alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Brandy Lashay Cooks, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00149

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 202nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 12F

- 488

- 202 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to provide that Cooks pled not guilty, that Cooks was convicted by a jury

, and that the jury assessed punishment

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Brandy Lashay Cooks, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 5, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2008-0618

 Directorate Identifier: 2007NM355AD

MPD D622W001-9 --- 02/12

MPD D622W001-9 --- 06/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Timeline

The FY 2023 application for CCAMPIS grants is available.  

 Application available: May 31, 2023

  Deadline: July 31, 2023

Federal Register Notice

- Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year 2023 (May 31, 2023)    | PDF 
Current Application

The FY 2023 competition for the CCAMPIS Program is open from May 31, 2023 to July 31, 2023. All applicants are required to submit an  application online through Grants.gov.  Grants.gov is a single access point for over 1,000 grant programs offered by  federal and other grant-making agencies.

Tips and Assistance

On Wednesday, June 14, 2023 to assist applicants in developing successful grant proposals, the Department of Education is sponsoring an On-line Pre-Application Technical Assistance Workshop for the Child Care Access Means Parents in School (CCAMPIS) Program Competition. 

Click here to view the FY 2023 CCAMPIS Pre-Application Webinar slides.

Application Contacts

Harold Wells: (202) 453-6131

U. S. Department of Education, OPEChild Care Access Means Parents in School Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Washington, DC 20202

If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.  Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact persons.

Student Service Home | Discretionary Grant Application packages

  Last Modified: 07/10/2023
#### 26.303 Data collection and reporting requirements.

Executive Order 12928 requires periodic reporting to the President on the progress of departments and agencies in complying with the laws and requirements mentioned in the Executive order.
Exhibit
10.(b)


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in
this Registration Statement on Form N-4  (File
Nos. 333-116814 and 811-8108) of our report dated March 30, 2009 relating
to the financial statements, financial statement schedules and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
Protective Life Insurance Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and is included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 9
to the Registration Statement on Form N-4  (File
Nos. 333-116814 and 811-8108).  We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form N-4
of our report dated April 24, 2009, relating to the financial statements
of The Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which is included in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4
(File Nos. 333-116814 and 811-8108).


 





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Birmingham, AL


October 28, 2009
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:2
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:3
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:4
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:5
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:6
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:7
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:8
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:9
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:10
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:11
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/08/11 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:12
**Source Low**  **High Units**  **Cost Basis**  **Year Low**  **High Control Level**  **Based on Retrofits**  LADCO, 2005 1500 2000 $/ton 2003 1947 2597 70 to 90% Yes Taken from W RAP. WR AP, 2003 1500 2000 $/ton 2003 1947 2597 70 to 90% Yes Annualized cost. Cost basis year not specifed, presumed 2003. NESCAUM, 2005 1000 1500 $/ton 2004 1175 1762 90 to 95% Yes Annualized cost. Cost basis year not specifed, presumed 2004. NESCAUM, 2005 70 190 $/kW 2005 78 212 90 to 95% Yes Capital cost. Cost basis ysear not specified, presumed 2004 Khan, 2004 111 111 $/kW 2004 130 130 90% Yes Capital cost. Low and high costs not specified. Formula based. Value is for 300 MW plant. DOE/EIA, 2009 118 150 $/kW 2008 107 136 90% Yes Capital cost. Based on CUECOST. Low is for 300 MW , high is 900 MW

. Hoskins, 2003 80 160 $/kW 2002 106 211 NA Yes Captial cost. 20 units in survey. Chicanowicz, 2004 56 185 $/kW 2003 73 240 NA Yes Capital cost. Varies by size range. 26 units surveyed. Marano, 2006 100 200 $/kW 2005 111 223 NA Yes Capital cost. Varies by size range. 72 units in survey **Ad justed to 2009**  **Original Comparison of A**  **nnualized Costs Estimates for EGU NOx Controls**

**Notes**

### Year PCI

2000 394.1 2001 394.3 2002 395.6 2003 402 2004 444.2 2005 468.2 2006 499.6 2007 525.4 2008 575.4 2009 521.9



## 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700**I n** **d e** **x** 

# Chemical **Engineering's Plant Cost Index** MOG, 2007. Note: The "Curve Fit of Data From Industry Survey" uses data point from Cichanowicz (2004).

## Low High CDPHE NESCAUM, 2005 78 212 Khan, 2004 130 130 DOE/EIA, 2009 107 136 Hoskins, 2003 106 211 Chicanowicz, 2004 73 240 Marano, 2006 111 223 $/kW

## 78 130

107 106

73 111 212

130 136 211 240 223

50 100 150 200 250 300**$ /** **k W** **( 2** **0 0** **9 $** **) ,** **A d** **j u** **s t** **e d** ***** 

# Comparison of SCR **Capital Costs**

Low High



## 0

**Reference**

.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Michael X. Hurley, Defendant.

— Motion for change of venue and for other relief denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Cayuga County (CPL 230.20, subd 2). If it develops during the *voir dire*that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature. (See *People v Di Piazza,*24 NY2d 342; *People v Hatch,*46 AD2d 721; *People v Sekou,*45 AD2d 982.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Witmer, JJ.
#### 28.311 Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under cost-reimbursement contracts.
# C_2017138EN.01000301.xml

| 3.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 May 2017

(2017/C 138/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0915 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4370 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84520 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6290 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0852 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3780 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,893 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2088 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8621 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4518 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4928 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4937 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5782 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5222 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 233,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4886 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5263 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4570 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 529,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7240 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,577 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,2300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,657 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4585 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4568 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,1025 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0915

JPY

Japanese yen

122,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4370

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84520

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6290

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0852

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3780

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,893

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2088

RON

Romanian leu

4,5495

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8621

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4518

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4928

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4937

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5782

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5222

KRW

South Korean won

1 233,65

ZAR

South African rand

14,4886

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5263

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4570

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 529,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7240

PHP

Philippine peso

54,577

RUB

Russian rouble

62,2300

THB

Thai baht

37,657

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4585

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4568

INR

Indian rupee

70,1025

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 211.7001 Procedures.

Follow the procedures at PGI 211.7001 for developing and distributing purchase requests, except for the requirements for Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (DD Form 448) addressed in 253.208-1.
225.7500 Scope of subpart. This subpart provides policies and procedures implementing the Balance of Payments Program. It applies to contracts for the acquisition of— ( a ) Supplies for use outside the United States; and
( b ) Construction to be performed outside the United States.
#### 1303.303 Reporting suspected antitrust violations.

Suspected anti-competitive practices and antitrust law violations, as described in FAR 3.301 and FAR 3.303, shall be reported to the Contract Law Division, by the HCO. A copy of the report shall be sent to the Procurement Executive concurrently with the submission to the Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Administration, Ethics Law and Program Division. The Office of the Assistant General Counsel will submit any required reports to the Attorney General.
#### In the Matter of James F. Kelly, Respondent, v. State Civil Service Commission, Appellant.

Judgment, entered March 16, 1964, directing the State Civil Service Commission to credit petitioner — on a promotion examination— with seniority credit for service as confidential attendant to a Justice of the Supreme Court, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and the petition dismissed, without costs. By virtue of section 168 of the Judiciary Law, petitioner, who had served as a confidential attendant to a Supreme Court Justice since April, 1946, was on January 1, 1962, classified as a court attendant in the competitive class of civil service. In April, 1963, petitioner took the competitive promotion examination for assistant deputy clerk and assistant special deputy clerk. The announcement of the examination provided that 0.2 points would be added to an applicant’s rating for each year served in the permanent competitive class in the Supreme Court in New York and Bronx Counties. Petitioner contended he was entitled to have added to his rating 0.2 points for each of his 15 years of service in the exempt class as confidential attendant to a Justice of the Supreme Court. The commission refused to allow credit for such service. Special Term held that the commission’s restriction of seniority credit to service in the permanent competitive class was arbitrary and capricious. We disagree. The commission has power to promulgate rules to carry out the provisions of the Civil Service Law and of the New York State Constitution, including rules for examinations and promotions, and when adopted such rules have the force and effect of law. (Civil Service Law, § 20; *Matter of O’Brien*v. *Lang,*18 A D 2d 140, 143, affd. 13 N Y 2d 688.) In restricting seniority *873credit to service in the permanent competitive class, the commission did not transcend its discretionary power to makes rules for determining the ratings of applicants. Nor was there an abuse of discretion, or any arbitrary and capricious action, in a determination that service in an exempt class should not be considered upon the same basis as service in the competitive class. Appointments in the competitive class are made, as far as practicable, upon the basis of competitive examinations. There is substance in the commission’s contention that awards for seniority credit on competitive promotion examinations to persons in the permanent civil service class are desirable incentives to induce competent persons to enter and remain in the competitive civil service. The same incentives are unnecessary in appointments to the exempt class. A distinction of treatment between service in the exempt class and in the competitive class thus has a logical and practical foundation and may not be regarded as arbitrary and capricious. Consequently, the commission’s denial of seniority credit to petitioner for years of service in the exempt class should not have been disturbed. Concur—Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### 237.7803 Procedures.

Contracting officers, at the request of the requiring activity, may issue a determination that the service life of a contract working dog has terminated if the conditions in 237.7802(b) have been documented by the requiring activity.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

 

MARLIS O’LEARY ) JURY DEMANDED 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) Case No.: 12-cv-05558 

 ) 

 v. ) Judge: Amy J. St. Eve 

 ) Magistrate: Susan E. Cox 

 ) 

WILL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, ) 

AND PAUL KAUPAS, in his official ) 

capacity as Sheriff of Will County. ) 

 Defendants. ) 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and by and 

through her counsel, Plaintiff Marlis O’Leary dismisses with prejudice any and all claims that 

were brought or that could have been brought in this action. Each party shall bear her or its own 

costs, including attorneys’ fees, in this litigation. 

/s/ Scott Fanning /s/ Patrick R. Moran (with consent) 

Uche O. Asonye - 6209522 Patrick R. Moran 

Scott Fanning - 6292790 Martin W. McManaman 

Attorneys For Plaintiff Marlis O’Leary Attorneys for Defendants Will County Sheriff’s 

Office and Paul Kaupas, in his official capacity as 

Sheriff of Will County 

Asonye & Associates Lowis & Gellen LLP 

39 South LaSalle Street, Suite 815 200 West Adams Street, Suite 1900 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 Chicago, Illinois 60606 

 

 

Case: 1:12-cv-05558 Document #: 45 Filed: 05/07/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:295
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on May 7, 2014, I served a true and accurate copy of the foregoing 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS upon the following by electronically filing it with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Patrick R. Moran 

Martin McManaman 

Lowis and Gellen 

 200 West Adams Street, Suite 1900 

 Chicago, Illinois 60606 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 Marlis O’Leary, 

 /s/ Scott Fanning 

One of Her Attorneys 

 

Case: 1:12-cv-05558 Document #: 45 Filed: 05/07/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:296
(May 25, 1962)

#### In the Matter of Lopez Capo v. Florence Kelley, as Presiding Justice of Children’s Court Division, Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, New York County, et al.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted to the extent of placing the appeal on the calendar of this court for June 21,1962, on condition that the appellant flies a note of issue and notice of argument for June 21, 1962, on or before June 11, 1962. Respondents’ points are to be served and filed on or before June 15, 1962. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
(October 13, 1964)

#### Mary S. El Khouri, Respondent, v. Naim T. El Khouri, Appellant.

—In an action by a wife to annul her marriage to the defendant, or, in the alternative, for a judicial separation, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from, so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, made April 6, 1964 upon reargument, as adhered to the original decision and as directed defendant to pay to plaintiff, *pendente lite,*$25 per week and a counsel fee of $400, sueh fee to be paid in two equal installments. Order modified: (1) by reducing the temporary alimony from $25 to $15 per week and the counsel fee from $400 to $150; and (2) by striking out the provisions *688directing the installment payments of the counsel fee. One half of the $150 counsel fee now directed to be paid shall be payable within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, and one half shall be payable when the action first appears on the Day Calendar for trial. As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, upon the present record, the awards for alimony and counsel fee made at Special Term were excessive to the extent indicated. The present awards, based on conflicting affidavits, should have no effect upon the trial court in its determination as to the permanent alimony, if ¿ny, and as to the additional counsel fee, if any. Its determination should rest exclusively upon the proof adduced at the trial *(Goldberg*v. *Goldberg,*20 A D 2d 806). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
United States Department of the Interior 

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 


Boqueron Field Office 


Carr. 301, KM 5.1. Bo. Corow 


P.O. Box 491 


Boqueron, PR 00622 


JUN 3 0 2009 

Ms. Grace Musumeci 

Chief, Environmental Review Section 

US EPA 

290 Broadway 

New York, NY 10007-1866 

Re: 2009 Puerto Rico WQS Regulations 

Dear Ms. Musumeci:· 

This is in reply to your May 2009 request for ESA consul tation regarding the proposed 

Puerto Rico Water Quality Standards revisions. Our comments are provided as technical 

assistance in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401. as 

amended; 16 U.S.c. 661 et seq.) and the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.c. 1531 ct seq. 

as amended). 

After receiving additional information from Dr. Izabela Wojtenko, we have the following 

comments: 

Endangered Species 

1) 	 The federally listed species within the range of water intakes and discharge areas 

~overed by the proposed regulations are: the endangered Antillean manatce 

(Trichechus mana/us mana/us), the Brown Pelican (Pe!ecan.us ()ccidenlalis 

occidentalis) and the Roseate Tern (Sterna douga/ii). 

2) 	 Section 1303.1 (1)(1 )&(2), deals with WQS for toxic substances to protect aquatic 

life. EPA has determined that the proposed changes to the PR WQS are not likely 

to adversely affect listed species under the purview of the Service. We corlcur 

with that determination; thus no further consultation with the Service under 

Section 7 of the Act is required. 

3) 	 It is impol1ant to note that NOAA Fisheries recently listed two Acropora coral 

species as threatened on May 9 2006 and the 4(d) nIle in 2008. It is important to 

take this species into consideration during the review of the PR and USVI WQS .. 
Ms. Musumeci 2 

Consultation pursuant to Section 7 (a)(2) for these two coral species should be 

conducted with NOAA Fisheries. 

Habitat Concerns 

1) 	 With regards to Class SC waters, this classification has a dissolved oxygen 

criteria of 4 mgtlt. Class SC waters cover several port areas to 10.35 miles 

seaward. These port areas are all fairly open and have good water circulation. 

There is 110 scientifically defensible reason as to why these waters have a 

Dissolved Oxygen WQS of 4 mgllt . We have consistently stated that for coastal 

waters and estuary waters, this is not protective. The pOliS of Mayaguez. Ponce, 

Yabucoa and GuayaniHa all have near shore coral reefs, some of which are in 

good health, The mean DO in seawater at 86 degrees Fahrenheit is 6.1 mgllt. A 

WQS of 4 mgllt does not meet the goals described in the Usage and Description 

for SC waters and is not protective of aquatic life, A minimum DO WQS of 5 

mgllt is more indicative of a system that will adequately support aquatic life. 

Thank you for .the opportunity to comment on this project, if you have any questions 

please contact Felix Lopez of my staff at 787 851 7297 x226,' 

t)j:I~~lyl ') ~MUfiiZ l 

Field Supervisor 

fhl 

cc: 

DNER, San Juan 

EPA. San Juan 

EQB, San Juan 

NMFS, Boqueroll
# CA2017042EN.01000101.xml

| 9.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 42/1

---

Notification of vacancy notice for Administrative Director (grade AD 14) of Eurojust — The Hague (The Netherlands) — 17/EJ/01

(2017/C 042 A/01)

Eurojust invites applications for the position of Administrative Director of Eurojust. Eurojust was established in 2002 to enhance the effectiveness of the Member States’ competent authorities to deal with serious cross-border and organised crime. Eurojust is formed by a College of prosecutors, judges or police officers who are responsible for its organisation and operation. The Administrative Director is responsible, under the supervision of the President of the College, for the day-to-day administration of Eurojust and for staff management. Please consult our website for the detailed vacancy notice and procedure for application:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

The deadline for submission of applications is 17 March 2017 at midnight CET.

---
#### 2812.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the acquisition of commercial items.

Contracting officers shall include the provisions and clauses at JAR 2852.212-4 in all solicitations and contracts for the acquisition of commercial items that require FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Items.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

AF Holdings LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05081

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

John Doe

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, November 6, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Motion to quash [11] is

denied. Status hearing held on 11/6/2012. Status hearing set for 12/6/2012 at 9:00 a.m.

Mailed notice (gds)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05081 Document #: 14 Filed: 11/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:83