Name:

Title:

Company:

Sign Date:

Name:

Title:

Company:

Sign Date:

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 1 of 7
Facility Information:

Georgia Power-Plant Wansley

1371 Liberty Church Rd.

Carrollton Ga 30116

Contact: Sarah Markham

Phone: 205-257-6780

Fax:

Email: sasander@southernco.com

Testing Company:

Weston Solutions

1625 Pumphrey Ave

Auburn Al 36832

Contact:Jon Howard

Phone: 334-466-5600

Fax: 334-466-5660

Email: j.howard@westonsolutions.com

Air Permit Number: Permitted Source ID/Name:

1 Plant Wansley Unit 1

Permitted Maximum Process Rate: Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: Target Process Test Rat

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

See Attached Report

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack 408.05 0 0 0 3600 5412 4 24

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 0

Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 0

Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 0

Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 0

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 2 of 7
-Due to source being oversaturated, moisture was calculated using source temperature and pressure.

-CTM-033 - Reference method requires a matrix spike, but this was not performed.

-M26A/CTM-033 sample train was modified using 6N caustic in the caustic impinger, in order to keep final sample 

pH > 12, method requirement. The sample volumes are corrected for the CO2 concentration; due to the use of the 

strong caustic CO2 is removed from the gas stream. This correction resulted in Runs 1 and 2 failing to meet the 

Isokinetic requirements of the method, see summary in attached test report.

- Please also note that the values presented in this database and the values in the hard copy report will vary slightly. 

We expect these differences are due to the fact that the ERT database recalculates all values. 

-Testing was conducted prior to the EPA FAQs page being updated, therefore, the reduced sample time and 

increased caustic strength and volume significantly raised the method detection limit for the CTM-033 component.

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 3 of 7
Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 4 of 7
Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 4/22/2010 4/22/2010 4/22/2010

Run Start Time 7:28:00 AM 8:59:00 

AM

10:14:00 AM

Run Finish Time 8:38:00 AM 10:07:00 

AM

11:27:00 AM

Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 31.747 34.047 33.245 33.013

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 22.49 22.81 22.26 22.520

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.84 13.35 13.31 13.167

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.3 12.2 12.1 12.200

Oxygen, % 8.4 6.9 6.4 7.233

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.75 124.17 124.08 123.667

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 2,003,076.5 1,962,591.3 1,965,038.0 1,976,901.93

3

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,624,170.0 2,592,566.6 2,594,201.3 2,603,645.96

7

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 110.0 109.2 106.5 108.567

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 5 of 7
Emissions Summary

Process Run Data

Location: Stack - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.213 0.484 0.249 0.315

lb/mmBtuO2 2.42E-04 4.58E-04 2.33E-04 0.000

ppm 1.56E-01 3.31E-01 1.74E-01 0.220

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0725 0.112 0.0933 0.093

lb/mmBtuO2 8.23E-05 1.06E-04 8.72E-05 0.000

ppm 9.69E-02 1.40E-01 1.19E-01 0.119

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 6 of 7
Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 7 of 7
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 4/22/2010 4/22/2010 4/22/2010

Run Start Time 7:28:00 AM 8:59:00 AM 10:14:00 AM

Run Finish Time 8:38:00 AM 10:07:00 AM 11:27:00 AM

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.2 0.21 0.21 0.207

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.988 0.988 0.988 0.988

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29 29 29 29.000

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 0.92 1.08 1.07 1.023

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 33.790 36.475 35.830 35.365

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 79.42 83.17 86.42 83.003

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 31.747 34.047 33.245 33.013

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 195.7 213.8 202.2 203.900

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 9.21 10.06 9.52 9.597

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 22.49 22.81 22.26 22.520

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.84 13.35 13.31 13.167

Dry Mole Fraction 0.8716 0.8665 0.8669 0.868

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.3 12.2 12.1 12.200

Oxygen, % 8.4 6.9 6.4 7.233

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 80.9 81.5 80.567

Fuel Factor 1.02 1.15 1.20

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.30 30.23 30.19 30.240

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.46 30.30 30.18 30.313

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -1.1 -1.1 -1.1 -1.100

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.92 28.92 28.92 28.920

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.75 124.17 124.08 123.667

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.6798985130

95342

0.658563145

021505

0.656895786

438691

0.665

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 48.16 47.58 47.61 47.783

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 908.143 908.143 908.143 908.143

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 2,003,076.5 1,962,591.3 1,965,038.0 1,976,901.9

33

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,624,170.0 2,592,566.6 2,594,201.3 2,603,645.9

67

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 110.0 109.2 106.5 108.567

Percent Excess Air, % 67.0 47.7 42.3 52.333

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 408.05 408.05 408.05

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 8 of 7