alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Use the Fellow Search function on the International Resource Information System (IRIS) website for more information about DDRA fellows and their projects.

## Grantees and Award Information

## FY 2023

- FY 2023 DDRA Awards Summary:      MS Word  (74K)
- Google Map of FY 2023 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2022

- FY 2022 DDRA Awards Summary:      MS Word  (71K)
- Google Map of FY 2022 IFLE Grantees

## FY 2021

- FY 2021 DDRA Awards Summary:     MS Word  (78K)

## FY 2020

- FY 2020 DDRA Awards Summary:     MS Word  (78K)

## FY 2019

- Google Map of IFLE FY 2019 Grantees

## FY 2018

- Summary Data    PDF  (255K)
- Detailed Data    MS Word  (409K)

## FY 2017

- Summary Data    MS Word  (334K)
- Google Map of IFLE FY 2017 Grantees

## FY 2016

- Summary Data    MS Word  (322K)
- Google Map of IFLE FY 2016 GranteesFY 2015- Summary Data    MS Word  (271K)
- Google Map of FY 2015 DDRA Institutions and Fellows’ Research Locations
- Google Map of IFLE FY 2015 GranteesFY 2014- Summary Data    MS Word  (291K) |  PDF  (528K)
FY 2013- Summary Data    MS Excel  (126K) |  PDF  (347K)
IFLE Home  Last Modified: 11/15/2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0213 IN THE MATTER OF: L.S., A YOUTH. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 26 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 19 2024

03/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0213
#### 1852.243-73--1852.243-78 [Reserved]
2806.304 Approval of the justification. ( a ) Justifications for contract actions over the contracting officer's approval dollar threshold shall be submitted to the BPC for concurrence before being forwarded to the bureau Competition Advocate for approval.
( b ) Justifications requiring approval by the HCA, or a designee, shall be submitted to the {i} BPC and {ii} bureau Competition Advocate for concurrence before being forwarded to the HCA or designee.
( c ) Justifications requiring approval by the SPE shall be submitted to the {i} BPC, {ii} the bureau Competition Advocate, and {iii} the HCA for concurrence before being forwarded to the SPE for approval.
( d ) A class justification shall be approved in accordance with established bureau procedures and FAR 6.304(c).
C. A. No. 73-243.

#### State *v.*Arthur V. Fales.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *William G. Brody,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for petitioner. *Raymond J. Daniels,*for respondent.

Petition for reargument denied.
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

Gary Feinerman Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 4794 DATE 7/3/2012

CASE

TITLE

Ali vs. Obama, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

This case is dismissed as frivolous. Enter judgment order. Motion for appointment of counsel [4] is denied

without prejudice. Civil case closed.

O[ For further details see text below.]

Docketing to mail notices.

*Mail AO 450 form.

STATEMENT

The complaint alleges that the President of the United States, the First Lady of the United States, unnamed

White House staff, and "Shareholders of the White House" committed various wrongs against Plaintiff. 

Illustrative examples of the alleged wrongs are cyber-bullying; psy-ops; and utilizing passivity zaps, zombie

zaps, tired zaps, emotionless zaps and SSSS technology. Plaintiff seeks $100 million in damages. The

complaint is too frivolous to invoke the court's subject matter jurisdiction. See Blake-Bey v. Cook Cnty., 438

F. App'x 522 (7th Cir. 2011). The case therefore is dismissed; the court will not waste Plaintiff's or its own

time by requiring Plaintiff to file an in forma pauperis application or pay the $350 filing fee, and then

dismissing the suit on this ground.

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

JD

12C4794 Ali vs. Obama, et al. Page 1 of 1

Case: 1:12-cv-04794 Document #: 5 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:7
#### Richard Rider et al., Appellants, v. Nassau-Suffolk Funding Corp. et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for fraud in the sale of land and the house thereon, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 28, 1961 after a jury trial, upon the direction of the court at the close of their case, dismissing the com*559plaint on the merits as against both defendants and awarding costs to them. Judgment modified on the law by striking out the provision dismissing the complaint as against the defendant Chester Associates, Inc., and the provision awarding costs to said defendant; the action is severed as between the plaintiffs and said defendant; and a new trial is ordered between the plaintiffs and said defendant, with costs to abide the event. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to the defendant Nassau-Suffolk Funding Corp., payable by plaintiffs. In our opinion a prima facie case of actionable fraud on the part of defendant Chester Associates, Inc., was established and, hence, as to such defendant it was error to dismiss the complaint. However, the trial court properly dismissed the complaint as against the defendant Nassau-Suffolk Funding Corp., for failure of proof. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
28.103-1 General. ( a ) Generally, agencies shall not require performance and payment bonds for other than construction contracts. However, performance and payment bonds may be used as permitted in 28.103-2 and 28.103-3.
( b ) The contractor shall furnish all bonds before receiving a notice to proceed with the work.
( c ) No bond shall be required after the contract has been awarded if it was not specifically required in the contract, except as may be determined necessary for a contract modification.
# C_2017215EN.01005901.xml

| 5.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/59

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 July 2017

(2017/C 215/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1353 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4367 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87805 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6735 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0954 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4850 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,132 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,30 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2426 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5884 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0377 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4922 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4730 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8646 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5594 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5701 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 307,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,0182 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7220 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4165 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 174,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8790 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,343 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,3400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,617 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7503 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6761 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,4970 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1353

JPY

Japanese yen

128,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4367

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87805

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6735

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0954

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4850

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,132

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,30

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2426

RON

Romanian leu

4,5884

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0377

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4922

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4730

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8646

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5594

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5701

KRW

South Korean won

1 307,61

ZAR

South African rand

15,0182

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7220

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4165

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 174,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8790

PHP

Philippine peso

57,343

RUB

Russian rouble

67,3400

THB

Thai baht

38,617

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7503

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6761

INR

Indian rupee

73,4970

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 7. A Klein 5000 sidescan-sonar system hull-mounted to a       National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration launch. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig7.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:28:57 EDT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Philip Charvat

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05746

Honorable Andrea R. Wood

Travel Services, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, October 2, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland:Motions by Defendant

Royal Caribbean Cruise to Compel [213 & 214] are entered. A written response is

required and is due on 10/15/14 and replies, if any, are due on 10/22/14. The Court will

rule by mail. No court appearance is necessary on 10/27/14. The Court will conduct a

short discovery status on 10/28/14 at 9:30 AM or immediately following the status before

Judge Wood. Counsel should be prepared to report on Carnival's ESI production and

RMG's email production as well as report on other outstanding issues. The parties should

be prepared to set a date for the close of fact discovery. Mailed notice(gel, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 218 Filed: 10/02/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3794
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
        connection with the Annual Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-K/A for the year ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Trevino, Jr.,
        the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/    Alex
                  Trevino, Jr.Alex
                  Trevino, Jr.Chief
                  Executive OfficerMay
                  30, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be
      retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Date: January 21, 2015

On January 21, 2015, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and Acting Assistant Administrator for 

Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe, met with Mr. Greg Abel of Berkshire Hathaway. Mr. Able 

discussed Berkshire Hathaway’s comments on the 111(d) Clean Power Plan (see Dockets EPAHQ-OAR-2013-0602, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495) and offered 

preliminary thoughts on the Agency’s November 25, 2015, proposed revisions to the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone.
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE
October 13, 2015 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RODNEY STEPHENS

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Campbell County No. 15070 E. Shayne Sexton, Judge

No. E2014

- 02514

- CCA

- R3

- CD

– Filed January 6, 2016



### _____________________________

T IMOTHY L. E ASTER , J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent with the conclusions of the majority that a rational trier of fact could not conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant possessed the culpable

mental state o f knowingly violating an order of protection. On direct examination, Defendant acknowledged that he was served “with something” w hen he left the jail. On

cross

- examination, Defendant admitted that he knew that there was an order telling him

not to have c ontact with his wife when he left the jail. He acknowledged that somebody had given him a copy of the order and he showed it to the officer who stopped him a few

minutes later. Finally, he agreed with the State that he was not “trying to tell the folks o f the jury that [he] didn’t know that [he was] not allowed to have contact with [Ms. Stephens]” and he knew that there was an order of protection.

When viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, as we must on an appeal of a state’s successful conviction, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential element of Defendant’s knowledge. Such a conclusion was established, at a

minim um, by constructive knowledge (he was told of the order) or at most, by actual knowledge (he was served with a copy of the order). Either way, the record provides sufficient evidence of Defendant’s knowledge of the order’s existence and thus the mens

rea to knowingly violate the order. I would, therefore, affirm Defendant’s conviction of aggravated stalking in full.

___________________________ TIMOTHY L. EASTER, JUDGE
#### 252.217-7008 Bonds.

As prescribed in 217.7104(a), use the following clause:

# Bonds (DEC 1991)

(a) If the solicitation requires an offeror to submit a bid bond, the Offeror may furnish, instead, an annual bid bond (or evidence thereof) or an annual performance and payment bond (or evidence thereof).

(b) If the solicitation does not require a bid bond, the Offeror shall not include in the price any contingency to cover the premium of such a bond.

(c) Even if the solicitation does not require bonds, the Contracting Officer may nevertheless require a performance and payment bond, in form, amount, and with a surety acceptable to the Contracting Officer. Where performance and payment bond is required, the offer price shall be increased upon the award of the job order in an amount not to exceed the premium of a corporate surety bond.

(d) If any surety upon any bond furnished in connection with a job order under this agreement fails to submit requested reports as to its financial condition or otherwise becomes unacceptable to the Government, the Contracting Officer may require the Contractor to furnish whatever additional security the Contracting Officer determines necessary to protect the interests of the Government and of persons supplying labor or materials in the performance of the work contemplated under the Master Agreement.

(End of clause)
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 20 / Tuesday, February 2, 2021 / Presidential Documents 7789 

Presidential Determination No. 2021–03 of January 14, 2021 

Presidential Determination on the Pursuant to Section 

1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for FY 2012 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the Treasury[, 

and] the Secretary of Energy 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, after carefully considering the reports submitted 

to the Congress by the Energy Information Administration including the 

report submitted in October 2020, and other relevant factors, including global 

economic conditions, increased oil production by certain countries, the level 

of spare capacity, and the availability of strategic reserves, I determine, 

pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public Law 112–81, and consistent with 

prior determinations, that there is a sufficient supply of petroleum and 

petroleum products from countries other than Iran to permit a significant 

reduction in the volume of petroleum and petroleum products purchased 

from Iran by or through foreign financial institutions. 

I will continue to monitor this situation closely. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 14, 2021 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_MEMO1Trump.EPS</GPH>
7790 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 20 / Tuesday, February 2, 2021 / Presidential Documents 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_MEMO1ED02FE21.000</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 20 / Tuesday, February 2, 2021 / Presidential Documents 7791 

[FR Doc. 2021–02251 

2–1–21; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–C 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with FR_MEMO1ED02FE21.001</GPH>
#### James Wear, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Jockey Club, Appellant.

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a window cleaner in the employ of an independent contractor at the defendant’s race track, as the result of the crumbling of a piece of wooden molding (called a water break or water stop) near the edge of a canopy or roof, when plaintiff stepped upon such molding, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 19, 1961 after trial, upon the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Uglietta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### Ruth E. Stattler, appellee, v. Wilbur P. Stattler, appellant. Ruth E. Stattler, defendant in error, v. Wilbur P. Stattler, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 7,633.

Gen. No. 7,628.

Bill for divorce. Decree for complainant. Appeal from Circuit Court of Carroll county in Gen. No. 7,633; error to the Circuit Court of Garroll county in Gen. No. 7,628; the Hon. William J. Emmerson, Judge, presiding, in Gen. No. 7,633; the Hon. Harry E. Edwards, Judge, presiding, in Gen. No. 7,628. Heard in this court at the April term, 1926.

Decree affirmed and order denying petition to vacate decree affirmed.

Opinion filed September 25, 1926.

Sims, Welch, Godman *So*Stransky, for appellant and plaintiff in error; F. J. Stransky, of counsel.

Chas. E. Stuart, for appellee and defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01384]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules, Revised notice of open 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules will hold a virtual 
meeting on May 11, 2021. The meeting is open to the public. When a 
meeting is held virtually, members of the public may join by telephone 
or video conference to observe but not participate. An agenda and 
supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the 
meeting at: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books. The announcement for this 
meeting was previously published in 86 FR 3195.

DATES: May 11, 2021, 10 a.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, 
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference 
of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One 
Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-
1820, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b391e070e1828040606021f1f0e0e34380e08190e1f0a19122b0a04451e1808041e191f18450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2a0879e9781b19d9f9f9b86869797ada1979180978693808bb2939ddc8781919d87808681dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.

    Dated: January 14, 2021.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-01384 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
228.305 Overseas workers' compensation and war-hazard insurance. ( d ) When submitting requests for waiver, follow the procedures at PGI 228.305(d).
[69 FR 65091, Nov. 10, 2004]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Cascade Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/ROBERT C. WARREN, JR.Robert C. Warren, Jr. Chief Executive OfficerJune 9, 2004 |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|/s/RICHARD S. ANDERSONRichard S. Anderson Chief Financial OfficerJune 9, 2004     |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks