alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
26.204 Justification for expenditures to other than local firms. ( a ) 42 U.S.C. 5150(b)(1) requires that, subsequent to any Presidential declaration of a major disaster or emergency, any expenditure of Federal funds, under an emergency response contract not awarded to a local firm, must be justified in writing in the contract file. The justification should include consideration for the scope of the major disaster or emergency and the immediate requirements or needs of supplies and services to ensure life is protected, victims are cared for, and property is protected.
( b ) The justification may be made on an individual or class basis. The contracting officer approves the justification.
Exhibit
      31.23





RULE
      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION


OF
      PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS LIGHT COMPANY


(required
      by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I,
      Scott
      A. Cisel, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September
      30,
      2005


of Central Illinois
      Light Company; and





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report.










Date:
      February 12, 2007









/s/
      Scott A.
      Cisel


Scott
      A.
      Cisel


Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPAQ
COMPUTER CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,666
<SECURITIES>                                       636
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                       222
<INVENTORY>                                      2,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,849
<PP&E>                                           6,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,627
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,277
<SALES>                                         31,902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,525
<CGS>                                           25,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    934
<INCOME-TAX>                                       365
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                569
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       569
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
# C_2018438EN.01000101.xml

| 5.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 438/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 438/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

4 December 2018

(2018/C 438/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1409 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4626 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89058 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2293 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1348 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6473 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,901 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2823 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6514 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,1035 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5451 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5031 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9071 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6406 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5550 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 261,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5292 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7986 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4015 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 303,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7319 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,035 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,7901 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,273 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3642 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2057 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,4720 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1409

JPY

Japanese yen

128,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4626

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89058

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2293

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1348

ISK

Iceland króna

139,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6473

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,901

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2823

RON

Romanian leu

4,6514

TRY

Turkish lira

6,1035

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5451

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5031

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9071

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6406

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5550

KRW

South Korean won

1 261,04

ZAR

South African rand

15,5292

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7986

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4015

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 303,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7319

PHP

Philippine peso

60,035

RUB

Russian rouble

75,7901

THB

Thai baht

37,273

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3642

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2057

INR

Indian rupee

80,4720

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 35.013 Insurance.

Nonprofit, educational, or State institutions performing cost-reimbursement contracts often do not carry insurance. They may claim immunity from liability for torts, or, as State institutions, they may be prohibited by State law from expending funds for insurance. When this is the case, see 28.311 for appropriate clause coverage.
#### n re BOARD OF RAPID TRANSIT R. M’RS FOR CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Sueme Court, Appellate Division, Second Dertment.

March 22, 1906.)

In the matter of ¡ application ot the board of rapid transit lroad commissioners for the city of New rk for the appointment of three commisners to determine and report whether a rapid nsit railway or railways for the convenience d transportation of persons and property, as termined by the board, ought to be construct- and operated. Brooklyn and Manhattan ip lines, Brooklyn sections.

No opinion. Or- *:*signed.
#### DEVINE, Appellant, v. HART, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action by Josephine Devine against Lemuel M. Hart, individually and as administrator, etc.

No opinion.- Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# C_2018027EN.01000501.xml

| 25.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 January 2018

(2018/C 27/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2352 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4451 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87183 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8323 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1735 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,374 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,01 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1563 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6648 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6263 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5310 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5229 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6556 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6677 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6181 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 315,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,7803 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8719 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4325 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 450,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8289 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,790 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,5725 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,032 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9437 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9045 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,6730 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2352

JPY

Japanese yen

135,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4451

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87183

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8323

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1735

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,374

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,01

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1563

RON

Romanian leu

4,6648

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6263

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5310

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5229

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6556

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6677

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6181

KRW

South Korean won

1 315,33

ZAR

South African rand

14,7803

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8719

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4325

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 450,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8289

PHP

Philippine peso

62,790

RUB

Russian rouble

69,5725

THB

Thai baht

39,032

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9437

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9045

INR

Indian rupee

78,6730

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit
10.223


 


WAIVER
AND MODIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS


 


WHEREAS, William J.
McMorrow, Mary L. Ricks, and Donald J. Herrema (the “Executives”) have each
entered into amendments to their respective employment agreements (the “Amendments”)
with Kennedy-Wilson, Inc. (“Company”), which Amendments provide, among
other things, that, subject to certain conditions, each of them shall be issued
900,000 shares of restricted stock of Prospect Acquisition Corp., which
restricted shares shall be eligible to vest at the rate of 180,000 shares a
year on the first through fifth anniversaries of the Effective Time, as defined
in the Amendments, and subject to the satisfaction of the Performance Target,
as defined in the Amendments;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, each Executive agrees that his or her Amendment shall be deemed
modified so that the reference to 900,000 restricted shares shall be deemed a
reference to 556,875 restricted shares and the reference to 180,000 shares
shall be deemed a reference to 111,375 restricted shares.


 


Subject to the foregoing,
the Amendments remain in full force and effect, and Company and the Executives
hereby ratify and affirm the Amendments in each and every respect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned have executed this Waiver and Modification on the dates written
below.


 


	
  COMPANY

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  KENNEDY-WILSON, Inc.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  a Delaware corporation

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Kent Y. Mouton

  	
   

  	
  October 22, 2009

  
	
  Kent Y. Mouton

  	
   

  	
  Date

  
	
  Chairman, Compensation
  Committee

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  EXECUTIVE

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ William J. McMorrow

  	
   

  	
  October 22, 2009

  
	
  William J. McMorrow

  	
   

  	
  Date

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Mary L. Ricks

  	
   

  	
  October 22, 2009

  
	
  Mary L. Ricks

  	
   

  	
  Date

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Donald J. Herrema

  	
   

  	
  October 22, 2009

  
	
  Donald J. Herrema

  	
   

  	
  Date
#### 3052.242-72 Contracting officer's representative.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3042.7000, insert the following clause:

# Contracting Officer's Representative (DEC 2003)

(a) The Contracting Officer may designate Government personnel to act as the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) to perform functions under the contract such as review or inspection and acceptance of supplies, services, including construction, and other functions of a technical nature. The Contracting Officer will provide a written notice of such designation to the Contractor within five working days after contract award or for construction, not less than five working days prior to giving the contractor the notice to proceed. The designation letter will set forth the authorities and limitations of the COR under the contract.

(b) The Contracting Officer cannot authorize the COR or any other representative to sign documents, such as contracts, contract modifications, etc., that require the signature of the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[86 FR 17317, Apr. 2, 2021]
**FY 2021 Title III, Part A, TCCU Discretionary New Funding Slate**
#### Floran Yagoda, Respondent, v Charles L. Yagoda, Appellant.

In an action in which a judgment of divorce had been granted to the plaintiff wife, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 18,1978, as (1) granted the plaintiff’s motion for an upward modification of the child support provision by increasing the award from $400 per month for the parties’ two children to $1,150 per month and (2) denied his motion for a downward modification of the child support provision. Order modified, on the facts, by reducing the child support award from $1,150 per month to $800 per month. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In our view, the increase in support for the two children was excessive to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Suozzi and Rabin, JJ., concur.
331.101-70 Salary rate limitation. ( a ) Beginning in fiscal year 1990, Congress has stipulated in the Department of Health and Human Services appropriations acts and continuing resolutions that, under applicable contracts, appropriated funds cannot be used to pay the direct salary of an individual above the stipulated rates. The applicable rates for each year are identified at *www.opm.gov*.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.231-70, Salary Rate Limitation, in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement; fixed-price level-of-effort; time-and-materials; or labor-hour contract is contemplated.
#### Robert Swarts and Harry Swarts, trading as Swarts Brothers, appellants, v. Robert G. Scelze, appellee.

Gen. No. 30,545.

Action for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Matthew D. Hartigan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed with finding of facts and judgment here for $199.50.

Opinion filed May 25, 1926.

Louis Grollman and Alvin E. Stein, for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### In the Matter of Irene M. Fono, Petitioner, v. James E. Allen, Jr., as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Issues in the proceeding remitted to the Special Term for hearing and determination and the stay which has been granted continued until the entry of a final order, without costs. (See *Mutter of Haynal*v. *Board of Regents,*19 A D 2d 204). Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.
- Postsecondary Degree Completion Rates Among Students on the Upward Bound/Upward Bound Math-Science to Student Support Services Pathway PDF (957KB)
- Fast Facts Report for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs: 2017–18
- Current Low-Income Levels
- Prior-Year Low-Income Levels
- Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs Postsecondary Outcomes Report  PDF (3.23MB)
- A Profile of the Federal TRIO Programs and Child Care Access Means Parents in School Program:  2008 MS Word (446K) | PDF (267K)
- Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Program Outcomes for Participants Expected to Graduate High School in 2004-05, With Supporting Data From 2005-06  PDF (256K) | MS Word (1.37MB)
- Program Profiles    - A Profile of the Upward Bound Program: 2000-2001 MS Word (2.5MB) | PDF (1MB)
- Program Evaluation    - The Impact of Regular Upward Bound: Results from the Third Follow-up Data Collection (2004)
- Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) Applicant and Grantee Resources

TRIO Home
## Timeline

Competitions  are held annually, pending the availability of funds.

The FY 2024 program competition is **now open**. The deadline to apply is **March 29, 2024**. 

## Federal Register Notice

- Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards  dated January 29, 2024 |  PDF

## Current Application

Applications for the FY 2024 DDRA program were submitted through the G5 system at http://www.G5.gov

Funding Opportunity Number:  ED-GRANTS-012924-001

-  FY 2024 DDRA Application Instructions: MS Word (621K)  

## Tips and Assistance

The FY 2024 DDRA program pre-application Technical Assistance Webinar will be available to stream  on IFLE’s YouTube channel on February 15, 2024. The webinar will cover a variety of topics, including DDRA program requirements, selection criteria, and frequently asked questions. In addition to the recording posted on February 15, there will also be the following sessions listen below. Please be sure to watch the prerecorded or live Technical Assistance Webinar prior to joining either Question and Answer session. 

- February 20 3:00-4:15 PM Eastern Time LIVE Technical Assistance Webinar –  Link to Join Feb. 20 Webinar
- February 22 3:00-4:15 PM Eastern Time LIVE Question and Answer Session #1 for Fellowship Applicants (PhD students) –  Link to Join Feb. 22 Webinar
- March 7 4:00-5:15 PM Eastern Time LIVE Question and Answer Session #2 for Project Directors Applicants (Institutional Project Directors) –  Link to Join March 7 Webinar
- A DDRA Fellow Alumni Panel Discussion and Application Tips webinar is also available to stream at  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Da5YM-ROF4U

## Application Contacts

Dr. Pamela J. MaimerInternational and Foreign Language EducationU.S. Department of EducationFulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Program Telephone: (202) 453-6891 E-mail: ddra@ed.gov

Amy MarrionInternational and Foreign Language EducationU.S. Department of EducationFulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad ProgramTelephone: (202) 453-5628E-mail: ddra@ed.gov

Carla White International and Foreign Language Education U.S. Department of Education Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Program Telephone: (202) 453-7502 E-mail: ddra@ed.gov

DDRA Home | IFLE Home | Discretionary Grant Application Packages
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARRICK W. BAILEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 198 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of February, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### The Atlanta & West Point Railroad Company *vs.*Johnson.

To charge upon a question not warranted by the testimony was error.

Warner, Chief Justice.
**2016 NAM Program Discretionary Grant Competition**

**GPRA Performance Measures**

The Department has developed the following GPRA performance measures for evaluating the overall effectiveness of the NAM program:

· **Measure 1**:  The number and percentage of English learners (ELs) served by the program who score proficient or above on the state reading assessment.

· **Measure 2**:  The number and percentage of ELs served by the program who are making progress in learning English as measured by the State approved English language proficiency assessment. 

· **Measure 3**:  The number and percentage of ELs served by the program who are attaining proficiency in *English as measured by the State approved English language proficiency assessment. (Note:  Data from local assessments are acceptable for evaluation under a performance measure, only in cases in which a grantee is in a state that is undergoing an assessment transition.)*

· **Measure 4**:  The number and percentage of students served by a NAM grant who are enrolled in Native language instruction programs.

· **Measure 5**:  The number and percentage of students making progress in learning a Native language, as determined by each grantee, including through measures such as performance tasks, portfolios, and pre and post-tests.

· **Measure 6:** The number and percentage of students who are attaining proficiency in a Native language as determined by each grantee, including through measures such as performance tasks, portfolios, and pre- and post-tests.

· **Measure 7**:  For programs that received competitive preference points, the number and percentage of preschool children ages three and four enrolled in the program.

· **Measure 8**: For programs that received competitive preference points, the number and percentage of preschool children ages three and four who are screened for developmental or cognitive delays. 

· **Measure 9**:  For programs that received competitive preference points, the number and percentage of coordination contacts with between elementary schools and early learning programs to improve coordination and transition of children from preschool to kindergarten.

2.24.2016
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 161 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 161

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
 Protection Agency relating to ``New Source Performance Standards for 
  the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National 
   Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Synthetic 
 Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Group I & II Polymers and 
                           Resins Industry''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2024

  Mr. Higgins of Louisiana submitted the following joint resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
 Protection Agency relating to ``New Source Performance Standards for 
  the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National 
   Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Synthetic 
 Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Group I & II Polymers and 
                           Resins Industry''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ``New 
Source Performance Standards for the Synthetic Organic Chemical 
Manufacturing Industry and National Emission Standards for Hazardous 
Air Pollutants for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing 
Industry and Group I & II Polymers and Resins Industry'' (89 Fed. Reg. 
42932 (May 16, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```