alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex4-5.htm


    Exhibit
4.5

     

    
      PROMISSORY
NOTE

      Roger
Ralston

       

      
        	
                Boca
      Raton, Florida

              	
                $22,000.00

              


      

      June 10,
2009

       

      For value
received, the undersigned DirectView Holdings, Inc.(“Borrower”) with office
Located at 7700 W Camino Real, Suite 403, Boca Raton, FL 33433, promises to pay
to in lawful money of the United States of America or security equivalent to the
order of Roger Ralston, (“Lender”) located at 19576 Saturnia Lakes Dr.,
Boca Raton, FL  33433 or such other
place as the Lender may designate in writing, the principle sum of TWENTY
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($22,000.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of
12.0% per annum. Principal and related interest shall be payable on June 10,
2010

       

      This
Promissory note may be pre-paid in whole or in part at any time prior to the
maturity without premium or penalty of any kind. Borrower may prepay this Note
in cash or other equivalent securities at any time without penalty. If paid in
stock it will be paid at par value per share.

       

      The
Borrower and any endorsers of this note hereby agree to waive demand, notice of
non-payment and protest, and in case suit shall be brought for the collection
hereof or the note has to be collected upon demand of any attorney, to pay
reasonable attorney’s fees for making such collection, and/or attorney’s fees
and costs incurred by Lender, or holders hereof in prosecuting or defending
litigation to effect collection, including costs and attorney’s fees in
appellate courts.

       

      During
the period of any default under the terms of this Note, and from and after
maturity, the interest rate on the entire indebtedness then outstanding shall be
at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. Notwithstanding any provision of
the Note to the contrary, it is expressly agreed that the amounts payable under
this Note in the nature of or which would be considered as interest or other
charge for the use or loan of money shall not exceed the highest rate allowed by
the laws of the State of Florida.

       

      This
Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Florida.

       

      DirectView
Holdings, Inc.

      
        


      

       

      
        By: /s/
Roger Ralston

      

       

      
        Name:
Roger Ralston

      

       

      Title: CEO
#### 215.403 Obtaining certified cost or pricing data.
');
	document.write('

|Program Title | Description | Office
|------------- | ----------- | ------
|
### (AMS

- NOP

- 10

- 0083; NOP

- 10

- 09IR)

Stakeholder c ommunication for the r ecord

Note to Record:

On September 26, 2012, the NOP held a call with the stakeholders listed below to inform them of the publication of an interim rule for Sunset 2012: Nutrient Vitamins and Minerals. Stakeholders were notified that any notes from the call would be placed on the record, including a list of attendees. On this call, the NOP provided an overview of the interim rule and instructed people to submit any comments to Regulations.gov during the 90

- day comment period. Two questions were asked of the NOP

– one question regarding the necessity of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) to review Food and Drug Administration (FDA) GRAS substances such as beta

- carotene as a source of Vitamin A, given that Vitamin A is already allowed unde r USDA organic regulations, the other question regarding the allowance of certain minerals in organic infant formula given this interim rule. The NOP requested that the first question be submitted as a comment; on the second question, the NOP stated that t he status quo remains in effect based on this interim rule (i.e. minerals currently used in organic products continue to be allowed until/unless the agency issues a final rule changing their allowance).

USDA Participants: Miles McEvoy, USDA/NOP

Melissa Bailey, USDA/NOP Lisa Ahramjian, USDA/NOP Jennifer Tucker, USDA/NOP Judy Ragonesi, USDA/NOP Soo Kim, USDA/AMS Public Affairs

Stakeholder Participants: Zareb Herman, Hain Celestial Jillian Rado, Gerber/Nestle Nutrition Sally Keefe, Aurora Dairy
Robert Ran kin, International Formula Council Gwendolyn Ward, Organic Trade Association Richard Theuer, Industry Consultant Will Fantle, The Cornucopia Institute Charlotte Vaelleys, The Cornucopia Institute Troy Aikman, Hain Celestial Beth Unger, Organic Valley/CRO PP Cooperative Kim Dietz, Smuckers Linda Vitale, Abbot Nutrition Allison Smith, Hain Celestial
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

39) ll-K- (B) -27 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 39 of 325 
P.2 

a p 

/•L-_\ r-_ /ry> 

II-K-(B)-27 

TABLES WHICH SUMMARIZE BY BOILER SIZE CATEGORY THE 

FOURTH ROUND REGULATIONS, MODEL RESULTS, AND EEA 

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FIFTH ROUND REGULATIONS. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to A. Wehe, EPArSASD. 

March 10, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-27
### -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.5 39.0 39.5



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/31 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Wyndham International, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and
accompanies this annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Wyndham International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Richard A. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:    March 8, 2004.



/s/    Richard A. SmithName:    Richard A. Smith




Subscribed and sworn to before
me

this 8th day of March 2004.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    Camaleta M. Roseman  
|Name:    Camaleta M. Roseman
|Title:    Notary Public     



My commission expires: 05-24-04



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by
the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)  I, Jonathan N.
Rubin, as Chief Financial Officer of Magellan Health Services, Inc (the Company),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:  (1)the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.  /s/ JONATHAN N. RUBINJonathan N. RubinDate: October 30,
  2009
  Chief Financial Officer  1
Exhibit 10.27


 


WAIVER AND CONSENT UNDER SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


For
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby
confirmed, the undersigned, being the sole Holder under the Securities Purchase
Agreement dated as of January 5, 2009 (as now in effect, the “Securities
Purchase Agreement”), among AGA Medical Corporation (the “Company”),
Amplatzer Medical Sales Corporation, as a Guarantor, and WCAS Capital Partners
IV, L.P. (the “Purchaser”), hereby waives the obligation of the Company
under Section 3.04 of the Securities Purchase Agreement to make a
mandatory prepayment in connection with the consummation of an IPO by Holdings
expected to occur on or around October 26, 2009.  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Securities Purchase
Agreement.


 


This
waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any provision of the Securities
Purchase Agreement not expressly referred to herein and shall not be construed
as waiver of or consent to any further or future action on the part of the
Company that would require a waiver or consent of the Purchaser.  Except as expressly waived hereby, all the
terms, provisions and conditions of the Securities Purchase Agreement are and
shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect.  This waiver shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


 


 


	
  Dated:
  October 20, 2009

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  WCAS
  CAPITAL PARTNERS IV, L.P.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  WCAS CP IV Associates LLC,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  its General Partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Sean Traynor

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  

  	
  Sean
  Traynor

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Managing
  Member
#### In the Matter of Scotia Fey, Petitioner, v James P. Melton, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, of the State of New York, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, dated November 3, 1977, which, after a hearing, suspended petitioner’s motor vehicle operator’s license for a period of 90 days. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Shapiro and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### 3.907-7 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 52.203-15, Whistleblower Protections Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, in all solicitations and contracts funded in whole or in part with Recovery Act funds.

[74 FR 14634, Mar. 31, 2009, as amended at 88 FR 69521, Oct. 5,2023]
#### John Maloney, Plaintiff, v. Harry Landau et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Michael Greene, Respondent, v. Queens Management Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.) Catherine C. Maloney, Respondent, v. Queens Management Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 3.)

—In In three separate negligence actions arising out of the same automobile accident, of which Actions Nos. 1 and 2 had been consolidated for trial in the Supreme Court, Nassau County; Action No. 1 thereafter had been settled and discontinued; and Action No. 3 thereafter had been commenced in the District Court, Nassau County, the Queens Management Corp., one of the defendants in all three actions, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 29, 1964, which denied its motion: (a) to consolidate Action No. 3 with Action No. 2; and (b) thereupon to transfer the said actions, as so consolidated, to the District Court, Nassau County. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The actions are within the jurisdictional limits of the District Court of Nassau County, and the Supreme Court has the power: (a) to remove Action No. 3 to itself and to consolidate it with Action No. 2, pursuant to CPLR 602; and (b) to transfer the actions as thus consolidated to the District Court of Nassau County (N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 19). There being no reason shown in the record why such relief should be withheld, defendant’s motion should have been granted. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 2808.802 Policy.

The Director, Facilities and Administrative Services Staff (FASS), JMD, has been designated to serve as the central printing authority for the DOJ, for purposes of FAR 8.802(b).
# C_2018466EN.01002001.xml

| 28.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/20

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 466/11)

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Luxembourg

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country
  : Luxembourg

Subject of commemoration
  : The 100th anniversary of the accession to the throne of Grand Duchess Charlotte

Description of the design
  : The design shows on the left hand the effigy of His Royal Highness, the Grand Duke Henri, and on the right hand the effigy of the Grand Duchess Charlotte. At the bottom is the name of the issuing country ‘LUXEMBOURG’ and underneath the year of issuance ‘2019’. At the top, in semi-circle around the effigies is the inscription ‘Centenaire de l’accession au trône de la Grande-Duchesse Charlotte’ (Centenary of the accession to the throne of Grand Duchess Charlotte).

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
  :

Date of issue
  : January 2019

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
# C_2017152EN.01000101.xml

| 16.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8455 — STRABAG/Rohöl-Aufsuchungs AG/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 152/01)

On 5 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8455. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8455. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6931

CHRISTOPHER CARTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LESLIE M. MCCANN, Assistant Commonwealth,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-831-7)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 23, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Carter, a Virginia inmate, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Carter has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.44

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     Agreement dated as of December 18, 2001, between US Airways, Inc., a Delaware corporation, having a place of business at Crystal Park Four, 2345 Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22227 (the "Company") and Lawrence M. Nagin, residing at 3405 "O" Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20007 (the "Executive").

W I T N E S S E T H

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have entered into that certain employment agreement dated February 6, 1996 (the "Original Agreement"), and the parties hereto desire to amend, restate and replace the Original Agreement with this Agreement; 

     WHEREAS, the Executive has assumed duties of a responsible nature to the benefit of the Company and to the satisfaction of its Board of Directors (the "Board");

     WHEREAS, the Board believes it to be in the best interests of the Company to enter into this Agreement to assure Executive's continuing services to the Company including, but not limited to, under circumstances in which there is a possible, threatened or actual Change of Control (as defined below) of the Company; and

     WHEREAS, the Board believes it is imperative to diminish the inevitable distraction of the Executive by virtue of the personal uncertainties and 

1

risks created by a pending or threatened Change of Control and to encourage the Executive's full attention and dedication to the Company currently and in the event of any threatened or pending Change of Control, and to provide the Executive with compensation and benefits arrangements upon a Change of Control which ensure that the compensation and benefits expectations of the Executive will be satisfied and which are competitive with those of other corporations. Therefore, in order to accomplish all the above objectives, the Board has caused the Company to enter into this Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:

                 1. Certain Definitions.
Exhibit 10.33



FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SEVERANCE AGREEMENT



This First
Amendment, dated as of March 31, 2003, to the Severance Agreement dated April 8, 2002, between US Airways, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Jerrold A. Glass (the Executive) is entered into as of the date first
stated above.



WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have
previously entered into the Agreement; and



WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.



NOW THEREFORE, the following amendments are hereby made to the Agreement:



1. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following language at the end thereof:



Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2, no
Change of Control or Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred in connection with transactions under the Retirement Systems of Alabama investment agreement dated September 26, 2002, as amended, or in connection with
the Companys emergence from bankruptcy.



2. Section
5(d)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended by substituting ; or for , and at the end of Section 5(d)(i)(4), and by the addition of the following as Section 4(d)(i)(5):



| | (5) |  | any relocation of the Companys corporate headquarters outside of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area; and.
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

3. Section 5(d)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby amended by substituting ; or for the period at
the end of Section 5(d)(ii)(5), and by the addition of the following as Section 5(d)(ii)(6):



| | (6) |  | any relocation of the Companys corporate headquarters outside of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



EXECUTIVEJerrold A. GlassUS AIRWAYS, INC.ByName:

Jennifer C. McGareyTitle:

Vice President, Deputy General Counsel & Secretary