alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CORVENGA LLC, )

)

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 12 C 04846

)

SPECTRA MEDICAL DEVICES, INC., )

)

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. )

SPECTRA’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A)

Plaintiff Corvenga, L.L.C. (“Corvenga”) brought breach of contract claims in this Court

against Defendant, Spectra Medical Devices, Inc. (“Spectra”), resulting from the purchase and

receipt of Spectra’s trademarked medical needles. Spectra subsequently answered and filed

numerous counterclaims, including counterclaims under Massachusetts law. Spectra now moves

for transfer to the District of Massachusetts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

Spectra respectfully moves to transfer of this case to the District of Massachusetts

because: (1) most, if not all, key party representatives and witnesses reside in Massachusetts,

resulting in expensive travel and logistical costs for both parties; (2) any documentary and

physical evidence is located in Massachusetts; (3) every material event – from the negotiations

regarding purchasing to actual delivery – occurred in Massachusetts; (4) the parties previously

established that Massachusetts law governs at least part of the contract at issue; (5) the subpoena

power of this Court is greatly diminished due to the distance between this Court and potential

witnesses residing in Massachusetts; (6) Spectra’s sole office is located in Massachusetts; and (7)

Corvenga dealt with Spectra in Massachusetts and Corvenga maintains a Massachusetts office.

As such, adjudicating this case in this Court is not only logistically and financially inconvenient

Case: 1:12-cv-04846 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/25/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:92
2

for both parties, but also will unfairly prejudice Spectra and unnecessarily burden this Court by

forcing it to familiarize itself with the laws of Massachusetts and shuffle its already crowded

docket.

WHEREFORE, for these reasons, and as set forth in Defendant Spectra’s Memorandum

in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue, and all other reasons which this Court may find

proper, Spectra respectfully requests that this case be transferred to the United States District

Court for the District of Massachusetts, and for such other relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

Respectfully submitted,

SPECTRA MEDICAL DEVICES, INC.,

Defendant

By: /s/ Kal K. Shah

Kal K. Shah (IL 6275895)

Emily L. Peel (IL 6290433)

Adam Wolek (IL 6301207)

THOMPSON COBURN LLP

55 E. Monroe Street, 37th Fl.

Chicago, IL 60603

(312)346-7500

Attorneys for Defendant

Garry Blank

Blank and Solomon

Garry N. Blank, Esq.

449 Rte. 130

Sandwich, MA 02563

(508) 888-5900

Of Counsel

Case: 1:12-cv-04846 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/25/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:93
# C_2016388EN.01000201.xml

| 21.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 October 2016

(2016/C 388/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0980 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4403 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89568 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7040 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0852 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9625 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,54 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3282 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5030 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3606 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4314 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4460 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5181 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5185 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5247 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 237,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2739 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3980 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 282,24 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5809 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,727 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,5407 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,408 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4629 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3810 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,3445 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0980

JPY

Japanese yen

113,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4403

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89568

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7040

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0852

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9625

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,54

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3282

RON

Romanian leu

4,5030

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3606

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4314

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4460

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5181

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5185

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5247

KRW

South Korean won

1 237,37

ZAR

South African rand

15,2739

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3980

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 282,24

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5809

PHP

Philippine peso

52,727

RUB

Russian rouble

68,5407

THB

Thai baht

38,408

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4629

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3810

INR

Indian rupee

73,3445

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 27 

Honoring the life and achievements of Eugene A. ‘‘Gene’’ Cernan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2017 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. NELSON, Mr. PETERS, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. INHOFE, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. GARDNER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and achievements of Eugene A. ‘‘Gene’’ 

Cernan. 

Whereas Gene Cernan was born on March 14, 1934, in Chicago, Illinois, was raised in the suburban towns of Bellwood and Maywood, and graduated from Proviso Township High School; 

Whereas Gene Cernan began his career as a basic flight 

trainee in the United States Navy; 

Whereas Gene Cernan was one of fourteen astronauts selected by NASA in October 1963 to participate in the 

Gemini and Apollo programs; 

Whereas Gene Cernan was the second American to have 

walked in space having spanned the circumference of the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 27 IS 

world twice in a little more than 21⁄2 hours in 1966 during the Gemini 9 mission; 

Whereas Gene Cernan served as the lunar module pilot for 

Apollo 10 in 1969, which was referred to as the ‘‘dress 

rehearsal’’ for Apollo 11’s historic landing on the Moon; 

Whereas Gene Cernan was commander of Apollo 17 in 1972, 

during the last human mission to the Moon; 

Whereas Gene Cernan maintains the distinction of being the 

last man to have left his footprints on the surface of the 

Moon; 

Whereas Gene Cernan was one of the three men to have 

flown to the Moon on two occasions; 

Whereas Gene Cernan logged 566 hours and 15 minutes in 

space, of which more than 73 hours were spent on the 

surface of the Moon; 

Whereas Gene Cernan and the crew of Apollo 17 set records 

that still stand today, for longest manned lunar landing 

flight, longest lunar surface extra vehicular activities, 

largest lunar sample return, and longest time in lunar 

orbit; 

Whereas Gene Cernan retired from the Navy after 20 years 

and ended his NASA career in July 1976; and 

Whereas, on January 16, 2016, Gene Cernan passed away in 

Houston, Texas, leaving behind a vibrant history of space 

exploration and advocacy for NASA, a legacy of inspiring 

young people to ‘‘dream the impossible’’, and a documentary that encourages continual human space exploration: 

Now, therefore, be it 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 27 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the life of Gene 

2 Cernan, a Naval aviator, fighter pilot, electrical engineer, 

3 and the last astronaut to walk on the Moon. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-16325) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Planof ACR Group, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-42701) pertaining to the registration of 2,411,667 shares of common stock of ACR Group, Inc., of our report dated May 13, 2004 (except for Notes 1, 2, 4 and 6 as to which the dateis October 11, 2004), with respect to the consolidated financial statements, as amended, and schedule of ACR Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended February 29, 2004. 

 

Houston, Texas 

October 14, 2004
E ffective Public Involv ement for Permitting in Indian C ountry

As the Agency moves to finalize the Tribal NSR rule the Regions are trying to prepare for implementation of the rule. One area where the Regions are looking for guidance on appropriate mechani sms to provide effective outreach to tribal members and sources on proposed permits. Note that this public involvement is a separate step from Tribal Consultation which takes place at a Government to Government level in the permit development process. In stead this document is designed to help the Regional Office consider ways to effectively outreach to community members and residents in Indian country that may be impacted by permitting actions under the rule. Additional resources are available under www.epa.gov/publicinvolvement

. Key elements to remember that each Tribal Government and each community is different so there will never be a one

- size fits all approach to effectively involving community me mbers. So the first step is to understand and get to know the community you are working with.

1) Familiarize yourself with the community it’s history, groups, and issues 2) Research how the community and affected public receives information and learn which sources they trust (social, civic, faith

- based, events or media such as newspapers, TV, radio, or the internet (local list

- serve) 3) Work with the Tribal Environmental professional for that tribe to help make contacts and identify vehicles for notification ge t advise on local outreach 4) Work with other EPA staff or other Agencies that have worked in the community before to build off of their experience 5) Identify any Community

- based organizations 6) Consider working with a neutral party to find and communicate with those who may be interested in the issue but may be uncomfortable working directly with the Agency, particularly with controversial permits. 7) Respect local work or traditional/cultural schedules for public outreach and communications make sure meetings an d hearing don’t occur during key cultural or ceremonial times. 8) Develop project specific mailing and contact lists using all appropriate methods including (door

- to

- door personal contact, telephoning, signup sheets and post card mailings). 9) Outreach methods s hould be tailored for each community and can include (electronic mail, printed flyers, mailings, meetings, door

- to

- door contact, radio, tribal newspapers , common regional mainstream papers) 10) Make sure all communications and in plain language and include app ropriate contact information. 11) Notices can be in local tribal offices, social, faith

- based, and civic organizations and in mall s, banks, grocery stores, libraries, schools and senior centers
**Exhibit 31.2** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Alan H. Lund, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K/A    of International Lease Finance Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual    report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this annual report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual    report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that    has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially    affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial    reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal controls over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: August 11, 2006 /s/  Alan    H. Lund    Alan H. Lund*Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and**Chief Accounting Officer*
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent 

Litigation 

 Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 

Judge James F. Holderman 

Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier This Document Relates To: 

1:12-cv-03878 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

On this day, Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Innovatio Management, LLC and Noel 

B. Whitley (collectively, “Innovatio”) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. announced to the Court 

that they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in the above-captioned 

actions. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for 

dismissal should be GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims by Innovatio 

against Defendant and by Defendant against Innovatio in the above-captioned actions, 

including Case Nos. 1:11-cv-09308 (consolidated) and 1:12-cv-03878, are dismissed, 

with prejudice to the re-filing of same. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses 

shall be borne by the party incurring the same. 

This is a final judgment. 

5/27/14 

_________________________________ 

James F. Holderman 

United States District Judge
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-50221

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LIONEL LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-96-CR-268-1)

_________________________________________________________________

July 9, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lionel Lewis appeals the consecutive six-month imprisonment

sentences imposed after his guilty plea to misdemeanor offenses of

re-entering a military base after being ordered not to do so and

assault (biting a military policeman post-arrest; Lewis was HIV

positive at the time). 

There is a dispute over the standard of review to be applied.

Because Lewis did not object to the sentence at the time it was
- 2 -

imposed by a magistrate judge, the Government contends that we

should review only for plain error. See United States v. Torrez,

40 F.3d 84, 86 (5th Cir. 1994). However, the district court

conducted a de novo review of Lewis’ challenge to his sentence. 

In any event, we affirm under either standard. Because no

sentencing guidelines were applicable to the offenses to which

Lewis pled guilty, his consecutive sentence was imposed, pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3584, after consideration of the statutory factors

in 18 U.S.C. § 3553. In a similar context, we have held that

implicit consideration of those factors is sufficient, so the

magistrate judge did not commit error by failing to explicitly

articulate any of them. See United States v. Teran, 98 F.3d 831,

836 (5th Cir. 1996). Moreover, based on, inter alia, the nature

and circumstances of the offense and the offender, and the need for

the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, the

imposition of consecutive sentences was warranted.

AFFIRMED
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 57 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE DOCUMENT AUTHORIZED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—A commemorative document in 

5 memory of the late President of the United States, George 

6 Herbert Walker Bush, shall be printed as a House docu7 ment, with illustrations and suitable binding, under the 

8 direction of the Joint Committee on Printing. 

9 (b) CONTENTS.—The document shall consist of the 

10 eulogies and encomiums for George Herbert Walker Bush, 

11 as expressed in the Senate and the House of Representa12 tives, together with the texts of each of the following: 

13 (1) The state funeral ceremony at the United 

14 States Capitol Rotunda. 

15 (2) The national funeral service held at the 

16 Washington National Cathedral, Washington, Dis17 trict of Columbia. 

18 (3) The memorial service held at St. Martin’s 

19 Episcopal Church, Houston, Texas. 
2 

†SCON 57 ES 

1 (4) The interment ceremony at the George Her2 bert Walker Bush Presidential Library Center, Col3 lege Station, Texas. 

4 SEC. 2. PRINTING OF DOCUMENT. 

5 In addition to the usual number of copies printed, 

6 there shall be printed the lesser of— 

7 (1) 32,500 copies of the commemorative docu8 ment, of which 22,150 copies shall be for the use of 

9 the House of Representatives and 10,350 copies 

10 shall be for the use of the Senate; or 

11 (2) such number of copies of the commemora12 tive document that does not exceed a production and 

13 printing cost of $1,000,000, with distribution of the 

14 copies to be allocated in the same proportion as de15 scribed in paragraph (1). 

Passed the Senate December 4, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 57 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of a commemorative docuUnited States, George Herbert Walker Bush. ment in memory of the late President of the
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 62 Filed: 10/19/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1200
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 62 Filed: 10/19/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:1201
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 62 Filed: 10/19/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:1202
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 62 Filed: 10/19/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:1203
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 62 Filed: 10/19/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:1204
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 62 Filed: 10/19/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:1205
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: KMR Minden LP v. Harris County Appraisal District

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00 152

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 70247

Trial court: 164 th District Court of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court for the trial court to enter written finding s of fact s and conclusions of law . The district clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s written finding s an d conclusions. On January 14, 2014, appellee filed a motion to reinstate this appeal and set briefing deadlines. Ac cordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Further, in light of the trial court’s written finding s and conclusions , the Court ORDERS

that a ppellant may file an amended or supplemental brief no later than February 7, 2014

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.7

.
The court further ORDERS that a ppellee ’s brief, if any, must be filed no later than the

earlier o f 30 days from the date the appellant’s amended or supplemental brief is filed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b)

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 23, 2014
#### 250.104 Residual powers.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63479-63480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25159]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty-Eighth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
twenty-eighth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 6, 2014 from 10:00 a.m.-
2:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:

November 6, 2014

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Report from the TSA
 Report on Safe Skies Document Distribution
 Individual Document Section Reports
 Action Items for Next Meeting
 Time and Place of Next Meeting
 Any Other Business
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

[[Page 63480]]

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 16, 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-25159 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```