UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERNDIVISION

TJNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MARCINMALARZ

No. 12 CR 543

Judge Charles R. Norgle

AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOYERNING DISCOVERY

Upon the agreed motion filed by the government, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

16(d) and 18 U.S.C. $ 3771(aXl) and (8), it is hereby ORDERED:

1. All of the materials provided by the United States in preparation for, or in

connection with, any stage of the proceedings in this case (collectively, "the materials")

are subject to this protective order and may be used by defendant and defendant's counsel

(defined as counsel of record in this case) solely in connection with the defense of this

case, and for no other pu{pose, and in connection with no other proceeding, without

further order of this Court.

2. Defendant and defendant's counsel shall not disclose the materials or their

contents directly or indirectly to any person or entity other than persons employed to

assist in the defense, persons who are interviewed as potential witnesses, counsel for

potential witnesses, and other persons to whom the Court may authoize disclosure

(collectively, ooauthorized persons"). Potential witnesses and their counsel may be shown

copies of the materials as necessary to prepare the defense, but may not retain copies

without prior permission of the Court.
3. Defendant, defendant's counsel, ffid authorized persons shall not copy or

reproduce the materials except in order to provide copies of the materials for use in

connection with this case by defendant, defendant's counsel, and authorized persons.

Such copies and reproductions shall be treated in the same manner as the original

materials.

4. Defendant, defendant's counsel, and authorized persons shall not disclose

any notes or records of any kind that they make in relation to the contents of the

materials, other than to authorized persons, and all such notes or records are to be treated

in the same manner as the original materials.

5. Before providing materials to an authorized person, defense counsel must

provide the authorized person with a copy of this Order.

6. Upon conclusion of all stages of this case, all of the materials and all copies

made thereof shall be disposed of in one of three ways, unless otherwise ordered by the

Court. The materials may be (l) destroyed; (2) returned to the United States; or (3)

retained in defense counsel's case file. The Court may require a certification as to the

disposition of any such materials. In the event that the materials are retained by defense

counsel, the restrictions of this Order continue in effect for as long as the materials are so

maintained, and the materials may not be disseminated or used in connection with any

other matter without further order of the Court.

7. To the extent any material is produced by the United States to defendant or

defendant's counsel by mistake, the United States shall have the right to request the

return of the material and shall do so in writing. Within five days of the receipt of such a
request, defendant and/or defendant's counsel shall refurn all such material if in hard

copy, and in the case of electronic materials, shall certiff in writing that all copies of the

specified material have been deleted from any location in which the material was stored.

8. The restrictions set forth in this Order do not apply to documents that are or

become part of the public court record, including documents that have been received in

evidence at other trials, nor do the restrictions in this Order limit defense counsel in the

use of discovery materials in judicial proceedings in this case.

9. Nothing contained in this Order shall preclude any party from applying to

this Court for further relief or for modification of any provision hereof.

zl/ry JUDGE CHARLES R. NO GLE

United States District Court

Northern District of Illinois

Date: July . 2017