alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

GLAZIERS, ARCHITECTURAL METAL ) 

AND GLASS WORKERS LOCAL ) 

UNION NO. 27 WELFARE AND ) 

PENSION FUNDS, ) No. 12 CV 4545 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Judge Castillo 

 ) 

 v. ) Magistrate Judge Cole 

 ) 

INNOVATIVE METAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, ) 

a Michigan limited liability company, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN SUM CERTAIN

 NOW COME the Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, DONALD D. SCHWARTZ, 

ANDREW S. PIGOTT and ARNOLD AND KADJAN, and in their Motion for Judgment 

in Sum Certain, state as follows: 

 1. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint against Defendant on June 12, 2012 based 

on ERISA fringe benefit contribution audit findings in excess of $500,000.00. 

 2. Subsequent to the filing of the Complaint, Defendant challenged the audit 

findings. 

 3. Plaintiffs accepted Defendant’s challenges. 

 4. According to the affidavit of Richard J. Wolf, Plaintiffs’ auditor, 

Defendant presently owes the Plaintiffs $1,175.30 in delinquent contributions, liquidated 

damages, prior late payment assessments and discrepancies, and audit costs. See Ex. A. 

 5. Per the affidavit of Plaintiffs’ counsel, Andrew S. Pigott, Plaintiffs have 

incurred $5,400.00 in the prosecution of this action so far. See Ex. B. 

Case: 1:12-cv-04545 Document #: 11 Filed: 08/30/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:24
 6. On August 13, 2012, the Court sua sponte entered a default against 

Defendant. 

 7. Defendant has still failed to appear and defend in this litigation. 

 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs ask this Court to enter the order attached to this Motion 

as Exhibit C. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 TRUSTEES OF THE GLAZIERS, 

 ARCHIECTURAL METAL AND 

 GLASS WORKERS LOCAL UNION 

 NO. 27 WELFARE AND 

 PENSION FUNDS 

 By: s/Andrew S. Pigott 

One of their Attorneys 

Donald D. Schwartz 

Andrew S. Pigott 

ARNOLD AND KADJAN 

203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1650 

Chicago, Illinois 60601 

(312) 236-0415 

Case: 1:12-cv-04545 Document #: 11 Filed: 08/30/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:25
Opinion issued January 14, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00889-CR

NO. 01-13-00890-CR

———————————

MARLIN RAY MCDOWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1366053, 1366054

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Marlin Ray McDowell, pleaded guilty, without an agreed 

recommendation, to the felony offense of robbery. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN.

§ 29.02 (West 2011). On January 28, 2013, the trial court found appellant guilty 
2

and sentenced him to twenty-five years’ confinement. On September 30, 2013, 

appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant did not file a motion for new trial or a motion for extension of 

time to file his notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2), 26.3(b); Olivo v. 

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (requiring both notice of 

appeal and motion for extension to be filed within 15 days of original due date for 

notice of appeal). Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on or before

February 27, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1).

A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction. See Slaton 

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). The Court of Criminal 

Appeals has expressly held that without a timely filed notice of appeal we cannot 

exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; see also 

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. Because appellant’s September 30, 2013 notice of 

appeal was untimely, we have no basis for jurisdiction over this appeal. See

Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all 

pending motions as moot.
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
#### BIESEITHAL v. WISE. In re WISE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Depart ment.

March 9, 1906.)

Appeal from Specia Term, New York County. Action by Isaac Biesenthal against Benjamin Wise. From ai order substituting certain attorneys as attor neys for defendant in the place of Leon Kron feld and another, they appeal. Modified.

Rob ert J. Robeson, for appellants.

Emanuel Yai Dernoot, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed iron should be modified by striking out the seeonc provision thereof, providing that the paymenof the $75 specified shall be in full for al services rendered in the action, and substituí ing in place thereof a provision that appellant.1 Kronfeld and Harris be permitted to receive the $75 directed to be paid without prejudice tc the bringing of any action by them against the defendant, Wise, to recover further compen sation for the services rendered to him, if the; shall be so advised. As so modified, the ordei should be affirmed, without costs to eithei party.
#### 227.671 General.

In furtherance of the Military Assistance Program or for other national defense purposes, the Government may undertake to develop or encourage the development of foreign additional sources of supply. The development of such sources may be accomplished by an agreement, often called a foreign licensing agreement or technical assistance agreement, wherein a domestic concern, referred to in this subpart as a “primary source,” agrees to furnish to a foreign concern or government, herein referred to as a “second source;” foreign patent rights; technical assistance in the form of data, know-how, trained personnel of the primary source, instruction and guidance of the personnel of the second source, jigs, dies, fixtures, or other manufacturing aids, or such other assistance, information, rights, or licenses as are needed to enable the second source to produce particular supplies or perform particular services. Agreements calling for one or more of the foregoing may be entered into between the primary source and the Government, a foreign government, or a foreign concern. The consideration for providing such foreign license and technical assistance may be in the form of a lump sum payment, payments for each item manufactured by the second source, an agreement to exchange data and patent rights on improvements made to the article or service, capital stock transactions, or any combination of these. The primary source's bases for computing such consideration may include actual costs; charges for the use of patents, data, or know-how reflecting the primary source's investment in developing and engineering and production techniques; and the primary source's “price” for setting up a second source. Such agreements often refer to the compensation to be paid as a royalty or license fee whether or not patent rights are involved.
#### 252.204-7022 Expediting Contract Closeout.

As prescribed in 204.804-70, use the following clause:

# Expediting Contract Closeout (MAY 2021)

(a) At the conclusion of all applicable closeout requirements of Federal Acquisition Regulation 4.804, the Government and Contractor shall mutually agree on the residual dollar amount remaining on the contract. Both the Government and Contractor agree to waive payment of any residual dollar amount of $1,000 or less to which either party may be entitled at the time of contract closeout.

(b) A residual dollar amount includes all money owed to either party at the end of the contract and as a result of the contract, excluding amounts connected in any way with taxation or a violation of law or regulation.

(c) For purposes of determining residual dollar amounts, offsets (e.g., across multiple contracts or orders) may be considered only to the extent permitted by law.

(End of clause)

[86 FR 27277, May 20, 2021]
239.7411 Contract clauses. ( a ) In addition to other appropriate FAR and DFARS clauses, use the following clauses in solicitations, contracts, and basic agreements for telecommunications services. Modify the clauses only if necessary to meet the requirements of a governmental regulatory agency. ( 1 ) 252.239-7002, Access.
( 2 ) 252.239-7004, Orders for Facilities and Services.
( 3 ) 252.239-7007, Cancellation or Termination of Orders.
( b ) Use the following clauses in solicitations, contracts, and basic agreements for telecommunications services when the acquisition includes or may include special construction. Modify the clauses only if necessary to meet the requirements of a governmental regulatory agency— ( 1 ) 252.239-7011, Special Construction and Equipment Charges; and
( 2 ) 252.239-7012, Title to Telecommunication Facilities and Equipment.
( c ) Use the basic or alternate of the clause at 252.239-7013, Term of Agreement and Continuation of Services, in basic agreements for telecommunications services. ( 1 ) Use the basic clause in basic agreements that do not supersede an existing basic agreement with the contractor.
( 2 ) Use the alternate I clause in basic agreements that supersede an existing basic agreement with the contractor. Complete paragraph (c)(1) of the clause with the basic agreement number, date, and contacting office that issued the basic agreement being superseded.
( d ) Use the clause at 252.239-7016, Telecommunications Security Equipment, Devices, Techniques, and Services, in solicitations and contracts when performance of a contract requires secure telecommunications.
[56 FR 36429, July 31, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 42632, Sept. 15, 1992; 62 FR 40473, July 29, 1997; 70 FR 67919, Nov. 9, 2005; 71 FR 39011, July 11, 2006; 84 FR 48497, 48498, Sept. 13, 2019; 84 FR 58338, Oct. 31, 2019; 86 FR 3837, Jan. 15, 2021]
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending
February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony R. Maresca, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony R. MarescaAnthony R. MarescaChief Financial OfficerOctober 15, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF BANCTEC, INC.
 
BancTec USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
BancTec (Management), Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
BancTec (Export), Inc., a Virgin Islands corporation.
 
BancTec (Puerto Rico), Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
BancTec (Canada), Inc., a Canadian corporation.
 
BancTec Limited, a U.K. corporation.
 
BancTec (Australia) Pty Limited, an Australian corporation.
 
BancTec Japan, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
BancTec Holding N.V., a Netherlands corporation
 
BancTec GmbH, a German corporation.
 
BancTec S.A., a French corporation.
 
BancTec B.V., a Netherlands corporation.
 
BancTec AB, a Swedish corporation.
 
BancTec Danmark A/S, a Danish corporation.
 
BancTec Iberica S.A., a Spanish corporation.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: July 9, 2007



By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer



















CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: July 9, 2007



By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer
243.204-70-1 Scope. ( a ) This subsection applies to unpriced change orders with an estimated value exceeding $5 million.
( b ) Unpriced change orders for foreign military sales and special access programs are not subject to this section, but the contracting officer shall apply the policy and procedures to them to the maximum extent practicable. If the contracting officer determines that it is impracticable to adhere to the policy and procedures of this section for an unpriced change order for a foreign military sale or a special access program, the contracting officer shall provide prior notice, through agency channels, to the Office of the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy (Contract Policy) via email at *osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-c-contractpolicy@mail.mil .*
[75 FR 48277, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 73237, Oct. 25, 2023; 89 FR 60832, July 29, 2024]
**Program Office** Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education**CFDA Number:** 84.101A**Program Type:** Discretionary/Competitive Grants**Also Known As:** NACTEP

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Under section 116 of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, which was reauthorized in 2018 under the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act (Perkins V), Congress appropriates roughly $16M annually for the Native American Career and Technical Education Program (NACTEP).  This program awards discretionary grants to Indian tribes, tribal organizations, Alaska Native entities or Bureau-funded schools to support career and technical education (CTE) programs that lead to one-year certificates or two-year degrees. 

TYPES OF PROJECTS

NACTEP grantees use funds for expenses associated with developing rigorous academic and technical standards, especially in preparation for high-skill, high-wage, or in--demand occupations in established or emerging professions; providing professional development to improve the quality of career and technical education teachers, principals, administrators, and counselors; and providing stipends, tuition, books, fees, childcare, counseling, job placement, transportation, supplies, specialized tools and uniforms that are necessary for students to fully and effectively participate in CTE programs. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Please visit the Perkins Collaborative Resource Network (PCRN)
# C_2016454EN.01000402.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/4

---

Taking of the oath by the new Member of the Court of Justice

(2016/C 454/08)

Following his appointment as Advocate General at the Court of Justice for the period from 16 September 2016 to 6 October 2021 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 7 September 2016, (1) Mr Tanchev took the oath before the Court of Justice on 19 September 2016.

---

(1)  OJ L 247, 15.9.2016, p. 17.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             789
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      603
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,187
<PP&E>                                          57,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,886
<BONDS>                                         35,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,759
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,137
<SALES>                                          6,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,526
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    412
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       412
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
226.570-2 Contract clause. ( a ) Use the clause at 252.226-7003, Drug-Free Work Force, in all solicitations and contracts-- ( 1 ) That invoke access to classified information; or
( 2 ) When the contracting officer determines that the clause is necessary for reasons of national security or for the purpose of protecting the health or safety of those using or affected by the product of, or performance of, the contract.
( b ) Do not use the clause in solicitations or contracts-- ( 1 ) For commercial products and commercial services;
( 2 ) When performance or partial performance will be outside the United States and its outlying areas, unless the contracting officer determines such inclusion to be in the best interest of the Government; or
( 3 ) When the value of the acquistion is at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 (KPMG LOGO) KPMG LLPSuite 2000355 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071-1568
 Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and
Shareholders

Chad Therapeutics, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Chad Therapeutics, Inc. as of March 31, 2005
and 2004 and the related statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2005. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing
audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Chad Therapeutics, Inc. as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. (KPMG LLP) Los Angeles, California
April 29, 2005 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited
liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.




---



##### 



(KPMG LOGO) KPMG LLPSuite 2000355 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071-1568
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Chad Therapeutics, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 33-93734) on Form
S-8 of Chad Therapeutics, Inc. of our report dated April 29, 2005, with respect to the balance
sheets of Chad Therapeutics, Inc. as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related statements of
operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended March 31, 2005, which report appears in the March 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Chad
Therapeutics, Inc. (KPMG LLP) Los Angeles, California
June 17, 2005 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited
liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.