alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017027EN.01001201.xml

| 27.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 January 2017

(2017/C 27/09)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0700 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4367 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85143 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4660 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0693 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9215 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,98 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3435 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4943 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1361 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4205 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4048 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3006 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4793 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5228 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 248,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,3102 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3634 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4800 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 315,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7390 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,373 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,7269 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,776 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4093 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,4760 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,9570 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0700

JPY

Japanese yen

122,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4367

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85143

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4660

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0693

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9215

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,98

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3435

RON

Romanian leu

4,4943

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1361

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4205

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4048

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3006

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4793

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5228

KRW

South Korean won

1 248,14

ZAR

South African rand

14,3102

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3634

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4800

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 315,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7390

PHP

Philippine peso

53,373

RUB

Russian rouble

64,7269

THB

Thai baht

37,776

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4093

MXN

Mexican peso

22,4760

INR

Indian rupee

72,9570

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2019055EN.01000501.xml

| 12.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 February 2019

(2019/C 55/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1309 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4637 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87615 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4858 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1351 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8190 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,836 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 319,66 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3158 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7405 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,9588 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5983 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5005 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8750 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6768 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5364 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 272,60 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5344 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6781 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 924,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6056 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,974 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,1735 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,533 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2270 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5907 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,4480 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1309

JPY

Japanese yen

124,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4637

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87615

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4858

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1351

ISK

Iceland króna

136,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8190

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,836

HUF

Hungarian forint

319,66

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3158

RON

Romanian leu

4,7405

TRY

Turkish lira

5,9588

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5983

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5005

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8750

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6768

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5364

KRW

South Korean won

1 272,60

ZAR

South African rand

15,5344

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6781

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 924,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6056

PHP

Philippine peso

58,974

RUB

Russian rouble

74,1735

THB

Thai baht

35,533

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2270

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5907

INR

Indian rupee

80,4480

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 252.225-7007 Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Items from Communist Chinese Military Companies.

As prescribed in 225.1103(4), use the following clause:

# Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Items From Communist Chinese Military Companies (DEC 2018)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*600 series of the Commerce Control List* means the series of 5-character export control classification numbers (ECCNs) of the Commerce Control List of the Export Administration Regulations in 15 CFR part 774, supplement no. 1, that have a “6” as the third character. The 600 series constitutes the munitions and munitions-related ECCNs within the larger Commerce Control List. (See definition of “600 series” in 15 CFR 772.)

*Communist Chinese military company* means any entity, regardless of geographic location, that is—

(1) A part of the commercial or defense industrial base of the People's Republic of China (including a subsidiary or affiliate of such entity); or

(2) Owned or controlled by, or affiliated with, an element of the Government or armed forces of the People's Republic of China.

*Item* means—

(1) A USML defense article, as defined at 22 CFR 120.6;

(2) A USML defense service, as defined at 22 CFR 120.9; or

(3) A 600 series item, as defined at 15 CFR 772.1.

*United States Munitions List* means the munitions list of the International Traffic in Arms Regulation in 22 CFR part 121.

(b) Any items covered by the United States Munitions List or the 600 series of the Commerce Control List that are delivered under this contract may not be acquired, directly or indirectly, from a Communist Chinese military company.

(c) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts for items covered by the United States Munitions List or the 600 series of the Commerce Control List.

(End of clause)

[83 FR 66073, Dec. 21, 2018]
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Wyndham International, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and
accompanies this annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Wyndham International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Elizabeth Schroeder, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 16, 2005



/S/    ELIZABETH
SCHROEDERName:    Elizabeth Schroeder




Subscribed and sworn to before me

this 16th day of May 2005.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|/S/    VITA
BRANCH                          
|Name:    Vita Branch Title:    Notary Public



My
commission expires: 12-6-08



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 21, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00475-CV CHARLES L. NORTON, Appellant V. CENTILLION PARTNERS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-05499 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee and appellant’s brief in this case are past due. By postcards dated April 9, 2013 and July 8, 2013, we notified appe llant the $175 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated April 9, 2013, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. By postcard dated June 10, 2013, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his brief and an extens ion motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his brief and an extens ion motion would result in the di smissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid th e filing fee, filed his brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

130475F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
CHARLES L. NORTON, Appellant
No. 05-13-00475-CV V. CENTILLION PARTNERS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-05499. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee CENTILLION PARTNERS, INC. recover its costs of this appeal from appellan t CHARLES L. NORTON.
Judgment entered March 21, 2014

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Key Staff

**Division Director:**Vicki Robinson, Ed.D., 202-453-7907

**Program Officers:**

Program Lead: Bernadette Miles, MBA, 202-453-7892 (Assigned States:  ALL)

**Mailing Address:**U.S. Department of Education, OPEHigher Education Programs, Institutional ServiceTitle III Part B, Strengthening HBGI Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Mail Stop:  LBJ-HEP-2C206Washington, DC 20202

Email:  hbgi.phaseii@ed.gov

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 58140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23059]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-18]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:
    Location: FDIC--550 17th Street NW., Room MB-5085, Washington, DC 
20429.
    Date: September 27, 2012.
    Time: Immediately following the ASC open session.
    Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

July 11, 2012 minutes--Closed Session.
August 8, 2012 minutes--Closed Session.
Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews.

    Dated: September 14, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-23059 Filed 9-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### In re Tom RUBIN, d/b/a Tom Rubin & Associates, Movant-Appellant.

No. 82-2104.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 7, 1982.

*30Stephen D. Drushall, Los Angeles, Cal., for movant-appellant.

James D. Skaggs, Business Manager, Gaylord Broadcasting Co., Edith H. Jones, Houston, Tex., for KHTV-TV.

Before BROWN, POLITZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Tom Rubin, doing business as Tom Rubin and Associates, is the subject of a bankruptcy proceeding now pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California.

On January 22, 1982, Rubin initiated discovery proceedings involving KHTV-TV, Houston, Texas, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. KHTV is not a petitioning creditor in the proceedings.

The district judge denied the discovery motion on February 2, 1982. On March 4, 1982, Rubin filed notice of appeal. KHTV moves to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that (1) the district court order denying discovery is an interlocutory order and is non-appealable, and (2) the appeal is moot. We deny the motion to dismiss the appeal.

(1) It is true that normally the action by the district court on a discovery motion is interlocutory and not appealable. *Honig v. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co., Inc.,*404 F.2d 410 (5th Cir. 1968). But of importance in the circumstances of this case is the requirement under Rule 37(a)(1), Fed. R.Civ.P., that the motion for discovery was required to be filed in the Southern District of Texas. Since KHTV is not a party to the bankruptcy in California, the only way in which the order of the district court denying discovery can be appealed is to this Court. If this appeal is dismissed there is no review of the district court order. Under these circumstances, appeal from such an order should lie. *See Marine Petroleum Co. v. Champlin Petroleum Co.,*641 F.2d 984, 987 n.3 (D.C.Cir.1979); *National Life Ins. Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.,*615 F.2d 595, 597 (3rd Cir. 1980).

We find that the denial of the discovery motion in this case is appealable.

(2) The claim of mootness is based upon a March 10,1982, final cut off date for discovery established by the bankruptcy court. The district court entered its order on February 2, 1982. The notice of appeal was timely filed on March 4, 1982. The order of the bankruptcy court cannot cut off a timely right to appeal. Similar appeals and proceedings are pending in other circuits. The appeal is not moot.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of appellee KHTV-TV to dismiss the appeal is DENIED.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, A.C. RUGH, D.A. NORKIN

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DANTON A. OLIVER

AIRMAN (E-3), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201600023

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 24 November 2015.

Military Judge: CAPT Paul C. Leblanc, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS VINSON (CVN 

70).

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LCDR D.J. Hammond, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: LCDR Derek Hampton, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

19 April 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 

After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

 

 For the Court 

 R.H. TROIDL 

 Clerk of Court
- **618 Data Home**
      - Collection Documents
      - State Level Data Files
      - Static Tables 

### U.S. Department of Education Publicly Available Data Sources

      - Elementary/Secondary Information System  ( ElSi )
      - Ed Data Express
      - Civil Rights Data Collection
       
      - Part B and C Data Profiles:
      *IDEA* Part B Profiles
*IDEA* Part C Profiles

       
      - OSEP Fast Facts
      Children Identified With Autism
 (Updated: March 2024)
OSEP Fast Facts: Children Identified with Intellectual Disability
 (September 2023)
IDEA Section 618 Data Collected on Children with Disabilities Served under IDEA During the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic (July 20, 2023)
Part B
 (ages 3 through 21)
Part C
 (birth through 2)

Students Identified With Traumatic Brain Injury
 (March 30, 2023)
Educational Environments of School Aged Children with Disabilities
 (May 23, 2022)
Students With Disabilities Who Are English Learners (ELs) Served Under IDEA Part B
 (April 8, 2022)
Race and Ethnicity of Children with Disabilities Served under IDEA Part B
 (August 9, 2021)
Hand in Hand
 supplemental tool

School Aged Children 5 (in Kindergarten) Through 21 Served Under Part B of the IDEA
 (May 2021) 
Hand in Hand
 supplemental tool

Personnel
 (April 2021)
2018-19/2019 IDEA Section 618 Data
 (April 2021)
Hispanic and/or Latino Children With Disabilities
 (December 2020)
Asian Children With Disabilities
 (December 2020)
IDEA 45th Anniversary
 (November 2020)
Children 3 through 5 Served Under IDEA Part B Section 619
 (October 2020)
Black or African American Children With Disabilities
 (August 2020)
American Indian or Alaska Native Children With Disabilities
 (August 2020)
Infants and Toddlers With Disabilities
 (June 2020)
Children Identified With Emotional Disturbance
 (May 2020)
Children Identified With Autism
 (March 2020)

### *Census Bureau Population Data and Other Government Data*

      - American Fact Finder
      - Data.gov

### *IDEA* Data Related Technical Assistance (TA) Centers and Office of Special Education Program (OSEP) Links

      - Center for Early Childhood Data Systems  ( DaSy ) 
      - *IDEA* Data Center  ( IDC )
      - Center for the Integration of *IDEA* Data  ( CIID ) 
      - Center for *IDEA* Fiscal Reporting  ( CIFR )
      - OSEP Community of Practice Page

### Other Department of Education Data Initiatives

      - Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Grant Program  ( SLDS )
      - Common Education Data Standard  ( CEDS ) 
      - Privacy Technical Assistance Center  ( PTAC ) 

### EdFacts Data Collection Information

      - EdFacts Initiative Homepage
      - EdFacts Community of Practice Page

----
# C_2018364EN.01000101.xml

| 8.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 364/01)

Last publication

OJ C 352, 1.10.2018

Past publications

OJ C 341, 24.9.2018

OJ C 328, 17.9.2018

OJ C 319, 10.9.2018

OJ C 311, 3.9.2018

OJ C 301, 27.8.2018

OJ C 294, 20.8.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 30.201-7 Cognizant Federal agency responsibilities.

See 48 CFR 9903.201-7.

[61 FR 18917, Apr. 29, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 40237, July 25, 1997; 85 FR 67614, Oct. 23, 2020]
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132302(51) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE BRISTOL ELLIS NISWONGER, BILLY RAY NISWONGER, and BETH ELIZABETH ANN NISWONGER, Minors.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, f/k/a FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 132302 COA: 266343 Ingham CC Family Division: 00-045297-NA JULIE NISWONGER, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 13, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 2, 2007

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HARRY LEO LICIAGA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 453 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Center of Educational Excellence for Black Teachers (CEEBT) Program

at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU)

CFDA: 84.116V

APPROVED SLATE

PR/Award No. Applicant Name Requested 

Amount ($)

Budget Reduction 

Amount ($)

Recommended 

Amount ($)

P116V210004 Winston-Salem State University $1,977,339.00 $164,090.00 $1,813,249.00

P116V210013 University of Maryland Eastern Shore $1,979,446.00 $164,265.00 $1,815,181.00

TOTALS $3,956,785.00 $328,355.00 $3,628,430.00
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Meyers, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on February 15, 1977, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw is granted. (See *Anders*v *California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Silverman, Evans and Fein, JJ.