alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.3

                           SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
                            RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
                                 (Thousands except Ratio)
                                       (Unaudited)


Operating Income                                             $137,808

Adjustments:
  Income taxes                                                 41,304
  Provision for deferred income taxes                          (4,063)
  Deferred investment tax credits                              (4,712)
  Utility plant development costs, net of tax                 (22,298)
  Other income and deductions                                    (264)
  Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
    used during construction                                    1,743
  Interest portion of financing leases                          1,391
                                                              -------
        Earnings                                             $150,909
                                                              =======
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                                 $ 43,609
  Amortization of debt issuance cost                            3,457
  Other interest                                                4,612
  Interest portion of financing leases                          1,391
                                                              -------

        Fixed Charges                                        $ 53,069
                                                              =======


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                               2.84
                                                              =======
3006.302-7 Public interest. ( c ) ( 1 ) ( ii ) Requests shall be prepared in writing by the contracting officer, using the format found in (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.704, and submitted through the HCA to the CPO for review and transmittal to the Secretary for approval.
## Legislation

- Title III, Part B, Sections 321-327 of the Higher Education Act, as amended  ( 20 U.S.C. 1060-1063c )
- Title III, Part F, Section 371 of the Higher Education Act, as amended ( 20 U.S.C. 1067q )

## Regulations

- 34 CFR Part 608
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR), Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

## Guidance

- Office of Management and Budget (OMB)  Grants Management Circulars

Institutional Service Home
```

[House Report 111-518]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     111-518

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE 
BILL (H.R. 4173) TO PROVIDE FOR FINANCIAL REGULATORY REFORM, TO PROTECT 
CONSUMERS AND INVESTORS, TO ENHANCE FEDERAL UNDERSTANDING OF INSURANCE 
 ISSUES, TO REGULATE THE OVER-THE-COUNTER DERIVATIVES MARKETS, AND FOR 
                             OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

   June 30, 2010.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. Perlmutter, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1490]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1490, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report on H.R. 4173, the Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act of 2009, and against its consideration. 
The resolution provides that the conference report shall be 
considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the conference report to its adoption without 
intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate; and (2) one 
motion to recommit if applicable.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration includes a waiver of 
clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of 
conference reports and the accompanying joint explanatory 
statement). Although the rule waives all points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration, 
the conference report does not violate clause 9 of rule XXI. 
Although the waiver of all points of order against 
consideration of the conference report includes a waiver of 
clause 10 of rule XXI (regarding PAYGO), the conference report 
is in full compliance with statutory PAYGO.

                                  

```
#### 2414.408 Award.
3003.1004 Contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.203-70, Instructions for Contractor Disclosure of Violations, in solicitations and contracts containing the clause at (FAR) 48 CFR 52.203-13.
3.905-1 Remedies. ( a ) *Agency response to Inspector General report.* Not later than 30 days after receiving a report pursuant to 3.904-2, the head of the agency shall— ( 1 ) Determine whether sufficient basis exists to conclude that the contractor or subcontractor has subjected the employee who submitted the complaint to a reprisal as prohibited by 3.903; and
( 2 ) Either issue an order denying relief or take one or more of the following actions: ( i ) Order the contractor or subcontractor to take affirmative action to abate the reprisal.
( ii ) Order the contractor or subcontractor to reinstate the complainant employee to the position that the person held before the reprisal, together with compensatory damages (including back pay), employment benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment that would apply to the person in that position if the reprisal had not been taken.
( iii ) Order the contractor or subcontractor to pay the complainant employee an amount equal to the aggregate amount of all costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees and expert witnesses' fees) that were reasonably incurred by the complainant for, or in connection with, bringing the complaint regarding the reprisal, as determined by the head of the agency.
( iv ) Consider disciplinary or corrective action against any official of the executive agency, if appropriate.
( b ) *Complainant's right to go to court.* ( 1 ) Paragraph (b)(2) of this section applies if— ( i ) The head of the agency issues an order denying relief; or
( ii ) ( A ) The head of the agency has not issued an order— ( 1 ) Within 210 days after the submission of the complaint; or
( 2 ) Within 30 days after the expiration of an extension of time granted in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4712(b)(2)(B) for the submission of the report to those stated in 3.904-2(b); and
( B ) There is no showing that such delay is due to the bad faith of the complainant.
( 2 ) If the conditions in either paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section are met— ( i ) The complainant shall be deemed to have exhausted all administrative remedies with respect to the complaint; and
( ii ) The complainant may bring a *de novo* action at law or equity against the contractor or subcontractor to seek compensatory damages and other relief available under 41 U.S.C. 4712 in the appropriate district court of the United States, which shall have jurisdiction over such an action without regard to the amount in controversy. ( A ) Such an action shall, at the request of either party to the action, be tried by the court with a jury.
( B ) An action under this authority may not be brought more than 2 years after the date on which remedies are deemed to have been exhausted.
( c ) *Admissibility in evidence.* An Inspector General determination and an agency head order denying relief under this section shall be admissible in evidence in any *de novo* action at law or equity brought pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 4712.
( d ) *No waiver.* The rights and remedies provided for in 41 U.S.C. 4712 may not be waived by any agreement, policy, form, or condition of employment.
[88 FR 69521, Oct. 5, 2023]
Wegener Corporation and
subsidiary




EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, C.
Troy Woodbury, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Wegener Corporation (the
“Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 3, 2010 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:




•
            fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





•
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      C. Troy Woodbury, Jr.Name:
            C.
      Troy Woodbury, Jr.Title:
            President
      and Chief Executive Office
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
            November
      15, 2010
Note.

#### George McAlister *vs.*John E. Osborne.

June 2, 1890.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin, county, where the action was tried by *LoeJiren,*J.

*Hale & Peck,*for appellant.

*Weed Munro,*for respondent.

Gilfillan, C. J.

This case follows the decision in *Wilson*v. *Wilson supra,*p. 398.

Judgment affirmed.
31.104 Contracts with educational institutions. This category includes all contracts and contract modifications for research and development, training, and other work performed by educational institutions (defined as institutions of higher educations in the OMB Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, subpart A, and 20 U.S.C. 1001). ( a ) The contracting officer shall incorporate the cost principles and procedures in subpart 31.3 by reference in cost-reimbursement contracts with educational institutions as the basis for— ( 1 ) Determining reimbursable costs under the contracts and cost-reimbursement subcontracts thereunder performed by educational institutions;
( 2 ) Negotiating indirect cost rates; and
( 3 ) Settling costs of cost-reimbursement terminated contracts (see subpart 49.3 and 49.109-7).
( b ) The cost principles in this subpart are to be used as a guide in evaluating costs in connection with negotiating fixed-price contracts and termination settlements.
[48 FR 42301, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 45853, July 14, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         12,195 
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 103,750 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (4,337) 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              118,183       
<PP&E>                                        147,398      
<DEPRECIATION>                               (92,806)    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                334,493      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          83,603    
<BONDS>                                         7,892  
<COMMON>                                          279 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                    226,049       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  334,493         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              405,603          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 368,951          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,110       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (10,844)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,300      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (8,544)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  (7,558) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.27) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.27) 
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RONALD DENNIS FERLINGERE, Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE LIDIA STIGLICH, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents. No. 70441 

# FILED JUN 2 0 2016

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS This original pro se petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus challenges a May 12, 2016, district court order, which appears to pertain to service by mail and respondents' continued jurisdiction over the underlying case.

Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction or arbitrarily or capriciously abused its discretion in entering the May 12 order, a copy of which was not included with petitioner's supporting documents, or that a writ should issue to preclude respondent, the Honorable Lidia Stiglich, from exercising jurisdiction over the underlying case due to "lack of jurisdiction" or "fraud on the court." NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; NRAP 21(a)(4); 

### Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Din. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); 

### Pan v. Eighth Judicial

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947k 

# Ro-FifisDist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth

Judicial Din. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Douglas

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge Ronald Dennis Ferlingere Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**FLAS Tracking Survey Results:  2010-2018 Cohort**MS Word (337K) | PDF (697K)

**FLAS Tracking Survey Results:  2010 – 2014 Cohort**MS Word (1.04M) | PDF (688K)

**FLAS Tracking Survey Results:  2010 – 2012 Cohort**MS Word (985K) | PDF (717K)

## Annual Performance Report

Grantees under this program are required to submit an annual performance report (APR) through the International Resource Information System (IRIS). The Department provides grantees with the required password and other information needed to access the IRIS system. IRIS also includes a publicly accessible searchable database of abstracts of projects funded under OPE's international education programs.

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 60 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 60

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2018

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the reappointment of Barbara M. Barrett as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Barbara M. Barrett of Arizona on January 10, 2019, is filled by 
the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 
6 years, beginning on the later of January 11, 2019, or the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the Senate May 17, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### 2803.101-3 Agency regulations.

The DOJ regulations governing Standards of Conduct are contained in 5 CFR part 2635.
#### 1480.904 Challenge not timely.

If a CO receives an untimely filed challenge of a representation, the CO must notify the challenger that the challenge cannot be considered on the instant acquisition but will be considered in any future actions. However, the CO may question at any time, before or after award, the representation of an IEE.
#### Susan Khoury, an Infant by Her Guardian ad Litem, Victor Khoury, et al., Appellants, v. Tifo Cab Corp. et al., Respondents. Tifo Cab Corp., Respondent, v. North Starlight Export Corp., Respondent.

In consolidated actions to recover damages for injury to person and property, medical expenses and loss of services, arising out of an automobile accident, the plaintiffs Khoury appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 13, 1964, made upon reargument of a motion by defendant Paul Lombardi (in his capacity as a plaintiff in one of the actions) for a preference in trial pursuant to CPLR 3403, as, by severing said action and granting such preference limited thereto, in effect vacated prior court orders consolidating the several actions. Order modified as follows: (1) by striking out the second and third decretal paragraphs severing the plaintiff Lombardi’s action and directing that only such action be accorded a preference; and (2) by substituting therefor a paragraph according the preference in trial to all the actions as heretofore consolidated, and setting such actions down for trial at Trial Term, Part I, Supreme Court, Kings County, at the opening of the October 1964 Term. As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs Khoury payable by the defendant North Starlight Export Corp. In our opinion, the fact that plaintiff Lombardi is entitled to a preference which would not be available to the other plaintiffs except for the consolidation, is no reason for directing separate trials of these actions which arise out of a single motor vehicle collision *(Winter*v. *Powers,*241 App. Div. 743; cf. *Edwards*v. *Lewin,*284 App. Div. 28, 30). Lombardi’s alleged default in submitting to a physical examination and exchanging medical information is immaterial (cf. *Cohen*v. *American Soc. for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals,*20 A D 2d 922). Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
305.303 Announcement of contract awards. ( a ) *Public announcement.* The contracting officer shall report awards, not exempt under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 5.303, to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Legislation (Congressional Liaison Office.)
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Marvin F. Romanow, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Nexen Inc., a Canadian Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 7, 2004                          /s/ Marvin F. Romanow
                                           ---------------------
                                           Marvin F. Romanow
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.