alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of William Smith, an Attorney.

It appears that on November 4, 1960, this attorney was convicted in the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, County of New York, of certain misdemeanors, to wit: violating section 273 of the Penal Law and of conspiracy to violate said section, in that, while representing certain defendants about to be sentenced in said court for violating section 974 of the Penal Law (relating to gambling, lottery and “policy” wagers), he deceived the court by stating that such defendants had no prior criminal record when he knew that they did, since he had previously represented them. The attorney now submits his resignation as an attorney and counselor at law. The resignation is accepted; his name is ordered to be struck from the roll of attorneys. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
| **Name**      | Federal Student Aid Information Center |
|---------------|----------------------------------------|
| **Telephone** | (800) 433-3243 or 800 4FED-AID         |
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 30. Sessile fauna and flora on the bottom at station 18.       These organisms commonly cover boulders in high-energy environments.       Station location is shown in figures 15 and 29. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig30.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:14:18 EDT
UG
& eo. e
Ar

_ DERE, DDoS Ga Fe inednand

DIA Mol Adme is  Chagles ESRI Cire ald 1202 AND I have
IN SeAns Concean ter need elo cst, SA Mah aso -his

Is onlockdoun duets a Serious ser? Assault Aycl
Loe Wwe een Since Sanoval OF 2ori. secven Tr hwe \ 2255"

Ome® Aue in Froit CF dou ‘ol MAAC ize Conic ut the
ime dau hecieve nis letboe Uaill be bebtind us. Sia bepe’s
una “the Oacblem's Tr Ustcke the Cout fF Roe als ia kpanting,
hem BF Wiis Oadolem Gad Yat TF yeeded Ad “etention £5!
nen As Wor Recieved A Mee Romans (Qexson =thst
imitel CSdnicly uss “inh Tel 2011 And w

awe . AGaelio) bespouded loack satin “net tc Do wk
\ame A rE Rl dee on Tle hich + Curteretand hecase
Mat Agree” Los de nied on Lilo lo Dea he Aviles GF the
Coder ae have atte Nena Fann —tnet Ake to le cmf 2255"
wonich oes in Fo Se se doa sp sia To tn lundol Askéinc
wou ForS a @yterion oakl oatea ddkice Dec ase. Caf SJ
PIABT Aer 15 imOdPtint to Mme Dec mse ANG Like is aq the
Line. Aid Wheat a Goss Sotse be do Cane oes {> _adkhy
“he Corts i syshihons Like -tnis ad + cant AFred to
\oe “ime Snamaed sia. ap Can Uni Qleese NEA &\\ Host
=~ AM Sa fise S-Rue And ORok me & Sxtenhions “Wad KS

RL
FIL ED Chain ioekh

O27 ake
MAR ; i907 2)

1 ROMA G BRUTON
k-U-S-DISTRICT COURT



fag 5. L_ i ane
Cnagtes | SES = STII 08237 “tS SHREVEPORT LA 710)

—__ "
us? falleck £8 MAR 2017 PM 31 en, 2
Pr, Bx 2014 98 a
Pally LA. T1407 -

OFrice oF The Court Cleak

IOI 0000 Tor the US. Distnict Court
03/13/2017-24

QA South Derraan st.
Chi chp il. ovo

s0604-180093 AU th ttt
# C_2016394EN.01000101.xml

| 26.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 394/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8105 — Marmedsa/UECC/UECC Ibérica)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 394/01)

On 18 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8105. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8105. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### In the Matter of Richard I. Katz, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

March 29, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Michael Alan Schwartz*of counsel *(Nicholas C. Cooper,*attorney), for petitioner.

No one appearing on behalf of respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 25, 1976 in the Second Judicial Department. On January 25, 1979, he was convicted in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of receipt of stolen securities (US Code, tit 18, § 2315) and conspiracy to violate that section as well as *37section 659 of title 18 of the United States Code in violation of section 371 of title 18 of the United States Code. Both crimes of which defendant was convicted are felonies under Federal law. Accordingly, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York upon such conviction *(Matter of Thies,*45 NY2d 865).

Respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law.

Birns, J. P., Fein, Sandler, Silverman and Bloom, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF****DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.**This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350,and is filed with respect to the quarterly report onForm 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarterended October 8, 2005 of Dole Food Company, Inc. (the“Issuer”). I, Joseph S. Tesoriero, Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to thebest of my knowledge:     (i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements    of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and      (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Issuer.     /s/ Joseph S. Tesoriero           Joseph S. Tesoriero *Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*November 22, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas Matthews, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered October 25, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and carrying a dangerous weapon (as a felony), and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Although the introduction of the statement, which defendant allegedly made to the Assistant District Attorney, was not proper because it was not signed or acknowledged by defendant *(People*v. *Kenny,*20 A D 2d 578), it was merely a substitute for or a short cut to the stenographer’s oral testimony that the questions of the Assistant District Attorney and the answers made by defendant were heard and recorded by him at the time. The oral testimony of the stenographer as to the questions and answers would have been admissible. In any event, the reception in evidence of the recorded questions and answers did not affect defendant’s substantial rights and does not require a reversal, since there was also testimony by a detective that several hours prior to the alleged confession to the Assistant District Attorney, the defendant had made the same confession to him. The gun used by defendant was properly admitted in evidence; it was not obtained as the result of illegal search and seizure. The gun was owned by one Rodaligo, who gave permission to the police officer to search for it in the apartment of Rodaligo’s parents and thereafter to seize it. When the police officer came to that apartment, the parents also consented to the search. Under the circumstances, there was no illegal search and seizure; nor was defendant entitled to object to use of the gun at his trial *(Wong Sun*v. *United States,*371 U. S. 471; *People*v. *Rodriquez,*11 N Y 2d 279). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Apr MAYSEP272009 20102011 5             captures             15 May 10 - 15 Dec           10CloseHelp
Search HelpMore Search Options
Search 
EERE Information Center
Printable VersionSpring 2010
Welcome to the inaugural issue of Building E2 News, the quarterly newsletter for the U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program. Each issue provides information to improve energy efficiency of new and existing commercial and residential buildings.
A New Benchmark in Commercial Building Energy Performance
The U.S. Department of Energy is funding the construction of the nation's largest net-zero energy office building at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Read this article to learn about the design/build approach and the innovative features of this building that helped designers reach the net-zero energy goal.

Read more
Honoring Energy Leadership in Homebuilding
Five U.S. builders recently took top awards for excellence in creating high-performance homes that all meet the U.S. Department of Energy Builders Challenge criteria. This article describes how these builders are constructing beautiful and functional homes that are showcases of energy leadership.

Read more
Commercial Reference Buildings—Benefits and Applications
Join the Building Technologies Program Webinar on May 18 to learn about the benefits of commercial reference buildings—complete descriptions of buildings for whole building energy analysis using EnergyPlus simulation software.

View the full list of events
Interview with Richard King, Solar Decathlon Director
The U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon challenges 20 collegiate teams to design, build, and operate solar-powered houses that are affordable, energy-efficient, and attractive. Read our interview with Richard King, director of the competition, to learn about what’s new for the 2011 event.

Read more
Drexel Smart House "Living Laboratory"
Plan to attend a free lecture on May 24 on the Drexel House, a multidisciplinary student organization committed to researching and developing alternative energy systems and smart technologies for residential living.

Visit the Museum's Web site
Calculating Energy Savings of Cool Roofs
Cool roofs are a simple, efficient way to reduce building energy use and increase occupant comfort. A new Roof Savings Calculator is now available to measure cost-effectiveness of cool roof technology.

Read more
New Air Sealing Guide for Existing Homes
Did you know that air sealing measures can increase whole-house energy savings by 10%-20%? Read Building America's new air sealing guide to learn about ways to increase the energy efficiency, safety, and comfort of your home.

Read the new air sealing guide 
Printable Version- Archives
- Subscribe
In This Issue- >   Commercial News
- >   Residential News
- >   Special Guest
- >   Technology Spotlight

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of EnergyWebmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: May 11, 2010
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:140
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 2 of 26 PageID #:141
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 3 of 26 PageID #:142
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 4 of 26 PageID #:143
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 5 of 26 PageID #:144
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 6 of 26 PageID #:145
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 7 of 26 PageID #:146
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 8 of 26 PageID #:147
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 9 of 26 PageID #:148
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 10 of 26 PageID #:149
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 11 of 26 PageID #:150
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 12 of 26 PageID #:151
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 13 of 26 PageID #:152
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 14 of 26 PageID #:153
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 15 of 26 PageID #:154
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 16 of 26 PageID #:155
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 17 of 26 PageID #:156
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 18 of 26 PageID #:157
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 19 of 26 PageID #:158
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 20 of 26 PageID #:159
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 21 of 26 PageID #:160
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 22 of 26 PageID #:161
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 23 of 26 PageID #:162
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 24 of 26 PageID #:163
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 25 of 26 PageID #:164
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/14/12 Page 26 of 26 PageID #:165
#### Benjamin T. Robbins, Respondent, *v.*Jesse Carll, Appellant.

Interest is properly allowable upon an account for work done after presentation and demand for payment.

(Submitted October 11, 1883 ;

decided October 26, 1883.)

This was an action to recover for extra work alleged to have been done by plaintiff in altering and repairing defendant’s dwelling. The questions determined and the facts pertinent thereto appear in the following extract from the opinion.

“ The plaintiff employed a plumber to do extra work ordered by the defendant, and the plumber rendered a bill of the items of the work done by him. The plaintiff, with the bill in his hands while testifying, stated that the articles mentioned in the bill were put in defendant’s house by defendant’s direction. Plaintiff’s counsel then offered the bill in evidence. Defendant’s counsel objected to it as incompetent, immaterial, irrelevant, and as included in the three contracts, and the objections were overruled, the referee saying that he admitted it as a memorandum of the materials and labor furnished on the house, but not as evidence of the value of the labor. It was not admitted to prove the items. But the plaintiff having stated substantially that the items were correct, the paper was received *657simply as a statement or memorandum of the items. Besides, the items were subsequently fully proved by the plumber himself. Hence no rule of law was violated by the receipt of this memorandum, and no damage was thereby done to the defendant.

“We think the interest was properly allowed within the principles laid down and recognized in the case of *White*v. *Miller*(78 N. Y. 393; 34 Am. Rep. 544). The defendant had promised to pay and was liable to pay for the extra work when it was finished. The plaintiff demanded payment. He was told by the defendant to call upon him on Monday after he had finished the work, and that he would then settle with him. Plaintiff called upon him on Monday, and told him that he had called to settle, and asked him for a small bill which he had paid, and for which he was entitled to credit upon plaintiff’s bill. The defendant replied that he would not furnish any bill, and that he never would settle with plaintiff, nor pay him another dollar, and that he would resist payment if sued. If the presentation of an account and demand were necessary to set the interest running upon plaintiff’s claim, what took place at that interview was clearly sufficient.”

*Thomas Young*for appellant.

*Henry C. Platt*for respondent.

Earl, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of aeroTelesis, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the U.S.
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.
 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




November
                  16, 2007
              By:
              */s/ Joseph Gutierrez*Joseph
                  GutierrezPresident,
                  Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                Accounting
                  Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to aeroTelesis, Inc. and will be retained
      by
      aeroTelesis, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its Staff upon request.
##### 



(LOGO)
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Public Health ServiceFood and Drug Administration
9200 Corporate Boulevard
Rockville MD 20850
  
  Re:
    
    K070740
Trade/Device Name: Chad Therapeutics Bonsai Model 800 (Modified Chad Therapeutics OXYPNEUMATIC CYPRESS Model 511) Regulation Number:
868.5905 Regulation Name: Noncontinuous Ventilator (IPPB) Regulatory Class:
II Product Code: NFB Dated: April 21, 2007 Received: April 24, 2007
   Federal Register




---



##### 



http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html
 Sincerely yours,/s/        Chiu LinChiu Lin, Ph.D.Director

Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital,
Infection 
   Control and Dental Devices

Office of Device Evaluation 
Center for
Devices and
Radiological Health




---



##### 



Indications for Use
 510(k) Number (if known):
 Device Name:
 Indications For Use:
  Prescription
Use  
ü
    
    AND/OR
    
    Over-The-Counter Use(Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
    
    
    
    (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
  
  /s/
[ILLEGIBLE]
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **WRITTEN    STATEMENT****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Each of the undersigned, STEVEN F. UDVAR-HAZY, the CHAIRMAN OF    THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, and ALAN H. LUND, the    VICE CHAIRMAN-FINANCE, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF    ACCOUNTING OFFICER of INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION    (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, hereby certifies that to the best of their    knowledge:      (i)        the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year    ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully    complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and      (ii)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     Dated: August 11, 2006/s/  Steven    F. Udvar-Hazy    Steven F. Udvar-Hazy     Dated: August 11, 2006/s/  Alan    H. Lund    Alan H. Lund
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Butler
Manufacturing Company Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarter
ended March 31, 2000, and Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2000, and
is qualified in it entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015840
<NAME> Butler Manufacturing Company
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          19,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     62,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               269,572
<PP&E>                                         244,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 407,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,896
<BONDS>                                         56,939<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,623
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,364<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   407,102
<SALES>                                        219,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,950<F3>
<CGS>                                          184,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,497<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,711
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,496
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,215
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<FN>
<F1>Reflects long-term debt, less current maturities
<F2>Reflects other stockholders' equity before deduction of $57.0 million cost of
treasury stock
<F3>Reflects net sales plus net international joint venture income less net other
expense
<F4>Consists of selling, general, administrative expense, and other expenses
</FN>


</TABLE>