alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Second Additional Grand Jury of the County of Kings, Respondent, v. Aurelius Cirillo, Appellant.

In a proceeding by a Grand Jury under article 19 of the Judiciary Law (§ 750 *et seq.)*to adjudge a witness in criminal contempt of court, the witness appeals: (a) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 18, 1963, which granted the petitioner’s application to punish him for criminal contempt of court; and (b) from an order of said court, dated March 26, 1963, which adjudged him to be in criminal contempt of court and sentenced him to serve a term of 30 days in prison and to pay a fine of $250. Orders affirmed, without costs. The appellant’s conduct in persisting in his “ don’t remember ” answers before the Grand Jury justified, under the circumstances herein, the finding of a willful refusal to testify *(People ex rel. Cirillo*v. *Warden,*11 N Y 2d 51; *Matter of Second Additional Grand Jury*v. *Cirillo,*12 N Y 2d 206). On this record, it may not be said that the appellant has been denied due process. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995
included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          10,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,520
<PP&E>                                          28,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,994
<BONDS>                                         23,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,347
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,904
<SALES>                                         79,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,599
<CGS>                                           40,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,783
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,823
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  40,937
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,897
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.20
        

</TABLE>
1019.811-3 Contract clauses. ( d ) ( 3 ) Insert the clause at 1052.219-18, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Concerns—Alternate III (Deviation), for paragraph (c) of FAR 52.219-18, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Concerns, in all solicitations and contracts that exceed $100,000 and are processed under FAR 19.8.
( f ) Insert the clause at 1052.219-72, Section 8(a) Direct Awards, in solicitations and contracts that exceed $100,000 and are processed under FAR 19.8 for paragraph (c) of FAR 52.219-11, Special 8(a) Contract Conditions; FAR 52.219-12, Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions; and FAR 52.219-17, Section 8(a) Award.
[76 FR 42057, July 18, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 11596, Mar. 4, 2015]
2432.402 General. ( e ) ( 1 ) The determination and findings required by FAR 32.402(c)(1)(iii) shall be made by the HCA.
( 2 ) Each advance payment situation shall be coordinated with the head of the cognizant accounting office, before authorization may be given, to ensure that there are controls in place to assure proper administration of advance payments.
[60 FR 46157, Sept. 5, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 46097, Aug. 23, 1999]
#### 2415.507 Protests against award.

Protests against awards of negotiated procurements shall be processed in accordance with FAR subpart 33.1 and HUDAR subpart 2433.1

[50 FR 46578, Nov. 8, 1985. Redesignated at 61 FR 19471, May 1, 1996, and further redesignated at 64 FR 46096, Aug. 23, 1999]
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsFigure 1. Location of the 10 beach nourishment areas sampled in July and October 1994 and January and April 1995.
222.1305 Waivers. ( c ) Follow the procedures at PGI 222.1305(c) for submission of waiver requests.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Elizabeth Marro, Respondent, v. Sarah Cook, Doing Business as Cook’s Convalescent Home, et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Aulisi, J.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision directing the carrier to provide and pay for diagnostic medical tests. Claimant, a nursing home employee, was injured April 18, 1959, while lifting a patient. Dr. Selleck diagnosed her conditions as sacroiliac sprain and hemorrhagic cystitis, both causally related to her accident. He discharged her August 20, 1960, and she then treated with Dr. Sanford until December 17, 1960. The carrier paid for all expenses. On May 27, 1962, she returned to Dr. Sanford still complaining of back pains. Unable to determine her condition, he recommended hospital tests which the board has directed the carrier to provide. On the basis of the record as developed we cannot uphold the decision, There is no evidence that claimant’s present condition is causally related to her accident. The board obviously fastened upon Dr, Sanford’s testimony that claimant’s present symptoms were *compatible*with hemorrhagic cystitis, but this clearly was not sufficient opinion evidence to support the board’s finding. In fact, Dr. Sanford testified that the symptoms were also compatible with various other diseases. Absent any present medical opinion regarding diagnosis Or causal relation, we do not believe a carrier should be required to provide the medical tests to determine the condition and causal relation (see *Penn*v. *Standard Acc. Ins. Co.,*4 A D 2d 796). A different question, of course, will be presented if the tests, when made, link claimant’s condition to her employment. Decision reversed and case remitted, with costs to appellants against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Hamm, JJ., concur.
# C_2016367EN.01000101.xml

| 6.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 October 2016

(2016/C 367/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1211 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4417 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6260 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0959 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9872 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,028 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2941 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4621 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,4235 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4722 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4816 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6958 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5612 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5365 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 250,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4086 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4829 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5080 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 612,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6397 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,055 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,9836 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,020 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6374 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6129 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,6349 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1211

