alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Home |
|                                                              |

                  - NAME:
                  - **Carmen Sanchez**
                  - EMAIL:
                  - carmen.sanchez@ed.gov
                  - MAIL:
                  -  U.S. Department of Education, OSERSOffice of Special Education Programs400 Maryland Ave., SW, PCP 5162Washington, DC 20202-2600
                  - PHONE: 
                  - 202-245-6595
                  - TDD:
                  - If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 168 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Council on Environmental 

Quality relating to ‘‘National Environmental Policy Act Implementing 

Regulations Revisions Phase 2’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. DUARTE, Mr. CURTIS, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. GOLDEN of Maine, 

Mrs. BICE, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 

HUDSON, and Mr. ROY) submitted the following joint resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Council on Environmental Quality relating to ‘‘National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations Revisions Phase 2’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 Council on Environmental Quality relating to ‘‘National 

5 Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations ReviVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:33 Jun 19, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ168.IH HJ168

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HJ 168 IH 

1 sions Phase 2’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 35442 (May 1, 2024)), and 

2 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert J. Davis,
the Chief Financial Officer of Liberator Medical Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.          This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2.          The
information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Dated: August 14, 2012 |  | /s/ Robert J. Davis                     
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                       |  | Robert J. Davis, Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Flava Works, Inc

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05844

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

FF Magnat Limited, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, July 2, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Status hearing held on

7/2/2013. Plaintiff is to serve defendant by 10/19/2013. Status hearing set for 10/23/2013

at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (gds)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 93 Filed: 07/02/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2338
### ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form , Revision 2
. 5 Page 1 of 1 1/15/10 

### AD Title: Front Combustion L iner Wall Inspection
- RB211
- 524,
- 535,
- Trent700, Trent 800 Docket No. FAA
- Directorate Identifier: 2010
- NE
- XX
- AD **Costs:** Costs per **Product** (e.g., engine, propeller) Action ( e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work
h ours Labor cost ( @ $8 5 /hour) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U
. S
. Fleet Inspection 1.5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 46 $ 5,865 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0



### Total Cost s of compliance for U
. S
. fleet: $ 5,865



### Costs covered und er warranty $0 **Special considerations for Econom**  **ic Analysis :**  This document takes into account the removal of the RB211
- 535E4 from the AD. That resulted in 193 engines no longer being required to comply. 

### Executive Order 12866 **:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES explain below NO **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES explain below NO **Regul atory Flexibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES explain below NO **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska . Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES explain below NO 

### Explanation: Ref: SP3023EN
- E, MCAI 2009
- 0243R1
# C_2018173EN.01000201.xml

| 22.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 May 2018

(2018/C 173/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1781 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4483 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87325 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3073 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1773 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,40 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5773 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,590 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 317,68 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2950 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6323 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,2714 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5673 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5074 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2480 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7049 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5828 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 273,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9430 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5147 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3840 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 666,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6794 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,742 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,2150 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,929 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3831 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2982 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,1115 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1781

JPY

Japanese yen

130,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4483

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87325

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3073

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1773

ISK

Iceland króna

123,40

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5773

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,590

HUF

Hungarian forint

317,68

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2950

RON

Romanian leu

4,6323

TRY

Turkish lira

5,2714

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5673

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5074

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2480

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7049

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5828

KRW

South Korean won

1 273,37

ZAR

South African rand

14,9430

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5147

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3840

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 666,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6794

PHP

Philippine peso

61,742

RUB

Russian rouble

73,2150

THB

Thai baht

37,929

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3831

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2982

INR

Indian rupee

80,1115

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                             COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (Section  1350 of
Chapter  63 of Title 18 of the  United  States  Code),  each of the  undersigned
officers of Commerce  Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with
respect to the  Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 19, 2004                                   /s/    Vernon W. Hill, II
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Vernon W. Hill, II
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 19, 2004                                   /s/   Douglas J. Pauls
                                                       ----------------------
                                                       Douglas J. Pauls
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and is not  being  filed  as part of the  Report  or as a
separate disclosure document.
#### 3009.108-70 Prohibition on contracts with corporate expatriates.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, Title IV, Part A, Subpart 2, Chapter 2
                - 20 U.S.C 1070a-21—1070a-28  |    MS Word  (86K) |  PDF  (84K)

## Regulations

                - Title 34 Code of Federal Regulations part 694
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR)  in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

Student Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 167 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 167

   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture 
  relating to ``Use of Electronic Identification Eartags as Official 
                 Identification in Cattle and Bison''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2024

 Ms. Hageman (for herself, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Biggs, Ms. Boebert, Mr. 
Brecheen, Mr. Crane, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Gosar, Ms. Maloy, Mr. Massie, Mr. 
    Ogles, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Smith of 
 Missouri, and Mrs. Spartz) submitted the following joint resolution; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture 
  relating to ``Use of Electronic Identification Eartags as Official 
                 Identification in Cattle and Bison''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Agriculture relating to ``Use of 
Electronic Identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle 
and Bison'' published in the Federal Register on May 9, 2024 (89 Fed. 
Reg. 39540 et seq.), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 418 

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2018 as ‘‘National 

Rosie the Riveter Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2018 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. COONS, Mr. ISAKSON, and Mr. MANCHIN) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2018 

as ‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’. 

Whereas National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise awareness of the 16,000,000 women 

who worked during World War II; 

Whereas the people of the United States have chosen to 

honor women workers who contributed from the home 

front during World War II; 

Whereas those women left their homes to work or volunteer 

full-time in factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, 

banks, and other institutions in support of the Armed 

Forces overseas; 

Whereas those women worked with the United Service Organizations and the American Red Cross, drove trucks, rivVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:43 Feb 28, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR418.ATS SR418

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 418 ATS 

eted airplane parts, collected critical materials, rolled 

bandages, and served on rationing boards; 

Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the 

history and legacy of working women, including volunteer 

women, during World War II to promote cooperation and 

fellowship among those women and their descendants; 

Whereas those women and their descendants wish to further 

the advancement of patriotic ideas, excellence in the 

workplace, and loyalty to the United States; and 

Whereas March 21, 2018, during Women’s History Month, is 

an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘National Rosie the 

Riveter Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of March 21, 2018 

3 as ‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the important role played by 

5 women during World War II. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Runway Inn, Inc., Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review and annul a determination of the State Liquor Authority, dated May 18, 1961, suspending for 10 days petitioner’s restaurant liquor license on the ground that it had violated subdivision 1 of section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law by serving alcoholic beverages to a minor under 18 years of age. By order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, made June 7, 1961, pursuant to section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act, the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7190
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LUIS ENSUNCHO, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-51-A, CA-97-826-AM) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luis Ensuncho, Appellant Pro Se. John Patrick Rowley, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ensuncho , Nos. CR-91-51-A; CA-97-826-AM (E.D. Va. June 9, 1997). We also deny Appellant's motion to prevent his transfer to another facility. Inmates have no liberty interest in placement in a particular prison and prison officials have broad discretion in determining at which facility to house an inmate. See Cochran v. Morris , 73 F.3d 1310, 1318 (4th Cir. 1996) (citing Meachum v. Fano , 427 U.S. 215, 224 (1976)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### 336.104 Policy.

Contracting officers shall follow the policies described in Federal Acquisition Regulation 36.104 and the guidance promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services Facilities Management.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

h0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147905

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147905

COA: 317015

Jackson CC: 12-004469-FC

TIMOTHY ALAN EBRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### 3052.205-70 Advertisements, Publicizing Awards, and Releases.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3005.470-2, insert the following clause:

# Advertisements, Publicizing Awards, and Releases (SEP 2012)

The Contractor shall not refer to this contract in commercial advertising or similar promotions in such a manner as to state or imply that the product or service provided is endorsed or preferred by the Federal Government or is considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (SEP 2012). If a contract involves sensitive or classified information, designate the paragraph in the base clause as (a) and add the following paragraph (b) to the clause:

(b) All advertisements, releases, announcements, or other publication regarding this contract or the agency programs and projects covered under it, or the results or conclusions made pursuant to performance, must be approved by the Contracting Officer. Under no circumstances shall the Contractor, or anyone acting on behalf of the Contractor, refer to the supplies, services, or equipment furnished pursuant to the provisions of this contract in any publicity, release, or commercial advertising without first obtaining explicit written consent to do so from the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[77 FR 50636, Aug. 22, 2012]
#### Adel Lumber Company *v.*Sorrell.

January 25, 1913.

Injunction. Before Judge Thomas. Colquitt superior court. June 10, 1912.

*J. Z. Jackson,*for plaintiff in error. 17. *F. Way,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

In view of the uncertainty of description of the property in the timber lease, and the conflict of testimony as to the terms of the original agreement of sale, and whether or not there had been an alteration of the lease since its execution, the judge did not abuse his discretion on interlocutory hearing in granting a temporary injunction.

*.Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*