alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***IDEA* Website**

***OSEP Update* Newsletter**

**Early Learning**

***IDEA* Section 618 Data**

**RDA**

**ED Data Express**

**COMMUNITY 360°**

***IDEA*s That Work**

**OSERS Newsletters and Listservs**

The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is dedicated to improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities ages birth through 21 by providing leadership and financial support to assist states and local districts. 

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 (IDEA) authorizes formula grants to states and discretionary grants to institutions of higher education and other non-profit organizations to support research, demonstrations, technology and personnel development and parent-training and information centers. 

Discretionary grants are grants awarded through a competitive process and OSEP maintains a listing of new discretionary funding opportunities.

 

**"OSEP 101"**A video overview of OSEP

 

 

### OSEP Navigation

About OSEP | People and OfficesPrograms and Projects | Grants and FundingLegislation and Policy | Publications and ProductsResearch and Statistics | National Studies | MonitoringContact and Feedback
Exhibit 10(a) 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  



We consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 28 to Registration Statement (Investment
Company Act File No. 811-21162) on Form N-1A of our report dated August 26, 2009,
relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock Basic Value
Principal Protected Fund of BlackRock Principal Protected Trust (the “Fund”) appearing
in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of the Fund for the year ended June 30, 2009. We also
consent to the reference to us under the heading “Financial Statements” in Part B of
this Registration Statement. 



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 



Princeton, New Jersey 
October 23,
2009
June 24, 2015

Mr. Edward Stanza 1954 Argyle Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90068

Dear Mr.Stanza :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 5, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2136), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# C_2017186EN.01000301.xml

| 10.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 June 2017

(2017/C 186/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1176 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4378 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87638 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7615 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0863 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5218 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,223 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,32 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1903 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5628 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9444 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4837 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5098 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7136 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5520 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5469 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 256,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4002 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5962 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 862,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7666 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,332 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,6657 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,077 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6476 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3526 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,8000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1176

JPY

Japanese yen

123,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4378

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87638

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7615

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0863

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5218

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,223

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,32

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1903

RON

Romanian leu

4,5628

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9444

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4837

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5098

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7136

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5520

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5469

KRW

South Korean won

1 256,54

ZAR

South African rand

14,4002

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5962

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 862,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7666

PHP

Philippine peso

55,332

RUB

Russian rouble

63,6657

THB

Thai baht

38,077

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6476

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3526

INR

Indian rupee

71,8000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016491EN.01000101.xml

| 31.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 491/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 491/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 December 2016

(2016/C 491/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0541 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4344 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85618 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5525 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0739 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0863 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,83 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4103 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5390 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,7072 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4596 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4188 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1751 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5158 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5234 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 269,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4570 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3202 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5597 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 173,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7287 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,268 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,3000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,726 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4305 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7719 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,5935 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0541

JPY

Japanese yen

123,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4344

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85618

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5525

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0739

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0863

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,83

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4103

RON

Romanian leu

4,5390

TRY

Turkish lira

3,7072

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4596

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4188

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1751

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5158

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5234

KRW

South Korean won

1 269,36

ZAR

South African rand

14,4570

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3202

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5597

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 173,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7287

PHP

Philippine peso

52,268

RUB

Russian rouble

64,3000

THB

Thai baht

37,726

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4305

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7719

INR

Indian rupee

71,5935

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### In the Matter of Sharon Lashley, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[832 NYS2d 829]—

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding her guilty of creating a disturbance, harassment, refusing a direct order (two counts) and lewd behavior, all violations of prison disciplinary rules. We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with the testimony of three correction officers, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Price v Goord,*29 AD3d 1203, 1204 [2006]; *Matter of Vizcaino v Selsky,*
      *110626 AD3d 574 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 708 [2006]). Petitioner’s exculpatory statements as to the nature of her acts presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Miller v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*295 AD2d 714, 714-715 [2002]; *Matter of McGoey v Selsky,*260 AD2d 814, 815 [1999]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.

Crew III, J.R, Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:125
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:126
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:127
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:128
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:129
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:130
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:131
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:132
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 9 of 11 PageID #:133
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 10 of 11 PageID #:134
Case: 1:12-cv-03595 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/17/13 Page 11 of 11 PageID #:135
#### 2452.216-78 Ordering procedures.

As prescribed in 2416.506-70(d), insert the following provision:

# Ordering Procedures (FEB 2006)

(a) Orders issued under this contract may be placed in writing or via [*Contracting Officer to insert authorized ordering methods, e.g., telephone, facsimile (fax) machine, electronic mail (e-mail)*].

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (FEB 2006). As prescribed in 2416.506-70(d), add paragraph (b):

(b) In addition to the Contracting Officer, the following individuals are authorized to issue orders under this contract:

[Continue as necessary]

(End of clause)

*Alternate II* (FEB 2006). As prescribed in 2416.506-70(d), add paragraph (b):

(b) This contract provides for the issuance of task orders on a negotiated basis as follows:

(1) The Contracting Officer will provide the contractor(s) with a statement of work or task description. The contractor(s) shall provide pricing and other information requested by the Contracting Officer (e.g., proposed staffing, plan for completing the task, etc.) within the time period specified by the Contracting Officer. Failure by any contractor to provide all the requested information on time may result in the contractor not being considered or selected for issuance of the order.

(2) The Contracting Officer may require the contractor(s) to present and/or discuss (see (3) below) the proposed task order terms orally. The Contracting Officer will provide the contractor(s) with guidance on the format, location, and duration of any presentations.

(3) The Contracting Officer may discuss the proposed task order terms with the contractor(s) to ensure mutual understanding of the contractor(s)'s technical approach and/or costs or price and/or to reach mutually acceptable final terms for the task order. If more than one contractor is being considered for the task order, any discussions will be held individually with each contractor.

(4) The task order shall be executed by the contractor and the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[71 FR 2439, Jan. 13, 2006]
Protecting Students

**Overview**  The ability of individuals to oppose  discriminatory practices and to participate in OCR investigations and other  proceedings is critical to ensuring equal educational opportunity in accordance  with Federal civil rights laws. For this reason, recipients of Federal funds  are prohibited from intimidating, threatening, coercing, or discriminating  against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or  privilege secured by Federal civil rights law. Once  a student, parent, teacher, coach, or other individual complains formally or  informally to a school about a potential civil rights violation or participates  in an OCR investigation or proceeding, the recipient is prohibited from  retaliating (including intimidating, threatening, coercing, or in any way  discriminating against the individual) because of the individual’s complaint or  participation. OCR will continue to  vigorously enforce this prohibition against retaliation.  Below are recent  cases that addressed the issue of retaliation.

 

----

- Cartwright Elementary School District (AZ) (08-13-1172)    - Read the Resolution Letter    PDF  (155K)
  - Read the Resolution Agreement    PDF  (160K)
- Birmingham City School District (AL) (04-13-1368)    - Read the Resolution Letter    PDF  (99K)
  - Read the Resolution Agreement    PDF  (94K)

To access resolution documents created on or after October 1, 2013 click 	**here**or enter criteria in the search box below:      Keyword(s):   Last Modified: 06/29/2020
# C_2017073EN.01000201.xml

| 9.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8221 — Blackstone/OfficeFirst)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 73/03)

On 2 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8221. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8221. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 16.501-1 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Delivery-order contract* means a contract for supplies that does not procure or specify a firm quantity of supplies (other than a minimum or maximum quantity) and that provides for the issuance of orders for the delivery of supplies during the period of the contract.

*Task-order contract* means a contract for services that does not procure or specify a firm quantity of services (other than a minimum or maximum quantity) and that provides for the issuance of orders for the performance of tasks during the period of the contract.

[60 FR 49725, Sept. 26, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 24318, Apr. 25, 2000; 75 FR 13421, Mar. 19, 2010]
#### 252.227-7006 License grant—running royalty.

As prescribed at 227.7009-4(a), insert the following clause in patent releases, license agreements, and assignments:

# License Grant—Running Royalty (AUG 1984)

(a) The Contractor hereby grants to the Government, as represented by the Secretary of __________, an irrevocable, nonexclusive, nontransferable license under the following patents, applications for patent, and any patents granted on such applications, and under any patents which may issue as the result of any reissue, division, or continuation thereunder to practice by or cause to be practiced for the Department of ________, throughout the world, any and all of the inventions thereunder in the manufacture and use of any article or material, in the use of any method or process, and in the disposition of any article or material in accordance with law:

U.S. Patent No.

Date

Application Serial No.

Filing Date

together with corresponding foreign patents and foreign applications for patent, insofar as the Contractor has the right to grant licenses thereunder without incurring an obligation to pay royalties or other compensation to others solely on account of such grant.

(b) No rights are granted or implied by the agreement under any other patents other than as provided above or by operation of law.

(c) Nothing contained herein shall limit any rights which the Government may have obtained by virtue of prior contracts or by operation of law or otherwise.

(End of clause)
***Awarding Other Financial  Assistance (OFA)***

***OFA-Q1:*** Can I use a negative SAI to increase a student’s financial need to increase the amount of need-based aid the student can receive? 

***OFA-A1:*** No. If a student has a negative SAI, the school must convert the negative SAI to a 0 SAI to calculate the student’s financial need. Though the negative SAI can be used as a determining factor when selecting students for school or state aid or for consideration when awarding campus-based funding, the negative SAI cannot be used directly to increase the amount of a student’s financial need for purposes of awarding federal student aid. [Guidance issued 08/04/2023]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 123 

Designating May 20, 2017, as ‘‘Kids to Parks Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2017 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. PORTMAN, 

Mr. BOOKER, and Ms. HIRONO) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 20, 2017, as ‘‘Kids to Parks Day’’. 

Whereas the 7th annual Kids to Parks Day will be celebrated 

on May 20, 2017; 

Whereas the goal of Kids to Parks Day is to promote healthy 

outdoor recreation and environmental stewardship, empower young people, and encourage families to get outdoors and visit the parks and public land of the United 

States; 

Whereas on Kids to Parks Day, individuals from rural and 

urban areas of the United States can be reintroduced to 

the splendid national, State, and neighborhood parks located in their communities; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 123 IS 

Whereas communities across the United States offer a variety 

of natural resources and public land, often with free access, to individuals seeking outdoor recreation; 

Whereas the people of the United States, young and old, 

should be encouraged to lead more healthy and active 

lifestyles; 

Whereas Kids to Parks Day is an opportunity for families to 

take a break from their busy lives and come together for 

a day of active, wholesome fun; and 

Whereas Kids to Parks Day will broaden an appreciation for 

nature and the outdoors in young people, foster a safe 

setting for independent play and healthy adventure in 

neighborhood parks, and facilitate self-reliance while 

strengthening communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 20, 2017, as ‘‘Kids to 

3 Parks Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of outdoor recre5 ation and the preservation of open spaces to the 

6 health and education of the young people of the 

7 United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe the day with appropriate programs, cere10 monies, and activities. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Chart 25666HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       25666          Edition:       18          Edition       Date: July       2006          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/29/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
The Office of Communications & Outreach produces newsletters, op-eds and letters to the editor, a TV show and webcasts, audio clips for radio broadcasters, answers to frequently asked questions, a website of teaching and learning resources from across the federal government, and resources for parents.  

You may also be interested in our overview of the U.S. Department of Education and the Department's publications.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-05252 Document #: 53 Filed: 08/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:849