alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3025.7002-3 Specific application of trade agreements. ( a ) For covered items entitled to non-discriminatory treatment under the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement (WTO GPA), or any Free Trade Agreement (FTA) listed in (FAR) 48 CFR subpart 25.4, this subpart is applied as follows— ( 1 ) For solicitations, orders, exercising of an option and contracts issued by any component other than Transportation Security Administration (TSA), in which any covered items will be procured with a value that is both above the simplified acquisition threshold, and below the applicable trade agreement threshold in (FAR) 48 CFR 25.402, apply (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-1. Section 3025.7002-2(h) will exclude eligible products of designated countries with FTA thresholds beneath the simplified acquisition threshold from coverage of section 604.
( 2 ) For solicitations, orders, exercising of an option and contracts issued by any component other than Transportation Security Administration (TSA), in which any covered items will be procured with a value exceeding $194,000 (or the superseding threshold upon updating of (FAR) 48 CFR 25.402), (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002-1 does not apply if the items are eligible products per FAR 48 CFR subpart 25.4; follow (FAR) 48 CFR part 25 instead.
( 3 ) For solicitations, orders, exercising of an option and contracts issued by TSA in which any covered items will be procured with a value exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002 applies to all covered items except those from Mexico, Canada or Chile because TSA is listed as a covered governmental entity in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement but TSA is excluded from all other trade agreements.
( b ) For covered items from a country that is not entitled to non-discriminatory treatment under the WTO GPA, or any FTA listed in (FAR) 48 CFR subpart 25.4, apply the restrictions of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3025.7002 to all solicitations, orders, exercising of an option and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold in place of the Buy America Act policies at (FAR) 48 CFR subpart 25.1.
#### 2911.002 Policy.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Case No. l:12-cv-04522

VERONICA LYNCH, individually and on behalf

of all others similarly situated and on behalf of

the Hospira 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan,

Plaintiff,

-againstHOSPIRA, INC., THE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT BOARD

OF REVIEW OF HOSPIRA, fNC, PAMELA HANNON,

HENRY A. WEISHAAR, LORI O. CARLSON,

RICHARD J. HOFFMAN, THE COMPENSATION

COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

HOSPIRA, INC., ROGER W. HALE, CONNIE R.

CURRAN, JACQUE J. SOKOLOV, and

HEINO VON PRONDZYNSKI,

Defendants.

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiff, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby

files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l) dismissing her

complaint with prejudice. The parties have agreed that each side shall bear its own costs and

expenses.

Case: 1:12-cv-04522 Document #: 16 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:501
Dated: October 2, 2012 Respectfully submitted

Plaintiff

s/Manm ^. iUiffer

Marvin A. Miller

MILLER LAW LLC

115 S. LaSalleSt., Suite 2910

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Telephone: (312)332-3400

Robert I. Harvvood

HARWOOD FEFFER LLP

488 Madison Avenue

New York, New York 10022

Telephone:(212) 935-7400

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case: 1:12-cv-04522 Document #: 16 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:502
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MEANS

I, Marvin A. Miller, one of the attorneys for plaintiffs, hereby eertify that on Oetober

2, 2012, service of Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was aceomplished pursuant to ECF as to

Filing Users and I shall comply with LR 5.5 as to any party who is not a Filing User or

represented by a Filing User.

A/ Marvin A. Miller

Case: 1:12-cv-04522 Document #: 16 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:503
# Stengthening Historically Black Graduate Institutions Program

# FY 2014 Non-Competing Continuation Grantees

10/12/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MICHELE F. O'BRYAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 12 C 5305

)

POSTRACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., )

DONALD HEIDRICH, MARK AUBRY, )

WILLIAM WASHBURN, and STEVEN )

GONZALO, )

)

Defendants. )

______________________________________ )

)

POSTRACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., )

)

Counter-Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHELE F. O'BRYAN and )

DOUGLAS SPITZ, )

)

Counter and )

Third-Party Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Court has received five separate answers, filed by defendants PosTrack

Technologies, Inc. ("PosTrack"), Donald Heidrich, Mark Aubry, William Washburn and Steven 1

Gonzalo, to the Complaint filed against them by Michele O'Bryan. That delivery to this Court

 That current filing is PosTrack's Second Amended Answer -- its first Amended Answer 1

had been triggered by this Court's September 21, 2012 memorandum opinion and order that was

"issued sua sponte because that responsive pleading gets a failing grade in Federal Pleading 101

in a number of respects."

Case: 1:12-cv-05305 Document #: 35 Filed: 11/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:237
complied with the requirement of this District Court's LR 5.2(f) as to electronically filed

documents -- a requirement colloquially referred to as the delivery of a "courtesy copy." 

Regrettably, although perhaps lawyers cannot be expected to look at matters from the

perspective of the judges to whom their cases are assigned, the current filings do not accord this

Court the full "courtesy" that it hopes to be provided in the litigation process. Some added

thought would bring counsel to realize that this Court reads all of the filings in cases assigned to

its calendar, and having to wade through 91 pages of pleadings (31 in the PosTrack filing and 15

in each of the four individual Answers) imposes a needless extra burden on this Court. Indeed,

because one of the important functions of notice pleading is to identify just which aspects of each

defendant's factual and legal position are on the same page and which are not, such separate

filings by the same law firm are a disservice rather than a service.

That being said, this Court has not undertaken the chore of parsing all of the current

pleadings. Instead it strikes them as needlessly prolix, with leave granted of course to file a

single responsive pleading on behalf of all defendants on or before December 7, 2012. If

however defense counsel's best judgment is that the case is better presented by a stand-alone

response by PosTrack coupled with a combined response on the part of the four individual

defendants, the PosTrack pleading will not be stricken and counsel may proceed as to the four

individuals.

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: November 20, 2012

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-05305 Document #: 35 Filed: 11/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:238
#### 2452.216-77 Estimated quantities—requirements contract.

As prescribed in 2416.506-70(c), insert the following provision:

# Estimated Quantities—Requirements Contract (FEB 2006)

In accordance with FAR 52.216-21(a), the government provides the following estimates:

The estimated quantity or amount of supplies or services the government may order during the ordering period of this contract is ______________________ [*insert description of item(s) or unit(s) and the estimated number of units or the dollar value*].

The maximum quantity or amount of supplies or services the government may order during the ordering period of this contract is ______________________ [*insert description of item(s) or unit(s) and the estimated number of units or the dollar value*].

(End of provision)

[71 FR 2439, Jan. 13, 2006]
# C_2018144EN.01000101.xml

| 25.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 April 2018

(2018/C 144/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2213 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4478 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87468 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3775 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1944 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,25 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,437 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,83 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1996 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6530 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,9985 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6038 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5662 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5829 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7134 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6154 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 314,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0663 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7012 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4194 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 941,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7698 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,747 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,2566 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,410 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2085 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9992 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,0765 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2213

JPY

Japanese yen

132,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4478

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87468

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3775

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1944

ISK

Iceland króna

123,25

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,437

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,83

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1996

RON

Romanian leu

4,6530

TRY

Turkish lira

4,9985

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6038

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5662

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5829

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7134

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6154

KRW

South Korean won

1 314,66

ZAR

South African rand

15,0663

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7012

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4194

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 941,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7698

PHP

Philippine peso

63,747

RUB

Russian rouble

75,2566

THB

Thai baht

38,410

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2085

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9992

INR

Indian rupee

81,0765

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
27.102 General guidance. ( a ) The Government encourages the maximum practical commercial use of inventions made under Government contracts.
( b ) Generally, the Government will not refuse to award a contract on the grounds that the prospective contractor may infringe a patent. The Government may authorize and consent to the use of inventions in the performance of certain contracts, even though the inventions may be covered by U.S. patents.
( c ) Generally, contractors providing commercial products and commercial services should indemnify the Government against liability for the infringement of U.S. patents.
( d ) The Government recognizes rights in data developed at private expense, and limits its demands for delivery of that data. When such data is delivered, the Government will acquire only those rights essential to its needs.
( e ) Generally, the Government requires that contractors obtain permission from copyright owners before including copyrighted works, owned by others, in data to be delivered to the Government.
[72 FR 63049, Nov. 7, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 61028, Nov. 4, 2021]
#### 31.205-8 Contributions or donations.

Contributions or donations, including cash, property and services, regardless of recipient, are unallowable, except as provided in 31.205-1(e)(3).

[51 FR 12300, Apr. 9, 1986]
| **You are here:**OESE Home > Programs/Initiatives > Impact Aid |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |  | Subscribe Now/public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USED/subscriber/new?topic_id=USED_67> Section 8002 Listserv/public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USED/subscriber/new?topic_id=USED_66> Section 8003 Listserv
The mission of the Impact Aid Program is to disburse Impact Aid payments to local educational agencies that are financially burdened by federal activities and to provide technical assistance and support services to staff and other interested parties.
- About Impact Aid
- Impact Aid Program Staff
- Impact Aid Program Specialists State Assignments
- Meet our Director  Programs and Grants  Related Links  State Educational Agency Representative List  WebEx Recaps   Contact us  Office of Impact Aid ProgramsU.S. Department of Education400 Maryland Ave., SW  Washington, DC 20202-6244Phone: 202-260-3858Fax: 866-799-1273 Web address:  http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oese/impactaid/index.htmlE-Mail address: ImpactAid@ed.gov Director: Marilyn Hall, Marilyn.Hall@ed.gov            Last Modified: 06/02/2020 |
Docket ID: FAA-2015-3632 Dir No: 2015-NM-023-AD

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 2/23/15

Regional Airline Association 2/23/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 2/23/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 2/23/15
3001.301-70 Amendment of HSAR. ( a ) Requests for changes to the regulation may be recommended by DHS personnel, other Government agencies, or the public. Change requests are to be submitted in the following format to the Department of Homeland Security, Attn: Office of the Under Secretary of Management, Chief Procurement Officer, Washington, DC 20528. ( 1 ) *Problem:* Succinctly state the problem(s) created by current HSAR requirements or processes and describe the factual or legal reasons for requesting a regulatory change.
( 2 ) *Recommendation:* Identify the recommended change by using the current language and lining through the words to be deleted and inserting proposed language in brackets. If the change is extensive, deleted language may be displayed by forming a box with diagonal lines connecting the corners.
( 3 ) *Discussion:* Explain why the change is necessary and how the change will solve the problem. Address any cost or administrative impact on Government activities, offerors, and contractors. Provide any other helpful information and documents such as statutes, legal decisions, regulations, reports, etc.
( 4 ) *Point of Contact:* Provide a point of contact for answering questions regarding the recommendation, along with a telephone number, e-mail or other method of reaching the contact.
( b ) The HSAR is maintained by the CPO through the HSAR/HSAM change process (i.e., input from various Components including representatives specifically designated to formulate Departmental acquisition policies and procedures). ( 1 ) Homeland Security Acquisition Circular (HSAC). HSAC (see (HSAR) 48 Chapter 3001.301-72) will be used to amend (HSAR) 48 Chapter 30.
( 2 ) HSAR Notices will be issued (with a specified expiration date) when interim guidance is necessary under any of the following circumstances: ( i ) To promulgate, as rapidly as possible, selected material in a general or narrative manner, in advance of a HSAC issuance;
( ii ) To disseminate other acquisition related information; or
( iii ) To issue guidance that is expected to be effective for a period of 1 year or less.
[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 25767, May 2, 2006; 71 FR 48800, Aug. 22, 2006; 77 FR 50632, Aug. 22, 2012]
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MATTHEW COLYER and ) 

DARIUS PINEX, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) No. 12 C 04855 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) Judge Edmond E. Chang 

CITY OF CHICAGO, GILDARDO SIERRA, ) 

and RAOUL MOSQUEDA, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

ORDER

This Order explains why a particular line of defense argument is barred for 

closing argument. During other civil-rights trials over which this Court has 

presided in recent months, the defense lawyers have been making, during closing 

arguments to the jury, an argument that is likely impermissible and sounds like a 

new standard argument by the City of Chicago’s department of law. The issue 

should be addressed before closings, and the Court raises the issue on its own 

initiative because an objection during closings would only draw attention to the line 

of argument, and so it is better to address it in this setting. 

The argument is along the lines of: “Plaintiff bears the burden of proof 

because the system gives him a courtroom. The system gives him a jury. And the 

system gives him the Judge. So all we ask of Plaintiff is that he prove his case, and 

that he satisfy the burden of proof.” No objections were made by plaintiffs in the 

prior trials, and of course it is permissible to remark (even repeatedly) on the 

principle that the plaintiff bears the burden of proof. But the line of argument that 

specifically refers to linking the burden of proof to the costs of trial is impermissible. 

It risks increasing the preponderance burden-of-proof beyond its very simple 

formulation—“more likely than not”—into something more. In reacting to this 

argument, the jury might very well set the bar higher than preponderance by 

factoring-in their own jury-service burden, the taxpayers’ cost of providing a 

courtroom, and (worst and least relevant of all) the burden on the presiding judge. 

The plaintiff bears the burden because of proof in civil actions because the plaintiff 

is seeking court action to change the status quo, Schaffer ex rel. Schaffer v. Weast, 
2 

546 U.S. 49, 46 (2005), but there is no reason to tell the jury even that, and 

certainly no reason to go even farther and pile-on the costs of trial. In most cases, 

there is a constitutional right to a jury trial, so really it is the preservation of that 

important right that is the source of the costs. The line of argument is barred. 

 ENTERED: 

 s/Edmond E. Chang 

 Honorable Edmond E. Chang 

 United States District Judge 

DATE: January 26, 2015
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kevin K. Moriarty, Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Del
Taco Restaurant Properties I, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Del Taco Restaurant
Properties I;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report (the Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses
in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls; and




---



##### 



6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses. March 30, 2004
    Date:/s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. MoriartyDirector, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer 2
**Fiscal Year 2016:** $10,083,000

**Fiscal Year 2017:** $10,083,000 (Request)
32.207 Administration and payment of commercial financing payments. ( a ) *Responsibility.* The contracting officer responsible for administration of the contract shall be responsible for review and approval of contract financing requests.
( b ) *Approval of financing requests.* Unless otherwise provided in agency regulations, or by agreement with the appropriate payment official— ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall be responsible for receiving, approving, and transmitting all contract financing requests to the appropriate payment office; and
( 2 ) Each approval shall specify the amount to be paid, necessary contractual information, and the account(s) (see 32.206(d)) to be charged for the payment.
( c ) *Management of security.* After contract award, the contracting officer responsible for approving requests for financing payments shall be responsible for determining that the security continues to be adequate. If the contractor's financial condition is the Government's security, this contracting officer is also responsible for monitoring the contractor's financial condition.