alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:2760
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 2 of 21 PageID #:2761
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 3 of 21 PageID #:2762
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 4 of 21 PageID #:2763
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 5 of 21 PageID #:2764
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 6 of 21 PageID #:2765
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 7 of 21 PageID #:2766
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 8 of 21 PageID #:2767
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 9 of 21 PageID #:2768
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 10 of 21 PageID #:2769
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 11 of 21 PageID #:2770
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 12 of 21 PageID #:2771
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 13 of 21 PageID #:2772
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 14 of 21 PageID #:2773
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 15 of 21 PageID #:2774
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 16 of 21 PageID #:2775
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 17 of 21 PageID #:2776
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 18 of 21 PageID #:2777
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 19 of 21 PageID #:2778
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 20 of 21 PageID #:2779
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 116-4 Filed: 10/21/14 Page 21 of 21 PageID #:2780
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Flava Works, Inc

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05844

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

FF Magnat Limited, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, October 12, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Status hearing is set for

10/23/2012 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (gds)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 13 Filed: 10/12/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:696
#### 1852.219-11 Special 8(a) contract conditions.

As prescribed in 1819.811-3(a), insert the following clause in lieu of 52.219-11:

# Special 8(a) Contract Conditions (APR 2015)

(a) This contract is issued as a direct award between the contracting activity and the 8(a) contractor pursuant to a Partnership Agreement between the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Accordingly, the SBA is not a signatory to this contract. SBA does retain responsibility for 8(a) certification, 8(a) eligibility determinations and related issues, and providing counseling and assistance to the 8(a) contractor under the 8(a) program. The cognizant SBA district office is:

(*insert name and address of cognizant SBA office*)

(b) The contracting activity is responsible for administering the contract and taking any action on behalf of the Government under the terms and conditions of the contract; provided, however, that the contracting activity shall give advance notice to the SBA before it issues a final notice terminating performance, either in whole or in part, under the contract. The contracting activity shall also coordinate with the SBA prior to processing any novation agreement. The contracting activity may assign contract administration functions to a contract administration office.

(c) The contractor agrees to notify the Contracting Officer, simultaneous with its notification to SBA (as required by SBA's 8(a) regulations), when the owner or owners upon whom 8(a) eligibility is based plan to relinquish ownership or control of the concern. Consistent with Section 407 of Public Law 100-656, transfer of ownership or control shall result in termination of the contract for convenience, unless SBA waives the requirement for termination prior to the actual relinquishing of ownership and control.

(End of clause)

[80 FR 12946, Mar. 12, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 50212, Aug. 19, 2015]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 )

FLAVA WORKS ) Case No: 12 C 5844

)

v. )

) Judge: ROBERT W. GETTLEMAN

)

DOES )

)

ORDER

Motion [96] by counsel Charles Mudd, Stephanie Solera and Mark Petrolis, for defendant

FF Magnat Limited to withdraw as attorney is granted.

(00:05)

Date: September 12, 2013 

ROBERT W. GETTLEMAN

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 98 Filed: 09/12/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2347
Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Hanover Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 1997
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Hanover Bancorp,
Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-7084) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-73472; 33-
73470; and 33-73796) of Hanover Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January
24, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Hanover Bancorp, Inc. incorporated by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                               \s\ Ernst & Young LLP



Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 18, 1997
You may search for current grantees under the State Personnel Development Grants program by accessing the link below: 

**Discretionary Grants Database**
Disclaimer of Endorsement
3.1000 Scope of subpart. This subpart— ( a ) Implements 41 U.S.C. 3509, Notification of Violations of Federal Criminal Law or Overpayments; and
( b ) Prescribes policies and procedures for the establishment of contractor codes of business ethics and conduct, and display of agency Office of Inspector General (OIG) fraud hotline posters.
[79 FR 24197, Apr. 29, 2014]
#### 2817.602 Policy.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 17.602(a).
# C_2018106EN.01000301.xml

| 21.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 March 2018

(2018/C 106/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2276 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4485 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87715 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0563 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1721 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4863 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,423 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2277 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6663 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,8238 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5934 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6040 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6295 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7039 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6174 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 314,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6788 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7744 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4423 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 893,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8091 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,926 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,8466 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,301 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0410 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0086 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,0370 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2276

JPY

Japanese yen

130,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4485

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87715

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0563

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1721

ISK

Iceland króna

122,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4863

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,423

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2277

RON

Romanian leu

4,6663

TRY

Turkish lira

4,8238

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5934

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6040

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6295

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7039

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6174

KRW

South Korean won

1 314,93

ZAR

South African rand

14,6788

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7744

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4423

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 893,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8091

PHP

Philippine peso

63,926

RUB

Russian rouble

70,8466

THB

Thai baht

38,301

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0410

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0086

INR

Indian rupee

80,0370

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
2813.70-2 Procedures. ( a ) The certified invoice procedure for purchases may be used only under FAR part 13 and this part, subject to the following: ( 1 ) The individual transaction amount does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold;
( 2 ) Availability of sufficient funds is verified;
( 3 ) A purchase order is not required by either the supplier or the Government;
( 4 ) The vendor submits approved and appropriate invoices; and,
( 5 ) The items purchased are domestic source end products, except as provided in FAR subpart 25.1.
( b ) Using the certified invoice procedures does not eliminate the requirements in FAR part 13 that apply to purchases at or below the micro-purchase threshold.
( c ) The chief of the contracting office, as defined in JAR 2802.101, may delegate the authority to use the certified invoice procedure. Each delegation must specify any limitations placed on the individual's use of these procedures, such as limits on the amount of each purchase, or limits on the commodities, or services being procured.
( d ) Individuals using this purchasing technique shall require the supplier to immediately submit properly prepared invoices that itemize property or services furnished. Upon receiving the invoice, the individual making the purchase shall annotate the invoice with the date of receipt, verify the accuracy of the invoiced amount and verify on the invoice that the supplies and/or services have been received and accepted. If the invoice is valid and correct, the individual making the purchase shall sign the invoice indicating acceptance and immediately forward it to the appropriate administrative office.
( e ) The administrative office must approve the invoice and, if approved, forward it to the Finance Office for payment. Before forwarding the invoice to the Finance Office, the administrative office shall place the following statement on the invoice, along with the accounting and appropriation data:
#### Peter Corso v. Morris Somers.

Motion for an order directing the return of an attorney’s fee and for other relief denied without prejudice to any other remedies which the movant might have. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
TN TFIE UNITED ST?\'IES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORI'HER}.I DISTR.ICT OF ILLINC)IS

EASTERN DIVISIONI

FEDERAL LIFE INSUR,,{NCE COMPITNY OVIUTUAL)

an Illinois Insurance Corporati on,

Plaintiff.

v.

OLGA ARMENDARIZ, and ERICA GARCltl\,

NO. 12-cv-05;141

HonL. Robert rW. Gettleman

Defendemts.

MOTION FOR ENT'RY OF AGRX]ITD IN'TERPLEADER.TUDGMT}NT

Now comes Plaintiff, by its attonneys, and hereby mrcves for entrry of an A.greed

Interpleader Judgment, and as grounds therefirrs states as follows:

1. This is an action for statutory interprl,eader wherein the defendants have marle

conflicting claims to the proceeds of a life insurance policy.

2.Theparties have agreed, subjecto the Court's approval, that the Plaintiff ltnsurance

Company, as stakeholder, be allowed to deposiit the said insurance proceeds with the Clerk of the

Court, be dismissed from the case, and that ttLe court retain jurisdiction to resolve thLe merits of

the conflicting claims.

3. A copy of the proposed Agreed Interrpleader Judgment signed by the respective

attomeys is attached hereto as Exhibit A..

Wherefore, Plaintiff pr:ays for thtl entry

forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.

of an,Agreed Interpleador Judgmernt as set

r Plaintiff

Case: 1:12-cv-05141 Document #: 22 Filed: 09/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:88
Gary E.Dienstag

Springer, Casey & Dienstag, P'.C.

100 W. Monroe St.

Chicago, n. 60603

312-372-0800

Attornev for Plaintiff

Case: 1:12-cv-05141 Document #: 22 Filed: 09/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:89
# C_2018021EN.01000101.xml

| 20.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 January 2018

(2018/C 21/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2255 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4454 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88365 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8333 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1758 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6243 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,433 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1716 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6594 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6557 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5302 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5246 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5814 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6831 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6178 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 306,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9553 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8481 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4352 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 315,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8260 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,138 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,3324 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,069 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9312 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,8157 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,2390 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2255

JPY

Japanese yen

135,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4454

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88365

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8333

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1758

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6243

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,433

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1716

RON

Romanian leu

4,6594

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6557

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5302

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5246

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5814

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6831

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6178

KRW

South Korean won

1 306,92

ZAR

South African rand

14,9553

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8481

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4352

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 315,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8260

PHP

Philippine peso

62,138

RUB

Russian rouble

69,3324

THB

Thai baht

39,069

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9312

MXN

Mexican peso

22,8157

INR

Indian rupee

78,2390

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2017018EN.01002101.xml

| 19.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/21

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8325 — KKR/Hilding Anders)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 18/03)

On 9 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8325. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8325. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
MAILING ADDRESS: UNITED AIR LINES, INC., 1025 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 1210, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 

STEVE MORRISSEY

MANAGING DIRECTOR—INTERNATIONAL & REGULATORY AFFAIRS

(202) 296-2733 

(202) 296-2873 FAX

STEVE.MORRISSEY@UNITED.COM

November 19, 2010 

Esta Rosenberg, Chief 

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Application of United Air Lines, Inc. to Amend an Exemption (LAX-BJX) 

DOT-OST-2009-0192 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

This is to advise that United has completed its poll of U.S. carrier representatives in the attached 

service list for the above-referenced application, filed on November 17, 2010. No carrier objects 

to the grant of this application. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 Steve Morrissey 

 Managing Director, International & 

Regulatory Affairs 

cc: Linda Lundell 

Service List 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all 

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email: 

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

jyoung@yklaw.com (Spirit) 

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

efaberman@wileyrein.com (Air Tran/Frontier)

howard_kass@usairways.com 

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Hawaiian/Jet Blue)

john.allen@faa.gov 

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

msinick@ssd.com (Alaska)

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com (USA 3000)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

urskr@state.gov 

 

Annalei Avanceña 

Advisor—Regulatory Affairs 

Dated: November 19, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of the
Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, I,
John I. Bradshaw, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, President and
Treasurer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results
            of operations of the Trust.



                                        /S/ John I. Bradshaw, Jr.
                                            Chief Executive Officer, President
                                             and Treasurer
#### John B. Olivier and another *vs.*Henry D. Gurney.

February 27, 1890.

Taxes — Insufficient Description in Published Delinquent List. — The description of the property in controversy in the published list of delinquent taxes for the year in question *held*not to be substantially a copy of the delinquent list filed, and not sufficiently definite and certain to uphold the tax-title claimed to have been acquired by the defendant.

Action brought in the district court for Washington county, to recover possession of lot 3, section 8, town 32, range 21, with $6,000, the value of the use and occupation of the lot for six years next before suit brought. At the trial before *McCluer,*J., it was stipulated that plaintiffs had title unless a tax-title relied on by defendant was valid, in which latter case the defendant should have judgment; *70also that the issue of title should be first tried by the court, and that plaintiffs’ claim for use and occupation and defendant’s claim for improvements should remain open until after the question of title should be determined. The court held the tax-title bad. The defendant appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

*Clark, Eller & How,*for appellant.

*Uri L. Lamprey,*for respondents.

Vanderburgh, J.

The question involved here is the validity of the tax-title claimed to have been acquired by the defendant to the lands in controversy. One ground upon which it is attacked is that the published list does not contain a correct description of such land. The land in controversy is correctly described in the county auditor’s list of delinquent taxes for the year in question as follows:

> In whose name assessed. Subd. Sec. Town. Range. No. acres. Tax.

> II. D. Gurney. Lot 3 8 32 21 233/4 1 71

But in the published list, as shown by the return, the description relied on appears at the head of the tenth column thereof, as follows :

> Name. Lot. See. Acres. Amt.

> Guernsey, H. D. 3 8 233/4 1 71

Other descriptions follow; and lower down in the same column, and extending across it, appeared “Town 32, Bange 22,” and at the bottom of the ninth column appeared, in like manner: “Town 32, Bange 21.” The return fails to show the location of other townships and ranges on the list, and'does not show that any were placed at the head of the list; but it is expressly stated that after the notice the list proceeds as follows:

> “Names of owners. Subd. of sec. Sec. Acres. Amt.”

The point made that the published list is not a correct copy of the list filed, and that upon the list itself, as published, as shown by the return, it does not appear with sufficient certainty in which township or range the lands are included, must be held to be well taken. This, we think, is not covered by the explanatory recital that the town and range were printed across the column in separate lines, and that under such lines appeared the subdivision of the section. This would *71not relieve the uncertainty if there were no town and range placed at the head of the list, and it does not appear that there were, but the fair inference is to the contrary.

Order affirmed.