alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
[LEGEND]
THIS SCHEDULE HAS BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE COMPANY'S ADOPTION OF 
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "Earnings Per Share"
(FAS 128), AND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
[/LEGEND]
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         137,043
<SECURITIES>                                   959,771
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,672
<INVENTORY>                                     93,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,045,414
<PP&E>                                         772,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                 268,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,010,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,444
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,385
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,599,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,010,995
<SALES>                                        635,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               917,845
<CGS>                                           97,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               363,049
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,972
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            146,432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   146,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Represents Basic earnings per share.
<F2>Restated to reflect the Company's adoption of FAS 128.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
2001.104-2 Arrangement of the regulations. ( a ) *General.* Chapter 20 is divided into parts, subparts, sections, subsections, paragraphs, and further subdivisions as necessary.
( b ) *Numbering.* The numbering system and part, subpart and section titles used in this Chapter conform with those used in the FAR as follows: ( 1 ) Where Chapter 20 implements the FAR or supplements a parallel part, subpart, section, subsection, or paragraph of the FAR, that implementation or supplementation is numbered and captioned to the FAR part, subpart, section, or subsection being implemented or supplemented, except that the implementation or supplementation is preceded with a 20 or 200 so that there will always be four numbers to the left of the decimal. For example, NRC's implementation of FAR 1.104-1 is shown as 2001.104-1 and the NRC's implementation of FAR 24.1 is shown as 2024.1.
( 2 ) When the NRC supplements material contained in the FAR, it is given a unique number containing the numerals “70” or higher. The rest of the number parallels the FAR part, subpart, section, subsection, or paragraph it is supplementing. For example, Section 170A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, requires a more comprehensive organizational conflict of interest review for NRC than is contemplated by FAR 9.5. This supplementary material is identified as 2009.570.
( 3 ) Where material in the FAR requires no implementation or supplementation, there is no corresponding numbering in the NRCAR. Therefore, there may be gaps in the NRCAR sequence of numbers where the FAR requires no further implementation.
( c ) *Citation.* The NRCAR will be cited in accordance with Office of the Federal Register standards approved for the FAR. Thus, this section when referred to in the NRCAR is cited as 2001.104-2(c). When this section is referred to formally in official documents, such as legal briefs, it should be cited as “48 CFR 2001.104-2(c).” Any section of the NRCAR may be formally identified by the section number, e.g., “NRCAR 2001.104-2.” In the NRCAR, any reference to the FAR will be indicated by “FAR” followed by the section number, for example FAR 1-104.
Case: 1:12-cv-01583 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/09/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:206
Case: 1:12-cv-01583 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/09/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:207
Case: 1:12-cv-01583 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/09/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:208
Case: 1:12-cv-01672 Document #: 33 Filed: 09/23/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:170
Case: 1:12-cv-01672 Document #: 33 Filed: 09/23/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:171
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as
 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to the best of our
 knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, of CAPITAL
 REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the financial statements, fully complies with
 the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
 contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
 and results of operations of the small business issuer.

|               |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-II LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                                      
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                                                  
|               |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                                        
|               |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                                                 
|March 29, 2006 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                                              
|DATE           |  | William B. Dockser,
              Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)                       
|March 29, 2006 |  | by:  /s/ H. William Willoughby                                                                                                                                           
|DATE           |  | H. William Willoughby,
              Director, President, Secretary,
                    Principal Financial Officer and
                    Principal Accounting Officer

This
 certification accompanies this annual report and is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose, and shall
 not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended.
#### (A) In the Matter of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Respondent, v. Joseph H. Lyons, Appellant. (B) Leonard A. Meyerson, Appellant, v. Cooney Bros., Inc., Respondent.

[In each action] Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal granted, and appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERTO NIETO CRUZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00190-CR

Appeal from the

147th District Court

of Travis County, Texas 

(TC# D-1-DC-15-300933)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until December 30, 2016. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Kimberly Lee, Court Reporter for the 147th District Court, 

for Travis County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled and numbered 

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before December 30, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5

th day of December, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver

for Broadway Bank

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:12−cv−01665

Honorable John F.

Grady

Demetris Giannoulias, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, October 16, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Daniel G. Martin:Certain Defendants'

Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority in Support of Their Motion to Compel

Subpoena Responses by Third Party FDIC−C [235] is granted. The FDIC−C may file a

short brief addressing the Willetts Order by 10/21/2014. The FDIC−C's brief may not

exceed two pages (double spaced). No appearance is required on the motion on

10/21/2014. (rbf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 237 Filed: 10/16/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4116
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.
1350):

         I, Thomas D. Karol, Chief Executive Officer of ElkCorp, certify to my
knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss. 1350) that:

         (1)      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
                  September 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully
                  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                  for the period ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of ElkCorp.

Date:  November 4, 2003
                                                  By /s/ Thomas D. Karol
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Thomas D. Karol
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
');
	document.write('

ESIP is the U. S. Department of Education’s plan to assist State and local educational agencies (SEAs and LEAs) to improve the implementation of the equitable services requirements under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) for eligible students enrolled in nonprofit private elementary and secondary schools and, as applicable, their teachers and parents.

## **Outreach**

CommunicationsLetters 
Listserv MessagesFAQsConference Call Details

## **Promoting and Encouraging Promising Practices**

States with Private School Working Groups
Examples of Promising Practices
Transparent Processes

## **Technical Assistance**

Webinars
Other Activities

## **Monitoring**

Top
217.7103-2 Period of agreement. ( a ) Master agreements remain in effect until canceled by either the contractor or the contracting officer.
( b ) Master agreements can be canceled by either the contractor or the contracting officer by giving 30 days written notice to the other.
( c ) Cancellation of a master agreement does not affect the rights and liabilities under any job order existing at the time of cancellation. The contractor must continue to perform all work covered by any job order issued before the effective date of cancellation of the master agreement.
#### Paul Edwards, Also Known as Fred Seidenberg, v. Anna M. Kross, as Commissioner of Correction of the City of New York.

Motion for an order directing respondent to correct jail time and for other relief dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If so advised, the petitioner may apply for such relief to the Supreme Court, Bronx County. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  <ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016104
<NAME> CAGLE'S, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
         <S>
<C>  <PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                            1897
<SECURITIES>                                      1400
<RECEIVABLES>                                    15134
<ALLOWANCES>                                       918
<INVENTORY>                                      34600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 52697
<PP&E>                                          134849
<DEPRECIATION>                                   55564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  165123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29184
<BONDS>                                          44009
<COMMON>                                          4747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       76086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    165123
<SALES>                                          77270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 77270
<CGS>                                            70660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    75656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2599)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3663
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2334
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49


</TABLE>
22.000 Scope of Part. This part— ( a ) Deals with general policies regarding contractor labor relations as they pertain to the acquisition process;
( b ) Prescribes contracting policy and procedures for implementing pertinent labor laws; and
( c ) Prescribes contract clauses with respect to each pertinent labor law.
[82 FR 51530, Nov. 6, 2017]
exv10w17






Ex 10.17




NOTE




October ___, 2008




Rochester, New York




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Vuzix Corporation., a Delaware corporation (the
“Borrower”), DOES HEREBY PROMISE to pay to the order of Paul Travers (the
“Lender”), at its office at 75 Town Centre Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, in lawful money of
the United States and in immediately available funds, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all
Loans made to the Borrower by the Lender hereunder and pursuant to the Agreement, ON DEMAND, and to
pay interest (computed on the basis of a year of 360 days) from the date of this Note on the unpaid
principal amount hereof, in like money, at said office, at a rate per annum equal to twelve percent
(12%) per annum. Interest accrued on this Note shall be paid monthly on the first day of each
month commencing December 1, 2008. The principal balance hereof and interest accrued hereon shall
be due and payable in full on December 31, 2010 even if no demand for payment has been made



     The Borrower hereby authorizes the Lender to endorse on the Schedule annexed to this Note all
Loans made to the Borrower and all payments of principal amounts in respect of such Loans, which
endorsements shall, in the absence of manifest error, be conclusive as to the outstanding principal
amount of all Loans; provided, however, that the failure to make such notation with respect to any
Loan or payment shall not limit or otherwise affect the obligations of the Borrower under the
Agreement or this Note.



