alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5 
<CIK> 0000016104 
<NAME> CAGLE'S, INC. 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996 
<CASH>                                             884 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    16955 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       557 
<INVENTORY>                                      36633 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 59189 
<PP&E>                                           97276 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   35764 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  139596 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            22218 
<BONDS>                                          57810 
<COMMON>                                          5006 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                                       45910 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    139596 
<SALES>                                         261341 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                261341 
<CGS>                                           252095 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   265116 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (6358) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3637 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1054) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (400) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (654) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (654) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.13) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13) 
         

</TABLE>
#### 2452.216-72 Determination of award fee earned.

As prescribed in 2416.406(e)(3), insert the following clause in all award fee contracts:

# Determination of Award Fee Earned (FEB 2006)

(a) At the conclusion of each evaluation period specified in the Performance Evaluation Plan, the government shall evaluate the contractor's performance and determine the amount, if any, of award fee earned by the contractor. The amount of award fee to be paid will be determined by the designated Fee Determination Official's (FDO's) judgmental evaluation in accordance with the criteria set forth in the Performance Evaluation Plan. This decision will be made unilaterally by the government. In reaching this decision, the FDO may consider any justification of award fee the contractor submits, provided that the justification is submitted within [insert number] days after the end of an evaluation period. The FDO determination shall be in writing, shall set forth the basis of the FDO's decision, and shall be sent to the contractor within [*insert number*] days after the end of the evaluation period.

(b) The FDO may specify in any fee determination that any amount of fee not earned during the evaluation period may be accumulated and allocated for award during a later evaluation period. The Distribution of Award Fee clause shall be amended to reflect the allocation.

(End of clause)

[71 FR 2438, Jan. 13, 2006]
# FY 2016 NCC

# Sheet3
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.3--SCHEDULE OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

     COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS. Each director of the Corporation is also a
director of First Financial Bank ("FFB"), the lead subsidiary bank of the
Corporation, and receives directors' fees from each organization. For 2006 a
director of the Corporation and FFB will receive a fee of $750 for each board
meeting attended.

     Non-employee directors also receive a fee for meetings attended of the
Audit Committee of $1,000, the Compensation Committee of $1,000, the
Governance/Nominating Committee of $500, and the Loan Discount Committee of
$300. Each director also will receive from FFB a semi-annual director's fee of
$2,500 on July 15th and December 16th. No non-employee director served as a
director of any other subsidiary of the Corporation.

     Directors of the Corporation and FFB who are not yet 70 years of age may
participate in a deferred director's fee program at each institution. Under this
program, a director may defer $6,000 of his or her director's fees each year
over a five-year period. When the director reaches the age of 65 or age 70, the
director may elect to receive payments over a ten-year period. The amount of the
deferred fees is used to purchase an insurance product which funds these
payments. Each year from the initial date of deferral until payments begin at
age 65 or 70, the Corporation accrues a non-cash expense which will equal in the
aggregate the amount of the payments to be made to the director over the
ten-year period. The Corporation expects that the cash surrender value of the
insurance policy will offset the amount of expenses accrued. If a director fails
for any reason other than death to serve as a director during the entire
five-year period, or the director fails to attend at least 60 regular or special
meetings, the amount to be received at age 65 or 70, as applicable, will be
pro-rated appropriately.

     Directors also may be compensated under the Corporation's 2001 Long-Term
Incentive Plan. Under this plan, directors may receive 90, 100 or 110 percent of
the director's "award amount" if the Corporation and FFB attain certain goals
established by the Corporation's Compensation Committee. See Exhibit 10.4 to
this Form 10-K for a description of this plan.
#### 3001.602 Contracting officers.
#### 252.211-7004--252.211-7007 [Reserved]
#### 3023.9000 Contract clause (USCG).

For the U.S. Coast Guard, where all or part of a contract will be performed on Government-owned or leased property, the contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.223-90, Accident and Fire Reporting.
225.7102-2 Exceptions. The policy in 225.7102-1 does not apply to acquisitions— ( a ) Using simplified acquisition procedures, unless the restricted item is the end item being purchased;
( b ) Overseas for overseas use; or
( c ) When the quantity acquired exceeds the amount needed to maintain the U.S. defense mobilization base (provided the excess quantity is an economical purchase quantity). The requirement for domestic manufacture does not apply to the quantity above that required to maintain the base, in which case, qualifying country sources may compete.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the
Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Judith Carré Sutfin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|/S/    JUDITH CARRÉ SUTFIN                                
|Judith Carré Sutfin Chief Financial Officer March 16, 2009



This certification accompanies the Report
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial,
Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### West Frankfort Bank and Trust Company, appellee, v. Lee Chapman and Elma Chapman, appellants.

Action upon promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Franklin county; the Hon. C. H. Miller, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1926.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed July 9, 1926.

J. E. Carr and George Sawyer, for appellants.

Trobaugh & Church, for appellee; L. A. Cranston, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 3447.701 Foreign travel clause.

The contracting officer must insert the clause at 3452.247-70 (Foreign travel) in all solicitations and resultant cost-reimbursement contracts where foreign travel is contemplated.
KATHLEEN F. JACOBS

, Appellant,

v.

CLARKWESTERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, and TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO.

, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5312

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 4, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims

. Stephen L. Rosen , Judge

. Date of Accident: August 14, 2006.

Bradley Guy Smith of Smith, Feddeler, Smith, P.A., Lakeland, Susan W. Fox of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Orlando, and Richard W. Ervin of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee , for Appellant.

David K. Beach and Laralee M. Garvin of Rissman, Barrett, H urt, Donahue & McLain, P.A., Tampa , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

Because the appealed order adjudicated issues that were the subject of a

pending appeal, the Judge of Compensation Clai ms lacked jurisdiction under FloridaRule of Appellate Procedure 9.180(c)(1) . Accordingly, we QUASH the appealed

order.

LEWIS, C.J., RAY and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

2
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 24-1 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1461
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 24-1 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:1462
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 24-1 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:1463
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 24-1 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:1464
Login | Register

Rank By 

### Total Count Rank By



### Avg. Cost $/W Rank By



### Capacity MW back to gallery Home About Search Data Gallery My Account 

## Open PV State Rankings This visualization ranks states by the cost, count and capacity of their photovoltaic installs. Click one of the 'Rank By' buttons to sort by that column in the table. You can also click a state to find its row in the current ranking. Note that the state rankings are out of a total of 52 because the Open PV Project includes the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico as 'states ' to ensure these regions are represented in the rankings. 1 to 99 100 to 499 500 to 999 1,000 to 2,999 3,000 to 9,999 10,000 + No Data 

## Did you know? California ranks first among all states in number o f solar PV systems installed with 145,635. The next closest state, NewJersey, has only 18,350 installs. That's 127,285 installs less than Ca lifornia. 

## Legend 

# The Open PV Project

Rank State Count Cost $/W Capacity (MW) #1 CA 145635 7.08 2054.75 #2 AZ 20931 5.87 818.09 #3 NJ 18350 7.52 978.99 #4 MA 9802 6.10 244.90 #5 CT 7000 6.54 93.79 #6 NY 6954 7.43 131.08 #7 TX 4549 5.81 183.56 #8 PA 4417 6.34 129.88 #9 MD 3767 6.90 108.93 #10 CO 2584 5.81 130.32 #11 HI 2420 6.76 27.33 #12 OR 1946 5.73 38.51 #13 NM 1844 6.96 151.75 #14 DE 1687 7.73 58.38 #15 VT 1639 6.75 36.13 #16 NV 1518 6.96 214.46 #17 DC 1496 6.76 8.57 

# Page 1 of 1 The Open PV Project

- State Rankings

5/29/ 2014 https://openpv.nrel.gov/rankings
#### 3.804 Policy.

The contracting officer shall obtain certifications and disclosures as required by the provision at 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions, prior to the award of any contract exceeding $150,000.

[72 FR 46330, Aug. 17, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 53131, Aug. 30, 2010]
Honorable Susan M. Collins
Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Chairman Collins:

Thank you for your letter following the diploma mill summit. The Department 
  was pleased to take the lead in organizing the summit. We also believe that 
  it was a very productive discussion.

As you indicated in your letter, the consensus of the participants in the summit 
  was supportive of creating a "positive list" of institutions that 
  are accredited by agencies recognized by the Department of Education. Sally 
  L. Stroup, Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education, is taking the lead 
  in this effort. Her staff is currently developing a proposal to accomplish this 
  and to identify any potential challenges that will need to be addressed in making 
  information available to government personnel and others in an accurate and 
  useful form. We will maintain communication with your staff during this project.

I share your concern about the seriousness of this problem. Diploma mills and 
  the bogus degrees that they market devalue legitimate education credentials 
  and in some cases pose genuine threats to the safety and well being of Americans. 
  I applaud your willingness to call attention to this problem and look forward 
  to continued cooperation in developing an effective response to it.

Sincerely,

/s/

Rod Paige

|Last Modified: 04/14/2004
|-------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 43 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public

              

 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 17, 2023, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.
```
35.016 Broad agency announcement. ( a ) *General.* This paragraph prescribes procedures for the use of the broad agency announcement (BAA) with Peer or Scientific Review (see 6.102(d)(2)) for the acquisition of basic and applied research and that part of development not related to the development of a specific system or hardware procurement. BAAs may be used by agencies to fulfill their requirements for scientific study and experimentation directed toward advancing the state-of-the-art or increasing knowledge or understanding rather than focusing on a specific system or hardware solution. The BAA technique shall only be used when meaningful proposals with varying technical/scientific approaches can be reasonably anticipated.
( b ) The BAA, together with any supporting documents, shall— ( 1 ) Describe the agency's research interest, either for an individual program requirement or for broadly defined areas of interest covering the full range of the agency's requirements;
( 2 ) Describe the criteria for selecting the proposals, their relative importance and the method of evaluation;
( 3 ) Specify the period of time during which proposals submitted in response to the BAA will be accepted; and
( 4 ) Contain instructions for the preparation and submission of proposals.
( c ) The availability of the BAA must be publicized through the Governmentwide point of entry (GPE) and, if authorized pursuant to subpart 5.5, may also be published in noted scientific, technical, or engineering periodicals. The notice must be published no less frequently than annually.
( d ) Proposals received as a result of the BAA shall be evaluated in accordance with evaluation criteria specified therein through a peer or scientific review process. Written evaluation reports on individual proposals will be necessary but proposals need not be evaluated against each other since they are not submitted in accordance with a common work statement.
( e ) The primary basis for selecting proposals for acceptance shall be technical, importance to agency programs, and fund availability. Cost realism and reasonableness shall also be considered to the extent appropriate.
( f ) Synopsis under subpart 5.2, Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions, of individual contract actions based upon proposals received under the BAA is not required. The notice published pursuant to subparagraph (c), of this section, fulfills the synopsis requirement.
[53 FR 27467, July 20, 1988, as amended at 66 FR 27414, May 16, 2001; 68 FR 56679, Oct. 1, 2003]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**Who May Apply: (by category)** Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs)

**Who May Apply: (specifically)**

- An  Alaska Native-serving institution  may receive a grant under section 317 of the Higher Education Act (HEA) if, at the time of application, it has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 20 percent Alaska Native students.
- A  Native Hawaiian-serving institution  may receive a grant authorized under section 317 of the HEA if, at the time of application, it has an enrollment of undergraduate students that is at least 10 percent Native Hawaiian students. 

NOTE:  Applicants must first apply for and receive designation as an eligible institution.  Refer to the Tips and Assistance section on the Eligibility page to find more information, the latest webinar schedule, and/or presentations regarding eligibility.

**Services provided by the program:**

The programs assist eligible institutions of higher education to become self-sufficient by providing funds to improve and strengthen their academic quality, and institutional, management, and fiscal stability.

**List of Eligible Institutions for Title III and Title V Programs**

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov