alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of Education - Office of Postsecondary Education 

American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Program 

Keweenaw Bay Ojibwa Community College

L’Anse, Michigan

Project Abstract

The Keweenaw Bay Ojibwa Community College (KBOCC), located in L’Anse, Michigan, is a 

rural two-year college chartered by the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community in 1975. The 

College’s mission is to provide postsecondary education rich in Ojibwa culture, tradition and 

beliefs that support life-long learning. The Keweenaw Bay Ojibwa Community College is 

seeking funding to strengthen institutional systems to increase the College’s capacity through the 

following main objectives: 

1) strengthen funds management through enhanced capacity in the Office of Sponsored 

Programs;

2) enhance assessment of student learning and institution effectiveness;

3) increase and enhance student services programs; and

4) to build capacity for faculty, staff, and Board of Regents through professional 

development trainings.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of International Lease Finance Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting
Date:April 5, 2005                                        /s/ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy   STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 14, 2024

To: U.S. Department of Education

From: Scott Dolan, Alternate Negotiator, Private-Nonprofit Institutions of Higher Education

Re: Issue Paper 2—State Authorization (Data Request)

In the January sessions, the Department raised concerns that reciprocity agreements, “...have 

shortcomings that fail to protect students and taxpayers and that reduce States’ oversight of institutions. 

Additionally, we are concerned that some States are deferring all, or nearly all, of their oversight 

responsibilities to other States and the governing bodies that oversee these agreements for approval of 

educational institutions. The Department’s concerns are primarily related to two areas: complaints and 

governance.

In the February sessions, the Department added the language “education-specific” to § 600.9 State 

authorization, based on a proposal submitted by Carolyn Fast, representing Civil Rights Organizations and 

Consumer Advocates. The Department also asked negotiators to provide feedback on what defines an 

education-specific law? Despite a long discussion at the table, a clear definition of “education-specific” 

failed to emerge. And the Department provided no perspective on its own interpretations of “educationspecific” making it difficult to negotiate. At the table, the below questions were asked. FMCS team 

members asked that the questions be submitted via chat or formal proposal. This is a formal data request 

for the questions raised during the session.

Data Request

We are asking for the Department to provide additional data, research and/or clarification regarding the 

following:

1. Please define what is meant by an education-specific law?

2. In introducing the conversation about education-specific laws, what issues or problems is the 

department trying to address?

3. How are these issues and concerns different than the Department’s original concerns, which 

focused on “complaints and governance”?

4. For the issues/problems identified by the Department, what evidence or data can the 

department provide about the scale and scope of the issues?

5. How will the introduction of education-specific language help to resolve these issues and in what 

ways? What is the department’s ultimate rationale for how this will fix the most pressing issues?

6. Given the concerns raised by other constituencies about enforcement across state lines, will the 

new regulations actually work to the desired end?

7. Would the Department’s proposed language disallow SARA’s current policy that prevents states 

from enforcing education-specific authorization requirements on out-of-state institutions?

8. Where, specifically, in the Higher Education Act does the department derive regulatory authority 

over state authorization?
III 

Calendar No. 400 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 355 

Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations in the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. PERDUE) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules and Administration 

MAY 8, 2018 

Reported by Mr. BLUNT, with amendments 

[Omit the part struck through] 

RESOLUTION 

Improving procedures for the consideration of nominations 

in the Senate. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF NOMINATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

4 (1) POST-CLOTURE CONSIDERATION.—If cloture 

5 is invoked in accordance with rule XXII of the 

6 Standing Rules of the Senate on a nomination de7 scribed in paragraph (2), there shall be no more 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 355 RS 

1 than 8 hours of post-cloture consideration equally di2 vided in the usual form. 

3 (2) NOMINATIONS COVERED.—A nomination 

4 described in this paragraph is any nomination except 

5 for the nomination of an individual— 

6 (A) to a position at level I of the Executive 

7 Schedule under section 5312 of title 5, United 

8 States Code; or 

9 (B) to serve as a judge or justice ap10 pointed to hold office during good behavior. 

11 (b) SPECIAL RULE FOR DISTRICT COURT NOMI12 NEES.—If cloture is invoked in accordance with rule XXII 

13 of the Standing Rules of the Senate on a nomination of 

14 an individual to serve as a judge of a district court of the 

15 United States, there shall be no more than 2 hours of 

16 post-cloture consideration equally divided in the usual 

17 form. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 400 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 355 

RESOLUTION 

Improving procedures for the consideration of 

nominations in the Senate. 

MAY 8, 2018 

Reported with amendments 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### 208.7102 Procedures.

Follow the procedures at PGI 208.7102 when contracting or performing services for NASA.

[71 FR 39005, July 11, 2006]
#### WOHLGEMUTH, Appellant, v. HARLEM RIVER PARK AMUSEMENT CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Albert Wohlgemuth, as administrator, against the Harlem River Park Amusement Company.

J. W. Russell, for appellant.

W. V. Goldberg, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
# C_2018429EN.01000201.xml

| 28.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

27 November 2018

(2018/C 429/02)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1328 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4617 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88748 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2823 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1309 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 141,00 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7325 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,914 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 324,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2902 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6583 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 5,9313 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5631 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5018 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8679 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6647 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5582 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 279,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,6320 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8708 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4275 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 410,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7498 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,439 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,6401 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,371 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4011 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,1784 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,1620 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1328

JPY

Japanese yen

128,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4617

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88748

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2823

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1309

ISK

Iceland króna

141,00

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7325

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,914

HUF

Hungarian forint

324,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2902

RON

Romanian leu

4,6583

TRY

Turkish lira

5,9313

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5631

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5018

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8679

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6647

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5582

KRW

South Korean won

1 279,17

ZAR

South African rand

15,6320

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8708

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4275

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 410,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7498

PHP

Philippine peso

59,439

RUB

Russian rouble

75,6401

THB

Thai baht

37,371

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4011

MXN

Mexican peso

23,1784

INR

Indian rupee

80,1620

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Legislation

                - Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-123

## Regulations

                - Education Department General Administrative Regulations  (EDGAR), Parts  75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 97, 98, and 99

Institutional Service Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 2803.908-71 Whistleblower Protection in Intelligence-Related Non-Disclosure Agreement.

The contracting officer shall ensure that any Intelligence-Related NDA that DOJ requires a Covered Individual to sign contains the required Whistleblower Protection Provision at JAR 2852.203-71.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Flava Works, Inc., )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:12-cv-05844

)

) 

)

)

John Doe #1 to #26, et. al. )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF FILING

Please take notice that on or before October 11, 2012, Plaintiff, Flava Works, Inc., has 

filed the following documents or items:

1. Subpoena to Yahoo! Inc.

The documents or items have been or are being electronically served on all counsel of 

record for all parties.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Meanith Huon

Meanith Huon

PO Box 441

Chicago, Illinois 60690

Phone: (312) 405-2789

E-mail: huon.meanith@gmail.com

IL ARDC. No.: 6230996

Case: 1:12-cv-05844 Document #: 12 Filed: 10/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:685
# C_2017197EN.01000201.xml

| 21.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 June 2017

(2017/C 197/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1156 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4378 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88143 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7575 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0854 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4930 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,293 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2306 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5988 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9450 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4674 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4812 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7015 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5414 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5482 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 271,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6166 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6159 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4175 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 830,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7850 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,902 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 66,2746 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,919 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6845 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,2098 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,9705 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1156

JPY

Japanese yen

124,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4378

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88143

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7575

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0854

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4930

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,293

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2306

RON

Romanian leu

4,5988

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9450

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4674

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4812

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7015

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5414

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5482

KRW

South Korean won

1 271,75

ZAR

South African rand

14,6166

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6159

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4175

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 830,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7850

PHP

Philippine peso

55,902

RUB

Russian rouble

66,2746

THB

Thai baht

37,919

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6845

MXN

Mexican peso

20,2098

INR

Indian rupee

71,9705

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Who May Apply (by category):** Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs)

**Who May Apply (specifically):** Institutions of higher education that offer a postbaccalaureate certificate or degree program and qualify as eligible Hispanic-serving institutions.

There is an application process to determine eligibility.   Please refer to the most recent Application for Designation as an Eligible Institution.  You may contact the program office if you have questions regarding eligibility.

Refer to the Tips and Assistance section on the Eligibility page to find more information, the latest webinar schedule, and/or presentations regarding eligibility.

**Lists of Eligible Institutions by Fiscal Year**



Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 01/15/2014
|-------------------------
|   | EXHIBIT 31.2 |
|--------|--------------|

|   | 3. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Valley National Bancorp; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 1, 2015                   |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                |
|                                |
|                                |
| /s/ Alan D. Eskow                   |
| Alan D. Eskow                       |
| Senior Executive Vice President and |
| Chief Financial Officer             |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Rega, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on June 2, 1978, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Lane, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
exv10wvv






Exhibit 10(vv)




SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          This Second Amendment To Employment Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) is made and entered
into as of this 31st day of August, 2009 by and between A. SCHULMAN, INC., a Delaware
Corporation (the “Company”), A. SCHULMAN INC. LIMITED, a corporation organized under the laws of
the United Kingdom and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Employer”), and JACK B.
TAYLOR (the “Employee”).




          WHEREAS, in recognition of certain business requirements of the Employer and the intended
retirement plans of the Employee, the parties desire to make certain amendments to the Employment
Agreement dated the 28th of May, 2003 (the “Agreement”) and the Amendment to Employment
Agreement dated the 31st day of August, 2008 (the “First Amendment”);




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained,
the parties hereto agree as follows:





	 	A.	 	This Second Amendment makes certain amendments to the Agreement and the First
Amendment and otherwise leaves the Agreement and the First Amendment unchanged and in
full force and effect.
	 
	 	B.	 	Employee’s base salary shall be 200,000 EU with 50% bonus potential. The
base salary shall be subject to normal annual revision. The bonus shall be paid on
achieving specific income and cash flow targets for the Company’s Asia region adjusted
by accomplishment of personal goals. The bonus shall be administered on the same basis
as bonus arrangements for other executives of the Company at the same level of
responsibility.
	 
	 	C.	 	There will be the following equity compensation as part of Employee’s entire
compensation package. Employee shall receive 5,000 shares of restricted stock (as
distinguished from restricted stock units) at the end of year one and an additional
5,000 shares at the end of the second year, provided Employee works under this Second
Amendment through to each respective date.
	 
	 	D.	 	The Term of the Agreement is extended to and shall end on December 31, 2011,
provided that either party has the right to terminate this Second Amendment and the
Agreement as of the end of the first year upon 60 days prior notice. This extension
of term is made and the end date is fixed without the need of any month to month
extensions, without reference to Employee’s birthday, and without the need for any
further notice to make it effective.




- 1 -









 











          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed (the
corporate signatory by the respective officer duly authorized) as of the day and year first above
written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	EMPLOYEE:	 	 	 	EMPLOYER:


A. SCHULMAN INC. LIMITED	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Jack B. Taylor
 

JACK B. TAYLOR

	 	 
	 	BY:
	 	/s/ Joseph M. Gingo
 

JOSEPH M. GINGO, CEO & PRESIDENT
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	COMPANY:


A. SCHULMAN INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	BY:
	 	/s/ Joseph M. Gingo
 

JOSEPH M. GINGO, CEO & PRESIDENT
	 	 







- 2 -
#### 2822.604 Exemptions.
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:213
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 2 of 20 PageID #:214
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 3 of 20 PageID #:215
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 4 of 20 PageID #:216
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 5 of 20 PageID #:217
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 6 of 20 PageID #:218
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 7 of 20 PageID #:219
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 8 of 20 PageID #:220
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 9 of 20 PageID #:221
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 10 of 20 PageID #:222
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 11 of 20 PageID #:223
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 12 of 20 PageID #:224
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 13 of 20 PageID #:225
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 14 of 20 PageID #:226
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 15 of 20 PageID #:227
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 16 of 20 PageID #:228
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 17 of 20 PageID #:229
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 18 of 20 PageID #:230
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 19 of 20 PageID #:231
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/09/12 Page 20 of 20 PageID #:232