alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 252.216-7002 Alternate A, Time-and-Materials/Labor-Hour Proposal Requirements—Other Than Commercial Acquisition with Adequate Price Competition.

As prescribed in 216.601(e), substitute the following paragraph (c) for paragraph (c) of the provision at FAR 52.216-29:

# Alternate A, Time-and-Materials/Labor-Hour Proposal Requirements—Other Than Commercial Acquisition With Adequate Price Competition (JAN 2023)

(c) The offeror must establish fixed hourly rates using separate rates for each category of labor to be performed by each subcontractor and for each category of labor to be performed by the offeror, and for each category of labor to be transferred between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of the offeror under a common control.

[71 FR 74471, Dec. 12, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 6591, Jan. 31, 2023]
#### In the Matter of Willis & Brown, Inc., Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Determination of the State Liquor Authority canceling petitioner’s retail liquor store license, unanimously annulled, on the law, and the matter remanded to respondent with a direction to reinstate the license, without costs. The record fails to establish the charge that the licensee permitted another to avail himself of the license within the meaning of section 111 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law and the determination herein is not supported by substantial evidence. The attorney’s presence at the licensed premises was an incident of and consistent with legal measures to salvage a secured loan, the making and validity of which is undisputed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Fiscal ... performance report
1999,2000

 
SuDoc: Y 3.N 21/29:1/�����������
�Item Number:1089-U (online)
CGP system Number:000550388
|    |                                                                                                                                 |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 30, 2013 of Flow International Corporation; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                             |
|-----------------------------|
|                             |  |
| /s/ Charles M. Brown        |   |
| Charles M. Brown            |   |
| Principal Executive Officer |   |
| August 28, 2013        |   |
#### 227.7202 Commercial computer software and commercial computer software documentation.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Zurich American Insurance Company v. Sandra A. Debose

Appellate case number: 01-13-00344-CV

Trial court case number: 2006-54103

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that Sandra Dubose’s motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.

Justice Sharp dissents, without opinion, from the denial of the motion for rehearing.

Date: September 23, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

The undersigned, David W. Kalish, does hereby certify to his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of One Liberty
Properties, Inc. ("the Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



Date: March 16, 2011

/s/ DAVID W. KALISH David W. Kalish Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### 252.217-7011 Access to vessel.

As prescribed at 217.7104(a), use the following clause:

# Access to Vessel (DEC 1991)

(a) Upon the request of the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall grant admission to the Contractor's facilities and access to vessel, on a non-interference basis, as necessary to perform their respective responsibilities, to a reasonable number of:

(1) Government and other Government contractor employees (in addition to those Government employees attached to the vessel); and

(2) Representatives of offerors on other contemplated Government work.

(b) All personnel granted access shall comply with Contractor rules governing personnel at its shipyard.

(End of clause)
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000013777
<NAME> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,309
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,130
<PP&E>                                         520,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 512,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,708
<BONDS>                                        193,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           217
<OTHER-SE>                                     298,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   512,980
<SALES>                                         23,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,350
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,165
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

MAR 1 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

SUBJECT: Posting a New Public Comment Phase ofEPA-HQ-OPPT-2011 -0516 to 

Regulations.gov for Public Access 

FROM: Mary F. Dominiak "' ~4-/?!~ ~ Existing Chemicals Br~ 

Chemical Control Division 

THRU: o 'Chemical ariaJ.Doa,Director Control Division ~ 

TO: Assem Akram, Docket Manager 

USEP A Docket Center 

This memorandum authorizes the posting of a new public comment phase of EPA-HQOPPT -2011 -0516 to Regulations.gov for public access. This docket is non-regulatory in 

nature and is not associated with any Federal Register notice. This new docket phase will 

be open to public comment through December 31, 2012. This public comment period 

may be extended by subsequent memoranda. 

As part of EPA's comprehensive approach to enhance the Agency's current chemicals 

management program, EPA announced plans in August 2011 to use a two-step process to 

identify chemical substances for assessment under the Toxic Substances Control Act 

(TSCA). Following the public meeting phase of this project, EPA refined its 

identification methodology and identified a Work Plan of chemicals to help focus and 

direct the chemical risk assessment activities of the Existing Chemicals Program over the 

next several years. 

This public comment phase of the docket begins with the release of the TSCA Work Plan 

Chemicals Methods Document, and allows comment on the Methods Document and the 

submission of relevant information on the chemicals included in the TSCA Work Plan for 

consideration during the Agency's risk assessment process. 

Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Eric Shultz 

by phone at (202) 566-1883, or via email atschultz.eric@epa.gov. If you have questions 

concerning this docket, please contact Mary Dominiak by phone at 202-564-8104, or via 

email at dominiak.mary@epa.gov. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa .gov 

Recycled/Recyclable ' Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000715273
<NAME> WYNDHAM INTERNATIONA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          99,797                  69,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  214,017                 185,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,131                  23,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               440,319                 325,950
<PP&E>                                         668,959                 662,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,215                  36,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,123,203               2,006,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          719,155                 602,494
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         36                      36
<COMMON>                                         2,342                   2,135
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,378                 132,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,123,203               2,006,821
<SALES>                                        638,830                 290,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               671,517                 329,982
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,240                 200,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239,014                 116,213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,727                   5,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,723                   9,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (6,466)                 (3,187)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,153)                  3,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.07)                   0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)                   0.03
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Malibu Media, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04680

Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly

John Does 1−55

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, August 1, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly:Status hearing held and

continued to 9/12/2012 at 9:30 AM. Memorandum regarding joinder issue is due

8/15/2012. Motion for leave to serve 3rd party subpoenas prior to a Rule 26(f) conference

is entered and continued to status hearing date. (or, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04680 Document #: 6 Filed: 08/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:57
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In
connection with the Annual Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), we, Xiao Ping Zhang
and Zong Yun Zhou, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated this 29th day of March, 2012 | By:/s/ Xiao Ping Zhang
        Xiao Ping Zhang
        Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                   |                                                                               
|                                   | By:/s/ Zong Yun Zhou
        Zong Yun Zhou
        Chief Financial Officer    





The foregoing certification is being furnished herewith
the Company’s 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and it is not being incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language
in such filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### 1852.217-71 Phased acquisition using down-selection procedures.

As prescribed in 1817.7002(a), insert the following clause:

# Phased Acquisition Using Down-Selection Procedures (APR 2015)

(a) This solicitation is for the acquisition of ________________________ [insert Program title]. The acquisition will be conducted as a two-phased procurement using a competitive down-selection technique between phases. In this technique, two or more contractors will be selected for Phase 1. It is expected that the single contractor for Phase 2 will be chosen from among these contractors after a competitive down-selection.

(b) Phase 1 is for the ______________________ [insert purpose of phase]. Phase 2 is for ______________________ [insert general Phase 2 goals].

(c) The competition for Phase 2 will be based on the results of Phase 1, and the award criteria for Phase 2 will include successful completion of Phase 1 requirements.

(d) NASA will issue a separate, formal solicitation for Phase 2 that will include all information required for preparation of proposals, including the final evaluation factors.

(e) Phase 2 will be synopsized in the Governmentwide Point of Entry (GPE) in accordance with FAR 5.201 and 5.203 unless one of the exceptions in FAR 5.202 applies. Notwithstanding NASA's expectation that only the Phase 1 contractors will be capable of successfully competing for Phase 2, all proposals will be considered.

(f) To be considered for Phase 2 award, offerors must demonstrate a design maturity equivalent to that of the Phase 1 contractors. This, demonstration shall include the following Phase 1 deliverables upon which Phase 2 award will be based: ______________________________ [(insert the specific Phase 1 deliverables]. Failure to fully and completely demonstrate the appropriate level of design maturity may render the proposal unacceptable with no further consideration for contract award.

(g) The following draft Phase 2 evaluation factors are provided for your information. Please note that these evaluation factors are not final, and NASA reserves the right to change them at any time up to and including the date upon which Phase 2 proposals are solicited.

[Insert draft Phase 2 evaluation factors (and subfactors, if available), including demonstration of successful completion of Phase 1 requirements.]

(h) Although NASA will request Phase 2 proposals from Phase contractors, submission of the Phase 2 proposal is not a requirement of the Phase 1 contract. Accordingly, the costs of preparing these proposals shall not be a direct charge to the Phase 1 contract or any other Government contract.

(i) The anticipated schedule for conducting this phased procurement is provided for your information. These dates are projections only and are not intended to commit NASA to complete a particular action at a given time. [Insert dates below].

Phase 1 award—

Phase 2 synopsis—

Phase 2 proposal requested—

Phase 2 proposal receipt—

Phase 2 award—

(End of clause)

[63 FR 56093, Oct. 21, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 30013, May 10, 2000; 76 FR 72330, Nov. 23, 2011; 80 FR 12946, Mar. 12, 2015; 80 FR 75843, Dec. 4, 2015]
#### 252.246-7005 Notice of Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items.

As prescribed in 246.710(3)(i), use the following provision:

# Notice of Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items (MAR 2016)

(a) *Definitions. Duration,* *enterprise, enterprise identifier,* *fixed expiration, item type,* *serialized item, starting event,* *unique item identifier, usage,* *warranty administrator, warranty guarantor,* and *warranty tracking* are defined in the clause at 252.246-7006, Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items.

(b) *Reporting of data for warranty tracking and administration.* (1) The Offeror shall provide the information required by the attachment entitled “Warranty Tracking Information” on each contract line item number, subline item number, or exhibit line item number for warranted items with its offer. Information required in the warranty attachment for each warranted item shall include such information as duration, fixed expiration, item type, starting event, usage, warranty administrator enterprise identifier, and warranty guarantor enterprise identifier.

(2) The successful offeror will be required to provide the following information no later than when the warranted items are presented for receipt and/or acceptance, in accordance with the clause at 252.246-7006—

(i) The unique item identifier for each warranted item required by the attachment entitled “Warranty Tracking Information;” and

(ii) All information required by the attachment entitled “Source of Repair Instructions” for each warranted item.

(3) For additional information on warranty attachments, see the “Warranty and Source of Repair” training and “Warranty and Source of Repair Tracking User Guide” accessible on the Product Data Reporting and Evaluation Program (PDREP) Web site at *https://www.pdrep.csd.disa.mil/pdrep_files/other/wsr.htm.*

(End of provision)

[76 FR 33170, June 8, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 17450, Mar. 28, 2014; 81 FR 17043, Mar. 25, 2016]
#### 1443.205 Contract clauses.

BPCs may establish procedures, when appropriate, for authorizing the CO to vary the 30-day period for submission of requests for adjustment prescribed by FAR 43.205.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7574

BRIAN SANDERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN CARMICHAEL, Warden; CHARLES MOLONY

CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-3898-4-21BE)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Sanders v. Carmichael, No. CA-95-3898-4-21BE (D.S.C. Sept.

27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Mr. John S. Duncan

Director Flight Standards Service Federal Aviation Administration February 30 2016 Dear Mr. Duncan, I am requesting an amendment to my Section 333 Exemption # 13878, Docket # FAA - 2015 - 4179. I recently purchased a DJI Phantom 3 Professional, serial# P76DCK12A20221, and I would like to add this sUAS to my Exemption. My FAA Certificate of Registration is FA334HE9ML Thank You, Paul Sw eigert 6205 Providence Dr Carpentersville, IL 60110 paulsw eigert@comcast.net