alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,480<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,401
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         109,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         85,646
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,883
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,248
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   854
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
<FN>
<F1>Includes $918 of restricted cash.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017087EN.01001001.xml

| 21.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/10

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 March 2017

(2017/C 87/09)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0752 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4346 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86793 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5078 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0720 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1278 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,64 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2820 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5605 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9067 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3922 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4359 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3497 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5271 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5030 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 199,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,6292 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4268 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4055 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 314,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7594 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,826 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,8563 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,336 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3416 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5514 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,2805 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0752

JPY

Japanese yen

121,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4346

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86793

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5078

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0720

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1278

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,64

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2820

RON

Romanian leu

4,5605

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9067

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3922

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4359

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3497

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5271

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5030

KRW

South Korean won

1 199,56

ZAR

South African rand

13,6292

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4268

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4055

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 314,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7594

PHP

Philippine peso

53,826

RUB

Russian rouble

61,8563

THB

Thai baht

37,336

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3416

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5514

INR

Indian rupee

70,2805

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-1072

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM141AD

601R-32-109 --- 5/29/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### 2409.470 HUD regulations on debarment, suspension, and ineligibility.

HUD's policies and procedures concerning debarment and suspension are contained in 2 CFR part 2424, and, notwithstanding any language to the contrary, apply to procurement contracts.

[78 FR 49698, Aug. 15, 2013]
Case: 1:12-cv-02391 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/30/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:33
#### 24.101 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Agency* means any executive department, military department, Government corporation, Government controlled corporation, or other establishment in the executive branch of the Government (including the Executive Office of the President), or any independent regulatory agency.

*Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

*Maintain* means maintain, collect, use, or disseminate.

*Operation of a system of records* means performance of any of the activities associated with maintaining the system of records, including the collection, use, and dissemination of records.

*Personally identifiable information* means information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual's identity, either alone or when combined with other information that is linked or linkable to a specific individual. (See Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-130, Managing Federal Information as a Strategic Resource).

*Record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history, and that contains the individual's name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a fingerprint or voiceprint or a photograph.

*System of records on individuals* means a group of any records under the control of any agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.

[48 FR 42277, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2130, Jan. 10, 2001; 81 FR 93480, Dec. 20, 2016]
#### Thomas Petrella, Appellant, v. Stephen E. Gruber et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 12, 1963, which denied his motion for leave to amend his bill of particulars so as to allege (1) additional physical injuries; and (2) loss of earnings. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements *(Handschu*v. *Welts,*13 A D 2d 679), Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ,, concur.
### -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74
38 39 40 41



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/17 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### 22.1002-2 Wage determinations based on prevailing rates.

Contractors performing on service contracts in excess of $2,500 to which no predecessor contractor's collective bargaining agreement applies shall pay their employees at least the wages and fringe benefits found by the Department of Labor to prevail in the locality or, in the absence of a wage determination, the minimum wage set forth in the Fair Labor Standards Act.
(June 17, 1964)

#### Samuel R. Hopkins, Respondent, v. Long Island Rail Road Company, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 11, 1964 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed, without costs. Findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict are affirmed. Plaintiff was an employee, not of this *815defendant, but of the Pennsylvania Railroad. He was riding upon defendant’s railroad on a free pass issued to him, not as part of his contract of employment, but merely as a gratuity. The reverse side of the pass contained the following condition: “ The person accepting and using [the pass] thereby assumes all risk of accident to person or property”. Plaintiff admitted knowledge of such condition. Plaintiff was injured as a result of the ordinary negligence of defendant. In our opinion, the pass by its expressly stated condition barred plaintiff’s recovery based on the defendant’s ordinary negligence, despite the fact that the stated condition did not contain a clause specifically exculpating defendant from liability “ by reason of negligence” *(Kansas City. So. Ry.*v. *Van Zant,*260 U. S. 459; *Quimby*v. *Boston & Maine R. R. Co.,*150 Mass. 365; *Rogers*v. *Kennebec Steamboat Co.,*86 Me. 261). We are also of the opinion that, even in the absence of the said stipulation or condition in the pass that plaintiff “assumes all risk of accident,” there would be no liability in any event on the part of defendant here. When plaintiff used the pass given to him as a gratuity, plaintiff was not a “passenger” on defendant’s railroad, but a mere licensee; and hence, as to the plaintiff, the defendant was not a common carrier *(Northern Pacific Ry. Co.*v. *Adams,*192 U. S. 440, 453; *Bergerson*v. *Great Northern Ry. Co.,*158 Minn. 20). To a licensee the defendant owed the duty only of abstaining from affirmative acts of negligence or of not injuring him intentionally *(Mayer*v. *Temple Props.,*307 N. Y. 559). No breach of such duty is claimed here. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Catherine Gronski, Respondent, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator which denied the petitioner’s application for a certificate of eviction, the Administrator appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, made May 7, 1964 upon reargument, which annulled the determination and which directed issuance of the certificate; and (2) from an order of said court, made June 29, 1964 again upon reargument, which adhered to the original decision. Appeal from order of May 7, 1964 dismissed as academic, without costs. Such order was superseded by the subsequent order of June 29, 1964, granting reargument. Order of June 29, 1964 reversed on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs. The findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion, the Administrator’s determination had a reasonable basis and therefore should not have been annulled (see *Matter of Friedman*v. *Weaver,*3 N Y 2d 123; *Matter of Link*v. *Caputa,*10 A D 2d 882). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### 246.408 Single-agency assignments of Government contract quality assurance.
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 73 Filed: 01/07/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:826
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 73 Filed: 01/07/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:827
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 73 Filed: 01/07/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:828
# C_2017278EN.01000301.xml

| 22.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 August 2017

(2017/C 278/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1761 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4373 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91318 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5173 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1362 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2903 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,086 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2738 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5849 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,1243 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4831 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4815 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2015 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6072 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6024 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 339,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5304 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8462 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4053 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 703,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0449 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,474 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,4996 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,111 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7042 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8321 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,4385 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1761

JPY

Japanese yen

128,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4373

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91318

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5173

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1362

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2903

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,086

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2738

RON

Romanian leu

4,5849

TRY

Turkish lira

4,1243

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4831

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4815

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2015

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6072

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6024

KRW

South Korean won

1 339,54

ZAR

South African rand

15,5304

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8462

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4053

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 703,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0449

PHP

Philippine peso

60,474

RUB

Russian rouble

69,4996

THB

Thai baht

39,111

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7042

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8321

INR

Indian rupee

75,4385

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40853 Summary Calendar

MICHAEL HABINIAK,

Plaintiff

–

Appellant

v.

MNB VENTURES, INCORPORATED, each in their individual capacity; TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, each in their individual capacity; HERIBERTO ALANIS, each in their individual capacity; HECTOR GUERRA, SR., each in their individual capacity; HECTOR GUERRA, JR., each in thei r individual capacity; CANDELARIO ONTIVEROS, each in their individual capacity; JOE QUIROGA, each in their individual capacity; ABEL RODRIGUEZ, each in their individual capacity; ATLAS, HALL & RODRIGUEZ, L.L.P., each in their individual capacity; KITTLEMAN THOMAS LAW FIRM, each in their individual capacity; C. WESLEY KITTLEMAN, each in their individual capacity; CARLOS M. YZAGUIRRE, each in their individual capacity; GUERRA LAW GROUP, each in their individual capacity; CARLOS L. GUERRA, each in their indivi dual capacity; DAVID J. LUMBER, each in their individual capacity; MARIO E. RAMIREZ, JR., each in their individual capacity; JAMES P. GRISSOM, each in their individual capacity; WILLIAM A. CSABI, each in their individual capacity; DAVID J. BRADLEY, each in their individual capacity; MICAELA ALVAREZ, each in their individual capacity; MISSY MEDARY, each in their individual capacity; LAURA HINOJOSA, each in their individual capacity; CHARLES MURRAY, each in their individual capacity; RANDY CRANE, U.S. Distric t Judge, each in their individual capacity,

Defendants

– Appellees United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
February 25, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk Case: 18-40853 Document: 00514849734 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2019No. 18

- 40853

2 Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:17

- CV

- 343

Before SMITH

, WIENER

, and WILLETT , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except u nder the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-40853 Document: 00514849734 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains Summary Financial Information extracted from the
Quarterly Report for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 of Carrols
Corporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statement.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      $1,457,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 $510,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 $2,306,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $9,375,000
<PP&E>                                    $121,667,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             $61,962,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            $139,725,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      $18,870,000
<BONDS>                                   $122,699,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           $10
<OTHER-SE>                               $(10,105,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              $139,725,000
<SALES>                                   $177,638,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          $177,824,000
<CGS>                                      $50,333,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             $147,363,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         $10,635,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $3,770,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                $1,900,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $1,870,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $1,870,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1 ANDR É J. TAYLOR

,

Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT

ASSI STANCE APPEALS

COMMISSION and CITICORP
CREDIT SERVICES, INC.

,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3821

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 7, 2016.

An appeal from Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

. Frank E. Brown, Chairman , Judge

.

Andr é Taylor, pro se , Appellant.

Norman A. Bless ing, General Counsel, Katie E. Sabo, Appellate Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee , for Appellee Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, THOMAS

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:331

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:332

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:333

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:334

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:335

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:336

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:337

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:338

Case: 1:12-cv-05811 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:339
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Burroughs, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on February 28, 1977, unanimously affirmed. Appellant has been afforded ample time in which to file a supplemental brief, but has failed to avail himself of that opportunity. No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Sandler, Lane and Markewich, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-29-1997
<CASH>                                     20,939
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              24,303
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                44,159
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           90,013
<PP&E>                                     170,794
<DEPRECIATION>                             71,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             195,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      46,029
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   188
<OTHER-SE>                                 77,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               195,499
<SALES>                                    143,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           143,158
<CGS>                                      122,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              122,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            3,878
<INCOME-TAX>                               1,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        2,507
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,507
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .19
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our
report dated December 4, 1998, except with respect to the restatement discussed
in Note 1 and Note 3 as to which the date is July 28, 2000 included in
Registration Statement File No. 0-14365 in this Form 10-K. It should be noted
that we have not audited any financial statements of the company subsequent to
October 25, 1998 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our
report.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
-------------------------
Houston, Texas
January 29, 2001