alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Charles W. Fischer,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian  Corporation (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission
     on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
     Company.



Date:  July 18, 2008                      /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                           ----------------------
                                           Charles W. Fischer
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017047EN.01000201.xml

| 14.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8060 — Abbott Laboratories/St Jude Medical)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 47/03)

On 23 November 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8060. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8060. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2017047EN.01000101.xml

| 14.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8336 — Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings/Marubeni/Metro Pacific Investments/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 47/01)

On 7 February 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8336. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8336. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Guidance documents represent the Department of Education’s (ED) current thinking on a topic. They do not create or confer any rights for or on any person and do not impose any requirements beyond those required under applicable law and regulations.

On January 18, 2007, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued the “Final Bulletin for Agency Good Guidance Practices,” (GGP Bulletin) which became effective July 24, 2007. The GGP Bulletin established definitions of the different types of guidance documents, and established requirements for agencies to follow in developing and issuing significant guidance documents. Click here to view the GGP Bulletin’s definitions of the different types of guidance, including the definition of “significant guidance document.”

ED follows the definition of “significant guidance document” set forth in the GGP Bulletin and ED’s list of significant guidance documents can be found at the following link: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/significant-guidance3.docx.

## Public Comment on Significant Guidance Documents

Each significant guidance document provides an e-mail link that allows members of the public to submit questions or comments, including requests that ED revise the significant guidance document. We will take public comments into account in the course of developing new guidance or modifying existing guidance. Generally, we will not be making the public comments publicly available or providing formal responses to individual comments; however, for economically significant guidance documents we will post public comments on regulations.gov and we will post a written response-to-comments.

## Complaints

If you have a complaint regarding an ED significant guidance document or believe an ED employee is not following the guidance requirements of OMB’s GGP Bulletin, please contact ED’s Office of the General Counsel, Division of Regulatory Services, at GGBcomplaints@ed.gov. In order to ensure proper processing of your complaint, please include the words "SIGNIFICANT GUIDANCE: [Insert name of significant guidance document]" in the subject line of your email message. ED will review requests, complaints, and questions to determine whether any action is warranted and, if so, what action.
Unassociated Document


     

    
      Addendum to the Loan
Agreement dated July 14, 2008

      


      Loan
Amount US$330,000

      


      This Addendum, dated July 15, 2008,
states additional term made between the Lender, EFT Biotech Holdings, Inc.,
located in City of Industry, CA and Yeuh-Chi Liu, borrower, located in City of
Industry, CA.  The loan is subject to the change of new
term.  The change of loan term explained in this Addendum is
incorporated into and made a part of the original loan agreement and promissory
note thereto.

      


      AUTHORITY AND LOAN

      


      In addition to the terms listed in this
section, the following term is being incorporated and referred to as part of
this section:

      


      -Both
Lender and Borrower agree that the Loan shall be repaid by December 15, 2009 in
full.

      


      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum has
been executed by the parties hereto.

      


       

      
        
          	
                  Lender

                	
                  Borrower

                
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
                  /s/ Jack
      Qin

                	
                  /s/ Yeuh-Chi
      Liu

                
	
                  Jack
      Qin

                	
                  Yeuh-Chi
      Liu

                
	
                  Executive
      Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Lee Arthur Momient

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04540

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, October 29, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall:This case is hereby

dismissed pursuant to settlement. Status hearing set for 10/30/2012 is stricken. Civil case

terminated. Telephoned notice(tsa, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04540 Document #: 27 Filed: 10/29/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:91
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30101

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DERRICK HOLDEN, also known as D-Lo, also known as Terrance T. Holden,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:09-CR-209-1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit 

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Derrick Holden, federal prisoner # 14428-035, was convicted of 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine 

and was sentenced to 135 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised 

release. He appeals the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a 

sentence reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendments 782 and 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 20, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30101 Document: 00514203764 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/20/2017
No. 17-30101

2

788. He contends that the district court relied on a clearly erroneous 

assessment of the evidence when it found that he posed a continued threat to 

public safety and, therefore, abused its discretion in denying his § 3582(c)(2) 

motion. 

Holden had prior convictions for drug possession, domestic abuse 

battery, burglary of a habitation, and simple assault. He participated in an 

attempted robbery of a drug stash house in the instant offense. He was 

resentenced for the instant offense after it was discovered that he had used his 

brother’s name at the time of his arrest, prosecution, and original sentencing. 

At this resentencing, he received a significant downward departure from the 

original guidelines range on account of his substantial assistance to the 

Government. All his prison disciplinary violations, except for failing to stand 

count, occurred after he was resentenced. The district court’s finding that 

Holden posed a continued threat to public safety was plausible in light of his 

criminal history and his prison disciplinary record and, therefore, the district 

court’s determination that a sentence reduction was not warranted was not 

based on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence and was not an abuse 

of discretion. See United States v. Henderson, 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-30101 Document: 00514203764 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/20/2017
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6670-6671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01271]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 731-TA-1472 (Final)]


Difluoromethane (R-32) From China; Cancellation of Hearing for 
Final Phase Anti-Dumping Duty Investigation

AGENCY:  United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Effective Date: January 12, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ahdia Bavari ((202) 205-3191), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Effective August 27, 2020, the Commission 
published its schedule for the final phase of this investigation (85 FR 
55688, September 9, 2020), further revised effective October 19, 2020 
(85 FR 68566, October 23, 2020). Counsel for Arkema filed its request 
to appear at the hearing on January 8, 2021. No other parties submitted 
a request to appear at the hearing. On January 12, 2021, counsel 
withdrew their request to appear at the hearing. Counsel indicated a 
willingness to submit written responses to any Commission questions in 
lieu of an actual hearing. Consequently, the public hearing in 
connection with this investigation, scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. on 
January 14, 2021, is cancelled. Parties to this investigation should 
respond to any written questions posed by the Commission in their 
posthearing briefs, which are due to be filed on January 21, 2021.
    For further information concerning this investigation see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and 
part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority:  This investigation is being conducted under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 
published

[[Page 6671]]

pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 14, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-01271 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT
23(a)





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-38373, 333-64312, 333-96435, 333-92130, 333-97749,
333-118784, 333-145204, 333-149466 and 333-161301) of Pharmos Corporation of our
report dated February 25, 2009 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-K/A.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 New
York, New York
 March
3, 2010
242.7001 Contract clause. Use the clause at 252.242-7005, Contractor Business Systems, in solicitations and contracts (other than in contracts with educational institutions, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs), or University Associated Research Centers (UARCs) operated by educational institutions) when— ( a ) The resulting contract will be a covered contract as defined in 242.7000(a); and
( b ) The solicitation or contract includes any of the following clauses: ( 1 ) 252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements.
( 2 ) 252.234-7002, Earned Value Management System.
( 3 ) 252.242-7004, Material Management and Accounting System.
( 4 ) 252.242-7006, Accounting System Administration.
( 5 ) 252.244-7001, Contractor Purchasing System Administration.
( 6 ) 252.245-7003, Contractor Property Management System Administration.
[76 FR 28868, May 18, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 11366, Feb. 24, 2012]
1/10/14 EDGAR ONLINE - PRIMEENERGY CORP (PNRG) - 10-K - 3/27/2013

yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=9188056-170137-175969&type=sect&dcn=0001193125-13-129339 1/2

Enter your Email to Register for EDGAR Pro: PRIMEENERGY CORP (PNRG) 10-K filed 3/27/2013

Display Sections View Entire Filing Next Section Previous Section Print Section

PRIMEENERGYCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCESHEET

(Thousands of dollars)

As of December 31,

2012 2011

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents $ 8,602 $ 8,661

Restricted cash and cash equivalents 4,672 5,142

Accounts receivable, net 13,212 16,506

Prepaid obligations 1,656 7,469

Derivative contracts 1,229 223

Other current assets 1,081 1,725

Total Current Assets 30,452 39,726

Property and Equipment

Oil and gas properties at cost 338,204 492,393

Less: Accumulated depletion and depreciation (150,276) (355,643)

187,928 136,750

Field and office equipment at cost 23,974 21,553

Less: Accumulated depreciation (15,052) (13,608)

8,922 7,945

Total Property and Equipment, Net 196,850 144,695

Other Assets 784 614

Total Assets $ 228,086 $ 185,035

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
1

/10/14EDGARONLINE-PRIMEENERGYCORP(PNRG)-10-K-3/27/2013

yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=9188056-170137-175969&type=sect&dcn=0001193125-13-1293392/2

LIABILITIESANDEQUITY

CurrentLiabilities

Accountspayable$19,568$29,538

Accruedliabilities7,6188,963

Currentportionofassetretirementandotherlong-termobligations2,14812,854

Derivativeliabilityshort-term9942,269

Duetorelatedparties6767

TotalCurrentLiabilities30,39553,691

Long-TermBankDebt122,00069,800

AssetRetirementObligations6,8646,416

DerivativeLiabilityLong-Term4311,461

DeferredIncomeTaxes24,19417,914
1804.470-3 IT security requirements. ( a ) These IT security requirements cover all NASA awards in which IT plays a role in the provisioning of services or products (*e.g.,* research and development, engineering, manufacturing, IT outsourcing, human resources, and finance) that support NASA in meeting its institutional and mission objectives. These requirements are applicable when a contractor or subcontractor must obtain physical or electronic access beyond that granted the general public to NASA's computer systems, networks, or IT infrastructure. These requirements are applicable when NASA information is generated, stored, processed, or exchanged with NASA or on behalf of NASA by a contractor or subcontractor, regardless of whether the information resides on a NASA or a contractor/subcontractor's information system.
( b ) The Applicable Documents List (ADL) should consist of all NASA Agency-level IT Security and Center IT Security Policies applicable to the contract. Documents listed in the ADL as well as applicable Federal IT Security Policies are available at the NASA IT Security Policy Web site at: *http://www.nasa.gov/offices/ocio/itsecurity/index.html .*
[76 FR 4080, Jan. 24, 2011]
229.101 Resolving tax problems. ( a ) Within DoD, the agency-designated legal counsels are the defense agency General Counsels, the General Counsels of the Navy and Air Force, and for the Army, the Chief, Contract Law Division, Office of the Judge Advocate General. For additional information on the designated legal counsels, see PGI 229.101(a).
( b ) For information on fuel excise taxes, see PGI 229.101(b).
( c ) For guidance on directing a contractor to litigate the applicability of a particular tax, see PGI 229.101(c).
( d ) For information on tax relief agreements between the United States and European foreign governments, see PGI 229.101(d).
[70 FR 8538, Feb. 22, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 14100, Mar. 21, 2006]
225.106 Determining reasonableness of cost. ( b ) Use an evaluation factor of 50 percent instead of the factors specified in FAR 25.106(b)(1)(i) and (c)(1)(i).
[68 FR 15618, Mar. 31, 2003. Redesignated at 89 FR 11954, Feb. 15, 2024]
#### In the Matter of Seymour Gratz, v. Edward F. Cavanagh, Jr., as Fire Commissioner of the City of New York.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied with leave to renew upon proper papers. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 57 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to 

‘‘Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal 

Credit Opportunity Act’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ‘‘Indi5 rect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal Credit 

6 Opportunity Act’’ (CFPB Bulletin 2013–02 (March 21, 

7 2013), and printed in the Congressional Record on De8 cember 6, 2017, on pages S7888–S7889, along with a let9 ter of opinion from the Government Accountability Office 

10 dated December 5, 2017, that the Bulletin is a rule under 
2 

†SJ 57 ES 

1 the Congressional Review Act), and such rule shall have 

2 no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate April 18, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 57 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chaptunity Act’’. and Compliance with the Equal Credit Oppor- Protection relating to ‘‘Indirect Auto Lending submitted by Bureau of Consumer Financial ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
247.270-3 Evaluation of bids and proposals. As a minimum, require that offers include— ( a ) Tonnage or commodity rates that apply to the bulk of the cargo worked under normal conditions;
( b ) Labor-hour rates that apply to services not covered by commodity rates, or to work performed under hardship conditions; and
( c ) Rates for equipment rental.
[65 FR 50144, Aug. 17, 2000. Redesignated at 75 FR 51417, Aug. 20, 2010]
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard S. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|/s/RICHARD S. ANDERSONRichard S. Anderson Chief Financial
OfficerSeptember 6, 2002 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks