Order Form (01/2005), ( ‘( y

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

T
wie | __ Charles R. Norgle. St. | Sian ane ge
CASE NUMBER 12. C4555 | DATE TE SY 2—
¢ id
CASE Maurice Lee (#B-65946) v. Dr. Yu, et al.
TITLE

DOCKET ENTRY TET:

Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [#7] is granted. The Court authorizes and orders Shawnee
Correctional Center officials to deduct $8.03 from Plaintifi end to continue making monthly deductions in
accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the supervisor of inmate trust fund accounts at
Shawnee Correctioral Center. The Clerk és directed to issue summons for Dr. Yu. The Clerk is also directed to send
Plaintiff a magistrate iudge consent form and filing instruc-ions along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's motion for
appointment of counsel [#4] is denied.

Il [For further details see text helow.| Lint fey Docketing to mail notices.

STATEME

sently ‘n state custedy at Shawnee Cor

Center, has brought this pro se civil rights
«dant, Dr. Yu violated his rights by being
rent to a scrious medical condition wnile Plaintitf was a pre-trial detainee at the Cook County

Plaintiff’ x
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff clans that D

deliberately indiff
Jail. More specifically, Plaintiff alleges that when he was taken into Cook County Jail on February 22, 2012, he
gave all of his medical information to medical staff. Included in his medical information was the fact that he had
previously suffered two gunshot wounds and had prescriptions for several medications as a result. Plaintiff]
alleges that Dr. Yu refused to provide him with his prescriptions. treatment, and follow-up care for pain
management.

Pla? ranted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1),

Plaintiffis assessed an initial partial filing fee of 8.07. The trust fund officer at Plaintiffs place of incarceration

s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauper

is authorized and ordered to collect the partiai fi
the Clerk of Court. Aft

monthly payments from Piaintif

ce /rom Plaintiff's trust fund account and pay it directly to
ee. Plaintiff's trust fund officer is directed to collect
1 to 20% of the preceding month’s income
“ded to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the
ent to the Clerk, United States
District Court. 219 8. Dearborn St.. Chicago. Iiinois 60604. aitn: Cashier's Desk, 20th Floor, and shall clearly
identify Plain
be transferred.

(CONTINUED) |

ment of the initial

s trust fund account iy
hail be for

account exceeds $10 until the full $356 filly fee is pe

Camoun. eg

credited to the account. Month'y paymen

AM payments shal!

s name art this case numscr, This Colization will follow Plaintiff wherever he may

: ____|

| AWL

Page | of 2



STATEMERT (coated)
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court is required to conduct a prompt threshold review of the complaint.
zations as true. the Court finds that Plaintiffhas articulated a colorable federal cause
inst Dr. Yu. See Davis v. Carter, 452 F.3d

Here. accepting Plaintiffs alle,

of action for deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition ag:

The Clerk shall issue summons ‘or service of the compiaint on Defendant Yu (hereinafter, “Defendant”).
The Clerk shall also send Plaintitf a Magistrate Judge Consent form and Instructions for Submitting Documents
along with a copy of this order.

The United States Marshals Ser Uefendant. Any service forms necessary for

e Defendant with process. The U.S. Marshal

Plaintiffto complete will be sent by the Marshal as appropriate to
fendant can no longer be found at the work

: aviections or Cermak Health Services shall furnish
The information shall be used only for purposes of effectuating

is directed to make af! res.onatle efforts to serve
the Cook County I
the Marshal with Defencant’s last-known address.

address provided by Plai:

service [or for prooVof service, snould a dispute arise] and any documentation of the address shall be retained only
by the Marshal. Address information shall not be maintei ed in the Court file. nor disclosed by the Marshal. The
Marshal is authotived Lo ma:
P. 4(d)(2) before

Plainti!\
Prisoner Corresp

equest for waiver of service to Defendant in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ.

cial service.

empting pes

struceed te file all facure papers coneerticg this action with the clerk of court in care of the

nr

ainuPiaust provide the ¢ al plus a complete judge’s copy, including

cument filed. In ad

any exhibits. of every zad an exact copy of any Court filing to

Defendant [or to dclense counsel, once an attorney has entered an appearance on behalf of Defendant]. Every

document filed with the Court rust include a cerliMeate of service stating to whom exact copies were mailed and

the date of mailing. Any p

that ts sent ty to the j-dge or that otherwise fails to comply with these

instructions may > jain’.

sted by the Court of returned to ?
notion for appoinimeni of counsel | #4]. The motion is denied. Plaintiff has no
15 3d 847.851 (7th Cir. 2010); Johnson vy, Doughty,
‘ot involve complex discovery or an

: See Rometelii v.
Cir 2006), The ca:

ants

433 F.3d 1001.
evidentiary hea.i

the presence of mind and intellectual
. Accordingly, his motion for the
F.3d 647, 656-59. (7th Cir. 2007). The
yceed to a point that assistance of counsel

s current pleadings iaticate that yeh

2 of the proceedi:

capability to coatnuc representing himself at this

appointmeat of cotisel is dencd wither

Court denies his inotion witht prejudi
is appropriate.

Page 2 of 2