alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 3, 2015

Mr. Craig Anthony Miller

Sunset Capture, Inc.

1201 Puerta Del Sol, Suite #229

San Clemente, CA 92673

Dear Mr. Miller:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

part 21, §§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 

91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a) and (b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your exemption request on behalf of Sunset Capture, Inc. filed in Docket 

No. FAA−2015−2421 on June 23, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any 

further. Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
Chart 1116AHOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       1116A          Edition:       74          Edition       Date: August       2009          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/22/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
#### 26.605 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.226-8, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving, in all solicitations and contracts.

[76 FR 39241, July 5, 2011. Redesignated and amended at 89 FR 30245, Apr. 22, 2024]
25.602-1 Section 1605 of the Recovery Act. Except as provided in 25.603— ( a ) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the Recovery Act may be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work unless the public building or public work is located in the United States and— ( 1 ) All of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used as construction material in the project are produced or manufactured in the United States. ( i ) All manufactured construction material must be manufactured in the United States.
( ii ) *Iron or steel components.* ( A ) Iron or steel components of construction material consisting wholly or predominantly of iron or steel must be produced in the United States. This does not restrict the origin of the elements of the iron or steel, but requires that all manufacturing processes of the iron or steel must take place in the United States, except metallurgical processes involving refinement of steel additives.
( B ) The requirement in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(A) of this section does not apply to iron or steel components or subcomponents in construction material that does not consist wholly or predominantly of iron or steel.
( iii ) *All other components.* There is no restriction on the origin or place of production or manufacture of components or subcomponents that do not consist of iron or steel.
( iv ) *Examples.* ( A ) If a steel guardrail consists predominantly of steel, even though coated with aluminum, then the steel would be subject to the section 1605 restriction requiring that all stages of production of the steel occur in the United States, in addition to the requirement to manufacture the guardrail in the United States. There would be no restrictions on the other components of the guardrail.
( B ) If a wooden window frame is delivered to the site as a single construction material, there is no restriction on any of the components, including the steel lock on the window frame; or
( 2 ) If trade agreements apply, the manufactured construction material shall either comply with the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this subsection, or be wholly the product of or be substantially transformed in a Recovery Act designated country;
( b ) Manufactured materials purchased directly by the Government and delivered to the site for incorporation into the project shall meet the same domestic source requirements as specified for manufactured construction material in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section; and
( c ) A project may include several contracts, a single contract, or one or more line items on a contract.
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

July 6, 2020

Honorable Jillian Balow 

State Superintendent 

Wyoming Department of Education 

2300 Capitol Avenue, Hathaway Building, 2nd Floor 

Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 

superintendent@wyo.gov 

Dear State Superintendent Balow: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant award HA027A180014 and H173A180076. 

The Department received your June 8, 2020 request on behalf of the Wyoming Department of

Education for a waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs State Lead, Jennifer Finch, at 

Jennifer.Finch@ed.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration. 

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services.

cc: State Director
EPA VERR# 4250 

Received: August 5, 2011
EPA VERR# 4250 

Received: August 5, 2011
EPA VERR# 4250 

Received: August 5, 2011
Exhibit 31(i)
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Camco Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Camco as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    Camcos other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and
15d 15(f))for Camco and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to Camco, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Camcos disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
annual report based on such evaluations; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in Camcos internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Camcos fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Camcos internal
control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    Camcos other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of Camcos board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in Camcos internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  August 8, 2008By:

/s/ Richard C. BaylorRichard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer
4400

4400

4350

4350

4400

4400

4300

4350

4400

4350

4400

4350

4300

4450

4300

4300

4300

4350

S S E D A N L N

Y O D E R R D

H E R R IN G R D

S S E D A N L N

D IT T L E R A N C H R D

H E R R IN G R D

B A G O T R A N C H R D

M C A D A M S R D

S S E D A N L N

L E W IS R D

R E E V E S L N

B A G O T R D

B U N K E R H IL L R D

H E R R IN G R D

S S E D A N L N

L E W IS R D

S S E D A N L N

Y O D E R R D

H E R R IN G R D

S S E D A N L N

D IT T L E R A N C H R D

H E R R IN G R D

B A G O T R A N C H R D

M C A D A M S R D

S S E D A N L N

L E W IS R D

R E E V E S L N

B A G O T R D

B U N K E R H IL L R D

H E R R IN G R D

S S E D A N L N

L E W IS R D

Lake Windmill

Red White and Blue

Sand Hills

Bunker

Hill

Windy

Hill

Bunker

Hill

Sandhill

Windmill

Steel

Windmill

Martin

Ranch

Bagot

Ranch

Northwest Red

White and Blue Windmill Northeast Red

White and Blue Windmill

Windy

Hill

Wharton

Ranch

Windy

Hill NW

Syndicate

Hills

Sedan NE

Wells

Ranch

Koger

Ranch

Sedan SE

Beck

Ranch

000m

000m

97

39

39

6 81 91

102°

FV

6

94

82

39

99

30"

6

39

30"

4

97

84 07'

6

39

00'

88

39

91

36° 91

020

07'

30"

94

N

52'

6 6

39

103° 87

93

89

39

92

N

6

30" FEET

30"

95

5'

00'

90

98

39

86

83

52'

39

89

6

39

90 6

30"

55'

050

39

91

85

000

36°

30"

86

39

4

39

00'

39

6

81 6

88

36° 240

6

39

82

96

00' 88

39

6

87

000m

99

39

98

6

39

5'

103°

83

89

000m

89

39

39

88

E 102°

2' 2'

36°

57' 30"

57' 55'

000

000

6 6

6

39

6

6 6

39

39

6

39

39

93

87

96

85 86

90

92

90

87

E

FEET

FEET

220 000 FEET

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 36102-222

WINDY HILL, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WINDY HILL QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

Zone 13S

Imagery...................................................NAIP, August 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2005

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2002

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 13 ́

22 MILS

7° 43 ́

137 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13S

FV

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7019

JAMES EDWARD BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA PRISONS (DOC),

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (1:04-cv-00961-GBL)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Christopher Galanides,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude Brown has not made

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Brown’s motion for

a transcript. While we grant Brown’s motion to amend his

preliminary brief, we find the issues raised in the brief are

frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32(f)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter M. Scott III, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Peter M. Scott
III


Peter M.
Scott III


Executive
Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer


August 8,
2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Dear Colleague Letter on Audit Quality - September 2016(PDF, 1MB)

Frequently Asked Questions on Using Federal Funds for Conferences and Meetings—December 2014(MS Word, 115KB)

Guidance on Late Liquidation of Federal Education Funds - September 27, 2007

Cost Allocation Guide for State and Local Governments(PDF 1.2MB)

Grantmaking at ED–Answers to Your Questions About the Discretionary Grants Process(PDF 856KB)

Key Financial Management Requirements for Discretionary Grants Awarded by the Department of Education (ED) (Word, 108KB)

Treasury Offset Program - Frequently Asked Questions For U.S. Department of Education Grantees and Payees (Word, 110KB)

Archived information
#### 232.704 Limitation of cost or funds.
#### 252.236-7004 Payment for mobilization and demobilization.

As prescribed in 236.570(b)(2), use the following clause:

# Payment for Mobilization and Demobilization (DEC 1991)

(a) The Government will pay all costs for the mobilization and demobilization of all of the Contractor's plant and equipment at the contract lump sum price for this item.

(1) ________ percent of the lump sum price upon completion of the contractor's mobilization at the work site.

(2) The remaining ________ percent upon completion of demobilization.

(b) The Contracting Officer may require the Contractor to furnish cost data to justify this portion of the bid if the Contracting Officer believes that the percentages in paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this clause do not bear a reasonable relation to the cost of the work in this contract.

(1) Failure to justify such price to the satisfaction of the Contracting Officer will result in payment, as determined by the Contracting Officer, of—

(i) Actual mobilization costs at completion of mobilization;

(ii) Actual demobilization costs at completion of demobilization; and

(iii) The remainder of this item in the final payment under this contract.

(2) The Contracting Officer's determination of the actual costs in paragraph (b)(1) of this clause is not subject to appeal.

(End of clause)
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

SORL Auto Parts, Inc.

No. 1169 Yumeng Road

Ruian Economic Development Zone

Ruian City, Zhejiang Province

People’s Republic of China

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on form S-8 dated October 19, 2005  of our report dated March 9, 2006 relating to the audit of the consolidated financial statements and schedules of SORL Auto Parts, Inc. included in its Amended Annual Report (Form 10-K amendment # 1) for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

| /s/  ROTENBERG AND COMPANY,   LLP |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        |   |
| Rochester, New York                    |   |
|                                   |   |
| June 1, 2006                           |   |

----
```

[House Report 111-494]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     111-494

======================================================================

 
   WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
 RULES, AND PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

May 25, 2010.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. Hastings of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1392]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1392, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The resolution applies the 
waiver to any resolution reported on the legislative day of May 
26th, 2010 relating to consideration or disposition of the 
Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4213) to amend the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain expiring provisions, and 
for other purposes. The resolution authorizes the Speaker to 
entertain motions that the House suspend the rules at any time 
through the calendar day of May 30, 2010. The Speaker or her 
designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee 
on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to 
section 2 of the resolution.

                                  

```
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.68 Claims payable. When all of the following are present, payment of a claim in the amount of $1,000 or less is authorized if it: ( a ) Is for property damage, personal injury, or death. Payment for a personal injury or death claim is limited to costs of reasonable medical, hospital, and burial expenses actually incurred and not otherwise furnished or paid by the United States.
( b ) Was caused by a military member or civilian employee of the Air Force, whether acting within or outside the scope of employment.
( c ) Arose from the use of a government vehicle at any place or from the use of other government property on a government installation.
( d ) Is not payable under any other provision of law except Article 139, UCMJ.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83695, Nov. 22, 2016]