alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        73,681,394
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                 126,529,295
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                7,191,665
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             208,402,099
<CASH>                                         545,506
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      13,414,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,183,999
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             50,485,730
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         44,670,377
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    11,471,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 119,110,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,183,999
<PREMIUMS>                                  44,911,245
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,119,867
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             379,060
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  36,352
<BENEFITS>                                  21,777,719
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   (435,949)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        16,110,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,994,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,439,558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,554,542
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,554,542
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              47,702,363
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         16,548,664
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            5,229,055
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           6,376,578
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            12,693,581
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             50,485,730
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
July 28, 2003

Dear Chief State School Officers:

I want to take this opportunity to thank you and your staff for your  efforts in implementing the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.  It has been a great opportunity for the Department of Education to work  with all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, approving  52 accountability plans that truly leave no child behind.

The law recognizes that in order for schools to make adequate yearly  progress, and for all students to be proficient against standards, schools  must have a highly qualified teaching force - the backbone of a good  education. By the end of the 2005-06 school year, schools must have  highly qualified teachers in each classroom. In Title I schools, where  students need the most assistance, all new hires must meet this requirement  now. We realize that your efforts in this area are ongoing, and our  goal is to provide you with guidance and technical assistance.

The provisions in the law are designed to help ensure that teachers  are equipped to provide the best instruction possible for students.  The requirements are clear, yet implementation can be complex. It is  important to note that the law offers States much flexibility in determining  certification requirements for new teachers, as well as competency in  core content areas for experienced teachers. Resources are also available  to States and districts for professional training and a wide range of  other activities to strengthen teaching quality, especially in those  schools with a high population of children in poverty.

We understand the great importance of the task you have, striving to  meet both the spirit and the letter of the law. As Under Secretary Hickok  mentioned in individual State meetings this winter, we want to be available  to build on your efforts already in progress. For this reason, the Office  of Elementary and Secondary Education within the U.S. Department of  Education would like to send out members of our Teacher Assistance Corps  to States over the coming months. We feel this process will be most  helpful as you provide guidance to local education agencies.
The Teacher Assistance Corps members want to hear what is working in  your State in the realm of teacher quality, share ideas that are working  in other places around the country, provide advice for compliance issues,  and assist in setting and meeting goals. Members of the corps are your  peers, leaders in the field of teacher quality, and key Department staff.  They will clarify any issues confused by rumor and misinformation, as  well as work with your office to determine the best way for your State  to ensure that all children have excellent teachers.

We are in the process of conducting pilot Teacher Assistance Corps  visits and will begin fully implementing the initiative soon. Department  staff will be in touch with your office, and we look forward to this  conversation.

Sincerely,

/s/

Rod Paige

cc: Office of the Governor

|Last Modified: 08/23/2003
|-------------------------
#### 209.407-3 Procedures.

Refer all matters appropriate for consideration by an agency debarring and suspending official as soon as practicable to the appropriate debarring and suspending official identified in 209.403. Any person may refer a matter to the debarring and suspending official. Follow the procedures at PGI 209.407-3.

[69 FR 74990, Dec. 15, 2004]
25.802 Procedures. ( a ) When placing contracts with contractors located outside the United States, for performance outside the United States, contracting officers must— ( 1 ) Determine the existence and applicability of any international agreements and ensure compliance with these agreements; and
( 2 ) Conduct the necessary advance acquisition planning and coordination between the appropriate U.S. executive agencies and foreign interests as required by these agreements.
( b ) The Department of State publishes many international agreements in the “United States Treaties and Other International Agreements” series. Copies of this publication normally are available in overseas legal offices and U.S. diplomatic missions.
( c ) Contracting officers must award all contracts with Taiwanese firms or organizations through the American Institute of Taiwan (AIT). AIT is under contract to the Department of State.
The following Web sites contain information that may be useful for individuals interested in the GEAR UP program. These sites contain information about GEAR UP grantees, programs upon which the GEAR UP program was modeled, and strategies for encouraging high-risk middle- and high-school students to prepare for college.  Disclaimer

- The College Board
- National Council for Community and  Education Partnerships
- Project Grad
- The I Have a Dream Foundation
- National Mentoring Partnership
- America's Promise: The Alliance for  Youth
- AVID: Proving Achievement.  Lifelong Advantage
- Archived GEAR UP Resources

Student Service Home
#### In the Matter of the Petition of William Leonard to Vacate an Assessment.

(Argued June 19, 1883 ;

decided June 26, 1883.)

*P. A. Hargous*for appellant.

*D. J. Dean*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not final; no opinion.

