alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017413EN.01000401.xml

| 5.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 December 2017

(2017/C 413/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1865 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87725 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9635 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1665 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8668 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,557 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,08 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2026 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6215 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6262 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5585 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5034 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2721 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7281 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5992 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 287,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1720 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8532 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5550 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 036,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8210 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,103 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,7763 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,692 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8558 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1016 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,4090 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1865

JPY

Japanese yen

133,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87725

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9635

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1665

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8668

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,557

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,08

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2026

RON

Romanian leu

4,6215

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6262

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5585

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5034

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2721

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7281

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5992

KRW

South Korean won

1 287,92

ZAR

South African rand

16,1720

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8532

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5550

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 036,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8210

PHP

Philippine peso

60,103

RUB

Russian rouble

69,7763

THB

Thai baht

38,692

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8558

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1016

INR

Indian rupee

76,4090

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1


                          INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS
                            OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE



[CERTIFICATE NUMBER             [COMPANY LOGO                  [NUMBER OF SHARES
    APPEARS HERE]                APPEARS HERE]                   APPEARS HERE]

This Certificate is transferrable in                           CUSIP 60741410
New York, NY and Ridgefield Park, NJ                          See Reverse for
                                                            Certain Definitions

                           Mobility Electronics, Inc.





THIS CERTIFIES THAT _________________________ is the owner of



Fully Paid and Non-Accessable Shares of Common Stock of the Par Value of $0.01
Per Share, of Mobility Electronics, Inc. transferable on the books of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon
surrender of this certificate properly enclosed. This certificate is not valid
unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.
WITNESS the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.

/s/ Rick Dahlson                        Dated ________________________
__________________________
Richard F. Dahlson, Secretary [Seal of the Company Appears Here]

/s/Charles R. Mollo                     Countersigned and Registered:
________________________________           Chase Mellon Shareholder
Charles R. Mollo, President                   Services, L.L.C.
                                             Transfer Agent and
                                                Registrar

For value received ___________________________ hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto __________________________________________________ Shares of the
Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint _______________________ Attorney to transfer the said
stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.



<PAGE>   2


Dated
     ----------------------
                                          -----------------------------------
                                               (SIGNATURE)


NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION
OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


The Signature must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks,
Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership
in an approved signature guarantee medallion program), pursuant to S.E.C. Rule
17Ad-15.


Signature(s) Guaranteed By:
On  March 19, 2013 closed a complaint against the University of Virginia (the  University).  The complainant alleged  that the University discriminated against White and male applicants by  considering race and gender as factors  in admissions as a means to achieve diversity in its undergraduate classes. Under  Title VI, strict scrutiny review is applied to the use of an individual’s race  in admissions in federally assisted programs. Under the strict scrutiny  standard of review, the recipient must have a compelling interest for using  race and its use of race must be narrowly tailored to that interest. OCR stated  that the University has a compelling interest in achieving the educational  benefits of diversity, as recognized by the U.S. Department of Education and the  U.S. Department of Justice in the Guidance on the Voluntary Use of Race to  Achieve Diversity in Postsecondary Education.   OCR also found that the admissions process met the second requirement of  strict scrutiny: narrow tailoring. OCR concluded the university uses a holistic  admissions process, and seeks a meaningful mass of students across all  characteristics, not just in terms of racial diversity. OCR found no evidence that the University’s gender-neutral admissions  process was in violation of Title IX.    
     ***Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF (204K)  
Top  Last Modified: 01/15/2020
#### 25.600 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements section 1605 in Division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5) (Recovery Act) with regard to manufactured construction material and 41 U.S.C. chapter 83, Buy American (referred to in this subpart as the Buy American statute) with regard to unmanufactured construction material. It applies to construction projects that use funds appropriated or otherwise provided by the Recovery Act.

[75 FR 53165, Aug. 30, 2010, as amended at 79 FR 24209, Apr. 29, 2014]
32.112-2 Subcontractor requests for information. ( a ) In accordance with section 806(a)(1) of Public Law 102-190, as amended by sections 2091 and 8105 of Public Law 103-355 (10 U.S.C. 4601 note prec.), upon the request of a subcontractor or supplier under a Federal contract other than for a commercial product or commercial service, the contracting officer shall promptly advise the subcontractor or supplier as to— ( 1 ) Whether the prime contractor has submitted requests for progress payments or other payments to the Federal Government under the contract; and
( 2 ) Whether final payment under the contract has been made by the Federal Government to the prime contractor.
( b ) In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1), this subsection does not apply to matters that are— ( 1 ) Specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept classified in the interest of national defense or foreign policy; and
( 2 ) Properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.
[60 FR 48274, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 79 FR 24211, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 61029, Nov. 4, 2021; 87 FR 73899, Dec. 1, 2022]
#### 402.101 Definitions.

*Acquisition official* means an individual who has been delegated authority to manage or to exercise acquisition functions and responsibilities.

*Agency head* or *Head of the Agency* means the Secretary of Agriculture, Deputy Secretary, or the Assistant Secretary for Administration.

*Head of the contracting activity* (HCA) means the official who has overall responsibility for managing the contracting activity (*i.e.,* Chief, Forest Service; Administrator, Agricultural Research Service; etc.), or the individual designated by such an official to carry out the functions of the HCA.

*Senior Procurement Executive* (SPE) means the agency official appointed as such by the head of the agency pursuant to Executive Order 12931. The Director, Office of Procurement and Property Management, has been designated as the USDA SPE.

[61 FR 53646, Oct. 15, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 26994, May 15, 1998]
Exhibit 31.a
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Roger H. Ballou, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CDI Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 7, 2004         By:        /s/ Roger H. Ballou    Roger H. Ballou    President and Chief Executive Officer
31.107 Contracts with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments. ( a ) Subpart 31.6 provides principles and standards for determining costs applicable to contracts with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments. They provide the basis for a uniform approach to the problem of determining costs and to promote efficiency and better relationships between State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments, and Federal Government entities. They apply to all programs that involve contracts with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments, except contracts with— ( 1 ) Publicly financed educational institutions subject to subpart 31.3; or
( 2 ) Publicly owned hospitals and other providers of medical care subject to requirements promulgated by the sponsoring Government agencies.
( b ) The Office of Management and Budget will approve any other exceptions in particular cases when adequate justification is presented.
[48 FR 42301, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 30076, Aug. 12, 1987]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 146 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 146

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services relating to ``Clarifying the Eligibility of Deferred 
   Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Recipients and Certain Other 
 Noncitizens for a Qualified Health Plan through an Exchange, Advance 
  Payments of the Premium Tax Credit, Cost-Sharing Reductions, and a 
                        Basic Health Program''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2024

   Ms. Mace (for herself, Mr. Biggs, Ms. Boebert, Mr. Burchett, Mr. 
   Burlison, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Davidson, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
 Donalds, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Tiffany, Ms. Hageman, 
   Mr. Fallon, Mr. Norman, Mr. Perry, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
    Crawford, Mr. Roy, Mr. Rose, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Hunt, Mr. 
 DesJarlais, Mr. Crane, Mr. Brecheen, Mr. Allen, Mr. Gooden of Texas, 
   Mr. Gaetz, Mrs. Luna, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Babin, and Mr. 
Clyde) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 
 on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services relating to ``Clarifying the Eligibility of Deferred 
   Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Recipients and Certain Other 
 Noncitizens for a Qualified Health Plan through an Exchange, Advance 
  Payments of the Premium Tax Credit, Cost-Sharing Reductions, and a 
                        Basic Health Program''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating 
to ``Clarifying the Eligibility of Deferred Action for Childhood 
Arrivals (DACA) Recipients and Certain Other Noncitizens for a 
Qualified Health Plan through an Exchange, Advance Payments of the 
Premium Tax Credit, Cost-Sharing Reductions, and a Basic Health 
Program'' (89 Fed. Reg. 39392 (May 8, 2024)), and such rule shall have 
no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1515

CHUKWUEMEKA F. MBADIWE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNION REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; JOHN W.

ROBERTS; ROBERT AUSTIN; EDWARD BOWER, in their

individual and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CAROLINA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED;

ROBIN CONNELLEY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (3:05-cv-00049)

Submitted: January 31, 2008 Decided: February 12, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

U. Wilfred Nwauwa, LAW OFFICES OF U. WILFRED NWAUWA, Charlotte,

North Carolina, for Appellant. Charles E. Johnson, ROBINSON,

BRADSHAW & HINSON, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Chukwuemeka F. Mbadiwe, M.D., appeals the district

court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and

dismissing his civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1981 (2000), in which Mbadiwe asserted Defendants discriminated

against him on the basis of his race and national origin by

revoking and restricting Mbadiwe’s privileges to perform surgery at

Union Regional Medical Center. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Mbadiwe v. Union Reg’l Med. Ctr.,

No. 3:05-cv-00049 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### COLES v. INTERURBAN ST. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by Maria G. Joles against the Interurban Street Railroad Dompany.

No opinion. Motion denied, with 310 costs. Order signed.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between New Amsterdam Casualty Company, Appellant, and Mildred Sablotsky et al., Respondents.

Order, entered August 12, 1964, denying petitioner’s motion to stay arbitration proceedings, unanimously affirmed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $75 costs and disbursements to respondents. Petitioner did not even make a pretense, either in the papers it submitted at Special Term or in the brief presented to this court, to deal with respondents’ detailed recital of affirmative and acquiescent statements and activities on its part upon which respondents base their contention that petitioner waived its right to a preliminary hearing or trial. Concur—Botein, P, J,, Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ,
Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of eClickMD, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2002 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Marion Robert Rice, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (SS) 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/ MARION ROBERT RICE
-----------------------------
Marion Robert Rice
Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2002
# C_2019358EN.01000401.xml

| 22.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 October 2019

(2019/C 358/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1173 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4708 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7311 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1002 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1638 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,630 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 329,98 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2788 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7584 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5047 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6240 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4643 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7635 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7432 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5203 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 309,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4831 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9025 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4378 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 713,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6709 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,046 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,1373 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,804 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,6059 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4000 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,1690 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1173

JPY

Japanese yen

121,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4708

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85930

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7311

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1002

ISK

Iceland króna

139,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1638

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,630

HUF

Hungarian forint

329,98

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2788

RON

Romanian leu

4,7584

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5047

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6240

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4643

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7635

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7432

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5203

KRW

South Korean won

1 309,04

ZAR

South African rand

16,4831

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9025

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4378

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 713,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6709

PHP

Philippine peso

57,046

RUB

Russian rouble

71,1373

THB

Thai baht

33,804

BRL

Brazilian real

4,6059

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4000

INR

Indian rupee

79,1690

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---