alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016385EN.01000302.xml

| 19.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8197 — Cinven/Old Mutual Wealth Italy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 385/06)

On 10 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8197. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8197. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

Nebraska Department of Education500 South 84th Street2nd FloorLincoln, NE 68510-2611Phone: (402) 471-2295Fax: 402-471-4433Website: http://www.education.ne.gov

### State Higher Education Agency

Coordinating Commission for Postsecondary EducationP.O. BOX 905005Lincoln, NE 68509-5005Phone: (402) 471-2847Fax: (402) 471-2886Website: https://ccpe.nebraska.gov/

### Special Education Agency

Office of Special EducationNebraska State Department of Education500 South 84th Street2nd FloorLincoln, NE 68510-2611Phone: (402) 471-2471Fax: (402) 742-1160Website: http://www.education.ne.gov/sped/index.html

### State Adult Education Agency

Adult Education Nebraska Department of Education 500 South 84th Street2nd FloorLincoln, NE 68510-2611Phone: (308) 398-7446Website: http://www.education.ne.gov/ADED/index.html

Back to state map
232.302 Authority. ( a ) The use of guaranteed loans as a contract financing mechanism requires the availability of certain congressional authority. The DoD has not requested such authority in recent years, and none is now available.
# C_2016398EN.01000202.xml

| 28.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8162 — Daimler/Athlon Car Lease International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 398/04)

On 24 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8162. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8162. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2



Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



I, Randy L. Denecky, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. (the registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

(intentionally omitted pursuant to the guidance contained in SEC Release No. 33  8238)



(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 10, 2004



by /s/ Randy L. Denecky



Randy L. Denecky

Chief Financial Officer
### OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

May 26, 2011

Dear Colleague:

As the use of emerging technologies in the classroom increases, schools at  all levels must ensure equal access to the educational benefits and opportunities  afforded by the technology and equal treatment in the use of the technology  for all students, including students with disabilities.  To assist you in this  regard, I write to share the attached “Frequently Asked Questions About the  June 29, 2010, Dear Colleague Letter” (FAQ), developed by the U.S. Department  of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).  This FAQ is a follow-up to a  Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) that we sent to college and university presidents  on June 29, 2010, regarding the use of electronic book readers and other emerging  technologies in educational settings.  The legal requirements that are articulated  in the June 2010 DCL, which are reiterated in the attached FAQ, also applyto elementary and secondary schools.  

  The June 2010 DCL outlines concerns of the U.S. Department of Education and  the U.S. Department of Justice that arose in the context of reviewing several  complaints regarding compliance with long-standing requirements of civil rights  law.  In those cases, postsecondary educational institutions were using electronic  book readers that were inaccessible to students who are blind or have low vision.   The DCL explains that under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and  Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, educational institutions cannot  require the use of electronic book readers in a classroom setting if the readers  are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, including individuals  who are blind or have low vision, unless those individuals are provided accommodations  or modifications that permit them to receive all the educational benefits provided  by the technology in an equally effective and equally integrated manner.  

  The June 2010 DCL generated interest from educational institutions, students,  parents, advocacy organizations, and others.  OCR is releasing this FAQ in  order to provide more information about the obligations of schools (both elementary  and secondary schools and postsecondary institutions) that provide benefits to students by means of electronic  book readers or other emerging technologies.  Please share this FAQ with your  administrators, faculty, and staff.  

  For more information, the June 2010 DCL is available at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-20100629.html,  and the FAQ is available at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-ebook-faq-201105.html.

|   | Sincerely,                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/                                          |   |
|   | Russlynn Ali                                 |
|   | Assistant Secretary        for  Civil Rights |

Attachment
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)
                                ---------------


                        OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

                    [PFL Life Insurance Company Letterhead]
April 10, 2000


PFL Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa  52499-0001

Re:  PFL Retirement Builder Variable Annuity Account Registration on Form N-4
     SEC File No. 333-61063

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the PFL Immediate Income Annuity policies are
those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)  the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the Policies,

(2)  the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the policies,

(3)  the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and management
     of the Policies and that provides for a reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed include:

(i)  Separate Account Charge

(ii) Taxes (including Premium and other Taxes if applicable)

The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (ii)
is established in the pricing of the PFL Immediate Income Annuity, to achieve a
reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of industry
practice with respect to comparable variable immediate annuity products.
<PAGE>

PFL Life Insurance Company
Page 2
April 10, 2000


Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred. Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges. In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
Policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the Policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the Registration Statement.



/s/ Roger Freeman
-----------------------------------
Roger Freeman, MAAA
Vice President
PFL Life Insurance Company
### TIER -~TTO)RNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSSTIN. TJCXAS**  %3?11
May 31, 1977

The Honorable Ann L. Postma County Attorney Childress County P. 0. Box 589 Childress, Texas 79201 Opinion No. H-1005 Re: Maintenance and destruction of hospital district records. DearMs. Postma: You have requested our opinion concerning themedical and financial records of ahospital district. Your questions may be paraphrased as follows: 1. Whether the records of Childress County Hospital District are public records. 2. Whether the records of Childress County Hospital District may be destroyed or disposed of pursuant to article 6574b, § 4, V.T.C.S. Article 657433,V.T.C.S., provides for theduplication and destruction of "public records" by the "governing body of any political subdivision of Texas." A hospital district is such apolitical subdivision. Bexar Counx Hospital District v. Cro*,, 327 S.W.2d 445 (Tex.1959),Attorney General Opinions M-510 (1969);WW-886 (1960). A "public record" has been defined as:

awritten memorial made by apublic officer authorized by law toperform that function and intended to serve as something written, said, or done. Nogueira v State,

. 59S.W.2d 831, 832 (Tex.Crim. App. 1933); Attorney General Opinion M-1240 (1972). In our view the medical and financial records of ahospital district would generally come within this definition. Of course, a "public record" under article 657413isnot necessarily a "public

P. 4161The Honorable Ann L. Postma -page 2 (H-1005)

record" under the Open Records Act, V.T.C.S. art. 6252-17a, and nothing in this opinion is intended to address the access of the public toany particular-records maintained by a hospital district. Since~the records of ahospital district arewithin the operation of article 6574b, inour opinion such~recordsmay be duplicated and destroyed pursuant to itsprovisions. Records may be destroyed only after duplication and only after such records are at least fiveyears old and after notice has been given to the State Librarian. V.T.C.S. art. 6574b, S 4; Attorney General Opinion H-852 (1976). SUMMARY Article 6574b,V.T.C.S., provides theprocedure for the duplication and destruction of records of ahospital district.

APPROVED:

c. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee km1

p. 4162
');
	document.write('

On April 1, 2016, the supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was published in the Federal Register to allow the Department to collect more public comments specifically on distance education as it relates to teacher preparation.  This page also provides a link for providing public comment.  All public comment must be submitted by May 2, 2016 at 12:00 a.m. EST.

Note:  The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register.

**Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Unofficial Version) - November 25, 2014**:  The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register.  This document has been sent to the Office of the Federal Register but has not yet been scheduled for publication. download filesMS Word

Federal Register Notice dated October 26, 2011:  Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, Negotiator Nominations and Schedule of Committee Meetings-Teacher Preparation and TEACH Grant Programs | download filesPDF

Electronic Announcement regarding Federal Register Notice dated October 26, 2011

**Session One:  January 18-19, 2012**

- Agenda:  download filesMS Word (39K) | PDF (209K)
- List of Negotiators: download filesMS Word (56K) | PDF (279K)
- Organizational Protocols:  download filesMS Word (56K) | PDF (198K)
- Issue Summaries:  download filesMS Word (156K) | PDF (447K)

**Session Two:  February 27-29, 2012**

- Agenda:  download filesMS Word (45K) | PDF (282K)
- Meeting Summary: download filesMS Word (69K) | PDF (284K)
- Issue Summaries:  download filesPDF (579K)
- Draft Language – Regulations, Part 686:  download filesPDF (121K)
- Draft Language – Regulations, Part 612:  download filesPDF (185K)
- Draft Institutional Report Card:  download filesPDF (178K) | With tracked changes:  download filesPDF (222K)
- Draft State Report Card:  download filesPDF (220K) | With tracked changes:  download filesPDF (350K)

**Session Three:  April 3-5, 2012**

- Agenda:  download filesMS Word (49K) | PDF (286K)
- Meeting Summary: download filesMS Word (67K) | PDF (277K)
- Issue Summaries:  download filesMS Word (182K) | PDF (580K)
- Amendatory Language:  download filesMS Word (35K) | PDF (195K)
- Draft Language – Regulations, Part 612:  download filesMS Word (87K) | PDF (199K) | With Tracked Changes: download filesMS Word (123K)
- Draft Language – Regulations, Part 686:  download filesMS Word (33K) | PDF (161K) | With Tracked Changes: download filesMS Word (137K)

**Update**

We have formally submitted a supplemental Notice of Proposed Rule Making to the Office of Management and Budget for review that will allow us to collect more public comments specifically on distance education as it relates to teacher preparation. Following the Office of Management and Budget review, we will publish the supplemental NPRM in the Federal Register for public comment.



Negotiated Rulemaking 2011 Page | OPE Policy Page
Case: 1:12-cr-00395 Document #: 67 Filed: 06/05/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:424
Case: 1:12-cr-00395 Document #: 67 Filed: 06/05/13 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:425
Case: 1:12-cr-00395 Document #: 67 Filed: 06/05/13 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:426
Case: 1:12-cr-00395 Document #: 67 Filed: 06/05/13 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:427
Case: 1:12-cr-00395 Document #: 67 Filed: 06/05/13 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:428
# C_2016402EN.01000101.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 402/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 392, 24.10.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 383, 17.10.2016

OJ C 371, 10.10.2016

OJ C 364, 3.10.2016

OJ C 350, 26.9.2016

OJ C 343, 19.9.2016

OJ C 335, 12.9.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
232.904 Determining payment due dates. ( d ) In most cases, Government acceptance or approval can occur within the 7-day constructive acceptance period specified in the FAR Prompt Payment clauses. Government payment of construction progress payments can, in most cases, be made within the 14-day period allowed by the Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts clause. While the contracting officer may specify a longer period because the period specified in the contract is not reasonable or practical, such change should be coordinated with the Government offices responsible for acceptance or approval and for payment. Reasons for specifying a longer period include but are not limited to: the nature of the work or supplies or services, inspection or testing requirements, shipping and acceptance terms, and resources available at the acceptance activity. A constructive acceptance period of less than the cited 7 or 14 days is not authorized.
[70 FR 75413, Dec. 20, 2005]
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 14 

Commending the Clemson University Tigers football team for winning the 

2017 College Football Playoff National Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. SCOTT) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Clemson University Tigers football team 

for winning the 2017 College Football Playoff National 

Championship. 

Whereas, on Monday, January 9, 2017, the Clemson University Tigers football team won the 2017 College Football 

Playoff National Championship (in this preamble referred 

to as the ‘‘championship game’’) by defeating the University of Alabama by a score of 35 to 31 at Raymond 

James Stadium in Tampa, Florida; 

Whereas the Tigers finished the championship game with 511 

yards of total offense; 

Whereas the victory by the Tigers in the championship 

game— 

(1) earned Clemson its first national title since the 

1981 season; and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 14 ATS 

(2) marked the first time that Clemson had beaten 

a top-ranked team; 

Whereas the head coach of Clemson, Dabo Swinney, has been 

an outstanding role model to the Clemson players and the 

Clemson community; 

Whereas Deshaun Watson gave the best performance by a 

quarterback in a championship game; 

Whereas Ben Boulware, from Anderson, South Carolina, was 

named the defensive Most Valuable Player of the championship game; 

Whereas Hunter Renfrow, a graduate of Socastee High 

School, went from being a walk-on player to catching the 

winning touchdown in the championship game; 

Whereas the Clemson University football team displayed outstanding dedication, teamwork, and sportsmanship 

throughout the 2016 collegiate football season in achieving the highest honor in college football; and 

Whereas the Tigers have brought pride and honor to the 

State of South Carolina: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Clemson University Tigers 

3 for winning the 2017 College Football Playoff Na4 tional Championship; 

5 (2) recognizes the on-field and off-field achieve6 ments of the players, coaches, and staff of the 

7 Clemson football team; and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 14 ATS 

1 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

2 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu3 tion to— 

4 (A) the President of Clemson University, 

5 James P. Clements; and 

6 (B) the head coach of the Clemson Univer7 sity football team, Dabo Swinney. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### 223.7306 Contract clause.

Unless an exception in 223.7304 applies, or use has been authorized in accordance with 223.7305, use the clause at 252.223-7008, Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that are for supplies, maintenance and repair services, or construction.

[76 FR 25575, May 5, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 37986, June 25, 2013; 88 FR 6583, Jan. 31, 2023]