Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules 42763 

Expansion of the current restricted 

area complex supports an increase in 

both Marine Corps and Naval aviation 

and ground training requirements. In 

addition, the expansion would allow 

critically required co-use of R–2507W in 

order to meet those increased training 

requirements. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subjected to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures,′′ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73 

Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted 

areas. 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 73 as 

follows: 

PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 73.25 California (Amended) 

■ 2. § 73.25 is amended as follows: 

* * * * * 

R–2507W West Chocolate Mountains, 

CA [New] 

Boundaries. Beginning at latitude 

33°14′00′′ N., longitude 115°22′33′′ W.; 

to latitude 33°13′14′′ N., longitude 

115°23′17′′ W.; to latitude 33°13′58′′ N., 

longitude 115°24′26′′ W.; to latitude 

33°14′22′′ N., longitude 115°25′29′′ W.; 

to latitude 33°15′40′′ N., longitude 

115°27′36′′ W.; to latitude 33°17′28′′ N., 

longitude 115°29′42′′ W.; to latitude 

33°19′17′′ N., longitude 115°32′13′′ W.; 

to latitude 33°21′11′′ N., longitude 

115°34′39′′ W.; to latitude 33°22′58′′ N., 

longitude 115°38′19′′ W.; to latitude 

33°27′26′′ N., longitude 115°43′30′′ W.; 

to latitude 33°29′25′′ N., longitude 

115°46′08′′ W.; to latitude 33°31′09′′ N., 

longitude 115°41′12′′ W.; to latitude 

33°32′50′′ N., longitude 115°37′37′′ W.; 

to latitude 33°32′40′′ N., longitude 

115°33′53′′ W.; to latitude 33°28′30′′ N., 

longitude 115°42′13′′ W.; to latitude 

33°23′40′′ N., longitude 115°33′23′′ W.; 

to latitude 33°21′30′′ N., longitude 

115°32′58′′ W.; to the point of beginning. 

Designated altitudes. Surface to FL 

230. 

Time of designation. Continuous. 

Controlling agency. FAA, Los Angeles 

Air Route Traffic Control Center 

(ARTCC). 

Using agency. USMC, Commanding 

Officer, Marine Corps Air Station 

(MCAS) Yuma, AZ. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on July 14, 

2015. 

Gary Norek, 

Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations 

Group. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17702 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0027; FRL–9930–78– 

Region–6] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; 

Low Reid Vapor Pressure Fuel 

Regulations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Texas State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) related to 

Low Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) Fuel 

Regulations that were submitted by the 

State of Texas on January 5, 2015. The 

EPA evaluated the Texas SIP submittal 

and determined these revisions are 

consistent with the requirements of the 

Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). The EPA 

is approving this action under the 

federal CAA. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before August 19, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Ms. Mary Stanton, Chief, Air Grants 

Section (6PD–S), Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Comments may also be submitted 

electronically or through hand delivery/ 

courier by following the detailed 

instructions in the ADDRESSES section of 

the direct final rule located in the rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tracie Donaldson, (214) 665–6633, 

Donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action 

no further activity is contemplated. If 

EPA receives relevant adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: July 7, 2015. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17742 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2015–0133; FRL–9930–86– 

Region 4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Florida; Combs 

Oil Company Variance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of 

Florida through the Department of 

Environmental Protection (DEP) on July 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

42764 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

31, 2009. The revision grants a variance 

to the Combs Oil Company, located in 

Naples, Florida. This source specific 

revision relieves the Combs Oil 

Company of the requirement to comply 

with the Florida rule governing 

installation and operation of vapor 

collection and control systems on 

loading racks at bulk gasoline plants. 

EPA is proposing approval of Florida’s 

July 31, 2009, SIP revision. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before August 19, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2015–0133, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4-ARMS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2015– 

0133,’’ Air Regulatory Management 

Section (formerly Regulatory 

Development Section), Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Chief, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2015– 

0133. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http://

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9043. 

Mr. Lakeman can be reached via 

electronic mail at lakeman.sean@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Florida Rule 62–296.418 requires 

bulk gasoline plants which began 

operation on or after August 1, 2007, to 

install and operate vapor collection and 

control systems on their loading racks. 

The rule became effective on May 9, 

2007, and was submitted to EPA as a 

proposed SIP revision on May 31, 2007. 

EPA approved the SIP revision on June 

1, 2009 (74 FR 26103). 

