alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016454EN.01000204.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/2

---

Decisions adopted by the Court in its Special General Meeting on 4 October 2016

(2016/C 454/05)

Assignment of Judges to Chambers of three Judges

At its meeting on 4 October 2016, the Court decided to assign Judges to the Chambers of three Judges as follows:

Sixth Chamber

Mr Regan, President of the Chamber,

Mr Bonichot, Mr Arabadjiev, Mr Fernlund and Mr Rodin, Judges.

Seventh Chamber

Ms Prechal, President of the Chamber,

Mr Rosas, Ms Toader and Mr Jarašiūnas, Judges.

Eighth Chamber

Mr Vilaras, President of the Chamber,

Mr Malenovský, Mr Safjan, and Mr Šváby, Judges.

Ninth Chamber

Mr Juhász, President of the Chamber,

Mr Vajda, Ms Jürimäe and Mr Lycourgos, Judges.

Tenth Chamber

Ms Berger, President of the Chamber,

Mr Borg Barthet, Mr Levits and Mr Biltgen, Judges.

---
2803.104-7 Violations or possible violations. ( a ) Upon receipt of information regarding a violation or possible violation of 41 U.S.C. 2102, 2103, or 2104, the contracting officer must make the determination required by FAR 3.104-7(a) and follow the procedures prescribed therein. ( 1 ) Make the determination required by FAR 3.104-7(a) and follow the procedures prescribed therein.
( 2 ) [Reserved].
( b ) The individual referenced in FAR 3.104-7(a)(1) is the BPC.
( c ) The HCA or designee must follow the criteria contained in FAR 3.104-7(g) when delegating authority under this subpart.
( d ) The HCA or designee shall refer information regarding actual or possible violations of section 41 U.S.C. 2102, 2103, or 2014 to the OIG or other office designated in Attorney General Order 1931-94.
( e ) If the HCA or designee, after receiving information relating to a violation, or possible violation, determines that award or extension of a contract potentially affected by the violation is justified by urgent and compelling circumstances, or is otherwise in the interest of the Government, then the HCA may authorize the contracting officer to award or extend the contract after notification to the OIG or other office designated in Attorney General Order 1931-94.
( f ) The HCA will advise the contracting officer as to the action to be taken. Criminal and civil penalties, and administrative remedies, may apply to conduct that violates 41 U.S.C. chapter 21, see FAR 3.104-8.
( g ) The contracting officer shall advise the SPE in writing of all allegations of violations. The contracting officer must describe the alleged violation as well as actions taken.
222.406-9 Withholding from or suspension of contract payments. ( a ) *Withholding from contract payments.* The contracting officer shall contact the labor advisor for assistance when payments due a contractor are not available to satisfy that contractor's liability for Construction Wage Rate Requirements or CWHSS statute wage underpayments or liquidated damages.
( c ) *Disposition of contract payments withheld or suspended* —(3) *Limitation on forwarding or returning funds.* When disposition of withheld funds remains the final action necessary to close out a contract, the Department of Labor will retain withheld funds pending completion of an investigation or other administrative proceedings. (4) *Liquidated damages.* (A) The agency head may adjust liquidated damages of $500 or less when the amount assessed is incorrect or waive the assessment when the violations— ( 1 ) Were nonwillful or inadvertent; and
( 2 ) Occurred notwithstanding the exercise of due care by the contractor, its subcontractor, or their agents. ( B ) The agency head may recommend to the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, that the liquidated damages over $500 be adjusted because the amount assessed is incorrect. The agency head may also recommend the assessment be waived when the violations—
(*1*) Were nonwillful or inadvertent; and (*2*) Occurred notwithstanding the exercise of due care by the contractor, the subcontractor, or their agents. [56 FR 36358, July 31, 1991, as amended at 77 FR 35880, June 15, 2012; 82 FR 61480, Dec. 28, 2017]
#### FREEMAN, Respondent, v. FREEMAN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by Frank E. Freeman against J. Irving Freeman and another.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

STOVER, J., not voting.
Exemption Request - 121.333
Leo D Hollis AFS-220, Air Carrier Operations t o : Chuck.Schramek 09/30/2011 10:05 AM

Cc: Richard Clarke, D K Deaderick, Jeanine Persons, Ida Klepper, Keira Jones, Nancy L Claussen
Mr. Schramek: We requested the FAA’s Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) to review and evaluate your request for an exemption to certain requirements in 14 CFR part 121 § 121.333. We have received the results of that evaluation. CAMI stated that the requirements in § 121.333 recognize a difference between non-emergency flight between 10,000 and 14,000 feet as addressed in § 121.329 and flight at these altitudes following a decompression and subsequent rapid descent. In the latter situation, pulmonary sequelae of barotraumas such as arterial gas embolisms and alveolar rupture may be present in some passengers. The standard of care for such emergencies still includes the provision of continuous supplemental oxygen. We recognize that decompression is an extremely rare event and that a decompression over a mountainous area requiring that the flight stay above 10,000 ft is even more remote. Nonetheless, an increasingly older flying population will predictably have more medical conditions that are affected by hypoxia at 14,000 feet. In order to complete our technical analysis of your petition for exemption, the FAA is requesting the submission of additional data to the docket. Please provide analysis of the potential passenger population and the passenger health issues on the affected routes including consideration for additional portable emergency oxygen systems, medical supplies, flight attendant training and operational plans. Additionally, a plan should be proposed that addresses how additional medical support will be provided to passengers with barotraumatic injuries or compromised cardiopulmonary function in the event of a decompression.

Leo Hollis Aviation Safety Inspector Aircraft Dispatcher Air Transportation Division - AFS-220 (202) 493-5508
#### OETHOUT, Respondent, v. KERR, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

Action by Samuel N. Oethout against Emily W. Kerr and another. From an order denying defendant Kerr’s motion to vacate an order for substituted service, she appeals. Affirmed.

Charles W. Dayton, for appellant.

Joseph M. Williams, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant made a motion to vacate an order for substituted service, which was denied. Defendant appeals. The affidavits sufficiently show that defendant was a resident of the state and was avoiding service. We find no abuse of discretion on the part *1138of the justice. See Code, § 435; Collins v. Ryan, 32 Barb. 647; Haswell v. Lincks, 87 N. Y. 637. Order is affirmed, with costs.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NICHOLAS MARTIN 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS; VANTAGE SOURCING, LLC; 

MIRACLE FINANCIAL, INC.; and CREDIT 

BUREAU OF NAPA COUNTY, INC. d/b/a 

CHASE RECEIVABLES 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 12-cv-5147 

Judge Ronald A. Guzman 

Magistrate Sheila M. Finnegan 

 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

 Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), plaintiff NICHOLAS MARTIN gives notice that 

defendant MIRACLE FINANCIAL, INC. is hereby dismissed from the above captioned lawsuit, 

without prejudice. 

 Defendant MIRACLE FINANCIAL, INC. has not filed either an answer to the complaint 

or a motion for summary judgment as of this time. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 s/ Nicholas Martin

 Nicholas Martin 

Pro Se 

 PO Box 4030 

 Chicago, IL 60654-4030 

 (312) 725-9103 

Case: 1:12-cv-05147 Document #: 13 Filed: 07/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:46
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, Nicholas Martin, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(a), state that on July 20, 2012, I 

electronically filed the foregoing NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will serve electronic notice to all counsel of record. 

A true and correct copy of same was sent via U.S. first-class mail, postage pre-paid, upon 

the following parties which have not yet filed an appearance in this matter: 

Vantage Sourcing, LLC 

C/O National Registered Agents Inc., Registered Agent 

200 W. Adams St. 

Chicago, Il 60606 

Miracle Financial, Inc. 

C/O Business Filings Incorporated, Registered Agent 

600 S. Second St., Ste 103 

Springfield, Il 62704 

Credit Bureau of Napa County, Inc. 

C/O CT Corporation System, Registered Agent 

208 S. Lasalle St., Ste 814 

Chicago, Il 60604 

 

 s/ Nicholas Martin

 

Case: 1:12-cv-05147 Document #: 13 Filed: 07/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:47
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 4.1.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                          DATAWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                            Pursuant to Section 242
                       of the General Corporation Law of
                             the State of Delaware

     Dataware Technologies, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
does hereby certify that (a) at a meeting of Directors duly held on February 8,
2000, the Board of Directors duly adopted resolutions pursuant to Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, setting forth an amendment
to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and declaring
said amendment to be advisable, and (b) the stockholders of the Corporation duly
approved said amendment at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 13,
2000 in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     The resolution setting forth the amendment is as follows:

     RESOLVED:   Article FOURTH, subsection (a) of the Corporation's Restated
Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read as follows:

     "FOURTH:  The Corporation shall be authorized to issue Thirty-Eight Million
(38,000,000) shares of capital stock, which shall be divided into Thirty Million
(30,000,000) shares of Common Stock with a par value of one cent ($.01) per
share and Eight Million (8,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock with a par value
of one cent ($.01) per share."


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer this 13th day of April,
2000.


                                          DATAWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                          By: /s/ David Mahoney
                                              ------------------
                                              David Mahoney
2901.404 Class deviations. ( a ) Class deviations affect more than one contract action. If DOL believes that it will require a class deviation on a permanent basis, it will propose a FAR revision per FAR 1.404.
( b ) The SPE is authorized to approve and process class deviations from the FAR or the DOLAR, unless FAR 1.405(e) is applicable.
227.7105-1 General. ( a ) Existing works include motion pictures, television recordings, video recordings, and other audiovisual works in any medium; sound recordings in any medium; musical, dramatic, and literary works; pantomimes and choreographic works; pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; and works of a similar nature. Usually, these or similar works were not first created, developed, generated, originated, prepared, or produced under a Government contract. Therefore, the Government must obtain a license in the work if it intends to reproduce the work, distribute copies of the work, prepare derivative works, or perform or display the work publicly. When the Government is not responsible for the content of an existing work, it should require the copyright owner to indemnify the Government for liabilities that may arise out of the content, performance, use, or disclosure of such data.
( b ) Follow the procedures at 227.7106 for works which will be first created, developed, generated, originated, prepared, or produced under a Government contract and the Government needs to control distribution of the work or has a specific need to obtain indemnity for liabilities that may arise out of the creation, content, performance, use, or disclosure of the work or from libelous or other unlawful material contained in the work. Follow the procedures at 227.7103 when the Government does not need to control distribution of such works or obtain such indemnities.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 301 

Designating the week beginning on October 22, 2017, as ‘‘National Chemistry 

Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 24, 2017 

Mr. COONS (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning on October 22, 2017, as 

‘‘National Chemistry Week’’. 

Whereas chemistry is the science of basic units of matter 

and, consequently, plays a role in every aspect of human 

life; 

Whereas chemistry has broad applications, including food 

science, soil science, water quality, energy, sustainability, 

medicine, and electronics; 

Whereas the science of chemistry is vital to improving the 

quality of human life and plays an important role in addressing critical global challenges; 

Whereas innovations in chemistry continue to spur economic 

growth and job creation and have applications for a wide 

range of industries; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 301 ATS 

Whereas National Chemistry Week is part of a broader vision 

to improve human life through chemistry and to advance 

the chemistry enterprise and the practitioners of that enterprise for the benefit of communities and the environment; 

Whereas the purpose of National Chemistry Week is to reach 

the public with educational messages about chemistry in 

order to foster greater understanding of and appreciation 

for the applications and benefits of chemistry; 

Whereas National Chemistry Week strives to stimulate the 

interest of young people, including women and underrepresented groups, in enthusiastically studying science, 

technology, engineering, and mathematics and in pursuing science-related careers that lead to innovations and 

major scientific breakthroughs; 

Whereas National Chemistry Week highlights many of the everyday uses of chemistry, including in food, dyes and pigments, plastics, soaps and detergents, health products, 

and energy technologies; 

Whereas the theme of the 30th annual National Chemistry 

Week is ‘‘Chemistry Rocks!’’; and 

Whereas students who participate in National Chemistry 

Week deserve recognition and support for their efforts: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning on October 

3 22, 2017, as ‘‘National Chemistry Week’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals of and welcomes the par5 ticipants in the 30th annual National Chemistry 

6 Week; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 301 ATS 

1 (3) recognizes the need to promote the fields of 

2 science, including chemistry, technology, engineering, 

3 and mathematics and to encourage youth to pursue 

4 careers in these fields; and 

5 (4) commends the American Chemical Society 

6 and the partners of that society for organizing and 

7 convening events and activities surrounding National 

8 Chemistry Week each year. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS - EASTERN DIVISION

ATG TRUST COMPANY, N.A. )

as Independent Administrator of the Estate of )

KARAKA WALLS Deceased, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Court No. 12 CV 05275

)

CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal )

Corporation, and ALEJANDRO CABRAL, )

ROBERT HERNANDEZ, and JUAN )

BELMONTES, Officers of the Chicago Police )

Department, )

) Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr

)

)

Defendants. )

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, ATG TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Independent 

Administrator of the Estate of KARAKA WALLS, deceased, by and through its attorneys, 

ROMANUCCI & BLANDIN, LLC, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), 

entering a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the above-captioned cause of 

action. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this stipulation is signed by all parties who have

appeared in this cause of action.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: March 22, 2014 By: /s Angela P. Kurtz

Angela P. Kurtz

ROMANUCCI & BLANDIN, LLC

321 N. Clark St., Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60654
2

Attorneys for All Defendants

Dated: March 27, 2013 By: s/ Arlene E. Martin

Arlene E. Martin

City of Chicago Dept. of Law

30 N. LaSalle St., Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60602

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Angela P. Kurtz, an attorney, certify that I caused copies of the foregoing Stipulation 

for Voluntary Dismissal to be served via the Court’s CM/ECF system this 27th day of March, 

2014.

s/ Angela P. Kurtz
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>

McDonnell Douglas Finance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges

<CAPTION>


                                                                                  Years Ending December 31,
                                                                  ----------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in millions)                                                 1996        1995      1994        1993       1992
Income:
   Income from continuing operations before income
<S>                                                               <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
     taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change             $    74.9   $    60.3   $   41.1   $    39.2   $   44.8
   Fixed charges                                                      120.8       105.4      111.8       120.0      149.4
                                                                ===========================================================
   Income from continuing operations before income taxes,
     cumulative effect of accounting change and fixed charges     $   195.7   $   165.7   $  152.9   $   159.2   $  194.2
                                                                ===========================================================

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                               $   117.3   $   101.9   $  108.3   $   116.4   $  145.9
   Preferred stock cash dividends                                       3.5         3.5        3.5         3.6        3.5
                                                                ===========================================================
                                                                  $   120.8   $   105.4   $  111.8   $   120.0   $  149.4
                                                                ===========================================================


   Ratio of income from continuing operations before taxes on
     income, cumulative effect of accounting change and fixed
     fixed charges to fixed charges                                     1.62        1.57       1.37        1.33       1.30
                                                                ===========================================================


</TABLE>
In-Person Attendees: Test Procedures NOPR for Showerheads, Faucets, Water Closets, Urinals, and Commercial Pre-Rinse Spray Val

Meeting Date: Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Armstrong, Ashley General Engineer U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-586-6590 202-586-4

Barhydt, Laura Deputy General Counsel 

for Litigation

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-5772 N/A 

Cocciardi, Josh Mechanical Engineer U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-1656 202-586-4

Edwards, Brenda J. Program Support 

Specialist

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-596-2945 202-586-4

Heine, Kristine Executive Vice 

President

Global Communicators, LLC International Square, 1875 I 

Street, NW, Suite 500

Washington DC 20006 202-371-9800 703-620-0

Hobbs, Karen Senior Policy Advocate Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC)

2 N. Riverside Plaza, Suite 2250

Chicago IL 60606 312-651-7915 312-234-9

Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy 

Coordinator

Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NW, Suite 600

Washington DC 200445 202-507-4034 N/A 

Osann, Edward R. N/A Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC)

1314 Second Street Santa 

Monica

CA 90401 310-434-2300 310-434-2

Salmon, Stephanie M. Vice President Artemis Strategies 10 G Street, NE, Suite 601 Washington DC 20002 202-783-1080 202-783-1Stoughton, Kate McMordie

Engineer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

(PNNL)

902 Battelle Boulevard, PO Box 999, MSIN K5-20

Richland WA 99352 720-379-3511 N/A 

Tiedeman, Jennifer General Counsel U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-6111 N/A 

Williamson, Jennifer L Engineer

Technology Planning & Deployment

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle Boulevard, P.O. Box 999MSIN K6-05

Richland WA 99352 509-372-4168 509-372-4
#### In the Matter of Lawrence Handel, Petitioner, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.

The sanction of dismissal to which petitioner was subjected is unanimously annulled, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and in lieu thereof suspension for 60 days is imposed upon him, without costs. The record shows that, although petitioner had been in public service for many years and had served creditably, *655he performed his duties in question incompetently and negligently. No willfulness or corruption is shown, and upon the argument respondent’s counsel acknowledged that there was none in the case. The determination of respondent is otherwise confirmed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.