alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Overview | **Guidelines** | Information Correction Requests and Appeals | Contact

----

## Guidelines

- Guidelines
- Information Correction Requests and Appeals 
- Review

The Department will respond to all requests for correction within 120 calendar days of the Branch Chief's receipt of the request, including requests that the Department elects not to process further. For requests that merit review -

- If the request is clear and complete, the Department's response will explain the findings of the review, or will inform the requester if more time is needed to complete the review, the reason(s) for the additional time, and an estimate of the time it will take to respond. The appropriate program office will be responsible for determining what action is necessary and, if an error was made, it will determine the appropriate level of correction.
- If the request is incomplete or unclear, the Branch Chief will seek clarification from the requester. In the case of an unclear or incomplete request, the requester may submit additional clarifying information if he or she so chooses. However, the deadline for the Department's review and response will be based upon the date the clarifying information is received.

Once a decision is made, the response will explain to the requester that he or she has a right to appeal the decision. Copies of all Department correspondence related to Information Quality Requests will be maintained by the Branch Chief.

----

- Previous
- Table of Contents
- Next
Classic Air Aviation, llC 4805 E Falcon Drive, Mesa AZ 85215 Tel: (602) 574-5376 Email : kacie @classica iraviation .com To: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Sent via U.S. Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested August 7, 2015 RE: FAA Case N. 201SWP910053 Classic Air Aviation, LLC Your Honor, ........ ;::::::>._,.,>-c:: C)w"'0\':Y.wa- **~** U>oo ...,,., -,"'0 -:-1 oo rrt-, $.-1 '::::0 ::I:;:> m:z :l> " (J) :::0"'0 **%~**Q '(J)> ......0% Please accept this letter as our response from Classic Air Aviation, LLC to the Complaint letter dated July 7, 2015 and received from Michael Urbano on July 29, 2015 . This letters serves as our notice to deny all allegations as we have not retained proper counsel. Thank you in advance for your attention in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions at 602-574-5376. Kacie M. BuschOperations Manager, Respondent
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5 
<CIK> 0000016104 
<NAME> CAGLE'S, INC. 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998 
<CASH>                                             235 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18581 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       860 
<INVENTORY>                                      28783 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 48240 
<PP&E>                                          103242 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   44425 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  135495 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23914 
<BONDS>                                          40669 
<COMMON>                                          5006 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                                       46073 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    135495 
<SALES>                                          82874 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 82874 
<CGS>                                            73864 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    78151 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1871) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 846 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5748 
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2070 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3678 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      3678 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74 
         

</TABLE>
#### 252.203-7003 Agency Office of the Inspector General.

As prescribed in 203.1004(a), use the following clause:

# Agency Office of the Inspector General (AUG 2019)

The agency office of the Inspector General referenced in paragraphs (c) and (d) of FAR clause 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, is the DoD Office of Inspector General at the following address:

Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, Administrative Investigations, Contractor Disclosure Program, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Suite 14L25, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500.

Toll Free Telephone: 866-429-8011. Website: *https://www.dodig.mil/Programs/Contractor-Disclosure-Program/.*

(End of clause)

[77 FR 76937, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 84 FR 39203, Aug. 9, 2019]
#### 246.401 General.

The requirement for a quality assurance surveillance plan shall be addressed and documented in the contract file for each contract except for those awarded using simplified acquisition procedures. For contracts for services, the contracting officer should prepare a quality assurance surveillance plan to facilitate assessment of contractor performance, see 237.172. For contracts for supplies, the contracting officer should address the need for a quality assurance surveillance plan.

[75 FR 22706, Apr. 30, 2010]
#### Sylvia S. Kletter v. George Kletter et al.

Motion for. resettlement denied. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ..
#### 2452.201-70 Coordination of data collection activities.

As prescribed in 2401.106-70, insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts where the contractor is required to collect identical information from ten or more public respondents:

# Coordination of Data Collection Activities (APR 1984)

If it is established at award or subsequently becomes a contractual requirement to collect identical information from ten or more public respondents, the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) applies. In that event, the Contractor shall not take any action to solicit information from any of the public respondents until notified in writing by the Contracting Officer that the required Office of Management and Budget (OMB) final clearance was received.

(End of clause)

[53 FR 46538, Nov. 17, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 77 FR 73537, Dec. 10, 2012]
#### Daniel Hurley, III, et al., Respondents, v Mary Hurley et al., Defendants, and State of New York, Appellant.

— In an action, *inter alia,*for partition and for an easement of access over certain property, the State of New York appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated March 15, 1978, which denied its motion to dismiss the amended complaint as against it. Order modified, on the law, by adding thereto, immediately after the word "denied”, the following: "except that the motion is granted as to the third, fourth and fifth causes of action and the said causes of action are dismissed.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The State is immune from suit except to the extent that its immunity has been expressly waived *(Benz v New York State Thruway Auth.,*9 NY2d 486; *Easley v New York State Thruway Auth.,*1 NY2d 374). The claims against the State here dismissed arose primarily from the actual act of appropriation of real property for which the State has waived its immunity only in the Court of Claims (see Court of Claims Act, § 9, subd 2). The second cause of action, however, seeks a determination of plaintiffs’ claim to an easement in real property owned by the State. Consequently, the waiver of immunity contained in section 1541 of the Real *698Property Actions and Proceedings Law applies (see *Gifford v Whittemore,*4 AD2d 379). If the plaintiffs are successful in establishing their right to an easement, the State, as owner of the servient estate, will be affected by the ultimate determination of the partition action. Consequently, it should be retained as a party to the first cause of action as well (see Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 904). Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-04056 Document #: 6 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:31
Case: 1:12-cv-04056 Document #: 6 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:32
# C_2017146EN.01000501.xml

| 11.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 May 2017

(2017/C 146/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0888 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4395 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84300 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6698 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0938 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4138 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,672 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2223 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5500 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,9148 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4809 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4921 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4755 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5788 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5362 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 238,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8785 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5201 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4238 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 535,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7330 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,409 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 63,4665 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,852 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4730 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8766 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,3975 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0888

JPY

Japanese yen

124,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4395

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84300

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6698

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0938

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4138

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,672

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2223

RON

Romanian leu

4,5500

TRY

Turkish lira

3,9148

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4809

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4921

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4755

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5788

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5362

KRW

South Korean won

1 238,96

ZAR

South African rand

14,8785

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5201

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4238

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 535,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7330

PHP

Philippine peso

54,409

RUB

Russian rouble

63,4665

THB

Thai baht

37,852

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4730

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8766

INR

Indian rupee

70,3975

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC., 

individually and as the representative of a class of 

similarly-situated persons, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ALLSCRIPTS-MISY’S HEALTHCARE 

SOLUTIONS, INC., ALLSCRIPTS, LLC, 

ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, 

INC., and ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE, LLC 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 12-cv-03233 

Magistrate Judge Cole 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE 

Plaintiff, Physicians Healthsource, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “PHI”), individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1), 26(e), and 

37(c)(1), respectfully requests that the Court enter an order striking the Declarations of 

nondisclosed witnesses, and striking all portions of Allscripts’ Opposition to Class Certification 

that relies on the Declarations. 

In support of this Motion, Plaintiff submits the attached Memorandum of Law. 

Date: July 14, 2016      Respectfully submitted, 

PHYSICIANS HEALTHSOURCE, INC., 

individually and as the representatives of a 

class of similarly-situated persons 

 

s/ Ryan M. Kelly 

 Ryan M. Kelly 

Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:5599
Brian J. Wanca 

Ryan M. Kelly 

ANDERSON + WANCA 

3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500 

Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 

Telephone: 847-368-1500 

George D. Jonson 

Matthew Stubbs

MONTGOMERY, RENNIE & JONSON 

36 East Seventh Street, Suite 2100 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

Telephone: 513-241-4722 

Phillip A. Bock 

BOCK & HATCH, LLC 

134 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1000 

Chicago, IL 60602 

Telephone: 312-658-1500 

Max G. Margulis 

MARGULIS LAW GROUP 

28 Old Belle Monte Road 

Chesterfield, MO 63017 

Telephone: 636-536-7022 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on July 14, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent by e-mail to all parties by 

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. 

/s/ Ryan M. Kelly 

Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:5600
# C_2017178EN.01000101.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2017/C 178/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 168, 29.5.2017.

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.

OJ C 151, 15.5.2017.

OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.

OJ C 129, 24.4.2017.

OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2017035EN.01000102.xml

| 3.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8316 — Advent/Brammer)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 35/02)

On 20 January 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8316. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8316. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### Marine Trust Company of Western New York, Appellant, v. John L. Collins et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Following his examination before trial by defendant a witness before signing the deposition undertook to make certain corrections therein which included substantial changes in his answers given upon the examination. He gave as his reasons, among others, that the corrections had been made “to give an accurate statement thereof and to correct errors by the reporter in the transcription of my testimony”. Special Term dismissed the complaint unless within a stated time the witness subscribed the deposition with leave to note thereon errors claimed to have been made by the reporter in transcription. We believe the applicable rule is enunciated in rule 3116 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules which authorizes a witness before signing the deposition to enter thereon “ any changes in form or substance i: 3 with a statement of the reasons given by the witness for making them”. This has long been the established procedure. *(Skeaney*v. *Silver Beach Realty Corp.,*10 A D 2d 537.) However, the omnibus statement of the witness that corrections were made to correct his errors in testifying or errors of the reporter is improper. The precise procedure was enunciated in *Columbia*v. *Lee*(239 App. Div. 849, 850) as follows: “Before the witness signs and subscribes his testimony he may add to the foot thereof a statement that certain of his answers (indicating the answers to which he refers) are incorrect, giving the reason therefor: either that it is an incorrect transcript or that his present recollection of the facts is more accurate, and he may then state what his corrected answer is and give any other explanation he desires with respect to his prior answer. After adding such a statement he must sign and subscribe his testimony.” This procedure should be followed here. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term granting defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint unless plaintiff’s employee John T. French subscribe his deposition.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, MeClusky, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Radley A. Metzger, Doing Business as Audubon Films, Petitioner, v. Edgar W. Couper et al., Constituting the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

This is an appeal, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, seeking a review of the determination of the Board of Regents. The parts of the motion picture, directed by the Board of Regents to be eliminated as *“*obscene. ”, in our opinion do not constitute an appeal to prurient interest in violation of the statute. *(Matter of Excelsior Pictures Corp.*v. *Regents,*3 N Y 2d 237, 242; *Kingsley Pictures Corp.*v. *Regents,*360 U. S. 684.) Determination annulled, and matter remitted with the direction to license the film, with $50 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
C. A. No. 74-332.

#### State *v.*Ronald E. Sprague.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Aram K. Berberian,*for defendant.

Motion of State to dismiss appeal of defendant is granted.
#### Frank G. Back, Doing Business under the Name of Research & Development Laboratory, Appellant, v. Leonard E. Bergstein, Respondent.

dent. Motion by respondent for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
**Tribal Chair Addresses and Tribal Contacts for OR Aquatic Life Criteria**

**Consultation/Coordination -**  **November 15, 2012** The Honorable Charlotte Rodrique Chair person Burn s Paiute Tribe of the Burns Paiute Indian Colony of Oregon 100 Pasigo Street Burn s, Oregon 97720 **Jason Fenton, Environmental Program**  **Manager** , 541
- 573
- 1375, x5 , jason.fenton@burnspaiute
nsn.gov
The Honorable Mark In gersoll Chairman Confederated Tribes of Coos, L ower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians 1245 Fulton Avenue Coos Bay , Oregon 97420 **Margaret Corvi ,**  **Interim DNR Director**  , 541
- 888
- 7511 , MCorvi@ctclusi.org
The Honorable Brenda Meade Chair person Coquille Indian Tribe 3050 Tremont Street North Bend, Oregon 97459 **Peter Wakeland, NRD Director** , peterwakeland@coquilletribe.org The Honorable Delores Pigsley Chairwoman Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians P.O. Box 549 Siletz, Oregon 97380 **Mike Kennedy, Natural Resource Manager**  , 541
- 444
- 2532 ext.1232 mikek@ctsi.nsn.us
The Honorable Rey

n Leno Chairman Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde 9615 Grand Ronde Road Grand Ronde, Oregon 97347 **Mike Wilson, Natural Resources Director** , mike.wilson@grandronde.org **Michael Karnosh, Ceded Lands Coordinator**  , 503
- 879
- 2383 , michael.karnosh@grandronde.orgThe Honorable Don Gentry

Chairman The Klamath Tribes P.O. Box 436 Chiloquin, Oregon 97624 **Kris Fisc her,**  **Aquatic Program Director** , 541
- 783
- 2149, x22 , kris.fischer@klamathtribes.com The Honorable Gary

Burke Board of Trustees Chairman Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Reservation Nixyaawii Governance Center 46411 Timine Wa y Pendleton, Oregon 97801 **Robin Harris, Director**  **Water Resources**  RobinHarris@ctuir.org Note: Jim Zokan works with Umatilla. The Honorable Eugene Greene, Jr. Chairman Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation P.O. Box C Warm Springs, Oregon 9776 1 **Bobby Brunoe, Director of Natural Resources** , 541
- 553
- 2015 , robert.brunoe@wstribes.org Deepak Sehgal, Manag er, Tribal Environmental Office, 541
- 553
- 2022 , dsehgal@wstribes.org The Honorable Dan Courtney Chairman Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians 2371 NE Stephens Street Roseburg, OR 97470 **Am y Amoroso**  **, Natural Resources Director** , 541
- 677
- 55 75 , aamoroso@cowcreek.com The Honorable Anthony D. Johnson ( expires May 201 6 ) Chair man Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho P.O. Box 305 Lapwai, ID 83540 **James Holt, Director of Water Resources Department**  , jamesh@nezperce.org Ken Clark, Water Quality Coordinator, kenc@nezperce.org The Honorable JoDe L . Goudy C hairman Yakama Nation Tribal Council P.O. Box 151 Toppenish , Washington 98948 **Phil Rigdon, Deputy Director, Yakama Nation Department of Natural Resources** prigdon@ ya kama.com , 509
- 865
- 5121, ext, 4655Paul Ward, Fisheries Program Director , pward@yakamafish
- nsn.gov

Mr. Paul Lumley Kristine Executive Director Columbia River Inter - Tribal Fish Commission 700 NE Multnomah St, Suite 1200 Portland , Oregon 97232 **Dianne Barton, Water Quality Coordinator, bard@critfc.org**  **General Line: (503)238 -**  **0667 Direct Line: (503)731**  **- 1259**
#### 22.804-1 Nonconstruction.

Except as provided in 22.807, each nonconstruction prime contractor and each subcontractor with 50 or more employees and either a contract or subcontract of $50,000 or more, or Government bills of lading that in any 12-month period total, or can reasonably be expected to total, $50,000 or more, is required to develop a written affirmative action program for each of its establishments. Each contractor and subcontractor shall develop its written affirmative action programs within 120 days from the commencement of its first such Government contract, subcontract, or Government bill of lading.

[63 FR 70284, Dec. 18, 1998]
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-78562, 33-64205, 333-17131, 333-45381,
333-76119, 333-33300, 333-54480 and 333-76660) and on Form S-3 (No. 33-61712) of
ELXSI Corporation of our reports dated March 6, 2003 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K.


                /s/ Tedder, James, Worden & Associates, P.A.
                ----------------------------------------------
                Orlando, Florida
                March 6, 2003