alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      175
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,526
<PP&E>                                          57,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              823
<BONDS>                                         34,601
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,974
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,069
<SALES>                                          9,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,010
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    871
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                871
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       871
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51


</TABLE>
COMMERCIAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA MEETING

March.28, 1995

AGENDA

10:00 a.m . Opening Remarks /Introductions (Anthony Balducci)

Purpose of Meeting

Background

Date for Submitting Data - April

Discussion of Evaluation Criteria

12:00 noon ...... Lunch

Program Organization

Coverage

Testing and Rating

Information Program

Manufacturer Participation

Publicity

Market Data

Continuation of Program

1:00 p.m. Reconvene

EE-DET-94-002 COMMENT 0C
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 235 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 235

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of Defense should 
 consider establishing an award program for the cyber community of the 
                         Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2017

 Mr. Rounds submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of Defense should 
 consider establishing an award program for the cyber community of the 
                         Department of Defense.

Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Secretary of Defense should consider--
            (1) establishing an award program for employees of the 
        Department of Defense who carry out the cyber missions or 
        functions of the Department of Defense;
            (2) all award options under law or policy, including 
        compensation, time off, and status awards;
            (3) awards based upon operational impact and meritorious 
        service;
            (4) providing the largest possible opportunity for such 
        members or employees to earn such rewards without regard to 
        type of position, grade, years of service, experience or past 
        performance;
            (5) individual and organization rewards; and
            (6) other factors, as the Secretary considers appropriate, 
        that would reward and provide incentive to cyber personnel or 
        organizations.
                                 <all>
```
#### Anna Mosher et al., Respondents, v. Albert D. Mitchell, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury and loss of services, in which the defendant interposed, as a defense, that plaintiffs’ claims had been duly released in writing, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme iCourt, Dutchess County, entered April 3, 1962, which denied his motion for a separate and prior trial on the issue of general release raised by his defense. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements *(Fonville*V. *Irving Poultry Go.,*243 App. Div. 528; *Romania*v. *Lamport & Holt,*207 App. Div. 861). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Flood of September 2008 in Northwestern Indiana (http://pubs.usgs.gov/ofr/2010/1098/) Appendix 2

Approximate flood-peak extents and depths, flood of September 2008, for Little Calumet River near Highland, 

Indiana. During times of high water, flow direction changes. This part of the Little Calumet River flows from 

west to east. Aerial photograph courtesy of Indiana University, Indiana Spatial Data Portal, 2008 National Agriculture Imagery Program, accessed June 2, 2009, at http://www.indiana.edu/~gisdata/statewide/08naip.html.

I 80 E

I 90 E

I 80 W

I 90 W

I 65 S

I 65 N

US HWY 41

US HWY 20

STATE HWY 73

STATE HWY 53

US HWY 12

STATE HWY 55

STATE HWY 152

STATE HWY 912

E

X

P

L

A

N

ATIO

N

Limit of studyDirection of flowMajor road

Flo

o

d

D

e

pth

28.8 feet (deep)0.1 foot (shallow) 0 1 2 Miles

Approximate flood-peak extents and depths, flood of September 2008, for Little Calumet River near Highland, Indiana.

During times of high water, flow direction changes. This part of the Little Calumet River flows from west to east. Aerial

photograph courtesy of Indiana University, Indiana Spatial Data Portal, 2008 National Agriculture Imagery Program,

accessed June 2, 2009, at http://www.indiana.edu/~gisdata/statewide/08naip.html
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 19 (Monday, February 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee: VA National Academic Affiliations Council, 
Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the VA National 
Academic Affiliations Council (Council) will meet via conference call 
on March 9, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EST. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Council is to advise the Secretary on matters 
affecting partnerships between VA and its academic affiliates.
    On March 9, 2021, the Council will receive annual training from the 
Advisory Committee Management Office; brief on VA modernization impact 
on trainee onboarding; status of VA's Electronic Health Record 
implementation; and update from the Strategic Academic Advisory Council 
(SAAC). The Council will receive public comments from 2:45 p.m. to 2:55 
p.m. EST.
    Interested persons may attend and/or present oral statements to the 
Council. The dial in number to attend the conference call is: 646-828-
7666. At the prompt, enter meeting ID 161 601 0099, then press #. The 
meeting passcode is 590228, then press #. Individuals seeking to 
present oral statements are invited to submit a 1-2 page summary of 
their comments at the time of the meeting for inclusion in the official 
meeting record. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or 
less, depending on the number of participants. Interested parties may 
also provide written comments for review by the Council prior to the 
meeting or at any time, by email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5814392a312b2b39761d35372a21182e39763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0ac819289939381cea58d8f9299a09681ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail to 
Larissa A. Emory PMP, CBP, MS, Designated Federal Officer, Office of 
Academic Affiliations (14AA), 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20420. Any member of the public wishing to participate or seeking 
additional information should contact Ms. Emory via email or by phone 
at (915) 269-0465.

    Dated: January 27, 2021.
Jelessa M. Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-02041 Filed 1-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties V Limited Partnership 1997 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000712753
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          75,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         31,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,906
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,587
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.42<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### David Scott, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Frank C. Scott, Jr., et al., Respondents, *v.*North Shore Hospital et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants North Shore Hospital, Bloome and Hill appeal from two orders of the *Supreme*Court, Nassau County, respectively entered July 23, 1964, and September 11, 1964, which *inter alia:*granted leave to the plaintiffs to serve a supplemental bill of particulars; limited the said defendants’ physical examination of the infant plaintiff by directing that the infant shall be examined on behalf of all of them by two physicians, one a qualified neuro-psychiatrist and one a qualified opthalmologist; and required that a copy of the examining physicians’ reports be furnished to the plaintiffs. Orders, insofar as appealed from by the three respective defendants, affirmed, with one bill of costs payable jointly by said three defendants. Trial of this action should not proceed until 30 days after the examining physicians shall have rendered their reports. Defendants shall furnish to plaintiffs a copy of such reports within five days after the reports are rendered. No opinion. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Webinar Attendees: The Commercial Prerinse Spray Valve Framework Meeting Meeting Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Bender, Sadie N/A N/A 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354N/A N/A Doug, Elliott N/A Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 620 SW 5th Ave., Suite 810 Portland OR 97204N/A N/A Faasse, Gene N/A T&S Brass and Bronze Works, Inc. 2 Saddleback Cove Travelers Rest SC 29690864-834-6737 N/A Frunk, Don Quality Coordinator Fisher Manufacturing Co. 1900 "O" Street Tulare CA 93274800-421-6162 N/A Himmelblau, Larry Product Compliance,

Engineering The Chicago Faucet Company 2100 S. Clearwater Drive Des Plaines IL 60018847-803-5000 x 235 847-803-5454 Hostick, Donna N/A Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Boulevard Richland WA 99352509-372-4323 N/A Hussain, Najiba N/A N/A najiba.hussain@navigant.com 1200 19th St NW Washington DC 20036 N/A N/A Johnson, Erica N/A Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354N/A N/A Lacovelli, Vincent N/A Kason Industries 57 Amaljack Blbd Newnan GA 30265 N/A N/A Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy

Coordinator Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP) 529 14th Street NW, Suite 600 Washington DC 20045202-507-4034 N/A Stoughton, Kate McMordie Engineer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Boulevard, PO Box 999, MSIN K5-20 Richland WA 99352720-379-3511 N/A Van Eeghen, Mark N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street NW Washington DC 20009202-973-4526 N/A
#### 216.603-3 Limitations.

See subpart 217.74 for additional limitations on the use of letter contracts.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Edwin Antonio Osorio

- Lopez, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00197

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17914 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Edwin Antonio Osorio

- Lopez, has adequately indicated his

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 2 7 , 2020
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 01-20975 01-20976 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN WESLEY MANNING, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-201-1

-------------------- May 10, 2002 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * In this consolidated appeal, John Wesley Manning (Manning) appeals two judgments by the district court revoking his supervised release. He argues that the district court erred in revoking his supervised release based upon a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 930(a), which prohibits the knowing possession of a dangerous weapon in a federal facility. He argues that, even if the revocation of his supervised release was proper, the cases should be remanded so the district court can resentence himNo. 01-20975 c/w 01-20976 -2- without taking into consideration the alleged violation under 18 U.S.C. § 930(a). The revocation of supervised release was proper as Manning pleaded true to two other violations of his supervised release.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3583; United States Sentencing Guidelines §§ 7B1.1, p.s., 7B1.3(a)(2), p.s. The 14-month sentences imposed for each of the supervised release terms revoked were not in violation of the law or plainly unreasonable. United States v. Moody , 277 F.3d 719, 720 (5th Cir. 2001); United States Sentencing Guidelines § 7B1.4(a), p.s. Moreover, a district court’s imposition of consecutive sentences upon the revocation of separate terms of supervised release is permissible. United States v. Gonzalez , 250 F.3d 923, 929 (5th Cir. 2001). Although the transcript of the revocation hearing indicates the district court made no finding that Manning violated 18 U.S.C. § 930(a), the written judgment reflects that the district court made such a finding. The case is therefore remanded so the district court can conform the written judgment to its oral pronouncement. See United States v. Martinez , 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2001). We AFFIRM the district court’s revocation of supervised release and the ensuing sentence, but we REMAND for the district court to conform the written judgment to its oral pronouncement.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 275 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 275

Congratulating Northeastern Illinois University on the sesquicentennial 
                           of the University.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2017

  Ms. Duckworth (for herself and Mr. Durbin) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating Northeastern Illinois University on the sesquicentennial 
                           of the University.

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University has served the Chicagoland area and 
        beyond for 150 years, having graduated nearly 80,000 students who have--

    (1) strengthened the local workforce;

    (2) made a positive difference in their communities; and

    (3) transformed the lives of others, just as the University has done 
for those students;

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University is regarded as the most diverse 
        regional university in the Midwest and is designated by the Department 
        of Education as a Hispanic-Serving Institution;
Whereas Northeastern Illinois University is known for--

    (1) having the safest campus in the State of Illinois;

    (2) being among the best institutions in the United States for adult 
learners; and

    (3) the fact that graduates of the University have the ninth-lowest 
amount of student loan debt among graduates of 4-year colleges and 
universities in the United States; and

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University offers more than 80 undergraduate and 
        graduate programs in the arts, sciences, education, and business at 5 
        locations in the Chicago metropolitan area, including in the North Park 
        and Bronzeville neighborhoods: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates Northeastern Illinois University on the 
        sesquicentennial of the University; and
            (2) extends best wishes to Northeastern Illinois University 
        for continued success and achievement.
                                 <all>
```
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased 

Equipment Costs: Clarifiers 

 

The following email supports EPA’s development of purchased equipment cost equations for 

clarifiers by documenting EPA's communication with a vendor regarding purchase costs for 

solids contact clarifiers used in the Steam Electric cost model. 
From: "Bill Sute" <bsute@walker-process.com> 

To: <Kavya.Kasturi@erg.com> 

CC: "'Jeff Thomas'" <jthomas@walker-process.com>, <gweverhart@comcast.net> 

Date: 7/6/2011 11:35 AM 

Subject: Cost request for solids contact clarifiers 

Attachments: 3321_001.pdf; 3322_001.pdf 

Kavya: 

 

Jeff Thomas requested that I respond to your June 30, 2011 email to Greg 

Everhart. 

 

First of all, I did a quick online search and found the following link 

which was quite informative: 

 

http://www.powermag.com/water/Flue-Gas-Desulfurization-Wastewater-Treatm 

ent-Primer_1739.html. 

 

With reference to the Secondary Clarification paragraph, I assumed an 

overflow rate of 0.25 gpm/ft2 for sizing the solids contact clarifiers 

below to be on the safe side. 

 

For the 30 gpm flow rate, use a general budgetary cost estimate of 

$65,000. The height and diameter of the associated tank are 12'-6" and 

15'-0", respectively. The weight of the clarifier is approximately 

10,000 lbs. 

 

For the 75 gpm flow rate, use a general budgetary cost estimate of 

$80,000. The height and diameter of the associated tank are 13'-6" and 

20'-0", respectively. The weight of the clarifier is approximately 

13,000 lbs. 

 

The solids contact clarifiers for the above flow rates are typically 

illustrated in the attachments. 

 

The above cost estimates do not include the cost of the clarifier tank 

and ancillary equipment. The clarifier is made of carbon steel and comes 

with Walker's standard primer coating. 

 

Finally, Walker's solids contact clarifiers typically do not require 

flash mix tanks and/or flocculation tanks prior to wastewater entering 

the clarifier. However, as Walker is not all that familiar with the 

chemistry involved upstream of the secondary clarifier as indicated in 

the above link, Walker suggests that jar and/or pilot scale tests be 

conducted on a case-by-case basis to verify that the tanks are not 

required. 

 

Please let me know if you have questions on any of this. 

 

 

Thank you. 

 

 

Bill