alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Earl L. Yager, as Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that:(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e)and 15(d)-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) paragraph omitted;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: June 29, 2006 /s/ Earl L. Yager   Earl L. Yager   Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 18 (Friday, January 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7550-7551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-397-000.
    Applicants: Stagecoach Pipeline & Storage Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Stagecoach Pipeline & Storage 
Company LLC--Filing of Tariff Modifications to be effective 2/22/2021.
    Filed Date: 1/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20210122-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/3/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-398-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Yankee Gas 
510802 Release eff 1-23-2021 to be effective 1/23/2021.
    Filed Date: 1/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20210122-5083.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/3/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered, 
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.


[[Page 7551]]


    Dated: January 25, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-01973 Filed 1-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### 1952.227-77 Rights in shop drawings.

As prescribed in 1927.405(h), insert the following clause:

# Rights in Shop Drawings (FEB 1985)

(a) Shop drawings for construction means drawings, submitted to the Government by the Construction Contractor, subcontractor or any lower tier subcontractor pursuant to a construction contract, showing in detail (i) the proposed fabrication and assembly of structural elements and (ii) the installation (i.e., form, fit, and attachment details) of materials or equipment. The Government may duplicate, use, and disclose in any manner and for any purpose shop drawings delivered under this contract.

(b) This clause, including this paragraph (b), shall be included in all subcontracts hereunder at any tier.

(End of clause)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Hawks
Industries, Inc. 1st Qtr. 1997 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015678
<NAME> HAWKS INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          54,000
<SECURITIES>                                   311,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  309,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               738,000
<PP&E>                                       4,329,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,108,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,417,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          794,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       270,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,930,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,417,000
<SALES>                                        533,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               545,000
<CGS>                                          504,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  625,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (77,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (77,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (77,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
#### Rachel Taylor v. Jason N. Robards, Jr.

Motion for leave to appeal from a determination of the Appellate Term denied, with $10 costs. We do not deny leave upon the ground that the case of *Danann Realty Corp.*v. *Harris*(5 N Y 2d 317) precludes the assertion of the defense of duress. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0452

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 9/16/13

Regional Airline Association 9/16/13

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 9/16/13

Airlines for America Joe White

Robert Ireland

9/16/13
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



The companies listed below are all of the subsidiaries of ACR Group, Inc. as of February 28, 2005. All of the companies are wholly-owned.



|                                     |  |                       
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                   |  | State of Incorporation
|ACR Supply, Inc.                     |  | Texas                 
|Total Supply, Inc.                   |  | Texas                 
|Valley Supply, Inc.                  |  | Texas                 
|Heating and Cooling Supply, Inc.     |  | Nevada                
|ETI Texas, Inc.                      |  | Tennessee             
|Florida Cooling Supply, Inc.         |  | Texas                 
|West Coast HVAC Supply, Inc.         |  | Texas                 
|Lifetime Filter, Inc.                |  | Texas                 
|Contractors Heating and Supply, Inc. |  | Texas                 
|CAC Distributors, Inc.               |  | Texas
Functional Statements > Federal Student Aid

## Table of Contents

- I. Mission and Responsibilities 
- II. Organization
- III. Order of Succession
- IV. Functions and Responsibilities of FSA Components
A. Immediate Office of the Chief Operating Officer
B. Office of Principal Deputy to the Chief Operating Officer
- B1. Acquisitions Directorate
- B2. Finance Directorate
- B3. Strategic Communications Directorate
- B4. Management Services Directorate
- B5. Enterprise Technology Directorate
C. NextGen FSA Program Office
D. Office of Student Experience and Aid Delivery (SEAD)
E. Office of Partner Participation and Oversight (PPO)
F. Office of Strategic Measures and Outcomes (SMO)
G. Office of Strategy, Innovation, and Transformation (SIT)

## Organizational Chart

FSA Org Chart (PDF, 112KB)

## Delegations of Authority

FSA Delegations of Authority may be found at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/or/delegations/fsa.html
#### 252.216-7007 Economic price adjustment—basic steel, aluminum, brass, bronze, or copper mill products-representation.

As prescribed in 216.203-4-70(a)(2), use the following provision:

# Economic Price Adjustment—Basic Steel, Aluminum, Brass, Bronze, or Copper Mill Products—Representation (MAR 2012)

(a) *Definitions.* The terms “established price” and “unit price,” as used in this provision, have the meaning given in the clause 252.216-7000, Economic Price Adjustment—Basic Steel, Aluminum, Brass, Bronze, or Copper Mill Products.

(b) By submission of its offer, the offeror represents that the unit price stated in this offer for ________________ (*Identify the item*) is not in excess of the offeror's established price in effect on the date set for opening of bids (or the contract date if this is to be a negotiated contract) for like quantities of the same item. This price is the net price after applying any applicable standard trade discounts offered by the offeror from its catalog, list, or schedule price.

(End of provision)

[77 FR 19131, Mar. 30, 2012]
#### 237.102-77 Acquisition requirements roadmap tool.

See PGI 237.102-77 for guidance on using the Acquisition Requirements Roadmap Tool to develop and organize performance requirements into draft versions of the performance work statement, the quality assurance surveillance plan, and the performance requirements summary.

[77 FR 52254, Aug. 29, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 36473, June 7, 2016]
No. 89-6800.

#### Borelli *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07555 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 07555\07555_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### x 07555\07555_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07555\07555_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07555\07555_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07555\07555_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07555\07555_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07555\07555_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07555\Supporting Documentation\07555_Arial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07555\Supporting Documentation\07555_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antonio Benoit, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lee Wilkinson, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 477]

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J), rendered December 12, 2005, convicting defendants, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing defendant Benoit to a term of 6V2 years, and sentencing defendant Wilkinson to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

*337The verdict as to each defendant was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Defendants’ acquittal of robbery in the first degree does not warrant a different conclusion *(see People v Ray am,*94 NY2d 557 [2000]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The evidence established that defendants acted in concert in shoplifting merchandise, and that as they left the store with the stolen goods, Benoit brandished an object and threatened a store security guard, thereby escalating the crime to a robbery *(see People v Sweeper,*281 AD2d 300 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 868 [2001]). Furthermore, the evidence supports the conclusion that both defendants aided each other in the forcible retention of the property *(see*Penal Law §§ 20.00, 160.10 [1]).

The court properly denied defendant Wilkinson’s motion to suppress identification testimony. The record supports the court’s finding that the lineup was not unduly suggestive. The police took effective measures to minimize any differences in appearances between Wilkinson and the lineup fillers, and Wilkinson was not singled out for identification *(see People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 833 [1990]).

Both defendants’ ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unreviewable on direct appeal because they involve matters outside the record concerning matters of trial strategy *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998 [1982]). On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that both Wilkinson and Benoit received effective assistance of counsel under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). With respect to each defendant, the actions of counsel challenged on appeal constituted reasonable strategic decisions that did not prejudice their respective clients.

Both defendants’ challenges to the court’s jury instructions and its responses to inquiries from the deliberating jury are unpreserved *(see People v Whalen,*59 NY2d 273, 280 [1983]; *People v Williams,*297 AD2d 565 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 566 [2002]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal.

We perceive no basis for reducing Benoit’s sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 186 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 186

 Recognizing the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as 
        the national aviation cadet museum of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2017

   Mr. Boozman (for himself and Mr. Cotton) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as 
        the national aviation cadet museum of the United States.

Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum was founded in 1994 by former aviation cadet 
        and Air Force First Lieutenant Errol Severe;
Whereas, from 1917 until 1965, the flying cadet and succeeding aviation cadet 
        programs served as the primary production source for nearly 500,000 
        joint service pilots, navigators, and bombardiers;
Whereas the bravery, courage, dedication, and heroism of aviators and supporting 
        ground crews from the Army Air Corps and the Army Air Forces were 
        critical factors in defeating the enemies of the United States during 
        World War I and World War II;
Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, is the only 
        museum in the United States that exists exclusively to preserve and 
        promote an understanding of the role of aviation cadets in the 20th 
        century; and
Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum is dedicated to--

    (1) celebrating the spirit of the United States; and

    (2) recognizing the teamwork, collaboration, patriotism, and courage of 
the men who trained for and fought in, as well as those individuals on the 
home front who mobilized and supported, the national aviation effort: Now, 
therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the Aviation Cadet Museum in 
Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as the national aviation cadet museum of the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Gem Credit Corporation, Respondent, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant.

Motion by appellant to enlarge time to perfect its appeal granted by default; time enlarged to the January 1961 Term, commencing January 3, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before December 9, 1960. The record should be promptly certified, or stipulated by the respective attorneys, or sworn to by one of appellant’s attorneys, as prescribed by rule and statute (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 234; Civ. Prac. Act. § 616, § 170, § 170-a). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
# C_2016392EN.01000101.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 392/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 383, 17.10.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 371, 10.10.2016

OJ C 364, 3.10.2016

OJ C 350, 26.9.2016

OJ C 343, 19.9.2016

OJ C 335, 12.9.2016

OJ C 326, 5.9.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 1903.602 Exceptions.

To avoid potential conflicts of interest or the appearance of preferential treatment, it is the Broadcasting Board of Governors policy not to award contracts, purchase orders, grants or cooperative agreements to Government employees or their family members or business concerns owned or controlled by Government employees or their family members. Exceptions to this policy must be approved by the Board Director or Board Procurement Executive and supported by written Findings and Determination. A contract with an employee for services may result in violation of the dual salary compensation statutes (5 U.S.C. 5533). Nothing in this paragraph is intended to render inapplicable the conflict of interest prohibition set out in 18 U.S.C. 208.
NO. 07-03-0230 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L C NOVEM BER 25, 2003

______________________________ JOHN W ELCH AND ANGELA W ELCH, APPELLANT V. UNITED SERVICES AUTO MOBILE ASSOCIATIO N, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 284 TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNT Y; NO. 02-03-01831-CV; HONORAB LE OLEN UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. MEM ORAN DUM OP INI ON On May 9, 2003, a copy of a Not ice of Appeal from a Sum mary Judgm ent in Cause No. 02-03-01831-CV in the 284t h District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, was f iled with the clerk of the Ninth Court of A ppe als. The Su m m ary Jud gm ent

w as s igne d on Ap ril 9, 2003.2

On June 17, 2003, t he trial cour t clerk’ s record was f

iled with the clerk of this court. There has not been a reporter’srecord filed. By letter dated Novem ber 4, 2003, appellant wasadvised that appellant’s brief had not been filed and that unless a m otion for extens ion of time to file the brief was received w ithin ten days, t he a ppe al w ould be s ubj ect

to d ism iss al. No response hasbeen received to the letter of Novem ber 4, 2003. Neither appellant’s brief nor a mot ion to extend tim e for filing the brief have been filed. This app eal is

dismissed. T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1). Costs are taxed to appellant. T EX . R. A PP . P. 43.4. Phil Johnson Chief Justi ce
#### 252.225-7060 Prohibition on Certain Procurements from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.

As prescribed in 225.7022-5(b), use the following clause:

## Prohibition on Certain Procurements From the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (Jun 2023)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Forced labor* means any work or service that is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty for nonperformance and that the worker does not offer to perform (10 U.S.C. 2496).

*XUAR* means the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People's Republic of China (10 U.S.C. 2496).

(b) *Prohibition.* In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 4661, none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available for DoD may be used to knowingly procure any products mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced labor from XUAR or from an entity that has used labor from within or transferred from XUAR. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to determine that forced labor from XUAR will not be used in the performance of this contract (section 855, Pub. L. 117-263).

(c) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall insert this clause, including this paragraph (c), without alteration other than to identify the appropriate parties, in subcontracts including subcontracts for commercial products, commercial services, and commercially available off-the-shelf items.

(End of clause)

[87 FR 76984, Dec. 16, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 6593, Jan. 31, 2023; 88 FR 37797, June 9, 2023]