alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 1);~ G)),e_

Date: May 19,2015 , / 

# L 

# --f
Meeting: O&G Methane Regulations

# ~ 

# t/../wJIJ:j / \)(**~** (l_

# \'A:::>**~>'!-** Rule(s)Dis<ussed: 

# f1J Jfy <:

_ 

# Q

Written Materials? Yes/No

- 

## J

# ~**~ -------.** 

I 4 1 • 

## _ c 

## J\ 

# G**\J.'\. Y\.~"**  Q Nam e Organization P m e Nu m b e r )**---- --** **-- --** **-- ---+** **---------------- ----** **-------- ~** 

._([ 4vl

## Gvw~ (!:-_.

# ~A~rv:;~~**~** J**es~i** 

# c &t 

# a**~** 

# '-" EPfl

_ 

# S; '4Yq 

# CJ**c.-~ c;;_\** **Yf tl...**  C 

### \v 

## C rtT.f
I I 2'.JL- )_'-f 

### '3

- (_lg__U.=L__**~01..---sy~-** 

## lG9 ,
b ?-6 

# tto 6<;l{l 1 

# l Zt'2_ 

# Jb. ;' tp{f



# __ j
# C_2017273EN.01000201.xml

| 18.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 August 2017

(2017/C 273/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1697 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4354 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90895 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5088 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1311 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3243 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,012 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,05 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2575 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5848 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1197 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4756 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4767 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1517 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6013 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5978 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4425 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8110 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4042 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 620,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0244 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,048 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,4730 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,893 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6986 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7198 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,0595 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1697

JPY

Japanese yen

128,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4354

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90895

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5088

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1311

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3243

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,012

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,05

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2575

RON

Romanian leu

4,5848

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1197

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4756

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4767

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1517

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6013

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5978

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,95

ZAR

South African rand

15,4425

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8110

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4042

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 620,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0244

PHP

Philippine peso

60,048

RUB

Russian rouble

69,4730

THB

Thai baht

38,893

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6986

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7198

INR

Indian rupee

75,0595

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 3052.217-97 Discharge of liens (USCG).

As prescribed in USCG guidance at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3017.9000(a) and (b), insert the following clause:

# Discharge of Liens (DEC 2003)

(a) The Contractor shall immediately discharge or cause to be discharged, any lien or right *in rem* of any kind, other than in favor of the Government, that exists or arises in connection with work done or materials furnished under this contract.

(b) If any such lien or right *in rem* is not immediately discharged, the Government, at the expense of the Contractor, may discharge, or cause to be discharged, the lien or right.

(End of clause)
#### 252.223-7004-252.223-7005 [Reserved]
Exhibit 99.1

       Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                 of Title 18 of the United States Code


I, Joseph F. Kruy, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
Cambex Corporation, certify that

(i) This quarterly report on Form 10QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(ii) The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Cambex Corporation.


Dated: May 15, 2003        /s/ Joseph F. Kruy
                             Joseph F. Kruy
                             President and Treasurer
                             [principal executive officer and
                              principal financial officer]


This certification accompanies this annual report pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Compny
for purposes of Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
02/04/2011 09:2? FAX 2024935142 FAA . n»o 

"^"^ •>• DMS glOOl/00 2 

fviSffiON., 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIAriON/'f FEB -L| A, Q- j i 

OfFTCE: OF HEARINGS ' ^ ^ 

WASHlNCj'lON, DC. 

IN rHE MATTER OJFREEDOM AIRHINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO.: (:PU9SW0005 

(CIVIL p.F;NAi;rY CASE) 

DMS FAA-200y-0980 

NOTICF OF SETTLEIvrRNT 

An Order On Siaius of Ca.se (the "Order") was issued on January 3, 2011 directing ihc parties lo notify 

the Court ri;g<irdiiig the status of pending settlement discussions. The fbllo>A'ing NoLice of Scttlemcrt is 

offered in satisfaclion of (he Order. Tlic parties have agreed upon seitlemeni. lerms which will be 

fuialized in the claims ;idmiais(ration procedures of Mesa's Bankruptcy case pending in (he United States 

liankiiiptey (."oiul for ihc .Soulliern L>i.siric( oT New York (Mesa Air Group, Inc. el al.. Case No.: 10-

10018 (MO)). 

mjtted (hi-s 28"' dny of January 2011 

llllrisLoptier J. Pappaioaiiou 

V.P, Legal Affairs 

Freedom Airl)nes, Inc. 

--P AP^iMG :"'>':cKP" 
+ DMS 121002/002 

f/SA Docket No. C.P09SW{)005 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S"W 

Washington, DC 20591 

Atlenlion: Hearing Docket Clwk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suuc 2W1000 

ONE COPY 

Annjenet Chennault, Complainant's Coun-Sel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601MeachaTnBlvd 

Fort Work, TX 76137 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Iransportaiion 

1200 New Jersey Avenue. SF, 

East BiiildinB Ground Floor, Room E-12-320 

Washington, DC 20590
# C_2017444EN.01000401.xml

| 23.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 444/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 444/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 444/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Germany

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 100th birthday anniversary of the great German statesman and Chancellor Helmut Schmidt (1918-2015)

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design portrays Helmut Schmidt in a characteristic pose as he engages in dialogue with his interlocutor. In semi-circle at the top right the inscription ‘HELMUT SCHMIDT’ and at the right side the years ‘1918-2015’. The mint mark of the respective mint appears underneath the years. At the left side is the code of the issuing country ‘D’ and underneath is the year of issuance ‘2018’. At the bottom there are the initials of the artist.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
  :

Estimated number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : January/February 2018

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
#### Camille Weisner, Respondent, v. Sidney Weisner, Appellant.

Order, entered on July 9, 1963, unanimously reversed upon the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and motion by plaintiff for an order directing defendant to pay additional sums on account of Summer camp expenses of the children denied, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant to be offset against the award of counsel fees and printing disbursements directed to be paid to respondent in connection with this appeal and limited to the amount of such award. By order of this court, rendered May 7, 1963, the defendant was directed to pay $300 weeldy for support of the children. The expenses for the children’s attendance at the Summer camp for an eight-week Summer season were estimated by respondent to be In the amount of $968. The award by the order of this court was intended to provide in full for the support of the children pending the trial of the action, and under the circumstances, there was no reasonable justification for an application for the increase thereof. The plaintiff should press for an early trial. (See *Bleiman*v. *Bleiman,*272 App. Div. 760.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
227.7103-9 Copyright. ( a ) *Copyright license.* ( 1 ) The clause at 252.227-7013, Rights in Technical Data—Other Than Commercial Products and Commercial Services, requires a contractor to grant or obtain for the Government license rights which permit the Government to reproduce data, distribute copies of the data, publicly perform or display the data or, through the right to modify data, prepare derivative works. The extent to which the Government, and others acting on its behalf, may exercise these rights varies for each of the standard data rights licenses obtained under the clause. When non-standard license rights in technical data will be negotiated, negotiate the extent of the copyright license concurrent with negotiations for the data rights license. Do not negotiate a copyright license that provides less rights than the standard limited rights license in technical data.
( 2 ) The clause at 252.227-7013 does not permit a contractor to incorporate a third party's copyrighted data into a deliverable data item unless the contractor has obtained an appropriate license for the Government and, when applicable, others acting on the Government's behalf, or has obtained the contracting officer's written approval to do so. Grant approval to use third party copyrighted data in which the Government will not receive a copyright license only when the Government's requirements cannot be satisfied without the third party material or when the use of the third party material will result in cost savings to the Government which outweigh the lack of a copyright license.
( b ) *Copyright considerations—acquisition of existing and special works.* See 227.7105 or 227.7106 for copyright considerations when acquiring existing or special works.
[60 FR 33471, June 28, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 6585, Jan. 31, 2023]
The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) announced today that it has entered into a resolution agreement with the Hampton, Virginia, City Schools after finding the division in violation of the civil rights laws enforced by OCR that prohibit retaliation for opposing discriminatory practices or for participating in OCR's complaint resolution process.

OCR found the division retaliated against a parent for advocating on behalf of her daughter, who is an elementary school student enrolled in and receiving special education services from a division school.  The retaliation occurred when the division effectively terminated the employment of the parent in the division.  Two federal civil rights laws protect parents from those discriminatory practices: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

The division entered into a resolution agreement after OCR recently notified it that failure to remedy the violation would result in the initiation of an enforcement action.

"I am grateful that the division has now committed to put its retaliation behind it and move forward supportive of all students' and parents' rights to advocate for their civil rights," said Catherine E. Lhamon, assistant secretary for civil rights.  "Safeguarding parents' ability to raise concerns about their children's education without fear of retaliation is a core component of civil rights compliance in schools."

Under the agreement, the division agreed to take actions to remedy the violation, including the following:

- Amend the division's policies to prohibit retaliation against individuals who have engaged in activities protected by federal law and identify the procedure for filing a complaint alleging retaliation.
- Disseminate a memorandum to all division administrators that provides information on unlawful retaliation.
- Post a notice stating that the division prohibits retaliation against individuals who have engaged in activities protected by federal law.  The notice will also reference the procedure for filing a complaint alleging retaliation and state that the division was found by OCR to have engaged in unlawful retaliation.
- Provide training to administrators on retaliation.
- Compensate, as appropriate, the Complainant for the expenses that she incurred as a result of the division's retaliation during the 2014-2015 and 2015-16 school years.

Read the Resolution Letter PDF (229.65K) | Read the Resolution Agreement PDF (101.18K)

Top
241.501-70 Additional clauses. ( a ) If the Government must execute a superseding contract and capital credits, connection charge credits, or termination liability exist, use the clause at 252.241-7000, Superseding Contract.
( b ) Use the clause at 252.241-70001, Government Access, when the clause at FAR 52.241-5, Contractor's Facilities, is used.
# C_2018412EN.01000301.xml

| 14.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

13 November 2018

(2018/C 412/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1261 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4613 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86945 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2284 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1368 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 139,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5563 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,939 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,89 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2992 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6612 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,1857 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5628 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4888 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8161 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6684 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5559 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 277,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2504 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8354 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4238 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 692,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7229 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,885 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,1990 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,178 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2479 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0152 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,8390 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1261

JPY

Japanese yen

128,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4613

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86945

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2284

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1368

ISK

Iceland króna

139,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5563

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,939

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,89

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2992

RON

Romanian leu

4,6612

TRY

Turkish lira

6,1857

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5628

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4888

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8161

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6684

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5559

KRW

South Korean won

1 277,21

ZAR

South African rand

16,2504

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8354

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4238

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 692,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7229

PHP

Philippine peso

59,885

RUB

Russian rouble

76,1990

THB

Thai baht

37,178

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2479

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0152

INR

Indian rupee

81,8390

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
25.703-3 Prohibition on contracting with entities that export sensitive technology to Iran. ( a ) The head of an executive agency may not enter into or extend a contract for the procurement of goods or services with a person that exports certain sensitive technology to Iran, as determined by the President, and has an active exclusion in the System for Award Management at *http://www.sam.gov* (22 U.S.C. 8515).
( b ) Each offeror must represent that it does not export any sensitive technology to the government of Iran or any entities or individuals owned or controlled by, or acting on behalf or at the direction of, the government of Iran.
( c ) *Exception for trade agreements.* The representation requirement of paragraph (b) of this subsection does not apply if the acquisition is subject to trade agreements and the offeror certifies that all the offered products are designated country end products or designated country construction material (see subpart 25.4).
[76 FR 68031, Nov. 2, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 188, Jan. 3, 2012; 77 FR 73519, Dec. 10, 2012; 78 FR 37679, June 21, 2013; 78 FR 46783, Aug. 1, 2013; 83 FR 48697, Sept. 26, 2018]
#### 27.204-1 Use of patented technology under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

When questions arise with regard to use of patented technology under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the contracting officer should consult with legal counsel. Note that Article 20.6(a) of the Agreement discusses public health and pharmaceuticals.

[87 FR 73892, Dec. 1, 2022]
# C_2018146EN.01000501.xml

| 26.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 April 2018

(2018/C 146/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2185 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4489 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87380 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4220 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1986 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7050 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2241 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6453 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,0008 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6118 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5704 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5625 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7232 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6199 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 320,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2415 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7048 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4185 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 961,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7712 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,773 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,7073 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,486 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2705 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2194 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,6095 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2185

JPY

Japanese yen

133,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4489

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87380

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4220

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1986

ISK

Iceland króna

123,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7050

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,466

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2241

RON

Romanian leu

4,6453

TRY

Turkish lira

5,0008

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6118

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5704

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5625

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7232

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6199

KRW

South Korean won

1 320,61

ZAR

South African rand

15,2415

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7048

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4185

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 961,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7712

PHP

Philippine peso

63,773

RUB

Russian rouble

75,7073

THB

Thai baht

38,486

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2705

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2194

INR

Indian rupee

81,6095

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Anthony Mario, Jr., Respondent, v Mary M. Mario, Appellant

Order unanimously modified, and as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Prior to the divorce of the parties in 1973 they were the owners by the entirety of real estate constituting the marital premises. Following the entry of the divorce decree, plaintiff brought an action for partition (see *Mario v Mario,*51 AD2d 428) and eventually obtained an order directing that the premises be sold. Plaintiff purchased the property at the sale and the Referee credited him for payments of taxes, insurance premiums and mortgage principal and interest which he had made in connection with the premises subsequent to the divorce. The Referee recommended that the balance of the proceeds be divided equally between the parties. Defendant appeals from Special Term’s order confirming the Referee’s report insofar as it permits credit to the plaintiff for the payment of such expenses. We find that the plaintiff is not entitled to reimbursement for the tax and insurance payments inasmuch as he was obligated to make them by a specific directive in the divorce decree and there has been no modification of that provision. The credit for these items is equivalent to a retroactive modification and thereby fails to accommodate a "concern for the proper and judicious enforcement of the directives in [that] judgment” *(Ripp v Ripp,*38 AD2d 65, 70, affd 32 NY2d 755; see *Naphtali v Naphtali,*3 AD2d 731). Plaintiff contends that since the Justice who ordered the distribution also granted the divorce, he was better positioned to consider the equitable factors between the parties (see *Ripp v Ripp, supra).*While this is generally true, the record here, made almost four years after the entry of the divorce decree, fails to demonstrate any equitable consideration upon which the court may have relied. Additionally, the record fails to explain away the Trial Justice’s express indication as reflected in proceedings of June 23, 1975 that plaintiff would receive credit only for the mortgage payments *(Mario v Mario,*51 AD2d 428, *supra).*With respect to the principal and interest payments on the mortgage, the usual equitable rules of distribution are applicable (see *Hosford v Hosford,*273 App Div 659, 662) and plaintiff was properly credited for these expenditures (see *Johnson v Depew,*33 AD2d 645; *Bailey v Mormino,*6 AD2d 993). We thus conclude that defendant is entitled to receive from plaintiff the sum of $2,275.36, which sum represents one half of the total amount credited to plaintiff for the payment of taxes and insurance premiums. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court — partition, referee’s report.) Present— Moule, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Schnepp, JJ.
# Slate