alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 27 

Honoring the life and achievements of Eugene A. ‘‘Gene’’ Cernan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. NELSON, Mr. PETERS, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. INHOFE, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. GARDNER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to with an amended preamble 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and achievements of Eugene A. ‘‘Gene’’ 

Cernan. 

Whereas Gene Cernan was born on March 14, 1934, in Chicago, Illinois, was raised in the suburban towns of Bellwood and Maywood, and graduated from Proviso Township High School; 

Whereas Gene Cernan began his career as a basic flight 

trainee in the United States Navy; 

Whereas Gene Cernan was one of fourteen astronauts selected by NASA in October 1963 to participate in the 

Gemini and Apollo programs; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 27 ATS 

Whereas Gene Cernan was the second American to have 

walked in space having spanned the circumference of the 

world twice in a little more than 21⁄2 hours in 1966 during the Gemini 9 mission; 

Whereas Gene Cernan served as the lunar module pilot for 

Apollo 10 in 1969, which was referred to as the ‘‘dress 

rehearsal’’ for Apollo 11’s historic landing on the Moon; 

Whereas Gene Cernan was commander of Apollo 17 in 1972, 

during the last human mission to the Moon; 

Whereas Gene Cernan maintains the distinction of being the 

last man to have left his footprints on the surface of the 

Moon; 

Whereas Gene Cernan was one of the three men to have 

flown to the Moon on two occasions; 

Whereas Gene Cernan logged 566 hours and 15 minutes in 

space, of which more than 73 hours were spent on the 

surface of the Moon; 

Whereas Gene Cernan and the crew of Apollo 17 set records 

that still stand today, for longest manned lunar landing 

flight, longest lunar surface extra vehicular activities, 

largest lunar sample return, and longest time in lunar 

orbit; 

Whereas Gene Cernan retired from the Navy after 20 years 

and ended his NASA career in July 1976; and 

Whereas, on January 16, 2017, Gene Cernan passed away in 

Houston, Texas, leaving behind a vibrant history of space 

exploration and advocacy for NASA, a legacy of inspiring 

young people to ‘‘dream the impossible’’, and a documentary that encourages continual human space exploration: 

Now, therefore, be it 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 27 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the life of Gene 

2 Cernan, a Naval aviator, fighter pilot, electrical engineer, 

3 and the last astronaut to walk on the Moon. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Table 7.Grand means (GM) and calculated odds ratios/relative risks for significant (p < 0.05) risk factors (site of capture, age, and gender) for three categories of kidney lesions in English sole. Odds ratios for the site of capture are interpreted relative to the reference sites of Nisqually Reach and Bodega Bay. Odds ratios for age (in years ) represent the effect of each additional year of age on the odds of disease occurrence. N = 413 individuals. Lesion Risk factorOdds ratio/relative riskNecrotic lesions (GM = 0.643E-2) agefemale1.5440.096Sclerotic lesions (GM = 0.977E-3) Commencement Bayage7.2801.540Proliferative lesions (GM = 0.494) Boca de Quadra27.630
Table 10. Grand means (GM) and calculated odds ratios/relative risks for significant (p < 0.05) risk factors (site of capture, age, and gender) for six categories of hepatic lesions in hornyhead turbot. Odds ratios for the site of capture are interpreted relative to the combined data for the reference sites at Dana Point. Odds ratios for age (in years) represent the effect of each additional year of age on the odds of disease occurrence. N = 387 individuals. Lesion Risk factorOdds ratio/relative riskNeoplasms (GM = 0.665E-4) age1.540Foci of cellular alteration (GM = 0.781E-2) noneProliferative lesions (GM = 0.592E-2) noneSpecific degeneration/necrosis (GM = 0.131E-1) noneHydropic vacuolation (GM = 0.333E-4) noneNecrosis (GM = 0.821E-2) outside San Diego Bayage3.5321.230
exv10w7






Exhibit 10.7




CA, Inc.




Summary description of special retirement vesting provisions available to certain

Senior Management




     On May 19, 2009, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of
CA, Inc. (the “Company”) approved an amendment to the vesting terms for the one-year performance
award agreements and three-year performance award agreements under Section 4.6 of the Company’s
2002 Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of April 27, 2007) and the Company’s 2007
Incentive Plan, respectively, to certain members of senior management (the “Participants”) who have
recently retired.



     Under the amendment, with respect to the Participants’ outstanding one-year performance share
awards, such shares will vest 70% on the date of delivery of the shares, with the remaining shares
being forfeited after retirement, instead of one-third of such shares vesting on the date of
delivery, with the remaining shares being forfeited upon retirement.



     Under the amendment, with respect to the Participants’ outstanding three-year performance
share awards, such shares will vest at the end of the applicable performance cycle based upon
actual performance achieved over the entire performance cycle and will prorated based on the number
of days employed from the beginning of the applicable performance cycle through the date of such
Participant’s retirement, instead of any unvested shares being forfeited upon retirement.
#### In the Matter of Neal J. Sheehan, Petitioner, v. Robert A. Glasser et al., Constituting the Harness Racing Commission of the State of New York, Respondents.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                  
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|August 12, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 29 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 29

    Recognizing January 28, 2017, as ``National Data Privacy Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2017

 Mr. Daines submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing January 28, 2017, as ``National Data Privacy Day''.

Whereas, on January 28, 2017, National Data Privacy Day is recognized;
Whereas technology has enhanced our ability to communicate, learn, and work and 
        is now a part of our everyday lives;
Whereas personal information has become a form of currency;
Whereas it is easier now than ever before to share personal information with 
        friends, colleagues, and companies;
Whereas the sharing of personal information may compromise the privacy of 
        individuals if appropriate protective action is not taken;
Whereas governments, corporations, and individuals have a role in protecting the 
        privacy of individuals; and
Whereas National Data Privacy Day constitutes a nationwide effort to educate and 
        raise awareness about respecting privacy and safeguarding data: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes January 28, 2017, as ``National Data Privacy 
        Day''; and
            (2) encourages governments, individuals, privacy 
        professionals, educators, corporations, and other relevant 
        organizations to take steps to protect the privacy of 
        individuals.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016385EN.01000401.xml

| 19.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 October 2016

(2016/C 385/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0993 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4407 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89565 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7025 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0886 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9565 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3184 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5110 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,4078 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4332 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4382 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5294 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5280 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5242 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 238,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4413 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4060 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5023 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 323,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6086 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,934 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,1488 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,541 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5073 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5713 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,3345 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0993

JPY

Japanese yen

114,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4407

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89565

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7025

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0886

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9565

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3184

RON

Romanian leu

4,5110

TRY

Turkish lira

3,4078

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4332

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4382

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5294

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5280

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5242

KRW

South Korean won

1 238,27

ZAR

South African rand

15,4413

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4060

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5023

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 323,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6086

PHP

Philippine peso

52,934

RUB

Russian rouble

69,1488

THB

Thai baht

38,541

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5073

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5713

INR

Indian rupee

73,3345

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 2401.403 Individual deviations.

The Senior Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 1.403.

[77 FR 73525, Dec. 10, 2012]
# C_2017029EN.01000102.xml

| 28.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8340 — Riverstone/AMCI/Fitzroy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 29/02)

On 23 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8340. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8340. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# Europos Sąjungos C 394A/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 394A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 58 tomas2015m. lapkričio 27d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 394A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

58 tomas2015m. lapkričio 27d.

---

| Pranešimo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Nuomonės |
| | ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS |
| | Eurojustas |
| 2015/C 394A/01 | Pranešimas dėl Eurojusto administracijos direktoriaus laisvų pareigybių (AD 14 rangas) — Haga (Nyderlandai) – 15/EJ/04 | 1 |

Pranešimo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

V   Nuomonės

ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS

Eurojustas

2015/C 394A/01

Pranešimas dėl Eurojusto administracijos direktoriaus laisvų pareigybių (AD 14 rangas) — Haga (Nyderlandai) – 15/EJ/04

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

V Nuomonės

ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS

Eurojustas

| 27.11.2015 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2015

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 394/1

---

PRANEŠIMAS DĖL EUROJUSTO ADMINISTRACIJOS DIREKTORIAUS LAISVŲ PAREIGYBIŲ (AD 14 RANGAS)

Haga (Nyderlandai) – 15/EJ/04

(2015/C 394 A/01)

Eurojustas kviečia pateikti paraiškas Eurojusto administracijos direktoriaus pareigoms užimti. Eurojustas buvo įkurtas 2002 m., siekiant pagerinti valstybių narių kompetentingų institucijų efektyvumą kovojant su sunkiais, tarptautinio pobūdžio nusikaltimais ir organizuotu nusikalstamumu. Eurojustą sudaro prokurorų, teisėjų arba policijos pareigūnų Kolegija, atsakanti už šios institucijos organizaciją ir veiklą. Administracijos direktorius, prižiūrint Kolegijos prezidentui, atsako už kasdieninį Eurojusto administravimą ir personalo valdymą. Norėdami peržiūrėti detalų pranešimą apie laisvas pareigas ir paraiškos pateikimo procedūrą, prašome apsilankyti mūsų tinklalapyje:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

Paskutinis paraiškos pateikimo terminas – 2016 m. sausio 31 d. iki vidurnakčio Centrinės Europos laiku.

---
1Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-30117

Summary Calendar

JOHNNY R. VINSON

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana]

(95-CV-2216)

May 26, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Appellant Vinson appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment for Appellee General Electric Company. We affirm.

Vinson sued his employer, General Electric Company, under

Title VII alleging that it discharged him because he had testified

in a discrimination case brought years earlier by a co- employee.
2

General Electric moved for summary judgment contending that

Vinson’s claim was time barred and that he had been fired for poor

job performance and not because of his earlier testimony. The

district court agreed on both grounds.

42 U.S.C. § 2000-5(e) requires that as a prerequisite to suit

an employee must file a discrimination charge with the EEOC within

180 days of the unlawful conduct. This period begins to run from

the date the employee is given notice of dismissal. It is

undisputed that the EEOC charge was not filed within that period.

Vinson argues that he is entitled to an extension of that period,

but the reasons he advances do not comply with any of the

exceptions recognized by this court in Barrow v. New Orleans

Steamship Assn., 932 F.2d 473, 478 (5th Cir. 1991). The district

court did not err in finding the claim time barred.

Even if the claim was not time barred, the district court’s

alternative basis for its grant of summary judgment is correct.

Appellant has not created an issue of material fact on the question

of his testimony in the prior case being the cause of the

discharge.

AFFIRMED.
New!
      - Needs Analysis: Pre-application Technical Assistance     PDF  (1.1 MB)
      - UISFL Program Press Kit –    PDF  (6.84M)
      - Listen to 2 GoGlobalEd Podcast episodes focusing on the Title VI UISFL program: 

Title VI Deep Dive: Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language Program (UISFL). A conversation with Tanyelle Richardson, (IFLE) and Bill Phelan (Cornell University, 2018 institutional recipient of a UISFL grant): Listen to learn more about UISFL Grants (24:20)

An Interview with Dr. David Flaten, Ph.D., Professor of History at Tompkins Cortland Community College, which benefitted from part of Cornell University’s 2018 UISFL grant. Listen to Dr. David Flaten on the Podcast (14:10) 

## Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language Google Maps

This series of maps highlights different types of projects that your colleagues have recently worked on, or are currently working on, with funds from IFLE competitive grants.

**Program Maps**

**FY 2022**
Google Map of IFLE FY 2022 Grantees
**FY 2017**
Google Map of IFLE FY 2017 Grantees
****
**FY 2016**
Google Map of IFLE FY 2016 Grantees
**FY 2015**
Google Map of IFLE FY 2015 Grantees

**FY  2014 Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) Projects** -  This map shows the UISFL grants awarded by International and Foreign Language  Education (IFLE), U.S. Department of Education for FY 2014.

**FY  2012 Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) Projects** -  This map shows the UISFL grants awarded by International and Foreign Language  Education (IFLE), U.S. Department of Education for FY 2012.

**FY 2011** – No new awards

**FY 2010 Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) Projects** - This map shows the UISFL grants awarded by  International and Foreign Language Education (IFLE), U.S. Department of Education for FY 2010.

## Additional Resources

- International Resource Information System (IRIS):  a performance reporting system and searchable database for 14 international education programs
- OPE - Applicant and Grantee Resources 
- Fiscal Year 2018 UISFL Webinar

IFLE Home
#### 242.7401 Procedures.

When the program, project, or system manager determines that a technical representative is required, follow the procedures at PGI 242.7401.

[70 FR 67921, Nov. 9, 2005]
#### David Vogel, Inc., Respondent, v. John S. Spraker et al., Appellants. Arthur E. Fuss et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dorothy S. Francke, as Executrix of John S. Spraker, Deceased, et al., Appellants, and David Vogel et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Order entered December 1, 1960, denying motion for consolidation, unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion so as to direct a joint trial of the actions pursuant to section 96-a of the Civil Practice Act; and as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Both actions involve the matter of brokers’ commissions concerning the sale of Pier 13, North River, to the City of New York and the actions have common issues upon which the same witnesses will testify. Although the trial of the Vogel action is imminent, and, in the Fuss action a note of issue has not yet been filed, it appears that the examinations before trial in the latter action have been completed. Hence, no prejudicial delay will result if a joint trial is directed, whereas the interest of justice, the conservation of the time of the courts and the convenience of the parties and witnesses will be served by such procedure. The joint trial is ordered on condition that the moving defendants immediately file a statement of readiness and note of issue in the Fuss action, waive all further preliminary proceedings therein, and that both actions be tried when the Vogel action is reached for trial, with the right of the plaintiff in Action No. 1 to open and close at the joint trial. Settle order accordingly, containing provision for the joint trial in the February Term of the court. Concur— Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
# C_2016450EN.01000601.xml

| 2.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 450/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 450/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8109 — FIH Mobile/Feature Phone Business of Microsoft Mobile)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 450/02)

On 22 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8109. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8109. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---