alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
View the archived webinar from Wednesday, February 12, 2020.  This webinar provides additional CLSD Program Information and is intended to support State Educational Agencies (SEAs) interested in receiving a future CLSD program grant award.

CALL FOR PEER REVIEWERS – Comprehensive Literacy State Development ProgramFY 2020 U.S. Department of Education Discretionary Grant Competition

**Program Office:**Office of Well Rounded Education Programs 

**CFDA Number:** 84.371C 

**Program Type:** Discretionary Grants and Set-Aside Grants for the Secretary of the Interior for such a program at schools funded by the Bureau of Indian Education and four Outlying Areas – American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Mariana Islands, Guam and the Virgin Islands. 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS 

The Comprehensive Literacy State Development (CLSD) program is authorized under Sections 2222-2225 of the ESEA. The purpose of the CLSD discretionary grants is to create a comprehensive literacy program to advance literacy skills, including pre- literacy skills, reading, and writing, for children from birth through grade 12, with an emphasis on disadvantaged children, including children living in poverty, English learners, and children with disabilities.
Chart 25641HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       25641          Edition:       27          Edition       Date: January       2004          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/29/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
#### H. D. S. Mercantile Corp. v. Monet Fashions, Inc., et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS CAP,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 15-70584

Agency No. A095-790-261

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2016** 

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Cap, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

JUN 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597

F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Cap’s motion to reopen as

untimely, where the motion was filed more than a year after his final administrative

order of removal, and Cap failed to demonstrate materially changed country

conditions in Guatemala to qualify for the regulatory exception to the filing

deadline. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 998-990 (new

evidence lacked materiality).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 15-70584
#### 252.232-7014 [Reserved]
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-60408 Summary Calendar
MERSID MEHMEDI-AJVAZOSKA, Petitioner

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A077 800 462
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mersid Mehmedi-Ajvazoska, a native and citizen of Macedonia, petitions this court for review of an order from the Board o f Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his moti o n to reopen his removal proceedings and rescind the in absentia removal order i ssued against him. The Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss this petition on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D May30 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-60408 Document: 00511871222 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2012No. 11-60408

There i s n o dispute that Mehmedi-Ajvazoska’s motion to reopen, which

was his second motion to reopen, was not filed within 180 days after the date of the order of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b ) ( 4) (i i). In that motion to reopen, Mehmedi-Ajvaz o s k a s o ught equitable tolling based upon ineffectiv e a s s i s t a nce of counsel. “[A] request for equitable tolling of a time- or number-barred motion to reopen on the basis of ineffective assistance

o f c o u n s e l is in essence an argument that the BIA should have exercised i t s discretion to reopen the proceedi n g sua sponte based upon the doctrine of equitable tolling.” Ramos-Bonilla v. Mukasey , 543 F.3d 216, 220 (5th Cir. 2008). We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision whether t o exercise its discretion to reopen a proceeding sua sponte. Id. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the petition for review is DISMISSED.

2 Case: 11-60408 Document: 00511871222 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2012
#### 2924.103 Procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             239
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                      652
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                        445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,453
<PP&E>                                          10,936<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              855
<BONDS>                                          3,074
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,710
<SALES>                                          2,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,951
<CGS>                                            2,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     68
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 51
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        51
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.53
<FN>
<F1>Includes timber and timberlands.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### 252.215-7003 Requirement for Submission of Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data—Canadian Commercial Corporation.

As prescribed at 215.408(2)(i), use the following provision:

# Requirement for Submission of Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data—Canadian Commercial Corporation (JUL 2012)

(a) Submission of certified cost or pricing data is not required.

(b) Canadian Commercial Corporation shall obtain and provide the following:

(i) Profit rate or fee (as applicable).

(ii) Analysis provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada to the Canadian Commercial Corporation to determine a fair and reasonable price (comparable to the analysis required at FAR 15.404-1).

(iii) Data other than certified cost or pricing data necessary to permit a determination by the U.S. Contracting Officer that the proposed price is fair and reasonable [*U.S. Contracting Officer to insert description of the data required in accordance with FAR 15.403-3(a)(1)*].

(c) As specified in FAR 15.403-3(a)(4), an offeror who does not comply with a requirement to submit data that the U.S. Contracting Officer has deemed necessary to determine price reasonableness or cost realism is ineligible for award unless the head of the contracting activity determines that it is in the best interest of the Government to make the award to that offeror.

(End of provision)

[77 FR 43473, July 24, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 65217, Oct. 31, 2013; 83 FR 30825, June 29, 2018]
#### 2452.203-70 Prohibition against the use of Federal employees.

As prescribed in 2403.670, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts:

### PROHIBITION AGAINST THE USE OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES (APR 2019)

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation 3.601, contracts are not to be awarded to Federal employees or a business concern or other organization owned or substantially owned or controlled by one or more Federal employees. For the purposes of this contract, this prohibition against the use of Federal employees includes any work performed by the Contractor or any of its employees, subcontractors, or consultants.

(End of clause)

[84 FR 15130, Apr. 15, 2019]
Exhibit A

Case: 1:12-cv-04329 Document #: 22-1 Filed: 07/29/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:123
Case: 1:12-cv-04329 Document #: 22-1 Filed: 07/29/13 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:124
Case: 1:12-cv-04329 Document #: 22-1 Filed: 07/29/13 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:125
Case: 1:12-cv-04329 Document #: 22-1 Filed: 07/29/13 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:126
Case: 1:12-cv-04329 Document #: 22-1 Filed: 07/29/13 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:127
Case: 1:12-cv-04329 Document #: 22-1 Filed: 07/29/13 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:128
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00264-CV

CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, Appellant

V.

NORTHWEST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, JOSH WRIGHT, MARK 

SCHLUTER, STEVE SPROWLS, JUDY 

COPP, ANN DAVIS-SIMPSON, LILLIAN 

RAUCH, AND RYDER WARREN, IN 

THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES ONLY,

Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 141st District 

Court

of Tarrant County (141-210251-05)

July 1, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Chief 

Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to specifically state 

that the referenced Bates-stamped pages are attached to the judgment. We have 

attached those pages to this opinion as Exhibit B. We further modify the judgment to 

correct a typographical error by deleting the italicized portion of the judgment and 

replacing that paragraph with the following paragraph:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED[,] AND DECREED that 

it is equitable and just under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 37.009 

that Defendants be awarded their reasonable and necessary attorneys’

fees and costs incurred in this matter as follows, with all attorneys’ fees

and costs being taxed to Plaintiff: . . . .

It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.

It is further ordered that appellant Carroll Independent School District shall 

pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth________________

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
The Honorable John Boehner
  Chairman
  Committee on Education and the Workforce
  The U.S. House of Representatives
  Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Chairman Boehner:

Thank you for your efforts to end excessive special allowance payments to 
  certain lenders under the Federal Family Education Loan Program. Recently, these 
  unnecessary payments, which are made pursuant to a regulatory interpretation 
  by the prior administration, have increased significantly.

The prior administration's interpretation expressly permitted lenders to extend 
  these payments indefinitely. That interpretation runs counter to the clear intent 
  of Congress and the policy of the present Administration. The President proposed 
  to correct this issue in his fiscal year 2005 Budget and direct the savings 
  to benefit students and teachers.

The most direct and expeditious path to close this loophole is through legislation. 
  Because the current Higher Education Act (HEA) provisions that govern rulemaking 
  prevent the Secretary of Education from immediately stopping these payments, 
  the Administration urges the Congress to enact legislation closing this loophole 
  without delay.

We stand ready to work with the Congress to achieve this goal. Thank you again 
  for your leadership on this important issue.

Sincerely,

|/s/                                    | /s/                                                             
|-------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Rod Paige
      Secretary of Education | Joshua B. Bolten
      Director, Office of Management and Budget



Identical letter sent to The Honorable Judd Gregg

|Last Modified: 09/30/2004
|-------------------------
Exhibit 99.2

Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  By  Principal Executive Officer Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act FilingsDatedNovember 15, 2002

In
accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Anahita Villafane, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Creative Computer Applications, Inc. a California
Corporation ("Company"), hereby certify that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended August 31 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the annual report on Form 10KSB for the period ended August 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement as of the date first written above.

| |  |                                                                              
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                                              
| |  | /s/ANAHITA VILLAFANEAnahita Villafane Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer

---

QuickLinks
- Home
      - About
      - People
      - Programs
      - Funding
      - Policy
      - **Products** 
      - Resources
      - Contact

OSERS, through its many programs, projects and activities, develops a wide range of publications, information products, research and statistics.

### **OSEP**

        - OSEP Publications & Products
        - OSEP Research & Statistics

### **RSA**

        - RSA Data
        - RSA Annual Reports to Congress
        - WIOA Annual Reports (VR Program)
        - Monitoring Reports (VR Program)

### OSERS Navigation

About OSERS | People and Offices | Programs and ProjectsGrants and Funding | Legislation and Policy | Publications, Products, Research and StatisticsAdditional Resources | Contact and Feedback
**EXHIBIT 23**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
     We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-100340) of International Lease Finance Corporation(the “Company”) and in the related Prospectus of ourreport dated March 13, 2003, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule, whichappear in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2002. We also consent to thereference to us under the heading “Experts” in suchRegistration Statement.
                                                PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP
Los Angeles, CaliforniaMarch 20, 2003
#### 252.231-7000 Supplemental cost principles.

As prescribed in 231.100-70, use the following clause:

# Supplemental Cost Principles (DEC 1991)

When the allowability of costs under this contract is determined in accordance with part 31 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), allowability shall also be determined in accordance with part 231 of the Defense FAR Supplement, in effect on the date of this contract.

(End of clause)
Case: 1:12-cv-05017 Document #: 12 Filed: 06/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:52
2952.232-71 Submission of Invoices. As prescribed in 2932.908, insert the following clause: Submission of Invoices (AUG 2019) (a) Electronic Invoice Submittal Invoices for the services/goods provided under this award shall be submitted through the Department of Treasury's Invoice Processing Platform (IPP) or through the DOL Quickpay email system, as directed by the Contracting Officer. IPP is a Federal Government owned and operated website accessible to contractors free of charge. Information about IPP, including enrollment instructions, are available and should be obtained by the enrolled contractors directly from the Department of Treasury after award at *https://www.ipp.gov .* (1) The following instructions apply to Invoices submitted through *IPP.Gov* or the DOL Quickpay email system: (i) IPP invoice attachments SHALL NOT exceed the size limit of 10 megabytes (MB) each. However, you may submit multiple attachments of less than 10MB each with the invoices. (ii) DO NOT submit an invoice or attachment that uses shading or color. (b) An emailed Portable Document Format (PDF) image cannot have any text that has a background with any color other than white. If the image has a shaded background, it will be converted to black, and the text will be illegible. (c) An emailed Tagged Image File Format (TIFF) image must be black and white. (1) Quickpay users SHALL provide a copy of the invoice and any attachments via email to the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR, at the address specified in the contract. (2) Quickpay users SHALL NOT submit more than one attachment per invoice and the attachment shall not exceed 10MB. Any additional attachments will not be recognized. (3) DO NOT submit more than one invoice at a time. (4) DO NOT attempt to use the “Recall” or “Resend” email message features. (d) Electronic invoices shall be in PDF or TIFF format. (e) Paper Invoices shall be submitted via fax or U.S. mail Paper invoices may be sent via fax to: (202) 693-2862. Mail paper invoices to: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Financial Management Operations Division of Client Accounting, Services Room S-5526, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210. (f) General Information. Payment due date is to be calculated from the date the invoice is received in accordance with FAR 32.905 and the instructions above. Inquiries regarding invoices must be emailed to *OCFOinvoiceinquiries@dol.gov .* The relevant invoice must be attached to the inquiry email and the subject line of the email must state “INQUIRY”, as shown in the following example: INQUIRY: Contractor Name, DOL Agency, Contract Number, BPA Call or Order Number, Invoice Number, Invoice Amount The contractor SHALL NOT use the DOL electronic invoicing email address for inquiries about any invoice. *Questions:* All questions regarding Electronic Invoicing shall be sent to the DOL Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) at *OCFOinvoiceinquiries@dol.gov .*
(End of Clause)
# C_2016415EN.01000302.xml

| 11.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 415/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 415/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8219 — CD&R/Drive DeVilbiss Healthcare)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 415/03)

On 27 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8219. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8219. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.H., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.K., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 571 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.