alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1







Exhibit 10.1



NOTE




	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	October 13, 2009
	Maker:

	 	Claimsnet.com, Inc.
	Payee:

	 	Thomas Michel
	Place for Payment:

	 	14860 Montfort Dr., Suite 250, Dallas, TX 75254
	Principal Amount:

	 	Thirty Thousand U.S. dollars (USD$30,000.00)






Annual Interest Rate on Unpaid Principal from Date of Funding: Three percent (3%)



Terms of Payment: Principal and interest shall be due and payable on demand, interest being
calculated on the unpaid principal balance to the date of each installment paid, and the payment
made credited first to the discharge of interest accrued and the balance to the reduction of the
principal. Accrued and unpaid interest shall be computed on the basis of the actual days elapsed
in a year consisting of 365 days on the principal.



Annual Interest Rate on Demanded, Unpaid Amounts: The highest rate allowed by law.



Security for Payment: None



Maker promises to pay to the order of Payee at the place for payment and according to the
terms of payment the principal amount plus interest at the rates stated above. All unpaid amounts
shall be due upon demand.



On default in the payment of this note or in the performance of any obligation in any
instrument securing or collateral to it, this note and all obligations in all instruments securing
or collateral to it shall become immediately due at the election of Payee. Maker and each surety,
endorser, and guarantor waive all demands for payment, presentations for payment, notices of
intention to accelerate maturity, notices of acceleration of maturity, protest, and notices of
protest.



If this note or any instrument securing or collateral to it is given to an attorney for
collection or enforcement, or if suit is brought for collection or enforcement, or if it is
collected or enforced through probate, bankruptcy, or other judicial proceeding, then Maker shall
pay Payee reasonable attorney’s fees in addition to other amounts due. Reasonable attorney’s fees
shall be 10.0% of all amounts due unless either party pleads otherwise.



Nothing in this note shall authorize the collection of interest in excess of the highest rate
allowed by law.



Maker reserves the right to prepay the outstanding principal balance of this Note, in whole or
in part, at any time and from time to time, without premium or penalty. Any such pre-payment shall
be made together with payment of interest accrued on the amount of principal being prepaid through
the date of such prepayment, and shall be applied to the installments of principal due hereunder in
the inverse order of maturity.



Each Maker is responsible for the entire amount of this note.



The terms Maker and Payee and other nouns and pronouns include the plural if more than one.



Maker shall not be deemed to be in default of this note unless and until Maker shall have been
given seven (7) days written notice and opportunity to cure such default, via certified mail return
receipt requested.



Claimsnet.com, Inc.



By:  /s/ Don Crosbie



Don Crosbie, CEO



MAKER
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ZIMMER NEXGEN KNEE IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2272

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO−55)

On August 8, 2011, the Panel transferred 18 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See 802 F.Supp.2d 1374 (J.P.M.L. 2011). Since that time, 190 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Rebecca R Pallmeyer.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and assigned to

Judge Pallmeyer.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of August 8, 2011, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Rebecca R Pallmeyer.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

A TRUE COPY-ATTEST

THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK

 -

By: s/ ENJOLI FLETCHER

DEPUTY CLERK

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 -

March 30, 2012
IN RE: ZIMMER NEXGEN KNEE IMPLANT

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2272

SCHEDULE CTO−55 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ARIZONA

AZ 2 12−00541 Karlin et al v. Zimmer Incorporated et al

AZ 2 12−00542 Smith v. Zimmer Incorporated et al

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL

CAC 2 12−02029 Lawrence Forde v. Zimmer Inc et al

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 1 12−00364 Gonzales−Clayton et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al

OHIO NORTHERN

OHN 5 12−00549 Jones v. Zimmer, Inc. et al

OHN 5 12−00557 Strickfaden v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
Exhibit
10.2

    


    PROMISSORY
NOTE

    


    
      	
              $500,000

            	
              Santa
      Fe Springs, California

            
	 
      	
              October
      9, 2009

            


    

    


    FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,
New Century Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby
promises to pay to Michael Cabral, or order, the principal sum of $500,000 with
interest on the unpaid balance of such principal sum from the date hereof at the
rate of 5% per annum.  All amounts payable hereunder shall be due only
on and paid from the proceeds of an equity financing of the Company with gross
proceeds of at least $2,000,000 provided that the investors in such financing
permit the proceeds thereof to be used for such purpose.

    


    Payments of principal and interest
shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America at the principal
office of the payee or at such other place as the holder hereof shall have
designated to the Company in writing.

    


    This Note is subject to prepayment,
without penalty, at any time.

    


    If legal action is instituted by the
holder hereof to enforce this Note, the Company promises to pay holder's
reasonable attorneys' fees.

    


    
      	 
      	
              New
      Century Companies, Inc.

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              By:

            	
              /s/ David Duquette

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
              David
      Duquette, President
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael H. Goldberg

Michael H. GoldbergPresident and Chief Executive OfficerApril 28, 2010/s/ Scott F. Stephens

Scott F. StephensVice President and Chief Financial OfficerApril 28, 2010
   E-3
The Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act requires co-educational institutions of postsecondary education that participate in a Title IV, federal student financial  assistance program, and have an intercollegiate athletic program, to prepare an annual report to the Department of Education on athletic participation, staffing, and revenues and expenses, by men's and women's teams. 

**Equity in athletics data is now available on the Web at: http://ope.ed.gov/athletics**. This site provides data from thousands of colleges and universities in a convenient searchable form.

**Statute and Regulations**

The Higher Education Opportunity Act (Public Law 110-315) (HEOA) was enacted on August 14, 2008. This law reauthorizes and extends the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.  The Higher Education Act (HEA) provides the statutory authority for most of the programs and activities administered or conducted by the Office of Postsecondary Education, including requirements related to equity in athletics disclosure.

regulations

**Data Collection**

Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act Survey. This site is for institutions completing the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act survey.
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:2846
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:2847
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:2848
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:2849
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:2850
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:2851
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:2852
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:2853
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:2854
Case: 1:12-cr-00491 Document #: 353 Filed: 02/12/15 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:2855
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of the
Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, I, David
F. White, Controller of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.


                                        /S/ David F. White
                                            Controller (chief financial officer
                                             and principal accounting officer)
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C ARLOS C AP, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 15-70584 Age n c y No. A095-790-261 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. C arlos C a p, a native and c itiz e n of Gua te m a la , pe titions pro se

for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny i ng his m otion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e d ings. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for 

# FIL ED JUN 23 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

buse o f disc re tion the de n i a l of a m o tion to re ope n. N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion by

de ny ing C a

p’ s m otion to re ope n a s untim e l y , whe re the m otion wa s file d m ore tha n a y e ar a fte r his fina l a dm inistra tive orde r of re m ova l , a

nd C a p fa ile d to de m onstra

t e m ate ria lly

c ha nge d c ountry c onditions in Gua

te m a l a to qua lify for the re gula

tory e xc e ption to the

filing de a dline . Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(3)(ii); N ajmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 998-990 (ne w e vide nc e la c ke d m ate ria l ity ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 5 - 7 0 5 8 4 2
#### Maria Natal, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Carmen Garcia, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. Alex A. Alarid et al., Appellants.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff for $25,650, together with costs and disbursements, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff stipulates to accept $12,650 in lieu of the award by verdict in reduction of the judgment, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with costs to defendants-appellants. In this personal injury negligence action it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive in its award of damages, and that a verdict in excess of $12,650 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 19 (Monday, February 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee; Change

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting; change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register notice that was originally published 
on January 22, 2021, (Volume 86, Number 13, Page 6740) the time for 
this meeting has changed from 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time to 11:00 a.m. 
Eastern Time. All other meeting details remain the unchanged.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 
1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution 
Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 26, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-02007 Filed 1-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 464
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 34 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.34

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
    Commission relating to ``Protecting the Privacy of Customers of 
           Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
``Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other 
Telecommunications Services'' (81 Fed. Reg. 87274 (December 2, 2016)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### 252.229-7014 Full Exemption from Two-Percent Excise Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements.

As prescribed in 229.402-70(k), use the following clause:

# Full Exemption From Two-Percent Excise Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements (OCT 2022)

(a) As the Contractor represented in its offer, any item, including any item delivered under subcontract; any service; or any combination thereof delivered under this contract is fully exempt from the 2-percent excise tax withholding imposed by 26 U.S.C. 5000C and implemented by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.229-12, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements.

(b) If the full exemption no longer applies due to a change in circumstances during the performance of the contract, causing the Contractor to become subject to the withholding for the 2-percent excise tax as imposed by 26 U.S.C. 5000C, then the Contractor shall immediately comply with the notification and billing requirements of FAR clause 52.229-12.

(End of clause)

[87 FR 65517, Oct. 28, 2022]
FILED 9/3/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

DJ

Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 881 Filed: 09/03/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:51413
#### 2452.216-76 Minimum and maximum quantities or amounts for order.

As prescribed in 2416.506-70(b), insert the following clause:

# Minimum and Maximum Quantities or Amounts for Order (DEC 2012)

(a) The minimum quantity or amount to be ordered under this contract shall not be less than [*contracting officer insert quantity or amount*].

(b) The maximum quantity or amount to be ordered under this contract shall not exceed [*contracting officer insert quantity or amount*].

(End of clause)

[77 FR 73533, Dec. 10, 2012]
Exhibit 10.140
                      Assignment of Rancho Cucamonga Lease


                       ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE

     Agreement  dated this 1st day of December  1999 by and between (a) Play Co.
Toys & Entertainment Corp. ("Play Co."), a Delaware  corporation with offices at
550   Rancheros   Drive,   San   Marcos,   California   92069,   and  (b)   Toys
International.COM,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation  ("Toys")  with offices at 550
Rancheros Drive, San Marcos, California 92069.

     WHEREAS,  Landlord and Play Co.  heretofore  entered into a lease agreement
(the  "Lease")  dated the 20th day of February  1999 for the  premises  known as
Rancho Cucamonga,  located at 9950 W. Foothill Blvd., Suite U, Rancho Cucamonga,
California  91730 (the  "Premises"),  which  Lease  commenced  April 1, 1999 and
expires March 31, 2004; and

     WHEREAS,  Play Co.  desires to assign to Toys (i) all of the right,  title,
and interest to which Play Co.  otherwise  is entitled  under the Lease and (ii)
all duties and obligations by which Play Co. otherwise is bound under the Lease;
and

     WHEREAS,  Toys  desires  to accept  assignment  of Play  Co.'s  rights  and
entitlements  under the Lease and to assume the  liabilities  and obligations by
which Play Co. is bound under the Lease;

     NOW THEREFORE,  in  consideration of the mutual  promises,  covenants,  and
conditions set forth herein, it is agreed as follows:

     1. Play Co. hereby  expressly  and fully  transfers the Lease over and unto
Toys,  remaining liable thereunder to the extent provided under the terms of the
Lease.

     2. Toys hereby  accepts and assumes  all right,  title,  interest,  duties,
obligations, and liabilities under the Lease.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the above Agreement as
of the date set forth.



TOYS INTERNATIONAL.COM, INC.                 PLAY CO. TOYS & ENTERTAINMENT CORP.



By:      Richard Brady, President            By:      Richard Brady, President



By:      James B. Frakes, Secretary          By:      James B. Frakes, Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN OTERO, individually and )

on behalf of a class of similarly situated )

individuals, )

) 12 C 3148

Plaintiff, )

) Honorable Judge

vs. ) Amy J. St. Eve

)

THOMAS J. DART, et al. ) Magistrate Judge

) Michael T. Mason

Defendants. )

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THEIR CORRECT 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO INCLUDE INDIVIDUALS WHOSE 

CHARGES WERE VACATED WITHIN THE CLASS INSTANTER

NOW COME Defendants, Sheriff Thomas J. Dart and Cook County, by their 

attorney ANITA ALVAREZ, State's Attorney of Cook County, through her assistant, 

Anthony E. Zecchin, and states as follows:

1. Defendants are represented by undersigned counsel in the above-titled 

action.

2. Defendants timely filed a response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Include 

Individuals Whose Charges Were Vacated Within the Class on May 7, 

2015. Dkt. nos. 123-124. 

3. Upon reviewing the electronic entry of docket no. 123, undersigned 

counsel recognized that an earlier draft response had been filed rather than 

a final version.

4. Defendants are seeking leave to file their correct response instanter.

Case: 1:12-cv-03148 Document #: 125 Filed: 05/08/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1712
5. That the granting of this motion will not unfairly prejudice Plaintiff or 

unduly delay the litigation of this matter.

6. Defendants do not object to an one day extension of time for Plaintiff to 

file his reply.

WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Honorable Court grant the following 

relief:

a. That this Honorable Court grant Defendants leave to file their response 

instanter;

b. That this Honorable Court grants any other relief it deems just.

Respectfully submitted,

ANITA ALVAREZ

State’s Attorney of Cook County

/s/ Anthony E. Zecchin

Anthony E. Zecchin

Assistant State’s Attorney 

500 Richard J. Daley Center

50 W. Washington

Chicago, Illinois 60602

Case: 1:12-cv-03148 Document #: 125 Filed: 05/08/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1713
#### 208.7002-1 Acquiring department responsibilities.

See PGI 208.7002-1 for the acquiring department's responsibilities.

[71 FR 39004, July 11, 2006]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50331 

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HUGO ALEXANDER BERMUDES-CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:05-CR-652

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hugo Alexander

Bermudes-Cruz presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense, and by United States v. MendozaSanchez, 456 F.3d 479, 483 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that the

district court may use all facts admitted by the defendant in

determining whether the prior conviction qualifies as an

enumerated offense under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2. The Government’s
No. 06-50331

-2-

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.