alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leonard J. Fambo, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Appellant specifically waived assignment of counsel upon this appeal. (Appeal from order of Erie County Court denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for possession of burglars’ instruments rendered April 24, 1962.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecehio, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          253201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1678564
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     642787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3098433
<PP&E>                                         1446190
<DEPRECIATION>                                  966082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4837225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1573208
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       5714570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (2507038)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4837225
<SALES>                                        6236962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6240205
<CGS>                                          3181586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5738409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               36409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 465387
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (502410)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             967797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    967797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
On January 8, 2002,  President George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Part of  No Child Left Behind is the Boy Scouts of  America Equal Access Act, Section 9525 of the Elementary and  Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by Section 901 of the No Child Left  Behind Act of 2001 (the Boy Scouts Act), which applies to public elementary and  secondary schools, local educational agencies (LEAs), and State educational  agencies (SEAs) that receive Federal funds made available through the  Department of Education. Under the Boy Scouts Act, which became effective on  January 8, 2002, no such public school, LEA or SEA that provides an opportunity  for one or more outside youth or community groups to meet on school premises or  in school facilities shall deny equal access or a fair opportunity to meet to,  or discriminate against, any group officially affiliated with the Boy Scouts of  America, or any other youth group listed in Title 36 of  the United States Code as a patriotic society, that wishes to meet at the  school.    OCR is charged with  enforcing the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act. Complaints alleging  violations of this law may be filed using the OCR online complaint  form or by contacting the OCR office with authority to handle complaints where the institution or entity you are  complaining about is located.    Links to Boy Scouts of  America Equal Access Act and its implementing regulations:
              - 20 USC 7905 Equal access to public school facilities  (USCode.house.gov)
              - Sec. 9525 of the Elementary  and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
              - Equal Access to Public School  Facilities for the Boy Scouts of America and Other Designated Youth Groups 
              - Final Rule
- Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
- Advance Notice  of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)
# C_2017320EN.01000501.xml

| 27.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 320/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Luxembourg

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 200th anniversary of the Grand Duke Guillaume III

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows on the left hand the effigy of His Royal Highness, the Grand-Duke Henri, looking to the left and on the right hand the effigy of HRH the Grand-Duke Guillaume III. At the top of the design is depicted the year-date ‘2017’. At the bottom appears the text ‘GRANDS-DUCS DE LUXEMBOURG’. The name ‘GUILLAUME III’ followed by the indication of the year of birth ‘*1817’ is depicted above the respective effigy.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : October/November 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
<PAGE> 70
                                                                EXHIBIT 12.5

                WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
             RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
       FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
                  (Thousands Except Ratio)
                        (Unaudited)

Operating Income                                                 $58,829

Adjustments:
  Federal income taxes                                             3,602
  Provision for deferred Federal income taxes                      4,344
  Deferred investment tax credits                                 (1,321)
  Other income and deductions                                      2,834
  Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
    used during construction                                         973

        Earnings                                                 $69,261


Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term  debt                                    $20,110
  Interest on short-term debt and other                            3,989

        Fixed Charges                                            $24,099


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                  2.87
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 10.58

                                                       PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL


                                   May 3, 2000



Mr. James C. Mullen
138 Richardson Drive
Needham, MA 02492

Dear Jim:

As a follow-up to our conversation last Friday, I am pleased to confirm that the
Board of Directors has approved your appointment as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Biogen, Inc., effective June 16, 2000.

Concurrent with the effective date of your appointment, the Board of Directors
has also approved an adjustment in your annual base salary to $700,000, and has
established a target of 90% of your base salary for your cash bonus in 2000. In
addition, you will be granted an option to purchase 250,000 shares of Biogen
Common Stock, effective June 16, 2000, with a seven-year, straight-line vesting
schedule.

Jim, on behalf of the other members of the Board, I wish you the best of success
as you take over the leadership of Biogen next month.

In the interim, please let me know how I can assist you in the transition to
your new role.

                                            Sincerely,


                                            /s/ James L. Vincent
                                            James L. Vincent
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
JLV:bk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                Certification of
                             Chief Executive Officer
                         of Wyndham International, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the
"Form 10-K") for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Wyndham International, Inc.
(the "Issuer").

I, Fred J. Kleisner, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (i)  the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Issuer.

Dated:  March 25, 2003.

                                                       /s/    Fred J. Kleisner
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       Name:  Fred J. Kleisner

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 12 day of March 25 2003.

/s/  Camaleta M. Roseman
------------------------------------
Name: Camaleta M. Roseman
     --------------------
Title: Notary Public

My commission expires: 05-24-04
#### 31.701 Purpose.

This subpart provides the principles for determining the cost applicable to work performed by nonprofit organizations under contracts with the Government. A nonprofit organization, for purpose of identification, is defined as a business entity organized and operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, or educational purposes, of which no part of the net earnings inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, of which no substantial part of the activities is carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation or participating in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office, and which are exempt from federal income taxation under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code.
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **WRITTEN    STATEMENT****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF    THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the    VICE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE    FINANCE CORPORATION (the “Company”), pursuant to    18 U.S.C. § 1350, hereby certifies that to the    best of their knowledge:      (i)        the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended    December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies    with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and      (ii)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     Dated: March 9, 2007/s/  Steven    F. Udvar-Hazy    Steven F. Udvar-Hazy     Dated: March 9, 2007/s/  Alan    H. Lund    Alan H. Lund
#### Stephen Kasprzicki, by Paul Kasprzicki, appellee, v. G. Revere, trading as R. & S. Teaming Company, and Acme Grocery Company, defendants. Acme Grocery Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,761.

Action for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Harry B. Miller, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

Church, Haft & Robertson and Harry H. Krinsky, for appellant.

Charles C. Spencer, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 223.7101 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the terms *storage* and *toxic or hazardous materials* are defined in the clause at 252.223-7006, Prohibition on Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or Hazardous Materials.
## Key Staff

**Wendy Lawrence, M.Ed.**Competition Program ManagerCenter of Educational Excellence for Black Teachers at HBCUs (CEEBT) ProgramPhone:	202-453-7821Email: Wendy.Lawrence@ed.gov

**Mailing Address:**Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary EducationU.S. Department of Education, OPECenter of Educational Excellence for Black Teachers at HBCUs (CEEBT) Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Mail Stop LBJ-2B162Washington, DC 20202**E-mail:**CEEBT@ed.gov

FIPSE Home
2803.906 Remedies. ( a ) Upon determination that a contractor has subjected one of its employees to a reprisal for providing information as set forth in FAR 3.906(a), the HCA or designee may take one or more actions specified in that section.
( b ) Whenever a contractor fails to comply with an order issued pursuant to FAR 3.906(a), the HCA or designee shall notify the Attorney General and request that DOJ file an action for enforcement of such order in the United States District Court.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts
AcknowledgmentsTitle             PageList of             FiguresConversion             FactorsAbstractIntroductionSettingMethodsBathymetrySidescan             Sonar Seismic             Profiles SedimentsBottom             Photography Data             CatalogSummaryAcknowledgmentsReferences             Cited Contacts
We thank the officers and crew of the NOAA Ship Thomas       Jefferson. This report benefited from critical reviews by Matt       Arsenault, Elizabeth Pendleton, and VeeAnn Cross (all of the USGS). The       title-page graphic was derived from figures 19, 20, 26, and a bottom photograph from station E17.   

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/ack.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:31:49 EDT
loans issues
general provisions
ACG/National SMART Grants

The U.S. Department of Education established four negotiating committees to address: (1) Title IV loan issues;  (2) issues related to the Academic Competitiveness Grant (ACG) and National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent Grant (National SMART Grant) programs; (3) General Provisions; and (4) Accreditation.  Information regarding these commitees may be found at the pages linked below.   We will post additional information on this site as it becomes available.

- **Loans Team**
- **ACG/SMART Team**
- **General Provisions Team**
- **Accreditation Team**

Public Hearings for Negotiated Rulemaking for Programs Authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act: The Department held a series of four regional hearings beginning September 19, 2006 to solicit issues that should be considered for action by the negotiating committees.

OPE Policy Initiatives | OPE Home
219.1307 Price evaluation preference for HUBZone small business concerns. ( a ) Also, do not use the price evaluation preference in acquisitions that use tiered evaluation of offers, until a tier is reached that considers offers from other than small business concerns.
[71 FR 53043, Sept. 8, 2006]
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Retrospective Review Plan Report**

**July 8, 2013**

**U.S. Department of Education**

**Retrospective Review Plan Report**

**July 8, 2013**

The U.S. Department of Education (ED or the Department) submits this report in response to the President’s Executive Order 13610, “Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens,” (EO) directing agencies to report to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) on the status of their retrospective review efforts.  The EO directs agencies to invite comments from the public on a regular basis about regulations in need of retrospective review, including appropriate modifications to regulations.  The EO also directs agencies, in implementing and revising their retrospective review plans, to give priority to those initiatives that will produce significant quantifiable monetary savings or significant quantifiable reductions in paperwork burden while protecting public health, welfare, safety, and the environment and to give special consideration to those initiatives that would reduce unjustified regulatory burden on small businesses.  In accordance with the EO, the Department is also including in this report (Items 12-13) a description of two initiatives (previously reported in the Department’s September 10, 2012, report) that are anticipated to produce significant quantifiable reductions in paperwork and reporting burdens. 

**Retrospective Review**

**Paperwork and Reporting Burden Initiatives**

1

10
February 27, 2008

Dear President:

Recent volatility in credit markets has raised concerns about the continued availability 
of student loans. I want you to know that the United States Department of Education, 
in conjunction with other federal agencies, is closely monitoring the situation 
and continues to assess how broader market conditions may impact the student loan 
market.

I want to reassure you that federal financial aid - grants, loans through 
  both the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) and Direct Loan Programs, and 
  work-study - will continue to be available to your students and their 
  families. There are more than 2,000 lenders that originate loans in the FFEL 
  Program. While a few lenders have chosen or may choose to reevaluate their continued 
  participation in this program, we expect other lenders will actively compete 
  for this loan volume and ensure that a competitive, efficient, and comprehensive 
  FFEL Program continues to provide a variety of lending options, foster innovation, 
  and improve customer service.

Thus far, we have not encountered any situation in which eligible students 
  have been unable to obtain federal student loans. To assist the Department with 
  its monitoring of the situation, I have asked my staff to contact your financial 
  aid administrator in the coming days and inquire about any lenders that plan 
  to reduce, suspend, or discontinue making student loans to students at your 
  institution.

It's our goal to ensure that all students and parents have continued 
  access to federal student aid. We appreciate your assistance in our efforts 
  to monitor the current student loan situation as it impacts your institution.

| | Sincerely,        
| | ------------------
| | /s/               
| | Margaret Spellings



|Last Modified: 03/03/2008
|-------------------------
#### 252.211-7008 Use of Government-assigned Serial Numbers.

As prescribed in 211.274-5(b), use the following clause:

# Use of Government-assigned Serial Numbers (SEP 2010)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Government-assigned serial number* means a combination of letters or numerals in a fixed human-readable information format (text) conveying information about a major end item, which is provided to a contractor by the requiring activity with accompanying technical data instructions for marking the Government-assigned serial number on major end items to be delivered to the Government.

*Major end item* means a final combination of component parts and/or materials which is ready for its intended use and of such importance to operational readiness that review and control of inventory management functions (procurement, distribution, maintenance, disposal, and asset reporting) is required at all levels of life cycle management. Major end items include aircraft; ships; boats; motorized wheeled, tracked, and towed vehicles for use on highway or rough terrain; weapon and missile end items; ammunition; and sets, assemblies, or end items having a major end item as a component.

*Unique item identifier (UII)* means a set of data elements permanently marked on an item that is globally unique and unambiguous and never changes in order to provide traceability of the item throughout its total life cycle. The term includes a concatenated UII or a DoD-recognized unique identification equivalent.

(b) The Contractor shall mark the Government-assigned serial numbers on those major end items as specified by line item in the Schedule, in accordance with the technical instructions for the placement and method of application identified in the terms and conditions of the contract.

(c) The Contractor shall register the Government-assigned serial number along with the major end item's UII at the time of delivery in accordance with the provisions of the clause at DFARS 252.211-7003(d).

(d) The Contractor shall establish the UII for major end items for use throughout the life of the major end item. The Contractor may elect, but is not required, to use the Government-assigned serial number to construct the UII.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 59103, Sept. 27, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 88537, Dec. 22, 2023]
#### Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v Yeshiva University, Respondent-Appellant.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 6, 1978, modified, on the law, to strike therefrom the first and second decretal paragraphs thereof, substituting therefor a decretal paragraph granting the motion for summary judgment of plaintiff-appellant-respondent and denying the cross motion of defendant-respondent-appellant and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Suit was for late charges on unpaid gas and electric bills. Special Term granted summary judgment for the second category only. The charge imposed for late payments is neither a penalty nor a service charge, is neither unreasonable nor other than compensatory, nor is it excessive as to the practice of compounding by adding outstanding interest for each period to the prior debt. In any event, its reasonableness is for the Public Service Commission to decide. *(Cardone v Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y.,*197 Mise 188, 191, affd 276 App Div 1068.) The distinction made by Special Term between late charges imposed on indebtedness for gas and those for electricity, based on subdivision 6 of section 65 of the Public Service Law, is without validity, and summary judgment should have been granted for the former as well as the latter. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Lane, Markewich, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.