alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
22.406-1 Policy. ( a ) *General.* Contracting agencies are responsible for ensuring the full and impartial enforcement of labor standards in the administration of construction contracts. Contracting agencies shall maintain an effective program that shall include— ( 1 ) Ensuring that contractors and subcontractors are informed, before commencement of work, of their obligations under the labor standards clauses of the contract;
( 2 ) Adequate payroll reviews, on-site inspections, and employee interviews to determine compliance by the contractor and subcontractors, and prompt initiation of corrective action when required;
( 3 ) Prompt investigation and disposition of complaints; and
( 4 ) Prompt submission of all reports required by this subpart.
( b ) *Preconstruction letters and conferences.* Before construction begins, the contracting officer shall inform the contractor of the labor standards clauses and wage determination requirements of the contract and of the contractor's and any subcontractor's responsibilities under the contract. Unless it is clear that the contractor is fully aware of the requirements, the contracting officer shall issue an explanatory letter and/or arrange a conference with the contractor promptly after award of the contract.
241.103 Statutory and delegated authority. ( 1 ) The contracting officer may enter into a utility service contract related to the conveyance of a utility system for a period not to exceed 50 years (10 U.S.C. 2688(d)(2)).
( 2 ) The contracting officer may enter into an energy savings contract under 10 U.S.C. 2913 for a period not to exceed 25 years.
( 3 ) See 217.174 for authority to enter into multiyear contracts for electricity from renewable energy sources.
( 4 ) See PGI 241.103 for statutory authorities and maximum contract periods for utility and energy contracts.
[71 FR 3417, Jan. 23, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 52896, Oct. 15, 2009; 75 FR 34943, June 21, 2010; 76 FR 58155, Sept. 20, 2011; 81 FR 28734, May 10, 2016]
#### 2452.216-81 Level of effort and fee payment.

As prescribed in 2416.506-70(f), insert the following clause in all level-of-effort term contracts:

### LEVEL OF EFFORT AND FEE PAYMENT (APR 2019)

(a) The total level of effort to be provided under this contract is ______hours. The Contractor shall be reimbursed for the actual labor costs incurred.

(b) The contractor shall be paid the fixed fee specified in B.____, Estimated Cost and Fixed Fee, herein, on a prorated basis in proportion to the percentage of the level of effort (LOE) performed at the time of billing in accordance with the following formula:

(Number of acceptable hours delivered) divided by (Total hours in level of effort) × (Total fixed fee) = Fee payment

(*e.g.,* 1,000 hours delivered/10,000 hours (LOE) × $15,000 = $1,500)

(c) In no event shall the amount of fee paid under the contract exceed the total fixed fee specified in B.[ ], Estimated Cost and Fixed Fee, herein.

(End of clause)

[84 FR 15130, Apr. 15, 2019]
225.802 Procedures. ( b ) Information on memoranda of understanding and other international agreements is available at PGI 225.802(b).
[70 FR 73154, Dec. 9, 2005]
Full Document PDF (9.14M)

Message From the Secretary PDF (260K)

**Management's Discussion  and Analysis**PDF (2.6M)

- About the Management's Discussion and Analysis/About the Department/The Department in FY21    PDF  (210K)
- The Department’s Approach to Performance    PDF  (300K)
- Financial Highlights    PDF  (1M)
- Secretary’s Statement of Assurance/Analysis of  Systems, Controls, and Legal Compliance    PDF  (300K)
- Forward-Looking Information    PDF  (257K)

**Financial Section**PDF (3M)

- Message from CFO    PDF  (496K)
- About the Financial Section    PDF  (303K)
- Financial Statements    PDF  (264K)
- Notes to Financial Statements    PDF  (536K)
- Required Supplementary Information    PDF  (281K)
- Report of the Independent Auditors    PDF  (810K)

**Other Information**PDF (2.94M)

- Office of the Inspector General’s Management and  Performance Challenges for Fiscal Year 2021    PDF  (635K)
- Summary of Financial Statement Audit and Management Assurances    PDF  (301K)
- Payment Integrity Information Act Reporting    PDF  (278K)
- Civil Monetary Penalty Adjustment for Inflation    PDF  (270K)
- GONE Act of 2016 and Education's Grant Closeout Process    PDF  (270K)

**Appendices**PDF (2.73M)

| Properties: | Title: U.S. Department of Education FY 2021  Agency Financial Report          |
|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        | Author:  U.S.  Department of Education, Office of the Chief Financial Officer |
**Exhibit32.2**

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002

I,Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

(1)                                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedJanuary 26, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or780(d)); and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:March 12, 2007
|        | /s/     Raymond F. Lancy |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer         |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer)                     |

 

----
#### Mary Rafal, Appellant, v. Andrew Rafal, Respondent.

Motion to appeal on nonprinted papers denied and motion to dismiss appeal from order dated January 21, 1960 referring appellant’s application to the Justice who presided at the trial granted, without costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Rucker, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: We find no merit in appellant’s contention that reversible error was committed by the trial court when it granted a request of defendant’s trial counsel to dictate an exception to the court stenographer outside the court’s presence. There had been ample opportunity to take the exception in open court but the attorney waited 15 minutes after the Judge had left the courtroom before making his request. Defendant’s attorney created the situation of which defendant now complains. We do not consider *People*v. *Parisi*(276 N. Y. 97) where a judgment was reversed because the Judge left the courtroom while the defendant’s attorney was taking exceptions, an authority requiring reversal in this ease. All concur, except Williams, P. J., and Noonan, J., who dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial, in the following memorandum: The judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial ordered. During the course of the jurors’ deliberations they requested further instructions. Shortly after these instructions had been given and deliberations resumed the attorney for the defendant sought and was granted permission by the court to place certain exceptions on the record. These exceptions were given to the court reporter but were not heard by the Judge nor was he aware of their nature. One of the purposes of an exception is to give an opportunity to modify rulings *(People*v. *Parisi,*276 N. Y. 97, 100). In that case the court also said “Moreover, since the judge is a most important part of a court, it is his duty to be present throughout all proceedings relating to the trial.” Without question exceptions to a court’s instructions are a most important part of the trial proceedings. The absence of the court when these exceptions were noted constituted error which may not be disregarded under section 542 of the Code *754of Criminal Procedure. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of violation of subdivision 1 of section 1751 of the Penal Law.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
# C_2016374EN.01000101.xml

| 13.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.7878 — HeidelbergCement/Schwenk/Cemex Hungary/Cemex Croatia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 374/01)

On 10 October 2016, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No M.7878 — HeidelbergCement/Schwenk/Cemex Hungary/Cemex Croatia, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
#### 219.270-3 Solicitation provision.

Use the provision 252.219-7012, Competition for Religious-Related Services, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial services, for the acquisition of religious-related services to be performed on U.S. military installations, when the acquisition is set aside for any of the small business concerns identified in FAR 19.000(a)(3).

[83 FR 16002, Apr. 13, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 6583, Jan. 31, 2023]
## Department Boards and Committees

From time to time the U.S. Department of Education receives inquires related to the Department’s Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) boards/committees or other committees. See the list below of advisory boards/committees and other groups.

### Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Boards/Committes

Through the enactment of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (P.L. 92-463, as amended; 5 U.S.C. App.), the U. S. Congress formally recognized the merits of seeking the advice and assistance of our nation's citizens.

- President's Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and Universities
- Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans
- Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence and Economic Opportunity for Hispanics
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Advisory Board
- National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity
- National Advisory Council on Indian Education
- National Board for Education Sciences

### Operational Committees

- Commission on Presidential Scholars 
- National Committee on Foreign Medical Education and Accreditation

### Independent Organizations Affiliated with the Department of Education

- National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB)

For Questions Related to Boards and Committees for the U.S. Department of Education Contact:  By Mail:  U.S. Department of Education  Office of the Secretary/Committee Management Office  400 Maryland Avenue, SW  Washington, DC 20202  By Email:cmtemgmtoffice@ed.gov

For detailed information on budget, charters, members, accomplishments, meetings, and reports for all government advisory committees, go to the GSA FACA (Federal Advisory Committee Act) Database.
');
	document.write('

September 7, 2010

Dear Chief State School Officers:

As you prepare for another school  year, we want to provide you with some important information related to  reporting fraud, waste, and abuse of funds from the U.S. Department of  Education (Department).  We know that 2010  has been particularly busy for everyone.   Funds made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act have  provided an unprecedented opportunity to save jobs and advance reforms that  improve student achievement.  With this  opportunity comes increased responsibility for all of us to conduct ourselves  ethically and to mitigate the risk of waste, fraud, and abuse.

Like you, the Department,  including the Office of Inspector General (OIG), works to ensure that education  dollars reach intended recipients and serve intended purposes.  We also work to ensure that these funds and  programs funded by the Department are protected from fraud, waste, and  abuse.  As part of this important effort,  we are providing several resources that describe fraud laws and how to report  fraud at www.ed.gov/fraudprevention.  Please distribute this information widely  among your employees, subgrantees, and contractors.

The OIG identifies and  investigates individuals and groups who may have committed fraud with education  funds or with respect to Department-funded programs.  Each week, criminals are prosecuted and  convicted, and receive sentences that include significant prison terms and  monetary penalties.  Cases have included  school or college officials making false statements regarding grant eligibility  and performance; creating false documents to obtain grants for students who do  not attend the school or are enrolled in ineligible programs; setting up shell  companies to which education dollars are funneled; embezzling money from school  accounts; using school accounts and credit cards to make purchases for personal  purposes; and accepting bribes and kickbacks from contractors.

Please help us put a stop to  these crimes.  In addition to reading and  distributing this information, report any suspicion of fraud, waste, or abuse  to the OIG Special Agent in Charge in your geographic area.  Contact information is available at the  following Web site:  http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oig/oigaddress.html.

You  also may contact the OIG by e-mailing oig.hotline@ed.gov; calling 1-800-MISUSED  (1-800-647-8733); or writing to:  Inspector  General’s Hotline, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Inspector General,  400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20202-1500.

Thank you for your continued  leadership and efforts on behalf of your students.

Sincerely,



/s/
      /s/Arne Duncan
      Kathleen S. Tighe




|cc: | Chief State School Officers                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | State CCDF Lead Agency Officials                                   
|    | State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care Chairs
#### 236.604 Performance evaluation.

Prepare a separate performance evaluation after actual construction of the project. Ordinarily, the evaluating official should be the person most familiar with the architect-engineer contractor's performance.

[76 FR 58155, Sept. 20, 2011]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/Mark A. Severson
-----------------------------------------
Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer

August 5, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2414.404-1 Cancellation of invitations after opening. ( c ) Invitations may be cancelled and all bids rejected before award but after opening when the Head of the Contracting Activity, as described in subpart 2402.1, determines in writing that cancellation is appropriate and consistent with FAR 14.404-1.
[50 FR 46577, Nov. 8, 1985]
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                 COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON AND
                             COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                  (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                     Fiscal years ended September 30,
                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                1997               1996                 1995
                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------
PRIMARY
<S>                                                             <C>                <C>                  <C>  
     Average common shares outstanding                          6,851              6,795                6,748
     Net effect of dilutive stock options - based 
     on the treasury stock method using 
     average market price                                          --                157                   30
                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------
    Total                                                       6,851              6,952                6,778
     Net income (loss)                                       $(11,184)            $5,685               $1,399
     Per share amount                                        $  (1.63)            $ 0.82               $ 0.21
                                                       =============================================================

FULLY DILUTED
     Average common shares outstanding                          6,851              6,795                6,748
     Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on
      the treasury stock method using the year-end
      market price, if higher than average market                  --                159                   30
      price
                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------
     Total                                                      6,851              6,953                6,778
     Net income (loss)                                       $(11,184)            $5,685               $1,399
     Per share amount                                        $  (1.63)            $ 0.82               $ 0.21
                                                       =============================================================

</TABLE>



                                       36
#### 252.229-7012 Tax exemptions (Italy)—representation.

As prescribed in 229.402-70(c)(2), use the following provision:

# Tax Exemptions (Italy)—Representation (MAR 2012)

(a) *Exemptions.* The United States Government is exempt from payment of—

(1) Imposta Valore Aggiunto (IVA) tax in accordance with Article 72 of the IVA implementing decree on all supplies and services sold to United States Military Commands in Italy; and

(2) The other taxes specified in paragraph (c) of the clause DFARS 252.229-7003, Tax Exemptions (Italy).

(b) *Representation.* By submission of its offer, the offeror represents that the offered price, including the prices of subcontracts to be awarded under the contract, does not include the taxes identified herein, or any other taxes from which the United States Government is exempt.

(End of provision)

[77 FR 19131, Mar. 30, 2012]
# C_2016383EN.01000101.xml

| 17.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 383/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 371, 10.10.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 364, 3.10.2016

OJ C 350, 26.9.2016

OJ C 343, 19.9.2016

OJ C 335, 12.9.2016

OJ C 326, 5.9.2016

OJ C 314, 29.8.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### 232.412 Contract clause.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


The companies listed below are all of the subsidiaries of ACR Group, Inc.
as of February 28, 1998.  All of the companies are wholly-owned.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



Name of Subsidiary                             State of Incorporation
------------------                             ----------------------
<S>                                            <C>

ACR Supply, Inc.                                       Texas
Total Supply, Inc.                                     Texas
Valley Supply, Inc.                                    Texas
Heating and Cooling Supply, Inc.                       Nevada
Time Energy Systems Southwest, Inc.                    Texas
Ener-Tech Industries, Inc.                             Tennessee
Florida Cooling Supply, Inc.                           Texas
West Coast HVAC Supply, Inc.                           Texas
Lifetime Filter, Inc.                                  Texas
Contractors Heating & Supply, Inc.                     Texas
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

PNC Bank, National Association, successor .in
interest by merger to National City Bank, successor in
interest by merger to Mid America Bank, FSB

Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:12 cv 05196
Allen Gibson a/k/a Allen J. Gibson; Kathleen Gibson Assigned Judge: Sharon Johnson Coleman
a/k/a Kathleen M. Gibson, Magistrate Judge: Nan R. Nolan
Defendants.

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND SALE
NOW COMES the Plaintiff, PNC Bank, National Association, successor in interest by merger to

National City Bank, successor in interest by merger to Mid America Bank, FSB, by its attorneys Crowley
& Lamb, P.C., and moves the Court for the entry of a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale in its favor and
against the Defendant(s):

Allen Gibson a/k/a Allen J. Gibson and Kathleen Gibson a/k/a Kathleen M. Gibson, and as

grounds thereof state:

As appears from the Affidavit of Plaintiff in support of this Motion attached as Exhibit A hereto,

and from the pleadings and admissions on file, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the

Plaintiff is entitled to a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale in this case as a matter of law.

PNC Bank, National Association, successor in interest !
by merger to National City Bank, successor in
interest by merger to Mid America Bank, FSB

By: __/s/ Jeffrey B. Dovitz
One of Its Attorneys

Patrick D. Lamb (ARDC #3128062)
Jeffrey B. Dovitz (ARDC#6288119)
CROWLEY & LAMB, P.C.

221 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1550
Chicago, Hlinois 60601

(312) 670-6900
plamb@crowleylamb.com

jdovitz @crowleylamb.com