alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
');
	document.write('

**Program Office:**Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education

**CFDA Numbers:**  84.116R**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants**Also Known As:** PPCETUCC

## Program Description

The PPCETUCC program is designed program to support technology upgrades for  community colleges for the purpose of supporting cybersecurity programs.The efforts of the nation’s community  colleges to expand cybersecurity education in lower-income student populations  are commendable and important, but often those schools lack the resources to  maintain state of the art programs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,140,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,139,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,279,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,279,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,187,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,361,993
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,730,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,279,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               846,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,927,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             709,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,790,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (488,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,302,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,302,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.96)
Exhibit 10.28





EXTENSION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





This Extension of Employment Agreement (this
Agreement) effective as of March 27, 2002, by and between CARROLS CORPORATION (Employer), a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware having an address at 968 James Street, Syracuse, New York 13203 and DANIEL T.
ACCORDINO whose principal residence is 5175 East Lake Road, Cazenovia, New York 13035 (Employee).





|1. |  | Employer and Employee previously entered into a certain employment agreement dated January 1, 1995, as amended April 3, 1996, and as further amended and
restated on March 27, 1997 (the Employment Agreement), which agreement expired on March 27, 2002.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | Employer and Employee have agreed to extend the term of the Employment Agreement to September 30, 2004.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|3. |  | The Carrols Corporation Compensation Committee has approved the extension of the Employment Agreement as herein provided.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|4. |  | By this Agreement, the Employment Agreement is extended effective as of March 27, 2002, through September 30, 2004, upon all terms and conditions set forth in
the Employment Agreement.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|5. |  | The following sentence is added to the end of Section 6(c) of the Employment Agreement:
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Anything to the contrary set forth in the Carrols Holdings Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the nonqualified stock option agreements related thereto
and the Unvested Stock Option Agreement, issued to Employee on March 27, 1997 notwithstanding, in the event of termination of employment due to Employees death or disability (as defined in Section 11(f) below), or for good Reason
or without Cause (as defined in Section 1), the Employee or his transferee shall not be required to exercise any such outstanding stock options until the expiration of the terms of such stock options; provided, however, that nothing contained
in this Section 6(c)shall affect the terms and provisions of Section 5 of any of the stock option agreements, as may be amended, which terms and provisions shall remain in full force and effect.





IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and have caused this Extension of Employment Agreement to be executed on April 1,
2002.





CARROLS CORPORATION/s/    Joseph A. ZirkmanName: Joseph A. Zirkman Title: Vice President/s/    Daniel T. AccordinoDaniel T. Accordino
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 151 

Commending the Northwest Missouri State University Bearcats on their National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II national championship 

victories. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2017 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Northwest Missouri State University 

Bearcats on their National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II national championship victories. 

Whereas, on December 17, 2016, the Northwest Missouri 

State University football team defeated the University of 

North Alabama by a score of 29 to 3 in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble 

as the ‘‘NCAA’’) Division II national championship game 

in Kansas City, Kansas; 

Whereas the victory was the sixth Division II national championship for Northwest Missouri State University since 

1996 and the fourth since 2006; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 151 ATS 

Whereas the Bearcats have won 55 games and lost 2 games 

over the past 4 seasons, with 30 straight victories over 

the last 2 years; 

Whereas former head coach Adam Dorrel is 1 of just 3 head 

coaches in Division II football to win 3 national titles, 

and athletic director Mel Tjeerdsma has the distinction of 

being 1 of the other coaches to accomplish that feat; 

Whereas, on March 25, 2017, the Northwest Missouri State 

men’s basketball team defeated Fairmont State University in the NCAA Division II national championship, a 

first in the history of the Bearcats basketball program; 

Whereas the Bearcats men’s basketball team finished the 

2016–2017 season with a 29-1 record, earning coach Ben 

McCollum his third Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics 

Association Coach of the Year award; 

Whereas Bearcat guard, Justin Pitts, was named— 

(1) Division II Player of the Year by the National 

Association of Basketball Coaches; and 

(2) Division II Bulletin Player of the Year; and 

Whereas Northwest Missouri State University became the 

first Division II school to win championships for football 

and men’s basketball in the same academic year: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends Northwest Missouri State Uni3 versity for their Division II national championship 

4 victories in football and men’s basketball; 

5 (2) recognizes the athletic prowess, hard work, 

6 and dedication exhibited by the players, coaches, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 151 ATS 

1 support staff, and student body of Northwest Mis2 souri State University; and 

3 (3) congratulates the city of Maryville, Mis4 souri, and Bearcat fans and alumni around the 

5 world. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE May 13, 2015

Washington, DC 20590

Regarding: Amendment to Alaska Aerial Services’ Exemption No. 12668 in Regulatory Docket FAA-2015-

1202 to include additional aircraft as follows.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Alaska Aerial Services was issued a Section 333 exemption for operation in the national airspace. Alaska 

Aerial Services hereby requests an amendment to that exemption to allow additional Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems (UAS) with no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and 

safety that were the basis for the FAA granting the original exemption. All requested aircraft below have 

been previously approved for use under Section 333 exemptions.

Alaska Aerial Services wishes to operate the following additional UAS:

Aircraft Previously Approved 

Under Exemption

3DR Solo 11309A

3DR Iris+ 11309A

DJI Phantom 2 11309A

DJI Phantom 3 11309A

DJI Inspire 11172A

Skywalker X8 11172A

ZETA Science FX-79 11492A

As this is an amendment to existing exemptions requesting only the addition of other types of

UAS, Alaska Aerial Services respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to 

be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

3875 Geist Road, Suite E #210 

Fairbanks, AK 99709

Sincerely,

Carl France

Chief Pilot

Carl@AlaskaAerialServices.com
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mariano Diaz-Rosa, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: During the course of the trial a statement claimed to have been a confession of the defendant was received in evidence. Part of this statement had been deleted at the time it was made and before it was signed by defendant. The District Attorney did not contend that the defendant had admitted or confessed to the deleted part, and when the statement was read to the jury that part was omitted. Nevertheless, at the conclusion of the case and during deliberation the jury asked to see the exhibits. Defendant’s counsel objected but, through inadvertence, the Judge permitted the exhibits, including the so-called confession, to go to the jury over such objection. The deletion was attempted by merely drawing a line across the language in such a fashion it could easily be read. The language in question is: “During a search of my room in barracks No. 448 on 3 Jun 63, Mr. GO S SIN found in the wastepaper basket in my room a partially smoked cigarett. This cigarette is a marijuana cigarett that I had forgotten that I had put in the wastepaper basket. The reason that the reason [sic] is partially smoked is because I used to let possible customers take a puff to try them out.” Thus the jury received, and may well have considered, a so-called confession that the defendant had not made. The content was vital, because it was at variance with the contentions of the defendant through his counsel during the trial, and it was highly prejudicial in any event. The charge was selling marijuana cigarettes, and there could be nothing much more harmful before a jury in such a case than a statement that the defendant “used to let possible customers take a puff to try them out”. There was nothing in the charge relating to the deleted portion. The jury was not told, of course, that it should be disregarded, and naturally so because it was not in evidence. We may not say that the jury, of its own volition, disregarded this part of the statement simply because it appears to have been crossed out, because the jury had not been so instructed. The deleted, but easily readable, part of the statement may well have been the determining factor in inducing the verdict that was rendered. We may not speculate as to this. In any event, the defendant did not receive a fair trial and this case must be retried. Furthermore, in connection with this so-called confession, problems *756may be present under the procedural standards established in *Jackson*v. *Denno*(378 U. S. 368). Upon a new trial these matters may be considered and if the *Jackson-Denno*rule is applicable it may be followed. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court convicting defendant of violation of subdivision 1 of section 1751 of the Penal Law, a felony.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                               | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Vocational and Adult Education Home |
|                                               |

For further information, contact:

**Name:** Linda Mayo, Program Officer**E-mail Address:** linda.mayo@ed.gov**Mailing Address:**U.S. Department of Education, OVAE  Division of Academic and Technical EducationPotomac Center Plaza550 12th St. S.W., Rm. 11075Washington, D.C. 20202-7242**Telephone:** (202) 245-7792**Toll-free:** 1-800-USA-LEARN or 1-800-872-5327**Fax:** (202) 245-7170

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 2409.507-1 Solicitation provisions.

The Contracting Officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at 48 CFR 2452.209-70, Potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest, in all solicitations over the simplified acquisition limitation when the Contracting Officer has reason to believe that a potential organizational conflict of interest exists. The Contracting Officer shall describe the nature of the potential conflict in the provision.

[65 FR 3576, Jan. 21, 2000]
Functional Statements > Federal Student Aid

## A. Immediate Office of the Chief Operating Officer

The Office of the Chief Operating Officer is responsible for effective management of Federal Student Aid (FSA) as a Performance-Based Organization (PBO). The Chief Operating Officer (COO) manages operations and support functions to ensure that best-in-business performance is consistently delivered. The Immediate Office of the Chief Operating Officer includes COO- focused initiatives, such as organizational development, change management, executive services, and employee engagement.

Organizational development and change management are responsible for strategic preparation of the work force for organizational change within a dynamic culture requiring timely responsiveness. This includes, evaluation of the effectiveness of change in terms of outcomes, and its impact on overall organizational health.

This includes evaluation of the effectiveness of change in terms of outcomes on overall organizational health.

Executive Services consists of the COO Executive Support and the COO Action Liaison.  Executive Services is responsible for effective management of COO and Principal Deputy COO executive support functions to ensure that best in business performance is consistently delivered.  COO Executive Support manages the COO’s calendar, provides pre-meeting briefs and reading material, post meeting briefs, logistic support, travel accommodations, communications support, executive visitation arrangements, document processing and archiving, COO office support.

Employee Engagement is responsible for development and implementation of strategies to facilitate employee engagement, the promotion of cultural change, the management of internal employee communications and initiatives, and the improvement of employee morale. Employee engagement provides enterprise-wide support by serving as advisor to the COO as well as managing the distribution of the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS), soliciting information from employees, through focus groups or other methods of obtaining employee input regarding engagement, managing employee engagement-related communications and publications, and reviewing practices at other agencies where improvements have been made in employee engagement to determine what works, while recognizing that each agency’s culture and circumstances are unique.
#### Grant A. Roe, Appellant, v. Franklin A. Schriver, Respondent.

Motion to consolidate appeals and to extend time to perfect the appeals granted. The appellant is to perfect the consolidated appeals and be ready to argue or submit them at the January 1961 Term. The appeals are ordered on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 23 (Friday, February 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11347]


Proposal To Extend and Amend Cultural Property Agreement Between 
the United States and Egypt

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Proposal to extend and amend the Memorandum of Understanding 
Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Categories of 
Archaeological Material of the Arab Republic of Egypt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Foster, Cultural Heritage 
Center, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs: 202-632-6301; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bf8eef7ebe9f4ebdbe8effaeffeb5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2340564f53514c536350574257460d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>; include ``Egypt'' in the subject line.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and 
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension and amendment of the 
Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Imposition of Import 
Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological Material of the Arab 
Republic of Egypt is hereby proposed.
    A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Designated List of 
categories of material restricted from import into the United States, 
and related information can be found at the Cultural Heritage Center 
website: http://culturalheritage.state.gov.

Allison R. Davis,
Executive Director CPAC, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-02369 Filed 2-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
               UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Cybrdi Inc.
("We") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xue Bu, the
principal financial officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of us

DATE: December 22, 2008                 By: /s/ Xue Bu
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Xue Bu, Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALA
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIF
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      481
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,301
<PP&E>                                          56,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,107
<BONDS>                                         32,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,759
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,085
<SALES>                                          6,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,321
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    366
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                366
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       366
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>