alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 19 (Monday, February 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Strategic 
Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC, 
pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel; (SEP)--CE21-001: Rigorous Evaluation of 
Policies for their Impacts on the Primary Prevention of Multiple Forms 
of Violence.
    Date: June 8-9, 2021.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Videoconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Mikel Walters, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, 
4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop F-63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, 
Telephone (404) 639-0913, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#713c26101d05140302311215125f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ec3d9efe2faebfcfdceedeaeda0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2021-02052 Filed 1-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted July 25, 2007

Decided July 26, 2007

Before

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

No. 06-3643

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

OMARI ANDREWS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division

No. 04-CR-860-1

Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, 

Judge.

O R D E R

Omari Andrews pleaded guilty to one count of possessing crack with intent to

distribute, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and one count of possessing a firearm in

furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). In his plea

agreement Andrews waived any right to appeal his convictions or sentences, but he

nevertheless filed a notice of appeal. His appointed lawyer now moves to withdraw

because he cannot discern a nonfrivolous basis for the appeal. See Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Andrews has not accepted our invitation to

comment on counsel’s motion. See Cir. R. 51(b). Because counsel’s supporting brief

is facially adequate, we limit our review to the potential issues identified by

counsel. See United States v. Tabb, 125 F.3d 583, 584 (7th Cir. 1997).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 06-3643 Page 2

Andrews promised in his plea agreement to forego challenging his convictions

or sentences so long as the district court sentenced him within the statutory

maximum and ran the federal terms of imprisonment concurrent with Andrews’s

prior undischarged state term of imprisonment. Andrews was subject to a

maximum of 40 years’ imprisonment on the drug count, see 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b)(1)(B)(iii), and life on the firearm count, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). The

district court sentenced him to a total of 97 months (which was 50 months below the

guidelines range) to run concurrently with his state sentence. Accordingly,

Andrews is bound by the appeal waiver unless he wants his entire plea agreement

set aside. See United States v. Whitlow, 287 F.3d 638, 640 (7th Cir. 2002); United

States v. Hare, 269 F.3d 859, 860 (7th Cir. 2001) (explaining that a “waiver of

appeal is valid, and must be enforced, unless the agreement in which it is contained

is annulled”). And counsel advises that Andrews does not seek this relief.

To the extent that counsel considers whether Andrews could challenge the

execution of his sentence, counsel is correct that the issue would be beyond the

scope of direct appeal. See Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 629 (7th Cir. 2000)

(explaining that challenges to duration of prisoner’s confinement must be brought

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 after exhaustion of administrative remedies).

We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal.
3.907-2 Policy. Non-Federal employers are prohibited from discharging, demoting, or otherwise discriminating against an employee as a reprisal for disclosing covered information to any of the following entities or their representatives: ( 1 ) The Board.
( 2 ) An Inspector General.
( 3 ) The Comptroller General.
( 4 ) A member of Congress.
( 5 ) A State or Federal regulatory or law enforcement agency.
( 6 ) A person with supervisory authority over the employee or such other person working for the employer who has the authority to investigate, discover, or terminate misconduct.
( 7 ) A court or grand jury.
( 8 ) The head of a Federal agency.
[74 FR 14634, Mar. 31, 2009]
Order entered January 11, 2021

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00631

- CR

BABLOO JOHN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Cou nty Criminal Court No. 9

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB17

- 63534

- K

O RDER

Before the Court is the State ’ s January 7 , 2021 second motion for an

extension of time to file it s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief

received with the mot ion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 5, 2017

s0928 

# Order

Clerk October 5, 2017

155425

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155425

COA: 336153

Oakland CC: 2015

- 256561

- FH

ANTONIO ANDERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED , because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### 3006.303 Justifications.
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:120
Case: 1:12-cr-00225 Document #: 39 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:120
#### 3052.222-71 Strikes or picketing affecting access to a DHS facility.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3022.101-71(b), insert the following clause:

# Strikes or Picketing Affecting Access to a DHS Facility (DEC 2003)

If the Contracting Officer notifies the Contractor in writing that a strike or picketing: (a) is directed at the Contractor or subcontractor or any employee of either; and (b) impedes or threatens to impede access by any person to a DHS facility where the site of the work is located, the Contractor shall take all appropriate action to end such strike or picketing, including, if necessary, the filing of a charge of unfair labor practice with the National Labor Relations Board or the use of other available judicial or administrative remedies.

(End of clause)
33.215 Contract clauses. ( a ) Insert the clause at 52.233-1, Disputes, in solicitations and contracts, unless the conditions in 33.203(b) apply. If it is determined under agency procedures that continued performance is necessary pending resolution of any claim arising under or relating to the contract, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its *Alternate I.*
( b ) Insert the clause at 52.233-4 in all solicitations and contracts.
[69 FR 59700, Oct. 5, 2004]
# C_2018268EN.01000101.xml

| 30.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 268/01)

Last publication

OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

Past publications

OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

OJ C 221, 25.6.2018.

OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.

OJ C 200, 11.6.2018.

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 252.209-7011 Representation for Restriction on the Use of Certain Institutions of Higher Education.

As prescribed in 209.170-4, use the following provision:

# Representation for Restriction on the Use of Certain Institutions of Higher Education (Oct 2023)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this provision—

*Confucius Institute* means a cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the government of the People's Republic of China.

*Institution of higher educati*on has the meaning given in 20 U.S.C. 1002.

(b) *Restriction.* As required by section 1062 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283), DoD may not award a contract with any institution of higher education that hosts a Confucius Institute. Section 1062 prohibits DoD from providing funding to any U.S. institution of higher education hosting a Confucius Institute unless that institution receives a waiver from the Department of Defense Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (OUSD(R&E)). See the OUSD(R&E) Confucius Institute Waiver Program Guidance to U.S. Institutions of Higher Education at *https://rt.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/Confucius-Institute-Waiver-Program-Guidance-28Mar2023.pdf.*

(c) *Representation.* By submission of an offer, the Offeror represents that—

(1) It is not an institution of higher education that hosts a Confucius Institute; or

(2) The Offeror has obtained a waiver approved by OUSD(R&E).

(End of provision)

[88 FR 67609, Sept. 29, 2023]
# C_2018005EN.01000101.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 005/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 437, 18.12.2017

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 424, 11.12.2017

OJ C 412, 4.12.2017

OJ C 402, 27.11.2017

OJ C 392, 20.11.2017

OJ C 382, 13.11.2017

OJ C 374, 6.11.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT




     This First Amendment to Consulting Agreement (this “Amendment”) dated as of October
30, 2009 is by and between AptarGroup, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
Carl Siebel Consulting GmbH (the “Consultant”).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant have entered into that certain Consulting Agreement
dated as of October 17, 2007 and effective as of January 1, 2008 (the “Consulting
Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant desire to amend the term of the Consulting Agreement
as set forth herein.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and of other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto,
the parties intending to be legally bound hereby agree as follows:



AGREEMENT




     1. Section 1 (Term of Agreement). Section 1 of the Consulting Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




The Company hereby agrees to retain the Consultant as a consultant, and the
Consultant hereby agrees to be retained by the Company, upon the terms and subject
to the conditions hereof for the period commencing on January 1, 2008 (the
“Effective Date”) and ending on June 30, 2010, unless earlier terminated
pursuant to Section 5 hereof.



     2. Effect on the Consulting Agreement. (a) On and after the date hereof, each
reference in the Consulting Agreement to “this Agreement”, “herein”, “hereof”, “hereunder” or words
of similar import shall mean and be a reference to the Consulting Agreement as amended hereby.



     (b) Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Consulting Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect and the Consulting Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby
ratified and confirmed in all respects. Upon the execution and delivery hereof, the Consulting
Agreement shall thereupon be deemed to be amended as hereinabove set forth as fully and with the
same effect as if the amendment made hereby was originally set forth in the Consulting Agreement,
and this Amendment and the Consulting Agreement shall henceforth be read, taken and construed as
one and the same instrument, but such amendments and supplements shall not operate so as to render
invalid or improper any action heretofore taken under the Consulting Agreement.



[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]




 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this First Amendment to Consulting
Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AptarGroup, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Peter Pfeiffer	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name: Peter Pfeiffer
	 	 
	 	 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Carl Siebel Consulting GmbH	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Carl A. Siebel	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name: Carl A. Siebel	 	 
	 	 	Title: Geschäftsführer	 	 







2
326.607-3 Award in the Face of Challenge. ( a ) Award of a contract in the face of challenge only may be made on the basis of the CO's written determination that the challenged offeror's representation is valid. ( 1 ) This determination is final unless it is appealed to DAP, and the CO is notified of the appeal before award.
( 2 ) If an award was made before the CO received notice of appeal, the contract is presumed to be valid.
( b ) After receiving a challenge involving an offeror being considered for award, the CO must not award the contract until the CO has determined the validity of the representation. Award may be made in the face of a timely challenge when the CO determines in writing that an award must be made to protect the public interest, is urgently required, or a prompt award will otherwise be advantageous to the Government.
( c ) If a timely challenge on representation is filed with the CO and received before award in response to a specific offer and solicitation, the CO must notify eligible offerors within one day that the award will be withheld. The CO also may ask eligible offerors to extend the period for acceptance of their proposals.
( d ) If a challenge on representation is filed with the CO and received after award in response to a specific offer and solicitation, the CO need not suspend contract performance or terminate the awarded contract unless the CO believes that an award may be invalidated and a delay would prejudice the Government's interest. However, if contract performance is to be suspended, the CO would follow those guidelines as outlined in FAR Part 49.
# C_2017194EN.01003201.xml

| 17.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/32

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 June 2017

(2017/C 194/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1167 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87453 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7370 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0885 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,233 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,91 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2184 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5835 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9225 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4683 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4766 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7108 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5441 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5457 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 265,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,3831 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6089 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3995 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 849,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7756 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,614 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,2300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,923 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6681 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,0887 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,9515 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1167

JPY

Japanese yen

124,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87453

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7370

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0885

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,233

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,91

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2184

RON

Romanian leu

4,5835

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9225

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4683

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4766

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7108

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5441

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5457

KRW

South Korean won

1 265,35

ZAR

South African rand

14,3831

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6089

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3995

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 849,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7756

PHP

Philippine peso

55,614

RUB

Russian rouble

64,2300

THB

Thai baht

37,923

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6681

MXN

Mexican peso

20,0887

INR

Indian rupee

71,9515

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2017117EN.01000501.xml

| 12.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 April 2017

(2017/C 117/06)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0616 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4372 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85330 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5915 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0696 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1245 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,658 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,40 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2414 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5104 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9392 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4137 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4139 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2499 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5285 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4904 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 214,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6891 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3256 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4240 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 099,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7066 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,631 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 60,4528 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,726 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3241 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8434 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,4550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0616

JPY

Japanese yen

117,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4372

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85330

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5915

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0696

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1245

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,658

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,40

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2414

RON

Romanian leu

4,5104

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9392

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4137

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4139

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2499

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5285

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4904

KRW

South Korean won

1 214,50

ZAR

South African rand

14,6891

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3256

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4240

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 099,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7066

PHP

Philippine peso

52,631

RUB

Russian rouble

60,4528

THB

Thai baht

36,726

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3241

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8434

INR

Indian rupee

68,4550

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT  23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Prospectus
constituting  part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-40729) and
to  the  incorporation  by  reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos.  333-64989,  333-56677,  333-51903,  333-43595,  333-42375,  333-34743,
333-34699,  333-31265, 33-44115, 33-31819, 33-23504, 33-7499, 2-89925, 33-10106,
33-38044, 33-16987, 33-62603) of Compaq Computer Corporation of our report dated
January  26,  1999,  except  as  to  Note  14  which is as of February 16, 1999,
appearing on page 26 of Compaq Computer Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for  the  year  ended  December  31,  1998.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS  LLP
Houston,  Texas
February  23,  1999

<PAGE>
H. Con. Res. 85 Agreed to April 10, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO 

PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO ‘‘ROSIE THE 

RIVETER’’. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor 

Center is authorized to be used on April 10, 2024, for a ceremony 

to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively to the women 

in the United States who joined the workforce during World War 

II, providing the aircraft, vehicles, weaponry, ammunition, and 

other material to win the war and who were referred to as ‘‘Rosie 

the Riveter’’, in recognition of their contributions to the United 

States and the inspiration they have provided to ensuing generations. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the conduct of 

the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in 

accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol 

may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.