8176 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 22 / Thursday, February 4, 2021 / Notices 

13See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked 

questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 

https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_

info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

14See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020). 

15See section 782(b) of the Act; see also Final 

Rule; and the frequently asked questions regarding 

the Final Rule, available at https://

enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_

final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

16See 19 CFR 351.302. 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 

FR 52067 (October 1, 2019) (Notice of Initiation). 

2These parties are: Catfish Farmers of America 

and individual U.S. catfish processors America’s 

Catch, Inc., Alabama Catfish, LLC d/b/a Harvest 

Select Catfish, Inc., Consolidated Catfish 

Companies, LLC d/b/a Country Select Catfish, Delta 

Pride Catfish, Inc.,1 Guidry’s Catfish, Inc., 

Heartland Catfish Company, Magnolia Processing, 

Inc. d/b/a Pride of the Pond, and Simmons Farm 

Raised Catfish, Inc. (collectively, domestic 

interested parties). 

period following the expiry of 

provisional measures and before 

definitive measures were put into 

place), if such a gap period is applicable 

to the POR. 

Administrative Protective Orders and 

Letters of Appearance 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with the procedures 

outlined in Commerce’s regulations at 

19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures 

apply to administrative reviews 

included in this notice of initiation. 

Parties wishing to participate in any of 

these administrative reviews should 

ensure that they meet the requirements 

of these procedures (e.g., the filing of 

separate letters of appearance as 

discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). 

Factual Information Requirements 

Commerce’s regulations identify five 

categories of factual information in 19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are 

summarized as follows: (i) Evidence 

submitted in response to questionnaires; 

(ii) evidence submitted in support of 

allegations; (iii) publicly available 

information to value factors under 19 

CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the 

adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 

351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on 

the record by Commerce; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). These regulations 

require any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also 

provide specific time limits for such 

factual submissions based on the type of 

factual information being submitted. 

Please review the Final Rule,13 available 

at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

2013/1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to 

submitting factual information in this 

segment. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.14

Any party submitting factual 

information in an AD or CVD 

proceeding must certify to the accuracy 

and completeness of that information 

using the formats provided at the end of 

the Final Rule.15 Commerce intends to 

reject factual submissions in any 

proceeding segments if the submitting 

party does not comply with applicable 

certification requirements. 

Extension of Time Limits Regulation 

Parties may request an extension of 

time limits before a time limit 

established under Part 351 expires, or as 

otherwise specified by Commerce.16 In 

general, an extension request will be 

considered untimely if it is filed after 

the time limit established under Part 

351 expires. For submissions which are 

due from multiple parties 

simultaneously, an extension request 

will be considered untimely if it is filed 

after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. 

Examples include, but are not limited 

to: (1) Case and rebuttal briefs, filed 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual 

information to value factors under 19 

CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the 

adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 

351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification 

and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments 

concerning the selection of a surrogate 

country and surrogate values and 

rebuttal; (4) comments concerning CBP 

data; and (5) Q&V questionnaires. Under 

certain circumstances, Commerce may 

elect to specify a different time limit by 

which extension requests will be 

considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, 

Commerce will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This policy also 

requires that an extension request must 

be made in a separate, stand-alone 

submission, and clarifies the 

circumstances under which Commerce 

will grant untimely-filed requests for the 

extension of time limits. Please review 

the Final Rule, available at https://

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR/2013/09/20/ 

html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 

submitting factual information in these 

segments. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: February 1, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–02348 Filed 2–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final 

Results of the Expedited Third Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen fish fillets (fish fillets) from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Reviews’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2312. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 1, 2019, Commerce 

published the Notice of Initiation of the 

five-year review of the antidumping 

duty order on fish fillets from Vietnam, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).1 On 

October 11, 2019, Commerce received a 

notice of intent to participate in this 

review from the domestic interested 

parties,2 within the deadline specified 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 22 / Thursday, February 4, 2021 / Notices 8177 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

1The petitioners are Insteel Wire Products 

Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and 

WMC Steel, LLC (collectively, the petitioners). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

12200 (April 1, 2019). 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Prestressed Concrete 

Steel Wire Strand from Thailand: Petitioners’ 

Request for 2018 Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 28, 2019. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Prestressed Concrete Steel 

Wire Strand from Thailand: Extension of Deadline 

for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018,’’ dated September 24, 

2019. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2018 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: Prestressed Concrete 

Steel Wire Strand from Thailand,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

from Thailand, 69 FR 4111 (January 28, 2004) 

(Order); see also Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand from Brazil, India, Japan, the Republic of 

Korea, Mexico, and Thailand: Continuation of the 

Antidumping Duty Finding/Orders and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 22708 (April 23, 

2015). 

in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The 

domestic interested parties claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers, 

producers, or wholesalers of a domestic 

like product in the United States. On 

October 31, 2019, the domestic 

interested parties provided a complete 

substantive response for this review 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no 

substantive responses from any other 

interested parties, nor was a hearing 

requested. As a result, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is certain frozen fish fillets. For a full 

description of the scope, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the orders 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is hereby adopted 

by this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov, and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room B8024 of the main Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on fish fillets 

from Vietnam would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and that the magnitude of the margins 

is up to 63.88 percent. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to interested parties subject to 

an APO of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and terms 

of an APO is a violation which is subject 

to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Dated: January 29, 2021. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

VI. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–02347 Filed 2–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–820] 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand From Thailand: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that The 

Siam Industrial Wire Co., Ltd. (SIW) did 

not make sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR) January 1, 2018 

through December 31, 2018. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results of review. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Smith or Samantha Kinney, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1766 or 

(202) 482–2285, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 1, 2019, based on a timely 

request for review filed by the 

petitioners,1 we initiated an 

administrative review on prestressed 

concrete steel wire strand (PC Strand) 

from Thailand for SIW,2 the only 

company for which a review was 

requested.3 In September 2019, we 

extended the preliminary results of this 

review to no later than January 31, 

2020.4 For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.5

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order 6 is 

PC Strand from Thailand. Products 

subject to the order are currently 

classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

under item numbers 7312.10.3010 and 

7312.10.3012. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to this scope is dispositive. For 

a full description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES