alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016405EN.01000101.xml

| 4.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 405/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 405/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 November 2016

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 November 2016

(2016/C 405/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1025 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4389 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90173 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8800 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0823 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0213 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,024 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3085 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5055 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,4195 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4341 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4730 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5504 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5342 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5308 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 258,44 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8790 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4631 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5080 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 385,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6006 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,228 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,3698 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,610 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5239 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8180 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,5425 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1025

JPY

Japanese yen

115,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4389

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90173

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8800

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0823

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0213

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,024

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3085

RON

Romanian leu

4,5055

TRY

Turkish lira

3,4195

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4341

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4730

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5504

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5342

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5308

KRW

South Korean won

1 258,44

ZAR

South African rand

14,8790

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4631

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5080

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 385,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6006

PHP

Philippine peso

53,228

RUB

Russian rouble

69,3698

THB

Thai baht

38,610

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5239

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8180

INR

Indian rupee

73,5425

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 998 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 998

  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2017

Mr. Daines (for himself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Moving Americans Privacy Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION.

    Paragraph (2) of section 431(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1431(c)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall not be 
available for public disclosure if--
            ``(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an affirmative 
        finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis that disclosure is 
        likely to pose a threat of personal injury or property damage; 
        or
            ``(ii) the information is exempt under the provisions of 
        section 552(b)(1) of title 5 of the United States Code.
    ``(B) The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall 
ensure that any personally identifiable information, including social 
security numbers, passport numbers, and residential addresses, are 
removed from any manifest signed, produced, delivered, or transmitted 
under this section before the manifest is disclosed to the public.''.
                                 <all>
```
225.7019-3 Waiver. ( a ) *Request and approval of waiver.* The requiring activity may submit to the contracting activity a request for waiver of the prohibition in 225.7019-2 for a specific contract for the acquisition of furnished energy for a covered military installation. The head of the contracting activity, without power of redelegation, may approve the waiver, upon certification to the congressional defense committees that— ( 1 ) The waiver of section 2821 is necessary to ensure an adequate supply of furnished energy for the covered military installation; and
( 2 ) National security requirements have been balanced against the potential risk associated with reliance upon the Russian Federation for furnished energy.
( b ) *Submission of waiver notice.* ( 1 ) Not later than 14 days before the execution of any energy contract for which a waiver is granted under paragraph (a) of this section, the head of the contracting activity shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice of the waiver. See PGI 225.7019-3 for waiver procedures.
( 2 ) The waiver notice shall include the following: ( i ) The rationale for the waiver, including the basis for the certifications required by paragraph (a) of this section.
( ii ) An assessment of how the waiver may impact DoD's European energy resilience strategy.
( iii ) An explanation of the measures DoD is taking to mitigate the risk of using Russian Federation furnished energy.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

AF HOLDINGS LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

KENNETH PAYNE,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-04234

Judge: Hon. Gary Feinerman

Magistrate Judge: Hon. Jeffrey T. Gilbert

 

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff AF Holdings LLC (“Plaintiff”), through its undersigned counsel, hereby files 

this Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Action Without Prejudice, states as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed this action on May 31, 2012 (ECF No. 1), the Court granted it leave 

to subpoena the internet service provider referenced in the Complaint before the Rule 26(f) 

conference (ECF No. 8), and Plaintiff amended its complaint to name the Defendant in August 

2012 (ECF No. 12). 

2. The Defendant answered the Complaint on October 17, 2012 (EC F NO. 16) and 

the Court entered a scheduling order on November 8, 2012. (ECF No. 18.)

3. Plaintiff wishes to dismiss this case, without prejudice. Although Defendant has 

filed an answer, Plaintiff has not heard from Defendant in any fashion since October 2012.

Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court allow Plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss all claims in 

this action, without prejudice. Defendant has not filed a counterclaim, and granting this Motion 

will not cause any prejudice to Defendant.

Case: 1:12-cv-04234 Document #: 20 Filed: 03/19/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:112
2

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant this Motion, enter an 

order dismissing this case without prejudice, and granting any and all further relief that this 

Court deems to be reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted,

AF Holdings LLC,

DATED: March 19, 2013

By: /s/ Paul Duffy

Paul Duffy (Bar No. 6210496)

Prenda Law Inc.

161 N. Clark St., Suite 3200

Chicago, IL 60601

Phone: 312-880-9160

Fax: 312-893-5677

E-mail: paduffy@wefightpiracy.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case: 1:12-cv-04234 Document #: 20 Filed: 03/19/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:113
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 19, 2013, all individuals of record who 

are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served true and correct copy of the 

foregoing documents, and all attachments and related documents, using the Court’s ECF system. 

By: /s/ Paul Duffy

Case: 1:12-cv-04234 Document #: 20 Filed: 03/19/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:114
EXTENSION
                                       OF
                                FARMOUT AGREEMENT



This Extension of Farmout  Agreement  ("Extension") is entered into on this 13th
day of October,  2009, by and between Garner  Investments,  Inc.  ("Garner"),  a
Wyoming Corporation, and Sharon K. Fowler ("Farmor").

         WHEREAS,  on August 28, 2006,  Garner and Farmor entered into a Farmout
         Agreement ("the Farmout Agreement") whereby Garner agreed to commit and
         drill wells in certain areas detailed in the Farmout Agreement,  hereby
         attached as EXHIBIT A;

         WHEREAS,  the Farmout  Agreement  provides  for Garner to commence  the
         drilling of an initial well by December 10, 2007 or as soon thereafter;
         and

         WHEREAS,  both Garner and Farmer wish to extend the term of the Farmout
         Agreement.

NOWTHEREFORE BE IT:

(1)  The Farmout  Agreement  of August 28, 2006 is hereby  amended to extend the
     time  required to commence the drilling of the initial well to December 31,
     2010.

(2)  That all other  rights,  terms and  obligations  of the  Farmout  Agreement
     remain unchanged and in effect.


Accepted and hereby agreed to this 13th day of October, 2009.


GARNER INVESTMENTS, INC.                             SHARON K. FOWLER




/s/ Roy Smith                                     /s/ Sharon K Fowler
--------------------------------------------      -------------------
Roy Smith, President                                  Sharon K. Fowler,
                                                      Individually
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

** **

I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of The Cato Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

 

1.  theForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Dated:September 8, 2010

|   |                    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | /s/ John P. D. Cato     |
|   | John P. D. Cato         |
|   | Chairman, President and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

27

 

----
#### BRADY, Respondent, v. BRADY, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Deartment.

February 23, 1906.)

Action by Sad-3 V. Brady against Daniel M. Brady. J. J. Idams, for appellant. S. H. Ordway, for repondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with ;10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
M14004 

Part II, Section B – Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – 2 

1. Operation Description

2. Worker Exposure / Environmental Release Page 1 of 1 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 394A/27 Ν

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 394A |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 58ό έτος27 Νοεμβρίου 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 394A

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

58ό έτος27 Νοεμβρίου 2015

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Γνωστοποιήσεις |
| | ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ |
| | Eurojust |
| 2015/C 394A/01 | Προκήρυξη κενής θέσης για πρόσληψη διοικητικού διευθυντή (βαθμός AD 14) στην Eurojust — Χάγη (Κάτω Χώρες) — 15/EJ/04 | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

V   Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Eurojust

2015/C 394A/01

Προκήρυξη κενής θέσης για πρόσληψη διοικητικού διευθυντή (βαθμός AD 14) στην Eurojust — Χάγη (Κάτω Χώρες) — 15/EJ/04

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

V Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Eurojust

| 27.11.2015 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CA 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2015

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CA 394/1

---

ΠΡΟΚΉΡΥΞΗ ΚΕΝΉΣ ΘΈΣΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΠΡΌΣΛΗΨΗ ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΟΫ ΔΙΕΥΘΥΝΤΉ (ΒΑΘΜΌΣ AD 14) ΣΤΗΝ EUROJUST

Χάγη (Κάτω Χώρες) — 15/EJ/04

(2015/C 394 A/01)

Η Eurojust προσκαλεί για υποβολή αιτήσεων για τη θέση του διοικητικού διευθυντή της Eurojust. Η Eurojust ιδρύθηκε το 2002 με σκοπό να προωθεί και να βελτιώνει τον συντονισμό των ερευνών και των διώξεων των δικαστικών αρχών των κρατών μελών για την καταπολέμηση σοβαρών μορφών διασυνοριακού και οργανωμένου εγκλήματος. Το Κολέγιο της Eurojust αποτελείται από εισαγγελείς, δικαστές ή από αξιωματικούς Αστυνομίας με ανάλογες αρμοδιότητες, που είναι υπεύθυνοι για την οργάνωση και τη λειτουργία της. Το ανθρώπινο δυναμικό της Eurojust υπόκειται στον διοικητικό διευθυντή. Ο διοικητικός διευθυντής είναι αρμόδιος, υπό τη εποπτεία του προέδρου του Κολεγίου, για την καθημερινή διοίκηση της Eurojust και του προσωπικού της. Για περισσότερες λεπτομέρειες σχετικά με την προκήρυξη και τον τρόπο υποβολής της αίτησης, παρακαλούμε συμβουλευθείτε την ιστοσελίδα μας:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

Η προθεσμία για την υποβολή των αιτήσεων λήγει στις 31 Ιανουαρίου 2016 τα μεσάνυχτα.

---
#### The People of the State of New York v. Robert Kratchel.

Motion for allowance of bail denied on the ground that no certificate of reasonable doubt has been issued to defendant-appellant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### 225.7703 Enhanced authority to acquire products or services from Afghanistan.
#### Ysmael Quirico Hernandez VENEGAS; et al., Petitioners, v. Peter D. KEISLER,* Acting Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73933.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2007.**

Filed Nov. 7, 2007.

*709Samuel Ogbu, Esq., Emmanuel Enyinwa, Esq., Emeziem *&*Ogbu, LLP, Emery-ville, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Paul Fiorino, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: WALLACE, KLEINFELD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Peter D. Keisler is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzalez, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

The Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) determined that petitioners were not eligible for asylum or withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1231 and withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion. *See Wang v. Ashcroft,*341 F.3d 1015, 1019-1020 (9th Cir.2003).

To establish eligibility for asylum on the basis of past persecution, petitioners must show: “(1) an incident, or incidents, that rise to the level of persecution; (2) that is ‘on account of one of the statutorily-protected grounds; and (3) is committed by the government or forces the government is either ‘unable or unwilling’ to control.” *Navas v. INS,*217 F.3d 646, 655-56 (9th Cir.2000). Petitioners failed to show that any claimed past persecution was committed by the Mexican government or forces that the government was unable or unwilling to control. The woman who allegedly beat Arcinda HernandezVenegas was not affiliated with the government; furthermore, Arcinda Hernandez-Venegas testified that the woman was incarcerated for over a month and forced to pay part of Arcinda Hernandez-Venegas’ medical costs, evidencing the government’s willingness and ability to control her.

*710Petitioners are not eligible for relief under the CAT as there was no showing that the mistreatment was “by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.” 8 C.F.R. § 208.18(a)(1).

Petitioners did not challenge on appeal the Board’s determination that Reina Hernandez-Venegas was not born in the United States. The argument is therefore waived.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
24.102 General. ( a ) The Act requires that when an agency contracts for the design, development, or operation of a system of records on individuals on behalf of the agency to accomplish an agency function the agency must apply the requirements of the Act to the contractor and its employees working on the contract.
( b ) An agency officer or employee may be criminally liable for violations of the Act. When the contract provides for operation of a system of records on individuals, contractors and their employees are considered employees of the agency for purposes of the criminal penalties of the Act.
( c ) If a contract specifically provides for the design, development, or operation of a system of records on individuals on behalf of an agency to accomplish an agency function, the agency must apply the requirements of the Act to the contractor and its employees working on the contract. The system of records operated under the contract is deemed to be maintained by the agency and is subject to the Act.
( d ) Agencies, which within the limits of their authorities, fail to require that systems of records on individuals operated on their behalf under contracts be operated in conformance with the Act may be civilly liable to individuals injured as a consequence of any subsequent failure to maintain records in conformance with the Act.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-1218V 

Filed: December 14, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

LORI CLARK, 

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) 

Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to 

Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Robert Paul Coleman, III, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On September 28, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that suffered a left shoulder injury caused by her 

September 26, 2015 influenza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned 

to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 14, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “opines that petitioner’s alleged injury is 

consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”).” Id. at 3. 

Respondent further agrees that petitioner’s SIRVA was caused-in-fact by her 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
September 26, 2015 vaccination, that no other cause for petitioner’s injury was 

identified, that the statutory six month sequela requirement has been satisfied, and that 

all legal prerequisites to compensation under the Vaccine Act have been met. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

 Chief Special Master
25.301-4 Contract clause. Insert the clause at 52.225-19, Contractor Personnel in a Designated Operational Area or Supporting a Diplomatic or Consular Mission outside the United States, in solicitations and contracts, other than personal service contracts with individuals, that will require contractor personnel to perform outside the United States— ( a ) In a designated operational area during— ( 1 ) Contingency operations;
( 2 ) Humanitarian or peacekeeping operations; or
( 3 ) Other military operations or military exercises, when designated by the combatant commander; or
( b ) When supporting a diplomatic or consular mission— ( 1 ) That has been designated by the Department of State as a danger pay post (see *https://aoprals.state.gov/ ”*; or
( 2 ) That the contracting officer determines is a post at which application of the clause FAR 52.225-19, Contractor Personnel in a Designated Operational Area or Supporting a Diplomatic or Consular Mission outside the United States, is appropriate.
[73 FR 10957, Feb. 28, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 27101, May 6, 2020]
# C_2017174EN.01000101.xml

| 1.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8424 — SGAB/Acciona/SCCN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 174/01)

On 23 May 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the Spanish language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8424. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8424. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---