alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 23 (Friday, February 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8473-8474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11352]


Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces meetings of the U.S. State 
Department's Overseas Security Advisory Council on February 23, June 8, 
and November 16,

[[Page 8474]]

2021. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. Appendix), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(7)(E), 
it has been determined that the meetings will be closed to the public. 
The meetings will focus on an examination of corporate security 
policies and procedures and will involve extensive discussion of trade 
secrets and proprietary commercial information that is privileged and 
confidential, and will discuss law enforcement investigative techniques 
and procedures. The agendas will include updated committee reports, 
global threat overviews, and other matters relating to private sector 
security policies and protective programs and the protection of U.S. 
business information overseas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-345-2214.

Jason R. Kight,
Executive Director, Overseas Security Advisory Council, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2021-02445 Filed 2-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher Partridge, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Kings. County, rendered July 24, 1962 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of unlawful entry, and sentencing him, pursuant to article 7-A of the Correction Law, to serve an indefinite term in the New York City Penitentiary. Judgment affirmed (see *People*v. *Watson,*19 A D 2d 631). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
# Asian American and Native American

# Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions Program, Part A

# FY 2016 Project Abstract

## Century College, Minneapolis, MN

Century College, a public community and technical college serving the East Metro of Minneapolis – St. Paul, Minnesota, will implement a five-year project to improve the Career and Technical Education (CTE) enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of Asian, Pacific Islander, and other disadvantaged students. The college serves large populations of students from Southeast Asian refugee communities.

The project will implement three activities to realize its goals:

Activity One:  CTE Program and Curriculum Development – CTE programs that support career pathways into high-demand careers for target population students will be further developed. Researchers will inventory and evaluate CTE-related career pathways in the East Metro. CTE faculty will receive training in culturally-relevant pedagogy and English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) strategies to better engage students in learning.

Activity Two:  Outreach to Asian, Pacific Islander, other immigrant/refugee, and low-income communities will build new partnerships to serve students while encouraging younger students’ interest in higher education. Collaborations with refugee-serving community based and workforce organizations will help build support networks around students.

Activity Three:  Student support in CTE programs – Supplemental education tutoring, career navigation, financial literacy education, and augmented ESOL learning will lead to greater enrollment, retention and graduation rates.

Funding:  $299,942

Century College AANAPISI Application May 2015 (84.031L – Part A)

10/18/2016
#### PLAQUEMINES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORRIS INSURANCE CONSULTANTS INC.; John Z. Norris, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-31155

Summary Calendar,

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 9, 2008.

Philip Frands Cossieh) Jr-> Cossichj gu_ mich & Parsioia; Cyntllia Green St. Am-ant; Allan, Kanner & Associates, New Orleans> PA, for Plaintiff-Appellant,

Heather S. Duplantis, Phelps Dunbar, Baton Rouge, LA, Christopher Michael Capitelli, Phelps Dunbar, New Orleans, BA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaquemines Parish School Board sued John Noitís and Norris Insurance Consultants Inc. (collectively, “Norris”) after Hurricane Katrina damaged a large number of Plaquemines Parish schools. The district court granted Norris summary *339judgment and entered a final judgment in his favor. We vacate the judgment.

The district court granted Norris summary judgment on the merits of the School Board’s claim *after*it had already denied a motion to remand by determining that Norris was not properly joined to this suit. The moment this case was removed to federal court and a motion to remand was filed, it was clear that Norris and the School Board were both residents of Louisiana. As a result, it was also clear that the district court did not have jurisdiction over Norris because his presence defeated complete diversity, a pre-requisite to diversity jurisdiction. Either he was properly joined to the suit — in which case the district court did not have diversity jurisdiction over this suit since there was not complete diversity and the case would need to be remanded to state court — or he was improperly joined — in which case the district court needed to dismiss Norris, so that diversity jurisdiction could be asserted over the rest of the parties. *See Florence v. Crescent Res., LLC,*484 F.3d 1293, 1297 (11th Cir .2007). Either way, the distriet court did not have jurisdiction over Norris and therefore could not adjudicate the merits of the claim against him.

Judgment VACATED. Cause REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# C_2016466EN.01000201.xml

| 14.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8004 — Akzo Nobel/BASF Industrial Coating Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 466/03)

On 28 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8004. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8004. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Communications and Outreach Home |
|                                            |

 

The Green Strides School Sustainability Resource Hub is available for all schools to access free resources on healthy, safe,  sustainable, resilient, 21st learning environments and environmental  sustainability education, that encompass all three Pillars of our U.S.  Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools recognition award.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
First Department,

September, 1964

(September 15, 1964)

#### Evelyn S. Faulk, Respondent, v. John H. Faulk, Appellant.

Order, entered on August 17, 1964, granting plaintiff wife’s motion for a temporary injunction to restrain defendant husband from prosecuting an action for divorce by defendant husband against plaintiff wife in the State of Texas, unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs to either party, and the motion denied, without costs. In the light of defendant husband’s showing of substantial indicators of Texas domicile, plaintiff wife’s evidence of his domicile in New York was not sufficient to warrant the extraordinary relief of a temporary injunction to restrain prosecution of an action in a sister State (see *Rosenstiel*v. *Rosenstiel,*15 A D 2d 880). If plaintiff wife be so advised, however, she is free to apply to Special Term for an expeditious trial of the relatively simple issue in this action, provided she offer reasonable accommodation to defendant husband, to the satisfaction of Special Term, in obtaining and offering whatever out-of-State evidence is properly required. In no event should the proceedings in this action, other than perhaps a final judgment, be made responsible for any *968delays in the action for divorce in Texas or the action for separation in New York. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.; McNally, J., concurs on constraint of *Rosenstiel*v. *Rosenstiel (supra).*
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 62 

Formalizing congressional opposition to any withdrawal from the North Atlantic Treaty, requiring the advice and consent of the Senate to modify 

or terminate the North Atlantic Treaty, and authorizing litigation to 

advance the Senate’s constitutional authority. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2018 

Mr. KAINE (for himself, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. REED, and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Formalizing congressional opposition to any withdrawal from 

the North Atlantic Treaty, requiring the advice and consent of the Senate to modify or terminate the North 

Atlantic Treaty, and authorizing litigation to advance 

the Senate’s constitutional authority. 

Whereas the President is constitutionally required to seek the 

advice and consent of the Senate in order to enter into 

a treaty on behalf of the United States and must therefore seek the advice and consent of the Senate to withdraw from a treaty: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 62 IS 

1 SECTION 1. OPPOSITION OF CONGRESS TO WITHDRAWAL 

2 FROM NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY. 

3 Congress opposes any effort to withdraw the United 

4 States from the North Atlantic Treaty, done at Wash5 ington, DC, April 4, 1949. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO RECEIVE THE ADVICE AND CON7 SENT OF THE SENATE TO MODIFY OR TERMI8 NATE THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY. 

9 The President may only withdraw from the North At10 lantic Treaty, in accordance with its terms, pursuant to 

11 the advice and consent of the Senate, provided that two 

12 thirds of the Senators present concur, or pursuant to an 

13 Act of Congress. 

14 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF SENATE LEGAL COUNSEL TO 

15 REPRESENT THE SENATE IN OPPOSITION TO 

16 WITHDRAWAL FROM NORTH ATLANTIC TREA17 TY. 

18 The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 

19 the Senate in initiating or intervening in any judicial pro20 ceedings in any Federal court of competent jurisdiction, 

21 on behalf of the Senate, in order to oppose any withdrawal 

22 of the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty and 

23 to ensure that such withdrawal is pursuant to the advice 

24 and consent of the Senate or an Act of Congress. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SJ 62 IS 

1 SEC. 4. REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

2 The Senate Legal Counsel shall report as soon as 

3 practicable to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

4 Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the 

5 House of Representatives with respect to any judicial pro6 ceedings which the Senate Legal Counsel initiates or in 

7 which it intervenes pursuant to this resolution. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-49566) of International Lease Finance Corporation
(the "Company") and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February 16,
2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appear in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 19, 2001
## Related Sites

- Title III, Part A Strengthening Institutions Program

## Other Resources

- Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) - Applicant and Grantee Resources

Institutional Service Home
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 24, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 24, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0436. KRIS GRICE v. KATHERINE REILLY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

12CV2774
#### 2452.242-70 Indirect costs.

As prescribed in 2442.705-70, insert the following clause in cost-reimbursement type solicitations and contracts when it is determined that the Contractor will be compensated for negotiated or provisional indirect cost rates pending establishment of final indirect cost rates.

# Indirect Costs (APR 1984)

(a) Pursuant to the provisions of the clause of this contract entitled, “Allowable Cost and Payment” the rates listed below are established. If the column entitled, “Ceiling Rate” has rates listed, the ceiling applies for those rates only. If there are no ceiling rates listed, ceilings do not apply to this contract and the provisions of paragraph (b) of this clause are not applicable.

| Period | Category | Provisional rate | Ceiling rate | Base |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Effective date until amended: | | | | |
| (b) For the term of this contract, the final indirect rates shall not exceed the ceiling rates listed above, if any. However, in the event the indirect rates developed by the cognizant audit activity on the basis of actual allowable costs are less than the ceiling rates agreed to herein, then the rates established by such cognizant audits shall apply (downward adjustment only). The Government shall not be obligated to pay any additional amounts on indirect rates above the ceiling rates set forth for the applicable period | | | | |

(End of clause)
## Program Authority

20 U.S.C. 1474 and 1481 of the *Individuals with Disabilities Education Act*.

 

## Applicable Regulations

      -  The Education Department General Administrative Regulations ( EDGAR ) in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99.   
      -  The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485.    
      -  The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474.  

The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants except federally recognized Indian tribes. 

The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of higher education (IHEs) only.
#### 3007.106-70 Limitations on Lead System Integrators.

See (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.570 for policy applicable to acquisition strategies that consider the use of lead system integrators.
**Program Office:** Office of Migrant Education**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants

On July 1, 1997, the US Department of Education awarded migrant education technology grants to six entities that proposed using technology in innovative ways to strengthen the academic achievement of migrant students who move between school districts. The Department made awards to applicants that applied as members of a consortium, and who were judged most likely to be effective in helping migrant children whose education is interrupted by moves between districts and States. The objectives of the grant were to: 1) promote greater continuity of instruction for migrant students as they are served in different school districts, and 2) help these migrant students achieve to high academic standards.

|Last Modified: 10/20/2005
|-------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.29

                       TELEFONOS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.

                               February 28, 2000


Mr. Samer Salameh
Prodigy Communications Corporation
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
44 South Broadway
White Plains, NY 10601

Ladies and Gentlemen:

At December 31, 1999, current liabilities of Prodigy Communications Corporation
("Prodigy") exceeded current assets by $128.1 million. Included in this amount
are loans payable to Banco Inbursa, S.A. which were arranged under the auspices
of Carso Global Telecom in the amount of $110.2 million.

This letter serves to confirm the following:

1.   Telefonos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. or any of its subsidiaries (TELMEX) will
     provide additional funding up to $200.0 million, either through capital
     and/or debt financing, to allow Prodigy to continue as a going concern for
     one year from the date of this letter.

2.   TELMEX has available capital and/or debt financing facilities necessary to
     support Prodigy's funding requirements for one year from the date of this
     letter.


Sincerely,

/s/ Adolfo Cerezo

Adolfo Cerezo
Chief Financial Officer
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 2 of 17 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 3 of 17 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 4 of 17 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 5 of 17 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 6 of 17 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 7 of 17 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 8 of 17 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 9 of 17 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 10 of 17 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 11 of 17 PageID #:11
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 12 of 17 PageID #:12
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 13 of 17 PageID #:13
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 14 of 17 PageID #:14
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 15 of 17 PageID #:15
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 16 of 17 PageID #:16
Case: 1:12-cv-05187 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 17 of 17 PageID #:17
#### 2828.203-7 Exclusion of individual sureties.

The SDO is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 28.203-7(a).
# CA2017315EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 315/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 315/1

---

CORRIGENDUM TO NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

Administrators and assistants in the buildings sector

EPSO/AD/342/17 (AD 6) — Building management engineers (including environmental and services engineers)

EPSO/AST/141/17 (AST 3)

Profile 1. Building construction coordinators/technicians

Profile 2. Building coordinators/technicians in air conditioning and electromechanical and electrical engineering

Profile 3. Occupational safety/building safety assistants

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 242 A of 27 July 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 242 A of 27 July 2017

(2017/C 315 A/01)

On page 1:

for:

for:

‘
  Deadline for registration: 12 September 2017 at 12.00 (midday), CET
  ’,

read:

read:

‘
  Deadline for registration: 26 September 2017 at 12.00 (midday), CET
  ’;

on page 6:

for:

for:

‘WHEN AND WHERE CAN I APPLY?

Apply online on the EPSO website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu by:

12 September 2017 at 12.00 (midday), CET.
  ’,

read:

read:

‘WHEN AND WHERE CAN I APPLY?

Apply online on the EPSO website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu by:

26 September 2017 at 12.00 (midday), CET.
  ’.

---