alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 227.7001 Policy.

Whenever a claim of infringement of privately owned rights in patented inventions or copyrighted works is asserted against any Department or Agency of the Department of Defense, all necessary steps shall be taken to investigate, and to settle administratively, deny, or otherwise dispose of such claim prior to suit against the United States. This subpart 227.70 does not apply to licenses or assignments acquired by the Department of Defense under the Patent Rights clauses.
Exhibit
10.(a)


 


[Sutherland Asbill and Brennan LLP letterhead]


 


STEPHEN E. ROTH


DIRECT LINE: 202.383.0158


Internet:
steve.roth@sutherland.com


 


October 28, 2009


 


Board of Directors


Protective Life Insurance Company


2801 Highway 201 South


Birmingham, Alabama 35223


Directors:


 


We hereby consent to the reference to our
name under the caption “Legal Matters” in the statement of additional
information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 15 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-113070) filed by
Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate
Account with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  In giving this consent, we do not admit that
we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7
of the Securities Act of 1933.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Stephen E. Roth

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Stephen E. Roth
SCPW-22-0000320

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STEFANIE B. HILDRETH, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE MICHELLE L. DREWYER,

Judge of the Family Court of the Second Circuit,

State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(FC-M NO. 22-1-0058)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRITS OF PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Stefanie B. Hildreth’s

petition for writs of prohibition and mandamus, filed on May 4,

2022, the documents attached and submitted in support, and the

record, petitioner fails to demonstrate she has a clear and

indisputable right to relief or that she lacks alternative means

to seek relief. It also cannot be said that the respondent judge

exceeded her jurisdiction, committed a flagrant and manifest

abuse of discretion, or refused to act on a matter properly

before the court under circumstances in which the judge has a

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-22-0000320

25-MAY-2022

10:19 AM

Dkt. 17 ODDP
legal duty to act. Petitioner is thus not entitled to the

requested extraordinary writs. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i

200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (explaining that a writ of

mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless

the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to

relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the

alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; such a writ is

meant to restrain a judge who has exceeded the judge’s

jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of

discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before

the court under circumstances in which the judge has a legal duty

to act); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241,

580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of prohibition “is an

extraordinary remedy . . . to restrain a judge of an inferior

court from acting beyond or in excess of his [or her]

jurisdiction”). Accordingly, 

It is ordered that the petition for writs of

prohibition and mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 25, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
Motion Denied as Moot and Order filed December 18, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00464-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.C.L. AND M.W.L., CHILDREN

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16-FD-2240

ORDER

This is an appeal from an order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. 

The order concerns mother/petitioner/appellee R.E.E., father/respondent/appellant 

C.N.L., their two sons, and the Attorney General of Texas. In its notice of assignment 

of the appeal to this court, the Galveston County District Clerk identified Carlos 

Garza, as attorney for Andrew Ross, as an “Interested Party.” This court accordingly 

designated Garza as a person who would receive all notices from the court regarding 

this appeal. Ross is not designated as a party in this court’s records.

On November 29, 2018, Garza filed a “Motion for Dismissal of Andrew Ross 

as Appellee.” The motion states the district court erroneously designated Garza and 
2

Ross as interested parties and neither Garza nor Ross were involved in the underlying 

case (No. 16-FD-2240). Instead, Ross, represented by Garza, was a party in a related 

case, No. 16-FD-2242. No appeal is pending from the related case.

Because Ross has not been designated as an appellee in this court, we DENY 

AS MOOT his motion to dismiss. We will no longer send Garza notices regarding 

this case.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell
#### 233.171 Reporting requirement for protests of solicitations or awards.

Follow the procedures at PGI 233.171 for reporting information on protests involving the same contract award or proposed award that have been filed at both the GAO and the United States Court of Federal Claims.

[84 FR 25194, May 31, 2019, as amended at 87 FR 15811, Mar. 18, 2022]
PUBLIC LAW 111–165—MAY 14, 2010 124 STAT. 1185 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5146 (S. 3244): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Apr. 27, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–165 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To provide that Members of Congress shall not receive a cost of living adjustment 

in pay during fiscal year 2011 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NO COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT IN PAY OF MEMBERS 

OF CONGRESS. 

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no adjustment 

shall be made under section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization 

Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) (relating to cost of living adjustments 

for Members of Congress) during fiscal year 2011. 

Approved May 14, 2010. 

2 USC 31 note. 

May 14, 2010 

[H.R. 5146] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
PUBLIC LAW 111–180—JUNE 9, 2010 124 STAT. 1265 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3634: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 155 (2009): Dec. 1, 2, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 156 (2010): May 25, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–180 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 109 Main 

Street in Swifton, Arkansas, as the ‘‘George Kell Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. GEORGE KELL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 109 Main Street in Swifton, Arkansas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘George Kell Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘George Kell Post Office’’. 

Approved June 9, 2010. 

June 9, 2010 

[H.R. 3634] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00274

- CR

Allen F. Calton

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (0843168D)

Jan uary 7, 2016

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is order ed that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 333 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 333

   Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares 
 during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2017

   Mr. Isakson (for himself and Mr. Tester) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares 
 during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND HOUSEWARES DURING 
              THE HOLIDAY SEASON FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 
              BUILDINGS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules 
or regulations of the Senate--
            (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may collect from another Senator, officer of the Senate, 
        or employee of the Senate within Senate buildings nonmonetary 
        donations of clothing, toys, food, and housewares for 
        charitable purposes related to serving persons in need or 
        members of the Armed Forces and the families of those members 
        during the holiday season, if the charitable purposes do not 
        otherwise violate any rule or regulation of the Senate or of 
        Federal law; and
            (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may work with a nonprofit organization with respect to 
        the delivery of donations described under paragraph (1).
    (b) Expiration.--The authority provided by this resolution shall 
expire at the end of the first session of the 115th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
#### Marguerite Riberdy, Plaintiff, v. Denby Stores, Inc., Appellant, and Otis Elevator Company, Respondent.

Motion to resettle order denied, without costs. In our view, and in our long standing and invariable practice as well, our award of costs in this court includes disbursements upon the appeal. (Cf. Civ Prae. Act, § 1518; *Matter of Hughes,*231 App. Div. 770; *Webster*v. *Roe,*126 Mise. 792.) Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
## Timeline

**Current Competition: FY 2023**Funding Opportunity Number: ED-GRANTS-041823-003Application Available: April 18, 2023Application Deadline: June 20, 2023 at 11:59:59 PM, Washington, DC Time

## Federal Register Notice

- Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for FY 2023 | PDFCurrent Application
Applications for the FY 2023 Rural Postsecondary & Economic Development (RPED) Program are now available on https://www.grants.gov/. **All applicants are required to submit an application online through Grants.gov.** Grants.gov is a single access point for over 1,000 grant programs offered by federal and other grant-making agencies.

Through Grants.gov you will be able to download a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit your application. You must search for the downloadable application package for this program by the **ALN 84.116W or the Funding Opportunity Number.**

If you experience problems submitting your application through Grants.gov, refer to the Support page and/or contact the Grants.gov Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726.If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to one of the program contact persons listed below.
- 84.116W FY 2023 RPED Program Application Booklet    PDF  (829K)

**TO APPLY:**

The FY 2023 Rural Postsecondary & Economic Development program application is available until June 20, 2023, via the Grants.gov website at www.grants.gov under Opportunity Number ED-GRANTS-041823-003.
Tips and Assistance
Please follow the guidance published in the *Federal Register* Notice here and the application instructions in Grants.gov.

Click here for the FY 2023 RPED Program Technical Assistance Webinar Schedule 

Click here for the FY 2023 RPED Program Technical Assistance Webinar Slides
Application Contact
Main Email: rped@ed.gov

Kurrinn Abrams, Program Lead and Competition ManagerKurrinn.Abrams2@ed.gov | (202) 987-1920
FIPSE Home
  Last Modified: 06/06/2023
**Exhibit 99-1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Equity Oil Company (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul M. Dougan, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002,to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

 

(1)                                  Thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Paul M. Dougan                                                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul  M. Dougan, President  Chief Executive Officer  May 9, 2003 |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Equity Oil Company (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Russell V. Florence,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

 

(1)                                  Thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Russell V. Florence                                               |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Russell V.  Florence  Treasurer  Chief Financial Officer  May 9, 2003 |

 

----
# TCU 9-19-2008
Case: 1:12-cr-00528 Document #: 143 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:797
Case: 1:12-cr-00528 Document #: 143 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:798
Case: 1:12-cr-00528 Document #: 143 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:799
Case: 1:12-cr-00528 Document #: 143 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:800
Case: 1:12-cr-00528 Document #: 143 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:801
Case: 1:12-cr-00528 Document #: 143 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:802
Case: 1:12-cr-00528 Document #: 143 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:803
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cybrdi Inc. (We") for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yonghong Ren, the principal financial
officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof us

Date: August 19, 2011

/s/ Yonghong Ren
Name: Yonghong Ren, 
Principal Financial Officer

---
# C_2017321EN.01000701.xml

| 28.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2017/C 321/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national side features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : The Principality of Andorra

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Andorra — The Pyrenean country

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design reproduces on its upper part a triangle, consisting of three undulating strips representing a simplified version of the map of the country, with the inscriptions ‘Andorra’ and ‘EL PAÍS DELS PIRINEUS’ (the Pyrenean country).

Description of the design

These three elements make up the brand owned by the Government of Andorra, which is used to provide a uniform, consistent and coordinated image to all graphic communication and, at the same time, achieve an unmistakable and instant identification.

The lower part of the design depicts the year of issuance ‘2017’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : December 2017

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted **

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                December 5, 2005 | **/S/****DORRIT                J. BERN**             |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Dorrit                J. Bern                        |
|                                   | Chairman                of the Board                 |
|                                   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                                 |
|                                   |                                                 |
| Dated:                December 5, 2005 | **/S/****ERIC                M. SPECTER**            |
|                                   | Eric                M. Specter                       |
|                                   | Executive                Vice President              |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer               |
Deny and Opinion Filed August 30, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-21-00730-CV

IN RE LANDELL SHECKLES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-08491

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pe dersen, III, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Goldstein

In his August 25, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus, rela tor challenges the

trial court’s failure to comply with re lator’s request to rule on his motion for

default judgment in his original petition for divorce. Entitlement to mandamus

relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and

that he lacks an adequa te appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d

124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).Based on our review of the petition, we conclude that relator has failed to

demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ

of mandamus.

210730F.P05 /Bonnie Lee Goldstein / BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
#### 252.211-7000--252.211-7001 [Reserved]