alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Index | Site       Map | FAQ | Facility       Info | Reading       Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact UsProtecting People and the EnvironmentUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -   About NRC    - The     Commission 
  - Statutory Authority 
  - Strategic Plan 
  - Budget &      Performance 
  - Organization & Functions 
  - Locations 
  - History 
  - Values 
  - Policymaking 
  - Radiation Protection 
  - Fire Protection 
  - How We Regulate 
  - Grants 
  - Civil Rights 
  - 
- NuclearReactors    - Operating Reactor Locations 
  - Reactor Quick Links 
  - Power Reactors 
  - Research and Test     Reactors 
  - Operating Reactors 
  - Operator Licensing 
  - New Reactors 
  - Operator     Licensing for New Reactors 
  - Reactor Safety Research 
  - Advisory Comm (ACRS) 
  - Decommissioning     of Nuclear Facilities 
  - 
- NuclearMaterials    - Fuel Cycle Facility Locations 
  - Uranium     Recovery Locations 
  - Materials Quick Links 
  - Special Nuclear Material 
  - Source Material 
  - Byproduct Material 
  - Med, Academic & Ind Uses 
  - Source Materials Facilities 
  - Uranium Recovery 
  - Fuel Cycle Facilities 
  - Materials     Transportation 
  - Materials Research 
  - Advisory Comm (ACMUI) 
  - Decommissioning     of Nuclear Facilities 
  - Materials     Environmental Reviews 
  - 
- RadioactiveWaste    - Waste Quick Links 
  - Low-Level Waste 
  - Waste Incidental to     Reprocessing 
  - Incidental Waste Criteria 
  - High-Level Waste 
  - Uranium Mill Tailings 
  - LLW Disposal 
  - HLW Disposal 
  - Spent Fuel Storage 
  - Spent Fuel Transport 
  - Waste Research 
  - 
- NuclearSecurity    - Security     Spotlight 
  - NRC     Responsibilities 
  - Domestic Safeguards 
  - Radioactive Material Security 
  - Facility Protection 
  - Nuclear Material Control 
  - International Safeguards 
  - Information Security 
  - Emergency     Preparedness 
  - &; 
- Public Meetings&   Involvement    - Public Meeting Schedule 
  - Commission     Schedule 
  - Conferences & Symposia 
  - Documents for Comment 
  - Brochures & Fact Sheets 
  - Involving Stakeholders 
  - Info Quality Guidelines 
  - Rulemaking Process 
  - Licensing 
  - Enforcement 
  - Hearing Process 
  - Hearing Applications 
  - 

Home       > Electronic Reading       Room       > Document       Collections       > NUREG-Series       Publications       > Staff       Reports >       NUREG-1936
Draft Environmental Impact Statement       for the Combined License (COL) for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit       3 - Draft Report for Comment (NUREG-1936) File Title Volume             1Cover through Chapter 10 Volume             2Appendices A–M   
Privacy Policy | Site       DisclaimerThursday, April 15, 2010
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-30117

Summary Calendar

JOHNNY R. VINSON

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana]

(95-CV-2216)

May 26, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Appellant Vinson appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment for Appellee General Electric Company. We affirm.

Vinson sued his employer, General Electric Company, under

Title VII alleging that it discharged him because he had testified

in a discrimination case brought years earlier by a co- employee.2

General Electric moved for summary judgment conte nding that

Vinson’s claim was time barred and that he had been fired for poor

job performance and not because of his earlier testimony. The

district court agreed on both grounds.

42 U.S.C. § 2000-5(e) requires that as a prerequisite to suit

an employee must file a discrimination charge with the EEOC within

180 days of the unlawful conduct. This period begins to run from

the date the employee is given notice of dismis s al. It is

undisputed that the EEOC charge was not filed within that period.

Vinson argues that he is entitled to an extension of that period,

but the reasons he advances do not comply with any of the

excep tions recognized by this court in B arrow v. New Orleans

Steamship Assn. , 932 F.2d 473, 478 (5th Cir. 1991). The district

court did not err in finding the claim time barred.

Even if the claim was not time barred, the district court’s

alternative basis for it s grant of summary judgment is correct.

Appellant has not created an issue of material fact on the question

of his testimony in the prior case being the ca use of the

discharge.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2019002EN.01000101.xml

| 4.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 January 2019

Euro exchange rates (2)

3 January 2019

(2019/C 2/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1348 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4675 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90312 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2808 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1219 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 133,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,9113 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,683 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 322,41 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2975 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6660 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,2248 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6287 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5392 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8884 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7085 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5501 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 279,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4149 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8019 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4325 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 352,47 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7020 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,679 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 78,2615 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,518 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2814 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,2384 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,6080 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1348

JPY

Japanese yen

122,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4675

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90312

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2808

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1219

ISK

Iceland króna

133,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,9113

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,683

HUF

Hungarian forint

322,41

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2975

RON

Romanian leu

4,6660

TRY

Turkish lira

6,2248

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6287

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5392

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8884

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7085

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5501

KRW

South Korean won

1 279,17

ZAR

South African rand

16,4149

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8019

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4325

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 352,47

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7020

PHP

Philippine peso

59,679

RUB

Russian rouble

78,2615

THB

Thai baht

36,518

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2814

MXN

Mexican peso

22,2384

INR

Indian rupee

79,6080

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 252.216-7004 Award Fee Reduction or Denial for Jeopardizing the Health or Safety of Government Personnel.

As prescribed in 216.406(e) use the following clause:

# Award Fee Reduction or Denial for Jeopardizing the Health or Safety of Government Personnel (SEP 2011)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Covered incident*—

(i) Means any incident in which the Contractor, through a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding that results in a disposition listed in paragraph (a)(ii) of this definition—

(A) Has been determined in the performance of this contract to have caused serious bodily injury or death of any civilian or military personnel of the Government through gross negligence or with reckless disregard for the safety of such personnel; or

(B) Has been determined to be liable for actions of a subcontractor of the Contractor that caused serious bodily injury or death of any civilian or military personnel of the Government through gross negligence or with reckless disregard for the safety of such personnel.

(ii) Includes those incidents that have resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(A) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(B) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault or liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damage of $5,000 or more.

(C) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in—

(*1*) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(*2*) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(D) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (a)(ii)

(B), or (a)(ii)(C).

(E) In a DoD investigation of the Contractor or its subcontractors at any tier not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. courts, a final determination by the Secretary of Defense of Contractor or subcontractor fault (see DFARS 216.405-2-70.

*Serious bodily injury* means a grievous physical harm that results in a permanent disability.

(b) If, in the performance of this contract, the Contractor's or its subcontractor's actions cause serious bodily injury or death of civilian or military Government personnel, the Government may reduce or deny the award fee for the period in which the covered incident occurred, including the recovery of all or part of any award fees paid for any previous period during which the covered incident occurred.

(End of clause)

[76 FR 57677, Sept. 16, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 49181, Sept. 28, 2018]
|   | 1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |        March 11, 2009 |   | /s/      G. Anthony Busseni               |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                       |   | G.      Anthony Busseni                        |   |
|   |                       |   | President      and CEO                         |   |
|   |                       |   |                                           |   |
|   |                       |   |                                           |   |
|   |                       |   |                                           |   |
| Date:  |        March 11, 2009 |   | /s/      C. Douglas Carpenter             |   |
|   |                       |   | C.      Douglas Carpenter                      |   |
|   |                       |   | Senior      Vice President, Secretary, and CFO |   |

----
Exhibit 10.50

May 18, 1999







Lawrence M. Nagin


Executive Vice President - Corporate


  Affairs and General Counsel


US Airways, Inc.


2345 Crystal Drive


Arlington, VA 22227



Dear Larry:



Reference is made to the letter agreement dated February 6, 1996 (the "SERP Letter Agreement") between you and US Airways, Inc. ("US Airways") concerning supplemental retirement benefits to be paid to you upon your
retirement from US Airways. This letter, when countersigned by you will constitute an amendment to the SERP Letter Agreement. This amendment has been approved by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of US Airways, Inc. at its meeting on
May 18, 1999. US Airways hereby agrees with you that clause (ii) of Section 1(a) of the Letter Agreement shall be amended, effective as of the date hereof, to read as follows:



"(ii) final average earnings under the Retirement Plan in an amount based on your actual base salary plus an assumed bonus in the maximum amount of (a) 70% of your base salary in respect to years prior to 1998; and (b)
120% of your base salary in respect to years thereafter (or such greater maximum bonus percentage applicable to you under the annual Incentive Compensation Plan of US Airways in which you participate)".



In all other respects, the SERP Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.









Mr. Lawrence M. Nagin


May 18, 1999


Page 2





If you concur in the foregoing, please indicate your agreement by signing a copy of this letter in the space provided below.





| | US Airways, Inc.                       
| | ---------------------------------------
| |                                        
| | /s/ Michelle V. Bryan                  
| | Michelle V. Bryan                      
| | Senior Vice President - Human Resources
| |                                        
| | /s/ Lawrence M. Nagin                  
| | Lawrence M. Nagin
315.208 Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals. ( b ) In addition to the provision in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition, if the head of the contracting activity (HCA) determines that biomedical or behavioral research and development (R&D) acquisitions are subject to conditions other than those specified in FAR 52.215-1(c)(3), the HCA may authorize for use in competitive solicitations for R&D, the provision at 352.215-70, Late Proposals and Revisions. This is an authorized FAR deviation. ( 2 ) When the provision at 352.215-70 is included in the solicitation and if the HCA intends to consider a proposal or proposals received after the exact time specified for receipt, the contracting officer, with the assistance of cost or technical personnel as appropriate, shall determine in writing that the proposal(s) meets the requirements of the provision at 352.215-70.
#### 3035.70-1 Policy.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) desires widespread dissemination of the results of funded non-sensitive research. The Contractor, therefore, may publish (subject to the provisions of the “Data Rights” and “Patent Rights” clauses of the contract) research results in professional journals, books, trade publications, or other appropriate media.

[77 FR 50635, Aug. 22, 2012]
IA 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 126 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation relating to ‘‘Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk 

Management for Large Financial Institutions’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2024 

Mrs. HOUCHIN (for herself, Mr. HILL, and Mr. DONALDS) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 

Services 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation relating to 

‘‘Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Deposit Insurance Corporation relating to ‘‘Principles 

5 for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for 

6 Large Financial Institutions’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 74183; pubVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:34 Apr 05, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ126.IH HJ126

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 126 IH 

1 lished October 30, 2023), and such rule shall have no force 

2 or effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### 34.005 General requirements.
#### In the Matter of the City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for a Park Within the Block Bounded by East 58th Street and Other Streets in the Borough of Brooklyn. Frances P. Headley et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding to condemn certain real property, the claimants with respect to Damage Parcel No. 1 appeal from so much of a final decree of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 11, 1963 upon the court’s oral decision after a nonjury trial, as awarded them $2,650 for said parcel. Claimants contend that such award is inadequate. Decree modified on the law and the facts by increasing the award from $2,650 to $3,360. As so modified, decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to appellants. Findings of fact made by the court below which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. There is no competent evidence in the record, upon which the trial court could have properly fixed the amount of the award at less than the lowest valuation of the expert witnesses (cf. *Matter of City of New York [A. & W. Realty Corp.],*1 N Y 2d 428, 432-433). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, J J., concur.
#### 253.209 Contractor qualifications.
#### W. S. Buffham and another *vs.*Andrew L. Perkins and Garnishee.

April 16, 1890.

Municipal Court — Vacating Judgment after Transcript Filed__The municipal court of the city of St. Paul has the authority, upon a proper showing, to vacate and set aside its judgments after transcripts thereof have been filed in, and executions issued out of, the district court, as provided and required by Sp. Laws 1889, o. 351, § 3.

On September 21,1889, plaintiffs recovered judgment (for $107.28) by default in the municipal court of St. Paul against Hattie T. Stone, and Stone & Co., as garnishees of the defendant Perkins. On September 23d, transcripts were issued and filed in the district court for Ramsey county, and executions issued from that court. On October 5th, on application of Hattie T. Stone, the municipal court made an order vacating the judgment against her, and requiring her to make disclosure on October 12th, and an order enjoining the sheriff from enforcing the execution against her. From these orders the plaintiffs appeal.

*W. F. Carroll,*for appellants.

*M. D. Munn,*for respondent.

Collins, J.

As that part of the order of the municipal court bearing date October 3, 1889, which restrained the sheriff of Ramsey county and his deputies from further proceeding under the execution issued in this action, had by its own terms ceased to be of force or effect several days prior to the taking of this appeal, we do not deem it necessary to pass upon the alleged error of the court in this respect.

*159The only remaining question of any moment whatever is that of the jurisdiction of the municipal court of the city of St. Paul over its judgments — its right to vacate or modify them, after transcripts have been filed in the district court, and executions issued therefrom, as provided by section 3 (p. 995) of the amendatory act, (Sp. Laws 1889, c. 351,) which deprived the court in question of the power, previously exercised under Gen. St. 1878, c. 64, § 96, to enforce its judgments by execution until such time as transcripts were filed in district court, and the judgments became liens upon real estate, and which granted to the last-named court the exclusive right to issue executions upon judgments of the municipal court, to be issued only after transcripts had been filed. It was determined in *Crosby*v. *Farmer,*39 Minn. 305, (40 N. W. Rep. 71,) under the law as it existed before the amendment of 1889, that, notwithstanding a transcript had been filed in the district court, and it alone had the authority to enforce the collection of a judgment of this same municipal court by execution, the judgment was that of the latter court for all purposes except that of compelling its payment by execution. The municipal court, therefore, retained control over, and could vacate and set aside, its judgments, upon a proper showing. The amendment of 1889 has not changed the law upon this point, and the views of the court as expressed in *Crosby*v. *Farmer*are pertinent and applicable here.

Both orders affirmed.
3417.104 General. ( b ) The Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 17.104(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 88

    Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of State in 
coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury should investigate the 
use of cryptocurrencies by Hamas (also known as Harakat al-Muqawama al-
  Islamiya), and whether any cryptocurrencies were exchanged between 
         Hamas and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2024

 Mr. Burchett submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of State in 
coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury should investigate the 
use of cryptocurrencies by Hamas (also known as Harakat al-Muqawama al-
  Islamiya), and whether any cryptocurrencies were exchanged between 
         Hamas and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Secretary of State in coordination with the Secretary of the 
Treasury should investigate the use of cryptocurrencies by Hamas (also 
known as Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya), and whether any 
cryptocurrencies were exchanged between Hamas and the United Nations 
Relief and Works Agency.
                                 <all>
```