alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

Program Map of Participating InstitutionsPrior-Year Awards

## FY 2023

                - List of grantees:    MS Excel  (14K)

## FY 2022

                - List of grantees:    MS Excel  (14K)

## FY 2021

                - List of grantees:    MS Excel  (13K)

## FY 2020

                - List of grantees:    MS Word  (15K)

## FY 2019

                - List of grantees:    MS Word  (15K)

## FY 2018

                - List of grantees:    MS Word  (15K)

## FY 2017

                - List of grantees:    MS Word  (15K)

## FY 2016

                - List of grantees:     MS Word  (47K)

## FY 2015

                - List of grantees:     MS Word  (16K)

## FY 2014

                - List of grantees:     MS Word  (43K)

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 41 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 41

   Expressing support for the work of open water lifeguards as first 
              responders and emergency response providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2023

Mr. Smith of New Jersey submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing support for the work of open water lifeguards as first 
              responders and emergency response providers.

Whereas open water lifeguards perform an essential function of protecting 
        countless lives from death or serious injury;
Whereas these lifeguards do so at great risk to their own lives;
Whereas, in 2021, two lifeguards in the State of New Jersey lost their lives 
        while performing their duty;
Whereas many open water lifeguards are cross-trained in emergency medical 
        response, marine fire safety, law enforcement, and water rescue craft 
        operations;
Whereas lifeguards respond and attend to victims, treat victims, assist victims, 
        and transport victims, the 4 defined duties of a emergency response 
        employee;
Whereas lifeguards not only protect life, but also property, evidence, and the 
        environment, the 4 tenets which define a first responder;
Whereas United States law already recognizes open water lifeguards as first 
        responders or emergency response providers;
Whereas many other countries recognize lifeguards as emergency responders, and 
        grant them access to the programs to which first responders are 
        entitled; and
Whereas, during the COVID-19 emergency, open water lifeguards ought to have been 
        considered ``essential workers'' and given priority access to 
        vaccinations: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress reaffirms that open water lifeguards qualify as first 
responders and emergency response providers, and recognizes the 
essential, lifesaving work performed by these brave individuals.
                                 <all>
```
#### 252.227-7003 Termination.

As prescribed at 227.7009-2(c), insert the following clause in patent releases, license agreements, and assignments:

# Termination (AUG 1984)

Notwithstanding any other provision of this contract, the Government shall have the right to terminate the within license, in whole or in part, by giving the Contractor not less than thirty (30) days notice in writing of the date such termination is to be effective; provided, however, that such termination shall not affect the obligation of the Government to pay royalties which have accrued prior to the effective date of such termination.

(End of clause)
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 464 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work 

Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2018 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Ms. HEITKAMP, and Mr. TILLIS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

APRIL 26, 2018 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Take Our Daughters 

And Sons To Work Day. 

Whereas the Take Our Daughters To Work program was created in New York City as a response to research that 

showed that, by the 8th grade, many girls were dropping 

out of school, had low self-esteem, and lacked confidence; 

Whereas, in 2003, the name of the program was changed to 

‘‘Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work’’ so that boys 

who face many of the same challenges as girls could also 

be involved in the program; 

Whereas, in 2018, the mission of the program, to develop 

‘‘innovative strategies that empower girls and boys to 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 464 ATS 

overcome societal barriers to reach their full potential’’, 

fully reflects the addition of boys; 

Whereas the Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Foundation, a nonprofit organization, has grown to be one of 

the largest public awareness campaigns, with more than 

40,000,000 participants annually in more than 3,500,000 

organizations and workplaces representing each State; 

Whereas, in 2007, the Take Our Daughters To Work program transitioned to Elizabeth City, North Carolina, became known as the Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work Foundation, and received national recognition for 

its dedication to future generations; 

Whereas, every year, mayors, governors, and other private 

and public officials sign proclamations and lend support 

to Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Day; 

Whereas the fame of the Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work program has spread overseas, with requests and inquiries being made from around the world on how to operate the program; 

Whereas 2018 marks the 25th anniversary of the Take Our 

Daughters And Sons To Work program; 

Whereas Take Our Daughters And Sons to Work Day will 

be observed on Thursday, April 26, 2018; and 

Whereas, by offering opportunities for children to experience 

activities and events, Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work Day is intended to continue helping millions of 

girls and boys on an annual basis to examine their opportunities and strive to reach their fullest potential: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 464 ATS 

1 (1) recognizes the goals of introducing our 

2 daughters and sons to the workplace; and 

3 (2) commends all participants of Take Our 

4 Daughters And Sons To Work Day for the— 

5 (A) ongoing contributions that the partici6 pants make to education; and 

7 (B) vital role that the participants play in 

8 promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger fu9 ture for the United States. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 135 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2017, as ‘‘Silver Star 

Service Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2017 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2017, 

as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

who were wounded or became ill in combat in the wars 

fought by the United States; 

Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to 

help the people of the United States remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill members of the 

Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver 

Star Service Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 135 IS 

Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of 

America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices made by 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans on behalf of 

the United States through the presence of a Silver Star 

Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying; 

Whereas the sacrifices made by members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans on behalf of the United States 

should never be forgotten; and 

Whereas May 1, 2017, is an appropriate date to designate as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of May 1, 2017, as 

3 ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’; and 

4 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

5 to observe Silver Star Service Banner Day with ap6 propriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2084

_____________________________

RYAN TOMPKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County.

Jennifer Johnson, Acting Circuit Judge.

August 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# C_2017189EN.01002902.xml

| 15.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/29

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8190 — Weichai/Kion)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 189/05)

On 15 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8190. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8190. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 504 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 504

     Designating May 11, 2018, as Military Spouse Appreciation Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2018

    Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Tillis) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating May 11, 2018, as Military Spouse Appreciation Day.

Whereas the month of May marks National Military Appreciation Month;
Whereas the Senate recognizes military spouses' dedication of a lifetime of 
        love, support, and patriotism that helps make the service and sacrifice 
        of the men and women in the Armed Forces possible;
Whereas military spouses have been separated from loved ones because of the duty 
        of our Armed Forces to protect our Nation and its interests through 
        deployment in support of overseas contingency operations and other 
        military missions;
Whereas the establishment of Military Spouse Appreciation Day honors the 
        dedication and contributions of spouses of members of the Armed Forces; 
        and
Whereas, May 11, 2018, would be an appropriate date to establish as ``Military 
        Spouse Appreciation Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 11, 2018, as ``Military Spouse 
        Appreciation Day'';
            (2) honors and recognizes the dedication and contributions 
        made by spouses of members of the Armed Forces; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        Military Spouse Appreciation Day to promote awareness of the 
        dedication and contributions of spouses of members of the Armed 
        Forces and the importance of the role of military spouses in 
        the lives of members of the Armed Forces and veterans.
                                 <all>
```
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 350 

Recognizing the 69th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human 

Rights and the celebration of ‘‘Human Rights Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. COONS (for himself, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. INHOFE, Ms. 

BALDWIN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. BROWN, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. 

MCCAIN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. 

MERKLEY, Mr. CASEY, Mr. WYDEN, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 69th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the celebration of ‘‘Human 

Rights Day’’. 

Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations 69 years ago on December 10, 

1948, represents the first comprehensive agreement 

among nations as to the specific rights and freedoms of 

all human beings; 

Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights upholds 

the basic principles of liberty and freedom enshrined in 

the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of 

Rights; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 350 IS 

Whereas awareness of human rights— 

(1) is essential to the realization of fundamental 

freedoms; 

(2) promotes equality; 

(3) contributes to preventing conflict and human 

rights violations; and 

(4) enhances participation in democratic processes; 

Whereas Congress has a proud history of promoting human 

rights that are internationally recognized; and 

Whereas December 10 of each year is celebrated around the 

world as ‘‘Human Rights Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 69th anniversary of the Uni3 versal Declaration of Human Rights and the celebra4 tion of ‘‘Human Rights Day’’; 

5 (2) supports the ideals of human rights and re6 affirms the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; 

7 (3) encourages all nations to continue working 

8 towards freedom, peace, and security, which can be 

9 achieved through democracy, respect for human 

10 rights, and the rule of law; and 

11 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe ‘‘Human Rights Day’’ and continue a 

13 commitment to upholding freedom, democracy, and 

14 human rights across the globe. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### Edward A. Moller et al., Respondents, v. Candlewood Construction Corp., Appellant.

In an action by the purchasers of a newly constructed house against the builder to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated October 19, 1960, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. At the title closing, defendant agreed, in writing, to complete certain unfinished work, to correct any “water condition” in the basement, and to guarantee a dry basement for one year thereafter. This action is based upon the allegation that the basement *“*continues to become flooded ”, Defendant denies that there is any “water condition” in the basement. Defendant contends that, if there is any such condition, it was created by plaintiffs themselves because they changed the contour and grade of the land causing water to flow towards, rather than away from, the house, in violation of provisions in the contract of sale which obligated plaintiffs to adequately maintain necessary embankments and not to disturb any berms, swales, or controlled ponding. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied. Defendant’s denial that there is wetness in plaintiffs’ basement is sufficient to raise a triable issue. Defendant need not present facte in support of this denial, since the basement is under the exclusive control of the *960plaintiffs and since the basement has not been inspected by defendant for about a year *(De France*v. *Oestrike,*8 A D 2d 735). In addition, plaintiffs have not denied defendant’s claim that they have failed to maintain the grade of the land, in breach of provisions of the contract of sale. Such provisions, since they do not relate to title and are to be performed subsequent to title closing, survived the delivery of the deed (1 Warren’s Weed, New York Real Property [4th ed.], p. 701, §§ 26.01, 26.02). Defendant’s claim of breach of contract, by plaintiffs, may be advanced to defeat a motion for summary judgment, although not affirmatively pleaded in the answer *(Curry*v. *MacKenzie,*239 N. Y. 267); and defendant’s claim is sufficient to defeat summary judgment for plaintiffs if it equals or exceeds the plaintiffs’ claim *(Nussbaum*v. *Sobel,*269 App. Div. 105). Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., concurs in result.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05252

Honorable Marvin E. Aspen

Jay Marshall Strabala

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, August 29, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown: Status hearing held.

Settlement conference set for 11/8/12 at 11:00 a.m. Plaintiff shall serve the settlement

letter on defendant pursuant to paragraph one of this Court's standing order for settlement

conference by 9/21/12. The defendant shall serve the responsive letter to the plaintiff's

settlement letter by 10/12/12. Following the exchange of letters, counsel for the parties

shall have a telephone conference to see whether this case can settle on the basis of the

letters. If the case cannot be settled on the basis of the letters, counsel for the plaintiff shall

fax or deliver copies of the parties' settlement letters to this Court's courtroom deputy by

10/25/12. Notices mailed by Judicial staff. (psm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05252 Document #: 59 Filed: 08/29/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:861
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 12821 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:17

- cr - 00013

- MTT

- CHW

- 8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ANTONIO MENDEZ

- RAMOS , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________ (May 10, 2021) Before GRANT , LAGOA , and BRASHER , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM : Antonio Mendez

- Ramos appeals his 210

- month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. The g overnment has moved to

USCA11 Case: 20-12821 Date Filed: 05/10/2021 Page: 1 of 22 dismiss based on the appeal waiver contained in the plea agreement. Because we find that Mendez

- Ramos kno wingly and voluntarily agreed to the appeal waiver and that this appeal does not fall under any of the waiver’s exception s , the government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Weaver , 275 F.3d 1320, 1333 (11th Cir. 2001) ( appeal waiver was valid when the district court

“ referenced ” it during the Rule 11 plea colloquy and the defe ndant “ agreed that she understood the provision and that she entered into it freely and voluntarily ” ).

USCA11 Case: 20-12821 Date Filed: 05/10/2021 Page: 2 of 2