alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Patent

## Title
Electrically grounding of non-metallic parts

## Abstract

It will thus be seen that the objects set forth above, among those made apparent from the preceding description, are efficiently attained. Since certain changes may be made in carrying out the above method and in the constructions set forth without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

## Background
## Claims

privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. Apparatus for recovering heat energy from a hot exhaust gas containing a corrosive constituent which is condensable at and below a corrosive condensation temperature, comprising, in combination: a first heat exchanger connected to receive said hot exhaust gas at a first temperature and operative to cool said exhaust gas by transferring heat to a fluid and to discharge said exhaust gas at a second temperature which is above said corrosive condensation temperature and which is below a material limit temperature; and a second heat exchanger connected to receive exhaust gas which has been discharged from said first heat exchanger and operative to cool at least a portion of said exhaust gas by transferring heat to a fluid to a third temperature below said corrosive condensation temperature, said second heat exchanger containing a corrosion-protection material, heat exchanging, said material limit temperature being the gas temperature at and above which said corrosion-protection material is subject to thermal damage, said first temperature being above the material limit temperature.

2. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said corrosion-protection material comprises a fluoroplastic.

3. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said first temperature exceeds said material limit temperature.

4. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said second heat exchanger comprises a plurality of generally horizontally extending metal tubes having coverings formed of said corrosion-protection material.

5. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said second heat exchanger comprises a housing having its inside walls lined with a corrosion-protection material and a plurality of generally horizontally extending metal tubes having coverings formed of said corrosion-protection material.
3001.102 Statement of Guiding Principles for the Federal Acquisition System. ( d ) The FAR and this supplement are to be interpreted permissively, if consistent with statutory and regulatory requirements, policy, and sound professional judgment.
The Hazards Data Distribution System Is Updated 
�

Introduction 

After a major disaster, a satellite image or a collection 

of aerial photographs of the event is frequently the fastest, 

most effective way to determine its scope and severity. The 

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Emergency Operations Portal 

provides emergency first responders and support personnel with 

easy access to imagery and geospatial data, geospatial Web 

services, and a digital library focused on emergency operations. 

Imagery and geospatial data are accessed through the Hazards 

Data Distribution System (HDDS). HDDS historically provided 

data access and delivery services through nongraphical 

interfaces that allow emergency response personnel to select 

and obtain pre-event baseline data and (or) event/disaster 

response data. First responders are able to access full-resolution 

GeoTIFF images or JPEG images at medium- and low-quality 

compressions through ftp downloads. 

USGS HDDS home page: http://hdds.usgs.gov/hdds2/

Hazards Data Distribution System Enhancements 

HDDS has recently been upgraded to include a graphical 

interface that provides a simplified capability for interactive 

searching and visualization of the HDDS holdings, based 

upon a particular event or geographic area of interest. This 

new graphical HDDS interface will run concurrently with 

the existing (directory-based) HDDS interface, to provide an 

important additional option for data discovery and access by the 

emergency response community. New features include: 

•		 Search by event 

•		 Search by geographic coordinates 

•		 Search by State and county 

•		Easily refinable search on results 

•		 Access to all Emergency Operations event imagery - 

"Ad-hoc" and ingested data
	

•		RSS XML feeds for ingested data 

•		Item basket for data requests 

•		 Separate production and development environments 

•		 User feedback capability 

Subsequent releases will include the following: 

• Registration service authentication for restricted data 

Figure 1. Screen capture of USGS Hazards Data Distribution

System (HDDS) search criteria Web page.

•		 Download manager for multiple tiles 

•		Browse overlay capability 

•		 Database replication for added system stability 

•		 Filtering by sensor and date of acquisition 

For more information, please contact: 

Brenda K. Jones 

Disaster Response Coordinator 

USGS EROS Center 

47914 252nd St 

Sioux Falls, SD 57198 

Telephone: 605–594–6503 

Fax: 605–594–6150 

E-mail: bkjones@usgs.gov 

U.S. Department of the Interior 

U.S. Geological Survey Printed on recycled paper Fact Sheet 2010–3053 July 2010
exv4w3







EXHIBIT 4.3




OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.

420 Third Avenue

Gallipolis, OH 45631

(740) 446-2631




November 2, 2009




Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549



RE: Ohio Valley Banc Corp. Registration Statement on Form S-3



Gentlemen:



Ohio Valley Banc Corp., an Ohio corporation (“Ohio Valley”), is today filing a Registration
Statement on Form S-3.



Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Ohio Valley hereby agrees to furnish the
Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements, defining the rights of holders of
its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being
filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement. Such long-term debt does not exceed 10% of the
total assets of Ohio Valley and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.




Very truly yours,




/s/ Jeffrey E. Smith




Jeffrey E. Smith

President and Chief Executive Officer

Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
#### 209.101 Definitions.

“Entity controlled by a foreign government,” “foreign government,” and “proscribed information,” are defined in the provision at 252.209-7002, Disclosure of Ownership or Control by a Foreign Government.

[59 FR 51132, Oct. 7, 1994]
#### 229.170-4 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.229-7011, Reporting of Foreign Taxes—U.S. Assistance Programs, in solicitations and contracts funded with U.S. assistance appropriations provided in the annual foreign operations appropriations act.

[70 FR 57192, Sept. 30, 2005]
EXHIBIT 18.3

LETTER RE:  CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE


Re:      Central and South West Corporation (CSW)
         West Texas Utilities Company (WTU)
         Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended March 31, 1997

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K
calling for a letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there
has been a change in accounting principle or practice.

         As stated in Note 1 in the Notes to Financial Statements of this Form
10-Q, effective January 1, 1997, WTU began utilizing the Last-In First-Out
(LIFO) method for valuation of its fossil fuel inventory. Prior to 
January 1, 1997, WTU utilized a LIFO method for coal and a weighted average
costs method for fossil fuel inventories other than coal. The change was made to
be consistent with its coal inventory valuation method. The change in accounting
did not affect results of operations due to the regulatory treatment of such
costs.

         A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for
determining the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable
alternative principles has not been established by the accounting profession.
Thus, we cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in
accounting described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method.
However, we have reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to
financial reporting, in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our
opinion stated below is based on our determination made in this manner.

         We are of the opinion that the Corporation's change in method of
accounting is to an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based
upon the reasons stated for the change and our discussions with management, is
also preferable under the circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at
this opinion, we have relied on the business judgment and business planning of
your management. We have not made an audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards of the financial statements of the three month period ended
March 31, 1997 or 1996 and, accordingly, we express no opinion thereon or on the
financial information filed as part of the Form 10-Q of which this letter is to
be an exhibit.


                                Very truly yours,



                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

Each year, funds are appropriated for Howard University and the Howard University Hospital.

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable viewShare this page |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Marshall T. BOX, also known as Little Mouse, Appellant.

No. 07-1406.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 2, 2007.

Filed: Nov. 8, 2007.

Thomas J. Kangior, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Appellee.

Marshall T. Box, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Michael L. Smart, Omaha, NE, for Appellant.

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Marshall Box appeals the 144-month sentence the district court1 imposed after granting the government’s post-judgment Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce Box’s sentence based on substantial assistance. Box’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Box’s cooperation, age, and other factors warranted a 50-60% sentence reduction rather than the lower reduction the district court applied. Counsel’s argument is unavailing. *See United States v. Haskins,*479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (court lacks jurisdiction to consider reasonableness of sentence following Rule 35(b) reduction; *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not expand 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) to include appellate review of discretionary sentencing reductions); *United States v. Coppedge,*135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir.1998) (per curiam) (challenge to extent of sentence reduction upon government’s Rule 35(b) motion was unreviewable because appeal was not based on any criteria listed in § 3742(a)).

Having reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. According*617ly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
#### In the Matter of Pablo Ramos, Appellant, v Edward R. Hammock, as Chairman of New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered July 27,1978 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking a rehearing of the setting of his minimum period of imprisonment. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur
#### Louis Schroeder *vs.*Frank Harris, impleaded, etc.

April 16, 1890.

Appeal from Justice — Dismissal instead of Affirmance — Harmless Error. — From a careful examination of the record in this action, it is manifest that the proceedings in justice’s court, which resulted in a judgment against this appellant, were regular and sufficient in every particular. *Held*that, even if the district court erred in dismissing an appeal upon questions of law alone, instead of affirming said judgment, (on which no opinion is expressed,) the error was without prejudice.

Appeal by defendant Harris from an order of the district court for Becker county, *Mills,*J., presiding, dismissing his appeal (on questions of law only) from a judgment of $34.46 against him in justice’s court, on the ground that it was described in the notice of appeal as a judgment of $2.50.

*W. W. Rossman*and *Jeff H. Irish,*for appellant.

*C. M. Johnston*and *Walter J. Trash,*for respondent.

Collins, J.

Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing an appeal, upon questions of law alone, from a judgment rendered in justice’s court. We have carefully examined the very full and complete record of the proceedings in the trial court, and it is manifest that no error can be found therein. If, therefore, the district court committed a mistake in dismissing the appeal, as to which we express no opinion, it was without prejudice to the appellant. Instead of having the justice’s judgment affirmed, as it should have been on the record, there was simply a dismissal of the appeal. Of this result the appellant ought not to complain.

Order affirmed.
Chart 26194HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       26194          Edition:       5          Edition Date:       July 2004          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/17/2010     LNM -       7/6/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagle’s, Inc. for the period ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagle’s, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  -  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  
Date: November 12, 2004 By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle  
J. Douglas Cagle  Chief Executive Officer  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagle’s, Inc. for the period ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagle’s, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  -  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  
Date: November 12, 2004 By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV  Mark M. Ham IV  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         119,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,855
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,980
<PP&E>                                         111,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                (90,615)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          869,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,111
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,843,538)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,992
<SALES>                                         48,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,014
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (656,819)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (46,530)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (654,837)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (654,837)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (654,837)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

141928

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141928 COA: 299176 Jackson CC: 10-005218-FH CAMILLE TRUMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould now be reviewed by this Court.
NO. 07-03-0230-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 25, 2003

______________________________

JOHN WELCH AND ANGELA WELCH, APPELLANT

V.

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 284TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY;

NO. 02-03-01831-CV; HONORABLE OLEN UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 9, 2003, a copy of a Notice of Appeal from a Summary Judgment in Cause

No. 02-03-01831-CV in the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, was filed

with the clerk of the Ninth Court of Appeals. The Summary Judgment was signed on April

9, 2003. 
2

On June 17, 2003, the trial court clerk’s record was filed with the clerk of this court.

There has not been a reporter’s record filed. 

By letter dated November 4, 2003, appellant was advised that appellant’s brief had

not been filed and that unless a motion for extension of time to file the brief was received

within ten days, the appeal would be subject to dismissal. No response has been received

to the letter of November 4, 2003. Neither appellant’s brief nor a motion to extend time for

filing the brief have been filed. 

This appeal is dismissed. TEX. R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1). Costs are taxed to appellant.

TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.

Phil Johnson

Chief Justice
#### 304.1300 Policy.

To ensure compliance with Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12: Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors (HSPD-12) and the Presidential Cross Agency Priority for strong authentication, contracting officers shall provide in each acquisition those HSPD-12 requirements necessary for contract performance.