Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 19 / Friday, January 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules 4759 

(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 

Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 

80202–1129. 

• Hand Delivery: Director, Air 

Program, Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P– 

AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries 

are only accepted Monday through 

Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. Special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Please see the direct final rule which is 

located in the Rules Section of this 

Federal Register for detailed instruction 

on how to submit comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kathy Dolan, Air Program, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 

Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 

80202–1129, 303–312–6142, 

dolan.kathy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this 

Federal Register, EPA is approving the 

State’s SIP revisions as a direct final 

rule without prior proposal because the 

Agency views these noncontroversial 

SIP revisions and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the preamble to 

the direct final rule. If EPA receives no 

adverse comments, EPA will not take 

further action on this proposed rule. If 

EPA receives adverse comments, EPA 

will withdraw the direct final rule and 

it will not take effect. EPA will address 

all public comments in a subsequent 

final rule based on this proposed rule. 

EPA will not institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. Please note that if 

EPA receives adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. See the information 

provided in the Direct Final action of 

the same title which is located in the 

Rules and Regulations Section of this 

Federal Register. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: January 5, 2010. 

Carol Rushin, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. 2010–1746 Filed 1–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2007–0122; FRL–9107–7] 

Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Revising 

the California State Implementation 

Plan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air 

Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: On February 20, 2008 (73 FR 

9260), EPA published a rule proposing 

to correct EPA’s May 2004 final 

approval of revisions to the San Joaquin 

Valley Unified Air Pollution Control 

District portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) and to 

approve revisions to certain District 

rules. EPA’s proposed correction, and 

proposed approval of District rules 

submitted in December 2006, would 

conform the SIP to a State law generally 

known as Senate Bill 700 by explicitly 

exempting certain minor agricultural 

sources from new source review 

permitting requirements and by limiting 

the applicability of offset requirements 

for all minor agricultural sources 

consistent with criteria identified in 

state law. EPA is withdrawing this 

previously published proposed rule, 

and in this Federal Register, EPA is 

publishing a proposed rule that replaces 

the February 20, 2008 proposed rule. 

DATES: The proposed rule published on 

February 20, 2008 (73 FR 9260) is 

withdrawn as of January 29, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laura Yannayon, Permits Office (AIR– 

3), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region IX, (415) 972–3534, 

yannayon.laura@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

On February 20, 2008 (73 FR 9260), 

EPA proposed to correct our May 2004 

final approval of revisions to the San 

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution 

Control District (‘‘District’’) portion of 

the California State Implementation 

Plan (‘‘SIP’’). EPA also proposed to 

approve revisions to two District rules 

submitted to EPA by the California Air 

Resources Board (CARB) on December 

29, 2006. The subject rules included 

District Rule 2020 and District Rule 

2201 (paragraph 4.6.9 only). The 

proposed correction and proposed 

approval that were the subject of our 

February 20, 2008 proposed rule relate 

to review and permitting of new or 

modified stationary sources (‘‘NSR’’) 

specifically in connection with 

agricultural sources. EPA received 

substantive comments on the February 

2008 proposed rule, and, since 

publication of the February 2008 

proposed rule, the District has adopted 

revisions to Rules 2020 and 2201, and 

CARB has submitted the amended rules 

in their entirety to EPA as revisions to 

the California SIP. In light of the 

comments on our February 2008 

proposed rule, and the more recent 

submittals of District Rules 2020 and 

2201, we have decided to withdraw the 

rule proposed on February 20, 2008, and 

in this Federal Register, EPA is 

publishing a new proposed rule. The 

rule being proposed in this Federal 

Register replaces the following rule 

published on February 20, 2008: 

Title: Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, San Joaquin 

Valley Unified Air Pollution Control 

District (Proposed rule, 73 FR 9260, 

EPA–R09–OAR–2007–0122). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 21, 2010. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2010–1840 Filed 1–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 761 

[EPA–HQ–RCRA–2008–0123; FRL–9108–1] 

RIN 2050–AG42 

Polychlorinated Biphenyls: 

Manufacturing (Import) Exemption for 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: On November 14, 2006, 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC, 

(Veolia) submitted a rulemaking petition 

to the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) requesting to import up to 

20,000 tons of polychlorinated biphenyl 

(PCB) waste from Mexico for disposal at 

Veolia’s TSCA-approved facility in Port 

Arthur, Texas. Based on the information 

available at that time, EPA proposed to 

grant Veolia’s request in the proposed 

rule, Polychlorinated Biphenyls: 

Manufacturing (Import) Exemption for 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC. 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS