alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 7, 2007



By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer



















CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 7, 2007



By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Camco Financial Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Camco as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
 4.
    
    Camcos other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(f) and
15d 15(f))for Camco and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to Camco, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Camcos disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in Camcos internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Camcos fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Camcos internal control
over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    Camcos other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of Camcos board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 b.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in Camcos internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 7, 2009
    By:
    /s/ James E. HustonJames E. Huston, Chief Executive Officer
#### William F. Drake, by Doris M. Drake, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Mae V. Marks et al., Appellants. Doris M. Drake, Respondent, v. Mae V. Marks et al., *Appellants.*

*Per Curiam.*

Upon all the facts, and under the circumstances demonstrated, we find no compelling reason to disturb Special Term’s exercise of discretion in changing the place of trial to Broome County, upon the new motion permitted by our prior decision (20 A D 2d 614). Order affirmed, with $75 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
#### 1446.708 Warranties of data.

Warranties of data shall only be used after consultation with the SOL.
#### Henry S. Slesinger, Respondent, v Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[834 NYS2d 107]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered June 29, 2005, granting the petition to the extent of annulling respondent agency’s determination that petitioner is not entitled to succeed to the cooperative apartment in question, and remanding the matter to respondent to consider whether petitioner had filed the relevant tax returns as proof of his primary residence, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied and the proceeding dismissed.

In the context of a CPLR article 78 proceeding, it is established that judicial review is limited to a determination of whether the administrative decision is arbitrary and capricious, or lacks a rational basis (see *Matter of Tockwotten Assoc. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*7 AD3d 453, 454 [2004]; *Red Apple Child Dev. Ctr. v Chancellor’s Bd. of Review,*307 AD2d 815 [2003]), and where such rational basis exists, an administrative agency’s construction and interpretation of its own regulations are entitled to great deference (see *Matter of Salvati v Eimicke,*72 NY2d 784, 791 [1988]; *Matter of Arif v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn.,*3 AD3d 345, 346 [2004]). Moreover, “[¡Judicial review of administrative determinations is confined to the facts and record adduced before the agency” *(Matter ofYarbough v Franco,*95 NY2d 342, 347 [2000] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see *also Matter of Picon v Johnson,*30 AD3d 301, 302 [2006]).

In this matter, it is clear from a review of the administrative *247record that respondent’s determination that petitioner was not entitled to succession rights was neither arbitrary or capricious, nor did it lack a rational basis. Petitioner failed to submit adequate documentation to establish that he resided in the subject premises for the requisite time period, in that, inter aha: he neglected to submit an income affidavit for the year 1998; his New York State income tax returns did not show proof of filing; his voter registration and jury service notice only indicated that he had ties to New York, but did not demonstrate his primary residence was here; an affidavit from a neighbor which, while attesting to petitioner’s close relationship with the prior resident, failed to state that petitioner actually resided in the apartment during the critical period; and he failed to submit financial or employment documents confirming his purported address. Further, the hearing court improperly remanded the matter to respondent to consider additional evidence, this being especially so since petitioner had ample opportunity to compile the relevant documentation. Concur—Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
On February 26, 2014, OCR resolved a Title IX compliance review of the Indianapolis Public Schools (District). OCR’s investigation revealed that the District’s interscholastic athletics program failed to provide girls an equal opportunity to participate in high school interscholastic athletics and failed to provide girls equal opportunity in interscholastic athletics with respect the provision of locker rooms and practice and competitive facilities, the provision of equipment and supplies, and the  scheduling of games and practice times. OCR determined that the District was in violation of Title IX. Under the terms of the agreement with OCR, the District commits to ensuring that it will provide an equal opportunity for female students to participate in the athletics programs at its high schools. The resolution agreement also requires the District to improve the athletic facilities, equipment and supplies, and primetime scheduling of game and practice times provided for girls’ teams.
  Last Modified: 01/15/2020
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 64826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26081]

[[Page 64826]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM)

Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Interior.

ACTION: List of Restricted Joint Bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the Bureau 
of Ocean Energy Management by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 
556.41, each entity within one of the following groups shall be 
restricted from bidding with any entity in any of the other following 
groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held 
during the bidding period November 1, 2012 through April 30, 2013. This 
List of Restricted Joint Bidders will cover the period November 1, 2012 
thru April 30, 2013, and replace the prior list published on April 26, 
2012; which covered the period of May 1, 2012, to October 31, 2012.

Group I. Exxon Mobil Corporation

ExxonMobil Exploration Company

Group II. Shell Oil Company

Shell Offshore Inc.
SWEPI LP
Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.
SOI Finance Inc.
Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.

Group III. BP America Production Company

BP Exploration & Production Inc.
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

Group IV. Chevron Corporation

Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.
Unocal Corporation
Union Oil Company of California
Pure Partners, L.P.

Group V. ConocoPhillips Company

ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
Phillips Pt. Arguello Production Company
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP
Burlington Resources Offshore Inc.
The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company
Inexeco Oil Company

Group VI. Eni Petroleum Co. Inc.

Eni Petroleum US LLC
Eni Oil US LLC
Eni Marketing Inc
Eni BB Petroleum Inc.
Eni US Operating Co. Inc.
Eni BB Pipeline LLC

Group VII. Statoil ASA

Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC
Statoil USA E&P Inc.
Statoil Gulf Properties Inc.

Group VIII. Petrobras America Inc.

Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.

Group IX. Total E&P USA, Inc.

    Dated: October 10, 2012.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2012-26081 Filed 10-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
#### 1836.213-370 Additive and deductive items.

When it appears that funds available for a project may be insufficient for all the desired features of construction, the contracting officer may provide in the invitation for bids for a first or base bid item covering the work generally as specified and one or more additive or deductive bid items progressively adding or omitting specified features of the work in a stated order of priority. In such case, the contracting officer, before the opening of bids, shall record in the contract file the amount of funds available for the project and determine the low bidder and the items to be awarded in accordance with the provision at 1852.236-71, Additive or Deductive Items.

[62 FR 36721, July 9, 1997. Redesignated at 64 FR 5621, Feb. 4, 1999]
September 19, 2023

Dear Colleague,

As the school year starts, I am writing to ask for your assistance and partnership with an urgent need for America's students and families: reenrollment in Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage.

With the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency this past April, individuals who relied on Medicaid and CHIP for health insurance coverage will no longer be automatically re-enrolled. In effect, this means that millions of children and families across the country may be at risk of losing key coverage they rely on for medical care.

As we well know, when children are healthy and well, they do better on all indicators of achievement, academic performance, attendance, grades, cognitive skills, attitudes and class behavior.1 More than half of all school children rely on Medicaid and CHIP for health coverage. The majority of children and youth will still be eligible for Medicaid and CHIP but need to act quickly to re-enroll and remain in coverage. I am writing to ask for your collaboration – as you engage members of your local community – to help build awareness among students and families that they need to act to re-enroll in Medicaid coverage, and to help assist them in doing so.

To help in making Medicaid reenrollment easier for the students and families you serve, the Department of Education and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have developed an easy, two-page checklist that education and community leaders can use to help families to navigate Medicaid reenrollment – complete with links to toolkits, videos, resource banks, and other assets that can help you spread the word about these crucial action steps. Our children and their families may look to you as trusted community leaders for help, and I want to make sure you have the information you need.

We are doing all that we can to help inform students and families about the steps that they need to take to renew their Medicaid and CHIP coverage. Please help us by spreading the word, and by engaging the students and families you work with to take action to reenroll in Medicaid today.

Please share this video message from me and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, on the importance of re-enrolling in Medicaid/CHIP.

Thank you for all you do on behalf of our nation's children. The steps you take today will help ensure that our students maintain the essential coverage and support that they depend on for their health and well-being in school!

Sincerely,/s/Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D.U.S. Secretary of Education

----

1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. “Health and Academic Achievement.” 2014. Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/index.htm
2419.804-2 Agency offering. ( d ) When applicable, the notification must identify that the offering is in accordance with the Partnership Agreement identified in 2419.800.
[77 FR 73529, Dec. 10, 2012]
Chart 11346HOME | ABOUT             US | CONTACT             | REGIONAL             MANAGERSNautical             Charts & Pubs Surveys             & WrecksGIS             & Other ProductsResearch             & DevelopmentCustomer             ServiceBusiness             OpportunitiesEducation      Chart:       11346          Edition:       2          Edition Date:       April       2009          Clear       Dates: NM - 7/3/2010     LNM -       6/22/2010      Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart       Site-               Click the +/- buttons               and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) to zoom in and out.                             
-               Click the arrow               buttons to pan left/right and up/down.              
-               Drag the navigation               box in the upper left hand corner to move around the chart image.               This chart display or derived product can be used as a               planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational               aid. NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical               chart for real navigation whenever possible. These are available               from authorized NOAA nautical chart sales agents. Screen captures               of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart               carriage requirements for regulated commercial vessels under               Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.  Adobe Flash Player  is required to view the chart               image.Powered by  Zoomify .
Privacy  |         Disclaimer  |         NOAA's       National Ocean Service  |   NOAA  |         U.S. Department       of Commerce
#### 50 New Walden, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Thomas H. McKaig, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously reversed, with $25 costs *585and disbursements and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: The motion for discovery and inspection should have been granted in the exercise of sound discretion. Special Term denied the motion on the ground that the documents to be produced and examined included opinions as to the cause of the collapse of a building. Such opinion evidence, Special Term said, would not be admissible under section 324 of the Civil Practice Act. Possible inadmissibility alone would not necessarily preclude the examination. *(Beyer*v. *Keller,*11 A D 2d 426; *O’Grady*v. *Burr,*2 A D 2d 712.) If specific objections are made during the examination or at trial, either Special Term or the Trial Judge, as the ease may be, will be able to determine the extent of discovery during the examination, or to pass upon admissibility during the trial. *(De Vito*v. *New York Cent. R. R. Co.,*32 Misc 2d 495, affd. 3 A D 2d 692.) The order should be reversed and the motion granted. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying plaintiffs’ motion for discovery and inspection.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.
#### 252.201-7000 Contracting officer's representative.

As prescribed in 201.602-70, use the following clause:

# Contracting Officer's Representative (DEC 1991)

(a) *Definition. Contracting officer's representative* means an individual designated in accordance with subsection 201.602-2 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement and authorized in writing by the contracting officer to perform specific technical or administrative functions.

(b) If the Contracting Officer designates a contracting officer's representative (COR), the Contractor will receive a copy of the written designation. It will specify the extent of the COR's authority to act on behalf of the contracting officer. The COR is not authorized to make any commitments or changes that will affect price, quality, quantity, delivery, or any other term or condition of the contract.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 42633, Sept. 15, 1992]
242.1502 Policy. ( g ) Past performance evaluations in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System— ( i ) Shall include an assessment of the contractor's performance against, and efforts to achieve, the goals identified in its comprehensive small business subcontracting plan when the contract contains the clause at 252.219-7004, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Test Program); and
( ii ) Shall, unless exempted by the head of the contracting activity, include a notation on contractors that have denied multiple requests for submission of data other than certified cost or pricing data over the preceding 3-year period, but nevertheless received an award (10 U.S.C. 3705(b)(2)(B)).
[87 FR 65504, Oct. 28, 2022, as amended at 87 FR 76996, Dec. 16, 2022]
#### 1852.300 Scope of subpart.

The matrix in this subpart contains a column for each principal type and/or purpose of contract. See the first page of the matrix for the key to column headings, the dollar threshold chart, and requirement symbols.

[57 FR 40856, Sept. 8, 1992]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-14-1997<F1>
<CASH>                                          23,427
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  633,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,416
<INVENTORY>                                    431,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,082,148
<PP&E>                                       1,653,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                 637,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,439,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          659,474
<BONDS>                                        761,635
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       320,778
<OTHER-SE>                                     319,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,439,648
<SALES>                                      2,072,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,072,796
<CGS>                                        1,730,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,730,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            112,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   112,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.86
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S FISCAL YEAR ENDS ON THE SATURDAY CLOSEST TO DECEMBER 31. FISCAL
YEAR 1997 CONSISTS OF 52 WEEKS AND ENDS ON JANUARY 3, 1998. ALL QUARTERS IN
1997 HAVE 12 WEEKS, EXCEPT THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1997 WHICH HAS 16 WEEKS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### 239.7300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements 10 U.S.C. 3252 and elements of DoD Instruction 5200.44, Protection of Mission Critical Functions to Achieve Trusted Systems and Networks (TSN), at *https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520044p.pdf?ver=2018-11-08-075800-903.*

[84 FR 4369, Feb. 15, 2019, as amended at 87 FR 76995, Dec. 16, 2022]