alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10335 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
CARL DAVID CROWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:00-CR-42-1

-------------------- October 25, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carl David Crowell appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Crowell contends that the district court clearly erred in sentencing him based on the Presentence Report’s (PSR) “actual” d-methamphetamine calculation. He argues that, because he was unable to find an independent chemist with the ability to test for drug purity, he could not rebut the PSR’sNo. 01-10335 -2- drug purity findings and was therefore denied due process. Crowell further asserts that the district court erred in admitting a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) lab report because 1) the report constituted unreliable hearsay evidence and 2) the admission of the report violated Crowell’s right of confrontation/cross examination. We have reviewed the record and briefs submitted by the parties and hold that the district court did not clearly err in admitting the DEA lab report and in basing Crowell’s sentence on the PSR’s “actual” d-methamphetamine calculation. See United States v. Alford , 142 F.3d 825, 831 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Davis , 76 F.3d 82, 84 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
# C_2016385EN.01000202.xml

| 19.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8135 — Cerberus/GE Money Bank/SOREFI/SOMAFI-SOGUAFI/GE Financement Pacifique)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 385/04)

On 1 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8135. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8135. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### 231.100-70 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.231-7000, Supplemental Cost Principles, in all solicitations and contracts which are subject to the principles and procedures described in FAR subpart 31.1, 31.2, 31.6, or 31.7.

