57–470 PDF 

Calendar No. 469 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 2d Session 111–226 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND 

RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATION BILL, 2011 

JULY 19, 2010.—Ordered to be printed 

Mr. JOHNSON, from the Committee on Appropriations, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany S. 3615] 

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 3615) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of 

Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2011, and for other purposes, reports favorably 

thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. 

Amounts in new budget authority 

Total of fiscal year 2011 bill as reported to the 

Senate ....................................................................$143,530,131,000 

Total of fiscal year 2012 advance appropriations 

included in this bill ............................................... 50,610,985,000 

Amount of 2010 appropriations ............................... 182,750,300,000 

Amount of 2011 budget estimate ............................ 143,531,666,000 

Bill as recommended to Senate compared to— 

Amount of 2010 appropriations ........................ ¥39,220,169,000 

Amount of 2011 budget estimate ..................... ¥1,535,000 
(2) 

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

Background: 

Purpose of the Bill ............................................................................................ 4 

Committee Recommendation ........................................................................... 4 

Overview and Summary of the Bill ................................................................. 4 

Military Construction: Investing in Infrastructure for Our Troops and 

Their Families ............................................................................................... 5 

Department of Veterans Affairs: Transfomation to a 21st Century Department ............................................................................................................... 6 

Title I: 

Military Construction: 

Items of Special Interest: 

Hearings .............................................................................................. 7 

Summary of Committee Recommendations ..................................... 7 

Reprogramming Guidelines ............................................................... 7 

Real Property Maintenance ............................................................... 7 

Incremental Funding ......................................................................... 7 

Global Challenges .............................................................................. 7 

Military Construction, Army .................................................................... 16 

Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ..................................... 17 

Military Construction, Air Force .............................................................. 18 

Military Construction, Defense-Wide ...................................................... 19 

Military Construction, Reserve Components .......................................... 22 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization ........................................................ 25 

Family Housing Overview ........................................................................ 26 

Family Housing Construction, Army ....................................................... 26 

Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Army ............................. 27 

Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ........................ 27 

Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Navy and Marine 

Corps ....................................................................................................... 29 

Family Housing Construction, Air Force ................................................. 29 

Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ....................... 30 

Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide ................ 30 

Family Housing Improvement Fund ........................................................ 31 

Homeowners Assistance Fund .................................................................. 31 

Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense-Wide ........................ 32 

Base Closure Account 1990 ...................................................................... 33 

Base Closure Account 2005 ...................................................................... 33 

Administrative Provisions ........................................................................ 37 

Title II: 

Department of Veterans Affairs: 

Items of Special Interest: 

Hearings .............................................................................................. 39 

Summary of Committee Recommendation ....................................... 39 

Department Overview ........................................................................ 39 

Veterans Benefits Administration ........................................................... 40 

Compensation and Pensions .............................................................. 41 

Readjustment Benefits ....................................................................... 42 

Veterans Insurance and Indemnities ............................................... 42 

Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund ........................................ 43 

Vocational Rehabilitation Loans Program Account ......................... 44 

Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program Account ........... 44 

Veterans Health Administration .............................................................. 44 

Medical Services ................................................................................. 47 

Medical Support and Compliance ..................................................... 51 
Page

3 

Title II—Continued 

Department of Veterans Affairs—Continued 

Veterans Health Administration—Continued 

Medical Facilities ............................................................................... 52 

Medical and Prosthetic Research ...................................................... 53 

Medical Care Cost Recovery Collections .......................................... 54 

Medical Care Collection Fund—Revenues Applied ......................... 54 

National Cemetery Administration .......................................................... 55 

Departmental Administration .................................................................. 55 

General Operating Expenses, Veterans Benefits Administration .. 56 

General Administration ..................................................................... 58 

Information Technology Systems ...................................................... 61 

Office of Inspector General ................................................................ 61 

Construction, Major Projects ............................................................. 63 

Construction, Minor Projects ............................................................. 65 

Grants for Construction of State Extended Care Facilities ............ 66 

Grants for Construction of State Veterans Cemeteries .................. 67 

Administrative Provisions ................................................................. 68 

Title III: 

Related Agencies: 

American Battle Monuments Commission: 

Salaries and Expenses ....................................................................... 70 

Foreign Currency Fluctuations ......................................................... 70 

U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims: Salaries and Expenses .... 71 

Department of Defense—Civil: Cemeterial Expenses, Army: Salaries 

and Expenses ......................................................................................... 71 

Armed Forces Retirement Home .............................................................. 73 

Title IV: 

Overseas Contingency Operations: 

Military Construction, Army .................................................................... 74 

Military Construction, Air Force .............................................................. 75 

Military Construction, Defense-Wide ...................................................... 75 

Title V: General Provisions ..................................................................................... 76 

Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of the Senate .......................................................................................................................... 77 

Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate ................................................................................................................... 78 

Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate ................................................................................................................... 78 

Budgetary Impact of Bill ......................................................................................... 79 

Military Construction Project Listing by Location ................................................ 80 

Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items ...................................... 107 
(4) 

BACKGROUND 

PURPOSE OF THE BILL

The Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies appropriations bill provides necessary funding for the planning, design, construction, alteration, and improvement of military 

facilities worldwide, for both active and reserve forces. It also finances the cost of military family housing and the U.S. share of the 

NATO Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill provides 

funding to implement base closures and realignments authorized 

by law. The bill provides resources to the Department of Veterans 

Affairs for veterans benefits and healthcare and funding for U.S. 

cemeteries and battlefield monuments both in the United States 

and abroad, including Arlington National Cemetery; the U.S. Court 

of Appeals for Veterans Claims; and Armed Forces Retirement 

Homes. The bill also provides funding for Overseas Contingency 

Operations military construction and advance appropriations for 

veterans medical services. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends appropriations totaling 

$143,530,131,000 for fiscal year 2011 military construction, family 

housing, base closure, veterans healthcare and benefits, fiscal year 

2012 advance appropriations for veterans medical care, related 

agencies, and overseas contingency operations. This includes 

$63,849,146,000 in mandatory funding and $79,680,985,000 in discretionary funding. The table at the end of the report displays the 

Committee recommendation in comparison with the current fiscal 

year, and the President’s fiscal year 2011 request. 

OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF BILL

The Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs and Related 

Agencies appropriations bill funds an array of programs that are 

vital to America’s military personnel and their families, and to the 

Nations’ veterans. For U.S. military forces and their families worldwide, the bill funds critical infrastructure, ranging from mission essential operational and training facilities to key quality of life facilities, including barracks, family housing, child care centers, 

schools and hospitals. For America’s 23,100,000 veterans, the bill 

provides the necessary funding for veterans benefits and 

healthcare, from prescription drugs and clinical services to the construction of hospitals and other medical facilities throughout the 

Nation. The bill also provides funds for U.S. cemeteries and monuments both in the United States and overseas, the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for Veterans Claims, the Armed Forces Retirement Homes, 

and military construction for Overseas Contingency Operations. 
5 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION: INVESTING IN INFRASTRUCTURE FOR OUR

TROOPS AND THEIR FAMILIES

Infrastructure provides the framework to support America’s military forces and military families at home and overseas. New missions to meet 21st century threats, major base realignments and 

stationing shifts worldwide, significant increases in Army and Marine Corps troop strength, and the spike in expeditionary facilities 

needed to support combat forces in Afghanistan have brought a 

surge of military construction demands in recent years. At the 

same time, the military continues to be confronted with the need 

to replace aging infrastructure and provide quality housing and 

community support facilities for military troops and their families. 

It is imperative that the infrastructure needs of our troops and 

their families continue to keep pace with the persistent demand for 

new facilities—whether it is a need for an elementary school in 

North Carolina or a barracks requirement in Afghanistan. 

Over the past several years, the annual budget requests for military construction have rocketed due to the demand for additional 

facilities needed to support the BRAC 2005 program and the increase in end strength of the Army and Marine Corps. Due largely 

to the conclusion of BRAC 2005 construction funding in fiscal year 

2011, the military construction budget request has dropped 

$4,532,582,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level. With the 

spotlight again on the regular military construction program, the 

Committee is concerned that current mission requirements will 

continue to compete with emerging mission requirements for a 

smaller pool of available funding, and that efforts to replace aging 

infrastructure may lose out in the competition for funds. This scenario is particularly relevant in the case of the Air Force Reserve, 

whose budget request included only one military construction 

project. During the budget roll-out, it was acknowledged that the 

Air Force Reserve had fewer ‘‘new mission’’ requirements, leaving 

the Reserve component on the losing end of the resource allocation. 

These actions will continue if hard decisions are not made to identify and fund the critical infrastructure needs to support operational activities—whether those activities are new or old. Also 

stressing the regular military construction budget is the growing 

demand for infrastructure investment to support major installation 

realignments overseas in the European and Pacific theaters. Adequate planning and oversight from the Department is essential to 

manage these competing priorities in a time of budgetary restraint. 

Because of the ongoing constraints on the regular military construction budget, the Committee has continued its practice of providing additional funding, where indicated, to supplement the 

President’s budget request, with particular emphasis on mission 

critical and quality of life facilities. The Committee has vetted each 

of the military construction projects included in the Committee recommendation with the services and defense agencies to ensure that 

every project is a priority of the base commander, meets a military 

requirement, and is executable. Because the military construction 

accounts are project based, with funding earmarked by the President for specific projects, the additional funding provided by the 

Committee is also project specific. All major construction projects 
6 

funded through the military construction appropriations accounts 

are included in the President’s budget request or the services’ Future Years Defense Programs [FYDPs] and are consistent with the 

criteria for additional funding for military construction projects in 

section 2856 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337). Each of the major construction 

projects added to this bill is authorized in the Committee reported 

version of the Senate National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011. 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: TRANSFORMATION TO A 21ST

CENTURY DEPARTMENT

Today’s VA is at a crossroads. With aging infrastructure and 

technology, pressing needs of an aging veteran population, and new 

combat veterans entering the system, the Department cannot afford to continue to do business in the same manner it has. The Secretary has made transforming the VA into a 21st century organization dedicated to veteran-centric processes his top priority. This includes harnessing technology to move the Veterans Benefits Administration from a paper driven, highly manual process to one 

that empowers veterans by utilizing computer-based technology. 

Similarly, the Veterans Health Administration must continue to recapitalize aging infrastructure and pave the way in its use of technology to deliver high-quality medical care. Today’s medical treatment requires state-of-the-art hospitals and modern, efficient, and 

reliable technology. The VA is facing numerous challenges over the 

next decade, but the Committee is dedicated to providing the VA 

with the resources it needs to meet these challenges and transform 

into a 21st century organization. 
(7) 

TITLE I 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

HEARINGS

The Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs 

and Related Agencies held two hearings related to the fiscal year 

2011 military construction budget request. Witnesses included representatives of the Office of Secretary of Defense and of the active 

and reserve components of the Army, Navy and Air Force. 

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

The fiscal year 2011 budget request for military construction and 

family housing totals $18,747,368,000. The request reflects a decrease of $4,532,582,000 from the fiscal year 2010 enacted level. In 

addition to the military construction and family housing request, 

the President’s budget request for fiscal year 2011 includes 

$1,257,002,000 for overseas contingency operations. This request is 

reflected in title IV of the bill and report. 

For title I, the Committee recommends $18,747,368,000, equal to 

the budget request for military construction and family housing. 

REPROGRAMMING GUIDELINES

The following reprogramming guidelines apply for all military 

construction and family housing projects. A project or account (including the sub-elements of an account) which has been specifically 

reduced by the Congress in acting on the budget request is considered to be a congressional interest item and as such, prior approval 

is required. Accordingly, no reprogrammings to an item specifically 

reduced below the threshold by the Congress are permitted. 

The reprogramming criteria that apply to military construction 

projects (25 percent of the funded amount or $2,000,000, whichever 

is less) continue to apply to new housing construction projects and 

to improvements over $2,000,000. To provide the services the flexibility to proceed with construction contracts without disruption or 

delay, the costs associated with environmental hazard remediation 

such as asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based paint removal or abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation 

requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the time of the 

budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects authorized in 

this budget year, as well as projects authorized in prior years for 

which construction has not been completed. 

Furthermore, in instances where prior approval to a reprogramming request for a project or account has been received from the 
8 

Committee, the adjusted amount approved becomes the new base 

for any future increase or decrease via below-threshold 

reprogrammings (provided that the project or account is not a congressional interest item as defined above). 

In addition to these guidelines, the services are directed to adhere to the guidance for military construction reprogrammings and 

notifications, including the pertinent statutory authorities contained in DOD Financial Management Regulation 7000.14–R and 

relevant updates and policy memoranda. 

REAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE

The Committee recommends a continuation of the following general rules for repairing a facility under ‘‘Operation and Maintenance’’ account funding: 

—Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement, 

and such replacement may be up to current standards or code. 

—Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional conversions 

must be performed as military construction projects. 

—Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects, as 

long as the final conjunctively funded project is a complete and 

usable facility. 

—The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day notification prior to carrying out any repair project with an estimated cost in excess of $7,500,000. 

The Department is directed to continue to report on the real 

property maintenance backlog at all installations for which there 

is a requested construction project in future budget requests. This 

information is to be provided on the Form 1390. In addition, for all 

troop housing requests, the Form 1391 is to continue to show all 

real property maintenance conducted in the past 2 years and all future requirements for unaccompanied housing at that installation. 

INCREMENTAL FUNDING

In general, the Committee supports full funding for military construction projects. However, it continues to be the practice of the 

Committee to provide incremental funding for certain large 

projects, despite administration policy to the contrary, to enable the 

services to more efficiently allocate military construction dollars 

among projects that can be executed in the year of appropriation. 

For fiscal year 2011, the Committee recommends incremental funding for the following projects: Aviation Task Force Complex, Fort 

Wainwright, Alaska; Technical Application Center, Patrick Air 

Force Base, Florida; Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility, Wiesbaden Air Base, Germany; and Ambulatory Care Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas. 

GLOBAL CHALLENGES

The Committee remains concerned about the status, scope and 

cost of the Defense Department’s global basing strategy, particularly in view of recent challenges facing the planned relocation of 

8,000 U.S. marines from Okinawa to Guam, and departmental reviews of the current basing strategy in Europe and elsewhere. In 
9 

the past year, as a result of the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review 

[QDR], the Department has launched several reviews of its global 

basing policy, including a ‘‘Front End Assessment’’ of global posture 

and other key investment areas in an effort to inform the fiscal 

year 2012 to 2016 budget process. 

The Committee welcomes these reviews and encourages the Department in particular to undertake comprehensive analyses of current basing plans in the European Command [EUCOM] and Pacific 

Command [PACOM], which are among the costliest and most complicated of the stationing plans now underway. The Committee also 

urges the Department to develop a long term mission plan and 

funding strategy for the Combined Joint Task Force–Horn of Africa 

[CJTF–HOA] in the Africa Command [AFRICOM]. 

Pending a review of the Department’s global basing posture and 

other considerations, the Committee recommends deferring 

$464,624,000 in funding requested in the fiscal year 2011 budget 

submission for overseas military construction in Djibouti, Germany, 

Guam, Honduras, Japan, and Korea. 

EUCOM.—The QDR has already had an impact on the European 

basing strategy, delaying a decision to return two Army brigade 

combat teams from Germany to the United States that was a key 

element of the 2004 global basing plan. According to the QDR, the 

Department will retain four brigade combat teams and a consolidated Army headquarters in Germany pending a review of the 

NATO Strategic Concept and an accompanying assessment of the 

U.S. defense posture in Europe. The NATO review is scheduled to 

be completed by November 2010. 

The Army, however, is moving forward with a robust military construction program in Germany, including $186,000,000 to support the planned consolidation of its European headquarters in 

Wiesbaden. In all, the fiscal year 2011 budget request includes 

$371,729,000 for Army military construction and family housing in 

Germany. 

The Government Accountability Office [GAO] is conducting a review of the Army’s transformation and consolidation of its forces 

and infrastructure in Europe. Based on preliminary information obtained by GAO, and the uncertainty of DOD’s basing strategy in 

Europe resulting from the recent QDR decisions, the Committee believes that Army basing in Europe and the consolidation of the 

Army’s European headquarters at Wiesbaden should be re-examined in light of the Department’s evolving strategic global posture 

concept, and that the Secretary of Defense should conduct a comprehensive review of alternatives for stationing forces in Europe. 

To ensure that all options have been considered and evaluated, 

the Committee has included bill language restricting the obligation 

or expenditure of fiscal year 2011 funding for Army military construction in Germany until the Department has completed an evaluation of the NATO Strategic Concept Review and an accompanying U.S. assessment of its defense posture in Europe, and a 

‘‘Front End Assessment’’ of the Department’s global posture for the 

fiscal year 2012 to 2016 program budget review cycle as directed 

by the Secretary of Defense in a May 11, 2010, memo to department heads. The Committee has also conditioned the funding on 

the submission to the congressional defense committees of a com-
10 

prehensive Army basing strategy for Europe based on those assessments, a project-based cost estimate and timeline to fully implement the strategy, and a certification of the requirement identified 

by the assessments for each of the Army military construction 

projects in Germany funded in the fiscal year 2011 bill. 

PACOM.—The Department has several major posture initiatives 

underway in the Pacific Command that collectively represent the 

largest restructuring and transformation of military posture in 

Asia since World War II. These initiatives, including the transformation of U.S. military forces and tour normalization in Korea, 

the Defense Policy Review Initiative [DPRI] in Japan, and the military buildup in Guam, will require billions in resource investments 

over many years if not decades to complete. These initiatives are 

complex projects with major sub-components, and involve the repositioning of the forward deployed U.S. military force structure, construction of hundreds of facilities, the movement of tens of thousands of military personnel and their families, and modifications to 

training resources and capacities throughout the Pacific region. In 

addition, the major components of each initiative are in some cases 

interrelated and interdependent to the extent that the successful 

completion of one component depends on the successful completion 

of other components of the initiative. Host nation contributions and 

host nation-led construction activities are expected to offset a large 

portion of the costs and produce many of the needed facilities, but 

those expected contributions and construction programs also cloud 

the transparency of the overall cost and schedule of the initiatives, 

create some uncertainty as to if and when the host nation-sponsored construction programs will be completed, and ultimately the 

potential financial requirements that the U.S. Government will be 

expected to support. These potential financial commitments span 

different appropriations, including military construction, operations 

and maintenance, and personnel accounts. 

The Guam military buildup is by far the largest of the PACOM 

posture initiatives. While supportive of the realignment of U.S. marines from Okinawa to Guam, the Committee continues to be concerned about the cost and magnitude of the construction program, 

the potential environmental impact on Guam, and the timeline to 

complete the realignment. 

The DPRI agreement between the United States and Japan is 

based on a strategy to consolidate U.S. forces on Japan to include 

relinquishing Marine Corps Air Station Futenma and moving a 

number of the associated units to Camp Schwab, on the northern 

coast of Okinawa. In addition, the agreement includes the move of 

8,000 marines and their estimated 9,000 dependants to Guam. According to the DPRI agreement, completion of the move to Guam 

and consolidation of units to Camp Schwab is scheduled to be concluded by the fall of 2014. However, given the delay in initiating 

the realignment, that deadline will be difficult, if not impossible, to 

meet. Recently, the political tensions on Okinawa regarding the 

move of U.S. marines to Camp Schwab proved to be the downfall 

of the Japanese prime minister when he failed to develop an alternative plan for the relocation and complete removal of U.S. forces 

from Okinawa. The newly appointed prime minister has faced political protest from the residents and elected officials in Okinawa 
11 

for acknowledging that the current agreement must go forward. 

However, Japan’s ruling party suffered heavy losses in recent parliamentary elections, due largely to economic concerns, which could 

weaken its ability to govern, and the Okinawa gubernatorial election scheduled for November could further cloud the future of the 

realignment process. As part of the move to Schwab, the Japanese 

have agreed to construct a new runway, also known as the 

Futenma Replacement Facility [FRF], along the coast of Henoko. 

The site, however, is currently underwater. The Japanese plan 

calls for the reclamation of land via landfill to build the new airstrip. In order to proceed with the airfield, the Governor of Okinawa must sign a landfill agreement. According to the DPRI, the 

United States will only take action to move the marines to Guam 

upon tangible progress being made to replace Futenma. The Department of Defense views the signing of the landfill agreement, 

which it considers tangible progress toward the completion of the 

FRF, as the linchpin for entire plan. The landfill permit was originally expected to be issued in August, but according the Defense 

Department officials, the permit will likely be delayed until after 

the gubernatorial election in November, and could be delayed into 

2011. 

Additional challenges exist on Guam relative to the move. The 

Committee continues to be concerned about the impact that the 

massive amount of planned construction will have on the already 

inadequate water, electrical, road, and wastewater infrastructure 

on the island. In addition, in June 2009, GAO reported that 

Guam’s existing utility infrastructure is not sufficient to meet 

DOD’s projected utility requirements without further upgrades. 

While funding and planning for the military portion of the buildup 

has been programmed, there continues to be a lack of funding resources to address these deficiencies in the civilian arena. The 

Committee’s concerns were echoed by the Environmental Protection 

Agency [EPA] when its review of the draft environmental impact 

statement [DEIS] was released in February. The EPA rated the 

Navy’s plan as ‘‘environmentally unsatisfactory.’’ The EPA also 

pointed out the negative impacts that will result with the buildup, 

specifically the impact dredging will have on the coral reef at Apra 

Harbor, and the increase in pollution levels on the island, most notably the increase in runoff from the multiple construction projects. 

The Navy has indicated that it is working with the EPA to address 

and mitigate EPA’s concerns before issuing the final EIS. Only 

after the EIS has been completed can the Navy sign the Record of 

Decision [ROD], which would potentially allow construction to 

begin, subject to possible legal challenges. 

To date, Congress has appropriated $363,800,000 for the Guam 

move while the Government of Japan has contributed 

$336,000,000. It is expected that the Japanese government will 

provide an additional $497,900,000, approved by the parliament 

earlier this year, in the near future. The President’s fiscal year 

2011 budget request for the Guam buildup is $452,200,000. However, of the $1,197,000,000 in United States and Japanese funding 

appropriated or approved for appropriation through fiscal year 

2010, only $50,900,000 for planning and design has been obligated. 

No military construction can be initiated until the ROD is signed, 
12 

and therefore none of the $300,200,000 in U.S. funding already appropriated for military construction has been obligated or expended. In light of the current delay in the obligation of previously 

appropriated funds for the Guam buildup, the Committee believes 

that providing additional funding in fiscal year 2011 for several of 

the requested projects is premature. For example, although the 

budget request includes $172,900,000 for the second increment of 

the North Ramp utilities and parking projects at Andersen Air 

Force Base, the Committee notes that $110,300,000 in U.S. funding 

was appropriated for the first increment of those projects in fiscal 

year 2010 and has yet to be obligated. In addition, the Government 

of Japan provided $27,000,000 for the projects in fiscal year 2009, 

which also has not been obligated. Additionally, the budget request 

includes $147,200,000 for site preparation and utilities for the new 

marine cantonment area at South Finegayan. The Government of 

Japan provided $124,800,000 for the project in fiscal year 2009. 

However, additional land is still required to complete the overall 

Finegayan construction plan. Based on these concerns, the Committee has deferred funding for the follow on increments of the 

North Ramp projects at Anderson and the utilities project at 

Finegayan. 

To address the environmental and utility infrastructure needs 

‘‘outside the gate’’ that are not under the direct auspices of the 

Navy, the Committee directs the Department of Defense to submit 

to the congressional defense committees, with the fiscal year 2012 

budget request, a report outlining the non-military infrastructure 

projects needed to support the temporary influx of workers and the 

permanent addition of military personnel and dependants on 

Guam, detailing the cost by project, the funding source for each 

project, and the planned timetable for each project. 

The Committee is equally concerned about the potential impact 

of the Korea Transformation Plan, which includes the consolidation 

of U.S. forces south of Seoul, the relocation of U.S. Forces Korea 

[USFK] headquarters from Yongson to Camp Humphries, and the 

‘‘tour normalization’’ plan to transition U.S. military deployments 

to Korea from 1-year unaccompanied tours to 3-year accompanied 

tours. According to testimony provided by the Commander, U.S. 

Forces Korea, and information provided through a Committee-sponsored GAO review of the U.S. global posture in Asia, USFK officials 

have estimated that the end-state expectation of tour normalization 

is that the 28,500 troops currently serving in Korea will be joined 

by 41,500 dependents, and 14,200 non-military personnel and their 

dependents, which would result in a need to support a total DOD 

population in Korea of approximately 84,000. Tour normalization is 

a three-phase plan, with the first phase to bring 4,100 families to 

Korea expected to be completed by the end of 2011. There is no 

timeline associated with the remaining two phases. 

To support tour normalization, the Army has developed a type of 

public/private housing plan, called the Humphries Housing Opportunity Plan, similar to military housing privatization in the United 

States. The Air Force plans to use military construction for family 

housing at Osan Air Force Base. Regardless of the plan, the ultimate cost of providing military family housing for the number of 

families expected to be stationed in Korea by the end of tour nor-
13 

malization is a major unknown, as is the extent and cost of providing supporting facilities, such as schools, hospitals, clinics, child 

care centers, and commissaries. 

The Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining a 

strong U.S. military presence in Korea to promote regional stability 

and serve as a deterrent to North Korea. The Committee also recognizes the Department’s long-term goal to phase out unaccompanied tours in Korea. However, the Committee is concerned that 

the Department not embark on a piecemeal approach to tour normalization without having an end-state master plan and cost estimate for all of the elements of the initiative, including military construction, family housing, operations and maintenance, and personnel costs, before proceeding beyond the initial stage. 

In order to provide Congress with comprehensive and routine information on the status of these major DOD posture initiatives in 

a manner that can be used to provide the appropriate context for 

budget deliberations and oversight, the Committee directs the Department to provide detailed annual updates on the status of posture restructuring initiatives in Korea, Japan, Guam, and the initiative that will address training capabilities and capacity in the 

Pacific region as an appendix to the annual DOD Global Posture 

Report. 

These initiative status updates should be provided annually, beginning with the submission of the fiscal year 2012 budget request, 

until the restructuring initiatives are complete and/or funding requirements to support them are satisfied. The initiative status updates should address the following areas: 

—Initiative Description—an overall description of each initiative, 

the major components of the initiative, the relationships between each component and the overall successful completion of 

the initiative, a program baseline that provides an estimated 

total cost of the initiative, expected completion date, and the 

basis for pursuing the initiative that is clearly linked to specific DOD strategic goals and objectives defined by the Secretary of Defense, Military Departments, Combatant Commander, or Service Component Commands. 

—DOD organization responsible for managing and executing the 

initiative. 

—Schedule Status—a comparison of the current estimated timeframe to complete the overall initiative and major components 

of the initiative with original baseline estimates and the currently approved schedule. An explanation of changes in the estimated completion date or changes in the approved schedule 

should be provided. 

—Facilities Requirements—a comparison of the baseline and current projected number of facilities required to provide appropriate work space, housing, and support services to the population DOD anticipates it will be supporting, including facilities, family housing, commissaries/post exchanges, schools, 

child care, clinics and hospitals, and any other facility that will 

be needed to support the military, civilian employee, local national employees, contractor, and retiree population. 

—Cost and Funding Status 
14 

—Cost Summary—a comparison of the baseline, approved program, and current estimated costs by appropriation; expressed in base year and then-year dollars, addressing all 

costs associated with establishing, modifying, and sustaining 

DOD’s posture under this initiative, including costs such as 

the housing allowance provided to military service members 

and families that are then paid to external organizations for 

housing. 

—Funding Summary—a listing of the funding profile, by appropriation, for the initiative, based on the current year 

President’s Budget detailing prior years, current year, future 

years defense program, and costs to complete; expressed in 

then-year dollars. All funding requirements associated with 

the initiative should be addressed, including, but not limited 

to military construction, operations and support, and personnel appropriations 

—Initiative Estimate Assumptions—the key assumptions that 

drive initiative cost and schedule estimates, including: 

—Population, including the number of military, civilian, nonDOD personnel, command sponsored families and dependants, non-command sponsored families and dependants, and 

military retirees affected by the initiative. 

—Housing, including the use of public/private partnerships to 

provide necessary facilities, percentage of personnel and dependents expected to reside in base housing and off the base 

or installation, availability of host nation land for construction of facilities, and the anticipated host nation funded and/ 

or provided housing construction. 

—Cost Estimating, including modeling used to predict costs, 

inflation estimates used for then-year dollar projections, and 

contracting strategy. 

—Financial, including the funding that will be available and 

provided by military services and other DOD agencies affected by the initiative to cover their respective costs, including the expected overseas base housing allowance that will 

be provided to military families. 

—Medical, including extent to which each military base or installation will have stand-alone medical treatment facilities, 

will share medical treatment facilities or capacity, the services provided (medical, dental, vision), dates new facilities 

will be available for use, ratio of primary care providers to 

population, and any other element that drives the number of 

medical treatment facilities and associated infrastructure or 

personnel required to support the population. 

—Education, including the estimated number of children per 

family, student distribution by grade level, tuition assistance 

that will be required/provided, assumptions used to develop 

related Department of Defense Education Activity [DODEA] 

cost factors, and any other element that drives the number 

of schools and associated infrastructure or personnel required to support the population. 

—Support Services, including capacities of commissaries, exchanges, USO, Red Cross or other support services or organizations, necessary modifications to their existing facilities, 
15 

and sources of funding necessary to pay for any needed improvements or new construction. 

—Local Community Support, including the extent to which 

local business, housing, medical treatment, education, and 

other support services will be available and necessary to support the expected DOD population. 

—Host Nation Agreements, including any specific agreements 

with host nations or legal issues that establish or drive specific timeframes for completion of the initiative or major components of the initiatives. 

AFRICOM.—The Committee understands that Camp Lemonier, 

Djibouti, has been identified as an enduring location for the Africa 

Command [AFRICOM] by the Secretary of Defense and as such is 

eligible for infrastructure improvements to support an enduring operation. However, the Committee is concerned about the future role 

of the Combined Joint Task Force–Horn of Africa [CJTF–HOA] and 

its impact on military construction requirements at Camp 

Lemonier. CJTF–HOA is the largest tenant at Camp Lemonier, encompassing about 52 percent of the camp’s personnel. According to 

DOD guidance, joint task forces are established to address specific, 

limited objectives, and are normally dissolved when their mission 

has been achieved or is no longer required. In an April 10, 2010, 

Government Accountability Office [GAO] report, ‘‘DOD Needs to 

Determine the Future of its Horn of Africa Task Force,’’ (GAO–10– 

504), GAO noted that AFRICOM ‘‘has not yet made decisions on 

the future of the task force—including whether CJTF–HOA should 

continue to exist as a joint task force’’ and is continuing to evaluate 

whether changes are necessary to its mission, structure, or resources to support AFRICOM’s mission of sustained security engagement in Africa. GAO also noted a number of challenges facing 

CJTF–HOA, including sustainable funding for its activities, African 

cultural issues, and interagency collaboration. According to the report, ‘‘the task force’s sustainability is uncertain because 

AFRICOM, in concert with the Department of Defense and the 

Navy, has not developed options for funding the task force over the 

long term.’’ GAO concluded that, ‘‘Until AFRICOM takes steps to 

examine feasible long-term funding options and develops a solution 

to increase the effectiveness and continuity of efforts among CJTF– 

HOA’s frequently rotating staff, the command cannot ensure that 

its task force is supporting U.S. efforts in Africa with the appropriate resources and trained personnel.’’ 

In response to the issues raised by GAO, the Defense Department asserted that it has identified a critical need for the task 

force and therefore does not need to determine whether it should 

be retained. DOD further noted that CJTF–HOA’s mission of countering violent extremism will remain its top priority for ‘‘years to 

come,’’ and said that the Department is working with the Navy and 

the Office of Management and Budget on long term funding options 

for the task force and Camp Lemonier. However, the Department 

did not establish a timeline or identify a plan to determine costs 

and future funding options for CJTF–HOA. The Committee therefore directs the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional 

defense committees, with submission of the fiscal year 2012 budget 

request, a comprehensive plan for the future of CJTF–HOA at 
16 

Camp Lemonier, including an updated evaluation of its mission, 

structure and resources; a future years funding plan, and a list, by 

project, of military construction needed to support the CJTF–HOA 

presence at Camp Lemonier through 2016. 

The Committee notes that the fiscal year 2011 budget request includes funding for two headquarters at Camp Lemonier, one for a 

Camp Lemonier Headquarters Facility and one for a CJTF–HOA 

Joint Operations Center and Headquarters. The Committee believes that it is both unnecessary and duplicative to build separate 

headquarters to support both missions on the same installation, 

not only in light of the uncertainty surrounding the future of 

CJTF–HOA but also because of the unique link between Camp 

Lemonier and CJTF–HOA. As GAO reported, ‘‘AFRICOM and 

CJTF–HOA officials told us that Camp Lemonier and CJFGT–HOA 

are separate entities and that the camp could very well endure 

even if the task force does not, but the two are integrally linked.’’ 

It would seem to the Committee that a joint headquarters would 

facilitate that operational link. 

During budget briefings on the fiscal year 2011 AFRICOM military construction budget request, the Committee directed 

AFRICOM to submit a plan for a single headquarters to accommodate both the Camp Lemonier enduring operations and the CJTF– 

HOA operations. The Committee has yet to receive the plan, and 

thus has denied funding for a separate headquarters to accommodate the current CJTF–HOA mission. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $3,719,419,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 4,078,798,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 3,797,521,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The military construction appropriation for the Army provides for 

acquisition, construction, installation, and equipment of temporary 

or permanent public works, military installations, facilities, and 

real property for the Army. This appropriation also provides for facilities required as well as funds for infrastructure projects and 

programs required to support bases and installations around the 

world. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $3,797,521,000 for the Army for fis- cal year 2011. This amount is $78,102,000 above the fiscal year 

2010 enacted level, and $281,277,000 below the budget request. 

Further detail of the Committee’s recommendation is provided in 

the State table at the end of this report. 

Museum Support Facilities.—The budget request included 

$74,800,000 for three museum operations support buildings at 

Army installations. The Committee recognizes the need to preserve 

Army artifacts and make them available for display in publically 

accessible museums. However, the Committee notes that there are 

no museums at the installations for which the museum support facilities are proposed. The Committee believes that museum support 

centers should be collocated with privately funded museums on 
17 

Army installations in order to fulfill their dual mission of preservation and education. The Committee, therefore, recommends deferring funding for these facilities until the Army can coordinate with 

private entities for the construction of museums at these locations. 

SOUTHCOM Commissary.—The budget request included $19,000,000 to build a commissary at the U.S. Southern Command 

[SOUTHCOM] headquarters in the city of Doral in Miami-Dade 

County, Florida. The Committee eliminated funding for this 

project, noting that, according to SOUTHCOM, there are approximately 80 grocery stores, ranging from specialty markets to big box 

stores, within close proximity to the SOUTHCOM headquarters, 

and there are no barracks and no family housing at SOUTHCOM 

headquarters. In general, commissary construction and operations 

are funded through the Defense Commissary Agency [DECA] surcharge fund. However, the use of those funds is constrained by certain regulations. The Committee is concerned that those regulations may be too restrictive and directs the Secretary of Defense to 

review the policies of the DECA with regard to the construction of 

new commissaries on existing installations. 

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects 

to be awarded as early in fiscal year 2011 as practical: 

Defense Access Road, Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii.—Of the 

funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $1,200,000 be made available for the design of 

this facility. 

Physical Fitness Center, Fort Richardson, Alaska.—Of the funds 

provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee 

directs that $2,700,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

Chapel, Sand Hill, Fort Benning, Georgia.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $550,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $3,769,003,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 3,879,104,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 3,667,922,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The military construction appropriation for the Navy and Marine 

Corps provides for acquisition, construction, installation, and equipment of temporary or permanent public works, naval installations, 

facilities, and real property for the Navy and the Marine Corps. 

This appropriation also provides for facilities required as well as 

funds for infrastructure projects and programs required to support 

bases and installations around the world. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $3,667,922,000 for Navy and Marine 

Corps military construction for fiscal year 2011. This amount is 

$101,081,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level, and 

$211,182,000 below the budget request. Further detail of the Committee’s recommendation is provided in the State table at the end 

of this report. 
18 

The Committee fully expects a contract for the following project 

to be awarded as early in fiscal year 2011 as practical: 

Security Upgrades, NAS Fallon, Nevada.—Of the funds provided 

for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that 

$1,480,000 be made available for this project. 

USNS Comfort.— Prior to making a determination to shift USNS 

Comfort’s homeport, the Navy shall conduct a cost-benefit analysis 

and study of the impact of such a shift on USNS Comfort’s wartime 

and humanitarian missions and the manning of the military medical facilities which provide USNS Comfort’s medical staff. The Secretary of the Navy shall certify that a homeport shift does not negatively impact cost, mission, or medical staffing flexibility. The 

Navy shall provide this study to the congressional defense committees. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $1,450,426,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 1,311,385,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,378,688,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The military construction appropriation for the Air Force provides for acquisition, construction, installation, and equipment of 

temporary or permanent public works, military installations, facilities, and real property for the Air Force. This appropriation also 

provides for facilities required as well as funds for infrastructure 

projects and programs required to support bases and installations 

around the world. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $1,378,688,000 for the Air Force in 

fiscal year 2011. This amount is $71,738,000 below the fiscal year 

2010 enacted level, and $67,303,000 above the budget request. Further detail of the Committee’s recommendation is provided in the 

State table at the end of this report. 

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects 

to be awarded as early in fiscal year 2011 as practical: 

Civil Engineer Complex, Mountain Home AFB, Idaho.—Of the 

funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for the construction of this project. 

Simulation Facility Expansion, Minneapolis-St. Paul IAP, Minnesota.—Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,900,000 be made available for 

the construction of this project. 

Facility Repair/Fitness Recreation Center, Nellis Air Force Base, 

Nevada.—Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $867,000 be made available for 

the construction of this facility. 

Fire Station, Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 
19 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE

(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $3,093,679,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 3,118,062,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 3,241,601,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The military construction appropriation for the Department of 

Defense provides for acquisition, construction, installation, and 

equipment of temporary or permanent public works, military installations, facilities, and real property Defense-Wide. This appropriation also provides for facilities required as well as funds for infrastructure projects and programs required to support bases and 

installations around the world. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $3,241,601,000 for projects considered within the ‘‘Defense-Wide’’ account in fiscal year 2011. This 

amount is $147,922,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level 

and $123,539,000 above the budget request. Further detail of the 

Committee’s recommendation is provided in the State table at the 

end of this report. 

The Committee fully expects a contract for the following project 

to be awarded as early in fiscal year 2011 as practical: 

Health Clinic Replacement, Gulfport, Mississippi.—Of the funds 

provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee 

directs that $2,700,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION

The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for the Secretary of Defense ‘‘Contingency Construction’’ account, equal to the request. 

This account provides funds which may be used by the Secretary 

of Defense for unforeseen facility requirements and military exercises, including those related to overseas contingency operations. 

ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM

The Committee recommends $290,000,000 for the Energy Conservation Investment Program [ECIP] plus $10,000,000 for planning and design. This amount is $180,000,000 above the budget request, including planning and design. 

The Department of Defense accounts for nearly 80 percent of the 

Federal Government’s total energy consumption. Energy consumption on military installations makes up approximately 25 percent 

of that total. According to testimony before this Committee on 

March 11, 2010, by Dr. Dorothy Robyn, Deputy Under Secretary of 

Defense for Installations and Environment, the Department spent 

$3,800,000,000 in 2009 to power its installations, including non-tactical vehicles used at installations. Although installation energy 

consumption represents only 28 percent of the Department’s total 

energy costs, installations produce nearly 40 percent of DOD’s 

greenhouse gas emissions. 
20 

ECIP is the only dedicated funding stream for installation energy 

projects and was originally intended as a mechanism to fund numerous small energy conservation projects with a rapid payback 

period and strong savings to investment ratio. Although military 

construction and sustainment, restoration, and modernization funding can be—and is being—used for more costly renewable energy 

projects, it remains a fact that energy related projects face stiff 

competition from mission critical and quality of life projects for 

those funds. 

The Committee strongly supports investment in ECIP as a 

means to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas production on military installations, and to promote energy security and 

investment in renewable energy. In the past 2 years, the Committee has more than doubled the amount of funding requested for 

ECIP, providing a total of $394,209,000. Although the budget requests for ECIP have been generally growing over the past several 

years, reaching $120,000,000 for fiscal year 2011, the funding level 

remains inadequate to fully support the ambitious installationbased energy efficiency goals of the Department, which include the 

goal of reducing energy use by 30 percent by fiscal year 2015, and 

meeting 25 percent of installation energy needs with renewable energy sources by 2025. 

The Committee is encouraged by the Department’s investment of 

a portion of the fiscal year 2011 funding requested for ECIP into 

energy test bed projects, intended to demonstrate next generation 

technologies being developed by industry, university, and Department of Energy laboratories. The Committee also commends the 

Department for partnering with the Department of Energy [DOE] 

to produce a memorandum of understanding [MOU] identifying 

strategies to strengthen and coordinate efforts to enhance national 

energy security. The intent of the collaboration is to accelerate the 

deployment of DOE technologies and expertise, using DOD installations as test beds to demonstrate and create a market for innovative energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies coming 

out of DOE laboratories. A specific goal of the MOU is to develop 

joint initiatives, including pilot or demonstration projects on DOD 

installations, to address both military and national energy security 

needs. 

Although the MOU does not identify a funding source for either 

agency, the Committee believes that ECIP would be a logical 

source of funds to leverage DOD’s investment in joint DOD-DOE 

projects. The Committee is aware of many energy efficiency, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas reduction projects throughout the 

Department and the services, ranging from major solar, wind, and 

geothermal power generation plants to photovoltaic and green roof 

projects to net zero energy buildings. In an effort to facilitate a holistic approach to assessing best practices, applying today’s best 

technologies, and fielding next generation technologies, the Committee directs that of the additional funding provided in this account, the top priority for its use shall be the establishment of installation-wide demonstration projects on one or more bases. These 

demonstration projects should include, but not be limited to, on-site 

renewable energy production or purchasing; solar thermal and 

solar photovoltaic applications; electrical and thermal storage; 
21 

micro grid and smart grid technologies; green and white roof technologies; metering of utilities; digital control and sensors on new 

equipment systems; energy information management systems for 

control, data collection and analysis, including transmission of energy data via network infrastructure, such as wirelessly over commercially available digital cellular networks, if appropriate; and 

emerging energy efficiency, water conservation, and clean energy 

technologies from DOE, industry, or university laboratories, with 

the goal of achieving a carbon friendly, and if possible, net zero energy installation. The Secretary of Defense is to submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive plan, including 

project details; description of participation with DOE or other laboratories; energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction goals; 

performance measurements; timeline, and cost estimate for the 

demonstration project or projects no later than 180 days after enactment of this act. 

Green Building Technologies.—The Committee strongly supports 

the efforts of the Department to incorporate green building technologies into both new construction and renovations of buildings. 

As noted in the past, the Committee believes that these technologies should be a fundamental consideration in the design or 

retrofit of all military construction projects. Although federally 

mandated sustainable design policies and energy efficiency goals 

are standard elements of military construction design, the Committee encourages the Department and the services to exceed the 

basic standards and incorporate leading edge technologies into the 

construction program. In particular, the Committee believes that 

the Department should maximize the use of energy efficient, ecofriendly roofing technologies for new construction and renovations, 

including family housing construction and renovation. These technologies include, but are not limited to, photovoltaic panels, solar 

thermal roof coatings, green roofs, and cool roofs. The Committee 

commends the U.S. Marine Corps for establishing a policy that, beginning with the 2012 military construction program, all new 

building construction and renovations involving complete roof replacements will incorporate roof-top solar, thermal, photovoltaic, 

and energy reducing coating technologies into the project. In an effort to capture the most innovative of these technologies, the Committee encourages the Department and the services to monitor new 

technologies emerging from government, industry, or university research and development programs. 

In the report accompanying the fiscal year 2010 military construction bill, the Committee directed the Secretary of Defense to 

submit, with the fiscal 2011 budget request, a report on the steps 

being taken to incorporate new roofing technologies into the fiscal 

year 2010 and 2011 military construction program. The Committee 

understands that the required data are not readily available but 

will be included in the fiscal year 2010 Annual Energy Management Report, which is due in January 2011. The Committee directs 

the Department to transmit a copy of that report to the congressional defense committees immediately upon availability. 

DODEA School Initiative.—The President’s budget request includes $345,142,000 for the construction of 10 Department of Defense Educational Activity [DODEA] elementary and high schools 
22 

as part of a major initiative to recapitalize the Department’s network of aging and inadequate schools on a number of military installations in the United States and overseas. In addition to the 

schools included in the fiscal year 2011 budget request, the Department has embarked on an ambitious program to replace or renovate an additional 106 schools through fiscal year 2015. The Committee views this initiative as a unique opportunity to incorporate 

advanced energy efficiency features, including the orientation of 

buildings and sources of light to optimize energy efficiency; water 

and wastewater conservation measures; renewable energy resources including solar, geothermal, and wind power where possible; smart grid technologies, and green and white roof technologies, as both a contribution to the Department’s energy efficiency and carbon reduction goals and as a teaching tool and learning laboratory for the Department of Defense educational community. The Committee directs DODEA to provide, within 60 days of 

enactment of this act, a detailed description of the energy efficiency 

and carbon reduction technologies incorporated into the design of 

the schools funded in the fiscal year 2011 request. Additionally, 

DODEA is directed to provide, with the submission of the fiscal 

year 2012 budget request, a detailed plan for incorporating into 

each school included in the request site-specific advanced energy 

and water efficiency measures, including, but not limited to, renewable energy opportunities, smart grid technologies, green roof and 

other carbon reduction measures, and an assessment of the feasibility of constructing a net zero energy facility. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, RESERVE COMPONENTS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $1,622,991,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 1,438,214,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,739,831,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The military construction appropriation for Reserve components 

provides for acquisition, construction, expansion, rehabilitation, 

and conversion of facilities for the training and administration of 

the Reserve components. This appropriation also provides for facilities required as well as funds for infrastructure projects and programs required to support bases and installations. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $1,739,831,000 for military construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components for fiscal 

year 2011. This amount is $116,840,000 above the fiscal year 2010 

enacted level and $301,617,000 above the budget request. Further 

detail of the Committee’s recommendation is provided in the State 

table at the end of this report. 

The Committee recommends approval of military construction, 

Reserve components, as outlined in the following table: 
23 

RESERVE COMPONENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Component Budget request Committee 

recommendation 

Army National Guard .......................................................................................................... 873,664 980,072 

Air National Guard .............................................................................................................. 176,986 337,454 

Army Reserve ...................................................................................................................... 318,175 347,916 

Navy Reserve ....................................................................................................................... 61,557 61,557 

Air Force Reserve ................................................................................................................ 7,832 12,832 

Total ....................................................................................................................... 1,438,214 1,739,831 

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects 

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2011 as practical: 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

Regional Training Institute, Camp Robinson, Arkansas.—Of the 

funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $1,900,000 be made available for the design of 

this facility. 

Photovoltaic Solar Power System, Mather AASF, California.—Of 

the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,466,000 be made available for this project. 

Photovoltaic Solar Power System, Ventura AFRC, California.—Of 

the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,466,000 be made available for this project. 

Photovoltaic Solar Power System, Los Alamitos AFRC, California.—Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,466,000 be made available for 

this project. 

Photovoltaic Solar Power System, Banning RC, California.—Of 

the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,466,000 be made available for this project. 

Add/Alter Security Police Facility—Bud Day Field, Sioux City, 

Iowa.—Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,950,000 be made available for 

the construction of this facility. 

Renovation and Alteration, Chicopee Armory, Massachusetts.—Of 

the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,554,000 be made available for this project to 

accommodate the stationing of the C/1–20th Special Forces Group. 

Add/Alter Armory, Bloomington, Minnesota.—Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs 

that $1,986,000 be made available for the construction of this facility. 

Range Modernization, Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada.—Of the 

funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for this project. 

Road Infrastructure, Joint Forces Headquarters, Omaha, Nebraska.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this ac- count, the Committee directs that $240,000 be made available for 

the design of this project. 

Battalion Readiness Center, Quonset State Airport, Rhode Island.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this ac-
24 

count, the Committee directs that $3,729,000 be made available for 

the design of this facility. 

Armory Addition, Middletown, Rhode Island.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $302,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

Firing Range and Support Facilities, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $151,000 be made available for 

the design of this facility. 

Modification of Army Aviation Support Facility, Fort Lewis, 

Washington.—Of the funds provided for minor construction in this 

account, the Committee directs that $473,000 be made available for 

the construction of this facility. 

Emergency Generator and Supporting Facilities, Eleanor ARNG 

Complex, West Virginia.—Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $2,000,000 be 

made available for this project. 

Mail/ID Center, Camp Dawson, West Virginia.—Of the funds 

provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,990,000 be made available for the construction of this 

facility. 

Utility Upgrade, Camp Dawson, West Virginia.—Of the funds 

provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,980,000 be made available for the construction of this 

project. 

JITEC Emergency Power Generator and Supporting Facilities, 

Camp Dawson, West Virginia.—Of the funds provided for minor 

construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,999,000 

be made available for the construction of this project. 

Parachute Rigging Facility, Morgantown, West Virginia.—Of the 

funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $1,000,000 be made available for the design of 

this facility. 

Field Maintenance Shop, Buckhannon, West Virginia.—Of the 

funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $1,500,000 be made available for the design of 

this facility. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR NATIONAL GUARD

Road Infrastructure, Joint Forces Headquarters, Omaha, Nebraska.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $210,000 be made available for 

the design of this project. 

Renovations for Building 2, Blue Ash ANG Station, Ohio.—Of the 

funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for this project. 

Alert Facility, Joint Reserve Base, New Orleans.—Of the funds 

provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee 

directs that $2,000,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 
25 

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION

SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $197,414,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 258,884,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 258,884,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] appropriation 

provides for the U.S. cost share of the NATO Security Investment 

Program for the acquisition and construction of military facilities 

and installations (including international military headquarters) 

and for related expenses for the collective defense of the NATO 

Treaty area. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $258,884,000 for the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization Security Investment Program [NSIP] for fiscal 

year 2011 as requested. This amount is $61,470,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

The Committee recognizes the importance and multiplier effect of 

NATO common funding for joint-use military construction projects 

in Europe and the United States as well as in support of the war 

in Afghanistan. It is noteworthy that approximately one-half of the 

current NSIP budget is directed toward investments to support 

NATO military operations in Afghanistan. However, the Committee 

is concerned about the growing proportion of the annual NSIP 

budget that is being devoted to nonconstruction items, such as communications equipment, information technology systems, and mobile tracking systems. 

The primary purpose of NSIP is to provide a common funding 

source to share the burden of costly construction projects that contribute to the security of the Alliance. According to current NSIP 

expenditure documents, however, approximately 50 percent of annual NSIP funding is being used for nonconstruction purposes. Although NSIP funds may be used for a wide array of NATO support 

functions, the Committee is concerned that the current trend may 

allow scarce construction funds to be siphoned off for other activities, thus delaying funding for needed military construction 

projects. In addition, this Committee does not have oversight over 

nonconstruction expenditures or requirements, and therefore cannot determine if the NSIP funding being used for these activities 

is a validated common funding requirement or is duplicative of 

other investments. 

The Committee believes that it may be more transparent and appropriate to provide funding for NSIP construction and nonconstruction activities in separate accounts under the jurisdiction 

of the appropriate subcommittees. The Committee therefore directs 

the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report to accompany the fiscal year 2012 budget request on the proportion of construction vs. nonconstruction funding 

in the fiscal year 2012 NSIP budget request and a recommendation 

for funding nonconstruction activities that ensures both transparency and accountability. 
26 

FAMILY HOUSING OVERVIEW

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $2,258,698,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 1,823,191,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,823,191,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Family Housing appropriation provides funds for military 

family housing construction activities, operation and maintenance, 

the Family Housing Improvement Fund, and the Homeowners Assistance Program. Construction accounts provide funding for new 

construction, improvements and the Federal Government share of 

housing privatization. Operation and maintenance accounts fund 

costs associated with the maintenance and leasing of military family housing, including utilities, services, management and furnishings. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $1,823,191,000 for family housing 

construction, operations and maintenance, and the Department’s 

family housing improvement and homeowners assistance funds for 

fiscal year 2011. 

FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, ARMY

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $273,236,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 92,369,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 92,369,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The family housing appropriation for the Army provides for expenses of family housing for construction, including acquisition, replacement, addition, expansion, extension, and alteration. This appropriation provides for the financing of all costs for construction, 

improvements and leasing of all Army housing. In addition to quality of life enhancements, the program contains initiatives to reduce 

operating costs and conserve energy by upgrading or replacing facilities which can be made more efficient through relatively modest 

investments in improvements. The Department of Defense is authorized to use limited partnerships, make direct and guaranteed 

loans, and convey Department-owned property to stimulate the private sector to increase the availability of affordable, quality housing for the Army. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $92,369,000 for family housing construction, Army, including construction improvements, in fiscal 

year 2011. This amount is $180,867,000 below the fiscal year 2010 

enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $57,369,000 for new construction, as 

shown below: 
27 

ARMY FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project title Budget request Committee recommendation 

Alaska ................. Fort Wainwright ..... Family Housing Replacement Construction .... 21,000 21,000 

Germany .............. Baumholder ........... Family Housing Replacement Construction .... 34,329 34,329 

Worldwide ............ Various Locations .. Planning and Design ....................................... 2,040 2,040 

Total ...... ................................ .......................................................................... 57,369 57,369 

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts 

provided for construction improvements: 

ARMY CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project title Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Pennsylvania .......... Carlisle Barracks Family Housing Privatization ........................... 15,000 15,000 

Virginia ................... Fort Eustis .......... Family Housing Privatization ........................... 20,000 20,000 

Total .......... ............................. .......................................................................... 35,000 35,000 

FAMILY HOUSING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $523,418,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 518,140,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 518,140,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The family housing operation and maintenance appropriation for 

the Army provides for the operation and maintenance of family 

housing. This includes debt payment, leasing, minor construction, 

principal and interest charges, and insurance premiums of Army 

family housing. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $518,140,000 for family housing operation and maintenance, Army for fiscal year 2011. This amount 

is $5,278,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to 

the budget request. 

FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $146,569,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 186,444,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 186,444,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The family housing appropriation for the Navy and Marine Corps 

provides for expenses of family housing for construction, including 

acquisition, replacement, addition, expansion, extension, and alteration. This appropriation provides for the financing of all costs for 

construction, improvements, and leasing of all Navy and Marine 

Corps housing. In addition to quality of life enhancements, the pro-
28 

gram contains initiatives to reduce operating costs and conserve 

energy by upgrading or replacing facilities which can be made more 

efficient through relatively modest investments in improvements. 

The Department of Defense is authorized to use limited partnerships, make direct and guaranteed loans, and convey Departmentowned property to stimulate the private sector to increase the 

availability of affordable, quality housing for the Navy and Marine 

Corps. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $186,444,000 for family housing 

construction, Navy and Marine Corps, including construction improvements, in fiscal year 2011. This amount is $39,875,000 above 

the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $40,424,000 for new construction, as 

shown below: 

NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project title Budget request Committee 

recommendation 

Cuba ................... Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay.

Replace Base Housing, 71 Units at Various 

Sites.

37,169 37,169 

Worldwide ............ Various Locations .. Planning and Design ....................................... 3,255 3,255 

Total ...... ................................ .......................................................................... 40,424 40,424 

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts 

provided for construction improvements: 

NAVY AND MARINE CORPS CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project title Budget request Committee 

recommendation 

California ............ MCB Camp Pendleton.Camp Pendleton PPV Phase 8 ........................ 26,748 26,748 

North Carolina .... Camp Lejuene ........ Camp Lejeune PPV Phase 7 with DODDS addition.79,908 79,908 

Washington, D.C. Marine Barracks 

8th & I.

Replace Interior Passenger Lift Quarters #6 .. 100 100 

Japan .................. CFA Sasebo ............ Revitalization of Family Housing Townhomes.10,769 10,769 

Japan .................. CFA Yokosuka ........ Revitalization of Family Housing Apartments.17,479 17,479 

Japan .................. Marine Corps Air 

Station Iwakuni.

Whole House Revitalization Midrise 906 ......... 11,016 11,016 

Total ...... ................................ .......................................................................... 146,020 146,020 
29 

FAMILY HOUSING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY AND

MARINE CORPS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $368,540,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 366,346,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 366,346,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The family housing operation and maintenance appropriation for 

the Navy and Marine Corps provides for the operation and maintenance of family housing. This includes debt payment, leasing, 

minor construction, principal and interest charges, and insurance 

premiums of Navy and Marine Corps family housing. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $366,346,000 for family housing operation and maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 

2011. This amount is $2,194,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted 

level and equal to the budget request. 

FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $66,101,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 78,025,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 78,025,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The family housing appropriation for the Air Force provides for 

expenses of family housing for construction, including acquisition, 

replacement, addition, expansion, extension, and alteration. This 

appropriation provides for the financing of all costs for construction, improvements and leasing of all Air Force housing. In addition to quality of life enhancements, the program contains initiatives to reduce operating costs and conserve energy by upgrading 

or replacing facilities which can be made more efficient through relatively modest investments in improvements. The Department of 

Defense is authorized to use limited partnerships, make direct and 

guaranteed loans, and convey Department-owned property to stimulate the private sector to increase the availability of affordable, 

quality housing for the Air Force. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $78,025,000 for family housing construction, Air Force, in fiscal year 2011. This amount is 

$11,924,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to 

the budget request. 

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts 

provided for construction improvements: 
30 

AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project title Budget request Committee recommendation 

Japan ...................... Kadena AB ................... Improve Family Housing, Phase 11 

(403 units).

73,800 73,800 

Worldwide ............... Various ......................... Planning and Design ............................. 4,225 4,225 

Total .......... ...................................... ................................................................ 78,025 78,025 

FAMILY HOUSING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $502,936,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 513,792,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 513,792,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The family housing operation and maintenance appropriation for 

the Air Force provides for the operation and maintenance of family 

housing. This includes debt payment, leasing, minor construction, 

principal and interest charges, and insurance premiums of Air 

Force family housing. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $513,792,000 for family housing operation and maintenance, Air Force, in fiscal year 2011. This 

amount is $10,856,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level, and 

equal to the budget request. 

FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $2,859,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... ........................... 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ........................... 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends no funding for family housing construction, Defense-Wide, in fiscal year 2011 as requested by the 

President. 

FAMILY HOUSING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $49,214,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 50,464,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 50,464,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The family housing operation and maintenance appropriation for 

Defense-Wide provides for the operation and maintenance of family 

housing. This includes debt payment, leasing, minor construction, 

principal and interest charges, and insurance premiums of Defense 

family housing. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $50,464,000 for family housing operation and maintenance, Defense-Wide for fiscal year 2011. This 
31 

amount is $1,250,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and 

equal to the budget request. 

FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $2,600,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 1,096,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,096,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The family housing improvement appropriation provides for the 

Department of Defense to undertake housing initiatives and to provide an alternative means of acquiring and improving military family housing and supporting facilities. This account provides seed 

money for housing privatization initiatives. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $1,096,000 for the Family Housing 

Improvement Fund for fiscal year 2011. This amount is $1,504,000 

below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget 

request. 

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $323,225,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 16,515,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 16,515,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Homeowners Assistance Program [HAP] provides funds to 

assist eligible military personnel and civilian Federal employee 

homeowners who sustain a loss on the sale of their primary residence due to a declining residential real estate market attributable 

to the closure or realignment of a military installation. In 2009, the 

HAP was expanded to provide mortgage relief to wounded warriors 

and spouses of fallen warriors, and to provide temporary mortgage 

relief to all military and qualified civilian personnel required by 

the Department to relocate who sustained losses on the sale of 

their homes due to the mortgage crisis. Program expenses include 

payments to homeowners for losses on private sales; cost of judicial 

foreclosure; property acquisition by liquidating and/or assuming 

outstanding mortgages; partial payment of homeowners’ lost equity 

on Government acquisitions; retirement of debt after sale of properties when the Government assumes mortgages; and administrative expenses. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $16,515,000 for the Homeowners 

Assistance Program for fiscal year 2011. This amount is equal to 

the budget request. In response to the current mortgage crisis, 

Public Law 111–5, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 

of 2009, included a provision to temporarily expand the HAP 

through 2012 to military and certain civilian personnel and their 

families who receive orders to relocate and cannot sell their homes 

or face steep losses as a result of the severe national economic 
32 

downturn, not solely because of a BRAC action. The provision also 

extends the program permanently to wounded warriors who must 

relocate for medical reasons or to surviving spouses of fallen warriors. 

Through the ARRA and the fiscal year 2010 military construction 

appropriations bill, the Committee has provided a total of 

$855,000,000 to fully fund the projected cost of the expanded HAP 

program. However, given the popularity of the program, the higher 

than anticipated individual claim awards, and the continued weakness in the housing market, the Committee is concerned about the 

accuracy of the funding projections and the adequacy of the current 

funding level, particularly in light of the fact that the Department 

did not request any additional funds for the expanded HAP program in its fiscal year 2011 budget submission. Therefore, the 

Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide to the congressional defense committees, within 60 days of enactment of this 

act, a comprehensive report on the status of the expanded HAP 

program through the end of fiscal year 2010. The report shall provide the following information: (1) the number of claims filed and 

the number adjudicated; (2) the total dollar amount of claims filed, 

and the total dollar amount of payments against those claims; (3) 

the unobligated balances remaining available for the payments of 

expanded HAP benefits; (4) the projected expenditure of the unobligated funds by category (e.g. permanent change of station, wounded warrior, BRAC impact waiver) and timeline; (5) an updated projection of the number of claims expected through 2012; (6) the estimated cost to fully fund the program through 2012 at the optimal 

level of benefits; and (7) the projected shortfall in funds, if any, to 

provide the optimal level of benefits. 

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $151,541,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 124,971,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 124,971,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This account provides funding for design and construction of fullscale chemical disposal facilities and associated projects to upgrade 

installation support facilities and infrastructure required to support the Chemical Demilitarization Program. This account was established starting in fiscal year 2005 to comply with section 141(b) 

of the fiscal year 2003 National Defense Authorization Act. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $124,971,000 for chemical demilitarization construction projects for fiscal year 2011, a decrease of 

$26,570,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to 

the President’s budget request. 

The Committee continues to urge the Department to take all necessary and appropriate steps to dispose of the U.S. chemical weapons stockpile by the 2012 Chemical Weapons Convention deadline 

and, under no circumstances, later than 2017 consistent with section 8119 of Public Law 110–116. In light of the need for the Department to carry out its mission promptly and safely it will need 
33 

to provide close oversight over the execution of contracts at the 

chemical demilitarization sites to ensure funds are spent prudently 

and efficiently. The Committee will continue to monitor closely the 

Department’s compliance with both deadlines. 

BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990 

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $496,768,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 360,474,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 360,474,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The base closure appropriation (1990) provides for clean up and 

disposal of property consistent with the four closure rounds required by the base closure acts of 1988 and 1990. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends a total of $360,474,000 for the Base 

Closure Account 1990 for fiscal year 2011. This amount is 

$136,294,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to 

the President’s budget request. 

BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW

From fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2010, a total of 

$24,971,667,000 has been appropriated for the environmental clean 

up of military installations closed or realigned under prior BRAC 

rounds. The total amount appropriated for BRAC 1990, combined 

with the Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2011, is 

$25,332,141,000. 

In appropriating these funds, the Committee continues to provide 

the Department with broad flexibility to allocate funds by service, 

function, and installation. The following table displays the total 

amount appropriated for each round of base closure, including 

amounts recommended for fiscal year 2011 for BRAC 1990. 

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, 1990 

[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2011] 

1990–2009 

Fiscal year 

Total 2010 

enacted 

2011 Committee recommendation 

Part I ..................................................... $2,684,577,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) $2,684,577,000 

Part II .................................................... 4,915,636,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 4,915,636,000 

Part III ................................................... 7,269,267,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 7,269,267,000 

Part IV ................................................... 9,605,419,000 $496,768,000 $360,474,000 10,462,661,000 

Total ........................................ 24,474,899,000 496,768,000 360,474,000 25,322,141,000 

1 Not Applicable. 

BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005 

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $7,455,498,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 2,354,285,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,354,285,000 
34 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The base realignment and closure appropriation for 2005 provides for clean up and disposal of property consistent with the 2005 

closure round required by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends a total of $2,354,285,000 for the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 for fiscal year 

2011. This amount is $5,101,213,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

The following chart details projects to be carried out using BRAC 

2005 funding. The Committee continues to direct that any abovethreshold cost or scope variation, any cancellation of projects, or 

any transfer of funds among construction projects associated with 

the BRAC 2005 projects identified in the table following this narrative be subject to the standard reprogramming and notification 

requirements that apply to the regular military construction appropriation. 
35 

BRAC 2005 PROJECTS 

[Dollars in thousands] 

State Service Location Commission recommendation Project Amount 

Maryland .................................................................. Agency—TMA ........ Bethesda (WRNMMC) ............. 169 ............... Traffic Mitigation, Increment 2 ................................................................. $7,600 Maryland .................................................................. Agency—TMA ........ Bethesda (WRNMMC) ............. 169 ............... Defense Access Roads—Medical Center Entrance .................................. 20,000 Texas ........................................................................ Agency—TMA ........ Fort Sam Houston .................. 172 ............... San Antonio Military Medical Center (North), Increment 4 ...................... 93,941 Virginia .................................................................... Agency—NGA ........ Fort Belvoir ............................ 168 ............... NGA Headquarters Facility ........................................................................ 83,328 Virginia .................................................................... Agency—TMA ........ Fort Belvoir ............................ 169 ............... Hospital Replacement, Increment 5 ......................................................... 63,637 Virginia .................................................................... Agency—WHS ........ Fort Belvoir ............................ 133 ............... Office Complex, Increment 4 .................................................................... 5,610 

Total MILCON .............................................. ................................ ................................................ ...................... .................................................................................................................... 274,116 

Various ..................................................................... Army ....................... Various ................................... ...................... Environmental ........................................................................................... 73,511 Various ..................................................................... Navy ....................... Various ................................... ...................... Environmental ........................................................................................... 15,201 Various ..................................................................... Air Force ................ Various ................................... ...................... Environmental ........................................................................................... 19,555 Various ..................................................................... Defense-wide ......... Various ................................... ...................... Environmental ........................................................................................... ....................

Total Environmental ................................... ................................ ................................................ ...................... .................................................................................................................... 108,267 

Various ..................................................................... Army ....................... Various ................................... ...................... Operation and Maintenance ...................................................................... 887,231 Various ..................................................................... Navy ....................... Various ................................... ...................... Operation and Maintenance ...................................................................... 321,888 Various ..................................................................... Air Force ................ Various ................................... ...................... Operation and Maintenance ...................................................................... 99,570 Various ..................................................................... Defense-wide ......... Various ................................... ...................... Operation and Maintenance ...................................................................... 476,764 

Total Operation and Maintenance ............. ................................ ................................................ ...................... .................................................................................................................... 1,785,453 

Various ..................................................................... Army ....................... Various ................................... ...................... Military Personnel Moves .......................................................................... ....................Various ..................................................................... Navy ....................... Various ................................... ...................... Military Personnel Moves .......................................................................... 1,456 Various ..................................................................... Air Force ................ Various ................................... ...................... Military Personnel Moves .......................................................................... 1,277 Various ..................................................................... Defense-wide ......... Various ................................... ...................... Military Personnel Moves .......................................................................... ....................

Total MilPers PCS ....................................... ................................ ................................................ ...................... .................................................................................................................... 2,733 

Various ..................................................................... Army ....................... Various ................................... ...................... Other .......................................................................................................... 51,678 Various ..................................................................... Navy ....................... Various ................................... ...................... Other .......................................................................................................... 3,601 Various ..................................................................... Air Force ................ Various ................................... ...................... Other .......................................................................................................... 6,853 
36 

BRAC 2005 PROJECTS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

State Service Location Commission recommendation Project Amount 

Various ..................................................................... Defense-wide ......... Various ................................... ...................... Other .......................................................................................................... 121,584 

Total Other ................................................. ................................ ................................................ ...................... .................................................................................................................... 183,716 TOTAL FISCAL YEAR 2011 FUNDING FOR 

BRAC 2005.

................................ ................................................ ...................... .................................................................................................................... 2,354,285 
37 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

SEC. 101. The Committee includes a provision that restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract for work, except in 

cases of contracts for environmental restoration at base closure 

sites. 

SEC. 102. The Committee includes a provision that permits use 

of funds for hire of passenger motor vehicles. 

SEC. 103. The Committee includes a provision that permits use 

of funds for defense access roads. 

SEC. 104. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits construction of new bases inside the continental United States for 

which specific appropriations have not been made. 

SEC. 105. The Committee includes a provision that limits the use 

of funds for purchase of land or land easements. 

SEC. 106. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits the 

use of funds to acquire land, prepare a site, or install utilities for 

any family housing except housing for which funds have been made 

available. 

SEC. 107. The Committee includes a provision that limits the use 

of minor construction funds to transfer or relocate activities among 

installations. 

SEC. 108. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits the 

procurement of steel unless American producers, fabricators, and 

manufacturers have been allowed to compete. 

SEC. 109. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits payments of real property taxes in foreign nations. 

SEC. 110. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits construction of new bases overseas without prior notification. 

SEC. 111. The Committee includes a provision that establishes a 

threshold for American preference of $500,000 relating to architect 

and engineering services for overseas projects. 

SEC. 112. The Committee includes a provision that establishes 

preference for American contractors for military construction in the 

United States territories and possessions in the Pacific, and on 

Kwajalein Atoll, or in countries bordering the Arabian Sea. 

SEC. 113. The Committee includes a provision that requires notification of military exercises involving construction in excess of 

$100,000. 

SEC. 114. The Committee includes a provision that limits obligations during the last 2 months of the fiscal year. 

SEC. 115. The Committee includes a provision that permits funds 

appropriated in prior years to be available for construction authorized during the current session of Congress. 

SEC. 116. The Committee includes a provision that permits the 

use of expired or lapsed funds to pay the cost of supervision for any 

project being completed with lapsed funds. 

SEC. 117. The Committee includes a provision that permits obligation of funds from more than 1 fiscal year to execute a construction project, provided that the total obligation for such project is 

consistent with the total amount appropriated for the project. 

SEC. 118. The Committee includes a provision that directs the 

Department to report annually on actions taken to encourage other 

nations to assume a greater share of the common defense burden. 
38 

SEC. 119. The Committee includes a provision that allows transfer of proceeds from earlier base closure accounts to the continuing 

base closure account (1990, parts I–IV). 

SEC. 120. The Committee includes a provision that permits the 

transfer of funds from Family Housing Construction accounts to 

the DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund and from Military 

Construction accounts to the DOD Military Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund. 

SEC. 121. The Committee includes a provision that requires the 

service secretaries to notify the congressional defense committees of 

all family housing privatization solicitations and agreements which 

contain any clause providing consideration for base realignment 

and closure, force reductions and extended deployments. 

SEC. 122. The Committee includes a provision that provides 

transfer authority to the Homeowners Assistance Fund. 

SEC. 123. The Committee includes a provision that requires that 

all acts making appropriations for military construction be the sole 

funding source of all operation and maintenance for family housing, 

including flag and general officer quarters, and limits the repair on 

flag and general officer quarters to $35,000 per unit per year without prior notification to the congressional defense committees. 

SEC. 124. The Committee includes a provision that provides authority to expend funds from the ‘‘Ford Island Improvement’’ account. 

SEC. 125. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits the 

expenditure of funds at installations or for projects no longer necessary as a result of BRAC 2005. 

SEC. 126. The Committee includes a provision that allows the 

transfer of expired funds to the Foreign Currency Fluctuation, Construction, Defense Account. 

SEC. 127. The Committee includes a provision that allows the reprogramming of military construction and family housing construction funds among projects and activities within the account in 

which they are funded. 
(39) 

TITLE II 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

HEARINGS

The Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs 

and Related Agencies held one hearing related to the fiscal year 

2011 Department of Veterans Affairs [VA] budget request on April 

15, 2010. The subcommittee heard testimony from the Honorable 

Eric Shinseki, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Additionally, on May 20, 2010, the subcommittee held a joint 

hearing with the Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and 

Urban Development related to homeless veteran programs administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department 

of Housing and Urban Development. 

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommendation includes $123,270,764,000 for 

the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2011, including 

$63,849,146,000 in mandatory spending and $59,421,618,000 in 

discretionary spending. 

DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW

The Veterans Administration was established on July 21, 1930, 

as an independent agency by Executive Order 5398, in accordance 

with the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 1016). This act authorized 

the President to consolidate and coordinate Federal agencies specially created for or concerned with the administration of laws providing benefits to veterans, including the Veterans’ Bureau, the Bureau of Pensions, and the National Home for Disabled Volunteer 

Soldiers. On March 15, 1989, the Veterans Administration was elevated to Cabinet-level status as the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

The VA’s mission is to serve America’s veterans and their families as their principal advocate in ensuring they receive the care, 

support, and recognition they have earned in service to the Nation. 

As of September 30, 2009, there were an estimated 23.1 million living veterans, with 23 million of them residing in the United States 

and Puerto Rico. There were an estimated 35.2 million dependents 

(spouses and dependent children) of living veterans in the United 

States and Puerto Rico, and there were over 530,000 survivors of 

deceased veterans receiving VA survivor benefits in the United 

States and Puerto Rico. Thus, more than 58.7 million people, or 

18.9 percent of the total estimated resident population of the 

United States and Puerto Rico, were recipients or potential recipi-
40 

ents of veterans benefits from the Federal Government. The VA’s 

operating units include the Veterans Benefits Administration, Veterans Health Administration, National Cemetery Administration, 

and staff support offices. 

The Veterans Benefits Administration [VBA] provides an integrated program of nonmedical veterans benefits. The VBA administers a broad range of benefits to veterans and other eligible beneficiaries through 57 regional offices and a records processing center 

in St. Louis, Missouri. The benefits provided include: compensation 

for service-connected disabilities; pensions for wartime, needy, and 

totally disabled veterans; vocational rehabilitation assistance; educational and training assistance; home buying assistance; estate 

protection services for veterans under legal disability; information 

and assistance through personalized contacts; and six life insurance programs. 

The Veterans Health Administration [VHA] develops, maintains, 

and operates a national healthcare delivery system for eligible veterans; carries out a program of education and training of 

healthcare personnel; conducts medical research and development; 

and furnishes health services to members of the Armed Forces during periods of war or national emergency. A system of 153 hospitals, 1,031 outpatient clinics, 135 nursing homes, and 90 VA residential rehabilitation treatment programs is maintained to meet 

the VA’s medical mission. 

The National Cemetery Administration [NCA] provides for the 

interment of the remains of eligible deceased servicemembers and 

discharged veterans in any national cemetery with available grave 

space; permanently maintains these graves; provides headstones 

and markers for the graves of eligible persons in national and private cemeteries; administers the grant program for aid to States in 

establishing, expanding, or improving State veterans cemeteries; 

and provides certificates to families of deceased veterans recognizing their contributions and service to the Nation. The National 

Cemetery Administration includes 164 cemeterial installations and 

activities. 

Staff support offices include the Office of Inspector General, 

Boards of Contract Appeals and Veterans Appeals, and General Administration offices, which support the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, Under Secretary for Benefits, Under Secretary for Health, 

Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs, and General Counsel. 

VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $56,734,419,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 64,013,884,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 64,013,884,000 

ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW

The Veterans Benefits Administration [VBA] is responsible for 

the payment of compensation and pension benefits to eligible service-connected disabled veterans, as well as education benefits and 

housing loan guarantees. 
41 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $64,013,884,000 for the Veterans 

Benefits Administration. This amount is composed of 

$53,492,234,000 for Compensation and pensions; $10,440,245,000 

for Readjustment benefits; $62,589,000 for Veterans insurance and 

indemnities; $19,078,000 for the Veterans housing benefit program 

fund, with $165,000,000 in credit subsidies and $163,646,000 for 

administrative expenses; $48,000 for the Vocational rehabilitation 

loans program account, with $337,000 for administrative expenses; 

and $707,000 for the Native American veteran housing loan program account. 

COMPENSATION AND PENSIONS

(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $47,396,106,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 53,492,234,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 53,492,234,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Compensation is payable to living veterans who have suffered 

impairment of earning power from service-connected disabilities. 

The amount of compensation is based upon the impact of disabilities on a veteran’s earning capacity. Death compensation or dependency and indemnity compensation is payable to the surviving 

spouses and dependents of veterans whose deaths occur while on 

active duty or result from service-connected disabilities. A clothing 

allowance may also be provided for service-connected veterans who 

use a prosthetic or orthopedic device. In fiscal year 2011, the Department estimates that the Compensation program will provide 

payments to 3,434,556 veterans, 380,525 survivors, and 1,213 dependents receiving special benefits. 

Pensions are an income security benefit payable to needy wartime veterans who are precluded from gainful employment due to 

non-service-connected disabilities which render them permanently 

and totally disabled. Public Law 107–103, the Veterans Education 

and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, restored the automatic presumption of permanent and total nonservice connected disability 

for purposes of awarding a pension to veterans age 65 and older, 

subject to the income limitations that apply to all pensioners. 

Death pensions are payable to needy surviving spouses and children of deceased wartime veterans. The rate payable for both disability and death pensions is determined on the basis of the annual 

income of the veteran or their survivors. In fiscal year 2011, the 

Department estimates that the Pensions program will provide benefits to 308,829 veterans and 194,210 survivors. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $53,492,234,000 for Compensation 

and pensions. This is an increase of $6,096,128,000 above the fiscal 

year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

The appropriation includes $30,423,000 in payments to the General operating expenses, veterans benefits administration; Medical 

support and compliance; and Information technology systems ac-
42 

counts for expenses related to implementing provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, the Veterans’ Benefits Act 

of 1992, the Veterans’ Benefits Improvements Act of 1994, and the 

Veterans’ Benefits Improvements Act of 1996. 

READJUSTMENT BENEFITS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $9,232,369,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 10,440,245,000 

Committee recommendation .................................................................10,440,245,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Readjustment benefits appropriation finances the education 

and training of veterans and servicemembers under chapters 30, 

31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42 and 43 of title 38, United 

States Code. These benefits include the All-Volunteer Force Educational Assistance Program (Montgomery GI bill) and the Post 9/ 

11 Educational Assistance Program. Basic benefits are funded 

through appropriations made to the readjustment benefits appropriation and by transfers from the Department of Defense. This account also finances vocational rehabilitation, specially adapted 

housing grants, specially adapted automobile grants for certain disabled veterans, and educational assistance allowances for eligible 

dependents of those veterans who died from service-connected 

causes or who have a total permanent service-connected disability, 

as well as dependents of servicemembers who were captured or 

missing in action. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $10,440,245,000 for Readjustment 

benefits. This is an increase of $1,207,876,000 above the fiscal year 

2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

VETERANS INSURANCE AND INDEMNITIES

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $49,288,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 62,589,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 62,589,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Veterans insurance and indemnities appropriation consists 

of the former appropriations for military and naval insurance, applicable to World War I veterans; National Service Life Insurance, 

applicable to certain World War II veterans; Servicemen’s indemnities, applicable to Korean conflict veterans; and veterans mortgage life insurance to individuals who have received a grant for 

specially adapted housing. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $62,589,000 for Veterans insurance 

and indemnities. This is an increase of $13,301,000 above the fiscal 

year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. The Department estimates there will be 7,051,185 policies in force in fiscal 

year 2011 with a value of $1,336,891,000,000. 
43 

VETERANS HOUSING BENEFIT PROGRAM FUND

Program account Administrative 

expenses 

Appropriations, 2010 ....................................................................................................... $23,553,000 $165,082,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ................................................................................................... 19,078,000 163,646,000 

Committee recommendation ........................................................................................... 19,078,000 163,646,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Veterans housing benefit program fund provides for all costs 

associated with the VA’s direct and guaranteed housing loan programs, with the exception of the Native American veteran housing 

loan program. 

VA loan guaranties are made to servicemembers, veterans, reservists, and unremarried surviving spouses for the purchase of 

homes, condominiums, and manufactured homes, and for refinancing loans. VA guarantees part of the total loan, permitting the 

purchaser to obtain a mortgage with a competitive interest rate, 

even without a downpayment, if the lender agrees. The VA requires that a downpayment be made for a manufactured home. 

With a VA guaranty, the lender is protected against loss up to the 

amount of the guaranty if the borrower fails to repay the loan. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends such sums as may be necessary for 

funding subsidy payments, estimated to total $19,078,000; and 

$163,646,000 for administrative expenses for fiscal year 2011. Bill 

language limits gross obligations for direct loans for speciallyadapted housing to $500,000. 

VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION LOANS PROGRAM ACCOUNT

Program account Administrative 

expenses 

Appropriations, 2010 ....................................................................................................... $29,000 $328,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ................................................................................................... 48,000 337,000 

Committee recommendation ........................................................................................... 48,000 337,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Vocational rehabilitation loans program account covers the 

cost of direct loans for vocational rehabilitation of eligible veterans 

and, in addition, includes administrative expenses necessary to 

carry out the direct loan program. Loans of up to $1,095 (based on 

the indexed chapter 31 subsistence allowance rate) are currently 

available to service-connected disabled veterans enrolled in vocational rehabilitation programs, as provided under 38 U.S.C. chapter 

31, when the veteran is temporarily in need of additional assistance. Repayment is made in 10 monthly installments, without interest, through deductions from future payments of compensation, 

pension, subsistence allowance, educational assistance allowance, 

or retirement pay. Virtually all loans are repaid in full and most 

in less than 1 year. 
44 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $48,000 for program costs and 

$337,000 for administrative expenses for the Vocational rehabilitation loans program account. The administrative expenses may be 

transferred to and merged with the General operating expenses, 

veterans benefits administration account. Bill language is included 

limiting program direct loans to $3,042,272. It is estimated that 

the VA will make 3,286 loans in fiscal year 2011, with an average 

amount of $926. 

NATIVE AMERICAN VETERAN HOUSING LOAN PROGRAM ACCOUNT

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $664,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 707,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 707,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program is authorized by 38 U.S.C. chapter 37, section 3761 to provide direct loans 

to Native American veterans living on trust lands. The loans are 

available to purchase, construct, or improve homes to be occupied 

as veteran residences, or to refinance a loan previously made under 

this program in order to lower the interest rate. The principal 

amount of a loan under this authority is limited to the Federal 

Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s single-family conventional conforming loan limit. Veterans pay a funding fee of 1.25 percent of 

the loan amount, although veterans with a service-connected disability are exempt from paying the fee. Before a direct loan can be 

made, the veteran’s tribal organization must sign a memorandum 

of understanding with the VA regarding the terms and conditions 

of the loan. The Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program 

began as a pilot program in 1993 and was made permanent by 

Public Law 109–233, the Veterans Housing Opportunity and Benefits Act of 2006. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $707,000 for administrative expenses associated with this program. This is $43,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $45,077,500,000 

Appropriations, 2011 ............................................................................. 48,183,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 590,000,000 

Budget estimate, advance appropriation, 2012 ................................... 50,610,985,000 

Committee recommendation, 2011 ....................................................... 710,000,000 

Committee recommendation, advance appropriation, 2012 ............... 50,610,985,000 

ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW

The Veterans Health Administration [VHA] operates the largest 

Federal medical care delivery system in the country, with 153 hospitals, 90 VA residential rehabilitation treatment programs, 135 

nursing homes, and 1,031 outpatient clinics, which include independent, satellite, community-based, and rural outreach clinics. 
45 

The Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Care Collections 

Fund [MCCF] was established by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 

(Public Law 105–33). In fiscal year 2004, Public Law 108–199 allowed the Department to deposit first-party and pharmaceutical copayments; third-party insurance payments and enhanced use collections; long-term care co-payments; Compensated Work Therapy 

Program collections; Compensation and Pension Living Expenses 

Program collections; and Parking Program fees into the MCCF. 

The Parking Program provides funds for the construction, alteration, and acquisition (by purchase or lease) of parking garages at 

VA medical facilities authorized by 38 U.S.C. 8109. The Secretary 

is required under certain circumstances to establish and collect fees 

for the use of such garages and parking facilities. Receipts from the 

parking fees are to be deposited into the MCCF and are used for 

medical services activities. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $710,000,000 for the Veterans 

Health Administration for fiscal year 2011, without collections. 

This amount is composed of $100,000,000 for Medical services; 

$20,000,000 for Medical facilities; and $590,000,000 for Medical 

and prosthetic research. Medical care collections are expected to be 

$3,393,000,000. Additionally, the Committee provided an advance 

appropriation of $48,183,000,000 for veterans medical care for fiscal year 2011 in the fiscal year 2010 bill. Therefore, VHA will have 

total resources of $52,286,000,000, plus any carryover from fiscal 

year 2010, available in fiscal year 2011. In addition, the Committee 

recommendation also includes an advance appropriation of 

$50,610,985,000 for veterans medical care for fiscal year 2012. 

AREAS OF INTEREST

VA Nursing Academy.—The Committee commends the VA for addressing the nursing shortage through the Veterans Affairs Nursing Academy. This 5-year pilot program is designed to establish 

partnerships with competitively selected nursing schools to expand 

the number of teaching faculty in VA facilities and affiliated nursing schools in order to increase student enrollment in baccalaureate 

nursing programs. The Committee also urges the VA to continue 

its collaboration with the Department of Defense through the Uniformed Services University of the Health Services by providing 

nurse faculty and nursing students in graduate nursing education 

programs. 

Advanced Nursing Education.—The Committee urges the VA, in 

conjunction with accredited schools of nursing, to explore the development of a fast track doctoral training program which would facilitate completion of a doctorate in nursing by qualified nurses employed within the VA network who possess a bachelor of science in 

nursing. 

Licensing Requirements at DOD/VA Collocated Facilities.—The 

Committee supports efforts to eliminate additional burdens placed 

on healthcare providers by requiring two different licensing processes at collocated facilities for the Department of Defense and the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. Providing the highest quality of 

healthcare for service men and women, and veterans is the Com-
46 

mittee’s number one priority. In an effort to ensure that providers 

are able to efficiently and effectively care for their patients without 

imposing additional burdens on health providers, the Committee 

directs the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans 

Affairs to examine ways in which duplicative licensing requirements may be eliminated at collocated facilities and to report these 

findings to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 

Congress no later than March 18, 2011. 

Services for Women Veterans.—The Committee is aware that the 

percentage of women veterans receiving care at the VA is expected 

to double in the next 5 years. Many of these women veterans have 

experienced combat and will present needs that VA has likely not 

seen before in this population. The Committee remains dedicated 

to ensuring that the evolving needs of women veterans are met. Accordingly, the Committee encourages the VA to continue and expand their ongoing study of women’s issues, develop and provide a 

capital plan for facility upgrades, and expand outreach to ensure 

these veterans are aware of the benefits they have earned. 

Infrastructure Improvements.—In May 2010, the Department of 

Veterans Affairs announced the Surgical Complexity Initiative to 

ensure that VA medical centers with inpatient surgical programs 

have the best available infrastructure in relation to the complexity 

of the surgical procedures being performed. While the Committee 

is pleased with this initiative to enhance patient safety, the Department must ensure that this initiative does not result in limitations on specialty of care or quality of care. The Committee is concerned that campus-style facilities in small and mid-sized cities, including the medical centers in Danville, Illinois; Des Moines, Iowa; 

Wichita, Kansas; Spokane, Washington; Sioux Falls, South Dakota; 

and Salem, Virginia, have not received necessary infrastructure improvements critical to the care of their patient populations. Not 

later than 90 days after enactment of this act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall report to the Committees on Appropriations of 

both Houses of Congress ways in which infrastructure improvements at small and mid-sized medical centers may be used to expand access for rural veterans to specialty care and improve overall 

quality of care. 

Outreach to Rural Veterans.—The Committee urges the Department to partner with State and local organizations to conduct outreach to veterans in underserved areas in order to find and support 

veterans living in rural and highly rural areas to ensure they receive the care and benefits to which they are entitled. 

Toxic Exposures.—The Committee directs the Department to take 

all necessary and appropriate steps in coordination with the Department of Defense to identify and treat veterans suffering ill effects from potential exposure to dangerous chemical agents during 

their military service. The Department must ensure that 

healthcare providers at all levels are knowledgeable of occupational 

and environmental health threats in locations in which their patients have served. The Committee encourages the Department to 

systematically update providers on specific issues developing in deployed areas and ensure that providers document confirmed and 

possible exposures in individual medical records and make use of 

registry programs for long-term medical follow-up and surveillance. 
47 

Cost Saving Initiative.—Over the past decade, the Department 

has undertaken an effort to modernize its medical facilities through 

new construction and renovation. This recapitalization effort is imperative to the delivery of high quality medical care. Often when 

a new surgical ward or other treatment facility undergoes construction, the VA has to find alternative areas for treatment or contract 

care to non-VA medical providers. The Committee believes that the 

VA could achieve cost savings during renovation or construction by 

either leasing or purchasing mobile units. The Committee encourages the Department to launch a pilot project in at least two VISNs 

that have renovation or construction projects underway, to lease or 

purchase mobile surgical units through a full and open competition 

while construction is underway. Additionally, the VA should develop metrics for a cost benefit analysis to determine whether this 

approach has achieved savings versus contracting care through 

local medical providers. 

Rural Telehealth/Electronic Health Records.—The Committee is 

aware that the Health Resources and Services Administration 

[HRSA] within the Department of Health and Human Services has 

begun an initiative to provide rural healthcare providers with telehealth equipment and electronic health record systems that will 

complement the VA’s Rural Health Initiative. The Committee urges 

the VA to collaborate with HRSA to ensure that both initiatives 

succeed in improving the health of veterans in remote and rural 

areas. 

Blind Rehabilitative Services.—The Committee cautions that private providers for blind rehabilitation may not have the full specialized nursing, physical therapy, pain management, speech pathology, pharmacy services, lab or radiology support services, along 

with ophthalmology, optometry, and other important surgery specialists to provide the clinical care necessary for the returning combat eye injured or wounded. The Committee urges that any nonVA medical providers treating veterans demonstrate peer reviewed 

quality outcome measurements that are a standard part of the Veterans Health Administration’s Blind Rehabilitative Service. In 

cases where it is necessary to refer a visually impaired or blinded 

veteran to a non-VA blind rehabilitative center, VA should ensure 

that the center be accredited by either the National Accreditation 

Council for Agencies Serving the Blind and Visually Handicapped 

or the Commission For Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities, 

and that the employed specialists be certified by the Academy for 

Certification of Vision Rehabilitation and Education Professionals. 

MEDICAL SERVICES

(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $34,707,500,000 

Appropriations, 2011 ............................................................................. 37,136,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... ........................... 

Budget estimate, advance appropriation, 2012 ................................... 39,649,985,000 

Committee recommendation, 2011 ....................................................... 100,000,000 

Committee recommendation, advance appropriation, 2012 ............... 39,649,985,000 
48 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Medical services account provides for medical services of enrolled eligible veterans and certain dependent beneficiaries in VA 

medical centers, VA outpatient clinics, contract hospitals, State 

homes, and outpatient programs on a fee basis. Hospital and outpatient care is also provided by the private sector for certain dependents and survivors of veterans under the civilian health and 

medical programs for the VA. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

In fiscal year 2010, the Committee provided an advance appropriation of $37,136,000,000 for fiscal year 2011. This year, the 

Committee recommends an additional $100,000,000 for the Medical 

services account. When combined, this amount is $2,528,500,000 

over the fiscal year 2010 enacted level. In addition, the VA has the 

authority to retain co-payments and third-party collections, estimated to total $3,393,000,000 in fiscal year 2011. 

The Committee recommendation also includes an advance appropriation of $39,649,985,000 for Medical Services for fiscal year 

2012. This is $2,413,985,000 above the level for fiscal year 2011 

and equal to the fiscal year 2012 budget request. 

The recommendation along with the advance appropriation provided in last year’s bill fully funds the Department’s estimate for 

Medical Services, which includes: $5,235,402,000 for mental 

healthcare; $2,574,756,000 to provide medical care to Operation 

Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans; 

$179,000,000 for readjustment counseling; $1,998,368,000 for prosthetics; and $799,210,000 for homeless programs. 

The Committee has also provided additional funds to implement 

new requirements carried in Public Law 111–163, the Caregivers 

and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010, which was 

signed by the President on May 5, 2010. This includes an additional $24,576,000, as well as $35,424,000 included in the base estimate, for a total of $60,000,000, for caregiver support; $36,000,000 

for provisions relating to women veteran healthcare; $3,000,000 for 

grants to Veteran Service Organizations to transport veterans in 

highly rural areas to VA medical centers; and $23,424,000 for other 

new requirements contained in Public Law 111–163. The Committee is aware that the VA is currently developing regulations to 

implement these new requirements and directs the VA to include 

the budget resources necessary for fiscal year 2012 in the fiscal 

year 2012 budget request. 

The recommendation also includes an additional $3,000,000 for 

the Homeless Grant and Per Diem Program and $10,000,000 to 

open new vet centers across the country and on Native American 

reservations. 

Homeless Veterans.—According to the VA, roughly 107,000 veterans are homeless on any given night. The average homeless veteran served in the post-Vietnam era (1975–1990), is 51, male, single, and has an income of less than $125 per week. Female veterans are the fastest growing segment of the homeless population, 

and minority veterans represent 53 percent of the total homeless 

population. Over the past year, the VA has elevated the plight of 
49 

homeless veterans by making the elimination of homelessness a 

central goal of the Department. The Committee applauds this effort 

and has provided $3,400,944,000, including $799,210,000 to support VA’s direct homeless programs, within the fiscal year 2011 appropriation. Further, the Committee has provided an additional 

$3,000,000 for the homeless grant and per diem program and 

$10,000,000 within the Minor Construction account to support the 

Department’s renovation efforts on VA campuses of underutilized 

and surplus buildings for the conversion into housing options for 

homeless veterans. 

The Committee remains concerned that the nutritional, housing, 

medical, and social work needs of homeless veterans living in rural 

areas are not adequately being addressed by current VA programs, 

especially in areas where the VA lacks services, leading to an 

underestimation of the number of homeless veterans requiring care 

and services. The Committee directs the Secretary to conduct an 

assessment of the needs of homeless veterans living in these areas 

and to submit a plan to the Committees on Appropriations of both 

Houses of Congress within 180 days after enactment of this act. 

The plan should address alternative means of service delivery, if 

appropriate, in areas where VA services are unavailable, such as 

reimbursing local providers for these services. 

Vet Centers.—The Committee recommendation includes an additional $10,000,000 for the Department to establish new vet centers 

across the country. The Committee is concerned that Native American veterans often have to travel long distances to receive the care 

in which they are entitled. Over the past several years, the Committee has encouraged greater collaboration between the VA and 

the Indian Health Service [IHS] to ensure that these veterans do 

not fall through the cracks. The Committee believes that this collaboration should continue and expand. However, the Department 

must do a better job at providing Native American veterans access 

to VA facilities. For instance, there are currently only three Vet 

Centers operating on Native American reservations. The goal of 

Vet Centers is to provide a broad range of counseling, outreach, 

and referral services to eligible veterans in order to help them 

make a satisfying post-war readjustment to civilian life. These centers play a vital role in providing services to veterans. Therefore, 

within these funds, the Committee directs the VA to work with 

American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian organizations to open additional vet centers in Native communities. 

Women Veterans Healthcare Technology.—The Committee is 

aware of the advances in medical technologies, specifically advances in digital colposcopy. This device allows medical providers 

to detect cervical cancer at an earlier stage, which can greatly improve prognosis. Some digital colposcopies on the market today are 

compatible with the VA’s electronic medical record, which can allow 

providers to compare abnormalities from visit to visit. The Committee urges the VA to move as quickly as possible to acquire this 

technology and implement it in the field and directs the Department to report back to the Committees on Appropriations of both 

Houses of Congress by January 21, 2011, on the number of devices 

acquired and the locations of their use. 
50 

Virtual Colonoscopy.—Virtual colonoscopy utilizes noninvasive 

technology to detect colorectal cancer. The high prevalence of 

colorectal cancer in the veterans population, coupled with the fact 

that fewer than one-half of those age 50 and older who should be 

screened for the disease opt to receive the traditional exams, points 

to a need for the VA to more actively utilize this noninvasive procedure. The Committee urges the VA to acquire virtual colonoscopy 

technology and deploy it as quickly as possible. 

Guide and Service Dog Program.—The Committee directs the Department of Veterans Affairs to fully and rapidly implement section 

1714 of title 38, United States Code, regarding the provision of 

guide dogs and service dogs to qualified veterans seeking such 

services. Additionally, the Committee directs the Department to 

continue assisting those veterans with mental illnesses, including 

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, who would benefit from having a 

service dog. The Committee urges the Department to consult with 

nonprofit organizations with expertise in the training and provision 

of service dogs and education in the use of service dogs in order to 

review current policies and regulations. The Department is directed 

to report back to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses 

of Congress by February 25, 2011, on the status of implementing 

section 1714 of title 38. 

Northern Rockies and the Dakotas Polytrauma Network Site.— The Committee is aware that there is no Department of Veterans 

Affairs Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center or Polytrauma Network 

Site for the care of wounded veterans with traumatic brain injuries 

in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho, or Wyoming. This 

area encompasses approximately 740,000 square miles. The vastness of this area imposes significant hardships on veterans who require care within the Department of Veterans Affairs Polytrauma 

System of Care and who wish to live close to home and their families while receiving care. Therefore, the Committee directs the Department of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress a report on the 

feasibility and advisability of establishing a Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center or Polytrauma Network Site in the Northern Rockies 

or the Dakotas. 

Tissue Sample Tracking.—The Committee is aware the VA may 

not be using the most current and efficient methods for handling 

tissue samples for testing. As more veterans with complex needs 

are entering the VA system, it is critical the tissue samples are 

handled using best practices to minimize errors within the system. 

The Committee urges the VA to review its tissue handling process 

and encourages the Department to examine commercial methods in 

order to ensure it is using the most efficient and exact system. 

Age-related Hearing Loss.—The Committee recognizes the incidence and severity of hearing loss due to faulty sensory nerves, 

known as sensorineural hearing loss, and that the associated costs 

are increasing at dramatic rates. Currently, there are no approved 

therapeutics that either prevent or treat sensorineural hearing 

loss, a leading and costly cause of disability within the VA system. 

The Committee encourages the VA to examine and support the development and clinical testing of therapeutics aimed at preventing 

and treating sensorineural, age-related, noise-induced, and drug-induced hearing loss. 
51 

Weber Valley, Utah.—The Committee is aware of the lack of access to readjustment counseling, including vet center services, for 

veterans living in and around Weber County, Utah, and directs the 

Department to report back to the Committees on Appropriations of 

both Houses of Congress by October 30, 2010, on how it will meet 

the readjustment counseling needs of Weber County-area veterans. 

The study should include the following: veterans current and future needs for readjustment counseling in and around Weber County; the feasibility of establishing a vet center in Ogden, Utah; and 

the frequency that the Salt Lake City vet center, or any other VA 

asset, provides on-site counselors to veterans in and around Weber 

County. 

Infection Control and Injection Safety Practices.—The Committee 

is deeply concerned with the rise in the number of disease outbreaks in the U.S. healthcare system related to the reuse of medical equipment, including syringes, scopes, and multi-dose vials. In 

the January 2009 edition of the Annals of Internal Medicine, an article published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

[CDC] revealed the occurrence of 33 outbreaks of viral hepatitis in 

healthcare settings over the last decade, and during the last 3 

years, reports have revealed widespread problems in both the DOD 

and VA healthcare systems in which thousands of veterans and 

servicemembers were potentially exposed to hepatitis B, hepatitis 

C, HIV, and blood borne diseases. The most recent occurrence was 

in March of this year at the St. Louis VA Medical Center, where 

an internal inspection led to the discovery that dental equipment 

had not been cleaned using standard operating procedures or manufacturer’s guidelines. The Committee encourages the Department 

of Veterans Affairs to work with the CDC to educate and raise 

awareness for infection control and injection safety practices across 

the VA healthcare network. 

National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.—The Committee remains supportive of efforts being developed by the National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in advancing the 

agenda for research and education on post traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]. At a time when independent and Government experts in the area of PTSD are warning of the likelihood that large 

numbers of returning combat troops from Iraq and Afghanistan are 

suffering from mental disorders and PTSD, the Department should 

ensure that sufficient funding is provided for the Center. The Committee directs that the Department submit to the Committees on 

Appropriations of both Houses of Congress by October 1, 2010, a 

detailed plan outlining the resources being provided to the Center 

and any expected increases in fiscal year 2011. Further, the Committee directs that the Center’s budget be listed as a selected program highlight in future budget requests. 

MEDICAL SUPPORT AND COMPLIANCE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $4,930,000,000 

Appropriations, 2011 ............................................................................. 5,307,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... ........................... 

Budget estimate, advance appropriation, 2012 ................................... 5,535,000,000 

Committee recommendation, 2011 ....................................................... ........................... 

Committee recommendation, advance appropriation, 2012 ............... 5,535,000,000 
52 

The Medical support and compliance account provides funds for 

management, security, and administrative expenses within the VA 

healthcare system, in addition to providing costs associated with 

the operation of VA medical centers and clinics, VISN offices, and 

the VHA Central Office in Washington, DC. This appropriation also 

covers Chief of Staff and Facility Director operations, quality of 

care oversight, legal services, billing and coding activities, procurement, financial management, security, and human resource management. 

The President’s 2011 submission for Medical Support and Compliance is based on an actuarial analysis founded on the current 

and projected veteran population, enrollment projections of demand, and case mix changes associated with current veteran patients. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

In fiscal year 2010, the Committee provided an advance appropriation of $5,307,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 for the Medical support and compliance account. This is $377,000,000 above the fiscal 

year 2010 enacted level. Additionally, the Committee recommendation includes an advance appropriation of $5,535,000,000 for Medical support and compliance for fiscal year 2012, which is 

$228,000,000 above the level for fiscal year 2011 and equal to the 

budget request for fiscal year 2012. 

MEDICAL FACILITIES

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $4,859,000,000 

Appropriations, 2011 ............................................................................. 5,740,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... ........................... 

Budget estimate, advance appropriation, 2012 ................................... 5,426,000,000 

Committee recommendation, 2011 ....................................................... 20,000,000 

Committee recommendation, advance appropriation, 2012 ............... 5,426,000,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Medical facilities account provides funds for the operation 

and maintenance of the VA healthcare system’s vast capital infrastructure. This appropriation provides for costs associated with 

utilities, engineering, capital planning, leases, laundry, 

groundskeeping, housekeeping, facility repair, and property disposition and acquisition. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

In fiscal year 2010, the Committee provided an advance appropriation of $5,740,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 for the Medical facilities account. The Committee recommends an additional 

$20,000,000 for the medical facilities account. When combined, this 

amount is $901,000,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level. 

Additionally, the Committee recommendation includes an advance 

appropriation of $5,426,000,000 for Medical facilities for fiscal year 

2012. This is $334,000,000 below the level for fiscal year 2011 and 

equal to the fiscal year 2012 budget request. 

Rural Clinic Initiative.—Last year, the Committee provided the 

Department $30,000,000 for the VA to open new Community Based 

Outpatient Clinics [CBOC] in rural areas. CBOCs are an integral 
53 

part of the VA’s healthcare delivery system. Often these clinics 

serve as the only link to direct VA medical care for veterans who 

reside in areas where there are no VA hospitals. While the Department has done a better job over the past several years in opening 

new CBOCs, the Committee was disappointed that the budget request did not include additional funds to establish new clinics in 

rural and highly rural areas. Therefore, the Committee has provided an additional $10,000,000 for the establishment of CBOCs in 

rural and highly rural markets. The Committee directs the Department to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both 

Houses of Congress a detailed expenditure plan for this funding no 

later than March 1, 2011. The plan should also include a list of all 

current clinics, regardless of size or contractual arrangements, 

which provide healthcare services in an outpatient setting. The 

Committee understands that the Department funds new outpatient 

clinics through the Medical Services account as well as the Medical 

Facilities account and reminds the Department that it may reprogram funds between these accounts for this initiative. 

Port Angeles Community Based Outpatient Clinic.—The Committee is aware there is a need for more medical practitioners to 

provide services at the Port Angeles CBOC. We are concerned 

about sufficient access to primary care, mental health, and specialty care for the veterans living in Clallam and Jefferson Counties. While we are pleased at the VA’s effort to improve the availability of care for those living on the Olympic Peninsula, we urge 

the VA to ensure it is adequately staffed in order to meet the critical needs of these deserving veterans. 

MEDICAL AND PROSTHETIC RESEARCH

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $581,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 590,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 590,000,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Medical and prosthetic research account provides funds for 

medical, rehabilitative, and health services research. Medical research supports basic and clinical studies that advance knowledge 

leading to improvements in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and disabilities. Rehabilitation research focuses 

on rehabilitation engineering problems in the fields of prosthetics, 

orthotics, adaptive equipment for vehicles, sensory aids and related 

areas. Health services research focuses on improving the effectiveness and economy of the delivery of health services. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $590,000,000 for Medical and prosthetic research. This is $9,000,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

The Committee remains highly supportive of this program, and 

recognizes its importance both in improving healthcare services to 

veterans and recruiting and retaining high-quality medical professionals in the Veterans Health Administration. Through the Department’s research and development program, the VA has implemented a comprehensive research agenda to develop new treat-
54 

ments and tools for clinicians to ease the physical and psychological 

pain of men and women returning from war zones, to improve access to VA healthcare services, and to accelerate discoveries and 

applications, especially for neurotrauma, sensory loss, amputation, 

polytrauma, and related prosthetic needs. 

Nursing Research Program.—The Committee supports the Veterans Affairs Nursing Research Program, which facilitates research 

on the specific nursing needs of combat veterans and aging veterans. The Committee strongly supports continuation of this program. The Committee also encourages collaboration between VA 

nurses and recipients of Tri Service Nursing Research Program 

awards in the exploration of research proposals that improve the 

health and well-being of their shared beneficiary population. 

Longitudinal Study.—On September 14, 2009, the Secretary announced that the VA would fulfill its mandate carried in section 

212 of Public Law 106–419, the Veterans Benefits and Health Care 

Improvement Act of 2000, by soliciting bids for the National Vietnam Veterans Longitudinal Study. This follow-up study will provide long awaited data on long-term effects of combat-related post 

traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] among Vietnam veterans, regardless of whether these veterans were utilizing the VA system, and 

the effectiveness of VA medical care in treating PTSD. The Committee is pleased to learn that the VA is undertaking this independent follow-up study; however, it is concerned about the length 

of time it is taking the Department to move forward. Sufficient resources have been provided within Medical and prosthetic research 

to enter into a contract with an appropriate entity to carry out a 

study on post-traumatic stress disorder as mandated in Public Law 

106–419. The Committee directs the Department to report back to 

the Committees on Appropriations no later than October 1, 2010, 

on the progress made in executing this legal requirement. 

Gulf War Illness.—The Committee directs the Department of 

Veterans Affairs to report to the Committees on Appropriations of 

both Houses of Congress not later than 90 days after enactment of 

this act on specific research efforts related to gulf war illness and 

the ways in which the Department’s research efforts are coordinated with similar programs at the Department of Defense, the Institute of Medicine and other Federal agencies. 

MEDICAL CARE COST RECOVERY COLLECTIONS

MEDICAL CARE COLLECTION FUND

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $2,954,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 2,405,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 3,393,000,000 

MEDICAL CARE COLLECTION FUND—REVENUES APPLIED

Appropriations, 2010 .............................................................................¥$2,954,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... ¥2,405,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. ¥3,393,000,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Medical Care Collection Fund [MCCF] was established by 

the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–33). In fiscal 

year 2004, Public Law 108–199 allowed the Department of Vet-
55 

erans Affairs to deposit first party and pharmacy co-payments; 

third party insurance payments and enhanced use collections; longterm care co-payments; Compensated Work Therapy Program collections; and Parking Program fees into the MCCF. The Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs has the authority to transfer funds from the 

MCCF to the Medical services account. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommendation includes the authority to retain 

co-payments and third-party collections, estimated to total 

$3,393,000,000 in fiscal year 2011. 

NATIONAL CEMETERY ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $250,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 250,504,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 250,504,000 

ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW

The National Cemetery Administration [NCA] was established in 

accordance with Public Law 93–94, the National Cemeteries Act of 

1973. It has a four-fold mission: to provide for the interment in any 

national cemetery of the remains of eligible deceased 

servicemembers and discharged veterans, together with their 

spouses and certain dependents, and to permanently maintain 

their graves; to provide headstones for, and to mark graves of, eligible persons in national, State, and private cemeteries; to administer the grant program for aid to States in establishing, expanding, or improving State veterans cemeteries; and to administer the 

Presidential Memorial Certificate Program. 

In 2010, cemeterial activities will encompass a total of 164 

cemeterial installations in 39 States, the District of Columbia, and 

Puerto Rico. The Committee’s recommendation for NCA provides 

funds for all of these cemeterial installations. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $250,504,000 for the National Cemetery Administration. This is an increase of $504,000 from the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

The Committee has included bill language to make available 

through September 30, 2012, up to $25,500,000 of the National 

Cemetery Administration appropriation. 

DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $7,545,707,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 7,754,492,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 7,661,807,000 

ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW

Departmental Administration provides for the administration of 

veterans benefits through the Veterans Benefits Administration 

[VBA], the executive direction of the Department, several top level 

supporting offices, the Board of Contract Appeals, and the Board 

of Veterans’ Appeals. 
56 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $7,661,807,000 for Departmental administration. The amount is composed of $2,148,776,000 for General operating expenses, veterans benefits administration; 

$439,613,000 for General administration; $3,147,000,000 for information technology systems; $111,867,000 for the Office of the Inspector General; $1,197,586,000 for Construction, major projects; 

$485,965,000 for Construction, minor projects; $85,000,000 for 

Grants for construction of State extended care facilities; and 

$46,000,000 for Grants for the construction of State veterans cemeteries. 

GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $2,086,707,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 2,588,389,000 

Committee recommendation 1 ............................................................... ........................... 

1Funding for General Operating Expenses is provided for in the General Operating Expenses, 

Veterans Benefits Administration; and General Administration accounts. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The administration’s budget request proposes that funding for 

the administrative expenses associated with the Veterans Benefits 

Administration and all Department-wide offices be included within 

one single appropriation account. The Committee recommendation 

includes funding for these functions in two separate accounts: General operating expenses, Veterans Benefits Administration; and 

General administration, as opposed to one account as proposed in 

the budget request. The Committee believes that differences in the 

mission and purpose of the Department’s executive offices and the 

Veterans Benefits Administration justify providing funding in two 

separate accounts. Further, separating these two broad categories 

will provide the Congress with greater visibility of budgetary resources and oversight of expenditures for these two vital missions. 

GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES, VETERANS BENEFITS

ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010 1 ........................................................................... ($1,689,207,000) 

Budget estimate, 2011 2 ......................................................................... (2,148,776,000) 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,148,776,000

1 $1,689,207,000 was provided for the Veterans Benefits Administration’s administrative expenses under the General Operating Expenses account in fiscal year 2010. 2The budget request includes $2,148,776,000 for the Veterans Benefits Administration’s administrative expenses within the General Operating Expenses account. 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The General Operating Expenses, Veterans Benefits Administration account provides funding for the Veterans Benefits Administration to administer entitlement programs such as service-connected disability compensation, education benefits, and vocational 

rehabilitation services. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $2,148,776,000 for General Operating Expenses, Veterans Benefits Administration. The Committee 
57 

has proposed creating this new account to provide increased visibility and oversight of expenditures associated with VBA. This 

amount is $459,569,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level 

and equal to the budget request. The recommendation fully funds 

the budget request for VBA to address increasing disability claims 

and the workload associated with Agent Orange presumption 

claims. The Department estimates that the increase above the fiscal year 2010 level will provide 4,048 permanent jobs for claims 

processors. The Committee has included bill language to make 

available through September 30, 2012, up to $108,008,000 for General operating expenses, veterans benefits administration. 

Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment.—The budget request included $12,000,000 for supplies associated with the ‘‘printer on 

every desk’’ initiative. However, subsequent to the submission of 

the budget request, the Department determined that implementation costs of this nationwide initiative significantly outweighed the 

benefits and has informed the Committee that no funding will be 

expended on this initiative in fiscal year 2011. The Committee directs the Department to utilize the $12,000,000 associated within 

this account for the ‘‘printer on every desk’’ initiative to hire an additional 100 Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment [VR&E] 

counselors and coordinators. The VR&E program has experienced 

a substantial increase in workload over the last several years, 

growing from 87,485 in 2007 to an estimated 110,983 in 2010. The 

Department anticipates more than 122,000 veterans and 

servicemembers will receive services from the VR&E program in 

2011. However, staffing within the program, namely counselors and 

employment coordinators, has increased only moderately over that 

same period, from 1,020 in 2007 to 1,155 in 2010. The Committee 

believes the VR&E program is a critical component in the Department’s efforts to help veterans who have service-connected disabilities obtain employment or live independently in their homes and 

in their communities if employment is not currently feasible for 

them. 

Staff and skill shortages in the VR&E workforce, as well as organizational weaknesses in the program as a whole, were documented 

by the Government Accountability Office in January 2009. Therefore, the Committee directs the Department to submit to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress a strategic 

workforce plan for the VR&E program, which should include the 

following: (1) using relevant data to determine what the workforce’s 

target caseload should be over the next 5 years; (2) using relevant 

data to identify current and future human capital needs, such as 

the appropriate number of employees to handle the estimated 

workload, how they are to be deployed across the organization, and 

what percentage of cases are likely to require extended evaluations 

and thus more manpower; and (3) identifying the critical skills and 

competencies staff will need to achieve the organization’s mission 

and goals. The Committee directs the Department to submit this 

strategic workforce plan before obligating these additional funds. 

Claims Processing.—The Committee remains committed to ensuring that the VA has the resources necessary to provide timely 

processing of disability claims. From 2000 to 2009, the VA has seen 

annual new claim filings increase by 75 percent, from 578,773 in 
58 

2000 to 1,013,712 in 2009. In fiscal year 2011, the VA is expecting 

to receive 1,318,753 new compensation and pension claims, a 30 

percent increase from 2009. Currently, the average time a veteran 

must wait to have a claim processed is 161 days. However, the recent decision by the Department to provide compensation benefits 

to veterans and survivors for three diseases presumed to be connected to service in Vietnam and exposure to Agent Orange, will 

push the average waiting time to 190 days. Claims adjudicators 

spend far too much time managing paper rather than rating 

claims. While the Committee’s recommendation includes the requested funding for new claims processors, the VA must do a better 

job of harnessing new technology to expedite this process. This includes converting paper records to digital format, utilizing commercial off the shelf technology, and developing new Information Technology solutions to accommodate digital formats. To assist the Department in accomplishing these goals, the Committee has provided funding within the Information Technology Systems [IT] account for the VBA’s Innovation Initiative, as well as the requested 

funding for the Paperless Delivery of Veterans Benefits Initiative. 

Outreach Efforts in Rural Areas.—It is imperative that the Department provide widespread outreach efforts to inform veterans of 

their benefits, particularly education benefits to which they may be 

entitled. The Committee remains concerned that in rural and highly rural areas and on Native American reservations outreach efforts are lacking. The Committee directs the Department to submit 

a report to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 

Congress by March 4, 2011, detailing outreach efforts underway to 

promote the Post 9/11 Educational Assistance Program on Native 

American reservations and highly rural areas, such as Alaska and 

Hawaii. Where appropriate the report should include what cultural 

sensitivity training the VA is providing to its personnel as part of 

these efforts. 

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

Appropriations, 2010 1 ........................................................................... ($397,500,000) 

Budget estimate, 2011 2 ......................................................................... (439,613,000) 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 439,613,000

1 $397,500,000 was provided for general administration under the General Operating Expenses account in fiscal year 2010. 2The budget request includes $439,613,000 for general administration within the General Operating Expenses account. 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The General administration account provides funding for the Office of the Secretary, six Assistant Secretaries and three independent staff offices. The budget request proposes funding these 

operations within the General operating expenses account, which 

includes funding for the administrative functions of the Veterans 

Benefits Administration. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $439,613,000 for General administration. This amount is $42,113,000 above the fiscal year 2010 en-
59 

acted level and equal to the budget request. To provide the Secretary with the flexibility to address any emerging needs, the recommendation includes bill language providing transfer authority 

between line offices, as well as to General operating expenses, Veterans Benefits Administration. The Committee has included bill 

language to make available through September 30, 2012, up to 

$22,000,000 for General administration. The funding recommendation for each line office is provided in the table below. 

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Department Fiscal year 2011 

budget request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Office of the Secretary ............................................................................................................ 10,808 10,808 

Office of Veterans Appeals ..................................................................................................... 75,198 75,198 

Office of the General Counsel ................................................................................................ 91,049 91,049 

Office of Management ............................................................................................................ 48,557 48,557 

Office of Human Resources .................................................................................................... 76,177 76,177 

Office of Policy and Planning ................................................................................................. 28,783 28,783 

Office of Operations Security and Preparedness ................................................................... 22,091 22,091 

Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs ..................................................................... 23,705 23,705 

Office of Congressional Affairs and Legislative Affairs ........................................................ 7,247 7,247 

Office of Acquisition, Logistics and Construction .................................................................. 55,998 55,998 

Total ........................................................................................................................... 439,613 439,613 

Reducing Improper Payments.—Beginning in 1982, the Federal 

Managers’ Financial Integrity Act has required Government agency 

heads to establish controls that safeguard Government assets 

against fraud, waste, and abuse when the Federal Government 

makes payments to individuals and businesses as program beneficiaries, grantees, or contractors. The Veterans Health Administration’s [VHA] Fee Care Program pays non-VA medical providers to 

treat eligible veterans when medical services are not available at 

VA facilities or in emergencies when delays are hazardous to life 

or health, including the delivery of inpatient, outpatient, prescription, and long-term care services. The Fee Care Program has experienced rapid growth in the past 8 years, from $890,000,000 in 

2002 to $3,800,000,000 in 2009. 

VHA’s Chief Business Office oversees the Fee Care Program and 

provides policy, training, and program support to fee offices, which 

processed about 5 million claims in 2009. Four Veterans Integrated 

Service Networks [VISNs] have established consolidated fee offices 

that process all claims within their respective regions; however, in 

the remaining 13 VISNs, local medical centers are responsible for 

processing their own fee claims from non-VA medical providers, including the organization, staffing, and management controls for 

their respective fee offices. Due to the highly decentralized nature 

of fee offices, the VA Office of Inspector General estimated that 

VHA improperly made $225,000,000 in overpayments for outpatient fee claims in 2008 and concluded that VHA lacks internal 

controls to assess the risk of fraud, waste, and abuse in its Fee 

Care Program. While it is worth noting that 87 percent of VA fee 

claims are pre-authorized by local medical centers, likely reducing 

the risk of intentional fraud, the prevalence of pre-authorized 
60 

claims within VA’s fee claim workload does not necessarily reduce 

the risk of waste and abuse, such as overpayments. The Department’s 2011 budget request includes $1,600,000 for 

the Office of Management to increase its audit capacity of fee care 

offices. With these funds, the Department anticipates conducting 

comprehensive audits of approximately 7 sites, or 10 to 12 fee offices. The Committee strongly supports these efforts and directs the 

Department to provide up to an additional $1,850,000 from any anticipated carryover from fiscal year 2010 to fiscal year 2011 to increase the number of audits. These additional funds will allow the 

Department to conduct 14 comprehensive audits covering 20 to 25 

fee offices. Furthermore, because these audit reviews are an inherently governmental function, the Committee directs the Department to develop the organic expertise and technological capabilities 

within the VA. 

Federally Funded Research and Development Center Study.— Within the available funds provided to General administration, including available carryover from fiscal year 2010, the Committee 

directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to award a grant or contract to the National Academy of Public Administration, an independent, nonpartisan organization that was chartered by Congress 

to assist Federal, State, and local governments in improving their 

effectiveness, efficiency, and accountability, to conduct a study on 

improvements to management structures of the Fee Care Program. 

The study should examine the following: the feasibility and advisability of consolidating fee offices within VHA’s Fee Care Program; 

what cost-savings, if any, would be realized if such consolidation 

occurred; and whether such consolidation would allow for sufficient 

management controls to reduce improper payments within the Fee 

Care Program. The review should also include a best practices comparison of such activities conducted by other healthcare payment 

organizations, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Department of Defense TRICARE Management Activity, 

and the VA’s Consolidated Patient Account Centers for third-party 

billing. 

Report Requirement.—On March 20, 2010, the President issued 

a memorandum directing agency heads to expand Payment Recapture Audits to the extent permitted by law and where cost effective. 

A Payment Recapture Audit, as defined in the memorandum, is a 

type of recovery audit whereby accountants identify improper payments made to contractors or other entities to uncover such problems as duplicate payments, payments for services not rendered, 

overpayments, and fictitious vendors. The memorandum references 

one approach that has worked effectively to identify and reduce improper payments in Government programs: having highly skilled 

accounting specialists and fraud examiners use new technology to 

recover improper payments, with their compensation tied to the 

identification of misspent funds. The Committee directs the Department to report to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses 

of Congress by October 30, 2010, on what steps have been taken 

to adopt Payment Recapture Audits as a means of reducing and recovering improper payments. 

Franchise Fund.—The Franchise Fund was established in 1997 

as a pilot program and made permanent in fiscal year 2006 under 
61 

Public Law 109–114. The Committee directs the Department to 

provide a report on the Franchise Fund’s business plan for fiscal 

year 2011. This plan should include a list of services, customers, 

overhead expenses, funds collected for services, and the unobligated 

balance from the previous fiscal year. The VA shall submit this report to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress no later than 60 days following enactment of this act. 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $3,307,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 3,307,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 3,147,000,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Information Technology [IT] appropriation, along with reimbursements, funds the costs of all IT staff salaries and expenses, 

the operations and maintenance of all existing information technology systems, and the development of new projects and programs 

designed to improve the delivery of service to veterans. This appropriation also funds the costs associated with the Office of Information and Technology, which oversees the functions highlighted 

above. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $3,147,000,000 for the Information 

Technology Systems account. This amount is $160,000,000 below 

the fiscal year 2010 level and the budget request. The Committee recommendation includes $966,000,000 for staff 

salaries and expenses, $1,453,685,000 for the operation and maintenance of existing programs, and $727,315,000 for new program 

development, all according to the Department’s fiscal year 2011 

budget submission. 

On June 19, 2009, the Secretary announced the Program Management Accountability System [PMAS], a new Department-wide 

management approach to IT projects which centers on incremental 

development with frequent milestones. PMAS is intended to eliminate long-term program failures by focusing customers, vendors, 

and programmers on near-term, small deliveries. While the Committee remains very supportive of these new internal governance 

and accountability steps, implementation has caused the VA to 

slow projects that are not meeting milestones. This has led to large 

unobligated balances within the IT account associated with program development, changing the resources needed in fiscal year 

2011 for this activity. As a result, the Committee has reduced the 

development request by $160,000,000 rather than provide funding 

which is not needed. 

To continue to increase oversight into IT system development, 

the Committee has included bill language that restricts the obligation of IT development funds until the Secretary or the Chief Information Officer submits a certification letter to the Committees on 

Appropriations of both Houses of Congress identifying which 

project/program is to receive funding in fiscal year 2011 and for 

how much. To maximize the Secretary’s flexibility, the certification 

letters may be submitted incrementally, and upon submission, 
62 

these letters will serve as the reprogramming threshold for development programs. 

Further, the Office of Information Technology is directed to provide an IT expenditure report to the Committees on Appropriations 

on a monthly basis. This report shall include a comparison to the 

project costs included in the certifications letter submitted to the 

Congress, and provide an explanation for any differences in excess 

of $1,000,000. 

Innovation Initiative.—On June 7, 2010, the Secretary announced the opening of the Industry Innovation Initiative Competition, the most recent effort under the VA Innovation Initiative 

[VAi 2]. VAi 2 is a Department-wide program aimed at bringing the 

most promising innovations to VA’s most important challenges by 

involving employees and the private sector in the creation of visionary solutions in service to veterans. This recent competition targets 

advancement in innovative housing technology to address veteran 

homelessness; telehealth; new models of dialysis and renal disease 

prevention; improvement of polytrauma care; reduction of adverse 

drug events; and an integrated veterans business accelerator designed to assist in the launch, maintenance and long-term success 

of veteran-owned businesses. The Committee is very supportive of 

these efforts being made to incorporate new solutions and commercial off the shelf technology to solve these problems. In fiscal year 

2011, the Department has requested $40,000,000 within the Information Technology Systems account for VBA Innovation Initiatives. 

The Committee directs the Department to utilize a portion of these 

funds for an open competition to utilize commercial off the shelf 

technology to develop a decision support system and automate the 

VBA’s Veterans Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee 

further directs that upon award of a contract and development of 

this automated tool that it be piloted in at least one regional office 

and that metrics for evaluating its success be implemented. 

DOD/VA Information Technology Interoperability.—The Committee supports the efforts of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

and Department of Defense to integrate programs and medical 

record systems at the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health 

Care Center, the first totally integrated Federal healthcare facility 

in the country. The Committee recognizes the significant challenges 

facing the Departments in their efforts to fully integrate all information management/information technology systems, especially 

with orders portability, and urges the Departments to take all necessary and appropriate steps to rapidly develop and deploy capacity 

to integrate information management/information technology systems. 

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $109,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 109,367,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 111,867,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Office of Inspector General [OIG] was established by the Inspector General Act of 1978 and is responsible for the audit, inves-
63 

tigation, and inspection of all Department of Veterans Affairs programs and operations. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $111,867,000 for the Office of Inspector General. This is $2,867,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and $2,500,000 above the budget request. The Committee has included bill language to make available through September 30, 2012, up to $6,000,000 for the Office of the Inspector 

General. 

CONSTRUCTION, MAJOR PROJECTS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $1,194,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 1,151,036,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,197,586,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Construction, major projects account provides for constructing, altering, extending, and improving any of the facilities 

(including parking projects) under the jurisdiction or for the use of 

the VA, including planning, architectural and engineering services, 

Capital Asset Realignment Enhanced Services [CARES] activities, 

assessment, and site acquisition where the estimated cost of a 

project is more than the amount set forth in 38 U.S.C. 

8104(a)(3)(A). Proceeds realized from Enhanced Use Lease activities may be deposited into the Construction, major projects and 

Construction, minor projects accounts. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,197,586,000 

for the construction of major projects. This is $3,586,000 above the 

fiscal year 2010 enacted level and $46,550,000 above the budget request. 

The following table reflects the President’s budget request for 

major construction projects and activities, and the corresponding 

Committee recommendations. 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location and description Fiscal year 2011 

request 

Committee recommendation 

Veterans Health Administration [VHA]: 

New Orleans, LA—New Medical Facility ............................................................... 310,000 310,000 

Denver, CO—New Medical Facility ........................................................................ 450,700 450,700 

Palo Alto, CA—Polytrauma/Ambulatory Care Replacement .................................. 30,000 30,000 

Alameda Point, CA—Outpatient Clinic and Columbarium (Design) .................... 17,332 17,332 

Omaha, NE—Hospital Replacement Facility (Design) .......................................... 56,000 56,000 

Beckley, WV—Nursing Home Care Unit ................................................................ ............................ 46,550 

Advanced Planning Fund—Various Locations ...................................................... 89,750 89,750 

Facility Security Projects—Various Locations ....................................................... 41,390 41,390 

Judgment Fund—Various Locations ...................................................................... 6,000 6,000 

BRAC Land Acquisition—Various Locations ......................................................... 13,000 13,000 

Resident Engineers for Major Construction—Various Locations .......................... 23,964 23,964 

Total VHA ........................................................................................................... 1,038,136 1,084,686 
64 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location and description Fiscal year 2011 

request 

Committee recommendation 

National Cemetery Administration [NCA]: 

Indiantown Gap, PA—Gravesite Expansion and Cemetery Improvements— 

Phase 4 ............................................................................................................. 23,500 23,500 

Los Angeles, CA—Columbarium Expansion .......................................................... 27,600 27,600 

Tahoma, WA—Gravesite Expansion and Cemetery Improvements—Phase 2 ...... 25,800 25,800 

Advanced Planning Fund—Various Locations ...................................................... 20,000 20,000 

NCA Land Acquisition Fund—Various Locations .................................................. 10,000 10,000 

Total NCA ........................................................................................................... 106,900 106,900 

General Administration—Staff Offices Department Advance Planning Fund ............... 6,000 6,000 

Total construction, major projects .................................................................... 1,151,036 1,197,586 

Strategic Capital Investment Planning.—The Committee is aware 

that the Department has recently undertaken a review and new 

strategic approach to address the problem of aging infrastructure 

in poor condition, underutilized properties, and/or a lack of sufficient infrastructure. The goal of this new planning approach is to 

provide senior decisionmakers with a 10- to 20-year view of all capital needs based on clearly stated standards, an assessment of current facilities, and an analysis of gaps between the standards and 

the current condition and location of VA facilities. According to the 

Department, this process will drive future major construction, 

minor construction and recurring and non-recurring budget requests. This review is anticipated to be completed in fiscal year 

2011, in order to inform the 2012 budget request. The Committee 

believes that such a review should lead to a comprehensive capital 

plan with current and future cost estimates of all capital needs, by 

fiscal year, similar to the Department of Defense’s Future Years 

Defense Plan, which helps define allocation of funding for military 

construction projects. Therefore, the Committee directs the Department to submit with the fiscal year 2012 budget request all findings associated with this review. 

Energy Efficiency.—The Committee recognizes VA’s initiative and 

accomplishments to date in greening the agency, and wishes to ensure that VA continues these efforts at a level that will allow both 

short- and long-term sustainability goals to be achieved. The recommendation includes $272,396,000 in resources for the Green 

Management Program in fiscal year 2011. The Committee’s desire 

is to provide green management program funding—covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, environmental management, greenhouse gas pollution reduction, sustainable building, and vehicle 

fleet management efforts—sufficient to provide VA the means for 

continuing achievements in these areas. Therefore the Committee 

directs the VA to submit to the Committees on Appropriations of 

both Houses of Congress, within 60 days of enactment of this act, 

a ‘‘Greening VA’’ operating plan that addresses all program components. The plan should include resource levels for all agency components and administrations for fiscal year 2011. 

Assessment of Real Estate Inventory.—The Committee endorses 

the administration’s recently announced effort to dispose of 

unneeded Federal real estate. The Committee wants to ensure that 
65 

VA has a comprehensive plan and effort to manage its portfolio of 

real estate at an optimal level in support of serving veterans. VA 

should use all available tools, including public-private ventures, to 

reduce the amount of unneeded assets. The Committee wants to 

ensure that all VA mission requirements, including efforts to provide supportive services and housing options for homeless veterans, 

are fully addressed in VA’s plan to reduce unneeded assets. The 

Committee directs the Department to provide a report within 60 

days of enactment of this act to the Committees on Appropriations 

of both Houses of Congress, detailing all surplus and underutilized 

buildings within the VA real estate portfolio. The report should include any recommendation for future use consistent with the VA’s 

mission, and if appropriate, any plans for disposal of the facility. 

Joint Facilities.—The Department of Defense [DOD] and Department of Veterans Affairs are currently undertaking a joint venture 

in North Chicago, where VA and DOD are consolidating their medical missions into one integrated hospital. The Committee has been 

supportive of this effort and has provided bill language to allow the 

VA to transfer money into a joint account with DOD. Both Departments believe significant cost savings can be achieved through this 

effort. The Committee believes that the VA should develop a strategic capital plan that addresses future joint ventures with DOD, 

as well with other Federal healthcare providers and academic affiliates. The Committee directs the Department to submit a joint venture strategic capital plan to the Committees on Appropriations of 

both Houses of Congress by March 25, 2011, outlining what future 

collaborative efforts with the DOD, other Federal providers and 

academic affiliates are planned. This plan should include capital 

cost estimates, the degree to which integration will occur, and potential cost savings. 

CONSTRUCTION, MINOR PROJECTS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $703,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 467,700,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 485,965,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The Construction, minor projects account provides for constructing, altering, extending, and improving any of the facilities 

(including parking) under the jurisdiction or for the use of the VA, 

including planning, CARES activities, assessment of needs, architectural and engineering services, and site acquisition, where the 

estimated cost of a project is equal to or less than $10,000,000. 

Public Law 106–117, the Veterans Millennium Health Care and 

Benefits Act of 1999, gave the VA the authority to make capital 

contributions from minor construction in enhanced-use leases. Proceeds realized from enhanced-use lease activities may be deposited 

into the Construction, major projects and Construction, minor 

projects accounts. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $485,965,000 for minor construction. This is $217,035,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level 

and $18,265,000 above the budget request. 
66 

The Committee has provided an additional $8,265,000 for construction and renovation needs associated with the hiring of new 

claims processors. The recommendation includes $386,977,000 for 

the Veterans Health Administration, $43,573,000 for the National 

Cemetery Administration, $22,625,000 for General Administration—Staff Offices, and $22,790,000 for the Veterans Benefits Administration. The Committee directs the Department to provide an 

expenditure plan within 30 days of enactment of this act for the 

amount appropriated for minor construction. 

Family Friendly Homeless Veterans Housing Initiative.—The recommendation includes an additional $10,000,000 for the VA’s 

building reuse initiative. This new initiative is a fast-track process 

that identifies and evaluates underutilized buildings in VA’s inventory for potential reuse. Once identified, opportunities will be pursued through either Enhanced Use Lease agreements, minor construction or a sharing agreement to bring services, including homeless programs, to veterans in the quickest manner possible. The review is also identifying buildings for demolition where land could 

then be redeveloped for homeless housing. In fiscal year 2010, the 

VA utilized a portion of the $50,000,000 provided by Congress last 

year for minor construction needs to serve homeless veterans. 

These funds are being used to bring identified buildings up to code 

by remediating environmental and safety deficiencies, including asbestos abatement, enabling reuse development design and construction to move forward. The Committee directs that the additional 

funds included in the recommendation be used for conversion of 

surplus or underutilized buildings on VA campuses for housing 

homeless veterans and their families, with a particular emphasis 

on women veterans as well as veterans at risk for homelessness. 

The Committee further directs that a portion of these funds be 

used for renovation and construction at medical centers that serve 

rural or highly rural populations. The Department is directed to 

submit an expenditure plan for this initiative within 60 days of enactment of the act, to the Committees on Appropriations of both 

Houses of Congress. 

GRANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STATE EXTENDED CARE FACILITIES

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $100,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 85,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 85,000,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This account is used to provide grants to assist States in acquiring or constructing State home facilities for furnishing domiciliary 

or nursing home care to veterans, and to expand, remodel or alter 

existing buildings for furnishing domiciliary, nursing home, or hospital care to veterans in State homes. The grant may not exceed 

65 percent of the total cost of the project. Public Law 102–585 

granted permanent authority for this program, and Public Law 

106–117 provided greater specificity in directing VA to prescribe 

regulations for the number of beds for which grant assistance may 

be furnished. This program has been a successful partnership between the States and the VA in meeting the long-term care needs 

of elderly veterans for decades. 
67 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $85,000,000 for grants for the construction of State extended care facilities. This is $15,000,000 

below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget 

request. 

Long-term Care.—The Committee is concerned about the VA’s 

ability to plan for and meet the long-term care needs of America’s 

veterans. The Committee is aware that the VA has decreased Community Living Center [CLC] capacity and that 65 percent of patient workload is now being met by community and State veterans 

homes. In light of the projected increase in elderly veterans in future years, additional State veterans homes will need to be built. 

However, given the ongoing budget deficits being experienced by 

State governments across the country, the Committee is concerned 

that the States will be unable to contribute the requisite 35 percent 

of total construction costs needed to obtain Federal matching funds. 

Accordingly, the Committee urges the VA to explore alternative financing mechanisms to ensure that a sufficient number of State 

veterans homes are available to meet the needs of future patients. 

Walla Walla State Veterans Home.—The Committee is aware of 

the collaborative efforts of the Walla Walla VA Medical Center and 

the Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs to meet the 

long-term care needs of veterans in southeast Washington and 

northern Oregon by building a long-term care facility on the Walla 

Walla VA Medical Center grounds. The Committee supports the 

creation of a jointly operated veterans home in Walla Walla, Washington. The establishment of this new veterans home will complement the expanded Community Based Outpatient Clinic in 

Walla Walla offering a variety of specialty services and providing 

great value to the adjacent home. The Committee is also supportive 

of the development of a tri-state compact allowing eligible residents 

in Oregon and Idaho access to the new State veterans home. 

GRANTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STATE VETERANS CEMETERIES

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $46,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 46,000,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 46,000,000 

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Public Law 105–368 amended title 38 U.S.C. 2408 and established authority to provide aid to States for establishment, expansion, and improvement of State veterans cemeteries, which are operated and permanently maintained by the States. This statutory 

change increased the maximum Federal share from 50 percent to 

100 percent in order to fund construction costs and the initial 

equipment expenses when the cemetery is established. The States 

remain responsible for providing the land and for paying all costs 

related to the operation and maintenance of the State cemeteries, 

including the costs for subsequent equipment purchases. 
68 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $46,000,000 for grants for the construction of State veterans cemeteries. This is equal to the fiscal 

year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. The Committee includes a provision which outlines reprogramming authority and responsibilities for the Veterans Benefits Administration. 

SEC. 202. The Committee includes a provision which outlines reprogramming authority and responsibilities for the Veterans 

Health Administration. 

SEC. 203. The Committee includes a provision which outlines the 

use of the Salaries and expenses account. 

SEC. 204. The Committee includes a provision mandating that 

only construction funds may be used for land procurement. 

SEC. 205. The Committee includes a provision allowing for reimbursements to the Medical services account. 

SEC. 206. The Committee includes a provision allowing for payments of prior year obligations. 

SEC. 207. The Committee includes a provision which allows for 

the use of fiscal year 2010 funds for prior year obligations. 

SEC. 208. The Committee includes a provision which allows for 

payments from the National Service Life Insurance Fund. 

SEC. 209. The Committee includes a provision which outlines the 

use of funds from enhanced-use lease proceeds. 

SEC. 210. The Committee includes a provision which provides for 

funds for the Office of Resolution Management and the Office of 

Employment Discrimination Complaint Adjudication. 

SEC. 211. The Committee includes a provision which sets a limit 

on new leases without congressional approval. 

SEC. 212. The Committee includes a provision which requires disclosure of third-party reimbursement information. 

SEC. 213. The Committee includes a provision which allows for 

the transfer of revenue derived from enhanced use leases into the 

construction accounts. 

SEC. 214. The Committee includes a provision which outlines authorized uses for medical services funds. 

SEC. 215. The Committee includes a provision which allows funds 

in the Medical Care Collection Fund to be transferred into the 

Medical Services account. 

SEC. 216. The Committee includes a provision which allows eligible veterans in the State of Alaska to obtain medical care services. 

SEC. 217. The Committee includes a provision which allows for 

the transfer of funds into the construction accounts. 

SEC. 218. The Committee includes a provision which allows for 

outreach and marketing to enroll new veterans. 

SEC. 219. The Committee includes a provision requiring the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit quarterly financial reports on 

the Veterans Health Administration. 

SEC. 220. The Committee includes a provision outlining transfer 

authority to the information technology systems account. 
69 

SEC. 221. The Committee includes a provision outlining limits on 

transfers within the information technology systems account. 

SEC. 222 The Committee includes a provision allowing the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to transfer limited funds to the Department of Health and Human Services, Graduate Psychology Education Program. 

SEC. 223. The Committee includes a provision prohibiting any 

funds to be used to contract out any functions performed by more 

than 10 employees without a fair competition process. 

SEC. 224. The Committee includes a provision limiting the 

amount of nonrecurring maintenance funds that can be obligated 

during the last 2 months of the fiscal year. 

SEC. 225. The Committee includes a provision rescinding funds 

from certain accounts and appropriating additional amounts with 

2-year authority. 

SEC. 226. The Committee includes a provision allowing for the 

transfer of funds from certain accounts to the Joint Department of 

Defense/Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund, as authorized by Public Law 111–84. 

SEC. 227. The Committee includes a provision allowing for the 

transfer of certain funds deposited in the Medical Care Collections 

Fund to the Joint Department of Defense/Department of Veterans 

Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund, as authorized by 

Public Law 111–84. 

SEC. 228. The Committee includes a provision allowing a min- imum of $15,000,000 to be transferred from Medical services, Medical support and compliance, and Medical facilities to the Department of Defense/Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Sharing Incentive Fund, as authorized by section 8111 of title 38, 

United States Code. 

SEC. 229. The Committee includes a provision providing an additional amount to the General administration account to increase 

the Department’s acquisition workforce. This provision was included as title V general provision in the administration’s budget 

submission. This provision only applies to the Department of Veterans Affairs; therefore, the Committee has included it as an administrative provision in title II. 

SEC. 230. The Committee includes a provision requiring notification of all bid savings for major construction projects. 

SEC. 231. The Committee includes a provision for the construction of a major medical facility. 
(70) 

TITLE III 

RELATED AGENCIES 

AMERICAN BATTLE MONUMENTS COMMISSION

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The American Battle Monuments Commission [ABMC] is responsible for the following: the maintenance and construction of U.S. 

monuments and memorials commemorating the achievements in 

battle of our Armed Forces since April 1917 (the date of the United 

States entry into World War I); the erection of monuments and 

markers by U.S. citizens and organizations in foreign countries; 

and the design, construction, and maintenance of permanent military cemetery memorials in foreign countries. The Commission 

maintains 24 military memorial cemeteries and 31 monuments, 

memorials, and markers in 15 countries around the world, including three memorials on U.S. soil. 

SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $62,675,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 64,200,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 67,200,000 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $67,200,000 for the Salaries and expenses account. This amount is $4,525,000 above the fiscal year 

2010 enacted level and $3,000,000 above the budget request. The 

Committee has provided additional funds to support the expansion 

of ABMC’s interpretive program and for nonrecurring maintenance 

needs. 

FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $17,100,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 20,200,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 20,200,000 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends an estimated $20,200,000 for the 

Foreign currency fluctuation account. This amount is $3,100,000 

above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget 

request. 

The Committee has again included language in the accompanying bill, as proposed by the administration, that would allow 

funding for this account on a ‘‘such sums as necessary’’ basis. 

Funding the account in this manner allows the Commission to 

maintain cemeteries regardless of the volatility of foreign currency 

fluctuations. 
71 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

OVERVIEW

The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims was established 

by the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act of 1988. The Court is an independent judicial tribunal with exclusive jurisdiction to review decisions of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. It has the authority to decide all relevant questions of law; interpret constitutional, statutory, and regulatory provisions; and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an action by the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs. It is authorized to compel action by the Secretary. It is authorized to hold unconstitutional or otherwise unlawful and set 

aside decisions, findings, conclusions, rules and regulations issued 

or adopted by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, or the Chairman of the Board that are found to be 

arbitrary or capricious. The Court’s principal office location is 

Washington, DC; however, it is a national court, empowered to sit 

anywhere in the United States. 

SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $27,115,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 90,147,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 53,297,000 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $53,297,000 for the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for Veterans Claims. This amount is an increase of 

$26,182,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and 

$36,850,000 below the budget request. 

The Committee is aware that beginning in fiscal year 2011, the 

Administrative Office of the Courts will no longer provide support 

for the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims electronic case 

management system. Therefore, the recommendation includes an 

additional $150,000 for the Court to hire additional information 

technology staff to support the electronic case management system. 

The administration’s budget request also included $62,000,000, to 

be transferred to the General Services Administration [GSA], for 

the construction of a new courthouse. The Committee strongly supports construction of this facility and has provided $25,000,000 as 

the first increment in funding. The Committee based this recommendation on several factors, including the amount of funds 

that could be obligated during fiscal year 2011. GSA has indicated 

that the final feasibility study will be completed and released to 

the Committee by the end of July. Depending on the results of the 

study, such as environmental remediation, costs could increase 

above the $62,000,000 estimate contained in the budget request. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—CIVIL

CEMETERIAL EXPENSES, ARMY

OVERVIEW

The Secretary of the Army is responsible for the administration, 

operation and maintenance of Arlington National Cemetery and 
72 

the Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery. In addition to 

its principal function as a national cemetery, Arlington is the site 

of approximately 3,200 nonfuneral ceremonies each year and has 

approximately 4 million visitors annually. 

SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $39,850,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 38,100,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 43,100,000 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $43,100,000 for the Cemeterial expenses, Army account. This amount is $3,250,000 above the fiscal 

year 2010 enacted level and $5,000,000 above the budget request. 

The Committee is greatly concerned about the shocking mismanagement of Arlington National Cemetery [ANC] as revealed in 

the June 10, 2010, Army Inspector General report. As a sacred 

symbol of the sacrifices that America’s military forces have made 

for this Nation since the Civil War, Arlington Cemetery must be 

held to the highest standards. Clearly, those standards have not 

been met for many years. The Committee welcomes the Army’s 

swift actions to address the systemic failures identified in the report through the establishment of a new position of Executive Director for the cemetery, the appointment by the Department of Veterans Affairs [VA] of an interim Superintendent, and the creation 

of an independent Army National Cemeteries Advisory Commission, led by former Senator and World War II veteran Bob Dole 

and former Senator, Vietnam veteran, and current Secretary of the 

American Battle Monuments Commission Max Cleland. The Committee also commends the dedication of the Arlington National 

Cemetery workforce, which has carried out its responsibilities with 

professionalism and attentiveness to the families of America’s war 

heroes and veterans under extraordinarily trying circumstances. 

The Committee also welcomes the aggressive schedule that the 

new ANC management team has set to identify and correct deficiencies in the operation and management of the cemetery, including a lack of established policies and procedures, a failure to automate recordkeeping, and the misidentification of hundreds of 

gravesites at the cemetery. The Committee urges ANC to also examine cemeterial operations at the Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home 

National Cemetery in Washington, DC, which ANC also operates, 

and provide recommendations for operational and management improvements if needed. Until the full scope of the deficiencies at Arlington Cemetery has been identified and ANC submits a comprehensive plan for corrective action, the Committee is reluctant to 

prescribe any policy changes. However, the Committee has provided an additional $5,000,000 for cemetery operations for fiscal 

year 2011 to enable ANC to implement urgently needed management improvements, including the hiring of additional staff if needed and the automation of the cemetery’s recordkeeping system. The 

Committee also encourages ANC to draw from the VA’s expertise 

in cemeterial management, and to determine the feasibility of 

adapting the VA’s automated recordkeeping information technology 
73 

system, which is a proven system available immediately, for use at 

the national cemeteries. 

The Committee directs ANC to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress an expenditure plan for 

the additional funds prior to obligation. The Committee also directs 

ANC to provide quarterly reports, beginning with the first quarter 

after enactment of this act, on the steps it is taking to correct deficiencies at the national cemeteries, funding requirements to implement those measures, and a progress report on the status of automating ANC’s recordkeeping. Beginning with the submission of the 

fiscal year 2012 budget request, the Committee directs ANC to provide a breakdown by category (e.g., salaries, operation and maintenance, and information technology) of its budget request, and the 

amount of funding that is intended to be obligated within the fiscal 

year. 

ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME

TRUST FUND

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $134,000,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 71,200,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 71,200,000 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends authority to expend $71,200,000 

from the Armed Forces Retirement Home [AFRH] Trust Fund to 

operate and maintain the Armed Forces Retirement Home—Washington, DC, and the Armed Forces Retirement Home—Gulfport, 

Mississippi. This amount is $62,800,000 below the fiscal year 2010 

enacted level for the Trust Fund and equal to the budget request. 
(74) 

TITLE IV 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

OVERVIEW

The President’s fiscal year 2011 overseas contingency operations [OCO] request for military construction totals $1,257,002,000 to 

support the realignment of U.S. forces into and within Afghanistan. 

The request includes funding for operational facilities, roads and 

bridges, utility infrastructure, force protection, logistics and support facilities, and environmental mitigation projects such as incinerators. The Committee recognizes the importance of providing adequate expeditionary facilities for U.S. combat forces in Afghanistan 

and supports the policy of the Department of Defense to carry out 

the minimum construction necessary to support operations and provide force protection. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $924,484,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 929,996,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,045,676,000 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $1,045,676,000 for Army overseas 

contingency operations construction for fiscal year 2011. This 

amount is $115,680,000 above the budget request. The Committee 

notes that a number of Army OCO projects for which funding was 

requested in the fiscal year 2011 budget submission have either 

been accelerated or cancelled, and has therefore deleted funding for 

those projects and substituted other projects in Afghanistan requested by the administration in the regular fiscal year 2011 budget request or by the Army in updated OCO project requests. 

The Committee understands that changing strategic requirements on the ground and the cancellation or acceleration of funding 

for certain projects can alter the details of the OCO military construction budget request. The Committee has endeavored to accommodate those changes identified by the services, and thus the list 

of OCO military construction projects included in the table at the 

end of this report reflects both the original budget request and the 

updated requirements identified by the services. The Committee 

believes that all military construction in Afghanistan is related to 

the war effort, and has also shifted funding for military construction in Afghanistan that was included in the regular budget request to the OCO Committee recommendation. 

The Committee recognizes the evolving nature of military construction needs in a war zone, and to give the services more flexi-
75 

bility to meet unforeseen operational requirements has included an 

additional $20,000,000 in unspecified minor construction funding 

for both the Army and the Air Force. For the past several years, 

the Department has sought to raise the spending limit on the use 

of operation and maintenance funds for unspecified minor military 

construction from $750,000 to $1,500,000 (or $3,000,000 for projects 

to correct a life, safety, or health deficiency) when used for projects 

in support of a contingency, such as the war in Afghanistan. The 

Committee believes that, to the extent possible, military construction projects should be funded within military construction accounts and subject to military construction authorities and oversight. The intent of the unspecified minor construction account is 

to give the services the flexibility to fund construction projects up 

to $2,000,000, or $3,000,000 to meet life, safety or health requirements, without the requirement to seek prior authorization. The 

Committee further urges the Department and the services to program adequate funding for OCO unspecified minor construction in 

future budget submissions to provide the degree of flexibility needed to respond to emerging wartime requirements. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. $474,500,000 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... 280,506,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 164,826,000 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $164,826,000 for Air Force overseas 

contingency operations construction for fiscal year 2011, 

$115,680,000 below the budget request. Within this amount, the 

Committee has adjusted funding for specific projects to reflect accelerations, cancellations, or cost changes. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2010 ............................................................................. ........................... 

Budget estimate, 2011 ........................................................................... $46,500,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 46,500,000 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $46,500,000 for Defense-Wide overseas contingency operations construction for fiscal year 2011, equal 

to the President’s budget request. 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISION

SEC. 401. The Committee includes a provision regarding funding 

for this title. 
(76) 

TITLE V 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

SEC. 501. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits the 

obligation of funds beyond the current fiscal year unless expressly 

so provided. 

SEC. 502. The Committee includes a provision that requires pay 

raises to be absorbed within the levels appropriated. 

SEC. 503. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits the 

use of funds for programs, projects or activities not in compliance 

with Federal law relating to risk assessment, the protection of private property rights, or unfunded mandates. 

SEC. 504. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits the 

use of funds to support or defeat legislation pending before Congress. 

SEC. 505. The Committee includes a provision that encourages 

the expansion of E-commerce technologies and procedures. 

SEC. 506. The Committee includes a provision that limits funds 

from being transferred from this appropriations measure to any instrumentality of the United States Government without authority 

from an appropriations act. 

SEC. 507. The Committee includes a provision that specifies the 

congressional committees that are to receive all reports and 

notifications. 
(77) 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports accompanying general appropriations bills identify each recommended 

amendment which proposes an item of appropriation which is not 

made to carry out the provisions of an existing law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously passed by the Senate during that session. The Committee is filing an original bill, which is 

not covered under this rule, but reports this information in the 

spirit of full disclosure. The Committee recommends funding for 

the following programs which currently lack authorization: 

Title I: Department of Defense 

Military Construction, Army 

Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps 

Military Construction, Air Force 

Military Construction, Defense-Wide 

Military Construction, Army National Guard 

Military Construction, Air National Guard 

Military Construction, Army Reserve 

Military Construction, Navy Reserve 

Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Security Investment Program 

Family Housing Construction, Army 

Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Army 

Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps 

Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Navy and Marine 

Corps 

Family Housing Construction, Air Force 

Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Air Force 

Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide 

Department of Defense, Family Housing Improvement Fund 

Homeowners Assistance Fund 

Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense-Wide 

Base Realignment and Closure Account, 1990 

Base Realignment and Closure Account, 2005 

Title II: Department of Veterans Affairs 

Veterans Health Administration 

National Cemetery Administration 

Departmental Administration 

Title III: Related Agencies 

American Battle Monuments Commission 

U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

Cemeterial Expenses, Army 
78 

Armed Forces Retirement Home 

Title IV: Overseas Contingency Operations 

Military Construction, Army 

Military Construction, Air Force 

Military Construction, Defense-Wide 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 15, 2010, the 

Committee ordered reported en bloc an original bill (S. 3606) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and 

Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal 

year ending September 30, 2011, and for other purposes; an original bill (S. 3607) making appropriations for the Department of 

Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011 

and for other purposes; and an original bill (S. 3615) making appropriations military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2011, and for other purposes, with each subject to amendment and 

subject to the Committee Spending Guidance, and authorized the 

chairman of the committee or the chairman of the subcommittee to 

offer the text of the Senate-reported bill as a committee amendment in the nature of a substitute to the House companion measure, by a recorded vote of 17–12, a quorum being present. The vote 

was as follows: 

Yeas Nays 

Chairman Inouye Mr. Cochran 

Mr. Leahy Mr. Bond 

Mr. Harkin Mr. McConnell 

Ms. Mikulski Mr. Shelby 

Mr. Kohl Mr. Gregg 

Mrs. Murray Mr. Bennett 

Mr. Dorgan Mrs. Hutchison 

Mrs. Feinstein Mr. Brownback 

Mr. Durbin Mr. Alexander 

Mr. Johnson Ms. Collins 

Ms. Landrieu Mr. Voinovich 

Mr. Reed Ms. Murkowski 

Mr. Lautenberg 

Mr. Nelson 

Mr. Pryor 

Mr. Tester 

Mr. Specter 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports on 

a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute or part 

of any statute include ‘‘(a) the text of the statute or part thereof 

which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a comparative print of 

that part of the bill or joint resolution making the amendment and 

of the statute or part thereof proposed to be amended, showing by 
79 

stricken-through type and italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical devices the omissions and insertions which 

would be made by the bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form 

recommended by the committee.’’ 

The Committee bill as recommended contains no such provisions. 

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL 

PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 

308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93–344, AS AMENDED 

[In millions of dollars] 

Budget authority Outlays 

Committee 

guidance 1

Amount 

of bill 

Committee 

guidance 1

Amount 

of bill 

Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee Spending 

Guidance to its subcommittees for 2011: Subcommittee on 

Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies: 

Mandatory ............................................................................ NA 69,297 NA 2 69,050 

Discretionary ........................................................................ NA 77,253 NA 2 80,961 

General purpose .......................................................... 75,996 75,996 NA NA 

Overseas deployment .................................................. 1,258 1,257 NA NA 

Projection of outlays associated with the recommendation: 

2011 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 3 73,529 

2012 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 10,030 

2013 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 6,895 

2014 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 2,761 

2015 and future years ........................................................ .................... .................... .................... 1,929 

Financial assistance to State and local governments for 

2011 ......................................................................................... NA 201 NA 49 

1 There is no section 302(a) allocation to the Commitee for fiscal year 2011. 

2 Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

3 Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

NA: Not applicable. 
80 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

ALABAMA 

ARMY: 

FORT RUCKER: 

AVIATION COMPONENT MAINTENANCE SHOP ..................... 29,000 29,000 ..........................

AVIATION MAINTENANCE FACILITY ...................................... 36,000 36,000 ..........................

TRAINING AIDS CENTER ..................................................... 4,650 4,650 ..........................

NAVY: 

MOBILE: 

T–6 SOLO CAPABLE OUTLYING LANDING FIELD ................. 29,082 29,082 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

MAXWELL AFB: 

ADAL AIR UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ......................................... 13,400 13,400 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

FORT MCCLELLAN: 

LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE ................................................... .......................... 5,635 ∂5,635 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

MONTGOMERY REGIONAL AIRPORT ANGB: 

FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR ............... 7,472 7,472 ..........................

REPLACE SQUAD OPS FACILITY .......................................... .......................... 7,500 ∂7,500 

TOTAL, ALABAMA ............................................................ 119,604 132,739 ∂13,135 

ALASKA 

ARMY: 

FORT GREELY: 

FIRE STATION ..................................................................... 26,000 26,000 ..........................

FORT RICHARDSON: 

BRIGADE COMPLEX, PH 1 .................................................. 67,038 67,038 ..........................

MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE .............................. 12,200 12,200 ..........................

SIMULATIONS CENTER ........................................................ 34,000 34,000 ..........................

FORT WAINWRIGHT: 

AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 1 INCR 2 ................ 30,000 .......................... −30,000 

AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 2A INC 1 

(HANGAR) ....................................................................... 142,650 92,650 −50,000 

AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 2B [COF] ................ 27,000 27,000 ..........................

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .................................................. 3,350 3,350 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

EIELSON AFB: 

REPAIR CENTRAL HEAT PLANT AND POWER PLANT BOILERS ................................................................................ 28,000 28,000 ..........................

ELMENDORF AFB: 

ADD/ALTER ASOS TRAINING FACILITY ................................ 4,749 4,749 ..........................

CONSTRUCT RAILHEAD OPERATIONS FACILITY ................... 15,000 15,000 ..........................

DOD JOINT REGIONAL FIRE TRAINING FACILITY ................. .......................... 6,600 ∂6,600 

F–22 ADAL WEAPONS RELEASE SYSTEMS SHOP & AME ... 10,525 10,525 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE: 

ADD/ALTER COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ............................ .......................... 6,500 ∂6,500 

TOTAL, ALASKA ............................................................... 400,512 333,612 −66,900 

ARIZONA 

NAVY: 

YUMA: 

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ..................................... 63,280 63,280 ..........................

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ..................................... 40,600 40,600 ..........................

COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADE ................ 63,730 63,730 ..........................

INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY FACILITY .............. 21,480 21,480 ..........................

SIMULATOR FACILITY .......................................................... 36,060 36,060 ..........................
81 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES ............................ 44,320 44,320 ..........................

VAN PAD COMPLEX RELOCATION ....................................... 15,590 15,590 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB: 

AMARG HANGAR ................................................................. 25,000 25,000 ..........................

HC–130 AGE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............................... 4,600 4,600 ..........................

HC–130J AERIAL CARGO FACILITY ..................................... 10,700 10,700 ..........................

HC–130J PARTS STORE ...................................................... 8,200 8,200 ..........................

FORT HUACHUCA: 

TFI—PREDATOR LRE BEDDOWN ........................................ 11,000 11,000 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

YUMA: 

SOF MILITARY FREE FALL SIMULATOR ............................... 8,977 8,977 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

FLORENCE: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 16,500 16,500 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB: 

TFI—PREDATOR FOC—ACTIVE DUTY ASSOCIATE ............. 4,650 4,650 ..........................

TOTAL, ARIZONA ............................................................. 374,687 374,687 ..........................

ARKANSAS 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAMP ROBINSON: 

COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ........................ 30,000 30,000 ..........................

FORT CHAFFEE: 

COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ............ 19,000 19,000 ..........................

CONVOY LIVE FIRE/ENTRY CONTROL POINT RANGE .......... .......................... 3,500 ∂3,500 

LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE ................................................... 2,500 2,500 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE: 

FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR ............... .......................... 10,400 ∂10,400 

TOTAL, ARKANSAS .......................................................... 51,500 65,400 ∂13,900 

CALIFORNIA 

ARMY: 

PRESIDIO MONTEREY: 

ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS .................... 63,000 63,000 ..........................

GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING ..................................... 39,000 39,000 ..........................

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ............................. 38,000 38,000 ..........................

NAVY: 

CAMP PENDLETON: 

BEQ—13 AREA .................................................................. 42,864 42,864 ..........................

BEQ—LAS FLORES ............................................................. 37,020 37,020 ..........................

CNATT/FRS—AVIATION TRAINING AND BEQ ....................... 66,110 66,110 ..........................

CONVEYANCE/WATER TREATMENT ...................................... 100,700 100,700 ..........................

MALS–39 MAINTENANCE HANGAR EXPANSION .................. 48,230 48,230 ..........................

MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE ................................... 9,950 9,950 ..........................

NORTH REGION TERT TREAT PLANT, INCR 2 ..................... 30,000 30,000 ..........................

SMALL ARMS MAGAZINE—EDSON RANGE ......................... 3,760 3,760 ..........................

TRUCK COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX .......................... 53,490 53,490 ..........................

CORONADO: 

ROTARY HANGAR ................................................................ 67,160 67,160 ..........................

MIRAMAR: 

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ..................................... 90,490 90,490 ..........................

HANGAR 4 .......................................................................... 33,620 33,620 ..........................

PARKING APRON/TAXIWAY EXPANSION ............................... 66,500 66,500 ..........................
82 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

SAN DIEGO: 

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, HOMEPORT ASHORE ..... 75,342 75,342 ..........................

BERTHING PIER 12 REPL & DREDGING, PHASE 1 ............. 108,414 108,414 ..........................

MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE ................................... 9,950 9,950 ..........................

TWENTYNINE PALMS: 

BEQ AND PARKING STRUCTURE ......................................... 53,158 53,158 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

EDWARDS AFB: 

FLIGHTLINE FIRE STATION .................................................. .......................... 15,500 ∂15,500 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

POINT LOMA ANNEX: 

REPLACE STORAGE FACILITY, INCR 3 ................................ 20,000 20,000 ..........................

POINT MUGU: 

AIRCRAFT DIRECT FUELING STATION ................................. 3,100 3,100 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAMP ROBERTS: 

COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ............ 19,000 19,000 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

FAIRFIELD: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER .................................................... 26,000 26,000 ..........................

FORT HUNTER LIGGETT: 

ECS TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY .......... 22,000 22,000 ..........................

ECS WAREHOUSE ............................................................... 15,000 15,000 ..........................

GRENADE LAUNCHER RANGE ............................................. 1,400 1,400 ..........................

HAND GRENADE FAMILIARIZATION RANGE (LIVE) .............. 1,400 1,400 ..........................

LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE ................................................. 2,700 2,700 ..........................

TACTICAL VEHICLE WASH RACK ......................................... 9,500 9,500 ..........................

NAVY RESERVE: 

TWENTYNINE PALMS: 

TANK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............................. 5,991 5,991 ..........................

TOTAL, CALIFORNIA ........................................................ 1,162,849 1,178,349 ∂15,500 

COLORADO 

ARMY: 

FORT CARSON: 

AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE ............................ 3,650 3,650 ..........................

BATTALION HEADQUARTERS ............................................... 6,700 6,700 ..........................

BRIGADE COMPLEX ............................................................ 56,000 56,000 ..........................

SIMULATIONS CENTER ........................................................ 40,000 40,000 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE: 

LAND ACQUISITION ............................................................. .......................... 10,000 ∂10,000 

SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS FACILITY ......................... 12,160 12,160 ..........................

PETERSON AFB: 

RAIDRS SPACE CONTROL FACILITY .................................... 24,800 24,800 ..........................

U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY: 

CENTER FOR CHARACTER & LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................. 27,600 27,600 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

FORT CARSON: 

SOF TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE HANGAR ....... 3,717 3,717 ..........................

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE: 

PUEBLO DEPOT: 

AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY, PH XII ............. 65,569 65,569 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

COLORADO SPRINGS: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 20,000 20,000 ..........................

FORT CARSON: 

REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE .......................................... 40,000 40,000 ..........................
83 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

GYPSUM: 

HIGH ALTITUDE SUPPORT FACILITY .................................... 39,000 39,000 ..........................

WINDSOR: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 7,500 7,500 ..........................

TOTAL, COLORADO ......................................................... 346,696 356,696 ∂10,000 

CONNECTICUT 

NAVY: 

NSB NEW LONDON: 

SUBMARINE GROUP TWO HEADQUARTERS ......................... .......................... 12,930 ∂12,930 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

WINDSOR LOCKS: 

READINESS CENTER (AVIATION) ......................................... 41,000 41,000 ..........................

TOTAL, CONNECTICUT .................................................... 41,000 53,930 ∂12,930 

DELAWARE 

AIR FORCE: 

DOVER AFB: 

C–5M/C–17 MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY, PH 2 ...... 3,200 3,200 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

NEW CASTLE: 

ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER [JFHQ] ........................ 27,000 27,000 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

NEW CASTLE COUNTY AIRPORT: 

C–130 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SHOPS, PH 3 ................. .......................... 8,700 ∂8,700 

JOINT FORCES OPERATIONS CENTER–ANG SHARE ............ 1,500 1,500 ..........................

TOTAL, DELAWARE ......................................................... 31,700 40,400 ∂8,700 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

AIR FORCE: 

BOLLING AFB: 

JOINT AIR DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER ......................... 13,200 13,200 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE: 

REPLACE PARKING STRUCTURE, PHASE 1 ......................... 3,000 3,000 ..........................

TOTAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ..................................... 16,200 16,200 ..........................

FLORIDA 

ARMY: 

EGLIN AFB: 

CHAPEL ............................................................................... 6,900 6,900 ..........................

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY (HOMESTEAD AFB): 

COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY ................................... 41,000 41,000 ..........................

U.S. ARMY GARRISON MIAMI: 

COMMISSARY ...................................................................... 19,000 .......................... −19,000 

NAVY: 

BLOUNT ISLAND MCSF: 

CONSOLIDATED WAREHOUSE FACILITY ............................... 17,260 17,260 ..........................

CONTAINER STAGING AND LOADING LOT ........................... 5,990 5,990 ..........................

CONTAINER STORAGE LOT .................................................. 4,910 4,910 ..........................

HARDSTAND EXTENSION ..................................................... 17,930 17,930 ..........................

PAINT AND BLAST FACILITY ................................................ 18,840 18,840 ..........................

WASHRACK EXPANSION ...................................................... 9,690 9,690 ..........................

NSA PANAMA CITY: 

LAND ACQUISITION (9 ACRES) ........................................... .......................... 5,960 ∂5,960 
84 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

TAMPA: 

JCSE VEHICLE PAINT FACILITY ........................................... 2,300 2,300 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

EGLIN AFB: 

F–35 FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE HANGAR .......................... 11,400 11,400 ..........................

HURLBURT FIELD: 

ADAL SPECIAL OPERATIONS SCHOOL FACILITY .................. 6,170 6,170 ..........................

ADD TO VISITING QUARTERS (24 RM) ............................... 4,500 4,500 ..........................

BASE LOGISTICS FACILITY .................................................. 24,000 24,000 ..........................

PATRICK AFB: 

AIR FORCE TECHNICAL APPLICATION CENTER INC 1 ........ 158,009 100,009 −58,000 

RELOCATE MAIN GATE ........................................................ .......................... 8,000 ∂8,000 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

EGLIN AFB: 

SOF GROUND SUPPORT BATTALION DETACHMENT ............. 6,030 6,030 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

JACKSONVILLE IAP: 

SECURITY FORCES TRAINING FACILITY .............................. 6,700 6,700 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

MIAMI: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 13,800 13,800 ..........................

ORLANDO: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 10,200 10,200 ..........................

WEST PALM BEACH: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 10,400 10,400 ..........................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: 

PATRICK AFB: 

WEAPONS MAINTENANCE FACILITY ..................................... 3,420 3,420 ..........................

TOTAL, FLORIDA ............................................................. 398,449 335,409 −63,040 

GEORGIA 

ARMY: 

FORT BENNING: 

LAND ACQUISITION ............................................................. 12,200 12,200 ..........................

MUSEUM OPERATIONS SUPPORT BUILDING ....................... 32,000 .......................... −32,000 

TRAINEE BARRACKS PH 2 .................................................. 51,000 51,000 ..........................

TRAINING BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 2 ............................... 14,600 14,600 ..........................

TRAINING BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 2 ............................... 14,600 14,600 ..........................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................ 53,000 53,000 ..........................

FORT GORDON: 

QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE ....................................... .......................... 8,100 ∂8,100 

TRAINING AIDS CENTER ..................................................... 4,150 4,150 ..........................

FORT STEWART: 

AUTOMATED INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE ............ 6,200 6,200 ..........................

AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE .......... 9,100 9,100 ..........................

AVIATION UNIT OPERATIONS COMPLEX .............................. 47,000 47,000 ..........................

BATTALION COMPLEX ......................................................... 18,000 18,000 ..........................

GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING ..................................... 8,200 8,200 ..........................

MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE ........................................ 3,750 3,750 ..........................

SIMULATIONS CENTER ........................................................ 26,000 26,000 ..........................

TRAINING AIDS CENTER ..................................................... 7,000 7,000 ..........................

NAVY: 

KINGS BAY: 

SECURITY ENCLAVE & VEHICLE BARRIERS ....................... 45,004 45,004 ..........................

WATERFRONT EMERGENCY POWER .................................... 15,660 15,660 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

AUGUSTA: 

NSA/CSS GEORGIA TRAINING FACILITY .............................. 12,855 12,855 ..........................
85 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

FORT BENNING: 

DEXTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONSTRUCT GYM ............. 2,800 2,800 ..........................

SOF COMPANY SUPPORT FACILITY ..................................... 20,441 20,441 ..........................

SOF MWD KENNEL COMPLEX ............................................. 3,624 3,624 ..........................

FORT STEWART: 

HEALTH CLINIC ADDTION/ALTERATION ............................... 35,100 35,100 ..........................

HUNTER ANGS: 

FUEL UNLOAD FACILITY ...................................................... 2,400 2,400 ..........................

HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD: 

SOF TEMF EXPANSION ........................................................ 3,318 3,318 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CUMMING: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 17,000 17,000 ..........................

DOBBINS ARB: 

READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ............................................ 10,400 10,400 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

SAVANNAH/HILTON HEAD IAP: 

RELOCATE ASOS FACILITY .................................................. 7,450 7,450 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

MACON: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 11,400 11,400 ..........................

TOTAL, GEORGIA ............................................................ 494,252 470,352 −23,900 

HAWAII 

ARMY: 

FORT SHAFTER: 

COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY, PH 1 ......................... 58,000 58,000 ..........................

FLOOD MITIGATION ............................................................. 23,000 23,000 ..........................

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS: 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 98,000 98,000 ..........................

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 90,000 90,000 ..........................

TRAINING AIDS CENTER ..................................................... 24,000 24,000 ..........................

TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER: 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 28,000 28,000 ..........................

NAVY: 

CAMP SMITH: 

PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER ............................................... 29,960 29,960 ..........................

KANEOHE BAY: 

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ....................................... 90,530 90,530 ..........................

WATERFRONT OPERATIONS FACILITY .................................. 19,130 19,130 ..........................

PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE FACILITY: 

CONSTRUCT PRE-FABRICATED BRIDGE AT NOHILI 

DITCH ............................................................................. .......................... 3,560 ∂3,560 

REPLACE NORTH LOOP ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ................................................................................ .......................... 9,100 ∂9,100 

PEARL HARBOR: 

CENTER FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT/HUMANITARIAN: 

ASSISTANCE ............................................................... 9,140 9,140 ..........................

FIRE STATION, WEST LOCH ................................................ .......................... 9,084 ∂9,084 

WELDING SCHOOL SHOP CONSOLIDATION .......................... .......................... 8,500 ∂8,500 

JOINT POW/MIA ACCOUNTING COMMAND ........................... 99,328 99,328 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

HICKAM AFB: 

ALTER FUEL STORAGE TANKS ............................................ 8,500 8,500 ..........................

PEARL HARBOR: 

NSWG3 COMMAND AND OPERATIONS FACILITY ................. 28,804 28,804 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

KALAELOA: 

COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ........................ 38,000 38,000 ..........................
86 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

HICKAM AFB: 

TFI—F–22 BEDDOWN INTRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ........... 5,950 5,950 ..........................

TFI—F–22 HANGAR, SQUADRON OPERATIONS AND AMU .. 48,250 48,250 ..........................

TFI—F–22 UPGRADE MUNITIONS COMPLEX ...................... 17,250 17,250 ..........................

TOTAL, HAWAII ............................................................... 715,842 746,086 ∂30,244 

IDAHO 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

MOUNTAIN HOME AFB: 

REPLACE POL FUEL STORAGE TANKS ................................ 27,500 27,500 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

GOWEN FIELD: 

BARRACKS [ORTC] PH 1 .................................................... 17,500 17,500 ..........................

MOUNTAIN HOME: 

TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY ........... 6,300 6,300 ..........................

TOTAL, IDAHO ................................................................. 51,300 51,300 ..........................

ILLINOIS 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE: 

FIELD COMMAND FACILITY UPGRADE ................................. 1,388 1,388 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

SPRINGFIELD: 

COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ADD/ALT ......... 15,000 15,000 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAPITAL MAP: 

TFI—CNAF BEDDOWN—UPGRADE FACILITIES ................... 16,700 16,700 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

QUINCY: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 12,200 12,200 ..........................

ROCKFORD USARC: 

UNITED STATES ARMY RESERVE CENTER .......................... .......................... 13,200 ∂13,200 

TOTAL, ILLINOIS ............................................................. 45,288 58,488 ∂13,200 

INDIANA 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

HULMAN REGIONAL AIRPORT: 

TFI—ASOS BEDDOWN—UPGRADE FACILITIES ................... 4,100 4,100 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

MICHIGAN CITY: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 15,500 15,500 ..........................

TOTAL, INDIANA .............................................................. 19,600 19,600 ..........................

IOWA 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAMP DODGE: 

COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ............ .......................... 5,700 ∂5,700 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

DES MOINES: 

CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR ......................................... .......................... 4,700 ∂4,700 

ARMY RESERVE: 

DES MOINES: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER .................................................... 8,175 8,175 ..........................
87 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

TOTAL, IOWA .................................................................. 8,175 18,575 ∂10,400 

KANSAS 

ARMY: 

FORT LEAVENWORTH: 

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................ 7,100 7,100 ..........................

FORT RILEY: 

AUTOMATED INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE ............... 4,100 4,100 ..........................

AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION/TRAINING RANGE ................... 14,800 14,800 ..........................

BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 1 ............................................... 31,000 31,000 ..........................

KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE .................................................. 7,200 7,200 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

FORBES FIELD: 

TAXIWAY ALTERATIONS ....................................................... .......................... 9,036 ∂9,036 

WICHITA: 

FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................ 24,000 24,000 ..........................

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 43,000 43,000 ..........................

TOTAL, KANSAS .............................................................. 131,200 140,236 ∂9,036 

KENTUCKY 

ARMY: 

FORT CAMPBELL: 

AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE ............................ 1,500 1,500 ..........................

BRIGADE COMPLEX ............................................................ 67,000 67,000 ..........................

COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES .................................... 25,000 25,000 ..........................

INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE .................................... .......................... 3,000 ∂3,000 

RAPPELLING TRAINING AREA .............................................. 5,600 5,600 ..........................

SHOOT HOUSE .................................................................... .......................... 3,300 ∂3,300 

UNIT OPERATIONS FACILITIES ............................................ 26,000 26,000 ..........................

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .................................................. 3,300 3,300 ..........................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................ 15,500 15,500 ..........................

FORT KNOX: 

ACCESS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS .................................. 6,000 6,000 ..........................

MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY .............................. 12,800 12,800 ..........................

RAIL HEAD UPGRADE ......................................................... .......................... 18,000 ∂18,000 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

FORT CAMPBELL: 

LANDGRAF HANGAR ADDITION, 160TH SOAR ..................... .......................... 3,600 ∂3,600 

SOF BATTALION OPS COMPLEX .......................................... 38,095 38,095 ..........................

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE: 

BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT: 

AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION PH XI .............................. 59,402 59,402 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

BURLINGTON: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 19,500 19,500 ..........................

TOTAL, KENTUCKY .......................................................... 279,697 307,597 ∂27,900 

LOUISIANA 

ARMY: 

FORT POLK: 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 29,000 29,000 ..........................

EMERGENCY SERVICES CENTER ........................................ .......................... 9,200 ∂9,200 

HEAVY SNIPER RANGE ....................................................... 4,250 4,250 ..........................

LAND ACQUISITION ............................................................. 6,000 6,000 ..........................

LAND ACQUISITION ............................................................. 24,000 24,000 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

BARKSDALE AFB: 

WEAPONS LOAD CREW TRAINING FACILITY ........................ 18,140 18,140 ..........................
88 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

FORT POLK: 

TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY ........... 5,500 5,500 ..........................

MINDEN: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 28,000 28,000 ..........................

NAVY RESERVE: 

NEW ORLEANS: 

JOINT AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITY .............................. 16,281 16,281 ..........................

TOTAL, LOUISIANA .......................................................... 131,171 140,371 ∂9,200 

MAINE 

NAVY: 

PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD: 

CONSOLIDATION OF STRUCTURAL SHOPS .......................... .......................... 17,240 ∂17,240 

TOTAL, MAINE ................................................................ .......................... 17,240 ∂17,240 

MARYLAND 

ARMY: 

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND: 

AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION FACILITY, PH 2 .. 14,600 14,600 ..........................

FORT MEADE: 

INDOOR FIRING RANGE ...................................................... 7,600 7,600 ..........................

WIDEBAND SATCOM OPERATIONS CENTER ........................ 25,000 25,000 ..........................

NAVY: 

INDIAN HEAD: 

AGILE CHEMICAL FACILITY, PHASE 2 ................................. 34,238 34,238 ..........................

ADVANCED ENERGETICS RESEARCH LAB COMPLEX, 

PH 2 ............................................................................... .......................... 12,810 ∂12,810 

PATUXENT RIVER: 

BROAD AREA MARITIME SURVEILLANCE T & E FACILITY .. 42,211 42,211 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND: 

USAMRICD REPLACEMENT, INC 3 ...................................... 105,000 105,000 ..........................

ANDREWS AFB: 

REPLACE FUEL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ......... 14,000 14,000 ..........................

BETHESDA NAVAL HOSPITAL: 

NNMC PARKING EXPANSION ............................................... 17,100 17,100 ..........................

TRANSIENT WOUNDED WARRIOR LODGING ........................ 62,900 62,900 ..........................

FORT DETRICK: 

CONSOLIDATED LOGISTICS FACILITY .................................. 23,100 23,100 ..........................

INFORMATION SERVICES FACILITY EXPANSION .................. 4,300 4,300 ..........................

NIBC SECURITY FENCING AND EQUIPMENT ....................... 2,700 2,700 ..........................

SUPPLEMENTAL WATER STORAGE ...................................... 3,700 3,700 ..........................

USAMRIID STAGE I, INC 5 .................................................. 17,400 17,400 ..........................

WATER TREATMENT PLANT REPAIR & SUPPLEMENT .......... 11,900 11,900 ..........................

FORT MEADE: 

NORTH CAMPUS UTILITY PLANT ......................................... 219,360 219,360 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

ST. INIGOES (WEBSTER FIELD): 

TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY ........... 5,500 5,500 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

MARTIN STATE AIRPORT: 

REPLACE OPS AND MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY .............. 11,400 11,400 ..........................

TOTAL, MARYLAND ......................................................... 622,009 634,819 ∂12,810 
89 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

MASSACHUSETTS 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

HANSCOM AFB: 

MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC ADDITION ..................................... 2,900 2,900 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

HANSCOM AFB: 

ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER [JFHQ] PH 2 ............... 23,000 23,000 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

BARNES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT: 

ADDITIONS AND RENOVATIONS TO BUILDING 15 ............... .......................... 6,000 ∂6,000 

ARMY RESERVE: 

DEVENS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA: 

AUTOMATED RECORD FIRE RANGE .................................... 4,700 4,700 ..........................

TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS ............................................... 30,600 36,600 ∂6,000 

MICHIGAN 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAMP GRAYLING RANGE: 

BARRACKS REPLACEMENT, PH 2 ....................................... .......................... 17,102 ∂17,102 

COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ............ 19,000 19,000 ..........................

LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE ................................................. .......................... 1,595 ∂1,595 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

ALPENA COMBAT READINESS TRAINING CENTER: 

REPLACE TROOP QUARTERS .............................................. .......................... 9,600 ∂9,600 

TOTAL, MICHIGAN ........................................................... 19,000 47,297 ∂28,297 

MINNESOTA 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

ARDEN HILLS: 

FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................ 29,000 29,000 ..........................

CAMP RIPLEY: 

INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE .................................... 4,300 4,300 ..........................

TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY ........... 4,450 4,450 ..........................

TOTAL, MINNESOTA ........................................................ 37,750 37,750 ..........................

MISSISSIPPI 

NAVY: 

NCBC GULFPORT: 

BRANCH HEALTH CLINIC .................................................... .......................... 11,870 ∂11,870 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

STENNIS SPACE CENTER: 

SOF WESTERN MANEUVER AREA, PH 2 ............................. .......................... 9,000 ∂9,000 

SOF WESTERN MANEUVER AREA, PH 3 ............................. .......................... 8,000 ∂8,000 

TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI ........................................................ .......................... 28,870 ∂28,870 

MISSOURI 

ARMY: 

FORT LEONARD WOOD: 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 29,000 29,000 ..........................

BRIGADE HEADQUARTERS .................................................. 12,200 12,200 ..........................

GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING ..................................... 7,000 7,000 ..........................

INFORMATION SYSTEMS FACILITY ...................................... 15,500 15,500 ..........................

TRAINING BARRACKS .......................................................... 19,000 19,000 ..........................

TRANSIENT ADVANCED TRAINEE BARRACKS, PH 2 ............ 29,000 29,000 ..........................
90 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

FORT LEONARD WOOD: 

REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, PH 1 ............................... .......................... 13,800 ∂13,800 

ARMY RESERVE: 

KANSAS CITY: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER .................................................... 11,800 11,800 ..........................

TOTAL, MISSOURI ........................................................... 123,500 137,300 ∂13,800 

MONTANA 

AIR FORCE: 

MALMSTROM AFB: 

PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER, PH 2 ..................................... .......................... 8,000 ∂8,000 

TOTAL, MONTANA ........................................................... .......................... 8,000 ∂8,000 

NEBRASKA 

AIR FORCE: 

OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE: 

KENNEY/BELLEVUE GATES .................................................. .......................... 11,000 ∂11,000 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

LINCOLN: 

READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ............................................ 3,300 3,300 ..........................

MEAD: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 11,400 11,400 ..........................

TOTAL, NEBRASKA .......................................................... 14,700 25,700 ∂11,000 

NEVADA 

AIR FORCE: 

CREECH AFB: 

UAS AIRFIELD FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION .................... 11,710 11,710 ..........................

NELLIS AFB: 

COMMUNICATION NETWORK CONTROL CENTER ................. .......................... 11,400 ∂11,400 

F–35 ADAL 422 TEST EVALUATION SQUADRON FACILITY .. 7,870 7,870 ..........................

F–35 ADAL FLIGHT TEST INSTRUMENTATION FACILITY ...... 1,900 1,900 ..........................

F–35 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY .................................... 13,110 13,110 ..........................

F–35 MAINTENANCE HANGAR/AMU .................................... 28,760 28,760 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

LAS VEGAS ARNG: 

FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................ .......................... 22,998 ∂22,998 

TOTAL, NEVADA .............................................................. 63,350 97,748 ∂34,398 

NEW HAMPSHIRE 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

PEMBROKE: 

BARRACKS FACILITY (REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE) ...... 15,000 15,000 ..........................

CLASSROOM FACILITY (REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE) ... 21,000 21,000 ..........................

TOTAL, NEW HAMPSHIRE ............................................... 36,000 36,000 ..........................

NEW JERSEY 

AIR FORCE: 

MCGUIRE AFB: 

BASE OPS/COMMAND POST FACILITY [TFI] ........................ 8,000 8,000 ..........................

DORMITORY (120 RM) ........................................................ 18,440 18,440 ..........................
91 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

ATLANTIC CITY IAP: 

FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE DOCK AND CORROSION CONTROL .............................................................................. .......................... 8,500 ∂8,500 

TOTAL, NEW JERSEY .................................................. 26,440 34,940 ∂8,500 

NEW MEXICO 

ARMY: 

WHITE SANDS: 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 29,000 29,000 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

CANNON AFB: 

DORMITORY (96 RM) .......................................................... 14,000 14,000 ..........................

FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER .................................................. .......................... 4,050 ∂4,050 

UAS SQUADRON OPS FACILITY ........................................... 20,000 20,000 ..........................

HOLLOMAN AFB: 

UAS ADD/ALTER MAINTENANCE HANGAR ........................... 15,470 15,470 ..........................

UAS MAINTENANCE HANGAR .............................................. 22,500 22,500 ..........................

KIRTLAND AFB: 

AERIAL DELIVERY FACILITY ADDITION ................................ 3,800 3,800 ..........................

ARMAMENT SHOP ............................................................... 6,460 6,460 ..........................

H/MC–130 FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............ 14,142 14,142 ..........................

MILITARY WORKING DOG FACILITY ..................................... .......................... 4,400 ∂4,400 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CANNON AFB: 

SOF ADD/ALT SIMULATOR FACILITY FOR MC–130 ............. 13,287 13,287 ..........................

SOF AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON (MC–130J) ...................... 12,636 12,636 ..........................

SOF C–130 PARKING APRON PHASE I ............................... 26,006 26,006 ..........................

SOF HANGAR/AMU (MC–130J) ............................................ 24,622 24,622 ..........................

SOF OPERATIONS AND TRAINING COMPLEX ....................... 39,674 39,674 ..........................

WHITE SANDS: 

HEALTH AND DENTAL CLINICS ........................................... 22,900 22,900 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

FARMINGTON: 

READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ............................................ 8,500 8,500 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

LAS CRUCES: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 11,400 11,400 ..........................

TOTAL, NEW MEXICO ...................................................... 284,397 292,847 ∂8,450 

NEW YORK 

ARMY: 

FORT DRUM: 

AIRCRAFT FUEL STORAGE COMPLEX .................................. 14,600 14,600 ..........................

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ..................................... 16,500 16,500 ..........................

BATTALION COMPLEX ......................................................... 61,000 61,000 ..........................

BRIGADE COMPLEX PH 1 ................................................... 55,000 55,000 ..........................

CONSTRUCT RAILHEAD LOADING AREA .............................. .......................... 7,600 ∂7,600 

INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE .................................... 8,200 8,200 ..........................

TRAINING AIDS CENTER ..................................................... 18,500 18,500 ..........................

TRANSIENT TRAINING BARRACKS ....................................... 55,000 55,000 ..........................

U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY: 

SCIENCE FACILITY, PH 2 .................................................... 130,624 130,624 ..........................

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .................................................. 1,700 1,700 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

FORT DRUM: 

20TH AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON COMPLEX ... 20,440 20,440 ..........................
92 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY: 

WEST POINT MS ADD/ALT ................................................... 27,960 27,960 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

FORT DRUM: 

TFI—REAPER INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ........................ 2,500 2,500 ..........................

STEWART IAP: 

BASE DEFENSE GROUP BEDDOWN ..................................... 14,250 14,250 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

BINGHAMTON: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 13,400 13,400 ..........................

TOTAL, NEW YORK ......................................................... 439,674 447,274 ∂7,600 

NORTH CAROLINA 

ARMY: 

FORT BRAGG: 

BATTALION COMPLEX ......................................................... 33,000 33,000 ..........................

BRIGADE COMPLEX ............................................................ 50,000 50,000 ..........................

BRIGADE COMPLEX ............................................................ 25,000 25,000 ..........................

BRIGADE COMPLEX ............................................................ 41,000 41,000 ..........................

COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY ................................... 53,000 53,000 ..........................

COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES .................................... 12,600 12,600 ..........................

DINING FACILITY ................................................................. 11,200 11,200 ..........................

MURCHISON ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION ............... 17,000 17,000 ..........................

STAGING AREA COMPLEX ................................................... 14,600 14,600 ..........................

STUDENT BARRACKS .......................................................... 18,000 18,000 ..........................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................ 28,000 28,000 ..........................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................ 7,500 7,500 ..........................

NAVY: 

CAMP LEJEUNE: 

2ND INTEL BN MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX .................... 90,270 90,270 ..........................

ARMORY—II MEF—WALLACE CREEK ................................ 12,280 12,280 ..........................

BEQ—CAMP JOHNSON ....................................................... 46,550 46,550 ..........................

BEQ—COURTHOUSE BAY ................................................... 42,330 42,330 ..........................

BEQ—COURTHOUSE BAY ................................................... 40,780 40,780 ..........................

BEQ—FRENCH CREEK ....................................................... 43,640 43,640 ..........................

BEQ—RIFLE RANGE ........................................................... 55,350 55,350 ..........................

BEQ—WALLACE CREEK ..................................................... 51,660 51,660 ..........................

BEQ—WALLACE CREEK NORTH ......................................... 46,290 46,290 ..........................

EOD ADDITION—2ND MARINE LOGISTICS GROUP ............. 7,420 7,420 ..........................

HANGAR .............................................................................. 73,010 73,010 ..........................

MAINTENANCE HANGAR [HMLA] ......................................... 74,260 74,260 ..........................

MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX—2ND ANGLICO .................. 36,100 36,100 ..........................

MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE ................................... 9,950 9,950 ..........................

MESS HALL—FRENCH CREEK ............................................ 25,960 25,960 ..........................

MESS HALL ADDITION—COURTHOUSE BAY ....................... 2,553 2,553 ..........................

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION/COMM MAINTENANCE FACILITY .................................................................................. 18,470 18,470 ..........................

UTILITY EXPANSION—FRENCH CREEK ............................... 56,050 56,050 ..........................

UTILITY EXPANSION—HADNOT POINT ................................ 56,470 56,470 ..........................

CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: 

BEQ .................................................................................... 42,500 42,500 ..........................

MARINERS BAY LAND ACQUISITION—BOGUE .................... 3,790 3,790 ..........................

MISSILE MAGAZINE ............................................................. 13,420 13,420 ..........................

STATION INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES .............................. 5,800 5,800 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CAMP LEJEUNE: 

TARAWA TERRACE I ES REPLACE SCHOOL ........................ 16,646 16,646 ..........................
93 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

FORT BRAGG: 

MCNAIR ES—REPLACE SCHOOL ........................................ 23,086 23,086 ..........................

MURRAY ES REPLACE SCHOOL .......................................... 22,000 22,000 ..........................

SOF ADMIN/COMPANY OPERATIONS ................................... 10,347 10,347 ..........................

SOF BAFFLE CONTAINMENT FOR RANGE 19C .................... .......................... 7,200 ∂7,200 

SOF C4 FACILITY—JSOC .................................................... 41,000 41,000 ..........................

SOF JOINT INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE FACILITY ..................... 32,000 32,000 ..........................

SOF MEDICAL CLINIC ADDITION ......................................... .......................... 3,889 ∂3,889 

SOF OPERATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ................ 11,000 11,000 ..........................

SOF OPERATIONS ADDITIONS ............................................. 15,795 15,795 ..........................

SOF OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY ................................. 13,465 13,465 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

HIGH POINT: 

READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ............................................ 1,551 1,551 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT: 

UPGRADE ASOS FACILITIES ................................................ 2,000 2,000 ..........................

TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA .............................................. 1,354,693 1,365,782 ∂11,089 

NORTH DAKOTA 

AIR FORCE: 

GRAND FORKS AFB: 

CENTRAL DEPLOYMENT CENTER ........................................ .......................... 16,500 ∂16,500 

MINOT AFB: 

CONTROL TOWER/BASE OPERATIONS FACILITY .................. 18,770 18,770 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAMP GRAFTON: 

READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ............................................ 11,200 11,200 ..........................

TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA .................................................. 29,970 46,470 ∂16,500 

OHIO 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

COLUMBUS: 

REPLACE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY .................................... 7,400 7,400 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

TOLEDO AIRPORT: 

REPLACE SECURITY FORCES COMPLEX ............................. .......................... 7,300 ∂7,300 

TOTAL, OHIO ................................................................... 7,400 14,700 ∂7,300 

OKLAHOMA 

ARMY: 

FORT SILL: 

GENERAL PURPOSE STORAGE BUILDING ............................ 13,800 13,800 ..........................

MUSEUM OPERATIONS SUPPORT BUILDING ....................... 12,800 .......................... −12,800 

MCALESTER: 

IGLOO STORAGE, DEPOT LEVEL .......................................... 3,000 3,000 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

TINKER AFB: 

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER ........................................... .......................... 9,300 ∂9,300 

UPGRADE BUILDING 3001 INFRASTRUCTURE, PH III ......... 14,000 14,000 ..........................

TOTAL, OKLAHOMA ......................................................... 43,600 40,100 −3,500 
94 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

OREGON 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

KINGSLEY FIELD ANG BASE, KLAMATH FALLS: 

REPLACE FIRE STATION ...................................................... .......................... 7,000 ∂7,000 

TOTAL, OREGON ............................................................. .......................... 7,000 ∂7,000 

PENNSYLVANIA 

NAVY: 

NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MECHANICSBURG (PHILADELPHIA 

ANNEX): 

NORTH GATE SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS ........................... .......................... 5,930 ∂5,930 

QUIET PROPULSION LOAD HOUSE ...................................... .......................... 7,630 ∂7,630 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

NEW CUMBERLAND: 

REPLACE HEADQUARTERS FACILITY ................................... 96,000 96,000 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

STATE COLLEGE ANGS: 

ADD/ALT AOS FACILITY ....................................................... 4,100 4,100 ..........................

TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA ................................................... 100,100 113,660 ∂13,560 

RHODE ISLAND 

NAVY: 

NEWPORT: 

ELECTROMAGNETIC SENSOR FACILITY ............................... 27,007 27,007 ..........................

GATE IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................ .......................... 4,950 ∂4,950 

SUBMARINE PAYLOADS INTEGRATION LABORATORY .......... .......................... 12,170 ∂12,170 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

EAST GREENWICH: 

UNITED STATES PROPERTY AND FISCAL OFFICE ................ 27,000 27,000 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

QUONSET STATE AIRPORT: 

C–130 PARKING APRON ..................................................... .......................... 1,800 ∂1,800 

TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND ................................................... 54,007 72,927 ∂18,920 

SOUTH CAROLINA 

ARMY: 

FORT JACKSON: 

TRAINEE BARRACKS ........................................................... 28,000 28,000 ..........................

TRAINEE BARRACKS COMPLEX, PH 1 ................................ 46,000 46,000 ..........................

TRAINING AIDS CENTER ..................................................... 17,000 17,000 ..........................

NAVY: 

BEAUFORT: 

AICUZ LAND ACQUISITION .................................................. 21,190 21,190 ..........................

AIRCRAFT HANGAR—VMFAT—502 .................................... 46,550 46,550 ..........................

PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER ............................................... 15,430 15,430 ..........................

TRAINING AND SIMULATOR FACILITY .................................. 46,240 46,240 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

CHARLESTON AFB: 

CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLEX [TFI]—PHASE 1 ...................... 15,000 15,000 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

MCENTIRE JRB: 

JOINT DEPLOYMENT PROCESSING AND READINESS CENTER ................................................................................ .......................... 9,100 ∂9,100 

TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA .......................................... 235,410 244,510 ∂9,100 
95 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

SOUTH DAKOTA 

AIR FORCE: 

ELLSWORTH AFB: 

MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY ..................................... .......................... 12,400 ∂12,400 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

JOE FOSS FIELD: 

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SHOPS ........................................ .......................... 12,800 ∂12,800 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

WATERTOWN: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 25,000 25,000 ..........................

TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA .................................................. 25,000 50,200 ∂25,200 

TENNESSEE 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

MCGHEE TYSON ANG BASE: 

HOBBS ROAD ACQUISITION ................................................ .......................... 6,500 ∂6,500 

NASHVILLE IAP: 

TFI—RENOVATE INTEL SQUADRON FACILITIES .................. 5,500 5,500 ..........................

TOTAL, TENNESSEE ........................................................ 5,500 12,000 ∂6,500 

TEXAS 

ARMY: 

FORT BLISS: 

AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE .......... 6,700 6,700 ..........................

COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES .................................... 18,500 18,500 ..........................

DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE ......................... 22,000 22,000 ..........................

HEAVY SNIPER RANGE ....................................................... 3,500 3,500 ..........................

INDOOR SWIMMING POOL ................................................... 15,500 15,500 ..........................

LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE ................................................. 2,100 2,100 ..........................

LIVE FIRE EXERCISE SHOOTHOUSE .................................... 3,150 3,150 ..........................

SCOUT/RECCE GUNNERY COMPLEX ................................... 15,500 15,500 ..........................

SQUAD DEFENSE RANGE .................................................... 3,000 3,000 ..........................

THAAD BATTERY COMPLEX ................................................. 17,500 17,500 ..........................

TRANSIENT TRAINING COMPLEX ......................................... 31,000 31,000 ..........................

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .................................................. 2,800 2,800 ..........................

VEHICLE BRIDGE OVERPASS .............................................. 8,700 8,700 ..........................

FORT HOOD: 

BATTALION COMPLEX ......................................................... 40,000 40,000 ..........................

BRIGADE COMPLEX ............................................................ 38,000 38,000 ..........................

COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES .................................... 4,300 4,300 ..........................

CONVOY LIVE FIRE ............................................................. 3,200 3,200 ..........................

LIVE FIRE EXERCISE SHOOTHOUSE .................................... 2,100 2,100 ..........................

UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM [UAS] HANGAR ...................... 55,000 55,000 ..........................

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .................................................. 2,450 2,450 ..........................

FORT SAM HOUSTON: 

SIMULATIONS CENTER ........................................................ 16,000 16,000 ..........................

TRAINING AIDS CENTER ..................................................... 6,200 6,200 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

DYESS AFB: 

C–130J ADD/ALTER FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ............. 4,080 4,080 ..........................

ELLINGTON FIELD: 

TFI—UPGRADE UAV MAINTENANCE HANGAR ..................... 7,000 7,000 ..........................

LACKLAND AFB: 

BMT SATELLITE CLASSROOM/DINING FACILITY NO. 2 ........ 32,000 32,000 ..........................

ONE-COMPANY FIRE STATION ............................................ 5,500 5,500 ..........................

RECRUIT DORMITORY, PHASE 3 ......................................... 67,980 67,980 ..........................

RECRUIT/FAMILY INPROCESSING & INFO CENTER ............. 21,800 21,800 ..........................
96 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

RANDOLPH AFB: 

FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION ........................................... .......................... 13,000 ∂13,000 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

FORT BLISS: 

HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT INCR 2 ....................................... 147,100 147,100 ..........................

LACKLAND AFB: 

AMBULATORY CARE CENTER PHASE 2 INC 1 .................... 162,500 120,000 −42,500 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAMP MAXEY: 

COMBAT PISTOL/MILITARY PISTOL QUALIFICATION C ......... 2,500 2,500 ..........................

CAMP SWIFT: 

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .................................................. 2,600 2,600 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

DALLAS: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 12,600 12,600 ..........................

FORT HOOD: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER .................................................... .......................... 15,500 ∂15,500 

RIO GRANDE: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 6,100 6,100 ..........................

SAN MARCOS: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 8,500 8,500 ..........................

TOTAL, TEXAS ................................................................. 797,460 783,460 −14,000 

UTAH 

AIR FORCE: 

HILL AFB: 

CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, PH 1 ......... .......................... 7,300 ∂7,300 

F–22 T–10 ENGINE TEST CELL .......................................... 2,800 2,800 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CAMP WILLIAMS: 

CNCI DATA CENTER INCREMENT 3 .................................... 398,358 398,358 ..........................

TOTAL, UTAH .................................................................. 401,158 408,458 ∂7,300 

VERMONT 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: 

UPGRADE TAXIWAYS AND REPLACE ARM/DISARM PADS, 

PH 1 ............................................................................... .......................... 11,000 ∂11,000 

TOTAL, VERMONT ....................................................... .......................... 11,000 ∂11,000 

VIRGINIA 

ARMY: 

FORT A.P. HILL: 

1200 METER RANGE .......................................................... 14,500 14,500 ..........................

INDOOR FIRING RANGE ...................................................... 6,200 6,200 ..........................

KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE .................................................. 3,800 3,800 ..........................

LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE ................................................. 4,100 4,100 ..........................

MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY .............................. 65,000 65,000 ..........................

FORT EUSTIS: 

WARRIOR IN TRANSITION COMPLEX ................................... 18,000 18,000 ..........................

FORT LEE: 

AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE .................. 7,700 7,700 ..........................

COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITY ....................................... 4,900 4,900 ..........................

MUSEUM OPERATIONS SUPPORT BUILDING ....................... 30,000 .......................... −30,000 

TRAINING AIDS CENTER ..................................................... 5,800 5,800 ..........................
97 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

NAVY: 

DAHLGREN NSCW: 

MISSILE SUPPORT FACILITY REPLACEMENT, PH 1 ............. .......................... 9,730 ∂9,730 

NORFOLK: 

PIER 1 UPGRADES TO BERTH USNS COMFORT ................. 10,035 10,035 ..........................

PIERS 9 AND 10 UPGRADES FOR DDG 1000 ..................... 2,400 2,400 ..........................

PORTSMOUTH: 

SHIP REPAIR PIER REPLACEMENT, INCR 2 ........................ 100,000 100,000 ..........................

QUANTICO: 

ACADEMIC FACILITY ADDITION—SNCOA ............................ 12,080 12,080 ..........................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS—WTBN .......................... 37,810 37,810 ..........................

RESEARCH CENTER ADDITION—MCU ................................ 37,920 37,920 ..........................

STUDENT OFFICER QUARTERS—TBS ................................. 55,822 55,822 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

LANGLEY AFB: 

F–22 ADD/ALTER HANGAR BAY LO/CR FACILITY—TFI ...... 8,800 8,800 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CRANEY ISLAND: 

REPLACE FUEL PIER ........................................................... 58,000 58,000 ..........................

FORT BELVOIR: 

DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT .......................................... 6,300 6,300 ..........................

PENTAGON: 

PENTAGON METRO AND CORRIDOR 8 SCREENING FACILITY .................................................................................. 6,473 6,473 ..........................

POWER PLANT MODERNIZATION PHASE 3 .......................... 51,928 51,928 ..........................

SECURE ACCESS LANE—REMOTE VEHICLE SCREENING ... 4,923 4,923 ..........................

QUANTICO: 

NEW CONSOLIDATED ELEMETARY SCHOOL ........................ 47,355 47,355 ..........................

ARMY RESERVE: 

FORT A.P. HILL: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER .................................................... 15,500 15,500 ..........................

ROANOKE: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................... 14,800 14,800 ..........................

VIRGINIA BEACH: 

ARMY RESERVE CENTER .................................................... 11,000 11,000 ..........................

NAVY RESERVE: 

WILLIAMSBURG: 

NAVY ORDNANCE CARGO LOGISTICS TRAINING COMPLEX ............................................................................... 21,346 21,346 ..........................

TOTAL, VIRGINIA ........................................................ 662,492 642,222 −20,270 

WASHINGTON 

ARMY: 

FORT LEWIS: 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 47,000 47,000 ..........................

BARRACKS COMPLEX ......................................................... 40,000 40,000 ..........................

RAPPELLING TRAINING AREA .............................................. 5,300 5,300 ..........................

REGIONAL LOGISTIC SPT COMPLEX WAREHOUSE .............. 16,500 16,500 ..........................

REGIONAL LOGISTIC SUPPORT COMPLEX ........................... 63,000 63,000 ..........................

YAKIMA: 

SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE ................................................ 3,750 3,750 ..........................

NAVY: 

BANGOR: 

CSDS–5 LABORATORY EXPANSION PHASE 1 ..................... 16,170 16,170 ..........................

LIMITED AREA EMERGENCY POWER ................................... 15,810 15,810 ..........................

WATERFRONT RESTRICTED AREA EMERGENCY POWER ..... 24,913 24,913 ..........................

BREMERTON: 

LIMITED AREA PRODUCT/STRG CMPLX, INCR 7 ................. 19,116 19,116 ..........................
98 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

AIR FORCE: 

FAIRCHILD AFB: 

PRECISION MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT LABORATORY FACILITY ............................................................................. .......................... 4,850 ∂4,850 

MCCHORD AFB: 

COLLOCATED CHAPEL/FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER, PH 1 .... .......................... 10,400 ∂10,400 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

FORT LEWIS: 

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE FACILITY ........................................ 8,400 8,400 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

TACOMA: 

COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ........................ 25,000 25,000 ..........................

NAVY RESERVE: 

YAKIMA: 

MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER .................................... 13,844 13,844 ..........................

TOTAL, WASHINGTON ...................................................... 298,803 314,053 ∂15,250 

WEST VIRGINIA 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

MOOREFIELD: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 14,200 14,200 ..........................

MORGANTOWN: 

READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 21,000 21,000 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

YEAGER AIRBASE: 

COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING FACILITY ............................... .......................... 6,250 ∂6,250 

FORCE PROTECTION/ANTITERRORISM ................................ .......................... 13,000 ∂13,000 

TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA ................................................... 35,200 54,450 ∂19,250 

WISCONSIN 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

MADISON: 

AIRCRAFT PARKING ............................................................ 5,700 5,700 ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

GENERAL MITCHELL IAP: 

REPLACE FIRE STATION ...................................................... .......................... 8,300 ∂8,300 

ARMY RESERVE: 

FORT MCCOY: 

AT/MOB BILLETING COMPLEX PHASE I .............................. 9,800 9,800 ..........................

NCO ACADEMY PHASE II .................................................... 10,000 10,000 ..........................

TOTAL, WISCONSIN ......................................................... 25,500 33,800 ∂8,300 

WYOMING 

AIR FORCE: 

CAMP GUERNSEY: 

NUCLEAR/SPACE SECURITY TACTICS TRAINING CENTER ... 4,650 4,650 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

LARAMIE: 

FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................ 14,400 14,400 ..........................

TOTAL, WYOMING ........................................................... 19,050 19,050 ..........................

AFGHANISTAN 

ARMY: 

BAGRAM AIR BASE: 

ARMY AVIATION HQ FACILITIES .......................................... 19,000 .......................... −19,000 
99 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 18,000 .......................... −18,000 

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY SUPPORT AREA .................... 14,800 .......................... −14,800 

EASTSIDE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION ................................ 10,400 .......................... −10,400 

EASTSIDE UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE .............................. 29,000 .......................... −29,000 

ENTRY CONTROL POINT ...................................................... 7,500 .......................... −7,500 

JOINT DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER ............................... 2,800 .......................... −2,800 

AIR FORCE: 

BAGRAM AIR BASE: 

CONSOLIDATED RIGGING FACILITY ..................................... 9,900 .......................... −9,900 

FIGHTER HANGAR ............................................................... 16,480 .......................... −16,480 

MEDEVAC RAMP EXPANSION/FIRE STATION ....................... 16,580 .......................... −16,580 

TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN ..................................................... 144,460 .......................... −144,460 

BAHRAIN ISLAND 

NAVY: 

BAHRAIN NSA: 

NAVCENT AMMUNITION MAGAZINES ................................... 89,280 89,280 ..........................

OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT FACILITIES ............................. 60,002 60,002 ..........................

WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, PHASE 3 ............................. 63,871 63,871 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

SHAIKH ISA AB: 

NORTH APRON EXPANSION ................................................. 45,000 45,000 ..........................

TOTAL, BAHRAIN ISLAND ................................................ 258,153 258,153 ..........................

BELGIUM 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

BRUSSELS: 

NATO HEADQUARTERS FACILITY ......................................... 31,863 31,863 ..........................

REPLACE SHAPE MS/HS ..................................................... 67,311 67,311 ..........................

TOTAL, BELGIUM ............................................................ 99,174 99,174 ..........................

DJIBOUTI 

NAVY: 

CAMP LEMONIER: 

CAMP LEMONIER HQ FACILITY ........................................... 12,407 12,407 ..........................

GENERAL WAREHOUSE ....................................................... 7,324 7,324 ..........................

HORN OF AFRICA JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER/HQ ............. 28,076 .......................... −28,076 

PAVE EXTERNAL ROADS ..................................................... 3,824 3,824 ..........................

TOTAL, DJIBOUTI ............................................................ 51,631 23,555 −28,076 

GERMANY 

ARMY: 

ANSBACH: 

PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER ............................................... 13,800 13,800 ..........................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................ 18,000 18,000 ..........................

GRAFENWOEHR: 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 17,500 17,500 ..........................

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 19,000 19,000 ..........................

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 20,000 20,000 ..........................

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 19,000 19,000 ..........................

RHINE ORDNANCE BARRACKS: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX ......................................................... 35,000 35,000 ..........................

SEMBACH AB: 

CONFINEMENT FACILITY ..................................................... 9,100 9,100 ..........................

WIESBADEN AB: 

COMMAND AND BATTLE CENTER, INCR 2 .......................... 59,500 59,500 ..........................
100 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

CONSTRUCT NEW ACP ........................................................ 5,100 5,100 ..........................

INFORMATION PROCESSING CENTER .................................. 30,400 30,400 ..........................

SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION FACILITY ....... 91,000 45,500 −45,500 

AIR FORCE: 

KAPAUN: 

DORMITORY (128 RM) ........................................................ 19,600 19,600 ..........................

RAMSTEIN AB: 

CONSTRUCT C–130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ............ 8,800 8,800 ..........................

DEICING FLUID STORAGE & DISPENSING FACILITY ............ 2,754 2,754 ..........................

UAS SATCOM RELAY PADS & FACILITY .............................. 10,800 10,800 ..........................

VILSECK: 

AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON [ASOS] COMPLEX ............................................................................... 12,900 12,900 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

KATTERBACH: 

HEALTH/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT ............................. 37,100 37,100 ..........................

PANZER KASERNE: 

REPLACE BOEBLINGEN HS ................................................. 48,968 48,968 ..........................

VILSECK: 

HEALTH CLINIC ADD/ALT .................................................... 34,800 34,800 ..........................

TOTAL, GERMANY ........................................................... 513,122 467,622 −45,500 

GUAM 

NAVY: 

GUAM: 

AAFB NORTH RAMP PARKING (PHASE 1, INC 2) ................ 93,588 .......................... −93,588 

AAFB NORTH RAMP UTILITIES (PHASE 1, INC 2) ............... 79,350 .......................... −79,350 

APRA HARBOR WHARVES IMP (PHASE 1, INC) .................. 40,000 40,000 ..........................

DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS .......................... 66,730 66,730 ..........................

FINEGAYAN SITE PREP AND UTILITIES ............................... 147,210 .......................... −147,210 

AIR FORCE: 

ANDERSEN AFB: 

GUAM STRIKE OPS GROUP & TANKER TASK FORCE: 

RENOVATION .............................................................. 9,100 9,100 ..........................

GUAM STRIKE SOUTH RAMP UTILITIES, PHASE 1 .............. 12,200 12,200 ..........................

PRTC—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS FACILITY .................................................................................. 9,200 9,200 ..........................

PRTC—RED HORSE HEADQUARTERS/ENGINEERING FACILITY .................................................................................. 8,000 8,000 ..........................

PRTC—COMMANDO WARRIOR OPEN BAY STUDENT BARRACKS ............................................................................ 11,800 11,800 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

AGANA NAVAL AIR STATION: 

HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT, INCR 2 ...................................... 70,000 70,000 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

BARRIGADA: 

COMBINED SUPPORT MAINT SHOP PH 1 ........................... 19,000 19,000 ..........................

TOTAL, GUAM ................................................................. 566,178 246,030 −320,148 

HONDURAS 

ARMY: 

SOTO CANO AB: 

BARRACKS .......................................................................... 20,400 .......................... −20,400 

TOTAL, HONDURAS ......................................................... 20,400 .......................... −20,400 
101 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

ITALY 

ARMY: 

VICENZA: 

BDE COMPLEX—BARRACKS/COMMUNITY, INCR 4 ............ 26,000 26,000 ..........................

BDE COMPLEX—OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY, 

INCR 4 ........................................................................... 25,000 25,000 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

AVIANO AB: 

AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON [ASOS] FACILITY .. 10,200 10,200 ..........................

DORMITORY (144 RM) ........................................................ 19,000 19,000 ..........................

TOTAL, ITALY .................................................................. 80,200 80,200 ..........................

JAPAN 

NAVY: 

ATSUGI: 

MH–60R/S TRAINER FACILITY ............................................ 6,908 6,908 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

KADENA AB: 

INSTALL FUEL FILTERS–SEPARATORS ................................ 3,000 3,000 ..........................

MISAWA AB: 

HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ..................................................... 31,000 .......................... −31,000 

TOTAL, JAPAN ................................................................. 40,908 9,908 −31,000 

KOREA 

ARMY: 

CAMP WALKER: 

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UPGRADE & NATURAL GAS SYSTEM ................................................................................ 19,500 19,500 ..........................

AIR FORCE: 

KUNSAN AB: 

DMT FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ..................................... 7,500 7,500 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CAMP CARROLL: 

HEALTH/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT ............................. 19,500 .......................... −19,500 

TOTAL, KOREA ................................................................ 46,500 27,000 −19,500 

PUERTO RICO 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

FORT BUCHANAN: 

ANTILLES ES/IS—REPLACE SCHOOL .................................. 58,708 58,708 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAMP SANTIAGO: 

LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE ................................................... 3,100 3,100 ..........................

MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE .............................. 9,200 9,200 ..........................

TOTAL, PUERTO RICO ..................................................... 71,008 71,008 ..........................

QATAR 

AIR FORCE: 

AL UDEID: 

BLATCHFORD-PRESTON COMPLEX PH III ........................... 62,300 62,300 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

AL UDEID: 

NSA WAREHOUSE ............................................................... 1,961 1,961 ..........................

TOTAL, QATAR ................................................................ 64,261 64,261 ..........................
102 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

SPAIN 

NAVY: 

ROTA: 

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER ........................................... 23,190 23,190 ..........................

TOTAL, SPAIN ................................................................. 23,190 23,190 ..........................

UNITED KINGDOM 

AIR FORCE: 

RAF MILDENHALL: 

EXTEND TAXIWAY ALPHA .................................................... 15,000 15,000 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

MENWITH HILL STATION: 

MHS PSC CONSTRUCTION—GENERATORS 10 & 11 .......... 2,000 2,000 ..........................

RAF MILDENHALL: 

REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM .............. 15,900 15,900 ..........................

RAF ALCONBURY: 

ALCONBURY ES REPLACEMENT .......................................... 30,308 30,308 ..........................

TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM ............................................... 63,208 63,208 ..........................

VIRGIN ISLANDS 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

ST. CROIX: 

READINESS CENTER [JFHQ] ................................................ 25,000 25,000 ..........................

TOTAL, VIRGIN ISLANDS ................................................. 25,000 25,000 ..........................

NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM ............................................. 258,884 258,884 ..........................

WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED 

ARMY: 

HOST NATION SUPPORT ............................................................... 28,000 28,000 ..........................

PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................... 221,636 230,308 ∂8,672 

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 23,000 25,051 ∂2,051 

NAVY: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................... 120,050 124,148 ∂4,098 

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 20,877 22,357 ∂1,480 

AIR FORCE: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................... 66,336 77,182 ∂10,846 

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 18,000 22,717 ∂4,717 

F–35 ACADEMIC TRAINING CENTER ............................................ 54,150 54,150 ..........................

F–35 SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY ..................................... 10,260 10,260 ..........................

F–35 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ............................................. 12,190 12,190 ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION ................................................... 10,000 10,000 ..........................

ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM ....................... 120,000 290,000 ∂170,000 

PLANNING AND DESIGN: 

DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES ............................................... 54,221 54,221 ..........................

DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE ............................................. 1,988 1,988 ..........................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENT EDUCATION ......... 79,763 79,763 ..........................

ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM .............. .......................... 10,000 ∂10,000 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY ............................................ 28,239 28,239 ..........................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ....................................... 30,836 35,686 ∂4,850 

TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY ....................................... 230,300 230,300 ..........................

WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICE ............................ 6,270 6,270 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................... 431,617 446,467 ∂14,850 
103 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION: 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ............................................. 5,258 5,258 ..........................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENT EDUCATION ......... 13,841 13,841 ..........................

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ..................................................... 8,210 8,210 ..........................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ....................................... 7,663 7,663 ..........................

TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY ....................................... 4,884 4,884 ..........................

DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES ............................................... 3,000 3,000 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ......... 42,856 42,856 ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................... 25,663 35,876 ∂10,213 

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 11,400 28,229 ∂16,829 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................... 9,214 22,732 ∂13,518 

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 8,000 10,000 ∂2,000 

ARMY RESERVE: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................... 25,900 26,941 ∂1,041 

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 3,000 3,000 ..........................

NAVY RESERVE: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................... 1,857 1,857 ..........................

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 2,238 2,238 ..........................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................... 1,653 1,653 ..........................

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................................... 2,759 7,759 ∂5,000 

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY 

ALASKA: 

FORT WAINWRIGHT: 

FAMILY HOUSING REPLACEMENT (110 UNITS) ................... 21,000 21,000 ..........................

GERMANY: 

BAUMHOLDER: 

FAMILY HOUSING REPLACEMENT (64 UNITS) ..................... 34,329 34,329 ..........................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................... 35,000 35,000 ..........................

PLANNING AND DESIGN ........................................................................ 2,040 2,040 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION .................................................... 92,369 92,369 ..........................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: 

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 69,655 69,655 ..........................

SERVICES ACCOUNT .................................................................... 15,372 15,372 ..........................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ............................................................. 49,222 49,222 ..........................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ......................................................... 1,201 1,201 ..........................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .............................................................. 31,548 31,548 ..........................

LEASING ....................................................................................... 203,184 203,184 ..........................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ............................................ 120,899 120,899 ..........................

PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ................................................. 27,059 27,059 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ........................... 518,140 518,140 ..........................

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS 

GUANTANAMO: 

NAVAL STATION GUANTANAMO: 

REPLACE GTMO HOUSING (71 UNITS) ................................ 37,169 37,169 ..........................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................... 146,020 146,020 ..........................

PLANNING AND DESIGN ........................................................................ 3,255 3,255 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION .................................................... 186,444 186,444 ..........................
104 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee recommendation 

Committee recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: 

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 59,919 59,919 ..........................

SERVICES ACCOUNT .................................................................... 16,790 16,790 ..........................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ............................................................. 63,551 63,551 ..........................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ......................................................... 464 464 ..........................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .............................................................. 14,478 14,478 ..........................

LEASING ....................................................................................... 97,484 97,484 ..........................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ............................................ 87,134 87,134 ..........................

PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ................................................. 26,526 26,526 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ........................... 366,346 366,346 ..........................

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE 

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................... 73,800 73,800 ..........................

PLANNING AND DESIGN ........................................................................ 4,225 4,225 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION .................................................... 78,025 78,025 ..........................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: 

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 89,245 89,245 ..........................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ............................................................. 54,633 54,633 ..........................

SERVICES ACCOUNT .................................................................... 21,535 21,535 ..........................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .............................................................. 35,399 35,399 ..........................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ......................................................... 1,710 1,710 ..........................

LEASING ....................................................................................... 95,671 95,671 ..........................

MAINTENANCE ............................................................................. 161,696 161,696 ..........................

PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ................................................. 53,903 53,903 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ........................... 513,792 513,792 ..........................

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY: 

UTILITIES ............................................................................ 10 10 ..........................

FURNISHINGS ...................................................................... 50 50 ..........................

LEASING .............................................................................. 10,293 10,293 ..........................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ................................... 70 70 ..........................

DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY: 

FURNISHINGS ...................................................................... 4,501 4,501 ..........................

LEASING .............................................................................. 34,124 34,124 ..........................

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY: 

UTILITIES ............................................................................ 297 297 ..........................

FURNISHINGS ...................................................................... 18 18 ..........................

SERVICES ........................................................................... 29 29 ..........................

MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 365 365 ..........................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ................................... 707 707 ..........................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .................. 50,464 50,464 ..........................

DOD FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND ....................................... 1,096 1,096 ..........................

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ................................................ 16,515 16,515 ..........................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, 1990 .......................... 360,474 360,474 ..........................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, 2005 .......................... 2,354,285 2,354,285 ..........................

RECAP 

ARMY .................................................................................................... 4,078,798 3,797,521 −281,277 

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ................................................................... 3,879,104 3,667,922 −211,182 
105 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

estimate 

Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

recommendation 

compared with 

budget estimate 

(∂ or −) 

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

AIR FORCE ............................................................................................ 1,311,385 1,378,688 ∂67,303 

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

DEFENSE-WIDE ..................................................................................... 3,118,062 3,241,601 ∂123,539 

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ....................................................................... 873,664 980,072 ∂106,408 

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD .......................................................................... 176,986 337,454 ∂160,468 

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

ARMY RESERVE .................................................................................... 318,175 347,916 ∂29,741 

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

NAVY RESERVE ..................................................................................... 61,557 61,557 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

AIR FORCE RESERVE ............................................................................ 7,832 12,832 ∂5,000 

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

NATO ..................................................................................................... 258,884 258,884 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE .......... 124,971 124,971 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

DOD FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND ....................................... 1,096 1,096 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ................................................ 16,515 16,515 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY ...................................................................... 610,509 610,509 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ..................................... 552,790 552,790 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE .............................................................. 591,817 591,817 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................................ 50,464 50,464 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

BRAC .................................................................................................... 2,714,759 2,714,759 ..........................

RESCISSION ................................................................................. .......................... .......................... ..........................

GRAND TOTAL ......................................................................... 18,747,368 18,747,368 ..........................
106 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget request Committee recommendation 

Committee 

versus request 

AFGHANISTAN 

ARMY: 

AIRBORNE: 

ROTARY WING PARKING ........................................................... 1,200 ........................ ¥1,200 

BAGRAM AIR BASE: 

ARMY AVIATION HQ FACILITIES ................................................ ........................ 19,000 ∂19,000 

BARRACKS ................................................................................ ........................ 18,000 ∂18,000 

COMMAND & CONTROL FACILITY ............................................. 13,600 13,600 ........................

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY SUPPORT AREA .......................... ........................ 14,800 ∂14,800 

DFIP DETAINEE HOUSING ......................................................... 23,000 ........................ ¥23,000 

DINING FACILITY ....................................................................... 2,650 6,000 ∂3,350 

EASTSIDE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION ...................................... ........................ 10,400 ∂10,400 

EASTSIDE UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE .................................... ........................ 29,000 ∂29,000 

ENTRY CONTROL POINT ............................................................ ........................ 7,500 ∂7,500 

JOINT DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER ..................................... ........................ 2,800 ∂2,800 

C–IED TASK FORCE COMPOUND .............................................. 24,000 24,000 ........................

MP HQ ...................................................................................... 2,800 5,580 ∂2,780 

REPLACE TEMPORARY GUARD TOWERS ................................... 5,500 6,000 ∂500 

ROLE III HOSPITAL .................................................................... 35,000 42,000 ∂7,000 

TANKER TRUCK OFF-LOAD FACILITY ......................................... 5,700 ........................ ¥5,700 

TASK FORCE FREEDOM COMPOUND ......................................... 18,000 18,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 4 ............................................................ 23,000 23,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 5 ............................................................ 29,000 29,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 6 ............................................................ 29,000 29,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 7 ............................................................ 29,000 29,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 8 ............................................................ 29,000 29,000 ........................

VET CLINIC & KENNEL ............................................................. 2,600 2,600 ........................

DWYER: 

COMMAND & CONTROL FACILITY ............................................. 5,200 5,200 ........................

DINING FACILITY ....................................................................... 6,000 9,000 ∂3,000 

ROTARY WING APRON .............................................................. 44,000 44,000 ........................

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ......................................... 16,000 16,000 ........................

FRONTENAC: 

WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPLEX .............................................. 4,200 4,200 ........................

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ......................................... 4,200 4,200 ........................

JALALABAD: 

ROTARY WING PARKING ........................................................... 1,100 ........................ ¥1,100 

KANDAHAR: 

NORTH AREA UTILITIES, PH 2 .................................................. 21,000 ........................ ¥21,000 

SOF JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER .............................................. 6,000 6,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 4 ............................................................ 20,000 20,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 5 ............................................................ 20,000 20,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 6 ............................................................ 20,000 20,000 ........................

TROOP HOUSING, PH 7 ............................................................ 20,000 20,000 ........................

MAYWAND: 

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ......................................... 7,000 7,000 ........................

SHANK: 

AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT .................................................... 25,000 23,000 ¥2,000 

EXPAND ECP 1 AND ECP 2 ...................................................... 16,000 9,000 ¥7,000 

GUARD TOWERS ....................................................................... 2,400 2,400 ........................

ROADS AND UTILITIES, PH 1 .................................................... 8,000 25,000 ∂17,000 

SHARANA: 

BULK MATERIALS TRANSFER STATION ..................................... 12,400 12,400 ........................

SHINDAND: 

MEDICAL FACILITY .................................................................... 7,700 ........................ ¥7,700 

TARIN KOWT: 

MEDICAL FACILITY .................................................................... 5,500 ........................ ¥5,500 

ROTARY WING PARKING AND TAXIWAY, PH 2 .......................... 24,000 24,000 ........................

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ......................................... 4,200 4,200 ........................

TOMBSTONE/BASTION: 

CONTINGENCY HOUSING ........................................................... 41,000 41,000 ........................
107 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Budget request Committee 

recommendation 

Committee 

versus request 

DINING FACILITY ....................................................................... 12,800 27,000 ∂14,200 

ROTARY WING PARKING ........................................................... 35,000 35,000 ........................

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ......................................... 13,000 13,000 ........................

WOLVERINE: 

ENTRY CONTROL POINT ............................................................ 5,100 5,100 ........................

PERIMETER FENCE ................................................................... 5,100 5,100 ........................

ROTARY WING APRON .............................................................. 24,000 24,000 ........................

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ......................................... 13,000 13,000 ........................

VARIOUS LOCATIONS: 

ROUTE GYPSUM, PH 1 ............................................................. 40,000 49,000 ∂9,000 

AIR FORCE: 

BAGRAM: 

CONSOLIDATED RIGGING FACILITY ........................................... ........................ 9,900 ∂9,900 

FIGHTER HANGAR ..................................................................... ........................ 16,480 ∂16,480 

MEDEVAC RAMP EXPANSION/FIRE STATION ............................. ........................ 16,580 ∂16,580 

KANDAHAR: 

EXPAND CARGO HANDLING AREA ............................................. 7,100 7,100 ........................

EXPEDITIONARY AIRLIFT SHELTER ............................................ 7,400 7,400 ........................

SHARANA: 

RUNWAY ................................................................................... 35,000 ........................ ¥35,000 

SHINDAND: 

PASSENGER & CARGO TERMINAL ............................................ 15,800 15,800 ........................

TOMBSTONE/BASTION: 

EXPAND FUELS OPERATIONS AND STORAGE ............................ 2,500 2,500 ........................

PARALLEL TAXIWAY .................................................................. 86,000 ........................ ¥86,000 

REFUELER APRON .................................................................... 55,000 ........................ ¥55,000 

WARRIOR: 

RUNWAY ................................................................................... 8,700 ........................ ¥8,700 

WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CLASSIFIED PROJECT [NSA] .............................................................. 41,900 41,900 ........................

WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED 

ARMY: 

MINOR CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................... 78,330 98,330 ∂20,000 

PLANNING & DESIGN ......................................................................... 89,716 101,266 ∂11,550 

AIR FORCE: 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................... 49,584 69,584 ∂20,000 

PLANNING & DESIGN ......................................................................... 13,422 19,482 ∂6,060 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ..................................................................... 4,600 4,600 ........................

GRAND TOTAL ............................................................................... 1,257,002 1,257,002 ........................

RECAP 

ARMY .......................................................................................................... 929,996 1,045,676 ∂115,680 

AIR FORCE .................................................................................................. 280,506 164,826 ¥115,680 

DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................................................................... 46,500 46,500 ........................

GRAND TOTAL ............................................................................... 1,257,002 1,257,002 ........................

DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING 

ITEMS 

The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the purse. 

The Committee believes strongly that Congress should make the 

decisions on how to allocate the people’s money. 
108 

As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the 

term ‘‘congressionally directed spending item’’ means a provision or 

report language included primarily at the request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan, loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, 

or other expenditure with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific 

State, locality or congressional district, other than through a statutory or administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process. 

For each item, a Member is required to provide a certification 

that neither the Member nor the Member’s immediate family has 

a pecuniary interest in such congressionally directed spending 

item. Such certifications are available to the public on the website 

of the Senate Committee on Appropriations 

(www.appropriations.senate.gov/senators.cfm). 

Following is a list of congressionally directed spending items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this report, 

along with the name of each Senator who submitted a request to 

the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so identified. Neither 

the Committee recommendation nor this report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff benefits as defined in rule XLIV. 
109 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION 

Army ............................................................ Alabama: FORT RUCKER—AVIATION COMPONENT MAINTENANCE SHOP .............................................. $29,000 The President, Senator Sessions 

Army ............................................................ Alabama: FORT RUCKER—AVIATION MAINTENANCE FACILITY .............................................................. $36,000 The President, Senator Sessions Army ............................................................ Alabama: FORT RUCKER—TRAINING AIDS CENTER .............................................................................. $4,650 The President, Senator Sessions Navy ............................................................ Alabama: MOBILE—T–6 SOLO CAPABLE OUTLYING LANDING FIELD .................................................... $29,082 The President, Senator Sessions Air Force ...................................................... Alabama: MAXWELL AFB—ADD/ALT AIR UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ............................................................. $13,400 The President, Senator Sessions Air Guard .................................................... Alabama: MONTGOMERY REGIONAL AIRPORT [ANG] BASE—FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL 

HANGAR.

$7,472 The President, Senator Sessions 

Army ............................................................ Alaska: FORT GREELY—FIRE STATION .................................................................................................. $26,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Army ............................................................ Alaska: FORT RICHARDSON—BRIGADE COMPLEX, PH 1 ....................................................................... $67,038 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Army ............................................................ Alaska: FORT RICHARDSON—MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE ................................................... $12,200 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Army ............................................................ Alaska: FORT RICHARDSON—SIMULATIONS CENTER ............................................................................ $34,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Army ............................................................ Alaska: FORT WAINWRIGHT—AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 2A (HANGAR) ............................... $92,650 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Army ............................................................ Alaska: FORT WAINWRIGHT—AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 2B [COF] ..................................... $27,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Army ............................................................ Alaska: FORT WAINWRIGHT—URBAN ASSAULT COURSE ....................................................................... $3,350 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Air Force ...................................................... Alaska: ELMENDORF AFB—ADD/ALTER AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON .................................. $4,749 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Air Force ...................................................... Alaska: ELMENDORF AFB—CONSTRUCT RAILHEAD OPERATIONS FACILITY ........................................... $15,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Air Force ...................................................... Alaska: ELMENDORF AFB—F–22 ADD/ALTER WEAPONS RELEASE SYSTEMS SHOP .............................. $10,525 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Air Force ...................................................... Alaska: EIELSON AFB—REPAIR CENTRAL HEAT PLANT AND POWER PLANT BOILERS .......................... $28,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski Navy ............................................................ Arizona: YUMA—AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR .............................................................................. $40,600 The President Navy ............................................................ Arizona: YUMA—AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR .............................................................................. $63,280 The President Navy ............................................................ Arizona: YUMA—COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADE ......................................................... $63,730 The President Navy ............................................................ Arizona: YUMA—INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY FACILITY ...................................................... $21,480 The President Navy ............................................................ Arizona: YUMA—SIMULATOR FACILITY ................................................................................................... $36,060 The President Navy ............................................................ Arizona: YUMA—UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES ..................................................................... $44,320 The President Navy ............................................................ Arizona: YUMA—VAN PAD COMPLEX RELOCATION ................................................................................ $15,590 The President Air Force ...................................................... Arizona: DAVIS–MONTHAN AFB—AMARG HANGAR ................................................................................ $25,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... Arizona: DAVIS–MONTHAN AFB—HC–130 AGE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............................................... $4,600 The President Air Force ...................................................... Arizona: DAVIS–MONTHAN AFB—HC–130J AERIAL CARGO FACILITY .................................................... $10,700 The President Air Force ...................................................... Arizona: DAVIS–MONTHAN AFB—HC–130J PARTS STORE ..................................................................... $8,200 The President Air Force ...................................................... Arizona: FORT HUACHUCA—TFI—PREDATOR LRE BEDDOWN ............................................................... $11,000 The President Air Guard .................................................... Arizona: DAVIS MONTHAN AFB—TFI—PREDATOR FOC—ACTIVE DUTY ASSOCIATE ............................. $4,650 The President Army Guard ................................................. Arizona: FLORENCE—READINESS CENTER ............................................................................................ $16,500 The President Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Arizona: YUMA—SOF MILITARY FREE FALL SIMULATOR ........................................................................ $8,977 The President 
110 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Army Guard ................................................. Arkansas: FORT CHAFFEE—COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ................................... $19,000 The President, Senators Pryor and Lincoln Army Guard ................................................. Arkansas: FORT CHAFFEE—LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE ........................................................................... $2,500 The President, Senators Pryor and Lincoln Army Guard ................................................. Arkansas: CAMP ROBINSON—COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................ $30,000 The President, Senators Pryor and Lincoln Army ............................................................ California: PRESIDIO MONTEREY—ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS ................................ $63,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Army ............................................................ California: PRESIDIO MONTEREY—GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING .................................................. $39,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Army ............................................................ California: PRESIDIO MONTEREY—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY .......................................... $38,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—BEQ—13 AREA ................................................................................... $42,864 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—BEQ—LAS FLORES ............................................................................. $37,020 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—CNATT/FRS—AVIATION TRAINING AND BEQ ....................................... $66,110 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—CONVEYANCE/WATER TREATMENT ...................................................... $100,700 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—MALS–39 MAINTENANCE HANGAR EXPANSION ................................... $48,230 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE .................................................... $9,950 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—NORTH REGION TERT TREAT PLANT (INCREMENTED) ......................... $30,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—SMALL ARMS MAGAZINE—EDSON RANGE .......................................... $3,760 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CAMP PENDLETON—TRUCK COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX .......................................... $53,490 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: CORONADO—ROTARY HANGAR ............................................................................................ $67,160 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: MIRAMAR—AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR .................................................................... $90,490 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: MIRAMAR—HANGAR 4 ......................................................................................................... $33,620 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: MIRAMAR—PARKING APRON/TAXIWAY EXPANSION .............................................................. $66,500 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: SAN DIEGO—BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, HOMEPORT ASHORE ................................. $75,342 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: SAN DIEGO—BERTHING PIER 12 REPLACEMENT AND DREDGING, PHASE 1 ...................... $108,414 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: SAN DIEGO—MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE ............................................................... $9,950 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy ............................................................ California: TWENTYNINE PALMS—BEQ AND PARKING STRUCTURE ....................................................... $53,158 The President, Senator Feinstein Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... California: POINT LOMA ANNEX—REPLACE STORAGE FACILITY INCR 3 ............................................... $20,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... California: POINT MUGU—AIRCRAFT DIRECT FUELING STATION ........................................................... $3,100 The President, Senator Feinstein Army Guard ................................................. California: CAMP ROBERTS—COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ................................ $19,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Army Reserve .............................................. California: FAIRFIELD—ARMY RESERVE CENTER .................................................................................. $26,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Army Reserve .............................................. California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT—ECS TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINT FACILITY ................................ $22,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Army Reserve .............................................. California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT—ECS WAREHOUSE ......................................................................... $15,000 The President, Senator Feinstein Army Reserve .............................................. California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT—GRENADE LAUNCHER RANGE ...................................................... $1,400 The President, Senator Feinstein Army Reserve .............................................. California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT—HAND GRENADE FAMILIARIZATION RANGE (LIVE) ........................ $1,400 The President, Senator Feinstein Army Reserve .............................................. California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT—LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE .......................................................... $2,700 The President, Senator Feinstein Army Reserve .............................................. California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT—TACTICAL VEHICLE WASH RACK .................................................. $9,500 The President, Senator Feinstein Navy Reserve .............................................. California: TWENTYNINE PALMS—TANK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ........................................... $5,991 The President, Senator Feinstein 
111 

Army ............................................................ Colorado: FORT CARSON—AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE ..................................................... $3,650 The President Army ............................................................ Colorado: FORT CARSON—BATTALION HEADQUARTERS ........................................................................ $6,700 The President Army ............................................................ Colorado: FORT CARSON—BRIGADE COMPLEX ..................................................................................... $56,000 The President Army ............................................................ Colorado: FORT CARSON—SIMULATIONS CENTER ................................................................................. $40,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... Colorado: BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE—SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS FACILITY .............................. $12,160 The President Air Force ...................................................... Colorado: PETERSON AFB—RAIDRS SPACE CONTROL FACILITY ............................................................ $24,800 The President Air Force ...................................................... Colorado: U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY—CONST CENTER FOR CHARACTER & LEADERSHIP ................... $27,600 The President Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Colorado: FORT CARSON—SOF TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE HANGAR ................................ $3,717 The President Army Guard ................................................. Colorado: COLORADO SPRINGS—READINESS CENTER .......................................................................... $20,000 The President Army Guard ................................................. Colorado: FORT CARSON—REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE ................................................................... $40,000 The President Army Guard ................................................. Colorado: GYPSUM—HAATS/AASF .......................................................................................................... $39,000 The President Army Guard ................................................. Colorado: WINDSOR—READINESS CENTER ............................................................................................ $7,500 The President Chem Demil Const ...................................... Colorado: PUEBLO DEPOT—AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY, PH XII .................................... $65,569 The President, Senators Bennet and Mark Udall Army Guard ................................................. Connecticut: WINDSOR LOCKS—READINESS CENTER (AVIATION) ......................................................... $41,000 The President, Senator Lieberman Air Force ...................................................... Delaware: DOVER AFB—C–5M/C–17 MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY, PH 2 ................................... $3,200 The President Army Guard ................................................. Delaware: NEW CASTLE—ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER [JFHQ] ................................................... $27,000 The President Air Guard .................................................... Delaware: NEW CASTLE COUNTY AIRPORT—JOINT FORCES OPERATIONS CENTER–ANG SHARE .......... $1,500 The President Air Force ...................................................... District of Columbia: BOLLING AFB—JOINT AIR DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER ................................ $13,200 The President Def-Wide—DIA ............................................ District of Columbia: BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE—REPLACE PARKING STRUCTURE, PHASE 1 ............ $3,000 The President Army ............................................................ Florida: EGLIN AFB—CHAPEL ................................................................................................................ $6,900 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Army ............................................................ Florida: MIAMI–DADE COUNTY—COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY ................................................... $41,000 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Navy ............................................................ Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND—CONSOLIDATED WAREHOUSE FACILITY ........................................................ $17,260 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Navy ............................................................ Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND—CONTAINER STAGING AND LOADING LOT ..................................................... $5,990 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Navy ............................................................ Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND—CONTAINER STORAGE LOT ........................................................................... $4,910 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Navy ............................................................ Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND—HARDSTAND EXTENSION .............................................................................. $17,930 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Navy ............................................................ Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND—PAINT AND BLAST FACILITY ......................................................................... $18,840 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Navy ............................................................ Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND—WASHRACK EXPANSION ............................................................................... $9,690 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Navy ............................................................ Florida: TAMPA—JCSE VEHICLE PAINT FACILITY ................................................................................... $2,300 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Air Force ...................................................... Florida: EGLIN AFB—F–35 FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE HANGAR ............................................................ $11,400 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Air Force ...................................................... Florida: HURLBURT FIELD—ADD TO VISITING QUARTERS (24 RM) ....................................................... $4,500 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Air Force ...................................................... Florida: HURLBURT FIELD—ADAL SPECIAL OPERATIONS SCHOOL FACILITY ......................................... $6,170 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Air Force ...................................................... Florida: HURLBURT FIELD—BASE LOGISTICS FACILITY ......................................................................... $24,000 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Air Force ...................................................... Florida: PATRICK AFB—AIR FORCE TECHNICAL APPLICATION CENTER ................................................. $100,009 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Florida: EGLIN AFB—SOF GROUND SUPPORT BATTALION DETACHMENT .............................................. $6,030 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Air Guard .................................................... Florida: JACKSONVILLE IAP—SECURITY FORCES TRAINING FACILITY .................................................... $6,700 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Army Reserve .............................................. Florida: NORTH FORT MYERS—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND ............................................................ $13,800 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Army Reserve .............................................. Florida: ORLANDO—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .............................................................................. $10,200 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Army Reserve .............................................. Florida: TALLAHASSEE—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND ....................................................................... $10,400 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Air Force Reserve ........................................ Florida: PATRICK AFB—WEAPONS MAINTENANCE FACILITY .................................................................. $3,420 The President, Senator Bill Nelson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT BENNING—LAND ACQUISITION ....................................................................................... $12,200 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson 
112 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT BENNING—TRAINEE BARRACKS, PH 2 .......................................................................... $51,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT BENNING—TRAINING BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 2 ........................................................ $14,600 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT BENNING—TRAINING BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 2 ........................................................ $14,600 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT BENNING—VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ..................................................................... $53,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT GORDON—TRAINING AIDS CENTER ................................................................................ $4,150 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT STEWART—AUTOMATED INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE ..................................... $6,200 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT STEWART—AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE ................................... $9,100 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT STEWART—AVIATION UNIT OPERATIONS COMPLEX ....................................................... $47,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT STEWART—BATTALION COMPLEX ................................................................................... $18,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT STEWART—GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING ............................................................... $8,200 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT STEWART—MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE ................................................................. $3,750 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT STEWART—SIMULATIONS CENTER ................................................................................. $26,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Georgia: FORT STEWART—TRAINING AIDS CENTER ............................................................................... $7,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Navy ............................................................ Georgia: KINGS BAY—SECURITY ENCLAVE & VEHICLE BARRIERS ....................................................... $45,004 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Navy ............................................................ Georgia: KINGS BAY—WATERFRONT EMERGENCY POWER .................................................................... $15,660 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... Georgia: HUNTER ANGS—FUEL UNLOAD FACILITY ................................................................................ $2,400 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... Georgia: FORT BENNING—DEXTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONSTRUCT GYM ....................................... $2,800 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Def-Wide—NSA ........................................... Georgia: AUGUSTA—NSA/CSS GEORGIA TRAINING FACILITY ................................................................. $12,855 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Georgia: FORT BENNING—SOF MWD KENNEL COMPLEX ....................................................................... $3,624 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Georgia: HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD—SOF TEMF EXPANSION .................................................................. $3,318 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Georgia: FORT BENNING—SOF COMPANY SUPPORT FACILITY .............................................................. $20,441 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Georgia: FORT STEWART—HEALTH CLINIC ADDTION/ALTERATION ......................................................... $35,100 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army Guard ................................................. Georgia: CUMMING—READINESS CENTER ............................................................................................. $17,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army Guard ................................................. Georgia: DOBBINS ARB—READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ....................................................................... $10,400 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Air Guard .................................................... Georgia: SAVANNAH/HILTON HEAD IAP—RELOCATE AIR SUPT OPERS SQDN ........................................ $7,450 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army Reserve .............................................. Georgia: MACON—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND ................................................................................ $11,400 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Hawaii: FORT SHAFTER—COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY, PH 1 .................................................... $58,000 The President, Senator Inouye Army ............................................................ Hawaii: FORT SHAFTER—FLOOD MITIGATION ........................................................................................ $23,000 The President, Senator Inouye Army ............................................................ Hawaii: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS—BARRACKS ........................................................................................ $90,000 The President, Senator Inouye Army ............................................................ Hawaii: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS—BARRACKS ........................................................................................ $98,000 The President, Senator Inouye Army ............................................................ Hawaii: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS—TRAINING AIDS CENTER .................................................................... $24,000 The President, Senator Inouye Army ............................................................ Hawaii: TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER—BARRACKS ....................................................................... $28,000 The President, Senator Inouye Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: CAMP SMITH—PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER .............................................................................. $29,960 The President, Senator Inouye Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: KANEOHE BAY—BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................................... $90,530 The President, Senator Inouye 
113 

Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: KANEOHE BAY—WATERFRONT OPERATIONS FACILITY .............................................................. $19,130 The President, Senator Inouye Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: PEARL HARBOR—CTR FOR DISASTER MGT/HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE ................................ $9,140 The President, Senator Inouye Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: PEARL HARBOR—JOINT POW/MIA ACCOUNTING COMMAND ..................................................... $99,328 The President, Senator Inouye Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... Hawaii: HICKAM AFB—ALTER FUEL STORAGE TANKS ........................................................................... $8,500 The President, Senator Inouye Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Hawaii: PEARL HARBOR—NSWG3 COMMAND AND OPERATIONS FACILITY ........................................... $28,804 The President, Senator Inouye Army Guard ................................................. Hawaii: KALAELOA—COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ........................................................... $38,000 The President, Senator Inouye Air Guard .................................................... Hawaii: HICKAM AFB—TFI—F–22 BEDDOWN INTRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT .......................................... $5,950 The President, Senator Inouye Air Guard .................................................... Hawaii: HICKAM AFB—TFI—F–22 HANGAR, SQUADRON OPERATIONS AND AMU ................................ $48,250 The President, Senator Inouye Air Guard .................................................... Hawaii: HICKAM AFB—TFI—F–22 UPGRADE MUNITIONS COMPLEX ..................................................... $17,250 The President, Senator Inouye Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... Idaho: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB—REPLACE POL FUEL STORAGE TANKS .................................................. $27,500 The President Army Guard ................................................. Idaho: GOWEN FIELD—BARRACKS [ORTC], PH 1 .................................................................................. $17,500 The President Army Guard ................................................. Idaho: MOUNTAIN HOME—TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY .................................... $6,300 The President Def-Wide—DISA .......................................... Illinois: SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE—FIELD COMMAND FACILITY UPGRADE ............................................. $1,388 The President, Senator Durbin Army Guard ................................................. Illinois: SPRINGFIELD—COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ADD/ALT ....................................... $15,000 The President, Senator Durbin Air Guard .................................................... Illinois: CAPITAL MAP—TFI—CNAF BEDDOWN—UPGRADE FACILITIES ................................................ $16,700 The President, Senator Durbin Army Reserve .............................................. Illinois: QUINCY—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND ................................................................................. $12,200 The President, Senator Durbin Air Guard .................................................... Indiana: HULMAN REGIONAL AIRPORT—TFI—ASOS BEDDOWN—UPGRADE FACILITIES ...................... $4,100 The President Army Reserve .............................................. Indiana: MICHIGAN CITY—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND ................................................................... $15,500 The President Army Reserve .............................................. Iowa: DES MOINES—ARMY RESERVE CENTER ...................................................................................... $8,175 The President Army ............................................................ Kansas: FORT LEAVENWORTH—VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................................. $7,100 The President Army ............................................................ Kansas: FORT RILEY—AUTOMATED INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE ............................................... $4,100 The President Army ............................................................ Kansas: FORT RILEY—AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION/TRAINING RANGE .................................................. $14,800 The President Army ............................................................ Kansas: FORT RILEY—BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 1 .............................................................................. $31,000 The President Army ............................................................ Kansas: FORT RILEY—KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE ................................................................................. $7,200 The President Army Guard ................................................. Kansas: WICHITA—FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP ..................................................................................... $24,000 The President Army Guard ................................................. Kansas: WICHITA—READINESS CENTER ................................................................................................ $43,000 The President Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL—AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE ................................................. $1,500 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL—BRIGADE COMPLEX ................................................................................. $67,000 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL—COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES ......................................................... $25,000 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL—RAPPELLING TRAINING AREA ................................................................... $5,600 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL—UNIT OPERATIONS FACILITIES ................................................................. $26,000 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL—URBAN ASSAULT COURSE ....................................................................... $3,300 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL—VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................................. $15,500 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT KNOX—ACCESS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................... $6,000 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: FORT KNOX—MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ........................................................... $12,800 The President, Senator McConnell Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL—SOF BATTALION OPS COMPLEX ............................................................... $38,095 The President, Senator McConnell Army Guard ................................................. Kentucky: BURLINGTON—READINESS CENTER ...................................................................................... $19,500 The President, Senator McConnell Chem Demil Const ...................................... Kentucky: BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT—AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION, PH XI .................................. $59,402 The President, Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Louisiana: FORT POLK—BARRACKS ...................................................................................................... $29,000 The President, Senator Landrieu Army ............................................................ Louisiana: FORT POLK—HEAVY SNIPER RANGE .................................................................................... $4,250 The President, Senator Landrieu 
114 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Army ............................................................ Louisiana: FORT POLK—LAND ACQUISITION .......................................................................................... $6,000 The President, Senator Landrieu Army ............................................................ Louisiana: FORT POLK—LAND ACQUISITION .......................................................................................... $24,000 The President, Senator Landrieu Air Force ...................................................... Louisiana: BARKSDALE AFB—WEAPONS LOAD CREW TRAINING FACILITY ............................................ $18,140 The President, Senator Landrieu Army Guard ................................................. Louisiana: FORT POLK—TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY ....................................... $5,500 The President, Senator Landrieu Army Guard ................................................. Louisiana: MINDEN—READINESS CENTER ............................................................................................. $28,000 The President, Senator Landrieu Navy Reserve .............................................. Louisiana: NEW ORLEANS—JOINT AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITY ..................................................... $16,281 The President, Senator Landrieu Army ............................................................ Maryland: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND—AUTO TECH EVALUATE FACILITY, PH 2 .............................. $14,600 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Army ............................................................ Maryland: FORT MEADE—INDOOR FIRING RANGE ................................................................................. $7,600 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Army ............................................................ Maryland: FORT MEADE—WIDEBAND SATCOM OPERATIONS CENTER ................................................... $25,000 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Navy ............................................................ Maryland: INDIAN HEAD—AGILE CHEMICAL FACILITY, PHASE 2 ........................................................... $34,238 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Navy ............................................................ Maryland: PATUXENT RIVER—BROAD AREA MARITIME SURVEILLANCE T & E FACILITY ...................... $42,211 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... Maryland: ANDREWS AFB—REPLACE FUEL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ................................. $14,000 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—NSA ........................................... Maryland: FORT MEADE—NORTH CAMPUS UTILITY PLANT ................................................................... $219,360 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND—USAMRICD REPLACEMENT, INC 3 ..................................... $105,000 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: BETHESDA NAVAL HOSPITAL—NNMC PARKING EXPANSION ................................................. $17,100 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: BETHESDA NAVAL HOSPITAL—TRANSIENT WOUNDED WARRIOR LODGING ........................... $62,900 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK—CONSOLIDATED LOGISTICS FACILITY .......................................................... $23,100 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK—INFORMATION SERVICES FACILITY EXPANSION .......................................... $4,300 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK—NIBC SECURITY FENCING AND EQUIPMENT ............................................... $2,700 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK—SUPPLEMENTAL WATER STORAGE .............................................................. $3,700 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK—USAMRIID STAGE I, INC 5 .......................................................................... $17,400 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK—WATER TREATMENT PLANT REPAIR & SUPPLEMENT ................................. $11,900 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Army Guard ................................................. Maryland: ST. INIGOES—TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY ....................................... $5,500 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Air Guard .................................................... Maryland: MARTIN STATE AIRPORT—REPLACE OPS AND MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY ....................... $11,400 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Massachusetts: HANSCOM AFB—MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC ADDITION ................................................... $2,900 The President, Senator Kerry Army Guard ................................................. Massachusetts: HANSCOM AFB—ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER [JFHQ], PH 2 ............................ $23,000 The President, Senator Kerry Army Reserve .............................................. Massachusetts: DEVENS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA—AUTOMATED RECORD FIRE RANGE ..... $4,700 The President, Senator Kerry Army Guard ................................................. Michigan: CAMP GRAYLING RANGE—COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY .................... $19,000 The President, Senators Levin and Stabenow Army Guard ................................................. Minnesota: ARDEN HILLS—FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP ........................................................................ $29,000 The President Army Guard ................................................. Minnesota: CAMP RIPLEY—INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE ........................................................... $4,300 The President Army Guard ................................................. Minnesota: CAMP RIPLEY—TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY .................................. $4,450 The President Army ............................................................ Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD—BARRACKS ....................................................................................... $29,000 The President Army ............................................................ Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD—BRIGADE HEADQUARTERS ............................................................... $12,200 The President Army ............................................................ Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD—GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING .................................................. $7,000 The President 
115 

Army ............................................................ Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD—INFORMATION SYSTEMS FACILITY ................................................... $15,500 The President Army ............................................................ Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD—TRAINING BARRACKS ...................................................................... $19,000 The President Army ............................................................ Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD—TRANSIENT ADVANCED TRAINEE BARRACKS, PH 2 ........................ $29,000 The President Army Reserve .............................................. Missouri: BELTON—ARMY RESERVE CENTER ........................................................................................ $11,800 The President Army Guard ................................................. Nebraska: LINCOLN—READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ............................................................................. $3,300 The President, Senator Ben Nelson Army Guard ................................................. Nebraska: MEAD—READINESS CENTER ................................................................................................. $11,400 The President, Senator Ben Nelson Air Force ...................................................... Nevada: CREECH AFB—UAS AIRFIELD FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION ................................................. $11,710 The President, Senator Reid Air Force ...................................................... Nevada: NELLIS AFB—F–35 ADD/ALTER FLIGHT TEST INSTRUMENTATION FA ...................................... $1,900 The President, Senator Reid Air Force ...................................................... Nevada: NELLIS AFB—F–35 ADD/ALTER 422 TEST EVALUATION SQUADRON ....................................... $7,870 The President, Senator Reid Air Force ...................................................... Nevada: NELLIS AFB—F–35 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ................................................................... $13,110 The President, Senator Reid Air Force ...................................................... Nevada: NELLIS AFB—F–35 MAINTENANCE HANGAR/AMU ................................................................... $28,760 The President, Senator Reid Army Guard ................................................. New Hampshire: PEMBROKE—BARRACKS FACILITY (REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE) ........................ $15,000 The President Army Guard ................................................. New Hampshire: PEMBROKE—CLASSROOM FACILITY (REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE) ...................... $21,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... New Jersey: MCGUIRE AFB—BASE OPS/COMMAND POST FACILITY [TFI] .............................................. $8,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg and 

Menendez 

Air Force ...................................................... New Jersey: MCGUIRE AFB—DORMITORY (120 RM) ............................................................................. $18,440 The President, Senators Lautenberg and 

Menendez 

Army ............................................................ New Mexico: WHITE SANDS—BARRACKS ............................................................................................... $29,000 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB—DORMITORY (96 RM) ................................................................................ $14,000 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB—UAS SQUADRON OPS FACILITY ................................................................. $20,000 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: HOLLOMAN AFB—UAS ADD/ALTER MAINTENANCE HANGAR ............................................. $15,470 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: HOLLOMAN AFB—UAS MAINTENANCE HANGAR ................................................................ $22,500 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: KIRTLAND AFB—AERIAL DELIVERY FACILITY ADDITION .................................................... $3,800 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: KIRTLAND AFB—ARMAMENT SHOP ................................................................................... $6,460 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: KIRTLAND AFB—H/MC–130 FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................ $14,142 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB—SOF HANGAR/AMU (MC–130J) .................................................................. $24,622 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB—SOF AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON (MC–130J) ............................................ $12,636 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB—SOF C–130 PARKING APRON PHASE I ..................................................... $26,006 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 
116 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB—SOF OPERATIONS AND TRAINING COMPLEX ............................................. $39,674 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB—SOF ADD/ALT SIMULATOR FACILITY FOR MC–130 ................................... $13,287 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... New Mexico: WHITE SANDS—HEALTH AND DENTAL CLINICS ................................................................ $22,900 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Army Guard ................................................. New Mexico: FARMINGTON—READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ................................................................... $8,500 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Army Reserve .............................................. New Mexico: LAS CRUCES—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND ................................................................. $11,400 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom 

Udall 

Army ............................................................ New York: FORT DRUM—AIRCRAFT FUEL STORAGE COMPLEX ............................................................. $14,600 The President Army ............................................................ New York: FORT DRUM—AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ................................................................. $16,500 The President Army ............................................................ New York: FORT DRUM—BATTALION COMPLEX ..................................................................................... $61,000 The President Army ............................................................ New York: FORT DRUM—BRIGADE COMPLEX, PH 1 .............................................................................. $55,000 The President Army ............................................................ New York: FORT DRUM—INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE ............................................................... $8,200 The President Army ............................................................ New York: FORT DRUM—TRAINING AIDS CENTER ................................................................................. $18,500 The President Army ............................................................ New York: FORT DRUM—TRANSIENT TRAINING BARRACKS .................................................................. $55,000 The President Army ............................................................ New York: U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY—SCIENCE FACILITY, PH 2 ........................................................... $130,624 The President Army ............................................................ New York: U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY—URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .......................................................... $1,700 The President Air Force ...................................................... New York: FORT DRUM—20TH AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON COMPLEX ............................... $20,440 The President Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... New York: U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY—WEST POINT MS ADD/ALT .......................................................... $27,960 The President Air Guard .................................................... New York: FORT DRUM—TFI—REAPER INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ................................................... $2,500 The President Air Guard .................................................... New York: STEWART IAP—BASE DEFENSE GROUP BEDDOWN .............................................................. $14,250 The President Army Reserve .............................................. New York: BINGHAMTON—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .................................................................... $13,400 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—BATTALION COMPLEX ........................................................................... $33,000 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—BRIGADE COMPLEX .............................................................................. $25,000 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—BRIGADE COMPLEX .............................................................................. $41,000 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—BRIGADE COMPLEX .............................................................................. $50,000 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY ..................................................... $53,000 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES ...................................................... $12,600 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—DINING FACILITY .................................................................................. $11,200 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—MURCHISON ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION ................................. $17,000 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—STAGING AREA COMPLEX ..................................................................... $14,600 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—STUDENT BARRACKS ............................................................................ $18,000 The President 
117 

Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................................. $7,500 The President Army ............................................................ North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................................. $28,000 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—2ND INTEL BN MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX .................................. $90,270 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—ARMORY—II MEF—WALLACE CREEK .............................................. $12,280 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—BEQ—CAMP JOHNSON ..................................................................... $46,550 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—BEQ—COURTHOUSE BAY ................................................................. $40,780 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—BEQ—COURTHOUSE BAY ................................................................. $42,330 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—BEQ—FRENCH CREEK ..................................................................... $43,640 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—BEQ—RIFLE RANGE ......................................................................... $55,350 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—BEQ—WALLACE CREEK ................................................................... $51,660 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—BEQ—WALLACE CREEK NORTH ....................................................... $46,290 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—EOD ADDITION—2ND MARINE LOGISTICS GROUP ........................... $7,420 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—HANGAR ............................................................................................ $73,010 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—MAINTENANCE HANGAR [HMLA] ....................................................... $74,260 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX—2ND ANGLICO ................................ $36,100 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE ................................................. $9,950 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—MESS HALL—FRENCH CREEK .......................................................... $25,960 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—MESS HALL ADDITION—COURTHOUSE BAY ..................................... $2,553 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—MOTOR TRANSPORTATION/COMM. MAINT. FACILITY ......................... $18,470 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—UTILITY EXPANSION—FRENCH CREEK ............................................. $56,050 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—UTILITY EXPANSION—HADNOT POINT .............................................. $56,470 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CHERRY POINT MCAS—BEQ ........................................................................................ $42,500 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CHERRY POINT MCAS—MARINERS BAY LAND ACQUISITION—BOGUE ........................ $3,790 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CHERRY POINT MCAS—MISSILE MAGAZINE ................................................................ $13,420 The President Navy ............................................................ North Carolina: CHERRY POINT MCAS—STATION INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES .................................. $5,800 The President Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE—TARAWA TERRACE I ES REPLACE SCHOOL ...................................... $16,646 The President Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—MCNAIR ES—REPLACE SCHOOL ......................................................... $23,086 The President Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—MURRAY ES—REPLACE SCHOOL ........................................................ $22,000 The President Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—SOF OPERATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY .................................. $11,000 The President Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—SOF ADMIN/COMPANY OPERATIONS ..................................................... $10,347 The President Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—SOF OPERATIONS ADDITIONS ............................................................... $15,795 The President Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—SOF JOINT INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE FACILITY ...................................... $32,000 The President Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—SOF C4 FACILITY—JSOC ..................................................................... $41,000 The President Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG—SOF OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY .................................................. $13,465 The President Army Guard ................................................. North Carolina: HIGH POINT—READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ................................................................ $1,551 The President Air Guard .................................................... North Carolina: STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT—UPGRADE ASOS FACILITIES ............................................. $2,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... North Dakota: MINOT AFB—CONTROL TOWER/BASE OPERATIONS FACILITY ......................................... $18,770 The President, Senators Dorgan and Conrad Army Guard ................................................. North Dakota: CAMP GRAFTON—READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT ............................................................ $11,200 The President, Senators Dorgan and Conrad Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... Ohio: COLUMBUS—REPLACE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY ........................................................................ $7,400 The President Army ............................................................ Oklahoma: FORT SILL—GENERAL PURPOSE STORAGE BUILDING ......................................................... $13,800 The President 
118 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Army ............................................................ Oklahoma: MCALESTER—IGLOO STORAGE, DEPOT LEVEL .................................................................... $3,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... Oklahoma: TINKER AFB—UPGRADE BUILDING 3001 INFRASTRUCTURE, PH III .................................... $14,000 The President Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... Pennsylvania: DEF DISTRIBUTION DEPOT NEW CUMBERLAND—REPLACE HEADQUARTERS FACILITY .. $96,000 The President, Senators Specter and Casey Air Guard .................................................... Pennsylvania: STATE COLLEGE ANGS—ADD TO AND ALTER AOS FACILITY .......................................... $4,100 The President, Senators Specter and Casey Navy ............................................................ Rhode Island: NEWPORT—ELECTROMAGNETIC SENSOR FACILITY ........................................................ $27,007 The President, Senator Reed Army Guard ................................................. Rhode Island: EAST GREENWICH—UNITED STATES PROPERTY & FISCAL OFFICE ................................ $27,000 The President, Senator Reed Army ............................................................ South Carolina: FORT JACKSON—TRAINING AIDS CENTER ................................................................... $17,000 The President, Senator Graham Army ............................................................ South Carolina: FORT JACKSON—TRAINEE BARRACKS ......................................................................... $28,000 The President, Senator Graham Army ............................................................ South Carolina: FORT JACKSON—TRAINEE BARRACKS COMPLEX, PH 1 .............................................. $46,000 The President, Senator Graham Navy ............................................................ South Carolina: BEAUFORT—AICUZ LAND ACQUISITION ....................................................................... $21,190 The President, Senator Graham Navy ............................................................ South Carolina: BEAUFORT—AIRCRAFT HANGAR—VMFAT—502 ......................................................... $46,550 The President, Senator Graham Navy ............................................................ South Carolina: BEAUFORT—PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER .................................................................... $15,430 The President, Senator Graham Navy ............................................................ South Carolina: BEAUFORT—TRAINING AND SIMULATOR FACILITY ....................................................... $46,240 The President, Senator Graham Air Force ...................................................... South Carolina: CHARLESTON AFB—CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLEX [TFI]—PHASE 1 ............................... $15,000 The President, Senator Graham Army Guard ................................................. South Dakota: WATERTOWN—READINESS CENTER ............................................................................... $25,000 The President, Senator Johnson Air Guard .................................................... Tennessee: NASHVILLE IAP—TFI—RENOVATE INTEL SQUADRON FACILITIES ........................................ $5,500 The President Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE ............................................ $6,700 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES ...................................................................... $18,500 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE ........................................................... $22,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—HEAVY SNIPER RANGE ......................................................................................... $3,500 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—INDOOR SWIMMING POOL ..................................................................................... $15,500 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE ................................................................................... $2,100 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—LIVE FIRE EXERCISE SHOOTHOUSE ...................................................................... $3,150 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—SCOUT/RECCE GUNNERY COMPLEX ..................................................................... $15,500 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—SQUAD DEFENSE RANGE ...................................................................................... $3,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—THAAD BATTERY COMPLEX ................................................................................... $17,500 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—TRANSIENT TRAINING COMPLEX ........................................................................... $31,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .................................................................................... $2,800 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT BLISS—VEHICLE BRIDGE OVERPASS ................................................................................ $8,700 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT HOOD—BATTALION COMPLEX ........................................................................................... $40,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT HOOD—BRIGADE COMPLEX .............................................................................................. $38,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT HOOD—COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES ...................................................................... $4,300 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT HOOD—CONVOY LIVE FIRE ............................................................................................... $3,200 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT HOOD—LIVE FIRE EXERCISE SHOOTHOUSE ...................................................................... $2,100 The President, Senator Hutchison 
119 

Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT HOOD—UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM [UAS]HANGAR ......................................................... $55,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT HOOD—URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .................................................................................... $2,450 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT SAM HOUSTON—SIMULATIONS CENTER ............................................................................ $16,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Army ............................................................ Texas: FORT SAM HOUSTON—TRAINING AIDS CENTER ......................................................................... $6,200 The President, Senator Hutchison Air Force ...................................................... Texas: DYESS AFB—C–130J ADD/ALTER FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ................................................ $4,080 The President, Senator Hutchison Air Force ...................................................... Texas: ELLINGTON FIELD—TFI—UPGRADE UAV MAINTENANCE HANGAR .............................................. $7,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Air Force ...................................................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB—BMT SATELLITE CLASSROOM/DINING FACILITY NO. 2 ..................................... $32,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Air Force ...................................................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB—ONE-COMPANY FIRE STATION ......................................................................... $5,500 The President, Senator Hutchison Air Force ...................................................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB—RECRUIT DORMITORY, PHASE 3 ..................................................................... $67,980 The President, Senator Hutchison Air Force ...................................................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB—RECRUIT/FAMILY INPROCESSING & INFO CENTER .......................................... $21,800 The President, Senator Hutchison Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB—AMBULATORY CARE CENTER, PH 2 ................................................................ $120,000 The President, Senator Hutchison Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Texas: FORT BLISS—HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT INCR 2 ......................................................................... $147,100 The President, Senator Hutchison Army Guard ................................................. Texas: CAMP MAXEY—COMBAT PISTOL/MILITARY PISTOL QUALIFICATION ............................................ $2,500 The President, Senator Hutchison Army Guard ................................................. Texas: CAMP SWIFT—URBAN ASSAULT COURSE ................................................................................... $2,600 The President, Senator Hutchison Army Reserve .............................................. Texas: DENTON—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .................................................................................. $12,600 The President, Senator Hutchison Army Reserve .............................................. Texas: RIO GRANDE—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND ........................................................................... $6,100 The President, Senator Hutchison Army Reserve .............................................. Texas: SAN MARCOS—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND .......................................................................... $8,500 The President, Senator Hutchison Air Force ...................................................... Utah: HILL AFB—F–22 T–10 ENGINE TEST CELL ................................................................................. $2,800 The President Def-Wide—NSA ........................................... Utah: CAMP WILLIAMS—CNCI DATA CENTER INCREMENT 2 ................................................................ $398,358 The President Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL—1200 METER RANGE .................................................................................... $14,500 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL—INDOOR FIRING RANGE ................................................................................ $6,200 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL—KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE ........................................................................... $3,800 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL—LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE .......................................................................... $4,100 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL—MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ....................................................... $65,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT EUSTIS—WARRIOR IN TRANSITION COMPLEX ............................................................... $18,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT LEE—AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE .................................................... $7,700 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT LEE—COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITY ......................................................................... $4,900 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Virginia: FORT LEE—TRAINING AIDS CENTER ....................................................................................... $5,800 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Navy ............................................................ Virginia: NORFOLK—PIER 1 UPGRADES TO BERTH USNS COMFORT .................................................... $10,035 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Navy ............................................................ Virginia: NORFOLK—PIERS 9 AND 10 UPGRADES FOR DDG 1000 ....................................................... $2,400 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Navy ............................................................ Virginia: QUANTICO—ACADEMIC FACILITY ADDITION—SNCOA ............................................................. $12,080 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Navy ............................................................ Virginia: QUANTICO—BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS—WTBN ........................................................... $37,810 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Navy ............................................................ Virginia: QUANTICO—RESEARCH CENTER ADDITION—MCU ................................................................. $37,920 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Navy ............................................................ Virginia: QUANTICO—STUDENT OFFICER QUARTERS—TBS .................................................................. $55,822 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Navy ............................................................ Virginia: PORTSMOUTH—SHIP REPAIR PIER REPLACEMENT (INCREMENTED) ...................................... $100,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Air Force ...................................................... Virginia: LANGLEY AFB—F–22 ADD/ALTER HANGAR BAY LO/CR FACILITY—TF ................................... $8,800 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Def-Wide ..................................................... Virginia: PENTAGON—PENTAGON METRO & CORRIDOR 8 SCREENING FACILITY ................................. $6,473 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Def-Wide ..................................................... Virginia: PENTAGON—POWER PLANT MODERNIZATION PHASE 3 .......................................................... $51,928 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Def-Wide ..................................................... Virginia: PENTAGON—SECURE ACCESS LANE—REMOTE VEHICLE SCREENING ................................... $4,923 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... Virginia: CRANEY ISLAND—REPLACE FUEL PIER .................................................................................. $58,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner 
120 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... Virginia: QUANTICO—NEW CONSOLIDATED ELEMETARY SCHOOL ......................................................... $47,355 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Virginia: FORT BELVOIR—DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT .................................................................... $6,300 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army Reserve .............................................. Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL—ARMY RESERVE CENTER ............................................................................. $15,500 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army Reserve .............................................. Virginia: FORT STORY—ARMY RESERVE CENTER ................................................................................. $11,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army Reserve .............................................. Virginia: ROANOKE—ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND ............................................................................ $14,800 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Navy Reserve .............................................. Virginia: WILLIAMSBURG—NAVY ORDNANCE CARGO LOGISTICS TRAINING COMPLEX .......................... $21,346 The President, Senators Webb and Warner Army ............................................................ Washington: YAKIMA—SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE ............................................................................... $3,750 The President, Senator Murray Army ............................................................ Washington: FORT LEWIS—BARRACKS .................................................................................................. $47,000 The President, Senator Murray Army ............................................................ Washington: FORT LEWIS—BARRACKS COMPLEX ................................................................................. $40,000 The President, Senator Murray Army ............................................................ Washington: FORT LEWIS—RAPPELLING TRAINING AREA ..................................................................... $5,300 The President, Senator Murray Army ............................................................ Washington: FORT LEWIS—REGIONAL LOGISTIC SPT COMPLEX WAREHOUSE ...................................... $16,500 The President, Senator Murray Army ............................................................ Washington: FORT LEWIS—REGIONAL LOGISTIC SUPPORT COMPLEX ................................................... $63,000 The President, Senator Murray Navy ............................................................ Washington: BANGOR—LIMITED AREA EMERGENCY POWER ................................................................ $15,810 The President, Senator Murray Navy ............................................................ Washington: BANGOR—CSDS–5 LABORATORY EXPANSION PHASE 1 ................................................... $16,170 The President, Senator Murray Navy ............................................................ Washington: BANGOR—WATERFRONT RESTRICTED AREA EMERGENCY POWER ................................... $24,913 The President, Senator Murray Navy ............................................................ Washington: BREMERTON—LIMITED AREA PRODUCT/STRG CMPLX (INCREMENTED) ........................... $19,116 The President, Senator Murray Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Washington: FORT LEWIS—PREVENTIVE MEDICINE FACILITY ............................................................... $8,400 The President, Senator Murray Army Guard ................................................. Washington: TACOMA—COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ...................................................... $25,000 The President, Senator Murray Navy Reserve .............................................. Washington: YAKIMA—MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER ................................................................... $13,844 The President, Senator Murray Army Guard ................................................. West Virginia: MOOREFIELD—READINESS CENTER ............................................................................... $14,200 The President Army Guard ................................................. West Virginia: MORGANTOWN—READINESS CENTER ............................................................................ $21,000 The President Army Guard ................................................. Wisconsin: MADISON—AIRCRAFT PARKING ........................................................................................... $5,700 The President Army Reserve .............................................. Wisconsin: FORT MCCOY—AT/MOB BILLETING COMPLEX PHASE I ....................................................... $9,800 The President Army Reserve .............................................. Wisconsin: FORT MCCOY—NCO ACADEMY PHASE II ............................................................................. $10,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... Wyoming: CAMP GUERNSEY—NUCLEAR/SPACE SECURITY TACTICS TRAINING CENTER ....................... $4,650 The President Army Guard ................................................. Wyoming: LARAMIE—FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP .................................................................................. $14,400 The President Navy ............................................................ Bahrain Island: SW ASIA—NAVCENT AMMUNITION MAGAZINES ........................................................... $89,280 The President Navy ............................................................ Bahrain Island: SW ASIA—OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT FACILITIES ..................................................... $60,002 The President Navy ............................................................ Bahrain Island: SW ASIA—WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, PHASE 3 ..................................................... $63,871 The President Air Force ...................................................... Bahrain Island: SW ASIA—NORTH APRON EXPANSION ......................................................................... $45,000 The President Def-Wide ..................................................... Belgium: BRUSSELS—NATO HEADQUARTERS FACILITY ......................................................................... $31,863 The President Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... Belgium: BRUSSELS—REPLACE SHAPE MS/HS ..................................................................................... $67,311 The President Navy ............................................................ Djibouti: CAMP LEMONIER—CAMP LEMONIER HQ FACILITY ................................................................. $12,407 The President Navy ............................................................ Djibouti: CAMP LEMONIER—GENERAL WAREHOUSE ............................................................................. $7,324 The President 
121 

Navy ............................................................ Djibouti: CAMP LEMONIER—PAVE EXTERNAL ROADS ........................................................................... $3,824 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: ANSBACH—PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER ................................................................................ $13,800 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: ANSBACH—VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................................................................ $18,000 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: GRAFENWOEHR—BARRACKS ................................................................................................. $17,500 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: GRAFENWOEHR—BARRACKS ................................................................................................. $19,000 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: GRAFENWOEHR—BARRACKS ................................................................................................. $19,000 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: GRAFENWOEHR—BARRACKS ................................................................................................. $20,000 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: RHINE ORDNANCE BARRACKS—BARRACKS COMPLEX .......................................................... $35,000 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: SEMBACH AB—CONFINEMENT FACILITY ................................................................................ $9,100 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: WIESBADEN AB—COMMAND AND BATTLE CENTER, INCR 2 ................................................. $59,500 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: WIESBADEN AB—CONSTRUCT NEW ACP ............................................................................... $5,100 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: WIESBADEN AB—INFORMATION PROCESSING CENTER ......................................................... $30,400 The President Army ............................................................ Germany: WIESBADEN AB—SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION FACILITY .............................. $45,500 The President Air Force ...................................................... Germany: KAPAUN—DORMITORY (128 RM) ........................................................................................... $19,600 The President Air Force ...................................................... Germany: RAMSTEIN AB—CONSTRUCT C–130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ...................................... $8,800 The President Air Force ...................................................... Germany: RAMSTEIN AB—DEICING FLUID STORAGE & DISPENSING FACILITY ...................................... $2,754 The President Air Force ...................................................... Germany: RAMSTEIN AB—UAS SATCOM RELAY PADS & FACILITY ........................................................ $10,800 The President Air Force ...................................................... Germany: VILSECK—AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON [ASOS] .................................................... $12,900 The President Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... Germany: PANZER KASERNE—REPLACE BOEBLINGEN HS .................................................................... $48,968 The President Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Germany: KATTERBACH—HEALTH/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT ........................................................ $37,100 The President Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Germany: VILSECK—HEALTH CLINIC ADD/ALT ....................................................................................... $34,800 The President Navy ............................................................ Guam: GUAM—APRA HARBOR WHARVES IMP. (PHASE 1, INC) ............................................................ $40,000 The President Navy ............................................................ Guam: GUAM—DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................... $66,730 The President Air Force ...................................................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB—GUAM STRIKE OPS GROUP & TANKER TASK FORCE ..................................... $9,100 The President Air Force ...................................................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB—GUAM STRIKE SOUTH RAMP UTILITIES, PHASE 1 .......................................... $12,200 The President Air Force ...................................................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB—PRTC—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS FACILITY .......................... $9,200 The President Air Force ...................................................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB—PRTC—RED HORSE HEADQUARTERS/ENGINEERING FACILITY ...................... $8,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB—PRTC—COMMANDO WARRIOR OPEN BAY STUDENT BARRACKS ................... $11,800 The President Army Guard ................................................. Guam: BARRIGADA—COMBINED SUPPORT MAINT SHOP PH 1 ............................................................. $19,000 The President Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Guam: AGANA NAVAL AIR STATION—HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT, INCR 2 .............................................. $70,000 The President Army ............................................................ Italy: VICENZA—BDE COMPLEX—BARRACKS/COMMUNITY, INCR 4 ..................................................... $26,000 The President Army ............................................................ Italy: VICENZA—BDE COMPLEX—OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY, INCR 4 ........................................ $25,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... Italy: AVIANO AB—AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON [ASOS] FACILITY ....................................... $10,200 The President Air Force ...................................................... Italy: AVIANO AB—DORMITORY (144 RM) ............................................................................................. $19,000 The President Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... Japan: KADENA AB—INSTALL FUEL FILTERS–SEPARATORS .................................................................. $3,000 The President Navy ............................................................ Japan: ATSUGI—MH–60R/S TRAINER FACILITY ..................................................................................... $6,908 The President Air Force ...................................................... Korea: KUNSAN AB—CONSTRUCT DMT FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ................................................... $7,500 The President Army ............................................................ Korea: CAMP WALKER—ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UPGRADE & NATURAL GAS SYSTEM ............................. $19,500 The President Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... Puerto Rico: FORT BUCHANAN—ANTILLES ES/IS—REPLACE SCHOOL .................................................. $58,708 The President Army Guard ................................................. Puerto Rico: CAMP SANTIAGO—LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE .................................................................... $3,100 The President 
122 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Army Guard ................................................. Puerto Rico: CAMP SANTIAGO—MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE ............................................... $9,200 The President Air Force ...................................................... Qatar: AL UDEID—BLATCHFORD-PRESTON COMPLEX PH III ................................................................. $62,300 The President Def-Wide—NSA ........................................... Qatar: AL UDEID—QATAR WAREHOUSE ................................................................................................. $1,961 The President Navy ............................................................ Spain: ROTA—AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER ....................................................................................... $23,190 The President Air Force ...................................................... United Kingdom: RAF MILDENHALL—EXTEND TAXIWAY ALPHA ............................................................. $15,000 The President Def-Wide—DLA ........................................... United Kingdom: RAF MILDENHALL—RPL HYDRANT FUEL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM .............................. $15,900 The President Def-Wide—DODEA ...................................... United Kingdom: ROYAL AIR FORCE ALCONBURY—ALCONBURY ES REPLACEMENT ............................ $30,308 The President Def-Wide—NSA ........................................... United Kingdom: MENWITH HILL STATION—MHS PSC CONSTRUCTION—GENERATORS 10 & D11 ...... $2,000 The President Army Guard ................................................. Virgin Islands: ST. CROIX—READINESS CENTER [JFHQ] ....................................................................... $25,000 The President 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY AND FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION 

