alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 306 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 306

Recognizing the month of October 2017 as ``National Principals Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 25, 2017

  Mr. Franken (for himself, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Wicker) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the month of October 2017 as ``National Principals Month''.

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals, the National 
        Association of Elementary School Principals, and the American Federation 
        of School Administrators have declared the month of October 2017 to be 
        ``National Principals Month'';
Whereas principals are educational visionaries, instructional and assessment 
        leaders, disciplinarians, community builders, budget analysts, 
        facilities managers, and administrators of legal and contractual 
        obligations;
Whereas principals work collaboratively with teachers and parents to develop and 
        implement a clear mission, high curriculum standards, and performance 
        goals;
Whereas principals create school environments that facilitate great teaching and 
        learning and continuous school improvement;
Whereas the vision, actions, and dedication of principals provide the mobilizing 
        force behind any school reform effort; and
Whereas the celebration of National Principals Month would honor elementary 
        school, middle school, and high school principals, and recognize the 
        importance of principals in ensuring that every child has access to a 
        high-quality education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the month of October 2017 as ``National 
        Principals Month''; and
            (2) honors the contribution of principals in the elementary 
        schools, middle schools, and high schools of the United States 
        by supporting the goals and ideals of National Principals 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```
237.7003 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( a ) Use the following clauses in all mortuary service solicitations and contracts, except do not use the clauses at 252.237-7004, Area of Performance, in solicitations or contracts that include port of entry requirements: ( 1 ) 252.237-7003, Requirements, (insert activities authorized to place orders in paragraph (e) of the clause).
( 2 ) 252.237-7004, Area of Performance.
( 3 ) 252.237-7005, Performance and Delivery.
( 4 ) 252.237-7006, Subcontracting.
( 5 ) 252.237-7007, Termination for Default.
( 6 ) 252.237-7008, Group Interment.
( 7 ) 252.237-7009, Permits.
( 8 ) 252.237-7011, Preparation History.
( b ) Use the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property, with its Alternate I, in solicitations and contracts that include port of entry requirements.
[71 FR 3416, Jan. 23, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 37646, July 29, 2009; 79 FR 65593, Nov. 5, 2014; 84 FR 48505, Sept. 13, 2019]
Exhibit 11

CASCADE CORPORATION        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE        (Unauditedin thousands except per share data)

|                                                                |  | Quarter Ended April 30
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|
|
|Net income                                                      |  | $                     
|Less: preferred stock dividend                                  |  |                       
|                                                                |  |                       
|BASIC EPS                                                       |  |                       
|Income available to common shareholders                         |  |                       
|                                                                |  |                       
|Effect of dilutive securities                                   |  |                       
|Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock              |  |                       
|                                                                |  |                       
|DILUTED EPS                                                     |  |                       
|Income available to common shareholder plus assumed conversions |  | $                     
|                                                                |  |                       

---

QuickLinks
');
	document.write('

## FY 2013

Number of New Awards: 4
Average New Award: $266,174
Total New Award Funding: $1,064,699

## FY 2012

Number of New Awards: 4
Average New Award: $277,217
Total New Award Funding: $1,108,869

## FY 2011

Number of New Awards: 3
Average New Award: $326,656
Total New Award Funding: $979,964

Number of Continuation Awards: 0
Average Continuation Award: $0
Total Continuation Award Funding: $0
Number of Supplements: 4
Average Supplement Award: $4,509
Total Supplement Funding: $18,036

Total Award Funding: $998,000
Total Number of Awards: 7

## FY 2010

Number of new awards: 4
Average new award: $247,530
Total new award funding: $990,121

FY 2010 was the first year of funding for this program.

FIPSE Home
q310_1.htm





Summary of Amended Relocation Benefits for

Robert J. Driessnack, Chief Financial Officer

 

Relocation benefits previously disclosed. Our Chief Financial Officer, Robert J. Driessnack, joined the Company on January 19, 2009. The compensation arrangements
for Mr. Driessnack include eligibility to receive full relocation benefits in accordance with our standard program, under which we will reimburse






	
Ÿ  
	
Certain costs associated with transporting and storing normal household goods,





	
Ÿ  
	
Broker’s commissions and closing costs on the sale of his current residence, and





	
Ÿ  
	
Loan fees and closing costs for the purchase of a new residence.








We also will reimburse Mr. Driessnack for additional federal income tax liability incurred if certain moving expenses and other relocation benefits are included in his earned income, subject to limitations based on actual salary and other deductions.

 

Under our Company relocation program, Mr. Driessnack must reimburse us for a pro rata portion of relocation costs incurred by the Company if he terminates his employment within one year from his start date.





Extended relocation benefits. Our relocation program covers temporary housing costs and other housing benefits for up to six months. Due to the recent dramatic slow-down
in the housing market, employees relocating to accept jobs with the Company have had difficulty selling their prior home. During 2009, we have extended relocation benefits on a case-by-case basis for some non-executive employees.

 

In July 2009, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved the extension of relocation benefits for Mr. Driessnack. The extension is for an additional twelve months, for a total period of up to eighteen months of relocation benefits, subject to all the terms and conditions of the relocation program.
#### 252.245-7001 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Fan Zhang, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02450

Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr.

Groupon, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, October 3, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Agreed Motion to Schedule

Briefing of Lead Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Class Certification [161] is granted. The

parties are not required to appear on Friday, October 4, 2013. Mailed notice(ewf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02450 Document #: 163 Filed: 10/03/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2491
Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT

TO

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.

2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

AMENDMENT (this Amendment) to the Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan).
Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan.

WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), previously adopted the Plan, which was approved by the stockholders of the Company;

WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Plan, in March 2010, the Board of Directors of the
Company adopted amendments to the Plan to modify Outside Director Awards to provide that, on the date of each annual meeting of Stockholders of the Company beginning with the 2010 annual meeting of Stockholders and on each annual Stockholders
meeting thereafter, each Outside Director would no longer be granted an Outside Director Stock Option to purchase 3,500 shares of Stock, and in lieu thereof, each such Outside Director would be granted as of the date of each such annual meeting of
Stockholders beginning with the 2010 annual meeting of Stockholders, a Stock Award comprised of that number of shares of Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value of $25,000 on the date of grant; and

WHEREAS, all terms and conditions of the Plan, other than as specifically amended as set forth in this Amendment, shall remain in
full force and effect.

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan has been amended as follows:



| | 1. | The first paragraph of Section 8 of the Plan was amended by adding the following sentence at the end of such paragraph:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, no further grants of such Outside Director Stock Options shall be made to
Outside Directors after the date of the 2009 annual meeting of Stockholders.



| | 2. | The first paragraph of Section 9 of the Plan was amended by adding the following new subsection (c) thereof immediately following subsection (b) thereof:
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) On the date of the 2010 annual meeting of Stockholders of the Company, and on the date
of each annual meeting of Stockholders of the Company during each Company fiscal year thereafter, each Outside Director of the Company shall be granted a Stock Award comprised of that number of shares of Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value
of $25,000 on the date of grant.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Secretary of the Company has executed this Amendment and
certifies that the amendment to the Plan set forth above accurately reflects the amendment to the Plan adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company.



/s/ Joseph A. ZirkmanJoseph A. Zirkman, SecretaryDated: March 24, 2010
#### 252.237-7013 Instruction to offerors (bulk weight).

As prescribed in 237.7101(b), use the following provision:

# Instruction to Offerors (Bulk Weight) (DEC 1991)

(a) Offers shall be submitted on a unit price per pound of serviced laundry. Unit prices shall include all costs to the Government of providing the service, including pickup and delivery charges.

(b) The Contracting Officer will evaluate bids based on the estimated pounds of serviced laundry stated in the solicitation.

(c) Award generally will be made to a single offeror for all lots. However, the Contracting Officer may award by individual lot when it is more advantageous to the Government.

(d) Prospective offerors may inspect the types of articles to be serviced. Contact the Contracting Officer to make inspection arrangements.

(End of provision)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 3416, Jan. 23, 2006]
# C_2017085EN.01000102.xml

| 18.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8335 — AXA/Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations/Cible)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 85/02)

On 14 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8335. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8335. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EARNINGS METRIC

1

2014 GE CONSTRUCTION VS. NEW PROPOSED RULE (TWO-YEAR COHORT)

Jan 1

2014

Jul 1

2014

Jan 1

2015

Jul 1

2015

Jan 1

2016

Jul 1

2016

Jan 1

2017

Jul 1

2017

Jan 1

2018

Jul 1

2018

Jan 1

2019

GE Completers (2014 Rule)

AY15 & AY16

GE Earnings 

(2014 Rule) 

CY 18

GE Completers 

(New Rule) AY15

GE Earnings 

(New Rule) CY18

GE Earnings 

(New Rule) CY19

Jul 1

2019

Jan 1

2020

GE Completers 

(New Rule) AY16

CY18 Earnings are Inflated to $2019, then 

the median of earnings from both cohortyears combined is computed.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cybrdi Inc. (We") for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yanbiao Bai, the chief executive officer
of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                    
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                          
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of us.

Date: August 19, 2011

/s/ Yanbiao BaiYanbiao Bai, CEO and President

---
3400

3300

3300

3350

3300

3450

3400

3300

3350

3350

3450

3350

3400

3400

3300

3400

3400

3400

3300

3300

3300

3300

15

15

15

C O R D M

F M 1 2 9 0

B R Y S O N R D

C O R D 2 4

C O R D 2 5

C O R D 2 6

C O R D 2 8

C O R D 2 4

C O R D 2 6

C O R D L C O R D L

C O R D 2 4

F M 1 2 9 0

15

15

15

C O R D M

F M 1 2 9 0

B R Y S O N R D

C O R D 2 4

C O R D 2 5

C O R D 2 6

C O R D 2 8

C O R D 2 4

C O R D 2 6

C O R D L C O R D L

C O R D 2 4

F M 1 2 9 0

Coldwater Creek

Coldwater Creek

Coldwater Creek

Coldwater Creek

Coldwater Creek

Coldwater

Creek

Frisco

Creek

East

Capps

Switch NW Hannas

Draw West

Stevens SE West of

Gruver

Texhoma

South

Pleasure

Pond

Frisco

Creek

West

30"

140

40

N

000

000m

2

40

2

25

E

59

17'

22'

37'

22'

17'

42'

40

40

40

40

2

17

16

20

54

26

101°

30"

45' 30"

20'

101° 30"

40

40

40

2 2 2 000m

2 2

40

23

20

40

26

18

56

57 62

61 64

N

60 63

58

23

30"

30"

30"

15'

101° 42' 101°

36° 36°

30"

4

610

000

40'

45'

36°

40'

4100 000

E

40

40

000m

40

40

40

40

40

2 2 2

000m 2

2

40

2

40

2

2

2

22

21

2

19

18

40

16

28

17

27

60

22

59

56

21

55 63

58

24

61

55

28

54

37'

20'

FEET

36 15' °

40

40

40

40

40

2

2

24

19

15

62

25

FEET

FEET

590 000 FEET

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 36101-242

COLDWATER CREEK, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

COLDWATER CREEK QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Zone 14S

Imagery...................................................NAIP, August 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2005

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2002

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 35 ́

28 MILS

7° 3 ́

125 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14S

KF

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
### Swanson, Brian (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject:

All: 

### . ,,,,,).'!Ti·:T (': 

## · ,**j,~;f:,},,'n/;;** rSwanson, Brian (OST) (J:: r: ..:;;. · f:riday, August 17, 2012 3:56PM

· Jonsaari@q.com; 'airport@cityofclovis.org'; Robert L. Scavron (scavlaw@comcast.net);**,~s,cmayor@msn.com'** 1'-. 'L'Ocero, Jane, NMDOT' (Jane.Lucero@state.nm.us); Chuck Howell (chowell@flygreatlakes.com); Tim Sieber [tsieber@seaportair.com] (tsieber@seaportair.com); Devany, Dennis <OST> (Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov) RE: Soliciting Comments on EAS Proposals at Clovis and Silver City/Hurley/Deming, New Mexico- DUE September 10, 2012

I would like to clarify two points regarding the previous message soliciting comments on EAS proposals at Clovis and SilverCity/Hurley/Deming (SilverCity), New Mexico. First, GreatLakes' service between each community and the DenverInternational Airport (DEN) would be one-stop; however, service between SilverCity andPhoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) would be nonstop. The paragraph and table summarizing GreatLakes' proposal in the previous message should be replaced with the following: GreatLakes would utilize 19-passengerBeech 1900D aircraft, its code-share agreements with United and Frontier Airlines at DenverInternational Airport (DEN) and other interline and baggage agreements with the majority ofcarriers at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX), as summarized in the table below. Hub(s) Served/ Daily Annual Community Service Pattern Round Subsidy Trips Requirement one-stop (at Alamosa, New Mexico, Clovis Liberal, Kansas, SantaFe, New 2 $1,954,490 Mexico, orPueblo, Colorado) to (12 weekly) DEN one-stop (at Alamosa, New Mexico, SilverCity/Hurley/Deming SantaFe, New Mexico, orPueblo, 2 $2,098,460 Colorado) to DEN ornonstop to (12 weekly) PHX Second, SeaPort's average fares included in its subsidy calculation are net oftaxes and fees; however, fares shown the table presentation in the narrative portion ofthe proposals are inclusive oftaxes, fees, etc. Please refer to the table and supporting narrative (on page 7) and subsidy calculations on (on pages 13-16) ofSeaPort's submittal. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Brian Swanson at (202) 366-5392. Sincerely,

Dennis

### J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40009

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEXTER BROWN,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CR-4-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 13, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dexter Brown appeals from the denial of his motion to

suppress. He argues that the district court erred by refusing to

suppress crack cocaine discovered in his vehicle, in a bag inside

his passenger's purse, during a traffic stop. He contends that

neither the initial traffic stop nor the subsequent prolonged

detention were reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. He also

challenges the warrantless search of his passenger's purse. The

government does not question Brown’s standing to challenge the
No. 96-40009

-2-

search of his passenger’s purse, and thereby waives what would

appear to be a determinative issue.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

See Ornelas v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 1996 WL 276414 (U.S.

May 28, 1996). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment for

essentially the reasons given by the district court.

AFFIRMED.