alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Version 1.1

 

ENVIRONMENTAL::

□  Check for people, animals, property in the flight vicinity.

□  Notify any bystanders or nearby property owner of your intentions.

□  If flying FPV, discuss flight plan with your check‐pilot.

□  If flying in controlled airspace, notify airspace authority of your intentions.

□  First Aid / Safety Kit on hand,  stocked, readily accessible, and visible to anyone in the area

HARDWARE / EQUIPMENT::

== VISUALLY INSPECT THE AIRFRAME ==

□  Cracks (especially in high stress areas like joints)

□  Loose or damaged screws / fasteners / bands / straps / ties

□  Loose or damaged wiring

□  Loose or damaged connections (solder, plugs, etc)

□  Inspect prop mounts & screws & apply slight counter pressure on arms to check for loosened construction

□  For FPV, inspect/clean FPV and/or Gopro camera lens and ensure that cameras are secured

□  Battery/batteries fully charged, properly seated & secured

□  Remove props and test fail‐safe behavior (if applicable)

□  Props are smooth and free of damage/defect (check blade, surface, & hub)

□  Tighten prop adapters (careful not to over tighten which may damage prop)

□  Ensure voltage alarm is connected

□  Ensure arming/idle timeout is properly configured (6‐15 seconds is generally acceptable)

□  Check whether the right model is selected in the transmitter (if applicable)

□  Check your RC transmitter shows the right range and centering for all sticks

□  If desired, perform range test

PRE‐FLIGHT::

== POWER UP ==

□  Batteries charged & secured

□  Position quad in a level, safe location for takeoff

□  For FPV, power up ground station, video receiver, goggles, etc

□  If using onboard video recorder (i.e., Gopro), turn on camera

□  All transmitter controls move freely in all directions

□  All transmitter trims in its neutral position

□  All transmitter switches in correct position (typically away)

□  Transmitter throttle to zero

□  Radio transmitter on

□  Connect/power on battery to airframe

□  Ensure led indicators & audible tones are all correct

□  Timer on (if applicable)

□  For FPV, check video in goggles

□  Scan for nearby people or animals

□  Stand clear ‐ audibly, loudly announce the word "CLEAR!"

□  Arm flight controller

== PRE TAKEOFF ==

□  Increase throttle slightly listening for any abnormalities

□  Short 20‐30 second hover at 3‐5 feet  

(listen for any weird vibrations or anything that sounds loose)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated December 14, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Alpha
Technologies Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 27, 2002. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
33-11627, effective January 29, 1987, File No. 33-17359, effective September 28,
1987, File No. 33-20706, effective March 17, 1988, File No. 33-29636, effective
June 30, 1989, File No. 3-48663, effective June 23, 1992, File No. 333-03001,
effective April 30, 1996 and File No. 333-61708, effective May 25, 2001) and on
Form S-3, File No. 333-10311, effective August 16, 1996.



/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Houston, Texas
February 11, 2003
# C_2016373EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8165 — Eneco/Elicio/Norther JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 373/01)

On 5 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8165. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8165. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
On November 24, 2014, Youngstown State University signed an Agreement to resolve a Section 504 /Title II compliance review that OCR initiated to examine the accessibility of the University’s websites to persons with disabilities, particularly those with sensory impairments who might use assistive technology to access the sites.  The Agreement requires the University to develop, adopt, and provide notice and training on a web accessibility policy and an implementation and remediation plan to ensure adherence to the policy; review its website and e-learning platform(s) to identify and correct any accessibility problems; provide certification from a third-party web accessibility consultant or a qualified University employee that the University’s electronic and information technologies meet the technical standard(s) adopted by the school; and provide OCR with reports describing its efforts to comply with its web accessibility policy and plan for multiple subsequent school years, including information documenting any compliance issues discovered through the monitoring, audits, or complaints and the actions taken to correct those issues.  The University also agreed to adopt and publish an appropriate notice of nondiscrimination, including appropriate notice of its Section 504 and Title II coordinators.  Further, the University agreed to ensure that access to computer labs, especially regarding provision of assistive technology, is comparable to that of students without disabilities and that accurate notice is given to students, faculty, staff, and other beneficiaries able to utilize University computer labs that such services are available.

***Read the Press Release | Read the Resolution Letter PDF**(318K)**| Read the Resolution Agreement PDF**(180K)*

  

Top
#### 22.406-13 Semiannual enforcement reports.

A semiannual report on compliance with and enforcement of the construction labor standards requirements of the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute and Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards statute is required from each contracting agency. The reporting periods are October 1 through March 31 and April 1 through September 30. The reports shall only contain information as to the enforcement actions of the contracting agency and shall be prepared as prescribed in Department of Labor memoranda and submitted to the Department of Labor within 30 days after the end of the reporting period. This report has been assigned interagency report control number 1482-DOL-SA.

[79 FR 24204, Apr. 29, 2014]
#### In the Matter of the Petition of John J. Bradley to Vacate an Assessment.

(Argued June 29, 1883;

decided October 2, 1883.)

The assessment in question was for regulating, etc., Ninety-sixth street in the city of New York from the Boulevard-to the Hudson river.

The following is the mem. handed down herein.

“ So much of the grading of Ninety-sixth street as was done on the block between Eleventh avenue and Riverside avenue was done in accordance with the legally established grade. The petitioner ought, therefore, to bear his proportion of the expense of that work. The grading between Riverside avenue and Twelfth avenue was not in accordance with the legally established grade, but required less filling, and consequently cost less than if it had been done in _ accordance with the lawful grade, and, if the expense incurred were the only point in*649volved, we should, in conformity with the decision in *In re Mutual Life Ins. Co.*(89 N. Y. 530), hold that the petitioner was not aggrieved by the change of grade and could not maintain this proceeding. But his complaint is that the change of grade between Riverside and Twelfth avenues was a material injury to his property, and this allegation was sustained by the proofs. He should not, therefore, be compelled to contribute to the expense of that part of the work. The number of feet of filling in that portion of the work appears from the papers, and it is quite practicable to apportion the expense. The order of the General Term which dismisses the petition of the appellant should be reversed, and the matter should be remitted to the Special Term to ascertain how much of the total amount of the assessment is for the work between Riverside avenue and Twelfth avenue, and to reduce the assessment accordingly, without costs to either party.”

*John C. Shaw*for appellant.

*D. J. Dean*for respondent.

Rapallo, J.,

reads for reversal, etc., as appears by mem. above.

All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.

Ordered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT32**

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,2006 (the “Report”) by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (the “Company”), each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade NaturalGas Corporation and will be retained by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or staff upon request.
|        |   | Date: February  8, 2007                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                   |
|   |   | /s/ David W.  Stevens                  |
|   |   | David W. Stevens                       |
|   |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                                   |
|   |   | /s/ James E.  Haug                     |
|   |   | James E. Haug                          |
|   |   | Chief Accounting  Officer              |

 

----
2015.606-1 Receipt and initial review. ( a ) The Division of Contracts and Property Management shall acknowledge receipt of an unsolicited proposal, complete a preliminary review, assign a docket number, and send copies of the unsolicited proposal to the appropriate program office Director(s) or designee for evaluation.
( b ) The Division of Contracts and Property Management shall be responsible for controlling reproduction and distribution of proposal material by notifying evaluators of their responsibilities and tracking the number of proposals received and forwarded to evaluators.
( c ) An acknowledgment letter will be sent to the proposer by The Division of Contracts and Property Management. The letter will provide an estimated date for a funding decision or identifying the reasons for non-acceptance of the proposal for review in accordance with FAR 15.606-1(b) and FAR 15.606-1(c).
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES World Trade Center Health Program

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention (CDC )

National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health (NIOSH)

395 E Street, S.W.

Suite 9200, Patriots Plaza

Washington, D.C. 20201

PHONE: (202) 245

- 0625

FAX: (202) 2 4 5

- 0628



### October 5, 2011

Elizabeth Ward, Ph.D.

Chair, WTC Health Program Scientific/Technical Advisory Committee

c/o American Cancer Society October 5, 2011

250 Williams Street, N.W., Suite 600

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Dr. Ward:

Let me take this opportunity to thank you, and each member of the World Trade Center (WTC) Health Program

Scientific/Technical Advisory Committee (STAC), for the important service you are providing to the Department of

Health and Human Services. I am writi ng to request the STAC’s advice on a petition to add a health condition to the

List of World Trade Center (WTC)

- Related Health Conditions (“List”).

In accordance with Section 3312(a)(6) of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 (“Act”) , nine

members of Congress submitted a petition to consider adding cancer to the List. I request that the STAC review the

available information on cancer outcomes associated with the exposures resulting from the September 11, 2001,

terrorist attacks, and p rovide advice on whether to add cancer, or a certain type of cancer, to the List specified in the

Zadroga Act.

Two reports are provided with this letter that may aid members in their task: (1) “First Periodic Review of Scientific

and Medical Evidence Rela ted to Cancer for the World Trade Center Health Program”; and(2) “Early assessment of

cancer outcomes in New York City firefighters after the 9/11 attacks: an observational cohort study.” If the members

need any additional information, reports, or assistan ce, please contact Paul J. Middendorf, PhD, (513.841.4466;

pkm2@cdc.gov), the STAC’s Designated Federal Official.

To be maximally beneficial, any advice provided by the STAC as a whole, or by any individual member, about

whether to add cancer, or a type o f cancer, to the List, should include a description of the scientific and/or technical

evidence relied on, a description of the quality of the data supporting the advice, and a description of the methods

used in formulating the advice. Under the Act, the S TAC has at least 60 days from this request and up to a maximum

of 180 days to provide advice. Since the STAC will not be impaneled until November 8, 2011, nor officially meet until

November 9 and 10, 2011, the STAC will have until March 2, 2012 to consider the request, review the available

information, and provide their advice.

Sincerely,

John Howard, M.D.

Administrator, World Trade Center Health Program
IN THEUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES

                                                     

      Vs.                                                                          12 CR 326   

                                                                      

                 JUDGE LEFKOW                              

ABDEL  AZIM  EL‐SIDDIG  (ELSIDDIG)

      

ORDER

Being fully advise, and taking into account the Probation Department’s non‐opposition, this

Court hereby grants Mr. Abdel Azim El‐Siddig  ( Elsiddig) request to travel to, Saudi Arabia, from

December 1, 2013 to January 30, 2014

Dated:   November 19, 2013                                        ___________________________

                                                                                          The Honorable Joan H. Lekow

                                                                                           U.S. District Judge

So  Ordered

Case: 1:12-cr-00326 Document #: 16 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:254
Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Cascade Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ ROBERT C. WARREN, JR.
|Robert C. Warren, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer  
|December 3, 2010         
|                         
|/s/ JOSEPH G. POINTER    
|Joseph G. Pointer        
|Chief Financial Officer  
|December 3, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**TWL REALTY, LLC AND KEYSTONE CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC.** 

**v.**

**WEST HANOVER TOWNSHIP ZONING**

**HEARING BOARD**

**BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF WEST HANOVER TOWNSHIP,** 

**Intervenor**

**PETITION OF: BOARD OF**

**SUPERVISORS OF WEST HANOVER TOWNSHIP,** 

**Intervenor :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 87 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
#### In re NEW YORK & N. S. RY. CO. In the matter of the application of the New York & North Shore Railway Company for a peremptory writ of mandamus against Robert Grier Monroe, as commissioner, etc.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Publications

Appendix Table A2. Tag loss estimates among marked groups of subyearling chinook salmon after a 30-day holding period; Tanner Creek vs. midstream Columbia River release, 1991.

aAG D1 D2 = Agency code, Data 1 code, Data 2 code.bNT = Number of branded fish in the sample with no coded-wire tag.cNumber of fish checked for the presence of coded-wire tags. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
**Exhibit 31.2** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of International Lease Finance Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual    report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this annual report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual    report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that    has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially    affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial    reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal controls over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: March 16, 2006     /s/  Alan H.    Lund        Alan H. Lund*Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and**Chief Accounting Officer*
#### 225.372-1 General.

Information and guidance pertaining to DoD antiterrorism/force protection policy for contracts that require performance or travel outside the United States can be obtained from the offices listed in PGI 225.372-1.

[80 FR 36902, June 26, 2015]
#### M. Parisi & Son Construction Co., Inc., Appellant, v Long Island Obs/Gyn, P.C., et al. Respondents.

[834 NYS2d 324]—

*820In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered December 27, 2005, which denied its motion to vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404 and to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A plaintiff seeking to restore a case to the trial calendar more than one year after it has been marked “off,” and after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, must demonstrate a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay, a lack of intent to abandon the action, and a lack of prejudice to the defendants *(see Krichmar v Queens Med. Imaging, P.C.,*26 AD3d 417, 418 [2006]; *Basetti v Nour,*287 AD2d 126, 130-131 [2001]; *Schwartz v Mandelbaum & Gluck,*266 AD2d 273, 274 [1999]).

Here, the plaintiff failed to satisfy all four components of the test. The plaintiffs excuse that it was searching for discovery documents requested by the defendants nearly five years before its motion did not adequately explain the delay *(see Swedish v Bourie,*233 AD2d 495, 496 [1996]). Furthermore, by neglecting to provide any evidence of its activities since the dismissal of the action, the plaintiff failed to rebut the presumption of abandonment that attaches after a case is dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 *(see Krichmar v Queens Med. Imaging, P.C., supra).*Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion was properly denied.

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.P, Ritter, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.