alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         333,015
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  782,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,908
<INVENTORY>                                     77,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,000,589
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,812,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,162,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,112,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,723,765
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,122,811)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,162,044
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               403,318
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  610,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (207,342)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (207,342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (30,839)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (238,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 03/16/2015 10:17:53 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Functional Statements > Office for Civil Rights

## Office for Civil Rights (OCR)

-  OCR Introduction
-  Immediate Office of the Assistant Secretary
-  OCR Metro Region
- OCR Organization Chart   PDF 206KB
- OCR Resource Management Group Organization Chart   PDF 167KB
- OCR OPEN Center Organization Chart   PDF 224KB
- OCR Delegations of  Authority
  Last Modified: 04/12/2023
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of the
Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, I,
David F. White, Controller of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
            in all material respects, the financial condition and results
            of operations of the Trust.




                                        /S/David F. White
                                        _________________________________
                                        Controller (chief financial officer
					and principal accounting officer)
Exhibit 32(a)






CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002


In connection with the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      B. McGehee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:


(1)           the Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)           the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Robert B. McGehee


Robert
      B. McGehee


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer


May
      9, 2006






This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as
      amended.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 2003 (the "Report") by Creative Computer Applications, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies that to their knowledge:



|Date: November 21, 2003                                                        |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/S/ANAHITA VILLAFANEAnahita Villafane, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Creative Computer Applications, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### 230.201 Contract requirements.
#### 236.213 Special procedures for sealed bidding in construction contracting.

If it appears that sufficient funds may not be available for all the desired construction features, consider using a bid schedule with additive or deductive items in accordance with PGI 236.213.

[71 FR 9273, Feb. 23, 2006]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ZAHAR OMAR KHAMIS BIN :

HAMDOUN, :

:

Petitioner, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 05-280 (GK)

:

BARACK OBAMA, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

ORDER

Upon consideration of Petitioner Zahir Omar Khamis Bin Hamdoun’s (ISN 576) Response

to the Court’s February 18, 2010, Order to Show Cause, and Respondents’ Reply thereto, it is hereb7

ORDERED, that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without

prejudice.

March 24, 2010 /s/ 

Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 23 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 23

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal to the Filipino 
                       Veterans of World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2017

  Ms. Hirono submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal to the Filipino 
                       Veterans of World War II.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT THE 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO THE FILIPINO VETERANS OF 
              WORLD WAR II.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on October 25, 2017 for a ceremony to present 
the Congressional Gold Medal collectively to the Filipino Veterans of 
World War II in recognition of their dedicated military service.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
225.871-3 General. ( a ) *Cooperative project authority.* ( 1 ) Departments and agencies, that have authority to do so, may enter into cooperative project agreements with NATO or with one or more member countries of NATO under DoDD 5530.3, International Agreements.
( 2 ) Under laws and regulations governing the negotiation and implementation of cooperative project agreements, departments and agencies may enter into contracts, or incur other obligations, on behalf of other participants without charge to any appropriation or contract authorization.
( 3 ) Agency heads are authorized to solicit and award contracts to implement cooperative projects.
( b ) Contracts implementing cooperative projects shall comply with all applicable laws relating to Government acquisition, unless a waiver is granted under 225.871-4. A waiver of certain laws and regulations may be obtained if the waiver— ( 1 ) Is required by the terms of a written cooperative project agreement;
( 2 ) Will significantly further NATO standardization, rationalization, and interoperability; and
( 3 ) Is approved by the appropriate DoD official.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 31 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.31
                                     Agreed to December 21, 2017        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD THE 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO BOB DOLE.

    (a) Authorization.--The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be 
used on January 17, 2018, for a ceremony to award the Congressional 
Gold Medal to Bob Dole.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Peter A. Calitri, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeals will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged to the February Term, commencing January 30, 1961; the appeals are ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeals are from orders denying without a hearing appellant’s *coram nobis*applications. It appears from the motion papers that appellant either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of his appeals or has full knowledge of their contents. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Slip Op. 10 - 1



## UNI TED STATES COU

RT OF INTERNATIO

NAL TRADE

: SAHA THAI

STEEL PI PE (PUBL I C) : COMPANY L TD., : : Plaintiff, :

: v
. : Be fo re : R

. Ke n t o n M u s gra v e, S en i o r J u d ge : UNI TED STATES, : Consol. C ourt No. 08-00380 : De fe nd a nt, :

: a n d : : AL L I ED TUB E AND COND UI T CORP., : and WHEATL AND TU BE COMPANY, : : De fe nd a nt- I nte rv e no rs
. : : JUDG MENT The plaintiffs ha

ving f iled challeng es t o ce rt ai n fi n d i n gs o f t h e d ef en d an tI n t er n at i onal Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerc e (“ I TA”) sub nom. Circular W elded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From T hailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrat ive Re view , 73 Fe d. Reg

. 61019 (Oc t. 15, 2008), and having c onsolidated those ac tions and interposed motions for judg ment upon the record pursuant to USCI T Rule 56.2, resulting in remand of the matter to the I TA for furt h er considera

tion; and the I TA having filed her ein on Dec ember 14, 2009 its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, da ted Dec ember 11, 2009, pursuant to Slip Op. 09

- 1 1 6 ( O c t

. 1 5 , 2 0 0 9 ) ; a n d t h e c o u rt h a v i n g r e v i e w e d t h e R e d e t e r m i n a t i o n a n d f

i n d i ng it i n acc ordanc e with the orde r of rema nd and not having rec eived a ny comment there on or opposition there to from any

party to this case by

Dec ember

29, 2009; after

due deliber ation, it is t here fore
OR DE RED, AD JU DG ED and D EC RE ED that the I TA’s Results of Redeter mination Pursuant to R emand da ted Dec ember 11, 2009 be, and they here by are , sustained.
/s/ R. Kenton Musgra ve Da t ed : J an u ar y

4 , 2 0 1 0 R

. KE NT ON M US GR AV E , S en i o r J u d ge New Y ork, Ne w York
The Early Childhood and Parent Team of OSERS Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) administers discretionary grants and cooperative agreements for projects that directly support federally established priorities and initiatives to improve current practice or advance the state-of-the-art related to the provision of services for infants, toddlers, and pre-school-aged children with disabilities and for parents of children with disabilities. The team is responsible for administering projects to: 
      - help address state-identified needs for personnel—in early intervention, special education, and related services; and 
      - ensure that those personnel have the necessary skills to be successful. 

In addition, the team is responsible for administering projects to promote the use of technology and projects to provide technical assistance to government and non-profit entities that serve young children with disabilities. The team also manages a program of training and information services for parents of infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities.

**ECPT Staff**

### OSEP Navigation

About OSEP | People and OfficesPrograms and Projects | Grants and FundingLegislation and Policy | Publications and ProductsResearch and Statistics | National Studies | MonitoringContact and Feedback
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.21

              FOURTH AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
         AMSOUTH BANK AND SURGICAL LASER TECHNOLOGIES DATED MAY 31, 2000

RESOLVED, that effective January 1, 2003, AmSouth Bank and Surgical Laser
Technologies, Inc. hereby declare and certify by the signatures indicated below,
that Article V, Section 5.14 shall be added to the Loan Agreement dated May 31,
2000, and as amended pursuant to a First Amendment dated as of February 20,
2002, by a Second Amendment dated as of June 27, 2002, and by a Third Amendment
dated as of February 27, 2003, to read as follows:

"5.14.    GUARANTY OF PARENT COMPANY.

          The Borrower shall cause its parent company, PhotoMedex, Inc., to
guarantee, in an instrument in a form reasonably equivalent to the guaranty
attached hereto, the Borrower's performance under this Loan Agreement."

Accepted and Agreed as of this 27th day of February, 2003.


AmSouth Bank                                Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc.

By: /s/ Rhett D. Jordan                     By:/s/ Jeffrey O'Donnell
Rhett D. Jordan                             Jeffrey O'Donnell
Its Vice President                          Its President and CEO

                                            By: /s/ Dennis McGrath
                                            Dennis McGrath
                                            Its Chief Financial Officer

In assent herewith:                         PhotoMedex, Inc.

                                            By /s/ Jeffrey O'Donnell
                                            Jeffrey O'Donnell
                                            Its President and CEO

                                            By: /s/ Dennis McGrath
                                            Dennis McGrath
                                            Its Chief Financial Officer
3D 

version 

(Watts)

Settings 2D to 3D 

(Watts) Settings 2D (Watts) Settings

3D 

version 

(Watts)

135.0 Cinema 134.8 Cinema 132.3 Cinema 134.2

135.6 Cinema 135.6 Cinema 93.4 Standard 135.5

312.3 Cinema 312.9 Cinema 169.7 Cinema 426.2

311.7 Cinema 314.7 Cinema 167.5 Cinema 425.2

88.2 Brilliant 89.1 Brilliant 112.4 Brilliant 95.8

88.7 Brilliant 91.6 Brilliant 110.2 Brilliant 95.3

138.36 Standard 138.43 Standard 111.1 Standard

138.54 Standard ** Standard 112.14 Standard

n/a Standard 138.14 Standard n/a Standard

364.8 Standard 365.7 Standard 210.48 Standard

364.8 Standard 366.9 Standard 213.66 Standard

n/a Standard 367.6 Standard n/a Standard

**This configuration of player, TV, and disc, does not perform the requested test. The left eye content is displayed 

TV A

52" LED Backlit

TV B

54" Plasma

TV C

32" LED Backlit

TV 1

40" LED Backlit

TV

Home

Television 3D Mode

TV 11

63" Plasma

The Television 3D Mode Data contains TV energy consumption data as to TV energy consumption while in 

various 3D modes. This testing was conducted on five TVs under the following modes:: including when the TV 

is displaying a 3D video signal, when the TV is up-converting a 2D video signal to 3D, and when the TV is 

receiving a video signal from a Blu-ray player that has up-converted a 2D video signal to 3D. 

Note: TV A switched to Vivid mode when in 2D and connected to Blu-Ray Player 2

Note: TV C had more energy consumption in 2D than in 3D
Settings 2D to 3D 

(Watts) Settings 2D (Watts) Settings

Cinema 134.1 Cinema 131.7 Cinema Blu-Ray Player 1 0.09%

Cinema 135.3 Cinema 156.5 Vivid Blu-Ray Player 2 0.00%

Vivid 426.9 Vivid 424.7 Vivid Blu-Ray Player 1 -0.20%

Vivid 413.0 Vivid 424.5 Vivid Blu-Ray Player 2 -0.96%

Super 

Brilliant 95.7

Super 

Brilliant 111.3

Super 

Brilliant Blu-Ray Player 1 -1.01%

Super 

Brilliant 96.8

Super 

Brilliant 110.3

Super 

Brilliant Blu-Ray Player 2 -3.31%

140.34 Dynamic Blu-Ray Player 2 -0.05%

141.86 Dynamic Blu-Ray Player 1 N/A

n/a Dynamic TV Conversion N/A

395.96 Dynamic Blu-Ray Player 2 -0.25%

398.22 Dynamic Blu-Ray Player 1 -0.58%

n/a Dynamic TV Conversion N/A

eft eye content is displayed on one side of the screen and the right eye is displayed on the other. 

Not Applicable

Retail

Blu-Ray Player Percent Difference 

Home (3D/2D to 3D)

Not Applicable

nsumption while in 

including when the TV 

d when the TV is 
0.10% 2.04% 1.95%

0.10% 45.20% -13.46%

-0.17% 83.98% 0.34%

2.87% 86.04% 0.17%

0.05% -21.47% -13.99%

-1.60% -19.51% -13.63%

N/A 24.58% N/A

N/A 23.54% N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A 73.32% N/A

N/A 70.74% N/A

N/A N/A N/A

Percent 

Increase 

from 2D 

to 3D 

Percent Difference 

Retail (3D/2D to 3D)

Percent 

Increase 

from 2D 

to 3D
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1677
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES EDWARD LITMAN, Claimant - Appellant, and 1983 BMW 528I, VIN WBADK7302D7956669, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-89-1274-JFM) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Edward Litman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eugene Sims, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for return of forfeited property. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Litman , No. CA-89-1274-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the Annual Report of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending October 27, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I,
Lawrence Butler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.




/s/ Lawrence Butler
-------------------
Lawrence Butler
Chief Executive Officer
February 6, 2003
#### 2452.233-70 Review of contracting officer protest decisions.

As prescribed in 2433.106, insert the following provision:

# Review of Contracting Officer Protest Decisions (FEB 2006)

(a) In accordance with FAR 33.103 and HUDAR 2433.103, a protester may request an appeal of the Contracting Officer's decision concerning a protest initially made by the protester to the Contracting Officer. The protestor must submit a written request for an appeal to [*insert name of HCA and address*] not later than 10 days after the protestor's receipt of the Contracting Officer's decision (see FAR 33.101 for the definition of “days”).

(b) The HCA shall make an independent review of the Contracting Officer's decision and provide the protester with the HCA's decision on the appeal.

(End of provision)

[71 FR 2440, Jan. 13, 2006]
242.708 Quick-closeout procedure. ( a ) Defense Contract Management Agency administrative contracting officers are authorized to negotiate the settlement of direct and indirect costs for a specific contract, task order, or delivery order to be closed in advance of the determination of final direct costs and indirect rates set forth in FAR 42.705, regardless of the dollar value or percentage of unsettled direct or indirect costs allocable to the contract, task order, or delivery order. ( 2 ) In lieu of the thresholds at FAR 42.708(a)(2)(i) and (ii), the amount of unsettled direct costs and indirect costs to be allocated to the contract, task order, or delivery order will be considered relatively insignificant when the total unsettled direct costs and indirect costs to be allocated to any one contract, task order, or delivery order do not exceed $2 million, regardless of the total contract, task order, or delivery order amount.
[88 FR 12865, Mar. 1, 2023]