alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(a)  PHARMOS CORPORATION SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS  In connection with the annual report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, ROBERT F. JOHNSTON, Executive Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Date: February 29, 2008  By:/s/ Robert F. Johnston
    In connection with the annual report of PHARMOS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, S. COLIN NEILL, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.    This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: February 29, 2008




By:/s/ S. Colin Neill





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pharmos Corporation and will be retained by Pharmos Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Legislation**: *Higher Education Act of 1965*, as amended, Title IV, Part    A, Subpart 1;  20 U.S.C. 1070a.

**Regulations**: 34 CFR 690
### FI LED U . S . COURT OF APP EALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT J uly 20, 20 05 THO MAS K. KAH N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 05- 1006 5 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ A ge nc y D oc ke t N o. 12- CV -2 3440 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Pe tit ion er -C ro ss R es pond en t,
ve rs us FIS HE R IS LA

ND HO LD IN GS , L CC, FISHER IS LAND CLUB, INC., et al ., Re spon de nts -C ro ss P et iti one rs .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Application for E nforcem ent of an O rder of the Na tional Labor Rela tions Board

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (J ul y 20 , 200 5) Be fo re T JO FL A T , D U BI N A a nd C O X , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: T he N at ion al L ab or

Re la tio ns B oa rd (“N L RB ”) appl ie s to thi s c ourt f or
en fo rc em en t of

it s or de r iss ue d a ga ins t F ish er I sland H old ing s, L L C ( “ Fi she r” ). F or2

the reasons stated i n M emb er Me isburg’s dissenting opini on, w e conclude that N L RB ’ s f

ind ing tha t F ish er

vio la te d 29 U
. S. C. § 15 8( a) (1 ) is n ot s uppo rt ed by
su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce. Se e In t’l Bhd

. of Boi le rma ker s v. NLRB , 127 F. 3d 1 300, 130 6 (11th Cir. 1997). NL RB’ s application for enforcem ent of its cease and desis t order is the re fo re de nie d. N L RB ’ s or de r req ui ring tha t a ne w e m plo y ee r ep re se nta tio n election be held is no t a final order within t h e m ea n i n g o f § 1 60(f) and is theref ore
u n rev ie wab le at t hi s t im e. Se e Flo ri da Bd. Of Bu s. Reg ul at io n v . NLRB , 6 86 F
. 2d 1362 , 1366 n.8 (11th Cir. 1982); se e als o C oope r/T

. Sm ith , I nc . v . NLRB , 17 7 F. 3d 1259 , 1261 n.1 (11th. Cir 1999) (stating that an em ploy er c an o b t ai n reviewof a Board re presentation decisio n onlyby ref using to bargain after

a union is certified). Fo r th atreas on , NLRB’s app li cat io n fo r en fo rcem en t m us t b e d en ie d i n fu ll
. DENIED.
#### 245.602-70 Plant clearance procedures.

Follow the procedures at PGI 245.602-70 for establishing and processing a plant clearance case.
#### 252.227-7024 Notice and approval of restricted designs.

As prescribed at 227.7107-3, use the following clause:

# Notice and Approval of Restricted Designs (APR 1984)

In the performance of this contract, the Contractor shall, to the extent practicable, make maximum use of structures, machines, products, materials, construction methods, and equipment that are readily available through Government or competitive commercial channels, or through standard or proven production techniques, methods, and processes. Unless approved by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall not produce a design or specification that requires in this construction work the use of structures, products, materials, construction equipment, or processes that are known by the Contractor to be available only from a sole source. The Contractor shall promptly report any such design or specification to the Contracting Officer and give the reason why it is considered necessary to so restrict the design or specification.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 33505, June 28, 1995]
Case: 1:12-cv-04164 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-04164 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-04164 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-04164 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-04164 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5
U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Environmental Management

Washington, DC

DOE/EIS-0423D

January 2010

Long-Term Management and

Storage of Elemental Mercury

Long-Term Management and

Storage of Elemental Mercury

Environmental Impact Statement

Draft Draft

Environmental Impact Statement
For information or to submit comments on this 

Draft Mercury Storage EIS, contact:

AVAILABILITY OF THE

DRAFT LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AND

STORAGE OF ELEMENTAL MERCURY

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Printed with soy ink on recycled paper

David Levenstein, Document Manager

Office of Environmental Compliance (EM–41)

U.S. Department of Energy

Post Office Box 2612

Germantown, MD 20874

Website: http://www.mercurystorageeis.com

Fax: 877-274-5462
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47 .5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________
No. 95-40737 Summary Calendar

__________________

Imad Farah Bechara,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus
Immigration and Naturalization Service,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(L-95-CV-79)

______________________________________________

February 1, 1996

Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Imad Farah Bechara appeals from the d istrict court's

dismissal, as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of his petition

for writ of habeas corpus. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find, for the reasons set forth in its

Memorandum and Order dated August 24, 1995, that the district court

correctly dismissed Bechara's petition. Additionally, those issues2

rai sed by Bechara for the first time on appeal are not properly

before this Court and will not be considered.

Bechara's request for a discretiona ry stay of deportation

under the All Writs Act is DENIED. Bechara's requests to

supplement the record on appeal are DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-2000        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                 1,626,000             23,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            371,000             23,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                  0
<INVENTORY>                                    0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,144,000            735,000
<PP&E>                                59,371,000         38,251,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            40,000             39,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        66,101,000         41,303,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    918,000          3,676,000
<BONDS>                                        0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  5,463,000          5,200,000
<PREFERRED>                                    0                  0
<COMMON>                                   1,000                  0
<OTHER-SE>                            39,272,000         22,851,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          66,101,000         41,303,000
<SALES>                                        0                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,177,000            685,000
<CGS>                                          0                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          2,601,000          1,652,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        (127,000)           913,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    25,293,000            309,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (26,590,000)        (2,189,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (26,590,000)        (2,189,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                  0
<CHANGES>                                      0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         (26,590,000)        (2,189,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (19.66)             (2.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (19.66)             (2.51)



</TABLE>
#### 25.406 Israeli Trade Act.

Acquisitions of supplies by most agencies are covered by the Israeli Trade Act, if the estimated value of the acquisition is $50,000 or more but does not exceed the WTO GPA threshold for supplies (see 25.402(b)). Agencies other than the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, the Department of Transportation, the Bureau of Reclamation of the Department of the Interior, the Federal Housing Finance Board, and the Office of Thrift Supervision must evaluate offers of Israeli end products without regard to the restrictions of the Buy American statute. The Israeli Trade Act does not prohibit the purchase of other foreign end products. In accordance with Section 201 (a)(3) of the Dominican Republic—Central America—United States Free Trade Implementation Act (Pub. L. 109-53), when the CAFTA-DR agreement enters into force with respect to a country, that country is no longer designated as a beneficiary country for purposes of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, and is therefore no longer included in the definition of “Caribbean Basin country” for purposes of the Caribbean Basin Trade Initiative.

[64 FR 72419, Dec. 27, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 21535, Apr. 30, 2002; 69 FR 1055, Jan. 7, 2004; 69 FR 77875, Dec. 28, 2004; 71 FR 36937, June 28, 2006; 79 FR 24209, Apr. 29, 2014]]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7145

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES DEVON POWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-01-295; CA-03-862-H-5) Submitted: December 10, 2004 Decided: December 29, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Andrew McBride, Beverly Hills, California, for Appellant. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James Devon Powell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Powell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ira Phillips, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 802]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), rendered February 18, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There *400is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility, including its resolution of alleged inconsistencies in police testimony *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
');
	document.write('

**Who May Apply:** Institutions of Higher Education.

An eligible applicant is an institution of higher education, which offers a court reporting program that:  (1) has a curriculum capable of training realtime writers qualified to provide captioning services; (2) is accredited by an accrediting agency or association recognized by the Secretary; and (3) is participating in student aid programs under Title IV.

The applicant is required to provide its OPE ID number which it uses for Title IV purposes.

FIPSE Home
National Archives anti, Records Administration

I

Office of the Federal Register

July 16, 2010

FAA

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Room 915 J, Regulations Division

Washington, DC 20591

ATTN' Nancy Molitor, F.AA Liaison Officer for the Federal Register

Dear Ms. Molilor:

The materiallisied in the attachment is approved for in'':;-;JrpoT3ticn by reference in 14CFR Pan 39.

11m appro;:al is contingent. upon the final rule cOlltain~gaqx la~guag~ change~, which we:~ a~eed upon by

our staffs. 1he approval to mcorporate by reference this pu~hcatlOn{s) IS effective on the effective date ofyanr

finalmle. If you wish to enforce some other edition oftbe p'ublication(s) approved, you must:

1. Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register, aL amend the Code of Federal Regulations; and

I

2. Ensure that a copy of thaI edition is on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and

3. Notify me in writing of the change.

Sincerely,

~EY

Director of the Federal Register

Federal Register Attorney: -4{.l:5

Attachment

, '"

us. mail address: 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740:6001

Office location: 800 North Capitol So-eC't, NW, SuHe 700, Wash.ington, IX 20002-4244

!"'ederai R<'gister web sites: bttp:! jwww.archives.gov/federal-rebster I/Ild I1ttp://WWW,gpoilccess.gov / nara

, '.'. ,,'.
!ncOlporafion by Reference

Docker No. FAA-2009-0003; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-251-AD; Amendment 39-16368,- AD 2010-15-02

Airbus A330 and 340

Airbus A330 and 340

Airbus A330 and 340

Airbus A330 and 340

Mandatory Service Revision 1 0311912008

Bulletin A33D-27-3151,

including Appendix 1

Mandatory Service Revision 3 0212212010

Bulletin A330-27-3152,

including Appendices 1

and 2

Mandatory Service Revision 1 0311912008

Bulletin A340-27-4151,

including Appendix 1

Mandatory Service Revision 2 09/2312008

Bulletin A340-27-4152,

including Appendices 1

and 2

Airbus A330 and 340 Mandatory Service Revision 2

Bulletin A340-27-5040.

including Appendix 1

0912312010

Docket No. FAA-2010-0174: Director(l{e Identifier 2009-NM-186-AD; Amendmenl39-16359; AD 2010-14-14

EMBRAER

EMBRAER

Section 1, EMBRAER Revision 6

170 Maintenance

Review Board Report

(MRBR) MRB-1621

Service Bulletin 170-36- Revision 1

0004

01/1412010

0311012008

EMBRAER

EMBAAER

Service Bulletin 170-36·

0011

Service Bulletin 190-36-

0006

Revision 2

I

Revision 1

07/19/2007

07/19/2007

EMBRAER Service Bulletin 190-36· Revision 1 01/1412009

0014 I

Docket No. FAA-20J 0-067 J..Directorate identifier 201 O-NM-142-AD: Amendment 39-16363: AD 2010-14-18

Boeing Commercia! Airplanes

Primed 7/1612010

Alert Service Bulletin

767·54A0101

Revision 5 06/29/2010

Page I ofl
3.909-1 Prohibition. ( a ) The Government is prohibited from using fiscal year 2015 and subsequent fiscal year funds for a contract with an entity that requires employees or subcontractors of such entity seeking to report waste, fraud, or abuse to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements prohibiting or otherwise restricting such employees or subcontractors from lawfully reporting such waste, fraud, or abuse to a designated investigative or law enforcement representative of a Federal department or agency authorized to receive such information. See section 743 of Division E, Title VII, of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions.)
( b ) The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section does not contravene requirements applicable to Standard Form 312 (Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement), Form 4414 (Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement), or any other form issued by a Federal department or agency governing the nondisclosure of classified information.
[82 FR 4721, Jan. 13, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel, February 19, 
2021, 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., 6701 Democracy Blvd., Democracy One, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, which was published in the Federal Register on 
January 14, 2021, 86 FR 3163.
    The NINR Special Emphasis Panel meeting is being amended due to a 
change in the meeting time. This meeting held on February 19, 2021 will 
now start at 2:00 p.m. and will adjourn at 4:00 p.m. The meeting is 
closed to the public.

    Dated: January 21, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01704 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EPA carbon hearing testimony, May 24th 2012 

Carol Oldham, National Wildlife Federation 

Good afternoon, my name is Carol Oldham, and I live in Brookline Massachusetts. I am the 

National Wildlife Federation's Northeast Regional Outreach Coordinator. I am here on behalf 

of the more than 500,000 members and supporters of the National Wildlife Federation in the 

Northeast. I am also an elected representaitver in Brookline. The town of Brookline and the 

state of Massachusetts have made strong commitments to decrease their carbon emissions 

because they represent a clear danger to human health and the natural world. I personally 

have made every effort in my individual life to decrease my impacts and dedicated my career to 

helping others do so as well. 

I love to get outdoors doing almost anything, but this last winter I had no chance to go skiing 

or snowshoeing. The northeast had practically no winter at all. This year was the earliest 

recorded ice out on the lake in New Hampshire where my grandmother's cabin is, almost a 

month earlier than last year. I found a tick on me when I went hiking in March, and who knows 

what the heat will be like this summer. I love wildlife and worry about our moose- as Eric Orff 

of New Hampshire mentioned earlier in his testimony, they are suffering from increased tick 

populations. Some of my favorite animals, like lynx, thrive in areas with cold winters, and are 

having a hard time as our weather is already warming. 

This is why carbon pollution should be controlled -..it,)s bad for our health, and bad for wildlife. 

I applaud the Environmental Protection Agency's1o'tontrol carbon pollution and I strongly 

encourage you to move forward with this important rule. I would also encourage you to look at 

controlling carbon pollution from existing power plants. 

thank you for your time and the opportunity to speak to you today.
Chart 25665HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       25665          Edition:       11          Edition       Date: May       2006          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/10/2010     LNM -       6/29/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce