alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harry Kohn, Appellant, v. Phyllis Kohn, Respondent.

In an action by a husband for a divorce, in which the wife interposed a counterclaim for a judicial separation, and in which a judgment of separation in the wife’s favor was rendered awarding her sole custody of the parties’ infant daughter, $75 a week permanent alimony and a $750 counsel fee, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 24, 1964, which: (a) granted the wife’s motion to punish him for contempt in failing to pay such counsel fee; (b) permitted him to purge himself of the contempt by making 10 weekly payments of $75; (c) directed his commitment in the event of his default in such payments; and (d) denied his cross motion to be relieved of the payment of the alimony and counsel fee by reason of his financial inability, and to increase his visitation rights. Order reversed, without costs, and motion and cross motion remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. With respect to the motion to adjudge the husband in contempt, the order is defective in that it fails to declare that his disobedience to the judgment directing the payment of the counsel fee was calculated to, or actually did defeat, impair, impede or prejudice the rights of the wife; such declaration or recital is indispensable to a contempt adjudication (Judiciary Law, § 770; *Ross*v. *Ross,*2 A D 2d 758; *Novie*v. *Novie,*231 App. Div. 860; *Matter of Marinsky*v. *Ranald,*259 App. Div. 849). Upon the remission to the Special Term, if the Justice finds as a fact on the basis of all the proof adduced, that the husband’s disobedience was of the character described, he should make a finding accordingly and recite it in the order to be entered. It also appears that there is a serious dispute as to whether a copy of the judgment was ever served upon the husband. The husband insists that it was not served upon him; the wife asserts that it was; the affidavits are conflicting. Proper personal service of a copy of the judgment upon the husband would appear to be a prerequisite to holding him in contempt for the violation of its provisions (Domestic Relations Law, § 245; former Civ. Prac. Act, § 1172). In view of the sharp dispute as to the service, a hearing should be held upon the issue of whether proper service of a copy of the judgment was made upon the husband personally, and appropriate finding made on the basis of the proof adduced upon the hearing. Such finding should likewise be recited in the order to be entered. Since a hearing is required to be held and since a sharp dispute also exists with respect to the husband’s financial ability to pay the alimony and counsel fee as directed by the judgment, the hearing should embrace all the issues raised on the husband’s cross motion; and that motion should be determined *de novo*on the basis of all the proof. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Richard Klein, Petitioner, v Robert Haft et al., Respondents.

Application in this article 78 proceeding by petitioner, attorney of record for George Tyson, for a judgment directing dismissal of the indictment and prohibiting respondents from conducting further proceedings as against Tyson, unanimously denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. This is an article 78 proceeding brought by and on the petition of Tyson’s attorney to prohibit respondents Justice Haft and the District Attorney of New York County from conducting further proceedings against defendant and directing outright dismissal of the indictment for the failure to give defendant notice of the Grand Jury proceeding in accordance with CPL 190.50 (subd 5). Justice Haft had directed dismissal of the indictment, conditioned upon defendant signing a waiver of immunity and agreeing to testify before a Grand Jury within 10 days after the dismissal of the indictment. The present application is supported solely by the petition of counsel. There is neither petition nor affidavit of the aggrieved party, as required by CPLR 7804 (subd [d]). The statute is clear in its direction that there "shall” be a verified petition, which may be. accompanied by affidavits and other written proof. Although an affidavit of petitioner, if otherwise legally sufficient, may be construed as the petition (see *Matter of Doharty v Sanvidge,*58 Misc 2d 347, 348), there is here no petition by the aggrieved party. The petition here, by counsel in lieu of his client, does not suffice. The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, so held in *Matter of Giambra v Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of State of N. Y.*(59 AD2d 648, 649): "The petition * * * gave no adequate reason showing unusual necessity for verification by the attorney rather than the petition*873ers who were the aggrieved parties. CPLR 7804 (subd [d]) provides, in pertinent part, that the proceeding 'shall be by a verified petition, which may be accompanied by affidavits or other written proof.’ The document verified by the attorney was not a verified petition which complied with the statute *(Matter of Zelter v Nash,*285 App Div 1214; *Matter of Weintraub v Gabel,*41 Misc 2d 234).” The failure to adhere to the statutory procedure constitutes a jurisdictional defect and requires that the application be denied and the petition dismissed. In view of this disposition we have not considered whether the court was without power to require as a condition of dismissal of the indictment that the accused sign a waiver of immunity. CPL 190.50 (subd 5, par [b]) requires the signing and submission of a waiver of immunity as a condition of testimony before the Grand Jury by the accused. *(People v La Boy,*87 Misc 2d 449; *People v Searles,*79 Misc 2d 850; *People*v *Carter,*73 Misc 2d 1040.) Concur—Birns, J. P., Fein, Sandler and Silverman, JJ.
#### 245.402-71 Delivery of contractor-acquired property.

Follow the procedures at PGI 245.402-71 for the delivery of contractor-acquired property.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>

<S>                                                                                         <C>
      MPSI Systems Limited........................................................................U.K. Corporation
      MPSI Australia Pty. Ltd................................................................Australia Corporation
      MPSI do Brasil............................................................................Brazil Corporation
      MPSI Systems K.K........................................................................Japanese Corporation
      MPSI Systems Pte. Ltd..................................................................Singapore Corporation
      Shanghai MPSI Software Inc...............................................................Chinese Corporation
      Management Planning Systems, Inc........................................................Oklahoma Corporation

      INACTIVE CORPORATIONS
      MPSI China Inc..........................................................................Delaware Corporation
      MPSI Surveys Inc........................................................................Oklahoma Corporation
      MPSI Systems Canada Inc.................................................................Canadian Corporation
      MPSI Systems GmbH.........................................................................German Corporation
      MPSI Systems SARL.........................................................................French Corporation
      Quest Systems International Inc.........................................................Delaware Corporation

      BRANCH OFFICES
         Seoul, South Korea.......................................................Branch of MPSI Systems Pte. Ltd.
         Johannesburg, South Africa.....................................Branch of Management Planning Systems Inc.
                                                                                (d/b/a MPSI Africa Inc.)
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 178 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 178

  To authorize testimony, document production, and representation in 
                   United States v. Kevin Lee Olson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2017

  Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize testimony, document production, and representation in 
                   United States v. Kevin Lee Olson.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Kevin Lee Olson, Cr. No. 17-26, pending 
        in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, 
        the prosecution has requested the production of testimony and documents 
        from Kobye Noel, an employee in the Washington, D.C. office of Senator 
        Heidi Heitkamp;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current or former employees of the 
        Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 
        relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Kobye Noel, an employee in the Office of Senator 
Heidi Heitkamp, and any other current or former employee of the 
Senator's office from whom relevant evidence may be necessary, are 
authorized to testify and produce documents in the case of United 
States v. Kevin Lee Olson, except concerning matters for which a 
privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
current and former employees of Senator Heitkamp's office in connection 
with the production of evidence authorized in section one of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Scott Kody

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04112

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

Village of Schaumburg

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, October 9, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Defendant's

uncontested motion to reset the status date and requestthe Court not enter the dismissal

until 10/24/2014 [117] is granted. Status hearing set for 10/10/2014 is stricken and reset to

10/24/2014 at 09:00 AM. Parties shall appear on 10/24/2014 unless a stipulation of

dismissal is filed.Mailed notice(rth, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04112 Document #: 120 Filed: 10/09/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:722
# C_2017143EN.01000101.xml

| 6.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8432 — Bain Capital/MKM Building Supplies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 143/01)

On 28 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8432. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8432. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 27.203-2 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.227-10, Filing of Patent Applications—Classified Subject Matter, in all classified solicitations and contracts and in all solicitations and contracts where the nature of the work reasonably might result in a patent application containing classified subject matter.
# C_2017439EN.01000801.xml

| 20.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 December 2017

(2017/C 439/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1823 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88500 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9508 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1643 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8875 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,662 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,10 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1993 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6198 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5294 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5406 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5207 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2446 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6866 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5920 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 281,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0558 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8068 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5450 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 057,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8250 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,409 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,3065 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,655 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8862 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,5125 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,7025 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1823

JPY

Japanese yen

133,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88500

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9508

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1643

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8875

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,662

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,10

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1993

RON

Romanian leu

4,6198

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5294

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5406

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5207

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2446

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6866

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5920

KRW

South Korean won

1 281,28

ZAR

South African rand

15,0558

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8068

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5450

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 057,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8250

PHP

Philippine peso

59,409

RUB

Russian rouble

69,3065

THB

Thai baht

38,655

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8862

MXN

Mexican peso

22,5125

INR

Indian rupee

75,7025

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2018111EN.01003601.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/36

---

Corrigendum to public holidays 2018

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 8 of 11 January 2018
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 8 of 11 January 2018

(2018/C 111/11)

On page 14, in the table, the entry for ‘Nederland’:

for:

for:

‘1.1, 1.4, 2.4, 27.4, 10.5, 20.5, 21.5, 25.12, 26.12’,

read:

read:

‘1.1, 1.4, 2.4, 27.4, 10.5, 11.5, 20.5, 21.5, 24.12, 25.12, 26.12, 31.12’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>    0000018540
<NAME>  CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORTION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               Mar-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                        8,346
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                        264
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           1,268
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                           502
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                                   3,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  13,388
<COMMON>                                                           743
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                        1,040
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                              1,753
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                                   3,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               26
<PREFERRED>                                                        176
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                             4,174
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                           40
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                   1,467
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                       26
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                            1
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                          4
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                     2
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                                   3,936
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                                   13,388
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                        1,257
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                                21
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                       1,073
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                       1,094
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                            163
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                                  15
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                                     178
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           116
<NET-INCOME>                                                        62
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                          2
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                                       60
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                            92
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                           52
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                             147
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0.28
        




</TABLE>
# C_2018402EN.01000401.xml

| 8.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 November 2018

(2018/C 402/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1487 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4598 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87403 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3313 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1444 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 138,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5328 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,880 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 321,76 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2940 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6621 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,1357 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5750 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5019 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9935 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6954 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5729 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 286,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0216 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9426 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4338 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 748,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7734 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,584 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,7709 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,660 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3061 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,6326 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,2800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1487

JPY

Japanese yen

130,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4598

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87403

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3313

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1444

ISK

Iceland króna

138,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5328

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,880

HUF

Hungarian forint

321,76

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2940

RON

Romanian leu

4,6621

TRY

Turkish lira

6,1357

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5750

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5019

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9935

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6954

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5729

KRW

South Korean won

1 286,25

ZAR

South African rand

16,0216

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9426

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4338

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 748,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7734

PHP

Philippine peso

60,584

RUB

Russian rouble

75,7709

THB

Thai baht

37,660

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3061

MXN

Mexican peso

22,6326

INR

Indian rupee

83,2800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---