alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul R. Flanders                                  
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|November 10, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: KMR Minden LP v. Harris County Appraisal District

Appellate case number: 01-13-00152-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-70247

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court for the trial court to enter written 

findings of facts and conclusions of law. The district clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the trial court’s written findings and conclusions. On January 14, 2014, 

appellee filed a motion to reinstate this appeal and set briefing deadlines. Accordingly, we grant 

appellee’s motion and REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Further, in light of the trial court’s written findings and conclusions, the Court ORDERS 

that appellant may file an amended or supplemental brief no later than February 7, 2014. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.7.

The court further ORDERS that appellee’s brief, if any, must be filed no later than the 

earlier of 30 days from the date the appellant’s amended or supplemental brief is filed. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:/s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 23, 2014
# CA2017320EN.01000201.xml

| 27.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 320/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 320/2

---

Corrigendum to DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion — Vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14) — Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2017/10375

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 271 A of 17 August 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 271 A of 17 August 2017

(2017/C 320 A/02)

On page 8, ‘Closing date’, first paragraph:

for:

for:

‘The closing date for registration is 29 September 2017, 12.00 noon Brussels time, after which online registrations will not be possible anymore.’,

read:

read:

‘The closing date for registration is 13 October 2017, 12.00 noon Brussels time, after which online registrations will not be possible anymore.’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOTH
THE DECEMBER 31, 1999 BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSES
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711512
<NAME> AMERICAN REPUBLIC REALTY FUND I

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         116,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      17,479,334
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,382,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,941,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     10,572,372
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,166,789)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,941,639
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,752,997
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,053,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             836,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (136,776)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (12.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Union News Company, a Division of American News Company, Inc., Appellant, and Retail Drug Cigar Soda Luncheonette Employees Union, Local 906, AFL-CIO, Respondent.

Order, entered on October 27, 1960, denying petitioner’s motion for a permanent stay of arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
# C_2017074EN.01000101.xml

| 10.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 March 2017

(2017/C 74/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0551 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4337 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86653 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5525 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0709 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0458 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,14 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3171 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5499 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9603 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4044 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4272 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1949 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5277 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4986 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 222,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,9979 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2912 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4312 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 135,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7002 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,117 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,6102 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,287 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3436 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8770 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,3995 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0551

JPY

Japanese yen

120,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4337

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86653

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5525

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0709

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0458

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,14

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3171

RON

Romanian leu

4,5499

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9603

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4044

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4272

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1949

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5277

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4986

KRW

South Korean won

1 222,35

ZAR

South African rand

13,9979

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2912

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4312

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 135,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7002

PHP

Philippine peso

53,117

RUB

Russian rouble

62,6102

THB

Thai baht

37,287

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3436

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8770

INR

Indian rupee

70,3995

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
2137.102 Policy. ( a ) The services under this contract are of vital interest to the Government and must be continued without interruption in the event the contract is terminated, unless the termination occurs as a result of OPM's failure to pay premiums on a timely basis.
( b ) The Contractor will be reimbursed for all reasonable phase-in and phase-out costs (i.e., costs incurred within the agreed-upon period after contract termination that result from phase-in and phase-out operations). The Contractor also will receive a risk or service charge for the full period after contract termination during which services are continued, not to exceed a pro rata portion of the risk or service charge for the final contract year. In addition, OPM will pay the Contractor an incentive amount, not to exceed the pro rata risk or service charge for the continuity of services period (LIFAR 2152.237-70), based on exceptional performance during the transition period to a new Contractor. The Contracting Officer will use the weighted guidelines method described in 2115.404-71 of this chapter in determining the incentive amount. The amount of the risk or service charge will be based upon the accurate and timely processing of benefit claims, the volume and validity of customer service complaints, the timeliness and adequacy of reports on operations, and responsiveness to OPM offices, insured individuals, beneficiaries, and Congress.
[70 FR 41153, July 18, 2005]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT HOWELL M. RAMSEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D21-757 September 15, 2021 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Howell M. Ramsey, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### 1319.812 Contract administration.

Awards under the Partnership Agreement are subject to 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(21). These contracts shall contain the clause 1352.219-70, *Section 8(a) Direct Award (Deviation),* which requires the contractor to notify the SBA and the contracting officer when ownership of the firm is being transferred.
----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/08/2011 11:02 AM

----- From: "Smith, Anne" <Anne.Smith@NERA.com> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/08/2011 11:01 AM Subject: Fw: OMB slides

From: Smith, Anne Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 09:51 PM To: Smith, Anne Subject: OMB slides

_______________________________ Anne Smith Senior Vice President

NERA Economic Consulting 1255 23rd Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20037 Tel: 1-202-466-9229, Fax: 1-202-466-3605 Anne.Smith@NERA.com

www.nera.com

_______________________________

This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you received this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information contained herein. Please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation.

OMB meeting 12-8-11.pdf
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

JOSEPH S. McGREAL, ) 

)

Plaintiff, ) 

)

v. ) Case No. 12 cv 05135

) 

THE VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK, an Illinois )

Municipal Corporation and a body politic, and )

Chief of Police TIMOTHY McCARTHY, )

Individually, and Patrol Commander ) Hon. Joan Humphrey Lefkow,

THOMAS KENEALY, individually, and ) Judge Presiding.

Police Lieutenant PATRICK DUGGAN, )

Individually, and Police Lieutenant ) Hon. Sidney I. Schenkier,

JOSEPH MITCHELL, individually, and Sergeant ) Magistrate Judge.

ANTHONY FARRELL, individually, and )

Sergeant SCOTT MALMBORG, individually, and ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Lieutenant JAMES BIANCHI, individually, )

)

Defendants. ) 

JOINT MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS 

CERTAIN DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE

Now come the Plaintiff, JOSEPH S. McGREAL, by and through his attorneys, John P. 

DeRose and Caitlyn F. DeRose of John P. DeRose & Associates, and Defendant THOMAS 

KENEALY, by and through his attorneys Michael William Condon of Hervas, Condon & 

Bersani, P.C., and Defendant JOSEPH MITCHELL, by and through his attorneys, James J. 

Convery, Joseph M. Gagliardo, and Gregory R. James, Jr. of Laner Muchin, Ltd., and 

Defendants ANTHONY FARRELL and SCOTT MALMBORG, by and through their attorneys, 

Jason A. Guisinger, Lance C. Malina, and James W. Fessler of Klein, Thorpe and Jenkins, Ltd.

and jointly move, acknowledge, and agree that after discovery taken in the above-captioned 

cause, the case against these certain individually named defendants should be dismissed with 

Case: 1:12-cv-05135 Document #: 172 Filed: 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2205
prejudice. After consultation by counsel with their respective clients in the above-captioned 

cause, an agreement has been reached that the parties will bear their own costs, expenses, and 

attorney fees.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Joseph S. McGreal, Defendant Thomas Kenealy, Defendant 

Joseph Mitchell, Defendant Anthony Farrell, and Defendant Scott Malmborg move this 

Honorable Court to enter an order dismissing the above-captioned cause against these certain 

named defendants with prejudice, with each party to bear his own costs, expenses, and attorney 

fees.

IT IS SO MOVED, ACKNOWLEDGED, AND AGREED:

/s/John P. DeRose /s/ Michael William Condon

Attorney for Joseph S. McGreal Attorney for Thomas Kenealy

John P. DeRose & Associates Hervas, Condon & Bersani, P.C.

15 Spinning Wheel Road 333 Pierce Road

Suite 428 Suite 195

Hinsdale, IL 60521 Itasca, IL 60143

(630) 920-1111 office (630) 773-4774 office

john@johnderoselaw.com mcondon@hcbattorneys.com

/s/James J. Convery /s/ Jason A. Guisinger

Attorney for Joseph Mitchell Attorney for Anthony Farrell and Scott Malmborg

Laner Muchin, Ltd. Klein, Thorpe and Jenkins, Ltd.

515 N. State Street 20 North Wacker Drive

Suite 2800 Suite 1660

Chicago, IL 60654 Chicago, IL 60606

(312) 467-9800 office (312) 984-6400 office

jconvery@lanermuchin.com jaguisinger@ktjlaw.com

Case: 1:12-cv-05135 Document #: 172 Filed: 11/14/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2205
27.406-2 Additional data requirements. ( a ) In some contracting situations, such as experimental, developmental, research, or demonstration contracts, it may not be feasible to ascertain all the data requirements at contract award. The clause at 52.227-16, Additional Data Requirements, may be used to enable the subsequent ordering by the contracting officer of additional data first produced or specifically used in the performance of these contracts as the actual requirements become known. The clause shall normally be used in solicitations and contracts involving experimental, developmental, research or demonstration work (other than basic or applied research to be performed under a contract solely by a university or college when the contract amount will be $500,000 or less) unless all the requirements for data are believed to be known at the time of contracting and specified in the contract. If the contract is for basic or applied research to be performed by a university or college, and the contracting officer believes the contract effort will in the future exceed $500,000, even though the initial award does not, the contracting officer may include the clause in the initial award.
( b ) Data may be ordered under the clause at 52.227-16 at any time during contract performance or within a period of 3 years after acceptance of all items to be delivered under the contract. The contractor is to be compensated for converting the data into the prescribed form, for reproduction, and for delivery. In order to minimize storage costs for the retention of data, the contracting officer may relieve the contractor of the retention requirements for specified data items at any time during the retention period required by the clause. The contracting officer may permit the contractor to identify and specify in the contract data not to be ordered for delivery under the clause if the data is not necessary to meet the Government's requirements for data. Also, the contracting officer may alter the clause by deleting the term “or specifically used” in paragraph (a) of the clause if delivery of the data is not necessary to meet the Government's requirements for data. Any data ordered under this clause will be subject to the clause at 52.227-14, Rights in Data—General, (or other equivalent clause setting forth the respective rights of the Government and the contractor) in the contract. Data authorized to be withheld under such clause will not be required to be delivered under the clause at 52.227-16, except as provided in Alternate II or Alternate III, if included (see 27.404-2(c) and (d)).
( c ) Absent an established program for dissemination of computer software, agencies should not order additional computer software under the clause at 52.227-16, for the sole purpose of disseminating or marketing the software to the public. In ordering software for internal purposes, the contracting officer shall consider, consistent with the Government's needs, not ordering particular source codes, algorithms, processes, formulas, or flow charts of the software if the contractor shows that this aids its efforts to disseminate or market the software.
11-i CHAPTER 11: LIFE-CYCLE COST SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
11.1 INTRODUCTION

.................................................... 11-1 11.2 PURCHASE PRICE INCREASES

....................................... 11-111-1 CHAPTER 11: LIFE-CYCLE COST SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS
11.1 INTRODUCTION The life-cycle cost (LCC) sub-group analysis evaluates impacts on any identifiable groups or customers who may be disproportionately affected by any national energy-efficiency standard level. The Department will conduct this evaluation for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR), in part, by analyzing the LCC and payback periods for those customers that fall into identified sub-groups. The Department plans to evaluate variations in energy prices and variations in energy use that might affect the net present value (NPV) of a standard to customer sub-populations. To the extent possible, the Department will obtain estimates of the variability of each input parameter and will consider this variability in its calculation of customer impacts. Variations in energy losses for a particular type of transformer depend mainly on the varying load levels that the transformer serves, which in turn vary on factors such as type of load, climate, and time of day. The Department plans to perform sensitivity analyses to consider how differences in energy use will affect sub-groups of customers. The Department will determine the impact on customer sub-groups using the LCC spreadsheet model. The spreadsheet model used for the LCC analysis can be used with different data inputs. The standard LCC analysis (described in Chapter 8) includes various types of distribution transformers and user groups. The LCC for any sub-group, such as rural electric cooperatives, municipal utilities, or specific classes of commercial or industrial customers, can be analyzed using the LCC spreadsheet model by sampling only that sub-group. (Chapter 8 explains in detail the inputs to the spreadsheet used in determining LCC and payback periods.)

11.2 PURCHASE PRICE INCREASES As discussed in the engineering analysis (Chapter 5), the first cost of a transformer tends to increase as its efficiency increases. Identifiable population groups, such as rural electric cooperatives or municipal utilities, may not be able to afford significant increases in equipment prices that might result from a standard. To avoid negative impacts on these population groups, the Department will be especially sensitive to increases in the purchase price of transformers. For customer sub-groups that are sensitive to price, increases in first costs of a product can normally delay or preclude the purchase of a new model of that product. Since distribution transformers are an integral part of the electrical supply system, users must replace failed units and incur the financial impacts associated with increased first costs.
# C_2017096EN.01000301.xml

| 28.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 March 2017

(2017/C 96/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0889 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4404 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86403 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5503 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0713 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2188 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,21 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2641 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5491 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9203 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4261 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4536 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4584 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5416 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5149 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 207,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,7610 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4895 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4395 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 486,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8055 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,516 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,8655 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,404 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3980 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4918 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,8170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0889

JPY

Japanese yen

119,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4404

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86403

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5503

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0713

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2188

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,21

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2641

RON

Romanian leu

4,5491

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9203

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4261

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4536

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4584

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5416

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5149

KRW

South Korean won

1 207,95

ZAR

South African rand

13,7610

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4895

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4395

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 486,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8055

PHP

Philippine peso

54,516

RUB

Russian rouble

61,8655

THB

Thai baht

37,404

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3980

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4918

INR

Indian rupee

70,8170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---