alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Color photo of Anthony Wilder Miller, Deputy SecretaryPrint photo
|-----------------------------------------------------------------

Tony Miller is the deputy secretary and chief operating officer at the U.S. Department of Education. In this role, he manages a broad range of operational, management and program functions.

Prior to joining the Department in 2009, Miller was an operating partner with Silver Lake, a leading private equity firm. From 2003 to 2006, he was with LRN Corporation, a compliance software and eLearning company, where he was executive vice president of operations. Prior to LRN, he worked for 10 years at McKinsey & Company, where he was a partner specializing in growth strategies, operating performance improvement and restructuring for companies throughout the United States, Europe and Asia. Miller began his professional career with Delco Electronics, a subsidiary of GM Hughes Electronics, where he managed regional channel marketing. In addition to his private-sector operating experience, Miller advised the Los Angeles Unified School District from 1997 to 2000, developing student achievement goals and strategies, aligning budgets and operating plans, and designing metrics and processes for overseeing district-wide performance. He undertook similar work with the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District in 2001. Through his service as an ex-officio member of the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education Budget and Finance Committee in 2002–03, he deepened his understanding of state funding and school district budgeting matters.

Tony Miller is a graduate of Purdue University and holds a Master's in Business Administration from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

|Last Modified: 05/03/2011
|-------------------------
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Earl L. Yager, Chief Executive Officer of CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Earl L. YagerEarl L. YagerChief Executive OfficerJune 25, 2004
#### Dorothy Gregory et al., Respondents, v. Brandon Carson et al., Defendants, and George R. Williams et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, defendants Williams and Van Eaton appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, made February 5, 1964 after a pretrial conference and hearing, which granted plaintiffs a preference in trial. Order reversed, without costs, and preference vacated, without prejudice to the right of plaintiffs, if so advised, to move for a preference on proper proof. In our opinion, the record before us fails to disclose fully the facts on which the Justice at the pretrial conference and hearing based the exercise of his discretion in granting the preference. In the absence of a statement of the amount of each defendant’s offer of settlement and a showing of the responsibility of each of the defendants with respect to the accident in issue which involved three vehicles, the propriety of the order cannot be properly reviewed *(Buonanno*v. *Cyr,*19 A D 2d 792). Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
| (1)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 15, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 27, 2011 | /s/ Raymond F. Lancy                                                                   |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President,Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |   |
|                | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                                                |   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Nineva Oglesby

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−05338

Honorable Marvin E. Aspen

SSC Westchester Operating Company, LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, February 4, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Daniel G. Martin: Agreement reached among

the parties. Settlement conference set for 2/5/2013 is stricken. Parties directed to file

stipulated dismissal order within thirty (30) days with the District Judge. All matters

relating to the referral of this action having been concluded, the referral is closed and the

case is returned to the assigned judge. Judge Honorable Daniel G. Martin no longer

referred to the case.Mailed notice(lxs, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-05338 Document #: 20 Filed: 02/04/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:34
#### 252.236-7007 Additive or deductive items.

As prescribed in 236.570(b)(5), use the following provision:

# Additive or Deductive Items (DEC 1991)

(a) The low offeror and the items to be awarded shall be determined as follows—

(1) Prior to the opening of bids, the Government will determine the amount of funds available for the project.

(2) The low offeror shall be the Offeror that—

(i) Is otherwise eligible for award; and

(ii) Offers the lowest aggregate amount for the first or base bid item, plus or minus (in the order stated in the list of priorities in the bid schedule) those additive or deductive items that provide the most features within the funds determined available.

(3) The Contracting Officer shall evaluate all bids on the basis of the same additive or deductive items.

(i) If adding another item from the bid schedule list of priorities would make the award exceed the available funds for all offerors, the Contracting Officer will skip that item and go to the next item from the bid schedule of priorities; and

(ii) Add that next item if an award may be made that includes that item and is within the available funds.

(b) The Contracting Officer will use the list of priorities in the bid schedule only to determine the low offeror. After determining the low offeror, an award may be made on any combination of items if—

(1) It is in the best interest of the Government;

(2) Funds are available at the time of award; and

(3) The low offeror's price for the combination to be awarded is less than the price offered by any other responsive, responsible offeror.

(c) *Example.* The amount available is $100,000. Offeror A's base bid and four additives (in the order stated in the list of priorities in the bid Schedule) are $85,000, $10,000, $8,000, $6,000, and $4,000. Offeror B's base bid and four additives are $80,000, $16,000, $9,000, $7,000, and $4,000. Offeror A is the low offeror. The aggregate amount of offeror A's bid for purposes of award would be $99,000, which includes a base bid plus the first and fourth additives. The second and third additives were skipped because each of them would cause the aggregate bid to exceed $100,000.

(End of provision)
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Charles W. Fischer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 7, 2004                          /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                           ----------------------
                                           Charles W. Fischer
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE BY AND BETWEEN
                        JORANDCOR, INC. ("LANDLORD") AND
                 CODA MUSIC TECHNOLOGY, INC. F/N/A VIVACE, INC.,
                     SUCCESSOR TO CODA COMPANY, ("TENANT"),
                             DATED OCTOBER 23, 1992


         THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE is made as of the 22nd day of March,
2000.

         Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated
October 23, 1992, as amended by that First Amendment To Lease dated May 26,
1993, and as amended by that certain Second Amendment to Lease dated June 30,
1997, for certain property located in the City of Eden Prairie ("Lease").

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the term of the Lease to March 31,
2002;

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to set forth the base rent to be paid by the
Tenant to the Landlord from December 1, 2000 to March 31, 2002, and to reaffirm
all other terms and conditions of the Lease;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements
herein contained, the Lease is hereby amended as follows:

         1. The Termination Date as defined in the Lease shall be March 31,
2002.

         2. The monthly base rent to be paid by Tenant to Landlord pursuant to
the terms of the Lease from December 1, 2000 to March 31, 2002 shall be Seven
Thousand Five and 24/100 Dollars ($7,005.24) per month.

         3. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment to Lease, all the
other terms and conditions of the Lease, and any prior amendments thereto, are
hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have placed their hands the date
and year first above written.

LANDLORD:                                   TENANT:

JORANDCOR, INC.                             CODA MUSIC TECHNOLOGY, INC.



By: /s/ Richard A. Burns                    By: /s/ John W. Paulson
    Its:  President                             Its:  CEO
#### 225.7004 Restrictions on the procurement of goods other than U.S. goods.

[89 FR 46813, May 30, 2024]
The activities and services OSEP provides and supports are the direct result of the hard work and dedication of our staff.
      - OSEP Organizational Chart
      - Staff Directory
      - State Leads for IDEA Part B and Part C

### OSEP Navigation

About OSEP | People and OfficesPrograms and Projects | Grants and FundingLegislation and Policy | Publications and ProductsResearch and Statistics | National Studies | MonitoringContact and Feedback
<TABLE> <S> <C>





















<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRST
QUARTER REPORT ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,765
<SECURITIES>                                       150
<RECEIVABLES>                                      335
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                      1,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,270
<PP&E>                                             863
<DEPRECIATION>                                     671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,128
<OTHER-SE>                                         281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,969
<SALES>                                            951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   935
<CGS>                                              669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (   32)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (   33)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (   33)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (   33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (  .01)
        

</TABLE>
22.1501 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Forced or indentured child labor* means all work or service— ( 1 ) Exacted from any person under the age of 18 under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily; or
( 2 ) Performed by any person under the age of 18 pursuant to a contract the enforcement of which can be accomplished by process or penalties.
*List of Products Requiring Contractor Certification as to Forced or Indentured Child Labor* means the list published by the Department of Labor in accordance with Executive Order 13126 of June 12, 1999, Prohibition of Acquisition of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor. The list identifies products, by their country of origin, that the Departments of Labor, Treasury, and State have a reasonable basis to believe might have been mined, produced, or manufactured by forced or indentured child labor.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR**

 

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sun Bancorp, Inc.(the “Company”), for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wilmer D. Leinbach,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of and for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/ Wilmer D. Leinbach                 |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Exec. VP & Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:  | 3/11/04                                |   |   |
|        |                                        |        |  |  |

 

----
#### Ida Marco, as Ancillary Administratrix, Appellant, v. Walter E. Sachs et al., Respondents, and Blue Ridge Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion by three defendants, Sachs, Weinberg and Catehings, to dismiss the pending appeals herein by plaintiff Ida Marco, by William Marco and by defendants Blue Ridge Corporation and Ridge Realization Corporation, denied on condition that the appeals be perfected and argued or submitted at the December Term, beginning November 28, 1960. The appeals are ordered on the calendar for said term. Appellants’ briefs are directed to be filed and served on or before November 9, 1960. On the court’s own motion, leave is granted to dispense with the printing of the papers and exhibits enumerated in the stipulation of the parties, dated October 12, 1960; the originals or copies of such papers and exhibits to be submitted on the argument. Motion by appellant William Marco and by plaintiff-appellant Ida Marco, as ancillary administratrix, etc., to substitute said William Marco, as administrator, etc., in her place as the appellant in the pending appeals; and for other relief. Motion granted to the extent of substituting William Marco, administrator, etc., in place of Ida Marco, ancillary administratrix, etc., as the appellant in the pending appeals, and amending the title of the action accordingly, on the following condition: that, within five days after the entry of the order hereon, said William Marco shall file an undertaking for $1,000, with corporate surety, to pay all costs and disbursements which may be awarded against him on the pending appeals. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-15-00080-CV

In the Interest of K.N.M.M., a Child

v.

(No. DCPS-14-7079 IN 100TH DISTRICT COURT OF DONLEY COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Indigent

Statewide efiling fee

Filing

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing

Statewide efiling fee

$10.00

$25.00

$20.00

$100.00

$50.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

$20.00

EXEMPT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

Martha Garcia

none

none

none

none

Earl Griffin

Earl Griffin

Earl Griffin

Earl Griffin

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on September 23, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
25.702-1 Definitions. As used in this section— *Appropriate Congressional committees* means— ( 1 ) The Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, The Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
( 2 ) The Committee on Financial Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
*Business operations* means engaging in commerce in any form, including by acquiring, developing, maintaining, owning, selling, possessing, leasing, or operating equipment, facilities, personnel, products, services, personal property, real property, or any other apparatus of business or commerce.
*Marginalized populations of Sudan* means— ( 1 ) Adversely affected groups in regions authorized to receive assistance under section 8(c) of the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act (Pub. L. 109-344) (50 U.S.C. 1701 note); and
( 2 ) Marginalized areas in Northern Sudan described in section 4(9) of such Act.
*Restricted business operations* — ( 1 ) Means, except as provided in paragraph (2) of this definition, business operations in Sudan that include power production activities, mineral extraction activities, oil-related activities, or the production of military equipment, as those terms are defined in the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-174).
( 2 ) Does not include business operations that the person (as that term is defined in Section 2 of the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007) conducting the business can demonstrate— ( i ) Are conducted under contract directly and exclusively with the regional government of southern Sudan;
( ii ) Are conducted pursuant to specific authorization from the Office of Foreign Assets Control in the Department of the Treasury, or are expressly exempted under Federal law from the requirement to be conducted under such authorization;
( iii ) Consist of providing goods or services to marginalized populations of Sudan;
( iv ) Consist of providing goods or services to an internationally recognized peacekeeping force or humanitarian organization;
( v ) Consist of providing goods or services that are used only to promote health or education; or
( vi ) Have been voluntarily suspended.
[64 FR 72419, Dec. 27, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 40465, Aug. 11, 2009]
#### 2152.216-71 Fixed price with limited cost redetermination—service charge.

As prescribed in 2116.270-1(b), insert the following clause when a service charge is negotiated:

# Fixed Price With Limited Cost Redetermination Plus Fixed Fee Contract—Service Charge (OCT 2005)

(a) This is a fixed price with limited cost redetermination plus fixed fee contract, with the fixed fee in the form of a service charge. OPM will pay the Contractor the service charge as specified in a letter from the Contracting Officer.

(b) At the Contractor's request, OPM will furnish, during the third quarter of the current contract year, an accounting of the funds in the Employees' Life Insurance Fund as of the end of the second quarter of the contract year.

(End of clause)

[70 FR 41155, July 18, 2005]