alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ashley Builders Corp., Appellant, v Town of Brookhaven, Respondent.

[833 NYS2d 230]

*443In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant effected an unconstitutional taking by imposing certain conditions on the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Loughlin, J.), dated February 2, 2006, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“A justiciable controversy must involve a present, rather than hypothetical, contingent or remote, prejudice to the plaintiff’ *(Waterways Dev. Corp. v Lavalle,*28 AD3d 539, 540 [2006], citing *American Ins. Assn. v Chu,*64 NY2d 379, 383 [1985], *cert denied*474 US 803 [1985]). “The dispute must be real, definite, substantial, and sufficiently matured so as to be ripe for judicial determination” *(Waterways Dev. Corp. v Lavalle, supra*at 540).

Here, the record shows that the plaintiff did not apply for a certificate of occupancy for the single-family dwelling that it intends to build on the subject property, and that the defendant has not made a final determination denying the plaintiff a certificate of occupancy. Thus, this dispute is not ripe for judicial review, and there is no justiciable controversy upon which the court may properly render a declaratory judgment. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; *Weingarten v Town of Lewisboro,*77 NY2d 926 [1991]; *Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v Barwick,*67 NY2d 510 [1986], *cert denied*479 US 985 [1986]; *Waterways Dev. Corp. v Lavalle, supra*at 540). Schmidt, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.
## Workbook Contents

**United States Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)**

Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data **Worksheet Name Description**  **Data 1** United States Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)

Release Date: 12/29/2011 Next Release Date: 1/30/2012 Excel File Name: n3035us3m.xls Available from Web Page: http://tonto.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n3035us3m.htm Source: Energy Information Administration For Help, Contact: infoctr@eia.doe.gov (202) 586-8800**# Of Series Frequency** **Latest Data for**

1 Monthly 10/2011

9/27/2012 8:05:22 PMBack to Contents

### Data 1: United States Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)

**Sourcekey N3035US3** 

**Date United States Natural** 

**Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per**  **Thousand Cubic Feet)**  Jan-2001 8.84 Feb-2001 7.21 Mar-2001 6.3 Apr-2001 6.08 May-2001 5.46 Jun-2001 4.75 Jul-2001 4.1 Aug-2001 3.99 Sep-2001 3.5 Oct-2001 3.18 Nov-2001 3.88 Dec-2001 3.69 Jan-2002 4.05 Feb-2002 3.7 Mar-2002 3.78 Apr-2002 3.64 May-2002 4.07 Jun-2002 3.86 Jul-2002 3.8 Aug-2002 3.62 Sep-2002 3.89 Oct-2002 4.18 Nov-2002 4.72 Dec-2002 4.92 Jan-2003 5.65 Feb-2003 6.4 Mar-2003 8.27 Apr-2003 5.96 May-2003 5.78 Jun-2003 6.59 Jul-2003 5.69 Aug-2003 5.28 Sep-2003 5.32 Oct-2003 4.93 Nov-2003 5.19 Dec-2003 5.9 Jan-2004 6.72 Feb-2004 6.52 Mar-2004 5.97 Apr-2004 6.06 May-2004 6.34 Jun-2004 6.82 Jul-2004 6.41 Aug-2004 6.36Sep-2004 5.68

Oct-2004 6.03 Nov-2004 7.64 Dec-2004 7.54 Jan-2005 7.06 Feb-2005 7.15 Mar-2005 7.12 Apr-2005 7.71 May-2005 7.19 Jun-2005 6.91 Jul-2005 7.4 Aug-2005 7.98 Sep-2005 10.18 Oct-2005 12.06 Nov-2005 12.11 Dec-2005 11.17 Jan-2006 10.85 Feb-2006 9.38 Mar-2006 8.24 Apr-2006 7.93 May-2006 7.63 Jun-2006 6.92 Jul-2006 6.78 Aug-2006 7.36 Sep-2006 7.21 Oct-2006 5.62 Nov-2006 7.74 Dec-2006 8.23 Jan-2007 7.36 Feb-2007 8.25 Mar-2007 8.42 Apr-2007 8.14 May-2007 8.11 Jun-2007 7.92 Jul-2007 7.51 Aug-2007 6.72 Sep-2007 6.28 Oct-2007 7.06 Nov-2007 7.87 Dec-2007 8.18 Jan-2008 8.29 Feb-2008 8.96 Mar-2008 9.61 Apr-2008 10.03 May-2008 11.35 Jun-2008 12.11 Jul-2008 13.06 Aug-2008 10.1 Sep-2008 9.13 Oct-2008 8.1 Nov-2008 7.34 Dec-2008 7.86Jan-2009 7.5

