alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PEOPLE ex rel. CORSCADDEN v. HOWE, County Treasurer.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 17, 1903.)

1. Public Officers—Compensation.

A public officer who has acted and is acting under a salary prescribed by statute to which he is entitled, for services rendered, assuming that the right to remove him exists, is entitled to full pay until his removal.

Appeal from Special Term, Albany County.

Mandamus by the people, on the relation of John E. Corscadden, against John A. Howe, as county treasurer. From an order directing a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring defendant to pay relator his salary as superintendent of the Albany penitentiary, defendant appeals. Affirmed. See 82 N. Y. Supp. 347.

Argued before PARKER, P. J., and SMITH, CHASE, CHESTER, and HOUGHTON, JJ.

J. S. Frost (J. Newton Fiero, of counsel), for appellant.

Countryman & Du Bois, for respondent.

SMITH, J.

We see no ground for this appeal. The relator has acted and is acting as superintendent of the penitentiary under a salary prescribed by statute, to which he is clearly entitled. He has not been removed by the commission, and, if the right of the commission to remove him be assumed for the argument, until he is removed he is entitled to full for services rendered.

The order should therefore be affirmed, without costs. All concur.
EXHIBIT 32



          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), Dorrit J. Bern, Chairman of
the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer and Eric M. Specter, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Charming Shoppes, Inc. (the
"Company"), each certifies with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 30, 2005 (the "Report") that, to the best
of her/his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   September 6, 2005

                                           /S/ DORRIT J. BERN
                                           ------------------
                                           Dorrit J. Bern
                                           Chairman of the Board
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   September 6, 2005

                                           /S/ ERIC M. SPECTER
                                           -------------------
                                           Eric M. Specter
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Kevin WashingtonITW Government Affairs202.261.3550kwashington@itw.comMary DaneAgency Approval EngineerTraulsen – ITW Food Equipment Group800.825.8220 x6741mdane@traulsen.comJoe SandersPrincipal EngineerTraulsen – ITW Food Equipment Group817.625.9671 x6537jsanders@traulsen.comTraulsen Self-Contained Product Scope•Blast Chillers•Thawing Cabinets•Beverage Cooler•Milk Cooler•Wine Chillers•Deli Cabinets•Pastry Cabinets•Undercounter Refrigerators /Freezers•Reach-in Refrigerators / Freezers•Refrigerated Merchandisers•Refrigerated Drawers•Refrigerated Chef Bases•Prep Tables•Restaurants/chains•(~1 million nationwide)•Corporate Facilities•Correctional Facilities•Health Care•Casinos & Stadiums•Schools•Laboratories and Flower Shops•SupermarketsApproved substitutions and available technologies are inadequate(see Traulsencomments p.3)Traulsen Rule 20 Comments• Provide better definitions of product scope• Set GWP levels by applications and so thatmanufacturers can decide where and how todedicate redesign resources(see page3)• Effective date no earlier than 2020 for self-contained refrigeration using HFCs rated 2500GWP or higher(see page 10-12)• Effective date no earlier than 2023 for self-contained refrigeration foam rated 150 orhigher(see page 10-12)• Exempt for at least 5 years beyond theeffective date for CRE product categoriesrequiring more than 150 grams of refrigerantuntil nonflammable options are commerciallyavailable and technical feasibility can be established(see page 16)• Allow destination market-based product export requirements(see pages 9, 12)Rule 20 Product Implications• Design cycle for CRE• Compressor approvals• Product categories used by industry• New v. retrofit issue• Alternative substances• Refrigerant, foam quantity• Which products used in• Pros and cons of each• International issues• EU and Canada harmonization• Supermarket issues
#### 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment.

As prescribed in 243.205-71, use the following clause:

# Requests for Equitable Adjustment (DEC 2022)

(a) The amount of any request for equitable adjustment to contract terms shall accurately reflect the contract adjustment for which the Contractor believes the Government is liable. The request shall include only costs for performing the change, and shall not include any costs that already have been reimbursed or that have been separately claimed. All indirect costs included in the request shall be properly allocable to the change in accordance with applicable acquisition regulations.

(b) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3862(a), any request for equitable adjustment to contract terms that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold shall bear, at the time of submission, the following certificate executed by an individual authorized to certify the request on behalf of the Contractor:

I certify that the request is made in good faith, and that the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Official's Name)

(Title)

(c) The certification in paragraph (b) of this clause requires full disclosure of all relevant facts, including—

(1) Certified cost or pricing data if required in accordance with subsection 15.403-4 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); and

(2) Data other than certified cost or pricing data, in accordance with subsection 15.403-3 of the FAR, including actual cost data and data to support any estimated costs, even if certified cost or pricing data are not required.

(d) The certification requirement in paragraph (b) of this clause does not apply to—

(1) Requests for routine contract payments; for example, requests for payment for accepted supplies and services, routine vouchers under a cost-reimbursement type contract, or progress payment invoices; or

(2) Final adjustment under an incentive provision of the contract.

(End of clause)

[63 FR 11549, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 66 FR 49865, Oct. 1, 2001; 77 FR 76941, Dec. 31, 2012; 87 FR 76998, Dec. 16, 2022]
|
|
|
|

1. What is the purpose of the program?
2. What kinds of activities can be supported with grant funds?
3. How often are competitions generally held?
4. What is the duration of the average grant?
5. What is the average annual grant amount?
6. Is there a cost matching requirement?  If so, are in-kind contributions acceptable as part of the grantee’s match?
7. What are the reporting requirements for grantees?  What kind of records and data should be maintained or collected in order to complete required reports?

The purpose of the Training Program for Federal TRIO Programs (Training Program) is to provide Federal financial assistance to train the staff and leadership personnel employed in, or preparing for employment in, Federal TRIO Program projects.

- A Training Program project may include on-site training, online training, conferences, internships, seminars, workshops, and the publication of manuals designed to improve the operations of Federal TRIO Program projects.
- Each year, one or more Training Program projects must provide at least one training session on each requisite topic listed within a specific priority that is tailored to the needs of TRIO staff with less than two years of TRIO project experience.
- Each year, one or more Training Program projects must offer training covering the following topics:
- The legislative and regulatory requirements for operating projects funded under the Federal TRIO Programs.
- Assisting students to receive adequate student financial aid from programs authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act (HEA), as well as from other programs.
- The design and operation of model Federal TRIO Program projects.
- The use of appropriate educational technology in the operation of TRIO Program projects.
- Strategies for recruiting and serving hard-to-reach populations, including students who are limited English proficient, students from groups traditionally underrepresented in postsecondary education, students who are individuals with disabilities, students who are homeless children and youth, students who are foster care youth, or other disconnected students.

Competitions under the TRIO Training Program are held every two years.

All grantees receive two-year grants.

The average annual grant award is $348,250.

There is no cost matching requirement for the TRIO Training Program.

Grantees are required to submit annual performance reports during the two-year funding cycle using the Department's e-Reports function.  This online system collects narratives and data about funded projects to enable program specialists to determine whether a grantee is making substantial progress toward meeting approved project objectives.  In addition, grantees are required to submit a first-year interim performance report.



TRIO Home

|Last Modified: 08/18/2011
|-------------------------
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 08, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 08, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0121. ANA HENAO v. MIGUEL HENAO.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

19A05655
2409.405 Effect of listing. ( 3 ) The Senior Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee under FAR 9.405(d)(3).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 345 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 345

      Designating August 3, 2018, as ``National Ernie Pyle Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 30, 2017

   Mr. Young (for himself and Mr. Donnelly) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           December 20, 2017

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Designating August 3, 2018, as ``National Ernie Pyle Day''.

Whereas Ernest ``Ernie'' Pyle was born on August 3, 1900, in Dana, Indiana;
Whereas Pyle studied journalism at Indiana University Bloomington before 
        becoming a reporter for The Daily Herald in La Porte, Indiana;
Whereas Pyle eventually became a roving correspondent for Scripps-Howard 
        newspapers, writing a column carried in approximately 200 newspapers;
Whereas Pyle served as a war correspondent in Britain in 1940 and covered the 
        Battle of Britain;
Whereas, following the entry of the United States into World War II in December 
        1941, Pyle covered every major American campaign in the European 
        theater, including in North Africa, Sicily, Italy, and France;
Whereas war reporting by Pyle during World War II consistently celebrated the 
        sacrifices, courage, and determination of the common soldier (commonly 
        known as a ``grunt'') of the United States;
Whereas Pyle lived and worked among the soldiers of the United States and shared 
        in the toils, endeavors, and challenges of those soldiers, including 
        facing enemy fire;
Whereas Pyle received the Pulitzer Prize in 1944 ``for distinguished war 
        correspondence during the year 1943''; and
Whereas Pyle, while traveling with soldiers of the United States that were 
        fighting on the Japanese island of Ie Shima during the Okinawa campaign, 
        was killed by Japanese machine gun fire on April 18, 1945: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates August 3, 2018, as ``National Ernie Pyle 
        Day'';
            (2) recognizes contributions made by Ernie Pyle to 
        journalism in the United States; and
            (3) celebrates the legacy of Ernie Pyle as one of the most 
        respected and beloved war correspondents in the history of the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HOWELL M. RAMSEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D21-757

September 15, 2021

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit 

Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.

Howell M. Ramsey, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# C_2017277EN.01000101.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 277/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.

OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.

OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.

OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.

OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.

OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of

Chief Executive Officer

of Wyndham International, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and
accompanies this annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Wyndham International, Inc. (the Issuer).



I, Fred J. Kleisner, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:    March 8, 2004.



/s/    Fred J. KleisnerName:    Fred J. Kleisner




Subscribed and sworn to before
me

this 8th day of March 2004.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    Camaleta M. Roseman  
|Name:    Camaleta M. Roseman
|Title:    Notary Public     



My commission expires: 05-24-04



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by
the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# 777

U.S.Departmentof Energy June1999 EMISSION RESULTS FOR WATER HEATERS The water heater environmental analysisuses avariant ofEIA's National Energy Modeling System (NEMS), called NEMS-EPCA. Although NEMS-EPCA only forecasts through 2020, theNational Energy Savings (NES) from theproposed appliance standards are provided through 2030. Results are therefore, presented cumulatively through 2020 as well asthrough 2030. The extrapolation to 2030 keeps emission reductions constant from 2020 to 2030. The cumulative emissions reductions are summed over the power and household sectors. The annual carbon emission reductions range up to 3.0 Mt in 2030 and theNO, emissionsreductions extend up to 6.0 ktby 2030.',2 Cumulative emission savingsfrom 2003-2020 and from 2003-2030 are presented in the following tables: Cumulative Emissions Reductions 2003- 2020: Household and Power Sectors TrialStandard Emission 1 2 3 4 Carbon (Mt) 8.6 27.1 43.5 85.0*

NOx (kt) 29.6 91.8 147.3 206.8* SO2(kt) 1.9t 9.9t 20.9t 25.8t
Cumulative Emissions Reductions 2003- 2030: Household and Power Sectors TrialStandard Emission 1 2 3 4 Carbon

### (Mt)

NOx (kt) So2 (kt) Ad z
*Results only include household emissions reductions because the overall difference in electricity generation for imposed water heater standard 4 is tiny, yielding marginal emission rates that are highly unstable and possess a low level ofconfidence. tResults only include household emissions reductions because SO 2emissions from power plants are capped by clean air legislation, implying emissions will only be negligibly affected by possible water heater standards.

'Mt =Million metric tons 2kt = Thousand metric tons 

### 1
PUBLIC LAW 111–173—MAY 27, 2010 124 STAT. 1215 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5014 (S. 3162): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

May 12, considered and passed House. 

May 18, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–173 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To clarify the health care provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs that constitutes minimum essential coverage. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS THAT CONSTITUTES 

MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (v) of section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 1501(b) of 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is amended to 

read as follows: 

‘‘(v) a health care program under chapter 17 or 

18 of title 38, United States Code, as determined by 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination with 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 

Secretary,’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect as if included in section 1501(b) of the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Approved May 27, 2010. 

26 USC 

5000A note. 

Ante, p. 248. 

May 27, 2010 

[H.R. 5014] 


etreine on DSKHP91QD1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
#### § 208.406 Ordering activity responsibilities.
# C_2017111EN.01000601.xml

| 8.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 111/06)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Belgium

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 200th anniversary of the University of Liège

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The inner part of the piece represents the logo of the University of Liege, with the dates 1817 — 2017 below, surrounded by the inscription 200 ANS UNIVERSITE DE LIEGE — 200 YEARS UNIVERSITY OF LIEGE and the country indication BE. The mintmark of Brussels, a helmeted head of the Archangel Michael and the mint directors’ mintmark, the coat of arms of the municipality Herzele, are located respectively on the right and left of the country indication.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 200 000 coins

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : April 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
#### 225.7702 Acquisitions not subject to the enhanced authority to acquire products or services from Afghanistan.
#### Jerome Garf, Respondent, v George E. Hall et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 18, 1978, entered upon default, which granted the plaintiffs motion to strike the defendants’ affirmative defense and (2) an order of the same court, entered May 25, 1978, which denied the defendants’ motion (a) to vacate the order dated May 18, 1978 and (b) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Appeal from order dated May 18, 1978 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order entered upon default. Order entered May 25, 1978 modified, by deleting the provision denying that part of the defendants’ motion which was to vacate the order of May 18, 1978, and substituting therefor a provision granting said branch of the motion. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. An indemnification agreement was raised as an affirmative defense to the personal injury action. Since it is unclear what is covered by the agreement, the question *880should be determined at a new trial as was previously ordered by this court (see *Garf v Hall,*61 AD2d 819). Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Rabin and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
-  (Development & Expansion) FAQs (Revised October 3, 2014)PDF (482K)
(Development & Expansion) FAQs Addendum 1 (September 19, 2014)PDF (291K) 
-  (Development & Expansion) FAQs  Addendum 2 (October 3, 2014)PDF (202K)