alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- OCR Complaint Process
- Sex Discrimination
- Race and National Origin Discrimination
- Age Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act

OCR enforces several Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities that receive Federal funds from the Department of Education. These laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin, sex, disability, and on the basis of age. These laws extend to all state education agencies, elementary and secondary school systems, colleges and universities, vocational schools, proprietary schools, state vocational rehabilitation agencies, libraries, and museums that receive U.S. Department of Education funds. OCR also has responsibilities under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (prohibiting disability discrimination by public entities, whether or not they receive federal financial assistance). In addition, as of January 8, 2002, OCR enforces the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act (Section 9525 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001). Under the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act, no public elementary or secondary school or State or local education agency that provides an opportunity for one or more outside youth or community groups to meet on school premises or in school facilities shall deny equal access or a fair opportunity to meet to, or discriminate against, any group officially affiliated with the Boy Scouts of America, or any other youth group listed in Title 36 of the United States Code as a patriotic society, that wishes to meet at the school.

Top
Color photoSmall

Color photoLarge

Black and white photoSmall

Black and white photoLarge

For additional photos, visit the Press Room's photo area.

|Last Modified: 06/06/2005
|-------------------------
Exhibit
10.17


 


WGI SUB, LLC


17103 PRESTON ROAD, SUITE
200


DALLAS, TEXAS 75248


 


May 5, 2009


 


Global Geophysical Services, Inc.


3535 Briarpark Drive, Suite 200


Houston, Texas 77042


 


Re:                             Subordinated
Promissory Note dated as of December 10, 2008 (as amended, supplemented or
otherwise modified, the “Note”), by and
among GLOBAL GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”), and WGI SUB, LLC, a Texas limited liability company
(“Payee”)


 


Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to the Note.  Terms that are defined in the Note and not
otherwise defined herein are used herein with the meanings given them in the
Note.


 


Maker has requested that Payee extend the
required payments of principal and accrued interest that are due and payable on
June 5, 2009.  Accordingly, Maker
and Payee hereby agree that the payment in respect of the Notes due and payable
on June 5, 2009 is hereby extended to June 15, 2009.


 


In order to induce Payee to enter into this
Letter, Maker represents and warrants to Payee that as of the date of this
Letter, no Blockage Default or Senior Indebtedness Acceleration has occurred
and is continuing and no Standstill Period is in effect.


 


The Note is hereby ratified and confirmed in
all respects.  Except as expressly set
forth above, the execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Letter shall not
operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of Maker or Payee under the
Note, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Note.


 


THIS LETTER AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE
PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS.


 


This Letter may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an
original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one and the
same instrument.


 

















 


Please execute a counterpart of this Letter
in the place provided below to evidence your agreement to the foregoing and
your continuing ratification of the Note in consideration hereof, whereupon
this Letter shall become effective as of the date first written above.


 


	
   

  	
  Yours
  truly,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  WGI SUB, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Accepted
  and agreed to as of the date first written above:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  GLOBAL GEOPHYSICAL
  SERVICES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  P. Matthew Verghese

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:
  Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

  



 


2
17.500 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart prescribes policies and procedures applicable to all interagency acquisitions under any authority, except as provided for in paragraph (c) of this section. In addition to complying with the interagency acquisition policy and procedures in this subpart, nondefense agencies acquiring supplies and services on behalf of the Department of Defense shall also comply with the policy and procedures at subpart 17.7.
( b ) This subpart applies to interagency acquisitions, see 2.101 for definition, when— ( 1 ) An agency needing supplies or services obtains them using another agency's contract; or
( 2 ) An agency uses another agency to provide acquisition assistance, such as awarding and administering a contract, a task order, or delivery order.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to— ( 1 ) Interagency reimbursable work performed by Federal employees (other than acquisition assistance), or interagency activities where contracting is incidental to the purpose of the transaction; or
( 2 ) Orders of $600,000 or less issued against Federal Supply Schedules.
[75 FR 77735, Dec. 13, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 185, Jan. 3, 2012; 77 FR 69722, Nov. 20, 2012; 80 FR 38298, July 2, 2015; 85 FR 62489, Oct. 2, 2020]
#### 25.702 Prohibition on contracting with entities that conduct restricted business operations in Sudan.
#### 204.402 General.

DoD employees or members of the Armed Forces who are assigned to or visiting a contractor facility and are engaged in oversight of an acquisition program will retain control of their work products, both classified and unclassified (see PGI 204.402).

[71 FR 9268, Feb. 23, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 76319, Dec. 7, 2011]
#### 222.7400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements section 8116 of the Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-118) and similar sections in subsequent DoD appropriations acts.

[76 FR 38048, June 29, 2011]
#### 213.104 Promoting competition.

For information on the various approaches that may be used to competitively fulfill DoD requirements, see PGI 213.104.

[80 FR 21657, Apr. 20, 2015]
On April 10, 2013 President Obama released his Fiscal Year 2014 Budget. The following materials are available showing what this budget provides for the programs and activities of the Department of Education:

- Secretary Duncan announced that “we must continue to build on the reforms already transforming classrooms across the country.” Read the  2014 Budget press release.
- The FY 2014 Education Budget Summary and Background Information (PDF, 1M) provides program information and detailed budget tables.
- The FY 2014 Justifications of Appropriations Estimates to the Congress.
- State tables for the FY 2013 appropriation and the FY 2014 President's Budget Request will be posted soon.
- **Cross-cutting issues in the FY 2014 Budget**. These documents highlight a number of issues where the Department makes investments across many different programs and activities including:
	Investing in Early Learning PDF [182K]

College Access, Affordability and Completion PDF [192K]

Improving the Education of High School Students PDF [212K]

Career Readiness PDF [169KB]

Supporting Individuals with Disabilities PDF [92K]

Strengthening the Commitment to Native American Communities PDF [202K]

Supporting English Learners PDF [197K]

Serving the Needs of Disadvantaged Students PDF [155K]

Supporting Rural Education PDF [170K]

Improving Productivity and Efficiency PDF [112K]

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education PDF [204K]
- Investing in Early Learning PDF [182K]
- College Access, Affordability and Completion PDF [192K]
- Improving the Education of High School Students PDF [212K]
- Career Readiness PDF [169KB]
- Supporting Individuals with Disabilities PDF [92K]
- Strengthening the Commitment to Native American Communities PDF [202K]
- Supporting English Learners PDF [197K]
- Serving the Needs of Disadvantaged Students PDF [155K]
- Supporting Rural Education PDF [170K]
- Improving Productivity and Efficiency PDF [112K]
- Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education PDF [204K]

The President's FY 2014 Budget for the entire United States Government is available online.

|Last Modified: 02/03/2014
|-------------------------
Exhibit 10(a)

                         Consent of Edwin L. Kerr, Esq.





<PAGE>





To Whom It May Concern:

         I hereby consent to the reference to my name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Prospectus contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-78761) filed by PHL Variable
Accumulation Account with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933.


                                               Very truly yours,


Dated:      April 28, 2000                     /s/ Edwin L. Kerr
                                               -----------------

                                               Edwin L. Kerr, Counsel
                                               PHL Variable Insurance Company
233.104 Protests to GAO. ( c ) *Protests after award.* (1) In lieu of the time periods in FAR 33.104(c)(1), contracting officers shall immediately suspend performance or terminate the awarded contract, task order, or delivery order upon notice from the GAO of a protest filed within the time periods listed in paragraphs (c)(1)(A) through (D) of this section, whichever is later, except as provided in FAR 33.104(c)(2) and ( 3 ) — ( A ) Within 10 days after the date of contract award;
( B ) Within 10 days after the date a task order or delivery order is issued, where the value exceeds $25 million (10 U.S.C. 3406(f));
( C ) Within 5 days after a debriefing date offered to the protestor under a timely debriefing request in accordance with FAR 15.506 regardless of whether the protestor rejected the offered debriefing date, unless an earlier debriefing date is negotiated as a result; or
( D ) Within 5 days after a postaward debriefing under FAR 15.506 is concluded in accordance with 215.506-70(b).
[87 FR 15811, Mar. 18, 2022, as amended at 87 FR 76995, Dec. 16, 2022]
225.7021-4 Solicitation provision and contract clause. ( a ) Use the provision at 252.225-7057, Preaward Disclosure of Employment of Individuals Who Work in the People's Republic of China, in solicitations that include the clause at 252.225-7058.
( b ) Unless a waiver has been granted, use the clause at 252.225-7058, Postaward Disclosure of Employment of Individuals Who Work in the People's Republic of China, in solicitations and contracts with an estimated value in excess of $5 million.
[87 FR 52342, Aug. 25, 2022]
#### STARR v. RITCHIE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. New Trial—Inadequacy of Damages—Review.

An order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the minutes after verdict, for inadequacy of damages, will not be reversed on appeal, unless actual and obvious injustice has resulted from the exercise of the court’s discretion.

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term.

Action by Theodore B. Starr against Adele Ritchie. From an order of the City Court granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the minutes after verdict, for inadequacy of damages, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Meyer Greenberg, for appellant.

Philip Carpenter, for respondent.

*918PER CURIAM.

The award of damages was inadequate where tested by the apparent probabilities as to the defendant’s express or implied promise to pay for the item of resetting, and the presiding justice’s estimate of the relative credibility of two opposed witnesses upon the issue of an express agreement may well have led to the further strengthening of the case for the plaintiff. The advantages possessed by the justice below in hearing the - testimony as given enters to some extent into the inquiry upon a review of his direction of a new trial after verdict (Lund v. Spencer, 42 App. Div. 543, 59 N. Y. Supp. 752), and the order is not to be disturbed unless actual and obvious injustice has resulted from this exercise of discretion at the trial (Id.). It appears to us that there was not only no injustice to the defendant in this case, but that the trial justice’s discretion was quite commendably exercised.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
#### Alfred J. Zahra et al., Respondents, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[834 NYS2d 143]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered May 31, 2006, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion to strike certain allegations from the plaintiffs’ complaint, bill of particulars and supplemental bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs stated in their original notice of claim that they were asserting a cause of action under General Municipal Law § 205-a. Necessarily, this gave defendant notice of a claim that plaintiff firefighter’s injuries were the “result of . . . neglect, omission, willful or culpable negligence of’ defendant “in failing to comply with the requirements of any of the statutes, ordinances, rules, orders and requirements of the federal, state, county, village, town or city governments or of any and all their departments, divisions and bureaus.” (General Municipal Law § 205-a [1].) Neither the General Municipal Law provisions as to notice of claim nor any governing case law requires a plaintiff alleging a General Municipal Law § 205-a claim to specify in the notice of claim the particular enactment violated *(see Simons v City of New York,*252 AD2d 451, 453 [1998]). We do not find plaintiffs’ allegation in the complaint as to specific Administrative Code sections insufficient at this stage. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Patrick L. Milton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Terabeam,
Inc., certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Terabeam, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: March 30, 2006                   /s/ Patrick L. Milton
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Patrick L. Milton
                                     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(July 9, 1964)

#### Domenico Bavaro et al., Respondents, v. Econ-O-Wash of New Jersey, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In a holdover proceeding, the tenants, by permission of this court, appeal from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, made December 6, 1963, which affirmed a final order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered December 5, 1962, after trial, in the landlords’ favor, awarding possession of the subject premises to the landlords. Order of the Appellate Term and final order of the Civil Court of the City of New York reversed on the law and the facts, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term, and petition dismissed, with costs. Findings of fact in the courts below which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. In, our opinion the record establishes that by their conduct the landlords waived the provisions in the lease against assignment without their written consent. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence Condon, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from two orders of the County Court, Kings County: (1) an order dated October 5, 1960, which denied, with*658out a hearing, his *comm nobis*application *to*vacate a judgment of said court rendered May 7, 1942 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of robbery in the second degree unarmed, and sentencing him to serve a term of 7% to 15 years; and (2) an order dated April 17,1961, which denied, without a hearing, another *coram nobis*application made by him to vacate said judgment. Order of October 5, 1960 affirmed. We have examined the relevant prison records and find therein no factual support for defendant’s conclusory assertion that he was mentally incompetent at the times he pleaded guilty and was sentenced. Order of April 17, 1961 affirmed. In our opinion, the procedure followed at the time defendant pleaded guilty sufficiently complied with the requirements of sections 333, 334 and 335 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (cf. *People*v. *Sadness,*300 N. Y. 69; *People*v. *Fink,*8 A D 2d 859). Nor was there a lack of due process merely because defendant was not interrogated as to his understanding of the proceedings at the time he pleaded guilty (People v. *Hernandez,*8 N Y 2d 345, 348). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 18. Reconnaissance single-beam and multibeam bathymetry       collected during National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration survey       H11346. Hotter colors are shallower areas; cooler colors are deeper areas.       See key for depth ranges. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig18.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:20:58 EDT
#### 209.470 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

       Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                 of Title 18 of the United States Code


I, Joseph F. Kruy, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
Cambex Corporation, certify that

(i) This quarterly report on Form 10QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(ii) The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Cambex Corporation.


Dated: May 11, 2007     /s/ Joseph F. Kruy
                             Joseph F. Kruy
                             President and Treasurer
                             [principal executive officer and
                              principal financial officer]


This certification accompanies this quarterly report pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
242.7503 Contract clause. Use the clause at 252.242-7006, Accounting System Administration, in solicitations and contracts when contemplating— ( a ) A cost-reimbursement, incentive type, time-and-materials, or labor-hour contract; or
( b ) A contract with progress payments made on the basis of costs incurred by the contractor or on a percentage or stage of completion.
[76 FR 28870, May 18, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 11366, Feb. 24, 2012; 82 FR 61481, Dec. 28, 2017]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 10, 2014

No. 04-13-00876-CV

IN THE MATTER OF R.D.,

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-JUV-01230

The Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Brief is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### 2433.102-70 Responsibility.

With the exception of protests filed directly with the Department pursuant to FAR 33.103, the Office of General Counsel has responsibility for handling matters relating to protests against award of contracts by the Department. All written communications from the Department to the GAO or other adjudicating body shall be made by the Office of General Counsel. The Contracting Officer has responsibility for furnishing the Office of General Counsel with all information relating to a protest.

[64 FR 46097, Aug. 23, 1999]