alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018155EN.01000101.xml

| 3.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 May 2018

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 May 2018

(2018/C 155/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2007 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4488 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88040 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6174 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1957 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6958 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,601 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,04 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2755 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6635 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,9813 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5987 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5401 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4250 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7103 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6025 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 291,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1336 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6353 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4110 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 762,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7223 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,301 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,4000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,092 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2293 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,7479 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,0455 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2007

JPY

Japanese yen

131,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4488

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88040

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6174

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1957

ISK

Iceland króna

122,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6958

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,601

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,04

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2755

RON

Romanian leu

4,6635

TRY

Turkish lira

4,9813

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5987

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5401

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4250

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7103

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6025

KRW

South Korean won

1 291,54

ZAR

South African rand

15,1336

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6353

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4110

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 762,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7223

PHP

Philippine peso

62,301

RUB

Russian rouble

76,4000

THB

Thai baht

38,092

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2293

MXN

Mexican peso

22,7479

INR

Indian rupee

80,0455

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
Exhibit 10.1


 


Description of Compensation
Arrangement for Non-Executive Directors


 


Non-executive directors
continue to be entitled to receive annual fees equal to $70,000.


 


Effective January 1,
2010, the Audit Committee chairperson is entitled to receive an additional
annual fee equal to $10,000, the Compensation Committee chairperson is entitled
to receive an additional annual fee equal to $7,500, and the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee chairperson is entitled to receive an additional
annual fee equal to $4,000.


 


Non-executive directors
continue to be entitled to receive $1,000 for any meeting of the Board of
Directors (the “Board”) or a committee thereof that they attend.


 


Directors may elect to
receive fees in the form of common stock pursuant to the Advance America, Cash
Advance Centers, Inc. Policy Regarding Receipt of Common Stock in Lieu of
Cash Director’s Fees.


 


All directors are
entitled to reimbursement of their expenses incurred in connection with
participating in Board and committee meetings.
# C_2018096EN.01000201.xml

| 14.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 March 2018

(2018/C 96/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2378 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4486 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88650 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1568 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1690 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5808 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,471 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,91 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2119 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6619 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,7822 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5683 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5890 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7031 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6842 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6224 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 316,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5787 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8265 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4412 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 973,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8192 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,291 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,3046 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,632 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0142 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9180 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,2840 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2378

JPY

Japanese yen

132,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4486

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88650

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1568

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1690

ISK

Iceland króna

123,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5808

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,471

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,91

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2119

RON

Romanian leu

4,6619

TRY

Turkish lira

4,7822

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5683

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5890

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7031

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6842

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6224

KRW

South Korean won

1 316,84

ZAR

South African rand

14,5787

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8265

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4412

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 973,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8192

PHP

Philippine peso

64,291

RUB

Russian rouble

70,3046

THB

Thai baht

38,632

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0142

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9180

INR

Indian rupee

80,2840

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
exv10w2







Exhibit 10.2




ARBITRON INC.

SECOND WAIVER AND AMENDMENT OF

EXECUTIVE RETENTION AGREEMENT




     This is an agreement (the “Agreement”) between Arbitron Inc. (“Arbitron”) and Pierre C.
Bouvard (“you”), dated as of October 1, 2009. Except as otherwise defined herein, capitalized
terms used in this Agreement have the same definition as in the Executive Retention Agreement
between Arbitron and you, dated as of August 28, 2008 (the “Retention Agreement”), as amended by
the Waiver and Amendment of Executive Retention Agreement between Arbitron and you, dated as of
March 17, 2009.



     WHEREAS, Arbitron is restructuring certain management positions, including yours; and



     WHEREAS, you have undergone a Position Diminishment and the Retention Agreement, as amended,
allows you to resign under a Position Diminishment as a result of your restructured position, but
Arbitron would like you to remain employed in your revised position as Executive Vice President,
Cross-Platform Services, and you have agreed to do so and to waive any further protections under
Position Diminishment.



