alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(September 19, 1963)

#### Stephen Grenda et al., Appellants, v. City Service Taxi et al., Respondents.

Appeal from order entered November 14, 1962, unanimously dismissed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: No appeal lies from this order rendered upon a default. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 557; *Consumers Inds.*v. *ABC Insulation Co.,*285 App. Div. 1176.) Order entered November 27, 1962, unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any *796party, and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: On' the papers presented, in the exercise of reasonable discretion the motion should have been granted. Appeal from order entered January 2, 1963, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic, (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to diligently prosecute the same; also appeal from order denying plaintiffs’ motion to set aside above order and denying leave to serve complaint; also appeal from order denying plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the above two orders.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman and MeClusky, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 422 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 422

       Designating March 2, 2018, as ``Read Across America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2018

 Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Reed, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
 Carper, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Markey, Ms. Hassan, and Mr. 
 Durbin) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating March 2, 2018, as ``Read Across America Day''.

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education and professional 
        success and a source of pleasure throughout life;
Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read if the United 
        States is to remain competitive in the global economy;
Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading intervention and providing 
        additional resources for reading assistance, including through the 
        programs authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
        1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations for 
        library and literacy programs; and
Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned about reading and 
        education have joined with the National Education Association to 
        designate March 2, the anniversary of the birth of Theodor Geisel 
        (commonly known as ``Dr. Seuss''), as a day to celebrate reading: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 2, 2018, as ``Read Across America 
        Day'';
            (2) honors--
                    (A) all authors for their success in encouraging 
                children to discover the joy of reading; and
                    (B) the 21st anniversary of Read Across America 
                Day; and
            (3) encourages--
                    (A) parents, educators, and communities to read 
                with children for at least 30 minutes on Read Across 
                America Day and promote a love of reading and 
                opportunities for all children to see themselves 
                reflected in literature in honor of the commitment of 
                the Senate to building a country of readers; and
                    (B) the people of the United States to observe Read 
                Across America Day with appropriate ceremonies and 
                activities.
                                 <all>
```
124 STAT. 1260 PUBLIC LAW 111–177—JUNE 8, 2010 

Public Law 111–177 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for the International Organizations Immunities Act to be extended 

to the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the 

International Civilian Office in Kosovo. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extending Immunities to the 

Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 

the International Civilian Office in Kosovo Act of 2010’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO EXTEND THE PROVISIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IMMUNITIES ACT TO THE 

OFFICE OF THE HIGH REPRESENTATIVE IN BOSNIA AND 

HERZEGOVINA AND THE INTERNATIONAL CIVILIAN OFFICE 

IN KOSOVO. 

The International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 

288 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

section: 

‘‘SEC. 17. The provisions of this title may be extended to the 

Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina (and 

to its officers and employees) or the International Civilian Office 

in Kosovo (and to its officers and employees) in the same manner, 

to the same extent, and subject to the same conditions, as such 

provisions may be extended to a public international organization 

in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty 

or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such 

participation or making an appropriation for such participation. 

Any such extension may provide for the provisions of this title 

to continue to extend to the Office of the High Representative 

in Bosnia and Herzegovina (and to its officers and employees) 

or the International Civilian Office in Kosovo (and to its officers 

and employees) after that Office has been dissolved.’’. 

SEC. 3. BUDGET COMPLIANCE. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

22 USC 288f–7. 

Extending 

Immunities to 

the Office of the 

High Representative in Bosnia 

and Herzegovina 

and the International Civilian 

Office in Kosovo 

Act of 2010. 

22 USC 288 note. 

June 8, 2010 

[H.R. 5139] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 111–177—JUNE 8, 2010 124 STAT. 1261 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5139: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

May 19, considered and passed House. 

May 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 

to the vote on passage. 

Approved June 8, 2010. 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 July 20, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-10065

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

Agency Docket No. 12-CV-23440

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner-Cross Respondent,

versus

FISHER ISLAND HOLDINGS, LCC,

FISHER ISLAND CLUB, INC., et al.,

Respondents-Cross Petitioners.

________________________

 Application for Enforcement of an Order

of the National Labor Relations Board

_________________________

(July 20, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) applies to this court for

enforcement of its order issued against Fisher Island Holdings, LLC (“Fisher”). For
2

the reasons stated in Member Meisburg’s dissenting opinion, we conclude that

NLRB’s finding that Fisher violated 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) is not supported by

substantial evidence. See Int’l Bhd. of Boilermakers v. NLRB, 127 F.3d 1300, 1306

(11th Cir. 1997). NLRB’s application for enforcement of its cease and desist order

is therefore denied. NLRB’s order requiring that a new employee representation

election be held is not a final order within the meaning of § 160(f) and is therefore

unreviewable at this time. See Florida Bd. Of Bus. Regulation v. NLRB, 686 F.2d

1362, 1366 n.8 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Cooper/T. Smith, Inc. v. NLRB, 177 F.3d

1259, 1261 n.1 (11th. Cir 1999) (stating that an employer can obtain review of a

Board representation decision only by refusing to bargain after a union is certified).

For that reason, NLRB’s application for enforcement must be denied in full. 

DENIED.
Exhibit 4.17
 
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
 
The undersigned hereby execute, acknowledge, and deliver to the Secretary of State of South Dakota the following Articles of Amendment:
 
1.        The name of the corporation is Black Hills Corporation.
 
2.        The following amendment was adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation on June 20, 2000:
 
Article I of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended to read as follows:
 
The name of the Corporation is Black Hills Power and Light Company.
 
3.        The number of shares of the Corporation outstanding at the time of such adoption was 20,428,852, and the number of shares entitled to vote thereon was 20,428,852.
 
4.        The number of shares voted for such amendment was 12,987,600, which was 70.4% of all issued and outstanding shares at this time.  The number of shares voted against this amendment was 1,861,557.  The number of shares abstaining from voting on this amendment was 2,225,459.  The number of shares held by brokers and not voted was 3,354,236.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Black Hills Corporation were executed on this 22nd day of December, 2000.
 


	
   

  	
  BLACK
  HILLS CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/
  James M. Mattern

  
	 
	 
	James M. Mattern

	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its
  Senior Vice President - Corporate Administration

  



 

















 


	
   

  	
  And

  	
  /s/
  Roxann R. Basham

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Roxann
  R. Basham

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its Vice President -
  Controller and Corporate Secretary

  



 
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
BLACK HILLS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
 
The undersigned hereby execute, acknowledge, and deliver to the Secretary of State of South Dakota the following Articles of Amendment:
 
1.        The name of the corporation is Black Hills Power and Light Company.
 
2.        The following amendment was adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation on June 20, 2000:
 
Article I of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended to read as follows:
 
The name of the Corporation is Black Hills Power, Inc.
 
3.        The number of shares of the Corporation outstanding at the time of such adoption was 100,  and the number of shares entitled to vote thereon was 100.
 
4.        The number of shares voted for such amendment was 100. The number of shares voted against this amendment was 0.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  these Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Black Hills Power and Light Company were executed on this 22nd day of December, 2000.
 


	
   

  	
  BLACK
  HILLS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/
  James M. Mattern

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  James
  M. Mattern

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its Senior Vice President
  - Corporate Administration

  



 















 


	
   

  	
  And

  	
  /s/
  Roxann R. Basham

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Roxann
  R. Basham

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Its
  Vice President - Controller and Corporate Secretary
Attachment 1

FGD Wastewater Treatment Diagram
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Arbor EnTech Corporation (the “registrant”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Harvey Houtkin,
      Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.




June
        13,
        2007


/s/ Harvey
                HoutkinHarvey
                    Houtkin
                Chief
                    Executive Officer
253.213 Simplified acquisition procedures (SF's 18, 30, 44, 1165, 1449, and OF's 336, 347, and 348). ( f ) DoD uses the DD Form 1155, Order for Supplies or Services, instead of OF 347; and OF 336, Continuation Sheet, instead of OF 348. Follow the procedures at PGI 253.213(f) for use of forms.
[71 FR 3413, Jan. 23, 2006]
# C_2017124EN.01000102.xml

| 21.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8442 — Ardian/Groupe Prosol)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 124/02)

On 10 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8442. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8442. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2



	 	 	 	 	 



SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 



Compensation: Non-employee directors shall receive the following remuneration:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Cash retainer
	 	$80,000	 
	Lead Director retainer
	 	$25,000	 
	Committee fee (non-Audit Committee)
	 	$10,000 per committee
	Audit Committee fee
	 	$15,000	 
	Committee Chair fee (non-Audit Committee)
	 	$20,000	 
	Audit Committee Chair fee
	 	$25,000	 
	Deferred Stock Payment
	 	$60,000	 
	Stock Options
	 	6,140 options






      





     Directors may elect to defer payment of their fees under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation
Plan. Under this Plan, a non-employee director may elect to have payment of all or a portion of
the director’s fees deferred and credited to a deferred stock account or into a deferred cash
account. If a director chooses to defer fees into a deferred stock account, SUPERVALU then credits
the director’s account with an additional amount equal to 10 percent of the amount of fees the
director has elected to defer and contributes the total amount in the director’s account to an
irrevocable grantor (“rabbi”) trust that uses the amount to purchase shares of SUPERVALU common
stock, which are then allocated to an account for the director under the trust. Each director is
entitled to direct the trustee to vote all shares allocated to the director’s account in the trust.
The common stock in each director’s deferred stock account will be distributed to the director
after the director leaves the Board. Until that time, the trust assets remain subject to the claims
of our creditors. Dividends paid on the shares of common stock held in each of the directors’
accounts are used to purchase additional shares for these accounts each quarter. If a director
chooses to defer all or a portion of fees into a deferred cash account, interest is payable on the
amount of deferred cash compensation at an annual rate equal to the twelve-month rolling average of
Moody’s Corporate Average Bond Index for the twelve-month period ending in the month of October
preceding the first day of the calendar year. Payment in cash is made from the cash account
following retirement from the Board.
223.7201 Policy. ( a ) The requirements of DoD Manual 5100.76, Physical Security of Sensitive Conventional Arms, Ammunition, and Explosives, shall be applied to contracts when— ( 1 ) AA&E will be provided to the contractor or subcontractor as Government-furnished property; or
( 2 ) The principal development, production, manufacture, or purchase of AA&E is for DoD use.
( b ) The requirements of DoD Manual 5100.76 need not be applied to contracts when— ( 1 ) The AA&E to be acquired under the contract is a commercial product within the meaning of FAR 2.101; or
( 2 ) The contract will be performed in a Government-owned contractor-operated ammunition production facility. However, if subcontracts issued under such a contract will meet the criteria of paragraph (a) of this section, the requirements of DoD Manual 5100.76 shall apply.
[61 FR 7743, Feb. 29, 1996, as amended at 88 FR 6583, Jan. 31, 2023; 88 FR 80466, Nov. 17, 2023]
2414.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award. ( e ) The determination to allow a bidder to: Correct a mistake in bid discovered before award (other than obvious clerical errors); withdraw a bid; or, neither correct nor withdraw a bid shall be submitted to the Head of the Contracting Activity for approval.
[57 FR 59788, Dec. 15, 1992. Redesignated at 61 FR 19470, May 1, 1996]
# C_2017056EN.01000102.xml

| 22.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8351 — Apollo Management/Lumileds Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 56/02)

On 15 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8351. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8351. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Publications
Table of Contents
t South Coast 

Air Quality Management District 

CEMI 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 9 1 765-4 1 78 

' 0 9 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov 

Matt Miyasato, Ph. D. 

Science and Technology Advancement 

W 909.396.3249 B mmiyasato@aqmd.gov 

July 19, 2013 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld, Region Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

The South Coast Air Quality Managenient District (SCAQMD) is responsible for submitting 

National Core (NCore), State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS), Photochemical 

Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS), National Air Toxics Trends Stations (NATTS) and 

air quality data to the Air Quality System (AQS) for those AQS monitors under the control of 

SCAQMD. 

In accordailce with 40 CFR Part 58, this letter certifies tllat the following ambient concentration 

data and the quality assurance data are completely submitted to AQS: 

• 2012 FRM 03 

• 2012 FRM NO2 

• 2012 FRM CO 

• 2012 FRM S02 

The above ambient data are accurate to the best of my knowledge, taking into consideration the 

quality assurance findings. 

This letter of certification fulfills in part the certification objectives of the Section 105 Grant for 

Fiscal Year 2013. A separate letter to certify the remaining 2012 ambient concentration data 

will be submitted shortly to complete the certification objectives. 

The required summary reports for 2012 have been sent electronically to Mr. Fletcher Clover 

atld Dr. Meredith Kurpius at U.S. EPA Region 9. 
South C'oas! Air Uuality Manaxement District 

Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (909) 396- 

3249, or Dr. Andrea Polidori, Quality Assurance Manager, Science and 'rechnology 

Advancement, at (909) 396-3283. 

Matt Miyas o, h.D. 

Deputy Executrve Officer 

Science and Technology Advancement 

MMM: PMF: AP 

cc: J. Low 

R. Eden 

J. Cassmassi 

M. Leonard 

-2-
250.103-5 Processing cases. ( 1 ) At the time the request is filed, the activity shall prepare the record described at PGI 250.101-3(1)(i) and forward it to the appropriate official within 30 days after the close of the month in which the record is prepared.
( 2 ) The officer or official responsible for the case shall forward to the contract adjustment board, through departmental channels, the documentation described at PGI 250.103-5.
( 3 ) Contract adjustment boards will render decisions as expeditiously as practicable. The Chair shall sign a memorandum of decision disposing of the case. The decision shall be dated and shall contain the information required by FAR 50.103-6. The memorandum of decision shall not contain any information classified “Confidential” or higher. The board's decision will be sent to the appropriate official for implementation.