alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lemarcus Adrice HINTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-12250

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2007.

Zane Patrick Leiden, Augusta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Amy Lee Copeland, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Lamarcus Hinton appeals the revocation of his supervised release and sentence of 24 months of imprisonment. Hinton argues that the district court deprived him of due process when it failed to conduct a revocation hearing within a reasonable time. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(b); *Morrissey v. Brewer,*408 U.S. 471, 488, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2603-04, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). Hinton contends that the delay of almost two years between when he self-reported a violation of his supervised release and his revocation hearing was unreasonable. We affirm.

Because Hinton raises this argument for the first time on appeal, we review for plain error. *See United States v. Aguillard,*217 F.3d 1319, 1320 (11th Cir.2000).

Due process requires that a revocation hearing “be tendered within a reasonable time after the parolee is taken into custody” for violating the conditions of parole. *Morrissey,*408 U.S. at 488, 92 S.Ct. at 2603-04. “The same protections granted those facing revocation of parole are required for those facing the revocation of supervised release.” *United States v. Copeland,*20 F.3d 412, 414 (11th Cir.1994). The Supreme Court has also stated that because “the loss of liberty as a parole violator does not occur until the parolee is taken into custody,” there is “no constitu*840tional duty to provide [the parolee] an adversary parole hearing until he is taken into custody as a parole violator.” *Moody v. Daggett,*429 U.S. 78, 87-89, 97 S.Ct. 274, 279-80, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976). Rule 32.1 also requires that a court “hold the revocation hearing within a reasonable time in the district court having jurisdiction.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(b)(2).

The district court did not plainly err. The district court conducted Hinton’s revocation hearing over two years after Hinton’s violation of his supervised release, but Hinton remained free of federal custody during the two-year period. Although we have not addressed the trigger from which a “reasonable time” is measured under Rule 32.1, the former Fifth Circuit held that the execution of a warrant for a parole violation and the taking into federal custody of the parole violator “is the operative factor in triggering the availability of the revocation hearing” required by *Morrissey. See Cook v. United States Att’y Gen.,*488 F.2d 667, 671 (5th Cir.1974). Other circuits also have concluded that the revocation hearing required by Rule 32.1(b) must be held within a reasonable time after the offender is taken into federal custody for violating the conditions of his probation or supervised release. *See United States v. Chaklader,*987 F.2d 75, 77 (1st Cir.1993); *see also United States v. Pardue,*363 F.3d 695, 698 (8th Cir.2004).

Hinton’s sentence is

AFFIRMED.
#### 252.215-7014 Exception from Certified Cost or Pricing Data Requirements for Foreign Military Sales Indirect Offsets.

As prescribed in 215.408(8), use the following clause:

# Exception From Certified Cost or Pricing Data Requirements for Foreign Military Sales Indirect Offsets (DEC 2022)

(a) *Definition.* As used in this clause—

*Offset* means a benefit or obligation agreed to by a contractor and a foreign government or international organization as an inducement or condition to purchase supplies or services pursuant to a foreign military sale (FMS). There are two types of offsets: Direct offsets and indirect offsets.

(i) A direct offset involves benefits or obligations, including supplies or services that are directly related to the item being purchased and are integral to the deliverable of the FMS contract. For example, as a condition of a foreign military sale, the contractor may require or agree to permit the customer to produce in its country certain components or subsystems of the item being sold. Generally, direct offsets must be performed within a specified period, because they are integral to the deliverable of the FMS contract.

(ii) An indirect offset involves benefits or obligations, including supplies or services that are not directly related to the specific item(s) being purchased and are not integral to the deliverable of the FMS contract. For example, as a condition of a foreign military sale, the contractor may agree to purchase certain manufactured products, agricultural commodities, raw materials, or services, or make an equity investment or grant of equipment required by the FMS customer, or may agree to build a school, road or other facility. Indirect offsets would also include projects that are related to the FMS contract but not purchased under said contract (*e.g.,* a project to develop or advance a capability, technology transfer, or know-how in a foreign company). Indirect offsets may be accomplished without a clearly defined period of performance.

(b) *Exceptions from certified cost or pricing data requirements.* Notwithstanding the requirements of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.215-20, Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data, in the case of this contract or a subcontract, and FAR 52.215-21, Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data—Modifications, in the case of modification of this contract or a subcontract, submission of certified cost or pricing data shall not be required to the extent such data relates to an indirect offset (10 U.S.C. 3703(a)(4)).

(End of clause)

[83 FR 30829, June 29, 2018; as amended at 87 FR 76997, Dec. 16, 2022]
26.202-1 Local area set-aside. The contracting officer may set aside solicitations to allow only local firms within a specific geographic area to compete (*see* 6.208). ( a ) The contracting officer, in consultation with the requirements office, shall define the specific geographic area for the local set-aside.
( b ) A major disaster or emergency area may span counties in several contiguous States. The set-aside area need not include all the counties in the declared disaster/emergency area(s), but cannot go outside it.
( c ) The contracting officer shall also determine whether a local area set-aside should be further restricted to small business concerns in the set-aside area (see Part 19).
[72 FR 63087, Nov. 7, 2007, as amended at 76 FR 18312, Apr. 1, 2011]
# C_2017386EN.01000201.xml

| 16.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/2

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 386/02)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Monaco

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Carabiniers du Prince (‘Carabiniers’ of the Prince)

Subject of commemoration

Carabiniers du Prince

Description of the design
  : The design shows a CARABINIER and in the background the Palace of Monaco. At the top is the inscription ‘MONACO’ flanked by the mintmark and the mint master mark. At the bottom are the years ‘1817-2017’ and underneath the inscription ‘CARABINIERS DU PRINCE’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  :

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
#### In the Matter of the City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for the Clove Lakes Expressway, in the Borough of Richmond County. Herman Borgstede et al., as Executors *672of Dora Borgstede, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 35

 Providing for the appointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2017

  Mr. Boozman (for himself, Mr. Perdue, and Mr. Leahy) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy of the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson of New York on May 5, 2017, is filled 
by the appointment of Michael Govan of California. The appointment is 
for a term of 6 years, beginning on May 6, 2017, or the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later.
                                 <all>
```
#### 247.001 Definitions.

For definitions of “Civil Reserve Air Fleet” and “Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement,” see Joint Pub 1-02, DoD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. See additional information at PGI 247.001 for the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement program.

[75 FR 51417, >Aug. 20, 2010]
#### 252.227-7007 License term—running royalty.

As prescribed at 227.7009-4(b), insert the following clause in patent releases, license agreements, and assignments:

# License Term—Running Royalty (AUG 1984)

The license hereby granted shall remain in full force and effect for the full term of each of the patents referred to in the “License Grant” clause of this contract and any and all patents hereafter issued on applications for patent referred to above unless sooner terminated as elsewhere herein provided.

(End of clause)
DoT-osr-U> ll w o 1 oq 

Regional· Economic Development Corporation 

PO Box 518 

Rhinelander, WI 54501 

(715) 365 4468 

grownorth@ nicoletcollege.edu 

www .grownorth .org - ~; ' 

Board of Diredors 

2.012~2013 

Officers: 

Jim Brown- President 

Phil Albert" Vice President 

Bart Lamers - Past President 

(Technology Representative) 

Libby Burmaster- Secretary 

(Education Representative) 

Pete Otis· Treasurer· 

(Finance Representative} · 

County Representatives: 

Jimmy Landru Jr. 

Forest County 

Christine Berry 

Langlade County 

Jack Sroka 

Lincoln County 

Roger Luce 

Oneida County 

Bob Egan 

Vilas County 

Sector Representatives: 

Monica Hilt- Health Care 

Scott Sievert- Manufacturing 

Diane Hapka- Tourism 

Jim Hawkins- Tribal 

At large Members: 

Julie Berndt 

Tim Hintz 

Larry l<ind 

Jim Schuessler 

Collette Sergei 

Executive Director: 

Joe Hegge 

Grow North Exists to 

create, sustain and 

promote an 

environment 

conducive to regional 

economic 

development and 

pros!)erity. 

August 6, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Service Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket OST-2011~0109 Rhinelander, Wisconsin 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

I 

co 

<11 

Grow North Regional Economic Development Corporation (Grow North} is very supportive of 

the proposal for essential air transportation from SkyWest Airlines. We have reviewed the 

analysis provided by Joe Brauer, Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport Manager and Robert 

Heck, Airport Chair and agree that the SkyWest proposal provides the greatest benefit to the 

region. 

Grow North exists to promote an improved and sustainable economy in the Northwoods of 

Wisconsin. Our region has a large number {47%) of second homeowners from outside the 

area. In a recent survey these same people recognized flexible, reliable and. available 

commercial air travel as being of primary importance to increased time spent at their second 

homes. In addition, continued growth in our internationally competitive manufacturing 

firms such as Oldenburg Group, Superior Diesel, Wausau Paper, LaserPro, ABX, NEX, Red 

Arrow, Ponsse North America and Printpack:will be greatly influenced by reliable air service 

to major airline hubs. Continuation and improvement of commercial air travel will serve as a 

tremendous economic stimulus to the Northwoods of Wisconsin. 

With the acceptance of the SkyWest proposal, we feel that the area will be better served· 

into the future ensuring flexible, reliable and available commercial air travel. Thank you for 

your thoughtful consideration of our needs. 

Sincerely, 

Joe Hegge, Executive Director
#### 26.400 Scope of subpart.

This section implements the Federal Food Donation Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 1792).

[74 FR 11831, Mar. 19, 2009, as amended at 79 FR 24210, Apr. 29, 2014]
#### 2849.111 Review of proposed settlements.

The HCA or designee may establish procedures for the review and approval of settlement agreements at a level above the contracting officer. In addition, all proposed termination settlements shall be reviewed by legal counsel.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

IRENE RIOS

JUSTICES FOURTH COURT OF APPE ALS DISTRICT

CADENA

- REEVES JUSTIC E CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3 200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8205

- 3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4TH COA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE,

CLERK OF THE

COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335

- 2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335

- 2762

December 27, 2017

John R. Holderman

6202 Madeline

San Antonio, TX 78229

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Vicki Ann Gil

4100 Bunker Hill

San Antonio, TX 78230

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04

- 17

- 00701

- CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2013

- CI

- 20199
Style: Vicki A . Gil

v.

John R Holderman

Enclosed please find the order which the Hono rable Court of Appeals has
issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Cle rk of Court

_____________________________ Luz Estrada
Chief Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53219

cc: Dinah L. Gaines (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
Donna Kay McKinney (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 27, 2 017

No. 04

- 17

- 00701

- CV

Vicki A. GIL

, Appell ant

v.

John R HOLDERMAN

, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 20199
The Honorable Renée Yanta, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

After appellant filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs, we

abated this appeal, remanded the case to the trial court to resolve the court reporter’s contest, and
requested findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court. The findings of fact and

conclusions of law have been filed.
The trial court found appellant is able to afford the cost of the clerk’s record, but unable
to afford the cost of the appellate filing fees. Appellant has not challenged the trial court’s ruling,
and the clerk’s record has been paid for and filed in this court. We therefore order appell ant Vicki A. Gil to file the appellant’s brief by January 26, 2018.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of December, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table 5.Length and weight of juvenile fall chinook at three hatcheries and three estuaries in 1990. Tissues were composited for use in measuring exposure to contaminants. 

