alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017054EN.01000501.xml

| 21.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 February 2017

(2017/C 54/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0616 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4333 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85145 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4785 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0650 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8568 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,26 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3246 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5218 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8481 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3835 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3918 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2392 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4772 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5057 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 218,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,9176 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3011 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4485 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 181,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7335 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,462 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,6215 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,177 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2884 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7273 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,0625 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0616

JPY

Japanese yen

120,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4333

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85145

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4785

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0650

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8568

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,26

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3246

RON

Romanian leu

4,5218

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8481

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3835

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3918

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2392

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4772

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5057

KRW

South Korean won

1 218,35

ZAR

South African rand

13,9176

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3011

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4485

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 181,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7335

PHP

Philippine peso

53,462

RUB

Russian rouble

61,6215

THB

Thai baht

37,177

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2884

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7273

INR

Indian rupee

71,0625

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Alfredo Miranda } 

} 

} Case No. 12cv4439 

v } 

} 

} 

County of Lake, et al } 

TRANSFER OF CASE TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR REASSIGNMENT

It appearing that the above-captioned case requires further judicial action, I therefore 

recommend to the Executive Committee that this case be reassigned by lot to an active judge of 

this court. The reasons for my recommendation are indicated on the reverse of this form. 

THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK

/s/ Sarah McCarthy

Deputy Clerk 

Dated: October 18, 2018 

ORDER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign the above-captioned case 

by lot to the calendar of an active judge of this court in accordance with the Rules.

ENTER:

FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

________________________________

 Chief Judge Rubén Castillo 

Dated: October 18, 2018 

Honorable John Z. Lee

Case: 1:12-cv-04439 Document #: 327 Filed: 10/18/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:14359
IOP13(b) [ ] This cause is currently pending on the Fugitive Calendar having previously 

been assigned to the calendar of who is no longer sitting; it is recommended 

that it be reassigned to the calendar of an active judge of this court, the 

defendant no longer being a fugitive.

LR40.5 [ X ] Pursuant to the provisions of LR 40.5, this cause is to be reassigned by lot 

having been reversed and remanded pursuant to a mandate issued by the 

U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit.

IOP13(J) [ ] This cause having last been assigned to the calendar of who is no longer 

sitting; it is recommended that it be reassigned to the calendar of an active 

judge of this court as it appears to require further judicial action.

Case: 1:12-cv-04439 Document #: 327 Filed: 10/18/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:14360
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

09/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.11 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 121 

Designating April 11, 2017, as the ‘‘National Birthday of the U.S. Navy 

Submarine Force’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6 (legislative day, APRIL 4), 2017 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 11, 2017, as the ‘‘National Birthday of 

the U.S. Navy Submarine Force’’. 

Whereas, for 117 years, the broad strategic and tactical advantages created by the submarine force of the Navy (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘Submarine Force’’) 

have enhanced the national security of the United States 

through undersea missions; 

Whereas, over the course of the last 11 decades, the submarines of the Navy have advanced through 4 generations; 

Whereas the Navy first acquired a commissioned submarine, 

the USS Holland (SS–1), on April 11, 1900; 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 121 IS 

Whereas the first generation submarines of the Navy rapidly 

evolved from small, limited-capability submersibles to a 

dominant force in naval warfare; 

Whereas the second generation submarines of the Navy, defined by the heroes of World War II, made a decisive difference in a war in which control of the sea was crucial; 

Whereas the third generation submarines of the Navy, defined by the Cold War and the use of nuclear power, 

helped prevent a nuclear world war and secured the interests of the United States; 

Whereas the modern, fourth generation submarines of the 

Navy use long-range sensors and weapons to stay ahead 

of global threats and preserve freedom of navigation in 

the global maritime environment; 

Whereas, in 2017, the Submarine Force consists of 52 attack, 14 ballistic missile, and 4 guided missile submarines that enable the Navy to win wars, prevent conflicts, and defeat threats posed by terrorists; 

Whereas, throughout the history of the Submarine Force, the 

1 constant has been the tremendous character, courage, 

and dedication of the men and women who maintain, 

equip, and train and fight in the submarines of the Navy; 

and 

Whereas April 11, 2017, marks the 117th birthday of the 

Submarine Force and is an appropriate date to designate 

as the ‘‘National Birthday of the U.S. Navy Submarine 

Force’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 11, 2017, as the ‘‘National 

3 Birthday of the U.S. Navy Submarine Force’’; and 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 121 IS 

1 (2) acknowledges the critical role that the men 

2 and women of the submarine force of the Navy fulfill 

3 in defending the United States. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
April 1st, 2013

Sirs

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

REF. Comments in Support of Resolution 787

To Whom It May Concern,

By means of the following communication, we want to confirm that Taca International Airline, S.A., Avianca 

and TACA Airlines, support IATA ́s Resolution 787 – termed as New Distribution Capability – NDC- taking into 

account that it constitutes an updated data transmission standard based on XML, and thus it will make it 

easier, faster and more economic to provide the customer with more information about fare alternatives, 

ancillary services, on board amenities and graphics such as pictures and seat maps.

Given the fact that NDC will further include new technology using messaging through XML based protocols and 

web services that will enable transparency and consistency in airline pricing, products and services across all 

channels and greater customer personalization and offering in the shopping process, we consider that we 

should support the initiative. 

In addition to the above, it is important to bear in mind that carriers and travel agents need real time dynamics 

that allow interactive contact with their customers; and through the use of NDC, it seems that we will be able 

to avoid current constraints with existing EDIFACT messages.

NDC will also enable a dynamic distribution model that will provide a better access to distribution channels for 

providers and customers that is currently possible only through the airlines’ own websites.

Yours sincerely, 

María Elena Arévalo

Aeronautical Affairs manager

Mariaelena.arevalo@aviancataca.com

TACA International Airlines, S.A.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.1






                              ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


         Reference is hereby made to the Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of
June 21, 1993 (the "Stockholders' Agreement"), among Associated Materials
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and certain of its
stockholders.

         The undersigned is acquiring shares of Stock (such term and any other
capitalized term used herein to have the meanings specified in the
Stockholders' Agreement, for the benefit of the Company and each Stockholder
and other beneficiary under the Stockholders' Agreement, the undersigned hereby
expressly assumes, confirms and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions
of the Stockholders' Agreement and to perform and observe each and every one of
the covenants, rights, promises, agreements, terms, conditions, obligations and
duties of a Stockholder under the Stockholders' Agreement.

         From and after the date hereof, all references to a "Stockholder" or
the "Stockholders" in the Stockholders' Agreement shall be deemed to be
references to the undersigned (along with the other Stockholders).

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Assumption
Agreement as of this 16th day of February, 2000.



                                          PCG FINANCE COMPANY II, LLC



                                          By: /s/ B. Ross Smead
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name:  B. Ross Smead
                                              Title: Vice President
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
#### 212.7005 Congressional notification.

See PGI 212.7005 for congressional notification requirements for contracts valued at more than $100 million that are awarded pursuant to a CSO.
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Negotiated Rulemaking**

**Gainful Employment**

**December 4-7, 2017, 9:00am – 5:00 pm**

**AGENDA**

**Welcome**

**Introductions**

**Overview of the negotiated rulemaking process**

**Review and adopt protocols**

**Petitions for membership**

**Overview of the issues**

**Formally finalize agenda**

**Discussion of issues**

**Next steps**

· Meeting 2:  February 5-8, 2018

· Meeting Summary

· Other
#### ROSSEAU v. HALLENBECK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

January 17, 1906.)

The court is not justified in wholly discrediting plaintiff’s testimony, she being uncontradicted and unimpeached, and her story not improbable, and there having been persons who might have been called to contradict her, if her testimony’ had been untrue in any particular.

Evidence—Testimony oe . Party—Credibility. "

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 20, Cent. Dig. Evidence, § 2438.J

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Twelfth-District.

Action by Florence R. Rosseau against Plarry C. Hallenbeck. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before SCOTT, P. J„ and -BLANCHARD and DOW-LING, JJ. -

Ferguson & Ferguson (L. C. Ferguson, of counsel), for appellant.

McBurney & McBurney (Elgin L. McBurney, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the court below was justified in wholly discrediting.plaintiff’s testimony as to the retention of the dress suit case. She was uncóntradicted'and unimpeached, and her story was not improbable. If it had been untrue in any particular there were employes of the hotel who might have been called to-contradict her. Of course, on the question of value of the articles said to have been contained in the case, the plaintiff testified' mainly as to her opinion, and not as to a fact. We have not, however, considered any question respecting the damages since they are not important on this appeal.- - - • .

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cagle’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 (the “Report”), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   J. Douglas Cagle                            |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J.   Douglas Cagle                                |   |
| Chairman,   Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| (Principal   Executive Officer)                   |   |
| Date:    February 10, 2011              |   |

 

1

----
## Litigation Updates Applicable to certain institutions  (Last Updated 9/8/2020)

The CARES Act Higher Education Emergency  Relief Fund-IHE/Student Aid provides funding to institutions to provide  emergency financial aid grants to students whose lives have been disrupted,  many of whom are facing financial challenges and struggling to make ends meet. 

Students cannot apply for assistance directly  from the U.S. Department of Education but should contact their institutions for  further information and guidance. Institutions have the responsibility of  determining how grants will be distributed to students, how the amount of each  student grant is calculated, and the development of any instructions or  directions that are provided to students about the grant. 

### How to Apply for Funding: HEERF-Student Aid

- Grants.gov  Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants 
-  Guide  for how to apply for funding in GRANTS.gov :      - Visual Aid   (1.2M)  
  -  How to upload a Workspace 

### CARES HEERF Certification and Agreement - Student Portion 

### Formula allocations

-  Allocations for Section 18004(a)(1) of CARES Act
-   Methodology for Calculating Allocations 

### Frequently Asked Questions

- Cares Act HEERF Emergency  Financial Aid Grants to Students under Section 18004(a)(1) and 18004(c) FAQs  (Issued April 9, 2020 and revised January 28, 2021)
Please  see the updated statement referencing this document referencing  this document on our HEERF Litigation Updates Page Here

- Cares Act HEERF Student  FAQs  (Issued May 15, 2020 revised January 28, 2021)
- Internal  Revenue Service FAQs regarding CARES Act Grants  (External Site)

### Contact

The funding opportunity  number is ED-GRANTS-041020-003. If you have questions concerning this  program, please submit them via e-mail to HEERF@ed.gov, or  by phone, at 202-377-3711. 

Cares Act HEERF Home
#### 227.7105-3 Acquisition of modified existing works.

Use the clause at 252.227-7020, Rights in Special Works, in solicitations and contracts for modified existing works in lieu of the clause at 252.227-7021, Rights in Data—Existing Works.
# C_2016474EN.01000102.xml

| 17.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 474/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 474/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8247 — Aurelius Equity Opportunities/Office Depot (Netherlands))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 474/02)

On 13 December 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8247. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8247. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
2413.305-2 Agency responsibilities. ( c ) Policies and procedures governing the operation of imprest funds are established in internal directives issued by HUD's Office of the Chief Financial Officer.
[60 FR 46155, Sept. 5, 1995. Redesignated at 64 FR 46095, Aug. 23, 1999]
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT C

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$52,500                                                     Kirkland, Washington
                                                                  March 13, 2000

         For value received, the undersigned promises to pay Rosetta
Inpharmatics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), at its principal
office the principal sum of $52,000 with interest from the date hereof at a rate
of 6.35% per annum, compounded semiannually, on the unpaid balance of such
principal sum. Such principal and interest shall be due and payable on March 13,
2002.

         If the undersigned's employment or consulting relationship with the
Company is terminated prior to payment in full of this Note, this Note shall be
due and payable.

         Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States
of America. AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THIS NOTE MAY BE PREPAID AT ANY TIME WITHOUT
INTEREST OR PENALTY.

         Should suit be commenced to collect any sums due under this Note, such
sum as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys' fees.
The makers and endorsers have severally waived presentment for payment, protest,
notice of protest, and notice of nonpayment of this Note.

         This Note, which is full recourse, is secured by a pledge of certain
shares of Common Stock of the Company and is subject to the terms of a Pledge
and Security Agreement between the undersigned and the Company of even date
herewith.

                                               /s/ Gregory Sessler
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Gregory Sessler
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Flow International Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), for the year ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN R.
LIGHT                                      
|Stephen R. Light Principal Executive Officer January 29, 2007
#### In the Matter of Kenneth Skinner, Petitioner, v. Westchester County Department of Public Welfare et al., Respondents.
# C_2017094EN.01000201.xml

| 25.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 March 2017

(2017/C 94/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0805 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4378 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86600 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5373 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0718 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1793 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,81 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2695 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5527 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9176 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4182 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4448 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3933 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5401 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5126 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 210,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4816 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4406 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4198 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 399,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7800 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,254 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,6859 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,353 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3845 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4282 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,6520 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0805

JPY

Japanese yen

120,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4378

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86600

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5373

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0718

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1793

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,81

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2695

RON

Romanian leu

4,5527

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9176

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4182

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4448

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3933

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5401

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5126

KRW

South Korean won

1 210,37

ZAR

South African rand

13,4816

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4406

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4198

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 399,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7800

PHP

Philippine peso

54,254

RUB

Russian rouble

61,6859

THB

Thai baht

37,353

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3845

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4282

INR

Indian rupee

70,6520

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---