alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: Martin, Michael (OST) 

Sent: 

To: 

Wednesday, February 09, 2011 11:37 AM 

Frazier, Gregory (OST) 

Subject: Kake clarification 

GregOK, so Dennis told me you two spoke this morning. So for final clarification- this is what should have been on Appendix 

C Page 1: 

Aircraft: Piper PA-31 Navajo aircraft, 9-seats, Piper PA-32 Navajo aircraft, 6.6 seats 

Rate per Eligible Flight: First year, PA-31 aircraft: $209; Second year, PA-31 aircraft: $225 

First year, PA-32 aircraft: $155; Second year, PA-32 aircraft: $165 

This footnote should have been included: 

When it substitutes aircraft, Air Excursions and the staff have agreed to a compensation rate of 9 seats for each 

operation with a PA-31, and 6. 6 seats for each PA-32. 

The numbers above have been rounded up, as we do for all orders. Let me know if there is anything else. 

Thanks, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Air Service (EAS} and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP} 

(202} 366-6494 

1
#### The People of the State of New York v. Leonard Wallach.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant's points with this court. That branch of the motion seeking a stay is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

**Author:** Abt Associates Inc. **Date Created: Date Modified:** 2/21/2012 **Purpose:** This file contains the Capacity Utilization, obtained through communications with the United States

Census Bureau, for selected industries. This data was used in creating capacity utilization profiles for 316(b) manufacturing industries. **File Contents: Worksheet**  **Contents** CapUtil Contains 2010 Q1 to 2011 Q3 capacity utilization for selected NAICS codes as well as the calculated

average annual capacity utilization. Also contains source information.

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3313 File Info 1Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

**1 2**  **3 4**  **5 6**  **7 8**  **9 10**  2010 Q12010 Q22010 Q32010 Q4 20102011 Q12011 Q22011 Q3 2011 NAICS RATE RATE RATE RATE AVG RATERATE RATE RATE AVG RATE 331111 74.52 76.13 67.98 66.7 71.3 74.40 72.49 71.8 72.91 331112 98.99 87.93 90.81 82.6 90.1 95.93 93.07 92.8 93.93 331210 51.30 58.50 57.98 59.2 56.7 71.53 66.19 69.1 68.92 331221 75.89 73.16 D D 74.5 D D D 331311 82.25 88.40 81.82 84.1 84.1 81.17 94.42 87.4 87.67 331312 64.99 62.69 61.58 62.8 63.0 64.48 85.52 94.7 81.57 33131447.52 46.09 44.01 42.3 45.0 54.40 53.04 47.4 51.61 331315 82.34 85.04 85.77 82.6 83.9 80.43 87.56 84.2 84.06 331222 57.82 66.07 58.9649.42 58.1 60.97 61.51 55.86 59.45

Source: Obtained through emails with U.S. Census Bureau: mary.s.stultz@census.gov Note: These data are being released on request, despite concerns about their quality. The Census Bureau's policy is not to withhold data that are available, unless releasing such data would violate confidentiality requirements. Because these data do not meet the criteria outlined in the Census Bureau's Statistical Quality Standard: Releasing Information Products, the Census Bureau recommends caution when using them.

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3313 CapUtil 1
#### 243.204-70 Definitization of change orders.
#### 36.508 Other contracts.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-8, Other Contracts, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.

[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34759, July 3, 1995]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a) Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-86189) of Wyndham International, Inc., and (b)
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-82325) of Wyndham
International, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Wyndham International, Inc. as of December
31, 1998 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1998
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1999.



                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 27, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 45 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 45

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Federal Government should not 
  encroach upon the States' constitutional right to govern aspects of 
                             election law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2023

  Mr. Santos submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Federal Government should not 
  encroach upon the States' constitutional right to govern aspects of 
                             election law.

Whereas article I, section 4 of the Constitution of the United States designates 
        to the States the right to govern aspects of election law; and
Whereas H.R. 1 of the 117th Congress amounts to Federal overreach: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This concurrent resolution may be cited as ``The Hands Off Our 
Election Resolution of 2023''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that Federal overreach into election 
law violates the States' constitutional right to govern aspects of 
election law as prescribed by article 1, section 4 of the Constitution 
of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
## Annual Performance Report

Grantees are required to submit an Annual Performance Report (APR) annually; the collection number is OMB 1840-0766. The APR is available to grantees October 1 of each calendar year, and closes 90 days thereafter. To review the reporting requirement for Title III and Title V Programs request access to an interactive training site under the training tab located on IS’ Information Management Performance System Portal at https://apr.ed.gov.  Once here you may select the requirements for each Title III and Title V program based on the institutional type (two-year or four-year).  This site is also available to grantees for training purposes and includes an APR user's manual.

To gain access to the APR at https://apr.ed.gov, project directors need the institution's Unit ID, PR Award ID, and a unique password provided by the Institutional  Service. Passwords are e-mailed to all grantee project directors designated on the grant award notification document 30 days before the collection period begins. Project directors of Title III and Title V grants are responsible for completing and managing the content of their respective annual report. During the data collection, assistance is available via a Help Desk to answer questions related to system operations, error messages, technical problems, report content, and program policy.

**Note:** If you are a project director and have responsibility for completing the annual report for your institution, please be sure you are designated on the official grant award notification and your e-mail and telephone number are listed correctly in the GAPS database.



## Final Performance Report

The online system will generate a final report from grantees’ individual annual reports for each grant ending September 30 of the collection period.  The online system generates the final performance so that reported data is consistent throughout the life cycle of grants and eliminates each grantee’s burden of having to compile a final report.



Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 06/22/2011
|-------------------------
36.602-5 Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. When authorized by the agency, either or both of the short processes described in this subsection may be used to select firms for contracts not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Otherwise, the procedures prescribed in 36.602-3 and 36.602-4 shall be followed. ( a ) *Selection by the board.* The board shall review and evaluate architect-engineer firms in accordance with 36.602-3, except that the selection report shall serve as the final selection list and shall be provided directly to the contracting officer. The report shall serve as an authorization for the contracting officer to commence negotiations in accordance with 36.606.
( b ) *Selection by the chairperson of the board.* When the board decides that formal action by the board is not necessary in connection with a particular selection, the following procedures shall be followed: ( 1 ) The chairperson of the board shall perform the functions required in 36.602-3.
( 2 ) The agency head or designated selection authority shall review the report and approve it or return it to the chairperson for appropriate revision.
( 3 ) Upon receipt of an approved report, the chairperson of the board shall furnish the contracting officer a copy of the report which will serve as an authorization for the contracting officer to commence negotiations in accordance with 36.606.
[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 48989, Nov. 28, 1989; 60 FR 34759, July 3, 1995]
#### In the Matter of Peter M., Petitioner, for a Judgment Declaring His Legitimacy. Andrew M. Cuomo, as Attorney General, Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 834]

Motion to vacate ex parte order denied for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Green and Pine, JJ.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                               | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Vocational and Adult Education Home |
|                                               |

## Adult Education Act, P.L. 100-297, as Amended                         by the National Literacy Act of 1997

 

MAY 1997

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### Daniel T. Miller, an Infant, by Mary L. Miller, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Carmen Penna, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Trial Term for defendant and against plaintiff Daniel T. Miller for no cause of action, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
# C_2019031EN.01000201.xml

| 25.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

24 January 2019

(2019/C 31/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1341 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4659 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87085 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2843 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1283 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 135,90 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7278 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,695 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 318,42 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2881 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7722 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,9895 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5967 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5160 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8988 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6731 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5430 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 281,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,6360 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7041 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4356 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 064,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6986 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,905 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,7868 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,985 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2869 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6031 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,6560 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1341

JPY

Japanese yen

124,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4659

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87085

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2843

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1283

ISK

Iceland króna

135,90

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7278

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,695

HUF

Hungarian forint

318,42

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2881

RON

Romanian leu

4,7722

TRY

Turkish lira

5,9895

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5967

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5160

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8988

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6731

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5430

KRW

South Korean won

1 281,18

ZAR

South African rand

15,6360

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7041

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4356

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 064,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6986

PHP

Philippine peso

59,905

RUB

Russian rouble

74,7868

THB

Thai baht

35,985

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2869

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6031

INR

Indian rupee

80,6560

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 180 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating 

to ‘‘Clean Energy for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations 

of Federal Buildings’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 2, 2024 

Mr. PALMER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Energy relating to ‘‘Clean Energy 

for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of 

Federal Buildings’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Energy relating to ‘‘Clean Energy for New 

5 Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of Federal 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 180 IH 

1 Buildings’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 35384 (May 1, 2024)), and such 

2 rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Isadore MISKAVIGE, Appellant, v. Harold BRADFORD, Jr., Michael Doshan, and George G. McPartlin, Appellees.

No. 82-1298.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 7, 1982.

Decided June 9, 1982.

David Miskavige, Isadore Miskavige, pro se.

Richard V. Wicka, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee Harold Bradford, Jr.

Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan, James F. Roegge, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee Michael Doshan.

James M. Rosenbaum, U. S. Atty., Ann D. Montgomery, Asst. U. S. Atty., D. Minn., Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.

Before BRIGHT, McMILLIAN and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant Isadore Miskavige seeks reversal of the district court’s order dismissing his diversity action on grounds of judicial immunity and res judicata.

Our review of the record convinces us that the district court’s1 order was correct. We affirm on the basis of that court’s well-reasoned memorandum opinion. *See*8th Cir.R. 14.

1

. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of the
Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, I, John
I. Bradshaw, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, President and
Treasurer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.


                                        /S/ John I. Bradshaw, Jr.
                                             Chief Executive Officer, President
                                              and Treasurer
#### Fiddlers Green Association, Inc., Respondent, v. Construction Corporation of Long Island, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Motion by respondent for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Was the order of this court, entered November 14, 1960, properly made? Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Key Staff

Don CrewsTelephone: (202) 453-7920E-mail: don.crews@ed.gov

**Mailing Address:**U.S. Department of Education, OPEInstitutional  ServiceNative American-serving Nontribal Institutions Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Room 4C140Washington, DC 20202

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov