alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Annual Performance Report

Grantees are required to complete an online Annual Performance Report (APR) which is due no earlier than 90 days following the end of the fiscal year (September 30).  Grants in their first year must also submit an Interim Report, which is usually due about six months after the start of the grant on October 1.

## Final Performance Report

The online system will generate a final report from grantees’ individual annual reports for each grant ending September 30 of the collection period.  The online system generates the final performance so that reported data is consistent throughout the life cycle of grants and eliminates each grantee’s burden of having to compile a final report. 

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### 39.106 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.239-1, Privacy or Security Safeguards, in solicitations and contracts for information technology which require security of information technology, and/or are for the design, development, or operation of a system of records using commercial information technology services or support services.

[61 FR 41470, Aug. 8, 1996. Redesignated at 62 FR 274, Jan. 2, 1997. Redesignated at 79 FR 70344, Nov. 25, 2014]
# C_2018119EN.01000301.xml

| 5.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 119/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national side features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Finland

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Finnish national landscape Koli

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows a drawing from the top of the Finnish national landscape Koli. The year of issuance ‘2018’ is placed at the center bottom. The indication of the issuing country ‘FI’ is at the center left and the mint mark at the center right.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : April/May 2018

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
NO. 07-03-0263 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L B OCTOBER 22, 2003

______________________________ HERBERT FEIST, APPE LLANT

V. DIRECTORS OF THE TEXAS DEPT. OF CRIMINAL JUSTI CE, I NSTITU TIONA L DIV ISION , ANDTHE FI FTH CIRCUIT CO URT OF APPEALS, APPELL EES

_________________________________ FROM THE 108 TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUN TY; NO. 90,388-E; H ONORAB LE ABELOPEZ, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEM ORAN DUM OP INI ON
Herbert Feist, appellant, an inmate proceeding pro se , appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his case for failure to com ply with Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Rem edie s C ode . We dis m iss theapp eal.2

The trial court

clerk’s record wasfiled with this court on August 15, 2003; by letter dated August 18, this court’s clerk gave notice to appellant of the f iling of the tr ial court clerk’s record . P urs uan t toTex . R . A pp. Pr oc. 38. 6(a ), a ppe lla nt ’s brief was due Septem ber 15, 2003. By letter dated Septem ber 29, 2003, we notified appellant that the du e date fo r t he brief had passed, that the brief had not been filed and no m otion for extension of time to file had been recei ved by the court. Ci ting Tex. R. App. Proc. 38.8, the letter a lso n otif

ied ap pell ant that the appea l would be subject to dismissal unless a response reasona bly ex plaining his failure to file a brief, together with a showing that t he appellee ha s not been significantly injured by the failure, was subm itted by October 13, 2003. Both this cou rt ’s Augu st 18 and Septem ber 29 letters have been returned to t he court, with the notation “Ref used.” By telephone conf erence with the Tex

as Departm ent of C rim inal J ust ice f

acili ty i n which appellant is confined, this court’s clerk hasconfirmed thatappellant twice refused to accept delivery of either letter. W e find that thi s court’s notice to appellant in our August 18 and Septem ber 29 letters waseffective even though refused. See Barnes v. Frost Nat’l B ank , 840 S.W. 2d 747 (Tex.App.–San Antonio 1992, no writ). Appellan t has not fil ed a response to the court’s Septem ber 29 letter, nor has he since subm itted a brief or a mot ion for extension of tim e. Accordingl y, having given all parties more than the req uired te n d ay s’ n ot ic e, we dism iss the a ppeal for w ant of p rosecut ion. Tex . R. A pp. Pr oc. 38. 8(a)(1); 4 2.3(b).

Jam es T . C am pbe ll3 Justice
3037.104-70 Personal service contracts. ( b ) Authorization to acquire the personal services of experts and consultants is included in section 832 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 392. This section includes authority to use personal service contracts, including authority to contract without regard to the pay limitation of 5 U.S.C. 3109 when the services are necessary due to an urgent homeland security need.
[71 FR 25771, May 2, 2006]
#### 3052.203-70 Instructions for Contractor Disclosure of Violations.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3003.1004(a), insert the following clause:

# Instructions for Contractor Disclosure of Violations (SEP 2012)

When making a written disclosure under the clause at FAR 52.203-13, paragraph (b)(3), the Contractor may submit the disclosure to the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General using the methods described at *https://www.oig.dhs.gov/hotline* or *https://www.oig.dhs.gov/reports/publications/annual/contractor-disclosure,* and submit the disclosure electronically to the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. The Contractor shall provide a copy of the disclosure to the Contracting Officer by email or facsimile on the same business day as the submission to the Office of Inspector General. The Contractor shall provide the Contracting Officer a concurrent copy of any supporting materials submitted to the Office of Inspector General.

(End of clause)

[86 FR 17317, Apr. 2, 2021]
#### STUMPP & WALKER CO. v. LYNBER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Sales—Warranty of Quality.

Where, in a written offer for the sale of roses, defendant stated that they were “very fine stock,” such statement did not constitute an express warranty of quality.

¶ 1. See Sales, vol. 43, Cent. Dig. § 732.

Appeal from Municipal'Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Action by the Stumpp & Walker Company against John D. Lynber. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Henry G. K. Heath, for appellant.

Willeer & Hart, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

This action was brought to recover the price of 400 Crimson Rambler Roses sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant at $12 per hundred. The sale and its terms were established by letters between the parties. On April 16th the plaintiff offered to supply to the defendant the roses at the price mentioned, stating, *913“This is very fine stock,” and on the 19th of April the defendant directed the plaintiff to send them, and on the 22d they reached the defendant, and “he trimmed them a little, and put them in the ground, * * * all of them.” A week or two later he complained to the plaintiff’s representative that the roses were not in good condition when he received them, and refused to pay for more than 50 of them. The plaintiff brought this action, and recovered judgment in the sum of $48, the agreed price of the roses, and the defendant appeals.

There was not an expressed warranty of quality in the goods sold. While no particular words are necessary to constitute warranty, and any distinct assertion in that regard may be made a ground for finding there was one, we do not think in the case at bar that the words “very fine stock” constitute warranty. At most they amounted to nothifig more than a representation, which “is not necessarily, perhaps not usually, a warranty. Caveat emptor is the general rule.” Fanning v. The International Seed Co., 89 Hun, 146-148, 35 N. Y. Supp. 10. Moreover, it is not satisfactorily proved that the roses were not in good condition when they were delivered. The testimony of Mr. Joosten and Mr. Ringier tends to show that the plants were alive and healthy when they were delivered, and their testimony is not impeached. Upon all the evidence in the case we do not think the defendant proved a breach of warranty, even if there was one, and we find no valid ground to disturb the finding of the trial justice.

Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
# C_2016388EN.01000101.xml

| 21.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8174 — Talanx/Aberdeen/Escala Vila Franca/PNH Parque)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 388/01)

On 14 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8174. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8174. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

                - Related Site: CIBERWeb
                - International Resource Information System (IRIS) -- a performance reporting system and searchable database for 14 international education programs 
                - OPE - Other Applicant and Grantee Resources

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
Jacksonville Lime, LLC 1915 Wigmore Street  Jacksonville, Florida 32206

February 17, 2014

Heather Cerone Acting Chief Air Permits Section United States Environmental Protection Agency, Regi on IV Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960

Dear Ms. Cerone:
Please accept this letter as Jacksonville Lime, LLC , formal request for withdrawal of the Jacksonville Lime, LLC, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Air Permit Applicat ion. By virtue of this withdrawal request, Jacksonville Lime, LLC, asks that U.S. EPA disconti nue any further processing of the subject GHG permi t application. Additionally, Jacksonville Lime, LLC, requests that U.S. EPA transfer, on an immediate ba sis, all Jacksonville Lime, LLC, permit application file s to Florida DEP.
As you may recall, over the last few months, you an d representatives of Jacksonville Lime, LLC, have discussed the pending delegation of the GHG permitt ing program from U.S. EPA to Florida DEP, and the possibility of transferring GHG permit processing f or the Jacksonville Lime, LLC, permit application f rom U.S. EPA to Florida DEP. In view of the upcoming de legation of the GHG permitting program to Florida DEP, it appears sensible to have Florida DEP issue the GHG permit, since Florida DEP will ultimately b e responsible for administering the GHG permit, once issued.
Jacksonville Lime, LLC, appreciates your and U.S. E PA's efforts in bringing the subject permit applica tion to this juncture, and we look forward to the opport unity of working with you and U.S. EPA again, in th e future.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any ques tions or comments upon your review of this information. I can be reached at 205-612-6770.
Best Regards,

Nick Caggiano
Responsible Official
Jacksonville Lime, LLC.
#### 3006.304-70 DHS Approval of justification.

A justification for other than full and open competition that cites (FAR) 48 CFR section 6.302-2 as its authority shall be approved in writing by the HCA (unless a higher approval authority is required in accordance with (FAR) 48 CFR section 6.304 or DHS procedures) for a proposed DHS contract to facilitate the response to or recovery from a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster with a period of performance in excess of 150 days. The justification should make plain the exceptional circumstances that justify the duration of the contract. This authority may not be redelegated by the HCA.

[77 FR 50634, Aug. 22, 2012]
#### 3422.1002-1 General.

Consistent with 29 CFR 4.145, the five-year limitation set forth in the Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended (Service Contact Act), applies to each period of the contract individually, not the cumulative period of base and option periods. Accordingly, no contract subject to the Service Contract Act issued by the Department of Education will have a base period or option period that exceeds five years.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>   0000081027
<NAME>  PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
<SUBSIDIARY>
<NUMBER> 004
<NAME>  PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>              1,311,251
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               19,905
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                   102,850
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                   1,779
<OTHER-ASSETS>                            50,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,485,910
<COMMON>                                 157,230
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                180,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                      132,493
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>           469,723
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                5,287
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                     419,144
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                        46,793
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                 40,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>           504,963
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>          1,485,910
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                151,030
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       1,143
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>               137,359
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>               138,502
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   12,528
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          (521)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            12,007
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   9,087
<NET-INCOME>                               2,920
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   53
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>              2,867
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  15,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                  6,002
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       259
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.00
        

</TABLE>
326.600-2 Buy Indian Act acquisition regulations. ( a ) This subpart supplements Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation (HHSAR) requirements to meet the needs of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Indian Health Service (IHS) in implementing the Buy Indian Act.
( b ) This subpart is under the direct oversight and control of the Head of Contracting Activity (HCA), within the Office of Management Services (OMS)—IHS, HHS. The HCA, in consultation with the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources (ASFR) and the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), is responsible for promulgating this subpart, and following its enactment, will be primarily responsible for implementing its terms.
( c ) Acquisitions conducted under this subpart are subject to all applicable requirements of the FAR and HHSAR, as well as internal policies, procedures, or instructions issued by IHS. After the FAR, this HHSAR subpart would take precedence over any inconsistent IHS policies, procedures, or instructions.
# C_2017201EN.01000201.xml

| 24.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 June 2017

(2017/C 201/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1173 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4372 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87805 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7700 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0851 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4613 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,297 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2320 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5715 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9235 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4764 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4783 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7147 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5345 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5496 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 271,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4531 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6413 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4030 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 865,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7910 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,117 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 66,6677 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,927 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7293 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1620 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,1025 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1173

JPY

Japanese yen

124,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4372

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87805

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7700

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0851

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4613

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,297

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2320

RON

Romanian leu

4,5715

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9235

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4764

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4783

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7147

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5345

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5496

KRW

South Korean won

1 271,16

ZAR

South African rand

14,4531

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6413

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4030

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 865,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7910

PHP

Philippine peso

56,117

RUB

Russian rouble

66,6677

THB

Thai baht

37,927

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7293

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1620

INR

Indian rupee

72,1025

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---