Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices 7259 

2 In the Initiation Notice this company was listed 

as Shandong Province Sanli Tire Manufacture Co., 

Ltd. Commerce later confirmed with counsel the 

correct spelling of the company’s name. See 

Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires 

from the People’s Republic of China: Ex-parte 

Phone Call/Email with Shandong Sanli Tire 

Manufactured Co., Ltd.’s Counsel,’’ dated October 

20, 2020. 

3See GTT’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light 

Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated October 20, 2020; see also Grunfeld, 

Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP’s 

Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for the 

Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order 

on Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires 

(‘‘PVLT’’) from the People’s Republic of China (A– 

570–016),’’ dated October 21, 2020; DeKieffer & 

Horgan, PLLC’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and 

Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China: Partial Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated December 9, 2020; 

Boto’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck 

Tires from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated December 14, 2020; Guofeng’s Letter, 

‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from 

People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated December 14, 

2020; Firemax’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Passenger Vehicle 

and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic 

of China—Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated December 21, 2020; 

and PCT’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Passenger Vehicle and 

Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China—Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated December 22, 2020. 

4See ITG Voma’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and 

Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China: Request for Review—2019–2020 Review 

Period,’’ dated August 31, 2020. 

5See ITG Voma’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and 

Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated December 14, 2020. 

(Giti Fujian); Giti Tire (Hualin) 

Company Ltd. (Giti Hualin); Giti Tire 

Global Trading Pte. Ltd. (GTT); Haohua 

Orient International Trade Ltd. (Haohua 

Orient); Prinx Chengshan (Shandong) 

Tire Company Ltd. (PCT); Qingdao 

Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd. (Lakesea); 

Qingdao Sentury Tire Co. Ltd. (Sentury); 

Riversun Industry Limited (Riversun); 

Safe & Well (HK) International Trading 

Limited (Safe & Well); Sailun Group 

(HongKong) Co., Limited (Sailun HK), 

formerly known as Sailun Jinyu Group 

(Hong Kong) Co., Limited (Sailun Jinyu 

HK); Sailun Group Co., Ltd. (Sailun 

Group), formerly known as Sailun Jinyu 

Group Co., Ltd. (Sailun Jinyu); Sailun 

Tire Americas Inc., formerly known as 

SJI North America Inc. (Sailun 

Americas); Sailun Tire International 

Corp. (Sailun International); Shandong 

Guofeng Rubber Plastics Co., Ltd. 

(Guofeng); Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., 

Ltd. (Linglong); Shandong New 

Continent Tire Co., Ltd. (New 

Continent); Shandong Province Sanli 

Tire Manufactured Co., Ltd. (Sanli); 2

Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd. 

(Boto); Shouguang Firemax Tyre Co., 

Ltd. (Firemax); and Windforce Tyre Co., 

Limited (Windforce).3

Partial Rescission 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review. Giti 

Radial Anhui; Giti Fujian; Giti Hualin; 

GTT; Haohua Orient; PCT; Lakesea; 

Sentury; Riversun; Safe & Well; Sailun 

HK; Sailun Group; Sailun Americas; 

Sailun International; Linglong; New 

Continent; Sanli; Boto; Firemax; and 

Windforce timely withdrew their 

requests for an administrative review. 

No other party requested a review of 

these 20 companies. On August 31, 

2020, ITG Voma Corporation (ITG 

Voma), a U.S. importer of passenger 

tires, requested a review of Guofeng.4

On December 14, 2020, ITG Voma 

withdrew their request for an 

administrative review on Guofeng.5

Accordingly, we are rescinding this 

review, in part, with respect to these 21 

companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). 

The instant review will continue with 

respect to the following companies: 

Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Tech Corp., Ltd.; 

Qingdao Landwinner Tyre Co., Ltd.; 

Qingdao Nexen Tire Corporation; 

Shandong Qilun Rubber Co., Ltd., 

Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co., Ltd.; 

Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd.; 

and Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd. 

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. For the companies for which 

this review is rescinded, antidumping 

duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 

the cash deposit of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the publication of this notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751 and 

777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: January 21, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–01798 Filed 1–26–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–502] 

Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes 

and Tubes From Thailand: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments, In 

Part; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that circular welded 

carbon steel pipes and tubes (pipes and 

tubes) from Thailand are being, or are 

likely to be sold, at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

March 1, 2018 through February 28, 

2019. We further determine that K Line 

Logistics had no shipments during the 

POR. 

DATES: Applicable January 27, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni 

Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
7260 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices 

1See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and 

Tubes from Thailand: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 

2019, 85 FR 18552 (April 2, 2020) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final No Shipment Determination, In Part; 2018– 

2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Scope of the Order.’’ 

4 Id. 

5See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 18552. 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1396. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 2, 2020, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on pipes and 

tubes from Thailand.1 The review 

covers 30 producers and/or exporters of 

the subject merchandise, including Saha 

Thai Steel Pipe Public Co., Ltd., also 

known as Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) 

Co., Ltd. (Saha Thai), which Commerce 

selected for individual examination. 

Further, Commerce found that K Line 

Logistics had no shipments during the 

POR. For a discussion of events since 

the Preliminary Results were published, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this review 

are certain circular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Thailand. For a 

full description of the scope, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this 

administrative review are addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

A list of issues raised, and to which we 

responded, in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, is attached to this notice 

as an appendix. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed and electronic versions of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Final Determination of No Shipments, 

In Part 

Commerce preliminarily found that K 

Line Logistics (K Line) had no 

shipments during the POR.5 We 

received no further comments or 

information that refute this finding 

since the Preliminary Results. Thus, 

Commerce continues to find that K Line 

had no shipments during the POR. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties, we have made changes to the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

applied to Saha Thai and the remaining 

non-selected respondents. For further 

discussion, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

March 1, 2018 through February 28, 

2019: 

Producer or exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd ............................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Apex International Logistics ......................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 

Aquatec Maxcon Asia .................................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Asian Unity Part Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Bis Pipe Fitting Industry Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Blue Pipe Steel Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 37.55 

Blue Pipe Steel Center Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Chuhatsu (Thailand) Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 

CSE Technologies Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 

Expeditors International (Bangkok) ............................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Expeditors Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

FS International (Thailand) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 37.55 

Kerry-Apex (Thailand) Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 

Oil Steel Tube (Thailand) Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Otto Ender Steel Structure Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 37.55 

Pacific Pipe and Pump ................................................................................................................................................................ 37.55 

Pacific Pipe Public Company Limited (also known as Pacific Pipe Company) .......................................................................... 37.55 

Panalpina World Transport Ltd .................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 

Polypipe Engineering Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 

Schlumberger Overseas S.A ....................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 

Siam Fittings Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Siam Steel Pipe Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Sino Connections Logistics (Thailand) Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... 37.55 

Thai Malleable Iron and Steel ..................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 

Thai Oil Group ............................................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Thai Oil Pipe Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................. 37.55 

Thai Premium Pipe Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................ 37.55 

Vatana Phaisal Engineering Company ........................................................................................................................................ 37.55 

Visavakit Patana Corp., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................... 37.55 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices 7261 

6See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

7See Antidumping Duty Order; Circular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR 

8341 (March 11, 1986). 

1See Certain Uncoated Paper Products from 

Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, 

and Indonesia: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention 

Inquiry of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 84 FR 55915 (October 18, 2019) (Initiation 

Notice). 

2See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, 

Brazil, Indonesia, the People’s Republic of China, 

and Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and 

Indonesia and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

11174 (March 3, 2016) (Order). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce 

determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise, in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. For each of the companies 

identified in the ‘‘Final Results of the 

Administrative Review’’ above, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties at the ad valorem 

rate equal to each company’s weightedaverage dumping margin. 

Consistent with its recent notice,6

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

under review will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above 

in the ‘‘Final Results of the 

Administrative Review’’ above, 

including companies for which 

Commerce may determine to have had 

no shipments during the POR, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review or another 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

but the producer is, then the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

for the most recently completed segment 

of this proceeding for the producer of 

the merchandise; and (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the producer is a firm 

covered in this or any previously 

completed segment of this proceeding, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

all-others rate of 15.67 percent 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.7 These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 19, 2021 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes to the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of Comments 

Comment 1: Dual-Stenciled Standard Pipe 

and Line Pipe 

Comment 2: Acceptance of Wheatland’s 

New Factual Information (NFI) 

Submission 

Comment 3: Application of Total Adverse 

Facts Available (AFA) to Saha Thai 

Comment 4: Extension of the Deadlines To 

Reopen the Record of Review 

Comment 5: Adjustment of Hot-Rolled Coil 

(HRC) Costs to Account for a Particular 

Market Situation (PMS) 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01793 Filed 1–26–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–842] 

Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: 

Affirmative Preliminary Determination 

of Circumvention of the Antidumping 

Duty Order for Uncoated Paper Rolls 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that imports of certain uncoated paper 

rolls from Brazil are circumventing the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

uncoated paper from Brazil. As a result, 

all imports of certain uncoated paper 

rolls from Brazil from Ahlstrom Brasil 

Ltd. (Ahlstrom) will be subject to 

suspension of liquidation on or after 

October 18, 2019. All remaining imports 

of certain uncoated paper rolls from 

Brazil will be subject to suspension of 

liquidation on or after the date of 

publication of this preliminary 

determination. Commerce is also 

imposing a certification requirement. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on this preliminary determination. 

DATES: Applicable January 27, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jasun Moy, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8194. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 18, 2019, Commerce 

initiated an anti-circumvention inquiry 

to determine whether imports of certain 

uncoated paper rolls that are further 

processed into uncoated paper sheets in 

the United States 1 are circumventing 

the Order on certain uncoated paper 

from Brazil.2 Commerce issued 

questionnaires soliciting data on the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES