alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### *In re*Bradley.

*A*judgment was rendered on January 27th, 1875, disbarring an atlorney from tbe courts of this state. On February 15th, 1876, an act was passed providing that “ all proceedings of every kind in any court of this state, to set aside judgment and decrees of the courts, must be made within three years from the rendition of said judgments or decrees.” On May 24th. 1879, a motion was made to set aside the order of removal:

' *Held,*that the motion was barred by the statute. If injustice has been' done the movant, his own *laches*prevents this court from granting him relief.

Statute of limitations. Motions. Attorneys. Before Judge Fleming. Chatham Superior Court. May Term, 1879.

Reported in the decision.

*536A. A. Bradley, in *propriapersona,*for plaintiff in error.

II. B. Tompkins, by S. B. Adams, *contra.*,

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was a motion made in the court below to set aside a judgment removing the plaintiff in error as a practising lawyer in the courts of this state. The court refused the motion, and the movant excepted. It appears from the record that the judgment of removal was rendered on the 27th of January, 1875. The motion to set aside and vacate the judgment was made on the 24th of May, 1879, more than three years after its rendition, and more than three years after the passage of the act, February 15th, 1876, which declares,-that from aud after its passage “all proceedings of every kind in any court of this state, to set aside judgments and decrees of the courts, must be made within three years from the rendition of said judgments •or decrees.” The plaintiff in error insists that the judgment of removal was illegal, and did him great injustice. However that may have been, it is now too late for us to relieve him in view of the express provisions of the act of 1876, which absolutely barred' his remedy to set the judgment aside before he made his motion for that purpose. If the plaintiff in error has had injustice done him, we can only regret that his own *laches,*under the stern provisions -of the act of 1876, will prevent this .court from affording him any relief, however willingly we.would otherwise have •done so. The statute of the state speaks like a tyrant, and •courts and people are bound to obey it.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
32.409-1 Recommendation for approval. If recommending approval, the contracting officer shall transmit the following, under agency procedures, to the approving authority: ( a ) Contract data, including— ( 1 ) Identification and date of the award;
( 2 ) Citation of the appropriation;
( 3 ) Type and dollar amount of the contract;
( 4 ) Items to be supplied, schedule of deliveries or performance, and status of any deliveries or performance;
( 5 ) The contract fee or profit contemplated; and
( 6 ) A copy of the contract, if available.
( b ) The contractor's request and supporting information.
( c ) A report on the contractor's past performance, responsibility, technical ability, and plant capacity.
( d ) Comments on ( 1 ) the contractor's need for advance payments and
( 2 ) potential Government benefits from the contract performance.
( e ) Proposed advance payment contract terms, including proposed security requirements.
( f ) The findings, determination, and authorization (see 32.410).
( g ) The recommendation for approval of the advance payment request.
( h ) Justification of any proposal for waiver of interest charges (see 32.407).
**  Exhibit      10.1**

**                                                                     Schedule      1**

| **CHANGE                OF CONTROL**           |
|------------------------------------------------|
| **SEVERANCE                PLAN PARTICIPANTS** |
|                                           |   |
| **NAME**                                       | **BENEFIT****LEVEL** |
|                                           |   |
| Rainwater,                G L                  | 3 |
| Baxter,                Warner L                | 3 |
| Cisel,                Scott A                  | 3 |
| Cole,                Daniel F                  | 3 |
| Sullivan,                Steven R              | 3 |
| Voss,                Thomas R                  | 3 |
| Kelley,                Richard A               | 3 |
| Whiteley,                David A               | 3 |
| Martin,                Donna K                 | 3 |
| Mark,                Richard J                 | 3 |
| Naslund,                Charles D              | 3 |
| Nelson,                Gregory L               | 3 |
|                                           |   |
| Birdsong,                Jerre E               | 2 |
| Birk,                Mark C                    | 2 |
| Borkowski,                Maureen A            | 2 |
| Bremer,                Charles A               | 2 |
| Davis,                Jimmy Lowell             | 2 |
| Evans,                Ronald K                 | 2 |
| Glaeser,                Scott A                | 2 |
| Herrmann,                Timothy E             | 2 |
| Heflin,                Adam C                  | 2 |
| Iselin,                Chris A                 | 2 |
| Lindgren,                Mark C                | 2 |
| Lyons,                Jr., Martin J            | 2 |
| Menne,                Michael L                | 2 |
| Moehn,                Michael                  | 2 |
| Mueller,                Michael G              | 2 |
| Neff,                Robert K                  | 2 |
| Nelson,                Craig D                 | 2 |
| Power,                Joseph M                 | 2 |
| Powers,                Robert L                | 2 |
| Prebil,                William J               | 2 |
| Schepers,                David J               | 2 |
| Schukar,                Shawn                  | 2 |
| Serri,                Andrew M                 | 2 |
| Simpson,                Jerry Lee              | 2 |
| Sobule,                James A                 | 2 |
| Weisenborn,                Dennis W            | 2 |
| Zdellar,                Ronald C               | 2 |
|                                           |   |
3017.202 Use of options. ( a ) Contracting officers shall not use unpriced options.
Case 2:12-cv-01057-GMN -RJJ   Document 83-56    Filed 08/07/12   Page 2 of 2Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-17 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:836

Case 2:12-cv-01057-G

MN

 -RJJ   D

ocument 83-60    F

iled 08/07/12   Page 2 of 2

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-17 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:837
#### 252.232-7009 Mandatory payment by Governmentwide commercial purchase card.

As prescribed in 232.1110, use the following clause:

# Mandatory Payment by Governmentwide Commercial Purchase Card (MAY 2018)

The Contractor agrees to accept the Governmentwide commercial purchase card as the method of payment for orders or calls valued at or below the micro-purchase threshold in part 202 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, under this contract or agreement.

(End of clause)

[65 FR 46626, July 31, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 75893, Dec. 19, 2006; 83 FR 24896, May 30, 2018]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 12-cv-5598

)

v. ) Hon. Milton I. Shadur

)

CAPITAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT ) Hon. Jeffery Cole

LLC and RICHARD P. TURASKY, JR., )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF MOTION

To: See Service List on attached Certificate of Service

Please take notice that on June 15, 2015 at 9:15 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel 

may be heard, I shall appear before The Honorable Milton I. Shadur or any judge sitting in his 

stead, in courtroom 2303 of the Dirksen Federal Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, 

Illinois, and present Arlington Capital and Richard Turasky’s Motion for Leave to File Instanter

Their Response to Alleged Contemnors’ Colorado River Abstention Request Separate from 

Their Response to the Emergency Motion to Vacate Rule to Show Cause, a copy of which has 

been served upon you.

Respectfully submitted,

Capital Realty & Development LLC and 

Richard P. Turasky, Jr.

 By: /s/ Paul J. Kozacky

One of their attorneys

Paul J. Kozacky

Jessica F. Garro

Brian P. O’Connor

KOZACKY WEITZEL MCGRATH, P.C.

55 W. Monroe St., Ste. 2400

Chicago, Illinois 60603

(312) 696-0900

Case: 1:12-cv-05598 Document #: 203 Filed: 06/11/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2376
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Brian P. O’Connor, an attorney, certify that I caused a copy of this NOTICE OF 

MOTION and related MOTION to be served on the following persons via ECF before the hour 

of 4:00 p.m. on June 11, 2015:

Service List

Vincent Thomas Borst

Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd. 

180 N. LaSalle Street 

Suite 3300 

Chicago, IL 60601 

vborst@rsplaw.com

Lawrence W. Byrne 

Pedersen & Houpt 

161 N. Clark St. 

Suite 3100 

Chicago, IL 60606 

lbyrne@pedersenhoupt.com

Catherine A. Cooke 

Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd. 

180 N. LaSalle Street 

Suite 3300 

Chicago, IL 60601 

ccooke@rsplaw.com

Trent P. Cornell 

Pedersen & Houpt 

161 North Clark Street 

Suite 3100 

Chicago, IL 60601 

tcornell@stahlcowen.com

 

Craig Edward Donnelly 

Roberts McGivney Zagotta LLC 

55 West Monroe 

Suite 1700 

Chicago, IL 60603 

cdonnelly@rmczlaw.com

Kimberly Ann Doucas 

Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd. 

180 N. LaSalle Street 

Suite 3300 

Chicago, IL 60601 

kdoucas@rsplaw.com

Patrick J. Keating 

Roberts McGivney Zagotta LLC 

55 W. Monroe Street 

Suite 1700 

Chicago, IL 60603 

pkeating@rmczlaw.com

Philip J. Nathanson

The Nathanson Law Firm

120 North LaSalle Street

Suite 1040

Chicago, IL 60602

philipj@nathansonlawfirm.com

Jeffery R. Beck

Brown, Udell, Pomerantz & Delrahim, Ltd.

1332 N Halsted, Ste 100, Chicago, IL 60642

jbeck@bupdlaw.com

/s/ Brian P. O’Connor

Case: 1:12-cv-05598 Document #: 203 Filed: 06/11/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2377
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Title III, Part A, Sec 319 of the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, as amended  
                - Title III, Part F, Sec 371 of the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, as amended 

## Regulations

                - There are no program-specific regulations for this program.
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
*Strengthening  Institutions include institutions that are not participating in the other MSI  programs but have at least 50 percent of their degree students receiving need

-based  assistance under Title IV of the Higher Education Act or have a substantial  number of enrolled students receiving Pell Grants, and have low educational and  general expenditures.

### How to Apply for Funding: HEERF  II-Strenghtening Institutions Program (CFDA 84.425M)

*Note:  New applications are not required. Supplements will be automatically awarded.*

- Grants.gov  Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants
- Guide  to how to apply for funding in Grants.gov 
- How to upload a Workspace   Applicant Overview Training for  Grants.gov  Training Resources for Grants.gov  Endowment Excise Tax Form for Submission  Note: Only institutions subject to the tax described are required to complete and submit this form once.
Supplemental Agreement: (a)(2) Strengthening  Institutions Program (CFDA 84.425M) (NEW)
*Note: This is  for institutions that did not previously receive HEERF SIP funding and that are  included in the CRRSAA Section 314(a)(2). This document is provided for  reference as an example of the agreement that will be attached to your  institution’s supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the supplement  is automatically made*
Supplemental Agreement: (a)(2) Strenghtening Institutions Program (CFDA  84.425M) (Purple)
*Note: This is for institutions that   received CARES Act HEERF Strengthening Institutions Program funding. This document is provided  for reference as an example of the agreement that will be attached to your  institution’s supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the supplement  is automatically made.*
**Notice Inviting Applications:** (a)(2) Supplemental Assistance for Strengthening Institutions  Program (CFDA 84.425M)Formula allocations- Allocations for Section 314(a)(2) of CRRSAA Act
- Methodology for Calculating Allocations
Frequently Asked Questions- (a)(2) Frequently Asked Questions  Updated

  Return to the CRRSAA HEERF II Website here.
  Last Modified: 04/21/2021
242.1104 Surveillance requirements. ( a ) The cognizant contract administration office (CAO)— ( i ) Shall perform production surveillance on all contractors that have Criticality Designator A or B contracts;
( ii ) Shall not perform production surveillance on contractors that have only Criticality Designator C contracts, unless specifically requested by the contracting officer; and
( iii ) When production surveillance is required, shall— ( A ) Conduct a periodic risk assessment of the contractor to determine the degree of production surveillance needed for all contracts awarded to that contractor. The risk assessment shall consider information provided by the contractor and the contracting officer;
( B ) Develop a production surveillance plan based on the risk level determined during a risk assessment;
( C ) Modify the production surveillance plan to incorporate any special surveillance requirements for individual contracts, including any requirements identified by the contracting officer; and
( D ) Monitor contract progress and identify potential contract delinquencies in accordance with the production surveillance plan. Contracts with Criticality Designator C are exempt from this requirement unless specifically requested by the contracting officer.
[69 FR 31912, June 8, 2004]
#### In the Matter of Monroe S. Wasch, Appellant, v. Ivan Warner, as Chairman of the Democratic County Committee of Bronx County, et al., Respondents.

