alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:12-cv-05135 Document #: 284 Filed: 07/07/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:8210
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

** **

I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of The Cato Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

 

1.  theForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 28, 2012 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Dated:June 8, 2012

|   |                    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | /s/ John P. D. Cato     |
|   | John P. D. Cato         |
|   | Chairman, President and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

----
IIA 

Calendar No. 627 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 63 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Secretary of the Treasury, 

Secretary of Labor, and Secretary of Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘Short-Term, Limited Duration Insurance’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 28, 2018 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. 

TESTER, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. JONES, Mr. CARPER, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, 

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. COONS, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. LEAHY, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. NELSON, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

CASEY, Mr. BOOKER, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. SCHATZ, 

Mr. REED, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. HASSAN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. PETERS, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. KING, Mr. BENNET, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. WARREN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. WARNER, Ms. 

CANTWELL, Ms. SMITH, Mr. UDALL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. SANDERS, 

Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. KAINE, Mr. MANCHIN, 

and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

OCTOBER 9, 2018 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Labor, and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 63 PCS 

Secretary of Health and Human Services relating to 

‘‘Short-Term, Limited Duration Insurance’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Sec4 retary of the Treasury, Secretary of Labor, and Secretary 

5 of Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘Short-Term, 

6 Limited Duration Insurance’’ (83 Fed. Reg. 38212 (Au7 gust 3, 2018)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 627 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 63 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapited Duration Insurance’’. Human Services relating to ‘‘Short-Term, Lim- retary of Labor, and Secretary of Health and submitted by the Secretary of the Treasury, Sec- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

OCTOBER 9, 2018 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 630 

To amend the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 to make 2,500 visas 

available for the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa program, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2017 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. REED, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 to make 

2,500 visas available for the Afghan Special Immigrant 

Visa program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Our Promise 

5 to Our Afghan Allies Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISAS FOR AFGHAN ALLIES. 

7 Section 602(b)(3)(F) of the Afghan Allies Protection 

8 Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended in the matVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:15 Mar 18, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S630.IS S630

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 630 IS

1 ter preceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘8,500’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘11,000’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Impex Credit Corporation, Appellant, v. Elciario Cuevas D., Respondent.

Order entered on February 28, 1962 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits discrimination based on age in programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. The U.S. Department of Education gives financial assistance to schools and colleges. The Age Discrimination regulation describes conduct that violates the Act. The Age Discrimination regulation is enforced by the Office for Civil Rights and is in the Code of Federal Regulations at 34 CFR Part 110.

 The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 does not cover employment discrimination. Complaints of employment discrimination based on age may be filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

The regulations under the Age Discrimination Act, however, allow you to file a claim in Federal court under that law only after (1) 180 days have passed since you file your complaint with OCR and OCR has made no finding, or (2) OCR issues a finding in favor of the recipient. In the latter case, OCR will promptly notify you and remind you of your right to file in court.

The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 prohibits retaliation for filing a complaint with OCR or for advocating for a right protected by the Act.

Links to Age Discrimination Act and its implementing regulations:
              - 42 USC 6101        : Statement of purpose (USCode.house.gov)
              - 34 CFR Part 110  and  Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
#### 252.219-7010 Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants—Partnership Agreement

As prescribed in 219.811-3(2), use the following clause:

# Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(A) Participants—Partnership Agreement (OCT 2019)

(a) Offers are solicited only from small business concerns expressly certified by the Small Business Administration (SBA) for participation in SBA's 8(a) Program and which meet the following criteria at the time of submission of offer:

(1) The Offeror is in conformance with the 8(a) support limitation set forth in its approved business plan.

(2) The Offeror is in conformance with the Business Activity Targets set forth in its approved business plan or any remedial action directed by SBA.

(3) If the competition is to be limited to 8(a) concerns within one or more specific SBA regions or districts, then the offeror's approved business plan is on the file and serviced by ________. *[Contracting Officer completes by inserting the appropriate SBA District and/or Regional Office(s) as identified by SBA.]*

(b) By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that it meets all of the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this clause.

(c) Any award resulting from this solicitation will be made directly by the Contracting Officer to the successful 8(a) offeror selected through the evaluation criteria set forth in this solicitation.

(d)(1) Unless SBA has waived the requirements of paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii) and (d)(2) of this clause in accordance with 13 CFR 121.1204, a small business concern that provides an end item it did not manufacture, process, or produce, shall—

(i) Provide an end item that a small business has manufactured, processed, or produced in the United States or its outlying areas; for kit assemblers, see paragraph (d)(2) of this clause instead;

(ii) Be primarily engaged in the retail or wholesale trade and normally sell the type of item being supplied; and

(iii) Take ownership or possession of the item(s) with its personnel, equipment, or facilities in a manner consistent with industry practice; for example, providing storage, transportation, or delivery.

(2) When the end item being acquired is a kit of supplies, at least 50 percent of the total cost of the components of the kit shall be manufactured, processed, or produced by small businesses in the United States or its outlying areas.

(3) The requirements of paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii) and (d)(2) of this clause do not apply to construction or service contracts.

(e) The ________ *[insert name of SBA's contractor]* will notify the ________ *[insert name of contracting agency]* Contracting Officer in writing immediately upon entering an agreement (either oral or written) to transfer all or part of its stock or other ownership interest to any other party.

(End of clause)

[81 FR 17047, Mar. 25, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 58336, Oct. 31, 2019]
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-17-000034625-MAY-201808:21 AM
AGENDA

Hybrid Coatings – EPA Meeting

Non-Isocyanate Polyurethane Foam 

July 16, 2014

_____________________________________________________________________________________

1. Introductions 

2. EPA explanation of current initiatives/action plans and timing for isocyanates in regards to PU 

coatings and foam

3. HCT presentation on company, HNIPU technology, market penetration, foam development

4. Discussion on next steps for development of HNIPU foam, potential federal program funding 

and green chemistry recognition/award applications
#### In the Matter of Edward Simmons, as Member of the Board of Appeals, Town of West Seneca, Appellant, v. Chester Germaine et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of West Seneca, Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying petitioner’s motion in Proceeding 3 to direct the Town Board of West Seneca to appoint counsel to defend. Proceedings Nos. 1 and 2.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### 229.402 Foreign contracts.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
amendment to Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
James E. Huston, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                          |  |                    
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: September 20, 2012 |  |  |  | By:                                      |  | /s/ James E. Huston
|                         |  |  |  | James E. Huston, Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jennifer Clemente, Respondent, v Carl Bongiorno & Sons, Inc., Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 452]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated June 12, 2006, which denied its motion for leave to renew its prior motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which had been denied in an order of the same court dated January 13, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for leave to renew since *689it failed to contain a reasonable justification as to why the additional facts it offered upon seeking leave to renew were not presented on the original motion *(see*CPLR 2221 [e] [2], [3]; *Walsh v Schmigelski,*35 AD3d 849 [2006]; *Elder v Elder,*21 AD3d 1055 [2005]; *Hart v City of New York,*5 AD3d 438 [2004]; *cf., Lafferty v Eklecco, LLC,*34 AD3d 754 [2006]).

In light of this determination we do not reach the appellant’s remaining contentions. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### Betty J. Vitole, Individually and as a Stockholder of Presto Manufacturing Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Hans H. Haase et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

In a stockholder's derivative action, the defendants Haase, Stern and Presto Manufacturing Co., Inc., appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 9, 1964 upon reargument: (1) as granted plaintiff’s motion for a discovery and inspection, for a pretrial examination of said defendants, and for modification of said defendants’ notice for the pretrial examination of the plaintiff; and (2) as denied their cross motion, pursuant to statute (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], pars. 1, 7), to dismiss the complaint and for summary judgment. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The initial examination of the plain*806tiff as directed by the order shall proceed on 10 days’ written notice or at such time as the parties may mutually fix by written stipulation. The other examinations and the discovery shall thereafter proceed as prescribed in the order. TJghetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2

INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11 (a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it
becomes effective contains an untrue statement of material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring
a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement.

The
Company dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as its independent auditors, effective June 24, 2002. For additional information, see the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated, June 24, 2002. After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
registration statement (File Nos. 33-00346, 33-06609, 33-50692, 33-59937, 333-24139, 333-52139, 333-52990,
333-65338, 333-65336 and 333-65798) (the "Registration Statements") of Andersen's audit report with respect to the Company's consolidated financial statements as of
November 30, 2001 and for each of the three years then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from Andersen. As a result, with respect to transactions in the Company's
securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen
will not have any liability under Section 11 (a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Andersen or any
omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against Andersen under Section 11 (a) of the Securities Act.

---

QuickLinks
**Office of English Learners (OEL) **
English Language Acquisition State Grants – Title III, Part A
National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition

**Office of Multilingual Initiatives (OMI)**The Office of Multilingual Initiatives is responsible for the administration of all the agency multilingual initiatives, the National Professional Development Program, special initiatives to support multilingualism, and the Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program. OMI will also be responsible for its own GPRA requirements and Performance Indicators.

###  

### Funding Updates

US   Department of Education Grants Forecast This document lists programs and competitions which the Department expects to invite applications for new awards and provides actual or estimated deadline dates for the transmittal of applications under these programs.

Federal Register This directory contains documents published in the Federal Register by the U.S.   Department of Education.
#### Leon Moore, an Infant, by Leona Moore, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury and loss of services sustained as -a consequence of ¡the alleged negligence of the defendant Board of Education of the City of New York, the said defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rings County, entered July 31, 1962 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in the infant plaintiff’s favor for $8,500 and in the .plaintiff mother’s favor for $2,000. The action against the City of New York was discontinued during trial. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed .on the law, without costs. The infant plaintiff claims that on March 28, 1958 he struck his head on the bottom of ia steel crossbeam while descending a flight of stairs in the Alexander Hamilton Vocational High School. Alt that time his height was six feet and three inches. He testified that -he wias standing on -the second step from the toottom when he struck his head. From the nose of the tread of the first step to the bottom of the steel crossbeam overhead, the measured distance *920was six feet and five and three-.eighth inches. From the nose of the tread of the second step .to the end of the steel crossbeam nearest .the stairs, the measured distance was seventy-one and five-eighth inches. Hence, if the infant plaintiff had walked normally down the stairs it would have been a physical impossibility for the accident to have occurred *(Hunter*v. *New York, Ontario & Western R. R. Co.,*116 N. Y. 615). The added fact, as testified to by him, that he crouched as he attempted his passageway further eliminated ¡the possibility of his striking his head. Moreover there was no proof of prior accidents on this stairway, except those incidents claimed to have happened to the plaintiff, although the building was constructed in 1904 and since that time there was no change in the construction of its stairways. The use of a stairway without incident over a long period of time negates the possibility .that it was improperly constructed *(Brown*v. *Mutual Life Ins. Co.,*273 App. Div. 817, affd. 298 N. Y. 675). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Babin, JJ., concur.
#### 22.1003-1 General.

This subpart 22.10 applies to all Government contracts, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees, except as exempted in 22.1003-3 and 22.1003-4 of this section, or any subcontract at any tier thereunder. This subpart does not apply to individual contract requirements for services in contracts not having as their principal purpose the furnishing of services. The nomenclature, type, or particular form of contract used by contracting agencies is not determinative of coverage.
To get a **Pell grant**, you must complete the...

- Free Application for Federal Student Aid (**FAFSA**)

Quick information on Pell grants:

- A Federal Pell Grant, unlike a loan, does not have to be repaid.
- The maximum Federal Pell Grant award is $6,895 for the 2022–23 award year (July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023).
- The amount depends on your financial need, costs to attend school, status as a full-time or part-time student, and plans to attend school for a full academic year or less.
- Learn more about  Pell grants .
- To apply,  **complete the FAFSA** .

**CFDA Number:** 84.063**Also Known As:** Pell Grants; formerly called Basic Educational Opportunity Grants (BEOGs)

Program Description

Federal Pell Grants usually are awarded only to undergraduate students who display exceptional financial need and have not earned a bachelor's, graduate, or professional degree. (In some cases, however, a student enrolled in a postbaccalaureate teacher certification program might receive a Federal Pell Grant.) You are not eligible to receive a Federal Pell Grant if you are incarcerated in a federal or state penal institution or are subject to an involuntary civil commitment upon completion of a period of incarceration for a forcible or nonforcible sexual offense.
#### 1645.303-70 Contract clause.

The clause set forth in section 1652.245-70 shall be inserted in all FEHB Program contracts.