alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF

DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.


This certification is provided pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is filed with respect to the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for
the quarter ended October 4, 2003 of Dole Food Company,
Inc. (the Issuer). I, David H. Murdock,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| |      |                                                                                                                                                                      
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i)  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Issuer.       

Dated: November 18, 2003

| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ DAVID H. MURDOCK                
| |                                     
| | David H. Murdock                    
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

51
## Federal Pell Distribution Data by Institution

Annual Distribution of Federal Pell Grant Program funds by institution
 and award year from 1999-00.  Federal Pell Grant Program Data Books2017-2018
Federal Pell Grant Program 2017-2018  End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2017-2018 End of Year Research  Tables Zip File (4.11M)
2016-2017
Federal Pell Grant Program 2016-2017  End of Year Report

  Federal Pell Grant Program 2016-2017 End of Year Research  Tables Zip File (4.1M)
2015-2016
Federal Pell Grant Program 2015-2016  End of Year Report

  Federal Pell Grant Program 2015-2016 End of Year Research  Tables Zip File (3.0MB)
2014-2015
Federal Pell Grant Program 2014-2015 End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2014-2015 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (2.9MB)
2013-2014
Federal Pell Grant Program 2013-2014 End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2013-2014 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (2.88MB)
2012-2013
Federal Pell Grant Program 2012-2013 End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2012-2013 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (2.8MB)
2011-2012
Federal Pell Grant Program 2011-2012 End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2011-2012 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (2.6MB)
2010-2011
Federal Pell Grant Program 2010-2011 End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2010-2011 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (2.18MB)

Academic Competitiveness Grant and National SMART Grant Programs 2010-2011 End of Year Report Zip file (361K) | PDF (185K)
2009-2010
Federal Pell Grant Program 2009-2010 End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2009-2010 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (2.01MB)

Academic Competitiveness Grant and National SMART Grant Programs 2009-2010 End of Year Report Zip file (197K) | PDF (226K)
2008-2009
Federal Pell Grant Program 2008-2009 End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2008-2009 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (1.85MB)

Academic Competitiveness Grant and National SMART Grant Programs 2008-2009 End of Year Report Zip file (354K) | PDF (193K)
2007-2008
Federal Pell Grant Program 2007-2008 End of Year Report

Federal Pell Grant Program 2007-2008 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (1.95MB)

Academic Competitiveness Grant and National SMART Grant Programs 2007-2008 End of Year Report Zip file (178K) | PDF (1.37MB)

Academic Competitiveness Grant and National SMART Grant Programs 2007-2008 End of Year Research Tables  Zip File (575K)
Prior year Federal Pell Grant Program annual data books are also available:- 2000-01 to the most recent
- 1990-91 through 1999-00
- 1980-81 through 1989-90
- 1973-74 through 1979-80

Top

OPE Program Data | OPE Policy Page
  Last Modified: 07/06/2020
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
10.47


    


    100%
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


    


    This 100%
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) dated this
12th
day of October 2009, is entered into by and between Dot VN, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Maker”) and Thomas Johnson (the
“Holder”).

    


    Recitals

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              A.

            	
                    
                Maker
      made, executed and delivered to the order of Holder that certain 100%
      Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated April 20, 2009, in the
      principal sum of $2,884,658.16 with
      interest payable at the rate of 8% per annum, which Note is due and
      payable on October 16, 2009 (the “Due
  Date”).

              

            
	 	 	 
	 	B.	      
              Make
      and Holder on October 12, 2009 extended the Due Date of the Note to
      December 31, 2009 (“First Extended Due Date”).

            
	 	 	 
	 	C.	      
              Maker
      and Holder desire to modify the terms of the Note to extend the First
      Extended Due Date.

            


    

     

    NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and
for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

    


    Agreement

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              The
      First Extended Due Date of the Note is extended to December 31, 2009, at
      which time the entire amount of principal plus accrued interest shall be
      due and payable in full.

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              Except
      as provided herein, the terms and provisions of the Note shall remain
      unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect; the Note as modified
      and amended hereby is ratified and confirmed in all
    respects.

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              3.

            	
              The
      terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
      of the parties hereto, their heirs, representatives, successors and
      assigns

            


    

    


    IN
WITHNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is effective as of the date first above
written.

     

    
      
        	
                “MAKER”

                Dot VN, Inc.

              	 	 	
                “HOLDER”

                Thomas Johnson

              	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                /s/
      Lee Johnson

              	 	 	
                /s/
      Thomas Johnson

              	 
	
                By:         Lee
      Johnson

              	 	 	
                By:         Thomas
      Johnson

              	 
	
                      
                  Its:         President
#### Eric Liff et al., as Executors of Joseph Liff, Deceased, Appellants, v Herman Schildkrout, Respondent.

— Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 9, 1978, affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements (see *Hentze v Curry Chevrolet Sales & Servs.,*46 AD2d 800; *Osborn v Kelley,*61 AD2d 367, 370). Damiani, J. P., Titone, O’Connor and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1



Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, John W. A. McDonald, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. (the registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

(Intentionally omitted pursuant to the guidance contained in SEC Release No. 33  8238)



(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 8, 2004



by /s/ John W. A. McDonald



John W. A. McDonald

President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03717

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Daniel Klimson, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 29, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Plaintiff's motions to

stay [63][65] are granted. Status hearing reset for 8/28/2014 at 09:00 AM. The 5/28/14

status date is vacated. No appearance required on 5/7/14. Mailed notice(srn, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
#### 225.7901-2 General.

Certain types of items are subject to export controls in accordance with the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751, *et seq.*), the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR parts 120-130), the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 *et seq.*), and the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774). See PGI 225.7901-2 for additional information.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

AF Holdings, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03516

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Comcast Cable Communications, LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, May 29, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion hearing held. Plaintiffs

amended motion for order to show cause why Comcast Cable Services should not be

found in contempt of court for failure to comply with subpoenas duces tecum [8] is

entered and continued. Comcast to file response brief by 6/1/2012; reply due by 6/8/2012.

Status hearing scheduled for 6/14/2012 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice.(jlj)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-03516 Document #: 10 Filed: 05/29/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:32
2001.104-1 Publication and code arrangement. ( a ) The NRCAR and its subsequent changes are: ( 1 ) Published in the daily issue of the Federal Register; and
( 2 ) Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
( b ) The NRCAR is issued as 48 CFR chapter 20.
232.7101 Policy and procedures. ( a ) The contracting officer shall require the contractor to— ( 1 ) Promptly notify the contracting officer when a levy may result in an inability to perform the contract; and
( 2 ) Advise the contracting officer whether the inability to perform may adversely affect national security.
( b ) The contracting officer shall promptly notify the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy (DPCAP), when the contractor's inability to perform will adversely affect national security or will result in significant additional costs to the Government. Follow the procedures at PGI 232.7101(b) for reviewing the contractor's rationale and submitting the required notification.
( c ) The Principal Director, DPCAP, will promptly evaluate the contractor's rationale and will notify the IRS, the contracting officer, and the payment office, as appropriate, in accordance with the procedures at PGI 232.7101(c).
( d ) The contracting officer shall then notify the contractor in accordance with paragraph (c) of the clause at 252.232-7010 and in accordance with the procedures at PGI 232.7101(d).
[71 FR 69492, Dec. 1, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 73237, Oct. 25, 2023; 89 FR 60832, July 29, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income and statement of cash flows contained in
Form 10-Q of Canal Electric Company for the nine months ended September 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016906
<NAME> CANAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                          <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>        191,726
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>        2,862
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>            24,577
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>          22,611
<OTHER-ASSETS>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   241,776
<COMMON>                          38,080
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>          8,321
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>               54,998
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>    101,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                   0
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                39,360
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>              0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>              0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>       10,128
<LEASES-CURRENT>                     565
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>    90,324
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>    241,776
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>         34,289
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>               6,353
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        16,924
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        23,277
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>           11,012
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                 5,909
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>    16,921
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             710
<NET-INCOME>                      16,211
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>     16,211
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>         203,178
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>              0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>          (140,909)
<EPS-BASIC>                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Annual Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K Amendment No. 2 for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Xiao Ping Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)   or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   Registrant. |

| Dated this 24th day of July, 2006. | By:    | /s/Xiao Ping Zhang      |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                               |   |                         |
|                               |   | Xiao Ping Zhang         |
|                               |   | Chief Executive Officer |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JOSEPH J. SMITH,

 PLAINTIFF,

V.

CAPTAIN MARK ALTMAN, et. al., 

DEFENDANTS.

 

 

Case No: 12-CV-04546

 Judge: Ellis

 

 Magistrate Judge: Kim

JOINT MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AND SATISFACTION

NOW COME the parties by their respective counsel, Blake Horwitz, on behalf of 

Plaintiff, and Thomas J. Platt, Deputy Corporation Counsel, on behalf of Defendants, and 

hereby request that the court enter judgment in this cause, stating as follows:

1. The parties agree to a judgment for compensatory damages and for additional 

attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C.§1988 being entered in this cause against City of 

Chicago and Mark Altman and in favor of Joseph Smith as follows:

Wages $ 162,490.00

Pain, Suffering $ 600,000.00

Loss of Normal life $ 300,000.00

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs $ 60,000.00

Total Judgment $1,122,449.00

2. The City of Chicago agrees to indemnify and satisfy the judgment stated above 

for compensatory damages and attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988 on behalf 

defendants City of Chicago and Mark Altman. 
2

3. The parties further stipulate and agree that this is the final judgment in this case as 

to compensatory damages and all remaining attorney’s fees and costs under 42 

U.S.C.§1988.

4. The judgment for punitive damages against Mark Altman in the amount of 

$5,000.00 was previously satisfied and paid in full by defendant Mark Altman.

5. The previous judgment for attorney’s fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. §1988.

against Defendants City of Chicago and Mark Altman in the total amount of 

$479,334.03 has been satisfied and paid in full by defendant City of Chicago.

WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant this 

Joint Motion for Judgment.

Respectfully Submitted,

s/ Blake W. Horwitz_

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/Jonathan Clark Green

Attorney for Defendant 

City of Chicago

/s/ Kristin Pinkston

Attorney for Defendant

Mark Altman

s/ Thomas Platt_____

Deputy Corporation Counsel 

The Blake Horwitz Law Firm, LTD.

111 W. Washington, Suite 1611

Chicago, IL 60602

Phone: (312) 676-2100

Fax: (312) 445-8741 July 12, 2016
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JOSEPH J. SMITH,

 PLAINTIFF,

V.

CAPTAIN MARK ALTMAN, et. al., 

DEFENDANTS.

 

 

Case No: 12-CV-04546

 Judge: Ellis

 

 Magistrate Judge: Kim

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, an attorney, state that the foregoing Joint Motion for Judgment was 

served via the court’s electronic filing system on July 12, 2016 to all parties of record.

s/ Blake W. Horwitz____

Blake W. Horwitz, Esq. 

The Blake Horwitz Law Firm, LTD.

111 W. Washington, Suite 1611

Chicago, IL 60602

Phone: (312) 676-2100

Fax: (312) 445-8741
#### 1631.205-74 FEHBP losses on other contracts.

FAR 31.205-23 shall not be construed to prohibit the application of the normal “loss carry forward” principle that is fundamental to continuing insurance contracts that are based on experience rating.
## Where do I start?

Grantmaking at ED provides an overview of the grants process from start to finish.

You may also want to see our Grant Information page.

## How do I find out what grants have been awarded?

Visit USASpending.gov for federal spending information, including the Department’s spending on grants.

Spending Data Maps, Timelines and Advanced Search on USASpending.gov:

- Prime Award Spending Data: Grants from Department of Education
- Sub-award Spending Data: Grants from Department of Education

The Institute of Education Sciences provides a searchable database of the research grants it has awarded.

|Last Modified: 06/23/2014
|-------------------------
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Viola E. Faust, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, et al., Respondents.

Memorandum by the Court.— Claimant, a laboratory technician, appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Whether claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause vis-a-vis the contention that a quit was induced by the artifice of the employer presented a factual issue exclusively within the competence of the board to determine. There is substantial evidence to support its decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.