alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31



Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



I, Randy L. Denecky, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. (the registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

(intentionally omitted pursuant to the guidance contained in SEC Release No. 33  8238)



(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 17, 2003



/s/ Randy L. Denecky

Randy L. Denecky

President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
The Office of Communications and Outreach is responsible for overall leadership for the Department in its communications and outreach activities. These activities are designed to engage the general public, including a wide variety of education, community, business, parent, student, and other organizations, in the U.S. Department of Education's mission.

Communications include interaction and collaboration with the media, intergovernmental and interagency organizations. The Office directs, coordinates, and recommends policy for activities designed to:

- Make the Department's policies and the Secretary's goals widely understood by the public and the many groups interested and affected by education matters, with a particular emphasis on under-served groups;  
- Initiate and oversee the creation of specialized and proactive public outreach and information programs of high visibility and timeliness to generate interest in and focus on issues and activities relating to the mission of the Department;  
- Develop productive working relationships with the press, mass media outlets, and the many groups involved in education issues, as well as with other federal agencies, and state and local government and non- governmental organizations;  
- Develop communications strategies and work with all Principal Offices to oversee and coordinate communications efforts to ensure that a clear, coherent, and cohesive message is developed and communicated;  
- Develop Web-based content, digital media, video broadcasts, publications, written documents, and other communication products of high quality with useful content;  
- Lead, monitor, and include interagency cooperation involving the Department; and,  
- Direct and recommend policy for the Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs and recognition programs such as the Presidential Education Awards Program, the Presidential Scholars Program, Blue Ribbon Schools, and ED Green Ribbon School.
### Questions for Consideration **and Discussion**

**Exceptional Events Listening Session in Advance of Anticipated Rule Revisions**

1. Should we maintain the position presented in the interim guidance that the historical fluctuations criterion is not a “test” but a weight- of- evidence analysis that informs “clear causal” and “but for”? 2. Do the following High Wind elements provide streamlining and flexibility? a. Wind speed threshold b. Prospective controls analysis c. High Wind Action Plan 3. Would it be helpful to incorporate the following “not reasonably controllable or preventable” elements in rule language? a. Recently approved SIP measures meet “not reasonably controllable or preventable” requirements b. For natural sources and interstate/international transport no control = reasonable control 4. How should we address the “but for” criterion? Examples might include the following: a. Address adjustment of design values and daily values for events that are not “exceptional” by definition b. Revise definition away from “absolute” to more “weight of evidence” c. Other suggestions? 5. Do we need to provide definitions for the following terms? a. Event/natural event b. R ecurrence of natural events c. R easonable d. Other terms? 6. Should we address mitigation elements, including the relationship between Subpart H emergency episodes / contingency planning and exceptional events? 7. Would it be helpful to clarify those activities that constitute an EPA final agency action?Questions for Consideration and Discussion

Exceptional Events Listening Session in Advance of Anticipated Rule Revisions

Page 2 of 2 8. Do we need to clarify that concurrences are NAAQS- specific, not pollutant specific? 9. S hould we address whether EPA can consider a request for exclusion even if the air agency makes the request after the deadline? 10. Have air agencies experienced difficulty when flagging concurrences of PM 2.5 and PM 10 filter based (single 24- hour value) versus continuous (24 1 - hour values)? Has this created a difference in design values? 11. Would it be helpful to “clean - up” the EER to address the following? a. Scheduling provisions included in reg text that have been made irrelevant by the passage of time (e.g., 50.14(c)(2)(iv) For PM 2.5 data collected during calendar years 2004- 2006....) b. Scheduling deadlines following promulgation of new NAAQS to avoid case - by- case revisio ns 12. Do we need to address fire - related components? If so, how?
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ C.S. ParkDr. C.S. ParkChairman and Chief Executive
OfficerDate: February 21, 2006
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 127 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work 

Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2017 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

APRIL 27, 2017 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Take Our Daughters 

And Sons To Work Day. 

Whereas the Take Our Daughters To Work program was created in New York City as a response to research that 

showed that, by the 8th grade, many girls were dropping 

out of school, had low self-esteem, and lacked confidence; 

Whereas, in 2003, the name of the program was changed to 

‘‘Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work’’ so that boys 

who face many of the same challenges as girls could also 

be involved in the program; 

Whereas, in 2017, the mission of the program, to develop 

‘‘innovative strategies that empower girls and boys to 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 127 ATS 

overcome societal barriers to reach their full potential’’, 

fully reflects the addition of boys; 

Whereas the Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Foundation, a nonprofit organization, has grown to be one of 

the largest public awareness campaigns, with more than 

39,000,000 participants annually in more than 3,000,000 

organizations and workplaces representing each State; 

Whereas, in 2007, the Take Our Daughters To Work program transitioned to Elizabeth City, North Carolina, became known as the Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work Foundation, and received national recognition for 

its dedication to future generations; 

Whereas, every year, mayors, governors, and other private 

and public officials sign proclamations and lend support 

to Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Day; 

Whereas the fame of the Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work program has spread overseas, with requests and inquiries being made from around the world on how to operate the program; 

Whereas 2017 marks the 24th anniversary of the Take Our 

Daughters And Sons To Work program; 

Whereas Take Our Daughters And Sons To Work Day will 

be observed on Thursday, April 27, 2017; and 

Whereas, by offering opportunities for children to experience 

activities and events, Take Our Daughters And Sons To 

Work Day is intended to continue helping millions of 

girls and boys on an annual basis to examine their opportunities and strive to reach their fullest potential: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 127 ATS 

1 (1) recognizes the goals of introducing our 

2 daughters and sons to the workplace; and 

3 (2) commends all participants of Take Our 

4 Daughters And Sons To Work Day for the— 

5 (A) ongoing contributions that the partici6 pants make to education; and 

7 (B) vital role that the participants play in 

8 promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger fu9 ture for the United States. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00341-CR

Lance Edward Goodwin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RUNNELS COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 5208, HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Lance Edward Goodwin filed a “petition for writ of error coram nobis” in the

district court, challenging the validity of the court’s 2003 judgment finding Goodwin guilty of

the offense of impersonating a public servant and placing Goodwin on community supervision.

1

The district court dismissed Goodwin’s petition, and Goodwin has filed a pro se notice of appeal

from that order.

The purpose of the writ of error coram nobis is to bring before the court rendering

the judgment matters of fact which, if known at the time the judgment was rendered, would have

prevented its rendition. Ex parte McKenzie, 115 Tex. Crim. 315, 29 S.W.2d 771, 772 (Tex. Crim.

In 2006, the district court signed an order discharging Goodwin from the terms and 1

conditions of his community supervision.
App. 1930). The court of criminal appeals has long held that the writ has no application in this State.

See Ex parte Massey, 157 Tex. Crim. 491, 249 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See McKenzie,

29 S.W.2d at 772.

___________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 21, 2010

Do Not Publish

2
#### 22.2107 Waiver of rights.

Employees cannot waive, nor may contractors induce employees to waive, their rights under E.O. 13706 or 29 CFR part 13 (see 29 CFR 13.7).
1 

### RECORD OF CONVERSATION

Date of Conversation: January 9, 2015

Company: Liberty Foundation

Contact Name: Mr. Ray Fo wler

Docket Number: FAA

- 2004

- 17662

Phone: Phone Number:

Email: Email Address:

Visit: Location:

Subject: Need for more ELOS information on the topics below

Details: Conversation with Mr Ray Fowler on March 9, 2015

Conclusion or Action Taken : Liberty Foundation will provide needed information in 30 days,

of March 9, 2015

NAME OFFICE DATE SIGNATURE
Thomas J. Leahy AFS

- 830

Liberty Foundation Did not include a risk management o r SMS document in support of its

commitment to Equal Level of Safety ( ELOS ) , which it will need to implement if this Exemption

is granted.

Liberty Foundation has not submitted an Operations Manual or training documents in support of ELOS, which it will need to implement if granted. **CONTACT INFORMATION**

**CONVERSATION INFORMATION** 

**FAA EMPLOYEE INFORMATION** 2 This office proposes a teleconference or meeting to clarify the FAA position and discuss the following topics:

 Liberty Foundation ’s need to include Risk Management or SMS and Operations

Document or Manual

.

 Liberty Foundation ’s O perations M anual must in terface with the SMS Manual, Neither

d ocument is sufficient as a stand

- alone document.

 Liberty Foundation ’s operations manual must include an operational control structure and the elements required to support an SMS program, pilot aircraft training

, qua lification

, general subjects training

, maintenance provider training

, .

 Must p rovide an operational control structure or chain of command within your operations manual for pilot’s maintenance, and support personnel or supporting

documents that these safeguards are in place.

 Please list the qualifications required to hold an operational control position.

 Please provide an outline or explanation of your proposed general subjects and maintenance training.

Comments or submission of additional docu ments or clarifications addressing these concerns would be helpful in evaluating Liberty Foundation ’s ELOS position.

Absent requested information Liberty Foundation will not meet an ELOS IAW CFR 14 Part 11.

Please provide the requested information with in 30 days.

Conversation completed March 9, 2015
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11




              CAPITAL INVESTMENT OF HAWAII, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share

                  Three months ended January 31, 1996 and 1995

                                      and

                   Six months ended January 31, 1996 and 1995

                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months                           Six Months
                                                       January 31,                            January 31,
                                                    1996           1995                1996                1995
                                                    ----           ----                ----                ----
<S>                                          <C>                    <C>           <C>                     <C>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
    OF COMMON SHARES
    OUTSTANDING:

         Common shares issued                     1,723,765         1,723,765          1,723,765          1,723,765
             Less common shares in
                 treasury                           691,082           691,082            691,082            691,082
                                             --------------     -------------     --------------    ---------------

Weighted average shares outstanding
    during the period                             1,032,683         1,032,683          1,032,683          1,032,683
                                             ==============     =============     ==============    ===============

         Net loss                            $      (58,150)         (208,942)    $     (378,992)          (684,747)
                                             ==============     =============     ==============    ===============

         Net loss per common share           $         (.06)             (.20)    $         (.37)              (.66)
                                             ==============     =============     ==============    ===============
</TABLE>
#### BURLINGAME, Respondent, v.DYKEMAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 10, 1906.)

Action by Earl Burlingame against James H Dykeman.

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, withou costs, and motion granted, changing the plan of trial from Wyoming to Orange county.

MCLENNAN, P. j.,

dissents.

HISCOOK,

J. not sitting.
(32) For each educational program that is designed to meet educational requirements for a specific 

professional license or certification that is required for employment in an occupation, or is advertised as 

meeting such requirements; and for each state location in which a student begins their participation in 

that program; and that the student remains enrolled, each program must - 

(i) Be programmatically accredited, if such accreditation is required by the State or a Federal 

agency; and

(ii) Assess and satisfy the applicable educational prerequisites for professional licensure or 

certification requirements in the State, if such prerequisites are available or can be obtained 

from the State, 

(iii) Institutions may make case-by-case exceptions to enroll students in a program that fails to 

meet the requirements of (i) and/or (ii) by obtaining the prior signed written consent of each 

student who opts to knowingly enroll in such programs and states their reason for their 

decision.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Rene Medori, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of The BOC Group plc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: December 6, 2004

                                                       /s/ Rene Medori
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                         Rene Medori
                                                   Group Finance Director
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Earl Richard Gleason, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Appellant, specifically waived assignment of counsel upon this appeal. (Appeal from order of Cattaraugus County Court denying following a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for burglary, third degree, rendered October 30, 1959.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecehio, JJ.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-40397 and No. 33-44776) of Flow International Corporation of our report dated July 29, 2005, except for the restatement discussed under Amendment No. 1 in Note 2
(not presented herein) to the consolidated financial statements as to which the date is November 21, 2005 and except for the restatement discussed under Amendment No. 2 in Note 2 (not presented herein) and the effects of the
discontinued operations related to the disposal of the Avure Business discussed in Note 3, as to which the date is January 31, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                                 
|Seattle, Washington              
|July 13, 2007