alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains Summary Financial Information extracted from the
Quarterly Report for the three months ended March 31, 2000 of Carrols
Corporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statement.
</LEGEND>

<CAPTION>
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                         2,050,000
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  1,453,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     (68,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                    3,951,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              18,196,000
<PP&E>                                                       219,724,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (94,348,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               321,216,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         35,660,000
<BONDS>                                                      243,806,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    14,538,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 321,216,000
<SALES>                                                      109,523,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             109,751,000
<CGS>                                                         31,412,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 93,312,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             5,840,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (933,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    (420,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (513,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (513,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0


</TABLE>
## FY 2023

Appropriation: $16,370,000

## FY 2022

Appropriation: $14,539,000

## FY 2021

Appropriation: $13,394,000

## FY 2020

Appropriation: $12,635,000

## FY 2019

Appropriation: $11,135,000

## FY 2018

Appropriation:  $11,025,000

## FY 2017

Appropriation:  $9,466,000

## FY 2016

Appropriation: $9,648,000

## FY 2015

Appropriation: $8,971,000

## FY 2014

Appropriation: $8,971,000

## FY 2013

Appropriation:  $8,971,000

## FY 2012

Appropriation:  $9,466,000

## FY 2011

The Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, P.L. 112-10, was passed by Congress on April 15, 2011.  It provides funding for the Department of Education for the remainder of Federal Fiscal Year (FY) 2011.  The FY 2011 appropriation for MSEIP is $9,483,994, a reduction of $19,006 from the 2010 level.  We intend to use an estimated $3,053,984 for new awards.   The Department anticipates no reduction in continuation awards. 

## FY 2010

Number of new awards: 22Average new award: $185,000Total new award funding: $4,071,000

Number of continuation awards: 31Average continuation award:  $175,000Total continuation award funding: $5,432,000

Peer review of new award applications: 0

Total award funding:   $9,503,000Total number of awards:  53

Institutional Service Home
*Note:*Students cannot apply for  assistance directly from the U.S. Department of Education but should contact  their institutions for further information and guidance. Institutions have the  responsibility of determining how grants will be distributed to students, how  the amount of each student grant is calculated, and the development of any  instructions or directions that are provided to students about the grant.

### How to Apply for Funding: HEERF  II-Student Aid Portion (CFDA 84.425E)

*Note:  Application is only required if institution did **not**receive a CARES Act  HEERF Student Aid Portion award.*

- Instructions for Application 
- Grants.gov  Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants 
- How to upload a Workspace   Applicant Overview Training for  Grants.gov  Training Resources for Grants.gov  Endowment Excise Tax Form for Submission    - Note: Only institutions subject to the tax described are required to complete and submit this form once.  Letter from the Acting Assistant Secretary (February 25, 2021)  Letter from the Acting Assistant Secretary (January 14, 2021)  Notice Inviting Applications: (a)(1) Student Aid Portion (CFDA 84.425E)   Certification & Agreement: (a)(1) Student Aid Portion (CFDA 84.425E) (Gold C&A)  *Note: This is for institutions that did NOT receive CARES Act HEERF  Student Aid Portion funding. This completed form must be submitted on  Grants.gov as part of the application process.*  Supplemental Agreement: (a)(1) Student Aid Portion (CFDA 84.425E)    *Note: This is for institutions that did receive CARES Act HEERF  Student Aid Portion funding. This document is provided for reference as an  example of the agreement that will be attached to your institution’s  supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the supplement is  automatically made.*  Formula allocations    -  Allocations for Section 314(a)(1) of CRRSAA Act
  -   Methodology for Calculating Allocations   Frequently Asked Questions      - (a)(1) Frequently Asked Questions  (Issued January 14, 2021, revised March 19, 2021)      Return to the CRRSAA HEERF II Website here.            Last Modified: 03/30/2021
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132620 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132620 

 COA: 260761 

Ingham CC: 03-000461-FC 

AARON DANIEL CANTLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 12, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0319 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 26, 2007 

 Clerk
#### 247.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
3.104-2 General. ( a ) This section implements 41 U.S.C. chapter 21, Restrictions on Obtaining and Disclosing Certain Information. Agency supplementation of 3.104, including specific definitions to identify individuals who occupy positions specified in 3.104-3(d)(1)(ii), and any clauses required by 3.104 must be approved by the senior procurement executive of the agency, unless a law establishes a higher level of approval for that agency.
( b ) Agency officials are reminded that there are other statutes and regulations that deal with the same or related prohibited conduct, for example— ( 1 ) The offer or acceptance of a bribe or gratuity is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 201 and 10 U.S.C. 4651. The acceptance of a gift, under certain circumstances, is prohibited by 5 U.S.C. 7353 and 5 CFR part 2635;
( 2 ) Contacts with an offeror during the conduct of an acquisition may constitute “seeking employment,”(see subpart F of 5 CFR part 2636 and 3.104-3(c)(2)). Government officers and employees (employees) are prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 208 and 5 CFR part 2635 from participating personally and substantially in any particular matter that would affect the financial interests of any person with whom the employee is seeking employment. An employee who engages in negotiations or is otherwise seeking employment with an offeror or who has an arrangement concerning future employment with an offeror must comply with the applicable disqualification requirements of 5 CFR 2635.604 and 2635.606. The statutory prohibition in 18 U.S.C. 208 also may require an employee's disqualification from participation in the acquisition even if the employee's duties may not be considered “participating personally and substantially,” as this term is defined in 3.104-1;
( 3 ) Post-employment restrictions are covered by 18 U.S.C. 207 and 5 CFR parts 2637 and 2641, that prohibit certain activities by former Government employees, including representation of a contractor before the Government in relation to any contract or other particular matter involving specific parties on which the former employee participated personally and substantially while employed by the Government. Additional restrictions apply to certain senior Government employees and for particular matters under an employee's official responsibility;
( 4 ) Parts 14 and 15 place restrictions on the release of information related to procurements and other contractor information that must be protected under 18 U.S.C. 1905;
( 5 ) Release of information both before and after award (see 3.104-4) may be prohibited by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905), and other laws; and
( 6 ) Using nonpublic information to further an employee's private interest or that of another and engaging in a financial transaction using nonpublic information are prohibited by 5 CFR 2635.703.
[67 FR 13059, Mar. 20, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 24196, Apr. 29, 2014; 87 FR 73895 Dec. 1, 2022]
New click here

New        - Listed by Absolute Priority  click here 
        - Listed by Calendar Date   click here
        
**Program Office:**Federal TRIO Programs

**CFDA Number   :**	84.103A**Program Type  :**  Discretionary/Competitive Grants**Also Known As:** TRIO Staff Training (This is one of eight TRIO programs.)

        Program Description
        
Through a grant competition, funds are awarded to institutions of higher education and other public and private nonprofit institutions and organizations to support training to enhance the skills and expertise of project directors and staff employed in the Federal TRIO Programs. Funds may be used for conferences, seminars, internships, workshops, or the publication of manuals. Training topics are based on priorities established by the Secretary of Education and announced in Federal Register notices inviting applications.

        Types of Projects
        
Annual training is provided via electronic and live conferences and webinars; internships, seminars, workshops, and the publication of manuals designed to improve the operation of TRIO projects.  These trainings are carried out in the various regions to ensure that growth opportunities are available to all TRIO personnel in the local projects.  The topics covered in the trainings include but are not limited to legislative and regulatory requirements; assisting students in receiving adequate financial aid; the design and operation of model programs; the use of appropriate educational technology; and strategies for recruiting and serving hard to reach populations.

          Last Modified: 02/28/2024
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Flow International
Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K/A for the year ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Light, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ STEPHEN R. LIGHT       
|Stephen R. Light           
|Principal Executive Officer
|December 17, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 8078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16860 and #16861; Florida Disaster Number FL-
00163]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Florida dated 01/28/2021. Incident: Hurricane 
Sally. Incident Period: 09/13/2020 through 09/18/2020.

DATES: Issued on 01/28/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/29/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/28/2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Washington.
Contiguous Counties:
    Florida: Bay, Holmes, Jackson, Walton.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere..................     2.375
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     1.188
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere..................     6.000
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     3.000
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere....     2.750
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.     2.750
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      3.000
   Available Elsewhere........................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.     2.750
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 16860 8 
and for economic injury is 16861 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Florida.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Tami Perriello,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-02213 Filed 2-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### 2832.006-3 Responsibilities.

DOJ personnel shall immediately report, in writing, to the contracting officer and the OIG any apparent or suspected contractor request for advance, partial, or progress payments based on fraud.
EXHIBIT 23


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Prospectus
constituting  part  of  the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-40729)
and  to  the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8  (Nos.  333-43595,  333-42375,  333-34743, 333-34699, 333-31265, 33-44115,
33-31819,  33-23504, 33-7499, 2-89925, 33-10106, 33-38044, 33-16987, 33-62603)
of Compaq Computer Corporation of our report dated January 21, 1998, except as
to  Note  11,  which is as of January 26, 1998, appearing on page 20 of Compaq
Computer  Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1997.  We also consent to the references to us under the heading "Selected
Consolidated  Financial  Data"  in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended  December  31,  1997.  However, it should be noted that Price Waterhouse
LLP has not prepared or certified such "Selected Consolidated Financial Data."







/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
------------------------
PRICE  WATERHOUSE  LLP


Houston,  Texas
February  19,  1998
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

PRAIRIE POINTE CONDOMINIUM )

ASSOCIATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 3115

)

QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

During this Court’s February 26 motion call it had occasion

to address, and to deny without prejudice, the motion of

defendant QBE Insurance Corporation (“QBE”) for leave to file a

counterclaim. This memorandum order is intended to supplement

that ruling, because the proposed counterclaim was annexed to

QBE’s Answer and Affirmative Defenses (“ADs”) to the Complaint

brought against it by Prairie Pointe Condominium Association

(“Prairie Point”), and that latter portion of QBE’s filing calls

for some brief comments.

First, the denial of leave to file the proposed counterclaim

does not of course affect adversely QBE’s entitlement to

file--more accurately, refile its responsive pleading to the 1

Complaint. That aspect of QBE’s filing will stand, subject only

to a few problematic aspects dealt with hereafter.

 What is said here could have been raised when QBE filed 1

its original Answer and ADs last May, but this Court simply did

not then scrutinize it as it has had to do for current purposes.
To begin with, Answer ¶¶4 and 11 are wrong in stating that

the corresponding allegations in the Complaint “requir[e] no

answer” because they constitute conclusions of law--see App’x ¶2

to State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276, 278

(N.D. Ill. 2001). Fed. R. Civ. P. (“Rule”) 8(b)(1)(B) calls for

answers, and QBE must provide them. In that respect, QBE’s

partial denials of the allegations in those paragraphs appear to

be mere quibbles.

Next, AD 1, which is the equivalent of a Rule 12(b)(6)

motion, is unacceptable in the skeletal form in which it is

tendered. If QBE really believes that Prairie Pointe has failed

to state a claim (not a “cause of action,” which is the different

concept applicable under state law) it must file such a motion,

properly fleshed out, and present it for consideration.

Finally, both AD 2 and AD 4 contain “to the extent”

language--a sure tipoff that QBE has not satisfied the

requirement of notice pleading that is required of both

defendants and plaintiffs in federal litigation. If QBE can

identify a real deficiency on Prairie Pointe’s part in either of

those respects, its assertions must be particularized so that

Prairie Pointe’s counsel and this Court will understand just what

is being claimed.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: February 26, 2013

2
THE ATTO~CNEY GENERAL 

0~ TEXAS 

Au- 1%. Texas 

March 26, 1962 

Hon. Harold Hollingeworth Opinion No. WW-1283 

County Attorney 

Kaufman .C~ounty Re: Whether Article 286a of 

Kaufman, Texas Vernon's Penal Code applies 

to the sale of mobile homes. 

Dear Mr. Hollingsworth: 

In your recent letter you request an opinion as 

to whether Article 286a of Vernon's Penal Code prohibits 

the sale of mobile homes (house trailers). 

Article 286a provides in part as follows: 

"Section 1. Any person, on both the 

two (2) consecutive days of Saturday and 

Sunday, who aells or offers for sale or 

shell compel, force,or oblige his employees 

to sell any . . . motor vehicles; . . . shall 

be guilty o$ a misdemeanor. Each separate 

sale shall constitute a separate offense." 

The prohibition of the Act includes "motor vehicles." 

It does not cover mobile homes or house trailers. A motor 

vehicle by definition is a self-propelled vehicle. Article 

67Olh, Section 1, Subdivision 3, Vernon's Civil Statutes; 

Article 6675a-1, Section (b), Vernon's Civil Statutes; 

Prudential Insurance Company of Great Britain ,v. Associated 

P. Lloyds 250 SW2d 477~ 479 480 (Ci 

36-1, 

A 

Article 14 Section 1: Veion's Pen% C% 

19521 Compare 

wheri for 

the purpose of the Motor Vehicle Certificate o$ Tltle'Act, 

the term "motor vehicle" includes "house trailers." Inasmuch 

as mobile homes or house trailers are not self-propelled they 

are notincluded In the Items which cannot be sold under the 

prohibitLoon of Article 286a, V.P.C. 

However, we call your attention to Article 286, V.P.,C. 

which provides that: 

'*Any merchant, grocer, or dealer in 

nmres or merchandise or traders in any 

business whatsoever, . . . or the agent 

or employee 

sell, barter 

person, who shall 

. . . on Sunday shall 

be fined not han Twenty or more 

than Fifty Dollars." 
Hon. Harold Hollingsworth Page 2 Opinion No. WW-1283 

The constitutionality of these Sunday laws has 

been upheld. Gabel v. Houston, 29 Tex. 336 (1867) Bohl 

v. State, 3 Cr‘im. Reports, 683; Usener v. State,8 Ers 

Reports 177; Ex Parte Sundetrom,-83!! 207 

Whitcomb v. State, 17 S!?-258 LJ? 

[T ex. App. 18881, ,' 

SW 642 (T 

ex. App. 1891, Todd v. State, 

6, 

A p. 

(Tex: Crg: 1 B 59). 

1892);'and Clark v. State, 319 .%?d 

It is therefore our opinion that 

whereas Article 286a does not prohibit the sale of mobile 

homes or house trailers on either of the two consecutive 

days of Saturday and Sunday, 

hibit such sales on Sunday. 

Article 286, V.P.C.,does proSUMMARY 

Article 286a, Vernon's Penal Code, does 

not prohibit the sale on both the consecutive days of Saturday and Sunday of mobile 

homes or house trailers. Article 286, V.P.C., 

does prevent the sale of mobile homes or house 

trailers on Sunday. 

Yours very truly, 

NVS:bjb 

APPROVED: 

yAfii?Lr~4 

Assistan; Attorney General 

OPINION COMMITTEE: 

W; V. Gap ert, Chairman 

IrwinR. z almanson 

Iola Wilcox 

W. 0. Shultz 

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.