alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chart 11374HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       11374          Edition:       35          Edition       Date: September       2009          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/17/2010     LNM -       7/6/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Dr. G. NEIL GARRETT, DDS, PC., )

on behalf of itself and a class, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 12 CV 5826

)

v. )

) Honorable Judge Elaine E. Bucklo

GLOBAL WELLNESS GROUP, LLC, and ) Magistrate Judge Michael T. Mason

AMERISCIENCES WELLNESS GROUP, LLC, )

and JOHN DOES 1-10 )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT

This matter coming to be heard on prove-up on damages and fees and costs in

support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default, all parties having notice and the Court being

fully advised in its premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

Default judgment is entered against Defendant Global Wellness Group, LLC, and

in Plaintiff’s favor, in the amount of $1,500.00 for plaintiff in statutory damages, plus $2,473.00

in attorney’s fees and $470.00 in costs of suit. 

Defendant Global Wellness Group, LLC is enjoined from further transmitting

unsolicited facsimile advertisements into the state of Illinois to plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s individual claims against John Does 1-10 are dismissed with prejudice

and without costs, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.

Dated: Dec. 14, 2012 

 Judge 

Case: 1:12-cv-05826 Document #: 19 Filed: 12/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:149
# C_2018014EN.01000501.xml

| 16.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2018/C 14/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Andorra

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 25th anniversary of the Andorran Constitution

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design depicts the ‘Monument to the Men and Women of Andorra who launched the Constitution’, which stands in the square of the Consell General (Andorra’s Parliament). This monument shows the silhouettes of a man and a woman and commemorates the will expressed by the Andorran citizenry, in the referendum held on 14 March 1993, to become a constitutional state, democratic and social, as expressed in article 1 of the Constitution. To the right of the monument there is the map of Andorra with the Latin inscription ‘VIRTVS VNITA FORTIOR’ (virtue united is stronger) inside, which is the state motto of the Principality of Andorra. Surrounding the design there are the inscriptions ‘25è ANIVERSARI DE LA CONSTITUCIÓ 1993-2018’ (25th anniversary of the Constitution 1993-2018) and the name of the country ‘ANDORRA’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued
  :

Estimated number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : First trimester of 2018

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
3006.303-270 Content. ( a ) ( 9 ) ( iv ) For a proposed contract subject to the restrictions of (HSAR) 48 CFR 3006.302-270(d)(1)(iii) and where (FAR) 48 CFR 6.302-2 is cited as the authority, the exceptional circumstances allowing for an award for a period of performance in excess of 150 days.
[77 FR 50634, Aug. 22, 2012]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 334 

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Senate Chamber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2017 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Senate 

Chamber. 

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules 

2 for the Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United 

3 States Capitol and Senate Office Buildings (prohibiting 

4 the taking of pictures in the Senate Chamber) be tempo5 rarily suspended for the sole and specific purpose of per6 mitting the Senate Photographic Studio to photograph the 

7 Senate in actual session on Tuesday, December 5, 2017, 

8 at the hour of 2:15 p.m. 

9 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is au10 thorized and directed to make the necessary arrangements 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 334 ATS 

1 therefore, which arrangements shall provide for a min2 imum of disruption to Senate proceedings. 

Æ 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
|Color photo of Secretary Rod PaigeAdditional photos
|---------------------------------------------------

Education Secretary Rod Paige was born in Monticello, Mississippi, and he went to school there. Both of his parents were public school educators who taught him a lot and insisted that he read many books.

As the oldest kid in his family, he was in charge of making sure that his brother and sisters did all their homework every night.

After high school, he liked learning so much that he went on to college and kept graduating with degrees until he got the highest degree there is in Education.

Secretary Paige has been a teacher, a football coach, a college athletic director, a Dean of a College of Education, a school board president, and the Superintendent of all the schools in Houstonwhich is one of the largest school districts in America.

Secretary Paige really knows his way around a school!

Then in 2001, President Bush picked him to be the Secretary of Education for all of the schools in the United States. Now he is in charge of helping President Bush make sure that every one of us kids in America gets a really great education.

Secretary Paige is only the seventh person ever to be Secretary of Education of the United States.  And he loves to wear his cowboy bootsespecially when he kicks back with a good book to read.

|Last Modified: 08/23/2003
|-------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-40729, and No. 333-36750) and the related prospectuses and in
the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-74601, No. 333-64989, No.
333-61176, No. 333-56677, No. 333-43595, No. 333-42375, No. 333-34743, No.
333-34699, No. 333-31265, No. 33-44115, No. 33-31819, No. 33-23504, No. 33-7499,
No. 2-89925, No. 33-10106, No. 33-30697, No. 33-38044, No. 33-16987, No.
33-62603, and 333-36218) of Compaq Computer Corporation of our reports dated
January 16, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 2001.


                                       Ernst & Young LLP


Houston, Texas
January 29, 2002
###### Editorial Note on Part 2453

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2453 appear at 64 FR 46101, Aug. 23, 1999.

#### 2453.227 Patents, data, and copyrights.
Exemption Request - 121.333

Leo D Hollis

AFS-220, Air Carrier Operations

t

o

:

Chuck.Schramek 09/30/2011 10:05 AM

Cc: Richard Clarke, D K Deaderick, Jeanine Persons, Ida Klepper, Keira 

Jones, Nancy L Claussen

Mr. Schramek:

We requested the FAA’s Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) to review and 

evaluate your request for an exemption to certain requirements in 14 CFR part 121 § 

121.333. We have received the results of that evaluation. CAMI stated that the 

requirements in § 121.333 recognize a difference between non-emergency flight 

between 10,000 and 14,000 feet as addressed in § 121.329 and flight at these altitudes 

following a decompression and subsequent rapid descent. In the latter situation, 

pulmonary sequelae of barotraumas such as arterial gas embolisms and alveolar 

rupture may be present in some passengers. The standard of care for such 

emergencies still includes the provision of continuous supplemental oxygen.

We recognize that decompression is an extremely rare event and that a decompression 

over a mountainous area requiring that the flight stay above 10,000 ft is even more 

remote. Nonetheless, an increasingly older flying population will predictably have more 

medical conditions that are affected by hypoxia at 14,000 feet. 

In order to complete our technical analysis of your petition for exemption, the FAA is 

requesting the submission of additional data to the docket. Please provide analysis of 

the potential passenger population and the passenger health issues on the affected 

routes including consideration for additional portable emergency oxygen systems, 

medical supplies, flight attendant training and operational plans. Additionally, a plan 

should be proposed that addresses how additional medical support will be provided to 

passengers with barotraumatic injuries or compromised cardiopulmonary function in the 

event of a decompression.

Leo Hollis

Aviation Safety Inspector

Aircraft Dispatcher

Air Transportation Division - AFS-220

(202) 493-5508
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

VANESSA L. NAISHA,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellant,

v.

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.,

Defendant Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 295, 2022

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N19C-07-083

§ 

§

§

§

§

Submitted: June 23, 2023

Decided: August 16, 2023

Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the parties’ briefs and the Superior Court record, we 

find it evident that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for 

the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its July 15, 2022 bench ruling granting 

the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.)

RONALD McCLAIN #K-80999, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 2274

)

ACTING WARDEN GLEN AUSTIN, )

)

Respondent. )

STATEMENT AS TO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

This Court’s April 2, 2012 memorandum opinion and order

(“Opinion”) dismissed the 28 U.S.C. §2254 Petition for Writ of 1

Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) that had been filed by pro se

petitioner Ronald McClain (“McClain”) to attack his January 31,

2003 state court conviction on a charge of aggravated arson, on

which he is serving a 12 year sentence. That dismissal, based on

the preliminary review called for by Rule 4 of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District

Courts, was predicated on the Petition’s patent untimeliness.

Now McClain seeks to appeal that dismissal order and has

moved for the issuance of a certificate of appealability (“COA”). 

This statement explains why in this Court’s view such a

certificate should not issue.

As the Opinion reflects, the untimeliness of the Petition

resulted from the Illinois courts’ unequivocal denial of

 Further citations to provisions of Title 28 will simply 1

take the form “Section --”.
McClain’s effort to file a second petition for post-conviction

relief in the state court system. Because that denial created

more than a one-year gap during which no such post-conviction

proceeding was “pending” to toll the one-year limitations clock

established by Section 2244(d)(1), the current federal Petition

was plainly out of time (see Martinez v. Jones, 556 F.3d 637, 639

(7th Cir. 2009)(per curiam)).

Because Section 2244(d)(2) is unambiguous in that respect,

this Court sees no predicate for equitable tolling, and it is

accordingly of the view that no certificate of appealability

should issue. McClain is of course free to present the same

question to the Court of Appeals.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: May 3, 2012

2
# American Indian Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Program

# Part F, 84.031T

# FY 2015 Noncompeting Continuation (NCC) Awards

09/25/2015
**Who May Apply: (specifically)** The Special Olympics organization may apply.
| Name                                                                                    |   | Percentage owned                                        |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Fushi Holdings, Inc.( Fushi Holdings)                                                   |   | 100%                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                    |
| Fushi International (Dalian) Bimetallic Cable Co., Ltd. (Fushi International (Dalian))  |   | 100%                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                    |
| Fushi International (Jiangsu) Bimetallic Cable Co., Ltd (Fushi International (Jiangsu)) |   | 100%                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                    |
| Dalian Jinchuan Power Cable Co., Ltd.                                                   |   | 100%                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                    |
| Dalian Fushi Bimetallic Wire Manufacturing, Co., Ltd. (Dalian Fushi)                    |   | 0% (control is through a contractual relationship only) |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                    |
| Copperweld Bimetallic, LLC                                                              |   | 100%                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                    |
| Copperweld Bimetallic LLC, UK                                                           |   | 100%                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                    |
| Shanghai Hongtai Industrial Co., Ltd                                                    |   | 100%                                                    |
|                                                                                    |   |                                                    |

----
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## Related Web Sites

                - Howard University
                - Howard University Hospital

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
');
	document.write('

Home|
About |
Resources|
**Webinar**



green-strides

The Green Strides Webinar Series provides school communities the tools to reduce their schools' environmental impact and costs; improve health and wellness; and teach effective environmental education.  It provides all schools access to the resources that help them move toward the Pillars of our U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools recognition award.



U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools
 green-ribbon
<PAGE>   1

                                                                          EX-10V


                        THE CHASE MANHATTAN CORPORATION
                     ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM


                            INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT



         WHEREAS, The Chase Manhattan Corporation has reserved the right to
amend The Chase Manhattan Corporation Annual Incentive Compensation Program (the
"Program"), which sets forth the principles and primary terms and provisions for
annual incentive compensation plans and programs maintained for employees of The
Chase Manhattan Corporation and its subsidiaries;


         WHEREAS, The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. and certain other subsidiaries
of The Chase Manhattan Corporation have implemented plans for incentive awards
which provide for annual cash bonuses to be paid to selected employees, and such
plans operate in accordance with the Program under the supervision of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of The Chase Manhattan
Corporation;


         WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of The
Chase Manhattan Corporation has the authority to amend the Program and now
desires to amend the Program as set forth in this Instrument of Amendment;


         NOW, THEREFORE, the Program is hereby amended as follows:

1. Clause (b) of Section 6 of the Program is hereby amended by adding to end
thereof the following:


         ; provided, however, that any Approved Change in Control shall not
         constitute a "change in control" for purposes of any Plan. As used
         herein, the term "Approved Change in Control" means any "change in
         control" occurring by reason of or upon the occurrence of the
         transactions and events contemplated by the Merger Agreement. "Merger
         Agreement" means any agreement or plan of merger or consolidation
         between The Chase Manhattan Corporation and Chemical Banking
         Corporation that is approved by the Boards of Directors of The Chase
         Manhattan Corporation and Chemical Banking Corporation on or before
         September 30, 1995, as modified from time to time.



<PAGE>   2

                                       2


2. This Instrument of Amendment shall be effective as of August 25, 1995.



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Compensation Committee of The Chase Manhattan
Corporation has caused this Instrument of Amendment to be executed as of August
25, 1995.



                                                 THE CHASE MANHATTAN CORPORATION



                                                 By:  /s/  JOHN J. FARRELL
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    John J. Farrell
                                                    Executive Vice President
#### GTP Leisure Products, Inc., Appellant, v B-W Footwear Company, Inc., Respondent.

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at Special Term. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court— strike defense, summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Moule, JJ.