alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016474EN.01000301.xml

| 17.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 474/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 474/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 December 2016

(2016/C 474/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0439 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4340 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7890 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0751 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0623 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,45 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4200 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5165 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,6601 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4239 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3960 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1032 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4892 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5065 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 239,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5876 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2635 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5360 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 977,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6715 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,193 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,3017 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,413 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5081 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2528 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7765 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0439

JPY

Japanese yen

123,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4340

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83890

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7890

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0751

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0623

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,45

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4200

RON

Romanian leu

4,5165

TRY

Turkish lira

3,6601

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4239

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3960

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1032

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4892

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5065

KRW

South Korean won

1 239,53

ZAR

South African rand

14,5876

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2635

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5360

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 977,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6715

PHP

Philippine peso

52,193

RUB

Russian rouble

64,3017

THB

Thai baht

37,413

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5081

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2528

INR

Indian rupee

70,7765

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### 23.500 Scope of subpart.

This subpart addresses public disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions and reduction goals.
#### 19.809-1 Preaward survey.

The contracting officer should request a preaward survey of the 8(a) participant whenever considered useful. If the results of the preaward survey or other information available to the contracting officer raise substantial doubt as to the participant's ability to perform, the contracting officer shall refer the matter to SBA for Certificate of Competency consideration under subpart 19.6.

[85 FR 11765, Feb. 27, 2020]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 64948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26965]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Notice of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board 
Membership

    The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces the 
appointment of members to the AHRQ Senior Executive Service (SES) 
Performance Review Board (PRB). This action is being taken in 
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), which requires notice of 
appointment of members to performance review boards to be published in 
the Federal Register.
    Members of the PRB are appointed in a manner that will ensure 
consistency, stability and objectivity in the SES performance 
appraisals. The function of the PRB is to make recommendations to the 
Director, AHRQ, relating to the performance of senior executives in the 
Agency.
    The following persons will serve on the AHRQ SES Performance Review 
Board:

Irene Fraser, Stephen B. Cohen, William Munier, David Meyers, Michael 
Fitzmaurice, Phyllis Zucker, Mark Handelman, Jean Slutsky.

    For further information about the AHRQ Performance Review Board, 
contact Ms. Alison Reinheimer, Office of Performance, Accountability, 
Resources, and Technology, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 
540 Gaither Road, Suite 4012, Rockville, Maryland 20850.

    Dated: October 2, 2011.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director, AHRQ.
[FR Doc. 2011-26965 Filed 10-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 47,241

#### *In re*The Complaint made against Ronald Kaarbo by the State Board of Law Examiners.

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

Whereas, In a proceeding conducted by the State Board of Law Examiners to inquire into the complaint of alleged professional misconduct by Ronald Kaarbo, and

Whereas, Following a full hearing as to such complaint, the State Board of Law Examiners found that Ronald Kaarbo, Liberal, Kansas, was guilty of violating DR 1-102 (A) (5 and 6), DR 6-101 (A) (3), and DR 7-101 (A) (2 and 3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility (209 Kan. Ixxiv, Ixxxiv), and

Whereas, The State Board of Law Examiners has made a written recommendation to this Court that said Ronald Kaarbo be disciplined by “Suspension of the practice of law for an indefinite period” as provided by Rule No. 207 *(n)*(3), (211 Kan. ix), and

Whereas, A copy of the Report, Findings and Recommendations of the Board, along with the citation, was mailed to Ronald Kaarbo by certified mail and was returned to the Clerk of the Supreme Court unopened and marked “Unclaimed,” and since more than twenty (20) days have passed since the citation was mailed, the matter stands submitted on the merits in accordance with Rule No. 208 (c) (211 Kan. ix), and

Whereas, Upon consideration of the record and being fully advised in the premises, the Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners.

It is, therefore, by the Court Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that the said Ronald Kaarbo be and he is hereby disciplined by this Court by suspension of the practice of law for an indefinite period, and that he pay the costs of the proceeding. It is further ordered that this Order of Suspension be published in the official Kansas Reports.

By order of the Court, dated this 26th day of September, 1973.
23.108-3 Products and services that are subject to EPA Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels. ( a ) *Program.* The EPA Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP) Program helps Federal agencies identify and procure environmentally preferable products and services to meet zero emissions and other sustainable procurement goals by providing Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels. The EPP recommendations give preference to multi-attribute or life-cycle based standards and ecolabels that address key environmental and human health impact areas and where product conformance is determined by a competent third-party certification body.
( b ) *Resource.* For additional information on EPA Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels, see *https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/recommendations-specifications-standards-and-ecolabels-federal-purchasing .*
#### 1842.7002 Travel outside of the United States.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.242-71, Travel Outside of the United States, in cost-reimbursement solicitations and contracts where a contractor may travel outside of the United States and it is appropriate to require Government approval of the travel.

[81 FR 24501, Apr. 26, 2016]
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-03516 Document #: 5 Filed: 05/10/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:12
#### Rose Kallus et al., Respondents, v. Isidore Wallach et al., Appellants.

In an action by a tenant of a multipule dwelling against her landlords to recover damages for personal injury allegedly sustained in a fall upon *843unlighted public stairs of the premises, and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 20, 1962 after trial, upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants contend only that in the happening of the accident the injured plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### FOX v. DAVIDSON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 9, 1906.)

Mechanics’ Liens—Judgment—Interest—Unliquidated Demand.

Where, in an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien, the amount of plaintiff’s claim depended, among other things, on the reasonable value of certain work, labor, and materials embraced in the contract, but unperformed by the contractor, and the precise amount due was neither fixed nor ascertainable by mere mathematical calculation, the demand was not liquidated, and therefore did not draw interest.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see voi. 29, Cent. Dig. Interest, §§ 35— 40; vol. 34, Cent. Dig. Mechanics’ Liens, § 283.]

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action by Henry E. Fox against Isaac Davidson. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Modified.

Argued before O’BRIEN, P. I., and INGRAHAM, LAUGHLIN, CLARKE, and HOUGHTON, JJ.

Henry A. Forster, for appellant.

Edmund L. Mooney, for respondent.

LAUGHLIN, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. It is said to have been before this court in one phase or another six times, and attention is drawn to three opinions on appeal herein. 36 App. Div. 159, 55 N. Y. Supp. 524; 40 App. Div. 620, 58 N. Y. Supp. 147; 65 App. Div. 262, 73 N. Y. Supp. 533. The law of the case under the amended complaint is well settled. We do not deem it important on this appeal to review either the facts or the law on the main issues, for the reason that the trial involved the application of facts found to settled principles of law with respect to the right to recover in such an action when full and substantial performance has been waived or prevented by the defendant, and the excuse for nonperformance has 'been properly pleaded, and where the lien as filed was excessive, but the claim was not willfully exaggerated. We have considered all of the points presented by the appellant, and have reached the conclusion that the learned trial justice properly decided the issues in all respects, except in allowing a recovery for interest. In his amended complaint plaintiff demanded judgment for $7,355 principal and interest thereon. His recovery was for only $5,484.90. The amount of the plaintiff’s claim depended upon, among other things, the reasonable value of certain work, labor, and material embraced in the contract, but left unperformed by the contractor. This required proof both as to the items of work not done and the fair value of performing the same according to the contract. The precise amount due to the plaintiff was neither fixed nor could it be ascertained by a mere mathematical calculation; and therefore it cannot be said that the claim was liquidated and drew interest. Excelsior Terra Cotta Co. v. Harde, 90 App. Div. 4, 85 N. Y. Supp. 732, affirmed 181 N. Y. 11, 73 N. E. 494.

It follows that the judgment should be modified, by reducing the recovery by $2,594.34, the amount of interest allowed, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. All concur.
#### Rufus Hatch, Respondent, *v.*The Western Union Telegraph Company, Appellant. William S. Williams, Respondent, *v.*The Western Union Telegraph Company, Appellant.

(Submitted January 15, 1883 ;

decided October 2, 1883.)

These were appeals from orders of General Term affirming orders of Special Term granting preliminary injunctions in the actions above entitled.

The mem. of opinion is as follows:

“ The orders in these cases are not appealable. The rule is well settled that the granting or refusing of an injunction *pendente lite*is in the discretion of the court of original jurisdiction, subject-to review by the General Term, which is the final appellate jurisdiction. ( *Van Dewater*v. Kelsey, 1 Comst. 533; *Paul*v. *Munger,*47 N. Y. *469; Calkin*v. *Manhattan Oil Co.,*65 id. 557.)

“ There is an exception where it plainly appears upon the face of the complaint that the case is one in which, by settled adjudications, the plaintiff, upon the facts stated, is not entitled to final relief. The granting of an injunction *pendente lite*in such a case is error of law which may be reviewed in this court. *(McHenry*v. *Jewett,*90 N. Y. 58.) The orders in these cases are not within the exception. The General Term, on appeal from the judgments of the Special Term in these actions, decided that the $15,529.90 of stock issued to the stockholders of «the corporation defendant was illegally issued and was a distribution of capital stock in contravention of the statute, and reversed the judgments of the Special Term which affirmed the validity of the issue. From the orders of reversal, appeals are now pending in this court.* The respective counsel have presented elaborate briefs on these appeals from the injunction orders on the one side in support of the construction of the statute given by the General Term, and on the other to main*641tain the proposition that the statute relied upon is inapplicable, and that assuming it to apply, the remedy by injunction is inappropriate. Under the circumstances, whatever - conclusion may finally be reached on the merits, it cannot be said that the case is a plain one upon the face of the complaint against the right of the plaintiff to the relief sought, and it would be improper in this incidental proceeding to consider the merits and in effect determine the controversy.

*ʽʽ*The appeals should, therefore, be dismissed.”

*A. J. Vanderpoel, Wager Swayne*and *William M. Evarts*for appellant.

*A. P. Whitehead, R. W. Russell, John Sessions*and *Robert Sewell*for respondents.

*

 For report of decision on appeals from orders of reversal, see *ante,*p. 162.

Andrews, J.,

reads mem. for dismissal of appeals.

All concur.

Appeals dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.1.1.2

Eastern Division

Grant Birchmeier, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04069

Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly

Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, May 26, 2017:

 MINUTE entry [663] before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly is amended as

follows: Motion hearing held on 5/23/2017. Motion for Bond [656] is granted. Freedom

Home Care is directed to post, by 5/30/2017, a $5,000 bond, in the form of a cashier's

check, to ensure payment of costs on appeal. (pjg, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Zong Yun Zhou, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)          The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| Dated this 31st day of   January, 2006 | /s/ Zong Yun Zhou       |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                   |                         |
|                                   | Zong Yun Zhou           |
|                                   | Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Marvin F.  Romanow,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
      on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.




Date: April 29, 2009


                                        /s/ Marvin F. Romanow
                                        ------------------------
                                        Marvin F. Romanow
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(b)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to Registration
Statement No. 33-43654 of ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A on
Form N-4 of our reports on (i) ML Life Insurance Company of New York dated
February 28, 2000, and (ii) ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A
dated February 14, 2000, appearing in the Statement of Additional Information,
which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under
the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is a part of such Registration
Statement.

               /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York
April 24, 2000
#### 219.803 Selecting acquisitions for the 8(a) Program.

When selecting acquisitions for the 8(a) Program, follow the procedures at PGI 219.803.

[72 FR 20762, Apr. 26, 2007]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Programs
2009.407-3 Procedures. ( a ) *Investigation and referral.* ( 1 ) When a contracting officer becomes aware of possible irregularities or any information which may be sufficient cause for suspension, the contracting officer must first submit a complete statement of facts (including a copy of any criminal indictments, if applicable) and a recommendation for action to the Head of the Contracting Activity. If the contracting officer's statement of facts indicates misconduct on the part of the contractor in regard to an NRC contract, the Head of the Contracting Activity will refer the matter of misconduct to the Inspector General to determine if an investigation is required prior to referring the case to the suspension official.
( 2 ) To the extent the Head of the Contracting Activity believes that sufficient grounds for debarment exist, independent of any pending investigation by the Inspector General, the Head of the Contracting Activity shall immediately forward the case, without reference to any pending investigation, and a recommendation for action to the Senior Procurement Executive for review. In such circumstances, the Head of the Contracting Activity will take no additional action in regard to a specific matter of misconduct referred to the Inspector General prior to consulting with the Inspector General.
( b ) *Decision-making process.* If, after reviewing the recommendations and consulting with the Office of the General Counsel, and if appropriate, the Office of the Inspector General, the suspending official determines suspension is justified, the suspending official shall initiate the proposed suspension in accordance with FAR 9.407-3(b)(2). The contractor shall be given the opportunity to appear at an informal hearing, similar in nature to the hearing for debarments as discussed in FAR 9.406-3(b)(2). If the contractor fails to submit a timely written response within 30 days after receipt of the notice in accordance with FAR 9.407-3(c)(5), the suspending official may notify the contractor in accordance with FAR 9.407-3(d) that the contractor is suspended.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/Richard C. Baylor
------------------------------------------
Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer

August 5, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### 237.175 Training that uses live vertebrate animals.

Use the clause at 252.235-7002, Animal Welfare, as prescribed in 235.072(a), when contracting for training that will use live vertebrate animals.

[79 FR 73501, Dec. 11, 2014]