alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Who May Apply:** Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) that  meet certain eligibility requirements

IHEs must meet both basic and program-specific eligibility requirements.  All IHEs seeking funding under the PBI program must apply for **Designation  as an Eligible Institution for Title III and Title V Programs.**

Refer to the Tips and Assistance section on the Eligibility page to find more information, the latest webinar schedule, and/or presentations regarding eligibility.

**Additional  eligibility requirements include:**

1. Have an enrollment of needy students as defined by  Title III, Part F, Section 371 of the HEA.
2. Have an average educational and general expenditure  which is low, per full-time equivalent undergraduate student in comparison with the average educational and general expenditure per full-time equivalent  undergraduate student of institutions of higher education that offer similar  instruction, except that the Secretary may apply the waiver requirements described in Section 392(b) to this subparagraph in the same manner as the  Secretary applies the waiver requirements to Section 312(b)(1)(B);
3. Have an enrollment of undergraduate students—that is at least 40 percent Black American students;
that  is at least 1,000 undergraduate students;
of which not less than 50 percent of the undergraduate students enrolled at the institution  are low-income individuals or first-generation college students (as that term  is defined in Section 402A(g)); and
of which not less than 50  percent of the undergraduate students are enrolled in an educational program  leading to a bachelor’s or associate’s degree that the institution is licensed  to award by the State in which the institution is located;
4. that is at least 40 percent Black American students;
5. that  is at least 1,000 undergraduate students;
6. of which not less than 50 percent of the undergraduate students enrolled at the institution  are low-income individuals or first-generation college students (as that term  is defined in Section 402A(g)); and
7. of which not less than 50  percent of the undergraduate students are enrolled in an educational program  leading to a bachelor’s or associate’s degree that the institution is licensed  to award by the State in which the institution is located;
8. Is legally authorized to provide, and provides within  the State, an educational program within the State, an educational program for  which the institution of higher education awards a bachelor’s degree, or in the  case of a junior or community college, an associate’s degree;
9. Is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting  agency or association determined by the Secretary to be a reliable authority as  to the quality of training offered, or is, according to such an agency or  association making reasonable progress toward accreditation; and
10. Is not receiving assistance under Part B of Title III.

**Lists of Eligible Institutions by Fiscal Year**



Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 01/15/2014
|-------------------------
<PAGE>   1

                                                      Exhibit 10.32
                                                      -------------


                                  BIOGEN, INC.
                  VOLUNTARY EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1


      WHEREAS, Biogen, Inc. ("Biogen") adopted the Biogen, Inc. Voluntary
Executive Supplemental Savings Plan (the "Plan") effective April 18, 1994,
and

      WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Plan permits Biogen, by action of the Board of
Directors of Biogen (or its delegate) to amend the Plan; and

      WHEREAS, Biogen desires to amend the Plan to increase the frequency by
which a participant may change his designation of mutual funds with respect to
which deemed investment results are determined;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective May 1, 1997 as
follows:

      Section 5.1 (Participant Accounts) is amended by deleting the second
sentence of the second paragraph of subsection (c) thereof and replacing it with
the following:

      "Thereafter, a participant may change his designation either with respect
      to the deemed investment of future savings deposits and matching credits
      or the deemed transfer of amounts from a previously designated mutual fund
      to another fund. The Committee shall establish the frequency by which such
      a change may be made, the method of making such a change, and the
      effective date of such a change and shall prescribe such other rules and
      procedures as it deems appropriate."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Biogen has caused this instrument to be executed by the
individual duly authorized as of the 25th day of April, 1997.

                                         BIOGEN, INC.


                                         By:
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Frank A. Burke, Jr.
                                             Vice President - Human Resources
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. Lipton, Inc., Petitioner, v New York State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding instituted in this court pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated August 2, 1978, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights finding that petitioner had discriminated against complainant because of her obesity and hypertension, which were disabilities within the meaning of the Human Rights Law. The complainant was refused re-employment by the petitioner in October of 1975 when its medical department determined that this five-foot- and seven-inch-tall woman was obese at the weight of over 300 pounds and also had high blood pressure. There is evidence that she weighed about 318 pounds in October of 1975. The record establishes beyond any question that the complainant was refused employment because of the joint judgment of her supervisor and the medical department that her obesity prevented her from efficiently performing her employment during her last working period of May, 1975 to July, 1975, and was likely to do so in the future. This court has recently had occasion to fully consider what was intended by the Legislature to constitute a "disability” and discrimination in regard thereto within the meaning of sections 292 and 296 of the Executive Law *(Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Averill Park Cent. School Dist.,*59 AD2d 449, 452; *Matter of Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v State Div. of Human Rights,*63 AD2d 170). The import of discrimination based upon disability as added to the Executive Law by chapter 988 of the Laws of 1974 has also been considered in the cases of *Kuhnle v New York State Div. of Human Rights*(40 NY2d 720, 722), *State Div. of Human Rights v County of Monroe*(64 AD2d 811) and *City of New York v Cole*(63 AD2d 558, 559). We find that complainant’s condition is related to her ability to perform her employment. As we have previously stated: "In *Averill Park (supra),*we called for the exercise of common sense and pointed out that the board exceeded its authority and that the board should restrict its intervention to cases in which the alleged disability is unrelated to the nature of the employment. We are constrained to observe that continued unreasonable intervention in cases of this nature cannot but impede or destroy progress in this vital area.” *(Matter of Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v State Div. of Human Rights, supra,*p 173.) Petition granted and determination annulled with costs against the State Division of Human Rights. Greenblott, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Forest Laboratories Inc., et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05030

Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo

Watson Laboratories Inc. (NV), et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, December 19, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: This case is dismissed and

all pending dates and motions are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed

notice (jdh)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05030 Document #: 60 Filed: 12/19/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:581
*Minority Serving Institutions include institutions that would  be eligible to participate in the following programs: Predominantly Black  Institutions, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions, Asian  American and Native American Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions, Native  American-Serving Nontribal Institutions, Developing Hispanic-Serving  Institutions Program, and Promoting Postbaccalaureate Opportunities for  Hispanic Americans. 

### How to Apply for Funding: HEERF  II-Minority Serving Institutions (CFDA 84.425L)

*Note:  New applications are not required. Supplements will be automatically awarded.*

- Grants.gov  Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants
- Guide  to how to apply for funding in Grants.gov 
- How to upload a Workspace   Applicant Overview Training for  Grants.gov  Training Resources for Grants.gov  Endowment Excise Tax Form for Submission  Note: Only institutions subject to the tax described are required to complete and submit this form once.
Supplemental Agreement: (a)(2) Minority Serving Institutions Program (CFDA  84.425L) (NEW)
*Note: This is  for institutions that did not previously receive HEERF MSI funding and that are  included in the CRRSAA Section 314(a)(2). This document is provided for  reference as an example of the agreement that will be attached to your  institution’s supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the supplement  is automatically made*
Supplemental Agreement: (a)(2) Minority Serving Institutions Program (CFDA  84.425L) (Purple)
*Note: This is for institutions that received CARES Act HEERF Minority Serving Institutions Program funding. This document is provided  for reference as an example of the agreement that will be attached to your  institution’s supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the supplement  is automatically made.*
**Notice Inviting Applications:** (a)(2) Supplemental Assistance for Minority Serving Institutions Program (CFDA  84.425L)Formula allocations- Allocations for Section 314(a)(2) of CRRSAA Act
- Methodology for Calculating Allocations
Frequently Asked Questions- (a)(2) Frequently Asked Questions

  Return to the CRRSAA HEERF II Website here.
  Last Modified: 04/27/2021
# C_2017175EN.01000101.xml

| 2.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8405 — Lear/Grupo Antolín Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 175/01)

On 11 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8405. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8405. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
About FOIA | About the Privacy Act | FOIA Reading RoomsMaking a Request | FAQs | Contacts | **Links**

## Links

**Disclaimer**

### Federal Agencies

-  Department of Justice 
- FOIA.gov
-  National Archives and Records Administration
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF



FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



|                                                                  |  |                                                             
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                                                        |  | State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|Caitra Technologies Incorporated                                  |  | Washington                                                  
|CIS Acquisition Corporation                                       |  | Michigan                                                    
|Flow Asia Corporation                                             |  | Taiwan                                                      
|Flow Asia International Corporation                               |  | Mauritius                                                   
|Flow Automation Systems Corporation                               |  | Ontario                                                     
|Flow Ultra High Pressure Waterjet Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. |  | China                                                       
|Flow Europe, GmbH                                                 |  | Germany                                                     
|Foracon Europe Manufacturing GmbH & CO.KG                         |  | Germany                                                     
|Flow Holdings GmbH (SAGL) Limited Liability Company               |  | Switzerland                                                 
|Flow Iberica, S.R.L.                                              |  | Spain                                                       
|Flow Italia, S.R.L.                                               |  | Italy                                                       
|Flow Japan Corporation                                            |  | Japan                                                       
|Flow Korea Corporation                                            |  | Korea                                                       
|Flow Latino Americana Comercio Ltda.                              |  | Brazil, South America                                       
|Flow Surface Prep/Europe, SAGL                                    |  | Switzerland                                                 
|Flow U.K., Ltd.                                                   |  | England                                                     
|Flow Waterjet Florida Corporation                                 |  | Florida                                                     
|Flow Washington Corporation                                       |  | Washington
Performance Period:  five years.

An applicant that receives a grant award will be required to submit annual progress reports and a final report as a condition of the award.  The reports will document the extent to which project goals and objectives are met.

Not later than five years after the date of the establishment of the coordinating center, the coordinating center shall report to the Secretary, the authorizing committees, and the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity on the recommendations of the workgroup.

Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 09/30/2014
|-------------------------
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 30, 2008



/S/    Yoichi
HojoName:

Yoichi HojoTitle:

Chief Operating Officer for Business Management Operations (Chief Financial Officer) Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 4, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2010
3015.606-2 Evaluation. ( a ) Comprehensive evaluations should be completed within sixty calendar days after making the initial review determination. If additional time is needed, then the agency contact point shall advise the offeror accordingly and provide a new evaluation completion date. The evaluating office shall neither reproduce nor disseminate the proposal to other offices without the consent of the contracting office from which the proposal was received for evaluation. If the evaluating office requires additional information from the offeror, the evaluator shall convey this request to the responsible contracting office. The evaluator shall not directly contact the proposal originator.
( b ) If the evaluators recommend accepting the proposal, the responsible contracting officer shall ensure compliance with all of the requirements of (FAR) 48 CFR 15.607.
# C_2017230EN.01002401.xml

| 15.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/24

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

14 July 2017

(2017/C 230/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1415 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87983 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5333 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1051 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3843 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,075 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,51 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2172 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5627 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0663 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4710 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4524 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9132 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5625 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5684 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 295,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0313 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7419 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4080 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 225,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8999 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,772 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,9547 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,645 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6599 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1393 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,4950 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1415

JPY

Japanese yen

129,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87983

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5333

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1051

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3843

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,075

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,51

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2172

RON

Romanian leu

4,5627

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0663

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4710

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4524

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9132

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5625

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5684

KRW

South Korean won

1 295,10

ZAR

South African rand

15,0313

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7419

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4080

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 225,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8999

PHP

Philippine peso

57,772

RUB

Russian rouble

67,9547

THB

Thai baht

38,645

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6599

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1393

INR

Indian rupee

73,4950

---

(1)  
  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Respondent-Appellant.

In an action by a subcontractor to recover under a labor and material payment bond, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 22, 1977, which awarded judgment to plaintiff, but limited its recovery to the balance due under an alleged settlement agreement. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs to the defendant. Plaintiff Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc. was a subcontractor for Carbar Construction Corporation and V.C. Vitanza & Son (hereinafter Carbar-Vitanza), joint venturers in the construction of a new student center at Kingsborough Community College. The defendant Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland was the surety on a labor and material payment bond posted in connection therewith. Because of various disputes which arose between plaintiff and Carbar-Vitanza during the course of performance of the subcontract, they entered into a written settlement agreement in which the contract price for plaintiffs work was significantly reduced. When Carbar-Vitanza failed to make complete payment thereunder, plaintiff commenced this action against the surety to recover the balance due under the original subcontract. Plaintiff contends that the settlement agreement was merely an "executory accord”, which, when not performed, revived the original agreement (see *Goldbard v Empire State Mut. Life Ins. Co.,*5 AD2d 230; *Moers v Moers,*229 NY 294). We disagree. A review of the evidence in this case reveals that the settlement agreement was reached because of the plaintiffs failure to fully perform its duties under the original subcontract. In recognition of this deficiency, the parties negotiated and agreed upon a new, lower contract price. The accommodation which they thus arranged constituted a new and superseding agreement which settled what would have otherwise been a disputed claim. As such, the agreement discharged the earlier obligation and became substituted therefor. Accordingly, Trial Term properly limited plaintiffs recovery to the amount owing under the settlement agreement. Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Gulotta, JJ., concur.