alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- > 

BEFORE THE "S* '•^'^^ I . 1 ^ i I f r'" I T 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - - ^«^ fc-i I . L ^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEB I 6 281 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Administrator, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Complainant 

V. 

Piedmont Airlines, Inc., 

Respondent 

FAA Docket CP08SO0010 

" J 

r~3 

1 1 

'' -I 

MOTION OF RESPONDENT 

PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC, , IV] 

FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES " ^ 

w ^ 

1. By Order served December 1, 2009, Administrative Law Judge Benkig ^ 

established a date for the hearing in this matter on April 6, 2010, and further set 

additional deadlines for procedural steps, to wit: February 12, 2010 for completion of 

discovery, March 1, 2010 for dispositive motions, and March 23, 2010 for exchange of 

witness lists, documents to be offered, and qualifications of expert witnesses. 

2. On January 15, 2010, Judge Benkin granted the motion of the Complainant for 

a continuance of the hearing to May 26, 2010. Neither the Complainant's motion nor 

the Judge's Order dealt with the remaining procedural deadlines. 

3. In light of the postponement of the hearing, Respondent moves that the 

remaining procedural deadlines be similarly continued, as follows: Discovery 

completion - April 2. 2010; dispositive motions - April 19, 2010; exchanges of 

documents - May 10, 2010. This would enable the matter to proceed on a more logical 

schedule, without the substantial gap between the preliminary steps and the hearing. 

1 
'~> 

4. Counsel for Complainant has consented to the suggested postponements. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent Piedmont Airlines, Inc. requests that this motion be 

granted, as described above. 

By: 

Dated: Februarys, 2010 

^</ X 

Mark W. Atwood 

Sher & Blackwell, LLP 

1850 M Street, N.W., Suite 900 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 463-2510 (tel) 

(202) 463-4950 (fax) 

Counsel for Respondent 

Piedmont Airlines, Inc. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

( hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Motion of Respondent were sent 

via facsimile to the following: 

Zachary Berman, Esq. 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11343 

Fax: 718-995-5699 

Honorable Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

East BIdg., Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

And via first-class mail to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W, 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Suite 2W10000 

Dated: Februarys, 2010
## Legislation

- Title VII, Part A, Subpart 4, Section 723 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended MS Word (42K) | PDF (19K)  The Master's Degree Programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities Program was authorized by the Higher Education Opportunity Act, 2008, which reauthorized and extended the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

## Regulations

- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) 34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99
- e-CFR --  Part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, And Audit Requirements For Federal Awards

Institutional Service Home
Dr. J. Michael Mullen
          Chancellor
          West Virginia Higher Education
          Policy Commission
          1018 Kanawha Boulevard East
          Suite 700
          Charleston, WV 25301

Dear Dr. Mullen:

Thank you for your letter to President Bush urging funding increases            for GEAR UP and other postsecondary programs that the Department of            Education administers to help students from disadvantaged families prepare            for and succeed in college. I have been asked to respond on the President's            behalf.

While we have not made any decisions regarding budget policy for FY            2003 or beyond, we will continue to give priority to programs that are            effective in achieving the President's goal of closing the gap in educational            opportunities. The President's request for the GEAR UP program for FY            2002, $227 million, fully supports all currently funded cohorts of students            and allows an additional 144,000 students to be served. This request            is currently pending before Congress.

As you know, under GEAR UP, States and partnerships provide early intervention            services to whole grades of students as they move through middle and            high schools, and they provide financial assistance so GEAR UP students            can successfully pursue a postsecondary education. GEAR UP funding has            increased by nearly 150 percent in only two years -- from $120 million            in 1999 to $295 million in 2001. We are now serving more than 970,000            students in 45 States, due in large part to the commitment of hundreds            of universities, businesses, and community organizations, as you mention.            To determine whether GEAR UP is achieving its purposes and warrants            additional resources, we have committed $4.2 million to an evaluation            of the program.

