alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 15 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 15

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Mexico City policy should 
                      be permanently established.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 20, 2017

Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Daines, Mr. Moran, Mr. Sasse, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
   Cruz, and Mr. Paul) submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Mexico City policy should 
                      be permanently established.

Whereas section 104(f) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
        2151b(f)) (commonly referred to as the ``Helms amendment'') states that 
        no foreign assistance funds may be used to pay for the performance of 
        abortion as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any 
        person to practice abortions;
Whereas section 518 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related 
        Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-102; 119 Stat. 2202) 
        (commonly referred to as the ``Siljander Amendment'') states that no 
        foreign assistance funds may be used to lobby for or against abortion;
Whereas, in 1984, President Ronald Reagan established the ``Mexico City 
        Policy,'' which prohibits foreign aid for family planning purposes from 
        being given to foreign nongovernmental organizations that perform 
        abortions or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, 
        regardless of the source of funding;
Whereas, upon assuming office on January 20, 1989, President George H.W. Bush 
        continued to enforce the Mexico City Policy as established by President 
        Reagan;
Whereas the Mexico City Policy was reestablished on January 22, 2001, by 
        President George W. Bush; and
Whereas, on January 23, 2009, President Barack Obama rescinded the Mexico City 
        Policy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the President should immediately reapply and consider 
        improving the Mexico City Policy; and
            (2) Congress should expeditiously consider statutory 
        changes that permanently codify the Mexico City Policy or an 
        improved version thereof.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ralph Staiger, Appellant.

Order, entered on October 31,1958, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


IN ACCORDANCE WITH 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of Wound Management Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Lutz, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April 26, 2012


/S/    Robert Lutz, Jr.


Robert Lutz, Jr.,


Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 13 Filed: 08/01/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:38
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 13 Filed: 08/01/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:39
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 13 Filed: 08/01/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:40
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 13 Filed: 08/01/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:41
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 13 Filed: 08/01/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:42
Case: 1:12-cr-00500 Document #: 13 Filed: 08/01/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:43
218.202 Defense or recovery from certain events. For acquisitions that, as determined by the head of the contracting activity, are to facilitate defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack; to facilitate provision of international disaster assistance; or to support response to an emergency or major disaster, the following requirements do not apply: ( 1 ) *Policy for unique item identification at 211.274-2(a).* Contractors are not required to provide DoD unique item identification if the items are to be used to facilitate defense against or recovery from nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack. However, contractors are not exempt from this requirement if the items are to be used to facilitate defense against or recovery from cyber attack. See 211.274-2(b).
( 2 ) *Only one offer requirements at section* 215.371-2. See 215.371-4(a)(2).
( 3 ) *Approval of determination and findings for time-and-materials or labor-hour contracts at 216.601(d)(i)(A)(1) and (2).* See 216.601(d)(3).
[83 FR 24890, May 30, 2018]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

GLEN ELLYN PHARMACY, INC., ) 

on behalf of itself and a class, ) 

) 

 Plaintiff, ) 12 CV 4513 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) Honorable Judge Amy J. St. Eve 

MHC MEDICAL PRODUCTS, LLC, ) Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez 

and JOHN DOES 1-10, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS

 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), 

hereby stipulates and agrees to the dismissal of Plaintiff’s individual claims against Defendant 

with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs. Plaintiff's class claims are dismissed 

without prejudice and with each party bearing its own costs. This stipulation of dismissal 

disposes of the entire action. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

GLEN ELLYN PHARMACY, INC. MHC MEDICAL PRODUCTS, LLC 

/s/ Dulijaza Clark /s/ Richard T. Lauer 

By One of Its Attorneys By One of Its Attorneys 

Dulijaza (Julie) Clark Richard T. Lauer 

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER Robbins, Kelly, Patterson & Tucker 

& Goodwin, LLC 7 West 7th Street, Suite 1400 

120 S. LaSalle Street, 18th Floor Cincinnati, OH 45202 

Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: 513-721-3330 

Telephone: 312/739-4200 Facsimile: 513-721-5001 

Facsimile: 312/419-0379 

Case: 1:12-cv-04513 Document #: 17 Filed: 08/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:66
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

I, Dulijaza Clark, certify that on August 24, 2012, I caused a true and accurate copy of 

the foregoing document to be served via Electronic Mail and US Mail on the following party: 

 

 Richard T. Lauer 

 Robbins, Kelly, Patterson & Tucker 

 7 West 7th Street, Suite 1400 

 Cincinnati, OH 45202 

 RLauer@RKPT.com

 

 /s/ Dulijaza Clark 

 Dulijaza Clark 

Daniel A. Edelman 

Cathleen M. Combs 

James O. Latturner 

Dulijaza Clark 

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER & GOODWIN, LLC 

120 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1800 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

(312) 739-4200 

(312) 419-0379 (FAX)

Case: 1:12-cv-04513 Document #: 17 Filed: 08/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:67
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Cassisa, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 15, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree, two counts of grand larceny in the second degree, one count of grand larceny in the first degree, and two counts of assault in the second degree, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed (Code Crim. Pro., § 542). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### 237.170 Approval of contracts and task orders for services.
#### 2401.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) requires that Federal agencies obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before collecting information from 10 or more persons. HUD has received approval from OMB to collect information under the provisions of its Acquisition Regulation. The OMB Approval Number is 2535-0091.

[50 FR 46575, Nov. 8, 1985. Redesignated at 61 FR 19470, May 1, 1996]
Exhibit 31.1

                                 Certifications

I, Boris Zilbermints, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chaparral Resources,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and weaknesses in the design or operation
          of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
          likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.



Date: May 11, 2006



/s/  Boris Zilbermints
-----------------------
Boris Zilbermints
Chief Executive Officer
October 30, 2007

Dear School Official:

Following the heartbreaking event at Virginia Tech in April of this year, President Bush asked former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt, and me to lead a national dialogue regarding steps the nation can take to prevent such tragedies at schools in the future.  We toured the country talking to state and local leaders, educators, mental health experts, parents, students and law enforcement officials about issues affecting the safety and well-being of students, faculty and staff.  There were several recurring themes heard across the country.  These included the need for additional guidance on the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), the federal law that protects the privacy of students' education records, as well as information on resources that are available to help schools and institutions of higher education plan for, respond to and recover from a serious incident.

In response to these comments, I am pleased to provide you with the enclosed brochures on FERPA as a timely refresher to help you appropriately balance student privacy and school safety, as well as with a handout summarizing key emergency management resources available to you.

The FERPA brochures for school officials include contact information for obtaining additional guidance and assistance.  Understanding the law empowers school officials to act quickly and decisively when problems arise.  We have also included a separate brochure for parents that we encourage you to distribute.  A copy of the brochures may be found on the Department's Web site at: http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/safeschools/index.html.

The handout on emergency management resources includes a variety of materials developed by the Department of Education and our partners in the federal sector.  Although it is not a comprehensive list of all available resources, it is a useful summary of key resources that will assist you in the development of an emergency management plan for your school and/or community.  I encourage you to consider the enclosed information and to include it on your school Web site.

Nothing is more important to Americans than the safety of their children.  FERPA is not intended to be an obstacle in achieving that goal.  I hope that the brochures and handout will be of help to you in safeguarding the students for whom you are responsible.  May our tribute to those we lost in Virginia be our commitment to forestall tragedies such as the one that took their lives.

| | Sincerely,        
| | ------------------
| | /s/               
| | Margaret Spellings

Enclosure 1: FERPA Brochures

Enclosure 2: Emergency Management for Schools: Key Resources

|Last Modified: 10/30/2007
|-------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 44 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.44
                                       Agreed to August 28, 2018        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in recognition of the long and distinguished service rendered to 
the Nation by John Sidney McCain, III, a Senator from the State of 
Arizona and formerly a Representative from that State, his remains be 
permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol on August 31 
and September 1, 2018, and the Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives, shall take all necessary steps for the 
accomplishment of that purpose.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
246.407 Nonconforming supplies or services. ( f ) If nonconforming material or services are discovered after acceptance, the defect appears to be the fault of the contractor, any warranty has expired, and there are no other contractual remedies, the contracting officer— ( i ) Shall notify the contractor in writing of the nonconforming material or service;
( ii ) Shall request that the contractor repair or replace the material, or perform the service, at no cost to the Government; and
( iii ) May accept consideration if offered. For guidance on solicitation of a refund, see subpart 242.71.
(S-70) The head of the design control activity is the approval authority for acceptance of any nonconforming aviation or ship critical safety items or nonconforming modification, repair, or overhaul of such items (see 209.270). Authority for acceptance of minor nonconformances in aviation or ship critical safety items may be delegated as determined appropriate by the design control activity. See additional information at PGI 246.407. [56 FR 36460, July 31, 1991, as amended at 67 FR 4208, Jan. 29, 2002; 69 FR 55989, Sept. 17, 2004; 70 FR 57190, Sept. 30, 2005; 73 FR 1828, Jan. 10, 2008]
#### 225.7705 Prohibition on use of funds for contracts of certain programs and projects in Afghanistan that cannot be safely accessed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                       652
<INVENTORY>                                     65,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,856
<PP&E>                                         216,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                 122,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,582
<BONDS>                                        145,683
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,575
<PREFERRED>                                     15,640
<COMMON>                                         5,858
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,067
<SALES>                                        317,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,945
<CGS>                                          219,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  287,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,050)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,330
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
        

</TABLE>
**Overview**

The starting point for prevention of civil rights concerns is the issuance of comprehensive policies prohibiting discrimination within all programs and activities. Such policies place staff students and the public on notice regarding expectations and also provide standards for taking actions when problems arise. 

Comprehensive polices are needed but schools and colleges may also wish to issue specific policies addressing certain types of discrimination such as sexual harassment. Notices of nondiscrimination are required under most laws we enforce. We provide the links to the relevant regulations and a model notice. State agencies may also have specific civil rights notice requirements that must be complied with. Contact your state education agency for information regarding state notice requirements.

**Federal Notice Requirements:**-  Title IX
-  Section 504
-  Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act
-  Age Discrimination Act

**OCR Model Notice and Summary of Requirements**

**Checklist for developing an anti-harassment policy**
Top  Last Modified: 02/16/2022
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BRAULIO GONZALEZ-TEJEDA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50435

D.C. No. 3:12-cr-02967-WQH-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 8, 2015** 

Pasadena California

Before: SILVERMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges and DONATO,*** District Judge. 

FILED

APR 10 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable James Donato, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
Defendant Braulio Gonzalez-Tejeda appeals the district court’s denial of his

8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) motion to dismiss the indictment. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm the conviction. 

The district court did not err when it considered judicially noticeable

conviction documents not admitted at the removal hearing to decide whether the

defendant had a plausible claim for relief from removal, i.e., whether the defendant

was removable as charged for having committed a drug trafficking aggravated

felony. United States v. Bustos-Ochoa, 704 F.3d 1053, 1056-57 (9th Cir. 2012)

(per curiam), amended, 714 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2013). The defendant cannot

prove prejudice because the conviction documents confirm the defendant’s

admission to the immigration judge that the conviction was a drug trafficking

aggravated felony. Id. 

Because the defendant cannot prove prejudice, in any event, we do not reach

his argument that his administrative appeal waiver was not considered and

intelligent. 

AFFIRMED.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
#### 252.212-7002 [Reserved]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIEL EVENT, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

SAMANTHA GREENBERG,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-3151

[August 24, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Keathan B. Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE20-

006186.

Alan G. Kipnis of Government Law Group, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Jessica Serell Erenbaum of Venable, LLP, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.