alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(December 19, 1960)

#### Baron’s Cove Inn, Inc., Respondent, v. Daniel F. Mulvihill, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before January 13, 1961. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Additional typographical corrections beyond errata and supplemental changes made during compilation of final S211b Tier 2 Exposure Report and Appendices. Title Page (line 3) – Final Report changed to Compiled Final Report . Page iv – revised Table of Contents pagination (only) of Appendices A to I and added footnote “ *Appendix pagination corresponds to Adobe Reader page count index. ” . Page v – Figure E - 6 changed to E - 5 . Page vii – Figures 5 - 3 - 2 & 5 - 3 - 3 changed to 5.3 - 2 & 5.3 - 3 . Page x – Table 5.3.4 changed to 5.3 - 4 . Page ES - 15 (line 20) – “...MTBE, formaldehyde, ethanol, acetaldehyde, and CO...” Page ES - 16 (line 20) – “... acetaldehyde, ethanol, Page ES - 17 - Figure E - 5 updated to include acetaldehyde data (e.g., Figure 4.3 - 2). and CO...” Page ES - 17 (li ne 1) - Figure E - 6 caption changed to E - 5 . Page ES - 17 – Table E - 2 updated to include acetaldehyde data (e.g., Table 5.4 - 4). Page 1 - 17 – Figure 1.3.1 - 2 benzene title : Chicago, Winter 2004.xls changed to Chicago, Winter 2004 . Page 3 - 8 – Table 3 - 4 ME 12 line changed to non - i talicized type font. Page 5 - 7 - Table 5.3 - 1 caption, “HCHO is divided by 10 for scale” is changed to Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde divided by 10 for scale . Page 5 - 8 – Figure 5 - 3 - 2 changed to Figure 5.3 - 2 . Pa ge 5 - 9 – Figure 5 - 3 - 3 changed to Figure 5.3 - 3 . Appendices – Appendix title pages added to appendices A to I.
23.104 General procedures. ( a ) *Maximum extent practicable.* If the requiring activity submits a written justification addressing the reasons described in 23.103(a)(1), the contracting officer may consider it not practicable to procure sustainable products or services. A written justification may be for a specific product or service or at the line item or contract level. The contracting officer shall maintain the written justification in the contract file.
( b ) *Identification.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the contracting officer shall ensure the solicitation and contract identifies— ( i ) The sustainable products and services, including the purchasing program and type of product or service, that are applicable to the acquisition, as identified by the requiring activity; and
( ii ) Any products and services that are not subject to the requirements of this subpart and the clause at 52.223-23, Sustainable Products and Services, based on the written justification under paragraph (a) of this section, an exception at 23.105, or an exemption at 23.106.
( 2 ) The requirement in paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not apply if the justification, exception, or exemption covers the entirety of the contract action requirements.
( c ) *Prioritization.* Agencies shall prioritize sustainable products and services as follows: ( 1 ) Procure products and services that meet applicable statutory purchasing program requirements (see 23.107). When both an EPA-designated item (see 23.107-1) and a biobased product in a USDA-designated product category (see 23.107-2) could be used for the same purposes, and there is not an EPA-designated item that is also a biobased product in a USDA-designated product category that meets the agency's needs, procure the EPA-designated item.
( 2 ) Consistent with other statutory procurement requirements, prioritize multi-attribute sustainable products and services, which are those that meet applicable statutory purchasing program requirements (see 23.107) and one or more required EPA purchasing programs (see 23.108).
( 3 ) If no statutory purchasing program requirements apply, procure sustainable products and services that meet required EPA purchasing program requirements (see 23.108).
( d ) *Resource.* The Green Procurement Compilation (GPC) available at *https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement* provides a comprehensive list of sustainable products and services and other related sustainable acquisition guidance. In addition to the resources identified for each purchasing program listed in 23.107 and 23.108, agencies should consult the GPC when determining which purchasing programs apply to a specific product or service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   414
<PP&E>                                          12,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (10)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              826
<BONDS>                                          1,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,193
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,896
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.014)
        





</TABLE>
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

GASTON, HOUTZ, and STARITA

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Cortlyn D. HARRIS

Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 202000102

Decided: 26 August 2020

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: 

Chad Temple

Sentence adjudged 27 February 2020 by a general court-martial convened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military 

judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement 

for 120 days and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant:

Captain Daniel J. McCoy, JAGC, USN

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Harris, No. 202000102

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. 

§§ 859, 866 (2018).

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
#### 27.001 Definition.

*United States* , as used in this part, means the 50 States and the District of Columbia, U.S. territories and possessions, Puerto Rico, and the Northern Mariana Islands.
#### Sherlea Schoepfel, Respondent, v. Joseph Schoepfel, Appellant.

Motion granted and time for filing and serving records and briefs extended to January 18, 1961.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 528 

Designating the week of May 20 through May 26, 2018, as ‘‘National Public 

Works Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2018 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mrs. 

CAPITO, Mr. CARPER, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. HASSAN, 

Mr. BARRASSO, Ms. SMITH, Mr. KING, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mrs. 

FISCHER) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of May 20 through May 26, 2018, 

as ‘‘National Public Works Week’’. 

Whereas public works infrastructure, facilities, and services 

are of vital importance to the health, safety, and wellbeing of the people of the United States; 

Whereas the public works infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts 

of public works professionals, including engineers and administrators, who represent State and local governments 

throughout the United States; 

Whereas public works professionals design, build, operate, 

and maintain the transportation systems, water infrastructure, sewage and refuse disposal systems, public 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 528 ATS 

buildings, and other structures and facilities that are 

vital to the people and communities of the United States; 

and 

Whereas understanding the role that public infrastructure 

plays in protecting the environment, improving public 

health and safety, contributing to economic vitality, and 

enhancing the quality of life of every community of the 

United States is in the interest of the people of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of May 20 through May 

3 26, 2018, as ‘‘National Public Works Week’’; 

4 (2) recognizes and celebrates the important 

5 contributions that public works professionals make 

6 every day to improve— 

7 (A) the public infrastructure of the United 

8 States; and 

9 (B) the communities that public works 

10 professionals serve; and 

11 (3) urges individuals and communities through12 out the United States to join with representatives of 

13 the Federal Government and the American Public 

14 Works Association in activities and ceremonies that 

15 are designed— 

16 (A) to pay tribute to the public works pro17 fessionals of the United States; and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 528 ATS 

1 (B) to recognize the substantial contribu2 tions that public works professionals make to 

3 the United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Key Staff

**Wendy Lawrence, M.Ed.**Competition Program ManagerCenter of Educational Excellence for Black Teachers at HBCUs (CEEBT) ProgramPhone:	202-453-7821Email: Wendy.Lawrence@ed.gov

**Mailing Address:**Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary EducationU.S. Department of Education, OPECenter of Educational Excellence for Black Teachers at HBCUs (CEEBT) Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Mail Stop LBJ-2B162Washington, DC 20202**E-mail:**CEEBT@ed.gov

FIPSE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6187

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GERALD DAVID DAVAGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CR-94-41)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald David Davage, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne A. Battaglia, United

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gerald David Davage appeals the district court's order denying

his motion for provision of a transcript. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Davage, No. CR-94-41 (D. Md. Nov. 4 & Dec. 24,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### M. S. HUEY CO. v. ROTHFELD.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Evidence—Conclusion of Witness.

On the issue whether a foreign corporation was doing business in the state during a specified period, the conclusion of an agent of the corporation that it was, was not evidence of that fact.

3. Appeal—Presumptions.

Where a judgment may have been rendered on either of two issues, one of which was insufficiently established, the court on appeal will not assume that it was based on the other issue.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

Action by the M. S. Huey Company against Isaac Rothfeld. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

M. G. Gonterman, for appellant.

A. B. Schleimer, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

The action was for goods sold and delivered, and the determination for the defendant may have proceeded upon the court’s acceptance of the evidence given to prove a justified rejection of the goods, or upon the affirmative defense that the plaintiff, a foreign corporation, was not entitled to maintain the action for failure to procure the statutory certificate. As to this defense, the issue was whether the plaintiff was doing business within the state when the claim in suit arose, and to prove the affirmative the defendant called an agent of the plaintiff, and, over objection, was permitted to ask him whether the corporation was “doing business within the state during the appropriate period.” The witness answered that it was, and it appears from the rulings that the answer was deemed to be proof of the fact.

This evidence was the witness’ conclusion upon the ultimate fact in issue, and the question substituted the opinion of the witness for the opinion of the trial court upon the evidentiary facts which should have been presented to the court. Jaton v. Brentwood, 11 Misc. Rep. 325, 32 N. Y. Supp. 131. Doubtless a question like this would be unobjectionable in a case where the fact of doing business, in the usual understanding of the term, merely had a bearing upon some issue, and was not itself the issue to be determined/ but here the ultimate fact of doing business was to be proven by evidence of what was done, not by the conclusions of a witness. We cannot assume *884that the judgment was rendered upon some ground not involving the affirmative defense, and, for the error pointed out, there must be a new trial of the cause.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John J, Yazum, Also Known as Larry Jamison, Appellant.

Motion to resettle order, dated July 2, 1963, granted. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ. [18 A D 2d 409.]
# C_2017128EN.01000301.xml

| 22.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 April 2017

(2017/C 128/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0698 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6390 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0680 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2478 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,933 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,18 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2727 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5437 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9001 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4219 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4413 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3190 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5277 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4948 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 215,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0587 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3666 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4575 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 249,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7061 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,306 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 60,2565 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,790 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3683 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1459 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,1185 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0698

JPY

Japanese yen

116,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83720

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6390

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0680

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2478

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,933

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,18

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2727

RON

Romanian leu

4,5437

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9001

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4219

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4413

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3190

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5277

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4948

KRW

South Korean won

1 215,07

ZAR

South African rand

14,0587

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3666

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4575

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 249,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7061

PHP

Philippine peso

53,306

RUB

Russian rouble

60,2565

THB

Thai baht

36,790

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3683

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1459

INR

Indian rupee

69,1185

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit
32.3








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CENTRAL
ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY


(required
by Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)








In
connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2008 of Central Illinois Public Service Company (the “Registrant”) as
filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), each undersigned officer of the Registrant does
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








Date:  November
10, 2008








/s/ Scott A.
Cisel


Scott A.
Cisel


Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)











/s/ Warner L.
Baxter


Warner L.
Baxter


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
# C_2017052EN.01000401.xml

| 18.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 February 2017

(2017/C 52/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0650 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4334 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4478 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0637 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8645 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,32 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3305 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5223 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9117 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3892 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3929 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2659 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4809 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5086 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 224,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,9357 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3134 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4410 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 199,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7424 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,309 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,9668 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,270 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2928 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8050 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,4615 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0650

JPY

Japanese yen

120,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4334

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85720

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4478

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0637

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8645

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,32

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3305

RON

Romanian leu

4,5223

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9117

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3892

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3929

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2659

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4809

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5086

KRW

South Korean won

1 224,76

ZAR

South African rand

13,9357

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3134

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4410

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 199,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7424

PHP

Philippine peso

53,309

RUB

Russian rouble

61,9668

THB

Thai baht

37,270

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2928

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8050

INR

Indian rupee

71,4615

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---