alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Europeiska unionens C 394A/27 n

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 394A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 58 årgången27 november 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 394A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

58 årgången27 november 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Eurojust |
| 2015/C 394A/01 | Eurojust söker en administrativ direktör (lönenivå AD 14) — Haag (Nederländerna) – 15/EJ/04 | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Eurojust

2015/C 394A/01

Eurojust söker en administrativ direktör (lönenivå AD 14) — Haag (Nederländerna) – 15/EJ/04

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Eurojust

| 27.11.2015 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2015

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 394/1

---

EUROJUST SÖKER EN ADMINISTRATIV DIREKTÖR (LÖNENIVÅ AD 14)

Haag (Nederländerna) – 15/EJ/04

(2015/C 394 A/01)

Den som är intresserad av tjänsten är välkommen att ansöka. Eurojust bildades 2002 för att utveckla ett effektivt samarbete mellan medlemsländernas rättsliga myndigheter i dess kamp mot grov gränsöverskridande och organiserad brottslighet. Eurojust består av ett kollegium av nationella medlemmar från varje medlemsland vilka är åklagare, domare eller polistjänstemän med motsvarande befogenheter. De nationella medlemmarna utgör tillsammans Kollegiet vilket är ansvarigt för organisationen och det operativa arbetet. Den administrativa direktören är, under överinseende av ordföranden för Kollegiet, ansvarig för organisationens sekretariat, för den dagliga förvaltningen och för personaladministration. Vänligen besök vår webbsida för mer detaljerad information beträffande den ledigförklarade tjänsten och om ansökningsförfarandet:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

Sista ansökningsdag är den 31 januari 2016 vid midnatt CET.

---
244.302 Requirements. ( a ) In lieu of the threshold at FAR 44.302(a), the ACO shall determine the need for a CPSR if a contractor's sales to the Government are expected to exceed $50 million during the next 12 months.
[84 FR 72249, Dec. 31, 2019]
|  |
|--|

Jessa Mirtle has served as Senior Counsel in the Office of the General Counsel since July 2021.  She previously worked as the general counsel for a State Educational Agency (SEA) leading a team responsible for legal advice on a wide range of issues pertaining to PreK-12 education including advising state leadership on  the education-related response to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Prior, she worked in higher education at a large state university as an employment attorney and senior labor relations associate, and as an in-house attorney for a municipality.

Her education comes from Trinity College and UConn Law School, both in Hartford, Connecticut. She also holds a certificate in Labor Relations/Contract Administration from Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations.
# Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs:

Filter Presses

Purchased Equipment Costs are the su m of the following cost elements: (1) Pump Costs (2) Tank Costs (3) Chemical Feed System Costs (4) Mixer Costs (5) Clarifier Costs (6) Filter Press Costs (7) Sand Filter Costs

Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary e quipment such as piping, valves, and controllers.

The following documents provided by a vendor supp ort EPA’s development of cost element (6) by providing filter press specifications and example configurations for filter presses used in the Steam

Electric cost model.

Note: Only the last diagram in this document, entitle d [Redacted] contains CBI information. The vendor stated that only the name of the co mpany, [Redacted], is confidential.[Schematic diagram has been redacted to prevent disclosure of material for which a claim of confidential

business information has been made.]
236.273 Construction in foreign countries. ( a ) In accordance with section 112 of the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015 (Division I of Pub. L. 113-235) and the same provision in subsequent military construction appropriations acts, military construction contracts funded with military construction appropriations, that are estimated to exceed $1,000,000 and are to be performed in the United States outlying areas in the Pacific and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in countries bordering the Arabian Gulf (*i.e.,* Iran, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Iraq), shall be awarded only to United States firms, unless— ( 1 ) The lowest responsive and responsible offer of a United States firm exceeds the lowest responsive and responsible offer of a foreign firm by more than 20 percent; or
( 2 ) The contract is for military construction on Kwajalein Atoll and the lowest responsive and responsible offer is submitted by a Marshallese firm.
( b ) See PGI 236.273(b) for guidance on technical working agreements with foreign governments.
[56 FR 36421, July 31, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 2856, Jan. 17, 1997; 62 FR 34127, June 24, 1997; 63 FR 11538, Mar. 9, 1998; 66 FR 49861, Oct. 1, 2001; 70 FR 35545, June 21, 2005. Redesignated and amended at 71 FR 9273, Feb. 23, 2006; 79 FR 44316, July 31, 2014; 80 FR 15911, Mar. 26, 2015]
2035.70 Contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the following clause in all solicitations and contracts for research and development by private contractors and universities and for other technical services, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Section 2052.235-70, Publication of Research Results;
( 2 ) Section 2052.235-72 Safety, Health and Fire Protection.
#### 1852.219-83 Limitation of the principal investigator—SBIR program.

As prescribed in 1819.7302(d), insert the following clause:

# Limitation of the Principal Investigator—SBIR Program (OCT 2006)

The primary employment of the principal investigator (PI) shall be with the small business concern (SBC)/Contractor during the conduct of this contract. Primary employment means that more than one-half of the principal investigator's time is spent in the employ of the SBC/Contractor. This precludes full-time employment with another organization. Deviations from these requirements must be approved in advance and in writing by the Contracting Officer and are not subject to a change in the firm-fixed price of the contract. The PI for this contract is (*insert name*).

(End of clause)

[71 FR 61688, Oct. 19, 2006]
#### The People of the State of New York v. Frank A. Weg.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted, insofar as to extend the defendant’s time to serve and file the record on appeal and appellant’s points to and including December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51339 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HUGO NOEL ROSALES, also known as Hugo Lopez Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-1165-ALL
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hugo Noel Rosales raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 2, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51339

2 The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EX-10.1



 







Exhibit 10.1




MODIFICATION AGREEMENT




     THIS MODIFICATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made at Cleveland, Ohio, this 3rd day of
April, 2006, between PARAGON REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND INVESTMENT TRUST, a Maryland business trust
(the “Trust”), and JAMES C. MASTANDREA, 9520 Metcalf Road, Waite Hill, Ohio 44094 (“Mastandrea”).



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the Trust previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated March 4, 2003
(“Employment Agreement”) with Mastandrea;



     WHEREAS, at the time set forth herein, Mastandrea holds the offices of Chairman of the Board
of Trustees, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Trust;



     WHEREAS, Mastandrea is expected to devote time to the business and objectives of the Trust;
and



     WHEREAS, the Trust and Mastandrea desire to enter into this Agreement pursuant to which the
Trust will continue to employ Mastandrea and Mastandrea will serve the Trust;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust and Mastandrea, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants herein contained, agree as follows:



     Sections 2(c) and 2(d) shall be deleted from the Employment Agreement and the following
substituted:



     2. POSITION, DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES.




       (c) At all times during the Contract Period, Mastandrea shall use his
best efforts to direct the business and objectives of the Trust. Nothing in
this Agreement shall preclude Mastandrea from devoting time to charitable and
community activities, service on boards of other companies (public or
private), or any other business or personal investment.




       (d) The duties to be performed by Mastandrea under this Agreement shall
be performed primarily in the United States, except for travel outside the
United States incident to his performance of services hereunder.


The remaining provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged.




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been signed by the Trust and Mastandrea as of the date
first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	PARAGON REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND INVESTMENT TRUST
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	     /s/ Daryl J. Carter
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	     Trustee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	     /s/ James C. Mastandrea	 	 
	 

	 	 	 
	 

	 	     James C. Mastandrea
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0325

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

AUSTIN ALLEN MILLARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 13, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 6 2022

04/06/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0325
(July 2, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Grace A. Schirmer, Appellant-Respondent, v. William V. Kain et al., as Commissioners of Election of the County of Orange, Respondents, and Frank Mancinelli, Appellant.

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law: (a) to direct a new primary election in the City of Newburgh (Orange County) for the Democratic party nomination to the office of City Councilman between the petitioner and Frank Maneinelli, as rival candidates; or (b) in the alternative, pursuant to section 333 of the Election Law, to direct the examination and preservation of all ballots cast at the primary election held in said city on June 2, 1964, which resulted in the election of Frank Maneinelli; and (e) for other relief, each of the candidates appeals as follows from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated June 25, 1964: (1) Petitioner appeals, as limited on argument, from so much of the order as denied her application for a new primary election; and (2) the rival candidate Maneinelli appeals from so much of the order as granted the application to the extent of permitting the petitioner to examine all such ballots; directing examination by the court of all “void, wholly blank and protested” ballots; and fixing the dates for such examinations. Order, insofar as appealed from by the respective parties, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. The respective examinations directed hy the order shall proceed on five days’ written notice or at such other times as the parties may mutually fix hy written stipulation. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2127
IBRAHIM MOHAMMED HASSEN, Petitioner, versus JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A29-694-250) Submitted: June 26, 2003 Decided: July 10, 2003 Before MOTZ, WIDENER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, David W. Dauenheimer, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ibrahim Mohammed Hassen, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”). The order denied his motion to reopen the Board’s dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum and suspension of deportation. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Hassen’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. SeeIn re: Hassen , No. A29-694-250 (B.I.A. Sept. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/Mark A. Severson
--------------------------------------------
Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer

May 3, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2419.803-70 Procedures for simplified acquisitions under the partnership agreement. ( a ) HUD contracting officers may use the procedures of FAR part 13 and HUDAR part 2413 to make purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold from 8(a) Participants. The following apply to such acquisitions: ( 1 ) Neither offering letters to, nor acceptance letters from the SBA are required.
( 2 ) The contracting officer will use the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database on the Internet (*http://www.ccr.gov*) to establish that the selected 8(a) firm is a current program participant.
( b ) Once an 8(a) contractor has been identified, the contracting officer will establish the price with the selected 8(a) contractor.
( c ) For acquisitions requiring an award document (e.g., purchase order), the contracting officer will: ( 1 ) Prepare and issue an award document in accordance with the applicable provisions of FAR part 13 and HUDAR part 2413. The applicable clauses prescribed in 2419.811-3 shall be included in the award document. The contracting officer will issue the award document directly to the 8(a) firm; and
( 2 ) Forward to the SBA District Office serving the 8(a) firm a copy of the award document within 5 days after the award is issued.
[77 FR 73528, Dec. 10, 2012]
##### 



Page 24

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Michael O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this
Certification:



|1. |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                       

Date: September 2, 2004/s/ Michael O. MooreMichael O. MooreExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### 246.702 General.
DAEL Home | DAEL Staff Directory | Correctional Education

**AEFLA website**New

WIOA Statewide Performance Reports

State Allocations

Policy Guidance and Policy Memoranda

The Division of Adult Education and Literacy (DAEL) administers adult education and literacy programs that help adults acquire the basic skills they need including reading, writing, math, English language proficiency, and problem-solving to be productive workers, family members, and citizens.

DAEL's responsibilities include:

- Administering the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (AEFLA) formula grant program to States (Title II of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA));
- Providing assistance to States to improve program quality, accountability and capacity; and
- Establishing national leadership activities to enhance the quality of adult education. 

To learn more about the adult education and literacy program, please visit our **AEFLA website** for the latest information and resources.

Individuals and local providers should check with their state offices for more information on how to obtain funding for adult education and literacy programs. Visit the Department’s  grant page for more information about other opportunities.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Cato Corporation,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that onthe date of this Certification:1. the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 3, 2007 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: December 12, 2007
#### 23.001 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Environmental* means environmental aspects of internal agency operations and activities, including those aspects related to energy and transportation functions.

*Greenhouse gas* means carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, nitrogen trifluoride, or sulfur hexafluoride.

*Toxic chemical* means a chemical or chemical category listed in 40 CFR 372.65.

[76 FR 31399, May 31, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 83096, Nov. 18, 2016; 89 FR 30238, Apr. 22, 2024]
#### Mary Corcoran, Respondent, v. Joseph T. O’Brien, Appellant. Mary Corcoran, Respondent, v. Kaye’s Auto Exchange, Inc., Appellant.

These cases were submitted to the jury on the issue of fraudulent misrepresentation. No exception was taken by the defendants to the charge. The plaintiff purchased for $695 an automobile which she testified was represented by the defendant O’Brien, an employee of the defendant Kaye’s Auto Exchange, Inc., to be in “good condition”. Damages for fraud are computed pursuant to the out-of-pocket rule *(Sager*v. *Friedman,*270 N. Y. 472; *Reno*v. *Bull,*226 N. Y. 546) and the plaintiff’s damages were the difference between $695 and the value of the automobile at the time of purchase. The plaintiff was the only witness on her own behalf and, not being qualified, offered no testimony as to value. She testified as.to the difficulties encountered in operating the automobile which included among other things a frayed fan belt, a dead battery, overheating and loss of water and oil but consisted principally of inability to start the oar on frequent occasions. The court did not charge the jury as to the legal measure of damages but, apparently being of the opinion that the plaintiff’s testimony established conclusively that the vehicle had no monetary worth, stated: *“*If you find that the plaintiff has sustained her burden of proof, your verdict will be in her favor in the sum of $695.” However, no exception was taken to the court’s instruction on the subject of damages or, as previously mentioned, to any portion of the charge. Moreover the defendants made no requests to charge (cf. *Leone*v. *Rose,*10 A D 2d 412). The charge, even though complained of as an erroneous statement of the law, was binding upon the parties *(Brown*v. *Du Frey,*1 N Y 2d 190, 195-196; *Smith*v. *City of Schenectady,*20 A D 2d 932). However, we may take cognizance of the error prejudicial to the appellants presented by the amount of the verdict *(Kahn*v. *Antevil,*248 App. Div. 889; CPLR 5501, subd. [c]) and we find the error so fundamental as to lead us to disregard in this case the usual requirement that an exception be taken to an erroneous charge. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts and in the interests of justice, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.