alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 22. Detailed planar view of the seaward extension of       Middle Flats from the sidescan-sonar mosaic produced during National       Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration survey H11346. View shows high       backscatter targets interpreted to be boulders. Location of view is shown       in figure 21. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig22.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:13:05 EDT
#### 27.202-4 Refund of royalties.

The clause at 52.227-9, Refund of Royalties, establishes procedures to pay the contractor royalties under the contract and recover royalties not paid by the contractor when the royalties were included in the contractor's fixed price.
*

 Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting. 

2/18/2009 

U.S. Department of Education 

Negotiated Rulemaking 

1990 K St., NW, 8th Floor Conference Center 

Washington, D.C. 

Team III – Accreditation 

March 4, 2009, 1:00 pm – 5:00 pm 

March 5 & 6, 2009, 9:00 am – 5:00 pm 

Agenda*

Welcome 

Introductions

Overview of the Negotiated Rulemaking Process 

Review and Adopt Protocols 

Petitions for Membership 

Overview of the Accreditation Issues 

Review Agenda of Issues to be Negotiated 

Workshop-Style Review of Issues 

1. Definitions of Distance Education and Correspondence Education 

2. Accreditation Team Members 

3. Student Achievement Standard 

4. Operating Procedures – Transfer of Credit 

5. Operating Procedures – Teach-out Plan Approval 

6. Definition of Recognition 

7. Demonstration of Compliance Within 12 Months and Recognition When Not 

 Fully Compliant 

8. Recognition Procedures – Subparts C & D 

9. Direct Assessment Program Definition 
*

 Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting. 

2/18/2009 

10. Distance Education and Correspondence Education 

11. Monitoring of Institutions and Programs Throughout Period 

12. Operating Procedures – Growth Monitoring 

13. Substantive Change

14. Record Keeping and Confidentiality 

15. Due Process and Appeals 

16. Operating Procedures – Summary of Agency Actions 

Logistics 

Schedule of future meetings 

Identify additional information needs

Next Steps 

Draft Regulatory Text 

Agenda for Meeting 2: April 21 – 23, 2009 

Meeting Summary 

Other
Case: 1:12-cv-03458 Document #: 3 Filed: 05/07/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3
#### 252.236-7012 Military construction on Kwajalein Atoll—evaluation preference.

As prescribed in 236.570(c)(2), use the following provision:

# Military Construction on Kwajalein Atoll—Evaluation Preference (MAR 1998)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this provision—

(1) *Marshallese firm* means a local firm incorporated in the Marshall Islands, or otherwise legally organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, that—

(i) Is more than 50 percent owned by citizens of the Marshall Islands; or

(ii) Complies with the following:

(A) The firm has done business in the Marshall Islands on a continuing basis for not less than 3 years prior to the date of issuance of this solicitation;

(B) Substantially all of the firm's directors of local operations, senior staff, and operating personnel are resident in the Marshall Islands or are U.S. citizens; and

(C) Most of the operating equipment and physical plant are in the Marshall Islands.

(2) *United States firm* means a firm incorporated in the United States that complies with the following:

(i) The corporate headquarters are in the United States;

(ii) The firm has filed corporate and employment tax returns in the United States for a minimum of 2 years (if required), has filed State and Federal income tax returns (if required) for 2 years, and has paid any taxes due as a result of these filings; and

(iii) The firm employs United States citizens in key management positions.

(b) *Evaluation.* Offers from firms that do not qualify as United States firms or Marshallese firms will be evaluated by adding 20 percent to the offer, unless application of the factor would not result in award to a United States firm.

(c) *Status.* The offeror is ________ a United States firm; ________ a Marshallese firm; ________ Other.

(End of provision)

[63 FR 11549, Mar. 9, 1998]
25.301-2 Government support. ( a ) Generally, contractors are responsible for providing their own logistical and security support, including logistical and security support for their employees. The agency shall provide logistical or security support only when the appropriate agency official, in accordance with agency guidance, determines that— ( 1 ) Such Government support is available and is needed to ensure continuation of essential contractor services; and
( 2 ) The contractor cannot obtain adequate support from other sources at a reasonable cost.
( b ) The contracting officer shall specify in the contract, and in the solicitation if possible, the exact support to be provided, and whether this support is provided on a reimbursable basis, citing the authority for the reimbursement.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Flow International Corporation, a
Washington corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ending April
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. (S)1350), that to my
knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ STEPHEN R. LIGHT
------------------------------------
Stephen R. Light
Principal Executive Officer
July 29, 2003
**EXHIBIT12**

**CASCADENATURAL GAS CORPORATION**

**COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**ANDPREFERRED DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS**
| ** **                             | ** ** | **Twelve Months Ended**    | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                             | ** ** | **31-Mar-07**                        | ** ** | **30-Sep-06** | ** ** | **30-Sep-05** | ** ** | **30-Sep-04** | ** ** | **30-Sep-03** | ** ** | **30-Sep-02** | ** ** |
| ** **                             | ** ** | **(dollars in thousands)** | ** ** |
| Fixed charges, as  defined:            |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                       |       | $                                    | 12,190     |   | $ | 11,951 |   | $ | 11,744 |   | $ | 12,375 |   | $ | 12,363 |   | $ | 12,384 |   |
| Amortization of  debt issuance expense |       | 392                                  |       | 396 |   | 372 |   | 618 |   | 696 |   | 652 |   |
|                                   |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total fixed  charges                   |       | $                                    | 12,582     |   | $ | 12,347 |   | $ | 12,116 |   | $ | 12,993 |   | $ | 13,059 |   | $ | 13,036 |   |
|                                   |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings, as defined:                  |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                             |       | $                                    | 12,619     |   | $ | 12,489 |   | $ | 9,247 |   | $ | 13,302 |   | $ | 8,720 |   | $ | 10,458 |   |
| Add (deduct):                          |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income taxes                           |       | 9,258                                |       | 8,755 |   | 5,632 |   | 7,559 |   | 5,117 |   | 6,085 |   |
| Fixed charges                          |       | 12,582                               |       | 12,347 |   | 12,116 |   | 12,993 |   | 13,059 |   | 13,036 |   |
|                                   |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total earnings                         |       | $                                    | 34,459     |   | $ | 33,591 |   | $ | 26,995 |   | $ | 33,854 |   | $ | 26,896 |   | $ | 29,579 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to  fixed charges    |       | 2.74                                 |       | 2.72 |   | 2.23 |   | 2.61 |   | 2.06 |   | 2.27 |   |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6095
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. R. WITKOWSKI, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution; CHARLES L. BROCK, Deputy Warden; MR. ADAMS, in Mail Room at Perry Correctional Institution; MR. RUMP, in Mail Room Perry Correctional Institution; MS. MARSHALL, R.I.C. on hill, Perry Correctional Institution; MR. ROBERTSON, quit, was R.I.C. at Q-1, Perry Correctional Institution; E. DUVALL, Defendants - Appellees, and
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; U. S. GOVERNMENT, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-1794-2-21AJ) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, David Leon Morrison, John Thomas Lay, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rochester v. Witkowski , No. CA-93-1794-2-21AJ (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### 232.610 Compromising debts.

Only the department/agency contract financing offices (see PGI 232.070(c)) are authorized to compromise debts covered by this subpart. 232.617

[80 FR 58633, Sept. 30, 2015]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 1653

_____________________________ A LLEN R OBERTS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Maureen Horkan , Judge

. September 15, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , J AY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Allen Roberts, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
28.201 Requirements for security. ( a ) Agencies shall obtain adequate security for bonds (including coinsurance and reinsurance agreements) required or used with a contract for supplies or services (including construction). Acceptable forms of security include ( 1 ) corporate or individual sureties or
( 2 ) any of the types of security authorized in lieu of sureties by 28.204.
( b ) Solicitations shall not preclude offerors from using the types of surety or other security permitted by this subpart, unless prohibited by law or regulation.
[48 FR 42286, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 25530, June 21, 1990; 62 FR 44807, Aug. 22, 1997]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Rodriguez, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court convicting defendant of the crimes of robbery, first degree, grand larceny, first degree, and assault, second degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Virginia Drone Services LLC

3724 Wainfleet Drive

Richmond, VA 23235

January 13, 2016

Aircraft Information for a Phantom 3 Professional

AIRCRAFT

Weight (including battery and propellers) 1280 g

Diagonal size (including propellers) 590 mm

Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s

Max Descent Speed 3 m/s

Hover Accuracy Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/- 0.5 m

Horizontal: +/- 1.5 m

Max Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max Service Ceiling Above Sea Level 6000 m (Default altitude limit: 120 m above takeoff point)

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C

GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS

INTELLIGENT FLIGHT BATTERY

Capacity 4480 mAh

Voltage 15.2 V

Battery Type LiPo 4S
Energy 68 Wh

Net Weight 365 g

Max Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes

Operating Temperature -10°C to 40°C

Max Charging Power 100 W
Exhibit 21
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                         ------------------------------

The  following  table  provides a listing of the direct and  indirect  operating
subsidiaries  of the  Registrant,  the  percent  of  voting  stock  held  by the
Registrant,  and the jurisdiction of incorporation or organization in which each
subsidiary was incorporated or organized.

                                                                   Percentage of
                                               Jurisdiction of        Voting
                                               Incorporation      Stock held by
Subsidiaries of the Registrant                 or Organization      Registrant
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co.                  Kentucky             100%

United Bank & Trust Company                       Kentucky             100%

First Citizens Bank                               Kentucky             100%

Lawrenceburg National Bank                        Kentucky             100%

Farmers Bank and Trust Company                    Kentucky             100%

Kentucky Banking Centers, Inc.                    Kentucky             100%

FCB Services, Inc.                                Kentucky             100%

Kentucky General Holdings, LLC                    Kentucky             100%

KHL Holdings, LLC 1                               Kentucky

Kentucky Home Life Insurance Company 2            Kentucky

Kentucky General Life Insurance Company, Inc. 3   Kentucky

Leasing One Corporation 4                         Kentucky

Farmers Bank Realty Co. 4                         Kentucky

EG Properties, Inc.4                              Kentucky

Farmers Capital Insurance Corporation 4           Kentucky

Farmers Fidelity Insurance Agency, LLP 5          Kentucky

Austin Park Apartments, LTD 6                     Kentucky

Frankfort Apartments II, LTD 7                    Kentucky

EH Properties, Inc.8                              Kentucky

Pro Mortgage Partners, LLC 9                      Kentucky

Community Development of Kentucky, Inc.3          Kentucky

EV Properties, Inc. 10                            Kentucky




1    Kentucky  General  holds  a 45%  equity  and  50%  voting  interest  in KHL
     Holdings, LLC.

2    A wholly-owned subsidiary of KHL Holdings, LLC.

3    No stock issued; inactive company.

4    A wholly-owned subsidiary of Farmers Bank.

5    A fifty (50%) percent owned LLP of Farmers Insurance.

6    Farmers Bank has a 99% limited interest in this partnership.

7    Farmers Bank has a 99.9% limited interest in this partnership.

8    A wholly-owned subsidiary of First Citizens Bank.

9    A wholly-owned subsidiary of Farmers Georgetown.

10   A wholly-owned subsidiary of United Bank.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      32,818,000
<SECURITIES>                                24,142,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              176,348,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 8,403,000
<INVENTORY>                                 09,673,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           354,802,000
<PP&E>                                     322,046,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             170,087,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             748,571,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      186,532,000
<BONDS>                                     63,815,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    47,205,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 321,187,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               748,571,000
<SALES>                                    199,954,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           202,741,000
<CGS>                                       75,076,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              181,166,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,184,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,575,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,414,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,161,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,161,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Barbara Pryjda

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04206

Honorable Matthew F.

Kennelly

The Landings Homeowners Association Inc.,

et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, November 2, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Sheila Finnegan: Settlement conference held on

11/2/2012. Parties reached a settlement agreement subject to approval by the board of the

Landings Homeowners Association and the Landings Condominium Association for

Building J. The parties summarized the settlement terms on the record. The recording of

that proceeding is placed under seal until further order of court. Telephonic status hearing

set for 11/9/2012 at 1:30 p.m. for a report on whether the boards have approved the

settlement terms. If the parties report to the Court prior to 11/9/2012 that the boards have

approved the settlement terms, the telephonic status will be reset to 12/11/2012 at 9:45

a.m. Mailed notice. (is, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 26 Filed: 11/02/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:124
Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:2

Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:3

Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:5

Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:6

Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:7

Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:8

Case: 1:12-cv-05241 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/02/12 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:9
### COMMERCIAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA MEETING March.28, 1995 AGENDA
10:00 a.m . Opening Remarks /Introductions (Anthony Balducci) Purpose of Meeting Background Date for Submitting Data - April Discussion of Evaluation Criteria

12:00 noon ...... Lunch Program Organization Coverage Testing and Rating Information Program Manufacturer Participation Publicity Market Data Continuation of Program 1:00 p.m. Reconvene
2432.704-70 Incrementally funded fixed-price contracts. ( a ) Upon receipt of the contractor's notice under paragraph (c) of the clause at 2452.232-72, Limitation of Government's Obligation, the contracting officer shall promptly provide written notice to the contractor that the Government is— ( 1 ) Allotting additional funds for continued performance and increasing the Government's limitation of obligation in a specified amount;
( 2 ) Terminating the affected contract line items (CLINs) or contract, as applicable; or
( 3 ) Considering whether to allot additional funds; and ( i ) The contractor is required by the contract terms to stop work when the Government's limitation of obligation is reached; and
( ii ) Any costs expended beyond the Government's limitation of obligation are at the contractor's risk.
( b ) Upon learning that the contract will receive no further funds, the contracting officer shall promptly give the contractor written notice of the Government's decision and terminate the affected CLINs or contract, as applicable, for the convenience of the Government.
( c ) The contracting officer shall ensure that, in accordance with paragraph (b) of the clause at 2452.232-72, “Limitation of Government's obligation,” sufficient funds are allotted to the contract to cover the total amount payable to the contractor in the event of termination for the convenience of the Government.
[77 FR 73531, Dec. 10, 2012]