alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017031EN.01006001.xml

| 31.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/60

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 January 2017

(2017/C 31/11)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0630 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4375 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84935 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4390 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0669 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8758 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,022 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3310 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5008 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,0561 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4109 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3983 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2476 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4668 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5177 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 252,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4510 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3103 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4773 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 173,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7094 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,899 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,7792 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,492 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3318 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,0850 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,2315 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0630

JPY

Japanese yen

121,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4375

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84935

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4390

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0669

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8758

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,022

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3310

RON

Romanian leu

4,5008

TRY

Turkish lira

4,0561

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4109

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3983

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2476

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4668

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5177

KRW

South Korean won

1 252,27

ZAR

South African rand

14,4510

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3103

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4773

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 173,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7094

PHP

Philippine peso

52,899

RUB

Russian rouble

63,7792

THB

Thai baht

37,492

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3318

MXN

Mexican peso

22,0850

INR

Indian rupee

72,2315

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Samuel Martz, Respondent, and Morris L. Martz, Appellant, and Benjamin Martz, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal from order, dated January 19; 1960, granted, and appeal dismissed. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23(a)



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-68762,  33-74638,  33-86720, 33-91918, 33-93466,
33-64289, 333-15165,  333-26155,  333-46818,  333-47359,  333-62909,  333-80813,
333-82046,   333-106,344,   333-109946  and  333-110578)  and  Forms  S-8  (Nos.
333-38373, 333-64312, 333-96435, 333-92130, 333-97749) of Pharmos Corporation of
our report  dated  February 6, 2004  (except for the last  paragraph  of Note 19
which is dated March 3, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
February 6, 2004








                                      II-6
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications
NOAA-NMFS-NWFSC TM-31: Data Collection -- Groundfish 

Appendix A-2Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Receiving Ticket. This ticket reflects revisions through 1995 (e.g., black rockfish and canary rockfish have separate market categories).
To return to text, use your browser's Back button. Table of Contents
*Note:  These Congressional Budget Justifications do not include State tables. For the latest State tables, please visit the Department's State Tables page*.Volume I- Education for the Disadvantaged  PDF (1.4MB) 
- Impact Aid   PDF (1.2MB)
- School Improvement Programs  PDF (2.0MB)
- Safe Schools and Citizenship Education  PDF (2.0MB)
- Indian Education  PDF (1.2MB)  ****)
- Innovation and Improvement  PDF (1.9MB)
- English Language Acquisition  PDF (622KB)
- Special Education  PDF (1.6MB)
- Rehabilitation Services  PDF (1.9MB)
Volume II- American Printing House for the Blind  PDF (73KB)
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf  PDF (172KB)
- Gallaudet University  PDF (228KB)
- Career, Technical, and Adult Education  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Overview  PDF (232KB)
- Student Financial Assistance  PDF (1.8MB)
- TEACH Grants  PDF (1.0MB)
- Student Loans Overview  PDF (1.2MB)
- Higher Education  PDF (2.7MB)
- Howard University  PDF (222KB)
- College Housing and Academic Facilities Loans Program Account  PDF (162KB)
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program Account  PDF (301KB)
- Institute of Education Sciences  PDF (675KB)
- Salaries and Expenses Overview  PDF (553KB)
- Program Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Office for Civil Rights  PDF (474KB)
- Office of Inspector General  PDF (343KB)
- Information Technology System Modernization and Working Capital  PDF (343KB)
  Last Modified: 03/13/2019
#### 252.219-7005--252.219-7008 [Reserved]
2442.1107 Contract clause. ( a ) For purposes of clause 2452.242-71, the term “contract” shall also include task orders and purchase orders.
( b ) The Contracting Officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at 2452.242-71, Contract Management System, in solicitations and contracts when all of the following conditions apply: ( 1 ) A contract exceeds $1,000,000, including all options; and
( 2 ) The contract is a completion type that requires the delivery of an overall end deliverable or solution (*e.g.,* evaluation, study, model).
( c ) To the extent the clause will not normally be included in commercial contracts meeting the requirements stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, and in instances where the clause is to be incorporated, pursuant to FAR 12.301(f), a waiver to the standard commercial requirements, to include the clause, is not required.
( d ) The Contracting Officer shall use the basic clause for cost type, labor-hour, and time and materials contracts for the services described in paragraph (b) of this section. The clause shall be used with its alternate for fixed-price type contracts for the services described in paragraph (b). The Contracting Officer may elect to incorporate the clause into contracts below the established threshold.
( e ) The clause is not applicable to contracts that only expend a level of effort without a completion deliverable/product due, *e.g.,* temporary services.
( f ) This clause is not applicable to Information Technology service contracts being managed through Earned Value Management techniques that require reporting of Earned Value Management.
[84 FR 15129, Apr. 15, 2019]
#### Clara A. Popplewell, Appellant, v. Ernest E. Clark, Respondent.

— Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and in the interest of justice, with costs, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: During the course of the trial the defendant’s attorney called Mr. Levy, plaintiff’s attorney, to the stand and cross-examined him about the name of a person whom the defendant’s attorney claimed was a witness to this accident. The plaintiff’s attorney said that he did not know the name of such a witness, but he had heard that there was one. The defendant’s attorney then, without foundation, assumed that there was such a witness and made it appear to the jury that the plaintiff’s attorney was deliberately withholding the name of the witness. A Mr. Short, an insurance adjuster, was brought into the examination and Mr. Levy was asked if he or his client would authorize Short to furnish the name of any witness to this accident that he might know of. The record does not establish that there was such a witness, or, if there was, that the plaintiff’s attorney knew his name. The examination itself and the manner in which it was conducted was highly improper, and unfairly suggestive of evasive conduct by Mr. Levy. There was an effort to impugn the attitude of Mir. Levy as one of improper concealment under oath. We find that the calling of the witness, the examination itself, and the implications created thereby were so highly prejudicial as to require reversal and a new trial. (Appeal from judgment of Ontario Trial Term dismissing the complaint in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from order denying a motion for a new trial.) Present—Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
#### 2052.215-73 Award notification and commitment of public funds.

As prescribed at 2015.209-70 (a)(4), the contracting officer shall insert the following clause in applicable solicitations:

# Award Notification and Commitment of Public Funds (OCT 1999)

(a) All offerors will be notified of their exclusion from the competitive range in accordance with FAR 15.503(a)(1). Under the requirements of FAR 15.503(a)(2), preliminary notification will be provided before award for small business set-aside procurements on negotiated procurements. The contracting officer shall provide written postaward notice to each unsuccessful offeror in accordance with FAR 15.503(b).

(b) The contracting officer is the only individual who can legally commit the NRC to the expenditure of public funds in connection with this procurement. This means that, unless provided in a contract document or specifically authorized by the contracting officer, NRC technical personnel may not issue contract modifications, give informal contractual commitments, or otherwise bind, commit, or obligate the NRC contractually. Informal contractual commitments include:

(1) Encouraging a potential contractor to incur costs before receiving a contract;

(2) Requesting or requiring a contractor to make changes under a contract without formal contract modifications;

(3) Encouraging a contractor to incur costs under a cost-reimbursable contract in excess of those costs contractually allowable; and

(4) Committing the Government to a course of action with regard to a potential contract, contract change, claim, or dispute.

(End of clause)
DYCK-O’NEAL, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

ANGELLA MASSA & JOSEPH 

MASSA, 

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4350

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 16, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

James H. Daniels, Judge.

David M. Snyder, David M. Snyder Professional Association, Tampa; Susan B. 

Morrison of the Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa; and Daniel C. 

Consuegra, Chad W. Howard, and Joshua D. Moore of the Law Offices of Daniel 

C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.

Catrina H. Markwalter and J. Morgan Foster, Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Jacksonville, 

for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for 
2

deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a 

deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a 

deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So. 3d 802 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court’s decision in Higgins and 

decisions by the other four district courts of appeal). 

ROBERTS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### 225.770-2 Prohibition.

Do not acquire items covered by the USML or the 600 series of the CCL, through a contract or subcontract at any tier, from any Communist Chinese military company. This prohibition does not apply to components and parts of covered items unless the components and parts are themselves covered by the USML or the 600 series of the CCL.

[83 FR 66072, Dec. 21, 2018]
#### National Broadcasting Company, Inc., Respondent, v Fire Craft Services, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Summit Security Services, Inc., Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 903]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered November 6, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied that part of the motion of defendant Summit Security Services, Inc. (Summit) requesting that all issues in the case be adjudicated at a unified trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

On a prior appeal we upheld the motion court’s determina*288tion to adjudicate this case by means of a bifurcated trial, and, in so doing, rejected the contention that “the question of whether and to what extent losses would have been avoided by the use of a fire watch or equivalent safety equipment by one or more of the parties raises issues of liability and damages that are so interrelated and so pervasive as to necessitate a unitary trial” (292 AD2d 192, 193 [2002]). While three of the four consolidated actions have since settled, we are not persuaded that the motion court’s rationale for bifurcation *(see id.)*is no longer valid.

We have considered Summit’s remaining contention and find it unavailing. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Williams, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
225.7023-1 Definitions. As used in this section— *Covered item* means an article or item of— ( 1 ) Personal protective equipment for use in preventing spread of disease, such as by exposure to infected individuals or contamination or infection by infectious material, including— ( i ) Nitrile and vinyl gloves;
( ii ) Surgical masks;
( iii ) Respirator masks and powered air purifying respirators and required filters;
( iv ) Face shields and protective eyewear;
( v ) Surgical and isolation gowns and head and foot coverings; or
( vi ) Clothing; and
( vii ) The materials and components thereof, other than sensors, electronics, or other items added to and not normally associated with such personal protective equipment or clothing; or
( 2 ) Sanitizing and disinfecting wipes, testing swabs, gauze, and bandages.
H H

H H

H H

î

î

î î î

î " "

" "

"

"

10

10

10

MANOR DR

WESTMINSTER DR

ARGYLE DR

RONECK CT

PECONIC DR

CRANBERRY DR

VIOLET RD

FIRE ISLAND BEACH RD

IRIS RD

HICKORY RD

SHERIDAN

DR

WILLIAM FLOYD PKWY

RIVIERA DR

E CONCOURSE

TRAFALGAR DR

SEYMOUR DR

ROBINSON DR

PETERS DR

LA

STANLEY DR

FAYETTE DR

LOMBARDY DR

FIRE ISLAND BEACH RD

HARRISON DR

KENT DR

NEW YORK

NEW YORK

MASTIC

BEACH

SUFFOLK CO

SUFFOLK CO

Jo

h

ns Neck

Cr

Jo

hns Ne

ck

Cr

Sheepen Cr

Pattersquash Cr

Unchachoque Cr

ATLANTIC

OCEAN

ATLANTIC

OCEAN

ATLANTIC

OCEAN

Pattersquash

Island

Smith Point

Johns

Neck

Narrow

Bay

Pattersquash

Island

Howells

Point

Bellport Moriches Eastport

45

6

45

6

000m

6

000

11

45

06

05

E 87

45

45

6

000m

88

45

72°

89

45

42'

E 50'

40°

45

45

6

08

89

45

45

00

40°

40'

82

02

72°

87 30"

84 86

03

45

12

45

11

300

05

170

84

09

000m 83

210

47'

000

6

45

07

6

6

N

45

81

45

88

37'

45

6 50'

45

30"

30"

30"

6

13

6

6

85

1

10

6

08

FEET

10

FEET

07

6

83

45

40° 40°

72°

45

45' 86

01

6

XL

45

04

45'

30"

13

330

90

03

42'

85

6

06

04

6

02

N

00

XK

47'

72°

XL

6

6 82 000 FEET

6

45

45

45' 000m

45

000 FEET

45

XK

37'

40'

45'

30"

52'30"

52' 30"

80

80

45

09

45

1

01

NEW

YORK

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

PATTERSQUASH ISLAND QUADRANGLE

NEW YORK-SUFFOLK CO.

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

PATTERSQUASH ISLAND, NY

2013

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WXInterstate Route /. US Route H State Route

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Imagery...................................................NAIP, May 2011

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2012

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2011

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 1998

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 18T

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: New York Coordinate System of 1983 (long

island zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.7

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

XL

XK

45

00

18T

×

Ø

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2013 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 25 ́

25 MILS

13° 40 ́

243 MILS
#### 252.227-7023 Drawings and other data to become property of Government.

As prescribed at 227.7107-1(b), use the following clause:

# Drawings and Other Data to Become Property of Government (MAR 1979)

All designs, drawings, specifications, notes and other works developed in the performance of this contract shall become the sole property of the Government and may be used on any other design or construction without additional compensation to the Contractor. The Government shall be considered the “person for whom the work was prepared” for the purpose of authorship in any copyrightable work under 17 U.S.C. 201(b). With respect thereto, the Contractor agrees not to assert or authorize others to assert any rights nor establish any claim under the design patent or copyright laws. The Contractor for a period of three (3) years after completion of the project agrees to furnish all retained works on the request of the Contracting Officer. Unless otherwise provided in this contract, the Contractor shall have the right to retain copies of all works beyond such period.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 33505, June 28, 1995]
# C_2016424EN.01000101.xml

| 18.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/1

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.8158 — METRO/Colruyt France)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 424/01)

On 13 October 2016, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between METRO AG and Colruyt France SAS. On 3 November 2016, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.

---
Exhibit 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Simon K Gill , Chief Executive Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

1.   The company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
     June 30, 2004 ("Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

2.   All of the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
     of the company.



Date: August 13, 2004                      /x/ Simon K. Gill
                                           ------------------------------------
                                               Simon K. Gill
                                               Chief Executive Officer
#### 252.222-7004 Compliance with Spanish social security laws and regulations.

As prescribed in 222.7201(c), use the following clause:

# Compliance with Spanish Social Security Laws and Regulations (JUN 1997)

(a) The Contractor shall comply with all Spanish Government social security laws and regulations. Within 30 calendar days after the start of contract performance, the Contractor shall ensure that copies of the documents identified in paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this clause are available at all reasonable times for inspection by the Contracting Officer or an authorized representative. The Contractor shall retain the records in accordance with the Audit and Records clause of this contract.

(1) TC1—Certificate of Social Security Payments;

(2) TC2—List of Employees;

(3) TC2/1—Certificate of Social Security Payments for Trainees;

(4) Nominal (pay statements) signed by both the employee and the Contractor; and

(5) Informa de Situacion de Empressa (Report of the Condition of the Enterprise) from the Ministerio de Trabajo y S.S., Tesoreria General de la Seguridad Social (annotated with the pertinent contract number(s) next to the employee's name).

(b) All TC1's, TC2's, and TC2/1's shall contain a representation that they have been paid by either the Social Security Administration office or the Contractor's bank or savings institution. Failure by the Contractor to comply with the requirements of this clause may result in termination of the contract under the clause of the contract entitled “Default.”

(End of clause)

[62 FR 34129, June 24, 1997]
#### 247.305-10 Packing, marking, and consignment instructions.

Follow the procedures at PGI 247.305-10 for preparation of consignment instructions.

[75 FR 51417, Aug. 20, 2010]
22.103-3 Procedures. ( a ) Solicitations normally shall not specify delivery or performance schedules that may require overtime at Government expense.
( b ) In negotiating contracts, contracting officers should, consistent with the Government's needs, attempt to ( 1 ) ascertain the extent that offers are based on the payment of overtime and shift premiums and
( 2 ) negotiate contract prices or estimated costs without these premiums or obtain the requirement from other sources.
( c ) When it becomes apparent during negotiations of applicable contracts (see 22.103-5(b)) that overtime will be required in contract performance, the contracting officer shall secure from the contractor a request for all overtime to be used during the life of the contract, to the extent that the overtime can be estimated with reasonable certainty. The contractor's request shall contain the information required by paragraph (b) of the clause at 52.222-2, Payment for Overtime Premiums.
EPA VERR# 4250 Received: August 5, 2011EPA VERR# 4250 Received: August 5, 2011EPA VERR# 4250 Received: August 5, 2011
#### 225.7022-2 Definitions.

As used in this section—

*Forced labor* means any work or service that is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty for nonperformance and that the worker does not offer to perform (10 U.S.C. 2496).

*XUAR* means the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People's Republic of China (10 U.S.C. 2496).

[88 FR 37797, June 9, 2023]