Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 17 / Thursday, January 28, 2021 / Notices 7357 

5 Id. 

1See Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 85 FR 

67332 (October 22, 2020) (Preliminary Results). 

2 In separate scope rulings, Commerce determined 

that: (a) D(-) Phenylglycine Ethyl Dane Salt is 

outside the scope of the order and (b) Chineseglycine exported from India remains the same class 

or kind of merchandise as the China-origin glycine 

imported into India. See Notice of Scope Rulings 

and Anticircumvention Inquiries, 62 FR 62288 

(November 21, 1997) and Glycine from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Partial Affirmative 

Determination of Circumvention of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73426 (December 

10, 2012), respectively. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from the People’s 

Republic of China: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

4See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 67322–23. 

revoked, is provided in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.5 A list of the 

sections in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed on the 

internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed and electronic versions 

of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would likely lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of the dumping margins 

likely to prevail are weighted-average 

dumping margins up to 145.18 percent. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials, or the 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 

CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: January 22, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—Sections in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping 

Likely to Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01909 Filed 1–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Glycine From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) continues to find that 

certain companies covered by this 

administrative review made no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the period of review (POR) 

March 1, 2019, through February 29, 

2020. Commerce also continues to find 

that Avid Organics Private Limited 

(Avid) is part of the China-wide entity. 

DATES: Applicable January 28, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5760. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 22, 2020, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China (China) 

covering the POR.1 We received 

comments from interested parties with 

respect the Preliminary Results. The 

deadline for these final results of review 

is February 19, 2021. We conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this 

antidumping duty order is glycine, 

which is a free-flowing crystalline 

material, like salt or sugar. Glycine is 

produced at varying levels of purity and 

is used as a sweetener/taste enhancer, a 

buffering agent, reabsorbable amino 

acid, chemical intermediate, and a metal 

complexing agent. This proceeding 

includes glycine of all purity levels. 

Glycine is currently classified under 

subheading 2922.49.4020 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS).2 Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

under the order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

The sole issue raised with respect to 

the Preliminary Results by parties to this 

administrative review is addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3

The issue raised by parties and the other 

areas covered in the Issues and Decision 

Memroandum are identified in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The signed and electronic 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes From the Preliminary Results 

We made no revisions to the 

Preliminary Results. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

We preliminarily determined that 

Studio Disrupt, Mulji Mehta 

Enterprises, Kumar Industries, and 

Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., 

Ltd., did not have shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR.4 After the 

Preliminary Results, we received no 

comments or additional information 

with respect to these four companies. 

Therefore, for the final results, we 

7358 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 17 / Thursday, January 28, 2021 / Notices 

5See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 6See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

7See Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony 

With Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Notice of Amended 

Final Results; 2015–2016, 83 FR 49363 (October 1, 

2018) for the calculation of the China-wide rate. 

8See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

61011 (November 12, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 

2Pusan Pipe is the importer of record for all of 

SeAH VINA’s shipments of subject merchandise to 

the United States during the POR. See SSV 

December 13, 2019 Section A Questionnaire 

Response at 1. 

continue to find that these four 

companies did not have shipments of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

We will issue appropriate instructions 

to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) based on these final results. 

China-Wide Entity 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that Avid is ineligible for a separate rate 

and treated it as a part of the Chinawide entity. For the final results, 

Commerce continues to find Avid 

ineligible for a separate rate and to treat 

it as a part of the China-wide entity. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

will determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review.5 Consistent with its recent 

notice,6 Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). We will 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries of 

subject merchandise exported by the 

China-wide entity at the China-wide 

rate of 155.89 percent.7 Consistent with 

Commerce’s assessment practice in nonmarket economy cases, for the 

companies which Commerce 

determined had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries made under those exporters’ case 

numbers (i.e., at the exporters’ rates) 

will be liquidated at the China-wide 

rate.8

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by sections 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters that 

received a separate rate in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all 

Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate for the 

China-wide entity, i.e., 155.89 percent; 

and (3) for all non-Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

The final results of this administrative 

review are issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: January 22, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues 

and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Rescission Request 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01906 Filed 1–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–817] 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that certain oil country tubular goods 

(OCTG) from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam were not sold in the United 

States at less than normal value (NV) 

during the period of review (POR) 

September 1, 2018 through August 31, 

2019. Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable January 28, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2924. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 12, 2019, Commerce 

initiated an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on OCTG from 

Vietnam.1 The review covers SeAH 

Steel VINA Corporation (SeAH VINA) 

and its U.S. affiliate Pusan Pipe 

America, Inc. (Pusan Pipe) (collectively, 

SSV).2 On April 24, 2020, Commerce