alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 154 

Promoting awareness of motorcycle profiling and encouraging collaboration 

and communication with the motorcycle community and law enforcement 

officials to prevent instances of profiling. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. KING, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. 

ERNST, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. SULLIVAN, and Mr. CRAPO) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

DECEMBER 11, 2018 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Promoting awareness of motorcycle profiling and encouraging 

collaboration and communication with the motorcycle 

community and law enforcement officials to prevent instances of profiling. 

Whereas motorcycle ridership has continued to increase over 

time with registrations growing from 3,826,373 in 1997 

to 8,600,936 in 2015; 

Whereas, as of August 2016, the ongoing National Motorcycle Profiling Survey 2016, conducted by the Motorcycle 

Profiling Project, found that approximately 1⁄2 of the moVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:45 Dec 13, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR154.ATS SR154

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 154 ATS 

torcyclists surveyed felt that they had been profiled by 

law enforcement at least once; 

Whereas motorcycle profiling means the illegal use of the fact 

that a person rides a motorcycle or wears motorcycle related apparel as a factor in deciding to stop and question, 

take enforcement action, arrest, or search a person or vehicle with or without legal basis under the Constitution 

of the United States; 

Whereas complaints surrounding motorcycle profiling have 

been cited in all 50 States; 

Whereas nationwide protests to raise awareness and combat 

motorcycle profiling have been held in multiple States; 

Whereas in 2011, Washington signed into law legislation 

stating that the criminal justice training commission 

shall ensure that issues related to motorcycle profiling 

are addressed in basic law enforcement training and offered to in-service law enforcement officers in conjunction 

with existing training regarding profiling; 

Whereas reported incidents of motorcycle profiling have 

dropped approximately 90 percent in the State of Washington since the 2011 legislation was signed into law; and 

Whereas in the spring of 2016, Maryland became the second 

State to pass a law addressing the issue of motorcycle 

profiling: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) promotes increased public awareness on the 

3 issue of motorcycle profiling; 

4 (2) encourages collaboration and communica5 tion with the motorcycle community and law enforceVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:45 Dec 13, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR154.ATS SR154

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 154 ATS 

1 ment to engage in efforts to end motorcycle 

2 profiling; and 

3 (3) urges State law enforcement officials to in4 clude statements condemning motorcycle profiling in 

5 written policies and training materials. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

6-1166-EMM-299R1

Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
Honolulu International Airport
P.O. Box 30008
Honolulu, HI  96820-0008


Subject:          Other Matters

Reference:        Purchase Agreement No. 2252 (the Purchase Agreement) between
                  McDonnell Douglas Corporation (MDC) and Hawaiian Airlines,
                  Inc. (Customer) relating to Model 717-22A aircraft (the
                  Aircraft)

This Letter Agreement amends and supplements the Purchase Agreement. All terms
used but not defined in this Letter Agreement have the same meaning as in the
Purchase Agreement.

1.       DELIVERY SCHEDULE.

         -----------------------------------------------------------


         The provisions of Letter Agreement 6-1166-EMM-0272 would not be
applicable in the event Customer requests a further delay in delivery beyond the
revised delivery date.

2.       SEPTEMBER 2001 AIRCRAFT

         -----------------------------------------------------------



3.       CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

         Customer understands that certain commercial and financial information
contained in this Letter Agreement are considered by MDC as confidential.
Customer agrees that it will treat this Letter Agreement and the information
contained herein as confidential and will not, without the prior written consent
of MDC, disclose this Letter Agreement or any information contained herein to
any other person or entity, except to the extent that such disclosure is
required by law


<PAGE>

or by any Government Entity (as such term is defined below), provided that
Customer gives reasonable notice to MDC so as to enable MDC to seek appropriate
protective orders or, if possible, challenge the requirement of such disclosure.
As used herein, "Government Entity" means (i) any national government, political
subdivision thereof, or local jurisdiction therein, (ii) any instrumentality,
board, commission, court, or agency of any of the above, however constituted,
and (iii) any association, organization, or institution of which any of the
above is a member or to whose jurisdiction any therof is subject or in whose
activities any of the above is a participant.



Very truly yours,

MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION
a wholly-owned subsidiary of
THE BOEING COMPANY


By  /s/
  -------------------------------

Its      Attorney-In-Fact
   ------------------------------


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this

Date:  March 1, 2000

HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.


By  /s/
  -------------------------------

Its
   ------------------------------


By  /s/
  -------------------------------

Its
   ------------------------------
### As of January 4, 2023, updates for this page are no longer available. This page will be deleted on or before February 15th.

Please visit our new Shared Ancestry or Ethnic Characteristics page at: **https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/sharedancestry.html**
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 14 (Monday, January 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6878-6879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01481]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Publication of Housing Price Inflation Adjustment

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary (Personnel and Readiness), 
Department of Defense (DoD).

[[Page 6879]]


ACTION: Notice of housing price inflation adjustment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is announcing the 2020 rent 
threshold under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. Applying the 
inflation adjustment for 2020, the maximum monthly rental amount as of 
January 1, 2021, will be $4,089.62.

DATES: These housing price inflation adjustments are effective January 
1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lt. Col. Patrick Schwomeyer, Office of 
the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, (703) 692-
8170.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, as 
codified at 50 U.S.C. App. 3951, prohibits a landlord from evicting a 
Service member (or the Service member's family) from a residence during 
a period of military service, except by court order. The law as 
originally passed by Congress applied to dwellings with monthly rents 
of $2,400 or less. The law requires the Department of Defense to adjust 
this amount annually to reflect inflation and to publish the new amount 
in the Federal Register. Applying the inflation adjustment for 2020, 
the maximum monthly rental amount for 50 U.S.C. App. 3951(a)(1)(A)(ii) 
as of January 1, 2021, will be $4,089.62.

    Dated: January 19, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-01481 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### 222.7401 Definition.

*Covered subcontractor,* as used in this subpart, is defined in the clause at 252.222-7006, Restrictions on the Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements.

[75 FR 76297, Dec. 8, 2010]
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 6 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to equal rights for men and women. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2017 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. 

COONS, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. MARKEY, and Ms. WARREN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to equal rights for men and women. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 6 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Equality of rights under the law shall 

3 not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any 

4 State on account of sex. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to 

6 enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this 

7 article. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall take effect 2 years 

9 after the date of ratification.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### 225.7102-1 Policy.

When acquiring the following forging items, whether as end items or components, acquire items that are of domestic manufacture to the maximum extent practicable:

| Items | Categories |
| --- | --- |
| Ship propulsion shafts | Excludes service and landing craft shafts. |
| Periscope tubes | All. |
| Ring forgings for bull gears | All greater than 120 inches in diameter. |
### FILED June 2, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT KNOXVILLE APRIL 1999 SESSION STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) C.C.A. No. 03C01-9811-CR-00382 Appellee, ) ) WASHINGTON COUNTY NOS: ) 23800, 23044 VS. ) ) HON. ARDEN L. HILL, ) JUDGE KARA M. CONERO, ) ) AFFIRMED -

RULE 20 Appellant. ) O R D E R Petitioner, Kara M. Conero , appeal s the trial court’s r evocation of her community

corrections program an d reinstatement of the or ig in al se nt en ce . We affirm the dismissal pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tennessee Cou rt of Criminal Appeals.
I.
On November 5, 1997, petitioner pled guilty to failure to appear and forgery over $1,000. She received

an effective four-year sentence req uiring ja il time followed by probation. On February 6, 1998, the trial court found petit ioner to be in violation of her probation and transferred her into the co mmunity corrections pro gram in lieu of incarceration. On February7, 1998, petitioner used marijuan a. She reported to the community

corrections officer on Febru ary 9, 1998, and tested positive for marij uana. Petitioner

was advised to repor

t to the community

corrections

officer on a daily basis to avoid further incarcer ation. Petitioner never again reported to the community corrections officer. After a violation hearing on May 20, 1998, the trial court revoked petitioner’s community corrections s entence and reinstated the four-y ear sentence.2 II.
Petiti oner

contends she is a drug addi ct, and the trial court er red by no t authorizingfurther split confine ment fol lowed by an in-patient drug treatment program. Revocation of pr obation or

community corrections i s subject to an abuse of discretion standard of rev iew, rather than a de novo standard. State v . Harkins , 811 S.W.2d 79, 82 (Tenn. 1991). Petitioner repeatedly violated the con ditions of alternat ive sentencing. The trial co urt did not abuse its dis cretion by revoki ng alternative sentencing

and requiring the peti

tioner to serve her sentence.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court i s aff irmed in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals. Costs shall be assessed against the state since petitioner is indigent.

_________________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

CONCUR:

________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JU DGE

________________________________ NORMA MCGE E OGLE, JUDGE
Functional Statements > Federal Student Aid

## B. Office of the Principal Deputy to the Chief Operating Officer

The Office of the Principal Deputy to the Chief Operating Officer (COO) is led by the COO- empowered official who acts in the COO’s absence and strategizes, collaborates across the mission support offices. The Principal Deputy to the COO serves to establish a leadership framework of trust, shared understanding, and strategic guidance. Additionally, the mission support functions will be consolidated under this office to deliver agile and responsive enterprise services to integrate FSA’s operational business units (i.e., the Office of Student Experience and Aid Delivery (SEAD), the Office of Partner Participation and Oversight (PPO), the Office of Strategic Measures and Outcomes (SMO), and the Office of Strategy, Innovation, and Transformation (SIT)). The office provides strategic focus, economies of scale, and cross-functional collaboration and synergy to improve support services across the enterprise. The Principal Deputy to the COO will oversee the following mission support business units:

- Acquisitions Directorate
- Finance Directorate
- Strategic Communications Directorate
- Management Services Directorate
- Enterprise Technology Directorate
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

September 28, 2020 

Honorable Alfred Ada 

Commissioner of Education 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands Public School System 

P.O. Box 501370 CK 

Saipan, MP 96950 

pss.coe@cnmipss.org

Dear Commissioner Ada: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant award H181A180025. 

The Department received your September 10. 2020 request on behalf of the Commonwealth of 

the Northern Mariana Islands Public School System for a waiver extending the period of 

availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

(IDEA) Part C grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part C grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) State lead Lucille Sleger at 

Lucille.Sleger@ed.gov, if you have any questions. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services

cc: Part C Coordinator
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine Sicker, Respondent, v. Karl Schroll & Associates, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from, a decision and award of death benefits on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s finding of causal relationship. Decedent, age 63, was employed as a worker on a steamship. On September 5, 1960 decedent consulted Dr. Flynn complaining of painful buttocks which he attributed to having backed into a packing case on July 25. Dr. Flynn diagnosed a hematoma and advised decedent to go to a hospital. Ignoring this advice, decedent went to work the following day but collapsed on the job and was immediately hospitalized. On September 7 Dr. Flynn incised the area and packed it. Decedent’s condition, however failed to improve; uremia commenced to overtake him, and on September 22 he died. An autopsy revealed the cause of death as diffuse lymphosarcoma. Claimant *926took the .position that the July 25 incident produced the alleged hematoma necessitating operative procedures which in turn hastened decedent’s demise and introduced medical testimony to this effect. The board could not arrive at a decision and submitted the ease to an impartial specialist who quite decisively opined that there was absolutely no causal relationship between the alleged trauma and decedent’s death and that it was not possible to say that the diagnostic and operative procedures performed hastened death. Nevertheless the board found that “ although he had an underlying cancerous condition from which he probably would have died eventually at some future date, the operative procedures *necessitated by the accident,*resulted in hastening of that death.” (Emphasis added.) It is conceded, however, that there was, in fact, no hematoma, the black and blue area being due entirely to cancerous hemorrhaging, and the board ■has so found. Therefore the operative procedures which the .board found hastened death were not necessitated by any accident and were thus not related to employment. They were merely undertaken as a result of a mistaken diagnosis. Decision and award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Bergan, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### 237.7501 Definition.

*Facilities project,* as used in this subpart, means a Government project to provide, modernize, or replace real property for use by a contractor in performing a Government contract or subcontract.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Anahita Villafane, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Creative Computer Applications, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:



|Date: November 21, 2003 |  | /S/ANAHITA VILLAFANEAnahita Villafane Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
#### Kenneth Waring et al., Respondents, v Makram W. Guirguis et al., Appellants.

[834 NYS2d 290]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated May 8, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

*742Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The plaintiffs were involved in an automobile accident on December 17, 2000. They allege that certain medical records demonstrate that they both suffered from bulging and/or herniated discs and that as a result, their ranges of motion are so substantially impaired as to constitute serious injuries.

However, the mere existence of a herniated or bulging disc is not evidence of a serious injury in the absence of objective evidence of the extent of the alleged physical limitations resulting from the disc injury and its duration *(see Whitfield-Forbes v Pazmino,*36 AD3d 901 [2007]; *Mejia v DeRose,*35 AD3d 407 [2006]; *Yakubov v CG Trans Corp.,*30 AD3d 509, 510 [2006]; *Cerisier v Thibiu,*29 AD3d 507, 508 [2006]; *Bravo v Rehman,*28 AD3d 694, 695 [2006]; *Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth.,*16 AD3d 45, 50 [2005]; *Diaz v Turner,*306 AD2d 241 [2003]).

The defendants made a prima facie showing that neither of the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]; *Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth., supra).*In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Neither the affidavit of the plaintiffs’ examining chiropractor nor the plaintiffs’ affidavits adequately explain the five-year gap in medical treatment *(see Pommells v Perez,*4 NY3d 566 [2005]; *Cervino v Gladysz-Steliga,*36 AD3d 744 [2007]; *Chan v Casiano,*36 AD3d 580 [2007]; *Farozes v Kamran,*22 AD3d 458 [2005]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
This webpage includes a compilation of materials pertaining to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) American Rescue Plan (ARP) supplemental funds for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2021. IDEA funds are appropriated by Congress and are intended to support early intervention and special education services for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities and their families. 

 On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-2) was signed into law. Of the $130 billion that was allocated to the Department, the following amounts were earmarked for IDEA grant awards as supplemental FFY 2021 funds:
      - IDEA Part B, 611
      - $2.5 billion
      - IDEA Part B, 619
      - $200 million
      - IDEA Part C
      - $250 million

These funds are provided to state educational agencies and lead agencies to help recover from the impact of the coronavirus pandemic and to safely reopen schools and sustain safe operations. The IDEA Part B formula grants assist states in providing a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment for children with disabilities ages 3 through 21 (Part B, Sections 611 and 619). The IDEA Part C formula grants assist states in providing early intervention services for infants and toddlers birth through age two and their families.

## Funding

      -  Fact Sheet: Section 2014 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (July 1, 2021; PDF, 233KB)
      - Estimated American  Rescue Plan IDEA Supplemental Grant Allocations
      - Fiscal Year 2021 Allocations for Grants to States — Individuals With Disabilities Education Act — Part B, Section 611 — Table I (Excel, 90KB)
      - Fiscal Year 2021 Allocations for Preschool Grants — Individuals With Disabilities Education Act — Part B, Section 619 — Table II (Excel, 40KB)
      - Fiscal Year 2021 Allocations for  Grants for  Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities and Their Families — Individuals With Disabilities Education Act  — Part C — Table III (Excel, 19KB)
      - Section III — FFY 2021 IDEA Part C ARP Funds (MS Word, 42KB)
      - Section III — FFY 2021 IDEA Part C Formula Grant (MS Word, 42KB)

## Other Resources

      - Office of Elementary and Secondary Education American Rescue Plan Resources
      FAQ:  Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Programs  Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Programs
 (May 2021; PDF, 856KB)