alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Enzo Palmentola, Respondent, v. Ben Morrell, Appellant.

In an action to establish a partnership and to recover damages for breach of an alleged partnership agreement, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 13, 1964, which granted plaintiff’s motion and which appointed a temporary receiver of the property, assets, rights and obligations of said partnership. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; and plaintiff’s motion for a temporary receiver denied. Special Term found that the business would not be jeopardized if a receiver were not appointed. In view of such finding, with which we agree, there was no justification *for*the appointment of a *receiver.*The issue as to whether there was in fact a partnership must await determination on the basis of all the proof to be adduced upon a plenary trial. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Michael Homchak, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing, denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2

                                 Certifications

I, Nigel F. Penney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chaparral Resources,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
          internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 11, 2005



/s/  Nigel F. Penney
-----------------------------------------------------
Nigel F. Penney
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
25.1002 Use of foreign currency. ( a ) Unless an international agreement or the WTO GPA (see 25.408(a)(4)) requires a specific currency, contracting officers must determine whether solicitations for contracts to be entered into and performed outside the United States will require submission of offers in U.S. currency or a specified foreign currency. In unusual circumstances, the contracting officer may permit submission of offers in other than a specified currency.
( b ) To ensure a fair evaluation of offers, solicitations generally should require all offers to be priced in the same currency. However, if the solicitation permits submission of offers in other than a specified currency, the contracting officer must convert the offered prices to U.S. currency for evaluation purposes. The contracting officer must use the current market exchange rate from a commonly used source in effect as follows: ( 1 ) For acquisitions conducted using sealed bidding procedures, on the date of bid opening.
( 2 ) For acquisitions conducted using negotiation procedures— ( i ) On the date specified for receipt of offers, if award is based on initial offers; otherwise
( ii ) On the date specified for receipt of final proposal revisions.
( c ) If a contract is priced in foreign currency, the agency must ensure that adequate funds are available to cover currency fluctuations to avoid a violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act (31 U.S.C. 1341, 1342, 1511-1519).
[64 FR 72419, Dec. 27, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 1055, Jan. 7, 2004; 69 FR 77876, Dec. 28, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Calprop
Corporation and is qualified in it's entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            3,064,329
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                      68,484,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8,702,342
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   77,186,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            68,146,776
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                         10,279,935
<OTHER-SE>                                        8,855,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     77,186,854
<SALES>                                          26,164,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 26,164,559
<CGS>                                            24,916,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    24,916,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,043,135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   48,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     403,027
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 403,027
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        403,027
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .04



</TABLE>
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 367 

Condemning the Government of Iran for its violence against demonstrators 

and calling for peaceful resolution to the concerns of the citizens of Iran. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2018 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. COTTON, Mrs. ERNST, 

Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. PERDUE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the Government of Iran for its violence against 

demonstrators and calling for peaceful resolution to the 

concerns of the citizens of Iran. 

Whereas, on December 28, 2017, citizens began protesting 

the Government of Iran across the country in the cities 

and towns of Dorud, Khomaini Shahr, Najafabad, 

Qahdarijan, Tehran, and Tuyserkan; 

Whereas so far 20 people have been killed and 450 have been 

arrested since demonstrations first began; 

Whereas the United States is committed to promoting universal human rights, specifically freedom of speech and 

freedom of assembly; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 367 IS 

Whereas the Government of Iran has provided monetary support to terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and 

Hamas; and 

Whereas the citizens of Iran deserve the support of the international community in their pursuit of a democratic government that respects human rights and freedoms: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) condemns the Government of Iran— 

3 (A) for its funding of terrorist organiza4 tions and activities; 

5 (B) the continued oppression of its citi6 zens; and 

7 (C) the suppression of communication 

8 through interference with internet applications 

9 such as Instagram, Facebook, Telegram and 

10 Twitter; and 

11 (2) reaffirms— 

12 (A) the commitment of the United States 

13 to preserving and promoting the freedoms of 

14 speech and assembly as universal rights; and 

15 (B) the support of the United States for 

16 the citizens of Iran to establish a freely elected, 

17 democratic system. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2017412EN.01000402.xml

| 4.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/4

---

Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court

(2017/C 412/08)

Following his appointment as Judge at the General Court for the period from 2 April 2017 to 31 August 2019 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 29 March 2017 (1), Mr Mac Eochaidh took the oath before the Court of Justice on 8 June 2017.

