III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 58 

Recognizing the honorable service of military working dogs and soldier handlers in the tactical explosive detection dog program of the Army and 

encouraging the Army and other government agencies, including law 

enforcement agencies, with former tactical explosive detection dogs to 

prioritize adoption of the dogs to former tactical explosive detection 

dog handlers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2018 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. MANCHIN) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the honorable service of military working dogs 

and soldier handlers in the tactical explosive detection 

dog program of the Army and encouraging the Army 

and other government agencies, including law enforcement agencies, with former tactical explosive detection 

dogs to prioritize adoption of the dogs to former tactical 

explosive detection dog handlers. 

Whereas the 341st Training Squadron, 37th Training Wing 

at Lackland Air Force Base provides highly trained military working dogs to the Department of Defense and 

other government agencies; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 58 IS 

Whereas in 2010, the operational needs of the Army for military working dogs increased without an increase in resources to train a sufficient number of dogs for the detection of improvised explosive devices at the 341st Training 

Squadron; 

Whereas the Army initiated the tactical explosive detection 

dog program in August 2010 as a nontraditional military 

working dog program to train and field improvised explosive device detection dogs for use in Afghanistan as part 

of Operation Enduring Freedom; 

Whereas the tactical explosive detection dog program was created to reduce casualties from improvised explosive devices in response to an increase in the use of asymmetric 

weapons by the enemy; 

Whereas the tactical explosive detection dogs were a unique 

subset of military working dogs because the Army selected and trained soldiers from deploying units to serve 

as temporary handlers for only the duration of deployment to Operation Enduring Freedom; 

Whereas the tactical explosive detection dogs and their soldier 

handlers, like other military working dog and handler 

teams, formed strong bonds while training for combat 

and performing extremely dangerous improvised explosive 

device detection missions in service to the United States; 

Whereas the tactical explosive detection dog program was a 

nontraditional military working dog program that terminated in February 2014; 

Whereas at the termination of the tactical explosive detection 

dog program in February 2014, neither United States 

law nor Department of Defense policy established an 

adoption order priority, and Department of Defense polVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:47 Dec 06, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SC58.IS SC58

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SCON 58 IS 

icy only provided that military working dogs be adopted 

by former handlers, law enforcement agencies, and other 

persons capable of humanely caring for the animals; 

Whereas an August 2016 report to Congress by the Air 

Force entitled ‘‘Tactical Explosive Detector Dog (TEDD) 

Adoption Report’’ concluded that the Army had a limited 

transition window for the disposition of tactical explosive 

detection dogs and the lack of a formal comprehensive 

plan contributed to the disorganized disposition process 

for the tactical explosive detection dogs; 

Whereas the August 2016 report stated that, in 2014, the 

Army disposed of 229 tactical explosive detection dogs; 

Whereas 40 tactical explosive detection dogs were adopted by 

handlers, 47 dogs were adopted by private individuals, 70 

dogs were transferred to Army units, 17 dogs were transferred to other government agencies, 46 dogs were transferred to law enforcement agencies, and 9 dogs were deceased; 

Whereas the disposition of tactical explosive detection dogs 

was poorly executed, proper procedures outlined in Department of Defense policy were ignored, and, as a result, the former soldier handlers were not provided the 

opportunity to adopt their tactical explosive detection 

dogs; 

Whereas the Army should have deliberately planned for the 

disposition of the tactical explosive detection dogs and 

provided appropriate time to review and consider adoption applications to mitigate handler and civilian adoption 

issues; 

Whereas section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
4 

•SCON 58 IS 

Stat. 793) amended section 2583(c) of title 10, United 

States Code, to modify the list of persons authorized to 

adopt a military animal and prioritize the list with preference, respectively, to former handlers, other persons capable of humanely caring for the animal, and law enforcement agencies; 

Whereas since 2000, Congress has passed legislation that 

protects military working dogs, promotes their welfare, 

and recognizes the needs of their veteran handlers; 

Whereas Congress continues to provide oversight of military 

working dogs to prevent a reoccurrence of the disposition 

issues that affected tactical explosive detection dogs; 

Whereas former soldier handlers should be reunited with 

their tactical explosive detection dogs; 

Whereas congressional recognition of the military service of 

tactical explosive detection dogs and their former soldier 

handlers is a small measure of gratitude this legislative 

body can convey; and 

Whereas over 4 years have passed since the termination of 

the tactical explosive detection dog program: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the service of military working 

4 dogs and soldier handlers from the tactical explosive 

5 detection dog program; 

6 (2) acknowledges that not all tactical explosive 

7 detection dogs were adopted by their former soldier 

8 handlers; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
5 

•SCON 58 IS 

1 (3) encourages the Army and other government 

2 agencies, including law enforcement agencies, with 

3 former tactical explosive detection dogs to prioritize 

4 adoption to former tactical explosive detection dog 

5 handlers; and 

6 (4) honors the sacrifices made by tactical explo7 sive detection dogs and their soldier handlers in 

8 combat. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS