alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|November 5, 2008
## Legislation

- Title VIII, Section 873 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1161t download filesMS Word (29K) | PDF (12K)

## Regulations

- There are no program-specific regulations.
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98 and 99. Note:  The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of higher education only.

FIPSE Home

|Last Modified: 04/27/2010
|-------------------------
#### George Lessler, Appellant, v Suffolk Chapter Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered August 30, 1977, which (1) granted the cross motion of the respondent County of Suffolk "to dismiss and to dismiss because of objections in point of law and for summary judgment” and (2) dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, the allegations made by petitioner do not amount to a showing of "fraud or of other impropriety undermining the caliber of representation afforded members” of the Deputy Sheriffs’ unit in the pending arbitration (see *Matter of Russell v Patterson,*55 AD2d 619; see, also, *Matter of Jacobs v Board of Educ.,*64 AD2d 148). Further, it is apparent that petitioner’s problems stem from the composition of the bargaining unit. The Deputy Sheriffs’ efforts in other proceedings, and before another forum (the Suffolk County Public Employment Relations Board) to obtain decertification from the Suffolk Chapter of the Civil Service Employees Association and to certify the Suffolk County Deputy Sheriffs’ Benevolent Association, have been unsuccessful to date. The present proceeding to stay arbitration is not the vehicle to relitigate, review or undermine determinations of the Public Employment Relations Board which are adverse to petitioner. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
# C_2018012EN.01001901.xml

| 13.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/19

---

Call for proposals for the establishment of Knowledge and Innovation Communities of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)

(2018/C 12/10)

In conformity with Regulation (EU) No 1292/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals for Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs).

1

Proposals are invited for the following call. The call deadline and all relevant information are given in the call text, which is published on the EIT website.

Call Identifier: EIT-KICS-2018.

EIT-KICS-2018

Priority areas addressed by the call: EIT Urban Mobility (smart, green and integrated transport), and EIT Manufacturing (added-value manufacturing).

Information on the modalities of the call, the evaluation criteria and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the KICs Call page of the EIT website: http://eit.europa.eu/collaborate/2018-call-for-kics

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 174.

1

---
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                                               
|Paul R. Flanders Vice President  Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer May 7, 2008
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2018466EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/18 |

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 466/09)

![Image](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/uriserv/OJ.C_.2018.466.01.0018.01.ENG.xhtml.C_2018466EN.01001802.tif.jpg)

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Spain

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins [(1)](#ntr1-C_2018466EN.01001801-E0001). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2018466EN.01001801-E0002), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country
: Spain

Subject of commemoration
: Unesco’s World Cultural and Natural Heritage Sites — the old town of Avila and its churches outside the walls

Description of the design
: The city of Avila has preserved the auterity and purity of the mediaeval style, surrounded by the most complete walls of Spain.

The design reproduces at the centre a detail of the Avila wall. At the top side circular ascending the word ‘ESPANA’, the year of issuance ‘2019’ and the mint mark.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
:

1 000 000

Date of issue
: First quarter 2019

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2018466EN.01001801-E0001)  See [OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2001_373_R_TOC) for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2018466EN.01001801-E0002)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation ([OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2009_009_R_TOC)).

---
## FY 2023

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $83,716,619Number of Awards: 264Average Award: $317,108

## FY 2022

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $82,274,847 Number of Awards: 301 Average Award: $273,338 

## FY 2021

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $51,423,037 Number of Awards: 327Average Award: $157,257

## FY 2020

Funding Allocation for  CCAMPIS grants: $45,648,300  Number of Awards: 287Average Award: $159,053

## FY 2019

Funding Allocation for  CCAMPIS grants: $42,301,403  Number of Awards: 266Average Award: $159,028

## FY 2018

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $33,323,408Number of Awards: 196 Average Award:  $170,017

## FY 2017

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $14,982,678Number of Awards:  86Average Award:  $174,217

## FY 2016

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $15,447,403Number of Awards:  85Average Award:  $181,734

## FY 2015

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $14,820,597Number of Awards:  85Average Award:  $174,360

## FY 2014

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $15,134,000Number of Awards:  86Average Award:  $175,977

## FY 2013

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $14,894,566Number of Awards:  113Average Award:  $131,810

## FY 2012

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $15,969,760Number of Awards:  153Average Award:  $104,378

## FY 2011

Funding Allocation for CCAMPIS grants: $16,001,931Number of Awards:  153Average Award:  $104,588

Student Service Home
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS - FORMER

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-86016, 333-95149 and 33-32504) pertaining to the MPSI Systems
Inc. 1988 Stock Option Plan, the MPSI Systems Inc. 1998 Stock Plan and the MPSI
Systems Inc. Matching Investment Plan of our report dated February 25, 2002,
with respect to the September 30, 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial
statements and schedule of MPSI Systems Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 14, 2003
#### (A) In the Matter of Regina E. Martucci v. Board of Trustees of the New York Fire Department Pension Fund. (B) In the Matter of William Schneider v. Statmaster Corporation. (C) Anthony Acompora v. Willie Mays et al.

[In each action] Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of the
Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, I, David
F. White, Controller of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.


                                        /S/ David F. White
                                            Controller (chief financial officer
                                             and principal accounting officer)
NO. 07

- 11

- 00302

- CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO
PANEL A JANUARY 13 , 2012

JOSH CORONADO, APPELLANT

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY; NO. 2010

- 0 0 327; HONORABLE TOM SIMONS, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL Appellant Josh Coronado appeals his conviction and sentence for the offense of assault

- family violence. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record were due for filing in
th is court by November 16, 2011. Neither was filed.
On November 15, the reporter filed a request for additional time to file the reporter’s record on the grounds that appellant had not designated the record and had not paid or made arrangements to pay for i t. By letter, we directed appellant’s counsel to file a written notice within ten days indicating he had designated the reporter’s record2

and appellant had made acceptable payment arrangements for its preparation. The notice was not filed.

Then on Decemb er 14, the trial court clerk requested an extension of time for filing the clerk’s record, advising us appellant had not paid or made arrangement s to pay for the clerk’s record. By letter of that day, we ordered appellant to pay for the clerk’s record and reporter’s record within ten days. We also admonished the parties that if appellant’s counsel had not advised us in writing within fifteen days that acceptable payment arrangements for the preparation of the clerk’s record were made, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). The period lapsed without further communication from appellant.
Appellate Rule 37.3(b) authorizes dismissal of a criminal case for want of prosecution if no clerk’s record is filed due to the a ppellant’s fault, provided the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs and has a reasonable opportunity to cure the omission before dismissal. Here the information form filed in this court by the clerk of the trial court states that appellant was not declared unable to pay costs on appeal and his attorney is retained. Appellant received notice of his omission and a reasonable opportunity to cure, but he did not respond. This appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. Te x. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam Do not publish.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T LA U RA T. W I LLI A M S, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. L O S A N G E L E S J O B C O R P S ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 55015 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 1 -cv -0 0 8 9 7 -S JO -P JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y14, 2013 ** B ef ore: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , and M U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L aur aT . W i l l i a m s appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt d is m is s in g h e re m p lo y m e n t a c tio n a lle g in g v io la tio n s o f f e d e r a l an ds ta te law . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . P areto v. F D IC , 1 3 9 F. 3 d6 9 6 , 6 9 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 8 ) . W e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED MA Y22 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 55015 2 T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d W i l l i a m s ’ s a c t i on a l l e gi ng br e a c h of c ontr a c t , ha r a s s m e nt , di s c r i m i na t i on, de f am a t i on, a nd w r ongf

ul t e rm i na t i on b e c au s e W illia m s a lle g e ds o f e w f a c ts th a t th e c o u rt c o u ldin f e ro n lyth e p o s s ib ility o f m is c o n du c t. Se e A s hc r of t v . I qbal , 55 6 U . S . 66 2, 67 8 (20 09 ) ( t o survi ve a m ot i on t o di s m i s s , apl a i nt i f f m us ta l l e ge f

a c t s tha t“ a l l ow [ ] the c ourtt o dr a w the re as on abl e i nfer ence thatthe defendanti s l i abl e f or the m i sc on du ctal l eged”); P a r e to , 13 9 F . 3d at69 9 (“ [C ] on cl usory a l l egat i on s of l aw and u nw arrant ed in f e r e n c e s a r e n o t s u f

f ic ie n t to d e f

e a t am o tio n to d is m is s .” ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng W i l l i a m s ’ s m ot i on fo r d efau l tj u d g m en tb ecau se d efen d an t s p ro m p t l y re-fi l edth ei r m o t i o n t o d i sm i ss w ith o u t th e o r ig in a l c le r ic a l e rr o ra n dth e d e layd idn o t p r e ju d ic e W illia m s . See E i te l v . Mc C ool , 782 F . 2d 1470, 1471- 72 ( 9th C i r . 1986) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t a nda r d of r e v ie w a n df

a c to r s th e c o u rt m a yc o n s id e rin d e c id in g w h e th e rto e n te rd e f au lt ju d g m e n t u n d e rF e d . R . C iv . P . 5 5 ) . W illia m s ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt tr e a te dh e ru n f a ir lyis u n s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . AF F I RME D.
**Certification      of Chief Financial Officer **

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | **•** |   | fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **•** |   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |       |                                                                                                  |
|--------|--------|--------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |       |  /s/                C. Troy Woodbury, Jr.                                                        |
|   |   |   |       |                                                                                                  |
|   |   |   | **Name:**  | **C.                Troy Woodbury, Jr.**                                                              |
|   |   |   | **Title:** | **Treasurer                and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial                Officer)** |
|   |   |   | **Date:**  | **January                10, 2006**                                                                   |

----
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2023

Number of new awards: 3 Average award size: $1,449,626 Total funding:  $4,348,879

## FY 2022

Number of new awards: 12Average award: $1,563,182Total new awards funded: $18,758,194 

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov