alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 246.702-70 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Acceptance* as used in this subpart and in the warranty clauses at FAR 52.246-17, Warranty of Supplies of a Noncomplex Nature; FAR 52.246-18, Warranty of Supplies of a Complex Nature; FAR 52.246-19, Warranty of Systems and Equipment Under Performance Specifications or Design Criteria; and FAR 52.246-20, Warranty of Services, includes the execution of an official document (e.g., DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report) by an authorized representative of the Government.

*Defect* means any condition or characteristic in any supply or service furnished by the contractor under the contract that is not in compliance with the requirements of the contract.

*Enterprise* means the entity (*e.g.,* a manufacturer or vendor) responsible for granting the warranty and/or assigning unique item identifiers to serialized warranty items.

*Enterprise identifier* means a code that is uniquely assigned to an enterprise by an issuing agency.

*Issuing agency* means an organization responsible for assigning a globally unique identifier to an enterprise, as indicated in the Register of Issuing Agency Codes for International Standards Organization/International Electrotechnical Commission 15459, located at *http://www.aimglobal.org/?Reg_Authority15459.*

*Serialized item* means each item produced is assigned a serial number that is unique among all the collective tangible items produced by the enterprise, or each item of a particular part, lot, or batch number is assigned a unique serial number within that part, lot, or batch number assignment within the enterprise identifier. The enterprise is responsible for ensuring unique serialization within the enterprise identifier or within the part, lot, or batch numbers, and that serial numbers, once assigned, are never used again.

*Unique item identifier* means a set of data elements marked on an item that is globally unique and unambiguous.

*Warranty tracking* means the ability to trace a warranted item from delivery through completion of the effectivity of the warranty.

[76 FR 33168, June 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 17043, Mar. 25, 2016. Redesignated at 86 FR 59871, Oct. 29, 2021]
Case: 1:12-cr-00367 Document #: 11 Filed: 07/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:17
219.502-1 Requirements for setting aside acquisitions. Do not set aside acquisitions— ( 1 ) For supplies that were developed and financed, in whole or in part, by Canadian sources under the U.S.-Canadian Defense Development Sharing Program; or
( 2 ) Excluded from procurement center representative review (see 219.402(c)(iii)).
[84 FR 72563, Dec. 31, 2019]
JR-JJ 010135

EXHIBIT H

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 77-9 Filed: 03/12/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1099
239.7302 Applicability. Notwithstanding FAR 39.001, this subpart shall be applied to acquisition of information technology for covered systems (see 10 U.S.C. 3252), for procurements involving— ( a ) A source selection for a covered system or a covered item of supply involving either a performance specification (see 10 U.S.C. 3206(a)(3)(B)), or an evaluation factor (see 10 U.S.C. 3206(b)(1)), relating to supply chain risk;
( b ) The consideration of proposals for and issuance of a task or delivery order for a covered system or a covered item of supply where the task or delivery order contract concerned includes a requirement relating to supply chain risk (see 10 U.S.C. 3406(d)(3) and FAR 16.505(b)(1)(iv)(D)); or
( c ) Any contract action involving a contract for a covered system or a covered item of supply where such contract includes a requirement relating to supply chain risk.
[78 FR 69271, Nov. 18, 2013. Redesignated and amended at 80 FR 67251, Oct. 30, 2015; 84 FR 4370, Feb. 15, 2019; 87 FR 76995, Dec. 16, 2022]
Exhibit 23(a)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-68762,  33-74638,  33-86720, 33-91918, 33-93466,
33-64289, 333-15165,  333-26155,  333-46818, 333-47359, 333-80813) and Forms S-8
(Nos.  333-38373  and  333-96435)  of Pharmos  Corporation  of our report  dated
February 12, 2001  relating to the financial  statements,  which appears in this
Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 28, 2001
## FY 2021

Number of new awards: TBAAverage award:	$TBATotal new awards funded: $TBA
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

1 531 U.S. 356, 374 n.9 (2001). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

July 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50790

JAMES HEATH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Western District of Texas

(W-02-CV-146)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

On appeal Plaintiff Ja mes Heath complains that the district

court erred in dismissing h is claims under the ADA and FMLA for

want of jurisdiction because language in Board of Trustees of the

University of Alabama v. Garrett 1 suggests that, pursuant to Ex2 209 U.S. 123 (1908).

-2-

parte Young

, 2 the Eleventh Amendment does not prohibit him from

seeking prospective injunctive relief against Johnson, the

assertedly responsible st ate official. Heath did not contend in

response to Johnson’s motion to dismiss that he was seeking

injunctive relief so neither Garrett nor Ex parte Young was ever

considered by the district court. Because Heath did not present

this argument to the district court, we AFFIRM the dismissal and do

not address whether Garrett and Ex parte Young apply in this case.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent 

Litigation 

 Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 

Judge James F. Holderman 

Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier This Document Relates To: 

1:12-cv-3860 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

 On this day, Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Innovatio Management, LLC 

and Noel B. Whitley (collectively, “Innovatio”) and Home Depot USA, Inc. (including 

the originally-sued The Home Depot, Inc. and any Entity owned or controlled, directly or 

indirectly, by Home Depot USA, Inc. or The Home Depot, Inc.) announced to the Court 

that they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in the above-captioned 

actions. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for 

dismissal should be GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims by Innovatio 

against Defendants and by Defendants against Innovatio in the above-captioned actions, 

including Case Nos. 1:11-cv-09308 (consolidated) and 1:12-cv-03860, are dismissed, 

with prejudice to the re-filing of same. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses 

shall be borne by the party incurring the same. 

This is a final judgment. 

5/27/14 

_________________________________ 

James F. Holderman 

United States District Judge
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 2 4

- 00 153

- CV
IN RE Daniel ALDERETE, JR
. , Relato r Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 14, 2024
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On February 26, 2024 , relator filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. This court has
determined the relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition for a writ of
mandamus is DENIE D

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8.
PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 20 16

- CI

- 05227 , styled Analisa M. Alderete v. Daniel Alderete, Jr. , in the 37 th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas , the Honorable Nadine Melissa Nieto presiding

.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NWFSC Tech Memo 12: Exposure to oil from the Exxon Valdez Figure 16. Chromatograms showing the aromatic contaminants in (A) spilled Prudhoe Bay crude oil (PBCO) and (B) the C2-naphthalenes and C2-phenanthrenes in PBCO. IS in ( ) denotes internal standard. Figure 17. Structures of selected parent and alkyl aromatic compounds, including all of the possible C2-naphthalene isomer structures.
#### 1604.7001 Coordination of benefits clause.

OPM expects all FEHBP plans to coordinate benefits. Accordingly, the clause set forth at 1652.204-71 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

HSBC BANK USA, N.A., etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 4126

)

JESSICA SCLAFINI, etc., )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Counsel for Jessica Sclafini (“Sclafini”), the mortgagor in

this mortgage foreclosure action, has noticed up for presentment

on November 15 her motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (“AC”)

because of its asserted failure to establish diversity of

citizenship. To that end Sclafini’s counsel seeks to rely on the

AC’s failure to use the words “current mortgagee” (emphasis in

the motion itself) in speaking of the junior mortgage.

That nit-picking approach ignores the basic principle that

for purposes of addressing a motion such as the current one the

plaintiff is entitled to the drawing of reasonable inferences in

its favor. This Court denies the motion sua sponte and orders

Sclafini to answer the AC on or before November 19, 2012.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: November 6, 2012
227.7203-4 License rights. ( a ) *Grant of license.* The Government obtains rights in computer software or computer software documentation, including a copyright license, under an irrevocable license granted or obtained by the contractor which developed the software or documentation or the licensor of the software or documentation if the development contractor is not the licensor. The contractor or licensor retains all rights in the software or documentation not granted to the Government. The scope of a computer software license is generally determined by the source of funds used to develop the software. Contractors or licensors may, with some exceptions, restrict the Government's rights to use, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display, or disclose computer software developed exclusively or partially at private expense (see 227.7203-5 (b) and (c)). They may not, without the Government's agreement (see 227.7203-5(d)), restrict the Government's rights in computer software developed exclusively with Government funds or in computer software documentation required to be delivered under a contract.
( b ) *Source of funds determination.* The determination of the source of funds used to develop computer software should be made at the lowest practicable segregable portion of the software or documentation (e.g., a software sub-routine that performs a specific function). Contractors may assert restricted rights in a segregable portion of computer software which otherwise qualifies for restricted rights under the clause at 252.227-7014, Rights in Other Than Commercial Computer Software and Other Than Commercial Computer Software Documentation.
[60 FR 33482, June 28, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 6586, Jan. 31, 2023]
#### 252.216-7008 Economic price adjustment—wage rates or material prices controlled by a foreign government—representation.

As prescribed in 216.203-4-70(c)(2), use the following provision:

# Economic Price Adjustment—Wage Rates or Material Prices Controlled by a Foreign Government—Representation (MAR 2012)

(a) By submission of its offer, the offeror represents that the prices set forth in this offer—

(1) Are based on the wage rate(s) or material price(s) established and controlled by the government of ________________ (*Offeror insert name of host country*), and

(2) Do not include contingency allowances to pay for possible increases in wage rates or material prices.

(End of provision)

[77 FR 19131, Mar. 30, 2012]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-5404) pertaining to the 1983 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan of
ALPNET, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-06091) pertaining to the ALPNET, Inc. 1996 Executive Stock Option Plan, of
our Auditors' Report dated February 24, 1999 with respect to the balance sheet
of ALPNET Canada Inc. as at December 31, 1998 and the statements of earnings,
deficit and changes in financial position for the year ended December 31, 1998,
which we have been advised is included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
ALPNET, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.



\s\ RICHTER, USHER & VINEBERG
Chartered Accountants



Montreal, Quebec
March 11, 1999
DARYL LAMAR BROWN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1880

________ ________ ___________/

Opinion filed September 9, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Ross Goodman , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bo ndi, Attorney General, Kristen Bonjour, Assistant Attorney General,
Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO

, THOMAS

, and CLARK

, J J

. , CONCUR.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed September 11, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00571-CV

DAVID ARTHUR, Appellant

V.

ANGELA LAFRANCES EVANS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-00162-2014

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O’Neill, Lang-Miers, and Brown

Opinion by Justice O’Neill

Stating he no longer desires to prosecute the appeal, appellant has filed a motion for 

voluntary dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the 

appeal. See id.

 

140571F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVID ARTHUR, Appellant

No. 05-14-00571-CV V.

ANGELA LAFRANCES EVANS AND 

ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 6, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-00162-2014.

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Brown 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

We ORDER that appellees Angela LaFrances Evans and all other occupants recover 

their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant David Arthur.

Judgment entered this 11th day of September, 2014.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0001043 26-DEC-2013 08:19 AM
#### 227.7203 Other than commercial computer software and other than commercial computer software documentation.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. HAAS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 25, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Joseph Haas, indicted under the name of Joseph A. Hayes, alias Harry J. Clare.

No opinion. Judgment of conviction reversed on argument, on account of error in the charge, and new trial ordered.
#### 22.404 Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute wage determinations.

The Department of Labor is responsible for issuing wage determinations reflecting prevailing wages, including fringe benefits. The wage determinations apply only to those laborers and mechanics employed by a contractor upon the site of the work including drivers who transport to or from the site materials and equipment used in the course of contract operations. Determinations are issued for different types of construction, such as building, heavy, highway, and residential (referred to as rate schedules), and apply only to the types of construction designated in the determination.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James J. Moran, Appellant.

Order denying defendant’s application for a writ of error *coram nobis,*dated December 29, 1959, unanimously affirmed. Appeal from order denying defendant’s motion to disqualify Judge Mullen from presiding at defendant’s *coram nobis*hearing, dated December 8, 1959, dismissed. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.
#### 2452.237-79 Post award conference.

As prescribed in 2437.110(e)(5), insert the following clause in all contracts for services:

### Post Award Conference (MAR 2016)

The Contractor shall be required to attend a post-award conference on DATE______ to be held at ADDRESS______, unless other arrangements are made. All Contractors must have a valid ID for security clearance into the building.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* Post Award Conference (MAR 2016) If the conference will be conducted via telephone or video conferencing, substitute the following for the first and second sentences:

The conference will be conducted via [*telephone, video conferencing*]. The Contracting Officer or designee will provide the contractor with the date, time and contact information for the conference.

(End of Alternate I)

[81 FR 13754, Mar. 15, 2016]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 37 0 5

_____________________________
J USTIN T AVARSE B ARGE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. July 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
1846.102 Policy. ( f ) See NPR 8735.2, Section 2.1, concerning quality assurance for critical acquisition items. Generally, the quality assurance requirements set forth in the NPR for critical acquisition items are not allowed under part 12 procedures. See FAR 12.208.
[80 FR 12944, Mar. 12, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 142 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 142

  Commemorating the 10th anniversary of the tragic events at Virginia 
     Polytechnic Institute and State University on April 16, 2007.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2017

    Mr. Kaine (for himself and Mr. Warner) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating the 10th anniversary of the tragic events at Virginia 
     Polytechnic Institute and State University on April 16, 2007.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the 32 victims who lost their lives as a 
        result of the tragic events at Virginia Polytechnic Institute 
        and State University (referred to as ``Virginia Tech'') on 
        April 16, 2007, Ross A. Alameddine, Christopher James Bishop, 
        Brian R. Bluhm, Ryan Christopher Clark, Austin Michelle Cloyd, 
        Jocelyne Couture-Nowak, Kevin P. Granata, Matthew Gregory 
        Gwaltney, Caitlin Millar Hammaren, Jeremy Michael Herbstritt, 
        Rachael Elizabeth Hill, Emily Jane Hilscher, Jarrett Lee Lane, 
        Matthew Joseph La Porte, Henry J. Lee, Liviu Librescu, G.V. 
        Loganathan, Partahi Mamora Halomoan Lumbantoruan, Lauren Ashley 
        McCain, Daniel Patrick O'Neil, Juan Ramon Ortiz-Ortiz, Minal 
        Hiralal Panchal, Daniel Alejandro Perez Cueva, Erin Nicole 
        Peterson, Michael Steven Pohle, Jr., Julia Kathleen Pryde, Mary 
        Karen Read, Reema Joseph Samaha, Waleed Mohamed Shaalan, Leslie 
        Geraldine Sherman, Maxine Shelly Turner, and Nicole Regina 
        White;
            (2) recognizes the 17 individuals who survived the shooting 
        and supports the continued recovery of those survivors from 
        physical and psychological wounds;
            (3) offers condolences to the families and friends of the 
        victims;
            (4) expresses hope that the memory of each victim will live 
        on; and
            (5) recognizes--
                    (A) the resilience of the Virginia Tech community 
                in the decade following the tragedy of April 16, 2007; 
                and
                    (B) that the perseverance of the Virginia Tech 
                community serves as an example to communities that 
                experience similar tragedies.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          20,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,840)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,697
<PP&E>                                         180,043
<DEPRECIATION>                               (111,628)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 366,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,790
<BONDS>                                            640
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              287
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   366,620
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               456,327
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  401,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,666
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26


</TABLE>