alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,355,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 40,169,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,359,452
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,528,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,756,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,154,785
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,583,380)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,528,913
<SALES>                                     22,458,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,518,344
<CGS>                                       20,718,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,718,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,415,111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             129,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                178,156
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,330,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,508,156
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,508,156
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 22 (Thursday, February 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Institutional Development 
Award (IDeA) Program Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational 
Research (IDeA-CTR) (U54).
    Date: March 19, 2021.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Saraswathy Seetharam, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3AN12C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2763, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c4f595948545d4e5d514f7c52555b514f12525554125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d2e383829353c2f3c302e1d33343a302e73333435733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-02287 Filed 2-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
2933.212 Contracting officer's duties upon appeal. ( a ) When a notice of appeal to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals has been received, the contracting officer must record the date of mailing (or the date of receipt if the notice was not mailed). The contracting officer must also immediately notify the Office of the Solicitor of the appeal.
( b ) The contracting officer should prepare and transmit the administrative file to the Office of the Solicitor and assist the Office of the Solicitor in the defense of the appeal and related matters.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Michele DiCosola, 

Defendant(s).

Case No. 12 CR 446

Judge Harry D. Leinenweber

ORDER

Bench Trial Held. The Court finds the defendant GUILTY on Counts 5 and 6 of the Indictment. 

Judgment of GUILTY entered on Counts 5 and 6 of the Indictment. Trial ends-Bench. Status 

hearing set for 7/7/2015 at 9:00 a.m. Enter excludable delay in the interest of justice to begin 

6/26/2015 and end 7/7/2015 pursuant to 18:3161(h)(7)(A)(B). (X-T)

Time: 5:00

Date: 6/26/2015 Harry D. Leinenweber

United States District Judge

Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 286 Filed: 06/26/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3323
Case: 1:12-cv-05563 Document #: 128 Filed: 05/09/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1307
Case: 1:12-cv-05563 Document #: 128 Filed: 05/09/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:1308
Case: 1:12-cv-05563 Document #: 128 Filed: 05/09/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:1309
Case: 1:12-cv-05563 Document #: 128 Filed: 05/09/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:1310
Case: 1:12-cv-05563 Document #: 128 Filed: 05/09/14 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:1311
');
	document.write('

What's NewFederal Register Notice inviting applications for the Migrant Education Even Start programApply Online. Information is available on the Applicant Info page The deadline is May 14, 2010


**Program Office:** Office of Migrant Education

**CFDA Number:** 84.214A**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants**Also Known As:**Migrant Education Even Start; MEES

This program is designed to help break the cycle of poverty and improve the literacy of participating migrant families by integrating early childhood education, adult literacy or adult basic education, and parenting education into a unified family literacy program.

This program supports family literacy projects. Projects provide for: early childhood education; adult literacy (adult basic and secondary-level education and instruction for English language learners [ELLs]); parenting education; and interactive parent-child literacy activities for participating families, often through other entities providing these services, such as government agencies, colleges and universities, public schools, Head Start programs, and other public and private community-based groups. Projects provide staff training and support services, such as child care and transportation, when unavailable from other sources, to enable participation in core education activities.
Response to EPA’s request for additional information on 110(a)(2)(G) element for Georgia 

EPD’s SIP submittal based on the partial consent decree related to EPA’s action on the 2008 8-

hour ozone iSIPs.

Georgia cites the Georgia Air Quality Act: Article 1: Air Quality (O.C.G.A. Section 12-9, et 

seq.) EPA requests that the state identify and document specific subsections citations to 

document compliance with requirements for elements 110(a)(2)(G) for the authority to act 

if the public welfare is threatened.

Georgia Air Quality Act is located at http://epd.georgia.gov/existing-rules-and-correspondinglaws

Specific subsection citations in Georgia Air Quality Act: Article 1: Air Quality (O.C.G.A. 

Section 12-9, et seq.) to document compliance with requirements for elements 110(a)(2)(G) 

along with previously submitted documentation is given below.

Element Specific Citation

110(a)(2)(G) The declaration of Georgia’s policy to 

preserve, protect and improve air 

quality and to control emissions to 

prevent significant deterioration, 

Georgia Air Quality Act Article 1: Air 

Quality (O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-2. 

Declaration of public policy)

Georgia’s authority to act if the public 

welfare is threatened, Georgia Air 

Quality Act Article 1: Air Quality

(O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-6. Powers and 

duties of director as to air quality

generally)

Georgia’s authority to act if the public 

welfare is threatened, Georgia Air 

Quality Act Article 1: Air Quality

(O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-12. Injunctive 

relief)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             296
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,699
<PP&E>                                           5,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,518
<SALES>                                         19,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,332
<CGS>                                            8,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    394
<INCOME-TAX>                                       307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 87
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        87
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
## Timeline

*This program operates on a five-year grant cycle.*

**Current competition:  FY 2021**

## Federal Register Notices

- (Archive)  Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for FY 2021  |    PDF  (244KB)
- (Archive)  Talent Search Reopening Notice   |    PDF  (244KB)

## Current Application

The archived FY 2021 Talent Search application package can be found at grants.gov.

The Department reopened the  competition for the FY 2021 Talent Search Program competition, Assistance  Listing Number [84.044A], for potential applicants in areas in Louisiana (FEMA  Disaster designation: EM-3556-LA), Oklahoma (FEMA Disaster designation: EM-3555-OK) and Texas (FEMA Disaster designation: EM-3554-TX) for which the President has issued an emergency  declaration. For applicants that meet the eligibility criteria in this  notice, we are reopening the competition until March 12, 2021. We are also  extending the intergovernmental review deadline until May 11, 2021. Please  review the Federal Register official notice of this reopening.

## Application Contact

Craig Pooler, craig.pooler@ed.gov, 202-453-6195U.S. Department of Education400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.Washington, DC  20202E-mail:  OPE_TRIO@ed.gov

If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.

Top

TRIO Home
#### 2832.1110 Solicitation provision and contract clauses.

When the clause at FAR 52.232-34, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT)—Other than System for Award Management, is required, the contracting officer may insert in paragraph (b)(1) of the clause a particular time after award, such as a fixed number of days, or an event such as the submission of the first request for payment, to establish the point at which contractors' EFT information shall be provided.
#### Sally Lodato, Respondent, v Town of Oyster Bay, Defendant, and Richard Bohner, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Richard Bohner appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 17, 1978, which is in favor of plaintiff and against him, after a jury trial limited to the issue of liability only. Interlocutory judgment reversed, on the law, and complaint dismissed, with costs. As the plaintiff walked on the sidewalk abutting the premises owned by defendant Bohner, she tripped over an elevated flag of concrete and fell, injuring herself. The evidence adduced at the trial showed only that defendant Bohner saw to it that the walk was swept and cleared of snow and that the areas of grass abutting the walk were mowed. It appeared that the concrete flag became elevated as a result of upward pressure of an adjacent tree root; however, no cause was actually proven. The Town of Oyster Bay maintained the trees and the County of Nassau maintained the street. It was not proven that defendant Bohner did anything to cause the condition complained of. Under these circumstances, plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case against defendant Bohner (see *City of Rochester v Campbell,*123 NY 405; *Jacques v Maratskey,*41 AD2d 883; 26 NY Jur, Highways, Streets, and Bridges, §§ 363-365). Accordingly, the complaint must be dismissed. We note with disapproval that the trial court instructed the jurors as to the contents of an ordinance of the Town of Oyster Bay which imposes the duty of care and repair of sidewalks upon abutting landowners, but which does not impose any tort liability upon such persons for their failure to comply with the ordinance. That ordinance had no application to this case and the court so noted in its charge. In addition, we would also point out that when the attorney for defendant Bohner continually objected to a line of questioning followed by plaintiff’s counsel, intended, obviously, to elicit from defendant Bohner, called as plaintiff’s witness, the fact that he was insured in this matter, the trial court continually overruled such objections and went to the extreme of telling the jurors that it did not think that the revealing of this fact was so terrible. Although, eventually, the trial court did give curative instructions which tended to vitiate the error, the trial court’s treatment of this matter was generally improper. Rabin, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
{File: 00866105.DOC}

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR 

IN INTEREST TO JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, 

N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE 

CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF POPULAR ABS, 

INC. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005-2

 PLAINTIFF 

CASE NUMBER:1:12-cv-4962 

VS. DISTRICT JUDGE: Ruben Castillo

EDGAR F. MENDOZA, ROSA M. MENDOZA,

 DEFENDANT(S).

MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Young B. Kim

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT FOR FORECLOSURE AND SALE

Plaintiff, by counsel, moves this Court for the entry of a Judgment for Foreclosure and Sale 

based on the pleadings of record with this Court. 

Respectfully submitted,

__/s/ Julia M. Bochnowski____________ 

One of Plaintiff's Attorneys

Julia M. Bochnowski

Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

225 W. Washington St., Ste. 2200

Chicago, IL 60606

(219) 769-1313
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

TUNOKA JETT, as guardian and next friend of 

her minor son, JOHN DOE, , 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

12 CV 4263 

Judge Dow 

Magistrate Judge SOAT BROWN 

The CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal 

Corporation, and Chicago Police Officers 

MOHAMMED ALI (#7241), MACARIO 

CHAVEZ (#9084), and MATILDE OCAMPO 

(#13474), 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

AGREED ORDER APPROVING MINOR’S SETTLEMENT 

AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS 

Upon motion by the parties, through their attorneys, and for the entry of an order approving 

a settlement in the amount of Two Millions Dollars ($2,000,000.00), the Court having presided over 

this matter since its filing, having personally mediated two settlement conferences with the parties, 

and having reviewed the terms of the settlement, an itemization of costs and fees, and the proposed 

release and settlement agreement in this matter finds as follows: 

 1. The settlement amount of $2,000,000.00 is fair and reasonable. 

 2. Plaintiff TUNOKA JETT, as mother and guardian of JOHN DOE, is competent to 

represent JOHN DOE in this matter. 

 3. Pursuant to written contract, Plaintiff’s attorneys are entitled to fees in the amount of 

$660,000.00 (Six Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars), an amount which represents 33% of the total 

settlement amount. Having presided over this matter since its filing three years ago, the Court finds 

this to be a reasonable fee in this case. 

Case: 1:12-cv-04263 Document #: 86 Filed: 04/30/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:301
2

 4. The attorneys for Plaintiff are also entitled to reimbursement for expenses attributable to 

this lawsuit in the amount of $5,914.58. The Court has examined an itemized list of expenses in this 

matter and finds them to be necessary and reasonable. 

 5. The net amount distributable to the minor Plaintiff’s trust is $1,334,085.42 to be paid by the 

City of Chicago as outlined in the parties’ release and settlement agreement, which was reviewed by 

this Court. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the settlement and distribution of funds is approved 

as outlined above. 

 ENTERED: _______________________________ 

 Judge Robert Dow 

 United States District Court Judge 

 Dated: April 30, 2015 

Case: 1:12-cv-04263 Document #: 86 Filed: 04/30/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:301
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Wilmer D. Leinbach, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer, certify, that:

 

1.        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sun Bancorp,Inc.

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report.

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

(b)      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

(a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | 3/12/04 |   | By:                                                  | /s/  Wilmer D. Leinbach |   |
|--------|---------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   |    |   | Executive Vice President andChief Financial  Officer |

 

----
217.7103-4 Emergency work. ( a ) The contracting officer, without soliciting offers, may issue a written job order to a contractor that has previously executed a master agreement when— ( i ) Delay in the performance of necessary repair work would endanger a vessel, its cargo or stores; or
( ii ) Military necessity requires immediate work on a vessel.
( b ) Follow the procedures at PGI 217.7103-4 when processing this type of undefinitized contract action.
[56 FR 36345, July 31, 1991. Redesignated and amended at 71 FR 27643, May 12, 2006]
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the use of our report dated February 1, 2000,
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hanover Bancorp,
Inc. for the year ended Decemer 31, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements included in this Form 10-K/A.
         We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-78538) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-73472, 33-73470
and 33-73796) of Hanover Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February 1, 2000 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Hanover Bancorp, Inc.
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10K/A) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.


                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
April 26, 2000


                                         63