JPY

Japanese yen

115,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4417

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88155

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6260

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0959

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9872

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,028

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2941

RON

Romanian leu

4,4621

TRY

Turkish lira

3,4235

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4722

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4816

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6958

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5612

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5365

KRW

South Korean won

1 250,31

ZAR

South African rand

15,4086

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4829

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5080

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 612,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6397

PHP

Philippine peso

54,055

RUB

Russian rouble

69,9836

THB

Thai baht

39,020

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6374

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6129

INR

Indian rupee

74,6349

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
1509.507-1 Solicitation provisions. ( a ) *Advance notice of limitations.* The Contracting Officer shall alert prospective contractors by placing a notice in the solicitation whenever a particular acquisition might create an organizational conflict of interest. The notice will: ( 1 ) Include the information prescribed in FAR 9.507-1;
( 2 ) Refer prospective contractors to this subpart; and
( 3 ) Require proposers to disclose relevant facts concerning any past, present, or currently planned interests relating to the work described in the solicitation.
( b ) *Required solicitation provision.* The Contracting Officer shall include the provisions at 1552.209-70 and 1552.209-72 in all solicitations, except where the following applies: ( 1 ) An Organizational Conflict of Interest provision is drafted for a particular acquisition (see Section 1509.507-1(a));
( 2 ) When the procurement is with another Federal agency (however, the provision is included in solicitations issued under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program); and
( 3 ) When the procurement is accomplished through simplified acquisition procedures, use of the provision is optional.
[49 FR 8839, Mar. 8, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 59 FR 18619, Apr. 19, 1994; 61 FR 57337, Nov. 6, 1996; 62 FR 33572, June 20, 1997; 82 FR 33019, July 19, 2017]
227.674 Supply contracts between the Government and a foreign government or concern. In negotiating contract prices with a second source, including the redetermination of contract prices, or in determining the allowability of costs under a cost-reimbursement contract with a second source, the contracting officer: ( a ) Shall obtain from the second source a detailed statement (see FAR 27.204-1(a)(2)) of royalties, license fees, and other compensation paid or to be paid to a primary source (or any of his subcontractors) for patent rights, rights in data, and other technical assistance provided to the second source, including identification and description of such patents, data, and technical assistance; and
( b ) Shall not accept or allow charges which in effect are— ( 1 ) For royalties or amortization for patents or inventions in which the Government holds a royalty-free license; or
( 2 ) For data which the Government has a right to possess, use, and disclose to others; or
( 3 ) For any technical assistance provided to the second source for which the Government has paid under a contract between the Government and a primary source.
Case: 1:12-cv-01357 Document #: 27 Filed: 09/12/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:194
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 40261 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Mikedrion Lister,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:21

- CR

- 539

- 1

**____________________ __________**  Before **Barksdale, Engelhardt,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The district court revoked Mikedrion Lister ’s term of probation and sentenced him to 18

- months ’ imprisonment. Lister contends

— and the Government agrees

— th at th e written revocation judgment contains a clerical error. Lister and the Government seek a remand for correction of the judgment under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 3, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40261 Document: 00516956115 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023No. 23

- 40261

2 Rule 36 states: “ A fter giving any notice it considers appropriate, the court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission ”

. **Fed. R. Crim. P.** 36. This rule applies “[w] here the record makes it clear that an issue was actually litigated and decided but was incorrectly recorded in or inadvertently omitted from the judgment ”

. United States v. Cooper , 979 F.3d 1084, 1089 (5th Cir. 2020) (citation omitt ed).
T he district court’s written judgment contains a clerical error. At the revocation hearing, the court explicitly found, inter alia , that the Government failed to “establish” Lister violated the terms of his supervision by possessing or using a controlled substance. Nevertheless, the written judgment states Lister was found guilty of violating the condition prohibiting possessing or using a controlled substance (“Violation Numb er 1” in the written judgment)

. In other words, the written judgment “incorrectly recorded” how the controlled

- substance violation was resolved at the revocation hearing. Id. (citation omitted). Accordingly, the clerical error in the written judgment is subject to correction under Rule 36.
**AFFIRMED ;**  **REMANDED** to correct th e clerical error in the judgment

. Case: 23-40261 Document: 00516956115 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/03/2023
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">East Village RE Holdings LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Kelly McGowan, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant, -and- Hamid Razik, Respondent-Undertenant-Respondent, -and- John Doe and Jane Doe, Respondents-Undertenants.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Michael L. Weisberg, J.), dated September 19, 2016, which granted tenant's preanswer motion to dismiss the petition in a holdover summary proceeding, and denied, as moot, landlord's cross motion for leave to conduct discovery and for payment of interim use and occupancy.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Michael L. Weisberg, J.), dated September 19, 2016, modified by denying tenant's motion, reinstating the petition, and remanding the matter to Civil Court for further proceedings consistent with this decision; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs to tenant-appellant. </p><p>Tenant's preanswer motion to dismiss this illegal sublet holdover proceeding should have been denied. Landlord has stated a cause of action for possession based upon the rent stabilized tenant's alleged assignment or sublet of the premises without permission (<a href="../2017/2017_50663.htm" target="_blank"><i>see 539 W 156, L.L.C. v Hernandez</i>, 55 Misc 3d 144</a>[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50663[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2017]).</p><p>The notice to cure, which was incorporated by reference in the notice of termination, was reasonable in view of the attendant circumstances, as it fairly stated the nature of landlord's claim and the facts necessary to establish the existence of grounds for eviction (<a href="../2007/2007_04875.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Oxford Towers Co., LLC v Leites</i>, 41 AD3d 144</a>, 144-145 [2007]), by alleging, <i>inter alia</i>, that tenant was living at a specified address other than the subject apartment and had breached a substantial obligation of her tenancy by unlawfully subletting or assigning the premises to an individual named Hamid <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>Razik, without landlord's consent and in violation of Real Property Law § 226-b and Rent Stabilization Law §§ 2524.3[a]and 2524.3[h] (<a href="../2017/2017_50664.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Amin Mgt LLC v Martinez</i>, 55 Misc 3d 144</a>[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50664[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2017]; <i>Perle v Ross</i>, 150 Misc 2d 20 [1991]).  </p><p>In reinstating the petition, we do not pass upon the landlord's application for leave to conduct discovery and for payment of interim use and occupancy, matters not reached below. Our disposition is without prejudice to the landlord's right to renew its application for such relief in the Civil Court (<i>see West Waverly Equities Group v Lieff</i>, 190 Misc 2d 280 [2001]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concurI concurI concur<br>Decision Date: November 29, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
OSERS is under the supervision of the Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services and the Secretary of Education. The Assistant Secretary serves as the principal adviser to the Secretary on Departmental matters related to special education and rehabilitative services and provides overall direction, coordination and leadership to the following major elements:
      -  Office of the Assistant Secretary (OAS) 
      -  Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) 
      -  Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) 

### Key Staff:

**Assistant Secretary:***Glenna Wright-Gallo*

**Deputy Assistant Secretary:***Katherine Neas*

----

### OSERS Navigation

About OSERS | People and Offices | Programs and ProjectsGrants and Funding | Legislation and Policy | Publications, Products, Research and StatisticsAdditional Resources | Contact and Feedback
217.700 Scope of subpart. This subpart— ( a ) Implements section 854 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Pub. L. 108-375), section 801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Pub. L. 110-181), and section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84); and
( b ) Prescribes policy for the acquisition of supplies and services through the use of contracts or orders issued by non-DoD agencies.
22.202 Contract clause. Insert the clause at 52.222-3, Convict Labor, in solicitations and contracts above the micro-purchase threshold, when the contract will be performed in the United States, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin Islands; unless— ( a ) The contract will be subject to 41 U.S.C. chapter 65(see subpart 22.6), which contains a separate prohibition against the employment of convict labor;
( b ) The supplies or services are to be purchased from Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (see subpart 8.6); or
( c ) The acquisition involves the purchase, from any State prison, of finished supplies that may be secured in the open market or from existing stocks, as distinguished from supplies requiring special fabrication.
[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34758, July 3, 1995; 61 FR 31644, June 20, 1996; 68 FR 28082, May 22, 2003; 79 FR 24203, Apr. 29, 2014; 85 FR 27091, May 6, 2020]
### How to Apply for Funding: HEERF  II-Proprietary Institutions  (CFDA 84.425Q)

*Note: Application is **required**for all  Proprietary Institutions, regardless of whether an institution received CARES  Act HEERF awards.*

- Instructions for Application
- Grants.gov  Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants 
- How to upload a Workspace  Training Resources for Grants.gov  Applicant  Overview Training for Grants.gov   Letter from the Acting Assistant Secretary (January 14, 2021)  Notice Inviting Applications: (a)(4) Proprietary Institutions Grant Funds for Students (CFDA 84.425Q)  *Note: The Grants.gov Funding  Opportunity Number listed in this NIA is ****incorrect****. The  correct funding number is **ED-GRANTS-011521-005**. The Department  published a correction notice to the Federal Register on January 22, 2021  addressing this error.*  Certification & Agreement: (a)(4) Proprietary Institutions Grant Funds for Students (CFDA 84.425Q) (Red C&A)    Formula allocations    -  Allocations for Section 314(a)(4) of CCRSAA
  -   Methodology for Calculating Allocations  Frequently Asked Questions    - (a)(4) Frequently Asked Questions  (Issued January 14, 2021, revised March 19, 2021)        Return to the CRRSAA HEERF II Website here.            Last Modified: 03/30/2021
TS-ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d 

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter 
Attachment #4

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter

TS-ACET10/20/30/40/50