alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 769 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to align physician supervision 

requirements under the Medicare program for radiology services performed by advanced level radiographers with State requirements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2017 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to align 

physician supervision requirements under the Medicare 

program for radiology services performed by advanced 

level radiographers with State requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Access to 

5 Radiology Care Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 769 IS

1 SEC. 2. ALIGNING PHYSICIAN SUPERVISION REQUIRE2 MENTS UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM 

3 FOR RADIOLOGY SERVICES PERFORMED BY 

4 ADVANCED LEVEL RADIOGRAPHERS WITH 

5 STATE REQUIREMENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(b) of the Social Se7 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(b)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (6), by inserting ‘‘, subject to 

9 paragraph (7),’’ after ‘‘includes radiology services’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(7) TREATMENT OF SERVICES PERFORMED BY

14 ADVANCED LEVEL RADIOGRAPHERS.—For purposes 

15 of paragraph (6), in the case of radiology services 

16 performed by an advanced level radiographer (as de17 fined in section 1861(jjj)) in a State that has estab18 lished standards for the direction or supervision by 

19 a physician of such a radiographer performing such 

20 services, such services shall be treated as performed 

21 under the direction or supervision of a physician if 

22 such services are performed under the direction or 

23 supervision of a physician to the extent required 

24 under such State law.’’. 

25 (b) ADVANCED LEVEL RADIOGRAPHER DEFINED.— 

26 Section 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x) 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 769 IS

1 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘Advanced Level Radiographer 

4 ‘‘(jjj) The term ‘advanced level radiographer’ means 

5 a radiographer who is certified by the American Registry 

6 of Radiologic Technologists as a registered radiologist as7 sistant or by the Certification Board for Radiology Practi8 tioner Assistants as a radiology practitioner assistant to 

9 perform radiology services under the supervision of a radi10 ologist.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply with respect to services performed 

13 on or after the date that is 60 days after the date of the 

14 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Wegener Corporation
Duluth, Georgia

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statements (File No. 33-45390,  No. 33-42007,  No. 333-08017,  No. 33-27527, No.
333-29887,  No. 33-51205,  and No.  333-29889) of our reports dated November 14,
2003, relating to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Wegener
Corporation and  Subsidiaries  appearing in the Company's  Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended August 29, 2003.


Atlanta, Georgia                                  BDO Seidman, LLP
November 26, 2003
- Program Office:
      - Rehabilitation Services Administration
      - CFDA Number:
      - No CFDA number

The Vending Facility program authorized by the Randolph-Sheppard Act provides persons who are blind with remunerative employment and self-support through the operation of vending facilities on federal and other property. 

**Decisions of Arbitration Panels**

Under section 107d-2(c) of the Randolph-Sheppard Act, the Secretary of Education publishes the **decisions of arbitration panels** selected to adjudicate disputes over the administration of vending facilities on federal and other property.

### For complete information on this program, go to:

**rsa.ed.gov**
EXHIBIT 31(iv)

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, John E. Kirksey, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Camco Financial Corporation; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                              
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: July 13, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ John E. Kirksey          
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | John E. Kirksey              
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
S. Con. Res. 44 Agreed to August 28, 2018

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That in recognition of the long and distinguished service 

rendered to the Nation by John Sidney McCain, III, a Senator 

from the State of Arizona and formerly a Representative from 

that State, his remains be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda 

of the Capitol on August 31 and September 1, 2018, and the 

Architect of the Capitol, under the direction of the President pro 

tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take all necessary steps for the accomplishment of 

that purpose. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
#### Joseph Yuki SOTOMURA and Grace Fumiye Sotomura, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF HAWAII, et al., Defendants, and George R. Ariyoshi, Governor of Hawaii, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Nos. 80-4488, 80-4498.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 7, 1982.

Wayne Minami, Atty. Gen., Chelun Huang, Jackie Mahi Erickson, Deputy Attys. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, Clifford H. F. Lum, Corp. Counsel, Bruce Ito, Deputy Corp. Counsel, County of Hawaii, Hilo, Ha- ' waii, for defendants-appellants/cross-appellees.

Clinton Ashford and Douglas MacDougal, of Ashford & Wriston, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants.

ORDER

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, SKO-PIL and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

The Sotomuras obtained a judgment in their civil rights suit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants appealed. After briefs were filed on the merits and on the Sotomuras’ motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely, we granted the motion to dismiss. The Sotomuras now seek attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for services performed in connection with the appeal. The Sotomuras are “prevailing parties,” a prerequisite to such an award, even though they prevailed by obtaining dismissal of the appeal as untimely rather than affirmance on the merits. *Hastings v. Maine-Endwell Central School District, New York,*676 F.2d 893, 896 (2d Cir. 1982). *Cf. Maher v. Gayne,*448 U.S. 122, 129, 100 S.Ct. 2570, 2575, 65 L.Ed.2d 653 (1980); *Williams v. Alioto,*625 F.2d 845, 847-48 (9th Cir. 1980).

Normally fees are not awardable to a party who prevails on appeal only because of erroneous procedural or evidentiary rulings below. *Hanrahan v. Hampton,*446 *153U.S. 754, 759, 100 S.Ct. 1987, 1990, 64 L.Ed.2d 670 (1980). But this court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss was not interlocutory but final and, in effect, conclusively determined the “substantial rights of the parties.” *Id.*at 757, 100 S.Ct. at 1989. Our dismissal contemplates no future proceedings involving the merits of the controversy which could change the favorable result obtained by the Sotomuras. *Swietlowich v. County of Buchs,*620 F.2d 33, 34 (3d Cir. 1980). Viewing the litigation as a whole, *Gurule v. Wilson,*635 F.2d 782, 791 (10th Cir. 1981), the Sotomuras successfully defended the district court judgment in their favor and are “prevailing parties” under section 1988.

The Sotomuras seek $34,941.40 in attorneys’ fees. Although the issues were complex, most of the legal arguments had already been briefed before the district court. The hours claimed for preparation of the briefs on appeal appear to involve some duplication and inefficiency. Upon due consideration, we award attorneys’ fees in the amount of $25,000, plus costs in the amount of $158.86.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

FRANK W. WHITE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) No. 12 C 5176

JAMES POLCYN, OWCP District Director, )

ANTONIA A. RIOS, OWCP District Director, )

HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, )

)

Defendants. )

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge:

For the reasons explained below, plaintiff Frank W. White’s application to proceed in 

forma pauperis on appeal (Dkt. No. 52) is denied, as his is motion for appointment of counsel 

(Dkt. No. 53). In addition, Mr. White’s motion for a mental examination (Dkt. No. 50) and his 

supplemental motion (Dkt. No. 51) are terminated as moot because the court does not have 

jurisdiction over those motions following the filing of Mr. White’s notice of appeal. (Dkt. No. 43.) 

Statement

Requests to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) are reviewed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. To 

ensure that indigent litigants have meaningful access to the courts, § 1915 allows an indigent 

litigant to commence an action or appeal in federal court without paying the administrative costs of 

the lawsuit. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 27 (1992); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324

(1989). However, the court must deny a request to proceed IFP if (1) the allegation of poverty is 

untrue; (2) the action is frivolous; (3) the action fails to state a claim; or (4) the action seeks 

monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

Here, Mr. White has repeatedly sought the same relief from multiple courts, and his claims 

have repeatedly been dismissed. (See Dkt. No. 41.) As a result, Mr. White’s claims in this action 

were dismissed on the ground of res judicata. (See id.) Although the court does not doubt that Mr. 

White sincerely believes that he has been wronged, and the court appreciates Mr. White’s sincerity 

and diligence, he has had his day in court multiple times. Any further litigation of this matter, 

which involves events that occurred over twenty years ago, is excessive, unnecessary, and 

frivolous. Accordingly, the court denies Mr. White’s application to proceed IFP and his motion for 

appointment of counsel.
2

In addition, Mr. White’s motion for a mental examination (Dkt. No. 50) and his 

supplemental motion (Dkt. No. 51) are terminated as moot because the court does not have 

jurisdiction over those motions following the filing of Mr. White’s notice of appeal. See Kusay v. 

United States, 62 F.3d 192, 193-94 (7th Cir. 1995) (“The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of 

jurisdictional significance—it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district 

court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.” (citation and quotation 

marks omitted)). 

ENTER:

_______________________________

JAMES F. HOLDERMAN

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Date: March 4, 2013
#### 232.903 Responsibilities.

In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3801(b), DoD shall assist small business concerns by providing payment as quickly as possible, to the fullest extent permitted by law, with a goal of 15 days after receipt of proper invoices and all required documentation, including acceptance, and before normal payment due dates established in the contract (see 232.906(a)).

[85 FR 19697, Apr. 8, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 76995, Dec. 16, 2022]
NEW WITS   ·   HOME   ·  INCIDENTS   ·   REPORTS   ·   EXPORTS   ·   METHODOLOGY   ·   PRIVACY AND USE         ·   HELPPublished          :   AnalyticalPUBLISHED REPORTS
2009       
- 2009 NCTC Report on         Terrorism 

2008       
- 2008 NCTC Report on Terrorism          
- 2008 CRT Press Conference         Slides 

2007       
- 2007 NCTC Report on         Terrorism 

2006       
- 2006 NCTC Report on Terrorist         Incidents 

2005       
- NCTC Report on Incidents of Terrorism         2005
#### Frederica Edelman, Respondent, v. Irving Edelman, Appellant.

Judgment of separation unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to provide for the payment of $80 a week by defendant for support of plaintiff and $80 a week for the support of the children of the parties; by staking out the direction for maintenance of the children in Summer camp, for cash payments to buy furniture and establish a residence, and for maintenance of insurance and for dental care; and as thus modified affirmed, without costs. The standard of living of the parties before separation and the disputed proof of defendant’s net professional and business earnings suggest payments for support somewhat lower than the $200 a week fixed in the decree. The directions for payments other than alimony and support seem unwarranted. *(Ostrom*V. *Ostrom,*270 App. Div. 872; *Donnelly*v. *Donnelly,*272 App. Div. 779; *Adelman*v. *Adelmcm,*3 A D 2d 839). Settle order on notice. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Bergan and Bastow, JJ.
1

Aerial Inspection Resources,Inc.

4380 SW Macadam Ave.

Suite 515

Portland, OR 97239

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com

U.S. Department of Transportation January 27, 2015

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. ExemptionNo. 11467

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0261

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. (AIR) is requesting amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 

11467, Docket No. FAA-2015-0261 for the purpose of conducting commercial UAS operations. In 

addition to the DJI S1000, DJI S900, DJI S800, and Ready Copter, AIR wishes to add the EZ-Rig to its 

exemption grant, with the authority to operate with a tethered line attached to the UA. 

For your ease in reviewing this request for amendment, please refer to the exhibit list which 

begins on page 2. 

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this 

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 503-312-9804 or via email at 

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com.

Thank you,

Drew Pairamore

Director of Regulatory Compliance

Aerial Inspection Resources,Inc.
2

Table of Contents 

EZ Rig Exhibit

Exhibit 1: EZ Rig User Manual ...........................Uploaded separately due to size constraints
3

.
September 21, 2017

Dear Colleague:

During  the past few weeks, as the Nation anxiously watched Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and  Maria and their resulting destruction, the U.S. Department of Education (Department)  reached out to officials in affected areas. Our immediate concern is for the  safety and well-being of all who are affected by these natural disasters,  particularly those who have suffered the loss of their homes and schools and must  deal with displacement and trauma in their lives. President Trump has directed Federal  agencies to work together to remove barriers and to expedite the work necessary  to recover from the hurricanes, and I assure you that the Department is working closely with  other Federal, State and local agencies to carry out this relief.

The first steps in a  successful recovery are to assess each State's needs and to relieve burdens for  students, families and educational institutions in Alabama, Florida, Georgia,  Louisiana, South Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as other States that may receive  displaced students or be otherwise impacted. To assist you in this process, the  Department is providing the attached initial guidance that explains available waivers  from Federal requirements in certain Department programs and other potential forms  of relief. This guidance provides State educational agencies, local educational  agencies, Bureau of Indian Education-funded schools, postsecondary institutions  and other Department grantees and program participants, including charter  schools and nonpublic schools, with information about the flexibility that is  available to help maintain continuity of operations and education during a  period of recovery. We recognize that some  communities face more immediate concerns, but we encourage you to consider the flexibilities and  support that you may need. The Department is here to help. 

For children of affected families, returning to school can provide stability in a time of upheaval as they reconstruct their lives. The Department stands ready to provide whatever flexibility and  support it can to help ensure all children, particularly those in  the hurricane-impacted areas, receive a quality education.

As you assess the  damage and your recovery needs, please continue to reach out to the Department—the attached guidance includes a variety of ways to do so—and do not hesitate to let us know your needs and what other questions you may have as your assessments and  recovery continue.  

My colleagues and I  look forward to working with all of you in the coming days, weeks and months on  this critical effort. Please know that we appreciate the significant work you  are doing to address the needs of your education communities and to implement  relief efforts.

|  | Sincerely,  |
|--|-------------|
|  | /s/         |
|  | Betsy DeVos |

----

Attachments

Non-Regulatory Guidance on Flexibility and Waivers for Grantees and Program Participants Impacted by Federally Declared Disasters

Department of Education Contacts
  Last Modified: 09/22/2017
217.7406 Contract clauses. ( a ) Use the clause at FAR 52.216-24, Limitation of Government Liability, in— ( 1 ) All UCAs;
( 2 ) Solicitations associated with UCAs;
( 3 ) Basic ordering agreements;
( 4 ) Indefinite-delivery contracts;
( 5 ) Any other type of contract providing for the use of UCAs; and
( 6 ) Unpriced change orders with an estimated value exceeding $5 million.
( b ) ( 1 ) Use the clause at 252.217-7027, Contract Definitization, in— ( i ) All UCAs;
( ii ) Solicitations associated with UCAs;
( iii ) Basic ordering agreements;
( iv ) Indefinite-delivery contracts;
( v ) Any other type of contract providing for the use of UCAs; and
( vi ) Unpriced change orders with an estimated value exceeding $5 million.
( 2 ) Insert the applicable information in paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) of the clause.
( 3 ) If, at the time of entering into the UCA or unpriced change order, the contracting officer knows that the definitive contract action will meet the criteria of FAR 15.403-1, 15.403-2, or 15.403-3 for not requiring submission of certified cost or pricing data, the words “and certified cost or pricing data” may be deleted from paragraph (a) of the clause.
[75 FR 48277, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 76940, Dec. 31, 2012]
Contents

      - OSEP Annual Reports 
      -  *IDEA* 618 Data Products  

 Top

----

OSEP Annual Reports

OSEP's *Annual Reports to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act* (*IDEA*) 

 Top

----

*IDEA* Section 618 Data Products

Section 618 of the *Individuals with Disabilities Education Act* (*IDEA*) requires that each state submit **data** about the infants and toddlers, birth through age 2, who receive early intervention services under Part C of *IDEA* and children with disabilities, ages 3 through 21, who receive special education and related services under Part B of *IDEA*.

Go to  ***IDEA*****Section 618 Data Products**.

 Top

----
### EAARL Coastal Topography-Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana, 2010: Bare Earth

By: Amar NayegandhiJamie M. Bonisteel-CormierJohn Brock**A. H. SallengerC. Wayne WrightDavid B. Nagle**Saisudha VivekanandanXan YatesEmily S. Klipp

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds511

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
Functional Statements > Office of Finance and Operations

The Assistant Secretary acts for the Secretary in the administration of the Department and represents and advises the Secretary on all inter- and intra-agency administrative matters (e.g., procurement, enterprise risk management, financial management, grants management, human capital management, personnel security and facilities management, and business support systems) as well as other activities and functions as directed. The Assistant Secretary provides leadership on all operational matters, offering expertise and technical assistance to the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary on the implementation of major management reform initiatives such as those mandated by the President's Management Initiatives and the Government Performance and Results Act Modernization Act of 2010. Additionally, the Assistant Secretary serves as a standing member of the Department's Senior Management Council (SMC)— the primary governance body for advising the Deputy Secretary on all matters related to operations and management of Department programs, functions, and activities.  The Assistant Secretary for Finance and Operations is supported by a Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, who serves as the Department's Deputy CFO.

The Immediate Office of the Assistant Secretary for Finance and Operations is responsible for supporting the Assistant Secretary's overall direction and administration of the Department's administrative management functions and coordinates programs with those of other Federal agencies, such as the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the General Services Administration (GSA), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and with members of Congress.

Top
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: 

JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00150-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law Number Seven

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20190C0586)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on Appellant’s voluntary motion to dismiss the appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a) (governing voluntary dismissal of appeals in criminal cases). Appellant 

represents in the motion that he no longer wishes to pursue this appeal. Along with his counsel’s 

signature, the motion also bears Appellant’s signature on its face. We have not yet issued an 

opinion in this case. Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss, and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

September 1, 2023

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)