alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Step 2 Agglomerator Stack Test History

Line 4 Waste gas: SV118, Group 10, Eus

Test Approval Pellet PM/PM-10 PM-10 CO VOC NOx SO2 THC Fluoride Fuel Feed Prodctn Flow Rate Wet Scrubber

Date Date Type

Filterable 

lbs/hr

Filt + Org 

lbs/hr

Inorg 

lbs/hr

Total 

lbs/hr

Total 

lbs/ton

Filterable 

gr/dscf

Filt + Org 

gr/dscf

Inorg 

gr/dscf

Total 

gr/dscf lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr conc. lbs/hr Type PreH Tot MBTUH Rate Rate dscfm Delta P GPM

12-Jul-05 27-Feb-06 Acid 31.00 31.00 32.00 63.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 13.00 3.10 133 0.74 gas/wood 0.00 202.00 587 464 425000 11.15 2987

17-Nov-05 29-Mar-06 Fluxed 0.31 519 385 471000

30-Aug-06 Fluxed 44.00 0.01 gas/wood 282.00 571 409 431000 9.8 2759

25-Apr-08 15.00 0.004 gas/wood 135.00 450 356 397000 7.4 2757

04-Nov-09 Fluxed 76.40 7.60 1.46 gas/wood

Line 5 Waste gas: SV127, Group 10, Eus

Test Pellet PM/PM-10 PM-10 CO VOC NOx SO2 THC Fluoride Fuel Feed Prodctn Flow Rate Wet Scrubber

Date Type

Filterable 

lbs/hr

Filt + Org 

lbs/hr

Inorg 

lbs/hr

Total 

lbs/hr

Total 

lbs/ton

Filterable 

gr/dscf

Filt + Org 

gr/dscf

Inorg 

gr/dscf

Total 

gr/dscf lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr conc. lbs/hr Type PreH Tot MBTUH Rate Rate dscfm Delta P GPM

18-May-05 Acid 84 86 21 107 0.175 0.0230 0.0240 0.0050 0.0290 16 2.2 93.73 1.3 gas/wood 0.00 267.80 538.8 479.6 426000 9.81 3041

18-Nov-05 29-Mar-06 Fluxed 0.35 493 374 417000

28-Sep-06 Fluxed 57 0.0140 gas/wood 293.00 548 408 477000 8.9 3030

6-Dec-06 Fluxed 49 0.0130 gas/wood 264.00 428 312 429000 8.7 2819

5-Mar-09 Fluxed 27.6 6.1 1.5 gas/wood 290.00 508 392 426000 9.3 2763

21-Sep-11 Fluxed 54 56 6 62 0.141 0.0135 0.0139 0.0016 0.0155 gas/wood 64.00 266.00 516 384 469000 9.9 2861
#### 32.101 Authority.

The basic authority for the contract financing described in this part is contained in 41 U.S.C. chapter 45, Contract Financing, 10 U.S.C. chapter 277, and Title III of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2091).

[79 FR 24211, Apr. 29, 2014, as amended at 87 FR 73899, Dec. 1, 2022]
EPA carbon hearing testimony, May 24th 2012 Carol Oldham, National Wildlife Federation

Good afternoon, my name is Carol Oldham, and I live in Brookline Massachusetts. Iam the National Wildlife Federation's Northeast Regional Outreach Coordinator. I am here on behalf ofthe morethan 500,000 members and supporters ofthe National Wildlife Federation in the Northeast. Iam also an elected representaitver in Brookline. The town ofBrookline and the state of Massachusetts have made strong commitments to decrease their carbon emissions because they represent a clear dangerto human health and the natural world. I personally have made every effort in my individual life to decrease my impacts and dedicated my careerto helping others do so as well.

I love to get outdoors doing almost anything, but this lastwinter I had no chance to go skiing
or snowshoeing. The northeast had practically no winter at all. This yearwas the earliest recorded ice out on the lake in New Hampshirewhere my grandmother's cabin is, almost a month earlierthan lastyear. Ifound a tick on me when Iwent hiking in March, and who knows what the heatwill be like this summer. I love wildlife and worry about our moose- as Eric Orff ofNew Hampshire mentioned earlier in his testimony, they are suffering from increased tick populations. Some ofmyfavorite animals, like lynx, thrive in areas with cold winters, and are having a hard time as ourweather is already warming.

This is why carbon pollution should be controlled -..it,)s bad forour health, and bad forwildlife. Iapplaud the Environmental Protection Agency's1o'tontrol carbon pollution and I strongly encourageyou to move forward with this important rule. Iwould also encourageyou to look at controlling carbon pollution from existing power plants.

thank you foryourtime and the opportunityto speak to you today.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**Resources related to students with disabilities:**

A detailed explanation of the differences in rights and responsibilities of students with disabilities in secondary school and postsecondary institutions can be found in two pamphlets issued by the Department’s Office for Civil Rights.  They are:
                - POLICY GUIDANCE: A Transition Guide To Postsecondary Education andEmployment for Students and Youth With Disabilities (August 2020)  Link:  https://sites.ed.gov/idea/idea-files/policy-guidance-transition-guide-postsecondary-education-employment-students-youth-disabilities-august-2020/ .
                - Students with Disabilities Preparing for Postsecondary Education:  Know Your Rights and Responsibilities

**OPE Applicant and Grantee Resources
Institutional Services
   Printable view  Last Modified: 09/23/2021How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity

 
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
- vote.gov**
3433.103 Protests to the agency. ( d ) ( 4 ) ( i ) All protests to the agency must be submitted to the contracting officer identified in the solicitation. Interested parties may request an independent review of their protest as an alternative to consideration by the contracting officer. If a protest is silent on this matter, the contracting officer will decide the protest. The Department will not consider an appeal of the contracting officer's protest decision.
( ii ) If the protester requests an independent review, the HCA will decide the protest. In the event the HCA is not at least one level above the contracting officer, or if the HCA has been substantially involved in the procurement, the SPE will decide the protest.
( iii ) Contracting officers must include the provision at 3452.233-70 in solicitations.
( f ) ( 3 ) The contracting officer's HCA must approve the justification or determination to continue performance.
# C_2018200EN.01000101.xml

| 11.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 200/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 190, 4.6.2018

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 182, 28.5.2018

OJ C 166, 14.5.2018

OJ C 161, 7.5.2018

OJ C 152, 30.4.2018

OJ C 142, 23.4.2018

OJ C 134, 16.4.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Part B, Sec. 619, as amended; 20 U.S.C. 1419.

34 CFR 300, Subpart H

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
# C_2019356EN.01000501.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2019/C 356/05)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Republic of San Marino

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national side features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: The Republic of San Marino

Subject of commemoration: 550th anniversary of the death of Filippo Lippi

Description of the design: The centre of the coin features the Madonna and Child, a detail from Filippo Lippi’s ‘Madonna and Child with Two Angels’; above are the inscriptions ‘SAN MARINO’ and ‘FILIPPO LIPPI’ and on the left are the year ‘1469’ and the letter ‘R’ identifying the Mint of Rome. On the bottom left are the initials of the artist Maria Angela Cassol ‘M.A.C.’, and in the centre the year ‘2019’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 60 500

Date of issue: September 2019

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
#### 32.501 General.

Progress payments may be customary or unusual. Customary progress payments are those made under the general guidance in this subpart, using the customary progress payment rate, the cost base, and frequency of payment established in the Progress Payments clause, and either the ordinary liquidation method or the alternate method as provided in subsections 32.503-8 and 32.503-9. Any other progress payments are considered unusual, and may be used only in exceptional cases when authorized in accordance with subsection 32.501-2.
3016.406 Contract clauses. ( e ) ( 1 ) ( i ) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.216-71, Determination of Award Fee, in solicitations and contracts that include an award fee.
( ii ) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.216-72, Performance Evaluation Plan, in all solicitations and contracts that include an award fee.
( iii ) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.216-73, Distribution of Award Fee, in all solicitations and contracts that include an award fee.
[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 25770, May 2, 2006]
Exhibit32

COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 13, 2008 | /s/    Dennis M.      DiFlorio |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Dennis      M. DiFlorio                            |
|                      | Chairman,      Commerce NA                         |
|                      |                                               |
|                      |                                               |
| Date:      March 13, 2008 | /s/   Douglas J.      Pauls         |
|                      | Douglas      J. Pauls                              |
|                      | Chief      Financial Officer                       |

----
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 231

EX PA R TE D A R R EL L W A Y N E P A R K ER , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAU S E NO. 9 9 0 0 9 - A I N THE CRI M I NAL DI S TRI CT CO URT

FROM J EFF ERS ON CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault of a

child and sente nced to fifty

y ear s’ imprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appea ls affirme d his conviction. Pa rk

e r v . S tat e , No. 09-07-00480- CR (Tex. App. – B eaumont, Oc tober 15, 2008)
. Applicant conte nds that his counsel re tained to file a petition for discre tionary revie w rende red ine ffe ctive assistanc e bec ause c ounsel failed to timely file the pe tition, t here by

denying Ap pli c a nt h is o pp or

tun ity to s e e k d isc re tio na

ry re vie w f ro m th is C ourt
.2

Counsel f i l ed an aff

idavit with the trial court. B ased on that affidavit, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law that counsel failed to timely file Applica

nt’s petition for discretionar

y revie w. The trial court r ecommends that relief be g rante d

. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W. 2d 25 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 97 ). We fi nd , the re fo re , tha t App lic a nt is e nti tle d to the op po rt un ity to f ile a n o ut- of

-t ime pe tit ion fo r dis c re tio na ry re vie w of

the jud g me nt o f t

he Ni nth Cou rt of Ap pe a ls in Cause No. 09-07-00480- CR that aff irmed his conviction in Case No. 99009-A from the Criminal District Courtof J eff

erson County
. Applicant shall file his petition f or discre tionary

revie w with the Ni nth Court of Ap pe a ls w ith in 3 0 d a y s o f t he date on

wh ic h th is C ourt ’s mand a te iss ue s.

Deliver ed: September

23, 2009 Do no t pu bli sh
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Paul Pasquier, Deceased.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. See memorandum decision on the prior motion (22 A D 2d 655). Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Yalente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
EXHIBIT 12.1

              CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
             RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
       FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
                  (Thousands Except Ratio)
                        (Unaudited)


Operating Income                                                $279,332

Adjustments:
  Federal income taxes                                            60,792
  Provision for deferred Federal income taxes                    (42,955)
  Deferred investment tax credits                                 (5,789)
  Other income and deductions                                     12,695
  Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
    used during construction                                       5,447
  Mirror CWIP amortization                                        47,750

        Earnings                                                $357,272


Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                                    $117,385
  Interest on short-term debt and other                           18,487

         Fixed Charges                                          $135,872


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                  2.63
# C_2018423EN.01001701.xml

| 23.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 November 2018

(2018/C 423/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1403 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4616 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88598 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3035 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1351 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7398 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,990 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 321,52 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3004 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6593 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,0336 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5721 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5074 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9299 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6744 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5652 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 287,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7042 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9052 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4285 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 584,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7801 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,749 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,7458 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,607 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3368 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0660 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,6045 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1403

JPY

Japanese yen

128,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4616

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88598

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3035

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1351

ISK

Iceland króna

141,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7398

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,990

HUF

Hungarian forint

321,52

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3004

RON

Romanian leu

4,6593

TRY

Turkish lira

6,0336

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5721

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5074

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9299

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6744

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5652

KRW

South Korean won

1 287,51

ZAR

South African rand

15,7042

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9052

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4285

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 584,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7801

PHP

Philippine peso

59,749

RUB

Russian rouble

74,7458

THB

Thai baht

37,607

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3368

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0660

INR

Indian rupee

80,6045

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George R. Fusfeld, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from, benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant stated that he .quit his job as stock manager or stock clerk because he was not given sufficient assistance and that by reason thereof he was subjected to pressure, tension and aggrava*679tian which he feared would endanger his health. It was within the board’s province to determine the weight and credibility of claimant’s testimony and that of the employer’s representative and we cannot, upon this record, disturb its finding that good cause was not shown. *(Matter of Gorman*[Catherwood], 17 A D 2d 885.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ.
#### Gerando M. Hanchett and others *vs.*Robert C. Jordan and Wife.

April 11, 1890.

Contract — Delivery on *Sunday.*— Held there was evidence to justify a particular instruction, correct as an abstract proposition of law.

Plaintiffs brought this action in the district court for St. Louis county, praying (among other things) that a written assignment by defendant Bobert C. of his interest in a land contract, be reformed by inserting plaintiffs’ names as assignees.' The writing bore date October 11, 1888, and one ground of defence was that it was executed and delivered on Sunday. At the trial of this issue, before *Holland,*J., (acting for a judge of the 11th district,) one of the plaintiffs, Frank G. Stevens, testified that the assignment and the note it was given to secure were made and delivered to him on Thursday, but further testified to the effect that it was understood that the matter should rest until his partner, the plaintiff Hanchett, should arrive on the following Sunday, as the witness did not wish to accept such security on his own account, or to act without Hanchett’s consent. The court instructed the jury, among other things, (plaintiffs excepting,) that “any paper affecting real estate takes effect from its delivery. If you find that this paper was executed and left with the plaintiffs, and that any contingency was to take place before it was to go into effect, and find that that contingency contemplated took place on Sunday, then the paper was executed on *150Sunday, and has no force whatever.” The defendants had a verdict, and the plaintiffs appeal from an order refusing a new trial.

*White & Reynolds,*for appellants.

*S. D. Allen,*for respondents.

Gilfillan, C. J.

The instruction to the jury upon which the assignments of error are based is conceded to be correct as a proposition of law, the only objection to it being that, as there was no evidence in the case to which it could be applicable, it might mislead the jury. There was, however, evidence in the testimony of the plaintiff Stevens from which the jury might have found that the delivery of the paper on Thursday, testified to by him, was not regarded by the parties as a final delivery, made with intent that the paper should go into effect by reason of it, but that the consummation of the delivery was postponed to abide the result of the conference with the plaintiff Hanchett, agreed to be had and in fact had on Sunday. This being the case, the instruction was proper.

Order affirmed.