Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 22 / Thursday, February 4, 2021 / Notices 8177 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

1The petitioners are Insteel Wire Products 

Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and 

WMC Steel, LLC (collectively, the petitioners). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

12200 (April 1, 2019). 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Prestressed Concrete 

Steel Wire Strand from Thailand: Petitioners’ 

Request for 2018 Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 28, 2019. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Prestressed Concrete Steel 

Wire Strand from Thailand: Extension of Deadline 

for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018,’’ dated September 24, 

2019. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2018 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: Prestressed Concrete 

Steel Wire Strand from Thailand,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

from Thailand, 69 FR 4111 (January 28, 2004) 

(Order); see also Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand from Brazil, India, Japan, the Republic of 

Korea, Mexico, and Thailand: Continuation of the 

Antidumping Duty Finding/Orders and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 22708 (April 23, 

2015). 

in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The 

domestic interested parties claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers, 

producers, or wholesalers of a domestic 

like product in the United States. On 

October 31, 2019, the domestic 

interested parties provided a complete 

substantive response for this review 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no 

substantive responses from any other 

interested parties, nor was a hearing 

requested. As a result, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is certain frozen fish fillets. For a full 

description of the scope, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the orders 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is hereby adopted 

by this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov, and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room B8024 of the main Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on fish fillets 

from Vietnam would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and that the magnitude of the margins 

is up to 63.88 percent. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to interested parties subject to 

an APO of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and terms 

of an APO is a violation which is subject 

to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Dated: January 29, 2021. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

VI. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–02347 Filed 2–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–820] 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand From Thailand: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that The 

Siam Industrial Wire Co., Ltd. (SIW) did 

not make sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR) January 1, 2018 

through December 31, 2018. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results of review. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Smith or Samantha Kinney, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1766 or 

(202) 482–2285, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 1, 2019, based on a timely 

request for review filed by the 

petitioners,1 we initiated an 

administrative review on prestressed 

concrete steel wire strand (PC Strand) 

from Thailand for SIW,2 the only 

company for which a review was 

requested.3 In September 2019, we 

extended the preliminary results of this 

review to no later than January 31, 

2020.4 For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.5

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order 6 is 

PC Strand from Thailand. Products 

subject to the order are currently 

classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

under item numbers 7312.10.3010 and 

7312.10.3012. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to this scope is dispositive. For 

a full description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
8178 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 22 / Thursday, February 4, 2021 / Notices 

7See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

8See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

9See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

12See 19 CFR 351.303. 

13See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

14See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

15See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

16See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

17See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

18For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

19See Order. 

and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Constructed export 

price is calculated in accordance with 

section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated 

in accordance with section 773 of the 

Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is available to the 

public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov, and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, room B8024 of the main 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.htm. 

The signed and electronic versions of 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that a 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

0.00 percent exists for SIW for the 

period January 1, 2018 through 

December 31, 2018.7

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice.8

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice.9

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than five days after the date for filing 

case briefs.10 Parties who submit case 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.11 Case and rebuttal briefs 

should be filed using ACCESS.12

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, filed electronically via 

ACCESS within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.13 Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

issues raised in the briefs. If a request 

for a hearing is made, Commerce 

intends to notify parties of the time and 

date for the hearing to be held at the 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230.14

An electronically-filed document 

must be received successfully in its 

entirety via ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern 

Time on the established deadline. 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any written briefs, not 

later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, unless 

otherwise extended.15

Assessment Rates 

Upon publication of the final results 

of this administrative review, Commerce 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review.16

If SIW’s calculated weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis 

(i.e., greater than or equal to 0.5 percent) 

in the final results of this review, we 

will calculate importer-specific 

assessment ad valorem rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

importer’s examined sales and the total 

entered value of the sales in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If SIW’s 

weighted-average dumping margin 

continues to be zero or de minimis, or 

the importer-specific assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of review, we intend to instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.17

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

In accordance with our ‘‘automatic 

assessment’’ practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by SIW for which SIW did not 

know that the merchandise it sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 

all-others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.18

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for SIW will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review, except if the rate 

is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, 

de minimis within the meaning of 19 

CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the 

cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific 

cash deposit rate published for the most 

recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the cash deposit rate established 

for the most recently completed segment 

of this proceeding for the producer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be 12.91 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.19 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 22 / Thursday, February 4, 2021 / Notices 8179 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 18479 

(May 1, 2019). 

2See US Magnesium LLC’s Letter, ‘‘Pure 

Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China: 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated May 31, 

2019. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

33739 (July 15, 2019). In the 2011–2012 

administrative review of the order, Commerce 

collapsed TMM and TMI, and treated the 

companies as a single entity for purposes of the 

proceeding. Because there were no changes to the 

facts which supported that decision since that 

determination was made, we continue to find that 

these companies are part of a single entity for this 

administrative review. See Pure Magnesium from 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– 

2012, 79 FR 94 (January 2, 2014) and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 5. 

4The meaning of this term is the same as that 

used by the American Society for Testing and 

Materials (ATSM) in its Annual Book for ASTM 

Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and 

Magnesium Alloys. 

5See TMI’s Letter, ‘‘Pure Magnesium from the 

People’s Republic of China, A–570–832; No 

Shipment Certification for Tianjin Magnesium 

International Co., Ltd.,’’ dated August 7, 2019; see 

also TMM’s Letter, ‘‘Pure Magnesium from the 

People’s Republic of China, A–570–832; No 

Shipment Certification for Tianjin Magnesium 

Metal Co., Ltd.,’’ dated August 7, 2019. 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, 

and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: January 29, 2021. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–02344 Filed 2–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–832] 

Pure Magnesium From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from the People’s Republic 

of China (China), covering the period 

May 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019. 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that Tianjin Magnesium International, 

Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Magnesium Metal, 

Co., Ltd. (collectively TMI/TMM) did 

not have reviewable entries during the 

period of review (POR). We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle 

Clahane, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5449. 

Background 

On May 1, 2019, Commerce published 

a notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from China for the POR.1

On July 15, 2019, in response to a timely 

request from the petitioner,2 and in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated 

an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from China with respect to 

TMI/TMM.3

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this 

antidumping duty order is pure 

magnesium from China, regardless of 

chemistry, form or size, unless expressly 

excluded from the scope of the order. 

Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy 

containing by weight primarily the 

element magnesium and produced by 

decomposing raw materials into 

magnesium metal. Pure primary 

magnesium is used primarily as a 

chemical in the aluminum alloying, 

desulfurization, and chemical reduction 

industries. In addition, pure magnesium 

is used as an input in producing 

magnesium alloy. Pure magnesium 

encompasses products (including, but 

not limited to, butt ends, stubs, crowns 

and crystals) with the following primary 

magnesium contents: 

(1) Products that contain at least 

99.95% primary magnesium, by weight 

(generally referred to as ‘‘ultra pure’’ 

magnesium) Magnesium Alloy’’ 4 and 

are thus outside the scope of the 

existing antidumping orders on 

magnesium from China (generally 

referred to as ‘‘alloy’’ magnesium). 

(2) Products that contain less than 

99.95%, but not less than 99.8%, 

primary magnesium, by weight 

(generally referred to as ‘‘pure’’ 

magnesium); and 

(3) Products that contain 50% or 

greater, but less than 99.8% primary 

magnesium, by weight, and that do not 

conform to ASTM specifications for 

alloy magnesium (generally referred to 

as ‘‘off–specification pure’’ magnesium). 

‘‘Off–specification pure’’ magnesium 

is pure primary magnesium containing 

magnesium scrap, secondary 

magnesium, oxidized magnesium or 

impurities (whether or not intentionally 

added) that cause the primary 

magnesium content to fall below 99.8% 

by weight. It generally does not contain, 

individually or in combination, 1.5% or 

more, by weight, of the following 

alloying elements: Aluminum, 

manganese, zinc, silicon, thorium, 

zirconium and rare earths. 

Excluded from the scope of the order 

are alloy primary magnesium (that 

meets specifications for alloy 

magnesium), primary magnesium 

anodes, granular primary magnesium 

(including turnings, chips and powder) 

having a maximum physical dimension 

(i.e., length or diameter) of one inch or 

less, secondary magnesium (which has 

pure primary magnesium content of less 

than 50% by weight), and remelted 

magnesium whose pure primary 

magnesium content is less than 50% by 

weight. 

Pure magnesium products covered by 

the order are currently classifiable 

under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 

8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.20.00, 

8104.30.00, 8104.90.00, 3824.90.11, 

3824.90.19 and 9817.00.90. Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description of the scope is 

dispositive. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

We received timely submissions from 

TMI/TMM certifying that they did not 

have sales, shipments, or exports of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR.5 On December 

20, 2019, we requested the U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) data file of 

entries of subject merchandise imported 

into the United States during the POR, 

and exported by TMI/TMM. This query 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES