1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DANIEL DVORKIN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 12 CR 500

Chicago, Illinois

August 26, 2013

8:45 o'clock a.m.

JURY TRIAL - VOLUME 1-A

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE HONORABLE EDMOND E. CHANG

APPEARANCES:

For the Plaintiff: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

MS. HEATHER K. McSHAIN

MR. JEFFREY D. PERCONTE

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

312-353-5300

For the Defendant: FRANKEL & COHEN

MR. SCOTT J. FRANKEL

53 West Jackson Boulevard

Chicago, Illinois 60604

312-759-9600

CHICO & NUNES

MR. MARK W. WALLIN

333 West Wacker Drive

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312-463-1000

Court Reporter: FEDERAL OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER

MS. KRISTA BURGESON

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

312-435-5567

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 1 of 130 PageID #:2529
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2

I N D E X

PAGE

MOTIONS IN LIMINE 6

VOIR DIRE 35

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 2 of 130 PageID #:2530
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

08:48:59

08:59:07

08:59:08

08:59:12

08:59:12

08:59:14

08:59:14

08:59:17

08:59:18

08:59:19

08:59:22

08:59:25

08:59:27

08:59:27

08:59:28

08:59:31

08:59:33

08:59:33

08:59:34

08:59:36

08:59:41

08:59:41

08:59:42

08:59:45

08:59:48

3

THE CLERK: All rise.

Court is in session.

THE COURT: 12 CR 500, United States versus Daniel

Dvorkin.

Appearances for the record, please?

MS. MCSHAIN: Good morning, your Honor.

Heather McShain and Jeff Perconte on behalf of the

United States.

MR. PERCONTE: Good morning.

MR. WALLIN: Good morning, your Honor.

Mark Wallin and Scott Frankel on behalf of the

defendant, Daniel Dvorkin.

MR. FRANKEL: Good morning, Judge.

THE COURT: Good morning.

Please make an effort to be here at 8:45.

MR. FRANKEL: We were making an effort. I am sorry,

Judge.

MOTIONS IN LIMINE

THE COURT: So first, if I can get a list of the

witnesses that I can read to the jury so they can see if they

know them.

MR. FRANKEL: Yes.

THE COURT: And you can do it verbally if you know it

off the top of your head.

MR. PERCONTE: For the government, Judge, it is going

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 3 of 130 PageID #:2531
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

08:59:50

09:00:07

09:00:21

09:00:30

09:00:43

09:00:47

09:00:49

09:00:53

09:00:57

09:00:57

09:01:02

09:01:04

09:01:07

09:01:09

09:01:09

09:01:10

09:01:12

09:01:14

09:01:17

09:01:20

09:01:27

09:01:30

09:01:31

09:01:32

09:01:35

4

to be Mike Mulcahy, M-u-l-c-a-h-y, Larry Meyer, M-e-y-e-r,

Robert Bevis, B-e-v-i-s, Frank Sodetz, S-o-d-e-t-z, from the

FBI, Vanessa Choate, C-h-o-a-t-e, she is a records custodian

from AT&T, Eleanor Farkas, F-a-r-k-a-s, Marilyn Thorpe,

T-h-o-r-p-e, Erin --

THE COURT: Who is she with?

MR. PERCONTE: They are both fact witnesses. They

both worked for Mr. Dvorkin for a time.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. PERCONTE: Erin Gabor, G-a-b-o-r, a computer

forensic examiner from the FBI.

THE COURT: Erin is E-r-i-n?

MR. PERCONTE: I believe that is right.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. PERCONTE: That is right.

And that is it for I guess the witnesses that we

intend to call in our case.

I think there are two other witnesses, I don't know

if you want to do rebuttal witnesses at this time as well

potentially, but Karen Kosbab, K-o-s-b-a-b, and --

MR. FRANKEL: She also has had other names and it

might be worth --

THE COURT: Excuse me?

MR. FRANKEL: It might be worth running the other

names, too.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 4 of 130 PageID #:2532
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:01:35

09:01:38

09:01:46

09:01:49

09:01:52

09:01:55

09:01:55

09:01:59

09:02:00

09:02:01

09:02:03

09:02:12

09:02:18

09:02:21

09:02:22

09:02:23

09:02:24

09:02:26

09:02:27

09:02:30

09:02:32

09:02:34

09:02:35

09:02:36

09:02:38

5

MR. PERCONTE: Montgomery was one, Hartney was

another, H-a-r-t-n-e-y. And then Eric Rossi, R-o-s-s-i.

Those would be rebuttal only witnesses, and I don't know how

the Court wants to handle those.

We may be adding one or two, I just don't have them

at this time.

THE COURT: I would rather be safe than sorry with

the witnesses.

And then for the defense?

MR. WALLIN: Your Honor, we will have William

Truemper, Alexander Kerr, Junior, Daniel DeSanti, Jeffrey

Hartney, Steven Bob.

THE COURT: Spell that last name.

MR. WALLIN: B-o-b

THE COURT: And who is he?

MR. WALLIN: He is a Rabbi.

MR. FRANKEL: He is a character witness.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. WALLIN: We will also have Michael Yessner.

THE COURT: Spelling on that one then.

MR. WALLIN: Y-e-s-s-n-e-r.

THE COURT: Okay.

And who is that?

MR. FRANKEL: He is also a character witness.

THE COURT: Okay.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 5 of 130 PageID #:2533
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:02:38

09:02:43

09:02:43

09:02:46

09:02:50

09:02:51

09:02:56

09:02:56

09:02:58

09:03:00

09:03:01

09:03:04

09:03:05

09:03:09

09:03:10

09:03:12

09:03:13

09:03:15

09:03:29

09:03:29

09:03:32

09:03:38

09:03:38

09:03:41

09:03:43

6

MR. WALLIN: And then James Stahller, also a

character witness.

THE COURT: And Staller is spelled S-t-a-l-l-e-r?

MR. WALLIN: I believe it is o-l-l-e-r, your Honor.

THE COURT: Okay.

So not Michael Tuchman?

MR. WALLIN: No.

MR. FRANKEL: No, not Michael Tuchman.

THE COURT: I will take him off the list.

Then that covers it?

MR. FRANKEL: Judge, there is a witness that may or

may not be called.

MR. WALLIN: Adalia Gibson.

THE COURT: Gibson, okay.

Another character witness?

MR. WALLIN: No.

And actually, she would potentially be there to

discuss ledgers of payment. She is a former employee of Dan

Development, Ltd.

MR. FRANKEL: Judge, I guess part of her testimony

would be as custodian of records.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. PERCONTE: I guess we can cross that bridge when

we get to it. I don't know what kind of payments we are

talking about. If they are payments that Mr. Bevis made

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 6 of 130 PageID #:2534
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:03:47

09:03:48

09:03:48

09:03:51

09:03:53

09:03:54

09:03:57

09:03:57

09:03:59

09:04:00

09:04:03

09:04:06

09:04:09

09:04:10

09:04:12

09:04:19

09:04:22

09:04:27

09:04:35

09:04:37

09:04:40

09:04:42

09:04:45

09:04:49

09:04:52

7

regarding rent to Mr. Dvorkin, then that would be in strictest

confidence trying to prove up some sort of impeachment, and

that would be improper if it was --

MR. WALLIN: I believe it was --

MR. PERCONTE: I --

MR. WALLIN: I believe it was bias when we originally

discussed it, your Honor.

THE COURT: So is that what you would go to?

MR. WALLIN: Potentially, your Honor.

MR. FRANKEL: It depends on his testimony. He may

make some claim during his testimony, and if he does, then we

have her available to rebut whatever claims he is going to

make.

THE COURT: Then let's cross that bridge if we get to

it.

Then let me tell you what I propose to read as a

statement of the case to the jurors right before jury

selection, the questioning, begins. It will be something like

this:

Let me tell you a little bit about the case. The

charges against the defendant are in a document called an

indictment. The indictment in this case has two types of

charges, they are similar but not exactly the same. First is

the charge that the defendant solicited another person to

commit a crime of violence, in this case, a murder for hire.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 7 of 130 PageID #:2535
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:04:57

09:04:59

09:05:04

09:05:05

09:05:08

09:05:11

09:05:15

09:05:19

09:05:22

09:05:25

09:05:27

09:05:29

09:05:31

09:05:32

09:05:33

09:05:33

09:05:34

09:05:37

09:05:40

09:05:44

09:05:50

09:05:52

09:05:56

09:06:01

09:06:05

8

The second type of charge is that the defendant used

telephones and a car with the intent that a murder for hire be

committed.

The indictment is simply the formal way of telling

the defendant what crimes he is accused of committing. It is

not evidence that the defendant is guilty. It is not even --

it does not even raise a suspicion of guilt.

Mr. Dvorkin denies each and every one of the charges.

So the purpose of this statement is to see if they

say, Hey, wait a minute, I read about this.

Any objection from the government?

MR. PERCONTE: Not from the government.

THE COURT: From the defense?

MR. WALLIN: No.

MR. FRANKEL: No, your Honor.

THE COURT: Okay.

I also propose, after we have seated the jury,

reading them some general preliminary instructions, not the

elements instructions, I think we discussed that last week,

but instructions on the following:

That I am going to be the decider of questions of law

and that they should not take anything that I say as evidence

of -- as indicating an opinion of what I think the evidence is

or what I think their verdict should be. The order of trial,

so I will describe to them that there will be opening

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 8 of 130 PageID #:2536
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:06:08

09:06:10

09:06:14

09:06:16

09:06:21

09:06:24

09:06:27

09:06:31

09:06:34

09:06:41

09:06:47

09:06:49

09:06:52

09:06:56

09:06:59

09:07:02

09:07:06

09:07:21

09:07:26

09:07:29

09:07:33

09:07:40

09:07:43

09:07:48

09:07:52

9

statements, and opening statements are simply a summary and

not evidence. Then the government will call witnesses after

opening statements and the defendant will have the opportunity

to call witnesses and present evidence. Then after the

parties' main cases are completed, the government may be

allowed to present rebuttal evidence. Closings are after the

evidence. Then I will say that I will instruct you on the

law, and then you go and deliberate on your verdict.

I also intend to read to them the burden of proof

instruction from the Seventh Circuit pattern. I will tell

them that the defendant is presumed innocent of each and every

one of the charges, and that the presumption continues

throughout the case, including during deliberations, it is not

overcome unless from all the evidence in the case you are

convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is

guilty as charged. The defendant has -- the government has

the burden of proving -- wait, I'm sorry, I duplicated the --

okay. The defendant is never required to prove his innocence.

He is not required to produce any evidence at all.

Then I am going to describe that evidence consists of

testimony, exhibits, any stipulations. They are going to be

the ones that have to decide credibility. What is not

evidence, including your statements, arguments, questions,

objections, any testimony I instruct them to disregard,

anything they see or hear when court is not in session.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 9 of 130 PageID #:2537
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:07:58

09:08:00

09:08:03

09:08:09

09:08:12

09:08:16

09:08:19

09:08:23

09:08:25

09:08:29

09:08:35

09:08:39

09:08:40

09:08:43

09:08:45

09:08:49

09:08:51

09:08:53

09:08:53

09:08:56

09:08:59

09:09:02

09:09:05

09:09:09

09:09:12

10

Rulings on objections, that they shouldn't get

annoyed if you make objections, and don't infer anything from

my rulings. Bench conferences, that we are going to try to

keep the side bars to a minimum. They are going to be allowed

to take notes, but they are only aids to memory, so pay close

attention because you will not get the transcript. And if I

ask questions, don't think that it means that I hold any

opinion on the matters I ask about.

And then the jury conduct instruction about not

discussing the case with anyone, no posting on Facebook, no

Tweeting, avoid news stories and so on, and don't make outside

research.

Anything you want me to subtract or add?

MR. FRANKEL: Judge, did you say that they should not

go to Facebook or go to the Internet to look up this case or

find news about the case?

THE COURT: Yes, it is going to be -- I will just

read it to you:

First, you must not discuss this case with anyone,

including your fellow jurors, members of your family, people

involved in the trial or anyone else. This also includes

posting anything on social media about the case, whether it is

on your Facebook page, a Tweet on your Twitter account,

blogging about the trial in any way -- all of these things

have happened, by the way -- and any statements about the

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 10 of 130 PageID #:2538
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:09:14

09:09:15

09:09:17

09:09:20

09:09:21

09:09:24

09:09:29

09:09:33

09:09:36

09:09:36

09:09:41

09:09:43

09:09:46

09:09:49

09:09:49

09:09:51

09:09:55

09:09:56

09:09:57

09:09:57

09:10:03

09:10:09

09:10:15

09:10:17

09:10:20

11

case.

You must not let others discuss the case with you.

If anyone tries to talk to you about the case please let me

know about it immediately.

Second, because it is a list, you must not read any

news stories or articles or listen to any radio or television

reports about the case or about anyone who has anything to do

with it. And the same goes for learning about the case on the

Internet.

Then third, you must not do any research such as

consulting dictionaries, searching the Internet, or using

other reference materials. Do not make any investigation

about the case, the parties, the lawyers, or the Court on your

own.

There is an instruction about: If you need to

communicate with me, give a signed note. And then to keep an

open mind.

Is that all right?

MR. FRANKEL: Yes.

THE COURT: I mean, if tomorrow we see news reports,

I might tell them, the seated jury, to just stop looking at

the local papers for the duration of the trial.

Anything you want me to add or subtract?

MR. FRANKEL: I don't know if it is covered with the

Court, the overview you gave, but I believe I heard in the

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 11 of 130 PageID #:2539
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:10:23

09:10:26

09:10:30

09:10:34

09:10:37

09:10:38

09:10:39

09:10:41

09:10:44

09:10:45

09:10:48

09:10:52

09:10:55

09:11:00

09:11:04

09:11:09

09:11:11

09:11:14

09:11:16

09:11:19

09:11:23

09:11:24

09:11:27

09:11:27

09:11:29

12

past an instruction where essentially the lawyers can't talk

to the jurors, and so if we see them in the hallway and our

head is down, it is not that we are being rude to them, it is

that you explicitly instructed us not to do that and so we

can't.

THE COURT: Yes.

MR. PERCONTE: If that is okay with defense counsel.

Then they can understand if we see them and buzz by

them that --

THE COURT: The only reason I didn't put it here is I

anticipate we will take a break in the middle and I will tell

them then, if you see them at the break they are not being

unfriendly, and tell your client and your witnesses and vice

versa to take the south bank of elevators, the jurors will --

the perspective jurors will take the north bank.

Anything you wanted me to add or subtract?

MR. FRANKEL: That was it, just about the elevators,

and you just indicated that.

THE COURT: Okay.

And did we talk about the length of opening? I am

not sure we did.

How long is your opening?

MS. MCSHAIN: About 12 minutes, your Honor.

THE COURT: I'm sorry?

MS. MCSHAIN: 12 minutes, about.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 12 of 130 PageID #:2540
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:11:29

09:11:32

09:11:34

09:11:34

09:11:35

09:11:40

09:11:42

09:11:45

09:11:45

09:11:45

09:11:48

09:11:52

09:11:56

09:11:58

09:12:07

09:12:13

09:12:14

09:12:19

09:12:20

09:12:22

09:12:28

09:12:31

09:12:33

09:12:36

09:12:38

13

THE COURT: Are you sure it is not 13?

MR. PERCONTE: 12.25.

THE COURT: All right.

And then for the defense?

MR. FRANKEL: I would say about 12 minutes also.

THE COURT: Well, all right.

MR. PERCONTE: Maybe a little leeway on the end of

each of those, Judge, but I don't think we will have long

openings.

THE COURT: You can each have 18 minutes.

No, that is fine. I won't set a preset limit. If

you do ramble extra long, I will give you a warning of some

sort. Okay.

The defense motions that were filed over the weekend,

okay, the first has to do with Ms. Farkas.

MR. PERCONTE: Yes, Judge.

I don't know if you want defense counsel to go first

or --

THE COURT: Is there any other detail that you can

give me as to what Ms. Farkas is proposing to testify on this

topic?

MR. PERCONTE: Judge, we made obviously a disclosure

to defense counsel of what she said on Friday. This is the

first time we talked to her about this. So our -- the

testimony we would seek is that there was a time after

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 13 of 130 PageID #:2541
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:12:42

09:12:47

09:12:50

09:12:54

09:12:59

09:13:02

09:13:05

09:13:08

09:13:11

09:13:14

09:13:18

09:13:21

09:13:24

09:13:27

09:13:32

09:13:33

09:13:37

09:13:39

09:13:43

09:13:43

09:13:47

09:13:51

09:13:54

09:13:57

09:13:57

14

Mr. Dvorkin had been charged where Mr. Dvorkin took her to the

hallway and said, You don't want me to go to jail, do you?

And that is it. We will not ask her what she understood that

to mean. We will not ask her, you know, how she felt about

that. We turned that over to the defense because that is part

of what we asked her during that -- during the witness

interview on Friday, but we are not going to ask those

questions, but we think it is evidence, the statement itself,

we believe we should be able to elicit and argue and

consciousness of guilt, and the reason why is that Mr. Dvorkin

at that time had been charged by a criminal complaint and in

the criminal complaint it was alleged that Mr. Dvorkin had

provided particular documents, identification documents,

regarding Larry Meyer to Mr. Bevis, who then turned them over

to the FBI.

At trial we anticipate Ms. Farkas is going to testify

that she was the person that printed those documents and left

them for Mr. Dvorkin. Her handwriting appears on one of those

documents.

And so the suggestion that after he is charged and

has read them in the complaint, that he then approaches

Ms. Farkas and takes her out in the hallway and says, You

don't want me to go to jail, do you? To which she responded,

No. Then the conversation ended.

Just eliciting facts itself is consciousness of

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 14 of 130 PageID #:2542
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:14:02

09:14:07

09:14:08

09:14:10

09:14:13

09:14:16

09:14:20

09:14:24

09:14:28

09:14:31

09:14:36

09:14:36

09:14:37

09:14:39

09:14:43

09:14:46

09:14:49

09:14:52

09:14:53

09:14:56

09:14:59

09:15:06

09:15:07

09:15:08

09:15:13

15

guilt. Obviously defense counsel can argue otherwise, they

can argue that it didn't happen, but we think it is relevant,

it is consciousness of guilt, we ought to be able to just

elicit that statement, not get into her understanding, not to

try to paint this as an instruction type thing where he was

trying to intimidate a witness, and that is why we are not

going to ask her how she felt or what she took it to mean, but

we will argue that that statement was essentially similar to

the statements he made on May 11th to Mr. Bevis where he

encouraged him to say certain things to the FBI, consciousness

of guilt.

So that is why we want to elicit that statement, we

think it fits. Now it is after the fact but, of course, as

the Court pointed out in its order on other motions, that the

evidence comes after the fact does not mean it is not relevant

as confessions come after the fact, jail calls sometimes where

a defendant makes statements about a case come after the fact,

this is in that vein.

So Judge, for that reason, we think it is relevant,

it is admissible, we don't tend to dwell on it, we certainly

don't intend to put in a statement that Mr. Dvorkin paid for

her attorney, we are -- we are not going down that road. So

we want to keep it very limited. We are not looking to make

this a circus, just a couple questions about it. We think it

is within the consciousness of guilt area of law.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 15 of 130 PageID #:2543
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:15:17

09:15:19

09:15:19

09:15:24

09:15:27

09:15:29

09:15:31

09:15:33

09:15:35

09:15:39

09:15:42

09:15:45

09:15:49

09:15:55

09:15:57

09:16:00

09:16:04

09:16:07

09:16:10

09:16:10

09:16:15

09:16:18

09:16:21

09:16:25

09:16:28

16

MR. WALLIN: Your Honor, if I may respond briefly.

THE COURT: Sure.

MR. WALLIN: First of all, in the information we

received from the government there is no indication that he

took her out in the hall, and this is the first time I am

hearing about that. And second of all, it does not say

whether it was before or after the indictment.

Now, if I understand the Court's previous ruling

regarding the consciousness of guilt evidence, that all took

place within circumstances where it could be argued that it

was consciousness of guilty. However, in this situation, we

have no circumstances to shed any light on what he meant when

he said that. It is completely subjective and I think it is

kind of taking it out of context in a way, your Honor.

MR. FRANKEL: Judge, also, her testimony is

completely -- it is what it is. She is going to say I

printed out these documents. There is nothing that could

change about what her role was here in this case and what she

did.

Mr. Dvorkin could have no expectation that she would

say anything other than, I printed out those documents. She

is not going to say, I knew about the solicitation or I

witnessed meetings or this or that, all she is going to say

is, One day he asked me to print out these pieces in paper.

So the comments they are saying is consciousness of

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 16 of 130 PageID #:2544
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:16:33

09:16:36

09:16:39

09:16:43

09:16:46

09:16:50

09:16:54

09:16:58

09:17:03

09:17:04

09:17:08

09:17:13

09:17:17

09:17:17

09:17:20

09:17:24

09:17:27

09:17:28

09:17:33

09:17:39

09:17:43

09:17:46

09:17:49

09:17:49

09:17:55

17

guilt, and I suppose what they are saying is he is making a

comment to somehow influence her testimony. There is nothing

that she can say that will be influenced by any comment from

Mr. Dvorkin. So it has no probative value at all and it is

obviously prejudicial to us and unfairly so, because it opens

a door for an argument that Mr. Dvorkin was prowling the

hallways of his company trying to squelch people from

cooperating with the government, and that is just not true.

This is -- I don't even -- This is all brand new to

us. We haven't talked to anybody about this. I just think it

is not probative enough of anything, and it is highly, highly

damaging, it is just wrong to admit it, and especially at this

late date.

She can still give the full range of her testimony

about, I was working that day, he came me and asked me to

print this out, they can get everything they need from her,

nothing will change from that.

THE COURT: Some of that is hyperbole, and I say that

with a smile on my face because I understand your concern that

the jury might, you know, run away with this idea that there

was some kind of obstruction campaign, but I don't think the

government is going to be arguing that, and they said they

won't.

But the problem with the evidence is that -- the

actual problem with the evidence is that it is only relevant

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 17 of 130 PageID #:2545
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:18:00

09:18:03

09:18:08

09:18:15

09:18:20

09:18:23

09:18:26

09:18:29

09:18:34

09:18:37

09:18:39

09:18:45

09:18:50

09:18:58

09:19:04

09:19:08

09:19:12

09:19:19

09:19:21

09:19:27

09:19:34

09:19:39

09:19:40

09:19:44

09:19:49

18

to the defendant's state of mind, okay, what you say is

consciousness of guilt, and so even if you strip out from the

witness' testimony the witness' understanding of what the

defendant meant, there actually are plenty of times where a

witness, whether it was a defense witness or a government

witness, is permitted to say, Well, we had this conversation,

and because that witness is a participant in the conversation,

they can have an understanding of the conversation that is,

you know, firmly based, and that would help the jury

understand the conversation.

If this was just literally she is in the hallway and

he -- and he says this one sentence to her it is not much of a

conversation, and so what I fear is that, in fact, the

inference that is being asked to be drawn is very shaky, and

in some ways it is worse that you are not proposing to have

Ms. Farkas testify to her understanding of what is meant, you

are just going to argue off of it, and so the fact that it is

worse that she is not testifying to understand it I think

really highlights the fact that you really are proposing to

infer from this one very brief statement, that is not very

clear on its face, an inference that is too speculative and

not reasonable.

So unless the defense opens the door, and I can

imagine in cross -- maybe they don't plan to do this, but --

were you try to -- okay, forget it. I don't have to

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 18 of 130 PageID #:2546
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:19:54

09:19:55

09:20:00

09:20:02

09:20:08

09:20:15

09:20:29

09:20:40

09:20:44

09:20:47

09:20:50

09:20:54

09:21:03

09:21:04

09:21:05

09:21:09

09:21:15

09:21:19

09:21:22

09:21:25

09:21:29

09:21:31

09:21:35

09:21:37

09:21:41

19

strategize.

So unless the defense opens the door, she shall not

testify as to this brief statement.

Now -- so I am left in suspense, the motion to

exclude Mr. Rossi's testimony and Ms. Kosbab -- I am being

handed for the record a 302 of Mr. Rossi. This was an

interview of August 7th, 2012.

So what is the argument here?

MR. PERCONTE: Well, Judge, I think as of last

Wednesday, I want to say, we received the motion in limine

from Mr. Dvorkin indicating that he intended to call witnesses

who were going to opine or testify regarding his verification

for law abidingness. So that will apparently -- that will

perhaps put that at issue.

Mr. Rossi was a business partner with Mr. Dvorkin.

He details at some point in some length there reasons why he

thinks that Mr. Dvorkin has engaged in fraudulent transactions

as part of his business dealings, and we would not get into

those in front of the jury, obviously. We would simply call

him, ask him if is he familiar with Mr. Dvorkin, based on his

business dealings with him, which is very similar to the

foundational questions that will be allowed, my understanding,

to be asked regarding character witnesses that the defense

intends to call regarding our witnesses, or one of our

witnesses. Then we will ask Mr. Rossi whether he has formed

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 19 of 130 PageID #:2547
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:21:45

09:21:49

09:21:54

09:21:55

09:21:57

09:22:04

09:22:07

09:22:10

09:22:13

09:22:14

09:22:16

09:22:23

09:22:23

09:22:28

09:22:29

09:22:31

09:22:35

09:22:40

09:22:43

09:22:46

09:22:50

09:22:55

09:22:58

09:23:01

09:23:03

20

an opinion based on those interactions regarding whether

Mr. Dvorkin is a law abiding citizen or not, and he can opine

on that.

It is the defense's decision whether they want to put

this at issue. Rule 404(a) gives us the right to respond to

the defendant's character and put in our ever own evidence as

to his character. So if he seeks to introduce it that is what

we intend to do with Mr. Rossi. I think we are seeking

additional avenues as well.

But part of this is -- we obviously were not going to

call Mr. Rossi in our case in chief ever because we are not

proving up a fraud case against Mr. Dvorkin and we don't

intend to prove up a fraud case with his testimony, but

instead, we will ask him five or six foundational questions,

ask him his opinion, and that will be it.

Otherwise, it would allow -- the irony in the motion

is that with respect to Mr. Hartney and Mr. DeSanti, they also

have made allegations regarding one of our witnesses,

regarding their business dealings, and none of those have been

adjudicated that I know of. Mr. DeSanti never even sued.

Just like Mr. Rossi never sued Mr. Dvorkin, Mr. DeSanti never

sued Mr. Bevis. So if anything, this closely parallels the

type of character evidence that the defense intends to

introduce in this case and about our witnesses.

So for that reason I think testimony would be proper.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 20 of 130 PageID #:2548
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:23:06

09:23:10

09:23:13

09:23:17

09:23:19

09:23:22

09:23:25

09:23:29

09:23:31

09:23:35

09:23:38

09:23:41

09:23:47

09:23:51

09:23:56

09:24:00

09:24:04

09:24:04

09:24:09

09:24:13

09:24:15

09:24:16

09:24:17

09:24:17

09:24:19

21

We would be happy to do a voir dire outside the presence of a

jury if the Court would like, but we have a right to respond

to this evidence that Mr. Dvorkin is a law abiding wallflower

and this is how we intend to do it.

MR. WALLIN: Your Honor, there is a key difference

between us presenting a character witness regarding Mr. Bevis

and the government presenting a character witness about

Mr. Dvorkin, and that is Mr. Dvorkin is the defendant here,

and so the risk of undo prejudice is a little bit different,

and in this situation, 403 still applies.

So, whatever very low probative value this has to say

that in a few foundational questions and in his opinion

Mr. Dvorkin isn't law abiding, will be overcome greatly by,

again, saying he is law abiding implying -- showing that is he

not law abiding, that there are other accusations potentially

pending out there that will fall upon Mr. Dvorkin if it comes

to that.

So in that situation, given the low relevance in this

-- of this testimony, and the high undo prejudice, it should

be excluded under 403.

MR. FRANKEL: Judge --

THE COURT: It is --

MR. FRANKEL: I'm sorry.

THE COURT: Go ahead.

MR. FRANKEL: It is 404(b) potentially, and there has

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 21 of 130 PageID #:2549
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:24:21

09:24:24

09:24:26

09:24:26

09:24:29

09:24:33

09:24:41

09:24:47

09:24:51

09:24:55

09:25:02

09:25:08

09:25:16

09:25:17

09:25:23

09:25:28

09:25:34

09:25:40

09:25:43

09:25:46

09:25:49

09:25:53

09:26:02

09:26:03

09:26:06

22

been no notice. You can see how old that 302 is.

MR. PERCONTE: It is not 4 --

THE COURT: Let's not -- don't.

The 404(b) argument is rejected because it is not

going to get into specific instances of conduct. They are not

proving -- they are not using 404(b) evidence here. This is

to rebut the character for lawful -- for law abidingness.

And on that point, it is -- it has strong probative

value because it is a character witness going the other way,

disputing that specific point, and based on my scan of this

business relationship, this witness has more than sufficient

foundation to opine on Mr. Dvorkin's character for law

abidingness.

So while I recognize that the target of the now

anti-character evidence is the defendant himself, I must take

extra care. The specific factual issue that this evidence

rebuts is his character for law abidingness, and since that

has been put directly at issue by the defendant, it actually

has strong probative value, and because the defendant will not

be -- I'm sorry, the government won't be getting into specific

instances of misconduct to prove up this character trait,

there is -- there is not an undo prejudice to this piece of

evidence.

So Mr. Rossi can testify as to this.

I think I am a little more concerned about whether

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 22 of 130 PageID #:2550
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:26:11

09:26:14

09:26:19

09:26:21

09:26:22

09:26:27

09:26:30

09:26:31

09:26:31

09:26:34

09:26:35

09:26:41

09:26:42

09:26:43

09:26:48

09:26:50

09:26:54

09:26:59

09:27:03

09:27:07

09:27:09

09:27:12

09:27:16

09:27:19

09:27:23

23

or not -- do you plan on trying to cross the defendant's

character witnesses with questions off of this evidence?

MR. PERCONTE: No.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. PERCONTE: I mean, our cross of the defendant's

character witnesses will focus more on the fact that they knew

nothing about this case.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. PERCONTE: We will not get into these acts with

those witnesses.

Now, the defendant would be potentially a different

story but we can get into that.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. FRANKEL: Judge, if you put -- traditionally, if

you put on a character witness, they can confront the

character witness with specific instances of misconduct to try

to undermine their testimony, but to put on a collateral

witness, another character witness, that is collateral to the

presentation of the initial character witness testimony.

I just think it is getting too far afield.

THE COURT: I disagree.

The character -- this is just anti-character

evidence, but specifically in the form of opinion or

reputation testimony, and I think it is actually infinitely

better for the defendant if it comes in this way through

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 23 of 130 PageID #:2551
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:27:28

09:27:32

09:27:37

09:27:41

09:27:45

09:27:47

09:27:48

09:27:51

09:27:55

09:28:01

09:28:08

09:28:10

09:28:11

09:28:11

09:28:13

09:28:16

09:28:18

09:28:21

09:28:24

09:28:27

09:28:30

09:28:32

09:28:36

09:28:41

09:28:41

24

character evidence in opinion or testimony, just at this

generalized level, then to do what you just suggested and what

I just asked the government that they plan on crossing, using

this as a good faith basis for specific cross examination

questions, and they should have said no they are not going to

do that.

MR. FRANKEL: Well, Judge, I am going to have to

re-evaluate my approach regarding the character evidence.

For the opening, in any event, I am just going to talk about

character evidence for peaceful behavior and we will have to

make a decision later about whether or not we will put in law

abidingness.

THE COURT: Okay.

MR. PERCONTE: Judge, because the defendant has to

open the door to character evidence we are not going to

mention character evidence in our case in chief or in our

opening. This is for a rebuttal witness only. So just to be

clear, we will not be getting into this in our case at chief

or in our opening. We have to wait to do this, obviously,

until the defense decides to call him, and if the defense

wants to call a character witness --

MR. FRANKEL: I assume I am not opening the door to

this testimony if we restrict our character testimony to a

reputation of peacefulness.

MR. PERCONTE: No.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 24 of 130 PageID #:2552
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:28:42

09:28:43

09:28:43

09:28:43

09:28:43

09:28:43

09:28:45

09:28:45

09:28:46

09:29:16

09:29:22

09:29:27

09:29:31

09:29:36

09:29:37

09:29:39

09:29:41

09:29:42

09:29:44

09:29:47

09:29:50

09:29:52

09:29:55

09:30:03

09:30:08

25

THE COURT: Right.

Mr. Rossi has nothing to say on it.

MR. FRANKEL: No, nothing to say.

THE COURT: You can game-time audible on that one

then.

MR. FRANKEL: Right.

MR. PERCONTE: Yes.

THE COURT: One second.

(Discussion held off the record.)

The jury department is saying that one of the jurors

that has called in has now passed the magic threshold of 70,

so he or she may excuse him or herself and has decided to do

that. So we have dropped down to -- so I have called 39

jurors.

Do you want me to pull one extra?

MR. FRANKEL: I think so.

THE COURT: Okay.

Then we will pull one more.

MR. FRANKEL: Judge, could we have that 302 back?

THE COURT: Yes.

What I would like you to do is file the two motions

you made over the weekend on the docket, and if you could

attach that under seal. If you don't know -- you will figure

it out, attach it under seal so there is an understanding of

the basis of the ruling.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 25 of 130 PageID #:2553
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:30:08

09:30:10

09:30:13

09:30:16

09:30:19

09:30:19

09:30:20

09:30:20

09:30:23

09:30:24

09:30:26

09:30:29

09:30:32

09:30:38

09:30:39

09:30:44

09:30:45

09:30:48

09:30:51

09:30:54

09:30:56

09:30:59

09:31:02

09:31:07

09:31:09

26

MR. WALLIN: Your Honor, if I could just get an

order, a minute entry, to file it under seal, I think the

clerk's office needs that to allow me to do that.

THE COURT: I am not sure you need that any more,

but --

MR. WALLIN: Oh, really?

THE COURT: Yes.

MR. WALLIN: Last time I tried it and didn't have an

order they --

THE COURT: Really? I will put it in here.

Ms. Kosbab.

MR. PERCONTE: Ms. Kosbab, Judge, will testify as to

her opinion regarding the truthfulness of Jeffrey Hartney who

is a witness and who is going to be called by the defense as a

potential harbinger of Mr. Dvorkin's truthfulness.

Again, it is the same thing. We are not getting into

specific acts, just do you know the person, how do you know

him, she was married to him for a number of years, she is no

longer married to him, but they were married for I think 15

years or something like that. And then did you form an

opinion as to his truthfulness, and what is that opinion.

Story over. We are not going to get into specific acts, we

are not going to get into underlying divorce proceedings with

her.

So that is the testimony. I think that is

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 26 of 130 PageID #:2554
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:31:12

09:31:15

09:31:17

09:31:21

09:31:21

09:31:24

09:31:29

09:31:30

09:31:33

09:31:34

09:31:34

09:31:36

09:31:38

09:31:43

09:31:48

09:31:51

09:31:55

09:32:01

09:32:03

09:32:06

09:32:10

09:32:14

09:32:18

09:32:21

09:32:25

27

appropriate under Rule 608(a), any testimony as to a witness'

character for truthfulness.

Mr. Hartney is being offered as a witness who can

opine on someone else's truthfulness, and so his character is

in play. I don't think -- again, there are not many

questions. Certainly he can be cross examined by the defense

regarding --

THE COURT: And again, you do not plan on using --

MR. PERCONTE: No specific acts.

THE COURT: Right.

Even in the cross of Mr. Hartney?

MR. PERCONTE: Well, that is a different story.

Mr. Hartney -- and this I learned from Google and

looking up orders in his divorce proceeding, was enjoined for

fraudulently transferring assets during his divorce. Now we

would not ask about the injunction, but we would ask about the

transfer of the assets because that is -- that we would argue

is a specific instance that would go to his truthfulness.

We can't prove that up, and we would not prove it up

through Ms. Kosbab, but we are allowed to ask about it just as

the defense intends to ask Mr. Bevis about all of these

instances with Mr. Hartney and Mr. DeSanti. So it is fair for

us to ask Mr. Hartney about any instances that go to his

character of truthfulness, and not to prove it up, but to at

least be able to ask him.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 27 of 130 PageID #:2555
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:32:30

09:32:32

09:32:36

09:32:38

09:32:42

09:32:42

09:32:46

09:32:46

09:32:49

09:32:53

09:32:55

09:32:57

09:33:02

09:33:05

09:33:09

09:33:13

09:33:17

09:33:21

09:33:24

09:33:27

09:33:29

09:33:33

09:33:39

09:33:41

09:33:45

28

Now I want to be clear, we would not attempt to

elicit testimony from Ms. Kosbab for the jury to draw any

inference as to whether he had told the truth as far as when

he responds that he fraudulently transferred assets and things

like that.

THE COURT: Do you know any of the details of the

finding?

MR. PERCONTE: We just got all the divorce paperwork

this morning. It is being Bates stamped and we will produce

it to defense at lunch time.

I have not been through all of it, some of the

affidavits that were filed, and I have been able to find

online from Google. So I will have -- I can assure the Court

that we will have a good faith basis for the questions, be

able to discuss those with the Court before we cross examine

Mr. Hartney. We will not come up here and just ask baseless

questions, and I think Mr. Frankel and Mr. Wallin will have an

idea of the basis for the questions when we turn it over.

And we just received it over the weekend or Friday

afternoon. It is a little box of stuff.

THE COURT: And setting aside that specific instance,

do you have a 302 that summarizes what Ms. Kosbab --

MR. PERCONTE: We turned that over last week, early

last week. Right after we interviewed her we turned it over.

THE COURT: Do you have a copy that I could take a

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 28 of 130 PageID #:2556
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:33:47

09:33:47

09:33:49

09:33:51

09:35:31

09:35:32

09:35:32

09:35:34

09:35:38

09:35:41

09:35:44

09:35:47

09:35:51

09:35:56

09:36:00

09:36:03

09:36:06

09:36:08

09:36:11

09:36:17

09:36:17

09:36:19

09:36:29

09:36:32

09:36:38

29

look at.

MR. PERCONTE: I don't know if --

MR. WALLIN: I do if you don't have one, Judge.

THE COURT: Yes.

MR. WALLIN: Okay.

Do you have any response?

MR. WALLIN: Your Honor, our defense position is that

this is collateral. Mr. Hartney is offered as a character

witness to begin with, so now this is a character witness

about a character witness. It just will confuse the jury and

it will add time to the trial unnecessarily.

The prosecution can cross Mr. Hartney on a number of

things as they intend to, if we do call him. And just as we

are doing with Mr. Bevis, they shouldn't be allowed to present

this testimony in order to -- while it won't necessarily be

proving things up per say, it will legitimize a lot of the

things that they are talking about, or asking him about on

cross, your Honor.

So we think under 403 it should be excluded.

THE COURT: Okay.

On the first point about it, about it being

collateral, once again, the defense, like the government,

their witnesses are subject to, you know, credibility

challenges. It is not collateral in the sense of, for

example, specific instance of untruthfulness that it then

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 29 of 130 PageID #:2557
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:36:42

09:36:47

09:37:00

09:37:06

09:37:10

09:37:13

09:37:20

09:37:28

09:37:31

09:37:36

09:37:44

09:37:49

09:37:54

09:37:58

09:38:03

09:38:07

09:38:11

09:38:15

09:38:22

09:38:26

09:38:30

09:38:35

09:38:45

09:38:48

09:38:50

30

cannot be proved up by extrinsic evidence. So this does go to

the credibility of the defense witness, and so it is relevant.

Then you articulated a concern about if Hartney is crossed on

a specific instance of untruthfulness in the divorce

proceeding that then the jury might make some kind of

connection from her otherwise generalized testimony about

character for truthfulness as evidentiary support for the

questions that otherwise would not be provable by extrinsic

evidence. That is a legitimate concern, but I don't think

that the jury, from the generalized testimony of a character

witness on truthfulness, will make that connection.

Now, I don't -- this 403 balancing needs some more

attention because we don't know right now what is alleged to

have happened in the underlying divorce that resulted in that

injunction or finding of fraudulent transfer, so we do need to

know a little bit more about that before I make a final

ruling. But I don't think generally speaking the jury is

going to draw some inference that, well, Ms. Kosbab has

testified here she was the opponent in the divorce proceeding,

and so, therefore, she must have lots of credible evidence in

the divorce proceeding, especially because no matter -- no

matter the general admissibility of this -- of these cross

examination questions that will be put to Mr. Hartney, the

State Court finding of a fraudulent transfer, that cannot come

in, because -- and the government is nodding its head, I think

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 30 of 130 PageID #:2558
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:38:55

09:38:58

09:39:02

09:39:05

09:39:06

09:39:17

09:39:21

09:39:26

09:39:30

09:39:36

09:39:40

09:39:45

09:39:47

09:39:51

09:39:55

09:39:57

09:40:01

09:40:05

09:40:08

09:40:12

09:40:15

09:40:18

09:40:23

09:40:26

09:40:29

31

it understands that is essentially the opinion of the State

Court, and that Judge ain't here. So that is not coming in

for sure. It would just be the underlying conduct that could

be crossed on.

I don't think that the jury is going to try to

connect the dots in this way. It is several dots removed.

MR. PERCONTE: Judge, I am willing to when we cross

examine Mr. Hartney on those instances not link it to his

marriage to this particular witness, you know, and just

generally refer to his divorce proceedings in a way that will

attempt to alleviate this concern that Mr. Wallin raised, and

I will explain why we are going to do this.

I think Mr. Wallin, the issue he has raised, is an

extremely valid one for the witnesses they intend to call.

They intend to cross examine Mr. Bevis regarding specific

instances of conduct that he engaged in with Mr. Hartney and

Mr. DeSanti, and then they intend to turn around and ask

those -- and from what I understand, they are going to spend

a significant amount of time on that, on fraud that Mr. Bevis

supposedly ran on those two individuals. Then they are going

to turn around and call those two individuals and ask them to

opine on Mr. Bevis's truthfulness, in a way, backdooring in

the specific acts through cross examination.

So we are willing to, in our cross examination of

Mr. Hartney, not refer to any specific divorce proceedings.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 31 of 130 PageID #:2559
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:40:33

09:40:37

09:40:40

09:40:45

09:40:47

09:40:52

09:40:55

09:40:58

09:41:01

09:41:08

09:41:08

09:41:09

09:41:10

09:41:13

09:41:17

09:41:20

09:41:23

09:41:26

09:41:30

09:41:34

09:41:36

09:41:40

09:41:42

09:41:42

09:41:45

32

I think that it would be appropriate when Mr. Bevis is being

cross examined by the defense, they can ask him about the

fraudulent -- about whether he was a fraudster with respect to

specific people, the specific acts that he did, whether he

made them promises, whether he sold them shares that were not

registered, whatever they want to get into, but I don't think

they need to mention the names of those folks when they do it,

and I think to do so would be to backdoor specific acts in

through Mr. Bevis, and unlike Mr. Hartney, that will be a

focus of Mr. Bevin on cross examintion, and so --

MR. FRANKEL: Judge --

MR. PERCONTE: (Continuing) -- we are more than happy

to talk about it in a more general term to make sure we are

not backdooring specific acts in through the joint testimony

of the cross examination of Mr. Hartney and the direct

examination of his wife, but we think that -- and this is a

genuine concern -- that the defense should not be able to do

that, they should not be able to cross examine Mr. Bevis

regarding the specific individuals that he defrauded and then

call those specific individuals to give their opinion for

truthfulness, because basically what they are doing is laying

the found -- the specific acts foundation through their cross

examination.

I believe the Court in its order and discussion last

week said it would specifically not allow cross examination to

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 32 of 130 PageID #:2560
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:41:49

09:41:51

09:41:54

09:41:59

09:42:01

09:42:05

09:42:07

09:42:15

09:42:18

09:42:22

09:42:27

09:42:31

09:42:36

09:42:37

09:42:43

09:42:45

09:42:49

09:42:54

09:43:00

09:43:05

09:43:10

09:43:12

09:43:14

09:43:15

09:43:17

33

be used for improper character evidence.

So I think all the questions can come out using

pronouns, or generalized descriptors, and I am not sure what

would be inappropriate about that.

THE COURT: You don't have to accept that compromise

position.

I have the same feeling about Mr. Bevis and his --

and the testimony of Mr. Hartney and Mr. DeSanti against him

as I do with respect to Ms. Kosbab's testimony against

Mr. Hartney, which is I do not think the jury will try to

connect the dots, because they will hear such little evidence

from these character witnesses that the risk is a very minimal

one.

In addition, this cast of characters, I must say, the

cross examiners, whether it is for the government or the

defense, you are entitled to put -- when I have allowed

specific questions because of Rule 608 -- to put as specific a

question to them, and the use of pronouns would just allow --

pronouns, defense or government, would just allow them to be

squirrely. And so I do not like the idea of a Company A, or a

company.

So don't worry, you don't have to do that, you don't

have to pull back on that.

Anything else you want to say?

MR. FRANKEL: Judge, I know you have made your

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 33 of 130 PageID #:2561
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:43:20

09:43:27

09:43:30

09:43:31

09:43:33

09:43:35

09:43:39

09:43:45

09:43:48

09:43:54

09:43:59

09:44:06

09:44:09

09:44:11

09:44:12

09:44:13

09:44:21

09:44:24

34

ruling, but just that Ms. Kosbab is -- she is -- she is his

ex-wife. How much probative value does this have about his

character?

THE COURT: I can't wait to hear you argue that to

the jury. But that is a jury argument.

One could also argue that, you know, someone who was

married to someone for 16 years is in the best position to

opine on someone's character for truthfulness or

untruthfulness. So that is a jury argument. It is a fine

one. But I do think she is -- she has sufficiently relevant

testimony with sufficient probative force to be admissible.

Again, they are not going to mention her in opening

either, so you can still audible on this one.

MR. PERCONTE: Rebuttal only.

THE COURT: Okay.

I think we have got our written questionnaires back

now. So you can take a seat and you can take a quick look at

these.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 34 of 130 PageID #:2562
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:54:02

09:54:05

09:54:07

09:54:18

09:54:21

09:54:24

09:54:28

09:54:32

09:54:37

09:54:41

09:54:43

09:54:46

09:55:06

09:55:07

09:55:08

09:55:10

09:55:11

09:55:11

09:55:16

09:55:21

09:55:24

09:55:25

09:55:28

09:55:30

35

VOIR DIRE

THE COURT: All right. Let's go on the record.

We have received copies of the scheduling

questionnaires that the prospective jurors have filled out.

Let's see if we can agree on anyone.

The first one who put an answer down was juror Number

3, and it says, My brother didn't have fair justice.

Obviously we need to make -- have some questions of this

juror, it is not a scheduling issue, but perhaps this reflects

her depth of feeling. So we need to question her. So she

will stay in the pool for now.

Number 4, this is the gentleman who is now 70 years

old. I will be excusing him.

No objection?

MR. PERCONTE: No.

MR. FRANKEL: At 70 they don't have to?

THE COURT: No.

MR. FRANKEL: Okay.

THE COURT: The next one that answered was Number 10,

Ms. Arestis, A-r-e-s-t-i-s, and she said, It has created a

hardship for our family owned business, which is open seven

days a week.

Does any side want to question her further?

MR. FRANKEL: I think we should, Judge.

THE COURT: Do you have a position?

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 35 of 130 PageID #:2563
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:55:32

09:55:33

09:55:37

09:55:45

09:55:50

09:55:54

09:55:56

09:56:00

09:56:02

09:56:10

09:56:13

09:56:18

09:56:21

09:56:30

09:56:30

09:56:34

09:56:39

09:56:43

09:56:47

09:56:51

09:57:06

09:57:09

09:57:11

09:57:14

09:57:16

36

MS. MCSHAIN: No position, your Honor.

THE COURT: We will question her further.

The next juror who wrote something was Number 14, his

name is Adamovich, and she stated, Childcare, I have a

kindergartner and second grader that I am responsible for

taking to school and there is no bus service.

Is there any objection to excusing her?

MS. MCSHAIN: Not from the government, your Honor.

THE COURT: For the defense?

MR. FRANKEL: It might be that we can schedule the

trial around her need to get to school. I hate to not ask her

further questions about what time they have to get to school,

does she have to -- is this a shared responsibility, Judge, or

is she --

THE COURT: We will ask her questions, okay.

I think what I may do is we will seat everyone for

questioning but then we will pull her over for a side bar and

ask her questions, because if they are legit, I will excuse

her from further questioning. That was Number 14.

The next juror who responded was Number 23,

Mr. Hodge, who says, I cannot make it because I have to give

kids a ride every day and my job.

Does either side want to question him further?

MR. FRANKEL: I would want to question him for the

same reason as the last one, Judge.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 36 of 130 PageID #:2564
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:57:17

09:57:28

09:57:40

09:57:44

09:57:48

09:57:53

09:57:57

09:57:58

09:57:59

09:58:00

09:58:03

09:58:15

09:58:19

09:58:25

09:58:28

09:58:33

09:58:36

09:58:39

09:58:40

09:58:40

09:58:54

09:58:58

09:59:02

09:59:06

09:59:10

37

THE COURT: Okay. That is Number 23.

The next respondent is Number 30. I am

self-employed, just started my own interior design business,

no employees, just me. I really can't afford to lose the work

and pay my bills. That is Ms. Swiatek, S-w-i-a-t-e-k.

MR. FRANKEL: I don't have any objection for her.

THE COURT: To excusing her?

MR. FRANKEL: Yes, that would be fine.

MS. MCSHAIN: No objection.

THE COURT: So Number 30 would be excused based on

her self-employment.

Then the next respondent is Number 33, Ms. Berger,

B-e-r-g-e-r, the school teacher in Evanston who -- This is the

first two weeks of school when I need to recruit my students.

I teach music. If I have to start recruitment two weeks

later, it will effect the school year for me.

Any objection for excusing her?

MS. MCSHAIN: No, your Honor.

MR. FRANKEL: No, your Honor.

THE COURT: She is excused, Number 33, Alison Berger.

Next respondent was Number 35, Daisy Smith, and she

responded, I work for Jewish organizations and it is closed on

September 5 and September 6, but we are confident it will end

before that date, so I take it you want to question her,

right?

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 37 of 130 PageID #:2565
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

09:59:11

09:59:14

09:59:15

09:59:19

09:59:23

09:59:24

09:59:25

09:59:26

09:59:28

09:59:32

09:59:36

09:59:40

09:59:46

09:59:48

09:59:53

09:59:55

10:00:03

10:00:03

10:00:07

10:00:11

10:00:15

10:00:18

10:00:20

10:00:22

10:00:26

38

MR. FRANKEL: I am not sure I even understand the

basis for the conflict.

THE COURT: It might just be out of -- I warned you,

on September 5th -- your right, it is closed.

MR. FRANKEL: Right.

THE COURT: We will ask her questions.

MR. FRANKEL: Okay.

THE COURT: I am not going to pull her aside, she

will go through all the questioning.

Then the next respondent, Number 39, a single mom

with no support. She just moved. I don't know anyone yet to

help get the kids to/from school. My mom drove two hours to

get them to school today.

I would guess there is no objection.

MS. MCSHAIN: No objection from the government.

MR. FRANKEL: No objection.

THE COURT: Okay.

So we will bring them up, put them in the box and

gallery, and then I think I will ask 14 and 23 to step to the

side bar and we will get through their scheduling issues.

Okay.

THE CLERK: The ones that are excused I am not

bringing up, Judge, right?

THE COURT: Right, you do not have to bring up the

ones we just excused.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 38 of 130 PageID #:2566
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:00:27

10:00:28

10:01:21

10:24:46

10:24:50

10:24:52

10:24:56

10:24:59

10:25:02

10:25:06

10:25:10

10:25:13

10:25:14

10:25:19

10:25:24

10:25:28

10:25:32

10:25:34

10:25:39

10:25:43

10:25:44

10:25:45

10:25:49

10:25:56

10:26:04

39

THE CLERK: Okay.

Thank you.

(Whereupon a recess was had.)

THE CLERK: All rise.

THE COURT: Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to Federal

Court. I am Judge Edmond Chang and I will be presiding over

this case. This is a criminal case that we will be picking a

jury for today. We have in front here our courtroom deputy

clerk, Ms. Sandra Brooks, you met her before, and I think you

also met in the jury department one of my law clerks, Devlin

Su, and we have sitting to my right the court reporter, who is

Krista Burgeson.

We are going to be picking a jury in United States

versus Daniel Dvorkin. I do appreciate your willingness to

serve on a jury. It really is one of the most important

community duties that we have to one another.

Now, before we go on, because you are going to be

answering questions during jury selection, I am going to ask

our courtroom deputy clerk here to administer an oath to you

to tell the truth.

Ms. Brooks?

THE CLERK: Will all of the jurors please rise and

raise your right hand?

( Voir Dire panel sworn. )

Thank you.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 39 of 130 PageID #:2567
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:26:05

10:26:09

10:26:12

10:26:16

10:26:21

10:26:24

10:26:29

10:26:33

10:26:36

10:26:40

10:26:42

10:26:47

10:26:48

10:26:53

10:26:59

10:27:06

10:27:10

10:27:13

10:27:17

10:27:21

10:27:40

10:28:06

10:28:41

10:29:10

10:29:29

40

THE COURT: You may be seated again.

Now we are going to call your names out in a specific

order and I will ask you to sit in a specific order as well.

So whoever is the first juror, I will ask you to come into the

jury box here and fill in the first row, you will take the

seat, juror number 1, that sits closest to the benches on that

side in the first row, then the second juror will sit to that

person's left, then third, and so on.

When we get to number 9, juror number 9 is going to

go into the back row, go all the way down, and then fill in

from 9, 10, 11, and so on, starting from the benches toward

the front of the courtroom.

Then juror number 17 is going to sit in the first

row, first bench, on your left side and closest to the wall.

Then I will ask you to try to fit in eight jurors, 17, 18, 19

and so on, until juror number 24, and then juror number 25

will fill in the row behind, and so on.

So we are going to do this one by one in

non-alphabetical order. So listen for your name.

Sal Salvato. Yousef Zaatar. Patricia Gabb.

Veronica Raigoza. Daniel Perlin. Karen Bialy. Celine

Heraty. Shaun Walsted. Gloria Arestis. Alicia Roby. Alvin

Hayashi. William Fasciana. Rachel Adamovich. John Gross.

Charlene Jurgovan. William Stafford.

Okay. Filling in the first bench there now. Justin

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 40 of 130 PageID #:2568
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:29:36

10:30:04

10:30:34

10:30:51

10:31:13

10:31:30

10:31:39

10:32:06

10:32:06

10:32:08

10:32:11

10:32:15

10:32:17

10:32:22

10:32:25

10:32:30

10:32:32

10:32:35

10:32:38

10:32:39

10:32:41

10:32:45

10:32:49

10:32:54

10:32:58

41

Gierke. Tom Chester. Marcie Delarosa. Jermaine Caprio.

James Broniec. Larry Hodge. Kristen Caruso. Anwar Akhras.

Then bench number two. Cori Barnes. Sandra Bottoms.

Mark Roberts. Jeffrey Foster. Donald Quirk. Kimberly Fiore.

Michelle Geoffroy. Daisy Smith.

And then bench number three. Lucy Pate. Bonnie

Mandell. Rocio Wilson. And Tracie Ward.

All right.

Before we start the questioning, Ladies and

Gentlemen, I want you to know our goal in asking you questions

is so that we get a fair and impartial jury. It is not of

course to embarrass you in any way. If there is any answer

that you would rather give privately, we can have a side bar

off to the side here and you don't have to talk about it in

open court, just myself and the lawyers. So if at any time

you want to have a side bar, just ask for it.

Certain of questions that I ask you I will -- I will

not give you an option, we will just talk about it at the side

bar here.

Let me tell you a little bit about this case. The

charges against the defendant are in a document called an

indictment. The indictment in this case has two types of

charges; they are similar, but not exactly the same. The

first type of charge is that the defendant solicited another

person to commit a crime of violence, in this case, a murder

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 41 of 130 PageID #:2569
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:33:04

10:33:09

10:33:14

10:33:17

10:33:21

10:33:26

10:33:30

10:33:36

10:33:39

10:33:43

10:33:47

10:33:51

10:33:54

10:33:55

10:33:56

10:33:59

10:34:04

10:34:07

10:34:08

10:34:09

10:34:13

10:34:16

10:34:19

10:34:20

10:34:25

42

for hire. The second type of charge is that the defendant

used telephones and a car with the intent that a murder for

hire be committed.

The indictment is simply the formal way of telling

the defendant what crimes he is accused of committing. It is

not evidence that the defendant is guilty. It does not even

raise a suspicion of guilt. Mr. Dvorkin, the defendant in

this case, denies each and every one of the charges.

Now does anyone here happen to know anything about

this case? Okay. I see no hands.

I am going to ask the lawyers now for both sides to

introduce themselves and anyone else sitting at the counsel

table.

For the government?

MS. MCSHAIN: My name is Heather McShain. Seated to

my left is Jeff Perconte. And then at the end of the table is

Special Agent Frank Sodetz.

THE COURT: For the defense?

MR. FRANKEL: Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen.

My name is Scott Frankel. I represent Dan Dvorkin,

who is sitting next to me. And with me at counsel table is

Mark Wallin, who is also trying the case.

THE COURT: Thank you.

Does anyone here happen to know any of the lawyers,

the defendant, or anyone else seated at counsel table? Okay.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 42 of 130 PageID #:2570
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:34:30

10:34:32

10:34:35

10:34:38

10:34:42

10:34:45

10:34:47

10:34:57

10:35:12

10:35:16

10:35:29

10:35:40

10:35:45

10:35:52

10:35:53

10:36:01

10:36:07

10:36:11

10:36:14

10:36:15

10:36:18

10:36:24

10:36:29

43

I see no hands.

I am now going to read a list of potential witnesses

and other persons that you might hear about during the trial.

I am going to ask you to listen carefully to this list,

because at the end of the list I will ask you do you happen to

know any of the potential witnesses.

Those are: Michael Mulcahy, Vanessa Choate, Robert

Bevis, Larry Meyer, Eleanor Farkas, Marilyn Thorpe, Erin

Gabor, Karen Kosbab, who also had the last names Montgomery

and Hartney, Eric Rossi, William Truemper, Steven Bob, Michael

Yesner, James Stoller, Adalia Gibson, Alexander Kerr, Jeffrey

Hartney, Daniel DeSanti.

Does anyone here happen to know anyone on that list?

Okay. No hands.

I am going to now ask you all to one by one, starting

with juror number 1, stand up, we are going to give a handheld

microphone, you can pretend you are on a talk show, but speak

as loudly as you can even with the microphone so we can all

hear you.

I am going to ask you to give us the biographical

information based on the questions in that cover letter that

you were given in the jury department.

So we will start with Mr. Salvato.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 43 of 130 PageID #:2571
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:36:38

10:36:49

10:36:52

10:36:55

10:37:01

10:37:08

10:37:15

10:37:23

10:37:34

10:37:38

10:37:46

10:37:48

10:37:53

10:38:00

10:38:08

10:38:09

10:38:12

10:38:13

10:38:13

10:38:16

10:38:20

44

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Mr. Salvato?

A. City is the Village of Berwyn, Illinois. I have been

there since '79.

I have a high school degree, diploma. I went to

college for a year and a half, did not graduate. I am self --

I was self-employed. I am a guitarist, currently right now I

am unemployed. I owned a business in the past. My wife owns

that right now. I was the manager and owner of a music store.

I have been married since '75. I have three children

and they are all in their 30's. My hobbies are playing

guitar. I walk a lot. And that is about it.

Q. If I can follow up on a few things.

Do you own or rent a home in Berwyn?

A. I own a home. I just lost it on back taxes.

Q. But you are still living in that home for now?

A. Yes, yes.

Q. Now, you said your wife owns the business. Is that the

music store?

A. Yes, it is.

Q. And do you own that business with her?

A. My name is on it right now, but I haven't been there in

the last -- I am unemployed right now. She owns it.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 44 of 130 PageID #:2572
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:38:25

10:38:29

10:38:33

10:38:36

10:38:42

10:38:42

10:38:50

10:38:54

10:39:00

10:39:07

10:39:11

10:39:12

10:39:16

10:39:18

10:39:21

10:39:24

10:39:27

10:39:29

10:39:31

10:39:34

10:39:35

10:39:36

10:39:39

10:39:42

10:39:51

45

Q. And when did you stop working for the music store?

A. I am there just to help her out, but I don't have a

paycheck or anything.

Q. When did you last earn income from the music store, you,

yourself?

A. About two and a half years ago, about two years ago.

Q. And your children, what do they do for a living?

A. One is a bouncer, one is a school teacher, and one works

in a medical office.

Q. The one who works in a medical office, what do they do

there?

A. I don't know. I don't.

Q. Is she a physician?

A. No, no.

Q. All right.

Where would you say you get your news from, if you

follow the news?

A. The Internet. TV.

Q. Are there any particular TV stations that you watch more

than others?

A. Not really, no.

Q. And how about Internet news sites? Is there any one in

particular that you get your news from?

A. I just search the web sometimes.

THE COURT: Thank you.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 45 of 130 PageID #:2573
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:39:51

10:39:51

10:39:52

10:39:52

10:39:56

10:40:03

10:40:05

10:40:08

10:40:13

10:40:17

10:40:21

10:40:25

10:40:29

10:40:34

10:40:37

10:40:40

10:40:44

10:40:54

10:40:55

10:41:00

10:41:03

10:41:07

10:41:08

10:41:12

10:41:15

46

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Mr. Zaatar?

A. I live in Orland Hills. I have lived there for 10 or 15

years.

I have a Bachelor's and Master's degree in Civil

Engineering. I have lived in the near southside of Chicago

while at college at Illinois Institute of Technology. I

currently work for a small engineering firm on Van Buren and

Wells, it is called, E.J.M. Engineering. I have been there

for four years. Before that I worked as an intern for another

local engineering firm called H.D.R. engineering. And also

for a furniture company throughout college delivering

mattresses.

I am not married. I currently live at home in Orland

Hills with my parents. No children. I like to travel, that

is my hobby.

Q. Let me ask you, you told us about your engineering firm

work, and then you were an intern at some point as well.

Does that take us back to your -- to you getting your

Master's degree?

A. I completed my Master's degree in 2011. I was working

full time for the last four years. Before that I was an

intern part time, and also working at a furniture company.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 46 of 130 PageID #:2574
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:41:15

10:41:26

10:41:28

10:41:36

10:41:40

10:41:56

10:41:56

10:41:56

10:41:56

10:41:58

10:41:58

10:42:02

10:42:15

10:42:16

10:42:19

10:42:21

10:42:22

10:42:25

10:42:28

10:42:32

10:42:34

10:42:51

10:42:52

10:42:55

10:42:58

47

Q. Okay.

Do your parents own or rent in Orland Hills?

A. They own.

Q. Where would you say you get your news from?

A. CNN or progressive talk radio.

THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Ms. Gabb?

A. I live in Chicago for over 20 years. I am a housewife. I

didn't graduate because --

Q. Ms. Gabb, if you can keep your voice up or hold the

microphone a bit closer.

A. Okay.

Well, I went to 8th grade but I didn't graduate

because of a death in the family, my mother. There were ten

of us and I had to take care of four of them.

Q. All right.

A. I am a housewife. Been married. And you know, that is

about it.

Q. Let me follow up on a few things then.

What does your husband do for a living?

A. He is retired.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 47 of 130 PageID #:2575
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:42:59

10:43:01

10:43:03

10:43:03

10:43:07

10:43:11

10:43:11

10:43:12

10:43:16

10:43:19

10:43:20

10:43:26

10:43:27

10:43:28

10:43:29

10:43:30

10:43:31

10:43:33

10:43:37

10:43:41

10:43:45

10:43:47

10:43:48

10:43:51

10:43:59

48

Q. What did he do before he retired?

A. He was doing maintenance.

Q. Maintenance?

A. Uh-huh.

Q. Did he work for a maintenance company or a government or

--

A. No.

A maintenance company.

Q. Do you and your husband own the home you are living in?

A. No.

Q. Do you have any children?

A. Yes, they are grown.

Q. Can you --

A. Three.

Q. Three kids, okay.

A. Uh-huh.

Q. What do they do for a living?

A. One of them, she works for the post office, my oldest, you

know. And the other ones, they are kids, you know, they are

still young, and they stay with me and my husband.

Q. So your eldest works for the post office?

A. Yes.

Q. And what does he or she do for the post office?

A. She is -- you know how you ship -- put the mail out, you

know, so it can get to your house.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 48 of 130 PageID #:2576
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:44:02

10:44:04

10:44:05

10:44:08

10:44:11

10:44:16

10:44:20

10:44:25

10:44:27

10:44:29

10:44:32

10:44:41

10:44:41

10:44:46

10:44:51

10:44:55

10:45:02

10:45:12

10:45:15

10:45:20

49

Q. So she is sorting the mail?

A. Uh-huh, yes.

Q. And your two other children, how old?

A. The baby girl is 24, and Michelle is 32.

Q. And your 24 year old, what does she do for a living?

A. She is trying to go back to school, but she just had --

this will make her fifth child. They are still young.

Q. And how about the 32 year old?

A. She has got one.

Q. Does the 32 year old work outside the home?

A. No. Lazy. No.

Q. All right.

What do you like to do in your free time?

A. Get away from everything, really. You know, piece of

mind, because I have -- I am still at home and my grandkids

they stay with me, and I am helping at home.

THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Veronica Ragoza.

A. I live in the west side of Chicago, 11 years. I work for

Chase Bank at the Citadel Building next door. I am not

married. I have one child, four years old. I like listening

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 49 of 130 PageID #:2577
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:45:33

10:45:36

10:45:40

10:45:44

10:45:47

10:45:48

10:45:50

10:45:51

10:45:52

10:45:54

10:45:59

10:46:00

10:46:04

10:46:09

10:46:13

10:46:23

10:46:26

10:46:27

10:46:29

10:46:34

10:46:37

10:46:38

10:46:43

10:46:44

10:46:48

50

to music, using the Internet. I get my news basically from

the Internet. And programs that I like to watch is just like

soap operas.

Q. Do you rent or own on the west side?

A. I live with my parents.

Q. Do they rent or own?

A. Yes, they own.

Q. They own.

How far did you get in school?

A. School, about a half -- like 20 minutes from my house.

Q. I'm sorry.

How far did you get in schooling, in your education?

A. Oh, degrees? I have a degree in criminal justice,

Associate's degree, and then I had a change in career and I

got a certificate in medical billing and coding.

Q. What are your job duties with -- is it Chase?

A. Yes, Chase Bank.

I work in the accounts receivable department, which

is basically processing checks and payments, you know, that

people make.

Q. Okay.

And what news web sites do you frequent?

A. Say it again?

Q. What are the web sites where you get your news from?

A. Just basically like Yahoo, Yahoo headlines.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 50 of 130 PageID #:2578
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:47:00

10:47:03

10:47:04

10:47:05

10:47:17

10:47:20

10:47:25

10:47:25

10:47:25

10:47:25

10:47:25

10:47:28

10:47:28

10:47:33

10:47:37

10:47:43

10:47:48

10:47:51

10:47:54

10:47:57

10:48:01

10:48:04

10:48:14

10:48:19

10:48:28

51

Q. And let me ask you, are your parents still working?

A. My dad is working.

Q. And what does he do?

A. He is a machine operator.

THE COURT: Thank you.

And let me ask each of you to introduce yourself as I

am sure I am massacring your last names.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Go ahead.

A. My name is Daniel Perlin. I live in Logan Square. I have

lived there for about six years. I have a Bachelor's Degree

in Mechanical Engineering. I used to work for a company

called Kellogg, Brown & Root in Chicago, but their office

closed about a month ago. I am actually unemployed now.

Before that I worked in the suburbs for a company

called Ampitech, and prior to that for a company in Chicago

called Sargent and Lundy. They are all engineering firms

specializing in power, oil, and gas.

I am not married. I rent. I live with my

girlfriend. And let's see, my hobbies are music, cars,

aviation, travel.

Q. Where do you get your news from?

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 51 of 130 PageID #:2579
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:48:30

10:48:36

10:48:45

10:48:48

10:48:49

10:48:51

10:48:59

10:49:00

10:49:00

10:49:02

10:49:03

10:49:05

10:49:08

10:49:11

10:49:12

10:49:14

10:49:15

10:49:22

10:49:26

10:49:28

10:49:30

10:49:37

10:49:40

10:49:41

10:49:43

52

A. Mainly from NPR, Chicago affiliate, The Economist,

Atlantic, Slate.

Q. Are there any television programs that you watch

regularly?

A. I really like Seinfeld.

Q. Seinfeld? Okay. It is in syndication, at least have you

that.

A. Yes.

Q. How long did you work for Kellog, Brown & Root before

their office closed?

A. About a year and a half.

Q. And the other two engineering firms that you mentioned,

does that take us all the way back to you getting your

degree?

A. Yes.

Q. And how many years back is that?

A. It is about seven years.

Q. What does your girlfriend do for a living, if anything?

A. She is an actor.

Q. Would we have seen her in anything?

A. She was in a few shows with the Organic Theater Company at

the Greenhouse Theater and then profiles theater up on the

northside.

Q. Okay. Thank you.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 52 of 130 PageID #:2580
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:49:43

10:49:43

10:49:46

10:49:47

10:49:48

10:49:51

10:49:58

10:50:02

10:50:08

10:50:18

10:50:21

10:50:21

10:50:26

10:50:29

10:50:30

10:50:36

10:50:40

10:50:40

10:50:46

10:50:52

10:50:54

10:51:03

10:51:06

53

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Ms. Bialy?

A. My name is Karen Bialy. I live in Brookfield, Illinois.

I own my home. I went to Triton and received a surgical tech

-- it is not a degree, a certificate. I work at Berwyn

Radiation. I live alone. I have two kids. They are 28 and

25. And I like to travel.

Q. Ms. Bialy, you did finish high school?

A. Yes.

Q. How long have you worked for Berwyn Radiation?

A. Probably about 11 years.

Q. What are your job duties?

A. Secretary and I assist with the doctor.

Q. Can you tell us what your two children do for a living, if

anything?

A. One is a supervisor at UPS and the other is IT at a

dental, like, corporation.

Q. So where do you get your news from?

A. On the internet, CNN or like the Chicago Tribune.

Q. Any television program that you watch regularly?

A. Not really.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 53 of 130 PageID #:2581
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:51:17

10:51:18

10:51:22

10:51:25

10:51:25

10:51:30

10:51:33

10:51:37

10:51:40

10:51:40

10:51:45

10:51:52

10:51:57

10:52:02

10:52:06

10:52:11

10:52:11

10:52:17

10:52:20

10:52:23

10:52:26

10:52:27

54

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Ms. Heraty?

A. My name is Celine Heraty. I live in Western Springs. I

have lived there about a year. I lived in LaGrange prior to

that.

I have -- I went through high school and I have one

year of community college.

I am currently employed as a realtor for Coldwell

Banker in LaGrange. I have been a realtor there for 24

years.

I am divorced but I have three daughters, Jessica is

26, Rebecca is 24, and my youngest, Julia, is 21. Jessica

works in the City here, she works for a company that provides

continuing education for health care professionals. Rebecca

works as a paralegal for a law firm in Hinsdale. And my

youngest works with me at Coldwell Banker.

Q. Okay.

A. I get my news from local TV channels, I usually watch both

the 5:00 o'clock and 10:00 o'clock news.

What else do you need to know?

Q. So before moving to Western Springs, how long did you live

in LaGrange?

A. I lived in LaGrange for 20 years.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 54 of 130 PageID #:2582
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:52:32

10:52:35

10:52:36

10:52:38

10:52:43

10:52:45

10:52:47

10:52:52

10:52:52

10:52:57

10:53:02

10:53:05

10:53:07

10:53:10

10:53:11

10:53:26

10:53:33

10:53:34

10:53:42

10:53:47

10:53:51

10:53:58

10:54:02

10:54:04

10:54:08

55

Q. And in Western Springs, do you own or rent that home?

A. I rent currently.

Q. How about in Western Springs, did you rent or own?

A. I owned.

Q. May I ask when you got divorced?

A. I got divorced a year ago.

Q. And if I could further ask, what did your husband do for a

living?

A. He was a commodities trader at the Chicago Mercantile

Exchange, and then moved over to the Board of Trade.

Q. And I think it is your middle daughter --

A. Rebecca.

Q. (Continuing) -- the firm that she works at, do you know

what type of law they practice?

A. They practice real estate law, and also personal injury.

Q. Do you have occasion to talk much about her work?

A. Yes, occasionally.

Q. And did she, in discussing her work, talk about the legal

rulings or is it focused on other things?

A. Basically she consults me on legal matters, things she is

not clear on that I can possibly help her with.

Q. And then the local TV news channels, are there one or a

few you prefer over the others?

A. 5 or 7, the local channels.

Q. And are there any television programs that you watch

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 55 of 130 PageID #:2583
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:54:13

10:54:14

10:54:22

10:54:37

10:54:37

10:54:37

10:54:37

10:54:37

10:54:43

10:54:43

10:54:47

10:54:51

10:54:57

10:55:01

10:55:06

10:55:18

10:55:22

10:55:28

10:55:32

10:55:34

10:55:39

10:55:42

10:55:42

10:55:47

10:55:49

56

regularly?

A. I like to watch the Game of Thrones, the series, Breaking

Bad, my daughters have gotten me into those series.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Next?

A. My name is Shaun Walsted. I have lived in Bartlett for

four years. Before that I lived in Elgin.

I graduated high school and did one year of college.

I worked for Hoffer Plastics for 16 years in building

maintenance. I am married. My wife works for Gallagher

Bassett, senior claims rep. No kids. I like sports. I kind

of watch a little bit of everything, comedies more. I watch

CBS for about five minutes in the mornings then after that it

is WBBM radio.

Q. And do you rent or own in Bartlett?

A. Own.

Q. And how long did you live in Elgin before you moved to

Bartlett?

A. 30 years.

Q. Are you currently working now?

A. Yes.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 56 of 130 PageID #:2584
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:55:54

10:55:57

10:55:58

10:56:03

10:56:08

10:56:12

10:56:18

10:56:19

10:56:25

10:56:25

10:56:38

10:56:39

10:56:41

10:56:49

10:57:02

10:57:07

10:57:12

10:57:16

10:57:20

10:57:24

57

Q. And your wife works for an insurance company as an

insurance representative?

A. I guess you would call it an insurance company. I don't

know too much about it, but I know it is through -- GB works

for United Airlines, so if someone gets hurt there, like the

ramp guys, they file their claims and she takes care of the

paperwork or some sort.

Q. So it might be like worker's compensation type claims?

A. Yes, yes.

Q. How long has she been in that job.

A. Seven years.

Q. Do you know where she worked before then?

A. I know she worked a little bit at McDonald's.

Q. Okay. Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. All right.

A. Hi. My name is Gloria Arestis. I live in Orland Park,

Illinois. I currently now, my husband and I, own a business.

It is a restaurant. We have had it for 15 years. But by

profession I am a registered nurse. I still hold my license,

but truly work only with our business, it is located in

Evergreen Park, Illinois, and is a pancake house.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 57 of 130 PageID #:2585
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:57:27

10:57:32

10:57:37

10:57:43

10:57:45

10:57:52

10:57:56

10:58:01

10:58:07

10:58:11

10:58:15

10:58:20

10:58:27

10:58:31

10:58:34

10:58:38

10:58:41

10:58:48

10:58:53

10:58:59

10:59:03

10:59:13

10:59:16

10:59:20

10:59:22

58

I have two children, a son who is 25, he works for

us. He does hold a Bachelor's Degree in Law Enforcement,

Justice Administration, and is in the process of trying to get

jobs in that profession.

My daughter, she is 24 years old, she holds a

Bachelor's in Nursing, she is a Registered Nurse, she is

currently working on her Master's at Benedictine University.

She is a full time RN at Advocate Children's Hospital in Oak

Lawn, Illinois. She is a pediatric intensive care nurse and

also is trained for the neonatal intensive care nurse.

I left nursing 14 and a half years ago. It was a

family decision to see if we could make a go of the business,

which we did. We were able to send our children to college.

We do own our home. We have been there for ten and a half

years.

What I like to do? Go home and relax, whether it is

music, whether it is enjoying the yard now in the summer. I

do watch Lifetime Movie Network, a lot of it has true stories.

I love Criminal Minds. I love Law and Order, Special Victims.

And sometimes I sit down with my daughter and watch some MTV

shows.

THE COURT: Let me ask you whether -- has your son

ever applied to be with the Federal Bureau of Investigation?

A. No.

Q. And do you know whether he has any -- does he have any

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 58 of 130 PageID #:2586
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10:59:26

10:59:30

10:59:32

10:59:36

10:59:40

10:59:53

10:59:57

11:00:01

11:00:05

11:00:06

11:00:07

11:00:15

11:00:20

11:00:21

11:00:26

11:00:31

11:00:35

11:00:39

11:00:41

11:00:44

11:00:51

11:00:55

11:00:56

11:00:57

11:00:58

59

pending applications to any law enforcement agency?

A. He does have some out now, yes.

Q. And are they -- do you know whether they are with cities

and villages or are any with the Federal Government?

A. No federal, it would be municipal.

Q. Would the fact that he is applying to local law

enforcement agencies make it difficult for you to judge the

credibility of law enforcement officers?

A. Myself?

Q. Right?

A. I don't -- I mean, I am not in that profession, and no, I

don't -- as a matter of fact, I have a high respect for law

enforcement officers.

Q. Well, what is important is that you understand and can

follow an instruction that you must evaluate the testimony of

law enforcement witnesses the same way you would evaluate the

testimony of anyone else who is not working in law

enforcement.

So would you be able to follow an instruction that

you have to evaluate the credibility of a law enforcement

officer like any other witness?

A. Correct, yes.

Q. You can do that?

A. Yes, I can.

You mean without being biassed or have any type of

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 59 of 130 PageID #:2587
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:01:03

11:01:07

11:01:07

11:01:08

11:01:12

11:01:15

11:01:19

11:01:23

11:01:24

11:01:28

11:01:29

11:01:30

11:01:34

11:01:34

11:01:36

11:01:43

11:01:43

11:01:43

11:01:43

11:01:47

11:01:48

11:01:48

11:01:52

11:01:56

11:02:01

60

animosity, you know, how some people have towards certain

professions?

Q. Right.

I mean, there is that part of it, but there is also

-- I do want to make sure that you and every one else

understands that you can't give extra weight to a law

enforcement officer simply because he or she is a law

enforcement officer.

A. Right, right. Because you mean that they hold the title?

Q. That is correct.

A. Right, no.

Q. So they don't start out with either a plus or minus for

you?

A. Exactly, right, right.

Q. Okay.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Next?

A. My name is Alicia Roby. I live in Aurora. I have a

degree in Business Administration, a Bachelor's in Business

Administration and Business Marketing.

My current employee is Tom and Eddie's. I am a

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 60 of 130 PageID #:2588
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:02:04

11:02:10

11:02:17

11:02:22

11:02:27

11:02:32

11:02:37

11:02:45

11:02:48

11:02:51

11:02:52

11:02:55

11:03:02

11:03:10

11:03:12

11:03:15

11:03:16

11:03:17

11:03:18

11:03:20

11:03:31

11:03:34

11:03:37

11:03:38

11:03:42

61

general manager of a restaurant. Basically I guess my duties

are overseeing my floor managers and cooks and hostesses and

servers of an entire -- of one restaurant.

I am married. My husband right now works as a

contract trainer for a medical equipment company. He used to

work for Meijer's as a manager. And then before that he was a

trainer in the Air Force.

We currently do not have any children. Hobbies?

When I have time from working just relaxing and watching

television, I guess.

Q. Are there certain programs you watch regularly?

A. A little bit of reality television, a little bit of drama

television, comedy.

Q. Any of the legal programs?

A. Not in a real long time. Not currently.

Q. Okay.

Do you rent or own in Aurora?

A. We rent.

Q. How long have you lived in Aurora?

A. Gosh, probably 11 years.

Q. And how long have you been general manager of the

restaurant?

A. A little over two years.

Q. And where, if anywhere, did you work before that?

A. I used to work at Schweppes for seven years, it is a

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 61 of 130 PageID #:2589
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:03:47

11:03:49

11:03:51

11:03:56

11:04:03

11:04:13

11:04:14

11:04:17

11:04:17

11:04:21

11:04:24

11:04:37

11:04:39

11:04:40

11:04:41

11:04:42

11:04:47

11:04:56

11:04:56

11:04:56

11:04:56

11:04:58

11:04:58

11:04:59

11:05:04

62

restaurant distribution company.

Q. And what did you do for them?

A. I was a customer service rep. I did accounting. I helped

put together bids for contracting, like kitchen equipment,

stuff like that.

Q. Okay.

Can you tell us a little bit more of your husband's

work? He is a contract trainer for a medical equipment

company?

A. Yes. He goes out to hospitals and, as far as I know,

trains nurses on how to use a certain machine.

Q. Where do you get your news from?

A. I guess from television.

Q. I'm sorry?

A. News stations, television.

Q. Which stations if any do you prefer over the others?

A. 7, I guess.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is Alvin Hayashi, H-a-y-a-s-h-i. I live in the

Ravenswood area in Chicago. I rent an apartment. I have for

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 62 of 130 PageID #:2590
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:05:08

11:05:08

11:05:14

11:05:15

11:05:19

11:05:20

11:05:25

11:05:29

11:05:33

11:05:37

11:05:41

11:05:48

11:05:54

11:06:04

11:06:09

11:06:13

11:06:18

11:06:18

11:06:22

11:06:23

11:06:28

11:06:37

11:06:39

11:06:41

11:06:45

63

about 25 years. I have Bachelor of Art, Photography, Film.

Q. I'm sorry.

In photography and film?

A. Photography,film, emphasize photography.

Q. Okay.

A. And until I got laid off through a work force reduction I

worked at Loyola University Medical Center as a medical

documentary photographer. And before that, I worked at the

University of Illinois Medical Center as a dark room worker

and a photographer. At Loyola I did a lot initially of

clinical photography. Then when Loyola wanted to market their

services, I worked as a PR documentary photographer.

I am single, let's see, no children, obviously. And

I like to watch sports on TV. I get my news from CNN, New

York Times web site. I usually watch Channel 7 for my news on

occasion. I get the Chicago Tribune.

THE COURT: How long did you work for Loyola before

--

A. Almost 32 years.

Q. And when was the reduction in force?

A. I was affected May of 2009.

Q. Have you worked since then?

A. No.

For the first year after I was let go I tried to get

a couple of jobs, went on unemployment, and after my

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 63 of 130 PageID #:2591
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:06:49

11:06:58

11:07:01

11:07:08

11:07:09

11:07:09

11:07:09

11:07:09

11:07:13

11:07:14

11:07:14

11:07:17

11:07:20

11:07:24

11:07:29

11:07:34

11:07:38

11:07:42

11:07:47

11:07:50

11:07:55

11:08:00

11:08:07

11:08:13

11:08:16

64

unemployment ran out, I used some IRA's that a financial

planner had set up for me, and then when I became eligible, I

applied for early Social Security.

THE COURT: All right.

Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is William Fasciana. I have lived in Oak Lawn,

Illinois, since 1981. We own our home, my wife and myself. I

have a Degree in History from UIC, and then on to law school,

a J.D. Degree from John Marshal in 1981.

Since then I have had a pretty extensive practice in

civil litigation, no criminal. About a year or so ago I went

in with my wife, who is also an attorney, to be partners with

her on a medical malpractice defense practice called Serravino

(phonetic) and Fasciana. I am the trial attorney. I have had

many trials, including two in this building. We have a

daughter, 12 years old, who is a student, of course. Major

hobbies would be travel, reading, like to listen to the Travel

Channel. Fox News. We get our news from Channel 5 and from

the New York Times, which we get on Sunday. And real clear

politics, which is a web site.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 64 of 130 PageID #:2592
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:08:23

11:08:26

11:08:27

11:08:29

11:08:29

11:08:31

11:08:34

11:08:36

11:08:52

11:08:52

11:08:52

11:08:52

11:08:52

11:08:56

11:09:00

11:09:03

11:09:05

11:09:05

11:09:05

11:09:22

11:09:22

11:09:25

11:09:29

11:09:31

11:09:34

65

Q. And so you have been doing med/mal defense for the last

eight years?

A. Thereabouts, yes, right.

Q. Okay.

A. Before that it was much more general.

Q. Before that it was a general practice?

Was it a firm or solely?

A. I was a solo practitioner at that point.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. And actually, Ms. Adamovich, based on your scheduling

questionnaire we would like to talk to you at a side bar. We

would like to talk to you down here.

If the lawyers could join me on a side bar, please?

(Whereupon the following sidebar was had in open

court outside the hearing of the rest of the voir

dire panel:)

THE COURT: If you could step over here. This is our

magic microphone. If you speak towards that microphone, our

court reporter is sitting 15 feet from us, and she can

actually still hear us.

A. Okay.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 65 of 130 PageID #:2593
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:09:34

11:09:38

11:09:41

11:09:45

11:09:49

11:09:53

11:09:57

11:10:01

11:10:05

11:10:09

11:10:12

11:10:16

11:10:21

11:10:25

11:10:27

11:10:35

11:10:36

11:10:37

11:10:41

11:10:44

11:10:49

11:10:58

11:11:07

11:11:11

11:11:15

66

Q. Can you tell us about the scheduling issue that you have?

A. My husband is a firefighter/paramedic, so he is 24 hours

on, 48 off, and so that leaves two days a week where he is not

home in the mornings. My kids go to private school in Aurora.

They are on the opposite side. They don't have bus service

because I am on the wrong side. So I am responsible for

taking them to and from school. My mom left her house in St.

Charles at 5:30 to help me get them to school on time because

my husband is on shift. And so this whole two week thing is

cumbersome.

THE COURT: If I may ask, your husband, you said, has

two days a week he can't be there, or -- or two out of three

days. He is only home one morning every third day.

Q. Every third day, okay.

So do you -- do you know whether that -- what his

schedule is upcoming?

A. Yes.

Q. What are the days he is not available?

A. Is he not available today, he is home tomorrow to be

available, and then -- it is all on my phone, Wednesday and

Thursday he would not be home, Friday he would be home. It is

a fun schedule to keep track of.

Q. Your mother came from St. Charles, how far is that?

A. About 40 minutes from St. Charles to Aurora.

Q. So are there no other -- are there any parents nearby,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 66 of 130 PageID #:2594
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:11:23

11:11:24

11:11:28

11:11:31

11:11:35

11:11:37

11:11:41

11:11:45

11:11:46

11:11:49

11:11:51

11:11:53

11:11:56

11:11:57

11:11:57

11:11:58

11:11:59

11:12:02

11:12:02

11:12:02

11:12:05

11:12:05

11:12:07

11:12:09

11:12:09

67

like classmates, or --

A. My mom is -- no. We are seriously on the east side of

Aurora, and the school is on the far west side, most people

are from Aurora, north Aurora, are on the west side.

Q. So your mother is the only person --

A. My mother-in-law works, so she lives closer, but she works

and can't get them to school five days a week. My mom is

retired.

Q. And obviously school started today then or --

A. They started Wednesday of last week.

Q. Last week, okay.

THE COURT: Any follow-up questions from the

government?

MS. MCSHAIN: No.

THE COURT: Defense?

MR. FRANKEL: No, Judge.

THE COURT: You can have a seat. Why don't you all

stay here.

(Whereupon the following sidebar was had in open

court outside the hearing of the entire voir dire

panel:)

THE COURT: Any objection to excusing her?

MS. MCSHAIN: No, your Honor, not from the

government.

MR. FRANKEL: No.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 67 of 130 PageID #:2595
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:12:09

11:12:10

11:12:14

11:12:39

11:12:43

11:12:43

11:12:47

11:12:50

11:12:52

11:12:53

11:12:55

11:12:56

11:12:56

11:13:00

11:13:07

11:13:09

11:13:13

11:13:16

68

THE COURT: Okay.

We might as well call over Mr. Hodge, I think he is

the other one.

Can I also see Mr. Hodge?

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Mr. Hodge, if you can join us as well, please?

(Whereupon the following sidebar was had in open

court outside the hearing of the rest of the voir

dire panel:)

Q. How are you doing? If you can step up here, a little bit

closer, this is a microphone, and if you can talk into that

our court reporter can actually hear you.

A. Okay.

Q. I think you had put something in your scheduling

questionaire?

A. Yes.

Q. Can you go ahead and describe to us what the conflict is?

A. Well, I am a coach and I take care of kids, and I have to

pick them up at a certain time of day.

I just started this a couple weeks ago.

Q. Is this for a school district?

A. It has got to do with a school district and it is sports.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 68 of 130 PageID #:2596
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:13:20

11:13:21

11:13:24

11:13:29

11:13:30

11:13:30

11:13:32

11:13:34

11:13:35

11:13:39

11:13:41

11:13:44

11:13:48

11:13:50

11:13:54

11:14:01

11:14:05

11:14:09

11:14:12

11:14:17

11:14:18

11:14:20

11:14:22

11:14:25

11:14:27

69

Q. I'm sorry?

A. A school district and it is sports and trying to keep them

off the street and do certain stuff, because they have no dad

in their life.

Q. I see.

Is this here in the City?

A. No, I live in Zion.

Q. In Zion, okay.

So what time are you responsible for getting them to

-- you have to get them to school?

A. I have to get them to school sometimes, and then to the

sports center after that in the evening time, pick them up.

Q. What is the pickup time?

A. From school, about 7:00 o'clock in the daytime, sometimes

earlier than that, and evening time, about 3:30.

Q. Do you have coworkers who could fill in for you?

A. I tried that, no.

Q. I am just trying to make it clear for the record.

Are you employed by a school district or by some

not-for-profit organization?

A. No, I work for the government.

Q. For the Zion School District?

A. No, no. I don't work for the school district.

Q. Which government agency do you work for?

A. Navy, DOD.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 69 of 130 PageID #:2597
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:14:29

11:14:32

11:14:35

11:14:39

11:14:45

11:14:46

11:14:49

11:14:50

11:14:51

11:14:51

11:14:51

11:14:51

11:14:51

11:14:56

11:14:58

11:15:00

11:15:03

11:15:12

11:15:16

11:15:17

11:15:23

11:15:27

11:15:31

11:15:35

11:15:41

70

Q. Is this -- oh, okay.

Is this actual employment or volunteer work?

A. Volunteer work, just to keep the young men off the street,

because all of them had did something bad earlier, and so

trying to straighten them out.

THE COURT: Follow-up questions from the government?

MS. MCSHAIN: No, your Honor.

THE COURT: Defense?

MR. FRANKEL: No.

THE COURT: Please have a seat.

(Whereupon the following sidebar was had in open

court outside the hearing of the entire voir dire

panel:)

THE COURT: Any objection to excusing Mr. Hodge?

MS. MCSHAIN: Not from the government.

THE COURT: Mr. Frankel?

MR. FRANKEL: He said that he volunteers with a group

of kids that he needs to get to school and then get them

sporting events after school.

THE COURT: No, I think the reference to sports was

some sports activities that they engage in at the school, so

he has got responsibilities both in the morning at 7:00

o'clock so that they actually get to school, and then at 3:30

he picks them up. It sounds like a different version of like

Chicago Safe Passage, just to get children off the streets and

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 70 of 130 PageID #:2598
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:15:46

11:15:57

11:15:59

11:16:04

11:16:11

11:16:21

11:16:26

11:16:31

11:16:32

11:16:35

11:16:40

11:16:44

11:16:50

11:16:54

11:16:59

11:17:03

11:17:07

11:17:12

11:17:16

11:17:18

11:17:22

11:17:28

11:17:33

11:17:38

11:17:43

71

make sure they get to school and back home after school.

MR. FRANKEL: Judge, I would just ask that he be

seated. We don't have very many African Americans in this

venire, and it doesn't seem like a strong enough conflict. It

is only going to be this week, probably. I don't see that --

I don't see that it is such a strong conflict that it makes

him disqualified. I don't want a juror obviously who doesn't

want to be here, but --

THE COURT: Okay. You have made your record.

So here is the ruling: The ruling is that he --

although this is volunteer work, it is obviously work he feels

is important, and does serve an important role, but just as

important for scheduling purposes, he says that he has tried

to get co-workers or, in this case, co-volunteers to fill in

for him and he was not able to do that, and so I think he does

have a valid excuse. I asked about the times to see if maybe

he would get them to school early enough that he can still

make it in, but Zion is on the Wisconsin border, plus he has

pickup time at 3:30.

And on top of that, while I am sensitive overall to

the representation of all parts of our community, especially

in our jury pool, the people from whom we draw, the Court has

made a recent change to supplement our driver's license list

with voter -- voter registration supplemented now with State

identification and other Secretary of State information. Once

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 71 of 130 PageID #:2599
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:17:46

11:17:56

11:18:00

11:18:03

11:18:09

11:18:10

11:18:15

11:18:19

11:18:24

11:18:28

11:18:31

11:18:34

11:18:39

11:18:43

11:18:46

11:18:51

11:18:55

11:19:02

11:19:06

11:19:06

11:19:22

11:19:23

72

that pool is drawn, I do not intend to rule on for cause

challenges with a view of race. Race has nothing to do with

this case. Even if it did have something to do with this case

in terms of race of any of the parties, that I don't think

would be appropriate.

So, again, I understand, Mr. Frankel, I am sensitive

to making sure we have representation in our jury pool in

general and on the trial jury, but not in a way in which I am

going to let race influence a decision on a for cause

challenge, just as it cannot influence on a peremptory

challenge. So that is the rule.

I think there are two other -- yes, there are

actually several other African Americans in the panel, for

what that is worth, which I actually don't think is worth

much. So I will excuse him as well.

Then I am going to call Juror 25 over, Anwar Akhras,

A-k-h-r-a-s, because he on the way up from the jury department

told the courtroom deputy that he did have a scheduling issue

but it slipped his mind. So we will see what that is if it

slipped his mind. I won't pre-judge it but I will just ask

him to come over here.

If I can also see Mr. Anwar Akhras.

(Whereupon the following sidebar was had in open.

court outside the hearing of the rest of the voir

dire panel:)

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 72 of 130 PageID #:2600
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:19:31

11:19:33

11:19:37

11:19:37

11:19:38

11:19:44

11:19:47

11:19:47

11:19:47

11:19:47

11:19:51

11:19:54

11:19:57

11:19:59

11:20:02

11:20:09

11:20:10

11:20:13

11:20:16

11:20:18

11:20:22

11:20:26

73

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay. Mr. Akhras, step up here to the wall, and if you

speak into the microphone, our court reporter can actually

hear you.

A. Okay.

Q. I understand that you hadn't responded on the scheduling

questionnaire but you informed the courtroom deputy that there

might be a scheduling issue.

Can you tell us what that is?

A. Sure.

I am a third-year medical student at Loyola. I am

supposed to start my surgery service on Wednesday the 4th, and

I thought that is when our orientation was, but our

orientation -- I didn't have access to my email downstairs

until after I submitted the form, but our orientation is on

Tuesday, September 3rd, from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. I don't

know if it is similar to the issue -- what we had for our

third-year orientation, but I am required by law to attend in

order to be accredited in order for the school to allow me to

continue my rotations, so I thought it was something similar

to that for surgery, where if I don't do the orientation for

that one day, I won't be able to attend the eight weeks of

surgery, and I would have to try to find some way of doing it

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 73 of 130 PageID #:2601
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:20:30

11:20:33

11:20:38

11:20:38

11:20:45

11:20:49

11:20:53

11:20:56

11:21:06

11:21:08

11:21:09

11:21:10

11:21:13

11:21:19

11:21:21

11:21:21

11:21:25

11:21:28

11:21:31

11:21:33

11:21:43

11:21:45

11:21:48

11:21:48

11:21:53

74

for my fourth year instead of my -- as part of my electives,

but I am not sure if that is even allowed for me, if I miss

one of my core clerkships if I can move on to my fourth year.

When the jury department contacted me I informed them

I only have two, one-week breaks, it is this week, and one in

March, not a two-week continuous break so that I could come in

and serve during that time. So I didn't know exactly what

dates I would be coming in for, otherwise I would have

inquired about if I could make it up and I wanted to bring it

to your attention.

Q. I appreciate that.

Is that something that if we have to break for jury

service at some point -- I'm sorry, jury selection, is that

something where we could call the med school and find that

out?

A. I might be able to. I don't know if the coordinator is

there today because we are on break this week, but I can try

and call and see if I can get in contact with them.

Q. Okay. What I will ask you to do is -- I am going to keep

going through jury selection but you can step out and try to

make that phone call and see whether that orientation is the

same you had in your second year and you are required to

attend.

But before I let you go, any follow-up questions from

the government?

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 74 of 130 PageID #:2602
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:21:54

11:21:55

11:21:57

11:21:58

11:22:02

11:22:02

11:22:02

11:22:02

11:22:03

11:22:11

11:22:16

11:22:22

11:22:23

11:22:26

11:22:30

11:22:33

11:22:35

11:22:38

11:22:41

11:22:41

11:22:42

11:22:44

11:22:48

11:22:52

11:22:53

75

MS. MCSHAIN: No.

THE COURT: From the defense?

MR. FRANKEL: No.

THE COURT: Okay. You can go ahead and step out and

then take your seat.

(Whereupon the following sidebar was had in open

court outside the hearing of the entire voir

dire panel:)

We will find out what he has to say about that.

I am going to excuse 14, Rachel Adamovich, and 23,

Larry Hodge. And then we will resume with the background

questions.

MR. FRANKEL: There is one juror who expressed

concern about being fair, we are going to have to handle that

at a side bar, I would assume, but not right now.

THE COURT: Let's just keep going.

MR. PERCONTE: Judge, is it the Court's plan to do

the preliminary questions first and then come back to the

other questions?

THE COURT: Yes, yes.

Those additional questions will be, Does anyone have

a yes answer to the following, and some of them will be side

bars and some won't, but we will get the biographicals out of

the way and then the additional questions.

I should mention, if we are getting close I do want

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 75 of 130 PageID #:2603
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:23:00

11:23:03

11:23:07

11:23:10

11:23:13

11:23:19

11:23:21

11:23:22

11:23:23

11:23:24

11:23:25

11:23:28

11:23:33

11:23:34

11:23:36

11:23:38

11:23:44

11:23:47

11:23:55

11:23:57

11:23:59

11:24:01

11:24:05

11:24:09

11:24:13

76

to alert you I had said two alternates, and it doesn't change

the number of peremptory challenges you have, but I may drop

it down to one, since you have now estimated that the trial

will not be as long as perhaps we thought at one time.

So do you have an objection to me dropping it down to

13 possibly?

MR. FRANKEL: No.

MR. WALLIN: No.

MR. PERCONTE: No.

MS. MCSHAIN: No, Judge.

THE COURT: We are short now on jurors downstairs, so

jury selection would have to go into tomorrow if we don't seat

a jury today.

MR. FRANKEL: And while we are here, do you know when

you are going to take a break?

THE COURT: Can you use one right now?

MR. FRANKEL: Yes, but I can wait.

THE COURT: We have got a lot more to go.

MR. FRANKEL: I didn't know if you were going to go

all the way to lunch.

THE COURT: Usually what I do is I try to -- even if

I have to push into the noon hour, I try to finish jury

selection so I can let the others go. It turns out today

though that the jury department needs everyone back no matter

what, so I will probably take a break at noon.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 76 of 130 PageID #:2604
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:24:17

11:24:18

11:24:20

11:24:20

11:24:20

11:24:29

11:24:29

11:24:32

11:24:36

11:24:44

11:24:47

11:24:59

11:25:00

11:25:03

11:25:06

11:25:06

11:25:06

11:25:06

11:24:58

11:24:58

11:25:10

11:25:18

11:25:22

11:25:26

11:25:34

77

Can you wait it out?

MR. FRANKEL: I can wait it out.

THE COURT: Okay.

(Whereupon the sidebar discussion was ended.

and the proceedings continued in open court as

follows:)

THE COURT: Ms. Adamovich and Mr. Hodge, you are

excused. So if you can hand the microphone to the next

person. And Mr. Hodge and Ms. Adamovich, you do have to go to

the second floor to the jury department, don't hop on the el

right now, go to the second floor, please.

We are going to continue now. I am sorry about

the side bars and white noise. This is why they don't show

the jury selection on Law and Order and The Good Wife and so

on.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Mr. Gross?

A. John Gross. I live in Fox Lake, Illinois, for about 7

years now. High school diploma. Employed for about 13 years

at Rental Systems, a property management company. I am a

superintendent there. Basically we do maintenance on -- we

are a property management company and so we rent and sell

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 77 of 130 PageID #:2605
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:25:39

11:25:47

11:25:51

11:25:54

11:25:59

11:26:03

11:26:19

11:26:23

11:26:28

11:26:36

11:26:43

11:26:49

11:26:58

11:26:59

11:27:01

11:27:01

11:27:04

11:27:10

11:27:14

11:27:16

11:27:19

11:27:28

11:27:29

11:27:30

11:27:30

78

commercial property and also build homes. I manage the trades

that come in and do servicing when we get slow and things like

that.

Family. Married, 13 years, Lisa Gross. She has a

son from a previous marriage, he is 31 now. He works at an

Infinity dealer servicing cars. I have no one living at home

right now, me, my wife, and a couple puppies.

Hobbies. Water ski, snow mobile, a lot of walks.

And then any channel, 9 through 2, watch those, and listen to

radio every morning, 720 or 780. Television shows, you know,

I guess really no reality shows or anything of that nature, or

-- I will watch comedies, a lot of movies, and relax.

That is about it.

Q. Does your wife work outside the home?

A. She works for United Food Groups in Elgin.

Q. Okay.

A. I think she is a sales -- purchasing agent there.

Q. How long has she done that?

A. 13 years.

Q. And do you own or rent in Fox Lake?

A. Own, townhome.

THE COURT: All right.

Thank you.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 78 of 130 PageID #:2606
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:27:30

11:27:30

11:27:30

11:27:32

11:27:32

11:27:37

11:27:41

11:27:41

11:27:46

11:27:50

11:27:56

11:28:03

11:28:12

11:28:18

11:28:24

11:28:32

11:28:36

11:28:42

11:28:45

11:28:50

11:28:56

11:28:59

11:29:00

11:29:02

11:29:03

79

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Next?

A. My name is Charlene Jurgovan. I live in Tinley Park. I

have lived there for 14 years, and I own the home with my

husband.

I have got a Bachelor's Degree from Saint Xavier

University. I have not been employed for the past ten years.

My husband is now retired. Before that he worked for LaSalle

Bank and then Bank of America when they took it over.

We have three kids. The oldest is 47, he works at a

car dealer in Missouri. I have a daughter that is 46, she is

a homemaker and she works part time. She freelances for an

educational testing company. And I have a daughter that is

37, and she is a homemaker, she is not employed.

I like to read. I work puzzles. I get -- I have a

subscription to the Chicago Tribune and once in a while I will

watch WGN News. I like to watch Daily Show and Colbert

Report. I watch a lot of HGTV.

Q. Can you tell us what your Bachelor's was in?

A. Pardon?

Q. Your Bachelor's Degree?

A. Elementary education.

Q. Okay.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 79 of 130 PageID #:2607
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:29:06

11:29:09

11:29:12

11:29:16

11:29:19

11:29:28

11:29:28

11:29:28

11:29:28

11:29:32

11:29:32

11:29:35

11:29:41

11:29:45

11:29:46

11:29:50

11:29:55

11:30:03

11:30:11

11:30:15

11:30:17

11:30:24

11:30:30

11:30:33

11:30:34

80

And what did you do before -- you said you haven't

been employed in ten years. What did you do before then?

A. When I first got out of college I taught, then I subbed,

and then I was a homemaker. For two years I worked as a

pharmacy technician part time. That is it.

THE COURT: All right. Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is William Stafford. I live in Wedron,

W-e-d-r-o-n, Illinois, unincorporated town near Ottawa,

LaSalle County.

My wife and I both retired a year and a half ago. We

have a daughter, 38, who works for an orthopedic surgeon. We

have a son, 36, he works for the LaSalle County. We own our

own home. I retired from GE Plastics, I was a technician. We

made plastic pellets. And my wife worked for a credit union

for 37 years.

Our hobbies are fishing, watching grandchildren,

riding motorcycles. Let's see, what else?

Q. Hopefully not at the same time you are watching your

grandchildren?

A. No, no.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 80 of 130 PageID #:2608
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:30:35

11:30:43

11:30:44

11:30:46

11:30:48

11:30:51

11:30:58

11:31:01

11:31:02

11:31:07

11:31:08

11:31:14

11:31:14

11:31:15

11:31:16

11:31:25

11:31:28

11:31:33

11:31:38

11:31:42

11:31:43

11:31:46

11:31:52

11:31:52

11:31:56

81

Q. Okay.

A. I guess that is about it.

Q. How long did you work for GE Plastics?

A. I worked for them for 15 years.

Q. And what did your wife do for the credit union?

A. She was a head teller for about 10 or 12 years, and then

she went into the operations end of it.

Q. How far did you get in school?

A. Two years of college, no degree.

Q. Okay.

And I'm sorry, your 36 year old works for LaSalle

County?

A. Yes.

Q. Do you know in what capacity?

A. He is in environmental health and safety. He does zoning

issues. He is in charge of checking to make sure you are so

far off the road when you build a house or addition, things

like that, environmental disposals.

Q. And how long have you lived in -- is it Wedron?

A. Wedron, yes.

Actually, I grew up there, and I have lived in my

present home for 35 years.

Q. Okay. Great.

Before you hand off the microphone, all the way down

to the bench there, if you can hand it back to Ms. SKWRER

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 81 of 130 PageID #:2609
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:32:01

11:32:01

11:32:01

11:32:01

11:32:01

11:32:04

11:32:05

11:32:08

11:32:12

11:32:16

11:32:19

11:32:19

11:32:22

11:32:29

11:32:31

11:32:33

11:32:34

11:32:45

11:32:45

11:32:45

11:32:47

11:32:47

11:32:47

11:32:49

11:32:53

82

Jurgovan for a moment.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Ms. Jurgovan, I neglected to ask you what your husband

did for LaSalle Bank and Bank of America?

A. Well, he is an attorney, but he worked as a financial

planner.

Q. So a financial planner for clients of the bank?

A. Right.

Q. Not internal to the bank?

A. Clients of the bank.

Q. Did he practice law at some point?

A. No.

Q. Okay. Very good.

Thank you

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. If you could talk loudly, please.

Go ahead.

A. My name is Justin Gierke. I live in Hanover Park. I have

owned a house there for the last two years. Prior to that I

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 82 of 130 PageID #:2610
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:32:57

11:33:00

11:33:06

11:33:09

11:33:10

11:33:14

11:33:23

11:33:24

11:33:29

11:33:33

11:33:36

11:33:42

11:33:52

11:33:54

11:33:55

11:33:59

11:34:02

11:34:02

11:34:03

11:34:05

11:34:12

11:34:14

11:34:17

11:34:21

11:34:21

83

rented an apartment in Elk Grove Village for three years. I

work for a transportation company, Trier Transportation. I am

a customer service manager over there in charge of four other

employees.

I am married. I have two children. A daughter who

is 18, a son who is 5. My wife is a registrar at Alexian

Brothers Hospital.

My hobbies? I mix music and watch television. I get

most of my news from Yahoo and Channel 5.

Q. And what are the programs you regularly watch?

A. Criminal minds, comedies too like Seinfeld, King of

Queens, that is pretty much it.

Q. How long have you been a customer service manager?

A. 10 years.

Q. But your wife is a registered nurse at Alexian --

A. She is a registrar, she just registers the patients that

come in.

Q. I see.

How long has she worked there?

A. About nine years.

Q. How far did you get in school?

A. Graduated high school, no college.

Q. Okay.

THE COURT: Thank you.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 83 of 130 PageID #:2611
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:34:21

11:34:21

11:34:24

11:34:24

11:34:25

11:34:28

11:34:32

11:34:35

11:34:39

11:34:42

11:34:50

11:34:54

11:34:56

11:34:58

11:35:09

11:35:14

11:35:15

11:35:16

11:35:21

11:35:23

11:35:23

11:35:25

11:35:29

11:35:35

11:35:36

84

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is Tom Chester. I live on the north side of

Chicago for the past ten years. I am a renter.

I have a Bachelor's degree in accounting. I have

worked for the last four years for McGladrey, which is an

accounting firm. Prior to that I worked for Merrill Lynch.

I am not married. I live by myself. I enjoy golf.

I get my news from the Internet. And I don't watch a lot of

television.

Q. Any particular web sites that you visit for the news?

A. CNBC, the Wall Street Journal, Yahoo.

Q. And how long did you work for Merrill Lynch before

McGladrey?

A. Three years.

Q. And does that take us back to college?

A. Unfortunately, no.

Q. Okay.

A. I am much older than I look.

Prior to that I worked for another bank in Chicago,

Fifth Third.

Q. How long did you work there?

A. Three years.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 84 of 130 PageID #:2612
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:35:38

11:35:39

11:35:43

11:35:49

11:35:54

11:35:57

11:36:06

11:36:06

11:36:06

11:36:06

11:36:11

11:36:12

11:36:12

11:36:16

11:36:19

11:36:24

11:36:29

11:36:33

11:36:37

11:36:41

11:36:44

11:36:54

11:37:04

11:37:12

11:37:22

85

Q. All of these accounting positions?

A. No, I was a banker and -- I have an accounting degree. I

was a banker, I lent money to businessmen for their companies.

Now I am a consultant with McGladrey.

Q. And what did you do at Merrill Lynch?

A. Commercial banker, a lender.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is Marcie Delarosa. I live in Chicago in the

south loop. We have lived there for three months now. Prior

to that I lived in Printer's row for 13 years. I have a

degree in interior design as well as in history of art and

architecture. I have practiced in the field of interior

design for 25 years and owned my own business for 14 years.

My husband is an art director, freelance, and

advertising.

So I am married, no kids. I get a lot of my news

from NPR and PBS. We watch a lot of WTTW. For print and

news, I read the New Yorker and the reader regularly. And

regular news as well. For hobbies, reading, traveling,

running, cycling, stuff like that.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 85 of 130 PageID #:2613
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:37:25

11:37:28

11:37:28

11:37:43

11:37:50

11:37:52

11:37:55

11:37:55

11:37:58

11:38:07

11:38:07

11:38:10

11:38:12

11:38:23

11:38:24

11:38:24

11:38:24

11:38:31

11:38:31

11:38:32

11:38:35

11:38:39

11:38:44

11:38:50

11:38:50

86

Q. Are there any particular Internet news sites that you go

to?

A. I read Bill Moyer's and I read links from WBEZ's web site.

Sometimes I read Salon and other news, things that friends tip

me off to, stuff like that.

Q. And do you rent or own in the south loop?

A. We own.

Q. Did you also own when you were in Printer's Row?

A. Yes.

Q. So you own an interior design business?

A. Yes.

Q. It is commercial or residential?

A. Commercial, specialty is in restaurant and hotel design.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is Germaine Caprio. I live in Oak Park, Illinois.

I have lived there for 20 years. I live with my husband

there. We own. I went to University of Illinois in Champaign

Urbana, and graduated with a degree in Liberal Arts and

Sciences.

For the past 10 years -- 14 years my husband and I

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 86 of 130 PageID #:2614
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:38:54

11:38:59

11:39:03

11:39:06

11:39:14

11:39:19

11:39:23

11:39:28

11:39:37

11:39:40

11:39:44

11:39:48

11:39:49

11:40:00

11:40:03

11:40:09

11:40:13

11:40:17

11:40:29

11:40:32

11:40:32

11:40:32

11:40:32

11:40:34

11:40:34

87

own our own clothing design company. I own a company, called

Pajamas, we design clothing for women, lounge wear, and my

husband runs with it me. We do that in Oak Park.

I have two children, two girls, high schoolers. I

work out whenever I get free time. I am a big runner,

swimmer, and when I -- I don't have cable, so I don't watch

much TV, but we do listen to NPR, and when I am running I

listen to NPR in the mornings. And that is it.

Q. So you can run listening to NPR?

A. Actually, it is better for me than music, it is more

interesting, and I get tired of the same songs.

Q. Okay.

Before you owned the clothing store, or clothing

design business, did you work before then?

A. I did. I used to sell watches for Seiko Watch. And then

before that I did the windows for Bloomingdale's and

Nordstrom's and Neiman Marcus. I also freelanced doing hair

and makeup in the film industry.

Q. Any television -- you said no cable television, okay.

Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Next?

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 87 of 130 PageID #:2615
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:40:34

11:40:41

11:40:45

11:40:53

11:40:57

11:41:02

11:41:05

11:41:10

11:41:14

11:41:17

11:41:21

11:41:26

11:41:30

11:41:35

11:41:37

11:41:42

11:41:46

11:41:48

11:41:55

11:42:06

11:42:06

11:42:06

11:42:06

11:42:14

11:42:16

88

A. My name is James Broniec. I live in Hainesville,Illinois,

in Lake County. I have owned my home for the last seven

years. I went to Illinois State University. I left a couple

credits shy of graduation to start a consulting company here

in Chicago. My employer is Symantec Corporation and we are

based in Mountain View, California. I worked there three

years. Prior to that I worked for Takeda Pharmaceuticals for

three years in Deerfield. Then a year for Tap Pharmaceutical

Products prior. And before that Baker & McKenzie here in

Chicago. I led their global desk top team and we were

responsible for setting standards. But what I do today, my

title is a Solution Architect, I am sent on-site with

government agencies, companies, school districts, to solve big

technology programs for them.

Prior to Baker & McKenzie, which I started with in

2005, I worked for Thompson Heine, LLP, a law firm based in

Cleveland, Ohio.

I am single. I do not have any children. My major

hobby would probably be I am a semi-professional know 'em and

hold 'em poker player. And that is it.

Q. Say that again?

A. Know 'em and hold 'em poker player.

Q. Okay.

Do you watch television regularly?

A. I don't have cable and I am on the road, but if I were to

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 88 of 130 PageID #:2616
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:42:20

11:42:25

11:42:26

11:42:29

11:42:32

11:42:39

11:42:43

11:42:43

11:42:47

11:42:50

11:42:50

11:42:55

11:43:00

11:43:02

11:43:05

11:43:10

11:43:13

11:43:19

11:43:22

11:43:25

11:43:28

11:43:32

11:43:33

11:43:37

11:43:53

89

watch TV it would be PBS, and I do listen to NPR when I am on

the road.

Q. Is that where you get your news mostly, NPR?

A. Actually Twitter. I probably get more information from

Twitter and Google news, which is more of an aggregate of many

different news sources, trading analysis and different news

stories.

Q. So at both Thompson Heine and Baker & McKenzie you worked

for their technology department?

A. That is correct.

Q. And so -- and did that ever involve preparing cases for

trial and setting up discovery data bases or was it just for

their --

A. We did actually complete and create the rule standard for

the first e-discovery case and for the Federal Standards ediscovery based on some of the work we did in our practice.

I have served as a material witness on the technology

side twice in the court system as an expert witness, but not

other than that, other than the support side of things.

Q. And you served as a witness in civil cases?

A. Correct.

Q. And on the subject of e-discovery?

A. On the subject of e-discovery and technology and security

parameters around technology access.

Q. And at Takeda and Tap you also work in their technology

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 89 of 130 PageID #:2617
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:43:59

11:43:59

11:44:02

11:44:11

11:44:11

11:44:11

11:44:11

11:44:15

11:44:15

11:44:15

11:44:20

11:44:23

11:44:27

11:44:30

11:44:33

11:44:36

11:44:40

11:44:44

11:44:44

11:44:50

11:44:59

11:45:06

11:45:17

11:45:20

11:45:25

90

department?

A. Yes, I was a solution architect for designing and

implementing different systems.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. I am Kristen Caruso. I live in Morton Grove, Illinois. I

live with my parents. They own the house. They are retired.

I have a Bachelor Degree in History and a Master's Degree in

Art Management. I work at Children's Shakespeare Theater in

the fundraising and I work closely with the Board of

Directors. It has been two years I work there. Prior to that

I was with the Joffrey Ballet in similar kind of work. And

before that I was in a consulting firm for not for profit

organizations.

I am not married. I do not have children. I like to

attend theater, read, write, knit. I watch local news,

Chicago Tonight. In terms of TV I watch Homeland, House,

NCIS. I read the Tribune, Sun Times, and Cranes.

Q. Sun Times or New York Times?

A. Both, actually, but yes, the Sun Times.

Q. All right.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 90 of 130 PageID #:2618
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:45:25

11:45:27

11:45:28

11:45:32

11:45:44

11:45:45

11:45:45

11:45:45

11:45:48

11:45:48

11:45:49

11:45:52

11:45:56

11:46:00

11:46:03

11:46:08

11:46:11

11:46:15

11:46:16

11:46:19

11:46:25

11:46:29

11:46:33

11:46:37

11:46:41

91

Now, what did your parents do before they both

retired?

A. My mother was an administrative assistant at a high school

and my father was a machinist.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is Anwar Akhras. I have lived in Harwood Heights

for the past 12 years. I got a Bachelor's in Sciences from

Loyola undergrad and I am currently a third-year medical

student at Loyola School of Medicine. Undergrad, I did work

study as an administrative assistant for the Master's program.

And then I also had a second job during the summer at a

furniture store, Southside of Chicago, nears the Bronzeville

District.

I am currently single. No children, I live with my

parents at the residence in Hardwood Heights. My father owns

his own store at the furniture business, that is his. My

mother is a homemaker. I am one of seven, so she is busier

than him. My brother is a dentist and all the other brothers

and sisters are in undergrad or in high school.

Hobbies, far and few in between, but reading and

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 91 of 130 PageID #:2619
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:46:45

11:46:52

11:46:56

11:46:58

11:47:01

11:47:01

11:47:03

11:47:06

11:47:08

11:47:12

11:47:15

11:47:21

11:47:21

11:47:24

11:47:28

11:47:35

11:47:38

11:47:40

11:47:44

11:47:44

11:47:47

11:47:51

11:47:53

11:47:54

11:47:58

92

television. I get most of my news from on line, either Google

news other other aggregate sites. I don't follow any

particular channel.

Q. Do you have more information on the scheduling issues?

A. Yes.

So I spoke with the coordinator and it is a

requirement that I have to be there on the 3rd.

Q. That is the State law requirement?

A. It is a requirement for me to be able to complete that

rotation, and that rotation is a requirement for me to

graduate with a degree as per the accreditation for medical

schools.

Q. That is the surgical rotation that begins on Wednesday?

A. The rotation begins on the 4th but the orientation is on

the 3rd.

THE COURT: Can I see the lawyers at side bar for a

moment, please?

(Whereupon a sidebar was had outside of the hearing

of the entire voir dire panel.)

All right. So it doesn't sound like a State law

requirement but a Loyola medical requirement.

Any objection to excusing him?

MS. MCSHAIN: No.

Well, it is next week, and I have the concern just if

we don't finish this week.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 92 of 130 PageID #:2620
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:47:59

11:48:03

11:48:08

11:48:11

11:48:15

11:48:17

11:48:21

11:48:23

11:48:24

11:48:26

11:48:40

11:48:40

11:48:43

11:48:43

11:48:43

11:48:43

11:48:45

11:48:47

11:48:51

11:49:06

11:49:06

11:49:06

11:49:06

11:49:08

11:49:09

93

THE COURT: He said the orientation is on the 3rd,

and that is needed for him to keep with his program.

MR. PERCONTE: No objection. Given your comments

that we don't want the jury rushing on Friday, I am worried

that they would, and we don't want him to feel like he would.

MR. FRANKEL: He is going to be paying attention to

the clock the entire time even though I think he would be a

great juror.

THE COURT: Yes. And I am not sure he would be

paying attention to the clock, but he has got to be there on

Tuesday.

So there is no objection to excusing him, and so

okay.

(Whereupon the proceedings continued in open court

in the presence and hearing of the entire voir dire

panel as follows:)

THE COURT: Mr. Akhras, on the chance that you will

be performing surgery on one of us some day, you will be

excused.

THE JUROR: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 93 of 130 PageID #:2621
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:49:09

11:49:12

11:49:16

11:49:19

11:49:24

11:49:29

11:49:33

11:49:37

11:49:43

11:49:48

11:49:55

11:49:59

11:50:07

11:50:11

11:50:16

11:50:19

11:50:23

11:50:30

11:50:34

11:50:39

11:50:50

11:50:53

11:50:56

11:50:57

11:51:05

94

A. My name is Cori Barnes. Currently I live in Yorkville. I

have rented my current home for four years. Prior to that I

owned a home in Yorkville.

I have some college, but no degree. I am currently

employed with Alta Industrial Equipment Company. We service

lift trucks, forklifts, and I am the service dispatcher for 15

road mechanics. I have been there about three years. Prior

to that I was a senior regional account manager for Millennium

Trust Company in Oak Brook working with the sales reps on the

East Coast for IRA's and self-directed retirement accounts.

I am currently divorced for about a year, and my

ex-husband worked -- works for Marklund is Geneva, Illinois.

He is a CNA. He has been there for 14 years.

I have two children, 16 years old and an 11 year old.

And no other adults live in my house.

My hobbies are -- I enjoy singing and listening to

music, reading, scrapbooking. I am a Food Network junky. I

get my news from WSPY in Sandwich because in Montgomery,

Illinois, that is the station we can get in the office I work

in, so I do listen to them. It is a talk radio station.

Q. And did you say that you are working in your current job

as a service dispatcher for three months or three years?

A. Three months.

Q. And then how long were you a regional account manager in

Oak Brook?

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 94 of 130 PageID #:2622
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:51:05

11:51:06

11:51:06

11:51:07

11:51:12

11:51:16

11:51:24

11:51:28

11:51:32

11:51:36

11:51:38

11:51:49

11:51:49

11:51:49

11:51:49

11:51:51

11:51:51

11:51:55

11:51:59

11:52:02

11:52:06

11:52:11

11:52:15

11:52:18

11:52:22

95

A. Six years.

Q. Did you work before that?

A. Yes.

Prior to that I was an administrative assistant. I

worked for a company called Michaelson & Messinger. They

were -- they did insurance adjustments, but it was home,

specializing in fires, fire loss, and doing the inventory

after the loss, and helping with the insurance claims, and

then helping rebuild the homes.

Q. And how long did you work there?

A. Seven years.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is Sandra Bottoms. My husband and I own our own

homes where we have lived for the past seven years in Aurora.

I have a Bachelor's degree in American Studies. I

was a financial aid counselor with Waubonsee Community College

for about eight years. Then I took an early retirement. Five

years ago I took a part-time position with the Kane County Bar

Association, where I work now.

My husband's career has been in distribution and

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 95 of 130 PageID #:2623
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:52:26

11:52:34

11:52:38

11:52:43

11:52:50

11:52:56

11:53:00

11:53:05

11:53:09

11:53:12

11:53:15

11:53:19

11:53:24

11:53:27

11:53:31

11:53:40

11:53:40

11:53:40

11:53:40

11:53:45

11:53:45

11:53:47

11:53:49

11:53:52

11:53:55

96

logistics. He is retired. His last employer was Magnet Glove

and Safety Equipment. I have four daughters and a son. My

daughter, Susan, is not employed. My daughter, Sharon, is a

registered nurse. Julia is a graphic designer. Bethany is a

children's librarian. And my son is a trucker. And then I

have a 21 year old granddaughter who is living in our home as

she tries to figure out what to do with her life.

I like to read, I like to garden, I -- my life is

pretty much focused on my family.

My primary news source would be the News Hour on

Channel 11. I also read the Chicago Tribune and the Aurora

Beacon on a daily basis.

Q. What do you do for the Kane County Bar Association?

A. Just a part-time administrative assistant. It was

something to get me out of babysitting.

THE COURT: Thank you.

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. I am Mark Roberts. I live in Chicago in the Lakeview

neighborhood with my wife of four years and my son of six

months. No one else lives in our house.

Schooling, I have a high school diploma, bachelor

degree, master degree, and a doctor of medicine, M.D. degree.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 96 of 130 PageID #:2624
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:53:59

11:54:02

11:54:06

11:54:11

11:54:16

11:54:17

11:54:21

11:54:24

11:54:27

11:54:30

11:54:30

11:54:30

11:54:30

11:54:42

11:54:44

11:54:46

11:54:49

11:54:49

11:54:49

11:54:51

11:54:51

11:54:51

11:54:56

11:55:00

11:55:03

97

Currently I am an attending physician in the Department of

Pathology. I am an anatomical and clinical physician/ I

specialize in the diagnosis of blood disorders, leukemia and

lymphoma. I am not a forensic pathologist nor do I practice

any type of forensic pathology in my current job. Other jobs

have included an 18-month period of time at a laboratory in

suburban Chicago where I practiced the pathology of blood

disorders. Before that I was a fellow at Northwestern

Hospital. Before that I was a resident in pathology at the

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. Before that I

was a medical student in Boston. My wife is an attending

physician at the University of Chicago. She has been there

two years as a faculty member.

Q. If you can slow down a little bit.

A. Sorry.

Q. I appreciate the depth of the information, but we need to

get it down as well.

A. Sorry.

Q. So, your wife is an attending physician at the University

of Chicago?

A. Yes, she is primarily a clinician and researcher.

Q. Okay.

A. My hobbies include cooking, exercise, reading, mostly

American History. News outlet and print, New York Times,

occasionally The Economist. Web outlets, CNN, MSNBC,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 97 of 130 PageID #:2625
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:55:11

11:55:15

11:55:18

11:55:21

11:55:22

11:55:26

11:55:30

11:55:38

11:55:38

11:55:40

11:55:44

11:55:45

11:55:50

11:55:55

11:55:57

11:55:59

11:56:08

11:56:08

11:56:09

11:56:11

11:56:15

11:56:15

11:56:23

98

Reuter's, and Twitter most recently.

That is about it.

Q. And I might have missed this, but do you own your home in

Lakeview?

A. We do.

Q. And are you -- are you attached to a hospital?

A. Yes, at the present St. Joseph, which is at 2400 North

Lake Shore Drive.

Q. And how long have you worked there?

A. For a year.

Q. And then before that?

A. Before that I was at a company called Hematogenics for 18

months, that is a laboratory that specializes in hematology

diagnoses.

Q. And then that takes us back to med school?

A. Med school, yes, residency, and then Fellowship.

Q. All right.

Any television programs that you would watch

regularly?

A. I watch homeland, House of Cards, Dexter, and the Colbert

Report.

THE COURT: Okay.

Thank you.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 98 of 130 PageID #:2626
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:56:28

11:56:29

11:56:32

11:56:34

11:56:38

11:56:42

11:56:46

11:56:47

11:56:51

11:56:57

11:57:01

11:57:09

11:57:13

11:57:14

11:57:18

11:57:23

11:57:24

11:57:27

11:57:28

11:57:35

11:57:36

11:57:36

99

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. Jeff Foster from Geneva, Illinois. Lived there for 11

years. Own our home.

Bachelor degree in Aviation Management. I have been

employed by Jet Aviation for almost six years now as a

corporate pilot. Prior to that was McDonald's Corporation,

same, corporate pilot.

Let's see. Married, married for 18 years, one

daughter who is 13. My wife works part time at a doctor's

office in their billing department.

Let's see. Hobbies, pretty much just sports, that is

the major one. And news, just local news, Channel 5, Channel

7. That is probably about it.

Q. Do you watch any television programs regularly?

A. Mostly sports, Cubs, Bears, but nothing -- I wouldn't say

anything regular.

Q. And how long did you work at McDonald's as a corporate

pilot?

A. Almost four years.

THE COURT: Thank you.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 99 of 130 PageID #:2627
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:57:36

11:57:36

11:57:39

11:57:39

11:57:40

11:57:45

11:57:51

11:57:57

11:58:03

11:58:06

11:58:11

11:58:15

11:58:18

11:58:18

11:58:32

11:58:36

11:58:45

11:58:50

11:58:53

11:58:57

11:59:01

11:59:06

11:59:12

11:59:18

11:59:27

100

EXAMINATION

BY THE COURT:

Q. Okay.

A. My name is Donald Quirk. I am living in Lake Barrington.

I have lived there for about the last 20 years. I have been

employed, took early retirement in 2009, from McHenry County

College, a community college in McHenry County. I was the

Director of Institutional Research and Machining while I was

there. My responsibilities had to do with a whole variety of

enrollment management things, finding out about student

attrition, doing evaluation of its programs, things like

that.

Golly, what else? I am married and have been for

quite some time. My wife is an attorney. She is a partner at

Loftus & Saltzberg. She does civil litigation. She has been

doing that for quite some time, in the neighborhood of 20

years, as a matter of fact.

I have two children, a son who is 23, he is a

computer engineer with Texas Instrument in Dallas. I have a

daughter who is 28, she is a legal assistant in San Francisco

for a large law firm that has a small presence in San

Francisco. No other adults live at my house.

My hobbies have to do with outdoor activities, fly

fishing, hiking, things like that. I do a lot of reading. I

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 100 of 130 PageID #:2628
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

11:59:32

11:59:41

11:59:46

11:59:52

11:59:57

12:00:06

12:00:15

12:00:19

12:00:21

12:00:23

12:00:31

12:00:33

12:00:37

12:00:39

12:00:43

12:00:47

12:00:53

12:00:57

12:01:00

12:01:08

12:01:10

12:01:11

12:01:15

12:01:16

12:01:21

101

listen to music, I like jazz, really jazz, folk, and blues.

I watch Curb your Enthusiasm and Portlandia and other

types of HBO programming. As well as films. I don't watch a

lot of programming on the major stations.

I subscribe to the New Yorker, but I get a lot of my

news from on line, from Al Jazeera, from BBC, the Washington

Post, a few other sources like that.

That is pretty much it.

Q. How far did you get in school?

A. I have a Doctorate in English Education, my Bachelor's and

Master's were in English.

Q. And how long did you work for McHenry College before your

retirement?

A. Let's see, that is '93 to -- actually, I retired in about

2009, took early retirement, but I am still working there as

an adjunct instructor in English, part time obviously.

Q. And did you say you started with McHenry in 1993?

A. 1993, yes.

Q. Okay.

So your wife practices civil litigation only?

A. That is correct.

Q. Do you know what -- is there a specific focus that she

has?

A. Well, she has a background with the Consumer Protection

Division in the Attorney General's Division as well as the

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 101 of 130 PageID #:2629
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

12:01:24

12:01:28

12:01:34

12:01:37

12:01:43

12:01:49

12:01:54

12:01:55

12:01:58

12:02:01

12:02:05

12:02:19

12:02:19

12:02:23

12:02:28

12:02:31

12:02:34

12:02:40

12:02:45

12:02:49

12:02:51

12:02:54

12:02:59

12:03:02

12:03:05

102

Federal Trade Commission, and so she does a lot of work

related to trade, to false advertising, and to things like

that.

She has also done I think a -- what would you call

it, I wouldn't call it civil rights, I guess, but she has done

other suits as well.

Q. Okay.

Do you know if she represents generally consumers or

marketers and advertisers or a mix?

A. In the somewhat distant past she represented only

consumers. Now she represents primarily businesses and firms.

THE COURT: Thank you.

Before we go on, it is noon, so we are going to take

a lunch break at this time. We will take a one hour and 15

minute break, so I will see you back at 1:15.

A couple of things before you go though. First is

when you return please do return to the seats where you are at

now. You have seen us feverishly writing here, we have you

all down by some diagram, so please return to those seats.

The second thing is that I have instructed the

lawyers and the parties and the witnesses in this case to use

the south bank of elevators, that is the set of elevators that

is furthest away from this courtroom. I will ask you to use

the north bank of elevators, okay, the one that is right

around the corner here.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 102 of 130 PageID #:2630
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

12:03:07

12:03:09

12:03:13

12:03:17

12:03:20

12:03:24

12:03:26

12:03:31

12:03:35

12:03:35

12:03:40

12:03:43

12:03:48

12:03:52

12:03:55

12:04:00

12:04:01

12:04:05

12:04:08

12:04:12

12:04:14

12:04:19

12:04:23

12:04:26

12:04:30

103

I have also instructed the lawyers and the parties

and the witnesses to not acknowledge you in any way if they

see you, whether it is downstairs in the lobby or cafeteria or

anywhere else. They are not being unfriendly, they are just

under strict instructions to not interact with you outside of

this courtroom, because it is very important that everything

that -- if you are picked as a juror, everything that you

decide this case on is based upon what happened in this

courtroom.

Now, to that end, we are taking this break now, but I

must instruct you to not research this case in any way, no

getting on Google or anywhere else to research anything about

this case. Don't research the case. Don't research the

lawyers. Don't research any of the witnesses' names you have

heard, or my name, nothing about this case. Okay? Do not

investigate it at all.

If anyone approaches you and tries to talk to you

about the case, you must walk away from them and do not allow

them to talk to you about the case, and then let me know if

that happens to you.

This also goes to amongst yourselves, okay? So not

only have you not been picked to serve on a jury yet, but even

more importantly, if you are picked to serve on the jury, you

must keep an open mind for the entirety of the trial.

So you have heard nothing yet about the evidence in

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 103 of 130 PageID #:2631
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

12:04:33

12:04:38

12:04:43

12:04:46

12:04:50

12:04:55

12:04:58

12:04:59

12:05:04

12:05:10

12:05:15

12:05:20

12:05:22

12:05:25

12:05:28

12:05:32

12:05:35

12:05:39

12:05:43

12:05:45

12:05:49

12:05:52

12:05:55

12:05:56

12:05:58

104

this case, so you can't even talk to one another right now

because I don't want you to start forming even any early

opinions about this case, okay? It is just not possible to do

that right now, and it is very unfair to the parties in the

case to start speculating at all and to start deliberating

amongst yourselves. So no talking to each other about the

case as well.

Now, of course, not only can you not talk to each

other about the case, but no talking to anyone else, and that

includes hopping on Twitter and tweeting, like, Being picked

for jury in U.S. versus Dvorkin, can't do that. No blog

posts. No posts to Facebook.

There are a lot of smiles here, but I will tell you

each of the things I have mentioned have happened in some

case, and it absolutely cannot happen, because once you start

broadcasting about how you were participating in the case you

do make it easier for people to seek you out and talk to you.

And there also runs the risk that you are forming opinions

because you are communicating about it.

That is a lot of instructions but hopefully they are

all ones that you will be able to follow.

I will see you back here at 1:15. Please do take

your seats.

All rise.

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 104 of 130 PageID #:2632
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

105

(The jury leaves the courtroom.)

(Proceedings concluded.)

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 105 of 130 PageID #:2633
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

106

C E R T I F I C A T E

I certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript

from the record of proceedings in the above-entitled matter.

/s/Krista Burgeson, CSR, RMR, CRR December 23, 2013

Federal Official Court Reporter Date

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 106 of 130 PageID #:2634
'

'75 [1] - 44:12

'79 [1] - 44:6

'93 [1] - 101:14

'em [4] - 88:19, 88:20, 88:22

/

/s/Krista [1] - 106:7

1

1 [2] - 40:6, 43:16

1-A [1] - 1:9

10 [6] - 35:19, 40:11, 46:5,

81:6, 83:14, 86:25

10:00 [1] - 54:21

11 [7] - 40:11, 49:23, 53:13,

61:20, 94:14, 96:11, 99:5

11th [1] - 15:9

12 [8] - 1:5, 3:3, 12:23, 12:25,

13:5, 64:21, 81:6, 91:12

12.25 [1] - 13:2

13 [7] - 13:1, 76:6, 77:22,

78:4, 78:19, 85:15, 99:12

14 [9] - 36:3, 36:19, 38:19,

58:11, 75:10, 79:6, 85:18,

86:25, 94:13

15 [7] - 26:19, 46:5, 57:22,

65:23, 81:4, 94:6, 102:14

16 [3] - 34:7, 56:13, 94:14

17 [2] - 40:13, 40:15

18 [5] - 13:10, 40:15, 83:6,

98:12, 99:11

18-month [1] - 97:6

19 [1] - 40:15

1981 [2] - 64:12, 64:14

1993 [2] - 101:17, 101:18

1:15 [2] - 102:15, 104:22

2

2 [1] - 78:9

20 [6] - 47:12, 50:10, 54:25,

86:21, 100:6, 100:17

2005 [1] - 88:16

2009 [3] - 63:21, 100:7,

101:15

2011 [1] - 46:23

2012 [1] - 19:7

2013 [2] - 1:7, 106:7

21 [2] - 54:14, 96:6

219 [2] - 1:14, 1:24

23 [6] - 36:20, 37:1, 38:19,

75:10, 100:19, 106:7

24 [7] - 40:16, 49:4, 49:5,

54:11, 54:14, 58:5, 66:2

2400 [1] - 98:7

25 [6] - 40:16, 53:9, 58:1,

63:1, 72:16, 85:18

26 [2] - 1:7, 54:14

28 [2] - 53:8, 100:21

3

3 [1] - 35:7

30 [3] - 37:2, 37:10, 56:23

30's [1] - 44:13

302 [4] - 19:6, 22:1, 25:19,

28:22

31 [1] - 78:5

312-353-5300 [1] - 1:15

312-435-5567 [1] - 1:25

312-463-1000 [1] - 1:22

312-759-9600 [1] - 1:19

32 [4] - 49:4, 49:8, 49:10,

63:19

33 [2] - 37:12, 37:20

333 [1] - 1:21

35 [3] - 2:9, 37:21, 81:22

36 [2] - 80:17, 81:11

37 [2] - 79:16, 80:20

38 [1] - 80:16

39 [2] - 25:13, 38:10

3:30 [3] - 69:15, 70:23, 71:19

3rd [4] - 73:18, 92:7, 92:15,

93:1

4

4 [2] - 22:2, 35:12

40 [1] - 66:24

403 [4] - 21:10, 21:20, 29:19,

30:12

404(a [1] - 20:5

404(b [3] - 21:25, 22:4, 22:6

46 [1] - 79:13

47 [1] - 79:12

48 [1] - 66:3

4:00 [1] - 73:18

4th [2] - 73:14, 92:14

5

5 [6] - 37:23, 55:24, 64:23,

83:6, 83:9, 99:15

500 [2] - 1:5, 3:3

1

53 [1] - 1:18

5:00 [1] - 54:21

5:30 [1] - 66:8

5th [1] - 38:4

6

6 [2] - 2:6, 37:23

60604 [3] - 1:15, 1:18, 1:25

60606 [1] - 1:21

608 [1] - 33:17

608(a [1] - 27:1

7

7 [5] - 55:24, 62:17, 63:15,

77:21, 99:16

70 [3] - 25:11, 35:12, 35:16

720 [1] - 78:10

780 [1] - 78:10

7:00 [3] - 69:14, 70:22, 73:18

7th [1] - 19:7

8

8:45 [2] - 1:7, 3:15

8th [1] - 47:17

9

9 [4] - 40:9, 40:11, 78:9

A

a.m [2] - 1:7, 73:18

abiding [5] - 20:2, 21:3,

21:13, 21:14, 21:15

abidingness [5] - 19:13, 22:7,

22:13, 22:17, 24:12

able [14] - 14:9, 15:3, 27:25,

28:12, 28:15, 32:17, 32:18,

58:13, 59:19, 71:15, 73:24,

74:16, 92:9, 104:21

above-entitled [1] - 106:5

absolutely [1] - 104:15

accept [1] - 33:5

access [2] - 73:16, 89:24

account [3] - 10:23, 94:8,

94:24

accounting [5] - 62:3, 84:7,

84:9, 85:1, 85:2

accounts [2] - 50:18, 94:10

accreditation [1] - 92:11

accredited [1] - 73:21

accusations [1] - 21:15

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 107 of 130 PageID #:2635
accused [2] - 8:5, 42:5

acknowledge [1] - 103:2

activities [2] - 70:21, 100:24

actor [1] - 52:19

acts [9] - 23:9, 26:17, 26:22,

27:9, 31:23, 32:4, 32:8,

32:14, 32:22

actual [2] - 17:25, 70:2

Adalia [2] - 6:13, 43:11

Adamovich [6] - 36:4, 40:23,

65:14, 75:10, 77:7, 77:9

add [4] - 10:13, 11:23, 12:16,

29:11

adding [1] - 5:5

addition [2] - 33:14, 81:17

additional [3] - 20:9, 75:21,

75:24

adjudicated [1] - 20:20

adjunct [1] - 101:16

adjustments [1] - 95:6

administer [1] - 39:19

administration [3] - 58:3,

60:23, 60:24

administrative [4] - 91:3,

91:15, 95:4, 96:14

admissibility [1] - 30:22

admissible [2] - 15:20, 34:11

admit [1] - 17:12

adults [2] - 94:15, 100:23

advertisers [1] - 102:9

advertising [2] - 85:20, 102:2

Advocate [1] - 58:8

affected [1] - 63:21

affidavits [1] - 28:12

affiliate [1] - 52:1

afford [1] - 37:4

afield [1] - 23:20

African [2] - 71:3, 72:13

afternoon [1] - 28:20

agencies [2] - 59:7, 88:13

agency [2] - 59:1, 69:24

agent [1] - 78:17

Agent [1] - 42:17

aggregate [2] - 89:5, 92:2

ago [9] - 45:6, 51:17, 55:6,

58:11, 64:16, 68:23, 80:15,

95:23

agree [1] - 35:5

ahead [5] - 21:24, 51:12,

68:20, 75:4, 82:23

aid [1] - 95:21

aids [1] - 10:5

ain't [1] - 31:2

Air [1] - 61:7

Airlines [1] - 57:5

Akhras [6] - 41:2, 72:16,

72:22, 73:4, 91:11, 93:17

AKHRAS [1] - 72:17

Al [1] - 101:6

alert [1] - 76:1

Alexander [2] - 5:11, 43:11

Alexian [2] - 83:6, 83:15

Alicia [2] - 40:22, 60:22

Alison [1] - 37:20

allegations [1] - 20:18

alleged [2] - 14:12, 30:13

alleviate [1] - 31:11

allow [7] - 20:16, 26:3, 32:25,

33:18, 33:19, 73:21, 103:18

allowed [7] - 9:6, 10:4, 19:22,

27:20, 29:14, 33:16, 74:2

almost [3] - 63:19, 99:8,

99:22

alone [1] - 53:8

alphabetical [1] - 40:19

Alta [1] - 94:5

alternates [1] - 76:1

Alvin [2] - 40:22, 62:24

AMERICA [1] - 1:3

America [2] - 79:11, 82:7

American [2] - 95:20, 97:24

Americans [2] - 71:3, 72:13

amount [1] - 31:19

Ampitech [1] - 51:19

analysis [1] - 89:6

anatomical [1] - 97:2

animosity [1] - 60:1

annoyed [1] - 10:2

answer [3] - 35:6, 41:12,

75:22

answered [1] - 35:19

answering [1] - 39:18

anti [2] - 22:15, 23:22

anti-character [2] - 22:15,

23:22

anticipate [2] - 12:11, 14:16

Anwar [4] - 41:2, 72:16,

72:22, 91:11

apartment [2] - 62:25, 83:1

APPEARANCES [1] - 1:11

appearances [1] - 3:5

applications [1] - 59:1

applied [2] - 58:23, 64:3

applies [1] - 21:10

applying [1] - 59:6

appreciate [3] - 39:14, 74:11,

2

97:16

approach [1] - 24:8

approaches [2] - 14:21,

103:17

appropriate [3] - 27:1, 32:1,

72:5

architect [2] - 88:12, 90:2

architecture [1] - 85:17

area [2] - 15:25, 62:25

Arestis [3] - 35:20, 40:22,

57:20

ARESTIS [1] - 35:20

argue [8] - 14:9, 15:1, 15:2,

15:8, 18:17, 27:17, 34:4,

34:6

argued [1] - 16:10

arguing [1] - 17:22

argument [5] - 17:6, 19:8,

22:4, 34:5, 34:9

arguments [1] - 9:23

art [4] - 63:1, 85:16, 85:19,

90:13

articles [1] - 11:6

articulated [1] - 30:3

arts [1] - 86:23

aside [2] - 28:21, 38:8

assets [3] - 27:15, 27:17, 28:4

assist [1] - 53:15

assistant [5] - 91:3, 91:15,

95:4, 96:14, 100:21

associate's [1] - 50:14

association [2] - 95:24, 96:13

assume [2] - 24:22, 75:15

assure [1] - 28:13

AT&T [1] - 4:4

Atlantic [1] - 52:2

attach [2] - 25:23, 25:24

attached [1] - 98:6

attempt [2] - 28:1, 31:11

attend [4] - 73:20, 73:24,

74:23, 90:20

attending [3] - 97:1, 97:11,

97:19

attention [5] - 10:6, 30:13,

74:10, 93:6, 93:10

attorney [6] - 15:22, 64:17,

64:19, 82:8, 100:15, 101:25

ATTORNEY'S [1] - 1:13

attrition [1] - 100:12

audible [2] - 25:4, 34:13

August [2] - 1:7, 19:7

Aurora [10] - 60:22, 61:17,

61:19, 66:4, 66:24, 67:3,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 108 of 130 PageID #:2636
67:4, 95:19, 96:11

available [4] - 7:12, 66:18,

66:19, 66:20

avenues [1] - 20:9

aviation [3] - 51:24, 99:7,

99:8

avoid [1] - 10:11

B

baby [1] - 49:4

babysitting [1] - 96:15

bachelor [4] - 63:1, 90:12,

96:24, 99:7

Bachelor's [12] - 46:7, 51:14,

58:2, 58:6, 60:23, 79:8,

79:21, 79:23, 84:7, 91:12,

95:20, 101:10

backdoor [1] - 32:8

backdooring [2] - 31:22,

32:14

background [2] - 75:11,

101:24

bad [2] - 56:3, 70:4

Baker [3] - 88:9, 88:15, 89:8

balancing [1] - 30:12

Ballet [1] - 90:16

Bank [6] - 49:24, 50:17,

79:11, 82:7

bank [8] - 12:14, 12:15, 82:10,

82:12, 82:13, 84:22, 102:22,

102:24

banker [3] - 85:2, 85:3, 85:6

Banker [2] - 54:11, 54:18

bar [11] - 36:17, 38:20, 41:13,

41:16, 41:19, 65:15, 65:17,

75:15, 92:16, 95:23, 96:13

Barnes [2] - 41:3, 94:1

Barrington [1] - 100:5

bars [3] - 10:4, 75:23, 77:13

Bartlett [3] - 56:10, 56:19,

56:22

based [11] - 18:9, 19:20, 20:1,

22:10, 37:10, 43:21, 65:14,

88:6, 88:16, 89:16, 103:8

baseless [1] - 28:16

bases [1] - 89:12

basis [6] - 24:4, 25:25, 28:14,

28:18, 38:2, 96:12

Bassett [1] - 56:15

Bates [1] - 28:9

BBC [1] - 101:6

beacon [1] - 96:12

bears [1] - 99:18

became [1] - 64:2

BEFORE [1] - 1:10

begin [1] - 29:9

begins [3] - 7:18, 92:13,

92:14

behalf [2] - 3:7, 3:11

behavior[1] - 24:10

behind [1] - 40:17

bench [6] - 10:3, 40:14,

40:25, 41:3, 41:6, 81:25

benches [2] - 40:6, 40:11

Benedictine [1] - 58:7

Berger [2] - 37:12, 37:20

BERGER [1] - 37:13

Berwyn [4] - 44:5, 44:16,

53:7, 53:12

best [1] - 34:7

Beth [1] - 97:10

Bethany [1] - 96:4

better [2] - 23:25, 87:10

between [2] - 21:6, 91:25

Bevin [1] - 32:10

Bevis [15] - 4:2, 6:25, 14:14,

15:9, 20:22, 21:6, 27:21,

29:14, 31:15, 31:19, 32:1,

32:9, 32:18, 33:7, 43:8

BEVIS [1] - 4:2

Bevis's [1] - 31:22

beyond [1] - 9:15

Bialy [4] - 40:21, 53:4, 53:5,

53:10

bias [1] - 7:6

biassed [1] - 59:25

bids [1] - 62:4

big [2] - 87:5, 88:13

Bill [1] - 86:3

billing [2] - 50:15, 99:13

bills [1] - 37:5

biographical [1] - 43:20

biographicals [1] - 75:23

bit [12] - 7:20, 21:9, 30:16,

41:20, 47:15, 56:16, 57:13,

61:12, 62:7, 68:13, 97:14

blog [1] - 104:11

blogging [1] - 10:24

blood [2] - 97:3, 97:7

Bloomingdale's [1] - 87:16

blues [1] - 101:1

Board [1] - 55:10

board [1] - 90:14

Bob [2] - 5:12, 43:10

BOB [1] - 5:14

3

Bonnie [1] - 41:6

border [1] - 71:18

Boston [2] - 97:10, 97:11

bottoms [1] - 95:18

Bottoms [1] - 41:3

Boulevard [1] - 1:18

bouncer[1] - 45:8

box [3] - 28:20, 38:18, 40:5

brand [1] - 17:9

break [10] - 12:11, 12:12,

74:6, 74:12, 74:17, 76:15,

76:25, 102:14, 102:15,

103:10

breaking [1] - 56:2

breaks [1] - 74:5

bridge [2] - 6:23, 7:14

brief [2] - 18:20, 19:3

briefly [1] - 16:1

bring [3] - 38:18, 38:24, 74:9

bringing [1] - 38:23

broadcasting [1] - 104:16

Broniec [2] - 41:2, 88:1

Bronzeville [1] - 91:17

Brook [2] - 94:9, 94:25

Brookfield [1] - 53:5

brooks [1] - 39:21

Brooks [1] - 39:9

brother[2] - 35:7, 91:23

Brothers [1] - 83:7

brothers [1] - 91:23

brown [2] - 51:16, 52:9

build [2] - 78:1, 81:17

building [3] - 49:24, 56:13,

64:20

burden [2] - 9:9, 9:17

Bureau [1] - 58:23

Buren [1] - 46:10

BURGESON [1] - 1:24

Burgeson [2] - 39:12, 106:7

bus [2] - 36:6, 66:5

busier [1] - 91:22

business [20] - 19:15, 19:18,

19:21, 20:19, 22:11, 35:21,

37:3, 44:10, 44:20, 44:23,

57:21, 57:24, 58:12, 60:23,

60:24, 85:18, 86:10, 87:14,

91:21

businesses [1] - 102:11

businessmen [1] - 85:3

buzz [1] - 12:8

BY [31] - 44:2, 46:2, 47:9,

49:20, 51:10, 53:2, 54:2,

56:7, 57:17, 60:19, 62:21,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 109 of 130 PageID #:2637
64:8, 65:12, 68:7, 73:2,

77:18, 79:2, 80:9, 82:4,

82:20, 84:2, 85:10, 86:17,

87:23, 90:7, 91:8, 93:23,

95:15, 96:19, 99:2, 100:2

C

cable [3] - 87:6, 87:19, 88:25

cafeteria [1] - 103:3

California [1] - 88:6

campaign [1] - 17:21

cannot [5] - 30:1, 30:24,

36:21, 72:10, 104:15

capacity [1] - 81:14

Caprio [2] - 41:1, 86:20

car [3] - 8:2, 42:2, 79:13

cards [1] - 98:20

care [7] - 22:16, 47:19, 54:16,

57:6, 58:9, 58:10, 68:21

career [2] - 50:14, 95:25

carefully [1] - 43:4

cars [2] - 51:23, 78:6

Caruso [2] - 41:2, 90:10

case [54] - 4:17, 7:17, 7:20,

7:22, 7:25, 9:13, 9:14,

10:10, 10:15, 10:16, 10:19,

10:22, 11:1, 11:2, 11:3,

11:7, 11:8, 11:13, 15:17,

16:18, 20:11, 20:12, 20:13,

20:24, 23:7, 24:16, 24:18,

39:7, 41:20, 41:22, 41:25,

42:8, 42:10, 42:22, 71:14,

72:3, 89:15, 102:21, 103:8,

103:11, 103:13, 103:15,

103:18, 103:19, 104:1,

104:3, 104:5, 104:7, 104:9,

104:15, 104:16

cases [3] - 9:5, 89:11, 89:20

cast [1] - 33:14

CBS [1] - 56:17

Celine [2] - 40:21, 54:5

center [3] - 63:7, 63:9, 69:12

Center [1] - 97:10

certain [7] - 15:10, 41:17,

60:1, 61:11, 62:11, 68:22,

69:3

certainly [2] - 15:20, 27:6

certificate [2] - 50:15, 53:7

certify [1] - 106:4

challenge [2] - 72:10, 72:11

challenges [3] - 29:24, 72:2,

76:2

Champaign [1] - 86:22

chance [1] - 93:17

Chang [1] - 39:6

CHANG [1] - 1:10

change [5] - 16:18, 17:17,

50:14, 71:23, 76:1

channel [9] - 63:15, 64:23,

78:9, 83:9, 92:3, 96:11,

99:15

channels [3] - 54:20, 55:22,

55:24

character [43] - 5:17, 5:24,

6:2, 6:15, 19:23, 20:6, 20:7,

20:23, 21:6, 21:7, 22:7,

22:9, 22:12, 22:15, 22:17,

22:21, 23:2, 23:6, 23:15,

23:16, 23:18, 23:19, 23:22,

24:1, 24:8, 24:10, 24:15,

24:16, 24:21, 24:23, 27:2,

27:4, 27:24, 29:8, 29:9,

29:10, 30:7, 30:10, 33:1,

33:12, 34:3, 34:8

characters [1] - 33:14

charge [6] - 7:24, 8:1, 41:24,

42:1, 81:16, 83:3

charged [4] - 9:16, 14:1,

14:11, 14:20

charges [7] - 7:21, 7:23, 8:8,

9:12, 41:21, 41:23, 42:8

Charlene [2] - 40:24, 79:5

Charles [3] - 66:8, 66:23,

66:24

Chase [2] - 49:24, 50:17

chase [1] - 50:16

checking [1] - 81:16

checks [1] - 50:19

Chester [2] - 41:1, 84:5

Chicago [29] - 1:6, 1:15, 1:18,

1:21, 1:25, 46:8, 47:12,

49:23, 51:16, 51:19, 52:1,

53:21, 55:9, 62:25, 63:16,

70:25, 79:18, 84:6, 84:22,

85:13, 88:5, 88:10, 90:21,

91:17, 96:11, 96:21, 97:7,

97:12, 97:20

CHICO [1] - 1:20

chief [3] - 20:11, 24:16, 24:18

child [2] - 49:7, 49:25

childcare [1] - 36:4

children [18] - 44:12, 45:7,

46:17, 48:11, 49:3, 53:16,

58:1, 58:13, 61:8, 63:13,

70:25, 83:5, 87:4, 88:18,

4

90:19, 91:19, 94:14, 100:19

Children's [1] - 90:13

children's [2] - 58:8, 96:5

Choate [2] - 4:3, 43:7

CHOATE [1] - 4:3

Circuit [1] - 9:10

circumstances [2] - 16:10,

16:12

circus [1] - 15:24

Citadel [1] - 49:24

cities [1] - 59:3

citizen [1] - 20:2

City [2] - 54:15, 69:6

city [1] - 44:5

civil [6] - 46:7, 64:16, 89:20,

100:16, 101:20, 102:5

claim [1] - 7:11

claims [5] - 7:12, 56:15, 57:6,

57:8, 95:8

classmates [1] - 67:1

clear [6] - 18:21, 24:18, 28:1,

55:21, 64:24, 69:18

clerk [2] - 39:9, 39:19

CLERK [5] - 3:1, 38:22, 39:1,

39:4, 39:22

clerk's [1] - 26:3

clerks [1] - 39:10

clerkships [1] - 74:3

Cleveland [1] - 88:17

client [1] - 12:13

clients [2] - 82:10, 82:13

clinical [2] - 63:11, 97:2

clinician [1] - 97:21

clock [2] - 93:7, 93:10

close [2] - 10:5, 75:25

closed [4] - 37:22, 38:4,

51:17, 52:10

closely [2] - 20:22, 90:14

closer [3] - 47:15, 67:6, 68:14

closest [2] - 40:6, 40:14

closings [1] - 9:6

clothing [4] - 87:1, 87:2,

87:13

CNA [1] - 94:13

CNBC [1] - 84:14

CNN [4] - 47:5, 53:21, 63:14,

97:25

co [2] - 71:14

co-volunteers [1] - 71:14

co-workers [1] - 71:14

coach [1] - 68:21

Coast [1] - 94:10

coding [1] - 50:15

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 110 of 130 PageID #:2638
COHEN [1] - 1:17

Colbert [2] - 79:19, 98:20

Coldwell [2] - 54:10, 54:18

collateral [5] - 23:17, 23:18,

29:8, 29:22, 29:24

college [15] - 44:8, 46:9,

46:14, 54:9, 56:12, 58:13,

80:3, 81:9, 83:22, 84:18,

94:4, 95:21, 100:8, 101:12

comedies [3] - 56:16, 78:12,

83:11

comedy [1] - 61:13

coming [2] - 31:2, 74:8

comment [2] - 17:2, 17:3

comments [2] - 16:25, 93:3

commercial [4] - 78:1, 85:6,

86:12, 86:13

commission [1] - 102:1

commit [2] - 7:25, 41:25

committed [2] - 8:3, 42:3

committing [2] - 8:5, 42:5

commodities [1] - 55:9

communicate [1] - 11:16

communicating [1] - 104:19

community [5] - 39:16, 54:9,

71:21, 95:21, 100:8

companies [2] - 85:3, 88:13

company [28] - 17:7, 33:20,

33:21, 46:14, 46:25, 48:5,

48:8, 51:15, 51:18, 51:19,

52:21, 54:15, 57:1, 57:3,

61:5, 62:1, 62:9, 77:23,

77:25, 79:15, 83:2, 87:1,

88:4, 94:5, 94:9, 95:5, 98:12

compensation [1] - 57:8

complaint [3] - 14:11, 14:12,

14:21

complete [2] - 89:14, 92:9

completed [2] - 9:5, 46:23

completely [2] - 16:13, 16:16

compromise [1] - 33:5

computer[2] - 4:10, 100:20

concern [7] - 17:19, 30:3,

30:9, 31:11, 32:17, 75:14,

92:24

concerned [1] - 22:25

concluded [1] - 105:3

conduct [4] - 10:9, 22:5, 31:3,

31:16

conferences [1] - 10:3

confessions [1] - 15:16

confidence [1] - 7:2

confident [1] - 37:23

conflict [4] - 38:2, 68:20,

71:4, 71:6

confront [1] - 23:15

confuse [1] - 29:10

connect [2] - 31:6, 33:11

connection [2] - 30:6, 30:11

consciousness [9] - 14:10,

14:25, 15:3, 15:10, 15:25,

16:9, 16:11, 16:25, 18:2

consists [1] - 9:20

consultant [1] - 85:4

consulting [3] - 11:11, 88:4,

90:17

consults [1] - 55:20

consumer[1] - 101:24

consumers [2] - 102:8,

102:11

contact [1] - 74:18

contacted [1] - 74:4

context [1] - 16:14

continue [2] - 73:22, 77:12

continued [2] - 77:5, 93:14

continues [1] - 9:12

continuing [1] - 54:16

Continuing [2] - 32:12, 55:13

continuous [1] - 74:6

contract [2] - 61:5, 62:8

contracting [1] - 62:4

conversation [6] - 14:24,

18:6, 18:7, 18:8, 18:10,

18:13

convinced [1] - 9:15

cooking [1] - 97:23

cooks [1] - 61:2

cooperating [1] - 17:8

coordinator[2] - 74:16, 92:6

copies [1] - 35:3

copy [1] - 28:25

core [1] - 74:3

Cori [2] - 41:3, 94:1

corner [1] - 102:25

corporate [3] - 99:9, 99:10,

99:20

corporation [3] - 53:19, 88:5,

99:9

Correct [2] - 59:22, 89:21

correct [4] - 60:10, 89:10,

101:21, 106:4

counsel [7] - 12:7, 13:17,

13:23, 15:1, 42:12, 42:21,

42:25

counselor [1] - 95:21

county [1] - 100:7

5

County [7] - 80:14, 80:17,

81:12, 88:2, 95:23, 96:13,

100:8

couple [6] - 15:24, 63:25,

68:23, 78:7, 88:3, 102:16

course [4] - 15:13, 41:12,

64:21, 104:8

Court [13] - 1:23, 5:4, 11:13,

11:25, 15:14, 21:2, 28:13,

28:15, 30:24, 32:24, 39:6,

71:22, 106:7

COURT [168] - 1:1, 1:23, 3:3,

3:14, 3:19, 3:23, 4:6, 4:9,

4:12, 4:14, 4:23, 5:7, 5:13,

5:15, 5:18, 5:20, 5:22, 5:25,

6:3, 6:5, 6:9, 6:14, 6:22, 7:8,

7:14, 8:13, 8:16, 10:17,

11:20, 12:6, 12:10, 12:19,

12:24, 13:1, 13:3, 13:6,

13:10, 13:19, 16:2, 17:18,

21:22, 21:24, 22:3, 23:4,

23:8, 23:13, 23:21, 24:13,

25:1, 25:4, 25:8, 25:17,

25:20, 26:4, 26:7, 26:10,

27:8, 27:10, 28:6, 28:21,

28:25, 29:4, 29:20, 33:5,

34:4, 34:15, 35:2, 35:17,

35:19, 35:25, 36:2, 36:9,

36:15, 37:1, 37:7, 37:10,

37:20, 38:3, 38:6, 38:8,

38:17, 38:24, 39:5, 40:1,

42:18, 42:23, 44:2, 45:25,

46:2, 47:6, 47:9, 49:17,

49:20, 51:5, 51:10, 53:2,

54:2, 56:4, 56:7, 57:17,

58:22, 60:16, 60:19, 62:18,

62:21, 63:17, 64:4, 64:8,

65:9, 65:12, 65:21, 66:11,

67:12, 67:15, 67:17, 67:22,

68:1, 68:7, 70:6, 70:8,

70:10, 70:14, 70:16, 70:20,

71:9, 73:2, 75:2, 75:4,

75:16, 75:20, 76:11, 76:16,

76:18, 76:21, 77:3, 77:7,

77:18, 78:22, 79:2, 80:6,

80:9, 82:4, 82:20, 83:24,

84:2, 85:7, 85:10, 86:14,

86:17, 87:23, 90:4, 90:7,

91:5, 91:8, 92:16, 93:1,

93:9, 93:17, 93:23, 95:12,

95:15, 96:16, 96:19, 98:22,

99:2, 99:23, 100:2, 102:12

court [17] - 3:2, 9:25, 31:2,

39:11, 41:15, 65:19, 65:23,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 111 of 130 PageID #:2639
67:20, 68:11, 68:15, 70:12,

72:24, 73:5, 75:7, 77:5,

89:18, 93:14

Court's [2] - 16:8, 75:17

courtroom [9] - 39:8, 39:19,

40:12, 72:18, 73:9, 102:23,

103:6, 103:9, 105:1

cover [1] - 43:21

covered [1] - 11:24

covers [1] - 6:10

coworkers [1] - 69:16

CR [2] - 1:5, 3:3

cranes [1] - 90:22

create [1] - 89:14

created [1] - 35:20

credibility [5] - 9:22, 29:23,

30:2, 59:8, 59:20

credible [1] - 30:20

credit [2] - 80:19, 81:5

credits [1] - 88:4

crime [2] - 7:25, 41:25

crimes [2] - 8:5, 42:5

criminal [7] - 14:11, 14:12,

39:7, 50:13, 58:19, 64:16,

83:11

cross [23] - 6:23, 7:14, 18:24,

23:1, 23:5, 24:4, 27:6,

27:11, 28:15, 29:12, 29:18,

30:22, 31:7, 31:15, 31:23,

31:24, 32:2, 32:10, 32:15,

32:18, 32:22, 32:25, 33:15

crossed [2] - 30:3, 31:4

crossing [1] - 24:3

CRR [1] - 106:7

CSR [1] - 106:7

Cubs [1] - 99:18

cumbersome [1] - 66:10

curb [1] - 101:2

current [4] - 60:25, 94:2,

94:21, 97:5

custodian [2] - 4:3, 6:21

customer[3] - 62:3, 83:3,

83:13

cycling [1] - 85:25

D

dad [2] - 51:2, 69:3

Daily [1] - 79:19

daily [1] - 96:12

daisy [2] - 37:21, 41:5

Dallas [1] - 100:20

damaging [1] - 17:12

Dan [2] - 6:18, 42:20

Daniel [7] - 3:3, 3:12, 5:11,

39:14, 40:21, 43:12, 51:13

DANIEL [1] - 1:6

dark [1] - 63:9

data [1] - 89:12

date [2] - 17:13, 37:24

Date [1] - 106:7

dates [1] - 74:8

daughter[12] - 55:11, 58:5,

58:20, 64:21, 79:13, 79:15,

80:16, 83:5, 96:3, 99:12,

100:21

daughters [3] - 54:13, 56:3,

96:2

days [6] - 35:22, 66:3, 66:12,

66:13, 66:18, 67:7

daytime [1] - 69:14

Deaconess [1] - 97:10

dealer [2] - 78:6, 79:13

dealings [3] - 19:18, 19:21,

20:19

Dearborn [2] - 1:14, 1:24

death [1] - 47:18

December [1] - 106:7

decide [2] - 9:22, 103:8

decided [1] - 25:12

decider [1] - 8:21

decides [1] - 24:20

decision [4] - 20:4, 24:11,

58:12, 72:9

Deerfield [1] - 88:8

Defendant [2] - 1:7, 1:17

defendant [27] - 3:12, 7:21,

7:24, 8:1, 8:5, 8:6, 9:3, 9:11,

9:15, 9:16, 9:18, 15:17,

18:4, 21:8, 22:15, 22:18,

22:19, 23:11, 23:25, 24:14,

41:21, 41:24, 42:1, 42:5,

42:6, 42:7, 42:25

defendant's [4] - 18:1, 20:6,

23:1, 23:5

defense [34] - 5:9, 8:13, 12:7,

13:4, 13:14, 13:17, 13:23,

14:5, 15:1, 18:5, 18:23,

19:2, 19:23, 20:23, 24:20,

26:14, 27:6, 27:21, 28:10,

29:7, 29:22, 30:2, 32:2,

32:17, 33:16, 33:19, 36:9,

42:18, 64:18, 65:1, 67:15,

70:8, 75:2

defense's [1] - 20:4

defrauded [1] - 32:19

6

degree [24] - 44:7, 46:7,

46:22, 46:23, 50:13, 50:14,

52:14, 53:7, 60:23, 64:13,

64:14, 81:9, 84:7, 85:2,

85:16, 86:23, 90:12, 92:11,

94:4, 95:20, 96:25, 99:7

Degree [5] - 51:14, 58:2, 79:8,

79:23, 90:12

degrees [1] - 50:13

Delarosa [2] - 41:1, 85:13

deliberate [1] - 9:8

deliberating [1] - 104:5

deliberations [1] - 9:13

delivering [1] - 46:14

denies [2] - 8:8, 42:8

dental [1] - 53:19

dentist [1] - 91:23

department [12] - 25:10,

39:10, 43:22, 50:18, 72:17,

74:4, 76:24, 77:10, 89:9,

90:1, 97:1, 99:13

depth [2] - 35:10, 97:16

deputy [4] - 39:8, 39:19,

72:18, 73:9

DeSanti [8] - 5:11, 20:17,

20:20, 20:21, 27:22, 31:17,

33:8, 43:12

describe [3] - 8:25, 9:20,

68:20

descriptors [1] - 33:3

design [8] - 37:3, 85:16,

85:18, 86:10, 86:13, 87:1,

87:2, 87:14

designer [1] - 96:4

designing [1] - 90:2

desk [1] - 88:10

detail [1] - 13:19

details [2] - 19:16, 28:6

Development [1] - 6:19

Devlin [1] - 39:10

Dexter [1] - 98:20

diagnoses [1] - 98:14

diagnosis [1] - 97:3

diagram [1] - 102:19

dictionaries [1] - 11:11

difference [1] - 21:5

different [7] - 21:9, 23:11,

27:12, 70:24, 89:6, 90:3

difficult [1] - 59:7

diploma [3] - 44:7, 77:22,

96:24

DIRE [2] - 2:9, 35:1

Dire [1] - 39:24

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 112 of 130 PageID #:2640
dire [9] - 21:1, 65:20, 67:20,

68:12, 70:12, 72:25, 75:8,

92:19, 93:15

direct [1] - 32:15

directed [1] - 94:10

directly [1] - 22:18

director [2] - 85:19, 100:9

directors [1] - 90:15

disagree [1] - 23:21

disclosure [1] - 13:22

discovery [5] - 89:12, 89:15,

89:16, 89:22, 89:23

discuss [4] - 6:18, 10:19,

11:2, 28:15

discussed [2] - 7:7, 8:19

discussing [2] - 10:10, 55:18

discussion [3] - 25:9, 32:24,

77:4

disorders [2] - 97:3, 97:8

dispatcher [2] - 94:6, 94:22

disposals [1] - 81:18

disputing [1] - 22:10

disqualified [1] - 71:7

disregard [1] - 9:24

distant [1] - 102:10

distribution [2] - 62:1, 95:25

DISTRICT [2] - 1:1, 1:1

district [7] - 68:24, 68:25,

69:2, 69:19, 69:22, 69:23,

91:18

districts [1] - 88:13

division [2] - 101:25

DIVISION [1] - 1:2

divorce [10] - 26:23, 27:14,

27:15, 28:8, 30:4, 30:14,

30:19, 30:21, 31:10, 31:25

divorced [4] - 54:13, 55:5,

55:6, 94:11

docket [1] - 25:22

doctor [2] - 53:15, 96:25

doctor's [1] - 99:12

doctorate [1] - 101:10

document [2] - 7:21, 41:21

documentary [2] - 63:8,

63:12

documents [6] - 14:13, 14:17,

14:19, 16:17, 16:21

DOD [1] - 69:25

Donald [2] - 41:4, 100:5

done [3] - 78:18, 102:4, 102:5

door [6] - 17:6, 18:23, 19:2,

24:15, 24:22, 49:24

dots [3] - 31:6, 33:11

doubt [1] - 9:15

down [13] - 12:3, 15:22,

25:13, 35:6, 40:10, 58:20,

65:16, 76:3, 76:5, 81:24,

97:14, 97:17, 102:19

downstairs [3] - 73:16, 76:11,

103:3

drama [1] - 61:12

draw [3] - 28:2, 30:18, 71:22

drawn [2] - 18:14, 72:1

Drive [2] - 1:21, 98:8

driver's [1] - 71:23

drop [1] - 76:2

dropped [1] - 25:13

dropping [1] - 76:5

drove [1] - 38:12

duplicated [1] - 9:17

duration [1] - 11:22

during [9] - 7:11, 9:13, 14:6,

27:15, 39:18, 43:3, 74:7,

91:16

duties [4] - 39:16, 50:16,

53:14, 61:1

DVORKIN [1] - 1:6

Dvorkin [30] - 3:4, 3:12, 4:8,

7:1, 8:8, 14:1, 14:10, 14:12,

14:18, 15:21, 16:20, 17:4,

17:6, 19:11, 19:15, 19:17,

19:20, 20:2, 20:12, 20:21,

21:3, 21:8, 21:13, 21:16,

39:14, 42:7, 42:20, 104:11

Dvorkin's [2] - 22:12, 26:15

dwell [1] - 15:20

E

e-discovery [3] - 89:15,

89:22, 89:23

E.J.M [1] - 46:11

early [7] - 28:23, 64:3, 71:17,

95:22, 100:7, 101:15, 104:2

earn [1] - 45:4

easier [1] - 104:17

east [1] - 67:2

East [1] - 94:10

EASTERN [1] - 1:2

economist [2] - 52:1, 97:25

Eddie's [1] - 60:25

Edmond [1] - 39:6

EDMOND [1] - 1:10

education [4] - 50:12, 54:16,

79:24, 101:10

educational [1] - 79:15

7

effect [1] - 37:16

effort [2] - 3:15, 3:16

eight [4] - 40:15, 65:2, 73:24,

95:22

either [4] - 34:13, 36:23,

60:12, 92:1

el [1] - 77:10

eldest [1] - 48:21

Eleanor [2] - 4:4, 43:8

electives [1] - 74:1

elementary [1] - 79:24

elements [1] - 8:19

elevators [5] - 12:14, 12:17,

102:22, 102:24

Elgin [3] - 56:11, 56:21, 78:15

elicit [4] - 14:9, 15:4, 15:12,

28:2

eliciting [1] - 14:25

eligible [1] - 64:2

Elk [1] - 83:1

email [1] - 73:16

embarrass [1] - 41:12

emphasize [1] - 63:4

employed [12] - 37:3, 44:9,

54:10, 69:19, 77:22, 79:9,

79:16, 80:2, 94:5, 96:3,

99:8, 100:7

employee [2] - 6:18, 60:25

employees [2] - 37:4, 83:4

employer [2] - 88:5, 96:1

employment [2] - 37:11, 70:2

encouraged [1] - 15:10

end [6] - 13:7, 37:23, 42:16,

43:5, 81:7, 103:10

ended [2] - 14:24, 77:4

enforcement [10] - 58:2, 59:1,

59:7, 59:8, 59:13, 59:16,

59:18, 59:20, 60:7, 60:8

engage [1] - 70:21

engaged [2] - 19:17, 31:16

engineer [1] - 100:20

engineering [9] - 46:8, 46:10,

46:11, 46:13, 46:19, 51:15,

51:20, 52:12

English [3] - 101:10, 101:11,

101:16

enjoined [1] - 27:14

enjoy [2] - 84:10, 94:16

enjoying [1] - 58:17

enrollment [1] - 100:11

enthusiasm [1] - 101:2

entire [7] - 61:3, 67:20, 70:12,

75:7, 92:19, 93:7, 93:15

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 113 of 130 PageID #:2641
entirety [1] - 103:24

entitled [2] - 33:16, 106:5

entry [1] - 26:2

environmental [2] - 81:15,

81:18

equipment [5] - 61:5, 62:4,

62:8, 94:5, 96:2

Eric [2] - 5:2, 43:10

Erin [4] - 4:5, 4:10, 4:12, 43:8

ERIN [1] - 4:12

especially [3] - 17:12, 30:21,

71:21

essentially [3] - 12:1, 15:8,

31:1

estate [1] - 55:15

estimated [1] - 76:3

evaluate [4] - 24:8, 59:15,

59:16, 59:20

evaluation [1] - 100:12

Evanston [1] - 37:13

evening [2] - 69:12, 69:15

event [1] - 24:9

events [1] - 70:19

Evergreen [1] - 57:25

evidence [37] - 8:6, 8:22,

8:23, 9:2, 9:4, 9:6, 9:7, 9:14,

9:19, 9:20, 9:23, 14:8,

15:15, 16:9, 17:24, 17:25,

20:6, 20:23, 21:3, 22:6,

22:15, 22:16, 22:23, 23:2,

23:23, 24:1, 24:8, 24:10,

24:15, 24:16, 30:1, 30:9,

30:20, 33:1, 33:11, 42:6,

103:25

evidentiary [1] - 30:7

ex [2] - 34:2, 94:12

ex-husband [1] - 94:12

ex-wife [1] - 34:2

exactly [4] - 7:23, 41:23,

60:14, 74:7

EXAMINATION [31] - 44:1,

46:1, 47:8, 49:19, 51:9,

53:1, 54:1, 56:6, 57:16,

60:18, 62:20, 64:7, 65:11,

68:6, 73:1, 77:17, 79:1,

80:8, 82:3, 82:19, 84:1,

85:9, 86:16, 87:22, 90:6,

91:7, 93:22, 95:14, 96:18,

99:1, 100:1

examination [8] - 24:4, 30:23,

31:23, 31:24, 32:15, 32:16,

32:23, 32:25

examine [4] - 28:15, 31:8,

31:15, 32:18

examined [2] - 27:6, 32:2

examiner [1] - 4:11

examiners [1] - 33:15

examintion [1] - 32:10

example [1] - 29:25

Exchange [1] - 55:10

exclude [1] - 19:5

excluded [2] - 21:20, 29:19

excuse [6] - 4:23, 25:12,

36:18, 71:16, 72:15, 75:10

excused [6] - 37:10, 37:20,

38:22, 38:25, 77:8, 93:19

excusing [8] - 35:13, 36:7,

37:7, 37:17, 67:22, 70:14,

92:22, 93:12

exercise [1] - 97:23

exhibits [1] - 9:21

expectation [1] - 16:20

expert [1] - 89:18

explain [1] - 31:12

explicitly [1] - 12:4

expressed [1] - 75:13

extensive [1] - 64:15

extra [4] - 13:12, 22:16,

25:15, 60:6

extremely [1] - 31:14

extrinsic [2] - 30:1, 30:8

F

face [2] - 17:19, 18:21

Facebook [4] - 10:10, 10:15,

10:23, 104:12

fact [12] - 4:7, 15:13, 15:15,

15:16, 15:17, 18:13, 18:17,

18:19, 23:6, 59:6, 59:12,

100:18

facts [1] - 14:25

factual [1] - 22:16

faculty [1] - 97:13

fair [4] - 27:22, 35:7, 41:11,

75:14

faith [2] - 24:4, 28:14

fall [1] - 21:16

false [1] - 102:2

familiar [1] - 19:20

family [6] - 10:20, 35:21,

47:18, 58:12, 78:4, 96:9

far [12] - 23:20, 28:3, 50:9,

50:12, 62:10, 66:23, 67:3,

81:8, 81:17, 83:21, 91:25,

101:9

8

Farkas [7] - 4:4, 13:15, 13:20,

14:16, 14:22, 18:16, 43:8

FARKAS [1] - 4:4

Fasciana [3] - 40:23, 64:11,

64:19

father [2] - 91:4, 91:20

FBI [4] - 4:3, 4:11, 14:15,

15:10

fear [1] - 18:13

FEDERAL [1] - 1:23

Federal [5] - 39:5, 58:23,

59:4, 89:15, 106:7

federal [2] - 59:5, 102:1

feet [1] - 65:23

fellow [2] - 10:20, 97:8

Fellowship [1] - 98:16

felt [2] - 14:4, 15:7

feverishly [1] - 102:18

few [7] - 21:12, 44:15, 47:23,

52:21, 55:23, 91:25, 101:7

field [1] - 85:17

fifth [1] - 49:7

Fifth [1] - 84:23

figure [2] - 25:23, 96:7

file [3] - 25:21, 26:2, 57:6

filed [2] - 13:14, 28:12

fill [5] - 40:5, 40:10, 40:17,

69:16, 71:14

filled [1] - 35:4

filling [1] - 40:25

Film [1] - 63:1

film [2] - 63:3, 87:18

films [1] - 101:3

final [1] - 30:16

financial [4] - 64:1, 82:8,

82:10, 95:21

fine [3] - 13:11, 34:9, 37:8

finish [3] - 53:10, 76:22,

92:25

Fiore [1] - 41:4

fire [1] - 95:7

firefighter/paramedic [1] -

66:2

fires [1] - 95:7

firm [10] - 46:10, 46:13, 46:19,

54:17, 55:13, 65:7, 84:9,

88:16, 90:17, 100:22

firmly [1] - 18:9

firms [3] - 51:20, 52:12,

102:11

First [2] - 7:23, 16:3

first [21] - 3:19, 10:19, 13:15,

13:17, 13:24, 16:5, 29:21,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 114 of 130 PageID #:2642
35:6, 37:14, 40:4, 40:5,

40:7, 40:13, 40:14, 40:25,

41:24, 63:24, 75:18, 80:3,

89:15, 102:16

fishing [2] - 80:21, 100:25

fit [1] - 40:15

fits [1] - 15:13

five [4] - 20:14, 56:17, 67:7,

95:22

floor [3] - 61:2, 77:10, 77:11

fly [1] - 100:24

focus [3] - 23:6, 32:10,

101:22

focused [2] - 55:19, 96:9

folk [1] - 101:1

folks [1] - 32:7

follow [10] - 44:15, 45:17,

47:23, 59:15, 59:19, 67:12,

70:6, 74:24, 92:2, 104:21

follow-up [3] - 67:12, 70:6,

74:24

following [8] - 8:20, 65:18,

67:19, 68:10, 70:11, 72:23,

75:6, 75:22

follows [2] - 77:6, 93:16

food [2] - 78:15, 94:17

Force [1] - 61:7

force [3] - 34:11, 63:6, 63:20

foregoing [1] - 106:4

forensic [3] - 4:11, 97:4, 97:5

forget [1] - 18:25

forklifts [1] - 94:6

form [3] - 23:23, 26:20, 73:17

formal [2] - 8:4, 42:4

formed [1] - 19:25

former [1] - 6:18

forming [2] - 104:2, 104:18

foster [1] - 41:4

Foster [1] - 99:5

foundation [2] - 22:12, 32:22

foundational [3] - 19:22,

20:14, 21:12

four [11] - 46:12, 46:24,

47:19, 49:25, 56:11, 83:3,

84:8, 94:2, 96:2, 96:22,

99:22

fourth [2] - 74:1, 74:3

Fox [3] - 64:23, 77:21, 78:20

Francisco [2] - 100:21,

100:23

Frank [2] - 4:2, 42:17

FRANKEL [58] - 1:17, 1:17,

3:13, 3:16, 3:22, 4:21, 4:24,

5:17, 5:24, 6:8, 6:11, 6:20,

7:10, 8:15, 10:14, 11:19,

11:24, 12:17, 13:5, 16:15,

21:21, 21:23, 21:25, 23:14,

24:7, 24:22, 25:3, 25:6,

25:16, 25:19, 32:11, 33:25,

35:16, 35:18, 35:24, 36:10,

36:24, 37:6, 37:8, 37:19,

38:1, 38:5, 38:7, 38:16,

42:19, 67:16, 67:25, 70:9,

70:17, 71:2, 75:3, 75:13,

76:7, 76:14, 76:17, 76:19,

77:2, 93:6

Frankel [5] - 3:11, 28:17,

42:20, 70:16, 72:6

fraud [3] - 20:12, 20:13, 31:19

fraudster [1] - 32:3

fraudulent [4] - 19:17, 30:15,

30:24, 32:3

fraudulently [2] - 27:15, 28:4

free [2] - 49:13, 87:5

freelance [1] - 85:19

freelanced [1] - 87:17

freelances [1] - 79:14

frequent [1] - 50:22

Friday [5] - 13:23, 14:7,

28:19, 66:21, 93:4

friends [1] - 86:4

front [3] - 19:19, 39:8, 40:12

full [3] - 17:14, 46:24, 58:8

fun [1] - 66:22

fundraising [1] - 90:14

furniture [4] - 46:14, 46:25,

91:17, 91:21

furthest [1] - 102:23

G

Gabb [1] - 40:20

gabb [2] - 47:11, 47:14

Gabor [2] - 4:10, 43:9

GABOR [1] - 4:10

Gallagher [1] - 56:14

gallery [1] - 38:19

game [1] - 25:4

Game [1] - 56:2

game-time [1] - 25:4

garden [1] - 96:8

gas [1] - 51:21

GB [1] - 57:4

GE [2] - 80:18, 81:3

general [8] - 8:18, 30:22,

32:13, 61:1, 61:21, 65:5,

9

65:6, 72:8

general's [1] - 101:25

generalized [4] - 24:2, 30:6,

30:10, 33:3

generally [3] - 30:17, 31:10,

102:8

Geneva [2] - 94:12, 99:5

gentleman [1] - 35:12

Gentlemen [3] - 39:5, 41:10,

42:19

genuine [1] - 32:17

Geoffroy [1] - 41:5

Germaine [1] - 86:20

Gibson [3] - 6:13, 6:14, 43:11

Gierke [2] - 41:1, 82:24

girl [1] - 49:4

girlfriend [2] - 51:23, 52:18

girls [1] - 87:4

given [3] - 21:18, 43:22, 93:3

global [1] - 88:10

Gloria [2] - 40:22, 57:20

glove [1] - 96:1

goal [1] - 41:10

golf [1] - 84:10

golly [1] - 100:14

Google [5] - 27:13, 28:13,

89:5, 92:1, 103:12

gosh [1] - 61:20

government [29] - 3:25, 8:11,

8:12, 9:2, 9:5, 9:16, 16:4,

17:8, 17:22, 18:5, 21:7,

22:20, 24:3, 29:22, 30:25,

33:15, 33:19, 36:8, 38:15,

42:14, 48:5, 67:13, 67:24,

69:21, 69:24, 70:6, 70:15,

74:25, 88:13

Government [1] - 59:4

grade [1] - 47:17

grader [1] - 36:5

graduate [4] - 44:8, 47:13,

47:17, 92:11

graduated [3] - 56:12, 83:22,

86:23

graduation [1] - 88:4

grandchildren [2] - 80:21,

80:24

granddaughter[1] - 96:6

grandkids [1] - 49:15

graphic [1] - 96:4

great [2] - 81:23, 93:8

greatly [1] - 21:13

greenhouse [1] - 52:22

grew [1] - 81:21

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 115 of 130 PageID #:2643
gross [4] - 40:23, 77:20,

77:21, 78:4

group [1] - 70:17

groups [1] - 78:15

Grove [2] - 83:1, 90:10

grown [1] - 48:12

guess [12] - 4:16, 6:20, 6:23,

38:14, 57:3, 61:1, 61:10,

62:13, 62:17, 78:11, 81:2,

102:5

guilt [10] - 8:7, 14:10, 15:1,

15:3, 15:11, 15:25, 16:9,

17:1, 18:2, 42:7

guilty [4] - 8:6, 9:16, 16:11,

42:6

guitar [1] - 44:14

guitarist [1] - 44:9

guys [1] - 57:6

H

H-a-r-t-n-e-y [1] - 5:2

H-a-y-a-s-h-i [1] - 62:24

H.D.R [1] - 46:13

Hainesville,Illinois [1] - 88:1

hair [1] - 87:17

half [7] - 44:8, 45:6, 50:10,

52:11, 58:11, 58:14, 80:15

hall [1] - 16:5

hallway [4] - 12:2, 14:2,

14:22, 18:11

hallways [1] - 17:7

hand [4] - 39:23, 77:8, 81:24,

81:25

handed [1] - 19:6

handheld [1] - 43:16

handle [2] - 5:4, 75:14

hands [3] - 42:10, 43:1, 43:14

handwriting [1] - 14:18

Hanover [1] - 82:24

happy [2] - 21:1, 32:12

harbinger[1] - 26:15

hardship [1] - 35:21

hardwood [1] - 91:20

Hartney [23] - 5:1, 5:12,

20:17, 26:13, 27:3, 27:11,

27:13, 27:22, 27:23, 28:16,

29:8, 29:12, 30:3, 30:23,

31:8, 31:16, 31:25, 32:9,

32:15, 33:8, 33:10, 43:10,

43:12

Harwood [1] - 91:11

hate [1] - 36:11

Hayashi [2] - 40:23, 62:24

HBO [1] - 101:3

head [4] - 3:24, 12:3, 30:25,

81:6

headlines [1] - 50:25

health [2] - 54:16, 81:15

hear [8] - 9:25, 33:11, 34:4,

43:3, 43:19, 65:24, 68:15,

73:6

heard [3] - 11:25, 103:15,

103:25

hearing [9] - 16:6, 65:19,

67:20, 68:11, 70:12, 72:24,

75:7, 92:18, 93:15

HEATHER [1] - 1:13

Heather [2] - 3:7, 42:15

Heights [1] - 91:11

heights [1] - 91:20

Heine [2] - 88:16, 89:8

held [1] - 25:9

help [5] - 18:9, 38:12, 45:2,

55:21, 66:8

helped [1] - 62:3

helping [3] - 49:16, 95:8, 95:9

Hematogenics [1] - 98:12

hematology [1] - 98:13

Heraty [3] - 40:22, 54:4, 54:5

herself [1] - 25:12

HGTV [1] - 79:20

hi [1] - 57:20

high [12] - 21:19, 44:7, 53:10,

54:8, 56:12, 59:12, 77:22,

83:22, 87:4, 91:3, 91:24,

96:24

highlights [1] - 18:19

highly [2] - 17:11

hiking [1] - 100:25

Hills [3] - 46:5, 46:17, 47:2

himself [1] - 22:15

Hinsdale [1] - 54:17

hire [4] - 7:25, 8:2, 42:1, 42:3

history [4] - 64:13, 85:16,

90:12, 97:24

hobbies [13] - 44:13, 51:23,

61:8, 64:22, 78:8, 80:21,

83:8, 85:24, 91:25, 94:16,

97:23, 99:14, 100:24

hobby [2] - 46:18, 88:19

Hodge [9] - 36:21, 41:2, 68:2,

68:4, 68:9, 70:14, 75:11,

77:7, 77:9

Hoffer [1] - 56:13

hold [7] - 10:7, 47:14, 57:23,

10

58:2, 60:9, 88:20, 88:22

holds [1] - 58:5

home [31] - 44:16, 44:17,

44:18, 46:16, 48:9, 49:10,

49:15, 49:16, 53:6, 55:1,

58:14, 58:16, 64:12, 66:4,

66:13, 66:19, 66:21, 71:1,

78:6, 78:14, 79:6, 80:18,

81:22, 88:2, 94:2, 94:3,

95:6, 96:6, 98:3, 99:6

homeland [2] - 90:21, 98:20

homemaker [4] - 79:14,

79:16, 80:4, 91:22

homes [3] - 78:1, 95:9, 95:19

Honor [20] - 3:6, 3:10, 5:10,

6:4, 7:7, 7:9, 8:15, 12:23,

16:1, 16:14, 21:5, 26:1,

29:7, 29:18, 36:1, 36:8,

37:18, 37:19, 67:23, 70:7

HONORABLE [1] - 1:10

hop [1] - 77:10

hopefully [2] - 80:23, 104:20

hopping [1] - 104:10

hospital [2] - 58:8, 98:6

Hospital [2] - 83:7, 97:9

hospitals [1] - 62:10

hostesses [1] - 61:2

hotel [1] - 86:13

Hour [1] - 96:10

hour [2] - 76:22, 102:14

hours [2] - 38:12, 66:2

house [12] - 48:25, 50:10,

57:25, 66:7, 81:17, 82:25,

90:11, 90:21, 94:15, 96:23,

98:20, 100:23

housewife [2] - 47:12, 47:21

hurt [1] - 57:5

husband [18] - 47:24, 48:9,

48:20, 55:7, 57:21, 61:4,

66:2, 66:9, 66:11, 79:7,

79:10, 82:6, 85:19, 86:21,

86:25, 87:3, 94:12, 95:18

husband's [2] - 62:7, 95:25

hyperbole [1] - 17:18

I

idea [3] - 17:20, 28:18, 33:20

identification [2] - 14:13,

71:25

ILLINOIS [1] - 1:1

Illinois [22] - 1:6, 1:15, 1:18,

1:21, 1:25, 44:5, 46:9, 53:5,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 116 of 130 PageID #:2644
57:21, 57:25, 58:9, 63:9,

64:12, 77:21, 80:13, 86:20,

86:22, 88:3, 90:10, 94:12,

94:19, 99:5

imagine [1] - 18:24

immediately [1] - 11:4

impartial [1] - 41:11

impeachment [1] - 7:2

implementing [1] - 90:3

implying [1] - 21:14

important [6] - 39:15, 59:14,

71:12, 71:13, 103:6

importantly [1] - 103:23

improper [2] - 7:3, 33:1

IN [2] - 2:6, 3:18

inappropriate [1] - 33:4

include [1] - 97:23

included [1] - 97:6

includes [2] - 10:21, 104:10

including [4] - 9:13, 9:23,

10:20, 64:20

income [1] - 45:4

indicated [1] - 12:18

indicating [2] - 8:23, 19:11

indication [1] - 16:4

indictment [7] - 7:22, 8:4,

16:7, 41:22, 42:4

individuals [4] - 31:20, 31:21,

32:19, 32:20

industrial [1] - 94:5

industry [1] - 87:18

infer [2] - 10:2, 18:20

inference [4] - 18:14, 18:21,

28:3, 30:18

infinitely [1] - 23:24

infinity [1] - 78:6

influence [3] - 17:2, 72:9,

72:10

influenced [1] - 17:3

information [6] - 16:3, 43:21,

71:25, 89:4, 92:4, 97:16

informed [2] - 73:9, 74:4

initial [1] - 23:19

injunction [2] - 27:16, 30:15

injury [1] - 55:15

innocence [1] - 9:18

innocent [1] - 9:11

inquired [1] - 74:9

instance [4] - 27:18, 28:21,

29:25, 30:4

instances [7] - 22:5, 22:21,

23:16, 27:22, 27:23, 31:8,

31:16

instead [2] - 20:14, 74:1

Institute [1] - 46:9

institutional [1] - 100:9

instruct [3] - 9:7, 9:24, 103:11

instructed [3] - 12:4, 102:20,

103:1

instruction [7] - 9:10, 10:9,

11:15, 12:1, 15:5, 59:15,

59:19

instructions [5] - 8:18, 8:19,

8:20, 103:5, 104:20

instructor[1] - 101:16

instrument [1] - 100:20

insurance [5] - 57:1, 57:2,

57:3, 95:6, 95:8

intend [11] - 4:17, 9:9, 15:21,

20:8, 20:13, 21:4, 29:13,

31:14, 31:15, 31:17, 72:1

intended [1] - 19:11

intends [3] - 19:24, 20:23,

27:21

intensive [2] - 58:9, 58:10

intent [2] - 8:2, 42:2

interact [1] - 103:5

interactions [1] - 20:1

interesting [1] - 87:11

interior [4] - 37:3, 85:16,

85:17, 86:10

intern [3] - 46:12, 46:20,

46:25

internal [1] - 82:12

internet [1] - 53:21

Internet [9] - 10:15, 11:9,

11:11, 45:18, 45:22, 50:1,

50:2, 84:11, 86:1

interview [2] - 14:7, 19:7

interviewed [1] - 28:24

intimidate [1] - 15:6

introduce [4] - 20:7, 20:24,

42:12, 51:6

inventory [1] - 95:7

investigate [1] - 103:16

Investigation [1] - 58:23

investigation [1] - 11:12

involve [1] - 89:11

involved [1] - 10:21

IRA's [2] - 64:1, 94:10

irony [1] - 20:16

Israel [1] - 97:10

issue [10] - 19:14, 20:5,

22:16, 22:18, 31:13, 35:9,

66:1, 72:18, 73:10, 73:19

issues [3] - 38:20, 81:16, 92:4

11

IT [1] - 53:18

itself [2] - 14:8, 14:25

J

J.D [1] - 64:14

Jackson [1] - 1:18

jail [3] - 14:2, 14:23, 15:16

James [4] - 6:1, 41:2, 43:11,

88:1

Jazeera [1] - 101:6

jazz [2] - 101:1

Jeff [3] - 3:7, 42:16, 99:5

Jeffrey [4] - 5:11, 26:13, 41:4,

43:11

JEFFREY [1] - 1:14

Jermaine [1] - 41:1

Jessica [2] - 54:13, 54:14

jet [1] - 99:8

Jewish [1] - 37:22

job [7] - 36:22, 50:16, 53:14,

57:10, 91:16, 94:21, 97:5

jobs [3] - 58:4, 63:25, 97:5

Joffrey [1] - 90:16

John [3] - 40:23, 64:14, 77:21

join [2] - 65:17, 68:9

joint [1] - 32:14

Joseph [1] - 98:7

Journal [1] - 84:14

Judge [30] - 3:13, 3:17, 3:25,

6:11, 6:20, 10:14, 13:8,

13:16, 13:22, 15:19, 16:15,

19:9, 21:21, 23:14, 24:7,

24:14, 25:19, 26:12, 31:2,

31:7, 32:11, 35:24, 36:13,

36:25, 38:23, 39:6, 67:16,

71:2, 75:17, 76:10

judge [4] - 29:3, 33:25, 59:7,

72:20

Julia [2] - 54:14, 96:4

junior [1] - 5:11

junky [1] - 94:17

Jurgovan [4] - 40:24, 79:5,

82:1, 82:6

juror [17] - 35:6, 35:9, 36:3,

36:20, 40:4, 40:6, 40:7,

40:9, 40:13, 40:16, 43:16,

71:7, 72:16, 75:13, 93:8,

103:7

JUROR [1] - 93:20

jurors [11] - 7:17, 10:20, 12:2,

12:14, 12:15, 25:10, 25:14,

35:4, 39:22, 40:15, 76:11

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 117 of 130 PageID #:2645
jury [47] - 3:20, 7:17, 8:17,

10:9, 11:21, 17:20, 18:9,

19:19, 21:2, 25:10, 28:2,

29:10, 30:5, 30:10, 30:17,

31:5, 33:10, 34:5, 34:9,

39:8, 39:10, 39:13, 39:15,

39:18, 40:5, 41:11, 43:22,

71:22, 72:7, 72:8, 72:17,

74:4, 74:12, 74:13, 74:20,

76:12, 76:13, 76:22, 76:24,

77:10, 77:14, 93:4, 103:22,

103:23, 104:11, 105:1

JURY [1] - 1:9

justice [3] - 35:7, 50:13, 58:3

Justin [2] - 40:25, 82:24

K

Kane [2] - 95:23, 96:13

Karen [4] - 4:20, 40:21, 43:9,

53:5

keep [11] - 10:4, 11:16, 15:23,

47:14, 66:22, 69:2, 70:3,

74:19, 75:16, 93:2, 103:24

Kellog [1] - 52:9

Kellogg [1] - 51:16

Kerr [2] - 5:11, 43:11

key [1] - 21:5

kids [11] - 36:22, 38:12,

48:15, 48:19, 53:8, 56:15,

66:4, 68:21, 70:18, 79:12,

85:21

Kimberly [1] - 41:4

kind [6] - 6:24, 16:14, 17:21,

30:5, 56:15, 90:16

kindergartner[1] - 36:5

king [1] - 83:11

kitchen [1] - 62:4

knit [1] - 90:20

Kosbab [10] - 4:20, 19:5,

26:11, 26:12, 27:20, 28:2,

28:22, 30:18, 34:1, 43:9

KOSBAB [1] - 4:20

Kosbab's [1] - 33:9

Krista [1] - 39:12

KRISTA [1] - 1:24

Kristen [2] - 41:2, 90:10

L

laboratory [2] - 97:6, 98:13

Ladies [3] - 39:5, 41:9, 42:19

LaGrange [4] - 54:6, 54:11,

54:24, 54:25

laid [1] - 63:6

Lake [4] - 77:21, 78:20, 88:2,

98:8

lake [1] - 100:5

Lakeview [2] - 96:21, 98:4

large [1] - 100:22

Larry [5] - 4:1, 14:14, 41:2,

43:8, 75:11

LaSalle [5] - 79:10, 80:14,

80:17, 81:11, 82:7

last [21] - 5:13, 8:19, 19:9,

26:8, 28:23, 28:24, 32:24,

36:25, 43:9, 44:25, 45:4,

46:24, 51:7, 65:1, 67:10,

67:11, 82:25, 84:8, 88:2,

96:1, 100:6

late [1] - 17:13

law [37] - 8:21, 9:8, 15:25,

19:13, 20:2, 21:3, 21:13,

21:14, 21:15, 22:7, 22:12,

22:17, 24:11, 39:10, 54:17,

55:14, 55:15, 58:2, 58:19,

59:1, 59:6, 59:8, 59:12,

59:16, 59:17, 59:20, 60:6,

60:7, 64:13, 67:6, 73:20,

77:14, 82:14, 88:16, 92:8,

92:20, 100:22

lawful [1] - 22:7

Lawn [2] - 58:9, 64:11

lawyers [10] - 11:13, 12:1,

41:15, 42:11, 42:24, 65:17,

92:16, 102:21, 103:1,

103:14

laying [1] - 32:21

lazy [1] - 49:11

learned [1] - 27:13

learning [1] - 11:8

least [2] - 27:25, 52:6

leaves [2] - 66:3, 105:1

led [1] - 88:10

ledgers [1] - 6:18

leeway [1] - 13:7

left [8] - 14:17, 19:4, 40:8,

40:14, 42:16, 58:11, 66:7,

88:3

legal [4] - 55:18, 55:20, 61:14,

100:21

legit [1] - 36:18

legitimate [1] - 30:9

legitimize [1] - 29:16

lender [1] - 85:6

length [2] - 12:20, 19:16

lent [1] - 85:3

12

letter [1] - 43:21

leukemia [1] - 97:3

level [1] - 24:2

Liberal [1] - 86:23

librarian [1] - 96:5

license [2] - 57:23, 71:23

life [3] - 69:4, 96:7, 96:8

lifetime [1] - 58:18

lift [1] - 94:6

light [1] - 16:12

limine [1] - 19:10

LIMINE [2] - 2:6, 3:18

limit [1] - 13:11

limited [1] - 15:23

line [2] - 92:1, 101:6

link [1] - 31:8

links [1] - 86:3

Lisa [1] - 78:4

list [8] - 3:19, 6:9, 11:5, 43:2,

43:4, 43:5, 43:13, 71:23

listen [10] - 11:6, 40:19, 43:4,

64:22, 78:9, 87:7, 87:8,

89:1, 94:20, 101:1

listening [3] - 49:25, 87:9,

94:16

literally [1] - 18:11

litigation [3] - 64:16, 100:16,

101:20

live [33] - 46:5, 46:16, 47:12,

49:23, 50:5, 51:13, 51:22,

53:5, 53:8, 54:5, 54:23,

56:21, 57:20, 60:22, 62:24,

69:7, 77:21, 79:5, 80:12,

82:24, 84:5, 84:10, 85:13,

86:20, 86:21, 88:1, 90:10,

90:11, 91:19, 94:1, 94:15,

96:21, 100:23

lived [20] - 46:5, 46:8, 51:14,

54:6, 54:25, 56:10, 56:11,

61:19, 64:11, 79:6, 81:19,

81:21, 85:14, 85:15, 86:21,

91:11, 95:19, 99:5, 100:6

lives [2] - 67:6, 96:23

living [12] - 44:18, 45:7,

47:24, 48:9, 48:17, 49:5,

52:18, 53:16, 55:8, 78:6,

96:6, 100:5

LLP [1] - 88:16

lobby [1] - 103:3

local [8] - 11:22, 46:13, 54:20,

55:22, 55:24, 59:6, 90:20,

99:15

located [1] - 57:24

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 118 of 130 PageID #:2646
Loftus [1] - 100:16

Logan [1] - 51:13

logistics [1] - 96:1

look [4] - 10:15, 29:1, 34:17,

84:21

looking [3] - 11:21, 15:23,

27:14

loop [2] - 85:14, 86:6

lose [1] - 37:4

loss [2] - 95:7, 95:8

lost [1] - 44:17

loudly [2] - 43:18, 82:22

lounge [1] - 87:2

love [2] - 58:19

low [2] - 21:11, 21:18

Loyola [8] - 63:7, 63:10,

63:11, 63:17, 73:13, 91:13,

91:14, 92:21

Ltd [1] - 6:19

Lucy [1] - 41:6

lunch [3] - 28:10, 76:20,

102:14

Lundy [1] - 51:20

lymphoma [1] - 97:4

Lynch [3] - 84:9, 84:15, 85:5

M

M.D [1] - 96:25

machine [2] - 51:4, 62:11

machining [1] - 100:9

machinist [1] - 91:4

magic [2] - 25:11, 65:22

Magnet [1] - 96:1

mail [2] - 48:24, 49:1

main [1] - 9:5

maintenance [6] - 48:2, 48:3,

48:5, 48:8, 56:14, 77:24

major [4] - 64:21, 88:18,

99:15, 101:4

makeup [1] - 87:18

malpractice [1] - 64:18

manage [1] - 78:1

management [5] - 77:23,

77:25, 90:13, 99:7, 100:11

manager [8] - 44:11, 61:1,

61:6, 61:21, 83:3, 83:13,

94:8, 94:24

managers [1] - 61:2

Mandell [1] - 41:7

March [1] - 74:6

Marcie [2] - 41:1, 85:13

Marcus [1] - 87:17

Marilyn [2] - 4:4, 43:8

mark [4] - 3:11, 41:4, 42:22,

96:21

MARK [1] - 1:20

market [1] - 63:11

marketers [1] - 102:9

Marketing [1] - 60:24

marklund [1] - 94:12

marriage [2] - 31:9, 78:5

married [19] - 26:18, 26:19,

34:7, 44:12, 46:16, 47:21,

49:25, 51:22, 56:14, 61:4,

78:4, 83:5, 84:10, 85:21,

90:19, 99:11, 100:14

Marshal [1] - 64:14

massacring [1] - 51:7

master [1] - 96:25

Master's [7] - 46:7, 46:22,

46:23, 58:7, 90:12, 91:15,

101:11

material [1] - 89:17

materials [1] - 11:12

matter [6] - 30:21, 30:22,

59:12, 76:24, 100:18, 106:5

matters [2] - 10:8, 55:20

mattresses [1] - 46:15

McDonald's [3] - 57:13, 99:9,

99:20

McGladrey [3] - 84:8, 84:16,

85:4

McHenry [4] - 100:7, 100:8,

101:12, 101:17

McKenzie [3] - 88:9, 88:15,

89:8

McShain [3] - 1:13, 3:7, 42:15

MCSHAIN [16] - 3:6, 12:23,

12:25, 36:1, 36:8, 37:9,

37:18, 38:15, 42:15, 67:14,

67:23, 70:7, 70:15, 75:1,

76:10, 92:23

mean [9] - 11:20, 14:4, 15:7,

15:15, 23:5, 59:11, 59:25,

60:4, 60:9

means [1] - 10:7

meant [3] - 16:12, 18:4, 18:16

mechanical [1] - 51:15

mechanics [1] - 94:7

med [3] - 74:14, 98:15, 98:16

med/mal [1] - 65:1

media [1] - 10:22

medical [14] - 45:9, 45:10,

50:15, 61:5, 62:8, 63:7,

63:9, 64:18, 73:13, 91:13,

13

92:11, 92:21, 97:11

Medical [1] - 97:10

medicine [2] - 91:14, 96:25

meetings [1] - 16:23

Meijer's [1] - 61:6

member [1] - 97:13

members [1] - 10:20

memory [1] - 10:5

men [1] - 70:3

mention [4] - 24:16, 32:7,

34:12, 75:25

mentioned [2] - 52:12, 104:14

Mercantile [1] - 55:9

Merrill [3] - 84:9, 84:15, 85:5

Messinger [1] - 95:5

met [2] - 39:9, 39:10

Meyer [3] - 4:1, 14:14, 43:8

MEYER [1] - 4:1

Michael [5] - 5:19, 6:6, 6:8,

43:7, 43:10

Michaelson [1] - 95:5

Michelle [2] - 41:5, 49:4

microphone [9] - 43:17,

43:18, 47:15, 65:22, 68:14,

73:5, 77:8, 81:24

middle [2] - 12:11, 55:11

might [13] - 4:22, 4:24, 11:21,

17:20, 30:5, 36:10, 38:3,

43:3, 57:8, 68:2, 73:10,

74:16, 98:3

Mike [1] - 4:1

millennium [1] - 94:8

mind [6] - 11:17, 18:1, 49:15,

72:19, 72:20, 103:24

minds [2] - 58:19, 83:11

minimal [1] - 33:12

minimum [1] - 10:4

minus [1] - 60:12

minute [3] - 8:10, 26:2,

102:15

minutes [7] - 12:23, 12:25,

13:5, 13:10, 50:10, 56:17,

66:24

misconduct [2] - 22:21, 23:16

miss [1] - 74:2

missed [1] - 98:3

Missouri [1] - 79:13

mix [2] - 83:8, 102:9

mobile [1] - 78:8

mom [5] - 38:10, 38:12, 66:7,

67:2, 67:7

moment [2] - 82:1, 92:17

money [1] - 85:3

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 119 of 130 PageID #:2647
Montgomery [3] - 5:1, 43:9,

94:18

month [1] - 51:17

months [5] - 85:14, 94:22,

94:23, 96:23, 98:13

morning [10] - 3:6, 3:9, 3:10,

3:13, 3:14, 28:9, 42:19,

66:13, 70:22, 78:10

mornings [3] - 56:17, 66:4,

87:8

Morton [1] - 90:10

most [5] - 39:15, 67:3, 83:9,

92:1, 98:1

mostly [3] - 89:3, 97:23,

99:18

mother [6] - 47:18, 66:23,

67:5, 67:6, 91:3, 91:22

mother-in-law [1] - 67:6

motion [3] - 19:4, 19:10,

20:16

MOTIONS [2] - 2:6, 3:18

motions [3] - 13:14, 15:14,

25:21

motorcycles [1] - 80:22

mountain [1] - 88:6

move [1] - 74:3

moved [3] - 38:11, 55:10,

56:21

movie [1] - 58:18

movies [1] - 78:12

moving [1] - 54:23

Moyer's [1] - 86:3

MR [120] - 1:14, 1:17, 1:20,

3:9, 3:10, 3:13, 3:16, 3:22,

3:25, 4:7, 4:10, 4:13, 4:15,

4:21, 4:24, 5:1, 5:10, 5:14,

5:16, 5:17, 5:19, 5:21, 5:24,

6:1, 6:4, 6:7, 6:8, 6:11, 6:13,

6:16, 6:20, 6:23, 7:4, 7:5,

7:6, 7:9, 7:10, 8:12, 8:14,

8:15, 10:14, 11:19, 11:24,

12:7, 12:17, 13:2, 13:5,

13:7, 13:16, 13:22, 16:1,

16:3, 16:15, 19:9, 21:5,

21:21, 21:23, 21:25, 22:2,

23:3, 23:5, 23:9, 23:14,

24:7, 24:14, 24:22, 24:25,

25:3, 25:6, 25:7, 25:16,

25:19, 26:1, 26:6, 26:8,

26:12, 27:9, 27:12, 28:8,

28:23, 29:2, 29:3, 29:5,

29:7, 31:7, 32:11, 32:12,

33:25, 34:14, 35:15, 35:16,

35:18, 35:24, 36:10, 36:24,

37:6, 37:8, 37:19, 38:1,

38:5, 38:7, 38:16, 42:19,

67:16, 67:25, 70:9, 70:17,

71:2, 75:3, 75:13, 75:17,

76:7, 76:8, 76:9, 76:14,

76:17, 76:19, 77:2, 93:3,

93:6

MS [18] - 1:13, 1:24, 3:6,

12:23, 12:25, 36:1, 36:8,

37:9, 37:18, 38:15, 42:15,

67:14, 67:23, 70:7, 70:15,

75:1, 76:10, 92:23

MSNBC [1] - 97:25

MTV [1] - 58:20

Mulcahy [2] - 4:1, 43:7

MULCAHY [1] - 4:1

municipal [1] - 59:5

murder [4] - 7:25, 8:2, 41:25,

42:2

music [12] - 37:15, 44:11,

44:21, 45:1, 45:4, 50:1,

51:23, 58:17, 83:8, 87:10,

94:17, 101:1

must [11] - 10:19, 11:2, 11:5,

11:10, 22:15, 30:20, 33:14,

59:15, 103:11, 103:18,

103:24

N

name [26] - 5:13, 36:4, 40:19,

42:15, 42:20, 44:24, 51:13,

53:5, 54:5, 56:10, 57:20,

60:22, 62:24, 64:11, 79:5,

80:12, 82:24, 84:5, 85:13,

86:20, 88:1, 91:11, 94:1,

95:18, 100:5, 103:15

names [7] - 4:21, 4:25, 32:7,

40:2, 43:9, 51:7, 103:14

nature [1] - 78:11

Navy [1] - 69:25

NCIS [1] - 90:22

near [2] - 46:8, 80:13

nearby [1] - 66:25

nears [1] - 91:17

necessarily [1] - 29:15

need [11] - 11:15, 17:16, 26:4,

30:15, 32:7, 35:8, 35:10,

36:11, 37:14, 54:22, 97:16

needed [1] - 93:2

needs [4] - 26:3, 30:12, 70:18,

76:24

neglected [1] - 82:6

14

neighborhood [2] - 96:22,

100:17

Neiman [1] - 87:17

neonatal [1] - 58:10

network [2] - 58:18, 94:17

never [4] - 9:18, 20:20, 20:21

new [2] - 17:9, 63:14

New [5] - 64:24, 85:23, 90:23,

97:24, 101:5

news [44] - 10:11, 10:16,

11:6, 11:20, 45:16, 45:17,

45:22, 45:23, 47:4, 50:1,

50:22, 50:24, 51:25, 53:20,

54:20, 54:21, 55:22, 62:12,

62:15, 63:14, 63:15, 64:23,

83:9, 84:11, 84:13, 85:21,

85:23, 85:24, 86:1, 86:4,

89:3, 89:5, 89:6, 90:20,

92:1, 92:2, 94:18, 96:10,

97:24, 99:15, 101:6

News [2] - 79:19, 96:10

next [15] - 35:19, 36:3, 36:20,

37:2, 37:12, 37:21, 38:10,

42:21, 49:24, 56:9, 60:21,

77:8, 79:4, 87:25, 92:24

nine [1] - 83:20

noise [1] - 77:13

non [1] - 40:19

non-alphabetical [1] - 40:19

none [1] - 20:19

noon [3] - 76:22, 76:25,

102:13

Nordstrom's [1] - 87:17

north [4] - 12:15, 67:4, 84:5,

102:24

North [1] - 98:7

NORTHERN [1] - 1:1

northside [1] - 52:23

Northwestern [1] - 97:8

not-for-profit [1] - 69:20

note [1] - 11:16

notes [1] - 10:5

nothing [10] - 16:17, 17:2,

17:17, 23:7, 25:2, 25:3,

72:2, 99:18, 103:15, 103:25

notice [1] - 22:1

NPR [7] - 52:1, 85:22, 87:7,

87:8, 87:9, 89:1, 89:3

number [12] - 26:18, 29:12,

40:6, 40:9, 40:13, 40:16,

41:3, 41:6, 43:16, 76:2

Number [13] - 35:6, 35:12,

35:19, 36:3, 36:19, 36:20,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 120 of 130 PageID #:2648
37:1, 37:2, 37:10, 37:12,

37:20, 37:21, 38:10

NUNES [1] - 1:20

nurse [6] - 57:23, 58:6, 58:9,

58:10, 83:15, 96:4

nurses [1] - 62:11

nursing [2] - 58:6, 58:11

O

o'clock [5] - 1:7, 54:21, 69:14,

70:23

Oak [6] - 58:8, 64:11, 86:20,

87:3, 94:9, 94:25

oath [1] - 39:19

objection [15] - 8:11, 35:14,

36:7, 37:6, 37:9, 37:17,

38:14, 38:15, 38:16, 67:22,

70:14, 76:5, 92:22, 93:3,

93:12

objections [3] - 9:24, 10:1,

10:2

obstruction [1] - 17:21

obviously [12] - 13:22, 15:1,

17:5, 19:19, 20:10, 24:19,

35:8, 63:13, 67:9, 71:7,

71:11, 101:16

occasion [2] - 55:16, 63:16

occasionally [2] - 55:17,

97:25

OF [3] - 1:1, 1:3, 1:9

offered [2] - 27:3, 29:8

OFFICE [1] - 1:13

office [10] - 26:3, 45:9, 45:10,

48:18, 48:21, 48:23, 51:16,

52:10, 94:19, 99:13

officer [3] - 59:21, 60:7, 60:8

officers [2] - 59:8, 59:13

Official [1] - 106:7

OFFICIAL [1] - 1:23

Ohio [1] - 88:17

oil [1] - 51:21

old [13] - 22:1, 35:13, 49:3,

49:5, 49:8, 49:10, 49:25,

58:5, 64:21, 81:11, 94:14,

96:6

older [1] - 84:21

oldest [2] - 48:18, 79:12

OLLER [1] - 6:4

on-site [1] - 88:12

once [4] - 29:22, 71:25, 79:18,

104:15

one [66] - 5:1, 5:5, 5:20, 8:8,

9:12, 14:18, 16:24, 18:12,

18:20, 19:24, 20:18, 25:4,

25:8, 25:10, 25:15, 25:18,

29:3, 31:14, 33:13, 34:6,

34:10, 34:13, 35:6, 35:19,

36:25, 39:10, 39:15, 39:16,

40:18, 42:8, 43:15, 45:8,

45:10, 45:22, 48:18, 49:9,

49:25, 53:18, 54:8, 55:22,

56:12, 60:5, 61:3, 66:13,

68:3, 73:24, 74:3, 74:5,

75:13, 76:3, 76:4, 76:16,

78:6, 91:22, 93:18, 96:23,

99:11, 99:15, 102:14,

102:24, 104:1

one-week [1] - 74:5

ones [5] - 9:22, 38:22, 38:25,

48:19, 104:21

online [1] - 28:13

open [13] - 11:17, 24:15,

35:21, 41:15, 65:18, 67:19,

68:10, 70:11, 72:23, 75:6,

77:5, 93:14, 103:24

opening [10] - 8:25, 9:1, 9:3,

12:20, 12:22, 24:9, 24:17,

24:19, 24:22, 34:12

openings [1] - 13:9

opens [3] - 17:5, 18:23, 19:2

operas [1] - 50:3

operations [1] - 81:7

operator [1] - 51:4

opine [6] - 19:12, 20:2, 22:12,

27:4, 31:22, 34:8

opinion [12] - 8:23, 10:8,

20:1, 20:15, 21:12, 23:23,

24:1, 26:13, 26:21, 31:1,

32:20

opinions [2] - 104:3, 104:18

opponent [1] - 30:19

opportunity [1] - 9:3

opposite [1] - 66:5

option [1] - 41:18

order [13] - 8:24, 15:14, 26:2,

26:9, 29:15, 32:24, 40:3,

40:19, 58:19, 73:21, 77:14

orders [1] - 27:14

organic [1] - 52:21

organization [1] - 69:20

organizations [2] - 37:22,

90:18

orientation [8] - 73:15, 73:16,

73:17, 73:20, 73:23, 74:21,

92:14, 93:1

15

originally [1] - 7:6

Orland [4] - 46:5, 46:16, 47:2,

57:20

orthopedic [1] - 80:16

otherwise [5] - 15:1, 20:16,

30:6, 30:8, 74:8

Ottawa [1] - 80:13

ought [1] - 15:3

outdoor [1] - 100:24

outlet [1] - 97:24

outlets [1] - 97:25

outside [12] - 10:11, 21:1,

49:10, 65:19, 67:20, 68:11,

70:12, 72:24, 75:7, 78:14,

92:18, 103:5

overall [1] - 71:20

overcome [2] - 9:14, 21:13

overseeing [1] - 61:2

overview [1] - 11:25

own [42] - 11:14, 20:6, 37:3,

44:16, 44:17, 44:23, 47:2,

47:3, 48:9, 50:4, 50:6, 50:7,

50:8, 53:6, 55:1, 55:3,

56:19, 56:20, 57:21, 58:14,

61:17, 64:12, 78:20, 78:21,

79:6, 80:17, 80:18, 85:18,

86:6, 86:7, 86:8, 86:10,

86:22, 87:1, 90:11, 91:21,

95:18, 98:3, 99:6

owned [8] - 35:21, 44:10,

55:4, 82:25, 85:18, 87:13,

88:2, 94:3

owner [1] - 44:11

owns [4] - 44:10, 44:20,

44:25, 91:20

P

p.m [1] - 73:18

PAGE [1] - 2:3

page [1] - 10:23

paid [1] - 15:21

paint [1] - 15:5

Pajamas [1] - 87:2

pancake [1] - 57:25

panel [10] - 39:24, 65:20,

67:21, 68:12, 70:13, 72:13,

72:25, 75:8, 92:19, 93:16

paper [1] - 16:24

papers [1] - 11:22

paperwork [2] - 28:8, 57:7

paralegal [1] - 54:17

parallels [1] - 20:22

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 121 of 130 PageID #:2649
parameters [1] - 89:24

pardon [1] - 79:22

parents [8] - 46:17, 47:2,

50:5, 51:1, 66:25, 90:11,

91:1, 91:20

Park [6] - 57:20, 57:25, 79:5,

82:24, 86:20, 87:3

part [13] - 6:20, 14:5, 19:18,

20:10, 46:25, 60:4, 74:1,

79:14, 80:5, 95:23, 96:14,

99:12, 101:16

part-time [2] - 95:23, 96:14

participant [1] - 18:7

participating [1] - 104:16

particular[7] - 14:13, 31:9,

45:19, 45:23, 84:13, 86:1,

92:3

parties [5] - 11:13, 72:4,

102:21, 103:1, 104:4

parties' [1] - 9:5

partner [2] - 19:15, 100:15

partners [1] - 64:17

parts [1] - 71:21

passage [1] - 70:25

passed [1] - 25:11

past [8] - 12:1, 44:10, 79:9,

84:6, 86:25, 91:12, 95:19,

102:10

Pate [1] - 41:6

pathologist [1] - 97:4

pathology [4] - 97:2, 97:5,

97:7, 97:9

patients [1] - 83:16

Patricia [1] - 40:20

pattern [1] - 9:10

pay [2] - 10:5, 37:5

paycheck [1] - 45:3

paying [2] - 93:6, 93:10

payment [1] - 6:18

payments [3] - 6:24, 6:25,

50:19

PBS [2] - 85:22, 89:1

peaceful [1] - 24:10

peacefulness [1] - 24:24

pediatric [1] - 58:9

pellets [1] - 80:19

pending [2] - 21:16, 59:1

people [8] - 10:20, 17:7, 32:4,

50:20, 60:1, 67:3, 71:22,

104:17

per [2] - 29:16, 92:11

Perconte [2] - 3:7, 42:16

PERCONTE [37] - 1:14, 3:9,

3:25, 4:7, 4:10, 4:13, 4:15,

5:1, 6:23, 7:5, 8:12, 12:7,

13:2, 13:7, 13:16, 13:22,

19:9, 22:2, 23:3, 23:5, 23:9,

24:14, 24:25, 25:7, 26:12,

27:9, 27:12, 28:8, 28:23,

29:2, 31:7, 32:12, 34:14,

35:15, 75:17, 76:9, 93:3

peremptory [2] - 72:10, 76:2

performing [1] - 93:18

perhaps [3] - 19:14, 35:9,

76:4

period [1] - 97:6

Perlin [2] - 40:21, 51:13

permitted [1] - 18:6

person [6] - 7:24, 14:17,

26:17, 41:25, 67:5, 77:9

person's [1] - 40:8

personal [1] - 55:15

persons [1] - 43:3

perspective [1] - 12:15

pharmaceutical [1] - 88:8

Pharmaceuticals [1] - 88:7

pharmacy [1] - 80:5

phone [2] - 66:20, 74:21

phonetic [1] - 64:19

photographer[3] - 63:8,

63:10, 63:12

photography [4] - 63:1, 63:3,

63:4, 63:11

photography,film [1] - 63:4

physician [5] - 45:13, 97:1,

97:2, 97:12, 97:19

pick [2] - 68:22, 69:12

picked [4] - 103:7, 103:22,

103:23, 104:10

picking [2] - 39:7, 39:13

picks [1] - 70:24

pickup [2] - 69:13, 71:19

piece [2] - 22:22, 49:14

pieces [1] - 16:24

pilot [3] - 99:9, 99:10, 99:21

place [1] - 16:10

Plaintiff [2] - 1:4, 1:13

plan [5] - 18:24, 23:1, 24:3,

27:8, 75:17

planner [3] - 64:2, 82:9, 82:10

plastic [1] - 80:19

plastics [3] - 56:13, 80:18,

81:3

play [1] - 27:5

player [2] - 88:20, 88:22

playing [1] - 44:13

16

plenty [1] - 18:4

plus [2] - 60:12, 71:18

point [8] - 19:16, 22:8, 22:10,

29:21, 46:20, 65:8, 74:13,

82:14

pointed [1] - 15:14

poker [2] - 88:20, 88:22

politics [1] - 64:25

pool [4] - 35:11, 71:22, 72:1,

72:7

Portlandia [1] - 101:2

position [6] - 29:7, 33:6, 34:7,

35:25, 36:1, 95:23

positions [1] - 85:1

possible [1] - 104:3

possibly [2] - 55:21, 76:6

post [4] - 48:18, 48:21, 48:23,

101:7

posting [2] - 10:10, 10:22

posts [2] - 104:12

potential [3] - 26:15, 43:2,

43:6

potentially [6] - 4:20, 6:17,

7:9, 21:15, 21:25, 23:11

power [1] - 51:21

PR [1] - 63:12

practice [8] - 55:14, 55:15,

64:15, 64:18, 65:6, 82:14,

89:16, 97:4

practiced [2] - 85:17, 97:7

practices [1] - 101:20

practitioner[1] - 65:8

pre [1] - 72:20

pre-judge [1] - 72:20

prefer [2] - 55:23, 62:16

prejudice [3] - 21:9, 21:19,

22:22

prejudicial [1] - 17:5

preliminary [2] - 8:18, 75:18

preparing [1] - 89:11

presence [3] - 21:1, 93:15,

100:22

present [5] - 9:4, 9:6, 29:14,

81:22, 98:7

presentation [1] - 23:19

presenting [2] - 21:6, 21:7

preset [1] - 13:11

presiding [1] - 39:6

presumed [1] - 9:11

presumption [1] - 9:12

pretend [1] - 43:17

pretty [5] - 64:15, 83:12, 96:9,

99:14, 101:8

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 122 of 130 PageID #:2650
previous [2] - 16:8, 78:5

primarily [2] - 97:21, 102:11

primary [1] - 96:10

print [4] - 16:24, 17:16, 85:22,

97:24

printed [3] - 14:17, 16:17,

16:21

Printer's [1] - 85:15

printer's [1] - 86:8

private [1] - 66:4

privately [1] - 41:13

probative [7] - 17:4, 17:11,

21:11, 22:8, 22:19, 34:2,

34:11

problem [2] - 17:24, 17:25

proceeding [4] - 27:14, 30:5,

30:19, 30:21

PROCEEDINGS [1] - 1:9

proceedings [7] - 26:23,

31:10, 31:25, 77:5, 93:14,

105:3, 106:5

process [1] - 58:3

processing [1] - 50:19

produce [2] - 9:19, 28:9

Products [1] - 88:9

profession [3] - 57:23, 58:4,

59:11

professional [1] - 88:19

professionals [1] - 54:16

professions [1] - 60:2

profiles [1] - 52:22

profit [2] - 69:20, 90:17

program [3] - 53:22, 91:15,

93:2

programming [2] - 101:3,

101:4

programs [10] - 50:2, 52:3,

55:25, 61:11, 61:14, 83:10,

88:14, 98:18, 99:17, 100:12

progressive [1] - 47:5

promises [1] - 32:5

pronouns [3] - 33:3, 33:18,

33:19

proof [1] - 9:9

proper [1] - 20:25

property [3] - 77:23, 77:25,

78:1

propose [2] - 7:16, 8:17

proposing [3] - 13:20, 18:15,

18:19

prosecution [1] - 29:12

prospective [1] - 35:4

protection [1] - 101:24

provable [1] - 30:8

prove [7] - 7:2, 9:18, 20:13,

22:21, 27:19, 27:24

proved [1] - 30:1

provided [1] - 14:13

provides [1] - 54:15

proving [4] - 9:17, 20:12,

22:6, 29:16

prowling [1] - 17:6

pull [5] - 25:15, 25:18, 33:23,

36:17, 38:8

puppies [1] - 78:7

purchasing [1] - 78:17

purpose [1] - 8:9

purposes [1] - 71:13

push [1] - 76:22

put [19] - 12:10, 15:21, 19:14,

20:4, 20:6, 22:18, 23:14,

23:15, 23:17, 24:11, 26:10,

30:23, 33:16, 33:17, 35:6,

38:18, 48:24, 62:4, 68:17

puzzles [1] - 79:17

Q

Queens [1] - 83:12

questionaire [1] - 68:18

questioning [5] - 7:18, 36:17,

36:19, 38:9, 41:9

questionnaire [2] - 65:15,

73:9

questionnaires [2] - 34:16,

35:4

questions [35] - 8:21, 9:23,

10:7, 14:8, 15:24, 19:22,

20:14, 21:12, 23:2, 24:5,

27:6, 28:14, 28:17, 28:18,

30:8, 30:23, 33:2, 33:17,

35:8, 36:12, 36:15, 36:18,

38:6, 39:18, 41:10, 41:17,

43:21, 67:12, 70:6, 74:24,

75:12, 75:18, 75:19, 75:21,

75:24

quick [1] - 34:17

quirk [2] - 41:4, 100:5

quite [2] - 100:15, 100:17

R

R-o-s-s-i [1] - 5:2

rabbi [1] - 5:16

race [4] - 72:2, 72:4, 72:9

Rachel [2] - 40:23, 75:10

radiation [2] - 53:8, 53:12

17

radio [5] - 11:6, 47:5, 56:18,

78:10, 94:20

Ragoza [1] - 49:22

Raigoza [1] - 40:21

raise [3] - 8:7, 39:23, 42:7

raised [2] - 31:11, 31:13

ramble [1] - 13:12

ramp [1] - 57:6

ran [2] - 31:20, 64:1

range [1] - 17:14

rather [2] - 5:7, 41:13

Ravenswood [1] - 62:25

re [1] - 24:8

re-evaluate [1] - 24:8

read [17] - 3:20, 7:16, 8:10,

9:9, 10:18, 11:5, 14:21,

43:2, 79:17, 85:23, 86:3,

86:4, 90:20, 90:22, 96:8,

96:11

reader [1] - 85:23

reading [7] - 8:18, 64:22,

85:24, 91:25, 94:17, 97:23,

100:25

real [3] - 55:15, 61:15, 64:24

reality [2] - 61:12, 78:11

really [11] - 18:19, 26:6, 37:4,

39:15, 45:21, 49:14, 52:5,

53:23, 78:11, 101:1

Really [1] - 26:10

realtor [2] - 54:10, 54:11

reason [5] - 12:10, 14:10,

15:19, 20:25, 36:25

reasonable [2] - 9:15, 18:22

reasons [1] - 19:16

Rebecca [3] - 54:14, 54:16,

55:12

rebuild [1] - 95:9

rebut [2] - 7:12, 22:7

rebuts [1] - 22:17

rebuttal [5] - 4:19, 5:3, 9:6,

24:17, 34:14

receivable [1] - 50:18

received [5] - 16:4, 19:10,

28:19, 35:3, 53:6

recent [1] - 71:23

recently [1] - 98:1

recess [1] - 39:3

recognize [1] - 22:14

record [7] - 3:5, 19:6, 25:9,

35:2, 69:18, 71:9, 106:5

records [2] - 4:3, 6:21

recruit [1] - 37:14

recruitment [1] - 37:15

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 123 of 130 PageID #:2651
reduction [2] - 63:6, 63:20

refer [2] - 31:10, 31:25

reference [2] - 11:12, 70:20

reflects [1] - 35:9

regarding [15] - 7:1, 14:14,

16:9, 19:12, 19:23, 19:24,

20:1, 20:18, 20:19, 21:6,

24:8, 26:13, 27:7, 31:15,

32:19

regional [2] - 94:8, 94:24

registered [5] - 32:6, 57:23,

58:6, 83:15, 96:4

registers [1] - 83:16

registrar [2] - 83:6, 83:16

registration [1] - 71:24

regular [2] - 85:24, 99:19

regularly [9] - 52:4, 53:22,

56:1, 61:11, 83:10, 85:23,

88:24, 98:19, 99:17

rejected [1] - 22:4

related [1] - 102:2

relationship [1] - 22:11

relax [2] - 58:16, 78:12

relaxing [1] - 61:9

relevance [1] - 21:18

relevant [6] - 15:2, 15:15,

15:19, 17:25, 30:2, 34:10

removed [1] - 31:6

rent [16] - 7:1, 44:16, 47:2,

50:4, 50:6, 51:22, 55:1,

55:2, 55:3, 56:19, 61:17,

61:18, 62:25, 77:25, 78:20,

86:6

rental [1] - 77:23

rented [2] - 83:1, 94:2

renter [1] - 84:6

rep [2] - 56:15, 62:3

report [2] - 79:20, 98:21

reporter [4] - 39:11, 65:23,

68:15, 73:5

Reporter [2] - 1:23, 106:7

REPORTER [1] - 1:23

reports [2] - 11:7, 11:20

represent [1] - 42:20

representation [2] - 71:21,

72:7

representative [1] - 57:2

represented [1] - 102:10

represents [2] - 102:8, 102:11

reps [1] - 94:9

reputation [2] - 23:24, 24:24

required [4] - 9:18, 9:19,

73:20, 74:22

requirement [6] - 92:7, 92:8,

92:9, 92:10, 92:21

research [8] - 10:12, 11:10,

100:9, 103:11, 103:12,

103:13, 103:14

researcher [1] - 97:21

residence [1] - 91:20

residency [1] - 98:16

resident [1] - 97:9

residential [1] - 86:12

respect [4] - 20:17, 32:3,

33:9, 59:12

respond [3] - 16:1, 20:5, 21:2

responded [4] - 14:23, 36:20,

37:22, 73:8

respondent [4] - 37:2, 37:12,

37:21, 38:10

responds [1] - 28:4

response [1] - 29:6

responsibilities [2] - 70:22,

100:10

responsibility [1] - 36:13

responsible [4] - 36:5, 66:6,

69:9, 88:11

rest [3] - 65:19, 68:11, 72:24

restaurant [6] - 57:22, 61:1,

61:3, 61:22, 62:1, 86:13

restrict [1] - 24:23

resulted [1] - 30:14

resume [1] - 75:11

retired [10] - 47:25, 48:1,

67:8, 79:10, 80:15, 80:18,

90:11, 91:2, 96:1, 101:14

retirement [5] - 94:10, 95:22,

100:7, 101:13, 101:15

return [3] - 102:17, 102:19

Reuter's [1] - 98:1

ride [1] - 36:22

riding [1] - 80:22

rights [1] - 102:5

rise [4] - 3:1, 39:4, 39:22,

104:24

risk [3] - 21:9, 33:12, 104:18

RMR [1] - 106:7

RN [1] - 58:8

road [5] - 15:22, 81:17, 88:25,

89:2, 94:7

Robert [2] - 4:2, 43:7

Roberts [2] - 41:4, 96:21

Roby [2] - 40:22, 60:22

Rocio [1] - 41:7

role [2] - 16:18, 71:12

room [1] - 63:9

18

Root [1] - 51:16

root [1] - 52:9

Rossi [10] - 5:2, 19:6, 19:15,

19:25, 20:8, 20:11, 20:21,

22:24, 25:2, 43:10

Rossi's [1] - 19:5

rotation [4] - 92:10, 92:13,

92:14

rotations [1] - 73:22

row [7] - 40:5, 40:7, 40:10,

40:14, 40:17, 85:15, 86:8

rude [1] - 12:3

Rule [3] - 20:5, 27:1, 33:17

rule [3] - 72:1, 72:11, 89:14

ruling [6] - 16:8, 25:25, 30:17,

34:1, 71:10

rulings [3] - 10:1, 10:3, 55:19

run [2] - 17:20, 87:9

runner [1] - 87:5

running [3] - 4:24, 85:25, 87:7

runs [2] - 87:3, 104:18

rushing [1] - 93:4

S

S-w-i-a-t-e-k [1] - 37:5

safe [2] - 5:7, 70:25

safety [2] - 81:15, 96:2

Saint [1] - 79:8

Sal [1] - 40:20

sales [2] - 78:17, 94:9

salon [1] - 86:4

Saltzberg [1] - 100:16

Salvato [3] - 40:20, 43:23,

44:4

San [2] - 100:21, 100:22

Sandra [3] - 39:9, 41:3, 95:18

sandwich [1] - 94:18

Sargent [1] - 51:20

scan [1] - 22:10

schedule [3] - 36:10, 66:16,

66:22

scheduling [11] - 35:3, 35:9,

38:20, 65:14, 66:1, 68:17,

71:13, 72:18, 73:8, 73:10,

92:4

school [53] - 36:6, 36:11,

36:12, 37:13, 37:14, 37:16,

38:12, 38:13, 44:7, 45:8,

49:6, 50:9, 50:10, 53:10,

54:8, 56:12, 64:13, 66:4,

66:7, 66:8, 67:3, 67:7, 67:9,

68:24, 68:25, 69:2, 69:10,

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 124 of 130 PageID #:2652
69:11, 69:14, 69:19, 69:22,

69:23, 70:18, 70:19, 70:21,

70:23, 71:1, 71:17, 73:21,

74:14, 77:22, 81:8, 83:21,

83:22, 88:13, 91:3, 91:14,

91:24, 96:24, 98:15, 98:16,

101:9

schoolers [1] - 87:4

schooling [2] - 50:12, 96:24

schools [1] - 92:12

Schweppes [1] - 61:25

sciences [1] - 91:12

Sciences [1] - 86:24

Scott [2] - 3:11, 42:20

SCOTT [1] - 1:17

scrapbooking [1] - 94:17

seal [3] - 25:23, 25:24, 26:2

search [1] - 45:24

searching [1] - 11:11

seat [7] - 34:17, 36:16, 40:6,

67:17, 70:10, 75:5, 76:12

seated [6] - 8:17, 11:21, 40:1,

42:15, 42:25, 71:3

seats [3] - 102:17, 102:19,

104:23

second [12] - 8:1, 11:5, 16:6,

25:8, 36:5, 40:7, 42:1,

74:22, 77:10, 77:11, 91:16,

102:20

Secretary [1] - 71:25

secretary [1] - 53:15

Security [1] - 64:3

security [1] - 89:23

see [32] - 3:20, 8:9, 9:25,

11:20, 12:2, 12:8, 12:12,

22:1, 35:5, 42:10, 43:1,

51:23, 58:12, 63:13, 68:4,

69:5, 71:5, 71:6, 71:16,

72:19, 72:22, 74:18, 74:21,

80:22, 83:18, 92:16, 99:11,

99:14, 101:14, 102:15,

103:3, 104:22

seek [2] - 13:25, 104:17

seeking [1] - 20:8

seeks [1] - 20:7

seem [1] - 71:4

Seiko [1] - 87:15

Seinfeld [3] - 52:5, 52:6,

83:11

selection [7] - 7:18, 39:18,

74:13, 74:20, 76:12, 76:23,

77:14

self [5] - 37:3, 37:11, 44:8,

44:9, 94:10

self-directed [1] - 94:10

self-employed [2] - 37:3, 44:9

self-employment [1] - 37:11

sell [2] - 77:25, 87:15

semi [1] - 88:19

semi-professional [1] - 88:19

send [1] - 58:13

senior [2] - 56:15, 94:8

sense [1] - 29:24

sensitive [2] - 71:20, 72:6

sent [1] - 88:12

sentence [1] - 18:12

September [4] - 37:23, 38:4,

73:18

series [2] - 56:2, 56:3

seriously [1] - 67:2

Serravino [1] - 64:18

serve [5] - 39:15, 71:12, 74:7,

103:22, 103:23

served [2] - 89:17, 89:20

servers [1] - 61:3

service [10] - 36:6, 62:3, 66:5,

73:14, 74:13, 83:3, 83:13,

94:5, 94:6, 94:22

services [1] - 63:12

servicing [2] - 78:2, 78:6

session [2] - 3:2, 9:25

set [3] - 13:11, 64:2, 102:22

setting [3] - 28:21, 88:11,

89:12

Seven [1] - 57:11

seven [7] - 35:21, 52:17,

61:25, 88:2, 91:22, 95:11,

95:19

Seventh [1] - 9:10

several [2] - 31:6, 72:13

Shakespeare [1] - 90:13

shaky [1] - 18:14

shall [1] - 19:2

shared [1] - 36:13

shares [1] - 32:5

Sharon [1] - 96:3

Shaun [2] - 40:22, 56:10

shed [1] - 16:12

shift [1] - 66:9

ship [1] - 48:24

Shore [1] - 98:8

short [1] - 76:11

Show [1] - 79:19

show [2] - 43:17, 77:13

showing [1] - 21:14

shows [4] - 52:21, 58:21,

19

78:10, 78:11

shy [1] - 88:4

side [27] - 10:4, 35:23, 36:17,

36:23, 38:20, 40:7, 40:14,

41:13, 41:14, 41:16, 41:18,

49:23, 50:4, 65:15, 65:17,

66:5, 66:6, 67:2, 67:3, 67:4,

75:15, 75:22, 77:13, 84:5,

89:18, 89:19, 92:16

sidebar [8] - 65:18, 67:19,

68:10, 70:11, 72:23, 75:6,

77:4, 92:18

sides [1] - 42:11

signed [1] - 11:16

significant [1] - 31:19

similar [7] - 7:23, 15:8, 19:21,

41:23, 73:19, 73:22, 90:16

simply [5] - 8:4, 9:1, 19:19,

42:4, 60:7

singing [1] - 94:16

single [4] - 38:10, 63:13,

88:18, 91:19

sisters [1] - 91:24

sit [4] - 40:3, 40:7, 40:13,

58:20

site [4] - 63:15, 64:25, 86:3,

88:12

sites [6] - 45:22, 50:22, 50:24,

84:13, 86:1, 92:2

sits [1] - 40:6

sitting [4] - 39:11, 42:12,

42:21, 65:23

situation [3] - 16:11, 21:10,

21:18

six [5] - 20:14, 51:14, 95:1,

96:22, 99:8

ski [1] - 78:8

SKWRER [1] - 81:25

slate [1] - 52:2

slipped [2] - 72:19, 72:20

slow [2] - 78:2, 97:14

small [2] - 46:10, 100:22

smile [1] - 17:19

smiles [1] - 104:13

Smith [2] - 37:21, 41:5

snow [1] - 78:8

soap [1] - 50:3

social [1] - 10:22

Social [1] - 64:3

Sodetz [2] - 4:2, 42:17

SODETZ [1] - 4:2

sold [1] - 32:5

solely [1] - 65:7

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 125 of 130 PageID #:2653
solicitation [1] - 16:22

solicited [2] - 7:24, 41:24

solo [1] - 65:8

solution [2] - 88:12, 90:2

solve [1] - 88:13

someone [4] - 27:4, 34:6,

34:7, 57:5

sometimes [6] - 15:16, 45:24,

58:20, 69:11, 69:14, 86:4

somewhat [1] - 102:10

son [9] - 58:1, 58:22, 78:5,

80:17, 83:6, 96:2, 96:5,

96:22, 100:19

songs [1] - 87:11

Sorry [1] - 97:18

sorry [14] - 3:16, 5:7, 9:17,

12:24, 21:23, 22:20, 50:11,

62:14, 63:2, 69:1, 74:13,

77:12, 81:11, 97:15

sort [3] - 7:2, 13:13, 57:7

sorting [1] - 49:1

sound [1] - 92:20

sounds [1] - 70:24

source [1] - 96:10

sources [2] - 89:6, 101:7

South [2] - 1:14, 1:24

south [4] - 12:14, 85:14, 86:6,

102:22

Southside [1] - 91:17

southside [1] - 46:8

speaking [1] - 30:17

special [1] - 58:19

Special [1] - 42:17

specialize [1] - 97:3

specializes [1] - 98:13

specializing [2] - 51:21, 95:7

specialty [1] - 86:13

specific [28] - 22:5, 22:10,

22:16, 22:20, 23:16, 24:4,

26:17, 26:22, 27:9, 27:18,

28:21, 29:25, 30:4, 31:15,

31:23, 31:25, 32:4, 32:8,

32:14, 32:19, 32:20, 32:22,

33:17, 40:2, 40:3, 101:22

specifically [2] - 23:23, 32:25

speculating [1] - 104:5

speculative [1] - 18:21

spell [1] - 5:13

spelled [1] - 6:3

spelling [1] - 5:20

spend [1] - 31:18

sporting [1] - 70:19

sports [9] - 56:15, 63:14,

68:25, 69:2, 69:12, 70:20,

70:21, 99:14, 99:18

springs [1] - 54:5

Springs [3] - 54:23, 55:1, 55:3

Square [1] - 51:13

squelch [1] - 17:7

squirrely [1] - 33:20

St [4] - 66:7, 66:23, 66:24,

98:7

Stafford [2] - 40:24, 80:12

Stahller [1] - 6:1

Staller [1] - 6:3

STALLER [1] - 6:3

stamped [1] - 28:9

stand [1] - 43:16

standard [1] - 89:14

standards [2] - 88:11, 89:15

start [10] - 37:15, 41:9, 43:23,

60:12, 73:14, 88:4, 104:2,

104:5, 104:15

started [6] - 37:3, 67:9, 67:10,

68:23, 88:15, 101:17

starting [2] - 40:11, 43:15

State [4] - 30:24, 31:1, 71:25,

92:8

state [4] - 18:1, 71:24, 88:3,

92:20

statement [9] - 7:17, 8:9,

14:8, 15:4, 15:8, 15:12,

15:21, 18:20, 19:3

statements [7] - 9:1, 9:3,

9:23, 10:25, 15:9, 15:17

States [3] - 3:3, 3:8, 39:13

STATES [3] - 1:1, 1:3, 1:13

station [2] - 94:19, 94:20

stations [4] - 45:19, 62:15,

62:16, 101:4

stay [4] - 35:11, 48:20, 49:16,

67:18

step [6] - 38:19, 65:21, 68:13,

73:4, 74:20, 75:4

Steven [2] - 5:12, 43:10

still [12] - 17:14, 21:10, 34:13,

44:18, 48:20, 49:7, 49:15,

51:1, 57:23, 65:24, 71:17,

101:15

stipulations [1] - 9:21

Stoller [1] - 43:11

stop [2] - 11:21, 45:1

store [7] - 44:11, 44:21, 45:1,

45:4, 87:13, 91:17, 91:21

stories [4] - 10:11, 11:6,

58:18, 89:7

20

story [3] - 23:12, 26:22, 27:12

straighten [1] - 70:5

strategize [1] - 19:1

Street [3] - 1:14, 1:24, 84:14

street [2] - 69:3, 70:3

streets [1] - 70:25

strict [1] - 103:5

strictest [1] - 7:1

strip [1] - 18:2

strong [4] - 22:8, 22:19, 71:4,

71:6

student [5] - 64:21, 73:13,

91:14, 97:11, 100:11

students [1] - 37:14

studies [1] - 95:20

study [1] - 91:15

stuff [5] - 28:20, 62:5, 69:3,

85:25, 86:5

Su [1] - 39:11

subbed [1] - 80:3

subject [3] - 29:23, 89:22,

89:23

subjective [1] - 16:13

submitted [1] - 73:17

subscribe [1] - 101:5

subscription [1] - 79:18

subtract [3] - 10:13, 11:23,

12:16

suburban [1] - 97:7

suburbs [1] - 51:18

sued [3] - 20:20, 20:21, 20:22

sufficient [2] - 22:11, 34:11

sufficiently [1] - 34:10

suggested [1] - 24:2

suggestion [1] - 14:20

suits [1] - 102:6

summarizes [1] - 28:22

summary [1] - 9:1

summer [2] - 58:17, 91:16

Sun [3] - 90:22, 90:23, 90:24

Sunday [1] - 64:24

superintendent [1] - 77:24

supervisor[1] - 53:18

supplement [1] - 71:23

supplemented [1] - 71:24

support [3] - 30:7, 38:11,

89:19

suppose [1] - 17:1

supposed [1] - 73:14

supposedly [1] - 31:20

surgeon [1] - 80:16

surgery [4] - 73:14, 73:23,

73:25, 93:18

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 126 of 130 PageID #:2654
surgical [2] - 53:6, 92:13

Susan [1] - 96:3

suspense [1] - 19:4

suspicion [2] - 8:7, 42:7

Swiatek [1] - 37:5

swimmer [1] - 87:6

sworn [1] - 39:24

Symantec [1] - 88:5

syndication [1] - 52:6

system [1] - 89:18

systems [2] - 77:23, 90:3

T

table [4] - 42:13, 42:16, 42:21,

42:25

Takeda [2] - 88:7, 89:25

Tap [1] - 89:25

tap [1] - 88:8

target [1] - 22:14

taught [1] - 80:3

taxes [1] - 44:17

teach [1] - 37:15

teacher [2] - 37:13, 45:8

team [1] - 88:10

tech [1] - 53:6

technician [2] - 80:5, 80:18

technology [6] - 88:14, 89:9,

89:17, 89:23, 89:24, 89:25

Technology [1] - 46:9

telephones [2] - 8:2, 42:2

television [18] - 11:6, 52:3,

53:22, 55:25, 61:10, 61:12,

61:13, 62:13, 62:15, 78:10,

83:8, 84:12, 87:19, 88:24,

92:1, 98:18, 99:17

teller [1] - 81:6

ten [5] - 47:18, 58:14, 79:9,

80:2, 84:6

tend [1] - 15:20

term [1] - 32:13

terms [2] - 72:4, 90:21

testified [1] - 30:19

testify [7] - 13:20, 14:16,

18:16, 19:3, 19:12, 22:24,

26:12

testifying [1] - 18:18

testimony [32] - 6:20, 7:10,

7:11, 9:21, 9:24, 13:25,

16:15, 17:2, 17:14, 18:3,

19:5, 20:13, 20:25, 21:19,

23:17, 23:19, 23:24, 24:1,

24:23, 26:25, 27:1, 28:2,

29:15, 30:6, 30:10, 32:14,

33:8, 33:9, 34:11, 59:15,

59:17

testing [1] - 79:15

Texas [1] - 100:20

THE [173] - 1:10, 3:1, 3:3,

3:14, 3:19, 3:23, 4:6, 4:9,

4:12, 4:14, 4:23, 5:7, 5:13,

5:15, 5:18, 5:20, 5:22, 5:25,

6:3, 6:5, 6:9, 6:14, 6:22, 7:8,

7:14, 8:13, 8:16, 10:17,

11:20, 12:6, 12:10, 12:19,

12:24, 13:1, 13:3, 13:6,

13:10, 13:19, 16:2, 17:18,

21:22, 21:24, 22:3, 23:4,

23:8, 23:13, 23:21, 24:13,

25:1, 25:4, 25:8, 25:17,

25:20, 26:4, 26:7, 26:10,

27:8, 27:10, 28:6, 28:21,

28:25, 29:4, 29:20, 33:5,

34:4, 34:15, 35:2, 35:17,

35:19, 35:25, 36:2, 36:9,

36:15, 37:1, 37:7, 37:10,

37:20, 38:3, 38:6, 38:8,

38:17, 38:22, 38:24, 39:1,

39:4, 39:5, 39:22, 40:1,

42:18, 42:23, 44:2, 45:25,

46:2, 47:6, 47:9, 49:17,

49:20, 51:5, 51:10, 53:2,

54:2, 56:4, 56:7, 57:17,

58:22, 60:16, 60:19, 62:18,

62:21, 63:17, 64:4, 64:8,

65:9, 65:12, 65:21, 66:11,

67:12, 67:15, 67:17, 67:22,

68:1, 68:7, 70:6, 70:8,

70:10, 70:14, 70:16, 70:20,

71:9, 73:2, 75:2, 75:4,

75:16, 75:20, 76:11, 76:16,

76:18, 76:21, 77:3, 77:7,

77:18, 78:22, 79:2, 80:6,

80:9, 82:4, 82:20, 83:24,

84:2, 85:7, 85:10, 86:14,

86:17, 87:23, 90:4, 90:7,

91:5, 91:8, 92:16, 93:1,

93:9, 93:17, 93:20, 93:23,

95:12, 95:15, 96:16, 96:19,

98:22, 99:2, 99:23, 100:2,

102:12

theater [5] - 52:21, 52:22,

90:13, 90:20

themselves [1] - 42:12

thereabouts [1] - 65:3

therefore [1] - 30:20

thinks [1] - 19:17

21

Third [1] - 84:23

third [7] - 11:10, 40:8, 66:13,

66:14, 73:13, 73:20, 91:13

third-year [3] - 73:13, 73:20,

91:13

Thompson [2] - 88:16, 89:8

Thorpe [2] - 4:4, 43:8

THORPE [1] - 4:5

three [16] - 41:6, 44:12, 48:14,

48:15, 54:13, 66:12, 79:12,

83:1, 84:25, 85:14, 88:6,

88:8, 94:7, 94:22, 94:23

Three [1] - 84:17

threshold [1] - 25:11

Thrones [1] - 56:2

throughout [2] - 9:13, 46:14

Thursday [1] - 66:21

Tinley [1] - 79:5

tip [1] - 86:4

tired [1] - 87:11

title [2] - 60:9, 88:12

to/from [1] - 38:12

today [8] - 38:13, 39:8, 66:19,

67:9, 74:17, 76:13, 76:23,

88:11

together [1] - 62:4

Tom [3] - 41:1, 60:25, 84:5

tomorrow [3] - 11:20, 66:19,

76:12

tonight [1] - 90:21

took [9] - 14:1, 15:7, 16:5,

16:9, 79:11, 95:22, 95:23,

100:7, 101:15

top [3] - 3:24, 71:20, 88:10

topic [1] - 13:21

toward [1] - 40:11

towards [2] - 60:1, 65:22

town [1] - 80:13

townhome [1] - 78:21

Tracie [1] - 41:7

track [1] - 66:22

trade [2] - 102:1, 102:2

Trade [1] - 55:10

trader [1] - 55:9

trades [1] - 78:1

trading [1] - 89:6

traditionally [1] - 23:14

trained [1] - 58:10

trainer [3] - 61:5, 61:7, 62:8

trains [1] - 62:11

trait [1] - 22:21

transactions [1] - 19:17

TRANSCRIPT [1] - 1:9

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 127 of 130 PageID #:2655
transcript [2] - 10:6, 106:4

transfer [3] - 27:17, 30:15,

30:24

transferred [1] - 28:4

transferring [1] - 27:15

transportation [2] - 83:2

travel [5] - 46:17, 51:24, 53:9,

64:22

traveling [1] - 85:24

trial [13] - 8:24, 10:21, 10:24,

11:22, 14:16, 29:11, 36:11,

43:3, 64:19, 72:8, 76:3,

89:12, 103:24

TRIAL [1] - 1:9

trials [1] - 64:20

Tribune [5] - 53:21, 63:16,

79:18, 90:22, 96:11

tried [4] - 26:8, 63:24, 69:17,

71:13

trier [1] - 83:2

tries [3] - 11:3, 96:7, 103:17

Triton [1] - 53:6

trucker [1] - 96:5

trucks [1] - 94:6

true [2] - 17:8, 58:18

Truemper[2] - 5:11, 43:10

truly [1] - 57:24

trust [1] - 94:9

truth [2] - 28:3, 39:20

truthfulness [12] - 26:13,

26:15, 26:21, 27:2, 27:4,

27:18, 27:24, 30:7, 30:11,

31:22, 32:21, 34:8

try [12] - 10:3, 15:5, 18:25,

23:16, 31:5, 33:10, 40:15,

73:25, 74:17, 74:20, 76:21,

76:22

trying [10] - 7:2, 15:6, 17:7,

23:1, 42:22, 49:6, 58:3,

69:2, 69:18, 70:5

Tuchman [2] - 6:6, 6:8

Tuesday [2] - 73:18, 93:11

turn [3] - 28:18, 31:17, 31:21

turned [4] - 14:5, 14:14,

28:23, 28:24

turns [1] - 76:23

TV [8] - 45:18, 45:19, 54:20,

55:22, 63:14, 87:7, 89:1,

90:21

Tweet [1] - 10:23

Tweeting [1] - 10:11

tweeting [1] - 104:10

twice [1] - 89:18

Twitter[5] - 10:23, 89:4, 89:5,

98:1, 104:10

two [37] - 4:18, 5:5, 7:22,

25:21, 31:20, 31:21, 37:14,

37:15, 38:12, 41:3, 41:22,

45:6, 49:3, 52:12, 53:8,

53:16, 58:1, 61:23, 64:20,

66:3, 66:9, 66:12, 72:12,

74:5, 74:6, 76:1, 80:4,

82:25, 83:5, 87:4, 90:15,

94:14, 97:13, 100:19

Two [1] - 81:9

two-week [1] - 74:6

type [9] - 8:1, 15:5, 20:23,

41:24, 42:1, 55:14, 57:8,

59:25, 97:5

types [3] - 7:22, 41:22, 101:3

U

U.S [1] - 104:11

UIC [1] - 64:13

under [7] - 21:20, 25:23,

25:24, 26:2, 27:1, 29:19,

103:5

undergrad [3] - 91:13, 91:14,

91:24

underlying [3] - 26:23, 30:14,

31:3

undermine [1] - 23:17

understood [1] - 14:3

undo [3] - 21:9, 21:19, 22:22

unemployed [3] - 44:10,

44:25, 51:17

unemployment [2] - 63:25,

64:1

unfair [1] - 104:4

unfairly [1] - 17:5

unfortunately [1] - 84:19

unfriendly [2] - 12:13, 103:4

unincorporated [1] - 80:13

union [2] - 80:19, 81:5

united [1] - 78:15

United [4] - 3:3, 3:8, 39:13,

57:5

UNITED [3] - 1:1, 1:3, 1:13

University [4] - 63:9, 86:22,

97:12, 97:19

university [4] - 58:7, 63:7,

79:9, 88:3

unless [3] - 9:14, 18:23, 19:2

unlike [1] - 32:9

unnecessarily [1] - 29:11

22

untruthfulness [3] - 29:25,

30:4, 34:9

up [33] - 7:2, 10:15, 20:12,

20:13, 22:21, 27:14, 27:19,

27:24, 28:16, 29:16, 30:1,

38:18, 38:23, 38:24, 43:16,

44:15, 47:14, 47:23, 52:22,

64:2, 67:12, 68:13, 68:22,

69:12, 70:6, 70:24, 72:17,

73:4, 74:9, 74:24, 81:21,

89:12

upcoming [1] - 66:16

UPS [1] - 53:18

Urbana [1] - 86:23

V

valid [2] - 31:14, 71:16

value [5] - 17:4, 21:11, 22:9,

22:19, 34:2

Van [1] - 46:10

Vanessa [2] - 4:3, 43:7

variety [1] - 100:10

vein [1] - 15:18

venire [1] - 71:4

verbally [1] - 3:23

verdict [2] - 8:24, 9:8

verification [1] - 19:12

Veronica [2] - 40:21, 49:22

versa [1] - 12:14

version [1] - 70:24

versus [3] - 3:3, 39:14,

104:11

vice [1] - 12:13

victims [1] - 58:19

view [2] - 72:2, 88:6

Village [1] - 83:1

village [1] - 44:5

villages [1] - 59:4

violence [2] - 7:25, 41:25

visit [1] - 84:13

voice [1] - 47:14

voir [9] - 21:1, 65:19, 67:20,

68:11, 70:12, 72:24, 75:7,

92:19, 93:15

Voir [1] - 39:24

VOIR [2] - 2:9, 35:1

VOLUME [1] - 1:9

volunteer[3] - 70:2, 70:3,

71:11

volunteers [2] - 70:17, 71:14

voter [2] - 71:24

vs [1] - 1:5

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 128 of 130 PageID #:2656
W

Wacker [1] - 1:21

wait [7] - 8:10, 9:17, 24:19,

34:4, 76:17, 77:1, 77:2

walk [2] - 44:14, 103:18

walks [1] - 78:8

Wall [1] - 84:14

wall [2] - 40:14, 73:4

wallflower [1] - 21:3

WALLIN [26] - 1:20, 3:10,

5:10, 5:14, 5:16, 5:19, 5:21,

6:1, 6:4, 6:7, 6:13, 6:16, 7:4,

7:6, 7:9, 8:14, 16:1, 16:3,

21:5, 26:1, 26:6, 26:8, 29:3,

29:5, 29:7, 76:8

Wallin [5] - 3:11, 28:17,

31:11, 31:13, 42:22

Walsted [2] - 40:22, 56:10

wants [2] - 5:4, 24:21

ward [1] - 41:7

warned [1] - 38:3

warning [1] - 13:12

Washington [1] - 101:6

watch [34] - 45:19, 50:2, 52:3,

53:22, 54:20, 55:25, 56:2,

56:16, 58:18, 58:20, 61:11,

63:14, 63:15, 78:9, 78:12,

79:19, 79:20, 83:8, 83:10,

84:11, 85:22, 87:6, 87:15,

88:24, 89:1, 90:20, 90:21,

98:18, 98:20, 99:17, 101:2,

101:3

watches [1] - 87:15

watching [3] - 61:9, 80:21,

80:23

water [1] - 78:8

Waubonsee [1] - 95:21

ways [1] - 18:15

WBBM [1] - 56:18

WBEZ's [1] - 86:3

wear [1] - 87:2

web [8] - 45:24, 50:22, 50:24,

63:15, 64:25, 84:13, 86:3,

97:25

Wednesday [5] - 19:10,

66:20, 67:10, 73:14, 92:13

Wedron [3] - 80:12, 81:19,

81:20

WEDRON [1] - 80:13

week [18] - 8:19, 28:23, 28:24,

32:25, 35:22, 66:3, 66:9,

66:12, 67:7, 67:10, 67:11,

71:5, 74:5, 74:6, 74:17,

92:24, 92:25

weekend [3] - 13:14, 25:22,

28:19

weeks [4] - 37:14, 37:15,

68:23, 73:24

weight [1] - 60:6

welcome [1] - 39:5

wells [1] - 46:11

West [2] - 1:18, 1:21

west [4] - 49:23, 50:4, 67:3,

67:4

western [1] - 54:5

Western [3] - 54:23, 55:1,

55:3

WGN [1] - 79:19

white [1] - 77:13

whole [2] - 66:9, 100:10

wife [22] - 32:16, 34:2, 44:10,

44:20, 56:14, 57:1, 64:12,

64:17, 77:14, 78:7, 78:14,

80:15, 80:19, 81:5, 83:6,

83:15, 96:22, 97:11, 97:19,

99:12, 100:15, 101:20

William [6] - 5:10, 40:23,

40:24, 43:10, 64:11, 80:12

willing [2] - 31:7, 31:24

willingness [1] - 39:14

Wilson [1] - 41:7

windows [1] - 87:16

Wisconsin [1] - 71:18

witness [34] - 5:17, 5:24, 6:2,

6:11, 6:15, 14:6, 15:6, 18:5,

18:6, 18:7, 21:6, 21:7, 22:9,

22:11, 23:15, 23:16, 23:18,

23:19, 24:17, 24:21, 26:14,

27:3, 29:9, 29:10, 30:2,

30:11, 31:9, 59:21, 89:17,

89:18, 89:20

witness' [3] - 18:3, 27:1

witnessed [1] - 16:23

witnesses [27] - 3:20, 4:7,

4:16, 4:18, 4:19, 5:3, 5:8,

9:2, 9:4, 12:13, 19:11,

19:23, 19:24, 19:25, 20:18,

20:24, 23:2, 23:6, 23:10,

29:23, 31:14, 33:12, 43:2,

43:6, 59:16, 102:21, 103:2

witnesses' [1] - 103:14

women [1] - 87:2

worker [1] - 63:9

worker's [1] - 57:8

workers [1] - 71:14

23

works [25] - 45:8, 45:10,

48:18, 48:21, 54:15, 54:17,

54:18, 55:13, 56:14, 57:1,

57:4, 58:1, 61:4, 67:6, 78:5,

78:15, 79:12, 79:14, 80:16,

80:17, 81:11, 94:12, 99:12

worried [1] - 93:4

worry [1] - 33:22

worse [2] - 18:15, 18:18

worth [4] - 4:22, 4:24, 72:14

write [1] - 90:20

writing [1] - 102:18

written [1] - 34:16

wrote [1] - 36:3

WSPY [1] - 94:18

WTTW [1] - 85:22

X

Xavier [1] - 79:8

Y

Y-e-s-s-n-e-r [1] - 5:21

Yahoo [4] - 50:25, 83:9, 84:14

yard [1] - 58:17

year [25] - 37:16, 44:8, 49:5,

49:8, 49:10, 52:11, 54:6,

54:9, 55:6, 56:12, 63:24,

64:16, 73:13, 73:20, 74:1,

74:3, 74:22, 80:15, 81:11,

88:8, 91:13, 94:11, 94:14,

96:6, 98:10

years [83] - 26:18, 26:20,

34:7, 35:12, 45:6, 46:6,

46:12, 46:24, 47:12, 49:23,

49:25, 51:14, 52:16, 52:17,

53:13, 54:12, 54:25, 56:11,

56:13, 56:23, 57:11, 57:22,

58:5, 58:11, 58:15, 61:20,

61:23, 61:25, 63:1, 63:19,

64:21, 65:2, 77:22, 78:4,

78:19, 79:6, 79:9, 80:2,

80:4, 80:20, 81:4, 81:6,

81:9, 81:22, 82:25, 83:1,

83:14, 83:20, 84:6, 84:8,

84:17, 84:25, 85:15, 85:18,

86:21, 86:25, 88:3, 88:7,

88:8, 90:15, 91:12, 94:2,

94:7, 94:13, 94:14, 94:22,

95:1, 95:11, 95:19, 95:22,

95:23, 96:22, 97:13, 99:6,

99:8, 99:11, 99:22, 100:6,

100:18

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 129 of 130 PageID #:2657
24

Yesner [1] - 43:11

Yessner [1] - 5:19

York [4] - 63:15, 64:24, 90:23,

97:24

Yorker [2] - 85:23, 101:5

Yorkville [2] - 94:1, 94:3

young [3] - 48:20, 49:7, 70:3

youngest [2] - 54:14, 54:18

yourself [2] - 45:5, 51:6

yourselves [2] - 103:21,

104:6

Yousef [1] - 40:20

Z

Zaatar [2] - 40:20, 46:4

Zion [4] - 69:7, 69:8, 69:22,

71:18

zoning [1] - 81:15

Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 180 Filed: 10/22/14 Page 130 of 130 PageID #:2658