alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019223EN.01000501.xml

| 3.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 July 2019

(2019/C 223/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1301 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4639 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89443 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5565 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1169 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6715 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,462 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,91 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2429 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7331 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,3891 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6155 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4819 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8194 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6956 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5317 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 318,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9594 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7706 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3965 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 976,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6769 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,781 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,4958 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,643 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3381 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5491 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,9280 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1301

JPY

Japanese yen

122,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4639

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89443

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5565

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1169

ISK

Iceland króna

141,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6715

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,462

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,91

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2429

RON

Romanian leu

4,7331

TRY

Turkish lira

6,3891

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6155

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4819

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8194

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6956

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5317

KRW

South Korean won

1 318,30

ZAR

South African rand

15,9594

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7706

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3965

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 976,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6769

PHP

Philippine peso

57,781

RUB

Russian rouble

71,4958

THB

Thai baht

34,643

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3381

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5491

INR

Indian rupee

77,9280

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 11 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself, Mr. GOLDEN of Maine, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. 

BANKS, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. BRECHEEN, Mr. 

BUCK, Mr. BURLISON, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. FERGUSON, 

Mr. FRY, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Mr. HERN, Mr. LATURNER, 

Ms. MACE, Mr. MANN, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. MAST, Mr. MILLS, Mr. MOORE

of Alabama, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. PERRY, Mr. SELF, Mr. WILLIAMS of New 

York, Mr. BURCHETT, Mr. LALOTA, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

SANTOS, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. TIMMONS, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. NUNN of Iowa, Mr. PALMER, Mr. COMER, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. 

ROY, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. LAHOOD, Mrs. CAMMACK, 

and Mrs. FISCHBACH) submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of terms that a Member 

of Congress may serve. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 11 IH 

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

3 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

4 for ratification: 

5 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

6 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has served 3 terms as 

7 a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House 

8 of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the elec9 tion of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Rep10 resentatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 

11 the number of terms that such person has served as a Rep12 resentative if the person fills the vacancy for more than 

13 1 year. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has served 2 terms as 

15 a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to 

16 the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election or 

17 appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate 

18 shall be included as 1 term in determining the number 

19 of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the 

20 person fills the vacancy for more than 3 years. 

21 ‘‘SECTION 3. No term beginning before the date of 

22 the ratification of this article shall be taken into account 

23 in determining eligibility for election or appointment under 

24 this article.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Legislation

- Title VIII, Section 873 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1138-1138d; Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2021, H.R. 7614, 116th Congress (2020); the explanatory statement accompanying H.R. 133 (Pub. L. 116-260).     Note:  Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Federal civil rights laws and Supreme Court precedent.

Regulations

- Applicable Regulations:  (a)  The Education Department General Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99.  (b)  The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485.  (c)  The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. 

FIPSE Home
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 129 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 129

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Departments of Labor, 
 the Treasury, and Health and Human Services relating to ``Short-Term, 
  Limited-Duration Insurance and Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted 
                          Benefits Coverage''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2024

  Mr. Self (for himself, Mr. Roy, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. 
  Tiffany, Mr. Brecheen, and Mr. Ogles) submitted the following joint 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 
 and in addition to the Committees on Education and the Workforce, and 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Departments of Labor, 
 the Treasury, and Health and Human Services relating to ``Short-Term, 
  Limited-Duration Insurance and Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted 
                          Benefits Coverage''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Departments of Labor, the Treasury, and Health 
and Human Services relating to ``Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance 
and Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits Coverage'' (89 Fed. 
Reg. 23338 (April 3, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
31.205-10 Cost of money. ( a ) *General.* Cost of money— ( 1 ) Is an imputed cost that is not a form of interest on borrowings (see 31.205-20);
( 2 ) Is an “incurred cost” for cost-reimbursement purposes under applicable cost-reimbursement contracts and for progress payment purposes under fixed-price contracts; and
( 3 ) Refers to— ( i ) Facilities capital cost of money (48 CFR 9904.414); and
( ii ) Cost of money as an element of the cost of capital assets under construction (48 CFR 9904.417).
( b ) Cost of money is allowable, provided— ( 1 ) It is measured, assigned, and allocated to contracts in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.414 or measured and added to the cost of capital assets under construction in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.417, as applicable;
( 2 ) The requirements of 31.205-52, which limit the allowability of cost of money, are followed; and
( 3 ) The estimated facilities capital cost of money is specifically identified and proposed in cost proposals relating to the contract under which the cost is to be claimed.
( c ) Actual interest cost in lieu of the calculated imputed cost of money is unallowable.
[68 FR 28091, May 22, 2003]
#### Cecelia C. Orlando et al., Respondents, v. Frank A. Catanzariti, Appellant.

In an action in the nature of “ strict foreclosure ” under subdivision 2 of section 1082 of the Civil Practice Act, defendant appeals from a final judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated February 23, 1960, and entered April 18, 1960, after a nonjury trial, in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant also brings up for review the interlocutory judgment of said court, dated and entered November 7, 1959, in favor of plaintiffs. Judgments affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 40 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 40

 Expressing support for local law enforcement officers and condemning 
     efforts to defund or dismantle local law enforcement agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2023

Mr. Buck (for himself and Mr. Biggs) submitted the following concurrent 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for local law enforcement officers and condemning 
     efforts to defund or dismantle local law enforcement agencies.

Whereas our brave men and women in local law enforcement work tirelessly to 
        protect the communities they serve;
Whereas local law enforcement officers are tasked with upholding the rule of law 
        and ensuring public safety;
Whereas local law enforcement officers selflessly put themselves in harm's way 
        to fight crime, get drugs off our streets, and protect the innocent;
Whereas, in the summer of 2020, looting, rioting, and violence in major cities 
        caused the destruction of many shops, restaurants, and businesses;
Whereas, in 2020, the United States tallied more than 21,000 murders--the 
        highest total since 1995 and 4,900 more than in 2019;
Whereas leftist activists and progressive politicians called for the defunding 
        and dismantling of local police departments across the country and 
        actively encouraged resentment toward local law enforcement;
Whereas the defund the police movement vilifies and demonizes local law 
        enforcement officers and puts them at greater risk of danger;
Whereas many local jurisdictions defunded their police departments and saw a 
        subsequent increase in violent crime;
Whereas violent leftist extremists have repeatedly attacked and assaulted local 
        law enforcement officers; and
Whereas local law enforcement officers deserve our respect and profound 
        gratitude: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes and appreciates the dedication and devotion 
        demonstrated by the men and women of local law enforcement who 
        keep our communities safe; and
            (2) condemns calls to defund, disband, dismantle, or 
        abolish the police.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
(the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 30, 2006



By

/S/ Takeo FukuiName:

Takeo FukuiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer Honda Motor Co.,
Ltd.
# FY 2011 Grantees
# C_2017200EN.01000102.xml

| 23.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8475 — Softbank Group/Fortress Investment Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 200/02)

On 16 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8475. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8475. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
301.603-1 General. ( a ) The Agency head has delegated broad authority to the Chief Acquisition Officer, who in turn has further delegated this authority to the SPE. The SPE has further delegated specific acquisition authority to the Operating and Staff Division heads and the HCAs. The HCA (non-delegable) shall select, appoint, and terminate the appointment of contracting officers.
( b ) To ensure proper control of redelegated acquisition authorities, HCAs shall maintain a file containing successive delegations of HCA authority through the contracting officer level.
# C_2017321EN.01000901.xml

| 28.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/9

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2017/C 321/07)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AST/142/17 — PROOFREADERS/LANGUAGE EDITORS (AST 3) for the following languages:

Danish (DA), Croatian (HR), Maltese (MT), Dutch (NL), Slovenian (SL) and Swedish (SV)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 321 A of 28 September 2017.

Official Journal of the European Union

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Clara Markidis et al., Respondents, v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision and award of death benefits to the deceased employee’s parents. Decedent, a 22-year-old airline stewardess, was killed in an airplane crash on February 3, 1959. The sole issue raised on appeal is the propriety of the board’s finding of partial dependency. Upon the testimony, letters, etc,, we find that the board was within the proper exercise of its fact-finding powers, especially in determining issues of credibility, in holding that decedent was sending home contributions of around $100 a month. A more difficult problem is posed by the fact that there is no evidence in the record showing the effect of the loss of decedent’s contributions on claimants’ income and expenses or that the claimants could not subsist on the income they received each month. At the time of the death claimants’ income was $226.38 per month, $110.38 per month from a second mortgage, which income terminated in 1962, and $116 social security. While there is not an itemization of family income, as compared with its expenses, as is ordinarily required *(Matter of Martorana*v. *Tensolite Insulated Wire Co.,*14 A D 2d 462) we have held that such evidence is not needed where it is reasonable for the board to infer from the paucity of the family income that the family was detrimentally affected by the loss of decedent’s contributions *(Matter of Holloway*v. *Camp Hatikvah,*14 A D 2d 638). Our review is thus limited to whether the board in a given case is justified in making an award without proof of income and expenses. In *Martorana*we held $5,209 was “substantial” income necessitating further proof whereas in *Holloway*we held the family could obviously be found destitute where its income was $100 a year cash plus whatever produce could be grown on their small North Carolina farm. Here the family income, $2,700, although not sufficiently low to amount to abject destitution as in *Holloway,*is not sufficiently high for us to disturb the board’s determination. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
#### 3.101-1 General.

Government business shall be conducted in a manner above reproach and, except as authorized by statute or regulation, with complete impartiality and with preferential treatment for none. Transactions relating to the expenditure of public funds require the highest degree of public trust and an impeccable standard of conduct. The general rule is to avoid strictly any conflict of interest or even the appearance of a conflict of interest in Government-contractor relationships. While many Federal laws and regulations place restrictions on the actions of Government personnel, their official conduct must, in addition, be such that they would have no reluctance to make a full public disclosure of their actions.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Steven M. Besbeck,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-KSB of Aspyra, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the smallbusiness issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors:

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 31, 2006 | /S/ Steven M. Besbeck                 |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Steven M. Besbeck                     |
|                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
3015.606 Agency procedures. ( a ) The agency authority to establish procedures for receiving, reviewing and evaluating, and timely disposing of unsolicited proposals, consistent with the requirements of (FAR) 48 CFR 15.6 and this subpart, is delegated to each HCA.
( b ) The agency authority to establish points of contact (see (FAR) 48 CFR 15.604) to coordinate the receipt and handling of unsolicited proposals is delegated to each HCA. Contracting offices are designated as the receiving point for unsolicited proposals. Persons within DHS (e.g., technical personnel) who receive proposals shall forward them to their cognizant contracting office.