alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 43 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall of 

the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to be 

conducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the Honorable John Sidney 

McCain, III, late a Senator from the State of Arizona. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 27, 2018 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection 

with memorial services to be conducted in the rotunda 

of the Capitol for the Honorable John Sidney McCain, 

III, late a Senator from the State of Arizona. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer the catafalque which is situ4 ated in the Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center 

5 to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such catafalque may 

6 be used in connection with services to be conducted there 

7 for the Honorable John Sidney McCain, III, late a Senator 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 43 ATS 

1 from the State of Arizona and formerly a Representative 

2 from that State. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Lehigh Valley Railway Company for the appointment of Commissioners to ascertain and determine the points and manner of crossing the tracks and lands of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company in the city of Buffalo.

(Argued June 19, 1883 ;

decided June 29, 1883.)

*Daniel H. McMillan*for appellant.

*George J. Sicard*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

*“*The order is affirmed on the ground that the question of the point of crossing may be tried before the commission and will be subject to review.”

All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.

Order affirmed.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 26 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for the unveiling of the American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action 

(POW/MIA) Chair of Honor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2017 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. RUBIO, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

ROUNDS, Mr. WARNER, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Ms. 

DUCKWORTH, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. BROWN, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Ms. CORTEZ MASTO) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for the unveiling of the American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) Chair of 

Honor. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR UNVEILING 

4 OF AMERICAN PRISONERS OF WAR/MISSING 

5 IN ACTION (POW/MIA) CHAIR OF HONOR. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used for an 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 26 ATS 

1 event on November 8, 2017, to unveil the American Pris2 oners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) Chair of 

3 Honor. 

4 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

5 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

6 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

7 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Federal Register

**Program Office:**Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education**CFDA Number:** 84.116Q**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants**Also Known As:** Spatial Computing Program (CESC)

Program Description

The Center of Excellence in Spatial Computing Grant Program provides funding to eligible institutions of higher education (IHEs) to increase the number of highly qualified Americans available for hire within the high-tech labor pool.

Types of Projects

Grants awarded under this program have performance periods of three years. To be considered for a grant in this program, the eligible institution(s) are expected to teach, improve, and disseminate spatial computing knowledge and skills required to increase the number of highly qualified Americans available to hire within the high-tech labor pool.

There is one absolute priority and one competitive preference priority in this competition.

Absolute Priority:

To be considered for a grant under this absolute priority, an eligible institution must include in its application—

- (a) The member IHEs that constitute the consortium that will support the advancement of spatial computing;
- (b) A description of how best practices and curricula will be evaluated and shared with computer science and other relevant programs;
- (c) A description of how the consortium will establish leadership and competitiveness in spatial computing, including how it will promote innovative processes for domestic manufacturing of spatial computing technology products;
- (d) A description of how the consortium will create educational and work placement opportunity programs to recruit, train, and retain underrepresented populations in the technology sector; and
- (e) A description of how the consortium will develop case studies and skill-based workforce training and company-based education programs in spatial computing.

Competitive Preference Priority:

*Leveraging Industry Partnerships to Provide Job-Embedded Experiences for Students in Spatial Computing Technologies* (up to 10 points). 

Projects that are designed to increase the proportion of underrepresented students with the skill sets necessary to meet industry demands in spatial computing by providing high-quality, paid, job-embedded opportunities that could potentially lead to stackable credentials in the field.

FIPSE Home
#### 244.301 Objective.

The administrative contracting officer (ACO) is solely responsible for initiating reviews of the contractor's purchasing systems, but other organizations may request that the ACO initiate such reviews.

[70 FR 67922, Nov. 9, 2005]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

IBEW LOCAL NO. 150 WELFARE FUND,
IBEW LOCAL NO. 150 PENSION FUND,
IBEW LOCAL NO. 150 SUPPLEMENTAL
PENSION FUND,

NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND,
LAKE COUNTY ELECTRICAL JOINT
APPRENTICESHIP & TRUST FUND,
IBEW LOCAL NO. 150 VACATION FUND,
NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-
MANAGEMENT COOPERATION FUND,
IBEW LOCAL NO. 150 ADMINISTRATIVE
MAINTENANCE FUND, and

IBEW LOCAL NO. 150 WORKING
ASSESSMENT FUND,

Case No. 12 CV 05207
Judge: James B. Zagel

Magistrate Judge: Nan R. Nolan

Plaintiffs,
Vs

AUTOMATION & NETWORK SOLUTIONS,
INC., an Illinois Corporation,

SE EES eae ee

Defendant
MOTION FOR DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT IN SUM CERTAIN

Plaintiffs, by one of their attorneys, JOHN F. ETZKORN, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 55,
respectfully request this Honorable Court to enter Judgment in a Sum Certain in favor of
Plaintiffs and against Defendant, AUTOMATION & NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., an
Illinois Corporation, (“ANSI”), in the amount of $20,009.34.

In support of their motion, thereof, Plaintiffs state as follows:

1. This case was filed on June 29, 2012.

2. Defendant ANSI, an Illinois corporation, was served on July 15, 2012 c/o Victoria
Rexfor, President and has not appeared or answered within the time allowed by law.

3


3. Pursuant to the Affidavit of Richard J. Wolf, Fund Auditor, attached hereto,
delinquent contributions are due in the amount of $19,170.84 based on an audit of the books and
records of ANSI.

4, Pursuant to the Affidavit of John F. Etzkorn, attached hereto, the Plaintiffs have
incurred $838.50 in reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in the course of prosecuting this action,
and such fees and costs are required to be paid by Defendant pursuant to the applicable trust
agreements and pursuant to ERISA at 29 U.S.C. Section 1132(g)(2).

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request this Court for relief as follows:

A. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant ANSI, in the sum of
$20,009.34 consisting of $19,170.84 amount due under an audit for the period from July 1, 2008
through October 31, 2011, and $838.50 in attorneys’ fees and costs.

B. This Court grants such other relief as it deems equitable and just under the
circumstances.

IBEW LOCAL NO. 150 WELFARE FUND et al,

By:___s/ John F, Etzkorn
One of their Attorneys

John F. Etzkorn

ARNOLD AND KADJAN

203 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1650
Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 236-0415
###### Editorial Note on Part 1553

#### Editorial Note:

Forms referenced in part 1553 do not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

#### 1553.216-71 EPA Form 1900-41B, CPAF Contract Individual Performance Event.

As prescribed in 1516.404-278, EPA Form 1900-41B shall be used to document individual performance events under CPAF contracts.
#### 2428.106 Administration.
#### David S. Kurz, Respondent, v. Norman Benninger, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property, arising out of a collision between the plaintiff’s automobile and the defendant’s automobile, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 8, 1962 after trial upon a jury’s verdict of $14,500 in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment reversed on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce to $6,000 the amount of the verdict in his favor and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the amount of damages awarded to the plaintiff was disproportionate to the injuries sustained. Hence, the jury’s verdict should be set aside as excessive to the extent indicated. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
10.2


 


Veeco
Instruments Inc.


 


2009 Supplemental
Management Profit Sharing Plan


 


August 20, 2009


 


·                  Based on H2 2009 Business Unit results as
measured by EBITA


 


·                  Payable when BU EBITA > 5% of
Revenue


 


·                  Group (PE & M&I) and Corporate awards
will be based on the weighted average results for relevant Business Units


 


·                  Supplemental Profit Sharing pool funded
by EBITA based on EBITA as a % of revenue (after taking into account the cost
of the additional bonus):


 


	
  EBITA as a % of Revenue

  	
   

  	
  Supplemental Profit Sharing Pool

  % of EBITA

  	
   

  
	
  Less than 5%

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
  %

  
	
  5% but less than 10%

  	
   

  	
  2

  	
  %

  
	
  10% but less than 15%

  	
   

  	
  4

  	
  %

  
	
  15% but less than 20%

  	
   

  	
  6

  	
  %

  
	
  EBITA % 20%+

  	
   

  	
  8

  	
  %

  



 


·               As with other profit sharing plans,
supplemental profit sharing awards will be distributed in proportion to each
individual’s target bonus.


 


·                  Supplemental Profit Sharing awards, if earned, will be paid with normal
2009 bonus (in mid-March 2010) but subject to recovery (“claw back”) in the
event the recipient voluntarily terminates his or her employment or is
terminated for cause on or before December 31, 2010.
#### Raymond P. Kane et al., Respondents, v. Frances M. Rodgers, Respondent, and Eleanor Hagelin et al., Appellants.

Interlocutory judgment, entered March 5, 1964, awarding plaintiffs beneficial interests in capital stock and other relief, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by amending the penultimate paragraph to provide for the prompt assessment of exemplary damages, if any, after reasonable notice, and the interlocutory judgment is otherwise affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs-respondents against defendants-appellants. The arrangement between plaintiffs-respondents and defendant-respondent Rodgers and through her with defendant-appellant Hagelin created an agency relationship with Rodgers and with Hagelin by reason of the joint relationship between Rodgers and Hagelin. This sufficed to make the written agreements with defendant-appellant Pisa enforeible by plaintiffs-respondents as principals, although they are not named in such agreements (see Restatement, Agency, 2d, §§ 147-149, 302; 2 H. Y. Jur., Agency, §§ 272, 318). The agreements provided that the incidents of ownership of the capital stock held by the eserowee were in the buyers, and that the stock was to be delivered to the eserowee by July 2, 1962. Hence, plaintiffs-respondents became the beneficial owners of part of the capital stock sold under the agreements (see, e.g., *Broderick*v. *Adamson,*270 N. Y. 260, 263-264; *Broderick*v. *Alexander,*268 N. Y. 306, 309-310). The Statute of Frauds, therefore, is no har, since the acts to be performed beyond a year concern only enforement of plaintiffs-respondents’ existing ownership rights under the written agreements. It was inappropriate to suspend the imposition of exemplary damages pending review of ■ compliance of defendant-appellant Pisa with the interlocutory judgment. Ample remedies exist for the enforcement of court orders. There should be a prompt assessment of any exemplary damages. Settle order on notice. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Yalente, Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24 - 0521 FRANK RAISER, M.D.,

Plaintiff, Appellee and Cross Appellant, v. ST. JAMES HEALTHCARE,

Defendant, Appellant and Cross -Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT
This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Lawrence E.**  **Henke,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M. R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this September 24, 2024.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Amanda Beckers Sowden, Ward E. Taleff, Timothy B. Strauch, Michael Albert Gawley, Lawrence E. Henke 09/24/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0521
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 4, 2021.

# PLACE:

 The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

      ( print page 7760)    
Dated: January 28, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-02155 Filed 1-28-21; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### 253.213-70 Completion of DD Form 1155, Order for Supplies or Services.

Follow the procedures at PGI 253.213-70 for completion of DD Form 1155.

[71 FR 3413, Jan. 23, 2006]
#### 29.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the policies and procedures regarding the exemption or immunity of Federal Government purchases and property from State and local taxation.
EXHIBIT 31(b)  CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  I, James A. Meer, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pharmos Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/  JAMES A. MEER

-------------------------

James A. Meer

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 21, 2006
# C_2016374EN.01000601.xml

| 13.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/6

---

Calls for proposals under the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 6388 (1) amending Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921)

1

(2016/C 374/06)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, is hereby launching two calls for proposals in order to award grants in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector:

| — | CEF-Transport-2016-MAP-Cohesion envelope, with an indicative budget of EUR 849,5 million, |
| --- | --- |

—

CEF-Transport-2016-MAP-Cohesion envelope, with an indicative budget of EUR 849,5 million,

| — | CEF-Transport-2016-MAP-General envelope, with an indicative budget of EUR 650 million. |
| --- | --- |

—

CEF-Transport-2016-MAP-General envelope, with an indicative budget of EUR 650 million.

The deadline for the submission of proposals is 7 February 2017.

7 February 2017

The complete texts of the calls for proposals are available on:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-transport/apply-funding/2016-cef-transport-calls-proposals

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 6388 of 7 October 2016 amending Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 establishing a Multi-Annual Work Programme 2014 for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020.

1

---