U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Annual Noncompliance Report (ANCR)

A State‐by‐State  

Summary of Violations and Enforcement Response

At Smaller Clean Water Act Dischargers under the  

National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program

Calendar Year 2008  

(April 29, 2010)

An Interactive Version of this Report is available online at the following URL

http://www.epa‐echo.gov/echo/ancr/us/
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Contents

Introductory Message from Assistant Administrator Cynthia Giles............................................... 3

What Is This Report About?............................................................................................................ 4

NPDES Program Background........................................................................................................... 4

Process for the ANCR Report for Calendar Year 2008.................................................................... 5

Key Data Caveats............................................................................................................................. 5

Reporting Requirements................................................................................................................. 6

Key National Findings...................................................................................................................... 7

Detailed Results and Analyses........................................................................................................ 8

1. Percentage of Facilities Reviewed for Violations................................................................ 8

2. Percentage of Facilities Reviewed with Violations........................................................... 10

3. Percentage of Facilities Reviewed with Serious Violations (i.e., Category I, roughly

comparable to significant noncompliance) ...................................................................... 10

4. Noncompliance Rates for Nonmajor vs. Major Facilities ................................................. 11

5. Percentage of Violating Facilities with Formal Enforcement ........................................... 11

6. Schedule‐Noncompliant Nonmajor Facilities................................................................... 12

Attachments

1.   Calendar Year 2008 ANCR Data for Each State, Grouped by Magnitude of Changes Made to

the Data Compared to Data in NPDES National Data Systems

2.   Description of Data Metrics

3.   List of Facilities with Extended Compliance Schedules

2
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Introductory Message from Assistant Administrator Cynthia Giles

This report provides valuable information about the state of compliance by smaller

permitted facilities across the country with the Clean Water Act (CWA). The information within

this report shows that regulated facilities must do a better job complying with the effluent

limits established by the states or EPA in their discharge permits.  These limits are designed to

preserve and protect our rivers, streams, and lakes—which support aquatic life, provide

drinking water, and allow recreational uses such as fishing and swimming. Although one

permittee with a violation may not result in serious water quality degradation, the combined

effect of many facilities discharging above permitted limits could be substantial—particularly

when combined with other violations that are not the subject of this report (for example,

discharges from larger facilities, wet weather runoff from construction sites, sewer overflows,

urban runoff, and nutrient loadings from agricultural operations).  

The Clean Water Act Action Plan, which the United States Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) is now developing to address water pollution problems, includes a commitment from EPA

to work closely with states to improve compliance with the CWA. This will require a

coordinated effort from EPA and the states to address the problems outlined in this report –

namely, that noncompliance rates are too high and enforcement is too infrequent.  EPA will

ensure that violations are dealt with in a consistent way across the states.  Most states have

been authorized to implement the Clean Water Act NPDES Program; they will be at the

forefront of efforts to ensure compliance with the permits that they have issued. EPA will

implement the program where states are not authorized and ensure that problems are dealt

with evenly across states.  As shown in the report below, there are many violations that

continue without enforcement.  It is my goal to ensure that there is real enforcement presence

across the states to deter violations from occurring and improve compliance with the law.

As EPA and the states develop new approaches to solving these problems through

enforcement and compliance initiatives, the release of this report represents an important step

forward in improving transparency of public information. As specified under the Clean Water

Act Action Plan, EPA will strive to improve the usefulness of the information it has. With the

release of this report, for the first time EPA has developed an interactive Web site that allows

users to explore the information using an intuitive mapping interface. Although EPA does not

require all the facility‐level violation data behind the state summaries, many states are

providing this more detailed information. Users of the interactive site can dive into these

details and see which facilities have violated effluent limits, and which have had enforcement

actions taken against them. Using the popular ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History

Online) Web site, this interactive display will be a prototype for future data releases covering

other components of the CWA program, and other media, such as those covered by the Clean

Air Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. States not supplying details to EPA

regarding these smaller permittees under the CWA are required to identify and track violations,

so more information can be obtained directly from these states.

3
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

What Is This Report About?

This Annual Noncompliance Report (ANCR), as required by federal regulation (40 CFR

123.45(c)), consists of information that states are required to provide annually to EPA regarding

the noncompliance status of nonmajor National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

(NPDES) permittees (i.e., the smaller facilities and sites not considered to be major dischargers

of wastewater or stormwater). These ANCR data are not facility‐specific but do provide counts

for each state of the number of nonmajor facilities in specific categories related to compliance.

The ANCR information for calendar year 2008 was compiled by EPA from the NPDES

information provided by the states. This report is accompanied by several tables of information

(see Attachments 1–3). In addition, information related to this report is available through an

interactive website (at http://www.epa‐echo.gov/echo/ancr/us) that allows the user to review

the ANCR data provided by each state.

NPDES Program Background

EPA and the states regulate hundreds of thousands of facilities and wastewater discharges

under the NPDES program and the Clean Water Act. Forty‐six states have received

authorization to implement the NPDES program, although EPA maintains oversight of those

states and retains the ability to enforce the NPDES program. EPA directly manages the NPDES

permitting and enforcement program in the other four states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire,

New Mexico, and Idaho), in the U.S. Territories and on tribal lands. For purposes of this report,

the term “state” refers to the authorized authority overseeing the NPDES permittees within a

state, regardless whether EPA or the state is the authorized authority. When EPA is not the

authorized authority, statistics in the report generally count only activities performed by the

state agency (so additional enforcement taken by EPA is generally not shown). EPA plans to add

this additional EPA enforcement information to next year’s report.  

Facilities with point source discharges to surface waters are required to apply for individual

NPDES permits or for coverage under a broader NPDES general permit covering multiple

facilities.  These include, for example, discharges of pollutants from specific outfalls or pipes

from factories, mines, other industrial facilities or municipal wastewater treatment plants, or

from construction sites, sewer overflow points, and concentrated animal feeding operations to

receiving waters.

In accordance with the NPDES permit requirements, each permittee self‐monitors its

pollutant discharges for specific pollutant parameters at a specified location and on a specified

monitoring frequency. The permittees are then required to submit these self‐monitoring data

to the state or EPA. Although states are not required to provide EPA with database information

about facility‐specific discharges from NPDES nonmajor permittees, many states enter or

electronically send the information voluntarily. EPA’s national databases will then automatically

calculate effluent violations of the permit. Other states do not provide this level of information

to EPA for nonmajor facilities, but instead provide EPA with a summary view of what is

happening. States and EPA review this self‐monitoring data for compliance, conduct inspections

4
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

of the facilities, review required facility reports related to specific aspects of the NPDES

program, identify instances of noncompliance and take enforcement action to address the

noncompliance.

Process for the ANCR Report for Calendar Year 2008

The process used to obtain and compile the NPDES information from the states for the

ANCR report for calendar year 2008 was as follows:

• EPA Headquarters issued a “call memorandum” to the EPA Regions requesting their

assistance in obtaining the ANCR data from the states.1

• This memorandum established a deadline by which the NPDES information should be

obtained from the states.2

• EPA included with that memorandum a table that summarized the relevant NPDES

information currently available for each state according to EPA’s NPDES national data

systems: the Permit Compliance System (PCS) and Integrated Compliance Information

System for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (ICIS‐NPDES).

• In late February 2010, states had an opportunity for a final review of the data that they

had provided, providing one more confirmation step.

• EPA received the final corrections from states on March 9, 2010, and began to compile

this report.

Key Data Caveats

It is important to note the following key caveats regarding the data:

• Under the ANCR regulations, EPA collects only statistics on a state summary level, and

does not require states to provide information regarding which specific permittees had

noncompliance events or were subject to enforcement actions (this more detailed

information is required for NPDES major permittees).

o There is no existing requirement for states to provide EPA with facility‐specific

permit limits, self‐monitoring, violation, or enforcement action data for NPDES

nonmajor facilities.   

o Therefore, this information for NPDES nonmajor permittees is incomplete in

EPA’s existing NPDES national data systems for many states.

                                                      

1 For the calendar year 2008 ANCR, EPA’s Director of the Enforcement Targeting and Data Division of the Office of

Compliance issued a “call memo” to all EPA Regions on November 30, 2009.  EPA is committing to expedite the

collection of this information for 2009 and beyond so that information can be released in a more timely manner. 2 This memorandum sought the cooperation of the EPA Regions in obtaining the calendar year 2008 ANCR

information from all states by January 8, 2010.

5
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

o However, many states have consistently provided EPA with much more detailed

facility‐specific information regarding the noncompliance status of these

facilities for several years. Users of the interactive ANCR Web site will see

caveats describing how complete each state’s violation and enforcement data

are.

• The existing federal regulation (40 CFR 123.45(c)) specifies that states provide EPA with

a count of the number of enforcement actions taken by states to address

noncompliance by these NPDES nonmajor permittees.

o For ANCR purposes, EPA has chosen to request that states provide a count of the

number of formal enforcement actions taken by states (i.e., enforcement actions

that usually include a schedule that the facility needs to meet to return to

compliance).

o However, this year, several states have expressed interest in also reporting a

count of other enforcement actions that did not include a compliance schedule.  

The states indicated that such a count would better illustrate the full scope of

the states’ response to noncompliance.   

  

o As a result, EPA will consider the inclusion of a request for counts of such other

enforcement actions, in addition to formal enforcement actions, in future ANCR

reporting.  

Reporting Requirements

Under the ANCR reporting requirements and guidance, the NPDES program authority (EPA

or the state) is required to provide the following basic information as counts, rather than as

facility‐specific information:

• Number of nonmajor NPDES permittees (standard individual permits only)

• Number of nonmajor NPDES permittees reviewed by the state/Region

• Number of nonmajor NPDES permittees in Category I noncompliance (i.e., more serious

violations)

• Number of nonmajor NPDES permittees in Category II noncompliance (excluding those

in the previous category)

• Number of formal enforcement actions taken by the state/Region against nonmajor

NPDES permittees

• Number of permit modifications extending compliance deadlines granted to nonmajor

permittees.

In addition, the ANCR also requires a facility‐specific alphabetic list (and permit number) of

nonmajor NPDES permittees that are one or more years behind in construction phases of the

6
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

compliance schedule. Please see Attachment 2 for a more detailed description of each of these

data fields.

Key National Findings

The key national findings of the 2008 Annual Noncompliance Report for NPDES Nonmajor

Permittees include the following:

• Universe: States indicated that they regulate 40,032 individually‐permitted NPDES

nonmajor facilities (for comparison, there are about 6,700 major facilities).

• Reviewed for Noncompliance: States indicated that they reviewed the noncompliance

status for 75% of these individually‐permitted NPDES nonmajor facilities (EPA considers

a facility “reviewed” if the discharge amounts were compared to the limits to form a

determination of compliance or violation, or if an inspection or other compliance

determination effort occurred).

• Noncompliance Rates: States reported that 45% of the nonmajor permittees reviewed

for noncompliance had some type of violation in calendar year 2008.  However, actual

noncompliance rates may be higher.  EPA’s analysis of the data indicates that in states

with relatively good tracking of data in the national databases, the noncompliance rate

is 73%. On the other hand, states manually‐reporting noncompliance rates without

underlying facility‐specific discharge data, reported an overall national noncompliance

rate of approximately 39%. The actual noncompliance rates may be higher than

reported in some manually‐reporting states – particularly if the state reviews a sample

(rather than all) discharge reports that are submitted.   In this report, the

noncompliance rate in the states where EPA has back‐up facility‐specific violation

information confirming the state rates is called the “verified” rate.

• Serious Noncompliance Rates: Excluding 9 states that did not provide EPA with data

distinguishing between more serious (Category I) noncompliance from other (Category

II) noncompliance, 26% of the nonmajor permittees reviewed for noncompliance

exhibited Category I noncompliance (more serious violations) in calendar year 2008.  

Similar to the finding for noncompliance rates, EPA has found that the reported

noncompliance rate for serious violations is much higher for states providing detailed

compliance data in EPA’s national database than it is for those states that provide only

summary data for the ANCR; this suggests that the actual noncompliance rate for

serious violations may be much higher than reported in some states. States with

complete reporting in the national data system report a 60% Category I noncompliance

rate. On the other hand, states that did not routinely provide the facility‐specific data to

EPA’s national databases reported a national Category I noncompliance rate of just less

than 18%. Again, in this report, the noncompliance rate in the states where EPA has

back‐up facility‐specific violation information confirming the state rates is called the

7
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

“verified” rate; EPA believes this “verified” rate of 60% may be more representative of

the national Category I rate.

• Enforcement:  

o States indicated that 1,014 facilities received formal enforcement actions against

noncompliant nonmajor permittees in calendar year 2008.

o The ratio of facilities with violations to facilities with formal enforcement was

7.6%.

o The ratio of facilities with serious violations to facilities with formal enforcement

was 16%.

• Compliance Schedules: States indicated that, for calendar year 2008, 437 nonmajor

permittees were one year or more late in meeting construction schedule deadlines.

These are listed in Attachment 3.

For complete state statistics, see Attachment 1 or visit the interactive website.  

Detailed Results and Analyses

1. Percentage of Facilities Reviewed for Violations

For calendar year 2008, states have indicated that they have reviewed the compliance

status for 75% of nonmajor NPDES permittees covered in this report. This figure is down from

the previous year, in which states indicated that they had reviewed the compliance status of

approximately 80% of the nonmajor NPDES permittees.

In this context, “reviewed nonmajors” means that the states made a reasonable effort to

evaluate the compliance status of those nonmajor facilities. Such review usually entails a

comparison of existing effluent limits to reported self‐monitoring data. For this ANCR‐reporting

effort, for example, this review may have been performed by automatic compliance evaluations

conducted within EPA’s NPDES national data systems, or it may have included compliance

reviews in conjunction with inspections or prior to permit re‐issuance, or the states may have

used other manual means to conduct such reviews.  

For calendar year 2008, 18 states reported than they had reviewed the compliance status

for 100% of their individually‐permitted nonmajor NPDES permittees. These states were

Arizona, California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,

New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and

Wyoming. (Figure 1 indicates the number of states grouped by percentage of individually‐

permitted nonmajor permittees reviewed for noncompliance).

8
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Figure 1. Percent of Nonmajor Facilities 

Reported as Reviewed by States for Violations 

8

11

13

18

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Zero to less than Fifty Fifty to Eighty-nine Ninety to Ninety-nine One hundred

Percent Reviewed

Number of States

Eight states reported to EPA in the ANCR information for calendar year 2008 that they

reviewed the compliance status for less than 50% of their individually‐permitted nonmajor

NPDES permittees (see Figure 2).  This is significant because without review of submitted

discharge data or other compliance determinations, the state may not have an electronically‐

generated list of permits that were violated (meaning that hard copy review of paper reports

may be needed to find which facilities violated).

Figure 2. States That Reported Reviewing 

Less than 50% of Their Nonmajors for Noncompliance

47.4%

39.1%

32.0%

25.0%

22.0%

14.0%

3.6%

1.6%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

North Dakota 

R8

Pennsylvania 

R3

 Alaska 

R10

West Virginia 

R3

 Oregon 

R10

 Kentucky 

R4

Tennessee 

R4

 Georgia 

R4

9
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

2. Percentage of Facilities Reviewed with Violations

As a national average using data for all states, states indicated that approximately 45% of

the nonmajor NPDES permittees were in violation. This percentage is, on the surface, an

improvement from the previous calendar year, when 50% of the nonmajor NPDES permittees

were determined by the states to be in violation.

However, EPA has found through several years of analysis of the ANCRs that the reported

noncompliance rates are approximately three times higher in states which have provided

detailed facility‐level noncompliance data to EPA’s national NPDES data systems when

compared to other states. Therefore, EPA tends to rely heavily upon the states with detailed

facility‐level noncompliance data reported to EPA in identifying what it believes is a more

realistic noncompliance rate. Based on only the states which, for ANCR purposes, made no

changes or only minor changes to the data they had provided in the NPDES national data

systems, the projected national noncompliance rate, or “verified” rate, is likely to be much

closer to the rate of 73% (as found for this group of states) than to 45%.

EPA has not identified a definitive reason why noncompliance rates are lower in states that

do not send detailed facility information to the national database. One possible explanation is

that states not sending data into the national system may perform manual reviews of hard copy

discharge reports. If manual reviews are done, the states may only look at a limited number of

reports (for example, they may review only 2 of each 12 monthly reports). If this is true, the

state would not have identified violations on the unreviewed reports.

3. Percentage of Facilities Reviewed with Serious Violations (i.e., Category I, roughly

comparable to significant noncompliance)

The federal regulations issued under the Clean Water Act define more serious violations as

“Category I.” Generally, these violations are flagged when a “toxic” pollutant is measured to be

more than 20% over the permitted limit, or if a “conventional” pollutant is more than 40% over

limit. Extended failure to meet compliance schedule milestones, failure to meet enforcement

order conditions, and failure to submit monitoring data or compliance reports are also included

as serious violations. EPA’s national databases automatically calculate Category I violations

related to permit limits. States are not required to enter or send these data to EPA’s database

(for smaller facilities), although some states do so. For states that do not enter or send these

data for nonmajor permittees to EPA, the state database should allow calculation of “Category

I” violations. For major permittees, the serious violations are described as significant

noncompliance (SNC), and the Category I noncompliance designation is roughly comparable to

SNC for majors.

However, for the 2008 ANCR, some states were not able to provide this information

distinguishing between Category I and Category II violations (so there are no data available

through the ANCR regarding the number of permittees with serious violations in those states).

The federal regulations requiring state submission of this information for the ANCR states that

10
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

“the statistical information shall be organized to follow the types of noncompliance...”

described as Category I noncompliance and Category II noncompliance. Nine states (Alabama,

Arizona, California, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maryland, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) did not

make that distinction when providing noncompliance information to EPA for purposes of this

ANCR. This gap in reporting indicates that these states may not have an automated way to

distinguish the more egregious violations from other violations. This distinction is used in other

states to help identify which facilities are most in need of formal enforcement response.

Excluding the nine states that did not report Category I noncompliance, 26% of nonmajor

facilities were identified as being in Category I noncompliance (i.e., having serious violations).

However, of the states with “verified” data (i.e., states with facility‐specific violation

information in EPA’s national databases), 60% of the nonmajor facilities had Category I

violations; the projected national noncompliance rate for serious violations may be much closer

to this figure .

4. Noncompliance Rates for Nonmajor vs. Major Facilities

Although the ANCR provides information regarding nonmajor facilities, a comparison to the

noncompliance rate for major facilities may be informative.  For fiscal year 2008, 21.5% of the

major NPDES permittees nationally were identified as being in significant noncompliance (SNC)

(i.e., having serious violations).  Therefore, the individually‐permitted nonmajor NPDES

permittees are about three times more likely to have serious violations than major NPDES

permittees (i.e., 60% [as identified above] vs. 21.5%).

5. Percentage of Violating Facilities with Formal Enforcement

Of the individually‐permitted nonmajor facilities in either Category I or Category II

noncompliance, 7.6% received a formal enforcement action (an improvement from the 6.4%

reported by states in the ANCR for calendar year 2007). In calendar year 2008, six states (Texas,

Oklahoma, West Virginia, California, Wisconsin and Indiana) took 40 or more formal

enforcement actions against these individually‐permitted NPDES nonmajor facilities.  States

with large numbers of permittees would likely be have a higher number of enforcement.  

Together, these six states are responsible for 57% of the national total of formal enforcement

actions taken against these nonmajor permittees in calendar year 2008. As noted in the

detailed state‐by‐state tables in this report, many states have facilities with frequent violations,

but rarely take formal enforcement action. This is a key issue that EPA is discussing with the

states under the Clean Water Act Action Plan dialogue.

11
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Figure 3. States with 40 or More Formal Enforcement Actions

 against Nonmajors in Calendar Year 2008

190

139

94

68

47

40

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

 Texas 

R6

 Oklahoma 

R6

 West Virginia 

R3 

 California 

R9

 Wisconsin 

R5

 Indiana 

R5

As indicated previously, several states have requested that the number of other non‐formal

enforcement actions also be reported, although it is not required by the existing federal

regulation, to provide a more comprehensive view of their responses to noncompliance by the

nonmajor facilities. Such other enforcement, such as notices of violation or warning letters,

may help to encourage permittees to fix problems. However, if states are taking this approach

exclusively and still report high noncompliance rates, it is likely that a more vigorous

enforcement response is needed.  

6. Schedule‐Noncompliant Nonmajor Facilities

States indicated that, for calendar year 2008, 437 nonmajor permittees were one year or

more late in meeting construction deadlines within their compliance schedule. As illustrated in

Figure 4, seven states indicated that they had 20 or more such permittees; together, these

states have indicated that they have nearly 87% of the national total of such schedule‐

noncompliant nonmajor permittees.  

12
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

13

Figure 4. States with 20 or More Nonmajors One or More Years 

Behind Construction Schedule Deadlines

179

57

36 33

26 26 22

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

 Ohio 

R5

 West Virginia 

R3 

 South Carolina 

R4 

 Kentucky 

R4

 Mississippi 

R4

 Oklahoma 

R6

 Illinois 

R5 

The federal regulation requiring state submission of this information to EPA for ANCR

purposes states that “a separate list of nonmajor discharges which are one or more years

behind in construction phases of the compliance schedule shall also be submitted in

alphabetical order by name and permit number.” EPA has not verified the quality of the

information that has been provided.  Although Ohio has many more facilities in this category

than any other state, it is unclear whether this is truly the case, or whether they are doing a

better job tracking this information than other states.  For example, EPA did not receive

information for Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands (so

numbers in these states are not available in the national report).

If a facility is on a compliance schedule issued by the state or EPA, it is often a result of

previous noncompliance issues. If that facility is also missing construction schedules by a

significant amount of time, the facility has not yet succeeded in getting into compliance and

likely cannot yet ensure that its wastewater discharges will be in compliance with the applicable

permit limits until such construction is completed. In such situations, a closer examination of

the situation for possible enforcement escalation may be warranted to better ensure timely

and complete compliance. Attachment 3 provides the complete list of facilities that were

submitted.
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Attachment 1: Calendar Year 2008 ANCR Data for Each State, Grouped by Magnitude of Chan

Data Compared to Data in NPDES National Data Systems

State 

NonMajors 

Facility 

Universe 

(individ. 

permits 

only) 

NonMajors 

Reviewed1

Percent of 

NonMajors 

Reviewed1

Noncomplying 

NonMajors 

In Category 

I (SNC)2

Additional 

Noncomplying 

NonMajors 

in 

Category II 

only2

Total 

NonMajors 

in RNC or 

SNC, of 

those 

reviewed 

Total NonCompliance 

Rate for 

NonMajors 

Reviewed 

Category I 

Noncompliance 

Rate for 

NonMajors 

Reviewed 

Form

Enforce

Action

Noncom

NonMa

Data Source: Automated (National Database with No Changes by state/Region) 

 CT 77 71 92% 13 7 20 28% 18% 

 GM 3 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 

 NM 99 89 90% 66 5 71 80% 74% 

 MT 169 153 91% 110 7 117 76% 72% 

 ID 133 121 91% 89 17 106 88% 74% 

 OR tribal 4 4 100% 0 0 0 0% 0% 

Total: 485 438 90% 278 36 314 72% 63% 

Data Source: Automated with Adjustments (National System Data with Minor Adjustments [to noncompliance rate or univers

 ME 286 182 64% 118 54 172 95% 65% 

NY 1197 1013 85% 163 293 456 45% 16% PR 172 165 96% 96 64 160 97% 58% SR 2 2 100% 2 0 2 100% 100% 

VI 59 49 83% 48 0 48 98% 98% 

DC 10 10 100% 6 0 6 60% 60% 

WV 807 202 25% 170 27 197 98% 84% 

AR 672 650 97% 499 47 546 84% 77% 

AR Reg 3 2 67% 0 0 0 0% 0% 

OK 357 357 100% 208 30 238 67% 58% 

OK Reg 5 3 60% 3 0 3 100% 100% 

TX 2217 1865 84% 1341 131 1472 79% 72% 

Att 1‐1
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

State 

NonMajors 

Facility 

Universe 

(individ. 

permits 

only) 

NonMajors 

Reviewed1

Percent of 

NonMajors 

Reviewed1

Noncomplying 

NonMajors 

In Category 

I (SNC)2

Additional 

Noncomplying 

NonMajors 

in 

Category II 

only2

Total 

NonMajors 

in RNC or 

SNC, of 

those 

reviewed 

Total NonCompliance 

Rate for 

NonMajors 

Reviewed 

Category I 

Noncompliance 

Rate for 

NonMajors 

Reviewed 

Form

Enforce

Action

Noncom

NonMa

TX Reg 32 18 56% 16 1 17 94% 89% 

MP 1 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 

 AK 50 16 32% 14 1 15 94% 88% 

Total: 5,870 4,534 77% 2,684 648 3,332 73% 59% 

Automated Total 6,355 4,972 78% 2,962 684 3,646 73% 60% 

Data Source: Full Manual Reporting - State Chose to Report Manually or National System Data Was Adjusted Significantly by 

 MA 155 153 99% 0 39 39 25% 0% 

NH 45 45 100% 7 0 7 16% 16% 

 RI 68 66 97% 21 5 26 39% 32% VT 137 137 100% 0 74 74 54% 0% 

NJ 693 693 100% 12 84 96 14% 2% 

DE 33 33 100% 4 0 4 12% 12% 

VA 960 960 100% 88 65 153 16% 9% 

FL 240 191 80% 23 69 92 48% 12% 

GA 850 14 2% 0 0 0 0% 0% 

KY 1655 232 14% 209 21 230 99% 90% 

MS 1427 746 52% 177 346 523 70% 24% 

NC 1085 894 82% 54 135 189 21% 6% 

SC 351 208 59% 119 74 193 93% 57% 

TN 1246 45 4% 15 23 38 84% 33% 

IL 1395 1395 100% 304 688 992 71% 22% 

IN 1438 1398 97% 520 137 657 47% 37% 

Att 1‐2
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

State 

NonMajors 

Facility 

Universe 

(individ. 

permits 

only) 

NonMajors 

Reviewed1

Percent of 

NonMajors 

Reviewed1

Noncomplying 

NonMajors 

In Category 

I (SNC)2

Additional 

Noncomplying 

NonMajors 

in 

Category II 

only2

Total 

NonMajors 

in RNC or 

SNC, of 

those 

reviewed 

Total NonCompliance 

Rate for 

NonMajors 

Reviewed 

Category I 

Noncompliance 

Rate for 

NonMajors 

Reviewed 

Form

Enforce

Action

Noncom

NonMa

MI 449 449 100% 5 222 227 51% 1% 

MN 651 651 100% 100 155 255 39% 15% 

OH 3031 3025 100% 669 932 1601 53% 22% 

IA 1321 1321 100% 244 242 486 37% 18% 

KS 1047 913 87% 23 176 199 22% 3% 

MO 2923 2923 100% 407 232 639 22% 14% 

NE 606 599 99% 314 47 361 60% 52% 

CO 243 241 99% 67 25 92 38% 28% 

ND 95 45 47% 8 7 15 33% 18% 

SD 215 213 99% 84 16 100 47% 39% 

UT 86 83 97% 31 4 35 42% 37% 

WY 1695 1695 100% 16 132 148 9% 1% 

AS 3 3 100% 0 1 1 33% 0% 

GU 14 13 93% 1 1 2 15% 8% 

NV 74 74 100% 1 3 4 5% 1% 

WA 359 359 100% 38 155 193 54% 11% 

WA fed/tri 33 18 55% 4 0 4 22% 22% 

Total: 24,623 19,835 81% 3,565 4,110 7,675 39% 18% 

Data Source: Partial Manual Reporting - State Chose to Report Manually and Was Unable to Distinguish Category I and Categ

 MD 945 945 100% NR NR 33 3% NR 

 PA 3968 1550 39% NR NR 550 35% NR 

AL 1432 717 50% NR NR 516 72% NR WI 684 684 100% NR NR 365 53% NR LA 1209 661 55% NR NR 393 59% NR 

Att 1‐3
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Att 1‐4

State 

NonMajors 

Facility 

Universe 

(individ. 

permits 

only) 

NonMajors 

Reviewed1

Percent of 

NonMajors 

Reviewed1

Noncomplying 

NonMajors 

In Category 

I (SNC)2

Additional 

Noncomplying 

NonMajors 

in 

Category II 

only2

Total 

NonMajors 

in RNC or 

SNC, of 

those 

reviewed 

Total NonCompliance 

Rate for 

NonMajors 

Reviewed 

Category I 

Noncompliance 

Rate for 

NonMajors 

Reviewed 

Form

Enforce

Action

Noncom

NonMa

LA Reg 11 8 73% NR NR 2 25% NR 

AZ 82 82 100% NR NR 52 63% NR 

AZ tribal 13 13 100% NR NR 12 92% NR 

CA 353 353 100% NR NR 138 39% NR 

CA tribal 3 2 67% NR NR 2 100% NR 

HI 27 27 100% NR NR 8 30% NR 

NN 23 23 100% NR NR 19 83% NR 

OR 304 67 22% NR NR 15 22% NR 

Total: 9,054 5,132 57% NR NR 2105 41% NR 

National total: 40,032 29,939 75% 6,527 4,794 13,426 45% 26% 

1 "Reviewed" is defined as facilities whose limits have been reviewed and compared against DMRs at least once during the reporting y

type of compliance review by authorized regulatory authority. For states in green, automated review of noncompliance with effluent lim

system, without any further adjustments by those states. 

2 States with an NR in this column indicated that they can produce a noncompliance rate, but did not breakout the more serious Categ3 States with an NR in this column did not report the data. 

Notes A. Some states are not authorized to administer the NPDES program, thus EPA is the regulatory authority. EPA is the regulatory autho

MA, NM, and NH -- meaning that statistics here represent EPA activity. B. For states that are authorized, the numbers in this table do not reflect additional EPA enforcement activity, except where identified s

C. The state groupings on this page focused largely on significant changes to the noncompliance rate or the number of facilities in nonand WV) listed in the blue group did have significant changes in the number of formal enforcement actions taken, compared to the dat

national database. D. EPA does not currently require states to report discharge monitoring reports or other enforcement actions to the national database ffacility-specific noncompliance and enforcement data is widely available in ECHO for states in the green (automated) and blue (automThese states are reporting the data voluntarily. Data from other states is not well populated in ECHO. Users interested in this additiona
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

state. E. Under the NPDES program, EPA does not define a penalty action that carries no administrative order as a formal enforcement actiofind more enforcement cases than indicated in this table because ECHO will show when a state takes a penalty-only action. F. This report does not include smaller facilities that are considered "wet weather" sources, such as Concentrated Animal Feeding Ope

G. Category I violations are more serious violations -- using equivalent methods to EPA's calculation of significant noncompliance for m

than 20% over a toxics limit, more than 40% over a conventional limit, failure to submit reports, or failure to adhere to a compliance scall other violations. 

Att 1‐5
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Attachment 2: Description of Data Metrics

Metadata to be associated with the website for individual metricsExplain This (Metadata) Explain more about calcula# of Facilities Regulated The facilities counted under this measure are smaller permittees that are allowed to release specific

water effluents at levels specified in a permit. These facilities have individual permits, and normally

submit discharge reports on a monthly basis to the state (or EPA). The universe does not count large

major facilities, general permits, or wet weather permits.

% of Facilities Reviewed for Violations 

Facilities generally submit monthly discharge data. If states enter the discharge measurement data

into EPA's databases, violations are automatically calculated by the database (compare permitted

limit to measurement). Some states do not submit this information to EPA, but have their own

databases which calculate violations. This measure shows the percent of facilities that are routinely

reviewed for violations (through these automated calculations). Facilities not reviewed for violations

would typically submit paper discharge reports to the state (or EPA), but the state would file the

report without reviewing it. States that have a low percentage may not have the resources sufficient

to enter discharge data into a database, or review all submitted reports manually.

Percent of nonmajor faciliti

and standard permits that h

calculation of compliance (D

by a database), or data revi

inspection or manual file re

will count a facility as review

twelve monthly DMRs is en

% of Reviewed with Violations 

Of those facilities reviewed for violations, what percent have had noncompliance (e.g., measurement

is over the permitted limit). This is otherwise known as a "noncompliance rate." It excludes sources

that are not reviewed since the compliance status for those facilities is unknown. This rate includes

any violation of a permitted limit. The lower the percent, the fewer relative number of violations

occurred.

Number of "reviewed" in de

those with violations in num

% of Reviewed with Serious Violations 

The Clean Water Act regulations define more serious violations as "Category I." Generally, these are

flagged when a "toxic" pollutant is measured to be more than 20% over the permitted limit, or if a

"conventional" pollutant is more than 40% over limit. Failure to submit monitoring data is also a

serious violation. EPA's national databases automatically calculate Category I violations. States are

not required to enter this data into EPA's database (for smaller facilities). For states that do not enter

data to EPA, the state database should allow calculation of "Category I" violations. However, there

are some states that are not able to provide this information (so there is no data available).

Number of those "reviewed

number of those with Categ

numerator.

Att 2‐1
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Att 2‐2

% Violating Facilities with Formal Enforcement 

This compares the number of facilities with any violations to the number of enforcement actions that were taken. Note

that EPA guidance does not require formal actions for all violations. A formal action is a legal document compelling

compliance with permit requirements on a specified schedule. If violations are relatively minor, or are quickly resolved

through corrections by the permittee, formal actions may be unnecessary. If violations persist or turn more serious, the

state would be expected to escalate enforcement response, using either informal actions (e.g., notice of violation or

warning letter), or a formal action (which is counted here). A higher percent indicates that state more frequently takes

formal enforcement actions.

Number taken as 

number 

as the de

% Serious Violators with Formal Enforcement 

More serious violations (Category I), if not corrected by the facility quickly, may lead the state to pursue formal

enforcement. This calculation compares the number of enforcement actions to the number of serious violations

identified. Serious violations may include effluent violations, or failure to report discharge monitoring reports.

Total # of Formal Enforcement Actions This provides the total number of formal actions taken within the state by the authorized permitting authority. A formal

action is a legal document compelling compliance with permit requirements on a specified schedule.

Total nu

taken.
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Attachment 3: List of Facilities with Extended Compliance Schedules

Note – To get online ECHO reports for any of the facilities below, use the following URL, and

add the ID number for the facility after the “=” sign.  

http://www.epa‐echo.gov/cgi‐bin/get1cReport.cgi?tool=echo&IDNumber=

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Pleasant Oaks AR0041424 AR 

Sheridan AR0034347 AR 

Wabbaseka AR0039896 AR 

 

ASARCO, Inc January Adit AZ0025054 AZ 

ASARCO Mission Complex (Tribal 

Discharge) AZ0024635 AZ 

 

Nucla Station CO0000540 CO 

Bayfield Sanitation District CO0020273 CO 

Silver Bell Tailings Impoundmn CO0046931 CO 

Albia IA0036889 IA 

Blakesburg IA0028215 IA 

Camp Courageous of Iowa IA0071820 IA 

Edinburgh Manor of Jones County IA0065960 IA 

LeGrand IA0027235 IA 

Mount Ayr IA0023574 IA 

Onawa IA0036145 IA 

Pleasantville IA0035921 IA 

Troy Mills Sanitary Dist. IA0041262 IA 

AKZO Nobel Surface Chemsitry IL0026069 IL 

Aurora, City of IL0067555 IL 

Bookwalter Woods MHP IL0022896 IL 

Bunge Milling Inc IL0004235 IL 

Carroll Heights Ho. Assn STP IL0047261 IL 

Carus Chemical - LaSalle IL0002623 IL 

Clay City WWTP IL0020974 IL 

Country Circle MHP IL0045837 IL 

Deland WTP IL0052493 IL 

Depue STP IL0023523 IL 

Green River Industrial Park IL0048003 IL 

Hinsdale CSO IL0066818 IL 

Holy Family Villa Nursing Home IL0024678 IL 

Pingree Grove, Village of IL0077755 IL 

R.P. Donohoe Company IL0032042 IL 

Richmond STP IL0026093 IL 

Att 3‐1
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Sauk Valley Community College IL0047520 IL 

U.S. United Bard Line IL0073717 IL 

Winnebago WWTP IL0020672 IL 

Viola, City of KS0027880 KS 

Nickerson, City of KS0031097 KS 

Alvaton Elem School KY0082970 KY 

Blue Grass Airport KY0101851 KY 

Bradfordsville STP KY0090719 KY 

Catlettsburg STP KY0035467 KY 

Cumberland STP KY0021571 KY 

Dawson Springs STP KY0023868 KY 

Edgewood Subd KY0074977 KY 

Elkhorn City STP KY0020958 KY 

Executive Park Subd NMCSD KY0056561 KY 

Flemingsburg STP KY0021229 KY 

Frenchburg STP KY0040584 KY 

Fulton STP KY0026913 KY 

Green Acres MHP KY0033413 KY 

Hart Memorial Elem School KY0086932 KY 

Hidden Valley MHP KY0073679 KY 

Hiseville Elem School KY0083275 KY 

Jim Beam Brands Co Clermont KY0001660 KY 

Lagrange STP KY0020001 KY 

Legrande Elem School KY0086916 KY 

Lewisburg STP KY0024881 KY 

Liberty STP KY0024881 KY 

McKee STP KY0034444 KY 

Olive Hill STP KY0025925 KY 

Perryville STP KY0028355 KY 

Quality Sunoco KY0022144 KY 

Richardsville Elem School KY0092801 KY 

South Shore STP KY0026131 KY 

Tompkinsville STP KY0020702 KY 

Trenton STP KY0020982 KY 

Walton STP KY0039756 KY 

Warsaw STP KY0028118 KY 

Williamsburg STP KY0028347 KY 

Wingo STP KY0025852 KY 

not identified ME 

Essexville WWTP MI0022918 MI 

Pinconning Twp DDA WWSL MI0058313 MI 

not identified MN 

Att 3‐2
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Cape Fair Mobile MHP MO0125458 MO 

Cedar Meadows Subdivision MO0130729 MO 

Country Estates MHP MO0131504 MO 

Farmington Manor MO0056553 MO 

Grandview Plaza MHP MO0084395 MO 

Green Acres Subdivision MO0101541 MO 

Koshkonong WWTF MO0123404 MO 

LCU, Green Acres Subdivision MO0099228 MO 

New Salem Baptist Church MO0115363 MO 

R & E Sanitary Landfill MO0121231 MO 

Ryan's Lake Subdivision MO0121096 MO 

Sennawood Village MO0106577 MO 

Shalom Mountain WWTF MO0130311 MO 

Southwoods Estates MHP MO0113484 MO 

Bay Springs Industrial Park MS0034860 MS 

Bell Utilities of MS LLC MS0022829 MS 

Bell Utilities of MS LLC MS0031577 MS 

Bell Utilities of MS LLC MS0031585 MS 

Brooksville POTW MS0033596 MS 

Burrows Paper Corporation MS0000795 MS 

Choctaw Util Crystal Ridge Com MS0043460 MS 

Choctaw Util Standing Pine Lgn MS0043494 MS 

Choctaw Util Tucker Lagoon MS0040924 MS 

Chunky POTW MS0024767 MS 

Coastal Paper Company MS0033057 MS 

Coldwater POTW - North MS0026964 MS 

Coldwater POTW - Southwest MS0024678 MS 

Copiah County Industrial Park MS0032921 MS 

Destination RV Park MS0039250 MS 

Hilldale Water District Inc MS0052949 MS 

Lula POTW MS0025151 MS 

MS Band Choctaw Conehatta Schl MS0057649 MS 

O B Curtis Water treatment Plt MS0046906 MS 

Pecan Grove Trailer Park MS0047473 MS 

Platte Chemical Company MS0044962 MS 

Silver City POTW MS0044709 MS 

Sumrall POTW MS0035955 MS 

Taber Extrusions LP MS Division MS0002852 MS 

Western Line School District MS0051527 MS 

Worthington Cylinders Mississippi MS0052523 MS 

Amer Truetzschler Inc Truetzsc NC0085928 NC 

Beech Mountain Pond Creek WWTP NC0069761 NC 

Cherokee Trout Farm NC0054992 NC 

Hertford WWTP NC0021849 NC 

Att 3‐3
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Hexion Speciality Chem Inc Acm NC0003395 NC 

Hookerton WWTP NC0025712 NC 

Rowland WWTP NC0069612 NC 

Scotland Neck WWTP NC0023337 NC 

Winfall WTP NC0081850 NC 

Lyons WWTF NE0049182 NE 

Martinsburg WWTF NE0113948 NE 

Nebraska Energy LLC NE0131636 NE 

Brunswick Central School District NY0261343 NY 

Depew (V) Sanitary Overflows NY0203980 NY 

Dillon Farms SD NY0214507 NY 

Meilak's Mobile Court NY0078328 NY 

SI 3-Garage & Boro Repair Shop NY0200271 NY 

Tannersville (V) WWTP NY0026573 NY 

Westfield (V) WTP NY0171808 NY 

 

A & R Reck MHP OH0133809 OH 

A & R Reck Mobile Home Park OH0132098 OH 

Advanced Machining Inc OH0136484 OH 

Air BP OH0000736 OH 

Alpine Apla Restaurant OH0126144 OH 

Apollo MHP OH0135721 OH 

Arew Mobile Park OH0133469 OH 

Assen Dairy LLC OH0136166 OH 

Astabula County JVS OH0044920 OH 

Austin Respiratory OH0139327 OH 

Bear Creek Campground OH0117773 OH 

Bedford Trails Golf Course OH0128813 OH 

Bird's Nest Resort OH0135861 OH 

Blair Rubber Co OH0129844 OH 

Brookpark Estates Mobile OH0126527 OH 

Buckeye Deli OH0139432 OH 

Buckeye Transfer, Inc OH0011452 OH 

Butler Springs Christian Camp OH0137561 OH 

Camp Patmos OH0119431 OH 

Carter's Mobile Home Park OH0121258 OH 

Certified Oil Station 458 OH0136981 OH 

Charm Countryview Inn Inc OH0136832 OH 

Charm Engine OH0137022 OH 

Cher-Star LLC OH0131474 OH 

Chippewa Golf Course OH0136867 OH 

City of Nelsonville OH0020541 OH 

CLVKI DBA Kelly's Island H OH0119300 OH 

Congress Lake Clubhouse OH0134783 OH 

Consumers Ohio Water Co. OH0045446 OH 

Att 3‐4
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Cook Creek Golf Course OH0114103 OH 

Copley Square Water Company OH0033952 OH 

Copley Towne Centre OH0134724 OH 

Cordell Regional Utl., Inc. OH0036030 OH 

Country Lawn Nursing Home OH0129461 OH 

Cowans Market DBA Andis OH0139271 OH 

Creno's Pizza OH0114073 OH 

EGI OR Murkwith Tool Co., Inc OH0118397 OH 

Erie Islands Resort OH0102229 OH 

Excel Academy OH0136409 OH 

Firehouse Grille & Pub OH0139319 OH 

Fox's Den Campground OH0135844 OH 

Franklin Monroe Local School OH0133949 OH 

Frary's Restaurant OH0136841 OH 

Fred's Cheese & Deli OH0131423 OH 

Fremont Baptist Temple OH0135828 OH 

Frontier Local School Dist. OH0059323 OH 

Garden Ridge Nursery OH0132853 OH 

Gardenbrook Party Center OH0128732 OH 

Gary Finger, owner OH0119369 OH 

Geneva Trailer Park OH0134317 OH 

Gerber's Poultry Inc. OH0052132 OH 

Gina Dairy LLC OH0132888 OH 

Gionino's Pizza OH0136697 OH 

Grennan's Mobile Home Park OH0117129 OH 

Griffiths Healthcare Group LLC OH0134180 OH 

Hamlet Mobile Home Park OH0091740 OH 

Happy Valley Estates Mobile OH0127973 OH 

Harassment's Bar OH0139301 OH 

Hidden Valley Mobile Home OH0040657 OH 

Hilltop Group Home Inc OH0139441 OH 

Hilltop Meats OH0134112 OH 

Hockingport Mobile Home Park OH0115134 OH 

Holmes Co Winesburg Area SD OH0048691 OH 

Holmes County Landfill OH0122114 OH 

Hopewell Elementary School OH0136182 OH 

Hopewell Estates LLC OH0079278 OH 

Horn Land Company OH0101265 OH 

Horse & Harness Pub OH0139360 OH 

Hylen Souders Elem Sch OH0136255 OH 

IRBW Properties, LTD OH0130486 OH 

Jefferson County Commission OH0076350 OH 

Karman Rubber Co OH0133191 OH 

Knollwood Mobile Home Park OH0050334 OH 

Leading Creek Consrvy Dist OH0099279 OH 

Leafy Oaks Campground, Inc OH0126837 OH 

Le-O-Na Falls Mobile Home Park OH0133698 OH 

Att 3‐5
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Locust Ridge Nursing Home Inc OH0137537 OH 

Lorain Tubular Company, LLC OH0129003 OH 

Mack Ind of Pennsylvania Inc OH0134554 OH 

Manchester Middle School OH0139581 OH 

Maple Grove Dairy LLC OH0138274 OH 

Maragos Traileer Park OH0125113 OH 

Marion Cty Comm./Courthouse OH0036765 OH 

Marne Manor LLC OH0136123 OH 

Mathews High School OH0129089 OH 

McEquities LLC OH0138401 OH 

Midwest Poultry Serv Sunny OH0133744 OH 

Mohican Wilderness Campground OH0136212 OH 

Morris Bean Company OH0040576 OH 

National Park Service OH0117340 OH 

Neal Elementary School OH0129097 OH 

Nitram, Inc. OH0045179 OH 

North Nimishillen Elementary OH0133175 OH 

Northbrook Mobile Home Pk LLC OH0131971 OH 

Northwest Shores Investors OH0138126 OH 

OC Properties MHP Management OH0123188 OH 

ODOT District 5 Headquarters OH0101664 OH 

Ohio Star Forge Company OH0133094 OH 

Ohio Valley Coal Company OH0012661 OH 

Ole Mill Craft Build OH0137090 OH 

Ottawa Co Commissioners OH0095435 OH 

Ottawa Co Regional WTP OH0122157 OH 

Pentair Water Treatment OH0051551 OH 

Pentecostal Holiness OH0137383 OH 

Pilot Travel Center LLC OH0121002 OH 

Pine Lakes Estate No 1 OH0136387 OH 

Pleasant Acres MHP OH0120910 OH 

Pleasant Acres MHP OH0137596 OH 

Pleasant Local Schools OH0138312 OH 

Post Office & Harness Shop OH0137031 OH 

Prairie House Apartments OH0136972 OH 

Praxair Inc. OH0101117 OH 

Raber General Store OH0137103 OH 

RBB Systems Inc OH0139378 OH 

Regal Inn/Khaliq Farooqui, owner OH0136042 OH 

Restover MHP OH0136301 OH 

Riceland Mobile Village OH0121606 OH 

Ridgedale Elementary School OH0138339 OH 

Seven Hill Medical Arts Inc. OH0132101 OH 

Shady Knoll MHP OH0136735 OH 

Sheldon Farms OH0138690 OH 

Smith's Pleasant Valley OH0129518 OH 

Southeast Local Sch Dist OH0103217 OH 

Att 3‐6
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Southern Ohio Community OH0137502 OH 

Southview Estates MHP OH0095419 OH 

Sparkle Market-Dollar OH0136964 OH 

SpruceTree Village MHP OH0134503 OH 

St John the Baptist Church OH0046973 OH 

Star Lanes, Inc OH0132721 OH 

Stateline Properties LLC OH0133884 OH 

Sugar Grove Bible Church OH0137391 OH 

Sun Oil Co. of Pennsylvania OH0007641 OH 

Sundial MHP Stu 1 OH0136671 OH 

Tecumseh Village MHP OH0044962 OH 

Tee Pee Campground OH0138746 OH 

The Beazer Group OH0003514 OH 

The Caddyshack OH0119334 OH 

The Hall Chemical Company OH0051390 OH 

The Skyway OH0138053 OH 

Tim Arbruster OH0133388 OH 

Timber Lanes OH0132039 OH 

Times Square Restaurant OH0129950 OH 

Town & Country Park Estates OH0137014 OH 

Trumbull County Commissioners OH0092550 OH 

Tubetech Incorporated OG0101206 OH 

Union Co. Commissioners OH0039144 OH 

Unique Ventures Group LLC OH0138037 OH 

Valley View MHP OH0133787 OH 

Van Ham Dairy OH0132829 OH 

Victory Park Resort OH0135810 OH 

Village of Adena OH0021661 OH 

Village of Arlington OH0030007 OH 

Village of Attica OH0023957 OH 

Village of Cadiz OH0024295 OH 

Village of Covington OH0020761 OH 

Village of Deshler OH0022471 OH 

Village of Georgetown OH0021300 OH 

Village of Glendale OH0020141 OH 

Village of Latty OH0058246 OH 

Village of Leesburg OH0050881 OH 

Village of McComb OH0042081 OH 

Village of Milan OH0022641 OH 

Village of Millersburg OH0020168 OH 

Village of Minerva OH0021849 OH 

Village of North Baltimore OH0041637 OH 

Village of Prospect OH0047902 OH 

Village of Sardinia OH0020729 OH 

Village of Somerset OH0023566 OH 

Vinoy Sood OH0134775 OH 

Wagon Wheel Inn Inc OH0087904 OH 

Att 3‐7
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Walker Elementary School OH0133205 OH 

Walnut Creek Mennonite Church OH0139084 OH 

Watsons Towing Inc OH0139157 OH 

Western Reserve Local Schools OH0125776 OH 

Wildcat Woods Campground OH0137529 OH 

Wildflower Place OH0126578 OH 

Williams Co Commissioners OH0079081 OH 

Wooster Rolling Wheels OH0129763 OH 

Yogi's MHP OH0136328 OH 

Adair OK0027197 OK 

Ardmore Airpark OK0030422 OK 

Bokchito OK0028177 OK 

Braggs OK0027014 OK 

Eastern State College OK0034550 OK 

Fairland OK0021504 OK 

Jet OK0031887 OK 

Kellyville OKG580012 OK 

Lake Valley Mobile Home Ranch OK0037702 OK 

Langston PWA OK0027511 OK 

Locust Grove OK0022772 OK 

Nowata OK0034517 OK 

Ochelata OK0034517 OK 

Oilton OK0035599 OK 

Okemah OK0020737 OK 

Pensacola OK0040410 OK 

Picher OK0032263 OK 

Quapaw not identified OK 

Rogers #3 OK0045349 OK 

Rogers #4 OK0045357 OK 

Savanna OK0030708 OK 

Seminole #3 OK0026972 OK 

Sperry OK0033464 OK 

Tonkawa OK0021903 OK 

Wetumka North OK0032425 OK 

Wetumka South OK0032417 OK 

BCW&SA/St Stephen WWTP SC0025259 SC 

Bellemeade SD SC0030988 SC 

Carolina Mobile Court WWTF SC0032212 SC 

Chesterfield/Thompson Creek SC0025232 SC 

Chickasaw Pointe SD SC0048259 SC 

Cross High School SC0027103 SC 

GSW&SA/Longs WWTP SC0040878 SC 

Harbor Gate Condominiums SC0021849 SC 

Isaquenna Village SC0023141 SC 

Kershaw/Hanging Rock Creek SC0025798 SC 

Att 3‐8
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

KMBT Shipyard River Terminal SC0048046 SC 

Lakeview Steak House SC0030465 SC 

Lamar WWTF SC0043702 SC 

Latta, Town of SC0025402 SC 

Martek Biosciences Kingstree SC0003123 SC 

McAfee Mobile Home Park SC0027111 SC 

Middleton Inn SC0039063 SC 

Mt Pleasant/WTR #2 SC0043273 SC 

Naco/Carolina Landing Campgr SC0022063 SC 

Neelys Creek Homes, Inc. SC0041904 SC 

North Safety Products SC0002801 SC 

Pamplico, Town of SC0021351 SC 

Petroliance LLC/Charleston SC0047261 SC 

Pickens Co PSc/Central-North SC0024996 SC 

Piney Grove Ut/Franklin Park SC0031399 SC 

R C Edwards Jr High School SC0028762 SC 

REWA/Marietta WWTP SC0026883 SC 

Rolling Meadows MHP SC0033685 SC 

SC Dprt/Table Rock State Park SC0024856 SC 

SCE&G/Fairfield Pumped Storage SC0035904 SC 

SCE&G/Saluda Hydro Station SC0002071 SC 

South of the Border Motel SC0031801 SC 

Tega Cay WWTP #2 SC0026743 SC 

Utils Srvs of SC/Carowood SD SC0038113 SC 

Utils Srvs of SC/Shandon WWTP SC0027189 SC 

West Pelzer WWTF SC0025194 SC 

City of Canova SD0021521 SD 

not identified WA 

not identified WA 

Toppenish, City of WA0026123 WA 

Wapato, City of WA0050229 WA 

Automatic Recycling WV0116033 WV 

Berkeley County PSSD WV0105791 WV 

Bethany Town of WV0022080 WV 

Boone-Raleigh PSD WV0086525 WV 

Buffalo Town of WV0021694 WV 

Burnsville Public Utilities WV0021945 WV 

Caeot Corp WV0001310 WV 

Canyon PSD WV0032159 WV 

Charmanville Town of WV0024673 WV 

City of Belmont WV0024490 WV 

Claywood Park PSD WV0043991 WV 

Colfax PSD WV0032131 WV 

Cowen PSD WV0037397 WV 

Att 3‐9
2008 Annual Noncompliance Report

Att 3‐10

List of Facilities > 1 yr. behind Compliance Schedule Deadlines 

Facility Name 

NPDES Permit 

Number State 

Davis Town of WV0024848 WV 

Enlarged Repliban PSD WV0081001 WV 

Flatwoods-Canoe Run WV0084042 WV 

Friendly PSD WV0048561 WV 

Greater Harrison Cnty PSD WV0084301 WV 

Hinton Sanitary SD WV0024732 WV 

Iaeger Town of WV0024511 WV 

Junior Town of WV0040843 WV 

Kingwood, City of WV0021881 WV 

Linde LLC WV0001775 WV 

Mannington City of WV0024953 WV 

Marlinton City of WV0024473 WV 

Mason Cnty PSD WV0086886 WV 

Mason Cnty PSD WV0105619 WV 

Matewan Town of WV0024783 WV 

Mineral Wells PSD WV0081141 WV 

Montgomery City of WV0020621 WV 

Moorefield City of WV0020150 WV 

Mullens City of WV0020681 WV 

New Cumberland City of WV0025119 WV 

New Haven Town of WV0032531 WV 

New Vrincaban Community WV0102253 WV 

Parsons City of WV0022063 WV 

Philippi, City of WV0021857 WV 

Pleasant View PSD WV0027642 WV 

PNGI Charles Town Gaming LLC WV0105856 WV 

PCCA Sanitary BD Town of WV0027154 WV 

Prichard Public Service District WV0105732 WV 

Richwood City of WV0022004 WV 

Rowlesburg Town of WV0027481 WV 

Shepherdstown Corp of WV0024775 WV 

Smithers City of WV0021741 WV 

St Mary's City of WV0020168 WV 

Stanaford Acres Sewerage System WV0084824 WV 

Thomas, City of WV0024856 WV 

Town of Elizabeth WV0041505 WV 

Tunnelton Town of WV0105651 WV 

Universal Forest Products East WV0076724 WV 

Webster Springs PSD WV0049875 WV 

West Hamlin Town of WV0020176 WV 

Williamsburg Sewer System WV0082091 WV 

Williamstown, City of WV0022071 WV 

Wood Cnty Parks and Rec WV0045616 WV 

WV Division of Natural Resources WV0082210 WV