alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
228.102-1 General. The requirement for performance and payment bonds is waived for cost-reimbursement contracts. However, for cost-type contracts with fixed-price construction subcontracts over $40,000, require the prime contractor to obtain from each of its construction subcontractors performance and payment protections in favor of the prime contractor as follows: ( 1 ) For fixed-price construction subcontracts over $40,000, but not exceeding $150,000, payment protection sufficient to pay labor and material costs, using any of the alternatives listed at FAR 28.102-1(b)(1).
( 2 ) For fixed-price construction subcontracts over $150,000— ( i ) A payment bond sufficient to pay labor and material costs; and
( ii ) A performance bond in an equal amount if available at no additional cost.
[68 FR 36945, June 20, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 75892, Dec. 19, 2006; 75 FR 45074, Aug. 2, 2010; 80 FR 36904, June 26, 2015; 85 FR 61504, Sept. 29, 2020]
exv10w8







Form
of 

AMENDMENT

TO THE

GM OFFSHORE, INC.

EXECUTIVE NONQUALIFIED EXCESS PLAN




     THIS AGREEMENT by GM Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),



W I T N E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, the Company previously adopted the Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan (the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14 of the Plan, the Company has the right to amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;



     NOW,
THEREFORE, effective October 14, 2009, Section 2.5 of the Executive Nonqualified Excess
Plan Plan Document is completely amended and restated to provide as follows:




2.5 “Change in Control Event” means the occurrence of a “Change in Control Event”
within the meaning of section 1.409A-3(i)(5) of the Department of Treasury
regulations with respect to GulfMark Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or its
successor by merger.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this
Agreement effective as of October 14, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	GM OFFSHORE, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Date:
	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 







- 2 -
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>
                          BIOGEN, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

(in thousands, except per share amounts)


<CAPTION>
                                    1996       1995      1994
                                   -------   -------   -------

<S>                                <C>       <C>       <C>     
Primary earnings(loss) per share

Weighted average number of
 shares outstanding ............    71,595    67,950    65,548
Shares deemed outstanding from
 the assumed exercise of stock
 options and warrants ..........     1,626     4,940      --
                                   -------   -------   -------
Total ..........................    73,221    72,890    65,548
                                   =======   =======   =======

Net income (loss) ..............   $40,530   $ 5,660   $(4,897)
                                   =======   =======   =======

Primary earnings (loss) per
 Share of common stock .........   $  0.55   $  0.08   $ (0.07)
                                   =======   =======   =======

Fully diluted earnings (loss)
  per share (a)

Weighted average number of
 shares ........................    71,595    67,950    65,548
Shares deemed outstanding from
 the assumed exercise of stock
 options and warrants ..........     1,998     5,569      --
                                   -------   -------   -------

Total ..........................    73,593    73,519    65,548
                                   =======   =======   =======

Net income (loss) ..............   $40,530   $ 5,660   $(4,897)
                                   =======   =======   =======

Fully diluted earnings(loss)
per share of common stock ......   $  0.55   $  0.08   $ (0.07)
                                   =======   =======   =======

</TABLE>

(a) This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
601(b)(11) although not required by Footnote 2 to Paragraph 14 of APB Opinion
No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
#### S. H. Equities, Inc., v. Latin Artists Union.

Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Arthur A. Wannamaker, Appellant, v. Walter M. Wallace, as Warden of Wallkill State Prison, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31(a)


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, Haim Aviv, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pharmos Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervison, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the regstrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.


/s/  HAIM AVIV
-------------------------
Haim Aviv
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 15, 2004





                                      II-7
#### Christien Holmboe, Respondent, v. Albert Muench, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 7, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference in trial pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
The Alabama Department of Education (ALDOE) submitted an agreement to resolve a compliance review that OCR initiated focusing on whether the District was discriminating on the basis of disability by failing to ensure that students with disabilities who were transported by bus on special education routes received a shortened school day,  based on the district’s transportation schedule.  ALDOE’s Department of Pupil Transportation is responsible for managing a statewide comprehensive student transportation program including school bus inspection, fleet renewal, driver education programs, training and certification of school bus drivers, technical assistance,  monitoring and evaluation of state and local operations, and oversight of the provisions of special needs transportation. 

Transportation of a student with a disability should not be provided in a manner that results in the student having a shorter school day than his or her nondisabled peers unless there has been a determination, through a process that comports with Section 504, that a shortened school day is necessary to meet the student’s  individual needs.  The Title II  implementing regulation is interpreted consistently with the standards set  forth in the regulation implementing Section 504.

Prior to the conclusion of the investigation, ALDOE entered into a voluntary resolution agreement.  Under the terms of the agreement ALDOE will develop state-wide standards for ensuring that students who are transported on special education routes are not subjected to a shortened school day, unless required in an IEP, because of a district’s  transportation schedule.  ALDOE will disseminate the revised transportation policies and procedures to all district administrators, transportation staff, and special education staff at all schools within each of the State’s 132 school districts.  In addition, ALDOE will conduct an audit of the transportation schedules of all un-reviewed districts in the state and  require immediate corrective action on the part of those found to be in  violation.  ALDOE will require each  district within the state to develop a system to track special education bus routes for each elementary, middle and high school to ensure that students who are transported on special education routes and who are not on IEPs that require a shortened school day are provided with a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) including receiving the benefit of the State’s mandated minimum  instructional time.  ALDOE will conduct state-wide monitoring of the district’s tracking systems on a periodic basis.  Finally, ALDOE will provide  training to district administrators, transportation directors, Section 504 coordinators, and special education coordinators on the revisions of ALDOE’s transportation policies and procedures.
***Read the Resolution Letter***PDF (238K) | ***Read the Compliance Agreement***PDF (122K)
Top  Last Modified: 01/15/2020
Exhibit 10.14.1





Exhibit 10.14.1





			
	
	 	 





July 17, 2007



To:     

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. Lender Group


From: 


Jennifer Zhang



Re:     
Notice of Effectiveness



Ladies and Gentlemen:



This letter is to inform you that we have received 100% consent from the lenders participating
in the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2006, among Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc.,
Schweitzer-Mauduit France S.A.R.L and Schweitzer-Mauduit Enterprises S.A.S, certain financial
institutions listed therein and Societe Generale, as Administrative Agent (the “Facility”) agreeing
to extend the maturity date of the Facility to July 31, 2012.





Should you have any questions, please call Jennifer Zhang at (212) 278-6026.




Societe Generale

1221 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10020
```

[111th Congress Public Law 180]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 1265]]

Public Law 111-180
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    109 Main Street in Swifton, Arkansas, as the ``George Kell Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: June 9, 2010 -  [H.R. 3634]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. GEORGE KELL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 109 Main Street in Swifton, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George Kell Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George Kell 
Post Office''.

    Approved June 9, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3634:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 155 (2009):
                                    Dec. 1, 2, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 156 (2010):
                                    May 25, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2017251EN.01000101.xml

| 2.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 August 2017

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 August 2017

(2017/C 251/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1812 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5563 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1414 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3343 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,132 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,60 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2563 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5596 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1602 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4813 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4737 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2284 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5813 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6042 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 325,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,6922 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9371 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4090 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 738,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0620 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,508 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,1750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,322 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6880 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0023 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,7145 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1812

JPY

Japanese yen

130,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89440

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5563

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1414

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3343

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,132

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,60

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2563

RON

Romanian leu

4,5596

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1602

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4813

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4737

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2284

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5813

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6042

KRW

South Korean won

1 325,50

ZAR

South African rand

15,6922

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9371

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4090

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 738,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0620

PHP

Philippine peso

59,508

RUB

Russian rouble

71,1750

THB

Thai baht

39,322

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6880

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0023

INR

Indian rupee

75,7145

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
# C_2019183EN.01000301.xml

| 28.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 May 2019

(2019/C 183/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1198 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4688 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88225 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7148 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1257 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7523 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,834 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 325,75 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2935 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7604 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,7670 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6168 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5061 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7899 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7107 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5393 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 326,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1888 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7254 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4230 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 102,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6880 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,466 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,1850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,643 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4905 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3291 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,8585 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1198

JPY

Japanese yen

122,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4688

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88225

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7148

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1257

ISK

Iceland króna

138,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7523

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,834

HUF

Hungarian forint

325,75

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2935

RON

Romanian leu

4,7604

TRY

Turkish lira

6,7670

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6168

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5061

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7899

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7107

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5393

KRW

South Korean won

1 326,85

ZAR

South African rand

16,1888

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7254

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4230

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 102,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6880

PHP

Philippine peso

58,466

RUB

Russian rouble

72,1850

THB

Thai baht

35,643

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4905

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3291

INR

Indian rupee

77,8585

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
239.7406 Certified cost or pricing data and data other than certified cost or pricing data. ( a ) Common carriers are not required to submit certified cost or pricing data before award of contracts for tariffed services. Rates or preliminary estimates quoted by a common carrier for tariffed telecommunications services are considered to be prices set by regulation within the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 3703. This is true even if the tariff is set after execution of the contract.
( b ) Rates or preliminary estimates quoted by a common carrier for nontariffed telecommunications services or by a noncommon carrier for any telecommunications service are not considered prices set by law or regulation.
( c ) Contracting officers shall obtain sufficient data to determine that the prices are reasonable in accordance with FAR 15.403-3 or 15.403-4. See *PGI 239.7406* for examples of instances where additional data may be necessary to determine price reasonableness.
[77 FR 76940, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 87 FR 76996, Dec. 16, 2022]
');
	document.write('

Color photoSmall

Color photoLarge

Color photoPrint quality

Black and white photoSmall

Black and white photoLarge

Black and white photoPrint quality

For additional photos, visit the Press Room's photo area.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                                                      
| |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Roger H. Ballou
| |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Roger H. Ballou
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 6, 2010



| |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                                       
| |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark A. Kerschner
| |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Mark A. Kerschner
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 6, 2010

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# SIPFunded19
**Contact**Joanne Bogart Joanne.Bogart@ed.gov  Kathy AxtKathy.Axt@ed.gov

The Paperwork Reduction Act requires all federal agencies to obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before collecting information from ten or more respondents outside the federal government. Information collections include questionnaires, focus groups, telephone surveys, applications, performance reports, customer satisfaction surveys, studies and evaluations, interviews, forms, and any other means of requesting information.

The Department of Education accepts comments on pending information collection requests (ICRs) through regulations.gov and www.reginfo.gov. Both sites improve the public's access to participate in the public comment process for rulemaking, ICRs and other types of notices, by providing electronic locations to search, retrieve, and read all related material. Through the sites, the public can view a description of information collection requests currently open for comment, read the full text of these documents and any supporting documents, and submit comments to the appropriate Federal Agency. The public can read comments submitted during the public comment period and can respond to those comments. For ICRs pending under the 60-day comment period, the public may visit www.regulations.gov to view documents and provide comments.  For ICRs pending under the 30-day comment period at OMB, ICRs concluded by OMB within 30 days, and active information collections, the public may visit www.reginfo.gov.

For more information on Regulations.gov, click on the following links to get an overview of the system and to view FAQs. Information on reginfo.gov can be obtained here.