alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017001EN.01000201.xml

| 4.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 January 2017

(2017/C 1/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0385 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4341 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84565 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5348 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0702 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0013 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,020 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,94 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3934 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5228 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,7261 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4387 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3962 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,0554 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5016 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5061 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 253,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,2840 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2285 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5655 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 998,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6655 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,765 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,9125 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,287 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3916 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4935 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,0010 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0385

JPY

Japanese yen

122,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4341

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84565

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5348

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0702

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0013

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,020

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,94

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3934

RON

Romanian leu

4,5228

TRY

Turkish lira

3,7261

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4387

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3962

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,0554

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5016

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5061

KRW

South Korean won

1 253,43

ZAR

South African rand

14,2840

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2285

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5655

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 998,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6655

PHP

Philippine peso

51,765

RUB

Russian rouble

62,9125

THB

Thai baht

37,287

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3916

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4935

INR

Indian rupee

71,0010

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 12



Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries



Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



|                                                                                    |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |      |     |      |   |     |  |   |    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --- | ---- | - | ---- |  | ---- | --- | ---- | - | --- |  | - | ---
|                                                                                    |  | Years Ended December 31,
|(Dollars in millions)                                                               |  | 2009                     |     | 2008 |   | 2007 |  | 2006 |     | 2005
|Earnings:                                                                           |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |      |     |      |   |     |  |   |    
|Income from continuing operations before provision for income tax                   |  | $                        | 126 |      | $ | 162  |  | $    | 234 |      | $ | 291 |  | $ | 232
|Fixed charges                                                                       |  |                          | 175 |      |   | 223  |  |      | 297 |      |   | 353 |  |   | 359
|Income from continuing operations before provision for income tax and fixed charges |  | $                        | 301 |      | $ | 385  |  | $    | 531 |      | $ | 644 |  | $ | 591
|                                                                                   
|Fixed charges:                                                                      |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |      |     |      |   |     |  |   |    
|Interest expense                                                                    |  | $                        | 175 |      | $ | 223  |  | $    | 297 |      | $ | 353 |  | $ | 359
|                                                                                   
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                  |  |                          | 1.7 |      |   | 1.7  |  |      | 1.8 |      |   | 1.8 |  |   | 1.6
|                                                                                   



43
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 57 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 57

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance 
                with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2018

Mr. Moran (for himself, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Lankford, 
Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Johnson, 
   Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Heller, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Scott, and Mr. Boozman) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance 
                with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal Credit 
Opportunity Act'' (CFPB Bulletin 2013-02 (March 21, 2013), and printed 
in the Congressional Record on December 6, 2017, on pages S7888-S7889, 
along with a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability 
Office dated December 5, 2017, that the Bulletin is a rule under the 
Congressional Review Act), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
- Home
      - **About**
      - People
      - Programs
      - Funding
      - Policy
      - Products 
      - Resources
      - Contact

The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) understands the many challenges still facing individuals with disabilities and their families. Therefore, OSERS is committed to improving results and outcomes for people with disabilities of all ages. OSERS supports programs that serve millions of children, youth and adults with disabilities.

### OSERS Components

      -  **Office of the Assistant Secretary (OAS)** 
      **Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP)**
**Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA)**

### Additional Information

      - **OSERS' Mission Statement** 
      - **Founding Law and Legislation**

 Top

### OSERS Navigation

About OSERS | People and Offices | Programs and ProjectsGrants and Funding | Legislation and Policy | Publications, Products, Research and StatisticsAdditional Resources | Contact and Feedback
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00612-CV

M&M Orthodontics, P.A., Appellant

v.

ACS State Healthcare, LLC and The State of Texas, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-14-00321, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant M&M Orthodontics, P.A. has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the

appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: March 4, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Kevin R. Millison, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                           
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|February 8, 2010 |  | /s/ KEVIN R. MILLISON                     
|                 |  | Kevin R. Millison                         
|                 |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



48
M14004

Part II, Section B – Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – 2 1. Operation Description 2. Worker Exposure / Environmental Release Page 1 of 1



## CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
#### 22.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.

The office administering the contract shall report, in accordance with agency procedures, any potential or actual labor disputes that may interfere with performing any contracts under its cognizance. If a contract contains the clause at 52.222-1, Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes, the contractor also must report any actual or potential dispute that may delay contract performance.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3

v. No. A-1-CA-35111 4 WILLIAM DANIEL MARTINEZ, 5 Defendant-Appellee. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 7 Karen L. Townsend, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 John J. Woykovsky, Assistant Attorney General 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Appellant 13 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender 14 Mary Barket, Assistant Appellate Defender 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 FRENCH, Judge. 192 {1} The State of New Mexico (Plaintiff) appeal s the district court’s orders granting 1 Defendant William Daniel Martinez’s motion to dismiss and dismissal of charge 2 without prejudice. Defendant was charged w ith a single count of aggravated fleeing 3 a law enforcement officer pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 30-22-1.1 (2003). The 4 sole issue before the district court was whether the deputy’s vehicle was an 5 “appropriately marked law enforcement vehicle” pursuant to Section 30-22-1.1(A). 6 The district court found (1) that the law en forcement vehicle “was equipped with red 7 and blue LED lights located within the grill area that were visible through the grill 8 even when not activated[,]” (2) that the vehicle “had a siren, the speakers of which 9 were also located within the grill area[,]” (3 ) “[t]he vehicle had an antenna that is not 10 common to civilian vehicles[,]” and (4) the deputy “activated his red and blue flashing 11 lights and his siren” resulting in Defendant eluding the deputy. Importantly, the 12 district court also found that the law enforcement vehicle “bore no insignias, stripes, 13 decals, labels, seals, symbols or other pictorial signs or lettering indicating its identity 14 as a law enforcement vehicle.” In conc luding that the deputy’s vehicle was not 15 “appropriately marked” pursuant to Section 30-22-1.1(A), the district court ruled that 16 to be marked, “requires at a minimum so me type of readily observable insignia or 17 lettering that conveys the identity or ownership of the vehicle.” 183 {2} This case raises the same issue, appropriately markedlaw enforcement vehicle, 1 pursuant to Section 30-22-1.1(A), as the one this Court recently decided in State v. 2 Montano , ___-NMCA-___, ¶¶ 1, 35-47, ___P .3d___(No. A-1-CA-35275, March 29, 3 2018). For the same reasons as those discussed in Montano , we reverse. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

______________________________ 6 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 7
WE CONCUR: 8

___________________________________ 9 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge 10

___________________________________ 11 HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge 12
#### 225.7100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart contains foreign product restrictions that are based on policies designed to protect the defense industrial base.
EXHIBIT 32
















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purposes of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon its request.





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Jeffrey B. Davis, Chief Executive Officer of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), and Stephen B. Thompson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period specified.





Signed at the City of  Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 31st day of March, 2011.








/s/ Jeffrey B. Daivs                                                 /s/ Stephen B. Thompson


Jeffrey B. Davis                                                                        Stephen B. Thompson


Chief Executive Officer                                                            Chief Financial Officer


Principal Executive Officer                                                     Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32

April 3,
2008

Via
EDGAR

Securities
and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the Annual Report of Mesa Offshore Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

| |  | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                     

---



QuickLinks
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1711

_____________________________

HOZELL COLE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

February 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Hozell Cole, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# C_2016466EN.01000301.xml

| 14.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 466/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 466/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8295 — AXA/ATP/Target)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 466/05)

On 5 December 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8295. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8295. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 243.107-70 Notification of substantial impact on employment.

The Secretary of Defense is required to notify the Secretary of Labor if a modification of a major defense contract or subcontract will have a substantial impact on employment. The clause prescribed at 249.7003(c) requires that the contractor notify its employees, its subcontractors, and State and local officials when a contract modification will have a substantial impact on employment.

[56 FR 67220, Dec. 30, 1991, as amended at 70 FR 67922, Nov. 9, 2005]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Charles W. Fischer,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian  Corporation (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended  September  30,  2007 as filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
     Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
     Company.



Date:    October 26, 2007                  /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles W. Fischer
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Chart 11377HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       11377          Edition:       9          Edition Date:       May 2010          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/22/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
#### 1322.404 Davis-Bacon Act wage determination.