alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 294 

Congratulating the Minnesota Lynx women’s basketball team on winning 

the 2017 Women’s National Basketball Association championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2017 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. FRANKEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Minnesota Lynx women’s basketball team 

on winning the 2017 Women’s National Basketball Association championship. 

Whereas, on October 4, 2017, the Minnesota Lynx won the 

2017 Women’s National Basketball Association (referred 

to in this preamble as the ‘‘WNBA’’) championship; 

Whereas this is the fourth national championship that the 

Minnesota Lynx have won in 7 years; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx beat the Los Angeles Sparks in 

game 5 of the WNBA Conference Finals and bested the 

Washington Mystics in the semifinals; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx finished the regular season with 

the best record, 27–7, and earned the top seed; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 294 IS 

Whereas the 2017 WNBA Finals made ESPN history by becoming the third-most viewed championship series, averaging 559,000 viewers for the 5-game series; 

Whereas attendance for this postseason rose to a high of 

9,596 spectators per game, making it the highest-attended WNBA Finals in 7 years, and attracting 10 percent more spectators as compared to last season; 

Whereas 14,632 fans attended the sold-out championship 

game at Williams Arena, known as ‘‘The Barn’’, in Minneapolis to cheer on the Minnesota Lynx; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx benefit from the stellar coaching leadership of Head Coach Cheryl Reeve and Assistant 

Coaches Shelley Patterson, James Wade, and Walt Hopkins; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx feature 4 world champion and 

gold medal athletes, including Lindsay Whalen, Maya 

Moore, Seimone Augustus, and Sylvia Fowles, as well as 

highly talented professional athletes, including Rebekkah 

Brunson, Renee Montgomery, Temi Fagbenle, Natasha 

Howard, Alexis Jones, Jia Perkins, Plenette Pierson, and 

Cecilia Zandalasini; 

Whereas Sylvia Fowles received the 2017 WNBA Finals Most 

Valuable Player award; 

Whereas Rebekkah Brunson is the first WNBA player to win 

5 championships; and 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx join the Houston Comets as the 

only team to win 4 championships, all under the coaching 

of Head Coach Cheryl Reeve: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 294 IS 

1 (1) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

2 coaches, fans, and staff whose dedication has helped 

3 the Minnesota Lynx win the 2017 Women’s National 

4 Basketball Association championship; and 

5 (2) recognizes the Twin Cities area and the 

6 State of Minnesota for the enthusiastic support of 

7 women’s professional basketball. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 2 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. RUBIO, 

Mr. LEE, and Mr. PERDUE) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to limiting the number of terms that 

a Member of Congress may serve. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 by the Congress: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 2 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has served 3 terms as 

3 a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House 

4 of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the elec5 tion of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Rep6 resentatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 

7 the number of terms that such person has served as a Rep8 resentative if the person fills the vacancy for more than 

9 1 year. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has served 2 terms as 

11 a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to 

12 the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election or 

13 appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate 

14 shall be included as 1 term in determining the number 

15 of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the 

16 person fills the vacancy for more than 3 years. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. No term beginning before the date of 

18 the ratification of this article shall be taken into account 

19 in determining eligibility for election or appointment under 

20 this article.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

Eligible applicants include:
                  -  institutions of higher education (IHEs), 
                  - local education agencies (LEAs), 
                  - nonprofit organizations, 
                  - state education agencies (SEAs), and 
                  - other organizations and/or agencies.

In addition to the categories above, public charter schools that are LEAs under state law, other public agencies, private nonprofit organizations, for-profit organizations, outlying areas (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), freely associated states, and Indian tribes or tribal organizations. 

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
GRAND-DUCH E D E LUXEMBOUR G

DIRECTIO N D E L'AVIATIO N CIVILE-., , 

### ^-:-RTMEN TO F ^^SPORWIO N •= TOPERATION S ^: P 2 0^ ^

Luxembourg , 0 9 SEP
. 201 1 6. ^ J c . Referenc e 2011-674 6 Correspondent : Te l e-mai l Mr
. Charle s KLEI N (+352)247-7491 6 charles.klein@av.etat.l u OFFIC E O FINTERNATIONA L AVIATIO N - U S DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N c/o
. Mr
. Pau l GRETC H Directo r 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S E WASHINGTO N D C 2059 0 Y/ref : Subjec t Att
. : Charte rOperation s betwee n th e Grand-Duch yo fLuxembour g an d

th e Unite d State s o fAmeric a
Dea rMr
. Gretch , Thi s lette ri s t o confir m tha tth e Luxembour g Government , o n th e basi s o f reciprocity , wil l approv e request s fro m US-designate d airline s t o perfor m fifth , sixt h an d sevent h freedo m charte roperation s o n th e understandin g tha tth e U S Governmen twil l approv e simila rrequest s fro m Luxembourg-designate d airlines
. Your s sincerely
. Fo rth e Directo ro fCivi l Aviation ,

larle g KLEI N Counsello r

Postaddres s Offic e addres s Telephon e Fax Websit e e-mai l BoTt e postal e 28 3 L-201 2 Luxembour g 672 , ru e d e Neudorf

L-222 0 Luxembour g (+352)24 77490 0 (+352)4 6 7 7 9 0 www.dac.l u civllair@av.etat.l u
3.1106 Contract clause. ( a ) Insert the clause at 52.203-16, Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest, in solicitations and contracts that— ( 1 ) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and
( 2 ) Include a requirement for services by contractor employee(s) that involve performance of acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions for, or on behalf of, a Federal agency or department.
( b ) If only a portion of a contract is for the performance of acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions, then the contracting officer shall still insert the clause, but shall limit applicability of the clause to that portion of the contract that is for the performance of such services.
( c ) Do not insert the clause in solicitations or contracts with a self-employed individual if the acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions are to be performed entirely by the self-employed individual, rather than an employee of the contractor.
September 18, 2015

Mr. Brian Allred

970 South Main

Mapleton, UT 84664

Dear Mr. Allred:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23(b), 61.3, 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) 

and (b), 91.205(b), 91.215, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a) and (b), and part 

21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process 

your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We posted your exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2712, on July 2, 2015, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
32.402 General. ( a ) A limitation on authority to grant advance payments under Pub. L. 85-804 (50 U.S.C. 1431-1435) is described at 50.102-3(b)(4).
( b ) Advance payments may be provided on any type of contract; however, the agency shall authorize advance payments sparingly. Except for the contracts described in 32.403(a) and (b), advance payment is the least preferred method of contract financing (see 32.106) and generally they should not be authorized if other types of financing are reasonably available to the contractor in adequate amounts. Loans and credit at excessive interest rates or other exorbitant charges, or loans from other Government agencies, are not considered reasonably available financing.
( c ) If statutory requirements and standards for advance payment determinations are met, the contracting officer shall generally recommend that the agency authorize advance payments. ( 1 ) The statutory requirements are that— ( i ) The contractor gives adequate security;
( ii ) The advance payments will not exceed the unpaid contract price (see 32.410(b), subparagraph (a)(2)); and
( iii ) The agency head or designee determines, based on written findings, that the advance payment— ( A ) Is in the public interest (under 32.401(a) or (b)); or
( B ) Facilitates the national defense (under 32.401(c)).
( 2 ) The standards for advance payment determinations are that— ( i ) The advance payments will not exceed the contractor's interim cash needs based on— ( A ) Analysis of the cash flow required for contract performance;
( B ) Consideration of the reimbursement or other payment cycle; and
( C ) To the extent possible, employment of the contractor's own working capital;
( ii ) The advance payments are necessary to supplement other funds or credit available to a contractor;
( iii ) The recipient is otherwise qualified as a responsible contractor;
( iv ) The Government will benefit from performance prospects or there are other practical advantages; and
( v ) The case fits one or more of the categories described in 32.403.
( d ) If necessary, the agency may authorize advance payments in addition to progress or partial payments on the same contract (see 32.501-1(c)).
( e ) Each agency that provides advance payments shall— ( 1 ) Place the responsibility for making findings and determinations, and for approval of contract terms concerning advance payments (see 32.410), at an organizational level high enough to ensure uniform application of this subpart (see the limitation at 50.102-1(b) which also applies to advance payments authorized under Pub. L. 85-804 (50 U.S.C. 1431-1435)); and
( 2 ) Establish procedures for coordination, before advance payment authorization, with the activity that provides contract financing support.
( f ) If the contract provides for advance payments under Pub. L. 85-804, the contracting officer shall ensure conformance with the requirements of 50.103-7.
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 59 FR 67047, Dec. 28, 1994; 72 FR 63030, Nov. 7, 2007]
#### 352.211-1 Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities.

As prescribed in HHSAR 311.7102, the Contracting Officer shall insert the following clause:

# Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities (DEC 2015)

The Contractor agrees as follows:

(a) Except for ad hoc meetings necessary or incidental to contract performance, the Contractor shall develop a plan to assure that any event held pursuant to this contract will meet or exceed the minimum accessibility standards set forth in 28 CFR part 36—Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities. The Contractor shall submit the plan to the Contracting Officer and must receive approval prior to the event. The Contractor may submit a consolidated or master plan for contracts requiring numerous events in lieu of separate plans.

(b) The Contractor shall manage the contract in accordance with the standards set forth in 28 CFR part 36.

(End of clause)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 52 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 52

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
``Restoring Internet Freedom'' (83 Fed. Reg. 7852 (February 22, 2018)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate May 16, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 52

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''.
```
# C_2019107EN.01000801.xml

| 21.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 March 2019

(2019/C 107/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1354 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4624 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4310 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1338 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 132,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6915 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,646 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,29 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2834 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7615 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,2152 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5999 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5125 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9128 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6567 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5335 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 281,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,3783 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6014 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4178 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 082,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6109 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,042 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,0040 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,032 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3012 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5168 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,1360 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1354

JPY

Japanese yen

126,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4624

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86280

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4310

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1338

ISK

Iceland króna

132,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6915

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,646

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,29

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2834

RON

Romanian leu

4,7615

TRY

Turkish lira

6,2152

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5999

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5125

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9128

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6567

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5335

KRW

South Korean won

1 281,96

ZAR

South African rand

16,3783

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6014

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4178

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 082,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6109

PHP

Philippine peso

60,042

RUB

Russian rouble

73,0040

THB

Thai baht

36,032

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3012

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5168

INR

Indian rupee

78,1360

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Williams, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 17, 1977, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts) and robbery in the first *688degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three concurrent terms of *12V2*to 25 years, to run consecutively to a 25-year Federal sentence. Judgment modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentences to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment with a maximum of 25 years and by deleting the direction that the sentences be served consecutively to the Federal sentence and substituting therefor a provision that the State sentences be served concurrently with the Federal sentence. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Upon the argument of the appeal, the District Attorney consented to the foregoing modification of the judgment. Appellant’s sentence as a predicate felon was improper because, as respondent concedes, the Federal crime that the District Attorney certified as the predicate felony is not a felony in New York (see US Code, tit 18, §§ 371, 2113, subd [b]; Penal Law, § 70.06, subd 1, par [b], cl [i]). We reject respondent’s argument that the amendment to section 70.06 of the Penal Law should not be applied because the crimes herein were committed prior to the effective date thereof. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
#### 30.000 Scope of part.

This part describes policies and procedures for applying the Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) rules and regulations (48 CFR chapter 99) to negotiated contracts and subcontracts. This part does not apply to sealed bid contracts or to any contract with a small business concern (see 48 CFR 9903.201-1(b) for these and other exemptions).

[57 FR 39587, Aug. 31, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 18916, Apr. 29, 1996; 62 FR 40237, July 25, 1997; 85 FR 67614, Oct. 23, 2020]
326.505 Applicability. The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.226-1, Indian Preference, and the clause at 352.226-2, Indian Preference Program, in contracts to implement section 7(b) of Public Law 93-638 for all Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) activities. Contracting activities shall use the clauses as follows, except for those exempted solicitations and contracts issued and or awarded pursuant to Title I of Public Law 93-638 (25 U.S.C. 450 *et seq.*): ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.226-1, Indian Preference, in solicitations, contracts, and orders when— ( 1 ) The award is (or will be) pursuant to an act specifically authorizing such awards with Indian organizations; or
( 2 ) The work is specifically for the benefit of Indians and is in addition to any incidental benefits which might otherwise accrue to the general public.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.226-2, Indian Preference Program, in solicitations, contracts, and orders when— ( 1 ) The dollar amount of the acquisition is expected to equal or exceed $650,000 for non-construction work or $1.5 million for construction work;
( 2 ) The solicitation, contract, or order includes the Indian Preference clause; and
( 3 ) The contracting officer makes the determination, prior to solicitation, that performance will take place in whole or in substantial part on or near an Indian reservation(s). In addition, the contracting officer may insert the Indian Preference Program clause in solicitations, contracts, and orders below the $650,000 or $1.5 million level for non-construction or construction contracts, respectively, but which meet the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section, and in the opinion of the contracting officer, offer substantial opportunities for Indian employment, training, and subcontracting.