alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 100% Owned Subsidiaries:                |                             |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
| Wound Care Innovations, LLC             | Nevada limited liability company |
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
| BioPharma Management Technologies, Inc. | Texas corporation                |
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
| Resorbable Orthopedic Products, LLC     | Texas limited liability company  |
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
| Secure eHealth, LLC                     | Nevada limited liability company |
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
|                                    |                             |
| 50% Owned Joint Venture:                |                             |
|                                    |                             |
| Pharma Technology International, LLC    | Nevada limited liability company |
#### REIMER v. GREEN ROOM CLUB.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

1. Compromise and Settlement—Mistake of Fact—Burden of Proof.

The burden of showing by clear and satisfactory proof a material mistake of fact, vitiating a compromise and settlement, rests upon the party who asserts it.

¶ 1. See Compromise and Settlement, vol. 10, Cent Dig. § 91.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Twelfth District.

Action by Gustave Reimer against the Green Room Club. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Robert L. Turk, for appellant.

Maurice P. Davidson, for respondent.

FREEDMAN, P. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, who is a caterer, for food sold and services rendered and money paid out for defendant. The defendant set up a general denial, payment, and an accord and satisfaction. It was admitted on the trial that the board charged for in plaintiff’s bill of particulars was furnished, and *562also the claim for money paid out for the defendant. The defendant offered testimony of several conversations had between the plaintiff and the president of the defendant, leading up to a final settlement, which finally culminated by the payment by the defendant to the plaintiff of the sum of $150, for which plaintiff gave a writing as follows:

> “Received of the Green Room Club the sum of $150, being payment in full of all demands of whatsoever name or nature covering provisions, help, personal services of self and wife. G. Reimer.

> “New York, May 5th, 1903.

> “Witness: J. T. Abbets.”

The learned trial judge in the court below, in his opinion, concedes that there was a settlement between the parties, and that the sum of $150 was accepted by the plaintiff as an accord and satisfaction, but, states “that there was á mutual mistake of facts,” and describes that mistake to be an omission on the part of the plaintiff of a charge amounting to $'46.29, and gives judgment for that amount. I have carefully read thetestimony contained in.the record, and I fail to find any testimony tending to show this omission, or anything whereby the trial court could have arrived at that opinion. It was never assumed or admitted by the defendant that plaintiff’s account was a correct one. It was because there was-a .dispute as to its correctness that caused the negotiations to take place, and which finally resulted in an agreement entered into with the plaintiff that a payment' of $150 should be in full settlement of all matters in difference. The.plaintiff himself did not testify to any'mistake in the account as presented by him,'and'the .testimony of the witness Merly, referred to by the trial judge in his opinion, is far from showing a mistake. The burden of showing a material mistake rests upon the party who asserts it, and it must be made out by clear and satisfactory proof. Southard v. Curley, 134 N. Y. 148, 31 N. E. 330, 16 L. R. A. 561, 30 Am. St. Rep. 642. , Neither by pleading nor in proof did the plaintiff entitle himself to a judgment.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 20. Sidescan-sonar imagery produced from data collected       during National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration survey H11346.       Light tones indicate hard returns and generally coarser grained sediments;       dark tones indicate softer returns and generally finer grained sediments.       

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig20.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:21:05 EDT
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5096 September Term, 2022

1:21-cv-02581-UNA

Filed On: September 13, 2022

David Hall Crum,

Appellant

v.

Ronna Lee Beck, Judge, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Henderson and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit

Judge 

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief and statement of issues filed by appellant. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed on March 28,

2022 be affirmed. Appellant has not shown any error based on the district court’s

dismissal for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). See SEC v.

Banner Fund Int’l, 211 F.3d 602, 613 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (the court need not consider

“asserted but unanalyzed” arguments) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted);

Jones v. Kirchner, 835 F.3d 74, 79 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (Rule 8 requires the pleadings to

“give the defendants fair notice of what the claim is and the grounds upon which it

rests”). Nor has appellant shown any error in the district court’s conclusion that the

judicial and prosecutorial defendants are entitled to immunity from any purported claim

for damages. See Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (per curiam)

(applying judicial immunity in damages suit against D.C. Superior Court judges);

Atherton v. D.C. Office of Mayor, 567 F.3d 672, 686 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (“prosecutors are

entitled to absolute immunity for conduct intimately associated with the judicial phase of

the criminal process”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5096 September Term, 2022

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
#### 252.219-7011 Notification to delay performance.

As prescribed in 219.811-3 (3), use the following clause:

# Notification To Delay Performance (JUN 1998)

The Contractor shall not begin performance under this purchase order until 2 working days have passed from the date of its receipt. Unless the Contractor receives notification from the Small Business Administration that it is ineligible for this 8(a) award, or otherwise receives instructions from the Contracting Officer, performance under this purchase order may begin on the third working day following receipt of the purchase order. If a determination of ineligibility is issued within the 2-day period, the purchase order shall be considered canceled.

(End of clause)

[63 FR 33588, June 19, 1998]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,681
<SECURITIES>                                       185
<RECEIVABLES>                                      267
<ALLOWANCES>                                        46
<INVENTORY>                                        851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,809
<PP&E>                                             959
<DEPRECIATION>                                     826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              410
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,128
<OTHER-SE>                                       (379)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,159
<SALES>                                          1,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,312
<CGS>                                            1,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (252)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (252)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### 252.229-7011 Reporting of Foreign Taxes—U.S. Assistance Programs.

As prescribed in 229.170-4, use the following clause:

# Reporting of Foreign Taxes—U.S. Assistance Programs (SEP 2005)

(a) *Definition. Commodities,* as used in this clause, means any materials, articles, supplies, goods, or equipment.

(b) Commodities acquired under this contract shall be exempt from all value added taxes and customs duties imposed by the recipient country. This exemption is in addition to any other tax exemption provided through separate agreements or other means.

(c) The Contractor shall inform the foreign government of the tax exemption, as documented in the Letter of Offer and Acceptance, country-to-country agreement, or interagency agreement.

(d) If the foreign government or entity nevertheless imposes taxes, the Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer and shall provide documentation showing that the foreign government was apprised of the tax exemption in accordance with paragraph (c) of this clause.

(e) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (e), in all subcontracts for commodities that exceed $500.

(End of clause)

[70 FR 57192, Sept. 30, 2005]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 311 

Honoring the Portland Thorns FC as the champion of the National Women’s 

Soccer League in 2017. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2017 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the Portland Thorns FC as the champion of the 

National Women’s Soccer League in 2017. 

Whereas the Portland Thorns FC won the National Women’s 

Soccer League (referred to in this preamble as the 

‘‘NWSL’’) Championship on October 14, 2017; 

Whereas the Portland Thorns FC won the NWSL Championship, an event that has been held for 5 years, for the second time by defeating the North Carolina Courage by a 

score of 1 to 0; 

Whereas Portland Thorns FC midfielder Lindsey Horan 

scored the only goal in the 2017 NWSL Championship 

and was named the Most Valuable Player of that Championship; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 311 IS 

Whereas the head coach, Mark Parsons, and owner, Merritt 

Paulson, of the Portland Thorns FC won the NWSL 

Championship for the second time; 

Whereas the Rose City Riveters and the fans of the Portland 

Thorns FC, who provide the Providence Park venue with 

spirit and pride, are the best fans in the NWSL; 

Whereas the Portland Thorns FC holds the record for highest average game attendance in the NWSL in 2017 and 

has held that record in each year since the establishment 

of the NWSL in 2013; 

Whereas the goalkeeper of the Portland Thorns FC, 

Adrianna Franch, was named the NWSL Goalkeeper of 

the Year for 2017; 

Whereas the Portland Thorns FC adopted the official State 

motto of Oregon, ‘‘Alis Volat Propriis’’, meaning ‘‘She 

Flies with Her Own Wings’’, to capture the independent 

spirit of Oregon; 

Whereas the Portland Thorns FC holds community service 

events to inspire and involve young women and men in 

the Portland community through science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and environmental education; 

and 

Whereas the success of the Portland Thorns FC soccer team 

will broaden an appreciation of athletics in young people 

and encourage Oregonians to engage in their communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the Portland Thorns FC as the 2017 

3 champion of the National Women’s Soccer League; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 311 IS 

1 (2) recognizes the outstanding achievement of 

2 the players, ownership, and staff of the Portland 

3 Thorns FC; and 

4 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

5 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu6 tion to the Portland Thorns FC. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of International Lease Finance Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting
Date:April 5, 2005                                            /s/ Alan H. Lund   ALAN H. LUND   Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
NOT PRECEDENTIAL 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 16-4145

_____________

FREDERICK M. WEINBERG; JANICE T. NINI,

Appellants

v.

SCOTT E. KAPLAN, LLC

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(District Court No.: 3-16-cv-04913)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It has come to the Clerk’s attention that the caption was incorrect on the Court’s 

Opinion and Judgment entered August 21, 2017, and did not include the second 

Appellant Janice T. Nini. It is noted that the opinion addressed the claims on behalf of 

both husband and wife. Accordingly, It is hereby O R D E R E D that the caption on the 

opinion filed on August 21, 2017 is amended as follows:

FREDERICK M. WEINBERG; JANICE T. NINI,

Appellants

v.

SCOTT E. KAPLAN, LLC

In addition, an Amended Judgment and Amended Mandate will be issued.
For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: September 14, 2017

CJG/cc: Peter A. Ouda, Esq.

William G. Wright, Esq.
#### 2816.207-3 Limitations.

The BPC or designee is the chief of the contracting office for the purposes of FAR 16.207-3(d).
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-14 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:826
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-14 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:827 Case 2:12-cv-01057-GMN-RJJ Document 83-42 Filed 08/07/12 Page 2 of 2
Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 23-14 Filed: 12/03/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:828 Case 2:12-cv-01057-GMN-RJJ Document 83-43 Filed 08/07/12 Page 2 of 2
4 

EXHIBIT A 

Case: 1:12-cv-05300 Document #: 61-1 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:255
5 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

 ) 

IN RE: GROUPON DERIVATIVE ) Master Docket No. 12-CV-5300 

LITIGATION ) 

) Hon. Andrea R. Wood 

) 

) Hon. Mary M. Rowland 

__________________________________________) 

AGREED ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

This Cause coming to be heard on the Agreed Motion of the Parties for entry of an 

Agreed Order providing for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of the above-captioned action, 

due notice having been given and the Court being advised in the premises: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

The above cause hereby is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: ________________________ Entered: ________________________ 

HON. ANDREA R. WOOD 

Case: 1:12-cv-05300 Document #: 61-1 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:256
25.903 Exempted supplies. ( a ) Subchapters VIII and X of Chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202) list supplies for which exemptions from duty may be obtained when imported into the customs territory of the United States under a Government contract. For certain of these supplies, the contracting agency must certify to the Commissioner of Customs that they are for the purpose stated in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (see 19 CFR 10.102-104, 10.114, and 10.121 and 15 CFR part 301 for requirements and formats).
( b ) Supplies (excluding equipment) for Government-operated vessels or aircraft may be withdrawn from any customs-bonded warehouse, from continuous customs custody elsewhere than in a bonded warehouse, or from a foreign-trade zone, free of duty and internal revenue tax as provided in 19 U.S.C. 1309 and 1317. The contracting activity must cite this authority on the appropriate customs form when making purchases (see 19 CFR 10.59-10.65).
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8206-8207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 8207]]

amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; NIH Blueprint for 
Neuroscience Research: Functional Neural Circuits of Interoception.
    Date: March 18th-19th, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, 
DEMII, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jessica Marie McKlveen, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NCCIH, NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-547, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#355f5046465c56541b58565e594350505b755b5c5d1b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c06091f1f050f0d42010f07001a0909022c020504420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 27, 2021.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-02297 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>