alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**RECOGNIZING INTERSEX AWARENESS DAY AND ANNOUNCING A NEW RESOURCE TO SUPPORT INTERSEX STUDENTS**

##### **October 26, 2021**

 

Today, in recognition of Intersex Awareness Day, the Office for Civil Rights issued a fact sheet, Supporting Intersex Students: A Resource for Students, Families, and Educators.

Title IX protects all students, including intersex students, from sex discrimination. OCR recognizes that intersex students may face challenges to fully and equally participating in school.

The fact sheet lists key issues intersex students may face in schools, including bullying, harassment, or other discrimination related to their physical characteristics or because they do not conform to sex stereotypes. The resource offers suggestions on ways schools can best support intersex students, such as using inclusive language in school mission statements and affirming students’ rights to be free from all forms of sex discrimination at school. The fact sheet also includes steps to take if students believe that they, or others, have been discriminated against at school based on sex.

Today’s release builds on the Biden-Harris Administration’s and OCR’s efforts to ensure equal educational opportunity for all students. We encourage you to read and share today’s fact sheet.

We hope this resource is helpful for students, educators, staff, and school leaders in raising awareness of the issues intersex students face and supporting their safety and well-being in school. For more information and resources, please see OCR’s Resources for LGBTQI+ Students.

Thank you for your partnership in these efforts as we work to ensure all students can thrive in safe and supportive school environments. 

Catherine E. Lhamon   Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights   U.S. Department of Education
  Last Modified: 02/18/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,972,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,420,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,972,906
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,721,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,864,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,222,785
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,873,427)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,721,818
<SALES>                                     14,230,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,265,814
<CGS>                                       14,196,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,279,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,083,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             128,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,009,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,009,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,009,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation
(the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Corporation.

/s/Mark A. Severson
-----------------------------------------
Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer

November 5, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
marquezfirstallonge.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    ALLONGE
TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

    DATED
FEBRUARY 28, 2006

    


    This Allonge (the “Allonge”), dated as
of December 1, 2006, attached to and forming a part of a Convertible Promissory
Note,, dated February 28, 2006 (collectively, the “Note”), made by ECOLOGY
COATINGS, INC., a California corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order
of CHRIS L. MARQUEZ (the “Holder”), in the original principal amount of
$300,000.

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              The
      first paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety
      as follows:

            


    

    


    FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, ECOLOGY COATINGS, INC., a California corporation
(“Company”),

    Promises
to pay Chris L. Marquez (“Holder”) or his registered assigns,, in lawful
money

    of
the United States of American the principal sum of THREE HUNDRED
THOUSAND

    Dollars
($300,000), or such lesser amount as shall equal the outstanding principal
amount

    Hereof,
together with interest from the date of this Convertible Promissory Note (the
“Note”)

    on
the unpaid principal balance at a rate equal to fifteen percent (15%) per annum,
computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a year of 365
days.  All unpaid principal,

    together
with any then unpaid and accrued interest and other amounts payable hereunder,
shall be due and payable on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2007 (the “Maturity
Date”), or (ii) when, upon or after the occurrence of an Event of Default (as
defined below), such amounts are declared due and payable by Holder or made
automatically due and payable in accordance

    with
the terms hereof.  This Note is one of a duly authorized series of
Convertible Promissory

    Notes
of the Company that may be issued by the Company from time to time of like
tenor

    And
effect (except for such variations as may be necessary to express the name of
the payee, the number, the date, and the principal amount of each note) each
dated on or after February 28, 2006 (the “Bridge Notes”).

    


    In all
other respects, the Note is confirmed, ratified and approved and, as amended by
this

    Allonge,
shall continue in full force and effect.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have caused this Second Allonge to be
executed and delivered as of the date and year first above written.

     

    


     

    ECOLOGY COATINGS, INC.

     

    


     

    


     

    By:  /s/ Adam S.
Tracy

     

    Adam S. Tracy, Esq.

     

    Its:           Vice
President

     

    


     

    


     

    Accepted and agreed to:

     

    


     

    


     

    /s/ Chris L
Marquez

     

    CHRIS L. MARQUEZ
368

Hylebos Waterway Fish Inju’ry Studies

Individual Data and Quality Assurance Results

CASE NARRATIVE

Reproductive Injury in Flatfish

DNA Adducts

DNA Adducts

Performance Evaluation

The PPL performance standard met 32P-labehng criteria.

Calibration

There were no deviations from the QA/SOP calibration criteria. All the calibration data that

were used to quantitate DNA adducts met the initial and continuing criteria detailed in the

“Commencement Bay Quality Assurance Plan” (QA Plan).

Method Blank

The acceptance criteria were met for the method blank.

Sample Duplicates

Two samples were processed and analyzed in duplicate. The relative percent differences

(RPD) for all analytes were less than 50%.

Commentary on Samples:

Data for sample 153-93 (#94-3568) was inadvertently left out of the initial draft and is now

included.

