alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jornal Oficial C 345/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 345 |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 58.° ano18 de outubro de 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 345

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

58.° ano18 de outubro de 2015

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informações |
| | INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA |
| | Conselho |
| 2015/C 345/01 | Declaração do Conselho | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

IV   Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Conselho

2015/C 345/01

Declaração do Conselho

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

IV Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Conselho

| 18.10.2015 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2015

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

C 345/1

---

DECLARAÇÃO DO CONSELHO

(2015/C 345/01)

O Conselho faz notar que o compromisso de levantar todas as sanções da UE relacionadas com o domínio nuclear, em conformidade com o Plano de Ação Conjunto Global (PACG), não prejudica o mecanismo de resolução de litígios especificado no PACG nem a reintrodução de sanções da UE em caso de incumprimento significativo, por parte do Irão, dos seus compromissos nos termos do PACG.

O Conselho compromete-se a reintroduzir sem demora todas as sanções da UE relacionadas com o domínio nuclear que estejam suspensas e/ou tenham cessado, no caso de o Irão não cumprir de forma significativa os seus compromissos no âmbito do PACG, e após recomendação conjunta ao Conselho pela Alta Representante da União Europeia para os Negócios Estrangeiros e a Política de Segurança, a França, a Alemanha e o Reino Unido.

---
dcconsultingagmnt.htm


Exhibit 10.6

 



 

 CONSULTING AGREEMENT

 

         This non-exclusive CONSULTING AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of this 22nd day of July, 2009, by and between GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), with its principal place of business at 101 California Street Suite 2450 San Francisco California, 94111, and DC
CONSULTING LLC, a Florida company (the "Consultant"), having its principal place of business at 1045 Primera Blvd. Suite 1033, Lake Mary, FL  32746.  The term of this agreement will be for 12 months from the date of execution.






	
I.  
	
STRATEGIC RESOURCING




DC Consulting will tap its network of strategic resources to assist GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY in the identification of individuals capable of furthering its business objectives, i.e. board building (if required), strategic business relationships, sales and marketing opportunities, or whatever is desired or mandated by management.






	
II.  
	
ANCILLARY CREATIVE/MARKETING/PRODUCTION SUPPORT




At GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY’s request, DC CONSULTING will serve as GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY’s liaison in negotiation with third party vendors, such as proxy solicitation service providers and the like, to ensure maximum possible cost and quality efficiencies.  Actual fees for these types of services will be submitted via
proposal to GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY for review (with no mark-up consideration), approval and payment prior to any ancillary services being performed.  Any ancillary services subject to any expense exceeding $0.01 must be submitted and pre-approved by GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY’s management team prior to incurrence.






	
III.  
	
FUNDING ADVISORY SERVICES




Upon request by GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY’s management team, DC CONSULTING will make strategic introductions to funding groups, investment banking firms, and/or other sources interested in furthering the business of GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY.  In the event that a private/public financing transaction is arranged and successfully implemented
using a source first introduced to the Company by DC CONSULTING, then DC CONSULTING shall be entitled to receive an advisory fee at closing equal to 7% of the gross proceeds received by the Company.





In addition; DC CONSULTING shall be entitles to receive 500,000 shares of restricted stock to be issued and delivered with execution of this consulting agreement.  GREENCHECK TECHNOLOGY will have a six month option to purchase the 500,000 shares at the (closing price x 500,000) on the day the certificate is issued and delivered
to DC Consulting LLC.





The State of jurisdiction in regards to this agreement shall be New York.

 



	 DC CONSULTING LLC	GREENCHEK TECHNOLOGY INC
	 Daniel Conway (D.C.)	 
	 DANIEL CONWAY	LINCOLN PARKE 
	 By: Daniel Conway 	By: Lincoln Parke
#### 252.232-7002 Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions.

As prescribed in 232.502-4-70(a), use the following clause:

# Progress Payments for Foreign Military Sales Acquisitions (MAY 2023)

If this contract includes foreign military sales (FMS) requirements, the Contractor shall—

(a) Submit separate progress payment requests for the FMS and U.S. line items in the contract;

(b) Submit a supporting schedule showing the amount of each request distributed to each country's requirements;

(c) Identify in each progress payment request the contract requirements to which it applies (*i.e.,* FMS or U.S.);

(d) Calculate each request on the basis of the prices, costs (including costs to complete), subcontract financing, and progress payment liquidations of the contract requirements to which it applies; and

(e) Distribute costs among the countries in a manner acceptable to the Administrative Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[88 FR 33833, May 25, 2023]
EXHIBIT 10.26 

ORAL AGREEMENT RE: CASH ADVANCES BY MICHAEL COHEN AND JOEL PENSLEY TO PROTEONOMIX, INC.




This document represents the terms and conditions of oral agreements relating to cash advances by Michael Cohen and Joel Pensley (individually a “Lender” and collectively the “Lenders”) to Proteonomix, Inc. (or under its former name National Stem Cell Holding, Inc.) (the “Company”).

From time to time a Lender will make cash advances or to pay bills of the Company (“Cash Advances”).

The Cash Advances will not bear interest and will not have a term by which they must be paid in order for the Company to avoid default i.e. there is no default provision.

The Lenders will keep accurate records of the dates and amounts of each Cash Advance and the method of payment of each Cash Advance, such as cash, check, wire etc.

The Cash Advances may be paid to the Company or may be paid directly to a creditor of the Company.

All Cash Advances must be preapproved by Michael Cohen, President of the Company

The Company may pay all or part of the Cash Advances to either Lender or both Lenders from time to time, in cash or in the Company’s common stock valued at “market” defined as the average closing price of the stock on the market or exchange on which the common stock trades for the ten trading days preceding payment of a Cash Advance.

The Cash Advances shall be listed as indebtedness to each Lender on the books and records of the Company.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-40729, 333-36750) and to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-74601, 333-64989,
333-56677, 333-51903, 333-43595, 333-42375, 333-34743, 333-34699, 333-31265,
33-44115, 33-31819, 33-23504, 33-7499, 2-89925, 33-10106, 33-38044, 33-16987,
33-62603, 333-36218) of Compaq Computer Corporation of our report dated January
25, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January
25, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
February 8, 2001
## Virginia Drone Services LLC

3724 Wainfleet Drive Richmond, VA 23235 January 13, 2016

Aircraft Information for a Phantom 3 Professional 

# AIRCRAFT Weight (including battery and propellers) 1280 g Diagonal size (including propellers) 590 mm Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max Descent Speed 3 m/s Hover Accuracy Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/- 0.5 m Horizontal: +/- 1.5 m Max Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) Max Service Ceiling Above Sea Level 6000 m (Default altitude limit: 120 m above takeoff point) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C GP S Mode GP S/GLONASS 

# INTELLIGENT FLIGHT B **ATTERY** Capacity 4480 mAh Voltage 15.2 V Battery Type LiPo 4SEnergy 68 Wh

Net Weight 365 g Max Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes Operating Temperature - 10°C to 40°C Max Charging Power 100 W
#### 243.205-70 Pricing of contract modifications.

Use the clause at 252.243-7001, Pricing of Contract Modifications, in solicitations and contracts when anticipating and using a fixed price type contract.

[56 FR 36446, July 31, 1991. Redesignated at 66 FR 49865, Oct. 1, 2001]
Pounds CO2 

Kilograms 

CO2

Pounds 

CO2 Kilograms CO2

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 

Factors: 

Per Unit of 

Volume or Mass

Volume or 

Mass

Million 

Btu Per Million Btu

Propane 12.7 gallon 5.8 gallon 139.0 63.1

Butane 14.8 gallon 6.7 gallon 143.2 65.0

Butane/Propane Mix 13.7 gallon 6.2 gallon 141.1 64.0

Home Heating and Diesel 

Fuel 22.4 gallon 10.2 gallon 161.3 73.2

Kerosene 21.5 gallon 9.8 gallon 159.4 72.3

Coal (All types) 4,631.5 short ton 2,100.8 short ton 210.2 95.3

Natural Gas 117.1

thousand cubic 

feet 53.1

thousand 

cubic feet 117.0 53.1

Gasoline 19.6 gallon 8.9 gallon 157.2 71.3

Residual Heating Fuel 

(Businesses only) 26 gallon 11.8 gallon 173.7 78.8

Jet Fuel 21.1 gallon 9.6 gallon 156.3 70.9

Aviation Gas 18.4 gallon 8.3 gallon 152.6 69.2

Flared natural gas 120.7

thousand cubic 

feet 54.7

thousand 

cubic feet 120.6 54.7

Petroleum coke 32.4 gallon 14.7 gallon 225.1 102.1

Other petroleum & 

miscellaneous 22.1 gallon 10.0 gallon 160.1 72.6

Asphalt and Road Oil 26.3 gallon 11.9 gallon 166.7 75.6

Lubricants 23.6 gallon 10.7 gallon 163.6 74.2

Petrochemical Feedstocks 24.7 gallon 11.2 gallon 156.6 71.0

Special Naphthas (solvents) 20.1 gallon 9.1 gallon 160.5 72.8

Waxes 21.1 gallon 9.6 gallon 160.1 72.6

Anthractie 5,685.0 short ton 2,578.7 short ton 228.6 103.7

Bituminous 4,931.3 short ton 2,236.8 short ton 205.7 93.3

Subbituminous 3,715.9 short ton 1,685.5 short ton 214.3 97.2

Lignite 2,791.6 short ton 1,266.2 short ton 215.4 97.7

Coke 6,239.7 short ton 2,830.3 short ton 251.6 114.1

Annual factors from the EIA Greenhouse Gas Inventory (discontinued)

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates.

Note: To convert to carbon equivalents multiply by 12/44.

Coefficients can vary slightly, depending upon estimation method.

Detailed factors from the Voluntary Reporting Program 

(discontinued)

http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/1605/coefficients.html

Carbon Dioxide Emissions Coefficients by Fuel

For homes and businesses

Other transportation fuels 

Industrial fuels and others not listed above

Nonfuel uses

Coals by type
2401.603-3 Appointment. ( a ) Appointments to officials not expressly delegated procurement authority by a published departmental delegation of authority shall be made in writing by the Head of the Contracting Activity. The Certificate of Appointment (SF 1402) shall constitute the appointing official's determination that the appointee meets the selection requirements set forth at 2401.603-2.
[64 FR 46094, Aug. 23, 1999]
#### 2501.101 Purpose.

These regulations implement and supplement the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR).
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 14-3625

___________________________ Peter Agaba Ngobya lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States 1 lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________ Submitted: July 16, 2015 Filed: July 23, 2015 [Unpublished]

____________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. 1 Loretta E. Lynch has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the United States, and is substituted as responde nt pursuant to Federa l Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).Tanzanian citizen Peter Agaba Ngobya petiti ons for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for asylum. After careful c onsideration of the issues before us, 2 we deny the petition, because we conclude that s ubstantial evidence supports the finding that Ngobya failed to establish past persecu tion or a well-founded fear of future persecution, due to any protected ground. SeeMatul-Hernandez v. Holder , 685 F.3d 707, 710-13 (8th Cir. 2012). The petiti on for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

2 The agency’s rulings denying withholdi ng of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture are not before us in this petition for review. -2-
# C_2016463EN.01000101.xml

| 13.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8260 — DCNS/SPI/DCNS Energies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 463/01)

On 5 December 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8260. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8260. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016456EN.01000102.xml

| 7.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 456/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 456/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8202 — Nidec/Emerson Electric (Leroy-Somer and Control Techniques divisions))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 456/02)

On 30 November 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8202. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8202. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

EASTERN AIR LINES GROUP, INC. ) DOCKET OST-2014-0012/13

 ) 

for a Certificate of Public Convenience ) 

and Necessity (Interstate Passenger ) 

Charter Service) ) 

_________________________________________ )

MOTION OF EASTERN AIR LINES GROUP, INC.

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Edward J. Wegel

President and CEO

EASTERN AIR LINES GROUP, INC.

Building 5A, Miami Int’l Airport

Miami, FL 33142

(305) 869-4249

ed.wegel@easternairlines.aero 

John R. Mietus, Jr.

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500

(202) 747-5212

john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for EASTERN AIR LINES

GROUP, INC.

October 27, 2014
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

EASTERN AIR LINES GROUP, INC. ) DOCKET OST-2014-0012/13

 ) October 27, 2014

for a Certificate of Public Convenience ) 

and Necessity (Interstate Passenger ) 

Charter Service) ) 

_________________________________________ )

MOTION OF EASTERN AIR LINES GROUP, INC.

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. 

§ 302.12, Eastern Air Lines Group, Inc. respectfully moves to withhold from 

public disclosure the contents of Confidential Exhibit J produced in response 

to the Department’s October 9, 2014 information request and referred to in 

the “Update Letter” that Eastern is filing simultaneously with this motion. 

In accordance with Rule 12, the exhibit has been marked “Confidential” and 

is being filed under seal.

Confidential Exhibit J contains the identity, address, and 

shareholdings of investors that purchased Eastern stock in a recent private 

offering and of investors that hold interests in certain founding investors of 

Eastern. (Persons and entities holding 10% or more of each entity have 

already been identified in prior, public filings.) This information is not 

public, and disclosure could cause these companies and individuals
#### John Gennusa, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Anthony Gennusa, et al., Respondents, v Lindenhurst Public Schools et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for permission to file a late notice of claim, the appeal is from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 10, 1977, as continued the petitioners’ motion as an application on behalf of the infant petitioner only, pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, and (2) an order of the same court, dated January 11, 1978, which, upon incorporating therein the order dated November 10, 1977, granted the infant petitioner leave to file a late notice of claim. Appeal from order dated November 10, 1977 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Order dated January 11, 1978 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The infant petitioner was injured on June 16, 1972. A letter giving notice of the accident and the nature of the petitioner’s injury was sent by the infant’s parents, and was received by the respondents on June 26, 1972. The letter set forth with particularity the details of the accident, the claimed negligence of the appellants, and the injuries sustained by the infant. This letter, while it did not furnish the post-office address of the claimants, otherwise substantially conformed with the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. The defects are not fatal. Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
**Program Office**: Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education**CFDA Number**: 84.259A**Program Type**: Discretionary/Competitive Grants**Also Known As**: NHCTEP

PROGRAM  DESCRIPTION

Under section 116 of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, which was reauthorized in 2018 under the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act (Perkins V), Congress appropriates roughly $3M annually for the Native Hawaiian Career and Technical Education Program (NHCTEP).  This program awards discretionary grants to community-based organizations primarily serving and representing Native Hawaiians to plan, conduct, and administer to support career and technical education (CTE) programs that lead to one-year certificates or two-year degrees.

TYPES OF PROJECTS

NHCTEP grantees use funds for expenses associated with developing challenging academic and technical standards, especially in preparation for high-skill, high-wage, or in--demand occupations in established or emerging professions; and providing technical assistance and professional development that improves the quality of career and technical education teachers, faculty, administrators, and counselors.  Students are provided stipends, tuition, books, fees, childcare, counseling, job placement, transportation, supplies, specialized tools, and uniforms that are necessary to fully and effectively participate in CTE programs.  

For Further Information

Please visit the Perkins Collaborative Resource Network (PCRN)  Last Modified: 02/08/2021
U.S
.Deportment of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration May 13 , 2016 Kerri A. Hinton Director, Airworthiness & Quality Assurance Kestrel Aircraft Company 1401 Tower Avenue Superior, Wisconsin 54880 Dear Ms. Hinton, 800 Independence Ave
.. SW
. Wash inglon
. 0 C 20591

This is in response to your May 12, 2016 letter requesting an extension ofthe comment period for the Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled, Part 23 Reorganization (Docket FAA-2015-1621). The NPRM comment period closes May 13,2016. We believe sufficient time has been given for interested persons to submit comments. Therefore, the Federal Aviation Administration does not find it in the best interest ofthe public to extend the comment period. Your request for an extension ofthe comment period is denied. However, as stated in 14 Code ofFederal Regulations 

### § 11.45 , we will consider comments filed late ifat all possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We have placed this response with your request in the rulemaking docket. Sincerely,
Acting Director, Office ofRulemaking Aviation Safety