alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1154
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 2 of 15 PageID #:1155
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 3 of 15 PageID #:1156
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 4 of 15 PageID #:1157
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 5 of 15 PageID #:1158
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 6 of 15 PageID #:1159
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 7 of 15 PageID #:1160
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 8 of 15 PageID #:1161
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 9 of 15 PageID #:1162
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 10 of 15 PageID #:1163
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 11 of 15 PageID #:1164
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 12 of 15 PageID #:1165
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 13 of 15 PageID #:1166
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 14 of 15 PageID #:1167
Case: 1:12-cv-05190 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 15 of 15 PageID #:1168
201.101 Purpose. ( 1 ) The defense acquisition system, as defined in 10 U.S.C. 3001(a), exists to manage the investments of the United States in technologies, programs, and product support necessary to achieve the national security strategy prescribed by the President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043) and to support the United States Armed Forces.
( 2 ) The investment strategy of DoD shall be postured to support not only the current United States armed forces, but also future armed forces of the United States.
( 3 ) The primary objective of DoD acquisition is to acquire quality supplies and services that satisfy user needs with measurable improvements to mission capability and operational support at a fair and reasonable price.
[83 FR 19641, May 4, 2018, as amended at 87 FR 76989, Dec. 16, 2022]
# C_2016459EN.01000101.xml

| 9.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8046 — TUI/Transat France)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 459/01)

On 20 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8046. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8046. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit
22.1





PHOTOMEDEX,
INC.


a
Delaware corporation





LIST OF
SUBSIDIARIES


(as of
December 31, 2008)





Surgical
Laser Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation. *





Surgical
Innovations & Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation*





SLT
Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation





ProCyte
Corporation, a Washington corporation





Next
Derm, Inc., a Washington corporation **





SLT
Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation**





SLT
Rentals, Inc., a Delaware corporation**





Diversified
Properties and Equity Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation**





Laser
Analytics, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation**





Laser
Photonics, Inc., a Delaware corporation**





* Merged
into PhotoMedex, Inc. on November 18, 2004.




**
Inactive.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:12-CV-02392

ANTHONY SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v.

BLATT, HASENMILLER, 

LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

NOW COMES counsel for Plaintiff, WEISBERG & MEYERS, LLC (“W&M”), 

and hereby moves this Honorable Court to grant Weisberg & Meyers, LLC, leave to 

withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff, ANTHONY SMITH. In support thereof, Weisberg & 

Meyers, LLC, states as follows:

1. W&M represents Plaintiff, Anthony Smith, in this matter, as well as another 

similar case for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

2. On no fewer than five (5) occasions, Mr. Weisberg has attempted to contact 

Plaintiff via telephone and email with regard to both cases; however he has refused to 

return Mr. Weisberg’s calls or emails. 

3. Furthermore, on April 2, 2012, Mr. Weisberg sent Plaintiff a letter requesting a 

return phone call to Mr. Weisberg directly, or W&M would have no choice but to close 

Plaintiff’s file; W&M has not received any return phone call or other response to the 

letter. (See April 2, 2012, correspondence, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”). 

Case: 1:12-cv-02392 Document #: 3 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:12
4. Based on Plaintiff’s refusal to cooperate and communicate with his attorneys, 

W&M is unable to continue representing the Plaintiff in regard to this action.

WHEREFORE, Weisberg & Meyers, LLC respectfully requests that this 

Honorable Court grant it leave to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter, and for 

such other and further relief as this Court deems appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

WEISBERG & MEYERS, LLC

By:_________________________

 Alex Weisberg

ALEX D. WEISBERG

FBN: 0566551

WEISBERG & MEYERS, LLC

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

5722 S. Flamingo Road, Ste. 656

Cooper City, FL 33330

(954) 212-2184

(866) 577-0963 fax

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, Alex D. Weisberg, attorney for Plaintiff, certify that a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing was served upon Mr. Anthony Smith, 1701 State Street, Suite 1E, Calumet 

City, IL 60409, and Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC, 125 S. Wacker Dr., 

Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60606 by depositing the same on April ______, 2012, in the U.S. 

Mail.

By:__________________________

Alex D. Weisberg

Case: 1:12-cv-02392 Document #: 3 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:13
CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH CONFERENCE

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I attempted to confer in good faith with counsel for 

Defendant regarding the issues raised in this motion but was unsuccessful in doing so.

By: s/ Alex Weisberg 

 ALEX D. WEISBERG

Case: 1:12-cv-02392 Document #: 3 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:14
# C_2017087EN.01000602.xml

| 21.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8343 — Dong Energy/Macquarie/Swancor/Formosa 1 Wind Power)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 87/05)

On 28 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8343. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8343. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Memorandum

To: U.S. Department of Education and Negotiated Rulemaking Committee

From: Amanda Martinez and Ernest Ezeugo

Date: March 17, 2022

Re: Proposed Transcript Withholding Language 

The Department’s recent Issue Paper 6: Certification Procedures attempts to address the burden 

and educational barrier transcript withholdings inflicts on primarily first-generation students and 

students from low-income backgrounds. We appreciate the Department of Education’s tacit 

acknowledgement of their authority to act on this issue. That said, the current language found in 

§ 668.14 subpart (33) limits action to a specific scenario that fails to capture the common 

experiences of students with a transcript hold.

It is our opinion that a ban on transcript withholding as a debt collection practice is the ideal way 

to correct this issue. We acknowledge, but ultimately reject, the idea that transcript withholding 

is a necessary debt collection tool to keep low-income students’ unpaid balances from 

immediately being sent to collections. Pilot programs in Ohio and Maryland how that institutions 

are committed to addressing this problem in ways that change circumstances for low-income 

students.1 Laws banning the practice of transcript withholding in California and Washington 

show that the scope of this problem is significant and deserving of meaningful action.2

As the negotiators representing students, student borrowers, and civil rights organizations, we 

recommend that the Department reconsider the language offered by negotiators Carolyn Fast, 

Jaylon Herbin, Adam Welle, Yael Shavit, and Deborah Cochrane, prior to the second session of 

this negotiated rulemaking. The Department’s Session 4 language found in § 668.14 Program 

Participation Agreements would be as follows:

“(b) By entering into a program participation agreement, an institution agrees that—

***

(33) It will not use transcript issuance as a tool for debt collection by, inter alia

1 See: https://sr.ithaka.org/blog/a-sustainable-solution-to-settle-students-debt-and-release-stranded-credits/. Also see: 

https://undergraduate.umbc.edu/finishline/

2 See: California law, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB1313. Also 

see: Washington law, https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=28A.195.070.
(i) Refusing to provide a transcript for a current or former student on the grounds that the

student owes a debt to the institution or any other party;

(ii) Conditioning the provision of a transcript on the payment of a debt to the institution

or any other party, other than a fee charged to provide the transcript; or

(iii) Charging a higher fee for obtaining a transcript, or providing less favorable

treatment of a transcript request because a student owes a debt to the institution or any 

other

party.”
#### 227.7011 Procurement of rights in inventions, patents, and copyrights.

Even though no infringement has occurred or been alleged, it is the policy of the Department of Defense to procure rights under patents, patent applications, and copyrights whenever it is in the Government's interest to do so and the desired rights can be obtained at a fair price. The required and suggested clauses at 252.227-7004 and 252.227-7010 shall be required and suggested clauses, respectively, for license agreements and assignments made under this paragraph. The instructions at 227.7009-3 and 227.7010 concerning the applicability and use of those clauses shall be followed insofar as they are pertinent.
#### 252.247-7017--252.247-7021 [Reserved]
- Postsecondary Degree Completion Rates Among Students on the Upward Bound/Upward Bound Math-Science to Student Support Services Pathway PDF (957KB)
- Fast Facts Report for the Student Support Services Program  PDF (302K)
- Persistence and Completion in Postsecondary Education of Participants in the TRIO Student Support Services Program  MS Word (920K) | PDF (813K)
- National Evaluation of Student Support Services: Examination of Student Outcomes After Six Years (2010) compares the educational outcomes of Student Support Services (SSS) program participants and non-SSS program participants six years after enrolling in college as first-year students.
Full Report 
PDF
 (1.97MB) 

- Student Service Organization
- Program Specialists
- Current Low-Income Levels  
Prior-Year Low-Income Levels
    
A Profile of the Federal TRIO Programs and Child Care Access Means Parents in School Program:  2008 MS Word (446K) | PDF (267K)
  
Program Profiles
- An Interim Report on the Student Support Services Program: 2002-03 and 2003-04, With Select Data From 1998-2002  MS Word (3.2MB) | PDF (541K)
- A Profile of the Student Support Services Program: 1998-1999 Through 2001-2002 MS Word (1.04 MB) | PDF (770K)
- A Profile of the Student Support Services Program:  1997-99 MS Word (1.9 MB) | PDF (706K)
  
The office of Federal TRIO Programs partnered with the Educational Credit Management Corporation (ECMC) Foundation to distribute ***Realizing the College Dream***, a guide that supports teachers, counselors, and community-based organization staffs in their work to increase the expectations of attending college by low-income, first-generation college students and their families. A free copy of the guide can be downloaded on the ECMC Educator resources page.
  
Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE): Applicant and Grantee Resources
   Top  TRIO Home            Last Modified: 05/03/2022
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Marvin F. Romanow, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Nexen Inc., a Canadian Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
     the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    July 15, 2005                               /s/ Marvin F. Romanow
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Marvin F. Romanow
                                                     Executive Vice President
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 )

United States of America ) Case No: 12 CR 514

)

v. )

) Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan

)

Otoniel Rodriguez )

)

ORDER

Defendant’s motion for reduction in sentence [62] is denied. 

STATEMENT

This matter is before the court on Defendant Otoniel Rodriguez’s (Rodriguez) motion for

reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 782. Sentencing

Guidelines Section 1B1.10 (Section 1B1.10), which governs a reduction in term of imprisonment

as a result of an amended guidelines range, provides in subsection (b)(2) the following:

(A) Except as provided in subdivision (B), the court shall not reduce the defendant’s term

of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and this policy statement to a term that is

less than the minimum of the amended guideline range determined under subdivision (1)

of this subsection. 

(B) Exception for Substantial Assistance.--If the term of imprisonment imposed was less

than the term of imprisonment provided by the guideline range applicable to the

defendant at the time of sentencing pursuant to a government motion to reflect the

defendant’s substantial assistance to authorities, a reduction comparably less than the

amended guideline range determined under subdivision (1) of this subsection may be

appropriate. 

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10. At sentencing, Rodriguez’s total offense level was 29 and his criminal

history category was II, resulting in an advisory guidelines range of 97 to 121 months. Based

upon a consideration of the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553, the court sentenced Rodriguez to 72

months of imprisonment. Under the current sentencing guidelines, Rodriguez’s total offense

level is 27 and his criminal history category is II, resulting in a new advisory guidelines range of

78 to 97 months. Since Rodriguez did not receive a sentence below the guidelines range based

on a motion by the Government relating to Rodriguez’s substantial assistance to the

Government, and his sentence of 72 months is already below his amended sentencing range

1
under the current guidelines, the court cannot reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 

Therefore, Rodriguez’s motion for reduction in sentence is denied.

Date: 5/3/17 ___________________________________

Samuel Der-Yeghiayan

United States District Court Judge

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NINDS Human Biospecimen and Data Repository U24 Review.                    

*Date:*                         February 11, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Li Jia, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3208D, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-451-2854,                         *li.jia@nih.gov.*
      ( print page 7300)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 21, 2021.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-01705 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:32
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:33
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:34
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:35
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:36
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:37
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:38
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:39
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:40
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:41
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:42
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:43
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:44
Case: 1:12-cv-00888 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:45
#### 216.403-2 Fixed-price incentive (successive targets) contracts.

See PGI 216.403-2 for guidance on the use of fixed-price incentive (successive targets) contracts.

[71 FR 39007, July 11, 2006]
# ...

SERVED: JULY 8, 2013**~~-** ---**-~-~------**

1 '

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON,DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### TRANS NORTHAVIATION, LTD.

FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046


### ORDERGRANTING COMPLAINANT'S MOTION /,.:·: (". ;) ;f;

··. l : ......: t
..**~**........

The Motion ofComplainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") to extend the time to answer the discovery requests ofRespondent Trans North Aviation, Ltd. ("Respondent") until July 9, 2013 is hereby GRANTED.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

### 2

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Charles R. 

### Barnett III, Respondent's Counsel 

### Barnett & 

### Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025 TEL: 847-809-9520 FAX: 815-356-7042 Jeanette B. 

### Daubaras, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Great Lakes Region Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, AL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7313 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.