alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
On  October 31, 2013, OCR reached agreement with the State University of New York  (SUNY) in OCR’s compliance review of SUNY’s handling of allegations and reports  of sexual assault and harassment at its 29 state-operated campuses.  SUNY  agreed that it and each of its 29 state-operated campuses will initiate or  continue to provide notice of nondiscrimination and have a designated Title IX  Coordinator at SUNY and at each of the campuses; conduct Title IX complaint  investigations promptly instead of waiting for the conclusion of criminal  investigations (SUNY may temporarily suspend its Title IX fact finding while a  law enforcement agency is gathering its evidence); provide interim relief for  the complainant, if needed; review annually all sex discrimination complaints  and take action to address any patterns or systemic problems identified; ensure  that grievance procedures comply with Title IX requirements; ensure students  and staff are aware of Title IX’s prohibition against sex discrimination, how  to recognize it when it occurs, and how to report incidents; seek input from  the campus community, including from past complainants, and conduct periodic  assessments of the campus climate in order to evaluate and improve the  effectiveness of the campus’s implementation of its sexual harassment policies  and procedures and to inform its future proactive steps to provide a safe  environment for students free of sexual harassment and sexual violence. In addition,  each of the individual campuses visited by OCR will reexamine all sexual  harassment/violence complaints filed during and since academic year  2011-2012.  SUNY must report to OCR the  actions it will take to correct problems identified in the manner in which  these four campuses handled those complaints, which may include providing  individual remedies for students. 

***Read  the Press Release | Read    the Resolution Letter*****MS Word** (196K)    | ***Read the Resolution Agreement*****MS Word** (85K)

 

Top
(June 21, 1962)

#### Bert Eisenberg, Appellant, v. 230 Kent Corporation, Respondent. 230 Kent Corporation, Respondent, v. Bert Eisenberg, Appellant.

Motion by appellant (tenant) for a stay of trial pending appeal, denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD

- 1088

- 20

HOLLY LEANN ELLIOT T , App ellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE TWEL F TH COURT OF APPEALS

SMITH COUNTY

Y EARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion in which S LAUGHTER , J., joined

.

DISSENTING OPINION

For the reasons set out in my dissenting opinion in Dulin v. State , ___ S.W.3d ___,

No s . PD

- 0856

- 19 & PD

- 1857

- 19 , 2021 WL 1202400 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021), I

respectfully dissent to the Court’s disposition of the State’s petition for discretionary

review.

FIL ED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
New Call for Reviewers for the FY 2024 PPOHA Grant Competition!

If you are interested in serving as a Peer Reviewer, please contact Margarita L. Meléndez, and be sure you are registered as a Peer Reviewer in the G5 system.

The FY 2024 Notice Inviting Applications is now available in the Federal Register. Application deadline is 5/13/24. Click here for Pre-application webinar schedule.

**Program Office:**Institutional Service

**CFDA Number:** 84.031M**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants**Also Known As:** PPOHA; Title V Part B**Program Contact:**

**Stacey A. Slijepcevic, Ph.D.**Director, Hispanic-Serving Institutions Division (Phone) 202-453-6150 | stacey.slijepcevic@ed.gov

**Margarita L. Meléndez**Program Lead, PPOHA Program(Phone) 202-260-3548 | margarita.melendez@ed.gov

## Program Description

The Promoting Postbaccalaureate Opportunities for Hispanic Americans (PPOHA) Program provides grants to: (1) expand postbaccalaureate educational opportunities for, and improve the academic attainment of, Hispanic students; and (2) expand the postbaccalaureate academic offerings as well as enhance the program quality in the institutions of higher education that are educating the majority of Hispanic college students and helping large numbers of Hispanic and low-income students complete postsecondary degrees.

## Applicant Information and Eligibility

In order to receive a grant under the PPOHA program, an institution of higher education must offer a postbaccalaureate certificate or postbaccalaureate program.

Institutions must be designated as an eligible institution of higher education in order to apply for the Title V, Part B program, and must meet the program specific requirements to be defined as an HSI.

To be designated as an eligible institution of higher education, an institution must apply for and receive designation through an application process.  Please refer to the most recent Application for Designation as an Eligible Institution. You may contact the program office if you have questions regarding eligibility.
# C_2019280EN.01000101.xml

| 19.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 280/01)

Last publication

OJ C 270, 12.8.2019

Past publications

OJ C 263, 5.8.2019

OJ C 255, 29.7.2019

OJ C 246, 22.7.2019

OJ C 238, 15.7.2019

OJ C 230, 8.7.2019

OJ C 220, 1.7.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 123 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk 

Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Safer Communities 

by Chemical Accident Prevention’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2024 

Mr. CRENSHAW (for himself, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. PFLUGER, Mr. CARTER

of Georgia, Mr. PENCE, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. 

JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. LATTA, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. 

