alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
215.203-70 Requests for proposals—tiered evaluation of offers. ( a ) The tiered or cascading order of precedence used for tiered evaluation of offers shall be consistent with FAR part 19.
( b ) Consideration shall be given to the tiers of small businesses (*e.g.*, 8(a), HUBZone small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, small business) before evaluating offers from other than small business concerns.
( c ) The contracting officer is prohibited from issuing a solicitation with a tiered evaluation of offers unless— ( 1 ) The contracting officer conducts market research, in accordance with FAR Part 10 and Part 210, to determine— ( i ) Whether the criteria in FAR part 19 are met for setting aside the acquisition for small business; or
( ii ) For a task or delivery order, whether there are a sufficient number of qualified small business concerns available to justify limiting competition under the terms of the contract; and
( 2 ) If the contracting officer cannot determine whether the criteria in paragraph (c)(1) of this section are met, the contracting officer includes a written explanation in the contract file as to why such a determination could not be made (Section 816 of Public Law 109-163).
[71 FR 53043, Sept. 8, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 42314, Aug. 2, 2007]
#### Frouge Corporation v. Joly Hartert.

Motion for leave to prosecute under the Appendix System denied as unnecessary. Under rule V of the rules of this court an appeal may be prosecuted as of right upon a record or statement authorized by CPLR 5526, 5527, 5528 at appellant’s option. Concur — Botein, P. J., Brietel, Rabin, Yalente and McNally, JJ
## Assistant Secretary, OCO
## SERVED: October 6, 2016
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## DE.PARTHEHT Of WASHINGTON, DC 

## TRANSPORTATION

. Zilb OCT I I P 2: 25 I. In The Matter Of: ) ) ) 

### ) ) 

## DOCKET OPERA T

ION S Docket No. FAA-2015-1321 Fisher Scientific Company, LLC Case No. 201180700457 Respondent

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS
On October 4, 2016, the undersignedjudge held a prehearing conference where the parties presented oral arguments regarding the Respondent' s Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Insufficiency and for Complainant's Violation ofRule 208. During the prehearing conference, the undersignedjudge reserved ruling on Respondent' s previously filed motions. That same day, Respondent's Counsel filed a Notice ofInterlocutory Appeal ofRight based upon a failure ofthe Administrative Law Judge to dismiss the proceedings in accordance with 14 C.P.R. §13.215.
Pursuant to 14 C.P

.R.§ 13.219(c), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: the proceedings in this case

are stayed until the FAA decisionmaker issues a decision on the interlocutory appeal. 1

Attachment: Service List DOUGLAS M. RAW ALD Administrative Law Judge

1 In the Notice ofInterlocutory Appeal ofRight, the Respondent requested a copy ofthe transcript from the October 4, 2016 prehearing conference be provided no later than October 10, 2016. Pursuant to the contract with the court reporting company, a copy ofthe transcript will be provided to all parties within 15 days ofthe hearing. If necessary, the Respondent should contact For The Record, Inc. at 301-870-8025 to attempt to obtain an expedited copy, or request additional time from the FAA decisionmaker to submit the appellate brief.

### Docket No. FAA-2015-1321 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0002



### Jerry W. Cox, Respondent's Counsel 

### Counsel for Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

and Fisher Scientific Co., LLC 2050 Jamieson Ave., Suite 1212 Alexandria, VA 22314 TEL: 703-757-5866 

### ONE COPY

Email: 

### j cox@potomacstrategyassociates.com
Andrea Michelle Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

### Senior Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Enforcement Division, Southern Team Federal Aviation Administration P.0. 

### Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223
The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (£11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

2 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 32(f)








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark F. Mulhern, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark F. Mulhern


Mark F. Mulhern


Senior Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


August 7, 2009








This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
225.7017-4 Solicitation provision and contract clause. ( a ) ( 1 ) Use the clause at 252.225-7017, Photovoltaic Devices, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for a contract expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold that may be a covered contract, *i.e.,* an energy savings performance contract, a utility service contract, or a private housing contract awarded by DoD, if such contract will result in DoD ownership of photovoltaic devices, by means other than DoD purchase as end products.
( 2 ) Use the clause in the resultant contract, including contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, if it is a covered contract.
( b ) Use the provision at 252.225-7018, Photovoltaic Devices—Certificate, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that contain the clause at 252.225-7017.
[76 FR 78860, Dec. 20, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 37988, June 25, 2013. Redesignated and amended at 80 FR 72603, Nov. 20, 2015; Redesignated and amended at 83 FR 62500, Dec. 4, 2018; 88 FR 6584, Jan. 31, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 51 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 51

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 21, 2017

 Mr. Cassidy introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has served 9 consecutive terms as a 
Representative shall be eligible for election to the House of 
Representatives for a tenth consecutive term. For purposes of this 
section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of 
Representatives shall be included as 1 term in determining the number 
of terms that such person has served as a Representative if the person 
fills the vacancy for more than 1 year. Nothing in this section shall 
prevent a person described in the first sentence from being eligible 
for election to the House of Representatives for a subsequent term if 
there is a period of not less than 1 year between such consecutive 
terms and the subsequent term.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served 3 consecutive terms as a 
Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate for 
a fourth consecutive term. For purposes of this section, the election 
or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate shall be 
included as 1 term in determining the number of terms that such person 
has served as a Senator if the person fills the vacancy for more than 3 
years. Nothing in this section shall prevent a person described in the 
first sentence from being eligible for election or appointment to the 
Senate for a subsequent term if there is a period of not less than 1 
year between such consecutive terms and the subsequent term.
    ``Section 3. No term of service beginning before the date of the 
ratification of this article shall be taken into account in determining 
eligibility for election or appointment under this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### 2401.105 Issuance.
#### Daniel Goldschmidt, Respondent, *v.*Claude Chaffanjon, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

(Submitted October 11, 1883 ;

decided October 26, 1883.)

*Louis Mathot*for appellant.

*William G. Wilson*for respondent.

Agree to affirm ; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
Full Document PDF (9.8M)

Message From the Secretary PDF (365K)

**Management's Discussion and Analysis**PDF (2M)

- About the Management's Discussion and Analysis/About the Department/The Department in FY23    PDF  (826K)
- The Department’s Approach to Performance    PDF  (459K)
- Financial Highlights    PDF  (847K)
- Secretary’s Statement of Assurance/Analysis of  Systems, Controls, and Legal Compliance    PDF  (390K)
- Forward-Looking Information    PDF  (324K)

**Financial Section**PDF (2.1M)

- About the Financial Section    PDF  (1.2M)
- Message from CFO    PDF  (190K)
- The Consolidated Balance Sheet    PDF  (135K)
- Notes to the Consolidated Balance Sheet    PDF  (357K)
- Report of the Independent Auditors    PDF  (716K)

**Other Information**PDF (3.6M)

- About the Other Information Section    PDF  (1.5M)
- The Consolidated Statement of Net Cost, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Position, and Combined Statement of Budgetary Resources    PDF  (147K)
- Notes to the Consolidated Statement of Net Cost, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Position, and Combined Statement of Budgetary Resources    PDF  (532K)
- Required Supplementary Information    PDF  (175K)
- Memo From the Office of Inspector General    PDF  (504K)
- Office of the Inspector General’s Management and Performance Challenges for Fiscal Year 2024    PDF  (1.5M)
- Summary of Financial Statement Audit and Management Assurances    PDF  (178K)
- Payment Integrity Information Act Reporting    PDF  (308K)
- Civil Monetary Penalty Adjustment for Inflation    PDF  (204K)
- Climate Related Financial Risk    PDF  (154K)
- GONE Act of 2016 and Education’s Grant Closeout Process    PDF  (204K)

**Appendices**PDF (2.1M)

| Properties: | Title: U.S. Department of Education FY 2023  Agency Financial Report          |
|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        | Author:  U.S.  Department of Education, Office of the Chief Financial Officer |
2406.304 Approval of the justification. ( a ) ( 3 ) HUD's Chief Procurement Officer, as the Head of Contracting Activity, has delegated the authority to the Deputy Chief Procurement Officer to approve, in writing, justifications for other than full and open competition procurements for proposed contracts over $13.5 million, but not exceeding $68 million.
( c ) A class justification for other than full and open competition shall be approved in writing by the Senior Procurement Executive.
[50 FR 46576, Nov. 8, 1985, as amended at 81 FR 13750, Mar. 15, 2016]
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, David A. DeLorenzo, President and Chief Executive Officer,    certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of Dole Food Company, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  David    A. DeLorenzo    David A. DeLorenzo*President and Chief Executive Officer*     July 31, 2007
On May 9, 2013, President Obama signed an executive order that made open and machine-readable data the new default for government information. Making information about government operations more readily available and useful is also core to the promise of a more efficient and transparent government.

ED's public data listing in machine readable format is located at www.ed.gov/data.json. Below is a web-enabled version featuring searching, filtering and links to additional downloads and resources. We will continue to expand the contents of our public data listing regularly as new information becomes available.
#### 227.7202-2 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Milton N. Bedrick, Appellant, v. Michael Martone et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law, to correct and validate the petition designating the petitioner Bedrick as the candidate, to be voted upon at the forthcoming primary election, for the party position of committeeman of the Democratic party from the City of Glen Cove in the County of Nassau and from the 18th Election District in said city, the said petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 23, 1963, without a hearing on the merits, which dismissed the petition in this proceeding for lack of jurisdiction. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for a hearing on the merits and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Under all the circumstances we are of the opinion: (1) That due notice of the application, both personally and by service of a copy of the papers, was given to the individual respondents, Martone and Brown, within the time prescribed; and (2) that, in any event, by reason of their conduct, the said respondents were estopped from contesting the timely service of the papers upon them. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur,
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table A-6. Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in livers of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1990. - a,b,c,d,e,g,h 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-6. Continued. Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in livers of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1990. - a,b,c,d,e,g,h 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-6. Continued. Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in livers of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1990. - a,b,c,d,e,g,h 

Footnotes:

a The concentrations of the analytes and the percent recovery of the surrogate standard were calculated using the surrogate standard tetrachloro-m-xylene as the internal standard.

b The "less than" symbol (<) indicates that the analyte was not detected in concentrations above the stated value. 

c Concentrations and initial identifications were determined using gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (ECD).

d Concentrations less than 10 are rounded to one significant figure; concentrations greater than 10 are rounded to two significant figures.

e Percent recovery for the internal standard (surrogate) averaged 99%, CV = 6%, n = 25. Percent recovery of the surrogate includes quality control samples.

f Aldrin coelutes with an unknown compound. The concentration would not be higher than the stated value.

g The concentrations of the analytes were calculated using the surrogate standard 4,4'-dibromooctafluorobiphenyl so that the data can be compared to previously analyzed data.

h The percent recovery of the surrogate standard was calculated using tetrachloro-m-xylene as the internal standard.

i Standard reference material from the National Institute of Science and Technology.

j RSD is the relative standard deviation which is the standard deviation divided by the mean and expressed as a percent. 

Table of Contents
241.201 Policy. ( 1 ) DoD, as a matter of comity, generally complies with the current regulations, practices, and decisions of independent regulatory bodies. This policy does not extend to nonindependent regulatory bodies.
( 2 ) Purchases of utility services outside the United States may use— ( i ) Formats and technical provisions consistent with local practice; and
( ii ) Dual language forms and contracts.
( 3 ) Rates established by an independent regulatory body— ( i ) Are considered “prices set by law or regulation”;
( ii ) Are sufficient to set prices without obtaining certified cost or pricing data (see FAR subpart 15.4); and
( iii ) Are a valid basis on which prices can be determined fair and reasonable.
( 4 ) Compliance with the regulations, practices, and decisions of independent regulatory bodies as a matter of comity is not a substitute for the procedures at FAR 41.202(a).
[71 FR 3418, Jan. 23, 2006, as amended at 77 FR 76940, Dec. 31, 2012]
232.501-1 Customary progress payment rates. ( a ) The customary progress payment rates for DoD contracts, including contracts that contain foreign military sales (FMS) requirements, are 80 percent for large business concerns and 90 percent for small business concerns.
[79 FR 61582, Oct. 14, 2014]
Protecting StudentsDisability Discrimination

**Case Resolutions Regarding Disability Discrimination**	  Below are some OCR case resolutions that address civil rights  concerns related to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. This is a  partial, illustrative list of case resolutions. Case resolutions appearing here do not reflect their importance relative to other case resolutions that do not appear here. To see additional resolutions, click “More” below.

 

----

              - Horry County Schools     (SC) (11-19-5022)
              Read the Resolution Letter
PDF
Read the Resolution Agreement 
PDF

              - Los Angeles Unified School District       (CA) (09-21-5901)
              Read the Resolution        Letter 
PDF
Read the Resolution        Agreement 
PDF

              - Huron Valley Schools (MI)       (15-19-5002)
              Read the Resolution        Letter 
PDF
Read the Resolution        Agreement 
PDF

              - Saco School Department  (ME) (01-19-5001)
              Read the Resolution        Letter  
PDF
Read the Resolution        Agreement 
PDF

              - SAU #9 (NH) ( 01161260) 
              Read the Resolution Letter 
PDF
Read the Resolutions Agreement 
PDF

              - Akron Public Schools (OH) (15-15-1305)
              Read the Resolution        Letter  
PDF
Read the Resolution        Agreement  
PDF

              - **More Case Resolutions**

To access resolution documents created on or after October 1, 2013 click 	**here**or enter criteria in the search box below:          Keyword(s):   Last Modified: 08/29/2022