alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 480 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2018, as ‘‘Silver Star 

Service Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2018 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2018, 

as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

who were wounded or became ill in combat in the wars 

fought by the United States; 

Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to 

help the people of the United States remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill members of the 

Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver 

Star Service Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 480 ATS 

Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of 

America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices made by 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans on behalf of 

the United States through the presence of a Silver Star 

Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying; 

Whereas the sacrifices made by members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans on behalf of the United States 

should never be forgotten; and 

Whereas May 1, 2018, is an appropriate date to designate as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of May 1, 2018, as 

3 ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’; and 

4 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

5 to observe Silver Star Service Banner Day with ap6 propriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

Frederick J. Kapala Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 50227 DATE 2/14/2013

CASE

TITLE

DeKalb County, et al. vs. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT:

For the reasons set out in this court’s opinion in the related case Fannie Mae, et al. v. Hamer, et al., 3:12-cv50230, slip op. at 1-8 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 13, 2013), the defendants’ motion to dismiss [17] is granted and the

complaint is dismissed. All other motions are denied as moot. This case is closed.

Docketing to mail notices.

Courtroom Deputy

Initials

/lc

12C50227 DeKalb County, et al. vs. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al. Page 1 of 1

Case: 3:12-cv-50227 Document #: 47 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:364
# C_2017139EN.01000101.xml

| 4.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 May 2017

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 May 2017

(2017/C 139/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0919 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4372 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6273 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0812 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3878 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,871 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1913 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5485 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8603 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4615 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4990 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4967 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5768 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5229 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 235,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5730 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5267 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4493 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 528,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7159 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,583 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,5464 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,654 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4424 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5365 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,0540 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0919

JPY

Japanese yen

122,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4372

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84440

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6273

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0812

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3878

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,871

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1913

RON

Romanian leu

4,5485

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8603

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4615

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4990

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4967

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5768

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5229

KRW

South Korean won

1 235,52

ZAR

South African rand

14,5730

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5267

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4493

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 528,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7159

PHP

Philippine peso

54,583

RUB

Russian rouble

62,5464

THB

Thai baht

37,654

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4424

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5365

INR

Indian rupee

70,0540

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
3001.105-3 Copies. Official versions of the HSAR are available in the Code of Federal Regulations, as supplemented and revised from time to time by the Federal Register, both of which are available from the Government Publishing Office in paper form. The HSAR is also available in electronic form at *https://www.ecfr.gov/ .* The Homeland Security Acquisition Manual (HSAM), which complements the HSAR, can also be found at *http://www.dhs.gov .* [86 FR 17314, Apr. 2, 2021]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 464 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work 

Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2018 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Ms. HEITKAMP, and Mr. TILLIS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Take Our Daughters 

And Sons To Work Day. 

Whereas the Take Our Daughters To Work program was created in New York City as a response to research that 

showed that, by the 8th grade, many girls were dropping 

out of school, had low self-esteem, and lacked confidence; 

Whereas, in 2003, the name of the program was changed to 

‘‘Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work’’ so that boys 

who face many of the same challenges as girls could also 

be involved in the program; 

Whereas, in 2018, the mission of the program, to develop 

‘‘innovative strategies that empower girls and boys to 

overcome societal barriers to reach their full potential’’, 

fully reflects the addition of boys; 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 464 IS 

Whereas the Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Foundation, a nonprofit organization, has grown to be one of 

the largest public awareness campaigns, with more than 

40,000,000 participants annually in more than 3,500,000 

organizations and workplaces representing each State; 

Whereas, in 2007, the Take Our Daughters To Work program transitioned to Elizabeth City, North Carolina, became known as the Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work Foundation, and received national recognition for 

its dedication to future generations; 

Whereas, every year, mayors, governors, and other private 

and public officials sign proclamations and lend support 

to Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Day; 

Whereas the fame of the Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work program has spread overseas, with requests and inquiries being made from around the world on how to operate the program; 

Whereas 2018 marks the 25th anniversary of the Take Our 

Daughters And Sons To Work program; 

Whereas Take Our Daughters And Sons to Work Day will 

be observed on Thursday, April 26, 2018; and 

Whereas, by offering opportunities for children to experience 

activities and events, Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work Day is intended to continue helping millions of 

girls and boys on an annual basis to examine their opportunities and strive to reach their fullest potential: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the goals of introducing our 

3 daughters and sons to the workplace; and 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 464 IS 

1 (2) commends all participants of Take Our 

2 Daughters And Sons To Work Day for the— 

3 (A) ongoing contributions that the partici4 pants make to education; and 

5 (B) vital role that the participants play in 

6 promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger fu7 ture for the United States. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.32

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF
US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
(As amended and restated effective May 23, 2000)

WHEREAS, US Airways Group, Inc. (the Company") maintains the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of US Airways Group, Inc., as amended and restated as of May 23, 2000 (the "Plan"); and
           WHEREAS, Section 13 of the Plan provides that the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company may amend the Plan from time to time, subject to the limitations set forth therein; and
           WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan.
           NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
           1.        The second paragraph of section 10 of the Plan is hereby restated in its
                      entirety to read as follows:

The Committee may permit individual exceptions to the requirements of this section by
           extending the period in which Options may be exercised, provided, however, that no
           Options may be extended past the earlier to occur of (i) their expiration date or (ii) five
           years following termination of employment.

This Third Amendment shall be effective January 15, 2002, the date of its adoption by the Committee.
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



     We have  issued  our  report  dated  January  15,  1999,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial  statements  included in the 1998 Annual Report of First
Colonial Group,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31,1998.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in
the  Registration  Statement of First Colonial Group,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries on
Form S-3 (File No.  33-21126,  effective July 6, 1989) and on Form S-8 (File No.
33-84400, effective September 27, 1994).



/S/ GRANT THORNTON

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 1999
#### 2852.203-71 Intelligence Related Non-Disclosure Agreement.

As prescribed in JAR 2803.908-71, insert the following provision:

# Intelligence Related Non-Disclosure Agreement (AUG 2016)

(1) The signatory will not disclose any classified information received in the course of such intelligence or intelligence-related activity unless specifically authorized to do so by the United States Government; and

(2) The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) does not bar disclosures to Congress, or to an authorized official of an executive agency or the Department of Justice, which are essential to reporting a substantial violation of law.

(End of Provision)
## Legislation

- Title III, Part A, Sec 320 of the Higher Education Act ( HEA ) of 1965, as amended.  20 U.S.C. 1059g ) |    MS Word  (28K) |  PDF  (16K)
- Title III, Part F, Sec 371 of the Higher Education Act ( HEA ) of 1965, as amended.  20 U.S.C. 1067q )

## Regulations

- There are no program-specific regulations for this program.
- e-CFR --  Part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

Institutional Service Home
#### 28.102 Performance and payment bonds and alternative payment protections for construction contracts.
#### 252.227-7001 Release of past infringement.

As prescribed at 227.7009-2(a), insert the following clause in patent releases, license agreements, and assignments:

# Release of Past Infringement (SEP 2019)

The Contractor hereby releases each and every claim and demand which the Contractor now has or may hereafter have against the Government for the manufacture or use by or for the Government prior to the effective date of this contract, of any inventions covered by (i) any of the patents and applications for patent identified in this contract, and (ii) any other patent or application for patent owned or hereafter acquired by the Contractor, insofar as and only to the extent that such other patent or patent application covers the manufacture, use, or disposition of [description of subject matter].*

*Bracketed portions of the clause may be omitted when not appropriate or not encompassed by the release as negotiated.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 84 FR 48500, Sept. 13, 2019]
# C_2016410EN.01000101.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 410/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 402, 31.10.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 392, 24.10.2016

OJ C 383, 17.10.2016

OJ C 371, 10.10.2016

OJ C 364, 3.10.2016

OJ C 350, 26.9.2016

OJ C 343, 19.9.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32.1


                     Certification of the CEO Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                            as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Niagara
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Scharf, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Scharf
------------------
Michael Scharf
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2004




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section.
# C_2017169EN.01000801.xml

| 30.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 May 2017

(2017/C 169/09)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1214 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4409 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86528 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7275 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0904 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3330 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,413 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1793 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5500 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9967 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5022 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5063 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7372 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5944 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5525 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 255,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4605 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7018 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4305 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 911,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7979 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,924 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,1321 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,363 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6660 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6324 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,4450 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1214

JPY

Japanese yen

125,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4409

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86528

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7275

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0904

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3330

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,413

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1793

RON

Romanian leu

4,5500

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9967

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5022

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5063

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7372

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5944

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5525

KRW

South Korean won

1 255,74

ZAR

South African rand

14,4605

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7018

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4305

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 911,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7979

PHP

Philippine peso

55,924

RUB

Russian rouble

63,1321

THB

Thai baht

38,363

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6660

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6324

INR

Indian rupee

72,4450

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 6, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40307 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MONTY MARCELLUS SHELTON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-81-ALL-LED

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Monty Marcellus Shelton appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and for two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm while under indictment. 21 U.S.C. § 841; 18 U.S.C. § 922(n). He argues (1) that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his convictions, (2) that the testimony of two police officers contained hearsay, in violation of his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, andNo. 04-40307 -2- (3) that his sentence violates Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). The evidence at trial was overwhelming. The Government presented 12 witnesses, most of whom attested to Shelton’s possession of large quantities of methamphetamine pills as well as his activities as a dealer of methamphetamine. One witness testified that Shelton was in possession of at least 30,000 methamphetamine pills. Another testified that approximately 5,000 methamphetamine pills were found in Shelton’s vehicle. Witnesses also attested to Shelton’s possession of the two shotguns charged in counts two and three. This argument is without merit. See United States v. Payne , 99 F.3d 1273, 1278 (5th Cir. 1996). Shelton’s argument that hearsay testimony was erroneously admitted at trial fails. Any error in admitting the testimony was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
See United States v. Cantu , 167 F.3d 198, 203 (5th Cir. 1999). Shelton’s argument that his sentence is illegal under Blakely is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263).
AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Taylor De Leon, Appellant.

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 24, 1975 (the date on the clerk’s extract is May 6,1975), affirmed (see *People v Dixon,*29 NY2d 55; *People v Cataldo,*39 NY2d 578). Hopkins, J. P., Titone, O’Connor and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### 2902.101 Definitions.

The following words and terms are used as defined in this subpart unless the context in which they are used clearly requires a different meaning, or a different definition is prescribed for a particular part or portion of a part:

*Head of Agency* (also called agency head) means the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management, except that the Secretary of Labor is the Head of Agency for acquisition actions, which by the terms of a statute or delegation must be performed specifically by the Secretary of Labor; the Inspector General is the Head of Agency in all cases for the Office of the Inspector General.

*Head of Contracting Activity (HCA)* means the official who has overall responsibility for managing the Contracting Activity, as defined at FAR 2.101, when the Contracting Activity has more than one person duly appointed as Contracting Officers by the Senior Procurement Executive or, in the case of the Office of the Inspector General, issued by the Inspector General or their designee. Each Head of Agency may designate HCA(s) as appropriate to be responsible for managing Contracting Activities within their respective Agency.

*Senior Procurement Executive (SPE),* as defined in the FAR, means the individual appointed pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1702(c) who is responsible for management direction of the acquisition system of the executive agency, including implementation of the unique acquisition policies, regulations, and standards of the executive agency. At DOL, the SPE is also the Chief Procurement Officer and DOL's Suspending and Debarment Official and is the Principal Executive responsible for the Office of the Senior Procurement Executive (OSPE).