alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2

                        IMPERIAL INVESTMENTS NEVADA, INC.
                              2915 West Charleston

                                    Suite # 7

                               Las Vegas, NV 89102

   Pacific Acquisition Corporation
   2915 West Charleston

   Suite # 7
   Las Vegas, NV 89102

    Re:   Shareholder Agreement with Pacific Acquisition Corporation

   Gentlemen:

In  consideration  of  the  sale  of the  shares  of  Common  Stock  of  Pacific
Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") to the undersigned (the "Holders"),  the
Holders hereby represent, warrants, covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the
Company  and any  holders of record (the  "third  party  beneficiaries")  of the
Company's  outstanding  securities,  including the Company's Common Stock, $.001
par value (the  "Stock")  at the date  hereof and  during the  pendency  of this
letter agreement,  that the Holders will not transfer,  sell,  contract to sell,
devise,  gift, assign,  pledge,  hypothecate,  distribute or grant any option to
purchase or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, its shares of Stock of
the Company owned  beneficially or otherwise by the Holders except in connection
with or following completion of a merger, acquisition or other transaction of or
by the Company  meeting the  definition of a business  combination as defined in
the Company's  registration  statement on Form 10-SB or otherwise complying with
the purposes of the Company as set out in the registration statement.

          Any attempted sale, transfer or other disposition in violation of this
letter agreement shall be null and void.

    The Holder  further  agrees that the Company (i) may  instruct  its transfer
agent not to  transfer  such  securities  (ii) may provide a copy of this letter
agreement to the Company's  transfer  agent for the purpose of  instructing  the
Company's transfer agent to place a legend on the certificate(s)  evidencing the
securities subject hereto and disclosing that any transfer,  sale,  contract for
sale, devise,  gift,  assignment,  pledge or hypothecation of such securities is
subject to the terms of this letter agreement and (iii) may issue  stop-transfer
instructions  to its transfer agent for the period  contemplated  by this letter
agreement for such securities.

    This letter agreement shall be binding upon the Holders, its agents,  heirs,
successors, assigns and beneficiaries.

    Any waiver by the Company of any of the terms and  conditions of this letter
agreement in any instance  shall be in writing and shall be duly executed by the
Company  and the Holder and shall not be deemed or  construed  to be a waiver of
such term or condition for the future, or of any subsequent breach thereof.

          Agreed and accepted this 25th day of March, 2000.

                        THE HOLDER

                                 By: _____________________________
                                      President
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11.

                              CASCADE CORPORATION

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30
                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            2000                                      1999
                           ---------------------------------------   ---------------------------------------
                             INCOME         SHARES       PER SHARE     INCOME         SHARES       PER SHARE
                           (NUMERATOR)   (DENOMINATOR)    AMOUNT     (NUMERATOR)   (DENOMINATOR)    AMOUNT
                           -----------   -------------   ---------   -----------   -------------   ---------
<S>                        <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>           <C>             <C>
Net income...............     $5,171                                    $4,110
Less: preferred stock
  dividend...............         80                                       110
                              ------                                    ------
BASIC EPS
Income available to
  common shareholders....      5,091         11,440        $0.45         4,000         11,534        $0.35
                                                           =====                                     =====
Effect of dilutive
  securities
Manditorily redeemable
  convertible preferred
  stock..................         80            800                         80            800
Exchangeable preferred
  stock..................                                                   30            305
                              ------         ------                     ------         ------
DILUTED EPS
Income available to
  common shareholder plus
  assumed
  conversions............     $5,171         12,240        $0.42        $4,110         12,639        $0.33
                              ======         ======        =====        ======         ======        =====
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer of Terabeam, Inc.,
certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Terabeam, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: March 30, 2006                           /s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert E. Fitzgerald
                                            Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
(CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   $6,698,935
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   $420,923
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      $1,031,900
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      $319,230
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                $824,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $9,295,123
<COMMON>                                    $1,603,444
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       ($793)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         $1,807,987
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              $3,410,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0
<PREFERRED>                                    $59,376
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        $2,800,068
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                            $100,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                 $150,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              $2,775,041
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               $9,295,123
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   $2,550,480
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                          $204,275
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  $1,884,738
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  $2,089,013
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       $665,742
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           ($24,827)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                $436,640
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      $133,415
<NET-INCOME>                                  $303,225
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   ($2,225)
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 $301,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      $221,312
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                     $101,642
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        $689,855
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $2.05


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-K Amendment No. 3 for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the report), I, Xiao Ping Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                               
| | (2) | The   information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   Registrant.

|Dated this   15th day of August, 2006. | By: | /s/Xiao Ping   Zhang                       
|-------------------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------
|                                       |     |                                            
|                                       |     | Xiao Ping   Zhang   Chief Executive Officer
|                                       |     |                                            
|
Publications

Go back to the Table of Contents

We developed a desktop geographic information system (GIS) of Northwest salmonid resources in the Columbia River Basin based on a series of ArcView projects. The system includes data on chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum salmon (O. keta), coho salmon (O. kisutch), pink salmon (O. gorbuscha), sockeye salmon (O. nerka), and steelhead (O. mykiss). Each ArcView project is categorized into salmonid spawning escapement, hatchery releases, and presence/absence tabular data. Salmonid spawning escapement data sets are further divided by observation type (i.e., dam counts, fish per mile, etc.) and linked to spatial data sets (i.e., coverages - digitized geographic files) representing streams and rivers within the Columbia River Basin. Additional coverages (dams, hatchery locations, state boundaries, and land ownership) have been incorporated into each project to provide geographic reference and permit data analysis. This desktop GIS allows scientists and managers to view salmonid population characteristics and geographic features simultaneously over varying spatial scales. The addition of detailed habitat information (e.g., land use, roads/mile, water temperatures) in the future will enable scientists to identify how past and future watershed activities will affect salmonid populations in the Northwest.

Go on to Introduction

Table of Contents
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10476

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Montray Lorenzo Cato, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-194-1

Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Montray Lorenzo Cato directly appeals from a judgment revoking his 

supervised release and sentencing him to 90 days of imprisonment and 30 

months of supervised release. He challenges the constitutionality of 18 

U.S.C. § 3583(g), which mandates revocation of supervised release and a 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 18, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10476 Document: 00516550960 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2022
No. 22-10476

2

term of imprisonment for any offender who violates certain conditions of 

supervised release, including prohibitions on possessing and using a 

controlled substance.

Relying on United States v. Haymond, 139 S. Ct. 2369 (2019), Cato 

contends that § 3583(g) is unconstitutional because it requires revocation of 

a term of supervised release and imposition of a term of imprisonment 

without affording the defendant the constitutionally guaranteed right to a 

jury trial. He concedes that his challenge is foreclosed by United States v. 

Garner, 969 F.3d 550 (5th Cir. 2020), and he raises the issue to preserve it 

for further review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for 

summary affirmance and, alternatively, for an extension of time to file its 

brief.

In Garner, we rejected the argument that Cato has advanced and held 

that § 3583(g) is not unconstitutional under Haymond. See Garner, 969 F.3d 

at 551–53. Thus, Cato’s sole argument on appeal is foreclosed. Accordingly, 

the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its 

alternative motion for extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 

F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). 

Case: 22-10476 Document: 00516550960 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2022
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

BENJAMIN PEREZ and BOBBY MILTON,

Plaintiffs, No. 12 CV 4340

vs. Judge
The CITY OF CHICAGO, Illinois, a municipal
corporation, and Chicago Police Officers KEVIN
NAVARRO, ALEJANDRO CABRAL, GIA CZUBAK,
DEL PEARSON, MICHAEL MALECKI, STEVEN
CARROLL, JEFFREY COLLADO, ROBERT
HERNANDEZ, and JEFFREY FRAHM;

SSS SS SS SS SSS SYS

Defendants.

AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter coming before the Court on the Stipulation of the parties, the parties having reached
agreement to settle this matter, and the respective parties being represented by counsel, Plaintiffs,
Benjamin Perez, and Bobby Milton, by their attorneys, Torreya Hamilton and Thomas P, Needham, and
defendants Kevin Navarro, Alejandro Cabral, Gia Czubak, Del Pearson, Michael Malecki, Steven Carroll,
Jeffrey Collado, Robert Hernandez, and Jeffrey Frahm, and defendant City of Chicago, by its attorney,
Stephen Patton, Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, and the parties having entered into a Release
and Settlement Agreement and Stipulation to Dismiss, the Court being otherwise fully advised in the
premises, hereby incorporates the terms of the Release and Settlement Agreement herein and further
orders as follows:

All of the claims of Plaintiffs, Benjamin Perez, and Bobby Milton, against defendants, City of
Chicago, and Kevin Navarro, Alejandro Cabral, Gia Czubak, Del Pearson, Michael Malecki, Steven
Carroll, Jeffrey Collado, Robert Hernandez, and Jeffrey Frahm, are dismissed with prejudice and with
each side bearing its own costs and attorneys’ fees in accordance with the terms of the Release and
Settlement Agreement. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the limited purpose of enforcing the

settlement agreement, if necessary.

fi nglas al nok ENTER:
Andrea Cook, Assistant Corporation Counsel The Honorable

30 N. LaSalle St., Suite 900 United States District Judge
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(312) 742-7042 DATED:

Attorney No. 6288085


DATE: j-aq-l 3
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 20 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to clarify 

the authority of Congress and the States to regulate corporations, limited 

liability companies, and other corporate entities established by the laws 

of any State, the United States, or any foreign state. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to clarify the authority of Congress and the States 

to regulate corporations, limited liability companies, and 

other corporate entities established by the laws of any 

State, the United States, or any foreign state. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 20 IS 

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

2 States: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The rights enumerated in this Constitu5 tion and other rights retained by the people shall be the 

6 rights of natural persons. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. As used in this Constitution, the terms 

8 ‘people’, ‘person’, and ‘citizen’ shall not include a corpora9 tion, a limited liability company, or any other corporate 

10 entity established by the laws of any State, the United 

11 States, or any foreign state. 

12 ‘‘SECTION 3. A corporate entity described in section 

13 2 shall be subject to such regulation as the people, through 

14 representatives in Congress and State representatives, 

15 may determine reasonable, consistent with the powers of 

16 Congress and the States under this Constitution. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. Nothing in this Constitution shall be 

18 construed to limit the rights enumerated in this Constitu19 tion and other rights retained by the people, which are 

20 unalienable.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
This information is being provided in response to the requests we receive from TRIO professionals inquiring about eligibility requirements for Federal student loan reduction or forgiveness.

Matters concerning student loans and student loan forgiveness are handled by the Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA).  Based on discussion with FSA, the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program may be applicable for TRIO professionals.  It appears that some TRIO employees may qualify for loan reduction or forgiveness.  A copy of the **FSA's fact sheet** on this topic is available at:  **https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/public-service/questions**.

The fact sheet lists the types of loans that may be forgiven under the PSLF Program.  If you have follow-up questions about the PSLF Program regarding the reduction or forgiveness of student loans, please contact your loan service provider.  If your service provider is unable to address this topic, you are encouraged to contact the Federal Student Aid Information Center at Student Loan Ombudsman’s Office at 1-800-4FED AID.

OPE Home | Student Service Home | PSLF Program | PSLF FAQ
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

The undersigned, Patrick J. Callan, Jr., does hereby certify to his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of One
Liberty Properties, Inc. ("the Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



Date: March 16, 2011

/s/ PATRICK J. CALLAN, JR. Patrick J. Callan, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 3.2(h)
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT
OF
RANCHO MANANA, LLC
 Agreement Company Member
 Act
  1. Name .
 2. Member .
 Name
    
    AddressDole Berry Company, LLC
    
    One Dole DriveWestlake Village, CA 91362
 3. Certificates .
 4. Purposes .
 5. Term .




---



##### 



6. Principal Business Office .
 7. Registered Office .
 8. Registered Agent .
 9. Limited Liability .
 10. Admission of Additional Members .
 11. Capital Contribution .
 12. Additional Contributions .
 13. Allocation of Profits and Losses .
 14. Distributions .
 15. Classification for Tax Purposes .
 16. Management .
 2




---



##### 



17. Officers . Officers
 18. Other Business .
 19. Exculpation and Indemnification . Covered Person
 3




---



##### 



20. Assignments .
 21. Resignation .
 22. Dissolution .
 Termination Event
   4




---



##### 



23. Separability of Provisions .
 24. Entire Agreement .
 25. Governing Law .
 26. Amendments .
 27. Sole Benefit of the Member .
 th
 MEMBERDole Berry Company, LLCBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey Conner

Jeffrey ConnerTitle:
    
    Vice President and Secretary
 5