alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
227.7102-1 Policy. ( a ) DoD shall acquire only the technical data customarily provided to the public with a commercial product, commercial service, or commercial process, except technical data that— ( 1 ) Are form, fit, or function data;
( 2 ) Are required for repair or maintenance of commercial products or commercial processes, or for the proper installation, operating, or handling of a commercial product, either as a stand alone unit or as a part of a military system, when such data are not customarily provided to commercial users or the data provided to commercial users is not sufficient for military purposes; or
( 3 ) Describe the modifications made at Government expense to a commercial product, commercial service, or commercial process in order to meet the requirements of a Government solicitation.
( b ) To encourage offerors and contractors to offer or use commercial products to satisfy military requirements, offerors, and contractors shall not be required, except for the technical data described in paragraph (a) of this section, to— ( 1 ) Furnish technical information related to commercial products, commercial services, or commercial processes that is not customarily provided to the public; or
( 2 ) Relinquish to, or otherwise provide, the Government rights to use, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display, or disclose technical data pertaining to commercial products, commercial services, or commercial processes except for a transfer of rights mutually agreed upon.
( c ) The Government's rights in a vessel design, and in any useful article embodying a vessel design, must be consistent with the Government's rights in technical data pertaining to the design (10 U.S.C. 8687; 17 U.S.C. 1301(a)(3)).
[60 FR 33471, June 28, 1995, as amended at 74 FR 61044, Nov. 23, 2009; 87 FR 15818, Mar. 18, 2022; 88 FR 6585, Jan. 31, 2023]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PETER MANUEL CANDELARIA,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00009

- CR

Appeal from the

118th District Court

of Howard County, Texas

(TC#15,558)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the judgment of

conviction should be reformed to reflect T EX .P ENAL C ODE A NN

. § 22.02(b)(2)(B. We therefore

affirm the judgment of the trial court as reformed, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD OF APRIL, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
#### 28.200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes procedures for the use of sureties and other security to protect the Government from financial losses.

[62 FR 44807, Aug. 22, 1997]
# Fourth Court of Ap **peals San Antonio, Texas** 

March 27, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00131

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.S.

,
From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 02761 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In this accelerated appeal of an order terminating Appellant’s parental rights, t he reporter’s record was due to be filed with this court on February 17, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1(b).

On March 5, 2014, after no reporter’s record was filed, we notified court reporter David R. Zarate that the record was late, and ordered him to file a notification of late record not later than March 10, 2014, or to fil e the record by March 17, 2014. After no response was received, on March 21, 2014, we ordered David R. Zarate to file the record by March 31, 2014, or we would order him to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the
record.

On March 26, 2014, David R. Zarate filed the reporter’ s record in this appeal. Our March 21, 2014 order is satisfied. Appellant’s brief is due on April 15, 2014. See id. R. 38.6(a).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on t his 27th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
#### Robert Fenson, Respondent, v. Martha Fox, Appellant.

In a negligence action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 28, 1963, which granted plaintiff’s motion to increase the *ad danmum*clause from $6,000 to $100,000 and to transfer the cause from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, to the Supreme Court. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion denied; and action remitted to the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. In our opinion, on all the facts presented, the granting of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Dear Ms. Flattery and/or Mr. Barone:

I understand, based on information recently publish ed on the EPA website as shown below ( http://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm ?downloadID=507731) that EPA anticipates issuing a draft risk assessmen t for N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) for public review a nd comment once it is completed. Since this is a c hemical substance used at our facility (DuPont Spruance Pla nt, Richmond, Va.), we are very interested in recei ving the draft risk assessment for this material fo r our review and
possible comment.

Could you please let me know as soon as the draft r isk assessment for NMP is issued and available for comment?

Thanks! Inquiry Regarding Risk Assessment - N-Methylpyrrolid one (NMP)

Joe G Loschiavo

to: Priscilla Flattery, Stan Barone

08/29/2012 10:48 AM

Cc:

Joe G Loschiavo

Hide Details From: Joe G Loschiavo <Joe.G.Loschiavo-1@usa.dupont.c om>

To: Priscilla Flattery/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Stan Barone/DC/USE PA/US@EPA

Cc: Joe G Loschiavo <Joe.G.Loschiavo-1@usa.dupont.com >

History: This message has been replied to. 

## Page 1 of 2

10/11/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\sbarone\Local Sett ings\Temp\notes87944B\~web4159.h

...This communication is for use by the intended recip ient and contains

information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipie nt, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribu tion of this e-mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your syst em. Unless explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intende d", this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendme nt, or an acceptance
of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitut e a consent to the

use of sender's contact information for direct mark eting purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.

Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japan ese Chinese Korean

http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html 

## Page 2 of 2

10/11/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\sbarone\Local Sett ings\Temp\notes87944B\~web4159.h

...
Dear Ms. Flattery and/or Mr. Barone: 

I understand, based on information recently published on the EPA website as shown below (http://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?downloadID=507731)

that EPA anticipates issuing a draft risk assessment for N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) for public review and comment once it is completed. Since this is a chemical 

substance used at our facility (DuPont Spruance Plant, Richmond, Va.), we are very interested in receiving the draft risk assessment for this material for our review and 

possible comment. 

Could you please let me know as soon as the draft risk assessment for NMP is issued and available for comment? 

Thanks! 

 

Inquiry Regarding Risk Assessment - N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP) 

Joe G Loschiavo 

to: 

Priscilla Flattery, Stan Barone 

08/29/2012 10:48 AM 

Cc: 

Joe G Loschiavo 

Hide Details 

From: Joe G Loschiavo <Joe.G.Loschiavo-1@usa.dupont.com> 

To: Priscilla Flattery/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Stan Barone/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Joe G Loschiavo <Joe.G.Loschiavo-1@usa.dupont.com> 

History: This message has been replied to. 

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\sbarone\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web4159.h... 10/11/2012
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains 

information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under 

applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 

formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail, 

in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by 

return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless explicitly 

and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this e-mail does 

not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance 

of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent to the 

use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for 

transfers of data to third parties. 

Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japanese Chinese Korean 

 http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\sbarone\Local Settings\Temp\notes87944B\~web4159.h... 10/11/2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT FOR ILLINOIS

Power Vanguard Ltd., Brian Pannkuk, 

Jordan Robinson, Paul Lagudi, Patricia 

Benvenuto, OE Technical Services, 

Courtney May, and Werner Stapelfeldt,

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs.

Russell R. Wasendorf, Sr., Russell R. 

Wasendorf, Jr., Neil J. Aslin, Brenda 

Cuypers, Susan O’Meara, Veraja-Snelling 

Company, Jeannie Veraja-Snelling, and 

John Does 1-10,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No: 12-cv-05727

Hon. Joan B. Gotschall

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION

Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, Michael H. Moirano and Claire Gorman Kenny, 

hereby voluntarily withdraw their Motion For Reassignment of Related Case (Docket #6),

without prejudice. 

/s/ Claire Gorman Kenny 

One of Plaintiff’s attorneys

Michael H. Moirano

Claire Gorman-Kenny

Nisen & Elliott

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

(312)346-7800

Case: 1:12-cv-05727 Document #: 12 Filed: 07/31/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:175
#### 252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium.

As prescribed in 223.7306, use the following clause:

# Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium (JAN 2023)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Homogeneous material* means a material that cannot be mechanically disjointed into different materials and is of uniform composition throughout.

(1) Examples of homogeneous materials include individual types of plastics, ceramics, glass, metals, alloys, paper, board, resins, and surface coatings.

(2) Homogeneous material does not include conversion coatings that chemically modify the substrate. *Mechanically disjointed* means that the materials can, in principle, be separated by mechanical actions such as unscrewing, cutting, crushing, grinding, and abrasive processes.

(b) *Prohibition.* (1) Unless otherwise specified by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall not provide any deliverable or construction material under this contract that—

(i) Contains hexavalent chromium in a concentration greater than 0.1 percent by weight in any homogenous material; or

(ii) Requires the removal or reapplication of hexavalent chromium materials during subsequent sustainment phases of the deliverable or construction material.

(2) This prohibition does not apply to hexavalent chromium produced as a by-product of manufacturing processes.

(c) If authorization for incorporation of hexavalent chromium in a deliverable or construction material is required, the Contractor shall submit a request to the Contracting Officer.

(d) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (d), in all subcontracts, including subcontracts for commercial products or commercial services, that are for supplies, maintenance and repair services, or construction materials.

(End of clause)

[76 FR 25576, May 5, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 37990, June 25, 2013; 88 FR 6591, Jan. 31, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 215 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 215

   Designating July 14, 2017, as Collector Car Appreciation Day and 
recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic and classic 
cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements 
              and cultural heritage of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2017

     Mr. Burr (for himself and Mr. Tester) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating July 14, 2017, as Collector Car Appreciation Day and 
recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic and classic 
cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements 
              and cultural heritage of the United States.

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic automobiles as a 
        pastime and do so with great passion and as a means of individual 
        expression;
Whereas the Senate recognizes the effect that the more than 100-year history of 
        the automobile has had on the economic progress of the United States and 
        supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restoration and 
        exhibition of classic automobiles;
Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an 
        activity shared across generations and across all segments of society;
Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses have been 
        instrumental in preserving a historic part of the heritage of the United 
        States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage 
        works of art;
Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, high-skilled jobs for 
        people in all 50 States; and
Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, photography, 
        cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits that have become part of 
        the popular culture of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 14, 2017, as ``Collector Car 
        Appreciation Day'';
            (2) recognizes that the collection and restoration of 
        historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving 
        the technological achievements and cultural heritage of the 
        United States; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to engage in 
        events and commemorations of Collector Car Appreciation Day 
        that create opportunities for collector car owners to educate 
        young people about the importance of preserving the cultural 
        heritage of the United States, including through the collection 
        and restoration of collector cars.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017388EN.01000501.xml

| 17.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 November 2017

(2017/C 388/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1771 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89183 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8868 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1686 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6553 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,559 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,52 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2340 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6390 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5465 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5507 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5025 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,1919 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7204 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5971 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 291,59 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8050 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8065 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5663 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 919,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9148 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,786 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,4460 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,797 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8579 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,5323 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,8910 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1771

JPY

Japanese yen

133,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89183

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8868

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1686

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6553

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,559

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,52

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2340

RON

Romanian leu

4,6390

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5465

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5507

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5025

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,1919

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7204

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5971

KRW

South Korean won

1 291,59

ZAR

South African rand

16,8050

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8065

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5663

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 919,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9148

PHP

Philippine peso

59,786

RUB

Russian rouble

70,4460

THB

Thai baht

38,797

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8579

MXN

Mexican peso

22,5323

INR

Indian rupee

76,8910

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
RowMidwestGenerationSO2Emissions‐2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Totals1CPSemissionrates(lb/mmBtu)0.44 0.41 0.28 0.1952SO2emissionswithCPSbusinessasusual(tons)265,34160,88637,69926,255190,1813 VarianceCPSemissionrates(lb/mmBtu)0.44 0.41 0.38 0.384SO2emissionswithvarianceCPSemissionrates(tons)365,34160,88651,16351,1635SO2massemissionlevellimitsunderthevariance(tons) 57,00054,00039,00037,000187,0006ReductionsbeyondwhatisrequiredbyCPSattributabletoFiskshutdownin2012(tons)734 3,7813,7813,7817ReductionsbeyondwhatisrequiredbyCPSattributabletoCrawfordshutdownin2012(tons)41,2495,9615,9615,9615,9615,9612,6028EmissionsincreaseatWaukeganunit7duevariance(tons)2,9579SO2emissionswithvarianceCPSemissionrates(row4)minusreductionsnotrequiredbyCPS(rows6&7)plusemissionsincreaseduetovariance(row8)(tons)55,59954,10141,42145,20210Emissionsexpectedundervariances(lowerofrow5orrow9)(tons)55,59954,00039,00037,000185,59911ExcessemissionsreductionsundervarianceduetoearlyshutdownofFisk&Crawfordin2012(tons)1,9835,9612,60210,5465,961+2,602=8,56312DifferencebetweenemissionsexpectedundervarianceandCPS"businessasusual"emissionsforthe2013‐2016timeperiod(tons)(row2total‐row10total)4,58213DifferencebetweenemissionsexpectedundervarianceandCPSbusinessasusualemissions(tons)(‐row11foryears2012,2017&2018androw10‐row2foryears2013‐2016)‐1,983‐9,742‐6,886 1,301 10,745‐5,961‐2,602‐15,12914Totalcumulativedifference(tons)‐1,983‐11,725‐18,611‐17,310‐6,565‐12,527‐15,129MidwestGenerationSO2Emissions11GeneratedbyEPAusingdatafoundinAttachment1,Exhibit5ofIEPA'sAugust18,2014submittalandAttachment1,Exhibit9ofIEPA'sMay16,2013submittal3Basedonaverage2008‐2011heatinputfortheunitslegallypermittedtooperatein2013‐2016,respectively,andthevarianceCPSemissionrates(row3)3NotethatExhibit9ofAttachment1toIEPA'sMay16,2013submittalshows2015‐2018emissionsfromCrawfordof23,845tons(5961tonsperyearfromunits7and8).However,whiletheCPSdoesn'trequireunit7toinstallanFGDorshutdownuntil12/31/2018,theCPSrequiresthatunit8installanFGDorshutdownby12/31/2017.Therefore,inthistablethereductionsweredividedbyyearandnoemissionreductionwasassumedforunit8in2018.2Basedonaverage2008‐2011heatinputfortheunitslegallypermittedtooperatein2013‐2016,respectively,andtheemissionratesallowedundertheoriginalCPS(row1)12/15/20142012 2103 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 TotalProjectedPMemissionsatWaukegan7in2014withoutvariance(tons)140ProjectedPMemissionsatWaukegan7in2014withvariance(tons)157IncreaseinexpectedemissionsatWaukegan7in2014duetovariance(tons)17EstimatedreductionsatFiskandCrawfordwithvariance(shutdown)(tons)22991579 1579 1579 884884345ReductionsinPMemissionswithvariance(tons)2991,5791,5621,5798848843457,131MidwestGenerationPMEmissions11GeneratedbyEPAusingdatafoundinAttachment1,Exhibit9ofIEPA'sMay16,2013submittal2NotethatExhibit9ofAttachment1toIEPA'sMay16,2013submittalshows2015‐2018emissionsfromCrawfordof3,536tons(884tonsperyearfromunits7and8).However,whiletheCPSdoesn'trequireunit7toinstallanFGDorshutdownuntil12/31/2018,theCPSrequiresthatunit8installanFGDorshutdownby12/31/2017.Therefore,inthistablethereductionsweredividedbyyearand12/15/14
3800

3850

3600

3600

3650

3850

3800

3750

3800

3800

3700 3700

3650

3600

3550

3650

10

10

20

20

20

S O T O R D

M A S E D O S

I- 10

W

A C A L A R D

A L A M O L A K E R D

A C A L A R D

10

10

20

20

20

S O T O R D

M A S E D O S

I- 10

W

A C A L A R D

A L A M O L A K E R D

A C A L A R D

RIVER DRAIN

DAVIS

LATERAL

RIVER DRIAN

UPPER DRAIN

RIVER DRAIN

COOKE DRAIN

UPPER

DRIAN

Rio Grande

Rio Grande

Alamo

Arroyo

UNITED

STATES

OF

AMERICA

ESTADOS

UNIDOS

MEXICANOS

Iser

Acala

McCaskills

Crossing

Texas No

Name Number

47 Dam

Acala

Fort

Hancock NW

McNary

Cavett To Lake rnillo

Fort

Hancock

30"

105°52'30"

31°22'30" 22'

57'30" 105°52'30"

31° 30"

17'30" 17'

20' 20'

10 500 000

560 000 FEET

31°15'

57'

00'

00'

31°

106°

15'

30"

55'

106° 55'

10 470 000

E

34 000m

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

4

34

34

34

4 4

34

4

4 4

4 4

4

4

4

34

4

34

34

4 4 000m

34

34

4

34

34

4

34

4

34

34 000m

34

34

34

4

4 4

4

4

71 N

61

60

63

62

64

65

59

16

71

06

N

70

68

60

15

15

08

05 06 11 16

67

09

11

58

08 14

69

65

62

12

64

61

10 13

63

66

68

66

07

14

59

07

69

10 12 13

70

58

FEET

FEET

530 000 FEET

000mE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 31105-232

ACALA, TX-CHH

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

ACALA QUADRANGLE

TEXAS-CHIHUAHUA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 13R

Imagery.............................................NAIP, September 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2005

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 29 ́

9 MILS

8° 42 ́

155 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13R

DQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET