alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/16/2015 5:50:28 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
3016.203-4 Contract clauses. ( d ) ( 2 ) Any clause using this method shall be prepared and approved by the contracting officer.
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 4 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:26
3035.017 Federally Funded Research and Development Centers. ( a ) In accordance with section 309(b) of the Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 189(b), DHS may be a joint sponsor under a multiple agency sponsorship arrangement with the Department of Energy (DOE) of one or more DOE national laboratories or sites. DOE shall be the primary sponsor under any multiple agency sponsorship arrangement with DOE laboratories or sites. Work performed by a DOE national laboratory or site under a joint sponsorship arrangement with DHS Components shall comply with policy on the use of Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) in (FAR) 48 CFR 35.017.
[71 FR 25771, May 2, 2006, as amended at 71 FR 48802, Aug. 22, 2006]
#### 252.237-7014 Loss or damage (count-of-articles).

As prescribed in 237.7101(c), use the following clause:

# Loss or Damage (Count-of-Articles) (DEC 1991)

(a) The count-of-articles will be—

(1) The count of the Contracting Officer; or

(2) The count agreed upon as a result of a joint count by the Contractor and the Contracting Officer at the time of delivery to the Contractor.

(b) The Contractor shall—

(1) Be liable for return of the number and kind of articles furnished for service under this contract; and

(2) Shall indemnify the Government for any loss or damage to such articles.

(c) The Contractor shall pay to the Government the value of any lost or damaged property using Federal supply schedule price lists. If the property is not on these price lists, the Contracting Officer shall determine a fair and reasonable price.

(d) The Contracting Officer will allow credit for any depreciation in the value of the property at the time of loss or damage. The Contracting Officer and the Contractor shall mutually determine the amount of the allowable credit.

(e) Failure to agree upon the value of the property or on the amount of credit due will be treated as a dispute under the Disputes clause of this contract.

(f) In case of damage to any property that the Contracting Officer and the Contractor agree can be satisfactorily repaired, the Contractor may repair the property at its expense in a manner satisfactory to the Contracting Officer, rather than make payment under paragraph (c) of this clause.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 3416, Jan. 23, 2006]
Exhibit
23


Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

















We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers
333-63037, 333-116801, 333-157143 and 333-157144 on Forms S-8 and S-3 of Farmers
Capital Bank Corporation of our report dated March 11, 2009 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report appears
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Farmers Capital Bank Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 2008.











Crowe
Horwath LLP


Louisville,
Kentucky


March 11,
2009
















85
Exhibit
10.(b)


 


CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form N-4  (File Nos. 333-115212 and 811-8108) of our report dated March 30,
2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears
in Protective Life Insurance Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and is included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 10
to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File Nos. 333-115212 and
811-8108).  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 of
our report dated April 24, 2009, relating to the financial statements of
The Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which is included in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4
(File Nos. 333-115212 and 811-8108).


 


 





PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP 


Birmingham,
AL


October 28,
2009
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Home |
|                                                   |

Program Description

The No Child Left Behind Act amended the Department of Education Act to require the Department to establish the ‘Coordinator for the Outlying Areas’ position. School Support and Rural Programs currently employs the Departments Coordinator for the Outlying Areas, who: (1) serves as the principal advisor to the Department on Federal matters affecting the outlying areas; (2) evaluates, on a periodic basis, the needs of education programs in the outlying areas; (3) assists with the coordination of programs that serve the outlying areas; and (4) provides guidance to programs within the Department that serve the outlying areas.

As used in this section, the term outlying areas includes Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands, but does not include the Freely Associated States of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau. 

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **WRITTEN    STATEMENT****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF    THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the    VICE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE    FINANCE CORPORATION (the “Company”), pursuant to    18 U.S.C. § 1350, hereby certifies that to the    best of their knowledge:      (i)        the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended    December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies    with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and      (ii)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     Dated: February 29, 2008/s/  Steven    F. Udvar-Hazy    Steven F. Udvar-Hazy     Dated: February 29, 2008/s/  Alan    H. Lund    Alan H. Lund
#### 36.211 Distribution of advance notices and solicitations.

(a) Advance notices and solicitations should be distributed to reach as many prospective offerors as practicable. Contracting officers may send notices and solicitations to organizations that maintain, without charge to the public, display rooms for the benefit of prospective offerors, subcontractors, and material suppliers. If requested by such organizations, this may be done for all or a stated class of construction projects on an annual or semiannual basis. Contracting officers may determine the geographical extent of distribution of advance notices and solicitations on a case-by-case basis.

(b) As required by 15 U.S.C. 644(w), the contracting officer shall transmit to the Governmentwide point of entry (GPE) a notice (see 5.205(h), in solicitation notices posted at the GPE for construction contracts anticipated to be awarded to a small business pursuant to part 19. The notice shall include certain information regarding the agency's definitization of equitable adjustments for change orders under construction contracts. This information includes:

(1) A description of agency policies or procedures, in addition to that outlined in FAR 43.204, that apply to definitization of equitable adjustments for change orders under construction contracts. This description may be provided in a notice by including an address of an agency-specific, publicly accessible website containing this information. If no agency-specific additional policies and procedures exist, the notice shall include a statement to that effect.

(2) Data on the agency's past performance, for the prior 3 fiscal years, regarding the time required to definitize equitable adjustments for change orders under construction contracts (see 43.204). If fewer than 3 fiscal years of data are available, agencies shall provide data for the number of fiscal years that are available. Data shall be provided in the solicitation notice as shown in the following table, or provide the address of an agency-specific, publicly accessible website containing this information. An adequate change order definitization proposal shall contain sufficient information to enable the contracting officer to conduct meaningful analyses and audits of the information contained in the proposal.

| Time to definitize after receipt of an adequate change order definitization proposal under
construction contracts | Number of change order proposals definitized under construction contracts |
| --- | --- |
| 30 days or less | |
| 31 to 60 days | |
| 61 to 90 days | |
| 91 to 180 days | |
| 181 to 365 days | |
| 366 or more days | |
| After completion of contract performance via a contract modification addressing all undefinitized equitable adjustments received during contract performance | |

Table 1 to Paragraph (b)(2)

[87 FR 58231, Sept. 23, 2022]
NO. 07-04-0382-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 9, 2005

______________________________ PRESTON HOWARD, APPELLANT

V. DEREK LEE NIEHAUS AND BRIAN NIEHAUS, APPELLEES

_________________________________ FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF GREGG COUNTY; NO. 2004- 00137-C; HONORAB LE ALFON SO CHARL ES, JUDG E

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL , JJ.
MEMORAND UM OPINION Appellant

Preston Howard appeals a direct ed verdi ct from theCounty Court at Law No. 2 ordering that he take nothing from his suit for damages from an automobil e accident with appellees Derek Lee Niehaus and Brian Niehaus. The case was origina llyt ried in Justice Court, Pr

ecinct 2 under its

small cl aims juri sdiction

. Follow ing a be nch trial , Howard2

obtained a judgment against the Niehauses in the amount of $4,418.86. The Niehauses subsequentlyappealed to the County Court at Law No. 2 where the case was tried de novo before a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence, the Niehauses moved for directed verdict alleging that Howard failed to present any evidenc e pertain ing to da mages. Th e trial court granted the motion and rendered judgment in favor of the Nieh auses, or

dering th at Howard take nothing by his s uit. Howard now appe als thisjudgment. The Niehauses assert this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. We a gree. Appeal from a jud gment of s mall cla ims court is to thecounty court or co unty cour t at law. T ex. Gov’ t Code An n. § 28.052 (Vernon 2 004). Th e county court or county

court at law hea rs the app eal de n ovo, and judgment o n appeal is final

. Id. at§ 28.053 (b), (d). The word “fin al” means th at there is no further appeal to any other court. Woodlands Plumbing Co. v. Rodgers, 47 S.W.3d 146, 148 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 2001, pe t. denied ); Davis v. Covert, 983 S.W.2d 301, 3 02 (Tex.App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. dism’d w.o.j.). In his reply

brief, How ard cites section 22.220 of the Government Code which provides that each court of appeals has juris diction of “all c ivil cas es . . . when the amount in controversy or the judgment rendered exceeds $100 . . . .” Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.220(a) (Vernon 2004). Although this statute somewhat conflicts with section 28.05 3, appell ate courts have cons istently held tha t this con flict is resolved by the ru le of sta tutory construction which provides that when two statutes conflict, the specific controls over the general. See, e.g. , Howell Aviation S ervs. v. Aeri al Ads, Inc., 29 S.W.3d 321, 323 (Tex.App.–Dallas 2000, no pet.); Gas k ill v. Sneaky Enters., Inc., 997 S.W.2d 296, 2973

(Tex.App .–Fort Wor

th 1999, pe t. denied ); Davis , 983 S.W.2d at 303. Therefore, we hold that judgment of a county court at law on an appeal from small claims court is final and not appeala ble to th e courts of appeal s. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Don H. Reavis Justice
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129001 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129001 

 COA: 262194 

Macomb CC: 99-001764-FC 

ROBERT FRANCIS GALLAGHER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2005 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
');
	document.write('

November 6, 2012

Letter sent to Governor Andrew Cuomo, Governor Chris Christie, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin, and Governor Dan Malloy

Dear Governor:

As the nation tracked Hurricane Sandy's destructive course along the  eastern seaboard, President Obama directed federal, state, and city agencies to  work together to remove barriers and expedite the work necessary to recover  from this storm.

As the storm approached the coast, President Obama said, "My message to  the governors, as well as to the mayors, is anything they need, we will be  there.  And we're going to cut through red tape."

In that spirit, we want to reach out to you jointly.  We know that access to early care and education  services has been disrupted for many families in the communities hardest hit by  Hurricane Sandy.  Because restoring  access to child care, Head Start, and other early learning programs can provide  stability for children as families reconstruct their lives and return to work,  we stand ready to help you in any way we can as you seek creative ways to get  children back into safe and nurturing early education programs.

We encourage communities to use available space wherever it can be  found throughout the affected regions to support child care, Head Start, and  other early learning providers in need of a safe haven for children.  We are providing separate guidance to Head  Start grantees and State Child Care Administrators describing how federally  funded early learning programs can use broader flexibility in their operations  during this time when you are responding to the aftermath of the storm.  The guidance will explain how this  flexibility can be used to move programs to temporary facilities safely but flexibly  and without running afoul of federal requirements.

We encourage state and local leaders, early care and education  directors, community organizations, school district superintendents, and  principals in affected communities to work together to use available space  within elementary schools, middle schools, high schools, libraries, community  colleges, churches, and civic clubs to relocate our youngest children to places  of safety and security.

If you need any assistance as you seek to relocate programs, please  have your staff contact Linda Smith, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Early  Childhood Development at the Department of Health and Human Services, (202)  401-9200, or David Esquith, Director of the Office of Safe and Healthy Students  at the Department of Education, (202) 245-7336.

Sincerely,



/s/
      /s/Arne Duncan
      Kathleen SebeliusSecretary of Education
      Secretary of Health & Human Services
----

| (1)   | The                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                           |                                   |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|         |                                                                                                           |
|    |                                                                                                      |                              |
|         | By:                                                                                                  | /s/ Warner              L. Baxter |
|         | Warner              L. Baxter                                                                                  |
|         | Executive                Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial                Officer) |