alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 20795 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. J E S U S R E Y N A -O R T A , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 08- C R

- 318- 1
B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder alPu b l i c D efen d er ap p oin ted to rep rese n t J esu s R eyna- O r t a has
m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S
. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. Rey na- O r t a ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<SUBSIDIARY> 
<NUMBER> 003
<NAME>  CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                3,401,579
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                  1,966
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     293,175
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                     5,215
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                           1,201,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           4,903,614
<COMMON>                                                   168,888
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                  405,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                        854,986
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                           1,428,874
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                308,065
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                     1,326,917
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                               0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                              200,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                      0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                           1,639,758
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                            4,903,614
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                  615,782
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                        20,771
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 499,577
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 520,348
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                     95,434
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                           2,275
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                              97,709
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    62,751
<NET-INCOME>                                                34,958
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                  5,610
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                               32,054
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    46,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                   54,118
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                     185,422
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.00
        




</TABLE>
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

For questions regarding the  Career Pathways program, please contact:

Sharon Easterling, 202-453-7425

Carmen Gordon, 202-453-7311

**Mailing  Address**

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 61

                     Supporting Israeli democracy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

 Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Ms. Kuster, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Raskin, Mr. 
Goldman of New York, Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania, Mr. Connolly, Ms. Eshoo, 
 Ms. Brownley, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Takano, and Ms. 
Wild) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                     Supporting Israeli democracy.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) democracy is at the core of the special relationship 
        between the United States and Israel;
            (2) Congress opposes actions that undermine Israel's future 
        as a Jewish, democratic State; and
            (3) Congress stands with all Israelis seeking to defend 
        liberal democracy, judicial review, and independent political 
        institutions acting in a system of checks and balances.
                                 <all>
```
2836.602-5 Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. ( a ) The short selection process, described in FAR 36.602-5, is authorized for use in DOJ contracts not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
( b ) The HCA or designee is the agency head for purposes of FAR 36.602-5(b)(2).
# C_2017056EN.01000101.xml

| 22.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8150 — Danone/The Whitewave Foods Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 56/01)

On 16 December 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8150. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8150. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### L & P Electric Co., Inc., Appellant, *v.*E. J. Korvette, Inc., Respondent.

First Department,

June 19, 1962.

*Milton Black*of counsel *(Mudge, Stern, Baldwin & Todd*with him on the brief; *Austin A. Laber,*attorney), for appellant.

*David Rayvid*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff-appellant (herein plaintiff) as one of seven exclusive wholesale distributors of Fedder products for a specified geographical area within New York State, seeks an injunction *pendente lite*to restrain defendant from selling certain of such products below the established fair-trade price.

*480Plaintiff alleges in its complaint that as such exclusive distributor it, and the other distributors, by written agreements dated September 1,1961, were expressly authorized to institute a fair-trade program with respect to certain Fedder products, and required to take all steps necessary to enforce such programs. There is no dispute that plaintiff has instituted such program and moved vigorously to enforce it, nor is it denied that defendant is selling below the fixed prices.

While it has been held that an exclusive State-wide distributor, when authorized by the owner to fix fair-trade prices, may maintain an action for an injunction against price cutting *(Continental Distilling Sales Co.*v. *Famous Wines & Liq.,*273 App. Div. 713; see, also, *Norman M. Morris Corp.*v. *Hess Bros.,*243 F. 2d 274), even against one who has not signed such a contract *(Bourjois Sales Corp.*v. *Dorfman,*273 N. Y. 167), there is a paucity of appellate expression in this State when the area of the distributor involved is less than State-wide.

Judicial notice may be taken of the fact that the area for which plaintiff holds the exclusive franchise is extensive and equal to that included within the boundaries of some States. Upon the facts of this case, the purposes of the act being considered *(Guerlain, Inc.,*v. *F. W. Woolworth Co.,*297 N. Y. 11, 17), no valid reason appears why the relief sought should not be granted. Nor is *Faber, Coe & Greg, Inc.,*v. *E. J. Korvette, Inc.*(N. Y. L. J., Sept. 28, 1956, p. 6, col. 5), relied on by defendant, to the contrary. The complaint in that case did not allege that plaintiff was an exclusive distributor, such an averment appeared only in its brief. The court pointed out the complaint was insufficient and the brief could not cure it.

Accordingly, the order appealed from should be reversed on the law and the motion for a temporary injunction granted, with costs to the appellant conditioned upon the plaintiff furnishing a substantial undertaking, the amount thereof to be determined upon submission of the order. Settle order on notice.

Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ., concur.

Order entered on May 16, 1962 unanimously reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion for a temporary injunction granted conditioned upon the plaintiff furnishing a substantial undertaking, the amount thereof to be determined upon submission of the order. Settle order on notice.
247.271-1 Policy. ( a ) *Annual contracts.* Normally— ( 1 ) Use requirements contracts to acquire services for the— ( i ) Preparation of personal property for shipment or storage; and
( ii ) Performance of intra-area movement.
( 2 ) Award contracts on a calendar year basis.
( 3 ) Provide for option years.
( 4 ) Award contracts, or exercise option years, before November 1 of each year, if possible.
( b ) *Areas of performance.* Define clearly in the solicitation each area of performance. ( 1 ) Establish one or more areas; however, hold the number to a minimum consistent with local conditions.
( 2 ) Each schedule may provide for the same or different areas of performance. Determine the areas as follows— ( i ) Use political boundaries, streets, or any other features as lines of demarcation. Consider such matters as— ( A ) Total volume;
( B ) Size of overall area; and
( C ) The need to service isolated areas of high population density.
( ii ) Specifically identify frequently used terminals, and consider them as being included in each area of performance described in the solicitation.
( c ) *Maximum requirements-minimum capability.* The contracting officer must— ( 1 ) Establish realistic quantities on the Estimated Quantities Report in DoD 4500.9-R, Defense Transportation Regulation, Part IV;
( 2 ) Ensure that the Government's minimum acceptable daily capability— ( i ) Will at least equal the maximum authorized individual weight allowance as prescribed by the Joint Federal Travel Regulations; and
( ii ) Will encourage maximum participation of small business concerns as offerors.
[56 FR 36466, July 31, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 50145, Aug. 17, 2000. Redesignated at 75 FR 51417, Aug. 20, 2010]
# C_2019044EN.01000101.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 44/01)

Last publication

OJ C 35, 28.1.2019

Past publications

OJ C 25, 21.1.2019

OJ C 16, 14.1.2019

OJ C 4, 7.1.2019

OJ C 455, 17.12.2018

OJ C 445, 10.12.2018

OJ C 436, 3.12.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 245.103-72 Government-furnished property attachments to solicitations and awards.

When performance will require the use of GFP, contracting officers shall include the GFP attachment to solicitations and awards. See PGI 245.103-72 for links to the formats and procedures for preparing the GFP attachment.

[88 FR 88537, Dec. 22, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 43 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2023

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public

              

 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 17, 2023, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Related Sites

                - White House Initiative on American Indian and Alaska Native Education
                -  Pell Grants, Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants, and other Federal Student Aid Programs
                -  Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program
                -  Strengthening Historically Black Colleges and Universities Program

## Other Resources

                - Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) - Applicant and Grantee Resources

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 3053.101 Requirements for use of forms.

Unless excepted, forms prescribed in (FAR) 48 CFR part 53 and (HSAR) 48 CFR part 3053 are required for use by all Components.

[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 48802, Aug. 22, 2006]
');
	document.write('

*The U.S. Department of Education today released the Administration's budget request for the 2019 fiscal year. The budget builds upon President Donald J. Trump’s commitment to expand educational freedom for all families and return power to local leaders. “The president’s budget request expands education freedom for America’s families while protecting our nation’s most vulnerable students,” said Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos. “The budget also reflects our commitment to spending taxpayer dollars wisely and efficiently by consolidating and eliminating ineffective federal programs that are better handled at the state or local level. I look forward to working with Congress to pass a budget that puts students first and returns power in education to where it belongs: with states, districts and families.”*

The following materials show what this budget provides for the programs and activities of the Department of Education:

- Press Release
- FY 2019 Education Budget Fact Sheet [**PDF**, 46K]
- FY 2019 Education Budget Cap Addendum  [**PDF**, 33K]
- The FY 2019 Education Budget Summary and Background Information [**PDF**, 437K] provides program information and detailed budget tables.
- The FY 2019 Justifications of Appropriations Estimates to the Congress
- FY 2019 Budget [**PDF**, 332K]

### FY 2019 Budget for the entire U.S. Government

- The President's FY 2019 Budget for the entire United States Government