alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 194 

Designating June 15, 2017, as ‘‘World Elder Abuse Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2017 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. GRASSLEY, 

Mr. CASEY, Mr. COTTON, Mr. TILLIS, and Mrs. MCCASKILL) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating June 15, 2017, as ‘‘World Elder Abuse 

Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas the Federal Government estimates that more than 

1 in 10 persons over the age of 60 are victims of elder 

abuse each year; 

Whereas abuse, neglect, and exploitation of older adults in 

the United States goes unidentified and unreported due 

to an inability to report or a fear of reporting; 

Whereas only 1 in 14 cases of financial abuse of older adults 

is reported; 

Whereas at least $2,900,000,000 is taken from older adults 

each year due to financial abuse and exploitation; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 194 IS 

Whereas elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation have no 

boundaries and cross all racial, social, class, gender, and 

geographic lines; 

Whereas older adults who are abused are 3 times more likely 

to die earlier than older adults of the same age who are 

not abused; 

Whereas 1⁄2 of all older adults with dementia will experience 

abuse; 

Whereas providing unwanted medical treatment can be a 

form of elder abuse and exploitation; 

Whereas public awareness has the potential to increase the 

identification and reporting of elder abuse by the public, 

professionals, and victims, and can act as a catalyst to 

promote issue-based education and long-term prevention; 

Whereas private individuals and public agencies must work 

together on the Federal, State, and local levels to combat 

increasing occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation 

crime, and violence against vulnerable older adults and 

vulnerable adults, particularly in light of limited resources for vital protective services; and 

Whereas 2017 is the 12th anniversary of World Elder Abuse 

Awareness Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates June 15, 2017, as ‘‘World Elder 

3 Abuse Awareness Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes judges, lawyers, adult protective 

5 services professionals, law enforcement officers, long6 term care ombudsmen, social workers, health care 

7 providers, professional guardians, advocates for vicVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:46 Jun 15, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR194.IS SR194

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 194 IS 

1 tims, and other professionals and agencies for the 

2 efforts to advance awareness of elder abuse; and 

3 (3) encourages members of the public and pro4 fessionals who work with older adults to act as cata5 lysts to promote awareness and long-term prevention 

6 of elder abuse by reaching out to local adult protec7 tive services agencies, long-term care ombudsman 

8 programs, and the National Center on Elder Abuse, 

9 and by learning to recognize, detect, report, and re10 spond to elder abuse. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
225.7012-2 Waiver. The Secretary of Defense may waive this restriction, on a case-by-case basis, after certifying to the Armed Services and Appropriations Committees of Congress that— ( a ) Adequate U.S. supplies are not available to meet requirements on a timely basis; and
( b ) The acquisition must be made in order to acquire capability for national security purposes.
[68 FR 15627, Mar. 31, 2003]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 18 (Friday, January 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: 30-Day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) is seeking approval 
from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information 
collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act and OMB procedures, SBA is publishing this notice to allow all 
interested member of the public an additional 30 days to provide 
comments on the proposed collection of information.

DATES: Submit comments on or before March 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the information collection by title 
and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Agency Clearance 
Officer, Curtis Rich, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and SBA Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, 
(202) 205-7030 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88ebfdfafce1fba6fae1ebe0c8fbeae9a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a594f484e534914485359527a49585b145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Copies: You may obtain a copy of the information collection and 
supporting documents from the Agency Clearance Officer.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Small Business Administration Surety Bond 
Guarantee Program was created to encourage surety companies to provide 
bonding for small contractors. The information collected on the form 
from surety companies will be used to update the status of successfully 
completed contracts and to provide a final accounting of contractor and

Solicitation of Public Comments

    Comments may be submitted on (a) whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the agency to properly perform its 
functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are accurate; (c) whether 
there are ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
automated techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information.
    Title: Quarterly Contract Completion Report.
    OMB Control Number: 3245-0395.
    Description of Respondents: Surety companies.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 92.
    Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 92.

Curtis Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2021-01953 Filed 1-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 2452.215-71 Relative importance of technical evaluation factors to cost or price.

As prescribed in 2415.209(a)(2), insert the following provision:

# Relative Importance Of Technical Evaluation Factors To Cost Or Price (DEC 2012)

For the purposes of evaluating offers and the selection of the contractor or contractors under this solicitation, the relative merit of the offeror's technical proposal as evaluated in accordance with the technical evaluation factors listed herein shall be considered [*Contracting Officer insert one of the following:* “significantly more important than,” “approximately equal to,” or “significantly less important than”] cost or price. While the proposed cost or price will not be assigned a specific weight, it shall be considered a significant criterion in the overall evaluation of proposals.

[77 FR 73533, Dec. 10, 2012]
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT,L.L.C. 1717PENNSYLVANIAAVE.,N.W., 12THFLOOR WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 TEL: (202) 659-6600 FAX: (202) 659-6699

June 19, 2014



### Via regulations.gov and email

Robert Finamore Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Brett Kruger Acting Division Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 ZUCKERT SCOUTT & RA.SENBERGER L.L.P. 888 SEVENTEENTH ST., N.W., SUITE 700 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 TELE: (202) 298-8660 FAX: (202) 342-0683

Re: 

### Joint Application ofChina Eastern Airlines Corporation Ltd. and Virgin America Inc.; Dockets OST-2014-0107 and OST-2014-0108.

Dear Messrs. Finamore and Kruger:

We have polled the air carrier representatives on the attached service list regarding the above-captioned Application and received no objections. Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited consideration ofthis Application.

Very truly yours,

Counsel for Counsel for China Eastern Airlines Corporation Ltd. Virgin America Inc.

cc: All parties on attached service listCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I caused a copy ofthe foregoing letter to be served, this 19th day ofJune, 2014, via email transmission, on the following persons:

francis.heil@aa.com howard.kass@aa.com robert.wirick@aa.com sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com sametta.c.bamett@delta.com sllunsford@fedex.com sharon.pasley@fedex.com gbleopard@fedex.com jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines) kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com peter.beckett@polaraircargo.com dan.weiss@united.com gmutphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United Airlines) anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) urskr@state.gov esta.rosenberg@dot.gov brett.kruger@dot.gov john.s.duncan@faa.gov info@airlineinfo.com 

# Jola!o!:a:·
124 STAT. 1112 PUBLIC LAW 111–155—APR. 7, 2010 

Public Law 111–155 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To protect the integrity of the constitutionally mandated United States census 

and prohibit deceptive mail practices that attempt to exploit the decennial census. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Deceptive Census Look 

Alike Mailings Act’’. 

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR MAIL BEARING THE TERM ‘‘CENSUS’’ ON 

THE ENVELOPE OR OUTSIDE COVER OR WRAPPER. 

(a) MATTER SOLICITING PURCHASE OF A PRODUCT OR SERVICE.— 

Section 3001(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

‘‘; or which bears the term ‘census’ on the envelope or outside 

cover or wrapper’’ after ‘‘such matter by the Federal Government’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by redesignating subparagraphs (A), 

(B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively; 

(3) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively; 

(4) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(h)’’; and 

(5) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) In the case of matter bearing the term ‘census’ on the 

envelope or outside cover or wrapper, in addition to satisfying 

one of the exceptions contained in paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(B), or 

(1)(C), such envelope or outside cover or wrapper bears on its 

face an accurate return address including the name of the entity 

that sent such matter.’’. 

(b) MATTER SOLICITING INFORMATION OR CONTRIBUTION OF

FUNDS.—Section 3001(i) of title 39, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) by inserting, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

‘‘; or which bears the term ‘census’ on the envelope or outside 

cover or wrapper’’ after ‘‘such matter by the Federal Government’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by redesignating subparagraphs (A), 

(B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively; 

(3) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively; 

(4) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(i)’’; and 

(5) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) In the case of matter bearing the term ‘census’ on the 

envelope or outside cover or wrapper, in addition to satisfying 

39 USC 101 note. 

Prevent 

Deceptive Census 

Look Alike 

Mailings Act. 

Apr. 7, 2010 

[H.R. 4621] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
PUBLIC LAW 111–155—APR. 7, 2010 124 STAT. 1113 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4621: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Mar. 9, 10, considered and passed House. 

Mar. 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

one of the exceptions contained in paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(B), or 

(1)(C), such envelope or outside cover or wrapper bears on its 

face an accurate return address including the name of the entity 

that sent such matter.’’. 

Approved April 7, 2010. 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
#### 22.403 Statutory, Executive order, and regulatory requirements.
(November 24, 1964)

#### Duo Factors, Inc., Appellant, v. Trylon Specialties, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order, entered on January 17, 1964, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to abide the event, and, without prejudice to renewal of a motion for summary judgment. The complaint alleges that plaintiff Duo Factors, Inc. (Duo) and defendant Trylon Specialties,; Inc. (Trylon) entered into an accounts receivable financing agreement August 24, 1961, and refers to a copy thereof, Exhibit A, which is made a part of the complaint. Exhibit A referred to is dated August 24, 1963, and provides, *nter alia,*that Duo will advance “up to 73% of the net amounts.” All parties refer to some modification to advance up to 75% of the net amounts, but such provision does not appear in the record, and the agreement expressly provides that it is not to be modified orally. The attached agreement shows a higher rate of interest charged than agreed upon in the 1961 agreement. From the examination before trial of Leo Rabkin it appears that either 'Trylon, by Rabkin, agreed to the change or that Rabkin individually so agreed, or possibly both consented to the change. It is not clear on the record. The defendant Goldberg is sued as a guarantor of the agreement, but the guarantee attached to the complaint and read in support of the motion is *785dated August 24, 1962, and does not bear the signature of defendant Goldberg, though from the examination before trial of Goldberg it appears that he did sign some instrument of guarantee. There is also a claim by Goldberg that there was a limitation of responsibility as guarantor on moneys loaned of up to 75%, and advances were made up to 90%. The guarantee in the record provides up to 73% and that it “shall not be impaired by any modification as to which the parties to said agreement” may agree. We are left to speculate if the Goldberg guarantee is identical with that appearing in the record, and if the parties to the factoring agreement did agree to certain modifications. Also left unclear is whether the individual defendants knew that the oral modifications had been made or that advances up to 90% had been made, or participated in such modifications and advances, perhaps creating an estoppel to assert the provision barring oral modifications. There is also some question as to a payment or payments to Florabelle Flower Co., a company headed by a brother to the president of Duo, which allegedly were approved by Trylon. In short, while it may be that plaintiff, on proper papers, is entitled to summary judgment, we cannot on this record so determine. There are questions of fact to be resolved. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
#### 216.470 Other applications of award fees.

See PGI 216.470 for guidance on other applications of award fees.

[71 FR 39008, July 11, 2006]
--
September 23,2013 

From: Rich Heath 

To: Chip Cameron 

Good evening Chip, 

Here is the proposal I forwarded to you an John on September 10th. Can you tell me 

how this will be incorporated and considered for inclusion with the final regs to come 

from the process we adopted in preparation for the next session in October? 

Proposal: That GE programs in which fewer than fifty percent of program completers 

have used Title IV loans automatically be exempted from any further eligibility 

determinations under GE. 

Rationale: The central objective of the gainful employment metrics is to ensure that 

students do not incur loan obligations they cannot repay after completing their 

programs. Programs in which fewer than fifty percent of the completers do not borrow 

will by definition have a median federal loan debt of zero. This policy is consistent with 

the GE final regulation of June 2011. It was based on the sound policy that federal 

policies should encourage institutions to keep borrowing to a minimum. 

This policy could be implemented by ED cross referencing the IPEDS completion data 

(perhaps further sorted by institutions to ensure that discrete GE programs are 

considered) for GE programs with OSFA student aid data collected in NSLDS. 

From June 2011 regulation, comment review reflects the following: 

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/06/13/2011-13905/program-integritygainful-employment-debt-measures 

Finally, we are revising the regulations to provide that programs with a median loan debt 

of zero are meeting the measures. This clarification is a logical extension of the debt 

measures since programs with a median loan debt of zero are not placing any debt 

burden on the majority of their students.
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2014 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 6, 2014 | By:    | /s/ Joseph B. Armes                   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Joseph B. Armes                       |
|                         |        | Chairman of the Board                 |
|                         |        | President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
#### 208.7100 Authorization.

NASA is authorized by Public Law 85-568 to use the acquisition services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of DoD departments and agencies with their consent, with or without reimbursement, and on a similar basis to cooperate with the departments/agencies in the use of acquisition services, equipment, and facilities.
Top
#### 2401.103 Authority.

The HUDAR is prescribed under section 7(d) of the Department of HUD Act (42 U.S.C. 3535(d)), section 205(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 486(c)), the general authorization in FAR 1.301, and the Secretary's delegations of procurement authority.

[71 FR 2434, Jan. 13, 2006]
225.7004-5 Additional restrictions on anchor and mooring chain. ( a ) In accordance with section 8041 of the Fiscal Year 1991 DoD Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 101-511) and similar sections in subsequent DoD appropriations acts, do not acquire welded shipboard anchor and mooring chain, unless— ( 1 ) It is manufactured in the United States, including cutting, heat treating, quality control, testing, and welding (both forging and shot blasting process); and
( 2 ) The cost of the components manufactured in the United States exceeds 50 percent of the total cost of components.
( b ) The statute at 10 U.S.C. 4864 also restricts acquisition of welded shipboard anchor and mooring chain, when used as a component of a naval vessel; however, the Appropriations Act restriction described in paragraph (a) of this section takes precedence over the restriction of 10 U.S.C. 4864 cited in 225.7004-2(b)(6).
[89 FR 46814, May 30, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark A. Libratore, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberator Medical Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2.           The information contained in this Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 13, 2011

/s/ Mark A. LibratoreMark A. Libratore,President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
21.1


PHOTOMEDEX,
INC.


a
Delaware corporation





LIST OF
SUBSIDIARIES








Surgical
Laser Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.*





Surgical
Innovations & Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation*





SLT
Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation





SLT
Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation**





SLT
Rentals, Inc., a Delaware corporation**





Diversified
Properties and Equity Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation**





Laser
Analytics, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation**





Laser
Photonics, Inc., a Delaware corporation**








* Merged
into PhotoMedex, Inc. on November 18, 2004.





**
Inactive.
215.404-71-5 Cost efficiency factor. ( a ) This special factor provides an incentive for contractors to reduce costs. To the extent that the contractor can demonstrate cost reduction efforts that benefit the pending contract, the contracting officer may increase the prenegotiation profit objective by an amount not to exceed 4 percent of total objective cost (Block 20 of the DD Form 1547) to recognize these efforts (Block 29).
( b ) To determine if using this factor is appropriate, the contracting officer shall consider criteria, such as the following, to evaluate the benefit the contractor's cost reduction efforts will have on the pending contract: ( 1 ) The contractor's participation in Single Process Initiative improvements;
( 2 ) Actual cost reductions achieved on prior contracts;
( 3 ) Reduction or elimination of excess or idle facilities;
( 4 ) The contractor's cost reduction initiatives (e.g., competition advocacy programs, technical insertion programs, obsolete parts control programs, spare parts pricing reform, value engineering, outsourcing of functions such as information technology). Metrics developed by the contractor such as fully loaded labor hours (i.e., cost per labor hour, including all direct and indirect costs) or other productivity measures may provide the basis for assessing the effectiveness of the contractor's cost reduction initiatives over time;
( 5 ) The contractor's adoption of process improvements to reduce costs;
( 6 ) Subcontractor cost reduction efforts;
( 7 ) The contractor's effective incorporation of commercial products or commercial services and commercial processes; or
( 8 ) The contractor's investment in new facilities when such investments contribute to better asset utilization or improved productivity.
( c ) When selecting the percentage to use for this special factor, the contracting officer has maximum flexibility in determining the best way to evaluate the benefit the contractor's cost reduction efforts will have on the pending contract. However, the contracting officer shall consider the impact that quantity differences, learning, changes in scope, and economic factors such as inflation and deflation will have on cost reduction.
[67 FR 20692, Apr. 26, 2002, as amended at 67 FR 49255, July 30, 2002; 88 FR 6583, Jan. 31, 2023]