alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-16325) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan of ACR Group, Inc.
and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-42701) pertaining to the
registration of 2,411,667 shares of common stock of ACR Group, Inc. of our
report dated April 23, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of ACR Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended February 28, 1999.




                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Houston, Texas
May 26, 1999
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officerpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with thequarterly report of Cascade Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)                                     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  ROBERT C. WARREN, JR. |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Warren, Jr. |
| *Chief Executive Officer*  |
| June 8, 2007               |
|                       |
| /s/ RICHARD S. ANDERSON    |   |
| Richard S. Anderson        |
| *Chief Financial Officer*  |
| June 8, 2007               |

 

1

----
#### 252.225-7054 Prohibition on Use of Certain Energy Sourced from Inside the Russian Federation.

As prescribed in 225.7019-4(b), use the following clause:

# Prohibition on Use of Certain Energy Sourced From Inside the Russian Federation (JAN 2023)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Covered military installation* means a military installation in Europe identified by DoD as a main operating base.

*Furnished energy* means energy furnished to a covered military installation in any form and for any purpose, including heating, cooling, and electricity.

*Main operating base* means a facility outside the United States and its territories with permanently stationed operating forces and robust infrastructure.

(b) *Prohibition.* In accordance with section 2821 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Pub. L. 116-92), the Contractor shall not use in the performance of this contract any energy sourced from inside the Russian Federation as a means of generating the furnished energy for the covered military installation unless a waiver is approved. The prohibition—

(1) Applies to all forms of energy that are furnished to a covered military installation; and

(2) Does not apply to energy converted by a third party into another form of energy and not directly delivered to a covered military installation.

(c) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in subcontracts and other commercial instruments that are for furnished energy at a covered military installation, including subcontracts and commercial instruments for commercial products .

(End of clause)

[86 FR 48339, Aug. 30, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 6593, Jan. 31, 2023]
#### In the Matter of Wallace B.O., Respondent, v Christine S.-O., Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 843]

from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Frank S. Cook, J.), entered December 30, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, determined that respondent is responsible for 90% of the fees of the guardian ad litem ($5,977.80) for services rendered in the underlying proceeding and for 50% of the fees of the guardian ad litem ($3,597.46) for services rendered on two prior appeals.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Family Court. Present—Gorski, J.E, Martoche, Centra, Lunn and Green, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
  WRITTEN
    STATEMENT
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    (i)
    the Companys Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and  (ii)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.   Henri
    Courpron
     Frederick
    S. Cromer
   105
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral

estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th

Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

DEC 3 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARY FRANCES BENNETT, also

known as Freonia Hampton, also

known as Mary Deal,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-6063

(D.C. No. CR-89-132-R)

(Western District of Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BALDOCK, MCKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

Defendant, Mary Frances Bennett, was charged in an 11 count indictment

of various drug and drug-related violations involving cocaine base and

phencyclidine, as well as the carrying of a firearm while drug trafficking in

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 856(a)(2), and 18 U.S.C. §
- 2 -

924(c)(1). Following a four-day trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty on all

counts. We affirmed that conviction. United States v. Bennett, 930 F.2d 35 (10th

Cir. 1991). 

Several years later, defendant filed a motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure challenging the trial court’s jurisdiction in

criminal cases. Citing 18 U.S.C. § 3231, under which the district courts of the

United States “have original jurisdiction . . . of all offenses against the laws of

the United States,” the district court denied the motion as “obviously frivolous.” 

See Appellant’s Br., Ex. C.

Ms. Bennett was, and remains, adamant that her motion was filed pursuant

to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 60(b), however, has

no application whatever to criminal matters. We would typically be inclined to

construe Ms. Bennett’s pro se motion liberally, see Riddle v. Mondragon, 83 F.3d

1197, 1202 (10th Cir. 1996), as one filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which

provides an appropriate means to raise collateral challenges to jurisdiction. But

Ms. Bennett’s motion states unequivocally that it is not to be construed as a

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, an insistence firmly maintained on appeal. We

must therefore find that the appellant was, and is, aware of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and

has specifically chosen not to invoke its provisions.
- 3 -

Because the rules of civil procedure cannot provide Ms. Bennett with the

relief she seeks, the order of the district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall

issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
### Atrazine

**Atrazine: :**  **Frequency of Monitoring in CWS Frequency of Monitoring in CWS**  **Melanie Biscoe Melanie Biscoe**  **to: dan.campbell**  **12/14/2010 12:00 PM**

**Dear Dan,**
**OPP does not intend to request any changes to the frequency of sampling in these systems in 2011. Although OPP is not requesting any changes to the sampling frequency in CWSs for 2011, we certainly**  **would not oppose any voluntary action Syngenta may take in 2011 to shorten the times between sampling periods in select CWS to inform work on the issue of sampling frequency . As such, OPP would leave it to**  **Syngenta's discretion to determine how and in which CWSs such voluntary work would be conducted .**

**Thanks very much for your willingness to discuss such measures with the Agency . Should Syngenta shorten sampling timeframes in a voluntary effort to refine issues surrounding sampling frequency , OPP**  **would look forward to seeing the findings.**

**Best Regards,**

**Melanie Biscoe Chemical Review Manager**  **Risk Management and Implementation Branch IV (RMIB IV) Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (PRD)**  **Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) biscoe.melanie@epa.gov**  **703-305-7106**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Flava Works, Inc

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05084

Honorable George W. Lindberg

Anwar Ogiste

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, August 22, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable George W. Lindberg: Motion hearing regarding

plaintiff's motion for default judgment [6] set for 9/12/2012 at 10:00 a.m. is reset to

9/19/2012 at 10:00 a.m. No court appearance is required on 9/12/2012. Mailed

notice(meg, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05084 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:45
## Key Staff

|  | **Jessica Lugg**Telephone: 202-987-1914E-Mail: Jessica.Lugg@ed.gov
Mailing Address:

U.S. Department of Education, OPE      International and Foreign Language Education      Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) Program      400 Maryland Avenue, S.W.      Washington, DC 20202

Fax:

(202) 453-5780

IFLE Home
  Last Modified: 04/20/2023 |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 9 

Recognizing the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. Marshall Museum and Library. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2017 

Mr. KAINE (for himself and Mr. WARNER) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the George C. Marshall Museum and George 

C. Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, 

as the National George C. Marshall Museum and Library. 

Whereas General George C. Marshall served as Army Chief 

of Staff during World War II, Special Ambassador to 

China, Secretary of State, and Secretary of Defense; 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was promoted to General of the Army in 1944, one of only five Army five-star 

generals in the history of the United States; 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 1946 for his military strategy 

and vital role during World War II; 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 9 IS 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Nobel 

Peace Prize in 1953 for developing the European economic recovery strategy known as the Marshall Plan; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation was established 

in 1953 and is devoted to preserving the legacy of General George C. Marshall through educational scholarship 

programs and facilities; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation opened the 

George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library in 1964 in Lexington, Virginia, on the 

post of the Virginia Military Institute, which is the alma 

mater of General George C. Marshall; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Museum educates the public 

about the military and diplomatic contributions of General George C. Marshall through extensive exhibits; and 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Research Library maintains 

the most comprehensive collection of records documenting 

the life and leadership of General George C. Marshall: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes the George C. Mar3 shall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library 

4 in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. Mar5 shall Museum and Library. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### 223.7300 Definition.

*Legacy system,* as used in this subpart, means any program that has passed Milestone A in the defense acquisition management system, as defined in DoD Instruction 5000.02.
#### 252.232-7000 Advance payment pool.

As prescribed in 232.412-70(a), use the following clause:

# Advance Payment Pool (APR 2020)

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this contract, advance payments will be made for contract performance in accordance with the Determinations, Findings, and Authorization for Advance payment dated ______________.

(b) Payments made in accordance with this clause shall be governed by the terms and conditions of the Advance Payment Pool Agreement between the United States of America and *[insert the name of the Contractor]”*. The Agreement is incorporated in the contract by reference.

(c) When a letter of credit has not been issued to the Contractor in conjunction with the contract, payment will be by a dual payee Treasury check made payable to the Contractor or the disbursing office in the Advance Payment Pool Agreement and will be forwarded to that disbursing office for appropriate disposition.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 85 FR 19700, Apr. 8, 2020]
Publications

Go back to Acknowledgements

Burrough, P. A. 1986. Methods of data analysis and spatial modelling. In P. H. T. Beckett (editor), Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment, 3rd edition, p. 81-101. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

Cowen, D. J. 1994. The importance of GIS for the average person. In GIS in Government: The federal perspective, p. 7-11. GIS World, Inc., Fort Collins, CO.

Dobson, J. E., E. A. Bright, R. L. Ferguson, D. W. Field, L. L. Wood, K. D. Haddad, H. Iredale III, J. R. Jensen, V. V. Klemas, R. J. Orth, J. P. Thomas. 1995. NOAA coastal change analysis program (C-CAP): Guidance for regional implementation. U.S. Dept. Comm., NOAA Tech. Rept. NMFS 123, 92 p.

Fulton, L. A. 1968. Spawning areas and abundance of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Columbia River Basin--past and present. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish. No. 618, 37 p.

Jennings, M. D., E. Brackney, P. Crist, and B. Sorbel 1996. Gap analysis program status report: 1994 and 1995 fiscal years. National Gap Analysis Program, 530 S. Asbury, Suite 1, Moscow, ID 83843, 158 p.

Konkel, G. W., and J. D. McIntyre. 1987. Trends in spawning populations of Pacific anadromous salmonids. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Res. Rep. 9, 24 p.

Nehlsen, W., J. E. Williams, and J. A. Lichatowich. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: Stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries (Bethesda) 16(2):4-21.

Simenstad, C. A., L. F. Small, C. D. McIntire, D. A. Jay, and C. Sherwood. 1990. Columbia River Estuary studies: An introduction to the estuary, a brief history, and prior studies. Prog. Oceanogr. 25:1-3.

WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife) and ODFW (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife). 1994. Status report: Columbia River fish runs and fisheries, 1938-1993. Oregon Dept. Fish Wildl., and Wash. Dept. Fish. Wildl., Clackamas, OR or Battleground, WA, 271 p.

The Wilderness Society. 1993. Pacific salmon and Federal lands: a regional analysis. Internal Report, The Wilderness Society, 610 S.W. Alder, Suite 915 ,Portland, OR 97205-361087, pages + app. OR)

Wahle, R. J., and R. E. Pearson. 1987. A listing of spawning streams and hatcheries producing chinook and coho salmon with estimates on numbers of spawners and data on hatchery releases. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS F/NWC-122, 109 p.

Waples, R. S. 1991. Definition of "species" under the Endangered Species Act : application to Pacific salmon. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo NMFS F/NWC-194, 29 p.

Go on to Appendix A

Table of Contents
245.302 Contracts with foreign governments or international organizations. ( 1 ) *General.* ( i ) *Approval.* A contractor may use Government property on work for foreign governments and international organizations only when approved in writing by the contracting officer having cognizance of the property. The contracting officer may grant approval, provided— ( A ) The use will not interfere with foreseeable requirements of the United States;
( B ) The work is undertaken as a DoD foreign military sale; or
( C ) For a direct commercial sale, the foreign country or international organization would be authorized to contract with the department concerned under the Arms Export Control Act.
( ii ) *Use charges.* ( A ) The Use and Charges clause is applicable on direct commercial sales to foreign governments or international organizations.
( B ) When a particular foreign government or international organization has funded the acquisition of property, do not assess the foreign government or international organization rental charges or nonrecurring recoupments for the use of such property.
( 2 ) *Special tooling and special test equipment.* ( i ) DoD normally recovers a fair share of nonrecurring costs of special tooling and special test equipment by including these costs in its calculation of the nonrecurring cost recoupment charge when major defense equipment is sold by foreign military sales or direct commercial sales to foreign governments or international organizations. “Major defense equipment” is defined in DoD Directive 2140.2, Recoupment of Nonrecurring Costs on Sales of U.S. Items, as any item of significant military equipment on the United States Munitions List having a nonrecurring research, development, test, and evaluation cost of more than $50 million or a total production cost of more than $200 million.
( ii ) When the cost thresholds in paragraph (2)(i) of this section are not met, the contracting officer shall assess rental charges for use of special tooling and special test equipment pursuant to the Use and Charges clause if administratively practicable.
( 3 ) *Waivers.* ( i ) Rental charges for use of U.S. production and research property on commercial sales transactions to the Government of Canada are waived for all commercial contracts. This waiver is based on an understanding wherein the Government of Canada has agreed to waive its rental charges.
( ii ) Requests for waiver or reduction of charges for the use of Government property on work for foreign governments or international organizations shall be submitted to the contracting officer, who is authorized to approve the requests in consultation with the appropriate functional specialist.
[74 FR 37647, July 29, 2009, as amended at 78 FR 65220, Oct. 31, 2013]
#### 2452.237-81 Labor categories, unit prices per hour and payment.

As prescribed in 2437.110(e)(6), insert the following clause in all indefinite quantity and requirements solicitations and contracts when level of effort task orders will be issued.

# Labor Categories, Unit Prices Per Hour and Payment (MAR 2016)

The contractor shall provide the following types of labor at the corresponding unit price per hour in accordance with the terms of this contract:

The unit price per hour is inclusive of the hourly wage plus any applicable labor overhead, General and Administrative (G&A) expenses, and profit. Payment shall be made to the contractor upon delivery to, and acceptance by, the Government office requesting services. The total amounts billed shall be derived by multiplying the actual number of hours worked per category by the corresponding price per hour.

(End of clause)

[81 FR 13754, Mar. 15, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,596,031
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,546,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     43,155,031
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (30,728,729)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,546,956
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,640,362
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               673,882
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,729,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,236,609
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,236,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                772,571
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,009,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    58.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    58.38
        

</TABLE>
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 48 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1551, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following corrections: 

5 (1) Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘An Act 

6 to modernize copyright law, and for other pur7 poses.’’. 

8 (2) In section 1(a), strike ‘‘Orrin G. Hatch’’ 

9 and insert ‘‘Orrin G. Hatch–Bob Goodlatte’’. 

Passed the Senate September 25, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 48 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

1551. to make corrections in the enrollment of H.R.
#### 2452.216-71 Award fee.

As prescribed in 2416.406(e)(2), insert the following clause in all fixed-price-award-fee contracts:

# Award Fee (FEB 2006)

In addition to the fixed-price for this contract set forth in the Schedule, a maximum award fee of $[insert amount] is available for payment. The government shall make payments of the award fee in accordance with the schedule established in the Performance Evaluation Plan and the Evaluation Period(s) set forth in the Distribution of Award Fee clause.

(End of clause)

[71 FR 2438, Jan. 13, 2006]