alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending
February 29, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alex Trevino, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Alex Trevino, Jr.Alex Trevino, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerOctober 15, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting; change.

# SUMMARY:

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         notice that was originally published on January 22, 2021, (Volume 86, Number 13, Page 6740) the time for this meeting has changed from 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time to 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time. All other meeting details remain the unchanged.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Fred Smith. For more information please contact Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

Dated: January 26, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-02008 Filed 1-29-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC., 

an Ohio corporation, individually and as 

the representative of a class of similarlysituated persons, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ALLSCRIPTS-MISY’S HEALTHCARE 

SOLUTIONS, INC., ALLSCRIPTS, 

LLC, ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE 

SOLUTIONS, INC. and ALLSCRIPTS 

HEALTHCARE, LLC, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 12-cv-03233 

Hon. John F. Grady 

Magistrate Judge Hon. Jeffrey Cole 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff, PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, 

INC. and Defendants, ALLSCRIPTS-MISY’S HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC., 

ALLSCRIPTS, LLC, ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and ALLSCRIPTS 

HEALTHCARE, LLC, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of Defendants, ALLSCRIPTS-MISY’S 

HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and ALLSCRIPTS, LLC without prejudice. 

 

By: /s/ Brian J. Wanca By: /s/ David S. Almeida 

Brian J. Wanca David S. Almeida 

ANDERSON + WANCA SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER 

3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 760 & HAMPTON, LLP 

Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 70 W. Madison Street, 48th Floor 

Chicago, IL 60602 

 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendants 

Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 79 Filed: 12/17/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:584
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on December 17, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all 

attorneys of record. 

 

 s/ Brian J. Wanca 

 One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys 

Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 79 Filed: 12/17/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:585
Appeal No. 74-139.

#### Sandra Hazen *v.*Irwin Hazen.

*Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor,*for appellant. *Robert G. Crouchley,*for appellee.

Motion of appellant requesting that either her appeal be sustained in the light of the appellee’s failure to file his brief or that the controversy be decided solely on the basis of the contentions she has briefed is denied. The appeal assigned to the continuous argument list.

Doris, J. not participating.
2013-2014

Report to Congress on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act State-Reported Data for School Years 2013-2014 MS WORD (915KB)

2012-2013

Report to Congress on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act State-Reported Data for School Years 2012-2013 MS WORD (794KB)

2011-2012

Report to Congress on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act State-Reported Data for School Years 2011-2012 MS WORD (2.75M)

2010-2011

Report to Congress on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act State-Reported Data for School Years 2010-2011 MS WORD (2.77M)

2009-2010

Report to Congress on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act State-Reported Data for School Years 2009-2010 MS WORD (2.79M)

2008-2009

Report to Congress on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act State-Reported Data for School Years 2008-2009 MS WORD (3.0M)

2003-2004 to 2007-2008

Report to Congress on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act State-Reported Data for School Years 2003-04 to 2007-08 (2011) MS WORD (8.5M)

2002-2003

Under Section 1111(h)(5) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as amended by NCLB, the Secretary of Education is required to transmit to the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate a report that provides State-level data for each State receiving assistance under Title I of ESEA. In this first Secretary's NCLB report to Congress, the Department is reporting on State reported data for the 2002-2003 school year.

- Table of Contents, Introduction and Summary of Findings     MS Word  (862K) PDF  (272K)  
- Appendix A—State Assessment Data from the 2002-2003 School Year     MS Excel  (575K)  
- Appendix B—State Lists of Title I Schools Identified for Improvement during the 2003-2004 School Year     MS Excel  (1.5M)

The Department collected the information presented in this report from States through State Consolidated State Application submissions in June 2002, May 2003, and September 2003 and through Part I of the NCLB Consolidated State Performance Report for the 2002-2003 school year, which States submitted in December 2003. It is important to note that the 2002-2003 school year was the first year that States were required to collect and report data on the acquisition of English language proficiency by children with limited English proficiency, the number of students and Title I schools participating in public school choice and supplemental educational services, the qualifications of teachers and paraprofessionals, and the percentage of public elementary and secondary school classes taught by highly qualified teachers.
#### Altamese Lipsey, Respondent, *v.*940 St. Nicholas Ave. Corp., Defendant, and Knickerbocker Hospital, Appellant.

First Department,

March 28, 1961.

*415*Jonathan Hayt*of counsel *(Hayt & Hayt,*attorneys), for appellant.

*Milton Redman*of counsel *(Redman & Rogers,*attorneys), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff in this negligence action was treated at Knickerbocker Hospital. The hospital is not a party to the action. Plaintiff made a request of the hospital to examine their records of her treatment in the hospital, which request was refused. She then moved for permission to examine and secure a copy of these records. In granting the motion the learned court was undoubtedly aware of the many Special Term decisions to the contrary (e.g., see *Matter of Cenci [St. John Hosp.],*185 Misc. 479). However, the motion was granted upon the ground that it was a more convenient method of obtaining the information than that allowable to the plaintiff by means of examination of the hospital as a witness in the action or by subpoena at the time of the trial. Undoubtedly, to allow an examination in this form is less expensive and less time-consuming not only to the person seeking the information but to the hospital itself. Moreover, there is no valid reason why a person treated at a hospital should not have available to him the records of that treatment. Unfortunately, we feel that these factors cannot be given consideration. Inspection or examination is strictly limited to the instances of express statutory provision *(Matter of Corporation Counsel of City of N. Y.*v. *Smith,*1 N Y 2d 813, revg. 286 App. Div. 561). Belief in this respect must come from legislative enactment.

The order should be unanimously reversed and motion denied. No costs.

Bbeitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Steueb and Bastow, JJ., concur.

*416Order entered on December 1, 1960, granting plaintiff-respondent’s motion to examine and to obtain a photocopy of appellant’s records relating to the treatment of the plaintiff, unanimously reversed and the motion denied, without costs.
#### Crenshaw *vs.*The State of Georgia.

[ Warner, Chief Justice, being engaged in presiding over the senate organized as a court of impeachment, did not sit in this case.]

The indictment charged the stealing of ‘‘one blue hog, to-wit, a sow weighing about one hundred and forty pounds, and having 'the marks following, to-wit, a swallow fork in 'the right ear and a smooth crop in the left ear.” The description proved at the trial differed from the foregoing in two respects; first, the sow, though blue, had a narrow white list around her; and, secondly, the left ear bore the swallow fork, and the right ear the smooth crop.

*Meld,*that the narrow white list did not conflict with the general description as to color given in the indictment; but that the earmarks proved varied materially from those alleged, and for this reason the prisoner was improperly convicted. Though it was unnecessary to have described the animal by the ear-marks, yet the descriptive terms of the indictment having gone to this extent, the burden was assumed of proving the specific marks alleged. Ros. Cr. Ev., 192; 2 Russ. on Crimes, 788; 15 Me., 476 ; 50 *Ga.,*591.

Bleckley, Justice.
To: U.S. Department of Education; Negotiated Rulemaking Committee

From: TBD

Date: November 14, 2023

RE: Redlines to Maximum Repayment Term Text

BACKGROUND & OVERVIEW

This proposal attempts to address two issues with the draft regulatory text proposing a 25 year 

maximum repayment term, in order to better align this draft regulation with the consumer 

protections included in the SAVE Plan: 

First, these revisions allow for the secretary to waive the outstanding balance of a loan on a 

shorter timeline when the original principal balance is low enough to qualify for faster debt 

cancellation under SAVE. The change below mirror the regulation that will go into effect on July

1, 2024. 

Second, these revisions seek to eliminate the cliff created by the original draft regulation. As 

drafted by the Department, a borrower who has been in repayment for 24 years and 11 months 

would be ineligible for relief, while a borrower in debt for 25 years would be debt free. This 

proposed revisions create a time-bound, discrete class of eligible borrowers limited only to those 

borrowers who had debts in repayment before all of the protections included in SAVE became 

available on July 1, 2024.

TEXT REDLINE

(c) First entered repayment 25 years ago. 

(1) The Secretary may waive the outstanding balance of a loan if—

(i) the loan was in repayment, including periods when the loan was in default, deferment, or 

forbearance, for at least 300 months or 120 months in the case that the borrower's total original 

principal balance on all loans is less than or equal to $12,000, plus an additional 12 monthly 

payments or the equivalent over a period of at least 1 year for every $1,000 if the total original

principal balance is above $12,000; and (ii) the loan entered repayment by no later than July 1, 

2024. by no later than July 1, 2025. 

(2) For the purpose of this paragraph (c), a loan enters repayment on—

(i) For a Federal Stafford Loan, a Direct Subsidized Loan, or a Direct Unsubsidized Loan, the 

day after the initial grace period ends; 

(ii) For a Federal PLUS Loan or a Direct PLUS Loan, the day the loan is fully disbursed; or 

(iii) For a Federal Consolidation Loan or Direct Consolidation Loan, the earliest day as 

determined under paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section for any loan that was repaid by that 

consolidation loan.
For the latest news and updates for OSERS and OSEP, please check out the **OSERS Spotlight** section on the OSERS Homepage.

### OSEP Navigation

About OSEP | What's New in OSEP | People and OfficesPrograms and Projects | Grants and FundingLegislation and Policy | Publications and ProductsResearch and Statistics | National Studies | MonitoringSpecial Education Technical Assistance and Dissemination NetworkContact and Feedback
# Официален вестник C 394A/27 н

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 394A |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 5827 ноември 2015 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 394A

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 5827 ноември 2015 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Становища |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Евроюст |
| 2015/C 394A/01 | Обява за длъжността административен директор на Евроюст (степен AD 14) — Хага (Холандия) — 15/EJ/04 | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

V   Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Евроюст

2015/C 394A/01

Обява за длъжността административен директор на Евроюст (степен AD 14) — Хага (Холандия) — 15/EJ/04

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

V Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Евроюст

| 27.11.2015 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2015

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 394/1

---

ОБЯВА ЗА ДЛЪЖНОСТТА АДМИНИСТРАТИВЕН ДИРЕКТОР НА ЕВРОЮСТ (СТЕПЕН AD 14)

Хага (Холандия) — 15/EJ/04

(2015/C 394 A/01)

Евроюст отправя покана към заинтересованите лица да кандидатстват за длъжността административен директор на Евроюст. Евроюст е създадена през 2002 г. за засилване ефективността на компетентните власти на държавите членки в борбата с тежката трансгранична и организирана престъпност. Евроюст се състои от колегия от прокурори, съдии или полицейски служители, които отговарят за неговата организация и дейност. Административният директор е отговорен, под ръководството на президента на колегията, за ежедневното управление на Евроюст и неговите служители. Моля, посетете нашия уебсайт за по-подробната обява и процедура за кандидатстване:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

Крайният срок за кандидатстване е 31 януари 2016 г. в полунощ централно европейско време.

---
217.7003 Purchase request. Ensure that the requiring activity provides all of the following in support of the purchase request— ( a ) A certification that the property is eligible for exchange and complies with all conditions and limitations of DoD Manual 4140.01, Volume 9, DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Procedures: Materiel Programs.
( b ) A written determination of economic advantage indicating— ( 1 ) The anticipated economic advantage to the Government from use of the exchange authority;
( 2 ) That exchange allowances shall be applied toward, or in partial payment of, the items to be acquired; and
( 3 ) That, if required, the exchange property has been rendered safe or innocuous or has been demilitarized;
( c ) All applicable approvals for the exchange; and
( d ) A description of the property available for exchange (e.g., nomenclature, location, serial number, estimated travel value).
[56 FR 36345, July 31, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 39705, June 27, 2000; 77 FR 23632, Apr. 20, 2012; 82 FR 61480, Dec. 28, 2017]
Exhibit 31



Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



I, Randy L. Denecky, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. (the registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

[intentionally omitted]



(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 13, 2003



/s/ Randy L. Denecky

Randy L. Denecky

President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The Enchanted Village Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
R. Keating, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Kevin R. Keating
------------------------
Kevin R. Keating
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
May __, 2004
#### 249.105-2 Release of excess funds.

See PGI 249.105-2 for guidance on recommending the release of excess funds.

[71 FR 27645, May 12, 2006]
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended July 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 5, 2005

By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer