alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,021,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,154,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,089,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,527,900
<PP&E>                                       8,677,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,294,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,855,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,573,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        8,293,400
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,400,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,374,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,855,800
<SALES>                                      6,645,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,645,400
<CGS>                                        5,135,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,135,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,131,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,473,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,473,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,473,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
(November 12, 1963)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Bruno, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief. Such brief shall comply with the rules of this court (Rules, App. Div., 2d Dept., rule I, subd. 7; rule IV, subd. 2-B). The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February Term, beginning January 27, 1964; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion by appellant for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order denying, without a hearing, appellant’s *coram nobis*application. Appellant, therefore, either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. [See *People*v. *Breslin,*4 N Y 2d 73; *People*v. *Pitts,*6 N Y 2d 288.] Beldock, P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 26, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-250

Lower Tribunal Nos. 14-3027 CC, 20-232 AP

________________

Central Therapy Center, Inc., a/a/o Luis Gonzalez,

Appellant,

vs.

Progressive Select Insurance Company,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michaelle 

Gonzalez-Paulson, Judge.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); 

Corredor & Husseini, P.A., and Maria E. Corredor, for appellant.

deBeaubien, Simmons, Knight, Mantzaris & Neal, LLP, and Kenneth 

P. Hazouri (Orlando), for appellee.

Before EMAS, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM. 
2

Affirmed. See Miracle Health Servs., Inc., a/a/o Kirenia Tamayo, v. 

Progressive Select Ins. Co., 326 So. 3d 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  

Please wait a moment...

OCR home page
              [Know Your Rights] [Prevention] [Civil Rights                Data] [About OCR] [Reading Room]                [Related Links] [Previous Page]              
*This                  page last modified February 20, 2004 (webmaster@inet.ed.gov)* |
#### 3052.236-70 Special precautions for work at operating airports.

As prescribed in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3036.570, insert the following clause:

# Special Precautions for Work at Operating Airports (DEC 2003)

(a) When work is to be performed at an operating airport, the Contractor must arrange its work schedule so as not to interfere with flight operations. Such operations will take precedence over construction convenience. Any operations of the Contractor which would otherwise interfere with or endanger the operations of aircraft shall be performed only at times and in the manner directed by the Contracting Officer. The Government will make every effort to reduce the disruption of the Contractor's operation.

(b) Unless otherwise specified by local regulations, all areas in which construction operations are underway shall be marked by yellow flags during daylight hours and by red lights at other times. The red lights along the edge of the construction areas within the existing aprons shall be the electric type of not less than 100 watts intensity placed and supported as required. All other construction markings on roads and adjacent parking lots may be either electric or battery type lights. These lights and flags shall be placed so as to outline the construction areas and the distance between any two flags or lights shall not be greater than 25 feet. The Contractor shall provide adequate watch to maintain the lights in working condition at all times other than daylight hours. The hour of beginning and the hour of ending of daylight will be determined by the Contracting Officer.

(c) All equipment and material in the construction areas or when moved outside the construction area shall be marked with airport safety flags during the day and when directed by the Contracting Officer, with red obstruction lights at nights. All equipment operating on the apron, taxiway, runway, and intermediate areas after darkness hours shall have clearance lights in conformance with instructions from the Contracting Officer. No construction equipment shall operate within 50 feet of aircraft undergoing fuel operations. Open flames are not allowed on the ramp except at times authorized by the Contracting Officer.

(d) Trucks and other motorized equipment entering the airport or construction area shall do so only over routes determined by the Contracting Officer. Use of runways, aprons, taxiways, or parking areas as truck or equipment routes will not be permitted unless specifically authorized for such use. Flag personnel shall be furnished by the Contractor at points on apron and taxiway for safe guidance of its equipment over these areas to assure right of way to aircraft. Areas and routes used during the contract must be returned to their original condition by the Contractor. Airport management shall establish the maximum speed allowed at the airport. Vehicles shall be operated so as to be under safe control at all times, weather and traffic conditions considered. Vehicles must be equipped with head and taillights during the hours of darkness.

(End of clause)
# C_2017425EN.01000901.xml

| 12.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 December 2017

(2017/C 425/06)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1796 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4433 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88250 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0160 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1679 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,8825 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,601 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2033 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6323 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5084 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5674 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5168 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2093 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7049 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5936 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 285,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0618 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8069 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5420 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 978,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8004 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,392 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,7954 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,490 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8654 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,3042 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,9805 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1796

JPY

Japanese yen

133,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4433

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88250

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0160

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1679

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,8825

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,601

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2033

RON

Romanian leu

4,6323

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5084

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5674

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5168

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2093

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7049

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5936

KRW

South Korean won

1 285,61

ZAR

South African rand

16,0618

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8069

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5420

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 978,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8004

PHP

Philippine peso

59,392

RUB

Russian rouble

69,7954

THB

Thai baht

38,490

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8654

MXN

Mexican peso

22,3042

INR

Indian rupee

75,9805

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### John Molinari, Appellant, v. Garden Party House, Inc., Defendant, and Brunswick-Balke-Collender, Co., Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from judgment and order of Monroe Trial Term, for defendant Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. for no cause of action and dismissing the complaint and amended complaint. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
26.401 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Apparently wholesome food* means food that meets all quality and labeling standards imposed by Federal, State, and local laws and regulations even though the food may not be readily marketable due to appearance, age, freshness, grade, size, surplus, or other conditions, in accordance with (b)(2)of the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act (42 U.S.C. 1791(b)).
*Excess food* means food that— ( 1 ) Is not required to meet the needs of the executive agencies; and
( 2 ) Would otherwise be discarded.
*Food-insecure* means inconsistent access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food.
*Nonprofit organization* means any organization that is— ( 1 ) Described in section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
( 2 ) Exempt from tax under section 501(a) of that Code.
#### 2828.106-6 Furnishing information.

In accordance with FAR 28.106-6(c), the HCA, or designee at a level at or above the BPC, is the agency official authorized to furnish the certified copy of the bond and the contract.
University  of Alabama in Huntsville (AL): In March 2015, OCR resolved a complaint against  the University of Alabama in Huntsville alleging that staff members at the  university made impermissible inquiries regarding a service animal,  inappropriately excluded the service animal from some areas on campus, and  required additional training for the service animal at the expense of the  animal’s owner. During the course of the investigation, OCR also identified  that the university’s grievance procedures were not consistent with due process  standards and were inadequate to ensure a prompt, effective resolution. The  university entered into a resolution agreement with OCR in which it agreed to  revise its policies and grievance procedures and train staff regarding the new  policies and grievance procedures. The resolution agreement further required  the university to refund the cost of additional training required by the  university.

Read the Resolution Letter PDF (71.9K) | Read the Resolution Agreement PDF (708.3K)
31.205-52 Asset valuations resulting from business combinations. ( a ) For tangible capital assets, when the purchase method of accounting for a business combination is used, whether or not the contract or subcontract is subject to CAS, the allowable depreciation and cost of money shall be based on the capitalized asset values measured and assigned in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.404-50(d), if allocable, reasonable, and not otherwise unallowable.
( b ) For intangible capital assets, when the purchase method of accounting for a business combination is used, allowable amortization and cost of money shall be limited to the total of the amounts that would have been allowed had the combination not taken place.
[63 FR 9068, Feb. 23, 1998]
# C_2017418EN.01000801.xml

| 7.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/8

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2017/C 418/05)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| | EPSO/AD/354/17 — LATVIAN-LANGUAGE (LV) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/354/17 — LATVIAN-LANGUAGE (LV) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

| | EPSO/AD/355/17 — MALTESE-LANGUAGE (MT) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/355/17 — MALTESE-LANGUAGE (MT) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 418 A of 7 December 2017.

Official Journal of the European Union

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
# C_2019131EN.01000401.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/4

---

Taking of the oath by a new Member of the General Court

(2019/C 131/04)

Following her appointment as Judge at the General Court for the period from 11 March 2019 to 31 August 2019 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 6 March 2019 (1), Ms Frendo took the oath before the Court of Justice on 20 March 2019.

---

(1)  OJ L 69, 11.3.2019, p. 50.

---
# C_2019006EN.01000501.xml

| 9.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 January 2019

(2019/C 6/06)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1440 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4663 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89743 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1855 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1232 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 136,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7750 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,642 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3055 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6710 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,2851 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6042 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5208 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9671 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7023 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5549 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 288,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0365 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8405 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4296 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 181,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7053 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,057 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,7197 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,705 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2604 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1599 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,2450 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1440

JPY

Japanese yen

124,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4663

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89743

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1855

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1232

ISK

Iceland króna

136,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7750

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,642

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3055

RON

Romanian leu

4,6710

TRY

Turkish lira

6,2851

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6042

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5208

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9671

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7023

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5549

KRW

South Korean won

1 288,62

ZAR

South African rand

16,0365

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8405

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4296

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 181,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7053

PHP

Philippine peso

60,057

RUB

Russian rouble

76,7197

THB

Thai baht

36,705

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2604

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1599

INR

Indian rupee

80,2450

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
M. P. No. 75-143.

#### Alexander Murchison *v.*John H. Norberg, *Tax Administrator.*

*Aram K. Berberian,*for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Allen P. Rubine,*Special Asst. Attorney General, *Perry Shatkin,*Chief Legal Officer (Taxation), for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied. See *Langton*v. *Demers,*102 R. I. 375, 230 A.2d 870 (1967) ; *Moore*v. *Langton,*92 R. I. 141, 167 A.2d 558 (1961).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Flava Works, Inc., )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:12-cv-05844

)

FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com, et. al, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF, FLAVA WORKS, INC.’S,

MOTON FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT ORDER AGAINST 

DEFENDANT, FF MAGNAT LIMITED

Plaintiff, Flava Works, Inc. (“Flava”), by its attorneys, Meanith Huon, states as follows:

1. Flava served Defendant, FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com, via personal service 

on Maxim Bochenko on September 12, 2012 (Docket No. 8). See attached return of service.

2. Defendant, FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com has not filed an appearance or 

responded to the First Amended Complaint. 

3. Flava adopts the arguments and points it raised and made in its Response brief 

(Docket No. 23) to Defendant, Maxim Bochenko’s, Motion to Dismiss.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Flava Works, Inc., requests that this Honorable Court:

1. Enter an order of default against Defendant, FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com;

2. Set this matter for hearing on prove-up of damages against Defendant, FF Magnat

Limited d/b/a Oron.com.

Respectfully Submitted,

By: /s/ Meanith Huon /s/

Meanith Huon

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 24 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1457
Meanith Huon

ARDC No.: 6230996

PO Box 441

Chicago, IL 60690

312-405-2789

huon.meanith@gmail.com 

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 24 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:1458
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Flava Works, Inc., )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:12-cv-05844

)

) 

)

)

FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com, et. al., )

)

Defendants. )

PROOF OF SERVICE

Under penalties of law, I certify that on December 3, 2012, I served the following 

documents or items:

PLAINTIFF, FLAVA WORKS, INC.’S,

MOTON FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANT, FF MAGNAT 

LIMITED.

by electronically filing and serving a copy on Defendant, FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com by 

U.S. Mail by mailing a copy, postage prepaid, to the following address by depositing same from 

a U.S. Post Office Box in Chicago, IL on December 4, 2012 before 5:00 p.m.:

Defendant, FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com

c/o its agent Maxim Bochenko

2392 Sunset Bluff Drive

Jacksonville, Florida 32216

/s/ Meanith Huon

Meanith Huon

PO Box 441

Chicago, Illinois 60690

Phone: (312) 405-2789

E-mail: huon.meanith@gmail.com

IL ARDC. No.: 6230996

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 24 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:1459
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 24 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:1460
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Home |
|                                                   |

Christopher.Tate@ed.gov

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
NO. 07-10-00142-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 23, 2010

KYLE DEAN MERCHANT,  

Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_____________________________

FROM THE 12TH DISTRICT COURT OF WALKER COUNTY;

NO. 21,760; HONORABLE DONALD KRAEMER, PRESIDING

***On Motion to Dismiss***

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant Kyle Dean Merchant has filed a *pro se*motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it.  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  

Per Curiam

1