alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7/31/2015 Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) CO2 Budget Trading Program ­ Home

http://www.rggi.org/ 1/1

Home | Contact RGGI, Inc. | Sitemap | Mailing List

Countdown to Auction 29

September 9, 2015 :

40

Media

Room >>

Success

Stories >>

Auction

Materials >>

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

an initiative of the Northeast and Mid­Atlantic States of the U.S.

RGGI, Inc. RGGI Benefits CO Auctions, Tracking & Offsets Program Design News & Releases Documents

Upcoming Auctions

Auction 29

September 9, 2015

Auction 30 Potential Date

December 2, 2015

Auctions RSS Feed

Welcome

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is the first market­based regulatory

program in the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. RGGI is a

cooperative effort among the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland,

Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont to cap and

reduce CO emissions from the power sector.

Following a comprehensive 2012 Program Review, the RGGI states implemented a

new 2014 RGGI cap of 91 million short tons. The RGGI CO cap then declines 2.5

percent each year from 2015 to 2020. The RGGI CO cap represents a regional

budget for CO emissions from the power sector. See Program Overview for more

information.

States sell nearly all emission allowances through auctions and invest proceeds in

energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other consumer benefit programs. These

programs are spurring innovation in the clean energy economy and creating green

jobs in the RGGI states.

This website provides a portal for official user platforms, state applications, and

materials for participants in RGGI, as well as current information about the status

of RGGI auctions and state rules.

If you would like to receive email updates on RGGI CO allowance auction notices,

auction results, and other news, subscribe to the free RGGI Mailing List.

RGGI Inc. is a nonprofit corporation created to provide technical and administrative services to the

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative CO budget trading programs of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,

Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont.

NOTICE:

July 29, 2015

Board of Directors

Meeting to be Held

Sept. 4, 2014

Notice >

NOTICE:

July 13, 2015

Auction 29 Notice

and Materials

Available

Materials >

RELEASE:

June 5, 2015

Auction 28

Clearing Price $5.50

Quantity Sold:

15,507,571

Release>>

More Results>

NOTICE:

May 27, 2015

Report on the

Secondary Market for

RGGI CO

Allowances: Q1 2015

Report >>

Search...

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 457 

To authorize testimony and representation in Kuwait & Gulf Link Transport 

Co., et al. v. John Doe, et al. (Ct. of Common Pleas, Cumberland County, 

Pa.). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2018 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in Kuwait & Gulf 

Link Transport Co., et al. v. John Doe, et al. (Ct. of 

Common Pleas, Cumberland County, Pa.). 

Whereas, in the case of Kuwait & Gulf Link Transport Co., 

et al. v. John Doe, et al., Case No. 2012–1820–CIVIL 

TERM, pending in the Court of Common Pleas for Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, deposition testimony has 

been subpoenaed from Richard Goldberg, a former employee in the office of Senator Mark Kirk, relating to his 

official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 457 ATS 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former employees of the Senate with 

respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 

relating to their official responsibilities; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Richard Goldberg is authorized to tes2 tify in the case of Kuwait & Gulf Link Transport Co., et 

3 al. v. John Doe, et al., except concerning matters for which 

4 a privilege should be asserted. 

5 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

6 represent Richard Goldberg in connection with the testi7 mony authorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
241.102 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to purchase of utility services from nonregulated and regulated utility suppliers. It includes the acquisition of liquefied petroleum gas as a utility service when purchased from regulated utility suppliers.
( b ) ( 7 ) This part does not apply to third party financed projects. However, it may be used for any purchased utility services directly resulting from such projects, including those authorized by— ( A ) 10 U.S.C. 2394 for energy, fuels, and energy production facilities for periods not to exceed 30 years;
( B ) 10 U.S.C. 2394a for renewable energy for periods not to exceed 25 years;
( C ) 10 U.S.C. 2917 for geothermal resources that result in energy production facilities;
( D ) 10 U.S.C. 2809 for potable and waste water treatment plants for periods not to exceed 32 years; and
( E ) 10 U.S.C. 2812 for lease/purchase of energy production facilities for periods not to exceed 32 years.
[63 FR 11539, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 87 FR 15818, Mar. 18, 2022]
# C_2016365EN.01000101.xml

| 4.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8169 — Verlinvest/CRC/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 365/01)

On 9 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8169. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8169. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy, pursuant to NSF regulations, the National Science Foundation Act, and the Government in the Sunshine Act, hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE:

Monday, February 8, 2021, from 10:00-11:00 a.m. EST.

# PLACE:

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The agenda of the teleconference is: Chair's opening remarks, discussion of the next NSF strategic plan.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Kathy Jacquart,                         *kjacquar@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. To listen to this teleconference, members of the public must send an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference. The National Science Board Office will send requesters a toll-free dial-in number. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *https://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​index.jsp.*                         Please refer to the National Science Board website at                               ( print page 8225)    *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2021-02374 Filed 2-2-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40173 

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT C. GRIFFIN,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CR-93-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 20, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court did not err in denying Robert C. Griffin

a decrease in his Sentencing Guidelines offense level on the

ground that he twice tested positive for the use of cocaine while

he was on pretrial release. United States v. Siebe, 58 F.3d 161,

163 (5th Cir. 1995). Nor did the Government breach the plea

agreement by not moving for a downward departure. United States

v. Underwood, 61 F.3d 306, 312 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
251.101 Policy. ( a ) (1) Notwithstanding the restriction at FAR 51.101(a)(1), contracting officers may authorize contractors to use Defense Logistics Agency Energy as a source of fuel in performance of other than cost-reimbursement contracts, when the fuel is funded by the Defense Working Capital Fund. When providing this authorization to contractors, follow the procedures at PGI 251.101.
[85 FR 53684, Aug. 31, 2020]
');
	document.write('

August 2009

Dear School and Education Community Leaders:

At this  time when you are making critical and far-reaching budget and program decisions  for the upcoming school year, I write to bring to your attention the importance  of the arts as a core academic subject and part of a complete education for all  students.  The Elementary and Secondary  Education Act (ESEA) defines the arts as a core subject, and the arts play a  significant role in children’s development and learning process.

In June,  we received the 2008 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in the  Arts results for music and visual arts.  I  was reminded of the important role that arts education plays in providing  American students with a well-rounded education.  The arts can help students become tenacious, team-oriented  problem solvers who are confident and able to think creatively.  These qualities can be especially important in  improving learning among students from economically disadvantaged circumstances.  However, recent NAEP results found that only  57 percent of 8th graders attended schools where music instruction  was offered at least three or four times a week, and only 47 percent attended  schools where visual arts were offered that often.

Under ESEA,  states and local school districts have the flexibility to support the arts.  Title I, Part A of ESEA funds arts education to  improve the achievement of disadvantaged students.  Funds under Title II of ESEA can be used for  professional development of arts teachers as well as for strategic partnerships  with cultural, arts, and other nonprofit organizations.  In addition, the Department’s Arts in  Education program supports grants for model program development and  dissemination and for professional development for arts educators.  Moreover, local school districts can use funds  under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund through the American Recovery and  Reinvestment Act for the arts along with other district expenses.

Because  of the importance of the arts in a well-rounded curriculum, the Department of  Education’s National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) plans to undertake  a survey to assess the condition of arts education in grades K-12.  This fall, elementary and secondary  principals will be asked about their schools’ offerings in music, dance,  theater, and visual arts.  Next spring,  NCES will survey elementary classroom teachers as well as music and visual arts  specialists at the elementary and secondary levels about their programs and  resources.  In early 2011, the Department  expects to begin reporting findings from this comprehensive profile, the first  since the 1999-2000 school year.  This  data will help practitioners and policymakers make more informed decisions  about arts education.

| | Sincerely, 
| | -----------
| | /s/        
| | Arne Duncan
228.102-70 Defense Environmental Restoration Program construction contracts. For Defense Environmental Restoration Program construction contracts entered into pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2701— ( a ) Any rights of action under the performance bond shall only accrue to, and be for the exclusive use of, the obligee named in the bond;
( b ) In the event of default, the surety's liability on the performance bond is limited to the cost of completion of the contract work, less the balance of unexpended funds. Under no circumstances shall the liability exceed the penal sum of the bond;
( c ) The surety shall not be liable for indemnification or compensation of the obligee for loss or liability arising from personal injury or property damage, even if the injury or damage was caused by a breach of the bonded contract; and
( d ) Once it has taken action to meet its obligations under the bond, the surety is entitled to any indemnification and identical standard of liability to which the contractor was entitled under the contract or applicable laws and regulations.
[68 FR 36945, June 20, 2003]
# C_2018319EN.01000101.xml

| 10.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 319/01)

Last publication

OJ C 311, 3.9.2018

Past publications

OJ C 301, 27.8.2018

OJ C 294, 20.8.2018

OJ C 285, 13.8.2018

OJ C 276, 6.8.2018

OJ C 268, 30.7.2018

OJ C 259, 23.7.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
232.602 Responsibilities. ( b ) Disbursing officers are those officials designated to make payments under a contract or to receive payments of amounts due under a contract. The disbursing officer is responsible for determining the amount and collecting contract debts whenever overpayments or erroneous payments have been made. The disbursing officer also has primary responsibility when the amounts due and dates for payment are contained in the contract, and a copy of the contract has been furnished to the disbursing officer with notice to collect as amounts become due.
[56 FR 36409, July 31, 1991, as amended at 70 FR 75413, Dec. 20, 2005. Redesignated and amended at 80 FR 58633, Sept. 30, 2015]
315.404-2 Information to support proposal analysis. ( a ) ( 2 ) When some or all information sufficient to determine the reasonableness of the proposed cost or price is already available or can be obtained from the cognizant audit agency, or by other means including data obtained through market research (See FAR part 10 and HHSAR part 310) the contracting officer may request less-than-complete field pricing support (specifying in the request the information needed) or may waive in writing the requirement for audit and field pricing support by documenting the file to indicate what information will be used. When field-pricing support is required, contracting officers shall make the request through the HCA.
#### Albritton *v.*Tygart.

January 15, 1913.

From Berrien superior court. .Motion to dismiss.

*J. W. Powell*and *W. Q. Harrison,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hendricks £ Christian,*contra.

Hill, J.

Section 6160 of the Civil Code provides: “Within ten days after the bill of exceptions is signed and certified, the party plaintiff therein shall serve a copy thereof upon the opposite party or his attorney, and if there be several parties with different attorneys, upon each, with a return of such service (or acknowledgment of service) indorsed upon or annexed to such bill of exceptions; and they alone are parties defendant in the Supreme Court who are thus served.” Accordingly, where the bill of exceptions shows only an entry signed by counsel for the plaintiff in error, certifying that “we have this day served counsel for defendant in error by mailing them a copy of the original bill'of exceptions in the Post-Office at Nashville, Ga.,” and no other service, or acknowledgment of service, or waiver of service appears, the bill of exceptions will be dismissed. *Clark*v. *Lyon,*48 *Ga.*125.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### 252.237-7008 Group interment.

As prescribed in 237.7003(a) and (a)(6), use the following clause:

# Group Interment (DEC 1991)

The Government will pay the Contractor for supplies and services provided for remains interred as a group on the basis of the number of caskets furnished, rather than on the basis of the number of persons in the group.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 3416, Jan. 23, 2006; 84 FR 48506, Sept. 13, 2019]
#### 31.205-29 Plant protection costs.

Costs of items such as (a) wages, uniforms, and equipment of personnel engaged in plant protection, (b) depreciation on plant protection capital assets, and (c) necessary expenses to comply with military requirements, are allowable.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Colonial Sand & Stone Co., Inc., and Local Union No. 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America.

Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
# C_2018274EN.01000201.xml

| 6.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

3 August 2018

(2018/C 274/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1588 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4526 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3193 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1528 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5410 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,657 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 320,75 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2612 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6202 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,8958 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5689 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5085 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0955 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7170 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5838 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 303,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4869 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9195 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4068 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 760,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7164 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,503 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,3448 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,547 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3394 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6300 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,5120 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1588

JPY

Japanese yen

129,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4526

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89050

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3193

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1528

ISK

Iceland króna

123,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5410

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,657

HUF

Hungarian forint

320,75

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2612

RON

Romanian leu

4,6202

TRY

Turkish lira

5,8958

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5689

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5085

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0955

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7170

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5838

KRW

South Korean won

1 303,12

ZAR

South African rand

15,4869

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9195

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4068

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 760,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7164

PHP

Philippine peso

61,503

RUB

Russian rouble

73,3448

THB

Thai baht

38,547

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3394

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6300

INR

Indian rupee

79,5120

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# ' F--6ffli-#( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 24-0176

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:
VIRGINIA E. UPCHURCH,
Petitioner and Appellee,

and
JOHANNES C. UPCHURCH,
Respondent and Appellant. 

### SECOND ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

Quentin Rhoades the mediator previously appointed in this matter, has been replaced. Accordingly, Quentin Rhoades’s order of medi ator appointment is hereby rescinded and
IT IS ORDERED THAT Cory R. Gangle whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P ., 7(4)(e), is hereby appoin ted to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d)
shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counse l of record fo r the parties, or to the parties individually if not represen ted by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this 10th day of April 2024.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: William Lower, Megan S. Winderl, Cory R. Gangle 04/10/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0176