alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.13.1

                      FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUPPLY AGREEMENT
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
            SOUZA CRUZ S.A. AND COMPANHIA INDUSTRIAL DE PAPEL PIRAHY
                          DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 2, 1998


         This First Amendment to Supply Agreement is entered into by and
between Schweitzer-Mauduit do Brasil, S.A., successor in interest to Companhia
Industrial de Papel Pirahy, and Souza Cruz S.A. this 23rd day of February 2000.


         The parties hereto agree to amend the Supply Agreement as follows:

         1.       The first sentence of Article VIII, Term, subsection (a),
shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new sentence:

                  "This Agreement will remain in force for an initial period of
                  six (6) years from the date of its execution."

         2.       Except as expressly amended herein, the terms and conditions
of the Supply Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



Schweitzer-Mauduit do Brasil, S.A.                    Souza Cruz S.A.

By:                                         By:
   --------------------------------            ------------------------------

Title:                                      Title:
      -----------------------------               ---------------------------



Witnessed by:                               Witnessed by:


----------------------------------          ---------------------------------
Signature                                   Signature


----------------------------------          ---------------------------------
Print Name                                  Print name


----------------------------------          ---------------------------------
Identification Number                       Identification Number
#### 252.237-7003 Requirements.

As prescribed in 237.7003(a) and (a)(1), use the following clause:

# Requirements (DEC 1991)

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this clause, the Government will order from the Contractor all of its requirements in the area of performance for the supplies and services listed in the schedule of this contract.

(b) Each order will be issued as a delivery order and will list—

(1) The supplies or services being ordered;

(2) The quantities to be furnished;

(3) Delivery or performance dates;

(4) Place of delivery or performance;

(5) Packing and shipping instructions;

(6) The address to send invoices; and

(7) The funds from which payment will be made.

(c) The Government may elect not to order supplies and services under this contract in instances where the body is removed from the area for medical, scientific, or other reason.

(d) In an epidemic or other emergency, the contracting activity may obtain services beyond the capacity of the Contractor's facilities from other sources.

(e) Contracting Officers of the following activities may order services and supplies under this contract—

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 3416, Jan. 23, 2006; 84 FR 48505, Sept. 13, 2019]
Case: 1:12-cv-05131 Document #: 32 Filed: 10/18/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:168
Case: 1:12-cv-05131 Document #: 32 Filed: 10/18/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:169
Case: 1:12-cv-05131 Document #: 32 Filed: 10/18/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:170
Case: 1:12-cv-05131 Document #: 32 Filed: 10/18/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:171
Case: 1:12-cv-05131 Document #: 32 Filed: 10/18/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:172
Case: 1:12-cv-05131 Document #: 32 Filed: 10/18/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:173
Case: 1:12-cv-05131 Document #: 32 Filed: 10/18/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:174
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 148 ) IV-C-11 5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:59 AM Sheet 148 of 232P. 2

<•• ' 

# SI S UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e ofAi rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1

1 6 MA V198 8 Mr . Stev e Pezd a For d Moto rCompan

y Worl d Headquarter s Pos tOffic e Ro

x189 9 Roo m 23 6 Dearborn , M I 4812 1 Dea rMr . Pezda : Thi s lette ri s i n respons e t o you rApri l telephon e reques t concernin g ris k fro m exposur e t o benzen e fro m gasolin e marketin g sources . Specifically , yo u wante d t o kno

wi fth e baselin e lifetim e risk s presente d o n Tabl e 2-2 7 i n EPA' s Jul y198 7 Draf tRegulator yImpac tAnalysi s documen tfo rth e onboar d refuelin g proposa l wer e fo rbenzen e o rtota l gasolin e vapors . Tabl e 2-2 7 present s onl yth e highes tris k calculate d fo reac h source . I n thi s case , th e highes trisk s ar e fro m tota l gasolin e vapors . Th e enclose d tabl e provide s bot h th e gasolin e vapo ran d benzen e ris k estimates . I n addition , yo u had some question s as t o ho wthes e benzen e ris k estimate s migh trelat e t o th e recen tEP Adecisio n o n othe rbenzen e sources . Pe r ou rconservation , yo u nee d t o discus s thos e question s wit h Mr . Gi l Wood , Chief , Regulatio n Preparation s Sectio n a t91 9 541-5625 . I fyo u have an yothe rquestion s concernin g th e gasolin e marketin g analysis , pleas e cal l m e a t91 9 541-5397 .

Sincerely , Stephe n A . Shed d Petroleu m Sectio n Chemical s an d Petroleu m Branc h 1 Enclosur e cc : Onboard Refuelin g Publi cDocke tNo . A-87-1 1 Gi l Wood , SOB/ES D (MD-13 )P. 3 

# o

^GEWCy R ° TECr '0( V 

## SEcrigjoe r

### 5/10/8 8

SUMMAR Y O F BENZENE (Bz ) AND GASOLINE VAPO R (GV ) RIS K FROM GASOLINE MARKETIN G SOURCES 3 P. 4



### Sourc e Lifetime Ris k FromHighExposure* 3 

### Befor e Control s Afte r Control c 

### B z G

V B z G V
BUL K TERMINAL S 2.0*10~ 4 

### 5.7*1 0 - 3 3.4*10 -5 

### 9.8*1 0 - 4
BUL K PLANT S 7.1*1 0 - 6 2.0*1 0 - 4 1.3*10" 6 

### 3.6*1 0 - 5 SERVIC E STATIONS :

- Communit yExposur e Stag e I 4.7*10" 6 

### 6.7*1 0 - 5 4.5*10~ 7 

### 6.4*1 0 - 6 Stag e I I 6.3*1 0 - 6 9.1*1 0 - 5 6.5*10" 7 

### 8.6*10" 6 

### Tota l Communit y1.1*1 0 - 5 1.6*1 0 - 4 1.1*10~ 6 

### 1.5*10~ 5



### - Self-servic e 1.3*1 0 - 5 7.9*1 0 - 5 1.8*10 - 6 

### 2.4*1 0 - 6

- Occupationa l 3.4*1 0 - 4 4.1*1 0 - 3 No t Calculate d

a 

### Dat a fro

manalysi s use d i n "Draf t RI A. . . Propose d .
.. . Standard s ..." , EPA-450/3-87-001a , Jul y1987 . . Refueling b

### Number s calculate d using th e following uni t ris k factors : Benzene : 2.6*10~ 2 

### and , th e Plausibl e Uppe r Limi t (Rat ) fo r Tota l Gasolin e Vapors : 3.1*10** 3 

### . c 

### Controlle d b

y3 5 mg/ l vapo r processo r a t bul k terminals , tank truc k an

d storag e tank vapo r balancing a t bul k plant s an d servic e stations , an

d onboar d vehicl e refueling control s a t servic e stations .
3.808 Solicitation provision and contract clause. ( a ) Insert the provision at 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions, in solicitations expected to exceed $150,000.
( b ) Insert the clause at 52.203-12, Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions, in solicitations and contracts expected to exceed $150,000.
[72 FR 46330, Aug. 17, 2007, as amended at 75 FR 53132, Aug. 30, 2010]
# C_2017334EN.01000101.xml

| 6.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 October 2017

(2017/C 334/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1742 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4424 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89153 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5195 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1472 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,837 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,42 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3000 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5750 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1905 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5015 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4655 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1701 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6413 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5998 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0020 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8108 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5055 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 803,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9651 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,949 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,5273 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,160 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6772 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4107 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,4965 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1742

JPY

Japanese yen

132,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4424

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89153

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5195

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1472

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,837

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,42

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3000

RON

Romanian leu

4,5750

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1905

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5015

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4655

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1701

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6413

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5998

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,65

ZAR

South African rand

16,0020

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8108

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5055

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 803,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9651

PHP

Philippine peso

59,949

RUB

Russian rouble

67,5273

THB

Thai baht

39,160

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6772

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4107

INR

Indian rupee

76,4965

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit
10.1


 


SUMMARY
OF THE COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT FOR


TIMOTHY
K. ARMOUR


THE
COMPANY’S INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


 


	
  Annual Base Salary Rate:

  	
   

  	
  $500,000, payable semi-monthly

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Cash Bonus Incentive Target:

  	
   

  	
  $2,500,000* #

  



 


Each of the above amounts will be prorated based on the time Mr. Timothy
K. Armour serves as Interim Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) for Janus Capital
Group Inc. (the “Company”).  While he
serves as Interim CEO, Mr. Armour is also entitled to all welfare and
retirement benefits offered to other senior executives of the Company, and the
Company is providing temporary housing. 
The Company will also continue Mr. Armour’s medical, dental and
vision benefits for a period of five years following his service as Interim
CEO.


 






*  The actual cash bonus payment
may be less than or greater than the target amount and will be prorated based
on the time Mr. Armour serves as Interim CEO.  The cash bonus payment is subject to approval
by the Compensation Committee and is subject to achievement of performance criteria
established by the Compensation Committee in compliance with Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code.


 


#  On July 24, 2009, Mr. Armour
was also granted an immediately vested restricted stock unit award in the
amount of $500,000 (39,155 shares) under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2004
Employment Inducement Award Plan.  This
award was previously announced with a press release on August 6, 2009, in
accordance with the New York Stock Exchange rules.
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: June 3, 2010 | /S/ JAMES P. FOGARTY     |
|---------------------|--------------------------|
|                | James P. Fogarty         |
|                | President                |
|                | Chief Executive Officer  |
|                |                     |
| Dated: June 3, 2010 | /S/ ERIC M. SPECTER      |
|                | Eric M. Specter          |
|                | Executive Vice President |
|                | Chief Financial Officer  |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the report), I, Xiao Ping Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)   or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   Registrant.

|Dated this 16th day of June, 2006. | By: | /s/Xiao Ping Zhang     
|---------------------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                                   |     |                        
|                                   |     | Xiao Ping Zhang        
|                                   |     | Chief Executive Officer
|                                   |     |                        

---
**Division Director:**Vicki Robinson, Ed.D., 202-453-7907 

**Program Lead:**Ashley Hillary, MCRP, (202) 453-7880

**Program Co-Lead:**Kelly Harris, 202-453-7346

**Program Officers:**

| **PROGRAM OFFICER**  | **DIRECT NUMBER** | **ASSIGNED STATES**                |
|----------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------|
| Kelly Harris, M.Ed.  | (202) 453-7346    | AL, AR, GA                         |
| Ashley Hillary, MCRP | (202) 453-7880    | IL, MS, NC, NJ, NY, PA, SC, TN, TX |

**Mailing Address:**U.S. Department of Education, OPEHigher Education Programs, Institutional ServicePredominantly Black Institutions Program - Competitive Grants400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Mail Stop:  LBJ-HEP-2C206Washington, DC 20202

Institutional Service Home
#### 2901.602 Contracting officers.
#### H. KOEHLER & CO., Respondents, v. BRADY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by H. Koehler & Co. against James W. Brady and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Modified.

See 81 N. Y. Supp. 695.

Moses Weinman, for appellants.

Emanual J. Myers, for respondents.

INGRAHAM, J.

A statement of the proceeding which has resulted in this judgment, and the nature of the judgment, are stated in a former appeal in this action. 82 App. Div. 279, 81 N. Y. Supp. 695. Entertaining the views there expressed, it is quite apparent that a judgment, so far as it affects appellant Doelger or directs a sale of his property, was unauthorized, and that for the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment, so far as it affects appellant Doelger, should be reversed, and all provisions in the judgment by which it is adjudged that the plaintiffs acquire a lien upon the premises described in the complaint and directing a sale of the property, should be stricken from the judgment appealed from, with costs to the said appellant against the respondents.
*Note:  These Congressional Budget Justifications do not include State tables. For the latest State tables, please visit the Department's State Tables page*.

### Volume I

- ESEA Overview download files PDF (78KB)
- Accelerating Achievement and Ensuring Equity download files PDF (1.4MB)
- School Readiness download files PDF (1.4MB)
- Impact Aid download files  PDF (1.2MB)
- Education Improvement Programs download files PDF (2.0MB)
- Supporting Student Success download files PDF (2.0MB)
- Indian Student Education download files PDF (1.2MB)  )
- Innovation and Instructional Teams download files PDF (1.9MB)
- English Learner Education download files PDF (622KB)
- Special Education download files PDF (1.6MB)
- Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research download files PDF (1.9MB)

### Volume II

- American Printing House for the Blind download files PDF (73KB)
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf download files PDF (172KB)
- Gallaudet University download files PDF (228KB)
- Career, Technical, and Adult Education download files PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Overview download files PDF (232KB)
- Student Financial Assistance download files PDF (1.8MB)
- TEACH Grants download files PDF (1.0MB)
- Student Loans Overview download files PDF (1.2MB)
- Higher Education download files PDF (2.7MB)
- Howard University download files PDF (222KB)
- College Housing and Academic Facilities Loans Program Account download files PDF (162KB)
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program Account download files PDF (301KB)
- Institute of Education Sciences download files PDF (675KB)
- Salaries and Expenses Overview download files PDF (553KB)
- Program Administration download files PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Administration download files PDF (1.4MB)
- Office for Civil Rights download files PDF (474KB)
- Office of Inspector General download files PDF (343KB)

|Last Modified: 03/05/2014
|-------------------------
Case: 1:12-cv-05147 Document #: 3 Filed: 06/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:32
#### Anna Ransome, Appellant, v. Bull Markets, Inc., Respondent.

Hamm, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a dismissal of her complaint and a directed verdict in favor of the defendant at the close of all of the evidence. The defendant has admitted in its answer that it maintained a store for the sale of food, household products and other merchandise and further that adjoining the store building it maintained a parking area for the use of its patrons and other invitees. To reach the parking area automobilists were required to drive over *720the sidewalk. The plaintiff’s theory was that a hazardous situation was created on the public sidewalk by its being traversed by automobiles and that the defendant should be held liable since the defendant’s invitees in proceeding from the street over the sidewalk onto the defendant’s parking lot acted pursuant to the defendant’s invitation and the defendant, by its invitation, created a dangerous condition which interfered with the lawful use of the sidewalk. On this appeal the plaintiff does not contend that she fell on the defendant’s premises but rather on the portion of the public sidewalk which automobilists customarily used to reach the defendant’s parking lot. She alleges specifically in her complaint that her accident took place on the public sidewalk and, in order to recover, she must prove that the accident occurred on the public sidewalk as she alleged. A party must recover not only according to the proof but also according to the pleadings *(Hekand*v. *Stockhammer,*5 N Y 2d 877; *Rosner*v. *United States Waterways Corp.,*278 App. Div. 168, 170, affd. 304 N. Y. 580). The only eyewitness was the plaintiff herself. The plaintiff gave testimony indicating that she fell on the public sidewalk. But on other occasions her testimony indicated that she fell on the defendant’s parking lot. For instance, on the defendant’s Exhibit A, a map of the vicinity, she placed an X and surrounded it with a circle to indicate the place of her fall. These designating marks were beyond the public sidewalk and within the defendant’s parking area. In deciding the issue whether the plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to make out a prima facie case authorizing submission to the jury, we are guided by the rule that the facts adduced at the trial are to be considered in the aspect most favorable to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of any favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn from those facts *(Sagorsky*v. *Malyon,*307 N. Y. 584, 586). However, to have submitted this case to the jury would have required the jury, as the trial court said, to speculate as to where the accident happened and a verdict in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily have been based on pure speculation. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

R.Q. WARD, J.R. MCFARLANE, G.G. GERDING

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

EVAN W. STEELE

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400029

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 30 September 2013.

Military Judge: Col Michael Richardson, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Headquarters and 

Support Battalion, School of Infantry (WEST), Camp 

Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol M.E. Sayegh, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CDR Suzanne Lachelier, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

29 May 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 10(p)

                                TERM SHEET
                                    for
                             CHARLES F. MARCY
                        CEO OF SEALRIGHT CO., INC.


1.   Position
         President and CEO

         Board of Directors

2.   Cash Compensation
         $50,000 initial payment

         $300,000 annual base salary

         $150,000 guaranteed bonus through December 31, 1996,
          pro rated for 1995; Bonus Plan could be a maximum of
          75% of base salary if objectives are met

3.   Stock Options/Stock Bonus
         Options for 100,000 shares, to be divided between
          incentive stock options (maximum allowed) and non-
          qualified options, vesting over 5 years from date of
          grant and exercisable for 10 years; all these options
          will best upon a change of control of Sealright

         Participation in Stock Bonus Plan when adopted

4.   Fringe Benefits
         Golf club membership

         Automobile

         Tax return preparation

         Annual physical

         4 weeks of vacation

         All other benefits available to executive officers

5.   Relocation Package
         All benefits under Sealright's policy

         Sealright will reimburse any loss on present home up to
          $75,000 (grossed up for taxes)

6.   Severance Package
         Upon termination by Company, payment of 24 months'
          salary

     A separate non-disclosure/non-compete agreement will be
required.