alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of William F. Cody, Deceased. Violet H. Cody, Appellant; Helen McPhelin, Respondent.

In a contested probate proceeding, the contestant, the testator’s widow, appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, entered June 28, 1961 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict directed by the court in proponent’s favor on all the framed issues, which *inter alla*admitted the will to probate. The contestant, by her brief, has limited the issues on this appeal to testamentary capacity only; the proponent-executrix has not appeared. Decree reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to the contestant payable out of the estate; and new trial ordered limited to the issue of testator’s testamentary capacity. Pursuant to statute (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 309), this court directs the entry and recording of the jury’s verdict upon such issues as have not been ordered retried. On this record, we believe that a question of fact was presented as to the issue of testamentary capacity. Hence, as to such issue the verdict should not have been directed by the court; that issue should have been submitted to the jury. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 234.003 Responsibilities.

DoDD 5000.01, The Defense Acquisition System, and DoDI 5000.02, Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework, contain the DoD implementation of OMB Circular A-109 and OMB Circular A-11.

[70 FR 14575, Mar. 23, 2005, as amended at 76 FR 76320, Dec. 7, 2011; 88 FR 80466, Nov. 17, 2023]
# Part C
#### 2932.703-70 Contract clause.

Contracting officers shall insert the clause at DOLAR 2952.232-70, Limitation of Government's Obligation (LoGO), in all solicitations and contracts for severable services.
#### Harold Lewis, Respondent, v. Gloria Lewis, Appellant.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with $10 motion costs.
#### 26.101 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Indian* means any person who is a member of any Indian tribe, band, group, pueblo, or community that is recognized by the Federal Government as eligible for services from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1452(c) and any “Native” as defined in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601).

*Indian organization* means the governing body of any Indian tribe or entity established or recognized by the governing body of an Indian tribe for the purposes of 25 U.S.C., chapter 17.

*Indian-owned economic enterprise* means any Indian-owned (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior) commercial, industrial, or business activity established or organized for the purpose of profit, provided that Indian ownership constitutes not less than 51 percent of the enterprise.

*Indian tribe* means any Indian tribe, band, group, pueblo, or community, including native villages and native groups (including corporations organized by Kenai, Juneau, Sitka, and Kodiak) as defined in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, that is recognized by the Federal Government as eligible for services from BIA in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1452(c).

*Interested party* means a prime contractor or an actual or prospective offeror whose direct economic interest would be affected by the award of a subcontract or by the failure to award a subcontract.

[56 FR 41737, Aug. 22, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 39210, July 26, 1996; 65 FR 24323, Apr. 25, 2000]
V'^.w u„,-;Wi>' 

BUZZ TARVER, Agent 

Auto-Life-Health-Home and Business 

1121 S.Florida Avenue 

Lakeland, FL. 33803 

Phone: (863) 683-5553 www.BuzzTarver.com 

Fax; (863) 687-0271 Toll Free: (888) 683-5553 

Monday, August 02,2010 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

RoomW12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Gentlemen: 

E-mail: Buzz@Buz2Tarver.e0m 

• ' -

-, 

•-.- . 

CO 

• "' —-~_ 

V : 

m 

13 

•: r.v.;; 

- ^--o 

n 

Q 

.R^: FAA-2004-19881 

Exemption No.; 8465B from 14 CFI^ (FAR Section)-91.109(a 

Pkase extend tWseXiitn^gtiK^ ^'^ "i ^i-:<..o. 1,1 ^ 

i 

Edwafd J Tarver, III 

51^LakeInthe:Wo6a^ 

Lakeland, FL 33813 . 

2761396CFI. :': 

>. v'-** ;t-• 

•:;.^ ^ '• ) 

Buzz Tarver 

CHARTERED LIFE UNDERWRirER (CLU) 

CHARTERED PRCTERTY CASUALTY UNDERWRITER (CPCU) 

STATE FARM AGENT SINCE 1974
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 8

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
     relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect 
                               elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2017

   Mr. Udall (for himself, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
    Tester, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Brown, Ms. 
   Cantwell, Mr. Carper, Mr. Casey, Mr. Coons, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. 
  Franken, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Hirono, Mr. 
  King, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Markey, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Menendez, Mr. 
 Murphy, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Peters, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Shaheen, 
 Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Warren, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Wyden, 
 and Mr. Cardin) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
     relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect 
                               elections.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. To advance democratic self-government and political 
equality, and to protect the integrity of government and the electoral 
process, Congress and the States may regulate and set reasonable limits 
on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to 
influence elections.
    ``Section 2. Congress and the States shall have power to implement 
and enforce this article by appropriate legislation, and may 
distinguish between natural persons and corporations or other 
artificial entities created by law, including by prohibiting such 
entities from spending money to influence elections.
    ``Section 3. Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant 
Congress or the States the power to abridge the freedom of the 
press.''.
                                 <all>
```
2809.404 System for Award Management Exclusions. ( a ) The SDO shall ensure the discharge of all agency responsibilities prescribed in FAR 9.404(c)(1) through (6), (8), and (9).
( b ) The authority to establish procedures prescribed in FAR 9.404(c)(7) is delegated to the HCA, or designee.
----

**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                December 7, 2007 | **/S/                DORRIT J. BERN**                |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Dorrit                J. Bern                        |
|                                   | Chairman                of the Board                 |
|                                   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                                 |
| Dated:                December 7, 2007 | **/S/                ERIC M. SPECTER**               |
|                                   | Eric                M. Specter                       |
|                                   | Executive                Vice President              |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer               |

----
T: 516174 / 12110078 / 7/22/13 - 1 -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND )

SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 12-CV-3461

)

v. ) Judge Guzman

NORTHERN ILLINOIS TRANSIT, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

On May 6, 2013, the Court entered final judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and 

against Defendants Northern Illinois Transit, Inc. in the amount of $113,794.74. The 

Court also awarded attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(D). 

Pursuant to Local Rule 54.3, the parties have consulted on the reasonableness of the 

attorneys’ fees and costs sought by Plaintiffs.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Court being fully advised in the premises HEREBY 

FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(D), attorneys’ fees in the amount of 

$24,622.75 for 125.90 hours of work performed by attorneys of record and their 

paralegals are found to be reasonable in amount and based upon reasonable rates of 

billing.

2. Costs are reasonable, and are therefore awarded in the amount of $689.95.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Case: 1:12-cv-03461 Document #: 54 Filed: 07/22/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:905
T: 516174 / 12110078 / 7/22/13 - 2 -

A. Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs is granted.

B. Pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 29 U.S.C. 

§1132(g)(2), Plaintiffs shall have and recover from Defendants in attorneys’ fees in the 

amount of $24,622.75, costs in the amount of $689.95, totaling $25,312.70

C. That Plaintiffs are awarded post-judgment interest on the entire judgment 

balance at an annualized interest rate equal to two percent (2%) plus the prime interest 

rate established by JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA for the fifteenth (15th) day of the month 

for which interest is charged and with said interest to be compounded annually.

C. Plaintiffs are awarded execution for the collection of the judgment and 

costs granted.

Enter:

Dated: July 22, 2013 _________________________________

United States District Judge

Case: 1:12-cv-03461 Document #: 54 Filed: 07/22/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:906
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7695

WILLIAM PARKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden, Federal Correctional

Institution, Morgantown,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-144-1)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Parker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing

without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)

petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Parker v. Bledsoe, No.

CA-98-144-1 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 09/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.11 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
exv10w2






EXHIBIT 10.2




TERMINATION AMENDMENT TO THE

LITTELFUSE, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN




     This Termination Amendment to the Littelfuse, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the
“SERP”) is made by Littelfuse, Inc. (the “Employer”), effective December 31, 2009:



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Employer maintains the SERP;



     WHEREAS, the Employer’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) previously approved, on April 24,
2009, the amendment of the SERP to freeze benefit accruals for the 2009 calendar year (“Prior
Suspension”); and



     WHEREAS, the Board has separately authorized the Chief Executive Officer of the Employer to
determine on behalf of the Board, in his sole discretion, whether to permanently freeze the SERP
effective January 1, 2010 or terminate the SERP effective on or before January 1, 2010, and to
amend the SERP to change the interest rate;



AMENDMENT & TERMINATION




     NOW THEREFORE, the SERP is hereby amended and terminated, effective December 31, 2009, as
follows:



     1. The SERP is terminated, effective December 31, 2009 (“Termination Date”).



     2. All Participant accounts shall be fully vested as of the Termination Date, as required by
Section 5.2 of the SERP.



     3. Participants’ benefits and credits suspended for the 2009 Plan Year under the First
Amendment to the SERP are hereby reinstated.



     4. Section 3.5(b) of the SERP shall be amended to add the following sentence: “Notwithstanding
the foregoing, interest credited to accounts on or after January 1, 2010 and prior to benefit
commencement, shall be equal to the 5-year Treasury constant maturity rate.”



     5. Section 3.5 of the SERP shall be amended to correct the scrivener’s error in paragraph (e)
so that the Section referenced therein is Section 3.8(b)(iii).



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Termination Amendment is hereby approved on
                                        , 2009, pursuant to authority granted by the Board on July 27, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Littelfuse, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Gordon Hunter, Chief Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134498 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134498 COA: 273971 Chippewa CC: 98-006681-FH DARRIN SCOTT LAPINE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01726]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16850 and #16851; COLORADO Disaster Number CO-
00131]

Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Colorado

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Colorado (FEMA-
4581-DR), dated 01/15/2021.
    Incident: Wildfires.
    Incident Period: 09/06/2020 through 11/05/2020.

DATES: Issued on 01/15/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/16/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/15/2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 01/15/2021, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Grand, Larimer

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.750
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.750
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.750
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 16850 5 
and for economic injury is 16851 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Cynthia Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-01726 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 11, 2020

s0909 

# Order

Clerk September 11, 2020

161557

In re A. SMITH, JR., Minor. SC: 161557

COA: 351233

Huron CC Family Division:

17

- 004605

- NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Fifth Third Mortgage Company v.

Ira Kaufman et al.

12:cv-04693

Ira T. Kaufman P.C.

Arthur C. Czaja

Law Offices of Arthur C. Czaja

7521 N. Milwaukee Ave.

Niles, IL 60714

6291494 847-647-2106

arthur@czajalawoffices.com

January 21, 2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Arthur C. Czaja
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 355 

Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations in the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. LANKFORD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations 

in the Senate. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF NOMINATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

4 (1) POST-CLOTURE CONSIDERATION.—If cloture 

5 is invoked in accordance with rule XXII of the 

6 Standing Rules of the Senate on a nomination de7 scribed in paragraph (2), there shall be no more 

8 than 8 hours of post-cloture consideration equally di9 vided in the usual form. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 355 IS 

1 (2) NOMINATIONS COVERED.—A nomination 

2 described in this paragraph is any nomination except 

3 for the nomination of an individual— 

4 (A) to a position at level I of the Executive 

5 Schedule under section 5312 of title 5, United 

6 States Code; or 

7 (B) to serve as a judge or justice ap8 pointed to hold office during good behavior. 

9 (b) SPECIAL RULE FOR DISTRICT COURT NOMI10 NEES.—If cloture is invoked in accordance with rule XXII 

11 of the Standing Rules of the Senate on a nomination of 

12 an individual to serve as a judge of a district court of the 

13 United States, there shall be no more than 2 hours of 

14 post-cloture consideration equally divided in the usual 

15 form. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with thefiling of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007(the “Report”) by Aspyra, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifiesthat to his knowledge:

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: March 31, 2008
| /s/ James Zierick                              |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| James Zierick, Interim Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aspyra, Inc. andwill be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----