7362 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 17 / Thursday, January 28, 2021 / Notices 

8 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation methodology adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

9See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

10See Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin 

from Canada, the People’s Republic of China, India, 

and the Sultanate of Oman: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination (Sultanate 

of Oman) and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

27979 (May 6, 2016). 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries.8 Commerce calculated importerspecific ad valorem antidumping duty 

assessment rates by aggregating for each 

importer identified for the reported 

sales, the total amount of dumping 

calculated for sales for which that 

importer was reported and dividing 

each of these amounts by the total 

entered value of those sales. Commerce 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review where an importerspecific assessment rate is not zero or de 

minimis. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by OCTAL for 

which it did not know its merchandise 

was destined for the United States, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

such unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transactions. 

Consistent with its recent notice,9

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of this notice of final results 

of administrative review in the Federal 

Register for all shipments of subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication of the 

notice, as provided by section 751(a)(2) 

of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for 

OCTAL is the rate listed in the table 

above; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed in the 

table above, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding; 

(3) if the exporter was not covered in 

this review, a prior review, or the 

investigation, but the producer was 

covered, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established in the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 7.62 percent ad 

valorem, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation in this proceeding.10

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant POR 

entries. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 19, 2021. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Reprocessing Costs 

Comment 2: U.S. Commission Expenses 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01801 Filed 1–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; SABIT Participant 

Application, Participant Survey, 

Alumni Survey 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, on or after the date of publication 

of this notice. We invite the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

comment on proposed, and continuing 

information collections, which helps us 

assess the impact of our information 

collection requirements and minimize 

the public’s reporting burden. Public 

comments were previously requested 

via the Federal Register on November 

23, 2020, during a 60-day comment 

period. This notice allows for an 

additional 30 days for public comments. 

Agency: International Trade 

Administration. 

Title: SABIT Program: Applications 

and Questionnaires. 

OMB Control Number: 0625–0225. 

Form Number(s): ITA–4143P. 

Type of Request: Regular. 

Number of Respondents: 3,500. 

Average Hours per Response: 3 hours 

for application; 1 hour for program exit 

questionnaire; 1 hour for alumni success 

story form. 

Burden Hours: 7,000. 

Needs and Uses: The information 

collected by the SABIT application for 

participation in the SABIT Group 

Program will be used by ITA staff to 

determine the quality of applicants for 

SABIT’s programs and create 

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 17 / Thursday, January 28, 2021 / Notices 7363 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Reviews, 85 FR 35068, 35071 

(June 8, 2020). 

2See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the 

People’s Republic of China: Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 85 FR 48152 (August 10, 2020). 

3For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum 

for Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Drawn 

Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ issued concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

5The China-wide rate determined in the 

investigation was 76.53 percent. See Drawn 

Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 

78 FR 21592 (April 11, 2013). This rate was 

adjusted for export subsidies and estimated 

domestic subsidy pass through to determine the 

cash deposit rate (76.45 percent) collected for 

companies in China-wide entity. See explanation in 

Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s 

Republic of China: Investigation, Final 

Determination, 78 FR 13019 (February 26, 2013). 

delegations of professionals from 

Eurasia and other regions. The program 

exit questionnaire will be used to 

improve the program by determining 

what worked and what did not work 

well. The alumni success form will be 

used to track SABIT alumni to 

determine how well the program is 

meeting its foreign policy objectives. 

Affected Public: International 

individuals or households; International 

businesses or other for-profit and notfor-profit organizations. 

Frequency: Individuals can fill out up 

to one of each of the three types of forms 

per year. 

Respondent’s Obligation: All forms 

are collected on a strictly voluntary 

basis. 

Legal Authority: Section 632(a) of the 

Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as 

amended (the ‘‘FAA’’), and pursuant to 

the Department of State, Foreign 

Operations, and Related Programs 

Appropriations Act, 2018 (Div. K, P.L. 

115–141). 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. 

Follow the instructions to view the 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice on the 

following website www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain. Find this 

particular information collection by 

selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day 

Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or 

by using the search function and 

entering either the title of the collection 

or the OMB Control Number 0625–0225. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2021–01802 Filed 1–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–HE–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–983] 

Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that certain companies made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value. The period of review (POR) is 

April 1, 2019, through March 31, 2020. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable January 28, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adam Simons, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6172. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 8, 2020, Commerce published 

a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order drawn stainless 

steel sinks from the People’s Republic of 

China (China) covering the period April 

1, 2019, through March 31, 2020, with 

respect to 29 companies.1 In August 

2020, following a timely withdrawal 

request, we rescinded the review with 

respect to 23 of these companies.2

Therefore, the results of this review 

cover the six remaining companies. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order 

include drawn stainless steel sinks from 

the People’s Republic of China (China). 

Imports of subject merchandise are 

currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings 

7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive.3

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed and the electronic versions 

of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

A list of topics included in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

provided as an appendix to this notice. 

China-Wide Entity 

In accordance with Commerce’s 

policy, the China-wide entity will not be 

under review unless a party specifically 

requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a 

review of the entity.4 Because no party 

requested a review of the China-wide 

entity in this review, the entity is not 

under review, and the entity’s rate is not 

subject to change (i.e., 76.45 percent).5

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce finds that the two 

mandatory respondents, Jiangmen New 

Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd. (New Star) 

and Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen & Bathroom 

Products Co., Ltd. (Kohler), have not 

established their eligibility for a 

separate rate and are considered to be 

part of the China-wide entity for these 

preliminary results. Additionally, 

because the following companies did 

not submit separate rate applications or 

certifications, we preliminarily 

determine they are ineligible for a 

separate rate and are part of the Chinawide entity: Guangdong G-Top Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. (G-Top); Jiangmen 

Pioneer Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

(Pioneer); and Zhongshan Superte 

Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Superte). 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address what rate to 

apply to respondents who are not