alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 1 of 34 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 2 of 34 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 3 of 34 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 4 of 34 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 5 of 34 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 6 of 34 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 7 of 34 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 8 of 34 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 9 of 34 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 10 of 34 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 11 of 34 PageID #:11
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 12 of 34 PageID #:12
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 13 of 34 PageID #:13
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 14 of 34 PageID #:14
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 15 of 34 PageID #:15
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 16 of 34 PageID #:16
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 17 of 34 PageID #:17
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 18 of 34 PageID #:18
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 19 of 34 PageID #:19
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 20 of 34 PageID #:20
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 21 of 34 PageID #:21
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 22 of 34 PageID #:22
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 23 of 34 PageID #:23
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 24 of 34 PageID #:24
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 25 of 34 PageID #:25
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 26 of 34 PageID #:26
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 27 of 34 PageID #:27
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 28 of 34 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 29 of 34 PageID #:29
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 30 of 34 PageID #:30
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 31 of 34 PageID #:31
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 32 of 34 PageID #:32
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 33 of 34 PageID #:33
Case: 1:12-cr-00386 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 34 of 34 PageID #:34
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsNOAA Tech Memo NMFS NWFSC-8: Contaminant Exposure in Juvenile Salmon (cont): Figure 1 
Table of Contents
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Larry C. Miller, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Butler
Manufacturing Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
       ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
       of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
       Company




November 14, 2002                                    /s/ Larry C. Miller
-----------------                                    ---------------------------
Dated                                                Larry C. Miller
                                                     Vice President - Finance,
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
#### 225.7306 Offset arrangements.

In accordance with the Presidential policy statement of April 16, 1990, DoD does not encourage, enter into, or commit U.S. firms to FMS offset arrangements. The decision whether to engage in offsets, and the responsibility for negotiating and implementing offset arrangements, resides with the companies involved. (Also see 225.7303-2(a)(3).)

[70 FR 73155, Dec. 9, 2005]
#### 2143.101 Definitions.

The effective date of a FEGLI contract modification is as defined in FAR 43.101, except to the extent that the definition conflicts with LIFAR 2101.370.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Mininni, Appellant.

Motion by defendant to dispense with printing on his appeal from an order of the County Court, W'estehester County entered May 4, 1964, denying without a hearing his *corc.m nobis*application to vacate the judgment of said court, rendered December 26, 1950 after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree and of felonious possession of burglars’ tools, and sentencing him as a fourth felony offender to serve a term of 20 years to life. This motion and defendant’s appeal from *812• the said order of May 4, 1964 are dismissed in view of the granting of defendant’s prior motion to reverse the said 1950 judgment of conviction by reason of the destruction of the stenographer’s minutes (see *People*v. *Mininni,*21 A D 2d 811). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### 222.604 Exemptions.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 57 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE DOCUMENT AUTHORIZED.

    (a) In General.--A commemorative document in memory of the late 
President of the United States, George Herbert Walker Bush, shall be 
printed as a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding, 
under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    (b) Contents.--The document shall consist of the eulogies and 
encomiums for George Herbert Walker Bush, as expressed in the Senate 
and the House of Representatives, together with the texts of each of 
the following:
            (1) The state funeral ceremony at the United States Capitol 
        Rotunda.
            (2) The national funeral service held at the Washington 
        National Cathedral, Washington, District of Columbia.
            (3) The memorial service held at St. Martin's Episcopal 
        Church, Houston, Texas.
            (4) The interment ceremony at the George Herbert Walker 
        Bush Presidential Library Center, College Station, Texas.

SEC. 2. PRINTING OF DOCUMENT.

    In addition to the usual number of copies printed, there shall be 
printed the lesser of--
            (1) 32,500 copies of the commemorative document, of which 
        22,150 copies shall be for the use of the House of 
        Representatives and 10,350 copies shall be for the use of the 
        Senate; or
            (2) such number of copies of the commemorative document 
        that does not exceed a production and printing cost of 
        $1,000,000, with distribution of the copies to be allocated in 
        the same proportion as described in paragraph (1).

            Passed the Senate December 4, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the printing of a commemorative document in memory of the 
    late President of the United States, George Herbert Walker Bush.
```
MICHAEL TOPP, DUNCAN THOMASSON, MARTIN KOOYMAN, and BLACK

PEARL ENTERPRISES, LLC v. BIG ROCK FOUNDATION, INC.; CRYSTAL COAST TOURNAMENT, INC.; CARNIVORE CHARTERS, LLC; EDWARD PETRILLI; JAMIE WILLIAMS; TONY R. ROSS, and JOHN DOE No. 279 A1 2 ( F iled 25 J anuary 2013 )

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 726 S.E.2d 884 (2012), affirming an order transferring venue entered on 27 August 2010 by Judge J. Carlton Cole in Superior Court, Dare County, and an order granting summary judgment entered on 14 March 2011 by Judge John E. Nobles, Jr. in Superior Court, Carteret Count y. On 23 August 2012 , the Supreme Court allowed plaintiffs’ petition for discretionary review of additional issues. Hear d in the Supreme Court on 8 January 2013

. Gay, Jackson & McNally, L.L.P., by Andy W. Gay and Darren G. Jackson, for plaintiff

- appell ants

. Ward and Smith, P.A., by E. Bradley Evans, f or defendant

- appellees Big Rock Foundation, Inc. and Crystal Coast Tournament, Inc. Wheatly, Wheatly, Weeks, Lupton & Massie, P.A., by Claud R. Wheatly, III and Chadwick I. McCullen, for defendant

- appellee s Carnivore Charters, LLC, Edward Petrilli, Jamie Williams, and Tony R. Ross.

PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court , Carteret County for additional proceedings notT OPP V
. B IG R OCK F OUND ., I NC
. Opinion of the Court

- 2

- inconsistent with thi s opinion. Discretionary review was improvidently allowed as to the additional issue s .

REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         556,000                 121,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,000                 445,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,240,000               1,398,000
<PP&E>                                      35,614,000              32,354,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,000                  17,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,886,000              34,324,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,768,000               1,685,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,025,000               4,850,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,883,000              27,579,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,886,000              34,324,000
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               857,000                 450,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,269,000               1,636,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,060,000                 690,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167,000                  63,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,639,000)             (1,939,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,639,000)             (1,939,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,639,000)             (1,939,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.86)                  (2.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.86)                  (2.36)



</TABLE>
#### 216.102 Policies.

In accordance with section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Pub. L. 112-239), use of any cost-reimbursement line item for the acquisition of production of major defense acquisition programs is prohibited, unless the exception at 234.004(2)(ii) applies.

[87 FR 65513, Oct. 28, 2022]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with thefiling of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007(the “Report”) by Aspyra, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifiesthat to her knowledge:

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: March 31, 2008
| /s/ Anahita Villafane                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Anahita Villafane, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Aspyra, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
22.1504 Violations and remedies. ( a ) *Violations.* The Government may impose remedies set forth in paragraph (b) of this section for the following violations (note that the violations in paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4) of this section go beyond violations of the requirements relating to certification of end products) (see 22.1503): ( 1 ) The contractor has submitted a false certification regarding knowledge of the use of forced or indentured child labor.
( 2 ) The contractor has failed to cooperate as required in accordance with the clause at 52.222-19, Child Labor Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies, with an investigation of the use of forced or indentured child labor by an Inspector General, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of the Treasury.
( 3 ) The contractor uses forced or indentured child labor in its mining, production, or manufacturing processes.
( 4 ) The contractor has furnished an end product or component mined, produced, or manufactured, wholly or in part, by forced or indentured child labor. Remedies in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section are inappropriate unless the contractor knew of the violation.
( b ) *Remedies.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer may terminate the contract.
( 2 ) The suspending official may suspend the contractor in accordance with the procedures in subpart 9.4.
( 3 ) The debarring official may debar the contractor for a period not to exceed 3 years in accordance with the procedures in subpart 9.4.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. and its 
continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on January 28, 2021.

PLACE: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, (This meeting will be a 
virtual meeting).

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
30109.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-01573 Filed 1-19-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
1815.606-70 Relationship of unsolicited proposals to NRAs. An unsolicited proposal for a new effort or a renewal, identified by an evaluating office as being within the scope of an open NRA, shall be evaluated as a response to that NRA (see 1835.016-71), provided that the evaluating office can either: ( a ) State that the proposal is not at a competitive disadvantage, or
( b ) Give the offeror an opportunity to amend the unsolicited proposal to ensure compliance with the applicable NRA proposal preparation instructions. If these conditions cannot be met, the proposal must be evaluated separately.
[63 FR 9954, Feb. 27, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 48561, Sept. 7, 1999]
#### 2452.251-70 Contractor employee travel.

As prescribed in 2451.7001, insert the following clause in all cost-reimbursement solicitations and contracts involving travel:

# Contractor Employee Travel (OCT 1999)

(a) To the maximum extent practical, the Contractor shall make use of travel discounts which are available to Federal employees while traveling in the conduct of official Government business. Such discounts may include, but are not limited to, lodging and rental car rates.

(b) The Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining and/or providing to his/her employees written evidence of their status with regard to their performance of Government contract work needed to obtain such discounts.

(End of clause)

[64 FR 46101, Aug. 23, 1999]
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert J. Davis, the Chief Financial Officer of Liberator Medical Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2.           The information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 12, 2011
/s/ Robert J. DavisRobert J. Davis,Chief Financial Officer
Appeal No. 75-29.

#### Augusto Ambrosino *v.*Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board *et al.*

*Giovanni Folcarelli,*for plaintiff. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for defendant.

No cause having been shown in response to the order of Court on February 21, 1975, the appeal of the plaintiff is dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 18, 2012

p0411 

# Order

April 18, 2012

144169

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144169 COA: 297692 Wayne CC: 09-027558-FC MICHAEL EUGENE CHILDS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered . With regard to th e defendant’s Issue I, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granti ng leave to appeal, we AFFIRM the result reached by the Court of Appeal s, but VACATE that part of the Court of Ap peals opinion holding that the autopsy report was not testim onial and, therefore, that its admission did

not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment ri ght to be confronted with the witnesses against him. In particular, we disagr ee with the Court of Appeals reliance on MRE 803(8) and its determination that th e autopsy report wa s not prepared in anticipation of litigation, see Bullcoming v New Mexico , 564 US __; 131 S Ct 2705; 180 L Ed 2d 610 (2011). Nonethel ess, we agree that the defend ant is not entitled to relief. Defense counsel stipulated to the admissi on of the autopsy report. Even assuming, arguendo, that there is merit in the defendant ’s claim that his counsel was ineffective in this regard, the Court of Appe als correctly held that the admission of the report was not outcome determinative. In all other respects , leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaini ng questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company and its
subsidiaries.
 /s/ Michael H. Goldberg

Michael H. GoldbergPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)November 2, 2007/s/ Lawrence A. BoikLawrence A. BoikVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)November 2, 2007
Opinion issued October 25 , 201 2

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 12
- 00282
- CV

——————————— W.A.G. CONSTRUCTION, INC. , Appellant

V. MARK HATCHER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. 2010
- 62355

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , W.A.G. Construction, Inc. , has filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.1 (a), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has
issued. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(c ).2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justice s Bland and Huddle

.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table 7. Concentrations of butyltins in composite liver samples of juvenile chinook salmon in 1989. 

a The "less than" symbol (<) indicates that the analyte was not detected in concentrations above the stated value.

b The analyte was detected, but below the limit of quatification of 25 ng/g. 

Table of Contents
Defining and Assessing
Learning:

Exploring
Competency-
ae ¢

Initiatives

S

A Report of the Lo
National Postsecondary Le

Education Cooperative


Prepared by:

Elizabeth A.

Jones
consultant

and

Richard A,
Voorhees

working group chair

with

Karen Paulson
consultant

and the
Competency-
Based
Initiatives
Working Group

Announcing the release of the report,
Defining and Assessing Learning:

Exploring Competency-Based Initiatives.

This report explores competency-based models in postsecondary
institutions and in other learning environments. The report is intended
primarily as a guide for postsecondary educators who are interested in
establishing such efforts at their institutions.

a)}—_—_—_—_—_——

()-—_———______<§£_
G)>————_————JX


& NPEC The National Postsecondary Education

Cooperative is a voluntary partnership of postsecondary
institutions, associations, agencies, and organizations.
NPEC's mission is to promote the quality, comparability, and
utility of postsecondary data and information that support
policy development at the national, state, and institutional
levels. NPEC is funded by the National Center for
Education Statistics (NCES), U.S. Department of Education.

—_—_©

—____—_©

To download
acopy of

this report,
please visit our
Web site at

tip: !/nces.ed, gow pubs 2002/20N02159 pdf

To order this report,
please write:
US Department of Education
ED Pubs
PO Bax 1398
Jessup, MD 20794-1398
or call toll free:
1-877-4ED-PUBS