IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on Briefs December 18, 2001

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GREGORY SCOTT ALLISON

 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County

No. C-10277 D. Kelly Thomas, Jr., Judge

No. E2001-00248-CCA-R3-CD 

March 25, 2002

The defendant, Gregory Scott Allison, appeals from the Blount County Circuit Court’s revoking his

probation that was ordered for his sentences for burglary and theft. The defendant contends that

although the trial court may have been justified in finding that he violated the terms of his probation,

it erred in sentencing him to confinement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Tenn. R. App. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court Affirmed

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which THOMAS T. WOODALL and

ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, JJ., joined.

Julie A. Rice, Knoxville, Tennessee (on appeal); Raymond M. Garner, District Public Defender; and

Shawn G. Graham, Assistant District Public Defender, Maryville, Tennessee (at trial), for the

appellant, Gregory Scott Allison.

Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Kathy D. Aslinger, Assistant Attorney General;

Michael L. Flynn, District Attorney General; and Kirk E. Andrews, Assistant District Attorney

General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

OPINION

Upon his guilty pleas to burglary, a Class D felony, and misdemeanor theft, the defendant

was sentenced to concurrent sentences of three years and eleven months and twenty-nine days. Upon

the defendant serving thirty days in jail, the remainder of his sentences were to be served on

supervised probation. The record reflects that the defendant successfully completed his thirty-day

jail sentence on May 17, 1998. 

In October 1998, the defendant’s probation supervisor filed a probation violation warrant,

alleging that the defendant had violated several terms of his probation, stating that he had been cited

with driving on a suspended license, had been charged with aggravated burglary, had failed to obtain

employment, had failed to report to his probation officer, and had failed to pay court costs. In July
-2-

1999, the trial court ordered that the defendant serve six months confinement for violating probation.

In March 2000, the trial court placed the defendant into the community corrections program, but in

April 2000, the trial court ordered that the defendant serve seven consecutive weekends in the Blount

County Jail for his failure to attend treatment sessions at the Kress Mental Health Center as required

by his community corrections contract. The defendant served five weekends in jail, and on May 23,

2000, the trial court agreed to waive the remaining weekends if the defendant would successfully

complete fifteen months in the Teen Challenge Program. The defendant left the program after only

one month, and on October 31, 2000, the defendant’s community corrections supervisor filed a

violation of community corrections affidavit, alleging that the defendant had tested positive for

marijuana. 

At the revocation hearing, Pat Ballard, the defendant’s community corrections supervisor,

testified that the defendant had physical, mental, and chemical dependency problems. She said that

he failed to pay court costs, failed to perform community service work, failed to attend treatment

sessions at the Kress Mental Health Center, and failed to attend her group therapy sessions. She said

that the defendant did not attend treatment and therapy sessions because he had an operation on one

of his club feet and because he was sick with pneumonia and bronchitis. She said that although the

defendant asked to go into the Teen Challenge Program, his club feet physically prevented him from

completing the program. She said that the defendant could not benefit from community corrections

because he did not attend treatment and therapy sessions. 

Ms. Ballard testified that the defendant could always get a doctor’s excuse for missing his

appointments. She said that although the defendant needed to attend therapy meetings twice a week,

his mother could only bring him once a week. She said that although the defendant had been

providing her with doctor’s excuses for his missed appointments, he stopped giving her medical

excuses in December 2000. She said that after the defendant’s brother died in the fall of 2000, he

tested positive for marijuana. She said that the defendant told her that he used marijuana to help him

cope with his brother’s death. She said that the defendant was mentally depressed and suicidal and

that she did not know how to supervise him. She said that the defendant was sick all of the time and

that nothing in the community corrections program could help him. 

On cross-examination, Ms. Ballard testified that before entering theTeenChallenge Program,

the defendant would attend meetings at the Kress Center when he did not have a medical excuse.

She said that the defendant recently had been hospitalized at Lakeshore Mental Health. She said that

the defendant needed the benefit of group therapy, which he was not getting. 

The defendant testified that at the time of the hearing, he was twenty-six years old, single,

and unemployed. He said that after entering the community corrections program in 1999, his

physical and mental conditions got worse. He said that his brother and grandmother had died

recently and that he did not want to deal with life. He said that he missed his brother.

The defendant acknowledged that he missed some meetings at the Kress Center and that he

was ordered to serve seven weekends in jail for missing those meetings. He said that he served five
-3-

weekends in jail before entering into the Teen Challenge Program. He said that it was his idea to

go into the Teen Challenge Program and that he had thought the program would help him. He said

that he went to Bluefield, Virginia to participate in the program but that he could not complete it

because he could not work in the mountains with his club feet. He said that he asked to be

transported into another program where the land is flat but that the Teen Challenge Program workers

in Virginia did not want him to leave their program. 

The defendant testified that when he returned to Blount County, he paid his $2,200 in fines

and that Pat Ballard told him that he had to start attending her group therapy classes. He said that

he missed some of the classes because he had an operation on one of his feet and could not walk.

He said that he also missed Ms. Ballard’s classes because of his brother’s death and because he got

sick. He said that he took medication for panic attacks and bipolar disorder, that he was scared to

ride in a car or be in groups, and that he did not go to the grocery store or go out with friends. The

defendant acknowledged failing a drug test in October 2000 and said that he smoked marijuana eight

days before the revocation hearing. He acknowledged that if his health and transportation situations

had been better, he would have been in a better position to keep his appointments at the Kress Center

and with Ms. Ballard.

On cross-examination, the defendant said that he got the marijuana from a high school friend,

and he acknowledged having a conviction for aggravated burglary. He said that he did not graduate

from high school but that he obtained his GED. He said that despite his medical problems, he was

turned down for federal Social Security benefits. He said that his mother had transportation but that

it was not always reliable. He said that he had no excuse for smoking marijuana eight days before

the hearing and that although he had been very sick with bronchitis, he was never hospitalized. 

Carol Noce, the defendant’s mother, testified that the defendant had lived with her all of his

life and that he was born with club feet. She said that the defendant had been a patient at Overlook

Mental Health since he was six years old and that he suffered from bipolar disorder and panic

syndrome. She said that about three weeks before the revocation hearing, the defendant was

hospitalized for seven days at Lakeshore Mental Health. She said that the defendant started missing

his meetings with Ms. Ballard in September 2000, when his brother died. She said that he missed

more meetings in October, November, and December because he had a foot operation and because

he was sick with bronchitis and pneumonia. 

On cross-examination, Ms. Noce said that she did not work outside the home and that she

was willing to take the defendant to therapy meetings more than once a week. Said that the

defendant had never held a job for more than three months. She said that the defendant liked to work

outside but that he had not worked in three years. She said that he used to work for men who

installed swimming pools and cut down trees.

The trial court held that the defendant violated the terms of his community corrections by

failing a drug screen and failing to complete the Teen Challenge Program. It noted that the

defendant had a “long list” of criminal convictions and that he had used marijuana eight days before
-4-

the revocation hearing. The trial court agreed that the defendant had physical, emotional, and

chemical dependency problems and that he needed more supervision and treatment than the

community corrections program could provide. It also stated that the defendant had shown that he

did not want to participate in the community corrections program. Finding that the defendant might

be able to benefit from the Department of Correction’s Special Needs Unit, the trial court revoked

the defendant’s probation and ordered that he serve the remainder of his sentence in incarceration.

Although the defendant admits that he violated the terms of his community corrections

program, he contends that the trial court’s disposition of the case was improper. He argues that the

trial court should have ordered that he be placed into a therapeutic halfway house or serve a period

of split confinement followed by placement into an inpatient treatment program in a secured facility.

The state contends that because the community corrections program could not meet the defendant’s

needs, the trial court did not err in revoking his probation. We agree with the state.

The decision to revoke probation is within the discretion of the trial court. State v. Grear,

568 S.W.2d 285, 286 (Tenn. 1978). Upon revoking probation, the trial court has the discretion to

order the original sentence to be served. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-310, -311(d). An abuse of

discretion may be found only if the record contains no substantial evidence to support the conclusion

of the trial court. See State v. Harkins, 811 S.W.2d 79, 82 (Tenn. 1991).

The defendant admitted testing positive for marijuana in October 2000 and smoking

marijuana again eight days before the revocation hearing. The record reflects a consistent failure to

comply with reasonable requirements. The defendant has not demonstrated that the trial court

abused its discretion by ordering him to serve the remainder of his sentence in incarceration. To

the contrary, his admitted drug abuse and refusal to seek treatment for it support the trial court’s

decision.

Based upon the foregoing and the record as a whole, we affirm the judgment of the trial

court.

___________________________________ 

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE