alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017329EN.01001001.xml

| 30.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/10

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 329/07)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Belgium

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 200th anniversary of the Ghent University

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The inner part of the piece represents the logo of the Ghent University, with the dates 1817 - 2017 below, surrounded by the inscription 200 JAAR UNIVERSITEIT GENT – 200 YEARS GHENT UNIVERSITY and the country indication BE. The mintmark of Brussels, a helmeted head of the Archangel Michael and the mint directors’ mintmark, the coat of arms of the municipality Herzele, are located respectively on the right and left of the country indication.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 200 000 coins

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : September 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Chart 1117AHOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       1117A          Edition:       42          Edition       Date: March       2008          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/22/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
••.:;• RTMENT OF 

:-.--MSmRTAT10N 

•"•"::: CPERATiONS 

•r;;; f;'w - q P 3: 5 8 

August 2, 2011 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Associate Director, Small Community Program 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

W86-310 

Wasliington, D.C. 20590 

RE: City of Pikeville 

Small Community Air Service Development Grant Proposal 

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0119 

Dear IVIs. Ley, 

I am writing to support the above referenced Small Community Air Service Development grant proposal, 

submitted by the City of Pikeville. 

The Pikeville-Pike County Regional Airport (PBX) sits at the center of a 13 county region of 345,000 

people in Eastern Kentucky, Western Virginia and Southwestern West Virginia and is more than 100 

miles from the nearest commercial airport. The PBX Region is surrounded by one of America's most 

important energy producing regions and is ripe for additional economic, industrial and business growth. 

The introduction of scheduled passenger airline service will assist in creating thousands of new jobs. 

The successful award of a Small Community Air Service Development grant will significantly assist the 

City of Pikeville and its partners - the Pikeville-Pike County Airport Board and the Southeastern Kentucky 

Chamber of Commerce and its consultant in successfully recruiting a regional airline which will provide 

service to a major connecting hub. I am pleased to join my colleagues from throughout the region in 

recommending that the Department provide the SCASD grant to the City of Pikeville. 

Sincerely, 

3t:^)jj:^a)CA ^1 ^ NiLSil^x^
# C_2017117EN.01000101.xml

| 12.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8438 — Bollore Energy/TOTAL Marketing France/DRPC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 117/01)

On 6 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8438. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8438. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Ref: 8RA September 30 , 2013

**MEMORANDUM for RECORD**  **SUBJECT:** Phone call from Colleen Delaney , Utah DEQ, on Sept. 20, 2013 regarding our

proposed disapproval of the definition of Minor Source Baseline Date in the GHG Tailoring Rule. **FROM:** Jody

Ostendorf SIP Program Manager **TO:** Docket ID : EPA - R08 - OAR - 2012 - 0300 During this phone call, Colleen brought to my attention that a subsequent SIP submittal had removed the Minor Source Baseline Date definition that we had previously proposed to disapprove. We proposed to disapprove R307 - 405 - 3(2)(a)(i), consistent with our final action on July 15, 2011 (76 FR 41712), because it defines “Minor Source Baseline Date” in a manner inconsistent with the federal definition. However, Utah removed the Minor Source Baseline Date in a subsequent March 19, 2012 SIP submittal. Inour final action on that submittal, which was signed on Sept ember 30, 2013, we incorporated into the SIP the required definition for State programs at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(14): (ii) "Minor source baseline date" means the earliest date after the trigger d ate on which a major stationary source or a major modification subject to 40 CFR 52.21 or to regulations approved pursuant to 40 CFR 51.166 submits a complete application under the relevant regulations. The trigger date is: (A) In the case of PM 10 and s ulfur dioxide, August 7, 1977; **UNITED ST AT**  **ES ENVIRONMENT AL**  **PROTECTION A GENCY**  **REGION 8** 1595 Wy nkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202 - 1129 Phone 800 - 227 - 8917 http://www.epa.gov/region08(B) In the case of nitrogen dioxide, February 8, 1988; and

(C) In the case of PM 2.5 , October 20, 2011. Because we have re - established and incorporated into Utah’s SIP the required definition of Minor Source Baseline Date i n our Sept ember 30, 2013 final action, we do not need to act on it here.
#### Brause Realty, Inc., et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 15, 1978, unanimously reversed, in the exercise of discretion, and plaintiffs-appellants’ motion for permission to serve and file a supplemental complaint, to increase the *ad damnum*clause, and to transfer the case from Civil to Supreme Court granted, without costs and without disbursements. This, of course, is not a motion for summary judgment, and sufficient has been demonstrated at least prima facie in the exhibits found with the motion papers to indicate a causal relationship with defendant-respondent’s alleged negligence in maintenance of its water lines, claimed to have been the cause of the damage stated in the original complaint. Concur — Lane, J. P., Markewich, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|/s/    Alan Vituli                                                           
|Alan Vituli Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer August 11, 2004
## FY 2021

- New award(s):    PDF  (79K)
- Project Abstract(s):    PDF (186K)

FIPSE Home
#### PEOPLE ex rel. MASTEN, Respondent, v. MAXWELL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the relation of Minnie R. Masten, against Wil*1141liam H. Maxwell, as city superintendent of schools of the city of New York.

No opinion. Motion for resettlement granted, and order, as resettled, signed.
1609.7002 Minimum standards for Postal Service Health Benefits Carriers. ( a ) The carrier of a PSHB plan shall meet the minimum standards as described in 1609.7001.
( b ) To the greatest extent practicable, an FEHB Carrier (defined in 1602.170-1) that offers an FEHB plan (defined in 1602.170-9) in which the total enrollment includes 1,500 or more Postal Service employees or Postal Service annuitants in the contract year beginning January 2023 must offer a PSHB plan in the initial contract year. OPM may exempt a comprehensive medical plan, as described in 5 U.S.C. 8903(4), from the requirement in this paragraph (b).
[88 FR 20408, Apr. 6, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 43 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.43
                                       Agreed to August 28, 2018        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer the catafalque which is situated in the Exhibition Hall of the 
Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such 
catafalque may be used in connection with services to be conducted 
there for the Honorable John Sidney McCain, III, late a Senator from 
the State of Arizona and formerly a Representative from that State.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 3, 2022 No. 04-21-00525-CV IN THE INTEREST OF S.R.H, A CHILD From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA02064 Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellee’s brief was due February 7, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. We ordered appellee to file its brief, if any, by February 28, 2022. No brief was filed. Appellee now seeks leave to file a motion for an extension of time, citing office clerical error for its failure to file the brief in a timely manner. Accompanying its leave motion is a motion for an extension of time seeking a four-day extension to March 4, 2022. We grant appellee leave to file a motion for an extension of time and grant the motion for an extension of time. We order appellee to file its brief, if any, by March 4, 2022 . This is an accelerated appeal of an order in a suit for termination of the parent-child relationship that must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. See T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2. Because of the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, appellee is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. If the brief is not filed by the date ordered, we may submit the case without appellee’s brief.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of March, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register: October 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 202)]
[Notices]               
[Page 64776]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20oc10-113]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 334]

 
Delegation by the Secretary of State to the Assistant Secretary 
of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific 
Affairs To Notify Foreign Governments of Proposed Hazardous Waste 
Exports Under the Solid Waste Disposal Act

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the Assistant Secretary 
of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific 
Affairs, to the extent authorized by law, the authority to approve 
notifications to foreign governments of proposed exports from the 
United States of hazardous waste, as provided under Section 3017 of the 
Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6938.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, or the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and 
Resources, and the Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs may 
at any time exercise any authority or function delegated by this 
delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    September 28, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-26380 Filed 10-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 10.28

Oral Agreement with San-Mar Laboratories




San-Mar Laboratories, Inc. with a headquarters address at 4 Warehouse Lane, Elmsford, New York10523, has entered into an oral agreement with the Company and its subsidiary, Proteoderm, Inc., on January 2, 2009.

Pursuant to the oral agreement, San-Mar will use its extensive facilities which include cosmetics formulation, laboratories, clean rooms, ingredient compatibility testing facilities, printing, labeling, bottling, picking, packing and shipping areas and personnel,

The agreement will terminate four years after the first cosmeceutical kits are shipped.

The agreement provides that San-Mar will formulate cosmeceutical anti-aging kits for Proteonomix’ subsidiary Proteoderm. The kits consist of a day cream, night cream, cleanser, exfoliant and under eye serum. San-Mar will test the constituents of the kits for chemical compatibility and efficacy 

San-Mar, for certain customers of Proteoderm, will bottle, label and pack the kits in suitable containers and with labeling to conform to industry and regulatory standards – labels, bottles, packages all to be approved by the Company and by Proteoderm.

For other customers of Proteoderm, San-Mar will pack the kits in bulk in containers designated by the Company and Proteoderm.

San-Mar will ship to destinations and by shipping means as specified by the Company and Proteoderm.

San-Mar will set reasonable prices for its services. If at the end of each 90 day period, the Company and/or Proteoderm communicates to San-Mar that they have found better prices for the services San-Mar was rendering on their behalf from a provider of equal quality and the services being of at least equal quality, San-Mar has ten business days to match the prices of the competitor within 10% or the Company and Proteoderm may remove its business without penalty.

Each party will indemnify the other for damages, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, if the actions of one party (including the use of Proteoderm’s stem cell extract) causes liability to the other.

In the event of litigation between the parties, New York local law without regard to conflicts of laws principles will be applied and a court located in the City of New York or the County of Westchester will be used.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald E. Samuelson, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County, each imposed on April 19, 1978. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting therefrom the provision that they shall be served consecutively to each other and substituting therefor a provision that they shall be served concurrently. As so modified, sentences affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
225.871-4 Statutory waivers. ( a ) For contracts or subcontracts placed outside the United States, the Deputy Secretary of Defense may waive any provision of law that specifically prescribes— ( 1 ) Procedures for the formation of contracts;
( 2 ) Terms and conditions for inclusion in contracts;
( 3 ) Requirements or preferences for— ( i ) Goods grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States or in U.S. Government-owned facilities; or
( ii ) Services to be performed in the United States; or
( 4 ) Requirements regulating the performance of contracts.
( b ) There is no authority for waiver of— ( 1 ) Any provision of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751);
( 2 ) Any provision of 10 U.S.C. 3201-3205;
( 3 ) The cargo preference laws of the United States, including the Military Cargo Preference Act of 1904 (10 U.S.C. 2631) and the Cargo Preference Act of 1954 (46 U.S.C. 1241(b)); or
( 4 ) Any of the financial management responsibilities administered by the Secretary of the Treasury.
( c ) To request a waiver under a cooperative project, follow the procedures at PGI 225.871-4.
( d ) Obtain the approval of the Deputy Secretary of Defense before committing to make a waiver in an agreement or a contract.
[68 FR 15621, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 62565, Oct. 26, 2006; 87 FR 76993, Dec. 16, 2022]
242.1107 Contract clause. ( b ) When using the clause at FAR 52.242-2, include the following instructions in the contract schedule— ( i ) Frequency and timing of reporting (normally 5 working days after each reporting period);
( ii ) Contract line items, exhibits, or exhibit line items requiring reports;
( iii ) Offices (with addressees/codes) where reports should be sent (always include the contracting office and contract administration office); and
( iv ) The following requirements for report content— ( A ) The problem, actual or potential, and its cause;
( B ) Items and quantities affected;
( C ) When the delinquency started or will start;
( D ) Actions taken to overcome the delinquency;
( E ) Estimated recovery date; and/or
( F ) Proposed schedule revision.
Case: 1:12-cv-05751 Document #: 132-18 Filed: 02/10/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:3088
Case: 1:12-cv-05751 Document #: 132-18 Filed: 02/10/16 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:3089
Case: 1:12-cv-05751 Document #: 132-18 Filed: 02/10/16 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3090
Case: 1:12-cv-05751 Document #: 132-18 Filed: 02/10/16 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:3091
Case: 1:12-cv-05751 Document #: 132-18 Filed: 02/10/16 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:3092
## Timeline

This program  operates on a two-year grant cycle.

**Last competition: FY 2021****The FY 2021 application period is **now closed**. The deadline to apply was August 13, 2021.**

## Federal Register Notice

Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards dated June 24, 2021 | PDF

## Current Application

Applications  for FY 2021 were submitted online through Grants.gov before the application deadline of August 13, 2021.

## Tips and  Assistance

BIE Program Press Kit  –   PDF (7.97M) 

*For Reference only:*

Pre-Application Webinar information:  A pre-application webinar for the FY 2021 BIE program is now available to stream on YouTube: click here to watch the webinar on YouTube.

## Application Contact

Gary Thomas  Business and International Education (BIE) Program  U.S. Department of Education, OPE  International and Foreign Language Education  400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.  Washington, DC 20202

 

IFLE Home