Order entered August 31, 1964, denying an application to compel respondents to certify and authenticate a proposed list of election inspectors unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the authority of *Matter of Sheehan*v. *McMahon*(44 App. Div. 63) (cf. *People ex rel. McGarren*v. *Dooling,*128 App. Div. 1). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Tálente, McNally, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: July 18, 2007



By

/S/    Takeo FukuiName:

Takeo FukuiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
37.103 Contracting officer responsibility. ( a ) The contracting officer is responsible for ensuring that a proposed contract for services is proper. For this purpose the contracting officer shall— ( 1 ) Determine whether the proposed service is for a personal or nonpersonal services contract using the definitions at 2.101 and 37.101 and the guidelines in 37.104;
( 2 ) In doubtful cases, obtain the review of legal counsel; and
( 3 ) Document the file (except as provided in paragraph (b) below) with ( i ) the opinion of legal counsel, if any,
( ii ) a memorandum of the facts and rationale supporting the conclusion that the contract does not violate the provisions in 37.104(b), and
( iii ) any further documentation that the contracting agency may require.
( b ) Nonpersonal services contracts are exempt from the requirements of subparagraph (a)(3) above.
( c ) Ensure that performance-based acquisition methods are used to the maximum extent practicable when acquiring services.
( d ) Ensure that contracts for child care services include requirements for criminal history background checks on employees who will perform child care services under the contract in accordance with 34 U.S.C. 20351 and agency procedures.
( e ) Ensure that service contractor reporting requirements are met in accordance with subpart 4.17, Service Contracts Inventory.
[48 FR 42365, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 36796, Sept. 6, 1990; 59 FR 67051, Dec. 28, 1994; 62 FR 233, Jan. 2, 1997; 62 FR 44815, Aug. 22, 1997; 62 FR 51379, Oct. 1, 1997; 66 FR 2133, Jan. 10, 2001; 71 FR 218, Jan. 3, 2006; 78 FR 80375, Dec. 31, 2013; 86 FR 3687, Jan. 14, 2021]
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

DCN:_____10033___________________________ 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 84 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 84

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2024

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively to 
   the 23d Headquarters Special Troops and the 3133d Signal Services 
 Company, known collectively as the ``Ghost Army'', in recognition of 
      unique and highly distinguished service during World War II.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO ``GHOST ARMY''.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on March 21, 2024, for a ceremony to present 
the Congressional

              

 Gold Medal collectively to the 23d Headquarters Special Troops and the 
3133d Signal Services Company, known collectively as the ``Ghost 
Army'', in recognition of unique and highly distinguished service 
during World War II.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### 252.245-7002 [Reserved]
# C_2018295EN.01000101.xml

| 21.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 August 2018

(2018/C 295/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1420 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4588 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89478 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4918 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1366 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6720 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,706 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,53 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3037 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,9863 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5631 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4927 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9645 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7255 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5665 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 281,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6561 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8351 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4170 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 661,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6828 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,953 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,7235 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,726 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4818 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6300 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,7400 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1420

JPY

Japanese yen

126,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4588

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89478

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4918

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1366

ISK

Iceland króna

123,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6720

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,706

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,53

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3037

RON

Romanian leu

4,6490

TRY

Turkish lira

6,9863

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5631

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4927

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9645

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7255

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5665

KRW

South Korean won

1 281,69

ZAR

South African rand

16,6561

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8351

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4170

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 661,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6828

PHP

Philippine peso

60,953

RUB

Russian rouble

76,7235

THB

Thai baht

37,726

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4818

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6300

INR

Indian rupee

79,7400

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
24.302 Contract clause. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at FAR 52.224-3, Privacy Training, in solicitations and contracts when, on behalf of the agency, contractor employees will— ( 1 ) Have access to a system of records;
( 2 ) Create, collect, use, process, store, maintain, disseminate, disclose, dispose, or otherwise handle personally identifiable information; or
( 3 ) Design, develop, maintain, or operate a system of records.
( b ) When an agency specifies that only its agency-provided training is acceptable, use the clause with its Alternate I.
Amendment No. 1 to the Barnes Group Inc. Retirement Benefit Equalization Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Amendment No. 1 to the Barnes Group Inc. 
 Retirement Benefit Equalization Plan
(“RBEP”) 
  
 Amendment No. 1

 Section 3.1 of the RBEP is amended effective January 1, 2009, by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 
 An employee who satisfies the minimum criteria set forth in Section 3.2 shall be deemed to have been designated by the Committee as a
Participant, unless the Committee takes action before the end of the period in which such minimum criteria are satisfied to exclude such employee from participation in this Plan. 
  
 Amended: 7/22/09