alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
232.206 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( f ) *Prompt payment for commercial purchase payments.* The contracting officer shall incorporate the following standard prompt payment terms for commercial product and commercial service contract financing: ( i ) *Commercial advance payments:* The contractor entitlement date specified in the contract, or 30 days after receipt by the designated billing office of a proper request for payment, whichever is later.
( ii ) *Commercial interim payments:* The contractor entitlement date specified in the contract, or 14 days after receipt by the designated billing office of a proper request for payment, whichever is later. The prompt payment standards for commercial delivery payments shall be the same as specified in FAR Subpart 32.9 for invoice payments for the item delivered.
( g ) *Installment payment financing for commercial products and commercial services.* Installment payment financing shall not be used for DoD contracts, unless market research has established that this form of contract financing is both appropriate and customary in the commercial marketplace. When installment payment financing is used, the contracting officer shall use the ceiling percentage of contract price that is customary in the particular marketplace (not to exceed the maximum rate established in FAR 52.232-30).
[63 FR 11537, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 75413, Dec. 20, 2005; 87 FR 6587, Jan. 31, 2023]
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 34 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:146
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 34 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:147
# C_2017048EN.01000101.xml

| 15.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 February 2017

(2017/C 48/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0623 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4359 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85098 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4653 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0659 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8790 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3012 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5051 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8780 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3813 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3842 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2422 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4780 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5044 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 207,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,9140 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2902 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4537 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 138,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7263 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,952 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 60,9409 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,154 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2881 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4981 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,9755 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0623

JPY

Japanese yen

120,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4359

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85098

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4653

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0659

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8790

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3012

RON

Romanian leu

4,5051

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8780

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3813

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3842

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2422

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4780

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5044

KRW

South Korean won

1 207,63

ZAR

South African rand

13,9140

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2902

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4537

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 138,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7263

PHP

Philippine peso

52,952

RUB

Russian rouble

60,9409

THB

Thai baht

37,154

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2881

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4981

INR

Indian rupee

70,9755

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          78,000                  23,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,000                  23,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,024,000                 735,000
<PP&E>                                      52,316,000              38,251,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,000                  39,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,981,000              41,303,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,193,000               3,676,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,375,000               5,200,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,310,000              22,851,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,981,000              41,303,000
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               733,000                 455,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (1,508,000)             (1,269,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (82,000)               (658,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (2,696,000)               (167,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,553,000)             (1,639,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,553,000)             (1,639,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,553,000)             (1,639,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.80)                  (1.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.80)                  (1.86)






</TABLE>
246.870-3 Contract clauses. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, use the clause at 252.246-7007, Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance System, in solicitations and contracts when procuring— ( i ) Electronic parts;
( ii ) End items, components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts; or
( iii ) Services, if the contractor will supply electronic parts or components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts as part of the service.
( 2 ) Do not use the clause in solicitations and contracts that are set aside for small business.
( b ) Use the clause at 252.246-7008, Sources of Electronic Parts, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, when procuring— ( 1 ) Electronic parts;
( 2 ) End items, components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts; or
( 3 ) Services, if the contractor will supply electronic parts or components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts as part of the service.
[79 FR 26106, May 6, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 50649, Aug. 2, 2016; 88 FR 6588, Jan. 31, 2023]
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: October 4, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0322 

Case No. 2012NM060030 

Respondent Docket No. FAA-2014-0686 

Case No. 2014WP910006 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0809 

Case No. 2012NM060029 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0810 

Case No. 2012NM060123 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0811 

Case No. 2013NM060083 

Docket No. FAA-2016-4267 

Case No. 2015WP910079 

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' THIRD 

JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 

On June 8, 2016, the undersigned judge granted the parties' Second Joint Motion to Stay 

Proceedings and directed the parties to submit a joint report stating the progress of the settlement 

negotiations by October 1, 2016. 

On October 3, 2016, the parties submitted a Third Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and 

Joint Report on Progress of Negotiations. The parties noted progress in the negotiations 

regarding 28 cases in various procedural postures. In the four cases within the exclusive 

jurisdiction of the United States District Courts, the Respondent has entered into a second tolling 
agreement with the Department of Justice through March 1, 2017. The parties requested the 

proceedings in the above captioned cases be stayed until that same date. 

Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.205(a)(8), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The parties' joint motion to stay proceedings is granted through March 1, 2017. 

2. The parties must submit a joint report stating the progress of the global settlement 

negotiations, including an indication of how much additional time, if any, the 

negotiations require, no later than March 1, 2017. 

~-- DOUGLAS M. RA WALD 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
Docket No. FAA-2014-0322 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Todd Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

444 S. River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

ONE COPY 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind A venue Southwest 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Case: 1:12-cv-02391 Document #: 6 Filed: 03/30/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:37
2432.705 Contract clauses. ( a ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 2452.232-72, “Limitation of Government's Obligation,” in solicitations and resultant incrementally funded fixed-price contracts as authorized by 2432.703-1. The Contracting Officer shall insert the information required in the table in paragraph (b) and the notification period in paragraph (c) of the clause.
( b ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 2452.232-74, “Not To Exceed Limitation” in all solicitations and contracts where the total estimated funds needed for the performance period are not yet obligated.
[81 FR 13752, Mar. 15, 2016]
#### Emma H. Johnson, Respondent-Appellant, v. Boine T. Johnson, Appellant-Respondent.

Motion by respondent-appellant to resettle order denied, with $10 costs. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emmanuel Maurice CLIFTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-4958.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 2, 2008.

Decided: June 18, 2008.

Claire J. Rauscher, Executive Director, Ross Richardson, Federal Defenders of Western North Carolina, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Maurice Clifton pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000), and was sentenced to ten months in prison. Police detained and ultimately arrested Clifton after hearing gunshots coming from the front of a residence located in a high-crime neighborhood and from which Clifton later emerged. Clifton’s guilty plea was conditioned on his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress his statement admitting to police that he fired one of the weapons heard by police, as well as the guns recovered by police after receiving his cousin’s consent to search the residence. On appeal, Clifton challenges only the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm the district court’s judgment.

This court reviews the district court’s factual findings underlying a motion to *218suppress for clear error, and the district court’s legal determinations de novo. *See United States v. Gray,*491 F.3d 138, 143-44 (4th Cir.2007) (internal citations omitted), ce*rt. denied,*— U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1226, 170 L.Ed.2d 77 (2008). When a suppression motion has been denied, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government. *See United States v. Uzenski,*434 F.3d 690, 704 (4th Cir.2006). With these standards in mind, and having reviewed the transcript of the suppression hearing and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Clifton’s motion to suppress.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Revised 03/11/2008

Case Number: Assigned/Issued By:

Judge Name: Designated Magistrate Judge:

FEE INFORMATION

Amount Due: $350.00 $39.00 $5.00

IFP No Fee Other _____________

 $455.00

Number of Service Copies ___________ Date: ______________________

(For use by Fiscal Department Only)

Amount Paid: _______________ Receipt #: __________________

Date Payment Rec’d: _____________ Fiscal Clerk: ________________

ISSUANCES

Summons Alias Summons

Third Party Summons Lis Pendens

Non Wage Garnishment Summons Abstract of Judgment

___________________________

 Wage-Deduction Garnishment Summons ___________________________

 (Victim, Against and $ Amount)

 Citation to Discover Assets

 Other

Writ _______________________ _______________________

(Type of Writ) _______________________

(Type of issuance)

 ______Original and __________ copies on ________________ as to ____________________________

 (Date)

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

12CV5598 DAJ

✔

3 3 10/31/13

BMO HARRIS BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, WELLS FARGO BANK. (THIRD PARTIES)

NO NOTICES.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
3/31/1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      11,844,000
<SECURITIES>                                11,761,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,449,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      61,965,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,606,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,980,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     21,874,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,872,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,980,000
<SALES>                                      1,583,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,742,000
<CGS>                                        1,201,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,201,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,225,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             503,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,813,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,137,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,658,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,658,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
Executive Order 13993

# Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1**                    .                     *Policy.*                     Immigrants have helped strengthen America's families, communities, businesses and workforce, and economy, infusing the United States with creativity, energy, and ingenuity. The task of enforcing the immigration laws is complex and requires setting priorities to best serve the national interest. The policy of my Administration is to protect national and border security, address the humanitarian challenges at the southern border, and ensure public health and safety. We must also adhere to due process of law as we safeguard the dignity and well-being of all families and communities. My Administration will reset the policies and practices for enforcing civil immigration laws to align enforcement with these values and priorities.                

**Sec. 2**                    .                     *Revocation.*Executive Order 13768 of January 25, 2017 (Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States), is hereby revoked. The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, and the heads of any other relevant executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall review any agency actions developed pursuant to Executive Order 13768 and take action, including issuing revised guidance, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, that advances the policy set forth in section 1 of this order.                

**Sec. 3**                    .                     *General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:*

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2021-01768

Billing code 3295-F1-P
#### William R. Nykanen, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action by a New York City Fire Department lieutenant, who was injured while fighting a fire in a condemned building owned by the defendant city, the city appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 7, 1962, upon a jury’s verdict after trial, as awarded $40,239.50 to the plaintiff against the city on the second cause of action under section 205-a of the General Municipal Law. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. We have not considered the question whether the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury that plaintiff’s disability pension was irrelevant on the question of damages. The defendant city states that it has not briefed the point in this court because of our determination in *Lehr*v. *City of New York*(16 A D 2d 702, motion for leave to appeal denied 16 A D 2d 950), and that it has merely mentioned the point in its brief only for the purpose of preserving for the Court of Appeals the issue raised thereby. However, we are constrained to observe that in its answer the city did not plead a partial defense in mitigation of damages based upon plaintiff’s receipt of a disability pension. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  545,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (62,100)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,861,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,733,600
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     236,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,861,400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             126,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>