alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    448141000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        31977000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       4379000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                37219000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               521716000
<COMMON>                                      44941000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          114351000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               159292000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    3475000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         142153000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             3500000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               213296000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                521716000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     92641000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           7347000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    67794000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    75141000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       17500000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               79000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                17579000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       5779000
<NET-INCOME>                                  11800000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      76000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 11724000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       6657000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      5779000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        23107000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of David Sikoff, Respondent, v. Fleet Messenger Service, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The employer and carrier produced no expert proof nor all of the documentary evidence apparently available and chose to rest their case on the issue of their witness’ veracity, as opposed to *981that of claimant, who denied signing the purported release. Questions of credibility are, of course, for the board; and upon the entire record we find no legal basis for a holding by us that the determination was not upon substantial evidence. Appellants’ single point is that the board was “without jurisdiction to declare the third party release invalid”, this in sole reliance upon *Matter of Cristiano*v. *Ninfa’s Rest.*(285 App. Div. 560); but the board’s determination in the case before us was not of invalidity and the authority cited is not relevant. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 1 of 27 PageID #:223
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 2 of 27 PageID #:224
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 3 of 27 PageID #:225
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 4 of 27 PageID #:226
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 5 of 27 PageID #:227
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 6 of 27 PageID #:228
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 7 of 27 PageID #:229
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 8 of 27 PageID #:230
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 9 of 27 PageID #:231
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 10 of 27 PageID #:232
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 11 of 27 PageID #:233
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 12 of 27 PageID #:234
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 13 of 27 PageID #:235
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 14 of 27 PageID #:236
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 15 of 27 PageID #:237
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 16 of 27 PageID #:238
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 17 of 27 PageID #:239
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 18 of 27 PageID #:240
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 19 of 27 PageID #:241
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 20 of 27 PageID #:242
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 21 of 27 PageID #:243
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 22 of 27 PageID #:244
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 23 of 27 PageID #:245
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 24 of 27 PageID #:246
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 25 of 27 PageID #:247
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 26 of 27 PageID #:248
Case: 1:12-cv-05843 Document #: 56-4 Filed: 12/06/13 Page 27 of 27 PageID #:249
#### BROWN, Appellant, v. BROWN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

Jan. 3, 1906.)

Action by Marcella Brown against Adam Brown.

No opinion. Judgment modified, by striking out the allowance of costs, and, as thus modified, said judgment and the order are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.
#### 252.217-7016 Plant protection.

As prescribed in 217.7104(a), use the following clause:

# Plant Protection (DEC 1991)

(a) The Contractor shall provide, for the plant and work in process, reasonable safeguards against all hazards, including unauthorized entry, malicious mischief, theft, vandalism, and fire.

(b) The Contractor shall also provide whatever additional safeguards are necessary to protect the plant and work in process from espionage, sabotage, and enemy action.

(1) The Government shall reimburse the Contractor for that portion of the costs of the additional safeguards that is allocable to the contract in the same manner as if the Contracting Officer had issued a change order for the additional safeguards.

(2) The costs reimbursed shall not include any overhead allowance, unless the overhead is incident to the construction or installation of necessary security devices or equipment.

(c) Upon payment by the Government of the cost of any device or equipment required or approved under paragraph (b) of this clause, title shall vest in the Government.

(1) The Contractor shall comply with the instructions of the Contracting Officer concerning its identification and disposition.

(2) No such device or equipment shall become a fixture as a result of its being affixed to realty not owned by the Government.

(End of clause)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Beckham BAKER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-10134.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 13, 2008.

Filed June 4, 2008.

Nancy J. Koppe, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Lloyd George, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Arthur L. Allen, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, HAWKINS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Beckham Baker pled guilty to two separate indictments charging him with receiv*706ing and possessing child pornography. Having reserved his rights to challenge the district court’s denial of his two motions to suppress, he argues on appeal that the search warrants executed against him were not supported by probable cause. As the parties are familiar with the underlying facts, they will not be repeated here.

Baker argues that the first search warrant was defective under *Franks v. Delaware,*438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). Though admittedly false statements were included in the supporting affidavit, the evidence of record does not give rise to a “definite and firm conviction that the district court made a mistake in finding that the affidavit did not intentionally or recklessly misstate [facts].” *United States v. Elliott,*322 F.3d 710, 715 (9th Cir.2003) (internal quotation marks omitted). In any event, we are persuaded that the search warrant was adequately supported by probable cause even without considering the false statements. *United States v. Martinez-Garcia,*397 F.3d 1205, 1215 (9th Cir.2005); *see also United States v. Gourde,*440 F.3d 1065, 1071 (9th Cir.2006) (en banc) (holding that becoming a paying member of a child pornography website gives rise to a “fan-probability” that defendant viewed and downloaded such images); *United States v. Froman,*355 F.3d 882, 891 (5th Cir.2004) (holding that voluntary membership in Candyman e-Group supports probable cause given that the “predominant purpose of this group [is] to engage in collection and distribution of child pornography”).

Baker argues the second search warrant was also lacking probable cause because the affiant’s expert statements regarding “preferential child sex offenders” failed to satisfy the standard established in *United States v. Weber,*923 F.2d 1338, 1345 (9th Cir.1990). We disagree. The affiant laid a sufficient foundation regarding the habits and practices of child sex offenders reasonably to conclude, for purposes of establishing probable cause to search, that Baker is among such class. *Id.) United States v. Kelley,*482 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir.2007) (“[P]robable cause means a ‘fail-probability’ that contraband or evidence is located in a particular place.... Neither certainty nor a preponderance of the evidence is required.”).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
# C_2018023EN.01000701.xml

| 23.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 January 2018

(2018/C 23/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2239 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4442 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88085 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8340 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1764 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6223 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,399 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1707 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6670 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,6552 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5287 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5270 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5689 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6758 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6151 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 309,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8092 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8374 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4355 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 341,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8160 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,288 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,2819 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,993 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9083 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,8062 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,2225 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2239

JPY

Japanese yen

135,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4442

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88085

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8340

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1764

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6223

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,399

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1707

RON

Romanian leu

4,6670

TRY

Turkish lira

4,6552

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5287

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5270

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5689

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6758

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6151

KRW

South Korean won

1 309,98

ZAR

South African rand

14,8092

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8374

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4355

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 341,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8160

PHP

Philippine peso

62,288

RUB

Russian rouble

69,2819

THB

Thai baht

38,993

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9083

MXN

Mexican peso

22,8062

INR

Indian rupee

78,2225

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Mildred Gruberger, as Administratrix of the Estate of Max Gruberger, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Tobey Titus, as Administratrix of the Estate of Horace Titus, Deceased, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Motion by respondents for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, granted. The following question is certified: Was the order of this court, dated May 21, 1962, properly made? Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
skip to page content  Enter your search textButton to start search» Open Advanced Search- Home 
- Veteran Services 
- Business 
- About VA 
- Media Room 
- Locations 
- Contact Us 
- Life Insurance 

Servicemembers' & Veterans' Group Life Insurance
- Life Insurance   Home 
- Servicemembers' &   Veterans' Group Life Insurance 
- Other VA Life   Insurance 
VGLI Online Policy Access- Access Your VGLI   Coverage Information Online 
- Apply for VGLI   Online 

Coverage and Features
Insurance Coverage   		
- SGLI 
- VGLI 
- Family   SGLI 
- SGLI   Traumatic Injury Protection 
Insurance Features   		
- SGLI   Disability Extension 
- Accelerated   Benefits Option 
- Free   Financial Counseling Service 
- Conversion   to a Permanent Plan 

Insurance Resources
- Contact   OSGLI 
- Download   SGLI & VGLI Forms 
- SGLI   & VGLI Legislation 
- Insurance   Tools 
- Handbooks &   Publications 
- VGLI   Newsletter 
- Subscribe to   I-News 

VGLI Newsletters 

The Office of Servicemembers� Group Life Insurance (OSGLI) established this newsletterto keep our customers informed of changes that may directly affect your Veterans�Group Life Insurance (VGLI) policy. Follow the link below to view the VGLI newsletter.

VGLI Newsletter Volume 1 - October 2007 VGLI Newsletter Volume 2 - October 2008VGLI Newsletter Volume 3 - October 2009 

Compensation and Pension | GI Bill | Vocational Rehabilitation | Home Loans | Life Insurance | Survivors' Benefits | Regional Office HomepagesManuals & Regulations | Reports & Surveys | If You Owe VA Money | GovBenefits.gov

VA Home |  Privacy Policy |  FOIA |  Web Policies |  No FEAR Act Data |  Site Index |  USA.gov |  White House |  National Resource Directory |  Inspector General

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs - 810 Vermont Avenue, NW - Washington, DC 20420

Reviewed/Updated Date: January 11, 2010
## FY 2020

Total FY 2020 Combined TPSID and TPSID-CC Programs Appropriation: $11.8 million dollarsTPSID:                            $9,702,000TPSID-CC:                      $2,000,000 Total Number of FY 2020 TPSID Program Awards:        22Total Number of FY 2020 TPSID-CC Program Awards:   1 

## FY 2019

No new awards this fiscal year.

## FY 2018

No new awards this fiscal year.

## FY 2017

No new awards this fiscal year.

## FY 2016

No new funding this fiscal year. Since FY 2015, only non-competing continuation (NCC) awards have been made.Funding for NCCs:  $9,800,000

## FY 2015

$9,800,000 for 27 new awards

## FY 2014

No new funding this fiscal year. Since FY 2010, only non-competing continuation (NCC) awards have been made.Funding for NCCs:  $9,950,980

## FY 2013

No new funding this fiscal year. Since FY 2010, only non-competing continuation (NCC) awards have been made.Funding for NCCs:  $10,072,598

## FY 2012

No new funding this fiscal year.  Since FY 2010, only non-competing continuation (NCC) awards have been made.Funding for NCCs:  $10,628,534

## FY 2011

Funding for NCCs:  $10,978,000.

The Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Pub. L. 112-10), recently passed by Congress provides funding for the Department of Education for the remainder of Federal Fiscal Year 2011.  That law appropriates $10,978,000 for the TPSID program for this fiscal year.  The Department expects to make non-competing continuation awards in the summer of 2011.  

## FY 2010

The Department made 27 awards in FY 2010, each not exceeding $500,000.  Each TPSID grant will be funded for five years.

Institutional Service Home
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 23
- 00236
- CV Christopher De Leon d/b/a De Leon Aircraft Maintenance Professional v. Prabhuvaram J. Maddela On Appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C
- 1355
- 22
- E
JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for fu rther proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee
. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 29, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK Multi-Center Clinical Trial Cooperative Agreement (U01 Clinical Trial Required).                    

*Date:*                         March 2, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ann A. Jerkins, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7119, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 301-594-2242,                         *jerkinsa@niddk.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 29, 2021.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-02306 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2017180EN.01000401.xml

| 8.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 June 2017

(2017/C 180/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1217 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4387 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86908 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7953 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0843 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5023 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,316 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,66 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1913 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5703 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9747 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4845 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5085 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7422 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5599 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5499 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 261,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4307 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6253 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4058 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 919,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7790 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,573 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,5152 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,166 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6694 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4388 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,1780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1217

JPY

Japanese yen

122,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4387

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86908

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7953

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0843

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5023

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,316

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,66

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1913

RON

Romanian leu

4,5703

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9747

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4845

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5085

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7422

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5599

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5499

KRW

South Korean won

1 261,41

ZAR

South African rand

14,4307

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6253

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4058

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 919,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7790

PHP

Philippine peso

55,573

RUB

Russian rouble

63,5152

THB

Thai baht

38,166

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6694

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4388

INR

Indian rupee

72,1780

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Order entered January 11, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00631-CR

BABLOO JOHN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 9

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB17-63534-K

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s January 7, 2021 second motion for an 

extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief 

received with the motion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Mary New et al., v New York State Board of Social Welfare et al.

Motion for reargument denied, and leave granted to petitioners, *sua sponte,*to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Lane and Lupiano, JJ.