alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016363EN.01002101.xml

| 1.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/21

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 September 2016

(2016/C 363/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1161 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4513 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86103 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6210 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0876 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9865 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,79 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3192 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4537 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3576 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4657 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4690 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6547 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5369 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5235 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 229,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5238 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4463 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5220 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 566,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6148 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,015 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,5140 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,695 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6210 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,7389 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,3655 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1161

JPY

Japanese yen

113,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4513

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86103

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6210

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0876

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9865

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,79

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3192

RON

Romanian leu

4,4537

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3576

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4657

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4690

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6547

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5369

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5235

KRW

South Korean won

1 229,76

ZAR

South African rand

15,5238

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4463

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5220

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 566,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6148

PHP

Philippine peso

54,015

RUB

Russian rouble

70,5140

THB

Thai baht

38,695

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6210

MXN

Mexican peso

21,7389

INR

Indian rupee

74,3655

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6952** 

BRIAN P. ENGEL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , Senior District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00586

- JRS )

Submitted : October 8, 2014 Decided: October 15, 2014

Before SHEDD and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Brian P
. Engel, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Theresa Armstrong, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Brian P. Engel seek s to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of a ppealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable ju rists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on proced ural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the r ecord and conclude that Engel has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materi als before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**3D version**  **(Watts) Settings** **2D to 3D**

**(Watts) Settings**  **2D**

**(Watts) Settings**  **3D**

**version (Watts)**  135.0 Cinema 134.8 Cinema 132.3 Cinema 134.2 135.6 Cinema 135.6 Cinema 93.4 Standard 135.5 312.3 Cinema 312.9 Cinema 169.7 Cinema 426.2 311.7 Cinema 314.7 Cinema 167.5 Cinema 425.2
88.2 Brilliant 89.1 Brilliant 112.4 Brilliant 95.8

88.7 Brilliant 91.6 Brilliant 110.2 Brilliant 95.3
138.36 Standard 138.43 Standard 111.1 Standard 138.54Standard ** Standard 112.14 Standard n/a Standard 138.14Standard n/a Standard 364.8 Standard 365.7 Standard 210.48 Standard 364.8 Standard 366.9 Standard 213.66 Standard n/a Standard 367.6 Standard n/a Standard
**This configuration of player, TV, and disc, does not perform the requested test. The left eye content is displayed on one side of the screen and the right eye is displayed on the other. **TV A 52" LED Backlit**  **TV B 54" Plasma** 

**TV C 32" LED Backlit** 

**TV 1 40" LED Backlit**  **TV Home**  

## Television 3D Mode

**TV 11 63" Plasma** 

The Television 3D Mode Data contains TV energy consumption data as to TV energy consumption while in various 3D modes. This testing was conducted on five TVs under the following modes:: including when the TV is displaying a 3D video signal, when the TV is up-converting a 2D video signal to 3D, and when the TV is receiving a video signal from a Blu-ray player that has up-converted a 2D video signal to 3D. **Note:**TV A switched to Vivid mode when in 2D and connected to Blu-Ray Player 2

**Note:**TV C had more energy consumption in 2D than in 3D**Settings 2D to 3D**  **(Watts) Settings**  **2D**

**(Watts) Settings** 

Cinema 134.1 Cinema 131.7 Cinema Blu-Ray Player 1 0.09% Cinema 135.3 Cinema 156.5 Vivid Blu-Ray Player 2 0.00% Vivid 426.9 Vivid 424.7 Vivid Blu-Ray Player 1 -0.20% Vivid 413.0 Vivid 424.5 Vivid Blu-Ray Player 2 -0.96% Super Brilliant 95.7 Super

Brilliant 111.3 Super

Brilliant Blu-Ray Player 1 -1.01% Super Brilliant 96.8 Super

Brilliant 110.3 Super

Brilliant Blu-Ray Player 2 -3.31%
140.34 DynamicBlu-Ray Player 2 -0.05% 141.86 DynamicBlu-Ray Player 1 N/A n/a Dynamic TV Conversion N/A 395.96 DynamicBlu-Ray Player 2 -0.25% 398.22 DynamicBlu-Ray Player 1 -0.58% n/a Dynamic TV Conversion N/A
**This configuration of player, TV, and disc, does not perform the requested test. The left eye content is displayed on one side of the screen and the right eye is displayed on the other. Not Applicable**Retail Blu-Ray Player**  **Percent Difference Home (3D/2D to 3D)** 

Not Applicable

The Television 3D Mode Data contains TV energy consumption data as to TV energy consumption while in various 3D modes. This testing was conducted on five TVs under the following modes:: including when the TV is displaying a 3D video signal, when the TV is up-converting a 2D video signal to 3D, and when the TV is0.10% 2.04% 1.95%

0.10% 45.20% -13.46% -0.17% 83.98% 0.34% 2.87% 86.04% 0.17%
0.05% -21.47%-13.99%

-1.60% -19.51%-13.63% N/A 24.58% N/A N/A 23.54% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 73.32% N/A N/A 70.74% N/A N/A N/A N/A **Percent Increase**  **from 2D to 3D**  **Percent Difference Retail (3D/2D to 3D)** **Percent**

**Increase from 2D**  **to 3D**
#### 25.902 Procedures.

For regulations governing importations and duties, see the Customs Regulations issued by the U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury (19 CFR Chapter 1). Except as provided elsewhere in the Customs Regulations (see 19 CFR 10.100), all shipments of imported supplies purchased under Government contracts are subject to the usual Customs entry and examination requirements. Unless the agency obtains an exemption (see 25.903), those shipments are also subject to duty.
# C_2016420EN.01000101.xml

| 15.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 420/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 420/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 November 2016

(2016/C 420/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0777 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4425 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85985 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8095 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0739 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,026 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4060 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5183 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,5478 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4276 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4590 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3607 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5193 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5259 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 263,99 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5062 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3759 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5105 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 395,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6870 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,993 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,6148 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,226 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7153 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,5024 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,0800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0777

JPY

Japanese yen

116,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4425

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85985

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8095

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0739

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,026

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4060

RON

Romanian leu

4,5183

TRY

Turkish lira

3,5478

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4276

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4590

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3607

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5193

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5259

KRW

South Korean won

1 263,99

ZAR

South African rand

15,5062

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3759

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5105

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 395,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6870

PHP

Philippine peso

52,993

RUB

Russian rouble

71,6148

THB

Thai baht

38,226

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7153

MXN

Mexican peso

22,5024

INR

Indian rupee

73,0800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
22.1016 Statement of equivalent rates for Federal hires. ( a ) The statement required under the clause at 52.222-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires, (see 22.1006(b)) shall set forth those wage rates and fringe benefits that would be paid by the contracting activity to the various classes of service employees expected to be utilized under the contract if 5 U.S.C. 5332 (General Schedule—white collar) and/or 5 U.S.C. 5341 (Wage Board—blue collar) were applicable.
( b ) Procedures for computation of these rates are as follows: ( 1 ) Wages paid blue collar employees shall be the basic hourly rate for each class. The rate shall be Wage Board pay schedule step two for nonsupervisory service employees and step three for supervisory service employees.
( 2 ) Wages paid white collar employees shall be an hourly rate for each class. The rate shall be obtained by dividing the general pay schedule step one biweekly rate by 80.
( 3 ) Local civilian personnel offices can assist in determining and providing grade and salary data.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2003 of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alex Trevino, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    ALEX TREVINO,
JR.Alex Trevino, Jr.Chief Executive Officer




May 29, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

m 99-20879

_______________

HANS HEINRICH TITTUS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AGENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF

THE INVESTORS OF BLUELAKE WORLD, S.A.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS, N.A.,

AND

NATIONSSECURITIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-2687)

_________________________

July 14, 2000

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE,

Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have reviewed the briefs and applicable

portions of the record and have heard the

arguments of counsel. We conclude that the

district court was correct in entering summary

judgment on all tort and contract claims

asserted. The judgment, accordingly, is

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited

(continued...)

*(...continued)

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2

AFFIRMED.
Order entered November 18, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00073 - CV IN THE ESTATE OF IRA E. TOBOLOWSKY, DECE ASED

On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dal las County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 18 - 17620



### O RDER Befo re the Court is appellant ’s November 14, 2019 unopposed motion for extension of time to file its reply brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s reply brief be filed no later than Dec ember 9, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
**Exhibit 31.2****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Mark A. Severson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Camco Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of Camco as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. Camco’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d15(f))for Camco and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Camco, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of Camco’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluations; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in Camco’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Camco’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Camco’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.5. Camco’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Camco’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Camco’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  August 4, 2006 By:  /s/ Mark A. Severson    Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer
Chart 1115AHOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       1115A          Edition:       43          Edition       Date:       11/1/2008          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/22/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                                                    
|Paul R. Flanders Vice President  Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer November 9, 2007
No. 47,136

#### Washington Avenue Investments, Inc., Appellee, v. The City of Kansas City, Kansas, and Board of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas, *Appellants.*

(515 P. 2d 744)

Opinion filed November 3, 1973.

*Philip C. Lorton,*of Kansas City, was on the brief for the appellants.

*Donald W. Vasos,*of Scott, Daily & Vasos, of Kansas City, was on the brief for the appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

This is an action to recover damages caused by a utility pole which the defendants had erected over a lateral sewer line connecting plaintiff s property to the main sewer. It is alleged that the pole settled into the lateral sewer, causing it to crack and cave in, thereby blocking the flow of sewage and causing it to back up into plaintiffs rental property.

The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. The defendants have appealed, raising two points: (1) there was no evidence of negligence on their part and (2) the action was barred by the statute of limitations. (K. S. A. 1972 Supp. 60-513.)

After examining the record, we are of the opinion there was substantial competent evidence showing negligence on defendants’ part in locating, placing and maintaining the pole. A detailed recital of the evidence would add nothing of value to the body of our law and will not be attempted. Where there is substantial competent evidence to support the verdict it must be upheld. *(Brohan v. Nafziger,*206 Kan. 58, 476 P. 2d 649.)

The petition does not disclose on its face that plaintiffs cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations, nor is the statute pleaded by the defendants as a bar. Under these circumstances, the bar of the statute is not available to the defendants as a defense.

In *Mayfield v. Hesston Mfg. Co.,*187 Kan. 91, 97, 353 P. 2d 789, we stated:

> ". . . It is well settled that if a petition shows on its face the action is barred by the statute of limitations it is demurrable on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action . . . but the rule is equally well established *270that unless a petition shows that fact affirmatively no demurrer lies, and the bar of the statute must be pleaded to be available as a defense *(Kerr v. Robertson,*176 Kan. 637, 272 P. 2d 1062). . . .”

The trial court correctly rendered judgment for the plaintiff and its judgment is affirmed.