alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Loprete, Appellant.

Motion by the District Attorney of Queens County: (la) to have this court hold in abeyance the pending appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County rendered February 15, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery and other crimes; and (b) to remit the action to the trial court for a separate trial *de novo*upon the issue of the voluntariness of defendant’s confession. This motion is made necessary because of the recent decision of *the*Supreme Court of the United States *(Jackson*v. *Denno,*378 U. S. 368). It appears that the issue as to the voluntariness of defendant’s confession was raised at the trial and submitted to the jury. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the action is remitted to the Criminal Term, Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. A separate trial should be accorded promptly to the defendant upon the issue of the voluntariness of his confession. Such trial should be held *de novo*before the court alone, without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the Justice presiding shall render promptly his decision setting forth specifically his findings upon the issue. The decision should be based exclusively on the evidence adduced upon such trial. The trial should also be conducted in accordance with such further or different procedures and requirements as may be prescribed by the Court of Appeals of this State in any decision rendered by it prior to the trial court’s decision upon the issue of voluntariness. Within 20 days after the trial court’s decision upon the issue of Voluntariness, a supplemental record, consisting of the typewritten or printed transcript of the stenographic minutes of the separate trial and of the court’s decision and findings, should be filed and served by the District Attorney. Within 20 days thereafter the defendant shall serve and file his typewritten or printed brief or supplemental brief; and within 30 days thereafter the District Attorney shall serve and file his brief or supplemental brief. [If defendant’s brief or supplemental brief be typewritten, six copies are required to be filed and one copy served.] The appeal is directed to be placed on the calendar for the April Term, commencing March 29, 1965. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-79,922-01

EX P ARTE ST EPHEN JAYSANDBLOOM, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 10-DCR- 053774A-HC-1 INTHE 400T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM F ORT BE ND COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of th e T ex as C o de of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 82 6 (T ex . C ri m. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag gravated robber y and sentenc ed to forty year s’ imprisonment. The Four teenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed the conviction. Sandbloom v. State , No. 14-12-00032- CR (Tex .App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sep. 6, 2012). Applicant contends that he was denied his right to pursue a pro se petition for discretionar y revie w in this Court afte r his conviction was aff irmed by the Four

teenth Court of Appea ls. The trial court rec ommends that relief be g rante d, and the writ rec ord supports the rec ommendation. See Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).-2-

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar y revie w of the judgme nt of the Second Court o f Ap p ea l s i n Cause No. 14-12-00032- CR that aff irmed his

co n v i cti on in Cause No. 10-DCR-053774A from the 400th District Court of For t Be nd Cou n t y . Applicant shall file his petition for discr etionary revie w with this C ourt within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Copies of this opinion shall be s e nt to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: September

18, 2013 Do not publish
#### 2822.807-70 Cooperation in equal employment opportunity investigations.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at FAR 52.222-70, Contractor Cooperation in Equal Employment Opportunity Investigations, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that include the clause at FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.
Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 4808 Dir ID: 2014

- NM

- 134

- AD

Contacts. With w hom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/18/14

Regional Airline Association 6/18/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hack man 6/18/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 6/18/14
<PAGE>   1
                                                    Exhibit 10.30
                                                    -------------


                         CERTIFICATE OF CANCELLATION OF
                      CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF
                   BIOGEN MEDICAL PRODUCTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


     This Certificate of Cancellation of Certificate of Limited Partnership of
Biogen Medical Products Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") is being
executed by the undersigned for the purpose of cancelling a limited partnership
pursuant to the Massachusetts Uniform Limited Partnership Act.

     1.   The name of the Partnership is Biogen Medical Products Limited
          Partnership.

     2.   The date of the filing of the Certificate of Limited Partnership of
          the Partnership in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts was August 3,
          1983, which was amended on September 2, 1983 and May 15, 1984.

     3.   The reason for the filing of the Certificate of Cancellation is that
          the Partners have approved the dissolution and winding-up of the
          affairs of the Partnership in accordance with the partnership
          agreement.

     4.   The effective date of the cancellation shall be upon the filing of
          this Certificate with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of
          Massachusetts.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole general partner of the
Partnership, has caused this Certificate of Cancellation of Certificate of
Limited Partnership to be duly executed as of this 24th day of December, 1996.

                                   BIOGEN MEDICAL PRODUCTS
                                   LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                   By:  Biogen, Inc.,
                                         Its General Partner



                                   By:  s/s
                                      -------------------------------
                                       Its duly authorized officer
                                            Michael J. Astrue
                                            Vice President - General Counsel
                                             and Clerk
                                                        FILED

                                                     DEC 24 1996

                                            SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH
                                                 CORPORATIONS DIVISION
#### 326.700 Scope of subpart.

Public Law 101-601, dated November 16, 1990, also known as the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, imposes certain responsibilities on individuals and organizations when they discover Native American cultural items (including human remains) on Federal or tribal lands.
Exhibit 99


            Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Community Banks, Inc.

In our opinion, the consolidated  statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year ended  December 31, 2002  (appearing on pages
43 through 45 of the Community  Banks,  Inc. 2004 Annual Report to  Shareholders
which has been  incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K) present fairly,  in
all material  respects,  the results of  operations  and cash flows of Community
Banks,  Inc. and its  subsidiaries  for the year ended  December  31,  2002,  in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.  These  financial  statements are the  responsibility  of the Company's
management;  our  responsibility  is to express  an  opinion on these  financial
statements  based on our audit.  We conducted  our audit of these  statements in
accordance with auditing  standards  generally  accepted in the United States of
America,  which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain  reasonable
assurance   about  whether  the  financial   statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  financial  statements,   assessing  the
accounting  principles  used and significant  estimates made by management,  and
evaluating the overall  financial  statement  presentation.  We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Harrisburg, PA
January 24, 2003
#### Gilbert A. Ellegard *vs.*Nels Ackland.

June 2, 1890.

Evidence *held*sufficient to sustain the .verdict.

. Action brought in the district court for Freeborn- county, to recover damages for the destruction of plaintiff’s growing trees by a fire negligently kindled by defendant on his own adjoining land. At the trial before *Farmer,*J., it appeared that the fire was set by defendant’s son, and the plaintiff had a verdict of $200. The defendant appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

*John Anderson*and *John Whytock,*for appellant.

*Lovely & Morgan*and *D. F. Morgan,*for respondent.

Gilfillan, C. J.

The only point made by appellant is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to charge him with the negligence of his son in setting the fire which destroyed plaintiff’s property. There was enough to show that íhé son was employed by him, not merely to do some one specified thing, as to plough a particular field, but as a general farm hand, and that within the scope of his employment was to do the grubbing, to facilitate which he set the fire. Where a master áuthorizes a servant to work for him, the former is liable for injury to another caused by the latter’s negligent manner of doing the work, or by some negligent act of his done in the course of and for the purpose of performing the work, even though the master may have forbidden him to be negligent, or to do the negligent act. Authority to the servant to be negligent is not required to make the master liable. The evidence was sufficient.

Order affirmed.
#### (A) Georgia C. Nicholas et al. v. Chaim Lukowski. (B) Fred G. Heydt Construction Co., Inc. v. Barney Uydess et al.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ. [In each action] Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs.
No. 7980.

#### Wehrmann, Exrx., *v.*The Knights Templars & Masonic Mutual Aid Association et al.

(Decided November 24, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Kelley & Hauck,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Robertson & Buchwalter,*for defendants in error.

Judgments of. the lower courts reversed, and judgment for plaintiff in error on authority of *The State National Bank*v. *Esterly, Receiver,*69 Ohio St., 24.

Burket, C. J., Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### William Harrison, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. William Harrison, as Administrator of the Estate of Pearl B. Harrison, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

Claimants appeal from judgments of the Court of Claims dismissing both claims. Claimant William Harrison was driving an automobile in which his wife was a passenger, in a northerly direction on Route 30 about six miles north of Amsterdam on December 24, 1953, when the vehicle left the highway on the east side, struck some mailboxes, abruptly crossed the road to the west side, where it came to rest in a swampy area. The occupants of the car were thrown from it at a point near the mailboxes, which were four or five feet from the east edge of the pavement, and were found on the east shoulder of the road near that point. The road was in the process of being resurfaced and widened, and the contractor had ceased work the day previous for the Winter. There was an “Under Construction” sign at the Amsterdam end of the work project. Claimant William Harrison was familiar with the road. He seeks to recover for his injuries and damage, and as administrator of his wife’s estate seeks to recover for her wrongful death. The accident happened near the end of a curve to the driver’s left. The driver of the ear testified that the night was clear, the road was dry and his lights were on high beam and that he could see the *565curve well (hence additional warning signs would not have aided), but contends that some loose material on the pavement caused him to leave the pavement, and that ruts on the shoulder caused him to lose control. A State trooper testified that the operator told him on the morning following the accident that he did not know and had “ no idea ” what caused the accident. The trial court has found that there was no emergency which necessitated driving upon the shoulder; that there was nothing about the paved portion of the road which caused the vehicle to go upon the shoulder; that the State was not negligent; that any condition of the shoulder in the vicinity of the accident was not a proximate cause of the accident; that the accident was caused solely by the negligence of the operator of the car. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss the evidence or the numerous contentions of the claimants in detail. As we view the record only a factual question was presented, and the evidence presents a reasonable basis for the trier of the facts to make the above-mentioned findings. Judgments unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George W. Rice, Appellant.

Permission to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. Appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the briefi J. R. Hoover, Esq., 216 William St., Elmira, N. Y., is hereby assigned as counsel.
#### 27.400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart sets forth policies and procedures regarding rights in data and copyrights, and acquisition of data. The policy statement in 27.402 applies to all executive agencies. The remainder of the subpart applies to all executive agencies except the Department of Defense.
# C_2018208EN.01000501.xml

| 15.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 June 2018

(2018/C 208/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1730 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4499 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87683 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1600 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1585 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 124,64 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4268 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,651 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 321,09 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2671 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,4251 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5514 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5222 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2058 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6656 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5665 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 269,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,3722 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5009 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3843 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 343,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6750 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,354 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,7553 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,712 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3312 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,0641 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,2925 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1730

JPY

Japanese yen

129,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4499

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87683

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1600

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1585

ISK

Iceland króna

124,64

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4268

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,651

HUF

Hungarian forint

321,09

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2671

RON

Romanian leu

4,6655

TRY

Turkish lira

5,4251

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5514

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5222

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2058

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6656

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5665

KRW

South Korean won

1 269,54

ZAR

South African rand

15,3722

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5009

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3843

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 343,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6750

PHP

Philippine peso

62,354

RUB

Russian rouble

72,7553

THB

Thai baht

37,712

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3312

MXN

Mexican peso

24,0641

INR

Indian rupee

79,2925

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          56,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  917,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         457,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                 417,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,131,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      4,636,773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,723,765
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,431,529)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,131,449
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               323,058
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  603,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (280,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (280,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (280,031)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018133EN.01000101.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 April 2018

(2018/C 133/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2317 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4467 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3798 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1854 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 121,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5643 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,307 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1763 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6603 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,0411 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5801 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5482 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6687 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6703 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6158 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 316,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8457 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7363 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4165 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 939,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7714 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,969 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,2186 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,367 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1979 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,3162 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,3160 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2317

JPY

Japanese yen

132,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4467

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86400

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3798

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1854

ISK

Iceland króna

121,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5643

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,307

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1763

RON

Romanian leu

4,6603

TRY

Turkish lira

5,0411

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5801

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5482

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6687

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6703

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6158

KRW

South Korean won

1 316,26

ZAR

South African rand

14,8457

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7363

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4165

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 939,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7714

PHP

Philippine peso

63,969

RUB

Russian rouble

76,2186

THB

Thai baht

38,367

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1979

MXN

Mexican peso

22,3162

INR

Indian rupee

80,3160

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Key Staff

**Cheryl E. Gibbs**, (202) 453-5690, cheryl.gibbs@ed.gov

## Mailing Address:

U.S. Department of Education, OPEInternational and Foreign Language EducationAmerican Overseas Research Centers Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Room 5C103Washington, DC 20202

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov