alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 304 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that entrepreneurship on the part of 

minority women-owned businesses should be fully supported and encouraged. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 25, 2017 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Ms. HIRONO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that entrepreneurship 

on the part of minority women-owned businesses should 

be fully supported and encouraged. 

Whereas the number of women-owned small businesses increased by 3,500,000 from 2007 to 2016; 

Whereas, for every 10 women-owned businesses launched 

since 2007, 8 were started by women of color; 

Whereas women are now majority owners of 38 percent of all 

businesses in the United States; 

Whereas there are currently almost 5,000,000 minority 

women-owned small businesses; 

Whereas minority women are the fastest growing group of entrepreneurs in the United States; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 304 IS 

Whereas African-American women own fully 49 percent of all 

African-American-owned businesses; 

Whereas Latina-owned firms employ 550,400 workers; 

Whereas there are currently 922,700 Asian-American womenowned small businesses; 

Whereas Native American and Alaska Native women-owned 

small businesses generated $10,500,000,000 in revenues; 

and 

Whereas the number of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 

women-owned small businesses more than doubled between 2007 and 2016: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) October has been designated ‘‘National 

3 Women’s Small Business Month’’ by the Small Busi4 ness Administration; 

5 (2) minority women often work in low-paying 

6 jobs in the traditional workforce, which means the 

7 gender salary gap, child care expenses, and a lack of 

8 paid family leave impact women of color more se9 verely than other populations, and expanding access 

10 to opportunities for entrepreneurship can help 

11 women of color get ahead economically, serve their 

12 communities, and care for their families; 

13 (3) minority women entrepreneurs are paving 

14 the way for women-owned businesses; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 304 IS 

1 (4) minority women entrepreneurs are an im2 portant segment of the domestic economy of the 

3 United States as well as the global economy; and 

4 (5) in order to sustain the economy of the 

5 United States, Congress must fully support and en6 courage the growth of minority women-owned busi7 nesses. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6510
DAVEY JAMES REEDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGEORGE ALLEN, Governor; VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY; RONALD ANGELONE, Director; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-96-226-AM) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Davey James Reedy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reedy v. Allen , No. CA-96-226-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-05252 Document #: 48 Filed: 07/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:841
(January 16, 1979)

#### American Bank & Trust Company, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver, Respondent, v Andre Hercz, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 22, 1977, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Fein, J., at Special Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Silverman and Evans, JJ.
2823.404-70 Affirmative procurement program for recycled materials. ( a ) *Recovered materials preference program.* Preference will be given to procuring and using products containing recovered materials rather than products made with virgin materials when adequate competition exists, and when price, performance, and availability are equal.
( b ) *Promotion program.* The Department of Justice Environmental Executive (DOJEE) has primary responsibility for actively promoting the acquisition of products containing recycled materials throughout DOJ. Technical and procurement personnel will cooperate with the DOJEE to actively promote DOJ's Affirmative Procurement Program.
( c ) *Procedures for vendor estimation, verification, and certification* — ( 1 ) *Estimation.* The contractor shall provide estimates of the total percentage(s) of recovered materials for Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated items used in products or services provided.
( 2 ) *Certification.* Contracting officers shall provide copies of all vendor and subcontractor certifications required by FAR 23.404 to the DOJEE.
( 3 ) *Verification.* The DOJEE is responsible for periodically reviewing vendor certification documents and waivers as part of the annual review and monitoring process to determine if DOJ is in compliance with EOs 13101 and 13693 and any subsequent amendments.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Charles W. Fischer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
         Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies
         with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  November 7, 2002


                                          /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Charles W. Fischer
                                          President, and Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 221 

Designating September 25, 2017, as ‘‘National Lobster Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2017 

Mr. KING (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. MURPHY, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. REED, and Mr. MARKEY) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

AUGUST 1, 2017 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 25, 2017, as ‘‘National Lobster 

Day’’. 

Whereas the American lobster is recognized around the world 

as a prized and flavorful culinary delicacy; 

Whereas lobster fishing has served as an economic engine and 

family tradition in the United States for centuries; 

Whereas thousands of families in the United States make 

their livelihoods from lobster fishing and processing; 

Whereas, with approximately 150,000,000 pounds of lobster 

landed each year in the United States, at an annual value 

of more than $500,000,000, lobster represents one of the 

most valuable catches in the United States; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 221 ATS 

Whereas foreign markets for lobster from the United States 

are booming, with export values having nearly tripled 

since 2005; 

Whereas historical lore notes that lobster likely joined turkey 

on the table at the very first Thanksgiving feast in 1621; 

Whereas responsible lobstering practices beginning in the 

1600s have created one of the most sustainable fisheries 

in the world; 

Whereas 2017 marks the 145th anniversary of lobster conservation efforts in the United States, starting with a 

Maine law banning the harvest of egg-bearing females; 

Whereas, throughout history, United States Presidents have 

served lobster at their inaugural celebrations and state 

dinners with international leaders; 

Whereas lobster is an excellent, versatile source of lean protein that is low in saturated fat and high in vitamin B12; 

Whereas the peak of the lobstering season in the United 

States occurs in the late summer; 

Whereas the preservation and long distance transportation of 

lobster meat was first achieved 175 years ago with the 

advent of a canning process; 

Whereas lobster has become a culinary icon, with the lobster 

roll featured at the 2015 World Food Expo in Milan, 

Italy; and 

Whereas lobster is enjoyed at casual beach-side lobster boils 

and also revered as a delicacy at fine dining restaurants: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 221 ATS 

1 (1) designates September 25, 2017, as ‘‘Na2 tional Lobster Day’’; and 

3 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

4 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

5 activities. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 12
  INTERNATIONAL
    LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
  COMPUTATION
    OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
 (Unaudited)
  Years Ended December 31,2009


2008


2007


2006


2005(Dollars in thousands)EarningsNet income

$
895,629


$
703,125


$
604,366


$
499,267


$
438,349Add:Provision for income taxes


500,538



391,596



310,519



216,840



235,834Fixed charges


1,379,141



1,606,610



1,653,288



1,520,777



1,221,671Less:Capitalized interest


(10,360
)


(26,597
)


(37,192
)


(48,038
)


(54,097
)Earnings as adjusted (A)

$
2,764,948


$
2,674,734


$
2,530,981


$
2,188,846


$
1,841,757Preferred dividend requirements

$
3,830


$
5,227


$
5,346


$
5,421


$
4,650Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income


156
%


156
%


151
%


143
%


154
%Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis


5,975



8,154



8,072



7,752



7,161Fixed chargesInterest expense


1,365,490



1,576,664



1,612,886



1,469,650



1,164,432Capitalized interest


10,360



26,597



37,192



48,038



54,097Interest factor of rents


3,291



3,349



3,210



3,089



3,142Fixed charges as adjusted (B)


1,379,141



1,606,610



1,653,288



1,520,777



1,221,671Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)


1,385,116



1,614,764



1,661,360



1,528,529



1,228,832Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ((A) divided by (B))


2.00x



1.66x



1.53x



1.44x



1.51xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    ((A) divided by (C))


2.00x



1.66x



1.52x



1.43x



1.50x  90
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

t0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148535

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148535

COA: 318443

Wayne CC: 13

- 003436

- FC

CLIFFORD RASHAWN JOHNSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to correct

th e Presentence Investigation Report by replacing the words “crack cocaine” with

“marijuana” in the Evaluation and Plan. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED,

because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed

by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
#### 2419.808 Contract negotiation.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Anthony C. Weagley, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Corporation as of the dates
presented and the consolidated results of operations of the Corporation for the periods presented.



|April 14, 2014 | /s/ Anthony C. Weagley                | 
|-------------- | ------------------------------------- | 
|               | Anthony C. Weagley                    | 
|               | President and Chief Executive Officer | 

-13-
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Tracy A. Kern, as Chief Financial Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that:(6) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.; (7) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (8) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (9) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e)and 15(d)-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and(10) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: June 29, 2006 /s/ Tracy A. Kern   Tracy A. Kern   Chief Financial Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
#### 1352.270-70 Period of performance.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1370.101, insert the following clause:

# Period of Performance (APR 2010)

(a) The base period of performance of this contract is from ________ through ________. If an option is exercised, the period of performance shall be extended through the end of that option period.

(b) The option periods that may be exercised are as follows:

| Period | Start date | End date |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Option I | | |
| Option II | | |
| Option III | | |
| Option IV | | |

(c) The notice requirements for unilateral exercise of option periods are set out in FAR 52.217-9.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
#### 227.7107-3 Approval of restricted designs.

The clause at 252.227-7024, Notice and Approval of Restricted Designs, may be included in architect-engineer contracts to permit the Government to make informed decisions concerning noncompetitive aspects of the design.
#### The People, ex rel. Isaac Evans, Appellant, v. The Board of Commissioners of the Department of Public Parks of the City of New York, Respondent. The People, ex rel. Joseph F. Belton, Appellant, v. Same, Respondent.

(Argued June 4, 1883;

decided June 12, 1883.)

*Nelson J. Waterbury*for appellant.

*D. J. Dean*for respondent.

*630Agree to affirm on authority of *Phillips*v. *Mayor, etc.*(88 N. Y. 245), and *Langdon*v. *Mayor, etc.*(93 id. 129); no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 251

Amending rule XXXI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, to provide for 

timely consideration of nominations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2017

Mr. GARDNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION

Amending rule XXXI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, 

to provide for timely consideration of nominations.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. TIMELY CONSIDERATION OF NOMINATIONS. 

3 Rule XXXI of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 

4 amended—

5 (1) by redesignating paragraphs 3 through 7 as 

6 paragraphs 4 through 8, respectively; and 

7 (2) by inserting after paragraph 2 the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘3.(a) In this paragraph, the term ‘basic require10 ments’ means—

2 

•SRES 251 IS 

1 ‘‘(1) an agreement with the Office of Govern2 ment Ethics; 

3 ‘‘(2) a financial disclosure form; 

4 ‘‘(3) a background check conducted by the Fed5 eral Bureau of Investigation; 

6 ‘‘(4) a questionnaire of each relevant com7 mittee; 

8 ‘‘(5) tax forms, if required by a relevant com9 mittee; and 

10 ‘‘(6) any other requirements of a relevant com11 mittee. 

12 ‘‘(b) If a nomination has not been confirmed or re13 jected not later than 180 days after the day on which the 

14 nominee completes the basic requirements, the appropriate 

15 committees shall be automatically discharged and the 

16 nomination shall be eligible for expedited consideration in 

17 accordance with subparagraph (c). 

18 ‘‘(c)(1) The majority leader may provide notice that 

19 a nomination that is eligible for expedited consideration 

20 in accordance with this subparagraph shall be considered 

21 on an expedited basis. 

22 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding rule XXII, expedited consider23 ation of a covered nomination under this subparagraph, 

24 including consideration of any debatable motion or appeal 

3 

•SRES 251 IS 

1 in connection therewith shall be limited to 2 hours, evenly 

2 divided in the usual form.’’. 

Æ
The FOIA authorizes agencies to recover from requesters  certain costs associated with processing requests made under the Act. 5 U.S.C.  § 552 (a)(4)(A)(i) and (ii). The statute further provides for such fees to be  waived in whole or in part where “disclosure of the information [requested] is  in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to  public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is  not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.” 
  5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(iii)(2000); 34 C.F.R. § 5.64.

To qualify for a fee waiver, requesters must meet two  statutory requirements. First, the requester must support the request with  evidence that establishes that disclosure of the information sought is in the  public interest. In order to determine this, the Department must consider the  following four factors in order:

1. The  subject matter of the requested records themselves must specifically concern  identifiable “operations or activities of the government”;
2. In  order for the disclosure to “likely contribute” to an understanding of specific  government operations or activities, the disclosable portions of the requested  information must be meaningfully informative in relation to the subject matter  of the request;
3. The  disclosure must contribute to the “understanding of the public at large,” as  opposed to that of the individual requester or a narrow segment of interested  persons. With regard to this element, requesters should address with  particularity and in detail the requester’s subject matter expertise and  intentions, ability, and methods of disseminating information to the public;  and
4. The disclosure must “contribute  significantly” to public understanding of government operations or activities.

Requesters must meet all four elements of the public interest  test outlined above to satisfy this first statutory requirement for a fee  waiver. See Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of Justice, No. 03-5093, 2004 WL  980826 (D.C. Cir. May 7, 2004).

If the first statutory requirement is met, the Department will  then also determine whether the “disclosure of the information...is not primarily  in the commercial interest of the requester.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(iii). To  determine whether this second requirement has been satisfied, the Department  must consider the following two factors in order:

1. Does  the request involve any “commercial interest of the requester” (if not, the  requester satisfies the second prong of the statutory fee waiver test); and
2. If so, the agency must balance the  requester’s commercial interest against the identified public interest in  disclosure for the purpose of ascertaining which is the “primary interest;” a  fee waiver or reduction may granted only where the public interest in  disclosure is greater in magnitude than the requester’s commercial interest.

|Last Modified: 02/18/2015
|-------------------------