alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 2-97190 and 33-86016) pertaining to the MPSI Systems Inc. 1984
Stock Option Plan and the MPSI Systems Inc. 1988 Stock Option Plan and in the
related Prospectuses of our reports dated November 20, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of MPSI Systems Inc. included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 1998.


                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 18, 1998
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-3353-17T2

PREFERRED HOME HEALTHCARE 

AND NURSE SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MAGNACARE ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant-Respondent.

____________________________________

Submitted February 14, 2019 – Decided

Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, 

Chancery Division, Middlesex County, Docket No.

C-000160-16.

Callagy Law, PC, attorneys for appellant (Trevor G. 

Anderson and Christopher R. Miller, on the brief).

Becker, LLC, attorneys for respondent (Joseph George 

Harraka, Jr. and Joseph F. Falgiani, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

July 5, 2019
2

A-3353-17T2

In this contract action, plaintiff Preferred Home Healthcare and Nurse 

Services, Inc., appeals from a February 16, 2018 order granting defendant 

Magnacare Administrative Services, LLC summary judgment dismissal. We 

affirm.

In 2015, the parties entered into a participating provider agreement, which 

expressly states plaintiff is to be reimbursed a maximum of two hours per day 

for home nursing services. Plaintiff contends that, when it entered into the 

agreement, it did not understand that the two hour per day limitation specified 

in the agreement applied to patients requiring more than two hours of care per 

day.

On appeal, plaintiff's principal contentions are the subject agreement must 

be rescinded because it is an unconscionable contract of adhesion, devoid of 

consideration, and the product of a material mistake. We have examined the 

record and applicable legal principles, and find insufficient merit in plaintiff's 

contentions to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         499,673
<SECURITIES>                                   507,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                  550,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,570,997
<PP&E>                                          26,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,597,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,747
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,516,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,597,312
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,202
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               582,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (546,623)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    48,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (498,623)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
#### William L. Lehman, Respondent-Appellant, v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the ground that the verdict of $65,000 is grossly excessive on this record, with costs to abide the event. Bergan, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### Keahon Brothers, Inc., Respondent, v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission et al., Defendants, Amadeus, Inc., et al., Appellants, and Frank Frontino et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Clarkstown Equipment Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission et al., Defendants, Amadeus, Inc., et al., Appellants, and Frank Frontino et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

In two consolidated actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens arising out of a public improvement project, and to recover payment under a certain labor and material payment bond, the defendants Amadeus, Inc., and American Surety Company of New York appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated March 24, 1964, which denied their motion: (a) to open the default of the Surety Company in failing to answer the complaint in Action No. 1, to permit it to serve its proposed answer, and to permit both of said defendants to serve answers and amended answers to the complaints and cross claims of the lienor plaintiffs and lienor defendants in both actions; and (b) for further and related relief. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements *(Investment Corp. of Philadelphia*v. *Spector,*12 A D 2d 911; *Wischerth*v. *Wischerth,*266 App. Div. 881; *Morris*v. *Coral Cafe,*281 App. Div. 844; *Ackerman*v. *Philip Fleischer, Inc.,*21 Misc 2d 590). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
## Related HBCU Sites

- Title III Part B, Strengthening Historically Black Colleges and Universities Program
-  Title III Part D , HBCU Capital Financing Program
- White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Advisory Board

## OPE Programs

- Title III Part A , Strengthening Institutions Program
-  Title V , Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program
- Title III Part E, Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program  Predominately Black Institutions (Formula Grants)  Predominately Black Institutions Program (Competitive Grants)  Master’s Degree Programs at Predominately Black Institutions  Master’s Degree Programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities  Federal TRIO Programs  GEAR UP  Child Care Access Means Parents In School Program  International and Foreign Language Education   Organizations    - National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education  (NAFEO); contact: (301) 650-2440  
  - Historically Black College and University Capital Finance Program Designated Bonding Authority  
  - Thurgood Marshall College Fund  Other Resources    - OPE - Applicant and Grantee Resources  Top  Institutional Service Home           Last Modified: 05/05/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 332 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 332

 Commemorating the christening of the USNS Hershel ``Woody'' Williams.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2017

   Mr. Manchin (for himself and Mrs. Capito) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating the christening of the USNS Hershel ``Woody'' Williams.

Whereas Chief Warrant Officer 4 Hershel Woodrow ``Woody'' Williams of Fairmont, 
        West Virginia, served in the Marine Corps for 17 years;
Whereas Hershel Woodrow ``Woody'' Williams served valiantly as a demolition 
        sergeant with the 21st Marines, 3d Marine Division, against enemy 
        Japanese forces at the Battle of Iwo Jima;
Whereas on October 5, 1945, Hershel Woodrow ``Woody'' Williams received the 
        Medal of Honor from President Harry S. Truman for ``valiant devotion to 
        duty'' at Iwo Jima on February 23, 1945;
Whereas Hershel Woodrow ``Woody'' Williams is the sole surviving Marine veteran 
        of World War II to wear the Medal of Honor;
Whereas on January 14, 2016, during a ceremony in Charleston, West Virginia, 
        Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus announced that the Expeditionary Sea 
        Base Ship T-ESB 4--the second of its kind--would be named United States 
        Naval Ship (referred to in this preamble as ``USNS'') Hershel ``Woody'' 
        Williams;
Whereas on August 19, 2017, the United States Navy launched the USNS Hershel 
        ``Woody'' Williams; and
Whereas on October 21, 2017, the USNS Hershel ``Woody'' Williams was christened 
        in San Diego, California: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commemorates the christening of the 
United States Naval Ship Hershel ``Woody'' Williams and its mission to 
support mine countermeasures, counter-piracy operations, maritime 
security, and humanitarian and crisis response operations.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income and statement of cash flows contained in
Form 10-Q of Cambridge Electric Light Company for the six months ended June
30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           99,979
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          9,961
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              19,757
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            40,548
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     170,245
<COMMON>                             8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  9,246
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      45,864
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                17,402
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  30,465
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      76,414
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      170,245
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           63,113
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                   136
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          61,709
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          61,845
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              1,268
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                   1,025
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       2,293
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             1,691
<NET-INCOME>                           602
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>          602
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>               589
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>              837
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                 135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 1 

Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate and honor the members 

of the Armed Forces who served on active duty in support of Operation 

Desert Storm or Operation Desert Shield. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. DONNELLY) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate and 

honor the members of the Armed Forces who served 

on active duty in support of Operation Desert Storm 

or Operation Desert Shield. 

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, 

provides that the location of a commemorative work in 

Area I, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Commemorative 

Areas Washington, DC and Environs’’, numbered 869/ 

86501 B, and dated June 24, 2003, shall be deemed to 

be authorized only if a recommendation for the location 

is approved by law not later than 150 calendar days after 

the date on which Congress is notified of the recommendation; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 1 IS 

Whereas section 3093 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. 

‘‘Buck’’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2015 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note; Public Law 

113–291) authorized the National Desert Storm Memorial Association to establish a memorial on Federal land 

in the District of Columbia, to honor the members of the 

Armed Forces who served on active duty in support of 

Operation Desert Storm or Operation Desert Shield; and 

Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress 

of the determination of the Secretary of the Interior that 

the memorial should be located in Area I: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the location of a commemorative work to commemo4 rate and honor the members of the Armed Forces who 

5 served on active duty in support of Operation Desert 

6 Storm or Operation Desert Shield authorized by section 

7 3093 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon 

8 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 

9 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note; Public Law 113–291), within Area 

10 I, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Commemorative Areas 

11 Washington, DC and Environs’’, numbered 869/86501 B, 

12 and dated June 24, 2003, is approved. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Amendment to Letter Agreement (Dr. Mark E. Griffin)


 Exhibit 10.12 
 October 21, 2009 
 Mr. Mark Griffin 
 2105 City West Blvd. 
 Suite 500 
 Houston, Texas 77042 
  

	 	RE:	Amendment of Offer Letter dated June 9, 2009 

 Dear Mark: 
 Reference is made to the offer letter of Omega Protein Corporation (the “Company”) addressed to you and
dated June 9, 2009 (the “Offer Letter”). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Offer Letter. This letter agreement (this “Letter Agreement”) serves as an
amendment to the Offer Letter, effective as of the date first written above. 
 Pursuant to paragraph 4 of the Offer Letter, the Company agreed
to extend you certain benefits under its relocation policy, including, but not limited to, temporary housing, furniture storage and reimbursement of a loss on the sale of your residence in Missouri, subject to the terms and conditions in the Offer
Letter. 
 The Company agrees to modify, and the Employee agrees to accept, the following benefits in its Offer Letter as described below:

  

	 	•	 	 Temporary housing will be extended from 3 months to a total of 6 months, if needed. The Employee may utilize a reasonable number of coach class airfare
trips (in accordance with Company policy) to travel to his primary residence during this period, if necessary; 


  

	 	•	 	 Furniture storage will be extended from 3 months to a total of 6 months, if needed; and 


  

	 	•	 	 The Company will reimburse you for 100% of the loss incurred by you (as defined herein), up to a maximum amount of $100,000, on the sale of your
primary residence in Missouri to a non-affiliated purchaser. Such loss will be calculated as the difference between: (i) your original purchase price for such primary residence (including contemporaneous post-purchase date completion work),
minus (ii) the proceeds realized by you from the sale of that residence, net of ordinary and reasonable fees and expenses incurred in connection with such sale (other than fees and expenses reimbursed to you by the Company). This reimbursement
by the










 Mr. Mark Griffin 
 October 21, 2009 
 Page 2 
  


	 	 
Company shall be conditioned on (i) your being employed by the Company at the time of sale, (ii) the completion of such sale prior to December 31, 2010, and (iii) your
submission to the Company of reasonable documentation supporting the calculation of the loss amount. 


 Except as expressly
set forth in this Letter Agreement, all provisions, terms and conditions in the Offer Letter remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 
 If you agree with the terms and conditions of this Letter Agreement, please sign this Letter Agreement in the space provided below and return it to me. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	John D. Held

 Agreed as of the date 
     first written above: 
  

	
	 /s/ Mark Griffin

	Mark Griffin
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 62241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21558]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Airport Property; Southwest Florida 
International Airport, Fort Myers, FL.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release 
approximately 0.521 acres of airport property at the Southwest Florida 
International Airport, Fort Myers, FL, from the terms, conditions, 
reservations, and restrictions as contained in federal grant 
assurances. The release of property will allow Lee County Port 
Authority to dispose of the property for other than aeronautical 
purposes. The property is located on Treeline Avenue along its proposed 
intersection with the extension of Jetport Loop, Fort Myers, Florida. 
The parcel is currently designated as aeronautical land use. The 
property will be released of its federal obligations for roadway 
access/right-of-way purposes. The fair market value of these parcels 
has been determined to be $170,000.

DATES: Comments are due on or before October 11, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at Lee County Port 
Authority, 11000 Terminal Access Road, Suite 8671, Fort Myers, Florida 
33913; and the FAA Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National 
Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written comments on the Sponsor's 
request must be delivered or mailed to: Marisol C. Elliott, Community 
Planner, Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National 
Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024. Documents reflecting the 
Sponsor's request are available for inspection by appointment only at 
the Lee County Port Authority and by contacting the FAA at the address 
listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisol C. Elliott, Community Planner, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

    Issued in Orlando, Florida, on August 31, 2016.
Bart Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-21558 Filed 9-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### 227.7107 Contracts for architect-engineer services.

This section sets forth policies and procedures, pertaining to data, copyrights, and restricted designs unique to the acquisition of construction and architect-engineer services.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 32496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13351]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2012 / 
Notices

[[Page 32496]]

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby 
given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid 
(ACVFA).
    Date: Friday, June 15, 2012.
    Registration: 8 a.m. to 9 a.m.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Location: Georgetown University, Healy Hall Lawn (site of ACVFA 
meeting tent), 37th and O Streets NW., Washington, DC 20057.

Agenda

    USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah will make opening remarks, followed 
by panel discussions among ACVFA members and USAID leadership, and open 
Q&A. A draft agenda and additional information will be forthcoming on 
the ACVFA Web site at http://www.usaid.gov/about_usaid/acvfa.

Stakeholders

    The meeting is free and open to the public. Persons wishing to 
attend should register online at http://transition.usaid.gov/about_usaid/acvfa/acvfaregistration.html. For additional information please 
contact Paloma Adams-Allen at (202) 712-4378 or PAdamsA@usaid.gov.

    Dated: May 29, 2012.
Paloma Adams-Allen,
ACVFA Executive Director (A).
[FR Doc. 2012-13351 Filed 5-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```