alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NewFY23 Perkins Innovation and Modernization Grant Program
FY23 Perkins Innovation and Modernization Grant Program Intents to Apply

Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education (OCTAE) administers, coordinates programs that are related to adult education and literacy, career and technical education, and community colleges.

For the latest news and information about career and technical education and adult education, see the "OCTAE Connection newsletter" and the OCTAE Blog. 

### Adult Education and Literacy

The Division of Adult Education and Literacy is responsible for enabling adults to acquire the basic skills necessary to function in today's society so that they can benefit from the completion of secondary school, enhanced family life, attaining citizenship and participating in job training and retraining programs.

OCTAE's Adult Education and Literacy initiatives are designed to:

- Administering the Adult Education formula grant program to the States.
- Providing assistance to States to improve program quality, accountability and capacity.
- Establishing national leadership activities to enhance the quality of adult education.

### Career and Technical Education

The Division of Academic and Technical Education is responsible for helping all students acquire challenging academic and technical skills and be prepared for high-skill, high-wage, or high-demand occupations in the 21st century global economy.

OCTAE's Career and Technical Education initiatives are designed to:

- Administering state formula and discretionary grant programs under the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act (Perkins).
- Providing assistance to states to improve program quality, implementation, and accountability.
- Establishing national initiatives that help states implement rigorous career and technical education programs.

### Community College

OCTAE provides national leadership to strengthen the role of community colleges in expanding access to postsecondary education for youth and adults and advancing workforce development.

OCTAE's community college initiatives are designed to:

- Build public support for community colleges as centers of innovation and providers  of excellent education and training that are affordable and accessible to all Americans;
- Facilitate the dissemination of timely and actionable guidance on community college educations for teachers, administrators, students, parents, and employers; and
- Promote the development of strategies that support students in the completion of their postsecondary certification and degree programs.
#### 1836.513 Accident prevention.

For additional guidance on the use of FAR clause 52.236-13, Accident Prevention, and its Alternate I in NASA contracts, see 1823.7001(d).

[80 FR 36722, June 26, 2015]
#### 246.504 Certificate of conformance.

Before authorizing a certificate of conformance for aviation or ship critical safety items, obtain the concurrence of the head of the design control activity (see 209.270).

[73 FR 1828, Jan. 10, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 237 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 237

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2017

  Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

Whereas, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs conducted an investigation 
        into Internet sex trafficking;
Whereas, the Subcommittee has received a request from a federal law enforcement 
        agency for access to records of the Subcommittee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to 
provide to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and other 
entities or individuals duly authorized by federal or state 
governments, records of the Subcommittee's investigation into Internet 
sex trafficking.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; Phase II (Topic 166) Leveraging Health IT Solutions to Combat Opioid Misuse.                    

*Date:*                         February 12, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sheila Pirooznia, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Review, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9350,                         *sheila.pirooznia@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 15, 2021.

Tyeshia M. Roberson,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-01446 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 5 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2017 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. BALDWIN, 

Mr. BROWN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. REED, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. FRANKEN, 

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. UDALL, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KAINE, 

Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. WARNER, Ms. WARREN, Mr. SANDERS, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 

amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding any time limit contained in House 

4 Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed to in the 

5 Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment pro6 posed to the States in that joint resolution shall be valid 

7 to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 5 IS 

1 whenever ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of 

2 the several States. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Overview | **Guidelines** | Information Correction Requests and Appeals | Contact

----

## Guidelines

- Guidelines
- Information Correction Requests and Appeals 
- Review

The Branch Chief for the Information Management Branch will review the request and determine whether it contains all the information required for a complaint.If the request is unclear or incomplete, the Department will seek clarification from the requester.

If the request is clear and complete, the Branch Chief will forward it to the appropriate program office(s) for a response to the requester. The responsible office(s) will determine whether a correction is warranted, and if so, what corrective action it will take.  Any corrective action will be determined based on the nature and timeliness of the information involved, as well as the significance of the error on the use of the information, the magnitude of the error, and the cost of undertaking a correction.

Comments about information on which the Department has sought public comment, such as rulemaking or studies cited in a rulemaking, will be responded to through the public comment process, or through an individual response if there was no published process for responding to all comments. The Department may choose to provide an earlier response, if doing so is appropriate, and will not delay issuance of the final action in the matter.

The Department is not required to change the content or status of information simply based on the receipt of a request for correction. The Department may reject a request that appears to be made in bad faith or without justification, and is only required to undertake the degree of correction that is appropriate for the nature and timeliness of the information involved. In addition, the Department need not respond substantively to requests that concern information not covered by the information quality guidelines.

----

- Previous
- Table of Contents
- Next
1832.202-1 Policy. (NASA supplements paragraph (b)) ( b ) ( 6 ) Advance payment limitations do not apply to expendable launch vehicle (ELV) service contracts.
[61 FR 55768, Oct. 29, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 35271, June 24, 2004]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVA MARIA DURAN-CONRADO,

Petitioner,

 v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 17-73445

Agency No. A208-163-456

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 5, 2020** 

Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,***

District Judge.

 

Eva Maria Duran-Conrado, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the

FILED

JUN 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for

the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
decision of an immigration judge (IJ) denying her claims for asylum, withholding

of removal, and CAT relief.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny

the petition.

1. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Duran-Conrado

failed to establish that she was or would be persecuted by gang members because

she was a “woman in El Salvador.”2 Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s

conclusion that gang members did not just target women, but rather targeted all

business owners who the gang perceived had money, and persecuted those who

failed to pay the gang’s extortion money. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007,

1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An alien’s desire to be free from harassment by criminals

motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a

protected ground.”). Because Duran-Conrado points to no evidence in the record

that would compel a contrary conclusion, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478,

481 n.1 (1992), Duran-Conrado’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. 

2. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Duran-Conrado

is not eligible for CAT relief. See Zheng v. Ashcroft, 332 F.3d 1186, 1193, 1195

1

 Duran-Conrado’s daughter is a derivative applicant.

2

 The BIA assumed that Duran-Conrado’s proposed social group—“women

of El Salvador”—was cognizable; Duran-Conrado did not allege any other

protected ground as a basis for asylum.

2
(9th Cir. 2003). On this record, she has not shown a clear probability of torture if

removed to El Salvador by either government officials or private actors with

government acquiescence. See Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 836 (9th

Cir. 2016) (“[A] general ineffectiveness on the government’s part to investigate

and prevent crime will not suffice to show acquiescence.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3
§ 77.403 Mobile equipment; falling object protective structures (FOPS). ( a ) When necessary to protect the operator of the equipment, all rubber-tired or crawler-mounted self-propelled scrapers, front-end loaders, dozers, graders, loaders, and tractors, with or without attachments, that are used in surface coal mines or the surface work areas of underground coal mines shall be provided with substantial falling object protective structures (FOPS). FOPS which meet the requirements of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Standard J 231 shall be considered to be a “substantial” FOPS. An authorized representative of the Secretary may approve a FOPS which provides protection equivalent to SAE J 231.
( b ) When necessary to protect the operator of the equipment, forklift or powered industrial trucks shall be provided with substantial FOPS. Such FOPS shall meet the requirements of the State of California, Division of Industrial Safety, General Safety Orders, Register 72, Number 6, February 8, 1972, Article 25, Section 3655—“Overhead Guards for High-Lift Rider Trucks.”
(Sec. 101(a), Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended (83 Stat. 745; 30 U.S.C. 811(a))
[39 FR 24007, June 28, 1974]
#### Gainesville Railway & Power Co. *v.*Iowa Gold Mining Co.

November 14, 1912.

Petition, for injunction. Before Judge Jones. Lumpkin superior court. February 3, 1912.

*H. H. Dean,*for plaintiff.

*O. J. Lilly*and IF. *A. Charters,*for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

Under the pleadings and evidence in this case, it does not appear that there was any abuse of discretion in refusing the grant of an interlocutory injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11339]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Calder—Picasso” at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, de Young, San Francisco, California, at the High Museum of Art, Atlanta, Georgia, at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, Houston, Texas, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Matthew R. Lussenhop,

Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-01920 Filed 1-27-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### In the Matter of Stanislaw F. Mroczka, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[832 NYS2d 849]

Motion for order suspending respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.20 (e) denied as unnecessary. Present—Gorski, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 17 

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2017 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, 

or until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the mi2 nority party’s membership on the following committees for 

3 the One Hundredth Fifteenth Congress, or until their suc4 cessors are chosen: 

5 COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION: Ms. 

6 Klobuchar, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 

7 Udall, Mr. Warner, Mr. Leahy, Mr. King, Ms. Cortez 

8 Masto. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## FY 2022

Number of New Awards: TBAAverage of New Awards:	$TBATotal New Awards Funded: $TBA

FIPSE Home
#### Frederick May et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Owners of Plots or Graves Located at Washington Cemetery, Similarly Situated, et al., Respondents, v. Washington Cemetery, Appellant, and Cemetery Board of the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant.

In an action for a declaratory judgment and for an injunction by plaintiffs May and Novgrod, two owners of graves in the cemetery owned and operated by defendant Washington Cemetery, and by the plaintiff M. Goldsmith, Inc., a commercial gardening corporation which, upon the request of grave-owners, furnishes care and maintenance service on graves in said cemetery, the defendant Washington Cemetery and the intervening defendant, Cemetery Board of the State of New York, appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 25, 1961, upon the decision and opinion of the court after a nonjury trial, in plaintiffs’ favor, which: (1) adjudged null and void a resolution of said defendant Washington Cemetery to the extent that it adopted certain annual monetary charges to be imposed upon commercial gardeners, such as the plaintiff corporation, the said resolution having been approved by the intervening defendant, the Cemetery Board; (2) declared the rights of the individual plaintiffs and others similarly situated, and the rights of the corporate plaintiff; (3) dismissed the counterclaim of the defendant Washington Cemetery against the corporate plaintiff; and (4) enjoined said defendant from interfering with the plaintiffs in the exercise of their rights as declared in the judgment. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur. [29 Misc 2d 1046.]
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NMFS-NWFSC TM-9: Effectiveness of Predator Removal for Protecting Juvenile Fall Chinook Salmon Released from Bonneville Hatchery, 1991 
Figure 5. The study area showing northern squawfish catch per unit effort at each electrofishing transect area and proportion of tags (representing ingested juvenile salmon) from the 24 June Tanner Creek release group recovered in those northern squawfish, 1991. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text. 

Table of Contents