### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 

### and , HgP, and Hg+2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

113 Cholla 4Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in Question 16 (page 17) of the questionnaireEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

113 Cholla 4

M5B/OTM28/M29 R1 4/27/2010 9:19 M5B/OTM28/M29 R2 4/28/2010 9:38 M5B/OTM 28 R3 4/29/2010 8:40 M29 R3 4/29/2010 14:11 M26A R1 4/29/2010 8:40 M26A R2 4/29/2010 12:45 M26A R3 4/29/2010 17:20 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm)

4/27/2010 14:31 27 4/28/2010 16:28 16.6 4/29/2010 13:32 24.9 4/29/2010 18:57 20.6 4/29/2010 12:18 23.5 4/29/2010 17:00 18.1 4/29/2010 20:57 23.7

Test End Time Test End DateBasis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL)

Dry U.S. EPA Method 10A ADL Dry U.S. EPA Method 10A ADL Dry U.S. EPA Method 10A ADL Dry U.S. EPA Method 10A ADL Dry U.S. EPA Method 10A ADL Dry U.S. EPA Method 10A ADL Dry U.S. EPA Method 10A ADL CO Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2

Method 10 not 10A 0.03 24 Method 10 not 10A 0.02 15 Method 10 not 10A 0.02 22 Method 10 not 10A 0.02 18 Method 10 not 10A 0.02 21 Method 10 not 10A 0.02 16 Method 10 not 10A 0.02 21 Calculated Emission Rate2641.2 4112.6 14.7 2526.3 3885.4 14.4 2652 4018.8 14 2655.8 4121.7 13.8 2649.8 4028.5 14.2 2659.6 4075.2 14.1 2636.5 4169.1 14.3 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%)16.3 5.19 880270 15.22 5.26 882951 14.67 5.35 883426 14.25 5.39 877893 14.65 5.36 886696 14.62 5.36 877924 13.97 5.41 882370 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type

121.8 399800 bitum inous 121 395200 bitum inous 119.5 409800 bitum inous 119 409800 bitum inous 120.2 410000 bitum inous 119.8 409800 bitum inous 120.3 409800 bitum inous Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate

lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel #1Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement Method Fuel #2Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #3Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Fuel #4Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 113 Cholla 4

M5B/OTM28/M29 R1 4/27/2010 9:19 4/27/2010 M5B/OTM28/M29 R2 4/28/2010 9:38 4/28/2010 M5B/OTM 28 R3 4/29/2010 8:40 4/29/2010 M29 R3 4/29/2010 14:11 4/29/2010 M26A R1 4/29/2010 8:40 4/29/2010 M26A R2 4/29/2010 12:45 4/29/2010 M26A R3 4/29/2010 17:20 4/29/2010

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value ppm Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
14:31 66.4 Dry U.S. EPA Method 6 16:28 71.2 Dry U.S. EPA Method 6 13:32 71 Dry U.S. EPA Method 6 18:57 66.3 Dry U.S. EPA Method 6 12:18 71.1 Dry U.S. EPA Method 6 17:00 67.3 Dry U.S. EPA Method 6 20:57 70.3 Dry U.S. EPA Method 6 Test End Time SO 2Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 ADL US EPA Method 6C 0.14 58.7 2641.2 ADL US EPA Method 6C 0.15 63.3 2526.3 ADL US EPA Method 6C 0.15 63.5 2652 ADL US EPA Method 6C 0.15 59.4 2655.8 ADL US EPA Method 6C 0.16 63.6 2649.8 ADL US EPA Method 6C 0.15 60.2 2659.6 ADL US EPA Method 6C 0.15 63.1 2636.5 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type
4112.6 14.7 16.3 5.19 880270 121.8 399800 bitum inous 3885.4 14.4 15.22 5.26 882951 121 395200 bitum inous 4018.8 14 14.67 5.35 883426 119.5 409800 bitum inous 4121.7 13.8 14.25 5.39 877893 119 409800 bitum inous 4028.5 14.2 14.65 5.36 886696 120.2 410000 bitum inous 4075.2 14.1 14.62 5.36 877924 119.8 409800 bitum inous 4169.1 14.3 13.97 5.41 882370 120.3 409800 bitum inous

Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type
lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel #1 Fuel #2 Fuel #3Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 113 Cholla 4

1 4/27/2010 9:43 2 4/27/2010 13:44 3 4/28/2010 9:27 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Measured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

4/27/2010 12:45 1.78 Dry 4/27/2010 16:58 2.13 Dry 4/28/2010 12:00 2.49 Dry

Test End Time Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results
Test End DatePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 1.44E-06 2629.2 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 1.73E-06 2650.9 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 2.02E-06 2612.3 Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate

4094.8 15.5 16.47 5.18 849901 123.8 400000 4168.1 15.4 14.88 5.2 855052 123.4 399000 4082.6 15.2 15.75 5.15 840622 122.8 400200 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate
bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng)
OL67049 365.4 2.76 368.16 250 118.16 OL65957 387.2 3.81 391.01 250 141.01 OL65822 410.6 3.27 413.87 250 163.87 Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

0.06786 1.01% 0.76% 1.74 OL67097 0.06659 0.88% 0.98% 2.12 OL67065 0.06709 0.13% 0.80% 2.44 OL67064

0.06718 ≤20% of field recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm Trap #1Section 1

Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit
122.86 1.22 124.08 0 124.08 0.06799 1.21% 140.96 1.54 142.5 0 142.5 0.06669 0.73% 168.41 1.23 169.64 0 169.64 0.06711 0.10%

0.067263 ≤20% of field recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

0.99% 1.82 0.0837 2.3482 3.60 1.09% 2.14 0.0192 0.4505 3.74 0.73% 2.53 0.0853 1.7152 3.64 Me asured Spike Recovery ( R ) Paired Trap Agreement (RD)

≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or
≤20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm:R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) Limit

97.73% 99.49% 97.71% Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

98.31%EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

113 Cholla 4

1 4/27/2010 15:27 4/27/2010

2 4/28/2010 17:01 4/28/2010

3 4/29/2010 19:35 4/29/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (μg/m3) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

17:34 [<67.3]

Dry U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033)

18:44 [<73.8]

Dry U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033)

21:20 [<77.3]

Dry U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033)

67.3 73.8 77.3 Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments

BDL MDL = 0.0143

ug/ml and 1165 mlsolution and 5 dilution factor 1165 x 0.0143 x 5 = 83.3 ug [<5.5e-5] 2653.4 4153.8 14.8 14.63

BDL MDL = 0.0143

ug/ml and 1270 mlsolution and 5 dilution factor 1270 x 0.0143 x 5 = 90.8 ug [<6.0e-5] 2643.2 3944.7 14.8 14.98

BDL MDL = 0.0143

ug/ml and 1300 mlsolution and 5 dilution factor 1300 x 0.0143 x 5 = 93 ug [<6.4e-5] 2632 4131 14.6 14.17

5.48E-05 6.02E-05 6.36E-05 Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate

5.22 865717.6 122 399000 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation

5.24 860553.8 121.9 409400 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation

5.39 846675.9 121.2 409800 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method

Spike recovery passed at 107%. Matrix Spike duplicate recovery passed at 7%. pH > 12 at test site but less than 12 when received by

lab.

pH > 12 at test site but less than 12 when received by

lab.

pH > 12 at test site but less than 12 when received by

lab. Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 113 Cholla 4

M5B/OTM28/M29 R1 4/27/2010 9:19 M5B/OTM28/M29 R2 4/28/2010 9:38 M5B/OTM 28 R3 4/29/2010 8:40 M29 R3 4/29/2010 14:11 M26A R1 4/29/2010 8:40 M26A R2 4/29/2010 12:45 M26A R3 4/29/2010 17:20

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMe asured NO (ppm)
4/27/2010 14:31 118.2 4/28/2010 16:28 118.5 4/29/2010 13:32 119.1 4/29/2010 18:57 116.8 4/29/2010 12:18 119.4 4/29/2010 17:00 117.4 4/29/2010 20:57 116.1

Test End Time Test End DateMeasured NO 2(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Dry U.S. EPA Method 7 Dry U.S. EPA Method 7 Dry U.S. EPA Method 7 Dry U.S. EPA Method 7 Dry U.S. EPA Method 7 Dry U.S. EPA Method 7 Dry U.S. EPA Method 7 NOXEmission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments (lb/mmBtu)

ADL 7E 0.18 ADL 7E 0.18 ADL 7E 0.19 ADL 7E 0.18 ADL 7E 0.19 ADL 7E 0.18 ADL 7E 0.18 Total NOXCalculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2 105 2641.2 4112.6 14.7 16.3 5.19 105 2526.3 3885.4 14.4 15.22 5.26 106 2652 4018.8 14 14.67 5.35 105 2655.8 4121.7 13.8 14.25 5.39 107 2649.8 4028.5 14.2 14.65 5.36 105 2659.6 4075.2 14.1 14.62 5.36 104 2636.5 4169.1 14.3 13.97 5.41 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate 880270 121.8 399800 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation 882951 121 395200 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation 883426 119.5 409800 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation 877893 119 409800 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation 886696 120.2 410000 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation 877924 119.8 409800 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation 882370 120.3 409800 bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 113 Cholla 4

M5B/OTM28/M29 R1 4/27/2010 9:19 M5B/OTM28/M29 R2 4/28/2010 9:38 M5B/OTM 28 R3 4/29/2010 8:40

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeTotal Dissolved Solids (mg solids/liter) Total Suspended Solids (mg solids/liter)
4/27/2010 14:31 16305 286000 4/28/2010 16:28 6418 253000 4/29/2010 13:32 12188 249000

11637 262666.6667 Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL)
Standard Test Method for Filterable and Nonfilterable Matter in W ater ASTM D5907 ADL Standard Test Method for Filterable and Nonfilterable Matter in W ater ASTM D5907 ADL Standard Test Method for Filterable and Nonfilterable Matter in W ater ASTM D5907 ADL Constisuent Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments Fuel Input Rate

2641.2 4112.6 880270 121.8 399800 2526.3 3885.4 882951 121 395200 2652 4018.8 883426 119.5 409800 Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate

bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation bitum inous lb/hour boiler efficiency calculation Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4Other Supporting Information