alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Paul Stawski et al., Appellants, v Joseph Epstein, Respondent.

In an action to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of certain residential premises, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 22, 1978, which, after a nonjury *682trial, dismissed their complaint. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, judgment granted in favor of plaintiffs, and action remitted to Trial Term for entry of an appropriate judgment in accordance herewith. Defendant contracted to sell his house to plaintiffs. Before the closing date arrived, defendant changed his mind and so informed plaintiffs. The present action was then instituted. Actual tender of performance by plaintiffs was not necessary since defendant had, in effect, repudiated the contract (see *Baumann v Pinckney,*118 NY 604; see, also, 55 NY Jur, Specific Performance, § 29). Under these circumstances, in order to obtain the relief of specific performance, plaintiffs had to show a readiness and ability to perform their obligation under the contract (see *Spuches v Royal View,*23 Mise 2d 878, mod on other grounds 13 AD2d 523, amd 13 AÚ2d 815). Trial Term acknowledged plaintiffs’ readiness to perform, but found them lacking the financial ability to make the final payment. In this regard, Trial Term erred; it looked only to plaintiffs’ actual cash in hand and ignored all other assets. The record makes clear that plaintiffs were possessed of sufficient assets (savings and checking accounts, mutual funds, a house, and the potential of obtaining a mortgage on the house in question) to make whatever payments were necessary. Accordingly, plaintiffs are entitled to specific performance of the contract. Mollen, P. J., O’Connor, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
#### 237.173-4 Waiver.

The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in 237.173-3(a) for a period of 60 days, if the Secretary determines such a waiver is vital to the national security interests of the United States. The Secretary may renew a waiver issued pursuant to this paragraph for an additional 30-day period, if the Secretary determines that such a renewal is vital to the national security interests of the United States. Not later than five days after issuance of the waiver, the Secretary shall submit written notification to Congress. See specific waiver procedures at DoDI 1100.22.

[75 FR 67633, Nov. 3, 2010]
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

C ity of Philadelphia

, :

:

v. :

:

Leslie Nelson

, : No. 1479 C.D. 2021

Appellant :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2 nd d ay of Ju ly , 20 2 4

, it is ORDERED that the

above

- captioned opinion filed May 9, 2024

, shall be designated OPINION

rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

___________________________ _____ ANNE E. COVEY, Judge
# C_2017120EN.01001301.xml

| 13.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 April 2017

(2017/C 120/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0605 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5553 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0678 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1035 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,697 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,97 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2485 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5205 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,8965 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4163 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4114 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2416 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5320 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4869 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 209,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5185 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3090 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4385 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 087,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6954 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,446 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 60,5067 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,555 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3330 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9384 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,5895 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0605

JPY

Japanese yen

116,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84840

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5553

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0678

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1035

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,697

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,97

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2485

RON

Romanian leu

4,5205

TRY

Turkish lira

3,8965

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4163

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4114

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2416

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5320

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4869

KRW

South Korean won

1 209,26

ZAR

South African rand

14,5185

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3090

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4385

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 087,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6954

PHP

Philippine peso

52,446

RUB

Russian rouble

60,5067

THB

Thai baht

36,555

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3330

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9384

INR

Indian rupee

68,5895

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Cascade Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ ROBERT C. WARREN, JR.
|Robert C. Warren, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer  
|June 6, 2011             
|                         
|/s/ JOSEPH G. POINTER    
|Joseph G. Pointer        
|Chief Financial Officer  
|June 6, 2011
#### 239.7602 Policy and responsibilities.
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5633
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:5634
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:5635
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:5636
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:5637
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:5638
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:5639
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:5640
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:5641
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:5642
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:5643
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-4 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:5644
#### 23.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes acquisition policies and procedures supporting the Government's program to protect and improve the quality of the environment, to foster markets for sustainable products and services, and to ensure proper handling and notification of hazardous materials.

[89 FR 30238, Apr. 22, 2024]
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 47 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 6157, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following corrections: 

5 (1) Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘Making 

6 consolidated appropriations for the Departments of 

7 Defense, Labor, Health and Human Services, and 

8 Education, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year 

9 ending September 30, 2019, and for other pur10 poses.’’. 

11 (2) In section 101(4) of division C, strike ‘‘31’’ 

12 and insert ‘‘141’’. 

Passed the Senate September 18, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 47 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

6157. to make a correction in the enrollment of H.R.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 35

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2017

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy of the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson of New York on May 5, 2017, is filled 
by the appointment of Michael Govan of California. The appointment is 
for a term of 6 years, beginning on May 6, 2017, or the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later.

            Passed the Senate March 27, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ) 

NORTHERN ILLINOIS BENEFIT FUND, ) 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ) 

NORTHERN ILLINOIS PENSION FUND, ) 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ) 

NORTHERN ILLINOIS EDUCATION ) 

FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ) No. 12 C 2197 

THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS ) 

RETIREMENT FUND, ) Judge Lee 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Magistrate Judge Valdez 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

ALEXANDER GAMMIE ASSOCIATES ) 

PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY, ) 

an Illinois corporation, and ) 

FRANK E. HEROUT, Individually, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN SUM CERTAIN

NOW COME the Plaintiffs, the BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE NORTHERN 

ILLINOIS BENEFIT FUNDS, by and through their attorneys, ANDREW S. PIGOTT, 

DONALD D. SCHWARTZ, and ARNOLD & KADJAN, and, in their Motion for Judgment in 

Sum Certain, state as follows: 

1. Plaintiff Trustees filed their Complaint against Defendants, ALEXANDER 

GAMMIE ASSOCIATES PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY, and FRANK E. HEROUT, 

on March 26, 2012. 

2. In Count One of the Complaint, Plaintiffs sought an award of delinquent 

contributions contained in an Installment Note signed by both Defendants. 

3. In Count Two of the Complaint, Plaintiffs sought an order compelling Defendant 
2

to submit to a fringe benefit contributions audit for the period January 1, 2011 through the 

present, and for judgment for any amounts determined to be due to Plaintiffs by the auditor. 

4. Defendants failed to answer the Complaint and this Court granted Plaintiffs 

judgment against both Defendants for the balance of the contributions due under the Installment 

Note, and entered an order compelling Defendant ALEXANDER GAMMIE to submit to audit. 

(See Ex. A). 

 5. Defendant, ALEXANDER GAMMIE, has submitted to the audit ordered by the 

Court. 

 6. According to Plaintiffs’ auditor, Defendant owes the Plaintiffs $28,278.38 in 

delinquent contributions, liquidated damages, and audit costs. (See Ex. B). 

 7. According to the Affidavit of Andrew S. Pigott, the Plaintiff Funds have incurred 

$3,812.50 in attorneys’ fees since their initial Motion for Default Judgment & Order Compelling 

ERISA Fringe Benefit Contribution Audit. (See Ex. C). 

 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs ask this Court to enter the Order attached to their Motion as 

Exhibit D. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NORTHERN 

ILLINOIS BENEFIT FUND, et al. 

 BY: s/Andrew S. Pigott 

 One of Plaintiffs Attorneys 

Donald D. Schwartz 

Andrew S. Pigott 

ARNOLD AND KADJAN 

203 N. LaSalle St., Ste. 1650 

Chicago, Illinois 60601 

(312) 236-0415 

apigott@arnoldandkadjan.com 

dds3662@yahoo.com
232.806 Contract clauses. ( a ) ( 1 ) Use the clause at 252.232-7008, Assignment of Claims (Overseas), instead of the clause at FAR 52.232-23, Assignment of Claims, in solicitations and contracts when contract performance will be in a foreign country.
( 2 ) Use Alternate I with the clause at FAR 52.232-23, Assignment of Claims, unless otherwise authorized under 232.803(d).
[62 FR 34126, June 24, 1997]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50629

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GREGORIO MENDEZ-CHAVEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-129-ALL-AML

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gregorio MendezChavez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
147

Appendix IV. 

Time series of monthly mean sea level 

after removal of seasonal cycle and linear trend

Note: Vertical solid lines indicate times of major earthquakes. Dashed vertical lines

indicate beginning and end of periods of suspect data.
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
On November 26, 2012,  OCR closed a complaint against the University of Missouri – Columbia  (University or MU) alleging discrimination on the basis of race.  Specifically, the complainant alleged the  University administers a range of racially exclusive programs and that these  were *per se*discriminatory. OCR  analyzed the University’s policies and practices for administering scholarship  programs under Title VI and the Department’s “Notice of final policy guidance  on the use of race and national origin in student financial aid programs,  Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs; Title VI of the Civil Rights  Act of 1964,” 59 Fed. Reg. 8756 (February 23, 1994) (1994 Guidance).  Specifically, OCR analyzed the evidence to  determine whether the University met its burden of showing that its use of race  and national origin in grant and scholarship programs was narrowly tailored to  achieve the University’s compelling interest in diversity, in accordance with  Principle 4 of the 1994 Guidance. OCR determined that the university’s use of  race met narrow tailoring requirements.  
     ***Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF (230K)
Top  Last Modified: 01/15/2020
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 18 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the final rule submitted by the Department of the 

Interior relating to Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the final rule submitted 

by the Department of the Interior relating to Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and 

Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 

Alaska. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the final rule submitted by the 

4 Department of the Interior relating to Non-Subsistence 

5 Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure 

6 Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska (81 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 18 IS 

1 Fed. Reg. 52248 (August 5, 2016)), and such rule shall 

2 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7583

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

A. LEE ERVIN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-95-1026-R)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Turner v. Ervin, No. CA-95-1026-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 20 and 28, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant's

motion to consolidate cases is denied.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 261 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 261

    Recognizing the month of September 2017 as ``Alaska Wild Salmon 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2017

Ms. Murkowski submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the month of September 2017 as ``Alaska Wild Salmon 
                                Month''.

Whereas the sustainable Alaska wild salmon commercial fishery contributes over 
        38,000 jobs and nearly $2,000,000,000 in annual labor income to the 
        United States economy;
Whereas the commercial Alaska wild salmon harvest comprises approximately 50 
        percent of the wild salmon caught worldwide;
Whereas the sport fishing industry of the State of Alaska generates $500,000,000 
        in economic output and creates 4,500 jobs annually;
Whereas wild salmon returning to Alaskan streams and rearing young in Alaskan 
        water are the basis for one of the most valuable and important 
        industries of the State of Alaska;
Whereas commercial and sport salmon fishing and processing provides the greatest 
        number of private-sector employment opportunities in the State of 
        Alaska;
Whereas many Alaskans depend heavily on subsistence-caught wild salmon for food 
        and cultural purposes;
Whereas Alaska Natives have relied on Alaska wild salmon for thousands of years, 
        and Alaska wild salmon continues to comprise up to 70 percent of the 
        subsistence harvest of many Alaska Native communities; and
Whereas, in September 2017, Alaska Wild Salmon Month celebrates and raises 
        awareness nationwide regarding the contributions of Alaska wild salmon 
        to the health and economy of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes September 2017 as ``Alaska Wild Salmon 
        Month''; and
            (2) encourages individuals, corporations, and other 
        relevant organizations to celebrate the sustainable Alaska wild 
        salmon industry and the health and social benefits Alaska wild 
        salmon provide to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
252.204-7024 Notice on the Use of the Supplier Performance Risk System. As prescribed in 204.7604, use the following provision: Notice on the Use of the Supplier Performance Risk System (MAR 2023) (a) *Definitions.* As used in this provision— *Item risk* means the probability that a product, based on intended use, will introduce performance risk resulting in safety issues, mission degradation, or monetary loss. *Price risk* means a measure of whether a proposed price for a product or service is consistent with historical prices paid for that item or service. *Supplier risk* means the probability that an award may subject the procurement to the risk of unsuccessful performance or to supply chain risk (see Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 239.7301). (b) The Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), available at *https://piee.eb.mil/ ,* will be used in the evaluation of the Quoter or Offeror's performance. SPRS retrieves item, price, quality, delivery, and contractor information on contracts from Government reporting systems in order to develop risk assessments. (c) The Contracting Officer will consider SPRS risk assessments during the evaluation of quotations or offers received in response to this solicitation as follows: (1) Item risk will be considered to determine whether the procurement represents a high performance risk to the Government. (2) Price risk will be considered in determining if a proposed price is consistent with historical prices paid for a product or a service or otherwise creates a risk to the Government. (3) Supplier risk, including but not limited to quality and delivery, will be considered to assess the risk of unsuccessful performance and supply chain risk. (d) SPRS risk assessments are generated daily. Quoters or Offerors are able to access their risk assessments by following the access instructions in the SPRS user's guide available at *https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/reference.htm .* Quoters and Offerors are granted access to SPRS for their own risk assessment classifications only. SPRS reporting procedures and risk assessment methodology are detailed in the SPRS user's guide. The method to challenge a rating generated by SPRS is also provided in the user's guide. SPRS evaluation criteria are available at *https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_DataEvaluationCriteria.pdf .* (e) The Contracting Officer may consider any other available and relevant information when evaluating a quotation or an offer.
(End of provision) [88 FR 17339, Mar. 22, 2023]