All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3
                             HUNTLEY & HUNTLEY, INC

                            GEOLOGISTS AND ENGINEERS

L.G. HUNTLEY 1912-1970          ESTABLISHED 1912          340 MANSFIELD AVENUE
J.R. WYLIE, JR. 1927-1974                                PITTSBURGH, PA   15220
R.S. STEWART 1948-1988                                           ----
T. BARTHOLOMEW, II                                           AREA CODE 412
              1988-1994                                         920-0800
                                                               Fax Number
                                                            (412) 920-2972


                                          December 29, 1996



Mr. Richard E. Staedtler
Chief Financial Officer
Castle Energy Corporation
One Radnor Corporate Center, Suite 250
Radnor, PA   19087

Dear Mr. Staedtler:

         We hereby consent to the use of our name and reference to our report in
the Form 10-K of Castle Energy Corporation for the year ended September 30,
1996.

Sincerely,



/s/ Keith N. Mangini
--------------------------
By:  Keith N. Mangini
President
December 29, 1996
#### Nathan Schwartz, Respondent, v. Compania Azucarera Vertientes-Camaguey de Cuba, Appellant, and Peter L. F. Sarbatino; as Temporary Receiver of the New York Assets, Respondent.

In an action under section 977-b of the Civil Practice Act to obtain the appointment of a permanent receiver of the New York assets of the defendant, a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Cuba, in which a temporary receiver has been appointed pursuant to said section, the said corporation appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 16, 1961, as granted the motion of the temporary receiver to the extent of authorizing him to pay out of the funds in his possession certain expenses, set forth in a Schedule *“*A ”, attached to the moving papers, in the aggregate amount of $595.37. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent Sabbatino, as temporary receiver (cf. *Meltzer*v. *Grazi,*10 A D 2d 869, appeal dismissed, 8 N Y 2d 911). We have previously determined appeals from other orders in this action *(Schwartz*v. *Campania Azucarera,*12 A D 2d 506; 14 A D 2d 582). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Walter E.
Skowronski, President and Director of the Company, certify that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                         
|----------------- |  | ------------------------
|February 27, 2006 |  | /s/ WALTER E. SKOWRONSKI
|                  |  | Walter E. Skowronski    
|                  |  | President and Director
Departmental Law and Postsecondary and Education is under the direction of a Deputy General  Counsel who reports directly to the General Counsel. The Deputy General Counsel  supervises and coordinates the work of two Divisions, each of which is headed  by an Assistant General Counsel and Deputy Assistant General Counsel:

The **Business and Administrative Law Division** provides legal services to Department officials concerning   business management and administrative activities throughout the Department,   including contracts, grants, procurement, employment, labor relations,   appropriations, budget, advisory committees, copyrights, trademarks, delegations   of authority, information law, and Departmental management. The Division helps   the Department carry out the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, the   Privacy Act, The Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Government in the Sunshine   Act, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, the Equal Employment   Opportunities Act, the Department of Education Organization Act, the Federal   Vacancies Reform Act, the Federal Tort Claims Act, and the Federal Acquisition   Regulations. The Division also provides advice and representation regarding   organizational matters involving the Department and claims by and against the   Department.

The **Postsecondary Education Division** provides legal services for postsecondary education programs   administered by the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education. These   programs include student financial aid programs, such as the Direct Student   Loans, Pell Grants, and Federal Family Education Loans, as well as fellowship   programs and programs to institutions of higher education for a variety of   specified purposes.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 17 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 17

  Approving the discontinuation of the process for consideration and 
  automatic implementation of the annual proposal of the Independent 
Medicare Advisory Board under section 1899A of the Social Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

   Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Risch, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Portman, Mr. 
 Cassidy, Mr. Grassley, Mr. McCain, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Heller, Mr. Thune, 
    Mr. Daines, Mr. Moran, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Isakson, and Mr. Scott) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Approving the discontinuation of the process for consideration and 
  automatic implementation of the annual proposal of the Independent 
Medicare Advisory Board under section 1899A of the Social Security Act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
discontinuation of the process for consideration and automatic 
implementation of the annual proposal of the Independent Medicare 
Advisory Board under section 1899A of the Social Security Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017047EN.01000301.xml

| 14.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 February 2017

(2017/C 47/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0629 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4359 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4780 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0673 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9018 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,02 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3137 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5022 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9177 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3867 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3917 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2471 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4808 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5113 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 223,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1809 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3062 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4485 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 158,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7283 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,059 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,6700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,276 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3159 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6261 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,1880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0629

JPY

Japanese yen

120,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4359

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84890

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4780

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0673

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9018

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,02

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3137

RON

Romanian leu

4,5022

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9177

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3867

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3917

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2471

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4808

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5113

KRW

South Korean won

1 223,31

ZAR

South African rand

14,1809

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3062

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4485

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 158,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7283

PHP

Philippine peso

53,059

RUB

Russian rouble

61,6700

THB

Thai baht

37,276

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3159

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6261

INR

Indian rupee

71,1880

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# Journal officiel C 394A/27 n

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 394A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 58e année27 novembre 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 394A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

58e année27 novembre 2015

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Eurojust |
| 2015/C 394A/01 | Avis de vacance du poste de directeur administratif d’Eurojust (grade AD 14) — La Haye (Pays-Bas) — 15/EJ/04 | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Eurojust

2015/C 394A/01

Avis de vacance du poste de directeur administratif d’Eurojust (grade AD 14) — La Haye (Pays-Bas) — 15/EJ/04

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Eurojust

| 27.11.2015 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2015

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 394/1

---

AVIS DE VACANCE DU POSTE DE DIRECTEUR ADMINISTRATIF D’EUROJUST (GRADE AD 14)

La Haye (Pays-Bas) — 15/EJ/04

(2015/C 394 A/01)

Eurojust recherche des candidatures pour le poste de directeur administratif de l’agence de coopération judiciaire de l’Union européenne. Eurojust a été créée en 2002 dans le but d’accroître l’efficacité des autorités nationales des États membres dans leur lutte contre la grande criminalité organisée transfrontalière. Eurojust est composée d’un collège de procureurs, de juges ou d’officiers de police qui sont en charge de son fonctionnement opérationnel. Le directeur administratif est chargé de l’administration quotidienne et de la gestion du personnel, sous le contrôle du président du collège d’Eurojust. Merci de consulter notre site web pour plus de détails sur la fiche de poste et la procédure de recrutement:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

La date limite de réception des candidatures est fixée au 31 janvier 2016 à minuit heure locale.

---
## Program Performance Plan

Program performance plans describe the goals and intended outcomes of U.S. Department of Education programs and initiatives.  Annual targets and strategies, along with measures for monitoring progress, are published in performance plans prior to each fiscal year.  The plans also include actual performance data showing whether targets were met in previous years.  The FY 2009 performance plan for this program, including program performance measures, historical program data, and targets, as of February 2008, may be accessed through the link below.

- FY 2009 Annual Program Performance Plan download filesMS Word (64K)

## Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)

The HBCU Capital Financing Program is in the process of collecting data for the established performance measures.  Visit the ExpectMore.gov Web site to see the Program Assessment Rating Tool information.

Institutional Service Home

|Last Modified: 03/11/2011
|-------------------------
#### 252.232-7004 DoD Progress Payment Rates.

As prescribed in 232.502-4-70(b), use the following clause:

# DoD Progress Payment Rates (OCT 2014)

If the Contractor is a small business concern, the Progress Payments clause of this contract is modified to change each mention of the progress payment rate and liquidations rate (excepting paragraph (k), Limitations on Undefinitized Contract Actions) to 90 percent.

(End of clause)

[79 FR 61582, Oct. 14, 2014]
#### 1649.101-72 FEHBP termination for default clause.

The clause set forth in 1652.249-72 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts.

[62 FR 47576, Sept. 10, 1997]
#### 2403.303-70 Reporting requirements.

Potential anti-competitive practices such as described in FAR subpart 3.3, evidenced in bids or proposals, shall be reported to the Office of General Counsel through the Head of the Contracting Activity with a copy to the Senior Procurement Executive and the Inspector General. The Office of General Counsel will provide reports to the Attorney General as appropriate.

[49 FR 7700, Mar. 1, 1984, as amended at 51 FR 7948, Mar. 7, 1986]
227.7203-8 Deferred delivery and deferred ordering of computer software and computer software documentation. ( a ) *Deferred delivery.* Use the clause at 252.227-7026, Deferred Delivery of Technical Data or Computer Software, when it is in the Government's interests to defer the delivery of computer software or computer software documentation. The clause permits the contracting officer to require the delivery of data identified as “deferred delivery” data or computer software at any time until two years after acceptance by the Government of all items (other than technical data or computer software) under the contract or contract termination, whichever is later. The obligation of subcontractors or suppliers to deliver such data expires two years after the date the prime contractor accepts the last item from the subcontractor or supplier for use in the performance of the contract. The contract must specify the computer software or computer software documentation that is subject to deferred delivery. The contracting officer shall notify the contractor sufficiently in advance of the desired delivery date for such software or documentation to permit timely delivery.
( b ) *Deferred ordering.* Use the clause at 252.227-7027, Deferred Ordering of Technical Data or Computer Software, when a firm requirement for software or documentation has not been established prior to contract award but there is a potential need for computer software or computer software documentation. Under this clause the contracting officer may order any computer software or computer software documentation generated in the performance of the contract or any subcontract thereunder at any time until three years after acceptance of all items (other than technical data or computer software) under the contract or contract termination, whichever is later. The obligation of subcontractors to deliver such technical data or computer software expires three years after the date the contractor accepts the last item under the subcontract. When the software or documentation are ordered, the delivery dates shall be negotiated and the contractor compensated only for converting the software or documentation into the prescribed form, reproduction costs, and delivery costs.