alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Caleb D. Dorr *vs.*Phineas McDonald.

June 11, 1890.

Unlawful Detainer — Sufficiency of Complaint. — The complaint *held*good as against an objection raised for the first time in this court, on appeal from the judgment.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis.

*W. H. Donahue*and *Orville Rinehart,*for appellant.

*Laybourn & McHugh,*for respondent.

Mitchell, J.

In an action for unlawful detainer, plaintiff’s counsel drew a very poor complaint. But the defendant, without objection to it, joined issue and went to trial on the merits, and, being defeated, on appeal from the judgment, now, for the first time, raises an objection to the sufficiency of the complaint. In the absence of a case or bill of exceptions, we will presume that defendant voluntarily consented to the trial of all the issues involved in the verdict that plaintiff was entitled to the possession of the premises. As against an objection interposed at this stage of the proceedings, the *459complaint should be held sufficient. Within the rule of *Smith*v. *Dennett,*15 Minn. 59, (81,) we think that it is fairly inferable by reasonable intendment from what is alleged that, while the original letting was for only a month, the defendant continued in the occupancy of the premises as tenant from month to month. Indeed, if it was necessary, in order to sustain the judgment, we would be justified, under the circumstances, in directing the court below to permit the complaint to be amended so as to conform to the facts proved.

Judgment affirmed.
----

EXHIBIT 23.1

 

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

            We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements pertaining to the 1991 Employee Stock Plan, the 1999 Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, and the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37072) related to resales of common shares deliverable upon the exchange of Liquid Yield Option Notes, and in the related Prospectuses, of Genentech, Inc. of our report dated January 13, 2004, except for the second paragraph of the note titled Subsequent Events and the twenty-first paragraph of the note titled Leases, Commitments and Contingencies, as to which the date is February 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Genentech, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
1401.405 Deviations pertaining to treaties and executive agreements. ( a ) The Director, PAM, is responsible for transmitting to the FAR Secretariat the information required in FAR 1.405(d).
( b ) For deviations not authorized by FAR 1.405(b) or (c), the Director, PAM, shall process the request for deviation through the FAR Secretariat.
( c ) Deviations authorized or requested under paragraph (d) or (e) of this section shall be submitted by the HCA to the Director, PAM for further action.
# C_2019187EN.01000101.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 187/01)

Last publication

OJ C 182, 27.5.2019

Past publications

OJ C 172, 20.5.2019

OJ C 164, 13.5.2019

OJ C 155, 6.5.2019

OJ C 148, 29.4.2019

OJ C 139, 15.4.2019

OJ C 131, 8.4.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2019103EN.01000201.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/2

---

DECISION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

of 12 February 2019

on official holidays and judicial vacations

(2019/C 103/02)

THE COURT

having regard to Article 24(2), (4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure,

whereas it is necessary, in accordance with that provision, to establish the list of official holidays and to set the dates of the judicial vacations,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The list of official holidays within the meaning of Article 24(4) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure is established as follows:

| — | New Year’s Day, |
| --- | --- |

—

New Year’s Day,

| — | Easter Monday, |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter Monday,

| — | 1 May, |
| --- | --- |

—

1 May,

| — | Ascension, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ascension,

| — | Whit Monday, |
| --- | --- |

—

Whit Monday,

| — | 23 June, |
| --- | --- |

—

23 June,

| — | 15 August, |
| --- | --- |

—

15 August,

| — | 1 November, |
| --- | --- |

—

1 November,

| — | 25 December, |
| --- | --- |

—

25 December,

| — | 26 December. |
| --- | --- |

—

26 December.

Article 2

For the period from 1 November 2019 to 31 October 2020, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 24(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:

| — | Christmas 2019: from Monday 23 December 2019 to Sunday 12 January 2020 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Christmas 2019: from Monday 23 December 2019 to Sunday 12 January 2020 inclusive,

| — | Easter 2020: from Monday 6 April 2020 to Sunday 19 April 2020 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter 2020: from Monday 6 April 2020 to Sunday 19 April 2020 inclusive,

| — | Summer 2020: from Thursday 16 July 2020 to Monday 31 August 2020 inclusive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Summer 2020: from Thursday 16 July 2020 to Monday 31 August 2020 inclusive.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Luxembourg, 12 February 2019.

A. CALOT ESCOBAR

Registrar

K. LENAERTS

President

---
AO 450(Rev. 5/85)Judgment in a Civil Case

United States District Court

Northern District of Illinois

Eastern Division

Cheryl Gursel JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v. Case Number: 12 C 5326

Chicago Transit Authority

G Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury rendered its verdict.

O Decision by Court. This action came to before the Court. The issues have been tried

or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is dismissed with prejudice,

plaintiff having failed to comply with the court’s order dated 9/28/2012.

Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

Date: 12/28/2012 ________________________________

/s/ Wanda A. Parker, Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:12-cv-05326 Document #: 7 Filed: 12/28/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:14
#### 3047.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

The Higher Education Act requires that the Secretary consult with federal agency heads in order to receive recommendations regarding areas of national need for expertise in foreign languages and world regions.

Areas of national need identified by the Secretary, consisting of priority languages that are less commonly taught and the world regions - Consultation with Federal Agencies on Areas of National Need

## Legislation

                - Title VI, Part A, Section 602(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended  
                - 20 USC  Section 1122  and  Sections 1132-1137

## Regulations

                - 34 CFR  655  and  657
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR), Parts 75, 76, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99
                - The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485.
                - The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474.

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### M. E. Wolfsohn, appellee, v. Max Rothschild, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,671.

Action upon promissory notes. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon John J. Lupe, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed with findings of fact.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

Brown, Fox & Blumberg, for appellant; Jacob Logan Fox, of counsel.

Wolfsohn & Fireman and Cohon & Goldstein, for appellee; Samuel S. Cohon and Irving S. Goldstein, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-05-1996
<CASH>                                          31,057
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  371,094<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,753<F3>
<INVENTORY>                                    513,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,056,525
<PP&E>                                       1,622,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                 600,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,386,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          629,832
<BONDS>                                        781,104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       320,819
<OTHER-SE>                                     278,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,386,398
<SALES>                                      2,949,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,949,215
<CGS>                                        2,486,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,486,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                142,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.93
<FN>
<F1>The Company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. 
Fiscal year 1996 consists of 52 weeks and ends on December 28, 1996. 
All quarters in 1996 have 12 weeks, except the third quarter of 1996 which 
has 16 weeks.
<F2>Includes trade receivables only.
<F3>Includes amounts related to trade receivables and current notes receivable.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### 252.225-7023 Preference for Products or Services from Afghanistan.

As prescribed in 225.7703-*4*(a), use the following provision:

# Preference for Products or Services From Afghanistan (SEP 2013)

(a) *Definitions.* “Product from Afghanistan” and “service from Afghanistan,” as used in this provision, are defined in the clause of this solicitation entitled “Requirement for Products or Services from Afghanistan” (DFARS 252.225-7024).

(b) *Representation.* The offeror represents that all products or services to be delivered under a contract resulting from this solicitation are products from Afghanistan or services from Afghanistan, except those listed in—

(1) Paragraph (c) of this provision; or

(2) Paragraph (c)(2) of the provision entitled “Trade Agreements Certificate,” if included in this solicitation.

(c) *Other products or services.* The following offered products or services are not products from Afghanistan or services from Afghanistan:

(*Line Item Number*) (*Country of Origin*)

(d) *Evaluation.* For the purpose of evaluating competitive offers, the Contracting Officer will increase by 50 percent the prices of offers of products or services that are not products or services from Afghanistan.

(End of provision)

[78 FR 59859, Sept. 30, 2013]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 509 

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 

on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2018 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the 

Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint Committee 

of Congress on the Library. 

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and 

2 they are hereby, elected members of the following joint 

3 committees of Congress: 

4 JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING: Mr. Blunt, Mr. 

5 Roberts, Mr. Wicker, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Udall. 

6 JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY: 

7 Mr. Blunt, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Shelby, Ms. Klobuchar, and 

8 Mr. Leahy. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132620 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132620 COA: 260761 Ingham CC: 03-000461-FC AARON DANIEL CANTLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 12, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0319 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2007

Clerk
- NAME:
      - **Tina Diamond**
      - MAIL:
      - U.S. Department of Education, OSERS400 Maryland Ave., SW, 5th Floor, PCPWashington, DC 20202-2600
      - EMAIL:
      - Christina.Diamond@ed.gov
      - PHONE: 
      - 202-245-6723
      - TDD:
      - If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
## Legislation

- Title III, Part A, Sec 319 of the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, as amended  
- Title III, Part F, Sec 371 of the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, as amended 

## Regulations

- There are no program-specific regulations for this program.
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

Institutional Service Home
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Earl L. Yager, Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge: (1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. /s/ Earl L. YagerEarl L. YagerChief Executive OfficerJune 27, 2005
301.103 Authority. ( b ) The Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources (ASFR) prescribes the HHSAR under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and section 205(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 121(c)(2)), as delegated by the Secretary).
( c ) The HHSAR is issued in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as chapter 3 of title 48, Department of Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation. It may be referenced as “48 CFR chapter 3.”
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul R. Flanders                                  
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|May 12, 2004
For press releases on this and other IFLE programs, go to the IFLE Press Releases page.

## FY 2023

- List of Grantees and Abstracts:   MS Word  (1MB) 
- Google Map of FY 2023 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2022

- List of Grantees and Abstracts:   PDF  (580K)
- Google Map of FY 2022 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2021

- List of Grantees and Abstracts:   PDF  (654K)

## FY 2020

- List of Grantees and Abstracts:   PDF  (685K)

## FY 2019

- List of Grantees and Funding Amounts:   PDF  (141K)

## FY 2018

- List of Grantees and Funding Amounts:   PDF  (126K)

## FY 2017

List of grantees by  world area and project abstracts for Short- and Long-Term Group Projects Abroad

- Google  Map of IFLE FY 2017 Grantees

## FY 2016
List of grantees by world area and project abstracts for Short- and Long-Term Group Projects Abroad
-   MS Word  (540K)
- Google Map of IFLE FY 2016 Grantees
FY 2015
List of grantees by world area and project abstracts for Short-Term Group Projects Abroad
-   MS Word  (994K)
- Google Map of IFLE FY 2015 Grantees
FY 2014
List of grantees by world area and project abstracts for Short-Term Group Projects Abroad
-   MS Word  (973K)

IFLE Home
  Last Modified: 11/15/2023
# Draft Slate_Recommended

FY 2018 GAANN Program SlateNew Awards by Area	Attachment A

# Areas Together

# Sheet1

# FY 19  New Awards

Fiscal Year 2018 GAANN Rank Order Slate
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2017 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 22, 2017



By:

/s/    Kohei
TakeuchiName:

Kohei TakeuchiTitle:

Senior Managing Director Chief Financial Officer Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
27.202-5 Solicitation provisions and contract clause. ( a ) ( 1 ) Insert a solicitation provision substantially the same as the provision at 52.227-6, Royalty Information, in— ( i ) Any solicitation that may result in a negotiated contract for which royalty information is desired and for which certified cost or pricing data are obtained under 15.403; or
( ii ) Sealed bid solicitations only if the need for such information is approved at a level above the contracting officer as being necessary for proper protection of the Government's interests.
( 2 ) If the solicitation is for communication services and facilities by a common carrier, use the provision with its Alternate I.
( b ) If the Government is obligated to pay a royalty on a patent involved in the prospective contract, insert in the solicitation a provision substantially the same as the provision at 52.227-7, Patents—Notice of Government Licensee. If the clause at 52.227-6 is not included in the solicitation, the contracting officer may require offerors to provide information sufficient to provide this notice to the other offerors.
( c ) Insert the clause at 52.227-9, Refund of Royalties, in negotiated fixed-price solicitations and contracts when royalties may be paid under the contract. If a fixed-price incentive contract is contemplated, change “price” to “target cost and target profit” wherever it appears in the clause. The clause may be used in cost-reimbursement contracts where agency approval of royalties is necessary to protect the Government's interests.
[72 FR 63049, Nov. 7, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 53149, Aug. 30, 2010]
#### 2805.202 Exceptions.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of the determination required by FAR 5.202(b).
Appeal No. 74-110.

#### City of Pawtucket *v.*Robert Forsyth, Jr.

*Gerald J. Pouliot,*Asst. City Solicitor, for appellant. *Nugent & Nugent, J. Joseph Nugent, Jr.,*for appellee.

Motion of appellee, Robert Forsyth, Jr., to dismiss appeal granted.