alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
237.102-71 Limitation on service contracts for military flight simulators. ( a ) *Definitions.* As used in this subsection— ( 1 ) *Military flight simulator* means any system to simulate the form, fit, and function of a military aircraft that has no commonly available commercial variant.
( 2 ) *Service contract* means any contract entered into by DoD, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees as defined in 41 U.S.C. 6701.
( b ) Under Section 832 of Public Law 109-364, as amended by Section 883(b) of Public Law 110-181, DoD is prohibited from entering into a service contract to acquire a military flight simulator. However, the Secretary of Defense may waive this prohibition with respect to a contract, if the Secretary— ( 1 ) Determines that a waiver is in the national interest; and
( 2 ) Provides an economic analysis to the congressional defense committees at least 30 days before the waiver takes effect. This economic analysis shall include, at a minimum— ( i ) A clear explanation of the need for the contract; and
( ii ) An examination of at least two alternatives for fulfilling the requirements that the contract is meant to fulfill, including the following with respect to each alternative: ( A ) A rationale for including the alternative.
( B ) A cost estimate of the alternative and an analysis of the quality of each cost estimate.
( C ) A discussion of the benefits to be realized from the alternative.
( D ) A best value determination of each alternative and a detailed explanation of the life-cycle cost calculations used in the determination.
( c ) When reviewing requirements or participating in acquisition planning that would result in a military department or defense agency acquiring a military flight simulator, the contracting officer shall notify the program officials of the prohibition in paragraph (b) of this subsection. If the program officials decide to request a waiver from the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (b) of this subsection, the contracting officer shall follow the procedures at PGI 237.102-71.
[72 FR 51193, Sept. 6, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 53156, Sept. 15, 2008; 76 FR 58137, Sept. 20, 2011]
2933.103 Protests to the agency. ( a ) The relevant contracting officer will be the point of contact for agency-level protests. Upon receipt of an agency level protest, the contracting officer immediately notifies the Director of Strategy and Administration within the OSPE and the Office of the Solicitor of the protest.
( b ) OSPE's Director of Strategy and Administration is the Agency Protest Official.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re: Upset Tax Sale of Lehigh :

County Tax Claim Bureau of :

Properties Held on :

September 15, 2021 :

: No. 1442 C.D. 2021

Appeal of: Ronald L. Clever :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, September 26, 2023

, having considered A ppellant ’ s application

for reargument, the application is DENIED

.
227.7202-1 Policy. ( a ) Commercial computer software or commercial computer software documentation shall be acquired under the licenses customarily provided to the public unless such licenses are inconsistent with Federal procurement law or do not otherwise satisfy user needs.
( b ) Commercial computer software and commercial computer software documentation shall be obtained competitively, to the maximum extent practicable, using firm-fixed-price contracts or firm-fixed-priced orders under available pricing schedules.
( c ) Offerors and contractors shall not be required to— ( 1 ) Furnish technical information related to commercial computer software or commercial computer software documentation that is not customarily provided to the public except for information documenting the specific modifications made at Government expense to such software or documentation to meet the requirements of a Government solicitation; or
( 2 ) Relinquish to, or otherwise provide, the Government rights to use, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display, or disclose commercial computer software or commercial computer software documentation except for a transfer of rights mutually agreed upon.
( d ) When establishing contract requirements and negotiation objectives to meet agency needs, the Government should consider the factors identified in 227.7203-2(b) and (c) for commercial computer software and computer software documentation, consistent with paragraph (c) of this section.
[60 FR 33482, June 28, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 17344, Mar. 22, 2023]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1403

XIAO ZUO, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-471-647) Submitted: September 27, 2006 Decided: November 1, 2006 Before MICHAEL, KING, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Howard T. Mei, LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD T. MEI, Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lindsay L. Chichester, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* As Zuo fails in her opening brief to set forth any argument concerning the denial of withholding of removal and CAT relief, we find that those claims have been abandoned on appeal. See Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Xiao Zuo, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). * To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Zuo fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 422 

Designating March 2, 2018, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2018 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. REED, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. 

CARPER, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. HASSAN, 

and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 2, 2018, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success and a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading 

intervention and providing additional resources for reading assistance, including through the programs authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations for library and literacy programs; and 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 422 ATS 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the National Education Association to designate March 2, the 

anniversary of the birth of Theodor Geisel (commonly 

known as ‘‘Dr. Seuss’’), as a day to celebrate reading: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 2, 2018, as ‘‘Read Across 

3 America Day’’; 

4 (2) honors— 

5 (A) all authors for their success in encour6 aging children to discover the joy of reading; 

7 and 

8 (B) the 21st anniversary of Read Across 

9 America Day; and 

10 (3) encourages— 

11 (A) parents, educators, and communities to 

12 read with children for at least 30 minutes on 

13 Read Across America Day and promote a love 

14 of reading and opportunities for all children to 

15 see themselves reflected in literature in honor of 

16 the commitment of the Senate to building a 

17 country of readers; and 

18 (B) the people of the United States to ob19 serve Read Across America Day with appro20 priate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
**MEMORANDUM**

**SUBJECT:** 6 - 18 - 12 Phone Conversation with AF&PA **FROM:** Marc Thomas

O ffice of Resource Conservation and Recovery **TO:** Docket ID No. EPA- HQ- RCRA- 2008 - 0329 On June 18, 2012, EPA, represented by Suzanne Rudzinski , Director of the Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, and Jim Berlow, Director of ORCR’s Program Implementation and Information Division, had a phone conversation with Tim Hunt and Susan Bodine of the American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA) . Below are the key issues raised during this call. EPA asked clarifying questions. 1) Pulp and Paper WW Treatment Sludges: - EPA should not be considering how sludges that are not burned are managed - Rule does not apply to sludges except when burn ed; therefore we must only consider if discard is occurring when burned - Sludges are managed like analogous wastes such as bark; rule says analogous is the test 2) OCC Rejects (aka paper processing residuals) - Should be considered for a regulatory det ermination or preamble language saying this material appears to meet legitimacy 3) C&D Materials that are not initially clean but have been processed - Industry has defined practices that should assure effective processing to meet legitimacy - EPA should provide reg determination or preamble language saying this material appears to meet legitimacy when processed in this manner 4) Treated Wood - EPA should provide reg determination or preamble language saying this material appears to meet legitimacy 5) C ontained Gas: - Industry concerned about generic impacts of RCRA waste finding on gases in pipes (not just NHSM materials) - Concerned with materials being transported by pipe for incineration/destruction by air emission controls (maybe other destruction s cenarios), not just energy recovery - Only workable/defensible solution is to state that RCRA position is that contained gas is gas in container when combusted
2417.204 Contracts. ( e ) ( 1 ) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) is authorized to approve contract periods for other than information technology contracts that exceed the 5-year limit set forth at FAR 17.204(e) that are not otherwise limited by statute (e.g., the Service Contract Act). Except as provided for in paragraphs (e)(2) and (4) of this section, the SPE shall approve any contract period that will exceed 5 years, including all option periods, prior to the award of the basic contract.
( 2 ) With regard to HUD indefinite-delivery contracts, the “contract period” requiring the SPE's prior approval in paragraph (e)(1) of this section shall mean the ordering period of a contract. Unless otherwise specified within the contract, the 5-year limit shall not apply to the period that any task or delivery order issued within the contract's ordering period extends beyond the final end date of the contract's ordering period, regardless of whether the performance period of the order causes the total period of the contract to exceed 5 years. The issuance of any such task or delivery order does not require the SPE's approval. Task or delivery orders with end dates extending beyond the ordering period of the contract may not exceed the final delivery date that the contracting officer has stated in the applicable indefinite-delivery FAR clause included in the contract (i.e., 52.216-20, “Definite Quantity,” paragraph (d); 52.216-21, “Requirements,” paragraph (f); or 52.216-22, “Indefinite Quantity,” paragraph (d)).
( 3 ) The SPE's authority described in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section shall not be used as the basis to retroactively increase or extend the period of any existing contract.
( 4 ) The SPE is not required to approve any option properly exercised pursuant to the FAR clause at 52.217-8, “Option to Extend Services,” that extends the contract period beyond 5 years; provided that the total length of all options exercised pursuant to FAR clause 52.217-8 may not exceed 6 months; and provided that exercise of any such options shall be in accordance with FAR 37.111. Any proposed extension of a contract beyond the 6-month maximum permitted by FAR 52.217-8 shall be considered a new requirement and shall be subject to the competition requirements of FAR part 6.
[77 FR 73528, Dec. 10, 2012]
# C_2017081EN.01000301.xml

| 16.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 March 2017

(2017/C 81/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0622 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4339 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87073 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5603 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0715 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1353 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,83 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3206 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5423 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9497 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3992 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4291 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2527 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5277 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5001 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 217,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8649 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3438 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4298 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 191,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7258 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,390 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,7435 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,453 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3553 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8010 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7475 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0622

