alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 911 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue 

an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2017 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saracini Aviation Safe5 ty Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 911 IS

1 the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue an order 

2 that requires— 

3 (1) on each covered aircraft the installation of 

4 a barrier, other than the cockpit door, that prevents 

5 access to the flight deck of the aircraft; and 

6 (2) for a covered aircraft— 

7 (A) that is equipped with a cockpit door, 

8 that the barrier required under paragraph (1) 

9 remain locked while— 

10 (i) the aircraft is in flight; and 

11 (ii) the cockpit door separating the 

12 flight deck and the passenger area is open; 

13 and 

14 (B) that is not equipped with a cockpit 

15 door, that the barrier required under paragraph 

16 (1) remain locked as determined appropriate by 

17 the pilot in command. 

18 (b) COVERED AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, 

19 the term ‘‘covered aircraft’’ means a commercial air20 craft— 

21 (1) operating under part 121 of title 14, Code 

22 of Federal Regulations; 

23 (2) equipped with more than 75 passenger 

24 seats; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 911 IS

1 (3) with a maximum gross takeoff weight that 

2 exceeds 75,000 pounds. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### 2452.216-74 Distribution of award fee.

As prescribed in 2416.406(e)(3), insert the following clause in all award fee contracts:

# Distribution of Award Fee (FEB 2006)

(a) The total amount of award fee available under this contract is assigned to the following evaluation periods in the following amounts:

Evaluation Period: [*insert time period*]

Available Award Fee: [*insert dollar amount*]

(b) In the event of contract termination, either in whole or in part, the amount of award fee available shall represent a pro-rata distribution associated with evaluation period activities or events as determined by the Fee Determination Official as designated in the contract.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (FEB 2006). As prescribed in 2416.406(e)(3), add paragraph (c):

(c) The contract clauses required for cost-reimbursement contracts shall be modified for use under award fee contracts as cited below:

(1) The term “base fee and award fee” shall be substituted for “fixed fee” where it appears in the clause at FAR 52.243-2, Changes—Cost Reimbursement.

(2) The term “base fee” shall be substituted for “fee” where it appears in the clauses at FAR 52.232-20, Limitation of Costs, and FAR 52.232-22, Limitation of Funds.

(3) The phrase “base fee, if any, and such additional fee as may be awarded as provided for in the Schedule” shall be substituted for the term “fee” whenever it appears in the clause at FAR 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment.

(End of clause)

[71 FR 2438, Jan. 13, 2006]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                     SATURN ELECTRONICS & ENGINEERING, INC.
                       WARRANT TO PURCHASE 495,688 SHARES
                       OF CLASS B NONVOTING COMMON STOCK


     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SATURN ELECTRONICS & ENGINEERING, INC. WARRANT TO
PURCHASE 495,688 SHARES OF CLASS B NONVOTING COMMON STOCK (hereinafter
"Amendment"), is made as of this 24th day of March, 2000 by and between
Motorola, Inc. (the "Holder"), and Saturn Electronics & Engineering, Inc., a
Michigan corporation (the "Company").

     WHEREAS, on March 15, 2000, Holder acquired from the Company a Warrant to
Purchase 495,688 Shares of Class B Nonvoting Common Stock (the "Warrant"); and

     WHEREAS, Holder and Company desire to amend the Warrant as set forth in
this Amendment.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Warrant and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged,
Holder and Company amend the Warrant as follows:

     The Title ad Preamble on the first page of the Warrant are amended to
change the number of Class B Nonvoting Common Shares available for subscription
and purchase from 495,688 to 521,777.

     All other terms and provisions of the Warrant remain in full force and
effect and are hereby affirmed.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date
written above.




Holder:                                      Company:

MOTOROLA, INC.                               SATURN ELECTRONICS &
                                             ENGINEERING, INC.



By:  /s/ Carl F. Koenamann                  By: /s/ W. Tsuha
   ------------------------------------         ---------------------

Title: Executive Vice President and CEO      Title: President
       --------------------------------             -----------------
Comprehensive Conservation Plan

Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex

September 2007

Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex

223 North Shore Road 

Medicine Lake, MT 59247

406/789 2305

and

Region 6, Mountain–Prairie Region

Division of Refuge Planning

134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300

Lakewood, CO 80228

303/236 4365

Comprehensive Conservation Plan Approval

Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex

Submitted by:

__________________________________ ________________

Jerry Rodriquez Date

Project Leader

Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex

Medicine Lake, MT

Concurred with:

__________________________________ ________________

Dean Rundle 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6

Lakewood, CO

and

__________________________________ ________________

Richard A. Coleman, Ph.D. Date

Assistant Regional Director

National Wildlife Refuge System

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6

Lakewood, CO
(April 23, 1962)

#### Helen Perkins, as Administratrix of the Estate of Donald A. Perkins, Deceased, Respondent, v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant, and Kenneth Burnham, Respondent.

Appeal withdrawn, upon stipulation, and remitted to the Supreme Court of Madison County for further proceeding. Order entered. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DAMIAN A. PARKER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D20-954

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 16, 2020.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; Keith Spoto, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); Lindquist v. 

State, 155 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Durant v. State, 177 So. 3d 995 (Fla. 5th 

DCA 2015) (en banc); Walden v. State, 112 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Haynes v. 

State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### Samuel Schwartz et al., Appellants, v. Travelers Hotel, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In an action for an accounting and for other incidental relief, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 21, 1963, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency “ without prejudice to whatever other rights plaintiffs may possess” (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The action is based on a written agreement between the parties, dated March 19, 1956. This agreement was a stockholders’ agreement and not one for a joint venture. While plaintiffs may have a stockholders’ derivative action for the alleged waste and conversion by the individual defendant, plaintiffs are not entitled to any relief in this action for an accounting on the *theory*of breach of the fiduciary obligation arising from a joint venture. (For related appeals, see *Fromhin*v. *Merrall Really,*15 A D 2d 919, affg. 30 Mise 2d 288, motion for leave to appeal denied 11 N Y 2d 647; *Matter of Schwartz*v. *Travelers Hotel,*7 A D 2d 848.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Due to the use of Flash in the "You are Here" web-site the whole of the Flash based sited has not been captured. However the entirety of the html based site has been captured and is available here: ~/lps124525/lps124525/www.consumer.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/games/off-site/youarehere/pages/htmlsite/index.html.
#### James F. Malcolm, Appellant, *v.*Henry F. Hamill. In the matter of the Receivership of Charles W. Dayton, Respondent.

(Submitted June 19, 1883 ;

decided June 26, 1883.)

*Stern & Myers*for appellant.

*John H. Cole*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.

Order affirmed.
September 20, 2018

Dear Educator:

The  U.S. Department of Education (Department) is working hard to assist those areas  affected by Hurricane Florence. Our immediate concern is for the safety and  well-being of all who are affected by this hurricane and the resulting catastrophic  flooding, particularly those who have suffered the loss of their homes, schools  and businesses, and must deal with displacement and trauma. President Trump has  directed Federal agencies to work together to remove barriers and to expedite  the work necessary to recover from Florence and its impact. To that end, senior  leadership at the Department reached out to States under threat from Florence  prior to its landfall, and the Department continues to work closely with other  Federal, State and local agencies to help with recovery efforts. 

The  first steps in a successful recovery are to assess each State's needs and to  relieve burdens for students, families and educational institutions in North  Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia, as well as other States that may receive  displaced students or be otherwise impacted. To assist you in this process, the  Department is providing the attached initial guidance that explains available  waivers from Federal requirements in certain Department programs and other  potential forms of relief. This guidance provides State educational agencies,  local educational agencies, Bureau of Indian Education-funded schools,  postsecondary institutions and other Department grantees and program  participants, including charter schools and nonpublic schools, with information  about the flexibility that is available to help maintain continuity of  operations and education during a period of recovery. We recognize that some  communities face more immediate concerns, but we encourage you to consider the  flexibilities and support that you may need. The Department is here to help.

For  children of affected families, returning to school can provide stability in a  time of upheaval. The Department stands ready to provide whatever flexibility  and support it can to help ensure all children, particularly those in the  hurricane-impacted areas, receive a quality education.

As you  assess the damage and your recovery needs, please continue to reach out to the  Department—the attached guidance includes a variety of ways to do so—and do not hesitate  to let us know your needs and what other questions you may have as your  assessments and recovery efforts continue.

The  entire Department team and I look forward to working with all of you in the  coming days, weeks and months on this critical effort. Please know that we  appreciate the significant work you are doing to address the needs of your  education communities and to implement recovery efforts.

|  | Sincerely,  |
|--|-------------|
|  | /s/         |
|  | Betsy DeVos |

----

Attachments

Non-Regulatory Guidance on Flexibility and Waivers for Grantees and Program Participants Impacted by Federally Declared Disasters

Department of Education Contacts
  Last Modified: 09/20/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 480 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 480

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2018, as ``Silver Star 
                         Service Banner Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 2018

  Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mrs. McCaskill) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2018, as ``Silver Star 
                         Service Banner Day''.

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill 
        members of the Armed Forces;
Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the 
        Armed Forces and veterans who were wounded or became ill in combat in 
        the wars fought by the United States;
Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to help the people of the 
        United States remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill 
        members of the Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver Star 
        Service Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose;
Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of America is to evoke 
        memories of the sacrifices made by members of the Armed Forces and 
        veterans on behalf of the United States through the presence of a Silver 
        Star Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying;
Whereas the sacrifices made by members of the Armed Forces and veterans on 
        behalf of the United States should never be forgotten; and
Whereas May 1, 2018, is an appropriate date to designate as ``Silver Star 
        Service Banner Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of May 1, 2018, as ``Silver 
        Star Service Banner Day''; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        Silver Star Service Banner Day with appropriate programs, 
        ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Fred J. Kleisner



CERTIFICATION



I, Fred J. Kleisner, Chief Executive Officer of Wyndham International, Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K/A of Wyndham International, Inc.;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Fred J. Kleisner
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Name: Fred J. Kleisner Title: Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017413EN.01002601.xml

| 5.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/26

---

Corrigendum to Call for proposals — ‘Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy’ (CAP) for 2018

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 339 of 10 October 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 339 of 10 October 2017

(2017/C 413/12)

On page 8, Section 3, in the table, row b) ‘Deadline for submitting applications’, column ‘Date and time period’:

for:

for:

‘15 December 2017’,

read:

read:

‘5 January 2018’;

on page 9, Section 6, in point 6.1 ‘Eligible applicants’, subtitle ‘
  Affiliated entities
  ’:

Eligible applicants

Affiliated entities

for:

for:

‘(...) in section 11.2. (...)’,

read:

read:

‘(...) in section 11.1. (...)’;

on page 13, Section 7, in point 7.2 ‘Remedial measures’:

Remedial measures

for:

for:

‘(...) (see section 7.4), (...)’,

read:

read:

‘(...) (see section 7.1), (...)’.

---
28.101-1 Policy on use. ( a ) A contracting officer shall not require a bid guarantee unless a performance bond or a performance and payment bond is also required (see 28.102 and 28.103). Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this subsection, bid guarantees shall be required whenever a performance bond or a performance and payment bond is required.
( b ) All types of bid guarantees are acceptable for supply or service contracts (see annual bid bonds and annual performance bonds coverage in 28.001). Only separate bid guarantees are acceptable in connection with construction contracts. Agencies may specify that only separate bid bonds are acceptable in connection with construction contracts.
( c ) The chief of the contracting office may waive the requirement to obtain a bid guarantee when a performance bond or a performance and payment bond is required if it is determined that a bid guarantee is not in the best interest of the Government for a specific acquisition (e.g., overseas construction, emergency acquisitions, sole-source contracts). Class waivers may be authorized by the agency head or designee.
[48 FR 42286, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 2665, Jan. 17, 1986; 52 FR 19803, May 27, 1987; 52 FR 30076, Aug. 12, 1987; 54 FR 34755, Aug. 21, 1989; 61 FR 39213, July 26, 1996]
# e USDeparimeff l otTronsponaTto n PMtaralAt/iatio n Administratio n •;"PARTMEN T O F ^^NSPORWIO N ^ ./..E l OPERATION S ; [ J^N2 8 P 3;U 8 80 0 independenc e Ave, . S W . Washington , D.C . 2059 i JA N 2 6 201 1 Mr . Michae

l E . Walke r Mountain Ai

r Cargo , Inc . P.O . Bo x 48 8 Denver , N C 2803 7 Dea r Mr . Walker : W e have receive

dyou r Decembe r 8,2010 , correspondence withdrawin g you r Novembe r 8,2010 , petitio n onbehal f

of Mountai n Ai r Cargo , Inc . fo

r a n exemption from § 121.1109 o

f Titl e 14 , Cod

e o f Federa l Regulation s (CFR) . W e hav e closeddocke

t No . FAA-2010^113 3 an

dn o furthe r action will b e take

n o n you r petition . Sincerely , BrendaD . Courtne

y Manager , Aircraf

t an dAirpor t Rule s Division

3 0 3Dtf d 9Ni>iyw3"in y J O BOIJJ O SZ.0Si9S20 S 9E:9 I TI02/83/T 0
#### 2808.405-3 Blanket purchase agreements (BPAs).

The SPE is the agency head for purposes of FAR 8.405-3(a)(3)(ii).
#### In the Matter of Clarence A. Noyes et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Orangetown, Petitioners, v. Robert P. Slocum et al., Constituting the Board of Supervisors of Rockland County, Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, to review a determination of the respondent Rockland County Board of Supervisors, made December 26,1963 after public hearing, establishing the Rockland County Sewer District No. 1. By order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, made April 3, 1964 pursuant to statute (CPLR 7804, subd. [g]), the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs. In our opinion, no triable issues of fact have been raised in this proceeding. Upon the entire record we conclude that the determination of the respondent Board of Supervisors of Rockland County was supported by substantial evidence. Furthermore, we find that there has been a substantial compliance with the statutory requirements set forth in the relevant sections of the County Law. The contemplated sewer district should not be invalidated by technical deviations or variations from the letter of the statute or by minor irregularities which do not essentially affect the proceeding (ef. 63 C. J. S., Municipal Corporations, § 1379). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Ra'bin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-40729, and No. 333-36750) and the related prospectuses and in
the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-74601, No. 333-64989, No.
333-56677, No. 333-51903, No. 333-43595, No. 333-42375, No. 333-34743, No.
333-34699, No. 333-31265, No. 33-44115, No. 33-31819, No. 33-23504, No. 33-7499,
No. 2-89925, No. 33-10106, No. 33-38044, No. 33-16987, No. 33-62603, and
333-36218) of Compaq Computer Corporation of our reports dated January 23, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.



                                                           Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas
February 8, 2001
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130894 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130894 

 COA: 267608

 Oakland CC: 05-202532-FH 

JULIUS MICHAEL RITCHIE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk