alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION 

JACQUES RIVERA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

REYNALDO GUEVARA, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 12 C 4428 

Hon. Joan B. Gottschall, 

District Judge 

Hon. Mary M. Rowland, 

Magistrate Judge 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE IN 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS 

EXHIBIT 25%

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:17226
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 2 of 23 PageID #:17227
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 3 of 23 PageID #:17228
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 4 of 23 PageID #:17229
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 5 of 23 PageID #:17230
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 6 of 23 PageID #:17231
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 7 of 23 PageID #:17232
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 8 of 23 PageID #:17233
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 9 of 23 PageID #:17234
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 10 of 23 PageID #:17235
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 11 of 23 PageID #:17236
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 12 of 23 PageID #:17237
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 13 of 23 PageID #:17238
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 14 of 23 PageID #:17239
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 15 of 23 PageID #:17240
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 16 of 23 PageID #:17241
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 17 of 23 PageID #:17242
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 18 of 23 PageID #:17243
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 19 of 23 PageID #:17244
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 20 of 23 PageID #:17245
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 21 of 23 PageID #:17246
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 22 of 23 PageID #:17247
3DJH

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 313-32 Filed: 09/19/17 Page 23 of 23 PageID #:17248
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 36 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Roger W. Ferguson as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy of the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Robert P. Kogod of the District of 

8 Columbia on May 5, 2017, is filled by the appointment 

9 of Roger W. Ferguson of the District of Columbia. The 

10 appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on May 
2 

†SJ 36 ES 

1 6, 2017, or the date of the enactment of this joint resolu2 tion, whichever occurs later. 

Passed the Senate March 27, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 36 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Roger W. Fergents of the Smithsonian Institution. guson as a citizen regent of the Board of Re-
Exhibit 32(d)








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Carolina Power & Light Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark F. Mulhern, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark F. Mulhern


Mark F. Mulhern


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


May 8, 2012








This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Moffett B. Roller

mroller@rollerbauer.com

Law Offices

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Washington Dulles International Airport

45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200

Dulles, VA 20166

Phone: 202-331-3300 • Fax: 202-331-3322

Lee A. Bauer

lbauer@rollerbauer.com

November 26, 2013

Mr. Robert Finamore

Foreign Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Polling Report: Amended Application of ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet,

for Renewal and Amendment of Exemption; Docket DOT-OST-2012-0140

Dear Mr. Finamore:

We have polled the U.S. carriers on the Service List that was attached to the Amended

Application of ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet, for Renewal and Amendment of

Exemption. The original Application that was filed on August 16, 2013, requested renewal of

Interjet’s exemption authority to operate on eight U.S.-Mexico city-pairs, and the Amended

Application that was filed on November 21, 2013, requested the Department to amend Interjet’s

exemption to add authority to operate on the Guadalajara - San Antonio and Mexico City -

Laredo city-pairs.

None of the U.S. carriers on the Service List has any objection to DOT approval of the

Amended Application.

Interjet is advised that the Embassy of Mexico has forwarded to the U.S. State

Department a diplomatic note designating Interjet on the Guadalajara - San Antonio route.

Interjet understands that the Embassy has not yet sent a note designating Interjet on the Mexico

City - Laredo route although Interjet understands that this second note will be sent in the near

future.

Because Interjet is planning to introduce service between Guadalajara and San Antonio

imminently—on December 9, 2013—and wants to start marketing immediately, Interjet requests

urgent approval of its Amended Application (1) to renew its exemption, (2) to amend its

exemption to add authority on the Guadalajara - San Antonio route, and (3) to defer action on

the addition of the Mexico City - Laredo route pending receipt of the diplomatic note designating

Interjet for the latter route. Prompt approval of the renewal and the amendment will enable

Interjet to introduce new service between Guadalajara - San Antonio in time for the holiday

travel season and to provide the other public benefits cited in the Amended Application.
ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Mr. Robert Finamore

November 26, 2013

Page 2

We are serving copies of this letter by email on all parties that were served with the

Amended Application.

Respectfully submitted,

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Attorneys for

ABC Aerolineas, S.A. de C.V., d/b/a Interjet

By: ___________________________

Moffett B. Roller

cc: Service List
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                   17,539
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       59
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                          8,635
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             143,202
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    1,759
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      1,794
<LOANS>                                 289,340
<ALLOWANCE>                               3,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          470,093
<DEPOSITS>                              364,008
<SHORT-TERM>                             15,651
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                       4,354
<LONG-TERM>                              49,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  3,270
<OTHER-SE>                               33,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          470,093
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          24,090
<INTEREST-INVEST>                         6,791
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            358
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         31,239
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       13,495
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       15,854
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                    15,385
<LOAN-LOSSES>                             1,060
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          949
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                          12,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           5,728
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                4,251
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              4,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                              1.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             3.82
<LOANS-NON>                                 517
<LOANS-PAST>                                425
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                           1,236
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                          2,908
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               771
<RECOVERIES>                                208
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                         3,405
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                      3,405
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       0
        


</TABLE>
#### 26.102 Policy.

Indian organizations and Indian-owned economic enterprises shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in performing contracts awarded by Federal agencies. In fulfilling this requirement, the Indian Incentive Program allows an incentive payment equal to 5 percent of the amount paid to a subcontractor in performing the contract, if the contract so authorizes and the subcontractor is an Indian organization or Indian-owned economic enterprise.

[61 FR 39211, July 26, 1996]
#### 252.204-7001 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>  0000018540
<NAME>  CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORTION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                       8,249
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                        57
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          2,152
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                          505
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                                  2,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 13,592
<COMMON>                                                          737
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                         999
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                             1,993
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                                  3,729
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              32
<PREFERRED>                                                       293
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                            4,218
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                          90
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                  1,187
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                      60
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                           1
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                         7
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                    4
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                                  3,971
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                                  13,592
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                       3,920
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                              208
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                      3,070
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                      3,278
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                           642
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                                (69)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                                    573
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          316
<NET-INCOME>                                                      382
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                        13
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                                     369
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                          266
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                         165
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                            477
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    1.79
        

</TABLE>
This appendix is only available from MassDEP as an electronic 

file entitled “CMAQ Model Statistics for the OTR States”
## Annual Performance Report

Grantees are required to submit an Annual Performance Report (APR) annually; the collection number is OMB 1840-0766. The APR is available to grantees October 1 of each calendar year, and closes 90 days thereafter. To review the reporting requirement for Title III and Title V Programs request access to an interactive training site under the training tab located on Institutional Services’ Information Management Performance System Portal.  Once here you may select the requirements for each Title III and Title V program based on the institutional type (two-year or four-year).  This site is also available to grantees for training purposes and includes an APR user's manual.

 To gain access to the APR, contact the program office.

**Note:** If you are a project director and have responsibility for completing the annual report for your institution, please be sure you are designated on the official grant award notification and your e-mail and telephone number are listed correctly in the G5 database.

Top

## Final Performance Report

The online system will generate a final report from grantees’ individual annual reports for each grant ending September 30 of the collection period.  The online system generates the final performance so that reported data is consistent throughout the life cycle of grants and eliminates each grantee’s burden of having to compile a final report. 

Top

Institutional Service Home
# C_2018269EN.01001201.xml

| 31.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

30 July 2018

(2018/C 269/12)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1684 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,79 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4493 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89070 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2503 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1598 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,624 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,02 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2773 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6238 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,7078 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5795 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5245 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1696 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7165 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5914 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 305,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4007 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9712 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4005 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 814,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7408 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,114 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,9792 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,908 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3334 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7160 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,1965 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1684

JPY

Japanese yen

129,79

DKK

Danish krone

7,4493

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89070

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2503

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1598

ISK

Iceland króna

122,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,624

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,02

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2773

RON

Romanian leu

4,6238

TRY

Turkish lira

5,7078

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5795

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5245

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1696

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7165

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5914

KRW

South Korean won

1 305,99

ZAR

South African rand

15,4007

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9712

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4005

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 814,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7408

PHP

Philippine peso

62,114

RUB

Russian rouble

72,9792

THB

Thai baht

38,908

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3334

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7160

INR

Indian rupee

80,1965

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CIVIX-DDI, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 1:12-cv-04968 (Lead Case) 

Judge James F. Holderman 

CIVIX-DDI, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

LOOPNET, INC. 

 Defendant. 

Consolidated for pretrial purposes with: 

Case No. 1:12-cv-07091 

Case No. 1:12-cv-08632 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JOINT STIPULATION 

CoStar Realty Information, Inc. (“CoStar”) and LoopNet, Inc. (“LoopNet”), by and 

through their attorneys, and CIVIX-DDI, LLC (“CIVIX”), by and through its attorneys, hereby 

file this joint stipulation and respectfully state as follows: 

1. CIVIX agrees that CoStar and LoopNet shall have until June 13, 2014 to file reply 

papers to CIVIX’s Opposition to CoStar’s & LoopNet’s Daubert Motion to Exclude the 

Testimony of Frances McCloskey, filed on May 22, 2014. 

 
 2 

DATED: May 29, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Olivia T. Luk

 

/s/ Craig D. Leavell

Raymond P. Niro 

Paul K. Vickrey 

David J. Sheikh 

Olivia T. Luk 

Joseph A. Culig 

NIRO, HALLER & NIRO 

181 W. Madison St., Suite 4600 

Chicago, IL 60602 

Telephone: (312) 236-0733 Fax: 

Facsimile: (312) 236-3137 

Email: rniro@nshn.com

 vickrey@nshn.com

sheikh@nshn.com

 oluk@nshn.com

 jculig@nshn.com; 

 David C. Van Dyke 

Joseph W. Barber 

Emily E. Bennett 

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 

200 S. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1100 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Telephone: (312) 456-3641 

Facsimile: (312) 939-5617 

Email: dvd@h2law.com

jwbarber@howardandhoward.com

ebennett@howardandhoward.com

Attorneys for 

CIVIX-DDI, LLC 

 Craig D. Leavell 

Mary E. Zaug 

Mishele Kieffer 

Jason Fitterer 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

300 North LaSalle 

Chicago, IL 60654 

Telephone: (312) 862-2000 

Facsimile: (312) 862-2200 

Email: craig.leavell@kirkland.com

mary.zaug@kirkland.com

mishele.kieffer@kirkland.com

 jason.fitterer@kirkland.com

 Atif Khawaja (Pro Hac Vice) 

Robert A. Gretch (Pro Hac Vice) 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

601 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Email: atif.khawaja@kirkland.com

robert.gretch@kirkland.com

 Attorneys for 

CoStar Realty Information, Inc. & LoopNet, 

Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on May 29, 2014, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document 

was served upon counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF procedures. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Craig D. Leavell 

 Craig D. Leavell 

Attorney for 

CoStar Realty Information, Inc. & LoopNet, Inc.
#### Caroline Hertzog, Appellant, v. Harrison Island Shores, Inc., Respondent.

Order, entered on January 28, 1964, denying plaintiff motion to dismiss as insufficient as a matter of law the first separate and complete affirmative defense contained in defendant’s answer, 'unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the first separate and complete affirmative defense granted, with $10 costs. Plaintiff was injured on June 9, 1963, on defendant’s premises when she fell from a gangplank leading to a dock, landing on some rocks, thereby causing her injury, Defendant owns and operates a beach and yacht club at New Rochelle, N. V., and offered its facilities to plaintiff who became a member of the club and agreed to pay for the use of the facilities therein. In conjunction therewith, an agreement was entered into on May 27, 1963, which provided as follows: “ I hereby make application for membership in the Harrison Island Shores, Inc., New Rochelle, New York, for the season of 1963. If accepted, I agree to become bound by any and all laws of the club and by all rules and regulations as they now exist, or if they may be amended and waive claim for any loss to personal property, or for any personal injury while a member of said club.” Defendant sets forth the agreement as a defense to plaintiff’s action for personal injury and claims that plaintiff has waived any right for claim of loss for any personal injury while a member of the club. The language of the agreement is not sufficiently explicit to absolve defendant from its own negligence *(Kaufman*v. *American Youth Hostels,*5 N Y 2d 1016; *Van Dyke Prods,*v. *Eastman Kodak Co.,*12 N Y 2d 301). The wording of an exculpatory agreement must express as clearly as language can, the intention of the parties to absolve one of them from liability for negligence or other fault. The language of the agreement herein does not meet the test of clarity or explicitness required *860to afford defendant the benefit of a waiver. Concur'—Breitel, J. P., Valente, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.
Cherry 

in this case. Even assuming the truth of appellant's assertion that he 

handed the petition to a prison official on November 4, 2013, he fails to 

demonstrate that the petition was actually received by the district court 

on November 5, 2013, the deadline for filing a timely petition. To the 

extent that appellant contends that the petition was timely because he 

handed it to a prison official within the one-year time period, this 

argument fails as this court does not recognize the "prison mailbox rule" 

for purposes of filing a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 

See Gonzales v. State, 118 Nev. 590, 594-95, 53 P.3d 901, 903-04 (2002). 

Therefore, appellant fails to demonstrate good cause for the delay. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 1 

Hardesty 

LiCtit_v 

ear eio J. 

Douglas 

1-The opening brief does not comply with the formatting 

requirements of NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not have one-inch margins 

on all four sides. We caution appellant's counsel that future failure to 

comply with the applicable rules when filing briefs in this court may result 

in the imposition of sanctions. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 454P149 
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge 

The Williamson Law Office, PLLC 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A ce.