alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017015EN.01000401.xml

| 17.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 January 2017

(2017/C 15/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0594 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87808 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4830 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0709 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0558 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,38 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3729 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5023 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0056 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4172 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3927 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2159 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4916 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5144 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 253,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4212 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3107 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5318 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 160,47 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7313 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,926 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,1692 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,524 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4130 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,8780 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,1670 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0594

JPY

Japanese yen

120,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87808

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4830

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0709

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0558

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,38

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3729

RON

Romanian leu

4,5023

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0056

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4172

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3927

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2159

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4916

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5144

KRW

South Korean won

1 253,65

ZAR

South African rand

14,4212

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3107

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5318

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 160,47

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7313

PHP

Philippine peso

52,926

RUB

Russian rouble

63,1692

THB

Thai baht

37,524

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4130

MXN

Mexican peso

22,8780

INR

Indian rupee

72,1670

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### HINES, Respondent, v. SECURITY TRUST CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by Martin Hines against the Security Trust Company.

No opinion. Motion for re-argument denied, with $10 costs and disbursements. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sylvester E. Adams, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered May 9, 1950 after a jury trial, convicting him of murder in the second degree, .and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed on the law and new trial granted. No questions of fact were considered. We agree with the recommendation of the District Attorney that reversal and new trial are necessary in this ease. Timely notice of appeal was served in 1950 and after some delay the appeal was dismissed. Many intervening applications ensued; they culminated in our order of October 28, 1963, whereby we vacated our prior order dated May 21, 1951 dismissing the appeal, reinstated the appeal, gave defendant poor person relief and assigned counsel. The official court reporter at the trial has now deposed that his stenographic notes of the attorneys’ summations have been destroyed and were never transcribed. Lacking this portion of the *“*entire proceedings ” (Code Crim. Pro., § 456), the defendant, in view of the facts in this case, would be deprived of his right to a fair and complete appellate review (see *People*v. *Mininni,*21 A D 2d 811; *People*v. *Moorer,*20 A D 2d 730). The summations, in their cumulative effect, could bear very heavily on the question of whether defendant had received a fair trial, especially since the trial itself was replete with judicial admonitions to both the prosecutor and the defense counsel to comport themselves properly. This factor alone is sufficient cause to distinguish *People*v. *Fearon*(13 N Y 2d 59). Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment with the following memorandum: The absence of merely the summations of counsel should not automatically require reversal. Prejudicial summations are sometimes regarded as' constituting reversible error *(People*v. *Tassiello,*300 N. Y. 425) and sometimes not. Thus, where the guilt of the defendant is overwhelming, the erroneous summation is regarded as not prejudicial *(People*v. *Fearon,*13 N Y 2d 59; *People*v. *Halio,*13 N Y 2d 1073). In this case the defendant’s guilt is so clear that it is wrong to conclude, not only that there was error in the summation, but that such error was so serious that it overcomes defendant’s clear guilt. Nor do I consider the detective’s hearsay testimony to the effect that defendant’s mother had first stated she did not know defendant and then stated that he was illegitimate, to be so serious as to warrant reversal. (For prior related appeals, see 12 N Y 2d 417.)
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 20306 Summary Calendar

BLANCA EMID PETTY

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

JOHN KENT PETTY; ROSEMARIE REEVES; CHAD ELLIS; MARK HUMPHREY; JOHN MILAM MERCK, SR.; SCOT A. POWELL; MARIE APPLING POWELL; RICHARD KERZEE; VINCENT L. MARABLE, III; JIMMY PHILLIP S, JR.; PAIGE CURRAN CUNNINGHAM

,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CV

- 2449

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Blanca Emid Petty has appealed the district court’s order dismissing her
diversity complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4. Petty has not shown that the district court abused its

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 7, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-20306 Document: 00514063099 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/07/2017No. 16

- 20306

2 discretion. See F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 4(m); Lindsey v. United States R. R. Retirement

Bd. , 101 F.3d 444, 445 (5th Cir. 1996)

. The district court’s order is A FFIRMED. Case: 16-20306 Document: 00514063099 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/07/2017
#### 232.501 General.
#### 3019.705-1 General support for the program.

In any solicitation where subcontracting plans will be required for one or more offerors, contracting officers may include evaluation factors that consider the quality of proposed subcontracting plans and past performance under previous subcontracting plans. Contracting officers must ensure that these factors do not penalize companies not required to submit subcontracting plans.

[71 FR 25770, May 2, 2006]
#### Merritt Corporation v. Milton A. Bass.

Motion for a stay denied. That branch of the motion requesting permission to file supplemental appellant’s points is granted on condition that said supplemental appellant’s points are served and filed on or before August 30, 1962. If the appellant fails to comply with the condition imposed, the respondents may enter an order dismissing the appeal without notice to the appellant. Concur —Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
#### 3052.217-100 Guarantee (USCG).

As prescribed in USCG guidance at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3017.9000(c), insert the following clause:

# Guarantee (USCG) (JUN 2006)

(a) In the event any work performed or materials furnished by the contractor prove defective or deficient within 60 days from the date of redelivery of the vessel(s), the Contractor, as directed by the Contracting Officer and at its own expense, shall correct and repair the deficiency to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer.

(b) If the Contractor or any subcontractor has a guarantee for work performed or materials furnished that exceeds the 60 day period, the Government shall be entitled to rely upon the longer guarantee until its expiration.

(c) With respect to any individual work item identified as incomplete at the time of redelivery of the vessel(s), the guarantee period shall run from the date the item is completed.

(d) If practicable, the Government shall give the Contractor an opportunity to correct the deficiency.

(1) If the Contracting Officer determines it is not practicable or is otherwise not advisable to return the vessel(s) to the Contractor, or the Contractor fails to proceed with the repairs promptly, the Contracting Officer may direct that the repairs be performed elsewhere, at the Contractor's expense.

(2) If correction and repairs are performed by other than the Contractor, the Contracting Officer may discharge the Contractor's liability by making an equitable deduction in the price of the contract.

(e) The Contractor's liability shall extend for an additional 60-day guarantee period on those defects or deficiencies that the Contractor corrected.

(f) At the option of the Contracting officer, defects and deficiencies may be left uncorrected. In that event, the Contractor and Contracting Officer shall negotiate an equitable reduction in the contract price. Failure to agree upon an equitable reduction shall constitute a dispute under the Disputes clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

[68 FR 67871, Dec. 4, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 25775, May 2, 2006]
### APPENDIX C

- 2

2011 Non road Source Ozone Season Inventory

Provided in Electronic Form Only

Bureau of Air Quality

Department of Environmental Protection[ This page intentionally left blank

. ]
U.S. Department of Education

Negotiated Rulemaking

Program Integrity and Institutional Quality and TRIO

March 4 - 7, 2024

Links shared in the Zoom Chat during session 3

March 4, 2024, Day 1

Description Link Provided by 

Dear Colleague Letter 

Direct Assessment

https://fsapartners.ed.gov/knowledgecenter/library/dear-colleague-letters/2024-02-

14/applying-title-iv-eligibility-direct-assessmentcompetency-based-programs

Jo Blondin

March 5, 2024, Day 2

Description Link Provided by 

List of the colleges in 

the Sweet v. Cardona 

settlement agreement

https://www.highereddive.com/news/heres-a-list-of-thecolleges-in-the-sweet-v-cardona-settlementagreement/629283/

Robyn Smith

March 6, 2024, Day 3

None

March 7, Day 4

Description Link Provided by 

State Attorneys General 

Policy Change 

Recommendations to 

Improve NC-SARA 

Student Protections

080321_NC_SARA.pdf (marylandattorneygeneral.gov) Emmett Blaney

Evidence Expectations 

by Standard Guidelines

https://www.msche.org/2023/06/30/evidenceexpectations-by-standardguidelines/#:~:text=The%20Evidence%20Expectations%20

by%20Standard%20Guidelines%20is%20a,be%20provided

%20to%20document%20compliance%20under%20each%2

0standard.

Scott Dolan

When Will the 

Watchdogs Bite?

https://www.thirdway.org/blog/when-will-the-watchdogsbiteRobyn Smith
Biden's Education 

Department looks to 

ditch accreditor of 

seemingly fake school

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2021/

01/23/education-dept-suggests-termination-acics-reagannational-university/6671390002/

Barmak Nissarin

and Jessi Morales

 

All links included in this document are active as of 3/7/2024

** By selecting the following link, you will be leaving the Department of Education’s (ED’s) 

website and navigating to a third-party site. This site and its contents are managed by 

organizations that may or may not have a business relationship with ED. As such, the 

Department is not responsible for the product, service, or overall website contents nor can it 

guarantee that any of the above are accessible in accordance with Section 508 of the 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973. If you need accessibility support, please reach out to the third-party 

vendor for assistance.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 9 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas socialist ideology necessitates a concentration of 

power that has time and time again collapsed into Communist regimes, totalitarian rule, and brutal dictatorships; 

Whereas socialism has repeatedly led to famine and mass 

murders, and the killing of over 100,000,000 people 

worldwide; 
2 

•HCON 9 EH 

Whereas many of the greatest crimes in history were committed by socialist ideologues, including Vladimir Lenin, 

Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Fidel Castro, Pol Pot, Kim 

Jong Il, Kim Jong Un, Daniel Ortega, Hugo Chavez, and 

Nicola ́s Maduro; 

Whereas tens of millions died in the Bolshevik Revolution, at 

least 10,000,000 people were sent to the gulags in the 

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), and millions 

more starved in the Terror-Famine (Holodomor) in 

Ukraine; 

Whereas between 15,000,000 and 55,000,000 people starved 

to death in the wake of famine and devastation caused 

by the Great Leap Forward in China; 

Whereas the socialist experiment in Cambodia led to the killing fields in which over a million people were gruesomely 

murdered; 

Whereas up to 3,500,000 people have starved in North 

Korea, dividing a land of freedom from a land of destitution; 

Whereas the Castro regime in Cuba expropriated the land of 

Cuban farmers and the businesses of Cuban entrepreneurs, stealing their possessions and their livelihoods, 

and exiling millions with nothing but the clothes on their 

backs; 

Whereas the implementation of socialism in Venezuela has 

turned a once-prosperous nation into a failed State with 

the world’s highest rate of inflation; 

Whereas the author of the Declaration of Independence, 

President Thomas Jefferson, wrote, ‘‘To take from one, 

because it is thought that his own industry and that of 

his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to 
3 

•HCON 9 EH 

others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle 

of association, the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, and the fruits acquired by it.’’; 

Whereas the ‘‘Father of the Constitution’’, President James 

Madison, wrote that it ‘‘is not a just government, nor is 

property secure under it, where the property which a man 

has in his personal safety and personal liberty, is violated 

by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest’’; and 

Whereas the United States of America was founded on the 

belief in the sanctity of the individual, to which the 

collectivistic system of socialism in all of its forms is fundamentally and necessarily opposed: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress denounces socialism in all its 

3 forms, and opposes the implementation of socialist policies 

4 in the United States of America. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 2, 

2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 9 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Denouncing the horrors of socialism.
## FY 2023

- New Award     MS Excel  (10K) 
- Project Abstract     PDF   (595K) 

## FY 2022

- New and Supplemental Awards    MS Excel  (11K) 
- Project Abstracts for New Awards    PDF   (222K)  
- Project Abstracts for Supplemental Awards (please see FY 2021 abstracts below)

## FY 2021

- New Award    MS Excel  (10.1K)
- Project Abstract    PDF  (163K)

## FY 2020

- New Award    MS Excel  (10.7K)
- Project Abstract    PDF  (131K)

## FY 2019

- New Award    MS Excel  (9.75K)
- Project Abstract    PDF  (20K)

## FY 2018

- New Award    MS Excel  (9.6K)
- Project Abstract    PDF  (36K)

FIPSE Home
Chart 12206HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       12206          Edition:       33          Edition       Date: October       2008          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/17/2010     LNM -       7/13/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime CALDERON-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40621

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jaime Calderon-Moreno raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# C_2018344EN.01000201.xml

| 26.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 September 2018

(2018/C 344/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1777 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4597 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89425 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3515 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1376 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 130,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5713 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,613 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,08 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2930 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6618 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,2323 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6234 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5262 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1974 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7696 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6083 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 316,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9294 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0958 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4285 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 571,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8672 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,999 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,3603 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,193 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,8532 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,3696 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 85,6125 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1777

JPY

Japanese yen

132,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4597

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89425

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3515

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1376

ISK

Iceland króna

130,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5713

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,613

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,08

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2930

RON

Romanian leu

4,6618

TRY

Turkish lira

7,2323

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6234

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5262

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1974

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7696

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6083

KRW

South Korean won

1 316,95

ZAR

South African rand

16,9294

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0958

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4285

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 571,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8672

PHP

Philippine peso

63,999

RUB

Russian rouble

77,3603

THB

Thai baht

38,193

BRL

Brazilian real

4,8532

MXN

Mexican peso

22,3696

INR

Indian rupee

85,6125

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8210-8211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Eye Council, February 12, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 
National Eye Institute,

[[Page 8211]]

National Institutes of Health, 6700 Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting) which was published in the Federal 
Register on January 15, 2021, 86 FR 4104.
    The notice is being amended to change the end of the open session 
from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. The meeting is partially Closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 28, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-02304 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
86 So.2d 909

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael CALLIA and George Habeney.

No. 42664.

Feb. 20, 1956.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1956.

Byrnes & Wallace, George J. Gulotta, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant, Michael Callia.

David A. Neuhauser, Milo B. Williams, New Orleans, for appellant, George Habeney.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon D. Hubert, *797Jr., Dist. Atty., Edward A. Haggerty, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., James C. Garrison, Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for appellee.

PONDER, Justice.

The defendants are appealing from a conviction and sentence under a bill of information charging them with conducting the business of gambling in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:90 by the operation of a lottery at 3703 Third Street in the City of New Orleans.

During the course of the trial, there were thirty-five bills of exception taken to the rulings of the trial judge. These bills of exception were taken to the overruling of a motion for a bill of particulars, a motion to quash, a demurrer, a plea to the jurisdiction, objection to the admission of evidence, a motion for a new trial and a motion in arrest of judgment.

All of the questions raised in these bills of exception were raised and passed on in the case of State v. Mills, 229 La. 758, 86 So.2d 895. It could serve no useful purpose to reiterate the questions raised and the conclusions reached by this Court because the same conclusions would necessarily have to be reached in this case.

For the reasons assigned, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

POURNET, C. J., and MOISE, J., absent.