alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11

CASCADE CORPORATION        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE        (Unauditedin thousands except per share data)

|                                                                |  | Three Months Ended October 31
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|
|
|Net income                                                      |  | $                            
|Less: preferred stock dividend                                  |  |                              
|                                                                |  |                              
|BASIC EPS                                                       |  |                              
|Income available to common shareholders                         |  |                              
|                                                                |  |                              
|Effect of dilutive securities                                   |  |                              
|Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock              |  |                              
|                                                                |  |                              
|DILUTED EPS                                                     |  |                              
|Income available to common shareholder plus assumed conversions |  | $                            
|                                                                |  |                              

|                                                                |  | Nine Months Ended October 31
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|
|
|Net income                                                      |  | $                           
|Less: preferred stock dividend                                  |  |                             
|                                                                |  |                             
|BASIC EPS                                                       |  |                             
|Income available to common shareholders                         |  |                             
|                                                                |  |                             
|Effect of dilutive securities                                   |  |                             
|Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock              |  |                             
|                                                                |  |                             
|DILUTED EPS                                                     |  |                             
|Income available to common shareholder plus assumed conversions |  | $                           
|                                                                |  |                             

---

QuickLinks
#### 252.223-7009 Prohibition of Procurement of Fluorinated Fire-Fighting Agent for Use on Military Installations.

As prescribed in 223.7404, use the following clause:

# Prohibition of Procurement of Fluorinated Fire-Fighting Agent for Use on Military Installations (MAR 2024)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause, *perfluoroalkyl substances* and *polyfluoroalkyl substances* have the meanings given in section 322(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Pub. L. 116-92).

(b) *Prohibition.* The Contractor shall not provide or use under this contract any fire-fighting agent that contains perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances in excess of one part per billion.

(c) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts, including subcontracts for commercial products and commercial services, relating to fire-fighting on a military installation.

(End of clause)

[89 FR 20871, Mar. 26, 2024]
#### In the Matter of James R. Dumpson, as Commissioner of Welfare of the City of New York, Respondent, v. William (Paellides) Pavlou, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to amend and clarify the decision and order of this court rendered April 12, 1962. The amendment is sought with respect to the corporate undertaking for $1,000 which this court directed appellant to file as a condition to the granting of his motion for a stay of the order appealed from *936
      *dated*January 24, 1962. Appellant in effect now asks that until the *determination*of the appeal he should not be required to pay the amount directed to be paid by said order appealed from, and that the undertaking should be allowed to stand simply as security for such payments in the event the order be affirmed. Motion denied. On the court’s own motion, its decision of April 12,1962 (16 A D 2d 671) is amended to read as follows: Motion by appellant for a stay of the enforcement of a support order pending appeal therefrom, granted on condition that, within 10 days after entry of the order hereon, appellant shall file an undertaking for $1,000, with corporate surety, that during the pendency of such appeal he will pay the amount directed to be paid (by said order) to the Family Court Division, Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Queens County, for the support of Elizabeth Paellides, the person in whose behalf this proceeding is being prosecuted. Such undertaking shall be deemed to be security for the payment to the Family Court Clerk of all arrears under the order appealed from and for the further payment of all sums as they become due under said order pending the determination of the appeal; and upon appellant’s default in the making of any such payments the stay shall be deemed to be suspended. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### 252.209-7003 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended July 3, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

August 16, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                  ------------


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Charles W. Fischer,  President and Chief Executive Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian Corporation (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
     on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
     Company.



Date:    July 14, 2006                    /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Charles W. Fischer
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
#### 232.671 Bankruptcy reporting.

Follow the procedures at PGI 232.671 for bankruptcy reporting.

[70 FR 75413, Dec. 20, 2005]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Jeff Foster,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

PNC Bank, National Association,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2012 cv 3130

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

MOTION TO APPOINT SELLING OFFICER

NOW COMES the Counter-Plaintiff, PNC Bank, National Association, by and through its

attorneys and moves the Court for the entry of an order appointing Intercounty Judicial Sales

Corporation as Selling Officer pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/15-1506(f)(3) and 28 U.S.C. Section 2001

(a). .

If the Counter-Plaintiff chooses to utilize a marketing platform for the subject property, the

Counter-Plaintiff is authorized to engage an independent contractor to implement a national

marketing platform to reach a larger market for potential third party bidders. The marketing

platform shall include providing sale information on a national website, direct-mail advertising,

print media marketing, radio marketing, and localized advertising in specific communities. All

costs for the additional services provided by the independent marketing contractor shall be borne

by the Counter-Plaintiff or the independent marketing contractor. None of the additional costs

shall be borne by the Counter-Defendant(s). The independent marketing contractor waives any

potential lien rights it may have in the real estate regarding non-payment of the additional costs

borne by the Counter- Plaintiff.

Dated: May 19, 2020 PNC Bank, National Association

By:/s/ James M. Crowley

One of its Attorneys

Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 194 Filed: 05/19/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4177
Marcel C. Duhamel, Esq. (Ohio Bar No. 0062171 pro hac vice)

Lindsay Doss Spillman, Esq. (Ohio Bar No. 0086849 pro hac vice)

Vorys Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP

200 Public Square, Suite 1400

Cleveland, OH 44114

(216) 479-6100

mcduhamel@vorys.com

ldspillman@vorys.com

James M. Crowley, Esq. (ARDC 6182597)

John F. Sullivan, Esq. (ARDC 6205900)

Plunkett Cooney, PC

221 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1550

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 670-6900

jcrowley@plunkettcooney.com

jsullivan@plunkettcooney.com

Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 194 Filed: 05/19/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4178
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

New York State Education Department89 Washington AvenueAlbany, NY 12234Phone: (518) 474-3852Website: http://www.nysed.gov/

### State Higher Education Agency

New York State Higher Education Services Corporation99 Washington AvenueAlbany, NY 12255Phone: (518) 473-1574Toll-Free: (888) 697-4372Website: http://www.hesc.ny.gov/Special Education Agency
P-12: Office of Special EducationNew York State Education Department89 Washington Avenue, Room 309 EBOne Commerce PlazaAlbany, NY 12234Phone: (518) 474-3852Website: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/
State Adult Education Agency
Adult Education Programs and Policy (AEPP)The New York State Education Department 89 Washington Avenue, Room 460 EBA Albany, NY 12234 Phone: (518) 474-8940 Fax: (518) 486-1751 Website: http://www.acces.nysed.gov/aepp/

Back to state map
  Last Modified: 03/24/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

RG INVESTMENTS GROUP, INC., ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-04179 

) 

v. ) 

) Judge Gary Feinerman 

DOES 1 – 143, ) 

) Magistrate Judge Susan E. Fox 

Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DOE DEFENDANTS 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), 

Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses, without prejudice, all causes of action in the Complaint against certain 

Doe Defendants associated with the IP Addresses in the accompanying Exhibit – specifically, Doe 

Defendants 118 (IP Address 68.58.55.198) through 143 (IP Address 76.217.59.135), inclusive. [The 

accompanying Exhibit comprises pages 4 and 5 of Exhibit B to the First Amended Complaint.]. The 

respective Doe Defendants have neither filed an answer nor any motion with regard to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint. A dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) is therefore appropriate. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: July 27, 2012 RG INVESTMENTS GROUP, INC. 

 By: s/ Michael A. Hierl 

 Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021) 

 Todd S. Parkhurst (Bar No. 2145456) 

 Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. 

 Three First National Plaza 

 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000 

 Chicago, Illinois 60602 

 (312) 580-0100 Telephone 

 (312) 580-1994 Facsimile 

 mhierl@hsplegal.com 

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 RG Investments Group, Inc. 

Case: 1:12-cv-04179 Document #: 9 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:40
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 260 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 260

       Designating September 2017 as ``School Bus Safety Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2017

   Mrs. Fischer (for herself and Mr. Booker) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating September 2017 as ``School Bus Safety Month''.

Whereas, every school day in the United States, approximately 500,000 public and 
        private school buses carry more than 26,000,000 children to and from 
        school;
Whereas school buses comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the 
        United States;
Whereas 55 percent of all K-12 students ride a school bus, totaling 260,000,000 
        miles for each of the 180 school days in a year, or 46,800,000,000 miles 
        driven annually;
Whereas the Child Safety Network, celebrating 28 years of national public 
        service, supports the CSN Safe Bus campaign, which is designed to 
        provide the latest technology and free safety and security resources to 
        the school bus industry;
Whereas the designation of School Bus Safety Month will allow broadcast and 
        digital media and social networking industries to make commitments to 
        disseminate public service announcements that are produced in order to--

    (1) provide resources designed to safeguard children; and

    (2) recognize school bus drivers and professionals;

Whereas key leaders who are deserving of recognition during School Bus Safety 
        Month and beyond have provided security awareness training materials to 
        more than 14,000 public and private school districts, trained more than 
        80,000 school bus operators, and provided more than 80,000 
        counterterrorism guides to individuals who are key to providing both 
        safety and security for children in the United States; and
Whereas School Bus Safety Month offers the Senate and the people of the United 
        States an opportunity to recognize and thank all of the school bus 
        drivers in the United States and the professionals who are focused on 
        school bus safety and security: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates September 2017 as ``School Bus 
Safety Month''.
                                 <all>
```
247.101 Policies. ( h ) *Shipping documents covering f.o.b. origin shipments.* ( i ) Procedures for the contractor to obtain bills of lading are in the clause at 252.247-7028, Application for U.S. Government Shipping Documentation/Instructions.
( ii ) The term “commercial bills of lading” includes the use of any commercial form or procedure.
[77 FR 39140, June 29, 2012]
December 19, 1974.

M. P. No. 74-261.

#### Michelle Ziobro *et al. Individually and as parent and next friend of Michelle Ziobro v.*Guerrino W. Palumbo *et al.*

*Roberts & Willey, Bruce G. Tucker,*for plaintiffs. *Keenan, Rice, Dolan, Reardon & Kiernan, Frederick A. Reardon,*for defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

Motion of plaintiffs for reconsideration of court’s order granting certiorari and quashing order adding the insurance company as a party defendant is denied without prejudice to the right of plaintiffs to raise the issue on appeal.

Roberts, C. J. not participating.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed September 11, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00571

- CV

DAVID ARTHUR , Appellant

V.

ANGELA LAFRANCES EVA NS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS , Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 00162

- 2014



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices O’Neill, Lang

- Miers, and Brown Opinion by Justice O’Neill

Stating he no longer desires to prosecute the appeal, appellant has filed a motion for

voluntary dismissal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal. See id.

140571F.P05 /Michael J. O'Neill/
MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVID ARTHUR, Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 00571

- CV V.

ANGELA LAFRANCES EVANS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6, Collin Cou nty, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 00162

- 2014. Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. Justices Lang

- Miers and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees Angela LaFrances Evans and all other occupants recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant David Arthur.

Judgment entered this 11th day of September, 2014.
85 So.2d 245

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby Dale RUSSELL.

No. 42674.

Jan. 16, 1956.

L. G. Campbell, Benton, for appellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard Kilbourne, Dist. Atty., Clinton, for appellee.

HAMITER, Justice.

For the" reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Monix, La., 85 So.2d 243,1 on the docket of this court and this day decided by us, the herein issued writ of certiorari is vacated and the rule to show cause is discharged. .

1

. 229 La. 142.
Fourth Department,

August, 1964

(August 26, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Morris Garber, Appellant, v. Henry A. Fisselbrand et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Onondaga, et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. The respondent, Board of Elections, is directed to forthwith serve notice of a drawing for a position on the ballot by lot as required in subdivision 1 of section 104 of the Election Law, the said drawing to be held not later than Monday, August 31, 1964. Memorandum: Subdivision 1 of section 104 of the Election Law has not been amended by the Legislature since the amendment of section 1 of article I of the State Constitution, effective January 1, 1960, authorizing the Legislature to provide that there shall be no primary election in the absence of a contest. Under the facts here presented, it is not necessary to pass upon the question as to whether in the absence of such a contest a demand for determination of position by lot shall be made upon notice of two days or a longer period (Election Law, § 104, subd. 1). (Appeal by petitioner from order of Onondaga Special Term, dismissing the petition.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
237.503 Agency-head responsibilities. ( c ) The agency head or designee shall employ procedures to ensure that requirements for service contracts are vetted and approved as a safeguard to prevent contracts from being awarded or administered in a manner that constitutes an unauthorized personal services contract. Contracting officers shall follow the procedures at PGI 237.503, include substantially similar certifications in conjunction with service contract requirements, and place the certification in the contract file. The program manager or other official responsible for the requirement, at a level specified by the agency, should execute the certification. In addition, contracting officers and program managers should remain aware of the descriptive elements at FAR 37.104(d) to ensure that a service contract does not inadvertently become administered as a personal-services contract.
[76 FR 25566, May 5, 2011]
DOCUMENT REMOVED DUE TO REASON[S ] CHECKED BELOW 

DOCUMENT ENTERED IN ERROR 

DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN/REMOVED PER COURT ORDER OF 

__________________. 

INCORRECT DOCUMENT LINKED 

OTHER 

REMOVED PER IOP 30(b)

Case: 1:12-cv-04249 Document #: 143 Filed: 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2668
#### 252.225-7029 Acquisition of Uniform Components for Afghan Military or Afghan National Police.

As prescribed in 225.7703-4(d), use the following clause:

# Acquisition of Uniform Components for Afghan Military or Afghan National Police (SEP 2013)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

“Textile component” means any item consisting of fibers, yarns, or fabric, supplied for incorporation into a uniform or a component of a uniform. It does not include items that do not contain fibers, yarns, or fabric, such as the metallic or plastic elements of buttons, zippers, or other clothing fasteners.

“United States” means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.

(b) As required by section 826 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Pub. L. 112-239), the Contractor shall deliver under this contract only textile components that have been produced in the United States.

(c) There are no exceptions or waivers to this requirement.

(End of clause)

[78 FR 59859, Sept. 30, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 11342, Feb. 28, 2014]
#### The People of the State of New York v. Louis Levine.

Enlargement of time granted. Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
251.202 Authorization. ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) See FAR 28.307-2(c) for policy on contractor insurance.
( B ) See FAR 28.308 for policy on self-insurance.
( C ) See FAR 31.205-19 for allowability of insurance costs.
( 5 ) Paragraph (d) of the clause at 252.251-7001 satisfies the requirement of FAR 51.202(a)(5) for a written statement.