alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
10.48


    


    100%
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


    


    This 100%
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) dated this
12th
day of October 2009, is entered into by and between Dot VN, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Maker”) and Lee Johnson (the
“Holder”).

    


    Recitals

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              A.

            	
                    
                      
                  Maker
      made, executed and delivered to the order of Holder that certain 100%
      Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated April 20, 2009, in the
      principal sum of $2,884,658.16
      with interest payable at the rate of 8% per annum, which Note is
      due and payable on October 16, 2009 (the “Due
      Date”).

                

              

            
	 	 	 
	 	B.	      
                    
                Make
      and Holder on October 12, 2009 extended the Due Date of the Note to
      December 31, 2009 (“First Extended Due
      Date”).

              

            
	 	 	 
	 	C.	      
                    
                Maker
      and Holder desire to modify the terms of the Note to extend the First
      Extended Due
Date.

              

            


    

     

    NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and
for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

    


    Agreement

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              The
      First Extended Due Date of the Note is extended to December 31, 2009, at
      which time the entire amount of principal plus accrued interest shall be
      due and payable in full.

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              Except
      as provided herein, the terms and provisions of the Note shall remain
      unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect; the Note as modified
      and amended hereby is ratified and confirmed in all
    respects.

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.

            	
              The
      terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
      of the parties hereto, their heirs, representatives, successors and
      assigns

            


    

    


    IN
WITHNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is effective as of the date first above
written.

     

    
      	
              “MAKER”

              Dot VN, Inc.

            	 	 	
              “HOLDER”

              Lee Johnson

            	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
              /s/
      Thomas Johnson 

            	 	 	
              /s/
      Lee Johnson

            	 
	
              By:         Thomas
      Johnson 

            	 	 	
              By:         Lee
      Johnson

            	 
	
                    
                Its:         CEO
#### 252.239-7013 Term of Agreement and Continuation of Services.

*Basic.* As prescribed in 239.7411(c)(1), use the following clause:

# Term of Agreement and Continuation of Services—Basic (OCT 2019

(a) This basic agreement is not a contract. The Government incurs liability only upon issuance of a communication service authorization, which is a contract that incorporates the terms and conditions of this basic agreement.

(b) This agreement shall continue in force from year to year, unless terminated by either party by 30 days' written notice. Termination of this basic agreement does not terminate or cancel any communication service authorizations issued under this basic agreement prior to the termination.

(c) Communication service authorizations issued under this basic agreement may be modified to incorporate the terms and conditions of a new basic agreement negotiated with the Contractor.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I.* As prescribed in 239.7411(c)(2), use the following clause, which uses a different paragraph (c) than the basic clause and adds a new paragraph (d).

# Term of Agreement and Continuation of Services—Alternate I (OCT 2019)

(a) This basic agreement is not a contract. The Government incurs liability only upon issuance of a communication service authorization, which is a contract that incorporates the terms and conditions of this basic agreement.

(b) This agreement shall continue in force from year to year, unless terminated by either party by 30 days' written notice. Termination of this basic agreement does not terminate or cancel any communication service authorizations issued under this basic agreement prior to the termination.

(c) The Contractor's current communication services authorizations have been modified to incorporate the terms and conditions of this basic agreement.

(1) All current communication service authorizations issued by ________ that incorporate Basic Agreement Number ________, dated ________, are modified to incorporate this basic agreement.

(2) Current communication service authorizations, issued by the activity in paragraph (c)(1) of this clause, that incorporate other agreements with the Contractor may also be modified to incorporate this basic agreement.

(d) Communication service authorizations issued under this basic agreement may be modified to incorporate a new basic agreement with the Contractor.

(End of clause)

[84 FR 58338, Oct. 31, 2019]
2850

2800

2800

2800

2850

2800

2800

2750

2800

2900

2850

2900

2800

2850

2800

2800

2800

2800

2800

2900

2850

2750

2900

2800

2850

2800

2850

2850

2850

2850

2850

2750

2850

2900

2850

2800

2900

2850

2800

2900

2850

2750

2800

2850

2800

2850

2800

2850

2800

2850

G

OVE 32

G

OVE 38

OP216

G

OVE 32

G

OVE 38

OP216

Spring Brook

Creek

Spring

Brook

Creek

Saline River

Saline

River

Saline River

North

Fork

Big Creek

Spring

Brook

Creek

Grinnell

43

33

43

34

43

35

43

36

43

37

43

38

43

39

43

40

43

41

43

42

43

43

43

44

43

32

43

45000mN

43

33

43

34

43

35

43

36

43

37

43

38

43

39

43

40

43

42

43

43

43

44

43

32000mN

43

45

3

61 3

62 363 364 365 366 367 368 3

69 360

3

61 362 363 3

64 365 366 3

68 369 3

60000mE 3

70

570 000FEET

600 000FEET

300000

340 000

FEET

FEET

10'