CURTIS, Mr. FULCHER, Mr. BABIN, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. GRIFFITH, 

Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BILIRAKIS, and Mr. PALMER) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Safer Communities by Chemical Accident Prevention’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the AdVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:29 Mar 29, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ123.IH HJ123

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 123 IH 

1 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency relat2 ing to ‘‘Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk 

3 Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Safer 

4 Communities by Chemical Accident Prevention’’ (89 Fed. 

5 Reg. 17622 (March 11, 2024)), and such rule shall have 

6 no force or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### 32.702 Policy.

No officer or employee of the Government may create or authorize an obligation in excess of the funds available, or in advance of appropriations (Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341), unless otherwise authorized by law. Before executing any contract, the contracting officer shall (a) obtain written assurance from responsible fiscal authority that adequate funds are available or (b) expressly condition the contract upon availability of funds in accordance with 32.703-2.

[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 2665, Jan. 17, 1986]
Case: 1:12-cv-05088 Document #: 14 Filed: 10/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:149
3.903 Policy. ( a ) ( 1 ) Contractors and subcontractors are prohibited from discharging, demoting, or otherwise discriminating against an employee as a reprisal for disclosing, to any of the entities listed at paragraph (b) of this section, information that the employee reasonably believes is— ( i ) Evidence of gross mismanagement of a Federal contract;
( ii ) A gross waste of Federal funds;
( iii ) An abuse of authority relating to a Federal contract;
( iv ) A substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or
( v ) A violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract).
( 2 ) A reprisal is prohibited even if it is undertaken at the request of an executive branch official, unless the request takes the form of a non-discretionary directive and is within the authority of the executive branch official making the request.
( b ) Disclosure may be made to the following entities: ( 1 ) A Member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress.
( 2 ) An Inspector General.
( 3 ) The Government Accountability Office.
( 4 ) A Federal employee responsible for contract oversight or management at the relevant agency.
( 5 ) An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency.
( 6 ) A court or grand jury.
( 7 ) A management official or other employee of the contractor or subcontractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct.
( c ) An employee who initiates or provides evidence of contractor or subcontractor misconduct in any judicial or administrative proceeding relating to waste, fraud, or abuse on a Federal contract shall be deemed to have made a disclosure.
[88 FR 69520, Oct. 5, 2023]
32.603 Debt determination. ( a ) If the contracting officer has any indication that a contractor owes money to the Government under a contract, the contracting officer shall determine promptly whether an actual debt is due and the amount. Any unnecessary delay may contribute to— ( 1 ) Loss of timely availability of the funds to the program for which the funds were initially provided;
( 2 ) Increased difficulty in collecting the debt; or
( 3 ) Actual monetary loss to the Government.
( b ) The amount of indebtedness determined by the contracting officer shall be an amount that— ( 1 ) Is based on the merits of the case; and
( 2 ) Is consistent with the contract terms.
# C_2019196EN.01000301.xml

| 12.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 June 2019

(2019/C 196/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1320 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4687 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89085 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6828 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1233 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 140,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7700 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,640 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 320,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2678 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7252 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,5752 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6273 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5002 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8700 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7206 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5446 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7140 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8243 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4140 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 116,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7123 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,810 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,0227 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,403 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3893 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6783 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,6155 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1320

JPY

Japanese yen

123,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4687

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89085

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6828

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1233

ISK

Iceland króna

140,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7700

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,640

HUF

Hungarian forint

320,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2678

RON

Romanian leu

4,7252

TRY

Turkish lira

6,5752

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6273

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5002

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8700

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7206

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5446

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,48

ZAR

South African rand

16,7140

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8243

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4140

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 116,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7123

PHP

Philippine peso

58,810

RUB

Russian rouble

73,0227

THB

Thai baht

35,403

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3893

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6783

INR

Indian rupee

78,6155

---

(1)  
  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
First Department

(March 17, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York v. Michael Pat Brady.

Motion granted to the extent of directing the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, to furnish to appellant’s counsel a copy of the transcript of the hearing on the motion to suppress. The court construes section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to require the Clerk of the court and the stenographer to cause the stenographic minutes of the hearing on the motion to suppress to be transcribed and filed as part of “ the stenographic minutes of the entire proceedings of the trial” even where the motion to suppress is heard and decided prior to the trial on the indictment since the appeal from the judgment of conviction after trial brings up for review the order denying a motion to suppress. The time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the June 1964 Term of this court. (See, also, *People*v. *Cook,*21 A D 2d 979.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Section 777(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended   20 USC 1140q(b)

## Regulations

                - There are no program-specific regulations for this program.
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.

## Guidance

                - Fact Sheets:
                Highlights of the Final Rule to Amend the Department of Justice’s Regulation Implementing Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Highlights of the Final Rule to Amend the Department of Justice’s Regulation Implementing Title III of the ADA

                - Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, including changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008

Institutional Service Home

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
3003.502-2 Subcontractor kickbacks. ( g ) The DHS OIG shall receive the prime contractor or subcontractors written report.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 271 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community Gardening Awareness 

Week. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 

Ms. DUCKWORTH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community 

Gardening Awareness Week. 

Whereas countless families in the United States live with 

hunger every day and do not have access to fresh produce 

in their neighborhoods; 

Whereas community gardens conserve limited resources and 

promote sustainability; 

Whereas community gardens provide an important and nutritious source of fresh produce donations for local food 

pantries and social service agencies; 

Whereas community gardens enable individuals to gain control over the quality, variety, and cost of their food supply; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 271 IS 

Whereas community gardening encourages individuals of diverse cultural and economic backgrounds to work together, foster a better sense of community, and improve 

the quality of their lives; 

Whereas community-based youth and school gardening programs encourage personal self-esteem and healthy attitudes toward learning; 

Whereas community gardening and greening projects provide 

a catalyst for neighborhood and community development; 

Whereas community gardens reduce city heat and preserve 

open spaces for present and future generations; 

Whereas community gardens and other green spaces— 

(1) provide a more livable environment in municipalities throughout the United States; and 

(2) present a positive local image to the residents of, 

and visitors to, a community; 

Whereas community gardens help provide local food banks 

with fresh produce for individuals in need; and 

Whereas the last week of September 2017 is an appropriate 

week to designate as ‘‘National Community Gardening 

Awareness Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and 

2 ideals of National Community Gardening Awareness 

3 Week, including— 

4 (1) raising awareness of the importance of com5 munity gardens and urban agriculture; 

6 (2) improving access to public land for the de7 velopment of sustainable food projects; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 271 IS 

1 (3) encouraging further growth of community 

2 gardens and other opportunities that increase food 

3 self-reliance, improve fitness, contribute to a cleaner 

4 environment, and enhance community development; 

5 and 

6 (4) supporting cooperative efforts among Fed7 eral, State, and local governments and nonprofit or8 ganizations— 

9 (A) to promote the development and ex10 pansion of community gardens; and 

11 (B) to increase the accessibility of commu12 nity gardens to disadvantaged population 

13 groups. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009

Limerick Braidwood (1)

D11 39:10 69:44 26:33 1A 94:48 87:57 76:47

D12 68:36 39:50 62:33 1B 78:05 101:43 89:26

D13 38:24 81:18 27:54 2A 88:08 93:58 103:17

D14 35:16 96:04 33:42 2B 89:10 89:27 112:21

D21 74:32 34:28 45:43

D22 74:16 37:54 83:32 Byron (1)

D23 38:21 106:20 38:12

D24 62:46 57:16 48:19 1A 62:56 91:09 52:57

1B 76:08 62:54 75:14

2A 102:52 72:20 63:41

Peach Bottom 2B 115:02 63:48 64:32

E1 81:18 57:53 71:34 Clinton

E2 62:19 53:21 49:42

E3 50:59 47:17 76:05 Div 1 45:50 35:35 25:53

E4 68:17 48:52 51:30 Div 2 51:22 33:18 47:52

Div 3 49:42 28:09 28:59

Oyster Creek Dresden (1), (2)

DG1 51:24 45:53 83:30 Unit 2 NA 20:06 45:16

DG2 49:07 55:23 53:09 Unit 3 NA 27:40 38:21

Unit 2/3 NA 23:58 41:53

TMI SBO 2 NA 34:02 8:31

SBO 3 NA 49:03 8:19

EG-Y-1A 23:06 32:48 14:54

EG-Y-1B 31:18 25:06 19:54 LaSalle

EG-Y-4 5:12 5:12 6:36

 0 DG 50:48 24:30 24:42

1A DG 46:30 27:48 42:36

1B DG 59:24 35:12 51:36

Notes: 2A DG 45:48 20:48 19:18

2B DG 43:18 23:12 26:10

(1) 2009 Data through September

Quad Cities (1)

 2009 Data Unofficial

Unit 1 67:06 33:44 52:36

Unit 2 37:34 62:58 23:48

Unit 1/2 68:57 52:16 63:48

SBO 1 15:17 52:24 10:51

SBO 2 52:39 22:00 36:36

(2) Dresden 2007 Data Not Provided; 

East West

Exelon Nuclear Standby Diesel Generator Run Hours (Hours:Minutes) 

2007 through 10/2009 (except as noted)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 133 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 133

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for 
                     Heavy-Duty Vehicles-Phase 3''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2024

 Mr. Fulcher (for himself, Mr. Nehls, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. 
 Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Walberg, 
 Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Wenstrup, 
Mr. Perry, Mr. Meuser, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Carey, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, 
 Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas, Mr. 
Reschenthaler, Mr. Bost, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Babin, Mr. 
  Crawford, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Austin Scott of 
Georgia, Mr. Burchett, Ms. Stefanik, Ms. Boebert, Mr. Bean of Florida, 
    Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Dunn of 
Florida, Mr. Collins, Mr. Obernolte, and Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for 
                     Heavy-Duty Vehicles-Phase 3''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles--Phase 3'' 
(89 Fed. Reg. 29440 (April 22, 2024)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.
                                 <all>
```