alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017444EN.01000501.xml

| 23.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 444/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 444/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 444/06)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Italy

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 70th Anniversary of the Coming into Force of the Italian Constitution

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : Enrico De Nicola, provisional Head of State, signs the act of promulgation of the Constitution of the Italian Republic on December 27, 1947; on his right, the Head of Government Alcide De Gasperi, on the left, Umberto Terracini, President of the Italian Constituent Assembly. Above, the inscription ‘COSTITUZIONE’ and the monogram of the Italian Republic ‘RI’; in exergue, the inscription ‘CON SICURA COSCIENZA’, ‘R’, the mintmark of the Mint of Rome, and the dates ‘1948 • 2018’, respectively year of the coming into force of the Italian Constitution and year of the issue of the coin.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
  :

Estimated number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : January 2018

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
The Education Amendments Act of 1972 authorized the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare to improve postsecondary educational opportunities by providing assistance to educational institutions and agencies for a broad range of reforms and innovations. The specific authority is now contained in Title VII of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

The Higher Education Opportunity Act (Public Law 110-315) (HEOA) was enacted on August 14, 2008. This law reauthorizes and extends the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.  The Higher Education Act (HEA) provides the statutory authority for most of the programs administered by OPE, as well as for the Federal Student Aid Programs.

## Legislation

- Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, Title VII, Part B ; U.S.C. 1138-1138d

## Regulations

- There are no program-specific regulations.
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) , 34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

FIPSE Home
#### 25.404 Least developed countries.

For acquisitions covered by the WTO GPA, least developed country end products, construction material, and services must be treated as eligible products.

[69 FR 77875, Dec. 28, 2004]
Publications

Appendix Table. Continued.

Go to next section of appendix.

Return to Table of Contents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Flava Works, Inc., )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:12-cv-05844

)

) 

)

)

John Doe Nos. 1 to 26, )

FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com, )

Earnwell Hong Kong LTD d/b/a Filesonic.com, )

Maxim Bochenko a/k/a Roman Romanov, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF MOTION

To: Defendants, Maxim Bochenko and FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com

2392 Sunset Bluff Drive

Jacksonville, Florida 32216

Please take notice that on October 31, 2012 at 9:15 a.m., I shall appear before 

the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman in the courtroom usually occupied by him in Room 1703 of 

the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, 219 South Dearborn Street, 

Chicago, Illinois, and shall then and there present Plaintiff=s Motion to Vacate Dismissal for 

Prosecution, a copy of which is served upon you.

Dated: October 24, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Meanith Huon

Meanith Huon

PO Box 441

Chicago, Illinois 60690

Phone: (312) 405-2789

E-mail: huon.meanith@gmail.com

IL ARDC. No.: 6230996

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 16 Filed: 10/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:716
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I caused to be served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice 

of Plaintiff=s Motion to Vacate by causing copies of same to be filed electronically and by 

serving Defendants, Maxim Bochenko and FF Magnat Limited d/b/a Oron.com

2392 Sunset Bluff Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32216, via U.S. Mail, by depositing same, postage 

prepaid, from a U.S. Post Office Box in Chicago, Illinois on October 25, 2012 before 5:00 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Meanith Huon

Meanith Huon

PO Box 441

Chicago, Illinois 60690

Phone: (312) 405-2789

E-mail: huon.meanith@gmail.com

IL ARDC. No.: 6230996

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 16 Filed: 10/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:717
{10422-002 NTC A0347941.DOC}

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

ERIC D. FREED, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a 

national banking association, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 Case No. 12-cv-01477 

 Honorable Judge Gary Feinerman 

 Magistrate Judge Sheila M. Finnegan 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiff, Eric D. Freed, appeals to the United States Circuit Court for Seventh Circuit 

Court of Appeals from the Order entered by the United States District Court (Dkt. No. 116) and 

explained in the District Court’s Memorandum Opinion (Docket No. 117), in which the District 

Court granted the Motions for Abstention Pursuant to the Colorado River Doctrine filed by 

Defendant, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and by Third-Party Defendants, Complex Litigation 

Group LLC, Paul M. Weiss, and Jamie E. Weiss, entered in this captioned action on June 13, 

2013. 

Dated: June 18, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 

ERIC D. FREED

s/ David B. Goodman 

 One of His Attorneys

David B. Goodman (ARDC #6201242) 

SHAW FISHMAN GLANTZ & TOWBIN LLC 

321 North Clark Street, Suite 800 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

(312) 541-0151 

Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 118 Filed: 06/18/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1992
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, David B. Goodman, an attorney, certify that on June 18, 2013, I electronically filed, on 

behalf of Plaintiff Eric D. Freed, the foregoing NOTICE OF APPEAL, with the Clerk of Court 

using the CM/ECF system, and that service of such filings was accomplished by U.S. Mail and 

CM/ECF notice to all attorneys of record.

s/ David B. Goodman 

CM/ECF Service List

The following is the list of attorneys who are currently on the list to receive e-mail 

notices for this case: 

Michael Renee Cedillos cedillosm@gtlaw.com 

Joseph L. Cohen jcohen@shawfishman.com 

Paul Joseph Ferak ferakp@gtlaw.com 

Paul Thaddeus Fox foxp@gtlaw.com 

David Benjamin Goodman dgoodman@shawfishman.com 

Jeffrey A. Leon jeff@complexlitgroup.com 

Debra Jeannine Tucker dtucker@thetuckerfirm.com 

Paul M. Weiss paul@complexlitgroup.com 

Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 118 Filed: 06/18/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1993
28.105-2 Patent infringement bonds. ( a ) Contracts providing for patent indemnity may require these bonds only if— ( 1 ) A performance bond is not furnished; and
( 2 ) The financial responsibility of the contractor is unknown or doubtful.
( b ) The contracting officer shall determine the penal sum.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,183,000                 121,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  569,000                 445,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,543,000               1,398,000
<PP&E>                                      34,713,000              32,354,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,000                  17,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,696,000              34,324,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,570,000               1,685,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,938,000               4,850,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,978,000              27,579,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,696,000              34,324,000
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,000                 202,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  438,000                 882,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               503,000                 332,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,000                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (589,000)             (1,012,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (589,000)             (1,012,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (589,000)             (1,012,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.69)                  (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.69)                  (1.25)







</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lewis R. Friedman, Appellant, v Commissioner of the New York City Department of Correction et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 13, 1978 dismissing petitioner-appellant’s writ of habeas corpus challenging extradition of Whitney Chase to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is reversed, on the law, and the writ is granted, without costs. Earlier we stayed execution of the extradition warrant to afford the Commonwealth an opportunity to specify the week when Chase is claimed to have committed the crime giving rise to the warrant. *(People ex rel. Friedman v Commissioner of N. Y. City Dept, of Correction,*66 AD2d 689.) *856Respondent District Attorney having reported that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is unable to so specify, the warrant of extradition must be vacated. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Fein, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
2811.002 Policy. ( a ) Consistent with the policy expressed in FAR 11.002(b), the metric system is the preferred system of weights and measures and shall be used in DOJ solicitations and contracts.
( b ) When acquiring products or services, the requirements of FAR 11.002(d)(1) and DOJ sustainability policies and procedures are to be followed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                       725
<INVENTORY>                                     62,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,432
<PP&E>                                         207,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,393
<BONDS>                                        144,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,575
<PREFERRED>                                     15,640
<COMMON>                                         5,967
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,887
<SALES>                                        212,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,285
<CGS>                                          146,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,290)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,905
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,305
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 362 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 362

 Recognizing the service of the Los Angeles-class attack submarine the 
 USS Jacksonville and the crew of the USS Jacksonville, who served the 
                 United States with valor and bravery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 20, 2017

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Nelson) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the service of the Los Angeles-class attack submarine the 
 USS Jacksonville and the crew of the USS Jacksonville, who served the 
                 United States with valor and bravery.

Whereas the USS Jacksonville (SSN 699) is named after Jacksonville, the largest 
        and most populous city in Florida, and is the first ship to bear that 
        name;
Whereas the slogan of the city of Jacksonville, Florida, is ``The Bold New City 
        of the South'' and inspired the nickname of the USS Jacksonville, which 
        is ``The Bold One'';
Whereas, on August 10, 2017, the USS Jacksonville returned to the home port of 
        the USS Jacksonville at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in the Western 
        Pacific after 209 days out to sea, thus completing the 15th and final 
        deployment of the USS Jacksonville;
Whereas, on the last deployment of the USS Jacksonville, the USS Jacksonville 
        steamed more than 48,000 nautical miles while conducting--

    (1) maritime security operations in the areas of operation of the Fifth 
Fleet and Seventh Fleet of the United States; and

    (2) joint exercises with the Maritime Self-Defense Force of Japan and 
the navy of the Republic of India;

Whereas, since the commissioning of the USS Jacksonville on May 16, 1981, the 
        USS Jacksonville has completed 2 around-the-world cruises, visited ports 
        on nearly every continent, and completed countless critical missions; 
        and
Whereas, on September 11, 2001, while the USS Jacksonville was attached to the 
        Enterprise Battle Group, the USS Jacksonville--

    (1) was in the Mediterranean Sea; and

    (2) stayed on-station to provide critical intelligence support as the 
United States prepared to retaliate in response to the terrorist attacks 
carried out on that day: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the service of the Los 
Angeles-class attack submarine the USS Jacksonville and the crew of the 
USS Jacksonville, who served the United States with valor and bravery.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 1:12-cv-05751 Document #: 131-12 Filed: 02/10/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2051
Case: 1:12-cv-05751 Document #: 131-12 Filed: 02/10/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2052
#### 2803.908-9 Contract clauses.
#### 2452.216-82 Labor categories, requirements, and estimated level of effort.

As prescribed in 2416.506-70(g), insert the following provision in all level-of-effort solicitations:

### LABOR CATEGORIES, REQUIREMENTS, AND ESTIMATED LEVEL OF EFFORT (APR 2019)

(a) The Government anticipates that the following categories of labor shall be necessary to provide the services required by any contract resulting from this solicitation. Offerors must provide evidence that proposed staff meet the technical requirements for each category.

(1) [Insert labor titles and technical requirements]

(b) To assist offerors in the preparation of proposals, the Government estimates that the following levels of effort (staff hours) will be necessary to provide the services required by any contract resulting from this solicitation. These estimates are not binding on the Government. Offerors must break out their proposed costs by labor category. The contract performance period is intended to be for a total of [ ] months (a base period of [ ] months with [ ] [insert number of options] [ ] [insert number of months per option]-month option periods. The actual duration of the base period may be different. Offerors may propose labor at different rates per contract period.

Staff Hours

| Labor category | Base period | 1st option period | 2nd option period | 3rd option period | 4th option period |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Insert titles and estimated number of hours per category] | | | | | |

(End of provision)

[[84 FR 15131](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-15131), Apr. 15, 2019]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                             OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,
being the duly elected and appointed chief executive officer and chief financial
officer of MPSI Systems Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), subject in
all respects to the principle of "materiality" that is inherent in financial
reporting under generally accepted accounting principles, and subject further to
knowledge actually in their possession at the date of this Certificate, hereby
certify that:

     1. the Company's annual report on Form 10-K as amended for the year ended
December 31, 2002, complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));

     2. the financial statements, including notes thereto and supplemental
information contained in various parts of such periodic report, fairly present,
in all material respects when considered in the context of the financial
statements taken as a whole, the financial condition, results of operations and
changes in cash flow of the Company for the indicated periods;


     Executed this 29th day of April, 2003.



                                        /s/ Ronald G. Harper
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Ronald G. Harper, Chief Executive Officer

                                        /s/  James C. Auten
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 James C. Auten, Chief Financial Officer
#### 252.227-7005 License term.

As prescribed at 227.7009-3(b), insert one of the following clauses in patent releases, license agreements, and assignments:

# License Term (OCT 2001)

*Alternate I* (AUG 1984). The license hereby granted shall remain in full force and effect for the full term of each of the patents referred to in the “License Grant” clause of this contract and any and all patents hereafter issued on applications for patent referred to in such “License Grant” clause.

*Alternate II* (OCT 2001). The license hereby granted shall terminate on the ________ day of ________ ,________; *Provided,* however, that said termination shall be without prejudice to the completion of any contract entered into by the Government prior to said date of termination or to the use or disposition thereafter of any articles or materials manufactured by or for the Government under this license.

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 66 FR 49861, Oct. 1, 2001]
#### 2452.215-72 Evaluation of small business participation.

As prescribed in 2415.370, insert the following provision:

# Evaluation Of Small Business Participation (DEC 2012)

(a) In addition to the technical and management evaluation factors set forth in this solicitation, the Government will evaluate the extent to which all offerors identify and commit to using small businesses in the performance of the contract, whether through joint ventures or teaming arrangements, or as subcontractors. The evaluation shall consider the following:

(1) The extent to which small businesses are specifically identified in proposals;

(2) The extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, enforceable commitments will be weighted more heavily than non-enforceable ones);

(3) The complexity and variety of the work small businesses are to perform;

(4) The realism of the proposal;

(5) Past performance of the offerors (other than small businesses) in complying with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan; and

(6) The extent of participation of small businesses in terms of the total value of the contract.

(b) Offerors that are required to submit a subcontracting plan pursuant to the clause at FAR 52.219-9 shall include the small businesses proposed as subcontractors for evaluation under this provision in their subcontracting plan.

(End of provision)

[77 FR 73533, Dec. 10, 2012]