alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 372 

Congratulating the North Dakota State University football team for winning 

the 2017 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football 

Championship Subdivision title. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2018 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the North Dakota State University football 

team for winning the 2017 National Collegiate Athletic 

Association Division I Football Championship Subdivision title. 

Whereas the North Dakota State University (referred to in 

this preamble as ‘‘NDSU’’) Bison won the 2017 National 

Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘NCAA’’) Division I Football Championship 

Subdivision (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘FCS’’) 

title game in Frisco, Texas, on January 6, 2018, in a victory over the James Madison University Dukes by a 

score of 17 to 13; 

Whereas NDSU has now won 14 NCAA championships; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 372 ATS 

Whereas NDSU has now won its sixth NCAA Division I FCS 

championship in 7 years, an extraordinary achievement; 

Whereas NDSU has now tied the record for most NCAA Division I FCS championships with 6 in only 10 years of 

eligibility; 

Whereas the NDSU Bison have displayed tremendous resilience and skill over the past 7 seasons, with 97 wins to 

only 8 losses, including a streak of 33 consecutive wins; 

Whereas estimates state that more than 13,000 Bison fans 

attended the championship game, reflecting the tremendous spirit and dedication of Bison Nation that has 

helped propel the success of the team; and 

Whereas the 2017 NCAA Division I FCS championship was 

a victory not only for the NDSU football team, but also 

for the entire State of North Dakota: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the North Dakota State Uni3 versity Bison football team as the 2017 champions 

4 of the National Collegiate Athletic Association Divi5 sion I Football Championship Subdivision; 

6 (2) commends the North Dakota State Univer7 sity players, coaches, and staff for— 

8 (A) their hard work and dedication on a 

9 historic season; and 

10 (B) fostering a continuing tradition of ath11 letic and academic excellence; and 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 372 ATS 

1 (3) recognizes the students, alumni, and loyal 

2 fans that supported the Bison while the Bison 

3 sought to capture a sixth Division I Football Cham4 pionship Subdivision championship for North Da5 kota State University. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
The Executive Office (EO), headed by an executive officer, coordinates and executes all internal administrative matters and controls relating to OSERS in areas such as budget formulation, grants and contracts, personnel, small purchase procurement,**travel, asset management (including property and telecommunications), space alterations, and support services.
      -  BudgetPlans, formulates, and executes the administrative budget for all OSERS staff. 
      -  Information Technology (IT)Develops the annual OSERS IT budget and monitors and maintains controls of IT funds; provides assistance to OSERS staff related to IT services; and implements requirements related to IT security, asset management, and information collection. 
      -  Personnel ServicesProcesses all personnel, payroll, and training actions for OSERS staff. Serves as the adviser to the OSERS assistant secretary on OSERS personnel management, equal employment opportunity (EEO) and union activities, and is the point of coordination with other units of the Department engaged in similar activities. 
      -  Administrative ServicesManages day-to-day needs of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for a full range of services such as property, equipment, mail, and printing; oversees delegations of authority; establishes and monitors the property control system for OSERS, making periodic reports on the adequacy of operations and recommendations for improvements; maintains a system of space allocation, use, and control for all space assigned to OSERS; and ensures all travel authorizations and vouchers for OSERS staff comply with the Federal Travel Regulations and department policy. 
      -  AcquisitionsDevelops and maintains the OSERS annual acquisition plan. Serves as principal point of contact with the Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) and other Department units engaged in contracts, inter-agency agreements, small purchases, and similar acquisition activities. 
      -  Internal ControlAssists components in implementing grant-related financial policies, standards, and procedures.  

### Key Staff:

**Exective Officer:***Melanie Winston*

 Top

----

### OSERS Navigation

About OSERS | People and Offices | Programs and ProjectsGrants and Funding | Legislation and Policy | Publications, Products, Research and StatisticsAdditional Resources | Contact and Feedback
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

KEVIN A. ROY, § 

 § No. 211, 2014 

 Defendant Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court of 

 § the State of Delaware in and for 

 v. § New Castle County 

 § 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff Below, § Cr. ID No. 0503015173 

 Appellee. § 

Submitted: May 15, 2014 

Decided: June 27, 2014 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices. 

O R D E R 

 This 27th day of June 2014, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) On April 28, 2014, the Court received Kevin A. Roy’s notice of 

appeal from the Superior Court’s order dated March 24, 2014 and docketed on 

March 26, 2014 denying Roy’s motion for postconviction relief. Pursuant to 

Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(iii), the notice of appeal should have been filed on or 

before April 25, 2014.1

 

(2) On April 29, 2014, the Clerk issued a notice pursuant to Supreme 

Court Rule 29(b), directing Roy to show cause why the appeal should not be 

 

1

See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iii) (providing that an appeal from a proceeding for postconviction 

relief must be filed within thirty days after entry upon the docket of the judgment or order). 
2 

dismissed as untimely filed. In his response to the notice filed on May 9, 2014, 

Roy asserts that the delay in filing the appeal was due to the law library, business 

office and mail system in the prison where he is incarcerated. In a “motion to 

amend notice of appeal” filed on May 15, 2014, Roy appears to request an 

extension of time to file an “amended” response to the notice to show cause on the 

basis that the ten-day response period left him without sufficient time to “seek case 

law or any precedent to support his reasons for missing the deadline.” 

(3) Under Delaware law, “[t]ime is a jurisdictional requirement.”2

 A 

notice of appeal must be received by the Office of the Clerk within the time period 

to be effective.3 An untimely appeal cannot be considered unless an appellant can 

demonstrate that the failure to timely file the notice of appeal is attributable to 

court-related personnel.4

(4) In this case, Roy has not demonstrated good cause for an extension of 

time to file an amended response to the notice to show cause. Roy does not 

contend, and the record does not reflect, that his failure to file a timely notice of 

appeal is attributable to court personnel.5 Consequently, this case does not fall 

 

2 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989). 

3

 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a). 

4

Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979). 

5

See Zuppo v. State, 2011 WL 761523 (Del. March 3, 2011) (holding that prison personnel are 

not court personnel). 
3 

within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice 

of appeal. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the “motion to amend notice of 

appeal” is DENIED. Under Supreme Court Rules 6 and 29(b), the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 

 /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely

 Justice
# C_2018060EN.01000701.xml

| 16.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 February 2018

(2018/C 60/09)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2493 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4493 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88660 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9180 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1545 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 125,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,370 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,68 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1532 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6620 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,7046 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5757 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5604 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7723 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6909 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6385 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 330,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5607 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9261 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4383 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 896,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8654 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,145 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,8097 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,128 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0254 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1260 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,8490 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2493

JPY

Japanese yen

133,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4493

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88660

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9180

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1545

ISK

Iceland króna

125,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,370

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,68

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1532

RON

Romanian leu

4,6620

TRY

Turkish lira

4,7046

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5757

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5604

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7723

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6909

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6385

KRW

South Korean won

1 330,75

ZAR

South African rand

14,5607

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9261

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4383

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 896,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8654

PHP

Philippine peso

65,145

RUB

Russian rouble

70,8097

THB

Thai baht

39,128

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0254

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1260

INR

Indian rupee

79,8490

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
23.107-3 Energy-consuming products and water-consuming products. ( a ) *Authorities.* ( 1 ) Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6361(a)(1)).
( 2 ) National Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8253, 8259b, and 8262g).
( 3 ) Executive Order 11912 of April 13, 1976, Delegations of Authority under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
( 4 ) Executive Order 13221 of July 31, 2001, Energy-Efficient Standby Power Devices.
( b ) *Programs* — ( 1 ) ENERGY STAR® *Program.* The ENERGY STAR® program is a voluntary product-labeling initiative that identifies and promotes energy and water efficiency and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This joint U.S. EPA and Department of Energy program helps buyers save money and protect the environment through energy- and water-efficient products and practices.
( 2 ) *Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP).* FEMP publishes acquisition guidance to help Federal buyers meet requirements for purchasing energy-efficient and water-efficient products. In addition, in product categories not covered by the ENERGY STAR® program, FEMP sets efficiency requirements for product categories that have the potential to generate significant Federal energy savings.
( c ) *Procedures.* To the maximum extent practicable in accordance with 23.104(a), unless a justification, exception, or exemption applies (see 23.104(a), 23.105, and 23.106, respectively)— ( 1 ) When acquiring energy- and water-consuming products listed in the ENERGY STAR® Program or FEMP— ( i ) Agencies shall purchase ENERGY STAR® certified or FEMP-designated products; and
( ii ) For products that consume power in a standby mode and are listed on FEMP's Low Standby Power Devices product listing *at https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/low-standby-power-product-list ,* agencies shall— ( A ) Purchase items that meet FEMP's standby power wattage recommendation or document the reason for not purchasing such items; or
( B ) If FEMP has listed a product without a corresponding wattage recommendation, purchase items that use no more than one watt in their standby power consuming mode. When it is impracticable to meet the one-watt requirement, agencies shall purchase items with the lowest standby wattage practicable; and
( 2 ) When contracting for services or construction that will include the provision of energy- and water-consuming products, agencies shall specify products that comply with the applicable requirements in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
( d ) *Resources.* ( 1 ) For information on products under the ENERGY STAR® Program, go to *https://www.energystar.gov/products .*
( 2 ) For information on energy-efficient products, go to *https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/search-energy-efficient-products .*
( 3 ) For information on low standby power products, go to *https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/low-standby-power-product-purchasing-requirements-and-compliance-resources .*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MIKE SHALES, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION

)

v. ) NO. 12 C 4899

)

DIENST SEWER & WATER, INC., ) JUDGE MATTHEW F. KENNELLY

an Illinois corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT

NOWCOME Plaintiffs, bytheir attorneys, and move for entryof judgment bydefault against

Defendant, DIENST SEWER & WATER, INC., an Illinois corporation, in the total amount of

$30,724.91, plus Plaintiffs’ court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $7,546.00. 

On August 9, 2012, the Summons and Complaint was served on the Registered Agent (by

tendering a copy of said documents to Jeanette Goldsboro, the corporate secretary) at his place of

business (a copy of the Summons and Affidavit of Service is attached hereto). Therefore,

Defendant’s answer was due on August 30, 2012. As Defendant has failed to timely answer the

Complaint, Plaintiffs respectfully request entry of default and judgment.

/s/ Catherine M. Chapman 

Case: 1:12-cv-04899 Document #: 10 Filed: 10/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:26
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the

foregoing document (Motion) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further

certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following

non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 10th day of October 2012:

Mr. Dale L. Goldsboro, Registered Agent

Dienst Sewer & Water, Inc.

2252 N. 44th Road

Sheridan, IL 60551

Mr. Dale L. Goldsboro, Registered Agent

Dienst Sewer & Water, Inc.

2251 N. 4350th Road

Sheridan, IL 60551

/s/ Catherine M. Chapman 

Catherine M. Chapman

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6204026

Telephone: (312) 236-4316

Facsimile: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: cchapman@baumsigman.com

I:\FVLJ\Dienst Sewer\motion-default judgment.cmc.df.wpd

Case: 1:12-cv-04899 Document #: 10 Filed: 10/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:27
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02354]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration Board, Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice, regular meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(e) (1)), of the forthcoming regular 
meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board.

DATES: The regular meeting of the Board will be held February 11, 2021, 
from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board may conclude its business. 
Note: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will conduct the board 
meeting virtually. If you would like to observe the open portion of the 
virtual meeting, see instructions below for board meeting visitors.

ADDRESSES: To observe the open portion of the virtual meeting, go to 
FCA.gov, select ``Newsroom,'' then ``Events.'' There you will find a 
description of the meeting and a link to ``Instructions for board 
meeting visitors.'' See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further 
information about attendance requests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (703) 883-4009. TTY is (703) 883-4056.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public, and parts will be closed. If you wish to observe 
the open portion, follow the instructions above in the ``Attendance'' 
section at least 24 hours before the meeting. If you need assistance 
for accessibility reasons or if you have any questions, contact Dale 
Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, at (703) 
883-4009. The matters to be considered at the meeting are as follows:

OPEN SESSION

A. Approval of Minutes

<bullet> January 14, 2021

CLOSED SESSION

<bullet> OSMO Periodic Report \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 
552b(c)(8) and 9.

    Dated: February 1, 2021.
Dale Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-02354 Filed 2-1-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
3.104-9 Contract clauses. In solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, other than those for commercial products or commercial services, insert the clauses at— ( a ) 52.203-8, Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or Improper Activity; and
( b ) 52.203-10, Price or Fee Adjustment for Illegal or Improper Activity.
[67 FR 13059, Mar. 20, 2002, as amended at 86 FR 61019, Nov. 4, 2021]
Case: 1:12-cv-03648 Document #: 17 Filed: 08/28/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:79
# C_2018170EN.01000701.xml

| 17.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/7

---

Call for proposals under the multi-annual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 2226 of 19 April 2018 amending Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921)

(2018/C 170/05)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, is hereby launching a call for proposals (CEF-Transport-2018 (General envelope) in order to award grants in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the multi-annual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector.

The indicative call budget is EUR 450 million.

The deadline for the submission of proposals is 24 October 2018 (17:00 Brussels time)

The complete text of the call for proposals is available on:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-transport/apply-funding/2018-cef-transport-call-proposals.

---
Grant funds, awarded under the **IDEA**, are appropriated by Congress and are intended to support early intervention and special education services for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities and their families. 

The IDEA Part B formula grant programs (Sections **611** and **619**) assist states in providing a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment for children with disabilities ages 3 through 21. 

The IDEA **Part C grant program** supports early intervention services for infants and toddlers birth through age two and their families.

Information on these grant programs may be accessed through the following link.
      - www2.ed.gov/fund/data/award/idea/
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30682

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHEILA WALLEN HEARD,

a/k/a Sheila Clemons;

a/k/a Joan A. Hynes;

a/k/a Charlene Ourso;

a/k/a Jill Marie Heavey,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1378-D

- - - - - - - - - -

July 23, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sheila Wallen Heard, federal prisoner # 22535-034, filed a

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct

sentence by a person in federal custody arguing, among other

things, her trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to

file an appeal. This is the only issue before the court as it is
No. 97-30682

-2-

the only issue for which a certificate of appealability was

issued. 

A criminal defendant has a constitutional right to effective

assistance of counsel in his first appeal as of right. See

Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 393-95 (1985). The failure of

counsel to perfect an appeal upon request of his client may

constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States

v. Gipson, 985 F.2d 212, 215 (5th Cir. 1993). The Constitution

requires that a defendant be fully informed of his right to

appeal, including “the procedure and time limits involved and of

his right to appointed counsel on appeal.” Childs v. Collins,

995 F.2d 67, 69 (5th Cir. 1993). A petitioner may be entitled to

habeas relief if his attorney failed to inform him properly of

his appellate rights, including his right to appeal, the

procedure and time limits involved, and the right to appointed

counsel on appeal. Norris v. Wainwright, 588 F.2d 130, 134-35

(5th Cir. 1979). 

The district court did not address this aspect of the

ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Accordingly, the

dismissal of the § 2255 motion on this point is VACATED and the

case REMANDED to the district court for additional proceedings. 

Additionally, Heard’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal

is DENIED.

VACATED IN PART and REMANDED; MOTION DENIED.
28.306 Insurance under fixed-price contracts. ( a ) *General.* Although the Government is not ordinarily concerned with the contractor's insurance coverage if the contract is a fixed-price contract, in special circumstances agencies may specify insurance requirements under fixed-price contracts. Examples of such circumstances include the following: ( 1 ) The contractor is—or has a separate operation—engaged principally in Government work.
( 2 ) Government property is involved.
( 3 ) The work is to be performed on a Government installation.
( 4 ) The Government elects to assume risks for which the contractor ordinarily obtains commercial insurance.
( b ) *Work on a Government installation.* ( 1 ) When the clause at 52.228-5, Insurance—Work on a Government Installation, is required to be included in a fixed-price contract by 28.310, the coverage specified in 28.307 is the minimum insurance required and shall be included in the contract Schedule or elsewhere in the contract. The contracting officer may require additional coverage and higher limits.
( 2 ) When the clause at 52.228-5, Insurance—Work on a Government Installation, is not required by 28.310 but is included because the contracting officer considers it to be in the Government's interest to do so, any of the types of insurance specified in 28.307 may be omitted or the limits may be lowered, if appropriate.