alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 41 

Expressing support for the work of open water lifeguards as first responders 

and emergency response providers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2023 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the work of open water lifeguards 

as first responders and emergency response providers. 

Whereas open water lifeguards perform an essential function 

of protecting countless lives from death or serious injury; 

Whereas these lifeguards do so at great risk to their own 

lives; 

Whereas, in 2021, two lifeguards in the State of New Jersey 

lost their lives while performing their duty; 

Whereas many open water lifeguards are cross-trained in 

emergency medical response, marine fire safety, law enforcement, and water rescue craft operations; 

Whereas lifeguards respond and attend to victims, treat victims, assist victims, and transport victims, the 4 defined 

duties of a emergency response employee; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HCON 41 IH 

Whereas lifeguards not only protect life, but also property, 

evidence, and the environment, the 4 tenets which define 

a first responder; 

Whereas United States law already recognizes open water 

lifeguards as first responders or emergency response providers; 

Whereas many other countries recognize lifeguards as emergency responders, and grant them access to the programs 

to which first responders are entitled; and 

Whereas, during the COVID–19 emergency, open water lifeguards ought to have been considered ‘‘essential workers’’ 

and given priority access to vaccinations: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress reaffirms that open water life3 guards qualify as first responders and emergency response 

4 providers, and recognizes the essential, lifesaving work 

5 performed by these brave individuals. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:750 Case 2:12-cv-01057-GMN -RJJ Document 83-62 Filed 08/07/12 Page 2 of 2
# C_2018183EN.01000401.xml

| 29.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 May 2018

(2018/C 183/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1644 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4474 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87465 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2373 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1577 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,20 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5113 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,731 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 319,42 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3053 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6360 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,3482 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5410 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5114 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1354 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6756 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5615 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 250,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4979 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4508 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3950 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 324,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6316 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,112 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,6316 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,272 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2953 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,7650 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,5280 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1644

JPY

Japanese yen

127,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4474

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87465

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2373

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1577

ISK

Iceland króna

123,20

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5113

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,731

HUF

Hungarian forint

319,42

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3053

RON

Romanian leu

4,6360

TRY

Turkish lira

5,3482

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5410

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5114

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1354

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6756

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5615

KRW

South Korean won

1 250,83

ZAR

South African rand

14,4979

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4508

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3950

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 324,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6316

PHP

Philippine peso

61,112

RUB

Russian rouble

72,6316

THB

Thai baht

37,272

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2953

MXN

Mexican peso

22,7650

INR

Indian rupee

78,5280

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Branch, Appellant, v. Thomas Martin, as Superintendent of the Onondaga County Penitentiary, Respondent. The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Branch, Appellant, v. Sarto Major, as Sheriff of the County of Onondaga, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party, on the authority of the *People*v. *Bellfield*(33 Misc 2d 712, affd. 11 N Y 2d 947). (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Court dismissing a writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.
## Key Staff

**Division Director:**

James LawsE-mail: james.laws@ed.govTelephone: (202) 453-7348

**Lead Program Officer:**

Robyn M. WoodE-mail: robyn.wood@ed.govTelephone: (202) 453-7744

**Mailing Address:**U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Postsecondary  Education  Higher Education ProgramsAlaska Native and Native  Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Program    400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Room 2B203  Washington, DC  20202

Institutional Service Home
#### 2815.204 Contract format.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 15.204(e).
```

[111th Congress Public Law 181]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 1266]]

Public Law 111-181
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   101 West Highway 64 Bypass in Roper, North Carolina, as the ``E.V. 
      Wilkins Post Office''. <<NOTE: June 9, 2010 -  [H.R. 3892]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. E.V. WILKINS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 101 West Highway 64 Bypass in Roper, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``E.V. Wilkins Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``E.V. 
Wilkins Post Office''.

    Approved June 9, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3892:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Jan. 13, considered and passed House.
            May 25, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Richard Banks, Appellant-Respondent, v Laurene Banks, Respondent-Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 1, 1978, granting a dual divorce and providing for custody, visitation and various incidents of support, expenses, and counsel fees, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the case is remanded for a hearing and findings with respect to plaintiffs income and expenses and the feasibility of the plan for custody, child support and possession of the marital home and with respect to allowed and disallowed disbursements. The terms of the present arrangement embodied in the judgment are to continue subject to further order. The appeal and cross appeal from the order, entered May 31, 1978, is dismissed as moot; and the appeal from the order, entered September 28, 1978, is dismissed on the ground that an order denying reargument is nonappealable. No costs or disbursements are awarded to either party. This was a bitterly contested matrimonial action in which the trial court saw fit to grant dual divorces. The trial court went to great pains to plan positively for the benefit of the children; however, the court’s plan for the liquidation of the marriage does not determine all related issues and is subject to frustration by defendant’s refusal to comply with the conditions it imposes on her "sole custody” and "exclusive occupancy”, or, on the other hand, by the plaintiff’s lack of funds. Therefore, on this record this court cannot judge the propriety of the arrangement. The plaintiff claims the financial arrangement to be unfeasible, and, indeed, there has been no finding that plaintiff’s resources were understated or his expenses overstated. This is a proper subject for further and fuller exploration because, although this court may approve such a "child centered” plan, it can only work if plaintiff has sufficient funds. There should be evidence as to plaintiff’s ability to support this plan presented to the trial court, and findings should be made as to the plan’s desirability and economic feasibility. The court on remand can also take that opportunity to explore the legal disbursements that should be allowed to defendant. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Evans, Fein, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
Honorable George 

County Attorney 

Bastrop County Courthouse Re: Whether a constable may 

Bastrop, Texas lawfully be a surety on 

a bail bond of a defendant in the county where 

Dear Mr. Kelly: the constable holds office? 

Article 17.10, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure, 

provides the only disqualification of sureties on ball bonds, 

and reads as follows: 

“A minor cannot be surety on a 

ball bond, but the accused party may 

sign as principal.” 

A constable, therefore, is not disqualified by statute from 

becoming a surety on a bail bond. 

Article 5, Section 24, of the Constitution of the 

State of Texas provides: 

“County Judges, county attorneys, 

clerks of the District and County Courts, 

justices of the peace, constables., and 

other county officers, may be removed by 

the Judges of the Distr%zt Courts for incompetency, official misconduct, h’a’6Ttual 

drunkenness, or other causes defined by 

law, upon the cause therefor being set 

forth in writing and the finding of its 

truth by a jury.” (Emphasis supplied) 

In our opinion, the execution of a bail bond by a 

constable, as a surety, is not prohibited by the Statute 

quoted or by the Constitution. There may be facts, however, 

existing that would make such action official misconduct and 

subject the constable to possible removal from office. The 

specific facts involved In each instance must be carefully 

examined and each case stands on its own merits. 

- 24 - 
Konorable George Kelly, Page 2 (~-8 ) 

SUMMARY 

A constable is not barred by Article 

17.10, Vernon's Code of Criminal Z-acedure and Article 5, Section 24 of the 

Constitution of this State Prom becoming 

a surety on a bail bond. However, there 

might be other facts which would make 

such action official misconduct on his 

part and grounds for his possible removal 

from office. 

$$y txly yours , 

. 

arney General of Texas 

REO/dt 

Prepared by Robert E. Owen 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE: 

Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman 

W. V. Geppert, Co-chairman 

Robert Darden 

R. L. Lattimore 

Sam Relley 

W. 0. Shultz 

Staff Legal Assistant 

A. J. Carubbl, Jr. 

- 25 -
**Program Office:**Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education**CFDA Number:** 84.116M**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants

Program Description

The **Postsecondary Student Success Grant (PSSG) Program** is a grant program designed to equitably improve postsecondary student outcomes, including retention, transfer (including successful transfer of completed credits), credit accumulation, and completion, by leveraging data and implementing, scaling, and rigorously evaluating evidence-based activities to support data-driven decisions and actions by institutional leaders committed to inclusive student success.

FIPSE Home
# C_2018347EN.01000201.xml

| 28.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 September 2018

(2018/C 347/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1707 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4591 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88973 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3208 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1371 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 128,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5015 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,715 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 323,70 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2779 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6701 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,0415 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6200 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5301 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1478 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7638 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5976 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 301,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,5152 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0550 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4318 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 450,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8398 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,357 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,9011 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,960 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,7290 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,0889 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,9830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1707

JPY

Japanese yen

132,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4591

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88973

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3208

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1371

ISK

Iceland króna

128,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5015

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,715

HUF

Hungarian forint

323,70

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2779

RON

Romanian leu

4,6701

TRY

Turkish lira

7,0415

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6200

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5301

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1478

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7638

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5976

KRW

South Korean won

1 301,82

ZAR

South African rand

16,5152

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0550

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4318

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 450,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8398

PHP

Philippine peso

63,357

RUB

Russian rouble

76,9011

THB

Thai baht

37,960

BRL

Brazilian real

4,7290

MXN

Mexican peso

22,0889

INR

Indian rupee

84,9830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
# CCAMPIS-FY 2015
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1025
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:1026
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:1027
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:1028
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:1029
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:1030
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:1031
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:1032
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:1033
Case: 1:12-cv-03609 Document #: 78 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:1034
2810.002 Procedures. ( a ) Market research must be conducted in accordance with DOJ sustainability policies and procedures in order to determine whether there are any sustainable acquisition standards applicable to the desired product or service.
( b ) Ensure the statement of work includes sustainability requirements in accordance with JAR 2823.103, when applicable.
Page2Page 3Page4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9Page 10Page 11Page 12Page 13Page 14Page 15Page 16Page 17Page 18Page 19Page20Page21
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Alan Vituli                                  
|-------------------------------------------------
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|November 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                                                      
| |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Roger H. Ballou
| |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Roger H. Ballou President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 9, 2008



| |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                                       
| |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark A. Kerschner
| |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Mark A. Kerschner Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 9, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
3001.104 Applicability. ( a ) The following order of precedence applies to resolve any acquisition regulation or procedural inconsistency found within HSAR or the Homeland Security Acquisition Manual (HSAM): ( 1 ) Statute;
( 2 ) FAR or other applicable regulation or Executive Order;
( 3 ) HSAR;
( 4 ) Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Directives; and
( 5 ) HSAM.
( b ) The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) exception to this regulation is authorized by the Aviation and Transportation Security Act of 2001 (ATSA) (section 101(a) of Public Law 107-71, as implemented at section 114(o) of title 49) for contracts awarded by TSA pursuant to this ATSA authority. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008, Public Law 110-161, Division E, Title V, section 568 eliminates ATSA section 114(o) effective June 23, 2008. Accordingly, TSA acquisitions initiated after June 22, 2008 are subject to 48 CFR Chapters 1 and 30.
( c ) Contracts involving Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentalities (NAFIs) must contain suitable dispute provisions and may provide for appellate dispute jurisdiction in the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA). However, the contract must not attempt to confer court jurisdiction that does not otherwise exist.
( d ) The FAR and HSAR may be followed, where feasible, for: ( 1 ) No-cost contracts;
( 2 ) Concession contracts; and
( 3 ) Contracts on behalf of NAFIs entered into by appropriated fund contracting officers.
[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 25767, May 2, 2006; 72 FR 1297, Jan. 11, 2007; 73 FR 30318, May 27, 2008]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Section 102(b)(6) of the Fulbright-Hays Act    MS Word  (88K) |  PDF  (87K);    22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6)

## Regulations

                - 34 CFR 663
                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR), Parts 74, 75, 77, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

IFLE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov