alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12** **INTERNATIONAL    LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES** **COMPUTATION    OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES****AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS****(Unaudited)**                        **Years Ended December 31,**   **2007**  **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003**   **(Dollars in thousands)**      Earnings                        Net income     $    604,366      $    499,267      $    438,349      $    462,006      $    435,481     Add:                        Provision for income taxes(a)      310,519       216,840       235,834       206,101       196,683     Fixed charges      1,653,288       1,520,777       1,221,671       989,314       981,306     Less:                        Capitalized interest      (37,192    )      (48,038    )      (54,097    )      (48,390    )      (49,679    )                         Earnings as adjusted (A)     $    2,530,981      $    2,188,846      $    1,841,757      $    1,609,031      $    1,563,791                          Preferred dividend requirements     $    5,346      $    5,421      $    4,650      $    3,826      $    3,891     Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income      151    %      143    %      154    %      145    %      145    %                         Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis      8,072       7,752       7,161       5,548       5,642                          Fixed charges                        Interest expense      1,612,886       1,469,650       1,164,432       936,517       919,961     Capitalized interest      37,192       48,038       54,097       48,390       49,679     Interest factor of rents      3,210       3,089       3,142       4,407       11,666                          Fixed charges as adjusted (B)      1,653,288       1,520,777       1,221,671       989,314       981,306                          Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)      1,661,360       1,528,529       1,228,832      $    994,862      $    986,948                          Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ((A) divided by (B))      1.53x       1.44x       1.51x       1.63x       1.59x                          Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends    ((A) divided by (C))      1.52x       1.43x       1.50x       1.62x       1.58x                           (a)     2003 include income taxes related to cumulative effect of    accounting change.
EXHIBIT
32(a)





PHARMOS
CORPORATION


SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In
connection with the annual report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, ROBERT F.
JOHNSTON, Executive Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.





Date:
February 22, 2010





By:
      /s/ Robert F. Johnston











In
connection with the annual report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, S. COLIN NEILL,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.





Date:
February 22, 2010





By:
      /s/ S. Colin Neill








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by
Pharmos Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# C_2017016EN.01000201.xml

| 18.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 January 2017

(2017/C 16/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0684 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4364 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86790 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5033 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0712 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,79 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3693 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5010 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0560 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4162 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3953 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2860 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4877 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5168 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 248,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,3969 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3235 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5325 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 240,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7677 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,234 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,2426 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,731 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4305 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,0550 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,6335 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0684

JPY

Japanese yen

121,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4364

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86790

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5033

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0712

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,79

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3693

RON

Romanian leu

4,5010

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0560

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4162

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3953

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2860

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4877

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5168

KRW

South Korean won

1 248,81

ZAR

South African rand

14,3969

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3235

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5325

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 240,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7677

PHP

Philippine peso

53,234

RUB

Russian rouble

63,2426

THB

Thai baht

37,731

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4305

MXN

Mexican peso

23,0550

INR

Indian rupee

72,6335

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 989 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 

of pediatric subspecialists in the National Health Service Corps program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2017 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the participation of pediatric subspecialists in the National Health Service Corps program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Children’s 

5 Access to Specialty Care Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 989 IS

1 SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF PEDIATRIC SUBSPECIALTIES IN 

2 NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS. 

3 (a) PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES DEFINITION.—Sec4 tion 331(a)(3)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(and pe6 diatric subspecialties and special qualifications in pediat7 rics)’’ after ‘‘pediatrics’’. 

8 (b) BEHAVIORAL AND MENTAL HEALTH PROFES9 SIONALS DEFINITION.—Section 331(a)(3)(E)(i) of the 

10 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254d(a)(3)(E)(i)) 

11 is amended by inserting ‘‘(including pediatric subspecial12 ists thereof)’’ after ‘‘psychiatrists’’. 

13 (c) HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREAS.— 

14 Section 332(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

15 U.S.C. 254e(a)) is amended— 

16 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting ‘‘(includ17 ing such a population group of children and adoles18 cents)’’ after ‘‘shortage’’; and 

19 (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting ‘‘pediatric 

20 subspecialty medical residency or fellowship training 

21 site,’’ after ‘‘health department,’’. 

22 (d) LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.—Subparagraph 

23 (B) of section 338B(b)(1) of the Public Health Service 

24 Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1(b)(1)) is amended by inserting 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 989 IS

1 ‘‘(including a pediatric subspecialty residency or fellowship 

2 training program)’’ before the semicolon. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
235.006-70 Manufacturing Technology Program. In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 4841(d) and 4872, for acquisitions under the Manufacturing Technology Program— ( a ) Award all contracts using competitive procedures; and
( b ) Include in all solicitations an evaluation factor that addresses the extent to which offerors propose to share in the cost of the project (see FAR 15.304).
[65 FR 2058, Jan. 13, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 65092, Nov. 10, 2004; 87 FR 76995, Dec. 16, 2022]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TRAVIS WAGNER FOWLER, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 566 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 95 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 95

 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
           Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 11, 2017

Mr. Heller (for himself and Ms. Cortez Masto) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
           Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Waste Informed Consent 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the terms ``affected Indian tribe'', ``affected unit 
of local government'', ``Commission'', ``high-level radioactive 
waste'', ``repository'', ``spent nuclear fuel'', and ``unit of general 
local government'' have the meanings given the terms in section 2 of 
the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101).

SEC. 3. CONSENT BASED APPROVAL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not make an expenditure from the 
Nuclear Waste Fund for the costs of the activities described in 
paragraphs (4) and (5) of section 302(d) of the Nuclear Waste Policy 
Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has entered into 
an agreement to host a repository with--
            (1) the Governor of the State in which the repository is 
        proposed to be located;
            (2) each affected unit of local government;
            (3) any unit of general local government contiguous to the 
        affected unit of local government if spent nuclear fuel or 
        high-level radioactive waste will be transported through that 
        unit of general local government for disposal at the 
        repository; and
            (4) each affected Indian tribe.
    (b) Conditions on Agreement.--Any agreement to host a repository 
under this Act--
            (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties;
            (2) shall be binding on the parties; and
            (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by mutual 
        agreement of the parties.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31(a)  CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  I, Haim Aviv, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pharmos Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/  HAIM AVIV

-------------------------

Haim Aviv

Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 21, 2006
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJuly 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael B. Jebsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: September 9, 2010

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### 236.275 Construction of industrial resources.

See Subpart 237.75 for policy relating to facilities projects.

[74 FR 37646, July 29, 2009]
Order entered November 18 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01 468
- CV
IN RE BABU SAMUEL KALLUVIL AYIL , Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . F91
- 00956
- TH 

### O RDER Before Justices Moseley, Lang

- Miers, and Evans Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY in part and DISMISS in part relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceedi ng. We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this Court’s opinion and order, by first

- class mail, to Babu Samuel Kalluvilayil, TDCJ No. 584945, Robertson Unit, 12071 F.M. 3522, Abilene, Texas 79601.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this Court’s opinion a nd order, by electronic transmission, to the Presiding Judge of the Criminal District Court No. 1 and to Michael Casillas, Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
## Legislation

- Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended; Strengthening Historically Black Colleges  and Universities; Title III, Part B, Section 326 ( 20 U.S.C. 1063B )

## Regulations

- 34 CFR Part 609
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR), Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

Institutional Service Home
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, Rodolfo L. Garcia

and Brandon C. Stroh v. Stephen B. Lee, M.D

. , P.A.

, a Texas

Professional Association , Dean Paul Ch auvin, Jr., M.D., P.A., a Texas Professional Association, and Michael Nguyen, M.D.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00467

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 12279

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Appellants have filed an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order denying their plea in abatement and motion to dismiss the underlying lawsuit in favor of arbitration. They have also filed a parallel mandamus proceeding, In re Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, Rodolfo L. Garcia, and Brandon C. Stroh , 01

- 14

- 00463

- CV. Appellants filed an Emergency Motion to Stay All Trial Court Proceedings Pending Appellate Review of Order Denying Arbitration in both this appeal and the mandamus proceeding. We granted the motion in the mandamus p ursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.10.

Appellees have now filed a response to the motion in both this appeal and the mandamus. After reviewing the motion to stay and the response, we GRANT the motion to stay filed in this appeal; all proceedi ngs in the trial court, including discovery, are STAYED pending further

order of this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 29.3.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 22, 2014
#### 246.270-1 Scope.

This section implements section 807 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84). It establishes policies and procedures intended to ensure the safety and habitability of facilities, infrastructure, and equipment acquired for use by DoD military or civilian personnel during military operations performed outside the United States, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

[75 FR 66685, Oct. 29, 2010]
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Kendall Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 3577 DATE 5/30/2012

CASE

TITLE

Annan vs. City of Romeoville et al

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Annan’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [4] is denied because his financial affidavit does not

set forth his inability to pay the mandated court fees.  Annan is free to pay the mandated filing fees

and present his Complaint to this Court again.

O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

Plaintiff Kenneth Annan moves to proceed in forma pauperis without the full prepayment of filing fees.

Annan brings a cause of action against the City of Romeoville, Romeoville Police Officer R.

Zamborowski,twoUnknownRomeoville PoliceOfficers, SteveTimmer, andSpotlessExpress alleging

violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments for false arrest, unlawful

detention, excessive force, deliberate indifference to the medical needs of a pretrial detainee, and

malicious prosecution.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court may authorize Annan to proceed in forma pauperis if he is

unable to pay the mandated court fees.  Annan need not be penniless to proceed in forma pauperis

under § 1915(a)(1).  See Zaun v. Dobbin, 628 F.2d 990, 992 (7th Cir. 1980).  Instead, he is eligible to

proceed in forma pauperis if payment of the filing fee will prevent him from providing for life’s

necessities.  See id.  According to his financial affidavit, Annan is currently unemployed and was last

employed from February 9, 2009 through July 7, 2010.  At that time Annan was employed by the City

Colleges of Chicago, earning $1,200 per month.  Annan is married, andhis financial affidavit states that

his wife has an income of $23,000 per month.  In the last twelve months, Annan has made professional

income in the amount of $4,200 .  His wife owns a car with a current value of $3,000, in which she has

$1,000 in equity.  Based on these facts, Annan’s financial affidavit does not set forth his inability to pay

the mandated court fees.

12C3577 Annan vs. City of Romeoville et al Page 1 of 2
STATEMENT

Annan’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperisis deniedbecause his financial affidavit does not setforth

his inability to pay the mandated court fees.  Annan is free to pay the mandated filing fees and present

his Complaint to this Court again.

12C3577 Annan vs. City of Romeoville et al Page 2 of 2