alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
32.503-14 Protection of Government title. ( a ) Since the Progress Payments clause gives the Government title to all of the materials, work-in-process, finished goods, and other items of property described in paragraph (d) of the Progress Payments clause, under the contract under which progress payments have been made, the ACO must ensure that the Government title to these inventories is not compromised by other encumbrances. Ordinarily, the ACO, in the absence of reason to believe otherwise, may rely upon the contractor's certification contained in the progress payment request.
( b ) If the ACO becomes aware of any arrangement or condition that would impair the Government's title to the property affected by progress payment, the ACO shall require additional protective provisions (see 32.501-5) to establish and protect the Government's title.
( c ) The existence of any such encumbrance is a violation of the contractor's obligations under the contract, and the ACO may, if necessary, suspend or reduce progress payments under the terms of the Progress Payments clause covering failure to comply with any material requirement of the contract. In addition, if the contractor fails to disclose an existing encumbrance in the progress payments certification, the ACO should consult with legal counsel concerning possible violation of 31 U.S.C. 3729, the False Claims Act.
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 2665, Jan. 17, 1986]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Title VII, Part A, Subpart 2, Section 711-716 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended
                - 20 U.S.C 1135-1135e

## Regulations

                - 34 CFR Part 648
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR)  in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
                - Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars

Student Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### Jacques A. DURR, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 2007-3162.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 19, 2007.

ORDER

Petitioner having filed the required brief, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of filing of this order.
PUBLIC LAW 111–186—JUNE 9, 2010 124 STAT. 1271 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4238: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Feb. 22, considered and passed House. 

May 25, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–186 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 930 39th 

Avenue in Greeley, Colorado, as the ‘‘W.D. Farr Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. W.D. FARR POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 930 39th Avenue in Greeley, Colorado, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘W.D. Farr Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘W.D. Farr Post Office Building’’. 

Approved June 9, 2010. 

June 9, 2010 

[H.R. 4238] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
Exhibit 23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Aspyra, Inc.


Calabasas,
CA





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (File No. 333-71599 and file No. 333-138795) and on Forms
S-3 (File No. 333-150599, file No. 333-134926, and file No.
333-150599) of our report dated April 10, 2009, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Aspyra, Inc. appearing in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.





BDO
Seidman, LLP





Los
Angeles, California


April 10,
2009
#### 324.104 Restrictions on Contractor Access to Government or Third Party Information.

The contracting officer shall establish the restrictions that govern the contractor employees' access to Government or third party information in order to protect the information from unauthorized use or disclosure.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,526
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,730
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     48,426
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        250,983
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,777
<DEPOSITS>                                     270,155
<SHORT-TERM>                                    18,634
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,464
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 324,777
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,658
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,663
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   209
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,530
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,458
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,547
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,983
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      885
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,962
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,962
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,577
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.42
<LOANS-NON>                                        849
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    58
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    907
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,499
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      393
<RECOVERIES>                                       123
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,114
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,869
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,245


</TABLE>
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**Who May Apply:** An institution of Higher Education or a combination of institutions of higher education.

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
<PAGE>
                                                    Exhibit 3.3

                    CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                               TO

              RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                               OF

                           USAIR, INC.


       ---------------------------------------------------


                   Pursuant to Section 242 of
      the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

       ---------------------------------------------------


     USAir, Inc. a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called the 
"Corporation"), does hereby certify as follows:

     FIRST:  Article FIRST of the Corporation's Restated 
Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its 
entirety as set forth below:

     FIRST:  The name of the corporation is US Airways, Inc. 
(hereinafter the "Corporation").

     SECOND:  The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in 
accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the 
State of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this 
Certificate to be duly executed in its corporate name this 17th  
day of February, 1997.

                                  USAIR, INC.

                                  By:  /s/Michelle V. Bryan
                                       --------------------
                                  Name:   Michelle V. Bryan
                                  Title:  Vice President, Deputy 
                                  General Counsel and Secretary
November 14, 1974.

M. P. No. 74-180.

#### In re Gerard T. Ouimette.

*Gerard T. Ouimette,*petitioner, pro se. *Richard J. Israel,*Attorney General, *Donald P. Ryan,*Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Pro se motion of petitioner for extension of time to file brief and transcript is assigned to the calendar of December 2, 1974 for oral argument.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|November 5, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Richard C. Baylor
    ----------------------------------------
    Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer

May 4, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

AF Holdings LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04236

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Jason Hawk

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, October 30, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Gary Feinerman:Status hearing held and

continued to 11/28/2012 at 9:00 a.m. For the reasons stated in open court, Plaintiff's

motion for default judgment [15] is denied without prejudice.Mailed notice.(jlj)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04236 Document #: 16 Filed: 10/30/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:109
# C_2018136EN.01000201.xml

| 18.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 April 2018

(2018/C 136/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2357 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4474 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3913 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1908 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5980 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,254 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1602 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6468 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,0734 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5910 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5511 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7001 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6837 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6192 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 320,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8492 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7639 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4135 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 021,77 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8058 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,594 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,3214 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,566 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2158 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,2075 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,1080 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2357

JPY

Japanese yen

132,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4474

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86280

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3913

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1908

ISK

Iceland króna

122,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5980

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,254

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1602

RON

Romanian leu

4,6468

TRY

Turkish lira

5,0734

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5910

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5511

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7001

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6837

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6192

KRW

South Korean won

1 320,61

ZAR

South African rand

14,8492

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7639

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4135

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 021,77

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8058

PHP

Philippine peso

64,594

RUB

Russian rouble

76,3214

THB

Thai baht

38,566

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2158

MXN

Mexican peso

22,2075

INR

Indian rupee

81,1080

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
250.103-3 Contract adjustment. ( a ) Contractor requests should be filed with the procuring contracting officer (PCO). However, if filing with the PCO is impractical, requests may be filed with an authorized representative, an administrative contracting officer, or the Office of General Counsel of the applicable department or agency, for forwarding to the cognizant PCO.
237.102-76 Acquisition of computer software and computer software documentation under services contracts. ( a ) See *227.7202* for policy on the acquisition of commercial computer software and commercial computer software documentation for services contracts that require the development or modification of commercial computer software.
( b ) See 227.7203 for policy on the acquisition of other than commercial computer software and other than commercial computer software documentation for services contracts that require the development or modification of other than commercial computer software.
[88 FR 17344, Mar. 22, 2023]
Exhibit
      32.3








SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CENTRAL
      ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY


(required
      by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002)








In
      connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
      31, 2007 of Central Illinois Public Service Company (the “Registrant”)
      as filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), each undersigned officer of the
      Registrant does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.










Date:
      May
      10, 2007










/s/
      Scott A.
      Cisel


Scott
      A.
      Cisel


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)











/s/
      Warner L.
      Baxter


Warner
      L.
      Baxter


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00382-CV

Levonne Marie Kukuk

v.

Timothy Kukuk

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Parker County (CIV-14-0200)

July 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Levonne Marie Kukuk shall pay all costs 

of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier