alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 47 

Expressing the need for the Senate to provide advice and consent to 

ratification of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2023 

Ms. STANSBURY (for herself, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. 

BONAMICI, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. NORTON, Ms. LEE of 

Pennsylvania, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. SCHIFF, and Ms. TLAIB) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the need for the Senate to provide advice and 

consent to ratification of the United Nations Convention 

on Biological Diversity. 

Whereas human actions are contributing to an unprecedented 

and increasing loss of biodiversity worldwide; 

Whereas nearly 1,000,000 species could be threatened with 

extinction; 

Whereas every United Nations member state has ratified the 

Convention on Biological Diversity, done at Rio de Janeiro June 5, 1992, with the exception of the United States; 

Whereas the United States signed the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1993 but has not ratified the treaty; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HCON 47 IH 

Whereas the United States, under current domestic law, is already legally compliant with the obligations of the Convention; 

Whereas Federal agencies often design their plans to align 

with Convention on Biological Diversity initiatives; 

Whereas the absence of the United States from the Convention on Biological Diversity limits the United States to 

holding the status of an ‘‘observer’’ to deliberations and 

decision making processes of the Convention on Biodiversity; 

Whereas, not being party to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the United States does not have a vote within the 

convention, which diminishes our voice and influence; 

Whereas the decisions and rules made by the Convention on 

Biological Diversity affect both national security and economic interests of the United States in spite of the 

United States non-party status; 

Whereas the United States is one of the world’s largest contributors in international conservation funding and biological diversity expertise; and 

Whereas we are inextricably interconnected on this planet, 

and the work of the Convention on Biological Diversity 

has a direct impact on all Americans: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is in the national interest for the Sen3 ate to provide its advice and consent for the ratification 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HCON 47 IH 

1 of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which was 

2 signed by the United States in New York on June 4, 1993. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

**Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program**
                - Title V, Part A of the Higher Education Act, as amended ( 20 U.S.C. 1101-1101d; 1103-1103g ) 

## Regulations

                - 34 CFR Part 606
                - The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99 apply to both programs.

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
28.313 Contract clauses for insurance of transportation or transportation-related services. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.228-9, Cargo Insurance, in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services, except when freight is shipped under rates subject to released or declared value.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as that at 52.228-10, Vehicular and General Public Liability Insurance, in solicitations and contracts for transportation or for transportation-related services when the contracting officer determines that vehicular liability or general public liability insurance required by law is not sufficient.
#### 2830.201 Contract requirements.
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting From: Martha Keating To: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2008 - 0699 Date: January 21, 2015 On January 21, 2015 , EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe, met with Mr. Greg Abel of Berkshire Hathaway. Mr. Able discussed Berkshire Hathaway’ s comments on the 111(d) Clean Power Plan (see Dockets EPA HQ - OAR - 2013 - 0602 , EPA - HQ - OAR - 2013 - 0603, and EPA - HQ - OAR - 2013 - 0495 ) and offered preliminary thoughts on the Agency’s November 25 , 2015 , proposed revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone.
22.404-9 Award of contract without required wage determination. ( a ) If a contract is awarded without the required wage determination (i.e., incorporating no determination, containing a clearly inapplicable general wage determination, or containing a project determination which is inapplicable because of an inaccurate description of the project or its location), the contracting officer shall initiate action to incorporate the required determination in the contract immediately upon discovery of the error. If a required wage determination (valid determination in effect on the date of award) is not available, the contracting officer shall expeditiously request a wage determination from the Department of Labor, including a statement explaining the crcumstances and giving the date of the contract award.
( b ) The contracting officer shall— ( 1 ) Modify the contract to incorporate the required wage determination (retroactive to the date of award), and equitably adjust the contract price if appropriate; or
( 2 ) Terminate the contract.
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard S. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|/s/RICHARD S. ANDERSONRichard S. Anderson Chief Financial OfficerDecember 6, 2002 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
# C_2018001EN.01000501.xml

| 4.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 January 2018

(2018/C 1/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2023 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4442 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8250 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1736 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7440 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,545 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,29 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1652 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6355 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5303 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5339 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5047 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3985 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6942 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5988 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 281,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8845 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8168 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4410 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 176,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8272 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,988 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,0962 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,110 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9236 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,3835 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,3455 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2023

JPY

Japanese yen

134,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4442

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88640

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8250

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1736

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7440

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,545

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,29

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1652

RON

Romanian leu

4,6355

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5303

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5339

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5047

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3985

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6942

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5988

KRW

South Korean won

1 281,39

ZAR

South African rand

14,8845

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8168

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4410

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 176,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8272

PHP

Philippine peso

59,988

RUB

Russian rouble

69,0962

THB

Thai baht

39,110

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9236

MXN

Mexican peso

23,3835

INR

Indian rupee

76,3455

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 185 Filed: 09/12/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:2710
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 185 Filed: 09/12/18 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:2711
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 185 Filed: 09/12/18 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:2712
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 185 Filed: 09/12/18 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:2713
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 185 Filed: 09/12/18 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:2714
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 185 Filed: 09/12/18 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:2715
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Nos. 33-31298, 33-85020, 333-39499 and 333-80079 of Silicon Valley Group, Inc.
on Forms S-8 of our report dated October 25, 1999 appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Silicon Valley Group, Inc. for the year ended September
30, 1999.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
------------------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
December 20, 1999
#### 2815.604 Agency points of contact.

Each contracting activity shall designate a point of contact for the receipt and handling of unsolicited proposals. Generally, the official designated shall be the BPC or immediate subordinate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MICHELE F. O'BRYAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 12 C 5305

)

POSTRACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., )

DONALD HEIDRICH, MARK AUBRY, )

WILLIAM WASHBURN and STEVEN )

GONZALO, )

)

Defendants. )

______________________________________ )

)

POSTRACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., )

)

Counter-Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHELE F. O'BRYAN and DOUGLAS )

SPITZ, )

)

 Counter and )

Third-Party Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

PosTrack Technologies, Inc. ("PosTrack"), one of the defendants in this action brought by

Michele O'Bryan ("O'Bryan"), has coupled its Second Amended Answer to O'Bryan's Complaint

with counterclaims against O'Bryan and Douglas Spitz ("Spitz," who is not otherwise a party to

this litigation). Spitz has responded with a self-prepared Answer that does not deal in specific

terms with PosTrack's allegations. Instead he flatly "den[ies] all allegations (General Denial)

inclusive of jurisdiction." What he does state in detail is a total absence of contacts on his part
with Illinois, except for "traveling twice to the PosTrack office in Illinois as an employee." 

This Court will treat Spitz' filing as a motion for his dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(b)(2). PosTrack is ordered to file a submission on or before January 17, 2013 that supports

haling Virginia resident Spitz into this jurisdiction to address its claims against him. If it does

not do so in timely fashion, Spitz will be dismissed as a third-party defendant, but if it does

provide a response this Court will determine what further proceedings are appropriate as to Spitz.

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: January 8, 2013

- 2 -
#### 225.870-8 Industrial security.

Industrial security for Canada shall be in accordance with the U.S.-Canada Industrial Security Agreement of March 31, 1952, as amended.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20719 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARCOS ANTONIO GRANADO-VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-65-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marcos Antonio Granado-Valdez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10.5
                                                                    ------------




DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2005
-------------------------------------

     For fiscal year 2005, the Company will pay to all directors an annual
compensation retainer of $16,000 and also provide supplemental life insurance
coverage in varying amounts. In addition, directors who are not officers of the
Company will receive $1,000 for each meeting attended. Directors who serve as
the chair of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee receive additional
annual compensation of $8,000 and $3,000, respectively. Under the terms of the
Company's 1999 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the "1999 Director Plan"),
each outside director of the Company also receives a grant of 5,000 stock
options on the date of his initial election to the board of directors and a
grant of 2,000 stock options on the date of each annual meeting of shareholders
if his term in office is continued. The outside directors are also eligible for
the award of common stock in lieu of cash fees under the terms of the 1999
Director Plan.
## Timeline

Next competition: FY 2025Application available:  To be determined (for eligible HBCU institutions only)Application deadline: To be determined

Last competition: FY 2022

## Federal Register Notice

- To be determined 

## Current Application

The Title III, HBCU Programs, Parts B/F, Phase I of the FY 2024 data collection is due date is TBD. Phase II of the FY 2025 application process for the HBCU Programs due date TBD For any questions, please contact Wendy Lawrence, HBCU Program Manager, at wendy.lawrence@ed.gov or 202-453-7821.

- FY 2024 Phase I Data Worksheet due TBD in 2024 
- Archived FY 2022 Application Package for HBCU, PART B Program     PDF  (667K)

If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll-free, at 1-800-877-8339.

## Application Contact

Wendy Lawrence, (202) 453-7821HBCU Program ManagerU.S. Department of EducationOffice of Postsecondary EducationHigher Education Programs | Institutional Service | Historically Black Colleges and Universities Division 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., | LBJ-HEP – 5th Floor Washington, D.C. 20202

Institutional Service Home
Honorable Frank X. Vance

Counts Attornev Medins County " Hondo, Texas Ooinion Number O-1731 Rk: Whether or not'there is legal authority requrring only a majority vote cast in favor of bond issue to carry election for issuance of bonds. Dear Sir:

Your letter of November twenty-second,requesting an opinion of this department on the above question,has been received. We quote from your letter as follows:

"Withina few days therewill be a Commissioners' Precinct bond election to decide whether thatprecinct can issue bonds (taxbonds) for.the purpose of'improving lateralroads, to build a new bridge and buy the necessary right-of-way to straighten outHighwayNo. 90 through the Town of Castroville. It is doubtful if there will be two-thirdsof the votes cast in favor of the bonds but everyone feels confident that a majority of the votes cast will be in favor of the bonds. "Wouldyou advise if there is legal authorityrequiring only amajority of votes cast in favor of such a bond issue of thisnature to carry the election in favor of issuing the bonds? It seems that underArticle 752a through 752h, a two-thirdsmajority is necessary.' The statutory authority for the issuance of road bonds is found under Title 22, Chapter 3, of theRevised Civil Statutes of Texas.Article 752h, reads .asfollows:

"If at such election two-thirds of theproperty taxpaying voters, voting at such election, cast theirballots in favor of the,issuance of bonds, the Commissioners'Court shall, as soon thereafter as practicable, issue said bonds on the faith and credit of said county, or political subdivision or road district, as the casemay be." Trusting that the above satisfactorilyanswersyour inquiry, we are Very truly yours COB-s/mm ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TIZAS APRROVED Dec.7,1939 s/,GERALD C.MANN By~(Signed) CLAUD 0. BOOTHMAN,Assistant ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
A-xxm DXXERAL 

Honorable James E. Kilday, Director 

Xotor Transportation Division 

Rsllroad Commission of Texas 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sirs Opinion No. O-2310 

Re: Whether Railroad Commission 

should collect lO$ of total consideration for lease of certificate at ii?6 inception, or on 

monthly payments as they are made. 

In your letter of April 29,,1!3&0, you advise that the Rallroad Commission has just approved an application to lease a cergificate 

of convenience and necessity for a period of five years from April 1, 

1940, the applicat+on ahowIng the coneideratlon to be Sixty (qi60.00) 

Dollars per month rental. You request our opinion as to whe&her.or not, 

in collecting the ten (lC$) per cent highway fee required td be paid in 

ic Section of Article glib, Vernon's Civil Statutes you should collect 

,ten (10s per sent: of' Three Thousand Six Hundred (ji3,600,00) Dollars ln 

one sum, the consideration for the full term of the lease,, or tahether 

- you should collect.just ten (10%) per chnt of,tha Sixty (460.00) 'Dollar 

monthly rental as (it la paid. 

In s&ion 5 of Article glib, Vernon's Civil Statutes 

latlng to common aarrier motor carrler0, it is provided that "in c&z", 

certificate is transferred, that the transferee shall pay to the Cpmmiaslon 

a sum of' money equal to ten (10s) per cent of the amount paid as a conalderatlon for the transfer of the certificate." In our Opinion No. O-1505,- 

it was held that this provision appllea to the lease of aertfflcates of 

convenience and necessity. It Is noted that under the terms of the 

statute, the ten (10s) per cent required to be oollected ia upon the 

amount a, not t$n (10s) per cent of the amount agreed to be paid. If 

the full ten (10s) per cent of the consideration provided to be paid 

over the full period should be collected in advance, and ,If the lease 

should be terminated by either or both of the parties before the end of 

the lease period, and the monthly payments cease, the State would have 

collected more than ten (10s) per oent of the amount paid a8 a consideration for the lease. We do not believe the statute waa meant to make 

possible such a situation as fha,t. In our opinion, said ten (10%) per 

cent should be collected only as the monthly lease payments mre made. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNH GEZ?EMLOF~S 

GRLrRS:wc By s/ Glenn R. Lewis 

Glenn R. Lewis 

Assistant 

Attorney General of Texas 

= .-._._,^^ ?4..-4 .!-+a- mr RWR Chairman
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 15 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 15

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule submitted by the Director of the 
  Bureau of Land Management relating to resource management planning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2017

Ms. Murkowski (for herself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
Daines, Mr. Enzi, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Flake, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Heller, Mr. 
 Inhofe, Mr. Lee, Mr. McCain, Mr. Risch, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Hatch, and 
 Mr. Sasse) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule submitted by the Director of the 
  Bureau of Land Management relating to resource management planning.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
final rule submitted by the Director of the Bureau of Land Management 
relating to resource management planning (81 Fed. Reg. 89580 (December 
12, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### 22.1502 Policy.

Agencies must take appropriate action to enforce the laws prohibiting the manufacture or importation of products that have been mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced or indentured child labor, consistent with 19 U.S.C. 1307, 29 U.S.C. 201, *et seq.,* and 41 U.S.C. chapter 65. Agencies should make every effort to avoid acquiring such products.

[79 FR 24208, Apr. 29, 2014]
#### In the Matter of Maurice Edelbaum, an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement to the Bar granted. Concur— Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 159 Filed: 08/05/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1381
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 159 Filed: 08/05/14 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:1382
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 159 Filed: 08/05/14 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:1383
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 159 Filed: 08/05/14 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:1384
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 159 Filed: 08/05/14 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:1385
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 159 Filed: 08/05/14 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:1386
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 159 Filed: 08/05/14 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:1387