alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

AMCORE Financial, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-10446, 333-775261, and 333-118911) on Form S-8 of AMCORE Financial, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of AMCORE Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annualreport on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. Our report on the consolidated financial statements of AMCORE Financial, Inc. refers to the adoption effective January 1, 2006 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois

March 17, 2008
# C_2020392EN.01000201.xml

| 17.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

16 November 2020

(2020/C 392/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1830 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4480 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89819 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2538 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0819 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 161,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7310 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,353 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 358,16 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4692 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8728 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,1749 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6226 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5476 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1725 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7227 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5934 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 310,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,2346 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7945 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5670 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 680,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8710 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,983 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,5157 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,750 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3930 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,9849 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,0795 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1830

JPY

Japanese yen

124,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4480

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89819

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2538

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0819

ISK

Iceland króna

161,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7310

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,353

HUF

Hungarian forint

358,16

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4692

RON

Romanian leu

4,8728

TRY

Turkish lira

9,1749

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6226

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5476

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1725

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7227

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5934

KRW

South Korean won

1 310,50

ZAR

South African rand

18,2346

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7945

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5670

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 680,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8710

PHP

Philippine peso

56,983

RUB

Russian rouble

90,5157

THB

Thai baht

35,750

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3930

MXN

Mexican peso

23,9849

INR

Indian rupee

88,0795

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 352.219-70 Mentor-Protégé Program.

As prescribed in HHSAR 319.270-1(a), the Contracting Officer shall insert the following provision:

# Mentor-Protégé Program (DEC 2015)

(a) Large business prime contractors serving as mentors in the HHS Mentor-Protégé Program are eligible for HHS subcontracting plan credit, and shall submit a copy of their HHS Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU)-approved mentor-protégé agreements as part of their offers. The amount of credit provided by the Contracting Officer to a mentor firm for protégé firm developmental assistance costs shall be calculated on a dollar for dollar basis and reported by the mentor firm in the Summary Subcontract Report via the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) at *www.esrs.gov*. The mentor firm and protégé firm shall submit to the Contracting Officer a signed joint statement agreeing on the dollar value of the developmental assistance the mentor firm provided. (For example, a mentor firm would report a $10,000 subcontract awarded to a protégé firm and provision of $5,000 of developmental assistance as $15,000 of subcontracting plan credit.) The mentor firm may use this additional credit towards attaining its subcontracting plan participation goal under this contract.

(b) The program consists of—

(1) *Mentor firms*—large businesses that:

(i) Demonstrate the interest, commitment, and capability to provide developmental assistance to small business protégé firms; and

(ii) Have a Mentor-Protégé agreement approved by HHS' OSDBU;

(2) *Protégé firms*—firms that:

(i) Seek developmental assistance;

(ii) Qualify as small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, HUBZone small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, or woman-owned small businesses; and

(iii) Have a Mentor-Protégé agreement approved by HHS' OSDBU; and

(3) *Mentor-Protégé agreements*—joint agreements, approved by HHS' OSDBU, which detail the specific terms, conditions, and responsibilities of the mentor-protégé relationship.

(End of provision)
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

### Current Grant Information

OSEP Grant Award Letters and Funding Tables

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
# C_2018398EN.01001701.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/17

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 398/13)

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Andorra

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country
  : Andorra

Subject of commemoration
  : 70 years of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Description of the design
  : The design of the coin depicts seven staircases (representing the seven parishes or administrative divisions of Andorra) in the shape of mountains that lead to the valley, where there is the name of the issuing country ‘ANDORRA’ and the year of issue ‘2018’. These staircases are, at the same time, the branches of a tree symbolizing humankind, of which Andorra is an integral part. 30 leaves come out of the branches of this tree representing the 30 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Catalan inscription ‘70 ANYS DE LA DECLARACIÓ UNIVERSAL DELS DRETS HUMANS’ (70 years of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) surrounds the design, strengthening this commemorative event.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
  :

Date of issue
  : September/October 2018

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
#### 36.511 Use and possession prior to completion.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-11, Use and Possession Prior to Completion, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated and the contract award amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. This clause may be inserted in solicitations and contracts when the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.

[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34759, July 3, 1995]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JIMMY WILLIAMS

, Appellant,

v.

SCHUWAND MAXIME

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 389

[ August 9, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Michael Davis , Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE 17

- 009591

.

Jimmy Williams, Dania Beach, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

T

AYLOR

, L EVINE and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### 326.606 Representation by an Indian Economic Enterprise Offeror.
#### 428.310 Contract clause for work on a Government installation.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 452.228-71, Insurance Coverage, in solicitations and contracts which include the clause at FAR 52.228-5, Insurance—Work on a Government Installation. If property liability insurance is required, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I.
# C_2021014EN.01000201.xml

| 13.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 January 2021

(2021/C 14/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2161 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4385 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0878 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0812 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 156,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3765 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,190 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 359,66 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5248 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8713 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,1050 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5742 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5510 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4314 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6940 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6146 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 336,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,7269 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8576 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5805 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 201,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9343 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,434 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,0537 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,641 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,6592 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,3010 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,0915 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2161

JPY

Japanese yen

126,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4385

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89440

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0878

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0812

ISK

Iceland króna

156,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3765

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,190

HUF

Hungarian forint

359,66

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5248

RON

Romanian leu

4,8713

TRY

Turkish lira

9,1050

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5742

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5510

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4314

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6940

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6146

KRW

South Korean won

1 336,38

ZAR

South African rand

18,7269

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8576

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5805

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 201,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9343

PHP

Philippine peso

58,434

RUB

Russian rouble

90,0537

THB

Thai baht

36,641

BRL

Brazilian real

6,6592

MXN

Mexican peso

24,3010

INR

Indian rupee

89,0915

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# FY 23 RPED New Awards
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our reports dated January 16, 2003, except for Note X as to which
the date is March 6, 2003 accompanying the consolidated financial statements
included in the 2002 Annual Report of First Colonial Group, Inc. on Form10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of First Colonial Group,
Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-84400, effective September 27, 1994, File No.
333-24745, effective April 8, 1997, and File No. 333-65426, effective July 19,
2001).



/s/ Grant Thornton
--------------------------
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2003
#### Ossie Robert TRADER, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-40121

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 17, 2008.

Ossie Robert Trader, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ossie Robert Trader, federal prisoner # 32019-066, was convicted of armed bank robbery and using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, and he was sentenced to serve 248 months in prison. He filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition to challenge his convictions and to raise a claim related to his fine, and he now appeals the district court’s dismissal of his § 2241 petition. Trader argues that his Speedy Trial rights were violated pursuant to the principles set forth in *Zedner v. United States,*547 U.S. 489, 126 S.Ct. 1976, 164 L.Ed.2d 749 (2006), and that his fine is invalid.

Trader has not shown that the district court erred by concluding that his Speedy Trial claim, which arises from events that occurred prior to sentencing, was not Rognizable in a § 2241 proceeding. *See Cox v. Warden, Fed. Detention Ctr.,*911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir.1990). He likewise has not shown that he should be permitted to proceed under the savings clause of § 2255, as he has not shown that his Speedy Trial claim is based on a retroactively applicable case or that he was convicted of a nonexistent offense. *See Reyes-Requena v. United States,*243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir.2001). Finally, he has not shown that the district court erred by concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to consider his claim challenging his fine because this claim did not satisfy the in custody requirement of § 2241. *See §*2241(c); *United States v. Hatten,*167 F.3d 884, 885 (5th Cir.1999); *United States v. Segler,*37 F.3d 1131, 1137-38 (5th Cir.1994).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<RESTATED>

<CAPTION>
1996 Financial Data Schedule (Q3 Restated)
<S>                       <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             6-MOS-Restated          9-MOS-Restated
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1996           DEC-31,1996
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-29-1996           SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                          73,086              66,268
<SECURITIES>                    19,888              24,044
<RECEIVABLES>                   47,649              43,398
<ALLOWANCES>                     1,333               1,450
<INVENTORY>                     48,027              48,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               201,665             195,202
<PP&E>                         136,090             140,933
<DEPRECIATION>                  79,088              82,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 262,462             257,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           66,620              58,464
<BONDS>                              0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0                   0
<PREFERRED>                          0                   0
<COMMON>                           166                 166
<OTHER-SE>                     189,216             192,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   262,462             257,848
<SALES>                        119,355             169,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               119,355             169,464
<CGS>                           58,924              83,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   58,924              83,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                43,526              62,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   (35)                 34
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 370                 502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 25,285              32,746
<INCOME-TAX>                     7,080               8,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  0                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                       0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0                   0
<CHANGES>                            0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                    18,205              23,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .50                 .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .48                 .64



</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 26, 2023

.

________________ No. 3D23

- 216 Lower Tribunal No. F99

- 1602C

________________



### Joseph Seme , Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Teresa Pooler , Judge. Joseph Seme , in proper person. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, for appellee.

Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We deny J oseph Seme’s motion for rehearing, but withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following opinion in its stead. Affirmed

. See Raines v. State , 14 So. 3d 244, 246 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“At least as a general rule, a sentence cannot be challenged after it has been fully served and has expired because any sentencing issue is moot thereafter.”) ; Fillmore v. State , 970 So. 2d 452, 452 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (finding the defendant’s motio n challenging his mandatory minimum
sentence was not moot despite his having fully served th at minimum
sentence because the defendant “ could still benefit from elimination of the mandatory minimum as to gain time” ); Jackson v. State , 96 So. 3d 980, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (finding that a defendant “serving a lif e sentence, and not a term of years,” is not entitled to the benefit of gain time); Wemett v. State , 567 So. 2d 882, 884 (Fla. 1990) (noting that the sentencing guidelines did not allow the defendant “to benefit from gain

- time while serving a life
sentence ”); see also Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher , 656 So. 2d 178, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“A per curiam decision of the appellate court is the law of the case between the same parties on the same issues and facts, and determines all issues necessarily involved in the appeal, whether mentioned3 in the court’s opinion or not.”) ; Seme v. State , 327 So. 3d 1221 , 1221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).
# C_2020095EN.01000401.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/4

---

DECISION OF THE GENERAL COURT

of 12 February 2020

on judicial vacations

(2020/C 95/03)

THE GENERAL COURT,

Having regard to Article 41(2) of the Rules of Procedure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the judicial year beginning on 1 September 2020, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 41(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:

| — | Christmas 2020: from Monday 21 December 2020 to Sunday 10 January 2021 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Christmas 2020: from Monday 21 December 2020 to Sunday 10 January 2021 inclusive,

| — | Easter 2021: from Monday 29 March 2021 to Sunday 11 April 2021 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter 2021: from Monday 29 March 2021 to Sunday 11 April 2021 inclusive,

| — | Summer 2021: from Friday 16 July 2021 to Tuesday 31 August 2021 inclusive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Summer 2021: from Friday 16 July 2021 to Tuesday 31 August 2021 inclusive.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Luxembourg, 12 February 2020.

Registrar

E. COULON

President

M. VAN DER WOUDE

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION


         In connection with the Annual Report of Home Director, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, MICHAEL LIDDLE, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated:  April 1, 2004



                                            /s/ Michael Liddle
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Michael Liddle,
                                            Chief Executive Officer