alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 307 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 307

       Designating October 26, 2017, as ``Day of the Deployed''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 25, 2017

  Mr. Hoeven (for himself, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Peters, Mr. Roberts, Mr. 
 Tester, and Ms. Warren) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating October 26, 2017, as ``Day of the Deployed''.

Whereas more than 2,000,000 individuals serve as members of the Armed Forces of 
        the United States;
Whereas several hundred thousand members of the Armed Forces rotate each year 
        through deployments to 150 countries in every region of the world;
Whereas more than 2,900,000 members of the Armed Forces have deployed to the 
        area of operations of the United States Central Command since the 
        September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks;
Whereas the United States is kept strong and free by the loyal military 
        personnel from the total force (the regular components, the National 
        Guard, and the Reserves), who protect the precious heritage of the 
        United States through their declarations and actions;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces serving at home and abroad have courageously 
        answered the call to duty to defend the ideals of the United States and 
        to preserve peace and freedom around the world;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces personify the virtues of patriotism, 
        service, duty, courage, and sacrifice;
Whereas the families of members of the Armed Forces make important and 
        significant sacrifices for the United States; and
Whereas the Senate designated October 26 as ``Day of the Deployed'' in 2011, 
        2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 26, 2017, as ``Day of the 
        Deployed'';
            (2) honors the deployed members of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States and the families of the members;
            (3) calls on the people of the United States to reflect on 
        the service of those members of the Armed Forces, wherever the 
        members serve, past, present, and future; and
            (4) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the Day of the Deployed with appropriate ceremonies and 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```
Series TradeName AltSeriesName AltSeriesNumber

58MCA Bryant 340MAV 340MAV

58MSA Bryant 345MAV 345MAV

58MXA Bryant Plus 90 350MAV

58MTA Bryant 90t 352MAV

58MVP Bryant Plus 90i 355MAV

ABA Airtemp AABA/AADA

CSA Airtemp ACSA/ACCA

VSA Airtemp AVSA/AVCA

ABA Eubank EABA/EADA

CSA Eubank ECSA/FCCA

VSA Eubank EVSA/EVCA

ABA Fedders FABA/FADA

CSA Fedders FCSA/FCCA

VSA Fedders FVSA/FVCA

ABA Texas Furnace TBA/TDA

CSA Crown DSA/DCA

VSA Crown USA/UVA

ABA Crown MBA/MDA

CMPB Aire-Flo Aire-Flo 90 Gas 

Furnaces AF90MPPB

CMPB Service Experts ProSeries PSCMPB

MPGA Aire-Flo Aire-Flo 80 AF80MPA

MPGA Service Experts Pro Series PSMPGA

FPBB Service Experts Pro Series PSFPBB
Notes

25-year limited warranty on heat exchangers

Satisfies California Air Quality Standards
14910-13-Pj



### (DOT). 14CFR Part 39 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Feder-al Aviation Administr-ation



# \ID" IDocket No. FAA-2010-*****j Directorat.e ldentifier 2010-NM-237-AD;



## I{A5D~ 

## ;l..3-IQ Amendment 

### 39-Y ; AD 2010-** -**1 RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2Cl 0 (Regional Jet Serie 700,701, 

### & 702), Model CL·600·2DI5 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600·2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes 

### AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation ACTION: Final rule; request forcomments. oounNG SVMOOI, SUMi\1ARY: We arc adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lis. I~l='(i above. This AD results from mandatory continuing aif\Vorthiness infonnation (MeAl) OAT •• originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsare RIJUTlNG5V""0L

the MCAI. condition on an aviation product. The 

### MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in Preliminary investigation has shown that interference between the MLG door and the MLG fairing seal prevented the MLG door from opening. INIn~1 SlSIG U~T~ flOUTING SV"llOL 1'ITl~LSISIG n SYMIlOINm~IS!S1G ~1f. 

## * * * * 

## * * 

## * Two cases of main landing gear (MLG) failure to fully extend have been reported. An MLG failing to extend may result in an unsare asymmetnc landing configuration.Ainnlrtllincss Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL·600-2CIO (Regional.lct Series [0 21 ;ZOjO "'

# . ., .",' ",,- ANli-1711 

### ""'...,."'. A G~II" 

# " ''',' IUN 2120·.o\A64 14

## ern I'art 39 Federal Aviation AdministratiOIl (Docket No. FAA-2010-HH';'; Directorate Identifier ZOIO-N1\'1-237-AD; DEPARTMENT OFTRAJ'\'SPORTATION

,\mcndroent 39-*••••

**; AD2010-••••

••••• )
700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2DI5 (Regional .Tet Scric~ 705), and Model >1);""'(;" u"" ."Ni:-171) CL-600-1D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes ACENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DepClrlm••• ntofTransportation (DOT). .01:'•.•.• ".••. "'." I.GlI ,\1:(. ""II••• O~". ACTIOi\': Final rule; request forcomments. SUMMARY: We arc adopting anew airworthiness direclive (AD) for(heproducts lisLed abovc-.lllis AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonmllion (MeAl) 

### '''''''.'><'' originated by all nviation authority ofanother country to identify ondcorn~clan Utl:jaJe 

### ,

# .." condition 0.11 an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe conditiotlllS: Two cuses o(:.mainlanding gear (Ml.G) raitun: to fully extend have been reported. A;<MLG failing to extend mayresult inonunsafe asynm1ctric landing configuration. 

### N'....•. <''': Preliminary investigation has ShO\""l that interference between thc Ml.G door and the MLG fairing seal prevented the MLG door from opening. ,..,,, •••••• lG 

## • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • ",0" This AD requires actions that are intcnded to address thc unsate condition described in
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagle’s, Inc. for the period ended July 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagle’s, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  

1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  

2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

Date: August 10, 2004  
By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle  
J. Douglas Cagle  
Chief Executive Officer  

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagle’s, Inc. for the period ended July 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagle’s, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  

1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  

2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

Date: August 10, 2004  
By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV  
Mark M. Ham IV  
Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-17925, 33-78562, 33-61712, 33-64205, 333-17131,
333-45381, 333-33300) and on Form S-3 (No. 33-61712) of ELXSI Corporation of our
reports dated April 23, 2002 relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
---------------------------------
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Tampa, Florida
April 23, 2002
');
	document.write('

*Today, the Administration released the fiscal year 2024 budget request for the U.S. Department of Education. “The investments proposed in President Biden’s new budget reflect this Administration’s deep belief in education as the foundation of all opportunity in America. It is my hope that Congress answers the President’s call for continued investments that will help schools, parents, families, and communities raise the bar in education by promoting academic excellence, accelerating learning, building safe and supportive school communities, and addressing major challenges like the educator shortage, the mental health and well-being of our students, and access to high-quality early learning programs. The President’s budget would also expand career-connected learning in our schools and provide more pathways to well-paying careers, as well as raise the bar for college affordability, inclusive student success, and driving more equitable outcomes in higher education,” said Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona.*

The following materials show what this budget provides for the programs and activities of the Department of Education:

- Press Release
- *The FY 2024 Education Budget Summary and Background Information [**PDF**, 447K] provides program information and detailed budget tables.
- *The FY 2024 Education Budget Key Highlights [**PDF**, 714K]
- FY 2024 Justifications of Appropriations Estimates to the Congress

### FY 2024 Budget for the entire U.S. Government

- The President’s FY 2024 Budget for the entire United States Government

**The Department of Education strives to make all content accessible to everyone. While these documents do not currently meet the standards of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Budget Service (BS), Budget Policy and Coordination Division is working to create accessible versions.  If you need access to these documents before the accessible versions are available, please contact the Information Technology Accessibility Program Helpdesk at ITAPSUPPORT@ed.gov* to help facilitate.
June 24, 2015 

Mr. Edward Stanza 

1954 Argyle Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90068 

Dear Mr.Stanza : 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 5, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2136), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply 

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 31.2

                     RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION

I, Xue Bu, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cybrdi, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with
   respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer
   as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and the internal control over
   financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
   for the issuer and have:

   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal
      quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
      report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting;
      and

5. The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
   issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors
   (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
      affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and

   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
      over financial reporting.


