alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12



Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries



Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



|                                                                                    |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |      |     |      |   |     |  |   |    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --- | ---- | - | ---- |  | ---- | --- | ---- | - | --- |  | - | ---
|                                                                                    |  | Years Ended December 31,
|(Dollars in millions)                                                               |  | 2007                     |     | 2006 |   | 2005 |  | 2004 |     | 2003
|Earnings:                                                                           |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |      |     |      |   |     |  |   |    
|Income from continuing operations before provision for income tax                   |  | $                        | 234 |      | $ | 291  |  | $    | 232 |      | $ | 183 |  | $ | 91 
|Fixed charges                                                                       |  |                          | 297 |      |   | 353  |  |      | 359 |      |   | 350 |  |   | 358
|Income from continuing operations before provision for income tax and fixed charges |  | $                        | 531 |      | $ | 644  |  | $    | 591 |      | $ | 533 |  | $ | 449
|                                                                                   
|Fixed charges:                                                                      |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |      |     |      |   |     |  |   |    
|Interest expense                                                                    |  | $                        | 297 |      | $ | 353  |  | $    | 359 |      | $ | 350 |  | $ | 358
|                                                                                   
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                  |  |                          | 1.8 |      |   | 1.8  |  |      | 1.6 |      |   | 1.5 |  |   | 1.3
|                                                                                   



41
## IDEA Formula Grants

OSEP administers three formula grant programs authorized by Part B and Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). These formula grants are awarded to states annually to support early-intervention services for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families, preschool children ages three through five, and special education for children and youth with disabilities.

Read more about OSEP's Formula Grant Programs.

----

## IDEA Discretionary Grants

OSEP, through Part B and Part D of IDEA, provides discretionary grants to institutions of higher education and other non-profit organizations to support research, demonstrations, and technology, personnel development. Discretionary grants are also available to some for-profit organizations. Discretionary grants are grants awarded through a competitive process. 

Read more about OSEP's Discretionary Grant Programs.

**New OSEP Funding Opportunities!**

### ED Discretionary Grants Resources

The Department of Education hosts a number of online resources for ED grant applicants:
      - Discretionary Grant Application Packages
      - Grant Application Forms and Other Forms
      - Grants Forecast
      -  ED's Funding Overview

----

## Special Education Research Grants

IDEA authorized the establishment of the National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER), along with the transfer of responsibilities for research in special education to the new center. The center is located within the Department's Education's Institute for Education Services. Information on current NCSER grant competitions can be found at the IES Funding page. 

----

## IDEA Funding

The Department of Education's State Allocation Tables by program and by state show recent and estimated allocations under formula-allocated and selected students aid programs. 

The Department of Education's Budget News Page provides the latest information about Congressional activities on the Department's appropriations. 

----

### OSEP Navigation

About OSEP | What's New in OSEP | People and OfficesPrograms and Projects | Grants and FundingLegislation and Policy | Publications and ProductsResearch and Statistics | National Studies | MonitoringContact and Feedback
#### 2419.803 Selecting acquisitions for the 8(a) Program.
Appeal No. 73-199.

#### In re Estate of Howard E. Taylor.

*Moses Kando, James Cardono,*for appellants. *Anthony T. Jackvony,*for appellees.

Matter assigned to the calendar for the first Monday in February, 1975 for oral argument on the show cause order entered November 7, 1974.

Paolino, J. not participating.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: ZIMMER NEXGEN KNEE
IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

MDL No. 2272

Master Docket Case No. 11 C 05468

Plaintiff, See Attached List of Cases

ZIMMER, INC.., et al,

Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

ORDER

The cases on the attached list are dismissed without prejudice. Any pending motions are
stricken.

ENTER:

Date: September 15, 2014 (Rltuw = Thue Ls ee
REBECCA R. BALLMEYER/
United States District Judg



Cases dismissed without prejudice.

Plaintiff

Beuerlein, et al v. Zimmer, et al
Brown v. Zimmer, et al
Conzet v. Zimmer, et al
Deavours v. Zimmer, et al
Douglass v. Zimmer, et al
Grolley, et al v. Zimmer, et al
Iannone v. Zimmer, et al
Kopec v. Zimmer, et al
Maize v. Zimmer, et al
Paczkowski v. Zimmer, et al
Ramsey v. Zimmer, et al
Reaves v. Zimmer, et al
Robbins v. Zimmer, et al
Sexton v. Zimmer, et al
Treisch v. Zimmer, et al
VanArsdale v. Zimmer, et al
Vazquez v. Zimmer, et al
Watters v. Zimmer, et al

Case No.

12 C 05784
12 C 07895
13 C 01042
12 C 02042
12 C 07456
12 C 00328
12 C 08919
12 C 08921
12 C 06511
12 C 01040
13 C 01040
12 C 05793
13 C 00572
12 C 05785
13 C 03148
13 C 00552
12 C 03830
13 C 03140
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-2-1998
<CASH>                                           3,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,439
<INVENTORY>                                     99,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,442
<PP&E>                                         429,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                 253,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,430
<BONDS>                                         17,905
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,476
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   397,059
<SALES>                                        313,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               313,414
<CGS>                                          248,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  303,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    77
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,515)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,824)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.42)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Baylor, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Camco Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of Camco as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. Camco’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and15d 15(f))for Camco and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Camco, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of Camco’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluations; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in Camco’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Camco’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Camco’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.5. Camco’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Camco’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Camco’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: May 4, 2007By:  /s/ Richard C. Baylor    Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts
Bottom Photography Title             PageList of             FiguresConversion             FactorsAbstractIntroductionSettingMethodsBathymetrySidescan             Sonar Seismic             Profiles SedimentsBottom             Photography Data             CatalogSummaryAcknowledgmentsReferences             Cited Contacts
Click on figure for larger         image.
Figure 15. Locations of stations at which             bottom samples and photographs were taken during cruise 08012 of             research vessel Rafael to verify acoustic data.         
A total of 160 still photographs of the sea floor were obtained at 37       locations as part of this study (fig. 15). The small SEABOSS system was used to obtain       3–6 still photographs at each station as the RV Rafael drifted       over the seabed for 2–5 minutes. The width of the field of view of each       image is approximately 50 cm (from the small SEABOSS 50 cm above the       bottom). 

Low-resolution images (150 pixels wide) of the photographs may be       viewed by browsing the thumbnails in the photo gallery below. These       thumbnails are hyperlinked to medium-resolution images (600 pixels wide)       for more detailed viewing. Alternatively, the directory containing the       full-resolution images may be accessed by clicking here.       These full-resolution images can be identified by the .jpg image names in       the galleries below. Textural analyses of samples obtained at these       stations, where available, are provided in the Sediments section of this report. 

Photo Galleries 

Stations 1-20

Stations 21-37

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/photo.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Wednesday, 21-Apr-2010 12:11:20 EDT
### This page is under construction, please continue to visit for updates.
#### 219.7100 Scope.

This subpart implements the DoD Mentor-Protégé Program (referred to as the Program) authorized under 10 U.S.C. 4902. The purpose of the Program is to provide incentives for DoD contractors to assist protégé firms in enhancing their capabilities and to increase participation of such firms in Government and commercial contracts.

[89 FR 20876, Mar. 26, 2024]
#### In the Matter of Anthony Riccotta, Respondent, v. Louis J. Lefkowitz, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Albany County Special Term entered on the 10th day of December, 1962. Until the Attorney-General files with the Comptroller a satisfactory abstract of title and a certificate of search as to incumbrances in pursuance to subdivision 6 of section 20 of the Court of Claims Act the Comptroller is not required by law to pay a judgment of the Court of Claims based on an appropriation of land. No such papers have been filed but the court at Special Term has directed the payment by the Comptroller without the filing of those papers by the Attorney-General. In effect the Attorney-General argues that this routine filing should not presently be directed because of the pendency of other litigation not concerned with the record title. We see no good ground on this record to delay the filing of the abstract of title and search. Order modified on the law and the facts to suspend the direction to the Comptroller to pay the judgment to the petitioner until the Attorney-General shall have filed the instruments required by subdivision 6 of section 20 of the Court of Claims Act and the proceeding is remitted to Special Term for such directions to the Attorney-General in respect thereto as may be required by the record. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
2436.602-4 Selection authority. ( a ) The final selection decision shall be made by the cognizant Primary Organization Head in headquarters, or field program office head.
[65 FR 3577, Jan. 21, 2000]
OCR has concluded a compliance review in the New London (CT) Public Schools, examining its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with regard to English language learner (ELL) students.  The purpose of the review was to assess whether the district provides ELLs services necessary to enable them to participate meaningfully in the district’s education program, whether the  district effectively communicates with parents who are not fully proficient in  English, and whether the district properly evaluates and provides special education services to ELL students.  New London Public Schools has voluntarily entered into a resolution agreement that  provides that the district will: change its procedures to ensure that it identifies all ELL students who need services; develop guidelines to ensure that all ELL students receive instruction designed to address their individual needs; ensure that all staff who teach ELL students have appropriate certifications and receive specific training; develop a plan to monitor ELL students who have been exited from services to ensure that they are meaningfully  participating in the general education program; enhance opportunities and support for ELL students to participate in gifted and talented and Advanced Placement courses; create a plan for providing language assistance to parents and  guardians and to ensure that all important notices and documents are made  available to parents in a language that they can understand; and revise its policies to ensure that ELL students are properly assessed for disabilities and provided appropriate services.

***Read the Resolution LetterPDF**(371K)**|******Read the Resolution AgreementPDF** (255K)*****

  

Top
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts
BathymetryTitle             PageList of             FiguresConversion             FactorsAbstractIntroductionSettingMethodsBathymetrySidescan             Sonar Seismic             Profiles SedimentsBottom             Photography Data             CatalogSummaryAcknowledgmentsReferences             Cited Contacts
Click on figures for larger           images.
Figure 18. Reconnaissance single-beam and             multibeam bathymetry collected during National Oceanic and             Atmospheric Administration survey H11346.Figure 19. Digital terrain model of the sea             floor produced from the single-beam and multibeam bathymetry             collected during National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration             survey H11346 and gridded to 25 m.
The original bathymetric dataset produced during NOAA survey H11346 is       composed largely of single-beam echosounder data supplemented by smaller       areas of multibeam coverage (fig. 18). Imagery produced from this reconnaissance       dataset included large areas of no data because single-beam echosounders       only record depth directly beneath the ship's track. Therefore, these data       were regridded to 25 m to provide a more continuous perspective of the       topography and benthic character of the sea floor (fig. 19). This perspective can be displayed as grids and       images that facilitate interpretation of features and processes of smaller       scale than those in the original dataset.

Surveyed depths within the study area range from less than 4 m to       almost 20 m. The shallowest areas are along the shorelines and on the       elongate bathymetric high that extends northeastward from Middle Flats       toward the central part of the study area. This elongate bathymetric high       is flanked by depressions. To the southeast, an elongate depression       connects Edgartown Harbor with the deepest part of the study area       north-northwest of Cape Poge. Depths in Edgartown Harbor average       approximately 10.5 m. To the northwest of the elongate bathymetric high,       several shallower (8.5–9.5 m) depressions are connected by a faint       dentritic or branching pattern. The morphology of both systems suggests       that they are the products of drainage patterns that predate the Holocene       marine transgression.

Most gradients are relatively gentle except in constricted areas, such       as between the elongate bathymetric high in the center of the study area       and Cape Poge. There, tidal currents maintain steeper slopes.   

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/bathy.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:31:34 EDT
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Chad Therapeutics, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-93734) on Form S-8 of Chad Therapeutics, Inc. of our report dated May 5,
2000, relating to the balance sheets of Chad Therapeutics, Inc. as of March 31,
2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31,
2000, which report appears in the March 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of
Chad Therapeutics, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
June 20, 2000
**§682.211   Forbearance.**

* * * * 

 (i) *Mandatory administrative forbearance.*

* * * * 

(7)  The lender shall grant a mandatory administrative forbearance to a borrower after the lender receives reliable information indicating that the borrower sought relief available under §685.212(k) until the lender is notified of a determination.

**§682.410   Fiscal, administrative, and enforcement requirements.**

* * * * 

(b) *Administrative requirements*—(1) *Independent audits.* The guaranty agency shall arrange for an independent financial and compliance audit of the agency's FFEL program as follows:

* * * * 

(6) *Collection efforts on defaulted loans.*

* * * * 

(viii)  The lender shall grant a mandatory administrative forbearance to a borrower after the lender receives reliable information indicating that the borrower sought relief available under §685.212(k) until the lender is notified of a determination.
1845.503-70 Delegations of property administration and plant clearance. ( e ) Under the clause at 1852.245-71, Installation-Accountable Government Property, property is managed by center logistics functions using NASA internal policy and procedural guidance, except— ( 1 ) When contractors are provided or are allowed the use of property that is not governed by that procedural guidance, management of that property is governed by the applicable FAR clause.
( 2 ) When the contractor is responsible for performance of any segment of a property system under a FAR property clause, then property administration and plant clearance are required.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 5, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, K. Scott Gray, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                                              
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 11, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ K. Scott Gray                                                                            
|                    |  |     |  | K. Scott Gray                                                                                
|                    |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
the Companys Principal Accounting Officer