alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsFigure 6. Number of Corophium spp. /m2 by station at Beach Nourishment Area W-45.0 in the lower Columbia River. Sampling was conducted in July and October 1994 and January and April 1995. Odd- and even-numbered stations were located about 15 and 30 m, respectively, from the high tide mark on the beach.
# C_2016372EN.01000102.xml

| 11.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8153 — Wilmar/Bunge/Bunge Indo-China Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 372/02)

On 3 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8153. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8153. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONof
Chief Financial Officer I, Robert J. Davis,
certify that: 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Liberator Medical Holdings,
Inc. (“the Small Business Issuer”). 2. Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Small Business Issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The Small
Business Issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Small Business Issuer,
and we have: (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Small Business Issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Small Business Issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the Small Business Issuer’s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Small Business Issuer’s
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Small Business Issuer’s internal control
over financial reporting; and 5. The Small
Business Issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Small Business Issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of Small
Business Issuer’s Board of Directors (or persons fulfilling the
equivalent function): (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Small Business Issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Small Business Issuer’s internal controls. Date: August 20, 2007 /s/ Robert J.
DavisRobert
J. Davis, Chief Financial Officer  2
123 STAT. 3488 PUBLIC LAW 111–129—JAN. 29, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2877: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Oct. 13, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–129 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 76 Brookside 

Avenue in Chester, New York, as the ‘‘1st Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. 1ST LIEUTENANT LOUIS ALLEN POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘1st Lieutenant Louis Allen 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘1st Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office’’. 

Approved January 29, 2010. 

Jan. 29, 2010 

[H.R. 2877] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
22.2106 Prohibited acts. In accordance with 29 CFR 13.6, and by operation of the clause at 52.222-62, Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706, a contractor may not— ( a ) Interfere with an employee's accrual or use of paid sick leave as required by E.O. 13706 or 29 CFR part 13 (see 29 CFR 13.6(a));
( b ) Discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee for— ( 1 ) Using, or attempting to use, paid sick leave as provided for under E.O. 13706 and 29 CFR part 13;
( 2 ) Filing any complaint, initiating any proceeding, or otherwise asserting any right or claim under E.O. 13706 or 29 CFR part 13;
( 3 ) Cooperating in any investigation or testifying in any proceeding under E.O. 13706 or 29 CFR part 13; or
( 4 ) Informing any other person about his or her rights under E.O. 13706 or 29 CFR part 13 (see 29 CFR 13.6(b)); or
( c ) Fail to make and maintain or to make available to authorized representatives of the Wage and Hour Division records for inspection, copying, and transcription as required by 29 CFR 13.25, or otherwise fail to comply with the requirements of 29 CFR 13.25 (see 29 CFR 13.6(c)).
Case: 1:12-cv-01521 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 03/01/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:30

Case: 1:12-cv-01521 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 03/01/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:31

Case: 1:12-cv-01521 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 03/01/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:32
| 1.   | the Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2011 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: February 7, 2011 | By: /s/ Tracy L. Morris             |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                   | Tracy L. Morris, Chief Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,892<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,064
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          23,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         35,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,064
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,875
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (243)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,691
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
<FN>
<F1>Includes $894 restricted.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### 242.7303 Responsibilities.

Follow the procedures at PGI 242.7303 when conducting a CIPR.

[71 FR 9273, Feb. 23, 2006]
#### In the Matter of the Application of Cornelia Gilman.

(Submitted June 5, 1883 ;

decided June 12, 1883.)

*William, H. Secor*for appellant.

*Remington Vernam,*respondent, in person.

Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
#### UNION BANK OF BROOKLYN, Appellant, v. CASE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by the Union Bank of Brooklyn against David K. Case, individually and as trustee. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

BLANCHARD, J.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in opinion rendered in action No. 1. 84 N. Y. Supp. 550. All concur.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 

OSERS is committed to acting on and responding to complete waiver requests as quickly as 

possible by providing an expedited response to the State educational agency (SEA) that submits 

this waiver and provides all necessary information. At the end of this form please click the 

submit button to submit this form directly to the IDEAwaiver@ed.gov mailbox. 

The Honorable Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitative Services Administration 

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for the 

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services 

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services 

U.S. Department of Education 

550 12th Street, SW 

Washington, DC 20202 

Dear Mr. Schultz: 

I am writing to request a waiver, pursuant to Section 3511 of Division A of the Coronavirus 

Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Public Law No. 116-136 (March 27, 

2020), of the requirements enumerated below on behalf of the:

and its subgrantees (e.g., local educational agencies (LEA)). 

Specifically, I request a waiver of Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

(GEPA), to extend the period of availability of Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 Individuals with 

Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant funds for which the State education agency 

participates as the eligible agency, through September 30, 2021. Under this approved waiver, 

FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant funds will be available for obligation through September 30, 

2021, and for liquidation through December 30, 2021. 

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2800 

www.ed.gov 

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness 

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. 
Date: 

State: 

Name of SEA: 

Please check all that apply:

☐ FFY 2018:

☐ IDEA Part B Grants to States (Section 611)

☐ IDEA Part B Grants to States (Section 619)

In seeking this waiver, I assure that:

☐ The SEA will use, and ensure that its subgrantees will use, funds in accordance

with all applicable statutes, regulations, and program plans, and applications not

subject to these waivers.

☐ The SEA will work to mitigate, and ensure that its subgrantees will work to

mitigate, negative effects, if any, that may occur as a result of the requested

waiver.

☐ This waiver is requested in response to extraordinary circumstances due to the

COVID-19 pandemic for which a national emergency was declared by the

President of the United States under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and

Emergency Assistance Act.

Thank you for your consideration, 

Name of Chief State School Officer: 

OR 

Authorized Representative: 

Title:
225.7300 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart contains policies and procedures for acquisitions for foreign military sales (FMS) under the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. Chapter 39). Section 22 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2762) authorizes DoD to enter into contracts for resale to foreign countries or international organizations.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to— ( 1 ) FMS made from inventories or stocks;
( 2 ) Acquisitions for replenishment of inventories or stocks; or
( 3 ) Acquisitions made under DoD cooperative logistic supply support arrangements.
[63 FR 43889, Aug. 17, 1998]
Order entered January 15 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01227
- CV
COMMERCIAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant
V. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. F/K/A VERICREST FINANCIAL, INC. AND CERNO SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 07683 

### O RDER Appellee has filed a notice of bankruptcy indicating that appellant filed bankruptcy on or about November 19, 2013 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Pursuant to T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8.2, a bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcy petition was filed until the appellate court reinstates or severs the appeal in accordance with federal law. Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this cause is ABATED and will be treated as a closed case. It may be reinstated on proper motion by any party showing that the stay has been lifted and specifying what further action, if any, is requi red from this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2, 8.3(a).
/s/ JIM MOSELEY PRESIDING JUSTICE
## United StatesDepartment of the Interior
FISH AND

### WILDLIFE SERVICE Boqueron Field Office Carr. 301, KM 5.1. Bo. Corow P.O. Box 491 Boqueron, PR 00622



## JUN 3 0 

## 2009

Ms. Grace Musumeci Chief, Environmental Review Section US EPA 290 Broadway New York, NY 10007-1866 Re: 2009 Puerto Rico WQS Regulations
Dear Ms. Musumeci:· This is in reply to yourMay 2009 request for ESA consultation regarding the proposed Puerto Rico Water Quality Standards revisions. Ourcomments are provided as technical assistance in accordance with the Fish and WildlifeCoordination Act (48Stat. 401. as amended; 16 U.S.c. 661 et seq.) and the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.c. 1531 ctseq. as amended). After receiving additional information from Dr. Izabela Wojtenko, we have the following comments: Endangered Species 1) The federally listed species within the range ofwater intakes and discharge areas

### ~overed by the proposed regulations are: the endangered Antillean manatce (Trichechus mana/us mana/us), the BrownPelican ( Pe!ecan.us ()ccidenlalis occidentalis) and the RoseateTern (Sterna douga/ii). 2) Section 1303.1 (1)(1 )&(2), deals with WQS for toxic substances to protectaquatic life. EPA has determined that the proposed changes to the PR WQS are not likely to adversely affect listed speciesunder the purview ofthe Service. We corlcur with that determination; thus no further consultation with the Service under Section 7 ofthe Act is required. 3) Itis impol1ant to note that NOAA Fisheries recently listed two Acropora coral species as threatened on May 9 2006 and the 4(d) nIle in 2008. It is important to take this species into consideration during the review ofthe PR and USVI WQS

..

### 2 

### Ms. Musumeci

Consultation pursuant to Section 7 (a)(2) for these two coral species should be conducted 

### with NOAA Fisheries. Habitat Concerns 1) 

### With regards to Class SC waters, this classification has a dissolved oxygen criteriaof4

### mgtlt. Class SC waters cover several port areas to 10.35

### miles seaward. These port areas are all fairly open and have good water circulation. There is 110 

### scientifically defensible reason as to why these waters have a Dissolved Oxygen WQS of4

### mgllt

.We have consistently stated that for coastal waters and estuary waters, this is not protective. The pOliS 

### ofMayaguez. Ponce, Yabucoa and GuayaniHa all have near shore coral reefs, some ofwhich are 

### in good health, The mean DO 

### in seawater at 86 degrees Fahrenheit 

### is 6.1 mgllt. A 

### WQS of

### 4mglltdoes not meet the goals described in the Usage and Description for SC waters and is not protective ofaquatic life, A minimum DO 

### WQS of5 

### mgllt is more indicative ofa system that 

### will adequately support aquatic life. Thank you for.the opportunity 

### to commenton this project, ifyou have any questions please contact Felix Lopez ofmy staffat 787 851 7297 x226,'

# t)j:I~~lyl 

# ')**~MUfiiZ** 

# l
Field Supervisor fhl cc: DNER, SanJuan EPA. San Juan EQB, San

### Juan NMFS, Boqueroll
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

TYLON HUDSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 4276

)

COUNTY OF COOK ILLINOIS, et al.,)

)

Defendants. )

________________________________)

)

TYLON HUDSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 5063

)

JOHN MUELLER, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

On March 6, 2013 this Court issued a brief memorandum order

(“Order”) that granted pro se plaintiff Tylon Hudson (“Hudson”),

whose appointed counsel has filed the equivalent of an Anders

motion and brief explaining his view “that Hudson’s claims are

wholly frivolous and without merit,” the opportunity to respond

on or before March 27 by submitting anything that in his own view

negated counsel’s conclusion. Nothing whatever has been 1

forthcoming from Hudson, and as foreshadowed in the Order this

Court agrees with former counsel’s evaluation of Hudson’s claims. 

 As with the typical Anders submission, this Court 1

simultaneously granted the appointed lawyer leave to withdraw as

Hudson’s counsel in both of these cases.
Accordingly it dismisses both of these lawsuits.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: March 28, 2013

2
#### 1516.303 Cost-sharing contracts.
#### 239.7201 Solicitation requirements.

Contracting officers shall ensure that all applicable Federal Information Processing Standards are incorporated into solicitations.

[71 FR 39011, July 11, 2006]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DISTRICT

O2COOL, LLC,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

MerchSource, LLC, Discovery 

Communications, LLC a California 

corporation,

Defendants.

Case No.: 12-C-3204

Judge Milton I. Shadur

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER

Defendants MerchSource, LLC and Discovery Communications, LLC hereby submit this 

Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3), or, in the alternative, to transfer the case 

against them to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the reasons detailed in Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in support of 

their motion to dismiss or transfer, submitted herewith. 

Dated: May 23, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

By: s/ Gregory Gulliver

Gregory Gulliver (ID # 6244525) 

THE ECLIPSE GROUP, LLP

100 Tri-State International, Suite 128

Lincolnshire, IL 60069

Tel. 847.282.3550

Fax 847.574.8035

Case: 1:12-cv-03204 Document #: 15 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:65
2

Connie P. Limperis (ID # 6231083)

THE ECLIPSE GROUP, LLP

402 W. Broadway, Suite 2050 

San Diego, CA 92101

Tel. 619.239.4340 Fax 619.239.0116

Attorneys for Defendants MerchSource, LLC and 

Discovery Communications, LLC 

Case: 1:12-cv-03204 Document #: 15 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:66
223.7303 Prohibition. ( a ) Except as provided in 223.7304 and 223.7305, no contract may include a specification or standard that results in a deliverable or construction material containing more than 0.1 percent hexavalent chromium by weight in any homogeneous material in the deliverable or construction material where proven substitutes are available that provide acceptable performance for the application.
( b ) This prohibition is in addition to any imposed by the Clean Air Act regardless of the place of performance.