alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer of YDI Wireless, Inc.,
certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K of YDI
Wireless, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.


Date: March 25, 2004                           /s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                        Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017113EN.01000101.xml

| 11.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8375 — HIG Capital/Infinigate)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 113/01)

On 7 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8375. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8375. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
About FOIA | About the Privacy Act | **FOIA Reading Rooms**Making a Request | FAQs | Contacts | Links



## FOIA e-Reading Room

### Final Statements of Policy

- Office for Civil Rights Reading Room includes policy documents and related materials issued by the Department's Office for Civil Rights.
- Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Archived Information and Reading Room includes policy documents, information related to previous administrations or programs, most frequently requested OESE FOIA information, links to U.S. Department of Education information on how to make a FOIA request, FOIA request guidelines, FOIA annual reports, and other FOIA-related documents.
- Legislation, Regulations, and Policy Guidance

|Last Modified: 10/17/2005
|-------------------------
# C_2017032EN.01000301.xml

| 1.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 January 2017

(2017/C 32/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0755 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4373 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86105 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4505 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0668 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8880 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,64 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3239 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5030 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0632 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4198 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4056 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3436 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4709 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5201 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 244,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4440 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3970 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4790 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 363,56 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7608 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,489 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,4302 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,793 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3535 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,2855 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,8005 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0755

JPY

Japanese yen

121,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4373

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86105

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4505

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0668

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8880

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,64

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3239

RON

Romanian leu

4,5030

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0632

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4198

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4056

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3436

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4709

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5201

KRW

South Korean won

1 244,76

ZAR

South African rand

14,4440

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3970

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4790

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 363,56

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7608

PHP

Philippine peso

53,489

RUB

Russian rouble

64,4302

THB

Thai baht

37,793

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3535

MXN

Mexican peso

22,2855

INR

Indian rupee

72,8005

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
2416.505 Ordering. ( a ) The contracting officer shall be the ordering official for all task orders except as provided for herein. The contracting officer may designate an ordering official when orders are to be placed on a firm fixed-price basis, the prices of the specific services or supplies to be provided under the order are set forth in the contract, and there is no negotiation of order terms. The contracting officer shall not designate ordering officials: ( 1 ) For contracts for services where prices are not tied to delivery of a completed service;
( 2 ) For any contracts where discounts need to be negotiated; or
( 3 ) In any other circumstances where adjustment of contract price or any other terms and conditions is necessary.
( b ) (6) The Departmental competition advocate also serves as the Departmental task and delivery order ombudsman in accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(6). In addition to the duties set forth at FAR 16.505(b)(6), the ombudsman shall recommend any corrective action regarding affording fair opportunity to contractors to compete for orders to the responsible contracting officer.
[77 FR 73527, Dec. 10, 2012]
#### 2452.219-74 Small business subcontracting goals.

As prescribed in 2419.708(b), insert the following provision:

# Small Business Subcontracting Goals (DEC 2012)

(a) This provision does not apply to offerors that are small businesses.

(b) The offeror's attention is directed to the FAR clause at 52.219-9, “Small Business Subcontracting Plan,” herein. HUD will evaluate proposed subcontracting plans using the Departmental small business subcontracting goals set forth in paragraph (c) of this clause. Offerors that are unable to propose subcontracting that meets HUD's established goals must provide the rationale for their proposed level of subcontracting.

(c) HUD's subcontracting goals are as follows:

(i) Small Business—__% [*Contracting Officer insert HUD small business subcontracting goal percentage*]

(ii) The total Small Business goal shown in paragraph (c)(i) of this clause contains the following subordinate goals [*Contracting Officer insert percentages*]:

(A) Small Disadvantaged Business—__%

(B) Women-Owned Small Business—__%

(C) Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business—__%

(D) HUBZone Small Business—__%

(End of provision)

[77 FR 73534, Dec. 10, 2012]
#### 25.702-2 Certification.

As required by the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-174), each offeror must certify that it does not conduct restricted business operations in Sudan.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

David Joel Dean, Appellant

No. 06-21-00020-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

2027868). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment and the bill of 

costs by deleting the time payment fee. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, David Joel Dean, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 7, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 129 

Designating April 2017 as ‘‘Second Chance Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2017 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 2017 as ‘‘Second Chance Month’’. 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 2017 as ‘‘Second Chance 

3 Month’’; 

4 (2) honors the work of communities, govern5 mental entities, nonprofit organizations, congrega6 tions, employers, and individuals to remove unneces7 sary legal and societal barriers that prevent an indi8 vidual with a criminal record from becoming a pro9 ductive member of society; and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 129 IS 

1 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 observe Second Chance Month through actions and 

3 programs that— 

4 (A) promote awareness of collateral con5 sequences; and 

6 (B) provide closure for individuals who 

7 have paid their debts. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Appeal No. 74-235.

#### R. A. B. Realty, Incorporated *v.*Nishan Serabian *et al.*

*Jackvony & De Conti, Daniel J. Donovan,*for plaintiff. *Joseph F. Penza, Jr.,*for defendants.

Motion of defendants to affirm judgment below pursuant to Rule 16 (g) denied.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES
OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Cybrdi Inc. (“We") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xue Bu, the principal
financial officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of us





Date:
December 22, 2008





/s/Xue
      BuName:
      Xue Bu, Principal Financial Officer
# C_2017072EN.01000101.xml

| 8.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 March 2017

(2017/C 72/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0576 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4340 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86710 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5218 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0730 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9443 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,52 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3075 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5384 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8894 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3920 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4191 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2120 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5153 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4920 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 215,71 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,7038 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2976 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4090 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 115,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7038 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,237 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,3560 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,111 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2974 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6124 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,4700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0576

JPY

Japanese yen

120,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4340

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86710

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5218

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0730

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9443

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,52

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3075

RON

Romanian leu

4,5384

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8894

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3920

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4191

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2120

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5153

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4920

KRW

South Korean won

1 215,71

ZAR

South African rand

13,7038

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2976

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4090

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 115,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7038

PHP

Philippine peso

53,237

RUB

Russian rouble

61,3560

THB

Thai baht

37,111

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2974

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6124

INR

Indian rupee

70,4700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 252.225-7062 Restriction on Acquisition of Large Medium-Speed Diesel Engines.

As prescribed in 225.7004-7(b), use the following clause:

# Restriction on Acquisition of Large Medium-Speed Diesel Engines (Jul 2023)

(a) *Definition.* As used in this clause—

*Large medium-speed diesel engines* means diesel engines whose revolutions per minute (RPM) fall between 300 and 1500 RPM with a displacement greater than 1500 cubic inches per cylinder.

(b) *Restriction.* As required by 10 U.S.C. 4864, the Contractor shall deliver under this contract large medium-speed diesel engines manufactured in the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or the United Kingdom.

(c) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in subcontracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, including subcontracts for commercial products and commercial services, that require large medium-speed diesel engines for new construction of auxiliary ships.

(End of clause)

[88 FR 46903, July 20, 2023, as amended at 89 FR 46816, May 30, 2024]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Able Home Health, LLC, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05608

Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown

Globe Medical−Surgical Supply Co., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, September 26, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown: The Court approves

the final accounting regarding disbursement of settlement proceeds. This case and the

claims of class members are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to settlement. Terminate

civil case. Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (et, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05608 Document #: 96 Filed: 09/26/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:638
**Who May Apply: (by category)**:  Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs)

Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 09/30/2014
|-------------------------
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Flow
International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K/A for the year ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ STEPHEN R. LIGHT       
|Stephen R. Light           
|Principal Executive Officer
|April 6, 2005
*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*













































































*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
Pages 141-144 - *Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
#### In the Matter of Ronald W. Lamb et al., Appellants, v. William D. Meisser et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Nassau, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law, to validate the petitions designating Ronald W. Lamib, John A. Carroll and Ellen Seid as nominees, .to be voted upon at the forthcoming .primary election, for the party positions of committeemen and committeewoman, respectively, of the County Committee of the Republican party from election districts in •the City of Glen Cove, County of Nassau, the said candidates appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 23, 1963, upon the decision of the court after a hearing, which dismissed the petition in this proceeding, Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, -and matter remitted to the Special Term for a hearing on the merits and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. The Special Term dismissed the petition in this proceeding on two grounds: (1) that the copy of the papers served upon respondents failed to contain a conformed copy of the verification which was in fact attached to the original petition; and (2) that the designating petitions, as delivered in sealed envelopes to the Board of Elections, consisted, of many loose sheets which were not bound or stapled together, even though they were numbered consecutively. In our opinion, these omissions constituted mere irregularities which in no way affected the substance or the validity of the petitions. It is to be noted that the statute (Election'Law, § 136, sulbd. 1) does not make the requirement of “ binding together” mandatory; nor does the statute preclude the court, by reason of the failure to physically join the consecutively numbered loose sheets, from treating them as valid petitions. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
  WRITTEN
    STATEMENT
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    (i)
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
    December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
    with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.   John
    L. Plueger
     Alan
    H. Lund
   93
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Jose Figueroa, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 26, 1978, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented before the Grand Jury was not legally sufficient to establish the crimes *930charged. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied and indictment reinstated. The evidence before the Grand Jury was sufficient to sustain the indictment (see *People v Wright,*68 AD2d 930). Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
U.S. Department of Education

Negotiated Rulemaking

Team II – Student Loan Program Issues

1990 K Street, NW, 8th Floor Conference Center

Washington, D.C.

February 13, 2012, 12:00 pm – 5:00 pm

February 14-16, 9:00 am – 5:00 pm

February 17, 2012, 9:00 am – 12:00 pm

Agenda1

Introduction

Agenda

Meeting Summary for Prior Session

Housekeeping and Other Issues

Review of Issues and Proposed Regulatory Language

1. Changes to Income Contingent Repayment (ICR) Plan 

--Process for Receipt of Cancellation

2. Changes to Income-Based (IBR) Repayment Plan 

--New Borrower Notification for Annual IBR Evaluation 

--Annual IBR Income Verification 

--Borrower Repayment After Leaving IBR 

--Process for Receipt of Forgiveness 

3. FFEL Repayment Disclosures: Borrowers Who Are Having Difficulty Making Payments and 

Borrowers Who Are 60-Days Delinquent 

4. Forbearance Provisions for Borrowers Receiving Department of Defense Student Loan 

Repayment Benefits

5. Borrowers Who Are Delinquent when Authorized Forbearance is Granted

6. Forbearance for Post 270-Day Defaulted Loan Borrowers Prior to Lender Claim Payment or 

Transfer to ED Default Collections 

7. Minimum Loan Period for Transfer Students in Non-Term and Certain Non-Standard Term 

Programs 

8. “Reasonable and Affordable” Payment Standard for Rehabilitation of Defaulted Direct Loans 

and FFEL Program Loans 

9. Rehabilitation of Defaulted Direct Loan and FFEL Program Loans Treatment of Borrowers 

Subject to Administrative Wage Garnishment

 

1

Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting.
10. Participation Rate Index Appeal for Single Cohort Default Rate Loss of Eligibility to Participate 

in the Direct Loan Program 

11. Repeal of Unnecessary FFEL Program Regulations 

12. Modification of Direct Loan Program Regulations 

13. Total and Permanent Disability Discharge – Single Application Process 

14. Total and Permanent Disability Discharge – Borrower Notification of Denial 

15. Total and Permanent Disability Discharge – Post-Discharge Monitoring of Employment 

Earnings 

16. Title IV Closed School Loan Discharge 

17. Satisfactory Repayment Arrangements on Defaulted Title IV Loans for Borrowers who also 

Rehabilitate the Loan 

18. School Enrollment Status Reporting Requirements 

19. Federal Perkins Loan Graduate Fellowship Deferment Eligibility 

20. Social Security Number Requirement for Assignment of Federal Perkins Loans to Department 

of Education 

21. Federal Perkins Loan Cancellation Rate Progression Across Cancellation Categories 

22. Federal Perkins Loan Economic Hardship deferment Debt-to-Income Ratio Provision

23. Federal Perkins Loan Break in Cancellation Service Due to Condition Covered Under the 

Family and Medical Leave Act (20 U.S.C. 2601 et. seq.) 

24. Standard for On-Time Rehabilitation Payments in the Federal Perkins Loan Program 

25. FFEL Program Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) Hearings for Defaulted Borrowers 

Next Steps

Revised Regulatory Text

Agenda for Session 3

Other