alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christian Luis MORALES-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50348.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 6, 2008.

Filed June 6, 2008.

David P. Curnow, Kyle W. Hoffman, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*730Victor M. Torres, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROBART, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable James L. Robart, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Christian Luis Morales-Morales appeals the district court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the official restraint doctrine, its denial of his motion for acquittal, and its imposition of a 103-month term of imprisonment following his conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

The district court properly declined to give an “official restraint” jury instruction because the evidence did not support such a theory. *United States v. Vela-Robles,*397 F.3d 786, 789 (9th Cir.2005). Although Morales was observed crossing the border for about 10 seconds, and the government was later alerted to his potential destination after he triggered a sensor approximately 500 yards north of the border, there is no dispute that Morales’s precise location in the United States was unknown for at least 15 minutes. See *id.*at 789 (“Detection by a seismic sensor does not amount to observation or surveillance for the purpose of showing official restraint.”). Morales “was not under constant observation by governmental authorities from the moment he set foot in this country until the moment of his arrest.” *United States v. Ramos-Godinez,*273 F.3d 820, 825 (9th Cir.2001) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Likewise, the denial of Morales’s motion for acquittal was appropriate because a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Morales had entered the United States free of official restraint. *See United States v. Bello-Bahena,*411 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir.2005).

Morales also contends that his 103-month sentence should be vacated because the district court presumed the Guidelines range was reasonable without taking into account his family history and ties to the United States and it is greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing. These contentions are belied by the record. We conclude that there was no procedural error and that Morales’s sentence is substantively reasonable. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Program Office:** International Education and Graduate Programs**CFDA Number   :**	84.316
**Program Type  :**	Discretionary/Competitive Grants

This program provides direct grants to Native Hawaiian educational organizations or educational entities with experience in developing or operating Native Hawaiian programs or programs of instruction conducted in the Native Hawaiian language, to enable such organizations or entities to provide a program of baccalaureate and postbaccalaureate fellowship assistance to Native Hawaiian students.

The program was designed to support

1. graduate and undergraduate scholarships for native Hawaiian students enrolled      in institutions of higher education;
2. counseling and support services for those students;
3. guidance and counseling for native Hawaiian secondary school students who      are potential scholarship recipients;
4. faculty development programs for the improvement and matriculation of native      Hawaiian students;
5. research and evaluation activities.

**NOTE:**  This program has been affected by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.  The Act consolidates six separate Native Hawaiian programs into one comprehensive grant under CFDA 84.362A.  The Office of Postsecondary Education, International Education and Graduate Programs Service, will continue to administer two continuation grants in Fiscal Years 2003, 2004, and 2005.  However, **the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Native Hawaiian Education Program will administer all new grant competitions for this program**.

**Services:**This program gives priority to providing fellowship support for professions in which Native Hawaiians are underrepresented. Awards are based on academic potential and financial need. The program provides counseling and support services for students receiving fellowship assistance, college preparation and guidance counseling at the secondary school level, and implements a faculty development program for the improvement and matriculation of Native Hawaiian students.

|Last Modified: 02/24/2005
|-------------------------
#### 24.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures that apply requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) (the Act) and OMB Circular No. A-130, December 12, 1985, to Government contracts and cites the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.)

[48 FR 42277, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 38517, Sept. 18, 1990]
Performance Reports

A grant under this competition, you must ensure that the necessary processes and systems are developed to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition.  This does not apply if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).

At the end of the project period, the grantee must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary.  If a grantee receives a multi-year award, it must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118.  The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c).  For specific requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.

Performance Measures

For purposes of Department reporting under 34 CFR 75.110, the Department will use the following performance measures to evaluate the success of the RPED Grants Program:  
- The number of rural students that received direct student services supported by the grant.
- The change in the annual enrollment rate at grantee institutions of rural students that received direct student services supported by the grant from one year to the next.
- The number of rural students that received direct student services supported by the grant that transfer to a 4-year institution or obtain a degree or certificate of completion.
- The number of rural students that received direct student services supported by the grant who obtain an internship, apprenticeship, or employment.

Grantees will be asked to collect and report data on this measure in the annual performance report (EDGAR, 34 CFR 75.590).

FIPSE Home
  Last Modified: 04/26/2023
#### 252.225-7059 Prohibition on Certain Procurements from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region-Representation.

As prescribed in 225.7022-5(a), use the following provision:

# Prohibition on Certain Procurements From the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region—Representation (Jun 2023)

(a) *Definitions.* *Forced labor,* and *XUAR,* as used in this provision, have the meaning given in the 252.225-7060, Prohibition on Certain Procurements from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, clause of this solicitation.

(b) *Prohibition.* DoD may not knowingly procure any products mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced labor from XUAR or from an entity that has used labor from within or transferred from XUAR as part of any forced labor programs, as specified in paragraph (b) of the 252.225-7060, Prohibition on certain procurements from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, clause of this solicitation.

(c) *Representation.* By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that it has made a good faith effort to determine that forced labor from XUAR will not be used in the performance of a contract resulting from this solicitation.

(End of provision)

[87 FR 76984, Dec. 16, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 37797, June 9, 2023]
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications
NOAA-NMFS-NWFSC TM-31: Data Collection -- Groundfish 

Appendix A-3An example of a California Department of Fish and Game Landing Receipt that is reserved for groundfish landings.
To return to text, use your browser's Back button. Table of Contents
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of US Airways, Inc. (Company)
for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), David N. Siegel, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Neal S. Cohen, as Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ David N. Siegel
--------------------------------
Name:  David N. Siegel
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 26, 2003

/s/ Neal S. Cohen
--------------------------------
Name:  Neal S. Cohen
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 26, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### 3009.171 Prohibition on Federal Protective Service guard services contracts with business concerns owned, controlled, or operated by an individual convicted of a felony.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            15,955          
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                72
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0 
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       72,005 
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             4,097
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               4,087
<LOANS>                                          254,573
<ALLOWANCE>                                        2,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   356,129
<DEPOSITS>                                       297,004
<SHORT-TERM>                                      13,052
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                3,284
<LONG-TERM>                                       11,248
<COMMON>                                           3,296
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        28,245  
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   356,129
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   20,007          
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  4,510 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     903
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  25,420
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                11,042
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                12,148
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             13,272
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        480
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   602
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   10,986 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    4,718
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         3,580
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       3,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      4.10          
<LOANS-NON>                                           38
<LOANS-PAST>                                         166
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     242
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    2,800
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   2,220
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        360
<RECOVERIES>                                          63
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  2,403
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               2,403
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 355 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 355

   Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations in the 
                                Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2017

Mr. Lankford submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations in the 
                                Senate.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF NOMINATIONS.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Post-cloture consideration.--If cloture is invoked in 
        accordance with rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate 
        on a nomination described in paragraph (2), there shall be no 
        more than 8 hours of post-cloture consideration equally divided 
        in the usual form.
            (2) Nominations covered.--A nomination described in this 
        paragraph is any nomination except for the nomination of an 
        individual--
                    (A) to a position at level I of the Executive 
                Schedule under section 5312 of title 5, United States 
                Code; or
                    (B) to serve as a judge or justice appointed to 
                hold office during good behavior.
    (b) Special Rule for District Court Nominees.--If cloture is 
invoked in accordance with rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the 
Senate on a nomination of an individual to serve as a judge of a 
district court of the United States, there shall be no more than 2 
hours of post-cloture consideration equally divided in the usual form.
                                 <all>
```
#### 2825.206 Noncompliance.

Potentially fraudulent noncompliance under FAR 25.206(c)(4) shall be referred to the OIG for investigation.
# C_2017113EN.01000201.xml

| 11.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 April 2017

(2017/C 113/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0578 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4363 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85335 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6098 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0682 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1443 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,528 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,35 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2296 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5118 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9494 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4120 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4155 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2189 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5239 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4880 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 208,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6918 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3022 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4350 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 047,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6919 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,492 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 60,5034 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,653 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3175 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7586 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,2915 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0578

JPY

Japanese yen

117,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4363

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85335

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6098

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0682

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1443

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,528

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,35

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2296

RON

Romanian leu

4,5118

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9494

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4120

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4155

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2189

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5239

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4880

KRW

South Korean won

1 208,18

ZAR

South African rand

14,6918

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3022

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4350

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 047,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6919

PHP

Philippine peso

52,492

RUB

Russian rouble

60,5034

THB

Thai baht

36,653

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3175

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7586

INR

Indian rupee

68,2915

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
3.900 Scope of subpart. This subpart implements various statutory whistleblower programs. This subpart does not implement 10 U.S.C. 4701, which is applicable only to DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard. ( a ) 41 U.S.C. 4712 is implemented in 3.900 through 3.906. These sections do not apply to— ( 1 ) DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard; or
( 2 ) Any element of the intelligence community, as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). Sections 3.900 through 3.906 do not apply to any disclosure made by an employee of a contractor or subcontractor of an element of the intelligence community if such disclosure— ( i ) Relates to an activity of an element of the intelligence community; or
( ii ) Was discovered during contract or subcontract services provided to an element of the intelligence community.
( b ) Section 743 of Division E, Title VII, of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions), is implemented in 3.909, which is applicable to all agencies.
( c ) Section 3.907 of this subpart implements section 1553 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5), and applies to all contracts funded in whole or in part by that Act.
[88 FR 69520, Oct. 5, 2023]
#### 252.223-7000 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK Clinical Trials.                    

*Date:*                         February 23, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elena Sanovich, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7351, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-594-8886,                         *sanoviche@mail.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 29, 2021.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-02311 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2017095EN.01000101.xml

| 27.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 095/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.

OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.

OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.

OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.

OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 19.1407 [Reserved]