alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 2, 2021)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 7787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02250]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 20 / Tuesday, February 2, 2021 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 7787]]

                Memorandum of January 13, 2021

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 614(a)(2) 
                of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of Title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of 
                State, subject to fulfilling the requirement of section 
                614(a)(3) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), 
                the authority under section 614(a)(2) of the FAA to 
                determine whether it is vital to the national security 
                interests of the United States to make up to $6.8 
                million in sales of cluster munitions technology under 
                the Arms Export Control Act to the Republic of Korea, 
                without regard to any other provision of law within the 
                purview of section 614(a)(2) of the FAA.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 13, 2021

[FR Doc. 2021-02250
2-1-21; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Chart 11416HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       11416          Edition:       10          Edition       Date: October       2008          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/22/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
#### Great American Insurance Company v. John R. Cochrane et al.

Motion to resettle the order of affirmance dated April 3, 1962, so as to contain a direction for entry of judgment denied, without costs, and without prejudice to an application at Special Term for the relief sought. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts
AbstractTitle             PageList of             FiguresConversion             FactorsAbstractIntroductionSettingMethodsBathymetrySidescan             Sonar Seismic             Profiles SedimentsBottom             Photography Data             CatalogSummaryAcknowledgmentsReferences             Cited Contacts
Gridded bathymetry and sidescan-sonar imagery together cover       approximately 37.3 square kilometers of sea floor in the vicinity of       Edgartown Harbor, Massachusetts. Although originally collected for       charting purposes during National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration       hydrographic survey H11346, these acoustic data, and the sea-floor       stations and seismic-reflection lines subsequently occupied to verify       them, 1) show the composition and terrain of the seabed, 2) provide       information on sediment transport and benthic habitat, and 3) are part of       an expanding series of studies that provide a fundamental framework for       research and management (for example, windfarms, pipelines, and dredging)       activities along the Massachusetts inner continental shelf.   

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/abstract.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:32:06 EDT
Exhibit 10(b) 










	  	
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP 

      214 North Tryon Street 

      Suite 3600 

      Charlotte, NC 28202 

      Telephone (704) 344 7500 

      Facsimile
(704) 344 4100 

      www.pwc.com 






 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 We hereby consent to the inclusion within Exhibit 23-11 in this Amendment No. 28 to the BlackRock Basic Value Principal Protected Fund of BlackRock Principal Protected Trust's Registration Statement on Form N-1A, of our report dated March 26, 2009, relating to the financial statements of Main Place Funding, LLC, which appears in Main Place Funding, LLC's Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

 Charlotte, North Carolina

October 26, 2009
#### 252.216-7009 Allowability of Legal Costs Incurred in Connection with a Whistleblower Proceeding.

As prescribed in 216.307(a), use the following clause:

# Allowability of Legal Costs Incurred in Connection With a Whistleblower Proceeding (DEC 2022)

Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 3750, notwithstanding FAR clause 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment—

(a) The restrictions of FAR 31.205-47(b) on allowability of costs related to legal and other proceedings also apply to any proceeding brought by a contractor employee submitting a complaint under 10 U.S.C. 4701, entitled “Contractor employees: protection from reprisal for disclosure of certain information;” and

(b) Costs incurred in connection with a proceeding that is brought by a contractor employee submitting a complaint under 10 U.S.C. 4701 are also unallowable if the result is an order to take corrective action under 10 U.S.C. 4701.

(End of clause)

[78 FR 59861, Sept. 30, 2013, as amended at 87 FR 76997, Dec. 16, 2022]
#### 236.602-70 Restriction on award of overseas architect-engineer contracts to foreign firms.

In accordance with section 111 of the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015 (Division I of Pub. L. 113-235) and the same provision in subsequent military construction appropriations acts, architect-engineer contracts funded by military construction appropriations that are estimated to exceed $500,000 and are to be performed in Japan, in any North Atlantic Treaty Organization member country, or in countries bordering the Arabian Gulf (*i.e.,* Iran, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Iraq), shall be awarded only to United States firms or to joint ventures of United States and host nation firms.

[80 FR 15911, Mar. 26, 2015]
#### Nuri Taub, Appellant, v Art Students League of New York et al., Respondents.

[834 NYS2d 108]

*260Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered February 8, 2006, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered July 12, 2006, which denied plaintiffs motion for reargument, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

There is no evidence probative of what caused plaintiff to trip and fall on the premises of defendant Art Students League. Plaintiff merely surmised, after seeing metal “sticking out” in the hallway two weeks after the accident, that the protruding metal had caused her fall. She never testified that an uneven transition in the floor precipitated her fall, the theory she now relies upon, and accordingly advances no nonspeculative ground for such causation *(see Kane v Estia Greek Rest.,*4 AD3d 189 [2004]). To the extent plaintiff attributes her fall to the uneven surface of the floor in the hallway, based on “circumstantial evidence,” her arguments are unavailing *(compare Schneider v Kings Highway Hosp. Ctr.,*67 NY2d 743 [1986]). We reject plaintiffs effort to characterize the motion dated March 8, 2006 as one for renewal after it was sub judice. Concur—Saxe, J.P, Friedman, Sweeny, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cv-04507 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:22
Case: 1:12-cv-04507 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:23
Case: 1:12-cv-04507 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:24
Case: 1:12-cv-04507 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:25
Case: 1:12-cv-04507 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:26
');
	document.write('

March 22, 2011

Dear Governors:

Even  during this period of profound resource challenges, governors armed with facts  about what works in promoting college completion can do much to encourage our  public and private systems of higher education to make cost-effective reforms  that will help many, many more students succeed.  I am writing to offer the U.S. Department of  Education’s assistance and my personal commitment to help you and your Cabinet  in developing and highlighting no-cost and low-cost policies that can increase college  completion rates and in turn help better secure the economic future of your  state.

President  Obama has set a goal that by 2020 the United States of America will once again  have the best educated workforce in the world. This is not and should not be viewed as a partisan goal.  It is a goal that all Americans can rally  around.  I encourage you to work  collaboratively with higher education leaders in your state, faculty,  philanthropic foundations, and the many others who are increasingly interested  in promoting heightened levels of college success even at a time of  extraordinary resource challenges.

The  U.S. Department of Education has prepared the enclosed *College Completion Tool Kit* to give you and your advisors a head  start on organizing your state’s college completion strategies and policies.  Please feel free to distribute this guide,  which is also available in an electronic form, as widely as possible.  Later this year, our Department will further  highlight this issue by posting each state’s college completion goals and  strategies on our Web site.



| | Sincerely, 
| | -----------
| | /s/        
| | Arne Duncan

Enclosures

---

Enclosures

College Completion Tool Kitdownload filesPDF 1.79MB

College Completion Tool Kit Insertdownload filesPDF 3.16MB
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To
Media 100 Inc.:

As
independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report, dated January 7, 2002 (except with respect to the matter discussed in Note 7(b)(v),
as to which the date is February 25, 2002) included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 File nos.
33-00346, 33-06609, 33-50692, 33-59937, 333-24139, 333-52139, 333-52990, 333-65338,
333-65336 and 333-65798.



Boston,
Massachusetts
February 25, 2002

---

QuickLinks
# C_2016475EN.01000101.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 475/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 462, 12.12.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 454, 5.12.2016

OJ C 441, 28.11.2016

OJ C 428, 21.11.2016

OJ C 419, 14.11.2016

OJ C 410, 7.11.2016

OJ C 402, 31.10.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
');
	document.write('

The Education Amendments Act of 1972 authorized the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare to improve postsecondary educational opportunities by providing assistance to educational institutions and agencies for a broad range of reforms and innovations. The specific authority is now contained in Title VII of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

The Higher Education Opportunity Act (Public Law 110-315) (HEOA) was enacted on August 14, 2008. This law reauthorizes and extends the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.  The Higher Education Act (HEA) provides the statutory authority for most of the programs administered by OPE, as well as for the Federal Student Aid Programs.

## Legislation

- Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, Title VII, Part B; U.S.C. 1138-1138d

## Regulations

- There are no program-specific regulations.
- Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), 34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99

FIPSE Home
**EXHIBIT 23**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
     We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-73468) of International Lease Finance Corporation(the “Company”) and in the related Prospectus of ourreport dated February 15, 2002, relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule, which appear in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Wealso consent to the reference to us under the heading“Experts” in such Registration Statement.
                                                PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP
Los Angeles, CaliforniaMarch 22, 2002
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Adam Casarez, * From the 106 th District

Court of Dawson County,

Trial Court No. 12

- 7210

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00092

- CR * September 17, 2015

T he State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
#### 225.7021 Disclosure requirements for employment transparency regarding individuals who perform work in the People's Republic of China.

See PGI 225.7021 for additional procedures regarding disclosures.

[87 FR 52342, Aug. 25, 2022]
#### 1819.7214 [Reserved]
2814.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award. ( a ) The authority to make determinations under paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of FAR 14.407-3 is delegated to the HCA, or designee at a level at or above the chief of the contracting office. The HCA or designee shall seek the advice of legal counsel before making any determinations.
( b ) The following procedures shall be followed when submitting cases of mistakes in bids to the Comptroller General for an advance decision. ( 1 ) Requests for advance decisions submitted to the Comptroller General in cases of mistakes in bids shall be made by the HCA, or designee.
( 2 ) Requests for advance decisions shall be in writing, dated, signed by the requestor, addressed to the Comptroller General of the United States, General Accounting Office, Washington, DC 20548, and contain the following: ( i ) The name and address of the party requesting the decision;
( ii ) A statement of the question to be decided, a presentation of all relevant facts, and a statement of the requesting party's position with respect to the question; and,
( iii ) Copies of all pertinent records and supporting documentation.
4250 4250

4300

4250

4400

4300

4250

4300

4350

4250

4300

4350

4300

4300

4350

4350

4300

4300

4350

87

87

102 102

102

L A M B E R G E R L N

T E L E P H O N E R D

F M 3 110 F M 3 110

B A R T H R D

B E Z N E R L N

F M 3 110

R A N C H R D 1 8 7 9

G A N D Y R D

F M 3 110

87

87

102 102

102

L A M B E R G E R L N

T E L E P H O N E R D

F M 3 110 F M 3 110

B A R T H R D

B E Z N E R L N

F M 3 110

R A N C H R D 1 8 7 9

G A N D Y R D

F M 3 110

Carrizo Creek

Carrizo Creek

Bunker Hill

Wharton

Ranch

Windy

Hill

Tovrea

Ranch

Wharton

Ranch

Windy

Hill NW

Canyon

School

Bolin

Corlena Perico

Wells

Ranch

102°45'

12'30" 12'30"

10' 10'

102° 50' 45'

15'

50'

36°

30"

102°

36°

15'

30"

52'

36°

07'

47'

30" 47'30"

4 100 000

280 000 FEET

4 060 000

6

6

6

40

40

40

6 7

40

6

40

40

40

40

40

40

6

40

6

6

40

7

40

40

6

40

6

6

40

7

40

40

40

40

6

6

40

40

000m

40

7

40

40

40

000m

6

40

000m 6

08

97

02

94 96

96

07

05

13

98

00

N

93

12

07

92

92

09

09

98 99 00 01

05

11

01

10

01

03

97

04

08

12

06

03

04

99

N

02

11

93

10

13

06

00

95

94

01

E

FEET

FEET

260 000 FEET

FA GA

36°07'30"

102°52'30"

FV

FA

FA GA E 7

02000m

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 36102-224

WHARTON RANCH, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WHARTON RANCH QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 13S

Imagery...................................................NAIP, August 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2005

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2002

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 17 ́

23 MILS

7° 39 ́

136 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13S

FA

FV

GA

40 00

7 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
#### 253.215 Contracting by negotiation.
Page 1 of 1

mhtml:file://C:\Documents and Settings\BBicknell\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\46 FR... 10/4/2011
# C_2017179EN.01000102.xml

| 7.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8471 — BC Partners/PSC/Shawbrook)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 179/02)

On 1 June 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8471. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8471. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# CA2017064EN.01000101.xml

| 28.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 64/1

---

SELECTION PROCEDURE PE/195/S

Temporary staff member — Head of Unit (AD 14)

LIST OF SUITABLE CANDIDATES

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

The list of suitable candidates was adopted on 14 February 2017.

---
Honorable Howard P. "Buck" McKeon
          House of Representatives
          Washington, DC 20515

Dear Representative McKeon:

Thank you for your June 3, 2002, letter regarding the Department's            determination of financial responsibility for postsecondary institutions            participating in the Federal student aid programs authorized by Title            IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

We take seriously our obligation to ensure that each postsecondary            institution participating in the Federal student aid programs provides            the services to students that it describes in its official publications            and statements, allocates the necessary administrative resources to            ensure proper administration of the student aid programs, and satisfies            all of its financial obligations.

In determining an institution's financial responsibility, the Department            calculates a primary reserve ratio. This ratio is a measure of an institution's            expendable resources and is one indicator of its overall financial health.            We are aware that some institutions believe that the current guidance            does not properly account for long-term debts that might not be associated            with prior expenditures on plant, property and equipment. Consequently,            we are reviewing the policy guidance contained in Dear Colleague Letter            GEN-01-02 with respect to calculating the primary reserve ratio.

The Department's ongoing management improvement effort is focused on            adopting and enhancing management controls that will help us effectively            monitor our programs. We are also reviewing our policies--and making            changes as necessary--to ensure that all of our programs achieve their            intended results while protecting the taxpayers' interests. We will            hold our program participants and other grantees accountable for results;            we will not tolerate waste, fraud and abuse in any of our programs.

Thank you for your interest in this topic. I will inform you of the            results of our review.

Sincerely,

/s/

Rod Paige

|Last Modified: 09/15/2004
|-------------------------