alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Oversight (CO), pursuant to National Science Foundation regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, February 3, 2021 from 12:00-1:00 p.m. EST.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Committee Chair's opening remarks; review and approve a handbook describing CO activity; discuss priority items from the workplan for the CO's broader impacts inquiry; discuss topics for the Chair's upcoming meeting with the Committee on Equal Opportunity in Science and Engineering (CEOSE); consider broader impacts as a part of NSF's strategic plan under development; and Committee Chair's closing remarks.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Ann Bushmiller, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Telephone: 703/292-7000. To listen to this teleconference, members of the public must send an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference. The National Science Board Office will send requesters a toll-free dial-in number. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.jsp#sunshine.*                         Please refer to the National Science Board website at                               ( print page 7577)    *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2021-02084 Filed 1-27-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### National Biscuit Company, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.—

Appeal dismissed unless printed records and briefs are filed and served on or before December 20, 1960. All briefs must be filed and served on or before December 23, 1960 if appeal is to be on January 1961 Term Calendar.
## FY 2023

Appropriation: $3,303,683New Awards: 13Average New Award: $124,922Continuation Awards: 18Average Continuation Award: $93,316

## FY 2022

## FY 2021

Appropriation: $2,936,969Continuation Awards: 32

## FY 2020

Appropriation: $2,857,604New Awards: 32

## FY 2019

## FY 2018

## FY 2017

No new awards.

## FY 2016

Appropriation:  $2,928,430New Awards: 24Average New Award:  $94,060Total New Awards: $2,257,434Continuation awards: 5Average Continuation Awards: $134,199Total Continuation Awards: $670,996

## FY 2015

Appropriation:  $2,928,430New Awards:  0Continuation Awards: 31Average Continuation Award: $94,465

## FY 2014

Appropriation:  $3,222,864New Awards:  31Average New Award: $91,691Total New Awards: $2,842,430Continuation awards: 3Average Continuation Award: $126,811Total Continuation Awards: $380,434

## FY 2013

Appropriation: $1,569,620New Awards: 0Continuation awards: 17Average Continuation Award: $92,331
225.7020-3 Exceptions. The prohibition in 225.7020-2 does not apply if— ( a ) The person has a valid license to operate in Venezuela issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury; or
( b ) The acquisition is related to the operation and maintenance of the U.S. Government's consular office and diplomatic posts in Venezuela.
[87 FR 31960, May 26, 2022]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits discrimination based on age in programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. The U.S. Department of Education gives financial assistance to schools and colleges. The Age Discrimination regulation describes conduct that violates the Act. The Age Discrimination regulation is enforced by the Office for Civil Rights and is in the Code of Federal Regulations at 34 CFR Part 110.

 The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 does not cover employment discrimination. Complaints of employment discrimination based on age may be filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

The regulations under the Age Discrimination Act, however, allow you to file a claim in Federal court under that law only after (1) 180 days have passed since you file your complaint with OCR and OCR has made no finding, or (2) OCR issues a finding in favor of the recipient. In the latter case, OCR will promptly notify you and remind you of your right to file in court.

The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits retaliation for filing a complaint with OCR or for advocating for a right protected by the Act.

Links to Age Discrimination Act and its implementing regulations:
                          - 42 USC 6101        : Statement of purpose (USCode.house.gov)
                          - 34 CFR Part 110

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 3009.507-1 Solicitation clause.

The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as (HSAR) 3052.209-72, Organizational Conflict of Interest, in solicitations and contracts where a potential organizational conflict of interest exists and mitigation may be possible. The contracting officer shall ensure the conditions enumerated in (FAR) 48 CFR subpart 9.5 warrant inclusion. The contracting officer shall include the information required by (FAR) 48 CFR 9.507-1 and (HSAR) 3052.209-72(a).

[71 FR 25769, May 2, 2006, as amended at 86 FR 17315, Apr. 2, 2021]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 7230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2791]

[[Page 7230]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement

Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, 
Interior.

ACTION: List of Restricted Joint Bidders; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and 
Enforcement published a notice in the Federal Register on January 24, 
2011, entitled: ``List of Restricted Joint Bidders'' that contained an 
error. We are correcting the names of oil companies listed under Group 
VIII in that notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel T. Cable, 703-787-1322.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 24, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-1319, 
on page 4129, correct ``Summary: Group VIII'' section to read:
    Group VIII. Statoil ASA, Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC; Statoil USA 
E&P, Inc.; Statoil Gulf Properties Inc.

    Dated: January 31, 2011.
Michael R. Bromwich,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and 
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-2791 Filed 2-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cybrdi Inc. (“We") for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xue Bu, the principal
financial officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of us


Date:
      May 17, 2010
                  
                  /s/
      Xue BuName:
      Xue Bu,
                    Principal
      Financial Officer
#### Dongxu CONG; Lina Chen, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75094.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 9, 2008.

Filed June 2, 2008.

Richard M. Loew, Aquino *&*Aquino, South Pasadena, CA, for Petitioners.

Jacob A. Bashyrov, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security. San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: NOONAN, W. FLETCHER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

The adverse credibility determination of the Immigration Judge (IJ) was based on misstatements by the IJ of the evidence in the record, on insignificant omissions in petitioner Dongxu Cong’s declaration, on speculation and conjecture about how petitioners obtained their visas, and on speculation and conjecture about the Chinese government’s failure to stop petitioners from leaving the country. These reasons do not constitute substantial evidence to support the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. *See Singh v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir.2006); *Mamouzian v. Ashcroft,*390 F.3d 1129, 1137 (9th Cir.2004); *Mendez-Efrain v. INS,*813 F.2d 279, 283 (9th Cir.1987). Therefore, petitioners did not need to provide corroborating evidence, and the availability of such evidence was irrelevant to their claims. *See Guo v. Ashcroft,*361 F.3d 1194, 1201 (9th Cir.2004); *Ladha v. INS,*215 F.3d *686889, 901 (9th Cir.2000); *see also*8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1) (B) (ii) — (iii); *cf. id.*§ 1252(b)(4)(D). Because a reasonable factfinder would be compelled to conclude that petitioners were credible, we grant the petition and remand for further proceedings pursuant to *INS v. Ventura, 537*U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

GRANTED and REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 23(a)



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-02655 and 33-65384) of Connectivity Technologies Inc. of our
report dated June 5, 1998 (except Note 19 as to which the date is June 30,
1998), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Connectivity
Technologies Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year
ended December 31, 1997.




                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
July 6, 1998
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 25 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education 

relating to accountability and State plans under the Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2017 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. WICKER, 

and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Education relating to accountability 

and State plans under the Elementary and Secondary 

Education Act of 1965. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Education relating to accountability and 

5 State plans under the Elementary and Secondary Edu6 cation Act of 1965 (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 86076 (NoVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:24 Mar 01, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ25.IS SJ25

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 25 IS 

1 vember 29, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or 

2 effect. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
246.708 Warranties of data. Obtain warranties on technical data when practicable and cost effective. Consider the factors in FAR 46.703 in deciding whether to obtain warranties of technical data. Consider the following in deciding whether to use extended liability provisions— ( 1 ) The likelihood that correction or replacement of the nonconforming data, or a price adjustment, will not give adequate protection to the Government; and
( 2 ) The effectiveness of the additional remedy as a deterrent against furnishing nonconforming data.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 30, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 30, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0356. BRANDON CASEY EISENBERG v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

12CR0497
# C_2018449EN.01001001.xml

| 13.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 449/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 449/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 December 2018

(2018/C 449/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1346 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4641 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3595 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1286 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,866 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2986 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6571 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,0893 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5732 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5170 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8693 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6573 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5577 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 280,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1475 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8155 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3895 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 562,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7538 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,714 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,2467 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,192 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3881 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,7639 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,6900 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1346

JPY

Japanese yen

128,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4641

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90135

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3595

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1286

ISK

Iceland króna

140,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,866

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2986

RON

Romanian leu

4,6571

TRY

Turkish lira

6,0893

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5732

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5170

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8693

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6573

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5577

KRW

South Korean won

1 280,62

ZAR

South African rand

16,1475

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8155

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3895

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 562,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7538

PHP

Philippine peso

59,714

RUB

Russian rouble

75,2467

THB

Thai baht

37,192

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3881

MXN

Mexican peso

22,7639

INR

Indian rupee

81,6900

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# C_2018039EN.01000201.xml

| 2.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 February 2018

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 February 2018

(2018/C 39/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2459 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4428 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87520 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8030 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1603 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 125,01 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5705 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,267 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1543 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6548 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6677 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5567 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5348 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7429 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6944 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6352 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 334,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8245 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8451 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4325 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 717,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8640 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,330 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,1220 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,071 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9488 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1310 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,7660 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2459

JPY

Japanese yen

136,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4428

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87520

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8030

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1603

ISK

Iceland króna

125,01

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5705

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,267

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1543

RON

Romanian leu

4,6548

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6677

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5567

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5348

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7429

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6944

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6352

KRW

South Korean won

1 334,46

ZAR

South African rand

14,8245

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8451

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4325

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 717,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8640

PHP

Philippine peso

64,330

RUB

Russian rouble

70,1220

THB

Thai baht

39,071

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9488

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1310

INR

Indian rupee

79,7660

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
#### 249.7002 [Reserved]
#### 237.171-1 Scope.

This section prescribes policies to prevent the abuse of detainees, as required by Section 1092 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Pub. L. 108-375).

[70 FR 52033, Sept. 1, 2005]
# CA2018447EN.01000101.xml

| 12.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 447/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 447/1

---

NOTIFICATION OF VACANCY NOTICE FOR CHAIRPERSON OF THE EBA (GRADE AD 15) — PARIS, FRANCE — EBA TA 21/2018

(2018/C 447 A/01)

The European Banking Authority (EBA) is an independent European Union Authority established on 1 January 2011 by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

With a view to improving the functioning of the European Union internal market, the EBA contributes to ensuring a high quality, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision in its areas of competence. It also promotes public values such as the stability of the financial system, the transparency of markets and financial products, and the protection of depositors and investors.

It works to prevent regulatory arbitrage and guarantee a level playing field, strengthens international supervisory coordination, promotes supervisory convergence and provides advice to the Union institutions in the areas of banking, payments and e-money regulation and supervision, and related corporate governance, auditing and financial reporting issues.

The Chairperson is a full-time independent professional member of EBA staff. He/she will be accountable to the EBA Board of Supervisors and will report to the Board of Supervisors on an on-going basis on the development of the EBA activities.

Please consult our website for the detailed vacancy notice and procedure for application:

https://eba.europa.eu/about-us/careers

Applications including a curriculum vitae preferably in the Europass format, a motivation letter and a filled declaration form, dated and signed, must be submitted in English to the following address: EBAChair-Applications@eba.europa.eu by 11 January 2019 at 12.00 noon London time.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12).

---
**EXHIBIT 23(a)**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-101638 and 333-122110) pertaining to the various stock option, employee stock purchase, and other stock incentive plans of our reports dated July 29, 2011, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Neogen Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Neogen Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May 31, 2011. 

   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Grand Rapids, Michigan 

July 29, 2011
#### 27.305 Administration of patent rights clauses.