Table of Contents
#### 2822.807 Exemptions.

The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 22.807(a)(1).
p.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

87) IV-E-81 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/2008 11:58:00 AM Sheet 87 of 117 
P.2 

A-90-37 

I XI 

Meeting Notes 

Date: February 1, 2002 

Time: 10:00- 11:00 a.m. 

The purpose of the meeting was to share the current status of the NSR rulemaking effoi I 

Agenda and attendee list attached. 

Attachments 
P.3 

NEDA/CARP Meeting with 

Bill Harnett and the NSR Group 

February 1, 2002 

10:00-11:00 a.m. 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, C-300A 

Introductions 

Status of NSR Report 

3 Pollutant Bill and NSR Relief Mechanisms Potential for Industry 

Off-Ramp? 

Status of EPA NSR Rulemaking 

Schedules and NSR Transition Issues 

Possibility of Help on Aggregation, Debottlenecking, ODS De 

Minimis Thresholds 

Status Re Guidance on Combined Heat Projects, Combined Cycle 

Turbines, Single Cycle Turbines 

Projects with FLMs 

\\\DC 64622/1 #1469397 vl
Second Department,

July, 1964

(July 1, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Atlantic Beach Towers Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Walter G. Michaelis et al., Constituting the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, Appellants, and Jay Weil et al., on Behalf of Themselves and on Behalf of All Other Owners of Property in Atlantic Beach, Nassau County, et al., Similarly Situated, Intervenors-Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the former Civil Practice Act, to review and to annul a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hemp-stead, which denied petitioner’s application for a special use permit to build a hotel with parking facilities upon property of which it is the contract vendee, the Board of Zoning Appeals and the intervenors Jay Weil, 667 Ocean Avenue Corp., and the Incorporated Village of Atlanie Beach appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 7, 1963 upon the court’s decision, which: (a) annulled the determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals; *876(b) granted petitioner’s application for a special use permit subject to certain stated conditions; and (c) remitted the matter to the board for the sole purpose of determining whether compliance with such conditions has been effected. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and determination of the board confirmed, without costs. Findings of fact contained or implicit in the Special Term opinion which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. While the instant appeal was pending, the parking requirements and restrictions of the ordinance, insofar as they relate to hotels, beach and cabana clubs, were substantially amended by the Town Board. The result of such amendments is that the hotel proposed by the petitioner cannot comply with the ordinance now in effect. Parties obtain no vested rights in orders which are subject to review. Hence, this appeal must be decided upon the basis of the ordinance as it now exists *(Matter of Boardwalk & Seashore Corp.*v. *Murdock,*286 N. Y. 494; *Matter of Town Bd. of Town of Huntington v. Plonski,*13 A D 2d 704, affd. 10 N Y 2d 1035). In view of the provisions of the present ordinance, we must reverse the Special Term’s order and confirm the board’s determination. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
exv4w5







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 4.5




AMENDMENT NO. 3




TO THE

GLAXOSMITHKLINE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

(Amended and Restated Effective July 1, 2001, as

Amended Through November 26, 2002)




 






          Pursuant to resolutions of the Board of Directors of SmithKline Beecham Corporation, adopted
June 15, 2009, the GlaxoSmithKline Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) is amended as follows:





     1. Article 1 of the Plan is amended by adding the definition of “Corporate Transaction” to
read as follows:




“‘Corporate Transaction’ means a transaction pursuant to which the
Company or an Affiliated Company (i) acquires an ownership interest in an
employer such that such employer becomes an Affiliated Company, or (ii)
acquires substantially all of the assets of a trade or business of an
employer, as a result of which former employees of such employer become
Employees.”



     2. Article 2 of the Plan is amended by adding a Section 2.2.4 to read as follows:




“2.2.4 Corporate Transactions. Except as otherwise provided in
this Section 2.2.4, an individual who becomes an Employee as the direct
result of a Corporate Transaction shall not be treated as an Employee
before he is first credited with an Hour of Service. An employee of an
acquired company listed in Appendix C who became an Employee as the direct
result of a Corporate Transaction, and who subsequently became an Eligible
Employee as of the relevant eligibility service effective date listed in
Appendix C for such acquired company, shall be credited with a Period of
Service for purposes of Section 2.2.2.1(C) and Section 4.1.4 based on an
Employment Commencement Date determined as of his employment commencement
date with the acquired company.”



     3. The Plan is amended by adding an Appendix C in substantially the form attached hereto.



Executed this 22nd day of June, 2009.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION,

a GlaxoSmithKline company

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ William J. Mosher
 	 
	 	 	William J. Mosher 	 
	 	 	Vice President and Secretary 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



APPENDIX C




ACQUISITION TABLE



Pursuant to Section 2.2.4, an Employee shall be credited with a Period of Service for purposes of
Section 2.2.2.1(C) and Section 4.1.4 with an Employment Commencement Date determined based on his
employment commencement date with one of the acquired companies listed below, provided he is an
Eligible Employee of a Participating Company on the relevant Eligibility Service Effective Date:




	 	 	 
	Acquired Company	 	Eligibility Service Effective Date
	Corixa Corporation

	 	January 1, 2006
	ID Biomedical Corporation of Maryland

	 	June 26, 2006
	ID Biomedical Corporation of Northborough

	 	June 26, 2006
	CNS, Inc.

	 	January 22, 2007
	Praecis Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

	 	April 30, 2007
	Reliant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

	 	February 18, 2008
	Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

	 	July 3, 2008
	Genelabs Technology, Inc.

	 	February 9, 2009