alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019122EN.01000101.xml

| 1.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 122/01)

Last publication

OJ C 112, 25.3.2019

Past publications

OJ C 103, 18.3.2019

OJ C 93, 11.3.2019

OJ C 82, 4.3.2019

OJ C 72, 25.2.2019

OJ C 65, 18.2.2019

OJ C 54, 11.2.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 252.245-7000 Government-furnished mapping, charting, and geodesy property.

As prescribed in 245.107(2), use the following clause:

# Government-Furnished Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy Property (APR 2012)

(a) *Definition—Mapping, charting, and geodesy (MC&G) property* means geodetic, geomagnetic, gravimetric, aeronautical, topographic, hydrographic, cultural, and toponymic data presented in the form of topographic, planimetric, relief, or thematic maps and graphics; nautical and aeronautical charts and publications; and in simulated, photographic, digital, or computerized formats.

(b) The Contractor shall not duplicate, copy, or otherwise reproduce MC&G property for purposes other than those necessary for performance of the contract.

(c) At the completion of performance of the contract, the Contractor, as directed by the Contracting Officer, shall either destroy or return to the Government all Government-furnished MC&G property not consumed in the performance of this contract.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 74 FR 37648, July 29, 2009; 76 FR 6006, Feb. 2, 2011; 77 FR 23632, Apr. 20, 2012; 85 FR 53683, Aug. 31, 2020]
## Legislation

- Title III, Part A, Section 318 of the HEA, as amended  

## Regulations

- Currently, there are no program-specific regulations.
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98 and 99.

Institutional Service Home
225.772-3 Procedures. ( a ) ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall not award to any source that is a foreign satellite service provider or is offering satellite services provided by a foreign entity if such award presents an unacceptable cybersecurity risk, as determined by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment or the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy.
( 2 ) When procuring commercial satellite services from a foreign entity, the contracting officer shall review the exclusion records in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as required at FAR 9.405, to ensure that an entity identified in, or otherwise known to be involved in, the otherwise successful offer is not listed as ineligible in the SAM database (see FAR 9.405).
( b ) If an offeror discloses information in accordance with paragraph (c) of the provision 252.225-7049, Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Foreign Commercial Satellite Services—Representations, the contracting officer— ( 1 ) Shall forward the information regarding the offeror through agency channels to the address at PGI 225.772-3; and
( 2 ) Shall not award to that offeror, unless an exception is determined to apply in accordance with 225.772-4.
( c ) ( 1 ) If the otherwise successful offeror provides negative responses to all representations in the provision at 252.225-7049, the contracting officer may rely on the representations, unless the contracting officer has an independent reason to question the representations.
( 2 ) If the contracting officer has an independent reason to question a negative representation of the otherwise successful offeror, the contracting officer shall consult with the office specified in PGI 225.772-3, prior to deciding whether to award to that offeror.
[79 FR 45664, Aug. 5, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 66073, Dec. 21, 2018]
# C_2018466EN.01001101.xml

| 28.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 December 2018

(2018/C 466/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1377 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,14 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4672 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90073 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2725 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1279 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 133,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9698 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,858 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 321,56 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2945 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6536 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,0067 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6161 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5500 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9109 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6964 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5617 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 276,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,5208 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8109 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4125 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 608,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7419 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,991 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 78,8767 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,026 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4786 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,6283 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,9445 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1377

JPY

Japanese yen

126,14

DKK

Danish krone

7,4672

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90073

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2725

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1279

ISK

Iceland króna

133,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9698

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,858

HUF

Hungarian forint

321,56

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2945

RON

Romanian leu

4,6536

TRY

Turkish lira

6,0067

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6161

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5500

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9109

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6964

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5617

KRW

South Korean won

1 276,84

ZAR

South African rand

16,5208

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8109

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4125

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 608,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7419

PHP

Philippine peso

59,991

RUB

Russian rouble

78,8767

THB

Thai baht

37,026

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4786

MXN

Mexican peso

22,6283

INR

Indian rupee

79,9445

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Amanda Amann is a Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory Services and has served in that role since July 2016. Ms. Amann joined the U.S. Department of Education, Office of the General Counsel in July 2012.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Home |
|                                                   |

                - 2018 Hurricane Relief - PL 109-148 Excerpts Redlines - Aug 2018  (MS Word, 54KB)
                - 2018 Hurricane Relief - PL 109-148 Accessible Redline Version  (MS Word, 56KB)
                - 2018 Hurricane Relief - PL 109-148 Clean  (MS Word, 52KB)

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2020

                - Project Abstracts:     MS Word  (23K)

## FY 2019

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2018

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2017

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2016

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2015

                - Project Abstracts:     PDF  (124K)

## FY 2014

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2013

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2012

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2011

                - No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2010

                - Project Abstract:     MS Word  (32K) |  PDF  (144K)

FY 2010 was the first year of funding for this program.

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Mark A. Severson
    ----------------------------------------
    Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer

May 4, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### NOONE, Respondent, v. UTICA & M. V. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 1, 1903.)

Action by Maria Noone against the Utica & Mohawk Valley Railway Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, upon the facts. Held, that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence.
#### 2832.903 Responsibilities.

The HCA or designee is responsible for promulgating policies and procedures to implement FAR subpart 32.9.
#### 2052.216-73 Accelerated task order procedures.

As prescribed at 2016.506-70(b), the contracting officer may insert the following clause in applicable solicitations and contracts that contain task order procedures. This clause may be altered to fit the circumstances of the requirement.

# Accelerated Task Order Procedures (JAN 1993)

(a) The NRC may require the contractor to begin work before receiving a definitized task order from the contracting officer. Accordingly, when the contracting officer verbally authorizes the work, the contractor shall proceed with performance of the task order subject to the monetary limitation established for the task order by the contracting officer.

(b) When this accelerated procedure is employed by the NRC, the contractor agrees to begin promptly negotiating with the contracting officer the terms of the definitive task order and agrees to submit a cost proposal with supporting cost or pricing data. If agreement on a definitized task order is not reached by the target date mutually agreed upon by the contractor and contracting officer, the contracting officer may determine a reasonable price and/or fee in accordance with subpart 15.8 and part 31 of the FAR, subject to contractor appeal as provided in 52.233-1, Disputes. In any event, the contractor shall proceed with completion of the task order subject only to the monetary limitation established by the contracting officer and the terms and conditions of the basic contract.

(End of clause)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODERICK WILLIAMS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-97-41-3, CA-99-3-4) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Roderick Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Roderick Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Williams , Nos. CR-97-41-3; CA-99-3-4 (E.D. Va.Sept. 22 & Oct. 25, 1999). We deny leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 1:12-cv-04164 Document #: 5 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:9
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Draft National Mall plan,environmental impact statement [electronic resource]: the National Mall,Washington D.C.**
 
Plan | Maps (zip)
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.79/6:N 21/DRAFT
Item Number:0651-B-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000682301
 
January 15, 2020
Exhibit 23.

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Wegener Corporation
Duluth, Georgia

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statements (File No. 33-45390,  No. 33-42007,  No. 333-08017,  No. 33-27527, No.
333-29887, No. 33-51205 and No. 333-29889) of our reports dated October 27, 1999
relating  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of Wegener
Corporation and  Subsidiaries  appearing in the Company's  Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 3, 1999.


Atlanta, Georgia                                          BDO Seidman, LLP
November 22, 1999
#### 3052.217-93 Subcontracts (USCG).

As prescribed in USCG guidance at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3017.9000(a) and (b), insert the following clause:

# Subcontracts (DEC 2003)

(a) Nothing contained in the contract shall be construed as creating any contractual relationship between any subcontractor and the Government. The divisions or sections of the specifications are not intended to control the Contractor in dividing the work among subcontractors or to limit the work performed by any trade.

(b) The Contractor shall be responsible to the Government for acts and omissions of its own employees, and of subcontractors and their employees. The Contractor shall also be responsible for the coordination of the work of the trades, subcontractors, and material men.

(c) The Contractor shall, without additional expense to the Government, employ specialty subcontractors where required by the specifications.

(d) The Government or its representatives will not undertake to settle any differences between the Contractor and its subcontractors, or between subcontractors.

(End of clause)
# C_2017315EN.01000201.xml

| 22.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 September 2017

(2017/C 315/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1905 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4407 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5135 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1585 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3025 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,083 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,61 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2805 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5988 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1776 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5002 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4712 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2910 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6268 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6100 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 349,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,8889 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8480 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4828 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 889,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9977 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,739 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,0220 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,441 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7353 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2250 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,1495 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1905

JPY

Japanese yen

133,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4407

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88240

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5135

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1585

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3025

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,083

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,61

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2805

RON

Romanian leu

4,5988

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1776

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5002

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4712

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2910

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6268

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6100

KRW

South Korean won

1 349,47

ZAR

South African rand

15,8889

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8480

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4828

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 889,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9977

PHP

Philippine peso

60,739

RUB

Russian rouble

69,0220

THB

Thai baht

39,441

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7353

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2250

INR

Indian rupee

77,1495

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
The Certified Administrative Record posted on this page was filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities v. Arne Duncan and the United States Department of Education, Case No. 11-CV-01314.  The file format and organization of the Certified Administrative Record posted here is identical to that filed with the Court.

Please contact Luke Glisan at (202) 401-6001 should you have questions regarding the contents of this Administrative Record.

**Downloads**

- Index: Gainful Employment Administrative Recordsdownload filesPDF (53K)
- Gainful Employment Administrative Record (part 1)download filesZIPPED (128M)
- Gainful Employment Administrative Record (part 2)download filesZIPPED (1.87G)
- Gainful Employment Administrative Record (part 3)download filesZIPPED (425M)

|Last Modified: 11/18/2011
|-------------------------
SERVED JULY 2,2010 

II U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIC^" 

11 OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

(i WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ISLAND HELICOPTERS INTERNATIONAL, LTD. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP08SO0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2008-0693 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER 

ON JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE 

ERRATUM 

The service date should read "JULY 1, 2010". 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP08SO0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014' 

ONE COPY 

Bradley P. Hanger, President 

Island Helicopters International 

P.O. Box 2900 

East End, Tortola 

British Virgin Islands, West Indies 

TEL: (284)495-2538 

FAX: (954)359-3213 

Raymond Veatch, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Coimsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: (404)305-5200 

FAX: (404)305-5223 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor 

Room E12-358 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: (202)366-2132 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.