alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99

                                    CHAPARRAL
                            CHAPARRAL RESOURCES, INC.




August 19, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0609

Re:  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Dear Sir or Madam:

     The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code. In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                            Sincerely,


                                            /s/  James A. Jeffs
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 James A. Jeffs
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


                                            /s/  Michael B. Young
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Michael B. Young
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### 225.7012 Restriction on supercomputers.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as                           ( print page 6659)                        amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.                

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Institutional Training Grant Applications.                    

*Date:*                         March 2, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 664, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jimok Kim, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 664, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8559,                         *jimok.kim@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 14, 2021.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-01264 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:207
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:208
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:209
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:210
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:211
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:212
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:213
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:214
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:215
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:216
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:217
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:218
Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 45-4 Filed: 02/19/13 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:219
Exhibit
      32(b)







**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter M. Scott III,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Peter M. Scott III


Peter
      M.
      Scott III


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      9,
      2006








This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

KIMBERLY LUDERUS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

U.S. HELICOPTERS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

 

No. 12 CV 5094 

Judge James B. Zagel 

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

 On February 25, 2013, I entered an order dismissing Plaintiff’s one-count Complaint for 

gender discrimination and granting her leave to amend. The original Complaint was dismissed 

because it did “not allege a single fact from which this Court [could] plausibly infer that 

[Plaintiff] is entitled to relief.” Simply put, Plaintiff did not plead any facts to describe how she 

was subject to gender discrimination. Rather, the complaint contained only a threadbare recital of 

the basic elements of a Title VII claim. Plaintiff has now filed an Amended Complaint in which 

she lists six male coemployees and alleges that they engaged in certain conduct for which they 

were not terminated. This list is meaningless, however, because Plaintiff still fails to allege what 

happened to her. I cannot plausibly infer gender discrimination because I have no facts by 

which to compare Defendant’s treatment of Plaintiff to Defendant’s alleged treatment of 

similarly situated male coemployees. This case is dismissed with prejudice.1

 

1

 I cannot tell whether Plaintiff has no case and her counsel is doing his best to state a claim without violating Rule 

11, or if Plaintiff has a case and her counsel’s performance has fallen below a basic level of competence. If it is the 

latter, the Plaintiff may wish to pursue a malpractice claim. 
ENTER:

James B. Zagel 

United States District Judge 

DATE: June 13, 2013
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00341- CR

Lance Edw ard Goodwin , Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F RUNNELS COUNTY , 119 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 520 8, H ONO RAB LE B EN WO ODW ARD, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
L an ce Edwar d Goodwin filed a “petition for writ of err or cora m nobis” in th e district court, challeng ing the validity of the court’s 2003 judgme nt finding Goodwi n guilty of the offe nse of impersonating a public serva nt and placing Goodwin on community sup er v i s i o n . 1 The district court dismiss ed Goo dwi n ’s petition, and Goodwin has filed a pro se notice of appea l from that orde r.

The purpose of t he writ of error coram nobis is to bring befor e t h e co u rt rende ring the judgme nt matters of fac t which, if known at the time the judgme nt was rende red, wo u l d have preve nted its rendition. Ex parte McKenzie , 115 Tex. Crim. 315, 29 S.W .2d 771, 772 (Tex. Crim.

In 2006, the dis t ri ct court signe d an order discharg ing Goodwin from the terms and 1 conditions of his community supervision.App. 1930). The court of criminal appea ls has long held that the writ has no application in this State.

See E x parte Masse

y , 157 Tex. Crim . 491, 249 S.W .2d 599, 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952). Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appea l for want o f jurisdiction. See McKenzie , 29 S.W .2d at 772.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Pember

ton Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

21, 2010 Do Not Publish

2
245.107 Contract clauses. ( 1 ) ( i ) In lieu of the prescription at FAR 45.107(d), use the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property, in all purchase orders for repair, maintenance, overhaul, or modification of Government property regardless of the unit acquisition cost of the items to be repaired.
( ii ) For negotiated fixed-price contracts awarded on a basis other than submission of certified cost or pricing data for which Government property is provided, use the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property, without its Alternate I.
( 2 ) Use the clause at 252.245-7000, Government-Furnished Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy Property, in solicitations and contracts when mapping, charting, and geodesy property is to be furnished.
( 3 ) Use the clause at 252.245-7003, Contractor Property Management System Administration, in solicitations and contracts containing the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property.
( 4 ) Use the clause at 252.245-7005, Management and Reporting of Government Property, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that contain the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property.
[76 FR 6006, 6008, Feb. 2, 2011, as amended at 76 FR 28872, May 18, 2011; 76 FR 52142, Aug. 19, 2011; 76 FR 71826, Nov. 18, 2011; 84 FR 18162, Apr. 30, 2019; 88 FR 88537, Dec. 22, 2023]
23.302 Hazardous material identification and notice of material safety data. ( a ) The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for issuing and administering regulations that require Government activities to apprise their employees of— ( 1 ) All hazards to which they may be exposed;
( 2 ) Relative symptoms and appropriate emergency treatment; and
( 3 ) Proper conditions and precautions for safe use and exposure.
( b ) To accomplish this objective, it is necessary to obtain certain information relative to the hazards which may be introduced into the workplace by the supplies being acquired. Accordingly, offerors and contractors are required to submit hazardous materials data whenever the supplies being acquired are identified as hazardous materials. The latest version of Federal Standard No. 313 (Material Safety Data Sheet, Preparation and Submission of) includes criteria for identification of hazardous materials.
( c ) Hazardous material data (Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS's)) are required— ( 1 ) As specified in the latest version of Federal Standard No. 313 (including revisions adopted during the term of the contract);
( 2 ) For any other material designated by a Government technical representative as potentially hazardous and requiring safety controls.
( d ) MSDS's must be submitted— ( 1 ) By the apparent successful offeror prior to contract award if hazardous materials are expected to be used during contract performance.
( 2 ) For agencies other than the Department of Defense, again by the contractor with the supplies at the time of delivery.
( e ) The contracting officer shall provide a copy of all MSDS's received to the safety officer or other designated individual.
[48 FR 42275, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 56 FR 55374, Oct. 25, 1991; 62 FR 236, Jan. 2, 1997]
EXHIBIT 4.2


                             ALLONGE AND AMENDMENT
                                       to
                     SERIES A WARRANTS OF ELXSI CORPORATION

        THIS ALLONGE AND AMENDMENT (this "instrument") to the Series A Warrant
to Purchase Common Stock of ELXSI Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), described hereinbelow (the "Subject Warrants Agreement"; and the
warrants evidenced thereby, the "Subject Warrants") is being executed by the
Company and the current holder (the "Holder") of the Subject Warrants, with the
intention and understanding that: (1) the amendments set forth herein shall be
binding upon the Company, the Holder and their respective successors and assigns
(including, without limitation, subsequent holders of the Subject Warrants); and
(2) this instrument shall be attached to, and form a part of, the Subject
Warrants Agreement or, in lieu thereof, that the amendments of the Subject
Warrants provided for herein shall be incorporated in any new Subject Warrants
Agreement that may be issued at a future date (including upon any transfer of
the Subject Warrants).

        FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, and intending to be legally
bound, it is hereby agreed as follows:

        1.  Increase in of Exercise Price. With the intention of increasing the
current exercise price of the Subject Warrants from $3.125 per share to $3.75
per share, the Subject Warrant Agreement is hereby amended by: (A) deleting the
"$3.125" both times it appears in the initial paragraph thereof; and (B)
inserting, in lieu thereof, "$3.75".

        2.  Extension of Expiration Date. With the intention of extending the
expiration date of the Subject Warrants by two years, the Subject Warrant
Agreement is hereby amended by: (A) deleting the "September 30, 1996" where it
appears in the definition of "Expiration Date" therein and; and (B) inserting,
in lieu thereof, the "September 30, 1998".

        3. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Subject
Warrants Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the
terms thereof. This instrument shall be governed by the laws of the State of New
York, without regard to the provisions thereof relating to conflict of laws.

Dated:                       , 1997         Subject Warrants:
       ----------------------               ----------------

                                            Cert. No.:      A-7
                                            Dated:          8/1/95
                                            No. Warrants:   50,000

Agreed and Accepted:

The Company:                                The Holder:
-----------                                 ----------

ELXSI CORPORATION                           ELIOT KIRKLAND L.L.C.


By:                                         By:
   ----------------------------                 ---------------------------
   Name:                                        Name:
   Title:                                       Title:
<PAGE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended May 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Environmental Tectonics Corporation (the "Company") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                   William F. Mitchell
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   William F. Mitchell
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

                                                   July 14, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                  
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|November 5, 2008
From: Christopher Bolduc [mailto:cabolduc@lbl.gov]  

Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 1:37 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com;

john.caskey@nema.org; jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com;

john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; adelaski@standardsasap.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org;

gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; rgreeson@federalpacific.com;

bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; jhodge@howard.com; mhyland@appanet.org;

dave.millure@metglas.com; snadel@aceee.org; wes.patterson@us.abb.com;

Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com;

artrosenfeld@gmail.com; srosenstock@eei.org; rroy@nrdc.org;

robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com;

Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; Jim.creevy@nema.org;

ahofmann@publicpower.org; pkumar@publicpower.org; jmauer@standardsasap.org;

Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com; jrossetti@mlgw.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com;

jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; mwaltner@nrdc.org;

kwinder@mleainc.com; cabolduc@lbl.gov; Brian Coffey; kcoughlin@lbl.gov;

brenda.edwards@ee.doe.gov; jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov; Caitlin Johnson; Zhimei

Luo; emily.marchetti@ee.doe.gov; Michael Rivest; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov;

charlied@uus.org; phopkinson@hvolt.com; James.Lass@cleco.com;

maheshsampat@bellsouth.net; DYoung@energy‐solution.com;

chad.kennedy@us.schneider‐electric.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com;

vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; thomas.patzner@us.schneider‐electric.com;

carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; Raba, Jim

Subject: MV LCC and PBP Sensitivity Results: Materials Exclusion, ZDMH, H0, and

SA1

Dear Committee Members,

Please find draft LCC and PBP sensitivity results for both liquid‐immersed and

dry‐type medium voltage transformers (design lines 1‐5, 9 ‐13B) attached. The

sensitivity excludes ZDMH, H0 and SA1 as core materials from sample of designs

options.

Thank you,

‐ Chris

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Christopher Bolduc <cabolduc@lbl.gov> wrote:

> Dear Committee Members,

>

> Please find the draft LCC and NIA results for dry‐type medium‐voltage  

> transformers (design lines 9 ‐ 13B) attached.

>

> Thanks you,

> ‐ Chris

>

>

> ‐‐‐‐ 

> Chris Bolduc

> Energy Efficiency Standards Group

> Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National  

> Laboratory t. 416‐535‐7546 c. 647‐832‐4021
>

‐‐  

‐‐‐‐ 

Chris Bolduc

Energy Efficiency Standards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416‐535‐7546 c. 647‐832‐4021
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward J. Fitzpatrick, Appellant.

— Defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered April 7, 1977, convicting him of burglary in the first degree (two counts), assault in the first degree, attempted rape in the first degree and possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. In our opinion, there was probable cause for the defendant’s detention on September 14, 1976. Consequently, there is no basis for the claim that his confession and incriminating oral statements of that day should have been suppressed because they were the "fruit” of an unlawful arrest (see, generally, *Brown v Illinois,*422 US 590). We have examined the defendant’s other contentions and find that they are without merit. O’Connor, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.