[59 FR 27672, May 27, 1994]
225.401 Exceptions. (a)(2)(A) If a department or agency considers an individual acquisition of a product to be indispensable for national security or national defense purposes and appropriate for exclusion from the provisions of FAR subpart 25.4, it may submit a request with supporting rationale to the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy (DPCAP), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) (OUSD(A&S)DPCAP). Approval by OUSD(A&S)DPCAP is not required if— ( 1 ) Purchase from foreign sources is restricted by statute (see subpart 225.70);
( 2 ) Another exception in FAR 25.401 applies to the acquisition; or
( 3 ) Competition from foreign sources is restricted under subpart 225.71.
(B) Public interest exceptions for certain countries when acquiring products or services in support of operations in Afghanistan are in 225.7704-1. [75 FR 81916, Dec. 29, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 73236, Oct. 25, 2023; 89 FR 60831, July 29, 2024]
242.705-1 Contracting officer determination procedure. ( a ) *Applicability and responsibility.* (1) The corporate administrative contracting officer and individual administrative contracting officers shall jointly decide how to conduct negotiations. Follow the procedures at PGI 242.705-1(a)(1) when negotiations are conducted on a coordinated basis.
[70 FR 67920, Nov. 9, 2005]
242.803 Disallowing costs after incurrence. ( a ) *Contracting officer receipt of vouchers.* Contracting officer receipt of vouchers is applicable only for cost-reimbursement contracts with the Canadian Commercial Corporation. See 225.870-5(b) for invoice procedures.
( b ) *Auditor receipt of voucher.* ( i ) The contract auditor is the authorized representative of the contracting officer for— ( A ) Receiving vouchers from contractors electronically or by other delivery methods as directed by the terms of the contract;
( B ) Approving interim vouchers that were selected using sampling methodologies for provisional payment and sending them to the disbursing office after a pre-payment review. Interim vouchers not selected for a pre-payment review will be considered to be provisionally approved and will be sent directly to the disbursing office. All provisionally approved interim vouchers are subject to a later audit of actual costs incurred;
( C ) Reviewing completion/final vouchers and sending them to the administrative contracting officer; and
( D ) Issuing DCAA Forms 1, Notice of Contract Costs Suspended and/or Disapproved, to deduct costs where allowability is questionable.
( ii ) The administrative contracting officer— ( A ) Approves all completion/final vouchers and sends them to the disbursing officer; and
( B ) May issue or direct the issuance of DCAA Form 1 on any cost when there is reason to believe it should be suspended or disallowed.
[61 FR 25409, May 21, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 25409, May 21, 1996; 61 FR 50454, Sept. 26, 1996; 77 FR 52259, Aug. 29, 2012]
```

[106th Congress Public Law 409]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ409.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1787]]

Public Law 106-409
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
       To amend the Immigration and <<NOTE: Nov. 1, 2000 -  [H.R. 
4068]>> Nationality Act to extend for an additional 3 years the special 
                   immigrant religious worker program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of <<NOTE: Religious Workers 
Act of 2000.>> Representatives of the United States of America in 
Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 8 USC 1101 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Workers Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL IMMIGRANT RELIGIOUS WORKER 
            PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking 
``2000,'' each place it appears and inserting ``2003,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The <<NOTE: 8 USC 1101 note.>> amendment made 
by subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2000.

    Approved November 1, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4068 (S. 2406):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 19, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table A-2.Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of aromatic contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1990. - a,b,c,d,e 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-2. Continued. Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of aromatic contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1990. - a,b,c,d,e 

Footnotes:

a The concentrations of the analytes and the percent recoveries of the surrogate standards were calculated using hexamethylbenzene as the internal standard.

b Concentrations and initial identifications were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) - multiple ion detection.

c The "less than" symbol (<) indicates that the analyte was not detected in concentrations above the stated value. 

d Concentrations less than 10 are rounded to one significant figure; concentrations greater than 10 are rounded to two significant figures.

e Percent recoveries for the internal standards (surrogates) averaged 91%, CV = 18%, n = 58. Percent recoveries of the surrogates include quality control samples.

f Benzo[k]fluoranthene and benzo[j]fluoranthene often coelute. This combined concentration is reported.

g Blank data were subtracted from the sample, and the results are reported here.

h These samples are duplicate analyses. The data for the duplicate samples were somewhat different which implies that the samples were not homogeneous.

i RSD is the relative standard deviation which is the standard deviation divided by the mean and expressed as a percent.

j Standard reference material from the National Institute of Science and Technology. 

Table of Contents
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
DNB Financial Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-78913, 333-121145, 333-125999, 333-126610 and
333-138214 on Form S-8 and 333-131954 on Form S-3 of DNB Financial Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated March 31, 2009,
with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of DNB Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which report appears in the
December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of DNB Financial Corporation.

Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of by DNB Financial Corporation of FASB Statement No. 123 (revised),Share-Based Payment, a
revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,effective January 1, 2006, Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangementseffective
January 1, 2007, and FASB Statement No. 157,Fair Value Measurements,effective January 1, 2008.

/s/ KPMG LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 2009


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Charles W. Fischer,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian  Corporation (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)    the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-Q of the  Company  for the  quarterly
       period  ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
       Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
       Company.



Date:  July 12, 2007                  /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                      -----------------------------
                                      Charles W. Fischer
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00300-CR

GERION HANDSBOROUGH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 396th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1753617R)

December 28, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
23.406 Contract clauses. ( a ) Insert the clause at 52.223-5, Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information, in solicitations and contracts that provide for performance, in whole or in part, on a Federal facility.
( b ) Insert the clause at 52.223-19, Compliance With Environmental Management Systems, in solicitations and contracts for contractor operation of Government-owned or -leased facilities or vehicles located in the United States if an agency uses an EMS and contractor activities affect aspects of the agency's environmental management. For facilities located outside the United States, the agency head may determine that use of the clause is in the best interest of the Government.
( c ) Insert the clause at 52.223-10, Waste Reduction Program, in solicitations and contracts for contractor operation of Government-owned or -leased facilities and all solicitations and contracts for support services at Government-owned or -operated facilities.
### Mineral resource assessment of the Dillon 1° x 2° quadrangle, Idaho and Montana

By: Robert Carl PearsonC. M. TrautweinE. T. RuppelW. F. HannaL. C. RowanJ. S. LoenB. R. Berger

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1077

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The Dillon 1°x2° quadrangle in southwestern Montana and east-central Idaho was investigated as part of the U.S. Geological Survey's Conterminous United States Mineral Assessment Program (CUSMAP) to determine its mineral resource potential. An interdisciplinary study was made of geology, geochemistry, geophysics (gravity and aeromagnetics), remote sensing, and mineral deposits. The results of those studies, as well as mineral resource assessment of numerous mineraldeposit types, are published separately as a folio of maps. This report summarizes the studies, provides background information on them, and presents a selected bibliography relevant to the geology and mineral resources of the quadrangle. 

The quadrangle contains large resources of gold and substantial resources of talc and chlorite, all of which were being mined in the 1980's and early 1990's. Submarginal resources of molybdenum, copper, tungsten, and iron range from moderately large to large. Other commodities that may be present in significant amounts are chromite, lead, zinc, silver, barite, zeolite minerals, and various nonmetallic metamorphic minerals. 

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Hard Drive Productions, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01532

Honorable Edmond E. Chang

Does 1−54, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, June 26, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiff's motion to file

supplemental authority [29] is granted. There is no need for a separate brief or separate

filing of the supplemental order. Defendants and Comcast may, but need not, respond to

the supplemental authority on or before 06/29/12. The Court has the filings under

advisement. Status and motion hearings of 06/27/12 is reset to 07/24/12 at 9:30 a.m.

Mailed notice(slb, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01532 Document #: 31 Filed: 06/26/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:234
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Marvin F.  Romanow,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period
     ended  September  30,  2010 as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
     Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 3, 2010

                                          /s/ Marvin F. Romanow
                                          ---------------------
                                          Marvin F. Romanow
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       60
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Evaluation of spacecrafttechnology programs [electronic resource] : effects on communication satellitebusiness ventures**
 
Volumes: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:174978-174979
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000691938
 
January 13, 2020
December 1 , 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

STEVE GRIFFITH, IN H IS OFFICIAL CAPACITY , DOUGLAS BRINKLEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACIT Y, SCOTT SCHULTZ , IN HIS OFFIC I AL CAPACITY, AND MARK G ROTHAUS, IN HIS OFFI CIAL CAPACITY , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 14

- 00900

- CV V.
COLLISION CLINIC, L. L.C. AND HANNA “JOHN ” ELIAS , Appellees

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the “Order Denyin g Defendants’ Plea to Jurisdiction,” signed November 5, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and conclude the trial court lacks jurisdiction over appellees’ suit against appellants

. We therefore order the “Order De nying Defendants’ Plea to Jurisdiction” of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment dismissing the suit against Steve Griffith , in his Official Capacity, Douglas Brinkley , in his Official Capacity, Scott Schultz , in his Official Capacity, and Mark Grot haus , in his Official Capacity

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee s , Collision Clinic, L.L.C. and Hanna “John” Elias, jointly and severally

. We further order this decision certified below for observance

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                      
<ARTICLE>                                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
                                            
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,143 <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,401
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         178,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        148,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,512
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,582
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,829
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES $878 OF RESTRICTED CASH.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>