alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(b)

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jonathan S. Wood , Chief Financial Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
          ended March 31, 2004 ("Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

     and

     2.   All of the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
          of operations of the company.



Date: May 14, 2004                          /s/  Jonathan S. Wood
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Jonathan S. Wood
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### 242.200-70 Scope of subpart.

This subpart does not address the contract administration role of a contracting officer's representative (see 201.602).
#### 2152.243-70 Changes.

As prescribed in 2143.205, insert the following clause:

# Changes (OCT 2005)

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this clause, the Contracting Officer may at any time, by written order, and without notice to the sureties, if any, make changes within the general scope of this contract in any one or more of the following:

(1) Description of services to be performed;

(2) Time of performance (i.e., hours of the day, days of the week, etc.);

(3) Place of performance of the services.

(b) If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work under this contract, or the Contractor's liability under this contract, whether or not changed by the order, the Contracting Officer shall make an equitable adjustment in the contract price, the delivery schedule, or both, and shall modify the contract.

(c) The Contractor must assert its right to an adjustment under this clause within 30 days from the date of receipt of the written order. However, if the Contracting Officer decides that the facts justify it, the Contracting Officer may receive and act upon a proposal submitted before final payment of the contract.

(d) If the Contractor's proposal includes the cost of property made obsolete or excess by the change, the Contracting Officer shall have the right to prescribe the manner of the disposition of the property.

(e) Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause. However, nothing in this clause shall excuse the Contractor from proceeding with the contract as changed.

(f) The Contracting Officer shall not make any changes pursuant to paragraph (a) of this clause to conform this contract to any amendment in the LIFAR before the effective date of the amendment as provided for in LIFAR 2101.370.

(End of clause)

[58 FR 40381, July 28, 1993, as amended at 70 FR 41157, July 18, 2005]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 876 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 876

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 
   governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 
                   whether a child has special needs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 6 (legislative day, April 4), 2017

  Ms. Heitkamp (for herself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Heller, Mr. Schatz, Mr. 
 Hoeven, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Udall) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 
   governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 
                   whether a child has special needs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Adoption Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNIZING INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DETERMINING UNDER THE ADOPTION CREDIT WHETHER A CHILD HAS 
              SPECIAL NEEDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 23(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or Indian tribal 
        government'' after the words ``a State'', and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``or Indian tribal 
        government'' after the words ``such State''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(l)
GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay ING America
Insurance Holdings, Inc. a Delaware corporation, the sum of $75 million
($75,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 7.75%  per annum from the
date hereof, September 30, 1999 until paid.  In any event, this note
will mature on September 29, 2029.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate to
payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as well
as debts owed to all other classes of debtors, other than surplus note
holders, of Golden American Life Insurance Company in the event of (a)
the institution of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or
liquidation proceedings by or against Golden American Life Insurance
Company, or (b) the appointment of a Trustee, receiver or other
Conservator for a substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance
Company properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of the
final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.


                                GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By: /s/ Stephen J. Preston
                                   --------------------------------
                                     Stephen J. Preston, Executive
                                         Vice President


Attest by:

/s/ David L. Jacobson
--------------------------
David L. Jacobson
Senior Vice President and
    Assistant Secretary

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM SHUTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-3784

February 28, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

Chris W. Altenbernd of Banker Lopez Gassler P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
### How to Apply for Funding: HEERF  II-Historically Black Colleges and Universities (CFDA 84.425J)

*Note:  New applications are not required. Supplements will be automatically awarded.*

- Grants.gov  Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants
- How to upload a Workspace   Applicant Overview Training for  Grants.gov  Training Resources for Grants.gov  Endowment Excise Tax Form for Submission  Note: Only institutions subject to the tax described are required to complete and submit this form once.
Supplemental Agreement: (a)(2) Historically Black Colleges and Universities (CFDA 84.425J)(Purple)
*Note: This is for institutions that received CARES Act HEERF Strengthening Institutions Program funding. This document is provided  for reference as an example of the agreement  attached to your  institution’s supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the supplement  is automatically made.*
Calculation  of the Endowment Factor: (a)(2) Historically Black Colleges and Universities  (CFDA 84.425J)
*Note: This final  rule is to determine final allocations to HBCUs awarded under section 314  (a)(2) of CRSSAA. Regulations are effective April 22, 2021**.*
Formula allocations-  Allocations for Section 314(a)(2) of CRRSAA Act 
- Methodology for Calculating Allocations
Frequently Asked Questions- (a)(2) Frequently Asked Questions

  Return to the CRRSAA HEERF II Website here.
  Last Modified: 07/14/2021
> Notre Dame College (College) submitted an agreement to resolve  a Title IX compliance review that OCR initiated to investigate whether the  College was complying with Title IX with respect to the College’s policies,  procedures, and practices for addressing complaints regarding sexual harassment  and sexual violence filed by or on behalf of students.  Prior to the conclusion  of OCR’s investigation and any findings, the College asked to enter into the  Voluntary Resolution Agreement which, when fully implemented, will ensure that  the College does not discriminate on the basis of sex in the educational programs  or activities that it operates.  The agreement requires the College to revise  and publish its Title IX grievance procedure concerning complaints of sexual  harassment and sexual violence; to designate a Title IX coordinator to oversee  the College’s efforts to comply with Title IX; to ensure that the Title IX  coordinator, and any other College officials involved in processing complaints  of sexual harassment, receive appropriate training from the College and OCR  on Title IX, how to investigate complaints of sexual harassment and sexual  violence, and the link between alcohol abuse and sexual harassment/sexual violence;  to provide with OCR similar training on Title IX to College administrators,  professors, instructors, residential assistants, coaches, and other staff who  interact with students on a regular basis; to develop an ongoing Title IX training  program for College faculty and staff; to develop material concerning sexual  harassment and sexual violence for distribution to students; to create a campus  focus group consisting of leaders from the student community and College officials  to provide input regarding strategies for ensuring that students understand  their rights under Title IX; to host informational sessions for students regarding  Title IX, sexual harassment; to report to OCR regarding the number of sexual  harassment complaints it receives and how they were handled by the College  pursuant to its newly revised grievance procedures; to conduct periodic climate  checks with students to assess the effectiveness of these steps to ensure a  campus free of sexual harassment and sexual violence; and to coordinate with  local law enforcement to ensure that in instances where a complaint involves  conduct of a criminal nature, the College will be able to meet its obligation  under Title IX to promptly investigate complaints of sexual harassment and  sexual violence and to take appropriate interim steps to ensure the safety  of victims and the campus community. ***Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF (1.42M)    | ***Read    the Resolution Agreement***PDF (60K)

Top
#### Southern Railway Company *v.*Barfield.

Lumpkin, J.

1. In a suit for malicious prosecution, where the plaintiff testified in substance that he was prosecuted for the larceny of certain iron pipes which had been given to him by the agent of the railway company, and that a “law agent” of the defendant who “looked after” its litigation and looked up witnesses and the like, and who was acting in 'this case, negotiated in regard to a settlement, which would include the retention of the plaintiff in the employment of the defendant, and on failure of its consummation the plaintiff urged that a trial be had, but this was delayed' from time to time, there was no reversible error, if error at all, in allowing the plaintiff to testify that the “law agent” gave him as a reason why the case was not tried that an official of the railway company in Washington said that the case was handled too quickly.

*(a)*This is true although the plaintiff also testified that the “law agent” of the defendant was working in his behalf before he was “held out of ' service.”

2. Where the plaintiff was arrested on a warrant procured by the agent of *461the defendant, and was bound over by a magistrate to á city court, there was no error in admitting a transcript from the records of the city court showing that a prosecution against the defendant for a misdemeanor was dismissed in that court, together with evidence that there was no criminal ease against the plaintiff in that court except the one growing out of the transaction involved in the present case.

February 13, 1913.

Action for damages. Before Judge Maddox.. Floyd superior court. December 6, 1911.

*Maddox, McCamy & Shumate*and *George A. H. Harris & Son,*for plaintiff in error.

*Henry Walker, C. T. Clements,*and *Denny & Wright,*contra.

3. The criticism on the charge of the court as tp what was necessary to be shown in order to authorize a recovery by the plaintiff was without merit.

4. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and there was no error in overruling *the motion for*a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
225.301-1 Scope. ( a ) *Performance in a designated operational area* , as used in this section, means performance of a service or construction, as required by the contract. For supply contracts, the term includes services associated with the acquisition of supplies (e.g., installation or maintenance), but does not include production of the supplies or associated overhead functions.
( c ) For DoD, this section also applies to all personal services contracts.
### **OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY**

September 20, 2004

Dear Colleague:

As a new school year begins, we write to advise you of a recurrent issue that   we have encountered involving extra-curricular activities: the allocating of   awards or honors on the basis of race. We have found, for example, that some   school districts have racially separate Homecoming Queens and Kings, Most Popular   Student, Most Friendly, as well as other superlatives. We have also found that   school districts have assisted in facilitating racially-separate proms. Indeed,   our attorneys have been made aware of several examples of these types of activities   as recently as last year. 

These practices are inconsistent with federal law. The Civil Rights Division   of the Department of Justice and the Department of Education will act promptly   to remedy such violations where they occur, through litigation if necessary.

This letter does not suggest that these or similar practices are currently   ongoing in your school districts. We write only to make clear that such practices   are inconsistent with federal law and should not be tolerated. 

We thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. If you should   have any questions or are in need of assistance in dealing with this issue in   any district, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,

| _____________________________        Kenneth Marcus        Delegated the Authority of        Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights        U.S. Department of Education | _____________________________        R. Alexander Acosta        Assistant Attorney General        Civil Rights Division        U.S. Department of Justice |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Top
**Forecast Date: February 2, 2024**

The FY 2024 Forecast of U.S. Department of Education (ED) Contract Opportunities is available below. All items are pending availability of funds. The Department may, at any time, delay or cancel any or all Forecast items if the Department's requirements change.   All contract award dates are projections. The information is subject to change and is in no way binding on the Government. Interested parties should monitor FedBizOpps for notices providing specific information on current opportunities.

The US Department of ED publishes solicitations on SAM.GOV. SAM.GOV is a website where vendors can get the information, they need to bid on government contracts worth more than $25,000. Vendors can read a synopsis, download a solicitation, and sign up to receive alerts when existing notices are updated. Search for business opportunities on SAM.GOV by agency, posted date, classification code, and NAICS code. The GSA e-Buy website lists opportunities for GSA schedule holders and opportunities through Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWAC), Agency contracts, or direct awards to 8(a) firms. 

Small businesses, SBA 8(a)  certified, HUBZone certified, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business  (SDVOSB) Program certified and Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Program  certified businesses should check the opportunities on the Forecast they are  interested in. Businesses may contact the individuals named on the Forecast for  information about a specific requirement. 
Please update Capabilities at the following: OSDBU Small Business Customer Experience (SBCX)

Send any questions or concerns to the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) at small.business@ed.gov.

The Forecast is available for viewing and/or downloading:

 MS Excel (94 KB) - FY 2024 Forecast of Contract Opportunities

In order to view the ED Forecast, please download the file using Google Chrome.  Microsoft Explorer/Edge users  should download the Forecast workbook to their computer in order to open the  file.
Top
[Contracts Information]Send mail to: ocfoweb@ed.gov
  Last Modified: 02/02/2024
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
MasTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jose R. Mas, Chief Executive Officer of MasTec, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 4, 2011



/s/ Jose R. MasJose R. MasChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


The certification set
forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, or as a separate
disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
(Effective **January 11, 2024** until further notice)

| **Size  of Family Unit** | **48    Contiguous States, D.C., and Outlying Jurisdictions** | **Alaska** | **Hawaii** |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|
| **1**                    | $22,590                                                       | $28,215    | $25,965    |
| **2**                    | $30,660                                                       | $38,310    | $35,250    |
| **3**                    | $38,730                                                       | $48,405    | $44,535    |
| **4**                    | $46,800                                                       | $58,500    | $53,820    |
| **5**                    | $54,870                                                       | $68,595    | $63,105    |
| **6**                    | $62,940                                                       | $78,690    | $72,390    |
| **7**                    | $71,010                                                       | $88,785    | $81,675    |
| **8**                    | $79,080                                                       | $98,880    | $90,960    |

 

For family units with more than eight members, add the following amount for each additional family member: $8,070 for the 48 contiguous states, the District of Columbia and outlying jurisdictions; $10,095 for Alaska; and $9,285 for Hawaii.

The term "low-income individual" means an individual whose family's taxable income for the preceding year did not exceed 150 percent of the poverty level amount.

The figures shown under family income represent amounts equal to 150 percent of the family income levels established by the Census Bureau for determining poverty status. The poverty guidelines were published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the Federal Register on January 17, 2024 and are effective as of January 11, 2024.

TRIO Home | Prior-Year Low-Income Levels
  Last Modified: 01/30/2024
#### 22.102 Federal and State labor requirements.
Order entered June 4, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01650
- CR JORGE RIZO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause N o. F12
- 51864
- T



### O RDER In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court
ap pointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this orde r, by electronic transmission, to the

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE