alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(March 6, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Salvatore Gravano, Gary Gardine, Lawrence Macari, Alexander Cuomo and Peter Macari, Appellants.

On the court’s own motion the above-entitled decision dated February 20, 1979 [67 AD2d 988] is amended by adding to the last paragraph thereof after the first sentence the following: "The defen*896dants’ right to be on the premises searched by the police is not in question.” Order dated February 20, 1979 amended accordingly. O’Connor, J. P., Shapiro, Margett and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



         We have  issued our report  dated  January 14,  2000  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial  statements  included  in  the  1999  Annual  Report  to
Shareholders  which is  incorporated  by reference in the Annual Report of First
Colonial Group,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1999. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in
the  Registration  Statementsof  First Colonial Group,  Inc. and Subsidiaries on
Form S-3 (File No.  33-21126,  effective July 6, 1989) and on Form S-8 (File No.
33-84400, effective September 17, 1994).






/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 27, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 109 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 398
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 109

                          [Report No. 118-480]

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
 Exchange Commission relating to ``Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2024

 Mr. Flood (for himself and Mr. Nickel) submitted the following joint 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

                              May 1, 2024

         Additional sponsors: Mr. Emmer, Mr. Soto, and Mr. Hill

                              May 1, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
 Exchange Commission relating to ``Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to 
``Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121'' (87 Fed. Reg. 21015 (April 11, 
2022) and a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability Office 
dated October 31, 2023 (which was printed in the Congressional Record 
on November 1, 2023, on pages S5310-5312), concluding that such Staff 
Accounting Bulletin is a rule under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 
Code), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 398

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 109

                          [Report No. 118-480]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
 Exchange Commission relating to ``Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 1, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
3046.791-3 Warranties on Government-furnished property (USCG). A contractor for a major systems acquisition shall not be required to provide the warranties specified in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3046.790-1 on any property furnished to that contractor by the Government except for: ( a ) Defects in installation; and
( b ) Installation or modification in such a manner that invalidates a warranty provided by the manufacturer of the property.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         CHATTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    FEBRUARY 28,
                                                           ----------------------------
                                                               1999               1998
                                                               ----               ----
<S>                                                        <C>                   <C>
NET INCOME:
   Income before extraordinary loss ............           $  3,577              $   609
   Extraordinary loss ..........................               (427)                  --
                                                           --------              -------
     Net income ................................           $  3,150              $   609
                                                           --------              -------
                                                           --------              -------
COMMON SHARES:
   Weighted average number outstanding..........              9,712                9,087
   Number issued upon assumed exercise
     of outstanding stock options and stock
     warrants...................................                406                  394
                                                           --------              -------
   Weighted average number and dilutive
    potential number outstanding ...............             10,118                9,481
                                                           --------              -------
                                                           --------              -------
NET INCOME ( LOSS) PER COMMON
 SHARE:
    Basic:
      Income before extraordinary loss .........           $    .37              $   .07
      Extraordinary loss .......................               (.04)                  --
                                                           --------              -------
          Total basic ..........................           $    .33              $   .07
                                                           --------              -------
    Diluted:                                               --------              -------
      Income before extraordinary loss .........           $    .35              $   .06
      Extraordinary loss .......................               (.04)                  --
                                                           --------              -------
          Total diluted ........................           $    .31              $   .06
                                                           --------              -------
                                                           --------              -------
</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-772]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Sterling Pharma USA LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before April 6, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before April 6, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on January 5, 2021, Sterling Pharma USA, LLC., 1001 Sheldon Drive, Suite 101, Cary, North Carolina 27513-2078, applied to be registered as an bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug
                             code
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols
7370
I
 The company plans to manufacture in bulk drug code 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols) exclusively from hemp extract, for distribution and sale to its customers. No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-02455 Filed 2-4-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
#### Isaiah D. Kearse, Petitioner, v Harold Fisher, Individually and as Chairman of the New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Transit Authority, dated June 16, 1977, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petitioner from his position as a railroad clerk. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision that the respondent is to hold a hearing on the issue of back pay, if any, due petitioner. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs or disbursements and petition is otherwise dismissed on the merits. The petitioner was suspended from his position as a railroad clerk on August 18, 1976 and was dismissed on June 16, 1977. Even though the petitioner was dismissed from service, he is entitled, under subdivision 3 of section 75 of the Civil Service Law, to back pay for the period in excess of the initial 30 days after his suspension, less such sums as may have been earned from other employments during the subject period. However, the petitioner may only recover wages to the extent that any delay beyond the 30-day period is not attributable to him (see *Matter of Yeampierre v Gutman,*52 AD2d 608). Therefore, a hearing to determine the amount of back pay, if any, owed the petitioner is required. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
#### 245.101 Definitions.

*Mapping, charting, and geodesy property,* as used in this subpart, is defined in the clause at 252.245-7000, Government-Furnished Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy Property.
#### 252.229-7010 Relief from customs duty on fuel (United Kingdom).

As prescribed in 229.402-70(j), use the following clause:

# Relief from Customs Duty on Fuel (United Kingdom) (JUN 1997)

(a) Pursuant to an agreement between the United States Government and Her Majesty's (HM) Customs and Excise, it is possible to obtain relief from customs duty on fuels and lubricants used in support of certain contracts. If vehicle fuels and lubricants are used in support of this contract, the Contractor shall seek relief from customs duty in accordance with HM Customs Notice No. 431, February 1973, entitled “Relief from Customs Duty and/or Value Added Tax on United States Government Expenditures in the United Kingdom.” Application should be sent to the Contractor's local Customs and Excise Office.

(b) Specific information should be included in the request for tax relief, such as the number of vehicles involved, types of vehicles, rating of vehicles, fuel consumption, estimated mileage per contract period, and any other information that will assist HM Customs and Excise in determining the amount of relief to be granted.

(c) Within 30 days after the award of this contract, the Contractor shall provide the Contracting Officer with evidence that an attempt to obtain such relief has been initiated. In the event the Contractor does not attempt to obtain relief within the time specified, the Contracting Officer may deduct from the contract price the amount of relief that would have been allowed if HM Customs and Excise had favorably considered the request for relief.

(d) The amount of any rebate granted by HM Customs and Excise shall be paid in full to the United States Government. Checks shall be made payable to the Treasurer of the United States and forwarded to the Administrative Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[62 FR 34134, June 24, 1997]
#### 250.103-6 Disposition.

For requests denied or approved below the Secretarial level, follow the disposition procedures at PGI 250.103-6.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                               | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Vocational and Adult Education Home |
|                                               |

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### In the Matter of Dorothy Rizzo, Respondent, v. Newton P. Rizzo, Appellant.

Motion granted postponing argument of appeal to January 1961 Term.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

The Higher Education Act requires that the Secretary consult with federal agency heads in order to receive recommendations regarding areas of national need for expertise in foreign languages and world regions.

Areas of national need identified by the Secretary, consisting of priority languages that are less commonly taught and the world regions - Consultation with Federal Agencies on Areas of National Need

## Legislation

                - Title       VI, Part B of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended
                - 20       USC  Section       1130-1  and  Sections       1132-1137 

## Regulations

                - There are no program-specific regulations.
                - Education Department's General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) Parts 75, 76, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99
                - The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485.
                - The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474.

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
EXHIBIT 12.2

              CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
        RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
               AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
       FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
                  (Thousands Except Ratio)
                        (Unaudited)


Operating Income                                                $279,332

Adjustments:
  Federal income taxes                                            60,792
  Provision for deferred Federal income taxes                    (42,955)
  Deferred investment tax credits                                 (5,789)
  Other income and deductions                                     12,695
  Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
    used during construction                                       5,447
  Mirror CWIP amortization                                        47,750

        Earnings                                                $357,272


Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                                    $117,385
  Interest on short-term debt and other                           18,487
  Preferred stock dividend requirements                           15,038

        Fixed Charges and Preferred Requirements                $150,910


Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
  and Preferred Stock Dividends                                     2.37
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,059,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,380,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,439,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,439,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          527,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,350,384
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,561,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,439,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               346,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               207,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                139,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            139,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   139,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
#### Turner *et al. v.*The State.

March 11, 1913.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge J. B. Park. Morgan superior court. November 22, 1912.

*MiddlebrooTcs & Burruss*and *Williford*<£• *Lambert,*for plaintiffs in error. ■ *Thomas 8. Felder, attorney-general,*and *Joseph F. 'Pottle, solicitor-general,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

1. In the absence of a proper .written request, it is not cause for new trial that the court failed to instruct the jury upon the rule of law respecting the credibility of witnesses. *Lewis*v. *State,*125 *Ga.*48 (53 S. E. 816); *Lewis*v. *State,*129 *Ga.*731 (59 S. E. 782).

2. The court charged the jury on the subject of their duty to acquit the defendants, or such of them as to whom the evidence failed to show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, as clearly and distinctly as was stated in the written request. Where the court has fairly and fully instructed the jury on a given subject, it is not error to deny requests to charge on that subject, varying from the charge only in the mode of expression, and not in substance. *Perdue*v. *State,*126 *Ga.*112 (54 S. E. 820).

3. It was not error to give the following charge: “I charge you in this connection that where a homicide is shown to have been committed, the law presumes that the homicide was malicious,’ and it devolves on the defendant to show justification or mitigation or excuse unless the evidence adduced against him shows such justification or mitigation or excuse, or unless the circumstances connected with the homicide, if a homicide is shown to have been committed, show justification or mitigation or excuse.” *Mann*v. *State,*124 *Ga.*760 (53 S. E. 324, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 934).

4. The evidence was sufficient to show concert of action with the actual slayer, who was jointly tried with the plaintiffs in error, and that the homicide was murder. The court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed,.*

*Beeh, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*