alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHAPARRAL RESOURCES, INC.

                                October 11, 2000




Mr. Dennis Staal
Capco Resources Ltd.
444 5th Avenue SW
Suite 2240
Calgary, Alberta
Canada  T2P2T8  403-9000


     Re: Purchase of Common Stock

Dear Dennis:

     This letter hereby amends that certain letter agreement, dated September
21, 2000, between Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the "Company") and Capco Resources
Ltd. ("Capco") relating to the acquisition of 1,612,903 shares of common stock,
par value $.0001 per share (the "Shares"), of the Company for an aggregate
purchase price of $3.0 million. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meaning set forth in the Letter Agreement. The Parties agree that
Section 1(a) of the Letter Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:

          "Capco agrees to purchase the Shares on the earlier of (a)
     October 30, 2000 or (b) consummation of the transactions contemplated
     pursuant to Section 3 of that certain Agreement and Release, dated
     August 25, 2000, by and among Greka Energy Corp. ("Greka"), Randeep S.
     Grewal, Capco, Capco Energy, Inc. and Ilyas Chaudhary by delivery to
     Chaparral the sum of $3.0 million, in cash, by wire transfer of
     immediately available funds."

     The Letter Agreement, as amended hereby, constitutes the entire agreement
between the Parties and supersede all prior oral or written agreements,
understandings, representations and warranties, and courses of conduct and
dealing between the Parties on the subject matter hereof.

     The Parties acknowledge and agree that except for the above-referenced
amendment to Section 1(a) of the Letter Agreement all of the provisions of the
Letter Agreement and the Pledge Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2000,
between the Company and Capco will remain in full force and effect.

     This letter may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will
be deemed to be an original copy of this letter and all of which, when taken
together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement.

     If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please sign and return one copy
of this letter, which thereupon will constitute our agreement with respect to
its subject matter.



      Very truly yours,


      /s/ Michael B. Young
      --------------------
      Michael B. Young
      Treasurer




Duly acknowledged and agreed this 11th day of October 2000.

CAPCO RESOURCES LTD.


/s/ Gene E. Hays (for) Dennis Staal
-----------------------------------
Dennis Staal
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the VICE CHAIRMAN-FINANCE, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING
OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
hereby certifies that to the best of their knowledge:  (i)
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. Dated: April 5, 2005
    /s/ Steven F. Udvar-HazySTEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY Dated: April 5, 2005
    /s/ Alan H. LundALAN H. LUND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JACQUES RIVERA,

Plaintiff,

v.

REYNALDO GUEVARA, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 12 C 4428

Hon. Joan B. Gottschall,

District Judge

Hon. Mary M. Rowland,

Magistrate Judge

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S POSITION PAPER ON JURY INSTRUCTIONS

Plaintiff JACQUES RIVERA, by his attorneys, respectfully submits the following 

position paper to assist the Court with unresolved jury-instruction issues, stating in support as 

follows:

1. Defendants’ Proposed Instruction No. 30 is withdrawn, and Defendants are 

considering withdrawing Defendants’ Proposed Instructions Nos. 2 and 15, given dismissal of 

Defendants and evidence that has come in at trial.

2. Plaintiff’s Proposed Instruction No. 26 should be edited to remove the bracketed 

language (“and during discovery in this case”).

3. With respect to Plaintiff’s Proposed Instruction No. 34, Plaintiff proposes that the 

second element should be revised to read: “The City of Chicago has a policy of concealing 

material exculpatory and/or impeachment evidence. The term ‘policy’ means: . . . .” See Doc. 

No. 543 at 35.

4. With respect to Defendants’ Proposed Instruction No. 35, Plaintiff proposes that 

the second element should be revised to read: “The City of Chicago knew that exculpatory 

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 652 Filed: 06/26/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:34794
and/or impeachment information would not be disclosed because there was a pattern of similar

violations or because it was highly predictable even without a pattern of similar constitutional 

violations.” See Doc. No. 543 at 37.

5. Plaintiff intends to drop his claim for lost wages in Plaintiff’s Proposed 

Instruction No. 47 (paragraph 3).

6. Plaintiff is dropping his claim for punitive damages against Defendant 

McLaughlin.

Respectfully Submitted, 

JACQUES RIVERA

By: /s/ Jon Loevy

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys 

Arthur Loevy Locke E. Bowman

Jon Loevy David Shapiro 

Russell Ainsworth Alexa Van Brunt

Anand Swaminathan RODERICK MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER

Steven Art Northwestern University School of Law

Rachel Brady 375 E. Chicago Avenue

Sean Starr Chicago, Illinois 60611

LOEVY & LOEVY (312) 503-0844

311 N. Aberdeen St., Third Floor

Chicago, IL 60607

(312) 243-5900 J. Samuel Tenenbaum

BLUHM LEGAL CLINIC

Northwestern University School of Law

375 E. Chicago Avenue

Chicago, Illinois 60611

(312) 503-8576

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 652 Filed: 06/26/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:34795
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jon Loevy, an attorney, hereby certify that on June 26, 2018, I filed the foregoing via 

the Court’s CM/ECF system and thereby served a copy on all counsel of record.

/s/ Jon Loevy

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 652 Filed: 06/26/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:34796
(If you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and reference that section.] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

Grant Birchmeier &et. al 

Plaintiff 

V. 

Carribbean Cruise Lines, Inc., & et.al 

Defendant 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case Number: 1:12-cv-04069 

Judge: Matthew Kennelly 

Magistrate Judge: Keys 

Supplemental Objections to Counsel's Motion to withdraw Represntation of Claimant Daisy Exum and 

Motion to have Orders 867,866, 849, & 846 vacated 

The Court set 8/6/2020 as the deadline for Claimant to submit objections to Class Motion (859). However, the 

Order was handed down prematurely, Order 866. Claimant requests Court to vacate Orders 867,866,849 & 

846, as it is evident and Claimant has provided substantial evidence that not only proves but well grounds her 

allegations that Class Counsel did indeed prejudice the Courts ahead of her latest proceedings before 

Honorable Judge Matthew Kennelly. 

The latest evidence coming from an email from Class Counsel to Ms. Exum where Class all but assured her 

they would secure an Order from the Court removing them from representing her, Order 866. 

Email excerpt: 

Scott RauscherLoevy & Loevy 

311 N. Aberdeen St., Third FloorChicago, IL 60607O:312.243.5900F:312.243.5902 

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:56 PM DE <daisye1028@gmail.com> wrote: 

"Further, if you are going to take the position that we are required to represent you individually on appeal, 

you should let us know that by the end of the week so that we can ask Judge Kennelly to issue an order 

confirming that we do not represent you for the appeal." 

Mr, Rauscher 

For the foregoing reasons and reasonings and evidence submitted in filings 863, 864 and 865, Claimant now 

petitions the Court to issue a favorable ruling to her Objections of Counsel's Motion to withdraw 

representation and that Judge Matthew Kennelly recuses himself from the case and all the above cited Orders 

in Paragraph 1 above be immediately vacated and assigned to a different Judge. 

s/Daisy Exum 

[If you need additional space for ANY section, please attacl:l an additional sheet and reference that section.] 

FILED 8/6/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

TG
# C_2016466EN.01000102.xml

| 14.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8201 — Randstad Holding/Monster Worldwide)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 466/02)

On 26 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8201. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8201. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 251

Amending rule XXXI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, to provide for 
                  timely consideration of nominations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2017

 Mr. Gardner submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending rule XXXI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, to provide for 
                  timely consideration of nominations.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. TIMELY CONSIDERATION OF NOMINATIONS.

    Rule XXXI of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs 3 through 7 as paragraphs 4 
        through 8, respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph 2 the following:
    ``3.(a) In this paragraph, the term `basic requirements' means--
            ``(1) an agreement with the Office of Government Ethics;
            ``(2) a financial disclosure form;
            ``(3) a background check conducted by the Federal Bureau of 
        Investigation;
            ``(4) a questionnaire of each relevant committee;
            ``(5) tax forms, if required by a relevant committee; and
            ``(6) any other requirements of a relevant committee.
    ``(b) If a nomination has not been confirmed or rejected not later 
than 180 days after the day on which the nominee completes the basic 
requirements, the appropriate committees shall be automatically 
discharged and the nomination shall be eligible for expedited 
consideration in accordance with subparagraph (c).
    ``(c)(1) The majority leader may provide notice that a nomination 
that is eligible for expedited consideration in accordance with this 
subparagraph shall be considered on an expedited basis.
    ``(2) Notwithstanding rule XXII, expedited consideration of a 
covered nomination under this subparagraph, including consideration of 
any debatable motion or appeal in connection therewith shall be limited 
to 2 hours, evenly divided in the usual form.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Leona Siminson, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Patricia Siminson and Another, Infants, et al., Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury and loss of services resulting from the collapse of a building, the defendant City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 4, 1963, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint; and the defendant Albro Contracting Corporation appeals from an order of said court, dated August 5, 1963, -which denied its motion for the same relief. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements against the defendants jointly. Plaintiffs -were not parties to the prior action. On this record a question of fact is presented as to liability of the respective defendants for collapse of the building. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|/s/    Paul R. Flanders                                                                
|Paul R. Flanders Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer August 11, 2004
237.173-3 Policy. ( a ) No detainee may be interrogated by contractor personnel.
( b ) Contractor personnel with proper training and security clearances may be used as linguists, interpreters, report writers, information technology technicians, and other employees filling ancillary positions, including as trainers of and advisors to interrogators, in interrogations of detainees if— ( 1 ) Such personnel are subject to the same laws, rules, procedures, and policies (including DoD Instruction 1100.22, Policy and Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix (*http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/110022p.pdf*); DoD Directive 2310.01E, The Department of Defense Detainee Program (*http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/231001p.pdf*); and DoD Directive 3115.09, DoD Intelligence Interrogations, Detainee Debriefings, and Tactical Questioning (*http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/311509p.pdf*)); pertaining to detainee operations and interrogations as those that apply to Government personnel in such positions in such interrogations; and
( 2 ) Appropriately qualified and trained DoD personnel (military or civilian) are available to oversee the contractor's performance and to ensure that contractor personnel do not perform activities that are prohibited under this section.
[75 FR 67633, Nov. 3, 2010]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0646

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

GUS CHRISTOPHER TOULATOS

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

SECTION S 61.39(b)

, 61.17(b)(1) AND (3) , & 6 1.156 CONCERNING USING EXPIRED

KNOWLEDGE TEST RESULTS TO APPLY FOR

THE AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOT PRACTICAL TEST

Submitted on July 15, 2015

G REGORY S. W INTON

, E SQ

. T HE A VIATION L AW F IRM

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway

Suite 300

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Tel: (301) 294

- 8550

Fax: (866) 568

- 9886

Attorney for Petitioner2

Petitioner, Gus Christopher Toulatos , by and through undersigned counsel, hereby seeks

to withdraw his Petition for Exemption from the requirements of Title 14 of the Code of Federal

Regulations Sections 61.39(b), 61.17(b)(1) and (3), & 61.156 concerning using expired

knowledge test results to apply for the Airline Transport Pilot Practical Test , Docket Number

FAA

- 2015

- 0646 . Mr. Toulatos independently obtained his Temporary Airline Transport Pilot

Certifi cate number 3105427 on June 10 th , 2015

, and therefore the basis for his Petition for

Exemption been rendered moot

.

WHEREFORE , petitioner, Gus Christopher Toulatos, respectfully requests that the

Administrator withdraw his Petition for Exemption from the requirements of Title 14 of the Code

of Federal Regulations Sections 61.39(b), 61.17(b)(1) and (3), & 61.156

, concerning using

expired knowledge test results to apply for the Airline Transport Pilot Practical Test, Docket

Number FAA

- 2015

- 0646.

Dated: July 15 , 2015

Respectfully submitted,

The Aviation Law Firm

/s/ Gregory S. Winton

Gregory S. Winton, Esq.

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway

Suite 300

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Tel: (301) 294

- 8550

Fax: (866) 568

- 9886

Attorney for Petitioner
#### 252.225-7042 Authorization to perform.

As prescribed in 225.1103(3), use the following provision:

# Authorization to Perform (APR 2003)

The offeror represents that it has been duly authorized to operate and to do business in the country or countries in which the contract is to be performed.

(End of provision)

[68 FR 15641, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 71 FR 39006, July 11, 2006]
Color photoSmall (shown here)

Color photoLarge

Color photoPrint-quality (zip file)

For additional photos, visit the Press Room's photo area.

|Last Modified: 04/20/2004
|-------------------------
#### 232.7102 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.232-7010, Levies on Contract Payments, in all solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.

[71 FR 69492, Dec. 1, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 37989, June 25, 2013; 88 FR 6587, Jan. 31, 2023]
# C_2017019EN.01000201.xml

| 20.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 January 2017

(2017/C 19/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0668 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4360 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86555 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5478 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0729 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0193 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,40 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3728 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4928 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0747 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4113 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4169 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2762 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4857 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5216 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 255,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5056 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3241 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5210 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 266,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7462 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,405 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,5802 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,759 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4223 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 23,4441 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,6875 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0668

JPY

Japanese yen

122,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4360

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86555

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5478

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0729

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0193

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,40

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3728

RON

Romanian leu

4,4928

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0747

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4113

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4169

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2762

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4857

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5216

KRW

South Korean won

1 255,90

ZAR

South African rand

14,5056

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3241

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5210

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 266,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7462

PHP

Philippine peso

53,405

RUB

Russian rouble

63,5802

THB

Thai baht

37,759

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4223

MXN

Mexican peso

23,4441

INR

Indian rupee

72,6875

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Marvin F. Romanow, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Nexen Inc., a Canadian Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
     the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    July 19, 2004                     /s/ Marvin F. Romanow
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Marvin F. Romanow
                                           Executive Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.