alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

44807009V1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

GERARDO ARANDA GRANT ) 

BIRCHMEIER, STEPHEN PARKES, and ) 

REGINA STONE, on behalf of themselves ) 

and classes of others similarly situated, ) Case No. 12-cv-4069 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly 

 v. ) 

 ) 

CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINE, INC., ) 

ECONOMIC STRATEGY GROUP, ) 

ECONOMIC STRATEGY GROUP, INC., ) 

ECONOMIC STRATEGY, LLC., ) 

THE BERKLEY GROUP, INC. and ) 

VACATION OWNERSHIP MARKETING ) 

TOURS, INC., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

 Defendants, CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINE, INC. and VACATION OWNERSHIP 

MARKETING TOURS, INC., appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh 

Circuit, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, from the Final Order Regarding Objections to the Special 

Master's Awards of Calls Dated May 17, 2019 and December 2, 2019 (the "Final Order"), entered 

by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on August 4, 2020, Docket No. 867. 

Dated: September 2, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jeffrey Backman 

Jeffrey Backman, Florida Bar No. 662501 

John H. Pelzer, Florida Bar No. 376647 

Greenspoon Marder LLP 

200 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 1800 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301- 

954.527.2469 

John.pelzer@gmlaw.com

dotti.cassidy@gmlaw.com

Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 874 Filed: 09/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:51197
2 

44807009V1

John H. Pelzer, Esq. 

Jeffrey Backman, Esq. 

John.pelzer@gmlaw.com

Dotti.cassidy@gmlaw.com

Jeffreybackman@gmlaw.com 

Khia.joseph@gmlaw.com

Richard J. Prendergast, Esq. 

Michael T. Layden, Esq. 

rprendergast@rjpltd.com

mlayden@rjpltd.com

Kevin M. Forde, Esq. 

Brian P. O'Neara, Esq. 

Joanne R. Driscoll, Esq. 

kforde@fordellp.com

bomeara@fordellp.com

jdriscoll@fordellp.com

M. Peebles Harrison, Esq. 

peebles@outerbankslaw.com

Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 874 Filed: 09/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:51198
Exhibit 10.15


                          FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
            1997 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.


          WHEREAS, US Airways Group, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the
1997 Stock Incentive Plan of US Airways Group, Inc. (the "Plan"); and

          WHEREAS, Section 13 of the Plan provides that the Human Resources
Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors of the Company may
amend the Plan from time to time, subject to the limitations therein, and

          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as provided
herein.

          NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

          The second sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended by
deleting the number "750,000" therein and inserting, in lieu thereof, the
number "1,500,000".

          This First Amendment shall be effective as of September 13, 1999,
the date of its adoption by the Committee.
2801.601 General. ( a ) In accordance with Attorney General Order 1687-93, the authority vested in the Attorney General (AG) with respect to contractual actions for goods and services is delegated to the following officials to serve as HCAs: ( 1 ) Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF);
( 2 ) Director, Bureau of Prisons (BOP);
( 3 ) Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA);
( 4 ) Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);
( 5 ) Director, Federal Prison Industries (FPI/UNICOR);
( 6 ) Inspector General, Office of the Inspector General (OIG);
( 7 ) Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs (OJP);
( 8 ) Director, U.S. Marshals Service (USMS); and
( 9 ) Assistant Attorney General for Administration (AAG/A) (for the Offices, Boards, and Divisions).
( b ) The acquisition authority delegated to the officials in paragraph (a) of this section may be redelegated to subordinate officials as necessary for the efficient and proper administration of the Department's acquisition operations, unless otherwise prohibited by the FAR or JAR. Such redelegated authority shall expressly state whether it carries the power of redelegation of authority.
#### 222.7405 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.222-7006, Restrictions on the Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements, in all solicitations and contracts (including task orders or delivery orders and bilateral modifications adding new work) valued in excess of $1 million utilizing funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-118) or subsequent DoD appropriations acts, except in contracts for the acquisition of commercial products, including commercially available off-the-shelf items, or commercial services.

[76 FR 38048, June 29, 2011, as amended at 88 FR 6583, Jan. 31, 2023]
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.46 N 76.63 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT
10.4


 


[English Translation]


 


LOAN AGREEMENT


 


Lender (“Party A”):    Jinjiang
Weili Weaving Industrial Co., Ltd.


 


Borrower (“Party B”): Shenzhen Trony Science and Technology Development
Co., Ltd.


 


WHEREAS, Party B has good enterprise development
prospects, and is in urgent need of funds to rapidly expand production capacity
in order to meet fast-growing market demand. For purposes of supporting Party B’s
development, Party A and Party B hereby enter into this agreement (this “Agreement”)
with respect to an interest-free loan made by Party A to Party B for purchase
of equipment:


 


1.                                      Amount of
Loan: The loan made by Party A to Party B shall be RMB305 Million.


 


2.                                      Form of
Loan: Party A shall make and release the loan in installments as requested by
Party B.


 


3.                                      Interest on
Loan: No interest shall be paid on the loan made by Party A to Party B during
the term of loan.


 


4.                                      Term of Loan:
The term of loan shall be two (2) years from April 10, 2008 to April 10,
2010.


 


5.                                      Repayment
Schedule and Method: Party B may, in its sole discretion, make arrangements for
the repayment schedule and method during the term of loan based on its
operation condition. Prior to the expiration of this Agreement, Party A and
Party B may renew this agreement through mutual agreement if Party B fails to
make the repayment as agreed.


 


6.                                      Disputes
Resolution: Any dispute arising in the course of the performance of this
Agreement shall be settled by the parties through friendly consultation, or may
be mediated by a third party or, if no settlement can be reached through
mediation, either party may bring an action in a People’s Court.


 


7.                                      This Agreement
shall be executed in two (2) copies with each of Party A and Party B
holding one (1) copy, and shall become effective after being signed or
sealed by both parties.


 


 


	
  Party A: Jinjiang Weili Weaving Industrial Co.,
  Ltd.

  	
   

  	
  Party B: Shenzhen Trony
  Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  (Seal)

  	
   

  	
  (Seal)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date: April 9, 2008

  	
   

  	
  Date: April 9, 2008
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

In re GROUPON, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

:

:

:

:

:

:

Master File No.: 12 CV 2450 

CLASS ACTION

This Document Relates To 

ALL CASES

:

:

:

:

:

:

Hon. Charles R. Norgle

NOTICE OF MOTION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 3, 2013 at 10:30 a.m., counsel for Lead Plaintiff 

Michael Carter Cohn shall appear before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle or any judge sitting in 

his stead in the courtroom usually occupied by him (Room 2341) of the Everett McKinley 

Dirksen United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60604, and present 

Lead Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Instanter Surreply in Response to New Arguments 

Raised in Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Reply Briefs, a copy of which motion is filed and 

served upon you.

Dated: April 26, 2013

POMERANTZ GROSSMAN HUFFORD

DAHLSTROM & GROSS LLP

/s/ Louis C. Ludwig

Patrick V. Dahlstrom

Joshua B. Silverman

Louis C. Ludwig

Ten South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Phone: 312-377-1181 

Fax: 312-377-1184

pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com

jbsilverman@pomlaw.com

lcludwig@pomlaw.com

Case: 1:12-cv-02450 Document #: 142 Filed: 04/26/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2404
2

POMERANTZ GROSSMAN HUFFORD

DAHLSTROM & GROSS LLP

Marc I. Gross

Jeremy A. Lieberman

Matthew L. Tuccillo

600 3rd Avenue, 20th Floor

New York, New York 10016

Phone: 212-661-1100

Fax: 212-661-8665

CAFFERTY CLOBES MERIWETHER 

& SPRENGEL LLP

Dom J. Rizzi

30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3200

Chicago, Illinois 60602

Phone: 734-769-2144

Fax: 734-769-1207

BRONSTEIN GEWIRTZ & 

GROSSMAN LLC

Peretz Bronstein

Edward N. Gewirtz

Neil D. Grossman

60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4600

New York, New York 10165

Phone: 212-697-6484

Fax: 212-697-7296

Lead Counsel and Proposed Class Counsel

Case: 1:12-cv-02450 Document #: 142 Filed: 04/26/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2405
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                           2,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,736
<PP&E>                                           3,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                     717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,834
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,861
<SALES>                                         26,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           11,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,413
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2013

                - List of Grantees and Contact Information  MS Excel (57K) | PDF (241K)

## FY 2010

                - Project Abstracts  MS Word (384K) | PDF (689K)

## FY 2008

                - New Awards MS Excel (37K) | PDF (49K)
                - Project Abstracts  MS Word (303K) | PDF (196K)

Student Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cr−00540

Honorable Ruben Castillo

Byron Wilson, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, May 12, 2015:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo:as to Byron Wilson and

Darnell Wright: Jury trial held on 5/12/2015 and continued to 5/13/2015 at 9:45 a.m.

Mailed notice (rao, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cr-00540 Document #: 204 Filed: 05/12/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1679
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19-0070 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. ARTHUR RAY PEOPLES,

Defendant and Appellant. ORDER

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for oral argument before the Court sitting en banc and is hereby set for argument on Wednesday, July 7, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. in the Courtroom ofthe Montana Supreme Court, Joseph P. Mazurek Justice Building,Helena,Montana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to M.R. App. P. 17(3), oral argument times in this cause number shall be forty (40) minutes for the Appellant and thirty (30) minutes for the Appellee. Counsel should be mindful ofthe provisions ofM.R.App.P. 17(6). The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Robert B.Allison, District Judge. DATED this Alay ofMay,2021. For the Court, ChiefJustice


### MAY 2 0 2021
Bowen Greenwood Slerk of Supreme Cour. State of Fv1c-,t:-Inp 05/20/2021
Case Number: DA 19-0070
# C_2017361EN.01003001.xml

| 25.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/30

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 October 2017

(2017/C 361/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1761 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4433 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89303 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6475 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1613 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3883 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,583 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,53 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2403 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6013 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,3751 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5117 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4875 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1803 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7008 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6023 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 327,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1396 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8022 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5130 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 937,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9849 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,801 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,6090 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,035 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8022 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,4841 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,5790 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1761

JPY

Japanese yen

133,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4433

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89303

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6475

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1613

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3883

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,583

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,53

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2403

RON

Romanian leu

4,6013

TRY

Turkish lira

4,3751

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5117

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4875

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1803

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7008

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6023

KRW

South Korean won

1 327,81

ZAR

South African rand

16,1396

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8022

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5130

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 937,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9849

PHP

Philippine peso

60,801

RUB

Russian rouble

67,6090

THB

Thai baht

39,035

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8022

MXN

Mexican peso

22,4841

INR

Indian rupee

76,5790

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
## FY 2022

Number of new awards: 2Total new awards funded: $1,978,888

## FY 2021

Number of new awards: 1Total new awards funded: $990,000
22.1403 Waivers. ( a ) The Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs of the U.S. Department of Labor (Director of OFCCP), may waive the application of any or all of the terms of the clause at 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities, for— ( 1 ) Any contract if a waiver is deemed to be in the national interest; or
( 2 ) Groups or categories of contracts if a waiver is in the national interest and it is— ( i ) Impracticable to act on each request individually; and
( ii ) Determined that the waiver will substantially contribute to convenience in administering the Act.
( b ) The head of an agency may waive any requirement in this subpart when it is determined that the contract is essential to the national security, and that its award without complying with such requirements is necessary to the national security. Upon making such a determination, the head of the agency shall notify the Director of OFCCP in writing within 30 days.
( c ) The contracting officer shall submit requests for waivers in accordance with agency procedures.
( d ) A waiver granted for a particular class of contracts may be withdrawn for any contract within that class whenever considered necessary by the Director of OFCCP to achieve the purposes of the Act. The withdrawal shall not apply to contracts awarded before the withdrawal. The withdrawal shall not apply to solicitations under any means of formal sealed bidding unless it is made more than 10 days before the date set for bid opening.
[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 19803, May 27, 1987; 63 FR 34074, June 22, 1998; 79 FR 43578, July 25, 2014]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA HAYTHORN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 12 C 5197

)

JIM DOHERTY #151, NATIONAL )

RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION )

d/b/a AMTRAK, )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Angela Haythorn ("Haythorn") has sued Jim Doherty ("Doherty") and National Railroad

Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), claiming a deprivation of constitutional rights resulting from

an altercation between Haythorn and Doherty (an Amtrak employee). Unfortunately for

Haythorn, her counsel's expenditure of $350 of her money to file this action has been

extraordinarily ill-considered.

Complaint Count I, advanced against Doherty in his individual capacity under the

purported auspices of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("Section 1983"), is totally mistaken in asserting that he

"was acting under color of state law, ordinance and/or regulations or statutes") (Complaint ¶ 5). 

It has been clear for over 17 years that Amtrak is an agency or instrumentality of the United

States for the purpose of individual rights guaranteed against the Government by the Constitution

(Lebron v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 513 U.S. 374, 394 (1995)). And that being so, no federal

subject matter jurisdiction is conferred by Section 1983 (which applies by its terms to State

actors). 

Case: 1:12-cv-05197 Document #: 5 Filed: 07/06/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:10
Complaint Count II is asserted against Amtrak under respondeat superior principles, with

that count invoking supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367. With no federal

underpinning provided by Count I, that claim fails as well.

Accordingly both the Complaint and this action are dismissed. This memorandum

opinion and order has been issued sua sponte in accordance with the teaching of Wernsing v.

Thompson, 423 F. 3d 732, 743 (7th Cir. 2005) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted):

Jurisdiction is the power to declare law, and without it the federal courts cannot

proceed. Accordingly, not only may the federal courts police subject matter

jurisdiction sua sponte, they must.

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: July 6, 2012.

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-05197 Document #: 5 Filed: 07/06/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:11
#### James D. Fish, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, *v.*Joseph Hayward et al., Respondents.

(Argued June 27,1883 ;

decided October 2,1883.)

*George W. Wingate*for appellant.

*A. J. Vanderpoel*for respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.