alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Home |
|                                                   |

### Legislation

Program Authority:  Title VI, Part B of the ESEA, as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (20 U.S.C. 7515 7511-7546).

The authorizing legislation can be found at https://www2.ed.gov/documents/essa-act-of-1965.pdf (see pages 332 through 341 of the legislation).

### Regulations

EDGAR

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
333.103 Protests to the agency. ( f ) ( 1 ) Protests to the contracting officer must be in writing. The contracting officer is authorized to make the determination, using the criteria in Federal Acquisition Regulation 33.104(b), to award a contract notwithstanding the protest after obtaining the concurrence of the contracting activity's protest control officer and consulting with the appropriate legal office.
#### 2452.216-75 Unpriced task orders.

As prescribed in 2416.506-70(a), insert the following clause:

# Unpriced Task Orders (FEB 2006)

(a) Prior to the issuance of a task order under this contract, it is anticipated that the government and the contractor will reach agreement on the price or total cost and fee (if applicable) for the services to be provided under the order. The Contracting Officer may authorize commencement of work prior to final agreement on cost or price. In such case, the contractor shall immediately commence performance of the services specified in the order and shall submit a pricing proposal within 15 days of receipt of the task order. Upon completion of negotiations, the final negotiated cost or price will be set forth in a supplemental agreement that is executed by the contractor and the Contracting Officer. Failure to agree upon the cost or price shall be considered a dispute subject to the Disputes clause of this contract.

(b) Unpriced task orders shall indicate a “not-to-exceed” amount for the order; however, such amount shall not exceed 50 percent of the estimated cost of the task order. The task order shall only require the Contracting Officer's signature, but shall also comply with all other task order requirements. Unpriced task orders shall indicate the date by which the government anticipates that the cost or price of the order will be definitized.

(End of clause)

[71 FR 2439, Jan. 13, 2006]
32.304-7 Contract surety bonds and loan guarantees. ( a ) Contract surety bonds are incompatible with the Government's interests under guaranteed loans, unless the interests of the surety are subordinated to the guaranteed loan.
( b ) If a substantial share of the contractor's defense contracts are covered by surety bonds, or the amount of the bond is substantial in relation to the contractor's net worth, the agency shall not authorize the guarantee of a loan on a bonded contract unless the surety enters into an agreement with the financing institution to subordinate the surety's rights and claims in favor of the guaranteed loan.
( c ) The agency approval of a guarantee for a loan involving relatively substantial subcontracts covered by surety bonds shall also depend on the establishment of a reasonable allocation agreement between the sureties and the financing institution. The agreement should give the financing institution the benefit, with regard to payments to be made on the contract, of the portion of its loans fairly attributable to expenditures made under the bonded subcontracts before notice of default.
# C_2018103EN.01000801.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/8

---

Corrigendum to 2018 Call for proposals — Multi programmes — Grants to information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 9 of 12 January 2018
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 9 of 12 January 2018

(2018/C 103/09)

On page 33, Section 3, ‘Timetable’, first sentence:

for:

for:

‘12 April 2018’,

read:

read:

‘19 April 2018’.

On page 33, Section 3, ‘Timetable’, in the table:

for:

for:

‘(d)

read:

read:

‘(d)

On page 43, Section 8.2, ‘Operational capacity’, the third paragraph is deleted.

On page 44, Section 9, ‘Award criteria’, second last paragraph, numbered list (a), (b) and (c):

for:

for:

‘... criteria:

| (a) | the total of the remaining foreseen amount for the three topics on the internal market shall be allocated to the projects targeting the internal market with the highest quality score, irrespective of the topic for which they have applied; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the total of the remaining foreseen amount for the three topics on the internal market shall be allocated to the projects targeting the internal market with the highest quality score, irrespective of the topic for which they have applied;

| (b) | the same approach shall be taken for proposals targeting third countries (Topics 4–6); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the same approach shall be taken for proposals targeting third countries (Topics 4–6);

| (c) | if the foreseen amount is still not exhausted, the remaining amounts for both internal market and third countries shall be merged and assigned to projects with the highest quality score, irrespective of the priority and topic for which they have applied.’, |
| --- | --- |

(c)

if the foreseen amount is still not exhausted, the remaining amounts for both internal market and third countries shall be merged and assigned to projects with the highest quality score, irrespective of the priority and topic for which they have applied.’,

read:

read:

‘... criterion:

the total of the remaining foreseen amount for all four topics shall be merged and assigned to projects with the highest quality score, irrespective of the topic for which they have applied.’.

On page 46, Section 11.4, ‘Funding forms, eligible and ineligible costs’, under ‘Eligible costs’, first indent:

for:

for:

‘Eligible (direct and indirect) costs are indicated in the grant agreement (see Article 6 par.1, 2 and 3).’,

read:

read:

‘Eligible (direct and indirect) costs are indicated in the grant agreement (see Article 6 par. 1 and 2).’.

---
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 132 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the 

General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration relating to the ‘‘Federal Acquisition Regulation: Use of 

Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration relating to the ‘‘Federal Acquisition Regulation: Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Defense, the General Services Administration, 

5 and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 132 IH 

1 relating to the ‘‘Federal Acquisition Regulation: Use of 

2 Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction 

3 Projects’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 88708 (December 22, 2023)), 

4 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroTelesis, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A
for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


By /s/ Joseph Gutierrez
-----------------------
Joseph Gutierrez, President,  CFO

Dated: April 26, 2005
#### Walter Fey, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert A. Fey, Deceased, Respondent, v Edward J. Stengle et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to Special Term, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: By a notice of award against defendant Kings Moving and Storage, Inc. (Kings), the Workers’ Compensation Board closed a case arising out of an accident involving a truck owned by Kings in which plaintiff’s decedent was a passenger. The award directed King to pay $1,500 to the Uninsured Employers’ Fund under section 26-a of the Workers’ Compensation Law and $1,000 to the Vocational Rehabilitation Fund under subdivision 9 of section 15 of the Workers’ Compensation Law. On the notice of award was the notation: "Decision: Closed. Accident. Notice and causal relation established to death. Find no dependency.” Such a decision constituted a finding that the accident arose from decedent’s employment with Kings *(O’Rourke v Long,*41 NY2d 219, 227; *Matter of Coe v House Inside,*29 NY2d 241, 243-244; *Velasquez v Pine Grove Resort Ranch,*61 AD2d 1102, app dsmd 44 NY2d 949). Inasmuch as the award of the Workers’ Compensation Board was made after Special Term’s denial of a motion for summary judgment made by Kings and the driver of its truck, defendant Stengle, their motion to renew should have been granted. Once employment is established subdivision 6 of section 29 of the Workers’ Compensation Law provides that benefits under workers’ compensation are the exclusive remedy of an employee or his dependents. Section 11 of the Workers’ Compensation Law, however, allows an employee to elect to maintain an action if the employer failed properly to secure the payment of compensation. An award to pay into the Uninsured Employers’ Fund can be made in cases where there is no person entitled to compensation as well as where the employer failed to secure proper insurance (Workers’ Compensation Law, § 26-a). Since the board’s award in this case does not show upon which basis the award was made, plaintiff should be allowed to amend his complaint within 20 days of the order entered herein to allege, pursuant to section 11 of the Workers’ Compensation Law, failure to secure compensation for injured employees. In the event that the facts are not such that plaintiff may so amend his complaint, summary judgment should be granted to defendants Kings and Stengle. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — summary judgment.) Present — Moule, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
FY 2011 Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP) Awards

PR NUMBER MSEIP GRANTEE NAME STATE FY 2011 Awards 

P120A110050 California State University, Bakersfield CA $ 244,537

P120A110091 Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science CA $ 250,000

P120A110052 University of the District of Columbia DC $ 249,999

P120A110020 Miami Dade College InterAmerican Campus FL $ 208,034

P120A110059 Paine College GA $ 240,129

P120A110105 Elizabeth City State University NC $ 282,957

P120A110098 University of Puerto Rico - Arecibo Campus PR $ 249,922

P120A110068 University of Puerto Rico at Humacao PR $ 183,161

P120A110109 Houston Community College TX $ 294,135

P120A110067 Texas A&M International University TX $ 249,587

P120A110083 The University of Texas at Brownsville TX $ 249,983

P120A110086 The University of Texas at El Paso TX $ 196,134

$ 2,898,578

[10/18/2011]
You may search for current grantees under the Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities program by accessing the link below: 

**Discretionary Grants Database**
Disclaimer of Endorsement
#### 2933.203 Applicability.

The authority of the Agency Head for action under FAR subpart 33.2 is delegated to the SPE.
#### 3009.470 Reserve Officer Training Corps and military recruiting on campus.
');
	document.write('

|Color photo of Ted Mitchell, Under SecretaryPrint photo
|-------------------------------------------------------

Ted Mitchell is the under  secretary of education. He has served in this post since his confirmation by  the U.S. Senate on May 8, 2014, following his nomination by President Barack Obama on Oct. 31, 2013.  Mitchell reports to Secretary of Education John King and oversees policies, programs, and activities related to postsecondary education, adult, career and technical education, federal student aid, five White House Initiatives — Asian Americans  and Pacific Islanders, Educational Excellence for Hispanics, Educational Excellence for African Americans, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and American Indian and Alaska Native Education— and the Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

To spur education, economic growth, and social prosperity, Mitchell is charged with planning and policy responsibilities to implement President Obama's goal for the U.S. to have "the best educated, most competitive workforce in the world” as measured by the proportion of college graduates by the year 2020. Mitchell and his team  are keenly focused on implementing President Obama’s American Graduation Initiative to improve college access, affordability, quality, and completion.

Mitchell is the former CEO of the NewSchools Venture Fund and served as the president of the California State Board of Education. Through his long career in higher education,  Mitchell has served as the president of Occidental College, vice chancellor and  dean of the School of Education and Information Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, and professor and chair of the Department of Education at Dartmouth College.

Mitchell received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees, and Ph.D. from Stanford University. He lives in Washington, D.C. with his wife, Christine, and their two children.
#### 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials.

As prescribed in 203.171-4(b), insert the following provision:

# Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DOD Officials (Sep 2022)

(a) *Definition. Covered DoD official* is defined in the clause at 252.203-7000, Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials.

(b) By submission of this offer, the Offeror represents, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that all covered DoD officials employed by or otherwise receiving compensation from the Offeror, and who are expected to undertake activities on behalf of the Offeror for any resulting contract, are presently in compliance with all applicable post-employment restrictions, including those contained in 18 U.S.C. 207, 41 U.S.C. 2101-2107, 5 CFR part 2641, section 1045 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91), and Federal Acquisition Regulation 3.104-2.

(End of provision)

[76 FR 71830, Nov. 18, 2011, as amended at 87 FR 59029, Sept. 29, 2022]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JEROME AUGUTIS A/K/A JEROME AUGUSTIS )

Plaintiff, )

) No. 12 C 2451

vs. )

) Judge George M. Marovich

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

Defendant )

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiff Jerome Augutis hereby appeals to the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Seventh Circuit from the final judgment entered on or about 

September 11, 2012, denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment 

dismissing plaintiff’s case with prejudice.

Respectfully submitted,

 /S/ Carl P. Clavelli 

Carl P. Clavelli

One of the Attorneys

 for Jerome Augutis

100 W. Monroe Street

 Suite 1310

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 953-8165

Case: 1:12-cv-02451 Document #: 24 Filed: 11/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:106
#### 23.405 Waste reduction program.

To support pollution prevention and agency efforts to minimize waste in accordance with E.O. 14057, contracts for contractor operation of Government-owned or -leased facilities or for support services at Government-owned or -operated facilities shall require the contractor to promote cost-effective waste reduction in all operations and facilities covered by the contract.
2803.204 Treatment of violations. ( a ) The HCA or designee shall determine whether adverse action against the contractor in accordance with FAR 3.204(c) may be taken. In reaching a decision, the HCA or designee shall consult with the contracting activity's legal advisor and the OIG or other office designated in Attorney General Order 1931-94.
( b ) The SPE shall be advised of all instances where violations have been determined to have occurred and any action taken as a result.
( c ) Prior to taking any action against the contractor, the HCA or designee shall allow the contractor the opportunity to present opposing arguments in accordance with FAR 3.204(b).
# CA2018117EN.01000101.xml

| 3.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 117/1

---

ADDENDUM TO RESERVE LIST

Open competition EUIPO/AST/02/17 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of intellectual property

(2018/C 117 A/01)

| DE LA CUEVA CARABINE | Samantha |
| --- | --- |

DE LA CUEVA CARABINE

Samantha

This addendum will be valid until 30 June 2021.

30 June 2021

---
Appropriations

| **Fiscal Year** | **Amount** |
|-----------------|------------|
| $15,000,000     |
| $15,000,000     |
| $15,000,000     |
| $15,000,000     |
| $25,000,000     |
| $25,000,000     |
|            |

**Note:** These funds are set aside from funds appropriated for  Special Education—Grants to States (see # 84.027, under topical heading  "Special Education").
#### 252.222-7000 Restrictions on employment of personnel.

As prescribed in 222.7004, use the following clause:

# Restrictions on Employment of Personnel (MAR 2000)

(a) The Contractor shall employ, for the purpose of performing that portion of the contract work in ________, individuals who are residents thereof and who, in the case of any craft or trade, possess or would be able to acquire promptly the necessary skills to perform the contract.

(b) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (b), in each subcontract awarded under this contract.

(End of clause)

[65 FR 14403, Mar. 16, 2000]
**EXHIBIT      10.28**

----

----

**INVESTOR      RIGHTS AGREEMENT**

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

**COMPANY:**

**ACCESS      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

|  By: |  /s/ Stephen                B. Thompson |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------|

----

**PURCHASERS:**

|  By: |  /s/ Steven                H. Rouhandeh |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------|

----

**PURCHASERS:**

|  By: |  /s/ Jeffrey                  B. Davis |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHATTEM,
INC.'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                       850
<INVENTORY>                                     22,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,456
<PP&E>                                          39,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 490,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,046
<BONDS>                                        378,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,034
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   490,901
<SALES>                                        146,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,169
<CGS>                                           38,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,498
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,584)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,914
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88


</TABLE>