alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

VANDER COLTRANE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 12 C 4955

)

MIDWEST COAST LOGISTICS, INC. )

and ABDI J. FARAH, Individually, )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Vander Coltrane ("Coltrane") has sued Midwest Coast Logistics, Inc. ("Midwest") and

Abdi Farah ("Farah"), invoking diversity jurisdiction over a dispute stemming from a vehicular

collision on an interstate highway in Missouri (although Complaint ¶4 identifies Coltrane as a

resident of Columbia, Missouri, this Court assumes that he is a Missouri citizen as well). It is 1

clear that this action has nothing to do with Illinois except for Chicago being the asserted

principal place of Midwest's business (Complaint ¶3). Indeed, no basis at all appears for

exercising personal jurisdiction over Farah, who is identified as an Ohio citizen in Complaint ¶2.

What is exceedingly plain is that even if (as may well be the case) the requisite diversity

of citizenship exists, 28 U.S.C. §1391(b) makes this judicial district an improper venue for this

 Despite the mandate of Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 8(a)(1), the Complaint is silent as to 1

the grounds for federal subject matter jurisdiction. For purposes of this memorandum order, this

Court has indulged the charitable assumption that the case sounds in diversity. Even that premise

may be overly charitable, however, for as if to underscore the seeming unfamiliarity of Coltrane's

counsel (a law firm officing in Corpus Christi, Texas) with federal practice, the ad damnum

seeks "an amount in excess of $50,000 plus costs of suit," although the required amount in

controversy for diversity jurisdiction is of course $75,000-plus.

Case: 1:12-cv-04955 Document #: 3 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:7
lawsuit. Coltrane's attorneys are given until July 13, 2012 to file a statement justifying the filing

of this action here, failing which this Court will dismiss both the Complaint and this action

(without prejudice, of course, to suit being filed in an appropriate situs elsewhere).

_________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: June 26, 2012.

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-04955 Document #: 3 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:8
#### 2833.211 Contracting officer's decision.

The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) hears and decides contract disputes originating from DOJ.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-11627, No. 33-17359, No. 33-20706, No. 33-29636, No. 333-03001, No.
33-48663, No. 333-61708 and No. 333-103132 all on Form S-8, and No. 333-10311
on Form S-3 of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc. of our report dated January 9,
2004 (which contains an explanatory paragraph regarding a change in the
method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets in 2002) appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc. for the
year ended October 26, 2003.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 9, 2004
#### 2124.104-70 Contract clause.

The clause at 2152.224-70 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.
On March 23, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register a **Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)**. Through this NPRM, the Secretary proposes to amend current regulations, and establish new regulations, for the High School Equivalency Program and College Assistance Migrant Program (HEP and CAMP); the Federal TRIO programs (TRIO Programs--Training Program for Federal TRIO Programs (Training), Talent Search (TS), Educational Opportunity Centers (EOC), Upward Bound (UB), Student Support Services (SSS), and the Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement (McNair) Programs; and the Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Program (GEAR UP) program.

List of negotiators for the Discretionary Grants Team:  MS Word (39K) | PDF (23K)

## Schedule

**Session One**

- February 18-20, 2009

- Organizational Protocols:    MS Word  (38K) |  PDF  (23K)
- Agenda:    MS Word  (31K) |  PDF  (20K)
- Issue Papers - TRIO:    MS Word  (45K) |  PDF  (36K)
- Issue Papers - GEAR UP:    MS Word  (42K) |  PDF  (43K)
- Issue Papers - Migrant Education:    MS Word  (33K) |  PDF  (17K)

**Session Two**

- March 25-March 27, 2009

- Issue Papers - TRIO:    MS Word  (78K) |  PDF  (395K)
- Issue Papers - GEAR UP:    MS Word  (51K) |  PDF  (33K)
- Issue Papers - Migrant Education:    MS Word  (36K) |  PDF  (22K)

**Session Three**

- April 28-April 30, 2009

- Issue Papers - TRIO:    MS Word  (303K) |  PDF  (796K)
- Issue Papers - GEAR UP:    MS Word  (116K) |  PDF  (500K)
- Issue Papers - Migrant Education:    MS Word  (64K) |  PDF  (269K)

All meetings were held at the Department of Education, 8th Floor Conference Center, 1990 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.

On December 31, 2008, the Department published a notice in the Federal Register announcing its intent to establish five negotiated rulemaking committees for higher education.  This notice summarizes the issues each team will address.  See **Notice Of Establishment of Negotiated Rulemaking Committees**.

Spring 2009 Negotiated Rulemaking | HEOA Page | OPE Policy Page
# C_2017338EN.01000101.xml

| 9.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 338/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 330, 2.10.2017

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 318, 25.9.2017

OJ C 309, 18.9.2017

OJ C 300, 11.9.2017

OJ C 293, 4.9.2017

OJ C 283, 28.8.2017

OJ C 277, 21.8.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
##### 



Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Certron
Corporation (the Company) for the period ended July 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I,
Marshall I. Kass, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





| |                      |  |                                                                                           
| | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Marshall I. Kass
| |                     
| | Name:
Title:         |  | Marshall I. Kass
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:                |  | August 27, 2002                                                                           



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

JEFFREY SATTERFIELD, Individually and On 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LIME ENERGY CO., JOHN O’ROURKE, and 

JEFFREY MISTARZ, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. 1:12-cv-05704 

CLASS ACTION 

Judge Sara L. Ellis 

LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 

Lead Plaintiffs Jamie Fang and Kevin J. Fetzer (“Plaintiffs”) hereby move for a brief 

extension of time to file their motion for Preliminary Approval of the Proposed Settlement 

Agreement, Notice to the Settlement Class and Conditional Settlement Class Certification. 

Defendants Lime Energy Company, John O’Rourke, and Jeffrey Mistarz, (collectively, 

“Defendants”) agree to the relief sought in this motion. In support of their motion, Plaintiffs state 

as follows: 

1. This is a putative class action on behalf of purchasers of Lime Energy Company 

securities seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

2. At the status hearing held on November 11, 2013, counsel for Plaintiffs and 

Defendants reported to the Court that they had reached a tentative settlement in the abovecaptioned matter. Subsequently, the Court ordered that the parties file preliminary approval 

documents on or before January 14, 2014, and scheduled a preliminary approval hearing for 

January 28, 2014. (See Dkt. No. 81). 

Case: 1:12-cv-05704 Document #: 85 Filed: 01/09/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:773
 2 

3. The parties request that the deadline for the filing of preliminary approval 

documents be extended for one (1) week, or to January 21, 2014. 

4. The parties suggest that the preliminary approval hearing date remain set for 

January 28, 2014, as the parties are prepared to move for preliminary approval on that date. 

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the time for the 

parties to file their preliminary approval documents from January 14, 2014 to January 21, 2014. 

January 9, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 

POMERANTZ LLP 

/s/ Louis C. Ludwig

Patrick V. Dahlstrom 

Leigh Handelman Smollar 

Louis C. Ludwig 

Ten South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Tel: (312) 377-1181 

Fax: (312) 377-1184 

 Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the 

 Proposed Class 

Case: 1:12-cv-05704 Document #: 85 Filed: 01/09/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:774
32.608-2 Interest credits. ( a ) An equitable interest credit shall be applied under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) When the amount of debt initially determined is subsequently reduced; *e.g.*, through a successful appeal.
( 2 ) When any amount collected by the Government is in excess of the amount found to be due on appeal under the Disputes Clause of the contract.
( 3 ) When the collection procedures followed in a given case result in an overcollection of the debt due.
( 4 ) When the responsible official determines that the Government has unduly delayed payments to the contractor on the same contract at some time during the period to which the interest charge applied, provided an interest penalty was not paid for such late payment.
( b ) Any appropriate interest credits shall be computed under the following procedures: ( 1 ) Interest at the rate under 52.232-17 shall be charged on the reduced debt from the date of collection by the Government until the date the monies are remitted to the contractor.
( 2 ) Interest may not be reduced for any time between the due date under the demand and the period covered by a deferment of collection, unless the contract includes an interest clause; *e.g.*, the clause prescribed in 32.611.
( 3 ) Interest shall not be credited in an amount that, when added to other amounts refunded or released to the contractor, exceeds the total amount that has been collected, or withheld for the purpose of collecting the debt. This limitation shall be further reduced by the amount of any limitation applicable under paragraph (b)(2) of this subsection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                 1,977,026
<RECEIVABLES>                                  498,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000
<INVENTORY>                                    255,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,046,625
<PP&E>                                         224,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,156,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,063,230
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,174,043
<COMMON>                                           252
<OTHER-SE>                                     918,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,156,351
<SALES>                                      1,501,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,501,406
<CGS>                                          883,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,213,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,215,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,126,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,126,093)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,126,093)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.18)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2



          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
              Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



         I, Eric M. Specter, the Chief Financial Officer of Charming Shoppes,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended November 2, 2002
(the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:   December 13, 2002

                                                     /S/ ERIC M. SPECTER
                                                     Eric M. Specter
                                                     Executive Vice President
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan Vituli                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|November 10, 2004
#### 31.201-5 Credits.

The applicable portion of any income, rebate, allowance, or other credit relating to any allowable cost and received by or accruing to the contractor shall be credited to the Government either as a cost reduction or by cash refund. See 31.205-6(j)(3) for rules governing refund or credit to the Government associated with pension adjustments and asset reversions.

[48 FR 42301, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 34755, Aug. 21, 1989; 63 FR 58597, Oct. 30, 1998; 72 FR 46363, Aug. 17, 2007]
#### 229.204 Federal excise tax on specific foreign contract payments.

The contracting officer shall not authorize the Governmentwide commercial purchase card as a method of payment during any contract period of performance if the contract includes the clause at FAR 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, unless the contract also includes the clause at 252.229-7014, Full Exemption from Two-Percent Excise Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements, indicating that the contractor is fully exempt from the tax.
#### 34.005-4 Demonstration contracts.

Whenever practicable, contracts for the demonstration phase should provide for contractors to submit, by the end of the phase, priced proposals, totally funded by the Government, for full-scale development. The contracting officer should provide contractors with operational test conditions, performance criteria, life cycle cost factors, and any other selection criteria necessary for the contractors to prepare their proposals.
214.201-6 Solicitation provisions. ( 2 ) Use the provisions at 252.215-7007, Notice of Intent to Resolicit, and 252.215-7008, Only One Offer, as prescribed at 215.371-6 and 215.408(3), respectively.
[77 FR 39138, June 29, 2012, as amended at 83 FR 30825, June 29, 2018]
#### 2403.502-70 Subcontractor kickbacks.

Contracting Officers shall report suspected violations of the Anti-Kickback Act through the Head of the Contracting Activity to the Office of the Inspector General consistent with the procedures for reporting any violation of law contained in the current HUD Handbook 2000.3, Office of Inspector General Activities.

[64 FR 46095, Aug. 23, 1999]
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Anahita Villafane,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-KSB of Aspyra, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the smallbusiness issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors:

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 31, 2006 | /S/ Anahita Villafane   |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | Anahita Villafane       |   |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
# C_2016372EN.01000301.xml

| 11.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8123 — Total/Lampiris)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 372/05)

On 7 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8123. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8123. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 332.706 Solicitation provision and contract clauses.