alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.(b)


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
on Form N-4  (File Nos. 333-113070 and
811-8108) of our report dated March 30, 2009 relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in Protective Life Insurance
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008 and is included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File Nos. 333-113070 and 811-8108).  We also consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 of our report dated April 24,
2009, relating to the financial statements of The Protective Variable Annuity
Separate Account, which is included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to
the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File Nos. 333-113070 and
811-8108).


 


 





PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP 

Birmingham, AL


October 28,
2009
#### 3052.235-70 Dissemination of information—educational institutions.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3035.70-2, insert the following clause:

# Dissemination of Information—Educational Institutions (DEC 2003)

(a) The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) desires widespread dissemination of the results of funded non-sensitive research. The Contractor, therefore, may publish (subject to the provisions of the “Data Rights” and “Patent Rights” clauses of the contract) research results in professional journals, books, trade publications, or other appropriate media (a thesis or collection of theses should not be used to distribute results because dissemination will not be sufficiently widespread). All costs of publication pursuant to this clause shall be borne by the Contractor and shall not be charged to the Government under this or any other Federal contract.

(b) Any copy of material published under this clause shall contain acknowledgment of DHS's sponsorship of the research effort and a disclaimer stating that the published material represents the position of the author(s) and not necessarily that of DHS. Articles for publication or papers to be presented to professional societies do not require the authorization of the Contracting Officer prior to release. However, a printed or electronic copy of each article shall be transmitted to the Contracting Officer at least two weeks prior to release or publication.

(c) Publication under the terms of this clause does not release the Contractor from the obligation of preparing and submitting to the Contracting Officer a final report containing the findings and results of research, as set forth in the schedule of the contract.

(End of clause)

[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003. Redesignated and amended at 71 FR 25775, May 2, 2006; 77 FR 50637, Aug. 22, 2012]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-16325) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan of ACR Group, Inc.,
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-42701) pertaining to the
registration of 2,411,667 shares of common stock of ACR Group, Inc., and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-51546) for the registration of
1,000,000 common shares pertaining to the ACR Group, Inc. 401(k) plan of our
report dated May 11, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of ACR Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended February 28, 2001.



                                    ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Houston, Texas
May 29, 2001
239.101 Policy. ( 1 ) A contracting officer may not enter into a contract in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold for information technology products or services that are not commercial products or commercial services unless the head of the contracting activity determines in writing that no commercial items are suitable to meet the agency's needs, as determined through the use of market research appropriate to the circumstances (see FAR 10.001(a)(3)) (section 855 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Pub. L. 114-92)).
( 2 ) See subpart 208.74 when acquiring commercial software or software maintenance.
( 3 ) See 227.7202 for policy on the acquisition of commercial computer software and commercial computer software documentation.
( 4 ) See 227.7203 for policy on the acquisition of other than commercial computer software and other than commercial computer software documentation.
[83 FR 4445, Jan. 31, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 6588, Jan. 31, 2023; 88 FR 17345, Mar. 22, 2023]
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      June 10, 2009 | /S/ JAMES P. FOGARTY          |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                      | James      P. Fogarty         |
|                      | President                     |
|                      | Chief      Executive Officer  |
|                      |                          |
| Dated:      June 10, 2009 | /S/ ERIC M. SPECTER           |
|                      | Eric      M. Specter          |
|                      | Executive      Vice President |
|                      | Chief      Financial Officer  |
Order entered April 2 5 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01390
- CR ERNESTO JENNINGS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11
- 31021
- W



### O RDER Appellant’s April 19, 2016 second motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is
DENIED

. We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the tria l court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, t he trial court isORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings an d recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
# C_2018297EN.01000301.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

22 August 2018

(2018/C 297/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1616 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4588 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89928 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5075 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1401 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 124,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6808 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,725 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,94 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2821 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6485 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,0071 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5785 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5126 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1184 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7319 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5860 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 298,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,5803 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9470 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4295 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 936,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7655 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,028 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 78,9307 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,019 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,6912 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8821 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,1900 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1616

JPY

Japanese yen

128,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4588

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89928

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5075

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1401

ISK

Iceland króna

124,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6808

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,725

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,94

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2821

RON

Romanian leu

4,6485

TRY

Turkish lira

7,0071

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5785

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5126

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1184

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7319

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5860

KRW

South Korean won

1 298,95

ZAR

South African rand

16,5803

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9470

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4295

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 936,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7655

PHP

Philippine peso

62,028

RUB

Russian rouble

78,9307

THB

Thai baht

38,019

BRL

Brazilian real

4,6912

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8821

INR

Indian rupee

81,1900

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
2509.406-3 Procedures. ( a ) Any NSF employee who becomes aware of circumstances that may serve as the basis for debarment of a contractor will promptly report them to the NSF Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the debarring official. OIG will investigate the circumstances and, if it determines appropriate, prepare a written referral of the matter to the debarring official.
( b ) Upon receipt of a referral from the NSF Office of Inspector General, the debarring official will determine, in consultation as appropriate with OIG, the NSF Office of the General Counsel, the NSF Procurement Executive, and program officials, what additional steps are necessary and appropriate to make a decision in accordance with the requirements of 48 CFR 9.406-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Kevin J. Reinhart,  Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of
Nexen Inc.,  a Canadian  Corporation  (the  "Company")  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
       ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
       on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
       78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
       Company.



Date: July 21, 2010

                                                  /s/ Kevin J. Reinhart
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Kevin J. Reinhart
                                                  Executive Vice President
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       63
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ILLINOIS LIBERTY PAC, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) Judge Gary Feinerman

) 

v. ) No. 12 CV 5811

) 

LISA M. MADIGAN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE

Plaintiffs respond to Defendants’ motions in limine (Doc. 167) as follows. 

The Court should deny Defendants’ first motion in limine, which seeks to exclude 

Plaintiffs’ expert witness, Dr. Marcus Osborn, for all the reasons stated in the Court’s order 

denying Defendants’ previous motion to exclude Plaintiffs’ expert (Doc. 163) and in Plaintiffs’

response to Defendants’ previous motion (Doc. 119). Defendants have identified no grounds for 

the Court to reconsider its findings that Dr. Osborn is “eminently qualified” and that the methods 

he used in his analysis were “appropriate.” Doc. 163 at 10. 

Plaintiffs do not oppose Defendants’ second, third, and fourth motions in limine.

Dated: November 15, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jacob H. Huebert

Jacob H. Huebert 

Jeffrey M. Schwab 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER

190 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1500

Chicago, Illinois 60603

(312) 263-7668

jhuebert@libertyjusticecenter.org

jschwab@libertyjusticecenter.org

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 168 Filed: 11/13/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3470
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jacob H. Huebert, an attorney, hereby certify that on November 15, 2015, I served 

Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motions in Limine on Defendants’ counsel by filing it 

through the Court’s electronic case filing system. 

/s/ Jacob H. Huebert

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 168 Filed: 11/13/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3471
# C_2018352EN.01000101.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 352/01)

Last publication

OJ C 341, 24.9.2018

Past publications

OJ C 328, 17.9.2018

OJ C 319, 10.9.2018

OJ C 311, 3.9.2018

OJ C 301, 27.8.2018

OJ C 294, 20.8.2018

OJ C 285, 13.8.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 12.3

               SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (CONSOLIDATED)
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                   FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
                            (Thousands Except Ratio)
                                   (Unaudited)



     Operating Income                                 $144,513

     Adjustments
        Income taxes                                    44,325
        Provision for deferred income taxes             (7,846)
        Deferred investment tax credits                 (4,544)
        Other income and deductions                     (2,462)
        Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
             used during construction                    2,352
        Interest portion of financing leases               224
                                                    ------------

               Earnings                               $176,562
                                                    ============


     Fixed Charges:
        Interest on long-term debt                     $38,496
        Interest on short-term debt and other           14,942
        Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities      8,662
        Interest portion of financing leases               224
                                                    ------------

               Fixed Charges                           $62,324
                                                    ============


     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                2.83
                                                    ============



                                       76
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

                - Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1138-1138d; the Explanatory Statement accompanying Division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (Pub. L. 117-103). 

                - There are no program-specific regulations.
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) , 34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99
                - eCFR :: 2 CFR Part 200 -- Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
FIPSE Home
   Printable view  Last Modified: 10/28/2022How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity

 
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
- vote.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANEX-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SecureCARE
Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the SEC (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company



Name:  /s/ ROBERT WOODROW
       ---------------------------
       Robert Woodrow
Title: President, Chief Executive officer and Director
Date:  November 16, 2005


                                       22
# C_2016476EN.01000102.xml

| 20.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 476/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 476/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8272 — CVC/Cinven/NewDay)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 476/02)

On 14 December 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8272. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8272. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 3052.217-94 Lay days (USCG).

As prescribed in USCG guidance at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3017.9000(a) and (b), insert the following clause:

# Lay Days (DEC 2003)

(a) Lay day time will be paid by the Government at the Contractor's stipulated bid price for this item of the contract when the vessel remains on the dry dock or marine railway as a result of any change that involves work in addition to that required under the basic contract.

(b) No lay day time shall be paid until all items of the basic contract for which a price was established by the Contractor and for which docking of the vessel was required have been satisfactorily completed and accepted.

(c) Days of hauling out and floating, whatever the hour, shall not be paid as lay day time, and days when no work is performed by the Contractor shall not be paid as lay day time.

(d) Payment of lay day time shall constitute complete compensation for all costs, direct and indirect, to reimburse the Contractor for use of dry dock or marine railway.

(End of clause)