alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017337EN.01000401.xml

| 7.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 October 2017

(2017/C 337/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1707 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4427 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89535 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5418 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1473 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3720 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,816 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,36 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3039 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5766 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,2345 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5060 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4721 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1387 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6512 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5997 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0695 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7891 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5055 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 819,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9608 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,977 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,7275 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,172 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7000 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6550 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,5440 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1707

JPY

Japanese yen

132,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4427

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89535

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5418

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1473

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3720

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,816

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,36

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3039

RON

Romanian leu

4,5766

TRY

Turkish lira

4,2345

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5060

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4721

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1387

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6512

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5997

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,12

ZAR

South African rand

16,0695

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7891

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5055

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 819,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9608

PHP

Philippine peso

59,977

RUB

Russian rouble

67,7275

THB

Thai baht

39,172

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7000

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6550

INR

Indian rupee

76,5440

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                             |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                             | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of English Language Acquisition Home |
|                                             |

| **Name:**            | Melissa Escalante                                                                                                                                               |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **E-mail address:**  | Melissa.Escalante@ed.gov                                                                                                                                        |
| **Mailing address:** | U.S. Department of Education Office of English Language AcquisitionLyndon Baines Johnson Building400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Room 4W222Washington, DC 20202-6510 |
| **Telephone:**       | (202) 401-1407                                                                                                                                                  |
| **Toll Free:**       | 1-800-872-5327 or 1-800-USA-LEARN                                                                                                                               |

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
3403.704 Policy. ( a ) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is the agency head's designee for the purpose of FAR 3.704.
#### 3052.216-71 Determination of award fee.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3016.406(e)(1)(i), insert a clause substantially the same as the following:

# Determination of Award Fee (SEP 2012)

(a) The Government shall evaluate contractor performance at the end of each specified evaluation period(s) to determine the amount of award. The contractor agrees that the amount of award and the award fee methodology are unilateral decisions to be made at the sole discretion of the Government.

(b) Contractor performance shall be evaluated according to a Performance Evaluation Plan. The contractor shall be periodically informed of the quality of its performance and areas in which improvements are expected.

(c) The contractor shall be promptly advised, in writing, of the determination and reasons why the award fee was or was not earned. The contractor may submit a performance self-evaluation for each evaluation period. The amount of award is at the sole discretion of the Government but any self-evaluation received within ___ (*insert number*) days after the end of the current evaluation period will be given such consideration, as may be deemed appropriate by the Government.

(End of clause)

[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 50637, Aug. 22, 2012]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LUIS ENSUNCHO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-91-51-A, CA-97-826-AM)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luis Ensuncho, Appellant Pro Se. John Patrick Rowley, III, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Ensuncho, Nos. CR-91-51-A; CA-97-826-AM

(E.D. Va. June 9, 1997). We also deny Appellant's motion to prevent

his transfer to another facility. Inmates have no liberty interest

in placement in a particular prison and prison officials have broad

discretion in determining at which facility to house an inmate. See

Cochran v. Morris, 73 F.3d 1310, 1318 (4th Cir. 1996) (citing

Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 224 (1976)). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
28.106-6 Furnishing information. ( a ) The surety on the bond, upon its written request, may be furnished information on the progress of the work, payments, and the estimated percentage of completion, concerning the contract for which the bond was furnished.
( b ) When a payment bond has been provided, the contracting officer shall, upon request, furnish the name and address of the surety or sureties to any subcontractor or supplier who has furnished or been requested to furnish labor or material for the contract. In addition, general information concerning the work progress, payments, and the estimated percentage of completion may be furnished to persons who have provided labor or materials and have not been paid.
( c ) When a payment bond has been provided for a contract, the head of the agency or designee shall furnish a certified copy of the bond and the contract for which it was given to any person who makes a request therefor and who furnishes an affidavit that the requestor has supplied labor or materials for such work and payment therefor has not been made or that the requestor is being sued on such bond. The person who makes the request shall be required to pay such costs of preparation as determined by the head of the agency or designee to be reasonable and appropriate (see 40 U.S.C. 3133).
( d ) Section 806(a)(2) of Public Law 102-190, as amended by sections 2091 and 8105 of Public Law 103-355 (10 U.S.C. 4601 note prec.), requires that the Federal Government provide information to subcontractors on payment bonds under contracts for other than commercial products or commercial services as defined in subpart 2.1. Upon the written or oral request of a subcontractor/supplier, or prospective subcontractor/supplier, under a contract with respect to which a payment bond has been furnished pursuant to the Bonds statute, the contracting officer shall promptly provide to the requester, either orally or in writing, as appropriate, any of the following: ( 1 ) Name and address of the surety or sureties on the payment bond.
( 2 ) Penal amount of the payment bond.
( 3 ) Copy of the payment bond. The contracting officer may impose reasonable fees to cover the cost of copying and providing a copy of the payment bond.
[48 FR 42286, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 26903, June 28, 1985; 60 FR 48273, Sept. 18, 1995; 70 FR 57454, Sept. 30, 2005; 79 FR 24210, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 61029, Nov. 4, 2021; 87 FR 73899, Dec. 1, 2022]
#### 3033.102 General.
#### 252.225-7003 Report of intended performance outside the United States and Canada—Submission with offer.

As prescribed in 225.7204(a), use the following provision:

# Report of Intended Performance Outside the United States and Canada—Submission With Offer (OCT 2020)

(a) *Definition. United States*, as used in this provision, means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.

(b) The offeror shall submit, with its offer, a report of intended performance outside the United States and Canada if—

(1) The offer exceeds $15 million in value; and

(2) The offeror is aware that the offeror or a first-tier subcontractor intends to perform any part of the contract outside the United States and Canada that—

(i) Exceeds $750,000 in value; and

(ii) Could be performed inside the United States or Canada.

(c) Information to be reported includes that for—

(1) Subcontracts;

(2) Purchases; and

(3) Intracompany transfers when transfers originate in a foreign location.

(d) The offeror shall submit the report using—

(1) DD Form 2139, Report of Contract Performance Outside the United States; or

(2) A computer-generated report that contains all information required by DD Form 2139.

(e) The offeror may obtain a copy of DD Form 2139 from the Contracting Officer or via the Internet at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/formsprogram.htm.*

(End of provision)

[70 FR 20839, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 35546, June 21, 2005; 71 FR 75893, Dec. 19, 2006; 75 FR 45074, Aug. 2, 2010; 80 FR 36905, June 26, 2015; 85 FR 61504, Sept. 29, 2020]
First Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 This FIRST
Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 19, 2006, by and between BANK OF THE WEST (the “Bank”) and DIEDRICH COFFEE, INC. (the “Borrower”) with respect to the
following: 
 This Amendment shall be deemed to be a part of and subject to that certain Credit Agreement dated as of
November 4, 2005, as it may be amended from time to time, and any and all addenda and riders thereto (collectively the “Agreement”). Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meanings
as in the Agreement. To the extent that any of the terms or provisions of this Amendment conflict with those contained in the Agreement, the terms and provisions contained herein shall control. 
 WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Bank mutually desire to extend and/or modify the Agreement. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for value received and hereby acknowledged, the Borrower and the Bank agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Extension of Expiration Date. The Expiration Date provided for in Section 1.1.8 of the Agreement shall be extended to October 15, 2007.


  

	2.	Representations and Warranties. The Borrower hereby reaffirms the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement and represents that no event, which
with notice or lapse of time, could become an Event of Default, has occurred or is continuing. 

  

	3.	Confirmation of Other Terms and Conditions of the Agreement. Except as specifically provided in this Amendment, all other terms, conditions and covenants of the
Agreement unaffected by this Amendment shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect and the Borrower hereby covenants and agrees to perform and observe all terms, covenants and agreements provided for in the Agreement, as
hereby amended. 

  

	4.	Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California to which jurisdiction the parties hereto
hereby consent and submit. 

  

	5.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto as of
the date first hereinabove written. 
  

									
	BANK	 		 	BORROWER
			
	BANK OF THE WEST	 		 	DIEDRICH COFFEE, INC.
					
	BY:	 	/s/ Bruce Young	 		 	BY:	 	/s/ Sean McCarthy
	NAME:	 	Bruce Young, Vice President	 		 	NAME:	 	Sean McCarthy CFO
			
		 		 	ADDRESS:
			
		 		 	 28 Executive Park, Suite 200
 Irvine, CA 92614
# C_2018067EN.01000901.xml

| 22.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/9

---

Calls for proposals under the work programme for grants in the field of the trans-European telecommunication networks under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 568)

(2018/C 67/09)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, is hereby launching the following call for proposals in order to award grants to projects in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the 2018 Work Programme in the field of the trans-European telecommunication networks under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020.

Proposals are invited for the following three call areas:

| | CEF-TC-2018-1: eIdentification (eID) & eSignature |
| --- | --- |

CEF-TC-2018-1: eIdentification (eID) & eSignature

| | CEF-TC-2018-1: Europeana |
| --- | --- |

CEF-TC-2018-1: Europeana

| | CEF-TC-2018-1: Safer internet |
| --- | --- |

CEF-TC-2018-1: Safer internet

The total indicative budget available for proposals selected under these calls is EUR 30 million.

The deadline for the submission of proposals is 15 May 2018.

15 May 2018.

The respective call documentation is available on the CEF Telecom website:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/apply-funding/2018-cef-telecom-calls-proposals

---
Exhibit 10.36

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

 

          Agreement dated as of May 18, 1999, between US Airways, Inc., a Delaware corporation, having a place of business at Crystal Park Four, 2345 Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22227 (the"Company") and Lawrence M. Nagin, residing at 3405 "O" Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007 (the "Executive"). 

 

WITNESSETH

 

          WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company have entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of February 6, 1996 (the "Employment Agreement"); and 

 

          WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with Section 12(a) thereof.

 

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein Contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:

 

          1.  Section 4(b)(ii) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in lieu thereof:

 

     In addition to Base Salary, the Executive shall be awarded, for each fiscal year during the Employment Period, an annual bonus as shall be determined by the Board or its Human Resources Committee in accordance with theIncentive Compensation Plan as approved by the Group Board of Directors or other annual bonus plan hereafter approved by the Board ("Incentive Plan"). The Executive's target percentage under the Incentive Plan each year shall be no less than 60% of hisBase Salary (as in effect on the first day of the year) and his maximum bonus opportunity each year shall be no less than 120% of such Base Salary. The annual bonus under Section 4(b)(ii) shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Annual Bonus."

 

          2.  In all other respects the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand and, pursuant to the authorization from its Board of Directors, the Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name on its behalf, all as of the dayand year first above written.

 

 
EXECUTIVE
 
 
 
 /s/ Lawrence M. Nagin              
 
Lawrence M. Nagin
 
Executive Vice President - Corporate
 
 Affairs and General Counsel
 
 
 
US AIRWAYS, INC.
 
 
 
 /s/ Michelle V. Bryan               
 
Michelle V. Bryan
 
Senior Vice President - Human Resources
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2--CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of First Financial Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael A. Carty, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 960 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Corporation.

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is
not being filed for any other purpose.


Date: March 11, 2004


Michael A. Carty, Signed
------------------------
Michael A. Carty
frft

IN THE T]NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTTIERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Blancas, et al

v.

Cairo & Sons Roofing, et al

Case No: 12 C 2636

Judge: Thomas M. Durkin

ORDER

Motion hearing held. Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for final approval of settlement is granted.

[39] Enter Order of Final Approval of Settlement Between Plaintiffs and Defendants Cairo &

Sons Roofing Co., Inc., and Mario Cairo. The Court hereby dismisses all claims released in the

Stipulation of Settlement on the merits and with prejudice and without costs to any of the Parties

as against any other settling Party, except as provided in the Stipulation of Settlement. This

matter is dismissed without prejudice. The Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter for a

period of 120 days for the sole purpose of interpreting, implementing and enforcing this Order

and the Stipulation of Settlement consistent with its terms. After 120 days from the date of this

Order, the dismissal of this action will be deemed a dismissal with prejudice without further

order of this Court.

Cto)

Date: l2ll2ll3

*t*rr- tYl &rrfir;'

,j;jiI sI I 31H1S l'0''Si$l

)+uI-13

Z I 'Z Hd CIl 330tl0e

":l i :lli:0{l i't i rr 

-, ' ':. ','

'l - ll ,'i

Case: 1:12-cv-02636 Document #: 42 Filed: 12/12/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:258
#### 326.603-3 Deviations.

(a) There are certain instances where the application of the Buy Indian Act to an acquisition may not be appropriate. In these instances, the CO must detail the reasons in writing or via email and make a deviation determination.

(b) Some acquisitions by their very nature would make such a written determination unnecessary. For example, any order or call placed against an indefinite delivery vehicle that already has an approved deviation from the requirements of the Buy Indian Act.

(c) Deviation determinations shall be required for all other acquisitions where the Buy Indian Act is applicable and must be approved as follows:

| For a proposed contract action | The following official may authorize a deviation |
| --- | --- |
| Exceeding the micro-purchase threshold and up to $25,000 | Contracting Officer. |
| Exceeding $25,000 but not exceeding $700,000 | Chief Contracting Officer (CCO) (or the IHS Division of Acquisition Policy (DAP) Director, absent a CCO). |
| Exceeding $700,000 but not exceeding $13.5 million | IHS Competition Advocate. |
| Exceeding $13.5 million but not exceeding $68 million | Head of Contracting Activity. |
| Exceeding $68 million | HHS Office of Small & Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU), Office of the General Counsel (OGC), HHS Department Competition Advocate and
the HHS Senior Procurement Executive. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (c)

(d) Deviations may be authorized prior to issuing the solicitation when the CO makes the following determinations and takes the following actions:

(1) The CO determines after market research that there is no reasonable expectation of obtaining offers that will be competitive in terms of market price, quality and delivery from two or more responsible ISBEEs or IEEs.

(2) The deviation determination is authorized by the official listed at HHSAR 326.603-3(c) for the applicable contract action.

(e) If a deviation determination has been approved, the CO must follow the FAR and HHSAR unless specified otherwise.

(f) Acquisitions made under an authorized deviation from the requirements of the Buy Indian Act must be made in conformance with the order of precedence required by FAR Part 8.002.