alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
28.307-2 Liability. ( a ) *Workers' compensation and employer's liability.* Contractors are required to comply with applicable Federal and State workers' compensation and occupational disease statutes. If occupational diseases are not compensable under those statutes, they shall be covered under the employer's liability section of the insurance policy, except when contract operations are so commingled with a contractor's commercial operations that it would not be practical to require this coverage. Employer's liability coverage of at least $100,000 shall be required, except in States with exclusive or monopolistic funds that do not permit workers' compensation to be written by private carriers. (See 28.305(c) for treatment of contracts subject to the Defense Base Act.)
( b ) *General liability.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall require bodily injury liability insurance coverage written on the comprehensive form of policy of at least $500,000 per occurrence.
( 2 ) Property damage liability insurance shall be required only in special circumstances as determined by the agency.
( c ) *Automobile liability.* The contracting officer shall require automobile liability insurance written on the comprehensive form of policy. The policy shall provide for bodily injury and property damage liability covering the operation of all automobiles used in connection with performing the contract. Policies covering automobiles operated in the United States shall provide coverage of at least $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage. The amount of liability coverage on other policies shall be commensurate with any legal requirements of the locality and sufficient to meet normal and customary claims.
( d ) *Aircraft public and passenger liability.* When aircraft are used in connection with performing the contract, the contracting officer shall require aircraft public and passenger liability insurance. Coverage shall be at least $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, other than passenger liability, and $200,000 per occurrence for property damage. Coverage for passenger liability bodily injury shall be at least $200,000 multiplied by the number of seats or passengers, whichever is greater.
( e ) *Vessel liability.* When contract performance involves use of vessels, the contracting officer shall require, as determined by the agency, vessel collision liability and protection and indemnity liability insurance.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 127 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work 

Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2017 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Take Our Daughters 

And Sons To Work Day. 

Whereas the Take Our Daughters To Work program was created in New York City as a response to research that 

showed that, by the 8th grade, many girls were dropping 

out of school, had low self-esteem, and lacked confidence; 

Whereas, in 2003, the name of the program was changed to 

‘‘Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work’’ so that boys 

who face many of the same challenges as girls could also 

be involved in the program; 

Whereas, in 2017, the mission of the program, to develop 

‘‘innovative strategies that empower girls and boys to 

overcome societal barriers to reach their full potential’’, 

fully reflects the addition of boys; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 127 IS 

Whereas the Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Foundation, a nonprofit organization, has grown to be one of 

the largest public awareness campaigns, with more than 

39,000,000 participants annually in more than 3,000,000 

organizations and workplaces representing each State; 

Whereas, in 2007, the Take Our Daughters To Work program transitioned to Elizabeth City, North Carolina, became known as the Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work Foundation, and received national recognition for 

its dedication to future generations; 

Whereas, every year, mayors, governors, and other private 

and public officials sign proclamations and lend support 

to Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Day; 

Whereas the fame of the Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work program has spread overseas, with requests and inquiries being made from around the world on how to operate the program; 

Whereas 2017 marks the 24th anniversary of the Take Our 

Daughters And Sons To Work program; 

Whereas Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Day will 

be observed on Thursday, April 27, 2017; and 

Whereas, by offering opportunities for children to experience 

activities and events, Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work Day is intended to continue helping millions of 

girls and boys on an annual basis to examine their opportunities and strive to reach their fullest potential: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the goals of introducing our 

3 daughters and sons to the workplace; and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 127 IS 

1 (2) commends all participants of Take Our 

2 Daughters And Sons To Work Day for the— 

3 (A) ongoing contributions that the partici4 pants make to education; and 

5 (B) vital role that the participants play in 

6 promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger fu7 ture for the United States. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2016481EN.01000701.xml

| 23.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 December 2016

(2016/C 481/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0444 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4342 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84645 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6008 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0706 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0975 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,22 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4096 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5266 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,6682 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4470 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4066 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1083 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5111 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5136 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 257,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6811 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2560 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5350 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 070,92 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6768 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,238 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,7526 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,622 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4761 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6087 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,0005 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0444

JPY

Japanese yen

122,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4342

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84645

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6008

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0706

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0975

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,22

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4096

RON

Romanian leu

4,5266

TRY

Turkish lira

3,6682

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4470

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4066

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1083

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5111

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5136

KRW

South Korean won

1 257,21

ZAR

South African rand

14,6811

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2560

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5350

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 070,92

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6768

PHP

Philippine peso

52,238

RUB

Russian rouble

63,7526

THB

Thai baht

37,622

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4761

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6087

INR

Indian rupee

71,0005

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016374EN.01000501.xml

| 13.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/5

---

Calls for proposals under the annual work programme for 2016 and the financing for the implementation of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 6380 (1) amending Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 1775)

1

(2016/C 374/05)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, is hereby launching two calls for proposals in order to award grants in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the annual work programme for 2016 and the financing for the implementation of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector:

| — | CEF-Transport-2016-AP-Cohesion envelope, with an indicative budget of EUR 250 million |
| --- | --- |

—

CEF-Transport-2016-AP-Cohesion envelope, with an indicative budget of EUR 250 million

| — | CEF-Transport-2016-AP-General envelope, with an indicative budget of EUR 190 million |
| --- | --- |

—

CEF-Transport-2016-AP-General envelope, with an indicative budget of EUR 190 million

The deadline for the submission of proposals is 7 February 2017.

7 February 2017

The complete texts of the calls for proposals are available on:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-transport/apply-funding/2016-cef-transport-calls-proposals

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 6380 of 7 October 2016 amending Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 1775 establishing an Annual Work Programme for 2016 and the financing for the implementation of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector.

1

---
#### 252.219-7009 Section 8(a) direct award.

As prescribed in 219.811-3(1), use the following clause:

# Section 8(a) Direct Award (OCT 2018)

(a) This contract is issued as a direct award between the contracting office and the 8(a) Contractor pursuant to the Partnership Agreement between the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Defense. Accordingly, the SBA, even if not identified in Section A of this contract, is the prime contractor and retains responsibility for 8(a) certification, for 8(a) eligibility determinations and related issues, and for providing counseling and assistance to the 8(a) Contractor under the 8(a) Program. The cognizant SBA district office is:

[*To be completed by the Contracting Officer at the time of award*]

(b) The contracting office is responsible for administering the contract and for taking any action on behalf of the Government under the terms and conditions of the contract; provided that the contracting office shall give advance notice to the SBA before it issues a final notice terminating performance, either in whole or in part, under the contract. The contracting office also shall coordinate with the SBA prior to processing any novation agreement. The contracting office may assign contract administration functions to a contract administration office.

(c) The 8(a) Contractor agrees that it will notify the Contracting Officer, simultaneous with its notification to the SBA (as required by SBA's 8(a) regulations at 13 CFR 124.515), when the owner or owners upon whom 8(a) eligibility is based plan to relinquish ownership or control of the concern. Consistent with section 407 of Public Law 100-656, transfer of ownership or control shall result in termination of the contract for convenience, unless the SBA waives the requirement for termination prior to the actual relinquishing of ownership and control.

(End of clause)

[63 FR 33588, June 19, 1998, as amended at 67 FR 11437, Mar. 14, 2002; 72 FR 51188, Sept. 6, 2007; 83 FR 54682, Oct. 31, 2018]
Dear Superintendent:

As we complete the second year of implementation of the landmark No Child Left 
  Behind Act (NCLB), I would like to express my appreciation for your efforts 
  in support of higher standards, greater accountability, and improved student 
  achievement in reading and other subjects for all of the nation's children. 
  We have made tremendous progress, and I know it has not been easy. As a former 
  superintendent, I understand very well the challenges that day-to-day implementation 
  of historic reform like No Child Left Behind poses to those on the front lines. 
  In addition to the substantial resources we have already provided in implementing 
  the law, I have established the No Child Left Behind Superintendents Hotline.

In recognition of your crucial role in implementing the law, the Hotline is 
  a special resource for superintendents seeking answers to questions about No 
  Child Left Behind and its implementation. We welcome your questions on any topic, 
  including Reading First, adequate yearly progress, the highly qualified teacher 
  provisions, public school choice options, and supplemental educational services. 
  The Hotline will put you a phone call or e-mail away from targeted, concise, 
  and rapid responses to your pressing questions about NCLB. My expectation is 
  that it will help all school districts across the country implement NCLB more 
  effectively. The Hotline is available exclusively to superintendents.

The NCLB Superintendents Hotline has begun operation and is staffed on weekdays, 
  8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time. After hours, the Hotline is available to receive messages. 
  Superintendents will be able to contact the Hotline by phone, toll-free, at 
  1-888-NCLB-SUP (625-2787) or by e-mail at NCLBSUP@ed.gov. Enclosed, please find your personal NCLB Superintendents 
  Hotline card for quick reference in using the new service. The Hotline staff 
  will ensure that all issues are addressed as quickly as possible. Also, if you 
  would like to receive regular updates on Departmental news and activities, please 
  be sure to provide the staff with your name, district, and contact information.

I hope you will find this new resource, in conjunction with the wide variety 
  of policy guidance documents available on the Department's Web site, www.ed.gov, 
  helpful in turning the vital vision of the No Child Left Behind Act into a reality 
  in every school. I send my best wishes for the new year.

Sincerely,

/s/

Rod Paige

|Last Modified: 01/13/2005
|-------------------------
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-1 

Appendix E: Agency Letters 

E.1 INRODUCTION 

The agency comment letters received on the project in response to the DEIS were from the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency and USDI-Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance. These 

letters are included below. 

E.2 AGENCY LETTERS 

E.2.1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 MT Office: Page E-2 to E-22 

E.2.2 USDI Office of Environmental Policy & Compliance: Page E-23 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-2 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-3 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-4 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-5 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-6 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-7 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-8 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-9 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-10 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-11 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-12 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-13 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-14 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-15 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-16 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-17 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-18 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-19 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-20 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-21 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-22 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E Page E-23 
Appendix E: Agency Letters 

Page E-24 Ashland Travel Management Final EIS – Appendix E

- End of Appendix E -
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.46 N 76.63 WMeters AGL
UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.



Exhibit 99



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT



To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries



We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and
the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/    BROWN, DAKES, WANNALL & MAXFIELD, P.C.
|Brown, Dakes, Wannall & Maxfield, P.C.       
|Fairfax, Virginia                            
|February 18, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 467 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 467

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Sergeant at 
                   Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2018

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Sergeant at 
                   Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives be notified of the 
election of the Honorable Michael C. Stenger as Sergeant at Arms and 
Doorkeeper of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
### 1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS (Filed: July 11, 2016)

No. 14 -482V

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

GARLAND L. SNYDER and * JENNIFER D. SNYDER, parents and * natural guardians of J.L.S., a minor * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

child

, * Acute Disseminated

* Encephalomyelitis ( “ ADEM ” );

P etitioner s, * Influenza ( “ Flu ” ) Vaccine.

*

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Esq., Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Michael P. Milmoe, Esq ., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Roth , Special Master:

On June 4, 2014, Garland L. Snyder and Jennifer D. Snyder ( “ petitioner s ”) filed a petition for compensation on behalf of their minor child, J.L.S., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 Petitioner s allege that J.L.S. developed Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis ( “ ADEM ” ) as a result of receiving an influenza vaccination on November 9,

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).

### 2

2011

. See Stipulation, filed July 11, 2016, at ¶¶ 1 -4. Respondent denies that the influenza

immunization caused J.L.S. ’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On July 11, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

A lump sum of $ 7 5 ,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioners, Garland Snyder and Jennifer Snyder. This amount represents compensation for all damages
that would b e available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipula tion attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount
and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in
accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
#### 217.7400 Scope.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures implementing 10 U.S.C. 3371, *et seq.*

[56 FR 36284, July 31, 1991, as amended at 87 FR 76993, Dec. 16, 2022]