alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
32.009-1 General. ( a ) ( 1 ) Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3903(a), agencies other than the Department of Defense (DoD) shall provide accelerated payments, to the fullest extent permitted by law, with a goal of 15 days after receipt of a proper invoice and all other required documentation, if a specific payment date is not established by contract, to— ( i ) Small business contractors; and
( ii ) Prime contractors that subcontract with a small business concern, if the prime contractor agrees to make payments to the small business subcontractor within 15 days of receiving the accelerated payment from the Government, after receipt of a proper invoice and all other required documentation from the small business subcontractor, to the maximum extent practicable, without any further consideration from or fees charged to the subcontractor.
( 2 ) Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 3801(b), DoD shall provide accelerated payments, to the fullest extent permitted by law, with a goal of 15 days after receipt of a proper invoice and all other required documentation, to— ( i ) Small business contractors; and
( ii ) Prime contractors that subcontract with a small business concern, if the prime contractor agrees to make payments to the small business subcontractor within 15 days of receiving the accelerated payment from the Government, after receipt of a proper invoice and all other required documentation from the small business subcontractor, to the maximum extent practicable, without any further consideration from or fees charged to the subcontractor.
( b ) This acceleration does not provide any new rights under the Prompt Payment Act and does not affect the application of the Prompt Payment Act late payment interest provisions.
( c ) Agencies may use the Governmentwide commercial purchase card as a method of payment (see 32.1108) to facilitate accelerated payment, to earn refunds, and to reduce invoice processing costs.
[88 FR 9733, Feb. 14, 2023]
#### 2807.104 General procedures.
#### 305.7001 Scope.

Pursuant to appropriations acts, this subpart prescribes requirements for posting presolicitation and award notices for actions funded in whole or in part from the Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF). The requirements of this subpart enhance transparency to the public.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Chattem, Inc., a Tennessee corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2005 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  July  6, 2005                       /s/ Zan Guerry
                                            --------------------------
                                            Zan Guerry
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  July  6, 2005                       /s/ Richard D. Moss
                                            --------------------------
                                            Richard D. Moss
                                            Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer


     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q, or as a separate disclosure document.

     A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS
BEEN PROVIDED TO CHATTEM, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CHATTEM, INC. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States      Code)**

| Dated:   April 10, 2006 | /s/ Zan              Guerry                                             |   |   |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                              | Zan Guerry                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |
|                              | Chairman and Chief Executive              Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |   |

| Dated:   April 10, 2006 | /s/ Robert E.                Bosworth                             |   |   |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                              | Robert E. Bosworth                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |   |
|                              | Principal Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

PHILIP CHARVAT, on behalf of himself )

and others similarly situated, ) Case No. 1:12-cv-05746

Plaintiff, )

v. )

) Hon. Judge Andrea R. Wood

ELIZABETH VALENTE et al., )

Defendants. )

AMENDMENT TO FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

AND 

FINAL JUDGMENT

In its Order dated February 27, 2020 (DE 744) the Court found with respect to the two 

proposed amendments to Class Action Settlement as follows:

A lower threshold dollar amount for distributions of remaining settlement 

funds benefits all class members, since it would provide more class 

members with a second round of payments. The proposed fees to 

objectors’ counsel would not impact class members at all, as Class 

Counsel’s payment would come out of their own fee award and 

Defendants’ payment from funds outside the settlement amount. Neither 

change to the settlement impacts the class members’ bargained-for rights. 

Thus, if the case is remanded, the Court will not require a new round of 

class notice or conduct another fairness hearing prior to issuing a ruling 

approving the amended settlement. 

The Court finds that the proposed amendments do not impact its 

prior reasoning approving the settlement as fair. Additionally, a speedier 

settlement and payout is in all class members’ interests.

The Court finds that its reasoning remains true following remand from the Seventh Circuit, 

and in light of the Settlement Agreement between Class Counsel, the Cruise Line Defendants, and 

Objectors (DE 739-2) (“Objector Agreement”), incorporated herein, the Court’s findings above 

and in DE 744, and upon remand from the Seventh Circuit on March 20, 2020, the Final Order of 

Dismissal and Final Judgment (DE 730) (“Final Judgment”) is amended to reflect that: (1) the 

Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 747-1 Filed: 03/23/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:24400
2

threshold administrative feasibility amount addressed in Section 8.4 of the Class Action Settlement 

Agreement and Release (“Agreement”) (DE 569-1, 574-1), and in Paragraph 13(e) of the Final 

Judgment, is decreased from $5.00 to $2.50; and (2) Class Counsel and the Cruise Line Defendants 

are authorized to pay Objectors in accordance with the Objector Agreement. 

Accordingly, with no just reason for delay, and pursuant to the Agreement and Objector 

Agreement, judgment is herewith entered. Civil case terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

_________________________________

HON. ANDREA R. WOOD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 747-1 Filed: 03/23/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:24401
# C_2017358EN.01000501.xml

| 24.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 October 2017

(2017/C 358/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1740 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4437 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89090 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6440 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1581 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3883 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,641 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2266 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6000 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,3386 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5018 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4835 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1607 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6838 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5996 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 326,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0711 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7957 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5070 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 888,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9718 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,458 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,4375 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,965 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7493 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,2922 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,3365 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1740

JPY

Japanese yen

133,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4437

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89090

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6440

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1581

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3883

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,641

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2266

RON

Romanian leu

4,6000

TRY

Turkish lira

4,3386

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5018

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4835

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1607

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6838

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5996

KRW

South Korean won

1 326,40

ZAR

South African rand

16,0711

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7957

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5070

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 888,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9718

PHP

Philippine peso

60,458

RUB

Russian rouble

67,4375

THB

Thai baht

38,965

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7493

MXN

Mexican peso

22,2922

INR

Indian rupee

76,3365

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
H. Con. Res. 43 Agreed to June 14, 2023

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-three 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby 

Association (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall 

be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in 

this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

(b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on June 17, 

2023, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of 

the Senate jointly designate. 

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed by the 

Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event 

shall be— 

(1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and 

(2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress. 

(b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall assume full 

responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities 

associated with the event. 

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 

sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 

sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event. 

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board 

are authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be 

required to carry out the event. 

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 

restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 

Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations 

on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable 

to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
PDF (9.8M)

PDF (10.4M)

U.S. Department of Education Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2022-2026

Department-wide annual plans and performance reports describe the goals and intended outcomes of U.S. Department of Education programs and initiatives.  Annual strategies and targets are published in performance plans in advance of each fiscal year; results are reported in annual performance and accountability reports following the fiscal year end.

## Agency Financial Reports

FY 2023 Agency Financial ReportPDF (9.8M)November 16, 2023

FY 2022 Agency Financial ReportPDF (16M)January 23, 2023

FY 2021 Agency Financial ReportPDF (10M)November 19, 2021

FY 2020 Agency Financial ReportPDF (9.14M)November 16, 2020

FY 2019 Agency Financial ReportPDF (9.0M)November 15, 2019

FY 2018 Agency Financial ReportPDF (12.0M)November 15, 2018

FY 2017 Agency Financial ReportPDF (20.0M)November 13, 2017

FY 2016 Agency Financial ReportPDF (18.0M)November 14, 2016

## Performance Plans and Reports

FY 2022 Annual Performance Report and FY 2024 Annual Performance PlanPDF (10.4M)Posting date March 30, 2023

FY 2023 Annual Performance Plan and FY 2021 Annual Performance ReportPDF (5M)Posting date August 3, 2022

FY 2022 Annual Performance PlanPDF (3M)Posting date May 28, 2021

FY 2020 Annual Performance ReportPDF (6.5M)Posting date January 15, 2021

FY 2019 Annual Performance Report and FY 2021 Annual Performance PlanPDF (10.2.0M)Posting date February 10, 2020

FY 2018 Annual Performance Report and FY 2020 Annual Performance PlanPDF (17.2M)Posting date March 18, 2019

FY 2017 Annual Performance Report and FY 2019 Annual Performance PlanPDF (16.5M)Posting date February 12, 2018

FY 2016 Annual Performance Report and FY 2018 Annual Performance PlanPDF (5.8M)Posting date May 23, 2017

FY 2015 Annual Performance Report and FY 2017 Annual Performance PlanPDF (4.6M)Posting date February 9, 2016

FY 2014 Annual Performance Report and FY 2016 Annual Performance PlanPDF (2.6M)Posting date February 2, 2015

FY 2013 Annual Performance Report and FY 2015 Annual Performance PlanPDF (2.0M)Posting date March 10, 2014

FY 2012 Annual Performance Report and FY 2014 Annual Performance PlanPosting date April 10, 2013

## Performance and Accountability Reports

FY 2023 Annual Report for Federal Student AidPDF (14M)November 16, 2023

FY 2022 Annual Report for Federal Student AidPDF (14.2M)January 24, 2022

FY 2021 Annual Report for Federal Student AidPDF (8.7M)November 19, 2021

FY 2020 Annual Report for Federal Student AidPDF (11.3M)November 16, 2020

FY 2019 Annual Report for Federal Student AidPDF (6.5M)December 5, 2019

FY 2018 Annual Report for Federal Student AidPDF (4M)November 15, 2018

FY 2017 Annual Report for Federal Student AidPDF (16.5M)November 13, 2017

## Grantee Satisfaction Surveys

## Other Reports

Reports on E-Gov, Employee Survey, Hiring Reform Plan, FAIR Act, Freedom of Information Act, Grantee Satisfaction, HSPD 12, Report to Congress, and More
#### 2901.105 Issuance.
#### 27.404 Basic rights in data clause.

This section describes the operation of the clause at 52.227-14, Rights in Data—General, and also the use of the provision at 52.227-15, Representation of Limited Rights Data and Restricted Computer Software.
Case: 1:12-cv-02391 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/30/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:35
32.806 Contract clauses. ( a ) ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-23, Assignment of Claims, in solicitations and contracts expected to exceed the micro-purchase threshold, unless the contract will prohibit the assignment of claims (see 32.803(b)). The use of the clause is not required for purchase orders. However, the clause may be used in purchase orders expected to exceed the micro-purchase threshold, that are accepted in writing by the contractor, if such use is consistent with agency policies and regulations.
( 2 ) If a no-setoff commitment has been authorized (see FAR 32.803(d)), the contracting officer shall use the clause with its *Alternate I.*
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.232-24, Prohibition of Assignment of Claims, in solicitations and contracts for which a determination has been made under agency regulations that the prohibition of assignment of claims is in the Government's interest.
[48 FR 42328, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 2665, Jan. 17, 1986; 60 FR 49730, Sept. 26, 1995; 61 FR 18921, Apr. 29, 1996]
#### Converters Transportation, Inc., Appellant, v Kaye Fabrics Corp., Respondent. Converters Transportation, Inc., Appellant.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 7, 1978, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Williams, J., at Special Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Lane, J. P., Markewich, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.
# C_2018043EN.01000101.xml

| 6.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 February 2018

(2018/C 43/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2440 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4433 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88568 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8338 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1599 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 125,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6108 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,196 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,60 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1585 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6333 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6774 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5664 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5468 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7288 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7025 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6387 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 352,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9635 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8248 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 787,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8557 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,169 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,4985 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,223 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0174 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1245 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,7435 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2440

JPY

Japanese yen

136,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4433

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88568

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8338

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1599

ISK

Iceland króna

125,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6108

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,196

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,60

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1585

RON

Romanian leu

4,6333

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6774

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5664

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5468

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7288

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7025

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6387

KRW

South Korean won

1 352,64

ZAR

South African rand

14,9635

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8248

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 787,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8557

PHP

Philippine peso

64,169

RUB

Russian rouble

70,4985

THB

Thai baht

39,223

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0174

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1245

INR

Indian rupee

79,7435

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
25.205 Postaward determinations. ( a ) If a contractor requests a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American statute after contract award, the contractor must explain why it could not request the determination before contract award or why the need for such determination otherwise was not reasonably foreseeable. If the contracting officer concludes that the contractor should have made the request before contract award, the contracting officer may deny the request.
( b ) The contracting officer must base evaluation of any request for a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American statute made after contract award on information required by paragraphs (c) and (d) of the applicable clause at 52.225-9 or 52.225-11 and/or other readily available information.
( c ) If a determination, under 25.202(a), is made after contract award that an exception to the Buy American statute applies, the contracting officer must negotiate adequate consideration and modify the contract to allow use of the foreign construction material. When the basis for the exception is the unreasonable price of a domestic construction material, adequate consideration is at least the differential established in 25.202(a) or in accordance with agency procedures.
[64 FR 72419, Dec. 27, 1999, as amended at 79 FR 24209, Apr. 29, 2014]
Eligible applicants include:

-  institutions of higher education (IHEs), 
- local education agencies (LEAs), 
- nonprofit organizations, 
- state education agencies (SEAs), and 
- other organizations and/or agencies.

In addition to the categories above, public charter schools that are LEAs under state law, other public agencies, private nonprofit organizations, for-profit organizations, outlying areas (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), freely associated states, and Indian tribes or tribal organizations.