     This Note is the Note referred to in a certain Loan Agreement between the Lender and the
Borrower, dated the same date as the date of this Note (the “Agreement”), and capitalized
terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. The Agreement,
among other things, contains provisions for prepayments on account of the principal of this Note
prior to demand upon the terms and conditions specified in the Agreement.



     This Note shall be governed by the laws of New York applicable to contracts made and performed
wholly within such state, without regard to conflict of laws principles.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
Vuzix Corporation


 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  Grant Russell
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Grant Russell 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Operating Officer
#### In the Matter of Julius J. Goldberg, Deceased. Madeleine D. Fort-gang, as Executrix of Julius J. Goldberg, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent; George M. Goldman et al., Respondents; Shirley Goldberg, Cross-Appellant Respondent.

In consolidated proceedings: (a) by Madeleine D. Portgang, testator’s daughter, individually and as coexeeutrix, to revoke letters of coexeeu*803torship and of trusteeship issued to the respondent George M. Goldman; (b) by said coexeeutrix as plaintiff in an action against a certain corporation to recover an indebtedness allegedly due to the estate; and (c) by the said George M. Goldman, as coexecutor, to determine the validity of an election by Shirley Goldberg, the testator’s widow, to take her intestate share of the estate pursuant to statute (Decedent Estate Law, § 18), the daughter and the widow cross-appeal as follows from a resettled decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, entered April 7, 1964 upon the report of a Referee after a nonjury trial before him: (1) The daughter appeals from so much of the decree: (a) as denied her application to remove the respondent Goldman as an executor and trustee of the.estate; (b) as dismissed her complaint in the action against the testator’s alleged corporate debtor; and (c) as made certain allowances to the Referee and to the special guardian for their respective services to the estate. (2) The widow appeals from so much of the decree as adjudged invalid her election to take her intestate share of the estate pursuant to statute (Decedent Estate Law, § 18). On appeal by the daughter, Madeleine D. Fortgang, the resettled decree is modified on the facts by reducing from $1,250 to $500 the allowance to the special guardian for his services to the estate. As so modified, the resettled decree, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact implicit in the decision of the Surrogate, insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith, are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated therein. On appeal by the widow, the resettled decree, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under the circumstances here the allowance to the special guardian was excessive to the extent indicated. (For related appeal, see *Matter of Goldberg,*22 A D 2d 854.) Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, Rodolfo L. Garcia 

and Brandon C. Stroh v. Stephen B. Lee, M.D., P.A., a Texas 

Professional Association, Dean Paul Chauvin, Jr., M.D., P.A., a Texas 

Professional Association, and Michael Nguyen, M.D.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00467-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-12279

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Appellants have filed an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order denying their plea 

in abatement and motion to dismiss the underlying lawsuit in favor of arbitration. They have 

also filed a parallel mandamus proceeding, In re Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, 

PLLC, Rodolfo L. Garcia, and Brandon C. Stroh, 01-14-00463-CV. Appellants filed an 

Emergency Motion to Stay All Trial Court Proceedings Pending Appellate Review of Order 

Denying Arbitration in both this appeal and the mandamus proceeding. We granted the motion 

in the mandamus pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.10.

Appellees have now filed a response to the motion in both this appeal and the mandamus. 

After reviewing the motion to stay and the response, we GRANT the motion to stay filed in this 

appeal; all proceedings in the trial court, including discovery, are STAYED pending further 

order of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 22, 2014
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 20 ) ll-K - (B ) - 8 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:48 AM Sheet 20 of 325P. 2 

# A= © II-K-(B)- 8

MODELINGISSUE S RELATE D T O TH E INDUSTRIAL BOILER S NSPS . Lette r t o R.L . Short , EPA:EAB t o th e Files . Septembe r 20 , 1979 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)- 8