alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

                                  Fredco, LLC.
                                  P.O. Box 365
                               Hosston, La. 71043

                                September 9, 2009


Avro Energy, Inc.
9 Church Lane
Copthorne, West Sussex
England RH310 3PT

Dear Sir:

Fredco, LLC. does hereby agree to convey, assign and deliver a 80% Net Revenue
Interest in and to that certain oil, gas, and mineral leases referred to as the
Muslow A, B, and C Lease; and all its rights, title and interest in the Caddo
Levee Board Lease; to the base of the Paluxy Formation; together with all wells
and equipment located thereon and pertaining thereto for the payment of Seventy
Thousand ($70,000.00) Dollars payable as follows: $35,000.00 non-refundable
payment due October 20, 2009, and the balance of $35,000.00 due November 30,
2009. Failure to pay as stated by November 30, 2009, shall ipso facto cancel
this agreement and all rights revert back to Fredco, LLC.

This sublease is made without warranty. Fredco, LLC has owned, possessed, and
operated said lease peaceable and to its knowledge and belief no current
problems exist as to the working interest ownership in this lease. Fredco, LLC
does hereby state that it has been in compliance with the Louisiana Conservation
Rules and Regulations, and to its knowledge and belief knows of no environmental
issues pending or violations against said lease.

Very truly yours,

`Fred Sarkozi`

Fred Sarkozi
Manager, Fredco, LLC

I hereby agree to the above terms and conditions in this letter of agreement
dated September 9, 2009, signed this 9th day of September, 2009.

`Donny Fitzgerald`

Donny Fitzgerald
Director, Avro Energy, Inc.
(March 30, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William C. Winston, Appellant.

Motion by the District Attorney of Nassau County to dismiss defendant’s appeal from a judgment of conviction. Motion denied, with leave to renew upon proof of service of the motion papers upon the defendant personally, as well as upon his attorney of record. The new section *984537-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires that on a motion to dismiss an appeal the motion papers shall be served upon the defendant personally. Beldock, P. J., TJghetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 48 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 48

   Condemning the Chinese Communist Party for the Wuhan Lab ``leak'' 
                 causing the deadly COVID-19 pandemic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2023

  Mr. Santos submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Condemning the Chinese Communist Party for the Wuhan Lab ``leak'' 
                 causing the deadly COVID-19 pandemic.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress condemns the Chinese Communist Party as responsible for--
            (1) the Wuhan Lab ``leak'' causing the deadly COVID-19 
        pandemic to damage the United States economy, national 
        security, and public health; and
            (2) the resulting deaths of over 1,000,000 Americans.
                                 <all>
```
2815.605 Content of unsolicited proposals. To ensure against contracts between DOJ and prospective offers that would exceed the limits of advance guidance set forth in FAR 15.604 and potentially result in an unfair advantage to an offeror, the offeror of an unsolicited proposal must include the following warranty in any unsolicited proposal. Contracting officers receiving an unsolicited proposal without this warranty shall not process the proposal until the offeror is notified and given an opportunity to submit a proper warranty. If no warranty is provided in a reasonable time, the contracting officer shall reject the unsolicited proposal and notify the offeror of the rejection and the reason therefore. The warranty must be signed by a responsible management official of the proposing organization authorized to contractually obligate the organization. UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL WARRANTY BY OFFEROR This is to warrant that— ( a ) This proposal has not been prepared under Government supervision;
( b ) The methods and approaches stated in the proposal were developed by this offeror;
( c ) Any contact with DOJ personnel has been with the limits of appropriate advance guidance set forth in FAR 15.604; and,
( d ) No prior commitments were received from DOJ personnel regarding acceptance of this proposal.
Date: Organization: Name: Title:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

(1) a part B institution (a historically Black college or university) (§322 of the HEA, 20 U.S.C. §1061);(2) a Hispanic-serving institution (§502 of the HEA, 20 U.S.C. §1101a);(3) a Tribal College or University (§316 of the HEA, 20 U.S.C. §1059c);(4) an Alaska Native-serving institution or a Native Hawaiian-serving institution (§317(b) of the HEA, 20 U.S.C. §1059d(b);(5) a Predominantly Black Institution (§§318(b) and 371(c)(9) of the HEA; 20 U.S.C. §§ 1059e(b) and 1067q(c)(9));(6) an Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-serving institution (§§ 320(b) and 371(c)(2) of the HEA, 20 U.S.C. §§1059g(b) and 1067q(c)(2); or(7) a Native American-serving nontribal institution (§§319(b) and 371(c)(8) of the HEA; 20 U.S.C. §§ 1059f(b) and 1067q(c)(8). 

FIPSE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 323.7101 Applicability.

It is HHS policy to include a solicitation provision and to include an evaluation factor for an offeror's Sustainable Action Plan when acquiring sustainable products and services. This applies only to new contracts and orders above the micro-purchase threshold. Such contracts and orders include, but are not limited to: Office supplies; construction, renovation or repair; building operations and maintenance; landscaping services; pest management; electronic equipment, including leasing; fleet maintenance; janitorial services; laundry services; cafeteria operations; and meetings and conference services. If using a product or service code designated for supplies or services having sustainable acquisition attributes but a review of the requirement determines that no opportunity exists to acquire sustainable acquisition supplies or services, document the determination in the contract file and make note in the solicitation.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 124 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 515
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 124

                          [Report No. 118-617]

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
   Comptroller of the Currency relating to ``Principles for Climate-
 Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2024

Mr. Donalds (for himself, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Perry, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Weber of 
Texas, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Meuser, and Mr. Huizenga) submitted the following 
  joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

                             July 30, 2024

  Additional sponsors: Mr. Steil, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. Hill, and Mr. Barr

                             July 30, 2024

   Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
                    Union and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
   Comptroller of the Currency relating to ``Principles for Climate-
 Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 
relating to ``Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management 
for Large Financial Institutions'' (88 Fed. Reg. 74183; published 
October 30, 2023), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 515

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 124

                          [Report No. 118-617]

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
   Comptroller of the Currency relating to ``Principles for Climate-
 Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 30, 2024

   Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
                    Union and ordered to be printed
```
777

U.S. Department of Energy June 1999

EMISSION RESULTS FOR WATER HEATERS

The water heater environmental analysis uses a variant of EIA's National Energy

Modeling System (NEMS), called NEMS-EPCA. Although NEMS-EPCA only forecasts through

2020, the National Energy Savings (NES) from the proposed appliance standards are provided

through 2030. Results are therefore, presented cumulatively through 2020 as well as through

2030. The extrapolation to 2030 keeps emission reductions constant from 2020 to 2030. The

cumulative emissions reductions are summed over the power and household sectors. The annual

carbon emission reductions range up to 3.0 Mt in 2030 and the NO, emissions reductions extend

up to 6.0 kt by 2030.',2 Cumulative emission savings from 2003-2020 and from 2003-2030 are

presented in the following tables:

Cumulative Emissions Reductions 2003- 2020: Household and Power Sectors

Trial Standard

Emission 1 2 3 4

Carbon (Mt) 8.6 27.1 43.5 85.0*

NOx (kt) 29.6 91.8 147.3 206.8*

SO2 (kt) 1.9t 9.9t 20.9t 25.8t

Cumulative Emissions Reductions 2003- 2030: Household and Power Sectors

Trial Standard

Emission 1 2 3 4

Carbon (Mt)

NOx (kt)

So2 (kt) z Ad 

*Results only include household emissions reductions because the overall difference in electricity generation for

imposed water heater standard 4 is tiny, yielding marginal emission rates that are highly unstable and possess a

low level of confidence.

t Results only include household emissions reductions because SO 2 emissions from power plants are capped by

clean air legislation, implying emissions will only be negligibly affected by possible water heater standards.

'Mt = Million metric tons

2kt = Thousand metric tons

1

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 77J
# C_2017013EN.01000101.xml

| 14.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 January 2017

(2017/C 13/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0661 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4350 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87548 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4875 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0728 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0580 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3739 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4922 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0387 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4225 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4010 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2672 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4952 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5206 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4082 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3564 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5270 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 212,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7569 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,962 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,2685 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,740 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4097 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0860 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,6685 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0661

JPY

Japanese yen

121,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4350

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87548

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4875

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0728

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0580

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3739

RON

Romanian leu

4,4922

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0387

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4225

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4010

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2672

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4952

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5206

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,45

ZAR

South African rand

14,4082

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3564

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5270

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 212,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7569

PHP

Philippine peso

52,962

RUB

Russian rouble

63,2685

THB

Thai baht

37,740

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4097

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0860

INR

Indian rupee

72,6685

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.



Exhibit 99(a)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-KSB of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Harold C. Rauner,
President and Chief Executive Officer of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1) |  | such Form 10-kSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in such Form 10-KSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Harold C. Rauner                               
|Harold C. Rauner President and Chief Executive Officer
#### 31.205-9 [Reserved]
# SIP 2015 Awards
32.605 Final decisions. ( a ) The contracting officer shall issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if— ( 1 ) The contracting officer and the contractor are unable to reach agreement on the existence or amount of a debt in a timely manner;
( 2 ) The contractor fails to liquidate a debt previously demanded by the contracting officer within the timeline specified in the demand for payment unless the amounts were not repaid because the contractor has requested an installment payment agreement; or
( 3 ) The contractor requests a deferment of collection on a debt previously demanded by the contracting officer (see 32.607-2).
( b ) If a demand for payment was previously issued for the debt, the demand for payment included in the final decision shall identify the same due date as the original demand for payment.
( c ) The contracting officer shall— ( 1 ) Furnish the decision to the contractor by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by any other method that provides evidence of receipt; and
( 2 ) Forward a copy to the payment office identified in the contract.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 20-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF JOHN C. BOYD FOR

ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF

MONTANA

FILED

AUG 1 2 2020

Bowen 

Clerk Greenwood of Supreme Court O oit f

ERMnntana

John C. Boyd has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana

pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on

Character and Fitness has certified that Boyd has provided the necessary documentation

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions

Administrator, John C. Boyd may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana.

Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk of the

Montana Supreme Court.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State

B ar of Montana.

DATED this I a-- day of August, 2020.

Chief Justice

08/12/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005
1 /.4r.44'5%

Justices414.,
# C_2017239EN.01000101.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 239/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 231, 17.7.2017

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 221, 10.7.2017

OJ C 213, 3.7.2017

OJ C 202, 26.6.2017

OJ C 195, 19.6.2017

OJ C 178, 6.6.2017

OJ C 168, 29.5.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2016372EN.01000302.xml

| 11.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8119 — DIF/Électricité de France/Thyssengas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 372/06)

On 12 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8119. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8119. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
246.704 Authority for use of warranties. ( 1 ) The chief of the contracting office must approve use of a warranty, except in acquisitions for— ( i ) Commercial products or commercial services (*see* FAR 46.709);
( ii ) Technical data, unless the warranty provides for extended liability (*see* 246.708);
( iii ) Supplies and services in fixed-price type contracts containing quality assurance provisions that reference higher-level contract quality requirements (*see* 246.202-4); or
( iv ) Supplies and services in construction contracts when using the warranties that are contained in Federal, military, or construction guide specifications.
( 2 ) The chief of the contracting office shall approve the use of a warranty only when the benefits are expected to outweigh the cost.
[71 FR 27647, May 12, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 6588, Jan. 31, 2023]