Feb-2009 6.43 Mar-2009 5.69 Apr-2009 5.05 May-2009 4.4 Jun-2009 4.56 Jul-2009 4.68 Aug-2009 4.38 Sep-2009 3.89 Oct-2009 4.82 Nov-2009 5.44 Dec-2009 5.97 Jan-2010 6.93 Feb-2010 6.76 Mar-2010 6.01 Apr-2010 5.12 May-2010 5.07 Jun-2010 5.03 Jul-2010 5.49 Aug-2010 5.37 Sep-2010 4.61 Oct-2010 4.74 Nov-2010 4.6 Dec-2010 5.42 Jan-2011 5.63 Feb-2011 5.75 Mar-2011 5.19 Apr-2011 5.33 May-2011 5.2 Jun-2011 5.19 Jul-2011 5.05 Aug-2011 5.22 Sep-2011 4.81 Oct-2011 4.68

### Data 1: United States Natural Gas Industrial Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
217.103 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Advance procurement* means an exception to the full funding policy that allows acquisition of long lead time items (advance long lead acquisition) or economic order quantities (EOQ) of items (advance EOQ acquisition) in a fiscal year in advance of that in which the related end item is to be acquired. Advance procurements may include materials, parts, components, and effort that must be funded in advance to maintain a planned production schedule.
*Congressional defense committees* means— ( 1 ) The Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
( 2 ) The Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
( 3 ) The Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
( 4 ) The Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives;
( 5 ) The Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and
( 6 ) The Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
*Military installation* means a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, or other activity under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of a military department or, in the case of an activity in a foreign country, under the operational control of the Secretary of a military department or the Secretary of Defense (10 U.S.C. 2801(c)(4)).
[68 FR 43332, July 22, 2003, as amended at 79 FR 35700, June 24, 2014; 80 FR 29982, May 26, 2015]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-645

_____________________________

ISAAC BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

September 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
(110 App. Div. 732.)

#### WIEDYNSKA v. PULASKI POLISH BENEV. SOC.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 26, 1906.)

, Insurance—Mutual Benefit Insurance—Amendment of Contract—Validity.

It is not within the power of a benevolent association to so amend its constitution and by-laws, without the consent of or notice to a member, as to reduce the sick benefits payable to the member under his contract with the association.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 28, Cent. Dig. Insurance, § 1855.]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Brooklyn, First District.

Action by Magdalena Wiedynska, as administratrix of Frank Bosikowski, against the Pulaski Polish Benevolent Society. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before JENKS, HOOKER, RICH, and MILLER, JJ.

Thomas Kelby, for appellant.

Henry J. Davenport, for respondent..

JENKS, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate was a member of a benevolent society. The constitution and by-laws are in the Polish. language. No *414translation thereof is in the record, but parts thereof were interpreted and read’in "evidence. It seems that the object of the society-is “to pay sick arid death benefits.” When the intestate fell ill he was entitled, under the constitution and the by-laws, to receive during his illness certain weekly sums graded for six months, three riionths, and then $2 weekly during the’ period of illness. He fell ill on" May 3, 1898, and received sick benefits until March 10, 1902; but thereafter nothing. This action is to recover the sum of the $2 weekly payments for the period intervening March 10, 1902, and his death. The defendant showed that on March 10, 1902, the constitution (?) and'the by-laws were amended so as to prohibit the payment of more than $300 to any member for sick benefits, and proved that the sum theretofore paid to the intestate exceeded that amount.

It is not asserted that the intestate ever assented to this change, or that he ever had notice thereof. The appellant contends that such change was within the powers of the association, and cites two authorities, with stress upon Poultney v. Bachman, 131 Hun, 49. His contention is also sustained by the judgment in Pain v. Societé St. Jean Baptiste, 172 Mass. 319; 52 N. E. 502, 70 Am. St. Rep. 287, wherein Poultney’s Case, supra, is cited. But in Parish v. New York Produce Exchange, 169 N. Y. 34, 36, 61 N. E. 977, 56 L. R. A. 149, the court, after mention of the holding in Pain’s Case, supra, on the precise point now up, says that “the trend of authority in this state is, however, in the other direction.” That is, that such an association cannot under power of amendment divest rights which have vested. Moreover, I think that we are committed to this view by our judgment in Bottjer v. Supreme Council, 178 App. Div. 546, 75 N. Y. Supp. 805, 79 N. Y. Supp. 684.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs, All concur.
#### 225.771-5 Solicitation provision.

Use the provision at 252.225-7050, Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services (other than commercial satellite services), that are expected to result in contracts of $150,000 or more. If the solicitation includes the provision at FAR 52.204-7, do not separately list the provision 252.225-7050 in the solicitation.

[79 FR 73489, Dec. 11, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 6584, Jan. 31, 2023]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Nos. 33-31298, 33-85020, 333-39499 and 333-80079 of Silicon Valley Group, Inc.
on Forms S-8 of our report dated October 30, 2000 (November 15, 2000 as to the
first sentence of Note 7) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Silicon Valley Group, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2000.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------------

San Jose, California
December 28, 2000
```

[111th Congress Public Law 169]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 1192]]

Public Law 111-169
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Adams 
Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work in honor of former 
President John Adams and his legacy, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: May 
                       24, 2010 -  [H.R. 2802]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 40 USC 8903 note.>> EXTENSION OF LEGISLATIVE 
                              AUTHORITY FOR MEMORIAL 
                              ESTABLISHMENT.

    (a) Legislative Authority.--Section 1(c) of Public Law 107-62 is 
amended by <<NOTE: 40 USC 1003 note.>> striking ``accordance with'' and 
all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the 
following: ``accordance with chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, 
except that any reference in section 8903(e) of that chapter to the 
expiration at the end of or extension beyond a seven-year period shall 
be considered to be a reference to an expiration on or extension beyond 
December 2, 2013.''.

    (b) Technical Amendments.--Public Law 107-62 is amended--
            (1) in section 1(e), by striking ``(40 U.S.C. 1001, et 
        seq.)'' and inserting ``(40 U.S.C. 8901 et seq.)''; and
            (2) in section 2, <<NOTE: 40 USC 1003 note.>> by striking 
        ``(40 U.S.C. 1002)'' and inserting ``(40 U.S.C. 8902(a))''.

    Approved May 24, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2802:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111-261 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 111-155 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 155 (2009):
                                    Sept. 22, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 156 (2010):
                                    May 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITE HERE HEALTH, )

)

MATTHEW WALKER, as fiduciary of UNITE HERE )

HEALTH, ) CIVIL ACTION

)

Plaintiffs, ) NO. 12 C 5137

)

vs. ) JUDGE ROBERT W. GETTLEMAN

)

RICHARD SIMON, d/b/a United Maintenance Service )

at Hyatt Regency O’Hare, )

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT

NOWCOME Plaintiffs, bytheir attorneys, and move for entryofjudgment bydefault against

Defendant, RICHARD SIMON, d/b/a United Maintenance Service at Hyatt Regency O’Hare, in the

total amount of $295,914.70, plus Plaintiffs’ court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount

of $2,301.25. 

On June 28, 2012, the Summons and Complaint was served on the Defendant’s attorney (by

mailing copies ofsaid documents, along with the Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service

of a Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons) (a copy of the Summons and Waiver of Service

of Summons is attached hereto). Therefore, Defendant’s answer or motion under Rule 12 was due

by August 28, 2012. As Defendant has failed to timely answer the Complaint, Plaintiffs respectfully

request entry of default and judgment.

/s/ Laura M. Finnegan 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the

foregoing document (Motion) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further

certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following

non-CM/ECF participants on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 11th day of September 2012:

Mr. Richard Simon

1550 S. Indiana Avenue

Chicago, IL 60605

Mr. Tom H. Luetkemeyer

Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP

222 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60601-1081

/s/ Laura M. Finnegan 

Laura M. Finnegan

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6210637

Telephone: (312) 236-4316

Facsimile: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: lmfinnegan@baumsigman.com

I:\HEREW\United Maintenance\motion.lmf.df.wpd
**Reporting:**

- If you apply for a grant under this competition, you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition.  This does not apply if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
- At the end of your project period, you must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary.  If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118.  The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c).  For specific requirements on reporting, please go to the Grant Application and Other Forms page.

**Performance Measures:**

The Secretary has established the following Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) performance measures for the Center:

- The extent to which the project serves students with disabilities, families of students with disabilities, individualized education program teams and individualized plan for employment teams, including growth in numbers served over time and improved user satisfaction ratings with the services received;
- The extent to which the project provides information and technical assistance to faculty, staff and administrators of institutions of higher education aimed at improving accommodation, retention and completion rates of students with disabilities, including growth in the number of persons and institutions served over time and improved user satisfaction ratings with services received, baseline change over time in retention and completion rates of students with disabilities at the institutions served; and
- The extent and growth over time in utilization of the database of disability services information by institutions of higher education, including improved user satisfaction ratings of the accessibility and utility of the information provided.

These measures constitute the Department's indicators of success for this program.  Consequently, we advise an applicant for an award under this program to give careful consideration to the operationalization of the measures in conceptualizing the approach and evaluation for its proposed project.

If funded, you will be required to collect and report data in your project’s annual performance report (34 CFR 75.590).

For more information about performance requirements for this program, contact the ED program office.

 Top

Institutional Services
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 53201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21548]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $21 million 
guarantee to support the $19 million export of a wire rod mill to the 
Czech Republic. The U.S. export will replace an existing facility and 
enable the Czech company to expand its production of wire rod by 
approximately 50,000 metric tons annually during the 8.5-year repayment 
term of the obligation. Available information indicates that the 
additional wire rod production will be sold domestically in the Czech 
Republic and Slovakia, Germany, and Italy.
    Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction by email 
to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 
947, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this notice 
appears in the Federal Register.

Kathryn Hoff-Patrinos,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-21548 Filed 8-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Classic Air Aviation, llC 

4805 E Falcon Drive, Mesa AZ 85215 

Tel: (602) 574-5376 

Email: kacie @classica iraviation .com 

To: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Sent via U.S. Certified Mail, 

Return Receipt Requested 

August 7, 2015 

RE: FAA Case N. 201SWP910053 Classic Air Aviation, LLC 

Your Honor, 

........ 

;::::::> 

._,., 

>-

c:: 

C) 

w 

"'0 

\':Y. 

w 

a-

~ 

U> 

oo 

...,,., 

-,"'0 

-:-1 

oo 

rrt-, 

$.-1 '::::0 ::I:;:> 

m:z 

:l>"(J) 

:::0"'0 

Q

%~ ' 

(J)> ...... 

0 

% 

Please accept this letter as our response from Classic Air Aviation, LLC to the Complaint letter dated July 

7, 2015 and received from Michael Urbano on July 29, 2015. This letters serves as our notice to deny all 

allegations as we have not retained proper counsel. 

Thank you in advance for your attention in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me with any 

questions at 602-574-5376. 

Kacie M. Busch 

Operations Manager, Respondent
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER IN ACCORDANCE WITH 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  In connection with the Annual Report of Wound Management Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott A. Haire, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 April 13, 2010
 /S/    Scott A. Haire
 Scott A. Haire,
 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
               UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cybrdi Inc. ("We") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xue Bu, the principal
financial officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of us

                                      /s/ Xue Bu
                                      ----------
                                      Name: Xue Bu, Principal Financial Officer
                                      Date: August 20, 2007
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                              CONSENT OF AUDITORS



<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports (1)
dated February 18, 2000 with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements
and schedules of PFL Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated January 28, 2000 with
respect to the subaccounts of PFL Life Variable Annuity Account C, which are
available for investment by contract owners of the Extra Variable Annuity,
included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement (Form
N-4 No. 333-83957) and related Prospectus of the Extra Variable Annuity.


                                                     /s/  Ernst & Young, LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 24, 2000
FILED

6/6/2012

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case: 1:12-cv-03947 Document #: 6 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:13
Case: 1:12-cv-03947 Document #: 6 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:14
Case: 1:12-cv-03947 Document #: 6 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:15
Case: 1:12-cv-03947 Document #: 6 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:16
Case: 1:12-cv-03947 Document #: 6 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:17
Case: 1:12-cv-03947 Document #: 6 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:18
Case: 1:12-cv-03947 Document #: 6 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:19