**First in the World Program**

**Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)**

**FY 2015 Development Competition**

**U.S. Department of Education**

**Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE)**

**Table of Contents**

A.  Overview

B.  Eligibility and Requirements

C.  Priorities

D.  Selection Criteria

E.  Evaluation

F.  Use of Funds

G.  Other Matters

**A.  Overview**

**A-1.  What is the purpose of the FITW program?**

The FITW program is designed to support the development, replication, and dissemination of innovative solutions and evidence for what works in addressing persistent and widespread challenges in postsecondary education for students who are at risk for not persisting in and completing postsecondary programs, including, but not limited to, adult learners, working students, part-time students, students from low-income backgrounds, students of color, students with disabilities, and first-generation students.  The focus of the FITW program is to build evidence for what works in postsecondary education by testing the effectiveness of these strategies in improving student persistence and completion outcomes. 

**A-2.  How do you prepare a successful application?**

Applicants should become thoroughly familiar with all the FITW Development documents in grants.gov and on the FIPSE website.  Read the FITW Federal Register Notice (also called the Notice Inviting Applications-NIA), the application package of forms and instructions, the FITW website materials, and the FAQs that are on the FITW website.  There is a wealth of information in these documents.  Register for the technical assistance webinars.  The dates and instructions for registering for the webinars are listed on the FITW website at: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/fitw/index.html?exp=0.  If you cannot attend the webinars check the FITW website for the posted PowerPoint slides and script.  

**A-3.  What are the two types of grants for which applicants may compete for funding under the FITW program?**

Two types of grants are available under the FITW program: Development and Validation.  

Development grants provide funding to support the development or testing of practices that are supported by strong theory (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1) and whose efficacy should be systematically studied.  Development grants will support new or substantially more effective practices for addressing widely shared challenges.  Development projects are novel and significant nationally, not projects that simply implement existing practices in additional locations or support needs that are primarily local in nature.  Applicants are encouraged to design a rigorous and independent evaluation that if well-implemented, produces evidence about the project's effectiveness that would meet the What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with or without reservations.  

An entity that submits an application for a Development grant must include the following information in its application:  an estimate of the number of students to be served by the project; evidence of the applicant’s ability to implement and appropriately evaluate the proposed project; and information about its capacity (e.g., qualified personnel, financial resources, and management capacity) to further develop and bring the project to a larger scale directly or through partners, either during or following the grant period, if positive results are obtained.

Validation grants provide funding to support expansion of projects supported by moderate evidence of effectiveness (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1) to the national or regional level.  Validation grants must further assess the effectiveness of the FITW-supported practice through a rigorous and independent evaluation, with particular focus on the populations for and the contexts in which the practice is most effective.   We expect and consider it appropriate that each applicant will propose to use the Validation funding to build its capacity to deliver the FITW-supported practice, particularly early in the funding period, to successfully reach the level of scale proposed in its application.  Additionally, we expect that each applicant will address any specific barriers to the growth or scaling of the organization or practice (including barriers related to cost-effectiveness) in order to deliver the FITW-supported practice at the proposed level of scale and provide strategies to address these barriers as part of its proposed scaling plan.

An applicant for a Validation grant must estimate the number of students to be reached by the proposed project and provide evidence of its capacity to reach the proposed number of students during the course of the grant.  In addition, an applicant for a Validation grant must provide evidence of its capacity (e.g., qualified personnel, financial resources, management capacity) to scale up to a State or regional level, working directly or through partners either during or following the grant period.

**A-4.  What are the priorities, requirements, and selection criteria for the FY 2015 FITW Development grant competition?**

The Department published the NIA for the FITW Development competition in the *Federal Register* on May 11, 2015.  The NIA includes the priorities, requirements, and selection criteria that the Department will use for the 2015 FITW Development competition.

**A-5.****How does the department decide what priorities, definitions, and requirements will be used in a particular FITW competition?**

The Department selects priorities, definitions, and requirements for the FITW program from the Notice of Final Priorities (NFP) published on May 11, 2015 in the *Federal Register*.  The Department may also select priorities, definitions, and requirements from a list called the Secretary’s Supplemental Priorities published in the *Federal Register* on December 10, 2014 (79 FR 73425).  

**A-6.  Are the FITW grant awards for the entire four-year project period?**

Yes.  The estimated sizes of grant awards provided in the Development NIA are estimates of the total grant award and cover the entire four-year project period.  The 2015 FITW grants will be forward funded.  That means we will fund the total award at the beginning of the grant period.  Grantees will receive specific instructions on budget management.

**A-7.  Are there limits on the number of applications that an institution of higher education may submit and the number of grants that a grantee may receive under the FITW program?**

Yes.  An applicant may submit only one application (Development or Validation) in the 2015 FITW competition.   An applicant will be considered for an award only in the competition for which it applies.  This is done to allow all applicants to have an equal chance at an award. 

**A-8.  May an applicant who received a 2014 FITW award submit an application in 2015?**

No and Yes.  Grantees that have a 2014 FITW Development grant are not eligible to submit an application in 2015 for another Development grant.  However, grantees that have a 2014 Development grant are eligible for a 2015 Validation grant.   

**A-9.  What are the types of FITW grants for the FY 2015 competition?**

There are two types of FITW grants available under the FY 2015 FITW competition, with different estimated ranges in awards, maximum award amounts, and estimated numbers of awards.

The Department is not bound by these estimates. 

**A-10.  The FITW Development competition has a set aside of up to $16,000,000 for MSIs.  How will an MSI be considered for that set aside?**

It is important to note that the set aside is part of a single budget appropriation.  An applicant that wishes to be considered as an MSI for this set aside must indicate MSI eligibility on the Abstract and Information page in the application.  To qualify as an eligible MSI under the FITW Program, an institution must meet one of two criteria.  The first criterion includes:  current eligibility approval as defined by the Department’s FY 2015 eligibility process for Title III and/or Title V of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended; an open grant under one of the Department’s Title III, Parts A and F and/or Title V programs; or a designation as a Historically Black College of University or a Tribally Controlled College.  The second criterion includes: specific enrollment percentages for minority students served; and, if applicable, needy student and educational and general (E&G) expenditure criteria for determining income eligibility.  

More information on MSI eligibility is in the application package under the section entitled Eligibility.  The Department will screen the applications to verify MSI eligibility based on these criteria and, if applicable, will use the most recent IPEDS data.  In the event an application does not qualify for MSI eligibility, it will still be reviewed.

The FITW program has $60,000,000 for funding.  In implementing this set aside, the Department may fund high-quality applications from MSIs out of rank order in the competition for Development grants, Validation grants or in both competitions.   We plan to allocate at least $20 million for Development grants but the actual amount will depend on the quality of the proposals for both competitions.  An application with MSI partners that has a non-MSI institution or agency as the lead applicant will not qualify for MSI status.  However, such an application will still be reviewed.

**A-11.  May an agency or an IHE be a partner in more than one FITW project?**

Yes, the limit on the number of grant awards applies only to grantees and does not limit the number of projects in which a partner may participate.  However, both applicants and partners should take into account institutional capacity to carry out responsibilities for more than one project. 

**A-12.  What review process will the Department follow after applications are submitted?**

The Department will select peer reviewers who will review and score applications against the established selection criteria.  The peer reviewers will come from varied postsecondary backgrounds and professions, including college and university educators, researchers and evaluators, and others with evaluation expertise.  All reviewers will be thoroughly screened for conflicts of interest to ensure a fair and competitive review process.

For FITW Development grant applications, the Department will use a two-tier review process to review and score eligible applications.  Content reviewers will review and score eligible applications on the three selection criteria:  A. Significance; B. Quality of the Project Design; and C. Adequacy of Resources.  These reviewers will also review and score the applications which address the competitive preference priority.  Eligible applications that score highly on these three selection criteria will have the remaining criterion, D. Quality of the Project Evaluation, reviewed and scored by a different panel of peer reviewers with evaluation expertise.  

**A-13.  How will the Secretary make final decisions to award grants under the FITW competition?**

For the FITW competition in FY 2015, a rank order of all applications will be developed based on the peer reviewers’ evaluation of their quality according to the selection criteria.  In accordance with 34 CFR 75.217 (c)(3), the Secretary will make final awards after considering the rank order and other information, including an applicant’s performance, use of funds, and compliance history under previous awards under any Department program.  

**A-14.  Will an applicant receive its scores from the peer review process?**

Yes.  Following the completion of the peer review process and after awards are made, each applicant will receive the reviewer comments and scores for its application. The person listed as the project director will receive a copy of their scores. 

**A-15.  When will FITW awards be made, and what will be the start date for projects?**

All FITW grants will be awarded by September 30, 2015. The annual performance period for all FITW grants begins each year on October 1 and ends September 30 of the following year.

**A-16.  Will grants only be awarded in the $2-3 million budget range?**

No.  The range of awards is simply an estimate.  There are no advantages or extra points for submitting a proposal budget in this estimated range.  Applications may not include a budget exceeding $3 million.  The range of awards is not meant to establish a minimum award amount.  An applicant may submit a project with a budget below $2 million and have the same chances for funding as anyone else.

**B.  Eligibility and Requirements**

**B-1.  What is the standard of evidence that applies to all FITW applications?**

To be eligible for an award, an application must be supported by strong theory, as defined in the FITW NIA.  Strong Theory means a rationale for the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice that includes a logic model.  Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a well-specified conceptual framework that identifies key components of the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice (i.e., the active “ingredients” that are hypothesized to be critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the relationship among the key components and outcomes, theoretically and operationally.  

**B-2.  What types of entities are eligible to apply for a FITW award?**

Institutions of higher education, combinations of such institutions, and other public and private nonprofit institutions and agencies. Applicants are encouraged to partner with other public and private organizations and agencies.  

**B-3.  Does an application for a FITW grant need to meet all eligibility requirements?**

Yes.  Applications for FITW grants must meet all program requirements.  The NIA and application package provide instructions for all the required information, resumes, page formats, page limits, and standard forms for a complete application.  Incomplete applications will not be reviewed.   

**B-4.  What does “partner” and “branch campus” mean in the FITW program?**

A partner is any organization, institution, or agency that collaborates with the lead applicant on a project.  There is a wide range of potential partners that can be from various types of entities (public or private, nonprofit or for-profit, philanthropic organization or foundation, etc.).   

A branch campus, the same as any IHE, may serve as an applicant institution or as a partner in a consortium.   The EDGAR regulations at 34 CFR Part 606.7(b) and 34 CFR Part 607.7(e) define “branch campus” as a unit of a college or university that is geographically apart from the main campus and independent of that main campus.  We consider a unit of a college or university to be independent of the main campus if the unit is permanent in nature; offers courses for credit and programs leading to an associate or bachelor’s degree; is autonomous to the extent that it has its own faculty and administrative or supervisory organization; and its own budgetary and hiring authority.  

**B-5.  Should all partners be identified in the application?**

Yes, all partners should be identified on the Abstract and Information page.  A letter of commitment from a senior official is also strongly encouraged from each partner.  

**B-6.  Are for-profit entities eligible to apply for a FITW grant?**

No.  For-profit institutions and organizations are not eligible as applicants. Although for-profit organizations may not be an eligible applicant and cannot receive federal funds, for-profit entities may be involved in projects as partners.     

**B-7.  Must FITW projects serve only high need students?**

All grantees must implement practices that are designed to improve persistence, academic progress, time to degree, and/or completion in higher education for high need students.  While proposed projects may benefit a wider definition of students, the primary scope of the competition should focus on high need students.  High-need student means a student at risk of educational failure or otherwise in need of special assistance and support such as adult learners, working students, part-time students, students from low-income backgrounds, students of color, first-generation students, students with disabilities, and students who are English learners.  (Note:  The Department does not limit the definition of high-need students to this list.  This list is illustrative and may include other categories of high-need students). 

**B-8.  Must a development project include a minimum number of students?**

Yes.  Applicants should include a description of the total unduplicated number of students involved in the control and treatment groups.  This information should be included in the Abstract and Information page as well as in the “Quality of the Project Evaluation” criterion.

**B-9.  What does the term “requirement’ mean?**

The term “requirement” means that anything listed in the NIA as a requirement must be met or provided by the applicant to be considered as an eligible proposal for funding.

**C.  Priorities**

**C-1.  Are there absolute priorities that an applicant must meet in order to receive a FITW grant?**

Yes.  Three absolute priorities apply to the FY 2015 FITW Development competition.  For Absolute Priority 2 and Absolute Priority 3, we have identified multiple subparts.  Applicants that address one of these absolute priorities must select one subpart that the proposed project will address to meet the absolute priority.  The absolute priorities are:

Absolute Priority 1:  Improving Teaching and Learning. 

Projects designed to improve teaching and learning through: 

Instruction-level tools or strategies such as adaptive learning technology, educational games, personalized learning, active- or project-based learning, faculty-centered strategies that systematically improve the quality of teaching, or multi-disciplinary efforts focused on improving instructional experiences.

Absolute Priority 2:  Developing and Using Assessments of Learning. 

Projects that support the development and use of externally validated assessments of student learning and stated learning goals through one of the following: 

(a)  Alternative assessment tools or strategies such as micro- or competency-based assessments, assessments embedded in curriculum, or simulations, games, or other technology-based assessment approaches.

(b)  Aligning assessments across sectors and institutions, such as across kindergarten through grade 12 and postsecondary education systems or across two-year and four-year institutions, to improve college readiness and content delivery.

Absolute Priority 3:  Facilitating Pathways to Credentialing and Transfer. 

Projects designed to develop and implement systems and practices to capture and aggregate credit or other evidence of knowledge and skills towards postsecondary degrees or credentials through one of the following: 

(a)  Seamless transfer of credits between postsecondary institutions; or

(b)  Validation and transfer of credit for learning or learning experiences from non-institutional sources.

See the full text of these priorities in the FITW NIA and NFP.

**C-2.  Is there a competitive preference priority (CPP) for the FY 2014 FITW competition for which an applicant may receive additional points?**

Yes.  There is one CPP for the FY 2015 competition.  It is worth up to 5 additional points.  

The competitive preference priority is:

Implementing Low Cost-High Impact Strategies to Improve Student Outcomes.  

Under this CPP, the Secretary gives priority to projects that use low-cost tools or strategies, such as those that use technology, that result in a high impact on student outcomes.  The application narrative is where the applicant will address the CPP.   The page limit for addressing this CPP is 2 pages.  Applicants should include a separate heading for the CPP if they choose to address it.  The full text for this priority is in the FITW NIA.

**C-3.  Will an applicant receive more points for submitting the application under a particular absolute priority over another absolute priority?**

No.  An applicant must identify one absolute priority under which it is submitting its application.  An applicant will not receive more points, additional “credit,” or other advantage based on the absolute priority it identifies in its application.  Peer reviewers will use the selection criteria to determine how well an applicant addresses the absolute priority it identifies.   

**C-4.  Where does an applicant identify in its application the absolute priority it is addressing?**

Applicants must list the absolute priority that is addressed in the proposal on the Abstract and Information page and explain in greater detail the same priority in the Project Narrative.

**D.  Selection Criteria**

**D-1.  What selection criteria apply to the applications for a FITW grant?**

An application for a FITW grant may receive up to 100 points for addressing the selection criteria and up to 5 additional points for addressing the CPP (optional).  A full explanation of the criteria and CPP may be found in the NIA and the application package.  Four selection criteria and one CPP apply to the competition:

Selection Criteria

A.  Significance (up to 20 points)

B.  Quality of the Project Design (up to 30 points)

C.  Adequacy of Resources (up to 20 points)

D.  Quality of Project Evaluation (up to 30 points)

Competitive Preference Priority (up to 5 points)

Implementing Low Cost-High Impact Strategies to Improve Student Outcomes.  

**D-2.  Must an applicant include a logic model to address the Quality of Project Design selection criterion?**

Yes.  The reference to a logic model in the definition of Strong Theory and under Quality of Project Design is a constructive way to address the three sub-criteria, namely, the need to define the target population, the need to define an exceptional approach to the priority selected, and the use of a framework for the conceptual design of the entire project.   Many variations of logic models exist.  We encourage you to consider a logic model made of inputs, activities, outcomes, and includes a timeline.

**D-3.  For Quality of the Project Evaluation, must an applicant respond to both selection factors (2) and (3)?**

Under the Quality of the Project Evaluation selection criterion, selection factors (2) and (3) read as follows (emphasis added):

(2)   The extent to which the methods of evaluation will, if well implemented, produce evidence about the project’s effectiveness that would meet the What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards *with*reservations.  

(3)   The extent to which the methods of evaluation will, if well implemented, produce evidence about the project’s effectiveness that would meet the What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards *without* reservations.  

Applicants need only respond to one of these selection factors.  Applicants should note that the What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards *without* reservations requires a more rigorous evaluation design than *with*reservations.  Applicants who propose an evaluation design in response to selection factor (3) will not receive more points under this criterion than an applicant who proposes an evaluation design in response to selection factor (2).

We encourage eligible applicants to review the following technical assistance resources on evaluation:  

(1) What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook:  http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/references/idocviewer/doc.aspx?docid=19&tocid=1; and 

     (2)IES/NCEE Technical Methods papers:  http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/tech_methods/.

**E.  Evaluation**

**E-1.  Must a grantee conduct an independent evaluation of its FITW project?**

Yes.  A grantee must conduct an evaluation of its project by an independent evaluator.  As defined in the NIA the evaluator must be independent of and external to the grantee institution.  No employee of the applicant entity or any partner entity may serve as the project evaluator.  

The submission of a resume for the independent and external evaluator is an application requirement.  The applicant is encouraged to select an evaluator with experience in the design and management of evaluations designed to meet What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards. 

**E-2.  What should applicants consider including in their evaluation plans?**

Applicants should present clear, detailed evaluation plans in their applications.  In responding to Selection Criterion D: Quality of the Project Evaluation, applicants are encouraged to consider addressing the following to the fullest extent possible:

· the key questions to be addressed and the research methods for each, including a discussion of how treatment and control or comparison groups (for experimental and quasi-experimental studies) will be formed

· a justification of how the proposed sample will adequately represent implementation at the proposed scale (including in diverse settings and, where appropriate, focused on diverse student population groups);

· the determination of the proposed sample sizes and minimum detectable effect sizes, and analytic approaches for addressing the key questions; 

· a summary of the proposed data sources and collection methods, including  the measures used to describe the  implementation of the FITW-supported project or its critical features  (to facilitate replication or testing in other settings), the fidelity of implementation to the original model, the treatment-control contrast for key implementation variables, and the intended outcomes;

· the proposed resources to carry out the project evaluation effectively; and

· the qualifications of the proposed independent evaluation staff.

All FITW grantees must collect data and report on the FITW performance measures as established in the FY 2015 NIA.  

**E-3.  Must a grantee use a specified percentage of the grant award for the design and implementation of its project evaluation?**

No.  The Department does not prescribe a percent or amount of funding that a grantee must use to design and implement its independent evaluation.  Peer reviewers will use Selection Criterion C: Adequacy of Resources to assess the extent to which the proposed project plan includes sufficient resources to carry out the project evaluation effectively.  You may wish to consider an evaluation budget that is between 5% and 15% of the total project costs.  

**E-4.  Must grantees make the results of evaluations widely available?**

Yes.  All FITW grantees must make their results widely available through formal (e.g., peer-reviewed journals) or informal (e.g., newsletters) mechanisms, and in print or electronically, the results of any evaluations it conducts of its funded activities.  Grantees must also ensure the data from their evaluations are made available to third-party researchers consistent with applicable privacy requirements.  Specific requirements for citations are provided for all grantees.

**E-5.  Must a grantee comply with the requirements of any evaluation of the FITW program conducted by the Department?**

Yes.  A grantee must comply with the requirements of any evaluation of the FITW program conducted by the Department.  The Department’s Institute of Education Sciences (IES) will be involved in evaluating the FITW program, in providing technical assistance to evaluators of funded projects and in synthesizing evidence from multiple FITW projects. 

**E-6.  Must a grantee cooperate with technical assistance provided by the Department or its contractor?**

Yes.  Grantees, along with their independent evaluators, must cooperate with any technical assistance provided by the Department or its contractor.  The purpose of this technical assistance is to ensure that evaluations are of the highest quality and to encourage commonality in evaluation approaches across funded projects where such commonality is feasible and useful.

**F.  Use of Funds**

**F-1.  What constitutes a competitive budget?**

Successful grant writing does not begin with the budget.  Successful proposals begin with clearly written and persuasive narratives.  Then and only then, is it time to construct a budget that is clear and supports the proposed activities.  Budgets should clearly reflect the scale and scope of the project.  For example, a budget for a single institution involving 500 students is substantially different from a three-institution consortium involving 9000 students.  Similarly, there are differences in budgets that support one or two interventions and others that involve three or more interventions.  In short, think carefully about what you need to successfully complete your project.  Don’t submit a budget that is excessive but also don’t submit a budget that is inadequate.  

Budgets are assessed by the peer reviewers under the Adequacy of Resources criterion for relevance and appropriateness to the proposed project.  Budgets are also carefully reviewed by staff to ensure allowable budget requests.  If you have a question about an allowable budget item, you may contact program staff.    Read the program specific budget instructions in the application package.  Funding requests for unallowable items will be removed from budgets and may result in making an application no longer competitive for funding.

**F-2.  What information should be included in the budget narrative?**

Each applicant must provide a line item budget (ED Standard Form 524) for the ED funds requested in section A and a budget narrative.  No cost share or matching funds are required in the FITW program.  Instructions for completing ED Standard Form 524 are included in the FITW application package, available on the Department’s Web site at www.ed.gov/fipse  and in grants.gov.    

**F-2.  Should an applicant submit a separate budget for a partner?**

No.  Each application should include only one budget and one budget narrative that includes the costs and justification of costs for the entire project.  Explanations for partner costs may be included in the budget narrative.

**F-3.  How does an applicant determine what expenditures are allowable or, alternatively, what expenditures are prohibited?**

The budget an applicant includes in its application should include only costs that are allowable, reasonable and necessary for carrying out the objectives of the FITW project.  Rules about allowable costs are included both in EDGAR (*see*http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.html) and in the cost principles contained in CFR (formerly Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular:  A-21 for institutions of higher education. *see*http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2012-title2-vol1/CFR-2012-title2-vol1-part220/content-detail.html).

**F-4.  Is the FITW program subject to a restricted indirect cost rate?**

Yes.  FITW uses a general training program rate of 8% for the FITW program.  For an explanation see the application package.  This rate applies to the applicant institution and all partners because the FITW program does not include sub-grants.  The applicant institution reimburses partners for allowable costs.

**F-5.  May an applicant incur pre-award costs?**

Yes.  Under 34 CFR 75.263 and 74.25, applicants may incur allowable, pre-award costs for up to 90 days prior to the beginning of the award period.  However, applicants incur these costs at their own risk.  If an applicant does not receive an award, the Department will not reimburse the applicant for pre-award costs.  Pre-award costs may not be used to prepare the application.

**F-6.  May students receive direct funding under this program?**

No, student financial assistance in any form is not allowed under this program.  That includes such things as stipends, tuition, and other forms of student financial assistance.  Funds related to housing, food, mentoring, tutoring, summer camps, or stipends for undergraduate research are also not an allowable cost.

**F-7.  Will there be annual meetings of the project directors?**

Yes, you must budget for an annual two-day meeting in Washington, DC.  The project director, the project evaluator, and one representative from each partner should attend.  Travel and lodging costs for these meetings must be included in the budget.  There is a special meeting for new project directors and evaluators early in the first year.

**F-8.  May grant funds be used for construction?**

No, the FITW program is classified as a non-construction program.  This includes any form of construction, remodeling, or renovation.  

**F-9.  Are there restrictions on travel?**

Yes, travel is restricted to domestic travel and must be related to the project.

**G. Other Matters**

**G-1.  Should an applicant include letters of support in its application?**

Yes.  Peer reviewers will assess the letters to consider key responsibilities, commitment from partners, and broad support from faculty and staff.  

**G-2.  Must an applicant notify its State that it is applying for a FITW grant?**

Yes.  This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and 34 CFR part 79, which allow States that have chosen to participate in the intergovernmental review process the opportunity to review and comment on applications submitted to the Department for funding.  An applicant should check with its appropriate State single point of contact (SPOC) to inquire if its State participates in the intergovernmental review process.  For a list of States that have chosen to participate in the intergovernmental review process, *see*http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc/.  Not all states have points of contact. 

**G-3.  Will my FITW application be made public?**

The Department will post the project abstracts of funded FY 2015 FITW applications on the FITW website.  Personal information will not be posted.  At the conclusion of the grant competition proposals may be requested through www.foia.gov.  Copies of applications are not provided by FITW Program Staff. 

**G-4.  Whom should applicants contact if they have additional questions?**

Questions pertaining to this program may be emailed to OPEFITWdevelopment@ed.gov.

Updated May 8, 2015