alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017340EN.01000501.xml

| 11.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 October 2017

(2017/C 340/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1797 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4428 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89410 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5265 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1522 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,900 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2931 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5753 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,3385 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5155 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4745 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2067 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6688 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6001 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 336,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1484 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7609 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5035 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 912,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9783 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,728 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,2832 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,237 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7378 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,9090 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,9720 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1797

JPY

Japanese yen

132,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4428

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89410

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5265

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1522

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,900

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2931

RON

Romanian leu

4,5753

TRY

Turkish lira

4,3385

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5155

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4745

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2067

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6688

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6001

KRW

South Korean won

1 336,25

ZAR

South African rand

16,1484

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7609

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5035

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 912,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9783

PHP

Philippine peso

60,728

RUB

Russian rouble

68,2832

THB

Thai baht

39,237

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7378

MXN

Mexican peso

21,9090

INR

Indian rupee

76,9720

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**The "Frequently Asked Questions About Sexual Harassment, Including Sexual Violence" page has been revised and now resides on the "Frequently Asked Questions on Age Discrimination" page.**

**Please update any bookmarks to reflect this new location.**

**The page you are currently on will be removed from this site May 1, 2017.**
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex parte R.M.A., * From the 106th District Court

 of Dawson County,

 Trial Court No. 15-7496.

No. 11-22-00129-CV * July 13, 2023

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

 

 

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
(March 2, 1979)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Leon Greenberg for Reinstatement as an Attorney and Counselor at Law.

Application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law in good standing granted. Order entered. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Training Program for Federal TRIO Programs Staff

FY 2011 Grantees and Funding

PR Award 

Number Training Grantees State Training Priority

 Number of 

Staff to 

Receive 

Training 

 FY 2011 Funding 

(2011-12 Project Yr) 

P103A100008 Sonoma State University CA

Proven strategies for recruiting and serving 

hard to reach populations. 250 $ 337,454 

P103A100015 Council for Opportunity in Education DC

Student financial aid and college and university 

admissions policies and procedures. 250 $ 337,454 

P103A100016 Council for Opportunity in Education DC

Budget Management and the legislative and 

regulatory requirements for operation of the 

Federal TRIO programs.

 250 $ 337,454 

P103A100026

Southeastern Association of Educational 

Opportunity Program Personnel GA

Assessment of Student Needs; proven 

retention and graduation strategies; and the 

use of educational technology in order to 

design and operate a model TRIO project.

 250 $ 375,972 

P103A100030 Renaissance Education Group, Inc. NC

Proven strategies for recruiting and serving 

hard to reach populations. 250 $ 337,454 

P103A100010 University of Nevada/ Las Vegas NV

Record Keeping; reporting of student and 

project performance; and the evaluation of 

project performance in order to design and 

operate a model TRIO project.

 250 $ 375,972 

P103A100011 University of Nevada/ Las Vegas NV

Budget Management and the legislative and 

regulatory requirements for operation of the 

Federal TRIO programs.

 250 $ 337,454 

P103A100012 University of Nevada/ Las Vegas NV

Student financial aid and college and university 

admissions policies and procedures. 250 $ 337,454 
Training Program for Federal TRIO Programs Staff

FY 2011 Grantees and Funding

PR Award 

Number Training Grantees State Training Priority

 Number of 

Staff to 

Receive 

Training 

 FY 2011 Funding 

(2011-12 Project Yr) 

P103A100006 University of Washington WA

Record Keeping; reporting of student and 

project performance; and the evaluation of 

project performance in order to design and 

operate a model TRIO project.

 250 $ 375,972 

P103A100007 University of Washington WA

Assessment of Student Needs; proven 

retention and graduation strategies; and the 

use of educational technology in order to 

design and operate a model TRIO project.

 250 $ 375,972 

Total No. of Projects: 10 2,500 $ 3,528,612

Data as of November 2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ALAN VITULI                               
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

July 29, 2005
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

City of Philadelphia, :

:

v. :

:

Leslie Nelson, : No. 1479 C.D. 2021

Appellant :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of July, 2024, it is ORDERED that the 

above-captioned opinion filed May 9, 2024, shall be designated OPINION 

rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

________________________________

ANNE E. COVEY, Judge
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0678. SOLOMAN JACKSON v. THE STATE.

In 2009, Soloman Jackson pleaded guilty to burglary. He was sentenced,

pursuant to OCGA§ 17-10-7 (c), to twenty years’ imprisonment with thirteen and onehalf to serve in prison, with no possibility of parole. Jackson did not file a direct

appeal. In April 2016, Jackson filed a motion to correct a void sentence, arguing that

the prior convictions used to establish his status as recidivist had already been “used

up” in earlier proceedings for the same purpose, and thus, could not form the basis

for establishing recidivism in the instant case. He also contended that the State failed

to offer certified copies of his prior felony convictions. On June 7, 2016, the trial court

denied Jackson’s motion, and he filed a notice of appeal on June 17, 2016.

1 We,

however, lack jurisdiction.

A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to vacate

or correct a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the

sentence is, in fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 (1) n.1 (686 SE2d

786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A claim

that the State failed to prove the existence of a prior conviction by admissible evidence

may be waived and therefore does not present a colorable claim that an ensuing

enhanced sentence is void. von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572-573 (2) (748 SE2d

1 On October 13, 2006, Jackson filed an application for discretionary review

from the trial court’s June 7, 2016 order denying his motion to correct a void sentence.

We dismissed his application as untimely. See Case No. A17D0137 (decided

November 8, 2016).

November 30, 2017
446) (2013). Moreover, even assuming that Jackson was improperly sentenced as a

recidivist, a trial court is authorized to sentence a defendant to up to twenty years’

imprisonment for burglary regardless of whether the defendant is deemed a recidivist.

See OCGA § 16-7-1. Accordingly, Jackson’s twenty-year sentence is not more severe

than the law allows, and it is not void. See Brown v. State, 295 Ga. App. 66, 67-68

(670 SE2d 867) (2008).

Because Jackson has not raised a valid void-sentence claim, he is not entitled

to a direct appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/30/2017
# C_2016370EN.01000201.xml

| 8.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 October 2016

(2016/C 370/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1140 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4405 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90353 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6335 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0946 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0010 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,86 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2813 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5046 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3985 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4696 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4784 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6426 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5590 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5320 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 243,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4629 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4322 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5035 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 466,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6343 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,883 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,5692 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,890 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6087 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5602 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,3105 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1140

JPY

Japanese yen

115,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4405

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90353

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6335

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0946

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0010

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,86

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2813

RON

Romanian leu

4,5046

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3985

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4696

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4784

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6426

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5590

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5320

KRW

South Korean won

1 243,04

ZAR

South African rand

15,4629

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4322

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5035

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 466,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6343

PHP

Philippine peso

53,883

RUB

Russian rouble

69,5692

THB

Thai baht

38,890

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6087

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5602

INR

Indian rupee

74,3105

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 6, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40307

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MONTY MARCELLUS SHELTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-81-ALL-LED

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Monty Marcellus Shelton appeals his conviction and sentence

for one count of possession with intent to distribute 500 grams

or more of methamphetamine and for two counts of being a felon in

possession of a firearm while under indictment. 21 U.S.C. § 841;

18 U.S.C. § 922(n). He argues (1) that the evidence at trial was

insufficient to support his convictions, (2) that the testimony

of two police officers contained hearsay, in violation of his

rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, and
No. 04-40307

-2-

(3) that his sentence violates Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct.

2531 (2004). 

The evidence at trial was overwhelming. The Government

presented 12 witnesses, most of whom attested to Shelton’s

possession of large quantities of methamphetamine pills as well

as his activities as a dealer of methamphetamine. One witness

testified that Shelton was in possession of at least 30,000

methamphetamine pills. Another testified that approximately

5,000 methamphetamine pills were found in Shelton’s vehicle. 

Witnesses also attested to Shelton’s possession of the two

shotguns charged in counts two and three. This argument is

without merit. See United States v. Payne, 99 F.3d 1273, 1278

(5th Cir. 1996). 

Shelton’s argument that hearsay testimony was erroneously

admitted at trial fails. Any error in admitting the testimony

was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt. 

See United States v. Cantu, 167 F.3d 198, 203 (5th Cir. 1999). 

Shelton’s argument that his sentence is illegal under

Blakely is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v.

Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed

(U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263). 

AFFIRMED.
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Illinois

DeAndre Crawford )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 12 C 2251

Lieutenant Craig Johnson, et al.

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs.

the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

X other:

Judgment entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants Johnson, Wiggins, and Franko.

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

X decided by Judge Edmond E. Chang on a motion for summary

judgment. 

Date: Mar 4, 2013 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

/s/ Sandra Brooks

Case: 1:12-cv-02251 Document #: 40 Filed: 03/04/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:181
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 401 

Designating May 5, 2018 as the ‘‘National Day of Awareness for Missing 

and Murdered Native Women and Girls’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2018 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. UDALL, Mr. GARDNER, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. LANKFORD, Ms. 

WARREN, Mr. WYDEN, and Mrs. MURRAY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

APRIL 25, 2018 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 5, 2018 as the ‘‘National Day of Awareness 

for Missing and Murdered Native Women and Girls’’. 

Whereas, according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some tribal communities, American 

Indian women face murder rates that are more than 10 

times the national average murder rate; 

Whereas, according to the most recently available data from 

the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2015, 

homicide— 

(1) ranged from the second to seventh leading cause 

of death for American Indian and Alaska Native females 

between 1 and 39 years of age; and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 401 ATS 

(2) remained a leading cause of death for most 

American Indian and Alaska Native females between 40 

and 64 years of age; 

Whereas little data exist on the number of missing American 

Indian and Alaska Native women and girls in the United 

States; 

Whereas, on July 5, 2013, Hanna Harris, a member of the 

Northern Cheyenne Tribe, was reported missing by her 

family in Lame Deer, Montana; 

Whereas the body of Hanna Harris was found 5 days after 

she went missing; 

Whereas Hanna Harris was determined to have been raped 

and murdered, and the individuals accused of committing 

those crimes were convicted; 

Whereas the case of Hanna Harris is an example of many 

similar cases; and 

Whereas Hanna Harris was born on May 5, 1992: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 5, 2018, as the ‘‘National 

3 Day of Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native 

4 Women and Girls’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups— 

7 (A) to commemorate the lives of missing 

8 and murdered American Indian and Alaska Na9 tive women and girls whose cases are docuVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:00 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR401.ATS SR401

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 401 ATS 

1 mented and undocumented in public records 

2 and the media; and 

3 (B) to demonstrate solidarity with the fam4 ilies of the victims in light of those tragedies. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
June 11, 2015

Mr. Cole Nickell 3610 Hearthway Lane Cumming, GA 30041

Dear Mr. Nickell:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 26, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1907), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
- Indirect Cost Concerns Under the Uniform Guidance  (MS PowerPoint, 606KB)
- ED Indirect Cost Guidance
  Last Modified: 10/29/2015
<PAGE>



                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                        ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-40729) and to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-74601, 333-64989,
333-56677, 333-51903, 333-43595, 333-42375, 333-34743, 333-34699, 333-31265,
33-44115, 33-31819, 33-23504, 33-7499, 2-89925, 33-10106, 33-38044, 33-16987,
33-62603) of Compaq Computer Corporation of our report dated January 25,
2000, except as to Note 13, which is as of February 16, 2000, relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this
Form 10-K.




/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas
February 21, 2000