alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(July *7,*1964)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clyde L. Derrick, Appellant.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from an order of the County Court, Broome County, denying relator’s petition for a writ of *coram nobis*without a hearing. By an order of the Broome County Court dated October 28, 1955 a previous motion by relator, seeking the same relief and made on virtually the same grounds, was denied. There was, however, no hearing conducted at that time, and while we find little merit in relator’s contentions, he is properly entitled to a hearing *(People*v. *Picciotti,*4 N Y 2d 340, 344-345; *People*v. *Richetti,*302 N. Y. 290, 296; cf. *People*v. *Mazzella,*13 N Y 2d 997; *People*v. *Sullivan,*4 N Y 2d 472). Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and matter remitted for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
March 3, 1975.

Appeal No. 74-306.

#### Bristol School Department *v.*State of Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights.

*Anthony R. Berretto,*for plaintiff. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Natale L. TJrso,*for Margaret Nunes.

Defendants are hereby ordered to show cause why the appeal in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed for this court’s lack of jurisdiction. *Savings Bank of Newport*v. *Hawksley,*103 R. I. 741, 241 A.2d 806 (1968); *Buffi*v. *Ferri,*106 R. I. 349, 259 A.2d 847; *Clark*v. *Fascio,*106 R. I. 751, 264 A.2d 317 (1970). Defendants have twenty days from the date of this order to submit a memorandum in support of their appeal.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R.
Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                  
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|November 4, 2009
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. DAAA09-02-D-0007 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58661

Thomas Barrett, Esq. David Newsome, Esq.

Counsel E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Carol Matsunaga, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Contract Disputes Resolution Center Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 13 March 2014

# ~Ad= Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58661, Appeal ofKellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### The People of the State of New York Respondent, v Gerald Joseph McConnell, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion to set aside his sentence and for resentencing. We would vacate the sentence and permit defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty but defendant expressly stated on oral argument that he did not seek this relief. (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Court—vacate conviction.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
**EXHIBIT        21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES        OF THE COMPANY**

|  Name                  of Subsidiary             | State of Incorporation |
|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                                  |                        |
| ACR                  Supply, LLC                      | Nevada                           |
| ACR                  Supply, LP                       | Texas                            |
| CAC                  Distributors, Inc.               | Texas                            |
| Contractors                  Heating and Supply, LP   | Texas                            |
| ETI                  Texas, Inc.                      | Tennessee                        |
| Florida                  Cooling Supply, Inc.         | Nevada                           |
| Heating                  and Cooling Supply, LLC      | Nevada                           |
| Lifetime                  Filter, Inc.                | Texas                            |
| Total                  Supply, Inc.                   | Nevada                           |
| Valley                  Supply, Inc.                  | Texas                            |
| West                  Coast HVAC Supply, Inc.         | Nevada                           |
| Westbrook                  GP, LLC                    | Texas                            |
Case: 1:12-cv-05290 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-05290 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-05290 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-05290 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/03/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:4
#### 225.7003 Restrictions on acquisition of specialty metals.
#### Camille Weisner, Respondent-Appellant, v. Sidney Weisner, Appellant-Respondent.

Order entered on March 19, 1963, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, without costs, to strike the second decretal paragraph thereof and in lieu thereof to provide that plaintiff’s application insofar as it seeks temporary alimony for her support and maintenance is denied but that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff at her residence the sum of $300 weekly for support of the children of the marriage; to modify the third decretal paragraph to provide that the counsel fees to be paid to plaintiff shall be the sum of $1,500, to be paid within 10 days after service of copy of the order herein with notice of entry, with privilege to plaintiff to renew applica*516tian to trial court for additional allowance for counsel fees, if the circumstances so warrant; to modify subparagraph 2 of fourth decretal paragraph to provide that defendant may have care and temporary custody of the children for visitation alternatively one week on a Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and the next week on a Sunday from 10:00 A.M. to 5:30 p.m., and also from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday of each week; and said order otherwise unanimously affirmed, without costs. On the record here, there is insufficient showing of a probability of plaintiff’s success in the action; and, in any event, it appears that she is possessed of independent and sufficient means for her support pending the trial of the action. Consequently, an award of temporary alimony is not supported. Under the circumstances, however, the court in its discretion was justified in awarding counsel fees (see *Collins*v. *Collins,*80 N. Y. 1, 8; *Schubert*v. *Schubert,*284 App. Div. 887) but the amount awarded at Special Term was clearly excessive. In view of the tender age of the children of the marriage, Special Term properly awarded custody of the children to the mother pending a trial on the merits of the relevant issues, but in the interests of the welfare of the children, the defendant’s visitation rights should be modified as herein provided. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2453

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2453 appear at 64 FR 46101, Aug. 23, 1999.

#### 2453.217 Special contracting methods.
234.203 Solicitation provisions and contract clause. For cost or incentive contracts valued at $20,000,000 or more, and for other contracts for which EVMS will be applied in accordance with 234.201(1)(iii) and (iv)— ( 1 ) Use the provision at 252.234-7001, Notice of Earned Value Management System, instead of the provisions at FAR 52.234-2, Notice of Earned Value Management System—Pre-Award IBR, and FAR 52.234-3, Notice of Earned Value Management System—Post-Award IBR, in the solicitation; and
( 2 ) Use the clause at 252.234-7002, Earned Value Management System, instead of the clause at FAR 52.234-4, Earned Value Management System, in the solicitation and contract.
#### 252.225-7055 Representation Regarding Business Operations with the Maduro Regime.

As prescribed in 225.7020-5(a), use the following provision:

# Representation Regarding Business Operations With the Maduro Regime (MAY 2022)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this provision—

*Agency or instrumentality of the government of Venezuela, business operations, government of Venezuela,* and *person* have the meaning given in the clause 252.225-7056, Prohibition Regarding Business Operations with the Maduro Regime, of this solicitation.

(b) *Prohibition.* In accordance with section 890 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Pub. L. 116-92), DoD is prohibited from entering into a contract for the procurement of products or services with any person that has business operations with an authority of the government of Venezuela that is not recognized as the legitimate government of Venezuela by the U.S. Government, unless the person has a valid license to operate in Venezuela issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury.

(c) *Representation.* By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that the Offeror is a person that—

(1) Does not have any business operations with an authority of the Maduro regime or the government of Venezuela that is not recognized as the legitimate government of Venezuela by the U.S. Government; or

(2) Has a valid license to operate in Venezuela issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury.

(End of provision)

[87 FR 31961, May 26, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 198 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 198

   Expressing the sense of the Senate that any sweeping health care 
  legislation must be drafted in public under the watchful eye of the 
                      people of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 2017

 Mr. Tester submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Senate that any sweeping health care 
  legislation must be drafted in public under the watchful eye of the 
                      people of the United States.

Whereas the people of the United States deserve and demand that legislation be 
        created through a transparent, bipartisan process to ensure that they 
        can hold their elected representatives accountable;
Whereas the proper functioning of representative democracy requires full 
        transparency in the legislative process;
Whereas it has been widely reported that a group of Senators is working 
        privately in a partisan fashion to craft national health care 
        legislation in the Senate;
Whereas this group is secretly gathering in closed-door meetings that exclude 
        the public and press;
Whereas Senate leadership has refused to commit to holding a single public 
        hearing on this legislation before going directly to the Senate floor 
        for a vote;
Whereas the draft health care legislation under consideration by a secretive 
        group is one of the largest public policy reforms taken up by Congress 
        in generations;
Whereas this legislation will affect the lives of all people in the United 
        States;
Whereas health care constitutes \1/6\ of the gross domestic product of the 
        United States; and
Whereas Congress is elected by the people to serve the people: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the creation of 
any sweeping health care legislation must be done in a transparent, 
bipartisan manner in full view of the people of the United States and 
not behind closed doors.
                                 <all>
```
#### 2416.506 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic NewAction Worksheet with 58 QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7 Date: December 17, 2008 

# Revisio:-l, 1 

# Record ofContacts 

# ~IO-038t.J FDMSDocket

No.FAA'- ------- With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization PerSon Contacted Date Boeing Company Alan Macias 12116109 Boeing Company John Gross I 12116109 ATA 202-626-4125 Mark Lopez t2116109

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify Thai This is the Correct Revision Before Use
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Irene W. Falardeau, Respondent, v. Standard Shade Roller Corp., Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Hamm, J.

The self-insured employer appeals from a unanimous board affirmance of a Referee’s decision awarding compensation to the claimant. The employer contends that the board’s decision was “ an alternative finding”, that the evidence does not support finding either of industrial accident or occupational disease, that it also does not support a finding “that the claimant’s present condition is an aggravation of the preexisting accident” and further contends that the claimant has unreasonably refused to submit to surgery. The board stated: “ On review we find that claimant’s injury was due to the nature of her employment.” On August 20, 1954, the self-insured employer itself initiated the claim, indicating accident on August 6, 1954, and reporting and describing the injury as a “Strain of right biceps muscle—(long head) aggravated by work”; and when, after award, the case was closed on May 26, 1955, it was upon a finding of accident of August 6, 1954, and other appropriate findings with respect to a “ Strain right biceps muscle”. The employer paid the award; there was never an appeal. A “strain” is usually or often an accidental injury. The result of the injury was a “ condition ” and the proof is reasonably consistent with a theory of a work-induced aggravation of that condition and thus, funda*946mentally an aggravation of an accidental injury. The board’s finding might appear to be in the alternative were this a new case but in this reopened case, in which accident was originally established and never questioned, we equate it to a finding of accidental injury resulting in a condition which the work subsequently aggravated. There was substantial evidence of aggravation. As to surgery we think the proof was not such as to require the board to find-that the claimant’s refusal to undergo surgery was unreasonable. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
#### 1422.604 Exemptions.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officers of Cantel Medical Corp. (the “Company”), do hereby certifywith respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission  (the “Form 10-Q”) that,to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.             The Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 10, 2010 |                                                          |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                          |
|                       | /s/  Andrew A. Krakauer                                       |
|                       | Andrew  A. Krakauer                                           |
|                       | President  and Chief Executive Officer                        |
|                       | (Principal  Executive Officer)                                |
|                       |                                                          |
|                       |                                                          |
|                       | /s/  Craig A. Sheldon                                         |
|                       | Craig  A. Sheldon                                             |
|                       | Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                       | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)                 |

 

1

----
#### The Attorney-General *v.*The Continental Life Insurance Company. In Matter of Claim of Benjamin L. Feltwell et al., Appellants.

(Submitted June 29, 1883;

decided October 2, 1883.)

*Cecil Campbell Higgins*for appellants.

*Leslie W.*Russell attorney-general.

*Edward H. Hobbs*for the receiver, respondent.

*647Agree to affirm ; no opinion.

All concur, except Andrews, J., absent. Order affirmed.
# C_2017045EN.01000201.xml

| 11.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8332 — KII/GGC/Infor)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 45/03)

On 6 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8332. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8332. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.17

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of this 26th day of April, 2000, amends an
existing Employment Agreement dated as of April 26, 1997 (the "Agreement"),
between Professional Computer Solutions, Inc., a New York corporation (the
"Company") and Benjamin Tandowski ("Employee").

         The Company and Mr. Tandowski hereby ratify the Agreement in its
entirety, except for the following amendments thereto which are hereby agreed
to:

         1.   Any and all references to "U.S. Office Products Company" in the
Agreement are hereby replaced with "Aztec Technology Partners, Inc.";

         2.   Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
the following provision is inserted in lieu thereof:

              "1.  EMPLOYMENT; TERM. The Company hereby employs the Employee to
perform the duties described herein, and the Employee hereby accepts employment
with the Company for a term of 30 days after the date hereof (the "Term")."; and

         3.   The reference to U.S. Office Products Company and its address set
forth in Section 14 is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is
substituted in lieu thereof:

                                  "Aztec Technology Partners, Inc.
                                  50 Braintree Hill Office Park, Suite 220
                                  Braintree, MA 02184
                                  Attn: T. Kenwood Mullare, Esq."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed as of the date first written above.

                                  PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER
                                  SOLUTIONS, INC.

                                  By: /s/  Ross J. Weintraub
                                     -----------------------
                                  Name:  Ross J. Weintraub
                                  Title: Treasurer

EMPLOYEE:

/s/  Benjamin Tandowski
-----------------------
Benjamin Tandowski