alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2015-CE-037-AD 

if you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do no(. click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product {e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do not include on- (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing, {@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

200 hour Inspection 3.0 Only ' $50 ' 77 I 

2000 hour 3.0 . $450 77 Inspection Only 

.I ... Pll1 f 

0 :: (I ~hl 

•l 01' ' IJO{) ,. ,, .... II OL <1 1!0 I, 

,. tHH ' !1 GO ' ) 0! ~ 0 00 ' I :1 I. l C)(' "' (J(i] 1' .. 

O.IJC ":. non --=- . 

fl (I{' fl 1ifl J 

II Oi - H llli 

<. OJH :) •J(l J • 

'): () ll( n oo ( ,,, 

; 0 (II ,, 0 c:o I i 

O.Ot' 0 .i!O .(.I 

r; () (!{ 0 .0\J ' 1.(,:, 

I ('[ "': '.! 110 ' f ll 

,, (ll . n r,n f {1 

1} 'If ~ (' Ji f r,r, 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $77,770 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Gear Replacement 3.0 ~ ._'<, \I $1,450 ' ~· ' 

', l .t ,!J . {I •'J 

') r {I '• ' 

~, ).1 ~· 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • 

YES* D NO[gl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NO[gl 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. 0 

YESO NO[gl 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? @ 

YES* D NO[gi 

*Explanation:
#### Bersani Building, Inc., Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 36541.)

Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party and claim dismissed. Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings and conclusions made. Memorandum: The State appeals from that portion of the judgment which makes an award to claimant in the sum of $32,600 plus interest as damages for change of grade of Oswego Boulevard at the rear of claimant’s premises. Claimant was not *849legally or factually an abutting owner, since an 18-foot strip of land owned by the City of Syracuse intervened between the rear of claimant’s property and the right of way line of Oswego Boulevard. *(Bernhard*v. *City of Rochester,*127 App. Div. 875, affd. 194 N. Y. 566; *Peek*v. *State of New York,*15 A D 2d 443.) “ The owner of property not abutting or fronting on a street where the change of grade takes place is not entitled to any damages therefor.” *(Kansas City*v. *Brown,*286 Mo. 1, 21; *Gardner*v. *City of St. Joseph,*96 Mo. App. 657; *Smith*v. *St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co.,*39 Wash. 355; *O’Connell*v. *Seattle,*62 Wash. 218.) Nichols on Eminent Domain states the rule thus: “ So, also, it is generally considered that, in order to suffer damage in the legal sense, a parcel of land must abut upon the street which is graded.” (2 Nichols, Eminent Domain, p. 562.) (Appeal from part of judgment of Court of Claims for claimant on a claim for damages sustained as the result of change of grade and reconstruction of highway.) Present—-Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.14

                 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
           US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. NONEMPLOYEE
            DIRECTOR DEFERRED STOCK UNIT PLAN


          WHEREAS, US Airways Group, Inc. (the "Company") 
maintains the US Airways Group, Inc. Nonemployee Director 
Deferred Stock Unit Plan (the "Plan"); and

          WHEREAS, Section 7 of the Plan provides that 
the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") may 
amend the Plan from time to time, subject to the limita-
tions therein, and

          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan 
as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.             The first three (3) sentences of Section 
5(c) of the Plan are hereby amended in their entirety to 
read as follows:

          On the February 1st immediately following the 
          termination of service of an Eligible Director, 
          the Eligible Director shall receive a lump sum 
          cash payment equal to the product of (i) the 
          average of the Fair Market Value of a share of 
          Stock for the five business days immediately 
          preceding such February 1st and (ii) the number 
          of nonforfeitable Deferred Stock Units then 
          credited to such Eligible Director's account.  
          Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Eligible 
          Director may elect to receive the distribution 
          with respect to his or her account in a number 
          of annual installments commencing on the 
          February 1st immediately following the 
          termination of service of such Eligible 
          Director, the number of such annual 
          installments to be elected by the Eligible 
          Director, but in no event to exceed four.  In 
          the event an Eligible Director makes such an 
          election, the amount of each such installment 
          shall be determined based upon the average of 
          the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock for 
          the five business days immediately preceding 
          the date such installment payment is made.  Any 
          election by an Eligible Director to receive 
          distribution with respect to his or her account 
          in annual installments and with respect to the 
          number of such installments may be made or 
          changed at any time without limitation 
          provided, however, that any such election (and 
          any modification or revocation of any such 
          election) shall not be given effect unless made 
          at least forty-five days prior to the Eligible 
          Director's termination of service.

     This Second Amendment shall be effective as of March 
17, 1999, the date of its adoption by the Board.
Webinar Attendees: The Commercial Prerinse Spray Valve Framework Meeting

Meeting Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax

Bender, Sadie N/A N/A 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354 N/A N/A

Doug, Elliott N/A Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory (PNNL)

620 SW 5th Ave., Suite 

810

Portland OR 97204 N/A N/A

Faasse, Gene N/A T&S Brass and Bronze Works, Inc. 2 Saddleback Cove Travelers 

Rest

SC 29690 864-834-6737 N/A

Frunk, Don Quality Coordinator Fisher Manufacturing Co. 1900 "O" Street Tulare CA 93274 800-421-6162 N/A

Himmelblau, Larry Product Compliance, 

Engineering

The Chicago Faucet Company 2100 S. Clearwater Drive Des Plaines IL 60018 847-803-5000

x 235

847-803-5454

Hostick, Donna N/A Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle Boulevard Richland WA 99352 509-372-4323 N/A

Hussain, Najiba N/A N/A najiba.hussain@navigant.com 1200 19th St NW Washington DC 20036 N/A N/A

Johnson, Erica N/A Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354 N/A N/A

Lacovelli, Vincent N/A Kason Industries 57 Amaljack Blbd Newnan GA 30265 N/A N/A

Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy 

Coordinator

Appliance Standards Awareness 

Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NW,

Suite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4034 N/A

Stoughton, Kate 

McMordie

Engineer Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory (PNNL)

902 Battelle Boulevard, 

PO Box 999, 

MSIN K5-20

Richland WA 99352 720-379-3511 N/A

Van Eeghen, Mark N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street NW Washington DC 20009 202-973-4526 N/A
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1**  **8 70** 

H. C. THORNE, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HUNTINGTON POLICE DEPT.; W. H. (SKIP) HOLBROOK; PATROLMAN J. R. GOODMAN; PATROLMAN ANDRE JACKSON , Defendant s - Appellee s .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers , Chief District Judge. ( 3 :1 2

- cv - 0 6280 )

Submitted : September 24 , 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Hillery C. Thorne, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: H. C. Tho rne, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. A. § 636(b)(1)(B) ( West 200 6 & Supp. 2013 ). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Thorne that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1 985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Thorne has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
#### 2823.704 Electronic products environmental assessment tool.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of executing the written determination not to purchase EPEAT®-registered products.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Chase General Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Barry M. Yantis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chase General Corporation, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Barry M. Yantis               
|Barry M. Yantis                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Treasurer and Chairman of the Board  



Dated: February 9, 2006



21
252.101 Using part 252. ( b ) *Numbering.* ( 2 ) *Provisions or clauses that supplement the FAR.* ( ii ) ( B ) DFARS provisions or clauses use a four digit sequential number in the 7000 series, e.g., -7000, -7001, -7002. Department or agency supplemental provisions or clauses use four digit sequential numbers in the 9000 series.
#### 252.227-7027 Deferred ordering of technical data or computer software.

As prescribed at 227.7103-8(b), use the following clause:

# Deferred Ordering of Technical Data or Computer Software (APR 1988)

In addition to technical data or computer software specified elsewhere in this contract to be delivered hereunder, the Government may, at any time during the performance of this contract or within a period of three (3) years after acceptance of all items (other than technical data or computer software) to be delivered under this contract or the termination of this contract, order any technical data or computer software generated in the performance of this contract or any subcontract hereunder. When the technical data or computer software is ordered, the Contractor shall be compensated for converting the data or computer software into the prescribed form, for reproduction and delivery. The obligation to deliver the technical data of a subcontractor and pertaining to an item obtained from him shall expire three (3) years after the date the Contractor accepts the last delivery of that item from that subcontractor under this contract. The Government's rights to use said data or computer software shall be pursuant to the “Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software” clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 33505, June 28, 1995]
# C_2016457EN.01000101.xml

| 8.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 457/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 457/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8083 — Merck/Sanofi Pasteur MSD)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 457/01)

On 15 November 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8083. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8083. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 2909.301 Definitions.

At DOL, the *debarring official* is the SPE. At DOL, the *suspending official* is the SPE.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 3 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 12 

2 o’clock meridian unless otherwise ordered. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 484 

Supporting the designation of April 2018 as ‘‘Parkinson’s Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2018 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Ms. STABENOW) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of April 2018 as ‘‘Parkinson’s 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas Parkinson’s disease is a chronic, progressive neurological disease and is the second most common 

neurodegenerative disease in the United States; 

Whereas there is inadequate data on the incidence and prevalence of Parkinson’s disease, but it is estimated to affect 

nearly 1,000,000 individuals in the United States, with 

that number expected to more than double by 2040; 

Whereas Parkinson’s disease is the 14th leading cause of 

death in the United States according to the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention; 

Whereas millions of individuals in the United States are caregivers, family members, and friends who are greatly impacted by Parkinson’s disease; 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 484 ATS 

Whereas research suggests the cause of Parkinson’s disease 

is a combination of genetic and environmental factors, 

but the exact cause in most individuals is still unknown; 

Whereas there is currently no objective test or biomarker to 

diagnose Parkinson’s disease; 

Whereas there is no known cure or drug to slow or halt the 

progression of Parkinson’s disease, and available treatments are limited in their ability to address the medical 

needs of patients and remain effective over time; 

Whereas the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease vary from person to person and can include— 

(1) tremors; 

(2) slowness of movement and rigidity; 

(3) gait and balance difficulty; 

(4) speech and swallowing disturbances; 

(5) cognitive impairment and dementia; 

(6) mood disorders; and 

(7) a variety of other non-motor symptoms; 

Whereas volunteers, researchers, caregivers, and medical professionals are working to improve the quality of life of individuals living with Parkinson’s disease and their families; and 

Whereas increased research, education, and community support services are needed to find more effective treatments 

and to provide access to quality care to those living with 

Parkinson’s disease today: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 2018 as ‘‘Parkinson’s 

3 Awareness Month’’; 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 484 ATS 

1 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Parkinson’s 

2 Awareness Month; 

3 (3) continues to support research to find better 

4 treatments and a cure for Parkinson’s disease; 

5 (4) recognizes the individuals living with Par6 kinson’s disease who participate in vital clinical 

7 trials to advance the knowledge of the disease; and 

8 (5) commends the dedication of organizations, 

9 volunteers, researchers, and millions of individuals 

10 across the country working to improve the quality of 

11 life of individuals living with Parkinson’s disease and 

12 their families. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                  2,165
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,165
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      47
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             (1,187)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2,165
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          311
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            75
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        75
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               75
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            2.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                            2.13
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 30, 2008



/S/    Takeo
FukuiName:

Takeo FukuiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
MOLLY F IS JUSTICE 

### • Order entered November 13, 2012

In The 

## Court of Ri3peaf5 jfiftb Oifitrict of Texas; at affa55

No. 05-12-00465-CV PEGASUS TRANSPORATION GROUP INC., Appellant V. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-02008



### ORDER The Court has before it non-resident attorney Eric C. Palombo's November 8, 2012 motion for admission pro hac vice and resident practicing attorney Henry S. Wehrmann's November 8, 2012 motion in support of Mr. Palombo's motion. The Court GRANTS the motions and ADMITS Mr. Palombo to practice pro hac vice in this case.
**The "Questions and Answers on Race Discrimination" page has been revised and now resides on the "Frequently Asked Questions on Race and National Origin Discrimination" page.**

**Please update any bookmarks to reflect this new location.**

**The page you are currently on will be removed from this site May 1, 2017.**
#### In the Matter of Elias Aronson, an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement to the Bar granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin and Steuer, JJ.