alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(October 5, 1964)

#### William Schiavone, an Infant, by John Schiavone, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. John Laviano, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, medical expenses and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from: (a) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 9, 1964, which denied their application for a general preference in trial, with leave to renew upon consent to examination of the infant plaintiff by a court-designated physician; and (b) an order of said court, dated the same day, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew, upon additional papers, the applica*685tion for the preference, such denial again being with leave to renew upon plaintiffs’ compliance with the condition imposed by the said prior order. Defendant has not appeared or filed a brief in opposition to this appeal. The second order denying the motion for leave to renew is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; the motion is granted; and upon such renewed motion the general preference in trial is granted unconditionally. The appeal from the first order denying the original application for the preference is dismissed, without costs as academic. On this record, it is our opinion that the plaintiffs, by uncontradicted and undisputed proof, made a clear prima facie showing of injuries that might properly support a verdict in excess of $10,000. Hence, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the general preference. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### 225.7901 Export-controlled items.

This section implements section 890(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Pub. L. 110-181).
** **

**Exhibit 32**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officerpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with thequarterly report of Cascade Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)                                    The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

(ii)                                 The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ ROBERT C. WARREN, JR.  |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Warren, Jr. |
| *Chief Executive Officer*  |
| December 7, 2007           |
|                       |
| /s/ RICHARD S. ANDERSON    |   |
| Richard S. Anderson        |
| *Chief Financial Officer*  |
| December 7, 2007           |

 

1

----
251.102 Authorization to use Government supply sources. ( e ) When authorizing contractor use of Government supply sources, follow the procedures at PGI 251.102. ( 3 ) ( ii ) The contracting officer may also authorize the contractor to use the DD Form 1155 when requisitioning from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
( f ) The authorizing agency is also responsible for promptly considering requests of the DoD supply source for authority to refuse to honor requisitions from a contractor that is indebted to DoD and has failed to pay proper invoices in a timely manner.
[69 FR 67858, Nov. 22, 2004]
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA No.DA 20-0065 ANIMALS OF MONTANA, INC.,TROY HYDE,

Permit Holder, Plaintiffand Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH,WILDLIFE,AND PARKS

Respondent and Appellee. GRANT OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPELLANT TO FILE OPENING BRIEF Upon consideration ofAppellant's motion for a 30-day extension of time to file the opening brief in the above matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted a 30-day extension of time to and including May 26, 2020 within which to prepare, serve and file its opening brief. DATED this 23rd Day ofApril, 2020.
BOWEN GREENWOOD,CLERK

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPELLANT TO FILE OPENING BRIEF Animals of

MT,Inc., Troy Hyde, PermitHolder v. State of MT,FWP DA 20-0065 Page 1 of 1 04/23/2020 Case Number: DA 20-0065
237.7401 Policy. The authority in 206.302-5(b)(ii) to contract with local governments— ( a ) May be exercised without regard to the provisions of 10 U.S.C. Chapter 146, Contracting for Performance of Civilian Commercial or Industrial Type Functions;
( b ) May not be exercised earlier than 180 days before the date the installation is scheduled to be closed;
( c ) Requires a determination by the head of the contracting activity that the services being acquired under contract with the local government are in the best interests of the Department of Defense.
[59 FR 36089, July 15, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 29500, June 5, 1995; 83 FR 24894, May 30, 2018]
#### 1852.219-18 Notification of competition limited to eligible 8(a) concerns.

As prescribed in 1819.811-3(d), insert the following clause:

# Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Concerns (APR 2015)

(a) Offers are solicited only from small business concerns expressly certified by the Small Business Administration (SBA) for participation in the SBA's 8(a) Program and which meet the following criteria at the time of submission of offer—

(1) The Offeror is in conformance with the 8(a) support limitation set forth in its approved business plan; and

(2) The Offeror is in conformance with the Business Activity Targets set forth in its approved business plan or any remedial action directed by the SBA.

(b) By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that it meets all of the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this clause.

(c) Any award resulting from this solicitation will be made directly by the Contracting Officer to the successful 8(a) offeror selected through the evaluation criteria set forth in this solicitation.

(d)(1) *Agreement.* A small business concern submitting an offer in its own name shall furnish, in performing the contract, only end items manufactured or produced by small business concerns in the United States or its outlying areas. If this procurement is processed under simplified acquisition procedures and the total amount of this contract does not exceed $25,000, a small business concern may furnish the product of any domestic firm. This paragraph does not apply to construction or service contracts.

(2) The ____________[*insert name of SBA's contractor*] will notify the____________[*insert name of contracting agency*] Contracting Officer in writing immediately upon entering an agreement (either oral or written) to transfer all or part of its stock or other ownership interest to any other party.

(End of clause)

[80 FR 12946, Mar. 12, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 50212, Aug. 19, 2015]
#### 225.7018-5 Contract clause.

Unless acquiring items outside the United States for use outside the United States or a nonavailability determination has been made in accordance with 225.7018-4, use the clause at 252.225-7052, Restriction on Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten , in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

[84 FR 18158, Apr. 30, 2019, as amended at 85 FR 61502, Sept. 29, 2020; 88 FR 6584, Jan. 31, 2023]
225.901 Policy. Unless the supplies are entitled to duty-free treatment under a special category in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (*e.g.,* the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act or a Free Trade Agreement), or unless the supplies already have entered into the customs territory of the United States and the contractor already has paid the duty, DoD will issue duty-free entry certificates for— ( 1 ) Qualifying country supplies (end products and components);
( 2 ) Eligible products (end products but not components) under contracts covered by the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement or a Free Trade Agreement; and
( 3 ) Other foreign supplies for which the contractor estimates that duty will exceed $300 per shipment into the customs territory of the United States.
[68 FR 15626, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 1928, Jan. 13, 2004; 70 FR 2363, Jan. 13, 2005; 81 FR 28732, May 10, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,132,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  359,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,739,288
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,468,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,771,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         57
<COMMON>                                       921,825
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,468,293
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,077,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,077,210)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,077,210)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)


</TABLE>
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 36 

Providing for the appointment of Roger W. Ferguson as a citizen regent 

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2017 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. PERDUE, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Roger W. Ferguson as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy of the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Robert P. Kogod of the District of 

8 Columbia on May 5, 2017, is filled by the appointment 

9 of Roger W. Ferguson of the District of Columbia. The 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 36 IS 

1 appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on May 

2 6, 2017, or the date of the enactment of this joint resolu3 tion, whichever occurs later. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
September 14, 2005

Because charter schools are exempt from many State and local education rules, 
  they may be uniquely equipped to serve these students. Accordingly, the Department 
  is prepared to consider requests for statutory and regulatory waivers of various 
  requirements under the CSP and other federal statutes and regulations over which 
  the Secretary of Education exercises administrative authority.

In addition, the Department has identified approximately $20 million of Fiscal 
  Year 2005 funds still available under the CSP, which the Department would like 
  to use to assist States and their charter schools to meet the immediate educational 
  needs of students displaced as a result of Hurricane Katrina.

Enclosed please find guidance on the process for requesting CSP supplemental 
  funds and waivers. Written requests for supplements must be submitted to the 
  Department on or before ***September 23, 2005***, to ensure 
  consideration and allow the Department sufficient time to review the requests 
  and obligate the funds by their expiration date of September 30, 2005.

Thank you for your diligent efforts to assist displaced families and students 
  affected by Hurricane Katrina. If you have any questions please call Nina Rees, 
  Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement, at (202) 205-4500. 
  We look forward to working with you in the days and weeks ahead.
#### 1602.170-3 Comprehensive medical plan.

*Comprehensive Medical Plan* means a plan as defined under 5 U.S.C. 8903(4).
245.602-1 Inventory disposal schedules. For termination inventory, plant clearance officers shall verify inventory schedules, either directly or through appropriate technical personnel, to determine the following: ( a ) *Allocability.* ( 1 ) Review contract requirements, delivery schedules, bills of material, and other pertinent documents to determine whether schedules include property that— ( i ) Is appropriate for use on the contract; or
( ii ) Exceeds the quantity required for completion of the contract, but could be diverted to other commercial work or Government use.
( 2 ) Review the contractor's— ( i ) Recent purchases of similar material;
( ii ) Plans for current and scheduled production;
( iii ) Stock record entries; and
( iv ) Bills of material for similar items.
( b ) *Quantity.* Take measures to provide assurance that available inventory is in accordance with quantities listed on the inventory schedules. Quantities may be verified by actual item count, acceptance of labeled quantities in unopened/sealed packages, scale counts, or other appropriate methods.
( c ) *Condition.* Ensure that the physical condition of the property is reasonably consistent with the Federal Condition Code supplied by the contractor.
#### 233.210 Contracting officer's authority.

See PGI 233.210 for guidance on reviewing a contractor's claim.

[72 FR 6485, Feb. 12, 2007]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic MaterialsCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard A. Santa, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | April 26, 2006 |
|--------|----------------|
|   |           |
|   |           |   |
|   |           | /s/ Richard A. Santa |   |
|   |           | Richard A. Santa |
|   |           | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |           | of Dynamic Materials  Corporation |

 

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DynamicMaterials Corporation and will be retained by Dynamic Materials Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            Section 906 Certification

          I, Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                    PHOTOMEDEX INC.

Dated: March 28, 2003                               By: /s/ Jeffrey F. O'Donnell
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Jeffrey F. O'Donnell
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
226.7202 Policy and procedures. ( a ) ( 1 ) Contracting officers may use this Demonstration Project to award one or more contracts to an eligible contractor for the purpose of providing defense contracting opportunities for entities that employ severely disabled individuals. To determine if there are eligible contractors capable of fulfilling the agency's requirement, conduct market research as described in 210.002 and FAR 10.002. For services, see also PGI 210.070.
( 2 ) If the contracting officer elects to use this Demonstration Project, FAR 6.302-5 requires a written justification and approval to limit competition to eligible contractors. In the justification, identify the statutory authority for the Demonstration Project (10 U.S.C. 3901 note prec.).
( b ) When using this Demonstration Project, one of the evaluation factors shall be the percentage of the offeror's total workforce that consists of severely disabled individuals employed by the offeror. Contracting officers may use a rating method in which a higher percentage of the offeror's total workforce consisting of severely disabled individuals would result in a higher rating for this evaluation factor.
( c ) ( 1 ) Contracts awarded to eligible contractors under this Demonstration Project shall be counted toward DoD's small disadvantaged business goal. The contractor must be an eligible contractor when options under the contract are exercised, in order for DoD to continue to receive credit for the contract toward its small disadvantaged business goal.
( 2 ) Contracting officers shall verify the contractor's representation (*e.g.,* by checking the System for Award Management) prior to exercising an option on a contract awarded under the Demonstration Project. Contracting officers may exercise the option if the contractor has represented that it is not an eligible contractor; however, the contract shall no longer be counted toward DoD's small disadvantaged business goal.
[84 FR 72560, Dec. 31, 2019, as amended at 87 FR 76994, Dec. 16, 2022]
# C_2016453EN.01000601.xml

| 3.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 December 2016

(2016/C 453/09)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0642 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,20 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4398 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84303 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7983 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0751 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9860 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,058 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4892 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5095 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,7747 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4333 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4157 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2534 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4990 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5140 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 247,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9853 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3310 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5445 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 388,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7384 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,858 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,2570 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,907 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6909 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,1158 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,6380 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0642

JPY

Japanese yen

121,20

DKK

Danish krone

7,4398

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84303

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7983

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0751

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9860

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,058

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4892

RON

Romanian leu

4,5095

TRY

Turkish lira

3,7747

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4333

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4157

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2534

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4990

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5140

KRW

South Korean won

1 247,36

ZAR

South African rand

14,9853

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3310

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5445

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 388,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7384

PHP

Philippine peso

52,858

RUB

Russian rouble

68,2570

THB

Thai baht

37,907

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6909

MXN

Mexican peso

22,1158

INR

Indian rupee

72,6380

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
');
	document.write('

The following questions and answers will provide additional guidance about the First in the World (FITW) program, particularly regarding its FY 2015 grant competition.  For questions concerning Development grants, please e-mail OPEFITWdevelopment@ed.gov. For questions concerning Validation grants, please e-mail OPEFITWvalidation@ed.gov..

- First in the World Program Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) FY 2015 Development Competition download filesMS Word (152K)
- First in the World Program Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) FY 2015 Validation Grants Competition 84.116X download filesMS Word (156K)
EXHIBIT A

Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 45-1 Filed: 07/09/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:293
#### In the Matter of Thomas V. Maioli, Appellant, v Board of Cooperative Educational Services, First Supervisory District of Monroe County, Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 853]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered February 14, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the amended petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.