alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Jeffrey Satterfield, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05704

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Lime Energy Co., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, January 28, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Preliminary Approval hearing

held on 1/28/2014. Lead Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class

action settlement and notice to the settlement class [88] is granted. Plaintiffs to submit

order for preliminary approval to Judge Ellis' proposed order email inbox by close of

business, 1/28/2014. Opt−out date is set for 4/29/2014. Plaintiffs to submit attorneys fees

petition by 4/13/2014. Final Approval hearing set for 5/13/2014 at 12:30 PM. Mailed

notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05704 Document #: 95 Filed: 01/28/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:898
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2018, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2019 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |

|                              |
|------------------------------|
|                              |  |  |
|                         |   |   |
| Date:  February 5, 2019 | By: | /s/ Bowen S. Diehl |
|                         |   | Bowen S. Diehl |
|                         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

ational Bureau of Standards

Washington, D.C. 20234

NBS Misc. Publ. 259*

Issued June 26, 1964

Price 5 cents

SELECTION OF CAMERA FILTERS FOR COLOR PHOTOGRAPHY

One of the problems facing the serious color photographer—whether he is a hobbyist or

, scientist trying to record accurately some physical phenomenon—is matching his color film o the light he is using to take the picture.

Color films are usually balanced for a particular kind of light, classified as "daylight,"

'flash/' "3200 °K," or "photoflood." When a film is used in light with a different color

mlance, filters are used over the camera lens to bring the combination back into agreement.

This chart provides a quick and easy way to select the right filter for almost any combination

)f light source and color film. A straightedge laid across the three scales so that it connects

-he light source and the color film will cross the center line at a point corresponding to the

)roper filter. Notations consisting of a series of filter designations (e.g., 80b+82c+82a)

nean that all these filters should be used at once for proper correction. When color correcting

liters are used, the exposure must be increased by the "filter factor" assigned by the filter nanufacturer.

The chart was prepared by C. S. McCamy of the NBS Photographic Research Section.

ANOTHER NBS PUBLICATION OF INTEREST TO PHOTOGRAPHERS

Method for Determining the Resolving Power of Lenses (NBS Circular 533) provides the photographer with two sets of charts by which the resolving power of a photographic lens may be numerically measured. The accompanying booklet gives a

detailed description of the procedure and technique to be followed in order that comparable values may be obtained by different observers. Additional uses of these charts are also described, including the testing of goggle lenses for definition and prismatic power, and the testing of telescopes and binoculars for definition. NBS Circular 533,* Method for Determining the Resolving Power of Photographic Lenses, by Washer and Gardner, $1.75 (add one-fourth for foreign mailing).

*For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 20402 5 cents
3 » a 0 ? o O

O

O

O

O o 2 ^ c

3' 5 a 3 g O o ooro

3)T|I-HmXOo>X I I [ I 1 I I I I I I I por

rx > o r 1

t,

m

H

-V1 n h 0 -<

01m

O > 0 w

JL

n

H

O -c aj -a I O

>7 1 « > in
242.1106 Reporting requirements. ( a ) See DoDI 5000.2, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, for reporting requirements for defense technology projects and acquisition programs.
( b ) ( i ) Within four working days after receipt of the contractor's report, the CAO must provide the report and any required comments to the contracting officer and, unless otherwise specified in the contract, the inventory control manager.
( ii ) If the contractor's report indicates that the contract is on schedule and the CAO agrees, the CAO does not need to add further comments. In all other cases, the CAO must add comments and recommend a course of action.
[65 FR 39723, June 27, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 14575, Mar. 23, 2005; 73 FR 21848, Apr. 23, 2008]
# C_2016398EN.01000102.xml

| 28.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8164 — Steinhoff International/Pikolin/Cofe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 398/02)

On 21 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8164. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8164. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 2805.500 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides policies and procedures for the procurement of paid advertising as covered by 44 U.S.C. 3702 and 3703 and 5 U.S.C. 302(b).
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 202 Filed: 07/22/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:3600
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 202 Filed: 07/22/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:3601
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 202 Filed: 07/22/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:3602
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 202 Filed: 07/22/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:3603
237.7200 Scope. ( a ) This subpart prescribes acquisition procedures for educational services from schools, colleges, universities, or other educational institutions. This subpart does not include tuition assistance agreements, i.e., payment by the Government of partial tuition under the off-duty educational program.
( b ) As used in the subpart— ( 1 ) “ Facilities ” do not include the institution's dining rooms or dormitories; and
( 2 ) “ Fees ” does not include charges for meals or lodging.
#### 2436.602-5 Short selection processes for contracts not to exceed the small purchase limitation.

The short selection process described in FAR 36.602-5(a) is authorized for use for contracts not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

[49 FR 7708, Mar. 1, 1984; 49 FR 10930, Mar. 23, 1984, as amended at 57 FR 59791, Dec. 15, 1992; 64 FR 46098, Aug. 23, 1999]
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0824

DCN CBM00757 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
2014 Preschool Development Grants

 

- FY 2014 Preschool Development Grants Awards
- Preschool Development Grants Fact Sheet  [PDF, 849K]
- States That Submitted Applications for FY14 Preschool Development Grants  [ PDF , 21K]
- Grant Application Submission Information
- States Submitting Notices of Intent to Apply  [ PDF , 102K]

### Development Grants

- 2014 Notice Inviting  Applications  |   PDF  (435K)
- Application for Initial  Funding
- 2014 Executive Summary 
- 2014 Excel Spreadsheets  (Budget  Worksheets & Tables) 

### Expansion Grants

- 2014 Notice Inviting Applications    |   PDF  (435K)
- 2014 Application for Initial  Funding
- 2014 Executive Summary 
- 2014 Excel Spreadsheets  (Budget  Worksheets & Tables) 

Timeline

 

**Application  available:** August 13, 2014**Webinar for  potential applicants:** August 20, 2014**Technical  Assistance Planning Workshop:**

- Development Grants: August 25, 2014
- Expansion Grants: August 26, 2014

**Deadline for  transmitting applications:** October 24, 2014**Awards announced  by:** December  31, 2014
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00281-CV

In re Patricia Lux Graham

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In this original proceeding, relator Patricia Lux Graham filed a petition for writ of

mandamus seeking relief from a temporary restraining order signed by the district court on May 1,

2014 (the TRO), along with an emergency motion to stay the TRO pending our disposition of

her mandamus petition. We granted the emergency stay. In the interim, the TRO has expired by

its own terms and was not continued either by the parties’ agreement or court order, nor has

any temporary injunction been issued. Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding as moot without

reaching the merits. Similarly, we express no opinion regarding the merits of the real-party-ininterest’s underlying claims or of Graham’s defenses, which remain pending in the trial court and

can be developed more fully through further proceedings there. 

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Filed: May 27, 2014
#### Boston Khan v. Mary Engel et al.

Application denied, with $10 costs. The stay contained in the order to show cause, dated January 6, 1961, is continued for a period of 30 days from the service upon the attorney for the tenants of a copy of the order filed herein, with notice of entry thereof. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,463
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     95,222
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,460
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,717
<LOANS>                                        208,713
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,954
<DEPOSITS>                                     254,244
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,952
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,227
<LONG-TERM>                                     29,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,505
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 341,954
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,984
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,933
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    11
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,928
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,845
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,083
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,975
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,975
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.24
<LOANS-NON>                                        893
<LOANS-PAST>                                       273
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    329
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,209
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      547
<RECOVERIES>                                       229
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,071
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               991
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,080
        

</TABLE>
2832.402 General. ( a ) The authority to make the determinations prescribed in FAR 32.402 and sign written determinations and findings with respect to making advance payments is vested in the HCA or designee.
( b ) Prior to awarding a contract which contains provisions for making advanced payments, the contract terms and conditions concerning advance payments shall be approved at a level above the contracting officer.
( c ) In ensuring that all FAR and agency requirements are met, the contracting officer shall coordinate with the activity that is to provide contract financing for advance payments, the bureau's disbursing or finance office, or the Treasury Department, as appropriate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Abdel-Ghaffar,

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 

Defendant(s).

Case No. 12-cv-05812 

Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

ORDER

Kamron Memon's Motion to Withdraw [91] is denied without prejudice. The motion hearing 

noticed for 8/19/14 is stricken with no appearance necessary. Plaintiff's counsel promptly 

shall provide a copy of this order to Plaintiff. See Statement below for further details. 

STATEMENT

 Counsel bears the burden of showing he or she should be allowed to withdraw as the 

attorney of record for a client. Stafford v. Mesnick, 63 F.3d 1445, 1448 (7th Cir. 1995); Woodall 

v. The Drake Hotel, 913 F.2d 447, 449 (7th Cir. 1990); Smith v. City of Milwaukee, 2012 WL

3240339 (E.D. Wis. Aug. 7, 2012). An attorney seeking leave to withdraw as counsel of record

must establish either that his client consents or that a valid and compelling reason exists to 

allow the court to grant the motion over an objection. Id. 

 Counsel avers in his motion only that "[i]reconcilable differences have developed between 

Plaintiff and Kamron Memon." [DE#91 at 1.] This is the sort of boilerplate recitation that has 

been held to be insufficient to support a lawyer’s motion to withdraw from representing a 

client he previously agreed to represent, and has been actively representing, in a pending case. 

See, e.g., Smith v. City of Milwaukee, 2012 WL 3240339*1.

 The Court cannot discern from counsel's motion to withdraw, for example, whether Plaintiff 

consents or objects to the motion. If Plaintiff objects to the motion, the Court cannot determine 

from counsel's vague reference to "irreconcilable differences" whether a valid and compelling

reason exists to allow him to withdraw from the case over any objection. The Court also cannot 

tell from counsel's motion whether he informed Plaintiff that he was going to seek leave to 

withdraw as his counsel before he filed the motion. The Court does note that counsel's notice of 

motion [92] appears to have been sent to an email address associated with Plaintiff's name or at 

least his initials, but that does not answer the question whether counsel communicated to his 

client his intent to seek to withdraw before he filed the motion. 

Rev. 10/2013 
 Accordingly, for these reasons, Kamron Memon's Motion to Withdraw [91] is denied 

without prejudice. If and to the extent counsel can cure the deficiencies in his motion noted in 

this order, the Court will consider any amended motion to withdraw counsel may file.

Plaintiff's counsel promptly shall provide a copy of this order to Plaintiff.

It is so ordered.

 

 

Date: 8/15/2014

 Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

Rev. 10/2013
# C_2017293EN.01000101.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 293/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 283, 28.8.2017

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 277, 21.8.2017

OJ C 269, 14.8.2017

OJ C 256, 7.8.2017

OJ C 249, 31.7.2017

OJ C 239, 24.7.2017

OJ C 231, 17.7.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
242.1105 Assignment of criticality designator. ( 1 ) Contracting officers shall— ( i ) Assign criticality designator A to items with a priority 01, 02, 03, or 06 (if emergency supply of clothing) under DoD Manual 4140.01, Volume 5, DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Procedures: Delivery of Materiel; and
( ii ) Ordinarily assign criticality designator C to unilateral purchase orders.
( 2 ) Only the contracting officer shall change the assigned designator.
[56 FR 36437, July 31, 1991, as amended at 67 FR 61516, Oct. 1, 2002, 82 FR 61481, Dec. 28, 2017]
#### 26.503 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Controlled substance* means a controlled substance in schedules I through V of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812), and as further defined in regulation at 21 CFR 1308.11-1308.15.

*Conviction* means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes.

*Criminal drug statute* means a Federal or non-Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of any controlled substance.

*Employee* means an employee of a contractor directly engaged in the performance of work under a Government contract. *Directly engaged* is defined to include all direct cost employees and any other contract employee who has other than a minimal impact or involvement in contract performance.

*Individual* means an offeror/contractor that has no more than one employee including the offeror/contractor.

[54 FR 4968, Jan. 31, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 21707, May 25, 1990; 66 FR 2130, Jan. 10, 2001.Redesignated at 89 FR 30244, Apr. 22, 2024]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Ronald Crosby

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05622

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

Eduardo Gonzalez, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, May 22, 2015:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Pursuant to the parties'

stipulation, this case is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs

and fees. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(mjc, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05622 Document #: 66 Filed: 05/22/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:190
Peer Reviewers (Field Readers) - OPE program offices continuously seek qualified individuals to review grant applications.  To streamline the grant application and review process, the OPE Field Reader System (FRS) has been retired and all reviewer information is migrated to the Department’s G5 system.  Follow the instructions in the G5 system and/or contact an OPE program office for additional assistance about the review process.

Grants.gov - The single access point for over 1,000 grant programs offered by all Federal grant making agencies.

G5 System:  G5 is the Department of Education's grants management system for program performance monitoring, communications with system users, grant award processing, and technical and financial stewardship.

Navigating to Program Information on ED.gov - Describes how to navigate to OPE program sites from the ED home page, and how to navigate within the program Web sites.

Guide to ED Programs - A concise  description of each of the programs that ED administers, identifies who may apply, and gives names, telephone numbers, and e-mail and Web addresses of ED offices to contact for more information. 

*Grantmaking at ED* - A non-technical summary of ED's discretionary grants process (application, review, award, administration, grant closeout, and audit) and the laws and regulations that govern the process.

Discretionary Grant Application Packages - A listing of grant competitions that are currently open and provides links to downloadable application packages, forms,  and other information you'll need to apply.

Grants and Contracts Information - Additional information including currently available contract solicitations, a forecast of upcoming  contract opportunities, grants policy bulletins, and other information.

*Federal Register* documents - Notices inviting applications for grant competitions, as well as funding priorities, selection criteria, regulations, and relevant workshops and meetings.

Education  Department General and Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) - The administrative requirements for managing projects funded by  discretionary grants awarded by ED.

Office of Management and Budget Grants Site - A link to OMB circulars, grants management forms, and grants policy documents.

USA.gov - The U.S. government's official Web portal.

Library: Legislation, Regulations, Etc. - A link to the authorizing legislation for OPE programs, program regulations, reports, and other relevant policy information.

Top

U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Postsecondary EducationLyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) Building400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Washington, DC  20202