alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                              [BIOGEN LETTERHEAD]

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.48

                                         May 19, 1998
                                                           REVISED

Ms. Sylvie Gregoire
78 rue Charles Laffitte
92200 Neuilly Sur Seine
FRANCE


Dear Sylvie:

This letter confirms our discussion regarding your temporary transfer to the US
headquarters in the role of Program Executive. Your annual salary will be
$140,000 with continued participation in the Executive Bonus Plan. As in the
past, you will be eligible to receive a target bonus of fifteen (15) percent of
base salary.

To facilitate your move from Paris to Boston, a relocation package will be
provided which includes the movement of your household/personal effects, the
services of a relocation firm, and reimbursement of all reasonable expenses
associated with your move. This includes real-estate agent, legal and other
closing costs associated with the purchase of your new residence in the Boston
area; and up to 60 days temporary living in the Boston area pending the
availability of your new residence. To further assist you with your relocation,
Biogen will provide you with a one time relocation payment of $20,000.

You will be entitled to participate in the US benefits program and you will be
able to choose from a menu of benefit options through our flexible benefits
program, BioChoice. These include health care, life, dependent life, and
disability insurance as well as two flexible spending accounts, Med-Flex and
D-Flex, for eligible medical or dependent care expenses. At the beginning of the
calendar quarter following your date of transfer, you will be eligible to
participate in Biogen's pension and 401(k) savings plans. You are also entitled
to fifteen (15) vacation days. Biogen also offers a variety of additional
benefits including group homeowners and automobile insurance. As part of your
benefits package, Biogen will provide you assistance for tax planning and
support of your 1998 tax returns. Your eligibility for and participation in the
European benefit programs will cease upon your transfer to the US headquarters.

As discussed, upon your transfer to Cambridge, the Company will subsidize the
tuition costs for your son to attend the French school for up to two years
($8,500 per year).

To facilitate your temporary transfer to the US headquarters, Biogen will
provide counsel and assistance to you and your household members in securing the
necessary documentation to reside and work in the United States. I understand
Biogen's immigration counsel already has contacted you to address this matter.

On behalf of Jim Tobin, congratulations and best wishes for continued success at
Biogen.


                                        Sincerely,

                                        /s/ Frank A. Burke, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Frank A. Burke, Jr.
                                        Vice President, Human Resources

/bk
cc: Mr. James R. Tobin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>  0000018540
<NAME>  CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORTION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                       8,371
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                       171
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          1,681
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                          506
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                                  2,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 13,423
<COMMON>                                                          743
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                       1,039
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                             1,925
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                                  3,707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              28
<PREFERRED>                                                       500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                            3,932
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                          40
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                  1,108
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                     200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                           1
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                         7
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                    3
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                                  3,897
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                                  13,423
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                       2,462
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                               52
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                      2,114
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                      2,166
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                           296
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                                 15
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                                    311
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          206
<NET-INCOME>                                                      105
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                         7
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                                     108
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                          184
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                         112
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                            170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.51
        


</TABLE>
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 260 

Designating September 2017 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Mr. BOOKER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2017 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Whereas, every school day in the United States, approximately 500,000 public and private school buses carry 

more than 26,000,000 children to and from school; 

Whereas school buses comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the United States; 

Whereas 55 percent of all K–12 students ride a school bus, 

totaling 260,000,000 miles for each of the 180 school 

days in a year, or 46,800,000,000 miles driven annually; 

Whereas the Child Safety Network, celebrating 28 years of 

national public service, supports the CSN Safe Bus campaign, which is designed to provide the latest technology 

and free safety and security resources to the school bus 

industry; 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 260 ATS 

Whereas the designation of School Bus Safety Month will 

allow broadcast and digital media and social networking 

industries to make commitments to disseminate public 

service announcements that are produced in order to— 

(1) provide resources designed to safeguard children; 

and 

(2) recognize school bus drivers and professionals; 

Whereas key leaders who are deserving of recognition during 

School Bus Safety Month and beyond have provided security awareness training materials to more than 14,000 

public and private school districts, trained more than 

80,000 school bus operators, and provided more than 

80,000 counterterrorism guides to individuals who are 

key to providing both safety and security for children in 

the United States; and 

Whereas School Bus Safety Month offers the Senate and the 

people of the United States an opportunity to recognize 

and thank all of the school bus drivers in the United 

States and the professionals who are focused on school 

bus safety and security: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2017 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Integrative and Clinical Endocrinology and Reproduction Study Section, February 18, 2021, 09:00 a.m. to February 19, 2021, 07:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 22, 2021, 86 FR 6659.                

This notice is being amended to change the meeting date from 2/18/2021—2/19/2021 to 2/18/2021. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 2, 2021. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-02492 Filed 2-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

### Please see the  Department’s Official CARES Act: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund website  here, which contains the most updated information on the HEERF program

The purpose of this page  is to provide answers to the most frequent questions we have received from applicants thus far.  Our intent is to  update this page to clarify additional questions and respond to input as issues arise.

Cares Act HEERF Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Allison Bristol, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Madison County Court which denied appellant’s motion for a writ of error *coram nobis*after a hearing. Appellant’s first contention that he did not understand the nature of the charges against him and was mentally unable to defend himself is without merit. After approximately four and one-half months confinement in Matteawan State Hospital for treatment, appellant was returned to the Madison County Court upon the certificate of the Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital, pursuant to section 662-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, that appellant was "no longer in such a state of idiocy, imbecility or insanity as to be incapable of understanding the charge now pending in Madison County Court against him, or of making his defense thereto.” This report was not contested, and, while represented by retained counsel, appellant entered a plea of guilty to *994burglary in the third degree. Appellant’s second contention that his retained attorney promised him that if he would plead guilty he would be placed on probation, is also without merit, even if true, but the retained attorney denied under oath at the hearing that he ever made any such representation to the appellant. The lower court has decided this question of fact contrary to appellant’s contention. Order unanimously affirmed. Present—- Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 35 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 35

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2023

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for an event to celebrate a King Kamehameha Day Lei Draping Ceremony.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE A KING 
              KAMEHAMEHA DAY LEI DRAPING CEREMONY.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on June

              

 11, 2023, for an event to celebrate a King Kamehameha Day Lei Draping 
Ceremony.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### 326.603 Policy.
#### Concetta Demarco et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Sabation Frucchione, Appellant-Respondent.

— Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, entered May 9, 1978 in Fulton County, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs and directed a new trial. In this negligence action arising out of a rear-end collision between an automobile in which the plaintiff was a passenger and an automobile allegedly owned and driven by defendant, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant moved to set aside the verdict and dismiss the complaint upon the ground that plaintiffs had failed to elicit testimony directly identifying defendant as either the owner or driver of the vehicle which caused the accident. Following its review of the transcript of the testimony, the trial court granted defendant’s motion in part by setting aside the verdict, but ordered a new trial. Both parties have appealed. We affirm. CPLR 4404 (subd [a]) authorizes the trial court to set aside a jury verdict and order a new trial in the interest of justice. This power is discretionary in nature, "predicated on the assumption that the Judge who presides at trial is in the best position to evaluate errors therein”, and in exercising this power the court "must look to his own common sense, experience and sense of fairness rather than to precedents in arriving at a decision”. *(Micallef v Miehle Co., Div. of Miehle-Goss Dexter,*39 NY2d 376, 381.) Since there appears to be no testimony in the trial transcript in which defendant is pointed out and expressly identified as the driver of the vehicle which caused the accident, there is no basis for disturbing the court’s decision to set aside the verdict. Moreover, due to his presence during the opening statements and summations, which were not recorded, the Judge, using his common sense, experience and sense of fairness, could conclude that plaintiffs’ omission was due in large part to the posture assumed by defendant. While the failure of plaintiffs’ counsel to produce evidence which was apparently readily available should not be ignored, the trial court’s exercise of its discretionary power to set aside the verdict and order a new trial in the interest of justice should not be disturbed. Order afiirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Staley, Jr., Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

*Rehabilitation Act*

### As amended through P.L. 114–95, enacted December 10, 2015

The Rehabilitation Act replaces the Vocational Rehabilitation Act: 
                  - to extend and revise the authorization of grants to states for vocational rehabilitation services, with special emphasis on services to individuals with the most severe disabilities,
                  - to expand special federal responsibilities and research and training programs with respect to individuals with disabilities,
                  - to create linkage between state vocational rehabilitation programs and workforce investment activities carried out under title I of the *Workforce Investment Act* of 1998,
                  - to establish special responsibilities for the Secretary of Education for coordination of all activities with respect to individuals with disabilities within and across programs administered by the federal government,
                  - and for other purposes

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by title IV of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) (PDF 791KB) establishes programs and initiatives administered by the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA).

----

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
- Name
      - **Sarah Allan**
      - Address
      -  U.S. Department of Education, OSERS400 Maryland Ave., SW,  PCP 5160Washington, DC 20202  
      - Telephone
      - 202-245-7875
      - TDD
      - If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Protecting StudentsDisability DiscriminationIssues

*Students with disabilities who meet the academic and technical standards for admission to, or participation in, a postsecondary education program may receive academic modifications and auxiliary aids and services to ensure their equal opportunity to participate in the program.* 

----

 

              - Policy Guidance
              - Case Resolutions
              - Publications

### Policy Guidance

*No documents currently available; OCR may include relevant documents on this page in the future.*

 

Please see our Reading Room for a full list of guidance documents on issues related to Disability Discrimination.

### Case Resolutions

- View Disability Discrimination Case Resolutions

To access resolution agreements and letters created on or after October 1, 2013 click 	**here**or enter criteria in the search box below:          Keyword(s): Publications
- Post-Secondary Academic Adjustments    PDF  (4MB)

  Last Modified: 01/16/2020
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 51 

Agreeing that the Chinese Communist Party is the greatest threat to freedom 

and to the free world. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2023 

Mr. SANTOS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Agreeing that the Chinese Communist Party is the greatest 

threat to freedom and to the free world. 

Whereas it is the opinion of Congress that the Chinese Communist Party is the greatest threat to freedom and to the 

free world: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress agrees that the Chinese Com3 munist Party is the greatest threat to freedom and to the 

4 free world. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB