alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 20

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate 
corporations, limited liability companies, and other corporate entities 
established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign 
                                 state.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2017

 Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate 
corporations, limited liability companies, and other corporate entities 
established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign 
                                 state.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The rights enumerated in this Constitution and other 
rights retained by the people shall be the rights of natural persons.
    ``Section 2. As used in this Constitution, the terms `people', 
`person', and `citizen' shall not include a corporation, a limited 
liability company, or any other corporate entity established by the 
laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state.
    ``Section 3. A corporate entity described in section 2 shall be 
subject to such regulation as the people, through representatives in 
Congress and State representatives, may determine reasonable, 
consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this 
Constitution.
    ``Section 4. Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to 
limit the rights enumerated in this Constitution and other rights 
retained by the people, which are unalienable.''.
                                 <all>
```
2432.006-3 Responsibilities. ( b ) HUD personnel shall report immediately in writing when a contractor's request for advance, partial, or progress payments is suspected to be fraudulent. The report shall be made to the contracting officer and the remedy coordination official. The report shall describe the events, acts, and conditions that indicate the apparent or suspected violation and include all pertinent documents. The remedy coordination official will consult with, and refer cases to, the Office of the Inspector General for investigation, as appropriate. If appropriate, the Office of the Inspector General will provide a report to the Senior Procurement Executive.
[77 FR 73530, Dec. 10, 2012]
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 28 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:127
Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 28 Filed: 08/22/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:128
#### 232.603 Debt determination.

When transferring a case to the contract financing office, follow the procedures at PGI 232.603.

[80 FR 58633, Sept. 30, 2015]
3700

85

85

20

20

20

C H R IS P F O X D R

B O R D E R H W Y

B O R D E R H W Y

B O R D E R H W Y

85

85

20

20

20

C H R IS P F O X D R

B O R D E R H W Y

B O R D E R H W Y

B O R D E R H W Y

VALLEY GATE LATERAL

Rio Grande

Rio Grande

Ascarate Lake

EL PASO

Lakeside

UNITED

STATES

OF

AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED

STATES

OF

AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS

MEXICANOS

Fort

Bliss SE

San

Elizario

Ysleta NW

Smeltertown

Ysleta

El Paso

CR CQ

CR

CQ

106°22'30"

40'

42' 42'

40'

30" 30"

22'

25'

30"

27'30" 25'

37'

106° 106°

45'

27'30"

45'

10 650 000

410 000 FEET

30'

31°

30'

31°

106°

31° 30"

30"

37' 31°

10 610 000

E

00

35

35

35

35

35

35

35

000m

35

3 3

3

35

35

3

35

3 3 3

3

3

000m

3

35

3 3

35

3

35

3 3

35

35

3 3

3 3

35

35

35

35

000m

35

3

000m

35

3

3

35

3

35

3

35

35

35

12

13

01

N

00

02

03

61 67

10

05

65

06

64

10

58

05

60

E

62

06

07

63

N

69

12

68

04

63

09

58

60 65

07

68 69

08

11

11

59 66

04

67

13

08

59

61 62

64 66

02

03

01

FEET

FEET

380 000 FEET

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 31106-423

YSLETA NW, TX-CHH

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

YSLETA NW QUADRANGLE

TEXAS-CHIHUAHUA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 13R

Imagery.............................................NAIP, September 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2004

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2005

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 45 ́

13 MILS

8° 56 ́

159 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13R

CQ

CR 35 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
#### SNOWDEN, Respondent, v. TOWN OF SOMERSET, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 24, 1903.)

Action by Sarah J. Snowden against the town of Somerset.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, upon questions of law only; the facts having been examined and no error found therein". Held, that it was incompetent to allow the plaintiff’s witness, Sprague, to testify to declarations made to him by the plaintiff, long after the accident, in regard to the manner in which she attempted to get out of the wagon and received her injuries; also held, that it was error for the trial justice to charge the jury in effect that it was a matter of very little importance for them to determine just what plaintiff’s injury was, or what the precise nature of the latter was.

McLennan, P. J., and SPRING, J., dissent upon the ground that the errors were not of sufficient importance to require the granting of a new trial.
Order entered October 1 4 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01084
- CV
DALLAS COUNTY HOSPIT AL DISTRICT D/B/A PARKLAND HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SYSTEM , Appellant
V. LAURA CONSTANTINO, Appellee On Appeal from the 162 nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 02236
- I 

### O RDER
We GRANT the parties’ October 11, 2013 joint motion for an extension of time to file appellee’s brief and appellant’s reply brief. Appellee shall file her brief on or before November 1, 2013. Appellant shall file any reply brief on or before December 10, 2013. We caution the parties that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS JU STICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                   VERIO INC.

         VERIO INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of VERIO INC. (the
"Corporation"), duly held on February 17, 2000, resolutions were duly adopted
setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said
Corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable. The resolution setting
forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

         RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation be,
and it hereby is, amended by deleting the first paragraph of Article Four
thereof and replacing it with the following:

                                  "ARTICLE FOUR

                                1. CAPITAL STOCK

         The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the Corporation
is authorized to issue is seven hundred seventy million (770,000,000) shares,
consisting of seven hundred fifty million (750,000,000) shares of Common Stock,
par value $.001 per share, and twenty million (20,000,000) shares of Preferred
Stock, par value $.001 per share."

         SECOND: That thereafter, the 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
said Corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with
Sections 211 and 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at
which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute was voted in
favor of the amendment.

         THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

         FOURTH: That the capital of said Corporation shall not be reduced under
or by reason of said amendment.



<PAGE>   2

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer
of the Corporation, for the purpose of amending the Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, does make and file this Certificate, hereby declaring and
certifying that the facts herein stated are true, and accordingly has hereunto
set my hand this 28th day of April, 2000.


                                       VERIO INC.



                                       By: /s/ Justin L. Jaschke
                                          -----------------------
                                          Justin L. Jaschke
                                          Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AeroTelesis,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for
the  period  ended  June 30,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the  undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

By /s/ Jagan Narayanan
-------------------------------
Dr. Jagan Narayanan, CEO

By /s/ Joseph Gutierrez
-------------------------------
Joseph Gutierrez, CFO

Dated: August 12, 2004
*Note:  These Congressional Budget Justifications do not include State tables. For the latest State tables, please visit the Department's State Tables page*.

### Volume I

- Education for the Disadvantaged download files PDF (1.4MB)
- School Readiness download files PDF (1.4MB)
- Impact Aid download files  PDF (1.2MB)
- School Improvement Programs download files PDF (2.0MB)
- Safe Schools and Citizenship Education download files PDF (2.0MB)
- Indian Education download files PDF (1.2MB)  )
- Innovation and Improvement download files PDF (1.9MB)
- English Language Acquisition download files PDF (622KB)
- Special Education download files PDF (1.6MB)
- Rehabilitation Services download files PDF (1.9MB)

### Volume II

- American Printing House for the Blind download files PDF (73KB)
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf download files PDF (172KB)
- Gallaudet University download files PDF (228KB)
- Career, Technical, and Adult Education download files PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Overview download files PDF (232KB)
- Student Financial Assistance download files PDF (1.8MB)
- TEACH Grants download files PDF (1.0MB)
- Student Loans Overview download files PDF (1.2MB)
- Higher Education download files PDF (2.7MB)
- Howard University download files PDF (222KB)
- College Housing and Academic Facilities Loans Program Account download files PDF (162KB)
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program Account download files PDF (301KB)
- Institute of Education Sciences download files PDF (675KB)
- Salaries and Expenses Overview download files PDF (553KB)
- Program Administration download files PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Administration download files PDF (1.4MB)
- Office for Civil Rights download files PDF (474KB)
- Office of Inspector General download files PDF (343KB)

|Last Modified: 02/03/2015
|-------------------------
#### 223.7402 Prohibition.

Do not procure any fire-fighting agent that contains in excess of one part per billion perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances. Procurements of fire-fighting agent for use solely onboard ocean-going vessels are exempt from this prohibition.

[89 FR 20871, Mar. 26, 2024]
2146.270 FEGLI Program quality assurance requirements. ( a ) The contractor shall develop and apply a quality assurance program specifying procedures for assuring contract quality, as directed by the contracting officer. At a minimum, the program should include procedures to address: ( 1 ) Accuracy of payments and recovery of overpayments;
( 2 ) Timeliness of payments to beneficiaries;
( 3 ) Quality of services and responsiveness to beneficiaries;
( 4 ) Quality of service and responsiveness to OPM; and
( 5 ) Detection and recovery of fraudulent claims.
( b ) The Contractor must prepare overpayment recovery guidelines to include a system of internal controls.
( c ) The contracting officer may order the correction of a deficiency or a modification in the contractor's services and/or quality assurance program. The contractor shall take the necessary action promptly to implement the contracting officer's order. If the contracting officer orders the correction of a deficiency or a modification of the contractor's services and/or quality assurance program pursuant to this paragraph after the contract year has begun, the costs incurred in correcting the deficiency or making the modification will not be considered to the contractor's detriment in the cost control factor of the service charge [if applicable] for the following contract year. However, if there is a deficiency, the deficiency itself may be taken into consideration.
[58 FR 40380, July 28, 1993, as amended at 70 FR 41153, July 18, 2005]
Attachment C – 

Milestones and Activities by Month/Year for Meeting WQBEL 

 at Stormwater Treatment Areas 
Milestones and Activities by Month/Year for Meeting WQBEL at Stormwater 

STA 1W Land AcquisitionDesignAcquire all permitsConstructionFloodingSTA Adjusting to WQBELDischarge Consistent WQBELSTA 1EDecommission PSTAACOE RepairsSTA adjusting to repairsImproved PerformanceDivert Flows to STA 1WDischarge Consistent WQBELSTA 2 - Comp B SBOAssumed Court RulingNEPA ReviewDesignAcquire All PermitsConstruction A1/As STAFlooding A1/A2 Accepting FlowsSTA 2/Comp B-SBO to WQBELSTA 3/4 - Comp B NBOAssume Court RulesNEPA ReviewDesign A1 shallow storageAcquire all permitsConstruction shallow storageA1 is floodedSTA 3/4 & B-NBOSTA 3/4 & B-NBO Meets WQBELSTA 5/6/Comp C/C-139Construction Comp CComp C is floodedSTA 5/6 AdjustingSTA 5/6/Comp C ImprovedFlow going thru C-139STA 5/6/Comp C Meets WQBELLand Acquisition C-139NEPA ReviewDesign (C-139)Acquire all permits C-139Construction C-139Flooding C-139Flows Now Going to C-139

Note: Each month equals one cell. The right end of the bar (or right side of an individual cell) represents the end of the month. 

CourtCourt

 Design

Construction 

Permitting 

Permitting

Design 

NEPA REVIEW 

Permitting 

ACOE Repairing STA

Flooding

STA Adjusting

Decommission PSTA

Design

Design

Permitting 

2011 2012 2013

Acquiring Land

Construction 

2014 2015 2016 

NEPA REVIEW 

2010

Construction

Flooding Comp C

NEPA Review

 Flooding

Adjusting

Adjusting

Flooding

Construction 

Improved Performance
#### 237.102-75 Defense Acquisition Guidebook.

See PGI 237.102-75 for information on the Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Chapter 10, Acquisition of Services.

[81 FR 36473, June 7, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 61481, Dec. 28, 2017]
- National Assessment of Career and Technical Education: Interim Report  (2013)    PDF
- The Carol M. White Physical Education Program Project Implementation During Year 1 of the Grant  (2012)    PDF
- Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project  (2010)    PDF
- Evaluation of the Implementation of the Rural and Low-Income School (RLIS) Program: Interim Report  (2009)    MS Word
- State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume IV—Title I School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services: Interim Report  (2008)    PDF
- State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume II-Teacher Quality under NCLB: Interim Report  (2007)    PDF
- State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, Volume III-Accountability Under NCLB: Interim Report  (2007)    PDF
- State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I: 2003-04  (2007)
- State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I: 2002-03  (2007)
- State ESEA Title I Participation Information for 2003-04  (2007)    PDF
- The Reading First Implementation Evaluation  (2006)    PDF
- State ESEA Title I Participation Information for 2002-03  (2006)    PDF
- Evaluation of Title I Accountability Systems and School Improvement Efforts: Findings From 2002-03  (2005)    PDF
- State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I: 2001-02  (2005)
- State ESEA Title I Participation Information for 2001-02  (2005)    PDF
- Early Implementation of the Supplemental Educational Services Provisions of the No Child Left Behind: Year One Report  (2004)    PDF
- Evaluation of Title I Accountability and School Improvement Efforts (TASSIE): First Year Findings  (2004)    PDF
- State ESEA Title I Participation Information for 2000-2001  (2004)    PDF
- State Title I Migrant Participation Information: 1999-2000  (2004)    PDF
- Evaluation Brief: Provision of Title I Services  (2002)    PDF
- Evaluation Brief: Schools Identified as in Need of Improvement Under Title I  (2002)    PDF
- Evaluation Brief: Teacher Professional Development in Title I Schools  (2002)    PDF
- Fact Sheet on Title I Part A  (2002)    PDF
- State Title I Migrant Participation Information: 1998-1999  (2002)    PDF
- Evaluation of Magnet Schools Assistance Program: 1998 Grantees: Year 1 Interim Report  (2001)
- Migrant Education Program Annual Report: Eligibility, Participation, Services  (2001-02) and Achievement  (2002-03)  (2006)    PDF
- Evaluation of Public Charter Schools Program: Year One Evaluation Report  (2000)
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-9 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:328 Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 19-8 Filed: 09/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:459
#### 245.201-70 Security classification.

Follow the procedures at PGI 245.201-70 for security classification.

[88 FR 88537, Dec. 22, 2023]
#### In the Matter of Hornell City Court.

Order entered for destruction of records.
#### Raymond Cerasoli, Respondent-Appellant, v. A. De Bevoise Co., Inc., Respondent, and Mt. Vernon Contracting Corp., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent, Raymond Cerasoli, against the defendant-appellant, Mt. Vernon Contracting Corp., and with costs to the defendant-respondent, A. De Bevoise Co., Inc., against the plaintiff-appellant, Raymond Cerasoli. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 215 

Designating July 14, 2017, as Collector Car Appreciation Day and recognizing 

that the collection and restoration of historic and classic cars is an 

important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural 

heritage of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2017 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. TESTER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 14, 2017, as Collector Car Appreciation 

Day and recognizing that the collection and restoration 

of historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic 

automobiles as a pastime and do so with great passion 

and as a means of individual expression; 

Whereas the Senate recognizes the effect that the more than 

100-year history of the automobile has had on the economic progress of the United States and supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restoration and exhibition of classic automobiles; 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 215 IS 

Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses 

have been instrumental in preserving a historic part of 

the heritage of the United States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage works of art; 

Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, highskilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, 

photography, cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits 

that have become part of the popular culture of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 14, 2017, as ‘‘Collector Car 

3 Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that the collection and restora5 tion of historic and classic cars is an important part 

6 of preserving the technological achievements and cul7 tural heritage of the United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to engage in events and commemorations of Col10 lector Car Appreciation Day that create opportuni11 ties for collector car owners to educate young people 

12 about the importance of preserving the cultural her13 itage of the United States, including through the 

14 collection and restoration of collector cars. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS