alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PHILIP G. MAVON, JR. and OMA JEAN MAVON
, Appellant s ,

v.

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE and SCOTT S. LIBERMAN
, Appellee s

.

No s . 4D 20

- 1271 and 4D20

- 1486

[ April 21, 2021 ]

Consolidated nonfinal a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; David A. Haimes , Judge;

L.T. Case No. CACE18

- 28446 (08)

.

Alan R. Poppe of Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Brent M. Reitman of L iberman Cabrera Thompson & Reitman, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Scott S. Liberman.

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellants appeal a nonfinal order granting a temporary injunction that directs them to remove their boat from a boat lift pending trial. We reverse

a nd remand for an evidentiary hearing.

It is well

- settled that the party seeking injunctive relief must establish a factual basis to support the elements of a claim for injunctive relief.

Olson v. Olson , 260 So. 3d 367, 3 6 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) . Thus, appellees, appellants’ neighbors, had to present evidence to establish that: (1) irreparable injury will result if the injunction is not granted ; (2) there is no adequate remedy at law ; (3) the party has a clear legal right to the requested relief ; and (4) the public interest wi ll be served by the temporary injunction. Id. at 368

– 69.

As movants, appellees bore the burden of providing competent, substantial evidence to satisfy each element. SunTrust Banks, Inc. v. Cauthon & McGuigan, PLC , 78 So. 3d 709 , 711 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)

. To support their arguments during the hearings, appellees offered counsel’s2 arguments, administrative rulings regarding the boat lift, and photographs, none of which was sufficient evidence to meet that burden.

See Olson

, 260 So. 3d at 369 (concluding that statements of counsel along

with a verified motio n with attachments were inadequate to establish the requisite proof); see also Tarantola v. Henghold , 254 So. 3d 1110, 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (concluding that screenshots of a website as proof that the website existed on a certain day to support injuncti ve relief were

insufficient where screenshots were not entered into evidence ).

Consequently, we reverse the temporary injunction and remand for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing and if appellee s meet their burden, to enter an order with suffi cient factual findings as required by

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610.

Reversed and remanded.

W ARNER
, G ERBER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### 2104.9001 Contract clause.

The clause at 2152.204-70 of this chapter must be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.

[70 FR 41150, July 18, 2005]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 401 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 401

Designating May 5, 2018 as the ``National Day of Awareness for Missing 
                 and Murdered Native Women and Girls''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2018

    Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Udall, Mr. 
Gardner, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Lankford, Ms. Warren, 
 Mr. Wyden, and Mrs. Murray) submitted the following resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             April 25, 2018

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating May 5, 2018 as the ``National Day of Awareness for Missing 
                 and Murdered Native Women and Girls''.

Whereas, according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some 
        tribal communities, American Indian women face murder rates that are 
        more than 10 times the national average murder rate;
Whereas, according to the most recently available data from the Centers for 
        Disease Control and Prevention, in 2015, homicide--

    (1) ranged from the second to seventh leading cause of death for 
American Indian and Alaska Native females between 1 and 39 years of age; 
and

    (2) remained a leading cause of death for most American Indian and 
Alaska Native females between 40 and 64 years of age;

Whereas little data exist on the number of missing American Indian and Alaska 
        Native women and girls in the United States;
Whereas, on July 5, 2013, Hanna Harris, a member of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe, 
        was reported missing by her family in Lame Deer, Montana;
Whereas the body of Hanna Harris was found 5 days after she went missing;
Whereas Hanna Harris was determined to have been raped and murdered, and the 
        individuals accused of committing those crimes were convicted;
Whereas the case of Hanna Harris is an example of many similar cases; and
Whereas Hanna Harris was born on May 5, 1992: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 5, 2018, as the ``National Day of 
        Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native Women and Girls''; 
        and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups--
                    (A) to commemorate the lives of missing and 
                murdered American Indian and Alaska Native women and 
                girls whose cases are documented and undocumented in 
                public records and the media; and
                    (B) to demonstrate solidarity with the families of 
                the victims in light of those tragedies.
                                 <all>
```
32.503-9 Liquidation rates—alternate method. ( a ) The liquidation rate determined under 32.503-8 shall apply throughout the period of contract performance unless the contracting officer adjusts the liquidation rate under the alternate method in this 32.503-9. The objective of the alternate liquidation rate method is to permit the contractor to retain the earned profit element of the contract prices for completed items in the liquidation process. The contracting officer may reduce the liquidation rate if— ( 1 ) The contractor requests a reduction in the rate;
( 2 ) The rate has not been reduced in the preceding 12 months;
( 3 ) The contract delivery schedule extends at least 18 months from the contract award date;
( 4 ) Data on actual costs are available ( i ) for the products delivered, or
( ii ) if no deliveries have been made, for a performance period of at least 12 months;
( 5 ) The reduced liquidation rate would result in the Government recouping under each invoice the full extent of the progress payments applicable to the costs allocable to that invoice;
( 6 ) The contractor would not be paid for more than the costs of items delivered and accepted (less allocable progress payments) and the earned profit on those items;
( 7 ) The unliquidated progress payments would not exceed the limit prescribed in paragraph (a)(5) of the Progress Payments clause;
( 8 ) The parties agree on an appropriate rate; and
( 9 ) The contractor agrees to certify annually, or more often if requested by the contracting officer, that the alternate rate continues to meet the conditions of subsections 5, 6, and 7 above. The certificate must be accompanied by adequate supporting information.
( b ) The contracting officer shall change the liquidation rate in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) The rate shall be increased for both previous and subsequent transactions, if the contractor experiences a lower profit rate than the rate anticipated at the time the liquidation rate was established. Accordingly, the contracting officer shall adjust the progress payments associated with contract items already delivered, as well as subsequent progress payments.
( 2 ) The rate shall be increased or decreased in keeping with the successive changes to the contract price or target profit when— ( i ) The target profit is changed under a fixed-price incentive contract with successive targets; or
( ii ) A redetermined price involves a change in the profit element under a contract with prospective price redetermination at stated intervals.
( c ) Whenever the liquidation rate is changed, the contracting officer shall issue a contract modification to specify the new rate in the Progress Payments clause. Adequate consideration for these contract modifications is provided by the consideration included in the initial contract. The parties shall promptly make the payment or liquidation required in the circumstances.
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 74 FR 40468, Aug. 11, 2009]
Exhibit 23.

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Wegener Corporation
Duluth, Georgia

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statements (File No. 33-45390,  No. 33-42007,  No. 333-08017,  No. 33-27527, No.
333-29887,  No.  33-51205,  and No.  333-29889) of our reports dated October 19,
2001, relating to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Wegener
Corporation and  Subsidiaries  appearing in the Company's  Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended August 31, 2001.

Atlanta, Georgia                        BDO Seidman, LLP
November 14, 2001
242.7302 Requirements. ( a ) ( 1 ) An in-depth CIPR as described at DFARS 242.7301(a)(1) shall be conducted only when— ( i ) A contractor has $50 million of qualifying sales to the Government during the contractor's preceding fiscal year; and
( ii ) The ACO, with advice from DCMA insurance/pension specialists and DCAA auditors, determines a CIPR is needed based on a risk assessment of the contractor's past experience and current vulnerability.
( 2 ) Qualifying sales are sales for which certified cost or pricing data were required under 10 U.S.C. 3702, as implemented in FAR 15.403, or that are contracts priced on other than a firm-fixed-price or fixed-price with economic price adjustment basis. Sales include prime contracts, subcontracts, and modifications to such contracts and subcontracts.
( b ) A special CIPR that concentrates on specific areas of a contractor's insurance programs, pension plans, or other deferred compensation plans shall be performed for a contractor (including, but not limited to, a contractor meeting the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section) when any of the following circumstances exists, but only if the circumstance(s) may result in a material impact on Government contract costs: ( 1 ) Information or data reveals a deficiency in the contractor's insurance/pension program.
( 2 ) The contractor proposes or implements changes in its insurance, pension, or deferred compensation plans.
( 3 ) The contractor is involved in a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.
( 4 ) The Government needs to follow up on contractor implementation of prior CIPR recommendations.
( c ) The DCAA auditor shall use relevant findings and recommendations of previously performed CIPRs in determining the scope of any audits of insurance and pension costs.
( d ) When a Government organization believes that a review of the contractor's insurance/pension program should be performed, that organization should provide a recommendation for a review to the ACO. If the ACO concurs, the review should be performed as part of an ACO-initiated special CIPR or as part of a CIPR already scheduled for the near future.
[78 FR 13544, Feb. 28, 2013, as amended at 87 FR 76996, Dec. 16, 2022]
#### 3401.604-70 Contract clause.

Contracting officers must insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 3452.201-70 (Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)), in all solicitations and contracts for which a COR will be (or is) appointed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Chattem,
Inc.'s unaudited financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                       775
<INVENTORY>                                     19,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,661
<PP&E>                                          31,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,365
<BONDS>                                        292,358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,098
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   371,792
<SALES>                                        161,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,066
<CGS>                                           44,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,011
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,069
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,859) 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
        

</TABLE>
#### 31.205-31 Plant reconversion costs.

Plant reconversion costs are those incurred in restoring or rehabilitating the contractor's facilities to approximately the same condition existing immediately before the start of the Government contract, fair wear and tear excepted. Reconversion costs are unallowable except for the cost of removing Government property and the restoration or rehabilitation costs caused by such removal. However, in special circumstances where equity so dictates, additional costs may be allowed to the extent agreed upon before costs are incurred. Care should be exercised to avoid duplication through allowance as contingencies, additional profit or fee, or in other contracts.
#### 2945.105 Contractors' property management system compliance.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 10 , 2021

Order 

Clerk

March 10, 2021

162468(64)

RONNIE MOUSSA EL-ACHKAR, 

Plaintiff, 

and

OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., 

PHYSIOMATRIX, INC., GENEX 

PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC., 

ELITE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, PC, 

and PRIME CARE CHIROPRACTIC, PC, 

Intervening-Plaintiffs, 

SC: 162468

v COA: 348380

Wayne CC: 13-005965-NI 

SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., 

Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff- Appellant, 

and

HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

ILLINOIS, 

Defendant, 

and 

HALA BAYDOUN BAZZI and MARIAM 

BAZZI, 

Third-Party Defendants, 

and 

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Appellee.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel 

to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on March 5, 

2021, is accepted for filing.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Organizations and Government Agencies

Disclaimer                - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Administration on Developmental Disabilities
                - U.S. Department of Justice - Disability Rights Section
                -  U.S. Department of Education - Office for Civil Rights
                - Federal Student Aid Eligibility
                - U.S. Department of Education - Federal Student Aid (FSA) Approved Comprehensive Transition and Postsecondary (CTP) Programs
                - ThinkCollege.net

## Other Resources

                - Grantmaking at ED
                - Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Settlements and Consent Agreements

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
229.170-2 Policy. ( a ) By law, bilateral agreements with foreign governments must include a provision that commodities acquired under contracts funded by U.S. assistance programs shall be exempt from taxation by the foreign government. If taxes or customs duties nevertheless are imposed, the foreign government must reimburse the amount of such taxes to the U.S. Government (Section 579 of Division E of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2003 (Pub. L. 108-7), as amended by Section 506 of Division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004 (Pub. L. 108-199), and similar sections in subsequent acts).
( b ) This foreign tax exemption— ( 1 ) Applies to a contract or subcontract for commodities when— ( i ) The funds are appropriated by the annual foreign operations appropriations act; and
( ii ) The value of the contract or subcontract is $500 or more;
( 2 ) Does not apply to the acquisition of services;
( 3 ) Generally is implemented through letters of offer and acceptance, other country-to-country agreements, or Federal interagency agreements; and
( 4 ) Requires reporting of noncompliance for effective implementation.
[70 FR 57192, Sept. 30, 2005]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6540

KEITH DELAUN HINTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW DODD, CO/Sec Div. Badge #135,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:10-cv-00164-GBL-TRJ)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 29, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Delaun Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Delaun Hinton appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Hinton v. Dodd, No. 1:10-cv-00164-GLB-TRJ (E.D. Va. 

Mar. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2015 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 9, 2015 |   | By:  | /s/ Bowen S. Diehl                                  |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |      | Bowen S. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
EXHIBIT 21.1

                        Subsidiaries of ELXSI Corporation

                                                    State or Other
Name of Subsidiary                                  Jurisdiction of Organization
------------------                                  ----------------------------

ELXSI                                               California

Subsidiaries of ELXSI:
   Bickford's Holdings Company, Inc. ("BHC")        Delaware
   Knopofex Ltd.                                    Canada
   Cues B.V.                                        Netherlands
   Cues East LLC                                    Russian Federation

Subsidiary of BHC:
   Bickford's Family Restaurants, Inc. ("BFFI")     Delaware

Subsidiary of BFFI:
   Vermont Bickford's, Inc.                         Vermont