alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: LIBERTY REFUND ANTICIPATION

LOAN LITIGATION MDL No. 2334

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −3)

On April 16, 2012, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 5 additional action(s) have been

transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable Joan B Gottschall.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and assigned to

Judge Gottschall.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of April 16, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Joan B Gottschall.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

A TRUE COPY-ATTEST

THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK

 -

By: s/ ENJOLI FLETCHER

DEPUTY CLERK

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 -

June 15, 2012

Case: 1:12-cv-04687 Document #: 2 Filed: 06/15/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:29
IN RE: LIBERTY REFUND ANTICIPATION

LOAN LITIGATION MDL No. 2334

SCHEDULE CTO−3 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

MINNESOTA

MN 0 12−01309 Reyes v. JTH Holding, Inc. et al

Case: 1:12-cv-04687 Document #: 2 Filed: 06/15/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:30
#### 2407.102 Policy.

The Senior Procurement Executive is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal procedures that meet the criteria contained in FAR subpart 7.1 for acquisition planning and acquisition plan content.

[77 FR 73526, Dec. 10, 2012]
(November 26, 1963)

#### In the Matter of Lena Giannavola, Appellant, v. Jerry Horowitz, Judgment Debtor, and Lovee Doll & Toy Co., Inc., Respondent.

Order, entered on May 16, 1963, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed on the law, the facts being considered, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, the motion to confirm the Referee’s report to that extent denied, the report rejected, and appellant is directed to move for judgmnt as to the contents of safe-deposit box number 176. Box 176 was rented by the judgment debtor in his name, care of Lovee Doll & Toy Company, Inc., or Irwin Roth, six days after recovery of the judgment against him. All of the money was placed in the box at that time. The face of the envelopes has a notation of the amount of money contained there, with the name and return address of Lovee Doll & Toy Company, Inc., imprinted on each envelope. The judgment debtor was neither a stockholder nor officer of the doll company, but allegedly a salesman therefor who had access to the envelopes. He had no authority to sign corporate checks on the corporate account which was at another bank. Since the box was in the name of the judgment debtor, with Roth, his relative, having only a power of attorney, the possession of the contents is presumptive evidence of ownership in the judgment debtor *(Matter of Buckler,*227 App. Div. 146, 149; *Matter of Massey,*143 Mise. 794, 795; cf. *Matter of Gould,*6 Mise 2d 26). The presumption will yield to proof to the contrary but such proof must be clear and convincing and substantial in nature. The proof offered by the judgment debtor fails to meet the requisite standards. No books or corporate records were offered to support the claim that these were corporate funds. Nor was the accountant for the corporation produced. There was no credible explanation for this unusual method of handling these allegedly corporate funds. The only reasonable *885conclusion is, and. we so find, that title to these funds was in the judgment debtor. Settle order on notice. Ooneur Breitel, J. ,P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
27.305-1 Goals. ( a ) Contracts having a patent rights clause should be so administered that— ( 1 ) Inventions are identified, disclosed, and reported as required by the contract, and elections are made;
( 2 ) The rights of the Government in subject inventions are established;
( 3 ) When patent protection is appropriate, patent applications are timely filed and prosecuted by contractors or by the Government;
( 4 ) The rights of the Government in filed patent applications are documented by formal instruments such as licenses or assignments; and
( 5 ) Expeditious commercial utilization of subject inventions is achieved.
( b ) If a subject invention is made under a contract funded by more than one agency, at the request of the contractor or on their own initiative, the agencies shall designate one agency as responsible for administration of the rights of the Government in the invention.
#### 225.7015 Restriction on overseas architect-engineer services.

For restriction on award of architect-engineer contracts to be performed in Japan, in any North Atlantic Treaty Organization member country, or in countries bordering the Arabian Gulf, see 236.602-70.

[68 FR 15627, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 79 FR 44316, July 31, 2014; 80 FR 15911, Mar. 26, 2015]
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 41055 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Marco Antonio Perez**

**- Barrientos,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 7:19

- CR

- 1410

- 1

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Higginson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco Perez

Barrientos has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. Califor

nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez

- Barrientos has not filed a response.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opin

i on should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 21, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-41055 Document: 00515830568 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2021No. 19

- 41055

2 We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We concur with coun sel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo

lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to with

draw is **GRANTED** , coun sel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5 th**  **C ir**  **. R.** 42 .2

. Case: 19-41055 Document: 00515830568 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2021
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as
 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to the best of our
 knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, of CAPITAL
 REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the financial statements, fully complies with
 the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
 contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
 and results of operations of the small business issuer.

|               |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                            
|               |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                  
|               |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                           
|March 24, 2004 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                        
|DATE           |  | William B. Dockser,                  Director, Chairman of the Board,                  and Treasurer                  (Principal Executive Officer)
|March 24, 2004 |  | by:  /s/ Michael J. Tuszka                                                                                                                         
|DATE           |  | Michael J. Tuszka,                  Vice President                  and Chief Accounting Officer                  (Principal Financial Officer)    

This
 certification accompanies this annual report and is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose, and shall
 not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2017120EN.01001201.xml

| 13.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8412 — Engie Services Holding UK/Keepmoat Regeneration Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 120/04)

On 6 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8412. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8412. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

EverettMcKinley Dirksen UnitedStatesCourthouse

Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

CIRCUIT RULE 3(b) NOTICE

September 8, 2020

No. 20-2699

GRANT BIRCHMEIER, et al., on behalf of themselves and a class of

others similarly situated

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINE, INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants - Appellees

APPEAL OF: DAISY EXUM

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:12-cv-04069

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Clerk/Agency Rep Thomas G. Bruton

Circuit Rule 3(b) empowers the clerk to dismiss an appeal if the docket fee is not paid within

fourteen (14) days of the docketing of the appeal. This appeal was docketed on 

September 8, 2020. The District Court has indicated that as of September 8, 2020, the docket fee

has not been paid. Depending on your situation, you should:

1. Pay the required $500.00 docketing fee PLUS the $5.00 notice of appeal filing

fee to the District Court Clerk, if you have not already done so. The Court of

Appeals cannot accept this fee. You should keep a copy of the receipt for your

records.

2.

File a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the District Court,

if you have not already done so. An original and three (3) copies of that

motion, with proof of service on your opponent, is required. This motion

must be supported by a sworn affidavit in the form prescribed by Form 4 of

the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (as amended

Case: 20-2699 Document: 1-2 Filed: 09/08/2020 Pages: 2

Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 897 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:51683
12/01/2013), listing the assets and income of the appellant(s).

3. If the motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied by the district

court, you must either pay the required $500.00 docketing fee PLUS the $5.00

notice of appeal filing fee to the District Court Clerk, within fourteen (14) days

after service of notice of the action to the district court, or within thirty (30)

days of that date, renew your motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis

with this court.

If the motion is renewed in this court, it must comply with the terms of Fed.R.App.P. 24(a).

If one of the above stated actions is not taken, the appeal will be dismissed.

form name: c7_DC_Fee_Notice_Sent(form ID: 158)

Case: 20-2699 Document: 1-2 Filed: 09/08/2020 Pages: 2

Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 897 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:51684
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-04703 Document #: 9 Filed: 07/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:38
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.

      ( print page 7424)    

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of the OMB Final Sequestration Report to the President and Congress for FY 2021.

# SUMMARY:

                        OMB is issuing the                         *OMB Final Sequestration Report to the President and Congress for Fiscal Year 2021*                         to report on status of 2021 discretionary caps and compliance of enacted 2021 discretionary appropriations legislation with those caps.                    

# DATES:

January 19, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The OMB Sequestration Reports to the President and Congress are available on-line on the OMB home page at:                         *https://www.whitehouse.gov/​omb/​legislative/​sequestration-reports-orders/​.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Thomas Tobasko, 6202 New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, Email address:                         *ttobasko@omb.eop.gov,*                         telephone number: (202) 395-5745, FAX number: (202) 395-4768. Because of delays in the receipt of regular mail related to security screening, respondents are encouraged to use electronic communications.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 254 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to issue a Final Sequestration Report 15 calendar days after the end of a congressional session. This report meets that requirement and finds that, for fiscal year 2021, enacted appropriations are at or below the defense and non-defense caps after accounting for cap adjustments. As a result, a sequestration of discretionary budget authority is not required in 2021.

Russell T. Vought,

Director.

[FR Doc. 2021-01568 Filed 1-27-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,733
<SECURITIES>                                    27,983
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                       328
<INVENTORY>                                      1,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,421
<PP&E>                                           4,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,990
<SALES>                                         50,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,826
<CGS>                                           20,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   328
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,672)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,839)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 132 

Congratulating the Ashland University women’s basketball team for winning 

the 2017 National Collegiate Athletic Association division II championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2017 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

APRIL 27, 2017 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Ashland University women’s basketball 

team for winning the 2017 National Collegiate Athletic 

Association division II championship. 

Whereas the Ashland University Eagles won the 2017 National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this 

preamble as the ‘‘NCAA’’) division II women’s basketball 

championship game against the Virginia Union University Panthers at Alumni Hall on the campus of Ohio Dominican University by a score of 93 to 77; 

Whereas, with a record of 37–0, the Ashland University Eagles achieved the best record ever by an NCAA division 

II women’s team; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 132 ATS 

Whereas the 2017 NCAA championship was the second division II national championship for Ashland University 

during the last 5 years; 

Whereas head coach Robyn Fralick was named the 2017 

United States Marine Corps Women’s Basketball Coaches Association NCAA Division II Coach of the Year; 

Whereas assistant coach Kari Pickens was named the 2017 

Women’s Basketball Coaches Association NCAA Division 

II Assistant Coach of the Year; 

Whereas junior forwards Laina Snyder and Andi Daugherty 

were named Division II Conference Commissioner’s Association All-Americans; and 

Whereas Laina Snyder was named the Most Outstanding 

Player of the NCAA division II women’s basketball tournament: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Ashland University wom3 en’s basketball team on winning the 2017 National 

4 Collegiate Athletic Association division II champion5 ship; and 

6 (2) recognizes the contributions and achieve7 ments of each player, coach, and staff member of 

8 the Ashland University women’s basketball team 

9 who contributed to the 2016–2017 undefeated sea10 son. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS