5a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96e1f9fcf5fffdf4d6fbf7fffab8f8fffeb8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 5, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-02791 Filed 2-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Gabrielle Stevens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/07/2012 04:37 PM Subject: Emails in relation to EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule 

### John -- two more emails from today for the docket Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 -343-9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Fo rwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 04:36 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/07/2012 04:20 PM Subject: OIRA Review Concluded: EPA DFR Revisions to Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce

Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone: Part II 

### Rick and Jeb, OIRA has concluded review of EPA’s DFR Revisions to Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone: Part II. Please let us know if you have any questions. It has been a pleasure working with you. Thanks, Christine

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 04:36 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/07/2012 04:25 PM Subject: ROCIS open for amendment 

### Hi guys, ROCIS is open for amendment. Please ask OP to upload the final rule and let u s know when it’s there. Thanks, Christine
```

[114th Congress Public Law 60]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 543]]

Public Law 114-60
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title I of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and 
title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to revise the definition of 
         small employer. <<NOTE: Oct. 7, 2015 -  [H.R. 1624]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Protecting 
Affordable Coverage for Employees Act. 42 USC 201 note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Affordable Coverage for 
Employees Act''.
SEC. 2. REVISION OF DEFINITION OF SMALL EMPLOYER UNDER HEALTH 
                    INSURANCE MARKET PROVISIONS.

    (a) PPACA Amendments.--Section 1304(b) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18024(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``101'' and inserting 
        ``51'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``100'' and inserting 
        ``50''; and
            (3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
            ``(3) State option to extend definition of small employer.--
        Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), nothing in this section 
        shall prevent a State from applying this subsection by treating 
        as a small employer, with respect to a calendar year and a plan 
        year, an employer who employed an average of at least 1 but not 
        more than 100 employees on business days during the preceding 
        calendar year and who employs at least 1 employee on the first 
        day of the plan year.''.

    (b) PHSA Amendments.--Section 2791(e) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-91(e)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``101'' and inserting 
        ``51'';
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``100'' and inserting 
        ``50''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(7) State option to extend definition of small employer.--
        Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (4), nothing in this section 
        shall prevent a State from applying this subsection by treating 
        as a small employer, with respect to a calendar year and a plan 
        year, an employer who employed an average of at least 1 but not 
        more than 100 employees on business days during the preceding 
        calendar year and who employs at least 1 employee on the first 
        day of the plan year.''.

[[Page 129 STAT. 544]]

    (c) Deposit of Savings Into Medicare Improvement Fund.--Section 
1898(b)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395iii(b)(1)) is 
amended by striking ``$0'' and inserting ``$205,000,000''.

    Approved October 7, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1624:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### 301.401 Deviations.

Contracting officers are not permitted to deviate from the FAR or HHSAR without seeking proper approval. With full acknowledgement of FAR 1.102(d) regarding innovative approaches, any deviation to FAR or the HHSAR requires approval by the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE).