alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBITS 10(y)

                      SEALRIGHT CO., INC.
                      9201 Packaging Drive
                      DeSoto, Kansas 66018
                                
                                
                                
Pat Muldoon

Dear Pat:

          The Board of Directors of Sealright has approved
supplementary benefits for key executives.  The Benefits include
a Retention Payment and Severance Enhancements, but do not
otherwise modify your existing agreements or benefits.

Retention Payment

          If you remain in the continuous employment of Sealright
and perform your present duties through May 29, 1998, you will
receive a one time payment of $60,000.  However, if you are asked
to leave before this date without cause, you will receive this
payment.

Severance Enhancements

          If your employment with Sealright or its successor is
terminated without cause you will receive the benefits under the
Severance Pay Plan or your individual agreement plus the
following:

          1.   Payment of COBRA costs for as long as you desire
               such insurance coverage up to 12 months.
          2.   Payment for outplacement services for as long as 
               the services are needed up to 12 months.
          3.   Payment of your base salary for 12 months
               following the effective date of the termination in
               place of your existing arrangement.

In the event no transaction involving Sealright has been
consummated by December 31, 1998, the Board will review the
Severance Enhancements as well as all other benefits in the
normal course.

          If you have any questions about the foregoing, please
contact Carl Walker or me.


                                   Sincerely,


                                   /s/ Charles F. Marcy
#### 2904.703 Policy.
#### 28.304 Risk-pooling arrangements.

Agencies may establish risk-pooling arrangements. These arrangements are designed to use the services of the insurance industry for safety engineering and the handling of claims at minimum cost to the Government. The agency responsible shall appoint a single manager or point of contact for each arrangement.
## ADVANCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (ANOPR)

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD):

Energy Conservation Standards for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and

Incandescent Reflector Lamps

February 1 9, 2 008

U.S. Department of Energy

**Assistant Secretary** 

**Office of**  **Energy Efficiency**  **and Renewable**  **Energy**

**Building Technologies**  **Program**

**Appliances and**  **Commercial Equipment**  **Standards**

**Washington, DC**  **20585 This**  **Document was**  **prepared for**  **the Department**  **of Energy** 

**by staff**  **members of** 

**Navigant Consulting,**  **Inc., and**  **Lighting Research**  **Center**
#### The People of the State of New York v. Noel Barbosa.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur-—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
#### 28.312 Contract clause for insurance of leased motor vehicles.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.228-8, Liability and Insurance—Leased Motor Vehicles, in solicitations and contracts for the leasing of motor vehicles (see subpart 8.11).
22.103-1 Definition. *Normal workweek,* as used in this subpart, means, generally, a workweek of 40 hours. Outside the United States and its outlying areas, a workweek longer than 40 hours is considered normal if— ( 1 ) The workweek does not exceed the norm for the area, as determined by local custom, tradition, or law; and
( 2 ) The hours worked in excess of 40 in the workweek are not compensated at a premium rate of pay.
[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 12293, Apr. 9, 1986; 66 FR 2130, Jan. 10, 2001; 68 FR 28082, May 22, 2003]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23642-23643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10208]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7402]

The ``100,000 Strong'' Initiative Federal Advisory Committee: 
Notice of the Inaugural Meeting of the Committee

    The Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs of the Department of 
State hereby gives notice of a public meeting of the ``100,000 Strong'' 
Initiative Federal Advisory Committee. This is the inaugural meeting of 
the Advisory Committee. The ``100,000 Strong''

[[Page 23643]]

Federal Advisory Committee, composed of prominent China experts and 
leaders in business, academic and non-profit organizations, will serve 
a critical advisory role in achieving the Administration's goal, 
announced in May 2010, of seeing 100,000 Americans study in China by 
2014.
    Time and Place: The meeting will take place on May 10, 2011, from 
10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. EDT at the Department of State, Washington, 
DC. Participants should arrive by 10 a.m. at 2201 C Street NW., C 
Street Lobby, and will be directed to the meeting room.
    Public Participation: This Advisory Committee meeting is open to 
the public, subject to the capacity of the meeting room. Access to the 
building is controlled; persons wishing to attend should contact Lee 
Anne Shaffer of the Department of State's Bureau of East Asian and 
Pacific Affairs at ShafferL@state.gov and provide their name, 
affiliation, date of birth, country of citizenship, government 
identification type and number, e-mail address, and mailing address no 
later than May 5, 2011. Data from the public is requested pursuant to 
Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus Act of 1986) as amended; Public Law 107-56 
(USA PATRIOT ACT): and Executive Order 13356. The primary purpose for 
collecting this information is to validate the identity of individuals 
who enter Department facilities. Please see the Privacy Impact 
Assessment for VACS-D at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/100305.pdf for additional information. Persons who cannot participate 
in the meeting but who wish to comment are welcome to do so by e-mail 
to Lee Anne Shaffer at ShafferL@state.gov. A member of the public 
needing reasonable accommodation should advise the contact person 
identified above not later than May 3, 2011. Requests made after that 
date will be considered, but might not be able to be fulfilled. Members 
of the public who are unable to attend the Advisory Committee meeting 
in person but would like to participate by teleconferencing can contact 
Lee Anne Shaffer at 202-647-7059 to receive the conference call-in 
number and the relevant information.

    Dated: April 21, 2011.
Lee Anne Shaffer,
Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-10208 Filed 4-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
SCPW-22-0000320

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STEFANIE B. HILDRETH, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE MICHELLE L. DREWYER, Judge of the Family Court of the Second Circuit,

State of Hawai # i, Respondent Judge.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (FC-M NO. 22-1-0058)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRITS OF PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Stefanie B. Hildreth’s petition for writs of prohibition and mandamus, filed on May 4, 2022, the documents attached and submitted in support, and the record, petitioner fails to demonstrate she has a clear and indisputable right to relief or that she lacks alternative means to seek relief. It also cannot be said that the respondent judge exceeded her jurisdiction, committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or refused to act on a matter properly before the court under circumstances in which the judge has a Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-22-0000320 25-MAY-2022 10:19 AM Dkt. 17 ODDPlegal duty to act. Petitioner is thus not entitled to the

requested extraordinary writs. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (explaining that a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; such a writ is meant to restrain a judge who has exceeded the judge’s jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in which the judge has a legal duty to act); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of prohibition “is an extraordinary remedy . . . to restrain a judge of an inferior court from acting beyond or in excess of his [or her] jurisdiction”). Accordingly,

It is ordered that the petition for writs of prohibition and mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 25, 2022. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
#### 2406.501 Requirement.

The Senior Procurement Executive is the head of the agency for the purposes of FAR 6.501 and designates the Departmental competition advocate.

[77 FR 73526, Dec. 10, 2012]
Consumer Product Safety Alert

FROM THE U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20207

Stair Steps and Baby Wa l k e rs Don’t Mix

009611

Always watch a child in a

baby walker to prevent the

child from tipping over or

falling down stairs.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

(CPSC) warns parents that baby walkers are not

“baby sitters.” Always take precautions and watch a

child in a baby walker to prevent the child from tipping over or falling down stairs and being injured

or killed.

CPSC estimates that each year there are 21,300

hospital emergency room treated injuries associated with baby walkers for children under 15 months

of age. CPSC receives reports of an average one

to two deaths a year with baby walkers. Most of

the injuries were caused by falling down stairs.

Before putting a child in a baby walker, take several precautions. Check for hazardous areas where

the baby walker might go. Block off stairways and

exit doorways. Avoid areas where there are uneven

floors such as carpet edges or raised thresholds

that may cause the walker to tip-over. Clear away

objects on tables, countertops, or stove tops that a

child in a baby walker might be able to reach. To

avoid burn injuries, don’t let a child use a baby

walker near ranges, space heaters, or fireplaces.

After putting a child in a baby walker, watch the

child carefully because a child can move very fast

in a baby walker.

A voluntary standard for baby walkers requires that

walkers carry warning labels with many of these

messages on them. The standard also requires a

separate warning label – easily seen when the

consumer places a child in the walker – instructing

care givers to block stairs and steps securely

before using the walker.
You may search for current grantees under the Educational Technology, Media, and Materials for Individuals with Disabilities program by accessing the link below: 

**Discretionary Grants Database**
Disclaimer of Endorsement
2001.105 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0169.
( b ) The information collection requirements contained in this part appear in 2009.570-3, 2009.570-5, 2009.570-8, 2014.201-670, 2027.305-3, 2042.570-1, 2042.803, 2045.371, 2052.204-70, 2052.204-71, 2052.209-70, 2052.209-71, 2052.209-72, 2052.211-70, 2052.211-71, 2052.211-72, 2052.211-72 Alternate 1, 2052.214-71, 2052.214-72, 2052.214-74, 2052.215-70, 2052.215-71, 2052.215-74, 2052.215-75, 2052.215-75 Alternate 1, 2052.215-75 Alternate 2, 2052.215-78, 2052.216-72, 2052.227-70, 2052.235-70, 2052.235-71, 2052.242-70, and 2052.242-71.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. These information collection requirements and control numbers under which they are approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In 2052.215-77(a) and 2052.215-78(b), NRC Form 445 is approved under control number 3150-0193.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
28.103-2 Performance bonds. ( a ) Performance bonds may be required for contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold when necessary to protect the Government's interest. The following situations may warrant a performance bond: ( 1 ) Government property or funds are to be provided to the contractor for use in performing the contract or as partial compensation (as in retention of salvaged material).
( 2 ) A contractor sells assets to or merges with another concern, and the Government, after recognizing the latter concern as the successor in interest, desires assurance that it is financially capable.
( 3 ) Substantial progress payments are made before delivery of end items starts.
( 4 ) Contracts are for dismantling, demolition, or removal of improvements.
( b ) The Government may require additional performance bond protection when a contract price is increased.
( c ) The contracting officer must determine the contractor's responsibility (see subpart 9.1) even though a bond has been or can be obtained.
[48 FR 42286, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34759, July 3, 1995; 61 FR 39213, July 26, 1996]
# Euroopa Liidu C 394A/27.

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 394A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 58. köide27. november 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 394A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

58. köide27. november 2015

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Eurojust |
| 2015/C 394A/01 | Teade Eurojusti haldusdirektori vaba ametikoha kohta (palgaaste AD 14) — Haag (Madalmaad) — 15/EJ/04 | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Eurojust

2015/C 394A/01

Teade Eurojusti haldusdirektori vaba ametikoha kohta (palgaaste AD 14) — Haag (Madalmaad) — 15/EJ/04

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Eurojust

| 27.11.2015 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2015

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 394/1

---

TEADE EUROJUSTI HALDUSDIREKTORI VABA AMETIKOHA KOHTA (PALGAASTE AD 14)

Haag (Madalmaad) — 15/EJ/04

(2015/C 394 A/01)

Eurojust kutsub soovijaid kandideerima Eurojusti haldusdirektori ametikohale. Eurojust loodi 2002. aastal tõhustamaks Euroopa Liidu liikmesriikide pädevate asutuste tööd võitluses raskete piiriüleste kuritegude ja organiseeritud kuritegevusega. Eurojusti tegevust juhib kolleegium, mis koosneb prokuröridest, kohtunikest või politseiametnikest. Haldusdirektor, tegutsedes Eurojusti kolleegiumi presidendi järelevalve all, vastutab Eurojusti igapäevase haldamise ja personalijuhtimise eest. Lisateavet ametikoha ja kandideerimise kohta leiate meie veebilehelt

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

Avalduste esitamise tähtaeg on 31. jaanuari 2016 kesköö Kesk-Euroopa aja järgi.

---
#### 2452.209-70 Potential organizational conflicts of interest.

As prescribed in 2409.507-1, the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially the same as follows in solicitations:

# Potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest (FEB 2000)

(a) The Contracting Officer has determined that the proposed contract contains a potential organizational conflict of interest. Offerors are directed to FAR subpart 9.5 for detailed information concerning organizational conflicts of interest.

(b) The nature of the potential conflict of interest is [*Contracting Officer insert description*]:

(c) Offerors shall provide a statement which describes concisely all relevant facts concerning any past, present or planned interest (financial, contractual, organizational, or otherwise) relating to the work to be performed under the proposed contract and bearing on whether the offeror has a possible organizational conflict of interest with respect to:

(1) Being able to render impartial, technically sound, and objective assistance or advice, or

(2) Being given an unfair competitive advantage. The offeror may also provide relevant facts that show how its organizational structure and/or management systems limit its knowledge of possible organizational conflicts of interest relating to other divisions or sections of the organization and how that structure or system would avoid or mitigate such organizational conflict.

(d) No award shall be made until any potential conflict of interest has been neutralized or mitigated to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer.

(e) Refusal to provide the requested information or the willful misrepresentation of any relevant information by an offeror shall disqualify the offeror from further consideration for award of a contract under this solicitation.

(f) If the Contracting Officer determines that a potential conflict can be avoided, effectively mitigated, or otherwise resolved through the inclusion of a special contract clause, the terms of the clause will be subject to negotiation.

(End of provision)

[65 FR 3577, Jan. 21, 2000]
#### 252.232-7018 Progress Payments—Multiple Lots.

As prescribed in 232.502-4-70(c), use the following clause:

# Progress Payments—Multiple Lots (MAY 2023)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Lot* means one or more fixed-price deliverable line items or deliverable subline items representing a single, severable group where the sum of the costs for each group is segregated and a single progress payment rate is used.

*Multiple lots* means more than one lot on a single contract where progress payment proration is performed on a lot-wide, versus contract-wide, basis.

(b) When submitting progress payment requests under the billing instructions in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.232-16, Progress Payments, or Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) clause 252.232-7002, Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions, of this contract, the Contractor shall—

(1) Submit separate progress payment requests for each lot identified in the contract;

(2) Identify the contract price for the lot as the sum of all fixed-priced line items identified to the lot, in accordance with FAR 32.501-3;

(3) Identify the lot on each progress payment request to which the request applies;

(4) Calculate each request on the basis of the price, costs (including the cost to complete), subcontractor financing, and progress payment liquidations of the lot to which it applies; and

(5) Distribute costs among lots in a manner acceptable to the Administrative Contracting Officer.

(c) Submit a separate progress payment request for U.S. and FMS requirements in accordance with the DFARS clause 252.232-7002, Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions, of this contract.

(End of clause)

[88 FR 33833, May 25, 2023]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00228

- CR

ANGEL GABRIEL GRIMALDO

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Calhoun County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- CR

- 8511

- DC

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having cons idered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 4, 2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN B. TURNER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

DUSTIN TIERNEY, in his Individual Capacity as Correctional Officer of the California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 15

- 15390

D.C. No. 3:12

- cv

- 06231

- MMC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017 **

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Stephen B. Turner appeals pro se from the district court’ s order denying his

motion to modify a settlement agreement and request to vacate the order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 27 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 15390

dismissing his underlying 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in light of that settlement

agreement . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

of discretion a denial of motion for relief from a final judgment or order

. Casey v.

Albertson’s Inc. , 362 F.3d 1254, 125 7 (9th Cir. 2004)

. We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Turner’s motion to

modify the settlement agreement and vacate the order of dismissal because Turner

failed to file these motion within 180 days, as required by the or der of dismissal.

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c) (1) (motions to vacate an order under Rule 60(b) must be

brought “within a reasonable time”); s ee also Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc.

,

624 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 2010) ( describing d istrict court ’ s wide discretion in

case management and obligation “ to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive

determination of every action” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted));

Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc. , 452 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir. 2006)

(attorney mistakes are more appropriately address ed through malpractice claims

,

not Rule 60(b)(1) motions ).

We do not consider allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See

Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFI RMED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sufism in northern Nigeria:force for counter-radicalization?**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146:SU 2
Item Number:0307-A-31 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000689635
 
January 10, 2020
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
TRUSTEES OF THE PENSION, WELFARE
AND VACATION FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS
OF IBEW LOCAL 701,
Plaintiffs,

AMERICAN SIGN & LIGHTING CO., JUDGE: Gottschall

an Illinois corporation, and

JORDAN UDITSKY, Individually, Magistrate Judge: Valdez

)
)
)
)
)
)
vs. ) No.: 12 CV 04330
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OF JUDGMENT

On September 19, 2012, Judgment was entered in favor of the Plaintiffs, TRUSTEES OF
THE PENSION, WELFARE AND VACATION FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS OF IBEW LOCAL
701and against Defendant, AMERICAN SIGN & LIGHTING CO., an Illinois corporation, in the

total amount of $45,495.68

DATED:

fie § op Dh oe
Bie Py fp
ENTERY (thei LE
~ Honorable Judge Joan B. Gottschall

“

John F. Etzkorn

ARNOLD AND KADJAN

203 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1650
Chicago, IL 60601

Tel: (312) 236-0415
#### Baivard Realty Corp. et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. State of New York, Respondent-Appellant.

Motion to require claimants to accept service of notice of cross appeal, which had been refused on the ground that the State by serving a certificate of no appeal had waived its right of cross appeal, granted, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.