alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019188EN.01000201.xml

| 4.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 June 2019

Euro exchange rates (2)

3 June 2019

(2019/C 188/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1185 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4680 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88618 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6180 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1162 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7778 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,832 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2833 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7377 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5815 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6077 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5098 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7645 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7040 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5328 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 323,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2910 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7253 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4180 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 925,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6742 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,012 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,1315 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,138 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3847 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1130 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,4720 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1185

JPY

Japanese yen

121,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4680

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88618

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6180

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1162

ISK

Iceland króna

138,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7778

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,832

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2833

RON

Romanian leu

4,7377

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5815

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6077

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5098

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7645

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7040

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5328

KRW

South Korean won

1 323,45

ZAR

South African rand

16,2910

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7253

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4180

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 925,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6742

PHP

Philippine peso

58,012

RUB

Russian rouble

73,1315

THB

Thai baht

35,138

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3847

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1130

INR

Indian rupee

77,4720

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2017376EN.01000701.xml

| 8.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/7

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals under the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020: ‘Blending’ call (Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 7360 amending Implementing Decision C(2017) 164 of 20 January 2017)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 41 of 8 February 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 41 of 8 February 2017

(2017/C 376/05)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, is announcing a corrigendum to the call for proposals (CEF-Transport-Blending-2017 (General envelope) in order to award grants in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector, as published in the Official Journal (2017/C 41/04).

The corrigendum to the call for proposals is available on:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-transport/apply-funding/2017-cef-transport-blending-map-call

---
#### Troy DOUSE, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GLOBAL PIPELINES PLUS, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 06-30737.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 1, 2007.

James Edmon Cazalot, Jr., Law Offices of H. Edward Sherman, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Harvey Lebas, Law Office of Henry Lebas, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff Troy Douse is a Jones Act seaman employed by Defendant Energy Catering; Douse worked as a bedroom/galley hand on vessels owned and operated by Defendant Global Pipelines. Having been injured in transport between two vessels, Douse filed suit for maintenance and cure against Energy Catering and for negligence against Global Pipelines. In a bench trial, the district court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, finding that he was entitled to maintenance and cure through the present, future maintenance and cure, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future economic losses. Defendants appeal the future economic losses award, the future medical expenses award, the past and future maintenance awards, and the past and future pain and suffering awards. They also seek a reduction of the lost wages and medical expense awards, as well as the award of prejudgment interest.

“The standard of review for a bench trial is well established: findings of fact are reviewed for clear error and legal issues are reviewed *de novo.” Water Craft Mgmt. LLC v. Mercury Marine,*457 F.3d 484, 488 (5th Cir.2006) (quoting *In re Mid-South Towing Co.,*418 F.3d 526, 531 (5th Cir.2005)); *see also*Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). Damage awards are considered factual issues subject to the clear error standard. *Employers Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Chaddrick,*826 F.2d 381, 386 (5th Cir.1987).

Having considered the oral and written arguments of the parties, as well as the evidence of record, we conclude that the district court’s decision was not affected by any error of law or clear error of fact. *343Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000057 03-MAY-2017 08:13 AM
#### Leo H. Garber v. Philip Mandelbaum et al. (Two Actions.)

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before May 23, 1962, with notice of argument for the June 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Respondent’s points are to be served and filed on or before June 6, 1962. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

For press  releases on this and other IFLE programs, go to the IFLE Press Releases page.

## FY 2023

                - No awards.

## FY 2022

                - Google Map of FY 2022 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2021

                - List of Grantees and Funding Amounts:    PDF  (621K)

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 This THIRD
Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 29, 2008, by and between BANK OF THE WEST (the “Bank”) and DIEDRICH COFFEE, INC. (the “Borrower”) with respect to the
following: 
 This Amendment shall be deemed to be a part of and subject to that certain Credit Agreement dated as of
November 4, 2005, as it may be amended from time to time, and any and all addenda and riders thereto (collectively the “Agreement”). Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meanings
as in the Agreement. To the extent that any of the terms or provisions of this Amendment conflict with those contained in the Agreement, the terms and provisions contained herein shall control. 
 WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Bank mutually desire to extend and/or modify the Agreement. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for value received and hereby acknowledged, the Borrower and the Bank agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Extension of Expiration Date. The Expiration Date provided for in Section 1.1.8 of the Agreement shall be extended to October 15, 2009.


  

	2.	Representations and Warranties. The Borrower hereby reaffirms the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement and represents that no event, which
with notice or lapse of time, could become an Event of Default, has occurred or is continuing. 

  

	3.	Confirmation of Other Terms and Conditions of the Agreement. Except as specifically provided in this Amendment, all other terms, conditions and covenants of the
Agreement unaffected by this Amendment shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect and the Borrower hereby covenants and agrees to perform and observe all terms, covenants and agreements provided for in the Agreement, as
hereby amended. 

  

	4.	Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California to which jurisdiction the parties hereto
hereby consent and submit. 

  

	5.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto as of
the date first hereinabove written. 
  

									
	BANK	 		 	BORROWER
			
	BANK OF THE WEST	 		 	DIEDRICH COFFEE, INC.
					
	BY:	 	/s/ Bruce Young	 		 	BY:	 	/s/ Sean McCarthy
	NAME:	 	Bruce Young, Vice President	 		 	NAME:	 	Sean McCarthy CFO
			
		 		 	ADDRESS:
			
		 		 	 28 Executive Park, Suite 200
 Irvine, CA 92614
# C_2017148EN.01000401.xml

| 12.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 May 2017

(2017/C 148/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0860 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4401 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84485 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6478 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0952 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3330 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,598 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,57 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2242 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8921 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4737 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4906 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4594 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5862 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5292 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 225,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5157 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4957 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 490,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7225 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,176 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,0650 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,740 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4363 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6050 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0860

JPY

Japanese yen

123,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4401

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84485

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6478

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0952

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3330

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,598

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,57

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2242

RON

Romanian leu

4,5490

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8921

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4737

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4906

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4594

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5862

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5292

KRW

South Korean won

1 225,56

ZAR

South African rand

14,5157

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4957

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 490,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7225

PHP

Philippine peso

54,176

RUB

Russian rouble

62,0650

THB

Thai baht

37,740

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4363

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6050

INR

Indian rupee

69,9060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Andres FLORES-HOLGUIN, also known as Jose Andres Flores, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50509

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert J. Perez, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Andres Flores-Holguin raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# C_2019309EN.01000801.xml

| 13.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 September 2019

(2019/C 309/08)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0963 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,14 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4622 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88920 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6315 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0892 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,30 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8543 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,824 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 330,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3304 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7348 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,2075 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5943 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4468 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5826 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7032 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5091 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 296,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9936 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7702 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3928 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 310,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5664 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,912 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,2200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,334 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4402 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2945 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,9980 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0963

JPY

Japanese yen

118,14

DKK

Danish krone

7,4622

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88920

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6315

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0892

ISK

Iceland króna

138,30

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8543

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,824

HUF

Hungarian forint

330,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3304

RON

Romanian leu

4,7348

TRY

Turkish lira

6,2075

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5943

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4468

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5826

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7032

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5091

KRW

South Korean won

1 296,86

ZAR

South African rand

15,9936

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7702

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3928

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 310,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5664

PHP

Philippine peso

56,912

RUB

Russian rouble

71,2200

THB

Thai baht

33,334

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4402

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2945

INR

Indian rupee

77,9980

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 2532.403 Applicability.

Advance payments may be made in any amount not exceeding the contract price, provided (a) the amount of the advance payment is based upon an analysis of the financing required by the contractor for the contract and does not exceed reasonable financial requirements between payments, and (b) such advance payment is appropriate in order to contract for the required work.
#### 225.7305 Limitation of liability.

Advise the contractor when the foreign customer will assume the risk for loss or damage under the appropriate limitation of liability clause(s) (see FAR Subpart 46.8). Consider the costs of necessary insurance, if any, obtained by the contractor to cover the risk of loss or damage in establishing the FMS contract price.

[56 FR 36367, July 31, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 15633, Mar. 31, 2003]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CARLTON GARY, DOC #234831, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3721

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Carlton Gary, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and LUCAS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Predominantly Black Institutions (PBI) Program

Competitive Grants 

FY 2021 New Awards

State Institution FY 2021

New Award Amount

AL University of West Alabama $592,822.00 

AL Faulkner University $600,000.00 

AR Arkansas State University Mid-South $599,992.00 

GA Augusta Technical College $599,962.00 

GA Georgia State University $600,000.00 

GA South Georgia Technical College $600,000.00 

GA Clayton State University $600,000.00 

GA Central Georgia Technical College $599,637.00 

GA Oconee Fall Line Technical College $599,157.00 

GA Albany Technical College $563,307.00 

GA Southern Crescent Technical College $164,882.00 

GA Atlanta Technical College $544,800.00 

IL Chicago State University $587,729.00 

MS Southwest Mississippi Community College $592,031.00 

NJ Bloomfield College $600,000.00 

NY Medgar Evers College $600,000.00 

PA Peirce College $522,907.00 

PA Community College of Philadelphia $600,000.00 

SC Central Carolina Technical College $598,230.00 

SC Florence-Darlington Technical College $599,564.00 

TN Southwest Tennessee Community College $600,000.00 

TN Baptist Health Sciences University $600,000.00 

Total Allocation $12,565,020.00
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>

<S>                                                                                         <C>    
      MPSI Systems Limited........................................................................U.K. Corporation
      MPSI Australia Pty. Ltd................................................................Australia Corporation
      MPSI do Brasil............................................................................Brazil Corporation
      MPSI Systems K.K........................................................................Japanese Corporation
      MPSI Systems Pte. Ltd..................................................................Singapore Corporation
      Shanghai MPSI Software Inc...............................................................Chinese Corporation
      Management Planning Systems, Inc........................................................Oklahoma Corporation

      INACTIVE CORPORATIONS
      MPSI China Inc..........................................................................Delaware Corporation
      MPSI Surveys Inc........................................................................Oklahoma Corporation
      MPSI Systems Canada Inc.................................................................Canadian Corporation
      MPSI Systems GmbH.........................................................................German Corporation
      MPSI Systems SARL.........................................................................French Corporation
      Quest Systems International Inc.........................................................Delaware Corporation

      BRANCH OFFICES
         Seoul, South Korea.......................................................Branch of MPSI Systems Pte. Ltd.
         Johannesburg, South Africa.....................................Branch of Management Planning Systems Inc.
                                                                                (d/b/a MPSI Africa Inc.)

</TABLE>
237.101 Definitions. *Increased performance of security-guard functions,* as used in this subpart, means— ( 1 ) In the case of an installation or facility where no security-guard functions were performed as of September 10, 2001, the entire scope or extent of the performance of security-guard functions at the installation or facility after such date; and
( 2 ) In the case of an installation or facility where security-guard functions were performed within a lesser scope of requirements or to a lesser extent as of September 10, 2001, than after such date, the increment of the performance of security-guard functions at the installation or facility that exceeds such lesser scope of requirements or extent of performance.
*Senior mentor* means a retired flag, general, or other military officer or retired senior civilian official who provides expert experience-based mentoring, teaching, training, advice, and recommendations to senior military officers, staff, and students as they participate in war games, warfighting courses, operational planning, operational exercises, and decision-making exercises.
[68 FR 7443, Feb. 14, 2003, as amended at 75 FR 71564, Nov. 24, 2010]