alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1 

ITHE UITED STATES FEDERAL COURT 

FOR ORTHERDISTRICT OF ILLIOIS 

BORIS KHAVICH Case o. 2012-cv-04443

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

 

FIAIR O.Y., et., al., 

 Defendants, Honorable Milton Shadur

_______________________________________________________________________

OTICE OF VOLUTARY DISMISSAL OF CLAIM 

AGAIST DEFEDAT AMERICAAIRLIES IC 

_______________________________________________________________________

 OW COMES the above-named Plaintiff, BORIS KHAVICH, by his counsel 

of record, Attorney Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky of Gorokhovsky Law Offices LLC, and 

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. Pro 41(a)(1)(A)(i) hereby tenders the Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, of all claims asserted only against the above-named 

defendant AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. 

 Dated this 5th day of July 2012. 

 Respectfully submitted by 

 GOROKOHOVSKY LAW OFFICE, LLC 

 Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 BY: /s/ Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky, Esq.

 Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky, LL.M. 

 WIS SBN 1036040 

P.O. Business Address: 

6045 North Greenbay Avenue, Suite 2A 

Milwaukee, WI 54209 

(414)-581-1582 

gorlawoffice@yahoo.com 

Case: 1:12-cv-04443 Document #: 10 Filed: 10/15/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:49
# Advanced Search Report
#### 246.470-2 Quality evaluation data.

The contract administration office shall establish a system for the collection, evaluation, and use of the types of quality evaluation data specified in PGI 246.470-2.

[71 FR 27647, May 12, 2006]
# C_2019406EN.01000302.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/3

---

Assignment of Judges to Chambers

(2019/C 406/07)

At its General Meeting on 8 October 2019, the Court decided to assign Mr Jääskinen to the First and the Sixth Chambers and Mr Wahl to the Third and the Eighth Chambers.

---
#### 27.405 Other data rights provisions.
EXHIBIT 21
                          COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION
                                 SUBSIDIARIES


                                                    Jurisdiction
Name                                                     of
                                                    incorporation

Compaq Computer Australia Pty. Ltd.                  Australia
Compaq Computer Gesmbh                               Austria
Compaq Computer N.V./S.A.                            Belgium
Compaq Computer Brasil - Industria e Comercio LTDA   Brazil
Compaq Canada Incorporated/Incorporee
 (dba Compaq Canada, Inc.)                           Canada
Compaq Computer Technologies (China) Ltd.            China
Compaq Computer de Colombia S.A.                     Colombia
Compaq Computer, spol.sr.o.                          Czech Republic
Compaq Latin America Corporation                     Delaware
Compaq Computer International Corporation            Delaware
Compaq International Procurement Corporation         Delaware
NetWorth, Inc.                                       Delaware
Compaq Computer A/S                                  Denmark
Compaq Computer Oy                                   Finland
Compaq Computer S.A.R.L.                             France
Compaq Computer GmbH                                 Germany
Compaq Computer EMEA GmbH                            Germany
Compaq Computer Hong Kong Limited                    Hong Kong
Compaq Computer KFT                                  Hungary
Compaq Computer S.p.A.                               Italy
Compaq Kabushiki Kaisha                              Japan
Compaq Computer Korea Limited                        Korea
Compaq Computer (Malaysia) SDN.BHD.                  Malaysia
Compaq Computer de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.              Mexico
Compaq Computer B.V.                                 Netherlands
Compaq Computer New Zealand Limited                  New Zealand
Compaq Computer Norway A.S.                          Norway
Compaq Computer, Sp.zo.o                             Poland
Compaq Computer Portugal, Lda                        Portugal
Compaq Computer Asia Pte. Ltd.                       Singapore
Compaq Asia Pte. Limited                             Singapore
Compaq Computer Asia/Pacific Pte. Ltd.               Singapore
Compaq Computer (Proprietary) Limited                South Africa
Compaq Computer S.A.                                 Spain
Compaq Computer AB                                   Sweden
Compaq Computer AG                                   Switzerland
Compaq-Austin, Inc.                                  Texas
Compaq Computer (Thailand) Ltd.                      Thailand
Compaq Computer Taiwan Limited                       Taiwan
Compaq Computer FZE                                  United Arab Emirates
Compaq Computer Manufacturing Limited                United Kingdom
Compaq Computer Limited                              United Kingdom
Compaq Computer de Venezuela, S.A.                   Venezuela
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS )

OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND )

PENSION FUNDS, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) No. 2012 C 5090

v. )

) Judge Shadur

)

ZORAN NIKITOVIC, Individually and d/b/a/ )

Z ONE TRANSPORTATION, INC., )

an Illinois corporation not in good standing, ) Magistrate Judge Nolan

)

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR DEFAULT & JUDGMENT IN SUM CERTAIN

NOW COME the Plaintiffs, TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS OF

NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, by and through their

attorneys, JOHN J. TOOMEY, and ARNOLD AND KADJAN, and, pursuant to FRCP 55,

move for entry of an order of default and judgment in sum certain. In support of their

Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:

1. Suit was filed on June 26, 2012 for collection of delinquent ERISA

contributions, plus attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest, under 29 U.S.C. I 132(g)(2).

2. Service was made upon Zoran Nikitovic, Individually and d/b/a Z One

Transportation, Inc., an Illinois corporation not in good standing, on July 11,2012, and a

copy of the proof of service was filed with the court on July 18,2012.

3. More than 21 days have passed without any response to the Complaint by

Defendant, so that Defendant is now in default.

Case: 1:12-cv-05090 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/06/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:18
4. As supported by the attached Affidavits, the sums due on the Complaint

are:

$7,435.24 Pension

$9,174.67 Welfare

$925.00 Attorneys fees

$444.00 Court costs

$17,978.91

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for the entry of an order:

A. Finding Defendant, Zoran Nikitovic, Individually and d!b/a Z One

Transportation, Inc., an Illinois corporation not in good standing, in default;

and

B. Awarding judgment in favor ofPlaintiffs, TRUSTEES OF THE

SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE

AND PENSION FUNDS in the amount of$17,978.91.

TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS

OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND

PENSION FUNDS

s/John J. Toomey

ARNOLD AND KADJAN

203 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1650

Chicago, IL 60601

Telephone No.: (312) 236-0415

Facsimile No.: (312) 341-0438

Dated: August 6, 2012

2

Case: 1:12-cv-05090 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/06/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:19
#### Jeanne L. Long, Appellant, v. Frank H. Long, Respondent.

Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously modified by increasing the amount of alimony to $200 a week and as modified affirmed, with costs to appellant. Memorandum: In our opinion, a fair allowance for plaintiff and her children was $200 a week. (Appeal from part of a judgment of Erie Trial Term awarding plaintiff alimony and support for herself and children.) Present—Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
#### 32.103 Progress payments under construction contracts.

When satisfactory progress has not been achieved by a contractor during any period for which a progress payment is to be made, a percentage of the progress payment may be retained. Retainage should not be used as a substitute for good contract management, and the contracting officer should not withhold funds without cause. Determinations to retain and the specific amount to be withheld shall be made by the contracting officer on a case-by-case basis. Such decisions will be based on the contracting officer's assessment of past performance and the likelihood that such performance will continue. The amount of retainage withheld shall not exceed 10 percent of the approved estimated amount in accordance with the terms of the contract and may be adjusted as the contract approaches completion to recognize better than expected performance, the ability to rely on alternative safeguards, and other factors. Upon completion of all contract requirements, retained amounts shall be paid promptly.

[51 FR 19716, May 30, 1986, as amended at 60 FR 49711, Sept. 26, 1995]
## Legislation

- Section 102(b)(6) of the Fulbright-Hays Act    Word (88K)  |  PDF (87K) ;  and  22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6)

## Regulations

-  34 CFR 664
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) Parts 75, 77, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99

IFLE Home
#### 36.213-1 General.

Contracting officers shall follow the procedures for sealed bidding in part 14, as modified and supplemented by the requirements in this subpart.

[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1744, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985. Redesignated at 62 FR 272, Jan. 2, 1997]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1180

SHIRE LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SANDOZ, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in

case no. 07-CV-00197, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

ON MOTION

Before MAYER Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The American Intellectual Property Law Association moves for leave to file a brief

amicus curiae in support of Shire LLC.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

JUL 2 9 2009	

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	Keith D. Parr, Esq.

Edward H. Haug, Esq.

R. Carl Moy, Esq.

Sharon A. Israel, Esq.

U3. CORM' RIR

THE FEDERAL CIRCIAT

JUL 2 9 2009

Ma lithitiALY

cwt
Roger Cook, Esq.

Charles A. Weiss, Esq.

Kevin P. Martin, Esq.

s19

2009-1180	 2
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Tracy A. Kern, as Chief Financial Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that:(6) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.;(7) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;(8) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;(9) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e)and 15(d)-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and(10) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: September 14, 2007 /s/ Tracy A. Kern   Tracy A. Kern   Chief Financial Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
#### 243.171 Obligation or deobligation of funds.

Follow the procedures at PGI 243.171 when obligating or deobligating funds.

[70 FR 67922, Nov. 9, 2005]
Exhibit
      31.15













RULE
      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION


OF
      PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF AMEREN CORPORATION


(required
      by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I,
      Gary
      L. Rainwater, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September
      30,
      2005 of Ameren Corporation; and





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report.










Date:
      February 12, 2007









/s/
      Gary L.
      Rainwater


Gary
      L.
      Rainwater


Chairman,
      President and


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
**Program Office:** Office of School Support and Technology Programs

Transferability is a new ESEA flexibility authority that allows States and local educational agencies to transfer a portion of the funds that they receive under certain Federal programs to other specified programs that most effectively address their unique needs and to allocations for certain activities under Title I.

|Last Modified: 01/25/2005
|-------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Leslie Maize, Defendant.

Motion by defendant for assignment of counsel and to dispense with printing, denied. On the court’s own motion, the appeal from judgment of conviction, rendered July 29, 1963, dismissed. It appears that a *timely*notice of appeal was not served or filed (see Code Crim. Pro., §§ 521, 522). Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
# C_2018161EN.01000101.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 161/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 152, 30.4.2018

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 142, 23.4.2018

OJ C 134, 16.4.2018

OJ C 123, 9.4.2018

OJ C 112, 26.3.2018

OJ C 104, 19.3.2018

OJ C 94, 12.3.2018

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Dolat Ventures, Inc


Exhibit 10.1




UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF

DOLAT VENTURES, INC.

Nigar Lila, being the sole officer and a director of Dolat Ventures, Inc., do hereby consent to the following resolution.

RESOLVED, that the corporation hereby accepts the resignation of Nigal Lila as president, secretary and director of the Corporation, to become effective immediately with the appointment of Gary Tice as President, CFO and Secretary of Dolat Ventures, Inc.

RESOLVED, that the corporation hereby accepts the appointment of Gary Tice as President, CFO and Secretary of the Corporation, to become effective immediately.

CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION

I, Gary Tice, Secretary of Dolat Ventures, Inc., hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, which resolution was duly and regularly adopted by unanimous consent without a meeting of the Board of Directors on October 15, 2009.




Dated: October 15, 2009

	
	/s/ GARY TICE


	Gary Tice

Secretary




I, Nigar Lila, do hereby resign as President, CFO and Secretary and Director of Dolat Ventures, Inc., effective immediately.

	
	/s/ NIGAR LILA


	Nigar Lila




I, Gary Tice, do hereby accept my appointment as President, CFO and Secretary of Dolat Ventures, Inc., effective immediately.

	
	/s/ GARY TICE


	Gary Tice
#### GERNER, Respondent, v. BOUCK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 1, 1903.)

Action by Herman Gerner against John Bouck.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-2105

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Joshua J. Rideout, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 30, 2012

 Filed: June 5, 2012

___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Rideout, whose scheduled release date is June 13, 2012, appeals the

1

district court’s denial as unripe of his motion to modify his supervised-release

conditions. Upon careful de novo review, see Dahlen v. Shelter House, 598 F.3d

1007, 1010 (8th Cir. 2010), we conclude that Rideout’s motion was ripe, because the

enforcement of the challenged conditions was imminent at the time he filed his

December 2011 motion, and the issues raised in the motion otherwise satisfied the

requirements for ripeness. See KCCP Trust v. City of N. Kan. City, 432 F.3d 897,

See http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/LocateInmate.jsp (last consulted May 23, 1

2012).
899 (8th Cir. 2005) (ripeness doctrine is grounded in both Article III jurisdictional

limits and policy considerations of effective court administration; ripeness requires

court to evaluate both fitness of issuesfor judicial decision and hardship to parties of

withholding consideration); United States v. Thomas, 198 F.3d 1063, 1065 (8th Cir.

1999) (declining to address due process challenge to supervised-release condition

where defendant would not be subject to condition for “nearly a decade”; reasoning

that dispute was abstract “[u]ntil such time as the condition’s enforcement [was]

imminent,” but noting that defendant could petition for modification of

supervised-release conditions before his supervised release began); see also Pearson

v. Holder, 624 F.3d 682, 684-85 & n.18 (5th Cir. 2010) (where defendant’s release

from prison was “only some two years hence,” his constitutional challenge to

supervised-release condition requiring him to register as a sex offender was ripe for

adjudication; case was ripe because it was fit for judicial decision--as it was

inevitable that defendant would have to register as sex offender--and because failure

to resolve case could be harmful to defendant; noting that most cases in which

prisoners’ challenges to supervised-release conditions were held to be unripe,

including Thomas,involved situations in which remaining duration of prison sentence

was much longer).

Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the district court denying Rideout’s

motion for modification as unripe, and we remand for further consideration of the

motion. We deny as moot Rideout’s pending motion for a stay or an injunction.

______________________________

-2-
Order entered February 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01000-CV

RUSSELL D. ABEREGG, Appellant

V.

MONICA CESCHAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-00023

ORDER

The clerk’s record has been filed in the appeal. The trial court’s judgment reflects that 

the parties waived the making of a record of the June 26, 2012 hearing in this divorce case. 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50007 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Versus JORGE VARGAS-AGUILERA,, also known as Jorge Vargas-Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1423-ALL-DB

- - - - - - - - - - August 14, 2001 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Vargas-Aguilera (Vargas) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vargas has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief. Vargas, who pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, has stated that he wishes to challenge only his sentence. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses noNo. 01-50007 -2- nonfrivolous sentencing issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
#### In the Matter of Pinelawn Cemetery, Respondent, v. Caroline K. Simon et al., Constituting the Cemetery Board in the Division of Cemeteries in the Department of State of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.

Appeal from order entered on October 23, 1961 remitting the matter to the Cemetery Board for further action is dismissed, without costs *(Matter of North Amer. Holding*v. *Murdock,*6 A D 2d 596, affd. 6 N Y 2d 902). Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ. [30 Misc 2d 654.]
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-05252 Document #: 54 Filed: 08/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:850