alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
^ * 

### •••FFARTMBN TO F •hAN3P0RiAl!0 N •:CC^L T

### OPERATION S 

## SERVE D AUGUS T 1 0 201 1 '^^^ ^ ^ ^ ' ' ^ ^' ^ ^

Uv S DEPARTMENl ^ O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I N TH E MATTERO F 

# FEDERA L EXPRES S CORPORATIO N FA A DOCKE T No
. CP10NM000 6 (Civi l Pciiiilly Action ) DM S FAA-2 n 10-079 0


### I N TH E MATTERO F 

## EMPIR E AIRLINES , INC
. FA A DOCKE T No
. CPI0NM000 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S FAA-2010-079 1 

## ORDE RDENYIN GMOTIO N I N LIMIN E Complainan t

Federal Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant") , o n Augus t 9 , 2011 , filedaMotio n i

n Limin e ("Motion")
. I

t request s tha

t tw o of Respondents ' intende d witnesse s b e preclude dfromtestifyin g becaus e th e witnesses ' propose dtestimon y wil l prov e irrelevan t

or immaterial , o r

becaus e th e natur e of

th e propose dte;stimon

y i s currentl y unknown
. I

n th e alternative , th e Motio n ask s tha t any testimon y b e limite d"t o th e fact s surroundin g (hi s case. "

### Complainanr s Motio n i s denie da s prcmauirc
. Arginiicn l cunccniiii g (he natur e

an dappropriatenes s o f

propose dtestimon y mus t await it s proffer

a t Ili e hearing
. S O ORDERED
. 

# Qjcl^

k c . GJ I ~= A
Altachmenl s ~ Servic e Lis t RichardC
. Goodwi n U.S
. Administrativ e La

w Judg eFA A Docke t Nos
. CP10NM000 6 &CP10NM000 7 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g -Suit e 2W1OOO '

ON E COP Y Davi dJ
. Bronczek , Presiden t Federa l Expres s Corporation , Respoiider U Deliver y Cod e 7622 , BId g G , 2'" * Floo r 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g 8,3^''Floo r Memphis , T N 3812 5 Cynthi aChandler-Snell , Respondent' s Counse l Federa l Expres s Corporatio n Regulator y Divisio n 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g 8,3'' ^ Floo r Memphis , T N 3812 5 TEL : 901-434-836 1 FAX : 901-434-828 3 Glenn P
. Wicks , Respondent' s Counse l Roncevcr t D
. Almon d Th e Wick s Group , PLLC 121 5 17" ^ Street , N

W Sumner Annex , Fourt

hFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 TEL : FAX : 202-457-779 0 202-457-779 9 Kyl e Lomazow , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , OfRc e o f

Regional Counse l Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Northwes t

Mountai n Region , ANM- 7 160 1 LindAvenue , S. W Rcnton , W

A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-184 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e RichardC
. Goodvvm , Administrativ e La

w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEI2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega

l Assistant FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , use th

e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Adininislralion , 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building -Suite 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 154 

Promoting awareness of motorcycle profiling and encouraging collaboration 

and communication with the motorcycle community and law enforcement 

officials to prevent instances of profiling. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself and Mrs. SHAHEEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Promoting awareness of motorcycle profiling and encouraging 

collaboration and communication with the motorcycle 

community and law enforcement officials to prevent instances of profiling. 

Whereas motorcycle ridership has continued to increase over 

time with registrations growing from 3,826,373 in 1997 

to 8,600,936 in 2015; 

Whereas, as of August 2016, the ongoing National Motorcycle Profiling Survey 2016, conducted by the Motorcycle 

Profiling Project, found that approximately 1⁄2 of the motorcyclists surveyed felt that they had been profiled by 

law enforcement at least once; 

Whereas motorcycle profiling means the illegal use of the fact 

that a person rides a motorcycle or wears motorcycle reVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:26 May 04, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR154.IS SR154

SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 154 IS 

lated apparel as a factor in deciding to stop and question, 

take enforcement action, arrest, or search a person or vehicle with or without legal basis under the Constitution 

of the United States; 

Whereas complaints surrounding motorcycle profiling have 

been cited in all 50 States; 

Whereas nationwide protests to raise awareness and combat 

motorcycle profiling have been held in multiple States; 

Whereas in 2011, Washington signed into law legislation 

stating that the criminal justice training commission 

shall ensure that issues related to motorcycle profiling 

are addressed in basic law enforcement training and offered to in-service law enforcement officers in conjunction 

with existing training regarding profiling; 

Whereas reported incidents of motorcycle profiling have 

dropped approximately 90 percent in the State of Washington since the 2011 legislation was signed into law; and 

Whereas in the spring of 2016, Maryland became the second 

State to pass a law addressing the issue of motorcycle 

profiling: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) promotes increased public awareness on the 

3 issue of motorcycle profiling; 

4 (2) encourages collaboration and communica5 tion with the motorcycle community and law enforce6 ment to engage in efforts to end motorcycle 

7 profiling; and 


SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 154 IS 

1 (3) urges State law enforcement officials to in2 clude statements condemning motorcycle profiling in 

3 written policies and training materials. 

Æ 


SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 2 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 3 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 4 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 5 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 6 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 7 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 8 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 9 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 10 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 11 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 12 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 13 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 14 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 15 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 16 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 17 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 18 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 19 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 20 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 21 of 22 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-05105 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 22 of 22 PageID #:4
**CERTIFICATION        OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

| 1. | I                  have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of SORL Auto Parts,                  Inc.;                  and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based                  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                  of a                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                  the                  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such                  statements                  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by                  this                  report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Xiao Ping ZhangXiao                  Ping ZhangChief                  Executive Officer and Chairman |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 99.3
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Modern Technology
corp. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, being Arthur Seidenfeld, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the Financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

    /s/ Arthur Seidenfeld

    Arthur Seidenfeld
    President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
    September 3, 2003
**Who May Apply: (by category)** Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) 

**Who May Apply: (specifically)**  Faculty members must apply through their employing institutions.

 A faculty member is eligible to receive a fellowship if he or she:

- Is a citizen or national of the United States or is a permanent resident of the United States.
- Is employed by an institution of higher education.
- Has been engaged in teaching relevant to his or her foreign language or area studies specialization for the two years immediately preceding the date of the award.
- Proposes research relevant to his or her modern foreign language or area studies specialization,which is not dissertation research for a doctoral degree. 
- Possesses sufficient foreign language skills to carry out the research project.

**Expenses Covered by the Award:**

- Travel expenses to and from the residence of the fellow and the country or countries of research.
- Maintenance stipend for the fellow related to his or her academic year salary.
- An allowance for research-related expenses overseas, such as books, copying, tuition and affiliation fees, local travel and other incidental expenses.

**Duration:**  3 - 12 months

A fellow shall:

- Maintain satisfactory progress in the conduct of his or her research.
- Devote full time to research on the approved topic.
- Not engage in unauthorized income-producing activities during the period of the fellowship.
- Remain employed by the grantee institution during the period of the fellowship.

IFLE Home  Last Modified: 03/07/2022
**Exhibit 31.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Baylor, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Camco Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of Camco as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. Camco’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d15(f))for Camco and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Camco, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of Camco’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluations; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in Camco’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Camco’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Camco’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.5. Camco’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Camco’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Camco’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: May 4, 2006 By:  /s/ Richard C. Baylor   Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky Morgan, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 691]—

Peters, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Ledina, J.), rendered August 19, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted rape in the first degree and rape in the second degree.

In June 2004, defendant was charged with four counts each of rape in the first degree and rape in the second degree arising out of his conduct with a 13-year-old child. From the time of his arraignment through his plea, defendant was represented by three separate attorneys. Within days of the entry of his plea to one count each of attempted rape in the first degree and rape in the second degree, defendant sought to withdraw it. County Court denied his request and thereafter sentenced him in accordance with the plea agreement.

On appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency and voluntariness of his plea, the adequacy of his counsel and a denial of his statutory right to a speedy trial *(see*CPL 30.30 [1] [a]).

Defendant waived his right to appeal both orally and in writing. Before accepting the plea, County Court meticulously articulated the distinction between the rights he would be relinquishing when he waived his right to appeal and those other rights which would be automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; *People v Nason,*31 AD3d 818, 819 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 869 [2006]; *compare People v Cain,*29 AD3d 1157, 1157 [2006]). County Court also inquired about the written waiver executed by defendant to ensure that he fully reviewed it with his attorney and signed it only after having been apprised of its consequences. These facts demonstrate that there was a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of defendant’s right to appeal, thereby constituting a relinquishment of the claims now proffered concerning a deprivation of his statutory right to a speedy trial and the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution *(see People v Missimer,*32 AD3d 1114, 1115 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 927 [2006]).

*890Defendant’s valid waiver of appeal also precludes any challenge regarding the effectiveness of counsel, except as it relates to the voluntariness of his plea. To the extent that this claim survives the waiver, it had to be preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v De Berardinis,*304 AD2d 914, 915 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 580 [2003]). Since defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea did not contain a claim concerning counsel, it is not preserved for our review. Had it been properly asserted, we would have found it meritless. To the extent that defendant’s claim of duress was properly asserted, we agree with County Court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea on this basis.

Crew III, J.E, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
#### 252.226-7002 Representation for Demonstration Project for Contractors Employing Persons with Disabilities.

As prescribed in 226.7203, use the following provision:

# Representation for Demonstration Project for Contractors Employing Persons With Disabilities (DEC 2019)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this provision—

*Eligible contractor* means a business entity operated on a for-profit or nonprofit basis that—

(1) Employs severely disabled individuals at a rate that averages not less than 33 percent of its total workforce over the 12-month period prior to issuance of the solicitation;

(2) Pays not less than the minimum wage prescribed pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 206 to the employees who are severely disabled individuals; and

(3) Provides, for its employees, health insurance and a retirement plan comparable to those provided for employees by business entities of similar size in its industrial sector or geographic region.

*Severely disabled individual* means an individual with a disability (as defined in 42 U.S.C. 12102) who has a severe physical or mental impairment that seriously limits one or more functional capacities.

(b) *Demonstration Project.* This solicitation is issued pursuant to the Demonstration Project for Contractors Employing Persons with Disabilities. The purpose of the Demonstration Project is to provide defense contracting opportunities for entities that employ severely disabled individuals. To be eligible for award, an offeror must be an eligible contractor as defined in paragraph (a) of this provision.

(c) *Representation.* The offeror represents that it [] is [] is not an eligible contractor as defined in paragraph (a) of this provision.

(End of provision)

[84 FR 72561, Dec. 31, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                       453
<INVENTORY>                                     36,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,915
<PP&E>                                         241,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,132
<BONDS>                                         81,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,107
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,285
<SALES>                                        257,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               257,236
<CGS>                                          213,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (105)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,265)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (457)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (4,996)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,804)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)
        

</TABLE>
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 68 

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed export to the Government of 

Egypt of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2018 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed export to the 

Government of Egypt of certain defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of a letter of offer with respect to any 

4 of the following proposed exports to the Government of 

5 Egypt (described in the certification Transmittal No. 18– 

6 47, sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives 

7 and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations 

8 of the Senate pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms 

9 Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)) on November 

10 28, 2018), is hereby prohibited: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SJ 68 IS 

1 (1) The proposed sale of 46,000 120MM Target 

2 Practice—Tracer (M831A1) and 120MM Target 

3 Practice, Cone Stabilized, Discarding Sabot— 

4 (M865) rounds (Transmittal Numbered 18–47). 

5 (2) The proposed sale of 10,000 120MM 4th6 Generation Kinetic Energy-Tungsten (KE–W) A4 

7 Armor-Piercing Fin-Stabilized Discarding Sabot 

8 with Tracer (APFSDS–T) rounds (Transmittal 

9 Numbered 18–47). 

10 (3) The proposed sale of 4,500 120MM Insensi11 tive Munitions High Explosive with Tracer (IM HE– 

12 T) tank rounds, field implementation, testing inspec13 tions, spares and repair parts, support and test 

14 equipment, field support publications and technical 

15 data, U.S. government and contractor engineering 

16 and logistics support services, personnel training and 

17 training equipment, quality assurance team support 

18 services, preparation of ammunition for shipment, 

19 ammunition delivery, component improvement pro20 gram and repair, other associated equipment and 

21 support, and other related elements of logistical and 

22 program support (Transmittal Numbered 18–47). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS