alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

BENJAMIN WILLIAMS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 5691

)

STATE OF MISSOURI JUVENILE )

OFFICE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Benjamin Williams (“Williams”) has filed a self-prepared

“Complaint of Constitutional Rights Violations and Motion for

Emergency Injunction” against two agencies of the State of

Missouri and Missouri Circuit Judge Robert Liston, seeking to

invoke federal subject matter jurisdiction on diversity of

citizenship grounds. But Missouri is insulated from such an

action by the Eleventh Amendment, while Judge Liston is protected

by absolute judicial immunity as to conduct that comes within the

scope of his judicial functions.

Because Williams seeks in forma pauperis status, he must

establish not only his financial inability to pay the filing fee

but also the assertion of a nonfrivolous claim in the legal sense

(see Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000)). What

has been said in the preceding paragraph confirms that Williams

cannot meet the latter requirement. Hence his motion for in

forma pauperis treatment is denied. And because there is no way

in which Williams’ Complaint can be salvaged substantively, this

Case: 1:12-cv-05691 Document #: 6 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:14
Court sua sponte dismisses this action as well.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: July 23, 2012

2

Case: 1:12-cv-05691 Document #: 6 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:15
# C_2017282EN.01000301.xml

| 26.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 August 2017

(2017/C 282/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1808 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4391 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92083 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5053 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1390 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2278 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,084 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,68 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2598 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5983 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1080 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4919 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4769 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2372 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6363 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6055 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 327,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5488 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8596 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4140 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 758,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0456 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,327 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,8312 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,332 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7045 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8445 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,5975 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1808

JPY

Japanese yen

129,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4391

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92083

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5053

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1390

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2278

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,084

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,68

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2598

RON

Romanian leu

4,5983

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1080

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4919

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4769

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2372

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6363

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6055

KRW

South Korean won

1 327,05

ZAR

South African rand

15,5488

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8596

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4140

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 758,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0456

PHP

Philippine peso

60,327

RUB

Russian rouble

69,8312

THB

Thai baht

39,332

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7045

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8445

INR

Indian rupee

75,5975

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
## FY 2023

- New Awards:     MS Excel  (19K) 
- Project Abstracts:     MS Word  (47K)

## FY 2022

- New Awards:     MS Excel  (11K) 
- Project Abstracts:     MS Word  (45K)

## FY 2021

- New Awards:     MS Excel  (11K)  
- Project Abstracts:     MS Word  (39K)

## FY 2020

- New awards:    MS Excel  (37K)
- Project Abstracts:    MS Word  (37K)

###  For Historical Purposes Only - Previous CEVSS Awards 

## FY 2019

      - No new awards

## FY 2018

      - No new awards

## FY 2017

      - No new awards

## FY 2016

      - No new awards

## FY 2015

      - New awards:     MS Excel  (36K)
      - Project Abstracts:     MS Word  (183K)
      - Google map showing the FY 2015 grantees

## FY 2014

      - No new awards

## FY 2013

      - No new awards

## FY 2012

      - No new awards

## FY 2011

      - No new awards were made in FY 2011.

FIPSE Home
#### 30.202-5 Filing disclosure statements.

See 48 CFR 9903.202-5.

[61 FR 18917, Apr. 29, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 40237, July 25, 1997; 85 FR 67614, Oct. 23, 2020]
# C_2017009EN.01000101.xml

| 12.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8132 — FMC Technologies/Technip)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 9/01)

On 22 November 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8132. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8132. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 9, 2006

By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer









1







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 9, 2006

By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer











2
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:11
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:12
Case: 1:12-cv-04986 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/22/12 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:13
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 52 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to ‘‘Restoring Internet Freedom’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2018 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. 

SCHATZ, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. MERKLEY, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. HASSAN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. PETERS, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. REED, Mr. KAINE, Ms. WARREN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BENNET, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. CARDIN, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. 

DUCKWORTH, Ms. HARRIS, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. UDALL, Mr. BOOKER, 

Mr. CASEY, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. 

SMITH, Mr. TESTER, Mr. KING, Mr. NELSON, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. CARPER, Mr. COONS, Ms. 

HEITKAMP, Mr. MANCHIN, and Mr. JONES) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Federal Communications Commission relating to 

‘‘Restoring Internet Freedom’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the FedVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:46 Feb 28, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ52.IS SJ52

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 52 IS 

1 eral Communications Commission relating to ‘‘Restoring 

2 Internet Freedom’’ (83 Fed. Reg. 7852 (February 22, 

3 2018)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 08, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 08, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0121. ANA HENAO v. MIGUEL HENAO.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 19A05655
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 33-40397 and 33-44776 on Forms S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-125113 on Form S-1 of our report dated July 25, 2006 (January 29, 2007 as to Restatement No. 1 and March 29, 2007 as toRestatement No. 2, as to the effects of the restatements discussed in Note 2; and January 29, 2007 as to the first four paragraphs and March 29, 2007 as to the fifth through eighth paragraphs for subsequent events described inNote 21), (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatements discussed in Note 2), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of FlowInternational Corporation and our report on management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated July 25, 2006, (January 29, 2007 as to the effects of the material weakness related to the controlenvironment and March 29, 2007 as to the material weakness relating to the financial reporting process described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting ( as revised)) (which report expresses an adverse opinionon the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 of Flow International Corporation for the year ended April 30,2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Seattle,Washington 

March 29, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Flow International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), for the year ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Douglas P. Fletcher, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P.
FLETCHER                                      
|Douglas P. Fletcher Principal Financial Officer January 29, 2007
217.7004 Solicitation and award. ( a ) Solicitations shall include a request for offerors to state prices— ( 1 ) For the new items being acquired without any exchange; and
( 2 ) For the new items with the exchange (trade-in allowance) for the exchange property listed.
( b ) The contracting officer is not obligated to award on an exchange basis. If the lowest evaluated offer is an offer for the new items without any exchange, the contracting officer may award on that basis and forgo the exchange.
( c ) Exchanges may be made only with the successful offeror. When the successful offer includes an exchange, award one contract for both the acquisition of the new property and the trade-in of the exchange property. The only exception is when the items must be acquired against a mandatory Federal supply schedule contract, in which case, award a separate contract for the exchange.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Chattem,
Inc.'s unaudited financial statements and its qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                           2,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900
<INVENTORY>                                     29,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,812
<PP&E>                                          48,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 488,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,063
<BONDS>                                        355,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,005
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   488,538
<SALES>                                         62,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,371
<CGS>                                           16,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,196
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (542)
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,066
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31


</TABLE>
#### Maurice Manoil, Appellant, v. Carlo F. Salvador, Respondent.

Judgment dismissing the complaint, entered on March 26, 1963, on a directed verdict, affirmed, with $50 costs to respondent. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens and Staley, J J.; Steuer, J., dissents and would reverse and order a new trial on the ground that plaintiff was entitled to the best inference to be drawn from the testimony. In that view, sufficient was established to allow the jury to pass upon whether plaintiff was in fact defrauded.
## Timeline

**Current Competition: FY 2023****Application Available:**July 26, 2023**Application Deadline:**September 25, 2023

## Federal Register Notice

- Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for FY 2023  dated July 26, 2023 |   PDF

Current Application

Applications for the FY 2023 Postsecondary Success Program is available now on Grants.gov.

**TO APPLY:**

The FY 2023 Postsecondary Success Grant Program application is available until September 25, 2023 via the Grants.gov website at **www.grants.gov** under Opportunity Number: ED-GRANTS-072623-001 .

Click here to access the FY 2023 PSSG Program Application Booklet.

Tips and Assistance

Please follow the guidance published in the Federal Register Notice and the application instructions in Grants.gov.

The technical assistance pre-application webinar will occur:- Tuesday, August 15 at 2:00pm (EST) , and
- Thursday, August 31 at 2:00pm (EST) . 

To receive the technical assistance pre-application webinar links, please complete the Pre-Registration Form.

Click here to view webinar slides.

Click here to access the recording of the FY 2023 PSSG Program’s 1st Technical Assistance Webinar held August 15, 2023.
Application Contact**Nemeka Mason-Clercin**U.S. Department of Education 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, 5th floor, Washington, DC 20202-4260  Telephone:  (202) 987-1340 Email: Nemeka.Mason@ed.govEmail: PSSP@ed.gov**Nalini Lamba-Nieves**U.S. Department of Education400 Maryland Avenue, SW, room 5C127, Washington, DC 20202-4260  Telephone:  (202) 453-7953 Email: Nalini.Lamba-Nieves@ed.govEmail:PSSP@ed.gov
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.

FIPSE Home
  Last Modified: 08/30/2023
NO. 07-05-0404-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 17, 2006

______________________________

BRETT THOMAS BAIRD, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT #3 OF DENTON COUNTY;

NO. 2004-09096-C; HONORABLE DAVID D. GARCIA, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Brett Thomas Baird has given notice of appeal from a Judgment of

Community Supervision for the offense of Duty on Striking Fixtureor Highway Landscaping.

The appellate court clerk received and filed the trial court clerk’s record on September 23,

2005. The trial court reporter’s record was filed on November 15, 2005. 

By letter dated December 28, 2005, the appellate clerk reminded counsel for

appellant that appellant’s brief was due on December 15, 2005, and that neither the brief
2

nor a motion for a further extension of time had been received. Counsel for appellant was

further advised by such letter that if no response to the letter was received by January 6,

2006, the appeal would be abated to the trial court for hearing pursuant to Rule of Appellate

Procedure 38.8(b). No response has been received. 

Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court. TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately

cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: 

(1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; 

(2) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, then whether appellant

is indigent, and if not indigent, whether counsel for appellant has

abandoned the appeal; 

(3) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant’s

present counsel should be replaced; and

(4) what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of

appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s appeal

if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or, if appellant

desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be

diligently pursued.

If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be replaced, the

court should cause the clerk of this court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar

of Texas identification number of the newly-appointed or newly-retained attorney. 

In support of its determination, the trial court shall prepare and file written findings

of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s

record. The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental 
3

reporter’s record. Those supplemental records shall be submitted to the clerk of this court

no later than February 17, 2006.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table 8.Survival of juvenile chinook salmon(Oncohynchus tschawytcha) over a 40 day period in 1990 and an 84 day period in 1991.

b Comparison is made to fish from the Kalama Hatchery. 

Table of Contents