alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 28, 2016

UNI1ED STA1ES DEPAR1MENT OFEDUCATION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Ms. Elizabeth Kelley

Acting Assistant Superintendent

Maryland State Department of Education

200 West Baltimore Street

Baltimore, MD 21201

Dear Ms. Kelley,

This letter is in response to Maryland's request to amend its approved Preschool Development Grant -

(PDG - D). The U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

(the Departments) approved Maryland's grant projects and scope of work on August 10, 2015. On July

11, 2016, the Maryland Department of Education submitted an amendment request, proposing to make 

an amendment to Maryland's Preschool Development Grant application.

As you are aware, the Departments have the authority to approve amendments provided that such a

change does not alter the scope or objectives of the approved proposal. On September 14, 2015, the

Departments sent a document to Project Directors describing the process by which amendments would 

be reviewed and approved or denied. To determine whether approval could be granted, the Departments

have applied the conditions noted in that document and compared it with PDG program requirements

and conditions.

Maryland requested this budget amendment due to the fact that five Judy Centers will no longer be

funded out of PDG FY 16. Maryland is requesting that the $825,000 funding amount be divided equally

among the three remaining grant years and have reflected that on the amended budget table. The

following amendment request is approved as described below:

Funds will be divided equally and distributed to four of the five Judy Centers that were not 

approved as subgrantees the first year because they were not able to offer full day PreK

programs: South Penn Elementary (Allegany LEA), Elmer Wolfe Elementary (Carroll LEA),

Cranberry Station (Carroll LEA), and George Washington Carver Elementary (St. Mary's LEA).

All four will expand to full day programs going forward.

We understand that this amendment request will not impact Maryland's overall PDG-D goals, but will

ensure Maryland can continue to make progress on its PDG-D scope of work activit ies.

Please note that this letter will be posted on the Department of Education's website as a record of the

amendment request and our approval. Any budget changes are recorded in the GRADS 360 system and

the detailed budget request is saved in the official grant file.
Page 2

We are confident that Maryland will continue its comprehensive efforts towards building successful

state systems of early learning. If you need any assistance regarding PDG-D, please do not hesitate to

contact your Project Officer, Tanesha Hembrey, at (202) 260-1719 or Tanesha.Hembrey@ed.gov .

Sincerely,

/s/

Libby Doggett

Deputy Assistant Secretary

Office of Early Learning

Office of Elementary and Secondary Education

U.S. Department of Education
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23(a)

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-02655 and 33-65384) of Connectivity Technologies Inc. of our
report dated April 18, 2000 (except for the first paragraph of Note 14, as to
which the date is May 2, 2000), with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Connectivity Technologies Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.





                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
May 2, 2000
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                      |  |                             |  |                             
|------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                    |  | Jurisdiction ofOrganization |  | Percent of CommonStock Owned
|AMCORE Bank, N.A.                     |  | United States               |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Investment Group, N.A.         |  | United States               |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Consumer Finance Company, Inc. |  | Nevada                      |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Capital Trust I                |  | Delaware                    |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|ARP Holdings, LLC                     |  | Delaware                    |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AFI Nevada, Inc.                      |  | Nevada                      |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|Property Exchange Company             |  | Illinois                    |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Investment Services, Inc.      |  | Illinois                    |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|Investors Management Group, Ltd.      |  | Iowa                        |  | 100%                        
|                                      |  |                            
|AMCORE Real Properties, LLC           |  | Delaware                    |  | 100%
32.407 Interest. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) below, the contracting officer shall charge interest on the daily unliquidated balance of all advance payments at the higher of— ( 1 ) The published prime rate of the financial institution (depository) in which the special account (see 32.409-3) is established; or
( 2 ) The rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury under 50 U.S.C. App. 1215(b)(2).
( b ) The interest rate for advance payments shall be adjusted for changes in the prime rate of the depository and the semiannual determination by the Secretary of the Treasury under 50 U.S.C. App. 1215(b)(2). The contracting officer shall obtain data from the depository on changes in the interest rate during the month. Interest shall be computed at the end of each month on the daily unliquidated balance of advance payments at the applicable daily interest rate.
( c ) Interest shall be required on contracts that are for acquisition, at cost, of property for Government ownership, if the contracts are awarded in combination with, or in contemplation of, supply contracts or subcontracts.
( d ) The agency head or designee may authorize advance payments without interest under the following types of contracts, if in the Government's interest: ( 1 ) Contracts for experimental, research, or development work (including studies, surveys, and demonstrations in socio-economic areas) with nonprofit education or research institutions.
( 2 ) Contracts solely for the management and operation of Government-owned plants.
( 3 ) Cost-reimbursement contracts with governments, including State or local governments, or their instrumentalities.
( 4 ) Other classes of contracts, or unusual cases, for which the exclusion of interest on advances is specifically authorized by agency procedures.
( e ) If a contract provides for interest-free advance payments, the contracting officer may require the contractor to charge interest on advances or downpayments to subcontractors and credit the Government for the proceeds from the interest charges. Interest rates shall be determined as described in paragraphs (a) and (b) above. The contracting officer need not require the contractor to charge interest on an advance to a subcontractor that is an institution of the kind described in paragraph (d)(1).
( f ) The contracting officer shall not allow interest charges, required by this 32.407, as reimbursable costs under cost-reimbursement contracts, whether the interest charge was incurred by the prime contractor or a subcontractor.
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2138, Jan. 10, 2001; 72 FR 27384, May 15, 2007]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc. (the
Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Judith Carré Sutfin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Judith Carré Sutfin
|Judith Carré Sutfin    
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 17, 2008         

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to AMCORE Financial, Inc. and will be retained by AMCORE Financial, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Technology Engagement and Aging.
    Date: February 19, 2021.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88eee1fafce0e3e5c8e5e9e1e4a6e6e1e0a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33555a41475b585e735e525a5f1d5d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding 
cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-02286 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Clausen W. Summers et al., Respondents, v. City of Glen Cove et al., Appellants.

In an action to declare the zoning ordinance of the defendant City of Glen Cove to be invalid and unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs’ property, on the ground that the ordinance is confiscatory in its effect, the city and its officials appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 11, 1963 upon the court’s decision and opinion after a nonjury trial, declaring that, as applied to plaintiffs’ property, the oi’dinance is unconstitutional and void, and restraining the defendants from enforcing it against plaintiffs’ property. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed. Findings of fact implicit or contained in the decision and opinion of the Special Term, insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith, are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, plaintiffs failed to prove that their property cannot be used for the purposes permitted by the ordinance. At best, on this record, the issue of the validity of the ordinance is fairly debatable; hence, the ordinance may not be held to be confiscatory and unconstitutional *(Shepard*v. *Village of Skaneateles,*300 N. Y. 115; *Gerzof*v. *Town of Huntington,*8 A D 2d 841, affd. 8 N Y 2d 788). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld and Rabin, JJ., concur; Hill and Hopkins, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment.
#### ROGERS v. FINE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

February 27, 1906.)

1. Courts—Municipal Courts—Procedure.

Although the Municipal Court act does in terms provide for a dismissal of a written complaint on the ground that it does not state a cause of action unless a written demurrer has been interposed, the power to so dismiss must be deemed to be inherent in the court.

2. Same—Dismissal of Complaint—Right to Amend.

Under Municipal Court Act, Laws 1902, p. 1536, c. 580, § 145, subd. 4, the allowance of an amendment is made obligatory when a written demurrer is sustained, and by analogy it is the duty of the court to allow an amendment upon the granting of a motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the complaint, which is, in effect, an oral demurrer.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Eleventh District.

Action by Morris Rogers against Abraham' Fine and others. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

• Argued' before SCOTT, P. J., and GIEGERICH and GREEN-BAUM, JJ. ... . . ■ • '

Gustavus A. Rogers, for appellant.

*1005PER CURIAM.

Although the Municipal Court act does not, in terms, provide for a dismissal of a written complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action unless a written demurrer has been interposed, we think that the power to so dismiss must be deemed to be inherent in the court (Morris v. Hunken, 40 App. Div. 129, 57 N. Y. Supp. 712), because it would be idle to permit the plaintiff to prove a state of facts which when proven could result only in a nonsuit. When such a motion is granted, however, the plaintiff should be allowed to amend, so as, if possible, to cure the defect. The allowance of such an amendment is made obligatory by subdivision 4, § 145, of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1536, c. 580), when a written demurrer is sustained, and by analogy should follow upon the granting of a motion to dismiss for insufficiency, which is, in effect, an oral demurrer. The justice erred in refusing plaintiff’s application for leave to amend, and the judgment must for that reason be reversed.

Judgement reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
22.804-2 Construction. ( a ) Construction contractors that hold a nonexempt (see 22.807) Government construction contract are required to meet ( 1 ) the contract terms and conditions citing affirmative action requirements applicable to covered geographical areas or projects and
( 2 ) applicable requirements of 41 CFR 60-1 and 60-4.
( b ) Each agency shall maintain a listing of covered geographical areas that are subject to affirmative action requirements that specify goals for minorities and women in covered construction trades. Information concerning, and additions to, this listing will be provided to the principally affected contracting officers in accordance with agency procedures. Any contracting officer contemplating a construction project in excess of $10,000 within a geographic area not known to be covered by specific affirmative action goals shall request instructions on the most current information from the OFCCP regional office, or as otherwise specified in agency regulations, before issuing the solicitation.
( c ) Contracting officers shall give written notice to the OFCCP regional office within 10 working days of award of a construction contract subject to these affirmative action requirements. The notification shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the contractor; employer identification number; dollar amount of the contract; estimated starting and completion dates of the contract; the contract number; and the geographical area in which the contract is to be performed. When requested by the OFCCP regional office, the contracting officer shall arrange a conference among contractor, contracting activity, and compliance personnel to discuss the contractor's compliance responsibilities.
[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 70284, Dec. 18, 1998]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 472 

Designating April 5, 2018, as ‘‘Gold Star Wives Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2018 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. HELLER) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 5, 2018, as ‘‘Gold Star Wives Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate honors the sacrifices made by the 

spouses and families of the fallen members of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; 

Whereas Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. represents the 

spouses and families of the members and veterans of the 

Armed Forces of the United States who have died on active duty or as a result of a service-connected disability; 

Whereas the primary mission of Gold Star Wives of America, 

Inc. is to provide services, support, and friendship to the 

spouses of the fallen members and veterans of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; 

Whereas, in 1945, Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. was organized with the help of Eleanor Roosevelt to assist the 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 472 ATS 

families left behind by the fallen members and veterans 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

Whereas the first meeting of Gold Star Wives of America, 

Inc. was held on April 5, 1945; 

Whereas April 5, 2018, marks the 73rd anniversary of the 

first meeting of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.; 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces of 

the United States bear the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States 

should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 5, 2018, as ‘‘Gold Star 

3 Wives Day’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes— 

5 (A) the contributions of the members of 

6 Gold Star Wives of America, Inc.; and 

7 (B) the dedication of the members of Gold 

8 Star Wives of America, Inc. to the members 

9 and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United 

10 States; and 

11 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe Gold Star Wives Day to promote aware13 ness of— 

14 (A) the contributions and dedication of the 

15 members of Gold Star Wives of America, Inc. 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 472 ATS 

1 to the members and veterans of the Armed 

2 Forces of the United States; and 

3 (B) the important role that Gold Star 

4 Wives of America, Inc. plays in the lives of the 

5 spouses and families of the fallen members and 

6 veterans of the Armed Forces of the United 

7 States. 

Æ 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1




EXHIBIT 21--SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     Terre Haute First National Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant. It is an national banking association. It is an Indiana
corporation. The bank conducts its business under the name of Terre Haute First
National Bank.

     First State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. It is a
state corporation in Indiana. The bank conducts its business under the name of
First State Bank.

     First Citizens State Bank of Newport is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant. It is a state corporation in Indiana. The bank conducts its business
under the name of First Citizens State Bank

     First Farmers State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. It
is a state corporation in Indiana. The bank conducts its business under the name
of First Farmers State Bank.

     First Ridge Farm State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant.
It is a state corporation in Illinois. The bank conducts its business under the
name of First Ridge Farm State Bank.

     First Parke State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. It
is a state corporation in Indiana. The bank conducts its business under the name
of First Parke State Bank.

     First National Bank of Marshall is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant. It is a national banking association. It is an Illinois
corporation. The bank conducts its business under the name of First National
Bank.

     First Crawford State Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant.
It is a state corporation in Illinois. The bank conducts its business under the
name of First Crawford State Bank.

     The Morris Plan Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant. It
is a state corporation in Indiana. The company conducts its business under the
name of The Morris Plan Company of Terre Haute,Inc.


                                        36
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

 OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION

2021 Negotiated Rulemaking

Affordability and Student Loans Committee

I. Introductions 

II. Proposed Regulatory Language

a. Issue #12: Pell grant eligibility for prison education 

programs

b. Issue #1: Total and permanent disability discharge

c. Issue #2: Closed school discharge

d. Issue #3: Eliminate interest capitalization for non-statutory 

capitalization events

e. Issue #4: Improving the Public Service Loan Forgiveness 

(PSLF) Application Process

f. Issue #5: PSLF employer eligibility and full-time 

employment

g. Issue #6: Borrower defense to repayment – adjudication 

process

h. Issue #7: Borrower defense to repayment – postadjudication

i. Issue #8: Borrower defense to repayment – recovery from 

institutions

j. Issue #9: Pre-dispute arbitration

k. Issue #10: Creating a new income-driven repayment plan

l. Issue #11: False certification discharge

III. Public Comment

Last updated 10/25/2021