alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Overview | Guidelines | **Information Correction Requests and Appeals** | Contact

## Information Correction Requests and Appeals

**Submit a Request or Appeal.**

### FY 2019

**Information Correction Request from Wentworth Institute of Technology**

- Correction Request to the Director, Information Collection Clearance Division dated December 19, 2018 ( PDF , 153 KB)

**Information Correction Appeal from National Student Legal Defense Network**

- Correction Appeal to the Director, Information Collection Clearance Division dated July 12, 2019 ( PDF , 1,593 KB)
- Appeal of IQA Challenge dated July 31, 2019 ( PDF , 300 KB)
- Exhibit A – ED Guidelines ( PDF , 661 KB)
- Exhibit B – Student Defense Petition with Exhibits dated September 5, 2018 ( PDF , 2,670 KB)
- Exhibit D –  Department Response to Petition  dated July 1, 2019.
-  ED Response to National Student Legal Defense Network dated May 18, 2021 ( PDF , 190K)

### FY 2018

**Information Correction Appeal from the National Center for Youth Law**

-  Correction Request to Acting Director Tomakie Washington submitted by the National Center for Youth Law dated June 27, 2018 ( PDF , 464K)
-  U.S. Department of Education’s Response – Denial of Request dated August 23, 2018 ( PDF , 853K)
- 	Appeal Letter to Acting Chief Privacy Officer Arrington submitted by the National Center for Youth Law dated October 4, 2018 ( PDF , 376K)
-  U.S. Department of Education’s Response ( PDF  ( signed ), 1.03MB)
- Appeal Letter submitted by the National Center for Youth Law dated December 14, 2018 ( 12.14.18 Letter.pdf , 373KB)
-  Department’s Response dated February 25, 2019 ( Department Response to 12.14.18 Letter.pdf , 210KB)

**Information Correction Request from Ridley-Lowell Business & Technical Institute**

-  Correction Request to OM Information Quality dated March 12, 2018 ( PDF , 178K)
-  ED Response to Ridley-Lowell Business & Technical Institute dated April 23, 2018 ( PDF , 215K)

**Information Correction Request from National Student Legal Defense Network**

-  Correction Request to Director, Information Collection Clearance Division dated September 5, 2018 ( PDF , 769K)
-  ED Response to National Student Legal Defense Network dated September 10, 2018 ( PDF , 141K)

### FY 2017

MS Excel
PDF

### FY 2016

-   Report on Requests for Corrections Received (0 requests) (  PDF , 24 KB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Flava Works, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01888

Honorable John Z. Lee

Kywan Fisher

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 16, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable John Z. Lee: For the reasons provided herein,

the Court grants Flava Works, Inc.'s motion for attorney's fees and costs [23]. The Court

grants Flava Works motion for attorney's fees in the amount of 36;9,390.00. The Court

also grants Flava Works' motion for costs in the amount of $405.00 for the filing fee and

the fees for service of the summons and subpoena, as stated in the Courts 1/24/13 docket

entry. [For further detail see separate order.] Mailed notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 28 Filed: 04/16/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:176
#### Moore *v.*Jackson.

November 20, 1912.

Trover. Before Judge Walker. Green'e superior court. August 17, 1911.

*Brown & Shipp*and *Joseph P. Brown,*for plaintiff in error.

*Noel P. Parle,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial involve legal principles which require discussion; a number of them depend on the applicability of certain charges to the pleadings and evidence; and while there may have been some inaccuracies, under the pleadings and evidence there is nothing which requires a reversal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                             709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       94
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         17
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   803
<PP&E>                                             719
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (176)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,477
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,580
<SALES>                                            116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   116
<CGS>                                               25
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       25
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (672)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (672)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Charles W. Fischer,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
       ended  September  30,  2008 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
       Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
       1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
       Company.




Date:  October 30, 2008

                                     /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Charles W. Fischer
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### 247.270 Stevedoring contracts.
The Office of the Deputy Secretary, under the leadership of the Deputy Secretary, assists the Secretary in the discharge of Secretarial duties and responsibilities. The Deputy Secretary serves as Acting Secretary in the absence of the Secretary. The Deputy Secretary focuses on the development and implementation of policies, programs, and activities relating to elementary and secondary education matters. This mission addresses a wide spectrum of interests ranging from safe and drug free schools, special education and rehabilitative services, to the education of students living in poverty and students with linguistically and culturally diverse backgrounds, and the promotion of educational reforms.

The Deputy Secretary also has responsibility for the conduct of the intergovernmental relations of the Department in accordance with 20 U.S.C. 3412(a) (2) (A), the Department of Education Organization Act, as amended.

Events

**Innovation Exchange 2015**
217.7404-6 Allowable profit. When the final price of a UCA is negotiated after a substantial portion of the required performance has been completed, the head of the contracting activity shall ensure the profit allowed reflects— ( a ) Any reduced cost risk to the contractor for costs incurred during contract performance before negotiation of the final price. However, if a contractor submits a qualifying proposal to definitize a UCA, and the contracting officer for such action definitizes the contract after the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date on which the contractor submitted the qualifying proposal, the profit allowed on the contract shall accurately reflect the cost risk of the contractor as such risk existed on the date the contractor submitted the qualifying proposal;
( b ) Any reduced cost risk to the contractor for costs expected to be incurred during performance of the remainder of the contract after negotiation of the final price; and
( c ) The requirements at 215.404-71-3(d)(2). The risk assessment shall be documented in the price negotiation memorandum.
[74 FR 37650, July 29, 2009, as amended at 83 FR 30586, June 29, 2018; 84 FR 39206, Aug. 9, 2019]
#### 252.217-7026 Identification of Sources of Supply.

As prescribed in 217.7303, use the following provision:

# Identification of Sources of Supply (JAN 2023)

(a) The Government is required under [10 U.S.C. 4753](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/10/4753) to obtain certain information on the actual manufacturer or sources of supplies it acquires.

(b) The apparently successful Offeror agrees to complete and submit the following table before award:

Table

| Line items | National stock No. | Commercial item (Y or N) | Source of supply | | | Actual mfg? |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Company | Address | Part No. |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| \_\_\_\_\_\_ | \_\_\_\_\_\_ | \_\_\_\_\_\_ | \_\_\_\_\_\_ | \_\_\_\_\_\_ | \_\_\_\_\_\_ | \_\_\_\_\_\_ |
| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (1) List each deliverable item of supply and item of technical data. | | | | | | |
| (2) If there is no national stock number, list “none”.; | | | | | | |
| (3) Use “Y” if the item is a commercial product or commercial service; otherwise use “N.” If “Y” is listed, the Offeror need not complete the remaining columns in the table. | | | | | | |
| (4) For items of supply, list all sources. For technical data, list the source. | | | | | | |
| (5) For items of supply, list each source's part number for the item. | | | | | | |
| (6) Use “Y” if the source of supply is the actual manufacturer; “N” if it is not; and “U” if unknown. | | | | | | |

(End of provision)

[[56 FR 36479](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/56-FR-36479), July 31, 1991, as amended at [59 FR 27675](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/59-FR-27675), May 27, 1994; [60 FR 61601](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-61601), Nov. 30, 1995; [87 FR 76997](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/87-FR-76997), Dec. 16, 2022; [88 FR 6591](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/88-FR-6591), Jan. 31, 2023]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES CELLULAR 

CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HOTLINE WIRELESS & MORE, INC. 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 1:12-cv-05017 

UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR 

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S. Cellular”), by and through its attorneys, hereby 

respectfully moves the Court for a temporary restraining order enjoining Hotline Wireless & 

More, Inc. (“Hotline Wireless”), its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those 

persons acting in concert or participation or privity with Hotline Wireless from advertising, 

promoting, distributing, displaying, or using U.S. Cellular’s trademark or confusingly similar 

marks or otherwise representing that they are an authorized U.S. Cellular agent or affiliated with 

U.S. Cellular in any way. 

This Motion should be granted for all the reasons explained in the contemporaneously 

filed Memorandum In Support of United States Cellular Corporations’s Motion For Temporary 

Restraining Order. 

Date: June 25, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 

UNITED STATES CELLULAR 

CORPORATION 

By: /s/ Robert D. Leighton 

Case: 1:12-cv-05017 Document #: 5 Filed: 06/25/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:23
 2 

 One of Its Attorneys 

Richard J. O’Brien 

Robert D. Leighton 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

One South Dearborn Street 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Telephone: (312) 853-7000 

 

Case: 1:12-cv-05017 Document #: 5 Filed: 06/25/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:24
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Robert D. Leighton, an attorney, hereby certifies that he effected service by placing the 

foregoing document with a special process server for hand delivery and mailing a copy of the 

same via First Class Mail to: 

Hotline Wireless & More, Inc. 

c/o Amer Hijazi, Registered Agent and President 

3938 W. Roosevelt Road 

Chicago, IL 60624 

On this 25th day of June, 2012. 

/s/ Robert D. Leighton 

Robert D. Leighton 

CH1 6903188 

Case: 1:12-cv-05017 Document #: 5 Filed: 06/25/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:25
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:131
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:132
Case: 1:12-cv-04675 Document #: 8 Filed: 08/09/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:133
Case: 1:12-cv-04056 Document #: 7 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:33
Case: 1:12-cv-04056 Document #: 7 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:34
#### 232.7000 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for submitting and processing payment requests in electronic form to comply with 10 U.S.C. 4601.

[68 FR 8455, Feb. 21, 2003, as amended at 87 FR 76995, Dec. 16, 2022]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Civil Case No. 1:12-cv-04676

)

v. )

)

JOHN DOES 1-50, )

)

Defendants. )

)

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOES 8, 27, 28, 

29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiff hereby voluntary dismisses John Does 8, 27, 28, 

29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44 (“Defendants”) from this 

action without prejudice. Defendants were assigned the IP addresses 24.15.154.34, 108.197.1.42, 

108.224.153.6, 108.233.141.1, 108.69.167.201, 108.80.234.13, 64.108.197.155, 69.211.3.81, 

75.25.60.179, 75.5.64.91, 75.56.54.130, 75.63.54.24, 75.63.61.147, 76.222.56.219, 

76.223.247.57, 99.135.92.71, 99.158.172.82, 99.48.58.175 and 216.104.32.43, respectively. For 

the avoidance of doubt, Plaintiff is not voluntarily dismissing any other Defendant.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendants have neither answered Plaintiff’s 

Complaint nor filed a motion for summary judgment. 

Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 24 Filed: 03/26/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:203
2

Dated: March 26, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

NICOLETTI & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti, Esq. (P44419)

36880 Woodward Ave, Suite 100

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Tel: (248) 203-7800

Fax: (248) 203-7801

E-Fax: (248) 928-7051

Email: paul@nicoletti-associates.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 26, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of 

record and interested parties through this system. 

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti, Esq. (P44419)

Case: 1:12-cv-04676 Document #: 24 Filed: 03/26/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:204
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A2 for the year ending
February 29, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alex Trevino, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Alex Trevino, Jr.Alex Trevino, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerMay 31, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

** **

I, John R. Howe, Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer of The Cato Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

 

1.    theForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended May 1, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of the Company.

Dated:June 9, 2010

|   |                     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | /s/ John R. Howe         |
|   | John R. Howe             |
|   | Executive Vice President |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

 

----
Exhibit 23.1

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

PhotoMedex, Inc. and Subsidiaries: 

 

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-58450, 333-72580, 333-91926 and 333-106605) on Form S-3, in the registration statement (No. 333-100609) on Form S-4, and in the registration statement (No. 333-30298) on FormS-8 of PhotoMedex, Inc. of our report dated February 18, 2004, except with respect to the third paragraph of note 8, as to which the date is March 10, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PhotoMedex, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of PhotoMedex, Inc.

 

Our report refers to our audit of the adjustments that were applied to revisethe 2001 consolidated financial statements, as more fully described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statements other thanwith respect to such adjustments. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 12, 2004
#### 225.900-70 Definition.

“Component,” as used in this subpart, means any item supplied to the Government as part of an end product or of another component.

[74 FR 68383, Dec. 24, 2009]
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Albert F. Eckert. (Don O. Cummings, Esq.) (B) The People of the State of New York v. Henry Lee Hines. (Vincent A. Ange, Esq.) (C) The People of the State of New York v. Cornelius Askew. (Carlo M. Perfetto, Esq.) (D) Richard F. Miller, Appellant, v. Kenneth Ward, Respondent. (E) The People of the State of New York v. Albert F. Eckert. (Philip Engelder, Esq., in place of Don O. Cummings, Esq.)

[In each action] Order of substitution of attorneys entered.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Christopher V Langone

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02073

Honorable John A. Nordberg

Patrick Kaiser

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, May 30, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable John A. Nordberg: Status hearing held on

5/30/2012. Status hearing set for 6/13/2012 at 2:30 PM. Mailed notice(tlp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02073 Document #: 5 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:26