12'30"

10'

35'

100°37'30" 35' 32'30"

100°37'30"

39°15' 39°15'

100°30'

100°30'

39°07'30" 39°07'30" 3

70000m

E

12'30"

32'30"

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

GRINNELL NE, KS

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

GRINNELL NE QUADRANGLE

KANSAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14S

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, July 2008

Roads..............National Transportation Dataset, 2005 - 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2006

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Kansas Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 59 ́

18 MILS

6° 30 ́

116 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14S

LJ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Grinnell

South Grainfield

Hoxie

Midway

Draw West

Grinnell

North

Seguin

Sunny

Slope Lake

Grinnell NE

Menlo

KANSAS
#### 246.470 Government contract quality assurance actions.
Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 12 Filed: 10/11/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:168
Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 12 Filed: 10/11/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:169
Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 12 Filed: 10/11/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:170
Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 12 Filed: 10/11/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:171
Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 12 Filed: 10/11/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:172
Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 12 Filed: 10/11/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:173
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.13


June 1, 1999

Dennis H. Nelson, President  & CEO
The Buckle, Inc.
2407 West 24th Street
P.O. Box 1480
Kearney, NE  68848-1480

Dear Dennis:

Our bank is pleased to issue a renewal loan commitment to your Company effective
on the expiration of our existing loan commitment on May 31, 1999. The purpose
of this loan commitment is to provide your Company with the funds for your
financing needs required for this operating year, subject to the following terms
and conditions:

      1)    An unsecured operating line of credit in the amount of $5,000,000.00
            available for your use until the loan expiration date of May 31,
            2000, at which time it will be subject to annual renewal, as has
            been the case in previous years.

      2)    The interest rate charged on the unsecured operating line of credit
            will be the National Prime Rate as published in the "Wall Street
            Journal" date of change. Interest will be billed and payable monthly
            on the unsecured line of credit.

      3)    A $5,000,000.00 irrevocable commercial letter of credit line.

      4)    The Company agrees to provide the bank with quarterly financial
            statements consisting of a balance sheet and income statement, and
            to provide the bank with an annual fiscal year- end audited
            financial statement.

Congratulations on your outstanding financial performance in both growth and
profitability this past year. We appreciate this opportunity to be able to
assist your fine Company with this financing package in support of your growth
objectives. If the terms and conditions of this loan commitment are satisfactory
to you, please acknowledge your acceptance by signing the following
Acknowledgment and returning it to my attention in the postage-paid return
envelope I have provided for your convenience.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely yours,

LARRY L. JEPSON

Larry L. Jepson
Chairman & CEO

                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The Undersigned acknowledges and accepts this loan commitment with attendant
terms and conditions as stated, this 1st day of June, 1999.

         THE BUCKLE, INC.

BY:  DENNIS NELSON, PRESIDENT & CEO                  June 1, 1999
     ------------------------------                  ------------
     Dennis Nelson, President & CEO                      Date



                                       30
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 45 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 45

  Condemning the deadly attack on May 26, 2017, in Portland, Oregon, 
   expressing deepest condolences to the families and friends of the 
   victims, and supporting efforts to overcome hatred, bigotry, and 
                               violence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2017

Mr. Wyden (for himself and Mr. Merkley) introduced the following joint 
resolution; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and 
                                 passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Condemning the deadly attack on May 26, 2017, in Portland, Oregon, 
   expressing deepest condolences to the families and friends of the 
   victims, and supporting efforts to overcome hatred, bigotry, and 
                               violence.

Whereas, on May 26, 2017, 3 brave community members--Rick Best, Taliesin Myrddin 
        Namkai-Meche, and Micah David-Cole Fletcher--were stabbed as they 
        protected 2 young women who were the targets of threatening anti-Muslim 
        hate speech while riding on the Metropolitan Area Express Light Rail 
        (commonly known as the ``MAX'') in Portland, Oregon;
Whereas Rick Best and Taliesin Myrddin Namkai-Meche lost their lives and Micah 
        David-Cole Fletcher was gravely injured as a result of the attack;
Whereas acts of heroism and sacrifice for the safety and sake of others in the 
        face of acts of domestic terrorism were demonstrated by the deceased and 
        surviving victims;
Whereas Oregonians and people across the United States grieve for the families 
        of all people affected by this needless tragedy; and
Whereas the people of the United States stand in solidarity against terrorism, 
        white supremacy, hate, and intolerance: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress--
            (1) condemns the deadly attack on May 26, 2017, in 
        Portland, Oregon, in which 2 innocent people were killed and 1 
        other person was injured while standing up to hate and 
        intolerance;
            (2) offers deepest condolences to the families and friends 
        of Rick Best and Taliesin Myrddin Namkai-Meche;
            (3) expresses hope for the swift and complete recovery of 
        Micah David-Cole Fletcher;
            (4) supports community efforts to heal from this terrible 
        crime; and
            (5) supports nationwide efforts to overcome hatred, 
        bigotry, and violence.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Dennis Herwig, Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board filed November 25, 1977, which affirmed a decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective June 22, 1977 because he lost his employment through misconduct in connection therewith. Claimant worked for his employer, a hospital, as a radiology technician from August 14, 1974 to June 22, 1977 when he was discharged for refusal to sign or accept a written warning in regard to his conduct. Claimant had admittedly received several prior verbal warnings, at least one of which was written and on which he had written a comment concerning his conduct. The employer’s witness testified that claimant gave no reason for his refusal to sign the warning notice. The board, therefore, could properly reject claimant’s contention that he gave a reason for his refusal. Furthermore, there was evidence that claimant refused to work weekends, then became insolent to his supervisor and finally refused to accept the written warning with knowledge that to do so could result in the loss of his employment. The refusal was the last act in a continuum of related events concerning his conduct which led to his discharge. The determination of whether a claimant lost his employment through misconduct is a factual one for the board *(Matter of McGlynn [Levine],*52 AD2d 709; *Matter of Markovic [Levine],*50 AD2d 1031). The board, in determining this question, may rely upon the entire course of conduct of the claimant leading up to the final act precipitating his termination *(Matter of Brooks [Levine],*38 NY2d 965; *Matter of Morgen [CBS, Inc.—Ross],*54 AD2d 523, 525). The decision of the board is supported by substantial evidence and we must, therefore, affirm. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis Manuel FLORES-AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50744

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Manuel Flores-Avila raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Corn Hill Landing, L.L.C., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 111324.)

[832 NYS2d 833]

Motion *1287Motion granted, appeal and cross appeal dismissed without costs as moot, order vacated and action dismissed. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith, Centra and Peradotto, JJ.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
## THE ATTO~CNEY GENERAL 0~ TEXAS
**Au- 1%.** **Texas**
March 26, 1962

Hon. Harold Hollingeworth Opinion No. WW-1283 CountyAttorney Kaufman .C~ounty Re: WhetherArticle 286a of Kaufman, Texas Vernon's Penal Code applies to the sale of mobile homes. Dear Mr. Hollingsworth:

In your recent letter you request an opinion as to whether Article 286a of Vernon's Penal Code prohibits the sale of mobile homes (house trailers).

Article 286a provides in part as follows: "Section1. Any person, on both the two (2) consecutivedays of Saturdayand Sunday, who aells or offers for sale or shell compel, force,or oblige his employees to sell any ... motor vehicles;

... shall be guilty o$ a misdemeanor. Each separate sale shall constitutea separateoffense." The prohibitionof the Act includes "motor vehicles." It does not cover mobile homes or house trailers. A motor vehicleby definition is a self-propelled vehicle. Article 67Olh, Section 1, Subdivision3, Vernon's Civil Statutes; Article 6675a-1, Section (b),Vernon's Civil Statutes; PrudentialInsuranceCompany of Great Britain ,v. Associated P. Lloyds 250 SW2d 477~ 479 480 (Ci

36-1, A Article 14 Section 1: Veion's Pen% C% 19521 Compare wheri for the purpose of the Motor Vehicle Certificateo$ Tltle'Act, the term "motor vehicle" includes "house trailers." Inasmuch as mobile homes or house trailersare not self-propelled they are notincluded In the Items which cannotbe **sold** under the prohibitLoon

of Article 286a, V.P.C. However,we call your attentionto Article 286, V.P.,C. which provides that:

'*Any merchant, grocer, or dealer in nmres or merchandiseor traders in any businesswhatsoever,
. .. or the agent or employee sell, barter person,who shall

.. . on Sunday shall be fined not han Twenty or more than Fifty Dollars."Hon. Harold Hollingsworth Page 2 OpinionNo. WW-1283

The constitutionality of these Sunday laws has been upheld. Gabel v. Houston, 29 Tex. 336 (1867) Bohl v. State, 3 Cr‘im.

Reports, 683; Usener v. State,8 Ers Reports 177; Ex Parte Sundetrom,-83!! 207 Whitcomb v. State, 17 S!?-258 LJ? [T ex. App. 18881, ,' SW 642 (T ex. App. 1891, Todd v. State, 6, A p. (Tex: Crg: 1 59).

B 1892);'andClark v. State, 319 .%?d It is thereforeour opinion that whereas Article 286a does not prohibitthe sale of mobile homes or house trailerson either of the two consecutive days of Saturday and Sunday, hibit such sales on Sunday. Article 286, V.P.C.,doesproSUMMARY Article 286a, Vernon's Penal Code, does not prohibitthe sale on both the consecutive days of Saturday and Sunday of mobile homes or house trailers. Article 286, V.P.C., does prevent the sale of mobile homes or house trailers on Sunday. Yours very truly,

NVS:bjb APPROVED: 

# yAfii?Lr~4

Assistan;AttorneyGeneral

OPINION COMMITTEE: W; V. Gap ert, Chairman IrwinR. z

almanson Iola Wilcox W. 0. Shultz REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEYGENERAL BY: HoughtonBrownlee,Jr.
EXHIBIT 4.7

                            ALLONGE AND AMENDMENT
                                     to
                     SERIES C WARRANTS OF ELXSI CORPORATION
                     --------------------------------------


        THIS ALLONGE AND AMENDMENT (this "instrument") to the Series C Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock of ELXSI Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), described hereinbelow (the "Subject Warrants Agreement"; and the
warrants evidenced thereby, the "Subject Warrants") is being executed by the
Company and the current holder (the "Holder") of the Subject Warrants, with the
intention and understanding that: (1) the amendments set forth herein shall be
binding upon the Company, the Holder and their respective successors and assigns
(including, without limitation, subsequent holders of the Subject Warrants); and
(2) this instrument shall be attached to, and form a part of, the Subject
Warrants Agreement or, in lieu thereof, that the amendments of the Subject
Warrants provided for herein shall be incorporated in any new Subject Warrants
Agreement that may be issued at a future date (including upon any transfer of
the Subject Warrants).

        FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, and intending to be legally
bound, it is hereby agreed as follows:

        1. Increase in of Exercise Price.  With the intention of increasing the
current exercise price of the Subject Warrants from $4.36 per share to $5.23 per
share, the Subject Warrant Agreement is hereby amended by: (A) deleting the
"$4.36" where it appears in the initial paragraph thereof; and (B) inserting, in
lieu thereof, "$5.23".

        2. Extension of Expiration Date.  With the intention of extending the
expiration date of the Subject Warrants by two years, the Subject Warrant
Agreement is hereby amended by: (A) deleting the "January 31, 1997" where it
appears in the definition of "Expiration Date" therein and; and (B) inserting,
in lieu thereof, the "January 31, 1999".

        3. Miscellaneous.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Subject
Warrants Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the
terms thereof. This instrument shall be governed by the laws of the State of New
York, without regard to the provisions thereof relating to conflict of laws.

Dated:                       , 1997         Subject Warrants:
       ----------------------               ----------------

                                            Cert. No.:       C-3
                                            Dated:           8/1/95
                                            No. Warrants:    68,762

Agreed and Accepted:

The Company:                                The Holder:
-----------                                 ----------

ELXSI Corporation                           Eliot Kirkland L.L.C.


By:                                          By:
   -----------------------------                ----------------------------
   Name:                                        Name:
   Title:                                       Title:

<PAGE>