alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Rene Lerer, certify that:  1.I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Magellan Health Services, Inc.;  2.Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:  (a)Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such
control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  (b)Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ RENE LERERRene LererDate: April 30, 2009
  Chief Executive Officer  1
Presidential Documents

7787 

Federal Register 

Vol. 86, No. 20 

Tuesday, February 2, 2021 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of January 13, 2021 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 614(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of Title 3, 

United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State, subject 

to fulfilling the requirement of section 614(a)(3) of the Foreign Assistance 

Act of 1961 (FAA), the authority under section 614(a)(2) of the FAA to 

determine whether it is vital to the national security interests of the United 

States to make up to $6.8 million in sales of cluster munitions technology 

under the Arms Export Control Act to the Republic of Korea, without regard 

to any other provision of law within the purview of section 614(a)(2) of 

the FAA. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 13, 2021 

[FR Doc. 2021–02250 

2–1–21; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with MEMO_FRTrump.EPS</GPH>
#### 2822.1408 Contract clause.

The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 22.1408(a)(2).
#### 252.247-7025 Reflagging or repair work.

As prescribed in 247.574(c), use the following clause:

# Reflagging or Repair Work (JUN 2005)

(a) *Definition. Reflagging or repair work,* as used in this clause, means work performed on a vessel—

(1) To enable the vessel to meet applicable standards to become a vessel of the United States; or

(2) To convert the vessel to a more useful military configuration.

(b) *Requirement.* Unless the Secretary of Defense waives this requirement, reflagging or repair work shall be performed in the United States or its outlying areas, if the reflagging or repair work is performed—

(1) On a vessel for which the Contractor submitted an offer in response to the solicitation for this contract; and

(2) Prior to acceptance of the vessel by the Government.

(End of clause)

[60 FR 29503, June 5, 1995, as amended at 70 FR 35548, June 21, 2005; 72 FR 49206, Aug. 28, 2007; 84 FR 4371, Feb. 15, 2019]
“Get Alaska Moving through service and infrastructure.” 

## Department of Transportation and

Public Facilities

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER

P.O. Box 196900

Anchorage, Alaska 99519

- 6900

Main: 907.269.0730

F ax: 907.269.0489

May 30, 2013

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany

Chief, Essential Air Service Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Essential Air Service at Adak, Alaska ( ADK )

DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 200 0

- 8556

Dear Mr. DeVany,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the selection of an air carrier for Adak , Alaska. I

am writing to express my strong support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS)

program in Alaska and to emphasize the crucial access it provides to our remote communities.

Due to the isolated location of A dak , which located in the Aleutian Islands and so lacks any road

system connection, EAS subsidized air service is the community’s only form of scheduled

transportation. Adak depend s on scheduled air carrier service for freight, passenger, and mail

service for basic n ecessities, access to routine health services, and economic welfare.

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are generally best positioned to

com ment on particular schedules or air carriers, and therefore we think the community should

provide comments to you on those specific areas.

I respectfully urge US DOT to support and continue the EAS service for A dak , Alaska

.

Sincerely,
**FY 2012 Grantees for Discretionary Funding**

**Title III, Part A, American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Program**

**FY 2012 Grantees for Mandatory Funding**

**Title III, Part F, American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Program**

January 9, 2013
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 49 1 . J OSEPH W ADE, J R. v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 0 1

, J o sep h W ad e, J r. p l ed g u i l ty t o s t at u t o ry r a p e a n d o t h er cri m es

. He

n o w s e e k s d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew o f hi s ju d g m en t o f co n v i ct i o n an d s en t en ce. 1 N o

p ro v is i o n of OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) ap p l i es h ere, an d t h e o rd er t h at W ad e wi s h es to

ap p eal was d i rect l y ap p eal ab l e. Ord i n ari l y

, wh en a p art y ap p l i es fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew o f a d i rect l y ap p eal ab l e o rd er, we g ran t t h e ap p l i cat i o n un d er O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5

(j). T o fal l wi t hi n t h i s g en eral ru l e, h o wev er, t h e ap p l i cat i o n m u s t b e fi l ed w i t h i n 3 0

d a ys o f e n t r y o f t h e o rd er o r ju d g m en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ); Hi l l v

S t a t e

, 20 4 Ga. A p p

. 5 8 2 (4 2 0 SE2 d 3 9 3 ) (1 9 9 2 ). W ad e, h o wev er, fi l ed t h i s

ap p li cat io n 1 4 y ears aft er en t ry o f t h e ord er at i s s u e h ere. Acco rd in g l y

, t h e

ap p li cat io n i s u n t i m el y , an d i t i s t h erefo re DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 I n h i s p ro s e ap p l i cat i o n b ri ef, W ad e st at es t h at h e w is hes t o wi t h d raw h i s

g u i l t y p l ea. Bu t W ad e’ s ap pl i cat i o n m at eri al s d o n o t i n cl u d e a m o t i o n t o w i t h d raw,

n o r an ord er d en y i n g s u ch a m o t i o n. Th e o n ly o rd er t hat W ad e h as s u b m i t t ed i s h i s

2 0 0 1 fi n al d i s p o s i t i o n

. 07/23/2015 July 23, 2015
# C_2018310EN.01000301.xml

| 3.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

31 August 2018

(2018/C 310/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1651 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4558 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89740 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6205 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1281 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 124,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7148 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,735 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 326,25 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2913 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6437 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,6386 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6129 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5192 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1453 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7559 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5965 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 301,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1728 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9664 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 230,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7967 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,318 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 79,0967 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,175 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,8591 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,3628 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,7245 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1651

JPY

Japanese yen

129,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4558

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89740

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6205

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1281

ISK

Iceland króna

124,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7148

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,735

HUF

Hungarian forint

326,25

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2913

RON

Romanian leu

4,6437

TRY

Turkish lira

7,6386

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6129

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5192

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1453

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7559

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5965

KRW

South Korean won

1 301,91

ZAR

South African rand

17,1728

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9664

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 230,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7967

PHP

Philippine peso

62,318

RUB

Russian rouble

79,0967

THB

Thai baht

38,175

BRL

Brazilian real

4,8591

MXN

Mexican peso

22,3628

INR

Indian rupee

82,7245

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>   0000092487
<NAME>  SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<SUBSIDIARY>
<NUMBER> 003
<NAME> SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,829,799
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,121
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         147,273
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        18,139
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  90,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,091,424
<COMMON>                                       135,660
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      245,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            286,188
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 666,848
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,706
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           651,092
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              88,501
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   40,595
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 4,364
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 635,318
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,091,424
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      197,064
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             3,807
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     166,888
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     170,695
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         26,369
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 276
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  26,645
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        13,992
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,653
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         57
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   12,596
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        27,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        9,802
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          (4,081)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ E. James Collord By  __________________________________ E.  James Collord President, Director and Chief Executive Officer Date:  April 15, 2008
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:51 PM

To: 'dave@creativelawnetwork.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: iFLYcinema, LLC (Docket No. FAA-2015-0511)



### May 14, 2015

Dear Mr. Ratner:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0511). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, ro torcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

 Your petition references the material listed belo w, however the material was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM)

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by May 28, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 33-40397 and 33-44776 on Forms S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-125113 on Form S-1 of our report dated July 25, 2006 (January 29, 2007, as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 2 andsubsequent events described in Note 21), relating to the consolidated financial statements of Flow International Corporation (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement discussedin Note 2 and subsequent events described in Note 21), and our report dated July 25, 2006, January 29, 2007 as to the effects of the material weakness related to the control environment described in Management’s Report on InternalControl Over Financial Reporting ( as revised ) (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Flow International Corporation for theyear ended April 30, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

January 29, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                             EXHIBIT 11
 
                             CHATTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS 
                (Unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED     FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                          AUGUST 31,                    AUGUST 31,
                                                  --------------------------     -------------------------
                                                      1997           1996            1997         1996
                                                  -----------    ------------    -----------   -----------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>             <C>           <C>
NET INCOME:
  Continuing operations.......................    $2,847         $2,131          $6,040        $4,104
  Extraordinary loss..........................    (1,370)            --          (1,370)         (532)
                                                  -------        ------         --------       -------
    Net income................................    $1,477         $2,131         $ 4,670        $3,572
                                                  -------        ------         --------       -------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF 
  COMMON AND COMMON 
  EQUIVALENT SHARES 
  OUTSTANDING:
    Weighted average number of common 
      shares outstanding......................     8,882          8,582          8,700          7,874
    Shares issued upon assumed exercise of 
      outstanding stock options and stock 
      warrants................................       450            226            320             60
                                                  -------        ------         --------       -------

  Weighted average number of common 
    and common equivalent shares
    outstanding...............................     9,332         8,808           9,020          7,934
                                                  -------        ------         --------       -------

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE:
  Continuing operations.......................     $0.31         $0.24          $ 0.67         $ 0.52
  Extraordinary loss..........................     (0.15)           --           (0.15)         (0.07)
                                                  -------        ------         --------       -------

    Net income per common share...............     $0.16         $0.24          $ 0.52        $  0.45
                                                  -------        ------         --------       -------

</TABLE>
## Annual Performance Report

Grantees under this program are required to submit an annual performance report (APR) through the International Resource Information System (IRIS). The Department provides grantees with the required password and other information needed to access the IRIS system. IRIS also includes a publicly accessible searchable database of abstracts of projects funded under OPE's international education programs.



IFLE Home

|Last Modified: 05/31/2011
|-------------------------
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frank Gagliardi et al., Respondents, v. Turner Construction Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a portion of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Decedent was 19 years old when he died as a result of an industrial accident. A finding of dependency has been made both as to his father and mother. The dependency of the mother is sufficiently sustained by the record, but not that of the father: At the time of his death in November, 1960 decedent was earning $75 a week. Prior to June he had been earning $50 a week. When he earned $50 he contributed $25; and when he earned $75 he contributed $50 a week to the general family expenses. The total contributed in 1960 seems to have been about $1,800. During this period the father earned $6,053.74 and had other additions to his income which totalled $6,648. The household expenses were about $5,300, with an additional $1,048.74 for medical expenses. Besides these, there were payments on a mortgage and for reduction of the father’s indebtedness which brought the total to $8,233, so that the family unit, which consisted also of a younger sister, was in part dependent on decedent. *(Matter of Martorana*v. *Tensolite Insulated Wire Co.,*14 A D 2d 462.) But the father was not a dependent and would not, as an individual, be entitled to an award unless, in its absence, the general family standard would be reduced, *(Matter of Jardine*v. *Drahe-Crafe-Winston-Teeon-Conduit,*5 A D 2d 727.) No sufficient showing of this has been made. If the father’s award is disallowed, the mother’s award will increase from $25 to $30 a week (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 16, subd. 4). In some part the expenses for 1960 seem unusual, especially for medical care, and perhaps also in the amounts spent for the reduction of the father’s indebtedness. It may be possible also to regard the sister as a dependent, but, of course, that question is not before us. Award modified by reversing the award to the father and as thus modified affirmed, with costs to appellants.' Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.