alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the Matter of: FORT DEFIANCE

HOUSING CORPORATION,

 Debtor,

BRENDA TODD; WILLIAM AUBREY,

 Defendants-Appellants,

 v.

BRENDA MOODY WHINERY, as

Chapter 11 Trustee of Fort Defiance

Housing Corporation, Inc.,

 Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nos. 11-16223, 11-16224

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01918-JAT

MEMORANDUM*

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012** 

FILED

NOV 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-16223

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, William Aubrey and Brenda Todd appeal pro

se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of their

motion for dismissal of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 in the

adversary proceeding brought against them. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 158(d). We review decisions of the bankruptcy court independently without

deference to the district court’s determinations. Leichty v. Neary, (In re Strand),

375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that

appellants failed to demonstrate mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, newly

discovered evidence, misconduct, fraud or any other basis for relief from judgment.

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), (d)(3); Hammer v. Drago (In re Hammer), 940 F.2d 524,

525 (9th Cir. 1991) (setting forth standard of review).

Appellants’ contentions that the bankruptcy court was not impartial are

unpersuasive because appellants do not point to any evidence in the record of

judicial bias. See Commercial Paper Holders v. Hine (Matter of Beverly Hills

Bancorp), 752 F.2d 1334, 1341 (9th Cir. 1984) (“Unfavorable rulings alone are

legally insufficient to require recusal.”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
3 11-16223

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

(per curiam).

AFFIRMED.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

DANTE JENKINS, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) No. 12 CV __________ 

 ) 

-vs- ) (Jury Demand) 

 ) 

VILLAGE OF DOLTON POLICE ) 

OFFICER DANIEL JOHNSON #526, ) 

And OTHER UNKNOWN VILLAGE ) 

OF DOLTON POLICE OFFICERS, ) 

And VILLAGE OF DOLTON. ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

COMPLAINT

 Plaintiff, DANTE JENKINS, by his attorney, SHELDON 

NAGELBERG, alleges as follows: 

 1. This is a civil action arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The jurisdiction 

of this Court is conferred by 28 U.S.C. 1343 and 28 U.S.C. 1367. 

 2. Plaintiff Dante Jenkins is a resident of the Northern District of 

Illinois. 

 3. Defendants Daniel Johnson #526 and unknown police officers were 

at all times relevant acting under color of their office as police officers of the 

Village of Dolton, Illinois. Each is sued in their individual capacity. 

Defendant Village of Dolton is an Illinois municipal corporation. 
2

 4. At about 2:00 A.M. on May 24, 2010 the plaintiff Dante Jenkins was 

arrested at 14209 S. Lincoln Avenue, Dolton, Illinois by the police officer 

defendants at the direction of defendant Johnson. 

 5. At all times relevant defendants Johnson and unknown officers did 

not have probable cause or a reasonable basis to arrest the plaintiff. 

 6. In response to the order of defendant Johnson to arrest the plaintiff, 

defendant Johnson used excessive and unreasonable force, including the use 

of chemical agents and beatings with a club, to place the plaintiff under 

arrest. 

 7. Defendant Johnson caused the plaintiff to be charged with the 

offenses of aggravated assault to a police officer, resisting arrest, and 

disorderly conduct. None of these charges was based on probable cause or a 

reasonable belief that the plaintiff had committed an offense. 

 8. As a result of the foregoing, the plaintiff was deprived of rights 

secured by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of 

the United States, subjected to a malicious prosecution, and suffered 

personal injuries. 

 9. Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury. 

 WHEREFORE plaintiff Dante Jenkins requests that judgment be 

entered against defendants as follows: 
3

 A. Against defendants Johnson and unknown police officers each 

in unspecified amounts greater than $50,000 for compensatory damages and 

$50,000 for punitive damages; and 

 B. That a declaratory judgment issue that defendant Village of 

Dolton is liable , as the indemnifier, for any award of compensatory damages 

on plaintiff’s federal claims against defendants Johnson and unknown police 

officers. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Sheldon Nagelberg

 Sheldon Nagelberg 

 53 West Jackson Boulevard 

 Suite 664 

 Chicago, Illinois 60604 

 312-305-5278 

 Attorney for Plaintiff
Docket No: FAA-2015-4808 Dir ID: 2014-NM-134-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/18/14

Regional Airline Association 6/18/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6/18/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 6/18/14
|   | Historical Image Display:Image Title:BAHIA DE PONCE AND APPROACHESDownload Map/Chart(right-click):25683-2-1998.jpgShare this page:TweetImage Metadata:Image:        			25683-02-1998Type:        			Nautical ChartYear:        			1998Scale:        			1:20000Publisher:        			NOAA-NOSSize:        			41.0 x 34.0 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

Privacy PolicyDisclaimerNOAA's National Ocean ServiceNOAAU.S. Department of Commerce
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 328 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 328

   Recognizing November 25, 2017, as ``Small Business Saturday'' and 
supporting the efforts of the Small Business Administration to increase 
       awareness of the value of locally owned small businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 2017

  Mr. Risch (for himself, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
 Rubio, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Udall, Mrs. Ernst, Mr. Coons, 
   Mr. Scott, Mr. Booker, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Donnelly, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
Cardin, Mr. Boozman, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
 Crapo, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Portman, Ms. Cantwell, 
   Mr. Lankford, Mr. Casey, Mr. Isakson, Mr. King, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. 
   Menendez, Ms. Collins, Mr. Tester, Mr. Daines, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. 
     Grassley, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Tillis, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Young, Ms. 
Klobuchar, Mr. Hoeven, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Thune, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Johnson, 
 Mr. Durbin, Mr. Graham, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Alexander, 
Mr. Cochran, Mr. Roberts, Ms. Murkowski, and Ms. Warren) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing November 25, 2017, as ``Small Business Saturday'' and 
supporting the efforts of the Small Business Administration to increase 
       awareness of the value of locally owned small businesses.

Whereas there are more than 29,000,000 small businesses in the United States;
Whereas small businesses represent 99.9 percent of all firms in the United 
        States;
Whereas small businesses employ more than 47 percent of the employees in the 
        private sector in the United States;
Whereas small businesses constitute nearly 98 percent of firms exporting goods;
Whereas small businesses pay more than 41 percent of the total payroll of the 
        employees in the private sector in the United States;
Whereas small business generated more than 61 percent of net new jobs created 
        between 1993 and 2016; and
Whereas November 25, 2017, is an appropriate day to recognize ``Small Business 
        Saturday'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate joins with the Small Business 
Administration in--
            (1) recognizing and encouraging the observance of ``Small 
        Business Saturday'' on November 25, 2017; and
            (2) supporting efforts--
                    (A) to encourage consumers to shop locally; and
                    (B) to increase awareness of the value of locally 
                owned small businesses and the impact of locally owned 
                small businesses on the economy of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016484EN.01002101.xml

| 24.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 484/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 484/21

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 December 2016

(2016/C 484/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0446 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4342 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85278 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6460 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0711 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0928 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,68 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4098 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5318 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,6674 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4566 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4117 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1069 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5195 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5114 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 257,59 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6353 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2555 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 034,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6735 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,002 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,0085 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,564 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4146 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6150 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,8275 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0446

JPY

Japanese yen

122,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4342

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85278

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6460

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0711

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0928

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,68

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4098

RON

Romanian leu

4,5318

TRY

Turkish lira

3,6674

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4566

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4117

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1069

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5195

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5114

KRW

South Korean won

1 257,59

ZAR

South African rand

14,6353

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2555

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 034,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6735

PHP

Philippine peso

52,002

RUB

Russian rouble

64,0085

THB

Thai baht

37,564

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4146

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6150

INR

Indian rupee

70,8275

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00377

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF ROGELIO GUERRA

AND SUSAN RABEL GUERRA
On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- DCL

- 02658

JUDGMENT
Th is Court ’ s judgment issued on Au gust 1 8, 2022 , is hereby withdrawn and the following is substituted there for. THE THIRTEENTH COU R T OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this d e cision certified below for observance.
November 10 , 2022
#### The Mackinnon Pen Company et al., Respondents, *v.*The Fountain Ink Company et al., Appellants.

(Argued October 16,1883 ;

decided October 26, 1883.)

*Samuel Jones*for appellants.

*Edmund Coffin, Jr.,*for respondents.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Kroha, Clereece (OST) 

Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:56 AM 

'Mike Borsetti'; 'Don H. Hainbach' 

. '"'; : 

Cc: Workie, Blane (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST);\Dols"/ Joriathan (OST) 

Subject: Motion for Leave to File a Reply to British Airways' Answer - Docket DOTOST -2014-0166 

Importance: High 

Mr. Borsetti and Mr. Hainbach: 

By this email, the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings is notifying the parties that Mr. Borsetti's 

November 12, 2014, Motion for Leave to File a Reply to British Airways' Answer in the above-referenced 

docket is granted. Granting the motion will provide the complainant the opportunity to address information 

that he states he was unaware of until it was presented in British Airways' Answer. Mr. Borsetti's reply is due 

by November 24, 2014, and British Airways response is due by December 15, 2014. 

I will place this email in the docket. 

Regards, 

Clereece Kroha 

Senior Trial Attorney 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Office ofthe General Counsel 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

202-366-9041 

1
Page 22
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
I, John P. Derham Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of TheCato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:
1. the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 30, 2004 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Date: December 6, 2004     /s/ John P. Derham Cato  John P. Derham Cato  Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017101EN.01000101.xml

| 31.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8393 — Thyssenkrupp Technologies/Thyssenkrupp/Atlas Elektronik)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 101/01)

On 22 March 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8393. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8393. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4,423,389
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,804,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,780,303
<PP&E>                                         1,819,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,116,075)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,421,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,843,375
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    83
<COMMON>                                       1,031,197
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,552,814)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,421,841
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,563,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (17,346)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,233,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,233,547)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                416,248
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,817,299)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### 252.204-7013 [Reserved]
### How to Apply for Funding: HEERF III-Strengthening Institutions Program (ALN 84.425M)

*Note: Supplements will be automatically awarded.*

- Grants.gov  Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants
- How to upload a Workspace
- Applicant Overview Training for       Grants.gov
- Training Resources for Grants.gov

### Eligible Institutions of Higher Education may utilize HEERF (a)(2) grant funds for Construction, Renovation and Real Property Projects. Below are the FAQs, form, and instructions for this purpose.

- HEERF (a)(2) FAQs
- HEERF (a)(2) Construction, Renovation, and Real Property Projects Prior Approval Request
- HEERF (a)(2) Construction, Renovation, and Real Property Informational Power Point Presentation (June 2022) 

**Application deadline March 07, 2022.**

### **Reopening;** Notice Inviting Applications for Funds Under the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF), Section 2003 of the American Rescue Plan (ARP) for Institutions of Higher Education (IHE) That Meet the Criteria as a Strengthening Institutions Program (SIP)

### **Certification  & Agreement:**(a)(2) Strengthening Institutions Program (ALN 84.425M)

*Note: This is for institutions that did not previously receive HEERF SIP funding. This document is provided for reference as an example of the agreement that will be attached to your institution’s supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the supplement is automatically made.*

### **Supplemental  Agreement:**(a)(2) Strengthening Institutions Program (ALN 84.425M)

*Note: This is for institutions that received CARES Act HEERF SIP funding. This document is provided for reference as an example of the agreement attached to your institution’s supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the supplement is automatically made.*

### **Notice Inviting Applications:**(a)(2) Supplemental Assistance for Strengthening Institutions Program (ALN 84.425M)

(August 11, 2021)

### Formula  allocations

- Allocations for Section 2003 (a)(2) of ARP Act
- Methodology for  Calculating Allocations

Cares Act HEERF Home
TS-ASLT40/50 

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d 

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter 
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing
#### 237.7202 Limitations.

Educational service agreements are not used to provide special courses or special fees for Government students.

[56 FR 36424, July 31, 1991, as amended at 83 FR 16005, Apr. 13, 2018]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 257 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 257

    Designating September 16, 2017, as ``Isaac M. Wise Temple Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2017

    Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Portman) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating September 16, 2017, as ``Isaac M. Wise Temple Day''.

Whereas 2017 marks the 175th anniversary of the incorporation of the 
        congregation of the Isaac M. Wise Temple in Cincinnati, Ohio;
Whereas 2017 marks the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the current 
        site for the Isaac M. Wise Temple, also known as the ``Plum Street 
        Temple'';
Whereas Rabbi Isaac M. Wise led that congregation for nearly a half century, 
        establishing the congregation as the cradle of American Reform Judaism 
        and helping to make Cincinnati a center of Jewish life in the United 
        States;
Whereas Rabbi Isaac M. Wise founded the Union of American Hebrew Congregations 
        (now known as the ``Union for Reform Judaism'') in 1873 and the Central 
        Conference of Reform Rabbis in 1889 to help lead the United States 
        Jewish Reform movement;
Whereas Rabbi Isaac M. Wise founded the Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati in 
        1875, now the oldest rabbinical school in continuous existence in the 
        United States; and
Whereas the Isaac M. Wise Plum Street Temple is listed on the National Register 
        of Historic Places for the significant role that the Temple played in 
        the history of Reform Judaism and for the unique Moorish architectural 
        style of the Temple: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 16, 2017, as ``Isaac M. Wise 
        Temple Day''; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of the Isaac M. Wise Temple 
        in--
                    (A) United States Jewish history;
                    (B) establishing Cincinnati, Ohio, as a great 
                center of Jewish life; and
                    (C) contributing to religious life in the United 
                States.
                                 <all>
```