alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 312 

Expressing support for the designation of September 2017 and 2018 each 

as ‘‘National Month for Renters’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2017 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 2017 

and 2018 each as ‘‘National Month for Renters’’. 

Whereas rental housing is a vital component of the housing 

market of the United States, providing a place to live for 

nearly 44,000,000 households and more than 

111,000,000 individuals in the United States; 

Whereas the number of households renting homes increased 

by 9,000,000 over the past decade, the largest 10-year 

gain on record; 

Whereas more than 11,000,000 households in communities 

across the United States spend more than 50 percent of 

their income on rent and utilities, making those households severely cost-burdened under Federal standards; 

and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 312 ATS 

Whereas those 11,000,000 severely cost-burdened households 

include 14,000,000 women, 8,000,000 children, 

9,000,000 members of the Millennial Generation, 

2,000,000 senior citizens, and nearly 800,000 veterans: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of September 2017 

3 and 2018 each as ‘‘National Month for Renters’’ to 

4 draw attention to the rental housing shortage in the 

5 United States; 

6 (2) urges a truly national effort involving all 

7 levels of government, the private sector, and the 

8 philanthropic community to expand the supply of 

9 rental homes affordable to low- and moderate-income 

10 households; 

11 (3) recognizes that subsidized rental housing 

12 programs implemented by the Federal Government 

only serve 1 13 ⁄4 of eligible renters and so are the equiv14 alent of a lottery; and 

15 (4) recognizes that expanding the supply of 

16 rental homes affordable to low- and moderate-income 

17 families, particularly when close to employment op18 portunities, will— 

19 (A) help reduce commuting costs; 

20 (B) restore the first rungs of the housing 

21 ladder; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 312 ATS 

1 (C) stabilize families and communities; 

2 (D) promote equality of opportunity; and 

3 (E) support greater economic growth and 

4 prosperity. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this 

Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by Local Rules 83.12 through 

83.14. 

In the Matter of Case Number: 1:12-cv-02391 

Randall Davis, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated v. 

The Coca-Cola Company 

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR: 

(In the space below, enter the name of the party or parties being represented) 

The Coca-Cola Company 

NAME (Type or print) 

Claudia M. Rustad 

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically) 

 s/ Claudia M. Rustad 

FIRM

Grippo & Elden LLC 

STREET ADDRESS

111 S. Wacker Drive

CITY/STATE/ZIP

Chicago, IL 60606

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS)

6270144

TELEPHONE NUMBER

312-704-7700

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? (Enter “Y” or “N”) No

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Yes

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Yes

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? (Enter “Y” or “N”) No

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, USE AN “X” TO DESCRIBE YOUR STATUS IN THIS CASE. 

 RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL

Case: 1:12-cv-02391 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:46
SERVED FEBRUARY 18, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BUD FISKE RAYMOND 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOWPOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0018 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009WP210026) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPlOWPOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Arthur Wasserman, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office of Arthur Wasserman 

16380 Roscoe Blvd., Suite 120 

VanNuys,CA 91406-1221 

TEL: 818-895-8234 

FAX: 818-895-0675 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7117 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999<F1>
<CASH>                                          39,629
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  783,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                    95,168
<INVENTORY>                                    526,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,308,784
<PP&E>                                       1,849,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                 738,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,080,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          855,163
<BONDS>                                      1,288,868
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       317,692
<OTHER-SE>                                     257,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,080,891
<SALES>                                      1,188,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,188,435
<CGS>                                        1,023,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,023,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65<F3>
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S FISCAL YEAR ENDS ON THE SATURDAY CLOSEST TO DECEMBER 31.  FISCAL
YEAR 1999 ENDS JANUARY 1, 2000 AND INCLUDES 52 WEEKS.  ALL QUARTERS INCLUDE 12
WEEKS, EXCEPT FOR THE THIRD QUARTER WHICH HAS 16 WEEKS.
<F2>IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE", THIS ITEM REFLECTS BASIC
EARNINGS PER SHARE.
<F3>IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE", THIS ITEM REFLECTS
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
19.502-6 Setting aside a class of acquisitions for small business. ( a ) A class of acquisitions of selected products or services, or a portion of the acquisitions, may be set aside for exclusive participation by small business concerns if individual acquisitions in the class will meet the criteria in 19.502-1, 19.502-2, or 19.502-3(a). The determination to make a class small business set-aside shall not depend on the existence of a current acquisition if future acquisitions can be clearly foreseen.
( b ) The determination to set aside a class of acquisitions for small business may be either unilateral or joint.
( c ) Each class small business set-aside determination shall be in writing and must— ( 1 ) Specifically identify the product(s) and service(s) it covers;
( 2 ) Provide that the set aside does not apply to any acquisition automatically under 19.502-2(a).
( 3 ) Provide that the set-aside applies only to the (named) contracting office(s) making the determination; and
( 4 ) Provide that the set-aside does not apply to any individual acquisition if the requirement is not severable into two or more economic production runs or reasonable lots, in the case of a partial class set-aside.
( d ) The contracting officer shall review each individual acquisition arising under a class small business set-aside to identify any changes in the magnitude of requirements, specifications, delivery requirements, or competitive market conditions that have occurred since the initial approval of the class small business set-aside. If there are any changes of such a material nature as to result in probable payment of more than a fair market price by the Government or in a change in the capability of small business concerns to satisfy the requirements, the contracting officer may withdraw or modify (see 19.502-9(a)) the unilateral or joint set-aside by giving written notice to the SBA PCR (or, if a PCR is not assigned, see 19.402(a)) stating the reasons.
[48 FR 42240, Sept. 19, 1989, as amended at 53 FR 43390, Oct. 26, 1988; 60 FR 34757, July 3, 1995; 63 FR 70270, Dec. 18, 1998; 71 FR 36926, June 28, 2006. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 11762, Feb. 27, 2020]
### 6309 Jellison Road Billings, MT 59101 406

- 252

- 6937 Website: billingsflyings ervice.com 

## To whom it may concern, Last year the FAA issued an exemption to train in our restricted category helicopters the CH
-47D. Once I got the exemption I noticed it restricted us to training only company pilots. I used the Sikorsky helicopters exemption as an approved precedence that was set. I submitte d a request that that limitation be removed from our exemption. I just received a letter stating the FAA denied my request, stating they only allowed Sikorsky to do that because there was no standard category availabl e to them. Here is my issue. Billin gs Flying Service do es not have access to a standard category CH
-47D (BV
- 234) . The only company that has those is Columbia and they are direct competitors to us. This puts us in the same position as Sikorsky. A standard category is NOT available to us. The other reason w e need to be able to train non
- company pilots is because we own the type certificate on the CH
-47D. This means we are the manufacturer of the aircraft. All manufacturers are aloud to train their customers. We need to be able to do the same in support of our customers. This situation allows for an unequal playing field for us and our competitor who has the ability to train non - company pilots. It puts our company and our customers in a undue hardship. I would like for you to help me resolve this issue. I have attached our exemption and the response from the FAA we just received. Please feel free to contact me if you need further information. Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Jeff Cook jeff@f lybfs.com 406
- 579
- 1195
#### In the Matter of Robert A. Iovino, Petitioner, v Raymond P. Martinez, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, et al., Respondents.

[835 NYS2d 36]

Determination after hearing by respondent Appeals Board, dated May 31, 2005, which revoked petitioner’s driver’s license, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Alice Schlesinger, J.], entered March 6, 2006) dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination that petitioner, a New York City police captain, refused to consent to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol level after being clearly warned of the consequences of such a refusal, is supported by substantial evidence (CPLR 7803 [4]; *see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176 [1978]). The Administrative Law Judge was free to accept the testimony of the arresting officer as to petitioner’s apparent intoxication and to reject the testimony of the other officers *(Matter of Soto v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.,*203 AD2d 370 [1994]). In the face of such conflicting evidence, we are not permitted to weigh the evidence or reject the administrative agency’s determination of credibility *(Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70*NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]), and in any event, we see no reason to do so here.

*312Petitioner’s remaining objection is without merit, as his refusal clearly took place within two hours of his arrest (Vehicle and. Traffic Law § 1194 [2] [a] [1]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2453

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2453 appear at 64 FR 46101, Aug. 23, 1999.

#### 2453.242 Contract administration.
# C_2016467EN.01001501.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 467/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 467/15

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 December 2016

(2016/C 467/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0644 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4359 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83963 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7553 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0747 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0223 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,89 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4402 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5153 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,7125 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4177 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3961 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2561 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4741 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5157 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 241,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5508 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3499 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5405 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 143,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7303 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,918 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 65,1386 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,882 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5242 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,5666 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,8245 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0644

JPY

Japanese yen

122,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4359

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83963

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7553

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0747

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0223

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,89

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4402

RON

Romanian leu

4,5153

TRY

Turkish lira

3,7125

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4177

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3961

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2561

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4741

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5157

KRW

South Korean won

1 241,10

ZAR

South African rand

14,5508

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3499

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5405

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 143,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7303

PHP

Philippine peso

52,918

RUB

Russian rouble

65,1386

THB

Thai baht

37,882

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5242

MXN

Mexican peso

21,5666

INR

Indian rupee

71,8245

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016413EN.01000301.xml

| 10.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 November 2016

(2016/C 413/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1022 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4417 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89030 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0025 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0793 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1193 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,027 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3388 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5050 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,5215 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4336 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4798 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5467 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5065 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5365 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 270,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8301 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4771 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5048 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 539,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6688 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,780 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,8562 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,516 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5565 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8522 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,3765 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1022

JPY

Japanese yen

114,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4417

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89030

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0025

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0793

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1193

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,027

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3388

RON

Romanian leu

4,5050

TRY

Turkish lira

3,5215

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4336

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4798

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5467

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5065

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5365

KRW

South Korean won

1 270,65

ZAR

South African rand

14,8301

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4771

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5048

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 539,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6688

PHP

Philippine peso

53,780

RUB

Russian rouble

69,8562

THB

Thai baht

38,516

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5565

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8522

INR

Indian rupee

73,3765

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2006
# C_2016459EN.01000202.xml

| 9.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8289 — Engie/Omnes Capital/Predica/MAIA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 459/04)

On 5 December 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8289. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8289. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0527 Standard Review Draft 1/5/2012 ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AH PV (kg/yr):file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM] SAT (concerns) (08/02/2011): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: PMN: Health 1-2, Eco 3. Deg Pdt: Health 2, Eco 3. Migration to groundwater: Moderate PBT rating: P3B3T2 PMN: P3B3T1; Deg Pdt: P3B3T2 Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0527file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0527file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110527.sr.txt[5/1/2013 1:50:52 PM]