alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          42,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,421,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,215,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,866,722
<PP&E>                                       1,109,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,975,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,592,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    200,000
<COMMON>                                    19,114,871
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,174,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,975,789
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,180,029
<CGS>                                       12,033,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,033,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                304,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            304,437
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   304,437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,




As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) by Aspyra, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned
hereby certifies that to her knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and for
the periods presented in the Report.




Date:
April 10, 2009




/s/
      Anahita VillafaneAnahita
      Villafane, Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Aspyra, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
TYLON HUDSON,
Plaintiff,
Vv.

COUNTY OF COOK ILLINOIS, et al.,

Defendants.

TYLON HUDSON,
Plaintiff,
v. No. 12 C 5063

JOHN MUELLER, et al.,

Defendants.
MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appointed counsel Thomas Zimmerman, Jr. (“Zimmerman”) for
pro se plaintiff Tylon Hudson (“Hudson,” who had originally filed
his Complaint pro se) has filed, and this Court has today
granted, motions with supporting memoranda for leave to withdraw
as Hudson’s counsel in both of these cases. Those thoughtfully
prepared and comprehensive documents, as submitted by Zimmerman,
serve very much the same function as the well known Anders
motions and briefs in criminal cases.

Accordingly this Court will follow the same procedure that
is uniformly applied in such Anders-type situations by granting
Hudson (to whom a copy of this memorandum order is being

transmitted) until March 27, 2013 to submit any argument that in



his view negates the conclusion reached by Zimmerman “that
Hudson’s claims are wholly frivolous and without merit.” In the
absence of any timely response by Hudson, or alternatively if
this Court determines that Hudson has not effectively countered
the conclusion reached in counsel’s Anders-type submission, this

Court anticipates dismissing both of these lawsuits.

Milton I. Shadur
Senior United States District Judge

Date: March 6, 2013
# C_2018087EN.01000201.xml

| 7.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 March 2018

(2018/C 87/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2411 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4494 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89165 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1835 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1626 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 123,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6130 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,380 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,11 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1815 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6598 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,7013 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5840 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5993 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7218 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6985 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6325 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 316,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5449 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8538 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4275 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 030,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8322 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,360 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,8699 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,871 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9927 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1660 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,5845 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2411

JPY

Japanese yen

131,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4494

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89165

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1835

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1626

ISK

Iceland króna

123,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6130

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,380

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,11

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1815

RON

Romanian leu

4,6598

TRY

Turkish lira

4,7013

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5840

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5993

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7218

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6985

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6325

KRW

South Korean won

1 316,92

ZAR

South African rand

14,5449

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8538

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4275

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 030,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8322

PHP

Philippine peso

64,360

RUB

Russian rouble

69,8699

THB

Thai baht

38,871

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9927

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1660

INR

Indian rupee

80,5845

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2018088EN.01001901.xml

| 8.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/19

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2018/C 88/08)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

| | EPSO/AD/356/18 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/356/18 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 5)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 88 A of 8 March 2018.

Official Journal of the European Union

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/

---
Case: 1:12-cv-05300 Document #: 4 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:25
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

AUTOMATED FACILITIES )

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No.

)

IFS NORTH AMERICA, INC., )

)

Defendant )

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF

PLAINTIFF AUTOMATED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

Plaintiff Automated Facilities Management Corporation, pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby discloses its corporate parents.

Automated Facilities Management Corporation is owned by Acacia Research Group 

LLC, which in turn is owned by the publicly traded corporation Acacia Research Corporation.

Date: March 30, 2012 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ Michael Kanovitz_____________

Michael Kanovitz

Vincenzo Field

LOEVY & LOEVY

312 North May Street

Suite 100

Chicago, IL 60607

Ph: (312) 243-5900

Fx: (312) 243-5902

Case: 1:12-cv-02408 Document #: 3 Filed: 03/30/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:6
Robert M. Shore

Motley Rice LLP

1100 Glendon Avenue

14th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90024-3503

Ph: (310) 500-3543

Fx: (310) 824-2870

Case: 1:12-cv-02408 Document #: 3 Filed: 03/30/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:7
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (21-008)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

 In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Planetary Science Advisory Committee. The meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting, from the scientific community and other persons, scientific and technical information relevant to program planning.

# DATES:

Monday, March 1, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Eastern Time; and Tuesday, March 2, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Eastern Time.

# ADDRESSES:

Virtual meeting via WebEx and dial-in teleconference only.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Karshelia Henderson, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-2355 or                         *khenderson@nasa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    As noted above, this meeting will be available to the public telephonically and by WebEx only. The meeting event for attendees is:                     *https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/​nasaenterprise/​j.php?​MTID=​m1aafd71607930a725986be629a61990e.*                     The event meeting number is 199 538 6929 and the password is PAC_March2021. For audio, when joining the Webex event, you may use your computer or provide your phone number to receive a call back. Otherwise, call the U.S. toll conference number: 1-415-527-5035 and enter the access code 199 538 6929.                

The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

—Planetary Science Division Update

—Planetary Science Division Research and Analysis Program Update

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Patricia Rausch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2021-02159 Filed 2-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
**EXHIBIT
      32**











**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Chattem,
      Inc., a Tennessee corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such
      officer’s knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the quarter ended February 28, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Company.


Date:
                  April 2, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Zan
                GuerryZan
                GuerryChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer 
 Date:
                    April 2,
                    2007
                By:
                /s/ Robert
                  E.
                  BosworthRobert
                  E.
                  BosworthPrincipal
                  Financial Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being
      furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q, or as a separate
      disclosure
      document.





A
      SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN
      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CHATTEM, INC. AND WILL
      BE
      RETAINED BY CHATTEM, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
      COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Clerk of Court

United States District Court for the Northern District of lllinois lg|0 Stp l0 fiH 9: lrb

Dirksen United States Courthouse

219 South Dearborn St.

Chicago, lL 60604

Re; Chervat V Resort Marketing Group CL#:62132045501

Dear Sir or Madam:

I am writing to find, hopefully, with your help, the outcome, insofar as those named/qualified

in this class action suit.

After establishing a person named, qualified as being adversely affected, after going through all

informational demands and compliance - all is silent.

ln the least I hope everyone in my position has not been taken fora ride, which I understand is

more the typical scenario, I believe. As I have had a few product headaches in my life that fit

the same situation, only to be forgotten and never heard from, again.

Well, l'm not going to take it anymore. After this, I will never answer another class action

query. I will not help to make the case!

I hope you will shed some light for me and perhaps please give me a true way of contact

for those with the true answers, in the above named suit.

Thank You Sincerely,

Shelia Henderson

6925 Bannister Rd.

Cumming, GA 30028

sEP 1 0 201s

THOMAS O, BRUTON

GLERK U.S, DISTRISI COURT

tn

FI LE

Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 725 Filed: 09/10/19 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:24020
|   | • |   | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|---------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |   |                                                                |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |  /s/ James Traicoff                                            |
|   |   |   |   |                                                                |
|   |   |   | Name:  | James Traicoff                                                      |
|   |   |   | Title: | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|   |   |   | Date:  | December 1, 2011                                                    |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

MELINDA CHARLES,1

Petitioner Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

BRIAN CHARLES, 

Respondent Below, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ 

§ No. 318, 2019 

§ 

§ Court Below—Family Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ File No. CK11-02876 

§ Petition Nos. 19-18751 and 

§ 19-18972 

§ 

 Submitted: August 1, 2019

 Decided: August 8, 2019 

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

ORDER 

After consideration of the response to the notice to show cause, it appears to 

the Court that: 

(1) On July 23, 2019, the appellant, Melinda Charles (“the Mother”) filed 

a notice of appeal from two Family Court orders, dated July 22, 2019, denying her 

motions for emergency ex parte orders in her petitions for visitation and custody. 

The Family Court referred the Mother’s allegations to the Division of Family 

Services for investigation. The petitions for visitation and custody remain pending 

in the Family Court. 

 

1

 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). 
2

(2) The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing the Mother to show 

cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for her failure to comply with 

Supreme Court Rule 42 in taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. In her 

response to the notice to show cause, the Mother argues the merits of her appeal, but 

does not address the interlocutory nature of the appeal. 

(3) An order constitutes a final judgment when it leaves nothing for future 

determination or consideration.2

 The Family Court orders denying the Mother’s 

motions for emergency ex parte orders are interlocutory because the Family Court 

did not finally resolve the merits of the Mother’s petitions for visitation and custody. 

Absent compliance with Rule 42, the appellate jurisdiction of this Court is limited 

to review of final trial court orders.3

 The Mother’s non-compliance with Rule 42 

leaves this Court without jurisdiction to hear her interlocutory appeal. The Mother 

may appeal once the Family Court issues final orders in the custody and visitation 

proceedings. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), 

that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

Justice 

 

2 Werb v. D'Alessandro, 606 A.2d 117, 119 (Del. 1992). 

3 Julian v. State, 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982).
# C_2017105EN.01000101.xml

| 4.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8159 — ArcelorMittal/Cellino/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 105/01)

On 27 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8159. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8159. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
3.907-3 Procedures for filing complaints. ( a ) An employee who believes that he or she has been subjected to reprisal prohibited by the Recovery Act, Section 1553 as set forth in 3.907-2, may submit a complaint regarding the reprisal to the Inspector General of the agency that awarded the contract.
( b ) The complaint shall be signed and shall contain— ( 1 ) The name of the contractor;
( 2 ) The contract number, if known; if not, a description reasonably sufficient to identify the contract(s) involved;
( 3 ) The covered information giving rise to the disclosure;
( 4 ) The nature of the disclosure giving rise to the discriminatory act; and
( 5 ) The specific nature and date of the reprisal.
( c ) A contracting officer who receives a complaint of reprisal of the type described in 3.907-2 shall forward it to the Office of Inspector General and to other designated officials in accordance with agency procedures (*e.g.*, agency legal counsel).
[74 FR 14634, Mar. 31, 2009, as amended at 75 FR 34259, June 16, 2010]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of the
Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, I,
David F. White, Controller of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.


                                        /S/ David F. White
                                        Controller (chief financial officer
                                         and principal accounting officer)