alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

USA v. Nash (Foxworth)

09-4581-cr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED

ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE

PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A

DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN

ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST

SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals

2 for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan

3 United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of

4 New York, on the 22 day of November, two thousand ten. nd

5

6 PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,

7 Chief Judge,

8 JOSÉ A. CABRANES,

9 JOHN M. WALKER, JR.,

10 Circuit Judges.

11

12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

14

15 Appellee,

16

17 -v.- 09-4581-cr

18

19 JASON FOXWORTH, 

20

21 Defendant-Appellant.

22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

23

24 FOR APPELLANT: Neil B. Checkman

25 Law Office of Neil B. Checkman, Esq.

26 111 Broadway, Suite 1305

27 New York, NY 10006

28
2

1 FOR APPELLEE: Avi Weitzman

2 Wai Shun Wilson Leung

3 Daniel A. Braun

4 U.S. Attorney’s Office SDNY

5 1 St. Andrew’s Plaza

6 New York, NY 10007

7

8 Appeal from sentence imposed by the United States

9 District Court for the Southern District of New York

10 (Kaplan, J.).

11

12 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED

13 AND DECREED that the district court’s sentence be AFFIRMED. 

14

15 Jason Foxworth challenges his 68-month prison sentence,

16 which was imposed by the United States District Court for

17 the Southern District of New York after Foxworth was

18 convicted of bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud. 

19 We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying

20 facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for

21 review.

22

23 Appellate review of a district court’s sentence has two

24 components: procedural review and substantive review. 

25 United States v. Cavera, 550 F.3d 180, 189 (2d Cir. 2008)

26 (in banc). If the appellate court finds no procedural

27 error, the substantive review is done under an abuse-of28 discretion standard. Id. at 187 (citing Gall v. United

29 States, 552 U.S. 38, 46 (2007)). Under the abuse-of30 discretion standard, an appellate court will vacate the

31 district court’s sentence only in “exceptional cases where

32 the trial court’s decision ‘cannot be located within the

33 range of permissible decisions.’” Cavera, 550 F.3d at 189

34 (quoting United States v. Rigas, 490 F.3d 208, 238 (2d Cir.

35 2007)).

36

37 Concluding that the district court committed no

38 procedural error and that the 68-month sentence it imposed

39 was reasonable and well within “the range of permissible

40 decisions,” we hereby AFFIRM the sentence.

41

42 FOR THE COURT:

43 CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE, CLERK

44
34.002 Policy. The policies of this part are designed to ensure that agencies acquire major systems in the most effective, economical, and timely manner. Agencies acquiring major systems shall— ( a ) Promote innovation and full and open competition as required by part 6 in the development of major system concepts by ( 1 ) expressing agency needs and major system acquisition program objectives in terms of the agency's mission and not in terms of specified systems to satisfy needs, and
( 2 ) focusing agency resources and special management attention on activities conducted in the initial stage of major programs; and
( b ) Sustain effective competition between alternative system concepts and sources for as long as it is beneficial.
[48 FR 42351, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 52434, Dec. 23, 1985]
243.204-70-6 Allowable profit. When the final price of an unpriced change order is negotiated after a substantial portion of the required performance has been completed, the head of the contracting activity shall ensure the profit allowed reflects— ( a ) Any reduced cost risk to the contractor for costs incurred during contract performance before negotiation of the final price;
( b ) Any reduced cost risk to the contractor for costs expected to be incurred during performance of the remainder of the contract; and
( c ) The extent to which costs have been incurred prior to definitization of the unpriced change order (see 215.404-71-3(d)(2)). The risk assessment shall be documented in the price negotiation memorandum .
[75 FR 48277, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 83 FR 30587, June 29, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,250
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (895)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 241 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2017 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. MANCHIN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. TESTER, Ms. 

WARREN, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, 

Mr. PETERS, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. 

MERKLEY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. ERNST, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. MORAN, Mr. DAINES, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

HELLER, Mr. NELSON, Mr. DONNELLY, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted 

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart 

Recognition Day. 

Whereas, on August 7, 1782, during the Revolutionary War, 

General George Washington established what is now 

known as the Purple Heart Medal when he issued an 

order establishing the Badge of Military Merit; 

Whereas the Badge of Military Merit was designed in the 

shape of a heart in purple cloth or silk; 

Whereas, while the award of the Badge of Military Merit 

ceased with the end of the Revolutionary War, the Purple 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 241 ATS 

Heart Medal was authorized in 1932 as the official successor decoration to the Badge of Military Merit; 

Whereas the Purple Heart Medal is the oldest United States 

military decoration in present use; 

Whereas the Purple Heart Medal is awarded in the name of 

the President of the United States to recognize members 

of the Armed Forces who are killed or wounded in action 

against an enemy of the United States or are killed or 

wounded while held as prisoners of war; 

Whereas the Purple Heart Medal has been awarded to an estimated 1,800,000 recipients; and 

Whereas August 7, 2017, is an appropriate day to celebrate 

as National Purple Heart Recognition Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Purple Heart Recognition Day; and 

4 (2) encourages all people of the United 

5 States— 

6 (A) to learn about the history of the Pur7 ple Heart Medal; 

8 (B) to honor recipients of the Purple 

9 Heart Medal; and 

10 (C) to conduct appropriate ceremonies, ac11 tivities, and programs to demonstrate support 

12 for people who have been awarded the Purple 

13 Heart Medal. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
32.005 Consideration for contract financing. ( a ) *Requirement.* When a contract financing clause is included at the inception of a contract, there shall be no separate consideration for the contract financing clause. The value of the contract financing to the contractor is expected to be reflected in either ( 1 ) A bid or negotiated price that will be lower than such price would have been in the absence of the contract financing, or
( 2 ) Contract terms and conditions, other than price, that are more beneficial to the Government than they would have been in the absence of the contract financing. Adequate new consideration is required for changes to, or the addition of, contract financing after award.
( b ) *Amount of new consideration.* The contractor may provide new consideration by monetary or nonmonetary means, provided the value is adequate. The fair and reasonable consideration should approximate the amount by which the price would have been less had the contract financing terms been contained in the initial contract. In the absence of definite information on this point, the contracting officer should apply the following criteria in evaluating whether the proposed new consideration is adequate: ( 1 ) The value to the contractor of the anticipated amount and duration of the contract financing at the imputed financial costs of the equivalent working capital.
( 2 ) The estimated profit rate to be earned through contract performance.
( c ) *Interest.* Except as provided in subpart 32.4, Advance Payments for Other Than Commercial Acquisitions, the contract shall not provide for any other type of specific charges, such as interest, for contract financing.
[60 FR 49710, Sept. 26, 1995, as amended at 86 FR 61029, Nov. 4, 2021]
# C_2018264EN.01000301.xml

| 26.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 July 2018

(2018/C 264/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1690 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4513 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88855 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2925 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1598 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 124,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5485 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,675 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 325,92 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2996 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6275 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,6563 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5766 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5341 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1714 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7173 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5931 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 312,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4426 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9047 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4020 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 884,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7409 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,291 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,5813 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,893 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3539 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,9426 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,3640 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1690

JPY

Japanese yen

129,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4513

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88855

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2925

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1598

ISK

Iceland króna

124,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5485

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,675

HUF

Hungarian forint

325,92

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2996

RON

Romanian leu

4,6275

TRY

Turkish lira

5,6563

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5766

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5341

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1714

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7173

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5931

KRW

South Korean won

1 312,47

ZAR

South African rand

15,4426

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9047

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4020

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 884,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7409

PHP

Philippine peso

62,291

RUB

Russian rouble

73,5813

THB

Thai baht

38,893

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3539

MXN

Mexican peso

21,9426

INR

Indian rupee

80,3640

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 250.101-2-70 Limitations on payment.

See 10 U.S.C. 3862 for limitations on Congressionally directed payment of a request for equitable adjustment to contract terms or a request for relief under Public Law 85-804.

[73 FR 46815, Aug. 12, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 76996, Dec. 16, 2022]
# C_2018392EN.01000101.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 392/01)

Last publication

OJ C 381, 22.10.2018

Past publications

OJ C 373, 15.10.2018

OJ C 364, 8.10.2018

OJ C 352, 1.10.2018

OJ C 341, 24.9.2018

OJ C 328, 17.9.2018

OJ C 319, 10.9.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

117 KA 14-00840 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEEVESTER L. PAYTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM G. PIXLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (James J. Piampiano, J.), rendered April 10, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495). “Any inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony were highlighted by defense counsel, and the jury’s resolution of credibility issues with respect to the testimony of the victim is entitled to great deference” ( People v DiTucci , 81 AD3d 1249, 1250, lv denied 17 NY3d 794). Defendant further contends that County Court abused its discretion in admitting in evidence a crime scene video depicting the victim after the shooting because, although it concededly was relevant, it was highly prejudicial. We reject that contention ( see People v Stevens , 76 NY2d 833, 835; People v Pobliner
, 32 NY2d 356, 369-370, rearg denied 33 NY2d 657, cert denied 416 US 905; People v Garcia
, 143 AD3d 1283, 1283-1284).

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# C_2016386EN.01000201.xml

| 20.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8203 — Blackstone/New Mountain/JDA Software)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 386/03)

On 10 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8203. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8203. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**First in the World (FITW) Program**

**Directory of FY 2014 Development Grantees Listed by State**

[9/17/2015]
# C_2018024EN.01000101.xml

| 24.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 January 2018

(2018/C 24/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2249 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8443 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1779 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6380 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,403 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1696 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6710 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6295 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5365 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5289 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5760 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6722 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6162 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 317,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8551 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8466 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4306 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 345,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8153 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,501 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,2007 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,989 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9453 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0622 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,1180 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2249

JPY

Japanese yen

135,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87830

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8443

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1779

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6380

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,403

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1696

RON

Romanian leu

4,6710

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6295

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5365

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5289

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5760

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6722

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6162

KRW

South Korean won

1 317,85

ZAR

South African rand

14,8551

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8466

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4306

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 345,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8153

PHP

Philippine peso

62,501

RUB

Russian rouble

69,2007

THB

Thai baht

38,989

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9453

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0622

INR

Indian rupee

78,1180

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2017383EN.01000301.xml

| 14.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 November 2017

(2017/C 383/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1656 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4416 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89018 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7705 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1591 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4913 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,567 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,04 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2349 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6562 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5318 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5256 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4809 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0906 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6877 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5867 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 305,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9688 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7410 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5500 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 810,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8856 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,724 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,3309 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,535 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8362 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,3482 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,2910 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1656

JPY

Japanese yen

132,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4416

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89018

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7705

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1591

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4913

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,567

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,04

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2349

RON

Romanian leu

4,6562

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5318

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5256

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4809

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0906

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6877

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5867

KRW

South Korean won

1 305,01

ZAR

South African rand

16,9688

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7410

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5500

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 810,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8856

PHP

Philippine peso

59,724

RUB

Russian rouble

69,3309

THB

Thai baht

38,535

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8362

MXN

Mexican peso

22,3482

INR

Indian rupee

76,2910

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---