As we develop our budget for FY 2003, we will continue to look at programs            like GEAR UP, TRIO, Pell Grants, and others in an effort to determine            how Federal funds can be best used to serve disadvantaged students.

| | Sincerely,
              /s/
              William D. Hansen
| | ------------------------------------------------------------

|Last Modified: 01/29/2010
|-------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

          - [Docket No. DHS-2021-0006]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        In consultation with public health officials and consistent with the January 21, 2021                         *Executive Order on Promoting COVID-19 Safety in Domestic and International Travel*                         and the January 29, 2021 Order by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announcing a requirement for persons to wear masks while on conveyances and at transportation hubs, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security on January 27, 2021, issued a                         *Declaration of a National Emergency Requiring Actions to Protect the Safety of Americans Using and Employed by the Transportation System*                         (“declaration”). The declaration finds that a national emergency exists and directs the Transportation Security Administration to take certain actions to promote safety in and to secure the transportation system and to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 through the transportation system. The text of the declaration is set out below.                    

Christina E. McDonald,

Federal Register Liaison, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

      ( print page 8218)          ( print page 8219)    

BILLING CODE 9110-9M-P

[FR Doc. 2021-02359 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-9M-C
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts
Introduction Title             PageList of             FiguresConversion             FactorsAbstractIntroductionSettingMethodsBathymetrySidescan             Sonar Seismic             Profiles SedimentsBottom             Photography Data             CatalogSummaryAcknowledgmentsReferences             Cited Contacts
Click on figures for larger           images.
Figure 1. Cape Cod and the Islands and the             study area off Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. Figure 2. Edgartown Harbor, the boundary of             the study area (red line), and local physiographic         features.
The imagery, digital terrain models (DTMs), interpretive data layers,       and supplemental data presented herein were derived from sidescan-sonar       and multibeam and single-beam echo-sounder data collected in the vicinity       of Edgartown Harbor, a main port and anchorage on Martha's Vineyard,       Massachusetts, and from the seismic-reflection profiles and stations       occupied to verify these acoustic data (fig.       1). Basic data layers show backscatter intensity, sea-floor       topography, and sun-illuminated shaded relief; interpretive layers show       the distributions of sea-floor features and buried channels of a late       Pleistocene drainage system. Presented supplemental and verification data       include Boomer and Chirp seismic-reflection profiles, sediment grain-size       analyses, and a gallery of still photographs of the seabed.

The sidescan-sonar and shallow-water multibeam data, which together       cover approximately 37.3 km2 of sea floor, were collected during 2004 as       part of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)       hydrographic survey H11346 (figs. 1, 2). Although originally collected for charting purposes,       these data provide a fundamental framework for research and management       activities along this part of the Massachusetts coastline (Noji and       others, 2004), show the composition and terrain of the seabed, and provide       information on sediment transport and benthic habitat.

This publication is the fifth in a series of digital reports describing       the sea-floor geology around Cape Cod. The first focused on the area off       the eastern shore of the outer Cape (Poppe and others, 2006); the second       on Quicks Hole, a passage through the Elizabeth Islands (Poppe and others,       2007a); the third on Great Round Shoal Channel at the eastern entrance to       Nantucket Sound (Poppe and others, 2007b); and the fourth on Woods Hole, a       passage between Cape Cod and the Elizabeth Islands (Poppe and others,       2008). 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/intro.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:07:06 EDT
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Dr. Nicholas Angelopoulos v. 

Keystone Orthopedic 

Specialists, S.C. et al 12-cv-05836 Defendants Keystone Orthopedic Specialists, S.C.; WACHN, LLC; & Martin R. Hall, M.D. Bevin Brennan Pedersen & Houpt 161 North Clark Street, Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 6271982 (312) 641-6888 April 11, 2017 ✔

✔

✔

✔

Bevin M. Brennan
Exhibit 23.

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Wegener Corporation
Duluth, Georgia

    We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration
Statements (File No. 33-45390, No. 33-42007,  No. 33-62849,  No. 333-08017,  No.
333-27527,  No.  333-29887 and No.  333-29889) of our reports dated November 14,
1997 relating to the consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Wegener
Corporation and  Subsidiaries  appearing in the Company's  Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended August 29, 1997.




Atlanta, Georgia                                            BDO Seidman, LLP
December 11, 1997
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-773]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before March 8, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before March 8, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on December 18, 2020, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2898 Manufacturers Road, Greensboro, North Carolina 27406-4600, applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleRemifentanil
9739
II
 The company plans to import the above-controlled substance as the Federal Drug Administration-approved drug product in finished dosage form for commercial distribution to its customers. Approval of permit applications will occur only when the registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-02315 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
22.604-1 Statutory exemptions. Contracts for acquisition of the following supplies are exempt from the statute: ( a ) Any item in those situations where the contracting officer is authorized by the express language of a statute to purchase “in the open market” generally (such as commercial products and commercial services, see part 12); or where a specific purchase is made under the conditions described in 6.302-2 in circumstances where immediate delivery is required by the public exigency.
( b ) Perishables, including dairy, livestock, and nursery products.
( c ) Agricultural or farm products processed for first sale by the original producers.
( d ) Agricultural commodities or the products thereof purchased under contract by the Secretary of Agriculture.
[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 4944, Feb. 18, 1988; 60 FR 48248, Sept. 18, 1995; 79 FR 24205, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 61028, Nov. 4, 2021]
237.7002 Area of performance and distribution of contracts. Follow the procedures at PGI 237.7002 for— ( a ) Defining the geographical area to be covered by the contract; and
( b ) Distributing copies of the contract.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

PYRAMID PACKAGING, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 4420

)

PYRAMID PACKAGING, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This trademark action against a defendant that has adopted a name identical to that for which

plaintiff has a federally registered mark has produced some troubling developments during its short

life. Just about three weeks after its June 6, 2012 filing, a Syracuse, New York lawyer sought and

was granted an extension of time for defendant to file a responsive pleading, and at the time of grant

this Court asked counsel whether defendant had any assertedly meritorious defenses. But instead

of responding to that request, the same lawyer has tendered a proposed motion and supporting

memorandum seeking dismissal of the action, with the proposed presentment date of that motion set

for July 20.

It is at that point that a red flag has popped up. According to defense counsel's sworn

declaration that accompanied the original motion for extension, service of process on his client had

been "delayed" because service had been sought to be made on another company (located in North

Carolina to boot), and that company had then transmitted the papers to defendant. Now counsel has

advanced that identical contention in the proposed motion to dismiss (which is mistakenly

characterized as a Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 12(b)(6) motion, even though its contention is that

Case: 1:12-cv-04420 Document #: 20 Filed: 07/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:175
defendant "has not been properly joined as a party to this action." But those assertions are flatly 1

refuted by the sworn Affidavit of Process Server that plaintiff has just filed (Dkt. 17), which reflects

direct service on defendant through its General Manager John Pasquariello on June 11 (just five days

after suit was filed), and at the very same location (604 Corporations Park, Scotia, New York 2

12302) that counsel's new Memorandum of Law expressly identifies as defendant's proper address.

In any event, defense counsel has certainly not made a case for a further extension of time,

nor has he been responsive to this Court's inquiry about the existence of any claimed meritorious

defense. All of this will be discussed at the July 20 presentment date. 

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: July 20, 2012.

Defense counsel has demonstrated even more confusion in his current filing. It is labeled 1

"Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law", and its initial ground for the motion is headed "Plaintiff Has Not

Been Properly Joined as a Party," even though in both instances the reference should of course be

to "Defendant" rather than "Plaintiff." And as such, the motion itself is really advanced under

Rule 12(b)(2) rather than 12(b)(6).

 

 So much for the purportedly "delayed" service.

2

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-04420 Document #: 20 Filed: 07/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:176
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SecureCare Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis
Nasto, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify to my
knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate, effective as of
May 14, 2009.

| |                                       
| | --------------------------------------
| | /s/ Dennis Nasto                      
| |                                       
| | Dennis Nasto                          
| | Chief
  Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal
  Executive Officer)       

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SecureCare Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by SecureCare
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Hong Cassley, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04833

Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo

Garmin International, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 27, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Plaintiff's motion to

voluntarily dismiss this case, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, without

prejudice [4] is granted. Scheduling conference set for 8/7/12 is stricken. Civil case

terminated. Mailed notice(tlp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04833 Document #: 6 Filed: 06/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:34