alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## FY 2023

- Funded Projects - Noncompeting Continuation    MS Word  (15K)

## FY 2022

- Funded Projects - Noncompeting Continuation    MS Word  (15K)

## FY 2021

- Funded Projects -    PDF  (120K)
- Project Abstract(s) -    MS Word  (64K)

## FY 2020

- Funded Projects - Noncompeting Continuation    MS Word  (16K)

## FY 2019

- Funded Projects - Noncompeting Continuation    MS Word  (16K)

## FY 2018

- Funded Projects - Noncompeting Continuation    MS Word  (16K)

## FY 2017

- Funded Projects    MS Word  (46K)

## FY 2016

- Funded Projects - New    MS Word  (28K)
- Funded Projects - Noncompeting Continuation    MS Word  (44K)

## FY 2015

- Funded Projects    MS Word  (44K)

## FY 2014

- Funded Projects    MS Word  (44K)

## FY 2013

- Funded Projects    MS Word  (44K)

## FY 2012

- Funded Projects    MS Word  (44K)

## FY 2011

- Funded Projects    MS Excel  (30K) |  PDF  (51K)
- Project Abstracts    MS Word  (170K) |  PDF  (159K)

## FT 2010

No grants awarded.

## FY 2009

- Funded Projects    MS Excel  (31K) |  PDF  (158K)
- Project Abstracts    MS Word  (98K) |  PDF  (187K)

## FY 2008

- Funded Projects    MS Excel  (28K) |  PDF  (152K)
- Project Abstracts    MS Word  (125K) |  PDF  (234K)

Institutional Service Home
exv10w12






EXHIBIT 10.12




Description of Arrangement for Directors Fees



The following sets forth the amount of annual fees payable (excluding representation expenses) to
each non-employee director of W Holding Company, Inc. (except for directors who receive benefits
from any retirement plan), for their services as Directors in fiscal year 2008:




	 	 	 
	Event	 	Fees
	Annual Retainer:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	For those Directors with
participation in less than three
board of Directors committees.

	 	$24,000 annually, payable on a monthly basis ($2,000).
	 
	 	 
	For those Directors with
participation in more than three
Board of Directors committees.

	 	$42,000 annually, payable on a monthly basis ($3,500).
	 
	 	 
	Secretary of the Board of Directors

	 	$6,720 annually, payable on a monthly basis ($560).
	 
	 	 
	Chairman of the Audit Committee

	 	$6,000 annually, payable on a monthly basis ($500).
	 
	 	 
	Secretary of the Audit Committee

	 	$12,000 annually, payable on a monthly basis ($1,000).
	 
	 	 
	Audit Committee Financial Expert

	 	$6,000 annually, payable on a monthly basis ($500).





W Holding Company, Inc. may also reimburse Directors for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with attendance at meetings of and other activities relating to service on the Board of
Directors or any Board of Directors committee.
');
	document.write('

The office of Student Service (SS) is happy to present a new resource for interested applicants, grantees, and other entities that want more information about the Federal TRIO programs; the Child Care Access Means Parents in School Program; Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP); the College Access Challenge Grant Program; and the Graduate Fellowships Programs (Title VII, Part A, Higher Education Act, as amended).

- SS Updates - September 2016: Special Edition on Resources to Support Disconnected Youth (PDF, 1014K) | MS Word (90K)
- SS Updates - February 2016 (PDF, 700K) | MS Word (94K)
- VUB Newsletter: A Commemorative Publication - August 2015 (PDF, 971K) | MS Word (64K)
- SS Updates - February 2015 (PDF, 1.2MB) | MS Word (82K)
- SS Updates - August 2014 (PDF, 702K) | MS Word (56K) -- 50th Anniversary Commemorative Edition
- SS Updates - April 2014 (PDF, 2.68MB) | MS Word (61K)
- SS Updates - December 2013 (PDF, 610K) | MS Word (72K)
- SS Updates - June 2013 (PDF, 919K) | MS Word (56K)
- SS Updates - February 2013 (PDF, 410K) | MS Word (58K)
- SS Updates - November 2012 (PDF, 863K)  | MS Word (67K)
- SS Updates - April 2012 (PDF, 392K) | MS Word (53K)

For SS newsletter inquiries or to subscribe, contact:  ReShone Moore



| Student Service Home | OPE Newsletters |  ED Newsletters and Journals |
Exhibit 31.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

                    SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Victor Zaccaglin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Calprop Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure control and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's third fiscal quarter) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

August 24, 2004

/s/ Victor Zaccaglin
-----------------------
Victor Zaccaglin
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of John T. Reges, an Attorney.

Application by an attorney from the State of Maryland for admission to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in this State, granted. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 252.247-7027 Riding gang member requirements.

As prescribed in 247.574(e), use the following clause:

# Riding Gang Member Requirements (MAY 2018)

(a) *Definition. Riding gang member,* as used in this clause, has the same definition as “riding gang member” in title 46 U.S.C. 2101.

(b) *Requirements relating to riding gang members.* Notwithstanding 46 U.S.C. 8106, the Contractor shall ensure each riding gang member holds a valid U.S. Merchant Mariner's Document issued under 46 U.S.C. chapter 73, or a transportation security card issued under section 70105 of such title.

(c) *Exemption.* (1) An individual is exempt from the requirements of paragraph (b) of this clause and shall not be treated as a riding gang member for the purposes of section 8106 of title 46, if that individual is on a vessel for purposes other than engaging in the operation or maintenance of the vessel and is—

(i) One of the personnel who accompanies, supervises, guards, or maintains unit equipment aboard a ship, commonly referred to as supercargo personnel;

(ii) One of the force protection personnel of the vessel;

(iii) A specialized repair technician; or

(iv) An individual who is otherwise required by the Secretary of Defense or designee to be aboard the vessel.

(2) Any individual who is exempt under paragraph (c)(1) of this clause must pass a DoD background check before going aboard the vessel.

(i) The Contractor shall—

(A) Render all necessary assistance to U.S. Armed Forces personnel with respect to the identification and screening of exempted individuals. This will require, at a minimum, the Contractor to submit the name and other biographical information necessary to the Government official specified in the contract for the purposes of conducting a background check; and

(B) Deny access or immediately remove any individual(s) from the vessel deemed unsuitable for any reason by the Government agency conducting the background checks. The Contractor agrees to replace any such individual promptly and require such replacements to fully comply with all screening requirements.

(ii) The head of the contracting activity may waive this requirement if the individual possesses a valid U.S. Merchant Mariner's Document issued under 46 U.S.C. chapter 73, or a transportation security card issued under section 70105 of such title.

(3) An individual exempted under paragraph (c)(1) of this clause is not treated as a riding gang member and shall not be counted as an individual in addition to the crew for the purposes of 46 U.S.C. 3304.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 65439, Oct. 25, 2010, as amended at 76 FR 61281, Oct. 4, 2011; 83 FR 24892, May 30, 2018; 84 FR 4371, Feb. 15, 2019]
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: 6-18-12 Phone Conversation with AF&PA

FROM: Marc Thomas

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On June 18, 2012, EPA, represented by Suzanne Rudzinski, Director of the Office of Resource 

Conservation and Recovery, and Jim Berlow, Director of ORCR’s Program Implementation and 

Information Division, had a phone conversation with Tim Hunt and Susan Bodine of the American Forest 

and Paper Association (AF&PA). Below are the key issues raised during this call. EPA asked clarifying 

questions.

1) Pulp and Paper WW Treatment Sludges: 

- EPA should not be considering how sludges that are not burned are managed

- Rule does not apply to sludges except when burned; therefore we must only consider if discard 

is occurring when burned

- Sludges are managed like analogous wastes such as bark; rule says analogous is the test

2) OCC Rejects (aka paper processing residuals) 

- Should be considered for a regulatory determination or preamble language saying this material 

appears to meet legitimacy

3) C&D Materials that are not initially clean but have been processed

- Industry has defined practices that should assure effective processing to meet legitimacy

- EPA should provide reg determination or preamble language saying this material appears to 

meet legitimacy when processed in this manner

4) Treated Wood

- EPA should provide reg determination or preamble language saying this material appears to 

meet legitimacy

5) Contained Gas:

- Industry concerned about generic impacts of RCRA waste finding on gases in pipes (not just 

NHSM materials)

- Concerned with materials being transported by pipe for incineration/destruction by air 

emission controls (maybe other destruction scenarios), not just energy recovery

- Only workable/defensible solution is to state that RCRA position is that contained gas is gas in 

container when combusted
## Timeline

This program operates on a four-year grant cycle.

The FY 2024 American Overseas Research Centers (AORC) program competition is **closed**. The below information regarding the FY 2024 competition is for reference only.

## Federal Register Notice

- Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for FY 2024 , dated January 26, 2024 |  PDF 

## Current Application

The FY 2024 AORC program competition is closed. The deadline to apply was **March 26, 2024**.

Applications were submitted online through Grants.gov.

- Grants.gov Funding  Opportunity Number:  ED-GRANTS-012624-001 
- FY 2024 AORC Application Instructions:    MS Word  (307K)

## Tips and Assistance

- IFLE held a technical assistance webinar for the FY 2024 AORC competition on February 7, 2024.  A recording of the webinar is available to stream on YouTube at  https://youtu.be/O4xmMj2Q5SY .

## Application Contact

Cheryl E. GibbsAmerican Overseas Research Centers ProgramU.S. Department of Education, OPEInternational and Foreign Language Education400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Room 5C103Washington, DC 20202Telephone:   (202) 453-5690

IFLE Home
```

[111th Congress Public Law 187]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 1272]]

Public Law 111-187
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the ``Martin G. `Marty' Mahar 
          Post Office''. <<NOTE: June 9, 2010 -  [H.R. 4425]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MARTIN G. ``MARTY'' MAHAR POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2-116th Street in North Troy, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Martin G. `Marty' Mahar Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Martin G. 
`Marty' Mahar Post Office''.

    Approved June 9, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4425 (S. 3012):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Feb. 22, considered and passed House.
            May 25, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 30, 2009



By:

/s/    Takanobu ItoName:

Takanobu ItoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ernest Gadson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered January 8, 1963, after a jury trial, eon-. victing him of burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the second *829degree, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. On the court’s own motion, the notice of appeal, inadvertently directed to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Department, has been deemed amended so as to properly bring the appeal to this court (Code Grim Pro., §§ 524-a, 542; cf. N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted **

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                January 12, 2007 | **/S/                DORRIT J. BERN**                |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Dorrit                J. Bern                        |
|                                   | Chairman                of the Board                 |
|                                   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                                 |
| Dated:                January 12, 2007 | **/S/                ERIC M. SPECTER**               |
|                                   | Eric                M. Specter                       |
|                                   | Executive                Vice President              |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer               |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03107

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

ALC CVMA, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, May 17, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Motion hearing held on

5/17/2012. Motion by Plaintiff Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership to expedite discovery

[30] is granted as stated in open court. Defendants to answer or otherwise plead by 6/7/12.

Joint proposed discovery schedule to be filed before next status hearing. Status hearing set

for 5/24/2012 at 09:30 AM. Mailed notice (cjg, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 34 Filed: 05/17/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1250
|   | EXHIBIT 31.1 |
|--------|--------------|

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Valley National Bancorp; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 1, 2015                    |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
|                                 |
|                                 |
| /s/ Gerald H. Lipkin                 |
| Gerald H. Lipkin                     |
| Chairman of the Board, President and |
| Chief Executive Officer              |

----
(October 11, 1960)

#### Nester Velasquez, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Velasquez, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
2432.703-1 General. ( b ) ( 1 ) Except as described herein, a fixed-price contract may be funded incrementally only if— ( i ) Sufficient funds are not available to the Department at the time of contract award or exercise of option to fully fund the contract or option; and
( ii ) The contract (excluding any options) or any exercised option— ( A ) Is for severable services; and
( B ) Does not exceed one year in length; and
( C ) Is incrementally funded using funds available (unexpired) as of the date the funds are obligated; and
( iii ) If applicable, the contract uses funds available from multiple (2 or more) fiscal years and Congress has otherwise authorized incremental funding.
( 2 ) An incrementally funded fixed-price contract shall be fully funded as soon as funds are available.
[77 FR 73530, Dec. 10, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 13752, Mar. 15, 2016]
# C_2017122EN.01000101.xml

| 19.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8361 — Qatar Airways/Alisarda/Meridiana)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 122/01)

On 22 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8361. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8361. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016466EN.01000101.xml

| 14.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8152 — Arkema/Den Braven)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 466/01)

On 4 November 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8152. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8152. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---