alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**Who May Apply (by category):**  Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs)

**Who May Apply (specifically):** Combinations of institutions also may apply.

IFLE Home

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
1542.1202 Responsibility for executing agreements. ( a ) Any EPA contracting office upon being notified of a successor in interest to, or change of name of, one of its Contractors shall promptly report such information by memorandum to the Director, Policy, Training and Oversight Division (POTD).
( b ) To avoid duplication of effort on the part of EPA contracting offices in preparing and executing agreements to recognize a change of name or successor in interest, only one supplemental agreement will be prepared to effect necessary changes for all contracts between EPA and the Contractor involved. The Chief of the Procurement Policy Branch, Policy, Training and Oversight Division (PTOD), will, in each case, designate the Contracting Office responsible for taking all necessary and appropriate action with respect to either recognizing or not recognizing a successor in interest, or recognizing a change of name agreement.
[49 FR 8865, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 55 FR 24580, June 18, 1990; 59 FR 18977, Apr. 21, 1994]
#### George S. Scott et al., Respondents, *v.*Jane R. Stockwell, Administratrix, etc., et al., Appellants.

(Argued June 12, 1883 ;

decided June 26, 1883.)

*Ira D. Warren*for appellants.

*A. J. Vanderpoel*and *Adolphus D. Pape*for respondents.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
225.7302 Preparation of letter of offer and acceptance. For FMS programs that will require an acquisition, the contracting officer shall assist the DoD implementing agency responsible for preparing the Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA) by— ( 1 ) Working with prospective contractors to— ( i ) Identify, in advance of the LOA, any unusual provisions or deviations (such as those requirements for Pseudo LOAs identified at PGI 225.7301);
( ii ) Advise the contractor if the DoD implementing agency expands, modifies, or does not accept any key elements of the prospective contractor's proposal;
( iii ) Identify any logistics support necessary to perform the contract (such as those requirements identified at PGI 225.7301); and
( iv ) For noncompetitive acquisitions over $10,000, ask the prospective contractor for information on price, delivery, and other relevant factors. The request for information shall identify the fact that the information is for a potential foreign military sale and shall identify the foreign customer; and
( 2 ) Working with the DoD implementing agency responsible for preparing the LOA, as specified in PGI 225.7302.
[78 FR 73451, Dec. 6, 2013]
a division of PABCO Building Products, LLC 9780 South 52 00 Wes t West Jordan, Utah 84088-5625 February 23 , 2011 JeffTe landar US EPA Sector Policies and Programs Division Direct - (80 I) 280-5229
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standard s - (D243-02)- RTP , NC 277 11 

### RE: ICR for Interstate Brick Mr. Telandar: Fax (80 I) 282 -5 220

The information table belo w lists the Shutdowns and Startup s (SS) on th e Wet Scrubbers for our Line 3 and Line 4 Kiln s. Kiln s 1 and 2 are not currently operating. The SS for Line 3 and Line 4 are for routine maintenance and the existing permit for our faci lity does not li st app lic ab le limits for routine maintenance. These routine maintenance events shown below require that our scrubbers to be off line only 2% of the ti me Other than these routine maintenance SS we have had no other SS events durin g the past 3 year period. 

## ICR - Startup and Shutdown for Kiln Scrubbers - CY2008-201 0

Sincerely. Gera ld C. Gunning Operations Manager BRICK DIVISION LOCA TJONS: Kiln Permit

H. C. M U DDOX: 4875 Brad s haw Ro ad , Sacramento, CA 95827 -9727 (800) 77 6 -1 244 Fax (9 1 6) 362 - 9182 I NTERSTATE BRICK: 9 780 South 5200 We st, W es t Jordan, Utah 84088-5625 (800) 233-86 5 4 Fax (80 I) 280 - 5220 Event
28.103-3 Payment bonds. ( a ) A payment bond is required only when a performance bond is required, and if the use of payment bond is in the Government's interest.
( b ) When a contract price is increased, the Government may require additional bond protection in an amount adequate to protect suppliers of labor and material.
[48 FR 42286, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 39213, July 26, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than February 18, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. The Michael Stephens Leonard Second Amended and Restated 
Revocable Trust, Mike Leonard as trustee, the Amended and Restated 
Ginger Batson Trust, Ginger Batson as trustee, Carsen Lamont, Courtney 
Michelle Lamont, and a minor child, all of Muskogee, Oklahoma; and The 
Amy N. Bennett Revocable Trust Agreement, Amy Bennett, individually and 
as trustee, and minor children, all of Bixby, Oklahoma; to form the 
Leonard Family Group, a group acting in concert to acquire voting 
shares of Stigler Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of The First National Bank of Stigler, both of Stigler, 
Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 29, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-02237 Filed 2-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules, Revised notice of open 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules will hold a virtual 
meeting on April 8, 2021 and April 9, 2021. The meeting is open to the 
public. When a meeting is held virtually, members of the public may 
join by telephone or video conference to observe but not participate. 
An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in 
advance of the meeting at: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books. The announcement 
for this meeting was previously published in 86 FR 3195.

DATES: April 8-9, 2021, 10 a.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, 
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference 
of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One 
Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-
1820, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#095b7c656c7a4a666464607d7d6c6c565a6c6a7b6c7d687b70496866277c7a6a667c7b7d7a276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f4d6a737a6c5c707272766b6b7a7a404c7a7c6d7a6b7e6d665f7e70316a6c7c706a6d6b6c31787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.

    Dated: January 14, 2021.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-01383 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# TR-FY2015
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 25 

Designating January 27, 2017, as a national day of remembrance for people 

of the United States who, during the Cold War, worked and lived downwind from nuclear testing sites and were adversely affected by the radiation exposure generated by the above ground nuclear weapons testing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. UDALL, Mr. RISCH, Mr. HEINRICH, and Mr. 

BENNET) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating January 27, 2017, as a national day of remembrance for people of the United States who, during the 

Cold War, worked and lived downwind from nuclear testing sites and were adversely affected by the radiation 

exposure generated by the above ground nuclear weapons 

testing. 

Whereas, on January 27, 1951, the first of years of nuclear 

weapons tests was conducted at a site known as the Nevada Proving Ground, located approximately 65 miles 

northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada; 

Whereas the extensive testing at the Nevada Proving Ground 

occurred just years after the first nuclear weapon test, 

which was conducted on July 16, 1945, at what is known 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 25 IS 

as the Trinity Atomic Test Site, located approximately 35 

miles south of Socorro, New Mexico; 

Whereas many people of the United States who, during the 

Cold War, worked and lived downwind from nuclear testing sites (referred to in this preamble as the 

‘‘downwinders’’) were adversely affected by the radiation 

exposure generated by the above ground nuclear weapons 

testing, and some of the downwinders sickened as a result of the radiation exposure; 

Whereas the downwinders paid a high price for the development of a nuclear weapons program for the benefit of the 

United States; and 

Whereas the downwinders deserve to be recognized for the 

sacrifice they have made for the defense of the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates January 27, 2017, as a national 

3 day of remembrance for people of the United States 

4 who, during the Cold War, worked and lived down5 wind from nuclear testing sites and were adversely 

6 affected by the radiation exposure generated by the 

7 above ground nuclear weapons testing; and 

8 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to support and participate in appropriate cere10 monies, programs, and other activities to commemo11 rate that national day of remembrance. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2018324EN.01001101.xml

| 13.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 September 2018

(2018/C 324/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1585 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4594 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89028 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4740 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1277 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 132,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6328 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,590 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 325,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3099 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6380 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,3781 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6268 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5137 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,0934 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7772 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5945 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 307,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,4368 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9588 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4350 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 174,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8037 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,640 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 80,1609 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,981 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,7859 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1760 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,6705 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1585

JPY

Japanese yen

129,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4594

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89028

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4740

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1277

ISK

Iceland króna

132,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6328

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,590

HUF

Hungarian forint

325,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3099

RON

Romanian leu

4,6380

TRY

Turkish lira

7,3781

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6268

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5137

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,0934

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7772

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5945

KRW

South Korean won

1 307,37

ZAR

South African rand

17,4368

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9588

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4350

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 174,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8037

PHP

Philippine peso

62,640

RUB

Russian rouble

80,1609

THB

Thai baht

37,981

BRL

Brazilian real

4,7859

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1760

INR

Indian rupee

83,6705

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
There are no questions and answers here yet. Updated or outdated questions and answers will be published here for a historical record.
# Training-FY 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             448
<SECURITIES>                                       788
<RECEIVABLES>                                      512
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          36,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         20,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,290
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,920
<SALES>                                          8,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,114
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    233
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                233
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph Gutierrez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of  AeroTelesis,  Inc.
formerly known as Pacific Realm, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge,  this quarterly
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: February 19, 2004


/s/ Joseph Gutierrez
Joseph Gutierrez, Chief Financial Officer
#### Frank Filardi, Individually and as Preliminary Administrator of the Estate of Vincenza Filardi, Deceased, Appellant, v Bronxville Obstetrical and Gynecological Group, P. C., et al., Respondents.

— In a medical malpractice action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s decedent, plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 29, 1978, which dismissed the wrongful death cause of action, and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated July 6, 1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated June 29, 1978 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order *998was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated July 6, 1978 reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and, upon reargument, the wrongful death cause of action is reinstated. The last date on which commencement of the wrongful death action could have taken place was July 31, 1977. On July 29, 1977 plaintiff sought to commence the action by personally delivering the summons to the Sheriff of Westchester County pursuant to CPLR 203 (subd [b]). It is undisputed that upon delivery of the summons a Deputy Sheriff, after reviewing the papers, refused to accept service upon the erroneous assumption that the summons should have been delivered to the Bronx County Sheriff. The papers were returned to the plaintiff. No further action was taken until after July 31. It is also undisputed that defendants were served within 60 days thereafter. Under these circumstances we hold that the summons was "delivered * * * to the sheriff” within the meaning of CPLR 203 (subd [b], par 5). Had plaintiff merely dropped the summons in the mail and addressed it to the Westchester County Sheriff, there would have been compliance with CPLR 203 (subd [b], par 5) (see *Williams v Interboro Gen. Hosp.,*59 AD2d 738). A plaintiff who has taken the initiative to deliver the summons directly to the Sheriff should not receive harsher treatment merely because of a wrongful rejection of the summons by the Sheriff after its delivery to him. "Delivery to the Sheriff does not require the constitutional protection afforded by personal service of a summons as notice to the defendant of the interposition of a claim. This protection is still guaranteed since CPLR 203 (subd [b], par 5) states that an extension of time is only obtained 'if the summons is served upon the defendant within sixty days after the period of limitation would have expired’, thereby achieving the required notice. (See, also, *Tracy v New York Mag. Co.,*50 AD2d 775.)” *(Williams v Interboro Gen. Hosp,, supra,*p 739). Damiani, J. P., Titone, O’Connor and Martuscello, JJ., concur.