alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A number of committees and other groups assist and advise the U.S. Department of Education in carrying out its mission.  Comprised of individuals who are knowledgeable of education in elementary and secondary schools or postsecondary and adult education institutions, these groups provide valuable guidance to the Department on policy and program issues. The President appoints Commissions to advise him on matters of national importance, including education.  Additionally, the Secretary of Education establishes Commissions that advise both the President and the Department of Education.

- Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships
- White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans
- White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Hispanics
- White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities
- White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Native Americans and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities

**Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships**

- Website for the Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships

**White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans**

- Press Release
- White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans

**White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Hispanics**

- White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Hispanics

**White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities**

- Website for the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities

**White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Native Americans and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities**

- Website for the White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Native Americans and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities

In 1972, the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App) was enacted by Congress. Its purpose was to ensure that advice rendered to the Executive Branch by the various advisory committees, task forces, boards, and commissions formed over the years by Congress, the President and Government Agencies, be both objective and accessible to the public. The Act not only formalized a process for establishing, operating, overseeing, and terminating these advisory groups, but also created the Committee Management Secretariat (MS), an organization located within the General Services Administration (GSA) whose task is to evaluate and monitor Executive Branch compliance with the Act.

For detailed information on budget, charter, members, accomplishments, meetings, and reports on all government advisory committees, go to the GSA FACA (Federal Advisory Committee Act) Database
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 99



                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT




Board of Directors
Carnegie Financial Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Carnegie
Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of September 30, 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income for the nine and three-month periods ended
September 30, 2001 and 2000, the consolidated statement of cash flows for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the consolidated
statement of changes in stockholders' equity for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated February 22, 2001 we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


/s/ S. R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
November 9, 2001
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00412

- CR

Donna Nicole Chamberlain
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18FC

- 0834A

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on
appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
March 16, 2023
237.171-3 Policy. ( a ) Each DoD contract in which contractor personnel, in the course of their duties, interact with detainees shall include a requirement that such contractor personnel— ( 1 ) Receive Government-provided training regarding the international obligations and laws of the United States applicable to the detention of personnel, including the Geneva Conventions; and
( 2 ) Provide a copy of the training receipt document to the contractor.
( b ) The combatant commander responsible for the area where the detention or interrogation facility is located will arrange for the training and a training receipt document to be provided to contractor personnel. For information on combatant commander geographic areas of responsibility and point of contact information for each command, see PGI 237.171-3(b).
[71 FR 53048, Sept. 8, 2006]
225.7020-4 Joint determination. ( a ) The prohibition in section 225.7020-2 does not apply to an acquisition jointly determined by the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State, without power of redelegation, to be— ( 1 ) Necessary for purposes of— ( i ) Providing humanitarian assistance to the people of Venezuela;
( ii ) Disaster relief and other urgent lifesaving measures; or
( iii ) Carrying out noncombatant evacuations; or
( 2 ) Vital to the national security interests of the United States.
( b ) Follow the procedures at PGI 225.7020-4(b) when entering into a contract on the basis of a joint determination.
[87 FR 31960, May 26, 2022]
#### 239.7407 Type of contract.

When acquiring telecommunications services, the contracting officer may use a basic agreement (see FAR 16.702) in conjunction with communication service authorizations. When using this method, follow the procedures at PGI 239.7407.

[71 FR 27646, May 12, 2006]
|  |
|--|

Valerie C. Williams serves as the director in the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) within the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services at the U.S. Department of Education. In this role, she is responsible for overseeing administration of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which authorizes formula grants to states under IDEA Part B and to lead agencies for the infants and families program under IDEA Part C. IDEA also authorizes discretionary grants under IDEA Part D to institutions of higher education and other non-profit organizations to support grants for state personnel development, technical assistance and dissemination, technology, and parent training and information centers.

Williams most recently served for six years as senior director of Government Relations and External Affairs at the National Association of State Directors of Special Education. She has decades of experience, which include supporting state-level special education leaders by overseeing federal government public policy activities, federal regulatory affairs, public relations, and key initiatives to promote equity and guide positive systemic change, thereby improving outcomes for students with disabilities. She also served as the Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Public Policy Fellow, on the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee advancing disability policy and civil rights. Prior to that, she managed the budgeting and finances for numerous multi-million-dollar programs within the Departments of the Navy and the Air Force, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Williams was born in White Sands, New Mexico, and raised in Prince George’s County, Maryland. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Economy of Industrial Societies from the University of California at Berkeley and a Master of Arts in Public Management from Johns Hopkins University. She has a unique perspective, having worked with members of Congress and  staff on Capitol Hill, with advocacy organizations, supporting state special education leaders, and most importantly, being the parent of a son with Down syndrome.
#### 223.7401 Definition.

As used in this subpart—

*Ocean-going vessel* means a vessel over 59 feet in length owned or operated by DoD or the U.S. Coast Guard, other than vessels that are chartered by the Armed Forces on a time or voyage basis.
225.872-3 Solicitation procedures. ( a ) Except for items developed under the U.S./Canadian Development Sharing Program, use the criteria for soliciting and awarding contracts to small business concerns under FAR Part 19 without regard to whether there are potential qualifying country sources for the end product. Do not consider an offer of a qualifying country end product if the solicitation is identified for the exclusive participation of small business concerns.
( b ) Send solicitations directly to qualifying country sources. Solicit Canadian sources through the Canadian Commercial Corporation in accordance with 225.870.
( c ) Use international air mail if solicitation destinations are outside the United States and security classification permits such use.
( d ) If unusual technical or security requirements preclude the acquisition of otherwise acceptable defense equipment from qualifying country sources, review the need for such requirements. Do not impose unusual technical or security requirements solely for the purpose of precluding the acquisition of defense equipment from qualifying countries.
( e ) Do not automatically exclude qualifying country sources from submitting offers because their supplies have not been tested and evaluated by the department or agency. ( 1 ) Consider the adequacy of qualifying country service testing on a case-by-case basis. Departments or agencies that must limit solicitations to sources whose items have been tested and evaluated by the department or agency shall consider supplies from qualifying country sources that have been tested and accepted by the qualifying country for service use.
( 2 ) The department or agency may perform a confirmatory test, if necessary.
( 3 ) Apply U.S. test and evaluation standards, policies, and procedures when the department or agency decides that confirmatory tests of qualifying country end products are necessary.
( 4 ) If it appears that these provisions might adversely delay service programs, obtain the concurrence of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment), before excluding the qualifying country source from consideration.
( f ) Permit industry representatives from a qualifying country to attend symposia, program briefings, prebid conferences (see FAR 14.207 and 15.201(c)), and similar meetings that address U.S. defense equipment needs and requirements. When practical, structure these meetings to allow attendance by representatives of qualifying country concerns.
[68 FR 15621, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 72 FR 20758, Apr. 26, 2007; 88 FR 73237, Oct. 25, 2023]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William P. O’Harra, Appellant.

Defendant-appellant was arrested upon a charge of book-making in violation of section 986 of the Penal Law, in the City of Norwich, Chenango Count;', N. Y. He was taken before the County Judge of Chenango County where he waived his right to counsel, the charge was changed to a violation of section 970 of the Penal Law, being a common gambler, and the defendant, without counsel, entered a plea of guilty and was fined $150. Thereafter defendant obtained counsel, made a motion before the County Judge to vacate the judgment of conviction on the ground that the County Judge or the County Court of Chenango County lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter. The motion was denied and from that denial this appeal was taken. Section 56 of the Code of Criminal Procedure expressly grants exclusive jurisdiction of the misdemeanors listed therein to Courts of Special Sessions. A violation of section 986 of the Penal Law, with which the defendant was originally charged, and a violation of section 970 of the same law, to which he pleaded guilty, are misdemeanors listed in subdivision 35-a of section 56. The offense was alleged to have been committed within the City of Norwich. Concededly the City Court of the City of Norwich is a Court of Special Sessions, and the Comity Court, being a court of record, is not a Court of Special Sessions. It is not contended that any certificate of removal under section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was obtained. Absent such a certificate of removal neither the County Court nor the Supreme Court had any jurisdiction over the offense originally charged against defendant or the offense to which he entered a plea of guilty and upon which sentence was imposed. (Code Grim. Pro., § 56; *People ex re). Morrison*v. *Pollack,*264 App. Div. 92, affd. 289 N. Y. 600; *People*v. *Knatt,*156 N. Y. 302; *People*v. *Monahan,*233 App. Div. 16.) Order reversed, upon the law, and the motion granted, the judgment of conviction is vacated and the remission of the fine to the defendant is directed. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### 22.1102 Definition.

*Professional employee,* as used in this subpart, means any person meeting the definition of *employee employed in a bona fide . . . professional capacity* given in 29 CFR part 541. The term embraces members of those professions having a recognized status based upon acquiring professional knowledge through prolonged study. Examples of these professions include accountancy, actuarial computation, architecture, dentistry, engineering, law, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, the sciences (such as biology, chemistry, and physics), and teaching. To be a professional employee, a person must not only be a professional but must be involved essentially in discharging professional duties.

[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2130, Jan. 10, 2001]
#### 1847.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
#### 236.211 Distribution of advance notices and solicitations.

See PGI 236.211 for instructions on reporting data for definitization of requests for equitable adjustment.

[88 FR 73237, Oct. 25, 2023]
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

I, Michael S. Sarner, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

|  | 1. |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2016 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|                       |   |                    |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| Date:  August 9, 2016 | By:    | /s/ Michael S. Sarner   |
|                       |   | Michael S. Sarner       |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7589

ROBBIE COLLINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY PADULA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior 

District Judge. (2:12-cv-00710-CMC)

Submitted: February 11, 2014 Decided: February 19, 2014

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robbie Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Alphonso Simon, Jr., Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robbie Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly 

after expiration of the appeal period. Because Collins is 

incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it 

was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the 

court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 

266 (1988). Although the record indicates that Collins did not 

give the notice of appeal to prison officials until after 

expiration of the appeal period, Collins claimed in the notice 

that he had sent an earlier notice of appeal to the district 

court. The record does not contain any earlier notice of appeal 

or reveal when Collins may have given any such notice of appeal 

to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the 

case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to 

obtain this information from the parties and to determine 

whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and 

Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be 

returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsFigure 2. Number of Corophium spp. /m2 by station at Beach Nourishment Area O-34.0 in the lower Columbia River. Sampling was conducted in July and October 1994 and January and April 1995. Odd- and even-numbered stations were located about 15 and 30 m, respectively, from the high tide mark on the beach.
| **You are here:**OESE Home > Programs/Initiatives > OAI |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

Welcome! Thank you for visiting the Office of Academic Improvement (OAI) website. It is our desire to provide you with useful and timely information  that will enhance your knowledge of programs administered by OAI and of issues  that are important to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as reauthorized  by the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. 

- About Us
- Meet our Director
- Programs

U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Elementary and Secondary EducationOffice of Academic Improvement400 Maryland Avenue, SWWashington, DC 20202               Phone: 202-260-8228Fax: 202-260-8969e-mail: OESE@ed.gov
Table 2.1. Personal Income and Its Disposition 

[Billions of dollars] 

Bureau of Economic Analysis

Downloaded on 5/27/2011 At 2:17:42 PM Last Revised May 26, 2011 

1 2 3

 Line 2009 2010

1 Personal income 12174.9 12541

2 Compensation of employees, received 7806.7 7984.5

3 Wage and salary disbursements 6274.1 6398.9

4 Private industries 5100.5 5211.8

5 Government 1173.6 1187.1

6 Supplements to wages and salaries 1532.6 1585.6

7 Employer contributions for employee pension and insurance funds 1072 1106.8

8 Employer contributions for government social insurance 460.6 478.8

9 Proprietors' income with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments 1011.9 1055

10 Farm 30.5 44.9

11 Nonfarm 981.5 1010.1

12 Rental income of persons with capital consumption adjustment 274 300.9

13 Personal income receipts on assets 1919.7 1907.6

14 Personal interest income 1222.3 1194.9

15 Personal dividend income 697.4 712.7

16 Personal current transfer receipts 2132.8 2296.4

17 Government social benefits to persons 2096.8 2259

18 Old-age, survivors, disability, and health insurance benefits 1164.5 1213.9

19 Government unemployment insurance benefits 128.6 136.6

20 Veterans benefits 52.3 61.4

21 Family assistance\1\ 20.1 19.8

22 Other 731.3 827.4

23 Other current transfer receipts, from business (net) 36 37.4

24 Less: Contributions for government social insurance, domestic 970.3 1003.5

25 Less: Personal current taxes 1140 1166.3

26 Equals: Disposable personal income 11034.9 11374.7

27 Less: Personal outlays 10379.6 10720.7

28 Personal consumption expenditures 10001.3 10349.1

29 Personal interest payments\2\ 216.8 198.9

30 Personal current transfer payments 161.4 172.7

31 To government 95 100.8

32 To the rest of the world (net) 66.5 71.9

33 Equals: Personal saving 655.3 653.9

34 Personal saving as a percentage of disposable personal income 5.9 5.7

 Addenda:

35 Personal income excluding current transfer receipts, billions of chained (2005) dollars\3\ 9191.1 9219.6

 Disposable personal income:

36 Total, billions of chained (2005) dollars\3\ 10099.8 10236.6

 Per capita:

37 Current dollars 35888 36680

38 Chained (2005) dollars 32847 33010

39 Population (midperiod, thousands) 307483 310106

 Percent change from preceding period:

40 Disposable personal income, current dollars 0.7 3.1

41 Disposable personal income, chained (2005) dollars 0.6 1.4

1. Consists of aid to families with dependent children and, beginning with 1996,
 assistance programs operatingunder the Personal Responsibility and Work 

 Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.

2. Consists of nonmortgage interest paid by households.

3. The current-dollar measure is deflated by the implicit price deflator for