alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017105EN.01000501.xml

| 4.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/5

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 April 2017

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 April 2017

(2017/C 105/06)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0661 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4374 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85260 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5145 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0682 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1468 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,044 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,68 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2279 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8831 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4012 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4229 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2858 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5226 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4899 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 191,09 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4506 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3423 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4305 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 203,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7202 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,456 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 60,0802 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,658 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3314 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9794 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,2805 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0661

JPY

Japanese yen

118,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4374

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85260

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5145

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0682

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1468

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,044

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,68

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2279

RON

Romanian leu

4,5495

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8831

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4012

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4229

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2858

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5226

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4899

KRW

South Korean won

1 191,09

ZAR

South African rand

14,4506

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3423

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4305

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 203,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7202

PHP

Philippine peso

53,456

RUB

Russian rouble

60,0802

THB

Thai baht

36,658

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3314

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9794

INR

Indian rupee

69,2805

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
September 1, 2016

Ms. Jennifer Lee Counsel for Morris P. Herbert, Inc.
P.O. Box 699 Hammond, LA 70404

Re: FAA-2015-3478

Dear Ms. Lee:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and
have determined that we will con tinue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov , we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request. We have determined that your request requires further regulatory relief (T ier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federa l Register for public comments, if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final deci sion on your petition as s oon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/ Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2 -- CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Annual Report of First Financial Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael A. Carty, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

   (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
   Corporation.

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is
not being filed for any other purpose.

Date: March 15, 2005

Michael A. Carty, Signed
---------------------------------
Michael A. Carty
#### (A) Gustave Silverman et al. v. Gabriel A. Newgold. (B) Donald Klauber v. United Artists Associated, Inc.

[In each action] Application denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-11 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:812 Case 2:12-cv-01057-GMN -RJJ Document 83-17 Filed 08/07/12 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Trekeymian Jamal Allison, Appellant

No. 06-18-00081-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 188th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 46,569-

A). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Trekeymian Jamal Allison, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 28, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
322.810 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( h ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.222-70, Contractor Cooperation in Equal Employment Opportunity Investigations, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that include the clause at FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Annual Performance Report

The **2022-23 Child Care Access Means Parents in School (CCAMPIS) Annual Performance Report** (APR) is available as of January 24, 2024.  The **deadline for submitting APR data is March 1, 2024.**

## Text Documents

                - Instructions and form for Completing the CCAMPIS Annual Performance Report for 2022-23
                - (CCAMPIS) Program State Assignment List
                - 2022-23 CCAMPIS Annual Performance Report Data Survey
                - CCAMPIS APR Form- Blank
                - CCAMPIS APR Letter to Project Directors
                To fill out the form, first download the PDF fillable document to your computer and open it using Adobe Acrobat or Reader to complete the form.

Student Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
EXHIBIT 18.3

LETTER RE:  CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE



Public Service  Company of Oklahoma (PSO) 
Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended March 31, 1999


Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the  requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a  registrant's  independent  accountants  whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

As stated in Note 1 to the  financial  statements  of this Form 10-Q,  effective
January 1, 1999, PSO  incorporated  the five-year  average market related method
(the "Market  Method") in its calculation of pension costs.  Prior to January 1,
1999,  PSO utilized the market value of the pension  assets at September 30th in
its calculation of pension costs. The change was made to minimize the plan asset
market value  volatility  effect on PSO's recorded  pension costs.  Adopting the
Market  Method  did not have a  material  effect  on first  quarter  results  of
operations or financial position. The cumulative effect of the accounting change
to the Market Method was not material to first quarter  results of operations or
financial position.

A complete  coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the  preferability  of  accounting   principles  among  acceptable   alternative
principles  has not been  established  by the  accounting  profession.  Thus, we
cannot  make an  objective  determination  of whether  the change in  accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors,  including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective  basis,  and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the  opinion  that  PSO's  change  in method  of  accounting  is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which based upon the reasons stated
for the  change  and our  discussions  with  you is also  preferable  under  the
circumstances  in this  particular  case. In arriving at this  opinion,  we have
relied on the business  judgement and business  planning of your management.  We
have not audited the  application  of the change to the financial  statements of
any period subsequent to December 31, 1998. Further, we have not examined and do
not express any opinion with respect to your financial  statements for the three
months ended March 31, 1999.


Very Truly Yours

Arthur Andersen LLP
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00606

- CR

Bobby S. ARCE , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR11784 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 23, 2019
DIS MISSED Bobby S. Arce pled nolo contendere to a felony offense pursuant to a plea agreement. As part of his plea

- bargain, Arce signed a separate “Waiver of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal

. ” See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). Arce timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a04

- 19

- 00606

- CR

- 2

- certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.
Th is court gave Arce notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an a mended trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order) (en banc), disp. on merit s , No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Arce’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written response, stating he has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the record and counsel’s response, we agree that Arce does not have a right to appeal.
See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate) . We therefore dismiss this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6540** 

KEITH DELAUN HINTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. MATTHEW DODD, CO/Sec Div. Badge #135 , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Gerald Bruce Lee , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00164

- GBL

- TRJ )

Submitted : November 18, 2010 Decided: November 29, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affi rmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Keith Delaun Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Delaun Hinton appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hinton v. Dodd , No. 1:10

- cv - 00164

- GLB

- TRJ (E.D. Va.
Mar. 22 , 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald Gale, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Erie County Court for a hearing: Memorandum: Only after a hearing may it be decided whether the principles enunciated in *People*v. *Nicholson*(11 N Y 2d 1067) are here applicable. (Appeal from order of Erie County Court denying without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for arson, third degree, rendered October 4, 1960.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
## FY 2023

FY 2023 Appropriation: $12,000,000

- FY 2023 Amount for New Awards: $11,709,310
Funding Down the Slate from the FY 2022 Competition: $1,253,296
New Awards from the FY 2023 Competition: $10,456,014

- Number of New Awards: 6
Funding Down the Slate from the FY 2022 Competition: 1 New Award 
New Awards from the FY 2023 Competition: 5 New Awards

## FY 2022

Appropriation: $11,000,000Total Number of New Awards: 2 Total Number of Supplemental Awards: 9* *To make whole awardees that were partially funded in FY 2021.

## FY 2021

Appropriation: $7,000,000Total Number of New Awards: 9 

## FY 2020

Appropriation: $6,012,195Total Number of New Awards: 4

## FY 2019

Appropriation: $5,000,000Total Number of New Awards: 2

## FY 2018

Appropriation: $4,949,843Total Number of New Awards: 1

FIPSE Home
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-31 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:986
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 148TH DISTRICT COURT of NUECES COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 9th day of

October, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Stephen Forrest Miller, Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00482-CR (Tr.Ct.No. 92-CR-0889-E)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in

accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 13th day of January, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
## FY 2023

Funded Projects: MS Excel (24K) 

## FY 2022

Funded Projects: MS Excel (25K) 

## FY 2021

Funded Projects: MS Excel (25K) 

## FY 2020

Funded Projects: MS Excel (24K) 

## FY 2019

Funded Projects: MS Excel (66K) 

## FY 2018

Funded Projects: MS Excel (20K) 

## FY 2017

Funded Projects: MS Excel (13K) 

## FY 2016

Funded Projects: MS Excel (15K) 

## FY 2015

Funded Projects: MS Excel (38K) | PDF (227K)

## FY 2014

Funded Projects: MS Excel (41K) | PDF (225K)

## FY 2013

Funded Projects: MS Excel (44K) | PDF (243K)

## FY 2012

Funded Projects: MS Excel (37K) | PDF (253K)

## FY 2011

Funded Projects: MS Excel (37K) | PDF (222K)

Student Service Home
# C_2018265EN.01001301.xml

| 27.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 July 2018

(2018/C 265/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1716 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4517 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88860 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2738 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1616 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5455 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,647 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2835 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6318 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,6454 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5792 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5287 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1949 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7186 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5943 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 311,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4559 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9464 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4025 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 935,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7600 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,559 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,8560 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,038 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3523 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,9020 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,4480 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1716

JPY

Japanese yen

129,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4517

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88860

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2738

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1616

ISK

Iceland króna

122,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5455

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,647

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2835

RON

Romanian leu

4,6318

TRY

Turkish lira

5,6454

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5792

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5287

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1949

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7186

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5943

KRW

South Korean won

1 311,82

ZAR

South African rand

15,4559

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9464

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4025

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 935,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7600

PHP

Philippine peso

62,559

RUB

Russian rouble

73,8560

THB

Thai baht

39,038

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3523

MXN

Mexican peso

21,9020

INR

Indian rupee

80,4480

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Timeline

Next competition: FY 2025Application available:  To be determined (for eligible HBCU institutions only)Application deadline: To be determined

Last competition: FY 2022

## Federal Register Notice

                - To be determined 

## Current Application

The Title III, HBCU Programs, Parts B/F, Phase I of the FY 2024 data collection is due date is TBD. Phase II of the FY 2025 application process for the HBCU Programs due date TBD For any questions, please contact Wendy Lawrence, HBCU Program Manager, at wendy.lawrence@ed.gov or 202-453-7821.
                - FY 2024 Phase I Data Worksheet due TBD in 2024 
                - Archived FY 2022 Application Package for HBCU, PART B Program     PDF  (667K)

If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll-free, at 1-800-877-8339.

## Application Contact

Wendy Lawrence, (202) 453-7821HBCU Program ManagerU.S. Department of EducationOffice of Postsecondary EducationHigher Education Programs | Institutional Service | Historically Black Colleges and Universities Division 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., | LBJ-HEP – 5th Floor Washington, D.C. 20202

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov