alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2
[BIOGEN LETTERHEAD]

                                                     September 11, 1998


Sir Kenneth Murray
4 Mortonhall Road
Edinburgh EH9 2HW
Scotland, United Kingdom

Re: RENEWAL OF INDEPENDENT CONSULTING AND PROJECT AGREEMENT

Dear Ken:

         Your Independent Consulting and Project Agreement with Biogen, Inc.,
dated June 29, 1979, as previously amended (the "Agreement"), under which you
serve as a member of the Scientific Board of the Company expires on September
30, 1998. Biogen greatly values your input on the Scientific Board, and would
like to renew the Agreement for an additional three-year period commencing as of
September 30, 1998 and ending on September 30, 2001. The terms and conditions of
the Agreement will continue to apply during the renewal term except that
compensation for your services under the Agreement during the renewal term will
be as follows:

         1.  You will receive (i) a $20,000 per year retainer, (ii) $2,000 per
             day for attendance at Scientific Board meetings, plus reasonable
             travel and lodging expenses and (iii) $500 per day for time spent
             in Biogen=s laboratories.

         2.  Subject to approval by the Stock and Option Plan Administration
             Committee, on your renewal date, you will be granted an option to
             purchase 30,000 shares of Biogen Common Stock. The option will vest
             over three years (33-1/3% per year) and will be exercisable at a
             price equal to the average of the high and low sales prices on your
             renewal date.

         If you agree to renewal of the Agreement on these terms, please sign
both copies of this renewal letter and return one copy to the attention of Anne
Marie Cook, Associate General Counsel, Biogen, Inc., 14 Cambridge Center,
Cambridge, MA 02142.


<PAGE>   2



         We look forward to your continued participation on the Scientific
Board.


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        BIOGEN, INC.


                                        By:________________________________
                                           James R. Tobin
                                           President and Chief Executive
                                           Officer


                                        By:________________________________
                                           Phillip A. Sharp, Ph.D.
                                           Chairman of Scientific Board



                                        AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:


                                        ___________________________________
                                        Sir Kenneth Murray, Ph.D.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 105 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 105

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 2, 2024

 Ms. Omar submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a license 
to export with respect to the following proposed export to the United 
Arab Emirates is hereby prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 23-52, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)): eighteen (18) AN/TPQ-50 
        Radar Systems--man-portable version. Also included are 107mm 
        High Explosive (HE) rockets (for CONUS testing only); Computer 
        Digital Military Laptop Radar Control Display units; 5kW 
        Advanced Medium Mobile Power Source (AMMPS) Trailer-Mounted, 
        Diesel Engine Driven Power Unit PU-2001; spares; mission 
        equipment; communication and navigation equipment; support 
        equipment; repair parts; special tools and test equipment; 
        technical data and publications; site survey; United States 
        Government and contractor technical and logistics personnel 
        services; and other related elements of logistics and program 
        support.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000714909
<NAME> 82I.TXT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          83,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,476
<PP&E>                                      10,409,464
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,970,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,585,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,535,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,585,711
<SALES>                                        613,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               621,278
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  587,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,081
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### William B. Wilson *vs.*Northern Pacific Railroad Company.

June 20, 1890.

Kailway — Fire Set by Engine — Evidence—Statutory Presumption.— Evidence considered, and *held*sufficient to warrant the court in submitting to the jury the question whether the Are which destroyed plaintiff’s buildings was set by sparks from defendant’s locomotive engine. And *held,*also, that the statutory presumption of defendant’s negligence was not so clearly and conclusively rebutted by the evidence in the case as to justify this court in reversing the decision of the trial court.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Anoka county, *Smith,*J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $471 for plaintiff.

*Jno. C. Bullitt, Jr.,*and *Tilden R. Selmes,*for appellant.

*Everett Hammons,*for respondent.

Vanderburgh, J.

1. There was evidence for the jury to consider upon the first branch of the ease, tending to show that the fire which caused the damage complained of was set by defendant’s engine. It shows that the fire caught in the dry grass about 60 feet south or southwest of the defendant’s track, in the direction of plaintiff’s premises, and was observed soon after the train passed. There was a very high wind blowing at the time, and the fire spread very rapidly to plaintiff’s stacks and buildings, some of which were destroyed. The fire when discovered is represented by one of the witnesses to have been a small blaze only. Another witness testified that the engine scattered fire from its ash-pan. A train had passed on the Manitoba road, adjoining the track of the plaintiff, from 20 to 30 minutes previous to the passage of the defendant’s train. It was a question for the jury to determine as to the probability of the fire having been caused by the defendant’s engine.

2. Nor was the evidence offered by the defendant to rebut the statutory presumption of negligence so full, specific, and complete in all respects as to authorize this court to hold that it was conclusively shown that the engine was in suitable repair, and managed with due care and skill. The train was running at the rate of 35 miles an *520hour, the wind was strong, the ground was very dry, and the danger of setting fires very great at that season. Neither the engineer nor fireman had any knowledge of the fire, and they have no particular recollection of the circumstances of that trip. They are only able to testify, generally, in respect to the condition and management of the engine. One of plaintiff’s witnesses swears he saw that the engine scattered fire as it passed along, or fire dropping from the engine '‘from underneath,” which defendant’s witnesses claim was hardly possible if the back damper was kept closed, which was necessary for safety. We are not able to say that it clearly appears, in view of the circumstances, that the care used was commensurate with the danger reasonably to be 'apprehended, or that the verdict is wholly without support. *Nichols*v. *Chicago, St. Paul, M. & O. Ry. Co.,*36 Minn. 452, (32 N. W. Rep. 176;) *Grand Trunk R. Co.*v. *Richardson,*91 U. S. 454, 469.

Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Chattem,
Inc.'s unaudited financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                       850
<INVENTORY>                                     23,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,709
<PP&E>                                          50,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 482,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,167
<BONDS>                                        345,630
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,927
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   482,070
<SALES>                                        215,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,260
<CGS>                                           57,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,119
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,141
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (110)
<CHANGES>                                        (542)
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,326
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49


</TABLE>
#### 2822.1503 Procedures for acquiring end products on the List of Products Requiring Contractor Certification as to Forced or Indentured Child Labor.

The contracting officer shall refer to the DOJ Inspector General for investigation, under FAR 22.1503(e), any matters relating to that section.
#### 228.311-1 Contract clause.

Use the clause at FAR 52.228-7, Insurance—Liability to Third Persons, in solicitations and contracts, other than those for construction and those for architect-engineer services, when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated, unless the head of the contracting activity waives the requirement for use of the clause.

[56 FR 36404, July 31, 1991. Redesignated at 61 FR 50454, Sept. 26, 1996]
Exhibit 32.8


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                        OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                        AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING COMPANY
                         (required by Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended March
31, 2004 of Ameren Energy  Generating  Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Form  10-Q"),  I,
Warner L. Baxter, chief financial officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Form 10-Q fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 10, 2004



                                       /s/ Warner L. Baxter
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Warner L. Baxter
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2017412EN.01000203.xml

| 4.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/2

---

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 193 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court

(2017/C 412/04)

At its General Meeting on 26 September 2017, the Court designated the Second Chamber as the Chamber that is, in accordance with Article 11(2) of the Rules of Procedure, responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 193 of those Rules, for the period from 7 October 2017 to 6 October 2018.

---
208.7005 Military interdepartmental purchase requests. Follow the procedures at— ( a ) PGI 253.208-1 when using DD Form 448, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request; and
( b ) PGI 253.208-2 when using DD Form 448-2, Acceptance of MIPR.
[71 FR 39005, July 11, 2006]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                         CHATTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     FEBRUARY 28,
                                              --------------------------
                                                    1998     1997
                                                   ------   ------                                                           
<S>                                                <C>      <C>   
NET INCOME .....................................   $  609   $  136
                                                   ------   ------
                                                   ------   ------
COMMON SHARES:
    Weighted average number outstanding ........    9,087    8,603
    Number issued upon assumed exercise of
    outstanding stock options and stock
      warrants .................................      404      204
                                                   ------   ------
     Weighted average number of common and common
      equivalent shares outstanding ............    9,491    8,807
                                                   ------   ------
                                                   ------   ------ 
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE:
    Basic ......................................   $  .07   $  .02
                                                   ------   ------
                                                   ------   ------
    Diluted ....................................   $  .06   $  .02
                                                   ------   ------
                                                   ------   ------

</TABLE>
#### 3.1001 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Subcontract* means any contract entered into by a subcontractor to furnish supplies or services for performance of a prime contract or a subcontract.

*Subcontractor* means any supplier, distributor, vendor, or firm that furnished supplies or services to or for a prime contractor or another subcontractor.

*United States* means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.

[73 FR 67090, Nov. 12, 2008]
#### 22.1600 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures to implement Executive Order 13496, dated January 30, 2009 (74 FR 6107, February 4, 2009).
#### 311.7000 Defining electronic and information technology requirements.

The contracting officer shall ensure that requiring activities specify agency needs for electronic and information technology (EIT) supplies and services, and document market research, document EIT requirements, and identify the applicable Section 508 accessibility standards. See FAR 11.002(f) and HHSAR subpart 339.2.
# C_2018133EN.01001901.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/19

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 133/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : The Republic of San Marino

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 500th anniversary of the birth of Tintoretto

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The centre of the coin depicts a detail from Tintoretto’s painting ‘The Visitation’ (the embrace between the Virgin Mary and Elizabeth), and the dates ‘1518-2018’; at the edge: ‘SAN MARINO’ written above, and ‘Tintoretto’ below; on the left are the initials of the artist Luciana de Simoni ‘LDS’ and the letter ‘R’ identifying the Mint of Rome.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : April 2018

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Amendment No. 2 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Flow International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), for the year ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN R.
LIGHT                                    
|Stephen R. Light Principal Executive Officer March 29, 2007
#### 3409.502 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all ED contracts except contracts with other Federal agencies. However, this subpart applies to contracts with the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the 8(a) program.