alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10(p)

                               Pharmos Corporation
                         99 Wood Avenue South, Suite 301
                                Iselin, NJ 08830



                                                            As of April 14, 2000

Mr. Marvin P. Loeb
Trimedyne, Inc.
2801 Barranca Parkway
Irvine, CA 92714-5114

         Re:      Pharmos Corporation (the ACompany@)

Dear Marvin:

     I am writing to confirm our agreement relating to your outstanding warrants
and options.  You currently have 5,000 unvested  ten-year  warrants,  which were
granted in 1997 at an  exercise  price of $1.59 per share.  These  warrants  are
scheduled to vest on February 12, 2001.

     In addition,  you have 11,250  ten-year  stock  options  which were granted
under the Company=s  1997 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") in September 1998 at an
exercise  price of $1.75 per share,  of which 3,750 shares each are scheduled to
vest on September 17, 2000,  2001 and 2002. You also have 10,000  ten-year stock
options  granted under the Plan in April 1999 at an exercise  price of $1.25 per
share, of which 2,500 shares each are scheduled to vest on April 15, 2000, 2001,
2002 and 2003. The shares underlying both the warrants and options granted under
the Plan are currently registered.

     As we  discussed,  although  you  have  informed  us that  you  will not be
standing for re-election as director at the next annual meeting, you have agreed
to serve as an unpaid  consultant  on financial and  strategic  matters  through
March 31, 2001. In  connection  therewith,  you will make yourself  available by
telephone to Haim Aviv and to me and other senior management.  If we request you
to appear  periodically for meetings or the like, we will reimburse you for your
time at a mutually agreed upon level of compensation.  In consideration for your
services,  all of your  warrants and options,  as listed above (an  aggregate of
26,250  warrants/options),  will become fully vested on your last day of service
as a director,  and consistent with their existing terms,  will not expire until
90 days after the  termination  of your status as  consultant  with the Company.
This letter shall be deemed to amend your Warrant  Agreement and Option  Grants,
and except as provided herein,  such Warrant  Agreement and Option Grants remain
in full force and effect.

     Please  acknowledge  your  acceptance  of  the  foregoing  by  signing  and
returning a copy of this letter to me.

                                          PHARMOS CORPORATION

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
                                          /s/ Gad Riesenfeld
                                          ------------------
                                          By: Gad Riesenfeld
/s/ Marvin P. Loeb                        President and Chief Operating Officer
------------------
Marvin P. Loeb
Case: 1:12-cv-04493 Document #: 24 Filed: 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:214

Case: 1:12-cv-04493 Document #: 24 Filed: 08/16/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:215
## Tej-Jet Inc. 98 BYRAM SHOREROAD

GREENWICH, CT 06830 Email:jackbart36@gmail.com Cell: (203) 921-6400 6/3/2015 US Department ofTransportation,Docket Operations West Building, Ground Floor, RoomW 12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Request for Exemption

To WhomIt May Concern, V!a Certified Receipt Mail

I ama "person" and owner/officer, requesting an exemption registered in the corporation Tej-Jet Inc, for my Morane SaulnierMS760 aircraft, bearing Serial# 2, at 98 ByramShore Road Greenwich, CT 06830. This is an exemption to 14CFR, FederalAviation Regulation 91.881, Civil subsonicjet airplanes weighing 75,000 pounds orless. This regulation is in regard to stage 3 noise compliance. Effective date December 31,2015. In the docket for rule making for this regulatory change, this make and model was excluded fromthe FAA analysis. The docket number is FAA-2013-0503; Arndt. No. 91.328. This make and model airplane has a gross weight of8,750 pounds and thereby is a small aircraft, under 12,500 pounds. This aircraft is a twin enginejet powered airplane. This airplane was certified in the United States July 1958. Type Certificate number 7A3. This airplane is clearly listed in FAA Advisory Circular 36-3H. change 1, dated 5/25/2012, Estimated Airplane Noise Levels in A-Weighed Decibels. The dataprovided in this ACwas provided by DGAC (FrenchAviation Authority) as noted inthe AC. The noise levels are within the stage 3 noise compliance requirements. The operation ofthese aircraft 

### will not be in any conflict with stage 3 noise regulations. The FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual does not contain dataregarding Stage 3 compliance. The present flight manual is dated April1963. This exemption has no effect on safety. This airplane is the first Very Light Jet 

### (VU) and has historicalroots. These airplanes operate for personaltransportation oftheir respective owners and also are frequently takento "Airshows" for display to the generalpublic. This newregulation takes effect December 31,2015. Exemption to this regulation is needed before this date to allowfor recurrent training and nonnal operations ofthese airplanes in the National Airspace System Summary: An Exemption is hereby granted to Morane SaulnierMS760, Serial #2, owned by Tej-Jet Inc. at 98 ByramShore Road Greenwich, CT 06830, and this exemption is to operatethis Morane SaulnierMS760 series aircraft to and from any suitable airports in the contiguous United States. Thankyou foryourassistance in this matter.
# C_2017214EN.01000201.xml

| 4.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 July 2017

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 July 2017

(2017/C 214/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1369 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4366 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87705 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6358 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0943 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5065 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,140 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,25 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2355 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5634 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0322 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4848 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4755 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8778 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5584 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5709 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 305,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9926 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7253 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4215 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 223,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8942 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,553 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 67,4684 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,632 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7737 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7257 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,7370 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1369

JPY

Japanese yen

128,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4366

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87705

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6358

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0943

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5065

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,140

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,25

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2355

RON

Romanian leu

4,5634

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0322

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4848

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4755

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8778

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5584

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5709

KRW

South Korean won

1 305,91

ZAR

South African rand

14,9926

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7253

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4215

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 223,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8942

PHP

Philippine peso

57,553

RUB

Russian rouble

67,4684

THB

Thai baht

38,632

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7737

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7257

INR

Indian rupee

73,7370

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
The Newcomer Tool Kit is designed to help U.S. educators; elementary  and secondary teachers, principals, and other school staff who work directly  with immigrant students—including asylees and refugees—and their families. 

The **Newcomer Tool Kit** has 5 chapters, and contains an **overview, sample tools, and resources**. 

UpdatedDownload the entire Newcomer Tool Kit (PDF, 4 MB)

###  

### Newcomer Toolkit - Chapters:

-  Who are our Newcomers?  **Welcoming Newcomers to a Safe and Thriving School Environment**  **Supporting Newcomers' Social, Emotional, and Mental Health Needs**  **Providing High-Quality Instruction for Newcomers**  **Establishing Partnerships with Families**   To request the tool kit in an alternate format as a reasonable accommodation, i.e. large print, CD Rom or audio, please contact Melissa Escalante by  phone, 202-401-1407 or email at: **Melissa.Escalante@ed.gov**.            Last Modified: 07/10/2023
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 47 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:173
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 47 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:174
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 47 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:175
#### 252.237-7016 Delivery tickets.

*Basic.* As prescribed in 237.7101(e) and (e)(1), use the following clause:

# Delivery Tickets—Basic (NOV 2014)

(a) The Contractor shall complete delivery tickets in the number of copies required and in the form approved by the Contracting Officer, when it receives the articles to be serviced.

(b) The Contractor shall include one copy of each delivery ticket with its invoice for payment.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I.* As prescribed in 237.7101(e) and (e)(2), use the following clause, which includes paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) not included in the basic clause:

# Delivery Tickets—Alternate I (NOV 2014)

(a) The Contractor shall complete delivery tickets in the number of copies required and in the form approved by the Contracting Officer, when it receives the articles to be serviced.

(b) The Contractor shall include one copy of each delivery ticket with its invoice for payment.

(c) Before the Contractor picks up articles for service under this contract, the Contracting Officer will ensure that—

(1) Each bag contains only articles within a single bag type as specified in the schedule; and

(2) Each bag is weighed and the weight and bag type are identified on the bag.

(d) The Contractor shall, at time of pickup—

(1) Verify the weight and bag type and record them on the delivery ticket; and

(2) Provide the Contracting Officer, or representative, a copy of the delivery ticket.

(e) At the time of delivery, the Contractor shall record the weight and bag type of serviced laundry on the delivery ticket. The Contracting Officer will ensure that this weight and bag type are verified at time of delivery.

(End of clause)

*Alternate II.* As prescribed in 237.7101(e) and (e)(3), use the following clause, which includes paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) not included in the basic clause:

# Delivery Tickets—Alternate II (NOV 2014)

(a) The Contractor shall complete delivery tickets in the number of copies required and in the form approved by the Contracting Officer, when it receives the articles to be serviced.

(b) The Contractor shall include one copy of each delivery ticket with its invoice for payment.

(c) Before the Contractor picks up articles for service under this contract, the Contracting Officer will ensure that each bag is weighed and that the weight is identified on the bag.

(d) The Contractor, at time of pickup, shall verify and record the weight on the delivery ticket and shall provide the Contracting Officer, or representative, a copy of the delivery ticket.

(e) At the time of delivery, the Contractor shall record the weight of serviced laundry on the delivery ticket. The Contracting Officer will ensure that this weight is verified at time of delivery.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 3416, Jan. 23, 2006; 79 FR 65594, Nov. 5, 2014; 80 FR 36900, June 26, 2015]
Current Conditions

Season Weather Averages

Jacksonville International (KJAX)

Graphs of yearly temperature, rainfall, and snowfall.

- Show Last Year

- Show Normals/Averages

- Show Records

Average High/Low Temperatures for KJAX : Weather Underground Page 1 of 3

http://www.wunderground.com/NORMS/DisplayNORMS.asp?AirportCode=KJAX&SafeCityNa... 10/20/2011
Average High/Low Temperatures for KJAX : Weather Underground Page 2 of 3

http://www.wunderground.com/NORMS/DisplayNORMS.asp?AirportCode=KJAX&SafeCityNa... 10/20/2011
Average High/Low Temperatures for KJAX : Weather Underground Page 3 of 3

http://www.wunderground.com/NORMS/DisplayNORMS.asp?AirportCode=KJAX&SafeCityNa... 10/20/2011
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BIDWELL v. PITTS, Sheriff.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 19, 1906.)

Appeal from Special Term, Albany County.

Proceedings by the people, on the relation of William Bidwell, for a writ of habeas corpus, against Sebastian W. Pitts, as sheriff of Albany county. From an order discharging relator from custody, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before PARKER, P. J., and SMITH, CHESTER, KELLOGG, and COCHRANE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, writ of habeas corpus quashed, and relator remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Albany county, as custodian of the penitentiary, to serve balance of his term, on the authority of People ex rel. George Bidwell v. Pitts, as sheriff, etc, (decided at this term) 97 N. Y. Supp. 509.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-10235

Summary Calendar

__________________

CALEB O. ADONGO,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAVID W. WILLIAMS, Sheriff, Tarrant County, Texas;

COUNTY COMMISSIONER, Tarrant County, Texas,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CV-765-A

- - - - - - - - - -

September 29, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Caleb O. Adongo, a pretrial detainee at the Tarrant County

(Tex.) Jail, appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment to the defendants in his civil rights action, filed

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This court may affirm the district court’s order on any

ground apparent from the record. See Sojourner T v. Edwards, 974
2

F.2d 27, 30 (5th Cir. 1992). In this case, Adongo has failed to

allege how the named defendants were personally involved in the

wrongdoing he alleges; he has asserted that jail employees fed

him and other inmates servings of cake, baked by a private

corporation, that had been contaminated with a cleaning product.

See Woods v. Edwards, 51 F.3d 577, 583 (5th Cir. 1995).

Individual liability under § 1983 may not be predicated on the

vicarious-liability doctrine of respondeat superior. See Coleman

v. Houston Indep. Sch. Dist., 113 F.3d 528, 534 (5th Cir. 1997). 

For the first time on appeal, Adongo raises a speedy-trial claim. 

Such a claim is in the nature of a habeas corpus claim because it

is a challenge to the fact or duration of his confinement and

must be brought in a habeas proceeding. See Cook v. Texas Dep’t

of Crim. Justice Transitional Planning Dep’t, 37 F.3d 166, 168

(5th Cir. 1994) (citing Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484

(1973)).

AFFIRMED.
Subisdy rates under the FY 2023 Financial Statements for 4 recent cohorts of loans, by loan type

Estimates are from Financial Statements 2023

2018 2019 2020 2021

Subsidized Undergraduate Loans 26.95% 22.51% 18.79% 21.42%

Unsubsidzed Undergraduate and Graduate Loans 22.56% 20.88% 18.79% 19.36%

PLUS (Parent) -10.55% -12.37% -14.15% -16.02%

PLUS (Grad) 21.30% 19.90% 17.32% 17.11%

Consolidation 44.88% 44.82% 33.95% 38.22%

2018 2019 2020 2021

Subsidized Undergraduate Loans 20,223,819,198 19,550,000,035 17,050,358,372 16,191,788,260

Unsubsidzed Undergraduate and Graduate Loans 48,091,673,978 47,973,938,545 46,365,549,406 45,595,523,052

PLUS (Parent) 12,666,505,407 12,802,614,832 10,246,174,930 10,485,047,040

PLUS (Grad) 10,504,954,596 11,185,599,404 11,329,526,850 12,187,717,536

Consolidation 41,622,927,229 39,889,833,873 30,404,947,158 21,656,004,080

Includes only Direct Loans

Loan cohort

Loan cohort
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

# **Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

#  

Aspyra, Inc.

Calabasas, CA

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-71599and file No. 333-138795) and on Forms S-3 (File No. 33-89278 and fileNo. 333-134926) of our report dated March 31, 2008, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of Aspyra, Inc. appearing in the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

BDO Seidman, LLP

 

Los Angeles, California

March 31, 2008

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 28776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12231]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0909; FRL-8873-4]

Pesticide Reregistration Performance Measures and Goals; 
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of March 2, 2011, 
concerning the Agency's progress in meeting its performance measures 
and goals for pesticide reregistration during fiscal years 2009 and 
2010. This document is being issued to correct two typographical 
errors.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol P. Stangel, Pesticide Re-
evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8007; e-mail 
address: stangel.carol@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    The Agency included in the notice a list of those who may be 
potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding 
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0909. Publicly available 
docket materials are available either in the electronic docket at 
http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the 
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, 
VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. 
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket 
Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

II. What does this correction do?

    The preamble in FR Doc. 2011-4649, published in the Federal 
Register of March 2, 2011 (76 FR 11456) (FRL-8859-4), is corrected as 
follows:
    1. On page 11458, Table 1, second column, first entry, correct 
``697'' to read ``679.''
    2. On page 11459, Table 1, second column, second entry, correct 
``1,214'' to read ``1,196.''

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: May 5, 2011.
William L. Jordan,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-12231 Filed 5-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### Sidney Heller, Respondent, v. Josephthal & Company, Appellant.

Order, entered on May 22, 1964, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for rescission because of failure to prosecute, unanimously reversed on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs.. The action was commenced March 21, 1960 and issue joined on April 21, 1960. Pretrial examinations were completed in November, 1960. A note of issue for the June 1961 Term was served but not filed. Nothing has been done since that time. The alleged excuse for delay is that the firm handling plaintiff’s case was dissolved in 1961 and the file misplaced. The action seeks to rescind a sale of stock which plaintiff claims he bought on defendant’s representation that they had inside information that the stock would go up. The stock was purchased at 19 and was selling at *lQ1/^*at the time the note of issue was served. No substantial reason is submitted for the delay, and the affidavit of merit is insufficient. The motion to dismiss should have been granted. (See *Sortino*v. *Fisher,*20 A D 2d 25.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
# C_2016409EN.01000301.xml

| 5.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 409/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Andorra

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 25th anniversary of the Radio and Television of Andorra

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows a microphone and an antenna circled by several circular lines with the inscription ‘25è ANIVERSARI DE RÀDIO I TELEVISIÓ D’ANDORRA’, the year of issuance ‘2016’ and the name of the State of issuance ‘ANDORRA’. This commemorative coin celebrates the 25th anniversary of the establishment of the Andorran public media with the beginning of the broadcast of the Andorran public radio and public television.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of mintage
  : December 2016

Date of mintage

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---