alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SUMMARY CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED APRIL
28, 2000, AS SET FORTH IN THIS 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-28-2000
<CASH>                                      24,020,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,836,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                   633,506
<INVENTORY>                                 14,518,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,972,016
<PP&E>                                      50,736,727
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,393,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,123,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,610,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,894,695
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,557,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,123,060
<SALES>                                     77,159,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            77,159,581
<CGS>                                       46,290,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,290,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,182,547
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                91,325
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             148,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,686,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,921,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,765,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,765,808
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43


</TABLE>
null

394.01477
# C_2016392EN.01000203.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/2

---

Elections of Presidents of Chambers

(2016/C 392/04)

On 21 September 2016, the General Court, in accordance with Article 18 of the Rules of Procedure, elected Ms Pelikánová, Mr Prek, Mr Frimodt Nielsen, Mr Kanninen, Mr Gratsias, Mr Berardis, Ms Tomljenović, Mr Collins and Mr Gervasoni as Presidents of the Chambers sitting with three and with five Judges for the period from 21 September 2016 to 31 August 2019.

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the filing of theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”)by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (the “Company”), each of the undersignedhereby certifies that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Cascade Natural Gas Corporation and will be retained byCascade Natural Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or staff upon request.

 
|   | Date: February 7, 2006 |
|--------|------------------------|

 

 
|   | /s/ David W. Stevens                   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David W. Stevens                       |   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                   |   |
|   |                                   |   |
|   | /s/ Rick A. Davis                      |   |
|   | Rick A. Davis                          |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                |   |

 

----
## FY 2020

- Project Abstracts:     MS Word  (23K)

## FY 2019

- No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2018

- No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2017

- No new awards were made this fiscal year.

## FY 2016

- No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2015

- Project Abstracts:     PDF  (124K)

## FY 2014

- No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2013

- No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2012

- No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2011

- No new awards were made this fiscal year.  Funds were awarded only for non-competing continuation (NCC) grants.

## FY 2010

- Project Abstract:     MS Word  (32K) |  PDF  (144K)

FY 2010 was the first year of funding for this program.

Institutional Service Home
Motion Denied as Moot and Order filed December 18, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 18
- 00464
- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF K .C.L. AND M.W.L., CHILDREN
On Appeal from County Court at Law No
. 2

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16
- FD
- 2240



### ORDER This is an appeal from an order in a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship. The order concerns mother/petitioner/appellee R.E.E., father/respondent/appellant C.N.L., their two sons, and the Attorney General of Texas. In its notice of assignment of t he appeal to this court, the Galveston County District Clerk identified Carlos Garza, as attorney for Andrew Ross, as an “Interested Party.” This court accordingly designated Garza as a person who would receive all notices from the court regarding this app eal. Ross is not designated as a party in this court’s records. On November 29, 2018, Garza filed a “Motion for Dismissal of Andrew Ross as Appellee.” The motion states the district court erroneously designated Garza and2

Ross as interested parties and neit her Garza nor Ross were involved in the underlying case (No. 16

- FD

- 2240). I nstead, Ross, represented by Garza, was a party in a related case, No. 16

- FD

- 2242 . No appeal is pending from the related case. Because Ross has not been designated as an appellee in this court, we DENY AS MOOT his motion to dismiss. We will no longer send Garza notices regarding this case.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell
Case: 1:12-cv-05585 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 07/17/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:23
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 10 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk March 10 , 2021

162 468 ( 6 4 )

RONNIE MOUSSA EL

- ACHKAR,

Plaintiff,

and

OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC.,

PHYSIOMATRIX, INC., GENEX

PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC.,

ELITE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, PC,

and PRIME CARE CHIROPRACTIC, PC,

Intervening

- Plaintiffs,

SC: 162468

v COA: 348380

Wayne CC: 13

- 005965

- NI

SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.,

Defendant/Third

- Party Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF

ILLINOIS,

Defendant,

and

HALA BAYDOUN BAZZI and MARIAM

BAZZI,

Third

- Party Defendants,

and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

.

______________________________________ __ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel

to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on March 5

, 2021 , is accepted for filing

.
Exhibit 10.118


 


October 8, 2009


 


Kennedy-Wilson, Inc.

9601 Wilshire Boulevard

Beverly Hills, California 90210 

Attention: William McMorrow


 


Dear Bill:


 


This letter will summarize the terms and conditions
upon which The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian”) and
Kennedy Wilson, Inc. (“KW”) agree to modify the terms of Guardian’s
existing investment in KW as evidenced by a 7% Convertible Subordinated Note
due November 3, 2018 (“Note”).


 


1.               Guardian and KW
agree that the Conversion Price of the Note shall be changed from $40 per share
of Common Stock to $37.50 per share of Common Stock.


 


2.               Guardian and KW
agree that the Optional Conversion period with respect to the Note shall end on
May 3, 2017.


 


3.               Guardian and KW
agree to terminate: (a) their existing Shareholders Agreement subject to
entering into an appropriate shareholder voting agreement designed to protect
Guardian’s right to designate a director to the board of Prospect Acquisition
Corp. and (b) their existing Letter Agreement Re: Authorization of a New Class of
Common Stock


 


The parties agree that these proposed modifications
to Guardian’s investment are being agreed to in conjunction with the proposed
acquisition of KW by Prospect Acquisition Corp. (“Prospect”). To the extent
that acquisition is not consummated, these proposed modifications shall be of
no effect. The parties further agree to negotiate in good faith to memorialize
the understanding outlined in this letter in mutually acceptable documentation,
and further agree that such documentation shall be executed at such time as is
required to accommodate the closing of the acquisition/merger of KW by
Prospect.


 


This Letter shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


 


	
  The
  Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Thomas E. Sorell

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Executive
  Vice President and Chief Investment Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Kennedy-Wilson, Inc.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  William McMorrow

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  CEO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

 

DAVID CHUKWUNONSO ALLISON, ) 

Personal Representative of the ) 

Estate of JOY CHIEDOZIE ALLISON, ) 

Deceased, ) 

 ) No. 12 CV 4441 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Honorable Edmond E. Chang 

 ) 

THE BOEING COMPANY, et al, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Certain Defendants 

 

Pursuant to Rule 41 (A)(1)(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure, the 

plaintiff hereby dismisses McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Pratt & Whitney 

Canada Corp. and the Estate of Peter Waxtan as defendants in this case. No 

defendant has answered or moved for summary judgment; therefore, dismissal is 

effective on filing of this notice of dismissal. This action will continue against The 

Boeing Company and United Technologies Corporation only. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ David E. Rapoport_ 

 One of plaintiffs’ counsel 

 

David E. Rapoport, 6181294 

Michael L. Teich, 6216938 

Joshua L. Weisberg, 6287650 

Rapoport Law Offices, P.C. 

20 North Clark Street, Suite 3500 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

Case: 1:12-cv-04441 Document #: 23 Filed: 10/01/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:142
2

Telephone: (312) 327-9880 

Facsimile: (312) 327-9881 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of October, 2012, the foregoing was 

electronically filed with the U.S. District Court Clerk, Northern District of Illinois, 

Eastern Division, by using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of 

electronic filing to all CM/ECF participants. 

/s/ David E. Rapoport

David E. Rapoport, #6181294 

Rapoport Law Offices, P.C. 

20 North Clark Street, Suite 3500 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

(312) 327-9880 

(312) 327-9881 (fax) 

Email: drapoport@rapoportlaw.com

 

Case: 1:12-cv-04441 Document #: 23 Filed: 10/01/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:143
## James E. Krieger
2744 Moraine Valley Road Wauconda, Illinois 60084 jlcrieger@worldwide aviation.solutions jkrieger@highaboveaerials-com

Via Electronic Submission and Cer

-tiified U.S. Mail DOcket 4perations U. S. Department of Transportation West Building, Ground Floor 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590
December 10, 2015 Re: Application for Exemption from Specified Aviation Regulations Under Section 333 of the FAA 1Vlodernization and Reform Act of 2012. Applicant: Worldwide Aviation Solutions LLG , dba High Above

Aerial Imaging Attn: James Krieger 2 744 Moraine Valley Road Wauconda, Illinois 60084 Phone: 847-565-0215 Email: jkrieger@worldwideaviation. solutions

Dear Madam or Sir, Please accept this letter as a supplement to the exemption request submitted by Worldwide Aviation Solutions LLG (the"Applicant"). The Applicant's exemption request is currently pending under pocket Number FAA-2015-6896-0001. Worldwide Aviation Solutions LLG hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include: 1) A DJI Inspire 1 Pro X5 small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS). Relevant facts and reasoning are: The DJI Inspire 1 Pro X5 is part of DJI Innovation's family of mission-proven multi-rotor sUAS. This sUAS uses essentially the same flight control and RC transmitter category and is built with similar components to the aircraft specified in the original exemption request. The DJI Inspire 1 Pro X5 is slightly larger than the DJI Phantom 2 Vision but weighs far less than the 55 pound maximum. This sUAS employs the DJI Inspire 1airframe and an updated Zenmuse X5 camera. Complete specifications for this sUAS are

contained in Appendix 1. The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in the original exemption request apply without modification to this application to include the DrJI Inspire Pro X5 in it. 2) After receiving a proper FAA exemption, Worldwide Aviation Solutions LLC intends to do business as (dba) High Above Aerial Imaging. Please amend our request accordingly. Thank you for your consideration of these important requests. Please advise us of any additional information that may be required.

~ cerel

es ger £ ''GVodwide riation Solutions LLC

# Appendix 

# I
239.7602-2 Required storage of data within the United States or outlying areas. ( a ) Cloud computing service providers are required to maintain within the 50 states, the District of Columbia, or outlying areas of the United States, all Government data that is not physically located on DoD premises, unless otherwise authorized by the authorizing official, as described in DoD Instruction 8510.01, in accordance with the SRG.
( b ) The contracting officer shall provide written notification to the contractor when the contractor is permitted to maintain Government data at a location outside the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas of the United States. *See* PGI 239.7602-2 for additional guidance.
[80 FR 51743, Aug. 26, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 72999, Oct. 21, 2016; 86 FR 59871, Oct. 29, 2021]
EXHIBIT 32.2



                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard J. Moore , Chief Financial Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
          ended September 30, 2003 ("Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

     2.   All of the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
          of operations of the company.



Date: December 9, 2003                      /s/ Richard J. Moore
                                            --------------------
                                            Richard J. Moore
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended May 6, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, K. Scott Gray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 12, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ K. Scott Gray                                
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | K. Scott Gray                                    
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### RETTAGLIATTA, Appellant, v. HAYWARD et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by Anna P. Rettagliatta, as administratrix, against Thomas J. Hayward and others.

J. E. Judge, for appellant.

Joseph N. Tuttle, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of Gmaehle v. Rosenberg, 83 App. Div. 339, 82 App. Div. 366.
');
	document.write('

- **FIPSE Evaluation Resources**

## Other Resources

- Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) - Applicant and Grantee Resources

FIPSE Home
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7658

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANDRE YOUNGBLOOD, a/k/a Michael S. Long, a/k/a Michael Johnson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00308-RMG-1)

Submitted: April 26, 2022 Decided: June 2, 2022

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Senior Judge Floyd dissents.

Andre Youngblood, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7658 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/02/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

In December 2020, the district court denied Andre Youngblood’s motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We vacated that judgment and 

remanded for further proceedings. United States v. Youngblood, 858 F. App’x 96 

(4th Cir. 2021) (No. 20-7836). On remand, the district court denied Youngblood’s motion 

again, concluding that he had failed to demonstrate extraordinary and compelling reasons 

for compassionate release and that, in any event, the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors counseled 

against a sentence reduction. On appeal, Youngblood challenges only the district court’s 

analysis of the § 3553(a) factors.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 

4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Youngblood’s informal brief does not challenge the district 

court’s conclusion that he failed to demonstrate extraordinary and compelling reasons for 

compassionate release, Youngblood has forfeited appellate review of this dispositive 

ruling. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is 

an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues 

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7658 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/02/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

FLOYD, Senior Judge, dissenting:

Upon review of the record and the informal brief, I respectfully dissent and would 

vacate the district court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7658 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/02/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
March 12, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of the Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International Airport, I am writing to express 

our strong support for the application of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop service between 

Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many 

corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. With service eight times 

daily between Kalamazoo and Detroit Metro Airport, our businesses could benefit from 

convenient connections to Tokyo's Haneda airport, and we feel our community would be 

in a strong position to build greater relationships between our businesses and Japanese 

businesses if this service was granted. Our business travelers look to the convenience of 

flying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support 

trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, 

fulfilling the commitment J)elta made to the Detroit Metro Airport to make it the airlines 

gateway to Asia. The addition of Haneda as a destination is a natural fit that would 

clearly benefit our business travelers. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Clifton^. Moshoginis, CM 

Airport Director 

KALAMAZOO/BATTLE CREEK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 

{ 5235 Portage Road • Kalamazoo, Ml 49002 • 269.388.3668 • www.azoairport.com