alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains Summary Financial Information extracted from the
Quarterly Report for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 of Carrols
Corporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statement.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                    $  2,442,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                             $    870,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                               $  2,973,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          $ 14,108,000
<PP&E>                                    $177,385,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           $(76,060,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            $306,898,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     $ 42,800,000
<BONDS>                                   $231,125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                $ 18,284,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              $306,898,000
<SALES>                                   $305,866,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          $306,027,000
<CGS>                                     $ 89,829,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             $253,822,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          $  1,639,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        $ 14,716,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           $  8,566,000
<INCOME-TAX>                              $  3,850,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       $  4,716,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              $  4,716,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| | PREVIOUS | NEXT | **NEW 
      SEARCH**
| | -------- | ---- | ----------------------

Map 
Collections



---

---



Africa, administrative divisions, 1950.

United 
States. Central Intelligence Agency. Map Division.

CREATED/PUBLISHED[Washington, D.C. : Central Intelligence Agency, 
1950]

NOTESShows political status of countries.

"11743 Map Division, CIA, 11-50."

Scale [ca. 1:38,000,000] (W 200--E 600/N 
400--S 350).



SUBJECTSAfrica--Maps.Africa--Politics 
and government--1945-1960--Maps.Africa.

MEDIUM1 map : col. ; 24 x 24 cm.

CALL NUMBERG8200 1950 .U5

REPOSITORYLibrary of Congress Geography and Map Division 
Washington, D.C. 20540-4650 USA

DIGITAL IDg8200 ct002839 
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/g8200.ct002839



| | PREVIOUS | NEXT | **NEW 
      SEARCH**
| | -------- | ---- | ----------------------
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2276

_____________________________

CAPITAL MARKETS GROUP, et al.,

Appellants,

v.

LENDINGHOME FUNDING CORP.,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Steven Fahlgren, Judge.

June 4, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Arthur I. Jacobs, Richard J. Scholz, and Douglas A. Wyler of 

Jacobs, Scholz & Wyler LLC, Fernandina Beach, for Appellants.

Morgan L. Weinstein of Weinstein Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale,

Damian G. Waldman of Law Offices of Damian G. Waldman, P.A., 

Largo, and David A. Friedman of Van Ness Law Firm, P.A., 

Deerfield Beach, for Appellee.
Posting an FDMS Docket without a F ederal R egister Notice

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Posting EPA

- HQ

- ORD

- 2012

- 0399 to Regulations.gov for Public Access

FROM: Joe DeSantis /s/

ORD/NCEA/IRIS

Thru: Vincent Cogliano /s/ Karen Hammerstrom for

Director, IRIS Division

ORD/ NCEA

Th is memo randum authorizes the posting of EPA

- HQ

- ORD

- 2012

- 0399 to Regulations.gov for public access

.

This docket will be opened to solicit public comment for the external review draft human health assessment titled “Toxicological Review of Ammoni a: In Support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)” (EPA/635/R

- 11/013C )

. The draft assessment was prepared by the National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA) within the EPA Office of Research and Development (OR D). EPA is releasing this draft assessment for the purposes of public comment and peer review. This draft assessment is not final as described in EPA’s information quality guidelines, and it does not represent and should not be construed to represent Age ncy policy and views.

This docket will be open for public comments from 06/04/2012 to 08/0 7 /2012. A Federal Register Notice announcing the public comment period will be posted on this docket when it is published.

The draft “Toxicological Review of A mmonia: In Support of Summary Information o n the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) ” is available primarily via the Internet on the NCEA home page under the Recent Additions and Publications menus at http://www.epa.gov/ncea. A limited number of pa per copies are available from the

Information Management Team, NCEA; telephone: 703

- 347

- 8561 ; facsimile: 703

- 347

- 8691

. If you request a paper copy, please provide your name, mailing a ddress, and the

document title.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Wegener Corporation


Johns Creek, Georgia





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-08017 and 333-27527) and Form S-8 (No. 33-45390, 33-42007, 333-29887, 333-51205 and 333-29889) of Wegener Corporation of our report dated December 1, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended September 2, 2011 and September 3, 2010.  Our report relating to the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.







/s/ Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP.Atlanta, Georgia

December 1, 2011
Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, LLP.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted **

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                June 2, 2006 | **/S/                DORRIT J. BERN**                |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Dorrit                J. Bern                        |
|                               | Chairman                of the Board                 |
|                               | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |                                                 |
| Dated:                June 2, 2006 | **/S/                ERIC M. SPECTER**               |
|                               | Eric                M. Specter                       |
|                               | Executive                Vice President              |
|                               | Chief                Financial Officer               |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

D. W., et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:12−cv−02276

Honorable Milton

I. Shadur

Board of Education of Proviso Township High Schools

District 209, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 27, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Milton I. Shadur: Motion hearing held 6/27/12.

Defendants' motion is granted without objection as to the Federal claims for lack of

federal subject matter jurisdiction. With the predicate for federal subject matter

jurisdiction thus lacking, the state law claims are also dismissed, but without prejudice to

their possible reassertion in a state court of competent jurisdiction. Motion to dismiss [15]

[17]is granted. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(srn, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02276 Document #: 24 Filed: 06/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:101
Chart 11432HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       11432          Edition:       14          Edition       Date: May       2004          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/29/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135823 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135823 COA: 269409 Oakland CC: 2005-204358-FH THUY THITHU NGUYEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 5. Port-side view of the National Oceanic and       Atmospheric Administration Ship Thomas Jefferson at sea. The       30-foot survey launch normally stowed on this side of the ship has been       deployed. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig5.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:29:28 EDT
28.305 Overseas workers' compensation and war-hazard insurance. ( a ) *Public-work contract,* as used in this subpart, means any contract for a fixed improvement or for any other project, fixed or not, for the public use of the United States or its allies, involving construction, alteration, removal, or repair, including projects or operations under service contracts and projects in connection with the national defense or with war activities, dredging, harbor improvements, dams, roadways, and housing, as well as preparatory and ancillary work in connection therewith at the site or on the project.
( b ) The Defense Base Act (42 U.S.C. 1651 *et seq.*) extends the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 901) to various classes of employees working outside the United States, including those engaged in performing— ( 1 ) Public-work contracts; or
( 2 ) Contracts approved or financed under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (Pub. L. 87-195) other than ( i ) contracts approved or financed by the Development Loan Fund (unless the Secretary of Labor, acting upon the recommendation of a department or agency, determines that such contracts should be covered) or
( ii ) contracts exclusively for materials or supplies.
( c ) When the Defense Base Act applies (see 42 U.S.C. 1651 *et seq.*) to these employees, the benefits of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act are extended through operation of the War Hazards Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*) to protect the employees against the risk of war hazards (injury, death, capture, or detention). When, by means of an insurance policy or a self-insurance program, the contractor provides the workers' compensation coverage required by the Defense Base Act, the contractor's employees automatically receive war-hazard risk protection.
( d ) When the agency head recommends a waiver to the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary may waive the applicability of the Defense Base Act to any contract, subcontract, work location, or classification of employees.
( e ) If the Defense Base Act is waived for some or all of the contractor's employees, the benefits of the War Hazards Compensation Act are automatically waived with respect to those employees for whom the Defense Base Act is waived. For those employees, the contractor shall provide workers' compensation coverage against the risk of work injury or death and assume liability toward the employees and their beneficiaries for war-hazard injury, death, capture, or detention. The contract shall provide either that the costs of this liability or the reasonable costs of insurance against this liability shall be allowed as a cost under the contract.
225.7013-2 Restrictions. ( a ) *Contract award ( 10 U.S.C. 8679 ).* Do not award a contract to construct in a foreign shipyard— ( 1 ) A vessel for any of the armed forces; or
( 2 ) A major component of the hull or superstructure of a vessel for any of the armed forces.
( b ) *Overhaul, repair, or maintenance ( 10 U.S.C. 8680 ).* ( 1 ) Do not overhaul, repair, or maintain, in a shipyard outside the United States or Guam, a naval vessel (or any other vessel under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy) homeported in the United States or Guam.
( 2 ) This restriction on overhaul, repair, or maintenance does not apply to— ( i ) Voyage repairs; or
( ii ) Repairs necessary to correct damage sustained due to hostile actions or interventions.
( 3 ) For a naval vessel classified as a littoral combat ship and operating on deployment— ( i ) Corrective and preventive maintenance or repair, whether intermediate or depot level, and facilities maintenance may be performed if the work is performed by U.S. Government personnel or U.S. contractor personnel— ( A ) In a foreign shipyard;
( B ) At a facility outside of a foreign shipyard; or
( C ) At any other facility convenient to the vessel;
( ii ) Foreign workers may be used to perform corrective and preventive maintenance or repair, only if the Secretary of the Navy, without power of delegation, determines that travel by U.S. Government or contractor personnel to perform the maintenance or repair is not advisable for health or safety reasons; and
( iii ) Foreign contractors may perform facilities maintenance only as approved by the Secretary of Navy.
[88 FR 73241, Oct. 25, 2023]
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-30 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:983
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-30 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:984
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-30 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:985
## Performance Reports

A grant under this competition, you must ensure that the necessary processes and systems are developed to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).

At the end of the project period, the grantee must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary. If a grantee receives a multi-year award, it must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.

## Performance Measures

For the purposes of Department reporting under 34 CFR 75.110, we have established the following set of performance measures for the Open Textbooks Pilot program grants:

- The number of students who enrolled in courses that use open textbooks and/or ancillary materials developed through the grant;
- The number of students who completed courses that used open textbooks and/or ancillary materials developed through the grant;
- The failure rate or withdrawal rate in courses that use open textbooks and/or ancillary materials compared with equivalent courses that used commercial textbooks;
- The average grade of students who completed a course that used open textbooks and/or ancillary materials developed through the grant compared with the equivalent average grade of students who used commercial textbooks;
- The number of faculty/instructors that use open textbooks and/or ancillary materials developed through the grant;
- The number of institutions within the consortium, and the number of institutions outside of the consortium, that adopted the open textbooks and/or ancillary materials developed through the grant;
- The number of courses among consortium members that adopted the open textbooks and/or ancillary materials developed through the grant, compared to those that continued to use commercial textbooks;
- The number of faculty/instructors or institutions that use tools for revising and remixing open educational resources content to facilitate adoption of open textbooks and/or ancillary materials developed through the grant;
- The average cost savings per student; and
- The total cost savings for students who used open textbooks and/or ancillary materials developed through the grant compared to students in the same course of study who used traditional textbooks.

FIPSE Home
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD EARL LEGARDY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

I. CEBALLOS, Law Librarian,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-15893

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00676-KJD-PAL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2013** 

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Ronald Earl Legardy appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging claims arising out

of the disclosure of information in his confidential legal materials. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the

FILED

JUN 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-15893

district court’s rulings regarding both an evidentiary hearing, Kashin v. Kent, 457

F.3d 1033, 1043 (9th Cir. 2006), and default judgment, Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d

1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Legardy’s motion

for an evidentiary hearing because Legardy had an opportunity to submit written

evidence and there were no factual issues warranting a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

55(b)(2) (court “may” conduct hearings to establish the truth of any allegation by

evidence before entering default judgment); Kashin, 457 F.3d at 1043 (“While the

district court has the discretion to hold an evidentiary hearing, it ‘should not do so

if the certification, the pleadings, the affidavits, and any supporting documentary

evidence do not reveal an issue of material fact.’” (citation omitted)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Legardy’s motion

for default judgment because Legardy failed to establish the merits of his § 1983

claim. See Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471-72 (setting forth factors for entry of default

judgment and noting the strong policy in favor of deciding cases on their merits);

Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092-93 (9th Cir. 1980) (affirming denial of

default judgment based on “the lack of merit in” plaintiff’s § 1983 claims).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Legardy’s motion to

alter or amend judgment because Legardy failed to establish grounds for such
3 12-15893

relief. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255,

1262 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and discussing grounds for

reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)).

AFFIRMED.
MEMO TO FIL E: MEETING WITH EARTH JUSTICE 4/10/2014 DISCUSS STATUS OF PROPOSED RULE ON C&D WOOD, PRRS, RR TIES .

## Emai 

# 1/?hone