alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130730 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan NORMA KAKISH and RAJAIE KAKISH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130730 COA: 260963 Ingham CC: 04-000809-NI DOMINION OF CANADA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issues whether the Ingh am Circuit Court could exercise ancillary jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claim for uninsured/unidentified motorist benefits and whether the applicable insurance contract requi red plaintiffs to bri ng any lawsuit in an Ontario court.

C AVANAGH
, J., not participating.

p0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
Appeal No. 75-19.

#### Julius Manekofsky *et al. v.*Guide Realty, Inc. *et al.*

*Samuel A. Olevson,*for plaintiffs. *Coleman B. Zimmerman,*for defendant Sidney L. Rabinowitz.

Motion of defendant Sidney L. Rabinowitz to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16(g) and his motion to dismiss the appeal are denied without prejudice to his right to renew the motions at the hearing on the merits. Doris, J. is of the opinion that the motion to dismiss should be granted for noncompliance with Rule 10(b).
3004.470-2 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Incident* means an occurrence that— ( 1 ) Actually or imminently jeopardizes, without lawful authority, the integrity, confidentiality, or availability of information or an information system; or
( 2 ) Constitutes a violation or imminent threat of violation of law, security policies, security procedures, or acceptable use policies.
# SIP FDS slate 2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883)—(Zoom Meeting).                

*Date and Time:*                     June 2, 2021; 12 p.m.-4 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Zoom).                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

                    Attendance information for the meeting will be forthcoming on the website:                     *https://www.nsf.gov/​mps/​ast/​aaac.jsp.*

*Contact Person:*                     Dr. Martin Still, Program Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite W 9188, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-4290.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                

*Agenda:*                     To hear presentations of current programming by representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving them. Discuss the Committee's draft annual report due 15 March 2021.                

Dated: February 2, 2021.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-02463 Filed 2-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7182

JERRY ROBERT JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-98-817-2)

Submitted: January 18, 2000 Decided: February 4, 2000

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Robert Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Robert Jones appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Angelone, No. CA-98-817-2 (E.D. Va. Aug.

26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8223-8224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02320]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Revisions of Rescissions Proposals Pursuant to the Congressional 
Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974

AGENCY: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and 
Budget.

ACTION: Notice of revisions to rescissions proposed pursuant to the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 1014(d) of the Congressional Budget and 
Impoundment Control Act of 1974, OMB is issuing a supplementary special 
message from the President in regard to the rescissions proposals that 
were previously transmitted to the Congress on January 14, 2021 under 
section 1012(a) of that Act. The supplementary special message was 
transmitted to the Congress on January 31, 2021. The supplementary 
special message reports the withdrawal of all 73 proposals.

DATES: The Congress was notified on January 31, 2021.

ADDRESSES: This supplementary special message is available on-line on 
the OMB website at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/

[[Page 8224]]

omb/supplementals-amendments-and-releases/.

Robert Fairweather,
Acting Director.

Dear Madam President: (Dear Madam Speaker:)
    In accordance with section 1014(c) of the Congressional Budget 
and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 685(c)), I am 
withdrawing 73 proposed rescissions previously transmitted to the 
Congress.
    The withdrawals are for the Departments of Agriculture, 
Commerce, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland 
Security, the Interior, Justice, Labor, State, and the Treasury, as 
well as the African Development Foundation, the Commission of Fine 
Arts, the Corporation for National and Community Service, the 
District of Columbia, the Environmental Protection Agency, the 
Inter-American Foundation, the Millennium Challenge Corporation, the 
National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities, the National 
Gallery of Art, the Peace Corps, the Presidio Trust, the United 
States Agency for International Development, the United States Army 
Corps of Engineers, the Woodrow Wilson International Center for 
Scholars, and the Legislative Branch.
    The details of the rescission withdrawals are contained in the 
attached report.

Sincerely,

Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Rescission proposals nos. R21-1 through R21-73

SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT

Report Pursuant to Section 1014(c) of the Congressional Budget and 
Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 685(c))
    This report updates Rescission proposals R21-1 through R21-73, 
which were transmitted to the Congress on January 14, 2021.
    This report withdraws all of the rescission proposals transmitted 
on January 14, 2021.

[FR Doc. 2021-02320 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
# C_2019053EN.01000201.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 February 2019

(2019/C 53/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1346 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4634 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87490 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4973 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1357 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7693 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,806 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 318,33 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3064 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7485 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,9488 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6006 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5098 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9020 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6809 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5376 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 273,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4417 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6527 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 844,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6173 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,149 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,8085 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,723 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2095 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6028 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,8655 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1346

JPY

Japanese yen

124,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4634

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87490

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4973

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1357

ISK

Iceland króna

136,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7693

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,806

HUF

Hungarian forint

318,33

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3064

RON

Romanian leu

4,7485

TRY

Turkish lira

5,9488

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6006

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5098

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9020

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6809

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5376

KRW

South Korean won

1 273,96

ZAR

South African rand

15,4417

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6527

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 844,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6173

PHP

Philippine peso

59,149

RUB

Russian rouble

74,8085

THB

Thai baht

35,723

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2095

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6028

INR

Indian rupee

80,8655

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

JEFFREY SATTERFIELD, Individually and On 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LIME ENERGY CO., JOHN O’ROURKE, 

DAVID R. ASPLUND, and JEFFREY 

MISTARZ, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:12-cv-05704 

CLASS ACTION 

Hon. Sara L. Ellis 

Magistrate Judge Daniel G. Martin 

May 13, 2014 Hearing Date 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND 

REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVES 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (h) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 (d) (2), and in accordance with 

this Court’s Order of January 28, 2014 (Dkt. No. 95), Lead Plaintiffs Jamie Fang and Kevin J. 

Fetzer (“Lead Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated, and their undersigned counsel (“Lead Counsel”) move this Court for their reasonable 

and negotiated attorneys’ fees in the total amount of $750,000, reimbursement of Lead Counsel 

for their costs in the total amount of $41,409, and reimbursement of Lead Plaintiffs in the 

amount of $1,000 each in connection with the settlement of the above-captioned matter. 

As support for their Motion, Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel rely upon their 

contemporaneously-filed Memorandum of Law. 

WHEREFORE, Lead Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant their instant 

Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and Reimbursement Payment to Class 

Representatives. 

Case: 1:12-cv-05704 Document #: 103 Filed: 04/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:913
2 

April 14, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 

POMERANTZ LLP 

/s/ Leigh Handelman Smollar

Patrick V. Dahlstrom 

Leigh Handelman Smollar 

Louis C. Ludwig 

Ten South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Tel: (312) 377-1181 

Fax: (312) 377-1184 

 Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 

Case: 1:12-cv-05704 Document #: 103 Filed: 04/14/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:914
315.305 Proposal evaluation. ( c ) *Use of non-Federal evaluators.* ( 1 ) Except when peer review is required by statute as provided in 315.303-70(a), decisions to disclose proposals to non-Federal evaluators shall be made by the official responsible for appointing Source Selection Evaluation Team members in accordance with OPDIV procedures. The avoidance of organizational and personal conflicts of interest must be taken into consideration when making the decision to use non-Federal evaluators.
( 2 ) When a solicited proposal will be disclosed outside the Government to a contractor or a contractor employee for evaluation purposes, the following or similar conditions shall be part of the written agreement with the contractor prior to disclosure: CONDITIONS FOR EVALUATING PROPOSALS
The contractor agrees that it and its employees, as well as any subcontractors and their employees (in these conditions, “evaluator”) will use the data (trade secrets, business data, and technical data) contained in the proposal for evaluation purposes only. The foregoing requirement does not apply to data obtained from another source without restriction. Any notice or legend placed on the proposal by either HHS or the offeror shall be applied to any reproduction or abstract provided to the evaluator or made by the evaluator. Upon completion of the evaluation, the evaluator shall return to the Government the furnished copy of the proposal or abstract, and all copies thereof, to the HHS office which initially furnished the proposal for evaluation. The evaluator shall not contact the offeror concerning any aspects of a proposal's contents.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 505 

Recognizing the roles and contributions of the teachers of the United States 

in building and enhancing the civic, cultural, and economic well-being 

of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2018 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

TOOMEY, Mr. DAINES, Mr. KING, Mrs. MURRAY, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CARPER, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. UDALL, Ms. WARREN, Mr. COONS, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. KAINE, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. HIRONO, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. HOEVEN, Ms. 

STABENOW, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. JONES, Ms. CORTEZ

MASTO, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. HATCH, Ms. DUCKWORTH, and 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the roles and contributions of the teachers of 

the United States in building and enhancing the civic, 

cultural, and economic well-being of the United States. 

Whereas education and knowledge are foundational to the 

current and future strength of the United States; 

Whereas teachers and other education staff have earned and 

deserve the respect of their students and communities for 

the selfless dedication of the teachers and staff to community service and the futures of the children of the 

United States; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 505 ATS 

Whereas the purposes of National Teacher Appreciation 

Week, celebrated from May 7, 2018, through May 11, 

2018, are— 

(1) to raise public awareness of the unquantifiable 

contributions of teachers; and 

(2) to promote greater respect and understanding 

for the teaching profession; and 

Whereas students, schools, communities, and a number of organizations representing educators are hosting teacher 

appreciation events in recognition of National Teacher 

Appreciation Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) thanks the teachers of the United States; 

3 and 

4 (2) promotes the profession of teaching by en5 couraging students, parents, school administrators, 

6 and public officials to participate in teacher appre7 ciation events during National Teacher Appreciation 

8 Week. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 30 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 30

  Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 
Resolution, to remove all United States Armed Forces, other than United 
States Armed Forces assigned to protect the United States Embassy, from 
                                Somalia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2023

Mr. Gaetz (for himself, Mrs. Luna, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Burchett, Ms. Greene 
     of Georgia, and Mr. Biggs) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 
Resolution, to remove all United States Armed Forces, other than United 
States Armed Forces assigned to protect the United States Embassy, from 
                                Somalia.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 
1544(c)), Congress directs the President to remove all United States 
Armed Forces, other than United States Armed Forces assigned to protect 
the United States Embassy, from Somalia by not later than the date that 
is 365 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
22.1407 Actions because of noncompliance. The contracting officer shall take necessary action, as soon as possible upon notification by the appropriate agency official, to implement any sanctions imposed on a contractor by the Department of Labor for violations of the clause at 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities. These sanctions (see 41 CFR 60-741.66) may include— ( a ) Withholding from payments otherwise due;
( b ) Termination or suspension of the contract; or
( c ) Debarment of the contractor.
[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 34074, June 22, 1998; 79 FR 43578, July 25, 2014]
Exhibit 31.1



Certification



I, David N. Siegel, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of US Airways, Inc.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]



(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David N. Siegel                                                                    
|Name: David N. Siegel Title: President and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 12, 2004