P u rsuan tt o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, the court ha s d et erm i n ed t h at thi s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 30084 Su m m ar yC al endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. SH AU N W AT ER S , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he E as t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 2: 06- C R

- 354- 1

B ef ore D AV IS, B A R K S D A L E , an d G A R Z A , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Sh aun W at er s, fede r alpr i so ner# 29 998- 034, appeal s t he deni alof h i s 18 U
. S
. C
. § 358 2( c) ( 2) m ot i on fora red u ct i on of sentence based on t h e 1 N ovem ber 20 07 , r e t r o ac t ive am e ndm e nt s t o G ui de l i ne § 2D1. 1, pe r t ai ni ng t o c r ac k- c o c ai ne o ffe n s e s . W a te r s w a s c o n v ic te d a n d s e n te n c e d t o , in tera lia , 170 m on t h s’ i m p ri son m en t f

or co n s p ir in g to d i strib u te an dpo sse ss w i th the i n ten t t o di s t r ibut e c o c ai ne , c o c ai ne b as e , a nd h e r o i n. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Janua ry 6, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 30084

2 “ S ect i on 358 2( c) ( 2) perm i t s a d istr ic tcourtt o reduce a ter m of im p r is o n m e n t w h e n it is b a s e du p o n as e n te n c in gra n g e th a t h a s s u b s e q u e n tly b e e n lo w e r e db ya n a m e n d m e n t t o th e G u i d e l i n e s , if su c h are d u c tio n is
c o n s is te n t w ith th e p o lic ys ta te m e n ts is s u e db yt h e S e n te n c in gC o m m is s io n .” Un i t e d St at e s v . G o nz ale z - Bal de r as , 1 0 5 F
. 3 d 9 8 1 , 9 8 2 (5th C i r. 1 9 9 7 ). A
s e nt e nc e r e duc t i o n i s no tc o ns i s t e ntw i t h t he G ui de l i ne s po l i cy stat e m e nta nd, t h eref ore, i s n ot au t h ori zed by § 358 2(c) ( 2) , i f t h e ret roact ive am en dm en tdoes not h a v e t h e e f

fe c to f l o we r i n gt h e d e fe n d a n t ’ s a p p l i c a b l e g u i d e l i n e r a n g e . U. S
. S
. G. § 1 B 1 .1 0 (a )(2 )(B ). W a ters’§ 3 5 8 2 m oti on w a s d en i ed b eca u se t h e d i stri ct cou rt de ci d ed tha t,
u n der t h e G u i del i n es, i tcoul d n otreduce W ater s’sen te n ce d u e t o hi s c areero f fe nde rs t at us . Tha tde c i s i o n i s r e vi e w e d de no vo . Un itedS ta tes v. D o u b lin , 572 F .3 d2 3 5 , 2 3 7 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 1 3 0 S
. C t. 5 1 7 (20 0 9 ). W at e r s c o nt e nds : t he di s t r i c tc o ur te r r e d b e c aus e W at e r s w as s e nt e nc ed und er§ 2D 1. 1, bas ed on t he qu ant i t y of drugs r el evantt o hi s of fens e, r at hert han
u n der § 4B 1. 1( a) , as a c a reer of fen der. Th e presentence i n vest i gati on report ( PSR ) , t o w hi c h W at e r s di d n o t obj ect , w as ad opted w i t h ou tchan ge by the dis t ri ct court. A l t h ou gh t h e P S R s ta te d that W ater s w as a careerof fen der, i tdi d n ot appl y t he o f

fens e l eve lm andat ed byt hatG ui del i ne be c ause t he of fens e l eve lw as notgr eat erthan the ot her w i se appl i c abl e o f fens e l eve lc al c ul at ed under§ 2D 1. 1. If W ater s’base- of

fen se l evelw ere r e duc e d p ur s uantt othe am en ded versi on o f § 2 D 1 .1 , th e o ffe n s e le v e lfo ra c a r e e ro ffe n d e ru n d e r§ 4 B 1 .1 (b )(C ) w o u ld becom e app l i cabl e. W i t h a career- of fen der base- of

fen se l evelof

32, a t ot alof

fen se l e ve lo f 2 9 af t e rt he t hr e e - l e ve lr e duc t i o n f o r ac c e pt anc e o f r e s po ns ibil i t y, a nd a cri m i n alhi st ory cat egory of V I, W ater s w ou l d be su bj ectt o t h e sam e ad v i sory g u id e lin e ra n g e u p o n w h ic h h is o r ig in a l s e n te n c e w a s im p o s e d
. In s u m , a p p lic a tio n o f th e a m e n d m e n ts w o u ld n o t low e r W a te r s ’a p p lic a b le gu i del i n e ran ge. T h eref ore, t h e di st ri ctcourtdi d n oterri n den yi n g a redu ct i on o f se n te n ce . 1 8 U .S .C
. § 3 5 8 2 (c)(2 ); U .S .S .G
. § 1 B 1 .10 (a )(2)(B ).N o. 09- 30084

3 AF F I RMED.