alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31(ii)****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Eric S. Nadeau, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Camco Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of Camco as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. Camco’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and15d 15(f))for Camco and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Camco, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of Camco’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluations; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in Camco’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Camco’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Camco’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.5. Camco’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Camco’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Camco’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: August 6, 2007 By:  /s/ Eric S. Nadeau    Eric S. Nadeau, Chief Financial Officer
#### 252.237-7001 Compliance with audit standards.

As prescribed in 237.270(e)(2), use the following clause:

# Compliance With Audit Standards (MAY 2000)

The Contractor, in performance of all audit services under this contract, shall comply with “Government Auditing Standards” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.

(End of clause)

[65 FR 32041, May 22, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 65501, Oct. 28, 2022]
#### In re SMITH. In the matter of Samuel B. Smith, as receiver, etc., of Count W. Weeks, and another.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
----- Original Message ----- From: Nathaniel Jutras Sent: 03/05/2010 05:38 PM EST To: Lori Stewart Cc: Chet France; Margo Oge; Robin Moran; Nicole Owens; Patricia Grim Subject: Re: RIA file Hi Lori,

Here is the confirmation of the upload to ROCIS.

Thanks, -Nate
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 975 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

Indian coal production tax credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2017 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. BARRASSO, and Mr. TESTER) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the Indian coal production tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INDIAN COAL PRO4 DUCTION TAX CREDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45(e)(10)(A) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘per 

7 ton of Indian coal—’’ and all that follows and inserting 

8 the following: ‘‘per ton of Indian coal— 

9 ‘‘(i) produced by the taxpayer at an 

10 Indian coal production facility, and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 975 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) sold (either directly by the tax2 payer or after sale or transfer to one or 

3 more related persons) to an unrelated per4 son.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 this section shall apply to coal produced and sold after 

7 January 1, 2017. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 225 

Designating July 22, 2017, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2017 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. RISCH, 

Mr. CORNYN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. UDALL, Mr. THUNE, Mr. MERKLEY, and Mr. 

ROUNDS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

AUGUST 2, 2017 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 22, 2017, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ‘‘cowboys’’, helped to establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliations; 


sradovich on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 225 ATS 

Whereas the cowboy, who lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment, is an excellent steward 

of the land and its creatures; 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy through the work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who contribute to the economic well-being of every State; 

Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working 

ranch rodeo events annually, making rodeo one of the 

most-watched sports in the United States; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

cowboys span every generation and transcend race and 

gender; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 22, 2017, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 


sradovich on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 225 ATS 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 activities. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RAOIATIQI\; 

MEMORANDUM 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

Carissa Cyran 

Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0602, EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0603, and EPA-1-IQOAR-20 13-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings with stakeholders during the week of June 15.2015. 

On June 15, Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiation Joseph Goffman met with David Doniger of the National Resource Defense Council. 

Sign-in sheet attached. 

On June 15, Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiation Joseph GotTman met with representatives from the National Resource Defense 

Council. Sign-in sheet attached. 

On June 17, Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation Janet McCabe spoke with 

members of the Clean Energy Group. organized by Michael Bradley. 

On June 17, Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiation Joseph Gof'fman met with Arvin Gancsan from Advanced Energy Economy. 

Internet Address (URll · http 1/www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Pr~nted wtth Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100o/. Postconsumer Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper 
Date: June 15, 2015 

Meeting: One-on-One with David Doniger, NRDC 

Rule(s) Discussed: Cf-P 

Written Materials? Y ~ 

I Name 

fMA 

I • 

II ID 

/ 

({)tl 

.... w-fl ~~ a 

I 

I 

Organization 

/J!LrJr 

1-

-

Phone N umber 

7A -z. z..ri -z 'f (J J I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 
Date: June 15, 2015 

Meeting: NRDC Meeting Re: Standards for New and Existing Power Plants 

Rule(s) Discussed: ! I ( {6 j ~ {cf.) 

Written Materials? YiiJ 

I Name Organization Phone Number I 

: 

-:S"oc & o-f-1.,.-,"'' £/17-

~') H~.tt!e L_ ~fA-

~~M ~~ WRO~ I Ju 7. r '7&:! - :JL/:22-

Pt<.-Jt:l))rl /V( C, ~ /llf2oc Zd 1- ?.5r) ~ -z..y- o 1 ;? / tJfl. fJ ( ~ ~!frJ'h I ~'}.....;- l1t,l-~~ 

' J 

I 

-

I 

I 

I 

-

-

>-

- -
335 A.2d 338.

#### Gloria Corona *et al. vs.*Robert F. Burns, *Secretary of State et al.*

APRIL 11, 1975.

Present: Roberts, C. J., Paolino, Joslin, Kelleber and Doris, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case was consolidated for hearing on appeal with *Chase*v. *Burns,*114 R. I. 485, 335 A.2d 334 (1975). The issues in the two cases are substantially the same, and our decision today in *Chase*is dispositive of this appeal.

Accordingly, the defendants’ appeal is denied and dismissed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings.

*485
      *Anthony R. Berretto,*for plaintiffs.

*Richard J.*Israel, Attorney General, *George H. Egan,*Special Asst. Attorney General, *Maurice W. Hendel,*for defendants.
#### Robert Ashworth *vs.*Newton R. Frost.

May 12, 1890.

Action for Services — Evidence.—The evidence in this case examined and considered. *Held*to be sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Eamsey county, *Kerr,*J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $659.57 for plaintiff.

*S. C. Biggs,*for appellant.

*Reynolds & Stewart,*for respondent.

Collins, J.

The only question for consideration here is as to the sufficiency of the testimony to sustain that part of the verdict in plaintiff’s favor which was awarded, admittedly, upon his second cause of action as set forth in the complaint. This was for services alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff in and about the purchase of certain real property for defendant, and at his request. From an examination of the testimony relative to this cause of action, it is evident that the order of the court below refusing a new trial must be affirmed. That defendant bought this property is undisputed, and there is no doubt but that the purchase was made by the plaintiff for him, although the evidence tends to show that the latter was to have an interest therein thereafter, and upon the payment of an agreed sum of money. The plaintiff testified in the most positive manner to a verbal promise made by defendant to compensate him. for the services and in the amount alleged in the complaint; and the liability of the defendant to that amount was recognized in the written *260agreement entered into between the parties, wherein, upon certain conditions, defendant contracted to sell and convey to plaintiff an interest in the realty, and to allow him, as part-payment therefor, the sum stated in the complaint, “for services heretofore rendered in purchasing” the same. The plaintiff also testified that when this contract was entered into, defendant orally promised to pay him the amount specified for services, in case he should be unable to purchase as he contemplated, and there is nothing in the written contract which indicates that,- in .ease the plaintiff failed to comply with its conditions, the liability of the defendant to compensate him for his services no longer existed. Again, there was testimony tending to support the plaintiff’s assertion that he was not in default upon the contract, but that the defendant refused to comply with its terms. Following the well-known rule of this court, in cases where there is testimony reasonably tending to support the verdict, the order appealed from is affirmed. .
#### (A) Joseph G. D’Aprile, Respondent, v. Buonomo’s Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (B) James De John et al., Appellants, v. Santelli Construction Co., Respondent. (C) Rose De Vito et al., Appellants, v. Utica Transit Corp., Respondent. (D) Mary Richardson et al., Appellants, v. Rose Kingsley, Respondent. (E) Nellie Rosato et al., Appellants, v. Utica Transit Corp., Respondent. (F) Paul J. Salerno, Appellant, v. Walter V. Reynolds, Respondent. (G) Albert J. Schneble et al., Respondents, v. Frederick Nestico, Appellant. (H) Benjamin E. Villareale, Appellant, v. Terruli Construction Inc., Respondent. (I) Benjamin E. Villareale et al., Appellants, v. Terruli Construction Inc., Respondent. (J) Joseph Galasso, Appellant, v. Agatina B. Palumbo, Respondent.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
Publications

Appendix Table B2. Coded-wire tags from ingested juvenile salmon recovered in the stomachs of northern squawfish during electrofishing efforts, 1991.

aIndividual specimens of northern squawfish are identified by a combination of collection number and predator number.bSampling periods generally began at 2100 h and terminated the following morning at 0900 h.cTime that the electrofishing effort began.dLocation codes (2 characters): TC = Tanner Creek transect area; other Columbia River transect areas, where 1st character O = Oregon shoreline and W - Washington shoreline; 2nd character, 1-4, transect areas (refer to Figure 3 for precise locations).eAG D1 D2 = Agency code, Data 1 code, Data 2 code. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text. 

Table of Contents
#### 2509.400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart supplements subpart 9.4 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation by prescribing NSF policies and procedures and assigning responsibility for making debarment and suspension decisions. Nothing in this subpart is intended to alter the effect of subpart 9.4.
17.105-1 Uses. ( a ) Except for DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, the contracting officer may enter into a multiyear contract if the head of the contracting activity determines that— ( 1 ) The need for the supplies or services is reasonably firm and continuing over the period of the contract; and
( 2 ) A multiyear contract will serve the best interests of the United States by encouraging full and open competition or promoting economy in administration, performance, and operation of the agency's programs.
( b ) For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, the head of the agency may enter into a multiyear contract for supplies if— ( 1 ) The use of such a contract will result in significant savings of the total estimated costs of carrying out the program through annual contracts;
( 2 ) The minimum need to be purchased is expected to remain substantially unchanged during the contemplated contract period in terms of production rate, procurement rate, and total quantities;
( 3 ) There is a stable design for the supplies to be acquired, and the technical risks associated with such supplies are not excessive;
( 4 ) There is a reasonable expectation that, throughout the contemplated contract period, the head of the agency will request funding for the contract at a level to avoid contract cancellation; and
( 5 ) The estimates of both the cost of the contract and the cost avoidance through the use of a multiyear contract are realistic.
( c ) The multiyear contracting method may be used for the acquisition of supplies or services.
( d ) If funds are not appropriated to support the succeeding years' requirements, the agency must cancel the contract.
[61 FR 39204, July 26, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 67774, Sept. 30, 2016]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 15 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Mexico City policy should be 

permanently established. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2017 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. DAINES, Mr. MORAN, Mr. SASSE, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

CRUZ, and Mr. PAUL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Mexico City 

policy should be permanently established. 

Whereas section 104(f) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151b(f)) (commonly referred to as the 

‘‘Helms amendment’’) states that no foreign assistance 

funds may be used to pay for the performance of abortion as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions; 

Whereas section 518 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 

(Public Law 109–102; 119 Stat. 2202) (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Siljander Amendment’’) states that no 

foreign assistance funds may be used to lobby for or 

against abortion; 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 15 IS 

Whereas, in 1984, President Ronald Reagan established the 

‘‘Mexico City Policy,’’ which prohibits foreign aid for 

family planning purposes from being given to foreign 

nongovernmental organizations that perform abortions or 

actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, 

regardless of the source of funding; 

Whereas, upon assuming office on January 20, 1989, President George H.W. Bush continued to enforce the Mexico 

City Policy as established by President Reagan; 

Whereas the Mexico City Policy was reestablished on January 

22, 2001, by President George W. Bush; and 

Whereas, on January 23, 2009, President Barack Obama rescinded the Mexico City Policy: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the President should immediately reapply 

3 and consider improving the Mexico City Policy; and 

4 (2) Congress should expeditiously consider stat5 utory changes that permanently codify the Mexico 

6 City Policy or an improved version thereof. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________ 

No. 18-3443 

___________________________ 

 

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v. 

Edgar Martinez-Sanchez

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________ 

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________ 

Submitted: July 10, 2020

Filed: July 15, 2020

[Unpublished] 

____________ 

 

Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ 

 

PER CURIAM.

Edgar Martinez-Sanchez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 

methamphetamine and cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846. The plea 

agreement waived his right to appeal his sentence unless it exceeded 293 months in 
- 2 -

prison. The district court1 gave him a 210-month sentence. In an Anders brief, 

Martinez-Sanchez’s counsel requests permission to withdraw and raises a 

Sentencing Guidelines enhancement and the substantive reasonableness of the 

sentence as potential issues on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967). 

We review the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver de novo. See 

United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010). Upon careful review, we 

conclude that the waiver in this case is both applicable and enforceable. See United 

States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an 

appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the 

defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, 

and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues 

exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal 

and grant counsel permission to withdraw.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District 

of Minnesota.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cybrdi Inc.
("We") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yanbiao Bai, the
chief executive officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of us.


DATE: May 14, 2008       By: /s/ Yanbiao Bai
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Yanbiao Bai, Chief Executive Officer and President
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-57100) and Form S-8(No. 33-40397 and No. 33-44776) of Flow International Corporation of our report dated August 10, 2004, except Note 2, as to which the date is December 16, 2004, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appears inthis Form 10-K/A. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Seattle, Washington 

December 17, 2004