alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018014EN.01000401.xml

| 16.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 14/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Spain

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : UNESCO's World Cultural and Natural Heritage Sites - Santiago

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The City of Santiago de Compostela was declared World Cultural Heritage by UNESCO in 1985, considering its urban beauty and monumental integrity added to the deep echoes of its spiritual and cultural significance of the Middle Ages: the Camino de Santiago Pilgrimage.

Description of the design

The Camino de Santiago (The Way of St. James) is a large network of ancient pilgrim routes stretching across Europe and coming together at the tomb of St. James in Santiago de Compostela in north-west Spain.

The design reproduces the sculpture of Santiago as a central figure in the canvas of the Puerta Santa of Santiago de Compostela Cathedral. On the left hand side, in semi-circle, is the word “ESPAÑA”, at the bottom left the year of issuance “2018” and underneath the mint mark.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
  :

Estimated number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  :

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 64

 Expressing the sense of Congress that all trade agreements the United 
States enters into, should provide reasonable access and collaboration 
of each nation involved in such an agreement, for the purpose of search 
and recovery activities relating to members of the United States Armed 
 Forces still missing and unaccounted for from prior wars or military 
                               conflicts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2023

   Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Connolly, and Mr. 
   Meuser) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that all trade agreements the United 
States enters into, should provide reasonable access and collaboration 
of each nation involved in such an agreement, for the purpose of search 
and recovery activities relating to members of the United States Armed 
 Forces still missing and unaccounted for from prior wars or military 
                               conflicts.

Whereas the Department of Defense Prisoners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) 
        Accounting Agency must currently approach MIA recovery operations on a 
        country by country basis via diplomatic, civil, and military 
        negotiations;
Whereas countries utilizing mutually beneficial trade agreements with the United 
        States should provide a transparent and efficient process to aid in the 
        recovery of United States POW/MIA personnel;
Whereas the Department of Defense lists 1,578 United States citizens who served 
        during the Vietnam War and are still missing and unaccounted for in 
        Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia despite ongoing investigation and recovery 
        efforts;
Whereas some 72,500 United States personnel remain unaccounted for throughout 
        Europe, China, and Japan after sacrificing their lives during World War 
        II; and
Whereas nearly 7,800 members of the United States Armed Forces are still missing 
        and unaccounted for on the Korean Peninsula after bravely serving during 
        the Korean War: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that all trade agreements the United 
States enters into, should provide reasonable access and collaboration 
of each nation involved in such an agreement, for the purpose of 
search, investigation, and recovery activities relating to United 
States personnel missing and unaccounted for from prior wars or 
military conflicts.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018174EN.01000701.xml

| 23.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 174/08)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Malta

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Unesco World Heritage Site — Temples of Mnajdra

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design features the Maltese prehistoric temples of Mnajdra, a Unesco World Heritage Site. Mnajdra is a prehistoric site consisting of three temples nestled around an oval forecourt. It is situated on the Southern coast of Malta, some 500 meters away from Hagar Qim. Mnajdra is best known for its astronomical alignments and the South temple seems to have been constructed to mark the sunrise on the equinox and the solstice. The Oldest parts of this complex date around 3 600-3 200 BC. At the top right of the design there are the inscriptions ‘MNAJDRA’, ‘TEMPLES’ and the years ‘3 600-2 500 BC’, one underneath the other. At the bottom left there is the name of the issuing country ‘MALTA’ and underneath there is the year of issuance ‘2018’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : July 2018

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2018403EN.01001601.xml

| 9.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 403/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 403/16

---

Call for applications 2018

for the ‘Altiero Spinelli Prize for Outreach’

(2018/C 403/15)

For the second consecutive year, the Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Culture and Sport of the European Commission has launched a Call for Applications for a European Union’s ‘Altiero Spinelli Prize for Outreach’.

The aim of the call is to reward outstanding works that enhance the citizens’ understanding of the EU and help broaden the ownership of the European project. In 2018 the Prize focuses on young people.

There will be up to five prizes of 25 000 EUR each.

The call is open to:

| — | individuals (natural persons) who are EU citizens, |
| --- | --- |

—

individuals (natural persons) who are EU citizens,

| — | non-governmental legal entities established and based in an EU Member State. |
| --- | --- |

—

non-governmental legal entities established and based in an EU Member State.

The call is not open to public authorities.

The deadline for applications is 7 January 2019 at 17.00 CET.

All relevant information and application forms are available at: https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/altiero-spinelli-prize-for-outreach-call-for-applications-2018_en

---
Form of letter agreement amending Restricted Stock Unit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Form of Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Agreement 
 [Date] 
 [Name] 
  

			
	Re:	  	Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Agreement

 Dear [Name]: 
 You are receiving this letter because you have previously been granted Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and in effect, the “Plan”)
pursuant to the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement attached hereto (the “Award Agreement”). Citrix Systems, Inc. is changing the method by which it satisfies tax withholding obligations. Currently, your Award Agreements provide for a
“sell to cover.” We are proposing to amend your Award Agreements to move to a withholding of shares upon settlement of RSUs. By countersigning this letter below, you agree that each Award Agreement is amended by adding the paragraph below
and deleting in its entirety any conflicting provision: 
 Tax Withholding. Awardee shall, not later than the date on
which the Award becomes a taxable event for Federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company any Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld on account of such taxable event. Awardee acknowledges that Awardee’s minimum tax
withholding obligation shall be satisfied through a net issuance of shares. The Company shall withhold from shares of Stock to be issued to Awardee a number of shares of Stock with an aggregate Fair Market Value that would satisfy the minimum tax
withholding amount due. 
 Each Award Agreement, as amended by this letter, shall continue in full force and effect and
shall be subject to the terms of the Plan, as amended from time to time. Please contact Erich Barnes at 954-267-8434 if you have any questions. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	David Henshall
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:

  

 1 








 Schedule 1 
 [Name] 
  

					
	Grant Type	 	Grant Date	 	Shares
		 		 	

  

 2
#### 2839.102 Management of risk.

Contracts involving DOJ Information and Information Systems shall comply with the security requirements prescribed in FAR 39.102 and all applicable DOJ security requirements, including without limitation all DOJ Policy Statements and DOJ Policy Instructions established under the DOJ Acquisition Management Order relating to the Management of Risk of DOJ Information and Information Systems.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------


     In connection with the Annual Report of Home Director, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") and
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  in  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, ROBERT N. WISE, the President and Chief Operating
Officer  of  the  Company,  certify  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March  31,  2003



                                   /s/ Robert N. Wise
                                   Robert  N.  Wise,
                                   President  and  Chief  Operating  Officer

<PAGE>
APPENDIX H: CAC BOUNDARIES
Clean Air Corridor Endorsed by the WRAP
# C_2018013EN.01000101.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 013/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 5, 8.1.2018

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 437, 18.12.2017

OJ C 424, 11.12.2017

OJ C 412, 4.12.2017

OJ C 402, 27.11.2017

OJ C 392, 20.11.2017

OJ C 382, 13.11.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Globe Indemnity Company, Appellant, and Estate of Abraham Baker et al., Respondents.

Order and judgment entered on June 18, 1964, unanimously modified on the law and on the facts to stay the arbitration permanently under Norman Baker’s insurance policy (No. GDL 397255), with $50 costs to appellant. The petitioner-appellant, Globe Indemnity Company, issued identical liability insurance contracts to Abraham Baker and his son, Herman Baker, to cover their separately-owned vehicles. While Herman Baker was driving his father’s vehicle, it was involved in a collision in Ohio with an uninsured abandoned car. Abraham Baker was killed and his wife Lillian and his sons Herman and Lawrence, all respondents herein, were injured. Abraham Baker’s insurance policy contained an indorsement for family protection against uninsured *659motorists in the limits of $10,000 for each person and $20,000 for each accident. Pursuant to this indorsement all involved in the accident sought arbitration thereunder. In addition, Norman Baker’s insurance policy had an identical family protection indorsement and the respondents sought by arbitration to claim coverage under the “ Other Insurance ” clause contained in the family protection indorsement in Norman’s policy. Special Term held that the *“*Other Insurance ” clause in Norman’s policy was excess insurance and therefore stayed the arbitration until it be determined whether there would be any excess amounts awarded above the $10,000-$20,000 limit in the arbitration under Abraham’s contract. The “ Other Insurance ” clause in pertinent part states: “other insurance. With respect to bodily injury to an insured while occupying an automobile not owned by the named insured the insurance hereunder *shall apply only as excess insurance*over any other similar insurance available to such occupant, *and this insurance shall then apply only in the amount by which the applicable limit of liability of this Part exceeds the sum of the applicable limits of liability of all such other insurance.”*(Italics added.) The applicable limits of liability in both Norman’s and Abraham’s policies were $10,000-$20,000. Thus the applicable limits in Norman’s policy did not exceed the applicable limits of Abraham’s policy. The language is clear and free of ambiguity, that since the limits of Norman’s policy did not exceed Abraham’s, excess coverage cannot be applied to Norman’s policy. *(Travelers Ind. Co. of Hartford, Conn.*v. *Wells,*316 F. 2d 770; *Burchem*v. *Farmers Ins. Exch.,*121 N. W. 2d 500 [Iowa].) Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Staley, JJ.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, J. Marshall Dodson,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Key Energy Services, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



By:

/s/ J. Marshall DodsonName:

J. Marshall DodsonTitle:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Date: April 20, 2016
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3173

___________

Ralph Weatherwax, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

Larry Greaser; Joanne Reed; Marian *

Ortbals; Macarthur Woodruff; Urban *

Lock; Lynda Musgrove; Carl White; *

Randy Mobley; Jane Livengood; * Appeal from the United States

Amile Holmes; Carl Jarden; Roy L. * District Court for the

Jones; Robert Berg; Billy Galloway; * Western District of Missouri.

Nancy Bolin; Helen Joyce Jacobs; *

Stanley Ruit; Terry Dunn; Speed; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Radar, Officer; John Callahan; Gary *

Case; James Payne; Blair; Levoy *

Schubbert; George Foster; Kelly *

Malone; Henry Jones; Mike Smith; *

Kenneth Hartley; James Weston; *

Larry Anthony; Michael Alexander; *

Rivers; Larkin; Miller; L. Smith, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: April 7, 1998

 Filed: April 10, 1998 

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judge

___________
The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri. 

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Ralph Weatherwax appeals the denial of his motions for injunctive relief and the

dismissal by the district court of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of 1

the record and the parties& submissions, we conclude that the magistrate judge did not

exceed his authority, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Weatherwax&s motions for recusal, and dismissing Weatherwax&s claims pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and 41(b). See American Inmate Paralegal Ass&n v. Cline, 859 F.2d

59, 62 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 996 (1988); cf. Aziz v. Wright, 34 F.3d 587,

589 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1090 (1995). We also deny Weatherwax&s

motion on appeal for injunctive relief. Cf. Martin v. Sargent, 780 F.2d 1334, 1337 (8th

Cir. 1985). Accordingly, we affirm. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2017137EN.01000201.xml

| 29.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 April 2017

(2017/C 137/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0930 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4383 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84473 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6318 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0831 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3243 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,922 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,38 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2224 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5348 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8756 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4629 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4914 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5004 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5897 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5258 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 243,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4899 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5367 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4640 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 568,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7447 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,763 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,1061 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,785 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4718 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7500 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,2615 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0930

JPY

Japanese yen

121,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4383

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84473

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6318

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0831

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3243

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,922

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,38

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2224

RON

Romanian leu

4,5348

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8756

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4629

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4914

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5004

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5897

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5258

KRW

South Korean won

1 243,69

ZAR

South African rand

14,4899

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5367

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4640

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 568,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7447

PHP

Philippine peso

54,763

RUB

Russian rouble

62,1061

THB

Thai baht

37,785

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4718

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7500

INR

Indian rupee

70,2615

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
219.804-1 Agency evaluation. ( f ) The 8(a) firms should be offered the opportunity to give a technical presentation.
[63 FR 41974, Aug. 6, 1998]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF R EINSTATEMENT

Appellate case name: Jamelle Andrea Peterkin v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 01090

- CR

Trial court case number: 1548100

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

On October 1, 2019, the Court abated this appeal to allow appellant, Jamelle Andrea

Peterkin, to file a motion for new trial in the trial court. On December 30, 2019, the trial

court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record indicat ing that the trial court denied

appellant’s motion for new trial. Accordingly, we reinstate this app eal.

Appellant may file a supplemental brief of any issue relating to the trial court’s

denial of her motion for new trial within 30 days of the date of this order

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ____ January 9, 20 20

___