alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8588

WILLIAM BERNARD RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DON A. SWETTER, Dr; DR. OHAI; J. KENDRICKS,

Dr.; WARDEN JABE; R. SMITH, Shop Foreman,

Correctional Medical Service; W. P. WELCH,

Hospital Head, Deputy Warden; WARDEN BASS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-370-3)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Bernard Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. David Charles Bowen,

WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia; Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff Wayne

Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia Beach,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Randolph v. Swetter, No. CA-95-370-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 4,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Sylvia Taller, Also Known as Linda Taller, Respondent, v. Herman Taller, Also Known as Hernan Taller, Appellant.

In a proceeding to enforce a money judgment, the. judgment debtor appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, [Kings County, dated May 18, 1964, which *infer alia:*(1) adjudged him in».contempt of court for willful disobedience of a judicial direction *to*answer certain questions on his examination by the judgment creditor; and (2) provided that. he .“ may purge himself of said contempt ” *933by appearing before a named Special Referee on a specified date and answering all questions. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. The judgment debtor’s time to purge himself of the contempt by appearing, together with his books and records, before the Special Referee and answering all the questions, as directed by the order, is extended to January 18, 1965 or to such other date as the parties may mutually fix by written stipulation. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
# C_2017436EN.01000101.xml

| 16.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 December 2017

(2017/C 436/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1806 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4443 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88253 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9583 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1669 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7828 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,678 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2167 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6332 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5603 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5382 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5070 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2223 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6803 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5897 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 284,73 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7809 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8022 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5465 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 029,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8163 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,528 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,5043 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,375 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9171 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,6281 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,6085 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1806

JPY

Japanese yen

132,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4443

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88253

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9583

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1669

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7828

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,678

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2167

RON

Romanian leu

4,6332

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5603

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5382

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5070

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2223

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6803

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5897

KRW

South Korean won

1 284,73

ZAR

South African rand

15,7809

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8022

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5465

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 029,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8163

PHP

Philippine peso

59,528

RUB

Russian rouble

69,5043

THB

Thai baht

38,375

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9171

MXN

Mexican peso

22,6281

INR

Indian rupee

75,6085

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                             OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, being the duly elected and appointed chief executive officer and
chief financial officer of MPSI Systems Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), subject in all respects to the principle of "materiality" that is
inherent in financial reporting under generally accepting accounting principles,
and subject further to knowledge actually in their possession at the date of
this Certificate, hereby certify that:

         1. the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002, complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));

         2. the financial statements, including notes thereto and supplemental
information contained in various parts of such periodic report, fairly present,
in all material respects when considered in the context of the financial
statements taken as a whole, the financial condition, results of operations and
changes in cash flow of the Company for the indicated periods;


         Executed this 15th day of April, 2003.


                                        /s/ Ronald G. Harper
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Ronald G. Harper, Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ James C. Auten
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 James C. Auten, Chief Financial Officer
Case: 1:12-cv-02391 Document #: 3 Filed: 03/30/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:34
Functional Statements > Office for Civil Rights

## Sections

-  Mission and Responsibilities
-  Order of Succession
-  Organization
-  Functions and Responsibilities of OCR Components 
Immediate Office of the Assistant Secretary 
Metro Region 

----
# C_2019305EN.01000101.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2019/C 305/01)

Last publication

OJ C 295, 2.9.2019

Past publications

OJ C 288, 26.8.2019

OJ C 280, 19.8.2019

OJ C 270, 12.8.2019

OJ C 263, 5.8.2019

OJ C 255, 29.7.2019

OJ C 246, 22.7.2019

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 2852.222-70 Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking.

As prescribed in JAR 2822.101-70, insert the following clause:

# Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking (DEC 2014)

(a) It is DOJ policy to enhance workplace awareness of and safety for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. This policy is summarized in “*DOJ Policy Statement 1200.02, Federal Workforce Responses to Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking,”* available in full for public viewing at: *http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ovw/legacy/2013/12/19/federal-workplacee-responses-to-domesticeviolence-sexualassault-stalking.pdf.*

Vendor agrees, upon contract award, to provide notice of this Policy Statement, including at a minimum the above-listed URL, to all Vendor employees and employees of subcontractors who will be assigned to work on DOJ premises.

(b) Upon contract award, DOJ will provide the Contractor with the name and contact information of the point of contact for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking for the component or components where the Contractor will be performing. The Contractor agrees to inform its employees and employees of subcontractors, who will be assigned to work on DOJ premises, with the name and contact information of the point of contact for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking.

(End of Clause)

[87 FR 47118, Aug. 2, 2022; 87 FR 52485, Aug. 26, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 9, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02615]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 210

[Release No. 33-10876A; 34-90210A; FR-88A; IA-5613A; IC-34052A; File 
No. S7-26-19]
RIN 3235-AM63


Qualifications of Accountants

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes technical corrections to amendments to 
update certain auditor independence requirements adopted in Release No. 
33-10876 (October 16, 2020) (``Adopting Release''), which was published 
in the Federal Register on December 11, 2020.

DATES: Effective June 9, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Kim, Senior Special Counsel, 
Office of the Chief Accountant, at (202) 551-5300, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are making technical amendments to 
correct Sec.  210.2-01. Specifically, this document amends Instruction 
2 published in the Adopting Release. Instruction 2.c is amended to 
correct a citation to Sec.  210.2-01.
    In document FR doc. 2020-23364, which was published in the Federal 
Register on Friday, December 11, 2020, at 85 FR 80508, the following 
correction is made:


Sec.  210.2-01   [Corrected]

0
1. On page 80541, in the first column, under ``Sec.  210.2-01'' in 
Instruction 2.c, ``Revising paragraphs (c)(1)(ii)(A) introductory 
text'' is corrected to read ``Revising paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A)(1) 
introductory text.''

    Dated: February 4, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02615 Filed 2-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
3.1004 Contract clauses. ( a ) Insert the clause at FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, in solicitations and contracts if the value of the contract is expected to exceed $6 million and the performance period is 120 days or more.
( b ) ( 1 ) Unless the contract is for the acquisition of a commercial product or commercial service or will be performed entirely outside the United States, insert the clause at 52.203-14, Display of Hotline Poster(s), if— ( i ) The contract exceeds $6 million or a lesser amount established by the agency; and
( ii ) ( A ) The agency has a fraud hotline poster; or
( B ) The contract is funded with disaster assistance funds.
( 2 ) In paragraph (b)(3) of the clause, the contracting officer shall— ( i ) Identify the applicable posters; and
( ii ) Insert the website link(s) or other contact information for obtaining the agency and/or Department of Homeland Security poster.
( 3 ) In paragraph (d) of the clause, if the agency has established policies and procedures for display of the OIG fraud hotline poster at a lesser amount, the contracting officer shall replace “$6 million” with the lesser amount that the agency has established.
[72 FR 65881, Nov. 23, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 67090, Nov. 12, 2008; 80 FR 38296, July 2, 2015; 85 FR 62487, Oct. 2, 2020; 86 FR 61020, Nov. 4, 2021]
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 31, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00590-CV 

HOLLYE G. MUHAMMAD, Appellant 

V. 

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-10538 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

By notice dated April 30, 2013, the Court directed appellant to pay the $175 filing fee for 

the appeal within ten days. We warned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided 

documentation showing she is entitled to proceed without payment of the fee, or communicated 

with the Court regarding the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

130590F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

HOLLYE G. MUHAMMAD, Appellant 

No. 05-13-00590-CV V. 

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-10538. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, 

Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We 

ORDER that appellee BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. recover its costs of this appeal, if any, 

from appellant Hollye G. Muhammad. 

Judgment entered July 31, 2013 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE
# C_2019422EN.01001401.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/14

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

13 December 2019

(2019/C 422/07)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1174 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4731 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83508 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4490 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0982 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 137,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0630 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,508 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 328,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2726 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7795 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,4822 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6159 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4712 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7062 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6873 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5106 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 308,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1393 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7900 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4398 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 626,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6199 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,441 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,9930 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,729 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5664 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2518 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,0610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1174

JPY

Japanese yen

122,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4731

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83508

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4490

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0982

ISK

Iceland króna

137,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0630

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,508

HUF

Hungarian forint

328,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2726

RON

Romanian leu

4,7795

TRY

Turkish lira

6,4822

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6159

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4712

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7062

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6873

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5106

KRW

South Korean won

1 308,97

ZAR

South African rand

16,1393

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7900

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4398

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 626,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6199

PHP

Philippine peso

56,441

RUB

Russian rouble

69,9930

THB

Thai baht

33,729

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5664

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2518

INR

Indian rupee

79,0610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
36.203 Government estimate of construction costs. ( a ) An independent Government estimate of construction costs shall be prepared and furnished to the contracting officer at the earliest practicable time for each proposed contract and for each contract modification anticipated to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may require an estimate when the cost of required work is not anticipated to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The estimate shall be prepared in as much detail as though the Government were competing for award.
( b ) When two-step sealed bidding is used, the independent Government estimate shall be prepared when the contract requirements are definitized.
( c ) Access to information concerning the Government estimate shall be limited to Government personnel whose official duties require knowledge of the estimate. An exception to this rule may be made during contract negotiations to allow the contracting officer to identify a specialized task and disclose the associated cost breakdown figures in the Government estimate, but only to the extent deemed necessary to arrive at a fair and reasonable price. The overall amount of the Government's estimate shall not be disclosed except as permitted by agency regulations.
[48 FR 42356, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1744, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985; 62 FR 44829, Aug. 22, 1997; 71 FR 57368, Sept. 28, 2006]
370.701 Solicitation provision. The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 352.270-9, Non-Discrimination for Conscience, in solicitations valued at more than the micro-purchase threshold: ( a ) In connection with the implementation of HIV/AIDS programs under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief established by the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act of 2003, as amended; or
( b ) Where the contractor will receive funding under the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act of 2003, as amended. In resolving any issues or complaints that offerors may raise regarding meeting the requirements specified in the provision, the contracting officer shall consult with the Office of Global Health Affairs, Office of the General Counsel, the Program Manager, and other HHS officials, as appropriate.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)  I, Rene Lerer, as Chief
Executive Officer of Magellan Health Services, Inc (the Company), certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:  (1)the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ RENE LERERRene LererDate: July 31, 2009
  Chief Executive Officer  1
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.134


                              Employment Agreement

                              ROBERT P. PIETRANGELO
                                SEPTEMBER 7, 2001

1.    TERM:  2 years, automatically renewing for an additional 3 years if sales
      exceed expenses before the conclusion of second year

2.    EMPLOYMENT:  Chief Operating Officer

3.    DUTIES:  manage all tasks and resources of the Company

4.    COMPENSATION:  $160,000 - per year plus a car allowance with annual
      increases at the discretion of the board

5.    INCENTIVE BONUS' CASH:  for 2001, $5,000 per $100,000 of sales awarded in
      $5,000 increments annually (incremental including acquisitions) up to
      $500,000

6.    INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS:

      a.    500,000 shares of Biomune/Company "144" stock vested equally over 5
            years for year 2001 at the current value of $.20 per share

      b.    For subsequent years:  at discretion of the board;

7.    INCENTIVE BONUS STOCK OPTIONS:  entitled to 500,000 shares of immediately
      vested options of Biomune/Company registered stock at the current value of
      $.20 share if:

      a.    The Company achieves $2 million in sales in 2001, and

      b.    The Company's sales exceed expenses by the last day of 2001

8.    TERMINATION FOR CAUSE:  as defined in original LPK agreement

9.    INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION:  as defined in original LPK agreement

10.   DISABILITY OR DEATH:  Entitle to

      a.    Base compensation plus allowances and bonuses will continue for 12
            months following death or disability

      b.    All options vesting and exercisable and, remain exercisable as
            though still employed by the Company

      c.    The company will reimburse the employee for the cost of $500,000
            term life insurance and a disability insurance policy covering total
            remaining value of this agreement.

11.   SEVERANCE BENEFITS FOR INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION:  entitle to full/remaining
      value (including stock and stock options) of this agreement based on sales
      exceeding expenses any time preceding Termination.  Options exercisable as
      though still employed by the Company.

12.   SALE OF BUSINESS/CHANGE OF CONTROL:  see existing agreement



Signed__________________ - date ________  Signed _______________ - date_____
#### Eleanor Montelione et al., Respondents, v. Econ-O-Wash of New Jersey, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, defendant Econ-O-Wash of New Jersey, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 2, 1963, which after a pretrial hearing granted plaintiffs a preference in trial and directed that the action be placed on the Ready Day Calendar for a date certain. Order reversed, without costs, and preference vacated, without prejudice to a future application for a preference, if plaintiffs be so advised. In addition to the usual grounds for the granting of a preference, namely, indigence or likelihood of death, a preference pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice and rule 8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Kings County, may also be granted in the interests of justice upon a finding that at a pretrial hearing the defendant acted arbitrarily and not in good faith. However, a stenographic transcript of the minutes of the hearing or other appropriate evidence showing the facts upon which the court based such finding must be contained in the record in order to justify the grant of a preference *(Abramson*v. *Kenwood Labs.,*17 A D 2d 626). The instant record is devoid of such evidence; hence, the preference must be vacated without prejudice. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-141391) of First California Financial Group, Inc. and to the use of our report dated March 28, 2005 (except for Note 14, as to which the date is September 28, 2006), included in the AnnualReport on Form 10-KSB of National Mercantile Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in this Form 10-KSB. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

LosAngeles, California 

April 9, 2007
#### Louis Fogel v. Ease Lestz.

Motion for consolidation denied as unnecessary since court practice permits the inclusion of both appeals in a single record. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Tálente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
# 2011 grantees