alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016453EN.01000102.xml

| 3.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8225 — GeoPost/Corfin 14/BRT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 453/02)

On 24 November 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8225. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8225. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
DOCUMENT AND OTHER EVIDENCE LOG

Facility or Case I Dates Started 

Name: Survey or

Name of person I Investigation

collecting items listed: Conducted

Date

Collected

Item Collected

(Name &IOr Brief Description of

Document or Item)

Number Of

Pages Or

Items

Obtained From Notes

L I..
Date Item Collected Number Of Obtained From Notes Collected (Name&/Or Brief Description of Pages Or

Document or Item) Items
333.102 General. ( g ) ( 1 ) The Office of General Counsel-General Law Division serves as the liaison for protests lodged with the Government Accountability Office (GAO); is designated as the office responsible for all protests within the Department of Health and Human Services; and serves as the notification point with GAO for all protests.
( 2 ) The contracting officer will follow the direction of the Operating Division's protest control officer for responding to protests whether they are filed with GAO or directly with the contracting officer.
#### 36.510 Operations and storage areas.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.236-10, Operations ald Storage Areas, in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract or a fixed-price dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction or a fixed-price contract for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.

[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34759, July 3, 1995]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Key Staff

Dr. Bernadette Hence, (202) 453-7913, bernadette.hence@ed.gov

**Mailing Address:**U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Postsecondary Education, Institutional ServiceMinority Science and Engineering Improvement Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., 4th FloorWashington, DC 20202
OPE.MSEIP@ed.gov
Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
# C_2018008EN.01000401.xml

| 11.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 January 2018

(2018/C 8/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1992 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4469 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8110 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1725 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6448 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,570 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,92 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1814 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6395 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5548 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5289 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4931 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3809 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6654 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5981 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 280,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9214 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7996 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4493 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 105,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8004 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,624 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,3985 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,506 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8952 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1300 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,2630 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1992

JPY

Japanese yen

133,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4469

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88670

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8110

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1725

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6448

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,570

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,92

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1814

RON

Romanian leu

4,6395

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5548

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5289

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4931

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3809

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6654

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5981

KRW

South Korean won

1 280,95

ZAR

South African rand

14,9214

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7996

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4493

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 105,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8004

PHP

Philippine peso

60,624

RUB

Russian rouble

68,3985

THB

Thai baht

38,506

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8952

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1300

INR

Indian rupee

76,2630

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2017247EN.01000201.xml

| 29.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 July 2017

(2017/C 247/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1729 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4364 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89568 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5355 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1357 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3195 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,048 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2493 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5580 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1462 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4732 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4712 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1613 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5694 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5947 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 317,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2811 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9087 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4120 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 639,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0229 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,207 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,8319 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,146 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7015 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8089 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,2555 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1729

JPY

Japanese yen

130,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4364

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89568

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5355

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1357

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3195

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,048

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2493

RON

Romanian leu

4,5580

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1462

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4732

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4712

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1613

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5694

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5947

KRW

South Korean won

1 317,62

ZAR

South African rand

15,2811

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9087

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4120

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 639,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0229

PHP

Philippine peso

59,207

RUB

Russian rouble

69,8319

THB

Thai baht

39,146

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7015

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8089

INR

Indian rupee

75,2555

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2019352EN.01001401.xml

| 18.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/14

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2019/C 352/14)

Image 1

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Latvia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Latvia

Subject of commemoration: The rising sun

Description of the design: The coin is dedicated to the history of the Coat of arms of Latvia and features the motif of a rising sun. This motif was originally part of the design proposal for the symbol of the autonomous Latvia, created by artist Ansis Cīrulis in 1917. Later on this motif emerged as one of the basic elements of the Coat of arms of Latvia.

The motif of a rising sun has also been used by artist Ansis Cīrulis before, in the design of the Latvian riflemen’s badge and his other artworks. After the foundation of the Republic of Latvia in 1918 variations of the motif of a rising sun appeared in all design proposals for the Coat of arms of the new State. The Coat of arms of Latvia was officially adopted in 1921.

The design shows the motif of the rising sun, with stylised letters B and L (an abbreviation from the words ‘Brīvā Latvija’ (Free Latvia)) in the centre. It also bears an inscription ‘UZLECOŠĀ SAULE’ (The rising sun), the name of the issuing country ‘LATVIJA’ and the year of issuance ‘2019’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 307 000

Date of issue: Third quarter of 2019

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

---
#### 22.1008 Procedures for obtaining wage determinations.

[71 FR 36933, June 28, 2006]
315.606 Agency procedures. ( a ) The HCA is responsible for establishing procedures to comply with FAR 15.606(a).
( b ) The HCA or designee shall be the point of contact for coordinating the receipt and processing of unsolicited proposals.
2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE 84.327S

Absolute Priority: 

Organization: 

Project Title: 

Start Date: 

End Date: 

Project Director: 

Full Name: 

Address Line 1: 

Address Line 2: 

City: 

State: 

Zip Code: 

Telephone: 

Email: 

Average Time on

Project, Year 1 (%)*: 

*Example: enter .2532 for 25.32%.

Additional Key Personnel (not including project director/s listed above): 

Full Name / Degree Program 

Position / Average 

Time on Project, 

Year 1 (%)* 

*Example: enter .2532 for 25.32%.

Email 
 

 

2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE: 84.327S PAGE 2 

Briefly describe the purpose and expected outcomes. (100 words or fewer) 

Briefly describe how the project will be designed, managed, and evaluated to 

address the identified outcomes. (100 words or fewer) 
Disability (or disabilities) focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

 

 

 

2024 ABSTRACT TEMPLATE: 84.327S PAGE 3 

Autism 

Deaf-blindness 

Deafness 

Developmental delay (DD) 

Emotional disturbance (ED) 

Hearing impairment 

Intellectual disability 

Multiple disabilities 

Orthopedic impairment 

Other health impairment 

Specific learning disability 

Speech or language impairment 

Traumatic brain injury 

Visual impairment 

Age group(s) of students with disabilities focused on by the project 

(check all that apply): 

Birth to 3 

Preschool 

Elementary School 

Middle School 

High School 

Postsecondary 

Target content area(s) focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

Assessment 

Behavior 

Early Childhood 

Inclusive Practices 

Instructional Strategies 

Literacy 

STEM 

MTSS 

Data Collection, Analysis and Use (373) 

ELs with Disabilities 

Accessible Educational Materials 

Technology Research and Development 

Assistive and Instructional Technology 

Transition Services 

Dropout Prevention 

Family Engagement 

Related Services 

Dispute Resolution 

Geography focused on by the project (check all that apply): 

Urban Suburban Rural
AMENDMENT TO FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND 

FINAL JUDGMENT 

In its Order dated February 27, 2020 (Dkt. No. 744), the Court found with respect to the 

two proposed amendments to Class Action Settlement as follows: 

A lower threshold dollar amount for distributions of remaining settlement 

funds benefits all class members, since it would provide more class 

members with a second round of payments. The proposed fees to 

objectors’ counsel would not impact class members at all, as Class 

Counsel’s payment would come out of their own fee award and 

Defendants’ payment from funds outside the settlement amount. Neither 

change to the settlement impacts the class members’ bargained-for rights. 

Thus, if the case is remanded, the Court will not require a new round of 

class notice or conduct another fairness hearing prior to issuing a ruling 

approving the amended settlement. 

The Court finds that the proposed amendments do not impact its 

prior reasoning approving the settlement as fair. Additionally, a speedier 

settlement and payout is in all class members’ interests. 

The Court finds that its reasoning remains true following remand from the Seventh Circuit, 

and in light of the Settlement Agreement between Class Counsel, the Cruise Line Defendants, and 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

PHILIP CHARVAT, on behalf of himself ) 

and others similarly situated, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) No. 12-cv-05746 

 v. ) 

 ) Judge Andrea R. Wood 

ELIZABETH VALENTE, RESORT ) 

MARKETING GROUP, INC., CARNIVAL ) 

CORPORATION & PLC, ROYAL ) 

CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., and NCL ) 

(BAHAMAS) LTD., ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 752 Filed: 04/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:24407
2 

Objectors (Dkt. No. 739-2) (“Objector Agreement”), incorporated herein, the Court’s findings 

above and in the February 27, 2020 Order, and upon remand from the Seventh Circuit on March 

20, 2020, the Final Order of Dismissal and Final Judgment (Dkt. No. 730) (“Final Judgment”) is 

amended to reflect that: (1) the threshold administrative feasibility amount addressed in Section 

8.4 of the Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”) (Dkt. Nos. 569-1, 574-

1), and in Paragraph 13(e) of the Final Judgment, is decreased from $5.00 to $2.50; and (2) Class 

Counsel and the Cruise Line Defendants are authorized to pay Objectors in accordance with the 

Objector Agreement. 

Accordingly, with no just reason for delay, and pursuant to the Agreement and Objector 

Agreement, judgment is herewith entered. Civil case terminated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 2, 2020 

 _________________________________ 

ANDREA R. WOOD 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 752 Filed: 04/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:24408
#### YAOHUA DENG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK EDUCATIONAL GROUP, INC., Chartwells Company, Dennis LeStrange, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-1733-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 2, 2007.

Yaohua Deng, Stony Brook, NY, pro se.

Steven M. Stimell, Bryan Cave LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee, Aramark Educational Group, Inc.

Andrew P. Marks, Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees, Chartwells Company and Dennis Lestrange.

PRESENT: Hon. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, Hon. B.D. PARKER and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Yaohua Deng, *pro se,*appeals from a March 24, 2006 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Hurley, J.), 2006 WL 752826, dismissing appellant’s complaint as barred by the doctrines of *res judicata*and collateral estoppel. We presume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case, and the arguments on appeal.

Having reviewed the record *de novo,*we affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. Further, contrary to appellant’s contentions, the district court previously denied his claims regarding unlawful discharge and the seniority system on the merits and, thus, those claims were barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Therefore, we hold that appellant’s claims were properly dismissed.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
166 So. 140

#### Succession of WINKLER.

No. 33714.

Feb. 3, 1936.

Rehearing Denied March 2, 1936.

John C. O’Connor and Arthur Landry, both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Harold J. Moore, of New Orleans, for appellee Mary Frances Ohlenforst Winkler.

Daniel Wendling, of New Orleans, for appellee Victory Oil Co.

BRUNOT, Justice.

Peter Gabriel Winkler died intestate. Pie was married twice. Four children, all the issue of his first marriage, survive him. He left an estate, consisting of paraphernal personal property, and a surviving widow. An administration of the estate was provoked, and, by agreement of the interested parties, Leopold C. Winkler was appointed and qualified as administrator of the succession.

In due course the assets of the succession were assembled, the debts tabulated, and the administrator’s final account was filed. ■ Several alleged creditors of the deceased, and his surviving widow, who alleged herself to be the widow of the deceased, in necessitous circumstances, and, as such, entitled, as a privileged creditor of the estate, to the sum of $1,000, filed oppositions to the account. The oppositions *465were heard, some of them were rejected, and the account was amended by affirming others, including the opposition of the widow of the deceased.

No appeal from the judgment was taken by any of the parties opposing the account, but the administrator appealed from that part of the judgment decreeing the widow of the deceased to be in necessitous circumstances and entitled, as a privileged creditor, to $1,000, and ordering the account amended accordingly.

The testimony of the widow is positive that she was left in dire necessity by the death of her husband. To offset this testimony, the appellant offered certain probate records from the clerk of court of the parish of Acadia, in which parish the succession of Mrs. Winkler’s first husband was opened.

These records show that, in the settlement of the affairs of that succession, Mrs. Winkler, who was at that time the widow of the deceased, Wenzel Ohlenforst, received from his succession a few hundred dollars. The record shows that this small sum was used after the death of her first husband for the purpose of educating her son, the issue of her first marriage, and that it was wholly expended several years before the death of her second husband, Peter Gabriel Winkler.

It would serve no useful purpose to review the facts further.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, the costs of the appeal to be paid by the succession.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 29 

Recognizing January 28, 2017, as ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. DAINES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing January 28, 2017, as ‘‘National Data Privacy 

Day’’. 

Whereas, on January 28, 2017, National Data Privacy Day 

is recognized; 

Whereas technology has enhanced our ability to communicate, 

learn, and work and is now a part of our everyday lives; 

Whereas personal information has become a form of currency; 

Whereas it is easier now than ever before to share personal 

information with friends, colleagues, and companies; 

Whereas the sharing of personal information may compromise 

the privacy of individuals if appropriate protective action 

is not taken; 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 29 IS 

Whereas governments, corporations, and individuals have a 

role in protecting the privacy of individuals; and 

Whereas National Data Privacy Day constitutes a nationwide 

effort to educate and raise awareness about respecting 

privacy and safeguarding data: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes January 28, 2017, as ‘‘National 

3 Data Privacy Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages governments, individuals, pri5 vacy professionals, educators, corporations, and 

6 other relevant organizations to take steps to protect 

7 the privacy of individuals. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS