alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             951
<SECURITIES>                                        49
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,125
<PP&E>                                           8,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,319
<SALES>                                         21,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,354
<CGS>                                           11,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (623)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (623)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
Master's Degree Programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities

FY 2009 Grantees

State HBCU Master's Grantee FY 2009 Awards

AR University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff $500,000.00 

GA Savannah State University $500,000.00 

GA Albany State University $500,000.00 

GA Fort Valley State University $500,000.00 

KY Kentucky State University $500,000.00 

LA Grambling State University $500,000.00 

MD Coppin State University $500,000.00 

MS Alcorn State University $500,000.00 

MS Mississippi Valley State University $500,000.00 

NC Elizabeth City State University $500,000.00 

NC Fayetteville State University $500,000.00 

NC Winston-Salem State University $500,000.00 

OH Wilberforce University $500,000.00 

SC South Carolina State University $500,000.00 

SC Claflin University $500,000.00 

TN Fisk University $500,000.00 

VA Virginia State University $500,000.00 

WV West Virginia State University $500,000.00 

Total Award Amount: $9,000,000.00 

as of 5/25/2011
3009.570-4 Solicitation provision and contract clause. ( a ) Use the provision at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.209-74, Limitations on Contractors Acting as Lead System Integrators, in solicitations for the acquisition of a major system when the acquisition strategy envisions the use of a lead system integrator.
( b ) Use the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.209-75, Prohibited Financial Interests for Lead System Integrators— ( 1 ) In solicitations that include the provision at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.209-74; and
( 2 ) In contracts when the contractor will fill the role of a lead system integrator for the acquisition of a major system.
[75 FR 41099, July 15, 2010]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 64 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 64

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
 Treasury relating to ``Returns by Exempt Organizations and Returns by 
                  Certain Non-Exempt Organizations''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury relating to ``Returns 
by Exempt Organizations and Returns by Certain Non-Exempt 
Organizations'' (Rev. Proc. 2018-38 (July 16, 2018)), received in the 
House of Representatives on July 26, 2018, and received in the Senate 
on July 30, 2018, and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate December 12, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 64

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
 Treasury relating to ``Returns by Exempt Organizations and Returns by 
                  Certain Non-Exempt Organizations''.
```
Order entered February 2 7 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01586
- CR SYLVIA ROMERO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F01
- 16575
- X



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in this appeal within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.
We ORDER court reporter Debi Harris to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of
this o rder, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 9, a CD.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Debi Harris, Deputy Official Court Reporter; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the
Dallas Cou nty District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
## Legislation

- Higher Education Act  Most Office of Postsecondary Education programs and activities are authorized under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.  The Higher Education Opportunity Act (Public Law 110-315) (HEOA) was enacted on August 14, 2008, and reauthorizes the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA).   An unofficial compilation of the Higher Education Act was published by the U.S. House of Representatives Office of Legislative Counsel.  This compilation is current through July 1, 2009.    -  Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended    The Higher Education Act is in Title 20, Chapter 28 of the United States Code available from the Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute.  Prior to the enactment of the HEOA, The Higher Education Act was last reauthorized in 1998.    - 1998 Amendments to the HEA . 
- Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961  The Fulbright-Hays Training Grants programs are authorized by the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, codified in Title 22, Chapter 33 of the U.S. Code.  (Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute)

## Regulations

- OPE Program Regulations    Regulations specific to programs administered by OPE are available from the U.S. Government Printing Office in:     - HTML format
  - Text and Portable Document Format 
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR)

## Federal Student Aid Policy Resources

- Information for Financial  Aid Professionals : Technical publications, regulations, and policy guidance  on the administration of the Federal Student Financial Assistance Programs.

## Other OPE Policy Resources

- Archive of Postsecondary Education Policy and Program Initiatives 

U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Postsecondary Education Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) Building 400 Maryland Avenue,  S.W.Washington, DC 20202
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 31 Filed: 12/07/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1473
## FY 2023

- Summary of Funding    MS Word  (18K) 
- List of New Awards    MS Excel  (20K) 
- Abstracts of Funded Projects    PDF  (1.6M) 

## FY 2022

- List of New Awards    MS Excel  (11K) 
- Abstracts of Funded Projects    PDF  (198K) 

## FY 2021

- List of New Awards    MS Excel  (20K) 
- Abstracts of Funded Projects    MS Word  (25K) |  PDF  (148K) 

## FY 2020

- List of New Awards    MS Excel  (20K) 
- Abstracts of Funded Projects    MS Word  (24K) |  PDF  (190K) 

## FY 2019

- List of New Awards    MS Excel  (21K) 
- Abstracts of Funded Projects    MS Word  (52K) |  PDF  (268K) 

## FY 2014

- List of New Awards    MS Excel  (21K) 
- Abstracts of Funded Projects    MS Word  (178K)

## FY 2010

- List of New Awards    MS Excel  (21K) 
- Abstracts of Funded Projects    MS Word  (167K) |  PDF  (150K)

## FY 2009

- List of New Awards    PDF  (33K)
- Abstracts of Funded Projects    PDF  (145K)

Note: FY 2009 was the first year of funding for this program.

Institutional Service Home
## Timeline

Application Available: October 25, 2022Application Deadline: November 25, 2022

## Federal Register Notice

- Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for FY 2022  dated October 25, 2022 |   PDF

Current Application

All applicants are required to submit an application online through Grants.gov.

Through Grants.gov you will be able to download a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit your application. You must search for the downloadable application package for ED-GRANTS-073018-002. If you experience problems submitting your application through Grants.gov, refer to the Support page and/or contact the Grants.gov Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. For program-specific questions, contact the program officer below.

If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to one of the program contact persons listed below.

Tips and Assistance

### Webinar Information

Digital Learning Infrastructure and IT Modernization Pilot Technical Assistance WorkshopThursday, November 3, 20223:00PM - 4:00PM

Click here to view the Webinar presentation

Applicant Contacts

Pearson Owens, (202) 453-7997, pearson.owens@ed.govU.S. Department of Education, OPE400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Room 250-72Washington, DC 20202

FIPSE Home
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0044

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSEPH RICHARD POLAK II,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ P ursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Rod Souza , Distri ct Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 20 2021

10/20/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0044
Appendix Q 

Explanation of OPP Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes for ECOTOX Data 

Studies located and coded into ECOTOX must meet acceptability criteria, as established 

in the Interim Guidance of the Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Toxicity Data in the 

Open Literature, Phase I and II, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, July 16, 2004. Studies that do not meet these criteria are designated 

in the bibliography as “Accepted for ECOTOX but not OPP.” The intent of the 

acceptability criteria is to ensure data quality and verifiability. The criteria parallel 

criteria used in evaluating registrant-submitted studies. Specific criteria are listed below, 

along with the corresponding rejection code. 

· The paper does not report toxicology information for a chemical of 

concern to OPP; (Rejection Code: NO COC) 

· The article is not published in English language; (Rejection Code: NO 

FOREIGN) 

· The study is not presented as a full article. Abstracts will not be 

considered; (Rejection Code: NO ABSTRACT) 

· The paper is not publicly available document; (Rejection Code: NO NOT 

PUBLIC (typically not used, as any paper acquired from the ECOTOX 

holding or through the literature search is considered public) 

· The paper is not the primary source of the data; (Rejection Code: NO 

REVIEW) 

· The paper does not report that treatment(s) were compared to an 

acceptable control; (Rejection Code: NO CONTROL) 

· The paper does not report an explicit duration of exposure; (Rejection 

Code: NO DURATION) 

· The paper does not report a concurrent environmental chemical 

concentration/dose or application rate; (Rejection Code: NO CONC) 

· The paper does not report the location of the study (e.g., laboratory vs. 

field); (Rejection Code: NO LOCATION) 

· The paper does not report a biological effect on live, whole organisms; 

(Rejection Code: NO IN-VITRO) 

· The paper does not report the species that was tested; and this species can 

be verified in a reliable source; (Rejection Code: NO SPECIES) 

· The paper does not report effects associated with exposure to a single 

chemical. (Rejection Code: NO MIXTURE). It should be noted that all 

papers including data on pesticide mixtures are considered. 

Additionally, efficacy studies on target species are excluded and coded as NO 

TARGET. 
Data that originated from the OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database is coded as NO 

EFED. These data are already available to the chemical team.
- Home
      - About
      - **People**
      - Programs
      - Funding
      - Policy
      - Products 
      - Resources
      - Contact

      - **OAS**
      - Office of the Assistant Secretary
      - **OSEP**
      - Office of Special Education Programs
      - **RSA**
      - Rehabilitation Services Administration

### OSERS Navigation

About OSERS | People and Offices | Programs and ProjectsGrants and Funding | Legislation and Policy | Publications, Products, Research and StatisticsAdditional Resources | Contact and Feedback
3009.108-7004 Waivers. ( a ) The Secretary shall waive the provisions of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.108-7001 with respect to any specific contract if the Secretary determines that the waiver is required in the interest of national security.
( b ) Contractors shall submit waiver requests to the CPO. A copy of the waiver request or the approved waiver shall be attached with the bid or proposal.
[71 FR 25769, May 2, 2006. Redesignated at 74 FR 58856, Nov. 16, 2009, 74 FR 66584, Dec. 16, 2009; 76 FR 70661, Nov. 15, 2011]
#### Combine Camera Stores, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Interphoto Corporation et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 28, 1978, dismissing the complaint on the ground of *res judicata,*is unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs and disbursements to respondents. In addition to the reasons stated by Justice Hughes, we note that the alleged misconduct of defendants—whether it be labeled breach of contract, fraud, duress or oppression—related to whether or not defendant would agree to a plan of arrangement in the chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding and thus should be deemed disposed of by the order approving the plan of arrangement. As stated in *Miller v Meinhard-Commercial Corp.*(462 F2d 358, 360) "The suit obviously turns upon what could *802or should have happened in the bankruptcy proceeding.” Further, plaintiff corporation as debtor in possession urged this claim in the bankruptcy court as a ground for damages and for disallowing defendant’s claim to vote on the plan of arrangement; plaintiff withdrew that claim in open court in connection with the submission of the amended plan of arrangement; and thereafter agreed on the amount of defendant’s claim to be allowed in the chapter 11 proceedings, and an order was entered allowing the claim. Concur—Fein, JJ., Sandler, Sullivan, Lane and Silverman, JJ.
**DM** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 646 STATE OF MONTANA ,

P la intiff and Appell ee , v. V. NAVA CRUZITA CONNOR ,

Defenda nt and Appell an

t . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 6 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Novem

ber 2 4 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 18 2020

09/18/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0646
#### Albert Freedman, Appellant, v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company, Defendant, and Mona Freedman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Percy Freedman, Deceased, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 350 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 350

Recognizing the 69th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human 
          Rights and the celebration of ``Human Rights Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2017

  Mr. Coons (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Inhofe, Ms. 
Baldwin, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Brown, Mr. Young, Mr. Franken, Mr. McCain, Mr. 
 Van Hollen, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Casey, Mr. 
Wyden, and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the 69th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human 
          Rights and the celebration of ``Human Rights Day''.

Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations 
        69 years ago on December 10, 1948, represents the first comprehensive 
        agreement among nations as to the specific rights and freedoms of all 
        human beings;
Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights upholds the basic principles 
        of liberty and freedom enshrined in the Constitution of the United 
        States and the Bill of Rights;
Whereas awareness of human rights--

    (1) is essential to the realization of fundamental freedoms;

    (2) promotes equality;

    (3) contributes to preventing conflict and human rights violations; and

    (4) enhances participation in democratic processes;

Whereas Congress has a proud history of promoting human rights that are 
        internationally recognized; and
Whereas December 10 of each year is celebrated around the world as ``Human 
        Rights Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the 69th anniversary of the Universal 
        Declaration of Human Rights and the celebration of ``Human 
        Rights Day'';
            (2) supports the ideals of human rights and reaffirms the 
        Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
            (3) encourages all nations to continue working towards 
        freedom, peace, and security, which can be achieved through 
        democracy, respect for human rights, and the rule of law; and
            (4) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        ``Human Rights Day'' and continue a commitment to upholding 
        freedom, democracy, and human rights across the globe.
                                 <all>
```
#### 2823.303 Contract clause.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Annual Report of MB Software  Corporation  on Form
10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Scott A. Haire,  Chief  Executive
Officer and principal financial officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1. The Report  complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/    Scott A. Haire
Scott A. Haire,
Chairman of the Board,
(Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Bryan Suhre

Appellate case number: 01-22-00011-CV

Trial court case number: 92053-I

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County

On February 1, 2022, this Court issued an order denying Relator Bryan Suhre’s petition 

for writ of mandamus. On February 22, 2022, Relator filed a motion to extend time to file his 

motion for rehearing. Relator’s motion for extension of time is granted. Relator’s motion for 

rehearing is due March 18, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.9.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy______________

Acting individually 

Date: March 3, 2022