Following his appointment as Judge at the General Court for the period from 15 September 2017 to 31 August 2022 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 6 September 2017 (2), Mr De Baere took the oath before the Court of Justice on 4 October 2017.

---

(1)  OJ L 89, 1.4.2017, p. 9.

(2)  OJ L 236, 14.9.2017, p. 22.

---
HILCOAST ADVISORY SERVICES, INC.
                                                                  
19146 Lyons Road, Boca Raton, FL  33434
(561) 487-9630       FAX (561) 487-4659  





                                             July 12, 1996


     Mr. Alvin Wilensky, 
     Chairman of the Board
     CV Reit, Inc.
     100 Century Blvd.
     West Palm Beach, FL 33417

          RE:  Consulting and Advisory Agreement
               ("Advisory Agreement"), dated
               July 31, 1992

     Dear Mr. Wilensky,

          This letter confirms that the above-referenced
     Advisory Agreement between CV Reit, Inc. and Hilcoast
     Advisory Services, Inc. is hereby extended through July
     31, 1997 under the same terms and conditions set forth
     in the Advisory Agreement.

                              Very truly yours,

                               /s/ Jack Jaiven

                              Jack Jaiven
                              Executive Vice President




     Agreement Acknowledged:

     CV REIT, Inc.


     By:  /s/ Alvin Wilensky
       ______________________________________
        Alvin Wilensky, Chairman of the Board

     Dated:  August 8, 1996
           __________________________________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 1, 2015

t0624

Order 

Clerk

July 1, 2015

150625-6 & (76)

DANIEL BUTTON,

Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee,

and

SPECIAL TREE REHABILITATION SYSTEM,

Intervening Plaintiff,

v SC: 150625-6

COA: 314836, 319312 

Wayne CC: 10-006165-NF

PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant/

Cross-Defendant-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee, 

and

QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/

Cross-Defendant-Appellee/

Cross-Appellant,

and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/

Cross-Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## Recipients 

2 CFR 200.1 "Recipient" means an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities that receives a Federal award directly from a Federal awarding agency. The term recipient does not include subrecipients or individuals that are beneficiaries of the award.

The       cognizant agency for indirect costs means the Federal agency responsible for reviewing, negotiating, and approving cost allocation plans or indirect cost proposals developed under this part on behalf of all Federal agencies. The cognizant agency for indirect cost is not necessarily the same as the cognizant agency for audit. For assignments of cognizant agencies see the following: 

-  For Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) :           Appendix III to this part, paragraph C.11. 
-  For nonprofit organizations :           Appendix IV to this part, paragraph C.2.a. 
-  For State and local governments :           Appendix V to this part, paragraph F.1. 
2 CFR Appendix-V-to-Part-200 F.1. "Department of Education"  The United States Department of Education is designated the cognizant agency for indirect costs by the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB):           **State Education Agencies (SEA)** - the United States Department Education Indirect Cost Division will review, negotiate, and approve the indirect cost rates.          **Local Education Agencies (LEA) and School Districts** - indirect cost rate review, negotiate, and approval are delegated to State Education Agencies (SEA) per 34 CFR 75.561(b) &          34 CFR 76.561(b).           
-  For Indian tribes:  Appendix VII to this part, paragraph D.1.   

## Subrecipients 

2 CFR 200.1 "Subrecipient" means an entity, usually but not limited to non-Federal entities, that receives a subaward from a       pass-through entity to carry out part of a Federal award; but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such award. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency.

2 CFR 200.332(a)(4) 

-   
An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate negotiated between the subrecipient and the Federal Government. If no approved rate exists, the pass-through entity must determine the appropriate rate in collaboration with the subrecipient, which is either:
-  The negotiated indirect cost rate between the pass-through entity and the subrecipient; which can be based on a prior negotiated rate between a different                 PTE  and the same subrecipient. If basing the rate on a previously negotiated rate, the pass-through entity is not required to collect information justifying this rate, but may elect to do so;
-  The                 de minimis indirect cost rate .
(ii) The pass-through entity must not require use of a de minimis indirect cost rate if the subrecipient has a Federally approved rate. Subrecipients can elect to use the cost allocation method to account for indirect costs in accordance with             
§ 200.405(d)
.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cybrdi Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yanbiao Bai, the
chief executive officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                         /s/Yanbiao Bai
                                         --------------
                                         Name:  Yanbiao Bai, CEO and President
                                         Date: May 21, 2007
#### George Rusciano et al., Respondents, v. 1961 Associates, Inc., et al., Appellants. 1961 Associates, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Abraham J. Rodolitz et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

— Order granting summary judgment to plaintiffs and granting cross motion of the defendant and third-party plaintiff for summary judgment over against defendants Fuchs and Wexler and third-party defendant Rodolitz, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs to plaintiffs-respondents against defendants-appellants and, with $50 costs to third-party plaintiff-respondent against third-party defendants-appellants. Concur— Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Simon K Gill , Chief Executive Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
          ended September 30, 2004 ("Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

     2.   All of the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
          of operations of the company.



Date: November 11, 2004




/s/  Simon K. Gill
-----------------------
Simon K. Gill
Chief Executive Officer
#### 209.104-70 Solicitation provision.

Use the provision at 252.209-7002, Disclosure of Ownership or Control by a Foreign Government, in all solicitations, including those subject to the procedures in FAR part 13, when access to proscribed information is necessary for contract performance. If the solicitation includes the provision at FAR 52.204-7, do not separately list the provision 252.209-7002 in the solicitation.

[79 FR 73489, Dec. 11, 2014]
# C_2018301EN.01000101.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 301/01)

Last publication

OJ C 294, 20.8.2018

Past publications

OJ C 285, 13.8.2018

OJ C 276, 6.8.2018

OJ C 268, 30.7.2018

OJ C 259, 23.7.2018

OJ C 249, 16.7.2018

OJ C 240, 9.7.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
NFES 2010-905 

Forum Purpose To Improve the quality, comparability, and utility of elementary and secondary education data. Forum Mission To develop and recommend strategies for building quality education data systems that will support local, state, and federal efforts to improve elementary and secondary education throughout the United States. Forum Goals 

I. Develop a comprehensive system of comparable local, 

state, and federal basic data elements useful for education decisionmaking at all levels of government. 

II. Improve coordination, integration, and consolidation 

of the collection of quality education data. 

III. Promote the Forum as a widely recognized cooperative body addressing issues of education 

data policy, and a leader in setting data standards. 

http://nces.ed.gov/forum
Exhibit 10.55

                                                                        January 16, 2002

Mr. Stephen M. Wolf
Posting an FDMS Docket without a Federal Register Notice

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Posting EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0399 to Regulations.gov for Public Access

FROM: Joe DeSantis /s/

ORD/NCEA/IRIS

Thru: Vincent Cogliano /s/ Karen Hammerstrom for 

Director, IRIS Division

ORD/NCEA

This memorandum authorizes the posting of EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0399 to 

Regulations.gov for public access.

This docket will be opened to solicit public comment for the external review draft human 

health assessment titled “Toxicological Review of Ammonia: In Support of Summary 

Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)” (EPA/635/R-11/013C). 

The draft assessment was prepared by the National Center for Environmental Assessment 

(NCEA) within the EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD). EPA is releasing 

this draft assessment for the purposes of public comment and peer review. This draft 

assessment is not final as described in EPA’s information quality guidelines, and it does 

not represent and should not be construed to represent Agency policy and views. 

This docket will be open for public comments from 06/04/2012 to 08/07/2012. A Federal 

Register Notice announcing the public comment period will be posted on this docket 

when it is published. 

The draft “Toxicological Review of Ammonia: In Support of Summary Information on 

the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)” is available primarily via the Internet on 

the NCEA home page under the Recent Additions and Publications menus at 

http://www.epa.gov/ncea. A limited number of paper copies are available from the 

Information Management Team, NCEA; telephone: 703-347-8561; facsimile: 703-347-

8691. If you request a paper copy, please provide your name, mailing address, and the 

document title.