alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 374 

Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 2018, as ‘‘Darwin 

Day’’ and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 

humanity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 18, 2018 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. MURPHY, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 

2018, as ‘‘Darwin Day’’ and recognizing the importance 

of science in the betterment of humanity. 

Whereas Charles Darwin developed the theory of evolution by 

the mechanism of natural selection, which, together with 

the monumental amount of scientific evidence Charles 

Darwin compiled to support the theory, provides humanity with a logical and intellectually compelling explanation 

for the diversity of life on Earth; 

Whereas the validity of the theory of evolution by natural selection developed by Charles Darwin is further strongly 

supported by the modern understanding of the science of 

genetics; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 374 IS 

Whereas it has been the human curiosity and ingenuity exemplified by Charles Darwin that has promoted new scientific discoveries that have helped humanity solve many 

problems and improve living conditions; 

Whereas the advancement of science must be protected from 

those unconcerned with the adverse impacts of global 

warming and climate change; 

Whereas the teaching of creationism in some public schools 

compromises the scientific and academic integrity of the 

education systems of the United States; 

Whereas Charles Darwin is a worthy symbol of scientific advancement on which to focus and around which to build 

a global celebration of science and humanity intended to 

promote a common bond among all the people of the 

Earth; and 

Whereas February 12, 2018, is the anniversary of the birth 

of Charles Darwin in 1809 and would be an appropriate 

date to designate as ‘‘Darwin Day’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Darwin Day’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) recognizes Charles Darwin as a worthy sym5 bol on which to celebrate the achievements of reason, 

6 science, and the advancement of human knowledge. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
    EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C.
    20549
  Form 10-Q/A
 (Amendment
    No. 1)
  þ

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the quarterly period ended
    March 31, 2006.ORo

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period
    from          
    to          .   Commission File Number: 0-7261
  CHAPARRAL RESOURCES,
    INC.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as
    Specified in Its Charter)
  Delaware

84-0630863(State or Other Jurisdiction
    of
    Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
    Identification No.)   2 Gannett Drive, Suite 418
 White Plains, New York 10604
 (Address of Principal Executive
    Offices)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code:
    (866) 559-3822
   þ o
  Rule 12b-2
 o o þ
  Rule 12b-2 o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Explanatory NoteItem 6  ExhibitsSignaturesCEO CertificationCFO Certification    Table of Contents  
  Explanatory
    Note
  Form 10-Q 10-Q), Financial Statements Exhibits 10-Q Regulation M-A, 10-Q 10-Q. 10-Q 10-Q.




---



##### Table of Contents



9.
    Related
    Party Transactions  mark-up
        2006


2005$000


$000Nelson






326Caspian


257



     
    
    Nelson was merged into Caspian on December 5, 2005.    2006


2005$000


$000Nelson






237Caspian


244



244



237     
    
    Nelson was merged into Caspian on December 5, 2005.   1




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 6  Exhibits
  *31.1




CEO Certification Pursuant to
    Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation M-A, as adopted pursuant to
    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*31.2




CFO Certification Pursuant to
    Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation M-A, as adopted pursuant to
    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.     *
    
    Filed herewith. 2




---



##### Table of Contents



Signatures
        By:
    /s/  Boris
    Zilbermints     By:
    /s/  Charles
    Talbot     3




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX TO
    EXHIBITS
  *31.1




CEO Certification Pursuant to
    Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation M-A, as adopted pursuant to
    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*31.2




CFO Certification Pursuant to
    Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation M-A, as adopted pursuant to
    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.     *
    
    Filed herewith. 4
Exhibit 21.1





Subsidiaries of US Airways Group, Inc.

Airways Assurance Limited LLC
        Incorporated under the laws of Bermuda.

Allegheny Airlines, Inc. (operates under the trade name "US Airways Express")
        Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.

Material Services Company, Inc.
        Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.

Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (operates under the trade name "US Airways Express")
        Incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland.

Potomac Air, Inc. (operates under the trade name "US Airways Express")
        Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.

PSA Airlines, Inc. (operates under the trade name "US Airways Express")
        Incorporated under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania.

US Airways, Inc. 
        Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.

US Airways Leasing and Sales, Inc.
        Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.

USLM Corporation
        Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 533 

Commemorating the commissioning of the USS Manchester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2018 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. JONES, and Mr. WICKER) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the commissioning of the USS Manchester. 

Whereas the State of New Hampshire has a long and distinguished history of military service dating back to 1680, 

when militia companies were formed in the State to protect the citizens of New Hampshire; 

Whereas New Hampshire sent 3 regiments of minutemen to 

Boston in the wake of the skirmishes at Lexington and 

Concord, and many of those minutemen went on to fight 

gallantly under the command of then Colonel, and future 

Major General, John Stark at the Battle of Bunker Hill 

on June 17, 1775; 

Whereas Portsmouth shipbuilder John Langdon, who would 

later become a United States Senator, oversaw the construction of some of the first vessels of the United States 

Navy, including the sloop-of-war the USS Ranger, which 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 533 ATS 

was built and equipped for naval hero Captain John Paul 

Jones; 

Whereas the city of Manchester, New Hampshire (commonly 

known as the ‘‘Queen City’’), is— 

(1) the largest city in northern New England; 

(2) an engine for the economy of New Hampshire; 

and 

(3) the namesake of the first industrialized city in 

the world, Manchester, England; 

Whereas the first vessel of the United States Navy to be 

named for the city of Manchester, New Hampshire, was 

the USS Manchester (CL–83), which— 

(1) was a Cleveland class light cruiser commissioned 

on October 29, 1946; 

(2) served with distinction in 3 combat tours during 

the Korean War; and 

(3) received 9 battle stars for her service; 

Whereas, on April 16, 2013, Secretary of the Navy Raymond 

Edwin Mabus, Jr., announced that an Independence class 

Littoral Combat Ship (commonly known as an ‘‘LCS’’) 

would be named the ‘‘USS Manchester’’ (referred to in 

this preamble as the ‘‘USS Manchester (LCS–14)’’); 

Whereas, on June 29, 2015, there was a keel-laying ceremony 

for the USS Manchester (LCS–14) in Mobile, Alabama; 

Whereas, on May 7, 2016, the USS Manchester (LCS–14) 

was christened in Mobile, Alabama, and sponsored by 

United States Senator Jeanne Shaheen; 

Whereas, on May 12, 2016, the United States Navy launched 

the USS Manchester (LCS–14); and 

Whereas the USS Manchester (LCS–14)— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 533 ATS 

(1) will join the USS New Hampshire (SSN–778) 

fast attack submarine in the United States Navy fleet; 

and 

(2) will be commissioned in Portsmouth, New 

Hampshire, on May 26, 2018: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate commemorates the com2 missioning of the United States Ship Manchester (LCS– 

3 14), the mission of which will be to act as a networked, 

4 agile, stealthy surface combatant capable of defeating 

5 anti-access and asymmetric threats in the littorals. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
22.305 Contract clause. Insert the clause at 52.222-4, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards—Overtime Compensation, in solicitations and contracts (including, for this purpose, basic ordering agreements) when the contract may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics. However, do not include the clause in solicitations and contracts— ( a ) Valued at or below $150,000;
( b ) For commercial products and commercial services;
( c ) For transportation or the transmission of intelligence;
( d ) To be performed outside the United States, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Johnston Island, Wake Island, and the outer Continental Shelf as defined in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331) (29 CFR 5.15);
( e ) For work to be done solely in accordance with 41 U.S.C. chapter 65(see subpart 22.6);
( f ) For supplies that include incidental services that do not require substantial employment of laborers or mechanics; or
( g ) Exempt under regulations of the Secretary of Labor (29 CFR 5.15).
[68 FR 28082, May 22, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 57367, Sept. 28, 2006, 75 FR 53133, Aug. 30, 2010; 79 FR 24203, Apr. 29, 2014; 85 FR 27091, May 6, 2020; 86 FR 61028, Nov. 4, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - 17 CFR Part 210
          - [Release No. 33-10876A; 34-90210A; FR-88A; IA-5613A; IC-34052A; File No. S7-26-19]
          - RIN 3235-AM63

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document makes technical corrections to amendments to update certain auditor independence requirements adopted in Release No. 33-10876 (October 16, 2020) (“Adopting Release”), which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 11, 2020.                    

# DATES:

Effective June 9, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Kim, Senior Special Counsel, Office of the Chief Accountant, at (202) 551-5300, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

We are making technical amendments to correct § 210.2-01. Specifically, this document amends Instruction 2 published in the Adopting Release. Instruction 2.c is amended to correct a citation to § 210.2-01.

                    In document FR doc. 2020-23364, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Friday, December 11, 2020, at 85 FR 80508, the following correction is made:                

§ 210.2-01

1. On page 80541, in the first column, under “§ 210.2-01” in Instruction 2.c, “Revising paragraphs (c)(1)(ii)(A) introductory text” is corrected to read “Revising paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A)( *1*) introductory text.”                    

Dated: February 4, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-02615 Filed 2-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Global Material Technologies, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01851

Honorable Manish S. Shah

Dahzeng Metal Fibre CO, LTD, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, September 23, 2015:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiff's motion for order

to Remove the "Attorneys' Eyes Only" Designations on Certain Documents Produced by

Tru Group [238] is granted. Plaintiff's motion to Remove the "Attorneys' Eyes Only"

Designations on Certain Documents Produced by Third−Party Federal−Mogul Holdings

Corporation [246] is granted in part and denied in part. Enter Memorandum Opinion and

Order. Mailed notice (ma,)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01851 Document #: 270 Filed: 09/23/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:6227
206.001-70 Exception for prototype projects for follow-on production contracts. ( a ) Also excepted from this part are follow-on production contracts for products developed pursuant to the “other transactions” authority of 10 U.S.C. 4022 for prototype projects, when the contracting officer receives sufficient documentation from the agreements officer issuing the other transaction agreement for the prototype project that— ( 1 ) The other transaction agreement included provisions for a follow-on production contract (10 U.S.C. 4022(f)(1)); and
( 2 ) Where applicable, the threshold at 10 U.S.C. 4022(a)(2)(C) and the requirements at 10 U.S.C. 4022(f)(2)(A) and (B) have been met.
( b ) See PGI 206.001-70 for additional guidance.
[88 FR 33835, May 25, 2023]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FLORENCIO ESQUIVEL-LARA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72633

Agency No. A090-067-700

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 9, 2014

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and PRATT, Senior

District Judge.

** 

Petitioner, Florencio Esquivel-Lara, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that he was

FILED

APR 17 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, Senior United States District Judge

for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
not eligible for adjustment of status. To qualify, he had to have been “admitted”

within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a). 

Petitioner had previously adjusted his status to that of a temporary resident,

but failed to apply for permanent resident status within forty-three months as

required by 8 U.S.C. § 1255a(b)(2)(C). The parties now agree that this case is

controlled by our court’s recent decision in United States v. Hernandez-Arias, __

F.3d __, 12-50193, 2014 WL 1099414 (9th Cir. March 21, 2014), where we held

that such failure to apply for adjustment to permanent residence results in reversion

to the prior “unadmitted” status.

Accordingly, the petition must be DENIED. 

2
# C_2018210EN.01000301.xml

| 18.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 June 2018

(2018/C 210/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1596 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4503 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87320 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1713 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1575 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 124,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,714 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,04 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2807 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6628 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,4671 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5518 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5223 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1020 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6676 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5619 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 272,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5659 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4463 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3801 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 221,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6382 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,881 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,5401 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,606 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3761 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,0902 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,8705 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1596

JPY

Japanese yen

128,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4503

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87320

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1713

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1575

ISK

Iceland króna

124,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,714

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,04

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2807

RON

Romanian leu

4,6628

TRY

Turkish lira

5,4671

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5518

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5223

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1020

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6676

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5619

KRW

South Korean won

1 272,93

ZAR

South African rand

15,5659

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4463

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3801

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 221,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6382

PHP

Philippine peso

61,881

RUB

Russian rouble

72,5401

THB

Thai baht

37,606

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3761

MXN

Mexican peso

24,0902

INR

Indian rupee

78,8705

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### In the Matter of Joseph J. Steger, Respondent, v. Francis W. Farrell, as Director of New York State Civil Defense Commission, et al., Appellants.

Aulisi, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Albany County, which under article 78 (CPLR), directed that the appellants retain the petitioner, an exempt volunteer fireman under section 75 of the Civil Service Law, in the position of Civil Defense Safety Representative with the status of a permanent employee and which restrained them from interfering with his continued employment in that position *(Matter of Steger*v. *Farrell,*35 Misc 2d 614). Petitioner was appointed without a competitive examination to the classified position of Field Representative (Rescue) in the former Division of Safety, in the Executive Department of the State of New York. He was summarily removed on March 31, 1959. He instituted proceedings under article 78 to review his removal and on October 1, 1959, the Supreme Court, Albany County, ordered his reinstatement with back pay on the grounds that his position was permanent and by the provisions of section 75 of the Civil Service Law he could be removed only for cause and after a hearing (decision not reported). Appeal to this court was withdrawn on March 16, 1961, and petitioner was reinstated in November of 1961 with back pay. His position by that time was transferred to the Civil Defense Commission and renamed as Civil Defense Safety Representative. In April of 1961, the Legislature by chapter 299 provided that at the election of the Civil Service Commission the positions known as temporary emergency defense positions could be made subject to the civil service requirements for competitive permanent positions. The Civil Service Commission elected as of May 17, 1961, to make those positions competitive and permanent and thereby subject present holders *730to a qualifying examination. Petitioner, after being reinstated in November of 1961, was immediately informed of the examination requirements and was permitted to take the examination in February, 1962, under protest. Petitioner failed the examination and, after being notified that his employment was terminated, instituted these article 78 proceedings. Whether this position was temporary or, as the Special Term found, permanent, it is clear that chapter 299 of the Laws of 1961 abrogates any rights which petitioner might have had under section 75 of the Civil Service Law. That law was specifically intended to make these positions subject to the usual rules for permanent employment. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.