alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2021

                - Project abstracts:    PDF  (1.1MB)
                - List of new grantees:    MS Excel  (14K)

## FY 2016

                - Project abstracts:    PDF  (675K)
                - List of new grantees:    MS Word  (98K)

## FY 2011

                - Project abstracts:    MS Word  (666K) |  PDF  (1.02MB)

## FY 2008

Projects funded for two years
                - List of New Grantees:     MS Excel  (34K) |  PDF  (19K)
                - Abstracts for New Individual Development and Cooperative Arrangement Grants:    MS Word  (278K) |   PDF  (325K)

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1353
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:1354
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:1355
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:1356
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:1357
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:1358
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:1359
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:1360
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:1361
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 154-3 Filed: 07/23/14 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:1362
*Note:  These Congressional Budget Justifications do not include State tables. For the latest State tables, please visit the Department's State Tables page*.Volume I- Education for the Disadvantaged  PDF (1.4MB) 
- Impact Aid   PDF (1.2MB)
- School Improvement Programs  PDF (2.0MB)
- Safe Schools and Citizenship Education  PDF (2.0MB)
- Indian Education  PDF (1.2MB)  ****)
- Innovation and Improvement  PDF (1.9MB)
- English Language Acquisition  PDF (622KB)
- Special Education  PDF (1.6MB)
- Rehabilitation Services  PDF (1.9MB)
Volume II- American Printing House for the Blind  PDF (73KB)
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf  PDF (172KB)
- Gallaudet University  PDF (228KB)
- Career, Technical, and Adult Education  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Overview  PDF (232KB)
- Student Financial Assistance  PDF (1.8MB)
- TEACH Grants  PDF (1.0MB)
- Student Loans Overview  PDF (1.2MB)
- Higher Education  PDF (2.7MB)
- Howard University  PDF (222KB)
- College Housing and Academic Facilities Loans Program Account  PDF (162KB)
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program Account  PDF (301KB)
- Institute of Education Sciences  PDF (675KB)
- Salaries and Expenses Overview  PDF (553KB)
- Program Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Office for Civil Rights  PDF (474KB)
- Office of Inspector General  PDF (343KB)
  Last Modified: 02/09/2016
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.15

[LETTERHEAD]


April 25, 1997


Mr. Stephen D. Reichenbach, Executive Vice President & CFO
FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
P.O. Box 97040
Kent, WA 98064-9740

Re:  Change in Covenants

Dear Steve:


Please be advised that pursuant to the Credit Agreement dated September 25, 
1995, the following financial covenants have been amended as follows:

    Minimum Tangible Net Worth (Section 6.13):
         04/30/97 to 04/29/98                    $35,000,000
         04/30/98 and thereafter                 $50,000,000

    Calculation of the Funded Dept Ratio (defined in Section 1.1):
         "Funded Debt Ratio" means, as of the date of measurement, the
         ratio of (a) all Indebtedness of Borrower except (i) Trade Payables,
         and (ii) all accrued liabilities, deferred taxes, and minority
         interests generated in the normal course of business; to (b) the sum
         of (i) Borrower's EBITDA for the immediately preceding four fiscal
         quarters of Borrower, plus (ii) in the event Borrower has acquired any
         Subsidiaries during the immediately preceding four quarters of
         Borrower, the EBITDA of such Subsidiaries from the first day of the
         immediately preceding four quarter through the date of acquisition of
         each Subsidiary, plus (iii) any restructuring expense related to the
         disposal of assets of Borrower's access and services businesses as
         defined in the Borrower's 10K and 10Q.

Calculation of the Debt Service Coverage Ratio (defined in Section 1.1):
         "Debt Service Coverage Ratio" means the ratio of (a) the sum of (i)
         Cash Flow, plus (ii) any restructuring expense related to the disposal
         of assets of Borrower's access and services businesses as defined in
         the Borrower's 10K and 10Q; to (b) Debt Service.

<PAGE>


Mr. Steven D. Reichenbach
April 25, 1997
Page 2


Upon the acceptance by all parties, this letter will become an amendment of the
Credit Agreement dated September 25, 1995.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me.

U.S. BANK OF WASHINGTON, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

/s/ MARK E. TSUTAKAWA

    Mark E. Tsutakawa,
    Vice President



SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK



By /s/ WILLIAM P. STIVERS
       ---------------------------------
       William P. Stivers,
       Vice President

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


By /s/ STEPHEN D. REICHENBACH
       ---------------------------------
       Stephen D. Reichenbach,
       Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## Legislation

- Title IV, Part A, Subpart 7 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.   20 U.S.C. 1070e

## Regulations

- There are no program-specific regulations for this program.
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR), Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.

## Guidance

- Office of Management and Budget (OMB) -  Grants Management Circulars
- Uniform Guidance Information for ED Grantees -- Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards:  The Department has worked closely with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to streamline some federal circulars into a single guidance document, and make conforming changes to Department regulations. The old rules do not change – they are simply repackaged and enhanced to reduce burden on grantees. The new combined document is known as the "Uniform Guidance" and is codified at  2 CFR 200 . The new guidance will take effect for recipients of Federal funds for awards made on or after December 26, 2014. The new regulations do not impact any Department of Education awards received prior to this date. For program-specific questions about this new guidance,  contact your program officer .

Student Service Home
Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                              Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800
Houston, TX  77002-5218                               Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for  the  year  ended December  31, 2001 for  Dyco Oil and Gas Program
1983-2 Limited Partnership.


                              //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                              RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.




Houston, Texas
March 8, 2002
#### 3403.405 Misrepresentation or violations of the covenant against contingent fees.

Any Departmental personnel who suspect or have evidence of attempted or actual exercise of improper influence, misrepresentation of a contingent fee arrangement, or other violation of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees, must report the matter promptly in accordance with the procedures in 3403.203.
29.402-1 Foreign fixed-price contracts. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.229-6, Taxes—Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts, in solicitations and contracts expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold when a fixed-price contract is contemplated and the contract is to be performed wholly or partly in a foreign country, unless it is contemplated that the contract will be with a foreign government.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.229-7, Taxes—Fixed-Price Contracts With Foreign Governments, in solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold when a fixed-price contract with a foreign government is contemplated.
[48 FR 42293, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 52793, Dec. 21, 1990; 61 FR 39198, July 26, 1996]
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-30450, 333-65568, 333-73318, 333-104481, 333-121445 and
333-134907) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-145533) of
Proxim Wireless Corporation of our report dated March 27, 2008, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Proxim
Wireless Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, which appears in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.





/s/
Fitzgerald, Snyder & Co., P.C.





McLean,
Virginia


March 27,
2008
# First in the World Program

# Castleman-Page Study Summary
3033.211 Contracting officer's decision. For DHS contracts, the Board of Contract Appeals (BCA) noted in (FAR) 48 CFR 33.211 is the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA). The Board's address for each method of filing is as follows: ( a ) *For e-file: cbca.efile@cbca.gov .*
( b ) *U.S. Postal Service Mail:* 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.
( c ) *Overnight or Courier Delivery:* 1800 M Street NW, Room 600 South, Washington, DC 20036.
[86 FR 17316, Apr. 2, 2021]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7182

JERRY ROBERT JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-98-817-2) Submitted: January 18, 2000 Decided: February 4, 2000 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Robert Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Robert Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Angelone , No. CA-98-817-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
33.201 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Accrual of a claim* means the date when all events, that fix the alleged liability of either the Government or the contractor and permit assertion of the claim, were known or should have been known. For liability to be fixed, some injury must have occurred. However, monetary damages need not have been incurred.
*Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)* means any type of procedure or combination of procedures voluntarily used to resolve issues in controversy. These procedures may include, but are not limited to, conciliation, facilitation, mediation, fact-finding, minitrials, arbitration, and use of ombudsmen.
*Defective certification* means a certificate which alters or otherwise deviates from the language in 33.207(c) or which is not executed by a person authorized to bind the contractor with respect to the claim. Failure to certify shall not be deemed to be a defective certification.
*Issue in controversy* means a material disagreement between the Government and the contractor that ( 1 ) may result in a claim or
( 2 ) is all or part of an existing claim.
*Misrepresentation of fact* means a false statement of substantive fact, or any conduct which leads to the belief of a substantive fact material to proper understanding of the matter in hand, made with intent to deceive or mislead.
[48 FR 42349, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 50 FR 2270, Jan. 15, 1985; 56 FR 67417, Dec. 30, 1991; 59 FR 11381, Mar. 10, 1994; 60 FR 48230, Sept. 18, 1995; 63 FR 58594, Oct. 30, 1998; 66 FR 2132, Jan. 10, 2001; 67 FR 43514, June 27, 2002; 79 FR 24212, Apr. 29, 2014]
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted **

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                December 1, 2006 | **/S/                DORRIT J. BERN**                |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Dorrit                J. Bern                        |
|                                   | Chairman                of the Board                 |
|                                   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                                 |
| Dated:                December 1, 2006 | **/S/                ERIC M. SPECTER**               |
|                                   | Eric                M. Specter                       |
|                                   | Executive                Vice President              |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer               |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000701345
<NAME> US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,094,108
<SECURITIES>                                   870,205
<RECEIVABLES>                                  300,162<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    226,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,777,416
<PP&E>                                       6,252,318
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,527,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,372,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,528,294
<BONDS>                                      2,425,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          358,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,482
<OTHER-SE>                                     633,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,372,399
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,513,824
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,929,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             256,055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                672,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (352,663)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            961,437
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   961,437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.87
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are presented net of allowances.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 43 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2023 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HCON 43 RDS 

1 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

2 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

3 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

4 June 17, 2023, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

5 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

6 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

7 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

9 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

10 Board, the event shall be— 

11 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

12 public; and 

13 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

14 Congress. 

15 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

17 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

18 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

19 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap20 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

21 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

22 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

23 for the event. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HCON 43 RDS 

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

3 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange4 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 

5 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

6 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce7 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

8 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise9 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

10 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

11 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2023. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
334.202 Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBRs). ( a ) An IBR normally should be conducted as a post-award activity. A pre-award IBR may be conducted only if— ( 1 ) The acquisition plan contains documentation that demonstrates the need and rationale for a pre-award IBR, including an assessment of the impact on the source selection schedule and the expected benefits;
( 2 ) The use of a pre-award IBR is approved in writing by the head of the contracting activity prior to the issuance of the solicitation;
( 3 ) The source selection plan and solicitation specifically addresses how the results of a pre-award IBR will be used during source selection, including any weight to be given to it in source evaluation; and
( 4 ) Specific arrangements are made, and budget authority is provided, to compensate all offerors who prepare for or participate in a pre-award IBR; and the solicitation informs prospective offerors of the means for and conditions of such compensation.
#### Samuel Rudikoff, appellee, v. Joseph Siegel, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,594.

Action for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. John D. Biggs, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

G. A. Buresh, for appellant.

Jacob Levy, for appellee; J. M. Gwin, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
# C_2018445EN.01000101.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 445/01)

Last publication

OJ C 436, 3.12.2018

Past publications

OJ C 427, 26.11.2018

OJ C 408, 12.11.2018

OJ C 399, 5.11.2018

OJ C 392, 29.10.2018

OJ C 381, 22.10.2018

OJ C 373, 15.10.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 31.102 Fixed-price contracts.

The applicable subparts of part 31 shall be used in the pricing of fixed-price contracts, subcontracts, and modifications to contracts and subcontracts whenever (a) cost analysis is performed, or (b) a fixed-price contract clause requires the determination or negotiation of costs. However, application of cost principles to fixed-price contracts and subcontracts shall not be construed as a requirement to negotiate agreements on individual elements of cost in arriving at agreement on the total price. The final price accepted by the parties reflects agreement only on the total price. Further, notwithstanding the mandatory use of cost principles, the objective will continue to be to negotiate prices that are fair and reasonable, cost and other factors considered.