Further inspection of the chromatograms for samples 153-22 (#94-3540), 62 (#94.3656) and

108 (#94-3690) indicated that that quantitation was not practical and the results were

changed to CNQ (chromatogram not quantifiable).

Missing sample analyses:

Several samples (n=4) were lost because sufficient DNA could not be extracted. In addition,

twenty-seven samples were lost because the chromatograms were not quantifiable.

Values reported that are less than 10 nmo/lmol.

If the storage phosphor images of the radioactivity distribution on the chromatograms

are sufficiently clean and distinct, then values less than 10 nmols DNA adducts/mol DNA for

the large diagonal radioactive zone containing adducts derived from polycylic aromatic

compounds can be obtained. For the chromatography standards, the limit of detection for a

single, well resolved spot is 0.1 nmol DNA adduct/mol DNA.
369
370
371
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         194,447
<SECURITIES>                                 1,683,136
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,812,306
<PP&E>                                          74,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,839,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          697,683
<BONDS>                                        665,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           75,747
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,066,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,839,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,479
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (239,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (57,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (182,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (182,339)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
#### 239.7400 Scope.

This subpart prescribes policy and procedures for acquisition of telecommunications services and maintenance of telecommunications security. Telecommunications services meet the definition of information technology.

[62 FR 1060, Jan. 8, 1997, as amended at 71 FR 39011, July 11, 2006]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse

Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

NOTICE OF RECORD RETURN

March 26, 2014

To: Thomas G. Bruton

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 Northern District of Illinois

 327 S. Church Street

 Rockford , IL 61101-0000

No.: 13-1407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RITA A. CRUNDWELL,

Defendant - Appellant

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 3:12-cr-50027-1

Northern District of Illinois, Western Division

District Judge Philip G. Reinhard

The mandate or agency closing letter in this cause issued on December 9, 2013.

Returned herewith is the record which was transmitted to this court.

 RECORD ON APPEAL STATUS: Entire record returned consisting

of

 Exhibits: 1

Case: 13-1407 Document: 37 Filed: 03/26/2014 Pages: 2

Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 166 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1050
Please acknowledge receipt of these documents on the enclosed copy of this notice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Received above record, if any, from the Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Date: Received by:

_________________________ ____________________________________

form name: c7_Record_Return_toDC(form ID: 205)

Case: 13-1407 Document: 37 Filed: 03/26/2014 Pages: 2

Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 166 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1051
#### SCHUCK v. SCHWAB.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1 Landlord and. Tenant—Renewal Term—Written Notice—Waiver.

Where a lease contained a provision for renewal for a term upon the tenant’s written notice, and rent is accepted after the expiration of the original term, in accordance with the provisions for renewal, written notice by the tenant is waived, and he is entitled to hold for the balance of the renewal term.

¶ 1. See Landlord and Tenant, vol. 32, Cent. Dig. § 273.

*897Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Summary proceedings by Albert M. Schuck, landlord, to recover possession of premises from Henry E. Schwab, tenant. From a final order in favor of the tenant, the landlord appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Peter Cook, for appellant.

Moses H. Grossman and Joseph Fischer, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

The lease of 1900 contained all the provisions essential to the renewal term for five years, and the tenant’s written notice of an election to avail himself of the renewal was all that was contemplated to make the lease effective for the full period agreed. There was no written notice of the tenant’s election to renew, but the undisputed facts in evidence suffice for the finding that the landlord accepted the tenant under the provisions for renewal, and waived the written notice. For the period prior to renewal the rent was fixed at $72.50 per month, while the renewal was to be at the rate of $75 per month, payable on the 15th day of each month, together with an annual charge of $10, fixed as the tenant’s share of the water rates. At the end of the original period of the lease, May 1, 1901, the tenant paid $72.50 for a month’s rent, but the landlord insisted that the rent was then $75 per month “for the balance of the time of your tenancy.” Thereafter the tenant regularly paid $75 per month, agreeably to the renewal provisions, and was called by the landlord to pay the agreed share of the water rates “under the lease of the premises.” These transactions were consistent only with an adoption of the renewal provisions, and imported an agreement consummated with a waiver of the notice of election to renew, as required by the lease, with the result that both parties were bound for the renewal period. Probst v. Rochester S. L. Co., 171 N. Y. 584, 64 N. E. 504; Long v. Stafford, 103 N. Y. 274, 8 N. E. 522. Upon the record, the justice was authorized to find that the tenant had entered into no express agreement at variance with or as a substitute for this written lease; and the final order in favor of the tenant, upon the ground that the tenancy had not expired, cannot be assailed.

Final order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### 252.225-7063 Restriction on Acquisition of Components of T-AO 205 and T-ARC Class Vessels.

As prescribed in 225.7004-7(c), use the following clause:

# Restriction on Acquisition of Components of T-AO 205 AND T-ARC Class Vessels (MAY 2024)

(a) *Restriction.*

(1) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 4864, the following components of T-AO 205 and T-ARC class vessels must be manufactured in the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (United Kingdom):

(i) Auxiliary equipment, including pumps, for all shipboard services.

(ii) Propulsion system components, including engines, reduction gears, and propellers.

(iii) Shipboard cranes.

(iv) Spreaders for shipboard cranes.

(2) The Contractor shall deliver under this contract only T-AO 205 and T-ARC class vessel components, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this clause, manufactured in the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or the United Kingdom (10 U.S.C. 4864).

(b) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (b), in subcontracts for the components described in paragraph (a)(1) of this clause that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, including subcontracts for commercial products and commercial services.

(End of Clause)

[89 FR 46816, May 30, 2024]
231.205-71 Costs related to counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts. ( a ) *Scope.* This section implements the requirements of section 818(c)(2), National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Pub. L. 112-81), as modified by section 833, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Pub. L. 112-239), and section 885 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Pub. L. 114-92).
( b ) The costs of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts and the costs of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such parts are unallowable, unless— ( 1 ) The contractor has an operational system to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts that has been reviewed and approved by DoD pursuant to 244.303(b);
( 2 ) The counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts are Government-furnished property as defined in FAR 45.101 or were obtained by the contractor in accordance with the clause at 252.246-7008, Sources of Electronic Parts; and
( 3 ) The contractor— ( i ) Becomes aware of the counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts through inspection, testing, and authentication efforts of the contractor or its subcontractors; through a Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) alert; or by other means; and
( ii ) Provides timely (*i.e.,* within 60 days after the contractor becomes aware) written notice to— ( A ) The cognizant contracting officer(s); and
( B ) GIDEP (unless the contractor is a foreign corporation or partnership that does not have an office, place of business, or fiscal paying agent in the United States; or the counterfeit electronic part or suspect counterfeit electronic part is the subject of an on-going criminal investigation).
[81 FR 59515, Aug. 30, 2016]
#### 250.103 Contract adjustments.
Skip to Main Content Search this site:     - About    - FAQs 
  - CCO Staff 
- Events 
- Institutions 
- Resources    - Commanding Heights 
  - PRISM Journal 
  - Paper     Submissions 
  - Case Studies 
- Contact 

PRISM is a scholarly journal which promotes emerging thought and best practices in civilian-military capacity and collaboration in complex operations to enhance U.S. competency in these areas. "Complex Operations" includes the comprehensive approach of the “Three Ds”— Diplomacy, Defense and Development—encompassing stabilization, reconstruction, security, counterinsurgency, and irregular warfare planning and operations. 

PRISM welcomes articles on a broad range of complex operations issues, especially those that focus on the nexus of civil-military integration. PRISM is published online and in hardcopy, four times per year. PRISM is also supported by an interactive Web site that allows readers to search past issues, submit manuscripts, provide subject matter feedback, and post letters to the editor. 

PRISM evaluates submitted manuscripts against the following criteria: topical relevance, continuing education for national security professionals, scholarly standards of argumentation, and readability. PRISM solicits authors who aggressively seek out and identify problems that should be fixed irrespective of agency perspective, conventional wisdom, or published doctrine, and who recommend clear solutions or arm the reader with actionable knowledge. Manuscripts submitted should be between 2,500 and 8,000 words in length and sent via email to prism@ndu.edu. 

For further information and publication guidelines please click here to download a guidelines PDF. The 2010 deadlines for submission are: April 30, July 30, and November 1.
Archives
Vol. 1, No. 1

Vol. 1, No. 2

Vol. 1, No. 3
PRISM Subscription
To subscribe to PRISM please click here to submit your contact information.
 CCO - Center for Complex Operations - Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC 20319
Privacy Policy / Security Notice / RSS Feeds / E-mail: supportcenter@ccoportal.org
This information system is supported by the United States Department of Defense, the United States Department of State, United States Agency for International Development, and several other contributing agencies and organizations. It allows for the free exchange of ideas on or about the subject of complex operations but does not endorse any opinions expressed as United States government policy. This site was created in collaboration with the United States Institute of Peace.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Civil Case No. 1:12-cv-04676

)

v. )

)

JOHN DOES 1-50, )

)

Defendants. )

)

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOES 26, 45, 46, 48,49 AND 50 ONLY

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiff hereby voluntary dismisses John Does 26, 45, 46, 

48, 49 and 50 (“Defendants”) from this action without prejudice. Defendants were assigned the 

IP addresses 205.178.47.65, 64.233.211.155, 64.53.200.22, 69.47.21.0, 64.245.227.214 and 

67.152.183.232, respectively. For the avoidance of doubt, Plaintiff is not voluntarily dismissing 

any other Defendant.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendants have neither answered Plaintiff’s 

Complaint nor filed a motion for summary judgment.

Dated: November 23, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

NICOLETTI & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti, Esq. (P44419)

36880 Woodward Ave, Suite 100

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Tel: (248) 203-7800

Fax: (248) 203-7801

E-Fax: (248) 928-7051

Email: paul@nicoletti-associates.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 18 Filed: 11/23/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:193
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 23, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of 

record and interested parties through this system. 

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 18 Filed: 11/23/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:194