alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 135 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2017, as ‘‘Silver Star 

Service Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2017 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

MAY 1, 2017 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2017, 

as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

who were wounded or became ill in combat in the wars 

fought by the United States; 

Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to 

help the people of the United States remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill members of the 

Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 135 ATS 

Star Service Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose; 

Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of 

America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices made by 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans on behalf of 

the United States through the presence of a Silver Star 

Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying; 

Whereas the sacrifices made by members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans on behalf of the United States 

should never be forgotten; and 

Whereas May 1, 2017, is an appropriate date to designate as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of May 1, 2017, as 

3 ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’; and 

4 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

5 to observe Silver Star Service Banner Day with ap6 propriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
##### 



Page 40

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cato Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 2, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael O. Moore
Michael O. Moore
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Protecting Students

**Overview**  The  Office for Civil Rights (OCR) enforces the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access  Act in public schools, LEAs and SEAs that receive Federal funds made available  through the Department of Education. The Boy Scouts Act is part of the No  Child Left Behind Act of 2001 that amended the Elementary and Secondary  Education Act of 1965. Under the Boy Scouts Act, no such public school, LEA or  SEA that provides an opportunity for one or more outside youth or community  groups to meet on school premises or in school facilities shall deny equal  access or a fair opportunity to meet to, or discriminate against, any group  officially affiliated with the Boy Scouts of America, or any other youth group  listed in Title 36 of the United States Code as a patriotic society, that wishes  to meet at the school.OCR is charged with enforcing the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act.  Complaints alleging violations of this law may be filed using the OCR online complaint  form or  by contacting the OCR office with authority to handle complaints where the  institution or entity you are complaining about is located.

 

----

 

              - Laws  Case Resolutions                     Last Modified: 01/12/2022
#### Aiken *et al. v.*Weldon *et al.*

November 14, 1912.

Lumpkin, J.

1. This case is controlled by the ruling in *Humtress*v. *Anderson,*110 *Ga.*427 (35 S. E. 671, 78 Am. St. R. 105), where the decision in *Love*v. *Anderson,*89 *Ga.*612 (16 S. E. 68), was reviewed and overruled, and it was held that “a deed executed by the head of a family, purporting to convey land which had been . . set apart as a homestead under the constitution of 1868, while inoperative and ineffectual as to the homestead estate in existence when it was made, did pass to the grantee the ‘reversionary interest’ of the grantor in the land described.” This decision has since been followed. *Goodell*v. *Hall,*112 *Ga.*437 (37 S. E. 725); *Walker*v. *Hodges,*113 *Ga.*1042 (39 S. E. 480); *Waters*v. *Waters,*124 *Ga.*349 (52 S. E. 425).

2. Accordingly, where in a suit to recover land the petition showed that a homestead had been taken by the head of 'a family under the constitution of 1868, that pending the existence of the homestead estate the head of the family and his wife joined in a deed purporting to convey a fee-simple estate with warranty, and that after the termination of the homestead estate the heirs of the grantors brought suit against the grantees to recover possession of the land, the case was properly dismissed on demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*16Complaint for land. Before Judge Daniel. Fayette superior court. September 29, 1911.

*W. B. Hollingsworth, J. W. Culpepper,*and *Daley & Chambers,*for plaintiffs. *J.*IF. *Wise,*for defendants.
CERTIFICATION

Exhibit 32.2

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, amended, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert G. Gargus, Chief Financial Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company) hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



| |  |                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | /S/    ROBERT G.
GARGUS                          
| |  | Robert G. Gargus                                 
| |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 30, 2007
February 20, 1975.

M. P. No. 75-17.

#### Thomas Camara *et al. v.*Dennis J. Murphy, *Director of Natural Resources.*

*Breslin, Sweeney & Gordon, David F. Sweeney,*for petitioners. *Julius C. Michael-son,*Attorney General, *Gregory L. Benik,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied for petitioners’ failure to comply with the procedures prescribed by the Administrative Procedures Act. [G. L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §42-35-15].
Functional Statements > Office of Finance and Operations Functional Statement

- OFO Introduction
- Immediate Office of the Assistant Secretary
- Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization
- Office of Equal Employment Opportunity Services
- Office of Management and Planning
- Office of Financial Management
- Office of Acquisition, Grants, and Risk Management
- Office of Human Resources
- Office of Security Facilities and Logistics Services
- Office of Business Support Services

**Organization Chart**
- Office of Finance and Operations Organizational Chart    PDF(739KB)
- Office of Human Resources Organizational Chart    PDF(233KB)
Delegations of Authority
OFO Delegations of Authority may be found at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/or/delegations/ofo.html
  Last Modified: 04/20/2023
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Julio Perez, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-14-00065-CV v.

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et 

al., Appellees

Appeal from the 5th District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

13C1819-005). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Carter*, participating. *Justice Carter,

Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Julio Perez, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 20, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 1 of 27 PageID #:585
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 2 of 27 PageID #:586
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 3 of 27 PageID #:587
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 4 of 27 PageID #:588
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 5 of 27 PageID #:589
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 6 of 27 PageID #:590
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 7 of 27 PageID #:591
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 8 of 27 PageID #:592
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 9 of 27 PageID #:593
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 10 of 27 PageID #:594
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 11 of 27 PageID #:595
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 12 of 27 PageID #:596
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 13 of 27 PageID #:597
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 14 of 27 PageID #:598
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 15 of 27 PageID #:599
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 16 of 27 PageID #:600
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 17 of 27 PageID #:601
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 18 of 27 PageID #:602
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 19 of 27 PageID #:603
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 20 of 27 PageID #:604
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 21 of 27 PageID #:605
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 22 of 27 PageID #:606
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 23 of 27 PageID #:607
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 24 of 27 PageID #:608
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 25 of 27 PageID #:609
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 26 of 27 PageID #:610
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-5 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 27 of 27 PageID #:611
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2004-EM-505017, styled In the Interest of A.V., A Child, in the 73rd

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. Although the Honorable Renée McElhaney presides over the 73rd Judicial

District Court, the contempt order in this case was signed by Associate Judge Jim Rausch.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00289-CV

EX PARTE Ruben VASQUEZ

Writ of Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 28, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

On April 9, 2010, relator Ruben Vasquez filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, apparently

seeking relief from an order holding him in contempt for failure to pay child support arrearages and

attorney’s fees related thereto. Vasquez filed supplements to his petition on April 12, 2010, and

April 13, 2010. We have reviewed the documents filed by relator and are unable to determine the

grounds upon which he seeks relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(h) (petition must contain clear and

concise argument for contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to appendix or

record). Moreover, relator has not provided this Court with a single document in support of his
04-10-00210-CR

-2-

petition. A relator has the burden of providing this court with a record sufficient to establish a right

to relief. See TEX.R.APP. P. 52.7(a) (requiring relator to file with petition a certified or sworn copy

of every document material to relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying

proceeding); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), (D). Based on the foregoing, we conclude

relator has not shown himself entitled to relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus

is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

       Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                 of Title 18 of the United States Code


I, Joseph F. Kruy, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
Cambex Corporation, certify that

(i) This quarterly report on Form 10QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(ii) The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Cambex Corporation.


Dated: November 13, 2006     /s/ Joseph F. Kruy
                             Joseph F. Kruy
                             President and Treasurer
                             [principal executive officer and
                              principal financial officer]


This certification accompanies this quarterly report pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
247.573 General. ( a ) *Delegated authority.* Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2631(a) and Secretary of Defense Memorandum dated February 7, 2012, (see PGI 245.573) the authority to make determinations of excessive ocean liner rates and excessive charter rates is delegated to— ( 1 ) The Commander, United States Transportation Command, for excessive ocean liner rate determinations; and
( 2 ) The Secretary of the Navy for excessive charter rate determinations.
( b ) *Procedures.* ( 1 ) Contracting officers shall follow the procedures at PGI 247.573(b)(1) when purchase of ocean transportation services is incidental to a contract for supplies, services, or construction.
( 2 ) Contracting officers shall follow the procedures at PGI 247.573(b)(2) when direct purchase of ocean transportation services is the principal purpose of the contract.
( 3 ) Agency and department procedures relating to annual reporting requirements of information received from offerors in response to solicitation provision 252.247-7026, Evaluation Preference for Use of Domestic Shipyards—Applicable to Acquisition of Carriage by Vessel for DoD Cargo in the Coastwise of Noncontiguous Trade, are found at PGI 247.573(b)(3).
( 4 ) Procedures are provided at PGI 247.573(b)(4) to accomplish security background checks pursuant to clause 252.247-7027, Riding Gang Member Requirements.
[79 FR 61583, Oct. 14, 2014]
Functional Statements > Office of English Language Acquisition

## Immediate Office Of The Assistant Deputy Secretary And Director

The Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director of OELA serves as the principal advisor to the Secretary on Departmental matters related to Title III programs which provides services to linguistically and culturally diverse students. The Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director coordinates with other programs in the Department serving EL students and provides national leadership and support for the programs and activities for which administrative authority have been delegated by the Secretary. The Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director, through his/her office, finalizes policy and national dissemination efforts of multilingual initiatives and other programs that serve English learners. The Office of the Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director is also responsible for the coordination and implementation of outreach activities with OELA’s various constituencies. 

TOP
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

TODD L. BOWERS, INC., )

on behalf of itself and all other similarly )

situated, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 03436

)

RBS CITIZENS, N.A., and )

CITIZENS BANK of PENNSYLVANIA, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF FILING AND PROOF OF SERVICE

Please take notice that on the 1

st

day of August 2012, the undersigned shall cause to be

filed with the Clerk For United States District Court For The Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division, SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT, a copy of which is

hereby served upon you.

By: s/ David C. Thollander

David C. Thollander

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, David C. Thollander, an attorney, hereby state that I served this SECOND

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT by electronic service through the CM/ECF

system or about the hour of 5:00 p.m. on the 1

st

day of August 2012.

/s/ David C. Thollander

David C. Thollander

The Thollander Law Firm, Ltd.

1048 Ogden Avenue

Suite 200

Downers Grove, Illinois 60515

Phone: (630) 971 - 9195

Facsimile: (630) 971-9240

ARDC Number: 6202012

Case: 1:12-cv-03436 Document #: 44 Filed: 08/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:364
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7628

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
TERRENCE TERRILL BENNEKIN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cr - 00754

- BHH

- 1 )

Submitted : April 21, 2021 Decided: May 11, 2021

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Terrence Terrill Bennekin, Appellant Pro Se. Derek Alan Shoemake, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Unpubli shed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Terrence Terrill Bennekin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record
and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Bennekin , No. 4:14

- cr - 00754

- BHH

- 1 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
present ed in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      367
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,511
<PP&E>                                          57,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              100
<BONDS>                                         34,915
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,692
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,540
<SALES>                                          3,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,290
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    264
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       264
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05252

Honorable Marvin E. Aspen

Jay Marshall Strabala

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, September 4, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Geraldine Soat Brown: Telephone status hearing

held. At the joint request of the parties, settlement conference previously set for 11/8/12 at

11:00 a.m. is stricken and reset to12/13/12 at 11:00 a.m. The schedule for the exchange of

letters remains the same. Following the exchange of letters, counsel for the parties shall

have a telephone conference to see whether this case can settle on the basis of the letters.

In court status hearing is set for 11/8/2012 at 9:45 a.m. Notices mailed by Judicial

staff.(psm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05252 Document #: 60 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:862