alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Exploratory Clinical Trials of Mind and Body Interventions (MB).                    

*Date:*                         March 2-3, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Pamela Jeter, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, NCCIH, NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892-547, 301-435-2591,                         *pamela.jeter@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 22, 2021.

Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-02282 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## Legislation

-  Section 102(b)(6) of the Fulbright-Hays Act    Word  (88K) |  PDF  (87K);  22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6)

## Regulations

- 34 CFR 662
- Administrative Regulations (EDGAR)  in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

IFLE Home
## FY 2023

- Project abstracts for new awards (Fund Down the Slate):    PDF  (272K)
- Project abstracts for new awards (FY 2023 Competition):    PDF  (830K) 

## FY 2022

- Project abstracts for new awards:    PDF  (1.1M)

## FY 2021

- Project abstracts for new awards:    PDF  (608K)

## FY 2020

- Project abstracts for new awards:      PDF  (1.2MB)

## FY 2019

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (121K) 

## FY 2018

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (160K) |  PDF  (248K)

## FY 2017

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (213K) |  PDF  (746K)

## FY 2016

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (184K)

## FY 2015

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (2.04MB)

## FY 2014

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (392K)

## FY 2013

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (273K) |  PDF  (374K)

## FY 2012

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (267K) |  PDF  (400K)

## FY 2011

- Project abstracts for new awards:    MS Word  (244K) |  PDF  (334K)

## FY 2010

- Project abstracts:    MS Word  (561K) |  PDF  (806K)

## FY 2009

- Project abstracts:    MS Word  (220K) |  PDF  (183K)

Institutional Service Home
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Paul R. Flanders                                  
|------------------------------------------------------
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|November 12, 2003
# C_2017152EN.01000701.xml

| 16.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/7

---

Information to be provided pursuant to Article 5(2)

Modification of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

(Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19) and Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 303))

(2017/C 152/06)

I.1   Name and address of the EGTC

Name and address of the EGTC

Registered name: Agrupación Europea de Cooperación Territorial DUERO – DOURO (DUERO-DOURO European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation)

Registered name

Registered office: Plaza Egido s/n; Trabanca, Salamanca (37173), Spain

Registered office

I.2   Duration of the addition:

Duration of the addition:

Duration of the grouping
  : undefined

Duration of the grouping

I.3   First publication in the OJ: OJ/S S113 – 16.6.2009

First publication in the OJ:

I.4   Name and contact details of the new member:

Name and contact details of the new member:

Camarzana de Tera

---
(January 25, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ferdinand Guadalupe, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on April 5, 1977, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Birns, Fein, Sullivan and Lupiano, JJ.
#### 17.106 Procedures.
From: "Antonella Zanobetti" <AZANOBET@hsph.harvard.edu>

To: Zachary Pekar/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Pradeep Rajan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/22/2011 11:15 AM

Subject: Re: Request for adjusted (weighted) city

- specific effect estimates for use in the ozone NAAQS risk

assessment (and clarification on the nature of the stud y areas used)

Hi Zach,

I attach the paper that show how to compute these estimates, I used formula 1 and 2

thanks

Antonella

Antonella Zanobetti, PhD

Senior Research Scientist

Department of Environmental Health

Exposure, Epidemiology, and Risk Program

Harvard School of Public Health

Landmark Center

- Rm. 415 K West

401 Park Drive

Boston, MA 02215

USA

phone +1 617 384 8751

fax +1 617 384 8745

email azanobet@hsph.harvard.edu

>>> Zachary Pekar <Pekar.Zachary@epamail.epa.gov> 12/22/2011 10:26 AM >>>

It does

- one follow

- up question. If we wanted to formally describe

those shrunken estimates, how would we describe them (e.g., MLE random

effects

- based estimates, with the random effects allowing for a

city

- specific effect to be intergrated into the estimate? I am sure that

is not quite right, but you see the type of descriptor I am wanting to

make sure we have). Just wanting to make sure we describe the shrunken

estimates correctly when presenting our methodology. Thanks!

zach

Zachary Pekar, MSPH, PhD

Human Health Risk Assessment

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

tele: (919) 541

- 3704

e

- mail: pekar.zachary @epa.gov(See attached file: urban study area definition

- MSA counties.xlsx)(See

attached file: city specific shrunken.xlsx)
#### 225.771 Prohibition on contracting or subcontracting with a firm that is owned or controlled by the government of a country that is a state sponsor of terrorism.

[79 FR 73489, Dec. 11, 2014]
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<S>                                                <C>
      MPSI Systems Limited....................................................U.K. Corporation
      MPSI Australia Pty. Ltd............................................Australia Corporation
      MPSI do Brasil........................................................Brazil Corporation
      MPSI Systems K.K....................................................Japanese Corporation
      MPSI Systems Pte. Ltd..............................................Singapore Corporation
      Shanghai MPSI Software Inc...........................................Chinese Corporation
      Management Planning Systems, Inc.....................................Oklahoma Corporation
      DataMetrix Inc.......................................................Oklahoma Corporation

      INACTIVE CORPORATIONS
      MPSI China Inc......................................................Delaware Corporation
      MPSI Surveys Inc....................................................Oklahoma Corporation
      MPSI Systems Canada Inc.............................................Canadian Corporation
      MPSI Systems GmbH.....................................................German Corporation
      MPSI Systems SARL.....................................................French Corporation
      Quest Systems International Inc......................................Delaware Corporation

      BRANCH OFFICES
         Seoul, South Korea...................................Branch of MPSI Systems Pte. Ltd.
         Johannesburg, South Africa.................Branch of Management Planning Systems Inc.
                                                            (d/b/a MPSI Africa Inc.)
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 18.5

LETTER RE:  CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE



West Texas Utilities  Company (WTU) 
Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended March 31, 1999


Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the  requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a  registrant's  independent  accountants  whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

As stated in Note 1 to the  financial  statements  of this Form 10-Q,  effective
January 1, 1999, WTU  incorporated  the five-year  average market related method
(the "Market  Method") in its calculation of pension costs.  Prior to January 1,
1999,  WTU utilized the market value of the pension  assets at September 30th in
its calculation of pension costs. The change was made to minimize the plan asset
market value  volatility  effect on WTU's recorded  pension costs.  Adopting the
Market  Method  did not have a  material  effect  on first  quarter  results  of
operations or financial position. The cumulative effect of the accounting change
to the Market Method was not material to first quarter  results of operations or
financial position.

A complete  coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the  preferability  of  accounting   principles  among  acceptable   alternative
principles  has not been  established  by the  accounting  profession.  Thus, we
cannot  make an  objective  determination  of whether  the change in  accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors,  including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective  basis,  and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the  opinion  that  WTU's  change  in method  of  accounting  is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which based upon the reasons stated
for the  change  and our  discussions  with  you is also  preferable  under  the
circumstances  in this  particular  case. In arriving at this  opinion,  we have
relied on the business  judgement and business  planning of your management.  We
have not audited the  application  of the change to the financial  statements of
any period subsequent to December 31, 1998. Further, we have not examined and do
not express any opinion with respect to your financial  statements for the three
months ended March 31, 1999.


Very Truly Yours

Arthur Andersen LLP
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 20 1 2

- NM

- 065

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
10 December, 2014

Mr. Steven L. Kellenburger

Director of Quality

Dynamic Airways

701 N Terminal SVC Road

Greensboro, NC, 27409

Dear Mr. Kellenburger:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 121.1117, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your November 19, 2014, exemption request on behalf of Dynamic Airways

(Dynamic) into the public docket (No. FAA-2014-0973), but we are unable to process your 

request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). In addition to the information previously submitted and for us to 

consider the request any further, you must send us the following information indicated below:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 If applicable, the specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your 

exemption outside the United States if applicable. 

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open during 

this period. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at 

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

You may submit the additional information to the FAA through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov, the Federal Docket Management System Web site using the 

public docket number assigned to your petition. Paper submission should be sent to this 

address: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Also, for additional 

instructions, you may visit http://www.faa.gov/regulations

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-4713.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure

§ 11.81
# C_2016363EN.01002601.xml

| 1.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/26

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.7995 — Deutsche Börse/London Stock Exchange Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 363/09)

On 28 September 2016, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7995 — Deutsche Börse/London Stock Exchange Group, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
# C_2016461EN.01003401.xml

| 10.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 461/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 461/34

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8317 — KKR/Calsonic Kansei)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 461/09)

1.

On 5 December 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration, pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1), by which KKR & Co. L.P. (‘KKR’, United States) will acquire indirect sole control over Calsonic Kansei Corporation (‘Calsonic Kansei’, Japan) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, by means of a purchase of shares.

2.

| — | KKR is a global investment firm offering a broad range of alternative asset funds and investment products in a variety of sectors, |
| --- | --- |

—

KKR is a global investment firm offering a broad range of alternative asset funds and investment products in a variety of sectors,

| — | Calsonic Kansei is a global auto parts supplier with a wide range of auto parts including Cockpit Module, climate control systems, engine cooling products, automotive compressors and exhaust systems. |
| --- | --- |

—

Calsonic Kansei is a global auto parts supplier with a wide range of auto parts including Cockpit Module, climate control systems, engine cooling products, automotive compressors and exhaust systems.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8317 — KKR/Calsonic Kansei, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
# C_2016427EN.01000101.xml

| 19.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8177 — AMC UK/Odeon and UCI Cinemas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 427/01)

On 15 November 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8177. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8177. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
## FY 2022

Number of new awards: 5Total new awards funded: $4,697,989.00
May 4, 2016

Mr. Talbot Martin, Esq.

Counsel for Operation Migration, Inc.

Barnett & Borth, LLC

800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200

Glenview, IL 60025

Dear Mr. Martin :

We have received your May 3, 2016 , corres pondence withdrawing your March 31

, 2016

petition on behalf o f Operation Migration for an exemption from §§ 61.113(a), 91.319(e), and

91.327(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA

- 2013

- 1075 ). No further action will

be taken on your petition.

Sincerel y,

/s/

James M. Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division