alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 339 

Designating November 2017 as ‘‘National Runaway Prevention Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2017 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Mr. HATCH, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

LEAHY, and Mr. REED) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 2017 as ‘‘National Runaway 

Prevention Month’’. 

Whereas the prevalence of runaway youth and homelessness 

among youth is staggering, with studies suggesting that 

every year, between 1,600,000 and 2,800,000 youth live 

on the streets of the United States; 

Whereas runaway youth most often are youth who have been 

expelled from their homes by their families, have experienced abuse and trauma, are involved in the foster care 

system, are too poor to secure their own basic needs, and 

may be ineligible or unable to access medical or mental 

health resources; 

Whereas youth who run away are at an increased risk for exploitation and exposure to criminal networks, such as domestic sex trafficking; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 339 ATS 

Whereas youth who run away are more likely to be recruited 

or coerced into participating in criminal acts, such as 

gangs and illegal substance abuse, that lead to a higher 

likelihood of involvement in the criminal justice system; 

Whereas preventing youth from running away from home or 

from foster care and supporting youth in high-risk situations is a family, community, and national responsibility; 

Whereas the future well-being of the Nation is dependent on 

the value placed on youth and the opportunities provided 

for youth to acquire the knowledge, skills, and abilities 

necessary to help youth successfully develop into safe, 

healthy, and productive adults; 

Whereas effective programs supporting runaway youth and 

assisting youth and their families in providing safe and 

stable homes succeed because of partnerships created 

among families, youth-based advocacy organizations, 

community-based human service agencies, law enforcement, schools, faith-based organizations, and businesses; 

and 

Whereas the National Network for Youth and National Runaway Safeline are cosponsoring National Runaway Prevention Month in November to increase public awareness 

of the issues facing runaway and homeless youth and to 

educate the public about solutions and the role the public 

can play in ending youth homelessness: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates November 2017 as ‘‘National 

3 Runaway Prevention Month’’; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 339 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes and supports the goals and ideals 

2 of National Runaway Prevention Month. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2017220EN.01005501.xml

| 8.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/55

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 July 2017

(2017/C 220/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1412 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4371 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88488 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6155 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0983 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5613 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,079 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,38 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2322 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5862 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1465 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5006 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4806 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9140 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5669 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5761 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 318,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2646 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7590 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4153 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 300,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9054 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,786 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,9193 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,892 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7587 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7488 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,6955 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1412

JPY

Japanese yen

129,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4371

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88488

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6155

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0983

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5613

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,079

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,38

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2322

RON

Romanian leu

4,5862

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1465

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5006

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4806

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9140

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5669

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5761

KRW

South Korean won

1 318,10

ZAR

South African rand

15,2646

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7590

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4153

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 300,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9054

PHP

Philippine peso

57,786

RUB

Russian rouble

68,9193

THB

Thai baht

38,892

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7587

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7488

INR

Indian rupee

73,6955

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-217-2020]

On December 8, 2020, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Illinois International Port District, grantee of FTZ 22, requesting an expansion of Subzone 22F subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 22, on behalf of Abbott Laboratories, in Itasca, Illinois.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (85 FR 80770-80771, December 14, 2020). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 22F was approved on February 1, 2021, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 22's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: February 1, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

 [FR Doc. 2021-02514 Filed 2-5-21; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
3405.203 Publicizing and response time. ( c ) FSA—Notwithstanding other provisions of the FAR, a bid or proposal due date of less than 30 days is permitted after issuance of a synopsis for acquisitions for noncommercial items. However, if time permits, a bid or proposal due date that affords potential offerors reasonable time to respond and fosters quality submissions should be established.
Serial: 231564 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 89-R-99001-SCT 

# FILED INRE: THERULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 

## MAY 05 

## 2020 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS EN BANC ORDER Beforethe enbane Courtis theMotiontoAmendM.R.C.P. 

### 1(MotionNo. 2020-400), filed by the Advisory Committee on Rules. After due consideration, we find that the motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Amend M.R.C.P. 

### 1 is granted. Rule 1 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. The amendment shall be effective
on July 1, 2020. ITIS FURTHERORDEREDthatthe Clerk ofthis Courtmust spreadthis orderupon the minutes of the Court and send a certified copy to West Publishing Company for publication in the advance sheets ofSouthern Reporter, ThirdSeries (Mississippi Edition), and in the next edition ofthe Mississippi Rules of Court. SO ORDERED, this the
__

ALL JUSTICES AGREE. MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, CHIEF JUSTICE FORTHE COURTEXHIBIT A RULE 1. SCOPE OF RULES Theserules governprocedure inthe circuit courts, chancery courts, and countycourts in .all suits ofa civil nature, whether cognizable as cases at law or in equity, subjectto certain limitations enumerated in Rule 81; however, even those enumerated proceedings are still subject to these rules where no statute applicable to the proceedings provides otherwise or sets forth procedures inconsistent with these rules. These rules shall be construed
.. administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination ofevery action. [Amended effective July 1, 2020.] Advisory Committee Historical Note Effective July 1, 2020, Rule 1 was amended to emphasize that the parties share responsibility with the court to employ the rules so as to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive resolution ofevery action. XX So. 3d XX (Miss. ). Advisory Committee Notes These rules are to be applied as liberally to civil actions as is judicially feasible, whether in actions at law or in equity. However, nothing in the rules should be interpreted as abridging or modifying the traditional separations of jurisdiction between the law courts and equity courts in Mississippi. The salient provision ofRule 1 is the statementthat "These rules shall be construed
.. administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination ofevery action." There probably is no provision in these rules more importantthanthis mandate; itreflects the spiritinwhichtherules were conceived and written and in which they should be interpreted. The primary purpose ofprocedural rules is to promote the ends ofjustice; these rules reflect the view that this goal can best be accomplished by the establishment of a single form of action, known as a "civil action," thereby uniting the procedures in law and equity through a simplified procedure that minimizes technicalities and places considerable discretion in the trialjudge for construing the rules in a manner that will secure their objectives. [Advisory CommitteeNote adopted effective July 1, 2014: amended effective July 1, 2020.]

2
30.602 Materiality. ( a ) In determining materiality, the CFAO shall use the criteria in 48 CFR 9903.305.
( b ) A CFAO determination of materiality— ( 1 ) May be made before or after a general dollar magnitude proposal has been submitted, depending on the particular facts and circumstances; and
( 2 ) Shall be based on adequate documentation.
( c ) When the CFAO determines the cost impact is immaterial, the CFAO shall— ( 1 ) Make no contract adjustments and conclude the cost impact process;
( 2 ) Document the rationale for the determination; and
( 3 ) In the case of noncompliance issues, inform the contractor that— ( i ) The noncompliance should be corrected; and
( ii ) If the noncompliance is not corrected, the Government reserves the right to make appropriate contract adjustments should the cost impact become material in the future.
( d ) For required, unilateral, and desirable changes, and CAS noncompliances, when the amount involved is material, the CFAO shall follow the applicable provisions in 30.603, 30.604, 30.605, and 30.606.
[70 FR 11753, Mar. 9, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 10967, Feb. 28, 2008; 85 FR 67615, Oct. 23, 2020]
223.370-1 Scope. ( a ) This section applies to all acquisitions involving the use of ammunition and explosives, including acquisitions for— ( 1 ) Development;
( 2 ) Testing;
( 3 ) Research;
( 4 ) Manufacturing;
( 5 ) Handling or loading;
( 6 ) Assembling;
( 7 ) Packaging;
( 8 ) Storage;
( 9 ) Transportation;
( 10 ) Renovation;
( 11 ) Demilitarization;
( 12 ) Modification;
( 13 ) Repair;
( 14 ) Disposal;
( 15 ) Inspection; or
( 16 ) Any other use, including acquisitions requiring the use or the incorporation of materials listed in paragraph (b) of this subsection for initiation, propulsion, or detonation as an integral or component part of an explosive, an ammunition, or explosive end item or weapon system.
( b ) This section does not apply to acquisitions solely for— ( 1 ) Inert components containing no explosives, propellants, or pyrotechnics;
( 2 ) Flammable liquids;
( 3 ) Acids;
( 4 ) Oxidizers;
( 5 ) Powdered metals; or
( 6 ) Other materials having fire or explosive characteristics.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                             |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                             | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of English Language Acquisition Home |
|                                             |

**Legislation:** Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended, Title III, Sec. 3131; 20 U.S.C. 6821.

**Regulations:**EDGAR: 34 CFR 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 97, 98, and 99.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### Hiram O. Weller *vs.*George H. Hammer.

April 25, 1890.

Judgment by Default — Successive Motions for Belief on Same Grounds. Where no new facts have arisen, a motion cannot be renewed without leave, nor successive motions made for relief which might properly be included in the first motion.

Same — Order Denying Motion — Beview on Appeal. — An order denying a motion for leave to answer after default will not be reviewed on appeal, except for abuse of discretion.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, *Brill,*J., presiding, denying his motion to set aside a judgment of $348.12, entered on failure to answer, and for leave to serve an answer.

*Chapin & Sauer,*for appellant.

*John L. Townley,*for respondent.

Vanderburgh, J.

The defendant, after the plaintiff had taken judgment as upon default, moved the court to set aside the judgment, *196upon affidavits showing that the plaintiff had agreed to extend the time for answering, and that an answer had been served in time. This motion was denied, it appearing, among other things, that there was no written stipulation, and no legal service of an answer. The present motion was made to set aside the judgment, and for leave to-answer, upon substantially the same facts, except that the affidavit, shows that defendant’s counsel “understood” plaintiff’s attorney to-grant such further time to answer. This motion was also denied.

1. Upon the record, there^, was no abuse of discretion in refusing, the relief asked.

2. The defendant should have asked the additional relief on the-first motion, or obtained leave to renew the motion, no new facts having arisen.

Order affirmed.
# C_2017071EN.01000102.xml

| 7.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8390 — PSPIB/TIAA/Vantage)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 71/02)

On 1 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8390. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8390. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 2919.201 General policy.

The management of small and disadvantaged business utilization programs at DOL is the responsibility of the Program Manager of the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU), within the OSPE. All DOL acquisition officials are responsible for providing opportunities to small businesses and small disadvantaged businesses in DOL acquisitions, in compliance with law, directives, and the FAR. Further information can be found at the OSDBU website, currently accessible at *https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/office-of-the-senior-procurement-executive/office-of-small-and-disadvantaged-business-utilization,* or a successor website.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 34. The dense slippersnail (Crepidula) shell bed       on the bottom at station E16 off the tip of the seaward extension of       Middle Flats. Note growth on the shells. Station location is shown in figures 15 and 29. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig34.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:09:31 EDT
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 21, 2016

No. 04-15-00676-CV

Jose GEORGE, Matilde George, and Elaine George,

Appellants

v.

COMPASS BANK,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-03773

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Appellants' unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to October 14, 2016.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a) Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-86189) of Wyndham International, Inc., and (b)
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-82325) of Wyndham
International, Inc., and (c) Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-
40922) of Wyndham International, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Wyndham International, Inc.
as of December 31, 1998 and for the period then ended included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.



                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 26, 2001
Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed January 29, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00956-CV

NO. 14-18-01005-CV

____________

LOWELL VERMILLION, Appellant

V.

EPIC LIFT SYSTEMS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-63586

ABATEMENT ORDER

The parties filed a joint motion for a “thirty-day extension of all deadlines, 

including the current deadline for Appellant’s brief” in these appeals. The motion 

states the parties are in “good-faith settlement negotiations,” and they expect any 

resolution of the matter to occur within the next 30 days. 

We GRANT the parties’ motion to extend and, on our own motion, we 

ABATE these appeals. The appeals are abated, treated as closed cases, and removed 
2

from this court’s active docket until April 1, 2019. The appeals will be reinstated on 

this court’s active docket at that time, or when a motion to reinstate or motion to 

dismiss the appeals is filed. The court may reinstate the appeals on its own motion.

If the appeal is not dismissed, appellant’s brief in each appeal will be due 20 

days after that appeal is reinstated.

PER CURIAM
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Joseph Welch. (B) The People of the State of New York v. William Sanders. (C) The People of the State of New York v. Peter James Barry. (D) The People of the State of New York v. John Jones. (E) The People of the State of New York v. George Hill. (F) The People of the State of New York v. George Herbert.

Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.— [In each action] Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein.