alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home About Us Moneris Solutions USA

About Us

Moneris Solutions USA

Employment Opportunities

Moneris Canada

Privacy Policy

Testimonials

About Moneris Solutions USA

Processing Over 3 Billion Credit & Debit Transactions Per Year

Moneris: A Company with Strength, Pedigree, and the Most Diverse Services in the Industry

Moneris Solutions® was established in December of 2000 as a joint investment between the Royal

Bank of Canada and the Bank of Montreal. Moneris' U.S. operations are based out of

Schaumburg, IL and were originally known as Harris Bank Merchant Services/The Charge-It

System.

The Royal Bank of Canada is Canada's largest financial institution operating under the brand

name RBC Financial with over 60,000 employees and more than 12,000,000 personal, business,

and public sector clients in over 30 countries.

The Bank of Montreal is one of the largest financial institutions in North America. The BMO

Financial Group, has more than 1,100 bank branches with over 7,000,000 personal and

commercial customers throughout Canada and the United States.

Consequently, Moneris has the parentage and staying power fundamentally necessary for

providing the highest quality merchant services solutions in North America.

Moneris processes more than 3 billion credit and debit card transactions a year, for over 350,000

merchant locations across North America. These transactions originate from cards, the Internet,

and point of sale terminals. Additionally, Moneris designs and deploys proprietary turnkey solutions

for retail, business to business, and business to government merchants.

Moneris owns and operates its own payment processing and technology development platforms in

addition to subsequent back office processing relationships with both First Data and TSYS in the

U.S.

Moneris has built its reputation on its quality of services, personal attention to client needs, and the

trust our customers have in us. Our clients know what they want and expect from us...and they

always have and always will get it. But don’t take our word for it, read our client history and

testimonials. No one can tell you more about what we do than the people we’ve served.

Request A Quote

Obtain a quote for an account 

eSELECTplus Web Based POS

Learn More About eSELECTplus 

Related Links

Point of Sale Solutions

Point of Sale Terminals

eSELECTplus Web Based POS

The Moneris Advantage

Moneris USA Customer Service

Copyright © 2012 Moneris Solutions. All rights reserved Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map

Product & Services Industry Solutions Partners Support About Us

UNITED STATES CONTACT US SUPPORT SEARCH

Moneris Solutions USA http://www.monerisusa.com/about/moneris-usa.aspx

1 of 1 8/15/12 9:27 PM

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-32 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:987
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-32 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:988
### Docket ID: FAA

- 2015

- 3632 Dir No: 2015

- NM

- 023

- AD

. C on t acts. W ith w h o m o u tside t he F A A h a s th i s prop os al been di s cu s sed?

Organ i zat i on P erson C ont a cted D ate R e s pon s e

N at i o n a l B u s ine s s Air c r af t As s o ci at i o n E li C ott i 2 / 23 / 1 5

Re g i o n a l Airline A ss o ci at i o n 2 / 23 / 1 5

Air c r af t O w ners & P il ot s A s s o ci at i o n R o bert Ha ck m a n 2 / 23 / 1 5

Airlines fo r A m e r ica R o bert I r e l a nd 2 / 23 / 1 5
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: September 8, 2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: EPA Region 1

SUBJECT: September 8, 2014, Meeting with Maine State Staff Regarding Proposed Carbon 

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on September 8, 2014 to 

discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. Discussion covered 

applicability and crediting of renewable energy. 

ATTENDEES (all by phone)

Eric Kennedy

Erle Townsend

Jaime Farrin

Marc Cone

EPA: 

Shutsu Wong

Cynthia Greene

Dave Conroy

Jenny Noonan

Gabrielle Stevens

Matt Clouse

Brian Fisher

Christian Fellner

Questions from the state are attached.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 298 

Supporting the designation of September 2017 as ‘‘National Alcohol and 

Drug Addiction Recovery Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2017 

Mr. KING (for himself and Mrs. CAPITO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of September 2017 as ‘‘National 

Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month’’. 

Whereas September has been declared ‘‘National Alcohol and 

Drug Addiction Recovery Month’’; 

Whereas the theme for National Alcohol and Drug Addiction 

Recovery Month in 2017 is ‘‘Join the Voices for Recovery: Strengthen Families and Communities’’; 

Whereas drug overdose is the leading cause of accidental 

death in the United States, with more than 63,000 lethal 

drug overdoses in 2016 or approximately 170 lethal drug 

overdoses per day in 2016; 

Whereas drug overdose is now the leading cause of death in 

individuals in the United States under age 50; and 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 298 ATS 

Whereas the motto of National Alcohol and Drug Addiction 

Recovery Month is ‘‘Prevention Works—Treatment is Effective—People Recover’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate joins the voices for recov2 ery to strengthen families and communities by— 

3 (1) recognizing the importance of education and 

4 prevention of substance use disorder and the critical 

5 importance and effectiveness of treatment for sub6 stance use disorder; 

7 (2) recognizing the possibility of recovery from 

8 substance use disorder in this and every month; and 

9 (3) honoring and celebrating— 

10 (A) the achievements of the more than 

11 25,000,000 people of the United States who are 

12 in recovery from substance use disorder; and 

13 (B) the tens of millions of recovery allies 

14 who support those people. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
# CCAMPIS-FY2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          16,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  308,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (48,600)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,666,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,688,900
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,666,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               221,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 19 (Monday, February 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02150]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

DATES AND TIMES:  Monday, February 8, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.; and Tuesday, 
February 9, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.

PLACE:  Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza SW, in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

STATUS:  Monday, February 8, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.--Closed; Tuesday, 
February 9, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.--Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Monday, February 8, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial and Operational Matters.
    3. Compensation and Personnel Matters.
    4. Administrative Items.

Tuesday, February 9, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. (Open)

    1. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board of Governors.
    2. Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board.
    3. Remarks of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board.
    4. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.
    5. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meetings.
    6. Committee Reports.
    7. Quarterly Financial Report.
    8. Quarterly Service Performance Report.
    9. Approval of Tentative Agendas for May Meetings.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Michael J. Elston, Secretary of 
the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02150 Filed 1-28-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) by and between Mylan
Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), and Heather Bresch (the “Executive”) is made as
of August 31, 2009.



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Executive Employment
Agreement dated as of January 31, 2007, as amended to date (the “Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend and extend the term of Agreement, as set
forth below;



     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:



     1. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety to read as
follows:




     Effective Date; Term of Employment. This Agreement shall commence and be
effective as of the date hereof and shall remain in effect, unless earlier terminated or
extended or renewed, as provided in Section 8 of this Agreement, through August 31, 2012.



     2. Section 9(e) of the Agreement is hereby amended such that the reference to “the Third
Anniversary” shall henceforth be to “August 31, 2012”.



     3. This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under and construed in accordance with the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.



     4. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all
of which shall constitute the same document.



     5. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby confirmed in all respects.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered as of the date and the
year first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	MYLAN INC.

	 	EXECUTIVE	 
	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 /s/ Robert J. Coury

	 	/s/ Heather Bresch	 
	 	 

	 	 	 
	 	 Robert J. Coury 

Title: Chairman and CEO

	 	Heather Bresch
#### 2952.243-70 Contractor's Obligation to Notify the Contracting Officer of a Request to Change the Contract Scope (Contractor's Obligation Clause).

As prescribed in 2943.104-70, insert the following clause:

# Contractor's Obligation To Notify the Contracting Officer of a Request To Change the Contract Scope (Contractor's Obligation Clause) (JAN 2012)

(a) Except for changes identified in writing and signed by the contracting officer, the contractor is required to notify, within 5 working days of receipt or knowledge, any request for changes to this contract (including actions, inactions, and written or oral communications) that the contractor regards as exceeding the scope of the contract. On the basis of the most accurate information available to the contractor, the notice shall state:

(1) The date, nature, and circumstances of the conduct regarded as a change in scope;

(2) The name, function, and activity of each Government employee and contractor official or employee involved in, or knowledgeable about, such conduct; and

(3) The identification of any documents and substance of any oral communication involved in such conduct.

(b) Following submission of this notice, the contractor shall continue performance in accordance with the contract terms and conditions, unless notified otherwise by the contracting officer.

(c) The contracting officer shall promptly, within 5 business days after receipt of notice from the contractor, respond to the notice in writing. In responding, the contracting officer shall either:

(1) Confirm that the contractor's notice identifies a change in the scope of the contract and directs the contractor to stop work, completely or in part, in accordance with the Stop Work provisions of the contract;

(2) Deny that the contractor's notice identifies a change in scope and instruct the contractor to continue performance under the contract; or

(3) In the event the contractor's notice does not provide sufficient information to make a decision, advise the contractor what additional information is required, and establish the date by which it should be furnished and the date thereafter by which the Government will respond.

(End of Clause)
225.7017-3 Exceptions. DoD requires the contractor to utilize domestic photovoltaic devices in covered contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, with the following exceptions: ( a ) *Qualifying country.* Qualifying country photovoltaic devices may be utilized in any covered contract, because 225.103(a)(i)(A) provides an exception to the Buy American statute for products of qualifying countries, as defined in 225.003.
( b ) *Buy American—unreasonable cost.* For a covered contract that utilizes photovoltaic devices valued at less than $174,000, the exception for unreasonable cost may apply (see FAR 25.103(c)). If the cost of a foreign photovoltaic device plus 50 percent is less than the cost of a domestic photovoltaic device, then the foreign photovoltaic device may be utilized.
( c ) *Trade agreements* — ( 1 ) *Free Trade Agreements.* For a covered contract that utilizes photovoltaic devices , photovoltaic devices may be utilized from a country covered under the acquisition by a Free Trade Agreement, depending upon dollar threshold (see FAR subpart 25.4).
( 2 ) *World Trade Organization—Government Procurement Agreement.* For covered contracts that utilize photovoltaic devices that are valued at $174,000 or more, only U.S.-made photovoltaic devices, designated country photovoltaic devices, or qualifying country photovoltaic devices may be utilized.
[83 FR 62500, Dec. 4, 2018, as amended at 84 FR 72247, Dec. 31, 2019; 86 FR 74377, Dec. 30, 2021; 89 FR 20873, Mar. 26, 2024]
p.1 

OAR Box 1394 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

55) ll-C-25 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/3/2008 7:52:01 AM Sheet 55 of 56 
P.2 

A44-52 

I-C-25 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Reinforced Plastic Composites NESHAP Pre-MACT Team 

Members 

FROM: Greg LaFlam 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

DATE: May 3, 1995 

L:\N308 

SUBJECT: Vendor Pre-MACT Teleconference 

The purpose of this memorandum is tb announce the date and 

time for the next pre-MACT teleconference. The meeting will be 

held on: 

May 24, 1995 

at 1:00-4:00 pm EDT. 

The conference phone number is (919) 541-1996. 

This meeting of the pre-MACT team will feature presentations 

by four vendors of add-on technologies for control of styrene 

emissions from composite fabrication processes. 

We are planning to FAX or mail a brief agenda for the 

meeting and the vendor "fact sheets" to each team member as soon 

as they have all been received from the vendors. This will 

orient the team to these technologies and should facilitate a 

productive dialogue on their applicability to this source 

category. 

If you have any questions at any time prior to the meeting, 

please contact Greg LaFlam at PES at (919) 941-0333, or Ellen 

Ducey of EPA at (919) 541-5408.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Francis BANVILLE, a/k/a Rich Banville, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50088.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 4, 2008.*

Filed June 6, 2008.

Michael J. Raphael, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Terri K Flynn, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard Francis Banville, Taft, CA, pro se.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, ALDISERT ** and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Ruggero J. Aldisert, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

A criminal defendant’s assertion of his right to self-representation must be (1) knowing and intelligent; (2) timely and not for the purpose of delay; and (3) unequivocal. *Adams v. Carroll,*875 F.2d 1441, 1442 (9th Cir.1989). The district court did not clearly err in finding that Richard Banville’s request to represent himself on the first day of trial was made for the purpose of delay.

In reviewing the denial of a motion to substitute counsel, this court considers (1) the timeliness of the motion; (2) the adequacy of the court’s inquiry into the defendant’s complaint; and (3) whether the conflict between the defendant and counsel was so great that it resulted in a total lack of communication preventing an adequate legal defense. *See, e.g., United States v. George,*85 F.3d 1433, 1438 (9th Cir.1996). Here, as in *George,*“it is clear that this motion was untimely (the day of trial), the district court made adequate inquiry, and there was no total lack of communication.” *Id.*at 1439.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****CBO�s economic forecastingrecord.**
 
2002| 2004 | 2005 | 2007| 2009| 2010 | 2013 | 2015 | 2017 | 2019
 
SuDoc Number:Y 10.27:
Item Number:1005-C-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000712102
 
January 14, 2020
**Program Office:**Institutional Service

**CFDA Number:** 84.031B**Program Type:** Discretionary Grants**Also Known As:**HBCUs

Program Description

Title III-B authorizes the  Strengthening Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) program  award grants to eligible institutions to assist them in strengthening their  academic, administrative, and fiscal capabilities.  These programs are typically funded through  annual discretionary appropriations; and with additional annual mandatory  appropriations provided through the FUTURE Act, which extended mandatory  funding beyond fiscal year 2019.

Activities  are In accordance to section 1068h(a)(2) of this title may include; Institution services; educational equipment,  acquisition of real property in connection with the construction, renovation,  or additional improvement of campus facilities; to improve the financial and economic  literacy designed for students; financial management information; faculty and staff  development; and the implementation of other project activities described under  the Legislative Allowable Activities (LAA) outlined in the program  statute.  Endowment development is also  an activity with exception that no more than twenty percent of the grant funds  may be used for this purpose.  

Types of Projects

Funds may be used for the purchase, rental, or lease of scientific or laboratory equipment.  Also supported are the construction, maintenance, renovation, and improvement of instruction facilities and physical plant.  Funds support faculty exchanges and the development of academic instruction in disciplines in which black Americans are underrepresented. Projects may support the purchase of library materials as well as tutoring, counseling, and STEM programs too.  Additionally supported are: funds and administrative management; joint use of facilities; establishment or improvement of development offices; establishment or enhancement of programs of teacher education; establishment of outreach programs; and other activities that a grantee proposes in its application that contribute to carrying out the purposes of the program and are approved by the Secretary as part of the review and acceptance of the grant application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      18,655,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,605,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,260,000
<PP&E>                                          33,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,293,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,018,000
<BONDS>                                      5,818,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,488,411
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,968,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,293,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               311,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               111,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             137,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        



</TABLE>
Additional	Information: Section	333	Exemption	Application	for	Commercial	Operations	of	Unmanned	Aircraft Filed	by	Eide	Communications,	Inc.	using	DJI	PHANTOM	2, DJI	INSPIRE	1,	DJI	S800,	Align	690L,	DJI	F550 ,	DJI	F450,	DJI	S900,	DJI	S1000

Charles	Eide