alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 123 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 123

          Designating May 20, 2017, as ``Kids to Parks Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2017

 Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Portman, Mr. 
 Booker, and Ms. Hirono) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          Designating May 20, 2017, as ``Kids to Parks Day''.

Whereas the 7th annual Kids to Parks Day will be celebrated on May 20, 2017;
Whereas the goal of Kids to Parks Day is to promote healthy outdoor recreation 
        and environmental stewardship, empower young people, and encourage 
        families to get outdoors and visit the parks and public land of the 
        United States;
Whereas on Kids to Parks Day, individuals from rural and urban areas of the 
        United States can be reintroduced to the splendid national, State, and 
        neighborhood parks located in their communities;
Whereas communities across the United States offer a variety of natural 
        resources and public land, often with free access, to individuals 
        seeking outdoor recreation;
Whereas the people of the United States, young and old, should be encouraged to 
        lead more healthy and active lifestyles;
Whereas Kids to Parks Day is an opportunity for families to take a break from 
        their busy lives and come together for a day of active, wholesome fun; 
        and
Whereas Kids to Parks Day will broaden an appreciation for nature and the 
        outdoors in young people, foster a safe setting for independent play and 
        healthy adventure in neighborhood parks, and facilitate self-reliance 
        while strengthening communities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 20, 2017, as ``Kids to Parks Day'';
            (2) recognizes the importance of outdoor recreation and the 
        preservation of open spaces to the health and education of the 
        young people of the United States; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

 

IN RE: GROUPON DERIVATIVE 

LITIGATION 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Master Docket No. 1:12-cv-5300 

Hon. Andrea R. Wood 

Hon. Mary M. Rowland 

NOTICE OF MOTION 

TO: ALL PARTIES OF RECORD 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 9:00am or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, 

shall appear before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood or any Judge sitting in her stead, in the 

Courtroom usually occupied by her in Courtroom 1925 of the Dirksen Federal Building, 219 S. 

Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and shall then and there present Plaintiff’s Agreed Motion for 

Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. 

Dated: April 6, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Theodore B. Bell 

 Theodore B. Bell 

 WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER 

 FREEMAN & HERZ LLC 

70 W. Madison St., Suite 1400 

Chicago, IL 60602 

Tel: (312) 984-0000 

Fax: (312) 214-3110 

tbell@whafh.com

Case: 1:12-cv-05300 Document #: 62 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:257
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 2 

Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 

assembled. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of 

the Senate is assembled. 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of 

2 Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is assembled 

3 and that the Senate is ready to proceed to business. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Harry Berlin et al., Appellants, v. Joseph Goldberg, Respondent.

Order, entered April 23, 1964, denying leave to plaintiff Shirley Berlin, as executrix of the estate of Abraham Ash, deceased, to renew the motion to transfer the action to the Supreme Court, and for other relief, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to the respondent. This disposition does not preclude an application in the Civil Court for a substitution of parties in the personal injury action, Concur — Botein, P. J,, Breitel, Rabin, Yalente and McNally, JJ,
# ReedSmith
Courtney 

### R. Bateman Direct Phone: +1 202 414 9265 Email: CBateman@reedsmith.com 

## February 12,2015
NiaDaniels, ARM-108 Federal AviationAdministration Office ofRulemaking, Airmen 

## & Airspace Rules Division 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 810 Washington, DC 20591 Reed Smith LLP 1301 K Street, N.W. Suite 1000- East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005-3373 Tel +1 202 414 9200 Fax +1 202 414 9299 reedsmith.com



## Re: Advanced Aerial Inspection Resources Section 333 Exemption Request DocketNo. FAA-2014-0873 Dear Ms. Daniels: This will confirmthatthe informationrequested in yourJanuary 26, 2015, correspondence to Wesley Oliphantwas hand-deliveredto your offices on February gth. 

## Please contact me with any questions. Thank you for your attentionto this matter. Sincerely, /signed/ 

## Courtney R. 

## Bateman CRB:lsj

NEW YORK + LONDON + HONG KONG + CHICAGO + WASHINGTON, D.C. + BEIJING + PARIS • LOS ANGELES + SAN FRANCISCO + PHILADELPHIA • SHANGHAI + PITTSBURGH + HOUSTON SINGAPORE+ MUNICH+ ABU DHABI+ PRINCETON • NORTHERN VIRGINIA+ WILMINGTON+ SILICON VALLEY+ DUBAI +CENTURY CITY+ RICHMOND+ ATHENS +KAZAKHSTAN US_ACTIVE-120992938.1-CRBATEMA02/12/2015 1:23 PM
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") of Colorado Wyoming Reserve Company (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2003, Kim Fuerst, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 29, 2005

/s/ Kim Fuerst



Kim Fuerst



Chief Executive Officer
');
	document.write('

## Performance Reports

At the end of the project period, grantees must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c).

FIPSE Home
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 20-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF JOHN C.BOYD FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED AUG 1 2 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court O o t if ERMnntana

John C. Boyd has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State of Montana pursuantto Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission,Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Boyd has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator,John C.Boyd may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State ofMontana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this I a-- day ofAugust, 2020.
ChiefJustice 08/12/2020

Case Number: PR 20-00051 /.4r.44' 5 % 

# 414., Justices
Appeal No. 73-199.

#### In re Estate of Howard Everett Taylor.

*Moses Kando, James Cardono,*for appellants. *Anthony T. Jackvony,*for appellees.

Probate appeal to the Superior Court contesting the, appointment of a Guardian for Howard Everett Taylor. The Superior Court sustained the appeal from the probate court and dismissed the Guardian. An appeal was duly taken from the judgment of the Superior Court. After briefs were filed and the case set down for oral argument, the attorney for appellants informed the court that Howard Everett Taylor was deceased.

Based on the present state of the record, appellants are ordered to file a memorandum within ten days of this order showing cause why the instant appeal should not be dismissed as being moot. Appellee will have ten days thereafter in which to file an answer.
19.807 Estimating the fair market price. ( a ) The contracting officer shall estimate the fair market price of the work to be performed by the 8(a) contractor.
( b ) In estimating the fair market price for an acquisition other than those covered in paragraph (c) of this section, the contracting officer shall use cost or price analysis and consider commercial prices for similar products and services, available in-house cost estimates, data (including certified cost or pricing data) submitted by the SBA or the 8(a) contractor, and data obtained from any other Government agency.
( c ) In estimating a fair market price for a repeat purchase, the contracting officer shall consider recent award prices for the same items or work if there is comparability in quantities, conditions, terms, and performance times. The estimated price should be adjusted to reflect differences in specifications, plans, transportation costs, packaging and packing costs, and other circumstances. Price indices may be used as guides to determine the changes in labor and material costs. Comparison of commercial prices for similar items may also be used.
[54 FR 46005, Oct. 31, 1989, as amended at 75 FR 53149, Aug. 30, 2010]
Exhibit 10.5




October 25, 2009
  
  Entertainment Property collaboration agreement
 
  This agreement by and between NT Media Corp.(herein after "NT") and Sinahome Entertainment, in cooperation with Marblestep Productions (herein after "Sinahome") shall dictate the terms of the collaboration between NT and Sinahome.
  1. NT and hereby agree to collaborate on the production of a webisodic series, "Straight Up With A Twist" (hereinafter SUWAT).
  2. NT hereby agrees to finance the production up to $5,000.00. This amount may be adjusted upward by mutual agreement.
  3. Cost recoupment: From any revenue generated through advertising, sponsorship, or otherwise, NT shall be entitled to "first dollar" until it has recouped all monies spent on production and marketing and publicity.
  4. Profit Sharing: Once all costs have been recouped by NT, all profits shall be shared equally between NT and Sinahome.
  5. Intellectual Property: Any trademarks or other rights arising from the production shall be co-owned by NT and Sinahome unless otherwise agreed upon.
  
  NT Media
 Ali Moussavi
  Sinahome Entertainment
 Homie Doroodian
MOLLY F IS 

JUSTICE 

• 

Order entered November 13, 2012 

In The 

Court of Ri3peaf5 

jfiftb Oifitrict of Texas; at affa55 

No. 05-12-00465-CV 

PEGASUS TRANSPORATION GROUP INC., Appellant 

V. 

CSX TRANSPORTATION INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-02008 

ORDER 

The Court has before it non-resident attorney Eric C. Palombo's November 8, 2012 

motion for admission pro hac vice and resident practicing attorney Henry S. Wehrmann's 

November 8, 2012 motion in support of Mr. Palombo's motion. The Court GRANTS the 

motions and ADMITS Mr. Palombo to practice pro hac vice in this case.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0357

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SHELDON VERNON HAMELINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until October 6, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 30 2023

08/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0357
Month

Sum of USA Class 8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep YTD Sep 2015 Total DTNA Retail Sales DTNA 8,080 7,335 7,183 7,065 8,645 9,922 9,469 8,678 8,400 74,777DTNA reported to Wards DTNA Sales with Detroit Engines DTNA 6,417 5,785 5,050 5,321 6,527 6,835 6,686 5,917 6,151 54,689not publicly available Total Industry Sales US Class 8 17,373 17,811 20,625 20,50921,501 25,36923,383 21,99820,972 189,541Source Wards SoM DTNA (US Class 8) 46.5% 41.2% 34.8% 34.4% 40.2% 39.1% 40.5% 39.4% 40.1% 39.5% SoM Detroit (US Class 8) 36.9% 32.5% 24.5% 25.9% 30.4% 26.9% 28.6% 26.9% 29.3% 28.9%
DENIED and Opinion Filed September 17, 2024

In the

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-24-01061-CV

IN RE RIGO REYNA, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1775149

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Breedlove

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

Before the Court is relator’s September 9, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus

asking this Court to compel the trial court to rule on his pending motions. Relator’s 

petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in numerous 

respects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1, 52.3(j), (k), 52.7(a). Relators seeking 

extraordinary relief through a writ of mandamus must comply with the requirements 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure or face denial. See In re Guillaume, No. 

05-24-00765-CV, 2024 WL 3548511, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 26, 2024, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying mandamus relief based on relator’s failure to 

comply with several Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure).
–2–

Because relator’s petition fails to do so in many respects, we deny the petition.

241061f.p05 /Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of the Claim of David Keefer, Respondent, v Norton Company et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 24, 1978, as corrected by decision filed June 23, 1978, which found that claimant contracted an occupational disease in the nature of a herniated disc as a result of repetitive lifting of belts weighing between 20 and 90 pounds in the course of his employment. The board held: "claimant injured lower back as a result of * * * occupational disease within the meaning of the law. The ultimate test is not the initiation of the precipitation of the disease itself, but, whether the employment acts upon the disease or condition in such a manner as to cause a disability which did not previously exist, (Perez v. Pearl-Wich Co.).” (See, also, *Matter of Cornwell v Rockwell Int.,*59 AD2d 475, affd 46 NY2d 762.) The decision of the board is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroTelesis,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for
the  period  ended  June 30,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the  undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


By /s/ Joseph Gutierrez
--------------------------------
Joseph Gutierrez, President, CFO

Dated: November 22, 2004
#### TRIPLE TEE GOLF, INC., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation; Tom Stites & Associates, Inc., Doing Business as Impact Golf Technologies, Inc.; John Thomas Stites, III, Also Known as Tom Stites, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-10930.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 11, 2008.

Michael I. Santucci, Melvin K. Silver-man, Jonathan Tad Suder, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Christopher J. Renk, Banner & Witcoff, Chicago, IL, Robert Daniel Martinez, Cot-ten Schmidt, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this suit for misappropriation of trade secrets and for damages under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the district court, on remand, granted summary judgment by determining that plaintiff Triple Tee Golf, Inc., never received a right to sue on the claim at issue and was not a “consumer” under the state statute. We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We find no reversible error. The judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
SERVED SEPTEMBER 15, 2004 

r - T - •- , . - ., ^ r,-. _ 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS, WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WILEY CARAWAY 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP99SO0019 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FAA-1999-5778 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

These proceedings arise from a Complaint served May 13, 1999. Respondent filed a 

Request for Hearing. 

14C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent of 

the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws 

the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the 

proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

On September 15, 2004, Complainant, by and through counsel, orally moved during a 

Post-Hearing Conference to withdraw its complaint on the basis the matter has been settled. 

WHEREFORE, THE WITHIN FILED ORAL MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

COMPLAINT HAVING BEEN RECEIVED AND CONSIDERED, IT IS ORDERED AS 

FOLLOWS: 

1. Complainant's request to withdraw complaint be and is hereby granted; 

2. These proceedings be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice; and 

3. Agency counsel shall send to the judge and to the Hearing Docket a copy 

of any order that the settlement produced. 
rtard CCjSoodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge^ 

Attachments - Service List 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP99S00019 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Room 2014, AGC-400 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: (202)385-8229 

FAX: (202)493-5142 

ONE COPY 

Wiley Caraway 

6372 Berwin Drive 

Douglasville, GA 30135-2202 

Raymond Veatch, Esquire 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: (404) 305-5200 

FAX: (404)305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20; Room 5411 

US Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, SW 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2143; Legal Assistant 6-5121 

FAX: (202)366-7536
#### The Market National Bank of New York, Appellant, *v.*The Pacific National Bank of Boston, Respondent.

(Argued June 29,1883 ;

decided October 2, 1883.)

*Abram Wakeman*for appellant.

*Willard Bartlett*for respondent.

,Agree to affirm on opinion in *Raynor et al.*v. *Paoifio Nat. B’k (ante,*p. 371).

All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.

Order affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

HSBC BANK USA, N.A., etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 4126

)

JESSICA SCLAFINI, etc., )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Counsel for Jessica Sclafini (“Sclafini”), the mortgagor in

this mortgage foreclosure action, has noticed up for presentment

on November 15 her motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (“AC”)

because of its asserted failure to establish diversity of

citizenship. To that end Sclafini’s counsel seeks to rely on the

AC’s failure to use the words “current mortgagee” (emphasis in

the motion itself) in speaking of the junior mortgage.

That nit-picking approach ignores the basic principle that

for purposes of addressing a motion such as the current one the

plaintiff is entitled to the drawing of reasonable inferences in

its favor. This Court denies the motion sua sponte and orders

Sclafini to answer the AC on or before November 19, 2012.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: November 6, 2012

Case: 1:12-cv-04126 Document #: 20 Filed: 11/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:96
25.200 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart implements— ( 1 ) 41 U.S.C. chapter 83, Buy American;
( 2 ) Executive Order 10582, December 17, 1954;
( 3 ) Executive Order 13881, July 15, 2019;
( 4 ) Executive Order 14005, January 25, 2021; and
( 5 ) Waiver of the domestic content test of the Buy American statute for acquisitions of commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1907, but see 25.201(b)(2)(ii).
( b ) It applies to contracts for the construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public work in the United States.
( c ) When using funds appropriated or otherwise provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5) (Recovery Act) for construction, see subpart 25.6.
[74 FR 2722, Jan. 15, 2009, as amended at 74 FR 22810, May 14, 2009; 79 FR 24209, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 6187, Jan. 19, 2021; 87 FR 12792, Mar. 7, 2022]
#### Irwin Vosburgh et al., Respondents, v. Robert Hanks, Appellant. Irwin Vosburgh, Respondent, v. McLean Trucking Company, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The decision dated July 2, 1964 is amended to provide as follows: Judgment in favor of Peter Buchaldan in the action of Irwin Vosbürgh and Peter Buchakian affirmed, with costs. The amount of the verdict in favor of Irwin Vosbürgh as plaintiff is excessive and not supported by the medical or other proof and the judgments as to Irwin Vosbürgh are reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 -days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce the verdict to $12,500, in which event judgments, as reduced, affirmed, with costs to the respondent Irwin Vosbürgh. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.