JPY

Japanese yen

121,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4339

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87073

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5603

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0715

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1353

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,83

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3206

RON

Romanian leu

4,5423

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9497

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3992

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4291

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2527

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5277

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5001

KRW

South Korean won

1 217,28

ZAR

South African rand

13,8649

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3438

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4298

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 191,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7258

PHP

Philippine peso

53,390

RUB

Russian rouble

62,7435

THB

Thai baht

37,453

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3553

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8010

INR

Indian rupee

69,7475

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Department of Education Privacy Act Issuances**

The U.S. Department of Education safeguards personal privacy in its collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of records about individuals and makes such information available to the individual in accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. §552a).  

A "record," as defined by the Act, is information about an individual maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, the individual's education, financial transactions, or employment history, and that contains the individual's identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.  The Act defines "system of records" as any group of records under the Department's control from which information is retrieved by a personal identifier such as a person’s name or Social Security number.  

All Federal agencies are required to publish in the Federal Register each system of records when the system is established or changed.  These notices include the following:

- Name and location of the system; 
- Categories of individuals on whom records are maintained in the system;
- Categories of records maintained in the system;
- Each routine use of the records contained in the system, including categories of users and purpose of such use;
- Policies and practices of the agency regarding storage, retrievability, access controls, retention, and disposal of the records;
- Title and business address of the agency official responsible for the system of records;
- Agency procedures whereby an individual can be notified at his or her  request if the system of records contains a record pertaining to him or her;
- Agency procedures whereby an individual can be notified at his or her  request how he or she can gain access to any record pertaining to him or her  contained in the system of records, and how he or she can contest its contents; and 
- Categories of sources of records in the system. 

“The Department maintains a compilation of system of record notices (SORNs), which can be found here.”

- The Federal Register notices
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 3, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                  
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

June 30, 2006
#### 252.215-7008 Only One Offer.

As prescribed at 215.408(3), use the following provision:

# Only One Offer (DEC 2022)

(a) *Cost or pricing data requirements.* After initial submission of offers, if the Contracting Officer notifies the Offeror that only one offer was received, the Offeror agrees to—

(1) Submit any additional cost or pricing data that is required in order to determine whether the price is fair and reasonable (10 U.S.C. 3705) or to comply with the statutory requirement for certified cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C. 3702 and FAR 15.403-3); and

(2) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this provision, if the acquisition exceeds the certified cost or pricing data threshold and an exception to the requirement for certified cost or pricing data at FAR 15.403-1(b)(2) through (5) does not apply, certify all cost or pricing data in accordance with paragraph (c) of DFARS provision 252.215-7010, Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data, of this solicitation.

(b) *Canadian Commercial Corporation.* If the Offeror is the Canadian Commercial Corporation, certified cost or pricing data are not required. If the Contracting Officer notifies the Canadian Commercial Corporation that additional data other than certified cost or pricing data are required in accordance with DFARS 225.870-4(c), the Canadian Commercial Corporation shall obtain and provide the following:

(1) Profit rate or fee (as applicable).

(2) Analysis provided by Public Works and Government Services Canada to the Canadian Commercial Corporation to determine a fair and reasonable price (comparable to the analysis required at FAR 15.404-1).

(3) Data other than certified cost or pricing data necessary to permit a determination by the U.S. Contracting Officer that the proposed price is fair and reasonable *[U.S. Contracting Officer to provide description of the data required in accordance with FAR 15.403-3(a)(1) with the notification].*

(4) As specified in FAR 15.403-3(a)(4), an offeror who does not comply with a requirement to submit data that the U.S. Contracting Officer has deemed necessary to determine price reasonableness or cost realism is ineligible for award unless the head of the contracting activity determines that it is in the best interest of the Government to make the award to that offeror.

(c) *Subcontracts.* Unless the Offeror is the Canadian Commercial Corporation, the Offeror shall insert the substance of this provision, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold defined in FAR part 2.

(End of provision)

[78 FR 65217, Oct. 31, 2013, as amended at 83 FR 30825, June 29, 2018; 84 FR 30950, June 28, 2019; 84 FR 33858, July 16, 2019; 87 FR 76997, Dec. 16, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; BRAIN Initiative: Kirschstein NRSA Individual 
Postdoctoral Fellowship (F32).
    Date: February 26, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Rebecca Steiner Garcia, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 
6149, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-4525, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#186b6c7d71767d6a6a587579717436767170367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0939485898e859292a08d81898cce8e8988ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 27, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-02296 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>