alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John S. Berg and another *vs.*A. J. Stanhope and another.

April 24, 1890.

Complaint against Two Defendants on Several Contracts. — A complaint which alleges no joint contract or promise by the defendants, but alleges the several contract or promise of each of two defendants, improperly ■ unites several causes of action. Following *Trowbridge*v. *Forepaugh,*14 Minn. 100, (133.)

Appeal by defendant Isaac Patterson from an order of the district court for Isanti county, *Hicks,*J., presiding,, overruling his separate demurrer to the complaint.

*J. A. Ross*and *J. L. Dobbin,*for appellant.

*H. F. Barker,*for respondents.

Gilfillan, C. J.1

Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint. One ground of demurrer was that several causes of *177action are improperly united. The complaint contains three counts, all alike so far as obnoxious to the above ground of demurrer. Each alleges a request by defendant Stanhope to do certain work, and a promise by him to pay for it, and a separate promise by defendant Patterson to pay for the same work. No joint employment or promise is alleged. In other words, a separate cause of action against each defendant, but no joint cause of action against both, is alleged-

The case comes within the decision in *Trowbridge*v. Forepaugh, 14 Minn. 100, (133,) in which it was held that the statute forbids thejoinder of causes of action which do not affect all the parties. The-liability of each defendant depends on the contract or promise of himself, to which the other was not a party, and by which he was notf affected.

Order reversed.

1

 Mitchell, J., was absent, and took no part in this decision.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Roger H. BallouRoger H. BallouPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 6, 2009



By:

/s/ Mark A. KerschnerMark A. KerschnerExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


Dated: August 6, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2016418EN.01000101.xml

| 12.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 November 2016

(2016/C 418/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0904 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86133 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8610 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0732 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1148 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,054 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,25 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4081 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5160 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,5471 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4338 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4711 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4593 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5163 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5359 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 270,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5073 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4198 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5130 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 616,81 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7342 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,473 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,4075 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,491 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7208 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,7062 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,3295 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0904

JPY

Japanese yen

115,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86133

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8610

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0732

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1148

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,054

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,25

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4081

RON

Romanian leu

4,5160

TRY

Turkish lira

3,5471

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4338

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4711

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4593

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5163

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5359

KRW

South Korean won

1 270,20

ZAR

South African rand

15,5073

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4198

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5130

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 616,81

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7342

PHP

Philippine peso

53,473

RUB

Russian rouble

71,4075

THB

Thai baht

38,491

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7208

MXN

Mexican peso

22,7062

INR

Indian rupee

73,3295

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
209.402 Policy. ( d ) The uniform suspension and debarment procedures to be followed by all debarring and suspending officials are set out in appendix H to this chapter.
( e ) The department or agency shall provide a copy of the Debarment and Suspension Procedures at DFARS appendix H to this chapter to contractors at the time of their suspension or when they are proposed for debarment, and upon request to other interested parties.
[59 FR 27668, May 27, 1994]
3052.101 Using part 3052. ( b ) Numbering. ( 2 ) ( i ) Provisions or clauses that supplement the FAR. ( A ) Agency-prescribed provisions and clauses permitted by HSAR and used on a standard basis (i.e., normally used in two or more solicitations or contracts regardless of contract type) shall be prescribed and contained in the HSAR. Component desiring to use a provision or a clause on a standard basis shall submit a request containing a copy of the clause(s), justification for its use, and evidence of legal counsel review to the CPO in accordance with (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.304 for possible inclusion in the HSAR.
( B ) Provisions and clauses used on a one-time basis (i.e., non-standard provisions and clauses) may be approved by the contracting officer, unless a higher level is designated by the Component. This authority is subject to: ( 1 ) Evidence of legal counsel review in the contract file;
( 2 ) Inserting these clauses in the appropriate sections of the uniform contract format; and
( 3 ) Ensuring the provisions and clauses do not deviate from the requirements of the FAR and HSAR.
Note to 3052.101 :
The solicitation provisions and contract clauses matrix referencing all HSAR provisions and clauses is available at *https://www.dhs.gov/publication/hsar-provision-and-clause-matrix*.
[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 48802, Aug. 22, 2006; 77 FR 50636, Aug. 22, 2012; 86 FR 17317, Apr. 2, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 68 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 68

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed export to the Government of 
            Egypt of certain defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2018

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the disapproval of the proposed export to the Government of 
            Egypt of certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a letter 
of offer with respect to any of the following proposed exports to the 
Government of Egypt (described in the certification Transmittal No. 18-
47, sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate pursuant 
to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2776(b)(1)) on November 28, 2018), is hereby prohibited:
            (1) The proposed sale of 46,000 120MM Target Practice--
        Tracer (M831A1) and 120MM Target Practice, Cone Stabilized, 
        Discarding Sabot--(M865) rounds (Transmittal Numbered 18-47).
            (2) The proposed sale of 10,000 120MM 4th-Generation 
        Kinetic Energy-Tungsten (KE-W) A4 Armor-Piercing Fin-Stabilized 
        Discarding Sabot with Tracer (APFSDS-T) rounds (Transmittal 
        Numbered 18-47).
            (3) The proposed sale of 4,500 120MM Insensitive Munitions 
        High Explosive with Tracer (IM HE-T) tank rounds, field 
        implementation, testing inspections, spares and repair parts, 
        support and test equipment, field support publications and 
        technical data, U.S. government and contractor engineering and 
        logistics support services, personnel training and training 
        equipment, quality assurance team support services, preparation 
        of ammunition for shipment, ammunition delivery, component 
        improvement program and repair, other associated equipment and 
        support, and other related elements of logistical and program 
        support (Transmittal Numbered 18-47).
                                 <all>
```
Overview | **Guidelines** | Information Correction Requests and Appeals | Contact

2023 Information Quality Act Guidelines MS Word (72K)

2019 Interim Guidelines (superseded by the 2023 Guidelines) MS Word (108 KB) | PDF (102 KB)
2002 Guidelines (superseded by the 2019 Interim Guidelines) MS Word (43 KB)
  Last Modified: 09/28/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Melvin Pinkston, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 421]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J.), rendered on or about July 28, 2005, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and Buckley, JJ.
----

----

|   | (1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PhotoMedex, Inc.; |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                 |   | PHOTOMEDEX, INC.                                                  |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Dated: April 2, 2012 |   |                                                              |   |
|   |                 |   | By: /s/ Dolev Rafaeli                                             |   |
|   |                 |   |        Dolev Rafaeli           |   |
|   |                 |   |        Chief Executive Officer |   |

----

----
#### 2834.005-6 Full production.

The CAO is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 34.005-6.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 17 (Thursday, January 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Border Security Technology Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 12, 2021, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Border Security Technology 
Consortium (``BSTC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Carahsoft Technology Corporation, Reston, VA; JANTEQ 
Corporation, Irvine, CA; STRAX Intelligence Group, Boca Raton, FL; 
goTenna, Inc., Brooklyn, NY; International Electronic Machines 
Corporation, Troy, NY; CellAntenna Corp., Coral Springs, FL; and Shield 
AI Inc., San Diego, CA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Bruker Detection Corporation, Billerica, MA; Innovative 
Signal Analysis, Richardson, TX; Copious Imaging LLC, Lexington, MA; 
IDEMIA National Security Solutions, LLC, Alexandria, VA; Passport 
Systems, N. Billerica, MA; Planck Aerosystems, Inc., San Diego, CA; 
JANTEQ Corporation, Irvine, CA; SRC, Inc., North Syracuse, NY; CUBRC, 
Inc., Buffalo, NY; and Tribalco, LLC, Bethesda, MD have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and BSTC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 18, 
2012 (77 FR 36292).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 21, 
2020. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 19, 2020 (85 FR 73751).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-01890 Filed 1-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# C_2017251EN.01000401.xml

| 2.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/4

---

Calls for proposals and related activities under the ERC Work Programme 2018 under Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)

(2017/C 251/03)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of calls for proposals and related activities under the ERC Work Programme 2018 under Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020).

The Commission has adopted the ERC Work Programme 2018 (https://webgate.ec.testa.eu/ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018_2020/erc/h2020-wp18-erc_en.pdf) by Decision C(2017) 5307 of 2 August 2017.

Proposals are invited for these calls. The ERC Work Programme 2018, including deadlines and budgets, is available through the Participant Portal website along with information on the modalities of the calls and related activities and the information for applicants on how to submit proposals:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/home.html

---
#### 215.503 Notifications to unsuccessful offerors.

If the Government exercises the authority provided in 239.7305(d), the notifications to unsuccessful offerors, either preaward or postaward, shall not reveal any information that is determined to be withheld from disclosure in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3252 (see subpart 239.73).

[78 FR 69270, Nov. 18, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 4369, Feb. 15, 2019; 87 FR 76992, Dec. 16, 2022]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 362 

Recognizing the service of the Los Angeles-class attack submarine the USS 

Jacksonville and the crew of the USS Jacksonville, who served the 

United States with valor and bravery. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2017 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. NELSON) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the service of the Los Angeles-class attack submarine the USS Jacksonville and the crew of the USS 

Jacksonville, who served the United States with valor 

and bravery. 

Whereas the USS Jacksonville (SSN 699) is named after 

Jacksonville, the largest and most populous city in Florida, and is the first ship to bear that name; 

Whereas the slogan of the city of Jacksonville, Florida, is 

‘‘The Bold New City of the South’’ and inspired the nickname of the USS Jacksonville, which is ‘‘The Bold One’’; 

Whereas, on August 10, 2017, the USS Jacksonville returned 

to the home port of the USS Jacksonville at Joint Base 

Pearl Harbor-Hickam in the Western Pacific after 209 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 362 ATS 

days out to sea, thus completing the 15th and final deployment of the USS Jacksonville; 

Whereas, on the last deployment of the USS Jacksonville, the 

USS Jacksonville steamed more than 48,000 nautical 

miles while conducting— 

(1) maritime security operations in the areas of operation of the Fifth Fleet and Seventh Fleet of the 

United States; and 

(2) joint exercises with the Maritime Self-Defense 

Force of Japan and the navy of the Republic of India; 

Whereas, since the commissioning of the USS Jacksonville on 

May 16, 1981, the USS Jacksonville has completed 2 

around-the-world cruises, visited ports on nearly every 

continent, and completed countless critical missions; and 

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, while the USS Jacksonville 

was attached to the Enterprise Battle Group, the USS 

Jacksonville— 

(1) was in the Mediterranean Sea; and 

(2) stayed on-station to provide critical intelligence 

support as the United States prepared to retaliate in response to the terrorist attacks carried out on that day: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the service of 

2 the Los Angeles-class attack submarine the USS Jackson3 ville and the crew of the USS Jacksonville, who served 

4 the United States with valor and bravery. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc., 

Docket No. 16-15-03 

Complainants 

v. 

City of Renton 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by 

which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to January 

11 ' 2017. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

K vin C. Willis, Director 

1ce of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

ji)-/~ -/h 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 14, 2016, I caused to be emailed and placed in the 

United States mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy of the 

foregoing Notice addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Benjamin H. Klein 

Gross & Klein LLP 

Pier 9, Suite 100 

San Francisco CA 94111 

bhklein@grosskleinla w .com 

Counsel for Respondent 

Zanetta L. Fontes 

Senior Assistant City Attorney 

City of Renton 

1055 South Grady Way 

Renton, W A 98057 

zfontes@rentonwa.gov 

Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (A CO-l 00) 

Northwest Mountain Region, Compliance 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
## Legislation

- Title VII, Part A, Subpart 4, Section 724 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended  download filesMS Word (41K) | PDF (17K)
20 USC 1036b

The Master's Degree Programs at Predominantly Black Institutions Program was authorized by the Higher Education Opportunity Act, 2008, which reauthorized and extended the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

## Regulations

- Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

## Guidance

- Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Grants Management Circulars

Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 09/23/2011
|-------------------------
#### 312.101 Policy.

Contracting offices shall use the HHS Smarter Buying Program to the maximum extent practicable. See HHS Acquisition Regulation part 307, Acquisition Planning.
#### George Sassower, Appellant, v John P. Finnerty, as Sheriff of Suffolk County, Respondent. George Sassower, Appellant, v Sheriff of County of Suffolk, Respondent.

Appeal by petitioner from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 15, 1978, which transferred to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, his petition for relief pursuant to CPLR article 78 and a writ of habeas corpus. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an intermediate order in a habeas corpus proceeding (CPLR 7011) or, in the absence of permission, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 1). If we were not dismissing, we would affirm. The transfer was neither contrary to law nor an abuse of discretion (see CPLR 506, subd [b]; 7004, subd [c]). Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.