On May 30, 2007, Combs Oil 

Company submitted a petition for 

variance from the requirements of Rule 

62–296.418(2)(b)2, Florida 

Administrative Code (F.A.C.), for its 

new bulk gasoline plant. The company 

operates an existing bulk gasoline plant 

in Naples, Florida. The new plant 

would replace the existing plant and be 

constructed at a different site in the 

area. However, between July 2005 and 

January 2007, the company experienced 

substantial construction delays beyond 

its control due to the effects of 

hurricanes, both in Florida and along 

the upper Gulf Coast. The company 

experienced delays in obtaining steel for 

the office and loading/tank areas as well 

as the rationing of steel rebar and 

concrete supplies. Combs Oil Company 

had invested $67,053 in equipment and 

$40,235 in construction costs for the 

support structure of the loading rack 

prior to the DEP’s initiation of rule 62– 

296.418(2)(b)2, requiring a vapor 

collection and control system on the 

loading racks of new bulk gasoline 

plants. However, the company was 

unable to complete construction and 

relocation of its plant by August 1, 2007, 

due to the aforementioned construction 

delays. 

Under Section 120.542 of the Florida 

Statutes, the DEP may grant a variance 

when the person subject to a rule 

demonstrates that the purpose of the 

underlying statute will be or has been 

achieved by other means, or when 

application of a rule would create a 

substantial hardship or violate 

principles of fairness. The DEP 

determined that Combs Oil Company 

had demonstrated that principles of 

fairness would be violated because the 

delays in building and relocating to the 

new facility, related to hurricanes, were 

beyond the control of the company. 

Therefore, the DEP issued an Order 

Granting Variance to Combs Oil 

Company on August 20, 2008, relieving 

the company from the requirements of 

Rule 62–296.418(2)(b)2., F.A.C., for its 

proposed new facility. 

II. Analysis of State Submittal 

Section 110(l) of the CAA requires 

that SIP revisions must not interfere 

with any applicable requirement 

concerning attainment and reasonable 

further progress. Like the facility it is 

replacing, the new Combs Oil facility is 

located in Collier County in Southwest 

Florida. Collier County has never been 

designated nonattainment for any air 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules 42765 

pollutant and, thus, is not subject to any 

reasonable further progress 

requirements. Air quality monitoring is 

currently available in the county for 

ozone. A comparison of the Collier 

County data in relation to the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards for 

ozone is indicating that value is well 

within the compliance level. The ozone 

design value for 2011–2013 in Collier 

County is 0.060 parts per million (ppm). 

The proposed SIP revision involves 

emissions of volatile organic 

compounds (VOC), a precursor to ozone. 

For fine particulate matter (PM2.5), 

County-level nitrogen oxide, volatile 

organic compound and ammonia 

emissions were not considered because 

ambient PM2.5 concentrations in the 

southeastern U.S. tend to be impacted 

most significantly by emissions of direct 

PM2.5 emissions and SO2 emissions. As 

a result of the time involved in the 

chemical and physical transformations 

of the precursor emissions, the primary 

impact of the source cannot be 

explicitly determined but can be 

evaluated in terms of its addition to the 

county and regional emissions from all 

sources in this area. 

The proposed source is currently 

operating in the county and is simply 

moving a relatively short distance (1.6 

miles) within the same general area. 

Emissions of VOC from gasoline 

operations at the relocated source are 

estimated to be the same as VOC 

emissions at the existing facility, even 

when the increased storage capacity at 

the new location is considered. 

Specifically, VOC emissions are 

estimated to be less than 3 tons per 

year—minor in comparison to the 

county total of 31,816 tons per year. 

Since ozone concentration levels are 

currently well below the ambient air 

quality standard of 0.075 ppm, and 

emissions of VOC will not increase as a 

result of the relocation of this source, 

EPA has preliminary determined that 

the variance will not interfere with the 

area’s ability to continue to maintain the 

ozone standards. Thus, EPA has 

preliminarily determined that the 

changes are consistent with the Clean 

Air Act (CAA or Act). 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, the EPA is proposing to 

include in a final EPA rule, regulatory 

text that includes incorporation by 

reference. In accordance with 

requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is 

proposing to incorporate by reference 

the ‘‘Combs Oil Company Source 

Specific Variance’’ order granting 

variance on August 20, 2008. EPA has 

made, and will continue to make, these 

documents generally available 

electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 

for more information). 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is proposing to approve a source 

specific SIP revision submitted by the 

Florida DEP on July 31, 2009. The 

revision grants a variance to the Combs 

Oil Company, located in Naples, 

Florida. This source specific revision 

relieves the Combs Oil Company of the 

requirement to comply with the Florida 

rule governing installation and 

operation of vapor collection and 

control systems on loading racks at bulk 

gasoline plants. It should be noted that 

approval of the variance for Combs Oil 

Company only relieves them from the 

requirements of Rule 62–296.418(2)(b)2 

F.A.C., for its new bulk gasoline plant, 

it does not relieve them from any 

requirements established in 40 CFR 

parts 60 and 63. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable federal regulations. 

See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed 

action merely approves a state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), nor will it impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate 

Matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 6, 2015. 

Heather McTeer Toney, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17736 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0185; FRL–9930–87– 

Region 4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Alabama; 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

in part, and disapprove, the November 

4, 2011, State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

submission, provided by the Alabama 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS