alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.6

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.

In connection with the annual report of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, SLI Acquisition Corp., Spectrum Europe B.V. and Spectrum
Chromatography (collectively, the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), Roy T. Eddleman, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: March 27, 2003


/s/ Roy T. Eddleman
-------------------------------------


Roy T. Eddleman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.
#### 225.7017-2 Restriction.

In accordance with section 846 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Pub. L. 111-383), photovoltaic devices provided under any covered contract shall comply with 41 U.S.C. chapter 83, Buy American, subject to the exceptions to that statute provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501 *et seq.*).

[83 FR 62500, Dec. 4, 2018]
#### 215.404-71 Weighted guidelines method.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 985 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 985

 To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from revising the approved 
    oil and gas leasing program for fiscal years 2017 through 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2017

Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Booker, Mr. 
 Blumenthal, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Hassan, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
  Franken, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Warren, Mr. Cardin, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. 
 Nelson, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Reed, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Harris, 
and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from revising the approved 
    oil and gas leasing program for fiscal years 2017 through 2022.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REVISING APPROVED 2017-2022 OIL AND GAS 
              LEASING PROGRAM.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall not revise the approved oil and 
gas leasing program for the period of fiscal years 2017 through 2022 
prepared under section 18 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 
U.S.C. 1344) and described in the document entitled ``2017-2022 Outer 
Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program'' and 
dated November 2016.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") of Colorado Wyoming Reserve Company (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2004, Kim Fuerst, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 29, 2005

/s/ Kim Fuerst



Kim Fuerst



Chief Executive Officer
#### Mildred Frankel et al., v. Theodore J. Hamm.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. The stay contained in the order to show cause, dated November 14, 1960, is continued pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. Concur—-Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
U

.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

### MAR 

## 312015
Ms. Barbara Baillie Senior Certification Engineer Greenpoint Technologies, Inc. 4600 Carillon Point Kirkland, Washington 98033 Dear Ms. Baillie: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W

. Renton, Washington 98057-3356

We have received your petition letter dated March 13, 2015, requesting a partial exemption from§ 25.807(f)(4) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations, and from Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 109 paragraph 7(a), for a Boeing Model 787-8 airplane, serial number 35309. This exemption, ifgranted, would allow the exit distance to be increased from 30 feet to 37 feet on the right side ofthe airplane for the four forward-most seats in the lounge area. Green point proposes a decrease in the distance to the exit onthe left side ofthe airplane for those same seats from 30 feet to 21 feet. You stated that this is necessary due to deactivation ofthe door 2 right hand. This request was posted to the Department ofTransportation's Federal Docket Management System (at Regulations.gov) on March 17, 2015, and has been assigned DocketNo. FAA2015-0668. We are in the process ofreviewing your request. We will contact you ifwe need additional information. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Mr. JeffGardlin at (425) 227-2136, or by e-mail at Jeff
.Gardlin@faa.gov. Sincerely,

DeanaM. Stedman Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service



## COPY OF ORIGINAL
#### Kathleen Yeackel, Respondent, v Richard Lindstead, Appellant.

—Appeal from an order of Family Court of Saratoga County, entered March 8, 1978, which granted petitioner’s motion for an increase in support payments. Petitioner sought additional child support of $20 for a child who had formerly resided with appellant and was supported by him pursuant to a written stipulation entered into between the parties and which child is now residing with the petitioner. On appeal it is contended that the court erred in failing to consider appellant’s ability to pay along with the mother’s change in circumstances. We find no merit in this contention. Support provisions of an agreement will normally not be disturbed. To justify an increase beyond what is specified in a separation agreement there must be shown unforeseen change in circumstances and a concomitant showing of need *(Matter of Boden v Boden,*42 NY2d 210, 213). The record supports such a finding. The increased support reflects a consideration of the respective financial circumstances of the parties as well as the needs of the child. Order affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
No. 89-1012.

#### Fiorella et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 28 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of S. 782. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2017 

Mr. CORNYN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of S. 782. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 782, the 

3 Secretary of the Senate shall make the following correc4 tions: 

5 (1) In section 2, strike ‘‘42 U.S.C. 17601 et 

6 seq.’’ and insert ‘‘34 U.S.C. 21101 et seq.’’. 

7 (2) In section 2, strike ‘‘42 U.S.C. 

8 17617(a)(10)’’ and insert ‘‘34 U.S.C. 

9 21117(a)(10)’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
April 7, 1975.

C. A. No. 73-278.

#### State *v.*John Euart.

No cause having been shown in response to the order entered on February 20, *9441975 the appeal of defendant, John Euart, is dismissed.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Andrew A. Bücci,*for defendant.
PEKlNAREACHAttaeR^FCOMMEftCE y--p\^^^< 

rekin Area 

Ihamberof 

ommerce >. ^m^ 

March 12,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2010-1 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to 

compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy -

first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for fiirther 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to 

deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will 

have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and 

pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having 

three competitive air alliances to choose from. 

1 lu^ge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

William T. Fleminj 

Executive Director 

Pekin Area Chamber of Commerce • 402 Court Street • P.O. Box 636 • Pekin, IL 61555-0636 • Phone 309-346-2106 • Fax 309-346-2104 • E-Mail: chamber@pekin.net
#### Anderson *v.*Sheffield *et al.*

March 11, 1913.

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Sheppard. Tattnall superior court. August 20, 1912.

*H. H. Elders,*for plaintiff in error.

*Way & Burkhalter,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

The evidence introduced before the ordinary, on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus brought for the purpose of determining the custody of a minor child, was conflicting; and there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the judge of the superior court in sustaining a writ of certiorari to the judgment of the ordinary, and remanding the case for another trial. *Buice*v. *Buice,*111 *Ga.*887 (36 S. E. 969).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 171 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Travel and Tourism Week and 

honoring the valuable contributions of travel and tourism to the United 

States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2017 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. SCHATZ, and Mr. HELLER) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Travel and Tourism Week and honoring the valuable contributions of 

travel and tourism to the United States. 

Whereas National Travel and Tourism Week was established 

in 1983 through the enactment of the Joint Resolution 

entitled ‘‘Joint Resolution to designate the week beginning May 27, 1984, as ‘National Tourism Week’ ’’, approved November 29, 1983 (Public Law 98–178; 97 Stat. 

1126), which recognized the value of travel and tourism; 

Whereas National Travel and Tourism Week is celebrated 

across the United States from May 7 through May 13, 

2017; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 171 ATS 

Whereas more than 400 celebrations throughout the United 

States are scheduled in honor of National Travel and 

Tourism Week; 

Whereas 1 out of every 9 jobs in the United States depends 

on travel and tourism and the travel and tourism industry supports 15,300,000 jobs in the United States; 

Whereas the travel and tourism industry employs individuals 

in all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and all the territories of the United States; 

Whereas international travel to the United States— 

(1) is the single largest export industry in the 

United States; and 

(2) generates a trade surplus balance of approximately $87,000,000,000; 

Whereas the travel and tourism industry, Congress, and the 

President have worked to streamline the visa process and 

make the United States welcoming to visitors from other 

countries; 

Whereas travel and tourism provide significant economic benefits to the United States by generating nearly 

$2,300,000,000,000 in annual economic output; 

Whereas leisure travel allows individuals to experience the 

rich cultural heritage and educational opportunities of 

the United States and its communities; and 

Whereas the immense value of travel and tourism cannot be 

overstated: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Travel and Tourism Week; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 171 ATS 

1 (2) commends the travel and tourism industry 

2 for its important contributions to the United States; 

3 and 

4 (3) commends the employees of the travel and 

5 tourism industry for their important contributions to 

6 the United States. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### 229.170-1 Definition.

*Commodities,* as used in this section, means any materials, articles, supplies, goods, or equipment.

[70 FR 57192, Sept. 30, 2005]
#### 239.7601 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Authorizing official,* as described in DoD Instruction 8510.01, Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT), means the senior Federal official or executive with the authority to formally assume responsibility for operating an information system at an acceptable level of risk to organizational operations (including mission, functions, image, or reputation), organizational assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation.

*Cloud computing* means a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (*e.g.,* networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction. This includes other commercial terms, such as on-demand self-service, broad network access, resource pooling, rapid elasticity, and measured service. It also includes commercial offerings for software-as-a-service, infrastructure-as-a-service, and platform-as-a-service.

*Government data* means any information, document, media, or machine readable material regardless of physical form or characteristics, that is created or obtained by the Government in the course of official Government business.

*Government-related data* means any information, document, media, or machine readable material regardless of physical form or characteristics that is created or obtained by a contractor through the storage, processing, or communication of Government data. This does not include a contractor's business records (*e.g.,* financial records, legal records, etc.) or data such as operating procedures, software coding, or algorithms that are not uniquely applied to the Government data.

*Information system* means a discrete set of information resources organized for the collection, processing, maintenance, use, sharing, dissemination, or disposition of information.

*Media* means physical devices or writing surfaces including, but not limited to, magnetic tapes, optical disks, magnetic disks, large-scale integration memory chips, and printouts onto which information is recorded, stored, or printed within an information system.

[80 FR 51743, Aug. 26, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 72999, Oct. 21, 2016]
225.870-1 General. ( a ) The Canadian government guarantees to the U.S. Government all commitments, obligations, and covenants of the Canadian Commercial Corporation under any contract or order issued to the Corporation by any contracting office of the U.S. Government. The Canadian government has waived notice of any change or modification that may be made, from time to time, in these commitments, obligations, or covenants.
( b ) For production planning purposes, Canada is part of the defense industrial base (see 225.870-2(b)).
( c ) The Canadian Commercial Corporation will award and administer contracts with contractors located in Canada, except for— ( 1 ) Negotiated acquisitions for experimental, developmental, or research work under projects other than the Defense Development Sharing Program;
( 2 ) Acquisitions of unusual or compelling urgency;
( 3 ) Acquisitions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold; or
( 4 ) Acquisitions made by DoD activities located in Canada.
( d ) For additional information on production rights, data, and information; services provided by Canadian Commercial Corporation; audit; and inspection, see PGI 225.870-1(d).
[68 FR 15621, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 73154, Dec. 9, 2005; 77 FR 43472, July 24, 2012]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 49076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19690]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

National Electric Transmission Congestion Study

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Public Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (Department) invites public comment 
on the draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 20, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The draft study is available for review at http://www.energy.gov/node/942311. Written comments may be submitted 
electronically to Congestionstudy.comments@hq.doe.gov. Written comments 
may also be delivered by conventional mail to David Meyer, Office of 
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy, 
1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585. Commenters are 
cautioned, however, that all conventional mail to the Department is 
subject to an automatic security screening process that may take up to 
three weeks and sometimes renders mailed material illegible.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Meyer, at 
David.Meyer@hq.doe.gov, or telephone 202-586-1411.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 
2005, codified at 16 U.S.C. 824p(a), directs the Secretary of Energy to 
conduct an electric transmission congestion study every three years, 
and to prepare it in consultation with affected states and regional 
reliability organizations. In the study, the Department seeks to 
provide information about transmission congestion by focusing on 
specific indications of transmission constraints and congestion and 
their consequences. The study focuses on a specific time frame--i.e., 
historical trends over the past few years, and looking forward three to 
five years. The study is based entirely on publicly available data and 
transmission-related documents.
    The draft study is available for review at http://www.energy.gov/node/942311. All comments received will be made publicly available on 
http://www.energy.gov/node/942311. After reviewing and considering the 
public comments, the Department will prepare and release a final 
version of the study.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on August 14, 2014.
Patricia A. Hoffman,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy 
Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2014-19690 Filed 8-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                           CALIFORNIA MICROWAVE, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    DECEMBER 31,
                                                              ------------------------
                                                                1996            1995
                                                              --------         -------
        <S>                                                   <C>              <C>
        PRIMARY - EPS:
        Net income (loss), as reported......................  $(25,395)        $ 3,648
                                                              ========         =======
        Average shares outstanding..........................    16,145          15,852
        Add -- Common stock equivalents of Company's stock
          options using the treasury stock method...........        --             277
                                                              --------         -------
        Average shares and equivalents -- Primary...........    16,145          16,129
                                                              ========         =======
        Net income per share -- Primary.....................  $  (1.57)        $   .23
                                                              ========         =======
</TABLE>
 
                                       14