alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w29






EXHIBIT 10.29




Annual Cash Compensation of Named Executive Officers




The executive officers named in the compensation table in Monsanto’s proxy statement dated Dec. 1,
2008 (the “Named Executive Officers”) have their base salaries determined yearly by the People and
Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors. It is anticipated that such
determinations will occur annually, effective during a pay period in the following January. The
Named Executive Officers are all “at will” employees, and do not have written or oral employment
agreements other than change of control agreements, the form of which is filed, as required, as an
exhibit to reports filed by the Company under the Exchange Act. The Company, upon the approval of
the Committee, retains the right to unilaterally decrease or increase the Named Executive Officers’
base salaries at any time.



The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s annual incentive
compensation plans for all regular employees, including executive officers, which provide for cash
awards. Summaries of such annual incentive compensation plans are filed as exhibits, as required,
to reports filed by the Company under the Exchange Act.



On Oct. 26, 2009, the Committee approved for the Company’s Named Executive Officers the following
base salaries to become effective as of Jan. 11, 2010, and the following annual incentive awards
for the 2009 fiscal year, which will be paid on Nov. 6, 2009:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Base Salary	 	Base Salary	 	FY 2009 Annual
	Named Executive Officer	 	(as of 01/12/09)	 	(as of 1/11/10)	 	Incentive Award
	Hugh Grant

Chairman of the Board, President 

and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	1,403,780	 	 	$	1,403,780	 	 	$	1,070,382	 
	Brett D. Begemann 

Executive Vice President, Seeds & Traits
	 	$	540,000	 	 	$	540,000	 	 	$	265,000	 
	Carl M. Casale 

Executive V.P. and 

Chief Financial Officer*
	 	$	550,000	 	 	$	590,000	 	 	$	275,000	 
	Terrell K. Crews 

Special Assistant to the CEO**
	 	$	590,000	 	 	 	N/A 	**	 	$	275,000	 
	Robert T. Fraley, Ph.D. 

Executive V.P. and Chief 

Technology Officer
	 	$	600,000	 	 	$	600,000	 	 	$	300,000	 









 




			
	*	 	Prior to Sept. 1, 2009, Mr. Casale held the office of Executive V.P., Strategy & Operations.
Effective Sept. 1, 2009, the Board of Directors elected Mr. Casale to the office listed above.
	 
	**	 	Mr. Crews will serve as Special Assistant to the CEO through Nov. 30, 2009, and will retire from
the Company effective Nov. 30, 2009. Prior to Sept. 1, 2009, Mr. Crews held the office of Executive
V.P., and Chief Financial Officer and Vegetable Business CEO.





The Company intends to provide additional information regarding other compensation awarded to the
Named Executive Officers in respect of and during the 2009 fiscal year in the proxy statement for
its 2010 annual meeting of shareowners, which proxy statement is expected to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2009.
# C_2018220EN.01000601.xml

| 25.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 June 2018

(2018/C 220/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1648 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4526 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87663 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2950 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1534 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 126,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4328 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,792 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,05 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3148 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6663 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,4639 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5681 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5459 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1393 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6880 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5822 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 293,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7165 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5689 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3788 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 429,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6621 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,079 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,5314 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,369 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3617 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,5466 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,0300 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1648

JPY

Japanese yen

128,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4526

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87663

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2950

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1534

ISK

Iceland króna

126,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4328

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,792

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,05

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3148

RON

Romanian leu

4,6663

TRY

Turkish lira

5,4639

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5681

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5459

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1393

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6880

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5822

KRW

South Korean won

1 293,76

ZAR

South African rand

15,7165

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5689

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3788

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 429,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6621

PHP

Philippine peso

62,079

RUB

Russian rouble

73,5314

THB

Thai baht

38,369

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3617

MXN

Mexican peso

23,5466

INR

Indian rupee

79,0300

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

RD Film 1, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05810

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

DOES 1−52

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 3, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall:Initial status hearing set for

10/24/2012 @ 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 10/18/2012. (See Judge Kendall's web

page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about status reports). The parties are

to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of

settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for

trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Court's action herein. Lead counsel is

directed to appear at this status hearing.Mailed notice(tsa, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05810 Document #: 7 Filed: 08/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:19
**Predominantly Black Institutions (PBI)**

**Program Competitive Grants**

**FY 2022****Non-Competing Continuation (NCC) Awards**
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 216 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 216

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
      Medicaid Services relating to ``Medicare Program; Inpatient 
 Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System for Federal Fiscal 
     Year 2025 and Updates to the IRF Quality Reporting Program''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2024

Mr. Palmer submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
      Medicaid Services relating to ``Medicare Program; Inpatient 
 Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System for Federal Fiscal 
     Year 2025 and Updates to the IRF Quality Reporting Program''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating 
to ``Medicare Program; Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective 
Payment System for Federal Fiscal Year 2025 and Updates to the IRF 
Quality Reporting Program'' (89 Fed. Reg. 64276; published August 6, 
2024) and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research Committee (AITC) February Council.                    

*Date:*                         February 25-26, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31B, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         James T. Snyder, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601                               ( print page 8213)                            Fishers Lane, Room 3G31B, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5060,                         *james.snyder@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 27, 2021. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-02302 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### 36.602 Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.
#### Edward Salcito, Respondent, v. T-Jay Homes, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover the sum of $1,000 alleged to be due to the plaintiff under an escrow agreement, the defendants appeal: (a) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 12, 1964, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; and (b) from the judgment entered the same date in plaintiff’s favor, pursuant to said order. Order and judgment reversed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements; and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied. In our opinion, there were bona fide triable issues of fact at least with respect to whether plaintiff prevented the performance of the work to be done by the defendant T-Jay Homes, Inc., under the escrow agreement; and with respect to the number of items which were uncompleted under the terms of the escrow agreement. In view of the existence of such issues, it was error to grant summary judgment (cf. *Falk*v. *Goodman,*7 N Y 2d 87, 91; *Stone*v. *Goodson,*8 N Y 2d 8, 12). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 219 

Designating July 13, 2017, as ‘‘Summer Learning Day’’, a day to reflect 

on the importance of providing young people with safe, productive, and 

enriching activities every summer, ensuring the young people return 

to school in the fall with the skills vital to succeed in the year ahead. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2017 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. HATCH) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 13, 2017, as ‘‘Summer Learning Day’’, 

a day to reflect on the importance of providing young 

people with safe, productive, and enriching activities 

every summer, ensuring the young people return to 

school in the fall with the skills vital to succeed in 

the year ahead. 

Whereas summer learning loss widens an already existing 

achievement gap that stays constant during the 9-month 

school year; 

Whereas summer learning loss disproportionately impacts the 

learning of children from lower-income households or 

with special educational needs; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 219 IS 

Whereas, during the summer, students lose approximately 2 

months of grade level equivalency in math computation 

skills and low-income students lose an additional 2 

months in reading achievement; 

Whereas effective summer programs can bridge the eighth to 

ninth grade transition and strategically decrease dropout 

rates of high risk students; 

Whereas only 1 in 7 students received the nutrition and 

meals they needed during the summer of 2016; 

Whereas summer learning programs contribute to the academic and social growth of students, provide safe and 

healthy spaces for children during the summer, and give 

young people the tools necessary for success in school; 

Whereas summer youth employment programs provide young 

people with access to meaningful experiences that foster 

interest in potential careers, encourage financial and personal responsibility, and emphasize community engagement; 

Whereas many organizations, including public agencies, 

schools, libraries, museums, recreation centers, camps, 

and businesses, assist with the personal development of 

young people through summer activities; 

Whereas students who do not receive supervision during the 

summer are far more likely to receive poor grades, exhibit 

behavioral issues, and drop out of school; 

Whereas summer learning contributes to increasing high 

school graduation rates; and 

Whereas summer learning is a crucial component in ensuring 

that all students graduate from high school and emerge 

ready for the next endeavor, which may be to attend college or start a career: Now, therefore, be it 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 219 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates July 13, 2017, 

2 as ‘‘Summer Learning Day’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of the
Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, I, John
I. Bradshaw, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, President and
Treasurer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.


                                        /S/ John I. Bradshaw, Jr.
                                            Chief Executive Officer, President
                                             and Treasurer
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Chemoleum Corporation, Appellant, and Continental Grain Company, Respondent.

Order entered February 17, 1964, denying petitioner’s motion to stay arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to petitioner-appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Respondent seeks damages claimed to have resulted from the alleged breach by petitioner by reason of its failure to tender a suitable vessel to lift the goods involved in the sale of 200 tons of soy bean oil to petitioner, FOB buyer’s (petitioner’s) vessel, Louisiana. The confirmation of purchase and sale dated November 13, 1963 is signed by Pasternak Baum & Co., as brokers. Thereon interlined between the captions “Referee Clause” and “Remarks” is the following: “ This contract is in accordance with the rules of the National Soybean Processors Association now in effect.” The cryptic phrase “Referee Clause” is not meaningful on this record. There is no indication that it tended to convey to the petitioner knowledge of the arbitration clause relied on by respondent. Rule 115 of said Association’s rules provides that all controversies arising out of contracts made under these rules shall be settled by arbitration. The brokers’ confirmation was followed by petitioner’s order of December 2, 1963 addressed to the respondent containing the following clause: *“*This order will be considered null and void unless order confirmation attached hereto is signed and returned by you within one week of the date appearing above.” Petitioner’s order does not provide for arbitration. Respondent did not so confirm petitioner’s said order. The question presented is whether the brokers’ confirmation of November 13, 1963 is sufficient to compel arbitration. The general rule is that a party is not to be compelled to aribtrate unless he has clearly consented to do so. *(Matter of Lehman*v. *Ostrovsky,*264 N. Y. 130, 132.) We hold on this record it does not appear that the minds of the parties met on arbitration or that they intended to adopt or incorporate the provisions for arbitration contained in the rules of the National Soybean Processors Association. *(Matter of Riverdale Fabrics Corp. [Tillinghast-Stiles Co.],*306 N. Y. 288; *Matter of Doughboy Inds. [Pantasote Co.],*17 A D 2d 216; *Matter of General Silk Importing Co. [Gerseta Corp.],*198 App. Div. 16.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
March 28, 2014

Susan Kurland Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs Dennis DeVany Chief, EASProgram U.S.Department of Transportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20S90 Re'; EssentialAir Service at Presque Isle Qoekel

### Bel"e5T-2066-8612- OcT- OOST

_ ,Qo l\ - 01g'~ Dear Ms. Kurland and Mr. DeVany: On behalf of the Bar Harbor Chamber of Commerce, I am writing to express our strong support for the proposal of Peninsula Airways, Inc. to continue providing air service b.etween Bar Karbor, Maine,and Boston, Massachusetts and Islip, NY. PenAir currently offer's nonstop' service between Bar Harbor and Boston. It iscritically important for our community and the members of the Bar Harbor Chamber of Commerce, which rely on this service to Boston and for making connections to Boston's large network of U.S.and foreign destinations., While PenAir's service to (ISP/BHB) isnot an EAS route, the presence of PenAir in our community is largely dependent on their EASservice on the east coast. Penair's presence at BHBallows our employees to make business trips aswe travel agreat deal to promote our destination to potential visitors. Penair service iscritical to tourism in our region. Boston isacore tourism market for Bar Harbor and having Penair in our market allows they to reach our destination easily without having to drive hours from the next closest airport. Members of the Bar Harbor Chamber of Commerce have used PenAir's service to fly from Bar Harbor to Boston and destinations beyond Boston often during the pastcouple ofyears. We have had excellent experiences flying on PenAir's service. PenAirprovides convenient and reliable service, and itsfares are reasonable. The lossof PenAir's service would bedevastating for our community. We very much would like for PenAir to continue this service. Forall of these reasons, we request that the Department select PenAirto continue its subsidized essential air service between Presque Isleand Boston. 

## ~.'.incc.f). reelllY, '. 

# "-JL-,~~
tli'tistdPlieHq;;O' .~. Executive Director Bar Harbor Chamber of Commerce
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2021

Number of new awards: TBAAverage award:	$TBATotal new awards funded: $1,980,000

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov