alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018294EN.01000101.xml

| 20.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2018/C 294/01)

Last publication

OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.

Past publications

OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.

OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.

OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.

OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.

OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.

OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 31.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart describes the applicability of the cost principles and procedures in succeeding subparts of this part to various types of contracts and subcontracts. It also describes the need for advance agreements.
#### 252.235-7002 Animal welfare.

As prescribed in 235.072(a), use the following clause:

# Animal Welfare (DEC 2014)

(a)(1) The Contractor shall register its research, development, test, and evaluation or training facility with the Secretary of Agriculture in accordance with 7 U.S.C. 2136 and 9 CFR subpart C, and section 2.30, unless otherwise exempt from this requirement by meeting the conditions in 7 U.S.C. 2136 and 9 CFR parts 1 through 4 for the duration of the activity. The Contractor shall have its proposed animal use approved in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 3216.01, Use of Animals in DoD Programs, by a DoD Component Headquarters Oversight Office. The Contractor shall furnish evidence of such registration and approval to the Contracting Officer before beginning work under this contract.

(2) The Contractor shall make its animals, and all premises, facilities, vehicles, equipment, and records that support animal care available during business hours and at other times mutually agreeable to the Contractor and the United States Department of Agriculture Office of Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA/APHIS) representative, personnel representing the DoD component oversight offices, as well as the Contracting Officer, to ascertain that the Contractor is compliant with 7 U.S.C. 2131-2159 and 9 CFR parts 1 through 4.

(b) The Contractor shall acquire animals in accordance with DoDI 3216.01, current at time of award (*http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/321601p.pdf*).

(c) The Contractor agrees that the care and use of animals will conform with the pertinent laws of the United States, regulations of the Department of Agriculture, and policies and procedures of the Department of Defense (see 7 U.S.C. 2131 *et seq.,* and 9 CFR subchapter A, parts 1 through 4, DoDI 3216.01, Army Regulation 40-33/SECNAVINST 3900.38C/AFMAN 40-401(I)/DARPAINST 18/USUHSINST 3203). The Contractor shall also comply with DoDI 1322.24, Medical Readiness Training, if this contract includes acquisition of training.

(d) The Contracting Officer may immediately suspend, in whole or in part, work and further payments under this contract for failure to comply with the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (c) of this clause.

(1) The suspension will stay in effect until the Contractor complies with the requirements.

(2) Failure to complete corrective action within the time specified by the Contracting Officer may result in termination of this contract and, if applicable, removal of the Contractor's name from the approved vendor list for live animals used in medical training.

(e) The Contractor may request registration of its facility by contacting USDA/APHIS/AC, 4700 River Road, Unit 84, Riverdale, MD 20737-1234, or via the APHIS Animal Care Web site at: *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/animalwelfare.*

(f) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (f), in all subcontracts involving research, development, test, and evaluation or training that use live vertebrate animals.

[79 FR 73501, Dec. 11, 2014]
## Annual Performance Report

Grantees are required to submit an Annual Performance Report (APR) annually; the collection number is OMB 1840-0766. The APR is available to grantees October 1 of each calendar year, and closes 90 days thereafter. To review the reporting requirement for Title III and Title V Programs request access to an interactive training site under the training tab located on the Information Management Performance System Portal at https://apr.ed.gov.  Once here you may select the requirements for each Title III and Title V program based on the institutional type (two-year or four-year).  This site is also available to grantees for training purposes and includes an APR user's manual.

To gain access to the APR at https://apr.ed.gov, project directors need the institution's Unit ID, PR Award ID, and a unique password provided by the Institutional Service. Passwords are e-mailed to all grantee project directors designated on the grant award notification document 30 days before the collection period begins. Project directors of Title III and Title V grants are responsible for completing and managing the content of their respective annual report. During the data collection, assistance is available via a Help Desk to answer questions related to system operations, error messages, technical problems, report content, and program policy.

**Note:** If you are a project director and have responsibility for completing the annual report for your institution, please be sure you are designated on the official grant award notification and your e-mail and telephone number are listed correctly in the GAPS database.

## Final Performance Report

The online system will generate a final report from grantees’ individual annual reports for each grant ending September 30 of the collection period.  The online system generates the final performance so that reported data is consistent throughout the life cycle of grants and eliminates each grantee’s burden of having to compile a final report.



Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 03/04/2011
|-------------------------
#### 2822.406-8 Investigations.

The contracting officer shall prepare and forward reports of violations under FAR 22.406-8(d)(1) to the HCA or designee at a level at or above the BPC. That official shall be responsible for processing the report in accordance with FAR 22.406-8(d)(2).
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Communications and Outreach Home |
|                                            |

 

ED is responsible for administering U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools.  ED-GRS is authorized by the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. 3402 (2) and (3).

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
No. 7988.

#### The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. *v.*Miller.

(Decided October 6, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Richland county.

*Mr. J. E. Collins*and *Messrs. Cummings, McBride. é Wolfe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. T. Manner*and *Mr. J. M. Reed,*for defendant- in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck, Price and¡ Crew, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 38 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 38

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation 
   of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Partial Approval and Partial 
      Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans and Federal 
      Implementation Plan; Utah; Revisions to Regional Haze State 
 Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional Haze''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2017

  Mr. Lee (for himself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
Protection Agency relating to ``Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation 
   of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Partial Approval and Partial 
      Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans and Federal 
      Implementation Plan; Utah; Revisions to Regional Haze State 
 Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional Haze''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation 
Plans; Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality 
Implementation Plans and Federal Implementation Plan; Utah; Revisions 
to Regional Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan 
for Regional Haze'' (81 Fed. Reg. 43894 (July 5, 2016)), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
1

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3838

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Edward Walter Kelley, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 5, 2007

Filed: January 11, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Edward Walter Kelley pleaded guilty to an indictment charging that he

knowingly conspired with several named individuals to knowingly manufacture 50

grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.

Kelley appeals his 120-month prison sentence, arguing that the district court1

 clearly

erred by attributing 50 grams of methamphetamine to him based on drugs seized from

his co-conspirators. We disagree. By pleading guilty without reservation, Kelley

admitted the facts alleged in the indictment. See United States v. White, 408 F.3d
-2-

399, 402 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 674 (2005). Further, the uncontested

factual allegations in the presentence report indicate that nearly all of the drugs

attributed to Kelley were seized from one of the named co-conspirators who was

manufacturing methamphetamine with Kelley during that period, and who told

officers the seized precursor drug was to be used to manufacture methamphetamine.

See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) & comment. (n.2) (in jointly undertaken criminal

activity, offense level is based on defendant’s conduct and others’ reasonably

foreseeable conduct in furtherance of criminal activity defendant agreed to jointly

undertake). Thus, we conclude the district court did not clearly err in holding Kelley

responsible for 50 grams of methamphetamine, see United States v. Zimmer, 299

F.3d 710, 720-21 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), which quantity subjected him

to the 120-month statutory minimum, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) (10-year

minimum for 50 grams or more of methamphetamine). 

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 12.3

               SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (CONSOLIDATED)
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                 FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
                            (Thousands Except Ratio)
                                   (Unaudited)


Operating Income                                                      $ 143,776

Adjustments:
  Income taxes                                                           37,683
  Provision for deferred income taxes                                     7,171
  Deferred investment tax credits                                        (4,679)
  Other income and deductions                                             1,574
  Allowance for borrowed and equity funds
    used during construction                                              1,940
  Interest portion of financing leases                                    1,252
                                                                       --------
        Earnings                                                      $ 188,717
                                                                       ========

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                                           $ 41,160
  Amortization of debt issuance cost                                      3,502
  Other interest                                                          6,050
  Interest portion of financing leases                                    1,252
                                                                       --------

        Fixed Charges                                                  $ 51,964
                                                                       ========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                         3.63
                                                                       ========
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MAURICE LAND,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 143, 2021

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1408007675A (S)

§

§

§

 Submitted: August 30, 2021

 Decided: November 5, 2021

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s 

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below 

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the Superior 

Court’s April 15, 2021 order denying the appellant’s second motion for 

postconviction relief. The appellant’s re-packaging and re-litigation of surveillance 

video claims that were raised before and during trial did not constitute new evidence 

creating a strong inference of his actual innocence.

1

 

1 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(2)(i) (providing that a second or subsequent motion for postconviction 

relief will be summarily dismissed unless the movant was convicted after trial and pleads with 

particularity new evidence creating a strong inference of actual innocence).
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
Exhibit 10.32

FIRST AMENDMENT TOEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This Amendment Number One, dated as of May 23, 2000, to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of November 18, 1998 (the "Agreement") among US Airways Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, US Airways, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Rakesh Gangwal (the "Executive") is entered into as of the date first stated above.

WHEREAS, the Board believes it is important to diminish the inevitable distraction of the Executive by virtue of the personal uncertainties and risks created by a pending or threatened change of control of the Company and
to encourage the Executive's full attention and dedication to the Company currently and in the event of any threatened or pending change of control, and to provide the Executive with compensation and benefits arrangements upon a change of control which
ensure that the compensation and benefits expectations of the Executive will be satisfied; and

WHEREAS, the Board believes it to be in the best interests of the Company to amend the Agreement to achieve the aforementioned objectives;

NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendment is hereby made to the Agreement:

1.  Section 1(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended by inserting, after the phrase "third anniversary of such date" in clause (1) thereof, the following:



"(or, in the event of the occurrence of a Change of Control under Section 2(c) below, the third anniversary of the consummation of the reorganization, merger or consolidation the shareholder
approval of which constituted a Change of Control)."



| | EXECUTIVE                            
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | /s/ Rakesh Gangwal                   
| | Rakesh Gangwal                       
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |                                      
| | US AIRWAYS, INC.                     
| |                                      
| | /s/ Jennifer C. McGarey              
| | Jennifer C. McGarey                  
| | Secretary and Assistant General      
| | Counsel                              
| |                                      
| | US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.               
| |                                      
| | /s/ Jennifer C. McGarey              
| | Jennifer C. McGarey                  
| | Secretary
#### 2432.704 Limitation of cost or funds.
exhibit_10-1.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

    


    October
28, 2009

    


    Stephen
J. Turner

    34620 SE
Curtis Road

    Snoqualmie,
WA 98065

    


    Richard
M. Levy

    12118 SE
21st

    Bellevue,
WA 98005

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    This
letter confirms our agreement with respect to your employment with SCOLR Pharma,
Inc. (the “Company”).  The Company has entered into employment
agreements with each of you dated April 14, 2008 (“Employment
Agreements”).  Except as specifically modified hereby, the terms and
conditions of the Employment Agreements shall remain in full force and
effect.

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              Notwithstanding
      the provisions of Section 4.1 of the Employment Agreements, effective
      November 1, 2009, you agree to accept a reduction in cash compensation for
      performance of your duties to the Company to a rate of $175,000 per
      year.  For all other purposes of your respective employment
      agreements, the amount of the “Base Salary” shall continue as set forth in
      your individual Employment
Agreement.

            


    

     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              In
      connection with the execution of this letter agreement, the Company has
      granted each of you vested options to purchase 500,000 shares of the
      Company’s common stock under the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive
      Plan.

            


    

     

    
      	
              3.  

            	
              The
      Company has agreed that all stock options granted to you under the 2004
      Equity Incentive Plan or 1995 Stock Option Plan, including options granted
      after this date, shall be exercisable for two years after termination of
      your employment with the Company (for any reason), provided, however, that
      no such stock options shall be exercisable beyond their scheduled
      expiration date.

            


    

    


    Please
confirm your agreement with the foregoing by signing a copy of this letter
below.

    


    Regards,

    SCOLR
Pharma, Inc.

    


    /s/
Michael N. Taglich

    Michael
N. Taglich

    Chairman
of the Board

    


    Accepted
and Agreed this 2nd day
of November, 2009

    


    


    /s/ Stephen J.
Turner

    Stephen
J. Turner

    


    


    /s/ Richard M.
Levy

    Richard
M. Levy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL 1999 AS FILED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          98,278
<SECURITIES>                                    43,968
<RECEIVABLES>                                  159,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,038
<INVENTORY>                                    200,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               544,811
<PP&E>                                         371,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 754,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,976
<COMMON>                                       410,068
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   754,773
<SALES>                                        473,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               473,690
<CGS>                                          312,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  312,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,980)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,456)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,456)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)


</TABLE>