Army Family Housing Construction ............ Alaska: Fort Wainwright—Family Housing Replacement Construction ................................................ $21,000 The President 

Army Family Housing Construction ............ Germany: Baumholder—Family Housing Replacement Construction ................................................... $34,329 The President Army Construction Improvements ............... Pennsylvania: Carlisle Barracks—Family Housing Privatization .......................................................... $15,000 The President Army Construction Improvements ............... Virginia: Fort Eustis—Family Housing Privatization ............................................................................. $20,000 The President Navy Family Housing Construction ............. Cuba: Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay—Replace Base Housing, 71 Units at Various Sites ............. $37,169 The President Navy Family Construction Improvements ... Japan: CFA Sasebo—Revitalization of Family Housing Townhomes .................................................... $10,769 The President Navy Family Construction Improvements ... Japan: CFA Yokosuka—Revitalization of Family Housing Apartments ................................................. $17,479 The President Navy Family Construction Improvements ... California: MCB Camp Pendleton—Camp Pendleton PPV, Phase 8 .................................................... $26,748 The President Navy Family Construction Improvements ... Washington, D.C.: Marine Barracks 8th & I—Replace Interior Passenger Lift Quarters #6 ............... $100 The President Navy Family Construction Improvements ... North Carolina: Camp Lejeune—Camp Lejeune PPV Phase 7 with DODDS addition .......................... $79,908 The President Navy Family Construction Improvements ... Japan: Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni—Whole House Revitalization Midrise 906 .......................... $11,016 The President Air Force Family Construction Improvements. Japan: Kadena AB—Improve Family Housing, Phase 11 (403 units) .................................................. $73,800 The President 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 2005 

Defense-Wide—NGA ................................... Virginia: Fort Belvoir—NGA Headquarters Facility ................................................................................ $83,328 The President 

Defense-Wide—TMA ................................... Maryland: Bethesda [WRNMMC]—Traffic Mitigation, Increment 2 ...................................................... $7,600 The President Defense-Wide—TMA ................................... Maryland: Bethesda [WRNMMC]—Defense Access Roads—Medical Center Entrance ........................ $20,000 The President Defense-Wide—TMA ................................... Texas: Fort Sam Houston—San Antonio Military Medical Center—North, Increment 4 ...................... $93,941 The President Defense-Wide—TMA ................................... Virginia: Fort Belvoir—Hospital Replacement, Increment 5 ................................................................. $63,637 The President Defense-Wide—WHS ................................... Virginia: Fort Belvoir—Office Complex, Increment 4 ............................................................................ $5,610 The President 
123 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CONSTRUCTION, MAJOR PROJECTS 

Agency—Veterans Health Administration .. California: Palo Alto—Polytrauma/Ambulatory Care Replacement ....................................................... $30,000 The President, Senator Feinstein 

Agency—Veterans Health Administration .. California: Alameda Point—Outpatient Clinic and Columbarium (Design) ......................................... $17,332 The President, Senator Feinstein Agency—Veterans Health Administration .. Colorado: Denver—New Medical Facility ............................................................................................... $450,700 The President, Senators Michael Bennet and 

Mark Udall 

Agency—Veterans Health Administration .. Louisiana: New Orleans—New Medical Facility .................................................................................... $310,000 The President, Senator Landrieu Agency—Veterans Health Administration .. Nebraska: Omaha—Hospital Replacement Facility (Design) ................................................................ $56,000 The President, Senator Ben Nelson Agency—National Cemetery Administration. California: Los Angeles—Columbarium Expansion ............................................................................... $27,600 The President, Senator Feinstein Agency—National Cemetery Administration. Pennsylvania: Indiantown Gap—Gravesite Expansion and Cemetery Improvements—Phase 4 ......... $23,500 The President, Senators Specter and Casey Agency—National Cemetery Administration. Washington: Tahoma—Gravesite Expansion and Cemetery Improvements—Phase 2 ........................ $25,800 The President, Senator Murray 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—ARMY AVIATION HQ FACILITIES 1 .................................................... $19,000 The President 

Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—BARRACKS 1 .................................................................................... $18,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—C–IED TASK FORCE COMPOUND .................................................... $24,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—COMMAND & CONTROL FACILITY ................................................... $13,600 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY SUPPORT AREA 1 .............................. $14,800 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—DINING FACILITY ............................................................................. $6,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—EASTSIDE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION 1 .......................................... $10,400 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—EASTSIDE UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE 1 ........................................ $29,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—ENTRY CONTROL POINT 1 ............................................................... $7,500 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—JOINT DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER 1 ......................................... $2,800 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—MP HQ ............................................................................................ $5,580 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—REPLACE TEMPORARY GUARD TOWERS ......................................... $6,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—ROLE III HOSPITAL .......................................................................... $42,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—TASK FORCE FREEDOM COMPOUND ............................................... $18,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—TROOP HOUSING, PH 4 .................................................................. $23,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—TROOP HOUSING, PH 5 .................................................................. $29,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—TROOP HOUSING, PH 6 .................................................................. $29,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—TROOP HOUSING, PH 7 .................................................................. $29,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—TROOP HOUSING, PH 8 .................................................................. $29,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—VET CLINIC & KENNEL ................................................................... $2,600 The President Air Force ...................................................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—CONSOLIDATED RIGGING FACILITY 1 ............................................... $9,900 The President Air Force ...................................................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—FIGHTER HANGAR 1 ......................................................................... $16,480 The President Air Force ...................................................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE—MEDEVAC RAMP EXPANSION/FIRE STATION 1 ................................. $16,580 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: DWYER—COMMAND & CONTROL FACILITY ...................................................................... $5,200 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: DWYER—DINING FACILITY ................................................................................................ $9,000 The President 
124 

PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: DWYER—ROTARY WING APRON ....................................................................................... $44,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: DWYER—WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ................................................................. $16,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: FRONTENAC—WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPLEX ................................................................ $4,200 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: FRONTENAC—WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY .......................................................... $4,200 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: KANDAHAR—SOF JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER ................................................................. $6,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: KANDAHAR—TROOP HOUSING, PH 4 ............................................................................... $20,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: KANDAHAR—TROOP HOUSING, PH 5 ............................................................................... $20,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: KANDAHAR—TROOP HOUSING, PH 6 ............................................................................... $20,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: KANDAHAR—TROOP HOUSING, PH D7 ............................................................................. $20,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR—EXPAND CARGO HANDLING AREA ................................................................ $7,100 The President Air Force ...................................................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR—EXPEDITIONARY AIRLIFT SHELTER ............................................................... $7,400 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: MAYWAND—WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ............................................................. $7,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: SHANK—AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT .............................................................................. $23,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: SHANK—EXPAND ECP 1 AND ECP 2 ............................................................................... $9,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: SHANK—GUARD TOWERS ................................................................................................. $2,400 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: SHANK—ROADS AND UTILITIES, PH 1 ............................................................................. $25,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: SHARANA—BULK MATERIALS TRANSFER STATION ........................................................... $12,400 The President Air Force ...................................................... Afghanistan: SHINDAND—PASSENGER & CARGO TERMINAL ................................................................ $15,800 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: TARIN KOWT—ROTARY WING PARKING AND TAXIWAY, PH 2 ........................................... $24,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: TARIN KOWT—WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ......................................................... $4,200 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION—CONTINGENCY HOUSING ............................................................. $41,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION—DINING FACILITY ......................................................................... $27,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION—ROTARY WING PARKING ............................................................. $35,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION—WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ........................................... $13,000 The President Air Force ...................................................... Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION—EXPAND FUELS OPERATIONS AND STORAGE .............................. $2,500 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: VARIOUS LOCATIONS—ROUTE GYPSUM, PH 1 ................................................................. $49,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: WOLVERINE—ENTRY CONTROL POINT ............................................................................. $5,100 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: WOLVERINE—PERIMETER FENCE ..................................................................................... $5,100 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: WOLVERINE—ROTARY WING APRON ................................................................................ $24,000 The President Army ............................................................ Afghanistan: WOLVERINE—WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY .......................................................... $13,000 The President Def-Wide ..................................................... WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED—Classified Project ..................................................................................... $41,900 The President 

1 Projects requested in the fiscal year 2011 base Milcon budget. 
125 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Army Guard ................................................. Alabama: Fort McClellan—Live Fire Shoot House ................................................................................ $5,635 Senators Shelby and Sessions Air Guard .................................................... Alabama: Montgomery Regional Airport ANGB—Replace Squad Ops Facility ..................................... $7,500 Senators Shelby and Sessions Army ............................................................ Alaska: Fort Richardson—Physical Fitness Center [P&D] .................................................................... $2,700 Senators Begich and Murkowski Air Force ...................................................... Alaska: Elmendorf Air Force Base—DOD Joint Regional Fire Training Facility .................................... $6,600 Senators Begich and Murkowski Air Guard .................................................... Alaska: Eielson Air Force Base—Add/Alter Communications Facility .................................................. $6,500 Senators Begich and Murkowski Army Guard ................................................. Arkansas: Camp Robinson—Regional Training Institute, Ph 2 [P&D] ................................................. $1,900 Senators Pryor and Lincoln Army Guard ................................................. Arkansas: Fort Chafee—Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point Range .................................................. $3,500 Senators Pryor and Lincoln Air Guard .................................................... Arkansas: Little Rock Air Force Base—Fuel Cell and Corrosion Control Hanger ................................. $10,400 Senators Pryor and Lincoln Air Force ...................................................... California: Edwards AFB—Flightline Fire Station ................................................................................. $15,500 Senators Feinstein and Boxer Army Guard ................................................. California: Mather AASF—Renewable Photovoltaic Solar Power (Minor) .............................................. $1,466 Senators Feinstein and Boxer Army Guard ................................................. California: Ventura AFRC—Renewable Photovoltaic Solar Power (Minor) ............................................ $1,466 Senators Feinstein and Boxer Army Guard ................................................. California: Los Alamitos AFRC—Renewable Photovoltaic Solar Power (Minor) .................................... $1,466 Senators Feinstein and Boxer Army Guard ................................................. California: Banning RC—Renewable Photovoltaic Solar Power (Minor) ............................................... $1,466 Senators Feinstein and Boxer Air Force ...................................................... Colorado: Buckley Air Force Base—Land Acquisition ........................................................................... $10,000 Senators Mark Bennet and Mark Udall Navy ............................................................ Connecticut: NSB New London—Submarine Group Two Headquarters ................................................ $12,930 Senators Dodd and Lieberman Air Guard .................................................... Delaware: New Castle County Airport—C–130 Aircraft Maintenance Shops, Ph 3 ............................. $8,700 Senators Carper and Kaufman Navy ............................................................ Florida: NSA Panama City—Land Acquisition—9 acres ...................................................................... $5,960 Senator Bill Nelson Air Force ...................................................... Florida: Patrick Air Force Base—Relocate Main Gate .......................................................................... $8,000 Senator Bill Nelson Army ............................................................ Georgia: Fort Benning—Chapel, Sand Hill [P&D] ................................................................................. $550 Senator Chambliss Army ............................................................ Georgia: Fort Gordon—Qualification Training Range ........................................................................... $8,100 Senators Chambliss and Isakson Army ............................................................ Hawaii: Pohakuloa Training Area—Defense Access Road [P&D] ......................................................... $1,200 Senators Inouye and Akaka Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard—Welding School Shop Consolidation ....................................... $8,500 Senators Inouye and Akaka Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard—Fire Station, West Loch .......................................................... $9,084 Senators Inouye and Akaka Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: Pacific Missile Range Facility—Replace North Loop Electrical Distribution System .............. $9,100 Senators Inouye and Akaka Navy ............................................................ Hawaii: Pacific Missile Range Facility—Construct Prefabricated Bridge at Nohili Ditch ................... $3,560 Senators Inouye and Akaka Air Force ...................................................... Idaho: Mountain Home Air Force Base—Civil Engineer Maintenance Complex [P&D] ........................ $2,000 Senators Crapo and Risch Army Reserve .............................................. Illinois: Rockford USARC—United States Army Reserve Center ........................................................... $13,200 Senators Durbin and Burris Army Guard ................................................. Iowa: Camp Dodge—Combined Arms Collective Training Facility ....................................................... $5,700 Senators Harkin and Grassley Air Guard .................................................... Iowa: Bud Day Field—Add/Alt Security Police Facility (Minor) ............................................................. $1,950 Senator Harkin Air Guard .................................................... Iowa: Des Moines—Corrosion Control Hangar ...................................................................................... $4,700 Senators Harkin and Grassley Army Guard ................................................. Kansas: Forbes Field—Taxiway Alterations ........................................................................................... $9,036 Senators Brownback and Roberts Army ............................................................ Kentucky: Fort Campbell—Infantry Squad Battle Course ..................................................................... $3,000 Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: Fort Campbell—Shoot House ................................................................................................ $3,300 Senator McConnell Army ............................................................ Kentucky: Fort Knox—Rail Head Upgrade ............................................................................................. $18,000 Senator McConnell Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Kentucky: Fort Campbell—Landgraf Hangar Addition, 160th SOAR .................................................... $3,600 Senator Alexander 
126 

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS—Continued 

[Dollars in thousands] 

Account Project Funding Requestor 

Army ............................................................ Louisiana: Fort Polk—Emergency Services Center ................................................................................ $9,200 Senators Landrieu and Vitter Air Guard .................................................... Louisiana: NAS-Joint Reserve Base—Alert Facility [P&D] .................................................................... $2,000 Senator Landrieu Navy ............................................................ Maine: Portsmouth Naval Shipyard—Consolidation of Structural Shops ............................................. $17,240 Senators Collins, Snowe, Gregg and Shaheen Navy ............................................................ Maryland: Indian Head—Advanced Energetics Research Lab Complex, Ph 2 ..................................... $12,810 Senators Mikulski and Cardin Army Guard ................................................. Massachusetts: Chicopee Armory—Armory Addition (Minor) ................................................................ $1,554 Senator Kerry Air Guard .................................................... Massachusetts: Barnes Municipal Airport—Additions and Renovations to Building 15 ..................... $6,000 Senator Kerry Army Guard ................................................. Michigan: Camp Grayling Range—Barracks Replacement, Ph 2 ........................................................ $17,102 Senators Levin and Stabenow Army Guard ................................................. Michigan: Camp Grayling Range—Light Demolition Range ................................................................. $1,595 Senators Levin and Stabenow Air Guard .................................................... Michigan: Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center—Replace Troop Quarters, Ph 2 ...................... $9,600 Senators Levin and Stabenow Air Force ...................................................... Minnesota: Minneapolis—Simulation Facility Expansion (Minor) ......................................................... $1,900 Senators Franken and Klobuchar Army Guard ................................................. Minnesota: Bloomington—Add/Alt Armory (Minor) ................................................................................ $1,986 Senators Franken and Klobuchar Navy ............................................................ Mississippi: NCBC Gulfport—Branch Health Clinic .............................................................................. $11,870 Senators Cochran and Wicker Def-Wide—TMA .......................................... Mississippi: Gulfport—Health Clinic [P&D] .......................................................................................... $2,700 Senator Cochran Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Mississippi: Stennis Space Center—SOF Western Maneuver Area, Ph 2 ............................................. $9,000 Senators Cochran and Wicker Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... Mississippi: Stennis Space Center—SOF Western Maneuver Area, Ph 3 ............................................. $8,000 Senators Cochran and Wicker Army Guard ................................................. Missouri: Fort Leonard Wood—Regional Training Institute, Ph 1 ........................................................ $13,800 Senator Bond Air Force ...................................................... Montana: Malmstrom AFB—Physical Fitness Center, Ph 2 .................................................................. $8,000 Senators Tester and Baucus Air Force ...................................................... Nebraska: Offutt Air Force Base—Kenney/Bellevue Gates ................................................................... $11,000 Senator Ben Nelson Army Guard ................................................. Nebraska: Lincoln Airport—Road Infrastructure [P&D] ........................................................................ $240 Senator Ben Nelson Air Guard .................................................... Nebraska: Lincoln Airport—Road Infrastructure [P&D] ........................................................................ $210 Senator Ben Nelson Navy ............................................................ Nevada: NAS Fallon—NSAWC Security Upgrades (Minor) ..................................................................... $1,480 Senator Reid Air Force ...................................................... Nevada: Nellis Air Force Base—Facility Repair/Fitness Rec Center (Minor) ........................................ $867 Senator Reid Air Force ...................................................... Nevada: Nellis Air Force Base—Communication Network Control Center ............................................ $11,400 Senators Reid and Ensign Army Guard ................................................. Nevada: Nellis Air Force Base—CAT–M Range modernization (Minor) ................................................ $2,000 Senators Reid and Ensign Army Guard ................................................. Nevada: Las Vegas ARNG—Field Maintenance Shop ........................................................................... $22,998 Senators Reid and Ensign Air Guard .................................................... New Jersey: Atlantic City IAP—Fuel Cell Maintenance Dock and Corrosion Control Hangar .............. $8,500 Senators Lautenberg and Menendez Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: Cannon AFB—Family Support Center .............................................................................. $4,050 Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall Air Force ...................................................... New Mexico: Kirtland AFB—Military Working Dog Facility .................................................................... $4,400 Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall Army ............................................................ New York: Fort Drum—Construct Railhead Loading Area .................................................................... $7,600 Senators Schumer and Gillibrand Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... North Carolina: Fort Bragg—SOF Baffle Containment for Range 19C ................................................ $7,200 Senators Hagan and Burr Def-Wide—SOCOM ..................................... North Carolina: Fort Bragg—SOF Medical Clinic Addition ................................................................... $3,889 Senators Hagan and Burr Air Force ...................................................... North Dakota: Grand Forks AFB—Central Deployment Center ............................................................. $16,500 Senators Conrad and Dorgan Air Guard .................................................... Ohio: Blue Ash ANG—Renovate Building #2 (Minor) ........................................................................... $2,000 Senators Sherrod Brown and Voinovich Air Guard .................................................... Ohio: Toledo Airport—Replace Security Forces Complex ...................................................................... $7,300 Senators Sherrod Brown and Voinovich Air Force ...................................................... Oklahoma: Altus AFB—Fire Station [P&D] ............................................................................................ $2,000 Senator Inhofe 
127 

Air Force ...................................................... Oklahoma: Tinker AFB—Air Traffic Control Tower ................................................................................ $9,300 Senator Inhofe Air Guard .................................................... Oregon: Kingsley Field ANG Base, Klamath Falls—Replace Fire Station ............................................. $7,000 Senators Wyden and Merkley Navy ............................................................ Pennsylvania: Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg—North Gate Security Improvements ............... $5,930 Senators Specter and Casey Navy ............................................................ Pennsylvania: Philadelphia Annex—Quiet Propulsion Load House ....................................................... $7,630 Senators Specter and Casey Navy ............................................................ Rhode Island: Newport—Submarine Payloads Integration Laboratory ................................................. $12,170 Senator Reed Navy ............................................................ Rhode Island: Newport—Gate Improvements ....................................................................................... $4,950 Senator Reed Army Guard ................................................. Rhode Island: Quonset State Airport—Battalion Readiness Center [P&D] .......................................... $3,729 Senator Reed Army Guard ................................................. Rhode Island: Middletown Armory—Armory Addition [P&D] ................................................................. $302 Senator Reed Air Guard .................................................... Rhode Island: Quonset State Airport—C–130 Parking Apron .............................................................. $1,800 Senator Reed Air Guard .................................................... South Carolina: McEntire JRB—Joint Deployment Processing and Readiness Center, Ph 1 ............... $9,100 Senator Graham Air Force ...................................................... South Dakota: Ellsworth AFB—Maintenance Training Facility ............................................................. $12,400 Senators Johnson and Thune Army Guard ................................................. South Dakota: Sioux Falls—Firing Range and Supporting Facilities [P&D] ........................................ $151 Senators Johnson and Thune Air Guard .................................................... South Dakota: Joe Foss Field—Aircraft Maintenance Shops ................................................................ $12,800 Senators Johnson and Thune Air Guard .................................................... Tennessee: McGhee Tyson Air National Guard Base—Hobbs Road Acquisition .................................. $6,500 Senator Alexander Air Force ...................................................... Texas: Randolph AFB—Fire Crash Rescue Station ............................................................................... $13,000 Senators Hutchison and Cornyn Army Reserve .............................................. Texas: Fort Hood—Army Reserve Center ............................................................................................... $15,500 Senator Hutchison Air Force ...................................................... Utah: Hill Air Force Base—Consolidated Transportation Facilities, Ph 1 ............................................ $7,300 Senators Bob Bennett and Hatch Air Guard .................................................... Vermont: Burlington International Airport—Upgrade Taxiways and Replace Arm/Disarm Pads, 

Ph 1.

$11,000 Senators Leahy and Sanders 

Navy ............................................................ Virginia: Dahlgren NSCW—Missile Support Facility Replacement, Ph 1 ............................................. $9,730 Senators Webb and Warner Air Force ...................................................... Washington: Fairchild AFB—Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory Facility .......................... $4,850 Senator Murray Air Force ...................................................... Washington: McChord AFB—Collocated Chapel/Family Support Center, Ph 1 .................................... $10,400 Senator Murray Army Guard ................................................. Washington: Fort Lewis—Modification of Aviation Support Facility [P&D] .......................................... $473 Senators Murray and Cantwell Army Guard ................................................. West Virginia: Eleanor ARNG Complex—Emergency Generator (Minor) ................................................ $2,000 Senator Rockefeller Army Guard ................................................. West Virginia: Camp Dawson—Mail/ID Center (Minor) ........................................................................ $1,990 Senator Rockefeller Army Guard ................................................. West Virginia: Camp Dawson—Utility Upgrade (Minor) ....................................................................... $1,980 Senator Rockefeller Army Guard ................................................. West Virginia: Camp Dawson—JITEC Emergency Power Generation (Minor) ....................................... $1,999 Senator Rockefeller Army Guard ................................................. West Virginia: Morgantown—Parachute Rigging Facility [P&D] .......................................................... $1,000 Senator Rockefeller Army Guard ................................................. West Virginia: Buckhannon—Field Maintenance Shop [P&D] .............................................................. $1,500 Senator Rockefeller Air Guard .................................................... West Virginia: Yeager Airbase—Force Protection/Antiterrorism ............................................................ $13,000 Senator Rockefeller Air Guard .................................................... West Virginia: Yeager Airbase—Communications Training Facility ..................................................... $6,250 Senator Rockefeller Air Guard .................................................... Wisconsin: General Mitchell IAP—Replace Fire Station ....................................................................... $8,300 Senator Kohl 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CONSTRUCTION MAJOR PROJECTS 

Agency—Veterans Health Administration .. West Virginia: Beckley—Nursing Home Care Unit ................................................................................ 46,550 Senator Inouye 
128 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2010 appropriation Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Senate Committee recommendation 

compared with (∂ or ¥) 

2010 

appropriation Budget estimate 

TITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Military construction, Army .................................................................................................................................................. 3,719,419 4,078,798 3,797,521 ∂78,102 ¥281,277 Military construction, Navy and Marine Corps .................................................................................................................... 3,769,003 3,879,104 3,667,922 ¥101,081 ¥211,182 Military construction, Air Force ............................................................................................................................................ 1,450,426 1,311,385 1,378,688 ¥71,738 ∂67,303 

Rescission .................................................................................................................................................................... ¥37,500 .......................... .......................... ∂37,500 ..........................

Total ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1,412,926 1,311,385 1,378,688 ¥34,238 ∂67,303 

Military construction, Defense-Wide ..................................................................................................................................... 3,093,679 3,118,062 3,241,601 ∂147,922 ∂123,539 

Rescission .................................................................................................................................................................... ¥151,160 .......................... .......................... ∂151,160 ..........................

Total ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,942,519 3,118,062 3,241,601 ∂299,082 ∂123,539 Total, Active components ........................................................................................................................................ 11,843,867 12,387,349 12,085,732 ∂241,865 ¥301,617 

Military construction, Army National Guard ......................................................................................................................... 582,056 873,664 980,072 ∂398,016 ∂106,408 Military construction, Air National Guard ............................................................................................................................ 371,226 176,986 337,454 ¥33,772 ∂160,468 Military construction, Army Reserve ..................................................................................................................................... 431,566 318,175 347,916 ¥83,650 ∂29,741 Military construction, Navy Reserve ..................................................................................................................................... 125,874 61,557 61,557 ¥64,317 ..........................Military construction, Air Force Reserve .............................................................................................................................. 112,269 7,832 12,832 ¥99,437 ∂5,000 

Total, Reserve components ..................................................................................................................................... 1,622,991 1,438,214 1,739,831 ∂116,840 ∂301,617 Total, Military construction ..................................................................................................................................... 13,466,858 13,825,563 13,825,563 ∂358,705 ..........................

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (13,655,518 ) (13,825,563 ) (13,825,563 ) (∂170,045 ) ..........................Rescissions .................................................................................................................................................... (¥188,660 ) .......................... .......................... (∂188,660 ) ..........................Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program ....................................................................................... 197,414 258,884 258,884 ∂61,470 ..........................Family housing construction, Army ...................................................................................................................................... 273,236 92,369 92,369 ¥180,867 ..........................
129 

Family housing operation and maintenance, Army ............................................................................................................. 523,418 518,140 518,140 ¥5,278 ..........................Family housing construction, Navy and Marine Corps ........................................................................................................ 146,569 186,444 186,444 ∂39,875 ..........................Family housing operation and maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps ............................................................................... 368,540 366,346 366,346 ¥2,194 ..........................Family housing construction, Air Force ................................................................................................................................ 66,101 78,025 78,025 ∂11,924 ..........................Family housing operation and maintenance, Air Force ....................................................................................................... 502,936 513,792 513,792 ∂10,856 ..........................Family housing construction, Defense-Wide ........................................................................................................................ 2,859 .......................... .......................... ¥2,859 ..........................Family housing operation and maintenance, Defense-Wide ............................................................................................... 49,214 50,464 50,464 ∂1,250 ..........................Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund ............................................................................................... 2,600 1,096 1,096 ¥1,504 ..........................Homeowners assistance fund .............................................................................................................................................. 323,225 16,515 16,515 ¥306,710 ..........................

Total, Family housing ............................................................................................................................................. 2,258,698 1,823,191 1,823,191 ¥435,507 ..........................

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (2,258,698 ) (1,823,191 ) (1,823,191 ) (¥435,507 ) ..........................Rescissions .................................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

Chemical demilitarization construction, Defense-Wide ....................................................................................................... 151,541 124,971 124,971 ¥26,570 ..........................Base realignment and closure: 

Base realignment and closure account, 1990 ........................................................................................................... 496,768 360,474 360,474 ¥136,294 ..........................Base realignment and closure account, 2005 ........................................................................................................... 7,455,498 2,354,285 2,354,285 ¥5,101,213 ..........................

Total ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7,455,498 2,354,285 2,354,285 ¥5,101,213 ..........................Total, Base realignment and closure ..................................................................................................................... 7,952,266 2,714,759 2,714,759 ¥5,237,507 ..........................

General Reductions (Sec. 129): 

Military Construction, Army ......................................................................................................................................... ¥230,000 .......................... .......................... ∂230,000 ..........................Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ........................................................................................................... ¥235,000 .......................... .......................... ∂235,000 ..........................Military Construction, Air Force ................................................................................................................................... ¥64,091 .......................... .......................... ∂64,091 ..........................

General Rescissions (Secs 130): 

Military Construction, Army ......................................................................................................................................... ¥33,000 .......................... .......................... ∂33,000 ..........................Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ........................................................................................................... ¥51,468 .......................... .......................... ∂51,468 ..........................Military Construction, Defense-Wide ........................................................................................................................... ¥93,268 .......................... .......................... ∂93,268 ..........................Military Construction, Army National Guard ............................................................................................................... ¥33,000 .......................... .......................... ∂33,000 ..........................Military Construction, Air National Guard ................................................................................................................... ¥7,000 .......................... .......................... ∂7,000 ..........................

Total, title I ............................................................................................................................................................. 23,279,950 18,747,368 18,747,368 ¥4,532,582 ..........................

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (23,686,346 ) (18,747,368 ) (18,747,368 ) (¥4,938,978 ) ..........................Rescissions .................................................................................................................................................... (¥406,396 ) .......................... .......................... (∂406,396 ) ..........................Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................
130 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2010 appropriation Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Senate Committee recommendation 

compared with (∂ or ¥) 

2010 

appropriation Budget estimate 

TITLE II—DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

Veterans Benefits Administration 

Compensation and pensions ................................................................................................................................................ 47,396,106 53,492,234 53,492,234 ∂6,096,128 ..........................Readjustment benefits ......................................................................................................................................................... 9,232,369 10,440,245 10,440,245 ∂1,207,876 ..........................Veterans insurance and indemnities ................................................................................................................................... 49,288 62,589 62,589 ∂13,301 ..........................Veterans housing benefit program fund (indefinite) ........................................................................................................... 23,553 19,078 19,078 ¥4,475 ..........................

(Limitation on direct loans) ........................................................................................................................................ (500 ) (500 ) (500 ) .......................... ..........................Credit subsidy ............................................................................................................................................................. ¥133,000 ¥165,000 ¥165,000 ¥32,000 ..........................Administrative expenses .............................................................................................................................................. 165,082 163,646 163,646 ¥1,436 ..........................

Guaranteed Transitional Housing Loans for Homeless Veterans ........................................................................................ (750 ) .......................... .......................... (¥750 ) ..........................Vocational rehabilitation loans program account ............................................................................................................... 29 48 48 ∂19 ..........................

(Limitation on direct loans) ........................................................................................................................................ (2,298 ) (3,042 ) (3,042 ) (∂744 ) ..........................Administrative expenses .............................................................................................................................................. 328 337 337 ∂9 ..........................

Native American veteran housing loan program account ................................................................................................... 664 707 707 ∂43 ..........................

Total, Veterans Benefits Administration ................................................................................................................. 56,734,419 64,013,884 64,013,884 ∂7,279,465 ..........................

Veterans Health Administration 

Medical services ................................................................................................................................................................... 34,707,500 .......................... 100,000 ¥34,607,500 ∂100,000 

Advance from prior year .............................................................................................................................................. .......................... (37,136,000 ) (37,136,000 ) (∂37,136,000 ) ..........................Advance appropriation, fiscal year 2012 .................................................................................................................... 37,136,000 39,649,985 39,649,985 ∂2,513,985 ..........................

Subtotal ................................................................................................................................................................... 71,843,500 39,649,985 39,749,985 ¥32,093,515 ∂100,000 

Medical support and compliance ......................................................................................................................................... 4,930,000 .......................... .......................... ¥4,930,000 ..........................

Advance from prior year .............................................................................................................................................. .......................... (5,307,000 ) (5,307,000 ) (∂5,307,000 ) ..........................
131 

Advance appropriation, fiscal year 2012 .................................................................................................................... 5,307,000 5,535,000 5,535,000 ∂228,000 ..........................

Subtotal ................................................................................................................................................................... 10,237,000 5,535,000 5,535,000 ¥4,702,000 ..........................

Medical facilities .................................................................................................................................................................. 4,859,000 .......................... 20,000 ¥4,839,000 ∂20,000 

Advance from prior year .............................................................................................................................................. .......................... (5,740,000 ) (5,740,000 ) (∂5,740,000 ) ..........................Advance appropriation, fiscal year 2012 .................................................................................................................... 5,740,000 5,426,000 5,426,000 ¥314,000 ..........................

Subtotal ................................................................................................................................................................... 10,599,000 5,426,000 5,446,000 ¥5,153,000 ∂20,000 

Medical and prosthetic research ......................................................................................................................................... 581,000 590,000 590,000 ∂9,000 ..........................Medical care cost recovery collections: 

Offsetting collections .................................................................................................................................................. ¥2,954,000 ¥3,393,000 ¥3,393,000 ¥439,000 ..........................Appropriations (indefinite) .......................................................................................................................................... 2,954,000 3,393,000 3,393,000 ∂439,000 ..........................

Total, Veterans Health Administration ................................................................................................................... 93,260,500 51,200,985 51,320,985 ¥41,939,515 ∂120,000 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (45,077,500 ) (590,000 ) (710,000 ) (¥44,367,500 ) (∂120,000 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Advance from prior year ................................................................................................................................ .......................... (48,183,000 ) (48,183,000 ) (∂48,183,000 ) ..........................Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2012 .................................................................................................... (48,183,000 ) (50,610,985 ) (50,610,985 ) (∂2,427,985 ) ..........................

National Cemetery Administration 

National Cemetery Administration ....................................................................................................................................... 250,000 250,504 250,504 ∂504 ..........................

Departmental Administration 

General operating expenses ................................................................................................................................................. 2,086,707 2,588,389 .......................... ¥2,086,707 ¥2,588,389 General operating expenses, VBA ........................................................................................................................................ .......................... .......................... 2,148,776 ∂2,148,776 ∂2,148,776 General administration ......................................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... 439,613 ∂439,613 ∂439,613 Information technology systems ........................................................................................................................................... 3,307,000 3,307,000 3,147,000 ¥160,000 ¥160,000 Office of Inspector General .................................................................................................................................................. 109,000 109,367 111,867 ∂2,867 ∂2,500 Construction, major projects ................................................................................................................................................ 1,194,000 1,151,036 1,197,586 ∂3,586 ∂46,550 Construction, minor projects ................................................................................................................................................ 703,000 467,700 485,965 ¥217,035 ∂18,265 Grants for construction of State extended care facilities ................................................................................................... 100,000 85,000 85,000 ¥15,000 ..........................Grants for the construction of State veterans cemeteries .................................................................................................. 46,000 46,000 46,000 .......................... ..........................

Total, Departmental Administration ....................................................................................................................... 7,545,707 7,754,492 7,661,807 ∂116,100 ¥92,685 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (7,545,707 ) (7,754,492 ) (7,661,807 ) (∂116,100 ) (¥92,685 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................
132 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2010 appropriation Budget estimate Committee recommendation 

Senate Committee recommendation 

compared with (∂ or ¥) 

2010 

appropriation Budget estimate 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 

Sec 229—General operating expenses, VBA ....................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... 23,584 ∂23,584 ∂23,584 

Total, title II ............................................................................................................................................................ 157,790,626 123,219,865 123,270,764 ¥34,519,862 ∂50,899 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (109,607,626 ) (72,608,880 ) (72,659,779 ) (¥36,947,847 ) (∂50,899 ) Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Advance from prior year ................................................................................................................................ .......................... (48,183,000 ) (48,183,000 ) (∂48,183,000 ) ..........................Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2012 .................................................................................................... (48,183,000 ) (50,610,985 ) (50,610,985 ) (∂2,427,985 ) ..........................(Limitation on direct loans) ........................................................................................................................... (2,798 ) (3,542 ) (3,542 ) (∂744 ) ..........................Discretionary .................................................................................................................................................. (101,222,310 ) (59,370,719 ) (59,421,618 ) (¥41,800,692 ) (∂50,899 ) Mandatory ...................................................................................................................................................... (56,568,316 ) (63,849,146 ) (63,849,146 ) (∂7,280,830 ) ..........................

TITLE III—RELATED AGENCIES 

American Battle Monuments Commission 

Salaries and expenses ......................................................................................................................................................... 62,675 64,200 67,200 ∂4,525 ∂3,000 Foreign currency fluctuations account ................................................................................................................................. 17,100 20,200 20,200 ∂3,100 ..........................

Total, American Battle Monuments Commission ................................................................................................... 79,775 84,400 87,400 ∂7,625 ∂3,000 

U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

Salaries and expenses ......................................................................................................................................................... 27,115 90,147 53,297 ∂26,182 ¥36,850 

Department of Defense—Civil 

Cemeterial Expenses, Army 

Salaries and expenses ......................................................................................................................................................... 39,850 38,100 43,100 ∂3,250 ∂5,000 

Armed Forces Retirement Home 

Operation and maintenance ................................................................................................................................................. 62,000 69,200 69,200 ∂7,200 ..........................
133 

Capital program ................................................................................................................................................................... 72,000 2,000 2,000 ¥70,000 ..........................

Total, Armed Forces Retirement Home ................................................................................................................... 134,000 71,200 71,200 ¥62,800 ..........................Total, title III ........................................................................................................................................................... 280,740 283,847 254,997 ¥25,743 ¥28,850 

(By transfer) ................................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................

TITLE IV—OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

Military Construction, Army .................................................................................................................................................. 924,484 929,996 1,045,676 ∂121,192 ∂115,680 Military Construction, Air Force ............................................................................................................................................ 474,500 280,506 164,826 ¥309,674 ¥115,680 Military Construction, Defense-Wide .................................................................................................................................... .......................... 46,500 46,500 ∂46,500 ..........................

Total, title IV ........................................................................................................................................................... 1,398,984 1,257,002 1,257,002 ¥141,982 ..........................

TITLE V—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

General operating expenses ................................................................................................................................................. .......................... 23,584 .......................... .......................... ¥23,584 

Total, title V ............................................................................................................................................................ .......................... 23,584 .......................... .......................... ¥23,584 Grand total .............................................................................................................................................................. 182,750,300 143,531,666 143,530,131 ¥39,220,169 ∂1,535 

Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................ (133,574,712 ) (91,663,679 ) (91,662,144 ) (¥41,912,568 ) (∂1,535 ) Rescissions .................................................................................................................................................... (¥406,396 ) .......................... .......................... (∂406,396 ) ..........................Emergency appropriations ............................................................................................................................. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................Advance from prior year ................................................................................................................................ .......................... (48,183,000 ) (48,183,000 ) (∂48,183,000 ) ..........................Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2012 .................................................................................................... (48,183,000 ) (50,610,985 ) (50,610,985 ) (∂2,427,985 ) ..........................Overseas contingency operations .................................................................................................................. (1,398,984 ) (1,257,002 ) (1,257,002 ) (¥141,982 ) ..........................(By transfer) ................................................................................................................................................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ..........................(Limitation on direct loans) ........................................................................................................................... (2,798 ) (3,542 ) (3,542 ) (∂744 ) ..........................

Æ