August 20, 2007

                                          By: /s/ Xue Bu
                                              ----------
                                                  Xue Bu
                                                  Principal Financial Officer
# C_2017330EN.01000101.xml

| 2.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 330/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 318, 25.9.2017

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 309, 18.9.2017

OJ C 300, 11.9.2017

OJ C 293, 4.9.2017

OJ C 283, 28.8.2017

OJ C 277, 21.8.2017

OJ C 269, 14.8.2017

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
## Program Authority

20 U.S.C. 1463 and 1481 of the *Individuals with Disabilities Education Act*. 

## Applicable Regulations

      - The Education Department General Administrative Regulations ( EDGAR ) in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. .  
      -  The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485.  
      -  The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474.

 The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants except federally recognized Indian tribes. The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only.
242.503-2 Post-award conference procedure. ( a ) DD Form 1484, Post-Award Conference Record, may be used in conducting the conference and in preparing the conference report.
( b ) For contracts that include the clause at 252.234-7004, Cost and Software Data Reporting, postaward conferences shall include a discussion of the contractor's standard cost and software data reporting (CSDR) process that satisfies the guidelines contained in the DoD 5000.04-M-1, CSDR Manual, and the requirements in the Government-approved CSDR plan for the contract, DD Form 2794, and related Resource Distribution Table.
[70 FR 67920, Nov. 9, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 71562, Nov. 24, 2010]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30814 Summary Calendar

HERMAN JOHNSON, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JOHN P. WHITLEY, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-3980-E

- - - - - - - - - - December 19, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Herman Johnson, Jr., Louisiana state prisoner #121967, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He has filed a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5thNo. 96-30814 - 2 - Cir. 1987). Johnson did not file a notice of appeal from the district court’s denial of his habeas petition. Although he refiled his original § 2254 petition one year after the court’s judgment, his habeas petition is ineffective to serve as a notice of appeal because it did not “clearly evince an intent to appeal.” See id. To the extent that any documents subsequently filed by Johnson evince an intent to appeal, they are untimely as they were filed more than thirty days after the district court’s entry of final judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite for the exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v. Carr , 979 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992). Because Johnson did not file a timely notice of appeal, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction. Johnson’s motion for IFP is therefore DENIED as unnecessary and his appeal is DISMISSED.
## Legislation

- Title III, Part A, Sec. 311-315  of the Higher Education Act ( HEA ) of 1965, as amended.
- 20 U.S.C. 1057-1059b

## Regulations

- Title 34 Part 607
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

## Guidance

- Office of Management and Budget (OMB)  Guidance for Grants and Agreements, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards

Institutional Service Home
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00578

- CV

IN RE Raymond Payton TAYLOR

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On S eptember 15, 2015

, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is D ENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on September 23, 2015

.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014

- CI

- 05326, styled Raymond Payt on Taylor v. Wanda Swim and Jamie

Hogue , pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn

presiding.
## Key Staff:

HSI Division Director - **Stacey A. Slijepcevic, Ph.D.**(202) 453-6150 | stacey.slijepcevic@ed.gov

Program Lead Jymece.Seward@ed.gov | (202) 453-6138

| **Kurrinn M. Abrams**(202) 453-7906kurrinn.abrams2@ed.gov | **Njeri Clark**(202) 453-6224njeri.clark@ed.gov | **Robin Dabney**(202) 453-7908robin.dabney@ed.gov | **Richard Gaona**(202) 453-6077richard.gaona@ed.gov |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

**Mailing Address:**

U.S. Department of Education, OPEHigher Education ProgramsInstitutional ServiceHispanic-Serving Institutions Program400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., 4th FloorWashington, DC 20202

Institutional Service Home