alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 379 

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee 

on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2018 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent 

Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

Whereas, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs conducted an investigation into the purchase and 

shipment of illicit opioids into and throughout the United 

States; 

Whereas, the Subcommittee has received a request from a 

federal law enforcement agency for access to records of 

the Subcommittee’s investigation; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the SenVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:44 Jan 23, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR379.ATS SR379

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 379 ATS 

ate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority 

2 Member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investiga3 tions of the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern4 mental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to provide 

5 to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and 

6 other entities or individuals duly authorized by federal or 

7 state governments, records of the Subcommittee’s inves8 tigation into the purchase and shipment of illicit opioids 

9 into and throughout the United States. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Angelica Marty et al., as Administrators of the Estates of Delia Lopez and Others, Deceased, and as General Guardian of Huberto Lopez, Jr., an Infant, Appellants, v. Edward E. Falk, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Nuchem Falk et al., Defendants, and Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and for -personal injuries arising out of negligence with respect to a gas heater, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 18, 1961 after a jury trial, as, at the end of plaintiffs’ case, dismissed the complaint as against the defendant Gas Company, by reason of plaintiffs’ failure to prove the allegations in their *728complaint as amplified by their bill o£ particulars. As to the other defendants named, the action has been either discontinued or settled. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts; new trial granted as between plaintiffs and the defendant Gas Company, with costs to plaintiffs to abide the event; and action severed as against the other named defendants. In our opinion, under the unusual circumstances contained in this record, the plaintiffs, in the interests of justice, should be afforded a new trial and the opportunity to present the evidence, which the record shows to be available, in support of proper pleadings. Plaintiffs, if so advised, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, may serve an amended complaint and amended bill of particulars alleging the Gas Company’s specific acts of negligence which they (plaintiffs) will assert upon the new trial. Ugbetta, Acting P. J., Klainfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
# Fo urth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 21, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00676

- CV

Jose GEORGE , Matilde George, and Elaine George

,

Appellants

v.

COMPASS BANK

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 037 73

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Appellants' unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to October 14, 2016.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunt o set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of Septemb er, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2018053EN.01000201.xml

| 13.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 February 2018

(2018/C 53/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2263 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4458 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88600 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9195 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1503 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 125,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,358 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,97 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1748 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6524 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6648 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5645 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5427 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5892 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6918 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6256 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 328,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6721 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7604 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4525 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 722,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8368 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,730 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,0851 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,874 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0415 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,8364 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,8940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2263

JPY

Japanese yen

133,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4458

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88600

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9195

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1503

ISK

Iceland króna

125,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,358

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,97

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1748

RON

Romanian leu

4,6524

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6648

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5645

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5427

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5892

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6918

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6256

KRW

South Korean won

1 328,30

ZAR

South African rand

14,6721

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7604

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4525

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 722,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8368

PHP

Philippine peso

63,730

RUB

Russian rouble

71,0851

THB

Thai baht

38,874

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0415

MXN

Mexican peso

22,8364

INR

Indian rupee

78,8940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### The People of the State of New York v. George B. McNeil.

Enlargement of time granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
#### 2846.601 General.

Bureaus shall prescribe procedures and instructions for the use, preparation, and distribution of material inspection and receiving reports and commercial shipping document/packing lists to evidence Government inspection (FAR 46.401) and acceptance (FAR 46.501).
# C_2018165EN.01000401.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 May 2018

(2018/C 165/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1878 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4496 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87810 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3150 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1908 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5470 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,498 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2443 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6388 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,0429 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5865 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5172 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3241 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7144 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5925 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 270,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,7041 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5419 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3885 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 664,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7700 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,768 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,7070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,081 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2464 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0556 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,8905 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1878

JPY

Japanese yen

130,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4496

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87810

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3150

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1908

ISK

Iceland króna

122,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5470

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,498

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2443

RON

Romanian leu

4,6388

TRY

Turkish lira

5,0429

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5865

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5172

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3241

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7144

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5925

KRW

South Korean won

1 270,74

ZAR

South African rand

14,7041

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5419

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3885

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 664,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7700

PHP

Philippine peso

61,768

RUB

Russian rouble

73,7070

THB

Thai baht

38,081

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2464

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0556

INR

Indian rupee

79,8905

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 2 of 23 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 3 of 23 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 4 of 23 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 5 of 23 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 6 of 23 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 7 of 23 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 8 of 23 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 9 of 23 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 10 of 23 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 11 of 23 PageID #:11
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 12 of 23 PageID #:12
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 13 of 23 PageID #:13
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 14 of 23 PageID #:14
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 15 of 23 PageID #:15
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 16 of 23 PageID #:16
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 17 of 23 PageID #:17
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 18 of 23 PageID #:18
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 19 of 23 PageID #:19
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 20 of 23 PageID #:20
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 21 of 23 PageID #:21
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 22 of 23 PageID #:22
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 23 of 23 PageID #:23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains Summary Financial Information extracted from the
Quarterly Report for the 6 months ended June 30, 1999 of Carrols Corporation and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         737,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  204,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,646,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,968,000
<PP&E>                                     191,356,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (86,166,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             305,101,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,787,000
<BONDS>                                    242,476,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,344,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               305,101,000
<SALES>                                    115,745,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           115,962,000
<CGS>                                       35,651,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              187,756,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,291,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                918,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   632,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            286,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                940,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (654,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 166 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 166

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, 
 Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2024

    Mr. Walberg (for himself, Mr. Barr, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. 
 Moolenaar, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, 
 Mr. Ogles, Mrs. McClain, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Burlison, Mr. 
  Grothman, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Williams of Texas, Mr. Moore of Utah, Mrs. 
Hinson, Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Bean of Florida, Mr. Owens, Mr. Estes, Mr. 
 Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Smucker, Mr. Baird, Mr. Weber of Texas, 
 Ms. Tenney, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. Mann, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. 
 Allen, Ms. Letlow, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mr. 
 Bilirakis, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Pence, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. Fleischmann, and 
Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia) submitted the following joint resolution; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, 
 Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Defining and 
Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, 
Outside Sales, and Computer Employees'' (89 Fed. Reg. 32842 (April 26, 
2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### 253.215-70 DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines Application.

Follow the procedures at PGI 253.215-70 for completing DD Form 1547.

[71 FR 69495, Dec. 1, 2006]
124 STAT. 1266 PUBLIC LAW 111–181—JUNE 9, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3892: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Jan. 13, considered and passed House. 

May 25, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–181 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 101 West 

Highway 64 Bypass in Roper, North Carolina, as the ‘‘E.V. Wilkins Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. E.V. WILKINS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 101 West Highway 64 Bypass in Roper, North 

Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘E.V. Wilkins 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘E.V. Wilkins Post Office’’. 

Approved June 9, 2010. 

June 9, 2010 

[H.R. 3892] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
32.000 Scope of part. This part prescribes policies and procedures for contract financing and other payment matters. This part addresses— ( a ) Payment methods, including partial payments and progress payments based on percentage or stage of completion;
( b ) Loan guarantees, advance payments, and progress payments based on costs;
( c ) Administration of debts to the Government arising out of contracts;
( d ) Contract funding, including the use of contract clauses limiting costs or funds;
( e ) Assignment of claims to aid in private financing;
( f ) Selected payment clauses;
( g ) Financing of purchases of commercial products and commercial services;
( h ) Performance-based payments; and
( i ) Electronic funds transfer payments.
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 49710, Sept. 26, 1995; 61 FR 45772, Aug. 29, 1996; 67 FR 13054, Mar. 20, 2002; 86 FR 61029, Nov. 4, 2021]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Amendment No. 2 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Flow International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), for the year ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Douglas P. Fletcher, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P.
FLETCHER                                    
|Douglas P. Fletcher Principal Financial Officer March 29, 2007
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------



                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)



     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Chattem, Inc., a Tennessee corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2005
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:    April 1, 2005              /s/ Zan Guerry
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Zan Guerry,
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




Dated:    April 1, 2005              /s/ Richard D. Moss
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Richard D. Moss
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q, or as a separate disclosure document.

     A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS
BEEN PROVIDED TO CHATTEM, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CHATTEM, INC. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments.

As prescribed in 232.7102, use the following clause:

# Levies on Contract Payments (DEC 2006)

(a) 26 U.S.C. 6331(h) authorizes the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to continuously levy up to 100 percent of contract payments, up to the amount of tax debt.

(b) When a levy is imposed on a payment under this contract and the Contractor believes that the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract, the Contractor shall promptly notify the Procuring Contracting Officer in writing, with a copy to the Administrative Contracting Officer, and shall provide—

(1) The total dollar amount of the levy;

(2) A statement that the Contractor believes that the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract, including rationale and adequate supporting documentation; and

(3) Advice as to whether the inability to perform may adversely affect national security, including rationale and adequate supporting documentation.

(c) DoD shall promptly review the Contractor's assessment, and the Procuring Contracting Officer shall provide a written notification to the Contractor including—

(1) A statement as to whether DoD agrees that the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract; and

(2)(i) If the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract and the lack of performance will adversely affect national security, the total amount of the monies collected that should be returned to the Contractor; or

(ii) If the levy may result in an inability to perform the contract but will not impact national security, a recommendation that the Contractor promptly notify the IRS to attempt to resolve the tax situation.

(d) Any DoD determination under this clause is not subject to appeal under the Contract Disputes Act.

(End of clause)

[70 FR 52032, Sept. 1, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 69492, Dec. 1, 2006]