alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 343 

To authorize testimony, document production, and representation in Arizona 

v. Mark Louis Prichard. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 28, 2017 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony, document production, and 

representation in Arizona v. Mark Louis Prichard. 

Whereas, in the case of Arizona v. Mark Louis Prichard, Cr. 

No. 17–711443, pending in the Justice Court of Pima 

County, Arizona, the prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Julie Katsel, an employee in 

the Tucson, Arizona office of Senator Jeff Flake; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current or former employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:14 Nov 29, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR343.ATS SR343

SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 343 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Julie Katsel, an employee in the Office 

2 of Senator Jeff Flake, and any other current or former 

3 employee of the Senator’s office from whom relevant evi4 dence may be necessary, are authorized to testify and 

5 produce documents in the case of Arizona v. Mark Louis 

6 Prichard, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

7 should be asserted. 

8 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

9 represent current and former Members, officers, and em10 ployees of the Senate in connection with the production 

11 of evidence authorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Acrylonitrile

Source Categories

Emissions 

(tons/yr) %

Cumulative 

%

Emissions 

(tons/yr) %

Cumulative 

%

Acrylic Fibers/Modacrylic Fibers Production 3.74E+01 9.96 9.96 3.74E+01 9.96 9.96

Cement, Hydraulic (not subject to Portland Cement MACT) 3.50E-03 0.00 9.96 3.50E-03 0.00 9.96

Chemical Preparations 3.30E-02 0.01 9.97 3.30E-02 0.01 9.97

Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production [1] 1.53E+00 0.41 10.38 1.53E+00 0.41 10.37

Fabricated Rubber Products, nec 2.50E-01 0.07 10.44 2.50E-01 0.07 10.44

Industrial Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing 2.50E-03 0.00 10.44 2.50E-03 0.00 10.44

Industrial Organic Chemical Manufacturing 2.93E+00 0.78 11.22 2.93E+00 0.78 11.22

Municipal Landfills 2.93E+02 77.90 89.12 2.93E+02 77.90 89.12

Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (MON) 4.04E+00 1.08 90.19 4.04E+00 1.08 90.20

Paints and Allied Products Manufacturing 3.78E-01 0.10 90.29 3.78E-01 0.10 90.30

Plastic Materials and Resins Manufacturing [2] 6.12E+00 1.63 91.92 6.12E+00 1.63 91.93

Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) 2.05E+01 5.46 97.39 2.05E+01 5.46 97.39

Reinforced Plastics Composites Production 2.96E-02 0.01 97.39 2.69E-02 0.01 97.39

Secondary Lead Smelting 3.85E-02 0.01 97.40 3.85E-02 0.01 97.40

Sewage Sludge Incinerators 9.50E+00 2.53 99.93 9.50E+00 2.53 99.93

Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating) 2.32E-03 0.00 99.93 2.31E-03 0.00 99.93

Surface Active Agents Manufacturing 1.25E-01 0.03 99.97 1.25E-01 0.03 99.97

Tire Production 1.28E-01 0.03 100.00 1.28E-01 0.03 100.00

Total Emissions 375.95 100.00 375.61 100.00

Foot Notes 

[1] Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production was titled Cyclic 

Crude and Intermediate Production (not subject to petroleum 

refining MACT) in the May 1999 Report

[2] Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing (Nov. 2002 

Inventory) was titled Polymers and Resins (I,II,IV) in the May 

1999 Report

November 2002 Inventory May 1999 Report Inventory

Acrylonitrile
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134498 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134498 

 COA: 273971 

Chippewa CC: 98-006681-FH

DARRIN SCOTT LAPINE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2007 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
#### 252.233-7001 Choice of law (overseas).

As prescribed in 233.215-70, use the following clause:

# Choice of Law (Overseas) (JUN 1997)

This contract shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the substantive laws of the United States of America. By the execution of this contract, the Contractor expressly agrees to waive any rights to invoke the jurisdiction of local national courts where this contract is performed and agrees to accept the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals and the United States Court of Federal Claims for hearing and determination of any and all disputes that may arise under the Disputes clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

[62 FR 34135, June 24, 1997]
#### 252.237-7018 Special definitions of Government property.

As prescribed in 237.7101(g), use the following clause:

# Special Definitions of Government Property (DEC 1991)

Articles delivered to the Contractor to be laundered or dry-cleaned, including any articles which are actually owned by individual Government personnel, are Government-owned property, not Government-furnished property. Government-owned property does not fall under the requirements of any Government-furnished property clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 3416, Jan. 23, 2006]
# C_2018159EN.01001701.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 May 2018

(2018/C 159/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1969 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4492 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88235 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5715 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1950 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6440 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,503 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,87 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2543 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6620 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,0963 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5915 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5410 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3952 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7067 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5962 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 288,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1135 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6113 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4040 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 729,91 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7134 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,847 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,4816 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,008 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2446 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,9276 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,0270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1969

JPY

Japanese yen

130,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4492

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88235

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5715

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1950

ISK

Iceland króna

122,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6440

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,503

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,87

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2543

RON

Romanian leu

4,6620

TRY

Turkish lira

5,0963

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5915

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5410

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3952

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7067

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5962

KRW

South Korean won

1 288,32

ZAR

South African rand

15,1135

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6113

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4040

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 729,91

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7134

PHP

Philippine peso

61,847

RUB

Russian rouble

75,4816

THB

Thai baht

38,008

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2446

MXN

Mexican peso

22,9276

INR

Indian rupee

80,0270

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### ROCHESTER & EASTERN RAPID RY. CO., Respondent, v. WEILAND et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 24, 1903.)

Action by the Rochester & Eastern Rapid Railway Company against Joseph H. Weiland and another.

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion for re-taxation granted, with $10 costs. The clerk is directed, upon such retaxation, to allow all the rejected items in the bill presented, excepting the $10 costs of motion for the appointment of commissioners. See Matter of Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Co., 176 N. Y. 213, 68 N. E. 249.
#### Helene Lotto et al., Appellants, v Beth Sholom Center of Amityville and the Massapequas, Also Known as Amityville Hebrew Congregation, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 12, 1978, which denied their motion for leave to serve a supplemental bill of particulars. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted, on condition that plaintiff Helene Lotto submit to further physical and oral examinations before trial, if defendant be so advised, limited to the issues of her injuries and damages. Defendant’s time to serve a demand for said examinations is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. In the event that plaintiffs fail to comply with the demand, if the same be served, then order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The proposed supplemental bill of particulars, rather than involving additional injuries, would serve only to update the amount of medical expenses for a surgical procedure specifically mentioned in the original bill of particulars. In these circumstances, defendant will suffer no prejudice from the relief hereby granted under the above-imposed condition (see *Cippitelli v Hower,*54 AD2d 954; *Portilla v Boyke,*51 AD2d 539). O’Connor, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Mangano, JJ., concur.
AMENDMENT  TO NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

ThisAMENDMENT TO NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT(this "Amendment"), dated as of January 1, 2001, is made by
and between Flow International Corporation (the "Company"), and each ofCONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYandLIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA(the "Holders").

BACKGROUND

A.  Pursuant
to the Note Purchase Agreement (the "Note Agreement"), dated as of September 1, 1995, between the Company and the Holders the Company issued and the
Holders purchased Fifteen Million Dollars ($15,000,000) in aggregate principal amount of the Company's 7.20% Notes due 2005 (the "Notes").

B.  The
Company has requested that the Holders amend one of the Company's obligations under the Note Agreement.

C.  The
Company and the Holders desire to enter into this Amendment to effectuate the above-mentioned amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE,in order to induce the Holders to amend the Note Agreement as set forth below and in consideration of other good and
valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged) the Company and the Holders agree as follows:











---





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have each caused this Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by
their respective, duly authorized officers as of the date first above written.

COMPANY:

|Flow International Corporation |        | 
|------------------------------ | ------ | 
|                               |        | 
|By:                            |        | 
|                               |        | 
|                               | Name:  | 
|                               | Title: | 

|                                            |  |     |              |  | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | --- | ------------ |  | 
|HOLDERS:                                    |  |    
|CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY* |  |    
|By: CIGNA Investments, Inc.                 |  |    
|                                            |  |     |              |  | 
|                                            |  | By: |              |  | 
|                                            |  |     | Name:
Title: |  | 
|                                            |  |     |              |  | 
|LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA*    |  |    
|By: CIGNA Investments, Inc.                 |  |    
|                                            |  | By: |              |  | 
|                                            |  |     | Name:
Title: |  | 

---

Signature
page to Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement dated as of January 1, 2001 by and between Flow International Corporation and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Life
Insurance Company of North America.

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICEROR****PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report, on Form 10-K, of Sun Bancorp,Inc. (the “Company”), for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wilmer D. Leinbach,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       To my knowledge,the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods covered by the Report.

 
|        |                                   |
|-------------|----------------------------------------|
|        | /s/ Wilmer D. Leinbach                 |   |
|        | Exec. VP & Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                                   |
|  Date: | July 24, 2003                          |   |   |
|             |                                        |  |  |  |

 

----
# C_2017146EN.01000101.xml

| 11.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8270 — EDF/CDC/RTE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 146/01)

On 24 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8270. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8270. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 3052.209-74 Limitations on contractors acting as lead system integrators.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.570-4(a), use the following provision:

# Limitations on Contractors Acting as Lead System Integrators (JUL 2010)

(a) *Definitions.* “Direct financial interest,” “lead system integrator,” “lead system integrator with system responsibility,” and “lead system integrator without system responsibility,” as used in this provision, have the meanings given in the clause of this solicitation entitled “Prohibited Financial Interests for Lead System Integrators” ((HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.209-75).

(b) *General.* Unless an exception is granted, no contractor performing lead system integrator functions in the acquisition of a major system by the Department of Homeland Security may have any direct financial interest in the development or construction of any individual system or element of any system of systems.

(c) *Representations.* (1) The offeror represents that it does [ ] does not [ ] propose to perform this contract as a lead system integrator with system responsibility.

(2) The offeror represents that it does [ ] does not [ ] propose to perform this contract as a lead system integrator without system responsibility.

(3) If the offeror answered in the affirmative in paragraph (c)(1) or (2) of this provision, the offeror represents that it does [ ] does not [ ] have any direct financial interest in the development or construction of any system(s), subsystem(s), system of systems, element of any system of systems, or services it proposes or intends to seek to satisfy this solicitation.

(d) If the offeror answered in the affirmative in paragraph (c)(3) of this provision, the offeror should contact the Contracting Officer for guidance on whether an exception may apply and what responsibilities the offeror may have in qualifying for an exception.

(e) If the offeror does have a direct financial interest, the offeror shall be prohibited from receiving an award under this solicitation, unless:

(1) The offeror submits to the Contracting Officer appropriate evidence that the offeror was selected by a subcontractor to serve as a lower-tier subcontractor through a process over which the offeror exercised no control; or

(2) the conditions described in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.570-2(b)(1)(i) and (ii) exist, after an opportunity is afforded to the offeror to provide information or commitments as may be necessary to meet (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.570-2(b)(1)(ii), assuming any such information or commitment will allow DHS to meet that standard.

(f) This provision implements the requirements of 6 U.S.C. 396, as added by Section 6405 of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, And Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-28).

(End of provision)

[75 FR 41100, July 15, 2010]
#### 3001.105 Issuance.
# C_2018090EN.01000201.xml

| 9.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 March 2018

(2018/C 90/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2421 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,83 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4505 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89465 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2173 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1731 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7135 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,427 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,02 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2042 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6588 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,7326 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5912 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6044 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7356 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7102 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6339 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,7670 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8696 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4365 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 114,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8523 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,646 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,6686 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,921 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0261 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2184 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,8980 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2421

JPY

Japanese yen

131,83

DKK

Danish krone

7,4505

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89465

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2173

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1731

ISK

Iceland króna

123,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7135

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,427

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,02

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2042

RON

Romanian leu

4,6588

TRY

Turkish lira

4,7326

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5912

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6044

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7356

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7102

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6339

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,33

ZAR

South African rand

14,7670

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8696

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4365

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 114,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8523

PHP

Philippine peso

64,646

RUB

Russian rouble

70,6686

THB

Thai baht

38,921

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0261

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2184

INR

Indian rupee

80,8980

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---