alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,700
<INVENTORY>                                     43,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,462
<PP&E>                                         185,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,898
<BONDS>                                        114,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,374
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,784
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,915
<SALES>                                         91,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,982
<CGS>                                           60,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,171
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,171
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
<FN>
<F1>Current info. is for 1st quarter of this fiscal year-end
</FN>


</TABLE>
## BCAeronautics Training Manual

NOTES: Dual flight controls will be utilized when possible. Compliance with the NPRM regarding sUASs makes this a dynamic document. As of MAY2015, necessary certifications include, at least but not limited to, sport pilot and current third class medical or valid US driver’s license. Training scenarios must be dedicated as such and progress to Initial Operating Experience.
PROCEDURES: Preflight: Inspect sUAS, flight controller, batteries for damage in regards to go/no go functionality. Take care to visually and physically inspect airfoils for corruption.
Environmental/Situational Awareness: Identify obstacles at the surface (lateral visual inspection 360o) Identify obstacles at 20ft AGL, 50ft AGL, 75-150ft AGL (laterally and horizontally 360o) ALWAYS SET RTHfunction altitude with regard to environment. PIC (trainer) and VO commence airborne traffic scanning (all flight levels/all directions). Secure ground station with regards to non-participants and impediments to focused control of sUAS Flight Procedures: Takeoff in concordance with DJI flight manuals. Maintain no less than 10ft laterally from ground station and 7ft AGL vertically and initiate hover in place> check for flight stability> execute left and right 360 separately and check for control response and stability> execute descent then ascent (do not exceed 12ft AGL) check for control response and stability. *In the event of loss of control or instability initiate Return to Home Function then manually execute hard landing with immediate landing as the prime objective. After stable and responsive flight has been verified in accordance with DJI Ops MANUALs: >execute maneuvers required for data acquisition (predetermined) at 20-400ft AGL in ascending order by altitude (increments shall increase exponentially)Attention should be directed to maintaining VLOS (reliance on camera system not approved).

Practice evasive descent maneuvers for airborne traffic. Practice evasive lateral maneuvers for fixed/ground obstacles. Ascents for the purpose of avoiding traffic are not approved. Ascents for the purpose of avoiding fixed/ground based obstacles should be secondary to lateral movements. Attention to battery limit and teamwork with VO should be gradually increased. After predetermined training maneuvers have been executed> begin controlled descent> utilize reverse of takeoff procedure regarding obstacles> utilize RTHfunction as necessary (only allow automated landing as a last resort) Identify flat surface (takeoff location preferable) for smooth controlled landing in accordance with DJI OPs MANUAL.

Post Flight Review all portions of flight then check mission data for specific information and address deviations from planned activity and DJI OPs MANUAL. Log flight time 100 flight cycles and 25 operational hours are suggested for certification along with any and all regulatory changes in the NPRM.
# C_2017096EN.01000102.xml

| 28.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8377 — SPIE/SAG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 96/02)

On 20 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8377. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8377. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mlntteb**~tate5 ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI5** 

# for tbejfeberaI**~trcutt**

IN RE FUSION-10, INC., Petitioner.

Miscellaneous Docket No. 139

On Petition for Writ ofMandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District ofTexas in case no. 11-CV-0391, Judge Rodney Gilstrap.

ORDER Fusion-io, Inc. submits a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the United States District Court for the Eastern District ofTexas to grant its motion to transfer a severed portion ofthe action to the United States District Court for the District ofUtah. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: Solid State Storage Systems, Inc. IS directed to respond no later than October 4, 2012. Case: 12-139 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 09/26/2012IN RE FUSION-IO, INC.
FOR THE COURT 2



## SEP 26 2012 Date 

### lsi Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott F. Partridge, Esq. Christopher James Mierzejewski, Esq. David Sochia, Esq. U.S. District Court, E.D. Tex., Clerk s8


### FILED U.s. COURTOFAPPeALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

## SEP 26 

## l012 JAN HORBAlY 

### CLERK Case: 12-139 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 09/26/2012
EXHIBIT
32(a)




PHARMOS
CORPORATION


SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS




In
connection with the annual report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, ROBERT F.
JOHNSTON, Executive Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.




This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




Date:
February 27, 2009




By:
      /s/ Robert F.
  Johnston








In
connection with the annual report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, S. COLIN NEILL,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.










This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




Date:
February 27, 2009




By:
      /s/ S. Colin
  Neill






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by
Pharmos Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
FILED trHAsE(.^r

rt[t: zo zots lo

THOMASG. BRUTON

CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Court Orders and Levies

P.O. Box 183164

Columbus, OH 43218-3164

Phone: 1-866-578-7022 -

-

-

-

--

IL - US DISTRICT COURT

219 S DEARBORN STREET

cHtcAGo, lL 60604

RE: FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE COMPANY v. IRA KAUFMAN Case No.: 12C4693, lL - US DISTRICT COUffi

rd

N

e.€i)

l'I i

,;*';,

t,]

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is in receipt of your CITATION TO DTSCOVER ASSETS against the following OS(s)' lnn

KAUFMAN

Accounts which are held:

Account Number

3275

The Present Balance may be subject to claims which may reduce the amount available to the judgment creditor,

including without limitation: exemptions asserted by the judgment debtor; rights of third parties asserting an interest in

the account; intervening levies or court orders; IRS levies; right of setoff; deposited items returned against the account,

or warranty claims asserted with respect to checks or other items credited to the account balance.

Answers

These responses are based upon a search of data contained in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A's centralized customer identification and account information

system. That system may not necessarily capture all relevant information concerning the judgment debtor(s) or accounts.

Amount of Hold

4668282.02

Present Balance

1122.50

COAL-1 0Dec1 9-5006

SD_SwornDocumentExecution_O00207660079

437

)id you have in your possession,

:ustody or control any personal

rroperty or monies belonging to the

udoment debtor?

res

s this an IRA account or are all

unds in the account(s) exempt

unds?

tlo

s/are the account(s) current

lalance equal to or less than the

otal of the exempt deposits?

tlo

-rst all electronrc deposrts rnto

rccount(s) and their source(s):

RATKAU F M A64EE27 PAYRO LL, I RATKAU F M A6 48827 PAY RO LL,

RATKAU F M A648827 PAYRO LL, I RATKAU F M A648827 PAYRO LL,

RATKAU F M A648827 PAYRO LL, I RATKAU F M A6 48827 PAYRO LL

-ist adverse claims {/A

Page 'l of 2
Please allow this letter to serve as JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A's answer to the CITATION TO DISCOVER ASSETS. lf you should have any questions

regarding this matter, please contact JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. at 1-866-578-7022.

I CERTIFY THAT THE STATEMENTS ABOVE ARE TRUE.

Doc Review Sr Specialist ll

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Court Orders and Levips Department

COAL-10Dec19-5006

S D_Swom DocumentExecution_000207660079

A37

Page2 ot 2

I
#### 19.1501 [Reserved]
(October 29, 1964)

#### Richard F. Ahlheim et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and facts, by reducing the amount of the award to- $13,600, and as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: The award of consequential damages in the amount of $25,400 was based on damages resulting from taking of claimants’ land and the taking of lands on both sides of claimants’ premises. Claimants were not entitled to consequential damages resulting from taking of their neighbors’ lands. *(Campbell*v. *United States,*266 U. S. 368, 377; *Matter of New York, West Shore & Buffalo Ry. Co.,*101 N. Y. 685; *Boyd*v. *United States,*222 F. 2d 493.) The amount awarded for consequential damages should, therefore, be reduced to the amount sustained as a result of the taking of claimants’ land which we find to be $12,000. This amount added to direct damages of $1,600 found by the trial court shows that the total damages sustained by claimants amount to $13,600. (Supplemental argument on appeal by State from a judgment of the Court of Claims for claimants.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veeehio, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 19 (Monday, February 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02008]



[[Page 7784]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee; Change

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting; change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register notice that was originally published 
on January 22, 2021, (Volume 86, Number 13, Page 6740) the time for 
this meeting has changed from 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time to 1:30 p.m. 
Eastern Time. All other meeting details remain the unchanged.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 
317-3087.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Wednesday, February 10, 
2021 at 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Fred Smith. For more information please contact Fred 
Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at 
the website: http://www.improveirs.org.

    Dated: January 26, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-02008 Filed 1-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 25, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 25, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0081. TIMOTHY LITTLEJOHN v. AMBER GROVE et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2110009
EXHIBIT 10.32

                                      ELXSI
                              3600 Rio Vista Avenue
                                     Suite A
                             Orlando, Florida 32805

<PAGE>

                                                                   June 25, 1999
Cadmus Corporation
3600 Rio Vista Avenue
Suite A
Orlando, Florida  32805

              $2,000,000 SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE DUE JUNE 30, 1999

Dear Sirs:

     Reference is made to that certain $2,000,000 Secured Promissory Note, dated
June 30, 1997 (the "Cadmus->ELXSI Note"), of Cadmus Corporation, a Massachusetts
corporation ("Cadmus"), payable to the undersigned ELXSI, a California
corporation ("ELXSI"). The Cadmus->ELXSI Note matures on June 30, 1999 and
provides for interest payable at an annual rate of 15%.

     1.  EXTENSION. ELXSI hereby agrees that the "Maturity Date" under (and as
defined in) the Cadmus->ELXSI Note is hereby extended by two years, to June ___,
2001. The foregoing shall for all purposes be effective as an amendment of the
Cadmus->ELXSI Note. Accordingly, in the event that ELXSI wishes to assign or
otherwise transfer the Cadmus->ELXSI Note to any third party, ELXSI shall advise
such third party of such amendment, and/or take such other reasonable actions,
as may be reasonably necessary, in order to render such amendment binding and
effective on such third party.

     2.  FURTHER ASSURANCES. From time to time after the date hereof, as and
when requested by either party hereto, the other party hereto shall execute and
deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, such documents and instruments
and shall take, or cause to be taken, such further or other actions as such
requesting party may reasonably deem necessary or desirable in order to further
effect or evidence the transactions contemplated hereby or to otherwise carry
out the intent and purposes of this agreement.

     3.  GOVERNING LAW. This agreement shall be interpreted, construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

     Kindly indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by executing a counterpart
of this letter in the space provided, whereupon it shall become a binding
agreement between us.

                                      Very truly yours,

                                      ELXSI


                                      By:/s/ DAVID M. DOOLITTLE
                                         ----------------------
                                         David M. Doolittle
                                         Vice President


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO,
as of the date first above written:

CADMUS CORPORATION


By:/s/ ALEXANDER M. MILLEY
   -----------------------
   Alexander M. Milley
   President
2129.302 Application of State and local taxes to the Government. ( a ) 5 U.S.C. 8714(c)(1) prohibits the imposition of taxes, fees, or other monetary payment on FEGLI Program premiums by any State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any political subdivision or governmental authority of those entities.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section shall not be construed to exempt the contractor from the imposition, payment, or collection of a tax, fee, or other monetary payment on the net income or profit accruing to or realized by it from business conducted under the FEGLI Program if the tax, fee, or payment is applicable to a broad range of business activity.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good
standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for
by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number: 1:12-cv-5546

MICHAEL LASALVIA, Plaintiff
Vv.
RUSSELL WASENDORF SR, RUSSELL WASENDORF JR.,
BRENDA CUYPERS and SUSAN MARY O'MEARA,
Defendants

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

MICHAEL EIDELMAN, AS TEMPORARY RECEIVER FOR RUSSELL WASENDORF
SR.

NAME (Type or print)
Randall M. Lending

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)
s/ Randall M. Lending

FIRM.
Vedder Price P.C.

STREET ADDRESS
222 N. LaSalle Street

CITY/STATE/ZIP
Chicago, Illinois 60601

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

6198407 312-609-7500

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? yes[¥| no[__|
ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? yes[_ | no[¥]
ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT'S TRIAL BAR? ves[¥] no[__ |

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES

no[_]

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL[_] APPOINTED counsEL |__|
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 Exhibit 10.1.25

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$1,000,000.00                                              Saint Paul, Minnesota
                                                                    July 1, 1999


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, I hereby promise to pay to Green Tree Financial
Corporation ("Green Tree"), a Delaware corporation, the sum of One Million and
00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00). The unpaid principal amount of this note,
together with interest thereon at the rate of 7% per annum, shall be due and
payable upon the earlier of (i) June 30, 2000; and (ii) the date of the
undersigned's voluntary termination of employment with Green Tree.

     Payments made hereunder shall be made at 1100 Landmark Towers, Saint Paul,
Minnesota. This note, together with accrual interest, may be paid in full or in
part at any time without premium or penalty.



                                                     /s/ Bruce A. Crittenden
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Bruce A. Crittenden
                                                     10 Lake Court
                                                     North Oaks, Minnesota 55127
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 23, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1551

Lower Tribunal No. 14-11093

________________

Rosaida Cuellar and Evelio Carmona,

Appellants,

vs.

Federal National Mortgage Association,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Vivianne Del 

Rio, Judge.

Rosaida Cuellar, in proper person.

Atlas | Solomon PLLC, and Adam G. Schwartz (Stuart); McGlinchey 

Stafford, and William L. Grimsley (Jacksonville), for appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM. 
2

Affirmed. See Handel v. Nevel, 147 So. 3d 649, 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2014) (“We review a trial court's ruling on a rule 1.540(b) motion to vacate 

for an abuse of discretion, and we will not disturb that ruling unless no 

reasonable judge would have reached the same decision”) (internal citation 

omitted); Lopez v. Wilmington Tr., N.A., 302 So. 3d 953, 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2020) (“Any matter asserted in [appellants’] rule 1.540(b) motion that was 

before the trial court prior to the entry of the amended final judgment of 

foreclosure is improperly raised in a rule 1.540(b) motion. A rule 1.540(b) 

motion cannot be utilized ‘to overcome [a party's] failure to timely challenge 

the original final judgment.’ Baez v. Perez, 201 So. 3d 692, 694 (Fla. 4th 

DCA 2016) (quoting Beal Bank, S.S.B., Inc. v. Sherwin, 829 So. 2d 961, 962 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2002))”).