alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017309EN.01000101.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 309/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 300, 11.9.2017

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 293, 4.9.2017

OJ C 283, 28.8.2017

OJ C 277, 21.8.2017

OJ C 269, 14.8.2017

OJ C 256, 7.8.2017

OJ C 249, 31.7.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
ex10-19.htm


    Exhibit
10.19

     

     

    

     

    August
20, 2009

    


    


    CAPERSIA
PTE LTD

    96A Club
Street

    Singapore

    


    


    Attention:
Richard Wilson

    


    Dear
Richard,

    


    Re:
Promissory Note Dated June 1, 2007 – 3rd
Amendment and Conversion

    


    With
reference to the Promissory Note as executed by the Company on June 1, 2007 as
amended on December 28, 2007 and November 7, 2008 (the Note). The parties to the
Note, Velocity Oil & Gas, Inc as the Maker and Capersia Pte Ltd as the Payee
hereby confirm their agreement to further amend the Note.

    


    In the
First Amendment the Payee has agreed to provide Velocity with at least twelve
months and one day notice before repayment is due. In the Second Amendment the
Principal amount of the Note was increased to $12,764 (Twelve Thousand Seven
Hundred Sixty Four United States Dollars).

    


    This
3rd
Amendment documents the agreement between the Parties to the Note to change the
conversion price of the Note to the par value ($0.001) of the common shares and
election by Capersia to convert US$1,000 to one million common
shares.

    


    


    As
executed by the Parties on the day first mentioned above.

    


    


    


    


    


    
      	
              /s/
      Frank Jacobs

            	
              /s/
      Richard Wilson

            
	
              Frank
      Jacobs

            	
              Richard
      Wilson

            
	
              Director
      and Company Secretary

            	
              Director
EXHIBIT 31.1

                     RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION

I, Yanbia Bai, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cybrdi, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for
the issuer and have:

      a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

      b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c. Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal
   quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
   that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
   the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
   control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
   affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
   financial information; and

      b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over
   financial reporting.

May 21, 2007
                                            By: /s/ Yanbiao Bai
                                                ---------------
                                            Yanbiao Bai,
                                            CEO, Principal Executive Officer and
                                            President
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-40261

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Mikedrion Lister, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:21-CR-539-1

______________________________

Before Barksdale, Engelhardt, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The district court revoked Mikedrion Lister’s term of probation and 

sentenced him to 18-months’ imprisonment. Lister contends—and the 

Government agrees—that the written revocation judgment contains a 

clerical error. Lister and the Government seek a remand for correction of the 

judgment under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 3, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-40261 Document: 00516956115 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023
No. 23-40261

2

Rule 36 states: “After giving any notice it considers appropriate, the 

court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other 

part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or 

omission”. Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. This rule applies “[w]here the record 

makes it clear that an issue was actually litigated and decided but was 

incorrectly recorded in or inadvertently omitted from the judgment”. United 

States v. Cooper, 979 F.3d 1084, 1089 (5th Cir. 2020) (citation omitted). 

The district court’s written judgment contains a clerical error. At the 

revocation hearing, the court explicitly found, inter alia, that the Government 

failed to “establish” Lister violated the terms of his supervision by 

possessing or using a controlled substance. Nevertheless, the written 

judgment states Lister was found guilty of violating the condition prohibiting 

possessing or using a controlled substance (“Violation Number 1” in the 

written judgment). In other words, the written judgment “incorrectly 

recorded” how the controlled-substance violation was resolved at the 

revocation hearing. Id. (citation omitted). Accordingly, the clerical error in 

the written judgment is subject to correction under Rule 36. 

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the clerical error in the 

judgment.

Case: 23-40261 Document: 00516956115 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/03/2023
3.704 Policy. ( a ) In cases in which there is a final conviction for any violation of 18 U.S.C. 201-224 involving or relating to contracts awarded by an agency, the agency head or designee shall consider the facts available and, if appropriate, may declare void and rescind contracts, and recover the amounts expended and property transferred by the agency in accordance with the policies and procedures of this subpart.
( b ) Since a final conviction under 18 U.S.C. 201-224 relating to a contract also may justify the conclusion that the party involved is not presently responsible, the agency should consider initiating debarment proceedings in accordance with subpart 9.4, Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility, if debarment has not been initiated or is not in effect at the time the final conviction is entered.
( c ) If there is a final conviction for an offense punishable under 41 U.S.C. 2105, or if the head of the agency, or designee, has determined, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the contractor or someone acting for the contractor has engaged in conduct constituting such an offense, then the head of the contracting activity shall consider, in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law or regulation— ( 1 ) Declaring void and rescinding contracts, as appropriate, and recovering the amounts expended under the contracts by using the procedures at 3.705 (see 3.104-7); and
( 2 ) Recommending the initiation of suspension or debarment proceedings in accordance with subpart 9.4.
[51 FR 27116, July 29, 1986, as amended at 62 FR 232, Jan. 2, 1997; 67 FR 13063, Mar. 20, 2002; 79 FR 24197, Apr. 29, 2014]
## FY 2023

No awards.

## FY 2022

Appropriation: $1,264,988New Fellowships: 21Average Fellowship Award: $60,238

## FY 2011 - 2016

No awards.

IFLE Home
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-0393

Filed October 1, 2014

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JUSTIN M. RAYMOND,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, James D. Coil, 

District Associate Judge.

A defendant appeals his judgment and sentence. AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Stephan J. Japuntich, 

Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Tyler J. Buller, Assistant Attorney 

General, Lily Dobson, Student Legal Intern, Thomas J. Ferguson, County 

Attorney, and Michelle Wagner, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Doyle and McDonald, JJ.
2

VAITHESWARAN, P.J.

Justin Raymond pled guilty to domestic abuse assault-strangulation, in 

violation of Iowa Code section 708.2A(2)(d) (2013). The district court sentenced 

Raymond to a prison term not exceeding two years, with all but seven days 

suspended. On appeal, Raymond contends the court abused its discretion in 

declining to grant his request for a deferred judgment. 

The district court is not required “to specifically acknowledge each claim of 

mitigation urged by a defendant.” State v. Boltz, 542 N.W.2d 9, 11 (Iowa Ct. 

App. 1995). “Even a succinct and terse statement of reasons may be sufficient 

as long as the brevity displayed does not prevent us from reviewing the exercise 

of the trial court’s sentencing discretion.” Id.

The district court gave the following reasons for Raymond’s sentence:

Well, Mr. Raymond, I do believe that the sentence is appropriate 

based upon the nature and circumstances of this offense as well as 

you as an offender. I think you — it's to your credit certainly, Mr. 

Raymond, that you have gone through substance abuse treatment. 

I've reviewed the letter . . . from Pathways Behavioral Services. I 

think that . . . certainly shows that . . . you are committed to getting 

some substance abuse treatment and following up hopefully with 

your mental health treatment as well.

The court essentially accepted the State’s prior assertion that the serious nature 

of this offense militated against a deferred judgment. See Boltz, 542 N.W.2d at 

11 (“[I]t is apparent the sentencing court’s general reasons related to the more 

specific reasons previously articulated by the attorneys.”). The district court’s 

decision to weigh this factor more heavily than Raymond’s efforts at rehabilitation

was not clearly untenable or unreasonable and, accordingly, did not evince an 

abuse of discretion. Id. 
3

We affirm Raymond’s sentence. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company),
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)  The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(4)  The information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/    Paul R. Flanders


---

Paul R. Flanders


Vice President 
Finance (Chief Financial Officer)


August 14, 2002


|
|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,557
<SECURITIES>                                       254
<RECEIVABLES>                                      273
<ALLOWANCES>                                        46
<INVENTORY>                                        983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,903
<PP&E>                                             950
<DEPRECIATION>                                     810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           312
<OTHER-SE>                                       (258)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,329
<SALES>                                            633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   623
<CGS>                                              492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (140)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
26.603 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Driving* — ( 1 ) Means operating a motor vehicle on an active roadway with the motor running, including while temporarily stationary because of traffic, a traffic light, stop sign, or otherwise.
( 2 ) Does not include operating a motor vehicle with or without the motor running when one has pulled over to the side of, or off, an active roadway and has halted in a location where one can safely remain stationary.
*Text messaging* means reading from or entering data into any handheld or other electronic device, including for the purpose of short message service texting, e-mailing, instant messaging, obtaining navigational information, or engaging in any other form of electronic data retrieval or electronic data communication. The term does not include glancing at or listening to a navigational device that is secured in a commercially designed holder affixed to the vehicle, provided that the destination and route are programmed into the device either before driving or while stopped in a location off the roadway where it is safe and legal to park.
# C_2018189EN.01001701.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/17

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 June 2018

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 June 2018

(2018/C 189/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1669 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4441 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87680 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2943 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1531 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 122,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5323 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,827 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 319,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3162 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6650 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,3991 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5494 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5142 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1547 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6737 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5617 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 254,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8313 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4883 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3850 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 195,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6536 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,375 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,5972 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,376 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3681 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,2834 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,3140 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1669

JPY

Japanese yen

127,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4441

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87680

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2943

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1531

ISK

Iceland króna

122,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5323

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,827

HUF

Hungarian forint

319,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3162

RON

Romanian leu

4,6650

TRY

Turkish lira

5,3991

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5494

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5142

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1547

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6737

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5617

KRW

South Korean won

1 254,17

ZAR

South African rand

14,8313

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4883

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3850

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 195,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6536

PHP

Philippine peso

61,375

RUB

Russian rouble

72,5972

THB

Thai baht

37,376

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3681

MXN

Mexican peso

23,2834

INR

Indian rupee

78,3140

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
## Timeline

The FY 2023 competition for new International Research and Studies (IRS) awards is **now closed**. The Notice Inviting Applications (NIA) was published in the Federal Register on March 28, 2023. The deadline to apply was May 12, 2023.  The following information is for reference only.

## Federal Register Notice

- FY 2023 Notice Inviting Applications  |  PDF 

## Current Application

	Applications for the FY 2023 IRS competition were submitted through Grants.gov (Funding Opportunity Number: ED-GRANTS-032823-001).

- FY 2023 IRS Application Package:   MS Word  (444K)

## Application Technical Assistance

A FY 2023 IRS competition pre-application webinar was held on Tuesday, April 4, 2023. The webinar covered a variety of topics, including applicant eligibility, program requirements, and selection criteria.

- Webinar recording: https://youtu.be/I82Ndqiqe_I
- Click here for the FY 2023 IRS Pre-Application Webinar Slide Deck

## Application Contact

Dana Sapatoru, Ph.D.Program Officerdana.sapatoru@ed.gov1-202-987-1944International and Foreign Language EducationInternational Research and Studies Program (84.017)400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Washington, DC 20202

If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-377-8339.

IRS Home | IFLE Home | Discretionary Grant Application Packages
Exhibit 10.1


                 Rogers Corporation Compensation Recovery Policy

If the Board  determines  that any  Compensation  earned or paid to an Executive
Officer  resulted  from any  financial  result or operating  objective  that was
impacted by the  Misconduct,  the Board may recover from an  Executive  Officer,
directly or indirectly,  any  Compensation  it considers  appropriate  under the
circumstances.  In addition,  if the Board determines that an Executive  Officer
willfully  violates an  Employment  Obligation,  the Board may recover from that
Executive  Officer,  directly or indirectly,  any Compensation  that was earned,
vested or granted on or after such violation as it deems  appropriate  under the
circumstances.   The  Board  has  the  sole  discretion  to  make  any  and  all
determinations under this policy; provided,  however that the Board may delegate
its authority to a Board Committee to make some or all determinations under this
policy as it deems  appropriate  under the  circumstances.  Remedies  under this
policy are in addition  to, and not in lieu of, any other  relief  available  to
Rogers Corporation due to an Executive Officer's Misconduct or willful violation
of  an   Employment   Obligation,   including  but  not  limited  to  employment
termination.  This policy shall be effective  January 1, 2010,  and apply to any
Compensation that is initially granted or earned on or after that date.

For purposes of this  policy,  the  following  terms shall have the meanings set
forth below:

"Board" means the Board of Directors of Rogers Corporation.

"Board  Committee"  means any committee  consisting  of two or more  independent
directors (as determined under applicable  listing  requirements)  designated by
the Board to make any determination under this policy.

"Compensation"  means any  incentive  compensation  (such as payments  under the
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (AICP)),  equity award (such as stock options
and  performance-based  restricted  stock units) or other  compensation  paid or
payable  by  Rogers  Corporation  or its  subsidiaries  that  is  determined  by
reference to incentive compensation, an equity award or both (such as additional
accruals under the Pension Restoration Plan due to AICP payments).

"Employment  Obligation"  means any  material  obligation  under an  Employment,
Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement (or any similar type of agreement), as
determined by the Board.

"Executive Officer" means any current or former officer of Rogers Corporation or
any of its subsidiaries who has at any time been treated an executive officer of
Rogers Corporation for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

"Misconduct" means gross negligence, fraudulent behavior or illegal conduct. For
avoidance of doubt,  an  Executive  Officer's  Compensation  shall be subject to
recovery  under this  Policy  regardless  of who was  responsible  for the gross
negligence, fraudulent behavior or illegal conduct giving rise to any inaccurate
or erroneous financial result or operating objective.