alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 57 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance 
                with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal Credit 
Opportunity Act'' (CFPB Bulletin 2013-02 (March 21, 2013), and printed 
in the Congressional Record on December 6, 2017, on pages S7888-S7889, 
along with a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability 
Office dated December 5, 2017, that the Bulletin is a rule under the 
Congressional Review Act), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate April 18, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance 
                with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act''.
```
#### 216.405 Cost-reimbursement incentive contracts.
#### 28.204-1 United States bonds or notes.

Any person required to furnish a bond to the Government has the option, instead of furnishing a surety or sureties on the bond, of depositing certain United States bonds or notes in an amount equal at their par value to the penal sum of the bond (the Act of February 24, 1919 (31 U.S.C. 9303) and Treasury Department Circular No. 154 (31 CFR part 225)). In addition, a duly executed power of attorney and agreement authorizing the collection or sale of such United States bonds or notes in the event of default of the principal on the bond shall accompany the deposited bonds or notes. The contracting officer may (a) turn securities over to the finance or other authorized agency official, or (b) deposit them with the Treasurer of the United States, a Federal Reserve Bank (or branch with requisite facilities), or other depository designated for that purpose by the Secretary of the Treasury, under procedures prescribed by the agency concerned and Treasury Department Circular No. 154 (exception: The contracting officer shall deposit all bonds and notes received in the District of Columbia with the Treasurer of the United States).

[48 FR 42286, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 54 FR 48986, 48989, Nov. 28, 1989; 86 FR 3686, Jan. 14, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          14,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                       750
<INVENTORY>                                     26,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,411
<PP&E>                                         142,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,054
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,024
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,290
<SALES>                                        166,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,685
<CGS>                                          108,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,550
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,090
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

July 13, 2020 

Honorable Carolyn Stanford Taylor 

State Superintendent 

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 

P.O. Box 7841 

Madison, Wisconsin 53707 

Carolyn.StanfordTaylor@dpi.wi.gov 

Dear Superintendent Stanford Taylor: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant award H027A180064 and H173A180070. 

The Department received your June 11, 2020 request on behalf of the Wisconsin Department of

Public Instruction for a waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 

2018 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs State Lead, Bryan Grigg, at 

Bryan.Grigg@ed.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration.

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services.

cc: State Director 

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600 

www.ed.gov 

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness 

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of YDI Wireless,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick L.
Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the Company certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald                /s/ Patrick L. Milton
----------------------------------      -------------------------------------
Robert E. Fitzgerald                    Patrick L. Milton
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: March 25, 2004                   Date: March 25, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroTelesis,  Inc.  formerly known as
Pacific  Realm,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  December 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that to the  best of his
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ Joseph Gutierrez
Joseph Gutierrez, President, Chief Financial Officer
Dated: February 19, 2004
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of International Lease Finance Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual    report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this annual report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual    report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that    has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially    affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial    reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal controls over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: March 16, 2006     /s/  Steven F.    Udvar-Hazy        Steven F. Udvar-Hazy*Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jerry Jerome ROCHKIND, Appellant.

No. 81-5003.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Jan. 8, 1982.

Decided March 18, 1982.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1982.

*19Stephen N. Goldberg, Baltimore, Md., for appellant.

Barbara S. Sale, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baltimore, Md. (J. Frederick Motz, U. S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Before INGRAHAM *, Senior Circuit Judge, and WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Joe M. Ingraham, Senior Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Rochkind appeals his conviction on two counts of receiving goods which had been stolen from interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. We affirm.

In December, 1977, a tractor-trailer carrying china bound from Ohio to New Jersey was stolen while stopped in Baltimore, Maryland. The stolen china was stored in Page Van & Storage, Rochkind’s employer, which company was owned by Rochkind’s wife. Rochkind sold some of the china so stored to an undercover state police officer. Later that month another tractor-trailer of china was similarly stolen, and stored, and Rochkind attempted a sale thereof which was not completed.

Rochkind claims several grounds for reversal, the principal being that the district court erred in not allowing him to show that the china itself was traveling in violation of federal law. He claims that the carrier had not complied with the Interstate Commerce Commission’s licensing requirements thus affecting the district court’s jurisdiction. The district court held the question of whether the carrier was properly licensed by the ICC to be irrelevant. We agree. The statute Rochkind is charged under deals with goods in interstate commerce. The china here was clearly in interstate commerce, and the carrier’s status with respect to its license is not relevant. *Nassif v. U.*S., 370 F.2d 147 (8th Cir. 1966).

We have examined the remainder of Rochkind’s contentions and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is

AFFIRMED.
- Name:
      - **Jennifer Coffey**
      - E-mail Address:
      - jennifer.coffey@ed.gov
      - Mailing Address:
      - U.S. Department of Education, OSERSOffice of Special Education Programs550 12th St., SW, PCP-5161Washington, DC 20202
      - Telephone:
      - 202-245-6673
# C_2017216EN.01000301.xml

| 6.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 July 2017

(2017/C 216/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1329 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87735 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6243 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0950 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4965 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,109 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,16 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2463 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5881 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0611 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4916 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4682 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8442 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5575 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5672 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 307,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1267 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7060 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4143 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 159,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8697 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,419 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,8200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,570 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7545 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7053 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,4075 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1329

JPY

Japanese yen

128,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87735

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6243

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0950

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4965

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,109

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,16

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2463

RON

Romanian leu

4,5881

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0611

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4916

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4682

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8442

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5575

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5672

KRW

South Korean won

1 307,79

ZAR

South African rand

15,1267

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7060

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4143

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 159,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8697

PHP

Philippine peso

57,419

RUB

Russian rouble

67,8200

THB

Thai baht

38,570

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7545

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7053

INR

Indian rupee

73,4075

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 3005.402 General public.

Requests for other specific records information shall be processed according to the DHS Freedom of Information Act rules and regulations (HSAR) 48 CFR 3024.203.
UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.



Exhibit 32 (b)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-KSB of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003, I, Lisa M. Porter, Chief Financial
Officer of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



(1) such Form 10-KSB, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in such Form
10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Lisa M. Porter     
|Lisa M. Porter         
|Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2012

RE: Docket No. DOT - OST - 2012 - 0029 Dear Secretary LaHood: I am writing in support of the application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. to provide a daily direct flight to Reagan National Airport (DCA) from Portland International Airport (PDX). I bel ieve that Alaska is the right choice. With their large Portland hub presence, strong customer service focus and track record for operational reliability, the carrier is best suited to provide a nonstop PDX to DCA flight. Portland is the second largest market to the Washington DC area without nonstop service to DCA. With a nonstop route from PDX to DCA, Oregon and S.W. Washington residents will no longer be forced to use more time - consuming and less convenient service to our nation's capital. I respectfully urge you to grant Alaska Airlines' application to serve PDX - DCA.

Linda L Brooks Pacific City, Oregon deaclin@gmail.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         238,000                  23,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  814,000                  23,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,173,000                 735,000
<PP&E>                                      45,497,000              38,251,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,000                  39,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,355,000              41,303,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,389,000               3,676,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,288,000               5,200,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,551,000              22,851,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,355,000              41,303,000
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               395,000                 250,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (768,000)               (438,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,131,000)               (347,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (889,000)                (54,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,393,000)               (589,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,393,000)               (589,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,393,000)               (589,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.53)                  (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.53)                  (0.69)





</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 129

           Designating April 2017 as ``Second Chance Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2017

Mr. Portman (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Durbin) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Designating April 2017 as ``Second Chance Month''.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates April 2017 as ``Second Chance Month'';
            (2) honors the work of communities, governmental entities, 
        nonprofit organizations, congregations, employers, and 
        individuals to remove unnecessary legal and societal barriers 
        that prevent an individual with a criminal record from becoming 
        a productive member of society; and
            (3) calls on the people of the United States to observe 
        Second Chance Month through actions and programs that--
                    (A) promote awareness of collateral consequences; 
                and
                    (B) provide closure for individuals who have paid 
                their debts.
                                 <all>
```