     THEREFORE, Arbitron and you agree as follows, in consideration of the services to be received
from you and the ongoing compensation to which you will be entitled and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties hereby acknowledge:



     (1) The Recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference.



     (2) Section 2.3 of the Retention Agreement is amended by striking “Other than for Position
Diminishment” in the title and “or for Position Diminishment” in the text.



     (3) Section 2.4 of the Retention Agreement is amended by striking “or by the Executive for
Position Diminishment” in the title, “or the Executive resigns as a result of Position
Diminishment” in the first paragraph, and deleting Subsection (d) of Section 2.4 in its entirety.



     (4) Section 2.5 of the Retention Agreement is amended by striking the following in subsection
(a) “or (y) on or before the Position Diminishment Termination Date (as defined in Section
2.5(b)),” and “(ii) the Executive’s resignation other than for Position Diminishment” and
deleting subsection (b) in its entirety.



     (5) Section 7.17 of the Retention Agreement is amended by deleting the definitions of “Date of
Position Diminishment” and “Position Diminishment”.



     (6) Except as expressly modified hereby, all other provisions of the Retention Agreement
remain in effect as written.



Signatures on Page Following




 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
set forth above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ARBITRON INC.	 	EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ Timothy T. Smith	 	/s/ Pierre C. Bouvard	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Timothy T. Smith
	 	Pierre C. Bouvard	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Executive Vice President & Chief
Legal Officer	 	 	 	 







-2-
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 377 

Recognizing the importance of paying tribute to those individuals who have 

faithfully served and retired from the Armed Forces of the United 

States, designating April 18, 2018, as ‘‘Military Retiree Appreciation 

Day’’, and encouraging the people of the United States to honor the 

past and continued service of military retirees to their local communities 

and the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2018 

Ms. WARREN (for herself and Mr. CRUZ) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of paying tribute to those individuals who have faithfully served and retired from the 

Armed Forces of the United States, designating April 

18, 2018, as ‘‘Military Retiree Appreciation Day’’, and 

encouraging the people of the United States to honor 

the past and continued service of military retirees to 

their local communities and the United States. 

Whereas there are approximately 2,000,000 retirees of the 

Armed Forces of the United States who have earned 

their retirement through career service, a service-connected disability, or both; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 377 IS 

Whereas military retirees show an unrivaled dedication to 

service, having faithfully served their country and dedicated much of their lives knowing that at any moment 

they could be sent anywhere in the world and possibly 

asked to make the ultimate sacrifice to protect and defend the national security of the United States; 

Whereas military retirees, through their perseverance and 

dedication— 

(1) have proven to be leaders who are resilient, focused, disciplined, well-trained, and well-educated; and 

(2) bring the best qualities of citizenship in the 

United States to lifelong service within their national and 

local communities as dependable, responsible citizens and 

neighbors; 

Whereas the qualities of a military retiree often result in 

positive contributions to— 

(1) the civilian workforce, as experienced and knowledgeable employees; 

(2) local educational institutions, as teachers, counselors, and coaches; 

(3) local government, as elected public servants; and 

(4) communities, as dedicated and effective volunteers; 

Whereas the dedication and focus of military retirees helps 

strengthen and stabilize local communities; and 

Whereas the contributions of military retirees to their communities are the manifestation of the desire of the retirees to continue their selfless acts of volunteering and 

their lifelong service to the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 377 IS 

1 (1) designates April 18, 2018, as ‘‘Military Re2 tiree Appreciation Day’’; and 

3 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

4 to honor the past and continued service of military 

5 retirees to their local communities and the United 

6 States through appropriate ceremonies and other ac7 tivities. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### 31.602 General.

The OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and appendices V and VII sets forth the principles for determining the allowable costs of contracts and subcontracts with State, local, and federally recognized Indian tribal governments. These principles are for cost determination and are not intended to identify the circumstances or dictate the extent of Federal and State or local participation in financing a particular contract.

[48 FR 42301, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 45853, July 14, 2016]
#### 3404.001 Definitions.

*Federal record,* as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3301, includes all recorded information, regardless of form or characteristics, made or received by the Department under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by the Department or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the U.S. Government or because of the informational value of data in them.

*Records inventory* means a descriptive listing of each Federal record series or system that a contractor creates, receives, or maintains in performance of the contract, together with an indication of its location, retention, custodian, volume, and other pertinent data.
#### 3018.109 Priorities and allocations.

DHS Components may assign priority ratings on contracts and orders as authorized by the Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS).

[77 FR 50635, Sept. 21, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 17315, Apr. 2, 2021]
## RVAA**C Sub**  **- committee**  **on Communications -**  **Meeting # 6**  **Conference Call**
**– July**  **3 , 2014**  **(1 to 3 pm ET)** Agenda 1. Introductions

– Rose 2. Brief discussion on work to date

– Jim Pecht 3. Continue discussing the remaining scoping Categories

– Terry Pacheco 4. Sub
-committee Homework

– Terry Pacheco 5. Date of next conference call : August 7 th 

## , 1
-3 pm 6. Closing remarks Signage Subcommittee **Rail Vehicle Sign Scoping Categories –**  **Work to date after 6/5 Conference Call** Large bold **X**s in table boxes indicate category req uirements the subcommittee has made decisions on (with footnote qualifications in parenthesis). Numbers in boxes indicate votes from committee members for requirements on issues still to be discussed.

Category **Tactile & Visual**  **Visual VMS**  **Not Required**  **Rail Type** Directional Signs (i ncludes directional Exit Signs) 

## X Designation Signs for Spaces (includes Exit Signs) 

## X (e) Designation Signs for Elements 

## X No n - Emergency Informational Signs 

## X (b ) (f) Non

- Emergency Operational Signs 

## X (d ) 

## X (c ) Emergency Informational Signs 1 1 Emergency Operational Signs 1 1 Caution and Safety Signs (includes icons and logos) 2 Stop Identification Signs (includes train designation, route, and final destination) 2 (a) 2

Menus and Directories 

## X (g) Employee Only Signs 

## X(a) 

### 1. All cars must provide variable message signs in two locations so that at least one

sign is visible from every part of the car. The variable message signs must provide equal information as what is provided aurally. If stops are announced, the signs should announce stops, if emergencies are announced; the signs should announce emergencies, and so forth.2. All cars must provide route map tracking signs in two locations so that at least one sign is vis ible from every part of the car. (b) Meet the size requirement for visual characters where practicable. (c) Meet the size requirement for visual characters where practicable. (d) Where instructions for door latch/locks are provided they shall be both visual and tactile and be located _______. Where a pictogram is provided for these instructions a tactile description shall be provided directly below it. (e) The ISA shall be provided at required wheelchair spaces and be located ________. (f) The ISA shall be provided at priority seating and be located __________. (g) At least one menu or directory shall comply.
#### Louis S. BULLARD, Special Agent, FBI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William H. WEBSTER, Director, FBI, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 81-4438

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 25, 1982.

Louis S. Bullard, pro se.

Penny O. Seaman, Civ. Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Jerry A. Davis, Asst. U. S. Atty., Biloxi, Miss., for defendants-appellees.

*93Before GEE, GARZA and TATE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

FBI Agent Bullard originally brought suit against the director of the FBI, claiming that his transfer decision was arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory, and violative of FBI regulations. This action was brought before us, and we dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction because the transfer decision was committed to agency discretion. *Bullard v. Webster,*623 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1980). Bullard presented us with no basis, statutory, regulatory, or otherwise, for reviewing the decision of the FBI. *Id.*at 1046.

Bullard brought this second action contesting his transfer on the claim of age discrimination under 29 U.S.C. § 633(a). The district court found that his claim was barred by res judicata. If judgment is on the merits, res judicata is an absolute bar in another case on the same cause of action between the same parties not only on the claims presented but also as to every ground as to recovery that might have been presented. *Acree v. Airline Pilots Association,*390 F.2d 199, 202-03 (5th Cir. 1968). However, the res judicata effect of a jurisdictional decision, such as we have here, is “not binding as to all matters which could have been raised.” *Equitable Trust Co. v. Commodity Futures Commission,*669 F.2d 269, 272 (5th Cir. 1982). “A jurisdictional dismissal forecloses only those issues of fact or law that were actually litigated and necessarily decided by a valid and final judgment between the parties.” *Id.*We therefore vacate and remand for a decision on the age discrimination claim.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
#### Selma Newman, as Guardian ad Litem, for Rose Hirsch, et al., Petitioners, v Carmen Shang, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review determinations of the respondent State commissioner made after statutory fair hearings, which affirmed determinations of the local agency, reducing petitioners’ home health aide assistance. Petition granted to the extent that the determinations are annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to restore petitioners’ home health aide assistance retroactive to the dates of their termination; the petition is otherwise dismissed on the merits. The State commissioner’s determinations were not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole (see *Matter of Roach v Toia,*58 AD2d 652; see, also, *Matter of Schadt v Sardino,*48 AD2d 171, 174). Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
# C_2018072EN.01000101.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 072/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.

OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.

OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.

OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.

OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.

OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 3028.310-70 Contract clause.

Insert a clause substantially similar to (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.228-70, “Insurance,” in all solicitations and contracts that contain the clause at (FAR) 47 CFR 52.228-5.
Case: 1:12-cv-05017 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/27/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:53
Case: 1:12-cv-05017 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/27/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:54
Case: 1:12-cv-05017 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/27/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:55
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Oree, Appellant.

— Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. Defendant was one of three persons charged with participating in a robbery. All three were tried together. All three made confessions. The confessions of the other two defendants implicated appellant. Their confessions were received in evidence without the jury being advised that they were not admissible to establish the guilt of defendant. The error was com-' pounded by reference in summation and charge to these confessions without distinguishing between them. Even in the absence of proper exceptions, this deprived defendant of a fair trial *(People*v. *Marshall,*306 N. Y. 223; *People*v. *Lombard,*4 A D 2d 666; *People*v. *Driscoll,*20 A D 2d 880). Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steiner, JJ.
');
	document.write('

## Key Staff

**Division Director:**
James Laws, (202) 453-7348**Division Administrative Assistant:**
Alan Baldwin, (202) 453-6394

**Program Officers:**

Lead Program Officer - Pearson Owens, (202) 453-7997pearson.owens@ed.gov

Christopher Smith, (202) 453-7946christopher.smith@ed.gov

**Mailing address:**

FIPSE Home
32.703-1 General. ( a ) If the contract is fully funded, funds are obligated to cover the price or target price of a fixed-price contract or the estimated cost and any fee of a cost-reimbursement contract.
( b ) If the contract is incrementally funded, funds are obligated to cover the amount allotted and any corresponding increment of fee.
315.303-70 Policy. ( a ) If an operating division (OPDIV) is required by statute to use peer review for technical review of proposals, the requirements of those statutes, any implementing regulatory requirements, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and as applicable, any approved Department of Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation (HHSAR) deviation(s) from this subpart take precedence over the otherwise applicable requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The statutes that require such review and implementing regulations are as follows: National Institutes of Health—42 U.S.C. 289a, Peer Review Requirements and 42 CFR part 52h, Scientific Peer Review of Research Grant Applications and Research and Development Contract Projects; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration—42 U.S.C. 290aa-3, Peer Review and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality—42 U.S.C. 299c-1, Peer review with respect to grants and contracts.
#### 31.205 Selected costs.