alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
35.017-2 Establishing or changing an FFRDC. To establish an FFRDC, or change its basic purpose and mission, the sponsor shall ensure the following: ( a ) Existing alternative sources for satisfying agency requirements cannot effectively meet the special research or development needs.
( b ) The notices required for publication (see 5.205(b)) are placed as required.
( c ) There is sufficient Government expertise available to adequately and objectively evaluate the work to be performed by the FFRDC.
( d ) The Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington, DC 20506, is notified.
( e ) Controls are established to ensure that the costs of the services being provided to the Government are reasonable.
( f ) The basic purpose and mission of the FFRDC is stated clearly enough to enable differentiation between work which should be performed by the FFRDC and that which should be performed by non-FFRDC's.
( g ) A reasonable continuity in the level of support to the FFRDC is maintained, consistent with the agency's need for the FFRDC and the terms of the sponsoring agreement.
( h ) The FFRDC is operated, managed, or administered by an autonomous organization or as an identifiably separate operating unit of a parent organization, and is required to operate in the public interest, free from organizational conflict of interest, and to disclose its affairs (as an FFRDC) to the primary sponsor.
( i ) Quantity prodution or manufacturing is not performed unless authorized by legislation.
( j ) Approval is received from the head of the sponsoring agency.
[55 FR 3885, Feb. 5, 1990, as amended at 62 FR 12694, Mar. 17, 1997]
3409.407-3 Procedures. ( b ) *Decisionmaking process.* ( 1 ) Contractors suspended in accordance with FAR 9.407 may submit, in person, in writing, or through a representative, information and argument in opposition to the suspension. The contractor must submit this information and argument within 30 days of receipt of the notice of suspension, as described in FAR 9.407-3(c).
( 2 ) In actions not based upon an indictment, if the contractor's submission in opposition raises a genuine dispute over facts material to the suspension and if no determination has been made, on the basis of Department of Justice advice, that substantial interests of the Government in pending or contemplated legal proceedings based on the same facts as the suspension would be prejudiced, the contractor may request a fact-finding conference. The Suspending Official will conduct fact-finding and base the decision in accordance with FAR 9.407-3(b)(2) and (d) and (e).
23.105 Exceptions. The following are excepted from the requirement to procure sustainable products and services: ( a ) Contracts performed or supplies delivered outside of the United States, unless the agency head determines that such application is in the interest of the United States.
( b ) Weapon systems; however, compliance with applicable agency affirmative procurement programs is required for recovered materials per 23.107-1 (see 23.109(b)) (42 U.S.C. 6962) and for alternatives for ozone depleting substances per 23.107-4 (see 23.109(d)) (42 U.S.C. 7671l), unless a written justification exists as described at 23.104(a) (42 U.S.C. 6962(c)(1) and 7 U.S.C. 8102(a)(1)(B)).
( c ) Energy-consuming products or systems designed or procured for combat or combat-related missions are not subject to the requirements in 23.107-3 (42 U.S.C. 8259b(a)(5)).
( d ) Biobased products to be used in military equipment (products or systems designed or procured for combat or combat-related missions), spacecraft systems, or launch support equipment are not subject to the requirements in 23.107-2 (7 CFR 3201.3(e)).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert A. Placek, the Chief Executive Officer of Wegener Corporation
(the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended September 1, 2006 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:



| |  | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Robert A. PlacekName:

Robert A. PlacekTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Office (Principal Executive Officer)Date:

November 30, 2006
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00394

- CV

SAMSUNG AUSTIN

SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC APPELLANT

V.

INTEGRATED AIRLINE S ERVICES

AND IAS LOGISTICS DF W, LLC APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRI CT COURT OF TARRANT C OUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 096

- 260933

- 12

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal .” It is the

court ’ s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R . App. P. 47.4.2

Each party shall bear its own costs , for which let execution issue. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: J une 4 , 2015
#### 3006.304 Approval of justification.
#### Washington Heights Federal Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiff, v. Lark Enterprises, Inc., et al., Defendants. Ralph Grimaldi et al., Copartners, Doing Business as Grimaldi Mason Contractor, et al., Appellants; and Thomas B. Martin et al., as Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund and Welfare Fund, Respondents.

In a surplus money proceeding resulting from a mortgage foreclosure action, the claimants Grimaldi and Jomido Concrete Construction Corp. appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 6, 1962, as confirmed the report of a Referee, made after a hearing and as directed payment of the surplus moneys, after allowances to the elaimants-respondents. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9



                                                     March 24, 1998


Alexander G. Bearn, M.D.
Executive Director
American Philosophical Society
104 South 5th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19106-3387

Re: RENEWAL OF CONSULTANCY AGREEMENT


Dear Alick:

         Your Consultancy Agreement with Biogen, Inc., dated April 1, 1991 (the
"Agreement"), under which you serve as a member of the Scientific Board of the
Company, expires on April 1, 1998. Biogen greatly values your input on the Board
and would like to renew the Agreement for an additional three-year period
commencing as of April 1, 1998 and ending on April 1, 2001. The terms and
conditions of the Agreement will continue to apply during the renewal term
except that compensation for your services under the Agreement during the
renewal term will be as follows:

          1. You will receive (i) a $20,000 per year retainer, (ii) $2,000 per
             day for attendance at Scientific Board meetings, plus reasonable
             travel and lodging expenses and (iii) $500 per day for time spent
             in Biogen's laboratories.

          2. Subject to approval by the Stock and Option Plan Administration
             Committee, on your renewal date, you will be granted an option to
             purchase 30,000 shares of Biogen Common Stock. The option will vest
             over three years (33-1/3% per year) and will be exercisable at a
             price equal to the average of the high and low sales prices on your
             renewal date.


                                        1
<PAGE>   2



         If you agree to renewal of the Agreement on the above terms, please
sign both copies of this letter and return one copy to the attention of Anne
Marie Cook, Associate General Counsel, Biogen, Inc., 14 Cambridge Center,
Cambridge, MA 02142.

                                                   BIOGEN, INC.

                                            By:____________________________
                                               James R. Tobin
                                               President and Chief
                                               Executive Officer


                                            By:____________________________
                                               Phillip A. Sharp
                                               Chairman of Scientific Board



                                            AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:


                                            _______________________________
                                            Alexander G. Bearn, M.D.


                                        2
EXHIBIT 10(t)(1)



               ALLONGE TO SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


Amount:  $160,000

UNDER DATE OF JUNE 30, 2003, A4S Technologies, Inc., a Montana corporation (the
"Company") made a Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note (the "Note") to the
order of Cambridge Holdings, Ltd. (the "Holder") in the principal amount of
$160,000.

The Company and the Holder hereby agree to amend the Note, as follows:

1.   The fourth sentence of Section 2 of the Additional Terms and Conditions of
     the Note is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefor:

          Except as provided in this Section 2, the Company will issue one share
          of Common Stock for each $.10 of then outstanding principal balance of
          this Note upon conversion of the Note (the "Conversion Price").

2.   Sections 5 and 6 of the Additional Terms and Conditions of the Note are
     hereby deleted.

3.   This Allonge is an amendment to the Note and does not constitute discharge
     of the Note.

This Allonge has been executed and delivered as of August 31, 2004.


                                    A4S TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                    Signature:
                                               --------------------------
                                               Michael Siemens, President

ACCEPTED:

                                    CAMBRIDGE HOLDINGS, LTD.


                                    By:
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Gregory Pusey, President



<PAGE>
217.7102 General. ( a ) Activities shall enter into master agreements for repair and alteration of vessels with all prospective contractors located within the United States or its outlying areas, which— ( 1 ) Request ship repair work; and
( 2 ) Possess the organization and facilities to perform the work satisfactorily. (Issuance of a master agreement does not indicate approval of the contractor's facility for any particular acquisition and is not an affirmative determination of responsibility under FAR subpart 9.1 for any particular acquisition.)
( b ) Activities may use master agreements in work with prospective contractors located outside the United States and its outlying areas.
( c ) Activities may issue job orders under master agreements to effect repairs, alterations, and/or additions to vessels belonging to foreign governments. ( 1 ) Contractors shall treat vessels of a foreign government as if they were vessels of the U.S. Government whenever requested to do so by the contracting officer.
( 2 ) Identify the vessel and the foreign government in the solicitation and job order.
[56 FR 36345, July 31, 1991, as amended at 70 FR 35544, June 21, 2005]
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K/A    of International Lease Finance Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual    report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this annual report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual    report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that    has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially    affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial    reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal controls over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: August 11, 2006 /s/  Steven    F. Udvar-Hazy    Steven F. Udvar-Hazy*Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer*
Exhibit
32(f)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter M. Scott III, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Peter M. Scott
III


Peter M.
Scott III


Executive
Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer


May 9,
2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Legislation

**Program Authority**

- The Rural Postsecondary & Economic Development program is authorized under 20 U.S.C. 1138-1138d; the Explanatory Statement accompanying Division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (Pub. L. 117-328). 
- Note:  Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Federal civil rights laws.

Regulations

- There are no program-specific regulations.
- (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations ( Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR)  in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99.  (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The Administrative Priorities. (e) The Supplemental Priorities.

FIPSE Home
#### 252.225-7033 Waiver of United Kingdom levies.

As prescribed in 225.1101(8), use the following clause:

# Waiver of United Kingdom Levies (APR 2003)

(a) The U.S. Government may attempt to obtain a waiver of any commercial exploitation levies included in the price of this contract, pursuant to the U.S./United Kingdom (U.K.) reciprocal waiver agreement of July 1987. If the U.K. grants a waiver of levies included in the price of this contract, the U.S. Government reserves the right to reduce the contract price by the amount of the levy waived plus associated indirect costs and profit or fee.

(b) If the Contractor contemplates award of a subcontract exceeding $1 million to a U.K. firm, the Contractor shall provide the following information to the Contracting Officer before award of the subcontract:

(1) Name of the U.K. firm.

(2) Prime contract number.

(3) Description of item to which the levy applies.

(4) Quantity being acquired.

(5) Amount of levy plus any associated indirect costs and profit or fee.

(c) In the event of difficulty in identifying levies included in a price from a prospective subcontractor, the Contractor may seek advice through the Director of Procurement, United Kingdom Defence Procurement Office, British Embassy, 3100 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20006.

(d) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (d), in any subcontract for supplies where a lower-tier subcontract exceeding $1 million with a U.K. firm is anticipated.

(End of clause)

[68 FR 15639, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 73 FR 53155, Sept. 15, 2008; 78 FR 59859, Sept. 30, 2013]
# C_2018181EN.01000201.xml

| 28.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 May 2018

(2018/C 181/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1675 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4485 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87540 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1922 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1593 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4888 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,765 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 319,90 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3090 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6297 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,5153 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5424 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5126 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1589 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6882 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5652 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 259,55 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5938 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4611 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3905 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 475,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6467 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,441 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,4935 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,290 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2554 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,8883 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,1505 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1675

JPY

Japanese yen

127,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4485

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87540

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1922

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1593

ISK

Iceland króna

123,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4888

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,765

HUF

Hungarian forint

319,90

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3090

RON

Romanian leu

4,6297

TRY

Turkish lira

5,5153

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5424

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5126

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1589

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6882

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5652

KRW

South Korean won

1 259,55

ZAR

South African rand

14,5938

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4611

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3905

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 475,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6467

PHP

Philippine peso

61,441

RUB

Russian rouble

72,4935

THB

Thai baht

37,290

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2554

MXN

Mexican peso

22,8883

INR

Indian rupee

79,1505

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---